BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS Corp - Quarter Report: 2011 April (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended April 3, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-49850
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 95-4388794 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
2525 East El Segundo Boulevard El Segundo, California |
90245 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (310) 536-0611
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
|
o | Accelerated filer | þ | |||
Non-accelerated filer
|
o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
There were 21,984,070 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share outstanding as of
April 29, 2011.
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||||
Item 1 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
Item 2 | 17 | |||||||
Item 3 | 27 | |||||||
Item 4 | 27 | |||||||
Item 1 | 28 | |||||||
Item 1A | 31 | |||||||
Item 2 | 31 | |||||||
Item 3 | 32 | |||||||
Item 4 | 32 | |||||||
Item 5 | 32 | |||||||
Item 6 | 32 | |||||||
33 | ||||||||
EX-15.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 |
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
April 3, | January 2, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 6,500 | $ | 5,620 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $105 and $201, respectively |
11,903 | 15,000 | ||||||
Merchandise inventories, net |
255,525 | 254,217 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
7,400 | 7,588 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
8,958 | 9,447 | ||||||
Total current assets |
290,286 | 291,872 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
78,026 | 81,333 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
12,959 | 12,396 | ||||||
Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $151 and $69, respectively |
2,247 | 2,322 | ||||||
Goodwill |
4,433 | 4,433 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 387,951 | $ | 392,356 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 95,148 | $ | 94,818 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
55,342 | 64,392 | ||||||
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
1,697 | 1,925 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
152,187 | 161,135 | ||||||
Deferred rent, less current portion |
23,489 | 24,349 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations, less current portion |
1,374 | 1,569 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
51,808 | 48,313 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
6,883 | 6,264 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
235,741 | 241,630 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued 23,466,120 and
23,315,832 shares, respectively; outstanding 21,982,825 and 21,832,537 shares, respectively |
235 | 233 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
98,270 | 97,910 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
75,071 | 73,949 | ||||||
Less: Treasury stock, at cost; 1,483,295 shares |
(21,366 | ) | (21,366 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
152,210 | 150,726 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 387,951 | $ | 392,356 | ||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
-3-
Table of Contents
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
13 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
April 3, | April 4, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net sales |
$ | 221,143 | $ | 218,521 | ||||
Cost of sales |
148,960 | 146,971 | ||||||
Gross profit |
72,183 | 71,550 | ||||||
Selling and administrative expense |
67,262 | 63,063 | ||||||
Operating income |
4,921 | 8,487 | ||||||
Interest expense |
605 | 404 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
4,316 | 8,083 | ||||||
Income taxes |
1,556 | 3,050 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,760 | $ | 5,033 | ||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.23 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.23 | ||||
Dividends per share |
$ | 0.075 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
21,619 | 21,484 | ||||||
Diluted |
21,946 | 21,843 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
-4-
Table of Contents
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
13 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
April 3, | April 4, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,760 | $ | 5,033 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,656 | 4,547 | ||||||
Share-based compensation |
434 | 463 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit related to share-based awards |
(68 | ) | (136 | ) | ||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
82 | 13 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(74 | ) | (788 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
3,097 | 5,656 | ||||||
Merchandise inventories, net |
(1,308 | ) | (9,189 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
181 | 556 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
2,631 | 16,627 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities |
(8,214 | ) | (6,462 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
4,177 | 16,320 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(2,467 | ) | (1,973 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,467 | ) | (1,973 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Principal borrowings under current revolving credit facility |
43,101 | | ||||||
Principal payments under current revolving credit facility |
(39,606 | ) | | |||||
Net principal payments under previous revolving credit facility |
| (9,451 | ) | |||||
Changes in book overdraft |
(2,133 | ) | (3,908 | ) | ||||
Principal payments under capital lease obligations |
(531 | ) | (497 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of share option awards |
201 | 151 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit related to share-based awards |
68 | 136 | ||||||
Tax withholding payments for share-based compensation |
(283 | ) | (143 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(1,647 | ) | (1,087 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(830 | ) | (14,799 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
880 | (452 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
5,620 | 5,765 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 6,500 | $ | 5,313 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Property and equipment acquired under capital leases |
$ | 108 | $ | 234 | ||||
Property and equipment purchases accrued |
$ | 244 | $ | 1,004 | ||||
Share-based awards vested and issued to employees |
$ | 757 | $ | 375 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 595 | $ | 393 | ||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 1,521 | $ | 93 | ||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
-5-
Table of Contents
(1) | Description of Business |
Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (the Company) is a leading sporting
goods retailer in the western United States, operating 396 stores in 12 states at April 3, 2011.
The Company provides a full-line product offering in a traditional sporting goods store format that
averages approximately 11,000 square feet. The Companys product mix includes athletic shoes,
apparel and accessories, as well as a broad selection of outdoor and athletic equipment for team
sports, fitness, camping, hunting, fishing, tennis, golf, snowboarding and roller sports. The
Company is a holding company that operates as one business segment through Big 5 Corp., its
wholly-owned subsidiary, and Big 5 Services Corp., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Big 5
Corp. Big 5 Services Corp. provides a centralized operation for the issuance and administration of
gift cards.
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (Interim
Financial Statements) of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP)
for interim financial information and are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form
10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, these Interim Financial Statements do not
include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These
Interim Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2011 included in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, the Interim Financial Statements
included herein contain all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, considered
necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position, the results of operations and cash
flows for the periods presented.
The operating results and cash flows of the interim periods presented herein are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or the full year.
(2) | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Consolidation
The accompanying Interim Financial Statements include the accounts of Big 5 Sporting Goods
Corporation, Big 5 Corp. and Big 5 Services Corp. Intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Reporting Period
The Company follows the concept of a 52-53 week fiscal year, which ends on the Sunday nearest
December 31. Fiscal year 2011 is comprised of 52 weeks and ends on January 1, 2012. Fiscal year
2010 was comprised of 52 weeks and ended on January 2, 2011. The fiscal interim periods in fiscal
2011 and 2010 are each comprised of 13 weeks.
-6-
Table of Contents
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
Recently Issued Accounting Updates
There have been no recently issued accounting updates that are expected to have a material
impact on the Companys Interim Financial Statements.
Use of Estimates
Management has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets,
liabilities and stockholders equity and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the Interim Financial Statements and reported amounts of revenue and expense during the
reporting period to prepare these Interim Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP. Certain
items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the carrying amount of merchandise
inventories, property and equipment, and goodwill; valuation allowances for receivables, sales
returns and deferred income tax assets; estimates related to gift card breakage and the valuation
of share-based compensation awards; and obligations related to asset retirements, litigation,
self-insurance liabilities and employee benefits. Actual results could differ significantly from
these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
Revenue Recognition
The Company earns revenue by selling merchandise primarily through its retail stores. Revenue
is recognized when merchandise is purchased by and delivered to the customer and is shown net of
estimated returns during the relevant period. The allowance for sales returns is estimated based
upon historical experience.
Cash received from the sale of gift cards is recorded as a liability, and revenue is
recognized upon the redemption of the gift card or when it is determined that the likelihood of
redemption is remote (gift card breakage) and no liability to relevant jurisdictions exists. The
Company determines the gift card breakage rate based upon historical redemption patterns and
recognizes gift card breakage on a straight-line basis over the estimated gift card redemption
period (20 quarters as of the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2011). The Company recognized
approximately $105,000 and $109,000 in gift card breakage revenue for the 13 weeks ended April 3,
2011 and the 13 weeks ended April 4, 2010, respectively.
The Company records sales tax collected from its customers on a net basis, and therefore
excludes it from revenue as defined in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 605, Revenue
Recognition.
Included in revenue are sales of returned merchandise to vendors specializing in the resale of
defective or used products, which accounted for less than 1% of net sales in each of the periods
reported.
Valuation of Merchandise Inventories, Net
The Companys merchandise inventories are made up of finished goods and are valued at the
lower of cost or market using the weighted-average cost method that approximates the first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. Average cost includes the direct purchase price of merchandise
-7-
Table of Contents
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
inventory, net of vendor allowances and cash discounts, and allocated overhead costs associated
with the Companys distribution center.
Management regularly reviews inventories and records valuation reserves for merchandise damage
and defective returns, merchandise items with slow-moving or obsolescence exposure and merchandise
that has a carrying value that exceeds market value. Because of its merchandise mix, the Company
has not historically experienced significant occurrences of obsolescence.
Inventory shrinkage is accrued as a percentage of merchandise sales based on historical
inventory shrinkage trends. The Company performs physical inventories of its stores at least once
per year and cycle counts inventories at its distribution center throughout the year. The reserve
for inventory shrinkage represents an estimate for inventory shrinkage for each store since the
last physical inventory date through the reporting date.
These reserves are estimates, which could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably,
from actual results if future economic conditions, consumer demand and competitive environments
differ from expectations.
Leases and Deferred Rent
The Company accounts for its leases under the provisions of ASC 840, Leases.
The Company evaluates and classifies its leases as either operating or capital leases for
financial reporting purposes. Operating lease commitments consist principally of leases for the
Companys retail store facilities, distribution center and corporate office. Capital lease
obligations consist principally of leases for some of the Companys distribution center delivery
tractors, management information systems hardware and point-of-sale equipment for the Companys
stores.
Certain of the leases for the Companys retail store facilities provide for payments based on
future sales volumes at the leased location, which are not measurable at the inception of the
lease. These contingent rents are expensed as they accrue.
Deferred rent represents the difference between rent paid and the amounts expensed for
operating leases. Certain leases have scheduled rent increases, and certain leases include an
initial period of free or reduced rent as an inducement to enter into the lease agreement (rent
holidays). The Company recognizes rent expense for rent increases and rent holidays on a
straight-line basis over the term of the underlying leases, without regard to when rent payments
are made. The calculation of straight-line rent is based on the reasonably assured lease term as
defined in ASC 840 and may exceed the initial non-cancelable lease term.
Landlord allowances for tenant improvements, or lease incentives, are recorded as deferred
rent and amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term as a component of rent expense.
-8-
Table of Contents
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
(3) | Fair Value Measurements |
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and
accrued expenses approximate the fair values of these instruments due to their short-term nature.
The carrying amount for borrowings under the revolving credit facility approximates fair value
because of the variable market interest rate charged to the Company for these borrowings.
(4) | Accrued Expenses |
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
April 3, | January 2, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Payroll and related expense |
$ | 17,585 | $ | 18,920 | ||||
Occupancy costs |
8,282 | 8,573 | ||||||
Sales tax |
8,146 | 10,359 | ||||||
Advertising |
4,323 | 6,603 | ||||||
Other |
17,006 | 19,937 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
$ | 55,342 | $ | 64,392 | ||||
(5) | Long-Term Debt |
On October 18, 2010, the Company terminated its prior financing agreement with The CIT
Group/Business Credit, Inc. (CIT) and a syndicate of other lenders, as amended (the Prior
Financing Agreement) and replaced it with a new credit agreement (the New Credit Agreement)
with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Wells Fargo), as administrative agent, and a
syndicate of other lenders. Initial borrowings under the New Credit Agreement on October 18, 2010
were used to, among other things, repay all of the Companys outstanding indebtedness under the
Prior Financing Agreement with CIT, at which time the Prior Financing Agreement was terminated.
The New Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility (the Credit Facility)
with an aggregate committed availability of up to $140.0 million, which amount may be increased at
the Companys option up to a maximum of $165.0 million. The Company may also request additional
increases in aggregate availability, up to a maximum of $200.0 million, in which case the existing
lenders under the New Credit Agreement will have the option to increase their commitments to
accommodate the requested increase. If such existing lenders do not exercise that option, the
Company may (with the consent of Wells Fargo, not to be unreasonably withheld) seek other lenders
willing to provide such commitments. The Credit Facility includes a $50.0 million sublimit for
issuances of letters of credit and a $20.0 million sublimit for swingline loans. All amounts
outstanding under the Credit Facility will mature and become due on October 18, 2014.
-9-
Table of Contents
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
The Company had long-term revolving credit borrowings of $51.8 million at April 3, 2011 and
$48.3 million at January 2, 2011. Total remaining borrowing availability, after subtracting letters
of credit, was $87.4 million and $90.9 million as of April 3, 2011 and January 2, 2011,
respectively.
Obligations under the New Credit Agreement are secured by a general lien and perfected
security interest in substantially all of the Companys assets. The New Credit Agreement contains
covenants that require the Company to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than
1.0:1.0 in certain circumstances, and limit the Companys ability to, among other things, incur
liens, incur additional indebtedness, transfer or dispose of assets, change the nature of the
business, guarantee obligations, pay dividends or make other distributions or repurchase stock, and
make advances, loans or investments.
Based on terms of the New Credit Agreement as of October 2010, the Company has presented its
cash flows related to borrowing and repayment activities under the revolving credit facility on a
gross basis for the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2011.
(6) | Income Taxes |
Under the asset and liability method prescribed under ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company
recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected
to be realized or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and
liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The
realizability of deferred tax assets is assessed throughout the year and a valuation allowance is
recorded if necessary to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount more likely than not to be
realized.
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and files tax returns in various
state and local jurisdictions. The statutes of limitations for consolidated federal income tax
returns are open for fiscal years 2007 and after, and state and local income tax returns are open
for fiscal years 2006 and after.
At April 3, 2011 and January 2, 2011, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits that, if
recognized, would affect the Companys effective income tax rate over the next 12 months. The
Companys policy is to recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest
expense and penalties in operating expense. At April 3, 2011 and January 2, 2011, the Company had
no accrued interest or penalties.
(7) | Share-based Compensation |
At its discretion, the Company grants share option awards or nonvested share awards to certain
employees, as defined by ASC 718, CompensationStock Compensation, under the Companys 2007 Equity
and Performance Incentive Plan (the Plan) and accounts for its share-
-10-
Table of Contents
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
based compensation in
accordance with ASC 718. The Company recognized approximately $0.4 million and $0.5 million in
share-based compensation expense, including share option awards and nonvested share awards, for the
13 weeks ended April 3, 2011 and April 4, 2010, respectively.
Share Option Awards
Share option awards granted by the Company generally vest and become exercisable at the rate
of 25% per year with a maximum life of ten years. The exercise price of the share option awards is
equal to the quoted market price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. In the 13
weeks ended April 3, 2011 and April 4, 2010, the Company granted no share option awards.
As of April 3, 2011, there was $0.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
nonvested share option awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 1.7 years.
Nonvested Share Awards
In the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2011, the Company granted 149,100 nonvested share awards. The
weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of the Companys nonvested share awards granted in
the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2011 was $11.91.
The following table details the Companys nonvested share awards activity for the 13 weeks
ended April 3, 2011:
Weighted- | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant-Date | ||||||||
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Balance at January 2, 2011 |
233,750 | $ | 13.69 | |||||
Granted |
149,100 | 11.91 | ||||||
Vested |
(63,525 | ) | 12.79 | |||||
Forfeited |
(500 | ) | 13.43 | |||||
Balance at April 3, 2011 |
318,825 | $ | 13.04 | |||||
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of nonvested share awards is the quoted market
price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant, as shown in the table above.
Nonvested share awards granted by the Company generally vest from the date of grant in four
equal annual installments of 25% per year.
As of April 3, 2011, there was $3.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
nonvested share awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
3.2 years.
To satisfy employee minimum statutory tax withholding requirements for nonvested share
awards that vest, the Company withholds and retires a portion of the vesting common shares,
-11-
Table of Contents
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
unless
an employee elects to pay cash. In the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2011, the Company withheld 23,754
common shares with a total value of $0.3 million. This amount is presented as a cash outflow from
financing activities in the accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated statements of
cash flows.
(8) | Earnings Per Share |
The Company calculates earnings per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share,
which requires a dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per
share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average shares of common stock
outstanding, reduced by shares repurchased and held in treasury, during the period. Diluted
earnings per share represents basic earnings per share adjusted to include the potentially dilutive
effect of outstanding share option awards and nonvested share awards.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share:
13 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
April 3, | April 4, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,760 | $ | 5,033 | ||||
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
21,619 | 21,484 | ||||||
Dilutive effect of common stock
equivalents arising from share option
and nonvested share awards |
327 | 359 | ||||||
Diluted |
21,946 | 21,843 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.23 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.23 | ||||
The computation of diluted earnings per share for the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2011 and the 13
weeks ended April 4, 2010 does not include share option awards in the amounts of 890,770 and
891,065, respectively, that were outstanding and antidilutive (i.e., including such share option
awards would result in higher earnings per share), since the exercise prices of these share option
awards exceeded the average market price of the Companys common shares. Additionally, the
computation of diluted earnings per share for the 13 weeks ended April 4, 2010 does not include
nonvested share awards in the amounts of 38,681 shares that were outstanding and antidilutive.
No nonvested share awards were antidilutive for the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2011.
-12-
Table of Contents
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
(9) | Commitments and Contingencies |
On August 6, 2009, the Company was served with a complaint filed in the California Superior
Court for the County of San Diego, entitled Shane Weyl v. Big 5 Corp., et al., Case No.
37-2009-00093109-CU-OE-CTL, alleging violations of the California Labor Code and the California
Business and Professions Code. The complaint was brought as a purported class action on behalf of
the Companys hourly employees in California for the four years prior to the filing of the
complaint. The plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the Company failed to provide hourly
employees with meal and rest periods and failed to pay wages within required time periods during
employment and upon termination of employment. The plaintiff seeks, on behalf of the class members,
an award of one hour of pay (wages) for each workday that a meal or rest period was not provided;
restitution of unpaid wages; actual, consequential and incidental losses and damages; pre-judgment
interest; statutory penalties including an additional thirty days wages for each hourly employee
in California whose employment terminated in the four years preceding the filing of the complaint;
civil penalties; an award of attorneys fees and costs; and injunctive and declaratory relief. On
December 14, 2009, the parties engaged in mediation and agreed to settle the lawsuit. On February
4, 2010, the parties filed a joint settlement and a motion to preliminarily approve the settlement
with the court. On July 16, 2010, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. On
November 9, 2010, the plaintiff filed a motion for final approval of the settlement with the court.
On January 24, 2011, the court granted final approval of the settlement, reduced the award of
plaintiffs attorneys fees, and instructed plaintiffs counsel to prepare a written order on final
approval of the settlement. The plaintiff filed a renewed motion for an award of attorneys fees
and costs, and the court has not yet ruled on that motion. The Company previously
recorded an estimated liability of $1.4 million under the settlement, inclusive of payments to
class members, plaintiffs attorneys fees and expenses, an enhancement payment to the class
representative, claims administrator fees and payment to the California Labor and Workforce
Development Agency, which has been included within the Companys accrued liabilities for legal
matters as of April 3, 2011. The Company admitted no liability or wrongdoing with respect to the
claims set forth in the lawsuit. Once the court enters the written order granting final approval,
the settlement will constitute a full and complete settlement and release of all claims related to
the lawsuit.
On August 13, 2009, the Company was served with a complaint filed in the California Superior
Court for the County of San Diego, entitled Michael Kelly v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et
al., Case No. 37-2009-00095594-CU-MC-CTL, alleging violations of the California Business and
Professions Code and California Civil Code. The complaint was brought as a purported class action
on behalf of persons who purchased certain tennis, racquetball and squash rackets from the Company.
The plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the Company employed deceptive pricing, marketing
and advertising practices with respect to the sale of such rackets. The plaintiff seeks, on behalf
of the class members, unspecified amounts of damages and/or restitution; attorneys fees and costs;
and injunctive relief to require the Company to discontinue the allegedly improper conduct. On
July 20, 2010, the plaintiff filed with the court a Motion for Class Certification. The plaintiff
and the Company engaged in mediation on
September 1, 2010 and again on November 22, 2010. During mediation, the parties agreed to
settle
-13-
Table of Contents
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
the lawsuit. On January 27, 2011, the plaintiff filed a motion to preliminarily approve the
settlement with the court. Under the terms of the settlement, the Company agreed that class
members who submit valid and timely claim forms will receive a refund of the purchase price of a
class racket, up to $50 per racket, in the form of either a gift card or a check. Additionally,
the Company agreed to pay plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs, an enhancement payment to the
class representative and claims administrators fees. Under the proposed settlement, if the total
amount paid by the Company for the class payout, plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs, class
representative enhancement payment and claims administrators fees is less than $4.0 million, then
the Company will issue merchandise vouchers to a charity for the balance of the deficiency in the
manner provided in the settlement agreement. On March 21, 2011, the court granted preliminary
approval of the settlement. The court has scheduled a hearing for July 29, 2011 to consider
granting final approval of the settlement. The Companys estimated total cost pursuant to this
settlement is reflected in a legal settlement accrual recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2010. The Company admitted no liability or wrongdoing with respect to the claims set forth in the
lawsuit. Once final approval is granted, the settlement will constitute a full and complete
settlement and release of all claims related to the lawsuit. If the court does not grant
preliminary or final approval of the settlement, the Company intends to defend the lawsuit
vigorously. If the settlement is not finally approved by the court and the lawsuit is settled or
resolved unfavorably to the Company, this litigation, the costs of defending it and any resulting
required change in the business practices of the Company could have a material negative impact on
the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
The Company was served on the following dates with the following eight complaints, each of
which was brought as a purported class action on behalf of persons who made purchases at the
Companys stores in California using credit cards and were requested or required to provide
personal identification information at the time of the transaction: (1) on February 22, 2011, a
complaint filed in the California Superior Court in the County of Los Angeles, entitled Maria
Eugenia Saenz Valiente v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et al., Case No. BC455049, alleging
violations of the California Civil Code and Business and Professions Code; (2) on February 22,
2011, a complaint filed in the California Superior Court in the County of Los Angeles, entitled
Scott Mossler v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et al., Case No. BC455477, alleging violations
of the California Civil Code; (3) on February 28, 2011, a complaint filed in the California
Superior Court in the County of Los Angeles, entitled Yelena Matatova v. Big 5 Sporting Goods
Corporation, et al., Case No. BC455459, alleging violations of the California Civil Code; (4) on
March 8, 2011, a complaint filed in the California Superior Court in the County of Los Angeles,
entitled Neal T. Wiener v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et al., Case No. BC456300, alleging
violations of the California Civil Code; (5) on March 22, 2011, a complaint filed in the California
Superior Court in the County of San Francisco, entitled Donna Motta v. Big 5 Sporting Goods
Corporation, et al., Case No. CGC-11-509228, alleging violations of the California Civil Code,
negligence, invasion of privacy and unlawful intrusion; (6) on March 30, 2011, a complaint filed in
the California Superior Court in the County of Alameda, entitled Steve Holmes v. Big 5 Sporting
Goods Corporation, et al., Case No. RG11563123, alleging violations of the California Civil Code;
(7) on March 30, 2011, a complaint filed in the California Superior Court in the County of San
Francisco, entitled Robin Nelson v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et al., Case No.
CGC-11-
-14-
Table of Contents
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(continued)
508829, alleging violations of the California Civil Code, negligence, invasion of privacy
and unlawful intrusion; and (8) on April 8, 2011, a complaint filed in the California Superior
Court in the County of San Joaquin, entitled Pamela B. Smith v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation,
et al., Case No. 39-2011-00261014-CU-BT-STK, alleging violations of the California Civil Code. Each
plaintiff alleges, among other things, that customers making purchases with credit cards at the
Companys stores in California were improperly requested to provide their zip code at the time of
such purchases. Each plaintiff seeks, on behalf of the class members, some or all of the following:
statutory penalties; attorneys fees; costs; restitution of property; disgorgement of profits; and
injunctive relief. On March 18, 2011, the plaintiff in the Matatova case and the plaintiff in the
Nelson case jointly filed with the Judicial Council of California a Petition for Coordination. On
April 1, 2011, the Company filed with the California Superior Court in the County of Los Angeles a
Motion to Transfer and Consolidate Actions. The Company intends to defend each suit vigorously. The
Company is not able to estimate a range of potential loss in the event of an unfavorable outcome in
any of these cases at the present time. If any of these cases are resolved unfavorably to the
Company, such litigation, the costs of defending it and any resulting required change in the
business practices of the Company could have a material negative impact on the Companys results of
operations and financial condition.
The Company is involved in various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not
expected to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results of
operations or liquidity.
(10) | Subsequent Event |
In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Companys Board of Directors declared a quarterly
cash dividend of $0.075 per share of outstanding common stock, which will be paid on June 15, 2011
to stockholders of record as of June 1, 2011.
-15-
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation
Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation
El Segundo, California
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Big 5 Sporting Goods
Corporation and subsidiaries (the Corporation) as of April 3, 2011, and the related condensed
consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the 13 week periods ended April 3, 2011
and April 4, 2010. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporations
management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such
condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation
and subsidiaries as of January 2, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our
report dated March 2, 2011, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheet as of January 2, 2011 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, California
May 4, 2011
May 4, 2011
-16-
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis of the Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation (we, our,
us) financial condition and results of operations includes information with respect to our plans
and strategies for our business and should be read in conjunction with our interim unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes (Interim Financial Statements)
included herein and our consolidated financial statements and related notes, and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2011.
Overview
We are a leading sporting goods retailer in the western United States, operating 396 stores in
12 states under the name Big 5 Sporting Goods at April 3, 2011. We provide a full-line product
offering in a traditional sporting goods store format that averages approximately 11,000 square
feet. Our product mix includes athletic shoes, apparel and accessories, as well as a broad
selection of outdoor and athletic equipment for team sports, fitness, camping, hunting, fishing,
tennis, golf, snowboarding and roller sports.
Executive Summary
Our operating results for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and the first quarter of fiscal
2010 reflected unfavorable macroeconomic conditions in our markets resulting primarily from the
lingering effects of the economic recession and uncertainty in the financial sector. If measures
implemented by the federal and state governments or private sector spending fail to stimulate a
prolonged economic recovery, this economic weakness could continue, which may continue to impact
our operating results.
| Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 increased 1.2% to $221.1 million
compared to $218.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in net sales
was attributable to an increase in new store sales. Same store sales decreased 0.9% in the
13 weeks ended April 3, 2011 versus the comparable 13-week period in the prior year. Same
store sales for a period reflect net sales from stores that operated throughout the period
as well as the corresponding prior period; e.g., comparable quarterly reporting periods
for quarterly comparisons. Net sales, including same store sales, this year also reflect a
benefit over the prior year from the calendar shift of the Easter holiday, during which
our stores are closed, out of the first fiscal quarter and into the second fiscal quarter
this year. |
||
| Net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 decreased 45.2% to $2.8 million, or
$0.13 per diluted share, compared to $5.0 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, for the
first quarter of fiscal 2010. The decrease in net income primarily reflected higher
selling and administrative expense that was not offset by the increase in overall net
sales, primarily as a result of a lack of same store sales growth. |
-17-
Table of Contents
| Gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2011
decreased by 10 basis points to 32.6% compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010,
primarily as a result of higher store occupancy costs reflecting an increased store count. |
||
| Selling and administrative expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 increased 6.7%
to $67.3 million, or 30.4% of net sales, compared to $63.1 million, or 28.8% of net sales,
for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to higher
store-related expense, excluding occupancy, as a result of new store openings and
increased employee benefit costs. |
||
| Operating income for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 decreased 42.0% to $4.9 million,
or 2.2% of net sales, compared to $8.5 million, or 3.9% of net sales, for the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. The lower operating income primarily reflected higher selling and
administrative expense that was not offset by the increase in overall net sales, primarily
as a result of a lack of same store sales growth. |
Results of Operations
The results of the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire
fiscal year.
13
Weeks Ended April 3, 2011 Compared to 13 Weeks Ended April 4, 2010
The following table sets forth selected items from our interim unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of operations by dollar and as a percentage of our net sales for the
periods indicated:
13 Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||||
April 3, 2011 | April 4, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 221,143 | 100.0 | % | $ | 218,521 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of sales (1) |
148,960 | 67.4 | 146,971 | 67.3 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
72,183 | 32.6 | 71,550 | 32.7 | ||||||||||||
Selling and administrative expense (2) |
67,262 | 30.4 | 63,063 | 28.8 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
4,921 | 2.2 | 8,487 | 3.9 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
605 | 0.3 | 404 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
4,316 | 1.9 | 8,083 | 3.7 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes |
1,556 | 0.7 | 3,050 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,760 | 1.2 | % | $ | 5,033 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Cost of sales includes the cost of merchandise, net of discounts or allowances
earned, freight, inventory shrinkage, buying, distribution center costs and store occupancy
costs. Store occupancy costs include rent, amortization of leasehold improvements, common area
maintenance, property taxes and insurance. |
|
(2) | Selling and administrative expense includes store-related expense, other than store
occupancy costs, as well as advertising, depreciation and amortization and expense associated
with operating our corporate headquarters. |
-18-
Table of Contents
Net
Sales. Net sales increased by $2.6 million, or 1.2%, to $221.1 million in the 13
weeks ended April 3, 2011 from $218.5 million in the same period last year. The change in net sales
reflected the following:
| New store sales increased by $6.5 million in the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2011 from
the same period last year, reflecting the opening of 12 new stores, net of
relocations, since January 3, 2010. The increase in new store sales was partially
offset by a reduction in closed store sales of $2.1 million. |
||
| Same store sales decreased $1.9 million, or 0.9%, for the 13 weeks ended April 3,
2011, versus the comparable 13-week period in the prior year. Same store sales for a
period reflect net sales from stores that operated throughout the period as well as
the corresponding prior period; e.g., comparable quarterly reporting periods for
quarterly comparisons. |
||
| Customer traffic into our retail stores decreased for the 13 weeks ended April 3,
2011 versus the comparable 13-week period in the prior year. |
||
| Net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 also reflected a benefit over the
prior year from the calendar shift of the Easter holiday, during which our stores are
closed, out of the first fiscal quarter and into the second fiscal quarter this year. |
Store count at April 3, 2011 was 396 versus 386 at April 4, 2010. We opened two new stores,
both of which were relocations, and closed two stores related to 2010 relocations in the 13 weeks
ended April 3, 2011. We opened two new stores, net of relocations, in the 13 weeks ended April 4,
2010. Excluding stores closed as part of relocations that began last year, we currently expect to
open between 10 and 15 net new stores in fiscal 2011.
Gross
Profit. Gross profit increased by $0.6 million, or 0.9%, to $72.2 million, or 32.6% of
net sales, in the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2011 from $71.6 million, or 32.7% of net sales, in the 13
weeks ended April 4, 2010. The change in gross profit was primarily attributable to the following:
| Net sales increased $2.6 million year over year in the first quarter of fiscal
2011. |
||
| Merchandise margins, which exclude buying, occupancy and distribution costs,
increased 12 basis points versus the first quarter last year. |
||
| Store occupancy costs increased by $0.8 million, or 26 basis points, year over
year, primarily reflecting the expense for new stores. |
Selling
and Administrative Expense. Selling and administrative expense increased by $4.2
million to $67.3 million, or 30.4% of net sales, in the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2011 from $63.1
million, or 28.8% of net sales, in the same period last year. The increase in selling and
administrative expense compared to the prior year was largely attributable to an increase in
store-related expense, excluding occupancy, of $3.1 million due mainly to higher labor and
operating costs to support the increase in store count and increased employee benefit costs, as
well as an increase in advertising expense of $0.8 million to support sales.
-19-
Table of Contents
Interest
Expense. Interest expense increased by $0.2 million to $0.6 million in the 13 weeks
ended April 3, 2011 compared to the same period last year. This increase reflects an increase in
average interest rates of approximately 110 basis points, due largely to higher applicable margins
under our new credit agreement, to 2.8% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from 1.7% in the same
period last year, offset slightly by a reduction in average debt levels of approximately $0.6
million to $55.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from $56.3 million in the first
quarter last year.
Income
Taxes. The provision for income taxes was $1.6 million for the 13 weeks ended April 3,
2011 and $3.1 million for the 13 weeks ended April 4, 2010. Our effective tax rate was 36.1% for
the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared with 37.7% for the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Our
lower effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the same period last year
primarily reflects our lower pre-tax income for the current year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal liquidity requirements are for working capital, capital expenditures and cash
dividends. We fund our liquidity requirements primarily through cash on hand, cash flows from
operations and borrowings from our revolving credit facility. On October 18, 2010, we refinanced
our revolving credit facility. We believe our cash and cash equivalents on hand, future cash flows
from operations and borrowings from our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund our
cash requirements for at least the next 12 months. There is no assurance, however, that we will be
able to generate sufficient cash flows from operations or maintain our ability to borrow under our
revolving credit facility.
We ended the first quarter of fiscal 2011 with $6.5 million of cash and cash equivalents
compared with $5.3 million at the end of the same period in fiscal 2010. Our cash flows from
operating, investing and financing activities are summarized as follows:
13 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
April 3, | April 4, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): |
||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 4,177 | $ | 16,320 | ||||
Investing activities |
(2,467 | ) | (1,973 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
(830 | ) | (14,799 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 880 | $ | (452 | ) | |||
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities for the 13 weeks ended April
3, 2011 and April 4, 2010 was $4.2 million and $16.3 million, respectively. The decrease in cash
provided by operating activities for the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2011 compared to the same period
last year primarily reflects lower net income for the current year and a smaller increase in
accounts payable due to lower inventory purchases and the timing of such purchases earlier in the
quarter, along with a smaller reduction in accounts receivable.
-20-
Table of Contents
Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the 13 weeks ended April 3,
2011 and April 4, 2010 was $2.5 million and $2.0 million, respectively. Capital expenditures,
excluding non-cash property and equipment acquisitions, represented substantially all of the net
cash used in investing activities for both periods.
Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities for the 13 weeks ended April 3,
2011 and April 4, 2010 was $0.8 million and $14.8 million. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011,
borrowings under our revolving credit facility increased, while cash was used to pay down
borrowings under our revolving credit facility in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. For both
periods, cash was also used to pay dividends.
As of April 3, 2011, we had revolving credit borrowings of $51.8 million and letter of credit
commitments of $0.8 million outstanding. These balances compare to revolving credit borrowings of
$48.3 million and letter of credit commitments of $0.8 million outstanding as of January 2, 2011
and revolving credit borrowings of $45.5 million and letter of credit commitments of $2.6 million
outstanding as of April 4, 2010.
The increase in revolving credit borrowings at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2011
compared to the same period last year primarily reflects higher inventory levels due to lower than
anticipated sales, combined with lower accounts payable as a result of reduced inventory purchases
for the current year along with the timing of payments. Cash balances were also $1.2 million higher
year over year, which were used to pay down debt subsequent to the end of the first quarter of
fiscal 2011.
Credit Agreement. On October 18, 2010, we terminated a financing agreement with The CIT
Group/Business Credit, Inc. (CIT) and a syndicate of other lenders, as amended (the Prior
Financing Agreement), and replaced it with a new credit agreement (the New Credit Agreement)
with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Wells Fargo), as administrative agent, and a
syndicate of other lenders. Initial borrowings under the New Credit Agreement on October 18, 2010
were used to, among other things, repay all of our outstanding indebtedness under the Prior
Financing Agreement with CIT, at which time the Prior Financing Agreement was terminated.
The New Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility (the Credit Facility) with
an aggregate committed availability of up to $140.0 million, which amount may be increased at our
option up to a maximum of $165.0 million. We may also request additional increases in aggregate
availability, up to a maximum of $200.0 million, in which case the existing lenders under the New
Credit Agreement will have the option to increase their commitments to accommodate the requested
increase. If such existing lenders do not exercise that option, we may (with the consent of Wells
Fargo, not to be unreasonably withheld) seek other lenders willing to provide such commitments.
The Credit Facility includes a $50.0 million sublimit for issuances of letters of credit and a
$20.0 million sublimit for swingline loans. All amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility will
mature and become due on October 18, 2014. As of April 3, 2011 and January 2, 2011, our total
remaining borrowing availability under the New Credit Agreement, after subtracting letters of
credit, was $87.4 million and $90.9 million, respectively.
-21-
Table of Contents
We may borrow under the Credit Facility from time to time, provided the amounts outstanding
will not exceed the lesser of the then aggregate availability (as described above) and the
Borrowing Base (such lesser amount being referred to as the Loan Cap). The Borrowing Base
generally is comprised of the sum, at the time of calculation of (a) 90.00% of our eligible credit
card accounts receivable; plus (b)(i) during the period of September 15 through December 15 of each
year, the cost of our eligible inventory, net of inventory reserves, multiplied by 90.00% of the
appraised net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory (expressed as a percentage of the
cost of eligible inventory); and (ii) at all other times, the cost of our eligible inventory, net
of inventory reserves, multiplied by 85.00% of the appraised net orderly liquidation value of
eligible inventory (expressed as a percentage of the cost of eligible inventory); plus (c) the
lesser of (i) the cost of our eligible in-transit inventory, net of inventory reserves, multiplied
by 85.00% of the appraised net orderly liquidation value of our eligible in-transit inventory
(expressed as a percentage of the cost of eligible in-transit inventory), or (ii) $10.0 million,
minus (d) certain reserves established by Wells Fargo in its role as the Administrative Agent in
its reasonable discretion.
Generally, we may designate specific borrowings under the Credit Facility as either base rate
loans or LIBO rate loans. In each case, the applicable interest rate will be a function of the
daily average, over the preceding fiscal quarter, of the excess of the Loan Cap over amounts
outstanding under the Credit Facility (such amount being referred to as the Average Daily Excess
Availability). Those loans designated as LIBO rate loans shall bear interest at a rate equal to
the then applicable LIBO rate plus an applicable margin as shown in the table below. Those loans
designated as base rate loans shall bear interest at a rate equal to the applicable margin for base
rate loans (as shown below) plus the highest of (a) the Federal funds rate, as in effect from time
to time, plus one-half of one percent (0.50%), (b) the LIBO rate, as adjusted to account for
statutory reserves, plus one percent (1.00%), or (c) the rate of interest in effect for such day as
publicly announced from time to time by Wells Fargo as its prime rate. The applicable margin for
all loans will be as set forth below as a function of Average Daily Excess Availability for the
preceding fiscal quarter:
LIBO Rate | Base Rate | |||||||||
Applicable | Applicable | |||||||||
Level | Average Daily Excess Availability | Margin | Margin | |||||||
I | Greater than 50% of the Loan Cap |
2.00% | 1.00% | |||||||
II | Less than or equal to 50% of the Loan Cap |
2.25% | 1.25% |
Obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by a general lien and perfected security
interest in substantially all of our assets. Our New Credit Agreement contains covenants that
require us to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.0:1.0 in certain
circumstances, and limit our ability to, among other things, incur liens, incur additional
indebtedness, transfer or dispose of assets, change the nature of the business, guarantee
obligations, pay dividends or make other distributions or repurchase stock, and make advances,
loans or investments. We may declare or pay cash dividends or repurchase stock only if, among other
things, no default or event of default then exists or would arise from such dividend or repurchase
of stock and, after giving effect to such dividend or repurchase, certain availability and fixed
charge coverage ratio requirements are satisfied. The New Credit Agreement contains customary
events of default, including, without
-22-
Table of Contents
limitation, failure to pay when due principal amounts with respect to the Credit Facility, failure
to pay any interest or other amounts under the Credit Facility for five days after becoming due,
failure to comply with certain agreements or covenants contained in the New Credit Agreement,
failure to satisfy certain judgments against us, failure to pay when due (or any other default
which does or may lead to the acceleration of) certain other material indebtedness in principal
amount in excess of $5.0 million, and certain insolvency and bankruptcy events.
Future Capital Requirements. We had cash on hand of $6.5 million at April 3, 2011. We expect
capital expenditures for the last three quarters of fiscal 2011, excluding non-cash property and
equipment acquisitions, to range from approximately $8.0 million
to $12.0 million, primarily to
fund the opening of new stores, store-related remodeling, distribution center equipment and
computer hardware and software purchases. We anticipate opening between 10 and 15 net new stores in
fiscal 2011.
Quarterly dividend payments of $0.05 per share of outstanding common stock, for an annual rate
of $0.20 per share, were paid in fiscal 2010. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, our Board of
Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.075 per share of outstanding common stock, for
an annual rate of $0.30 per share, which was paid on March 22, 2011 to stockholders of record as of
March 8, 2011. In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly
cash dividend of $0.075 per share of outstanding common stock, which will be paid on June 15, 2011
to stockholders of record as of June 1, 2011.
As of April 3, 2011, a total of $14.2 million remained available for share repurchases under
our share repurchase program. We consider several factors in determining when and if we make share
repurchases including, among other things, our alternative cash requirements, existing business
conditions and the market price of our stock. Due to the economic recession, we
discontinued share repurchases in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010.
We believe we will be able to fund our cash requirements, for at least the next twelve months,
from cash and cash equivalents on hand, operating cash flows and borrowings from our revolving
credit facility. However, our ability to satisfy our cash requirements depends upon our future
performance, which in turn is subject to general economic conditions and regional risks, and to
financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, including factors beyond our
control. There is no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow or that we
will be able to maintain our ability to borrow under our revolving credit facility.
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our obligations and
commitments, or if we are unable to maintain our ability to borrow sufficient amounts under our New
Credit Agreement, we will be required to refinance or restructure our indebtedness or raise
additional debt or equity capital. Additionally, we may be required to sell material assets or
operations, suspend or further reduce dividend payments or delay or forego expansion opportunities.
We might not be able to implement successful alternative strategies on satisfactory terms, if at
all.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations. Our material off-balance sheet
arrangements are operating lease obligations and letters of credit. We excluded
-23-
Table of Contents
these items from the balance sheet in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (GAAP).
Operating lease commitments consist principally of leases for our retail store facilities,
distribution center and corporate office. These leases frequently include options which permit us
to extend the terms beyond the initial fixed lease term. With respect to most of those leases, we
intend to renegotiate those leases as they expire.
Issued and outstanding letters of credit were $0.8 million at April 3, 2011, and were related
primarily to importing merchandise and funding insurance program liabilities.
Our material contractual obligations include capital lease obligations, borrowings under our
Credit Facility, certain occupancy costs related to our leased properties and other liabilities.
Capital lease obligations consist principally of leases for some of our distribution center
delivery tractors, management information systems hardware and point-of-sale equipment for our
stores. Our Credit Facility debt fluctuates daily depending on operating, investing and financing
cash flows. Occupancy costs include estimated property maintenance fees and property taxes for our
stores, distribution center and corporate headquarters. Other liabilities consist principally of
actuarially-determined reserve estimates related to self-insurance liabilities, a contractual
obligation for the surviving spouse of Robert W. Miller, our co-founder, and asset retirement
obligations related to the removal of leasehold improvements for certain stores upon termination of
their leases.
Included
in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of
Part II, Item 7, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2011, is a discussion of our future obligations and
commitments as of January 2, 2011. In the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2011, our revolving credit
borrowings increased by $3.5 million from the end of fiscal 2010. We entered into new operating
lease agreements in relation to our business operations during the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2011. We
do not believe that these operating leases or the increase in our revolving credit borrowings would
materially change our contractual obligations or commitments presented as of January 2, 2011.
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into arrangements with vendors to purchase
merchandise in advance of expected delivery. Because most of these purchase orders do not contain
any termination payments or other penalties if cancelled, they are not included as outstanding
contractual obligations.
Critical Accounting Estimates
As discussed in Part II, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2,
2011, we consider our estimates on inventory valuation, impairment of long-lived assets and
self-insurance reserves to be the most critical in understanding the judgments that are involved in
preparing our consolidated financial statements. There have been no significant changes to these
estimates in the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2011.
-24-
Table of Contents
Seasonality and Impact of Inflation
We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and operating results and typically
generate higher net sales in the fourth fiscal quarter, which includes the holiday selling season.
Accordingly, in the fourth fiscal quarter we experience normally higher purchase volumes and
increased expense for staffing and advertising. Seasonality influences our buying patterns which
directly impacts our merchandise and accounts payable levels and cash flows. We purchase
merchandise for seasonal activities in advance of a season. If we miscalculate the demand for our
products generally or for our product mix during the fourth fiscal quarter, our net sales can
decline, resulting in excess inventory, which can harm our financial performance. A shortfall from
expected fourth fiscal quarter net sales can negatively impact our annual operating results.
Beginning in the second half of fiscal 2010 and continuing into fiscal 2011, we are
experiencing increasing inflation in the purchase cost, including transportation cost, of certain products received or expected to
be received in fiscal 2011. If we are unable to adjust our selling prices for purchase cost
increases then our merchandise margins will decline, which could adversely impact our operating
results.
Recently Issued Accounting Updates
See Note 2 to Interim Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements,
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
-25-
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements
This document includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements relate to, among other
things, our financial condition, our results of operations, our growth strategy and the business of
our company generally. In some cases, you can identify such statements by terminology such as
may, could, project, estimate, potential, continue, should, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes, intends or other such terminology. These forward-looking statements
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results
in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. These risks and uncertainties
include, among other things, continued or worsening weakness in the consumer spending environment
and the U.S. financial and credit markets, the competitive environment in the sporting goods
industry in general and in our specific market areas, inflation, product availability and growth
opportunities, seasonal fluctuations, weather conditions, changes in cost of goods, operating
expense fluctuations, litigation risks, disruption in product flow, changes in interest rates,
credit availability, higher costs associated with sources of credit resulting from uncertainty in
financial markets and economic conditions in general. Those and other risks and uncertainties are
more fully described in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in this report and in Part I, Item 1A, Risk
Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and other filings with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission. We caution that the risk factors set forth in this report are not exclusive.
In addition, we conduct our business in a highly competitive and rapidly changing environment.
Accordingly, new risk factors may arise. It is not possible for management to predict all such risk
factors, nor to assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which
any individual risk factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from
those contained in any forward-looking statement. We undertake no obligation to revise or update
any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by us or on our behalf.
-26-
Table of Contents
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We are subject to risks resulting from interest rate fluctuations since interest on our
borrowings under our Credit Facility is based on variable rates. We enter into borrowings under our
Credit Facility principally for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate
purposes. We routinely evaluate the best use of our cash and cash equivalents on hand and manage
financial statement exposure to interest rate fluctuations by managing our level of indebtedness
and the interest base rate options on such indebtedness. We do not utilize derivative instruments
and do not engage in foreign currency transactions or hedging activities to manage our interest
rate risk. If the interest rate on our debt was to change 1.0% as compared to the rate at April 3,
2011, our interest expense would change approximately $0.5 million on an annual basis based on the
outstanding balance of our borrowings under our Credit Facility at April 3, 2011.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded
that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective, at a
reasonable assurance level, in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis,
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act and are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2011, no changes occurred with respect to our
internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
-27-
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
On August 6, 2009, the Company was served with a complaint filed in the California Superior
Court for the County of San Diego, entitled Shane Weyl v. Big 5 Corp., et al., Case No.
37-2009-00093109-CU-OE-CTL, alleging violations of the California Labor Code and the California
Business and Professions Code. The complaint was brought as a purported class action on behalf of
the Companys hourly employees in California for the four years prior to the filing of the
complaint. The plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the Company failed to provide hourly
employees with meal and rest periods and failed to pay wages within required time periods during
employment and upon termination of employment. The plaintiff seeks, on behalf of the class members,
an award of one hour of pay (wages) for each workday that a meal or rest period was not provided;
restitution of unpaid wages; actual, consequential and incidental losses and damages; pre-judgment
interest; statutory penalties including an additional thirty days wages for each hourly employee
in California whose employment terminated in the four years preceding the filing of the complaint;
civil penalties; an award of attorneys fees and costs; and injunctive and declaratory relief. On
December 14, 2009, the parties engaged in mediation and agreed to settle the lawsuit. On February
4, 2010, the parties filed a joint settlement and a motion to preliminarily approve the settlement
with the court. On July 16, 2010, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. On
November 9, 2010, the plaintiff filed a motion for final approval of the settlement with the court.
On January 24, 2011, the court granted final approval of the settlement, reduced the award of
plaintiffs attorneys fees, and instructed plaintiffs counsel to prepare a written order on final
approval of the settlement. The plaintiff filed a renewed motion for an award of attorneys fees
and costs, and the court has not yet ruled on that motion. The Company previously recorded an
estimated liability of $1.4 million under the settlement, inclusive of payments to class members,
plaintiffs attorneys fees and expenses, an enhancement payment to the class representative,
claims administrator fees and payment to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency,
which has been included within the Companys accrued liabilities for legal matters as of April 3,
2011. The Company admitted no liability or wrongdoing with respect to the claims set forth in the
lawsuit. Once the court enters the written order granting final approval, the settlement will
constitute a full and complete settlement and release of all claims related to the lawsuit.
On August 13, 2009, the Company was served with a complaint filed in the California Superior
Court for the County of San Diego, entitled Michael Kelly v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et
al., Case No. 37-2009-00095594-CU-MC-CTL, alleging violations of the California Business and
Professions Code and California Civil Code. The complaint was brought as a purported class action
on behalf of persons who purchased certain tennis, racquetball and squash rackets from the Company.
The plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the Company employed deceptive pricing, marketing
and advertising practices with respect to the sale of such rackets. The plaintiff seeks, on behalf
of the class members, unspecified amounts of damages and/or restitution; attorneys fees and costs;
and injunctive relief to require the Company to discontinue the allegedly improper conduct. On
July 20, 2010, the plaintiff filed with the court a Motion for Class Certification. The plaintiff
and the Company engaged in mediation on September 1, 2010 and again on November 22, 2010.
-28-
Table of Contents
During mediation, the parties agreed to settle the lawsuit. On January 27, 2011, the plaintiff
filed a motion to preliminarily approve the settlement with the court. Under the terms of the
settlement, the Company agreed that class members who submit valid and timely claim forms will
receive a refund of the purchase price of a class racket, up to $50 per racket, in the form of
either a gift card or a check. Additionally, the Company agreed to pay plaintiffs attorneys fees
and costs, an enhancement payment to the class representative and claims administrators fees.
Under the proposed settlement, if the total amount paid by the Company for the class payout,
plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs, class representative enhancement payment and claims
administrators fees is less than $4.0 million, then the Company will issue merchandise vouchers to
a charity for the balance of the deficiency in the manner provided in the settlement agreement. On
March 21, 2011, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. The court has scheduled a
hearing for July 29, 2011 to consider granting final approval of the settlement. The Companys
estimated total cost pursuant to this settlement is reflected in a legal settlement accrual
recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company admitted no liability or wrongdoing with
respect to the claims set forth in the lawsuit. Once final approval is granted, the settlement will
constitute a full and complete settlement and release of all claims related to the lawsuit. If the
court does not grant preliminary or final approval of the settlement, the Company intends to defend
the lawsuit vigorously. If the settlement is not finally approved by the court and the lawsuit is
settled or resolved unfavorably to the Company, this litigation, the costs of defending it and any
resulting required change in the business practices of the Company could have a material negative
impact on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
The Company was served on the following dates with the following eight complaints, each of
which was brought as a purported class action on behalf of persons who made purchases at the
Companys stores in California using credit cards and were requested or required to provide
personal identification information at the time of the transaction: (1) on February 22, 2011, a
complaint filed in the California Superior Court in the County of Los Angeles, entitled Maria
Eugenia Saenz Valiente v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et al., Case No. BC455049, alleging
violations of the California Civil Code and Business and Professions Code; (2) on February 22,
2011, a complaint filed in the California Superior Court in the County of Los Angeles, entitled
Scott Mossler v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et al., Case No. BC455477, alleging violations
of the California Civil Code; (3) on February 28, 2011, a complaint filed in the California
Superior Court in the County of Los Angeles, entitled Yelena Matatova v. Big 5 Sporting Goods
Corporation, et al., Case No. BC455459, alleging violations of the California Civil Code; (4) on
March 8, 2011, a complaint filed in the California Superior Court in the County of Los Angeles,
entitled Neal T. Wiener v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et al., Case No. BC456300, alleging
violations of the California Civil Code; (5) on March 22, 2011, a complaint filed in the California
Superior Court in the County of San Francisco, entitled Donna Motta v. Big 5 Sporting Goods
Corporation, et al., Case No. CGC-11-509228, alleging violations of the California Civil Code,
negligence, invasion of privacy and unlawful intrusion; (6) on March 30, 2011, a complaint filed in
the California Superior Court in the County of Alameda, entitled Steve Holmes v. Big 5 Sporting
Goods Corporation, et al., Case No. RG11563123, alleging violations of the California Civil Code;
(7) on March 30, 2011, a complaint filed in the California Superior Court in the County of San
Francisco, entitled Robin Nelson v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et al., Case No.
CGC-11-508829, alleging violations of the California Civil Code, negligence, invasion of privacy
and unlawful intrusion; and (8) on
-29-
Table of Contents
April 8, 2011, a complaint filed in the California Superior Court in the County of San
Joaquin, entitled Pamela B. Smith v. Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, et al., Case No.
39-2011-00261014-CU-BT-STK, alleging violations of the California Civil Code. Each plaintiff
alleges, among other things, that customers making purchases with credit cards at the Companys
stores in California were improperly requested to provide their zip code at the time of such
purchases. Each plaintiff seeks, on behalf of the class members, some or all of the following:
statutory penalties; attorneys fees; costs; restitution of property; disgorgement of profits; and
injunctive relief. On March 18, 2011, the plaintiff in the Matatova case and the plaintiff in the
Nelson case jointly filed with the Judicial Council of California a Petition for Coordination. On
April 1, 2011, the Company filed with the California Superior Court in the County of Los Angeles a
Motion to Transfer and Consolidate Actions. The Company intends to defend each suit vigorously. The
Company is not able to estimate a range of potential loss in the event of an unfavorable outcome in
any of these cases at the present time. If any of these cases are resolved unfavorably to the
Company, such litigation, the costs of defending it and any resulting required change in the
business practices of the Company could have a material negative impact on the Companys results of
operations and financial condition.
The Company is involved in various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not
expected to have a material negative impact on the Companys financial position, results of
operations or liquidity.
-30-
Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors identified in Part I, Item 1A, Risk
Factors, of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2011.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
The Company made no stock repurchases under previously announced share repurchase plans during
the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2011. As discussed in Note 7 to the Interim Financial Statements
in this report, in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company withheld shares to satisfy minimum
statutory tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of certain nonvested share
awards issued to employees. This withholding of shares is shown in the tabular summary below:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES (1)
Total | Maximum | |||||||||||||||
Number of | Number (or | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Approximate | |||||||||||||||
Purchased | Dollar Value) | |||||||||||||||
as Part of | of Shares that | |||||||||||||||
Total | Publicly | May Yet Be | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Announced | Purchased | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Plans or | Under the Plans | |||||||||||||
Fiscal Period | Purchased | per Share | Programs | or Programs (4) | ||||||||||||
January 3 January 30 |
| | | $ | 14,207,000 | |||||||||||
January 31 February 27 |
| | | $ | 14,207,000 | |||||||||||
February 28 April 3 |
23,754 | (2) | $ | 11.91 | (3) | | $ | 14,207,000 | ||||||||
Total |
23,754 | $ | 11.91 | | $ | 14,207,000 | ||||||||||
(1) | The Companys dividends and stock repurchases are generally funded by
distributions from its subsidiary, Big 5 Corp. Generally, the Company may declare or pay cash
dividends or repurchase stock only if, among other things, no default or event of default then
exists under the Credit Facility or would arise from such dividend or repurchase of stock and,
after giving effect to such dividend or repurchase, the Company would have availability (i.e.,
the Loan Cap less aggregate unpaid credit extensions) under the Credit Facility of at least
$10 million, adjusted availability (i.e., the Borrowing Base less aggregate unpaid credit
extensions) under the Credit Facility of at least $30 million and a fixed charge coverage
ratio as defined in the New Credit Agreement of not less than 1.0:1.0. See Part I, Item 2,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources, for a further discussion of the Credit Facility. |
|
(2) | This amount reflects the number of shares of Company common stock withheld by the
Company to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding obligations in connection with the
vesting of certain nonvested share awards issued to employees. |
|
(3) | The price shown reflects the closing market value of the Companys common stock on
the date the shares were withheld, as discussed in footnote 2 to this table, which coincided
with the date of vesting of certain nonvested share awards issued to employees. |
|
(4) | This amount reflects the dollar value of shares remaining available to repurchase
under previously announced plans. There were no stock repurchases under previously announced
plans during the first quarter of fiscal 2011. |
-31-
Table of Contents
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
Item 4. | (Removed and Reserved) |
Item 5. | Other Information |
None.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit Number | Description of Document | |||
15.1 | Independent Auditors Awareness Letter Regarding Interim Financial Statements. |
|||
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|||
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|||
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|||
32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
-32-
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation |
||||
Date: May 4, 2011 | By: | /s/ Steven G. Miller | ||
Steven G. Miller |
||||
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer |
||||
Date: May 4, 2011 | By: | /s/ Barry D. Emerson | ||
Barry D. Emerson |
||||
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
||||
-33-