Biostax Corp. - Quarter Report: 2017 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
From the transition period from ___________ to ____________
Commission File Number __________________
IMMUNE THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Florida | 59-3226705 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (IRS Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
37 North Orange Ave, Suite 607, Orlando, FL 32801
(Address of principal executive offices)
888-613-8802
(Issuer’s telephone number)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes [X] No [ ].
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ].
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer [ ] | Accelerated Filer [ ] | ||
Non-Accelerated Filer [ ] | Smaller Reporting Company [X] | ||
Emerging Growth Company [X] |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]
Indicate by a check mark whether the company is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act: Yes [ ] No [X]
As of November 14, 2017 there were 383,532,473 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | ||
Item 1 | Financial Statements | 6 |
Item 2 | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations | 30 |
Item 3 | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 39 |
Item 4 | Controls and Procedures | 39 |
PART II OTHER INFORMATION | ||
Item 1 | Legal Proceedings | 40 |
Item 1A | Risk Factors | |
Item 2 | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 40 |
Item 3 | Default upon Senior Securities | 41 |
Item 4 | Mine Safety Disclosures | |
Item 5 | Other Information | |
Item 6 | Exhibits | 42 |
2 |
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are considered forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) concerning our business, results of operations, economic performance and/or financial condition, based on management’s current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and projections. Forward-looking statements are included, for example, in the discussions about:
● | strategy; | |
● | new product discovery and development; | |
● | current or pending clinical trials; | |
● | our products’ ability to demonstrate efficacy or an acceptable safety profile; | |
● | actions by the FDA and other regulatory authorities; | |
● | product manufacturing, including our arrangements with third-party suppliers; | |
● | product introduction and sales; | |
● | royalties and contract revenues; | |
● | expenses and net income; | |
● | credit and foreign exchange risk management; | |
● | liquidity; | |
● | asset and liability risk management; | |
● | the outcome of litigation and other proceedings; | |
● | intellectual property rights and protection; | |
● | economic factors; | |
● | competition; and | |
● | legal risks. |
Any statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “aims,” “plans,” “may,” “could,” “will,” “will continue,” “seeks,” “should,” “predict,” “potential,” “outlook,” “guidance,” “target,” “forecast,” “probable,” “possible” or the negative of such terms and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are subject to change and may be affected by risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and are generally beyond our control. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement in light of new information or future events, except as required by law, although we intend to continue to meet our ongoing disclosure obligations under the U.S. securities laws and other applicable laws.
3 |
We caution you that a number of important factors could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements, and therefore you should not place too much reliance on them. These factors include, among others, those described herein, under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report and in our other public reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It is not possible to predict or identify all such factors, and therefore the factors that are noted are not intended to be a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties that may affect forward-looking statements. If these or other risks and uncertainties materialize, or if the assumptions underlying any of the forward-looking statements prove incorrect, our actual performance and future actions may be materially different from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. We can offer no assurance that our estimates or expectations will prove accurate or that we will be able to achieve our strategic and operational goals.
Any statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “aims,” “plans,” “may,” “could,” “will,” “will continue,” “seeks,” “should,” “predict,” “potential,” “outlook,” “guidance,” “target,” “forecast,” “probable,” “possible” or the negative of such terms and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are subject to change and may be affected by risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and are generally beyond our control. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement in light of new information or future events, except as required by law, although we intend to continue to meet our ongoing disclosure obligations under the U.S. securities laws and other applicable laws.
Forward-looking statements are based on information we have when those statements are made or management’s good faith belief as of that time with respect to future events, and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to:
● | our lack of operating history; | |
● | our current and future capital requirements and our ability to satisfy our capital needs; | |
● | our inability to keep up with industry competition; | |
● | interpretations of current laws and the passages of future laws; | |
● | acceptance of our business model by investors and our ability to raise capital; | |
● | our drug discovery and development activities may not result in products that are approved by the applicable regulatory authorities. Even if our drug candidates do obtain regulatory approval they may never achieve market acceptance or commercial success; | |
● | our reliance on key personnel, including our ability to attract and retain scientists; | |
● | our reliance on third party manufacturing, some of which is outside the United States and may therefore be subject to political, economic and other uncertainties, to supply drugs for clinical trials and sales; | |
● | our limited distribution organization with no sales and marketing staff; | |
● | our being subject to product liability claims; | |
● | our reliance on key personnel, including our ability to attract and retain scientists; | |
● | legislation or regulation that may increase the cost of our business or limit our service and product offerings; | |
● | risks related to our intellectual property, including our ability to adequately protect intellectual property rights; | |
● | risks related to government regulation, including our ability to obtain approvals for the commercialization of some or all of our drug candidates, and ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review which may result in significant additional expense and subject us to penalties if we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements; and | |
● | our ability to obtain regulatory approvals in foreign jurisdictions to allow us to market our products internationally. |
4 |
Moreover, new risks regularly emerge and it is not possible for our management to predict or articulate all risks we face, nor can we assess the impact of all risks on our business or the extent to which any risk, or combination of risks, may cause actual results to differ from those contained in any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements included in this prospectus are based on information available to us on the date of this Annual Report. Except to the extent required by applicable laws or rules, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained above and throughout this Annual Report.
JUMPSTART OUR BUSINESS STARTUPS ACT
We qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 101 of the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act (“JOBS Act”) as we do not have more than $1,000,000,000 in annual gross revenue and did not have such amount as of December 31, 2016, the last day of our last fiscal year. We are electing to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards under Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act.
As an emerging growth company, we are permitted to, and intend to, rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are otherwise applicable to public companies. These provisions include, but are not limited to:
● | being permitted to present only two years of audited financial statements and only two years of related “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this annual report; | |
● | not being requested to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”); | |
● | reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports, proxy statements and registration statements; and | |
● | exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. |
We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest to occur of: (i) our reporting $1 billion or more in annual gross revenues; (ii) the end of fiscal year 2019; (iii) our issuance, in a three year period, of more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt; and (iv) the end of the fiscal year in which the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeded $700 million on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter
5 |
IMMUNE THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current Assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 22,570 | $ | 74,389 | ||||
Inventories | 214,327 | - | ||||||
Total current assets | 236,897 | 74,389 | ||||||
Fixed Assets: | ||||||||
Computer equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $8,445 and $7,888 respectively | 2,798 | 1,850 | ||||||
Deposits | 200 | 200 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 239,895 | $ | 76,439 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | ||||||||
Current Liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 2,222,814 | $ | 1,818,605 | ||||
Accrued liabilities | 2,009,660 | 3,156,759 | ||||||
Notes payable, net of debt discount | 4,361,241 | 4,225,419 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 8,593,715 | 9,200,783 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 8,593,715 | 9,200,783 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11) | ||||||||
Stockholders’ Deficit: | ||||||||
Common stock - par value $0.0001; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 357,140,708 and 250,428,133 shares issued and outstanding respectively | 35,714 | 25,043 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital | 365,314,385 | 360,420,026 | ||||||
Stock issuances due | 774,226 | 962,429 | ||||||
Prepaid services | (611,663 | ) | (822,500 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit | (369,390,460 | ) | (365,718,976 | ) | ||||
Deficit attributable to common stockholders | (3,877,798 | ) | (5,133,978 | ) | ||||
Non-controlling interest | (4,476,022 | ) | (3,990,366 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ deficit | (8,353,820 | ) | (9,124,344 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit | $ | 239,895 | $ | 76,439 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6 |
IMMUNE THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2017 | September 30, 2016 | September 30, 2017 | September 30, 2016 | |||||||||||||
Revenues, net | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 3,463 | ||||||||
Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 620,905 | 1,031,075 | 1,842,778 | 2,864,333 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expense | 109,340 | 247,019 | 362,110 | 295,438 | ||||||||||||
Stock issued for services G&A | 446,002 | 1,225,353 | 1,537,292 | 4,403,951 | ||||||||||||
Warrant valuation | 272,707 | 187,850 | 590,605 | 2,756,404 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 269 | 299 | 557 | 1,280 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,449,223 | 2,691,596 | 4,333,342 | 10,321,406 | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations | (1,449,223 | ) | (2,691,596 | ) | (4,333,342 | ) | (10,317,943 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (118,878 | ) | (978,275 | ) | (822,789 | ) | (2,331,296 | ) | ||||||||
Gain/(loss) on settlement of debt | (31,741 | ) | (274,071 | ) | 998,991 | (1,978,754 | ) | |||||||||
Total other income (expense) | (150,619 | ) | (1,252,346 | ) | 176,202 | (4,310,050 | ) | |||||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,599,842 | ) | $ | (3,943,942 | ) | $ | (4,157,140 | ) | $ | (14,627,993 | ) | ||||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest | (217,574 | ) | (7,441 | ) | (485,656 | ) | (161,490 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders | $ | (1,382,268 | ) | $ | (3,936,501 | ) | $ | (3,671,484 | ) | $ | (14,466,503 | ) | ||||
Basic loss per share attributable to common shareholders | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding | 341,109,212 | 226,843,113 | 301,844,205 | 208,399,547 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
7 |
IMMUNE THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017
(Unaudited)
Common Stock | Additional Paid-in | Stock To | Prepaid | Accumulated | Non-Controlling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Be Issued | Services | Deficit | Interest | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2016 | 250,428,133 | $ | 25,043 | $ | 360,420,026 | $ | 962,429 | $ | (822,500 | ) | $ | (365,718,976 | ) | $ | (3,990,366 | ) | $ | (9,124,344 | ) | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock for prepaid services | 27,245,460 | 2,725 | 1,818,276 | (494,546 | ) | (1,060,000 | ) | - | - | 266,455 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prepaid services | - | - | - | - | 1,270,837 | - | - | 1,270,837 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock for accrued interest | 3,787,570 | 379 | 201,000 | - | - | - | - | 201,379 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock in exchange for debt | 39,293,111 | 3,929 | 1,831,577 | 56,343 | - | - | - | 1,891,849 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock for cash and exercise of warrants | 36,386,434 | 3,638 | 452,901 | 250,000 | - | - | - | 706,539 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance and modification of common stock warrants | - | - | 590,605 | - | - | - | - | 590,605 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | - | - | - | - | - | (3,671,484 | ) | (485,656 | ) | (4,157,140 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of September 30, 2017 | 357,140,708 | $ | 35,714 | $ | 365,314,385 | $ | 774,226 | $ | (611,663 | ) | $ | (369,390,460 | ) | $ | (4,476,022 | ) | $ | (8,353,820 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statement.
8 |
IMMUNE THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Nine months ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2017 | September 30, 2016 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (4,157,140 | ) | $ | (14,627,993 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows used in operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 557 | 1,280 | ||||||
Stock issued, and amortization of stock issued, for prepaid services | 1,270,837 | 2,315,190 | ||||||
Gain on settlement of debt | (998,991 | ) | 1,978,754 | |||||
Stock issued for services | 266,456 | 2,111,259 | ||||||
Stock warrant expense | 590,605 | 2,756,404 | ||||||
Stock issued for interest | 378 | 191,750 | ||||||
Amortization of debt discount | 60,347 | 727,612 | ||||||
Accounts receivable write off | 2,661 | |||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | 678,162 | 103,155 | ||||||
Accounts receivable | 13,536 | |||||||
Accrued liabilities | 887,608 | 2,093,015 | ||||||
Inventory | (214,327 | ) | - | |||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (1,615,508 | ) | (2,333,377 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Purchases of computer equipment | (1,505 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (1,505 | ) | - | |||||
- | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Payment of notes payable | (321,846 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds from sale of stock and exercise of warrants | 706,540 | 200,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable | 1,180,500 | 2,132,380 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 1,565,194 | 2,332,380 | ||||||
Net decrease in cash | (51,819 | ) | (997 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 74,389 | 23,149 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 22,570 | $ | 22,152 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
9 |
IMMUNE THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Nine months ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2017 | September 30, 2016 | |||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 29,500 | $ | 18,667 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Common stock issued for loan expense and interest | $ | - | $ | 191,750 | ||||
Debt discount | $ | 50,000 | $ | - | ||||
Conversion of debt and accrued interest to common stock | $ | 3,051,969 | $ | - | ||||
Shares issued for accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 254,738 | $ | - | ||||
Cashless exercise of warrants | $ | 1,705 | $ | - | ||||
Accounts payable paid directly by lender | $ | 273,821 | $ | - | ||||
Settlement paid by lender | $ | 150,000 | $ | - | ||||
Common stock issued for prepaid services | $ | 266,455 | $ | 2,088,759 | ||||
Estimated gain/(loss) on debt conversion | $ | 215,000 | $ | - |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
10 |
Immune Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2017
(Unaudited)
1. Organization and Description of Business
Immune Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) was initially incorporated in Florida on December 2, 1993 as Resort Clubs International, Inc. (“Resort Clubs”). It was formed to manage and market golf course properties in resort markets throughout the United States. Galliano International Ltd. (“Galliano”) was incorporated in Delaware on May 27, 1998 and began trading in November 1999 through the filing of a 15C-211. On November 10, 2004, Galliano merged with Resort Clubs. Resort Clubs was the surviving corporation. On August 23, 2010, Resort Clubs changed its name to pH Environmental Inc. (“pH Environmental”).
On April 23, 2012, pH Environmental completed a name change to TNI BioTech, Inc., and on April 24, 2012, we executed a share exchange agreement for the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of TNI BioTech IP, Inc. On September 4, 2014, a majority of our shareholders approved an amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, to change our name to Immune Therapeutics, Inc. We filed our name change amendment with the Secretary of State of Florida on October 27, 2014 changing our name to Immune Therapeutics, Inc.
The Company currently operates out of Orlando, Florida. In July 2012, the Company’s focus turned to acquiring patents that would protect and advance the development of new uses of opioid-related immune- therapies, such as low dose naltrexone (“LDN”) and Methionine [Met5]-enkephalin (“MENK”). The Company’s therapies are believed to stimulate and/or regulate the immune system in such a way that they provide the potential to treat a variety of diseases. We believe our therapies may be able to correct abnormalities or deficiencies in the immune system in diseases such as HIV infection, autoimmune disease, immune disorders, or cancer; all of which can lead to disease progression and life-threatening situations when the immune system is not functioning optimally.
In October 2012, the Company formed TNI BioTech International, Ltd., a BVI company in Tortola, British Virgin Islands, which was set up to allow the Company to market and sell LDN in those countries outside the U.S. in which we have been able to obtain approval to sell the Company’s products.
In August 2013, the Company formed its United Kingdom subsidiary, TNI BioTech, LTD (the “UK Subsidiary”). The UK Subsidiary received approval to be considered a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise (“SME”) with the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) on August 21, 2013. The designation provides the UK Subsidiary with significant discounts when holding meetings or submitting filings to the EMA. On September 19, 2013, the UK Subsidiary submitted a pre-submission package to the EMA regarding Crohn’s Disease. The EMA granted the UK Subsidiary a meeting that took place on September 27, 2013. The UK Subsidiary is eligible to benefit from the provisions for administrative and financial assistance for SMEs set out in Regulation (EC) No 2049/2005. The Company will determine whether or not to apply to obtain EMA benefits once funding becomes available.
In December 2013, the Company formed a new subsidiary, Cytocom Inc., to focus on conducting LDN and MENK clinical trials in the United States. In December 2014, the Company finalized the distribution of common stock of Cytocom Inc. to its shareholders. As part of the transaction, the Company retained exclusive rights to all international patents, in-country approvals, formulations, trademarks, manufacturing, marketing, sales, and distributions rights in emerging nations, including Africa, Central America, South America, Russia, India, China, Far East, and The Commonwealth of Independent States (former Soviet Union). The Company will continue to have access to existing clinical data as well as any new data generated by Cytocom Inc. during drug development. On December 8, 2014, the number of Cytocom Inc. shares of common stock that were issued to our shareholders totaled 113,242,522 shares. In connection with the transaction, Cytocom Inc. issued 140,100,000 shares of its common stock to the Company, which gave the Company a 55.3% stake in Cytocom Inc. on that date. In April 2016, the Board of Directors and a majority of shareholders of Cytocom approved a reverse stock split of Cytocom’s outstanding common stock with one new share of stock for each twenty old shares of common stock. Cytocom effectuated and finalized the reverse split in June 2016. At September 30, 2017, the Company’s equity interest had been further reduced to 10%, by subsequent issuances of Cytocom common stock to shareholders in settlement of notes payable.
11 |
In March 2014, the Company incorporated Airmed Biopharma Limited, an Irish corporation with an address in Dublin, Ireland, and Airmed Holdings Limited, an Irish company domiciled in Bermuda. The Irish companies were set up to benefit from incentives granted by the Irish government for the establishment of pharmaceutical companies (many of the world’s leading pharmaceutical companies have located in Ireland), and so that the Company could take advantage of Ireland’s status as a member of the European Union and the European Economic Area. An Irish limited liability company enjoys a low corporate income tax rate of 12.5%, one of the lowest in the world. The Irish-domiciled company hopes to qualify for tax incentives for Irish holding/headquartered companies and to benefit from the network of double tax treaties that reduce withholding taxes. TNI BioTech International, Ltd. will manage our international distribution, using product that is manufactured in Ireland and elsewhere.
Today, Immune Therapeutics is focused on the commercialization of affordable non-toxic immunotherapies focused on the activation and rebalancing of the body’s immune system. We believe that stimulating the body’s immune system remains one of the most promising approaches in the treatment of Cancers, HIV, Autoimmune Diseases, inflammatory conditions and other opportunistic infections for chronic often life-threatening diseases through the mobilization of the body’s immune system in Emerging Nations using existing clinical data.
Cytocom Inc, is a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company focused on the development of the first affordable non-toxic immunodulator for the treatment of inflammatory diseases, immune-related disorders, and cancer and is responsible for the development of our patented therapies with the FDA and EMA.
As of this date, neither we nor our collaboration partners are permitted to market our drug candidates in the United States until we receive approval of a New Drug Application from the FDA. Neither we nor our collaboration partners have submitted an application for or received marketing approval for any of our drug candidates. Obtaining approval of an NDA can be a lengthy, expensive and uncertain process.
Going Concern
The Company experienced a net loss from operations of $4,333,342, and used cash and cash equivalents for operations in the amount of $1,615,508 during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, resulting in stockholder’s deficit of $8,353,820 at that date.
The Company has incurred significant net losses since inception and has relied on its ability to fund its operations through private equity financings. Management expects operating losses and negative cash flows to continue at more significant levels in the future. As the Company continues to incur losses, transition to profitability is dependent upon the successful development, approval, and commercialization of its product candidate and the achievement of a level of revenues adequate to support the Company’s cost structure. The Company may never achieve profitability, and unless and until it does, the Company will continue to need to raise additional cash. Management intends to fund future operations through the sale of products, additional private or public debt or equity offerings, and it may also seek additional capital through arrangements with strategic partners or from other sources. Based on the Company’s operating plan, existing working capital at September 30, 2017 was not sufficient to meet the cash requirements to fund planned operations through September 30, 2018 without additional sources of cash. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern and do not include adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. This basis of accounting contemplates the recovery of the Company’s assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments, unless otherwise indicated) necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been made. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of trends or of results to be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 (including the notes thereto) set forth in Form 10-K.
12 |
The Company qualifies as an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 101 of the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act (“JOBS Act”) as we do not have more than $1,000,000,000 in annual gross revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016. We are electing to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards under Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue on sales to customers and distributors upon satisfaction of our performance obligations when the goods are shipped. For consignment sales, we recognize revenue when the goods are pulled from consignment inventory.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This standard provides a single set of guidelines for revenue recognition to be used across all industries and requires additional disclosures. It is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. This standard permits early adoption and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this standard on our financial position and results of operations, as well as our selected transition method. Based on our preliminary assessment, we believe the new standard will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations, as we do not expect to change the manner or timing of recognizing revenue on a majority of our revenue transactions once we commence revenue-generating activities.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This standard requires all leases that have a term of over 12 months to be recognized on the balance sheet with the liability for lease payments and the corresponding right-of-use asset initially measured at the present value of amounts expected to be paid over the term. Recognition of the costs of these leases on the income statement will be dependent upon their classification as either an operating or a financing lease. Costs of an operating lease will continue to be recognized as a single operating expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Costs for a financing lease will be disaggregated and recognized as both an operating expense (for the amortization of the right-of-use asset) and interest expense (for interest on the lease liability). This standard will be effective for our interim and annual periods beginning January 1, 2019, and must be applied on a modified retrospective basis to leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the timing of adoption and the potential impact of this standard on our consolidated financial position, but we do not expect it to have a material impact on our results of operations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from such estimates.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Short-Term Investments
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities at the date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include bank demand deposits, marketable securities with maturities of three months or less at purchase, and money market funds that invest primarily in certificates of deposits, commercial paper and U.S. government and U.S. government agency obligations. Cash equivalents are reported at fair value.
13 |
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash and cash equivalents. The Company is exposed to credit risk, subject to federal deposit insurance, in the event of a default by the financial institutions holding its cash and cash equivalents to the extent of amounts recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The cash accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. At September 30, 2017, the Company has no cash balances in excess of insured limits.
Segment and Geographic Information
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company views its operations and manages its business in one operating segment and does not segment the business for internal reporting or decision making.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In accordance with the reporting requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, the Company calculates the fair value of its assets and liabilities which qualify as financial instruments under this standard and includes this additional information in the notes to the financial statements when the fair value is different than the carrying value of those financial instruments. Cash, cash equivalents and accounts payable are accounted for at cost which approximates fair value due to the relatively short maturity of these instruments. The carrying value of notes payable also approximate fair value since they bear market rates of interest and other terms. None of these instruments are held for trading purposes.
Fair Value Measurements
The ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and requires certain disclosures about fair value measurements. In general, fair values of financial instruments are based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and the customer’s creditworthiness, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time.
Inventory
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost based on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Inventory that can be used in either the production of clinical or commercial products is expensed as research and development costs when identified for use in a clinical trials or clinical manufacturing campaigns.
Fixed Assets
Fixed assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is determined on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which generally range from three to five years. Maintenance and repairs are charged against expense as incurred. Depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 was $269 and $299, respectively.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or change in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable as prescribed by ASC Topic 360-10-05, “Property, Plant and Equipment.” If the carrying amount of the asset, including any intangible assets associated with that asset, exceeds its estimated undiscounted net cash flow, before interest, the Company will recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between its carrying amount and its estimated fair value.
14 |
Research and Development Costs
Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred and are typically comprised of salaries and benefits, pre-clinical studies, clinical trial activities, drug development and manufacturing, fees paid to consultants and other entities that conduct certain research and development activities on the Company’s behalf and third-party service fees, including clinical research organizations and investigative sites. Costs for certain development activities, such as clinical trials are recognized based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using data such as patient enrollment, clinical site activations, or information provided by vendors on their actual costs incurred. Payments for these activities are based on the terms of the individual arrangements, which may differ from the pattern of costs incurred, and are reflected in the financial statements as operating expenses.
Income Taxes
The Company follows ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the asset will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The standard addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under ASC Topic 740, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the tax authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ASC Topic 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. At the date of adoption, and as of September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company does not have a liability for unrecognized tax uncertainties.
The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as income tax expense. As of September 30, 2017, and 2016, the Company has not accrued any interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
Stock-Based Compensation and Issuance of Stock for Non-Cash Consideration
The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options, based on estimated fair values equaling either the market value of the shares issued or the value of consideration received, whichever is more readily determinable. The majority of the non-cash consideration pertains to services rendered by consultants and others and has been valued at the fair value of the Company’s common stock at the date of the agreement.
The Company’s accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of ASC Topic 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees.” The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor’s performance is complete.
Non-controlling Interest
In accordance with ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, the Company consolidates Cytocom, Inc. The non-controlling interests in Cytocom represent the interests of outside shareholders in the equity and results of operations of Cytocom.
15 |
Net Income (Loss) per Share
Basic net income (loss) per share (“EPS”) is calculated in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260, “Earnings Per Share.” Basic net income or loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of common share equivalents outstanding for the period determined using the treasury-stock method. Dilutive common stock equivalents are comprised of common stock purchase warrants outstanding.
A calculation of basic net loss per share follows:
For
the three months ended September 30, |
For
the nine months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
Net Profit/(Loss) | $ | (1,382,268 | ) | $ | (3,936,501 | ) | $ | (3,671,484 | ) | $ | (14,466,503 | ) | ||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding | 341,109,212 | 226,843,113 | 301,844,205 | 208,399,547 | ||||||||||||
Profit/(Loss) per share outstanding | ||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) |
The Company’s potential dilutive securities, which include warrants, have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect would be to reduce the net loss per share. The following shares of potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computations of diluted weighted average shares outstanding:
As of September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Warrants to purchase Common stock | 59,485,667 | 32,623,908 | ||||||
59,485,667 | 32,623,908 |
Recent Accounting Standards
During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, there were several new accounting pronouncements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Each of these pronouncements, as applicable, has been or will be adopted by the Company. Management does not believe the adoption of any of these accounting pronouncements has had or will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
3. Inventory
The components of inventory are summarized as follows:
September 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
Raw materials | $ | 79,558 | $ | - | ||||
Work in process | 134,769 | - | ||||||
Finished goods | - | - | ||||||
Total inventory | $ | 214,327 | $ | - |
4. Fixed Assets
September 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
Fixed Assets: | ||||||||
Computer equipment | $ | 11,243 | $ | 9,738 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (8,445 | ) | (7,888 | ) | ||||
Fixed assets, net | $ | 2,798 | $ | 1,850 |
The Company utilizes the straight-line method for depreciation, using three to five-year depreciable asset lives. Depreciation expense was not material for all periods presented.
16 |
5. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other liabilities consist of the following:
September 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
Accrued payroll to officers and others | $ | 1,303,258 | $ | 1,126,261 | ||||
Accrued interest and penalties - notes payable | 594,875 | 1,902,018 | ||||||
Estimated legal settlement | 111,134 | 128,087 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 393 | 393 | ||||||
Total accrued liabilities | $ | 2,009,660 | $ | 3,156,759 |
6. Notes Payable
Notes payable consist of the following:
September 30, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
Promissory note issued July 29, 2014 to Ira Gaines. In 2016, the maturity date on the note was extended to December 1, 2017. The note earns interest at a rate of 18% per annum. | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | ||||
Promissory notes issued between November 26, 2014 and September 30, 2015, to raise up to $2,000,000 in debt. Lenders earn interest at a rate of 10% per annum, plus a pro-rata share of two percent of the Company’s gross receipts for sales of IRT-103-LDN in perpetuity. Notes will be repaid in 36 monthly installments of principal and interest commencing no later than October 15, 2015. Notes aggregating $286,000 were in default at September 30, 2017, as the Company was unable to pay installments on those notes on their due dates. No demands for repayment have been made by the lenders. | 286,000 | 286,000 | ||||||
Promissory notes issued between May 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016, and maturing between June 14, 2015 and September 30, 2017. Lenders on loans aggregating $505,994 earn interest at rates between 2% and 18% per annum. On loans aggregating $198,500, interest is payable in a fixed amount not tied to a specific interest rate. Notes aggregating $605,994 were in default at September 30, 2017, as the Company was unable to repay those notes on their due dates. No demands for repayment have been made by the lenders. | 704,494 | 704,494 | ||||||
Promissory notes issued by Cytocom Inc. between April 29, 2015 and December 31, 2015. Lenders earn interest at rates between 5% and 10% per annum. These notes mature on September 30, 2016. At September 30, 2017, the notes were in default, although no demand for repayment has been made by the lenders. | 425,000 | 425,000 | ||||||
Promissory note issued in December 2015. The lender earns interest at a rate of 10% per month. The note is repayable on March 9, 2016. On April 3, 2017, the Company settled the obligation. | - | 100,000 | ||||||
Promissory notes issued between May 5, 2016 and June 2, 2016 that mature between October 1, 2016 and January 31, 2017, and include stock conversion features, warrants and original issue debt discounts. The notes were repaid or converted into stock in the quarter ended September 30, 2017. | - | 554,882 | ||||||
Promissory notes issued to an officer of the Company effective November 3, 2015 and maturing November 3, 2016 for settlement of accrued payroll, bearing interest at 10% per annum and including a stock conversion feature. The Company was unable to repay the note at maturity and the note is in default. | 102,737 | 112,737 | ||||||
Promissory note issued in July 2016. The note was repayable on October 5, 2016 but was extended to December 31, 2016. The note earns interest at 6% per month. The Company was unable to repay the note at maturity and the note is in default. | 50,000 | 50,000 | ||||||
Promissory note issued in July 2016 with an original issue discount of $30,000. Net proceeds were $150,000. The note is repayable on April 7, 2017. $66,000 of the note was converted to stock. The Company was unable to repay the note at maturity and the note is in default. | 48,000 | 180,000 | ||||||
Promissory notes issued in August 2016 for $149,854 as a settlement of amounts owed to a law firm. The notes accrue interest at 5% per annum and are payable in 18 equal monthly installments of $8,641.88. The note was in default on September 30, 2017. | 43,209 | 120,987 | ||||||
Promissory notes issued between July 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016. Lenders earn interest at 2% per annum. The notes mature on September 30, 2017 and are in default. | 206,000 | 256,000 | ||||||
Notes aggregating $1,354,000 issued in the fourth quarter of 2016. The notes accrue interest at 2% per annum and mature between November 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017. As of November 14, 2017, $750,000 is in default. | 1,354,000 | 1,354,000 | ||||||
Notes aggregating $500,000 issued in the first quarter of 2017. The notes accrue interest at 2% per annum and mature between January 12, 2018 and June 30, 2018. As of November 14, 2017, $750,000 is in default. | 500,000 | - | ||||||
Promissory note issued January 25, 2017. The lenders earn interest at 7% per month. The note matures on July 5, 2017 and is in default. | 50,000 | - | ||||||
Notes aggregating $300,000 issued in the second quarter of 2017. The notes accrue interest at 2% per annum and mature between January 12, 2018 and June 30, 2018. | 300,000 | - | ||||||
Notes aggregating $191,800 issued in the third quarter of 2017. The notes accrue interest at 2% per annum and mature between June 16, 2018 and September 30, 2018. |
191,800 | - | ||||||
Less: Original issue discounts on notes payable and warrants issued with notes. | - | (18,681 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 4,361,241 | $ | 4,225,419 |
As of September 30, 2017, the Company had accrued $594,875 in unpaid interest and default penalties. During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, 4,694,017 shares with a fair value of $138,843 were issued or reserved for issuance by the Company for settlement of promissory notes.
17 |
7. Capital Structure—Common Stock and Common Stock Purchase Warrants
Each holder of common stock is entitled to vote on all matters and is entitled to one vote for each share held. No holder of shares of stock of any class shall be entitled as a matter of right to subscribe for or purchase or receive any part of any new or additional issue of shares of stock of any class, or of securities convertible into shares of stock or any class, whether now hereafter authorized or whether issued for money, for consideration other than money, or by way of dividend.
As of September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company was authorized to issue 500,000,000 common shares at a par value of $0.0001 per share.
As of September 30, 2017, the Company had 357,140,708 shares of common stock outstanding, and 250,428,133 outstanding as of December 31, 2016.
Stock Warrants
In the quarter ended September 30, 2017, there were 2,500,000 new warrants issued by the Company.
There were no modifications of the terms of any warrants issued by the Company in the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.
Following is a summary of outstanding stock warrants at September 30, 2017 and activity during the nine months then ended:
Number
of Shares |
Exercise
Price |
Weighted
Average Price |
||||||||||
Warrants as of December 31, 2016 | 59,191,904 | $ | 0.03-15.00 | $ | 0.35 | |||||||
Issued in 2017 | 36,300,228 | $ | 0.01-0.20 | $ | 0.04 | |||||||
Expired and forfeited in 2017 | 10,703,762 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.01 | |||||||
Exercised in 2017 | 25,302,703 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.01 | |||||||
Warrants as of September 30, 2017 | 59,485,667 | $ | 0.01-15.00 | $ | 0.36 |
Summary of outstanding warrants as of September 30, 2017:
Expiration Date | Number
of Shares |
Exercise Price |
Remaining Life (years) |
|||||||||
Fourth Quarter 2017 | 350,000 | $ | 1.50-9.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||
First Quarter 2018 | 127,500 | $ | 15.00 | 0.25 | ||||||||
Second Quarter 2018 | 33,334 | $ | 15.00 | 0.50 | ||||||||
Third Quarter 2018 | 250,000 | $ | 1.50 | 0.75 | ||||||||
Fourth Quarter 2018 | 6,089,166 | $ | 1.00-1.50 | 1.00 | ||||||||
First Quarter 2019 | 4,024,000 | $ | 0.50-2.00 | 1.25 | ||||||||
Second Quarter 2019 | 135,000 | $ | 0.07-0.23 | 1.50 | ||||||||
Third Quarter 2019 | 260,000 | $ | 0.50-1.50 | 1.75 | ||||||||
Fourth Quarter 2019 | 400,000 | $ | 0.14 | 2.00 | ||||||||
Second Quarter 2020 | 300,000 | $ | 0.50 | 2.50 | ||||||||
Fourth Quarter 2020 | 1,000,000 | $ | 0.20 | 3.00 | ||||||||
First Quarter 2021 | 12,600,000 | $ | 0.20 | 3.25 | ||||||||
Second Quarter 2021 | 11,150,000 | $ | 0.03-0.20 | 3.50 | ||||||||
Third Quarter 2021 | 5,016,667 | $ | 0.03-0.20 | 3.75 | ||||||||
Second Quarter 2022 | 1,750,000 | $ | 0.20 | 4.50 | ||||||||
Third Quarter 2022 | 2,500,000 | $ | 0.01 | 4.75 | ||||||||
Second Quarter 2023 | 2,000,000 | $ | 0.20 | 5.50 | ||||||||
Second Quarter 2032 | 11,500,000 | $ | 0.05 | 14.50 |
18 |
8. Stock Compensation
Shares Issued for Services
During the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company issued 1,700,000 and 5,790,910 shares of common stock respectively for consulting fees. The Company valued these shares at $61,000 and $900,090 respectively, based upon the fair value of the common stock at the dates of the agreements. The consulting fees are amortized over the contract periods which are typically between 12 and 24 months. The amortization of prepaid services totaled $446,002 and $1,225,353 for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the amortization of prepaid services totaled $1,537,292 and $4,403,951.
9. Income Taxes - Results of Operations
The Company considers the likelihood of changes by tax authorities in its filed income tax returns and recognizes a liability for or discloses potential significant changes that management believes are more likely than not to occur upon examination by tax authorities. Management has not identified any uncertain tax positions in income tax returns filed that require recognition or disclosure in the accompanying financial statements. The Company’s income tax returns for the past three years are subject to examination by tax authorities, and may change upon examination.
For financial reporting purposes, for the nine months ending September 30, 2017 and 2016, income before income taxes includes the following components:
September 30, 2017 | September 30, 2016 | |||||||
United States | $ | (4,157,140 | ) | $ | (14,627,993 | ) | ||
Foreign | - | |||||||
Total | $ | (4,157,140 | ) | $ | (14,627,993 | ) |
19 |
The expense (benefit) for income taxes consist of:
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Current: | ||||||||
Federal | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
State | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Foreign | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Total | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Deferred and other: | ||||||||
Federal | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
State | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Foreign | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
$ | - | $ | - | |||||
Total tax expense | $ | - | $ | - |
The Company has recognized no tax benefit for the losses generated for the periods through September 30, 2017. ASC Topic 740 requires that a valuation allowance be provided if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company’s ability to realize the benefit of its deferred tax asset will depend on the generation of future taxable income. Because the Company has yet to recognize revenue, we believe that a full valuation allowance should be provided.
The Company's effective tax rate for fiscal years 2016 and 2015 was 0%. The Company's tax rate can be affected by recurring items, such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income we earn in jurisdictions. It may also be affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but are not consistent from year to year.
As of December 31, 2016, the Company had estimated federal and state income tax net operating loss (“NOL”) carry-forwards of approximately $79,900,000, which will expire in 2032-2035.
10. Licenses and Supply Agreements
Patent and Subsidiary Acquisition
The Company entered into a share exchange agreement on April 24, 2012 to acquire all of the outstanding shares of TNI BioTech IP, Inc. (“TNI IP”), a biotechnology firm incorporated in Florida and formed to acquire patents related to the treatment of cancer and HIV/AIDS and autoimmune diseases, using Met-enkephalin (“MENK”) and Naltrexone (“LDN”). The goal of TNI IP’s management was to enable mankind and civilization to combat fatal diseases by activating and mobilizing the body’s own immune system using TNI IP’s patented use of MENK. The first patents acquired by TNI IP were acquired from Dr. Nicholas P. Plotnikoff and Professor Fengping Shan in 2012. TNI IP was acquired in exchange for 20,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, of which 8,000,000 shares were issued to Dr. Plotnikoff for the acquisition of patents and the remaining 12,250,000 shares were issued to the founders of TNI IP in exchange for all of their right, title and interest in their TNI IP shares. The goodwill arising on the acquisition of TNI BioTech IP, Inc. was valued at $98,000,000 and license agreements arising from the acquisition of TNI IP were valued at $16,006,000.
In connection with the share exchange, we entered into a Sale of Technology Agreement with Dr. Nicholas P. Plotnikoff on March 4, 2012, wherein Dr. Plotnikoff agreed to transfer and assign all of his rights, title and interest in: European Patent United Kingdom, Germany, France, Ireland EP 1401471 BI Methods for inducing sustained immune response; Russian Patent Russian Federation patent number 2313364; The Patent Office of the People’s Republic of China, Application No.: 200810165784.8 China Patent CN1015113407 A The Patent Office of the People’s Republic of China ISSN: 1006-2858 CN 21-1349/R; Patent Agencies Government of India Patent, Application number 1627/KOLNP/2003 number 220265 an Enkephalin Peptide Composition; and the US Patent Pending, US Patent Application 10/146.999 e. The Company received all the production formulations and technology designs from Dr. Plotnikoff necessary for the manufacturing, formulation, production and protocols of the MENK treatment of cancer and HIV/AIDS. As consideration for entering into the Sale of Technology Agreement, Dr. Plotnikoff received 8,000,000 shares of common stock, a royalty of a single-digit percentage on all sales of MENK and was granted the position of Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors.
20 |
At the time of the acquisition, the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets were determined using the fair market price for the Company’s common stock, which were exchanged for shares of TNI IP. In the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company performed an annual valuation to determine whether any goodwill or intangible assets that had been acquired by the Company were impaired. The result of this valuation was that material impairments were identified. The Company recognized an impairment of the goodwill arising on the acquisition of TNI IP of $98,000,000.
Patent License Agreements
On August 13, 2012, the Company signed an exclusive License Agreement with Ms. Jacqueline Young (the “Young Agreement”) for the intellectual property developed by Dr. Bernard Bihari relating to treatments with opioid antagonists such as naltrexone and Met-enkephalin for a variety of diseases and conditions including malignant lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, chronic herpes virus infections, chronic herpes viral infections such as chronic genital herpes caused by the herpes simplex virus Type 2 and chronic infections due to the Epstein-Barr virus and a treatment method for humans infected with HTLV-III (AIDS) virus, including patients clinically diagnosed as suffering from AIDS and those suffering from AIDS-related complex (ARC). The Bihari patents were acquired in exchange for 540,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair value of $972,000 and assumed liabilities of $400,000, which was payable to Ms. Young over a twenty-four month period in equal installments to reimburse her for the costs of a New York City office in accordance with the Young Agreement. The cost of the patent totaled $1,372,000. Additionally, the Company will pay the licensor a royalty payment of 1% of gross sales. Due to the fact that there have been no sales of licensed product to date, the Company has been required, since the beginning of 2015, to make a minimum royalty payment of $100,000 annually to the licensor. The Young Agreement is valid for the life of the patents and expires on a country by country basis in each country where patent rights exist, upon the expiration of the last to expire patent in each country or in the event the patent in such country is held to be invalid and/or unenforceable (by a court or government body of competent jurisdiction) or admitted to be invalid or unenforceable. Additionally, the Company can cancel the Young Agreement upon 120 days’ written notice and shall pay all royalties and fees that have accrued under the Young Agreement. We have the exclusive rights to the intellectual property; however, Ms. Young retains a right to practice the patents licensed under the Young Agreement solely for noncommercial, academic research purposes.
On December 24, 2012, the Company signed an agreement for the acquisition of patent rights (the “Smith Agreement”) for the intellectual property of Dr. Jill Smith and LDN Research Group, LLC (collectively, the “Licensor Parties”), whose members are Dr. Ian S. Zagon, Dr. Patricia J. McLaughlin and Moshe Rogosnitzky and orphan drug designation by the FDA to a novel late-stage drug, trademarked “LDN,” for the treatment of Pediatric Crohn’s disease. The patent covers methods and formulations for treatment of the inflammatory and ulcerative diseases of the bowel, using naltrexone in low doses as an opioid antagonist. These patents were acquired in exchange for 300,000 shares of our common stock with a fair value of $2,715,000 and payment of $165,384 (consisting of a $100,000 initial license fee and payment of $65,384 of expenses), which totaled $2,880,384.
The Smith Agreement requires the Company to (i) use commercially reasonable efforts to develop, commercialize, market and sell licensed products in a manner consistent with a business plan, (ii) expend a minimum amount of funds per annum to develop and commercialize licensed products as soon as practicable, (iii) obtain all requisite regulatory approvals needed to use or sell licensed products in the field of use, and (iv) make the first commercial sale of a licensed product by March of 2017. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had not made a commercial sale of licensed product. Under the Smith Agreement, if the licensors determine that the Company has not fulfilled its obligations, they may furnish the Company with written notice of such determination, in which case the Company must either fulfill the obligation or negotiate a mutually acceptable revised commitment. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, the licensors had not provided any such notice of determination under the agreement.
21 |
The Company is required to pay an annual license fee, an annual running royalty on net sales of each licensed product or a minimum royalty, whichever is greater, and a sublicense fee on payments received by the Company from sublicensees. The Company has an exclusive, worldwide license to make, have made, use, lease, import, offer for sale and sell licensed products and to use the method under the patent rights. The Smith Agreement will terminate on the expiration or abandonment of the last patent to expire or ten years after the sale of the first licensed product. The Company may terminate the Smith Agreement upon 90 days’ written notice, provided all sublicenses are terminated and all amounts due and owing are paid to the Licensor Parties. The Licensor Parties may terminate the agreement ten days’ after notice to the Company if the Company is ten days late in payment or there is a breach that remains uncured for ten days after written notice of such breach.
The Company is also required to pay milestone payments after substantial achievement of certain milestone events for each licensed product including payment: upon initiation of each Phase III trial; upon positive completion of each Phase III clinical trial of the therapeutic use of an LDN compound in the field of use; when a New Drug Application (“NDA”) is accepted for review by the FDA; and when FDA approval to market the NDA is approved. The Company will issue shares upon reaching certain milestones including upon the first dosing of the first patient in a Phase III clinical trial for each licensed product, upon the first sale of each licensed product, and upon the achievement of a set dollar amount in cumulative sales for each licensed product covered by NDAs.
As part of the Smith Agreement, the Company has the right to apply to the FDA for the transfer of the orphan drug status for the use of naltrexone for the treatment of pediatric Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, the Investigation New Drug Application (“IND”), and the right to acquire the relevant clinical data set from Dr. Jill Smith. Dr. Jill Smith made arrangements to transfer the IND to the Company as well as the relevant clinical data set, and the FDA has acknowledged that the Company is now the sponsor for this IND.
On September 24, 2014, the Company and the Licensor Parties jointly agreed to terminate the Smith Agreement, and in place thereof, have the Licensor Parties grant a similar license in their patent rights to Cytocom Inc. pursuant to a Patent License Agreement between the Licensor Parties, Cytocom Inc. and the Company with substantially similar terms as set forth in the Smith Agreement. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock valued at $270,000, upon execution to the Licensor Parties and the Company guaranteed the obligations of Cytocom Inc. to the Licensor Parties under the agreement.
On January 18, 2013, the Company signed an exclusive licensing agreement with The Penn State Research Foundation to license all of the intellectual property developed by Dr. Ian S. Zagon, Dr. Patricia J. McLaughlin and Dr. Jill P. Smith for the treatment of cancer titled “Opioid Growth Factor and Cancer” and “Combination Therapy with Opioid Growth Factor and Taxanes for the Treatment of Cancer” (the “Foundation Agreement”).
The Foundation Agreement requires the Company to: (a) use commercially reasonable efforts to develop, commercialize, market and sell licensed products in a manner consistent with a business plan; (b) expend a minimum amount of funds per annum to develop and commercialize licensed products as soon as practicable; (c) obtain all requisite regulatory approvals needed to use or sell licensed products in the field of use; and (d) make the first commercial sale of a licensed product by December 31, 2016. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had not made a commercial sale of licensed product. Under the Foundation Agreement, if the licensor determines that the Company has not fulfilled its obligations, it may furnish the Company with written notice of such determination, in which case the Company must either fulfill the obligation or negotiate a mutually acceptable revised commitment. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, the licensor had not provided any such notice of determination under the agreement.
The Foundation Agreement provides that the Company must pay to the licensor an initial license fee, a license maintenance fee on each anniversary of the effective date of the Foundation Agreement, and an annual running royalty on net sales for each licensed product or a minimum royalty, whichever is greater. In addition, the Company must pay a sublicense fee on payments received by the Company from sublicensees.
The Foundation Agreement also requires the Company to make payments upon the achievement of certain milestone events including: initiation of each Phase II trial; initiation of each Phase III trial; when the NDA is accepted for review by the FDA; and when FDA approval to market is approved. The Company must also issue shares upon certain milestones including upon the first dosing of the first patient in a Phase II clinical trial for each licensed product, upon the first dosing of the first patient in a Phase III clinical trial for each licensed product, upon the first sale of each licensed product, and upon the achievement of a set dollar amount of cumulative sales for each licensed product covered by NDAs.
22 |
The Foundation Agreement terminates on the expiration or abandonment of the last patent to expire or become abandoned. The Company may terminate the Foundation Agreement at any time upon 60 days’ prior written notice and ceasing to make and sell all licensed products, the termination of all sublicenses and payment of all monies owed under the Foundation Agreement. The licensor may terminate the agreement 30 days after notice to the Company if the Company is 30 days late in payment or a breach that remains uncured for 45 days after written notice of such breach.
In May of 2013, the Company executed a Patent License Agreement with Professor Fengping Shan (the “Shan Agreement”) pursuant to which it obtained exclusive rights to develop and commercialize the licensed technology. The licensed technology is the intellectual property developed and owned by Professor Shan (i) relating to the treatment of a variety of diseases and conditions with MENK including multiple forms of lymphoma and cancer and (ii) a treatment method for humans infected with the HLTV-III (AIDS) virus including AIDS and AIDS related complex (ARC). The licensed technology includes the methods and formulations for these treatments including all INDs, communications with regulatory agencies, patient data, and letters relating to these treatments. The licensed technology also includes certain patents developed by Professor Shan. Under the Shan Agreement, the Company must issue 500,000 shares to Professor Shan upon final transfer of the licenses, and reimburse Professor Shan for all out of pocket expenses in connection with the patents. The Company will pay Professor Shan a running royalty on gross sales subject to decreases if third party intellectual property is needed to complete such sale or product. The Shan Agreement lasts for the duration of each of the licensed patents however the Company may terminate the Shan Agreement on 120 days’ written notice to Professor Shan.
On August 6, 2014, Professor Fengping Shan executed an Assignment pursuant to which he transferred to the Company his entire right, title and interest in and to the licensed patents under the Shan Agreement and CN 201210302259 Application of combination of low-dose naltrexone and methionine-enkephalin to preparation of anti-cancer drug for the consideration of 500,000 shares of common stock valued at $140,000.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Malawi Treatment Facilities
On July 14, 2012, GB Oncology and Imaging Group LTD (“GBOIG”) in partnership with the Company signed a letter of intent agreement to collaborate with the Government of Malawi to assist in expanding the treatment of cancer, HIV/AIDS and other infectious diseases.
In December of 2014, the Government of Malawi completed an oncology clinic at the Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Blantyre, Malawi for the treatment of cancer and infectious diseases. In 2015, the Company submitted protocols seeking permission from the College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee of Malawi (“COMREC”) to conduct two trials involving Lodonal™ in Malawi:
a. | The first protocol, submitted jointly with The Jack Brewer Foundation (“JBF Worldwide”), received COMREC approval on November 11, 2015. The protocol covers a 12-month trial for a “Single Visit Approach to Cervical Cancer Prevention.” The approach is designed to deliver a preventive and simple procedure that can be performed in a clinical setting without the use of a laboratory and to allow for immediate treatment of any precancerous lesions utilizing Wallach LL100 Cryosurgical systems. The protocol provides for 50% of the patient group to be put on Lodonal™ to determine if the drug lowers the number of opportunistic infections during the year, and if it can be shown that Lodonal™ increases CD4, CE8, NK and T cell count, which would show that the incidence rates of opportunistic infection could decrease with Lodonal™ and that Lodonal™ could be used as a prophylaxis to prevent substantial HIV-related morbidity in Malawi. COMREC approved the trial in late 2016. Enrollment of study subjects began in late 2016, and the study commenced in January 2017. Due to the fact that enrollment to date in the study has been low, we now expect to reach the target sample size only by the end of 2017. The trial is ongoing with subjects recruited so far, but it cannot be completed until an acceptable sample subject size is reached. |
b. | The second protocol, which has not yet been approved, covers a trial using Lodonal™ for the treatment of cancer. The Company has put this trial on hold as it may not be required now that the Company has received approval in Nigeria for in addition to the pending approval in Kenya and Senegal for Lodonal™ for the treatment of cancer. |
23 |
Distribution Agreements in Nigeria
Effective November 9, 2012, the Company signed an exclusive Distribution Agreement with G-Ex Technologies/St. Maris Pharma and GB Pharma Holdings, LLC for the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The parties have been unable to perform under the agreement because a certificate of free sale was not obtained by the Company until November of 2013, and no extension has been granted.
In October 2013, the Company announced the signing of a Distribution Agreement with AHAR Pharma, a Nigerian company, to market Lodonal™, in Nigeria for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and cancer. AHAR intends to distribute Lodonal™ through a local distributor network, an Internet client base and directly to hospitals, pharmacists and doctors in Nigeria. The agreement expires in December 2018. Under the agreement, the Company is obligated to provide delivery of an initial supply of between 1 million and 1.5 million doses of Lodonal™ product to cover AHAR Pharma’s first-year purchase commitment.
In August 2015, the Company announced the signing of a letter of intent with GB Pharma/AHAR and Fidson Healthcare Plc., in terms of which Fidson will promote LodonalTM upon execution of a definitive agreement between the companies and receipt required regulatory approvals to distribute LodonalTM in Nigeria. The Company continues to hold discussions with Fidson for distribution of LodonalTM in Nigeria under this letter of intent.
In May 2017, the Company received approval from the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control of Nigeria (“NAFDAC”) to market and distribute LodonalTM in Nigeria. The approval is for a one-day Immune System Regulator for the management of HIV/AIDS, which is based on the results of the Company’s 90-day bridging trial in Nigeria.
Under the 2013 distribution agreement with AHAR Pharma, after the Company received NAFDAC approval to sell LodonalTM in Nigeria, AHAR was required to place an initial order for capsules totaling between 1 million and 1.5 million capsules, at $1.00 per capsule. No order was placed. The parties have agreed to amend their agreement in this regard, and they expect to close negotiations by the end of November 2017. The Company expects to ship an initial order of 400,000 capsules, commencing before year-end 2017, over a 12-month period in equal quarterly instalments. AHAR has notified the Company that it has opened discussions with a small number of wholesalers for the purchase of LodonalTM.
In September 2017, the Company became registered under the U.S. Government's System for Award Management to sell LodonalTM to Nigeria through the United States Agency for International Development (“USAID”) and UNAIDS. At the same time, the Company and AHAR filed for regulatory approval of the use of LodonalTM with the National Agency for the Control of AIDS in Nigeria (“NACA”). Once NACA approves the use of LodonalTM as a treatment for AIDS, it will be able to purchase LodonalTM directly from the Company and AHAR.
In addition to the work with NACA, USAID and UNAIDS, AHAR and the Company are moving forward with applications to NAFDAC to permit the sale of Lodonal™ in Nigeria for additional indications. They expect to submit those applications in the first quarter of 2018. Those indications include the use of the drug as an adjunct to treatment of chemotherapy, opportunistic infections and cancer.
Agreements in Kenya
In March 2017, the Company signed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) for distribution of Lodonal™ in Kenya. The MOU is a three-way distribution agreement between the Company, Kenya-based Omaera Pharmaceuticals Limited, a leading Kenyan pharmaceutical importer and distributor, and GB Pharma Holdings. The MOU sets forth standard terms and conditions for distributing Lodonal™ in Kenya.
24 |
In April 2017, the Company submitted a New Drug Application (“NDA”) to the Pharmacy and Poison Board (“PPB”) in Kenya for LodonalTM for the treatment of patients with HIV and cancer, both as a standalone treatment as well as an adjunct treatment, and as an immunomodulator.
On August 22, 2017, the Company entered into a Distribution Agreement (the “Agreement”) with TNI BioTech International Ltd. (“TNI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, and Omaera Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (“Omaera”). Pursuant to the Agreement, Omaera will be the sole distributor of the Company’s Products, as listed in Section 2 of the Agreement, for sale in Kenya. The Products to be distributed by Omaera will be manufactured by Acromax Dominicana, SA. The term of the Agreement began on August 22, 2017 and are to continue for a period of three (3) years, unless earlier terminated.
The Company will have up to 14 calendar days from receipt of a purchase order from Omaera to deliver the requested Products to Omaera. During the first 12 months of the Agreement, Omaera will pay the full amount of each invoice in cash, without any deductions, by means of bank transfer on or before the date of shipment. After the first 12 months of the Agreement, the Company will provide 30 days credit terms from the date of invoice for payment. The Company has the right to vary the credit made available to Omaera, and to restrict supplies, if Omaera fails to make payments in accordance the Agreement.
Pursuant to the Agreement, Omaera is required to purchase a minimum number of pills from the Company for specified periods over the term of the Agreement (the “Minimum Purchase Commitment”). The minimum number of pills required to be purchased by Omaera for each period are as follows:
● | First half of first year 1,080,000 pills | |
● | Second half of first year 3,600,000 pills | |
● | Second year 14,400,000 pills | |
● | Third year 28,800,000 pills |
If the number of Products purchased by Omaera from the Company does not, in the three-year term beginning on August 22, 2017, or in any of the above-captioned periods, meet the Minimum Purchase Commitment, Omaera shall, at its option, either (a) buy the quantity of Product required to meet that period’s Minimum Purchase Commitment, or (b) pay to the Company the net profit that patent laboratories would have obtained from the sale of that Minimum Purchase Commitment of Product, at the rate specified in Schedule 1 of the Agreement, or a higher rate if to the extent that the Company may have increased the price per pill.
Omaera is required to purchase the Products only from the Company and use its best endeavors to actively distribute and sell the Products in Kenya. To this end, Omaera must recruit a sales and promotion team responsible for meeting the agreed business plan and utilize its marketing personnel to promote selling, distributing and all marketing process of the Company’s Products throughout Kenya. No later than three months from the date of the Agreement, Omaera is required to purchase and hold a minimum of three months stock of the Products on a firm purchase basis throughout the term of the Agreement to meet anticipated market demand.
Upon termination of the Agreement for any reason, Omaera will immediately and at no charge assign or transfer the benefit of the Product Registrations or Registration applications and all associated rights and any other permits, licenses, registrations or applications obtained in respect of the Agreement or the Products to the Company where legally possible, or to another party as the Company in its sole discretion may direct and the parties shall cooperate in every way to achieve such assignment or transfer including without limitation providing all documents related with the Product registrations within three (3) months of the request.
The Company continues to await receipt of final regulatory approvals from Kenya’s National AIDS & STI Control Programme (“NASCOP”) to commence distribution of LodonalTM in Kenya. No purchase orders have been received by the Company from Omaera under the Agreement.
25 |
Agreements with Hubei Qianjiang Pharmaceutical Company
On October 18, 2012, the Company and Hubei Qianjiang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (“Qianjiang Pharmaceutical”), signed a Venture Cooperation Agreement on New Drug Methionine Enkephalin (the “Venture Agreement”) pursuant to which Qianjiang Pharmaceutical acquired an exclusive license for the production of MENK in China. The Venture Agreement requires that Qianjiang Pharmaceutical conduct drug research and pilot testing for MENK, organize pre-clinical studies, and apply for clinical trials for MENK with the Chinese State Food and Drug Administration. Under the Venture Agreement, Qianjiang Pharmaceutical must open a co-administration account for the development of MENK in China. Qianjiang Pharmaceutical must pay the Company, upon the marketing of MENK products, a half-year amount equaling 6% of its gross sales from MENK of the preceding half year. The Company may cancel the Venture Agreement if Qianjiang Pharmaceutical does not pay expenses for a period exceeding six months or does not commence clinical trials within 12-months after receiving certain approvals. Qianjiang Pharmaceutical may cancel the Venture Agreement if the Company fails to perform its obligations for a period of six months or the failure to receive approval of clinical trials is due to the Company’s MENK technologies. The Venture Agreement was amended on February 24, 2013 to expand the clinical trials from pancreatic to both pancreatic and liver cancer and amended on March 6, 2014 to require Qianjiang Pharmaceutical to commence studies and clinical trials in China and place funds in the co-administration account.
On August 6, 2014, the Company entered into a Supplementary Agreement on New Drug Methionine – Enkephalin Cooperation (the “Amendment”) with Qianjiang Pharmaceutical, amending the Venture Agreement, as amended. The Company and Qianjiang Pharmaceutical executed the Amendment to accelerate clinical trials in both the United States and China, and agreed to immediately initiate three month Good Laboratory Practice (“GLP”) Toxicology Studies (rat and dog) within 30 days of signing the Amendment. The Amendment requires that the GLP Toxicology Studies Trials are conducted in China in accordance with international standards and standards acceptable to the FDA and that the studies include the following:
Exploratory Toxicology (nGLP)
● | Dose range finding studies | |
● | Different species and methods of administration | |
● | Multiple dosing regimens | |
● | Estimate the response vs. dose given |
Definitive Toxicology (GLP)
● | Performed in collaboration with Calvert Laboratories (USA) and MPI/Medicillon (China) | |
● | General toxicology studies | |
● | Different species and methods of administration | |
● | Immunogenicity study with NHPs |
Special Toxicology Studies (planned)
Pursuant to the Amendment, Qianjiang Pharmaceutical has made certain funds available from the co-administrative account opened by Qianjiang Pharmaceutical under the Venture Agreement, in accordance with an approved budget and timeline set forth in the Amendment. A portion of these funds are expected to be used by Cytocom to run PK and Dosing trials for MENK in the United States in 2016. The Amendment requires Cytocom and Qianjiang Pharmaceutical to meet with the China State Food and Drug Administration to determine that PK and Dosing Trials completed in the United States will be acceptable. All developments and trials run by Cytocom in the U.S. or the European Union will be used for requesting registration approval in China.
In February 2013, the Company signed a Strategic Framework Agreement for Cooperation with Qianjiang Pharmaceutical. Under the agreement, the parties will work together to further the development of new products and conduct research and development on the Company’s licensed patented technology. Specifically, the parties aim to co-invest to develop and market products focusing on HIV, cancer and related autoimmune system therapies, develop co-ventured manufacturing facilities in China, and develop co-ventured distribution of the developed products in China and Africa. The agreement does not have a definitive term, as each new agreement resulting from the cooperation will set forth the material terms, including, but not limited to, fees, duration and termination therein.
26 |
In December of 2016 Qianjiang Pharmaceutical completed the following documents:
Exploratory Toxicology (nGLP)
● | Dose range finding studies | |
● | Different species and methods of administration | |
● | Multiple dosing regimens | |
● | Estimate the response vs. dose given |
Definitive Toxicology (GLP)
● | Performed in collaboration with Calvert Laboratories (USA) and MPI/Medicillon (China) | |
● | General toxicology studies | |
● | Different species and methods of administration | |
● | Immunogenicity study with NHPs |
In addition to the pharmacology and toxicology studies, Qianjiang Pharmaceutical and China Peptide completed the formulation and CMC necessary to scale up manufacturing of MENK.
Contract Manufacturing Agreements
On May 16, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Complete Pharmacy and Medical Solutions, LLC (“CPMS”) to compound, package and distribute the LDN tablets, capsules and/or creams in the United States. The initial term of the agreement is three years, with the option to renew for an additional year. The agreement may be terminated by (i) mutual agreement, (ii) in the event of a breach, provided however that if the Company terminates the agreement, the Company will be required to reimburse CPMS for all unused packaging materials for the LDN, which unused packaging materials CPMS will provide to IMUN. If CPMS does not receive and ship at least 1,000 orders (prescriptions) during the term of the agreement, the Company will be required to reimburse CPMS for 100% of the “ramp up costs” (defined as all costs and expenses of labor and materials related to the testing, and required FDA and other governmental documentation/approvals of test data) of providing and producing the LDN, even where the Company cancels/terminates the agreement, which provision shall survive the cancellation/termination of the agreement.
On October 25, 2016, the Company and Acromax Dominicana, SA (“Acromax”) entered into a contract for manufacturing of LDN tablets, capsules and/or creams (“Agreement”). In accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement, Acromax will obtain all necessary licenses and permits to carry out the manufacturing and packaging of LDN in exchange for a fixed fee per tablet plus an additional fee for packaging, shipping and customs clearance. The Agreement has an initial term of five years unless terminated by either party in accordance with its terms.
In January 2017, Acromax obtained from the Ministry of Public Health and Social Assistance a Medications and Specialized Pharmaceuticals Registration Certification for LodonalTM, which allows for the manufacture and sale of LodonalTM in the Dominican Republic and for export. The Ministry also issued a Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product for Nigeria, Kenya, Senegal and Malawi, which will allow for the export of LodonalTM to those countries where the Company has drug and marketing approval.
Operating Leases
At September 30, 2017, the Company was a party to an agreement to lease office space in Orlando, Florida. Rent expense for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $12,632 and $4,009, respectively. Rent expense in 2016 reflected a $34,982 reversal of an accrual.
Legal Proceedings
None.
27 |
12. Subsequent Events
Settlement Agreement
On October 12, 2017, the Company entered into a settlement and release agreement (the “Release Agreement”) with Phoenix Fund Management, LLC (“PFM”) and Far East Holdings, LLC (“FEH”) relating to certain claims between the Company and PFM before the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit (the “Court”), in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, case No. 2017-003521 CA-01 (the “Lawsuit”). The debt to PFM, the Lawsuit, a previous settlement agreement between PFM and the Company (“3(a)(10) Settlement Agreement”) and the Court’s previous order that the Company pay PFM in the amount of $675,000 through issuance of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the 3(a)(10) Settlement Agreement, was initially disclosed in the Company’s current report filed March 14, 2017.
The Release Agreement memorializes that the $675,000 due PFM has been overpaid by the Company and establishes the responsibilities of the parties henceforth. Pursuant to the Release Agreement, the Company agreed to dismiss all claims filed against PFM, not attempt to impede or frustrate the ability of PFM to deposit, clear or sell its shares of the Company’s stock, and provide any assistance necessary to aid in the deposit and clearance of PFM’s shares. Also pursuant to the Release Agreement, PFM is required to transfer one million (1,000,000) shares of the Company’s stock to ClearTrust, LLC, the Company’s transfer agent (“ClearTrust”), for the shares to be deposited in the Company’s treasury and FEH shall transfer one and half million (1,500,000) shares of the Company’s stock to ClearTrust for the shares to be deposited in the Company’s treasury. Upon the terms and conditions of the Release Agreement being met, each party has agreed to fully release the other party from any claims or complaints, known or unknown, which the party may have had against the other.
Securities Purchase and Related Documents
On October 25, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Iliad Research and Trading, L.P., a Utah limited partnership (“Iliad”) whereby the Company agreed to sell and Iliad agreed to purchase the following securities (“Securities”) (i) a convertible promissory note (the “Note”) convertible into common shares of the Company, (ii) a warrant exercisable into 2,656,250 common shares of the Company (the “Warrant”), and (iii) 560,000 newly issued common shares of the Company (the “Origination Shares”). The purchase price for the Securities is $350,000.
Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company has agreed to initially reserve 45,000,000 common shares towards issuance of the common shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant and conversion of the Note. It has further agreed to increase the reserve in 5,000,000 share increments so that the reserve remains at least 3x the number of common shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant and conversion of the Note. The Company and its transfer agent have executed an irrevocable letter of instruction relating to the reservation of shares pursuant to the Agreement.
In addition, should the Company offer securities during any period while the Securities are outstanding on better terms than those offered to Iliad pursuant to the Agreement, Iliad or its assign shall have the option to incorporate the preferable terms conversion or exercise of it remaining outstanding Securities. Further, the Agreement contains numerous restrictive covenants relating to, among others, the Company’s issuance of variable rate securities. The Agreement also contains standard representations and warranties.
28 |
The Warrant issued pursuant to the Agreement on or around October 25, 2017, may be exercised for a term of five (5) years for a total of up to 2,656,250 shares. The exercise price for each share of common stock under the Warrant is $0.08, as the same may be adjusted from time to time pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Warrant, including following a stock split or dividend. The Warrant holder may elect a “cashless” exercise of the Warrant whereby the holder shall be entitled to receive a number of shares of common stock equal to (i) the excess of the “Current Market Value” (as defined in the Warrant) over the aggregate exercise price of the shares being exercised, divided by (ii) the “Adjusted Price” (the lower of the market price and exercise price, as adjusted).
The Company has three days from the date of any exercise of the Warrant to deliver the warrant shares before it incurs substantial late fees not to exceed 200% of the value of the warrant shares being exercised. The Warrant contains a 4.99% ownership limitation whereby the Warrant cannot be exercised if it would cause the holder’s ownership to exceed 4.99% of the Company’s voting stock. This limitation may be increased by the holder to 9.99%.
The Company issued the Note on or around October 25, 2017 in the principal amount of $425,000. In addition to containing a $70,000 original issuance discount (OID), the Note included $5,000 to cover Iliad’s legal expenses relating to the foregoing transactions. No interest will accrue on the principal balance of the Note unless there is a default, at which time, it will be 22%. The Note has a seven (7) month maturity but may be prepaid in full anytime; however, if prepaid within 90 days from issuance, the Company will be required to pay only $400,000 in full satisfaction of the Note.
The Note holder may convert the principal and interest under the Note to common shares of the Company at a conversion rate of, subject to adjustment, 60% of the lowest intra-day trade price during the period twenty five (25) trading days prior to conversion. The conversion price may be reduced by factors of 5% upon certain events of default.
Upon any enumerated event of default under the Note, the Note holder may declare all amounts under the Note immediately due and payable at a premium based on a formula using the conversion price, outstanding balance and market price of the Company’s common stock. In the alternative, the Note holder may apply a default premium rather than declaring the balance due. In such case the outstanding balance will be increased by the default premium, which is 5% for minor defaults and 15% for major defaults. The premium for major defaults may be applied three times, as may the premium for minor defaults. The Note also contains similar ownership limitations and late fees for failure to timely deliver share certificates as those contained in the Warrant.
The Company issued 26,391,765 shares of common stock between September 30, 2017 and November 14, 2017, of which 5,337,748 shares were for a cashless exercise of a warrant, 3,194,017 shares were for debt conversions and settlements, 4,800,000 shares were for a legal settlement,560,000 shares for a loan origination fee and 12,500,000 shares for cash.
Between October 1, 2017 and November 14, 2017, the company received $475,000 in debt financing.
As of November 14, 2017, the Company had outstanding 383,532,473 shares of common stock.
29 |
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
Forward-Looking Statements and Associated Risks
This section and other parts of this Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Forward-looking statements also can be identified by words such as “future,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “can,” “may,” and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and the Company’s actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2016 (the “2015 Form 10-K/A”) under the heading “Risk Factors”.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the 2015 Form 10-K/A and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. All information presented herein is based on the Company’s fiscal calendar. Unless otherwise stated, references in this report to particular years, quarters, months or periods refer to the Company’s fiscal years ended in December and the associated quarters, months, or periods of those fiscal years. Each of the terms the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” as used herein refers collectively to Immune Therapeutics, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise stated. The Company assumes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.
General
Immune Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) was initially incorporated in Florida on December 2, 1993 as Resort Clubs International, Inc. (“Resort Clubs”). It was formed to manage and market golf course properties in resort markets throughout the United States. Galliano International Ltd. (“Galliano”) was incorporated in Delaware on May 27, 1998 and began trading in November 1999 through the filing of a 15C-211. On November 10, 2004, Galliano merged with Resort Clubs. Resort Clubs was the surviving corporation. On August 23, 2010, Resort Clubs changed its name to pH Environmental Inc. (“pH Environmental”).
On April 23, 2012, pH Environmental completed a name change to TNI BioTech, Inc., and on April 24, 2012, we executed a share exchange agreement for the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of TNI BioTech IP, Inc. On September 4, 2014, a majority of our shareholders approved an amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, to change our name to Immune Therapeutics, Inc. We filed our name change amendment with the Secretary of State of Florida on October 27, 2014 changing our name to Immune Therapeutics, Inc.
The Company currently operates out of Orlando, Florida. In July 2012, the Company’s focus turned to acquiring patents that would protect and advance the development of new uses of opioid-related immune- therapies, such as low dose naltrexone (“LDN”) and Methionine [Met5]-enkephalin (“MENK”). The Company’s therapies are believed to stimulate and/or regulate the immune system in such a way that they provide the potential to treat a variety of diseases. We believe our therapies may be able to correct abnormalities or deficiencies in the immune system in diseases such as HIV infection, autoimmune disease, immune disorders, or cancer; all of which can lead to disease progression and life-threatening situations when the immune system is not functioning optimally.
In October 2012, the Company formed TNI BioTech International, Ltd., a BVI company in Tortola, British Virgin Islands, which was set up to allow the Company to market and sell LDN in those countries outside the U.S. in which we have been able to obtain approval to sell the Company’s products.
In August 2013, the Company formed its United Kingdom subsidiary, TNI BioTech, LTD (the “UK Subsidiary”). The UK Subsidiary received approval to be considered a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise (“SME”) with the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) on August 21, 2013. The designation provides the UK Subsidiary with significant discounts when holding meetings or submitting filings to the EMA. On September 19, 2013, the UK Subsidiary submitted a pre-submission package to the EMA regarding Crohn’s Disease. The EMA granted the UK Subsidiary a meeting that took place on September 27, 2013. The UK Subsidiary is eligible to benefit from the provisions for administrative and financial assistance for SMEs set out in Regulation (EC) No 2049/2005. The Company will apply to obtain EMA benefits once funding becomes available.
30 |
2013, the Company formed a new subsidiary, Cytocom Inc., to focus on conducting LDN and MENK clinical trials in the United States. In December 2014, the Company finalized the distribution of common stock of Cytocom Inc. to its shareholders. As part of the transaction, the Company retained exclusive rights to all international patents, in-country approvals, formulations, trademarks, manufacturing, marketing, sales, and distributions rights in emerging nations, including Africa, Central America, South America, Russia, India, China, Far East, and The Commonwealth of Independent States (former Soviet Union). The Company will continue to have access to existing clinical data as well as any new data generated by Cytocom Inc. during drug development. On December 8, 2014, the number of Cytocom Inc. shares of common stock that were issued to our shareholders totaled 113,242,522 shares. In connection with the transaction, Cytocom Inc. issued 140,100,000 shares of its common stock to the Company, which gave the Company a 55.3% stake in Cytocom Inc. on that date. In April 2016, the Board of Directors and a majority of shareholders of Cytocom approved a reverse stock split of Cytocom’s outstanding common stock with one new share of stock for each twenty old shares of common stock. Cytocom effectuated and finalized the reverse split in June 2016. At June 30, 2017, the Company’s equity interest had been further reduced to 11.3%, by subsequent issuances of Cytocom common stock to shareholders in settlement of notes payable.
In March 2014, the Company incorporated Airmed Biopharma Limited, an Irish corporation with an address in Dublin, Ireland, and Airmed Holdings Limited, an Irish company domiciled in Bermuda. The Irish companies were set up to benefit from incentives granted by the Irish government for the establishment of pharmaceutical companies (many of the world’s leading pharmaceutical companies have located in Ireland), and so that the Company could take advantage of Ireland’s status as a member of the European Union and the European Economic Area. An Irish limited liability company enjoys a low corporate income tax rate of 12.5%, one of the lowest in the world. The Irish-domiciled company hopes to qualify for tax incentives for Irish holding/headquartered companies and to benefit from the network of double tax treaties that reduce withholding taxes. TNI BioTech International, Ltd. will manage our international distribution, using product that is manufactured in Ireland and elsewhere.
Today, Immune Therapeutics is focused on the commercialization of affordable non-toxic immunotherapies focused on the activation and rebalancing of the body’s immune system. Stimulating the body’s immune system remains one of the most promising approaches in the treatment of Cancers, HIV, Autoimmune Diseases, inflammatory conditions and other opportunistic infections for chronic often life-threatening diseases through the mobilization of the body’s immune system in Emerging Nations using existing clinical data.
Cytocom Inc, is a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company focused on the development of the first affordable non-toxic immunodulator for the treatment of inflammatory diseases, immune-related disorders, and cancer and is responsible for the development of our patented therapies with the FDA and EMA.
As of this date, neither we nor our collaboration partners are permitted to market our drug candidates in the United States until we receive approval of a New Drug Application from the FDA. Neither we nor our collaboration partners have submitted an application for or received marketing approval for any of our drug candidates. Obtaining approval of an NDA can be a lengthy, expensive and uncertain process.
Research and Development
The Company’s research and development (“R&D”) activities commenced in the third quarter of 2012, the Company having completed the initial acquisition of MENK-related patents required for research in the second quarter of that year. Through 2013 and the first nine months of 2014, we continued to build R&D organization and capabilities focusing primarily on new uses for opioid-related immuno-therapies, such as LDN and MENK. Those activities were suspended at the end of September 2014, due to lack of funding. We expect to be able to resume activities in 2017.
Our R&D priorities include development of IRT-101 or MENK, a small synthetic peptide that is naturally occurring in the body, and IRT-103 LDN, an opioid receptor antagonist. Our pipeline provides two therapies with a wide range of indications that can be pursued. We believe that both molecules have the ability to stimulate the immune system in order to treat a variety of autoimmune diseases including multiple sclerosis, immune disorders such as Crohn’s disease, cancer, and viral infections such as HIV/AIDS.
31 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
Revenues (dollar amounts in thousands)
We had no revenues from operations for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $3 for the three months ended September 30, 2016.
Operating Expenses
Selling, general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses and related percentages for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
For the three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Selling, general and administrative | $ | 621 | $ | 1,031 | ||||
Increase/(decrease) from prior year | $ | (410 | ) | $ | 166 | |||
Percent increase/(decrease) from prior year | (40 | )% | 19 | % |
For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, selling, general and administrative expenses were made up as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
For the three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Stock listing and investor relations expenses | $ | 6 | $ | - | ||||
Consulting and contractors | 119 | 161 | ||||||
Payroll | 333 | 583 | ||||||
Professional fees | 38 | 37 | ||||||
Travel | 33 | 107 | ||||||
Other expenses | 92 | 143 |
In the three months ended September 30, 2017, total cash and cash accruals for selling, general and administrative expense was $621 compared to $1,031 for the corresponding period in 2016, an decrease of $410 or 40%. Significant cash items included:
● | consulting and contractor services obtained to assist the Company in raising capital, manage investor relations, and develop business in new markets, in the amount of $119 in 2017, a decrease of $42 or 26% over the $161 spent in 2016. The decrease reflects reduced spending in 2017 FDA discussions to re-open clinical trials and the manufacture of products in the USA; | |
● | professional fees for legal, tax and accounting services in the amount of $38 in 2017, an increase of $1 or 3% over the $37 spent in 2016. The increase was primarily due to costs incurred in 2016 to settle outstanding debt obligations and litigation; | |
● | payroll in the amount of $333 in 2017, a decrease of $250 or 43% over the $583 spent in 2016. The decrease reflects lower headcount in 2017, and the costs of stock awards to executives and employees in the third quarter of 2016. There were no stock awards in the third quarter of 2017; and | |
● | travel in the amount of $33 in 2017, a decrease of $74 or 69% over the $107 spent in 2016, reflecting lower travel expenses in Africa. |
32 |
Research and development
R&D expenses and related percentages for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
For the three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Research and development | $ | 109 | $ | 247 | ||||
Increase from prior year | $ | (138 | ) | $ | 136 | |||
Percent increase/(decrease) from prior year | (56 | )% | 122 | % |
Expenses for research and development in the three months ended September 30, 2017 decreased by 56% compared to expenses in the same period in 2016. The decrease reflects a reduction in professional fees (decreased by $19 or 43%) and Africa trial and related travel expenses (decreased by $137 or 98%), offset by an increase of $18 or 27% in costs for contracted technical services and patent expenses.
Significant items included:
● | payments for contracted technical services, $37 in 2017, an increase of $11 or 42% over the $26 spent in 2016, reflecting timing of accruals for fees owed for research activities; | |
● | payments for professional fees of $26 in 2017, a decrease of $19 or 42% over the $45 spent in 2016, reflecting a decrease in the cost in maintaining patents and licenses worldwide; | |
● | patent expenses of $46 in 2017, a $7 increase over the $39 spent in 2016, reflecting payments for certain rights to use LDN. |
Most of the R&D spending in the third quarter of 2017 was for LDN. In the same period in 2016, 75% of the spending was for the development of LDN; the balance was spent on MENK.
Stock issued for services
The Company periodically receives services from consultants under long-term consulting contracts, in terms of which it issues stock to prepay for the services. In such cases, the Company initially accounts for the full cost of these services as Prepaid Services on its balance sheet, calculated by the number of shares issued multiplied by the share price on the contract date. This amount is then amortized as a cost over the period in which the services are provided to the Company. The Company reports these costs separately from Selling, general and administrative costs, and Research and development costs, to better demonstrate the true costs of Selling, general and administrative activities, and Research and development.
Amortization of amounts recorded as Prepaid Services for stock issued for services G&A and related percentages for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
For the three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Amortization of prepaid consulting expense G&A | $ | 446 | $ | 1,225 | ||||
Percentage increase/ (decrease) from prior year | (64 | )% | 12 | % |
The decline in expense reflects the decrease in the price of the Company’s stock year over year and the fact that the cost of shares issued for services had been fully amortized in prior years.
The number of shares issued for prepaid consulting services G&A in the three months ending September 30, 2017 was 1,700,000 (5,790,910 in the corresponding period in 2016).
33 |
Prepaid consulting services G&A in the three months ended September 30, 2017 consisted of the following:
Amortization of cost of stock issued prior to 2017 | $ | 125 | ||
Amortization of cost of stock issued in 2017 | $ | 321 |
Warrant valuation expense
When the Company sells its stock for cash or settles debt for stock, it periodically issues warrants to acquire additional stock at prices agreed at the date of the original sale. The Company incurs a cost for the rights attached to the warrants, which is calculated using the Black-Scholes Model (see above 7. Capital Structure—Common Stock and Common Stock Purchase Warrants.) This expense is reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations above as the Warrant valuation expense.
In the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company issued 2,500,000 warrants to stockholders at an exercise price of $0.10, for which it recorded an expense of $273. In the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company issued 2,000,000 warrants to stockholders at an exercise price range of $0.15 to $0.20, for which it recorded an expense of $188.
For the three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Warrant valuation expense | $ | 273 | $ | 188 | ||||
Percentage increase/(decrease) from prior year | 45 | )% | 404 | % |
Depreciation and amortization
The Company amortizes the costs incurred to acquire patents and licenses over the period of the related agreements. All of the Company’s patents and licenses had been fully amortized by December 31, 2016.
Depreciation and amortization expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
For the three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Depreciation expense | $ | - | $ | 1 | ||||
Amortization expense | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Decrease from prior year | $ | 1 | $ | (148 | ) | |||
Percentage increase/(decrease) from prior year | (100 | )% | (99 | )% |
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
For the three months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Interest expense | $ | 119 | $ | 978 | ||||
Decrease from prior year | $ | (859 | ) | $ | 898 | |||
Percentage Decrease from prior year | (88 | )% | 1,124 | % |
The decrease in interest expense reflects the repayment of a note on April 3, 2017 in terms of which penalty interest of $5,000/day was accrued in the quarter ended September 30, 2016.
34 |
Gain or loss on settlement of debt
In three months ended September 30, 2017, certain lenders to the Company settled all or a portion of their notes or accounts payable by converting them to equity. The Company recorded an expense of $32, reflecting the fair value of the shares of common stock issued in exchange for the debt. In three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded an expense of $274, reflecting the fair value of the shares of common stock issued in exchange for the debt.
Nine months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine months Ended September 30, 2016
Revenues (dollar amounts in thousands)
We had no revenues from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $3 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
Operating Expenses
Selling, general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses and related percentages for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
For the nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Selling, general and administrative | $ | 1,843 | $ | 2,864 | ||||
Increase/(decrease) from prior year | $ | (1,021 | ) | $ | 1,175 | |||
Percent increase/(decrease) from prior year | (36 | )% | 70 | % |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, selling, general and administrative expenses were made up as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
For the nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Stock listing and investor relations expenses | $ | 94 | $ | 210 | ||||
Consulting and contractors | 519 | 645 | ||||||
Payroll | 667 | 1,350 | ||||||
Professional fees | 157 | 173 | ||||||
Travel | 102 | 152 | ||||||
Other expenses | 304 | 334 |
In the nine months ended September 30, 2017, total cash and cash accruals for selling, general and administrative expense was $1,843 compared to $2,864 for the corresponding period in 2016, a decrease of $1,021 or 36%. Significant cash items included:
● | consulting and contractor services obtained to assist the Company in raising capital, manage investor relations, and develop business in new markets, in the amount of $519 in 2017, a decrease of $126 or 20% over the $645 spent in 2016. The decrease was the result primarily of the expiration of certain consulting contracts by the end of 2016; | |
● | professional fees for legal, tax and accounting services in the amount of $157 in 2017, a decrease of $16 or 9% over the $173 spent in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in legal fees, reflecting settlement of litigation in 2016, and lower fees paid for audit and tax services in the first nine months of 2017; |
35 |
● | payroll in the amount of $667 in 2017, a decrease of $683 or 51% over the $1,350 spent in 2016. The decrease reflects lower headcount in 2017, lower costs of stock awards to executives and employees in the first half of 2017, $345 in accruals for Cytocom payrolls in 2016 vs. $194 in 2017, and the refund in 2017 of certain payroll taxes paid in the second half of 2016; and | |
● | travel in the amount of $102 in 2017, a decrease of $50 or 33% over the $152 spent in 2016, reflecting reduced travel in both Africa and the USA. |
Research and development
R&D expenses and related percentages for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
For the nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Research and development | $ | 362 | $ | 295 | ||||
Increase from prior year | $ | 67 | $ | (408 | ) | |||
Percent increase/(decrease) from prior year | 23 | % | (58 | )% |
Expenses for research and development in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased by 23% compared to expenses in the same period in 2016. The increase reflects a one-time reversal of accrued expenses ($50) in 2016 for the accrued R&D service expenses, and increased fees in 2017 for work with the FDA on treatment of Crohn’s disease in pediatrics and adults.
Significant items included:
● | expenses for contracted technical services, $119 in 2017, a decrease of $141 or 645% over the (22) spent in 2016, reflecting the settlement of payables related to R&D contracted technical services; |
● | payments for contracted services of $18 in 2017, an increase of $19 or 52% over the $37 spent in 2016, related to meetings with the FDA for resumption of trials by Cytocom; |
● | expenses recorded for patent and license payments totaling $146, an increase of $6 or 4% over the $140 recorded in 2016, reflecting timing of accruals under license agreements; |
● | rent expense of $0 in 2017, an increase of 83 or 100% over the $(83) credit in 2016, reflecting (i) the closure of all R&D offices by the end of 2016 and (ii) the 2016 settlement of a rent dispute with a landlord in Maryland; |
● | payments for professional fees of $69 in 2017, an decrease of $3 or 4% over the $72 spent in 2016, reflecting lower fees incurred to protect patent and intellectual property rights worldwide in 2017; and |
● | Spending on trials of $10 in 2017, a decrease of $135 or 93% over the $145 spent in 2016, reflecting the fact that most of the African trial activity had concluded in 2017. |
Most of the R&D spending in 2017 was for the development of LDN, compared to 75% of spending on LDN in 2016.
Stock issued for services
The Company periodically receives services from consultants under long-term consulting contracts, in terms of which it issues stock to prepay for the services. In such cases, the Company initially accounts for the full cost of these services as Prepaid Services on its balance sheet, calculated by the number of shares issued multiplied by the share price on the contract date. This amount is then amortized as a cost over the period in which the services are provided to the Company. The Company reports these costs separately from Selling, general and administrative costs, and Research and development costs, to better demonstrate the true costs of Selling, general and administrative activities, and Research and development.
36 |
Amortization of amounts recorded as Prepaid Services for stock issued for services G&A and related percentages for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
For the nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Amortization of prepaid consulting expense G&A | $ | 1,537 | $ | 4,404 | ||||
Percentage decrease from prior year | (65 | )% | (12 | )% |
The decline in expense reflects the decrease in the price of the Company’s stock year over year and the fact that the cost of shares issued for services had been fully amortized in prior years.
The number of shares issued for prepaid consulting services G&A in the nine months ending September 30, 2017 was 27,245,460 (29,283,910 in the corresponding period in 2016).
Prepaid consulting services G&A in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 consisted of the following:
Amortization of cost of stock issued prior to 2017 | $ | 534 | ||
Amortization of cost of stock issued in 2017 | 1,003 |
Warrant valuation expense
When the Company sells its stock for cash or settles debt for stock, it periodically issues warrants to acquire additional stock at prices agreed at the date of the original sale. The Company incurs a cost for the rights attached to the warrants, which is calculated using the Black-Scholes Model (see above 6. Capital Structure—Common Stock and Common Stock Purchase Warrants.) This expense is reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations above as the Warrant valuation expense.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company issued 17,750,000 warrants to stockholders at an exercise price range of $0.05 to $0.20, for which it recorded an expense of $318. In the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company issued 25,654,908 warrants to stockholders at an exercise price range of $0..14 to $2.00, for which it recorded an expense of $2,756.
For the nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Warrant valuation expense | $ | 591 | $ | 2,756 | ||||
Percentage increase/(decrease) from prior year | (79 | )% | 7,349 | % |
Depreciation and amortization
The Company amortizes the costs incurred to acquire patents and licenses over the period of the related agreements. All of the Company’s patents and licenses had been fully amortized by December 31, 2016.
Depreciation and amortization expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
For the nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Depreciation expense | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||
Amortization expense | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Decrease from prior year | $ | - | $ | (445 | ) | |||
Percentage increase/(decrease) from prior year | - | % | (99 | )% |
37 |
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
For the nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Interest expense | $ | 823 | $ | 2,331 | ||||
Decrease from prior year | $ | (1,508 | ) | $ | 2,182 | |||
Percentage decrease from prior year | (65 | )% | 1,464 | % |
The decrease in interest expense reflects the repayment of a note on April 3, 2017 in terms of which penalty interest of $5,000/day was accrued in the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
Gain or loss on settlement of debt
In nine months ended September 30, 2017, certain lenders to the Company settled all or a portion of their notes or accounts payable by converting them to equity. The Company recorded a loss of $999, reflecting the fair value of the shares of common stock issued in exchange for the debt. In nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded an expense of $1,979, reflecting the fair value of the shares of common stock issued in exchange for debt.
Liquidity
Liquidity is measured by our ability to secure enough cash to meet our contractual and operating needs as they arise. We do not anticipate generating sufficient net positive cash flows from our operations to fund the next twelve months. We had cash of $22,570 at September 30, 2017, compared to $22,152 at September 30, 2016.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, net cash used in operating activities from operations was $1,615,508 and $2,333,377, respectively.
$1,505 of cash was used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 ($nil in 2016).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 proceeds from the sale of stock and exercise of stock warrants totaled $706,540 compared to $200,000 for the corresponding period in 2016. We also received $1,180,500 from the issuance of notes payable in nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $2,132,380 in 2016. There were $321,846 of loan repayments made in cash in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 ($0 in 2016).
The Company expects to generate revenues from sales in 2017. If the Company is unable to generate sufficient cash flows from sales, or if it does not raise additional working capital to meet all of its operating obligations and expenditures, the Company may have to modify its business plan.
In addition to the cost of its ongoing operations, the Company expects it will incur future research and development expenditures in the next 12 months through Cytocom. Cytocom plans to conduct Phase II and Phase IIB trials for the treatment of Crohn’s disease, at an estimated cost of $3,900,000 and $7,500,000 respectively for each phase. If the trials do not commence before the end of 2017, the Company will be required to make a payment of $100,000 in December 2017 under its license agreements. In prior years, the Company has been able to raise funds through sales of notes payable to cover this obligation, and it expects to do the same if the payment becomes due in December 2017.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we did not engage in any off balance sheet arrangements as defined in item 303(a)(4) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K.
38 |
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not Applicable.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13(a)-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, because of the weakness in internal controls over financial reporting described below, our disclosure controls and procedures are ineffective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017, using the framework set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this assessment, our management concluded that, as of September 30, 2017, the internal controls over financial reporting were not effective. The reportable conditions and material weakness relate to a limited segregation of duties and lack of an audit committee. The limited segregation of duties within our company and the lack of an audit committee are due to the small number of employees. Management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness. This material weakness could result in material misstatements of significant accounts and disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to our interim or annual financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. In addition, due to limited staffing, we are not always able to detect minor errors or omissions in reporting.
Going forward, management anticipates that additional staff will be necessary to mitigate these weaknesses, as well as to implement other planned improvements. Additional staff will enable us to document and apply transactional and periodic controls procedures, permit a better review and approval process and improve quality of financial reporting. However, the potential addition of new staff is contingent on obtaining additional financing, and there is no assurance that we will be able to do so.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls
Readers are cautioned that our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will necessarily prevent all fraud and material error. An internal control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our control have been detected. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any control design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
39 |
The legal proceedings described in Note 11 of the “Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” are incorporated in this “Item 1: Legal Proceedings” by reference.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
In the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company issued a total of 24,450,890 shares of common stock (net of stock cancellations). 2,287,570 of those shares were issued to settle amounts owed under notes payable, including accrued and unpaid interest as applicable, (21,383,687 in 2016). 1,700,000 shares were issued for services provided (5,790,910 in 2016). 20,463,320 shares were issued for cash and the exercise of warrants (0 in 2016).
The following table lists all securities issued during in the three months ended September 30, 2017 without registering the securities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”):
Date | Description | Number | Purchaser | Proceeds | Consideration | Exemption | |||||||||||
8/16/17 | Common Stock Purchase | 250,000 | Consultant | $ | Nil | Advisory Services | Sec. 4(a)(2) | ||||||||||
8/16/17 | Common Stock Purchase | 250,000 | Consultant | $ | Nil | Advisory Services | Sec. 4(a)(2) | ||||||||||
9/15/17 | Common Stock Purchase | 1,200,000 | Consultant | $ | Nil | Advisory Services | Sec. 4(a)(2) | ||||||||||
7/26/17 | Common Stock Purchase | 1,500,000 | Lender | $ | Nil | Debt Settlement | Sec. 4(a)(2) | ||||||||||
7/12/17 | Common Stock Purchase | 787,570 | Lender | $ | Nil | Debt Settlement | Sec. 4(a)(2) | ||||||||||
9/8/17 | Common Stock Purchase | 2,000,000 | Investor | $ | 28,160 | Warrant Exercise | S-1 Registration | ||||||||||
8/29/17 | Common Stock Purchase | 2,015,621 | Investor | $ | 28,379 | Warrant Exercise | S-1 Registration | ||||||||||
9/8/17 | Common Stock Purchase | 2,000,000 | Investor | $ | 50,000 | Stock Purchase Agreement | Sec. 4(a)(2) | ||||||||||
7/13/17 | Common Stock Purchase | 560,617 | Investor | $ | Nil | Cashless Warrant Exercise | Sec. 4(a)(2) | ||||||||||
9/6/17 | Common Stock Purchase | 13,887,082 | Investor | $ | Nil | Cashless Warrant Exercise | Sec. 4(a)(2) |
40 |
The issuances of the Company’s securities were completed in private transactions by the Company not involving any public offering pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) and Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The shares purchased pursuant to the warrant exercises and the shares purchased were issued bearing restrictive legend and may not be resold by the purchasers unless such securities are registered or an exemption from registration is available. The Company determined, based on representations of the investors, that the investors were “accredited investors” as defined under Rule 501(a) of the Securities Act.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
The current portion of notes payable on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets above contains, at September 30, 2017, certain promissory notes on which the Company was in arrears on payments of principal as follows: Rich to update table below
1. | Repayment of a promissory note for $50,000 issued in July 2016. The lender earns interest at a rate of 6% per month. The note is repayable on December 31, 2016. At September 30, 2017, the note was in default, although no demand for repayment has been made by the lender. | |
2. | Payment of principal aggregating $236,000 on certain promissory notes issued between November 26, 2014 and September 30, 2016, to raise up to $2,000,000 in debt, on which lenders earn interest at a rate of 10% per annum, plus a pro-rata share of 2 percent of the Company’s gross receipts for sales of IRT-103-LDN in perpetuity. | |
3. | Payment of principal aggregating $605,494 on certain promissory notes issued between May 1, 2016 and September 30, 2016, and maturing between September 14, 2016 and December 31, 2016. Interest is payable in a fixed amount not tied to a specific interest rate. | |
4. | Repayment of promissory notes for $102,737 issued in November 2016. The lender earns interest at a rate of 10% per annum. The note is repayable on November 3, 2016. At September 30, 2017, the note was in default, although no demand for repayment has been made by the lender. | |
5. | Repayment of a promissory note of $48,000 issued in July 2016. The original amount of the note was for $180,000. On 6/29/17, $66,000 of the principal was converted to stock and on 7/26/17, $66,000 of the principal was converted to stock. At September 30, 2017, the note was in default, although no demand for repayment has been made by the lender. | |
6. | Repayment of promissory notes for $43,209 issued in August 2016. The lender earns interest at a rate of 5% per annum. The notes are payable in 18 equal monthly installments of $8,641. The notes are in default, although no demand for repayment has been made by the lender. | |
7. | Payment of principal aggregating $425,000 on certain promissory notes issued by Cytocom Inc. between April 29, 2015 and December 31, 2015. Lenders earn interest at rates between 5% and 10% per annum. These notes matured on September 30, 2016. At September 30, 2017, the notes were in default, although no demand for repayment has been made by the lenders. |
At September 30, 2017, the Company had insufficient cash on hand to repay these notes.
41 |
Exhibit Number |
Name of Exhibit | |
10.1 | Securities Purchase Agreement and Note with Iliad Research & Trading LP dated October 20, 2017. | |
10.2 | Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement with Phoenix Fund Management, LLC dated October 12, 2017. | |
10.3 | Distribution Agreement with Omaera Pharmaceuticals Ltd. dated August 22, 2017. | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as enacted by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
42 |
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Immune Therapeutics, Inc. | ||
Date: November 14, 2017 | By: | /s/ Noreen Griffin |
Noreen Griffin | ||
Chief Executive Officer | ||
Immune Therapeutics, Inc. | ||
Date: November 14, 2017 | By: | /s/ Peter Aronstam |
Peter Aronstam | ||
Chief Financial Officer |
43 |