BioCorRx Inc. - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(X
)
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarter period ended September 30,
2009
|
( )
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE EXCHANGE
ACT
|
For
the transition period
from to
|
|
Commission
File
number 333-153381
|
CETRONE ENERGY
COMPANY
|
(Exact
name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
26-1972677
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
11010 East Boundary Road, Elk, Washington
99009
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
509.714.5236
|
(Issuer’s
telephone number)
|
N/A
|
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes [X] No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). The registrant has not been
phased into the Interactive Data reporting system. . Yes [ ] No
[ X ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting
company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and
“small reporting company” Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated [ ] Accelerated
filer [ ]
Non-accelerated
filer [ ]
(Do not
check if a small reporting company) Small reporting
company [X]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes
[X] No [ ]
1
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PROCEDING FIVE YEARS
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports
required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 after the distribution of securities subsequent to the distribution of
securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes □ No □
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date: November
20, 2009: 2,128,025 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per
share.
2
INDEX
Page
Number
|
||
PART
1.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM
1.
|
Financial
Statements (unaudited)
|
4
|
Balance
Sheet as at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
F-1
|
|
Statement
of Operations
For
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the period nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the period January 28,
2008 (Date of Inception) to September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008
|
F-2
|
|
Statement
of Shareholders’ Equity
|
F-3
|
|
Statement
of Cash Flows
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and for the period January 28,
2008 (Date of Inception) to September 30, 2009
|
F-4
|
|
Notes
to the Financial Statements.
|
F-5-12
|
|
ITEM
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
5
|
ITEM
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
9
|
ITEM
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
9
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
11
|
ITEM
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
11
|
ITEM
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
11
|
ITEM
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
11
|
ITEM
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
11
|
ITEM
5.
|
Other
Information
|
11
|
ITEM
6.
|
Exhibits
|
11
|
SIGNATURES.
|
12
|
|
3
PART
1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The
accompanying balance sheets of Cetrone Energy Company (a development
stage company) at September 30, 2009 (with comparative figures as at December
31, 2008) and the statement of operations for the three months ended September
30, 2009 and September 30 2008 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and September 30, 2008 and for the period from January 28, 2008 (date of
incorporation) to September 30, 2009, shareholders’ equity at September 30, 2009
and the statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008 and for the period from January 28, 2008 (date of
incorporation) to September 30, 2009 have been prepared by the
Company’s management in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of
operations and financial position have been included and all such adjustments
are of a normal recurring nature.
Operating
results for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative
of the results that can be expected for the year ending December 31,
2009.
4
CETRONE
ENERGY COMPANY
|
||||||||
(A
Development Stage Enterprise)
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEET
|
||||||||
September
30
|
December
31
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 305 | $ | 3,296 | ||||
Total
Current Assets
|
305 | 3,296 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 305 | $ | 3,296 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 8,900 | $ | 2,975 | ||||
Note
payable - related party
|
100 | 100 | ||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
9,000 | 3,075 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
- | - | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares
|
||||||||
authorized,
2,228,025 shares issued and outstanding
|
||||||||
respectively
|
2,128 | 2,228 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
3,114 | 4,014 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(13,937 | ) | (6,021 | ) | ||||
Total
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
|
(8,695 | ) | 221 | |||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
$ | 305 | $ | 3,296 |
F-1
CETRONE
ENERGY COMPANY
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(A
Development Stage Enterprise)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Period
from
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Three
Months
|
Three
Months
|
Nine
Months
|
Nine
Months
|
January
28,2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
(Inception)
to
|
||||||||||||||||
September
30
|
September
30
|
September
30
|
September
30
|
September
30
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
REVENUES
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Consulting
|
(1,000) | - | 524 | 2,000 | 2,524 | |||||||||||||||
Professional
fees
|
450 | 2,450 | 5,575 | 2,450 | 8,725 | |||||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
96 | 70 | 1,817 | 595 | 2,688 | |||||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
(454 | ) | 2,520 | 7,916 | 5,045 | 13,937 | ||||||||||||||
LOSS
FROM OPERATIONS
|
454 | (2,520 | ) | (7,916 | ) | (5,045 | ) | (13,937 | ) | |||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSES)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Other
income
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
TOTAL
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
|
- | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
LOSS
BEFORE TAXES
|
454 | (2,520 | ) | (7,916 | ) | (5,045 | ) | (13,937 | ) | |||||||||||
INCOME
TAX EXPENSE
|
- | - | ||||||||||||||||||
NET
LOSS
|
$ | 454 | $ | (2,520 | ) | $ | (7,916 | ) | $ | (5,045 | ) | $ | (13,937 | ) | ||||||
NET
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
BASIC
AND DILUTED
|
$ | 0 | $ | (0 | ) | $ | (0 | ) | $ | (0 | ) | |||||||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NUMBER
|
||||||||||||||||||||
OF
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
BASIC
AND DILUTED
|
2,228,025 | 2,200,000 | 2,228,025 | 1,711,111 |
F-2
CETRONE
ENERGY COMPANY
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(A
Development Stage Enterprise)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
STATEMENT
OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Equity
(Deficit)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued for cash
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
at $0.001 per share |
5/12/2008
|
2,000,000 | $ | 2,000 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,000 | ||||||||||||
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock for services
|
- | |||||||||||||||||||||
at $0.01 per share |
3/7/2008
|
200,000 | 200 | 1,800 | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||||
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued for cash
|
- | |||||||||||||||||||||
at $0.08 per share |
12/26/2008
|
28,025 | 28 | 2,214 | 2,242 | |||||||||||||||||
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss for period ended
|
- | |||||||||||||||||||||
December31,
2008
|
(6,021 | ) | (6,021 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
2,228,025 | $ | 2,228 | $ | 4,014 | $ | (6,021 | ) | $ | 221 | ||||||||||||
Cancellation
of stock issued for
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
services
at $0.01 per share
|
8/18/2009
|
(100,000 | ) | (100 | ) | (900 | ) | (1,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
loss for period ended
|
- | |||||||||||||||||||||
September
30, 2009 (unaudited)
|
(7,916 | ) | (7,916 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2009 (unaudited)
|
2,128,025 | $ | 2,128 | $ | 3,114 | $ | (13,937 | ) | $ | (8,695 | ) |
F-3
CETRONE
ENERGY COMPANY
|
||||||||||||
(A
Development Stage Enterprise)
|
||||||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||||||
Period
from
|
||||||||||||
January
28, 2008
|
||||||||||||
Nine
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
Through
|
||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
||||||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Net
gain (loss)
|
$ | (7,916 | ) | $ | (5,045 | ) | $ | (13,937 | ) | |||
Common
stock issued for services
|
- | 2,000 | ||||||||||
Cancellation
of common stock issued for services
|
(1,000 | ) | (1,000 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
- | |||||||||||
provided
(used) by operating activities:
|
- | |||||||||||
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable
|
5,925 | 2,975 | 8,900 | |||||||||
Net
cash provided (used) by operating activities
|
(2,991 | ) | (2,070 | ) | (4,037 | ) | ||||||
CASH
FLOWS PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Net
cash used by investing activities
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
CASH
FLOWS PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of common stock
|
- | 4,000 | 4,242 | |||||||||
Proceeds
from note payable - related party
|
- | 100 | 100 | |||||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
- | 4,100 | 4,342 | |||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(2,991 | ) | 2,030 | 305 | ||||||||
Cash
at beginning of period
|
3,296 | - | - | |||||||||
Cash
at end of period
|
$ | 305 | $ | 2,030 | $ | 305 | ||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
|
||||||||||||
Income
taxes paid
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
Interest
paid
|
- | - | - |
F-4
CETRONE
ENERGY COMPANY
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES
TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER
30, 2009
NOTE
1 – DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Cetrone
Energy Company was incorporated on January 28, 2008 in the State of
Nevada.
The
principal business of the Company is to develop “green” renewable fuel source
for agricultural operations, specifically biodiesel. The Company’s
year-end is December 31. The Company currently has no operations or realized
revenues from its planned principle business purpose and, in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 7, “Accounting and Reporting by
Development Stage Enterprises,” is considered a Development Stage
Enterprise.
NOTE
2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
This
summary of significant accounting policies of Cetrone Energy Company is
presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial
statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of
the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and
objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and have been
consistently applied in the preparation of the financial
statements.
Accounting
Method
The
Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of
accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Accounting
Pronouncements
In
October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605):
Multiple-Deliverables Revenue Arrangements a consensus of the FASB Emerging
Issues Task Force. This Update provides amendments to the
criteria in Subtopic 605-25 for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable
arrangements. The amendments in this Update establish a selling price
hierarchy for determining the selling price of a
deliverable. This Update will also replace the term fair value in the revenue
allocation guidance with selling price to clarify that
the allocation of revenue is based on entity-specific assumptions rather than
assumptions of a marketplace participant. The amendments in this Update will
eliminate the residual method of allocation and require that arrangement
consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all
deliverables using the relative selling price method. The amendments
in this Update will require that a vendor determine its best estimate of selling
price in a manner that is consistent with that used to determine the price to
sell the deliverable on a standalone basis. The amendments in this Update
significantly expand the disclosures related to a vendors multiple-deliverable
revenue arrangements.
The
amendments to this Update will significantly improve the reporting of
transactions to more closely reflect the underlying economics of the
transactions.
The
amendments to this Update will be effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or
after June 15, 2010, early adoption is permitted.
F-5
CETRONE
ENERGY COMPANY
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
NOTES
TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER
30, 2009
NOTE
2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (CONTINUED)
In
September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-12, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (Topic 820):Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset
Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). This Update provides
amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures –
Overall, for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that
calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The
amendments in the Update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to
measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the
amendments in this Update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the
investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its
equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles
of Topic 946 as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, including
measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the
investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in the Update
also require disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of
investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update. The
major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the
nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for
major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities
in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for all
investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update regardless of
whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical
expedient.
The
amendments in the Update improve financial reporting by permitting use of a
practival expedient, with appropriate disclosures, when measuring the fair value
of an alternative investment that does not have a readily determinable fair
value. The practical expedient reduces complexity and improves
consistency and comparability in the application of Topic 820, while reducing
the costs of applying Topic 820.
The
amendments in this Update are effective for interim and annual periods ending
after December 15, 2009. Early application is permitted in financial
statements for earlier interim and annual periods that have not been
issued.
In August
2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (Topic 820): Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. This update
provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
– Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This Update provides
clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market
for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entry is require to
measure fair value using one of more of the following techniques:
1.
|
A
valuation technique that uses:
|
a.
|
The
quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an
asset
|
b.
|
Quoted
prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as
assets.
|
2.
|
Another
valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of Topic
820.
|
F-6
CETRONE
ENERGY COMPANY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE
ENTERPRISE)
NOTES
TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER
30, 2009
NOTE
2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (CONTINUED)
The
amendments in this Update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a
liability, a reporting entity is not require to include a separate input or
adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that
prevents the transfer of the liability. Also, both a quoted price in
an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date and the
quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active
market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are
Level 1 fair value measurements. The amendments in the Update reduce potential
ambiguity in financial reporting when measuring the fair value of
liabilities.
The
guidance provided in this Update is effective for the first reporting period
beginning after issuance
In June
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB Statement
No. 162, which is codified in FASB ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (“ASC 105”). ASC 105 establishes the Codification as the
source of authoritative GAAP in the United States (the “GAAP hierarchy”)
recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and
interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under
authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for
SEC registrants. Once the Codification is in effect, all of its content will
carry the same level of authority and the GAAP hierarchy will be modified to
include only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative. ASC 105 is
effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. We adopted the requirements of ASC 105 in the
third quarter of 2009
In June
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R) (“SFAS No. 167”), which amends the consolidation
guidance applicable to variable interest entities. The amendments will
significantly affect the overall consolidation analysis under FASB ASC 810,
Consolidation and
changes the way entities account for securitizations and special purpose
entities as a result of the elimination of the QSPE concept in SFAS No.166. SFAS
No. 167 has not yet been codified and in accordance with ASC 105, remains
authoritative guidance until such time that it is integrated in the FASB ASC.
SFAS No. 167 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that
begins after November 15, 2009, early adoption is prohibited.
F-7
CETRONE
ENERGY COMPANY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE
ENTERPRISE)
NOTES
TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER
30, 2009
NOTE
2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (CONTINUED)
In June
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (“SFAS
No. 166”), which amends the derecognition guidance in SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,
eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity” (“QSPE”)
and requires more information about transfers of financial assets, including
securitization transactions as well as a company’s continuing exposure to the
risks related to transferred financial assets. SFAS No. 166 has not yet
been codified and in accordance with ASC 105, remains authoritative guidance
until such time that it is integrated in the FASB ASC. SFAS No. 166 is
effective for financial asset transfers occurring after the beginning of an
entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009 and early
adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this statement will have no material
affect on the financial statements.
FASB ASC
855 Subsequent Events
establishes principles and requirements for subsequent events. In particular,
this section sets forth:
a. The
period after the balance sheet date during which management of a
reporting
entity
shall evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition
or disclosure in the financial statements.
b. The
circumstances under which an entity shall recognize events or
transactions
occurring
after the balance sheet date in its financial statements.
c. The
disclosures that an entity shall make about events or transactions that occurred
after the balance sheet date.
In
accordance with this Section, an entity should apply the requirements to interim
or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this
section as of June 30, 2009.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
For
purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid
investments and short-term debt instruments with original maturities of three
months or less to be cash equivalents.
Derivative
Instruments
FASB ASC
815, Derivatives and
Hedging establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts, and for hedging activities. They require that an entity
recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet
and measure those instruments at fair value.
F-8
CETRONE
ENERGY COMPANY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE
ENTERPRISE)
NOTES
TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER
30, 2009
NOTE
2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (CONTINUED)
If
certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as a
hedge, the objective of which is to match the timing of gain or loss recognition
on the hedging derivative with the recognition of (i) the changes in the fair
value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk
or (ii) the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transaction. For a
derivative not designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or loss is
recognized in income in the period of change.
At
September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, the Company has not engaged in any
transactions that would be considered derivative instruments or hedging
activities.
Earnings Per
Share
FASB ASC
260, Earnings Per Share
provides for calculation of "basic" and "diluted" earnings per
share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed
by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted
average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings
per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the
earnings of an entity similar to fully diluted earnings per
share. Basic and diluted loss per share were the same, at the
reporting dates, as there were no common stock equivalents
outstanding.
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
The
Company's financial instruments as defined by FASB ASC 825-10-50 include cash, trade
accounts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses. All
instruments are accounted for on a historical cost basis, which, due to the
short maturity of these financial instruments, approximates fair value at
September 30, 2009.
FASB ASC
820 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy which
prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1.
Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2.
Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable
either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3.
Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which requires
the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The
Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis at September 30, 2009. The Company did not have any fair value
adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis during the period ended September 30, 2009.
F-9
CETRONE
ENERGY COMPANY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE
ENTERPRISE)
NOTES
TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER
30, 2009
NOTE
2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (CONTINUED)
Provision for
Taxes
Income
taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to ASC
740-10-25 Income Taxes –
Recognition. Under this approach, deferred income taxes are
recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between
the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at
each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax
assets if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than
not” standard imposed by ASC 740-10-25-5.
At
September 30, 2009, the Company had net deferred tax assets calculated at an
expected rate of 34% of approximately $4,700 principally arising from net
operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes. As management
of the Company cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company
will realize the benefit of the net deferred tax asset, a valuation allowance
equal to the net deferred tax asset has been established at September 30,
2009. The significant components of the deferred tax asset at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:
September
31, 2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||||||
Net
operating loss carryforward
|
$ | 13,900 | $ | 6,021 | ||||
Deferred
tax asset
|
4,700 | 2,047 | ||||||
Deferred
tax asset valuation allowance
|
$ | (4,700 | ) | $ | (2,047 | ) | ||
Net
deferred tax asset
|
- | - |
At
September 30, 2009, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $13,900 which expire in the year 2028. The above estimates are
based upon management’s decisions concerning certain elections which could
change the relationship between net income and taxable income. Management
decisions are made annually and could significantly vary from the
estimates.
Use of
Estimates
The
process of preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use
of estimates and assumptions regarding certain types of assets, liabilities,
revenues, and expenses. Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled
transactions and events as of the date of the financial
statements. Accordingly, upon settlement, actual results may differ
from estimated amounts.
Going
Concern
As shown
in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had negative working
capital and an accumulated deficit incurred through September 30,
2009.
F-10
CETRONE
ENERGY COMPANY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE
ENTERPRISE)
NOTES
TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER
30, 2009
NOTE
2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (CONTINUED)
The
Company is currently putting technology in place which will, if successful,
mitigate these factors which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability
to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not
include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of
recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be
necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.
Management
has established plans designed to increase the sales of the Company’s products,
and decrease debt. The Company plans to source raw materials needed
for remanufacture domestically, then produce the needed biofuel in small batches
tailored to the needs of customer demand until such time as larger quantities
can be produced. Profit margins will presumably increase as batch
size and storage limits can be increased. However, currently the Company is
dependent upon raising proceeds from the sale of its common stock or through
debt financing in order to continue the development of its proposed
business. Management intends to seek additional capital from new
equity securities offerings that will provide funds needed to increase
liquidity, fund internal growth and fully implement its business
plan.
An
estimated $120,000 is believed necessary to continue operations and increase
development through the next fiscal year. The timing and amount of
capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including demand for
products and services and the availability of opportunities for expansion
through affiliations and other business relationships.
Management
intends to seek new capital from new equity securities issuances to provide
funds needed to increase liquidity, fund internal growth, and fully implement
its business plan.
NOTE
3– CAPITAL STOCK
Common
Stock
The
Company is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of common stock. All
shares have equal voting rights, are non-assessable and have one vote per
share. Voting rights are not cumulative and, therefore, the holders
of more than 50% of the common stock could, if they choose to do so, elect all
of the directors of the Company.
In its
initial capitalization, the Company issued 2,200,000 shares of common stock for
a total of $2,000 cash, and $2,000 in services.
During
the year ended December 31, 2008 the Company sold 28,025 shares of common stock
pursuant to a registered offering at $0.08 per share for total cash of
$2,242.
F-11
CETRONE
ENERGY COMPANY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE
ENTERPRISE)
NOTES
TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER
30, 2009
NOTE
3– CAPITAL STOCK (CONTINUED)
During
the period ended September 30, 2009 the Company cancelled 100,000 shares of
common stock that had previously been issued for services valued at
$1,000.
NOTE
4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On May
16, 2008, an officer and director of the Company used $100 to open up a bank
account on behalf of the Company. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has not yet
reimbursed the officer for this cash advance. The funds advanced are
unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.
F-12
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF
OPERATIONS
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information
contained in the financial statements of Cetrone Energy Company (“CEC”) and the
notes which form an integral part of the financial statements which are attached
hereto.
The
financial statements mentioned above have been prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and are
stated in United States dollars.
CEC is a
start-up, development stage company, incorporated in the State of Nevada on
January 28, 2008 and with a fiscal year end of December 31. We
have no subsidiaries, affiliated companies or joint venture
partners.
We have
not conducted any revenue generating operations since our
inception. Our objective is to enter into the re-manufactured
bio-fuels industry. We anticipate that this industry will become more
and more completive over the course of the next twelve
months. Competitors within this market segment will more than likely
have superior financing and be better positioned than CEC.
CEC plans
to source raw materials needed for the remanufacture of bio-fuel domestically;
and then if and when, revenues allow we plan to produce our own bio-fuel in
small batches customized to meet the needs of specific clientele. If
and when we can establish clientele and subsequently increase revenue we plan to
produce larger quantities of bio-fuel as demand dictates within our market
segment. In order to begin generating bio-fuel CEC will be required
to source out raw materials including vegetable oil and petroleum
distillates. We currently have no contracts or agreements in place
with any supplier of the required raw materials and there can be no guarantee or
assurance that we will be capable of securing any such contract at favorable
terms in the future.
We
anticipate that profit margins will increase as batch size and storage limits
can be increased. We cannot guarantee however, that demand for our
product will ever increase. The vast majority of all agricultural
enterprises use distillate fuel oil in their operations. We believe
our intended product(s) could represent a cost effective environmental friendly
alternative to diesel fuel not only agricultural applications but also across
multiple market segments that rely on diesel fuel for their energy
needs.
We
anticipate that our largest target market will be agribusinesses. In
order to reach and grow within our market segment it is critical we establish
our bio-fuel products as reliable and available to potential customers. This
will require us to coordinate closely with third-party providers such as tanker
truck delivery services and potentially conversion services needed in order for
engines and machinery to effectively utilize our bio-fuel. It should
be noted that agribusiness is seasonally driven, as such during off seasons our
anticipated business would likely suffer and we cannot provide any assurance to
investors that we will be able to endure during these downtimes.
Principal
Office
Cetrone’s
management does not currently have policies regarding the acquisition or sale of
real estate assets primarily for possible capital gain or primarily for income.
Cetrone does not presently hold any investments or interests in real
estate, investments in real estate mortgages or securities of or interests in
persons primarily engaged in real estate activities.
Other
information
As of
September 30, 2009 CEC had 2,128,025 shares outstanding.
5
CEC
is responsible for filing various forms with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) such as Form 10K and Form 10Qs. The
shareholders may read and copy any material filed by CEC with the SEC at the
SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC,
20549. The shareholders may obtain information on the
operations of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that
contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information which
CEC has filed electronically with the SEC by assessing the website using the
following address: http://www.sec.gov. CEC
has no website at this time.
Planned Business
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information
contained in the financial statements of CEC and the notes, which forms an
integral part of the financial statements, which are attached
hereto.
DESCRIPTION
OF THE PROPERTY
We own no
property.
Plan
of Operation
We must
raise cash to implement our business plan. We will require approximately $25,000
for the next twelve months in order to continue our proposed
business. We have accounts payable of $8,900. We estimate that we
will require $11,300 for reporting requirements (bookkeeping, accounting, and
filing fees) this would leave the Company with $13,700 to expend towards the
development of its proposed business.
Since
incorporation, the Company has financed its operations through minimal initial
capitalization and nominal business activity. As of September 30, 2009 we
had $305 of cash on hand. We had total liabilities of $9,000 of which
expenses were primarily related to costs associated with maintaining reporting
company status with the Securities and Exchange Commission. On June
6, 2009 CEC filed a Post-Effective Amendment to the registration statement filed
on Form S-1, extending the offering period of their registered offering by
approximately one year.
To date,
the Company has not implemented its fully planned principal operations or
strategic business plan. Presently, CEC is attempting to secure sufficient
monetary assets to increase operations. CEC cannot assure any investor
that it will be able to enter into sufficient business operations adequate
enough to insure continued operations.
The
Company’s ability to commence operations is entirely dependent upon the proceeds
from their registered offering. If CEC does not raise at least the
minimum offering amount, it will be unable to establish a base of operations,
without which it will be unable to begin to generate any revenues in the future.
If CEC does not produce sufficient cash flow to support its operations
over the next 12 months, the Company will need to raise additional capital by
issuing capital stock in exchange for cash in order to continue as a going
concern. There are no formal or informal agreements to attain such
financing. CEC cannot assure any investor that, if needed, sufficient
financing can be obtained or, if obtained, that it will be on reasonable terms.
Without realization of additional capital, it would be unlikely for
operations to continue and any investment made by an investor would be lost in
its entirety.
CEC
management does not expect to incur research and development costs within the
next twelve months.
CEC
currently does not own any significant plant or equipment that it would seek to
sell in the near future
The
Company has not paid for expenses on behalf of any director. Additionally,
CEC believes that this policy shall not materially change within the next twelve
months.
6
Competitive
Factors
Bio-fuels
industry is fairly new and undeveloped at this time and it competes directly
with the established infrastructure of the domestic oil and gas
industry. As such, our competition represents a large, well
developed, mature industry with well established distribution and delivery
systems. Our direct competitors include companies like Exxon/Mobile,
Chevron, British Petroleum and Texaco. We will essentially begin be
providing a ‘boutique’ type fuel outlet providing more environmentally friendly
fuel at a competitive cost. There can be no assurance that Cetrone
Energy Company will ever be able to compete with any of the competitors
described herein. In addition, there may be other competitors the
company is unaware of at this time that would also impede or prevent the
company’s success.
Regulations
If and
when we conduct operations we will be required to comply with all regulations,
rules and directives of governmental authorities and agencies applicable to the
manufacturing of alternative fuels, specifically bio-fuel in the United States.
Moreover, if we ever enter into production, we may have expenses to comply with
permit and regulatory environment laws both locally and federally.
Employees
CEC
management does not anticipate the need to hire employees over the next twelve
(12) months. Currently, the Company believes the services provided by
its officer and director appears sufficient at this time. Our officer
and director do not have an employment agreement with us. We presently do not
have pension, health, annuity, insurance, profit sharing or similar benefit
plans; however, we may adopt such plans in the future. There are presently no
benefits available to any employee.
Investment
Policies
CEC does
not have an investment policy at this time. Any excess funds it has
on hand will be deposited in interest bearing notes such as term deposits or
short term money instruments. There are no restrictions on what the director is
able to invest or additional funds held by CEC. Presently CEC
does not have any excess funds to invest.
Since we
have had very minimal business activity, it is the opinion of management that
the most meaningful financial information relates primarily to current liquidity
and solvency. As at September 30, 2009, we had $305 cash on hand and
liabilities of $9000. The Company will require cash injections of
approximately $25,000 to enable the Company to meet its anticipated expenses
over the next twelve months. Unless we raise additional funds immediately, we
will be faced with a working capital deficiency that may result in the failure
of our business, resulting in a complete loss of any investment made into the
Company. Our future financial success will be dependent on the
success of obtaining capital.
Our
financial statements contained herein have been prepared on a going concern
basis, which assumes that we will be able to realize our assets and discharge
our obligations in the normal course of business. We incurred a net loss for the
period from the inception of our business on January 28, 2008 to September 30,
2009 of $13,937. We did not earn any revenues from operations during the
aforementioned period.
Critical Accounting
Policies. Our discussion and analysis of its financial
condition and results of operations, including the discussion on liquidity and
capital resources, are based upon our financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management re-evaluates its estimates and
judgments. The going concern basis of presentation assumes we will
continue in operation throughout the next fiscal year and into the foreseeable
future and will be able to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities and
commitments in the normal course of business. Certain conditions, discussed
below, currently exist which raise substantial doubt upon the validity of this
assumption. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of the uncertainty.
7
Our
intended business activities are dependent upon our ability to obtain third
party financing in the form of debt and equity and ultimately to generate future
profitable business activity. As of September 30, 2009, we have not generated
revenues, and have experienced negative cash flow from minimal activities. We
may look to secure additional funds through future debt or equity financings.
Such financings may not be available or may not be available on CEC
terms.
Trends. We
are a development stage business and have not generated any revenue and have no
prospects of generating any revenue in the foreseeable future. There
can be no guarantee or assurance that management will be successful in
developing the proposed business of the Company. Investors must be
aware that failure to do so would result in a complete loss of any investment
made into the Company
Limited Operating History; Need for
Additional Capital. There is no historical financial
information about us upon which to base an evaluation of our performance as a
business. We are a development stage company and have not generated any revenues
since our formation on January 28, 2008. We require immediate
additional capital in order to continue as a going concern. If we are
unable to secure approximately $25,000 of the course of the next twelve months
our business will fail and any investment made into the Company would be lost in
its entirety.
We cannot
guarantee we will be successful in our business activities or in any activity
that management directs the business. Our business is subject to
risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including
limited capital resources, and possible cost overruns due to price and cost
increases in services.
Results
of Operations – Since inception to September 30, 2009.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, we had a net loss of $7,916 compared to a
net loss of $5,045 for the nine months period ended September 30,
2008. The losses were a result of the Company having no revenues for
either of the periods. The expenses for these periods were related to start-up
costs and fees associated with maintaining reporting company
status. The Company had an accumulated loss since inception of
$13,937. We have not generated any revenue from operations
since inception. Our accumulated loss from our date of inception
represents various expenses incurred with organizing the company, undertaking
audits, recognizing management fees and general office expenses.
Balance Sheet as at September 30,
2009. We had $305 of cash available as at September 30, 2009.
Our total liabilities at September 30, 2009 were $9,000. Total shares
issued outstanding, as at September 30, 2009, was 2,128,025. The
total shares issued and outstanding was decreased by 100,000 common shares for
this period as the result of the cancellation of the shares issued to Walker,
Bannister, and Dunn. The cancellation of shares was mutually agreed
upon by both parties on August 18, 2009.
DISCLOSURE
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form
10-Q contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements. The words
“expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “believe,” and similar
expressions and variations thereof are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. Such forward-looking statements include statements regarding, among
other things, (a) our estimates of raw material, (b) our projected
sales and profitability, (c) our growth strategies, (d) anticipated
trends in our industry, (e) our future financing plans, (f) our
anticipated needs for working capital and (g) the benefits related to
ownership of our common stock. This information may involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results,
performance, or achievements to be materially different from the future results,
performance, or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking
statements for the reasons, among others, described within the various sections
of this Form 10-Q.
In light
of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the
forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q will in fact occur as
projected. We undertake no obligation to release publicly any updated
information about forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
occurring after the date of this Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
8
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MAKET
RISK
We
believe that there have been no significant changes in our market risk exposures
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Michael
Cetrone, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as required by Exchange
Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on
that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer concluded
that these disclosure controls and procedures are not effective. See
below within this section “CONCLUSION” for specifics of why the controls and
procedures were determined to be ineffective.
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting. See below within this section “CONCLUSION” for management’s plans
relating to controls and procedures in the future.
CEO/CFO
CERTIFICATIONS
Appearing
immediately following the Signatures section of this Amended Quarterly Report
there are two separate forms of "Certifications" of the CEO/CFO, Michael
Cetrone. The second form of Certification is required in accord with
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Section 302 Certification).
This section of the Quarterly Report, which you are currently reading is
the information concerning the Controls Evaluation referred to in the Section
302 Certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the
Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics
presented.
DISCLOSURE
CONTROLS AND INTERNAL CONTROLS
Disclosure
Controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that
information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), such as this Quarterly Report, is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) rules
and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed with the objective of
ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Internal Controls are procedures which are
designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that (1) our
transactions are properly authorized; (2) our assets are safeguarded against
unauthorized or improper use; and (3) our transactions are properly recorded and
reported, all to permit the preparation of our financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our disclosure
controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving their objectives.
LIMITATIONS
ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS
The
Company's management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our
Disclosure Controls or our Internal Controls will prevent all error and all
fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the
control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must
reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the
inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if
any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations
include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls
can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two
or more people, or by management override of the
control.
9
The
design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions
about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any
design will succeed achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be
detected.
CONCLUSION
In
accordance with SEC requirements, the CEO/CFO note that, as of the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 covered by this report, there were material weaknesses in our
Internal Controls.
•
Policies and Procedures for the Financial Close and Reporting Process —
Currently there are no policies or procedures that clearly define the roles in
the financial close and reporting process. The various roles and
responsibilities related to this process should be defined, documented, updated
and communicated. Failure to have such policies and procedures in place amounts
to a material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial
reporting processes.
•
Representative with Financial Expertise — For the period ending September 30,
2009, the Company did not have a representative with the requisite knowledge and
expertise to review the financial statements and disclosures at a sufficient
level to monitor the financial statements and disclosures of the Company.
Failure to have a representative with such knowledge and expertise amounts to a
material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial
reporting processes.
•
Adequacy of Accounting Systems at Meeting Company Needs — The accounting system
in place at the time of the assessment lacks the ability to provide high quality
financial statements from within the system, and there were no procedures in
place or built into the system to ensure that all relevant information is
secure, identified, captured, processed, and reported within the accounting
system. Failure to have an adequate accounting system with procedures to ensure
the information is secure and accurately recorded and reported amounts to a
material weakness to the Company’s internal controls over its financial
reporting processes.
•
Segregation of Duties — Management has identified a significant general lack of
definition and segregation of duties throughout the financial reporting
processes. Due to the pervasive nature of this issue, the lack of adequate
definition and segregation of duties amounts to a material weakness to the
Company’s internal controls over its financial reporting processes.
•
Lack of Audit Committee and Outside Directors in the Company’s Board of
Directors - We do not have a functioning audit committee or outside directors on
our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment
and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures.
In light
of the foregoing, once we have the adequate funds, management plans to develop
the following additional procedures to help address these material
weaknesses:
• Cetrone
will create and refine a structure in which critical accounting policies and
estimates are identified, and together with other complex areas, are subject to
multiple reviews by accounting personnel. In addition, we plan to enhance and
test our month-end and year-end financial close process. Additionally, our audit
committee will increase its review of our disclosure controls and procedures. We
also intend to develop and implement policies and procedures for the financial
close and reporting process, such as identifying the roles, responsibilities,
methodologies, and review/approval process. We believe these actions will
remediate the material weaknesses by focusing additional attention and resources
in our internal accounting functions. However, the material weaknesses will not
be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a
sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that
these controls are operating effectively.
10
PART II
– OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are
no legal proceedings to which CEC or is a party or is subject, nor to the best
of management’s knowledge are any material legal proceedings
contemplated.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
There has
been no change in our securities since the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There
have been no matters brought forth to the securities holders to vote upon during
this quarter.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) (3) Exhibits
The
following exhibits are included as part of this report:
31.1
|
8650
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
|
32.1
|
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|
Reports
on Form 8-K
Form 8-k
filed on November 9, 2009 and amended on November 16, 2009- ITEM 4.01
CHANGES IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
11
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
CETRONE
ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
Date:
November 20, 2009
|
/S/
MICHAEL CETRONE
|
Chief
Executive Officer, President and Director Chief Financial Officer, Chief
Accounting Officer, and Director
|
|
12