Bluegreen Vacations Holding Corp - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010
OR
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission File Number
001-09071
001-09071
BFC Financial Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Florida | 59-2022148 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or | (IRS Employer Identification Number) | |
organization) | ||
2100 West Cypress Creek Road | ||
Fort Lauderdale, Florida | 33309 | |
(Address of Principal executive office) | (Zip Code) |
(954) 940-4900
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller
reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock as of November
10, 2010 is as follows:
Class A Common Stock of $.01 par value, 68,521,497 shares outstanding.
Class B Common Stock of $.01 par value, 6,859,751 shares outstanding.
Class B Common Stock of $.01 par value, 6,859,751 shares outstanding.
BFC Financial Corporation
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition Unaudited
(In thousands, except share data)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 385,874 | 316,080 | |||||
Interest bearing deposits at other financial institutions |
47,990 | | ||||||
Restricted cash |
62,748 | 24,020 | ||||||
Securities available for sale, at fair value |
490,634 | 346,375 | ||||||
Derivatives, at fair value |
95 | | ||||||
Investment securities at cost (fair value: $1,981 in 2010 and $9,654 in 2009) |
1,981 | 9,654 | ||||||
Current income tax receivable |
9,399 | 64,006 | ||||||
Tax certificates, net of allowance of $8,452 in 2010 and $6,781 in 2009 |
104,681 | 110,991 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost which approximates fair value |
45,259 | 48,751 | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
2,839 | 4,547 | ||||||
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of
$185,947 in 2010 and $187,218 in 2009 |
3,226,715 | 3,678,894 | ||||||
Notes receivable including gross securitized notes,
net of allowance of $80,754 in 2010 and $3,986 in 2009 |
598,693 | 277,274 | ||||||
Retained interest in notes receivable sold |
| 26,340 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
23,290 | 32,279 | ||||||
Real estate inventory |
460,712 | 494,291 | ||||||
Real estate owned and other repossessed assets |
67,783 | 46,477 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
12,776 | 15,272 | ||||||
Properties and equipment, net |
236,636 | 289,209 | ||||||
Goodwill |
12,241 | 12,241 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
78,016 | 81,686 | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
37,209 | | ||||||
Assets held for sale from discontinued operations |
| 71,900 | ||||||
Other assets |
96,619 | 96,750 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,002,190 | 6,047,037 | |||||
Assets of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) included in
total assets above |
||||||||
Restricted cash |
$ | 39,388 | ||||||
Securitized notes receivable, gross |
551,899 | |||||||
Total assets of consolidated VIEs |
$ | 591,287 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Interest bearing deposits |
$ | 2,688,407 | 3,133,360 | |||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
805,501 | 815,458 | ||||||
Deposits held for sale |
339,360 | | ||||||
Total deposits |
3,833,268 | 3,948,818 | ||||||
Advances from FHLB |
180,000 | 282,012 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
19,138 | 24,468 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings |
1,810 | 2,803 | ||||||
Receivable-backed notes payable |
590,052 | 237,416 | ||||||
Notes and mortgage notes payable and other borrowings |
357,123 | 395,361 | ||||||
Junior subordinated debentures |
457,699 | 447,211 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
32,514 | 31,204 | ||||||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
100 | | ||||||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale from discontinued operations |
| 76,351 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
229,218 | 186,453 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
5,700,922 | 5,632,097 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Preferred stock of $.01 par value; authorized - 10,000,000 shares: |
||||||||
Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock $.01 par value;
authorized 15,000 shares; issued and outstanding 15,000 shares
with a redemption value of $1,000 per share |
11,029 | 11,029 | ||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Class A common stock of $.01 par value, authorized 150,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 68,521,497 in 2010 and 2009 |
685 | 685 | ||||||
Class B common stock of $.01 par value, authorized 20,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 6,859,751 in 2010 and 6,854,251 in 2009 |
69 | 69 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
230,589 | 227,934 | ||||||
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings |
(50,729 | ) | 16,608 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
3,639 | (237 | ) | |||||
Total BFC Financial Corporation (BFC) shareholders equity |
184,253 | 245,059 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
105,986 | 158,852 | ||||||
Total equity |
290,239 | 403,911 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 6,002,190 | 6,047,037 | |||||
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs included in total liabilities above |
||||||||
Receivable-backed notes payable |
$ | 468,325 | ||||||
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs |
$ | 468,325 | ||||||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
For the Three Months Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Real Estate and Other: |
||||||||||||||||
Sales of real estate, net of estimated uncollectibles |
$ | 57,919 | 130 | 130,089 | 3,324 | |||||||||||
Other resorts and communities operations revenue |
17,603 | | 50,546 | | ||||||||||||
Other revenues |
15,942 | 845 | 40,021 | 2,606 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
20,869 | | 81,051 | | ||||||||||||
112,333 | 975 | 301,707 | 5,930 | |||||||||||||
Financial Services: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
44,706 | 54,561 | 136,441 | 174,948 | ||||||||||||
Service charges on deposits |
15,214 | 19,767 | 45,764 | 57,799 | ||||||||||||
Other service charges and fees |
7,495 | 7,355 | 22,612 | 22,439 | ||||||||||||
Securities activities, net |
(552 | ) | 4,774 | 2,898 | 9,906 | |||||||||||
Other non-interest income |
4,708 | 3,158 | 9,725 | 9,087 | ||||||||||||
71,571 | 89,615 | 217,440 | 274,179 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues |
183,904 | 90,590 | 519,147 | 280,109 | ||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Real Estate and Other: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of real estate |
21,840 | 31,664 | 44,380 | 33,658 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales of other resorts and communities operations |
13,401 | | 38,456 | | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
24,847 | 3,128 | 64,847 | 8,606 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
67,790 | 10,996 | 184,394 | 33,225 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
| 2,001 | | 2,001 | ||||||||||||
127,878 | 47,789 | 332,077 | 77,490 | |||||||||||||
Financial Services: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
9,126 | 15,805 | 30,921 | 61,378 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
24,410 | 63,586 | 103,718 | 151,357 | ||||||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
23,549 | 24,876 | 74,082 | 79,617 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
13,263 | 14,553 | 40,590 | 44,306 | ||||||||||||
Advertising and promotion |
2,026 | 1,549 | 6,209 | 6,360 | ||||||||||||
Check losses |
763 | 1,146 | 1,716 | 2,981 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees |
6,209 | 3,470 | 13,920 | 9,491 | ||||||||||||
Supplies and postage |
983 | 1,035 | 2,902 | 3,038 | ||||||||||||
Telecommunication |
702 | 353 | 1,898 | 1,637 | ||||||||||||
Cost associated with debt redemption |
| 5,431 | 60 | 7,463 | ||||||||||||
Provision for (recovery from) tax certificates |
885 | (198 | ) | 3,752 | 2,702 | |||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
| | | 8,541 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of assets held for sale |
4,469 | | 4,469 | | ||||||||||||
Impairment of real estate held for development and sale |
| 1,131 | 1,511 | 1,165 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of real estate owned |
500 | 137 | 1,864 | 760 | ||||||||||||
Lease termination costs, net |
1,093 | 383 | 1,308 | 1,684 | ||||||||||||
Employee termination costs |
2,103 | 78 | 2,103 | 2,024 | ||||||||||||
FDIC special assessment |
| | | 2,428 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses |
6,617 | 8,004 | 23,049 | 22,900 | ||||||||||||
96,698 | 141,339 | 314,072 | 409,832 | |||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
224,576 | 189,128 | 646,149 | 487,322 | ||||||||||||
(continued)
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
For the Three Months Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Loss) gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridges subsidiary |
| | (1,135 | ) | 40,369 | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates |
317 | 12,213 | 786 | 29,463 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates |
| (10,780 | ) | | (31,181 | ) | ||||||||||
Impairment of investments |
| | (2,396 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income |
498 | 766 | 2,135 | 2,525 | ||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
(39,857 | ) | (96,339 | ) | (125,216 | ) | (168,433 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
(996 | ) | 3 | (5,195 | ) | 3 | ||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(38,861 | ) | (96,342 | ) | (120,021 | ) | (168,436 | ) | ||||||||
(Loss) income from
discontinued operations |
| (1,367 | ) | 2,465 | 2,169 | |||||||||||
Net loss |
(38,861 | ) | (97,709 | ) | (117,556 | ) | (166,267 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(11,239 | ) | (43,697 | ) | (52,919 | ) | (88,943 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
(27,622 | ) | (54,012 | ) | (64,637 | ) | (77,324 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | (563 | ) | (563 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (27,810 | ) | (54,200 | ) | (65,200 | ) | (77,887 | ) | |||||||
Basic and Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Common Share
Attributable to BFC (Note 22): |
||||||||||||||||
Basic (Loss) Earnings Per Common Share |
||||||||||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.37 | ) | (1.08 | ) | (0.90 | ) | (1.68 | ) | |||||||
(Loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations |
| (0.01 | ) | 0.03 | 0.01 | |||||||||||
Net loss per common share |
$ | (0.37 | ) | (1.09 | ) | (0.87 | ) | (1.67 | ) | |||||||
Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Common Share |
||||||||||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.37 | ) | (1.08 | ) | (0.90 | ) | (1.68 | ) | |||||||
(Loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations |
| (0.01 | ) | 0.03 | 0.01 | |||||||||||
Net loss per common share |
$ | (0.37 | ) | (1.09 | ) | (0.87 | ) | (1.67 | ) | |||||||
Basic weighted average number of
common shares outstanding |
75,381 | 49,509 | 75,379 | 46,599 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average number of common
and common equivalent shares outstanding |
75,381 | 49,509 | 75,379 | 46,599 | ||||||||||||
Amounts attributable to BFC common shareholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
$ | (27,810 | ) | (53,337 | ) | (67,665 | ) | (78,125 | ) | |||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
| (863 | ) | 2,465 | 238 | |||||||||||
Net loss attributable to BFC common shareholders |
$ | (27,810 | ) | (54,200 | ) | (65,200 | ) | (77,887 | ) | |||||||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
Unaudited
(In thousands)
For the Three Months Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (38,861 | ) | (97,709 | ) | (117,556 | ) | (166,267 | ) | |||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on securities available for sale |
219 | 8,232 | 5,294 | 21,953 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized loss associated with investment
in unconsolidated affiliates |
| (986 | ) | | (381 | ) | ||||||||||
Pro-rata share of cumulative impact of accounting changes
recognized by Bluegreen Corporation on
retained interests in notes receivable sold |
| | | (1,251 | ) | |||||||||||
Realized (gains) loss reclassified into net loss |
249 | (4,773 | ) | (2,890 | ) | (7,510 | ) | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
468 | 2,473 | 2,404 | 12,811 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
(38,393 | ) | (95,236 | ) | (115,152 | ) | (153,456 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling
interests |
(11,560 | ) | (46,447 | ) | (53,466 | ) | (87,051 | ) | ||||||||
Total comprehensive loss attributable to BFC |
$ | (26,833 | ) | (48,789 | ) | (61,686 | ) | (66,405 | ) | |||||||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Unaudited
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
(In thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Accumulated | Compre- | Total | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares of Common | Class A | Class B | Additional | Deficit) | hensive | BFC | controlling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Outstanding | Common | Common | Paid-in | Retained | Income | Shareholders | Interest in | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Class B | Stock | Stock | Capital | Earnings | (Loss) | Equity | Subsidiaries | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
68,521 | 6,854 | $ | 685 | $ | 69 | $ | 227,934 | $ | 16,608 | $ | (237 | ) | $ | 245,059 | $ | 158,852 | $ | 403,911 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle (Note 2) |
| | | | | (2,137 | ) | 925 | (1,212 | ) | (811 | ) | (2,023 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance beginning of year, as adjusted |
$ | 685 | $ | 69 | $ | 227,934 | $ | 14,471 | $ | 688 | $ | 243,847 | $ | 158,041 | $ | 401,888 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (64,637 | ) | | (64,637 | ) | (52,919 | ) | (117,556 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
| | | | | | 2,951 | 2,951 | (547 | ) | 2,404 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Class B Common Stock
from exercise of options |
| 6 | | | 2 | | | 2 | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net effect of subsidiaries capital
transactions attributable to BFC |
| | | | 1,772 | | | 1,772 | | 1,772 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest net effect of
subsidiaries capital transactions |
| | | | | | | | 1,411 | 1,411 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends on 5% Preferred Stock |
| | | | | (563 | ) | | (563 | ) | | (563 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation
related to stock options |
| | | | 881 | | | 881 | | 881 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2010 |
68,521 | 6,860 | $ | 685 | $ | 69 | $ | 230,589 | $ | (50,729 | ) | $ | 3,639 | $ | 184,253 | $ | 105,986 | $ | 290,239 | |||||||||||||||||||||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Unaudited
(In thousands)
For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 246,196 | 25,754 | |||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of interest-bearing deposits in other financial
institutions |
(47,990 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from redemption and maturity of investment securities
and tax certificates |
107,238 | 170,087 | ||||||
Purchase of investment securities and tax certificates |
(97,285 | ) | (123,250 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
92,109 | 318,779 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale |
96,420 | 116,743 | ||||||
Purchase of securities available for sale |
(322,872 | ) | (75,500 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash |
(2,970 | ) | 12,971 | |||||
Cash paid in settlement of Woodbridge subsidiarys bankruptcy |
| (12,430 | ) | |||||
Purchases of FHLB stock |
| (2,295 | ) | |||||
Redemption of FHLB stock |
3,492 | 8,151 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
| (973 | ) | |||||
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates |
85 | 564 | ||||||
Net decrease in loans receivable |
283,226 | 305,467 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of loans receivable |
29,421 | 5,427 | ||||||
Improvements to real estate owned |
(945 | ) | (1,018 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of real estate owned |
18,899 | 3,715 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of assets |
75,306 | | ||||||
Disposals of office properties and equipment |
507 | | ||||||
Purchases of office property and equipment, net |
(5,455 | ) | (3,016 | ) | ||||
Cash from consolidation of Pizza Fusion |
| 3,000 | ||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
229,186 | 726,422 | ||||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in deposits |
(115,550 | ) | 39,683 | |||||
Prepayment of FHLB advances |
(2,068 | ) | (1,159,463 | ) | ||||
Net (repayments) proceeds from FHLB advances |
(100,000 | ) | 527,000 | |||||
Decrease in short-term borrowings |
(6,323 | ) | (250,488 | ) | ||||
Prepayment of notes and bonds payable |
(661 | ) | | |||||
Repayment of notes, mortgage notes and bonds payable |
(256,944 | ) | (2,612 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from notes, mortgage notes and bonds payable |
84,509 | 132 | ||||||
Payments for debt issuance costs |
(3,198 | ) | (1,167 | ) | ||||
Preferred stock dividends paid |
(563 | ) | (563 | ) | ||||
Purchase and retirement of Woodbridge common stock |
| (13 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from the issuance of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A common stock
from non-BFC shareholders |
4,601 | 45,377 | ||||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp common stock dividends paid to non-BFC shareholders |
| (198 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from the exercise of BFC stock options |
2 | | ||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock in Pizza Fusion |
1,279 | | ||||||
Non-controlling interest distributions |
(5,770 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(400,686 | ) | (802,312 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
74,696 | (50,136 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
316,080 | 278,937 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents held for sale |
(4,902 | ) | | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 385,874 | 228,801 | |||||
(continued)
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Unaudited
(In thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Unaudited
(In thousands)
For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||
Interest paid on borrowings and deposits |
$ | 74,836 | 78,149 | |||||
Income taxes refunded, net of payments |
59,793 | | ||||||
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Loans and tax certificates transferred to real estate owned |
40,942 | 21,268 | ||||||
Long-lived assets held-for-use transferred to assets held for sale |
1,919 | | ||||||
Long-lived assets held-for-sale transferred to assets held for use |
1,239 | | ||||||
Transfers to assets held-for-sale: |
||||||||
Cash |
4,902 | |||||||
Office properties and equipment |
32,307 | |||||||
Securities purchased pending settlement |
5,239 | | ||||||
Net increase in BFC accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of taxes |
2,951 | 10,919 | ||||||
Net increase in BFC shareholders equity from
the effect of subsidiaries capital transactions, net of taxes |
1,772 | 7,818 | ||||||
Net decrease in equity resulting from cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle (See Note 2) |
(2,023 | ) | | |||||
Net increase in shareholders equity resulting from the cumulative impact of
accounting changes recognized by Bluegreen on retained interests in
notes receivable sold |
| 485 | ||||||
BFC and Woodbridge Merger related transactions: |
||||||||
Increase in BFCs Class A Common Stock |
| 448 | ||||||
Increase in additional paid-in-capital |
| 99,135 | ||||||
Decrease in BFCs non-controlling interest in Woodbridge |
| (99,583 | ) |
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
9
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Presentation of Interim Financial Statements
BFC Financial Corporation (BFC or, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise
requires, we, us, our or the Company) is a diversified holding company whose principal
holdings include a controlling interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries,
including BankAtlantic (BankAtlantic Bancorp), a controlling interest in Bluegreen Corporation
and its subsidiaries (Bluegreen), and a non-controlling interest in Benihana, Inc. (Benihana).
BFC also holds interests in other investments and subsidiaries, including Core Communities, LLC and
its subsidiaries (Core or Core Communities). As a result of its position as the controlling
shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC is a unitary savings bank holding company regulated by
the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).
As previously disclosed, on September 21, 2009, BFC consummated its merger with Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation pursuant to which Woodbridge Holdings Corporation merged with and into
Woodbridge Holdings, LLC (Woodbridge), BFCs wholly-owned subsidiary which continued as the
surviving company of the merger and the successor entity to Woodbridge Holdings Corporation. As a
result of the merger, Woodbridge Holdings Corporations separate corporate existence ceased and its
Class A Common Stock is no longer publicly traded. Woodbridge is the parent company of Core.
On November 16, 2009, an additional 7.4 million shares of the common stock of Bluegreen were
purchased, increasing our ownership interest to approximately 16.9 million shares, or approximately
52%, of Bluegreens outstanding common stock. Accordingly, we are deemed to have a controlling
interest in Bluegreen and, under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), Bluegreens
results since November 16, 2009, the date of the share purchase, are consolidated in BFCs
financial statements. Prior to November 16, 2009, the investment in Bluegreens shares represented
approximately 29% of Bluegreens common stock and Bluegreen was accounted for using the equity
method.
GAAP requires that BFC consolidate the financial results of the entities in which it has
controlling interest. As a consequence, the assets and liabilities of all such entities are
presented on a consolidated basis in BFCs financial statements. However, except as otherwise
noted, the debts and obligations of the consolidated entities, including BankAtlantic Bancorp,
Bluegreen, Woodbridge and Core are not direct obligations of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC.
Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC absent a dividend or distribution
from those entities. The recognition by BFC of income from controlled entities is determined based
on the total percent of economic ownership in those entities. At September 30, 2010, we owned
approximately 52% of Bluegreens common stock and had an approximately 45% ownership interest and 71%
voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with GAAP for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In managements
opinion, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments,
which include normal recurring adjustments, except the adjustments
described below, as are necessary for a fair statement of the Companys
consolidated financial condition at September 30, 2010, the consolidated results of operations,
comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the changes in
consolidated equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and consolidated cash flows for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Operating results for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
year ending December 31, 2010. The unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. All
significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
During
the third quarter of 2010, the Company recorded adjustments to sales of real estate,
net of estimated uncollectibles, and interest income on notes receivable to correct amounts
previously recorded in the first and second quarters of 2010 in connection with the consolidation
of the financial statements of Bluegreen.
The impact of
these adjustments was an increase in sales of real estate, net of estimated
uncollectibles of approximately $6.0 million and a decrease in interest income on notes receivable
of $5.8 million, resulting in a net increase in notes receivable of approximately $200,000.
Additionally, during
the third quarter of 2010, the Company recorded an adjustment to interest
expense to properly recognize interest expense using the default rates applicable on the defaulted
debt at Woodbridge and Core in accordance with their respective loan agreements for the fourth
quarter of 2009 and the first and second quarters of 2010. This adjustment resulted in a $3.1
million increase in both interest expense and accrued interest liability.
The impact of these
adjustments was not material to the Companys consolidated financial
statements as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 or the Companys
consolidated financial statements for the applicable prior periods.
Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current periods
presentation.
As a result of the Woodbridge merger on September 21, 2009 and the Bluegreen share acquisition
on November 16, 2009, the Company reorganized its reportable segments to better align its segments
with the current operations of its businesses. The Companys business activities currently consist
of (i) Real Estate and Other Activities and (ii) Financial Services Activities. The Company
currently reports the results of operations of these
10
Table of Contents
business activities through six reportable segments: BFC Activities, Real Estate Operations,
Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen Communities, BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company. As
a result of this reorganization, our BFC Activities segment now includes activities formerly
reported in the Woodbridge Other Operations segment and our Real Estate Operations segment is
comprised of what was previously identified as the Land Division.
In December 2009, Core Communities reinitiated efforts to sell two of its commercial leasing
projects (the Projects) and began soliciting bids from several potential buyers to purchase
assets associated with the Projects. Due to this decision, the assets associated with the
Projects were reclassified as assets held for sale and the liabilities related to these assets were
reclassified as liabilities related to assets held for sale in the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition. Additionally, the results of operations for the Projects are included in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations in discontinued operations for the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2009 and the nine month period ended September 30, 2010. On June
10, 2010, Core sold the Projects for approximately $75.4 million. As a result of the sale, a $2.6
million gain on sale of discontinued operations was realized in the second quarter of 2010. See
Note 5 for further information.
On February 28, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp completed the sale to Stifel Financial Corp
(Stifel) of Ryan Beck Holdings, Inc. (Ryan Beck), a subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp engaged
in retail and institutional brokerage and investment banking. Under the terms of the Ryan Beck
sales agreement, BankAtlantic Bancorp received additional consideration based on Ryan Beck revenues
over the two year period following the closing of the sale. BankAtlantic Bancorp also had certain
indemnification obligations under the terms of the agreement. The $4.2 million of earn-out
consideration is included in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations as discontinued
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. See Note 5 for further information.
2. Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
On January 1, 2010, BFC, Bluegreen and BankAtlantic Bancorp adopted an amendment to the
accounting guidance for transfers of financial assets and an amendment to the accounting guidance
associated with the consolidation of VIEs. As a result of the adoption of these accounting
standards, Bluegreen consolidated seven existing special purpose finance entities (QSPEs)
associated with prior securitization transactions which previously qualified for off-balance sheet
sales treatment, and BankAtlantic Bancorp consolidated its joint venture that conducts a factoring
business. Accordingly, Bluegreens special purpose finance entities and BankAtlantic Bancorps
factoring joint venture are now consolidated in BFCs financial statements. The consolidation of
Bluegreens special purpose finance entities resulted in a one-time non-cash after-tax reduction to
retained earnings of $2.1 million. No charges were recorded to retained earnings in connection with
the consolidation of BankAtlantic Bancorps factoring joint venture.
The consolidation of Bluegreens special purpose finance entities also resulted in the
following impacts to BFCs Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at January 1, 2010:
(1) assets increased by $413.8 million, primarily representing the consolidation of notes
receivable, net of allowance, partially offset by the elimination of retained interests;
(2) liabilities increased by $416.1 million, primarily representing the consolidation of
non-recourse debt obligations to securitization investors, partially offset by the elimination of
certain deferred tax liabilities; and (3) total equity decreased by approximately $2.3 million,
including a decrease to noncontrolling interest of approximately $1.1 million.
11
Table of Contents
The impact of the adoption of the change in accounting principle on the related assets,
related liabilities, noncontrolling interests and total equity are as follows (in thousands):
Consolidation | ||||||||||||||||||||
BankAtlantic | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | Bluegreens | Bancorps | January 1, | |||||||||||||||||
2009 | QSPEs | Joint Venture (1) | Total | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
$ | 24,020 | 36,518 | | 36,518 | 60,538 | ||||||||||||||
Loans receivable |
3,678,894 | | 3,214 | 3,214 | 3,682,108 | |||||||||||||||
Notes receivable |
277,274 | 377,265 | | 377,265 | 654,539 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate inventory |
494,291 | 16,403 | | 16,403 | 510,694 | |||||||||||||||
Retained interest in notes receivable
sold |
26,340 | (26,340 | ) | | (26,340 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates |
15,272 | | (3,256 | ) | (3,256 | ) | 12,016 | |||||||||||||
Other assets |
96,750 | 9,970 | 367 | 10,337 | 107,087 | |||||||||||||||
Change in related assets |
$ | 4,612,841 | 413,816 | 325 | 414,141 | 5,026,982 | ||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
$ | 186,453 | 3,544 | 18 | 3,562 | 190,015 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
31,204 | 1,233 | | 1,233 | 32,437 | |||||||||||||||
Receivable -backed notes payable |
237,416 | 411,369 | | 411,369 | 648,785 | |||||||||||||||
Change in related liabilities |
$ | 455,073 | 416,146 | 18 | 416,164 | 871,237 | ||||||||||||||
Total BFCs shareholders equity |
$ | 245,059 | (1,212 | ) | | (1,212 | ) | 243,847 | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
158,852 | (1,118 | ) | 307 | (811 | ) | 158,041 | |||||||||||||
Total equity |
$ | 403,911 | (2,330 | ) | 307 | (2,023 | ) | 401,888 | ||||||||||||
(1) | As a result of the adoption of the accounting guidance associated with the consolidation of VIEs, we consolidated BankAtlantic Bancorps factoring joint venture, BankAtlantic Business Capital, LLC (BBC). Prior to January 1, 2010, the investment in BBC was accounted for using the equity method of accounting. |
3. Liquidity
BFC
Except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen,
Woodbridge and Core are not direct obligations of BFC and generally are non-recourse to BFC.
Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC, absent a dividend or distribution
from those entities. BFCs principal sources of liquidity are its available cash, short-term
investments, dividends or distributions from subsidiaries and dividends from Benihana. As
discussed further in this report, recent tax law changes have resulted in the receipt of
significant tax refunds.
We may use our available funds to make additional investments in the companies within our
consolidated group, invest in equity securities and other investments, fund operations or
repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program. The current program
authorizes management, at its discretion, to repurchase shares from time to time subject to market
conditions and other factors. No shares were repurchased during the nine months ended September 30,
2010 or the year ended December 31, 2009. As discussed further in this report, during June and July
2010, BFC acquired an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock
for an aggregate purchase price of $15 million as a result of its exercise of subscription rights
distributed in BankAtlantic Bancorps rights offering to its shareholders.
Since March 2009, BFC has not received cash dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp and does not
expect to receive cash dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp for the foreseeable future because
BankAtlantic Bancorp is currently prohibited from paying dividends on its common stock.
Furthermore, certain of Bluegreens credit facilities contain terms which may limit the payment of
cash dividends.
BFC, on a parent company only basis, has committed that it will not, without the prior
written non-objection of the OTS, (i) incur, issue, renew or roll over any current lines of credit,
guarantee the debt of any other entity or otherwise incur any additional debt or (ii) declare or
make any dividends or other capital distributions.
We believe that our current financial condition and credit relationships, together with
anticipated cash flows from operating activities and other sources of funds, including tax refunds
and proceeds from the disposition of certain properties or investments, will provide for
anticipated near-term liquidity needs. With respect to long-term liquidity requirements, BFC may
also seek to raise funds through the issuance of long-term secured or unsecured indebtedness,
equity and/or debt securities or through the sale of assets; however, there is no assurance that
any of these alternatives will be available to BFC on attractive terms, or at all.
12
Table of Contents
Woodbridge
The development activities at Carolina Oak, which is within Tradition Hilton Head, were
suspended in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of, among other things, an overall softening of
demand for new homes and a decline in the overall economy. In 2009, the housing industry continued
to face significant challenges and Woodbridge made the decision to cease all activities at Carolina
Oak. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we reviewed the inventory of real estate at Carolina Oak for
impairment and as a result, recorded a $16.7 million impairment charge to adjust the carrying
amount of Carolina Oaks inventory to its estimated fair value of $10.8 million. Woodbridge is the
obligor under a $37.2 million loan that is collateralized by the Carolina Oak property. During
2009, the lender declared the loan to be in default and filed an action for foreclosure. While
there may have been an issue with respect to compliance with certain covenants in the loan
agreements, we do not believe that an event of default had occurred as was alleged. Woodbridge
continues to seek a satisfactory conclusion with regard to the debt; however, the outcome of these
efforts and the litigation is uncertain.
As previously disclosed, under Florida law, holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock who
did not vote to approve the merger between Woodbridge and BFC and properly asserted and exercised
their appraisal rights with respect to their shares (Dissenting Holders) are entitled to receive
a cash payment in an amount equal to the fair value of their shares as determined in accordance
with the provisions of Florida law in lieu of the shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock that they
would otherwise have been entitled to receive. Dissenting Holders, who collectively held
approximately 4.2 million shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, have rejected Woodbridges
offer of $1.10 per share and requested payment for their shares based on their respective fair
value estimates of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. Woodbridge is currently a party to legal
proceedings relating to the Dissenting Holders appraisal process. In December 2009, a $4.6 million
liability was recorded with a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in capital, which is
reflected in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition representing in the
aggregate Woodbridges offer to the Dissenting Holders. However, the appraisal rights litigation
is currently ongoing and its outcome is uncertain. As a result, there is no assurance as to the
amount of the payment that will ultimately be required to be made to the Dissenting Holders, which
amount may be greater than the $4.6 million that we have accrued.
Core Communities
During 2009, the recession continued and the demand for residential and commercial inventory
showed no signs of recovery, particularly in the geographic regions where Cores properties are
located. The decrease in land sales in 2009 and continued cash flow deficits contributed to,
among other things, the deterioration of Cores liquidity. As a result, Core has ceased all
development in Tradition, Florida and Tradition Hilton Head. Its assets have been impaired
significantly and in an effort to bring about an orderly liquidation without a bankruptcy filing,
Core commenced negotiations with all of its lenders seeking to liquidate its assets in an orderly
way. Core is currently in default under the terms of all of its outstanding debt totaling
approximately $139.4 million. During February 2010, with Cores concurrence, a significant portion
of the land in Tradition Hilton Head was placed under the control of a court appointed receiver. In
connection with the receivership, Core entered into a separate agreement with the lender that,
among other things, granted Core a right of first refusal to purchase the $25.6 million loan in the
event that the lender decides to sell the loan to a third party. This loan is collateralized by
inventory that had a net carrying value of $32.3 million, net of impairment charges during 2009 of
approximately $29.6 million. On September 1, 2010, the lender commenced an action to enforce
the guarantee executed by Core in connection with the loan transactions between the lender and Core
South Carolina, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Core. Through this action, the lender seeks to
collect on approximately $25 million of indebtedness guaranteed by Core. On October 25, 2010, Core
filed an answer and affirmative defenses asserting, among other things, that the claim on the
guarantee is not ripe given the banks election to first foreclose against the underlying
collateral. In addition, Core has raised additional equitable defenses to the claim on the
guarantee. Discovery in the case has not yet commenced, and the trial date has been set. The
amount of Cores liability, if any, in this litigation has not been established.
Separately, on April 7, 2010 and April 8, 2010, Investors Warranty of America, Inc.
(IWA) filed actions in South Carolina and Florida, respectively, against Core and certain of its
subsidiaries seeking foreclosure of mortgage loans totaling approximately $113.8 million, plus
additional interest and costs and expenses, including attorneys fees. On September 8, 2010, Core
and its applicable subsidiaries entered into an agreement with IWA, among other parties, relating
to the foreclosure proceedings. IWA subsequently assigned and conveyed its interests in both the
Florida and South Carolina loan facilities to PSL Acquisitions, LLC (PSLA). On November 8, 2010,
Core and its applicable subsidiaries, on the one hand, and PSLA, on the other hand, executed an
agreement which, upon the occurrence of certain events and subject to certain exceptions, provides
for the resolution of the disputes between them. Pursuant to the agreement, Core and its
subsidiaries agreed to, among other things, (i) pledge additional collateral to PSLA consisting of
membership interests in certain subsidiaries of Core, (ii) grant security interests in the acreage
owned by the subsidiaries in Port St. Lucie, Florida, substantially all of which is undeveloped raw
land, (iii) the amendment of the complaint related to the Florida foreclosure action to include
this additional collateral and (iv) the entry into consensual judgments of foreclosure in both
foreclosure actions. Core also agreed to cooperate with PSLA in connection with the enforcement of
its remedies against the collateral. PSLA has agreed, upon the occurrence of certain events and
subject to certain exceptions, not to enforce a deficiency judgment against Core and has released
Core from any other claims arising from or relating to the loans. As of September 30, 2010, the
net carrying value of Cores inventory collateralizing the defaulted loans that are the subject of
the foreclosure proceedings was $78.1 million, net of impairment charges during 2009 of
approximately $33.7 million. There was no impairment charge during the nine months ended September
30, 2010.
13
Table of Contents
Core was also a party to a certain Development Agreement with the city of Hardeeville, SC,
under which Core was obligated to fund $1 million towards the building of a fire station. Funding
was scheduled in three installments: the first installment of $100,000 was due on October 21, 2009;
the second installment of $450,000 was due on January 1, 2010; and the final installment of
$450,000 was due on April 1, 2010. Additionally, Core was obligated to fund certain staffing costs
of $200,000 under the terms of this agreement. Core did not pay any of the required installments
and has not funded the $200,000 payment for staffing. On November 5, 2009, Core received a notice
of default from the city for nonpayment. In the event that Core does
not make these payments, it may be unable to cure the default on its obligation to the city,
which could result in a loss of entitlements associated with the development project.
On June 10, 2010, Core sold its two commercial leasing projects referred to as the Projects
to Inland Real Estate Acquisition, Inc. (Inland) for approximately $75.4 million. As a result of
the sale, Core realized a gain on sale of discontinued operations of approximately $2.6 million in
the second quarter of 2010. The sale resulted in net cash proceeds to Core of approximately $1.5
million. See Note 5 for further information regarding the Projects.
Based on an ongoing evaluation of its cost structure and in light of current market
conditions, Core reduced its head count by 41 employees during 2009, resulting in approximately
$1.3 million in severance charges which were recorded during the fourth quarter of 2009. In the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, severance related payments at Core totaled
approximately $140,000 and $1.1 million, respectively.
The negative impact of the adverse real estate market conditions on Core, together with Cores
limited liquidity, have caused substantial doubt regarding Cores ability to continue as a going
concern. Woodbridge has not committed to fund any of Cores obligations or cash requirements, and
it is not currently anticipated that Woodbridge will provide additional funds to Core. The
consolidated financial statements and the financial information provided for Core do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. See Note 19 for Cores
results which are reported in the Real Estate Operations segment.
BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic
Both BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and BankAtlantic actively manage their liquidity and
cash flow needs. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company had cash of $12.2 million as of September 30,
2010, does not have debt maturing until March 2032 and has the ability to defer interest payments
on its junior subordinated debentures until December 2013; however, based on current interest
rates, accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $73.9 million would be due in December 2013 if
interest is deferred until that date. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys operating expenses for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $2.9 million and $7.9 million,
respectively, and $2.2 million and $5.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively. BankAtlantics liquidity is dependent, in part, on its ability to maintain or
increase deposit levels and the availability of borrowings under its lines of credit and Treasury
and Federal Reserve lending programs. As of September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic had $338 million of
cash and short-term investments and approximately $915 million of available unused borrowings,
consisting of $516 million of unused FHLB line of credit capacity, $391 million of unpledged
securities, and $8 million of available borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve. However, such
available borrowings are subject to regular reviews and may be terminated, suspended or reduced at
any time. Additionally, interest rate changes, additional collateral requirements, disruptions in
the capital markets or deterioration in BankAtlantics financial condition, litigation or
regulatory action may make borrowings unavailable or make terms of the borrowings and deposits less
favorable. As a result, BankAtlantics cost of funds could increase and the availability of funding
sources could decrease.
The substantial uncertainties throughout the Florida and national economies and the U.S.
banking industry coupled with current market conditions have adversely affected BankAtlantic
Bancorps and BankAtlantics results. As of September 30, 2010, BankAtlantics capital was in
excess of all regulatory well capitalized levels. However, the OTS, in its discretion, can at
any time require an institution to maintain capital amounts and ratios
14
Table of Contents
above the established well capitalized requirements and otherwise restrict operations based
on its view of the risk profile of the specific institution. BankAtlantics communications with the
OTS include providing information on an ad-hoc, one-time or regular basis related to areas of
regulatory oversight and bank operations. As part of such communications, BankAtlantic has and
will continue to provide to its regulators, forecasts, strategic business plans and other
information relating to anticipated asset balances, asset quality, capital levels, expenses,
anticipated earnings and levels of brokered deposits and liquidity. Additionally, BankAtlantic is
subject to various restrictions, the most significant of which include that BankAtlantic will not,
unless pursuant to an approved business plan or permitted by the OTS, increase its assets,
originate or purchase new commercial real estate loans, acquire or renew brokered deposits or pay
dividends to BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company. Further, it will not solicit deposits by
offering interest rates more than 75 basis points over the local market area rate. BankAtlantic
currently expects to receive formal communication from the OTS that we anticipate will require
BankAtlantic to maintain regulatory capital ratios at levels above the minimum amounts required for
well capitalized institutions. Higher capital requirements could require BankAtlantic to raise
additional capital or to reduce its asset size further, making it more difficult to achieve
profitability. There is no assurance that the BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company or BankAtlantic
would be successful in raising additional capital on favorable terms or at all, and if successful,
may involve the issuance of securities in transactions highly dilutive to BankAtlantic Bancorps
existing shareholders, including BFC. If BankAtlantic is not able to meet higher regulatory
capital requirements, BankAtlantics results of operations would be materially adversely impacted.
Although BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic have experienced operating losses since June 2007,
BankAtlantic Bancorp believes that it maintains sufficient liquidity to fund operations at least
through September 30, 2011. However, if unanticipated market factors emerge and/or BankAtlantic
Bancorp is unable to execute its plans or if BankAtlantic or BankAtlantic Bancorp requires capital
and BankAtlantic Bancorp is unable to raise capital, it could have a material adverse impact on the
Companys business, results of operations and financial condition.
4. Share Acquisitions
Bluegreen Share Acquisition
On November 16, 2009, approximately 7.4 million shares of common stock of Bluegreen were
purchased for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $23 million, increasing our interest
from 9.5 million shares, or 29%, of Bluegreens common stock to 16.9 million shares, or 52%, of
Bluegreens common stock. As a result, the Company now holds a controlling interest in Bluegreen
and, in accordance with GAAP, the Company consolidates all of Bluegreens wholly-owned
subsidiaries and entities in which Bluegreen holds a controlling financial interest. The Company
also consolidates Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations, LLC (the Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture), in
which Bluegreen holds a 51% equity interest, has an active role as the day-to-day manager of its
activities, and has majority voting control of its management committee. The operating results of
Bluegreen are included in the Companys Bluegreen Resorts and Bluegreen Communities segments.
As part of the accounting for the November 2009 Bluegreen share acquisition, management is
continuing to evaluate the fair value of Bluegreens inventory and certain of Bluegreens
contracts, and as such, certain amounts at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2010 are estimates
and are subject to revision as more detailed analyses are completed and additional information
becomes available. Any change resulting from the final evaluation of the inventory and contracts of
Bluegreen as of the acquisition date may change the amount of the $183.1 million bargain purchase
gain recorded during the fourth quarter of 2009.
Additional Shares Purchased in BankAtlantic Bancorps Rights Offering
On June 18, 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp commenced a rights offering (the Rights Offering) to
its shareholders of record as of the close of business on June 14, 2010 (the Record Date). In
the Rights Offering, BankAtlantic Bancorp distributed to each eligible shareholder 0.327
subscription rights for each share of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock owned as of the close of business on the Record Date. Fractional subscription rights
were rounded up to the next largest whole number. Each subscription right entitled the holder
thereof to purchase one share of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock at the purchase price
of $1.50 per share. Shareholders who exercised their basic subscription rights in full were also
given the opportunity to request to purchase any additional shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps
Class A Common Stock that remained unsubscribed for at the expiration of the Rights Offering at the
same $1.50 per share purchase price. The Rights Offering expired on July 20, 2010.
15
Table of Contents
As previously disclosed, BFC acquired an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A Common Stock in the Rights Offering for an aggregate purchase price of $15.0
million. BFC exercised its basic subscription rights to purchase 5,986,865 shares, and the
remaining 4,013,135 shares were acquired by BFC pursuant to its over-subscription request. The
shares acquired in the Rights Offering increased BFCs ownership interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp
by approximately 8% to 45% and BFCs voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 5%
to 71%.
BFCs acquisition of shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock in the Rights
Offering was accounted for as an equity transaction in accordance with applicable Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) authoritative guidance which provides that changes in a
parents ownership interest which do not result in the parent losing its controlling interest are
reported as equity transactions.
5. Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale
Real Estate Discontinued Operations
Core Communities
In December 2009, Core Communities reinitiated efforts to sell the Projects, its two
commercial leasing projects, and began soliciting bids from several potential buyers for the
immediate sale of the Projects in their present condition. Due to this decision, the assets
associated with the Projects were classified as discontinued operations in accordance with the
accounting guidance for the disposal of long-lived assets.
The assets were reclassified as assets held for sale and the liabilities related to these
assets were reclassified as liabilities related to assets held for sale in the Consolidated
Statement of Financial Condition at December 31, 2009. Additionally, the results of operations for
the Projects were reclassified to income from discontinued operations in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and the nine months
ended September 30, 2010. Depreciation related to these assets held for sale ceased in December
2009. The Company elected not to separate these assets in the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Management reviewed the net asset
value and estimated the fair market value of the assets based on the bids received related to these
assets and determined that an impairment charge was necessary to write down the aggregate carrying
value of the Projects to fair value less the estimated costs to sell and, accordingly, recorded an
impairment charge of approximately $13.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2009.
On June 10, 2010, Core sold the Projects to Inland for approximately $75.4 million. As a
result of the sale, a gain on sale of discontinued operations of approximately $2.6 million was
realized in the second quarter of 2010. In connection with the sale, the lender reduced the
outstanding balance of the loans related to the assets held for sale by approximately $800,000 as a
result of negotiations with the lender. Core used the proceeds from the sale to Inland to repay
these loans. As a result, Core was released from its obligations with the lender.
The following table summarizes information regarding the assets held for sale and liabilities
related to the assets held for sale for the Projects (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Restricted cash |
$ | | 538 | |||||
Property and equipment, net |
| 61,588 | ||||||
Other assets |
| 9,774 | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
$ | | 71,900 | |||||
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other |
$ | | 1,602 | |||||
Notes and mortgage payable |
| 74,749 | ||||||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
$ | | 76,351 | |||||
16
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the results of operations for the Projects (in thousands):
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | | 2,161 | 2,951 | 6,344 | |||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
| 3,028 | 3,103 | 7,876 | ||||||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
| (867 | ) | (152 | ) | (1,532 | ) | |||||||||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
| | 2,617 | | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | | (867 | ) | 2,465 | (1,532 | ) | |||||||||
Financial Services- Discontinued Operations
On February 28, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp sold Ryan Beck to Stifel. The Stifel sales
agreement provided for contingent earn-out payments, payable in cash or shares of Stifel common
stock, at Stifels election, based on certain defined Ryan Beck revenues during the two-year period
immediately following the Ryan Beck sale, which ended on February 28, 2009, and required
BankAtlantic Bancorp to indemnify Stifel for certain losses arising out of activities of Ryan Beck
prior to the sale and asserted through September 30, 2009. BankAtlantic Bancorp recognized $4.2
million of earn-out consideration during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and BankAtlantic
Bancorp received $3.7 million in proceeds net of a $0.5 million indemnification obligation. In
October 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp received notice from Stifel that Stifel believes that
BankAtlantic Bancorp is obligated to pay Stifel an additional $1.2 million based on such
indemnification obligation. Management of BankAtlantic Bancorp believes that it has no liability
beyond the previously satisfied $0.5 million indemnification obligation and accordingly, no
additional obligation was recognized in connection with the indemnification obligation under the
Ryan Beck sales agreement at September 30, 2010.
Financial Services- Assets Held for Sale
In August 2010, BankAtlantic announced that, due to the rapidly changing environment in
Florida and the banking industry, it decided to focus on its core markets in South Florida and
BankAtlantic began seeking a buyer for its Tampa operations which includes 19 branches.
BankAtlantic engaged an investment banking firm to assist it in selling the Tampa operations. As a
consequence, BankAtlantic reclassified its fixed assets related to the anticipated branch sale to
held-for-sale and recognized a $4.5 million impairment as these held-for-sale assets are accounted
for at the lower of cost or fair value.
The assets and liabilities associated with the Tampa operations as of September 30, 2010 were
as follows:
ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4,902 | ||
Office properties and equipment |
32,307 | |||
Total assets held for sale |
$ | 37,209 | ||
LIABILITIES |
||||
Interest bearing deposits |
$ | 259,893 | ||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
79,467 | |||
Total deposits |
339,360 | |||
Accrued interest payable |
100 | |||
Total liabilities held for sale |
$ | 339,460 | ||
BankAtlantic anticipates that the sale of the Tampa operations would reduce annual
non-interest expenses by approximately $15 million to $20 million. However, there is no assurance that
management will be able to sell its Tampa operations at acceptable terms or at all, and the terms
of any such sale are uncertain.
17
Table of Contents
6. Fair Value Measurement
The following tables present major categories of the Companys assets measured at estimated
fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
September 30, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Description | 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 123,927 | | 123,927 | | |||||||||||
REMICS (1) |
78,805 | | 78,805 | | ||||||||||||
Agency bonds |
90,375 | | 90,375 | | ||||||||||||
Municipal bonds |
152,177 | | 152,177 | | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency put options |
95 | 95 | | | ||||||||||||
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock |
21,393 | | | 21,393 | ||||||||||||
Other equity securities |
23,957 | 23,957 | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 490,729 | 24,052 | 445,284 | 21,393 | |||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
December 31, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Description | 2009 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 211,945 | | 211,945 | | |||||||||||
REMICS (1) |
107,347 | | 107,347 | | ||||||||||||
Other bonds |
250 | | | 250 | ||||||||||||
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock |
17,766 | | | 17,766 | ||||||||||||
Other equity securities |
9,067 | 9,067 | | | ||||||||||||
Total securities available for sale
at fair value |
346,375 | 9,067 | 319,292 | 18,016 | ||||||||||||
Retained interest in notes
receivable sold |
26,340 | | | 26,340 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 372,715 | 9,067 | 319,292 | 44,356 | |||||||||||
(1) | Real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICS) are pass-through entities that hold residential loans. Investors in these entities are issued ownership interests in the entities in the form of a bond. The securities are guaranteed by government agencies. |
There were no recurring liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the
Companys financial statements.
The following tables present major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||
Benihana | ||||||||||||
Other | Convertible | |||||||||||
Bonds | Preferred Stock | Total | ||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 250 | 20,159 | 20,409 | ||||||||
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized) |
||||||||||||
Included in earnings |
| | | |||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
| 1,234 | 1,234 | |||||||||
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
(250 | ) | | (250 | ) | |||||||
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
| | | |||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | | 21,393 | 21,393 | ||||||||
18
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Benihana | ||||||||||||||||
Convertible | Equity | |||||||||||||||
Other Bonds | Preferred Stock | Securities | Total | |||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 250 | 20,511 | 210 | 20,971 | |||||||||||
Total gains and losses
(realized/unrealized) |
||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive
income |
| 773 | (46 | ) | 727 | |||||||||||
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
$ | 250 | 21,284 | 164 | 21,698 | |||||||||||
The following tables present major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands): | ||||||||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Retained | ||||||||||||||||
Interests in | Benihana | |||||||||||||||
Notes | Other | Convertible | ||||||||||||||
Receivable Sold | Bonds | Preferred Stock | Total | |||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 26,340 | 250 | 17,766 | 44,356 | |||||||||||
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized) |
||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle (1) |
(26,340 | ) | | | (26,340 | ) | ||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
| | 3,627 | 3,627 | ||||||||||||
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
| (250 | ) | | (250 | ) | ||||||||||
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | | | 21,393 | 21,393 | |||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Benihana | ||||||||||||||||
Other | Convertible | Equity | ||||||||||||||
Bonds | Preferred Stock | Securities | Total | |||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 250 | 16,426 | 1,588 | 18,264 | |||||||||||
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized) |
||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings (2) |
| | (1,378 | ) | (1,378 | ) | ||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
| 4,858 | (46 | ) | 4,812 | |||||||||||
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
$ | 250 | 21,284 | 164 | 21,698 | |||||||||||
(1) | Retained interests in notes receivable sold was eliminated upon a change in accounting principle. For further information see Note 2. | |
(2) | The $1.4 million loss represented an other-than-temporary impairment associated with a decline in value related to an equity investment in an unrelated financial institution. |
The valuation techniques and the inputs used in our financial statements to measure the fair
value of our recurring financial instruments are described below.
The fair values of agency bonds, municipal bonds mortgage-backed and real estate mortgage
conduit securities are estimated using independent pricing sources and matrix pricing. Matrix
pricing uses a market approach valuation technique and Level 2 valuation inputs as quoted market
prices are not available for the specific securities that BankAtlantic Bancorp owns. The
independent pricing sources value these securities using observable market inputs including:
benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads and other reference data
in the secondary institutional market which is the principal market for these types of assets. To
validate fair values obtained from the pricing sources, BankAtlantic Bancorp reviews fair value
estimates obtained from brokers, investment advisors and others to determine the reasonableness of
the fair values obtained from independent pricing
19
Table of Contents
sources. BankAtlantic Bancorp reviews any price that it determines may not be reasonable and
requires the pricing sources to explain the differences in fair value or reevaluate its fair
value.
Other bonds and equity securities are generally fair valued using the market approach and
quoted market prices (Level 1) or matrix pricing (Level 2 or Level 3) with inputs obtained from
independent pricing sources, if available. Also non-binding broker quotes are obtained to validate
fair values obtained from matrix pricing. However, for certain equity and debt securities in which
observable market inputs cannot be obtained, these securities are valued either using the income
approach and pricing models that BankAtlantic Bancorp has developed or based on observable market
data that BankAtlantic Bancorp adjusted based on judgment of the factors BankAtlantic Bancorp
believes a market participant would use to value the securities (Level 3).
The fair value of foreign currency put options was obtained using the market approach and
quoted market prices using Level 1 inputs.
The estimated fair value of the Companys investment in Benihanas Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock (Convertible Preferred Stock) was assessed using the income approach with Level 3
inputs by discounting future cash flows at a market discount rate combined with the fair value of
the underlying shares of Benihanas common stock that BFC would receive upon conversion of its
shares of Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock.
The following tables present major categories of assets measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in | ||||||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||||||||
for Identical | Other Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Description | 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Impairments | |||||||||||||||
Loans measured for
impairment using the
fair value of the
underlying collateral |
$ | 304,275 | | | 304,275 | $ | 93,649 | |||||||||||||
Impaired real estate
assets
held for sale |
13,964 | | | 13,964 | 4,469 | |||||||||||||||
Impaired real estate
owned |
10,437 | | | 10,437 | 1,864 | |||||||||||||||
Impaired real estate held
for development and
sale |
3,490 | | | 3,490 | 1,532 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 332,166 | | | 332,166 | $ | 101,514 | |||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in | ||||||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||||||||
for Identical | Other Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Description | 2009 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Impairments | |||||||||||||||
Loans measured for
impairment using the
fair value of the
underlying collateral |
$ | 219,173 | | | 219,173 | $ | 78,710 | |||||||||||||
Impaired real estate
owned |
4,373 | | | 4,373 | 760 | |||||||||||||||
Impaired real estate
inventory |
162,676 | | | 162,676 | 32,759 | |||||||||||||||
Impaired goodwill |
| | | | 10,542 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in Bluegreen |
29,028 | 29,028 | | | 31,181 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 415,250 | 29,028 | | 386,222 | $ | 153,952 | |||||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
There were no material liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in the
Companys financial statements.
Loans Receivable Measured For Impairment
Impaired loans receivable are generally valued based on the fair value of the underlying
collateral. BankAtlantic Bancorp primarily uses third party appraisals to assist in measuring
non-homogenous impaired loans. These appraisals generally use the market or income approach
valuation technique and use market observable data to formulate an opinion of the estimated fair
value of the loans collateral. However, the appraiser uses professional judgment in determining
the fair value of the collateral or properties, and these values may also be adjusted for changes
in market conditions subsequent to the appraisal date. When current appraisals are not available
for certain loans receivable, judgment on market conditions is used to adjust the most current
appraisal. The sales prices may reflect prices of sales contracts not closed, and the amount of
time required to sell out the real estate project may be derived from current appraisals of similar
projects. As a consequence, the calculation of the estimated fair value of the collateral uses
Level 3 inputs. BankAtlantic Bancorp generally uses third party broker price opinions or an
automated valuation service to measure the fair value of the collateral for impaired homogenous
loans in the establishment of specific reserves or charge-downs when these loans become 120 days
delinquent. The third party valuations from real estate professionals also use Level 3 inputs in
the determination of the fair values.
Impaired Real Estate and Assets Held for Sale
Real estate is generally valued with the assistance of third party appraisals or broker price
opinions. These appraisals generally use the market approach valuation technique and use market
observable data to formulate an opinion of the fair value of the properties. However, the
appraisers or brokers use professional judgments in determining the fair value of the properties
and these values may also be adjusted for changes in market conditions subsequent to the valuation
date. As a consequence of using broker price opinions and adjustments to appraisals, the fair
values of the properties are considered a Level 3 valuation.
Impaired Goodwill
In determining the estimated fair value of BankAtlantic Bancorps reporting units in the test
of goodwill for impairment, BankAtlantic Bancorp uses discounted cash flow valuation techniques.
This method requires assumptions for expected cash flows and applicable discount rates. The
aggregate fair value of all reporting units derived from the above valuation methodology was
compared to BankAtlantic Bancorps market capitalization adjusted for a control premium in order to
determine the reasonableness of the financial model output. A control premium represents the value
an investor would pay above minority interest transaction prices in order to obtain a controlling
interest in the respective company. BankAtlantic Bancorp used financial projections over a period
of time considered necessary to achieve a steady state of cash flows for each reporting unit. The
primary assumptions in the projections include anticipated growth in loans, tax certificates,
securities, interest rates and revenue. The discount rates are estimated based on a Capital Asset
Pricing Model, which considers the risk-free interest rate, market risk premium, beta, and
unsystematic risk and size premium adjustments specific to a particular reporting unit. The
estimated fair value of a reporting unit is highly sensitive to changes in the discount rate and
terminal value assumptions and, accordingly, minor changes in these assumptions could significantly
impact the fair value assigned to a reporting unit. Future potential changes in these assumptions
may impact the estimated fair value of a reporting unit and cause the fair value of the reporting
unit to be below its carrying value. As a result of the significant judgments used in determining
the fair value of the reporting units, the fair values of the reporting units use Level 3 inputs in
the determination of fair value.
Included on the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009 is goodwill of $12.2 million associated with BankAtlantics capital
services reporting unit which was tested for potential impairment on September 30, 2010 (the annual
testing date) and was determined not to be impaired. As of September 30, 2010 the estimated fair
value of BankAtlantics capital services reporting unit exceeded the estimated fair value of the
underlying assets by $20.0 million. If market conditions do not improve or deteriorate further,
goodwill impairments charges may be recognized in future periods.
21
Table of Contents
Financial Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following table presents information for financial instruments at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||||||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 385,874 | 385,874 | 316,080 | 316,080 | |||||||||||
Interest bearing deposits in
other financial institutions |
47,990 | 47,990 | | | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
62,748 | 62,748 | 24,020 | 24,020 | ||||||||||||
Securities available for sale |
490,634 | 490,634 | 346,375 | 346,375 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives |
95 | 95 | | | ||||||||||||
Investment securities |
1,981 | 1,981 | 9,654 | 9,654 | ||||||||||||
Tax certificates |
104,681 | 105,723 | 110,991 | 112,472 | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
45,259 | 45,259 | 48,751 | 48,751 | ||||||||||||
Retained interest in notes receivable sold |
| | 26,340 | 26,340 | ||||||||||||
Loans receivable including
loans held for sale, net |
3,229,554 | 2,859,955 | 3,683,441 | 3,381,796 | ||||||||||||
Notes receivable |
598,693 | 628,000 | 277,274 | 277,274 | ||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 3,833,268 | 3,836,626 | 3,948,818 | 3,950,840 | |||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
180,000 | 179,935 | 282,012 | 282,912 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase and short term borrowings |
20,948 | 20,948 | 27,271 | 27,271 | ||||||||||||
Receivable-backed notes payable |
590,052 | 575,832 | 237,416 | 237,416 | ||||||||||||
Notes and mortgage notes payable and
other borrowings |
357,123 | 354,987 | 395,361 | 392,047 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage payables associated with
assets held for sale from
discontinued operations |
| | 74,749 | 74,749 | ||||||||||||
Junior subordinated debentures |
457,699 | 216,213 | 447,211 | 170,598 |
Management has made estimates of fair value that it believes to be reasonable. However,
because there is no active market for many of these financial instruments and management has
derived the fair value of the majority of these financial instruments using the income approach
technique with Level 3 unobservable inputs, there is no assurance that the estimated value would be
received upon sale or disposition of the asset or pay the estimated value upon disposition of the
liability in advance of its scheduled maturity. Management estimates used in its net present value
financial models rely on assumptions and judgments regarding issues where the outcome is unknown
and actual results or values may differ significantly from these estimates. The Companys fair
value estimates do not consider the tax effect that would be associated with the disposition of the
assets or liabilities at their fair value estimates.
Interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions are certificates of deposits
guaranteed by the FDIC with maturities of less than one year. Due to the FDIC guarantee and the
short maturity of these certificates of deposit, the fair value of these deposits approximates the
carrying value.
Fair values are estimated for loan portfolios with similar financial characteristics. Loans
receivable are segregated by category, and each loan category is further segmented into fixed and
adjustable interest rate categories and into performing and non-performing categories.
The fair value of performing loans is calculated by using an income approach with Level 3
inputs. The fair value of performing loans is estimated by discounting forecasted cash flows
through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the interest rate
risk inherent in the loan portfolio. The estimate of
22
Table of Contents
average maturity is based on BankAtlantic Bancorps historical experience with prepayments for each
loan classification, modified as required, by an estimate of the effect of current economic and
lending conditions. Management of BankAtlantic Bancorp assigns a credit risk premium and an
illiquidity adjustment to these loans based on risk grades and delinquency status.
The fair value of tax certificates was calculated using the income approach with Level 3
inputs. The fair value is based on discounted expected cash flows using discount rates that we
believe take into account the risk of the cash flows of tax certificates relative to alternative
investments.
The fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank stock is its carrying amount.
The fair values of Bluegreen notes receivable are based on estimated future cash flows
considering contractual payments and estimates of prepayments and defaults, discounted at a market
rate.
As permitted by applicable accounting guidance, the fair value of deposits with no stated
maturity, such as non-interest bearing demand deposits, savings and NOW accounts, and money market
and checking accounts, is shown in the above table at its book value. The fair value of
certificates of deposit is based on an income approach with Level 3 inputs. The fair value is
calculated by using the discounted value of contractual cash flows with the discount rate estimated
using current rates offered by BankAtlantic for similar remaining maturities.
The fair value of short-term borrowings is calculated using the income approach with Level 2
inputs. Contractual cash flows are discounted based on current interest rates. The carrying value
of these borrowings approximates fair value as maturities are generally less than thirty days.
The fair value of FHLB advances was calculated using the income approach with Level 2 inputs.
The fair value was based on discounted cash flows using rates offered for debt with comparable
terms to maturity and issuer credit standing.
The fair values of BankAtlantics subordinated debentures were based on discounted values of
contractual cash flows at a market discount rate adjusted for non-performance risk.
The estimated fair values of notes and mortgage notes payable and other borrowings, including
receivable-backed notes payable were based upon current rates and spreads it would pay to obtain
similar borrowings and also used discounted values of contractual cash flows at a market discount
rate.
The fair value of BankAtlantic Bancorps mortgage-backed bonds included in notes and mortgage
notes payable and other borrowings as of December 31, 2009 was based on discounted values of
contractual cash flows at a market discount rate. The mortgage-backed bonds were retired during
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 resulting in a $7,000 loss.
In determining the fair value of BankAtlantic Bancorps junior subordinated debentures,
BankAtlantic Bancorp used NASDAQ price quotes available with respect to its $66.1 million of
publicly traded trust preferred securities related to its junior subordinated debentures (public
debentures). However, $252.7 million of the outstanding trust preferred securities related to its
junior subordinated debentures are not traded, but are privately held in pools (private
debentures) and with no liquidity or readily determinable source for valuation. BankAtlantic
Bancorp has deferred the payment of interest with respect to all of its junior subordinated
debentures as permitted by the terms of these securities. Based on the deferral status and the lack
of liquidity and ability of a holder to actively sell such private debentures, the fair value of
these private debentures may be subject to a greater discount to par and have a lower fair value
than indicated by the public debenture price quotes. However, due to their private nature and the
lack of a trading market, fair value of the private debentures was not readily determinable at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and as a practical alternative, BankAtlantic Bancorp used
the NASDAQ price quotes of the public debentures to value its remaining outstanding junior
subordinated debentures whether privately held or publicly traded.
The estimated fair value of Woodbridges and Bluegreens junior subordinated debentures as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were based on a discounted value of contractual cash flows
at a market discount rate or market price quotes from the over-the-counter bond market.
23
Table of Contents
The carrying amount and fair values of BankAtlantics commitments to extend credit, standby
letters of credit, financial guarantees and forward commitments are not considered significant.
(See Note 20 for the contractual amounts of BankAtlantics financial instrument commitments.)
7. Securities Available for Sale
The following tables summarize securities available for sale (in thousands):
As of September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Government agency securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 116,836 | 7,091 | | 123,927 | |||||||||||
Agency bonds |
89,996 | 379 | | 90,375 | ||||||||||||
REMICS (1) |
75,602 | 3,203 | | 78,805 | ||||||||||||
Total |
282,434 | 10,673 | | 293,107 | ||||||||||||
Investment Securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds |
152,183 | 71 | 77 | 152,177 | ||||||||||||
Other bonds |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock |
16,426 | 4,967 | | 21,393 | ||||||||||||
Equity and other securities |
23,773 | 186 | 2 | 23,957 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
192,382 | 5,224 | 79 | 197,527 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 474,816 | 15,897 | 79 | 490,634 | |||||||||||
As of December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Government agency securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 202,985 | 8,961 | 1 | 211,945 | |||||||||||
REMICS (1) |
104,329 | 3,037 | 19 | 107,347 | ||||||||||||
Total |
307,314 | 11,998 | 20 | 319,292 | ||||||||||||
Investment Securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Other bonds |
250 | | | 250 | ||||||||||||
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock |
16,426 | 1,340 | | 17,766 | ||||||||||||
Equity and other securities |
8,947 | 126 | 6 | 9,067 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
25,623 | 1,466 | 6 | 27,083 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 332,937 | 13,464 | 26 | 346,375 | |||||||||||
(1) | REMICS are pass-through entities that hold residential loans. Investors in these entities are issued ownership interests in the entities in the form of a bond. The securities are guaranteed by government agencies. |
The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Companys
securities available for sale with unrealized losses that are deemed temporary, aggregated by
investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
As of September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Municipal notes |
88,337 | (77 | ) | | | 88,337 | (77 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
| | 8 | (2 | ) | 8 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total available for
sale securities: |
$ | 88,337 | (77 | ) | 8 | (2 | ) | 88,345 | (79 | ) | ||||||||||||||
24
Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | | | 159 | (1 | ) | 159 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||
REMICS |
| | 21,934 | (19 | ) | 21,934 | (19 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
4 | (6 | ) | | | 4 | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total available
for sale securities: |
$ | 4 | (6 | ) | 22,093 | (20 | ) | 22,097 | (26 | ) | ||||||||||||||
The unrealized losses on the equity securities are insignificant. The municipal notes
are insured general obligations of the municipality and have maturities of approximately one year
or less and BankAtlantic expects to receive its entire investment in the note upon maturity.
Accordingly, BankAtlantic Bancorp does not consider these investments other-than-temporarily
impaired at September 30, 2010.
Unrealized losses on mortgage-backed and REMICS securities outstanding at December 31, 2009
were primarily the result of interest rate changes. These securities are guaranteed by government
sponsored enterprises. These securities are of high credit quality, and management of BankAtlantic
Bancorp believed that the securities would recover their losses in the foreseeable future. Further,
management of BankAtlantic Bancorp did not intend to sell these debt securities and did not believe
that it would be required to sell these debt securities before the price recovers.
The scheduled maturities of debt securities available for sale were (in thousands):
Debt Securities | ||||||||
Available for Sale | ||||||||
Estimated | ||||||||
Amortized | Fair | |||||||
Cost | Value | |||||||
September 30, 2010 (1) |
||||||||
Due within one year |
$ | 143,652 | 143,642 | |||||
Due after one year, but within five years |
98,595 | 98,980 | ||||||
Due after five years, but within ten years |
27,057 | 28,088 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
165,313 | 174,574 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 434,617 | 445,284 | |||||
(1) | Scheduled maturities in the above table are based on contractual maturities which may vary significantly from actual maturities due to prepayments. |
Securities activities in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows were (in thousands):
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Gross gains on securities sales |
$ | | 4,774 | 3,138 | 11,284 | |||||||||||
Gross losses on securities sales |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Proceed from sales of securities |
18,569 | 113,073 | 92,109 | 318,779 | ||||||||||||
Management reviews its investment portfolios for other-than-temporary declines in value
quarterly. As a consequence of BankAtlantic Bancorps review during 2009, the Company recognized
$1.4 million of other-than-temporary declines in value related to an equity investment in an
unrelated financial institution.
25
Table of Contents
BFC Benihana Investment
The Company owns 800,000 shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock. The Convertible
Preferred Stock is convertible into an aggregate of 1,578,943 shares of Benihanas Common Stock at
a conversion price of $12.67, subject to adjustment from time to time upon certain defined events.
Based on the number of currently outstanding shares of Benihanas capital stock, the Convertible
Preferred Stock, if converted, would represent an approximately 19% voting interest and an
approximately 9% economic interest in Benihana.
The Convertible Preferred Stock was acquired pursuant to an agreement with Benihana on June 8,
2004 to purchase an aggregate of 800,000 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock for $25.00 per
share. The shares of the Convertible Preferred Stock have voting rights on an as if converted
basis together with Benihanas Common Stock on all matters put to a vote of the holders of
Benihanas Common Stock. The approval of a majority of the holders of the Convertible Preferred
Stock then outstanding, voting as a single class, is required for certain events outside the
ordinary course of business. The Company is entitled to receive cumulative quarterly dividends on
the Convertible Preferred Stock at an annual rate equal to $1.25 per share, payable on the last day
of each calendar quarter. The Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory redemption at the
original issue price of $20 million plus accumulated dividends on July 2, 2014 unless the Company
elects to extend the mandatory redemption date to a later date not to extend beyond July 2, 2024.
At September 30, 2010, the closing price of Benihanas Common Stock was $7.75 per share. The
market value of the Convertible Preferred Stock if converted at September 30, 2010 would have been
approximately $12.2 million.
At September 30, 2010, the Companys estimated fair value of its investment in Benihanas
Convertible Preferred Stock was approximately $21.4 million, which includes a gross unrealized gain
of approximately $3.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The estimated fair
value of the Companys investment in Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock was assessed using the
income approach with Level 3 inputs by discounting future cash flows at a market discount rate
combined with the fair value of the underlying shares of Benihanas Common Stock that BFC would
receive upon conversion of its shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock.
8. Derivatives
During 2010, BankAtlantic expanded its cruise ship automated teller machine (ATM) operations
and began dispensing foreign currency from certain ATMs on cruise ships. At September 30, 2010,
BankAtlantic had $7.3 million of foreign currency in cruise ship ATMs and recognized $0.8 million
and $0.1 million of foreign currency unrealized exchange gains, respectively, which were included
in Financial Services other non-interest income in the Companys statement of operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010. BankAtlantic purchased foreign currency put options as an economic hedge for
the foreign currency in its cruise ship ATMs. The terms of the put options and the fair value as
of September 30, 2010 were as follows (in thousands, except strike price):
Contract | Expiration | Strike | Fair | |||||||||||||||||
Amount | Date | Price | Premium | Value | ||||||||||||||||
| 2,800 | Nov-10 | $ | 1.34 | $ | 166 | 36 | |||||||||||||
1,600 | Dec-10 | 1.34 | 104 | 32 | ||||||||||||||||
400 | Jan-11 | 1.34 | 28 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
400 | Apr-11 | 1.34 | 31 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||
| 5,200 | $ | 329 | 95 | ||||||||||||||||
Included in Financial Services securities activities, net in the Companys Consolidated
Statement of Operations were $0.5 million and $0.2 million of unrealized losses associated with the
above put options for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. The put options were
included in derivatives in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of
September 30, 2010.
26
Table of Contents
9. Loans Receivable
The consolidated loan portfolio consisted of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Real estate loans: |
||||||||
Residential |
$ | 1,297,333 | 1,538,906 | |||||
Builder land loans |
19,826 | 57,807 | ||||||
Land acquisition and development |
140,637 | 182,235 | ||||||
Land acquisition, development and
construction |
10,766 | 26,184 | ||||||
Construction and development |
162,042 | 211,809 | ||||||
Commercial |
694,655 | 688,386 | ||||||
Consumer home equity |
619,312 | 669,690 | ||||||
Small business |
206,544 | 213,591 | ||||||
Other loans: |
||||||||
Commercial business |
140,580 | 155,226 | ||||||
Small business non-mortgage |
97,445 | 99,113 | ||||||
Consumer loans |
17,481 | 15,935 | ||||||
Deposit overdrafts |
3,886 | 4,816 | ||||||
Total gross loans |
3,410,507 | 3,863,698 | ||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||
Premiums, discounts and net deferred fees |
2,155 | 2,414 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(185,947 | ) | (187,218 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable net |
$ | 3,226,715 | 3,678,894 | |||||
Loans held for sale |
$ | 2,839 | 4,547 | |||||
Loans held for sale at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are loans originated with the
assistance of an independent mortgage company. The mortgage company provides processing and
closing assistance to BankAtlantic. Pursuant to an agreement, the mortgage company purchases the
loans from BankAtlantic within a defined period of time after the date of funding. BankAtlantic
earns the interest income during the period that BankAtlantic owns the loan. Gains from the sale
of loans held for sale were $28,000 and $169,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, respectively, and were $134,000 and $397,000 for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009, respectively.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp sold a non-residential
commercial loan for net proceeds of $2.5 million. BankAtlantic Bancorp incurred a $0.2 million
charge-off on the loan upon sale and reversed a $0.2 million specific valuation allowance
established in a prior period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic
Bancorp sold builder land bank loans and land acquisition and development loans for net proceeds of
$26.9 million resulting in charge-offs of $20.1 million. However, BankAtlantic Bancorp had
previously established $17.7 million of specific valuation allowances on these loans as of December
31, 2009, and accordingly a $2.4 million additional charge-off was incurred in connection with the
sales.
Undisbursed loans in process consisted of the following components (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Construction and development |
$ | 32,988 | 43,432 | |||||
Commercial |
25,391 | 25,696 | ||||||
Total undisbursed loans in process |
$ | 58,379 | 69,128 | |||||
27
Table of Contents
Allowance for Loan Losses (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 187,862 | 172,220 | 187,218 | 137,257 | |||||||||||
Loans charged-off |
(27,309 | ) | (51,506 | ) | (107,899 | ) | (105,767 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries of loans
previously charged-off |
984 | 362 | 2,910 | 1,815 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(26,325 | ) | (51,144 | ) | (104,989 | ) | (103,952 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
24,410 | 63,586 | 103,718 | 151,357 | ||||||||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 185,947 | 184,662 | 185,947 | 184,662 | |||||||||||
The following summarizes impaired loans (in thousands):
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Gross | Specific | Gross | Specific | |||||||||||||
Recorded | Valuation | Recorded | Valuation | |||||||||||||
Investment | Allowances | Investment | Allowances | |||||||||||||
Impaired loans with specific
valuation allowances |
$ | 363,479 | 106,124 | 249,477 | 70,485 | |||||||||||
Impaired loans without
specific
valuation allowances |
191,825 | | 196,018 | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 555,304 | 106,124 | 445,495 | 70,485 | |||||||||||
Impaired loans without specific valuation allowances represent loans that were written-down to
the fair value of the collateral less cost to sell, loans in which the collateral value less cost
to sell was greater than the carrying value of the loan, loans in which the present value of the
cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate was equal to or greater than the
carrying value of the loan, or large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are
collectively measured for impairment.
BankAtlantic Bancorp continuously monitors collateral dependent loans and performs an
impairment analysis on these loans quarterly. Generally, a full appraisal is obtained when a real
estate loan is evaluated for impairment and an updated full appraisal is obtained within one year
from the prior appraisal date, or earlier if management deems it appropriate based on significant
changes in market conditions. In instances where a property is in the process of foreclosure, an
updated appraisal may be postponed beyond one year, as an appraisal is required on the date of
foreclosure; however, such loans are subject to quarterly impairment analyses. Included in total
impaired loans as of September 30, 2010 was $360.4 million of collateral dependent loans, of which
$188.9 million were measured for impairment using current appraisals and $171.5 million were
measured by adjusting appraisals that were less than one year old, as appropriate, to reflect
changes in market conditions subsequent to the last appraisal date. Appraised values were adjusted
down by an aggregate amount of $21.4 million to reflect current market conditions on 21 loans due
to property value declines since the last appraisal dates.
As of September 30, 2010, impaired loans with specific valuation allowances had been
previously written down by $64.5 million and impaired loans without specific valuation allowances
had been previously written down by $74.6 million. BankAtlantic had commitments to lend $9.8
million of additional funds on impaired loans as of September 30, 2010.
28
Table of Contents
Interest income which would have been recorded under the contractual terms of impaired
loans and the interest income actually recognized were (in thousands):
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September, 30 | Ended September, 30 | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Contracted interest income |
$ | 6,239 | 5,561 | 18,721 | 16,645 | |||||||||||
Interest income recognized |
(2,364 | ) | (1,346 | ) | (8,255 | ) | (4,848 | ) | ||||||||
Foregone interest income |
$ | 3,875 | 4,215 | 10,466 | 11,797 | |||||||||||
10. Notes Receivable
The table below sets forth information relating to Bluegreens notes receivable (in
thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Notes receivable, gross |
$ | 739,417 | 356,133 | |||||
Discount on notes receivable |
(59,970 | ) | (74,873 | ) | ||||
Notes receivable, net of discount |
679,447 | 281,260 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(80,754 | ) | (3,986 | ) | ||||
Notes receivable, net |
$ | 598,693 | 277,274 | |||||
The Company is using the expected cash flow method under the accounting guidance for
receivables to recognize interest income on the notes receivable
acquired in connection with the additional
Bluegreen share acquisition on November 16, 2009. In determining the expected cash flows, the Company
estimates credit losses and prepayments of principal. Prepayment rates used for the expected cash
flows are based upon actual experience and the rates used ranged from 5% to 9% depending on the
remaining terms of the loans. As of September 30, 2010, the outstanding contractual unpaid principal
balance and the carrying amount for the acquired notes were
$270.2 million and $210.2 million,
respectively. As of December 31, 2009, the outstanding contractual unpaid principal balance and the
carrying amount for the acquired notes were $343.8 million and $268.9 million, respectively.
The table below sets forth the activity in the allowance for uncollectible notes receivable
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ | 3,986 | ||
One-time impact of the amendment to the accounting
guidance for transfer of financial assets and the
amendment to the accounting guidance for the
consolidation of VIEs (see Note 2) |
86,252 | |||
Provision for loan losses |
42,749 | |||
Write-offs of uncollectible receivables |
(52,233 | ) | ||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 80,754 | ||
All of Bluegreens vacation ownership interests (VOIs) notes receivable, which comprise the
majority of the notes receivable, bear interest at fixed rates. The weighted-average interest rate
charged on loans secured by VOIs was 15.3% and 14.9% at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Approximately 86% of Bluegreens notes receivable secured by home sites bear interest
at variable rates, while the balance bears interest at
29
Table of Contents
fixed rates. The weighted-average interest
rate charged on notes receivable secured by home sites was 7.8% and 8.8% at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively.
Bluegreens VOI notes receivable are generally secured by properties located in Florida,
Louisiana, Nevada, New Jersey, Michigan, Missouri, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Virginia, Wisconsin, and Aruba. The majority of Bluegreen Communities notes receivable are secured
by home sites in Georgia, Texas, and Virginia.
11. Variable Interest Entities Bluegreen
In accordance with the guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities, Bluegreen
analyzes its variable interests, including loans, guarantees, and equity investments, to determine
if an entity in which it has a variable interest is a variable interest entity. Bluegreens
analysis includes both quantitative and qualitative reviews. Bluegreen bases its quantitative
analysis on the forecasted cash flows of the entity, and it bases its qualitative analysis on its
review of the design of the entity, its organizational structure including decision-making ability,
and relevant financial agreements. Bluegreen also uses qualitative analyses to determine if it must
consolidate a variable interest entity as the primary beneficiary.
Bluegreen sells through special purpose finance entities, VOI notes receivable originated by
Bluegreen Resorts. These transactions are generally structured as non-recourse to Bluegreen, with
the exception of one securitization transaction entered into on September 2, 2010, which was
guaranteed by Bluegreen (refer to the description of the Legacy Securitization in Note 15,
Receivable-Backed Notes Payable, below). These transactions are generally designed to provide
liquidity for Bluegreen and transfer the economic risks and certain of the benefits of the notes
receivable to third parties. In a securitization, various classes of debt securities are issued by
the special purpose finance entities that are generally collateralized by a single tranche of
transferred assets, which consist of VOI notes receivable. Bluegreen services the notes receivable
for a fee. With each securitization, Bluegreen generally retains a portion of the securities.
Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles that were in effect prior to 2010, seven
of Bluegreens eight special purpose finance entities then in existence met the definition of a
qualified special purpose entity, and Bluegreen was not required to consolidate those seven
entities in its financial statements. Upon the adoption of the new accounting guidance related to
transfers of financial assets (see Note 2 for additional information), Bluegreen was required to
evaluate these entities for consolidation. Since Bluegreen created these entities to serve as
financing vehicles for holding assets and related liabilities, and the entities have no equity
investment at risk, they are considered variable interest entities. Furthermore, since Bluegreen
continues to service the notes and retain rights to receive benefits that are potentially
significant to the entities, Bluegreen concluded that it is the entities primary beneficiary and,
therefore, now consolidates these entities into its financial statements. Please see Note 2 for
the impact of initial consolidation of these entities.
At September 30, 2010, the principal balance of VOI notes receivable included within the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition that are restricted to satisfy obligations
of the variable interest entities obligations totaled $551.9 million. In addition, approximately
$39.4 million of Bluegreens restricted cash is held in accounts for the benefit of the variable
interest entities. Further, at September 30, 2010, the carrying amount of the consolidated
liabilities included within the Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition for these
variable interest entities totaled $468.4 million, comprised of $444.0 million of non-recourse
receivable-backed notes payable and $24.4 million of receivable-backed notes payable which is
recourse to Bluegreen. See Note 15, Receivable-Backed Notes Payable, below.
Under the terms of Bluegreens timeshare note sales, Bluegreen has the right at its option to
repurchase or substitute for defaulted mortgage notes at the outstanding principal balance plus
accrued interest or, in some facilities, at 24% of the original sale price associated with the
defaulted mortgage note. The transaction documents typically limit such repurchases or
substitutions to 15-20% of the receivables originally funded into the transaction. Voluntary
repurchases or substitutions by Bluegreen of defaulted notes during the nine months ended September
30, 2010 were $31.7 million.
30
Table of Contents
12. Real Estate Inventory
Real estate inventory consisted of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Land and land development costs |
$ | 234,393 | 264,454 | |||||
Bluegreen Resorts |
219,260 | 222,026 | ||||||
Other costs |
526 | 552 | ||||||
Land and facilities held for sale |
6,533 | 7,259 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 460,712 | 494,291 | |||||
Inventory consisted of the combined real estate assets of Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen
Communities, Core Communities, Carolina Oak, and BankAtlantic Bancorps land facilities held for
sale.
As a result of Bluegreens continued low sales volume, reduced prices, and the impact of
reduced sales on the forecasted sell-out period of its communities projects, the Company recorded
non-cash charges to cost of sales of real estate of approximately $8.7 million, net of purchase
accounting adjustments, during the three months ended September 30, 2010, to write-down the
inventory balances of certain phases of Bluegreens completed communities properties to their
estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell.
13. Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
As previously discussed, approximately 7.4 million additional shares of Bluegreens common
stock were purchased on November 16, 2009, increasing our ownership in Bluegreen to 16.9 million
shares, or 52%, of Bluegreens outstanding common stock. As a result of the purchase, the Company
has a controlling interest in Bluegreen and, accordingly, has consolidated Bluegreens results
since November 16, 2009 into the Companys financial statements.
Prior to November 16, 2009, the investment in Bluegreen was accounted for using the equity
method of accounting. The cost of the Bluegreen investment was adjusted to recognize the Companys
interest in Bluegreens earnings or losses. The difference between a) the Companys ownership
percentage in Bluegreen multiplied by its earnings and b) the amount of the Companys equity in
earnings of Bluegreen as reflected in the Companys financial statements related to the
amortization or accretion of purchase accounting made at the time of the initial acquisition of
Bluegreens common stock and a basis difference due to impairment charges recorded on the
investment in Bluegreen, as described below. Based on the results of the quarterly evaluation of
the investment in Bluegreen, other-than temporary impairment charges of $10.8 million and $31.2
million were recorded in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
The following table shows the reconciliation of the Companys pro rata share of Bluegreens
net income to the Companys share of total earnings from Bluegreen for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009, prior to our consolidation of Bluegreen in November 2009 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||
Pro rata share of Bluegreens net income |
$ | 1,199 | 4,357 | |||||
Amortization of basis difference (a) |
10,582 | 24,474 | ||||||
Total earnings from Bluegreen Corporation |
$ | 11,781 | 28,831 | |||||
(a) | As a result of the impairment charges previously taken under the equity method prior to our consolidation of Bluegreen in November 2009, a basis difference was created between the investment in Bluegreen and the underlying assets and liabilities carried on the books of Bluegreen. Therefore, earnings from Bluegreen were adjusted each period to reflect the amortization of this basis difference. As such, a methodology was established to allocate the impairment loss to the relative estimates of the fair value of Bluegreens underlying assets based upon the position that the impairment loss was a reflection of the perceived value of these underlying assets. The appropriate amortization was calculated based on the estimated useful lives of the underlying assets and other relevant data associated with each asset category. |
31
Table of Contents
14. Goodwill
The Company tests goodwill for potential impairment annually or during interim periods if
impairment indicators exist. In response to the deteriorating economic and real estate
environments and the effects that the external environment had on BankAtlantic Bancorps business
units, BankAtlantic reduced its asset balances with a view toward strengthening its regulatory
capital ratios and revised its projected operating results to reflect a smaller organization.
Based on the results of an interim goodwill impairment evaluation undertaken during the first
quarter of 2009, an impairment charge of $8.5 million, net of purchase accounting from the step
acquisition of approximately $0.6 million, was recorded during the nine months ended September 30,
2009.
15. Notes and Mortgage Notes Payable and Other Borrowings, Receivable-Backed Notes Payable and
Junior Subordinated Debentures
Woodbridge
The development activities at Carolina Oak, which is within Tradition Hilton Head, were
suspended in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of, among other things, an overall softening of
demand for new homes and a decline in the overall economy. In 2009, the housing industry continued
to face significant challenges and Woodbridge made the decision to cease all activities at Carolina
Oak. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we reviewed the inventory of real estate at Carolina Oak for
impairment and as a result, recorded a $16.7 million impairment charge to adjust the carrying
amount of Carolina Oaks inventory to its fair value of $10.8 million. Woodbridge is the obligor
under a $37.2 million loan that is collateralized by the Carolina Oak property. During 2009, the
lender declared the loan to be in default and filed an action for foreclosure. While there may have
been an issue with respect to compliance with certain covenants in the loan agreements, we do not
believe that an event of default had occurred as was alleged. Woodbridge continues to seek a
satisfactory conclusion with regard to the debt; however, the outcome of these efforts and the
litigation is uncertain.
Core
Core is currently in default under the terms of all of its outstanding debt totaling
approximately $139.4 million. See Note 3 for additional
information.
32
Table of Contents
Bluegreen
Bluegreens pledged assets under its facilities and notes payable as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 had a carrying amount of approximately $369.1 million and $336.6 million,
respectively.
The RFA AD&C Facility. During September 2010, GMAC assigned all rights, title, and interest in
the GMAC AD&C Facility to Resort Finance America, LLC (RFA). This assignment did not affect any
of the material financial terms of the loan agreement. During the nine months ended September 30,
2010, Bluegreen repaid $23.6 million of the outstanding balance under this facility.
H4BG Communities Facility. During April 2010, GMAC assigned all rights, title, and interest in
the GMAC Communities Facility to H4BG, LP. This assignment did not affect any of the material
financial terms of the loan agreement. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Bluegreen
repaid $5.4 million on this facility.
The Wachovia Notes Payable. On April 30, 2010, Bluegreen executed an agreement with Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., the parent company of Wachovia (Wells Fargo), to refinance the remaining $21.9
million outstanding under the Wachovia Notes Payable into a new term loan. See Wells Fargo Term
Loan below for further details.
The Wachovia Line-of-Credit. On April 30, 2010, the remaining $14.5 million outstanding was
refinanced by Wells Fargo. See Wells Fargo Term Loan below for further details.
The Wells Fargo Term Loan. On April 30, 2010, Bluegreen entered into a definitive agreement
with Wells Fargo, which amended, restated and consolidated Bluegreens notes payable to Wachovia
and the line-of-credit issued by Wachovia into a single term loan with Wells Fargo (the Wells
Fargo Term Loan). The notes payable and line of credit which were consolidated into the Wells
Fargo Term Loan had a total outstanding balance of $36.4 million as of April 30, 2010. In
connection with the closing of the Wells Fargo Term Loan, Bluegreen made a principal payment of
$0.4 million, reducing the balance to $36.0 million, and paid accrued interest on the existing
Wachovia debt. The interest rate on the Wells Fargo Term Loan at September 30, 2010 was 7.13%.
Principal payments are effected through agreed-upon release prices as real estate collateralizing
the Wells Fargo Term Loan is sold, subject to minimum remaining required amortization of $2.8
million in 2010, $10.6 million in 2011 and $20.2 million in 2012. In addition to the resort
projects previously pledged as collateral for the various notes payable to Wachovia, Bluegreen
pledged additional timeshare interests, resorts real estate, and the residual interests in certain
of Bluegreens sold VOI notes receivables as collateral for the Wells Fargo Term Loan. Wells Fargo
has the right to receive as additional collateral, the residual interest in one future transaction
which creates such a retained interest. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Bluegreen
repaid $2.8 million on this facility.
Receivable-Backed Notes Payable
Bluegreens pledged receivables under its receivable-backed notes payable as of September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009 had a principal balance before purchase accounting adjustments of
approximately $697.9 million and $292.9 million, respectively.
Liberty Bank Facility. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Bluegreen pledged
$27.6 million of VOI notes receivable to this facility and received cash proceeds of $26.9 million.
Bluegreen also made repayments of $14.3 million on the facility during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010
GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Receivables Facility. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
Bluegreen repaid $6.9 million on this facility.
The Wells Fargo Facility. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Bluegreen repaid
$10.7 million on this facility.
BB&T Purchase Facility. On September 2, 2010, the BB&T Purchase Facility was
amended and restated, extending the revolving advance period under the facility to August 31, 2011.
The facility will initially revolve up to $125.0 million. During the nine months ended September
30, 2010, Bluegreen pledged $16.5 million of VOI notes receivable under the facility and received
cash proceeds of $11.2 million. On September 2, 2010, Bluegreen repaid $24.3 million of the
outstanding balance under the BB&T Purchase Facility with the proceeds generated from
33
Table of Contents
the sale of the notes in connection with the Legacy Securitization described below. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Bluegreen made total repayments of $49.0 million on the
facility.
Legacy Securitization. On September 2, 2010, Bluegreen completed a term securitization
transaction of the lowest FICO-score loans previously financed in the BB&T Purchase Facility.
Substantially all of the timeshare receivables backing the notes were generated prior to December
15, 2008, the date that Bluegreen implemented its FICO score-based credit underwriting program, and
were primarily loans with FICO scores below 600. In this private placement transaction, BXG Legacy
2010 LLC, a wholly-owned special purpose subsidiary of Bluegreen, issued $27.0 million of notes
payable secured by a portfolio of timeshare receivables totaling $36.1 million (the Legacy
Securitization). The sale of the notes generated proceeds to Bluegreen of $24.3 million before
fees and customary reserves and expenses), which were used to repay a portion of the outstanding
balance under the BB&T Purchase Facility.
National Bank of Arizona Receivables Facility. On September 30, 2010, Bluegreen/Big Cedar
Joint Venture entered into a $20.0 million timeshare receivables hypothecation facility with
National Bank of Arizona. Bluegreen Corporation has guaranteed the full payment and performance of
Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture in connection with this facility. The facility is subject to
financial covenant requirements, which include compliance by Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture with
the maximum VOI selling expenses-to-net sales ratios, and maintaining a minimum net worth balance.
Bluegreen, as a guarantor of the debt, is also subject to a minimum net worth requirement.
Receivable Backed Notes Payable Previously Reported as Off-Balance-Sheet
As discussed further in Notes 2 and 11 above, on January 1, 2010, Bluegreen consolidated seven
of its special purpose finance entities and associated receivable-backed notes payable. These
entities and their associated debt were not required to be consolidated during periods prior to
January 1, 2010. Historically, Bluegreen has been a party to a number of securitization-type
transactions, in which it sold receivables to one of its special purpose finance entities which, in
turn, sold the receivables either directly to third parties or to a trust established for the
transaction. These receivables were typically sold on a non-recourse basis (except for breaches of
certain representations and warranties). Under these arrangements, the cash payments received from
obligors on the receivables sold are generally applied monthly to pay fees to service providers,
make interest and principal payments to investors, and fund required reserves, if any, with the
remaining balance of such cash retained by Bluegreen; however, to the extent the portfolio of
receivables fails to satisfy specified performance criteria (as may occur due to an increase in
default rates or loan loss severity) or other trigger events, the funds received from obligors are
distributed on an accelerated basis to investors. Depending on the circumstances and the
transaction, the application of the accelerated payment formula may be permanent or temporary until
the trigger event is cured. As of September 30, 2010, Bluegreen believed it was in compliance in
all material respects with all applicable terms and no trigger events had occurred.
The table below sets forth the balances as of September 30, 2010 of Bluegreens
receivable-backed notes payable facilities (in thousands):
As of | ||||||||
September 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Debt | Interest | |||||||
Balance | Rate | |||||||
Non-recourse receivable-backed notes payable
previously reported as off-balance sheet (1): |
||||||||
BB&T Purchase Facility |
$ | 93,462 | 6.75 | % | ||||
GE 2004 Facility |
10,596 | 7.16 | % | |||||
2004 Term Securitization |
20,727 | 5.27 | % | |||||
2005 Term Securitization |
60,463 | 5.98 | % | |||||
GE 2006 Facility |
53,356 | 7.35 | % | |||||
2006 Term Securitization |
56,194 | 6.16 | % | |||||
2007 Term Securitization |
107,349 | 7.32 | % | |||||
2008 Term Securitization |
41,803 | 7.88 | % | |||||
Total |
$ | 443,950 | ||||||
(1) | With the exception of the BB&T Purchase Facility, non-recourse receivable-backed notes payable were reported off-balance sheet prior to January 1, 2010. |
34
Table of Contents
Junior Subordinated Debentures
As more fully described in Note 23 Junior Subordinated Debentures to the Companys audited
consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009, some of the Companys subsidiaries have formed statutory business trusts
(collectively, the Trusts), each of which issued trust preferred securities and invested the
proceeds thereof in its junior subordinated debentures. The Trusts are variable interest entities
in which the Companys subsidiaries are not the primary beneficiaries as defined by the accounting
guidance for consolidation. Accordingly, the Company does not consolidate the operations of the
Trusts; instead, the Trusts are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
On March 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by Levitt Capital Trust (LCT)
I contractually changed from a fixed-rate of 8.11% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR +
3.85% (4.14% as of September 30, 2010).
On July 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by LCT II contractually changed
from a fixed-rate of 8.09% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR + 3.80% (4.09% as of
September 30, 2010).
On March 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by Bluegreen Statutory Trust
(BST) I contractually changed from a fixed-rate of 9.160% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month
LIBOR + 4.90% (5.19% as of September 30, 2010).
On July 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by BST II and BST III
contractually changed from a fixed-rate of 9.158% and 9.193%, respectively, to a variable rate
equal to the 3-month LIBOR + 4.85% (5.14% as of September 30, 2010).
16. Development Bonds Payable
In connection with the development of certain of Cores projects, community development,
special assessment or improvement districts were established that may have utilized tax-exempt bond
financing to fund construction or acquisition of certain on-site and off-site infrastructure
improvements near or at these communities. The obligation to pay principal and interest on the
bonds issued by the districts is assigned to each parcel within the district, and a priority
assessment lien may be placed on benefited parcels to provide security for the debt service. The
bonds, including interest and redemption premiums, if any, and the associated priority lien on the
property are typically payable, secured and satisfied by revenues, fees, or assessments levied on
the property benefited. Core is required to pay the revenues, fees, and assessments levied by the
districts on the properties it still owns that are benefited by the improvements. Core may also be
required to pay down a specified portion of the bonds at the time each unit or parcel is sold. The
costs of these obligations were capitalized to inventory during the development period and
recognized as cost of sales when the properties are sold.
Cores bond financing at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of district bonds
totaling $218.7 million at each of these dates with outstanding amounts of approximately $180.8
million and $170.8 million, respectively. Bond obligations at September 30, 2010 mature in 2035
and 2040. As of September 30, 2010, Core owned approximately 4% of the property subject to
assessments within the community development district and approximately 91% of the property subject
to assessments within the special assessment district. During the three months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, Core recorded a liability of approximately $103,000 and $220,000, respectively, in
assessments on property owned by it in the districts. During the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, Core recorded a liability of approximately $328,000 and $537,000, respectively, in
assessments on property owned by it in the districts. Core is responsible for any assessed amounts
until the underlying property is sold and will continue to be responsible for the annual
assessments through the maturity dates of the respective bonds issued if the property is never
sold. Based on Cores approximate 91% ownership of property within the special assessment district
as of September 30, 2010, it will be responsible for the payment of approximately $10 million in
assessments by March 2011. If Core sells land within the special assessment district and reduces
its ownership percentage, the potential payment of approximately $10 million would decrease in
relation to the decrease in the ownership percentage. In addition, Core has guaranteed payments for
assessments under the district bonds in Tradition, Florida which would require funding if future
assessments to be allocated to property owners are insufficient to repay the bonds. Management has
evaluated this exposure based upon the criteria in accounting
35
Table of Contents
guidance for contingencies, and has determined that there have been no substantive changes to the
projected density or land use in the development subject to the bond which would make it probable
that Core would have to fund future shortfalls in assessments.
A liability was recorded for the estimated developer obligations that are fixed and
determinable and user fees that are required to be paid or transferred at the time the parcel or
unit is sold to an end user. At September 30, 2010, the liability related to developer obligations
associated with Cores ownership of the property was $175,000 after the sale of Cores commercial
leasing projects in June 2010 (See Note 5 for information relating to the sale). At December 31,
2009, the liability related to developer obligations was $3.3 million, of which $3.1 million was
included in the liabilities related to assets held for sale in the accompanying Consolidated
Statement of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2009.
17. Interest Expense
The following table is a summary of the Companys consolidated interest expense and the
amounts capitalized (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended, | For the Nine Months Ended, | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Real Estate and Other: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest incurred on borrowings |
$ | 24,889 | 3,791 | 65,074 | 11,554 | |||||||||||
Interest capitalized |
(42 | ) | (663 | ) | (227 | ) | (2,948 | ) | ||||||||
24,847 | 3,128 | 64,847 | 8,606 | |||||||||||||
Financial Services: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest on deposits |
4,877 | 9,420 | 17,954 | 33,934 | ||||||||||||
Interest on advances from FHLB |
106 | 2,494 | 1,065 | 14,740 | ||||||||||||
Interest on short term borrowings |
8 | 9 | 23 | 200 | ||||||||||||
Interest on debentures and bonds
payable |
4,135 | 3,882 | 11,879 | 12,504 | ||||||||||||
9,126 | 15,805 | 30,921 | 61,378 | |||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
$ | 33,973 | 18,933 | 95,768 | 69,984 | |||||||||||
18. Noncontrolling Interests
The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests held by others in the Companys
subsidiaries at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp |
$ | 34,860 | 88,910 | |||||
Bluegreen |
41,746 | 41,905 | ||||||
Joint ventures |
29,380 | 28,037 | ||||||
$ | 105,986 | 158,852 | ||||||
36
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests (loss) earnings recognized by
others with respect to the Companys subsidiaries for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest
Continuing Operations: |
||||||||||||||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp |
$ | (14,005 | ) | (36,493 | ) | (59,360 | ) | (96,010 | ) | |||||||
Woodbridge |
| (6,314 | ) | | 6,008 | |||||||||||
Bluegreen |
(1,144 | ) | | 156 | | |||||||||||
Joint ventures |
3,910 | (386 | ) | 6,285 | (872 | ) | ||||||||||
$ | (11,239 | ) | (43,193 | ) | (52,919 | ) | (90,874 | ) | ||||||||
Noncontrolling interest
Discontinued Operations: |
||||||||||||||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp |
$ | | (351 | ) | | 2,592 | ||||||||||
Woodbridge |
| (153 | ) | | (661 | ) | ||||||||||
$ | | (504 | ) | | 1,931 | |||||||||||
Net Loss Attributable to
Noncontrolling Interests |
$ | (11,239 | ) | (43,697 | ) | (52,919 | ) | (88,943 | ) | |||||||
19. Segment Reporting
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in
assessing performance and deciding how to allocate resources. Reportable segments consist of one or
more operating segments with similar economic characteristics, products and services, production
processes, type of customer, distribution system or regulatory environment.
The information provided for segment reporting is based on internal reports utilized by
management of the Company and its respective subsidiaries. The presentation and allocation of
assets and results of operations may not reflect the actual economic costs of the segments as stand
alone businesses. If a different basis of allocation were utilized, the relative contributions of
the segments might differ but the relative trends in segments operating results would, in
managements view, likely not be impacted.
As a result of the Woodbridge merger on September 21, 2009 and the Bluegreen share acquisition
on November 16, 2009, the Company reorganized its reportable segments to better align its segment
reporting with the current operations of its businesses. The Companys business activities
currently consist of (i) Real Estate and Other activities and (ii) Financial Services activities.
These business activities are reported through six segments: BFC Activities, Real Estate
Operations, Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen Communities, BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent
Company. As a result of this reorganization, our BFC Activities segment now includes, in addition
to other activities historically included in this segment, Woodbridge Other Operations (which was
previously a separate segment). Our Real Estate Operations segment is now comprised of what was
previously identified as our Land Division, including the real estate business activities of Core
Communities and Carolina Oak.
BFCs consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of Bluegreen since
November 16, 2009, when we acquired a controlling interest in Bluegreen. Bluegreens results of
operations are reported through the Bluegreen Resorts and Bluegreen Communities segments. Prior to
November 16, 2009, we owned approximately 9.5 million shares of Bluegreens common stock,
representing approximately 29% of such stock, the investment in Bluegreen was accounted for under
the equity method of accounting, and our interest in Bluegreens earnings and losses was included
in our BFC Activities segment. The Companys Financial Services business activities include
BankAtlantic Bancorps results of operations and are reported in two segments: BankAtlantic and
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company.
The accounting policies of the segments are generally the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009. Intersegment transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The Company
evaluates segment performance based on its segment net income (loss).
37
Table of Contents
The following summarizes the aggregation of the Companys operating segments into reportable
segments:
BFC Activities
The BFC Activities segment consists of BFC operations, our investment in Benihana, and other
operations of Woodbridge described below. BFC operations primarily consist of our corporate
overhead and general and administrative expenses, including the expenses of Woodbridge, the
financial results of a venture partnership that BFC controls and other equity investments, as well
as income and expenses associated with BFCs shared service operations which provides services,
including human resources, risk management, investor relations and executive office administration
services to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen. This segment also includes investments made by our
wholly owned subsidiary, BFC/CCC, Inc. (BFC/CCC). Other operations includes the consolidated
operations of Pizza Fusion Holdings, Inc. (Pizza Fusion), a restaurant franchisor operating
within the quick service and organic food industries, the activities of Cypress Creek Capital
Holdings, LLC (Cypress Creek Capital) and Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC (Snapper Creek)
and other investments. Prior to obtaining a controlling interest in Bluegreen on November 16, 2009,
we accounted for our investment in Bluegreen under the equity method of accounting and our interest
in Bluegreens earnings or loss was included in the BFC Activities segment.
Real Estate Operations
The Companys Real Estate Operations segment consists of the operations of Core Communities,
Carolina Oak, which was engaged in homebuilding activities in South Carolina prior to the
suspension of those activities in the fourth quarter of 2008, and Cypress Creek Holdings which
engages in leasing activities.
Bluegreen Resorts
Bluegreen Resorts develops, markets and sells VOIs in its resorts through the Bluegreen
Vacation Club. Bluegreen Resorts also provides fee-based sales, marketing, title and construction
and other management services to third-party resort developers and owners.
Bluegreen Communities
Bluegreen Communities acquires large tracts of real estate, which are subdivided, improved (in
some cases to include a golf course on the property and other related amenities) and sold,
typically on a retail basis as homesites.
BankAtlantic
The Companys BankAtlantic segment consists of the banking operations of BankAtlantic.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company
The BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company segment consists of the operations of BankAtlantic
Bancorp Parent Company, including the cost of acquisitions, asset and capital management and
financing activities and the results of BankAtlantic Bancorps asset work out subsidiary.
38
Table of Contents
The table below sets forth the Companys segment information as of and for the three month
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
BankAtlantic | Unallocated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bancorp | Amounts | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BFC | Real Estate | Bluegreen | Bluegreen | Parent | and | Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | Activities | Operations | Resorts | Communities | BankAtlantic | Company | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of real estate, net of estimated uncollectibles |
$ | | | 54,782 | 3,137 | | | | 57,919 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other resorts and communities operations revenue |
| | 17,170 | 433 | | | | 17,603 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other real estate revenues |
517 | 294 | 15,148 | | | | (17 | ) | 15,942 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
| | | | 44,331 | 80 | 21,164 | 65,575 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Services non-interest income |
| | | | 27,035 | 283 | (453 | ) | 26,865 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
517 | 294 | 87,100 | 3,570 | 71,366 | 363 | 20,694 | 183,904 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of real estate |
| | 10,473 | 11,367 | | | | 21,840 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of other resorts and communities
operations |
| | 12,535 | 866 | | | | 13,401 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,439 | 6,573 | | | 5,230 | 3,872 | 16,859 | 33,973 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
| | | | 23,012 | 1,398 | | 24,410 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
6,633 | 3,054 | 45,997 | 3,752 | | | 8,354 | 67,790 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | | | 60,756 | 2,901 | (495 | ) | 63,162 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
8,072 | 9,627 | 69,005 | 15,985 | 88,998 | 8,171 | 24,718 | 224,576 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates |
(11 | ) | | | | | 293 | 35 | 317 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
1,403 | 47 | | | | | (952 | ) | 498 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
(6,163 | ) | (9,286 | ) | 18,095 | (12,415 | ) | (17,632 | ) | (7,515 | ) | (4,941 | ) | (39,857 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
(71 | ) | | | | 37 | | (962 | ) | (996 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(6,092 | ) | (9,286 | ) | 18,095 | (12,415 | ) | (17,669 | ) | (7,515 | ) | (3,979 | ) | (38,861 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (6,092 | ) | (9,286 | ) | 18,095 | (12,415 | ) | (17,669 | ) | (7,515 | ) | (3,979 | ) | (38,861 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(11,239 | ) | (11,239 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
$ | 7,260 | (27,622 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 154,395 | 178,851 | 878,326 | 94,973 | 4,485,476 | 384,778 | (174,609 | ) | 6,002,190 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
39
Table of Contents
BankAtlantic | Unallocated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Bancorp | Amounts | |||||||||||||||||||||||
BFC | Real Estate | Parent | and | Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | Activities | Operations | BankAtlantic | Company | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of real estate, net of estimated uncollectibles |
$ | | 130 | | | | 130 | |||||||||||||||||
Other real estate revenues |
342 | 512 | | | (9 | ) | 845 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
| | 53,668 | 85 | 808 | 54,561 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial Services non-interest income |
| | 35,304 | 141 | (391 | ) | 35,054 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
342 | 642 | 88,972 | 226 | 408 | 90,590 | ||||||||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of real estate |
4,136 | 18,144 | | | 9,384 | 31,664 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,869 | 1,259 | 12,183 | 3,718 | (96 | ) | 18,933 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
| | 52,246 | 11,340 | | 63,586 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
2,001 | | | | | 2,001 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
8,026 | 3,480 | | | (510 | ) | 10,996 | |||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | 60,032 | 2,175 | (259 | ) | 61,948 | |||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
16,032 | 22,883 | 124,461 | 17,233 | 8,519 | 189,128 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates |
11,767 | | 188 | 223 | 35 | 12,213 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates |
(10,780 | ) | | | | | (10,780 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other income |
1,502 | 102 | | | (838 | ) | 766 | |||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
(13,201 | ) | (22,139 | ) | (35,301 | ) | (16,784 | ) | (8,914 | ) | (96,339 | ) | ||||||||||||
Less: Provision for income taxes |
| | 3 | | | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(13,201 | ) | (22,139 | ) | (35,304 | ) | (16,784 | ) | (8,914 | ) | (96,342 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| (867 | ) | | (500 | ) | | (1,367 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (13,201 | ) | (23,006 | ) | (35,304 | ) | (17,284 | ) | (8,914 | ) | (97,709 | ) | |||||||||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(43,697 | ) | (43,697 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
$ | 34,783 | (54,012 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets at September 30, 2009 |
$ | 160,476 | 346,773 | 4,882,385 | 496,774 | (466,961 | ) | 5,419,447 | ||||||||||||||||
40
Table of Contents
The table below sets forth the Companys segment information for the nine month
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
BankAtlantic | Unallocated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bancorp | Amounts | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BFC | Real Estate | Bluegreen | Bluegreen | Parent | and | Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | Activities | Operations | Resorts | Communities | BankAtlantic | Company | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of real estate, net of estimated uncollectibles |
$ | | 2,455 | 117,894 | 9,740 | | | | 130,089 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other resorts and communities operations revenue |
| | 49,263 | 1,283 | | | | 50,546 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other real estate revenues |
1,386 | 1,228 | 37,458 | | | | (51 | ) | 40,021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
| | | | 135,317 | 239 | 81,936 | 217,492 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Services non-interest income |
| | | | 81,563 | 826 | (1,390 | ) | 80,999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
1,386 | 3,683 | 204,615 | 11,023 | 216,880 | 1,065 | 80,495 | 519,147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of real estate |
| 2,175 | 22,646 | 19,559 | | | | 44,380 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of other resorts and communities
operations |
| | 35,930 | 2,526 | | | | 38,456 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
4,920 | 10,423 | | | 19,749 | 11,095 | 49,581 | 95,768 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
| | | | 98,680 | 5,038 | | 103,718 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
20,261 | 7,515 | 114,771 | 10,620 | | | 31,227 | 184,394 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | | | 172,992 | 7,938 | (1,497 | ) | 179,433 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
25,181 | 20,113 | 173,347 | 32,705 | 291,421 | 24,071 | 79,311 | 646,149 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on settlement of investment in
Woodbridges subsidiary |
(1,135 | ) | | | | | | | (1,135 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in (loss) earnings
from unconsolidated affiliates |
(38 | ) | | | | | 719 | 105 | 786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
4,569 | 808 | | | | | (3,242 | ) | 2,135 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
(20,399 | ) | (15,622 | ) | 31,268 | (21,682 | ) | (74,541 | ) | (22,287 | ) | (1,953 | ) | (125,216 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
(5,718 | ) | | | | 127 | | 396 | (5,195 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(14,681 | ) | (15,622 | ) | 31,268 | (21,682 | ) | (74,668 | ) | (22,287 | ) | (2,349 | ) | (120,021 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
| 2,465 | | | | | | 2,465 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (14,681 | ) | (13,157 | ) | 31,268 | (21,682 | ) | (74,668 | ) | (22,287 | ) | (2,349 | ) | (117,556 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(52,919 | ) | (52,919 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
$ | 50,570 | (64,637 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41
Table of Contents
BankAtlantic | Unallocated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Bancorp | Amounts | |||||||||||||||||||||||
BFC | Real Estate | Parent | and | Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | Activities | Operations | BankAtlantic | Company | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of real estate, net of estimated uncollectibles |
$ | | 3,285 | | | 39 | 3,324 | |||||||||||||||||
Other real estate revenues |
843 | 1,789 | | | (26 | ) | 2,606 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
| | 173,068 | 490 | 1,390 | 174,948 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial Services non-interest income |
| | 100,844 | (490 | ) | (1,123 | ) | 99,231 | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
843 | 5,074 | 273,912 | | 280 | 280,109 | ||||||||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of real estate |
4,153 | 20,106 | | | 9,399 | 33,658 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
4,641 | 3,965 | 49,736 | 11,950 | (308 | ) | 69,984 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
| | 131,721 | 19,636 | | 151,357 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
2,001 | | 9,124 | | (583 | ) | 10,542 | |||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
22,569 | 12,129 | | | (1,473 | ) | 33,225 | |||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | 183,688 | 5,740 | (872 | ) | 188,556 | |||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
33,364 | 36,200 | 374,269 | 37,326 | 6,163 | 487,322 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridges subsidiary |
26,985 | | | | 13,384 | 40,369 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates |
28,729 | | 289 | 341 | 104 | 29,463 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates |
(31,181 | ) | | | | | (31,181 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Impairment of investments |
(2,396 | ) | | | | | (2,396 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other income |
4,381 | 512 | | | (2,368 | ) | 2,525 | |||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
(6,003 | ) | (30,614 | ) | (100,068 | ) | (36,985 | ) | 5,237 | (168,433 | ) | |||||||||||||
Less: Provision for income taxes |
| | 3 | | | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(6,003 | ) | (30,614 | ) | (100,071 | ) | (36,985 | ) | 5,237 | (168,436 | ) | |||||||||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
| (1,532 | ) | | 3,701 | | 2,169 | |||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (6,003 | ) | (32,146 | ) | (100,071 | ) | (33,284 | ) | 5,237 | (166,267 | ) | ||||||||||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(88,943 | ) | (88,943 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
$ | 94,180 | (77,324 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
42
Table of Contents
20. Commitments, Contingencies and Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
BFC
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that
owns two commercial properties in Hillsborough County, Florida. At September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, the carrying amount of this investment was approximately $665,000 and $690,000,
respectively, which is included in investments in unconsolidated affiliates in the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. In connection with the purchase of the commercial
properties in November 2006, BFC and the unaffiliated member each guaranteed the payment of up to a
maximum of $5.0 million each for certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that
are not related to the financial performance of the assets. BFC and the unaffiliated member also
entered into a cross indemnification agreement which limits BFCs obligations under the guarantee
to acts of BFC and its affiliates.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 50% limited partner interest in a limited
partnership that has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owns an office building in
Tampa, Florida. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying amount of this
investment was approximately $306,000 and $319,000, respectively, which is included in investments
in unconsolidated affiliates in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. In
connection with the purchase of the office building by the limited liability company in June 2007,
BFC guaranteed the payment of certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are
not related to the financial performance of the asset up to a maximum of $15.0 million, or $25.0
million in the event of any petition or involuntary proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or
similar state insolvency laws or in the event of any transfer of interests not in accordance with
the loan documents. BFC and the unaffiliated members also entered into a cross indemnification
agreement which limits BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates.
No amounts are recorded in the Companys financial statements for the obligations associated
with the above guarantees based on the potential indemnification by unaffiliated members and the
limit of the specific obligations to non-financial matters.
Based on the current accounting guidance associated with the consolidation of variable
interest entities implemented on January 1, 2010, we are not classified as primary beneficiaries in
connection with the above mentioned BFC/CCC investments and do not consolidate these entities into
our financial statements. We do not have the power to direct the activities that can significantly
impact the performance of these entities.
Core
At each of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Core had outstanding surety bonds of
approximately $495,000, which were related primarily to its obligations to various governmental
entities to construct improvements in its various communities. It is estimated that approximately
$495,000 of work remains to complete these improvements and it is not currently anticipated that
any outstanding surety bonds will be drawn upon.
Woodbridge
Levitt and Sons, Woodbridges former wholly-owned homebuilding subsidiary, had approximately
$33.3 million of surety bonds related to its ongoing projects at
November 9, 2007, the date on
which Levitt and Sons and substantially all of its subsidiaries filed voluntary bankruptcy
petitions (the Chapter 11 Cases). In the event that these obligations are drawn and paid by the
surety, Woodbridge could be responsible for up to $7.6 million plus costs and expenses in
accordance with the surety indemnity agreements executed by Woodbridge. At September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, Woodbridge had $490,000 and $527,000, respectively, in surety bond accruals
related to certain bonds where management believes it to be probable that Woodbridge will be
required to reimburse the surety under applicable indemnity agreements. Woodbridge reimbursed the
surety approximately $85,000 and $122,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively, in accordance with the indemnity agreement for bond claims paid during the
period. No reimbursements were made in the three or nine month periods ended September 30, 2010. It
is unclear whether and to what extent the remaining outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons
will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be responsible for additional amounts beyond
the previous accrued amount. Woodbridge will not receive any repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery
of any amounts it may be required to pay. In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require
Woodbridge to post collateral against a portion of the surety bonds exposure in connection with
demands made by a municipality. While Woodbridge did not believe that
the municipality had the right
to demand payment under the bonds
43
Table of Contents
Based on
claims by the municipality on the bonds, the surety requested that
Woodbridge post a $4.0 million escrow deposit while the matter was
being litigated with the municipality and Woodbridge complied with that request. In August 2010,
Woodbridge was granted a motion for summary judgment terminating any obligations under the bonds.
Subsequent to the motion being granted, the municipality appealed the decision.
On February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court presiding over the Chapter 11 Cases entered an
order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors. That order also approved the settlement pursuant to the
settlement agreement that was entered into with the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors. No
appeal or rehearing of the Bankruptcy Courts order was filed by any party, and the settlement was
consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time payment was made in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the settlement agreement. Under cost method accounting, the cost of settlement and
the related $52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was determined as the settlement holdback
and remained as an accrual pursuant to the settlement agreement) was recognized into income in the
first quarter of 2009, resulting in a $40.4 million gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary.
Pursuant to the settlement agreement, we agreed to share a percentage of any tax refund
attributable to periods prior to the bankruptcy with the Debtors Estate. In the fourth quarter of
2009, we accrued approximately $10.7 million in connection with the portion of the tax refund which
may be payable to the Debtors Estate pursuant to the settlement agreement. As a result, the gain on
settlement of investment in subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2009 was reduced to $29.7
million. Additionally, in the second quarter of 2010, we increased the $10.7 million accrual by
approximately $1.1 million, representing a portion of an additional tax refund which we expect to
receive due to a recent change in Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidance that will likely be
required to be paid to the Debtors Estate pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. We have placed into
escrow approximately $8.4 million, which represents the portion of the tax refund received to date
from the Internal Revenue Service that is payable to the Debtors Estate. At September 30, 2010,
this amount is included as restricted cash in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial
Condition.
As previously disclosed, under Florida law, holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock who
did not vote to approve the merger between Woodbridge and BFC and properly asserted and exercised
their appraisal rights with respect to their shares (Dissenting Holders) are entitled to receive
a cash payment in an amount equal to the fair value of their shares as determined in accordance
with the provisions of Florida law in lieu of the shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock that they
would otherwise have been entitled to receive. Dissenting Holders, who collectively held
approximately 4.2 million shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, have rejected Woodbridges
offer of $1.10 per share and requested payment for their shares based on their respective fair
value estimates of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock.
Litigation with respect to the appraisal process is currently ongoing. In December 2009, a $4.6 million
liability was recorded with a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in capital, which is
reflected in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition representing in the
aggregate Woodbridges offer to the Dissenting Holders. However, outcome of the appraisal rights litigation is uncertain. There is no assurance as to the amount of cash
that we will be required to pay to the Dissenting Holders, and such amount may be greater than the
$4.6 million that we have accrued.
Bluegreen
Tennessee Tax Audit
In 2005, the State of Tennessee Audit Division (the Division) audited certain subsidiaries
within Bluegreen Resorts for the period from December 1, 2001 through December 31, 2004. On
September 23, 2006, the Division issued a notice of assessment for approximately $652,000 of
accommodations tax based on the use of Bluegreen Vacation Club accommodations by Bluegreen Vacation
Club members who became members through the purchase of non-Tennessee property. Bluegreen believes
the attempt to impose such a tax is contrary to Tennessee law and has vigorously opposed, and
intends to continue to vigorously oppose, such assessment by the Division. An informal conference
was held in December 2007 to discuss this matter with representatives of the Division. No formal
resolution of the issue was reached during the conference and no further action has to date been
initiated by the State of Tennessee. While the timeshare industry has been successful in
challenging the imposition of sales taxes on the use of accommodations by timeshare owners, there
is no assurance that Bluegreen will be successful in contesting the current assessment.
44
Table of Contents
Pennsylvania Attorney General Lawsuit
On October 28, 2008, in Cause No. 479 M.D. 2008, styled Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Acting by Attorney General Thomas W. Corbett, Jr. v. Bluegreen Corporation, Bluegreen Resorts,
Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. and Great Vacation Destinations, Inc., in the Commonwealth
Court of Pennsylvania, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania acting through its Attorney General filed a
lawsuit against Bluegreen Corporation, Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. and
Great Vacation Destinations, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Bluegreen Corporation) alleging
violations of Pennsylvanias Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Laws. The lawsuit
alleged that Bluegreen used sales and marketing methods or practices that were unlawful under
Pennsylvania law and sought a permanent injunction preventing Bluegreen from using such methods and
practices in the future. The lawsuit also sought civil penalties and restitution on behalf of
Pennsylvania consumers. The lawsuit did not seek to permanently restrain Bluegreen or any of its
affiliates from doing business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The parties reached a
settlement on this matter and a consent was signed which received Court approval on May 26, 2010.
Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, Bluegreen paid $200,000 to the Attorney Generals Office
and agreed to a 30-day trial period within which additional consumers meeting certain eligibility
requirements can apply for relief. Bluegreen and the Attorney Generals Office are working
together to determine the payments to be made to consumers who applied for relief during the 30-day
trial period. Bluegreen does not expect this amount will be material.
Destin, Florida Deposit Dispute Lawsuit
In Cause No. 2006-Ca-3374, styled Joseph M. Scheyd, Jr., P.A. vs. Bluegreen Vacations
Unlimited, Inc.,; Hubert A. Laird; and MSB of Destin, Inc., in the Circuit Court of the First
Judicial Circuit in and for Okaloosa County, Florida, the Plaintiff as escrow agent brought an
interpleader action seeking a determination as to whether Bluegreen, as purchaser, or Hubert A.
Laird and MSB of Destin, Inc. as seller, were entitled to the $1.4 million escrow deposit being
maintained with the escrow agent pursuant to a purchase and sale contract for real property located
in Destin, Florida. Both Bluegreen and the seller have brought cross-claims for breach of the
underlying purchase and sale contract. The seller alleges Bluegreen failed to perform under the
terms of the purchase and sale contract and claims entitlement to the amount in escrow. Bluegreen
maintains that its decision not to close on the purchase of the property was proper under the terms
of the purchase and sale contract and therefore Bluegreen is entitled to a return of the full
escrow deposit. The seller amended its complaint to include a fraud count. Bluegreen believes the
fraud allegations are without merit and intends to vigorously defend this claim.
Other Matters
In addition to the matters disclose above, from time to time in the ordinary course of
business Bluegreen receives individual consumer complaints, as well as complaints received through
regulatory and consumer agencies, including Offices of State Attorney Generals. Bluegreen takes
these matters seriously and attempts to resolve any such issues as they arise. Bluegreens goal is
to cooperate fully with regulatory and consumer agencies with respect to any inquiries they
receive.
Mountain Lakes Mineral Rights
Bluegreen Southwest One, L.P., (Southwest), a subsidiary of Bluegreen Corporation, is the
developer of the Mountain Lakes subdivision in Texas. In Cause No. 28006, styled Betty Yvon
Lesley et a1 v. Bluff Dale Development Corporation, Bluegreen Southwest One. L.P. et al., in
the 266th Judicial District Court, Erath County, Texas, the plaintiffs filed a declaratory judgment
action against Southwest seeking to develop their reserved mineral interests in, on and under the
Mountain Lakes subdivision. The plaintiffs claims are based on property law, oil and gas law,
contract and tort theories. The property owners association and some of the individual landowners
have filed cross actions against Bluegreen, Southwest and individual directors of the property
owners association related to the mineral rights and certain amenities in the subdivision as
described below. On January 17, 2007, the court ruled that the restrictions placed on the
development that prohibited oil and gas production and development were invalid and not enforceable
as a matter of law, that such restrictions did not prohibit the development of the plaintiffs
prior reserved mineral interests and that Southwest breached its duty to lease the minerals to
third parties for development. The court further ruled that Southwest was the sole holder of the
right to lease the minerals to third parties. The order granting the plaintiffs motion was
severed into a new cause styled Cause No. 28769 Betty Yvon Lesley et a1 v. Bluff Dale
Development Corporation, Bluegreen Southwest One. L.P. et al. in the 266th Judicial District
Court, Erath County, Texas. Southwest appealed the trial courts ruling. On January 22, 2009, in
Bluegreen Southwest One, L.P. et al. v. Betty Yvon Lesley et al., in the 11th Court of
Appeals, Eastland, Texas, the
45
Table of Contents
Appellate Court reversed the trial courts decision and ruled in Southwests favor and
determined that all executive rights were owned by Southwest and then transferred to the individual
property owners in connection with the sales of land. All property owner claims were decided in
favor of Southwest. It was also decided that Southwest did not breach a fiduciary duty to the
plaintiffs as an executive rights holder. On May 14, 2009, the plaintiffs filed an appeal with the
Texas Supreme Court asking the Court to reverse the Appellate Courts decision in favor of
Bluegreen. On September 15, 2010 the Court heard oral arguments on whether to reverse or affirm
the Appellate Courts decision. No information is available as to when the Texas Supreme Court will
render a decision on the appeal.
Separately, one of the amenity lakes in the Mountain Lakes development did not reach the
expected water level after construction was completed. Owners of homesites within the Mountain
Lakes subdivision and the property owners Association of Mountain Lakes have asserted cross claims
against Southwest and Bluegreen regarding such failure as part of the Lesley litigation described
above as well as in Cause No. 067-223662-07, Property Owners Association of Mountain Lakes
Ranch, Inc. v. Bluegreen Southwest One, L.P. et al., in the 67th Judicial District
Court of Tarrant County, Texas. This case has been settled and the entire $3.4 million settlement
was paid in March of 2010. Additional claims may be pursued in the future by certain individual
lot owners within the Mountain Lakes subdivision in connection with these matters, but it is not
possible at this time to estimate the likelihood of loss or amount of potential exposure with
respect to any such matters, including the likelihood that any such loss may exceed the amount
accrued.
Catawba Falls Preserve Homeowners Association Demand Letter
On March 27, 2010, a settlement agreement was executed in connection with the Catawba Falls
Preserve Homeowners Association Inc. demand letter, wherein Bluegreen agreed to pay the Association
a nominal sum and convey to the Association title to two lots located within the Catawba Falls
Preserve subdivision.
Marshall, et al. Lawsuit Regarding Community Amenities
On September 14, 2009, in Cause No. 09-09-08763-CV, styled William Marshall and Patricia
Marshall, et al. v Bluegreen Southwest One, L.P., Bluegreen Southwest Land, Inc., Bluegreen
Corporation, Stephen Davis, and Bluegreen Communities of Texas, L.P., Plaintiffs filed this
action alleging fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, and negligence with regards
to the Ridgelake Shores subdivision, developed in Montgomery County, Texas, specifically, the
usability of the lakes within the community for fishing and sporting and the general level of
quality at the community. The lawsuit seeks material damages and the payment of costs to remediate
the lake. On September 10, 2010, a tentative settlement of this matter was reached, pursuant to
which Bluegreen agreed to pay $320,000 to provide for improvements to the fish habitat and general
usability of the lake environment. The settlement agreement remains subject to certain conditions,
including court approval.
Schawrz, et al. Lawsuit Regarding Community Amenities
On September 18, 2008, in Cause No. 2008-5U-CV-1358-WI, styled Paul A. Schwarz and Barbara
S. Schwarz v. Bluegreen Communities of Georgia, LLC and Bluegreen Corporation, Plaintiffs
brought suit alleging fraud and misrepresentation with regards to the construction of a marina at
the Sanctuary Cove subdivision located in Camden County, Georgia. Plaintiff subsequently withdrew
the fraud and misrepresentation counts and filed a count alleging violation of racketeering laws,
including mail fraud and wire fraud. On January 25, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a second complaint
seeking approval to proceed with the lawsuit as a class action on behalf of more than 100 persons
claimed to have been harmed by the alleged activities in a similar manner. Bluegreen has filed a
response with the Court in opposition to class certification. No decision has yet been made by the
Court as to whether they will certify a class. Bluegreen denies the allegations and intends to
vigorously defend the lawsuit.
Community Cable Service, LLC Lawsuit
On June 3, 2010, in a case captioned Community Cable Service, LLC v. Bluegreen Communities
of Georgia, LLC and Sanctuary Cove at St. Andrews Sound Community Association, Inc., a/k/a
Sanctuary Cove Home Developers Association, Inc., Case No. 16-2009-CA-008028, in the Circuit
Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit in and for Duval County, Florida, the plaintiffs filed suit
alleging breach by the Bluegreen Communities of Georgia and the community association of a bulk
cable TV services contract at Bluegreens Sanctuary Cove single family residential community being
developed in Waverly, Georgia. In its Complaint, the Plaintiffs alleged that approximately
$170,000 in unpaid bulk cable fees is due from the defendants, and the non-payment of fees will
continue to accrue on a monthly basis. Bluegreen and the community association allege incomplete
performance under the contract by plaintiffs and that the cable system installed was inferior and
did not comply with the
46
Table of Contents
requirements of the contract. The case went to mediation on September 20, 2010 but no resolution
was reached. Bluegreen intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.
BankAtlantic Bancorp
Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk were (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Commitments to sell fixed rate residential loans |
$ | 22,408 | 23,255 | |||||
Commitments to originate loans held for sale |
19,569 | 18,708 | ||||||
Commitments to originate loans held to maturity |
21,632 | 43,842 | ||||||
Commitments to purchase residential loans |
8,100 | | ||||||
Commitments to extend credit, including the
undisbursed
portion of loans in process |
372,724 | 396,627 | ||||||
Standby letters of credit |
8,818 | 13,573 | ||||||
Commercial lines of credit |
67,428 | 74,841 |
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by BankAtlantic to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. BankAtlantics standby letters of credit are generally
issued to customers in the construction industry guaranteeing project performance. These types of
standby letters of credit had a maximum exposure of $7.2 million at September 30, 2010.
BankAtlantic also issues standby letters of credit to commercial lending customers guaranteeing the
payment of goods and services. These types of standby letters of credit had a maximum exposure of
$1.6 million at September 30, 2010. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and
private borrowing arrangements and have maturities of one year or less. The credit risk involved
in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities
to customers. BankAtlantic may hold certificates of deposit and residential and commercial liens as
collateral for such commitments. Included in other liabilities at September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009 were $4,000 and $5,000, respectively, of unearned guarantee fees. There were no
obligations associated with these guarantees recorded in the financial statements.
Management of BankAtlantic Bancorp, based on discussions with legal counsel, has accrued $1.0
million for legal liabilities and believes its results of operations or financial condition will
not be materially impacted by the resolution of these matters. However, there is no assurance that
BankAtlantic Bancorp will not incur losses in excess of reserved amounts or in amounts that will be
material to its results of operations or financial condition.
Concentration of Credit Risk
BankAtlantic has a high concentration of its consumer home equity and commercial loans in the
State of Florida. Real estate values and general economic conditions have significantly
deteriorated since the origination dates of these loans. If market conditions in Florida do not
improve or deteriorate further, BankAtlantic may be exposed to significant credit losses in these
loan portfolios.
BankAtlantic purchases residential loans located throughout the country. The majority of
these residential loans are jumbo residential loans. A jumbo loan has a principal amount above the
industry-standard definition of conventional conforming loan limits. These loans could potentially
have outstanding loan balances significantly higher than related collateral values in distressed
areas of the country as a result of the decline in real estate values in residential housing
markets. Also included in this purchased residential loan portfolio are interest-only loans. The
structure of these loans results in possible increases in a borrowers loan payments when the
contractually required repayments change due to interest rate movement and the required
amortization of the principal amount. These payment increases could affect a borrowers ability to
meet the debt service on or repay the loan and lead to increased defaults and losses. At September
30, 2010, BankAtlantics residential loan portfolio included $600 million of interest-only loans,
which represents 48.7% of the residential loan portfolio, with 26.1% of the aggregate principal
amount of these interest-only loans secured by collateral located in California. Interest-only
residential loans scheduled to become fully amortizing during the three months ended December 31,
2010 and during the year ended December 31, 2011 are $2.1 million and $51.0 million, respectively.
If market conditions in the areas where the collateral for BankAtlantics residential loans are
located do not improve or deteriorate further, BankAtlantic may be exposed to additional losses in
this portfolio.
47
Table of Contents
21. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
BFC is the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen. Woodbridge Holdings
Corporation became a wholly owned subsidiary of BFC upon consummation of the merger between
Woodbridge and BFC on September 21, 2009. Prior to the merger, BFC held an approximately 59% voting
interest in Woodbridge. BFC also has a direct non-controlling interest in Benihana. Shares of BFCs
Class A and Class B common stock representing a majority of BFCs total voting power are owned or
controlled by the Companys Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Alan B. Levan, and by
the Companys Vice Chairman, John E. Abdo, both of whom are also directors of Bluegreen and
Benihana, and executive officers and directors of BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic.
The
following table presents related party transactions between BFC,
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Woodbridges 2009 amounts are included
in the amounts set forth for BFC. Amounts related to BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic and
services provided to Bluegreen after we acquired a controlling interest in Bluegreen (in November
2009) were eliminated in consolidation (in thousands).
BankAtlantic | ||||||||||||||||
BFC | Bancorp | Bluegreen | ||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Shared service income (expense) |
(a | ) | $ | 617 | (524 | ) | (93 | ) | ||||||||
Facilities cost and information technology |
(b | ) | $ | (145 | ) | 129 | 16 | |||||||||
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Shared service income (expense) |
(a | ) | $ | 544 | (406 | ) | (138 | ) | ||||||||
Facilities cost and information technology |
(b | ) | $ | (138 | ) | 127 | 11 | |||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Shared service income (expense) |
(a | ) | $ | 1,886 | (1,566 | ) | (320 | ) | ||||||||
Facilities cost and information technology |
(b | ) | $ | (425 | ) | 382 | 43 | |||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Shared service income (expense) |
(a | ) | $ | 1,723 | (1,312 | ) | (411 | ) | ||||||||
Facilities cost and information technology |
(b | ) | $ | (395 | ) | 353 | 42 |
(a) | Pursuant to the terms of shared service agreements between BFC and BankAtlantic Bancorp, subsidiaries of BFC provide human resources, risk management, investor relations, executive office administration and other services to BankAtlantic Bancorp. Additionally, BFC provides certain risk management and administrative services to Bluegreen. The costs of shared services are allocated based upon the usage of the respective services. | |
(b) | As part of the shared service arrangement, BFC pays BankAtlantic and Bluegreen for office facilities cost relating to BFC and its shared service operations. BFC also pays BankAtlantic for information technology related services pursuant to a separate agreement. For information technology related services, BFC paid BankAtlantic approximately $45,000 during each of the three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and $135,000 and $115,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had cash and cash equivalents
accounts at BankAtlantic with balances of approximately $4.4 million and $20.9 million,
respectively. These accounts were on the same general terms as deposits made by unaffiliated third
parties. Additionally, during 2009, the Company invested funds through the Certificate of Deposit
Account Registry Service (CDARS) program at BankAtlantic, which facilitates the placement of
funds into certificates of deposits issued by other financial institutions in increments of less
than the standard FDIC insurance maximum to insure that both principal and interest are eligible
for full FDIC insurance coverage. At December 31, 2009, the Company had $7.7 million invested
through the CDARS program at BankAtlantic. The Company did not have any funds invested through the
CDARS program at BankAtlantic at September 30, 2010. The aggregate interest income recognized by
the Company in connection with these funds held at BankAtlantic was approximately $4,000 and $6,000
for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $5,000 and $34,000 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
48
Table of Contents
In June 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic entered into a real estate advisory
service agreement with BFC for assistance relating to the work-out of loans and the sale of real
estate owned. BFC will receive a monthly fee of $12,500 from each of BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic
Bancorp Parent Company and if BFCs efforts result in net recoveries of any nonperforming loan or
the sale of real estate owned, BFC will receive a fee equal to 1% of the net value recovered.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, BFC recognized $110,000 and $335,000,
respectively, of real estate advisory service fees under this agreement.
On June 28, 2010, BFC loaned approximately $8.0 million to BankAtlantic Bancorp, and
BankAtlantic Bancorp executed a promissory note agreement in favor of BFC with a maturity date of
July 30, 2010. The note provided for payment either in cash or shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps
Class A Common Stock, depending on the results of BankAtlantic Bancorps Rights Offering and the
number of shares allocable to BFC pursuant to its exercise of its subscription rights in the Rights
Offering. In July 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp satisfied the promissory note in full through the
issuance of 5,302,816 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock to BFC. These shares
were in addition to the 4,697,184 shares previously issued to BFC in the Rights Offering.
The Company leases office space to Pizza Fusion for approximately $68,000 annually pursuant to
a month-to-month lease which commenced in September 2008. During the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009, Pizza Fusion paid approximately $48,000 and $51,000, respectively, under this
lease agreement.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we were reimbursed approximately
$2.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, from Bluegreen for various advisory services and
certain expenses incurred in assisting Bluegreen in its efforts to explore potential additional
sources of liquidity.
During December 2009, BFCs wholly owned subsidiary, Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC, was
engaged by Benihana to provide certain management, financial advisory and other consulting
services. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the consulting fees payable to Snapper
Creek Equity Management under this arrangement were approximately $350,000. In 2010, Benihana
engaged Risk Management Services (RMS), a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC, to provide insurance
and risk management services. Fees owed to RMS under this arrangement were approximately $45,000
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
In prior periods, BankAtlantic Bancorp issued options to purchase shares of its Class A common
stock to employees of Woodbridge prior to the 2004 spin-off of Woodbridge to BankAtlantic Bancorps
shareholders. Additionally, certain employees of BankAtlantic Bancorp have transferred to
affiliate companies and BankAtlantic Bancorp has elected, in accordance with the terms of
BankAtlantic Bancorps stock option plans, not to cancel the stock options held by those former
employees. BankAtlantic Bancorp accounts for these options to former employees as employee stock
options because these individuals were employees of BankAtlantic Bancorp on the grant date.
Outstanding options to purchase BankAtlantic Bancorp stock held by former employees consisted
of the following as of September 30, 2010:
Class A | Weighted | |||||||
Common | Average | |||||||
Stock | Price | |||||||
Options outstanding |
44,176 | $ | 52.38 |
During 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp issued to BFC employees that performed services for
BankAtlantic Bancorp options to acquire 9,800 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A common stock
at an exercise price of $46.90. These options vest in five years and expire ten years from the
grant date. BankAtlantic recorded $12,000 and $37,000 of service provider expenses relating to
these options for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Certain of the Companys affiliates, including its executive officers, have independently made
investments with their own funds in both public and private entities that the Company sponsored in
2001 and in which it holds investments.
Florida Partners Corporation owns 133,314 shares of the Companys Class B Common Stock and
1,270,294 shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock. Alan B. Levan may be deemed to be the
controlling shareholder of Florida Partners Corporation, and is also a member of its Board of
Directors.
49
Table of Contents
22. Loss Per Common Share
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted loss per common share
attributable to the Company (in thousands, except for per share data):
For the Three Months Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Basic (loss) earnings per common share |
||||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
$ | (38,861 | ) | (96,342 | ) | (120,021 | ) | (168,436 | ) | |||||||
Less: Noncontrolling interests loss
from continuing operations |
(11,239 | ) | (43,193 | ) | (52,919 | ) | (90,874 | ) | ||||||||
Loss attributable to BFC |
(27,622 | ) | (53,149 | ) | (67,102 | ) | (77,562 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | (563 | ) | (563 | ) | ||||||||
Loss allocable to common stock |
(27,810 | ) | (53,337 | ) | (67,665 | ) | (78,125 | ) | ||||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
| (1,367 | ) | 2,465 | 2,169 | |||||||||||
Less: Noncontrolling interests (loss) income
from discontinued operations |
| (504 | ) | | 1,931 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations attributable to BFC |
| (863 | ) | 2,465 | 238 | |||||||||||
Net loss allocable to common shareholders |
$ | (27,810 | ) | (54,200 | ) | (65,200 | ) | (77,887 | ) | |||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic weighted average number
of common shares outstanding |
75,381 | 49,509 | 75,379 | 46,599 | ||||||||||||
Basic (loss) earnings per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.37 | ) | (1.08 | ) | (0.90 | ) | (1.68 | ) | |||||||
Earnings (loss) per share
from discontinued operations |
| (0.01 | ) | 0.03 | 0.01 | |||||||||||
Basic loss per share |
$ | (0.37 | ) | (1.09 | ) | (0.87 | ) | (1.67 | ) | |||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (27,810 | ) | (53,337 | ) | (67,665 | ) | (78,125 | ) | |||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
allocable to common stock |
| (863 | ) | 2,465 | 238 | |||||||||||
Net loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (27,810 | ) | (54,200 | ) | (65,200 | ) | (77,887 | ) | |||||||
Denominator |
||||||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average number
of common shares outstanding |
75,381 | 49,509 | 75,379 | 46,599 | ||||||||||||
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
||||||||||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.37 | ) | (1.08 | ) | (0.90 | ) | (1.68 | ) | |||||||
Earnings (loss) per share
from discontinued operations |
| (0.01 | ) | 0.03 | 0.01 | |||||||||||
Diluted loss per share |
$ | (0.37 | ) | (1.09 | ) | (0.87 | ) | (1.67 | ) | |||||||
During
each of the three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 and each of the nine
month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, options to acquire 2,494,779 shares of Class A
Common Stock and 2,530,983 shares of Class A Common Stock, respectively, were anti-dilutive and not
included in the calculation of diluted loss per share.
50
Table of Contents
23. Parent Company Financial Information
BFCs parent company accounting policies are generally the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies appearing in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. The Companys investments in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen
and the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries and venture partnerships are presented in the parent
company financial statements as if accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
BFCs parent company unaudited condensed statements of financial condition at September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, unaudited condensed statements of operations for the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and unaudited condensed statements of cash flows
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are shown below:
Parent Company Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 5,678 | 1,308 | |||||
Securities available for sale |
42,084 | 18,981 | ||||||
Investment in Woodbridge Holdings, LLC |
132,920 | 197,264 | ||||||
Investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. |
23,442 | 47,555 | ||||||
Investment in and advances in other subsidiaries |
1,955 | 2,218 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,771 | 1,279 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 207,850 | 268,605 | |||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Advances from wholly owned subsidiaries |
$ | 935 | 818 | |||||
Other liabilities |
11,633 | 11,699 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
12,568 | 12,517 | ||||||
Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock |
11,029 | 11,029 | ||||||
Shareholders equity |
184,253 | 245,059 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 207,850 | 268,605 | |||||
Parent Company Condensed Statements of Operations
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 393 | 280 | 1,198 | 896 | |||||||||||
Expenses |
2,206 | 2,669 | 6,752 | 6,704 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) before earnings (loss) from subsidiaries |
(1,813 | ) | (2,389 | ) | (5,554 | ) | (5,808 | ) | ||||||||
Equity loss from Woodbridge Holdings, LLC |
(14,118 | ) | (35,778 | ) | (22,667 | ) | (31,850 | ) | ||||||||
Equity loss from BankAtlantic Bancorp |
(11,489 | ) | (15,057 | ) | (38,522 | ) | (39,880 | ) | ||||||||
Equity (loss) earnings from other subsidiaries |
(202 | ) | 75 | (359 | ) | (24 | ) | |||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(27,622 | ) | (53,149 | ) | (67,102 | ) | (77,562 | ) | ||||||||
Income taxes |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(27,622 | ) | (53,149 | ) | (67,102 | ) | (77,562 | ) | ||||||||
Equity earnings from subsidiaries
discontinued operations |
| (863 | ) | 2,465 | 238 | |||||||||||
Net loss |
(27,622 | ) | (54,012 | ) | (64,637 | ) | (77,324 | ) | ||||||||
5% Preferred Stock dividends |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | (563 | ) | (563 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (27,810 | ) | (54,200 | ) | (65,200 | ) | (77,887 | ) | |||||||
51
Table of Contents
Parent Company Statements of Cash Flow
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
For the Nine Months | ||||||||
Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
$ | (5,724 | ) | (5,110 | ) | |||
Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of securities available for sale |
(46,174 | ) | (1,508 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
2,498 | 400 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale |
24,246 | | ||||||
Distribution from subsidiaries |
45,085 | 30,084 | ||||||
Acquisition of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A shares |
(15,000 | ) | (29,888 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
10,655 | (912 | ) | |||||
Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock upon exercise of stock option |
2 | | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends paid |
(563 | ) | (563 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(561 | ) | (563 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
4,370 | (6,585 | ) | |||||
Cash at beginning of period |
1,308 | 9,218 | ||||||
Cash at end of period |
$ | 5,678 | 2,633 | |||||
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities |
||||||||
BFC and Woodbridge Merger related transactions: |
||||||||
Increase in BFCs Class A Common Stock |
$ | | 448 | |||||
Increase in additional paid-in capital |
| 99,135 | ||||||
Decrease in BFCs non-controlling interest in Woodbridge |
| (99,583 | ) | |||||
Net increase
in shareholders equity from the effect of subsidiaries capital transactions, net of income taxes |
1,772 | 7,818 | ||||||
Increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes |
2,951 | 10,919 | ||||||
BFCs prorata share of the cumulative effect of accounting changes
recognized by Bluegreen |
| 485 | ||||||
Net decrease in shareholders equity resulting from cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
(1,212 | ) | |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, BFC received $45 million of cash
dividends from Woodbridge. BFC did not receive cash dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp during the period. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, BFC received cash dividends of $30.8 million, which included
$30.0 million from Woodbridge and $84,000 from BankAtlantic Bancorp.
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, securities available for sale included
approximately $20.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of readily marketable securities, as
well as our investment in Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock of $21.4 million and $17.8 million
at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
24. Litigation
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in our legal proceedings from
those previously disclosed in Note 23 in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 and Note 24 in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2010 (see also Note 20 in this report for information relating to all of
Bluegreens material legal proceedings).
52
Table of Contents
In re BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 0:07-cv-61542-UU, United States
District Court, Southern District of Florida
On October 29, 2007, Joseph C. Hubbard filed a purported class action in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Florida against BankAtlantic Bancorp and four of its
current or former officers. The Defendants in this action are BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., James A.
White, Valerie C. Toalson, Jarett S. Levan, and Alan B. Levan. The Complaint, which was later
amended, alleges that during the purported class period of November 9, 2005 through October 25,
2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp and the named officers knowingly and/or recklessly made
misrepresentations of material fact regarding BankAtlantic and specifically BankAtlantics loan
portfolio and allowance for loan losses. The Complaint seeks to assert claims for violations of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and seeks unspecified
damages. On December 12, 2007, the Court consolidated into Hubbard a separately filed action
captioned Alarm Specialties, Inc. v. BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., No. 0:07cv-61623-WPD. On
February 5, 2008, the Court appointed State-Boston Retirement System lead plaintiff and Lubaton
Sucharow LLP to serve as lead counsel pursuant to the provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act. BankAtlantic Bancorp believes the claims to be without merit and intends to
vigorously defend the actions. A jury trial on these claims commenced on October 12, 2010 and the
jury is currently in deliberations. Plaintiffs are seeking damages with respect to shares that
were purchased during and held throughout the class period of $0.37 per share for a portion of the
class period and $2.93 per share for another portion of the class period. As the number of shares
for which any damage claim could be asserted is not determinable at this time, the amount of any
loss that might be incurred by BankAtlantic Bancorp if the claims are decided against BankAtlantic
Bancorp cannot be reasonably estimated.
Surety Bond Claim (Westchester Fire Insurance Company v. City of Brooksville)
This litigation arose from a dispute regarding liability under two performance bonds for
infrastructure issued in connection with a plat issued by the City of Brooksville for a single
family housing project that was not commenced. The project had been abandoned by Levitt and Sons
prior to its bankruptcy filing as non-viable as a consequence of the economic downturn and, in
connection with the Levitt and Sons bankruptcy, the mortgagee, Key Bank, was permitted by agreement
to initiate and conclude a foreclosure leading to the acquisition of the property by Key Banks
subsidiary. The City of Brooksville contended that, notwithstanding that the development had not
proceeded and was not likely to proceed at any known time in the future, it was entitled to recover
the face of the amount of the bonds in the approximate amount of $5.4 million. The company filed a
suit for declaratory judgment (in the name of its surety, Westchester) against the City of
Brooksville contending that the obligation under the bonds had terminated. In August 2010,
Woodbridge was granted a motion for summary judgment terminating any obligations under the bonds.
Subsequent to the motion being granted, the municipality appealed the decision.
National Bank of South Carolina v. Core Communities of South Carolina, LLC, et al., South Carolina
Court of Common Pleas, Fourteenth Judicial Circuit
On January 13, 2010, National Bank of South Carolina filed a complaint in the South Carolina
Court of Common Pleas, Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, to commence foreclosure proceedings related to
property at Tradition Hilton Head which served as collateral under a note and mortgage executed and
delivered by Core South Carolina, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Core, in favor of the lender. With Cores concurrence,
the property was subsequently placed under the control of a receiver appointed by the court. Core
is secondarily liable to the lender as a guarantor but was not a party to the action.
On September 1, 2010, Synovus Bank (successor by merger to National Bank of South Carolina)
commenced an action to enforce the guarantee executed by Core in connection with the loan
transactions between Core South Carolina, LLC and National
Bank of South Carolina. Through this action, Synovus Bank seeks to collect on approximately $25
million of indebtedness guaranteed by Core. On October 25, 2010, Core filed an answer and
affirmative defenses asserting, among other things, that the claim on the guarantee is not ripe
given the banks election to first foreclose against the underlying collateral. In addition, Core
has raised additional equitable defenses to the claim on the guarantee. Discovery in the case
has not yet commenced, and the trial date has been set. The amount of Cores liability, if any,
in this litigation has not been established.
53
Table of Contents
Investors Warranty of America, Inc. v. Core Communities of South Carolina, LLC and Core
Communities, LLC, et. al., Circuit Court, Jasper County, South Carolina, and
Investors Warranty of America, Inc. v. Core Communities, LLC and Horizons Acquisition 5, LLC,
Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for St. Lucie County, Florida
On September 8, 2010, Core and the other defendants entered into an agreement with the
Investors Warranty of America, among other parties, relating to foreclosure proceedings. Investors
Warranty of America previously commenced foreclosure proceedings on property located in Florida and
South Carolina which serves as collateral under loans which Core has defaulted on. Subsequently,
Investors Warranty of America assigned and conveyed its interests in both the Florida and South
Carolina loan facilities to PSL Acquisitions, LLC (PSLA). On November 8, 2010, Core and its
applicable subsidiaries, on the one hand, and PSLA, on the other hand, executed an agreement which,
upon the occurrence of certain events and subject to certain exceptions, provides for the
resolution of the disputes between them. Pursuant to the agreement, Core and its subsidiaries
agreed to, among other things, (i) pledge additional collateral to PSLA consisting of membership
interests in certain subsidiaries of Core, (ii) grant security interests in the acreage owned by
the subsidiaries in Port St. Lucie, Florida, substantially all of which is undeveloped raw land,
(iii) the amendment of the complaint related to the Florida foreclosure action to include this
additional collateral and (iv) the entry into consensual judgments of foreclosure in both
foreclosure actions. Core also agreed to cooperate with PSLA in connection with the enforcement
of its remedies against the collateral. PSLA has agreed, upon the occurrence of certain events and
subject to certain exceptions, not to enforce a deficiency judgment against Core and has released
Core from any other claims arising from or relating to the loans.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries are also parties to
proceedings or lawsuits as plaintiff or defendant involving its operations and activities. Although
the Company believes it has meritorious defenses in the pending legal actions and that the outcomes
of these pending legal matters should not materially impact us, the ultimate outcomes of these
matters are uncertain.
25. Restructuring Charges and Exit Activities
Restructuring charges and exit activities includes employee termination costs, lease contracts
executed for branch expansion and real estate acquired for branch expansion. The following table
provides information regarding liabilities associated with restructuring charges and exit
activities (in thousands):
Severance | ||||||||||||||||||||
Related and | Independent | Surety | ||||||||||||||||||
Benefits | Contract | Contractor | Bond | |||||||||||||||||
Liability | Liability | Agreements | Accrual | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
$ | 300 | 2,166 | 597 | 1,144 | 4,207 | ||||||||||||||
Expenses incurred |
2,106 | 1,666 | 43 | (49 | ) | 3,766 | ||||||||||||||
Cash payments |
(2,277 | ) | (384 | ) | (532 | ) | (122 | ) | (3,315 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
$ | 129 | 3,448 | 108 | 973 | 4,658 | ||||||||||||||
Severance | ||||||||||||||||||||
Related | ||||||||||||||||||||
and | Lease | Surety | ||||||||||||||||||
Benefits | Contract | Termination | Bond | |||||||||||||||||
Liability | Liability | Obligation | Accrual | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
$ | 1,124 | 3,925 | 1,720 | 527 | 7,296 | ||||||||||||||
Expenses incurred |
2,234 | 1,308 | (15 | ) | | 3,527 | ||||||||||||||
Amounts paid or amortized |
(1,994 | ) | (604 | ) | (777 | ) | (37 | ) | (3,412 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance at September 30,
2010 |
$ | 1,364 | 4,629 | 928 | 490 | 7,411 | ||||||||||||||
In March 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp reduced its workforce by approximately 130 associates, or
7%, impacting back-office functions as well as our community banking and commercial lending
business units. BankAtlantic Bancorp incurred $2.0 million of employee termination costs which
were included in the Companys consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
54
Table of Contents
In July 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp reduced its workforce by approximately 105 associates, or
7%, again impacting both back-office functions and community banking and commercial business
lending units. BankAtlantic Bancorp incurred $2.1 million of employee termination costs which are
included in the Companys consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
Beginning in December 2007, BankAtlantic terminated leases or sought to sublease properties
that it had previously leased for future branch expansion. These operating leases were fair valued
and are amortized to rent expense until the leases are terminated or subleased. BankAtlantic is
actively seeking tenants for potential sub-leases or unrelated third parties to assume the lease
obligations. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp
recognized $1.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively, of contract termination liabilities in
connection with operating leases executed for future branch expansion. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic recognized $1.5 million of additional impairments on real estate
acquired for branch expansion. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
BankAtlantic transferred a recently constructed $1.9 million branch facility to real estate held
for sale based on its decision to seek a buyer for the asset. BankAtlantic also transferred $1.3
million of land from real estate held for sale to property held for use as BankAtlantic suspended
efforts to seek a buyer due to adverse real estate market conditions in the area where the land was
located.
Lease termination obligation includes costs associated with non-cancelable property and
equipment leases that Bluegreen has ceased to use, as well as termination fees related to the
cancellation of certain contractual lease obligations at Bluegreen.
At September 30, 2010 Woodbridge had $490,000 in surety bond accruals related to certain bonds
where management believes it to be probable that Woodbridge will be required to reimburse the
surety under applicable indemnity agreements. Woodbridge reimbursed the surety approximately
$85,000 and $122,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, in
accordance with the indemnity agreement for bond claims paid during the period. No reimbursements
were made in the three or nine month periods ended September 30, 2010.
26. New Accounting Pronouncements
Beginning with the period ended March 31, 2010, new accounting guidance was implemented
requiring the following additional disclosure regarding fair value measurements: (1) transfers in
and out of Level 1 and 2 measurements and the reasons for the transfers, and (2) a presentation of
gross activity within the Level 3 roll forward. The guidance also included clarifications to
existing disclosure requirements on the level of disaggregation and disclosures regarding inputs
and valuation techniques. The guidance is applicable to all disclosures about recurring and
nonrecurring fair value measurements. The effective date of the guidance was the first interim or
annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the gross presentation of the
Level 3 roll forward information, which is required for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2010 and for interim reporting periods within those years. The additional disclosures
made in accordance with this new guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys financial
statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued new disclosure guidance about the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The new guidance provides enhanced disclosures
related to the credit quality of financing receivables, which includes the Companys loans
receivable and the allowance for credit losses, and provides that new and existing disclosures
should be disaggregated based on how an entity develops its allowance for credit losses and how it
manages credit exposures. Under the new guidance, additional disclosures required for loans
receivable include information regarding the aging of past due receivables, credit quality
indicators, and modifications of financing receivables. The new guidance is effective for periods
ending after December 15, 2010, with the exception of the amendments to the roll forward of the
allowance for credit losses and the disclosures about modifications which are effective for periods
beginning after December 15, 2010. Comparative disclosures are required only for periods ending
subsequent to initial adoption. The Company does not currently believe that the new guidance will
have a material effect on the Companys financial statements.
55
Table of Contents
27. Subsequent Event
In October 2010, the Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture acquired Paradise Point Resort, which
is located in close proximity to the existing Wilderness Club at Big Cedar in Ridgedale, Missouri.
The Paradise Point Resort acquisition consisted of land, completed residential units (consisting of
both condominium and timeshare units), the right to construct additional VOI units on the acquired
property, as well as a clubhouse and related recreational areas. The property was acquired with the
intent to expand the amount of completed VOI inventory available for sale by the Bluegreen/Big
Cedar Joint Venture as well as to develop and sell new VOI inventory in the future. In connection
with the acquisition, Bluegreen has assumed management of the property. The purchase price of
Paradise Point Resort was $7.7 million, of which $2.3 million was paid in cash and the balance of
$5.4 million was financed with a note payable to Foundation Capital Resources, Inc., a lender
affiliated with the seller. The acquisition will be accounted for as a purchase of a business.
Bluegreen is in the process of determining the fair values of the assets and the liabilities
acquired.
Additionally, in a separate transaction in October 2010, the Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture
acquired a 109-acre development parcel, located adjacent to the existing Wilderness Club at Big
Cedar, from an affiliate of Big Cedar, LLC. The parcel was acquired with the intent to develop
future VOI inventory for sale by the Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture. The purchase price of the
parcel was $10.0 million, of which $2.3 million was paid in cash and the balance of $7.7 million
was financed with a note payable to Foundation Capital Resources, Inc. Concurrent with the
acquisition of the 109-acre parcel, the expiration date of the exclusive marketing agreement
between Bluegreen and Bass Pro, Inc., an affiliate of Big Cedar, LLC, was extended from January of
2015 to January of 2025.
Both notes payable to Foundation Capital Resources, Inc. have maturities of five years (the
note underlying the 109-acre parcel purchase has a two-year extension provision subject to certain
conditions) and bear interest at a rate of 8% for three years, which then adjusts to the lower of
Prime plus 4.75% or the lender specified rate, not to exceed 9%. Repayments of the notes will be
based upon the release payments from future sales of VOIs located on the underlying properties,
subject to minimum payments stipulated in the agreements.
56
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Results of Operations
Overview
The objective of the following discussion is to provide an understanding of the financial
condition and results of operations of BFC Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. As of September 30, 2010, BFC had total assets
of approximately $6.0 billion, liabilities of approximately $5.7 billion and equity of
approximately $290.2 million, including noncontrolling interest
of approximately $106.0 million.
BFC Financial Corporation (BFC or, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise
requires, we, us, our or the Company) is a diversified holding company whose principal
holdings include a controlling interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries,
including BankAtlantic (BankAtlantic Bancorp), a controlling interest in Bluegreen Corporation
and its subsidiaries (Bluegreen), and a non-controlling interest in Benihana, Inc. (Benihana).
BFC also holds interests in other investments and subsidiaries, including Core Communities, LLC and
its subsidiaries (Core or Core Communities). As a result of its position as the controlling
shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC is a unitary savings bank holding company regulated by
the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).
Historically, BFCs business strategy has been to invest in and acquire businesses in diverse
industries either directly or through controlled subsidiaries. However, BFC believes that, in the
short term, the Companys and its shareholders interests are best served by BFC providing
strategic support to its existing investments. In furtherance of this strategy, the Company took
several steps in 2009 and 2010, including those described below, which it believes will enhance the
Companys prospects. During the third quarter of 2009, BFC and Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
consummated their merger pursuant to which Woodbridge became a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, our ownership interest in Bluegreen increased to 52% as a result
of the purchase of an additional 23% interest in Bluegreen. The acquisition of this control
position in Bluegreen resulted in a bargain purchase gain under generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) of approximately $183.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2009. We have also
increased our investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp through our participation in BankAtlantic
Bancorps rights offerings to its shareholders during the third quarter of 2009 and the second
quarter of 2010 (as described below), which in the aggregate increased our economic interest in
BankAtlantic Bancorp to 45% and our voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp to 71%. In addition, we
have taken actions to restructure Core in recognition of the continued depressed real estate market
and Cores inability to meet its obligations, as described further in Note 3 of the
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. In the future, we will consider other
opportunities that could alter our ownership in our affiliates or seek to make opportunistic
investments outside of our existing portfolio; however, we do not currently have pre-determined
parameters as to the industry or structure of any future investment. In furtherance of our goals,
we will continue to evaluate various financing transactions that may present themselves, including
raising additional debt or equity as well as other alternative sources of new capital.
During July 2010, Benihana announced its intention to engage in a formal review of strategic
alternatives, including a possible sale of the company. Benihana has since engaged an investment banker to assist it in pursuing a sale of the Company. BFC is supportive of Benihana in achieving
its objectives.
On June 18, 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp commenced a rights offering (the Rights Offering) to
its shareholders of record as of the close of business on June 14, 2010 (the Record Date). In
the Rights Offering, BankAtlantic Bancorp distributed to each eligible shareholder 0.327
subscription rights for each share of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock owned as of the close of business on the Record Date. Fractional subscription rights
were rounded up to the next largest whole number. Each subscription right entitled the holder
thereof to purchase one share of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock at the purchase price
of $1.50 per share. Shareholders who exercised their Basic Subscription Rights in full were also
given the opportunity to request to purchase any additional shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps
Class A Common Stock that remained unsubscribed for at the expiration of the Rights Offering at the
same $1.50 per share purchase price. The Rights Offering expired on July 20, 2010.
BFC acquired an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock
in the Rights Offering. BFC exercised its basic subscription rights to purchase 5,986,865 shares,
and the remaining 4,013,135 shares were acquired by BFC pursuant to its over-subscription request.
The purchase of these shares in
57
Table of Contents
the Rights Offering increased BFCs ownership interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by
approximately 8% to 45% and BFCs voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 5% to
71%.
As previously disclosed, on September 21, 2009, we consummated our merger with Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation pursuant to which Woodbridge Holdings Corporation merged with and into
Woodbridge Holdings, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary which continued as the surviving company of
the merger and the successor entity to Woodbridge Holdings Corporation. Pursuant to the terms of
the merger each outstanding share of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock (other than those held by
Dissenting Holders) automatically converted into the right to receive 3.47 shares of our Class A
Common Stock. Shares otherwise issuable to us attributable to the shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock owned by us were canceled in connection with the merger. As a
result of the merger, Woodbridge Holdings Corporations separate corporate existence ceased and its
Class A Common Stock is no longer publicly traded.
On November 16, 2009, an additional 7.4 million shares of the common stock of Bluegreen were
purchased for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $23 million, increasing our ownership
interest to approximately 16.9 million shares, or approximately 52%, of Bluegreens outstanding
common stock. Accordingly, we are deemed to have a controlling interest in Bluegreen and, under
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), Bluegreens results since November 16, 2009, the
date of the share purchase, are consolidated in BFCs financial statements. Prior to November 16,
2009, the investment in Bluegreens shares represented approximately 29% of Bluegreens common
stock and was accounted for using the equity method.
GAAP requires that BFC consolidate the financial results of the entities in which it has a
controlling interest. As a consequence, the assets and liabilities of all such entities are
presented on a consolidated basis in BFCs financial statements. However, except as otherwise
noted, the debts and obligations of the consolidated entities, including BankAtlantic Bancorp,
Bluegreen, Woodbridge and Core, are not direct obligations of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC.
Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC absent a dividend or distribution
from those entities, which may be limited or restricted. The recognition by BFC of income from
controlled entities is determined based on the total percent of economic ownership in those
entities. At September 30, 2010, we owned approximately 52% of Bluegreens common stock and had an approximately 45% ownership interest and 71% voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp.
On February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court presiding over the Levitt and Sons Chapter 11 Cases
entered an order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors. That order also approved the settlement pursuant to the
settlement agreement that was entered into with the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors. No
appeal or rehearing of the Bankruptcy Courts order was filed by any party, and the settlement was
consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time payment was made in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the settlement agreement. Under cost method accounting, the cost of settlement and
the related $52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was determined as the settlement holdback
and remained as an accrual pursuant to the settlement agreement) was recognized into income in the
first quarter of 2009, resulting in a $40.4 million gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary.
As discussed further in this report, recent tax law changes have resulted in the receipt of tax
refunds, and pursuant to the settlement agreement, we agreed to share a percentage of any tax
refund attributable to periods prior to the bankruptcy with the Debtors Estate. At September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, we have a liability of approximately $11.8 million and $10.7
million, respectively, in connection with the portion of the tax refund which may be payable to the
Debtors Estate pursuant to the settlement agreement. We have placed into escrow approximately $8.4
million, which represents the portion of the tax refund received to date from the Internal Revenue
Service that is payable to the Debtors Estate. At September 30, 2010, this amount is included as
restricted cash in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition.
In December 2009, Core Communities reinitiated efforts to sell two of its commercial leasing
projects (the Projects) and began soliciting bids from several potential buyers to purchase
assets associated with the Projects. Due to this decision, the assets associated with the
Projects were reclassified as assets held for sale and the liabilities related to these assets were
reclassified as liabilities related to assets held for sale in the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition. Additionally, the results of operations for the Projects are included in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations in discontinued operations for the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2009 and the nine month period ended September 30, 2010. On June
10, 2010, Core sold the Projects for approximately $75.4 million. As a result of the sale, a $2.6
million gain on sale of discontinued operations was
realized in the second quarter of 2010. See Note 5 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information.
58
Table of Contents
On January 1, 2010, BFC, Bluegreen and BankAtlantic Bancorp adopted an amendment to the
accounting guidance associated with the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIEs) and
the accounting guidance for transfers of financial assets. The adoption of these standards resulted
in Bluegreen consolidating seven of its special purpose finance entities and BankAtlantic Bancorp
consolidating its joint venture that conducts a factoring business. For further information, see
Note 2 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
As a result of the Woodbridge merger on September 21, 2009 and the Bluegreen share acquisition
on November 16, 2009, the Company reorganized its reportable segments to better align its segments
with the current operations of its businesses. The Companys business activities currently consist
of (i) Real Estate and Other Activities and (ii) Financial Services. The Company currently reports
the results of operations of its business activities through six reportable segments: BFC
Activities, Real Estate Operations, Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen Communities, and the two
reportable segments through which Financial Services activities are conducted, BankAtlantic and
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company. As a result of this reorganization, our BFC Activities segment
now includes activities formerly reported in the Woodbridge Other Operations segment, and our Real
Estate Operations segment is comprised of what was previously identified as the Land Division.
Bluegreens results of operations since November 16, 2009 are reported through the Bluegreen
Resorts and Bluegreen Communities segments. Prior to November 16, 2009, when we owned approximately
9.5 million shares of Bluegreens common stock, representing approximately 29% of such stock, the
investment in Bluegreen was accounted for using the equity method of accounting, and our interest
in Bluegreens earnings and losses was included in our BFC Activities segment. The Companys
Financial Services business activities include BankAtlantic Bancorps results of operations and are
reported in two segments: BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company.
Forward Looking Statements
Except for historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this
document contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. When used in
this document and in any documents incorporated by reference herein, the words anticipate,
believe, estimate, may, intend, expect and similar expressions identify certain of such
forward-looking statements. Actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially
from those contemplated, expressed, or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein.
These forward-looking statements are based largely on the expectations of the Company and are
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which
are, in many instances, beyond the Companys control. When considering those forward-looking
statements, the reader should keep in mind the risks, uncertainties and other cautionary statements
made in this report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
including those discussed in the Risk Factors section of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. The reader should not place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statement, which speaks only as of the date made. This document also contains
information regarding the past performance of our investments and the reader should note that prior
or current performance of investments and acquisitions is not a guarantee or indication of future
performance.
Some factors which may affect the accuracy of the forward-looking statements apply generally
to the financial services, real estate, resort development and vacation ownership, and restaurant
industries, while other factors apply directly to us. Risks and uncertainties associated with BFC,
including its wholly-owned Woodbridge Holdings subsidiary, include, but are not limited to:
| risks associated with the Companys current business strategy, including the risk that BFC will not be in a position to provide strategic support to its affiliated entities or that such support will not achieve the anticipated benefits and may negatively impact our cash flow; | ||
| BFCs shareholders interests may be diluted if additional shares of BFCs common stock are issued, and BFCs public company investments may be diluted if BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen or Benihana issue additional shares of its stock; | ||
| the risk that creditors of the Companys subsidiaries or other third parties may seek to recover distributions or dividends made by such subsidiaries or other amounts owed by such subsidiaries from their respective parent companies, including BFC; |
59
Table of Contents
| the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting the Company and its subsidiaries, and their operations, markets, products and services; | ||
| adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market and other capital markets and the impact of such conditions on the activities of the Company and its subsidiaries; | ||
| the impact of the current economic downturn on the price and liquidity of BFCs common stock and on BFCs ability to obtain additional capital, including the risk that if BFC needs or otherwise believes it is advisable to issue debt or equity securities to fund its operations, it may not be possible to issue any such securities on favorable terms, if at all; | ||
| the performance of entities in which the Company has made investments may not be profitable or their results as anticipated; | ||
| BFC is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries to fund its operations, and currently BankAtlantic Bancorp is prohibited from paying dividends and may not pay dividends in the future, whether as a result of such restrictions continuing in the future or otherwise, and Bluegreen has historically not paid dividends on its common stock, and even if paid, BFC has historically experienced and may continue to experience negative cash flow; | ||
| the uncertainty regarding the amount of cash that will be required to be paid to Woodbridge shareholders who exercised appraisal rights in connection with Woodbridges merger with BFC; | ||
| the risks related to the indebtedness of Woodbridge and its subsidiaries, including the risks relating to the indebtedness currently in default and the risk that negotiations and agreements relating to the resolution of the indebtedness and the release from the obligations under any or all of the debt may not be successful or complied with; | ||
| the risks relating to Cores liquidity, cash position and ability to continue operations, including the risk that Core could be obligated to make additional payments under its outstanding development bonds, or incur additional impairment charges and losses beyond those already incurred; | ||
| the risk that Cores lenders will foreclose on the property which serves as collateral for defaulted loans or take other remedial actions available to them, and Core could incur additional impairment charges and losses beyond those already incurred; | ||
| risks associated with the securities we hold directly or indirectly, including the risk that we may record further impairment charges with respect to such securities in the event trading prices decline in the future; | ||
| uncertainties associated with the accounting for the Bluegreen share acquisition, including the impact of changes in the estimates and analyses used to determine the revised evaluation of the inventory of Bluegreen as of the acquisition date and the effect, if any, on the amount of the $183.1 million bargain purchase gain recorded at December 31, 2009; | ||
| the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP involves making estimates, judgments and assumptions, and our financial condition and operating results may be materially impacted in the future if our estimates, judgments or assumptions prove to be incorrect; | ||
| risks relating to our investment in Benihana, including the risk that Benihana may not be successful in its efforts to sell Benihana, and the risk that any such sale may not have a favorable impact on our investment in Benihana or otherwise on our financial condition, cash position and operating results; | ||
| the risk that the amount of any tax refund that we may receive in the future may be less than expected, or received later than expected; | ||
| the risks related to litigation and other legal proceedings against BFC and its subsidiaries, including the costs and expenses of such proceedings, including legal and other professional fees, as well as the impact of any finding of liability or damages on our financial condition and operating results; and | ||
| the Companys success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing. |
With respect to BFCs subsidiary, BankAtlantic Bancorp, and its subsidiary, BankAtlantic, the
risks and uncertainties include:
| the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting BankAtlantic Bancorp and its operations, markets, products and services, including the impact of the changing regulatory environment, a continued or deepening recession, continued decreases in real estate values, and increased unemployment or sustained high unemployment rates on its business generally, BankAtlantics regulatory capital ratios, the ability of its borrowers to service their obligations and its customers to maintain account balances and the value of collateral securing its loans; | ||
| credit risks and loan losses, and the related sufficiency of the allowance for loan losses, including the impact on the credit quality of BankAtlantic Bancorp loans (including those held in the asset workout subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp) of a sustained downturn in the economy and in the real estate market and other changes in the real estate markets in BankAtlantic Bancorps trade area and where collateral is located; |
60
Table of Contents
| the quality of BankAtlantic Bancorps real estate based loans including its residential land acquisition and development loans (including Builder land bank loans, Land acquisition and development loans and Land acquisition, development and construction loans) as well as Commercial land loans, other Commercial real estate loans; and Residential loans and Consumer loans; and conditions specifically in those market sectors; | ||
| the quality of BankAtlantic Bancorps Commercial business loans and conditions specifically in that market sector; | ||
| the risks of additional charge-offs, impairments and required increases in BankAtlantic Bancorp allowance for loan losses especially if the economy and real estate markets in Florida do not improve; | ||
| additional regulatory requirements or restrictions on BankAtlantic Bancorps activities which impact BankAtlantic Bancorps business and prospects; | ||
| the uncertain impact of legal proceedings on BankAtlantic Bancorps financial condition or operations; | ||
| changes in interest rates and the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws including their impact on the banks net interest margin; | ||
| adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market and other financial and credit markets and the impact of such conditions on our activities, the value of our assets and on the ability of our borrowers to service their debt obligations and maintain account balances; | ||
| BankAtlantic Bancorp may not be able to sell its Tampa operations on acceptable terms or at all; | ||
| BankAtlantic Bancorp expense reduction initiatives may not be successful and additional cost savings may not be achieved; | ||
| BankAtlantic Bancorp may raise additional capital and such capital may be highly dilutive to BankAtlantic Bancorps shareholders or may not be available; | ||
| the impact of periodic valuation testing of goodwill, deferred tax assets and other assets; | ||
| past performance and perceived trends may not be indicative of future results; and | ||
| BankAtlantic Bancorp success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing. |
With respect to Bluegreen Corporation, the risks and uncertainties include, but are not
limited to:
| the overall state of the economy, interest rates and the availability of financing affect Bluegreens ability to market vacation ownership interests (VOIs) and residential homesites; | ||
| Bluegreen would incur substantial losses and its liquidity position could be adversely impacted if the customers it finances default on their obligations; | ||
| Bluegreens business plan historically has depended on its ability to sell or borrow against its notes receivable to support its liquidity and profitability; | ||
| while Bluegreen has attempted to restructure its business to reduce its need for and reliance on financing for liquidity in the short term, there is no assurance that such restructuring will be successful or that its business and profitability will not otherwise continue to depend on its ability to obtain financing, which may not be available on favorable terms, or at all; | ||
| Bluegreens results of operations and financial condition could in the past has been and be in the future continue to adversely impacted if its estimates concerning its notes receivable are incorrect. This may include additional impairment charges on loans generated prior to December 2008, when Bluegreen implemented stricter credit underwriting standards. In addition, Bluegreens new credit underwriting standards may not have the anticipated favorable impact on the performance of its receivables; | ||
| Bluegreens future success depends on its ability to market its products successfully and efficiently; | ||
| Bluegreen is subject to the risks of the real estate market and the risks associated with real estate development, including the decline in real estate values and the deterioration of real estate sales; | ||
| Bluegreens adoption on January 1, 2010, of the accounting guidance requiring the consolidation of its special purpose finance entities had a material adverse impact on its net worth, leverage, and book value per share, and could have an adverse impact on its profits in the future; | ||
| Bluegreens initiatives to increase the amount of cash received upon sales of VOIs and to achieve selling and marketing efficiencies in its Bluegreen Resorts segment may not be successful; | ||
| Bluegreen may not be successful in increasing or expanding its fee-based services relationships and its fee-based service activities may not be profitable, which may have an adverse impact on its results of operations and financial condition; | ||
| low consumer demand for homesites has had and may continue to have, an adverse impact on Bluegreens Communities segment; |
61
Table of Contents
| claims for development-related defects could adversely affect Bluegreens financial condition and operating results; | ||
| the resale market for VOIs could adversely affect Bluegreens business; | ||
| Bluegreen may be adversely affected by extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations and changes in applicable laws and regulations, including with respect to the imposition of additional taxes on operations. In addition, results of audits of Bluegreens tax returns or those of its subsidiaries may have a material and adverse impact on its financial condition; | ||
| environmental liabilities, including claims with respect to mold or hazardous or toxic substances, could have a material adverse impact on Bluegreens business; | ||
| the ratings of third-party rating agencies could adversely impact Bluegreens ability to obtain, renew, or extend credit facilities, debt, or otherwise raise capital; | ||
| in the near term, Bluegreen has significant debt maturing and advance periods expiring on its receivable-backed credit facilities, which could adversely impact its liquidity position, and, it may not be successful in refinancing or renewing the debt on favorable terms, if at all; | ||
| Bluegreens financial statements are prepared based on certain estimates, including those related to future cash flows which in turn are based upon expectations of its performance given current and projected forecasts of the economy and real estate markets in general. Bluegreens results and financial condition may be materially and adversely impacted if the adverse conditions in the real estate market continue for longer than expected or deteriorate further or if its performance does not otherwise meet its expectations; and | ||
| the loss of the services of Bluegreens key management and personnel could adversely affect its business. |
In addition to the risks and factors identified above, reference is also made to other risks
and factors detailed in reports filed by the Company, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen with the
SEC.
Critical Accounting Policies
Management views critical accounting policies as accounting policies that are important
to the understanding of our financial statements and also involve estimates and judgments about
inherently uncertain matters. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated statements of
financial condition and assumptions that affect the recognition of income and expenses on the
consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented. Actual results could differ
significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to
significant change in subsequent periods relate to the determination of the allowance for loan
losses, evaluation of goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment, the valuation of real
estate acquired in connection with foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, the valuation of real
estate held for development and sale and its impairment reserves, revenue and cost recognition on
percent complete projects, estimated costs to complete construction, the valuation of investments
in unconsolidated subsidiaries, the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities in the
application of the acquisition method of accounting, accounting for deferred tax asset valuation
allowance, accounting for uncertain tax positions, accounting for contingencies, and assumptions
used in the valuation of stock based compensation. The accounting policies that we have identified
as critical accounting policies are: (i) allowance for loan losses and notes receivables; (ii)
impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets; (iii) valuation of securities as well as the
determination of other-than-temporary declines in value; (iv) accounting for business
combinations, including the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities in the
application of the acquisition method of accounting; (v) the valuation of real estate; (vi)
revenue and cost recognition on percentage of completion; (vii) estimated cost to complete
construction; (viii) the valuation of equity method investments; (ix) accounting for deferred tax
asset valuation allowance; and (x) accounting for contingencies. For a more detailed discussion of
these critical accounting policies see Critical Accounting Policies appearing in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 26 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included under
Item 1 of this report for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements applicable to the Company
and its subsidiaries.
62
Table of Contents
Summary of Consolidated Results of Operations
The table below sets forth the Companys summarized results of operations (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations: | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Real Estate and Other |
$ | (13,677 | ) | (44,254 | ) | (23,066 | ) | (31,380 | ) | |||||||
Financial Services |
(25,184 | ) | (52,088 | ) | (96,955 | ) | (137,056 | ) | ||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(38,861 | ) | (96,342 | ) | (120,021 | ) | (168,436 | ) | ||||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
| (1,367 | ) | 2,465 | 2,169 | |||||||||||
Net loss |
(38,861 | ) | (97,709 | ) | (117,556 | ) | (166,267 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Net loss attributable
to noncontrolling interests |
(11,239 | ) | (43,697 | ) | (52,919 | ) | (88,943 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
(27,622 | ) | (54,012 | ) | (64,637 | ) | (77,324 | ) | ||||||||
5% Preferred stock dividends |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | (563 | ) | (563 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (27,810 | ) | (54,200 | ) | (65,200 | ) | (77,887 | ) | |||||||
Consolidated net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $27.6
million and $64.6 million, respectively, compared with a net loss of $54 million and $77.3 million,
respectively, for the same periods in 2009. The results from discontinued operations relate to Ryan
Beck (for all periods) and Core Communities commercial leasing projects (for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and the nine months ended September 30, 2010), as discussed further
in Note 5 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
The 5% Preferred Stock dividend represents the dividends paid by the Company on its 5%
Cumulative Preferred Stock.
The results of our business segments and other information on each segment are discussed below
in BFC Activities, Real Estate Operations, Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen Communities, BankAtlantic
and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company.
63
Table of Contents
Consolidated Financial Condition
Total assets at each of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $6.0 billion. On January 1,
2010, BFC, Bluegreen and BankAtlantic Bancorp adopted an amendment to the accounting guidance for
transfers of financial assets and an amendment to the accounting guidance associated with the
consolidation of VIEs. As a result of the adoption of these accounting standards, Bluegreen
consolidated seven existing special purpose finance entities associated with prior securitization
transactions that previously qualified for off-balance sheet sales treatment, and BankAtlantic
Bancorp consolidated its joint venture that conducts a factoring business. Accordingly, Bluegreens
consolidated special purpose finance entities and BankAtlantic Bancorps consolidated factoring
joint venture are now consolidated in BFCs financial statements. The consolidation of Bluegreens
special purpose finance entities resulted in a one-time non-cash after-tax reduction to retained
earnings of $2.1 million and the following impacts to the Companys Consolidated Statement of
Financial Condition at January 1, 2010: (1) assets increased by $414.1 million, primarily
representing the consolidation of notes receivable, net of allowance, partially offset by the
elimination of Bluegreens retained interests; (2) liabilities increased by $416.2 million,
primarily representing the consolidation of non-recourse debt obligations associated with third
parties, partially offset by the elimination of certain deferred tax liabilities; and (3) total
equity decreased by approximately $2.0 million, including a decrease of approximately $811,000 to
noncontrolling interests (see Note 2 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
for further information). No charges were recorded in connection with consolidation of BankAtlantic
Bancorps factoring joint venture. Other than such increases and decreases, the changes in
components of total assets from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010 were primarily comprised
of:
| Increase in cash and cash equivalents primarily reflecting a $58.5 million in BankAtlantic Bancorps interest bearing cash balances at the Federal Reserve Bank associated with daily cash management activities; | ||
| an increase in BankAtlantic Bancorps interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions associated with the investment of excess cash reflecting that yields on certificates of deposit at federally insured financial institutions were higher than alternative short term investment yields; | ||
| increase in securities available for sale reflecting BankAtlantic Bancorps purchase of $253.3 million of agency and municipal securities partially offset by the sale of $43.8 million of mortgage-backed securities as well as repayments; | ||
| an increase in derivatives associated with a foreign currency derivative position executed during 2010 as an economic hedge of foreign currency used in BankAtlantics ATM cruise ship operations; | ||
| a decrease in investment securities due to the maturity of investments; | ||
| a decrease in current income tax receivables primarily resulting from the receipt of income tax refunds associated with recent tax law changes which extended the net operating loss carry-back period from two years to up to five years; | ||
| a decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorps tax certificate balances primarily relating to redemptions, partially offset by the purchase of $97.3 million of tax certificates during 2010; | ||
| a decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorps loan receivable balances associated with $107.9 million of charge-offs, $40.7 million of loans transferred to real estate owned, and repayments of loans in the ordinary course of business combined with a significant decline in loan originations and purchases; | ||
| a decrease in accrued interest receivables primarily resulting from tax certificate activities and lower loan balances at BankAtlantic Bancorp; | ||
| a decrease in real estate inventory reflecting a sale of $6.5 million at BankAtlantic and a decrease in Bluegreens real estate inventory, including non-cash charges of approximately $8.7 million, net of purchase accounting; | ||
| an increase in BankAtlantic Bancorps real estate owned and other repossessed assets associated with residential and commercial loan foreclosures; | ||
| a decrease in office properties and equipment resulting from BankAtlantic Bancorps depreciation and the transfer of $18.1 million of fixed assets to assets held for sale net of impairments; | ||
| a decrease in assets held for sale from discontinued operations resulting from the sale of Cores Projects in June 2010; and | ||
| an increase in assets held for sale comprised of cash and fixed assets transferred to held for sale upon the announcement that BankAtlantic intended to pursue the sale of its Tampa operations. |
64
Table of Contents
The Companys total liabilities at September 30, 2010 were $5.7 billion compared to $5.6
billion at December 31, 2009. Other than increases due to the above described change in accounting
principle at January 1,
2010, the primary changes in components of total liabilities from December 31, 2009 to
September 30, 2010 are summarized below:
| a decrease in BankAtlantics interest bearing deposit account balances associated with declines in certificate of deposit balances and the transfer of $259.9 million of Tampa operations interest bearing deposits to deposits held for sale; | ||
| a decrease in BankAtlantics non-interest-bearing deposit balances primarily due to the transfer of $79.5 million of Tampa operations non-interest bearing deposits to held for sale; | ||
| lower FHLB advances at BankAtlantic due to repayments; | ||
| a decrease in notes and mortgage notes payable and other borrowings resulting from net repayments related to Bluegreens debt collateralized by notes receivable; | ||
| an increase in BankAtlantic Bancorps outstanding junior subordinated debentures due to interest deferrals; | ||
| a decrease in liabilities related to assets held for sale from discontinued operations resulting from the sale of Cores Projects in June 2010; and | ||
| an increase in other liabilities associated with $8.2 million of higher loan escrow balances, $5.2 million of securities purchased pending settlement and real estate tax liabilities at BankAtlantic Bancorp. |
65
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
BFC Activities
BFC Activities consists primarily of (i) BFC operations, (ii) our investment in
Benihana and (iii) Woodbridge other operations.
BFC operations primarily consist of our corporate overhead and general and administrative
expenses, the financial results of a venture partnership that BFC controls and other equity
investments, as well as income and expenses associated with human resources, risk management,
investor relations, executive office administration and other services that BFC provides to
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen. BFC operations also include investments made by BFC/CCC, Inc.
Woodbridge other operations consists of the operations of Pizza Fusion Holdings, Inc. (Pizza
Fusion), a restaurant franchisor operating within the quick service and organic food industries,
and the activities of Cypress Creek Capital Holdings, LLC (Cypress Creek Capital) and Snapper
Creek Equity Management, LLC (Snapper Creek). Prior to November 16, 2009, when we acquired
additional shares of Bluegreens common stock giving us a controlling interest in Bluegreen,
Woodbridge other operations included an equity investment in Bluegreen.
The discussion that follows reflects the operations and related matters of BFC Activities (in
thousands).
For The Three Months | For The Nine Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | 2010 | 2009 | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenues |
$ | 517 | 342 | 175 | 1,386 | 843 | 543 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
517 | 342 | 175 | 1,386 | 843 | 543 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost and Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of real estate |
| 4,136 | (4,136 | ) | | 4,153 | (4,153 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
1,439 | 1,869 | (430 | ) | 4,920 | 4,641 | 279 | |||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
6,633 | 8,026 | (1,393 | ) | 20,261 | 22,569 | (2,308 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
| 2,001 | (2,001 | ) | | 2,001 | (2,001 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
8,072 | 16,032 | (7,960 | ) | 25,181 | 33,364 | (8,183 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
(Loss) gain on settlement of investment in
Woodbridges subsidiary |
| | | (1,135 | ) | 26,985 | (28,120 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated
affiliates |
(11 | ) | 11,767 | (11,778 | ) | (38 | ) | 28,729 | (28,767 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates |
| (10,780 | ) | 10,780 | | (31,181 | ) | 31,181 | ||||||||||||||||
Impairment of investments |
| | | | (2,396 | ) | 2,396 | |||||||||||||||||
Other income |
1,403 | 1,502 | (99 | ) | 4,569 | 4,381 | 188 | |||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing
operations before income
taxes |
(6,163 | ) | (13,201 | ) | 7,038 | (20,399 | ) | (6,003 | ) | (14,396 | ) | |||||||||||||
Less: Benefit for income taxes |
(71 | ) | | (71 | ) | (5,718 | ) | | (5,718 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (6,092 | ) | (13,201 | ) | 7,109 | (14,681 | ) | (6,003 | ) | (8,678 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 relate to franchise
revenues generated by Pizza Fusion.
Cost of sales of real estate for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009
was approximately $4.1 million and represents the write-off of capitalized interest associated with
Cores impairment of real estate inventory in 2009.
Interest expense consists of interest incurred less interest capitalized. Interest incurred
totaled $1.4 million and $4.9 million for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively,
compared with $1.9 million and $5.6 million for the same periods in 2009. No interest was
capitalized during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2010 or the three months ended
September 30, 2009, while interest capitalized during the nine months ended
66
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
September 30, 2009 totaled $931,000. This resulted in net interest expense of $1.4 million and
$4.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to
$1.9 million and $4.6 million, respectively, of net interest expense in the same 2009 periods.
General and administrative expenses decreased $1.4 million to $6.6 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 from $8.0 million for the same period in 2009. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, general and administrative expenses decreased $2.3 million to $20.3
million from $22.6 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease in general and administrative
expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was primarily attributable to lower
compensation and benefits expense and professional fees. This was offset in part by higher accrued
audit fees incurred during 2010 and a write-off of intangible assets related to Pizza Fusion.
Included in general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are
management advisory service fees earned in connection with an agreement with Bluegreen (See Note 21
of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for further information).
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, a $2.0 million goodwill impairment was
recorded with respect to the Pizza Fusion investment.
Prior to the consolidation of Bluegreen into our consolidated financial statements on November
16, 2009, we accounted for our investment in Bluegreen under the equity method of accounting. Our
interest in Bluegreens earnings during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
$11.8 million and $28.8 million, respectively (after the amortization of approximately $10.6
million and $24.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively,
related to the change in the basis as a result of other-than-temporary impairment charges on this
investment). During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded $10.8 million
and $31.2 million, respectively, of other-than-temporary impairment charges relating to our equity
method investment in Bluegreen.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded impairment charges of $2.4
million on our investment in Office Depots common stock. The Company sold its remaining shares of
Office Depots common stock during the fourth quarter of 2009.
During the second quarter of 2010, we recognized a tax benefit of approximately $5.4 million
resulting from an expected additional tax refund due to a recent change in IRS guidance,
approximately $1.1 million of which we anticipate paying to the Levitt and Sons estate. The $1.1 million was
recorded in the (loss) gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridges subsidiary and is subject
to change pending a final review of the $5.4 million expected tax refund by the IRS. The gain on
settlement of investment in Woodbridges subsidiary during the nine months ended September 30, 2009
reflected the reversal into income of the loss in excess of investment in Levitt and Sons after the
settlement of Levitt and Sons bankruptcy was finalized. The reversal resulted in a $40.4 million
gain on a consolidated basis in the first quarter of 2009, of which $27 million was recorded in the
BFC Activities segment.
2008 and 2007 Step acquisitions Purchase Accounting
BFCs acquisitions in 2008 and 2007 of additional shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps and
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, respectively, were accounted for as step acquisitions under the
purchase method of accounting then in effect. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities acquired were
revalued to reflect market values at the respective dates of acquisition. The discounts and
premiums arising as a result of such revaluations are generally being accreted or amortized, net of
tax, over the remaining life of the assets and liabilities. The net impact of such accretion,
amortization and other effects of purchase accounting increased our consolidated net loss for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 by approximately $31,000 and $93,000, respectively,
and increased our consolidated net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 by
approximately $5.8 million and $5.1 million, respectively.
BFC Activities- Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments totaling approximately $34 million and $45 million, respectively. The decrease in cash,
cash equivalents and short-term investments was due to BFCs operating and general and
administrative expenses and to the purchase of shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common
Stock in BankAtlantic Bancorps 2010 Rights Offering. This
67
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
decrease was offset in part by the receipt of an income tax refund of approximately $29.2 million,
resulting from recent tax law changes as discussed below.
BFC acquired an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock
in the Rights Offering for an aggregate purchase price of $15.0 million. BFC exercised its basic
subscription rights to purchase 5,986,865 shares, and the remaining 4,013,135 shares were acquired
by BFC pursuant to its over-subscription request. The shares acquired in the Rights Offering
increased BFCs ownership interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 8% to 45% and BFCs
voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 5% to 71%.
Except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen,
Woodbridge and Core are not direct obligations of BFC and generally are non-recourse to BFC.
Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC, absent a dividend or distribution
from those entities. BFCs principal sources of liquidity are its available cash, short-term
investments, dividends or distributions from our subsidiaries and dividends from Benihana. As
discussed further in this report, recent tax law changes have resulted in the receipt of
significant tax refunds. We have received approximately $29.2 million of tax refunds and expect to
receive an additional approximately $10.8 million when the final review is completed by the
Internal Revenue Service. Pursuant to the Levitt and Sons bankruptcy settlement agreement, we
agreed that a portion of the tax refund attributable to the Debtors Estate for periods prior to the
bankruptcy would be paid to the estate, and it is estimated that approximately $11.8 million will
be paid to the estate pursuant to this agreement.
We will use our available funds to fund operations and meet our obligations. We may also use
available funds to make additional investments in the companies within our consolidated group,
invest in equity securities and other investments, or repurchase shares of our common stock
pursuant to our share repurchase program.
Since March 2009, BFC has not received cash dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp and does not
expect to receive cash dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp for the foreseeable future because
BankAtlantic Bancorp is currently prohibited from paying dividends on its common stock.
Furthermore, certain of Bluegreens credit facilities contain terms which might limit the payment
of cash dividends.
BFC, on a parent company only basis, has committed that it will not, without the prior written
non-objection of the OTS, (i) incur, issue, renew or roll over any current lines of credit,
guarantee the debt of any other entity or otherwise incur any additional debt or (ii) declare or
make any dividends or other capital distributions.
We believe that our current financial condition and credit relationships, together with
anticipated cash flows from operating activities and other sources of funds, including tax refunds
and proceeds from the disposition of certain properties or investments, will provide for
anticipated near-term liquidity needs. With respect to long-term liquidity requirements, in
addition to the foregoing, BFC may also seek to raise funds through the issuance of long-term
secured or unsecured indebtedness, equity and/or debt securities or through the sale of assets;
however, there is no assurance that any of these alternatives will be available to BFC on
attractive terms, or at all.
On September 21, 2009, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program which
authorizes the repurchase of up to 20,000,000 shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock at an
aggregate cost of no more than $10 million. The share repurchase program replaced our $10 million
repurchase program that our Board of Directors approved in October 2006 which placed a limitation
on the number of shares which could be repurchased under the program at 1,750,000 shares of Class A
Common Stock. The current program, like the prior program, authorizes management, at its
discretion, to repurchase shares from time to time subject to market conditions and other factors.
No shares were repurchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 or the year ended
December 31, 2009.
The development activities at Carolina Oak, which is within Tradition Hilton Head, were
suspended in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of, among other things, an overall softening of
demand for new homes and a decline in the overall economy. In 2009, the housing industry continued
to face significant challenges and Woodbridge made the decision to cease all activities at Carolina
Oak. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we reviewed the inventory of real estate at Carolina Oak for
impairment and, as a result, recorded a $16.7 million impairment charge to adjust the carrying
amount of Carolina Oaks inventory to its fair value of $10.8 million. Woodbridge is the obligor
under a $37.2 million loan that is collateralized by the Carolina Oak property. During 2009, the
lender declared the loan to be in default and filed an action for foreclosure. While there may have
been an issue with respect to compliance with certain covenants in the loan agreements, we do not
believe that an event of default had occurred as was alleged. Woodbridge continues to seek
satisfactory conclusion with regard to the debt; however, the outcome of these efforts and the
litigation is uncertain.
68
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
During 2008, Woodbridge entered into a settlement agreement, as amended (the Settlement
Agreement), with the Debtors and the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the Joint
Committee) appointed in the Chapter 11 cases related to the Levitt and Sons bankruptcy filing.
Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, among other things, (i) Woodbridge agreed to pay $8 million
to the Debtors bankruptcy estates, establish a $4.5 million release fund to be disbursed to third
party creditors in exchange for a third party release and injunction, pay an additional $300,000 to
a deposit holders fund and waive and release substantially all of the claims it had against the
Debtors, including its administrative expense claims through July 2008, and (ii) the Debtors
(joined by the Joint Committee) agreed to waive and release any claims they had against Woodbridge
and its affiliates. The Settlement Agreement also provided that if, within one year after the
Bankruptcy Courts confirmation of the Settlement Agreement, Section 172 of the Internal Revenue
Code was amended to permit a carry back of tax losses from calendar years 2007 or 2008 to one or
more years preceding calendar year 2005, then Woodbridge would share a portion of any resulting tax
refund with the Debtors and the Joint Committee based on an agreed upon formula. The Settlement
Agreement was subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of the Bankruptcy Court. On
February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly
proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Joint Committee. That order also approved the settlement
pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. No appeal or rehearing of the Bankruptcy Courts order was
timely filed by any party, and the settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time
payment was made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement. Under
cost method accounting, the cost of settlement and the related $52.9 million liability (less
$500,000 which was determined as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant to the
Settlement Agreement) was recognized into income in the first quarter of 2009, resulting in a $40.4
million gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary.
In November 2009, the Workers, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 (the Act)
was enacted. The Act extended the net operating loss (NOL) carry-back period from two years to up
to five years for the 2008 and the 2009 tax years and, as a result, allows us to increase our NOL
carryback period to as much as five years for NOLs generated in 2008 or 2009 and obtain refunds of
taxes paid in the newly included carryback years. The amount of the expected refund to the Company
has been determined to be approximately $40.0 million, of which approximately $29.2 million has
been received. The balance of the tax refund claim of approximately $10.8 million will most likely
be paid when the Internal Revenue Service completes its review. As described above, under the
terms of the Settlement Agreement, a portion of the refund will be payable to the Levitt and Sons
estate. Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of 2009, we accrued approximately $10.7 million in
connection with the portion of the tax refund which may be payable to the Debtors Estate pursuant
to the Settlement Agreement. The gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary of $40.4 million
recorded in the first quarter of 2009 was reduced by the $10.7 million accrual recorded in the
fourth quarter of 2009 resulting in a $29.7 million gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary
for the year ended December 31, 2009. Additionally, in the second quarter of 2010, we increased the
$10.7 million accrual by approximately $1.1 million, representing the portion of an additional tax
refund which we expect to receive due to a recent change in Internal Revenue Service guidance that
will likely be required to be paid to the Debtors Estate pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. As
of September 30, 2010, we have a liability of approximately $11.8 million, representing the
portion of tax refunds to be shared with the Debtors Estate pursuant to the settlement agreement.
As of September 30, 2010, $8.4 million of the $11.8 million portion of the tax refund to be paid to
the Debtors Estate was received and placed in an escrow account. The $8.4 million amount is
included as restricted cash in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition.
As discussed above, on September 21, 2009, BFC and Woodbridge consummated their previously
announced merger pursuant to which Woodbridge merged with BFC. In connection with the merger,
Dissenting Holders who collectively held approximately 4.2 million shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock exercised their appraisal rights and are entitled to receive an amount equal to the
fair value of their shares calculated in accordance with Florida law. The Dissenting Holders have
rejected Woodbridges offer of $1.10 per share and requested payment for their shares based on
their respective fair value estimates of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. In December 2009, the
Company recorded a $4.6 million liability with a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in
capital representing, in the aggregate, Woodbridges offer to the Dissenting Holders. However, the
appraisal rights litigation is currently ongoing and its outcome is uncertain. There is no
assurance as to the amount of cash that we will be required to pay to the Dissenting Holders, which
amount may be greater than the $4.6 million that we have accrued.
The Company owns 800,000 shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock, which it purchased
for $25.00 per share. The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into Benihanas common stock.
Based on the number of currently outstanding shares of Benihanas capital stock, the Convertible
Preferred Stock, if converted, would represent an approximate 19% voting interest and an
approximate 9% economic interest in Benihanas capital stock. The Company has the right to receive
cumulative quarterly dividends on its shares of Benihanas Convertible
69
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
Preferred Stock at an annual rate equal to 5% or $1.25 per share, payable on the last day of
each calendar quarter. It is anticipated that the Company will continue to receive approximately
$250,000 per quarter in dividends on Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock. The Convertible
Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory redemption of $20 million plus accumulated dividends on
July 2, 2014 unless we elect to extend the mandatory redemption date to a date not later than July
2, 2024.
On June 21, 2004, the Company sold 15,000 shares of its 5% Preferred Stock to an investor
group in a private offering. The Companys 5% Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 per
share. The shares of 5% Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option of the Company, from time to
time, at redemption prices ranging from $1,025 per share for the year 2010 to $1,000 per share for
the year 2015 and thereafter. The 5% Preferred Stock liquidation preference is equal to its stated
value of $1,000 per share plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends or an amount equal to the
applicable redemption price in a voluntary liquidation or winding up of the Company. Holders of the
5% Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except as provided by Florida law, and are entitled to
receive, when and as declared by the Companys Board of Directors, cumulative quarterly cash
dividends on each such share at a rate per annum of 5% of the stated value from the date of
issuance. Since June 2004, the Company has paid quarterly dividends on the 5% Preferred Stock of
$187,500. On December 17, 2008, the Company amended certain of the previously designated relative
rights, preferences and limitations of the Companys 5% Preferred Stock. The amendment eliminated
the right of the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock to convert their shares of Preferred Stock into
shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock. The amendment also requires the Company to redeem
shares of the 5% Preferred Stock with the net proceeds it receives in the event (i) the Company
sells any of its shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock, (ii) the Company sells any
shares of Benihanas Common Stock received upon conversion of Benihanas Convertible Preferred
Stock or (iii) Benihana redeems any shares of its Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Company.
Additionally, in the event the Company defaults on its obligation to make dividend payments on its
5% Preferred Stock, the amendment entitles the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock, in place of the
Company, to receive directly from Benihana certain payments on the shares of Benihanas Convertible
Preferred Stock owned by the Company or on the shares of Benihanas Common Stock received by the
Company upon conversion of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that
owns two commercial properties in Hillsborough County, Florida. At September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, the carrying amount of this investment was approximately $665,000 and $690,000,
respectively, which is included in investments in unconsolidated affiliates in the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. In connection with the purchase of the commercial
properties in November 2006, BFC and the unaffiliated member each guaranteed the payment of up to a
maximum of $5.0 million for certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are not
related to the financial performance of the assets. BFC and the unaffiliated member also entered
into a cross indemnification agreement which limits BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts
of BFC and its affiliates.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 50% limited partner interest in a limited
partnership that has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owns an office building in
Tampa, Florida. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying amount of this investment
was approximately $306,000 and $319,000, respectively, which is included in investments in
unconsolidated affiliates in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. In
connection with the purchase of the office building by the limited liability company in June 2007,
BFC guaranteed the payment of certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are
not related to the financial performance of the asset up to a maximum of $15.0 million, or $25.0
million in the event of any petition or involuntary proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or
similar state insolvency laws or in the event of any transfer of interests not in accordance with
the loan documents. BFC and the unaffiliated members also entered into a cross indemnification
agreement which limits BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates.
No amounts are recorded in the Companys financial statements for the obligations associated
with the above guarantees based on the potential indemnification by unaffiliated members and the
limit of the specific obligations to non-financial matters.
70
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Real Estate Operations Segment
The Real Estate Operations segment includes the subsidiaries through which Woodbridge
historically conducted its real estate business activities. These activities are concentrated in
Florida and South Carolina and have included the development and sale of land, the construction and
sale of single family homes and townhomes and the leasing of commercial properties and office
space, and include the operations of Core, Carolina Oak, which engaged in homebuilding activities
in South Carolina prior to the suspension of those activities in the fourth quarter of 2008, and
Cypress Creek Holdings, which engages in leasing activities.
Woodbridges operations historically were concentrated in the real estate industry which is
cyclical in nature. During 2009 and the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the real estate
markets continued to experience a significant downturn. Demand for residential and commercial
inventory in Florida and South Carolina remained weak and land sales continued to decline. The
decrease in land sales and continued cash flow deficits contributed to, among other things, the
deterioration of Cores liquidity. As a result, Core severely limited its development expenditures
in Tradition, Florida and completely discontinued development activity in Tradition Hilton Head.
The value of Cores assets were significantly impaired, resulting in impairment charges relating to
those assets of $78.0 million during 2009, which included $13.6 million of impairment charges
related to assets held for sale. Core is currently in default under the terms of all of its
indebtedness having an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $139.4 million. See Cores
Liquidity and Capital Resources below for more information regarding the status of Cores
outstanding indebtedness.
As a consequence of the reduced activity at Core and in light of current market conditions,
management made the decision to further reduce Cores headcount by 41 employees in 2009 and
recorded severance charges of approximately $1.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Real Estate Operations
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Change | 2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of real estate |
$ | | 130 | (130 | ) | 2,455 | 3,285 | (830 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other revenues |
294 | 512 | (218 | ) | 1,228 | 1,789 | (561 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
294 | 642 | (348 | ) | 3,683 | 5,074 | (1,391 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of real estate |
| 18,144 | (18,144 | ) | 2,175 | 20,106 | (17,931 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
3,054 | 3,480 | (426 | ) | 7,515 | 12,129 | (4,614 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
6,573 | 1,259 | 5,314 | 10,423 | 3,965 | 6,458 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
9,627 | 22,883 | (13,256 | ) | 20,113 | 36,200 | (16,087 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate assets |
| | | 275 | | 275 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
47 | 102 | (55 | ) | 533 | 512 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations
before income taxes |
(9,286 | ) | (22,139 | ) | 12,853 | (15,622 | ) | (30,614 | ) | 14,992 | ||||||||||||||
Benefit for income taxes |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(9,286 | ) | (22,139 | ) | 12,853 | (15,622 | ) | (30,614 | ) | 14,992 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from
discontinued operations, net
of tax |
| (867 | ) | 867 | 2,465 | (1,532 | ) | 3,997 | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (9,286 | ) | (23,006 | ) | 13,720 | (13,157 | ) | (32,146 | ) | 18,989 | |||||||||||||
71
Table of Contents
Real Estate
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Same 2009 Period
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, there were no revenues from sales of real
estate compared to $130,000 for the same period in 2009. The $130,000 recognized for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 was comprised of deferred revenue on previously sold land.
Other revenues decreased to $294,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from
$512,000 for the same period in 2009. The decrease was due to lower rental income as a tenant did
not renew its lease agreement which expired in March 2010.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, there was no cost of sales of real estate
compared to approximated $18.1 million recognized in the three months ended September 30, 2009. The
cost of sales of real estate recognized in the three months ended September 30, 2009 primarily
related to an impairment charge of approximately $17.9 million associated with inventory of real
estate.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $3.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 from $3.5 million for the same 2009 period. The decrease reflects the
overall slowdown of activities at Core, including lower compensation and benefits expense and lower
office related expenses reflecting a reduction in force at Core in 2009, lower sales and marketing
expenses as neither Core nor Carolina Oak engaged in advertising activities in the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, and lower developer expenses related to property owner associations in
Tradition, Florida.
Interest incurred totaled $6.6 million for the three months ended September 30 2010 and $1.9
million for the same 2009 period. No interest was capitalized in the three months ended September
30, 2010 while interest capitalized totaled $663,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded interest expense at the
default rate of interest on its indebtedness based on the terms of its loan agreements.
Additionally, during the third quarter of 2009, the Company ceased capitalizing interest in light
of the significantly reduced development activities in Florida and suspended development activities
in South Carolina. These factors resulted in a higher net interest expense recognized during the
three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Historically, the
capitalized interest allocated to inventory is charged to cost of sales as land and homes are sold.
Cost of sales of real estate for the three months ended September 30, 2009 did not include any
significant amounts of previously capitalized interest.
Interest and other income decreased to $47,000 during three months ended September 30, 2010
from $103,000 during the same period in 2009. The decrease was mainly due to fees reimbursed to us
during the three months ended September 30, 2009 associated with a land sale in Tradition, Florida,
as well as fees received in connection with sales made in prior periods.
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Same 2009 Period
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we sold approximately 8 acres, which
generated revenues of approximately $2.5 million, compared to the sale of approximately 13 acres,
which generated revenues of approximately $1.1 million, in the same 2009 period. We did not
recognize deferred revenue on previously sold land in the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
compared to approximately $2.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Additionally,
we earned $320,000 in revenues from sales of real estate as a result of 1 home sold in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, compared to no home sales in the same 2010 period.
Other revenues decreased to $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from
$1.8 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease was due to lower rental income as a tenant
did not renew its lease agreement which expired in March 2010.
Cost of sales of real estate decreased to $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 from $20.1 million for the same 2009 period due to a $17.9 million impairment charge
associated with real estate inventory recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to no impairment charges of inventory of real estate in the same 2010 period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $7.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 from $12.1 million for the same 2009 period. The decrease reflects the
overall slowdown of
72
Table of Contents
Real Estate
activities at Core, including specifically lower compensation and benefits expense and lower
office related expenses reflecting a reduction in force at Core in 2009, lower sales and marketing
expenses as neither Core nor Carolina Oak engaged in advertising activities in the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, and lower developer expenses related to property owner associations in
Tradition, Florida. In addition, there was lower severance expense at Core in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to the same 2009 period. These decreases were slightly offset by an
increase in professional services and property tax expenses in the nine months ended September 30,
2010 compared to the same 2009 period.
Interest incurred totaled $10.4 million for the nine months ended September 30 2010 and $6.0
million for the same 2009 period. No interest was capitalized in the nine months ended September
30, 2010 while interest capitalized totaled $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded interest expense at the
default rate of interest in accordance with the terms of its loan agreements. Additionally, during
the third quarter of 2009, the Companys ceased capitalizing interest in light of the significantly
reduced development activities in Florida and suspended development activities in South Carolina.
These factors resulted in a net higher interest expense recognized in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Historically, the capitalized interest
allocated to inventory is charged to cost of sales as land and homes are sold. Cost of sales of
real estate for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 did not include any significant
amounts of previously capitalized interest.
Interest and other income increased to $533,000 during the nine months ended September 30,
2010 from $512,000 during the same period in 2009. This increase was mainly due to consulting fees
reimbursed to us during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 associated with a land sale in
Tradition, Florida as well as fees received in connection with sales made in prior periods. The
increase was partially offset by lower forfeited deposits as no deposits were forfeited in the nine
months ended September 30, 2010.
Income from discontinued operations, all of which related to Cores Projects, increased to
$2.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from a loss of $1.5 million in the same
period in 2009. The increase was primarily due to a gain of approximately $2.6 million recorded in
connection with the sale of the Projects in June 2010. See Note 5 of the Notes to Unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Cores Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Core had cash and cash equivalents of $3.4
million and $2.9 million, respectively. Cash increased by $500,000 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 mainly due to the receipt of cash proceeds from a land sale comprising
approximately 8 acres in Tradition, Florida and net cash proceeds from the sale of the commercial
leasing projects, partially offset by cash used to fund Cores general and administrative expenses
and severance payments related to its recent reduction in work force. At September 30, 2010, Core
had no immediate availability under its various lines of credit.
During 2009, the recession continued and the demand for residential and commercial inventory
showed no signs of recovery, particularly in the geographic regions where Cores properties are
located. The decrease in land sales in 2009 and continued cash flow deficits contributed to,
among other things, the deterioration of Cores liquidity. As a result, Core has ceased all
development in Tradition, Florida and Tradition Hilton Head. Its assets have been impaired
significantly and in an effort to bring about an orderly liquidation without a bankruptcy filing,
Core commenced negotiations with all of its lenders seeking to liquidate its assets in an orderly
way. Core is currently in default under the terms of all of its outstanding debt totaling
approximately $139.4 million. During February 2010, with Cores concurrence, a significant portion
of the land in Tradition Hilton Head was placed under the control of a court appointed receiver. In
connection with the receivership, Core entered into a separate agreement with the lender that,
among other things, granted Core a right of first refusal to purchase the $25.6 million loan in the
event that the lender decides to sell the loan to a third party. This loan is collateralized by
inventory that had a net carrying value of $32.3 million, net of impairment charges during 2009 of
approximately $29.6 million. On September 1, 2010, the lender commenced an action to enforce
the guarantee executed by Core in connection with the loan transactions between the lender and Core
South Carolina, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Core. Through this action, the lender seeks to
collect on approximately $25 million of indebtedness guaranteed by Core. On October 25, 2010, Core
filed an answer and affirmative defenses asserting, among other things, that the claim on the
guarantee is not ripe given the banks election to first foreclose against the underlying
collateral. In addition, Core has raised additional equitable defenses to the claim on the
guarantee. Discovery in the case has not yet commenced, and the trial date has been set. The
amount of Cores liability, if any, in this litigation has not been established.
73
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Separately, on April 7, 2010 and April 8, 2010, Investors Warranty of America, Inc.
(IWA) filed actions in South Carolina and Florida, respectively, against Core and certain of its
subsidiaries seeking foreclosure of mortgage loans totaling approximately $113.8 million, plus
additional interest and costs and expenses, including attorneys fees. On September 8, 2010, Core
and its applicable subsidiaries entered into an agreement with IWA, among other parties, relating
to the foreclosure proceedings. IWA subsequently assigned and conveyed its interests in both the
Florida and South Carolina loan facilities to PSL Acquisitions, LLC (PSLA). On November 8, 2010,
Core and its applicable subsidiaries, on the one hand, and PSLA, on the other hand, executed an
agreement which, upon the occurrence of certain events and subject to certain exceptions, provides
for the resolution of the disputes between them. Pursuant to the agreement, Core and its
subsidiaries agreed to, among other things, (i) pledge additional collateral to PSLA consisting of
membership interests in certain subsidiaries of Core, (ii) grant security interests in the acreage
owned by the subsidiaries in Port St. Lucie, Florida, substantially all of which is undeveloped raw
land, (iii) the amendment of the complaint related to the Florida foreclosure action to include
this additional collateral and (iv) the entry into consensual judgments of foreclosure in both
foreclosure actions. Core also agreed to cooperate with PSLA in connection with the enforcement of
its remedies against the collateral. PSLA has agreed, upon the occurrence of certain events and
subject to certain exceptions, not to enforce a deficiency judgment against Core and has released
Core from any other claims arising from or relating to the loans. As of September 30, 2010, the
net carrying value of Cores inventory collateralizing the defaulted loans that are the subject of
the foreclosure proceedings was $78.1 million, net of impairment charges during 2009 of
approximately $33.7 million. There was no impairment charge during the nine months ended September
30, 2010.
In December 2009, Core reinitiated efforts to sell its two commercial leasing projects
referred to as the Projects and began soliciting bids from several potential buyers to purchase
assets associated with the Projects. Due to this decision, the assets associated with the Projects
were classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented in accordance with the
accounting guidance for the disposal of long-lived assets. On June 10, 2010, Core completed the
sale of the Projects to Inland Real Estate Acquisition, Inc. (Inland) with a sales price of
approximately $75.4 million. As a result of the sale, Core realized a gain on sale of discontinued
operations of approximately $2.6 million in the second quarter of 2010. The sale resulted in net
cash proceeds to Core of approximately $1.5 million. See Note 5 of the Notes to Unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Core was also a party to a certain Development Agreement with the city of Hardeeville, SC,
under which Core was obligated to fund $1 million towards the building of a fire station. Funding
was scheduled in three installments: the first installment of $100,000 was due on October 21, 2009;
the second installment of $450,000 was due on January 1, 2010; and the final installment of
$450,000 was due on April 1, 2010. Additionally, Core was obligated to fund certain staffing costs
of $200,000 under the terms of this agreement. Core did not pay any of the required installments
and has not funded the $200,000 payment for staffing. On November 5, 2009, Core received a notice
of default from the city for non payment. In the event that Core does
not make these payments, it may be unable to cure the default on its obligation to the city,
which could result in a loss of entitlements associated with the development project.
Based on an ongoing evaluation of its cost structure and in light of current market
conditions, Core reduced its head count by 41 employees during 2009, resulting in approximately
$1.3 million in severance charges which were recorded during the fourth quarter of 2009. In the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, severance related payments at Core totaled
approximately $140,000 and $1.1 million, respectively.
The negative impact of the adverse real estate market conditions on Core, together with Cores
limited liquidity, have caused substantial doubt regarding Cores ability to continue as a going
concern. Woodbridge has not committed to fund any of Cores obligations or cash requirements, and
it is not currently anticipated that Woodbridge will provide any funds to Core. As a result, the
consolidated financial statements and the financial information provided for Core do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Cores results are reported
in the Real Estate Operations segment. See Note 19 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this report.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
In connection with the development of certain of Cores projects, community development,
special assessment or improvement districts have been established which may have utilized tax-exempt bond
financing to fund construction or acquisition of certain on-site and off-site infrastructure
improvements near or at these communities. The obligation to
pay principal and interest on the bonds issued by the districts is assigned to each parcel within
the district, and a priority assessment lien may be placed on benefited parcels to provide security
for the debt service. The bonds, including interest and redemption premiums, if any, and the
associated priority lien on the property are
74
Table of Contents
Real Estate
typically payable, secured and satisfied by revenues, fees, or assessments levied on the
property benefited. Core pays a portion of the revenues, fees, and assessments levied by the
districts on the properties it still owns that are benefited by the improvements. Core may also be
required to pay down a specified portion of the bonds at the time each unit or parcel is sold. The
costs of these obligations were capitalized to inventory during the development period and
recognized as cost of sales when the properties are sold.
Cores bond financing at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of district bonds
totaling $218.7 million at each of these dates with outstanding amounts of approximately $180.8
million and $170.8 million, respectively. Bond obligations at September 30, 2010 mature in 2035
and 2040. As of September 30, 2010, Core owned approximately 4% of the property subject to
assessments within the community development district and approximately 91% of the property subject
to assessments within the special assessment district. During the three months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, Core recorded a liability of approximately $103,000 and $220,000, respectively, in
assessments on property owned by it in the districts. During the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, Core recorded a liability of approximately $328,000 and $537,000, respectively, in
assessments on property owned by it in the districts. Core is responsible for any assessed amounts
until the underlying property is sold and will continue to be responsible for the annual
assessments through the maturity dates of the respective bonds issued if the property is never
sold. Based on Cores approximate 91% ownership of property within the special assessment district
as of September 30, 2010, it will be responsible for the payment of approximately $10 million in
assessments by March 2011. If Core sells land within the special assessment district and reduces
its ownership percentage, the potential payment of approximately $10 million would decrease in
relation to the decrease in the ownership percentage. In addition, Core has guaranteed payments for
assessments under the district bonds in Tradition, Florida which would require funding if future
assessments to be allocated to property owners are insufficient to repay the bonds. Management has
evaluated this exposure based upon the criteria in accounting guidance for contingencies, and has
determined that there have been no substantive changes to the projected density or land use in the
development subject to the bond which would make it probable that Core would have to fund future
shortfalls in assessments.
In accordance with accounting guidance for real estate, the Company records a liability for
the estimated developer obligations that are fixed and determinable and user fees that are required
to be paid or transferred at the time the parcel or unit is sold to an end user. At September 30,
2010, the liability related to developer obligations associated with Cores ownership of the
property was $175,000 after the sale of Cores commercial leasing projects in June 2010 (See Note 5
of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for information relating to the
sale). At December 31, 2009, the liability related to developer obligations was $3.3 million, of
which $3.1 million was included in the liabilities related to assets held for sale in the
accompanying consolidated statement of financial condition as of December 31, 2009.
The following table summarizes our Real Estate and Other contractual obligations (excluding
those of Bluegreen) as of September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||
More than | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | 13 - 36 | 37 - 60 | 60 | |||||||||||||||||
Category | Total | 12 Months | Months | Months | Months | |||||||||||||||
Debt obligations (1) |
$ | 273,281 | 176,842 | 503 | 10,725 | 85,211 | ||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations (2) |
940 | 714 | 167 | 59 | | |||||||||||||||
Severance related termination
obligations |
19 | 19 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total obligations |
$ | 274,240 | 177,575 | 670 | 10,784 | 85,211 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Amounts represent scheduled principal payments. Debt obligations consist of notes, mortgage notes and bonds payable and junior subordinated debentures. The timing of contractual payments for debt obligations assumes the exercise of all extensions available at our sole discretion. Debt obligations include defaulted loans totaling approximately $176.6 million as of September 30, 2010, of which repayment of the outstanding debt was accelerated by the lender and is currently being shown as immediately due and payable in less than 12 months. See Note 3 and Note 15 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this report for more information regarding the defaulted loans. | |
(2) | Operating lease obligations consist of lease commitments. |
75
Table of Contents
Real Estate
In addition to the above contractual obligations, we have $2.4 million in unrecognized
tax benefits in accordance with accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes, which provides
guidance for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial
statements uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take on a tax return.
At each of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Core had outstanding surety bonds of
approximately $495,000, which were related primarily to its obligations to various governmental
entities to construct improvements in its various communities. It is estimated that approximately
$495,000 of work remains to complete these improvements and it is not currently anticipated that
any outstanding surety bonds will be drawn upon.
Levitt and Sons, Woodbridges former wholly-owned homebuilding subsidiary, had approximately
$33.3 million of surety bonds related to its ongoing projects at
November 9, 2007, the date on
which Levitt and Sons and substantially all of its subsidiaries filed voluntary bankruptcy
petitions (the Chapter 11 Cases). In the event that these obligations are drawn and paid by the
surety, Woodbridge could be responsible for up to $7.6 million plus costs and expenses in
accordance with the surety indemnity agreements executed by Woodbridge. At September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, Woodbridge had $490,000 and $527,000, respectively, in surety bond accruals
related to certain bonds where management believes it to be probable that Woodbridge will be
required to reimburse the surety under applicable indemnity agreements. Woodbridge reimbursed the
surety approximately $85,000 and $122,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively, in accordance with the indemnity agreement for bond claims paid during the
period. No reimbursements were made in the three or nine month periods ended September 30, 2010. It
is unclear whether and to what extent the remaining outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons
will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be responsible for additional amounts beyond
the previous accrued amount. Woodbridge will not receive any repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery
of any amounts it may be required to pay. In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require
Woodbridge to post collateral against a portion of the surety bonds exposure in connection with
demands made by a municipality. While Woodbridge did not believe that the
municipality had the right
to demand payment under the bonds, based on the claims made by the
municipality on the bonds, the surety requested that Woodbridge post a $4.0
million escrow deposit while the matter was being litigated with the municipality and Woodbridge
complied with that request. In August 2010, Woodbridge was granted a motion for summary judgment
terminating any obligations under the bonds. Subsequent to the motion being granted the
municipality appealed the decision.
Bluegreen
Bluegreens results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are
reported through two reportable segments which are Bluegreen Resorts and Bluegreen Communities. For
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, our earnings attributable to Bluegreen were
reported under the equity method of accounting as part of Woodbridge other operations which
continues to be included in the BFC Activities segment. Bluegreen is a separate public company, and the following information is derived from the
Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of
Bluegreens Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010.
Bluegreens results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 reflect its
continued efforts to improve its cash flows from operations by targeting higher cash from sales of
VOIs by continuing to improve its selling and marketing efficiencies in its Resorts Division and by
efforts to increase its cash fee-based service businesses. While its cash flows from operations and
its Resorts Division segment operating margin reflects the success of these efforts, the
Communities Division continued to be impacted by low consumer demand for homesites.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010:
| Bluegreens system-wide sales of VOIs totaled $90.0 million. | ||
| The Bluegreen Communities Division generated a segment operating loss of approximately $12.4 million, including non-cash impairment charges of $8.7 million associated with the write-down of the inventory balances of certain phases of its communities properties. | ||
| Bluegreens sales and marketing fee-based service business sold $22.1 million of third-party developer inventory and earned sales and marketing commissions of $15.1 million. |
76
Table of Contents
Real Estate
| Bluegreen recorded a non-cash charge of $15.8 million to increase the allowance for loan losses on its VOI notes receivables generated prior to December 15, 2008 (the date Bluegreen implemented FICO-based credit underwriting standards), as certain lower FICO receivables are expected to experience higher than originally anticipated losses. | ||
| Bluegreens adoption of the amendment to the accounting guidance associated with the consolidation of VIEs on January 1, 2010, resulted in its consolidation of seven existing special purpose financing entities that are associated with past securitization transactions. In addition to the changes to the Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition (see Note 2 of the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements), the consolidation of these special purpose finance entities impacted the Statement of Operations during the three months ended September 30, 2010 by increasing Bluegreens interest income from VOI notes receivable and increasing interest expense on notes payable, compared to prior periods. | ||
| Bluegreen successfully completed the securitization of $36.1 million of the lowest FICO-score loans previously financed in the BB&T Purchase Facility, for gross cash proceeds of $24.3 million. Substantially all of the timeshare receivables included in this transaction were generated prior to December 15, 2008 and had FICO scores below 600. |
As discussed further under Liquidity and Capital Resources, Bluegreen Resorts sales and
marketing operations are materially dependent on the availability of liquidity in the credit
markets. Historically, Bluegreen has provided financing to a significant portion of its Bluegreen
Resorts customers. Such financing typically involves the consumer making a minimum 10% cash down
payment, with the balance being financed by Bluegreen over a ten-year period. As Bluegreen
Resorts selling, general and administrative expenses typically exceed the cash down payment,
Bluegreen has historically maintained credit facilities pursuant to which Bluegreen pledged or sold
its consumer note receivables. Furthermore, Bluegreen also engaged in private placement term
securitization transactions or similar arrangements to periodically pay down all or a portion of
its note receivable credit facilities.
Bluegreen continues to actively pursue additional credit facility capacity, capital markets
transactions and alternative financing solutions, and hopes that the steps being taken will
position Bluegreen to maintain its existing credit relationships as well as attract new sources of
capital. Regardless of the state of the credit markets, Bluegreen believes that its resorts
management and finance operations will continue to represent recurring cash-generating sources of
income which do not require material liquidity support from the credit markets. Further, Bluegreen
believes that it has adequate timeshare inventory to satisfy its projected sales for 2010 and,
based on anticipated sales levels, for a number of years thereafter.
While the vacation ownership business has historically been capital intensive, Bluegreens
goal is to leverage its sales and marketing, mortgage servicing, fee-based management services,
title and construction expertise to generate fee-based-service relationships with third parties
that produce positive cash flows and require less capital investment. During the three months ended
September 30, 2010, Bluegreen sold $22.1 million of third-party inventory and earned sales and
marketing commissions of approximately $15.1 million, as well as title fees on such transactions.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Bluegreen sold $56.0 million of third-party
inventory and earned sales and marketing commissions of approximately $37.5 million, as well as
title fees on such transactions. Bluegreen also provides fee-based management services, resort
design and development services, and mortgage services under certain of these arrangements, all for
cash fees. Bluegreen intends to pursue additional fee-based service relationships, and while there
is no assurance that this will be the case, Bluegreen believes that these activities will become an
increasing portion of its business over time.
While, as described above, part of Bluegreens overall business strategy is cash conservation,
it may periodically explore and enter into real-estate-related acquisitions, which it believes
represents strategic business opportunities and are accretive to its cashflows in the near term. In
October 2010, the Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture acquired Paradise Point Resort, which is
located in close proximity to the existing Wilderness Club at Big Cedar in Ridgedale, Missouri. The
Paradise Point Resort acquisition consisted of land, completed residential units (consisting of
both condominium and timeshare units), the right to construct additional VOI units on the acquired
property, as well as a clubhouse and related recreational areas. The property was acquired with the
intent to expand the amount of completed VOI inventory available for sale by the Bluegreen/Big
Cedar Joint Venture as well as to develop and sell new VOI inventory in the future. In connection
with the acquisition, Bluegreen has assumed management of the property. The purchase price of
Paradise Point Resort was $7.7 million, of which $2.25 million was paid in cash and the balance of
$5.45 million was financed with a note payable to Foundation Capital Resources, Inc., a lender
affiliated with the seller. Additionally, in a separate transaction in October 2010, the
Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture acquired a 109-acre development parcel, located adjacent to
existing Wilderness
77
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Club at Big Cedar, from an affiliate of Big Cedar, LLC. The parcel was acquired with the
intent to develop future VOI inventory for sale by the Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture. The
purchase price of the parcel was $10.0 million, of which $2.25 million was paid in cash and the
balance of $7.75 million was financed with a note payable to Foundation Capital Resources, Inc.
Both notes payable to Foundation Capital Resources, Inc. have maturities of 5 years (the note
underlying the 109-acre parcel purchase has a 2-year extension provision subject to certain
conditions) and bear interest at a rate of 8% for three years, which then adjusts to the lower of
4.75% over prime or the lender specified rate, not to exceed 9%. Repayments of the notes will be
based upon the release payments from future sales of VOIs located on the underlying properties,
subject to minimum payments stipulated in the agreements.
Bluegreen has historically experienced and expects to continue to experience seasonal
fluctuations in its gross revenues and results of operations. This seasonality may result in
fluctuations in its quarterly operating results. Although Bluegreen typically sees more potential
customers at its sales offices during the quarters ending in June and September, ultimate
recognition of the resulting sales during these periods may be delayed due to down payment
requirements for recognition of real estate sales under GAAP or due to the timing of development
and the requirement that it use the percentage-of-completion method of accounting.
Bluegreen believes that inflation and changing prices have had a material impact on its
revenues and results of operations. Bluegreen has increased the sales prices of its VOIs
periodically and has experienced increased construction and development costs from time to time
during the last several years. There is no assurance that Bluegreen will be able to increase or
maintain the current level of its sales prices or that increased construction costs will not have
a material adverse impact on its gross margin. In addition, to the extent that inflation in
general or increased prices for our VOIs adversely impacts consumer demand, its results of
operations could be adversely impacted. While Bluegreen has recently reduced sales prices of its
homesites in response to low levels of consumer demand, these same factors may in the future affect
its Bluegreen Communities segment. Also, to the extent inflationary trends, tightened credit
markets or other factors affect interest rates, its debt service costs may increase.
The Bluegreen Communities business has been, and continues to be, adversely impacted by the
deterioration in the real estate markets. Bluegreen has experienced a material decrease in demand,
and a significant decrease in sales volume. Bluegreen has significantly reduced prices on certain
of its homesites in an attempt to increase sales activity. As a result of its continued low volume
of sales, reduced prices, and the impact of reduced sales on the forecasted sell-out period of our
communities projects, Bluegreen recorded non-cash impairment charges of $8.7 million and $11.7
million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. There can be no
assurances that future changes in our intentions, expectations, or pricing will not result in
future material charges or adjustments to the carrying amount of its communities inventory or
otherwise adversely impact its results and financial condition in the future.
The challenging credit markets have negatively impacted Bluegreens financing activities.
While the credit markets appear to be recovering and Bluegreen entered into a term securitization
and new financing facility during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the number of
securitization and hypothecation transactions being consummated in the market overall remains below
historical levels and Bluegreen believes that those that are consummated are more difficult to
effect and are generally priced at a higher cost than in prior periods. There can be no assurance
that Bluegreen will be able to secure financing for its VOI notes receivable on acceptable terms,
if at all.
78
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreen Segments Financial Results
The following tables include Bluegreens financial results for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010. No comparative analysis was performed as Bluegreens results prior to November
16, 2009 are not included in the financial results below, but rather our earnings attributable to
Bluegreen were reported under the equity method of accounting in our BFC Activities segment.
Bluegreen Resorts | Bluegreen Communities | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage | Percentage | Percentage | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | of Sales | Amount | of Sales | Amount | of Sales | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
System-wide sales (1) |
$ | 90,002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in sales deferred
under timeshare
accounting rules |
4,854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated uncollectible
VOI notes receivable |
(8,908 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
System-wide sales, net |
85,948 | 100 | % | $ | 3,137 | 100 | % | $ | 89,085 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
Sales of third-party VOIs |
(22,090 | ) | (26 | ) | | | (22,090 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Adjustment to allowance
for loan losses |
(9,076 | ) | (11 | ) | | | (9,076 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Sales of real estate |
54,782 | 64 | 3,137 | 100 | 57,919 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of real estate sales |
(10,473 | ) | (16) | * | (11,367 | ) | (362) | * | (21,840 | ) | (33) | * | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
44,309 | 84 | * | (8,230 | ) | (262) | * | 36,079 | 67 | * | ||||||||||||||
Fee-based sales
commission revenue |
15,148 | 18 | | | 15,148 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other resort fee-based
services revenues |
17,170 | 20 | | | 17,170 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other revenues |
| | 433 | 14 | 433 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of other resort
fee-based services |
(12,535 | ) | (15 | ) | | | (12,535 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Cost of other operations |
| | (866 | ) | (28 | ) | (866 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Segment selling, general
and administrative
expenses (2) |
(45,997 | ) | (54 | ) | (3,752 | ) | (120 | ) | (49,749 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||||||||||
Segment operating profit
(loss) |
$ | 18,095 | 21 | $ | (12,415 | ) | (396 | ) | $ | 12,389 | 6 | |||||||||||||
79
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreen Resorts | Bluegreen Communities | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage | Percentage | Percentage | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | of Sales | Amount | of Sales | Amount | of Sales | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
System-wide sales (1) |
$ | 218,185 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in sales deferred
under timeshare
accounting rules |
(1,660 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated uncollectible
VOI notes receivable |
(20,269 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
System-wide sales, net |
196,256 | 100 | % | $ | 9,740 | 100 | % | $ | 205,996 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
Sales of third-party VOIs |
(56,045 | ) | (29 | ) | | | (56,045 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Adjustment to allowance
for loan losses |
(22,317 | ) | (11 | ) | | | (22,317 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Sales of real estate |
117,894 | 60 | 9,740 | 100 | 127,634 | 62 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of real estate sales |
(22,646 | ) | (16) | * | (19,559 | ) | (201) | * | (42,205 | ) | (28) | * | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
95,248 | 84 | * | (9,819 | ) | (101) | * | 85,429 | 72 | * | ||||||||||||||
Fee-based sales
commission revenue |
37,458 | 19 | | | 37,458 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other resort fee-based
services revenues |
49,263 | 25 | | | 49,263 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other revenues |
| | 1,283 | 13 | 1,283 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of other resort
fee-based services |
(35,930 | ) | (18 | ) | | | (35,930 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Cost of other operations |
| | (2,526 | ) | (26 | ) | (2,526 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Segment selling, general
and administrative
expenses (2) |
(114,771 | ) | (58 | ) | (10,620 | ) | (109 | ) | (125,391 | ) | (61 | ) | ||||||||||||
Segment operating profit
(loss) |
$ | 31,268 | 16 | $ | (21,682 | ) | (223 | ) | $ | 9,586 | 5 | |||||||||||||
* | Percentages for Bluegreen Resorts cost of real estate sales and gross profit are calculated as a percentage of sales of real estate. | |
(1) | Includes sales of VOIs made on behalf of third parties, which are transacted through the same process as the sale of Bluegreens vacation ownership inventory, and involve similar selling and marketing costs. | |
(2) | General and administrative expenses attributable to corporate overhead have been excluded from the tables. Corporate general and administrative expenses (excluding mortgage operations) totaled $8.3 million and $31.7 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. (See Corporate General and Administrative Expenses below for further discussion). |
80
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreen Resorts
Bluegreen Resorts Resort Sales and Marketing
The following table sets forth certain information for sales of both Bluegreen VOIs (before
giving effect to the percentage-of-completion method of accounting and the deferral of sales in
accordance with timeshare accounting rules) and VOI sales made on behalf of third-party developers
for a fee, for the periods indicated:
For the Three | For the Nine | |||||||
Months | Months | |||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Number of sales offices operated at the end of the period |
20 | 20 | ||||||
Number of Bluegreen VOI sales transactions |
5,569 | 14,217 | ||||||
Number of sales made on behalf of third-party developers
for a fee |
1,792 | 4,588 | ||||||
Total VOI sales transactions |
7,361 | 18,805 | ||||||
Average sales price per transaction |
$ | 12,212 | $ | 11,986 | ||||
Number of total prospects tours |
47,750 | 121,329 | ||||||
Sale-to-tour conversion ratio total prospects |
15.4 | % | 15.5 | % | ||||
Number of new prospects tours |
28,463 | 70,200 | ||||||
Sale-to-tour conversion ratio new prospects |
10.1 | % | 10.7 | % | ||||
Sales to existing Bluegreen Vacation Club owners as a
percentage of system-wide sales |
58 | % | 58 | % |
Other Resort Fee-Based Services
The following table sets forth pre-tax profit generated from Bluegreens fee-based management
and other services (in thousands):
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||
Ended September 30, 2010 | Ended September 30, 2010 | |||||||
Fee-based management
services |
$ | 5,890 | $ | 19,540 | ||||
Title operations |
2,427 | 5,470 | ||||||
Net carrying cost of
developer inventory |
(2,276 | ) | (7,593 | ) | ||||
Other |
(149 | ) | (343 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 5,892 | $ | 17,074 | ||||
81
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreen Communities
The table below sets forth the number of homesites sold by Bluegreen Communities and the
average sales price per homesite for the periods indicated, excluding sales of bulk parcels, and
before giving effect to the percentage-of-completion method of accounting:
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||
Ended September 30, 2010 | Ended September 30, 2010 | |||||||
Number of homesites sold |
46 | 175 | ||||||
Average sales price per
homesite |
$ | 62,554 | $ | 60,063 |
Finance Operations
As of September 30, 2010, Bluegreens finance operations included the ongoing excess interest
spread earned on $739.5 million of notes receivable. This amount reflects the consolidation of
notes receivable held by seven of Bluegreens special purpose finance entities that occurred on
January 1, 2010, that were previously not consolidated by Bluegreen in accordance with
then-prevailing generally accepted accounting principles (see Note 2 of the Notes to Unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information).
Profit from Notes Receivable Portfolio and Mortgage Servicing Operations
The following table details the sources of Bluegreens income and related expenses associated
with its notes receivable portfolio (in thousands):
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
Income |
||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||
VOI notes receivable |
$ | 20,818 | $ | 80,919 | ||||
Other |
51 | 132 | ||||||
Total interest income |
20,869 | 81,051 | ||||||
Servicing fee income: |
||||||||
Fee-based services |
58 | 104 | ||||||
Total income |
20,927 | 81,155 | ||||||
Expenses |
||||||||
Interest expense on
receivable-backed notes payable |
10,890 | 34,616 | ||||||
Cost of mortgage servicing operations |
664 | 1,852 | ||||||
Total expenses |
11,554 | 36,468 | ||||||
Pre-tax profit on notes receivable
portfolio and mortgage servicing
operations |
$ | 9,373 | $ | 44,687 | ||||
Mortgage Servicing Operations.
Bluegreens mortgage servicing operations include processing payments, and performing collections
of notes receivable owned by them, as well as collecting payments on notes receivable owned by
third parties. In addition, Bluegreens mortgage servicing operations facilitate the monetization
of its VOI notes receivable through its various credit facilities, as well as perform monthly
reporting activities for its lenders and receivable investors. Prior to the adoption of the
amendment to the accounting guidance for the consolidation of VIEs on January 1, 2010, Bluegreen
recognized servicing fee income for providing mortgage servicing for notes receivable that had been
sold to off-balance sheet special purpose finance entities and for providing loan services to other
third-party portfolio owners,
82
Table of Contents
Real Estate
on a cash-fee basis. Effective January 1, 2010, Bluegreen ceased recognizing servicing fee income
for providing mortgage serving to its special purpose finance entities as such entities are now
consolidated by Bluegreen (see Note 2 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information). While Bluegreen still receives mortgage servicing fees for servicing
its securitized notes receivable, those amounts are now accounted for as a component of interest
income.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 servicing fee income represented
mortgage servicing fees earned on behalf of a third-party lender in connection with one of
Bluegreens fee-based services arrangements. As of September 30, 2010, the total amount of notes
receivable serviced by Bluegreen under this arrangement was $20.4 million.
Interest Expense
Interest expense on receivable-backed notes payable was $10.9 million and $34.6 million,
respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. These amounts reflect higher
average debt balance due to the recognition of approximately $411.4 million of non-recourse
receivable-backed debt as a result of the consolidation of Bluegreens special purpose finance
entities as of January 1, 2010.
Other interest expense, which is mainly comprised of interest on lines of credit and notes
payable and the subordinated debentures, was $6.0 million and $14.9 million, respectively, for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. Additionally, on March 30, 2010, the interest rate
on the securities issued by the Bluegreen Statutory Trust (BST) I contractually changed from a
fixed-rate of 9.160% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR + 4.90% (5.19% as of September
30, 2010). On July 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by BST II and BST III
contractually changed from a fixed-rate of 9.158% and 9.193%, respectively, to in each case a
variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR + 4.85% (5.14% as of September 30, 2010). The impact of
the decreased BST interest rates described above was partly offset by higher interest rates on
certain extensions to existing debt agreements.
Bluegreens effective cost of borrowing was 6.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Corporate General and Administrative Expenses
Bluegreens corporate general and administrative expenses consist primarily of expenses
associated with administering the various support functions at its corporate headquarters,
including accounting, human resources, information technology, treasury, and legal. Overall
corporate and general administrative costs may fluctuate between periods for various reasons,
including but not limited to the timing of professional services and litigation expenses. Corporate
general and administrative expenses, excluding mortgage servicing operations, were $8.3 million and
$31.7 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Non-controlling Interest in Income of Consolidated Subsidiary
We include the results of operations and financial position of Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations,
LLC, Bluegreens 51%-owned subsidiary, in our consolidated financial statements (See Note 4 of the
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for further information). Non-controlling
interest in income of consolidated subsidiary was approximately $4.1 million and $7.0 million,
respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Bluegreens Liquidity and Capital Resources
Bluegreens primary sources of funds from internal operations are: (i) cash sales, (ii) down
payments on homesite and VOI sales that are financed, (iii) proceeds from the sale of, or
borrowings collateralized by, notes receivable, including cash received from its residual interests
in such transactions, (iv) cash from its finance operations, including principal and interest
payments received on the purchase money mortgage loans arising from sales of VOIs and homesites and
mortgage servicing fees, and (v) net cash generated from its sales and marketing fee-based services
and other resort services, including its resorts management operations, and other communities
operations.
83
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Historically, Bluegreens business model has depended on the availability of credit in the
commercial markets. VOI sales are generally dependent upon Bluegreen providing financing to its
buyers. Bluegreens ability to sell and/or borrow against its notes receivable from VOI buyers is a
critical factor in its continued liquidity. When Bluegreen sells VOIs, a financed buyer is only
required to pay a minimum of 10% to 20% of the purchase price in cash at the time of sale; however,
selling, marketing, and administrative expenses attributable to the sale are primarily cash
expenses that generally exceed the buyers minimum required down-payment. Accordingly, having
financing facilities available for the hypothecation, sale, or transfer of these vacation ownership
receivables is a critical factor in Bluegreens ability to meet its short and long-term cash needs.
Historically, Bluegreen has relied on its ability to sell receivables in the term securitization
market in order to generate liquidity and create capacity in its receivable facilities. In
addition, maintaining adequate VOI inventory to sell and pursue growth into new markets has
historically required Bluegreen to incur debt for the acquisition, construction and development of
new resorts. Bluegreen Communities has also historically incurred debt for the acquisition and
development of its residential land communities.
The challenging credit markets have negatively impacted Bluegreens financing activities.
While the credit markets appear to be recovering and Bluegreen entered into a term securitization
and new financing facility during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the number of
securitization and hypothecation transactions being consummated in the market overall remains below
historical levels and Bluegreen believes that those that are consummated are more difficult to
effect and are generally priced at a higher cost than in prior periods. There is no assurance that
Bluegreen will be able to secure future financing for its VOI notes receivable on acceptable terms,
if at all.
Bluegreen has certain strategic initiatives in place with a view to better position its
operations in light of the downturn in the commercial credit markets. Bluegreen intends to continue
to monitor its operating results as well as the external environment in order to attempt to adjust
its business to existing conditions. The ongoing goals of its strategic initiatives are designed
to conserve cash and enhance its financial position, to the extent possible by:
| Maintaining a significantly reduced sales level in its Resorts business in an effort to match its sales pace to its liquidity and known receivable capacity; | ||
| Emphasizing cash-based business in its sales, resort management and finance operations, with particular focus on growing its fee-based service business; | ||
| Minimizing the cash requirements of Bluegreen Communities; | ||
| Maintaining reduced levels of overhead and continuing to seek increasing efficiency; | ||
| Minimizing capital spending; | ||
| Working with its lenders to renew, extend, or refinance its credit facilities; | ||
| Maintaining compliance under its outstanding indebtedness; and | ||
| Continuing to provide what Bluegreen believes to be a high level of quality vacation experiences and customer service to its VOI owners. |
While Bluegreen believes that it has realized initial success with its strategic initiatives,
there is no assurance that Bluegreen will be successful in achieving its goals.
While the vacation ownership business has historically been capital intensive, one of
Bluegreens principal goals in the current environment is to utilize its sales and marketing,
mortgage servicing, fee-based management services, title and construction expertise to pursue
fee-based-service business relationships that require low up-front capital investment and produce
strong cash flows for its business.
The advance periods of Bluegreens receivable-backed credit facilities expire within the next
year. Bluegreen intends to continue its efforts to renew and extend the advance periods under
certain of its existing receivable-backed credit facilities, and to seek additional similar credit
facilities and to pursue transactions in the securitization markets, and Bluegreen believes that
the implementation of its strategic initiatives has better positioned them to address these matters
with its existing and future lenders; however, there is no assurance that its efforts will be
successful, in which case, its liquidity would be significantly adversely impacted. Further, while
Bluegreen may seek to raise additional debt or equity financing in the future to fund operations or
repay outstanding debt, there is no assurance that such financing will be available to them on
favorable terms or at all. In light of the current trading price of Bluegreens common stock,
financing involving the issuance of its common stock or securities convertible into its common
stock would be highly dilutive to its existing shareholders.
84
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreens levels of debt and debt service requirements have several important effects on its
operations, including the following: (i) its significant cash requirements to service debt reduce
the funds available for operations and future business opportunities and increase its vulnerability
to adverse economic and industry conditions, as well as conditions in the credit markets,
generally; (ii) its leverage position increases its vulnerability to economic and competitive
pressures; (iii) the financial covenants and other restrictions contained in indentures, credit
agreements and other agreements relating to its indebtedness requires Bluegreen to meet certain
financial tests and restricts its ability to, among other things, borrow additional funds, dispose
of assets, make investments, or pay cash dividends on or repurchase common stock; and (iv) its
leverage position may limit funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions
and general corporate purposes. Certain of Bluegreens competitors operate on a less leveraged
basis and have greater operating and financial flexibility than Bluegreen has.
Credit Facilities
The following is a discussion of Bluegreens material purchase and credit facilities,
including those that were important sources of its liquidity as of September 30, 2010. These
facilities do not constitute all of its outstanding indebtedness as of September 30, 2010.
Bluegreens other indebtedness includes outstanding junior subordinated debentures, borrowings
collateralized by real estate inventories that were not incurred pursuant to a significant credit
facility, and capital leases.
Credit Facilities for Bluegreen Receivables with Future Availability
Bluegreen maintains various credit facilities with financial institutions that provide
receivable financing for its operations. Bluegreen had the following credit facilities with future
availability as of September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
Outstanding | Advance | |||||||||||||||
Balance as | Availability | Period | Borrowing | |||||||||||||
Revolving | of | as of | Expiration; | Rate; Rate as | ||||||||||||
Borrowing | September | September | Borrowing | of June 30, | ||||||||||||
Limit | 30, 2010 | 30, 2010 | Maturity | 2010 | ||||||||||||
August 31, 2011; | Prime + 3.50%; | |||||||||||||||
BB&T Purchase Facility(1) |
$ | 125,000 | $ | 93,462 | $ | 31,538 | September 5, 2023 | 6.75% | ||||||||
November 26, 2010; | Prime+2.25%; | |||||||||||||||
Liberty Bank Facility(1) |
75,000 | 71,585 | 3,418 | August 27, 2014 | 6.50% (2) | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 200,000 | $ | 165,044 | $ | 34,956 | ||||||||||
(1) | Facility is revolving during the advance period, providing additional availability as the facility is paid down, subject to eligible collateral and applicable terms and conditions. | |
(2) | Interest charged on this facility is variable, subject to a floor of 6.5%. |
BB&T Purchase Facility. On September 2, 2010, the BB&T Purchase Facility was amended and restated,
extending the revolving advance period under the facility to August 31, 2011. The facility limit
will initially revolve up to $125.0 million. Should a takeout financing (as defined in the
applicable facility agreements) occur prior to August 31, 2011, the facility limit will decrease to
$50.0 million. The BB&T Purchase Facility provides for the financing of our timeshare receivables
at an advance rate of 67.5%, subject to the terms of the facility. The advance rate on prospective
advances will decrease to 65% once the outstanding balance under the BB&T Purchase Facility is
equal to or greater than $100.0 million but less than $110.0 million, and will further decrease to
62.5% when the outstanding balance is equal to or greater than $110.0 million.
While ownership of the receivables is transferred for legal purposes, the transfers of receivables
under the facility are accounted for as secured borrowings. Accordingly, the receivables are
reflected as assets and the associated
obligations are reflected as liabilities on our balance sheet. The BB&T Purchase Facility is
nonrecourse and is not guaranteed by Bluegreen.
85
Table of Contents
Real Estate
As of September 30, 2010, the outstanding balance on the BB&T Purchase Facility was 77.9% of the
associated collateral. Bluegreen will continue to equally share with BB&T in the excess cash flows
generated by the receivables sold, after customary payments of fees, interest and principal, until
the outstanding balance reduces to 67.5% of the existing receivables as the outstanding balance
amortizes. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Bluegreen pledged $16.5 of VOI notes
receivable under the facility and received cash proceeds of $11.2 million.
The interest rate on the BB&T Purchase Facility is currently the Prime Rate plus 3.5% (6.75% as of
September 30, 2010), but is subject to increase to the Prime Rate plus 4.5% once the outstanding
balance under the BB&T Purchase Facility is equal to or greater than $100.0 million but less than
$110.0 million, and will further increase to the Prime Rate plus 5.5% when the outstanding balance
is equal to or greater than $110.0 million.
On September 2, 2010, Bluegreen repaid $24.3 million of the outstanding balance under the BB&T
Purchase Facility with the proceeds generated from the sale of the notes in connection with the
Legacy Securitization transaction described below. During the nine months ended September 30,
2010, Bluegreen repaid a total of $49.0 million on the facility.
The outstanding balance and availability under the BB&T Purchase Facility as of September 30, 2010
is approximately $93.5 million and $31.5 million, respectively.
Liberty Bank Facility. Bluegreen has a $75.0 million revolving timeshare receivables hypothecation
facility with a syndicate of lenders led by Liberty Bank and assembled by Wellington Financial.
The facility provided for a 90% advance on eligible receivables pledged under the facility. Amounts
borrowed under the facility and interest incurred will be repaid as cash is collected on the
pledged receivables, with the remaining balance, if any, due on August 27, 2014.
On September 27, 2010, this facility was amended to reinstate and extend the revolving advance
period to November 26, 2010. Additionally, through November 26, 2010, the interest rate on amounts
outstanding under the facility increased from one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus
2.5%, subject to a floor of 5.75%, to the Prime Rate plus 2.25%, subject to a floor of 6.5% (6.5%
as of September 30, 2010). Bluegreen is currently in discussions with Liberty Bank regarding the
extension of the advance period under this facility for an additional two years but there is no
assurance that such extension will be obtained on favorable terms, if at all. If the advance period
is not further extended by November 26, 2010, the interest rate charged on outstanding amounts will
revert back to one-month LIBOR plus 2.5%, subject to a floor of 5.75%.
As the facility is revolving, availability under the facility increases up to the $75.0 million
facility limit as cash is received on the VOI notes receivable collateralized under the facility
and Liberty Bank is repaid through the expiration of the advance period, pursuant to the terms of
the facility.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Bluegreen pledged $27.6 million of VOI notes
receivable to this facility and received cash proceeds of $26.9 million. Bluegreen also repaid
$14.3 million on the facility during the first nine months of 2010.
The outstanding balance and availability under the Liberty Bank Facility as of September 30, 2010
is approximately $71.6 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
Other Outstanding Receivable-Backed Notes Payable
Bluegreen has outstanding obligations under various receivable-backed credit facilities that have
no remaining future availability as the advance periods have expired. Bluegreen had the following
outstanding balances under such credit facilities as of September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
86
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Balance as of | Borrowing Rate; Rate | |||||||
September 30, | Borrowing | as of September 30, | ||||||
2010 | Maturity | 2010 | ||||||
The GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Facility |
$ | 25,964 | April 16, 2016 | 30 day LIBOR+1.75%; 2.01% | ||||
Wells Fargo Facility |
3,740 | December 31, 2010 | Prime + 0.50%; 4.00% (1) | |||||
The RFA Receivables Facility |
3,637 | February 15, 2015 | 30 day LIBOR+4.00%; 4.26% | |||||
National Bank of Arizona Receivables Facility |
20,000 | September 30, 2017 | 30 day LIBOR + 5.25%; 6.75% | |||||
Legacy Securitization |
24,375 | September 2, 2025 | 12%(2) | |||||
Non-recourse Securitization Debt |
350,488 | Varies | Varies | |||||
$ | 428,204 | |||||||
(1) | Interest charged on this facility is variable and is subject to a 4.00% floor. | |
(2) | Legacy Securitization debt bears interest at a coupon rate of 12% and was issued at a discount resulting in an effective yield of 18.5%. |
The GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Facility. The Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture has a $45.0 million
revolving VOI receivables credit facility with GE (the GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Receivables
Facility). Bluegreen Corporation has guaranteed the full payment and performance of the
Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture in connection with the GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Receivables
Facility. All outstanding borrowings are scheduled to mature no later than April 16, 2016. The
facility includes affirmative, negative and financial covenants and events of default. All
principal and interest payments received on pledged receivables are applied to principal and
interest due under the facility. During the nine months ended September 30 2010, Bluegreen repaid
$6.9 million on this facility.
The Wells Fargo Facility. Bluegreen has a credit facility with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC
(Wells Fargo). Historically, Bluegreen primarily used this facility for borrowings
collateralized by the pledge of certain VOI receivables which typically have been our one-year term
receivables. The borrowing period for advances on eligible receivables expired on December 31,
2009, and the maturity date of all borrowings is scheduled to mature on December 31, 2010. The
interest rate charged on outstanding receivable borrowings under the facility is the greater of
4.00% or the Prime Rate plus 0.50%. All principal and interest payments received on pledged
receivables are applied to principal and interest due under the facility. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, Bluegreen repaid $10.7 million on this facility.
National Bank of Arizona Receivables Facility. On September 30, 2010, Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint
Venture entered into a $20.0 million timeshare receivables hypothecation facility with National
Bank of Arizona. Bluegreen Corporation has guaranteed the full payment and performance of
Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture in connection with this facility. The facility provided for an
85% advance on $23.5 million of eligible receivables, all of which were pledged under the facility
at closing, subject to terms and conditions which we believe to be customary for facilities of this
type. All principal and interest payments received on pledged receivables are applied to principal
and interest due under the facility, with the remaining balance due in September 2017. Indebtedness
under this facility bears interest at the 30-day LIBOR plus 5.25%, subject to a floor of 6.75%
(6.75% as of September 30, 2010).
Legacy Securitization. On September 2, 2010, Bluegreen completed a securitization transaction of
the lowest FICO®-score loans previously financed in the BB&T Purchase Facility. Substantially all
of the timeshare receivables included in this transaction were generated prior to December 15,
2008, the date that Bluegreen implemented its FICO® score-based credit underwriting program, and
had FICO® scores below 600.
87
Table of Contents
Real Estate
In this private placement transaction, BXG Legacy 2010 LLC, a wholly-owned special purpose
subsidiary of Bluegreen, issued $27.0 million of notes payable secured by a portfolio of timeshare
receivables totaling $36.1 million (the Legacy Securitization). While the notes payable have a
coupon rate of 12%, they were sold at a $2.7 million discount to yield an effective rate of 18.5%.
The notes payable generated gross proceeds to Bluegreen of $24.3 million (before fees and customary
reserves and expenses), which was used to repay a portion of the outstanding balance under the BB&T
Purchase Facility.
Bluegreen guaranteed the principal payments for defaulted vacation ownership loans in the Legacy
Securitization at amounts equivalent to the then-current advance rate inherent in the notes, any
shortfalls in monthly interest distributions to the Legacy Securitization investors and any
shortfall in the ultimate principal payment on the notes upon their stated maturity in September
2025.
Receivable-Backed Notes Payable Previously Reported as Off-Balance-Sheet Non-Recourse
Securitization Debt
See Note 15 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to
the debt obligations that were previously reported off-balance-sheet.
Other Effective Receivable Capacity. Pursuant to the terms of certain of our prior term
securitizations and similar type transactions, we have the ability to substitute new eligible VOI
notes receivable into such facilities in the event receivables that were previously sold in such
transactions default or are the subject of an owner upgrade transaction, subject to certain
limitations. These substitutions result in us receiving additional cash through the monthly
distribution on our retained interest in notes receivable sold. Bluegreen intends to continue to
use this receivable capacity, to the extent possible under the terms and conditions of the
applicable facilities.
Credit Facilities for Bluegreen Inventories without Existing Future Availability
Bluegreen has an outstanding obligations under various credit facilities and other notes payable
collateralized by its Resorts or Communities inventories. As of September 30, 2010 these included
the following significant items (in thousands):
Balance as of | ||||||||
September 30, | Borrowing | Borrowing Rate; Rate as of | ||||||
2010 | Maturity (1) | September 30, 2010 | ||||||
The RFA AD&C Facility |
$ | 63,861 | Varies by loan (2) | 30 day LIBOR+4.50%; 4.76% |
||||
The H4BG Communities
Facility |
33,117 | December 31, 2012 | Prime + 2.00%; 10.00% |
|||||
The Textron AD&C Loans |
10,699 | Varies by loan (2) | Prime + 1.25 - 1.50%; 4.50% 4.75% |
|||||
Wells Fargo Term Loan |
33,576 | April 30, 2012 | 30 day LIBOR + 6.87%; 7.13% |
|||||
$ | 141,253 | |||||||
(1) | Repayment of the outstanding amount is effected through release payments as the related collateral is sold, subject to periodic minimum required amortization between September 30, 2010 and maturity. | |
(2) | The maturity dates for this facility vary by loan as discussed below. |
The RFA AD&C Facility.. This facility was used to finance the acquisition and development of
certain of Bluegreens resorts and currently has two outstanding project loans. The maturity date
for the project loan collateralized by Bluegreen Club 36TM resort in Las Vegas, Nevada
(the Club 36 Loan) is June 30, 2012. Approximately $61.4 million was outstanding on this loan as
of September 30, 2010. The maturity date for the project loan collateralized by our Fountains
resort in Orlando, Florida (the Fountains Loans) is March 31, 2011. Approximately $2.5 million
was outstanding on this loan as of September 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2010,
Bluegreen had no availability under this facility. During the nine months ended September 30,
2010, Bluegreen repaid $23.6 million on this facility.
88
Table of Contents
Real Estate
The H4BG Communities Facility. Bluegreen has an outstanding balance under a credit facility (the
H4BG Communities Facility) historically used to finance our Bluegreen Communities real estate
acquisitions and development activities. The H4BG Communities Facility is secured by the real
property homesites (and personal property related thereto) at the following Bluegreen Communities
projects (the Secured Projects): Havenwood at Hunters Crossing (New Braunfels, Texas); The
Bridges at Preston Crossings (Grayson County, Texas); King Oaks (College Station, Texas); Vintage
Oaks at the Vineyard (New Braunfels, Texas); and Sanctuary Cove at St. Andrews Sound (Waverly,
Georgia). In addition, the H4BG Communities Facility is secured by our golf courses: The Bridges
at Preston Crossings (Grayson County, Texas) and Sanctuary Cove (Waverly, Georgia).
The interest rate on the H4BG Communities Facility is the Prime Rate plus 2%, subject to the
following floors: (1) 10% until the balance of the loan is reduced to $32.6 million, (2) 8% until
the balance of the loan is less than or equal to $20 million, and (3) 6% thereafter. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, Bluegreen repaid $5.4 million on this facility.
Textron AD&C Loans. Bluegreen has two acquisition loans with Textron Financial Corporation
(Textron) with no future borrowing capacity. The loan used to acquire and develop Bluegreens
Odyssey Dells resort in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin (the Odyssey Loan) had an outstanding balance
as of September 30, 2010 of approximately $5.0 million. The final maturity of outstanding
borrowings under the Odyssey Loan is December 31, 2011.
The outstanding balance on the loan used to acquire Bluegreens Atlantic Palace Resort in Atlantic
City, New Jersey (the Atlantic Palace Loan) was $5.7 million as of September 30, 2010. The final
maturity of outstanding borrowings under the Atlantic Palace Loan is April 30, 2013.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Bluegreen repaid a total of $2.1 million to
Textron under these loans.
The Wells Fargo Term Loan. On April 30, 2010, Bluegreen entered into a definitive agreement with
Wells Fargo, which amended, restated and consolidated our notes payable to Wachovia and the
line-of-credit issued by Wachovia into a single term loan with Wells Fargo (the Wells Fargo Term
Loan). The notes payable and line of credit which were consolidated into the Wells Fargo Term
Loan had a total outstanding balance of $36.4 million as of April 30, 2010. In connection with the
closing of the Wells Fargo Term Loan, Bluegreen made a principal payment of $0.4 million, reducing
the balance to $36.0 million, and paid accrued interest on the then-existing Wachovia debt.
Principal payments are effected through agreed-upon release prices as real estate collateralizing
the Wells Fargo Term Loan is sold, subject to minimum remaining required amortization as of
September 30, 2010, of $2.8 million in 2010, $10.6 million in 2011 and $20.2 million in 2012. In
addition to the resort projects previously pledged as collateral for the various notes payable to
Wachovia, Bluegreen pledged additional timeshare interests, resorts real estate, and the residual
interests in certain of its sold VOI notes receivable as collateral for the Wells Fargo Term Loan.
Wells Fargo has the right to receive, as additional collateral, the residual interest in one future
transaction which creates such a retained interest. The Wells Fargo Term Loan bears interest at the
30-day LIBOR plus 6.87% (7.13% as of September 30, 2010).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Bluegreen repaid $2.8 million on this facility.
Commitments
Bluegreens material commitments as of September 30, 2010 included the required payments due
on its receivable-backed debt, lines-of-credit and other notes payable, commitments to complete its
Bluegreen Resorts and Communities projects based on its sales contracts with customers and
commitments under noncancelable operating leases.
89
Table of Contents
Real Estate
The following table summarizes the contractual minimum principal payments required on all of
Bluegreens outstanding debt (including its receivable-backed debt, lines-of-credit and other notes
and debentures payable) and its noncancelable operating leases by period date, as of September 30,
2010 (in thousands):
Purchase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounting | Less than | 13 - 36 | 37 - 60 | More than | ||||||||||||||||||||
Category | Total | Adjustments | 12 Months | Months | Months | 60 Months | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt obligations |
$ | 793,716 | (57,632 | ) | 35,946 | 111,921 | 76,011 | 627,470 | ||||||||||||||||
Noncancelable operating leases |
61,754 | | 9,931 | 14,008 | 10,140 | 27,675 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total obligations |
$ | 855,470 | (57,632 | ) | 45,877 | 125,929 | 86,151 | 655,145 | ||||||||||||||||
Bluegreen intends to use cash flow from operations, including cash received from the
sale/pledge of VOI notes receivable, and cash received from new borrowings under existing or future
debt facilities in order to satisfy the principal payments required on contractual obligations.
While this may not prove to be the case, Bluegreen believes that it will continue to be successful
in renewing certain receivable-backed credit facilities. Based on the factors described above and
the expected positive impact on Bluegreens financial position of the strategic initiatives
implemented in the fourth quarter of 2008, Bluegreen believes that it will be in a position to meet
required debt payments when it expects them to be ultimately due, however there can be no assurance
that this will be the case.
Bluegreen estimates that the cash required to complete resort buildings, resort amenities and
other common costs in projects in which sales have occurred was approximately $1.0 million as of
September 30, 2010. Bluegreen estimates that the cash required to complete development of
communities in which sales have occurred was approximately $8.2 million as of September 30, 2010.
These amounts assume that Bluegreen is not obligated to develop any building, project or amenity in
which a commitment has not been made pursuant to a sales contract with a customer; however,
Bluegreen anticipates that it will incur such obligations in the future. Bluegreen plans to fund
these expenditures over the next three to ten years, primarily with cash generated from operations.
There is no assurance that Bluegreen will be able to generate the cash from operations necessary to
complete these commitments or that actual costs will not exceed the amounts estimated.
Bluegreen believes that its existing cash, anticipated cash generated from operations,
anticipated future permitted borrowings under existing or proposed credit facilities and
anticipated future sales of notes receivable under the purchase facilities and one or more
replacement facilities it intends to put in place will be sufficient to meet its anticipated
working capital, capital expenditures and debt service requirements for the foreseeable future,
subject to the successful implementation of ongoing strategic initiatives and receivable-backed
credit facility extensions discussed above and the ongoing availability of credit. Bluegreen will
continue its efforts to renew or replace any credit and receivables purchase facilities that have
expired or that will expire in the near term. Bluegreen will, in the future, also require
additional credit facilities or will be required to issue corporate debt or equity securities. Any
debt incurred or issued by Bluegreen may be secured or unsecured, bear fixed or variable rate
interest and may be subject to such terms as the lender may require and management believes
acceptable. There can be no assurance that the credit facilities or receivables purchase facilities
which have expired or which are scheduled to expire in the near term will be renewed or replaced or
that sufficient funds will be available from operations or under existing, proposed or future
revolving credit or other borrowing arrangements or receivables purchase facilities to meet
Bluegreens cash needs, including its debt service obligations. To the extent Bluegreen is not able
to sell notes receivable or borrow under such facilities; its ability to satisfy its obligations
would be materially adversely affected.
Bluegreens credit facilities, indentures, and other outstanding debt instruments, and
receivables purchase facilities include, what Bluegreen believes to be, customary conditions to
funding, eligibility requirements for collateral, cross-default and other acceleration provisions,
certain financial and other affirmative and negative covenants, including, among others, limits on
the incurrence of indebtedness, the repurchase of securities, payment of dividends, investments in
joint ventures and other restricted payments, the incurrence of liens, and transactions with
affiliates, as well as covenants concerning net worth, fixed charge coverage requirements,
debt-to-equity ratios, portfolio performance requirements, cash balances and events of default or
termination. No assurance can be given that Bluegreen will not be required to seek waivers of such
covenants, that it will be successful in obtaining waivers, or that such covenants will not limit
its ability to raise funds, sell receivables, satisfy or refinance its obligations or otherwise
adversely affect its operations. Further, although Bluegreen does not currently believe that any
such transactions are likely to be structured so as to materially limit its ability to pay cash
dividends on its common stock
90
Table of Contents
Real Estate
or its ability to repurchase shares in the near term; there is no assurance this will remain
true in the future. In addition, Bluegreens future operating performance and ability to meet its
financial obligations will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and
other factors, many of which will be beyond Bluegreens control.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Bluegreen historically monetized its notes receivables through various facilities and through
periodic term securitization transactions and other similar arrangements, many of which were
accounted for as sales of notes receivable under the accounting requirements in effect at the time.
As discussed further in Note 2 of our Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, on
January 1, 2010, Bluegreen adopted accounting rules that required it to consolidate seven existing
special purpose finance entities associated with prior securitization transactions that previously
qualified for off-balance sheet sales treatment. Accordingly, as of September 30, 2010, Bluegreen
does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
91
Table of Contents
Financial Services
The Financial Services activities of BFC are comprised of the operations of BankAtlantic
Bancorp and its subsidiaries. BankAtlantic Bancorp currently presents its results in two reportable
segments and its results of operations are consolidated in BFC Financial Corporation. The only
assets available to BFC Financial Corporation from BankAtlantic Bancorp are dividends when and if
paid by BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic Bancorp is a separate public company and its management
prepared the following discussion regarding BankAtlantic Bancorp which was included in BankAtlantic
Bancorps Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, references to we, us or our in the following
discussion under the caption Financial Services are references to BankAtlantic Bancorp and its
subsidiaries, and are not references to BFC Financial Corporation.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Consolidated Results of Operations
Loss from continuing operations from each of BankAtlantic Bancorps reportable segments was as
follows (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
BankAtlantic |
$ | (17,669 | ) | (35,304 | ) | 17,635 | ||||||
Parent Company |
(7,515 | ) | (16,784 | ) | 9,269 | |||||||
Net loss |
$ | (25,184 | ) | (52,088 | ) | 26,904 | ||||||
For the Three Months September 30, 2010 Compared to the Same 2009 Period:
The decrease in BankAtlantics net loss during the 2010 third quarter compared to the same
2009 quarter primarily resulted from a $29.2 million decrease in the provision for loan losses
partially offset by $4.6 million of lower revenues from service charges on deposits, $5.3 million
of lower gains on securities activities, net, a $2.4 million decline in net interest income and
$0.7 million of higher non-interest expenses. The substantial decrease in the provision for loan
losses primarily related to a significant reduction in charge-offs in all of our loan product types
as we believe that real estate value declines have slowed. The lower revenues from service
charges reflect a decline in the total number of accounts which incurred overdraft fees and a
decrease in the frequency of overdrafts per deposit account. We believe that the decline in the
number of accounts incurring overdraft fees is the result of both our focus on seeking to attract
customers who maintain deposit accounts with higher balances, the adoption of new Federal Reserve
overdraft rules and the result of a change in customer behavior. During the three months ended
September 30, 2009, BankAtlantic sold agency securities for a $4.8 million gain. No agency
securities were sold during the three months ended September 30, 2010. The decline in
BankAtlantics net interest income primarily resulted from lower earning asset balances, higher
non-performing asset balances, and an increase in liquidity resulting in additional cash balances
invested in low yielding investments. The decline in earning assets was the result of lower loan
originations and purchases, reduced acquisitions of tax certificates and sales of agency securities
since the second quarter of 2009. The increases in BankAtlantics non-interest expenses primarily
resulted from $4.5 million of impairments on assets transferred to held-for-sale in connection with
the possible sale of our Tampa operations, $2.0 million of employee severance associated with a
July 2010 workforce reduction, a $1.1 million increase in lease termination liability and a $2.2
million increase in professional fees. The above increases in non-interest expenses were partially
offset by lower compensation and occupancy expenses associated with efforts to increase operating
efficiencies and $5.4 million of costs associated with debt redemptions in 2009 with no costs
associated with debt redemptions in 2010.
The decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys loss for the 2010 quarter compared to
the same 2009 quarter primarily resulted from a $9.9 million decline in the provision for loan
losses. The substantial improvement in the provision for loan losses reflects lower charge-offs and
declines in the specific valuation allowance for loan losses for the 2010 quarter compared to the
same 2009 period.
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Change | |||||||||
BankAtlantic |
$ | (74,668 | ) | $ | (100,071 | ) | $ | 25,403 | ||||
Parent Company |
(22,287 | ) | (36,985 | ) | 14,698 | |||||||
Net loss |
$ | (96,955 | ) | $ | (137,056 | ) | $ | 40,101 | ||||
92
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Same 2009 Period:
The decrease in BankAtlantics net loss during the 2010 period compared to the same 2009
period primarily resulted from a $33.0 million reduction in the provision for loan losses, a $19.8
million reduction in non-interest expenses partially offset by a decline in net interest income of
$7.8 million, $12.0 million of lower revenues from service charges on deposits and a $8.3 million
decline in gains from securities activities, net. The improvement in non-interest expense reflects
a $9.2 million goodwill impairment charge during the 2009 period with no goodwill impairment
charges during the 2010 period. Additionally, the improvement in non-interest expenses since the
2009 period reflects reduced operating expenses associated with operating expense initiatives,
which included a $5.9 million reduction in employee compensation and benefits expense from the
consolidation of certain back-office facilities.
The decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys net loss primarily resulted from the
same items discussed above for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same 2009
period, as the provision for loan losses declined $14.6 million in the nine month period ended
September 30, 2010 compared to the same 2009 period. During the nine months ended September 30,
2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company sold certain real estate owned property for a $0.6
million loss and recorded $0.8 million of write-downs on real estate owned due to declining
property values subsequent to foreclosure.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized $3.7 million of
earnings in discontinued operations relating to additional Ryan Beck contingent earn-out payments
under the Ryan Beck merger agreement with Stifel net of a $0.5 million indemnification obligation.
93
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantic Results of Operations
Net interest income
Average Balance Sheet - Yield / Rate Analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Revenue/ | Yield/ | Average | Revenue/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 3,485,826 | 38,299 | 4.39 | $ | 4,066,363 | 44,968 | 4.42 | ||||||||||||||||
Investments |
748,289 | 6,032 | 3.22 | 616,086 | 8,700 | 5.65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest earning assets |
4,234,115 | 44,331 | 4.19 | % | 4,682,449 | 53,668 | 4.58 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles |
15,028 | 16,297 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest earning assets |
255,074 | 276,551 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 4,504,217 | $ | 4,975,297 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings |
$ | 444,981 | 250 | 0.22 | % | $ | 431,516 | 367 | 0.34 | % | ||||||||||||||
NOW |
1,484,558 | 1,441 | 0.39 | 1,237,459 | 1,930 | 0.62 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money market |
404,406 | 551 | 0.54 | 392,344 | 642 | 0.65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
689,664 | 2,635 | 1.52 | 1,175,821 | 6,480 | 2.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing deposits |
3,023,609 | 4,877 | 0.64 | 3,237,140 | 9,419 | 1.15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowed funds |
36,885 | 12 | 0.13 | 47,186 | 15 | 0.13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
106,685 | 106 | 0.39 | 410,628 | 2,494 | 2.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
22,000 | 235 | 4.24 | 22,737 | 255 | 4.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
3,189,179 | 5,230 | 0.65 | 3,717,691 | 12,183 | 1.30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
907,272 | 808,802 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing other liabilities |
56,525 | 63,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
4,152,976 | 4,590,363 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
351,241 | 384,934 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
$ | 4,504,217 | $ | 4,975,297 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income/net interest spread |
$ | 39,101 | 3.54 | % | 41,485 | 3.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Margin |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income/interest earning assets |
4.19 | % | 4.58 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense/interest earning assets |
0.49 | 1.04 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin |
3.70 | % | 3.54 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Same 2009 Period:
The decrease in net interest income primarily resulted from a significant reduction in earning
assets and an increase in additional cash balances invested in low yielding investments partially
offset by an improvement in the net interest spread and margin driven by lower deposit and funding
costs.
The average balance of earning assets declined by $448.3 million during the three months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to the same 2009 period. This decline in interest earning assets
significantly reduced our net interest income. The decline in average earning assets reflects a
management decision to slow the origination and purchase of loans, sell agency securities and
reduce the purchase of tax certificates in an effort to enhance liquidity and improve regulatory
capital ratios. BankAtlantic also experienced significant residential loan repayments due to
normal loan amortization as well as a significant amount of loan refinancings associated with low
residential mortgage interest rates during 2009 and the first nine months of 2010. The reduction
in earning assets was partially offset by the purchase of short-term agency and municipal
securities that are eligible as collateral for borrowings in order to earn higher yields than
interest earning cash balances.
The net interest spread and margin improved due to a change in our interest bearing liability
funding mix. BankAtlantic used the funds from the reduction in assets to repay FHLB advances and
short term wholesale
94
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
borrowings. Additionally, the low interest rate environment resulted in a
significant reduction in certificate of deposit balances with a corresponding migration of
customers to NOW and demand deposit transaction accounts
that generally have lower interest costs than certificate of deposits. As a result,
BankAtlantics funding mix changed from higher rate FHLB advances and certificates of deposits to
lower rate deposits which resulted in a substantial reduction in BankAtlantics cost of funds.
Also contributing to the reduction in BankAtlantics cost of funds was the substantial decline
in deposit interest rates in the industry. This improvement in the cost of funds was partially
offset by interest earning asset yield declines and significantly increased balances in low
yielding investments. The decline in average yields on loans reflects lower interest rates during
2010 compared to 2009 and higher non-performing loan balances. Investments primarily consisted of
agency mortgage-backed securities, interest bearing deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank,
short-term municipal securities and tax certificates. The significant decline in investment
yields during the 2010 third quarter compared to the 2009 third quarter resulted from an increase
of approximately $190.8 million in cash balances and in accounts yielding less than 25 basis
points. The net interest spread and margin were favorably impacted by a significant increase in
transaction accounts with a corresponding reduction in certificate of deposit accounts. A portion
of maturing certificates of deposit accounts either transferred to transaction accounts or renewed
at substantially lower interest rates. The higher transaction account balances reflect the
migration of retail certificate of deposit accounts to transaction accounts and new customer
accounts. Transaction account growth was also favorably impacted by a shift in our sales and
marketing strategy to seek potential customers who maintain higher deposit balances.
Average Balance Sheet - Yield / Rate Analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Revenue/ | Yield/ | Average | Revenue/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 3,608,848 | 119,717 | 4.42 | 4,215,306 | 142,159 | 4.50 | |||||||||||||||||
Investments |
667,397 | 15,600 | 3.12 | 759,671 | 30,908 | 5.42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest earning assets |
4,276,245 | 135,317 | 4.22 | % | 4,974,977 | 173,067 | 4.64 | |||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles |
15,342 | 19,593 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest earning assets |
290,558 | 309,682 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 4,582,145 | 5,304,252 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings |
$ | 438,707 | 855 | 0.26 | % | 441,270 | 1,258 | 0.38 | ||||||||||||||||
NOW |
1,492,442 | 5,444 | 0.49 | 1,148,733 | 5,155 | 0.60 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money market |
384,024 | 1,810 | 0.63 | 408,656 | 2,089 | 0.68 | ||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
796,375 | 9,846 | 1.65 | 1,243,603 | 25,431 | 2.73 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits |
3,111,548 | 17,955 | 0.77 | 3,242,262 | 33,933 | 1.40 | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowed funds |
36,633 | 35 | 0.13 | 129,487 | 223 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
93,410 | 1,065 | 1.52 | 644,516 | 14,740 | 3.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
22,167 | 694 | 4.19 | 22,778 | 839 | 4.92 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
3,263,758 | 19,749 | 0.81 | 4,039,043 | 49,735 | 1.65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
896,080 | 798,390 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing other liabilities |
55,266 | 62,751 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
4,215,104 | 4,900,184 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
367,041 | 404,068 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 4,582,145 | 5,304,252 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest
income/net interest spread |
$ | 115,568 | 3.41 | % | $ | 123,332 | 2.99 | |||||||||||||||||
Margin |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income/interest earning assets |
4.22 | % | 4.64 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense/interest earning assets |
0.62 | 1.34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin |
3.60 | % | 3.30 | |||||||||||||||||||||
95
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Same 2009 Period:
The decrease in net interest income was primarily the result of the items discussed above for
the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same 2009 period. The lower net interest
income during the 2010 period compared to the same 2009 period primarily resulted from a
significant decline in earning assets partially offset by improvements in the net interest spread
and the net interest margin as interest rates on interest-bearing liabilities declined more than
yields on interest-earning assets. The significant decline in interest rates on interest-bearing
liabilities reflects lower deposit interest rates for the 2010 period compared to the 2009 period
as well as a shift in our funding mix. During 2010, our deposit funding mix shifted from higher
cost certificates of deposit to lower cost transaction accounts. Additionally, proceeds from the
decline in earning assets were utilized to repay FHLB advance borrowings which further reduced our
cost of funds during the 2010 period.
Asset Quality
The activity in BankAtlantics allowance for loan losses was as follows (in thousands):
For The Three Months | For Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 180,635 | 156,821 | 173,588 | 125,572 | |||||||||||
Charge-offs |
||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
(4,619 | ) | (7,174 | ) | (14,033 | ) | (15,685 | ) | ||||||||
Commercial real estate |
(5,969 | ) | (21,541 | ) | (41,447 | ) | (37,636 | ) | ||||||||
Commercial business |
| | | (516 | ) | |||||||||||
Consumer |
(9,881 | ) | (12,490 | ) | (32,474 | ) | (31,929 | ) | ||||||||
Small business |
(2,402 | ) | (2,249 | ) | (5,464 | ) | (7,367 | ) | ||||||||
Total Charge-offs |
(22,871 | ) | (43,454 | ) | (93,418 | ) | (93,133 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries of loans
previously charged-off |
984 | 362 | 2,910 | 1,815 | ||||||||||||
Net (charge-offs) |
(21,887 | ) | (43,092 | ) | (90,508 | ) | (91,318 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
23,012 | 52,246 | 98,680 | 131,721 | ||||||||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 181,760 | 165,975 | 181,760 | 165,975 | |||||||||||
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic recognized $1.3 million
and $3.2 million of charge-offs related to builder land bank loans and land acquisition and
development loans, respectively. The remaining $1.4 million of commercial real estate loan
charge-offs were primarily associated with commercial non-residential real estate loans. During
the three months ended September 30, 2009, the majority of the commercial loan charge-offs resulted
from one builder land bank loan and one shopping center loan.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic recognized $21.9 million of
charge-offs related to builder land bank loans including a $13.5 million charge-off related to one
builder land bank loan that was sold during the period. Additionally, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic recognized $9.4 of residential land acquisition and development
loan charge-offs including a $3.4 million charge-off on a $20 million sale of our loan
participation interest at a discount to the lead lender. Commercial residential loans continue to
constitute the majority of commercial real estate loan charge-offs; however, BankAtlantic is
experiencing certain unfavorable credit quality trends in commercial loans collateralized by
commercial land and retail income producing properties and may experience higher non-performing
loans and charge-offs in these loan categories in future periods. BankAtlantic does not have plans
to originate or purchase commercial real estate loans in the foreseeable future.
The decrease in consumer and residential loan charge-offs reflect improved delinquency trends;
however if economic conditions do not improve we may experience higher non-accrual loans and credit
losses in these portfolios.
96
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The decrease in the provision for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2010
compared to the same 2009 period primarily resulted from lower charge-offs and a decline in
additions to specific valuation allowances on commercial real estate loans.
The decrease in the provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
compared to the same 2009 period reflect lower loan portfolio balances and an improvement in
residential and consumer loan delinquency and loss migration trends during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
Unemployment rates nationally and in Florida were 9.6% and 11.9%, respectively, at September
30, 2010. There is no assurance that the credit quality of our loan portfolio will improve in
subsequent periods and if general economic conditions do not improve in Florida and nationwide, the
credit quality of our loan portfolio may continue to deteriorate and additional provisions for loan
losses will be required.
At the indicated dates, BankAtlantics non-performing assets and potential problem loans
(contractually past due 90 days or more, performing impaired loans or troubled debt restructured
loans) were (in thousands):
As of | ||||||||
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
NONPERFORMING ASSETS |
||||||||
Tax certificates |
$ | 2,761 | 2,161 | |||||
Commercial real estate |
275,057 | 167,867 | ||||||
Consumer |
13,282 | 14,451 | ||||||
Small business |
10,995 | 9,338 | ||||||
Residential real estate (1) |
87,563 | 76,401 | ||||||
Commercial business |
17,190 | 18,063 | ||||||
Total nonaccrual assets (2) |
$ | 406,848 | 288,281 | |||||
Residential real estate owned |
$ | 11,962 | 9,607 | |||||
Commercial real estate owned |
43,571 | 25,442 | ||||||
Small business real estate owned |
2,126 | 580 | ||||||
Consumer real estate owned |
358 | 306 | ||||||
Other repossessed assets |
| 10 | ||||||
Total repossessed assets |
58,017 | 35,945 | ||||||
Total nonperforming assets, net |
$ | 464,865 | 324,226 | |||||
Allowances |
||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
$ | 181,760 | 173,588 | |||||
Allowance for tax certificate losses |
8,452 | 6,781 | ||||||
Total allowances |
$ | 190,212 | 180,369 | |||||
POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS |
||||||||
Contractually past due 90 days or more (3) |
$ | 13,083 | 9,960 | |||||
Performing impaired loans (4) |
7,999 | 6,150 | ||||||
Troubled debt restructured (5) |
110,219 | 107,642 | ||||||
TOTAL POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS |
$ | 131,301 | 123,752 | |||||
(1) | Includes $41.9 million and $41.3 million of interest-only residential loans as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. | |
(2) | Includes $121.4 million and $45.7 million of troubled debt restructured loans as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. | |
(3) | The majority of these loans have matured and the borrower continues to make payments under the matured loan agreement or the loan has sufficient collateral that we believe is sufficient to prevent a loss. | |
(4) | BankAtlantic believes that it will ultimately collect the principal and interest associated with these loans. | |
(5) | These loans are performing in accordance with the loans modified terms. | |
Non-performing assets were higher at September 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009 primarily due to a $118.6 million increase in non-accrual loans and a $22.1 million increase in real estate owned. |
97
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The increase in non-accrual loans at September 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009
primarily resulted from a substantial increase in commercial real estate non-accrual loans.
Commercial loans transferred to non-accrual were primarily collateralized by non-residential
properties. At September 30, 2010, $82.4 million of non-accrual commercial real estate loans were
current as to their payment terms. However, there is no assurance that these loans will
subsequently return to an accruing status.
The increase in residential non-accrual loans was primarily the result of a prolonged
foreclosure process. Residential loan delinquencies excluding non-accrual loans have declined from
$26.7 million at December 31, 2009 to $17.9 million at September 30, 2010; however, the foreclosure
processes vary by state and can currently take more than 15 months to complete. We believe that
the lower delinquencies excluding non-accrual loans may result in lower new non-accrual residential
loan balances in the future; however, we anticipate higher residential real estate owned balances
in subsequent periods as non-accrual loans continue through the foreclosure process.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, small business loan delinquencies and
charge-offs slightly increased. Small business loans have performed better than our commercial
real estate loans in the current environment; however, if the current economic trends continue,
including elevated unemployment rates in Florida, we anticipate that we may experience an increase
in charge-offs and non-accrual small business loans.
The allowance for tax certificate losses at September 30, 2010 compared to December 2009
reflects the impact of adverse real estate market conditions on our out-of-state tax certificate
portfolio.
The higher balance of repossessed assets at September 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009
reflects foreclosures of commercial real estate and residential loans. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic transferred $40.7 million of loans to real estate owned.
BankAtlantic attempts to modify loans to credit-worthy borrowers; however, the majority of
BankAtlantics non-accrual commercial real estate loans are collateral dependent which leaves
BankAtlantic few viable options other than initiating the foreclosure process. As non-accrual loans
migrate into repossessed assets in the future, we expect repossessed assets to increase.
BankAtlantics potential problem loans at September 30, 2010 slightly increased compared to
December 31, 2009 primarily due to an increase in commercial real estate troubled debt restructured
loans. In response to current market conditions, BankAtlantic decided, on a case-by-case basis, to
modify loans for certain borrowers experiencing financial difficulties and has modified the terms
of certain commercial, small business, residential and consumer home equity loans. Generally, the
concessions made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties may include a variety of
modifications, including among others the reduction of contractual interest rates, forgiveness of
loan principal upon satisfactory performance under the modified terms, conversion of amortizing
loans to interest only payments or the deferral of some interest payments to the maturity date of
the loan. Loans that are not delinquent at the date of modification are generally not placed on
non-accrual. Modified non-accrual loans are generally not returned to an accruing status and
BankAtlantic does not reset days past due on delinquent modified loans until the borrower
demonstrates a sustained period of performance under the modified terms, which is generally
performance over a six month period.
BankAtlantics troubled debt restructured loans by loan type were as follows (in thousands):
As of September 30, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Non-accrual | Accruing | Non-accrual | Accruing | |||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 108,421 | 84,378 | 32,225 | 83,768 | |||||||||||
Small business |
4,250 | 9,132 | 4,520 | 7,325 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
1,829 | 13,520 | 1,744 | 12,969 | ||||||||||||
Residential |
6,874 | 3,189 | 7,178 | 3,580 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 121,374 | 110,219 | 45,667 | 107,642 | |||||||||||
98
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantics commercial loan portfolio includes large loan balance lending relationships.
Nine relationships accounted for 50.7% of our $292.2 million of non-accrual commercial real estate
loans as of September 30, 2010.
The following table outlines general information about these relationships as of September 30,
2010 (in thousands):
Unpaid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | Outstanding | Specific | Date loan | Date Placed | Default | Collateral | Date of Last | |||||||||||||||||
Relationships | Balance | Balance | Reserves | Originated | on Nonaccrual | Date (4) | Type | Full Appraisal | ||||||||||||||||
Residential Land
Developers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 1
(1) |
$ | 26,731 | 19,200 | 3,834 | Q3-2004 | Q4-2008 | Q4-2008 | Land A&D (5) | Q4-2009 | |||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 2 (2) |
12,500 | 10,064 | 1,258 | Q3-2006 | Q1-2009 | Q1-2009 | Land A&D (5) | Q1-2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 39,231 | 29,264 | 5,092 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Land
Developers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 3 |
26,210 | 26,207 | 8,902 | Q2-2006 | Q4-2009 | Q4-2009 | Land A&D (5) | Q4-2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 4 (3) |
20,389 | 20,316 | 14,972 | Q4-2003 | Q2-2010 | (3) | Commercial Land | Q2-2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 5 |
17,777 | 17,777 | 8,683 | Q3-2006 | Q1-2010 | Q1-2010 | Commercial mixed-use | Q4-2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 6 |
18,421 | 18,421 | | Q2-2007 | Q2-2010 | Q2-2010 | Commercial Land | Q2-2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 7 |
10,778 | 10,778 | 1,218 | Q3-2007 | Q4-2009 | Q3-2009 | Commercial Land | Q4-2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
93,575 | 93,499 | 33,775 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Non-Residential
Developers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 8 |
12,842 | 12,842 | 5,907 | Q3-2006 | Q3-2010 | (3) | Self Storage | Q3-2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 9 |
12,670 | 12,670 | 3,640 | Q3-2007 | Q3-2010 | (3) | Shopping Center | Q2-2010 | ||||||||||||||||
25,512 | 25,512 | 9,547 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of Large
Relationships |
158,318 | 148,275 | 48,414 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | During 2009 and 2010, BankAtlantic recognized partial charge-offs on relationship No. 1 aggregating $6.8 million. | |
(2) | During 2009 and 2010 BankAtlantic recognized partial charge-offs on relationship No. 2 of $3.4 million. | |
(3) | The loan is currently not in default. | |
(4) | The default date is defined as the date of the initial missed payment prior to default. | |
(5) | Acquisition and development (A&D). | |
(6) | Outstanding balance is the Unpaid Principal Balance less charge-offs. |
99
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The following table presents our purchased residential loans by year of origination
segregated by amortizing and interest only loans (dollars in thousands):
Amortizing Purchased Residential Loans | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | LTV at | Current | FICO Scores | Current | Amount | Debt Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year of Origination | Amount | Origination | LTV (1) | at Origination | FICO Scores (2) | Delinquent | at Origination (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 44,784 | 64.41 | % | 113.86 | % | 742 | 741 | $ | 5,562 | 32.46 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2006 |
49,976 | 70.79 | % | 121.75 | % | 734 | 721 | 4,965 | 35.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
66,823 | 73.73 | % | 118.22 | % | 725 | 715 | 11,000 | 35.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
314,573 | 68.18 | % | 82.03 | % | 734 | 727 | 20,110 | 34.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Prior to 2004 |
146,595 | 67.70 | % | 59.64 | % | 733 | 729 | 6,353 | 34.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Only Purchased Residential Loans | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | LTV at | Current | FICO Scores | Current | Amount | Debt Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year of Origination | Amount | Origination | LTV (1) | at Origination | FICO Scores (2) | Delinquent | at Origination (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 83,431 | 33.84 | % | 127.64 | % | 750 | 739 | $ | 17,095 | 34.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2006 |
189,629 | 74.05 | % | 125.09 | % | 740 | 739 | 29,903 | 34.97 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
167,543 | 70.05 | % | 114.63 | % | 740 | 747 | 6,201 | 34.36 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
80,439 | 70.41 | % | 97.54 | % | 745 | 718 | 5,322 | 31.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Prior to 2004 |
78,951 | 58.56 | % | 78.87 | % | 743 | 734 | 3,058 | 31.64 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
The following table presents our purchased residential loans by geographic area
segregated by amortizing and interest-only loans (dollars in thousands):
Amortizing Purchased Residential Loans | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | LTV at | Current | FICO Scores | Current | Amount | Debt Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||
State | Amount | Origination | LTV (1) | at Origination | FICO Scores (2) | Delinquent | at Origination (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arizona |
$ | 11,272 | 68.35 | % | 124.37 | % | 728 | 735 | $ | 1,023 | 32.93 | % | ||||||||||||||||
California |
150,468 | 68.51 | % | 87.08 | % | 738 | 736 | 11,891 | 34.99 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Florida |
87,315 | 69.59 | % | 102.37 | % | 723 | 710 | 12,506 | 35.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Nevada |
5,999 | 70.84 | % | 116.87 | % | 738 | 734 | 350 | 36.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Other States |
377,507 | 68.28 | % | 81.93 | % | 733 | 732 | 22,492 | 33.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Only Purchased Residential Loans | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | LTV at | Current | FICO Scores | Current | Amount | Debt Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||
State | Amount | Origination | LTV (1) | at Origination | FICO Scores (2) | Delinquent | at Origination (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arizona |
$ | 18,763 | 69.59 | % | 141.28 | % | 753 | 740 | $ | 2,182 | 32.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||
California |
170,890 | 70.49 | % | 107.10 | % | 742 | 732 | 22,516 | 33.83 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Florida |
36,928 | 69.47 | % | 142.33 | % | 747 | 736 | 9,823 | 32.53 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Nevada |
7,473 | 74.65 | % | 197.64 | % | 741 | 723 | 4,057 | 34.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Other States |
365,938 | 70.13 | % | 109.36 | % | 741 | 743 | 23,003 | 34.11 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Current loan-to-values (LTV) for the majority of the portfolio were obtained as of the first quarter of 2010 from automated valuation models. | |
(2) | Current FICO scores based on borrowers for which FICO scores were available as of the third quarter of 2009. | |
(3) | Debt ratio is defined as the portion of the borrowers income that goes towards debt service. |
100
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The table below presents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses (ALL) by
various loan classifications, the percent of allowance to each loan category (ALL to total loans
percent) and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans (Loans to total loans
percent). The allowance shown in the table should not
be interpreted as an indication that charge-offs in future periods will occur in these amounts
or percentages or that the allowance accurately reflects future charge-off amounts or trends
(dollars in thousands):
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
ALL | Loans | ALL | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||
to gross | by | to gross | by | |||||||||||||||||||||
ALL | loans | category | ALL | loans | category | |||||||||||||||||||
by | in each | to gross | by | in each | to gross | |||||||||||||||||||
category | category | loans | category | category | loans | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial business |
$ | 10,110 | 7.27 | % | 4.02 | % | 4,515 | 2.94 | % | 3.94 | % | |||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
100,331 | 9.42 | 30.79 | 91,658 | 7.71 | 30.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Small business |
10,921 | 3.59 | 8.79 | 7,998 | 2.56 | 8.02 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
21,970 | 1.68 | 37.88 | 27,000 | 1.74 | 39.85 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer direct |
38,427 | 6.00 | 18.52 | 42,417 | 6.14 | 17.70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total allowance for
loan losses |
$ | 181,759 | 5.25 | 100.00 | 173,588 | 4.45 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||||||
Included in the allowance for loan losses as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
were specific reserves by loan type as follows (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Commercial real estate |
$ | 78,276 | 42,523 | |||||
Commercial business |
9,110 | 174 | ||||||
Small business |
3,254 | 753 | ||||||
Consumer |
1,528 | 4,621 | ||||||
Residential |
9,769 | 8,784 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 101,937 | 56,855 | |||||
The increase in the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2010 compared to December 31,
2009 primarily resulted from the establishment of specific valuation allowances on commercial real
estate, commercial business and small business loans due to the deteriorating financial condition
of certain of our borrowers resulting in greater reliance on declining underlying collateral
values. The increase in the allowance for commercial and small business loans was partially offset
by a decline in the residential and consumer allowance for loan losses. The decline in the
consumer allowance reflects lower loan balances, the improvement of delinquency trends and
improvements in early-stage delinquency migration from one payment delinquent to two payments
delinquent. The reduction in the residential loan allowance for loan losses was primarily due to
lower loan balances, improvements in delinquency rates excluding non-accruals and improvements in
early-stage delinquency migration during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
BankAtlantics Non-Interest Income
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Change | 2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposits |
$ | 15,214 | 19,767 | (4,553 | ) | 45,764 | 57,799 | (12,035 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other service charges and fees |
7,495 | 7,355 | 140 | 22,612 | 22,439 | 173 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities activities, net |
(543 | ) | 4,774 | (5,317 | ) | 2,898 | 11,161 | (8,263 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income from
unconsolidated companies |
| 108 | (108 | ) | | 289 | (289 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
4,869 | 3,488 | 1,381 | 10,289 | 9,445 | 844 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest income |
$ | 27,035 | 35,492 | (8,457 | ) | 81,563 | 101,133 | (19,570 | ) | |||||||||||||||
101
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The lower revenues from service charges on deposits during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same 2009 periods primarily resulted from lower overdraft
fee income. This decrease in overdraft fee income reflects a decline in the total number of
accounts which incurred overdraft fees and a decrease
in the frequency of overdrafts per deposit account. We believe that the decline in the
number of accounts incurring overdraft fees reflected both our efforts to seek customers who
maintain deposit accounts with higher balances and the result of a change in customer behavior.
The Federal Reserve adopted new overdraft rules (effective July 1, 2010 for new customers and
August 15, 2010 for existing customers), which among other requirements, prohibit banks from
automatically enrolling customers in overdraft protection programs. Additionally, Congress has
established a consumer protection agency which may further limit the assessment of overdraft fees
including imposing caps on the number of overdrafts. We anticipate that these events will result
in further declines in our overdraft fee income in future periods.
The other service charges and fees remained at 2009 levels during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010. Higher interchange income from the use of check cards by our customers
was partially offset by lower fee income from our cruise ship operations. Additionally, check card
losses were $0.2 million lower during the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the
same period during 2009.
In June 2010 BankAtlantic entered into a foreign currency derivative contract as an economic
hedge of foreign currency in cruise ship ATMs and recognized a $0.5 million and $0.2 million
unrealized loss in connection with these derivative contracts during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic sold
$47.1 million of agency securities for a $3.1 million gain. The net proceeds of $43.8 million
from the sales were used to pay down FHLB advance borrowings.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, BankAtlantic sold $98.6 million
and $283.9 million of agency securities available for sale for gains of $4.8 million and $11.2
million, respectively. The $295.1 million of net proceeds from the sales were used to pay down
FHLB advance borrowings.
Income from unconsolidated companies during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009 represented equity earnings from a joint venture that engages in accounts receivable
factoring. The factoring joint venture was consolidated as of January 1, 2010 upon the
implementation of new accounting guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities.
BankAtlantic Bancorp has restricted the funding of the factoring joint venture to a maximum of $10
million.
The increase in other non-interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 compared to the same 2009 periods was primarily the result of $0.8 million and $0.2 million
of foreign currency unrealized exchange gains associated with foreign currency held in cruise
ship ATMs. Additionally, during the three months ended September 30, 2010 BankAtlantic received
$1.0 million from its on-line banking service provider as a result of business interruption issues
relating to the conversion to the service providers products. The above increases in other
non-interest income were partially offset during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 compared to the same 2009 periods by lower commissions from investment products.
102
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantics Non-Interest Expense
For the Three Months Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | 2010 | 2009 | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
$ | 22,475 | 23,917 | (1,442 | ) | 71,103 | 76,980 | (5,877 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
13,263 | 14,553 | (1,290 | ) | 40,589 | 44,305 | (3,716 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Advertising and business promotion |
1,917 | 1,514 | 403 | 5,972 | 6,141 | (169 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Professional fees |
4,942 | 2,752 | 2,190 | 11,727 | 8,032 | 3,695 | ||||||||||||||||||
Check losses |
763 | 1,146 | (383 | ) | 1,716 | 2,981 | (1,265 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Supplies and postage |
929 | 987 | (58 | ) | 2,789 | 2,978 | (189 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Telecommunication |
697 | 348 | 349 | 1,881 | 1,622 | 259 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost associated with debt redemption |
| 5,431 | (5,431 | ) | 60 | 7,463 | (7,403 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Provision (recovery) for tax
certificates |
885 | (198 | ) | 1,083 | 3,752 | 2,702 | 1,050 | |||||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of real estate |
(442 | ) | 67 | (509 | ) | 334 | (220 | ) | 554 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment of assets held for sale |
4,469 | | 4,469 | 4,469 | | 4,469 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairment of real estate held for
development and sale |
| 1,131 | (1,131 | ) | 1,511 | 1,165 | 346 | |||||||||||||||||
Impairment of real estate owned |
434 | 137 | 297 | 1,098 | 760 | 338 | ||||||||||||||||||
Lease termination costs, net |
1,093 | 383 | 710 | 1,308 | 1,684 | (376 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Employee termination costs |
2,103 | 78 | 2,025 | 2,103 | 2,024 | 79 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
| | | | 9,124 | (9,124 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
FDIC special assessment |
| | | | 2,428 | (2,428 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
7,228 | 7,786 | (558 | ) | 22,580 | 22,643 | (63 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
$ | 60,756 | 60,032 | 724 | 172,992 | 192,812 | (19,820 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
The decline in employee compensation and benefits during the three months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to the same 2009 period resulted primarily from a decline in the
workforce, lower employee benefit costs and higher than projected employee stock based
compensation forfeitures. In July 2010, BankAtlantic reduced its workforce by 105 employees, or
seven percent. Benefit costs, primarily health insurance and pension costs, were $0.2 million
lower during the 2010 quarter compared to the 2009 quarter and stock-based compensation expense
was $0.5 million lower during the 2010 quarter compared to the same 2009 quarter due to the
workforce reduction and attrition.
The substantial decline in employee compensation and benefits during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to the same 2009 period resulted primarily from the March 2009 and
July 2010 workforce reductions discussed above.. As a consequence of the work force reductions
and attrition, the number of full-time equivalent employees declined from 1,770 at December 31,
2008 to 1,357 at September 30, 2010, or a 23% reduction. Benefit costs, primarily health
insurance and pension costs, were $1.1 million lower during the 2010 nine month period compared to
the same 2009 period and stock-based compensation expense was $0.7 million lower during the 2010
nine month period compared to the same 2009 period.
The decline in occupancy and equipment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010
compared to the same 2009 periods primarily resulted from the consolidation of back-office
facilities and lower depreciation and rent expense. Depreciation expense declined by $0.6 million
and building maintenance, rent expense, real estate taxes and utilities declined by $0.7 million
during the 2010 quarter compared to the same 2009 period. Depreciation expense declined by $1.7
million and building maintenance, rent expense, real estate taxes and utilities declined by $2.0
million during the 2010 nine month period compared to the same 2009 period.
The increase in BankAtlantics advertising and business promotion expense during the 2010
quarter compared to the same 2009 period primarily resulted from promotions associated with the
launch of BankAtlantics new on-line banking platform.
Advertising and business promotion expenses remained at 2009 levels for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as the promotion costs associated with BankAtlantic on-line banking upgrade were
offset by
lower direct mail advertising as the marketing strategy focused less on direct mail
advertising and more on enhancing customer relationships.
103
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The higher professional fees during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010
compared to the same 2009 periods primarily resulted from legal and related costs in connection
with the class-action securities litigation and secondarily from legal costs associated with tax
certificate activities litigation, loan modifications and loan work-outs. Legal expenses during
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 were partially offset by $1.4 million and $4.5
million, respectively, of insurance reimbursements in connection with the class action securities
litigation. During 2010, litigation costs on cases alleging claims covered by insurance exceeded
the deductible under our director and officer liability insurance and we began receiving eligible
cost reimbursements from the insurance carrier. Insurance claim reimbursements are recognized as
a reduction to legal fees when the claim is approved by the insurance carrier. The claims under
our director and officer liability insurance are on-going and we expect to receive partial
reimbursement for litigation costs associated with the pending securities litigation in future
periods. Additionally, BankAtlantic engaged consulting firms during the third quarter of 2010 for
assistance in process improvements and efficiency initiatives as well as enhancing non-interest
income. As a consequence, consulting fees increased $0.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively,
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same 2009 periods.
The lower check losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to
the same 2009 periods were primarily related to decreases in customer overdrafts, the lower number
of new accounts as well as more stringent overdraft policies.
The decline in telecommunication expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 compared to the same 2009 periods primarily resulted from a $0.3 million reversal of a vendor
conversion liability.
The costs associated with debt redemptions during the nine months ended September 30, 2010
reflects the prepayment of a $2 million FHLB advance obligation and $0.7 million repayment of a
mortgage-backed bond that was scheduled to mature in September 2013.
The costs associated with debt redemptions during the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009 were the result of prepayment penalties on FHLB advances incurred upon the prepayment of
$315.0 million and $841.0 million, respectively, of FHLB advances. The FHLB advances redeemed had
higher interest rates than existing funding sources and were repaid to improve BankAtlantics net
interest margin.
The provision for tax certificates losses during the three and nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009 reflects charge-offs and increases in tax certificate reserves for certain
legacy out-of-state certificates in distressed markets. We have significantly reduced the
acquisition of out-of-state tax certificates and concentrate the majority of our tax certificate
acquisitions in Florida.
The recovery for tax certificates during the three months ended September 30, 2009 primarily
resulted from the extension of the redemption period of tax certificates in a particular market
which reduced the allowance for tax certificates in that market.
Loss (gain) on sale of real estate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 primarily represents gains on the sale of residential and tax certificate real estate owned.
The above gains were offset by a $1.2 million loss on the sale of a real estate project for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010. The real estate project was acquired in connection with a
financial institution acquisition during 2002.
The impairment of assets held for sale relates to a management decision to pursue a sale of
BankAtlantics Tampa operations. As a consequence, BankAtlantic reclassified its Tampa office
properties and equipment to held-for-sale and recognized a $4.5 million impairment at the transfer
date.
The impairment of real estate held for development and sale for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 reflects additional impairment charges of for real estate that was originally
acquired for branch expansion. The impairment of real estate held for development and sale for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 reflects impairments on a real estate project.
104
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
Impairment of real estate owned during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 relates primarily to foreclosed real estate acquired in connection with our tax certificate
and purchased residential loan activities.
Lease termination costs represent lease contracts, net of deferred rent reversals, originally
executed for branch expansion. BankAtlantic is currently attempting to sublease or terminate the
lease contracts and during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 recognized
additional losses associated with these operating leases as these leases are measured at fair
value.
Employee termination costs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
were the result of the workforce reductions mentioned above.
BankAtlantic tests goodwill for potential impairment annually or during interim periods if
impairment indicators exist. Based on the results of an interim impairment evaluation, BankAtlantic
recorded an impairment charge of $9.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
BankAtlantic had remaining goodwill of $13.1 million relating to its capital services reporting
unit included in its statement of condition as of September 30, 2010. BankAtlantic performed its
annual goodwill impairment test as of September 30, 2010 and determined that its goodwill
associated with its capital services reporting unit was not impaired. If market conditions do not
improve or deteriorate further, BankAtlantic may incur additional goodwill impairment charges in
future periods.
In October 2008, the FDIC adopted a restoration plan to restore its insurance fund to a
predefined level. In June 2009, the FDIC imposed a special assessment on all depository
institutions of five basis points on adjusted total assets. BankAtlantics portion of the FDIC
depository institution special assessment was $2.4 million.
The decrease in non-interest expenses during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 compared to the same 2009 periods reflects lower operating expenses due to the on-going
consolidation of back-office operations. Additionally, BankAtlantic incurred higher property
maintenance costs associated with real estate owned and non-performing loans during the 2010
period compared to the same 2009 periods.
Parent Company Results of Operations
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Change | 2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
$ | (3,792 | ) | (3,633 | ) | (159 | ) | (10,856 | ) | (11,460 | ) | 604 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan loss |
(1,398 | ) | (11,340 | ) | 9,942 | (5,038 | ) | (19,636 | ) | 14,598 | ||||||||||||||
Net interest expense
after
provision for loan
losses |
(5,190 | ) | (14,973 | ) | 9,783 | (15,894 | ) | (31,096 | ) | 15,202 | ||||||||||||||
Non-interest income |
576 | 364 | 212 | 1,545 | (149 | ) | 1,694 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expense |
2,901 | 2,175 | 726 | 7,938 | 5,740 | 2,198 | ||||||||||||||||||
Parent company loss |
$ | (7,515 | ) | (16,784 | ) | 9,269 | (22,287 | ) | (36,985 | ) | 14,698 | |||||||||||||
Net interest expense increased during the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared
to the same 2009 period as a result of higher average debenture balances. The average balances on
junior subordinated debentures increased from $302.0 million during the three months ended
September 30, 2009 to $315.7 million during the same 2010 period. The increase in average
debenture balances resulted from the deferral of interest which began in March 2009. Average
interest rates on subordinated debentures increased from 4.88% for the three months ended September
30, 2009 to 4.90% for the same 2010 period. Also included in net interest expense during the three
months ended September 30, 2010 was $60,000 of interest income on two performing loans compared to
$60,000 of interest income earned on the two loans during the same 2009 period.
Net interest expense declined during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the
same 2009 period primarily resulting from lower average interest rates during the 2010 period
partially offset by higher debenture average balances. Average interest rates on junior
subordinated debentures declined from 5.36% during the 2009 period to 4.73% during the 2010 period
while average debenture balances increased from $298.2 million
105
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
during the 2009 period to $312.3 million during the 2010 period. Also included in net
interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $172,000 of interest income on
two performing loans compared to $285,000 of interest income earned on the two loans during the
same 2009 period.
Non-interest income during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010 reflects
$292,000 and $826,000, respectively, of fees for executive services provided to BankAtlantic and
the remaining non-interest income for the periods was equity earnings from BankAtlantic Bancorp
Parent Companys investment in statutory business trusts that issue trust preferred securities.
Non-interest income during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was primarily
the result of securities activities, fees for executive services provided to BankAtlantic and
equity earnings from BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys statutory business trusts. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company recognized a $1.4 million
other than temporary decline in value of an investment in an unrelated financial institution and
recognized a $120,000 gain from the sale of 250,233 shares of Stifel common stock received in
connection with the contingent earn-out payment from the sale of Ryan Beck. BankAtlantic Bancorp
Parent Company during the three and nine months ended, recognized $0.1 million and $0.3 million of
equity earnings from statutory business trusts, respectively, as well as $0.3 million and $0.8
million, respectively, of executive service fees.
The increase in non-interest expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010
compared to the same 2009 periods primarily related to higher professional fees associated with
responding to a Securities and Exchange Commission notice of investigation as well as increased
real estate owned losses and write-downs.
In March 2008, BankAtlantic transferred non-performing loans to a work-out subsidiary of
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company. The composition of these loans as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 was as follows (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Nonaccrual loans: |
||||||||
Commercial residential real estate: |
||||||||
Builder land bank loans |
$ | 3,857 | 14,060 | |||||
Land acquisition and development |
4,635 | 10,376 | ||||||
Land acquisition, development and
construction |
5,901 | 14,903 | ||||||
Total commercial residential real estate |
14,393 | 39,339 | ||||||
Commercial non-residential real estate |
5,523 | 5,558 | ||||||
Total non-accrual loans |
19,916 | 44,897 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses specific
reserves |
(4,187 | ) | (13,630 | ) | ||||
Non-accrual loans, net |
15,729 | 31,267 | ||||||
Performing commercial non-residential
loans |
2,877 | 3,116 | ||||||
Loans receivable, net |
$ | 18,606 | 34,383 | |||||
Real estate owned |
$ | 9,766 | 10,532 | |||||
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company
foreclosed on a $5.2 million land acquisition, development and construction loan, and a $7.9
million builder land bank loan. The properties obtained from the two foreclosures were sold for
cash proceeds of $9.8 million. The work-out subsidiary also received $0.3 million of loan
principal repayments during the nine month period and recognized $14.5 million of charge-offs.
106
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys non-accrual loans include large loan balance lending
relationships. Three relationships account for 54.7% of its $19.9 million of non-accrual loans held
by BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company at September 30, 2010. The following table outlines general
information about these relationships as of September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
Unpaid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | Outstanding | Specific | Date loan | Date Placed | Default | Collateral | Date of Last | |||||||||||||||||||
Relationships | Balance | Balance (5) | Reserves | Originated | on Nonaccrual | Date (3) | Type (4) | Full Appraisal | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Business |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 1 |
$ | 5,523 | 5,523 | 360 | Q4-2005 | Q4-2007 | Q4-2007 | Commercial Land | Q4-2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Residential Land Developers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 2 (1) |
19,881 | 3,857 | | Q1-2005 | Q4-2007 | Q1-2008 | Builder Land | Q3-2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 3 (2) |
7,796 | 1,520 | 295 | Q4-2003 | Q4-2007 | Q3-2007 | Land AD&C | Q3-2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Residential
Land Developers |
$ | 27,677 | 5,377 | 295 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 33,200 | 10,900 | 655 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | During 2008, 2009 and 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp recognized partial charge-offs on relationship No. 2 aggregating $16.0 million. | |
(2) | During 2008 and 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp recognized partial charge-offs on relationship No. 3 aggregating $6.3 million. | |
(3) | The default date is defined as the date of the initial missed payment prior to default. | |
(4) | Acquisition and development (A&D). | |
(5) | Outstanding balance is the Unpaid Principal Balance less charge-offs. |
The loans that comprise the above relationships are all collateral dependent. As such,
we established specific reserves or recognized partial charge-offs on these loans based on the fair
value of the underlying collateral less costs to sell. The fair value of the collateral was
determined using third party appraisals for all relationships. Management performs quarterly
impairment analyses on these credit relationships subsequent to the date of the appraisal and may
reduce appraised values if market conditions significantly deteriorate subsequent to the appraisal
date. However, our policy is to obtain a full appraisal within one year from the date of the prior
appraisal, unless the loan is in the process of foreclosure. A full appraisal is generally
obtained at the date of foreclosure.
The activity in BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys allowance for loan losses was as follows
(in thousands):
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of
period |
$ | 7,227 | 15,399 | 13,630 | 11,685 | |||||||||||
Net (charge-offs) |
(4,438 | ) | (8,051 | ) | (14,481 | ) | (12,633 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
1,398 | 11,340 | 5,038 | 19,636 | ||||||||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 4,187 | 18,688 | 4,187 | 18,688 | |||||||||||
The
$4.4 million of charge-offs during the three months ended
September 30, 2010 included a $2.1
million charge-off of a builder land bank loan and remaining charge-offs were related to
acquisition, development and construction loans. Specific valuation allowances of $2.7 million
were established on these loans during prior periods. The remaining charge-offs during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 primarily related to three loans. One loan was charged-off $2.7
million upon the foreclosure and sale of the collateral. One loan was charged-off by $5.7 million
and the other loans entire balance of $1.2 million was charged-off upon the sale of the remaining
collateral. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company had established specific valuation allowances of
$8.6 million on these three loans in prior periods.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys
work-out subsidiary foreclosed on one loan charging the loan down
$1.6 million to the estimated fair value of the loans
collateral less cost to sell. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company foreclosed on three loans charging the loans down $5.1 million.
Additionally, during the three and nine months ended September
107
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
30, 2009 BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys work-out subsidiary specific valuation
allowance was increased $3.3 million and $7.0 million, respectively, associated with a decline in
collateral values on non-performing loans.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. Liquidity and Capital Resources
Currently, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys principal source of liquidity is its cash and
funds obtained from its wholly-owned work-out subsidiary. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company also
may obtain funds through dividends, and issuance of equity and debt securities, although no
dividends from BankAtlantic are anticipated or contemplated for the foreseeable future.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company has historically used its funds to contribute capital to its
subsidiaries, pay debt service and shareholder dividends, repay borrowings, invest in equity
securities and other investments, and fund operations, including funding servicing costs and real
estate owned operating expenses of its wholly-owned work-out subsidiary. At September 30, 2010,
BankAtlantic Bancorp had approximately $318.8 million of junior subordinated debentures outstanding
with maturities ranging from 2032 through 2037. The aggregate annual interest obligations on this
indebtedness totaled approximately $14.7 million based on interest rates at September 30, 2010
which are generally indexed to three-month LIBOR. In order to preserve liquidity in the current
economic environment, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company elected in February 2009 to commence
deferring interest payments on all of its outstanding junior subordinated debentures and to cease
paying cash dividends on its common stock. The terms of the junior subordinated debentures and the
trust documents allow BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company to defer payments of interest for up to
20 consecutive quarterly periods without default or penalty. During the deferral period, the
respective trusts have suspended the declaration and payment of dividends on the trust preferred
securities. The deferral election began as of March 2009, and regularly scheduled quarterly
interest payments aggregating $24.6 million that would otherwise have been paid during the 21
months ended September 30, 2010 were deferred. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company has the
ability under the junior subordinated debentures to continue to defer interest payments through
ongoing appropriate notices to each of the trustees, and will make a decision each quarter as to
whether to continue the deferral of interest. During the deferral period, interest will continue
to accrue on the junior subordinated debentures at the stated coupon rate, including on the
deferred interest, and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company will continue to record the interest
expense associated with the junior subordinated debentures. During the deferral period,
BankAtlantic Bancorp may not, among other things and with limited exceptions, pay cash dividends on
or repurchase its common stock nor make any payment on outstanding debt obligations that rank
equally with or junior to the junior subordinated debentures. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company
may end the deferral by paying all accrued and unpaid interest. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent
Company anticipates that it will continue to defer interest on its junior subordinated debentures
and will not pay dividends on its common stock for the foreseeable future. If BankAtlantic Bancorp
Parent Company continues to defer interest on its junior subordinated debentures through the year
ended December 31, 2013, it will owe an aggregate of approximately $73.9 million of unpaid interest
based on average interest rates as of September 30, 2010. BankAtlantic Bancorps financial
condition and liquidity could be adversely affected if interest payments were deferred for a
prolonged time period.
During the year ended December 31, 2009 and during the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company did not receive dividends from BankAtlantic. The ability of
BankAtlantic to pay dividends or make other distributions to BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company in
subsequent periods is subject to regulations and Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) approval and
is based upon BankAtlantics regulatory capital levels and net income. Because BankAtlantic has an
accumulated deficit during the prior two years, BankAtlantic is required to file an application to
receive approval of the OTS in order to pay dividends to BankAtlantic Bancorp. The OTS would not
approve any distribution that would cause BankAtlantic to fail to meet its capital requirements or
if the OTS believes that a capital distribution by BankAtlantic constitutes an unsafe or unsound
action or practice, and there is no assurance that the OTS will approve future capital
distributions from BankAtlantic. BankAtlantic has not filed an application with the OTS for
approval to pay a dividend since September 2008 and BankAtlantic Bancorp does not expect to receive
cash dividends from BankAtlantic during 2010 or for the forseeable future. However, BankAtlantic Bancorp
may receive dividends from its asset work-out subsidiary upon the monetizing of the subsidiaries
non-performing loans. There is no assurance that BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company will be able
to monetize the loans on acceptable terms, if at all.
BankAtlantic on a
parent basis has committed not to incur, issue, renew or rollover any
current line of credit, guarantee the debt of
any entity or otherwise incur any additional debt without receiving the prior written non-objection of the OTS.
In February 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp filed a registration statement with the Securities and
Exchange Commission registering to offer, from time to time, up to $75 million of Class A common
stock, preferred stock, subscription rights, warrants or debt securities. A description of the
securities offered and the expected use of the net
108
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
proceeds from any sales will be outlined in a prospectus supplement if and when offered. As a
result of the completion of the rights offering discussed below, $55 million of securities remain
available for future issuance under this registration statement.
On June 18, 2010 a prospectus supplement was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to a $25 million rights offering to BankAtlantic Bancorps shareholders. BankAtlantic
Bancorp distributed to each holder of record who owned shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A
common stock and Class B common stock on June 14, 2010 non-transferable subscription rights to
purchase 0.327 shares of Class A common stock for each share of Class A and Class B common stock
owned on that date. The rights offering was for an aggregate amount of $25 million with a
subscription price of $1.50 per share. Shareholders who exercised their basic subscription rights
in full were given the opportunity to request to purchase additional shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A common stock that were not subscribed for in the rights offering.
During June 2010, BFC exercised its basic subscription rights, in full, amounting to 5,986,865
shares, and requested to purchase an additional 4,013,135 shares of Class A common stock to the
extent available. In connection with the exercise of its subscription rights, BFC delivered to
BankAtlantic Bancorp $15.0 million in cash, which represented the full purchase price for all of
the shares subscribed for by BFC. In exchange, BankAtlantic Bancorp issued to BFC 4,697,184 shares
of Class A common stock, which represented substantially all of its basic subscription rights
exercise (less only rights relating to shares held in street name), and delivered to BFC a $8.0
million promissory note for the balance of the funds received. The promissory note had a scheduled
maturity of July 30, 2010 and was payable in cash or shares of Class A common stock issuable to BFC
in connection with its exercise of subscription rights in the rights offering. The delivery of
funds by BFC directly to BankAtlantic Bancorp in connection with the exercise of its subscription
rights enabled BankAtlantic Bancorp to contribute the $15.0 million of proceeds from the promissory
note and the issuance of Class A common stock to BankAtlantic as a capital contribution prior to
the end of the 2010 second quarter.
In July 2010 in connection with the completion of the rights offering, BankAtlantic Bancorp
satisfied the promissory note due to BFC in accordance with its terms by issuing to BFC the
additional 5,302,816 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A common stock subscribed for by BFC in
the rights offering.
The rights offering was completed on July 20, 2010 with BankAtlantic Bancorp issuing an
aggregate of 13,340,379 shares of Class A common stock for net proceeds of approximately $20
million, including 10,000,000 shares issued to BFC.
In October 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp filed a registration statement with the Securities and
Exchange Commission registering the offer and sale of up to $125 million of its Class A common
stock in an underwritten public offering. This registration statement has not yet been declared
effective and it is uncertain whether BankAtlantic Bancorp will pursue the sale of any of the shares of Class A common
stock under this registration statement.
During January 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp commenced cash offers to purchase all outstanding
trust preferred securities having an aggregate principal amount of approximately $285 million at a
purchase price of $200 per $1,000 liquidation amount, or an aggregate of $57 million. During
February 2010, the offer to purchase with respect to the approximate $55 million of publicly traded
trust preferred securities issued by BBC Capital Trust II expired without any such trust preferred
securities being repurchased, while the expiration date for the offers to purchase relating to the
remaining $230 million of trust preferred securities was extended. On May 21, 2010, BankAtlantic
Bancorp increased the purchase price for each Offer to $600 cash per $1,000 in principal amount of
each series of the TruPS, which would have been an aggregate amount of $138 million if all the
TruPS were purchased. BankAtlantic Bancorp had been advised that consents were received from the
holders of in excess of 66 2/3% of the most-senior classes of notes issued by Preferred Term
Securities IX, Inc. (PreTSL IX). The consents directed the trustee of PreTSL IX, The Bank of New
York Mellon, to accept the offer for $25.2 million aggregate principal amount of the Fixed/Floating
Rate Capital Securities of BBC Capital Statutory Trust X (the BBC X TruPS) held by PreTSL IX (the
offer). The Bank of New York Mellon advised BankAtlantic Bancorp that it would not accept the
offer made to PreTSL IX without receiving a greater percentage of consents. We disagreed with The
Bank of New York Mellons interpretation and believed that the consents received exceeded the
threshold required by the indenture of PreTSL IX to authorize the trustee to accept the offer made
to PreTSL IX. We filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court in Broward County, Florida seeking a
declaratory judgment and order from the Court directing The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee,
and without any liability to the holders of any class of notes issued by PreTSL IX, to act on the
direction received. In August 2010, we terminated the offers with respect to the
109
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
$230 million of TruPS and dismissed the lawsuit filed against The Bank of New York Mellon.
Upon the termination of the offers, BankAtlantic Bancorp recognized $0.8 million of tender
transaction costs included in other expenses in the Companys statement of operations during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company
contributed $28 million of capital to BankAtlantic and during the year ended December 31, 2009,
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company contributed $105 million of capital to BankAtlantic.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company did not contribute any capital to BankAtlantic during the
quarter ended September 30, 2010.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company is generally required to provide BankAtlantic with managerial
assistance and capital as the OTS may determine necessary under applicable regulations and
supervisory standards. Any such financing would be sought through public or private offerings, in
privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Additionally, we could pursue financings at
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company level or directly at BankAtlantic or both. Any financing
involving the issuance of our Class A common stock or securities convertible or exercisable for our
Class A common stock could be highly dilutive for our existing shareholders. There is no assurance
that any such financing will be available to us on favorable terms or at all.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company has the following cash and investments that it believes
provide a source for potential liquidity based on values at September 30, 2010 (in thousands).
As of September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Value | Appreciation | Depreciation | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 12,240 | | | 12,240 | |||||||||||
Securities available for sale |
10 | | 2 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Private investment securities |
1,500 | | | 1,500 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 13,750 | | 2 | 13,748 | |||||||||||
The non-performing loans transferred to the wholly-owned subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp
may also provide a potential source of liquidity through workouts, repayments of the loans or
sales of interests in the subsidiary. The balance of these loans and real estate owned at
September 30, 2010 was $32.6 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company received net cash flows of $9.3 million from its work-out
subsidiary.
BankAtlantic Liquidity and Capital Resources
BankAtlantics primary sources of funds are deposits; principal repayments of loans, tax
certificates and securities available for sale; proceeds from the sale of loans and securities
available for sale; proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase; advances from
FHLB; Treasury and Federal Reserve lending programs; interest payments on loans and securities;
capital contributions from BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and other funds generated by
operations. These funds are primarily utilized to fund loan disbursements and purchases, deposit
outflows, repayments of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, repayments of advances
from FHLB and other borrowings, purchases of tax certificates and securities available for sale,
acquisitions of properties and equipment, and operating expenses. BankAtlantics liquidity will
depend on its ability to generate sufficient cash to support loan demand, to meet deposit
withdrawals, and to pay operating expenses. BankAtlantics securities portfolio provides an
internal source of liquidity through its short-term investments as well as scheduled maturities
and interest payments. Loan repayments and loan sales also provide an internal source of
liquidity. BankAtlantics liquidity is also dependent, in part, on its ability to maintain or
increase deposit levels and availability under lines of credit and Treasury and Federal Reserve
lending programs. BankAtlantics ability to increase or maintain deposits is impacted by
competition from other financial institutions and alternative investments as well as the current
low interest rate environment. Such competition, an increase in interest rates or an increase in liquidity needs may require
BankAtlantic to offer higher interest rates to maintain or grow deposits, which may not be
successful in generating deposits, and which would increase its cost of funds or reduce its net
interest income. BankAtlantic has committed not to offer interest rates on its deposits which are significantly higher than market area rates. Additionally, BankAtlantics current lines of credit may not be available when
needed as these lines of credit are subject to periodic review and may be terminated or reduced at
the discretion of the issuing institutions or reduced based on availability of qualifying
collateral. BankAtlantics unused lines of credit increased from $760 million as
110
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
of December 31, 2009 to $915 million as of September 30, 2010 due to increases in available
collateral resulting from the purchase of agency and municipal securities partially offset by
lower loan balances. Additionally, interest rate changes, additional collateral requirements,
disruptions in the capital markets, deterioration in BankAtlantics financial condition,
litigation or regulatory action may make borrowings unavailable or make terms of the borrowings
and deposits less favorable. There is a risk that our cost of funds will increase and that the
borrowing capacity from funding sources may decrease.
In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was signed into
law permanently raising the maximum standard deposit insurance to $250,000 per depositor, for each
ownership category as defined by the FDIC. In addition to this standard insurance coverage, the
FDIC has announced that participating depository institutions may provide full deposit insurance
coverage for non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts with rates at or below fifty basis
points, regardless of dollar amount. This new, temporary guarantee was scheduled to expire at
December 31, 2010; however, the act extended the program until December 31, 2012. BankAtlantic
opted-in to the additional coverage on the subject deposits. As a result, BankAtlantic is
assessed a 15-basis point surcharge for non-interest bearing deposit transaction account balances
exceeding the insured amount.
The FHLB has granted BankAtlantic a line of credit capped at 30% of assets subject to
available collateral, with a maximum term of ten years. BankAtlantic utilized its FHLB line of
credit to borrow $180 million and to obtain a $252 million letter of credit primarily securing
public deposits as of September 30, 2010. The line of credit is secured by a blanket lien on
BankAtlantics residential mortgage loans and certain commercial real estate and consumer home
equity loans. BankAtlantics unused available borrowings under this line of credit were
approximately $516 million at September 30, 2010. An additional source of liquidity for
BankAtlantic is its securities portfolio. As of September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic had $391 million
of unpledged securities that could be sold or pledged for additional borrowings with the FHLB, the
Federal Reserve or other financial institutions. BankAtlantic is a participating institution in
the Federal Reserve Treasury Investment Program for up to $2.7 million in funding and at September
30, 2010, BankAtlantic had $1.8 million of short-term borrowings outstanding under this program.
BankAtlantic is also eligible to participate in the Federal Reserves discount window program under its secondary credit program. The
amount that can be borrowed under this program is dependent on the delivery of collateral to the Federal Reserve and
BankAtlantic had unused available borrowings of approximately $8 million as of September 30, 2010,
with no amounts outstanding under this program at September 30, 2010.
We are not permitted to incur day-light overdrafts in our Federal Reserve bank account and accordingly our intent is to
continue to maintain sufficient funds at the Federal Reserve to supply intraday activity.
The above lines of credit are subject to periodic review and any of the above borrowings may be limited, or may not be
available to us at all or additional collateral could be required, in which case BankAtlantics
liquidity would be materially adversely affected.
BankAtlantic also has various relationships to execute repurchase agreements, which may to a
limited extent be utilized as an alternative source of liquidity.
At September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic had $19.1 million of
securities sold under agreements to repurchase outstanding, representing 0.4% of total assets.
Additional repurchase agreement borrowings are subject to available collateral. Additionally,
BankAtlantic had total cash on hand or with other financial institutions of $337.6 million as of
September 30, 2010.
Historically, brokered deposits previously served as an additional source of liquidity. Included in deposits at September 30, 2010
was $26.7 million in brokered deposits. BankAtlantic has committed not to acquire or renew its brokered deposit balances and expects
the balance of its brokered deposits to decline for the foreseeable future.
BankAtlantics liquidity may be affected by unforeseen demands on cash. Our objective in
managing liquidity is to maintain sufficient resources of available liquid assets to address our
funding needs. Multiple market disruptions have made it more difficult for us and for financial institutions generally
to borrow money. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty how long these adverse market
conditions may continue, nor can we anticipate the degree that such market conditions may impact
our operations. Deterioration in the performance of other financial institutions may adversely
impact the ability of all financial institutions to access liquidity. There is no assurance that
further deterioration in the financial markets will not further impact us or result in additional market-wide liquidity
problems, and affect our liquidity position. We believe BankAtlantic has improved its liquidity
position during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 by reducing assets, increasing agency
guaranteed securities and paying down borrowings.
BankAtlantics commitment to originate and purchase loans was $49.3 million at September 30,
2010 compared to $61.1 million at September 30, 2009. At September 30, 2010, total loan
commitments represented approximately 1.52% of net loans receivable.
At September 30, 2010, BankAtlantic had mortgage-backed securities of approximately $19.4
million pledged to secure securities sold under agreements to repurchase, $4.6 million pledged to
secure public deposits,
and $2.7 million pledged to secure treasury tax and loan accounts and potential borrowings at
the Federal Reserve discount window.
111
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
At the indicated dates, BankAtlantics capital amounts and ratios were (dollars in
thousands):
Minimum Ratios | ||||||||||||||||
Adequately | Well | |||||||||||||||
Actual | Capitalized | Capitalized | ||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | |||||||||||||
At September 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital |
$ | 380,342 | 12.59 | % | 8.00 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
319,945 | 10.59 | 4.00 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||
Tangible capital |
319,945 | 7.17 | 1.50 | 1.50 | ||||||||||||
Core capital |
319,945 | 7.17 | 4.00 | 5.00 | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital |
$ | 422,724 | 12.56 | % | 8.00 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
357,660 | 10.63 | 4.00 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||
Tangible capital |
357,660 | 7.58 | 1.50 | 1.50 | ||||||||||||
Core capital |
357,660 | 7.58 | 4.00 | 5.00 |
Savings institutions are also subject to the provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA). Regulations implementing the prompt corrective
action provisions of FDICIA define specific capital categories based on FDICIAs defined capital
ratios, as discussed more fully in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.
The OTS at its discretion can require an institution to maintain capital amounts and ratios
significantly above the well capitalized requirements based on the risk profile of the specific
institution. BankAtlantic currently expects to receive formal communication from the OTS that we
anticipate will require BankAtlantic to maintain regulatory capital ratios at levels above the
minimum amounts required for well capitalized institutions. Higher capital requirements could
require BankAtlantic to raise additional capital or to reduce its asset size further, making it
more difficult to achieve profitability. There is no assurance that BankAtlantic or the Company
would be successful in raising additional capital in subsequent periods and the inability to raise
capital or otherwise meet regulatory requirements would have a material adverse impact on the
Companys business, results of operations and financial condition.
BankAtlantic works closely with its regulators during the course of its exams and on an
ongoing basis. Communications with our regulators include providing information on an ad-hoc,
one-time or regular basis related to areas of regulatory oversight and bank operations. As part of
such communications, BankAtlantic has provided to its regulators forecasts, strategic business
plans and other information relating to anticipated asset balances, asset quality, capital levels,
expenses, anticipated earnings, levels of brokered deposits and liquidity. Additionally,
BankAtlantic is subject to various restrictions, which among other things include that
BankAtlantic will not, unless pursuant to an approved business plan or permitted by the OTS,
increase its assets, originate or purchase new commercial real estate loans, acquire or renew
brokered deposits or pay dividends to its Parent Company. Further, it will not solicit deposits
by offering interest rates significantly higher than market area rates.
112
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
Contractual Obligations and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements as of September 30, 2010 were (in
thousands):
Payments Due by Period (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | After 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | 1 year | 1-3 years | 4-5 years | years | |||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
$ | 648,751 | 482,816 | 142,486 | 20,974 | 2,475 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
340,802 | | 22,000 | 24,607 | 294,195 | |||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB (1) |
180,000 | 180,000 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations held for
sublease |
31,451 | 1,306 | 3,982 | 2,749 | 23,414 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations held for use |
38,603 | 5,590 | 12,913 | 4,495 | 15,605 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease held for sale |
27,769 | 1,671 | 4,759 | 2,896 | 18,443 | |||||||||||||||
Pension obligation |
17,884 | 1,473 | 3,040 | 3,342 | 10,029 | |||||||||||||||
Other obligations |
12,800 | 1,600 | 6,400 | 4,800 | | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
$ | 1,298,060 | 674,456 | 195,580 | 63,863 | 364,161 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Payments due by period are based on contractual maturities | |
(2) | The above table excludes interest payments on interest bearing liabilities |
113
Table of Contents
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management evaluated, with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer,
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2010 to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to
allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
114
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in our legal proceedings from those
disclosed in the Legal Proceedings section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and
June 30, 2010.
In re BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 0:07-cv-61542-UU, United States
District Court, Southern District of Florida
On October 29, 2007, Joseph C. Hubbard filed a purported class action in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Florida against BankAtlantic Bancorp and four of its
current or former officers. The Defendants in this action are BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., James A.
White, Valerie C. Toalson, Jarett S. Levan, and Alan B. Levan. The Complaint, which was later
amended, alleges that during the purported class period of November 9, 2005 through October 25,
2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp and the named officers knowingly and/or recklessly made
misrepresentations of material fact regarding BankAtlantic and specifically BankAtlantics loan
portfolio and allowance for loan losses. The Complaint seeks to assert claims for violations of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and seeks unspecified
damages. On December 12, 2007, the Court consolidated into Hubbard a separately filed action
captioned Alarm Specialties, Inc. v. BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., No. 0:07cv-61623-WPD. On
February 5, 2008, the Court appointed State-Boston Retirement System lead plaintiff and Lubaton
Sucharow LLP to serve as lead counsel pursuant to the provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act. BankAtlantic Bancorp believes the claims to be without merit and intends to
vigorously defend the actions. A jury trial on these claims commenced on October 12, 2010 and the
jury is currently in deliberations. Plaintiffs are seeking damages with respect to shares that
were purchased during and held throughout the class period of $0.37 per share for a portion of the
class period and $2.93 per share for another portion of the class period. As the number of shares
for which any damage claim could be asserted is not determinable at this time, the amount of any
loss that might be incurred by BankAtlantic Bancorp if the claims are decided against BankAtlantic
Bancorp cannot be reasonably estimated.
Surety Bond Claim (Westchester Fire Insurance Company v. City of Brooksville
This litigation arose from a dispute regarding liability under two performance bonds for
infrastructure issued in connection with a plat issued by the City of Brooksville for a single
family housing project that was not commenced. The project had been abandoned by Levitt and Sons
prior to its bankruptcy filing as non-viable as a consequence of the economic downturn and, in
connection with the Levitt and Sons bankruptcy, the mortgagee, Key Bank, was permitted by agreement
to initiate and conclude a foreclosure leading to the acquisition of the property by Key Banks
subsidiary. The City of Brooksville contended that, notwithstanding that the development had not
proceeded and was not likely to proceed at any known time in the future, it was entitled to recover
the face of the amount of the bonds in the approximate amount of $5.4 million. The company filed a
suit for declaratory judgment (in the name of its surety, Westchester) against the City of
Brooksville contending that the obligation under the bonds had terminated. In August 2010,
Woodbridge was granted a motion for summary judgment terminating any obligations under the bonds.
Subsequent to the motion being granted, the municipality appealed the decision.
National Bank of South Carolina v. Core Communities of South Carolina, LLC, et al., South Carolina
Court of Common Pleas, Fourteenth Judicial Circuit
On January 13, 2010, National Bank of South Carolina filed a complaint in the South Carolina
Court of Common Pleas, Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, to commence foreclosure proceedings related to
property at Tradition Hilton Head which served as collateral under a note and mortgage executed and
delivered by Core South Carolina, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Core, in favor of the lender. With Cores concurrence,
the property was subsequently placed under the control of a receiver appointed by the court. Core
is secondarily liable to the lender as a guarantor but was not a party to the action.
On September 1, 2010, Synovus Bank (successor by merger to National Bank of South Carolina)
commenced an action to enforce the guarantee executed by Core in connection with the loan
transactions between Core South Carolina, LLC and National
Bank of South Carolina. Through this action,
115
Table of Contents
Synovus Bank seeks to collect on approximately $25 million of indebtedness guaranteed by
Core. On October 25, 2010, Core filed an answer and affirmative defenses asserting, among other
things, that the claim on the guarantee is not ripe given the banks election to first foreclose
against the underlying collateral. In addition, Core has raised additional equitable defenses to
the claim on the guarantee. Discovery in the case has not yet commenced, and the trial date has
been set. The amount of Cores liability, if any, in this litigation has not been established.
Investors Warranty of America, Inc. v. Core Communities of South Carolina, LLC and Core Communities, LLC, et. al., Circuit Court, Jasper County, South Carolina, and
Investors Warranty of America, Inc. v. Core Communities, LLC and Horizons Acquisition 5, LLC, Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for St. Lucie County, Florida
Investors Warranty of America, Inc. v. Core Communities, LLC and Horizons Acquisition 5, LLC, Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for St. Lucie County, Florida
On September 8, 2010, Core and the other defendants entered into an agreement with the Investors Warranty of America, among other parties, relating to foreclosure proceedings. Investors Warranty of America previously commenced foreclosure proceedings on property located in Florida and South Carolina which serves as collateral under loans which Core has defaulted on.
Subsequently, Investors Warranty of America assigned and conveyed its interests in both the Florida and South Carolina loan facilities to PSL Acquisitions, LLC (PSLA). On November 8, 2010, Core and its applicable subsidiaries, on the one hand, and PSLA, on the other hand, executed an agreement which, upon the occurrence of certain events and subject to certain exceptions, provides for the resolution of the disputes between them. Pursuant to the agreement, Core and its subsidiaries
agreed to, among other things, (i) pledge additional collateral to PSLA consisting of membership interests in certain subsidiaries of Core, (ii) grant security interests in the acreage owned by the subsidiaries in Port St. Lucie, Florida, substantially all of which is undeveloped raw land, (iii) the amendment of the complaint related to the Florida foreclosure action to include this additional collateral and (iv) the entry into consensual judgments of foreclosure in both foreclosure actions.
Core also agreed to cooperate with PSLA in connection with the enforcement of its remedies against the collateral. PSLA has agreed, upon the occurrence of certain events and subject to certain exceptions, not to enforce a deficiency judgment against Core and has released Core from any other claims arising from or relating to the loans.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risks and uncertainties that we face from those
disclosed in the Risk Factors section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
116
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit 31.1 *
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 31.2 *
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 31.3 *
|
Chief Accounting Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 32.1 **
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 32.2 **
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 32.3 **
|
Chief Accounting Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* | Exhibits filed with this Form 10-Q | |
** | Exhibits furnished with this Form 10-Q |
117
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BFC FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
||||
Date: November 17, 2010 | By: | /s/ Alan B. Levan | ||
Alan B. Levan, Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: November 17, 2010 | By: | /s/ John K. Grelle | ||
John K. Grelle, Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Date: November 17, 2010 | By: | /s/ Maria R. Scheker | ||
Maria R. Scheker, Chief Accounting Officer | ||||