Annual Statements Open main menu

BK Technologies Corp - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)

rwc_10q.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 
FORM 10-Q
 
S QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
 
OR
 
£  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
 
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from _________  to _________
 
Commission file number 000-07336
 
RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada
 
59-3486297
State or other jurisdiction of
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or organization
 
Identification No.)

7100 Technology Drive
West Melbourne, Florida  32904
(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (321) 984-1414
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes R   No £
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes £  No £
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
þ
Smaller reporting company
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes £   No R
 
There were 13,489,815 shares of common stock, $0.60 par value, of the registrant outstanding at July 23, 2010.
 


 
 

 
PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)(Unaudited)
 
   
June 30,
2010
   
December 31,
2009
 
       
ASSETS:      
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 7,301     $ 7,660  
Trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful
               
accounts of $44 at June 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009, respectively)
    3,131       3,767  
Inventories, net
    8,388       6,623  
Deferred tax assets, net
    1,410       1,611  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    889       896  
Total current assets
    21,119       20,557  
                 
Property, plant and equipment, net
    1,332       1,306  
Deferred tax assets, net
    6,203       6,183  
Capitalized software, net
    3,695       3,024  
Other assets
    312       351  
Total assets
  $ 32,661     $ 31,421  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 1,798     $ 1,250  
Accrued compensation and related taxes
    889       1,086  
Accrued warranty expense
    375       228  
Accrued other expenses and other current liabilities
    318       195  
Total current liabilities     3,380       2,759   
                 
Commitments and contingencies
               
Stockholders' equity:
               
Preferred stock; $1.00 par value; 1,000,000 authorized shares:
               
none issued or outstanding
           
Common stock; $.60 par value; 20,000,000 authorized shares:
               
13,489,815 and 13,416,127 issued and outstanding shares at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
    8,094       8,050  
Additional paid-in capital
    24,306       24,071  
Accumulated deficit
    (3,119 )     (3,459 )
Total stockholders' equity
    29,281       28,662  
                 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
  $ 32,661     $ 31,421  
 
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 
1

 
RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited)
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
2010
   
June 30,
2009
   
June 30,
2010
   
June 30,
2009
 
                         
Sales, net
  $ 7,079     $ 9,876     $ 13,527     $ 13,849  
Expenses
                               
Cost of products
    3,678       4,982       7,162       7,341  
Selling, general and administrative
    2,858       2,618       5,808       5,085  
Total expenses
    6,536       7,600       12,970       12,426  
                                 
Operating income
    543       2,276       557       1,423  
                                 
Other income (expense):
                               
Net interest expense
          (20 )           (36 )
Other income (expense)
    6       1       (6 )     3  
Total other income (expense)
    6       (19 )     (6 )     (33 )
                                 
Income before income tax benefit
    549       2,257       551       1,390  
                                 
Income tax expense
    (210 )     (303 )     (211 )     (303 )
                                 
Net income
  $ 339     $ 1,954     $ 340     $ 1,087  
                                 
Net earnings per share-basic:
  $ 0.03     $ 0.15     $ 0.03     $ 0.08  
Net earnings per share-diluted:
  $ 0.02     $ 0.15     $ 0.02     $ 0.08  
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic
    13,489,485       13,410,871       13,463,256       13,410,871  
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted
    13,870,397       13,430,539       13,872,182       13,414,340  
                                 
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 
2

 
RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
 
   
Six months Ended
 
   
June 30,
2010
   
June 30,
2009
 
             
Operating activities
           
Net income
  $ 340     $ 1,087  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
               
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    7       (36 )
Inventories reserve
    167       (182 )
       Deferred tax asset
    201       329  
Depreciation and amortization
    317       332  
       Shared-based compensation expense
    180       31  
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
    (20 )      
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    629       (3,801 )
Inventories
    (1,932 )     2,938  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    7       569  
Other assets
    39       (49 )
Accounts payable
    548       276  
Accrued compensation and related taxes
    (197 )     445  
Accrued warranty expense
    147       (60 )
Accrued other expenses and other current liabilities
    123       97  
Net cash  provided by operating activities
    556       1,976  
                 
Investing activities
               
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
    (226 )     (320 )
Capitalized software
    (788 )     (938 )
Net cash used in investing activities
    (1,014 )     (1,258 )
                 
Financing activities
               
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    79        
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
    20        
Net decrease in revolving credit line
          (1,000 )
Cash provided by (used in)  financing activities
    99       (1,000 )
                 
                 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    (359 )     (282 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    7,660       5,475  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 7,301     $ 5,193  
                 
Supplemental disclosure
               
Cash paid for interest
  $     $ 40  
Cash paid for income tax
  $ 11     $  
                 
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 
3

 
 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(in Thousands, Except Share Data and Percentages)
 
1.   Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
 
The condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 have been prepared by RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company), and are unaudited.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation have been made.  The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements at that date.
 
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted.  It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for a full year.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standard Board  (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU 2009-14) which amended the accounting requirements under the Software Topic, ASC 985-605 Revenue Recognition. The objective of this update is to address the accounting for revenue arrangements that contain tangible products and software. Specifically, products that contain software that is “more than incidental” to the product as a whole will be removed from the scope of  Accounting Standard Codification  (ASC) subtopic 985-605 (previously AICPA Statement of Position 97-2). The amendments align the accounting for these revenue transaction types with the amendments under ASU 2009-13. The guidance provided within ASU 2009-14 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and allows for either prospective or retrospective application, with early adoption permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU2009-13, Revenue Recognition – Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements.  ASU 2009-13 updates the existing multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance currently included in ASC 605-25.  The revised guidance provides for two significant changes to the existing multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance.  The first change relates to the determination of when the individual deliverables included in a multiple-element arrangement may be treated as separate units of accounting.  This change will result in the requirement to separate more deliverables within an arrangement, ultimately leading to less revenue deferral.  The second change modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across the separately identified deliverables.  Together, these changes will result in earlier recognition of revenue and related costs for multiple-element arrangements than under previous guidance.  This guidance expands the disclosures required for multiple-element revenue arrangements and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2010.  The Company is currently evaluating the potential future impact, if any, of this guidance on its financial statements.
 
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU  2010-06, which requires new fair value disclosures pertaining to significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for the transfers and activity. For Level 3 fair value measurements, purchases, sales, issuances and settlements must be reported on a gross basis. Further, additional disclosures are required by class of assets or liabilities, as well as inputs used to measure fair value and valuation techniques. ASU  2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company’s adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 
4

 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(in Thousands, Except Share Data and Percentages)
 
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU  2010-09, which amends subsequent event disclosure requirements for SEC filers. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This ASU was effective upon issuance and the Company’s adoption of this ASU did not result in a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

2.   Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
The allowance for doubtful accounts on trade receivables was approximately $44 on gross trade receivables of $3,175 and $3,811 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.  This allowance is used to state trade receivables at a net realizable value or the amount that the Company estimates will be collected of the Company’s gross receivables.
 
3.    Inventories, net
 
The components of inventory, net of reserves for slow-moving, excess or obsolete inventory, consist of the following:
 
   
June 30, 2010
   
December 31, 2009
 
Finished goods
  $ 2,064     $ 1,879  
Work in process
    3,264       2,172  
Raw materials
    3,060       2,572  
    $ 8,388     $ 6,623  

Reserves for slow-moving, excess, or obsolete inventory were approximately $2,513 at June 30, 2010, compared with approximately $2,346 at December 31, 2009. The reserve for slow-moving, excess, or obsolete inventory is used to state the Company’s inventories at the lower of cost or market.
 
4.    Income Taxes
 
Net income tax expense totaling approximately $210 and $211 has been recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
 
As of June 30, 2010, the Company’s deferred tax assets totaled approximately $7,613, compared with $7,794 as of December 31, 2009, and are primarily composed of net operating loss carry forwards (NOLs).  These NOLs are available to offset certain Federal or state taxable income and expire starting in 2018 through 2028.
 
In order to fully realize the net deferred tax assets, the Company will need to generate sufficient taxable income in future years to utilize its NOLs prior to their expiration. ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes” requires the Company to analyze all positive and negative evidence to determine if, based on the weight of available evidence, the Company is more likely than not to realize the benefit of the net deferred tax assets. The recognition of the net deferred tax assets and related tax benefit is based upon the Company’s conclusions regarding, among other considerations, estimates of future earnings based on information currently available, current and anticipated customers, contracts and product introductions, as well as historical operating results and certain tax planning strategies.
 
The Company has evaluated the available evidence and the likelihood of realizing the benefit of its net deferred tax assets. From its evaluation, the Company has concluded that based on the weight of available evidence the Company is more likely than not to realize the benefit of its net deferred tax assets recorded at June 30, 2010. Accordingly, no valuation allowance has been established.  The Company cannot presently estimate what, if any, changes to the valuation of its deferred tax assets may be deemed appropriate in the future.  If the Company incurs future losses, it may be necessary to record a valuation allowance related to the deferred tax assets recorded as of June 30, 2010.
 
 
5

 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(in Thousands, Except Share Data and Percentages)
 
In April 2010, the Company was notified by the Internal Revenue Service of its intent to examine the Company’s federal tax return for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.  The examination has commenced with an anticipated completion date of December 2010.
 
5.    Capitalized Software
 
The Company accounts for the costs of software within its products in accordance with ASC Topic 985-20 “Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed”, under which certain software costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility are capitalized and amortized over the estimated lives of the related products. The Company determines technological feasibility to be established upon the internal release of a detailed program design as specified by Topic 985-20. Upon the general release of the product to customers, development costs for that product are amortized over periods not exceeding five years, based on current and future revenue of the product. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company’s amortization cost was $58 and $117 respectively, compared with $58 and $116 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.  Net capitalized software costs totaled $3,695 and $3,024 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
 
6.    Stockholders’ Equity
 
The changes in consolidated stockholders’ equity for the six months ended June 30, 2010 are as follows:
 
   
Common Stock Shares
   
Common Stock Amount
   
Additional Paid-In Capital
   
Accumulated Deficit
   
Total
 
                               
Balance at December 31, 2009
    13,416,127     $ 8,050     $ 24,071     $ (3,459 )   $ 28,662  
Common stock option exercise and issued
    73,688       44       35             79  
Excess tax benefit from share- based compensation
                20             20  
Share-based compensation
   expense
                180             180  
Net income
                      340       340  
Balance at June 30, 2010
    13,489,815     $ 8,094     $ 24,306     $ (3,119 )   $ 29,281  

 
6

 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(in Thousands, Except Share Data and Percentages)
 
7.    Income per Share
 
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income per share:
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30, 2010
   
June 30, 2009
   
June 30, 2010
   
June 30, 2009
 
Numerator:
                       
Net  income  (numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share)
  $ 339     $ 1,954     $ 340     $ 1,087  
Denominator:
                               
Denominator for basic earnings per share weighted average shares
    13,489,485       13,410,871       13,463,256       13,410,871  
                                 
Effect of dilutive securities:
                               
       Options
    380,912       19,668       408,926       3,469  
                                 
Denominator
                               
Denominator for diluted earnings per share weighted average shares
    13,870,397       13,430,539       13,872,182       13,414,340  
 
                               
                                 
Basic income per share
  $ 0.03     $ 0.15     $ 0.03     $ 0.08  
Diluted income per share
  $ 0.02     $ 0.15     $ 0.02     $ 0.08  


8.    Non-Cash Share-Based Employee Compensation
 
The Company has employee and non-employee director stock option programs.  Related to these programs, and in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”, the Company recorded $48 and $180 of non-cash share-based employee compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 respectively, compared with $16 and $31 for the same periods last year.  The Company considers its non-cash share-based employee compensation expenses as a component of cost of products ($4 and $18 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 respectively, compared with $0 for the same periods last year) and selling, general and administrative expenses ($44 and $162 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 respectively, compared with $16 and $31 for the same periods last year).  There was no non-cash share–based employee compensation expense capitalized as part of capital expenditures or inventory for the periods presented.
 
The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model to calculate the fair value of a stock option grant.  The non-cash share-based employee compensation expense recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was calculated using the assumptions noted in the following table.  Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the period of time commensurate with the expected life of the stock options.  The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that the Company presently has no intention to pay cash dividends in the future and the Company is prohibited from doing so under its current secured revolving credit facility.    The Company has estimated future stock option exercises by the optionees.  The expected term of option grants is based upon the observed and expected time to the date of post vesting exercises and forfeitures of options by the optionees.  The risk-free interest rate is derived from the average U.S. Treasury rate for the periods, which approximates the rate at the time of the stock option grant.
 
 
7

 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(in Thousands, Except Share Data and Percentages)

 
   
Three months ended
June 30, 2010
 
       
Expected Term in Years
    3.0-6.5  
Expected Volatility
    76.6% -83.7 %
Risk-Free Rate
    2.54 %
Expected Dividends
    0.00  

A summary of stock option activity under the Company’s stock option plans as of June 30, 2010, and changes during the three months ended June 30, 2010 are presented below:
 
As of April 1, 2010
 
Stock Options
   
Wgt. Avg. Exercise
Price ($)
   
Wgt. Avg. Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
   
Wgt. Avg. Grant Date Fair Value($)
   
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value ($)
 
                               
Outstanding
    1,036,224       2.64             1.75        
Vested
    856,223       2.62             1.74        
Nonvested
    180,001       2.73             1.78        
                                         
Period activity
                                       
Issued
    30,000       2.55             1.38        
Exercised
    5,000       2.10             0.81        
Forfeited
                             
Expired
                             
                                         
As of June 30, 2010
                                       
Outstanding
    1,061,224       2.64       3.96       1.74       596,430  
Vested
    906,222       2.57       3.21       1.68       560,512  
Nonvested
    155,002       3.03       8.34       2.08       35,918  


9.    Commitments and Contingencies
 
Legal Proceedings
 
From time to time the Company may be involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of its business. There were no pending material claims or legal matters as of June 30, 2010.
 
Other
 
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had commitments for purchase orders to suppliers of approximately $5,492.
 
Significant Customers
 
Sales to United States government agencies represented approximately $4,645 (65.6%) and $9,302 (68.8%) of the Company’s total sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 respectively, compared with approximately $7,300 (72.6%) and $8,300 (58.8%) for the same periods last year.  Accounts receivable from agencies of the United States government were approximately $1,596 as of June 30, 2010 compared with approximately $4,183 at the end of the same period last year.
 

 
8

 
ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
SPECIAL NOTE CONCERNING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
We believe that it is important to communicate our future expectations to our security holders and to the public.  This report, therefore, contains statements about future events and expectations which are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Sections 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including the statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and prospects under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”  You can expect to identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “might,” “could,” “would,” ”will,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “expect,” “intend,” “seek” and other similar expressions.  Any statement contained in this report that is not a statement of historical fact may be deemed to be a forward-looking statement.  Although we believe that the plans, objectives, expectations and prospects reflected in or suggested by our forward-looking statements are reasonable, those statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that our plans, objectives, expectations and prospects will be achieved.
 
Important factors that might cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements are contained in the “Risk Factors” section of and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and in our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and include, among others, the following:
 
 
changes in customer preferences;
 
our inventory and debt levels;
 
heavy reliance on sales to agencies of the United States government;
 
federal, state and local government budget deficits and spending limitations;
 
quality of management, business abilities and judgment of our personnel;
 
the availability, terms and deployment of capital;
 
competition in the land mobile radio industry;
 
reliance on contract manufacturers;
 
limitations in available radio spectrum for use of land mobile radios;
 
changes or advances in technology; and
 
general economic and business conditions.
 
We assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made in this report, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions or otherwise, after the date of this report.  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
 
Reported dollar amounts in management’s discussion and analysis are disclosed in millions or as whole dollar amounts.
 
Executive Summary
 
Our financial and operating results for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010 declined as compared with the same periods last year.
 
Sales of P25 digital products for the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased as compared with the same period last year and were approximately the same when compared to the first quarter 2010.  For the six months ended June 30 2010, sales of P25 digital products increased as compared with the same period last year.
 
 
9

 
Our cash and cash equivalents increased during the second quarter 2010 and we maintained a strong working capital position while remaining long-term debt-free as of June 30, 2010.
 
The remainder of a previously announced order from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service received in the first quarter 2010 contributed to our sales and earnings for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010.  We also continued to progress with our P25 Trunking development with successful tests on P25 trunking systems in several states.
 
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, total sales were approximately $7.1 million and $13.5 million respectively, compared with $9.9 million and $13.8 million for the same periods last year.  Sales of P25 digital products for the second quarter 2010 totaled approximately $4.4 million (62.5% of total sales) compared with approximately $6.3 million (63.4% of total sales) for the same quarter last year.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, sales of P25 digital products totaled approximately $8.9 million (65.8% of total sales) compared with approximately $8.1 million (58.2% of total sales) for the same period last year.
 
Gross margins as a percentage of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2010 were 48.1% compared with 49.6% for the same quarter last year.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010 gross margins were approximately 47.1% compared with 47.0% for the same period last year.  Our gross margins for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 reflect competitive pricing pressures and additional manufacturing costs.
 
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, selling, general and administrative expenses totaled approximately $2.9 million (40.4% of sales) compared with approximately $2.6 million (26.5% of sales) the same period last year and compared with approximately $3.0 million for the first quarter 2010.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, selling, general and administrative expenses totaled approximately $5.8 million (42.9% of sales) compared with approximately $5.1 million (36.7% of sales) the same period last year.  Increases from the same periods last year reflect additional marketing and sales costs, as well as product development initiatives.
 
Pretax income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 totaled approximately $549,000 and $551,000 respectively, compared with approximately $2.3 million and $1.4 million for the same periods last year.
 
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized income tax expense, which was primarily non-cash, of approximately $210,000 and $211,000 respectively, compared with approximately $303,000 for the same periods last year.
 
Net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was approximately $339,000 ($0.03 per basic share and $0.02 per diluted share) and $340,000 ($0.03 per basic and diluted share), compared with approximately $2.0 million ($0.15 per basic and diluted share) and $1.1 million ($0.08 per basic and diluted share) for the same periods last year.
 
As of June 30, 2010, working capital was largely unchanged from December 31, 2009, totaling  approximately $17.7 million, of which $10.4 million was comprised of cash and trade receivables.  Additionally, we had no indebteness on our revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2010.
 

 
10

 
Results of Operations
 
As an aid to understanding our operating results for the periods covered by this report, the following table shows selected items from our condensed consolidated statements of income expressed as a percentage of sales:
 
   
Percentage of Sales
Three Months Ended
   
Percentage of Sales
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
2010
   
June 30,
2009
   
June 30,
2010
   
June 30,
2009
 
                         
Sales
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of products
    (51.9 )     (50.4 )     (52.9 )     (53.0 )
Gross margin
    48.1       49.6       47.1       47.0  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    (40.4 )     (26.5 )     (42.9 )     (36.7 )
Net interest (expense) income
    0.0       (0.2 )     0.0       (0.3 )
Other income
    0.1       0.0       0.0       0.0  
Pretax  income
    7.8       22.9       4.2       10.0  
Income tax expense
    (3.0 )     (3.1 )     (1.6 )     (2.2 )
Net income
    4.8 %     19.8 %     2.6 %     7.8 %

Net Sales
 
Net sales for the second quarter ended June 30, 2010, totaled approximately $7.1 million compared with approximately $9.9 million for the same quarter last year.  Sales of P25 digital products for the quarter totaled approximately $4.4 million (62.5% of total sales), compared with approximately $6.3 million (63.4% of total sales) for the same quarter last year.
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, total sales were approximately $13.5 million, compared with approximately $13.8 million for the same period last year.  Sales of P25 digital products for the six-month period comprised approximately $8.9 million (65.8% of total sales) compared with approximately $8.1 million (58.2% of total sales) for the same period last year.
 
The remainder of a previously announced order from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service received during the first quarter 2010 was shipped and contributed to our sales for the second quarter.  The order was primarily for our D-Series P25 digital portable and mobile radios with accessories.  This large purchase demonstrates the importance of our long-term customers and legacy products in our continued success.  Sales for the second quarter represented a 10% increase from the first quarter 2010.  Compared with the same quarter last year, sales declined approximately 28.3%.  During last year’s second quarter we benefited from a significant order from the U.S. Department of Defense.
 
Meaningful progress has continued in the development of our P25 trunking products and capabilities, which we anticipate should be commercially available later this year.  In addition to first quarter trunking demonstrations and testing, we have completed tests on P25 trunking systems in several state public safety agencies.
 
Cost of Products and Gross Margin
 
Gross margins as a percentage of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2010 were 48.1% compared with 49.6% for the same quarter last year.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, gross margins as a percentage of sales were 47.1% compared with 47.0% for the same period last year.
 
Our cost of products and gross margins are primarily related to product mix, manufacturing volumes and pricing.  Compared with the same quarter last year, our gross margins for the quarter reflected the impact of manufacturing costs and competitive pricing pressures, as well as a change in the mix of products sold.  Some of the manufacturing costs were limited to the circumstances of the first quarter 2010.  Consequently, gross margins as a percentage of sales for the second quarter 2010 improved approximately 200 basis points  from the first quarter 2010.
 
 
11

 
We continue to utilize contract manufacturing relationships to maximize production efficiencies and minimize material and labor costs.  We also regularly consider manufacturing alternatives to improve quality, speed and to reduce our product costs.  We anticipate that the current contract manufacturing relationships or comparable alternatives will be available to us in the future.  Leveraging increased sales volumes and P-25 product sales combined with the introduction of planned new products, we believe, should result in further cost improvements and   efficiencies.  We anticipate that product cost and competitive pricing pressures will continue in future quarters, however, the extent of their impact on gross margins is uncertain.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses consist of marketing, sales, commissions, engineering, product development, management information systems, accounting, headquarters and non-cash share-based employee compensation expenses.
 
SG&A expenses for the second quarter 2010 were approximately $2.9 million (40.4% of sales) compared with approximately $2.6 million (26.5% of sales) for the same quarter last year, and compared with $3.0 million (45.7% of sales) for the first quarter 2010.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, SG&A expenses totaled approximately $5.8 million (42.9% of sales) compared with approximately $5.1 million (36.7% of sales) for the same period last year.
 
Engineering and product development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased approximately $118,000 (12.3%) compared with the same quarter last year.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, engineering and product development expenses increased approximately $304,000 (16.4%) compared with the same period last year.  During the first six months of 2010 we incurred additional costs primarily associated with our P25 mobile, and other engineering and new product development initiatives.  New products and capabilities in our KNG line, including a P25 mobile radio and P25 trunking, are in the pipeline and planned for introduction later this year.
 
Marketing and selling expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased by approximately $82,000 (8.4%) compared with the same quarter last year.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, marketing and selling expenses increased approximately $242,000 (12.5%) compared with the same period last year.  During the first six months of 2010 we increased sales and marketing programs designed to raise the profile of the Company and products, and to enter new markets and customers.  Also, for the same period last year we maintained lower selling expenses and payroll in response to sluggish sales.  We intend to invest in selling and marketing initiatives that we believe will support our goals for sales growth.
 
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased by approximately $40,000 (5.8%), compared with the same quarter last year.   For the six months ended June 30, 2010, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $177,000 (13.7%) compared with the same period last year.  These increases were primarily the result of non-cash share-based employee compensation and other headquarters and public company related expenses.
 
Operating Income
 
Operating income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 totaled approximately $543,000 (7.7% of sales) and $557,000 (4.1% of sales) respectively, compared with $2.3 million (23.0% of sales) and $1.4 million (10.3% of sales) for the same periods last year.  The decrease in operating income was primarily due to a combination of factors including lower sales, reduced gross margins resulting from pricing and cost changes, and increased operating expenses.
 
 
12

 
 
Net Interest Expense
 
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we incurred no interest expense or income, compared to net interest expense of approximately $20,000 and $36,000 respectively, for the same periods last year.  We incur interest expense on outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility and earn interest income on our cash balances.  During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we had no borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility.  The interest rate on such revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2010 was 5.5%.  This rate is variable based on the prime rate plus 100 basis points (subject to a reduction of 50 basis points anytime our quarterly net income is greater than $1.0 million).
 
Income Taxes
 
We recorded net income tax expense of approximately $210,000 and $211,000 respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared with $303,000 for the same periods last year.  Our income tax expense is primarily non-cash as we have the availability of net operating loss carryforward.
 
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had deferred tax assets of approximately $7.6 million and $7.8 million respectively.  These assets are primarily composed of net operating loss carry forwards (NOLs), which are available to offset certain federal and state taxable income.  The NOLs expire starting in 2018 through 2028.  
 
In order to fully realize the net deferred tax assets, we will need to generate sufficient taxable income in future years to utilize our NOLs prior to their expiration.  ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” requires us to analyze all positive and negative evidence to determine if, based on the weight of available evidence, we are more likely than not to realize the benefit of the net deferred tax assets. The recognition of the net deferred tax assets and related tax benefits is based upon our conclusions regarding, among other considerations, estimates of future earnings based on information currently available, current and anticipated customers, contracts and product introductions, as well as  historical operating results, and certain tax planning strategies.
 
We have evaluated the available evidence and the likelihood of realizing the benefit of our net deferred tax assets.  From our evaluation we have concluded that based on the weight of available evidence we are more likely than not to realize the benefit of our net deferred tax assets recorded at June 30, 2010.  Accordingly, no valuation allowance has been established.  We cannot presently estimate what, if any, changes to the valuation of our deferred tax assets may be deemed appropriate in the future.  If we incur future losses, it may be necessary to record a valuation allowance related to the deferred tax assets recorded as of June 30, 2010.
 
In April 2010, we were notified by the Internal Revenue Service of its intent to examine our federal tax return for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.  The examination has commenced with an anticipated completion date of December 2010.
 
Changing Prices
 
 In some instances during the periods, product unit prices were reduced to enhance our competitive position and sales prospects, which unfavorably impacted gross margins.  We anticipate that competitive pricing pressure will continue in future quarters.  The extent of their impact is uncertain.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, net cash provided by operating activities totaled approximately $556,000 compared with approximately $2.0 million for the same period last year.  Cash provided by operating activities resulted from net income of approximately $340,000 compared with approximately $1.1 million for the same period last year, as well as changes in accounts receivable, accounts payable and inventories.  Accounts receivable decreased $0.6 million compared with an increase of $3.8 million for the same period last year.  The decrease in accounts receivable as of June 30, 2010 was primarily the result of collections during the period.  Accounts payable increased as of June 30, 2010 by approximately $0.5 million primarily due to material purchases.  For the same period last year, accounts payable increased approximately $0.3 million.  Net inventories increased during the period by approximately $1.9 million to support anticipated demand during the third quarter 2010.  For the same period last year, inventory decreased approximately $2.9 million primarily from product sales from a substantial order with the U.S. Department of Defense.  Deferred tax assets for the first six months of 2010 decreased approximately $201,000 compared with $329,000 for the same period last year.  Depreciation and amortization totaled approximately $317,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared with $332,000 for the same period last year.
 
 
13

 
Cash used in investing activities was primarily to fund digital software development and the acquisition of assets pertaining to the development of our new digital products.  During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we incurred $788,000 in capitalized software costs compared with $938,000 for the same period last year.  Purchases of property, plant and equipment for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were approximately $226,000 compared with approximately $320,000 for the same period last year.  We anticipate that future capital expenditures will be funded through our existing cash balance and operating cash flow.
 
Cash generated from financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 totaled approximately $99,000, representing  $79,000 in proceeds from the issuance of common stock and $20,000 in tax benefits from the exercise and sale of employees’ stock options.  For the same period last year, cash used in financing activities totaled $1.0 million, as we reduced borrowing under our secured revolving credit facility by that amount.
 
We have a secured revolving credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). The SVB facility provides borrowing availability of up to $3.5 million and is governed by a loan and security agreement entered into between us and SVB. The facility is available on a revolving basis during the period that commenced on October 23, 2008 and ending on October 22, 2010. Under the terms and conditions of the loan and security agreement for the facility, advances are generally subject to customary borrowing conditions, including the accuracy of representations and warranties, compliance with financial maintenance and restrictive covenants and the absence of events of default. For additional information about the terms and conditions of the loan and security agreement, reference is made to Note 6 (Debt) of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
 
Advances under the facility bear interest at a variable rate equal to the prime rate, in effect from time to time, plus 100 basis points, subject to a reduction of 50 basis points anytime our quarterly net income is greater than $1.0 million. Under the terms and conditions of the loan and security agreement for the facility, advances may be prepaid in whole or in part without premium or penalty. Under the terms and conditions of the loan and security agreement for the facility, our obligations are secured by substantially all of our assets, principally accounts receivable and inventory. We were in compliance with all covenants under the loan and security agreement as of the date of this report. As of June 30, 2010, we had no borrowings outstanding under the facility and approximately $2.6 million of borrowing availability.
 
Our cash balance at June 30, 2010 was approximately $7.3 million.  We believe these funds combined with anticipated cash generated from operations and borrowing availability under our secured revolving credit facility with SVB are sufficient to meet our working capital requirements for the next twelve months. However, although we do not anticipate needing additional capital in the near term, the current financial and economic conditions could limit our access to credit and impair our ability to raise capital, if needed, on acceptable terms or at all. We also face other risks that could impact our business, liquidity and financial condition. For a description of these risks, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
In response to the SEC’s financial reporting release, FR-60, Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies, we have selected for disclosure our revenue recognition process and our accounting processes involving significant judgments, estimates and assumptions.  These processes affect our reported revenues and current assets and are therefore critical in assessing our financial and operating status.  We regularly evaluate these processes in preparing our financial statements.  The processes for determining the allowance for collection of trade receivables, the reserves for excess or obsolete inventory, and software cost and income taxes involve certain assumptions and estimates that we believe to be reasonable under present facts and circumstances.  These estimates and assumptions, if incorrect, could adversely impact our operations and financial position.  Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 includes a detailed discussion of these critical accounting policies.
 
ITEM 3.   QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
We may be subject to the risk of fluctuating interest rates in the ordinary course of business for borrowings under our revolving credit facility, which bears interest at a variable rate based on the prime rate, in effect from time to time, plus 100 basis points (subject to a reduction of 50 basis points anytime our quarterly net income is greater than $1.0 million).  As of June 30, 2010, we had no borrowings outstanding under the facility.
 
 
14

 
 
ITEM 4T.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (who serves as our principal financial and accounting officer) have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of June 30, 2010.  Based on this evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2010.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
During the second quarter ended June 30, 2010, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 

 
15

 
PART II- OTHER  INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
Reference is made to Note 9 of the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report for the information required by this Item.
 
ITEM 6.   EXHIBITS
 
Exhibit 31.1
Certification Pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
Exhibit 31.2
Certification Pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
Exhibit 32.1
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K).
   
Exhibit 32.2
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K).

 

 
16

 

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
  RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION
(The “Registrant”)
 
       
Date:  August 11, 2010
By:
/s/ David P. Storey  
    David P. Storey  
   
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer and duly authorized officer)
 
       
       
Date:  August 11, 2010
By:
/s/ William P. Kelly  
    William P. Kelly  
   
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal financial and accounting officer and duly authorized officer)
 
       
 

 
17

 
Exhibit Index
 

Exhibit
Number
 
Description
     
     
31.1  
Certification Pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
31.2  
Certification Pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
32.1  
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K).
     
32.2  
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K).

 
 
 
18