Annual Statements Open main menu

BERKLEY W R CORP - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)

e10vq
 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark one)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2010
or
     
o   Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the Transition Period from               to              .
Commission File Number 1-15202
W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware   22-1867895
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
475 Steamboat Road, Greenwich, Connecticut   06830
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
(203) 629-3000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
None
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)   Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of common stock, $.20 par value, outstanding as of July 30, 2010: 148,431,958
 
 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 6. Exhibits
SIGNATURES
EX-10.1
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)
                 
    June 30, 2010     December 31,  
    (Unaudited)     2009  
 
Assets
               
Investments:
               
Fixed maturity securities
  $ 11,147,752     $ 11,299,197  
Equity securities available for sale
    357,229       401,367  
Arbitrage trading account
    498,368       465,783  
Investment in arbitrage funds
    58,564       83,420  
Investment funds
    421,394       418,880  
Loans receivable
    373,605       381,591  
 
Total investments
    12,856,912       13,050,238  
 
Cash and cash equivalents
    781,463       515,430  
Premiums and fees receivable
    1,112,760       1,047,976  
Due from reinsurers
    1,062,726       972,820  
Accrued investment income
    134,745       130,524  
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
    235,736       211,054  
Deferred policy acquisition costs
    409,837       391,360  
Real estate, furniture and equipment
    245,003       246,605  
Deferred federal and foreign income taxes
    117,228       190,450  
Goodwill
    107,132       107,131  
Trading account receivables from brokers and clearing organizations
    183,175       310,042  
Current federal and foreign income taxes
    6,068        
Other assets
    164,141       154,966  
 
Total assets
  $ 17,416,926     $ 17,328,596  
 
Liabilities and Equity
               
Liabilities:
               
Reserves for losses and loss expenses
  $ 9,109,638     $ 9,071,671  
Unearned premiums
    2,009,298       1,928,428  
Due to reinsurers
    220,086       208,045  
Trading account securities sold but not yet purchased
    48,836       143,885  
Other liabilities
    754,975       779,347  
Junior subordinated debentures
    242,682       249,793  
Senior notes and other debt
    1,342,601       1,345,481  
 
Total liabilities
    13,728,116       13,726,650  
 
Equity:
               
Preferred stock, par value $.10 per share:
               
Authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding — none
           
Common stock, par value $.20 per share:
               
Authorized 500,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding, net of treasury shares, 148,421,425 and 156,552,355 shares
    47,024       47,024  
Additional paid-in capital
    926,406       926,359  
Retained earnings
    3,994,366       3,785,187  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    256,386       163,207  
Treasury stock, at cost, 86,696,493 and 78,565,563 shares
    (1,541,820 )     (1,325,710 )
 
Total stockholders’ equity
    3,682,362       3,596,067  
Noncontrolling interests
    6,448       5,879  
 
Total equity
    3,688,810       3,601,946  
 
Total liabilities and equity
  $ 17,416,926     $ 17,328,596  
 
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

1


 

W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
REVENUES:
                               
Net premiums written
  $ 961,354     $ 908,912     $ 1,945,304     $ 1,932,384  
Change in net unearned premiums
    (13,226 )     42,260       (66,615 )     (2,004 )
 
Net premiums earned
    948,128       951,172       1,878,689       1,930,380  
Net investment income
    128,191       132,135       267,034       270,351  
Income (losses) from investment funds
    1,540       (37,821 )     6,258       (152,895 )
Insurance service fees
    20,390       25,257       41,875       51,840  
Net investment gains (losses):
                               
Net realized gains on investment sales
    11,534       49,224       20,028       62,616  
Other-than-temporary impairments
          (23,932 )     (2,582 )     (134,132 )
Less investment impairments recognized in other comprehensive income
          8,604             8,604  
 
Net investment gains (losses)
    11,534       33,896       17,446       (62,912 )
 
Revenues from wholly-owned investees
    52,929       49,942       104,505       80,845  
Other income
    356       517       808       1,110  
 
Total revenues
    1,163,068       1,155,098       2,316,615       2,118,719  
 
 
                               
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES:
                               
Losses and loss expenses
    570,475       597,267       1,120,448       1,207,712  
Other operating costs and expenses
    370,823       365,514       738,790       722,861  
Expenses from wholly-owned investees
    49,934       46,791       98,908       76,745  
Interest expense
    26,014       20,213       52,055       40,437  
 
Total operating costs and expenses
    1,017,246       1,029,785       2,010,201       2,047,755  
 
 
                               
Income before income taxes
    145,822       125,313       306,414       70,964  
Income tax (expense) benefit
    (35,598 )     (27,881 )     (77,409 )     6,184  
 
Net income before noncontrolling interests
    110,224       97,432       229,005       77,148  
Noncontrolling interests
    (17 )     (45 )     (188 )     (107 )
 
 
                               
Net income to common stockholders
  $ 110,207     $ 97,387     $ 228,817     $ 77,041  
 
NET INCOME PER SHARE:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.73     $ 0.61     $ 1.50     $ 0.48  
Diluted
  $ 0.70     $ 0.59     $ 1.44     $ 0.46  
 
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

2


 

W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands)
                 
    For the Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009  
 
COMMON STOCK:
               
 
Beginning and end of period
  $ 47,024     $ 47,024  
 
 
               
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL:
               
Beginning of period
  $ 926,359     $ 920,241  
Stock options exercised and restricted units issued including tax benefit
    (11,168 )     (1,692 )
Restricted stock units expensed
    11,017       12,038  
Stock options expensed
          6  
Stock issued to directors
    198       75  
 
End of period
  $ 926,406     $ 930,668  
 
 
               
RETAINED EARNINGS:
               
Beginning of period
  $ 3,785,187     $ 3,514,531  
Net income to common stockholders
    228,817       77,041  
Dividends
    (19,638 )     (19,200 )
 
End of period
  $ 3,994,366     $ 3,572,372  
 
 
               
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):
               
Unrealized investment gains (losses):
               
Beginning of period
  $ 219,394     $ (142,216 )
Unrealized gains on securities not other-than-temporarily impaired
    108,305       179,189  
Unrealized gains on other-than-temporarily impaired securities
    974       (5,593 )
 
End of period
    328,673       31,380  
 
Currency translation adjustments:
               
Beginning of period
    (40,371 )     (72,475 )
Net change in period
    (17,220 )     29,055  
 
End of period
    (57,591 )     (43,420 )
 
Net pension asset:
               
Beginning of period
    (15,816 )     (14,268 )
Net change in period
    1,120       983  
 
End of period
    (14,696 )     (13,285 )
 
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 256,386     $ (25,325 )
 
 
               
TREASURY STOCK:
               
Beginning of period
  $ (1,325,710 )   $ (1,206,518 )
Stock exercised/vested
    15,058       3,551  
Stock repurchased
    (231,704 )     (31,842 )
Stock issued to directors
    536       342  
 
End of period
  $ (1,541,820 )   $ (1,234,467 )
 
 
               
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS:
               
Beginning of period
  $ 5,879     $ 5,361  
Contribution/(distributions)
    373       (82 )
Net income
    188       107  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
    8       41  
 
End of period
  $ 6,448     $ 5,427  
 
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

3


 

W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands)
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Net income before noncontrolling interests
  $ 110,224     $ 97,432     $ 229,005     $ 77,148  
Other comprehensive income:
                               
Change in unrealized foreign exchange gains (losses)
    (4,941 )     36,927       (17,220 )     29,055  
Unrealized holding gains on investment securities arising during the period, net of taxes
    76,667       105,467       120,579       132,834  
Reclassification adjustment for net investment gains (losses) included in net income, net of taxes
    (7,449 )     (22,041 )     (11,292 )     40,803  
Change in unrecognized pension obligation, net of taxes
    561       492       1,120       983  
 
Other comprehensive income
    64,838       120,845       93,187       203,675  
 
Comprehensive income
    175,062       218,277       322,192       280,823  
 
                               
Comprehensive income to the noncontrolling interests
    (19 )     (67 )     (196 )     (148 )
 
Comprehensive income to common stockholders
  $ 175,043     $ 218,210     $ 321,996     $ 280,675  
 
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

4


 

W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands)
                 
    For the Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009  
 
CASH FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
               
Net income to common stockholders
  $ 228,817     $ 77,041  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from (used in) operating activities:
               
Net investment (gains) losses
    (17,446 )     62,912  
Depreciation and amortization
    42,468       47,827  
Noncontrolling interests
    188       107  
Undistributed income and losses from investment funds
    22,197       153,506  
Stock incentive plans
    12,367       12,664  
Change in:
               
Securities trading account
    (32,585 )     (425,327 )
Investment in arbitrage funds
    24,856       (8,576 )
Trading account receivables from brokers and clearing organizations
    126,867       (3,094 )
Trading account securities sold but not yet purchased
    (95,049 )     133,450  
Premiums and fees receivable
    (69,028 )     (53,417 )
Due from reinsurers
    (41,365 )     (9,104 )
Accrued investment income
    (4,531 )     (1,797 )
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
    10,697       (39,186 )
Deferred policy acquisition costs
    (19,793 )     (4,717 )
Deferred income taxes
    14,195       (25,901 )
Other assets
    (12,191 )     1,096  
Reserves for losses and loss expenses
    5,748       53,958  
Unearned premiums
    53,049       37,547  
Due to reinsurers
    13,845       38,571  
Other liabilities
    (76,636 )     (56,792 )
 
Net cash from (used in) operating activities
    186,670       (9,232 )
 
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
Proceeds from sales, excluding trading account:
               
Fixed maturity securities
    1,016,514       1,230,406  
Equity securities
    64,962       119,589  
Distributions from investment funds
    37,235       2,876  
Proceeds from maturities and prepayments of fixed maturity securities
    628,898       640,685  
Cost of purchases, excluding trading account:
               
Fixed maturity securities
    (1,341,503 )     (2,389,311 )
Equity securities
    (31,262 )     (17,506 )
Contributions to investment funds
    (60,675 )     (38,355 )
Change in loans receivable
    6,161       (6,589 )
Net additions to real estate, furniture and equipment
    (20,307 )     (11,857 )
Change in balances due to security brokers
    55,446       145,065  
Payment for business purchased, net of cash acquired
          (33,162 )
 
Net cash from (used in) investing activities
    355,469       (358,159 )
 
CASH FLOWS USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
Purchase of common treasury shares
    (231,704 )     (31,842 )
Cash dividends to common stockholders
    (29,196 )     (19,200 )
Bank deposits received
    9,715       15,352  
Repayments to federal home loan bank
    (7,500 )     (3,035 )
Net proceeds from stock options exercised
    3,821       1,446  
Repayment of debt
    (10,775 )     (340 )
Other, net
    (232 )     (90 )
 
Net cash used in financing activities
    (265,871 )     (37,709 )
 
Net impact on cash due to change in foreign exchange rates
    (10,235 )     41,776  
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    266,033       (363,324 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    515,430       1,134,835  
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 781,463     $ 771,511  
 
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

5


 

W. R. Berkley Corporation and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(1) General
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of W. R. Berkley Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, which are necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position and results of operations on a basis consistent with the prior audited consolidated financial statements. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements requires the use of management estimates. For further information related to a description of areas of judgment and estimates and other information necessary to understand the Company’s financial position and results of operations, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Reclassifications have been made in the 2009 financial statements as originally reported to conform to the presentation of the 2010 financial statements.
The income tax provision has been computed based on the Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for the quarter differs from the federal income tax rate of 35% principally because of tax-exempt investment income.
(2) Per share data
The Company presents both basic and diluted net income per share (“EPS”) amounts. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is based upon the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period and is calculated using the treasury stock method for stock incentive plans. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation in periods in which they have an anti-dilutive effect. Stock options for which the exercise price exceeds the average market price over the period have an anti-dilutive effect on EPS and, accordingly, are excluded from the calculation.
The weighted average number of common shares used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share was as follows (amounts in thousands):
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Basic
    151,215       160,008       152,324       160,546  
Diluted
    157,461       166,226       158,539       166,716  
(3) Statements of Cash Flow
Interest payments were $51,347,000 and $39,778,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Income taxes paid were $94,389,000 and $26,747,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(4) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance that: (i) eliminates the concept of qualifying “special-purpose entity” (“SPE”); (ii) alters the requirement for transferring assets off of the reporting company’s balance sheet; (iii) requires additional disclosure about a transferor’s involvement in transferred assets; and (iv) eliminates special treatment of guaranteed mortgage securitizations. This guidance was effective as of January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not impact our financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2009, the FASB issued guidance requiring the reporting entity to perform a qualitative analysis that results in a variable interest entity (“VIE”) being consolidated if the reporting entity: (i) has the power to direct activities of the VIE that significantly impact the VIE’s financial performance; and (ii) has an obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that may be significant to the VIE. This guidance further requires enhanced disclosures, including disclosure of significant judgments and assumptions as to whether a VIE must be consolidated, and how involvement with a VIE affects the company’s financial

6


 

statements. This guidance was effective January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued guidance that requires additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. The guidance requires entities to disclose the amounts and reasons for significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, reasons for any transfers in or out of Level 3 and separate information in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. Portions of the guidance are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, which we adopted January 1, 2010, and the remaining guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance will expand the disclosures related to fair value measurements in the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
(5) Investments in Fixed Maturity Securities
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, investments in fixed maturity securities were as follows:
                                         
    Amortized     Gross Unrealized     Fair     Carrying  
(Dollars in thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Value     Value  
 
June 30, 2010
                                       
Held to maturity:
                                       
State and municipal
  $ 72,131     $ 6,008     $ (11 )   $ 78,128     $ 72,131  
Residential mortgage-backed
    41,114       3,715             44,829       41,114  
Corporate
    4,995       192             5,187       4,995  
 
Total held to maturity
    118,240       9,915       (11 )     128,144       118,240  
 
Available for sale:
                                       
U.S. government and government agency
    1,519,879       67,022       (675 )     1,586,226       1,586,226  
State and municipal (1)
    5,379,187       267,629       (24,262 )     5,622,554       5,622,554  
Mortgage-backed securities:
                                       
Residential (2)
    1,337,909       57,729       (15,255 )     1,380,383       1,380,383  
Commercial
    44,876             (7,549 )     37,327       37,327  
Corporate
    1,894,541       102,511       (30,930 )     1,966,122       1,966,122  
Foreign
    423,381       15,233       (1,714 )     436,900       436,900  
 
Total available for sale
    10,599,773       510,124       (80,385 )     11,029,512       11,029,512  
 
Total investment in fixed maturity securities
  $ 10,718,013     $ 520,039     $ (80,396 )   $ 11,157,656     $ 11,147,752  
 
 
                                       
December 31, 2009
                                       
Held to maturity:
                                       
State and municipal
  $ 70,847     $ 6,778     $ (739 )   $ 76,886     $ 70,847  
Residential mortgage-backed
    44,318       2,984             47,302       44,318  
Corporate
    4,994             (13 )     4,981       4,994  
 
Total held to maturity
    120,159       9,762       (752 )     129,169       120,159  
 
Available for sale:
                                       
U.S. government and government agency
    1,677,579       40,358       (3,784 )     1,714,153       1,714,153  
State and municipal (1)
    5,551,632       238,271       (41,048 )     5,748,855       5,748,855  
Mortgage-backed securities:
                                       
Residential (2)
    1,537,331       38,229       (44,343 )     1,531,217       1,531,217  
Commercial
    47,292             (12,069 )     35,223       35,223  
Corporate
    1,719,874       59,082       (35,574 )     1,743,382       1,743,382  
Foreign
    394,711       12,323       (826 )     406,208       406,208  
 
Total available for sale
    10,928,419       388,263       (137,644 )     11,179,038       11,179,038  
 
Total investment in fixed maturity securities
  $ 11,048,578     $ 398,025     $ (138,396 )   $ 11,308,207     $ 11,299,197  
 
 
(1)   Gross unrealized losses for state and municipal securities include $659,000 and $340,000 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, related to the non-credit portion of other than temporary impairments (“OTTI”) recognized in other comprehensive income.
 
(2)   Gross unrealized losses for residential mortgage-backed securities include $3,268,000 and $5,085,000 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, related to the non-credit portion of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive income.

7


 

The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities at June 30, 2010, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations:
                 
    Amortized        
(Dollars in thousands)   Cost     Fair Value  
 
Due in one year or less
  $ 598,992     $ 604,725  
Due after one year through five years
    2,845,018       2,980,626  
Due after five years through ten years
    2,839,195       3,016,292  
Due after ten years
    3,010,909       3,093,474  
Mortgage-backed securities
    1,423,899       1,462,539  
 
Total
  $ 10,718,013     $ 11,157,656  
 
At June 30, 2010, there were no investments, other than investments in United States government and government agency securities, which exceeded 10% of common stockholders’ equity.
(6) Investments in Equity Securities Available for Sale
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, investments in equity securities available for sale were as follows:
                                         
    Amortized     Gross Unrealized     Fair     Carrying  
(Dollars in thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Value     Value  
 
June 30, 2010
                                       
Common stocks
  $ 48,120     $ 97,096     $ (3,739 )   $ 141,477     $ 141,477  
Preferred stocks
    232,739       4,841       (21,828 )     215,752       215,752  
 
Total
  $ 280,859     $ 101,937     $ (25,567 )   $ 357,229     $ 357,229  
 
 
                                       
December 31, 2009
                                       
Common stocks
  $ 27,237     $ 97,554     $ (5,731 )   $ 119,060     $ 119,060  
Preferred stocks
    285,490       9,745       (12,928 )     282,307       282,307  
 
Total
  $ 312,727     $ 107,299     $ (18,659 )   $ 401,367     $ 401,367  
 
(7) Arbitrage Trading Account and Arbitrage Funds
The fair value and carrying value of the arbitrage trading account and arbitrage funds and related assets and liabilities were as follows:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009  
 
Arbitrage trading account
  $ 498,368     $ 465,783  
Investment in arbitrage funds
    58,564       83,420  
 
               
Related assets and liabilities:
               
Receivables from brokers
    183,175       310,042  
Securities sold but not yet purchased
    (48,836 )     (143,885 )
 

8


 

(8) Net Investment Income
Net investment income consists of the following:
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Investment income earned on:
                               
Fixed maturity securities, including cash
  $ 125,649     $ 120,211     $ 250,758     $ 242,598  
Equity securities available for sale
    2,628       6,010       5,993       12,074  
Arbritage trading account (1)
    1,131       6,938       12,354       17,599  
 
Gross investment income
    129,408       133,159       269,105       272,271  
Investment expense
    (1,217 )     (1,024 )     (2,071 )     (1,920 )
 
Net investment income
  $ 128,191     $ 132,135     $ 267,034     $ 270,351  
 
 
(1)   Investment income earned from trading account activity includes net unrealized trading losses of $1,909,000 and $174,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and net unrealized trading gains of $298,000 and $1,498,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(9) Investment Funds
Investment funds include the following:
                                 
    Carrying Value     Income (Losses)  
    as of     from Investment Funds  
    June 30,     December 31,     For the Six Months Ended June 30,  
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Real estate
  $ 198,791     $ 193,178     $ (3,906 )   $ (132,828 )
Energy
    97,459       106,213       13,949       (18,417 )
Other
    125,144       119,489       (3,785 )     (1,650 )
 
Total
  $ 421,394     $ 418,880     $ 6,258     $ (152,895 )
 
(10) Loans Receivable
The amortized cost of loans receivable was $374 million and $382 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Amortized cost is net of a valuation allowance of $16.4 million and $13.8 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company increased its valuation allowance by $2.6 million. The ten largest loans have an aggregate amortized cost of $296 million and an aggregate fair value of $230 million and are secured by commercial real estate. These loans earn interest at floating LIBOR-based interest rates and have maturities (inclusive of extension options) between August 2011 and January 2013. The loans are secured by office buildings (60%), hotels (27%) and senior living facilities (13%), with properties located primarily in New York City, California, Hawaii, Boston and Philadelphia.

9


 

(11) Realized and Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses)
Realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) are as follows:
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Realized investment gains (losses):
                               
Fixed maturity securities:
                               
Gains
  $ 12,342     $ 11,920     $ 21,850     $ 26,621  
Losses
    (2,165 )     (527 )     (3,258 )     (1,578 )
Equity securities available for sale
    637       37,143       791       36,024  
Other
    224             224        
Sales of investment funds
    496       688       421       1,549  
Provision for OTTI (1)
          (23,932 )     (2,582 )     (134,132 )
Less investment impairments recognized in other comprehensive income
          8,604             8,604  
 
Total net investment gains (losses) before income taxes
    11,534       33,896       17,446       (62,912 )
Income taxes
    (4,085 )     (11,855 )     (6,154 )     22,109  
 
Total net investment gains (losses)
  $ 7,449     $ 22,041     $ 11,292     $ (40,803 )
 
 
                               
Change in unrealized gains (losses) of available for sales securities:
                               
Fixed maturity securities
  $ 124,287     $ 82,311     $ 178,323     $ 238,552  
Less non-credit portion of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive income
    789       (8,604 )     1,499       (8,604 )
Equity securities available for sale
    (15,538 )     51,806       (12,270 )     37,412  
Investment funds
    (3,358 )     6,403       299       4,232  
Cash and cash equivalents
          (42 )     (1 )     (76 )
 
Total change in unrealized gains before income taxes and noncontrolling interests
    106,180       131,874       167,850       271,516  
Income taxes
    (36,962 )     (48,449 )     (58,563 )     (97,879 )
Noncontrolling interests
    (2 )     (21 )     (8 )     (41 )
 
Total change in unrealized gains
  $ 69,216     $ 83,404     $ 109,279     $ 173,596  
 
 
(1)   Includes change in valuation allowance for loans receivable of $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

10


 

(12) Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position
The following table summarizes all securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 by the length of time those securities have been continuously in an unrealized loss position.
                                                 
    Less Than 12 Months     12 Months or Greater     Total  
            Gross             Gross             Gross  
            Unrealized             Unrealized             Unrealized  
(Dollars in thousands)   Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses  
 
June 30, 2010
                                               
U.S. government and agency
  $ 33,300     $ 597     $ 7,120     $ 78     $ 40,420     $ 675  
State and municipal
    197,771       1,805       198,434       22,468       396,205       24,273  
Mortgage-backed securities
    61,371       2,251       208,860       20,553       270,231       22,804  
Corporate
    202,260       12,818       117,973       18,112       320,233       30,930  
Foreign
    69,402       1,714                   69,402       1,714  
 
Fixed maturity securities
    564,104       19,185       532,387       61,211       1,096,491       80,396  
Common stocks
    23,253       1,854       8,153       1,885       31,406       3,739  
Preferred stocks
    66,002       3,739       94,159       18,089       160,161       21,828  
 
Equity securities
    89,255       5,593       102,312       19,974       191,567       25,567  
 
Total
  $ 653,359     $ 24,778     $ 634,699     $ 81,185     $ 1,288,058     $ 105,963  
 
 
                                               
December 31, 2009
                                               
U.S. government and agency
  $ 389,745     $ 3,653     $ 7,361     $ 131     $ 397,106     $ 3,784  
State and municipal
    376,914       12,971       443,666       28,816       820,580       41,787  
Mortgage-backed securities
    306,840       12,719       260,519       43,693       567,359       56,412  
Corporate
    194,690       13,958       172,656       21,629       367,346       35,587  
Foreign
    81,368       826                   81,368       826  
 
Fixed maturity securities
    1,349,557       44,127       884,202       94,269       2,233,759       138,396  
Common stocks
    19,948       5,731                   19,948       5,731  
Preferred stocks
    9,951       76       163,985       12,852       173,936       12,928  
 
Equity securities
    29,899       5,807       163,985       12,852       193,884       18,659  
 
Total
  $ 1,379,456     $ 49,934     $ 1,048,187     $ 107,121     $ 2,427,643     $ 157,055  
 
     Fixed Maturity Securities — A summary of the Company’s non-investment grade fixed maturity securities that were in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2010 is presented in the table below:
                         
                    Gross  
    Number of     Aggregate     Unrealized  
(Dollars in thousands)   Securities     Fair Value     Loss  
 
Unrealized loss less than $5 million:
                       
Mortgage-backed securities
    8     $ 76,949     $ 7,687  
Corporate
    8       34,286       5,321  
State and municipal
    5       38,823       5,244  
Foreign
    10       19,833       975  
Unrealized loss $5 million or more
                       
Mortgage-backed security (1)
    1       29,970       7,030  
 
Total
    32     $ 199,861     $ 26,257  
 
 
(1)   This investment is secured by 99 properties comprising approximately 30 million square feet of office space located primarily in Boston, Northern California and Los Angeles. The current debt maturity of February 2011 can be extended at the borrower’s option through February 2012 provided that there is no continuing default. The Company believes the amount of outstanding debt for the Company’s debt layer and all debt layers senior to the Company’s debt layer to be below the current fair values for the underlying properties. Based on the portfolio’s stable performance (e.g., occupancy rates, lease terms and debt service coverage) and on there being substantial subordinate capital, the Company does not consider the investment to be OTTI.

11


 

     For OTTI of fixed maturity securities that management does not intend to sell or, more likely than not, would not be required to sell, the portion of the decline in value considered to be due to credit factors is recognized in earnings and the portion of the decline in value considered to be due to non-credit factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. The table below provides a roll-forward of the portion of impairments recognized in earnings for those securities that have been impaired due to both credit factors and non-credit factors.
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Beginning balance of amounts related to credit losses
  $ 5,661     $     $ 5,661     $  
Additions for amounts related to credit losses
          2,610             2,610  
 
Ending balance of amounts related to credit losses
  $ 5,661     $ 2,610     $ 5,661     $ 2,610  
 
The Company has evaluated its fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position and believes the unrealized losses are due primarily to temporary market and sector-related factors rather than to issuer-specific factors. None of these securities are delinquent or in default on financial covenants. Based on its assessment of these issuers, the Company expects them to continue to meet their contractual payment obligations as they become due and does not consider any of these securities to be OTTI.
Preferred Stocks — At June 30, 2010, there were ten preferred stocks in an unrealized loss position, with an aggregate fair value of $160 million and a gross unrealized loss of $22 million. Four of these securities, with an aggregate fair value of $27 million and a gross unrealized loss of $12 million had an unrealized loss of greater than 20%. Two of these securities (with an aggregate fair value of $3 million and an aggregate unrealized loss of $3 million) are rated non-investment grade. The Company does not consider any of these securities to be OTTI.
Common Stocks - At June 30, 2010, the Company owned four common stocks in an unrealized loss position with an aggregate fair value of $31 million and an aggregate unrealized loss of $4 million. The Company does not consider these securities to be OTTI.
Loans Receivable - The Company monitors the performance of its loans receivable, including current market conditions for each loan and the ability to collect principal and interest. For loans where the Company determines it is probable that the contractual terms will not be met, a valuation reserve is established with a charge to net investment losses. Loans receivable are reported net of a valuation reserve of $16.4 million and $13.8 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
(13) Fair Value Measurements
The Company’s fixed maturity and equity securities available for sale and its trading account securities are carried at fair value. Fair value is defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” The Company utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for similar assets in active markets. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs may only be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.
Because many fixed maturity securities do not trade on a daily basis, the Company utilizes pricing models and processes which may include benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing. Market inputs used to evaluate securities include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. Quoted prices are often unavailable for recently issued securities, securities that are infrequently traded or securities that are only traded in private transactions. For publicly traded securities for which quoted prices are unavailable, the Company determines fair value based on independent broker quotations and other observable market data. For securities traded only in private negotiations, the Company determines fair value based primarily on the cost of such securities, which is adjusted to reflect prices of recent placements of securities of the same issuer, financial projections, credit quality and business developments of the issuer and other relevant information.

12


 

The following tables present the assets and liabilities measured at fair value, on a recurring basis, as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 by level:
                                 
(Dollars in thousands)   Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
 
June 30, 2010
                               
Assets:
                               
Fixed maturity securities available for sale:
                               
U.S. government and agency
  $ 1,586,226     $     $ 1,586,226     $  
State and municipal
    5,622,554             5,622,554        
Mortgage-backed securities
    1,417,710             1,417,710        
Corporate
    1,966,122             1,887,600       78,522  
Foreign
    436,900             436,900        
 
Total fixed maturity securities available for sale
    11,029,512             10,950,990       78,522  
 
Equity securities available for sale:
                               
Common stocks
    141,477       35,461       104,457       1,559  
Preferred stocks
    215,752             152,320       63,432  
 
Total equity securities available for sale
    357,229       35,461       256,777       64,991  
 
Arbitrage trading account
    498,368       498,015             353  
 
Total
  $ 11,885,109     $ 533,476     $ 11,207,767     $ 143,866  
 
Liabilities:
                               
Securities sold but not yet purchased
  $ 48,836     $ 48,836     $     $  
 
 
                               
December 31, 2009
                               
Assets:
                               
Fixed maturity securities available for sale:
                               
U.S. government and agency
  $ 1,714,153     $     $ 1,714,153     $  
State and municipal
    5,748,855             5,748,855        
Mortgage-backed securities
    1,566,440             1,540,540       25,900  
Corporate
    1,743,382             1,653,222       90,160  
Foreign
    406,208             406,208        
 
Total fixed maturity securities available for sale
    11,179,038             11,062,978       116,060  
 
 
                               
Equity securities available for sale:
                               
Common stocks
    119,060       11,295       106,206       1,559  
Preferred stocks
    282,307             227,594       54,713  
 
Total equity securities available for sale
    401,367       11,295       333,800       56,272  
 
Arbitrage trading account
    465,783       465,430             353  
 
Total
  $ 12,046,188     $ 476,725     $ 11,396,778     $ 172,685  
 
 
                               
Liabilities:
                               
Securities sold but not yet purchased
  $ 143,885     $ 143,885     $     $  
 
There were no transfers between Levels 1 or 2 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.

13


 

The following tables summarize changes in Level 3 assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010:
                                                 
            Gains (Losses) Included in:                    
                    Other     Purchases              
    Beginning             Comprehensive     (Sales)     Transfers     Ending  
(Dollars in thousands)   Balance     Earnings     Income     (Maturities)     In/(Out)     Balance  
 
For the three months ended June 30, 2010
                                               
Fixed maturity securities available for sale:
                                               
Corporate
  $ 85,438     $ 49     $ (119 )   $ (6,846 )   $     $ 78,522  
 
Total
    85,438       49       (119 )     (6,846 )           78,522  
 
Equity securities available for sale:
                                               
Common stocks
    1,559                               1,559  
Preferred stocks
    63,110             322                   63,432  
 
Total
    64,669             322                   64,991  
 
Arbitrage trading account
    353                               353  
 
Total
  $ 150,460     $ 49     $ 203     $ (6,846 )   $     $ 143,866  
 
 
                                               
For the six months ended June 30, 2010
                                               
Fixed maturity securities available for sale:
                                               
Mortgage-backed securities
  $ 25,900     $     $     $     $ (25,900 )   $  
Corporate
    90,160       223       (240 )     (11,621 )           78,522  
 
Total
    116,060       223       (240 )     (11,621 )     (25,900 )     78,522  
 
Equity securities available for sale:
                                               
Common stocks
    1,559                               1,559  
Preferred stocks
    54,713             (1,659 )     10,378             63,432  
 
Total
    56,272             (1,659 )     10,378             64,991  
 
Arbitrage trading account
    353                               353  
 
Total
  $ 172,685     $ 223     $ (1,899 )   $ (1,243 )   $ (25,900 )   $ 143,866  
 
The transfer of a mortgage-backed security from Level 3 in the six months ended June 30, 2010 was based upon the availability of broker dealer quotations, as the Company was able to obtain quotations from third party broker dealers as of June 30, 2010.

14


 

(14) Reinsurance
     The following is a summary of reinsurance financial information:
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Written premiums:
                               
Direct
  $ 953,755     $ 905,177     $ 1,892,079     $ 1,846,903  
Assumed
    159,714       149,400       347,510       355,916  
Ceded
    (152,115 )     (145,665 )     (294,285 )     (270,435 )
 
Total net written premiums
  $ 961,354     $ 908,912     $ 1,945,304     $ 1,932,384  
 
 
                               
Earned premiums:
                               
Direct
  $ 926,387     $ 920,784     $ 1,831,730     $ 1,852,984  
Assumed
    160,459       149,129       319,845       311,443  
Ceded
    (138,718 )     (118,741 )     (272,886 )     (234,047 )
 
Total net earned premiums
  $ 948,128     $ 951,172     $ 1,878,689     $ 1,930,380  
 
 
                               
 
Ceded losses incurred
  $ 135,245     $ 43,320     $ 226,652     $ 120,603  
 
The Company reinsures a portion of its exposures principally to reduce its net liability on individual risks and to protect against catastrophic losses. Estimated amounts due from reinsurers are reported net of reserves for uncollectible reinsurance of $4 million as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
(15) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments:
                                 
    June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
(Dollars in thousands)   Carrying Value     Fair Value     Carrying Value     Fair Value  
 
Assets:
                               
Fixed maturity securities
  $ 11,147,752     $ 11,157,656     $ 11,299,197     $ 11,308,207  
Equity securities available for sale
    357,229       357,229       401,367       401,367  
Arbitrage trading account
    498,368       498,368       465,783       465,783  
Investment in arbitrage funds
    58,564       58,564       83,420       83,420  
Loans receivable
    373,605       312,804       381,591       285,122  
Cash and cash equivalents
    781,463       781,463       515,430       515,430  
Trading account receivables from brokers and clearing organizations
    183,175       183,175       310,042       310,042  
Liabilities:
                               
Trading account securities sold but not yet purchased
    48,836       48,836       143,885       143,885  
Due to broker
    61,058       61,058       5,612       5,612  
Junior subordinated debentures
    242,682       242,200       249,793       242,217  
Senior notes and other debt
    1,342,601       1,413,572       1,345,481       1,386,802  
The estimated fair values of the Company’s fixed maturity securities, equity securities available for sale and arbitrage trading account securities are based on various valuation techniques, as described in note 13 above. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for similar assets in active markets. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs may only be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available. The fair value of loans receivable are

15


 

estimated by using current institutional purchaser yield requirements for loans with similar credit characteristics. The fair value of the senior notes and other debt and the junior subordinated debentures is based on spreads for similar securities.
(16) Restricted Stock Units
Pursuant to its stock incentive plan, the Company may issue restricted stock units (RSUs) to officers of the Company and its subsidiaries. The RSUs generally vest five years from the award date and are subject to other vesting and forfeiture provisions contained in the award agreement. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 754,500 RSUs at a fair value of $20 million as compared to 55,000 RSUs at a fair value of $1 million, during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
(17) Industry Segments
The Company’s operations are presently conducted in five segments of the insurance business: specialty, regional, alternative markets, reinsurance and international.
Our specialty segment underwrites complex and sophisticated third-party liability risks, principally within the excess and surplus lines. The primary lines of business are premises operations, professional liability, commercial automobile, products liability and property lines. The companies within the segment are divided along the different customer bases and product lines that they serve. The specialty units deliver their products through a variety of distribution channels depending on the customer base and particular risks insured. The customers in this segment are highly diverse.
Our regional segment provides commercial insurance products to customers primarily in 45 states. Key clients of this segment are small-to-mid-sized businesses and state and local governmental entities. The regional subsidiaries are organized geographically, which provides them with the flexibility to adapt to local market conditions, while enjoying the superior administrative capabilities and financial strength of the Company. The regional operations are organized geographically based on markets served.
Our alternative markets operations specialize in developing, insuring, reinsuring and administering self-insurance programs and other alternative risk transfer mechanisms. Our clients include employers, employer groups, insurers, and alternative market funds seeking less costly, more efficient ways to manage exposure to risks. In addition to providing insurance, the alternative markets segment also provides a wide variety of fee-based services, including consulting and administrative services.
Our reinsurance operations specialize in underwriting property casualty reinsurance on both a treaty and a facultative basis. The principal reinsurance units are facultative reinsurance, which writes individual certificates and program facultative business, treaty reinsurance, which functions as a traditional reinsurer in specialty and standard reinsurance lines, and Lloyd’s reinsurance, which writes property and casualty reinsurance through Lloyd’s.
Our international segment offers personal and commercial property casualty insurance in South America, commercial insurance in the United Kingdom, Continental Europe and Canada and reinsurance in Australia and Southeast Asia.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Income tax expense and benefits are calculated based upon the Company’s overall effective tax rate.
Summary financial information about the Company’s operating segments is presented in the following table. Income (loss) before income taxes by segment consists of revenues less expenses related to the respective segment’s operations, including allocated investment income. Identifiable assets by segment are those assets used in or allocated to the operation of each segment.

16


 

                                                 
    Revenues              
            Investment                     Pre-Tax     Net  
    Earned     Income and                     Income     Income  
(Dollars in thousands)   Premiums     Funds     Other     Total     (Loss)     (Loss)  
 
For the three months ended June 30, 2010:
                                               
Specialty
  $ 316,513     $ 42,979     $ 820     $ 360,312     $ 75,177     $ 54,138  
Regional
    266,629       19,641       739       287,009       25,505       18,989  
Alternative markets
    155,227       29,675       18,834       203,736       45,571       33,262  
Reinsurance
    105,632       26,838             132,470       30,157       22,894  
International
    104,127       9,286             113,413       6,586       1,761  
Corporate, other and eliminations (1)
          1,312       53,282       54,594       (48,708 )     (28,286 )
Net investment gains
                11,534       11,534       11,534       7,449  
 
Consolidated
  $ 948,128     $ 129,731     $ 85,209     $ 1,163,068     $ 145,822     $ 110,207  
 
For the three months ended June 30, 2009:
                                               
Specialty
  $ 346,052     $ 30,691     $ 879     $ 377,622     $ 65,920     $ 50,475  
Regional
    281,903       14,113       172       296,188       11,677       11,163  
Alternative markets
    151,309       20,305       24,209       195,823       36,961       27,315  
Reinsurance
    94,257       20,573             114,830       21,228       19,134  
International
    77,651       6,736             84,387       720       2,324  
Corporate, other and eliminations (1)
          1,896       50,456       52,352       (45,089 )     (35,065 )
Net investment gains
                33,896       33,896       33,896       22,041  
 
Consolidated
  $ 951,172     $ 94,314     $ 109,612     $ 1,155,098     $ 125,313     $ 97,387  
 
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2010:
                                               
Specialty
  $ 629,466     $ 92,213     $ 1,618     $ 723,297     $ 150,847     $ 109,291  
Regional
    530,298       42,582       1,666       574,546       67,469       49,046  
Alternative markets
    310,012       62,522       38,597       411,131       96,556       70,383  
Reinsurance
    205,190       55,431             260,621       64,577       48,732  
International
    203,723       16,383             220,106       6,959       5,414  
Corporate, other and eliminations (1)
          4,161       105,307       109,468       (97,440 )     (65,341 )
Net investment gains
                17,446       17,446       17,446       11,292  
 
Consolidated
  $ 1,878,689     $ 273,292     $ 164,634     $ 2,316,615     $ 306,414     $ 228,817  
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2009
                                               
Specialty
  $ 703,980     $ 34,676     $ 1,773     $ 740,429     $ 93,664     $ 72,606  
Regional
    567,519       15,850       1,253       584,622       30,042       24,886  
Alternative markets
    303,302       25,485       48,820       377,607       67,395       52,423  
Reinsurance
    199,880       22,919             222,799       24,227       23,496  
International
    155,699       14,737             170,436       6,888       5,903  
Corporate, other and eliminations (1)
          3,789       81,949       85,738       (88,340 )     (61,470 )
Net investment losses
                (62,912 )     (62,912 )     (62,912 )     (40,803 )
 
Consolidated
  $ 1,930,380     $ 117,456     $ 70,883     $ 2,118,719     $ 70,964     $ 77,041  
 
Identifiable assets by segment are as follows:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009  
  | |
Specialty
  $ 5,852,289     $ 5,589,666  
Regional
    2,725,909       2,741,269  
Alternative markets
    3,777,956       3,643,214  
Reinsurance
    2,974,253       3,142,017  
International
    1,200,661       1,118,994  
Corporate, other and eliminations (1)
    885,858       1,093,436  
 
Consolidated
  $ 17,416,926     $ 17,328,596  
 
 
(1)   Corporate, other and eliminations represent corporate revenues and expenses, net investment gains and losses and other items that are not allocated to business segments.

17


 

Net premiums earned by major line of business are as follows:
                                 
    For the Three Month     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Specialty
                               
Premises operations
  $ 99,819     $ 114,649     $ 187,759     $ 239,749  
Property
    49,143       52,481       99,922       100,763  
Professional liability
    48,442       42,011       95,037       82,437  
Products liability
    24,449       34,683       63,236       73,764  
Commercial automobile
    32,647       49,031       68,628       103,423  
Other
    62,013       53,197       114,884       103,844  
 
Total specialty
    316,513       346,052       629,466       703,980  
 
Regional
                               
Commercial multiple peril
    97,043       101,704       193,113       206,880  
Commercial automobile
    75,672       79,971       151,637       163,307  
Workers’ compensation
    53,707       60,865       106,678       118,811  
Other
    40,207       39,363       78,870       78,521  
 
Total regional
    266,629       281,903       530,298       567,519  
 
Alternative Markets
                               
Primary workers’ compensation
    65,054       61,725       127,972       122,061  
Excess workers’ compensation
    57,723       63,766       116,051       130,214  
Other
    32,450       25,818       65,989       51,027  
 
Total alternative markets
    155,227       151,309       310,012       303,302  
 
Reinsurance
                               
Casualty
    76,222       77,207       148,145       168,369  
Property
    29,410       17,050       57,045       31,511  
 
Total reinsurance
    105,632       94,257       205,190       199,880  
 
International
    104,127       77,651       203,723       155,699  
 
Total
  $ 948,128     $ 951,172     $ 1,878,689     $ 1,930,380  
 
(18) Commitments, Litigation and Contingent Liabilities
The Company’s subsidiaries are subject to disputes, including litigation and arbitration, arising in the ordinary course of their insurance and reinsurance businesses. The Company’s estimates of the costs of settling such matters are reflected in its aggregate reserves for losses and loss expenses, and the Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of such matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. However, adverse outcomes are possible and could negatively impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

18


 

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT
     This is a “Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This document may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as ‘believes,” “expects,” “potential,” “continued,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “predicts,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” or the negative version of those words or other comparable words. Any forward-looking statements contained herein, including statements related to our outlook for the industry and for our performance for the year 2010 and beyond, are based upon the Company’s historical performance and on current plans, estimates and expectations. The inclusion of this forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the future plans, estimates or expectations contemplated by us will be achieved. They are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to: the cyclical nature of the property casualty industry; the long-tail and potentially volatile nature of the insurance and reinsurance business; product demand and pricing; claims development and the process of estimating reserves; investment risks, including those of our portfolio of fixed maturity securities and investments in equity securities, including investments in financial institutions, municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities, loans receivable, investment funds, merger arbitrage and private equity investments; the impact of significant competition; the impact of the economic downturn, and any legislative, regulatory, accounting or other initiatives taken in response to it, on our results and financial condition; the uncertain nature of damage theories and loss amounts; natural and man-made catastrophic losses, including as a result of terrorist activities; the success of our new ventures or acquisitions and the availability of other opportunities; the availability of reinsurance; our retention under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007; the ability of our reinsurers to pay reinsurance recoverables owed to us; foreign currency and political risks relating to our international operations; other legislative and regulatory developments, including those related to business practices in the insurance industry; changes in the ratings assigned to us or our insurance company subsidiaries by rating agencies; the availability of dividends from our insurance company subsidiaries; our ability to attract and retain qualified employees; and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These risks and uncertainties could cause our actual results for the year 2010 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement we make. Any projections of growth in our net premiums written and management fees would not necessarily result in commensurate levels of underwriting and operating profits. Our future financial performance is dependent upon factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our other SEC filings. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made.

19


 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
          W. R. Berkley Corporation is an insurance holding company that is among the largest commercial lines writers in the United States and operates in five business segments: specialty, regional, alternative markets, reinsurance and international. The Company’s primary sources of revenues and earnings are its insurance operations and its investments.
          The profitability of the Company’s insurance business is affected primarily by the adequacy of premium rates. The ultimate adequacy of premium rates is not known with certainty at the time a property casualty insurance policy is issued because premiums are determined before claims are reported. The ultimate adequacy of premium rates is affected mainly by the severity and frequency of claims, which are influenced by many factors, including natural and other disasters, regulatory measures and court decisions that define and change the extent of coverage and the effects of economic inflation on the amount of compensation for injuries or losses. General insurance prices are also influenced by available insurance capacity, i.e., the level of policyholders’ surplus employed in the industry, and the industry’s willingness to deploy that capital.
          Increased competition in the industry in recent years and the impact of the economic downturn have put pressure on pricing and terms and conditions. As property casualty insurance became more competitive, insurance rates decreased across most business lines from 2005 through 2008. Although this trend began to moderate in 2009, current market price levels for certain lines of business are below the prices required for the Company to achieve its return objectives. Price changes are reflected in the Company’s results over time as premiums are earned.
          The Company’s profitability is also affected by its investment income. The Company’s invested assets, which are derived from its own capital and cash flow from its insurance business, are invested principally in fixed maturity securities. The return on fixed maturity securities is affected primarily by general interest rates, which are at historically low levels, as well as the credit quality and duration of the securities. The Company also invests in equity securities, including those of financial institutions, merger arbitrage, private equity investments and real estate related investments.
Critical Accounting Estimates
          The following presents a discussion of accounting policies and estimates relating to reserves for losses and loss expenses, assumed premiums and investments. Management believes these policies and estimates are the most critical to its operations and require the most difficult, subjective and complex judgments.
          Reserves for Losses and Loss Expenses. To recognize liabilities for unpaid losses, either known or unknown, insurers establish reserves, which is a balance sheet account representing estimates of future amounts needed to pay claims and related expenses with respect to insured events which have occurred. Estimates and assumptions relating to reserves for losses and loss expenses are based on complex and subjective judgments, often including the interplay of specific uncertainties with related accounting and actuarial measurements. Such estimates are also susceptible to change as significant periods of time may elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the report of the loss to the insurer, the ultimate determination of the cost of the loss and the insurer’s payment of that loss.
          In general, when a claim is reported, claims personnel establish a “case reserve” for the estimated amount of the ultimate payment. The estimate represents an informed judgment based on general reserving practices and reflects the experience and knowledge of the claims personnel regarding the nature and value of the specific type of claim. Reserves are also established on an aggregate basis to provide for losses incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) to the insurer, potential inadequacy of case reserves and the estimated expenses of settling claims, including legal and other fees and general expenses of administrating the claims adjustment process. Reserves are established based upon the then current legal interpretation of coverage provided.
          In examining reserve adequacy, several factors are considered in addition to the economic value of losses. These factors include historical data, legal developments, changes in social attitudes and economic conditions, including the effects of inflation. The actuarial process relies on the basic assumption that past experience, adjusted judgmentally for the effects of current developments and anticipated trends, is an appropriate basis for predicting future outcomes. Reserve amounts are necessarily based on management’s informed estimates and judgments using currently available data. As additional experience and other data become available and are reviewed, these estimates and judgments may be revised. This may result in reserve increases or decreases that would be reflected in our results in periods in which such estimates and assumptions are changed.

20


 

          The risk and complexity of estimating loss reserves have increased under the current financial market conditions. It is especially difficult to estimate the impact of inflation on loss reserves given the current economic environment and related government actions. Whereas a slowing economy would generally lead to lower inflation or even deflation, increased government spending would generally lead to higher inflation. A change in our assumptions regarding inflation would result in reserve increases or decreases that would be reflected in our operations in periods in which such assumptions are changed.
          Reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability. Rather, reserves represent an estimate of what management expects the ultimate settlement and claim administration will cost. While the methods for establishing reserves are well tested over time, some of the major assumptions about anticipated loss emergence patterns are subject to unanticipated fluctuation. These estimates, which generally involve actuarial projections, are based on management’s assessment of facts and circumstances then known, as well as estimates of future trends in claims severity and frequency, judicial theories of liability and other factors, including the actions of third parties which are beyond the Company’s control. These variables are affected by external and internal events, such as inflation and economic volatility, judicial and litigation trends, reinsurance coverage, legislative changes and claim handling and reserving practices, which make it more difficult to accurately predict claim costs. The inherent uncertainties of estimating reserves are greater for certain types of liabilities where long periods of time elapse before a definitive determination of liability is made. Because setting reserves is inherently uncertain, the Company cannot assure that its current reserves will prove adequate in light of subsequent events.
          Loss reserves included in the Company’s financial statements represent management’s best estimates based upon an actuarially derived point estimate and other considerations. The Company uses a variety of actuarial techniques and methods to derive an actuarial point estimate for each operating unit. These methods include paid loss development, incurred loss development, paid and incurred Bornhuetter-Ferguson methods and frequency and severity methods. In circumstances where one actuarial method is considered more credible than the others, that method is used to set the point estimate. For example, the paid loss and incurred loss development methods rely on historical paid and incurred loss data. For new lines of business, where there is insufficient history of paid and incurred claims data, or in circumstances where there have been significant changes in claim practices, the paid and incurred loss development methods would be less credible than other actuarial methods. The actuarial point estimate may also be based on a judgmental weighting of estimates produced from each of the methods considered. Industry loss experience is used to supplement the Company’s own data in selecting “tail factors” and in areas where the Company’s own data is limited. The actuarial data is analyzed by line of business, coverage and accident or policy year, as appropriate, for each operating unit.
          The establishment of the actuarially derived loss reserve point estimate also includes consideration of qualitative factors that may affect the ultimate losses. These qualitative considerations include, among others, the impact of re-underwriting initiatives, changes in the mix of business, changes in distribution sources and changes in policy terms and conditions. Examples of changes in terms and conditions that can have a significant impact on reserve levels are the use of aggregate policy limits, the expansion of coverage exclusions, whether or not defense costs are within policy limits, and changes in deductibles and attachment points.
          The key assumptions used to arrive at the best estimate of loss reserves are the expected loss ratios, rate of loss cost inflation, and reported and paid loss emergence patterns. Expected loss ratios represent management’s expectation of losses at the time the business is written, before any actual claims experience has emerged. This expectation is a significant determinant of the estimate of loss reserves for recently written business where there is little paid or incurred loss data to consider. Expected loss ratios are generally derived from historical loss ratios adjusted for the impact of rate changes, loss cost trends and known changes in the type of risks underwritten. Expected loss ratios are estimated for each key line of business within each operating unit. Expected loss cost inflation is particularly important for the long-tail lines, such as excess casualty, and claims with a high medical component, such as workers’ compensation. Reported and paid loss emergence patterns are used to project current reported or paid loss amounts to their ultimate settlement value. Loss development factors are based on the historical emergence patterns of paid and incurred losses, and are derived from the Company’s own experience and industry data. The paid loss emergence pattern is also significant to excess and assumed workers’ compensation reserves because those reserves are discounted to their estimated present value based upon such estimated payout patterns. Management believes the estimates and assumptions it makes in the reserving process provide the best estimate of the ultimate cost of settling claims and related expenses with respect to insured events which have occurred; however, different assumptions and variables could lead to significantly different reserve estimates.

21


 

          Loss frequency and severity are measures of loss activity that are considered in determining the key assumptions described in our discussion of loss and loss expense reserves, including expected loss ratios, rate of loss cost inflation and reported and paid loss emergence patterns. Loss frequency is a measure of the number of claims per unit of insured exposure, and loss severity is a measure of the average size of claims. Factors affecting loss frequency include the effectiveness of loss controls and safety programs and changes in economic activity or weather patterns. Factors affecting loss severity include changes in policy limits, retentions, rate of inflation and judicial interpretations.
          Another factor affecting estimates of loss frequency and severity is the loss reporting lag, which is the period of time between the occurrence of a loss and the date the loss is reported to the Company. The length of the loss reporting lag affects our ability to accurately predict loss frequency (loss frequencies are more predictable for lines with short reporting lags) as well as the amount of reserves needed for incurred but not reported losses (less IBNR is required for lines with short reporting lags). As a result, loss reserves for lines with short reporting lags are likely to have less variation from initial loss estimates. For lines with short reporting lags, which include commercial automobile, primary workers’ compensation, other liability (claims-made) and property business, the key assumption is the loss emergence pattern used to project ultimate loss estimates from known losses paid or reported to date. For lines of business with long reporting lags, which include other liability (occurrence), products liability, excess workers’ compensation and liability reinsurance, the key assumption is the expected loss ratio since there is often little paid or incurred loss data to consider. Historically, the Company has experienced less variation from its initial loss estimates for lines of businesses with short reporting lags than for lines of business with long reporting lags.
          The key assumptions used in calculating the most recent estimate of the loss reserves are reviewed each quarter and adjusted, to the extent necessary, to reflect historical changes, current trends and other factors observed. If the actual level of loss frequency and severity are higher or lower than expected, the ultimate losses will be different than management’s estimate. The following table reflects the impact of changes (which could be favorable or unfavorable) in frequency and severity on our loss estimate for claims occurring in 2009 (dollars in thousands):
                         
    Frequency (+/-)
Severity (+/-)   1%   5%   10%
1%
    50,629       152,390       279,592  
5%
    152,390       258,182       390,422  
10%
    279,592       390,422       528,958  
          Our net reserves for losses and loss expenses of $8.1 billion as of June 30, 2010 relate to multiple accident years. Therefore, the impact of changes in frequency or severity for more than one accident year could be higher or lower than the amounts reflected above.
          Approximately $1.6 billion, or 20%, of the Company’s net loss reserves as of June 30, 2010 relate to assumed reinsurance business. There is a higher degree of uncertainty and greater variability regarding estimates of assumed loss reserves because those estimates are based, in part, upon information received from ceding companies. If information received from ceding companies is not timely or correct, the Company’s estimate of ultimate losses may not be accurate. Furthermore, due to delayed reporting of claim information by ceding companies, the claim settlement tail for assumed reinsurance is extended. Management considers the impact of delayed reporting in its selection of assumed loss development factors.
          Information received from ceding companies is used to set initial expected loss ratios, to establish case reserves and to estimate reserves for incurred but not reported losses on assumed reinsurance business. This information, which is generally provided through reinsurance intermediaries, is gathered through the underwriting process and from periodic claim reports and other correspondence with ceding companies. The Company performs underwriting and claim audits of selected ceding companies to determine the accuracy and completeness of information provided to the Company. The information received from the ceding companies is supplemented by the Company’s own loss development experience with similar lines of business as well as industry loss trends and loss development benchmarks.

22


 

          Following is a summary of the Company’s reserves for losses and loss expenses by business segment as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
                 
     (Dollars in thousands)   2010   2009
 
Specialty
  $ 2,918,548     $ 2,972,562  
Regional
    1,313,743       1,341,451  
Alternative markets
    1,819,608       1,771,114  
Reinsurance
    1,641,617       1,699,052  
International
    385,776       363,603  
 
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses
    8,079,292       8,147,782  
Ceded reserves for losses and loss expenses
    1,030,346       923,889  
 
Gross reserves for losses and loss expenses
  $ 9,109,638     $ 9,071,671  
 
          Following is a summary of the Company’s net reserves for losses and loss expenses by major line of business as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
                         
    Reported Case   Incurred But    
(Dollars in thousands)   Reserves   Not Reported   Total
 
June 30, 2010
                       
General liability
  $ 846,616     $ 2,094,183     $ 2,940,799  
Workers’ compensation (1)
    1,127,420       1,029,275       2,156,695  
Commercial automobile
    359,013       188,099       547,112  
International
    167,856       217,920       385,776  
Other
    159,380       247,913       407,293  
 
Total primary
    2,660,285       3,777,390       6,437,675  
Reinsurance (1)
    663,456       978,161       1,641,617  
 
Total
  $ 3,323,741     $ 4,755,551     $ 8,079,292  
 
 
                       
December 31, 2009
                       
General liability
  $ 845,889     $ 2,159,611     $ 3,005,500  
Workers’ compensation (1)
    1,094,800       1,019,552       2,114,352  
Commercial automobile
    393,534       196,060       589,594  
International
    145,807       217,796       363,603  
Other
    143,336       232,345       375,681  
 
Total primary
    2,623,366       3,825,364       6,448,730  
Reinsurance (1)
    688,593       1,010,459       1,699,052  
 
Total
  $ 3,311,959     $ 4,835,823     $ 8,147,782  
 
(1)   Workers’ compensation and reinsurance reserves are net of an aggregate net discount of $894 million and $877 million as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

23


 

          The following table presents development in our estimate of claims occurring in prior years for the three and six months ended June 30:
                                 
    For the Three Months   For the Six Months
    Ended June 30,   Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)   2010   2009   2010   2009
 
Favorable (unfavorable) reserve development:
                               
 
                               
Specialty
  $ 31,827     $ 21,774     $ 57,050     $ 39,319  
Regional
    29,560       4,466       49,628       14,440  
Alternative markets
    5,481       8,001       10,554       24,281  
Reinsurance
    8,880       15,798       30,395       22,606  
International
    864       (47 )     3,487       3,630  
     
Total favorable (unfavorable) reserve development
    76,612       49,992       151,114       104,276  
 
                               
Premium offsets (1):
                               
Specialty
    (2,205 )           (2,314 )      
Alternative markets
    279             (424 )      
Reinsurance
    (7,311 )     (16,834 )     (19,033 )     (16,834 )
 
Net development
  $ 67,375     $ 33,158     $ 129,343     $ 87,442  
 
(1)   Represents portion of favorable reserve development that was offset by a reduction in earned premiums.
          For the six months ended June 30, 2010, estimates for claims occurring in prior years decreased by $151 million, before premium offsets, and by $129 million, net of premium offsets. On an accident year basis, the change in prior year reserves for 2010 is comprised of an increase in estimates for claims occurring in accident years 2002 and prior of $23 million and a decrease in estimates for claims occurring in accident years 2003 through 2009 of $174 million. The changes in prior year loss reserve estimates are generally the result of ongoing analysis of recent loss development trends. Original estimates are increased or decreased as additional information becomes known regarding individual claims and aggregate claim trends.
          Specialty — The majority of the favorable reserve development for the specialty segment during 2010 and 2009 was associated with excess and surplus (“E&S”) business. E&S insurers are free from rate and form regulation and generally charge higher rates for business than those that are charged in the “standard” market. Beginning in 2003, the E&S business began to experience improved claim frequency (i.e., a lower number of reported claims per unit of exposure). One reason for the lower number of claims was the Company’s introduction of more restrictive policy language which included additional exclusions that eliminated claims that would have previously been covered, particularly for the Company’s building contractor business. In addition, as standard carriers tightened their underwriting criteria, the Company benefited from an influx of accounts from the standard market to the E&S market during these years. The more restrictive policy language and the influx of standard market business resulted in an improved risk profile within the E&S business and a reduction in loss costs that was not expected at the time loss reserves were initially established. We began to recognize those trends in 2007 and have continued to reduce our estimates of ultimate claim costs since then as the magnitude of the frequency trends has become more evident. The favorable reserve development in 2010 was primarily attributable to accident years 2006 through 2009. The favorable reserve development in 2009 was primarily attributable to accident years 2004 through 2007.
          Regional — The favorable reserve development for the regional segment during 2010 was primarily related to commercial multi-peril, commercial automobile and workers’ compensation business. The favorable reserve development resulted mainly from lower loss emergence on known case reserves relative to historical levels. The favorable reserve development also reflects lower than anticipated claim frequency on commercial automobile business, which the Company believes is due, in part, to a reduction in miles driven by insured vehicles as a result of the economic downturn. The favorable reserve development in 2010 was primarily attributable to accident years 2006 through 2009.
          Reinsurance — Estimates for claims occurring in prior years decreased by $11 million, net of premium offsets, for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The majority of the favorable development for the reinsurance segment during 2010 was related to the Company’s participation in a Lloyd’s of London syndicate. The favorable development resulted from a re-evaluation of the syndicate’s loss reserves for underwriting years 2008 through 2009 in connection with its annual year-end review of loss reserves that was completed in the first quarter of 2010.

24


 

          Loss Reserve Discount — The Company discounts its liabilities for excess and assumed workers’ compensation business because of the long period of time over which losses are paid. Discounting is intended to appropriately match losses and loss expenses to income earned on investment securities supporting the liabilities. The expected losses and loss expense payout pattern subject to discounting was derived from the Company’s loss payout experience. For non-proportional business, reserves for losses and loss expenses have been discounted using risk-free discount rates determined by reference to the U.S. Treasury yield curve. For proportional business, reserves for losses and loss expenses have been discounted at the statutory rate permitted by the Department of Insurance of the State of Delaware of 2.7%. As of June 30, 2010, the aggregate blended discount rates ranged from 2.7% to 6.5%, with a weighted average discount rate of 4.4%. The aggregate net discount, after reflecting the effects of ceded reinsurance, was $894 million and $877 million as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
          Assumed Reinsurance Premiums. The Company estimates the amount of assumed reinsurance premiums that it will receive under treaty reinsurance agreements at the inception of the contracts. These premium estimates are revised as the actual amount of assumed premiums is reported to the Company by the ceding companies. As estimates of assumed premiums are made or revised, the related amount of earned premium, commissions and incurred losses associated with those premiums are recorded. Estimated assumed premiums receivable were approximately $102 million and $71 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The assumed premium estimates are based upon terms set forth in the reinsurance agreement, information received from ceding companies during the underwriting and negotiation of the agreement, reports received from ceding companies and discussions and correspondence with reinsurance intermediaries. The Company also considers its own view of market conditions, economic trends and experience with similar lines of business. These premium estimates represent management’s best estimate of the ultimate amount of premiums to be received under its assumed reinsurance agreements.
          Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (OTTI) of Investments. The cost of securities is adjusted where appropriate to include a provision for decline in value which is considered to be other-than-temporary. An other-than- temporary decline is considered to occur in investments where there has been a sustained reduction in market value and where the Company does not expect the fair value to recover prior to the time of sale or maturity. Since equity securities do not have a contractual cash flow or maturity, the Company considers whether the price of an equity security is expected to recover within a reasonable period of time.
          The Company classifies its fixed maturity securities and preferred stocks by credit rating, primarily based on ratings assigned by credit rating agencies. For purposes of classifying securities with different ratings, the Company uses the lower rating if two ratings were assigned and the middle rating if three ratings were assigned, unless the Company’s own analysis indicates that the lower rating is more appropriate. Securities that are not rated by a rating agency are evaluated and classified by the Company on a case-by-case basis. Unrated securities with an aggregate fair value of $6 million were classified as investment grade at June 30, 2010.
          Fixed Maturity Securities — For securities that we intend to sell or, more likely than not, would be required to sell, a decline in value below amortized cost is considered to be OTTI. The amount of OTTI is equal to the difference between amortized cost and fair value at the balance sheet date. For securities that we do not intend to sell or expect to be required to sell, a decline in value below amortized cost is considered to be an OTTI if we do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of a security (i.e., the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis of the security).
          The portion of the decline in value considered to be a credit loss (i.e., the difference between the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis of the security) is recognized in earnings. The portion of the decline in value not considered to be a credit loss (i.e., the difference in the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and the fair value of the security) is recognized in other comprehensive income.
          Impairment assessments for structured securities, including mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations and corporate debt, are generally evaluated based on the performance of the underlying collateral under various economic and default scenarios that may involve subjective judgments and estimates by management. Modeling these securities involves various factors, such as projected default rates, the nature and realizable value of the collateral, if any, the ability of the issuer to make scheduled payments, historical performance and other relevant economic and performance factors. If an OTTI determination is made, a discounted cash flow analysis is used to ascertain the amount of the credit impairment.

25


 

          The following table provides a summary of all fixed maturity securities as of June 30, 2010 by the length of time those securities have been continuously in an unrealized loss position:
                         
    Number of   Aggregate   Unrealize
(Dollars in thousands)   Securities   Fair Value   Loss
 
Unrealized loss less than 20% of amortized cost
    138     $ 1,033,120     $ 54,954  
 
                       
Unrealized loss of 20% or greater:
                       
Less than twelve months
    3       5,270       1,842  
Twelve months and longer
    8       58,101       23,600  
 
Total
    149     $ 1,096,491     $ 80,396  
 
          A summary of the Company’s non-investment grade fixed maturity securities that were in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2010 is presented in the table below:
                         
                    Gross
    Number of   Aggregate   Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)   Securities   Fair Value   Loss
 
Unrealized loss less than $5 million:
                       
Mortgage-backed securities
    8     $ 76,949     $ 7,687  
Corporate
    8       34,286       5,321  
State and municipal
    5       38,823       5,244  
Foreign
    10       19,833       975  
Unrealized loss $5 million or more
                       
Mortgage-backed security (1)
    1       29,970       7,030  
 
Total
    32     $ 199,861     $ 26,257  
 
(1)   This investment is secured by 99 properties comprising approximately 30 million square feet of office space located primarily in Boston, Northern California and Los Angeles. The current debt maturity of February 2011 can be extended at the borrower’s option through February 2012 provided that there is no continuing default. The Company believes the amount of outstanding debt for the Company’s debt layer and all debt layers senior to the Company’s debt layer to be below the current fair values for the underlying properties. Based on the portfolio’s stable performance (e.g., occupancy rates, lease terms and debt service coverage) and on there being substantial subordinate capital, the Company does not consider the investment to be OTTI.
          The Company has evaluated its fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position and believes the unrealized losses are due primarily to temporary market and sector-related factors rather than to issuer-specific factors. None of these securities are delinquent or in default on financial covenants. Based on its assessment of these issuers, the Company expects them to continue to meet their contractual payment obligations as they become due and does not consider any of these securities to be OTTI.
          Preferred Stocks — At June 30, 2010, there were ten preferred stocks in an unrealized loss position, with an aggregate fair value of $160 million and a gross unrealized loss of $22 million. Four of the securities (with an aggregate fair value of $27 million and a gross unrealized loss of $12 million) had an unrealized loss of greater than 20%. Two of these securities (with an aggregate fair value of $3 million and an aggregate unrealized loss of $3 million) are rated non-investment grade. The Company does not consider any of these securities to be OTTI.
          Common Stocks - At June 30, 2010, the Company owned four common stocks in an unrealized loss position with an aggregate fair value of $31 million and an aggregate unrealized loss of $4 million. The Company does not consider these securities to be OTTI.
          Loans Receivable - The Company monitors the performance of its loans receivable, including current market conditions for each loan and the ability to collect principal and interest. For loans where the Company determines it is probable that the contractual terms will not be met, a valuation reserve is established with a charge to net realized capital losses. Loans receivable are reported net of a valuation reserve of $16.4 million and $13.8 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

26


 

          Fair Value Measurements. The Company’s fixed maturity and equity securities available for sale and its trading account securities are carried at fair value. Fair value is defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” The Company utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for similar assets in active markets. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs may only be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available. The fair value of the vast majority of the Company’s portfolio is based on observable data (other than quoted prices) and, accordingly, is classified as Level 2.
          In classifying particular financial securities in the fair value hierarchy, the Company uses its judgment to determine whether the market for a security is active and whether significant pricing inputs are observable. The Company determines the existence of an active market by assessing whether transactions occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide reliable pricing information. The Company determines whether inputs are observable based on the use of such information by pricing services and external investment managers, the uninterrupted availability of such inputs, the need to make significant adjustments to such inputs and the volatility of such inputs over time. If the market for a security is determined to be inactive or if significant inputs used to price a security are determined to be unobservable, the security is categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
          Because many fixed maturity securities do not trade on a daily basis, the Company utilizes pricing models and processes which may include benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing. Market inputs used to evaluate securities include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. Quoted prices are often unavailable for recently issued securities, securities that are infrequently traded or securities that are only traded in private transactions. For publicly traded securities for which quoted prices are unavailable, the Company determines fair value based on independent broker quotations and other observable market data. For securities traded only in private negotiations, the Company determines fair value based primarily on the cost of such securities, which is adjusted to reflect prices of recent placements of securities of the same issuer, financial data, projections and business developments of the issuer and other relevant information.
          The following table summarizes pricing methods for fixed maturity securities available for sale as of June 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
                 
    Carrying     Percent  
    Value     of Total  
Pricing source:
               
Independent pricing services
  $ 10,379,239       94.1 %
Syndicate manager
    119,408       1.1 %
Directly by the Company based on:
               
Observable data
    452,343       4.1 %
Par value
    1,250       0.0 %
Cash flow model
    77,272       0.7 %
 
Total
  $ 11,029,512       100.0 %
 
          Independent pricing services — The vast majority of the Company’s fixed maturity securities available for sale were priced by independent pricing services (generally one U.S. pricing service plus additional pricing services with respect to a limited number of foreign securities held by the Company). The prices provided by the independent pricing services are generally based on observable market data in active markets (e.g., broker quotes and prices observed for comparable securities). The determination of whether markets are active or inactive is based upon the volume and level of activity for a particular asset class. The Company conducts interviews with the pricing services to gain an understanding of how different types of securities are priced. The Company reviews the prices provided by pricing services for reasonableness based upon current trading levels for similar securities. If the prices appear unusual to the Company, they are re-examined and the value is either confirmed or revised. In addition, the Company periodically performs independent price tests of a sample of securities to ensure proper valuation and to verify our understanding of how securities are priced. As of June 30, 2010, the Company did not make any adjustments to the prices provided by the pricing services. Based upon the Company’s review of the methodologies used by the independent pricing services, these securities were classified as Level 2.

27


 

          Syndicate manager — The Company has a 15% participation in a Lloyd’s syndicate, and the Company’s share of the securities owned by the syndicate is priced by the syndicate’s manager. The majority of the securities are liquid, short duration fixed maturity securities. The Company reviews the syndicate manager’s pricing methodology and audited financial statements and holds discussions with the syndicate manager as necessary to confirm its understanding and agreement with security prices. Based upon the Company’s review of the methodologies used by the syndicate manager, these securities were classified as Level 2.
          Observable data — If independent pricing is not available, the Company prices the securities directly. Prices are based on observable market data where available, including current trading levels for similar securities and non-binding quotations from brokers. The Company generally requests two or more quotes. If more than one quote is received, the Company sets a price within the range of quotes received based on its assessment of the credibility of the quote and its own evaluation of the security. The Company generally does not adjust quotes obtained from brokers. Since these securities were priced based on observable data, they were classified as Level 2.
          Par value — Bonds that can be put to the issuer at par in the near-term are priced at par provided there are no significant concerns with the issuer’s ability to repay. These securities were classified as Level 2.
          Cash flow model — If the above methodologies are not available, the Company prices securities using a discounted cash flow model based upon assumptions as to prevailing credit spreads, interest rates and interest rate volatility, time to maturity and subordination levels. Discount rates are adjusted to reflect illiquidity where appropriate. These securities were classified as Level 3.

28


 

Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Business Segment Results
          Following is a summary of gross and net premiums written, premiums earned, loss ratios (losses and loss expenses incurred expressed as a percentage of premiums earned), expense ratios (underwriting expenses expressed as a percentage of premiums earned) and combined GAAP ratios (sum of loss ratio and expense ratio) for each of our business segments for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The combined ratio represents a measure of underwriting profitability, excluding investment income. A combined ratio in excess of 100 indicates an underwriting loss; a number below 100 indicates an underwriting profit.
                 
    For the Six Months
    Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)   2010   2009
 
Specialty
               
Gross premiums written
  $ 747,339     $ 759,783  
Net premiums written
    644,203       661,240  
Premiums earned
    629,466       703,980  
Loss ratio
    57.6 %     61.4 %
Expense ratio
    33.2 %     30.3 %
GAAP combined ratio
    90.8 %     91.7 %
 
Regional
               
Gross premiums written
  $ 589,352     $ 640,246  
Net premiums written
    530,575       559,765  
Premiums earned
    530,298       567,519  
Loss ratio
    59.7 %     63.8 %
Expense ratio
    35.5 %     33.6 %
GAAP combined ratio
    95.2 %     97.4 %
 
Alternative Markets
               
Gross premiums written
  $ 387,950     $ 362,834  
Net premiums written
    327,497       325,201  
Premiums earned
    310,012       303,302  
Loss ratio
    64.9 %     64.3 %
Expense ratio
    25.8 %     24.9 %
GAAP combined ratio
    90.7 %     89.2 %
 
Reinsurance
               
Gross premiums written
  $ 221,015     $ 224,073  
Net premiums written
    206,404       207,888  
Premiums earned
    205,190       199,880  
Loss ratio
    53.1 %     60.1 %
Expense ratio
    42.4 %     39.1 %
GAAP combined ratio
    95.5 %     99.2 %
 
International
               
Gross premiums written
  $ 293,933     $ 215,883  
Net premiums written
    236,625       178,290  
Premiums earned
    203,723       155,699  
Loss ratio
    64.4 %     63.0 %
Expense ratio
    42.4 %     38.2 %
GAAP combined ratio
    106.8 %     101.2 %
 
Consolidated
               
Gross premiums written
  $ 2,239,589     $ 2,202,819  
Net premiums written
    1,945,304       1,932,384  
Premiums earned
    1,878,689       1,930,380  
Loss ratio
    59.6 %     62.6 %
Expense ratio
    34.6 %     32.0 %
GAAP combined ratio
    94.2 %     94.6 %
 

29


 

          Net Income to Common Stockholders. The following table presents the Company’s net income to common stockholders and net income per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
                 
    2010     2009  
Net income to common stockholders
  $ 228,817     $ 77,041  
Weighted average diluted shares
    158,539       166,716  
Net income per diluted share
  $ 1.44     $ 0.46  
          The Company reported net income of $229 million in 2010 compared to $77 million in 2009. The increase in net income is primarily due to improved investment results. Income from investment funds (which is recorded on a one quarter lag) was $6 million in 2010 compared with a loss of $153 million in 2009. Other-than-temporary investment impairments were $3 million in 2010 compared with $134 million in 2009. The number of weighted average diluted shares decreased as a result of the Company’s repurchases of its common stock in 2010 and 2009.
          Premiums Written. Gross premiums written were $2,240 million in 2010, an increase of 2% from 2009. Gross premiums for recently started operating units (companies that began operations since 2006) were up 49% to $378 million in 2010 from $253 million in 2009, and comprised 17% of our gross premiums written for the six months. Approximately 79% of policies expiring in 2010 were renewed, compared with 76% of policies expiring in the first six months of 2009 that were renewed. The average price of policies renewed in 2010 declined 0.5% from the same period in 2009.
          Increased competition in the industry in recent years and the impact of the economic downturn have put pressure on pricing and terms and conditions. As property casualty insurance became more competitive, insurance rates decreased across most business lines beginning in 2005. Although this trend began to moderate in 2009, current market price levels for certain lines of business are below the prices required for the Company to achieve its return objectives. In particular, commercial automobile and products liability in the specialty segment experienced significant declines in gross written premiums in the six months ended June 30, 2010. A summary of gross premiums written in 2010 compared with 2009 by line of business within each business segment follows:
    Specialty gross premiums decreased by 2% to $747 million in 2010 from $760 million in 2009. Gross premiums written decreased 36% for commercial automobile and 24% for products liability, increased 11% for property lines and 3% for professional liability, and were unchanged for premises operations.
 
    Regional gross premiums decreased by 8% to $589 million in 2010 from $640 million in 2009. Gross premiums written decreased 9% for workers’ compensation, 6% for commercial automobile and 5% for commercial multiple perils. Gross premiums include assigned risk premiums, which are fully reinsured, of $19 million in 2010 and $40 million in 2009.
 
    Alternative markets gross premiums increased by 7% to $388 million in 2010 from $363 million in 2009. Gross premiums written increased 4% for primary workers’ compensation and decreased 13% for excess workers’ compensation. Gross premiums include assigned risk premiums, which are fully reinsured, of $36 million in 2010 and $10 million in 2009.
 
    Reinsurance gross premiums decreased by 1% to $221 million in 2010 from $224 million in 2009. Casualty gross premiums written decreased 16% to $149 million due to return premiums on experience rated reinsurance contracts (where premiums are adjusted over time based on the level of loss activity). Property gross premiums written increased 56% to $72 million due to two new non-catastrophe exposed property treaties.
 
    International gross premiums increased by 36% to $294 million in 2010 from $216 million in 2009. The increase is primarily due to an increase in business written by our new operating units in Lloyd’s, Canada and Norway. These increases were partially offset by a decline in premiums written in Korea.
          Ceded reinsurance premiums as a percentage of gross written premiums increased to 13% in 2010 from 12% in 2009. The increase was primarily due to ceded premiums for recently started operating units, which have a higher ceded premium percentage than mature operating units. Net premiums written were $1,945 million in 2010, an increase of 1% from 2009.

30


 

          Net Premiums Earned. Premiums earned decreased 3% to $1,879 million in 2010 from $1,930 million in 2009. Insurance premiums are earned ratably over the policy term, and therefore premiums earned in 2010 are related to business written during both 2010 and 2009. The 3% decrease in 2010 earned premiums reflects the underlying decline in net premiums written in 2009.
          Net Investment Income. Following is a summary of net investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
                                 
                    Average Annualized  
    Amount     Yield  
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Fixed maturity securities, including cash
  $ 250,758     $ 242,598       4.2 %     4.2 %
Arbitrage trading account and funds
    12,354       17,599       3.5 %     8.5 %
Equity securities available for sale
    5,993       12,074       3.9 %     6.8 %
 
Gross investment income
    269,105       272,271       4.2 %     4.5 %
Investment expenses
    (2,071 )     (1,920 )                
 
Total
  $ 267,034     $ 270,351       4.1 %     4.4 %
 
          Net investment income decreased 1% to $267 million in 2010 from $270 million in 2009. The decrease in investment income is due to a decline in the yield for the arbitrage account and equity securities, partially offset by an increase in average invested assets. Average invested assets, at cost (including cash and cash equivalents) were $12.9 billion in 2010 and $12.2 billion in 2009.
          Income (Losses) from Investment Funds. Following is a summary of income (losses) from investment funds (which is recorded on a one-quarter lag) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
                 
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009  
 
Real estate funds
  $ (3,906 )   $ (132,828 )
Energy funds
    13,949       (18,417 )
Other funds
    (3,785 )     (1,650 )
 
Total
  $ 6,258     $ (152,895 )
 
          Income from investment funds was $6 million in 2010 compared to a loss of $153 million in 2009, primarily as a result of lower losses from real estate funds. The real estate funds, which had an aggregate carrying value of $199 million at June 30, 2010, invest in commercial loans and securities as well as direct property ownership. In 2009, asset values were impacted by general deterioration of real estate fundamentals coupled with the absence of a refinancing market and an increase in non-performing assets. Although these market conditions have moderated, a large number of real estate projects remain over-leveraged and face near-term refinancing pressure. The energy funds reported income of $14 million in 2010 due to an increase in the fair value of energy related investments held by the funds.
          Insurance Service Fees. Insurance service fees consists of fee-based services to help clients develop and administer self-insurance programs, primarily for workers’ compensation coverage as well as brokerage services. Service fees decreased to $42 million in 2010 from $52 million in 2009 due to a decline in fees received for administering assigned risk plans as a result of a decrease in workers’ compensation premiums written by those plans.
          Net Realized Gains on Investment Sales. The Company buys and sells securities on a regular basis in order to maximize its total return on investments. Decisions to sell securities are based on management’s view of the underlying fundamentals of specific securities as well as management’s expectations regarding interest rates, credit spreads, currency values and general economic conditions. Net realized gains on investment sales were $20 million in 2010 compared with $63 million in 2009.
          Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. Other-than-temporary impairments were $3 million in 2010 compared with $134 million in 2009. The impairment charge in 2009 was primarily related to debt and preferred stock of major financial institutions that experienced adverse credit events and ratings downgrades during the period, including write-downs of debt issued by Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. and preferred stock issued by Citibank and Bank of America.
          Revenues from Wholly-Owned Investees. Revenues from wholly-owned investees were $105 million in 2010 compared with $81 million in 2009. These revenues were derived from aviation-related businesses that were separately purchased in 2007, 2008 and 2009. These companies provide services to the general aviation market, including fuel and line

31


 

service, aircraft sales and maintenance, avionics and engineering services and parts fabrication. The 2010 and 2009 revenues are not comparable since the Company acquired one of its aviation companies in June 2009.
          Losses and Loss Expenses. Losses and loss expenses decreased to $1,120 million in 2010 from $1,208 million in 2009 due to lower earned premiums. The consolidated loss ratio was 59.6% in 2010 compared with 62.6% in 2009. Weather-related losses were $53 million in 2010 (including $8 million from the earthquake in Chile) compared with $36 million in 2009. Favorable prior year reserve development, net of related premium adjustments, was $129 million in 2010 and $87 million in 2009. A summary of loss ratios in 2010 compared with 2009 by business segment follows:
    Specialty’s loss ratio decreased to 57.6% in 2010 from 61.4% in 2009 due to an increase in favorable reserve development. Net favorable prior year development, net of related premium adjustments, was $55 million in 2010 compared with $39 million in 2009.
 
    Regional’s loss ratio decreased to 59.7% in 2010 from 63.8% in 2009 due to an increase in favorable reserve development, partially offset by storm losses. Weather-related losses were $45 million in 2010 compared with $36 million in 2009. Net favorable prior year development was $50 million in 2010 compared with $14 million in 2009.
 
    Alternative markets’ loss ratio increased to 64.9% in 2010 from 64.3% in 2009 due to a decrease in favorable reserve development, partially offset by the use of higher discount rates used to discount excess workers’ compensation reserves. Net favorable prior year reserve development, net of related premium adjustments, was $10 million in 2010 compared with $24 million in 2009.
 
    Reinsurance’s loss ratio decreased to 53.1% in 2010 from 60.1% in 2009 due to lower loss ratios for several large property treaties and to an increase in favorable reserve development. Net favorable prior year development, net of related premium adjustments, was $11 million in 2010 compared with $6 million in 2009. Losses from the earthquake in Chile in 2010 were $4 million.
 
    International’s loss ratio increased to 64.4% in 2010 from 63.0% in 2009 due primarily to losses from the Chilean earthquake of $4 million. Net favorable prior year development was $3 million in 2010 compared with $4 million in 2009.
           Other Operating Costs and Expenses. Following is a summary of other operating costs and expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
                 
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009  
 
Underwriting expenses
  $ 650,202     $ 616,926  
Service expenses
    36,955       42,560  
Net foreign currency (gains) losses
    (3,711 )     5,959  
Other costs and expenses
    55,344       57,416  
 
Total
  $ 738,790     $ 722,861  
 
          Underwriting expenses are comprised of commissions paid to agents and brokers, premium taxes and other assessments and internal underwriting costs. The expense ratio (underwriting expenses expressed as a percentage of premiums earned) increased to 34.6% in 2010 from 32.0% in 2009 primarily due to the decline in earned premiums, higher commission rates for certain reinsurance contracts and higher expenses related to recently started business operations. Recently started business operations have a relatively higher expense ratio due to their early stage of development, particularly in our international segment.
          Service expenses, which represent the costs associated with the fee-based businesses, decreased 13% to $37 million due to lower employment costs and lower direct cost associated with the lower assigned risk business revenues.
          Net foreign currency (gains) losses result from transactions denominated in a currency other than the operating unit’s functional currency. The gain in 2010 was primarily attributable to foreign operating units holding assets denominated in U.S. dollars.
          Other costs and expenses, which represent corporate expenses, decreased 4% to $55 million due to an decrease in general and administrative costs, including employment costs.

32


 

          Expenses from Wholly-Owned Investees. Expenses from wholly-owned investees were $99 million in 2010 compared to $77 million in 2009. These expenses represent costs associated with aviation-related businesses that were separately purchased in 2007, 2008 and 2009. These include cost of goods sold related to aircraft and other sales, labor and equipment costs related to repairs and other services and general and administrative expenses. The 2010 and 2009 expenses are not comparable since the Company acquired one of its aviation companies in June 2009.
          Interest Expense. Interest expense increased 29% to $52 million due to the issuance of $300 million of 7.375% senior notes in September 2009.
          Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate was an expense of 25% in 2010 as compared to a benefit of 9% in 2009. The effective income tax rate differs from the federal income tax rate of 35% primarily because of tax-exempt investment income. The tax exempt investment income is a greater portion of the 2009 pre-tax income and as such had a larger impact to the effective tax rate for 2009.

33


 

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Business Segment Results
          Following is a summary of gross and net premiums written, premiums earned, loss ratios (losses and loss expenses incurred expressed as a percentage of premiums earned), expense ratios (underwriting expenses expressed as a percentage of premiums earned) and combined GAAP ratios (sum of loss ratio and expense ratio) for each of our business segments for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The combined ratio represents a measure of underwriting profitability, excluding investment income. A combined ratio in excess of 100 indicates an underwriting loss; a number below 100 indicates an underwriting profit.
                 
    For the Three Months
    Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)   2010   2009
 
Specialty
               
Gross premiums written
  $ 404,407     $ 394,889  
Net premiums written
    342,275       338,683  
Premiums earned
    316,513       346,052  
Loss ratio
    57.2 %     60.0 %
Expense ratio
    32.7 %     29.8 %
GAAP combined ratio
    89.9 %     89.8 %
 
Regional
               
Gross premiums written
  $ 286,711     $ 317,445  
Net premiums written
    258,543       277,730  
Premiums earned
    266,629       281,903  
Loss ratio
    62.2 %     66.6 %
Expense ratio
    35.5 %     34.2 %
GAAP combined ratio
    97.7 %     100.8 %
 
Alternative Markets
               
Gross premiums written
  $ 146,599     $ 113,960  
Net premiums written
    117,092       99,486  
Premiums earned
    155,227       151,309  
Loss ratio
    65.2 %     66.4 %
Expense ratio
    26.0 %     25.7 %
GAAP combined ratio
    91.2 %     92.1 %
 
Reinsurance
               
Gross premiums written
  $ 114,646     $ 116,217  
Net premiums written
    107,633       107,055  
Premiums earned
    105,632       94,257  
Loss ratio
    55.7 %     56.4 %
Expense ratio
    41.0 %     42.9 %
GAAP combined ratio
    96.7 %     99.3 %
 
International
               
Gross premiums written
  $ 161,106     $ 112,066  
Net premiums written
    135,811       85,958  
Premiums earned
    104,127       77,651  
Loss ratio
    61.1 %     61.9 %
Expense ratio
    41.2 %     38.8 %
GAAP combined ratio
    102.3 %     100.7 %
 
Consolidated
               
Gross premiums written
  $ 1,113,469     $ 1,054,577  
Net premiums written
    961,354       908,912  
Premiums earned
    948,128       951,172  
Loss ratio
    60.2 %     62.8 %
Expense ratio
    34.2 %     32.5 %
GAAP combined ratio
    94.4 %     95.3 %
 

34


 

          Net Income to Common Stockholders. The following table presents the Company’s net income to common stockholders and net income per diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
                 
    2010     2009  
Net income to common stockholders
  $ 110,207     $ 97,387  
Weighted average diluted shares
    157,461       166,226  
Net income per diluted share
  $ 0.70     $ 0.59  
          The Company reported net income of $110 million in 2010 compared to $97 million in 2009. The increase in net income is primarily due to improved investment results. Income from investment funds (which is recorded on a one quarter lag) was $2 million in 2010 compared with a loss of $38 million in 2009. There were no other than temporary investment impairments in 2010 compared with $24 million in 2009. The number of weighted average diluted shares decreased as a result of the Company’s repurchases of its common stock in 2010 and 2009.
          Premiums Written. Gross premiums written were $1,113 million in 2010, an increase of 6% from 2009. Gross premiums for recently started operating units (companies that began operations since 2006) were up 60% to $212 million in 2010 from $133 million in 2009, and comprised 19% of our gross premiums written in the quarter. Approximately 77% of business expiring in 2010 was renewed, and the average price of policies renewed in 2010 declined 1% from the same period in 2009.
          Increased competition in the industry in recent years and the impact of the economic downturn have put pressure on pricing and terms and conditions. As property casualty insurance became more competitive, insurance rates decreased across most business lines beginning in 2005. Although this trend began to moderate in 2009, current market price levels for certain lines of business are below the prices required for the Company to achieve its return objectives. In particular, commercial automobile and products liability in the specialty segment experienced significant declines in gross written premiums in the three months ended June 30, 2010. A summary of gross premiums written in 2010 compared with 2009 by line of business within each business segment follows:
    Specialty gross premiums increased by 2% to $404 million in 2010 from $395 million in 2009. Gross premiums written decreased 36% for commercial automobile and 18% for products liability, and increased 14% for property lines, 5% for premises operations and 3% for professional liability.
 
    Regional gross premiums decreased by 10% to $287 million in 2010 from $317 million in 2009. Gross premiums written decreased 15% for workers’ compensation, 7% for commercial automobile and 5% for commercial multiple perils. Gross premiums include assigned risk premiums, which are fully reinsured, of $9 million in 2010 and $19 million in 2009.
 
    Alternative markets gross premiums increased by 29% to $147 million in 2010 from $114 million in 2009. Gross premiums written increased 20% for excess workers’ compensation and 12% for primary workers’ compensation. Gross premiums include assigned risk premiums, which are fully reinsured, of $20 million in 2010 and $4 million in 2009.
 
    Reinsurance gross premiums decreased by 1% to $115 million in 2010 from $116 million in 2009. Casualty gross premiums written decreased 18% to $75 million due to return premiums on experience rated reinsurance contracts (where premiums are adjusted over time based on the level of loss activity). Property gross premiums written increased 60% to $40 million due to two new non-catastrophe exposed property treaties.
 
    International gross premiums increased by 44% to $161 million in 2010 from $112 million in 2009. The increase is primarily due to an increase in business written by our new operating units in Lloyd’s, Canada and Norway.
          Ceded reinsurance premiums as a percentage of gross written premiums were 14% in 2010 and 2009. Net premiums written were $961 million in 2010, an increase of 6% from 2009.

35


 

          Net Premiums Earned. Premiums earned decreased to $948 million in 2010 from $951 million in 2009. Insurance premiums are earned ratably over the policy term, and therefore premiums earned in 2010 are related to business written during both 2010 and 2009. The slight decrease in 2010 earned premiums reflects the underlying decline in net premiums written in 2009.
     Net Investment Income. Following is a summary of net investment income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
                                 
                    Average Annualized  
    Amount     Yield  
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Fixed maturity securities, including cash
  $ 125,649     $ 120,211       4.2 %     4.2 %
Arbitrage trading account and funds
    1,131       6,938       0.6 %     5.7 %
Equity securities available for sale
    2,628       6,010       3.5 %     7.5 %
 
Gross investment income
    129,408       133,159       4.0 %     4.4 %
Investment expenses
    (1,217 )     (1,024 )                
 
Total
  $ 128,191     $ 132,135       4.0 %     4.3 %
 
          Net investment income decreased 3% to $128 million in 2010 from $132 million in 2009. The decrease in investment income is due primarily to a decline in the yield for the arbitrage account. Average invested assets, at cost (including cash and cash equivalents) were $12.8 billion in 2010 and $12.2 billion in 2009.
          Income (Losses) from Investment Funds. Following is a summary of income (losses) from investment funds (which is recorded on a one-quarter lag) for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
                 
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009  
 
Real estate funds
  $ 2,440     $ (34,320 )
Energy funds
    232       (3,726 )
Other funds
    (1,132 )     225  
 
Total
  $ 1,540     $ (37,821 )
 
          Income from investment funds was $2 million in 2010 compared to a loss of $38 million in 2009, primarily as a result of income from real estate funds in 2010 as compared to losses from real estate funds in 2009. The real estate funds, which had an aggregate carrying value of $199 million at June 30, 2010, invest in commercial loans and securities as well as direct property ownership. In 2009, asset values were impacted by general deterioration of real estate fundamentals coupled with the absence of a refinancing market and an increase in non-performing assets. Although these conditions have moderated, a large number of real estate projects remain over-leveraged and face near-term refinancing pressure.
          Insurance Service Fees. Insurance service fees consists of fee-based services to help clients develop and administer self-insurance programs, primarily for workers’ compensation coverage as well as brokerage services. Service fees decreased to $20 million in 2010 from $25 million in 2009 due to a decline in fees received for administering assigned risk plans as a result of a decrease in workers’ compensation premiums by those plans.
          Net Realized Gains on Investment Sales. The Company buys and sells securities on a regular basis in order to maximize its total return on investments. Decisions to sell securities are based on management’s view of the underlying fundamentals of specific securities as well as management’s expectations regarding interest rates, credit spreads, currency values and general economic conditions. Net realized gains on investment sales were $12 million in 2010 compared with $49 million in 2009.
          Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. There were no other-than-temporary impairments in 2010 compared with $24 million in 2009. The impairment charge in 2009 was primarily related to a further decline of a common stock that had been previously written down to fair value.
          Revenues from Wholly-Owned Investees. Revenues from wholly-owned investees were $53 million in 2010 compared with $50 million in 2009. These revenues were derived from aviation-related businesses that were separately purchased in 2007, 2008 and 2009. These companies provide services to the general aviation market, including fuel and line service, aircraft sales and maintenance, avionics and engineering services and parts fabrication. The 2010 and 2009 revenues are not comparable since the Company acquired one of its aviation companies in June 2009.

36


 

          Losses and Loss Expenses. Losses and loss expenses decreased to $570 million in 2010 from $597 million in 2009 due to lower earned premiums. The consolidated loss ratio was 60.2% in 2010 compared with 62.8% in 2009. Weather-related losses were $30 million in 2010 compared with $28 million in 2009. Favorable prior year reserve development, net of related premium adjustments, was $67 million in 2010 and $33 million in 2009. A summary of loss ratios in 2010 compared with 2009 by business segment follows:
    Specialty’s loss ratio decreased to 57.2% in 2010 from 60.0% in 2009 due to an increase in favorable reserve development. Net favorable prior year development, net of related premium adjustments, was $30 million in 2010 compared with $22 million in 2009.
 
    Regional’s loss ratio decreased to 62.2% in 2010 from 66.6% in 2009 due to an increase in favorable reserve development. Weather-related losses were $30 million in 2010 compared with $28 million in 2009. Net favorable prior year development was $29 million in 2010 compared with $4 million in 2009.
 
    Alternative markets’ loss ratio decreased to 65.2% in 2010 from 66.4% in 2009 due to the use of higher discount rates used to discount excess workers’ compensation reserves, partially offset by a decrease in favorable reserve development. Net favorable prior year reserve development, net of related premium adjustments, was $6 million in 2010 compared with $8 million in 2009.
 
    Reinsurance’s loss ratio decreased to 55.7% in 2010 from 56.4% in 2009. Net favorable prior year development, net of related premium adjustments, was $1 million in 2010 compared with unfavorable prior year development of $1 million in 2009.
 
    International’s loss ratio decreased to 61.1% in 2010 from 61.9% in 2009. Net favorable prior year development was $1 million in 2010 compared with none in 2009.
           Other Operating Costs and Expenses. Following is a summary of other operating costs and expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
                 
(Dollars in thousands)   2010     2009  
 
Underwriting expenses
  $ 324,599     $ 308,970  
Service expenses
    18,411       20,503  
Net foreign currency losses
    1,316       5,427  
Other costs and expenses
    26,497       30,614  
 
Total
  $ 370,823     $ 365,514  
 
          Underwriting expenses are comprised of commissions paid to agents and brokers, premium taxes and other assessments and internal underwriting costs. The expense ratio (underwriting expenses expressed as a percentage of premiums earned) increased to 34.2% in 2010 from 32.5% in 2009 primarily due to the decline in earned premiums, higher commission rates for certain reinsurance contracts and higher expenses related to recently started business operations. Recently started business operations have a relatively higher expense ratio due to their early stage of development, particularly in our international segment.
          Service expenses, which represent the costs associated with the fee-based businesses, decreased 10% to $18 million due to lower employment costs and lower direct cost associated with the lower assigned risk business revenues.
          Net foreign currency losses result from transactions denominated in a currency other than the operating unit’s functional currency. The loss in 2010 was primarily attributable to foreign operating units holding assets denominated in U.S. dollars.
          Other costs and expenses, which represent corporate expenses, decreased 13% to $26 million due to a decrease in general and administrative costs, including employment costs.
          Expenses from Wholly-Owned Investees. Expenses from wholly-owned investees were $50 million in 2010 compared to $47 million in 2009. These expenses represent costs associated with aviation-related businesses that were separately purchased in 2007, 2008 and 2009. These include cost of goods sold related to aircraft and other sales, labor and equipment costs related to repairs and other services and general and administrative expenses. The 2010 and 2009 expenses are not comparable since the Company acquired one of its aviation companies in June 2009.
          Interest Expense. Interest expense increased 29% to $26 million due to the issuance of $300 million of 7.375% senior notes in September 2009.

37


 

          Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate was an expense of 24% in 2010 as compared to 22% in 2009. The effective income tax rate differs from the federal income tax rate of 35% primarily because of tax-exempt investment income. The tax exempt investment income was a greater portion of the 2009 pre-tax income and as such had a larger impact to the effective tax rate for 2009.
Investments
          As part of its investment strategy, the Company establishes a level of cash and highly liquid short-term and intermediate-term securities that, combined with expected cash flow, it believes are adequate to meet its payment obligations. The Company also attempts to maintain an appropriate relationship between the average duration of the investment portfolio and the approximate duration of its liabilities, i.e., policy claims and debt obligations. The average duration of its portfolio remained at 3.6 years at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The Company’s investment portfolio and investment-related assets as of June 30, 2010 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
                 
    Cost     Carrying Value  
Fixed maturity securities:
               
U.S. government and government agencies
  $ 1,519,879     $ 1,586,226  
State and municipal
    5,451,318       5,694,685  
Mortgage-backed securities:
               
Agency
    1,027,851       1,078,235  
Residential-Prime
    282,954       277,443  
Residential-Alt A
    68,218       65,819  
Commercial
    44,876       37,327  
 
Total mortgage-backed securities
    1,423,899       1,458,824  
 
Corporate:
               
Industrial
    820,182       886,960  
Financial
    544,061       552,700  
Utilities
    183,998       195,928  
Asset-backed
    226,186       209,633  
Other
    125,109       125,896  
 
Total corporate
    1,899,536       1,971,117  
 
 
               
Foreign government and foreign government agencies
    423,381       436,900  
 
Total fixed maturity securities
    10,718,013       11,147,752  
 
 
               
Equity securities available for sale:
               
Preferred stocks:
               
Financial
    110,102       93,994  
Real estate
    69,743       69,822  
Utilities
    52,894       51,936  
 
Total preferred stocks
    232,739       215,752  
 
 
               
Common stocks
    48,120       141,477  
 
Total equity securities available for sale
    280,859       357,229  
 
 
               
Arbitrage trading account
    498,368       498,368  
Investment in arbitrage funds
    58,564       58,564  
Investment funds
    422,255       421,394  
Loans receivable
    373,605       373,605  
 
Total investments
  $ 12,351,664     $ 12,856,912  
 
          Fixed Maturity Securities. The Company’s investment policy with respect to fixed maturity securities is generally to purchase instruments with the expectation of holding them to their maturity. However, management of the available for sale portfolio is considered necessary to maintain an approximate matching of assets and liabilities as well as to adjust the portfolio as a result of changes in financial market conditions and tax considerations. At June 30, 2010 (as compared to December 31, 2009), the fixed maturity securities portfolio mix was as follows: state and municipal securities were 51% (52% in 2009); corporate securities were 18% (15% in 2009); U.S. government securities were 14% (15% in 2009); mortgage-backed securities were 13% (14% in 2009); and foreign government bonds were 4% (4% in 2009).

38


 

          The Company’s philosophy related to holding or selling fixed maturity securities is based on its objective of maximizing total return. The key factors that management considers in its investment decisions as to whether to hold or sell fixed maturity securities are its view of the underlying fundamentals of specific securities as well as its expectations regarding interest rates, credit spreads and currency values. In a period in which management expects interest rates to rise, the Company may sell longer duration securities in order to mitigate the impact of an interest rate rise on the fair value of the portfolio. Similarly, in a period in which management expects credit spreads to widen, the Company may sell lower quality securities, and in a period in which management expects certain foreign currencies to decline in value, the Company may sell securities denominated in those foreign currencies. The sale of fixed maturity securities in order to achieve the objective of maximizing total return may result in realized gains; however, there is no reason to expect these gains to continue in future periods.
          Equity Securities Available for Sale. Equity securities available for sale primarily represent investments in common and preferred stocks of publicly traded REITs, financial companies and utilities.
          Arbitrage Trading Account. The arbitrage trading account is comprised of direct investments in arbitrage securities. Merger arbitrage is the business of investing in the securities of publicly held companies that are the targets in announced tender offers and mergers.
          Investment in Arbitrage Funds. Investment in arbitrage funds represents investments in limited partnerships that specialize in merger arbitrage, convertible arbitrage and relative value arbitrage. Convertible arbitrage is the business of investing in convertible securities with the goal of capitalizing on price differentials between these securities and their underlying equities. Relative value arbitrage is the business of investing primarily in equity securities with the goal of capitalizing on perceived differences in fundamental values between pairs of companies in similar industries.
          Investment Funds. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company’s carrying value in investment funds was $421 million and $419 million, respectively, including investments in real estate funds of $199 million and $193 million, respectively, and investments in energy funds of $97 million and $106 million, respectively.
          Loans Receivable. Loans receivable, which are carried at amortized cost, have an aggregate cost of $374 million and an aggregate fair value of $313 million at June 30, 2010. Amortized cost of these loans is net of a valuation allowance of $16.4 million as of June 30, 2010. The ten largest loans have an aggregate amortized cost of $296 million and an aggregate fair value of $230 million and are secured by commercial real estate. These loans earn interest at floating LIBOR-based interest rates and have maturities (inclusive of extension options) between August 2011 and January 2013. The loans are secured by office buildings (60%), hotels (27%) and senior living facilities (13%) located primarily in New York City, California, Hawaii, Boston and Philadelphia.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
          Cash Flow. Cash flow provided from operating activities was $187 million in 2010 compared to cash flow used in operating activities of $9 million in 2009. The increase in cash flow from operating activities in 2010 was primarily due to cash transfers to the arbitrage trading accounts of $290 million in 2009. Cash transfers to the arbitrage trading account are included in cash flow from operations under U. S. generally accepted accounting principles.
          The Company’s insurance subsidiaries’ principal sources of cash are premiums, investment income, service fees and proceeds from sales and maturities of portfolio investments. The principal uses of cash are payments for claims, taxes, operating expenses and dividends. The Company expects its insurance subsidiaries to fund the payment of losses with cash received from premiums, investment income and fees. The Company targets an average duration for its investment portfolio that is within one year of the average duration of its liabilities so that portions of its investment portfolio mature throughout the claim cycle and are available for the payment of claims if necessary. In the event operating cash flow and proceeds from maturities and prepayments of fixed maturity securities are not sufficient to fund claim payments and other cash requirements, the remainder of the Company’s cash and investments is available to pay claims and other obligations as they become due. The Company’s investment portfolio is highly liquid, with approximately 87% invested in cash, cash equivalents and marketable fixed maturity securities as of June 30, 2010. If the sale of fixed maturity securities were to become necessary, a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the cost and sales price of securities sold would be recognized.
          Financing Activity. During the first six months of 2010, the Company repurchased 8,906,471 shares of its common stock for $231 million. In March 2010, the Company repaid $7.2 million of its junior subordinated debentures.
          At June 30, 2010, the Company had senior notes, junior subordinated debentures and other debt outstanding with a carrying value of $1,585 million and a face amount of $1,602 million. The maturities of the outstanding debt are $152 million

39


 

in 2010, $5 million in 2011, $16 million in 2012, $201 million in 2013, $200 million in 2015, $450 million in 2019, $77 million in 2022, $1 million in 2023, $250 million in 2037 and $250 million in 2045.
          At June 30, 2010, equity was $3.7 billion and total capitalization (equity, senior notes and other debt and junior subordinated debentures) was $5.3 billion. The percentage of the Company’s capital attributable to senior notes, junior subordinated debentures and other debt was 30% at June 30, 2010 and 31% at December 31, 2009.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
          The Company’s market risk generally represents the risk of loss that may result from the potential change in the fair value of the Company’s investment portfolio as a result of fluctuations in prices, interest rates and currency exchange rates. The Company attempts to manage its interest rate risk by maintaining an appropriate relationship between the average duration of its investment portfolio and the approximate duration of its liabilities, i.e., policy claims and debt obligations.
          The duration of the investment portfolio was 3.6 years at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The overall market risk relating to the Company’s portfolio has remained similar to the risk at December 31, 2009.

40


 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures
          Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company has in place effective controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act and the rules thereunder, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.
          Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
          The Company’s subsidiaries are subject to disputes, including litigation and arbitration, arising in the ordinary course of their insurance and reinsurance businesses. The Company’s estimates of the costs of settling such matters are reflected in its aggregate reserves for losses and loss expenses, and the Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of such matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
          There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
          Set forth below is a summary of the shares repurchased by the Company during the quarter and the number of shares remaining authorized for purchase by the Company.
                                 
                    Total number of shares purchased   Maximum number of
    Total number           as part of publicly announced   shares that may yet be
    of shares   Average price   plans   purchased under the
    purchased   paid per share   or programs   plans or programs (1)
April 2010
    391,842     $ 27.15       391,842       11,149,020  
May 2010
    3,153,705     $ 26.82       3,153,705       7,995,315  
June 2010
    1,514,804     $ 26.90       1,514,804       6,480,511  
 
(1)   Remaining shares available for repurchase under the Company’s repurchase authorization approved by the board of directors on February 8, 2010. The Company’s repurchase authorization was increased to 10,000,000 shares by its Board of Directors on August 3, 2010.

41


 

Item 6. Exhibits
     
Number    
 
   
(10.1)
  Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the W. R. Berkley Corporation 2003 Stock Incentive Plan.
 
   
(31.1)
  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a).
 
   
(31.2)
  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a).
 
   
(32.1)
  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

42


 

SIGNATURES
          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
             
 
      W. R. BERKLEY CORPORATION    
 
           
Date: August 6, 2010
      /s/ William R. Berkley
 
William R. Berkley
   
 
      Chairman of the Board and    
 
      Chief Executive Officer    
 
           
Date: August 6, 2010
      /s/ Eugene G. Ballard
 
Eugene G. Ballard
   
 
      Senior Vice President -
   
 
      Chief Financial Officer    

43