BK Technologies Corp - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission file number 000-07336
RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
Nevada
|
59-3486297
|
|
State or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
|
Incorporation or organization
|
Identification No.)
|
7100 Technology Drive
West Melbourne, Florida 32904
(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (321) 984-1414
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes R No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes £ No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
|
o
|
Accelerated filer
|
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
þ
|
Smaller reporting company
|
o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No R
There were 13,497,815 shares of common stock, $0.60 par value, of the registrant outstanding at October 23, 2010.
PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)(Unaudited)
September 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current assets:
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 6,315 | $ | 7,660 | ||||
Trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful
|
||||||||
accounts of $44 at September 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009, respectively)
|
4,500 | 3,767 | ||||||
Inventories, net
|
10,174 | 6,623 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets, net
|
1,269 | 1,611 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
1,090 | 896 | ||||||
Total current assets
|
23,348 | 20,557 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
1,435 | 1,306 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets, net
|
6,203 | 6,183 | ||||||
Capitalized software, net
|
3,997 | 3,024 | ||||||
Other assets
|
293 | 351 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 35,276 | $ | 31,421 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | 2,360 | $ | 1,250 | ||||
Accrued compensation and related taxes
|
829 | 1,086 | ||||||
Accrued warranty expense
|
243 | 228 | ||||||
Accrued other expenses and other current liabilities
|
306 | 195 | ||||||
Total current liabilities
|
3,738 | 2,759 | ||||||
Deferred revenue
|
$ | 78 | $ | − | ||||
Long-term debt
|
2,000 | $ | − | |||||
Commitments and Contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders’ equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred stock; $1.00 par value; 1,000,000 authorized shares:
|
||||||||
none issued or outstanding
|
− | − | ||||||
Common stock; $.60 par value; 20,000,000 authorized shares:
|
||||||||
13,489,815 and 13,416,127 issued and outstanding shares at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
|
8,094 | 8,050 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
24,357 | 24,071 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(2,991 | ) | (3,459 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' equity
|
29,460 | 28,662 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 35,276 | $ | 31,421 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
2010
|
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2010
|
September 30,
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Sales, net
|
$ | 7,052 | $ | 8,292 | $ | 20,579 | $ | 22,141 | ||||||||
Expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost of products
|
3,780 | 4,058 | 10,943 | 11,398 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
|
3,003 | 2,718 | 8,810 | 7,802 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses
|
6,783 | 6,776 | 19,753 | 19,200 | ||||||||||||
Operating income
|
269 | 1,516 | 826 | 2,941 | ||||||||||||
Other (expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Net interest expense
|
(6 | ) | (5 | ) | (6 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||||||
Other expense
|
(2 | ) | (7 | ) | (8 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||
Total other expense
|
(8 | ) | (12 | ) | (14 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income tax expense
|
261 | 1,504 | 812 | 2,896 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense
|
(134 | ) | (577 | ) | (344 | ) | (881 | ) | ||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 127 | $ | 927 | $ | 468 | $ | 2,015 | ||||||||
Net earnings per share-basic:
|
$ | 0.01 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||||
Net earnings per share-diluted:
|
$ | 0.01 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic
|
13,489,815 | 13,410,871 | 13,472,207 | 13,410,871 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted
|
13,736,386 | 13,726,129 | 13,827,014 | 13,520,072 | ||||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
Nine months Ended
|
||||||||
September 30,
2010
|
September 30,
2009
|
|||||||
Operating activities
|
||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 468 | $ | 2,015 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in ) provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
17 | (36 | ) | |||||
Inventories reserve
|
247 | (135 | ) | |||||
Deferred tax asset
|
342 | 855 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
486 | 503 | ||||||
Shared-based compensation expense
|
231 | 43 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
(20 | ) | - | |||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
(750 | ) | (2,422 | ) | ||||
Inventories
|
(3,798 | ) | 3,763 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
(194 | ) | 455 | |||||
Other assets
|
58 | (22 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable
|
1,110 | (101 | ) | |||||
Accrued compensation and related taxes
|
(257 | ) | 500 | |||||
Accrued warranty expense
|
15 | (78 | ) | |||||
Accrued other expenses and other current liabilities
|
111 | 210 | ||||||
Deferred revenue
|
78 | - | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
(1,856 | ) | 5,550 | |||||
Investing activities
|
||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
(439 | ) | (341 | ) | ||||
Capitalized software
|
(1,149 | ) | (1,116 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(1,588 | ) | (1,457 | ) | ||||
Financing activities
|
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
79 | - | ||||||
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
20 | - | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in revolving credit line
|
2,000 | (1,500 | ) | |||||
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
2,099 | (1,500 | ) | |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,345 | ) | 2,593 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
7,660 | 5,475 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 6,315 | $ | 8,068 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure
|
||||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | 6 | $ | 46 | ||||
Cash paid for income tax
|
$ | 11 | $ | 51 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(in Thousands, Except Share Data and Percentages)
1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 have been prepared by RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company), and are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation have been made. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements at that date.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for a full year.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU 2009-14) which amended the accounting requirements under the Software Topic, ASC 985-605 Revenue Recognition. The objective of this update is to address the accounting for revenue arrangements that contain tangible products and software. Specifically, products that contain software that is “more than incidental” to the product as a whole will be removed from the scope of Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) subtopic 985-605 (previously AICPA Statement of Position 97-2). The amendments align the accounting for these revenue transaction types with the amendments under ASU 2009-13. The guidance provided within ASU 2009-14 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and allows for either prospective or retrospective application, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU2009-13, Revenue Recognition – Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. ASU 2009-13 updates the existing multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance currently included in ASC 605-25. The revised guidance provides for two significant changes to the existing multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance. The first change relates to the determination of when the individual deliverables included in a multiple-element arrangement may be treated as separate units of accounting. This change will result in the requirement to separate more deliverables within an arrangement, ultimately leading to less revenue deferral. The second change modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across the separately identified deliverables. Together, these changes will result in earlier recognition of revenue and related costs for multiple-element arrangements than under previous guidance. This guidance expands the disclosures required for multiple-element revenue arrangements and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the potential future impact, if any, of this guidance on its financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, which requires new fair value disclosures pertaining to significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfers and activity. For Level 3 fair value measurements, purchases, sales, issuances and settlements must be reported on a gross basis. Further, additional disclosures are required by class of assets or liabilities, as well as inputs used to measure fair value and valuation techniques. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company’s adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(in Thousands, Except Share Data and Percentages)
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, which amends subsequent event disclosure requirements for SEC filers. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This ASU was effective upon issuance and the Company’s adoption of this ASU did not result in a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
2. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts on trade receivables was approximately $44 on gross trade receivables of $4,544 and $3,811 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. This allowance is used to state trade receivables at a net realizable value or the amount that the Company estimates will be collected of the Company’s gross receivables.
3. Inventories, net
The components of inventory, net of reserves for slow-moving, excess or obsolete inventory, consist of the following:
September 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||
Finished goods
|
$ | 2,136 | $ | 1,879 | ||||
Work in process
|
5,012 | 2,172 | ||||||
Raw materials
|
3,026 | 2,572 | ||||||
$ | 10,174 | $ | 6,623 |
Reserves for slow-moving, excess, or obsolete inventory were approximately $2,594 at September 30, 2010, compared with approximately $2,346 at December 31, 2009. The reserve for slow-moving, excess, or obsolete inventory is used to state the Company’s inventories at the lower of cost or market.
4. Income Taxes
Net income tax expense totaling approximately $134 and $344 has been recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company’s deferred tax assets totaled approximately $7,472, compared with $7,794 as of December 31, 2009, and are primarily composed of net operating loss carry forwards (NOLs). These NOLs are available to offset certain Federal or state taxable income and expire starting in 2018 through 2028.
In order to fully realize the net deferred tax assets, the Company will need to generate sufficient taxable income in future years to utilize its NOLs prior to their expiration. ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes” requires the Company to analyze all positive and negative evidence to determine if, based on the weight of available evidence, the Company is more likely than not to realize the benefit of the net deferred tax assets. The recognition of the net deferred tax assets and related tax benefit is based upon the Company’s conclusions regarding, among other considerations, estimates of future earnings based on information currently available, current and anticipated customers, contracts and product introductions, as well as historical operating results and certain tax planning strategies.
The Company has evaluated the available evidence and the likelihood of realizing the benefit of its net deferred tax assets. From its evaluation, the Company has concluded that based on the weight of available evidence the Company is more likely than not to realize the benefit of its net deferred tax assets recorded at September 30, 2010. Accordingly, no valuation allowance has been established. The Company cannot presently estimate what, if any, changes to the valuation of its deferred tax assets may be deemed appropriate in the future. If the Company incurs future losses, it may be necessary to record a valuation allowance related to the deferred tax assets recorded as of September 30, 2010.
In April 2010, the Company was notified by the Internal Revenue Service of its intent to examine the Company’s federal tax return for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The examination has commenced with an anticipated completion date of December 2010.
6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(in Thousands, Except Share Data and Percentages)
5. Capitalized Software
The Company accounts for the costs of software within its products in accordance with ASC Topic 985-20 “Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed”, under which certain software costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility are capitalized and amortized over the estimated lives of the related products. The Company determines technological feasibility to be established upon the internal release of a detailed program design as specified by Topic 985-20. Upon the general release of the product to customers, development costs for that product are amortized over periods not exceeding five years, based on current and future revenue of the product. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company’s amortization cost was $58 and $176, respectively, compared with $59 and $176 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Net capitalized software costs totaled $3,997 and $3,024 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
6. Stockholders’ Equity
The changes in consolidated stockholders’ equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are as follows:
Common Stock Shares
|
Common Stock Amount
|
Additional Paid-In Capital
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
13,416,127 | $ | 8,050 | $ | 24,071 | $ | (3,459 | ) | $ | 28,662 | ||||||||||
Common stock option exercise and issued
|
73,688 | 44 | 35 | 79 | ||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit from share- based compensation
|
20 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense
|
− | − | 231 | − | 231 | |||||||||||||||
Net income
|
− | − | − | 468 | 468 | |||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
13,489,815 | $ | 8,094 | $ | 24,357 | $ | (2,991 | ) | $ | 29,460 |
7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(in Thousands, Except Share Data and Percentages)
7. Income per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income per share:
Three Months Ended
|
Nine months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
2010
|
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2010
|
September 30,
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Numerator:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net income (numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share)
|
$ | 127 | $ | 927 | $ | 468 | $ | 2,015 | ||||||||
Denominator:
|
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per share weighted average shares
|
13,489,815 | 13,410,871 | 13,472,207 | 13,410,871 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Options
|
246,571 | 315,258 | 354,808 | 109,201 | ||||||||||||
Denominator
|
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per share weighted average shares
|
13,736,386 | 13,726,129 | 13,827,014 | 13,520,072 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic income per share
|
$ | 0.01 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||||
Diluted income per share
|
$ | 0.01 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.15 |
8. Non-Cash Share-Based Employee Compensation
The Company has employee and non-employee director stock option programs. Related to these programs, and in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”, the Company recorded $51 and $231 of non-cash share-based employee compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared with $12 and $43 for the same periods last year. The Company considers its non-cash share-based employee compensation expenses as a component of cost of products ($3 and $22 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared with $0 for the same periods last year) and selling, general and administrative expenses ($48 and $209 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared with $12 and $43 for the same periods last year). There was no non-cash share–based employee compensation expense capitalized as part of capital expenditures or inventory for the periods presented.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model to calculate the fair value of a stock option grant. The non-cash share-based employee compensation expense recorded in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was calculated using the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the period of time commensurate with the expected life of the stock options. The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that the Company presently has no intention to pay cash dividends in the future and the Company is prohibited from doing so under its current secured revolving credit facility. The Company has estimated future stock option exercises by the optionees. The expected term of option grants is based upon the observed and expected time to the date of post vesting exercises and forfeitures of options by the optionees. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the average U.S. Treasury rate for the periods, which approximates the rate at the time of the stock option grant.
Three months ended
September 30, 2010
|
||||
Expected Term in Years
|
3.0-6.5 | |||
Expected Volatility
|
76.6% -83.7% | |||
Risk-Free Rate
|
2.54% | |||
Expected Dividends
|
0.00 |
8
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(in Thousands, Except Share Data and Percentages)
A summary of stock option activity under the Company’s stock option plans as of September 30, 2010, and changes during the three months ended September 30, 2010 are presented below:
|
Stock Options
|
Wgt. Avg. Exercise
Price ($)
|
Wgt. Avg. Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
|
Wgt. Avg. Grant Date Fair Value($)
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value ($)
|
|||||||||||||||
As of July 1, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
|
1,061,224 | 2.64 | - | 1.74 | - | |||||||||||||||
Vested
|
906,222 | 2.57 | - | 1.68 | - | |||||||||||||||
Nonvested
|
155,002 | 3.03 | - | 2.08 | - | |||||||||||||||
Period activity
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Issued
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Expired
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
|
1,061,224 | 2.64 | 3.71 | 1.74 | 543,145 | |||||||||||||||
Vested
|
906,222 | 2.57 | 2.96 | 1.68 | 510,561 | |||||||||||||||
Nonvested
|
155,002 | 3.03 | 8.09 | 2.08 | 32,584 |
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
From time to time the Company may be involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of its business. There were no pending material claims or legal matters as of September 30, 2010.
Other
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had commitments for purchase orders to suppliers of approximately $4,688.
Significant Customers
Sales to United States government agencies represented approximately $4,778 (67.8%) and $14,081 (68.4%) of the Company’s total sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared with approximately $5,723 (67.8%) and $13,977 (62.2%) for the same periods last year. Accounts receivable from agencies of the United States government were approximately $3,070 as of September 30, 2010 compared with approximately $3,004 at the end of the same period last year.
9
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(in Thousands, Except Share Data and Percentages)
10. Outstanding debt
As previously reported, on October 20, 2010, the Company, RELM Communications, Inc., the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, and Silicon Valley Bank, as lender (“SVB”), amended their Loan and Security Agreement as of October 23, 2008 (the “Loan and Security Agreement”), under which the Company’s existing secured revolving credit facility is maintained, by entering into the First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement (the “First Amendment”). Under the First Amendment, the Company’s existing secured revolving credit facility with SVB was amended as follows:
●
|
maximum borrowing availability has been increased to $5,000 from $3,500;
|
●
|
the maturity date has been extended to December 31, 2012 from October 23, 2010;
|
●
|
the variable rate at which borrowings bear interest has been reduced to prime rate plus 50 basis points from prime rate plus 100 basis points (such 100 basis points previously subject to reduction of 50 basis points anytime the Company’s quarterly net income was greater than $1,000); and
|
●
|
the Company’s minimum “tangible net worth” requirement has been reset at $25,350, such minimum requirement still continuing to be subject to increase by (i) 50% of quarterly net profits and (ii) 75% of the net proceeds received from issuances of equity and issuances of “subordinated debt” and
|
●
|
the unused revolving line fee has been reduced to 20 basis points from 30 basis points.
|
The Company continues to be subject to the substantially same customary borrowing terms and conditions under the SVB credit facility as it was prior to the First Amendment, including the accuracy of representations and warranties, compliance with financial maintenance and restrictive covenants and the absence of events of default.
The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Loan and Security Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment, as of the date of this report. As of the date of this report, borrowings outstanding under the SVB credit facility totaled $2.0 million and the Company had approximately $0.6 million of additional borrowing availability.
The foregoing description of the SVB credit facility and the Loan and Security Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment, does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the First Amendment filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 20, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 20, 2010, and incorporated herein by this reference.
10
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SPECIAL NOTE CONCERNING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We believe that it is important to communicate our future expectations to our security holders and to the public. This report, therefore, contains statements about future events and expectations which are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Sections 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including the statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and prospects under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” You can expect to identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “might,” “could,” “would,” ”will,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “expect,” “intend,” “seek” and other similar expressions. Any statement contained in this report that is not a statement of historical fact may be deemed to be a forward-looking statement. Although we believe that the plans, objectives, expectations and prospects reflected in or suggested by our forward-looking statements are reasonable, those statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that our plans, objectives, expectations and prospects will be achieved.
Important factors that might cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements are contained in the “Risk Factors” section of and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and in our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and include, among others, the following:
|
●
|
changes in customer preferences;
|
|
●
|
our inventory and debt levels;
|
|
●
|
heavy reliance on sales to agencies of the United States government;
|
|
●
|
federal, state and local government budget deficits and spending limitations;
|
|
●
|
quality of management, business abilities and judgment of our personnel;
|
|
●
|
the availability, terms and deployment of capital;
|
|
●
|
competition in the land mobile radio industry;
|
|
●
|
reliance on contract manufacturers;
|
|
●
|
limitations in available radio spectrum for use of land mobile radios;
|
|
●
|
changes or advances in technology; and
|
|
●
|
general economic and business conditions.
|
We assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made in this report, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions or otherwise, after the date of this report. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
Reported dollar amounts in management’s discussion and analysis are disclosed in millions or as whole dollar amounts.
Executive Summary
Our financial and operating results for the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 declined compared with the same periods last year.
11
Sales of P25 digital products for the three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased slightly compared with the same period last year. For the current year’s nine-month period, P25 digital product sales were slightly higher than the same period last year.
Previously announced orders from branches of the U.S. Military for $3.2 million and from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service for $2.5 million were received near the end of the third quarter of 2010. Consequently, only a portion of these orders was fulfilled in the third quarter. The remainder of these orders is anticipated to be fulfilled during the fourth quarter of 2010.
We also continued to progress with our P25 Trunking development; introducing the initial models of our P25 Trunked products in September 2010.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, total sales were approximately $7.1 million and $20.6 million, respectively, compared with approximately $8.3 million and $22.1 million for the same periods last year. Sales of P25 digital products for the third quarter of 2010 totaled approximately $4.5 million (63.9% of total sales) compared with approximately $4.9 million (59.4% of total sales) for the same quarter last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, sales of P25 digital products totaled approximately $13.4 million (65.2% of total sales) compared with approximately $13.0 million (58.7% of total sales) for the same period last year.
Gross margins as a percentage of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were 46.4% compared with 51.1% for the same quarter last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 gross margins were approximately 46.8% compared with 48.5% for the same period last year. Our gross margins for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 reflect competitive pricing pressures and additional manufacturing costs.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, selling, general and administrative expenses totaled approximately $3.0 million (42.6% of sales) compared with approximately $2.7 million (32.8% of sales) for the same period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, selling, general and administrative expenses totaled approximately $8.8 million (42.8% of sales) compared with approximately $7.8 million (35.2% of sales) for the same period last year. Increases from the same periods last year reflect additional marketing and sales costs, as well as product development initiatives.
Pretax income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled approximately $261,000 and $812,000, respectively, compared with approximately $1.5 million and $2.9 million for the same periods last year.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized income tax expense, which was primarily non-cash, of approximately $134,000 and $344,000, respectively, compared with approximately $577,000 and $881,000 for the same periods last year.
Net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $127,000 ($0.01 per basic share and diluted share) and $468,000 ($0.03 per basic and diluted share), compared with approximately $927,000 ($0.07 per basic and diluted share) and $2.0 million ($0.15 per basic and diluted share) for the same periods last year.
As of September 30, 2010, working capital totaled approximately $19.6 million, of which approximately $10.8 million was comprised of cash and trade receivables. As of December 31, 2009 working capital totaled approximately $17.7 million of which approximately $11.4 million was comprised of cash and trade receivables.
12
Results of Operations
As an aid to understanding our operating results for the periods covered by this report, the following table shows selected items from our condensed consolidated statements of income expressed as a percentage of sales:
Percentage of Sales
Three Months Ended
|
Percentage of Sales
Nine months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
2010
|
September 30,
2009
|
September 30,
2010
|
September 30,
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Sales
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of products
|
(53.6 | ) | (48.9 | ) | (53.2 | ) | (51.5 | ) | ||||||||
Gross margin
|
46.4 | 51.1 | 46.8 | 48.5 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
(42.6 | ) | (32.8 | ) | (42.8 | ) | (35.2 | ) | ||||||||
Net interest (expense) income
|
(0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.0 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||
Other income
|
(0.0 | ) | 0.0 | (0.0 | ) | 0.0 | ||||||||||
Pretax income
|
3.7 | 18.0 | 4.0 | 13.1 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense
|
(1.9 | ) | (7.0 | ) | (1.7 | ) | (4.0 | ) | ||||||||
Net income
|
1.8 | % | 11.0 | % | 2.3 | % | 9.1 | % |
Net Sales
Net sales for the third quarter ended September 30, 2010, totaled approximately $7.1 million compared with approximately $8.3 million for the same quarter last year. Sales of P25 digital products for the quarter totaled approximately $4.5 million (63.9% of total sales), compared with approximately $4.9 million (59.4% of total sales) for the same quarter last year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, total sales were approximately $20.6 million, compared with approximately $22.1 million for the same period last year. Sales of P25 digital products for the nine-month period totaled approximately $13.4 million (65.2% of total sales) compared with approximately $13.0 million (58.7% of total sales) for the same period last year.
Sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 declined compared to the same periods last year primarily due to the timing of certain customer orders. Previously announced orders from branches of the U.S. Military for $3.2 million and from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service for $2.5 million were received near the end of the third quarter of 2010. Consequently, only a portion of these orders was fulfilled in the third quarter. The remainder of these orders is anticipated to be fulfilled during the fourth quarter of 2010.
During the third quarter of 2010 progress continued on the development of our P25 trunking products, culminating in the September 2010 introduction of the first models of our KNG trunked products. Approximately $2.7 million of the aforementioned orders from the U.S. Military were for these new trunked products.
Cost of Products and Gross Margin
Gross margins as a percentage of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were 46.4% compared with 51.1% for the same quarter last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, gross margins as a percentage of sales were 46.8% compared with 48.5% for the same period last year.
Our cost of products and gross margins are primarily related to product mix, manufacturing volumes and pricing. Compared with the same quarter last year, our gross margins for the quarter reflected the impact of product costs and competitive pricing considerations, as well as a change in the mix of products sold. Some of the product costs were related to specific non-recurring circumstances.
13
We continue to utilize contract manufacturing relationships to maximize production efficiencies and minimize material and labor costs. We also regularly consider manufacturing alternatives to improve quality, speed and to reduce our product costs. We anticipate that the current contract manufacturing relationships or comparable alternatives will be available to us in the future. Leveraging increased sales volumes and P-25 product sales combined with the introduction of planned new products, we believe, should result in further cost improvements and efficiencies. We anticipate that product cost and competitive pricing pressures will continue in future quarters, however, the extent of their impact on gross margins is uncertain.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses consist of marketing, sales, commissions, engineering, product development, management information systems, accounting, headquarters and non-cash share-based employee compensation expenses.
SG&A expenses for the third quarter 2010 were approximately $3.0 million (42.6% of sales) compared with approximately $2.7 million (32.8% of sales) for the same quarter last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, SG&A expenses totaled approximately $8.8 million (42.8% of sales) compared with approximately $7.8 million (35.2% of sales) for the same period last year.
Engineering and product development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased approximately $267,000 (30.4%) compared with the same quarter last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, engineering and product development expenses increased approximately $571,000 (20.9%) compared with the same period last year. During the first nine months of 2010 we incurred additional costs primarily associated with our KNG P25 engineering and new product development initiatives. In September 2010, we completed the first release of P25 trunking, and introduced the initial models of P25 trunked portable and mobile radios. New products and capabilities in our KNG line are in the pipeline and planned for introduction in coming quarters.
Marketing and selling expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased by approximately $42,000 (4.0%) compared with the same quarter last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, marketing and selling expenses increased approximately $285,000 (9.5%) compared with the same period last year. During the first nine months of 2010 we increased sales and marketing programs primarily related to our new KNG products. These programs are designed to raise the profile of the Company and its products, as we enter new markets and pursue new customers. Also, for the same period last year we maintained lower selling expenses and payroll in response to sluggish sales. We intend to invest in selling and marketing initiatives that we believe will support our goals for sales growth.
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased by approximately $24,000 (3.0%), compared with the same quarter last year primarily as a result of reduced headquarters and public company expenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $152,000 (7.3%) compared with the same period last year primarily as a result of non-cash share-based employee compensation expenses.
Operating Income
Operating income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled approximately $269,000 (3.8% of sales) and $826,000 (4.0% of sales), respectively, compared with approximately $1.5 million (18.3% of sales) and $2.9 million (13.3% of sales) for the same periods last year. The decrease in operating income was primarily due to a combination of factors including lower sales, reduced gross margins resulting from pricing and cost changes, and increased operating expenses.
Net Interest Expense
For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, net interest expense totaled approximately $6,000, compared to net interest expense of approximately $5,000 and $41,000, respectively, for the same periods last year. We incur interest expense on outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility and earn interest income on our cash balances. The interest rate on such revolving credit facility as of September 30, 2010 was 3.75%. This rate is variable based on the prime rate plus 50 basis points.
14
Income Taxes
We recorded net income tax expense of approximately $134,000 and $344,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared with $577,000 and $881,000 for the same periods last year. Our income tax expense is primarily non-cash as we have the availability of net operating loss carryforwards.
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had deferred tax assets of approximately $7.5 million and $7.8 million, respectively. These assets are primarily composed of net operating loss carry forwards (NOLs), which are available to offset certain federal and state taxable income. The NOLs expire starting in 2018 through 2028.
In order to fully realize the net deferred tax assets, we will need to generate sufficient taxable income in future years to utilize our NOLs prior to their expiration. ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” requires us to analyze all positive and negative evidence to determine if, based on the weight of available evidence, we are more likely than not to realize the benefit of the net deferred tax assets. The recognition of the net deferred tax assets and related tax benefits is based upon our conclusions regarding, among other considerations, estimates of future earnings based on information currently available, current and anticipated customers, contracts and product introductions, as well as historical operating results, and certain tax planning strategies.
We have evaluated the available evidence and the likelihood of realizing the benefit of our net deferred tax assets. From our evaluation we have concluded that based on the weight of available evidence we are more likely than not to realize the benefit of our net deferred tax assets recorded at September 30, 2010. Accordingly, no valuation allowance has been established. We cannot presently estimate what, if any, changes to the valuation of our deferred tax assets may be deemed appropriate in the future. If we incur future losses, it may be necessary to record a valuation allowance related to the deferred tax assets recorded as of September 30, 2010.
In April 2010, we were notified by the Internal Revenue Service of its intent to examine our federal tax return for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The examination has commenced with an anticipated completion date of December 2010.
Changing Prices
In some instances during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, product unit prices were reduced to enhance our competitive position and sales prospects, which reduced gross margins. We anticipate that competitive pricing pressure will continue in future quarters. The extent of their impact is uncertain.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net cash used in operating activities totaled approximately $1.9 million compared with net cash provided by operating activities of approximately $5.6 million for the same period last year. Cash used in operating activities resulted from approximately $1.5 million of less net income than in the same period last year, as well as changes in inventories, accounts receivable and accounts payable. Net inventories increased during the period by approximately $3.8 million to support the broader line of new products and anticipated demand. For the same period last year, inventory decreased approximately $3.7 million primarily due to product sales from a substantial order with the U.S. Department of Defense. Accounts receivable increased approximately $0.7 million compared with an increase of approximately $2.4 million for the same period last year. The increase in accounts receivable as of September 30, 2010 was primarily the result of sales near the end of the third quarter that are still in their collection cycle. Accounts payable increased as of September 30, 2010 by approximately $1.1 million primarily due to material purchases. For the same period last year, accounts payable decreased by approximately $0.1 million. Deferred tax assets for the first nine months of 2010 decreased by approximately $342,000 compared with $855,000 for the same period last year. Depreciation and amortization totaled approximately $486,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared with $503,000 for the same period last year.
15
Cash used in investing activities was primarily to fund digital software development and the acquisition of assets pertaining to the development of our new digital products. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and during the same period last year, we incurred approximately $1.1 million in capitalized software costs. Purchases of property, plant and equipment for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were approximately $439,000 compared with approximately $341,000 for the same period last year. We anticipate that future capital expenditures will be funded through our existing cash balance and operating cash flow.
Cash generated from financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled approximately $2.1 million, representing $2.0 million in borrowings under our revolving credit facility, $79,000 in proceeds from the issuance of common stock and $20,000 in tax benefits from the exercise and sale of employees’ stock options. For the same period last year, cash used in financing activities totaled $1.5 million, as we repaid borrowings under our secured revolving credit facility.
On October 20, 2010, we amended our revolving credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) by amending the related loan and security agreement. Under the amended loan and security agreement, our revolving credit facility’s maximum borrowing availability has been increased to $5.0 million from $3.5 million, its maturity date has been extended to December 31, 2012 from October 23, 2010, the variable rate at which borrowings bear interest has been reduced to prime rate plus 50 basis points from prime rate plus 100 basis points and the Company’s minimum “tangible net worth” requirement has been reset at $25.35 million (such minimum requirement still continuing to be subject to increase by (i) 50% of quarterly net profits and (ii) 75% of the net proceeds received from issuances of equity and issuances of “subordinated debt”).
We continue to be subject to the substantially same customary borrowing terms and conditions under the SVB credit facility as we were prior to amending the loan and security agreement, including the accuracy of representations and warranties, compliance with financial maintenance and restrictive covenants and the absence of events of default.
The foregoing description of our SVB credit facility and the amended loan and security agreement is qualified by reference to Note 10 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report.
We were in compliance with all covenants under the amended loan and security agreement, as of the date of this report. As of the date of this report, borrowings outstanding under the SVB credit facility totaled $2.0 million and we had approximately $0.6 million of additional borrowing availability.
Our cash balance at September 30, 2010 was approximately $6.3 million. We believe these funds combined with anticipated cash generated from operations and borrowing availability under our credit facility with SVB are sufficient to meet our working capital requirements for the next twelve months. However, although we do not anticipate needing additional capital in the near term, the current financial and economic conditions could limit our access to credit and impair our ability to raise capital, if needed, on acceptable terms or at all. We also face other risks that could impact our business, liquidity and financial condition. For a description of these risks, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Critical Accounting Policies
In response to the SEC’s financial reporting release, FR-60, Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies, we have selected for disclosure our revenue recognition process and our accounting processes involving significant judgments, estimates and assumptions. These processes affect our reported revenues and current assets and are therefore critical in assessing our financial and operating status. We regularly evaluate these processes in preparing our financial statements. The processes for determining the allowance for collection of trade receivables, the reserves for excess or obsolete inventory, and software cost and income taxes involve certain assumptions and estimates that we believe to be reasonable under present facts and circumstances. These estimates and assumptions, if incorrect, could adversely impact our operations and financial position. Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 includes a detailed discussion of these critical accounting policies.
16
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We may be subject to the risk of fluctuating interest rates in the ordinary course of business for borrowings under our revolving credit facility, which bears interest at a variable rate based on the prime rate, in effect from time to time, plus 50 basis points. As of September 30, 2010, borrowings outstanding under the facility totaled $2.0 million.
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (who serves as our principal financial and accounting officer) have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of September 30, 2010. Based on this evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2010.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the third quarter ended September 30, 2010, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
17
PART II- OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Reference is made to Note 9 of the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report for the information required by this Item.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit 31.1
|
Certification Pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
Certification Pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K).
|
Exhibit 32.2
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K).
|
18
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION
|
|||
(The “Registrant”)
|
|||
Date: November 10, 2010
|
By: |
/s/ David P. Storey
|
|
David P. Storey
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer and duly authorized officer)
|
|||
Date: November 10, 2010
|
By: |
/s/ William P. Kelly
|
|
William P. Kelly
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal financial and accounting
officer and duly authorized officer)
|
19
Exhibit Index
Exhibit Number
|
Description
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
||
Certification Pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
||
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K).
|
||
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K).
|
20