BIOTRICITY INC. - Quarter Report: 2016 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

________________

Form 10-Q

Commission file number:  333-201719

BIOTRICITY, INC.

(Name of Registrant in Its Charter)

Nevada	47-2548273
State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
275 Shoreline Drive, Suite 150 Redwood City, California 94065
(Address of principal executive offices)

(416) 214-3678
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [X]  No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).                                                                                                  Yes [X]    No[  ]    

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

  Large accelerated filer  [  ]                Accelerated filer   [  ]

  Non-accelerated filer    [  ]                Smaller reporting company   [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  [  ]     No  [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 16,001,947 shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value at August 15, 2016.

1

BIOTRICITY, INC.

Index

Part I – Financial Information  

2

PART 1

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

3

BIOTRICITY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As at June 30, 2016 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2015 (Audited)

(Expressed in US dollars)

4

BIOTRICITY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 AND 2015 (Unaudited)

(Expressed in US dollars)

5

BIOTRICITY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 AND 2015 (Unaudited)

(Expressed in US dollars)

	Six months ended June 30, 2016	Six months ended June 30, 2015
	$	$
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	(2,313,713)	(2,298,418)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
Stock based compensation	-	1,297,586
Accretion expense	194,103	-
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities	742,227	-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Harmonized sales tax recoverable	12,057	15,625
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	214,851	50,721
Deposits and other receivables	26,117	-
Net cash used in operating activities	(1,124,358)	(934,486)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from exercise of warrants	13,000	470,758
Proceeds from issuance of convertible promissory notes	875,000	-
Due to shareholders	10,929	-
Net cash provided by financing activities	898,929	470,758
Net decrease in cash during the period	(225,429)	(463,728)
Effect of foreign currency translation	(151,274)	51,367
Cash, beginning of period	410,601	448,599
Cash, end of period	33,898	36,238
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated  financial statements

6

BIOTRICITY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 AND 2015 (Unaudited)

(Expressed in US dollars)

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Biotricity, Inc. (formerly MetaSolutions, Inc.) (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on August 29, 2012. 

iMedical Innovations Inc. (“iMedical”) was incorporated on July 3, 2014 under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada.  

 

Both the Company and iMedical are engaged in research and development activities within the remote monitoring segment of preventative care. They are focused on a realizable healthcare business model that has an existing market and commercialization pathway. As such, its efforts to date have been devoted in building technology that enables access to this market through the development of a tangible product.

On February 2, 2016, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with 1061806 BC LTD. (“Callco”), a British Columbia corporation and wholly owned subsidiary (incorporated on February 2, 2016), 1062024 B.C. LTD., a company existing under the laws of the Province of British Columbia (“Exchangeco”), iMedical, and the former shareholders of iMedical (the “Exchange Agreement”), whereby Exchangeco acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of iMedical, taking into account certain shares pursuant to the Exchange Agreement as further explained in Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. These subsidiaries were solely used for the issuance of exchangeable shares in the reverse takeover transaction and have no other transactions or balances.  After giving effect to this transaction, the Company acquired all of iMedical’s assets and liabilities and commenced operations through iMedical.

As a result of the Share Exchange, iMedical is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. This transaction has been accounted for as reverse merger.  Consequently, the assets and liabilities and the historical operations reflected in the consolidated financial statements for the periods prior to February 2, 2016 are those of iMedical and are recorded at the historical cost basis. After February 2, 2016, the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements include the assets and liabilities of both iMedical and the Company and the historical operations of both after that date as one entity.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND MEASUREMENT

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) for interim financial information and the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of SEC Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with Biotricity’s audited financial statements for the four months ended December 31, 2015 and year ended August 31, 2015 and notes thereto included in the Form 10-KT filed with the SEC on April 13, 2016 and iMedical’s audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and notes thereto included in the Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on April 13, 2016. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein.  Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2016, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.  The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31. The Company’s functional currency and reporting currency is the U.S. dollar.

7

3. GOING CONCERN

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred recurring losses from operations and as at June 30, 2016 has an accumulated deficit of $11,542,487. Management anticipates the Company will attain profitable status and improve its liquidity through continued business development and additional debt or equity investment in the Company. Management is pursuing various sources of financing.  

On October 31, 2015, the Company engaged an agent to act as exclusive financial advisor to the Company with respect to assisting the Company in its capital raising efforts as well as assisting the Company in the review of potential financing alternatives available to it and to provide recommendations with respect to the options available to it for meeting its capital needs. Under the engagement agreement, the agent will represent the Company as the sole or lead placement agent, underwriter, book-runner or similar representation in its efforts to obtain financing of up to $12 million in the form of a private placement, public offering, whether in one or a series of transactions, in a private or public offering of equity, convertible debt or equity, equity linked securities or any other securities.  

The Company’s continued existence is dependent upon its ability to continue to execute its operating plan and to obtain additional debt or equity financing. There can be no assurance that the necessary debt or equity financing will be available, or will be available on terms acceptable to the Company, in which case the Company may be unable to meet its obligations. Should the Company be unable to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business, the net realizable value of its assets may be materially less than the amounts recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of recorded asset amounts that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.

4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Areas involving significant estimates and assumptions include: deferred income tax assets and related valuation allowance, accruals and valuation of derivatives, convertible promissory notes and stock options. Actual results could differ from those estimates. These estimates are reviewed periodically, and, as adjustments become necessary, they are reported in earnings in the period in which they become known.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

 

The Company has adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 260-10 which provides for calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of an entity. Diluted earnings per share exclude all potentially dilutive shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as at June 30, 2016.

8

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands required disclosure about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities.  ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

●		Level 1 – Valuation based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
●		Level 2 – Valuation based on quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets.
●		Level 3 – Valuation based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring management’s best estimate of what market participants would use as fair value.

 

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

 

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments or interest rates that are comparable to market rates. These financial instruments include cash, due to stockholders, deposits and other receivables, convertible promissory notes, derivative liabilities, and accounts payable. The Company's cash and derivative liabilities, which are carried at fair value, are classified as a Level 1 financial instruments. The Company’s bank accounts are maintained with financial institutions of reputable credit, therefore, bear minimal credit risk.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the Company adopted the accounting pronouncement issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") to update guidance on how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. This guidance requires all income tax effects of awards to be recognized in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled and changes the presentation of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted these provisions on a prospective basis. In addition, this pronouncement changes guidance on: (a) accounting for forfeitures of share-based awards and (b) employers’ accounting for an employee’s use of shares to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and/or results of operations.

In February 2016, an accounting pronouncement was issued by the FASB to replace existing lease accounting guidance. This pronouncement is intended to provide enhanced transparency and comparability by requiring lessees to record right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities on the balance sheet for most leases. Expenses associated with leases will continue to be recognized in a manner similar to current accounting guidance. This pronouncement is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The adoption is required to be applied on a modified retrospective basis for each prior reporting period presented.  The Company has not yet determined the effect that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on our financial position and/or results of operations.

9

On January 1, 2016, the Company adopted the accounting pronouncement issued by the FASB which eliminates the requirement that an acquirer in a business combination account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead, an acquirer will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and/or results of operations.

On January 1, 2016, the Company adopted the accounting pronouncement issued by the FASB to update the guidance related to the presentation of debt issuance costs. This guidance requires debt issuance costs, related to a recognized debt liability, be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than being presented as an asset. The Company adopted this pronouncement on a retrospective basis, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company financial position and/or results of operations.

In November 2015, an accounting pronouncement was issued by the FASB to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes within the balance sheet. This pronouncement eliminates the requirement that deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented as current or noncurrent based on the nature of the underlying assets and liabilities. Instead, the pronouncement requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities, including valuation allowances, be classified as noncurrent. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company intend to adopt this pronouncement on January 1, 2017, and the adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and/or results of operations.

In May 2014, an accounting pronouncement was issued by the FASB to clarify existing guidance on revenue recognition. This guidance includes the required steps to achieve the core principle that a company should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The guidance permits the use of one of two retrospective transition methods. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has the Company determined the effect that the adoption of the pronouncement may have on its financial position and/or results of operations.

5. DUE TO A STOCKHOLDER

Amount due to a stockholder is unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

6. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

	As at June 30,	As at December 31,
	2016	2015
	$	$
Trade accounts payable	582,760	274,055
Accrued liabilities	28,622	139,218
	611,382	413,273

Accounts payable include amount of $149,962 (2015: $14,113) due to an entity owned by a  shareholder of the Company  in connection with consulting charges.

10

7. CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

Pursuant to a term sheet offering of $2,000,000, the Company during the year ended December 31, 2015 issued convertible promissory notes to various accredited investors amounting to $1,368,978. These notes have a maturity date of 24 months and carry annual interest rate of 11%. The note holders have the right until any time until the note is fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal portion of the note, and accrued interest, into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock. The note has a conversion price initially set at $1.78. Upon any future financings completed by the Company, the conversion price will reset to 75% of the future financing pricing. These notes do not contain prepayment penalties upon redemption.  These notes are secured by all of the present and after acquired property of the Company.    However, the Company can force conversion of these notes, if during the term of the agreement, the Company completes a public listing and the Common Share price exceeds the conversion price for at least 20 consecutive trading days. At the closing of the Notes, the Company issued cash (7%) and warrants (7% of the number of Common Shares into which the Notes may be converted) to a broker. The broker received 3% in cash and warrants for those investors introduced by the Company.  The warrants have a term of 24 months and a similar reset provision based on future financings.  

In June 2016, Biotricity commenced a bridge offering of up to an aggregate of $1,000,000 of convertible promissory notes to various investors amounting to $875,000. These notes have a maturity date of 12 months and carry an annual interest rate of 10%. The Bridge Notes principal is paid in cash and interest at 100% of the average 3 trading days volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) over the last 10 trading days plus an embedded warrant at maturity. All of the outstanding principal and accrued interest shall convert (“Forced Conversion”) into units/securities upon the consummation of a Qualified Financing, based upon the lesser of: (i) $1.65 per units/securities and (ii) the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the balance on the Forced Conversion date multiplied by 1.20 by (y) the actual price per unit/security in the Qualified Financing. Upon the Forced Conversion Date, the holders shall further be issued warrants exercisable into a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the number of Conversion Shares (but, in the case of units of securities, the primary equity security or the number of shares of Common Stock underlying the primary security if the primary security is not Common Stock).

The embedded conversion features and reset feature in the notes and broker warrants have been accounted for as a derivative liability based on FASB guidance (refer Note 8).

The movement in convertible promissory notes during the period ended June 30, 2016 is as follows:

	$
Accreted value of convertible promissory notes as at December 31, 2015	783,778
Face value of convertible promissory notes issued	175,000
Discount recognised at issuance due to embedded derivatives	(74,855)
Accretion expense	73,572
Accreted value of convertible promissory notes as at March 31, 2016	957,495
Face value of convertible promissory notes issued	700,000
Discount recognised at issuance due to embedded derivatives	(236,444)
Accretion expense	120,531
Accreted value of convertible promissory notes as at June 30, 2016	1,541,582

11

These convertible notes have been presented on the balance sheet as follows:

	$
Current	612,592
Non-current	928,990
	1,541,582

As explained in detail in Note 9, all convertible promissory notes outstanding as of February 2, 2016 were exchanged/adjusted pursuant to the Exchange Agreement effective February 2, 2016.

8. DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

In connection with the sale of debt or equity instruments, the Company may sell options or warrants to purchase its common stock. In certain circumstances, these options or warrants are classified as derivative liabilities, rather than as equity. Additionally, the debt or equity instruments may contain embedded derivative instruments, such as embedded derivative features which in certain circumstances may be required to be bifurcated from the associated host instrument and accounted for separately as a derivative instrument liability.

 

The Company's derivative instrument liabilities are re-valued at the end of each reporting period, with changes in the fair value of the derivative liability recorded as charges or credits to income in the period in which the changes occur. For options, warrants and bifurcated embedded derivative features that are accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities, the Company estimates fair value using either quoted market prices of financial instruments with similar characteristics or other valuation techniques. The valuation techniques require assumptions related to the remaining term of the instruments and risk-free rates of return, our current common stock price and expected dividend yield, and the expected volatility of our common stock price over the life of the option.

The derivative liabilities arising from convertible promissory notes/warrants and related issuance of broker warrants are as follows:

	Convertible	Broker	Total
	notes	warrants
	$	$	$
Derivative liabilities as at December 31, 2015	480,952	80,268	561,220
Derivative fair value at issuance	74,855	-	74,855
Change in fair value of derivatives	591,044	27,915	618,959
Derivative liabilities as at March 31, 2016	1,146,851	108,183	1,255,034
Derivative fair value at issuance	236,444	-	236,444
Change in fair value of derivatives	145,266	(21,998)	123,268
Derivative liabilities as at June 30, 2016	1,528,561	86,185	1,614,746

These derivative liabilities have been presented on balance sheet as follows:

	$
Current	542,294
Non-current	1,072,452
	1,614,746

12

The lattice methodology was used to value the derivative components, using the following assumptions at issuance and period end date of June 30, 2016:

Assumptions
Dividend yield	0.00%
Risk-free rate for term	0.34% - 0.41%
Volatility	101%-102%
Remaining terms (years)	1 - 1.5
Stock price ($ per share)	2.15 and 2.48

The projected annual volatility curve for valuation at issuance and period end was based on the comparable company’s annual volatility.  The Company used market trade stock prices at issuance and period end date.

9. STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

Authorized stock

 

As at June 30, 2016, the Company is authorized to issue 125,000,000 (December 31, 2015 – 100,000,000) shares of common stock ($0.001 par value) and 10,000,000 (December 31, 2015 – 1,000,000) shares of preferred stock ($0.001 par value).  

In contemplation of the acquisition of iMedical on February 2, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the increase in authorized capital stock from 100,000,000 shares of common stock to 125,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share, and from 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share. 

 

Issued and outstanding stock

As explained in detail in Note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, with the closing of the Acquisition Transaction on February 2, 2016:

·

Biotricity’s sole existing director resigned and a new director who is the sole director of the Company was appointed to fill the vacancy;

·

Biotricity’s sole Chief Executive Officer and sole officer, who beneficially owned 6,500,000 shares of outstanding common stock, resigned from all positions and transferred all of his shares back for cancellation;

·

The existing management of the Company were appointed as executive officers; and

·

The existing shareholders of the Company entered into a transaction whereby their existing common shares of the Company were exchanged for either (a) a new class of shares that are exchangeable for shares of Biotricity’s common stock, or (b) shares of Biotricity’s common stock, which (assuming exchange of all such exchangeable shares) would equal in the aggregate a number of shares of Biotricity’s common stock that constitute 90% of Biotricity’s issued and outstanding shares.

13

In addition, effective on the closing date of the acquisition transaction:

·

Biotricity issued approximately 1.197 shares of its common stock in exchange for each common share of the Company held by the Company shareholders who in general terms, are not residents of Canada (for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada).  Accordingly the Company issued 13,376,947 shares;

·

Shareholders of the Company who in general terms, are Canadian residents (for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada)) received approximately 1.197 Exchangeable Shares in the capital of Exchangeco in exchange for each common share of the Company held.  Accordingly the Company issued 9,123,031 exchangeable shares;

·

Each outstanding option to purchase common shares in the Company (whether vested or unvested) was exchanged, without any further action or consideration on the part of the holder of such option, for approximately 1.197 economically equivalent replacement options with an inverse adjustment to the exercise price of the replacement option to reflect the exchange ratio of approximately 1.197:1;

·

Each outstanding warrant  to purchase common shares in the Company was adjusted, in accordance with the terms thereof, such that it entitles the holder to receive approximately 1.197 shares of the common stock of Biotricity for each Warrant, with an inverse adjustment to the exercise price of the Warrants to reflect the exchange ratio of approximately 1.197:1

·

Each outstanding advisor warrant to purchase common shares in the Company was adjusted, in accordance with the terms thereof, such that it entitles the holder to receive approximately 1.197 shares of the common stock of Biotricity for each Advisor Warrant, with an inverse adjustment to the exercise price of the Advisor Warrants to reflect the exchange ratio of approximately 1.197:1; and

·

The outstanding 11% secured convertible promissory notes of the Company were adjusted, in accordance with the adjustment provisions thereof, as and from closing, so as to permit the holders to convert (and in some circumstances permit the Company to force the conversion of) the Convertible Promissory Notes into shares of the common stock of Biotricity at a 25% discount to purchase price per share in Biotricity’s next offering.

Issuance of preferred stock, common stock, exchangeable shares and cancellation of shares in connection with the reverse takeover transaction as explained above represents recapitalization of capital retroactively adjusting the accounting acquirer’s legal capital to reflect the legal capital of the accounting acquiree.

At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 there were 15,876,947 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Additionally, as of June 30, 2016, there were 9,123,031 outstanding exchangeable shares. There is currently one share of the Special Voting Preferred Stock issued and outstanding held by one holder of record, which is the Trustee in accordance with the terms of the Trust Agreement.

Out of outstanding common stock of 15,876,947 as at June 30, 2016, 750,000 are held in escrow and subject to forfeiture in the event the Company does not raise at least $6 million by November 2, 2016.  Of the shares of Common Stock and exchangeable shares issued and outstanding approximately 22,500,000 of such shares are or would be restricted shares under the Securities Act. 

Common stock to be issued

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the warrant holders exercised 15,569 warrants at $0.835.  The Company issued common stock subsequent to quarter end and hence at June 30, 2016, these were classified as common stock to be issued (refer warrant continuity below).

14

Stock-based compensation

On March 30, 2015, iMedical approved Directors, Officers and Employees Stock Option Plan, under which it authorized and issued 3,000,000 options.  This plan was established to enable the Company to attract and retain the services of highly qualified and experience directors, officers, employees and consultants and to give such person an interest in the success of the Company.  

These options will expire by March 30, 2025.  The outstanding options as at June 30, 2016 are as follows:

	No. of options	Exercise	Vested	Unvested
		Price	options	options
	#	$	#	#
As at December 31, 2015	167,500	0.0001	-	167,500
Adjustment*	33,000	-	-	33,000
As at June 30, 2016	200,500	0.0001	-	200,500

* As explained above, on February 2, 2016 all outstanding options have been increased by a factor of 1.197.

In addition, on February 2, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company approved 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The purpose of the Plan is to advance the interests of the participating company group and its stockholders by providing an incentive to attract, retain and reward persons performing services for the participating company group and by motivating such persons to contribute to the growth and profitability of the participating company group. The Plan seeks to achieve this purpose by providing for awards in the form of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock purchase rights, restricted stock bonuses, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and other stock-based awards.

The Plan shall continue in effect until its termination by the Committee; provided, however, that all Awards shall be granted, if at all, on or before the day immediately preceding the tenth (10th) anniversary of the effective date.  the maximum number of shares of stock that may be issued under the Plan pursuant to awards shall be equal to 3,750,000 shares; provided that the maximum number of shares of stock that may be issued under the Plan pursuant to awards shall automatically and without any further Company or shareholder approval, increase on January 1 of each year for not more than 10 years from the Effective Date, so the number of shares that may be issued is an amount no greater than 15% of the Company’s outstanding shares of stock and shares of stock underlying any outstanding exchangeable shares as of such January 1; provided further that no such increase shall be effective if it would violate any applicable law or stock exchange rule or regulation, or result in adverse tax consequences to the Company or any participant that would not otherwise result but for the increase.

As of the date of the filing of this report, the Company has not granted any incentives under the above plan.

Broker warrants

The outstanding broker warrants as at June 30, 2016 will expire by May 2018 as detailed below.  

	No. of broker	Weighted Average
	warrants	Exercise
		Price
	#	$
As at December 31, 2015	271,742	1.2000
Adjustment*	53,503	(0.1970)
As at June 30, 2016	325,245	1.0030

* As explained above, on February 2, 2016 all outstanding broker warrants have been increased by a factor of 1.197.

15

Warrants

The outstanding warrants as at June 30, 2016 will expire by October 2016 as detailed below.  

	No. of	Weighted Average
	warrants	Exercise
		Price
	#	$
As at December 31, 2015	380,000	1.0000
Adjustment*	74,860	(0.1970)
As at March 31, 2016	454,860	0.8030
Less: exercised warrants	(15,569)	0.8350
Less: expired warrants	(223,822)	0.8030
As at June 30, 2016	215,469	0.8007

* As explained above, on February 2, 2016 all outstanding warrants have been increased by a factor of 1.197.

10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES

The Company’s transactions with related parties were carried out on normal commercial terms and in the course of the Company’s business.

Other than those disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements, the related party transactions are as follows:

The Company paid consulting charges in cash to its stockholders amounting to $45,126 and $90,252 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 (2015:  $72,864 and $133,584), respectively.

11. COMMITMENTS

a)

On September 14, 2014, the Company finalized an agreement with CardioComm Solutions Inc. (“CardioComm’) for the development of a customized software for the ECG.  The term of this agreement is the later of 5 years or completion of all services from the effective date of agreement, which is September 14, 2014.  Pursuant to this agreement, the Company paid CardioComm a non-refundable royalty advance of $224,775 (CAD 250,000), which was fully expensed during year ended December 31, 2014 as the Company is still under research and development phase. In addition, the Company has committed to pay $584,415 for design of a Windows Operating System ECG Management Software in accordance with an estimated payment schedules for the work performed.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company paid $67,689 and $135,378 (2015: $72,864 and $145,728), respectively which were expensed and included in research and development expenses.  

b)

On July 4, 2014, the Company entered into an operating lease contract for its office premises in Mississauga, Ontario for a one year term. The monthly lease payment was $3,910 which was increased to $7,931. The lease agreement also include provisions of Cloud Hosting services at $2,737 per month and telephone and internet services at $1,173 per month.

c)

On January 8, 2016, the Company entered into a 40-month lease agreement for its office premises in California, USA. The monthly rent from the date of commencement to the 12th month is $16,530, from the 13th to the 24th month is $17,026, from the 25th to the 36th month is $17,536, and the final 3 months is $18,062.

16

12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company’s management has evaluated subsequent events up to August 15, 2016, the date the financial statements were issued, pursuant to the requirements of ASC 855 and has determined the following material subsequent events:

During July and August 2016, the Company issued a total of 125,000 common shares to consultants in connection with the services provided by them.  The value of the services will be determined based on the market price on the date of issuance.

During July 2016, 110,742 warrants were exercised at an exercise price of $0.835.

On August 1, 2016, the Company entered into a subscription agreement by and among the Company and the lending parties for the issuance of an aggregate principal amount of $425,000 unsecured convertible promissory notes pursuant to an offering to accredited investors for up to $2,500,000 (increased from the original amount of $1,000,000), of which $875,000 have previously been sold (also refer Note 7).

17

Item 2.

  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Except for historical information contained herein, this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contains forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements were based on various factors and were derived utilizing numerous important assumptions and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Important assumptions and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, include but are not limited to: (a) any fluctuations in sales and operating results; (b) risks associated with international operations; (c) regulatory, competitive and contractual risks; (d) development risks; (e) the ability to achieve strategic initiatives, including but not limited to the ability to achieve sales growth across the business segments through a combination of enhanced sales force, new products, and customer service; (f) competition in the Company’s existing and potential future product lines of business; (g) the Company’s ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms if and when needed; (h) uncertainty as to the Company’s future profitability; (i) uncertainty as to the future profitability of acquired businesses or product lines; and (j) uncertainty as to any future expansion of the Company. Other factors and assumptions not identified above were also involved in the derivation of these forward-looking statements and the failure of such assumptions to be realized as well as other factors may also cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. The Company assumes no obligation to update these forward looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements. Past results are no guaranty of future performance. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates they are made. When used in this Report, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “estimates,” “plans,” “intends,” “will” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Financial Statements”).

Company Overview

We are a healthcare technology company committed to the development of software and hardware solutions to help the management of chronic health issues. We aim to provide a turnkey, wearable medical cardiac monitoring solution. To achieve this, we are dedicated to continuing our research and development programs, honing our medical-device expertise, increasing our deep knowledge of biometrics, developing both software and hardware components and nurturing a cohesive medical network.

Plan of Operation and Recent Corporate Developments

We were incorporated on August 29, 2012 in the State of Nevada. At the time of our incorporation the name of our company was Metasolutions, Inc. On January 27, 2016, we filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation, effective as of February 1, 2016, whereby, among other things, we changed our name to Biotricity Inc. and increased the authorized number of shares of common stock from 100,000,000 to 125,000,000 and “blank check” preferred stock from 1,000,000 to 10,000,000.

On February 2, 2016 we acquired Biotricity, through our indirect subsidiary Exchangeco and consummated the Acquisition Transaction. Immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition Transaction, we transferred all of the then-existing business, properties, assets, operations, liabilities and goodwill of the Company, to W270 SA, a Costa Rican corporation, pursuant to the Assignment and Assumption Agreement. Accordingly, as of immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition Transaction, we had no assets or liabilities.

18

Critical Accounting Policies

The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and are expressed in United States Dollars. Significant accounting policies are summarized below:

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Areas involving significant estimates and assumptions include: deferred income tax assets and related valuation allowance, accruals and valuation of derivatives, promissory notes and stock options. Actual results could differ from those estimates. These estimates are reviewed periodically, and, as adjustments become necessary, they are reported in earnings in the period in which they become known.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

 

The Company has adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 260-10 which provides for calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of an entity. Diluted earnings per share exclude all potentially dilutive shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as at June 30, 2016.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands required disclosure about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities.  ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

●		Level 1 – Valuation based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
●		Level 2 – Valuation based on quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets.
●		Level 3 – Valuation based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring management’s best estimate of what market participants would use as fair value.

 

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

 

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments or interest rates that are comparable to market rates. These financial instruments include cash and accounts payable. The Company's cash, which is carried at fair value, is classified as a Level 1 financial instrument. The Company’s bank accounts are maintained with financial institutions of reputable credit, therefore, bear minimal credit risk.

19

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the Company adopted the accounting pronouncement issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") to update guidance on how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. This guidance requires all income tax effects of awards to be recognized in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled and changes the presentation of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted these provisions on a prospective basis. In addition, this pronouncement changes guidance on: (a) accounting for forfeitures of share-based awards and (b) employers’ accounting for an employee’s use of shares to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and/or results of operations.

In February 2016, an accounting pronouncement was issued by the FASB to replace existing lease accounting guidance. This pronouncement is intended to provide enhanced transparency and comparability by requiring lessees to record right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities on the balance sheet for most leases. Expenses associated with leases will continue to be recognized in a manner similar to current accounting guidance. This pronouncement is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The adoption is required to be applied on a modified retrospective basis for each prior reporting period presented.  The Company has not yet determined the effect that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on its financial position and/or results of operations.

On January 1, 2016, the Company adopted the accounting pronouncement issued by the FASB which eliminates the requirement that an acquirer in a business combination account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead, an acquirer will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and/or results of operations.

On January 1, 2016, the Company adopted the accounting pronouncement issued by the FASB to update the guidance related to the presentation of debt issuance costs. This guidance requires debt issuance costs, related to a recognized debt liability, be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than being presented as an asset. The Company adopted this pronouncement on a retrospective basis, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company financial position and/or results of operations.

In November 2015, an accounting pronouncement was issued by the FASB to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes within the balance sheet. This pronouncement eliminates the requirement that deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented as current or noncurrent based on the nature of the underlying assets and liabilities. Instead, the pronouncement requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities, including valuation allowances, be classified as noncurrent. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company intend to adopt this pronouncement on January 1, 2017, and the adoption is not expected to have a material impact on its financial position and/or results of operations.

In May 2014, an accounting pronouncement was issued by the FASB to clarify existing guidance on revenue recognition. This guidance includes the required steps to achieve the core principle that a company should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The guidance permits the use of one of two retrospective transition methods. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has the Company determined the effect that the adoption of the pronouncement may have on its financial position and/or results of operations.

20

Results of Operations

From our inception in July 2009 through to June 30, 2016, Biotricity has generated a deficit of $11,542,487. We expect to incur additional operating losses through the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 and beyond, principally as a result of our continuing anticipated research and development costs and due to anticipated initial limited sales of the Bioflux, our planned first product. When we approach final stages of the anticipated commercialization of the Bioflux, we will have to devote and expect to continue to devote significant resources in the areas of capital expenditures and research and development costs.

Three and Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2016 as Compared to Three and Six Month Period Ended June 30, 2015

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2016 were $800,808 and $1,377,383 compared to $492,013 and $2,298,418 for the three and six months period ended June 30, 2015, as further described below.

For the three and six months period ended June 30, 2016, we incurred general and administrative expenses of $534,438 and $869,524, compared to $293,694 and $1,732,905 for the three and six months period ended June 30, 2015. The increase for the three months period ended June 30, 2016 is mainly due to increase in activity due to the reverse merger transaction between Biotricity and iMedical on February 2, 2016. The decrease for the six months period ended June 30, 2016 is mainly due to recording $1,297,586 as employee stock option expense during the six months ended June 30, 2015, whereas no such expense was recorded during six months ended June 30, 2016.

For the three and six month period ended June 30, 2016, we incurred research and development expenses of $266,370 and $507,903, compared to research and development expenses of $198,319 and $565,513 for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2015. There is no significant variation in the overall research and development expenses for both the quarters.

Accretion expense of $120,531 and $194,103 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $123,268 and $742,227, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 relate to the convertible promissory notes issued as explained in Note 7 to the Financial Statements. There were no convertible promissory notes issued during the three and six months period ended June 30, 2015.

Net Loss

Net loss for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2016 were $1,044,607 and $2,313,713 (2015: $492,013 and $2,298,418), resulting in a loss per share of $0.0418 and $0.0925 for the three and six months period ended June 30, 2016 (2015: $0.0232 and $0.1053).

Translation Adjustment

Translation adjustment for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2016 were ($129,591) and ($191,109), as compared to translation adjustment gain of $193,585 and $59,655 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. This translation adjustment represents loss resulted from the translation of currency in the financial statements from our functional currency of Canadian dollars to the reporting currency in U.S. dollars.

21

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We are a development stage company and have not yet realized any revenues from our planned operations. We have working capital deficit of $1,668,231 at June 30, 2016, and have incurred a deficit of $11,542,487 from inception to June 30, 2016. We have funded operations primarily through the issuance of capital stock and other securities.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, we raised net cash of $875,000 through the issuance of convertible promissory notes. Subsequent to quarter end through August 15, 2016, we raised an additional $425,000 through the issuance of convertible promissory notes and we intend to raise up to $2.5 million in the aggregate.

As we proceed with the commercialization of the Bioflux product development we have devoted and expect to continue to devote significant resources in the areas of capital expenditures and research and development costs and operations, marketing and sales expenditures.

We expect to require additional funds to further develop our business plan, including the anticipated commercialization of the Bioflux and Biolife products. Based on our current operating plans, we will require approximately $6 million to complete the development of Bioflux including marketing, sales, regulatory and clinical costs to first introduce this product into the market place.  We expect to require an additional approximately $4 million to also complete the development of our Bioflux product and increase penetration in new and existing markets and expand our intellectual property platform, which we anticipate would lead to profitability. Since it is impossible to predict with certainty the timing and amount of funds required to launch the Bioflux and Biolife product in any other markets or any of our other proposed products, we anticipate that we will need to raise additional funds through equity or debt offerings or otherwise in order to meet our expected future liquidity requirements. Any such financing that we undertake will likely be dilutive to existing stockholders. We are currently in discussion to raise at least $6 million in equity financing of which we can give no assurance of success.

In addition, we expect to also need additional funds to respond to business opportunities and challenges, including our ongoing operating expenses, protecting our intellectual property, developing or acquiring new lines of business and enhancing our operating infrastructure. While we may need to seek additional funding for such purposes, we may not be able to obtain financing on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, the terms of our financings may be dilutive to, or otherwise adversely affect, holders of our common stock. We may also seek additional funds through arrangements with collaborators or other third parties. We may not be able to negotiate any such arrangements on acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to obtain additional funding on a timely basis, we may be required to curtail or terminate some or all of our proposed product lines.

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we used cash in operating activities of $1,124,358 compared to $934,486 for the six months ended June 30, 2015.  This is due to non-cash employee stock option compensation expense of $1,297,586 recorded during June 30, 2015 offset by recording of $194,103 and $742,227 as accretion expense and change in fair value in connection with issuance of convertible notes during the six months period ended June 30, 2016.

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $898,929 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $470,758 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase is primarily due to proceeds received from issuance of convertible notes of $875,000 during the six months period ended June 30, 2016.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

22

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-15(e). The Company's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance of reaching the Company's desired disclosure control objectives. In designing periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. The Company's certifying officer has concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in reaching that level of assurance.

At the end of the period being reported upon, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Management has confidence in its internal controls and procedures. The Company’s management believes that a control system, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance and cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the internal control system are met, and no evaluation of internal controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. Further, the design of an internal control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitation in all internal control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issuers and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the transition period ended June 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Internal control systems, no matter how well designed and operated, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even a system which is determined to be effective cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues have been detected or prevented. Our systems of internal controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

23

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

None

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Not applicable for smaller reporting companies  

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, we issued an aggregate of 15,569 shares of our common stock upon the exercise of outstanding warrants. The issuance of such shares was not registered under the Securities Act of 1933. We relied upon the exemption from securities registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for transactions not involving a public offering.

Except as set forth above, all unregistered issuances of securities during the period covered by this quarterly report have been previously disclosed on the Company’s current reports on Form 8-K.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5.

Other Information.

None.

Item 6.

Exhibits

31.1

Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.1

XBRL Instance.

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation.

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition.

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels.

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation.

24

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 15^th day of August 2016.

BIOTRICITY, INC.

By: /s/ Waqaas Al Siddiq

Name: Waqaas Al-Siddiq

Title: Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive and financial officer)

25