BLUE DOLPHIN ENERGY CO - Quarter Report: 2019 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
☒
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31,
2019
or
☐
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from
to
Commission
File No. 0-15905
BLUE DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
73-1268729
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
801 Travis Street, Suite 2100, Houston, Texas
|
|
77002
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
713-568-4725
|
|
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data
File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No
☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting
company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated
filer
|
☐
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
☐
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
☒
|
|
Emerging
growth company
|
☐ |
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No
☒
Number
of shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share outstanding as
of May 16, 2019: 10,975,514
Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each class
|
Trading
Symbol(s)
|
Name of
each exchange on which registered
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock, $0.01 par value
|
BDCO
|
OTCQX
|
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED ENERGY, FINANCIAL, AND OTHER
TERMS
|
4
|
|
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
6
|
|
|
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
6
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
6
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
|
7
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
8
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
9
|
|
|
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
37
|
|
|
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
48
|
|
|
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
48
|
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
49
|
|
|
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
49
|
|
|
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
|
49
|
|
|
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
49
|
|
|
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
49
|
|
|
ITEM
4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
|
50
|
|
|
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
|
50
|
|
|
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
|
50
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
51
|
2
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
INTRODUCTION
This
Quarterly Report for the period ended March 31, 2019 (this
“Quarterly Report”) is a document that U.S. public
companies file with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) every year. Part I, Item 1. of the Quarterly
Report contains financial information, including consolidated
financial statements and related notes. Part I, Item 2. of this
Quarterly Report provides management’s discussion and
analysis of our financial condition and results of operations. We
hope investors will find it useful to have this information in a
single document.
In this
Quarterly Report, “Blue Dolphin,” “we,”
“our,” and “us” are used interchangeably to
refer to Blue Dolphin Energy Company individually or to Blue
Dolphin Energy Company and its subsidiaries collectively, as
appropriate to the context. Information in this Quarterly Report is
current as of the filing date, unless otherwise
specified.
CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In this
Quarterly Report, and from time to time throughout the year, we
share our expectations for our future performance. These
forward-looking statements include statements about our business
plans; our expected financial performance, including the
anticipated effect of strategic actions; previously reported
material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting;
economic, political and market conditions; and other factors that
could affect our future results of operations or financial
condition, including, without limitation, statements under the
section entitled “Part I, Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations,” “Part II, Item 1. Legal
Proceedings,” and “Part II, Item 1A. Risk
Factors.” Any statements we make that are not matters of
current reportage or historical fact should be considered
forward-looking. Such statements often include words such as
“believe,” “expect,”
“anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,”
“estimate,” “will,” and similar
expressions. By their nature, these types of statements are
uncertain and are not guarantees of our future performance. Our
forward-looking statements represent our estimates and expectations
at the time of disclosure. However, circumstances change
constantly, often unpredictably, and investors should not place
undue reliance on these statements. Many events beyond our control
will determine whether our expectations will be realized. We
disclaim any current intention or obligation to revise or update
any forward-looking statements, or the factors that may affect
their realization, whether considering new information, future
events or otherwise, and investors should not rely on us to do
so.
In
accordance with the “safe harbor” provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, “Part I,
Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Annual
Report”), and “Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in
this Quarterly Report explain some of the important factors that
may cause actual results to be materially different from those that
we anticipate.
Remainder
of Page Intentionally Left Blank
3
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Below
are abbreviations and definitions of certain commonly used oil and
gas industry terms, as well as key financial performance measures
used by management, that are used in this Quarterly
Report.
Regarding
financial terms, management uses U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and
certain non-GAAP performance measures to assess our results of
operations. Certain performance measures used by management to
assess our operating results and the effectiveness of our business
segment are considered non-GAAP performance measures. These
performance measures may differ from similar calculations used by
other companies within the petroleum industry, thereby limiting
their usefulness as a comparative measure. We refer to certain
refinery throughput and production data in the explanation of our
period-over-period changes in results of operations. For our
consolidated results, we refer to our consolidated statements of
operations in the explanation of our period-over-period changes in
results of operations.
Energy Terms
Atmospheric gas oil (“AGO”). The heaviest
product boiled by a crude distillation tower operating at
atmospheric pressure. This fraction ordinarily sells as distillate
fuel oil, either in pure form or blended with cracked stocks.
Certain ethylene plants, called heavy oil crackers, can take AGO as
feedstock.
Barrel (“bbl”). A unit of volume equal to 42
U.S. gallons.
Barrels per Day (“bpd”). A measure of the bbls
of daily output produced in a refinery or transported through a
pipeline.
Complexity. A numerical score that denotes, for a given
refinery, the extent, capability, and capital intensity of the
refining processes downstream of the crude distillation tower.
Refinery complexities range from the relatively simple crude
distillation tower (“topping unit”), which has a
complexity of 1.0, to the more complex deep conversion
(“coking”) refineries, which have a complexity of
12.0.
Condensate. Liquid hydrocarbons that are produced in
conjunction with natural gas. Although condensate is sometimes like
crude oil, it is usually lighter.
Crude distillation tower. A tall column-like vessel in which
crude oil and condensate is heated and its vaporized components are
distilled by means of distillation trays. This process turns crude
oil and other inputs into intermediate and finished petroleum
products. (Commonly referred to as a crude distillation unit or an
atmospheric distillation unit.)
Crude oil. A mixture of thousands of chemicals and
compounds, primarily hydrocarbons. Crude oil quality is measured in
terms of density (light to heavy) and sulfur content (sweet to
sour). Crude oil must be broken down into its various components by
distillation before these chemicals and compounds can be used as
fuels or converted to more valuable products.
Depropanizer unit. A distillation column that is used to
isolate propane from a mixture containing butane and other heavy
components.
Distillates. The result of crude distillation and therefore
any refined oil product. Distillate is more commonly used as an
abbreviated form of middle distillate. There are mainly four (4)
types of distillates: (i) very light oils or light distillates
(such as naphtha), (ii) light oils or middle distillates (such as
our jet fuel), (iii) medium oils, and (iv) heavy oils (such as our
low-sulfur diesel and heavy oil-based mud blendstock
(“HOBM”), reduced crude, and AGO).
|
|
Distillation.
The first step in the refining process whereby crude oil and
condensate is heated at atmospheric pressure in the base of a
distillation tower. As the temperature increases, the various
compounds vaporize in succession at their various boiling points
and then rise to prescribed levels within the tower per their
densities, from lightest to heaviest. They then condense in
distillation trays and are drawn off individually for further
refining. Distillation is also used at other points in the refining
process to remove impurities.
Feedstocks.
Crude oil and other hydrocarbons, such as condensate and/or
intermediate products, that are used as basic input materials in a
refining process. Feedstocks are transformed into one or more
finished products.
Finished petroleum
products. Materials or products which have received the
final increments of value through processing operations, and which
are being held in inventory for delivery, sale, or
use.
Intermediate
petroleum products. A petroleum product that might require
further processing before it is saleable to the ultimate consumer.
This further processing might be done by the producer or by another
processor. Thus, an intermediate petroleum product might be a final
product for one company and an input for another company that will
process it further.
Jet fuel. A
high-quality kerosene product primarily used in aviation.
Kerosene-type jet fuel (including Jet A and Jet A-1) has a carbon
number distribution between about 8 and 16 carbon atoms per
molecule; wide-cut or naphtha-type jet fuel (including Jet B) has
between about 5 and 15 carbon atoms per molecule.
Leasehold
interest. The interest of a lessee under an oil and gas
lease.
Light crude.
A liquid petroleum that has a low density and flows freely at room
temperature. It has a low viscosity, low specific gravity, and a
high American Petroleum Institute gravity due to the presence of a
high proportion of light hydrocarbon fractions.
Naphtha. A
refined or partly refined light distillate fraction of crude oil.
Blended further or mixed with other materials it can make
high-grade motor gasoline or jet fuel. It is also a generic term
applied to the lightest and most volatile petroleum
fractions.
Petroleum. A
naturally occurring flammable liquid consisting of a complex
mixture of hydrocarbons of various molecular weights and other
liquid organic compounds. The name petroleum covers both the
naturally occurring unprocessed crude oils and petroleum products
that are made up of refined crude
oil.
|
4
BLUE DOLPHIN ENERGY
COMPANY
|
|
FORM 10-Q
3/31/19
|
Product Slate. Represents type and quality of products
produced.
Propane. A by-product of natural gas processing and
petroleum refining. Propane is one of a group of liquified
petroleum gases. Others include butane, propylene, butadiene,
butylene, isobutylene and mixtures thereof.
Refined petroleum products. Refined petroleum products are
derived from crude oil and condensate that have been processed
through various refining methods. The resulting products include
gasoline, home heating oil, jet fuel, diesel, lubricants and the
raw materials for fertilizer, chemicals, and
pharmaceuticals.
Refinery. Within the oil and gas industry, a refinery is an
industrial processing plant where crude oil and condensate is
separated and transformed into petroleum products.
Sour crude. Crude oil containing sulfur content of more than
0.5%.
Stabilizer unit. A distillation column intended to remove
the lighter boiling compounds, such as butane or propane, from a
product.
Sweet crude. Crude oil containing sulfur content of less
than 0.5%.
|
|
Sulfur.
Present at various levels of concentration in many hydrocarbon
deposits, such as petroleum, coal, or natural gas. Also, produced
as a by-product of removing sulfur-containing contaminants from
natural gas and petroleum. Some of the most commonly used
hydrocarbon deposits are categorized per their sulfur content, with
lower sulfur fuels usually selling at a higher, premium price and
higher sulfur fuels selling at a lower, or discounted,
price.
Topping unit. A type of petroleum refinery that engages in
only the first step of the refining process -- crude distillation.
A topping unit uses atmospheric distillation to separate crude oil
and condensate into constituent petroleum products. A topping unit
has a refinery complexity range of 1.0 to 2.0.
Throughput. The volume processed through a unit or a
refinery or transported through a pipeline.
Turnaround. Scheduled large-scale maintenance activity
wherein an entire process unit is taken offline for a week or more
for comprehensive revamp and renewal.
Yield. The percentage of refined petroleum products that is
produced from crude oil and other feedstocks.
|
Financial and Performance Measures
Capacity Utilization Rate. A percentage measure that
indicates the amount of available capacity that is being used in a
refinery or transported through a pipeline. With respect to the
crude distillation tower, the rate is calculated by dividing total
refinery throughput or total refinery production on a bpd basis by
the total capacity of the crude distillation tower (currently
15,000 bpd).
Cost of Goods Sold. Reflects the cost of crude oil and
condensate, fuel use, and chemicals.
Downtime. Scheduled and/or unscheduled periods in which the
crude distillation tower is not operating. Downtime may occur for a
variety of reasons, including bad weather, power failures, and
preventive maintenance.
Gross Margin. Calculated as
gross profit divided by total revenue; reflected as a percentage
(%).
Gross Profit. Calculated
as total revenue less cost of goods sold; reflected as a dollar ($)
amount.
Operating Days. Represents the number of days in a period in
which the crude distillation tower operated. Operating days is
calculated by subtracting downtime in a period from calendar days
in the same period.
|
|
Other conversion costs. Represents the combination of direct
labor costs and manufacturing overhead costs. These are the costs
that are necessary to convert our raw materials into refined
petroleum products.
Other Operating Expenses. Represents costs associated with
our pipeline assets and leasehold interests in oil and gas
properties.
Refining Gross Profit per Bbl. Calculated as refinery operations revenue
less total cost of goods sold divided by the volume, in bbls, of
refined petroleum products sold during the period; reflected as a
dollar ($) amount per bbl.
Total Refinery Production. Refers to the volume processed as
output through the crude distillation tower. Refinery production
includes finished petroleum products, such as jet fuel, and
intermediate petroleum products, such as naphtha, HOBM and
AGO.
Total Refinery Throughput. Refers to the volume processed as
input through the crude distillation tower. Refinery throughput
includes crude oil and condensate and other
feedstocks.
|
Other Defined Terms
Final Arbitration Award. Damages and attorney fees and related
expenses awarded to GEL Tex Marketing, LLC (“GEL”), an
affiliate of Genesis Energy, L.P. (“Genesis”) by an
arbitrator on August 11, 2017 (the “Final Arbitration
Award”), in arbitration proceedings between LE and GEL (the
“GEL Arbitration”) related to a contractual dispute
involving a Crude Oil Supply and Throughput Services Agreement (the
“Crude Supply Agreement”) and a Joint Marketing
Agreement (the “Joint Marketing Agreement”), each
between LE and GEL and dated August 12, 2011.
|
|
|
5
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
|
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$29
|
$14
|
Restricted
cash
|
49
|
49
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
1,118
|
379
|
Accounts
receivable, related party
|
482
|
-
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
876
|
1,786
|
Deposits
|
194
|
194
|
Inventory
|
1,843
|
1,510
|
Refundable
federal income tax
|
166
|
108
|
Total current assets
|
4,757
|
4,040
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM
ASSETS
|
|
|
Total
property and equipment, net
|
64,256
|
64,697
|
Operating
lease right-of-use assets
|
754
|
-
|
Restricted
cash, noncurrent
|
1,602
|
1,602
|
Surety
bonds
|
230
|
230
|
Deferred
tax assets, net
|
50
|
108
|
Total long-term assets
|
66,892
|
66,637
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$71,649
|
$70,677
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
Long-term
debt less unamortized debt issue costs, current portion, in
default
|
$34,645
|
$34,863
|
Long-term
debt, related party, current portion, in default
|
7,459
|
7,041
|
Interest
payable, in default
|
3,324
|
2,939
|
Interest
payable, related party, in default
|
1,694
|
1,534
|
Accounts
payable
|
2,309
|
2,719
|
Accounts
payable, related party
|
1,680
|
1,529
|
Current
portion of long-term operating leases
|
164
|
-
|
Asset
retirement obligations, current portion
|
2,580
|
2,580
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
1,948
|
1,571
|
Accrued
arbitration award payable
|
19,628
|
21,128
|
Total current liabilities
|
75,431
|
75,904
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
Long-term
operating leases, net of current portion
|
698
|
-
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
698
|
-
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
76,129
|
75,904
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 17)
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS'
DEFICIT
|
|
|
Common
stock ($0.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized;
10,975,514
|
|
|
shares
issued at both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018)
|
110
|
110
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
36,936
|
36,936
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(41,526)
|
(42,273)
|
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
(4,480)
|
(5,227)
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
$71,649
|
$70,677
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
6
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
|
Three Months Ended March
31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in thousands, except
share and per-share amounts)
|
|
REVENUE
FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
Refinery
operations
|
$67,858
|
$71,512
|
Tolling
and terminaling
|
1,069
|
734
|
Total
revenue from operations
|
68,927
|
72,246
|
|
|
|
COST
OF GOODS SOLD
|
|
|
Crude
oil, fuel use, and chemicals
|
63,187
|
68,086
|
Other
conversion costs
|
2,329
|
2,406
|
Total
cost of goods sold
|
65,516
|
70,492
|
|
|
|
Gross
Profit
|
3,411
|
1,754
|
|
|
|
COST
OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
Management
fee
|
150
|
154
|
Other
operating expenses
|
57
|
44
|
General
and administrative expenses
|
670
|
660
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
590
|
455
|
Accretion
of asset retirement obligations
|
-
|
66
|
Total
cost of operations
|
1,467
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
Income
from operations
|
1,944
|
375
|
|
|
|
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
Easement,
interest and other income
|
-
|
1
|
Interest
and other expense
|
(1,197)
|
(744)
|
Total
other income (expense)
|
(1,197)
|
(743)
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
747
|
(368)
|
|
|
|
Income
tax benefit
|
-
|
217
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$747
|
$(151)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) per common share:
|
|
|
Basic
|
$0.07
|
$(0.01)
|
Diluted
|
$0.07
|
$(0.01)
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
Basic
|
10,975,514
|
10,925,513
|
Diluted
|
10,975,514
|
10,925,513
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
7
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$747
|
$(151)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
|
|
|
provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
590
|
455
|
Deferred
income tax
|
-
|
(217)
|
Amortization
of debt issue costs
|
32
|
32
|
Accretion
of asset retirement obligations
|
-
|
66
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
(739)
|
818
|
Accounts
receivable, related party
|
(482)
|
307
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
910
|
(223)
|
Deposits
and other assets
|
-
|
(16)
|
Inventory
|
(333)
|
766
|
Accrued
arbitration award
|
(1,500)
|
(1,500)
|
Accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
593
|
312
|
Accounts
payable, related party
|
151
|
152
|
Net
cash provided
by (used
in) operating activities
|
(31)
|
801
|
|
|
|
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
(123)
|
(540)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(123)
|
(540)
|
|
|
|
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
Payments
on debt
|
(250)
|
(240)
|
Net
activity on related-party debt
|
419
|
217
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
169
|
(23)
|
|
|
|
Net
change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted
cash
|
15
|
238
|
|
|
|
CASH,
CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH AT BEGINNING OF
PERIOD
|
1,665
|
2,146
|
CASH,
CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH AT END OF PERIOD
|
$1,680
|
$2,384
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Information:
|
|
|
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
Financing
of capital expenditures via accounts payable and capital
leases
|
$-
|
$82
|
Financing
of guaranty fees via long-term debt, related party
|
$158
|
$163
|
Interest
paid
|
$361
|
$558
|
Income
taxes paid
|
$-
|
$-
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
8
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
|
Nature of Operations. Blue Dolphin Energy Company is a
publicly-traded Delaware corporation primarily engaged in the
refining and marketing of petroleum products. We also provide
tolling and storage terminaling services. Our assets, which are in
Nixon, Texas, primarily include a 15,000-bpd crude distillation
tower and more than 1.0 million bbls of petroleum storage tanks
(collectively the “Nixon Facility”). Pipeline
transportation and oil and gas operations are no longer
active.
Structure and Management. Blue Dolphin is controlled by
Lazarus Energy Holdings, LLC (“LEH”). LEH operates and
manages all Blue Dolphin properties pursuant to an Amended and
Restated Operating Agreement (the “Amended and Restated
Operating Agreement”). Jonathan Carroll is Chairman of the
Board of Directors (the “Board”), Chief Executive
Officer, and President of Blue Dolphin, as well as a majority owner
of LEH. Together, LEH and Jonathan Carroll owned 79.8% of our
common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common
Stock”) at March 31, 2019. (See “Note (9) Related-Party
Transactions,” “Note (11) Long-Term Debt, Net”
and “Note (17) Commitments and Contingencies –
Financing Agreements” for additional disclosures related to
LEH, the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement, and Jonathan
Carroll.)
We have
the following active subsidiaries:
●
Blue Dolphin Pipe
Line Company, a Delaware corporation
(“BDPL”);
●
Blue Dolphin
Petroleum Company, a Delaware corporation;
●
Blue Dolphin
Services Co., a Texas corporation
(“BDSC”);
●
Lazarus Energy,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“LE”);
●
Lazarus Refining
& Marketing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“LRM”); and
●
Nixon Product
Storage, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“NPS”).
In June
2018, Blue Dolphin acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding
membership interests of NPS from Lazarus Midstream Partners, L.P.,
an affiliate of LEH, pursuant to an Assignment Agreement. The
assignment was accounted for as a combination of entities under
common control. See “Note (5) NPS Assignment” of this
Quarterly Report for further information related to the NPS
assignment.
See
“Part I, Item 1. Business” and “Part I, Item 2.
Properties” in our Annual Report for additional information
regarding our operating subsidiaries, principal facilities, and
assets.
Remainder
of Page Intentionally Left Blank
9
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Going Concern. Management has
determined that certain factors raise substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern. These factors include the
following:
●
Final Arbitration Award and
Settlement Agreement – As
previously disclosed, LE was
involved in arbitration proceedings (the “GEL
Arbitration”) with GEL Tex Marketing, LLC
(“GEL”), an affiliate of Genesis Energy, LP
(“Genesis”), related to a contractual dispute involving
a Crude Oil Supply and Throughput Services Agreement (the
“Crude Supply Agreement”) and a Joint Marketing
Agreement (the “Joint Marketing Agreement”), each
between LE and GEL and dated August 12, 2011. On August 11, 2017,
the arbitrator delivered the Final Arbitration Award. The Final
Arbitration Award denied all of LE’s claims against GEL and
granted substantially all the relief requested by GEL in its
counterclaims. Among other matters, the Final Arbitration Award awarded damages and
GEL’s attorneys’ fees and related expenses to GEL in
the aggregate amount of $31.3 million. After the initial $3.7 million payment to GEL in
September 2017, LE has made payments to GEL of $0.5 million per
month. As of the date of this Quarterly Report, LE has paid $11.7
million to GEL towards reducing the outstanding balance of the
Final Arbitration Award.
A hearing on confirmation of the Final Arbitration
Award was scheduled to occur on September 18, 2017 in state
district court in Harris County, Texas. Prior to the scheduled
hearing, LE and GEL jointly notified the court that the hearing
would be continued for a period of no more than 90 days after
September 18, 2017 (the “Continuance Period”), to
facilitate settlement discussions between the parties.
On September 26, 2017, LE and Blue
Dolphin, together with LEH and Jonathan Carroll, entered into a
Letter Agreement with GEL, effective September 18, 2017 (the
“GEL Letter Agreement”), confirming the parties’
agreement to the continuation of the confirmation hearing during
the Continuance Period, subject to the terms of the GEL Letter
Agreement. The GEL Letter Agreement was subsequently amended nine
times to extend the Continuance Period through July
2018.
LE,
NPS, and Blue Dolphin, together with LEH, Carroll & Company
Financial Holdings, L.P. (“C&C”), and Jonathan
Carroll (collectively referred to herein as the “Lazarus
Parties”), entered into that certain Settlement Agreement
with GEL, dated as of July 20, 2018 (as may be further amended,
restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the
“Settlement Agreement”), whereby GEL and the Lazarus
Parties agreed to mutually release all claims against each other
and to file a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice in connection
with the GEL Arbitration (the “Settlement”), subject to
the terms and conditions set forth in the Settlement Agreement. The
Settlement is conditioned upon payment by the Lazarus Parties to
GEL of $10.0 million in cash (the “Settlement
Payment”). Until either the Settlement Payment is made or the
Settlement Agreement is terminated, the Lazarus Parties must pay
GEL $0.5 million in cash at the end of each calendar month (the
“Interim Payments”). The Interim Payments will not be
applied to reduce the amount of the Settlement Payment, but such
payments will reduce the Final Arbitration Award. At the time of
the Settlement, the difference between the Settlement Payment and
the amount we have accrued on our consolidated balance sheet for
arbitration award payable will be recognized as a gain on our
consolidated statement of operations. At March 31, 2019 and
December 31, 2018, accrued arbitration award payable on our
consolidated balance sheet was $19.6 million and $21.1 million,
respectively.
The
Settlement Agreement restricts the Lazarus Parties from taking
certain actions without the prior written consent of GEL,
including: (i) the incurrence of any debt not specifically excepted
in the Settlement Agreement, (ii) the establishment of any liens
not specifically excepted in the Settlement Agreement, (iii) the
disposition of any assets other than certain ordinary course sales
to unaffiliated third parties, payments to unaffiliated third-party
trade creditors and scheduled debt payments, (iv) the entrance into
any transactions with affiliates not specifically excepted in the
Settlement Agreement, (v) the failure to pay debts generally as
they become due, and (vi) the entrance into a bankruptcy,
reorganization or similar proceeding. A violation of any of the
restrictions in the Settlement Agreement or failure of the Lazarus
Parties to make Interim Payments as they become due, will
constitute an event of default under the Settlement Agreement
which, subject to certain cure periods, would allow GEL to
terminate the Settlement Agreement and enforce its rights under the
Final Arbitration Award.
10
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
The Lazarus Parties are exploring the possibility
of obtaining a commercial loan or other financing
in an aggregate principal amount equal
to the Settlement Payment (the “Settlement Financing”),
subject to obtaining the consent of Veritex Community Bank
(“Veritex”), as lender under certain loan agreements
with the Lazarus Parties and their affiliates. Under the Settlement
Agreement, the Lazarus Parties are required to work in good faith
and take reasonable actions necessary to obtain the Settlement
Financing in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
Prior to the consummation of the Settlement Financing, the Lazarus
Parties are required to: (i) cause NPS to consummate the Settlement
Financing and restrict its ability to commence a bankruptcy case,
(ii) assign to NPS certain tank leases that will constitute
collateral for the Settlement Financing, and (iii) cause NPS to
assume joint and several liability for all or a portion of the
Final Arbitration Award. The failure to achieve certain milestones
in connection with obtaining the Settlement Financing will
constitute an event of default under the Settlement Agreement,
which would allow GEL to terminate the Settlement Agreement and
enforce its rights under the Final Arbitration
Award.
Simultaneously
with the execution of the Settlement Agreement, Jonathan Carroll
and C&C entered into a Security Agreement pursuant to which
Jonathan Carroll and C&C agreed to secure up to $10.0 million
of LE’s obligations under the Final Arbitration Award with a
security interest in their equity in LEH.
Unless extended in writing by GEL, the Settlement
Agreement will terminate on July 31, 2019 if the Settlement Payment
is not made on or before such date, and the Settlement Agreement
may be terminated by GEL following the occurrence of an event of
default under the Settlement Agreement, as described above.
Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the parties agreed to
terminate the GEL Letter Agreement, and GEL agreed not to take any
action to execute or collect on the Final Arbitration Award and to
take all action necessary to continue the District Court Action
until the earlier of: (i) the date on which the Settlement Payment
is paid or (ii) the termination of the Settlement Agreement.
On February 1, 2019, GEL filed a proposed order granting a joint
motion to continue the District Court Action. (See "Note (18)
Subsequent Events" for additional disclosures related to the
Settlement Agreement.)
Blue
Dolphin can provide no assurance that the conditions necessary to
consummation of the Settlement will be met. If certain conditions
are not met or the Settlement Agreement is terminated, GEL may seek
to enforce the Final Award against the Lazarus Parties, in which
case, Blue Dolphin and its affiliates would likely be required to
seek protection under bankruptcy laws.
●
Defaults Under Veritex Secured
Loan Agreements – LE and
LRM each have loans with a 100% USDA guarantee Veritex, as
successor in interest to Sovereign Bank by merger, in the original
aggregate amount of $35.0 million.
Events
of Default. Veritex delivered
to obligors notices of default under secured loan agreements with
Veritex, stating that the Final Arbitration Award constitutes an
event of default under the secured loan agreements. The occurrence
of an event of default permits Veritex to declare the amounts owed
under these loan agreements immediately due and payable, exercise
its rights with respect to collateral securing obligors’
obligations under these loan agreements, and/or exercise any other
rights and remedies available.
Veritex
has not accelerated or called due the secured loan agreements
considering the Settlement Agreement, which Veritex must ultimately
approve. Instead, Veritex has expressly reserved all of its rights,
privileges and remedies related to events of default under the
secured loan agreements and informed obligors that it would
consider a final confirmation of the Final Arbitration Award to be
a material event of default under the loan agreements. The debt
associated with these loans was classified within the current
portion of long-term debt on our consolidated balance sheets at
March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 due to existing events of
default related to the Final Arbitration Award as well as the
uncertainty of LE and LRM’s ability to meet financial
covenants in the secured loan agreements in the
future.
11
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Financial
Covenant Defaults. In addition
to existing events of default related to the Final Arbitration
Award, at March 31, 2019, LE and LRM were in violation of certain
financial covenants in secured loan agreements with Veritex.
Covenant defaults under the secured loan agreements would permit
Veritex to declare the amounts owed under these loan agreements
immediately due and payable, exercise its rights with respect to
collateral securing obligors’ obligations under these loan
agreements, and/or exercise any other rights and remedies
available. The debt associated with these loans was classified
within the current portion of long-term debt on our consolidated
balance sheets at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 due to
existing events of default related to the Final Arbitration Award
as well as the uncertainty of LE and LRM’s ability to meet
the financial covenants in the future.
Veritex has been working with LE and LRM and
continues to be aware and party to all discussions and arrangements
with GEL surrounding the executed settlement agreement and all
amendments and extensions with GEL. We can provide no
assurance that the conditions necessary for consummation of the
Settlement will be met. If certain conditions are not met or the
Settlement Agreement is terminated, GEL may seek to enforce the
Final Arbitration Award against the Lazarus Parties. Further, we
can provide no assurance as to whether
Veritex, as first lienholder, will approve the Settlement. If
Veritex does not approve the Settlement, Veritex may exercise its
rights and remedies under the secured loan agreements. In either
case: (i) our business operations, including crude oil and
condensate procurement and our customer relationships; financial
condition; and results of operations will be materially affected,
(ii) Blue Dolphin and its affiliates would likely be required to
seek protection under bankruptcy laws, and (iii) the trading prices
of our common stock and the value of an investment in our common
stock could significantly decrease, which could lead to holders of
our common stock losing their investment in our common stock in its
entirety. (See "Note (18) Subsequent Events" for additional
disclosures related to the Veritex secured loan
agreements.)
●
Consecutive Quarterly Net
Losses and Working Capital Deficits –
Despite consecutive quarterly net losses during 2018, we reported
net income of $0.7 million, or income of $0.07 per share, for the
three months ended March 31, 2019. Comparatively, we reported a net
loss of $0.2 million, or a loss of $0.01 per share, for the three
months ended March 31, 2018.
At
March 31, 2019, we had a working capital deficit of $70.7 million.
Excluding the current portion of long-term debt, we had a working
capital deficit of $28.6 million at March 31, 2019. At December 31,
2018, we had a working capital deficit of $71.9 million. Excluding
the current portion of long-term debt, we had a working capital
deficit of $30.0 million at December 31, 2018.
Operating Risks. Successful
execution of our business strategy depends on several key factors,
including the Settlement with GEL, having adequate working capital, obtaining credit
to meet operational needs and regulatory requirements, maintaining
safe and reliable operations at the Nixon Facility, meeting
contractual obligations, and having favorable margins on refined
petroleum products. Management believes that it is continuing to
take the appropriate steps to improve our operations and financial
stability. However, there can
be no assurance that our business strategy will be successful, that
LEH and its affiliates will continue to fund our working capital
needs, or that we will be able to obtain additional financing or
meet financial assurance (bonding) requirements on commercially
reasonable terms or at all. If Veritex does not approve the
Settlement or exercises its rights and remedies under the secured
loan agreements or if the Settlement Agreement with GEL is
terminated and GEL seeks to confirm and enforce the Final
Arbitration Award, our business, financial condition, and results
of operations will be materially adversely affected, and Blue
Dolphin and its affiliates would likely be required to seek
protection under bankruptcy laws. (See “Part I, Item 1.
Business – Business Strategy” in this Quarterly Report
for additional disclosures related to our business plan and
initiatives management has taken to date.)
For
additional disclosures related to the Final Arbitration Award, the
Settlement Agreement, defaults under secured loan agreements, our
business strategy, and risk factors that could materially affect
our future business, financial condition and results of operations,
refer to the following section in this Quarterly
Report:
●
Item 1. Financial
Statements:
–
Note (9)
Related-Party Transactions
–
Note (11) Long-Term
Debt, Net
–
Note (17)
Commitments and Contingencies – Legal Matters
–
Note (18)
Subsequent Events
12
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
●
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations:
–
Final Arbitration
Award and Settlement Agreement
–
Results of
Operations
–
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Refer
to the following sections in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2018 (the “Annual
Report”):
●
Part I, Item 1.
Business – Business Strategy
●
Part I, Item 1A.
Risk Factors
●
Part I, Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
(2)
|
Basis of Presentation
|
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements, which
include Blue Dolphin and its subsidiaries, have been prepared in
accordance with GAAP for interim consolidated financial information
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC under Article 10
of Regulation S-X and the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly,
certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in
our audited financial statements have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to the SEC’s rules and regulations. Significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated in the
consolidation. In management’s opinion, all adjustments
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included,
disclosures are adequate, and the presented information is not
misleading.
The
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 was derived from
the audited financial statements at that date. The accompanying
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included in our Annual Report. Operating results for the three
months ended March 31, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December
31, 2019, or for any other period.
(3)
|
Significant Accounting Policies
|
The
summary of significant accounting policies of Blue Dolphin is
presented to assist in understanding our consolidated financial
statements. Our consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes are representations of management, who is responsible for
their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform
to GAAP and have been consistently applied in the preparation of
our consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates. We have made several estimates and
assumptions related to the reporting of our consolidated assets and
liabilities and to the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in
conformity with GAAP. We believe our current estimates are
reasonable and appropriate; however, actual results could differ
from those estimated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents
represent liquid investments with an original maturity of three
months or less. Cash balances are maintained in depository and
overnight investment accounts with financial institutions that, at
times, may exceed insured deposit limits. We monitor the financial
condition of the financial institutions and have experienced no
losses associated with these accounts.
Restricted Cash. Restricted cash, current portion
primarily represents a payment reserve account held by Veritex as
security for payments under a loan agreement. Restricted cash,
noncurrent represents funds held in the Veritex disbursement
account for payment of construction related expenses to build new
petroleum storage tanks.
13
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.
Accounts receivable are presented net of any necessary allowance(s)
for doubtful accounts. Receivables are recorded at the invoiced
amount and generally do not bear interest. An allowance for
doubtful accounts is established, when necessary, based
on past experience and other factors which, in management's
judgment, deserve consideration in estimating bad debts.
Management assesses collectability primarily based on
the current aging status of the customer's account, our
historical collection experience with the customer, and the
customer's financial condition. Based on a review of
these factors, management establishes or adjusts the allowance for
specific customers and the accounts receivable portfolio as a
whole. We had an allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.1
million and $0.1 million at both March 31, 2019 and December 31,
2018.
Inventory. Our
inventory primarily consists of refined petroleum products, crude
oil and condensate, and chemicals. Inventory is valued at lower of
cost or net realizable value with cost being determined by the
average cost method, and net realizable value being determined
based on estimated selling prices less any associated delivery
costs. If the net realizable value of our refined petroleum
products inventory declines to an amount less than our average
cost, we record a write-down of inventory and an associated
adjustment to cost of goods sold. (See “Note (7)
Inventory” for additional disclosures related to our
inventory.)
Property and Equipment.
Refinery and Facilities. Management expects to continue
making improvements to the crude distillation tower based on
operational needs and technological advances. Additions to refinery
and facilities assets are capitalized. Expenditures for repairs and
maintenance are expensed as incurred.
We record refinery and facilities at cost less any adjustments for
depreciation or impairment. Adjustment of the asset and the
related accumulated depreciation accounts are made for the refinery
and facilities asset’s retirement and disposal, with the
resulting gain or loss included in the consolidated statements of
operations. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation of
refinery and facilities assets is computed using the straight-line
method using an estimated useful life of 25 years beginning when
the refinery and facilities assets are placed in service. We did
not record any impairment of our refinery and facilities assets for
the periods presented.
Pipelines and Facilities. Our pipelines and facilities are
recorded at cost less any adjustments for depreciation or
impairment. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method
over estimated useful lives ranging from 10 to 22 years. In
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) guidance on accounting for the impairment or
disposal of long-lived assets, management performed periodic
impairment testing of our pipeline and facilities assets in the
fourth quarter of 2016. Upon completion of that testing, our
pipeline assets were fully impaired. All pipeline transportation
services to third parties have ceased, existing third-party wells
along our pipeline corridor have been permanently abandoned, and no
new third-party wells are being drilled near our
pipelines.
Oil and Gas Properties. Our oil and gas properties are
accounted for using the full-cost method of accounting, whereby all
costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of
oil and gas properties, including directly related internal costs,
are capitalized on a cost center basis. Amortization of
such costs and estimated future development costs are determined
using the unit-of-production method. All leases associated with our
oil and gas properties have expired, and our oil and gas properties
were fully impaired in 2011.
Construction in Progress. Construction in progress
expenditures, including capitalized interest, relate to
construction and refurbishment activities at the Nixon Facility.
These expenditures are capitalized as incurred. Depreciation begins
once the asset is placed in service.
(See
“Note (8) Property, Plant and Equipment, Net” for
additional disclosures related to our refinery and facilities
assets, oil and gas properties, pipelines and facilities assets,
and construction in progress.)
14
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Revenue Recognition.
We
adopted the provisions of FASB ASU (defined below) 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (ASC 606), on January 1, 2018, as described
below in “New Pronouncements Adopted.” Accordingly, our
revenue recognition accounting policy has been revised to reflect
the adoption of this standard.
Refinery Operations Revenue. Revenue from the sale of
refined petroleum products is recognized when product is sold to
the customer in fulfillment of performance obligations. Each load
of refined petroleum product is separately identifiable and
represents a distinct performance obligation to which the
transaction price is allocated. Performance obligations are met
when control is transferred to the customer. Control is transferred
to the customer when the product has been lifted or, in cases where
the product is not lifted immediately (bill and hold arrangements),
when the product is added to the customer’s bulk inventory as
stored at the Nixon Facility.
We
consider a variety of facts and circumstances in assessing the
point of control transfer, including but not limited to: whether
the purchaser can direct the use of the refined petroleum product,
the transfer of significant risks and rewards, our rights to
payment, and transfer of legal title. In each case, the term
between sale and when payment is due is not significant.
Transportation, shipping, and handling costs incurred are included
in cost of goods sold. Excise and other taxes that are collected
from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are not
included in revenue.
Tolling and Terminaling Revenue. Tolling and terminaling
represents fees pursuant to: (i) tolling agreements, whereby a
customer agrees to pay a certain fee per gallon or barrel for
throughput volumes moving through the naphtha stabilizer unit and a
fixed monthly reservation fee for use of the naphtha stabilizer
unit and (ii) tank storage agreements, whereby a customer agrees to
pay a certain fee per tank based on tank size over a period of time
for the storage of products.
We
typically satisfy performance obligations for tolling and
terminaling operations with the passage of time. We determine the
transaction price at agreement inception based on the guaranteed
minimum amount of revenue over the term of the agreement. We
allocate the transaction price to the single performance obligation
that exists under the agreement, and we recognize revenue in the
amount for which we have a right to invoice. Generally,
payment terms do not exceed 30 days.
Revenue
from tank storage customers may, from time to time, include fees
for ancillary services, such as in-tank and tank-to-tank blending.
These services are considered optional to the customer, and the
price we charge for such services is not included in the fixed cost
under the customer’s tank storage agreement. Ancillary
services are considered a separate performance obligation by us
under the tank storage agreement. The performance obligation is
satisfied when the requested service has been performed in the
applicable period.
Income Taxes.
We
account for income taxes under FASB ASC guidance related to income
taxes, which requires recognition of income taxes based on amounts
payable with respect to the current reporting period and the
effects of deferred taxes for the expected future tax consequences
of events that have been included in our financial statements or
tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on the differences between the
financial accounting and tax basis of assets and liabilities, as
well as for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards using
enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences
are expected to reverse.
As of
each reporting date, management considers new evidence, both
positive and negative, to determine the realizability of deferred
tax assets. Management considers whether it is more likely than not
that a portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized,
which is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income
prior to the expiration of any net operating loss
(“NOL”) carryforwards. When management determines that
it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized,
a valuation allowance is recorded to reduce deferred tax assets. A
significant piece of objective negative evidence evaluated was
cumulative losses incurred over the three-year period ended
December 31, 2018. Such objective evidence limits the ability to
consider other subjective evidence, such as projections for future
growth. Based on this evaluation, we recorded a valuation allowance
against the deferred tax assets for which realization was not
deemed more likely than not as of March 31, 2019 and December 31,
2018. We expect to recover deferred tax assets related to the
Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) credit carryforwards.
In addition, we have NOL carryforwards that remain available for
future use.
15
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
The
benefit of an uncertain tax position is recognized in the financial
statements if it meets a minimum recognition threshold. A
determination is first made as to whether it is more likely than
not that the income tax position will be sustained, based upon
technical merits, upon examination by the taxing authorities. If
the income tax position is expected to meet the
more-likely-than-not criteria, the benefit recorded in the
financial statements equals the largest amount that is greater than
50% likely to be realized upon its ultimate settlement. At March
31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there were no uncertain tax
positions for which a reserve or liability was necessary. (See
“Note (15) Income Taxes” for further information
related to income taxes.)
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. In accordance
with FASB ASC guidance on accounting for the impairment or disposal
of long-lived assets, we periodically evaluate our long-lived
assets for impairment. Additionally, we evaluate our long-lived
assets when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying
value of these assets may not be recoverable. The carrying value is
not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash
flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of
the asset or group of assets. If the carrying value exceeds the sum
of the undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss equal to the
amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the
asset or group of assets is recognized. Significant management
judgment is required in the forecasting of future operating results
that are used in the preparation of projected cash flows and,
should different conditions prevail or judgments be made, material
impairment charges could be necessary. As a result of the Final
Arbitration Award, which represents a significant adverse change
that could affect the value of a long-lived asset, management
performed potential impairment testing of our refinery and
facilities assets in the fourth quarter of 2018. Upon completion of
that testing, we determined that no impairment was necessary at
December 31, 2018. We did not record any impairment of our refinery
and facilities assets for the periods presented.
Asset Retirement Obligations. FASB ASC guidance related to
asset retirement obligations (“AROs”) requires that a
liability for the discounted fair value of an ARO be recorded in
the period in which incurred, and the corresponding cost
capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the related
long-lived asset. The liability is accreted towards its future
value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the
useful life of the related asset. If the liability is settled for
an amount other than the recorded amount, a gain or loss is
recognized.
Management
has concluded that there is no legal or contractual obligation to
dismantle or remove the refinery and facilities assets. Further,
management believes that these assets have indeterminate lives
under FASB ASC guidance for estimating AROs because dates or ranges
of dates upon which we would retire these assets cannot reasonably
be estimated at this time. When a legal or contractual obligation
to dismantle or remove the refinery and facilities assets arises
and a date or range of dates can reasonably be estimated for the
retirement of these assets, we will estimate the cost of performing
the retirement activities and record a liability for the fair value
of that cost using present value techniques.
We
recorded an ARO liability related to future asset retirement costs
associated with dismantling, relocating, or disposing of our
offshore platform, pipeline systems, and related onshore
facilities, as well as for plugging and abandoning wells and
restoring land and sea beds. We developed these cost estimates for
each of our assets based upon regulatory requirements, structural
makeup, water depth, reservoir characteristics, reservoir depth,
equipment demand, current retirement procedures, and construction
and engineering consultations. Because these costs typically extend
many years into the future, estimating future costs are difficult
and require management to make judgments that are subject to future
revisions based upon numerous factors, including changing
technology, political, and regulatory environments. We review our
assumptions and estimates of future abandonment costs on an annual
basis. (See “Note (12) Asset Retirement Obligations”
for additional information related to our AROs.)
Computation of Earnings Per Share. We apply the provisions
of FASB ASC guidance for computing earnings per share
(“EPS”). The guidance requires the presentation of
basic EPS, which excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net
income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average
number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. The
guidance requires dual presentation of basic EPS and diluted EPS on
the face of our consolidated statements of operations and requires
a reconciliation of the denominator of basic EPS and diluted EPS.
Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income available to common
stockholders by the diluted weighted average number of common
shares outstanding, which includes the potential dilution that
could occur if securities or other contracts to issue shares of
common stock were converted to common stock that then shared in the
earnings of the entity.
16
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
The
number of shares related to options, warrants, restricted stock,
and similar instruments included in diluted EPS is based on the
“Treasury Stock Method” prescribed in FASB ASC guidance
for computation of EPS. This method assumes theoretical repurchase
of shares using proceeds of the respective stock option or warrant
exercised, and, for restricted stock, the amount of compensation
cost attributed to future services that has not yet been recognized
and the amount of any current and deferred tax benefit that would
be credited to additional paid-in-capital upon the vesting of the
restricted stock, at a price equal to the issuer’s average
stock price during the related earnings period. Accordingly, the
number of shares includable in the calculation of EPS in respect of
the stock options, warrants, restricted stock, and similar
instruments is dependent on this average stock price and will
increase as the average stock price increases. (See “Note
(16) Earnings Per Share” for additional information related
to EPS.)
New Pronouncements Adopted. The FASB issues an Accounting
Standards Update (“ASU”) to communicate changes to the
FASB ASC, including changes to non-authoritative SEC content.
Recently adopted ASUs include:
ASUs 2019-01, 2018-20, 2018-11, 2018-10, and 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842). In
February 2016, FASB amended its accounting guidance for leases.
Subsequently, FASB issued several clarifications and updates. The
guidance requires a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities on
the balance sheet arising from leases with terms greater than 12
months. While lessor guidance is relatively unchanged, certain
amendments were made to confirm with changes made to lessee
accounting and the amended revenue recognition guidance. The new
guidance continues to classify leases as either finance or
operating, with classification affecting the presentation and
pattern of expense and income recognition, in the statement of
operations. It also requires additional quantitative and
qualitative disclosures about leasing arrangements. We adopted the
new guidance on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective
approach, which was applied beginning on the adoption date.
Comparative information has not been restated and continues to be
reported under the accounting guidance in effect for those periods.
The adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated
statements of operations or cash flows. On the adoption date we
recognized operating lease right-of-use assets, net of pre-existing
deferred rent, and operating lease liabilities on our consolidated
balance sheet of approximately $0.8 million and $0.9 million,
respectively.
ASU 2018-09, Codification Improvements. In July 2018, FASB
issued ASU 2018-09. This guidance affects a wide variety of topics
in the codification and represents changes to clarify, correct
errors in, or make minor improvements to the codification. The
amendments make the codification easier to understand and easier to
apply by eliminating inconsistencies and providing clarifications.
The amendments apply to all reporting entities within the scope of
the affected accounting guidance. Some of the amendments in ASU
2018-09 do not require transition guidance and will be effective
upon issuance. However, many of the amendments do have transition
guidance with effective dates for annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2018, for public business entities. Adoption of this
guidance did not have a significant impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC
606). We adopted this accounting pronouncement effective
January 1, 2018, using a modified retrospective approach, which
required us to apply the new revenue standard to: (i) all new
revenue contracts entered into after January 1, 2018 and (ii) all
existing revenue contracts as of January 1, 2018. In accordance
with this approach, our consolidated revenues for the periods prior
to January 1, 2018 will not be revised. In November 2018, FASB
issued ASU 2018-18, Collaborative
Arrangements (Topic 808). ASU 2018-18 clarifies the
interaction between ASC 808 and ASC 606. Our implementation
activities related to ASC 606 are complete, and we did not have any
material differences in the amount or timing of revenues as a
result of the adoption of ASC 606. Our largest revenue streams
consist of orders received from our customers for crude-oil derived
specialty products based on market prices. These revenues are
recognized at a point in time upon transfer of control of the
product in accordance with contractual terms. With respect to ASC
808, we are not party to a collaborative agreement with a third
party.
17
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
New Pronouncements Issued, Not Yet Effective. The following
are recently issued, but not yet effective, ASU’s that may
influence our consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows:
ASU 2018-17, Consolidation (Topic 810). In October 2018,
FASB issued ASU 2018-17. This ASU provides targeted improvements to
related-party guidance for variable interest entities. In
particular, indirect interests held through related parties in
common control arrangements should be considered on a proportional
basis for determining whether fees paid to decision makers and
service providers are variable interests. For entities other than
private companies, the amendments in ASU 2018-17 are effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. We do not expect adoption of this
guidance to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
ASU 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740). In March
2018, FASB issued ASU 2018-05. This guidance amends SEC paragraphs
in ASC 740, Income Taxes, to reflect SAB 118, which provides
guidance for companies that are not able to complete their
accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
in the period of enactment. This guidance also includes
amendments to the XBRL Taxonomy. For public business
entities, the amendments in ASU 2018-05 are effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is
permitted. We do not expect adoption of this guidance to
have a significant impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Other new pronouncements issued but not yet effective are not
expected to have a material impact on our financial position,
results of operations, or liquidity.
Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank
18
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
(4)
|
Revenue
and Segment Information
|
We have
two reportable business segments: (i) Refinery Operations and (ii)
Tolling and Terminaling. Refinery operations relate to the refining
and marketing of petroleum products at our 15,000-bpd crude
distillation tower. Tolling and terminaling operations relate to
tolling and storage terminaling services under related-party and
third-party lease agreements. Both operations are conducted at the
Nixon Facility.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
●
Disaggregation of Revenue - Revenue is
presented in the table below under “Segment
Information” disaggregated by business segment because this
is the level of disaggregation that management has determined to be
beneficial to users of our financial statements.
●
Receivables from Contracts with
Customers - Our receivables from contracts with customers
are reflected as receivables, net as presented on our consolidated
balance sheets.
●
Remaining Performance Obligations - The
majority of our contracts with customers are spot contracts and
therefore have no remaining performance obligations.
Segment Information.
Business
segment information for the periods indicated (and as of the dates
indicated) was as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|||||||
|
2019
|
2018
|
||||||
|
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
|
Segments
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
||
|
Refinery
|
Tolling
and
|
Corporate
|
|
Refinery
|
Tolling
and
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Operations
|
Terminaling
|
&
Other
|
Total
|
Operations
|
Terminaling
|
&
Other
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (excluding
intercompany fees and sales)
|
$67,858
|
$1,069
|
$-
|
$68,927
|
$71,512
|
$734
|
$-
|
$72,246
|
Intercompany fees and
sales
|
(606)
|
606
|
-
|
-
|
(671)
|
671
|
-
|
-
|
Operation costs and expenses(1)
|
(65,152)
|
(364)
|
(57)
|
(65,573)
|
(70,151)
|
(341)
|
(110)
|
(70,602)
|
Segment contribution
margin
|
$2,100
|
$1,311
|
$(57)
|
$3,354
|
$690
|
$1,064
|
$(110)
|
$1,644
|
General and
administrative expenses
|
(332)
|
(43)
|
(445)
|
(820)
|
(394)
|
(42)
|
(378)
|
(814)
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
(465)
|
(99)
|
(26)
|
(590)
|
(409)
|
(46)
|
-
|
(455)
|
Interest and other
non-operating expenses, net
|
|
|
|
(1,197)
|
|
|
|
(743)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before
income taxes
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
(368)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
benefit
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss)
|
|
|
|
$747
|
|
|
|
$(151)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
$40
|
$83
|
$-
|
$123
|
$336
|
$204
|
$-
|
$540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable
assets
|
$50,340
|
$18,880
|
$2,429
|
$71,649
|
$52,460
|
$18,912
|
$1,006
|
$72,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Operation
costs within Refinery Operations includes the arbitration award and
associated fees. Operation cost within Tolling and Terminaling
includes terminal operating expenses, an allocation of other costs
(e.g. insurance and maintenance), and associated refinery fuel use
costs. Operation cost within Corporate and Other includes expenses
associated with our pipeline assets and oil and gas leasehold
interests (such as accretion).
|
|
|
19
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
(5)
|
NPS Assignment
|
In June
2018, Blue Dolphin obtained 100% of the issued and outstanding
membership interest of NPS, a Delaware limited liability company,
from Lazarus Midstream Partners, L.P. (“Lazarus
Midstream”), an affiliate of LEH, pursuant to an Assignment
Agreement. The transaction represents transfer of a vacant shell
entity owned by Lazarus Midstream to Blue Dolphin for the nominal
fee of $10.00. The assignment of interest facilitates the Lazarus
Parties exploring the possibility of
obtaining the Settlement Financing under the Settlement
Agreement.
The
assignment was accounted for as a combination of entities under
common control. Accordingly, the recognized assets and liabilities
of NPS were transferred at their carrying amounts at the date of
transfer and the results of operations are included for the three
months ended March 31, 2019. NPS did not have significant assets,
liabilities or results of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2018. NPS holds a leasehold interest in petroleum storage
tanks at the Nixon Facility. NPS’ revenues and expenses are
included in our Tolling and Terminaling business
segment.
(6)
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets as of the dates indicated
consisted of the following:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
insurance
|
$791
|
$437
|
Other
prepaids
|
85
|
183
|
Prepaid
crude oil and condensate
|
-
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
|
$876
|
$1,786
|
(7)
|
Inventory
|
Inventory
as of the dates indicated consisted of the following:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Crude
oil and condensate
|
$1,365
|
$861
|
AGO
|
206
|
276
|
Chemicals
|
107
|
106
|
Naphtha
|
138
|
143
|
Propane
|
20
|
17
|
LPG
mix
|
7
|
5
|
HOBM
|
-
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
$1,843
|
$1,510
|
20
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
(8)
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net, as of the dates indicated consisted of
the following:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Refinery
and facilities
|
$66,308
|
$63,058
|
Land
|
566
|
566
|
Other
property and equipment
|
747
|
747
|
|
67,621
|
64,371
|
|
|
|
Less:
Accumulated depletion, depreciation, and amortization
|
(10,993)
|
(10,429)
|
|
56,628
|
53,942
|
|
|
|
Construction
in progress
|
7,628
|
10,755
|
|
|
|
|
$64,256
|
$64,697
|
We
capitalize interest cost incurred on funds used to construct
property, plant, and equipment. Capitalized interest, which is
recorded as part of the asset to which it relates, is depreciated
over the asset’s useful life. Interest cost capitalized,
which is currently included in construction in progress, was $0.7
million and $1.3 million at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018,
respectively. Capital expenditures at the Nixon Facility are being
funded by working capital derived from revenue from operations and
LEH and its affiliates (including Jonathan Carroll), as well as
from long-term debt from Veritex that was secured in 2015 for
expansion of the Nixon Facility. Unused amounts under the Veritex
loans are reflected in restricted cash (current and non-current
portions) on our consolidated balance sheets and will be available
for use once events of default associated with the Final
Arbitration Award are remedied. See
“Note (11) Long-Term Debt, Net” for additional
disclosures related to borrowings for capital
spending.
(9)
|
Related-Party Transactions
|
Blue
Dolphin and certain of its subsidiaries are party to several
agreements with LEH and its affiliates. Management believes that
these related-party transactions were consummated on terms
equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length
transactions.
Related Parties.
LEH. LEH is our controlling shareholder. Jonathan Carroll,
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President of
Blue Dolphin, is the majority owner of LEH. Together, LEH and
Jonathan Carroll owned 79.8% of our Common Stock at March 31, 2019.
Related-party agreements with LEH include: (i) an Amended and
Restated Operating Agreement with Blue Dolphin and LE, (ii) a Jet
Fuel Sales Agreement with LE, (iii) a Loan Agreement with BDPL,
(iv) an Amended and Restated Promissory Note with Blue Dolphin, and
(v) an office sublease-agreement with BDSC. Additionally, in June
2018, Blue Dolphin obtained 100% of the issued and outstanding
membership interest of NPS from Lazarus Midstream for the nominal
fee of $10.00 pursuant to an Assignment Agreement. (See “Note
(5) NPS Assignment” for further discussion related to the NPS
transaction.)
Ingleside Crude, LLC (“Ingleside”). Ingleside is
a related party of LEH and Jonathan Carroll. Blue Dolphin is party
to an Amended and Restated Promissory Note with
Ingleside.
Lazarus Marine Terminal I, LLC (“LMT”). LMT is a
related party of LEH and Jonathan Carroll. LE is party to a Dock
Tolling Agreement with LMT.
21
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Jonathan Carroll. Jonathan Carroll is Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer, and President of Blue Dolphin.
Related-party agreements with Jonathan Carroll include: (i) Amended
and Restated Guaranty Fee Agreements with LE and LRM and (ii) an
Amended and Restated Promissory Note with Blue Dolphin. The
guaranty fee agreements and the promissory note relate to LE and
LRM USDA-guaranteed loans.
Currently,
we depend on LEH and its affiliates (including Jonathan Carroll and
Ingleside) for financing when revenue from operations and
borrowings under bank facilities are insufficient to meet our
liquidity needs. Such borrowings are reflected in our consolidated
balance sheets in accounts payable, related party, and/or long-term
debt, related party.
Operations Related Agreements.
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement. LEH operates and
manages all Blue Dolphin properties pursuant to the Amended and
Restated Operating Agreement. The Amended and Restated Operating
Agreement, which was restructured in 2017 following cessation of
crude supply and marketing activities under the Crude Supply
Agreement and Joint Marketing Agreement with GEL, expires: (i)
April 1, 2020, (ii) upon written notice by either party to the
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of a material breach by
the other party, or (iii) upon 90 days’ notice by the Board
if the Board determines that the Amended and Restated Operating
Agreement is not in our best interest. LEH receives a management
fee calculated as 5% of certain of our direct operating expenses.
During the fourth quarter of 2018, the management fee was changed
to be calculated based on year to date operating expenses incurred,
regardless of whether they were paid for by LEH or LE. The
management fee was previously reflected within refinery operating
expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
Jet Fuel Sales Agreement. LE sells jet fuel to LEH pursuant
to a Jet Fuel Sales Agreement. LEH resells the jet fuel purchased
from LE to a government agency. LEH bids for jet fuel contracts are
evaluated under preferential pricing terms due to its HUBZone
certification. The Jet Fuel Sales Agreement terminates on the
earliest to occur of: (a) a one-year term expiring March 31, 2020
plus a 30-day carryover or (b) delivery of a maximum quantity of
jet fuel as defined therein. Sales to LEH under the Jet Fuel Sales
Agreement are reflected within refinery operations revenue in our
consolidated statements of operations.
Dock Tolling Agreement. In May 2016, LE entered a Dock
Tolling Agreement with LMT to facilitate loading and unloading of
petroleum products by barge at LMT’s dock facility in
Ingleside, Texas. The Dock Tolling Agreement has a five-year term
and may be terminated at any time by the agreement of both parties.
LE pays LMT a flat reservation fee monthly. The reservation fee
includes tolling volumes up to 84,000 gallons per day. Excess
tolling volumes are subject to an increased per gallon rate.
Amounts expensed as tolling fees under the Dock Tolling Agreement
are reflected in cost of goods sold in our consolidated statements
of operations.
Office Sub-Lease Agreement. In January 2018, BDSC entered
into an Office Space Agreement with LEH to lease office space at
our headquarters building in Houston, Texas. The Office Space
Agreement has a term of sixty-eight (68) months expiring on August
31, 2023. Under the Office Space Agreement, LEH’s base rent
is approximately $0.02 million per month. The Office Space
Agreement includes rent abatement periods.
Financial Agreements.
We
currently rely on LEH and its affiliates (including Jonathan
Carroll) to fund our working capital requirements. LEH and its
affiliates (Ingleside and Jonathan Carroll) have provided working
capital to Blue Dolphin in the form of a term loan and non-cash
advances (such as conversion of accounts payable to debt under
promissory notes). Our long-term debt, related party is currently
in default.
There
can be no assurance that LEH and its affiliates will continue to
fund our working capital requirements. Outstanding principal and
accrued interest owed under these financial agreements are
reflected in long-term debt, related party, current portion in our
consolidated balance sheets.
22
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
BDPL Loan Agreement (In Default). BDPL has a 2016 loan agreement and
related security agreement with LEH as lender (the “BDPL Loan
Agreement”). The BDPL Loan Agreement is currently in default
due to non-payment. Key terms of the BDPL Loan Agreement are as
follow:
Principal
Amount:
|
$4.0
million
|
Maturity
Date:
|
August
2018
|
Principal
and Interest Payment:
|
$500,000
annually
|
Interest
Rate:
|
16.00%
|
The
proceeds of the BDPL Loan Agreement were used for working capital.
There are no financial maintenance covenants associated with the
BDPL Loan Agreement. The BDPL Loan Agreement is secured by certain
property owned by BDPL. Outstanding principal owed to LEH under the
BDPL Loan Agreement is reflected in long-term debt, related party,
current portion in our consolidated balance sheets. Accrued
interest under the BDPL Loan Agreement is reflected in interest
payable, related party, current portion in our consolidated balance
sheets.
Promissory Notes (In Default). Working capital provided to Blue
Dolphin in the form of non-cash advances whereby accounts payable,
related party was converted to debt under promissory notes are
reflected below. The promissory notes matured in January 2019.
Interest, which is compounded annually, is still accruing at a rate
of 8.00% and is reported as part of the outstanding balance. The
promissory notes are currently in default due to
non-payment.
●
June LEH Note – The June LEH Note
reflects amounts owed to LEH at March 31, 2019 under the Amended
and Restated Operating Agreement.
●
March Ingleside Note – The March
Ingleside Note reflects amounts owed to Ingleside at March 31, 2019
under the Amended and Restated Tank Lease Agreement.
●
March Carroll Note –The March
Carroll Note reflects amounts owed to Jonathan Carroll at March 31,
2019 under the guaranty fee agreements. Jonathan Carroll has
received no payments under the promissory note, either in cash or
common stock, since May 2017.
Amended and Restated Guaranty Fee Agreements. Jonathan
Carroll was required to provide a guarantee for repayment of funds
borrowed and interest accrued under certain LE and LRM
USDA-guaranteed loans. For his personal guarantee, LE and LRM each
entered a Guaranty Fee Agreement with Jonathan Carroll whereby he
earns a fee equal to 2.00% per annum of the outstanding principal
balance owed under the loan agreements. Effective in April 2017,
the Guaranty Fee Agreements were amended and restated (the
“Amended and Restated Guaranty Fee Agreements”) to
reflect payment in cash and shares of Blue Dolphin Common Stock.
Amounts owed to Jonathan Carroll under Amended and Restated
Guaranty Fee Agreements are reflected within long-term debt,
related party, net of current portion in our consolidated balance
sheets. Guaranty fees are recognized
monthly as incurred and are included in interest and other expense
in our consolidated statements of operations. (See
“Note (11) Long-Term Debt, Net – Amended and Restated
Guaranty Fee Agreements” for a breakdown of guaranty fee
expenses for each secured loan agreement.) Jonathan Carroll has
received no payments under guaranty fee agreements, either in cash
or common stock, since May 2017.
Remainder
of Page Intentionally Left Blank
23
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Financial Statements Impact.
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Accounts payable, related party
to LMT associated with the Dock Tolling Agreement were $1.7 million
and $1.5 million at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018,
respectively.
Long-term
debt, related party, current portion, in default and interest
payable, related party, in default as of the dates indicated was as
follows:
|
March
31,
2019
|
December
31,
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
LEH:
|
|
|
June LEH
Note
|
$821
|
$611
|
BDPL Loan
Agreement
|
5,694
|
5,534
|
LEH total
|
6,515
|
6,145
|
|
|
|
Ingleside
|
|
|
March
Ingleside Note
|
1,308
|
1,283
|
Jonathan
Carroll
|
|
|
March
Carroll Note
|
1,330
|
1,147
|
|
9,153
|
8,575
|
|
|
|
Less:
Long-term debt, related party, current portion, in
default
|
(7,459)
|
(7,041)
|
Less: Interest payable,
related party, in default
|
(1,694)
|
(1,534)
|
|
$-
|
$-
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Revenue from related
parties was as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|||
|
2019
|
2018
|
||
|
(in
thousands, except percent
amounts)
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Refinery
operations
|
|
|
|
|
LEH
|
$20,809
|
30.2%
|
$20,567
|
28.5%
|
Other
customers
|
47,049
|
68.3%
|
50,945
|
70.5%
|
Tolling
and terminaling
|
|
|
|
|
Other
customers
|
1,069
|
1.5%
|
734
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$68,927
|
100.0%
|
$72,246
|
100.0%
|
Fees
associated with the Dock Tolling Agreement with LMT totaled $0.2
million for both three-month periods ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.
Lease payments received under the office sub-lease agreement with
LEH totaled $0.01 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019
and 2018.
The
management fee was flat, totaling approximately $0.2 million in
both three-month periods ended March 31, 2019 and
2018.
24
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Interest
expense associated with the BDPL Loan Agreement, the Amended and
Restated Guaranty Fee Agreements, and the related-party promissory
notes (the June LEH Note, the March Ingleside Note, and the March
Carroll Note) for the periods indicated was as
follows:
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan
Carroll
|
|
|
Guaranty
Fee Arrangements
|
$158
|
$163
|
March
Carroll Note
|
25
|
-
|
LEH
|
|
|
BDPL
Loan Agreement
|
160
|
160
|
June LEH
Note
|
6
|
-
|
Ingleside
|
|
|
March
Ingleside Note
|
26
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
$375
|
$370
|
(10)
|
Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities as of the dates indicated
consisted of the following:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
$539
|
$61
|
Board
of director fees payable
|
435
|
273
|
Unearned
revenue
|
343
|
434
|
Easement
payable
|
205
|
223
|
Excise
and income taxes payable
|
185
|
47
|
Customer
deposits
|
109
|
109
|
Property
taxes
|
82
|
48
|
Other
payable
|
50
|
265
|
Accrued
rent
|
-
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
$1,948
|
$1,571
|
(11)
|
Long-Term Debt, Net
|
USDA Guaranteed Loans. Certain of our long-term debt is
guaranteed by the United States Department of Agriculture (the
“USDA”). The USDA, acting through its agencies,
administers a federal rural credit program that makes direct loans
and guarantees portions of loans made and serviced by
USDA-qualified lenders for various purposes. Each USDA guarantee is
a full faith and credit obligation of the United States with the
USDA guaranteeing up to 100% of the principal amount of guaranteed
loans. The lender on each USDA guaranteed loan is required by
regulation to retain the unguaranteed portion of the guaranteed
loan, to service the entire underlying guaranteed loan, including
the USDA-guaranteed portion and the unguaranteed portion, and to
remain mortgage and/or secured party of record. The USDA-guaranteed
portion and the unguaranteed portion of the loan are to be secured
by the same collateral with equal lien priority. The
USDA-guaranteed portion of a loan cannot be paid later than, or in
any way be subordinated to, the related unguaranteed portion.
During 2015, LE and LRM obtained loans each with a USDA guarantee
of 100% through Sovereign as lender (now Veritex, as successor in interest to Sovereign by
merger) in the aggregate amount of $35.0 million. The LE
$25.0 million USDA-guaranteed loan is referenced herein as the
“First Term Loan Due 2034”. The LRM $10.0 million
USDA-guaranteed loan is referenced herein as the “Second Term
Loan Due 2034”.
25
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Amended and Restated Guaranty Fee Agreements. As a condition
of the First Term Loan Due 2034 and Second Term Loan Due 2034,
Jonathan Carroll was required to provide a guarantee for
repayment of funds
borrowed and interest accrued under the USDA-guaranteed loans. LEH,
LRM and Blue Dolphin also cross-guaranteed the First Term Loan Due
2034 and Second Term Loan Due 2034. (See “Note (9)
Related-Party Transactions” for additional disclosures
related to LEH, Jonathan Carroll, and the Amended and Restated
Guaranty Fee Agreements.) Guaranty
fees earned by Jonathan Carroll for the periods indicated, which
were included in interest expense, were as
follows:
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
First
Term Loan Due 2034
|
$112
|
$116
|
Second
Term Loan Due 2034
|
46
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
$158
|
$163
|
Defaults in USDA-Guaranteed Loan Agreements. As described
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, Veritex notified LE and LRM
that the Final Arbitration Award constitutes an event of default
under the First Term Loan Due 2034 and the Second Term Loan Due
2034. In addition to existing events of default related to the
Final Arbitration Award, at March 31, 2019, LE and LRM were in
violation of the debt service coverage ratio, the current ratio,
and debt-to-net worth ratio financial covenants related to the
First Term Loan Due 2034 and Second Term Loan 2034. LE also failed
to replenish a payment reserve account as required under the First
Term Loan Due 2034. The occurrence of events of default under the
First Term Loan Due 2034 and Second Term Loan Due 2034 permits
Veritex to declare the amounts owed under the First Term Loan Due
2034 and Second Term Loan Due 2034 immediately due and payable,
exercise its rights with respect to collateral securing LE and
LRM’s obligations under the loan agreements, and/or exercise
any other rights and remedies available. Veritex has not accelerated or called due the
First Term Loan Due 2034 and Second Term Loan Due 2034 considering
the Settlement Agreement, which Veritex must ultimately approve.
Instead, Veritex has expressly reserved all its rights,
privileges and remedies related to events of default under the
First Term Loan Due 2034 and Second Term Loan Due 2034 and informed
LE and LRM that it would consider a final confirmation of the Final
Arbitration Award to be a material event of default under the loan
agreements. Additionally, Veritex must ultimately approve the
Settlement. Any exercise by Veritex of its rights and remedies
under the First Term Loan Due 2034 and Second Term Loan Due 2034
would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations and would likely require Blue
Dolphin to seek protection under bankruptcy laws. (See “Note
(1) Organization – Going Concern” and “–
Operating Risks” and "Note (18) Subsequent Events" for
additional disclosures related to the First Term Loan Due 2034 and
Second Term Loan Due 2034, the Final Arbitration Award and
financial covenant violations.)
Remainder
of Page Intentionally Left Blank
26
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Long-Term Debt, Net Outstanding Balances. Long-term debt,
net represents the outstanding principal of long-term debt less
associated debt issue costs. [See “Note (9) Related-Party
Transactions” for additional disclosures with respect to
related-party long-term debt.] As described within this “Note
(11”) Long-Term Debt, Net,” certain of our long-term
debt is currently in default. Long-term debt, net as of the dates
indicated consisted of the following:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
First
Term Loan Due 2034 (in default)
|
$22,376
|
$22,550
|
Second
Term Loan Due 2034 (in default)
|
9,234
|
9,300
|
Notre
Dame Debt (in default)
|
4,978
|
4,978
|
Capital
leases
|
31
|
41
|
|
$36,619
|
$36,869
|
|
|
|
Less:
Current portion of long-term debt, net
|
(34,645)
|
(34,863)
|
|
|
|
Less:
Unamortized debt issue costs
|
(1,974)
|
(2,006)
|
|
|
|
|
$-
|
$-
|
Unamortized
debt issue costs, which relate to secured loan agreements with
Veritex, as of the dates indicated consisted of the
following:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
First
Term Loan Due 2034 (in default)
|
$1,674
|
$1,674
|
Second
Term Loan Due 2034 (in default)
|
768
|
768
|
|
|
|
Less:
Accumulated amortization
|
(468)
|
(436)
|
|
|
|
|
$1,974
|
$2,006
|
Amortization
expense was $0.03 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019
and 2018.
Accrued
interest associated with long-term debt, net is reflected as
interest payable, in default in our consolidated balance sheets.
Accrued interest as of the dates indicated consisted of the
following:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Notre
Dame Debt (in default)
|
$3,041
|
$2,843
|
Second
Term Loan Due 2034 (in default)
|
108
|
53
|
First
Term Loan Due 2034 (in default)
|
175
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
3,324
|
2,939
|
|
|
|
Less:
Interest payable, in default
|
(3,324)
|
(2,939)
|
|
|
|
Long-term
interest payable, net of current portion
|
$-
|
$-
|
27
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Principal
Amount:
|
$25.0
million
|
Maturity
Date:
|
June
2034
|
Principal
and Interest Payment:
|
$0.2
million monthly
|
Interest
Rate:
|
Wall
Street Journal Prime Rate plus 2.75%
|
A
portion of the proceeds of the First Term Loan Due 2034 were used
to refinance approximately $8.5 million of debt owed under a
previous debt facility with American First National Bank. Remaining
proceeds are being used primarily to construct new petroleum
storage tanks at the Nixon Facility. The First Term Loan Due 2034,
which is 100% USDA-guaranteed, is secured by: (i) a first lien on
the Nixon Facility’s business assets (excluding accounts
receivable and inventory), (ii) assignment of all Nixon Facility
contracts, permits, and licenses, (iii) absolute assignment of
Nixon Facility rents and leases, including tank rental income, (iv)
a payment reserve account held by Veritex, and (v) a pledge of $5.0
million of a life insurance policy on Jonathan Carroll. The First
Term Loan Due 2034 contains representations and warranties,
affirmative, restrictive, and financial covenants, as well as
events of default which are customary for bank facilities of this
type.
Pursuant
to a construction rider in the First Term Loan Due 2034, proceeds
available for use were placed in a disbursement account whereby
Veritex makes payments for construction related expenses. Amounts
held in the disbursement account are reflected as restricted cash
(current portion) and restricted cash, noncurrent in our
consolidated balance sheets. (See "Note (18) Subsequent Events" for
additional disclosures related to the Veritex secured loan
agreements.)
Second Term Loan Due 2034 (In Default). Key terms of the
Second Term Loan Due 2034 are as follow:
Principal
Amount:
|
$10.0
million
|
Maturity
Date:
|
December
2034
|
Principal
and Interest Payment:
|
$0.1
million monthly
|
Interest
Rate:
|
Wall
Street Journal Prime Rate plus 2.75%
|
A
portion of the proceeds of the Second Term Loan Due 2034 were used
to refinance a previous bridge loan from Veritex in the amount of
$3.0 million, the funds of which were used to purchase idle
refinery equipment for refurbishment and use at the Nixon Facility.
Remaining proceeds are being used primarily to construct additional
new petroleum storage tanks at the Nixon Facility. The Second Term
Loan Due 2034, which is 100% USDA-guaranteed, is secured by: (i) a
second priority lien on the rights of LE in the crude distillation
tower and the other collateral of LE pursuant to a security
agreement; (ii) a first priority lien on the real property
interests of LRM; (iii) a first priority lien on all of LRM’s
fixtures, furniture, machinery and equipment; (iv) a first priority
lien on all of LRM’s contractual rights, general intangibles
and instruments, except with respect to LRM’s rights in its
leases of certain specified tanks, with respect to which Veritex
has a second priority lien in such leases subordinate to a prior
lien granted by LRM to Veritex to secure obligations of LRM under a
term loan that matured in 2017; and (v) all other collateral as
described in the security documents. The Second Term Loan Due 2034
contains representations and warranties, affirmative, restrictive,
and financial covenants, as well as events of default which are
customary for bank facilities of this type.
Pursuant
to a construction rider in the Second Term Loan Due 2034, proceeds
available for use were placed in a disbursement account whereby
Veritex makes payments for construction related expenses. Amounts
held in the disbursement account are reflected as restricted cash
(current portion) and restricted cash, noncurrent in our
consolidated balance sheets. (See "Note (18)
Subsequent Events" for additional disclosures related to the
Veritex secured loan agreements.)
Notre Dame Debt (In Default). LE entered a loan with Notre
Dame Investors, Inc. as evidenced by a promissory note that is
currently held by John Kissick (the “Notre Dame Debt”).
Key terms of the Notre Dame Debt are as follow:
Original
Principal Amount:
|
$8.0
million
|
Additional
Principal:
|
$3.7
million
|
Maturity
Date:
|
January
2018
|
Principal
and Interest Payment:
|
None;
payment rights subordinated to senior lender
|
Default
Interest Rate:
|
16.00%
|
Pursuant
to a Sixth Amendment to the Notre Dame Debt, entered on November
14, 2017 and made effective September 18, 2017, the Notre Dame Debt
was amended to increase the principal amount by $3.7 million (the
“Additional Principal”). The Additional Principal was
used to make payments to GEL to reduce the balance of the Final
Arbitration Award in the amount of $3.6 million in accordance with
the GEL Letter Agreement. Pursuant to a Subordination Agreement
dated June 2015, the holder of the Notre Dame Debt agreed to
subordinate its right to payments, as well as any security interest
and liens on the Nixon Facility’s business assets, in favor
of Veritex as holder of the First Term Loan Due 2034. To date, no
payments have been made to Notre Dame Investors, Inc. under the
Notre Dame Debt.
The
Notre Dame Debt is secured by a Deed of Trust, Security Agreement
and Financing Statements (the “Subordinated Deed of
Trust”), which encumbers the crude distillation tower and
general assets of LE. There are no financial maintenance
covenants associated with the Notre Dame Debt.
Capital Leases. In January 2018, LE entered a 24-month
capital lease for the purchase of a 20-ton crane for use at the
Nixon Facility. The lease requires a negligible monthly payment and
matures in January 2020.
28
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
A
summary of equipment held under long-term capital leases as of the
dates indicated follows:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Crane
|
$94
|
$94
|
Less:
accumulated depreciation
|
(17)
|
(14)
|
|
|
|
|
$77
|
$80
|
(12)
|
Asset Retirement Obligations
|
Refinery and Facilities. Management has concluded that there
is no legal or contractual obligation to dismantle or remove the
refinery and facilities assets. Management believes that the
refinery and facilities assets have indeterminate lives under FASB
ASC guidance for estimating AROs because dates or ranges of dates
upon which we would retire these assets cannot reasonably be
estimated at this time. When a legal or contractual obligation to
dismantle or remove the refinery and facilities assets arises and a
date or range of dates can reasonably be estimated for the
retirement of these assets, we will estimate the cost of performing
the retirement activities and record a liability for the fair value
of that cost using present value techniques.
Pipelines and Facilities and Oil and Gas Properties. We have
AROs associated with the dismantlement and abandonment in place of
our pipelines and facilities assets, as well as the plugging and
abandonment of our oil and gas properties. We recorded a discounted
liability for the fair value of an ARO with a corresponding
increase to the carrying value of the related long-lived asset at
the time the asset was installed or placed in service, and we
depreciated the amount added to property and equipment and
recognized accretion expense relating to the discounted liability
over the remaining life of the asset. At December 31, 2018, the
liability was fully accreted.
Due to
the length of inactivity of our pipelines and facilities assets,
BDPL is required by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
(“BOEM”) to abandon-in-place certain pipelines and
remove an anchor platform in federal waters. BDPL has been in
communications with BOEM and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement (“BSEE”) related to abandonment operations
and associated pipeline financial assurance requirements.
Management anticipates performing abandonment operations during
2019, however, timing depends several factors, including resource
availability and weather. As of the date of this Quarterly Report,
decommissioning work has not yet commenced.
Plugging
and abandonment costs are recorded during the period incurred or as
information becomes available to substantiate actual and/or
probable costs.
29
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Changes
to our ARO liability for the periods indicated were as
follows:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
retirement obligations, at the beginning of the period
|
$2,580
|
$2,315
|
Accretion
expense
|
-
|
265
|
|
2,580
|
2,580
|
Less:
asset retirement obligations, current portion
|
(2,580)
|
(2,580)
|
|
|
|
Long-term
asset retirement obligations, at the end of the period
|
$-
|
$-
|
(13)
|
Concentration of Risk
|
Bank Accounts. Financial instruments that potentially
subject us to concentrations of risk consist primarily of cash,
trade receivables and payables. We maintain our cash balances at
financial institutions located in Houston, Texas. In the U.S., the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”)
insures certain financial products up to a maximum of $250,000 per
depositor. At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had cash
balances (including restricted cash) of more than the FDIC
insurance limit per depositor in the amount of $1.2
million.
Key Supplier.
Operation
of the Nixon refinery depends on our ability to purchase adequate
amounts of crude oil and condensate, which is primarily dependent
on our liquidity and access to capital. We currently have in place
a month-to-month evergreen crude supply contract with a major
integrated oil and gas company. This supplier currently provides us
with adequate amounts of crude oil and condensate on favorable
terms, and we expect the supplier to continue to do so for the
foreseeable future. Our ability to
purchase adequate amounts of crude oil and condensate could be
adversely affected if the Settlement Agreement is terminated and
GEL seeks to confirm and enforce the Final Arbitration Award, as
well as other factors, including as net losses, working
capital deficits, and financial covenant defaults in secured loan
agreements.
Significant Customers. We routinely assess the financial
strength of our customers and have not experienced significant
write-downs in our accounts receivable balances. Therefore, we
believe that our accounts receivable credit risk exposure is
limited.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2019, we had 4 customers that
accounted for approximately 97% of our refined petroleum product
sales. LEH was 1 of these 4 significant customers and accounted for
approximately 31% of our refined petroleum product
sales. At March 31, 2019, these 4 customers represented
approximately $0.8 million in accounts receivable. LEH
represented approximately $0 in accounts receivable. LEH purchases
our jet fuel and resells the jet fuel to a government agency. LEH
bids for jet fuel contracts are evaluated under preferential
pricing terms due to its HUBZone certification. (See “Note
(9) Related-Party Transactions,” “Note (11) Long-Term
Debt, Net,” and “Note (17) Commitments and
Contingencies – Financing Agreements” for additional
disclosures related to LEH.)
For the
three months ended March 31, 2018, we had 3 customers that
accounted for approximately 77% of our refined petroleum product
sales. LEH was 1 of these 3 significant customers and accounted for
approximately 29% of our refined petroleum product
sales. At March 31, 2018, these 3 customers represented
approximately $0.3 million in accounts receivable. LEH
represented approximately $0.3 million in accounts
receivable.
30
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Refined Petroleum Product Sales. Our refined petroleum
products are primarily sold in the U.S. However, with the opening
of the Mexican diesel market to private companies, we occasionally
sell low-sulfur diesel to customers that export to Mexico. Total
refined petroleum product sales by distillation (from light to
heavy) for the periods indicated consisted of the
following:
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|||
|
2019
|
2018
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LPG
mix
|
$8
|
0.0%
|
$3
|
0.0%
|
Naphtha
|
13,795
|
20.3%
|
16,318
|
22.8%
|
Jet
fuel
|
20,809
|
30.7%
|
20,567
|
28.8%
|
HOBM
|
16,160
|
23.8%
|
16,429
|
23.0%
|
AGO
|
17,086
|
25.2%
|
18,195
|
25.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$67,858
|
100.0%
|
$71,512
|
100.0%
|
(14)
|
Leases
|
We
adopted the new lease accounting guidance using the modified
retrospective method and applied it to all leases based on the
contract terms in effect as of January 1, 2019. For existing
contracts, we carried forward our historical assessment of: (i)
whether contracts are or contain leases, (ii) lease classification,
and (iii) initial direct costs.
As of
March 31, 2019, BDSC had a single operating lease related to our
principal office space in Houston, Texas. The operating lease
expires in 2023. We have the option to extend the lease term for
one additional five (5) year period if notice of intent to extend
is provided to the lessor at least twelve (12) months before the
end of the current term. LEH subleases a portion of our leased
office space (see “Note (9) Related-Party Transactions”
related to the LEH office sub-lease agreement). Sublease
income received from LEH totaled $0.01 million for both three-month
periods ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.
We
recorded the related right-of-use asset and lease liability as the
present value of the fixed lease payments over the lease term.
Since the operating lease does not provide a readily-determinable
discount rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate to discount
lease payments to present value. The following table presents the
lease-related assets and liabilities recorded on the consolidated
balance sheet:
|
Classification
on
|
Three Months Ended
|
Operating
Lease
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
Assets
|
|
|
Right-of-use
assets
|
Operating
lease right-of-use assets
|
$754
|
Total
lease assets
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Current
|
Current
portion of long-term operating leases
|
164
|
Noncurrent
|
Long-term
operating leases, net of current portion
|
698
|
Total
lease liabilities
|
|
$862
|
|
|
Operating
Lease
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average remaining lease term in years
|
4.42
|
Weighted
average discount rate
|
8.25%
|
31
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Lease
costs for operating leases, which is recognized as part of
depreciation and amortization expense, totaled $0.05 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2019. Cash paid for amounts
included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities totaled
$0.05 million for the three months ended March 31,
2019.
As of
March 31, 2019, maturities of operating lease liabilities for the
periods indicated were as follows:
|
Operating Leases
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
2019
|
$171
|
2020
|
230
|
2021
|
234
|
2022
|
237
|
2023
|
161
|
|
|
Total
minimum rental payments
|
1,032
|
Less:
imputed interest
|
(171)
|
|
$862
|
(15)
|
Income Taxes
|
The
provision for income tax benefit (expense) as of the dates
indicated consisted of the following:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Federal
|
$-
|
$108
|
State
|
-
|
43
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Impact
of change in enacted tax rates
|
-
|
-
|
Change
in valuation allowance
|
-
|
109
|
Total
provision for income taxes
|
$-
|
$260
|
The
state of Texas has a Texas margins tax (“TMT”), which
is a form of business tax imposed on gross margin. Although TMT is
imposed on an entity’s gross profit rather than on its net
income, certain aspects of TMT make it like an income tax.
Accordingly, TMT is treated as an income tax for financial
reporting purposes.
Effective Tax Rate. Beginning in 2018, our effective tax
rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to
AMT credits made refundable by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. At the
date of enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, we re-measured our
deferred tax assets and liabilities using a rate of 21%, which is
the rate expected to be in place when such deferred assets and
liabilities are expected to reverse in the future. The
re-measurement was offset by a change in our valuation allowance,
resulting in there being no impact on our net deferred tax
assets.
32
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
Deferred
income taxes as of the dates indicated consisted of the
following:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
Net
operating loss and capital loss carryforwards
|
$11,479
|
$11,260
|
Accrued
arbitration award payable
|
2,586
|
2,850
|
Business
interest expense
|
833
|
704
|
Start-up
costs (crude oil and condensate processing facility)
|
657
|
678
|
Asset
retirement obligations liability/deferred revenue
|
541
|
542
|
AMT
credit and other
|
50
|
108
|
Total
deferred tax assets
|
16,146
|
16,142
|
|
|
|
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
|
|
Basis
differences in property and equipment
|
(5,409)
|
(5,153)
|
Total
deferred tax liabilities
|
(5,409)
|
(5,153)
|
|
|
|
|
10,737
|
10,989
|
|
|
|
Valuation
allowance
|
(10,687)
|
(10,881)
|
|
|
|
Deferred
tax assets, net
|
$50
|
$108
|
Deferred Income Taxes. Deferred income tax balances reflect
the effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts
of assets and liabilities and their tax basis, as well as from NOL
carryforwards. We state those balances at the enacted tax rates we
expect will be in effect when taxes are paid. NOL carryforwards and
deferred tax assets represent amounts available to reduce future
taxable income.
NOL Carryforwards. Under IRC Section 382, a corporation that
undergoes an “ownership change” is subject to
limitations on its use of pre-change NOL carryforwards to offset
future taxable income. Within the meaning of IRC Section 382, an
“ownership change” occurs when the aggregate stock
ownership of certain stockholders (generally 5% shareholders,
applying certain look-through rules) increases by more than fifty
(50) percentage points over such stockholders' lowest percentage
ownership during the testing period (generally three years). For
income tax purposes, we experienced ownership changes in 2005,
relating to a series of private placements, and in 2012, because of
a reverse acquisition, that limit the use of pre-change NOL
carryforwards to offset future taxable income. In general, the
annual use limitation equals the aggregate value of common stock at
the time of the ownership change multiplied by a specified
tax-exempt interest rate. The 2012 ownership change will subject
approximately $16.3 million in NOL carryforwards that were
generated prior to the ownership change to an annual use limitation
of approximately $0.6 million per year. Unused portions of the
annual use limitation amount may be used in subsequent years.
Because of the annual use limitation, approximately $6.7 million in
NOL carryforwards that were generated prior to the 2012 ownership
change will expire unused. NOL carryforwards that were generated
after the 2012 ownership change and prior to 2018 are not subject
to an annual use limitation under IRC Section 382 and may be used
for a period of 20 years in addition to available amounts of NOL
carryforwards generated prior to the ownership change. NOL
carryforwards that were generated after 2017 may only be used to
offset 80% of taxable income and are carried forward
indefinitely.
33
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
NOL
carryforwards that remained available for future use for the
periods indicated were as follow (amounts shown are net of NOLs
that will expire unused because of the IRC Section 382
limitation):
|
Net Operating Loss Carryforward
|
|
|
|
Pre-Ownership
Change
|
Post-Ownership Change
|
Total
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
||
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
$9,614
|
$30,219
|
$39,833
|
|
|
|
|
Net
operating losses
|
-
|
7,106
|
7,106
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2018
|
$9,614
|
$37,325
|
$46,939
|
|
|
|
|
Net
operating losses
|
-
|
1,036
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at March 31, 2019
|
$9,614
|
$38,361
|
$47,975
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance. As of each reporting date, management
considers new evidence, both positive and negative, to determine
the realizability of deferred tax assets. Management considers
whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all the
deferred tax assets will be realized, which is dependent upon the
generation of future taxable income prior to the expiration of any
NOL carryforwards. At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018,
management determined that cumulative losses incurred over the
prior three-year period provided significant objective evidence
that limited the ability to consider other subjective evidence,
such as projections for future growth. Based on this evaluation, we
recorded a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets for
which realization was not deemed more likely than not as of March
31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
(16)
|
Earnings Per Share
|
A
reconciliation between basic and diluted income per share for the
periods indicated was as follows:
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands, except share and per share
amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$747
|
$(151)
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share
|
$0.07
|
$(0.01)
|
|
|
|
Basic
and Diluted
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares of
|
|
|
common
stock outstanding and potential
|
|
|
dilutive
shares of common stock
|
10,975,514
|
10,925,513
|
Diluted
EPS is computed by dividing net income available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common
stock outstanding. Diluted EPS for three months ended March 31,
2019 and 2018 was the same as basic EPS as there were no stock
options or other dilutive instruments outstanding.
34
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
(17)
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
Legal Matters.
Final Arbitration Award and Settlement Agreement. See
“Note (1) Organization – Going Concern – Final
Arbitration Award and Settlement Agreement” and "Part II,
Item 1. Legal Proceedings” for additional disclosures related
to the Final Arbitration Award and the Settlement
Agreement.
Veritex Secured Loan Agreement Events of Default. See
“Note (1) Organization – Going Concern – Defaults
under Secured Loan Agreements” and “Note (11) Long-Term
Debt, Net” for disclosures related to defaults under Veritex
secured loan agreements.
Other Legal Matters. We are involved in lawsuits, claims,
and proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business,
including mechanic’s liens, contract-related disputes,
administrative proceedings, and financial assurance (bonding)
requirements with regulatory bodies. Management is in discussion
with all concerned parties and does not believe that such matters
will have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
earnings, or cash flows. However,
there can be no assurance that such discussions will result in a
manageable outcome or that we will be able to meet financial
assurance (bonding) requirements. If Veritex does not approve the
Settlement or exercises its rights and remedies under the secured
loan agreements or if the Settlement Agreement with GEL is
terminated and GEL seeks to confirm and enforce the Final
Arbitration Award, our business, financial condition, and results
of operations will be materially adversely affected, and Blue
Dolphin and its affiliates would likely be required to seek
protection under bankruptcy laws.
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement. See “Note
(9) Related-Party Transactions” for additional disclosures
related to the Amended and Restated Operating
Agreement.
Financing Agreements. See “Note (11) Long-Term Debt,
Net” for additional disclosures related to financing
agreements.
Guarantees. LEH and Jonathan Carroll provided guarantees on
certain Blue Dolphin-related long-term debt. The maximum amount of
any guarantee is reduced as payments are made. See “Note (11)
Long-Term Debt, Net” for additional disclosures related to
guarantees.
Health, Safety and Environmental Matters. Our operations are
subject to extensive federal, state, and local environmental,
health, and safety regulations governing, among other things, the
generation, storage, handling, use and transportation of petroleum
products and hazardous substances; the emission and discharge of
materials into the environment; waste management; characteristics
and composition of jet fuel and other products; and the monitoring,
reporting and control of air emissions. Our operations also require
numerous permits and authorizations under various environmental,
health, and safety laws and regulations. Failure to obtain and
comply with these permits or environmental, health, or safety laws
generally could result in fines, penalties or other sanctions, or a
revocation of our permits.
Nixon Facility Expansion. We have made and continue to make
capital and efficiency improvements at the Nixon Facility.
Therefore, we incurred and will continue to incur capital
expenditures related to these improvements, which include, among
other things, facility and land improvements and completion of a
petroleum storage tank.
Supplemental Pipeline Bonds. In a letter dated March 30,
2018, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (“BOEM”)
ordered BDPL to provide additional supplemental bonds or acceptable
financial assurance of approximately $4.8 million (the
“Separate Orders”) within sixty (60) calendar days of
receipt of the letter. The Separate Orders relate to five (5)
existing pipeline rights-of-way. BOEM issued an INC for each
Separate Order dated June 8, 2018 and received by BDPL on June 11,
2018. BOEM asserts that the INCs authorize BOEM to impose financial
penalties on BDPL if it does not comply with the Separate Orders
within twenty (20) days. BOEM asserts that potential penalties
accrue for each day BDPL failed to comply after June 28,
2018. BDPL appealed the INCs on August 8, 2018. The
Interior Board of Land Appeals (the “IBLA”) has granted
five extension requests that extend BDPL’s deadline for
filing a Statement of Reasons with the IBLA until July 21, 2019.
BDPL’s pending appeal of the INCs does not relieve BDPL of
its obligations to provide additional financial assurance in
accordance with the Separate Orders, or of BOEM’s authority
to impose financial penalties.
35
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
BDPL
has initiated settlement discussions with BOEM to resolve the
Separate Orders and the INCs. There can be no assurance that BOEM
will: (i) accept a proposal for a reduced amount of supplemental
financial assurance, (ii) not require additional supplemental
pipeline bonds related to BDPL’s existing pipeline
rights-of-way, and/or (iii) not impose penalties under the INCs. As
a result, we are unable to predict the outcome of the Separate
Orders, the settlement discussions with BOEM or their ultimate
impact, if any, on our business, financial condition or results of
operations. Accordingly, we have not recorded a liability on our
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2019. As of March 31,
2019 and December 31, 2018, BDPL maintained approximately $0.9
million in credit and cash-backed pipeline rights-of-way bonds
issued to the BOEM. If BDPL is required by BOEM to provide
significant additional supplemental bonds or acceptable financial
assurance or is assessed significant penalties under the INCs, we
will experience a significant and material adverse effect on our
operations, liquidity, and financial condition.
(18)
|
Subsequent Events
|
Line of Credit Agreement
On May
3, 2019, NPS and Pilot Travel Centers LLC (“Pilot”)
entered into a Line of Credit, Guarantee and Security Agreement
(the “Line of Credit”), whereby Pilot agreed to extend
a line of credit to NPS in an aggregate principal amount of up to
$12.8 million. The Line of Credit will primarily be used to finance
NPS' purchase of crude oil from Pilot pursuant to certain purchase
and supply agreements (the "Pilot Supply Agreements") and to
provide working capital. The Line of
Credit is secured by (i) NPS receivables, (ii) NPS assets,
including a tank lease (the “Tank Lease”), and (iii)
LRM receivables. On May 3, 2019,
as an inducement to Pilot’s entry into the Line of Credit,
Blue Dolphin and Pilot entered into a Pledge Agreement (the
“Pledge Agreement”) whereby Blue Dolphin pledged its
equity interests in NPS to Pilot to secure NPS’ obligations
under the Line of Credit.
On May
10, 2019, LE, NPS, Pilot and Veritex entered into a Subordination
and Attornment Agreement (the “Subordination
Agreement”), providing that, if Veritex in its capacity as a
secured lender of LE and LRM were to foreclose on LE property that
NPS was leasing from LE pursuant to the Tank Lease, Veritex would
permit the continued performance of obligations under the Tank
Lease so long as certain conditions are met. The effectiveness of
the Subordination Agreement is subject to certain conditions,
including the agreement and concurrence of the USDA.
Veritex Consent
In a
notice to obligors dated April 30, 2019 (the "Veritex Consent'),
Veritex agreed, subject to the agreement and concurrence of the
USDA and the replenishment of a payment reserve account required by
the loan agreements on or before August 31, 2019, to waive certain
covenant defaults and forbear from enforcing its remedies under the
secured loan agreements. Any exercise by Veritex of its rights and
remedies under such secured loan agreements would have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations and would likely require Blue Dolphin to seek protection
under bankruptcy laws. See “Note (1) Organization –
Going Concern” and “–Operating Risks” and
“Note (11) Long-Term Debt, Net” for additional
disclosures related to the First Term Loan Due 2034 and Second Term
Loan Due 2034 and financial covenant violations.
Fifth Amendment to Settlement Agreement
As
previously reported, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, GEL and
the Lazarus Parties agreed to mutually release all claims against
each other and to file a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice in
connection with the Final Arbitration Award, subject to the terms
and conditions set forth in the Settlement Agreement, including
payment by the Lazarus Parties to GEL of the Settlement Payment. On
May 6, 2019, the Lazarus Parties and GEL entered into a Fifth
Amendment to the Settlement Agreement (the “Fifth
Amendment”). The Fifth Amendment provides for, among other
things, GEL’s consent to the Lazarus Parties entering into
the Line of Credit and an extension to October 31, 2019 of the date
on which the Settlement Agreement will terminate if the Settlement
Payment and a $0.5 million deferred interim installment payment
(the "Deferred Interim Installment Payment") are not made on or
before such date. As of the filing date of this Quarterly Report,
the Lazarus Parties had paid GEL the Settlement Payment. The
Deferred Interim Installment Payment must therefore be paid no
later than October 31, 2019. Under the Fifth Amendment, GEL has the
right to terminate the Settlement Agreement earlier following the
occurence of an event of default. See “Note (1)
Organization–Going Concern–Final Arbitration Award and
Settlement Agreement” for further information regarding the
Settlement Agreement.
The
foregoing description of the Line of Credit, the Pilot Supply
Agreements, the Pledge Agreement, the Subordination Agreement, the
Veritex Consent and the Fifth Amendment does not purport to be
complete. As promptly as reasonably practicable after the filing of
this Quarterly Report, Blue Dolphin intends to file a Current
Report on Form 8-K providing additional information regarding the
material terms of these documents, and the foregoing description is
qualified in its entirety by reference to that Current Report on
Form 8-K.
36
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2019 (the Quarterly Report”), references to
“Blue Dolphin,” “we,” “us” and
“our” are to Blue Dolphin Energy Company and its
subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise
requires. You should read the following discussion together with
the financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere
in this Quarterly Report, as well as with the risk factors,
financial statements, and related notes included thereto in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2018 (the “Annual Report”).
Forward Looking Statements
Certain
statements included in this Quarterly Report, including in this
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1935. Forward-looking statements represent
management’s beliefs and assumptions based on currently
available information. Forward-looking statements relate to
matters such as our industry, business strategy, goals and
expectations concerning our market position, future operations,
margins, profitability, capital expenditures, liquidity and capital
resources, access to supplies of crude oil and condensate,
commitments and contingencies, and other financial and operating
information. We have used the words “anticipate,”
“assume,” “believe,” “budget,”
“continue,” “could,”
“estimate,” “expect,” “intend,”
“may,” “plan,” “potential,”
“predict,” “project,” “will,”
“future,” and similar terms and phrases to identify
forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking
statements reflect our current expectations regarding future
events, results, or outcomes. These expectations may or may not be
realized. Some of these expectations may be based upon assumptions
or judgments that prove to be incorrect. In addition, our business
and operations involve numerous risks and uncertainties, many of
which are beyond our control, which could result in our
expectations not being realized, or materially affect our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows. Actual
events, results and outcomes may differ materially from our
expectations due to a variety of factors. Although it is not
possible to identify all these factors, they include, among others,
the following and other factors described under the heading
“Risk Factors” in the Annual Report and this Quarterly
Report:
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
●
Failure to meet the
terms and conditions set forth in the Settlement Agreement,
including but not limited to securing the Settlement Financing,
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations and could materially adversely
affect the value of an investment in our common stock. (See
“Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note (1)
Organization – Going Concern – Final Arbitration Award
and Settlement Agreement” for disclosures related to the
Settlement Agreement).
●
Inadequate
liquidity to sustain operations due to the unfavorable outcome in
the arbitration of the contract-related dispute with GEL, net
losses, working capital deficits, and other factors, including
defaults under secured loan agreements, any of which could have a
material adverse effect on us.
●
Defaults under our
secured loan agreements could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, and results of operations and
materially adversely affect the value of an investment in our
common stock.
●
Our substantial
debt in the current portion of long-term debt, which is currently
in default, could adversely affect our financial health and make us
more vulnerable to adverse economic conditions.
●
Our business,
financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected
by increased costs of capital or a reduction in the availability of
credit.
●
LEH holds a
significant interest in us, and related-party transactions with LEH
and its affiliates may cause conflicts of interest that may
adversely affect us.
●
The dangers
inherent in oil and gas operations could expose us to potentially
significant losses, costs or liabilities and reduce our
liquidity.
●
The geographic
concentration of our assets creates a significant exposure to the
risks of the regional economy and other regional adverse
conditions.
●
Competition from
companies having greater financial and other resources could
materially and adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
37
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
●
Environmental laws
and regulations could require us to make substantial capital
expenditures to remain in compliance or to remediate current or
future contamination that could give rise to material
liabilities.
●
We are subject to
strict laws and regulations regarding personnel and process safety,
and failure to comply with these laws and regulations could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and profitability.
●
Our insurance
policies may be inadequate or expensive.
●
Our ability to use
net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards to offset
future taxable income for U.S. federal income tax purposes is
subject to limitation.
●
Terrorist attacks,
cyber-attacks, threats of war, or actual war may negatively affect
our operations, financial condition, results of operations, and
cash flows.
Risks Related to Our Operations
●
Management has
determined that there is, and the report of our independent
registered public accounting firm expresses, substantial doubt
about our ability to continue as a going concern.
●
Refining margins
are volatile, and a reduction in refining margins will adversely
affect the amount of cash we will have available for working
capital.
●
The price
volatility of crude oil, other feedstocks, refined petroleum
products, and fuel and utility services may have a material adverse
effect on our earnings, cash flows and liquidity.
●
Our future success
depends on our ability to acquire sufficient levels of crude oil on
favorable terms to operate the Nixon refinery.
●
Downtime at the
Nixon refinery could result in lost margin opportunity, increased
maintenance expense, increased inventory, and a reduction in cash
available for payment of our obligations.
●
We may have capital
needs for which our internally generated cash flows and other
sources of liquidity may not be adequate. Further, LEH and its
affiliates (including Jonathan Carroll) may, but are not required
to, fund our working capital requirements in the event our
internally generated cash flows and other sources of liquidity are
inadequate.
●
Our business may
suffer if any of the executive officers or other key personnel
discontinue employment with us. Furthermore, a shortage of skilled
labor or disruptions in our labor force may make it difficult for
us to maintain productivity.
●
Loss of market
share by a key customer, one of which is LEH, or consolidation
among our customer base could harm our operating
results.
●
The sale of refined
petroleum products to the wholesale market is our primary business,
and if we fail to maintain and grow the market share of our refined
petroleum products, our operating results could
suffer.
●
We are dependent on
third parties for the transportation of crude oil and condensate
into and refined petroleum products out of our Nixon Facility, and
if these third parties become unavailable to us, our ability to
process crude oil and condensate and sell refined petroleum
products to wholesale markets could be materially and adversely
affected.
●
Our suppliers
source a substantial amount, if not all, of our crude oil and
condensate from the Eagle Ford Shale and may experience
interruptions of supply from that region.
●
Our refining
operations and customers are primarily located within the Eagle
Ford Shale and changes in the supply/demand balance in this region
could result in lower refining margins.
●
Regulation of GHG
emissions could increase our operational costs and reduce demand
for our products.
Risks Related to Our Pipelines and Oil and Gas
Properties
●
Orders by BOEM to
increase bonds or other sureties to maintain compliance with
BOEM’s regulations, or the assessment of penalties for
failure to do so, could significantly impact our operations,
liquidity, and financial condition.
●
More stringent
requirements imposed by BOEM and BSEE related to the
decommissioning, plugging, and abandonment of wells, platforms, and
pipelines could materially increase our estimate of future
AROs.
Any one
of these factors or a combination of these factors could materially
affect our future results of operations and could influence whether
any forward-looking statements ultimately prove to be accurate. Our
forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance, and actual results and future performance may differ
materially from those suggested in any forward-looking statements.
We do not intend to update these statements unless we are required
to do so.
38
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Going Concern
See
“Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note (1)
Organization – Going Concern” and "Note (18) Subsequent
Events" regarding factors management
has determined raise substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern.
Operating Risks
See
“Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note (1)
Organization – Operating Risks” and "Note (18)
Subsequent Events" regarding factors that have negatively
impacted execution of our business plan.
Company Overview
Blue
Dolphin is a publicly-traded Delaware corporation primarily engaged
in the refining and marketing of petroleum products. We also
provide tolling and storage terminaling services. Our assets, which
are located in Nixon, Texas, primarily include a 15,000-bpd crude
distillation tower and approximately 1.1 million bbls of petroleum
storage tanks (collectively the “Nixon Facility”).
Pipeline transportation and oil and gas operations are no longer
active. Blue Dolphin maintains a website at
http://www.blue-dolphin-energy.com. Information on or
accessible through Blue Dolphin’s website is not incorporated
by reference in or otherwise made a part of this Quarterly
Report.
Major Influences on Results of Operations
Refinery Operations
As a
margin-based business, our refinery operations are primarily
affected by gross profit per bbl, product slate, and refinery
downtime.
Price Differentials per Bbl
Gross
profit per bbl, which reflects the dollar per bbl price difference
between crude oil and condensate (input) and refined petroleum
products (output), is the most significant driver of refining
margins, and they have historically been subject to wide
fluctuations. Our per bbl cost to acquire crude oil and condensate
and the dollar per bbl price for which our refined petroleum
products are ultimately sold depend on the economics of supply and
demand. Supply and demand are affected by numerous factors, most,
if not all, of which are beyond our control,
including:
●
Domestic and
foreign market conditions, political affairs, and economic
developments;
●
Import supply
levels and export opportunities;
●
Existing domestic
inventory levels;
●
Operating and
production levels of competing refineries;
●
Expansion and/or
upgrades of competitors’ facilities;
●
Governmental
regulations (e.g., mandated renewable fuels standards, proposed
climate change laws and regulations, and increased mileage
standards for vehicles);
●
Weather
conditions;
●
Availability of and
access to transportation infrastructure;
●
Availability of
competing fuels (e.g., renewables); and
●
Seasonal
fluctuations.
Product Slate
Management periodically determines whether to change the
refinery’s product mix, as well as maintain, increase, or
decrease inventory levels based on various factors. These factors
include the crude oil pricing market in the U.S. Gulf Coast region,
the refined petroleum products market in the same region, the
relationship between these two markets, fulfilling contract
demands, and other factors that may impact our operations,
financial condition, and cash flows.
39
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Refinery Downtime
The safe and reliable operation of the refinery is key to our
financial performance and results of operations, and we are
particularly vulnerable to disruptions in our operations because
all our refining operations are conducted at a single facility.
Although operating at anticipated levels, the refinery is still in
a recommissioning phase and may require unscheduled downtime for
unanticipated reasons, including maintenance and repairs, voluntary
regulatory compliance measures, or cessation or suspension by
regulatory authorities.
Occasionally, the Nixon refinery experiences a temporary shutdown
due to power outages from high winds and thunderstorms. In such
cases, we must initiate a standard refinery start-up process, which
can last several days. We are typically able to resume normal
operations the next day. Any scheduled or unscheduled downtime will
result in lost margin opportunity, potential increased maintenance
expense and a reduction of refined petroleum products inventory,
which could reduce our ability to meet our payment
obligations.
Tolling and Terminaling Operations
The Nixon Facility’s petroleum storage tanks and
infrastructure are primarily suited for crude oil and condensate
and refined petroleum products, such as naphtha, jet fuel, diesel
and fuel oil. Our storage terminaling operations are primarily
affected by:
●
price
(in terms of storage fees) and available capacity;
●
industry
factors including changes in the prices of petroleum products that
affect demand for storage services; and
●
utilization
rates of our competitors (local demand).
Key Relationships
Relationship with LEH
Blue
Dolphin and certain of its subsidiaries are currently parties to a
variety of agreements with LEH and its affiliates and a
counter-party. Related-party agreements with LEH include: (i) an
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement with Blue Dolphin and LE,
(ii) a Jet Fuel Sales Agreement with LE, (iii) a Loan Agreement
with BDPL, (iv) an Amended and Restated Promissory Note with Blue
Dolphin, and (v) an office sub-lease agreement with BDSC. In
addition, we currently rely on advances from LEH and its affiliates
(including Jonathan Carroll) to fund our working capital
requirements. There can be no assurances that LEH and its
affiliates will continue to fund our working capital requirements.
(See “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note (9)
Related-Party Transactions” for additional disclosures
related to agreements that we have in place with LEH and its
affiliates.)
Relationship with Crude Supplier
Operation
of the Nixon refinery depends on our ability to purchase adequate
amounts of crude oil and condensate, which is primarily dependent
on our liquidity and access to capital. We currently have in place
a month-to-month evergreen crude supply contract with a major
integrated oil and gas company. This supplier currently provides us
with adequate amounts of crude oil and condensate on favorable
terms, and we expect the supplier to continue to do so for the
foreseeable future. Our ability to purchase adequate amounts of
crude oil and condensate could be adversely affected if the
Settlement Agreement is terminated and GEL seeks to confirm and
enforce the Final Arbitration Award, as well as other factors, including as net
losses, working capital deficits, and financial covenant defaults
in secured loan agreements.
Management
believes that it is taking the appropriate steps to improve our
operations and financial stability. If our business strategy is
unsuccessful, it could affect our ability to acquire adequate
supplies of crude oil and condensate under the existing contract or
otherwise. Further, because our existing crude supply contract is a
month-to-month arrangement, there can be no assurance that crude
oil and condensate supplies will continue to be available under
this contract in the future.
40
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Results of Operations
Certain
Prior Quarter amounts as defined herein have been reclassified in
order to conform to the Current Quarter presentation. Specifically,
certain changes to the presentation of prior period statements of
operations have been made to conform to the current period
presentation, primarily relating to: (i) a retitling from
‘cost of sales’ to ‘cost of goods sold,’
which includes all costs directly attributable to the generation of
the related revenue, as defined by GAAP and (ii) a breakout of the
‘management fee’ under the Amended and Restated
Operating Agreement, which was previously reported within
‘refinery operating expenses’. These changes had no
effect on the reported results of operations.
Consolidated Results
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 (the “Current
Quarter”) Compared to March 31, 2018 (the “Prior
Quarter”).
Total Revenue from Operations. For the Current Quarter, we
had total revenue from operations of $68.9 million compared to
total revenue from operations of $72.2 million for the Prior
Quarter, a decrease of nearly 5%. Approximately 99% of our revenue
is derived from refinery operations while 1% is derived from
tolling and terminaling. Refinery operations revenue decreased
approximately $3.7 million in the Current Quarter compared to the
Prior Quarter. The decrease in refinery operations revenue was due
to lower commodity pricing per bbl on refined petroleum products
sold, which was partially decreased by higher sales volume in the
Current Quarter compared to the Prior Quarter. For the same period,
tolling and terminaling revenue increased approximately $0.3
million, or approximately 46%, as a result of increased storage
fees under new and renewed customer agreements.
Total Cost of Goods Sold. Total cost of goods sold was $65.5
million for the Current Quarter compared to $70.5 million for the
Prior Quarter. The 7% decrease in total cost of goods sold in the
Current Quarter compared to the Prior Quarter related to lower
commodity prices per bbl for crude oil and chemicals, which was
partially offset by increased throughput volume.
Gross Profit / Gross Margin. For the Current Quarter, gross
profit totaled $3.4 million, or approximately 5%, compared to gross
profit of $1.8 million, or approximately 2%, for the Prior Quarter.
The increase in gross profit between the periods primarily related
to more favorable margins per bbl and increased tank rental revenue
in the Current Quarter compared to the Prior Quarter.
Management Fee. The management fee under the Amended and
Restated Operating Agreement was flat, totaling approximately $0.2
million in both the Current Quarter and the Prior Quarter. (See
“Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note (9)
Related-Party Transactions” for additional disclosures
related to the Amended and Restated Operating
Agreement.)
General and Administrative Expenses. General and
administrative expenses were flat in the Current Quarter compared
to the Prior Quarter at $0.7 million.
Depreciation and Amortization. We recorded depreciation and
amortization expenses of $0.6 million in the Current Quarter
compared to $0.5 million in the Prior Quarter, an increase of
approximately 30%. The increase related to placement in service of
a new boiler and new petroleum storage tanks.
Other Expense. Total other
expense was $1.0 million in the Current Quarter compared to $0.7
million in the Prior Quarter. Nearly all of other expense related
to interest expense associated with the secured loan agreements
with Veritex and related-party debt.
Income Tax Benefit. We recognized an income tax benefit of
$0 in the Current Quarter compared to $0.2 million in the Prior
Quarter. Income tax benefit in the Prior Quarter related to a
refundable Alternative Minimum Tax that was paid in prior periods.
(See “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note (15)
Income Taxes” for additional disclosures related to income
taxes.)
41
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Net Income (Loss). For the Current Quarter, we reported net
income of $0.7 million, or income of $0.07 per share, compared to a
net loss of $0.2 million, or loss of $0.01 per share, for the Prior
Quarter. The increase in net income between the periods was
primarily attributable to more favorable margins per bbl, increased
sales throughput volume, and increased tank rental revenue in the
Current Quarter compared to the Prior Quarter.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
To supplement our consolidated results, management uses refining
gross profit per bbl, a non-GAAP financial measure, to help
investors evaluate our core operating results and allow for greater
transparency in reviewing our overall financial, operational and
economic performance. Refining gross profit per bbl is reconciled
to GAAP-based results below. Refining gross profit per bbl should
not be considered an alternative for GAAP results. Refining gross
profit per bbl is provided to enhance an overall understanding of
our core financial performance for the applicable periods and is an
indicator that management believes is relevant and useful. Refining
gross profit per bbl may differ from similar calculations used by
other companies within the petroleum industry, thereby limiting its
usefulness as a comparative measure. (See “Part I, Item 1.
Financial Statements” for comparative GAAP
results.)
Refining Gross Profit per Bbl – For the Current
Quarter, refining gross profit per bbl was $2.28 compared to $1.03
per bbl for the Prior Quarter, reflecting an increase of $1.25 per
bbl. The increase between the periods primarily related to more
favorable refining margins per bbl and increased sales throughput
volume in the Current Quarter compared to the Prior Quarter. (See
“Glossary of Selected Energy and Financial Terms” in
this Quarterly Report for the definition of gross margin per
bbl.)
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands except per bbl amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
Refinery
operations revenue
|
$67,858
|
$71,512
|
Less:
Total cost of goods sold
|
(65,516)
|
(70,492)
|
|
2,342
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
Sales
(Bbls)
|
1,029
|
993
|
|
|
|
Gross
Margin per Bbl
|
$2.28
|
$1.03
|
Remainder
of Page Intentionally Left Blank
42
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Refinery Operations Throughput and Production Data
Operational metrics
for the refinery for the periods indicated were as
follow:
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Days
|
90
|
90
|
Refinery
downtime
|
(11)
|
(16)
|
Operating
Days
|
79
|
74
|
|
|
|
Total
refinery throughput (bbls)
|
1,047,059
|
1,008,443
|
Operating days:
|
|
|
bpd
|
13,254
|
13,628
|
Capacity
utilization rate
|
88.4%
|
90.9%
|
Calendar days:
|
|
|
bpd
|
11,634
|
11,205
|
Capacity
utilization rate
|
77.6%
|
74.7%
|
|
|
|
Total
refinery production (bbls)
|
1,022,829
|
978,552
|
Operating days:
|
|
|
bpd
|
12,947
|
13,224
|
Capacity
utilization rate
|
86.3%
|
88.2%
|
Calendar days:
|
|
|
bpd
|
11,365
|
10,873
|
Capacity
utilization rate
|
75.8%
|
72.5%
|
Note:
|
The
small difference between total refinery throughput (volume
processed as input) and total refinery production (volume processed
as output) represents a combination of multiple factors including
refinery fuel use, elimination of some impurities originally
present in the crude oil, loss, and other factors.
|
During
the Current Quarter, the refinery experienced 11 days of downtime
primarily related to a maintenance turnaround and equipment
repairs. During the Prior Quarter, the refinery experienced 16 days
of downtime related to repair and maintenance of the naphtha
stabilizer unit and short maintenance turnarounds.
For the
Current Quarter compared to the Prior Quarter, total refinery
throughput bbls and total refinery production bbls increased
primarily as a result of less downtime.
Refined Petroleum Product Sales Summary.
See
“Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note (13)
Concentration of Risk” for a discussion of refined petroleum
product sales.
43
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview.
We
currently rely on revenue from operations, LEH and its affiliates
(including Jonathan Carroll), and borrowings under bank facilities
to meet our liquidity needs. Primary uses of cash include: (i)
payment to LEH for our direct operating expenses under the Amended
and Restated Operating Agreement, (ii) payments on long-term debt
and the Final Arbitration Award, (iii) purchase of crude oil and
condensate, and (iv) construction in progress.
As
discussed elsewhere within this “Liquidity and Capital
Resources” section, management has determined that there is
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern
due to consecutive quarterly net losses, inadequate working
capital, the Final Arbitration Award, and defaults under secured
loan agreements. See “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements
– Note (1) Organization – Going Concern”
and
"Note (18) Subsequent Events" for additional disclosures
related to the Final Arbitration Award, the Settlement Agreement
with GEL, defaults under secured loan agreements, and the going
concern.
Management believes that it is taking the appropriate steps to
improve our operations and financial stability. If our business
strategy is unsuccessful, it could affect our ability to acquire
adequate supplies of crude oil and condensate under our existing
contract or otherwise. Further, because our existing crude supply
contract is an evergreen arrangement, there can be no assurance
that crude oil and condensate supplies will continue to be
available under our crude supply contract in the
future.
Our results of operations and liquidity are highly dependent upon
the margins that we receive for our refined petroleum products.
The dollar per bbl price difference between crude oil and
condensate (input) and refined petroleum products (output), is the
most significant driver of refining margins, and they have
historically been subject to wide fluctuations. There can be no assurance that margins for refined
petroleum products will be favorable, LEH and its affiliates will
continue to fund our working capital needs in periods of working
capital deficits, or we will be able to obtain additional financing
on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Further, if Veritex
Community Bank (“Veritex”) does not approve the
Settlement or the Settlement Agreement with GEL is terminated and
GEL seeks to confirm and enforce the Final Arbitration Award, our
business, financial condition, and results of operations will be
materially adversely affected, and Blue Dolphin would likely be
required to seek protection under bankruptcy
laws.
Crude Oil and Condensate Supply.
Operation
of the Nixon refinery depends on our ability to purchase adequate
amounts of crude oil and condensate, which is primarily dependent
on our liquidity and access to capital. We currently have in place
a month-to-month evergreen crude supply contract with a major
integrated oil and gas company. This supplier currently provides us
with adequate amounts of crude oil and condensate on favorable
terms, and we expect the supplier to continue to do so for the
foreseeable future. Our ability to purchase adequate amounts of
crude oil and condensate could be adversely affected if the
Settlement Agreement is terminated and GEL seeks to confirm and
enforce the Final Arbitration Award, as well as other factors,
including net losses, working capital deficits, and financial
covenant defaults in secured loan agreements.
44
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Cash Flow.
Our
cash flow from operations for the periods indicated was as
follows:
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
|
$1,665
|
$2,146
|
|
|
|
Cash
flow from operations
|
|
|
Adjusted
profit from operations
|
1,369
|
185
|
Change
in assets and current liabilities
|
(1,400)
|
616
|
|
|
|
Total
cash flow from operations
|
(31)
|
801
|
|
|
|
Cash
inflows (outflows)
|
|
|
Payments
on debt
|
(250)
|
(240)
|
Net
activity on related-party debt
|
419
|
217
|
Capital
expenditures
|
(123)
|
(540)
|
|
|
|
Total
cash inflows (outflows)
|
46
|
(563)
|
|
|
|
Total
change in cash flows
|
15
|
238
|
|
|
|
Ending
cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
|
$1,680
|
$2,384
|
For the
Current Quarter, we experienced a cash flow deficit of $0.03
million compared to cash flow from operations of $0.8 million for
the Prior Quarter. The $0.8 million decrease in cash flow from
operations between the periods was primarily the result of an
increase in inventory and accounts receivable.
Working Capital.
We had
a working capital deficit of $70.7 million at March 31, 2019,
compared to a working capital deficit of $71.9 million at December
31, 2018. Excluding the current portion of long-term debt, we had a
working capital deficit of $28.6 million and $30.0 million at March
31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
As
discussed elsewhere within this “Liquidity and Capital
Resources” section, the Final Arbitration Award has affected
our ability to obtain working capital through financing.
If the Settlement Agreement with GEL
is terminated and GEL seeks to confirm and enforce the Final
Arbitration Award: (i) our business operations, including crude oil
and condensate procurement and our customer relationships;
financial condition; and results of operations will be materially
affected, and (ii) Blue Dolphin and its affiliates would likely be
required to seek protection under bankruptcy
laws.
We
currently rely on LEH and its affiliates (including Jonathan
Carroll) to fund our working capital requirements. There can be no
assurance that LEH and its affiliates (including Jonathan Carroll)
will continue to fund our working capital
requirements.
45
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Capital Spending.
Since
2015, the Nixon Facility has been undergoing a capital improvement
expansion project. Capital improvements have primarily related to
construction of new petroleum storage tanks to significantly
increase petroleum storage capacity. However, smaller efficiency
improvements have been made as well. Increased petroleum storage
capacity: (i) assists with de-bottlenecking the facility, (ii)
supports increased refinery throughput up to approximately 30,000
bpd, and (iii) provides an opportunity to generate additional
tolling and terminaling revenue. When the expansion project is
complete, petroleum storage capacity at the Nixon Facility will
exceed 1.2 million bbls, an increase of more than 0.9 million
bbls.
For the
next 12 to 18 months, we expect to continue to incur capital expenditures related to
facility and land improvements and completion of an unfinished
petroleum storage tank. Capital spending at the Nixon
Facility is being funded by working capital derived from revenue
from operations and LEH and its affiliates (including Jonathan
Carroll), as well as from long-term debt from Veritex that was
secured in 2015 for expansion of the Nixon Facility. Unused amounts
under the Veritex loans are reflected in restricted cash (current
and non-current portions) on our consolidated balance sheets and
will be available for use once events of default associated with
the Final Arbitration Award are remedied. See “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements
– Note (11) Long-Term Debt, Net” for additional
disclosures related to borrowings for capital
spending.
We
account for our capital expenditures in accordance with GAAP. We
also distinguish between capital expenditures that are for
maintenance and those that are for expansion. We classify a capital
expenditure as maintenance if it maintains capacity or throughput.
A classification of expansion is used if the capital expenditure is
expected to increase capacity or throughput. The distinction
between maintenance and expansion is made consistent with our
accounting policies and is generally a straightforward process.
However, in certain circumstances the distinction can be a matter
of management judgment and discretion.
Budgeting
and approval of maintenance capital expenditures is done throughout
the year on a project-by-project basis. We budget for and make
maintenance capital expenditures that are necessary to maintain
safe and efficient operations, meet customer needs and comply with
operating policies and applicable law. We may budget for and make
additional maintenance capital expenditures that we expect to
produce economic benefits such as increasing efficiency and/or
lowering future expenses. Budgeting and approval of expansion
capital expenditures are generally made periodically on a
project-by-project basis in response to specific investment
opportunities identified by our business segments.
Contractual Obligations and Debt Agreements.
See the
following notes under “Part I, Item 1. Financial
Statements” regarding:
●
GEL. “Note (1) Organization – Going
Concern – Final Arbitration Award and Settlement
Agreement” for disclosures related to the Final Arbitration
Award to GEL and Settlement Agreement with GEL.
●
Related-Party. “Note (9)
Related-Party Transactions” for a summary of the agreements
we have in place with related parties.
●
Long-Term Debt. “Note (11)
Long-Term Debt, Net” for a summary of our long-term
debt.
●
Operating Lease. “Note (14)
Leases” for disclosures related to our operating
lease.
●
Supplemental Pipeline Bonds.
“Note (17) Commitments and Contingencies – Supplemental
Pipeline Bonds” for a discussion of supplemental pipeline
bonding requirements.
46
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Indebtedness.
The principal balances outstanding plus accrued interest on our
long-term debt, net (including related-party) for the periods
indicated were as follow:
|
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
First
Term Loan Due 2034 (in default)
|
$22,551
|
$22,593
|
Second
Term Loan Due 2034 (in default)
|
9,342
|
9,353
|
Notre
Dame Debt (in default)
|
8,019
|
7,821
|
BDPL
Loan Agreement (in default)
|
5,694
|
5,534
|
March
Ingleside Note (in default)
|
1,308
|
1,283
|
March
Carroll Note (in default)
|
1,330
|
1,147
|
June
LEH Note (in default)
|
340
|
611
|
Capital
Leases
|
31
|
41
|
|
$49,096
|
$48,383
|
|
|
|
Less:
Current portion of long-term debt, net
|
(42,104)
|
(41,904)
|
Less:
Unamortized debt issue costs
|
(1,974)
|
(2,006)
|
Less: Interest
payable and interest payable, related party
|
(5,018)
|
(4,473)
|
|
|
|
|
$-
|
$-
|
|
|
|
Principal
payments on long-term debt totaled $0.3 million in the Current
Quarter compared to $0.2 million in the Prior Quarter. As of the
date of this Quarterly Report, LE and LRM were current on monthly
payments under the First Term Loan Due 2034 and Second Term Loan
Due 2034. There have been no payments under the Notre Dame Debt to
date and no payments to Jonathan Carroll under the March Carroll
Note since May 2017.
As
described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, Veritex notified
obligors that the Final Arbitration Award constitutes an event of
default under the First Term Loan Due 2034 and Second Term Loan Due
2034. In addition to existing events of default related to the
Final Arbitration Award, March 31, 2019, LE and LRM were in
violation of the debt service coverage ratio, the current ratio,
and debt to net worth ratio financial covenants related to the
secured loan agreements. LE also failed to replenish a payment
reserve account as required. The occurrence of events of default
under the secured loan agreements permits Veritex to declare the
amounts owed under the secured loan agreements immediately due and
payable, exercise its rights with respect to collateral securing
obligors’ obligations under the loan agreements, and/or
exercise any other rights and remedies available.
Veritex has not accelerated or called due the secured loan
agreements considering the Settlement Agreement, which Veritex must
ultimately approve. Instead, Veritex has expressly reserved
all its rights, privileges and remedies related to events of
default under the secured loan agreements and informed obligors
that it would consider a final confirmation of the Final
Arbitration Award to be a material event of default under the loan
agreements. Veritex has been working
with LE and LRM and continues to be aware and party to all
discussions and arrangements with GEL surrounding the
Settlement. Veritex must ultimately approve the Settlement.
However, if Veritex does not approve
the Settlement or exercises its rights and remedies under the
secured loan agreements or the Settlement Agreement with GEL is
terminated and GEL seeks to confirm and enforce the Final
Arbitration Award, our business, financial condition, and results
of operations will be materially adversely affected, and Blue
Dolphin would likely be required to seek protection under
bankruptcy laws.
See
“Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note (1)
Organization – Going Concern” and “–
Operating Risks”, as well as “Note (11) Long-Term Debt,
Net” for additional disclosures related to long-term debt
financial covenant violations and events of default.
See
“Contractual Obligations – Related-Party” within
the Liquidity and Capital Resources section for additional
disclosures with respect to related-party
indebtedness.
47
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None.
Critical Accounting Policies
Long-Lived Assets.
See “Part I, Item 1. Financial
Statements – Note (3) Significant Accounting Policies –
Property and Equipment”.
Revenue Recognition. See
“Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note (3)
Significant Accounting Policies – Revenue
Recognition”.
Inventory. See “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements
– Note (3) Significant Accounting Policies –
Inventory”.
Asset Retirement Obligations. See “Part I, Item 1.
Financial Statements – Note (3) Significant Accounting
Policies – Asset Retirement Obligations” and
“— Note (12) Asset Retirement
Obligations”.
Income Taxes. See “Part I, Item 1. Financial
Statements – Note (3) Significant Accounting Policies –
Income Taxes” and “– Note (15) Income
Taxes”.
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance
See “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note (3)
Significant Accounting Policies – New Pronouncements
Adopted”.
New Pronouncements Issued, Not Yet Effective
See “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note (3)
Significant Accounting Policies – New Pronouncements Issued,
Note Yet Effective”.
Not
applicable.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision of, and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer and principal financial officer), we conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly
Report. Based on our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, are recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
48
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018. In connection with
the adoption on January 1, 2019 of new accounting guidance for
leases, we implemented new processes and internal controls related
to our leases.
Except as described above, there has been no change in our internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three
months ended March 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting. (See “Part I, Item 4. Controls and
Procedures – Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures” of this Quarterly Report for a discussion related
to controls and procedures.)
Final Arbitration Award
See
“Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note (1)
Organization – Going Concern – Final Arbitration Award
and Settlement Agreement” of this Quarterly Report for
disclosures related to the Final Arbitration Award to GEL and the
Settlement Agreement between the Lazarus Parties and
GEL.
Other Legal Matters
We are
involved in lawsuits, claims, and proceedings incidental to the
conduct of our business, including mechanic’s liens,
contract-related disputes, administrative proceedings, and
financial assurance (bonding) requirements with regulatory bodies.
Management is in discussion with all concerned parties and does not
believe that such matters will have a material adverse effect on
our financial position, earnings, or cash flows. However, there can be no assurance that such
discussions will result in a manageable outcome or that we will be
able to meet financial assurance (bonding) requirements. If Veritex
does not approve the Settlement or exercises its rights and
remedies under the secured loan agreements or if the Settlement
Agreement with GEL is terminated and GEL seeks to confirm and
enforce the Final Arbitration Award, our business, financial
condition, and results of operations will be materially adversely
affected, and Blue Dolphin and its affiliates would likely be
required to seek protection under bankruptcy
laws.
In
addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly
Report, careful consideration should be given to the risk factors
discussed under “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” and
elsewhere in our Annual Report. These risks and uncertainties could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations. Our operations could also be affected by
additional factors that are not presently known to us or by factors
that we currently consider immaterial to our business. There have
been no material changes in our assessment of our risk factors from
those set forth in our Annual Report.
None.
See
“Part I, Item. 1. Financial Statements – Note (11)
Long-Term Debt, Net” for disclosures related to defaults on
our debt.
49
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Not
applicable.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits Index
No.
|
Description
|
Fourth
Amendment to the Settlement Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2019,
by and among Lazarus Energy, LLC, Blue Dolphin Energy Company,
Lazarus Energy Holdings, LLC, Nixon Product Storage, LLC, Carroll
& Company Financial Holdings, L.P., Jonathan Carroll and GEL
Tex Marketing, LLC, incorporated by reference to the Current Report
on Form 8-K filed by the Company on March 21, 2019 (file no.
000-15905).
|
|
31.1*
|
Jonathan
P. Carroll Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.1*
|
Jonathan
P. Carroll Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
101.INS*
|
XBRL
Instance Document.
|
101.SCH*
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Schema Document.
|
101.CAL*
|
XBRL
Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
101.LAB*
|
XBRL
Label Linkbase Document.
|
101.PRE*
|
XBRL
Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
101.DEF*
|
XBRL
Definition Linkbase Document.
|
*
Filed
herewith.
50
BLUE
DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
FORM
10-Q 3/31/19
|
Pursuant to the
requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Quarterly Report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
BLUE DOLPHIN ENERGY COMPANY
|
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 16,
2019
|
|
By:
|
/s/
JONATHAN P. CARROLL
|
|
|
|
Jonathan
P. Carroll
Chief
Executive Officer, President,
Assistant
Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51