Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. - Annual Report: 2019 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2019

For the Transition Period from __________ to _______

Commission File Number: 000-52942

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

Issuer’s telephone number: (800) 844-5576

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 par value

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicated by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

If an emerging growth company, indicate by checkmark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes [  ] No [X]

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2019 was approximately $672,000.

As of August 13, 2020 the registrant had 793,357,428 outstanding shares of common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.

FORM 10-K

For the year ended December 31, 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements about our business, financial condition and prospects that reflect our management’s assumptions and beliefs based on information currently available. We can give no assurance that the expectations indicated by such forward-looking statements will be realized. If any of our assumptions should prove incorrect, or if any of the risks and uncertainties underlying such expectations should materialize, our actual results may differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements.

The key factors that are not within our control and that may have a direct bearing on operating results include, but are not limited to, acceptance of our services, our ability to expand our customer base, managements’ ability to raise capital in the future, the retention of key employees and changes in the regulation of our industry.

There may be other risks and circumstances that management may be unable to predict. When used in this report, words such as, “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify and qualify forward-looking statements, although there may be certain forward-looking statements not accompanied by such expressions.

PART I

We were originally incorporated in Nevada on September 11, 2006, under the name The Engraving Masters, Inc. (the “Company”).

On May 2, 2014, we changed our name to Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.

On May 6, 2014, our directors approved a 14-for-1 forward stock split. In connection with the stock split, our authorized capital increased to 1,400,000,000 shares of common stock. All references to share and per share amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been retroactively restated to reflect the forward stock split.

We provide armed protection and transportation, banking, compliance and training services for businesses engaged in the legal cannabis industry. During the year ended December 31, 2019 approximately 74% of our revenue was derived from transportation and banking services. The remaining 26% of our revenue was derived from protection services (24%), and compliance (2%).

In March 2015, our wholly-owned Nevada subsidiary, BLPG, Inc., was granted licenses to provide our services in Nevada.

Our base of operations is in the Denver, Colorado metropolitan area. Our corporate headquarters are located at 5765 Logan Street, Denver, CO 80216.

Principal Services

Cultivation facilities are the producers of legal cannabis that eventually make its way to consumers. Growers’ operations typically span a large geographic footprint, making them susceptible to theft, as are shipments from the growers to testing laboratories or to retail dispensaries. Additionally, due to current federal marijuana legislation and banking environment, growers are finding it increasingly difficult to secure their cash, purchase equipment and obtain financing for expansion.

Dispensaries are the retail face of the legal cannabis industry. All legal sales of cannabis products are transacted through dispensaries that are state-licensed. To maintain their licenses, dispensaries must comply with a variety of state-mandated reporting requirements, including reporting every gram of cannabis passing in and out of the store. Dispensaries also face financing and banking challenges similar to those that growers encounter.

We do not grow, test or sell cannabis.

Our services cover the following:

Protection and Transportation

Fundamental to the legal cannabis industry is the protection of product and cash throughout the distribution channel. Growers ship product from their cultivation facilities to independent laboratories where it is tested for compliance with state-mandated parameters. From the labs, the product is then delivered to the retail dispensaries, where it is sold to the public.

Due to the current banking and regulatory environments, payments between each step in the distribution network are made in cash: from the customer back to the grower. Therefore, these businesses are forced into having to transport bags of money between growers and dispensaries and their own vaults or storage facilities.

The risk of theft of cash and product is present at every stage, even when they are not in transit. Accordingly, all cannabis businesses require security measures to prevent theft, mitigate risk to employees and maintain regulatory compliance.

We began our security and protection operations in Colorado in February 2014. In less than six months, we have become the largest legal cannabis protection services company in the state. We offer a fully integrated approach to managing the movement of cannabis and cash from growers through dispensaries via armed and armored transport, money processing, vaulting and related credit. Money processing services generally include counting, sorting and wrapping currency.

We currently supply guards, protection and armed and armored transportation to approximately 60% of all the licensees in Colorado. We are focused on encompassing all compliance needs on behalf of our clients, as mandated by the State and Federal authorities for the protection, transport and sale of cannabis.

We also offer security monitoring, asset vaulting, and VIP and dignitary protection.

Banking

The banking system in the U.S. is, in most states, federally regulated. Possession or distribution of marijuana violates federal law, and banks that provide support for those activities face the risk of prosecution and assorted sanctions. Currently, almost all payments for the sales of cannabis are made in cash, due the inability of sellers to obtain merchant processing accounts. As a result, processing money from marijuana sales puts federally insured banks at risk of drug racketeering charges, so they’ve refused to open accounts for marijuana-related businesses. 


Marijuana businesses that can’t use banks may have too much cash they can’t safely put away, leaving them vulnerable to criminals. Jurisdictions that allow cannabis sales want a channel to receive taxes.

In February 2014, The Obama administration gave banks a road map for conducting transactions with cannabis sellers operating within state regulations, so these companies can stash away savings, make payroll and pay taxes like a traditional place of business. The move was designed to let financial institutions serve such businesses while ensuring that they know their customers’ legitimacy and remain obligated to report possible criminal activity. However, there remains nothing expressly protecting banks that work with state-legal, state-licensed marijuana businesses from prosecution. We are unaware of any bank, in any state, allowing bank accounts for cannabis-related businesses for fear of prosecution and losing their FDIC status and insurance.

We have created a means for the banks to validate compliance with the Federal Mandate. Currently only a security company could match the compliance requirements as only we can vertically integrate the source of funds through the Federally required 12 steps, summarized as from grow, to sale, (to those of approved age or license), to purchaser, to funds received, to where the funds were held, to vault, to third party validation, to tax, to profits, to access to the banking system etc. We are uniquely positioned, through a number of partnership and cooperation agreements, to provide banking solutions to our clients.

Compliance

Laws concerning business procedures and practices are changing across the nation. It’s hard to keep up with all the changes, and business owners have to balance their day-to-day operations with remaining compliant with and responsive to regulatory agencies. Blue Line Protection Group provides daily on-site compliance verification to ensure that local business owners are operating lawful and inspection-ready establishments. Our security experts, trained in crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) techniques, can provide crucial advice about enhancing the interior and exterior security of your establishment.

We communicate regularly with local and national government representatives to ensure that we remain the top-tier security and protection group in the nation. Retail establishments aren’t the only ones who have to remain compliant with the pertinent laws - we do, as well.

We have agreed a joint venture with one of the largest PEO HR companies in America out of Phoenix Arizona. They will handle all payments to employees of the companies we serve. They will also handle background checks on all employees. We will receive a percentage of every contract.

With the addition of our compliance module clients can be confident they will not lose their license for some small or large error by their staff that might put their cannabis license in jeopardy. Their license being, in most instances, their most valuable asset. We are relieving them of several burdens they are ill suited to comply with. (Most licensees were formally acting outside the law prior to the recent legislation and have little to no compliance experience).

Training

Many of our security personnel have established military or police backgrounds. We ensure our employees are prepared to offer clients, their staff and customers a safe and secure environment. All members of the Company’s armored transportation team and security operators are required to undertake our mandatory, rigorous 40-hour introductory compliance and training curriculum created and supervised by both:

In addition to internal training, we also offer other businesses, houses of worship and the general public a wide variety of safety, security and personal defense courses and firearms training.

Growth Strategy

The development of the legal markets for cannabis is a function of state legislation. As a result, while specific markets may not be currently available, we actively monitor the progress of legislation and know with some degree of certainty when new geographic markets will be coming on line. This allows us to target our limited sales and marketing resources to those new markets. In this way, we believe the current legislative environment works in our favor - if the whole country were currently a potential market our limited resources would result in an inability to effectively cover all potential market territories. With limited markets open we can better cover those available territories.

Marketing

Virtually all of our sales, to date, have been generated without using paid media. Our security personnel conduct the majority of our marketing and advertising efforts. Nearly all of our guards are former police officers or military personnel and are the face of our company. They interact with business owners, employees and customers on a daily basis. As such, they generate significant brand awareness and word-of-mouth goodwill. Complementary to this, our management actively engages with business owners directly to generate awareness of our company and the services we provide, as well as to identify the potential for sales or referrals.

In addition to a direct sales approach and word-of-mouth advertising, we have been featured in news articles and video documentaries by outlets such as the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Fortune and CNBC, which have served to increase brand awareness nationwide. We have also attended a variety of industry trade shows and have been granted membership in industry groups.

Industry Background

The total market for marijuana, is estimated to exceed the economic value of corn and wheat combined. Marijuana is widely considered the largest cash crop in the United states. Businesses have been positioning themselves for years, each trying to establish a leadership position in the legal cannabis industry, projected to reach as high as $37 billion in retail sales by 2024. Colorado, Arizona and Nevada combined are projected to have $3.45 billion in legal sales during the 2020 fiscal year.

Competition

We believe the primary factors in attracting and retaining customers are expertise, service quality, and price. Our competitive advantages include:

Our cost structure is generally competitive, although certain competitors may have lower costs due to a variety of factors, including lower wages, lower initial and ongoing training requirements, less costly employee benefits, or less stringent security and service standards. We anticipate facing competitive pricing pressure in many markets; however, we plan to resist competing on price alone. We believe our high levels of service and security, as well as value-added solutions, differentiates us from competitors.

We compete with companies of all sizes in a variety of geographies that offer solutions that compete with single elements of our platform, such as regulatory compliance, armed security, armored transportation services and money processing. The security services industry is a large and competitive market. More specifically, however, the market for security and storage solutions as it pertains to medical marijuana companies is a nascent market, resulting in a highly fragmented and fractured marketplace. Some of the companies we compete with are much larger than us, and such companies have significantly greater resources than us. None of the large security companies, such as Brinks, Argyle, Tyco or Torment, are currently competing in this market segment, although there can be no guarantee this trend will continue.

Significantly all of our current and potential traditional competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer or user bases, greater brand recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. Our competitors may be able to secure experienced employees, accommodate customers more efficiently and adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we can. Many of these current and potential competitors can devote substantially more resources to advertising, marketing and attracting experienced talent than we can. In addition, larger, more well-established and financed entities may acquire, invest in or form joint ventures with our competitors.

Government Regulation

In most jurisdictions we are required to obtain government approval to provide security and/or investigative services. We expect to make every effort to comply with all existing and pending regulatory conditions and licensing requirements in each state we currently or potentially operate in.

Continued development of the marijuana industry is dependent upon continued legislative authorization of marijuana at the state level. Any number of factors could slow or halt progress in this area. Further, progress, while encouraging, is not assured. While there may be ample public support for legislative action, numerous factors impact the legislative process. Any one of these factors could slow or halt use of marijuana, which would negatively impact our proposed business.

Marijuana is a Schedule-I controlled substance and is illegal under federal law. Even in those states in which the use of marijuana has been legalized, its use remains a violation of federal laws. There are currently 29 states and the District of Columbia allowing its citizens to use Medical Marijuana. Additionally, 8 states and Washington D.C. have legalized cannabis for adult recreational use. The state laws are in conflict with the federal Controlled Substances Act, which makes marijuana use and possession illegal on a national level. The former Obama administration has effectively stated that it is not an efficient use of resources to direct law federal law enforcement agencies to prosecute those lawfully abiding by state-designated laws allowing the use and distribution of medical marijuana. However, the new Trump administration could change this policy and decide to enforce the federal laws strongly. Active enforcement of the current federal regulatory position on cannabis may thus indirectly and adversely affect our revenues and profits. Any such change in the federal government’s enforcement of current federal laws could cause significant financial damage to us. While we do not intend to harvest, distribute or sell cannabis, we may be irreparably harmed by a change in enforcement by the Federal or state governments.

Intellectual Property

We are developing proprietary streamlined government-certified software capable of tracking all movements of cannabis products through to cash to taxes paid to deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank. The technology behind our software is being engineered and developed by subcontractors, and we consider it proprietary and confidential, and protected under trade secret laws. We have not sought to patent our aspect of this technology; however, we have not yet determined if we will seek to patent any aspect of the software in the future.

We plan to protect our proprietary and confidential information through a series of non-compete and non-disclosure contracts with our employees, contractors and other interested parties. The law of protection of confidential information effectively allows a perpetual monopoly in secret information, and it does not expire as would a patent. The lack of formal protection, however, means that a third party is not prevented from independently duplicating and using the secret information once it is discovered.

Number of total employees and number of full-time employees

As of August 12, 2020, we had approximately 31 full and part-time employees, some of which are former military or law enforcement professionals.

Properties

We lease our offices in Denver, Colorado pursuant to a lease which expires on October 26, 2026. We have the option to extend the term of the lease for two additional five-year periods. The lease requires rental payments of approximately $10,612.00 per month which increases 2% annually.

We lease our offices in Phoenix, Arizona pursuant to a lease which expires on May 31^st, 2023. We have the option to extend the term of the lease for two additional five-year periods. The lease requires rental payments of approximately $4,113.56 per month which increases approximately 3% annually.

On January 22, 2019 the Company leased office space at 7490 Bridgewater Road, Huber Heights, Ohio The lease is for an initial term of 63 months, with rental payments of $3,200 per month.

We have a limited operating history and may not succeed.

We have a limited operating history and may not succeed. We are subject to all risks inherent in a developing business enterprise. Our likelihood of continued success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications, and delays frequently encountered in connection with manufacturing specialty products and the competitive and regulatory environment in which we operate. You should consider, among other factors, our prospects for success in light of the risks and uncertainties encountered by companies that, like us, are in their early stages. For example, unanticipated expenses, problems, and technical difficulties may occur and they may result in material delays in the operation of our business, in particular with respect to our new products. We may not successfully address these risks and uncertainties or successfully implement our operating strategies. If we fail to do so, it could materially harm our business to the point of having to cease operations and could impair the value of our common stock to the point investors may lose their entire investment.

We may not be able to attain profitability without additional funding, which may be unavailable.

We have limited capital resources. To date, we have not earned a profit or generated cash from our operations. Unless we begin to generate sufficient revenues from our proposed business to finance operations as a going concern, we may experience liquidity and solvency problems. Such liquidity and solvency problems may force us to go out of business if additional financing is not available. We have no intention of liquidating. In the event our cash resources are insufficient to continue operations, we intend to raise additional capital through offerings and sales of equity or debt securities. In the event we are unable to raise sufficient funds, we will be forced to go out of business and will be forced to liquidate. A possibility of such outcome presents a risk of complete loss of investment in our common stock.

The occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic may negatively affect our operations depending on the severity and longevity of the pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic is currently impacting countries, communities, supply chains and markets as well as the global financial markets. A pandemic typically results in social distancing, travel bans and quarantine, and this may limit access to our facilities, customers, management, support staff and professional advisors. These factors, in turn, may not only impact our operations, financial condition and demand for services but our overall ability to react timely to mitigate the impact of this event. Also, it may hamper our efforts to comply with our filing obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, our business, customers, and shareholders may experience a significant negative impact.

None.

See Item 1. Business.

On March 2, 2018, Steve Neumeyer filed a complaint against the Company in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada, alleging, among other matters, breach of contract, and seeking damages of an unspecified amount for allegedly providing services to the Company. The Company believes Mr. Neumeyer’s complaint is without merit. An agreement was reached in July 2019, and the claim was settled for $1,000.

On September 5, 2018, Andy Sims, a former employee, filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court, District of Colorado alleging unpaid wages, and seeking compensation for unpaid wages, liquidated damages, penalties, and attorneys’ fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act. An agreement was reached in February 2019, and the claim was settled for $15,000.

None.

PART II

The high and low closing prices of our common stock for the periods indicated are set forth below. These closing prices do not reflect retail mark-up, markdown or commissions.

As of August 13, 2020 we had 793,357,428 outstanding shares of common stock held by approximately 216 shareholders of record. Our transfer agent is Pacific Stock Transfer Company, 4045 South Spencer Street, Suite 403, Las Vegas, NV 89119, phone (702) 361-3033.

Not applicable.

Certain statements set forth below under this caption constitute forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” preceding Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional factors relating to such statements.

You should read the following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Report.

Results of Operations

Material changes in line items in our Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the same period last year, are discussed below:

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Our material sources and <uses> of cash during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were:

As of December 31, 2019 the Company has shut-down is Service-Guards segment.

General

Our material capital commitments over the next five years are as follows:

On October 27, 2016 the Company sold its building located at 5765 Logan Street, Denver, Colorado to an unrelated third party for $1,400,000. The Company repaid the mortgage on the building in the amount of $677,681. After the sale, the Company leased the building from the purchaser of the property. The lease is for an initial term of ten years, with the Company having the option to extend the term of the lease for two additional five year periods. The lease requires rental payments of approximately $10,612 per month which increases 2% annually.

See Notes 6 and 7 to the financial statements included as part of this report for information concerning our notes payable.

Other than as disclosed above, we do not anticipate any material capital requirements for the twelve months ending December 31, 2019.

Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this report, we do not know of any trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that will result in, or that are reasonable likely to result in, our liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way.

Other than as disclosed in this Item 7, we do not know of any significant changes in our expected sources and uses of cash.

We do not have any commitments or arrangements from any person to provide us with any equity capital. During the next 12 months, we anticipate that we will incur approximately $1,500,000 of general and administrative expenses in order to execute our current business plan. We also plan to incur sales, marketing, research and development expenses during the next 12 months. We must obtain additional financing to continue our operations. We may not be able to obtain additional funding on terms that are favorable to us or at all. We may not be able to obtain sufficient funding to continue our operations, or if we do receive funding, to generate adequate revenues in the future or to operate profitably in the future. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Management considers the following policies critical because they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and operating results, and they require management to make judgments and estimates about inherently uncertain matters.

Accounts receivable. Accounts receivable are stated at the amount we expect to collect from outstanding balances and do not bear interest. We provide for probable uncollectible amounts through an allowance for doubtful accounts, if an allowance is deemed necessary. The allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable; however, changes in circumstances relating to accounts receivable may result in a requirement for additional allowances in the future. On a periodic basis, management evaluates its accounts receivable and determines the requirement for an allowance for doubtful accounts based on its assessment of the current and collectible status of individual accounts with past due balances over 90 days. Account balances are charged against the allowance after all collection efforts have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.

Revenue recognition. As all of our Revenue is generated from services offerings, Revenue recognition is the same for each of our revenue streams. We recognize revenue when all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; (2) the service has been provided to the customer; (3) the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable; and (4) the collection of its fees is reasonably assured.

Stock-based compensation. The Company records stock based compensation in accordance with the guidance in ASC Topic 505 and 718, which requires the Company to recognize expenses related to the fair value of our employee stock option awards. This eliminates accounting for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value and requires instead that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. We recognize the cost of all share-based awards on a graded vesting basis over the vesting period of the award.

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from other than employees in accordance with FASB ASC 718-10 and the conclusions reached by the FASB ASC 505-50. Costs are measured at the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or the estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measureable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earliest of a performance commitment or completion of performance by the provider of goods or services as defined by FASB ASC 505-50.

Significant Accounting Policies

See Note 2 to the financial statements included as part of this report for a description of our significant accounting policies.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, the FASB or other standards setting bodies issue new accounting pronouncements. Updates to the FASB ASCs are communicated through issuance of an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”). Unless otherwise discussed, we believe that the impact of recently issued guidance, whether adopted or to be adopted in the future, is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

To understand the impact of recently issued guidance, whether adopted or to be adopted, please review the information provided in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements included as part of this Report.

Not applicable.

See the Financial Statements attached to this report

None

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. As a result of this evaluation, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2019 for the same reasons that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective:

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

As of December 31, 2019, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013) and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective due to the following material weakness identified:

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only the management’s report in this annual report.

Implemented or Planned Remedial Actions in response to the Material Weaknesses

We will continue to strive to correct the above noted weakness in internal control once we have adequate funds to do so. We believe appointing a director who qualifies as a financial expert will improve the overall performance of our control over our financial reporting.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2019 that materially affect, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The Company’s management, including the chief executive officer and principal financial officer, do not expect that its disclosure controls or internal controls will prevent all errors or all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.

None.

PART III

Our directors are elected by the stockholders to a term of one year and serve until their successors are elected and qualified. The officers are appointed by our Board of Directors to a term of one year and serve until his/her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he/she is removed from office.

The names and ages of our directors and executive officers and their positions are as follows:

Evan DeVoe was appointed as the Company’s Chief Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer and a Director on March 13, 2020. Mr. DeVoe, prior to March 13, 2020, was the Company’s Chief Operating Officer (August 2019 – March 2020) and the Company’s Vice President of Systems Development (January 2018 to August 2019). Prior to that time Mr. DeVoe was the controller (May 2016 - June 2017) and an accounting associate (October 2015 - May 2016) for the Weisser Companies, a firm engaged in commercial real estate and retail operations. Between March 2014 and October 2015 Mr. DeVoe was a client service associate for Millennium Portfolio Advisors.

Ricky G. Bennett was appointed an officer on March 24, 2014. Mr. Bennett was, between October 2013 and March 2014, an independent consultant to Convercent, Inc., a Denver, Colorado-based corporation which develops and markets computer software which firms use to comply with human resource regulations and conduct employee training. Between 2011 and October 2013 Mr. Bennett was Vice President of Professional Services and Director of Training for Convercent. Between 2008 and 2010 Mr. Bennett was an Interstate Compact and Youth Offender Officer for the Colorado Department of Corrections. In this position, Mr. Bennett used a variety of strategies and services to instill pro-social behaviors in offenders transitioning into the community. Mr. Bennett joined the Aurora, Colorado Police Department in 1980, served as the Aurora Chief of Police between 2002 and 2005, and retired as a commander in 2007. Mr. Bennet left the company in September of 2019 for personal reasons.

Christopher Galvin has been a director since January 30, 2018. Mr. Galvin founded and served as Chief Executive Officer and chairman of several public and private companies. He began his career in investment banking – focusing on mergers and acquisitions and structured finance – and has deep experience in corporate finance, hedge fund and private equity strategies. Mr. Galvin is the founder and chief executive officer of Hypur Inc., an Arizona-based company providing banking and payment technology designed specifically to enable financial institutions to safely and profitably serve cash-intensive and high-risk businesses. Mr. Galvin is also co-founder and president of Hypur Ventures, a venture capital fund dedicated to investing in businesses that operate in the cannabis industry.

Daniel Allen was elected an officer and director July 28, 2015. Mr. Allen resigned as an Officer on March 13, 2020. Mr. Allen provided us with consulting services in the areas of banking and financing for four months in 2014. Between April 2013 and March 2014 Mr. Allen served as the Regional Vice President of Sunflower Bank in Longmont, Colorado. Between June 2001 and April 2013, Mr. Allen was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Mile High Banks in Longmont, Colorado. Mr. Allen holds a Bachelor of Science in Management and Finance from the University of Utah. On March 13^th, 2020, Daniel Allen resigned from his position as CEO. Dan remains an active member of our Board.

Doyle Knudson was elected as one of our directors on July 28, 2015. Between 1975 and 2002 Mr. Knudson held various positions with C.H. Robinson Company, a large multimodal transportation service provider. In 1975 he started in the corporate marketing center responsible for information services for carrier capacity, carrier insurance verification and research at the ICC in Washington, DC for common carrier authority. In 1976 Mr. Knudson was transferred to Ross Truck, a division of C.H. Robinson – customer support for publication logistics for Target stores and RR Donnelly. In 1978 Mr. Knudson was transferred to Lake Wales, FL as a Transportation Salesman responsible for customer development with agri business customers. In 1982 Mr. Knudson was promoted and transferred as Transportation Manager when he opened a new branch office in Houston, TX. In 1987 Mr. Knudson was promoted to General Manager at a new branch office in El Paso, TX, developing and providing logistics services for Coca Cola; Phelps Dodge, Dell Computers and Phillips Electronics.

Audit Committee, Independent Directors and Financial Expert

We do not have an Audit Committee; our board of directors currently acts as our Audit Committee. Doyle Knudson is an independent director, as that term is defined in the rules of the NYSE American. None of our directors is considered a “Financial Expert”.

Code of Ethics

We have not adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions since one person, Dan Allen, serves in all the above capacities.

Overview of Compensation Program

Our Board of Directors acts as our Compensation Committee and has responsibility for establishing, implementing and continually monitoring adherence to our compensation philosophy. The Board of Directors ensures that the total compensation paid to our executives is fair, reasonable and competitive.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The Board of Directors believes that the most effective executive compensation program is one that is designed to reward the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals by the Company and that aligns executives’ interests with those of the stockholders by rewarding performance above established goals, with the ultimate objective of improving stockholder value. As a result of the size of the Company and only having two executive officers, the Board evaluates both performance and compensation on an informal basis. Upon hiring additional executives, the Board intends to evaluate the necessity of establishing a Compensation Committee to evaluate both performance and compensation to ensure that the Company maintains its ability to attract and retain superior employees in key positions and that compensation provided to key employees remains competitive relative to the compensation paid to similarly-situated executives of peer companies. To that end, the Board believes executive compensation packages provided by the Company to its executives, including the named executive officers, should include both cash and stock-based compensation that reward performance as measured against established goals.

Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions

Our Directors make all compensation decisions for, and approve recommendations regarding, equity awards to our Directors and employees.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 the cash compensation paid by the Company, as well as certain other compensation paid with respect to those years to our officers:

Equity Compensation Plan

Up to 15,000,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under our 2014-2015 Stock Incentive Plan (“the Plan”) that was adopted on November 12, 2014.

The purposes of the Plan are to enhance our ability to attract and retain the services of qualified employees, officers and directors, contractors and other service providers upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts the successful conduct and development of our business largely depends, and to provide additional incentives to such persons or entities to devote their utmost effort and skill to our advancement and betterment by providing them an opportunity to participate in the ownership of our common stock and thereby have an interest in our success.

Shares that are eligible for grant under the Plan include Incentive Stock Options, Non-Qualified Stock Options and Restricted Stock. “Incentive Options” are any options designated and qualified as an “incentive stock option” as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. “Non-Qualified Options” are any options that are not an Incentive Option. To the extent that any option designated as an Incentive Option fails in whole or in part to qualify as an Incentive Option, it will constitute a Non-Qualified Option. “Restricted Stock” are shares of common stock issued pursuant to any restrictions and conditions as established by the Plan.

Only our employees (including our officers and Directors if they are employees) are eligible to receive Incentive Options under the Plan.

Our employees, officers and Directors (whether or not employed by us), and service providers are eligible to receive Non-Qualified Options or acquire Restricted Stock under the Plan.

The following tables list the options granted, cancelled and exercised during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 to our officers and directors pursuant to the Plan:

Options Granted

Options Cancelled

Options Exercised

The following shows certain information as of December 31, 2019 concerning the stock options and stock bonuses granted pursuant to the Plan. Each option represents the right to purchase one share of common stock.

Directors’ Compensation

Our directors are not entitled to receive compensation for services rendered to us, or for each meeting attended except for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. We have no formal or informal arrangements or agreements to compensate our director for services she provides as a director of our company.

The following table shows the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock as of August 13, 2020 by (i) each person whom the Company knows beneficially owns more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock; (ii) each of the Company’s officers and directors; and (iii) all the officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, each owner has sole voting and investment powers over his shares of common stock.

Note: As used in this table, “beneficial ownership” means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or share investment power with respect to a security (i.e., the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of a security).

In November 2015, the Company entered into an arrangement with a related party, whereby the Company borrowed $25,000 in Convertible Notes. The Convertible Note bears interest at a rate of 5% per annum and payable quarterly in arrears and matures twelve months from the date of issuance, and is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a per share conversion price equal to $0.025. The note was due on November 4, 2016. In December 2015 the lender loaned the Company an additional $20,000 with same terms except that it is payable upon demand. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company owed a total of $45,000 and $45,000, respectively. The holder of the note has agreed to extend the default date of the note to September 30, 2018. As of December 31, 2019 the note is currently in default.

In July 2015, the Company entered into an arrangement with a related party, whereby the Company could borrow up to $500,000 in Convertible Notes. The Convertible Note bears interest at a rate of 5% per annum and payable quarterly in arrears and matures twelve months from the date of issuance, and is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a per share conversion price equal to $0.025. Upon the occurrence and during the continuation of an event of default, the holder may require the Company to redeem all or any portion of this Note in cash at a price equal to 150% of the principal amount. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company borrowed an additional $430,000. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company owed a total of $500,000 and $1,103,000, respectively. Since the debt holder has not elect the right to require the Company to redeem the note at a price equal to 150% of the principal amount, the terms stated prior to maturity are still in effect. The holder has waived the default term and the note is not considered to be in default as of December 31, 2019

During October 2015, the Company borrowed $30,000 from an entity controlled by an officer of the Company. The loan is due and payable on demand and is non-interest bearing. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repaid $121,500 and borrowed an additional $184,500 from the same related party. As of December 31, 2019 the principal balance outstanding is $30,000.

On July 7, 2016, the Company borrowed $73,000 from a related party. The loan was due and payable on July 7, 2017 and bore interest at 5% per annum. The principal balance owed on this loan at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $73,000 and $73,000, respectively. The holder of the note has agreed to extend the default date of the note to September 30, 2018. As of and December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 the note is currently in default.

On August 8, 2016, the Company entered into a promissory note with Hypur Inc., a Nevada Corporation which is a related party pursuant to which the Company to borrow $52,000. If an Event of Default remains uncured after 30 days Holder has the option to convert the outstanding principal balance and any accrued but unpaid interest, into unrestricted $0.001 par value common stock of the Borrower The loan was due and payable on August 10, 2017 and bore interest at 18% per annum. The principal balance owed on this loan at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $52,000 and $52,000, respectively. The Note is currently in default at bears a default rate of interest of 24% per annum as part of the default terms of this note. On October 1, 2017, it was determined this note had derivative. Upon default, if the default has not been remedied within 30 days, the redemption price would be 150% of the principal amount. The notes are in default as of December 31, 2019, but the holder has agreed to waive the 150% redemption price default term.

On September 20, 2016, the Company borrowed $47,500 from Hypur Inc., which is a related party. The loan is due and payable on December 20, 2016 and bears interest at 18% per annum. If an Event of Default remains uncured after 30 days Holder has the option to convert the outstanding principal balance and any accrued but unpaid interest, into unrestricted $0.001 par value common stock of the Borrower. The principal balance owed on this loan at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $47,500 and $47,500, respectively. The loan is currently past due and in default. The Note is currently in default at bears a default rate of interest of 24% per annum as part of the default terms of this note. On October 1, 2017 it was determined this note had derivative. Upon default, and if the default has not been remedied within 30 days, the redemption price would be 150% of the principal amount. The notes are in default as of December 31, 2019, but the holder has agreed to waive the 150% redemption price default term.

On September 20, 2016, the Company borrowed $47,500 from Hypur Inc., which is a related party. The loan is due and payable on December 20, 2016 and bears interest at 18% per annum. If an Event of Default remains uncured after 30 days Holder has the option to convert the outstanding principal balance and any accrued but unpaid interest, into unrestricted $0.001 par value common stock of the Borrower. The principal balance owed on this loan at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $47,500 and $47,500, respectively. The loan is currently past due and in default. The Note is currently in default at bears a default rate of interest of 24% per annum as part of the default terms of this note. On October 1, 2017 it was determined this note had derivative. Upon default, and if the default has not been remedied within 30 days, the redemption price would be 150% of the principal amount. The notes are in default as of December 31, 2019, but the holder has agreed to waive the 150% redemption price default term.

On October 29, 2018, the Company borrowed $100,000 from Hypur Inc., which is a related party. The loan is due and payable on January 28, 2019 and bears interest at 18% per annum. If an Event of Default remains uncured after 30 days Holder has the option to convert the outstanding principal balance and any accrued but unpaid interest, into unrestricted $0.001 par value common stock of the Borrower. Upon default the note bears a default rate of interest of 24% per annum as part of the default terms of this note. The principal balance owed on this loan at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $100,000 and $100,000, respectively. The note was discounted for a derivative (see note 8 for details) and the discount of $89,350 is being amortized over the life of the note using the effective interest method resulting in $89,350 of interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2019 the note is currently in default.

On November 21, 2018, the Company borrowed $70,000 from Hypur Inc., which is a related party. The loan is due and payable on February 19, 2019 and bears interest at 18% per annum. If an Event of Default remains uncured after 30 days Holder has the option to convert the outstanding principal balance and any accrued but unpaid interest, into unrestricted $0.001 par value common stock of the Borrower. Upon default the note bears a default rate of interest of 24% per annum as part of the default terms of this note. The principal balance owed on this loan at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $70,000 and $70,000, respectively. The note was discounted for a derivative (see note 8 for details) and the discount of $55,830 is being amortized over the life of the note using the effective interest method resulting in $55,830 of interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2019 the note is currently in default.

On November 26, 2018, the Company borrowed $75,000 from Hypur Inc., which is a related party. The loan is due and payable on February 24, 2019 and bears interest at 18% per annum. If an Event of Default remains uncured after 30 days Holder has the option to convert the outstanding principal balance and any accrued but unpaid interest, into unrestricted $0.001 par value common stock of the Borrower. Upon default the note bears a default rate of interest of 24% per annum as part of the default terms of this note. The principal balance owed on this loan at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $75,000 and $75.000, respectively. The note was discounted for a derivative (see note 8 for details) and the discount of $58,913 is being amortized over the life of the note using the effective interest method resulting in $58,913 of interest expense for the year ended nine December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2019 the Note is currently in default.

On May 10, 2019, the Company borrowed $75,000 from Hypur Inc., which is a related party. The loan is due and payable on May 12, 2020 and bears interest at 18% per annum. If an Event of Default remains uncured after 30 days Holder has the option to convert the outstanding principal balance and any accrued but unpaid interest, into unrestricted $0.001 par value common stock of the Borrower. Upon default the note bears a default rate of interest of 24% per annum as part of the default terms of this note. The principal balance owed on this loan at December 31, 2019 was $75,000. 

On September 3, 2019, the Company borrowed $21,000 from Hypur Inc., which is a related party. The loan is due and payable on December 3, 2019 and bears interest at 18% per annum. If an Event of Default remains uncured after 30 days Holder has the option to convert the outstanding principal balance and any accrued but unpaid interest, into unrestricted $0.001 par value common stock of the Borrower. Upon default the note bears a default rate of interest of 24% per annum as part of the default terms of this note. The principal balance owed on this loan at December 31, 2019 was $21,000.

May 26, 2017, the Company borrowed $100,000 from CGDK, a related party. The loan is due 360 days from May 26, 2017 and bears interest at 5% per annum. The loan is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $.025 per share. The loan will automatically convert into shares of the Company’s common stock if the price of the Company’s common stock is over $.25 per share during any ten-day period. The principal balance owed on this loan at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $100,000 and $100,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 the note is currently in default.

On July 13, 2017, the Company borrowed $150,000 from CGDK, a related party. The loan is due 360 days from July 13, 2017, and bears interest at 5% per annum. The loan is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $.05 per share. The loan will automatically convert into shares of the Company’s common stock if the price of the Company’s common stock is over $.25 per share during any ten-day period. The principal balance owed on this loan at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $150,000. The conversion feature has been waved through October 15, 2019. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the note is currently in default.

On April 13, 2018, the Company borrowed $130,000 from CGDK, a related party. The loan is due 360 days from April 13, 2018, bears interest at 12% per annum. The loan is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $.05 per share. The loan will automatically convert into shares of the Company’s common stock if the price of the Company’s common stock is over $.25 per share during any ten-day period. The Company recorded a discount of $101,272 due to derivative. The Company amortized $72,694 in debt discounts during the year ended December 31, 2018. The Company amortized $27,560 in debt discounts during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The principal balance owed on this loan at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is $130,000 and $130,000, respectively. On November 5, 2019 CGDK waived the default provision until April 13, 2020.

On June 14, 2018, the Company issued a $30,217 promissory note to CGDK, a related party, for previous expenses paid on behalf of the Company. The loan is due 360 days from June 18, 2018, bears interest at 12% per annum. The loan is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $.05 per share. The loan will automatically convert into shares of the Company’s common stock if the price of the Company’s common stock is over $.25 per share during any ten-day period. The Company recorded a debt discount of $10,292 due to derivative. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company amortized $5,639 of the discount. The Company amortized $3,697 in debt discounts during the nine months ended December 31, 2019. The principal balance owed on this loan at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is $30,217 and $30,217, respectively. On November 5, 2019 CGDK waived the default provision until June 14, 2020.

On July 2, 2018, the Company borrowed $150,000 from CGDK, a related party. The loan is due July 2, 2019 and bears interest at 12% per annum. The loan is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $.05 per share. The loan will automatically convert into shares of the Company’s common stock if the price of the Company’s common stock is over $.10 per share during any ten-day period or the trading volume of the Company’s common stock during these ten trading days was at least 2,500,000 shares. The Company recorded a debt discount of $19,779 due to derivative. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company amortized $9,862 of the discount. The Company amortized $7,390 in debt discounts during the year ended December 31, 2019. The principal balance owed on this loan at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is $150,000 and $150,000, respectively. On November 5, 2019 CGDK waived the default provision until July 2, 2020.

On August 6, 2018, the Company borrowed $150,000 from CGDK, a related party. The loan is due July 2, 2019 and bears interest at 12% per annum. The loan is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $.05 per share. The loan will automatically convert into shares of the Company’s common stock if the price of the Company’s common stock is over $.10 per share during any ten-day period or the trading volume of the Company’s common stock during these ten trading days was at least 2,500,000 shares. The Company recorded a debt discount of $20,095 due to derivative. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company amortized $8,093 of the discount. The Company amortized $7,793 in debt discounts during the year ended December 31, 2019. The principal balance owed on this loan at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is $150,000 and $150,000, respectively. On November 5, 2019 CGDK waived the default provision until August 6, 2020.

The following table sets forth fees billed to us by our independent auditors for the years ended 2019 and 2018 for (i) services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial statements, (ii) services rendered that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements that are not reported as Audit Fees, and (iii) services rendered in connection with tax preparation, compliance, advice and assistance.

Audit fees and audit related fees represent amounts billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our interim financial statements. Before our independent accountants were engaged by to render these services, their engagement was approved by our Directors.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of

Blue Line Production Group, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Blue Line Production Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatements. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Blue Line Production Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2018, and the results of its consolidated operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP

www.malonebailey.com

Houston, Texas

April 16, 2019

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The financial statements of Blue Line Protection Group, Inc., as of December 31, 2018, were audit by other auditors whose report dated April 16, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continues as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered net losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are discussed in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

M&K CPAS, PLLC.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.

Houston, TX

August 28, 2020

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 AND 2018

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC .

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – History and organization of the company

The Company was originally organized on September 11, 2006 (Date of Inception) under the laws of the State of Nevada, as The Engraving Masters, Inc. The Company was authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of its common stock and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, each with a par value of $0.001 per share.

On March 14, 2014, the Company acquired Blue Line Protection Group, Inc., a Colorado corporation formed in February 2014 (“Blue Line Colorado”), as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Blue Line Colorado provides protection, compliance, and financial services to the lawful cannabis industry.

On May 2, 2014, the Company changed its name from The Engraving Masters, Inc. to Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. (“BLPG”)

On May 6, 2014, the Company effected a forward stock split and a pro-rata increase in its authorized common stock on a basis of 14-to-1, whereby each shareholder received 14 newly issued shares of common stock for each 1 share held. Additionally, the authorized capital of the Company concurrently increased to 1,400,000,000 shares of common stock. All references to share and per share amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto have been retroactively restated to reflect the forward stock split.

The Company provides armed protection, logistics, and compliance services for businesses engaged in the legal cannabis industry. The Company offers asset logistic services, such as armored transportation service; security services, including shipment protection, money escorts, security monitoring, asset vaulting, VIP and dignitary protection, financial services, such as handling transportation and storage of currency; training; and compliance services.

Note 2 – Accounting policies and procedures

Results of operations for the interim periods are not indicative of annual results.

Principles of consolidation

For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. (formerly The Engraving Masters, Inc.), Blue Line Advisory Services, Inc. (a Nevada corporation; “BLAS”), Blue Line Capital, Inc. (a Colorado corporation; “Blue Line Capital”), Blue Line Protection Group (California), Inc. (a California corporation; “Blue Line California”), Blue Line Colorado, Blue Line Protection Group Illinois, Inc. (an Illinois corporation; “Blue Line Illinois”), BLPG, Inc. (a Nevada corporation; “Blue Line Nevada”), Blue Line Protection Group (Washington), Inc. (a Washington corporation; “Blue Line Washington”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. BLPG and its subsidiaries are collectively referred herein to as the “Company.”

Basis of presentation

The financial statements present the balance sheets, statements of operations, stockholder’s equity (deficit) and cash flows of the Company. The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.

The Company has adopted December 31 as its fiscal year end.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company maintains a cash balance in a non-interest-bearing account that currently does not exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable are stated at the amount the Company expects to collect from outstanding balances and do not bear interest. The Company provides for probable uncollectible amounts through an allowance for doubtful accounts, if an allowance is deemed necessary. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable; however, changes in circumstances relating to accounts receivable may result in a requirement for additional allowances in the future. On a periodic basis, management evaluates its accounts receivable and determines the requirement for an allowance for doubtful accounts based on its assessment of the current and collectible status of individual accounts with past due balances over 90 days. Account balances are charged against the allowance after all collection efforts have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.

Allowance for uncollectible accounts

The Company estimates losses on receivables based on known troubled accounts, if any, and historical experience of losses incurred. There was no allowance for doubtful customer receivables at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment is recorded at cost and capitalized from the initial date of service. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized and minor replacements, maintenance, and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When property and equipment is retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations for the respective period. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. The Company uses other depreciation methods (generally accelerated) for tax purposes where appropriate. The estimated useful lives for significant property and equipment categories are as follows:

The Company reviews the carrying value of property and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the property is used, and the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition and other economic factors. Based on this assessment there was no impairment as December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Depreciation expense for the December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, is $130,831 and $82,663, respectively.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The Company accounts for its long-lived assets in accordance with ASC Topic 360-10-05, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” ASC Topic 360-10-05 requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the historical cost or carrying value of an asset may no longer be appropriate. The Company assesses recoverability of the carrying value of an asset by estimating the future net cash flows expected to result from the asset, including eventual disposition. If the future net cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss is recorded equal to the difference between the asset’s carrying value and its fair value or disposable value. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company determined that none of its long-term assets were impaired.

Concentration of business and credit risk

The Company has no significant off-balance sheet risk such as foreign exchange contracts, option contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements. The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentration of credit risks consist primarily of cash. The Company maintains its cash in bank accounts, which may at times, exceed federally insured limits.

The Company had one major customer which generated approximately 12% of total revenue in the year ended December 31, 2019.

The Company had two major customers which generated approximately 34% (17%, and 17%) of total revenue in the year ended December 31, 2018.

Related party transactions

FASB ASC 850, “Related Party Disclosures” requires companies to include in their financial statements disclosures of material related party transactions. The Company discloses all material related party transactions. Related parties are defined to include any principal owner, director or executive officer of the Company and any immediate family members of a principal owner, director or executive officer.

Fair value of financial instruments

The carrying amounts reflected in the balance sheets for cash, accounts payable and related party payables approximate the respective fair values due to the short maturities of these items. The Company does not hold any investments that are available-for-sale.

As required by the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC, fair value is measured based on a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

The following table presents the derivative financial instruments, the Company’s only financial liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis, and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

December 31, 2019