Bluegreen Vacations Holding Corp - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010
OR
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File Number
001-09071
001-09071
BFC Financial Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Florida | 59-2022148 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
2100 West Cypress Creek Road Fort Lauderdale, Florida |
33309 | |
(Address of Principal executive office) | (Zip Code) |
(954) 940-4900
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
YES o NO x
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock as of May 17,
2010 is as follows:
Class A Common Stock of $.01 par value, 68,521,497 shares outstanding as of May 17, 2010.
Class B Common Stock of $.01 par value, 6,859,251 shares outstanding as of May 17, 2010.
Class B Common Stock of $.01 par value, 6,859,251 shares outstanding as of May 17, 2010.
BFC Financial Corporation
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition Unaudited
(In thousands, except share data)
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition Unaudited
(In thousands, except share data)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and due from depository institutions |
$ | 516,860 | 315,580 | |||||
Short-term investments |
500 | 500 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
53,178 | 24,020 | ||||||
Securities available for sale, at fair value |
278,476 | 346,375 | ||||||
Investment securities at cost or amortized cost (fair value: $1,981 in 2010 and $9,654 in 2009) |
1,981 | 9,654 | ||||||
Current income tax receivable |
64,006 | 64,006 | ||||||
Tax certificates, net of allowance of $7,341 in 2010 and $6,781 in 2009 |
88,438 | 110,991 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost which approximates fair
value |
48,751 | 48,751 | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
5,030 | 4,547 | ||||||
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of
$177,597 in 2010 and $187,218 in 2009 |
3,499,925 | 3,678,894 | ||||||
Notes receivable including gross securitized notes,
net of allowance of $81,116 in 2010 and $3,986 in 2009 |
626,131 | 277,274 | ||||||
Retained interest in notes receivable sold |
| 26,340 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
29,756 | 32,279 | ||||||
Real estate inventory |
505,066 | 494,291 | ||||||
Real estate owned and other repossessed assets |
51,365 | 46,477 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
12,225 | 15,272 | ||||||
Properties and equipment, net |
283,593 | 289,209 | ||||||
Goodwill |
12,241 | 12,241 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
80,182 | 81,686 | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
71,293 | 71,900 | ||||||
Other assets |
121,743 | 96,750 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,350,740 | 6,047,037 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Interest bearing deposits |
$ | 3,146,223 | 3,133,360 | |||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
896,466 | 815,458 | ||||||
Total deposits |
4,042,689 | 3,948,818 | ||||||
Advances from FHLB |
152,008 | 282,012 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
24,674 | 24,468 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and other short term borrowings |
2,628 | 2,803 | ||||||
Receivable-backed notes payable |
619,563 | 237,416 | ||||||
Notes and mortgage notes payable and other borrowings |
381,260 | 395,361 | ||||||
Junior subordinated debentures |
450,374 | 447,211 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
27,756 | 31,204 | ||||||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
76,297 | 76,351 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
194,023 | 186,453 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
5,971,272 | 5,632,097 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Preferred stock of $.01 par value; authorized - 10,000,000 shares: |
||||||||
Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock $.01 par value;
authorized 15,000 shares; issued and outstanding 15,000 shares
with a redemption value of $1,000 per share |
11,029 | 11,029 | ||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Class A common stock of $.01 par value, authorized 150,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 68,521,497 in 2010 and 2009 |
685 | 685 | ||||||
Class B common stock of $.01 par value, authorized 20,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 6,854,251 in 2010 and 2009 |
69 | 69 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
229,083 | 227,934 | ||||||
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings |
(6,552 | ) | 16,608 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
2,380 | (237 | ) | |||||
Total BFC Financial Corporation (BFC) shareholders equity |
225,665 | 245,059 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
142,774 | 158,852 | ||||||
Total equity |
368,439 | 403,911 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 6,350,740 | 6,047,037 | |||||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenues |
||||||||
Real Estate and Other: |
||||||||
Sales of real estate |
$ | 18,595 | 1,427 | |||||
Other resorts and communities operations revenue |
16,021 | | ||||||
Other revenues |
11,187 | 892 | ||||||
Interest income |
30,011 | | ||||||
75,814 | 2,319 | |||||||
Financial Services: |
||||||||
Interest income |
47,603 | 62,908 | ||||||
Service charges on deposits |
15,048 | 18,685 | ||||||
Other service charges and fees |
7,378 | 7,025 | ||||||
Securities activities, net |
3,138 | 4,440 | ||||||
Other non-interest income |
3,199 | 2,650 | ||||||
76,366 | 95,708 | |||||||
Total revenues |
152,180 | 98,027 | ||||||
Costs and Expenses |
||||||||
Real Estate and Other: |
||||||||
Cost of sales of real estate |
8,896 | 693 | ||||||
Cost of sales of other resorts and communities
operations |
12,690 | | ||||||
Interest expense |
19,931 | 2,248 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
54,654 | 10,955 | ||||||
96,171 | 13,896 | |||||||
Financial Services: |
||||||||
Interest expense |
11,844 | 24,775 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
30,755 | 44,277 | ||||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
25,378 | 28,806 | ||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
13,582 | 14,911 | ||||||
Advertising and promotion |
1,944 | 2,832 | ||||||
Check losses |
432 | 844 | ||||||
Professional fees |
2,887 | 3,326 | ||||||
Supplies and postage |
998 | 1,004 | ||||||
Telecommunication |
534 | 698 | ||||||
Cost associated with debt redemption |
7 | 591 | ||||||
Provision for tax certificates |
733 | 1,486 | ||||||
Restructuring charges and exit activities |
143 | 1,875 | ||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
| 8,541 | ||||||
Other expenses |
7,372 | 7,642 | ||||||
96,609 | 141,608 | |||||||
Total costs and expenses |
192,780 | 155,504 | ||||||
Gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridges
subsidiary |
| 40,369 | ||||||
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates |
4 | 6,495 | ||||||
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates |
| (20,401 | ) | |||||
Impairment of investments |
| (2,396 | ) | |||||
Other income |
754 | 981 | ||||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
(39,842 | ) | (32,429 | ) | ||||
Less: Benefit for income taxes |
(4,591 | ) | | |||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(35,251 | ) | (32,429 | ) | ||||
(Loss) income from
discontinued operations |
(249 | ) | 3,397 | |||||
Net loss |
(35,500 | ) | (29,032 | ) | ||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(14,665 | ) | (18,629 | ) | ||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
(20,835 | ) | (10,403 | ) | ||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Net loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (21,023 | ) | (10,591 | ) | |||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Basic and Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Common Share
Attributable to BFC (Note 21): |
||||||||
Basic (Loss) Earnings Per Common Share |
||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.28 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||
Earnings per share from discontinued
operations |
| 0.03 | ||||||
Net loss per common share |
$ | (0.28 | ) | (0.23 | ) | |||
Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Common Share |
||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.28 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||
Earnings per share from discontinued
operations |
| 0.03 | ||||||
Net loss per common share |
$ | (0.28 | ) | (0.23 | ) | |||
Basic weighted average number of
common shares outstanding |
75,376 | 45,114 | ||||||
Diluted weighted average number of common
and common equivalent shares outstanding |
75,376 | 45,114 | ||||||
Amounts attributable to BFC common shareholders: |
||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
$ | (20,774 | ) | (11,659 | ) | |||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
(249 | ) | 1,068 | |||||
Net loss attributable to BFC common
shareholders |
$ | (21,023 | ) | (10,591 | ) | |||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss Unaudited
(In thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss Unaudited
(In thousands)
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net loss |
$ | (35,500 | ) | (29,032 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||
Unrealized gains on securities available for sale |
3,439 | 7,016 | ||||||
Unrealized gains associated with investment in unconsolidated
affiliates |
| 473 | ||||||
Realized gains reclassified into net loss |
(3,139 | ) | (2,044 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income |
300 | 5,445 | ||||||
Comprehensive loss |
(35,200 | ) | (23,587 | ) | ||||
Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(16,057 | ) | (14,740 | ) | ||||
Total comprehensive loss attributable to BFC |
$ | (19,143 | ) | (8,847 | ) | |||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity Unaudited
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
(In thousands)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity Unaudited
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
(In thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Accumulated | Compre- | Total | Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares of Common | Class A | Class B | Additional | Deficit) | hensive | BFC | controlling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Outstanding | Common | Common | Paid-in | Retained | Income | Shareholders | Interest in | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Class B | Stock | Stock | Capital | Earnings | (Loss) | Equity | Subsidiaries | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
68,521 | 6,854 | $ | 685 | $ | 69 | $ | 227,934 | $ | 16,608 | $ | (237 | ) | $ | 245,059 | $ | 158,852 | $ | 403,911 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle (Note 2) |
| | | | | (2,137 | ) | 925 | (1,212 | ) | (811 | ) | (2,023 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance beginning of year, as
adjusted |
$ | 685 | $ | 69 | $ | 227,934 | $ | 14,471 | $ | 688 | $ | 243,847 | $ | 158,041 | $ | 401,888 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (20,835 | ) | (20,835 | ) | (14,665 | ) | (35,500 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
| | | | | | 1,692 | 1,692 | (1,392 | ) | 300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net effect of subsidiaries capital
transactions attributable to BFC |
| | | | 814 | | | 814 | | 814 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest net effect of
subsidiaries capital transactions |
| | | | | | | | 790 | 790 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends on 5% Preferred Stock |
| | | | | (188 | ) | | (188 | ) | | (188 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation
related to stock options |
| | | | 335 | | | 335 | | 335 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
68,521 | 6,854 | $ | 685 | $ | 69 | $ | 229,083 | $ | (6,552 | ) | $ | 2,380 | $ | 225,665 | $ | 142,774 | $ | 368,439 | |||||||||||||||||||||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Unaudited
(In thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Unaudited
(In thousands)
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | 29,102 | (5,013 | ) | ||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from redemption and maturity of investment securities
and tax certificates |
34,866 | 43,528 | ||||||
Purchase of investment securities and tax certificates |
(21,953 | ) | (29,491 | ) | ||||
Purchase of securities available for sale |
(13,351 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
68,963 | 162,170 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale |
32,138 | 37,561 | ||||||
Decrease in restricted cash |
6,707 | 12,713 | ||||||
Cash paid in settlement of Woodbridge subsidiarys bankruptcy |
| (12,430 | ) | |||||
Purchases of FHLB stock |
| (2,295 | ) | |||||
Redemption of FHLB stock |
| 8,151 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
| (461 | ) | |||||
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates |
140 | 224 | ||||||
Net decrease in loans |
118,217 | 69,773 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of loans receivable |
26,421 | | ||||||
Improvements to real estate owned |
(779 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from sales of real estate owned |
3,269 | 602 | ||||||
Purchases of office property and equipment, net |
(2,073 | ) | (973 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of Pizza Fusion |
| 3,000 | ||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
252,565 | 292,072 | ||||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Net increase in deposits |
93,871 | 128,618 | ||||||
Net repayments of FHLB advances |
(130,000 | ) | (150,591 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in short term borrowings |
31 | (188,521 | ) | |||||
Prepayment of notes and bonds payable |
(661 | ) | | |||||
Repayment of notes, mortgage notes and bonds payable |
(51,576 | ) | (583 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from notes, mortgage notes and bonds payable |
8,205 | 132 | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends paid |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Purchase and retirement of Woodbridge common stock |
| (13 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A common stock
to non-BFC shareholders |
65 | | ||||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp common stock dividends paid to non-BFC
shareholders |
| (198 | ) | |||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp non-controlling interest distributions |
(134 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(80,387 | ) | (211,344 | ) | ||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
201,280 | 75,715 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
316,080 | 278,937 | ||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and short term investments at end of period |
$ | 517,360 | 354,652 | |||||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Unaudited
(In thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Unaudited
(In thousands)
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||
Interest paid on borrowings and deposits |
$ | 21,215 | 29,424 | |||||
Income taxes paid |
128 | | ||||||
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Loans and tax certificates transferred to real estate owned |
7,503 | 3,388 | ||||||
Long-lived assets held-for-use transferred to assets held for sale |
1,919 | | ||||||
Long-lived assets held-for-sale transferred to assets held for use |
1,239 | | ||||||
Increase in BFC accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes |
1,692 | 1,556 | ||||||
Net increase in BFC shareholders equity from
the effect of subsidiaries capital transactions, net of taxes |
814 | 391 | ||||||
Net decrease in equity resulting from cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle (See Note 2) |
(2,023 | ) | |
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
9
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. | Presentation of Interim Financial Statements |
BFC Financial Corporation (BFC or, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise
requires, we, us, our or the Company) is a diversified holding company whose principal
holdings include a controlling interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including BankAtlantic
(BankAtlantic Bancorp), a controlling interest in Bluegreen Corporation and its subsidiaries
(Bluegreen), a controlling interest in Core Communities, LLC (Core or Core Communities) and a
non-controlling interest in Benihana, Inc. (Benihana). As a result of its position as the
controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC is a unitary savings bank holding company
regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).
As previously disclosed, on September 21, 2009, BFC consummated its merger with Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation pursuant to which Woodbridge Holdings Corporation merged with and into
Woodbridge Holdings, LLC (Woodbridge), BFCs wholly-owned subsidiary which continued as the
surviving company of the merger and the successor entity to Woodbridge Holdings Corporation. As a
result of the merger, Woodbridge Holdings Corporations separate corporate existence ceased and its
Class A Common Stock is no longer publicly traded.
As BFC also previously disclosed, on November 16, 2009, an additional approximately 7.4
million shares of the common stock of Bluegreen was purchased for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $23 million. As a result, our ownership interest increased to approximately 16.9
million shares, or approximately 52%, of Bluegreens outstanding common stock. Accordingly, we are
now deemed to have a controlling interest in Bluegreen and, under generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP), Bluegreens results since November 16, 2009, the date of the share purchase,
are consolidated in BFCs financial statements. Prior to November 16, 2009, the approximate 29%
equity investment in Bluegreen was accounted for using the equity method. See Note 4 for additional
information about the Bluegreen share acquisition.
GAAP requires that BFC consolidate the financial results of the entities in which it has
controlling interest. As a consequence, the assets and liabilities of all such entities are
presented on a consolidated basis in BFCs financial statements. However, except as otherwise
noted, the debts and obligations of the consolidated entities, including Woodbridge, Core,
Bluegreen and BankAtlantic Bancorp, are not direct obligations of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC.
Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC absent a dividend or distribution
from those entities. The recognition by BFC of income from controlled entities is determined based
on the total percent of economic ownership in those entities. At March 31, 2010, we owned
approximately 36% of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A and Class B common stock, representing
approximately 65% of BankAtlantic Bancorps total voting power, and approximately 52% of
Bluegreens common stock.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with GAAP for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In managements
opinion, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments,
which include normal recurring adjustments, as are necessary for a fair statement of the Companys
consolidated financial condition at March 31, 2010; the consolidated results of operations,
comprehensive loss and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the
changes in consolidated equity for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Operating results for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2010. These unaudited consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current periods
presentation.
As a result of the Woodbridge merger on September 21, 2009 and the Bluegreen share acquisition
on November 16, 2009, in each case as described above, the Company reorganized its reportable
segments to better align its segments with the current operations of its businesses. The Companys
business activities currently consist of (i) Real Estate and Other Activities and (ii) Financial
Services Activities. The Company currently reports the results of operations of these business
activities through six reportable segments: BFC Activities, Real Estate Operations, Bluegreen
Resorts, Bluegreen Communities, BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company.
10
Table of Contents
As a result of this reorganization, our BFC Activities segment now includes activities
formerly reported in the Woodbridge Other Operations segment and our Real Estate Operations segment
is comprised of what was previously identified as the Land Division.
In December 2009, Core Communities reinitiated efforts to sell two of its commercial leasing
projects (the Projects). As a result of this decision, the assets associated with the Projects
have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. For further information
see Note 5.
2. | Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle |
On January 1, 2010, BFC, Bluegreen and BankAtlantic Bancorp adopted an amendment to the
accounting guidance for transfers of financial assets and an amendment to the accounting guidance
associated with the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIEs). As a result of the
adoption of these accounting standards, Bluegreen consolidated seven existing special purpose
finance entities (QSPEs) associated with prior securitization transactions which previously
qualified for off-balance sheet sales treatment, and BankAtlantic Bancorp consolidated its joint
venture that conducts a factoring business. Accordingly, Bluegreens special purpose finance
entities and BankAtlantic Bancorps factoring joint venture are now consolidated in BFCs financial
statements, and resulted in a one-time non-cash after-tax reduction to retained earnings of $2.1
million, representing the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle associated with the
consolidation of Bluegreens seven existing special purpose entities. No charges were recorded to
retained earnings in connection with the consolidation of BankAtlantic Bancorps factoring joint
venture.
The consolidation of Bluegreens special purpose finance entities resulted in the following
impacts to BFCs Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at January 1, 2010: (1) assets
increased by $413.8 million, primarily representing the consolidation of notes receivable, net of
allowance, partially offset by the elimination of retained interests; (2) liabilities increased by
$416.1 million, primarily representing the consolidation of non-recourse debt obligations to
securitization investors, partially offset by the elimination of certain deferred tax liabilities;
and (3) total equity decreased by approximately $2.3 million, including a decrease to
noncontrolling interest of approximately $1.1 million.
The impact of the adoption of the change in accounting principle on the related assets,
related liabilities, noncontrolling interests and total equity are as follows (in thousands):
Consolidation | ||||||||||||||||||||
BankAtlantic | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | Bluegreens | Bancorps | January 1, | |||||||||||||||||
2009 | QSPEs | Joint Venture (1) | Total | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
$ | 24,020 | 36,518 | | 36,518 | 60,538 | ||||||||||||||
Loans receivable |
3,678,894 | | 3,214 | 3,214 | 3,682,108 | |||||||||||||||
Notes receivable |
277,274 | 377,265 | | 377,265 | 654,539 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate inventory |
494,291 | 16,403 | | 16,403 | 510,694 | |||||||||||||||
Retained interest in notes receivable sold |
26,340 | (26,340 | ) | | (26,340 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates |
15,272 | | (3,256 | ) | (3,256 | ) | 12,016 | |||||||||||||
Other assets |
96,750 | 9,970 | 367 | 10,337 | 107,087 | |||||||||||||||
Change in related assets |
$ | 4,612,841 | 413,816 | 325 | 414,141 | 5,026,982 | ||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
$ | 186,453 | 3,544 | 18 | 3,562 | 190,015 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
31,204 | 1,233 | | 1,233 | 32,437 | |||||||||||||||
Receivable -backed notes payable |
237,416 | 411,369 | | 411,369 | 648,785 | |||||||||||||||
Change in related liabilities |
$ | 455,073 | 416,146 | 18 | 416,164 | 871,237 | ||||||||||||||
Total BFCs shareholders equity |
$ | 245,059 | (1,212 | ) | | (1,212 | ) | 243,847 | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
158,852 | (1,118 | ) | 307 | (811 | ) | 158,041 | |||||||||||||
Total equity |
$ | 403,911 | (2,330 | ) | 307 | (2,023 | ) | 401,888 | ||||||||||||
(1) | As a result of the adoption of the accounting guidance associated with the consolidation of VIEs, BFC consolidated BankAtlantic Bancorps factoring joint venture, BankAtlantic Business Capital, LLC (BBC). BankAtlantic Bancorp has restricted the funding to BBC for receivable factoring to a maximum of $5 million. Prior to January 1, 2010, the investment in BBC was accounted for using the equity method of accounting. |
11
Table of Contents
3. | Liquidity |
BFC
Except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen,
Woodbridge and Core are not direct obligations of BFC and generally are non-recourse to BFC.
Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC, absent a dividend or distribution
from those entities. BFCs principal sources of liquidity are its available cash, short-term
investments, dividends or distributions from our subsidiaries and dividends from Benihana. As
discussed further in this Report, recent tax law changes have resulted in the anticipated receipt
of significant tax refunds by our subsidiaries. We may use our available funds to make additional
investments in the companies within our consolidated group, invest in equity securities and other
investments or to otherwise fund operations. Since March 2009, BFC has not received cash
dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp and does not expect to receive cash dividends from BankAtlantic
Bancorp for the foreseeable future because BankAtlantic Bancorp is currently prohibited from paying
dividends on its common stock. Furthermore, certain of Bluegreens credit facilities contain
certain terms which might limit the payment of cash dividends.
We believe that our current financial condition and credit relationships, together with
anticipated cash flows from operations and other sources of funds, including anticipated tax
refunds due our subsidiaries and proceeds from the disposition of certain properties or investments, will provide for
anticipated near-term liquidity needs. With respect to our long-term liquidity requirements, in
addition to the foregoing BFC may seek funds through the issuance of long-term secured and
unsecured indebtedness, equity and/or debt securities or through the sale of assets, as determined
to be appropriate by the Company; however, there is no assurance that any of these alternatives
will be available to BFC on attractive terms, or at all, particularly if the adverse current
economic and financial market conditions continue.
Woodbridge
The development activities at Carolina Oak, which is within Tradition Hilton Head, were
suspended in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of, among other things, a further deterioration
in consumer confidence, an overall softening of demand for new homes, a decline in the overall
economy, increasing unemployment, a deterioration in the credit markets, and the direct and
indirect impact of the turmoil in the mortgage loan market. In 2009, the housing industry continued
to face significant challenges and Woodbridge made the decision to cease all activities at Carolina
Oak. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we reviewed the inventory of real estate at Carolina Oak for
impairment and as a result, recorded a $16.7 million impairment charge to adjust the carrying
amount of Carolina Oaks inventory to its fair value of $10.8 million. Furthermore, Woodbridge is
the obligor under a $37.2 million loan that is collateralized by the Carolina Oak property. During
2009, the lender declared the loan to be in default. Subsequently, the lender was taken over by
the FDIC and accordingly, the FDIC now holds the loan. While there may have been an issue with
respect to compliance with certain covenants in the loan agreements, we do not believe that an
event of default had occurred as was alleged. Woodbridge is negotiating with representatives of the
FDIC in an effort to bring about a satisfactory conclusion with regard to that debt. However, the
outcome of the negotiations is uncertain.
As previously disclosed, under Florida law, holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock who
did not vote to approve the merger between Woodbridge and BFC and properly asserted and exercised
their appraisal rights with respect to their shares (Dissenting Holders) are entitled to receive
a cash payment in an amount equal to the fair value of their shares as determined in accordance
with the provisions of Florida law in lieu of the shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock which they
would otherwise have been entitled to receive. Dissenting Holders, who collectively held
approximately 4.2 million shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, have rejected Woodbridges
offer of $1.10 per share and requested payment for their shares based on their respective fair
value estimates of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. Woodbridge is currently a party to legal
proceedings relating to the Dissenting Holders appraisal process. In December 2009, a $4.6 million
liability was recorded with a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in capital which is
reflected in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition representing in the
aggregate Woodbridges offer to the Dissenting Holders. However, the appraisal rights litigation
is currently ongoing and its outcome is uncertain. As a result, there is no assurance as to the
amount of cash that we will be required to pay to the Dissenting Holders, which amount may be
greater than the $4.6 million that we have accrued.
Core Communities
During 2009, the recession continued and the demand for residential and commercial inventory
showed no signs of recovery, particularly in the geographic regions where Cores properties are
located. The decrease in land sales in 2009 and continued cash flow deficits contributed to,
among other things, the deterioration of Cores liquidity. As a result, Core has severely limited
its development expenditures in Tradition, Florida and has
12
Table of Contents
completely discontinued development activity in Tradition Hilton Head. Its assets have been
impaired significantly and in an effort to bring about an orderly liquidation without a bankruptcy
filing, Core commenced negotiations with all of its lenders and is seeking to liquidate its assets in an orderly
way. Core is currently in default under the terms of all of its outstanding debt totaling
approximately $139.0 million (excluding loans associated with assets held for sale of $71.4
million). Core continues to pursue all options with its lenders, including offering deeds in lieu
and other similar transactions wherein Core would relinquish title to substantially all of its
assets. During February 2010, with Cores concurrence, a significant portion of the land in
Tradition Hilton Head was placed under the control of a court appointed receiver. In connection
with the receivership, Core entered into a separate agreement with the lender that, among other
things, grants Core a right of first refusal to purchase the $25.3 million loan in the event that
the lender decides to sell the loan to a third party. This loan is collateralized by inventory with
a carrying value of $33.0 million, net of impairment charges of approximately $29.6 million in
2009. Separately, on April 7, 2010, and April 8, 2010, another of Cores lenders filed a
foreclosure action in South Carolina and Florida, respectively, seeking foreclosure of mortgage
loans totaling approximately $113.7 million, plus additional interest and costs and expenses,
including attorney fees. As of March 31, 2010, the carrying value of Cores inventory
collateralizing the defaulted loans that are the subject of the
foreclosure proceedings was $82.9 million, net of impairment charges during 2009 of approximately $33.7 million. There was no impairment
charge in the three months ended March 31, 2010. While negotiations with its lenders continue,
there is no assurance that Core will be successful in reaching any agreement with its lenders with
respect to resolution of these obligations.
In December 2009, Core reinitiated efforts to sell the Projects and began soliciting bids from
several potential buyers to purchase the assets associated with the Projects. Core has accepted an
offer to sell the Projects, which has been approved by the lender with substantially all of the
proceeds going to satisfy Cores obligations to the lender, and Core believes that it is probable
that it will sell the Projects in 2010. However, there is no assurance that the transaction will
close or that Core will be released from its obligations. As of the date of this filing, the sale
was still in the due diligence phase. See Note 5 for further information regarding the Projects.
Core is also a party to a certain Development Agreement with the city of Hardeeville, SC,
under which Core is obligated to fund $1 million towards the building of a fire station. Funding
was scheduled in three installments: the first installment of $100,000 was due October 21, 2009;
the second installment of $450,000 was due on January 1, 2010; and the final installment was due on
April 1, 2010. Additionally, Core was obligated to fund certain staffing costs of $200,000 under
the terms of this agreement. Core did not pay any of the required installments and has not funded
the $200,000 payment for staffing. On November 5, 2009, Core received a notice of default from the
city for non payment. Core is in discussions with one of its lenders to fund the required payments
out of an interest reserve account established under its loan agreement with that lender while it
seeks to resolve this issue. However, in the event that Core is unable to obtain additional funds
to make these payments, it may be unable to cure the default on its obligation to the city, which
could result in a loss of entitlements associated with the development project.
Based on an ongoing evaluation of its cost structure and in light of current market
conditions, Core reduced its head count by 41 employees during 2009, resulting in approximately
$1.3 million of severance charges recorded during the fourth quarter of 2009. In the first quarter
of 2010, severance related payments at Core totaled approximately $577,000.
The negative impact of the adverse real estate market conditions on Core, together with Cores
limited liquidity, have caused substantial doubt regarding Cores ability to continue as a going
concern if Woodbridge chooses not to provide Core with the cash needed to meet its obligations when
and as they arise. Woodbridge has not committed to fund any of Cores obligations or cash
requirements, and it is not currently anticipated that Woodbridge will provide additional funds to
Core. Cores results are reported in the Real Estate Operations segment in Note 18. Cores
financial information included in the consolidated financial statements has been prepared assuming
that Core will meet its obligations and continue as a going concern. As a result, the consolidated
financial statements and the financial information provided for Core do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
13
Table of Contents
BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic
Both BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and BankAtlantic actively manage liquidity and cash
flow needs. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company had cash of $5.1 million as of March 31, 2010, does
not have debt maturing until March 2032 and has the ability to defer interest payments on its
junior subordinated debentures until December 2013; however, based on current interest rates,
accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $72.3 million would be due in December 2013 if
interest is deferred until that date. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys operating expenses for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $1.6 million and $1.7 million, respectively,
and its non-interest income was $0.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively. At March 31, 2010,
other assets included BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys $5.2 million receivable from the sale
of a non-performing loan. The cash from the sale of the loan was received in April 2010.
BankAtlantics liquidity is dependent, in part, on its ability to maintain or increase deposit
levels and the availability of borrowings under its lines of credit and Treasury and Federal
Reserve lending programs. As of March 31, 2010, BankAtlantic had $444 million of cash and
approximately $802 million of available unused borrowings, consisting of $644 million of unused
FHLB line of credit capacity, $73 million of unpledged securities, and $85 million of available
borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve. However, such available borrowings are subject to
periodic reviews and may be terminated, suspended or reduced at any time. Additionally, interest
rate changes, additional collateral requirements, disruptions in the capital markets or
deterioration in BankAtlantics financial condition may reduce the amounts it is able to borrow or
make terms of the borrowings and deposits less favorable. As a result, the cost of funds may
increase and the availability of funding sources may decrease.
The substantial uncertainties throughout the Florida and national economies and U.S. banking
industry coupled with current market conditions have adversely affected BankAtlantic Bancorps and
BankAtlantics results. As of March 31, 2010, BankAtlantics capital was in excess of all
regulatory well capitalized levels. However, the OTS, at its discretion, can at any time require
an institution to maintain capital amounts and ratios above the established well capitalized
requirements based on its view of the risk profile of the specific institution. BankAtlantics
communications with the OTS include providing information on an ad-hoc, one-time or regular basis
related to areas of regulatory oversight and bank operations. As part of such communications,
BankAtlantic has provided to its regulators forecasts, strategic business plans and other
information relating to anticipated asset balances, asset quality, capital levels, expenses,
anticipated earnings, levels of brokered deposits and liquidity, and has indicated that
BankAtlantic has no plans to pay dividends to BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company. If higher
capital requirements are imposed by its regulators, BankAtlantic could be required to raise
additional capital. If BankAtlantic is required to raise additional capital, there is no assurance
that BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company or BankAtlantic would be successful in raising additional
capital on favorable terms or at all. Although BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic have
experienced operating losses since June 2007, BankAtlantic maintains capital at well capitalized
levels and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company believes that it maintains sufficient liquidity to
fund operations at least through March 31, 2011. However, if unanticipated market factors emerge
and/or BankAtlantic Bancorp is unable to execute its plans or if BankAtlantic or BankAtlantic
Bancorp requires capital and BankAtlantic Bancorp is unable to raise capital, it could have a
material adverse impact on BankAtlantic Bancorps business, results of operations and financial
condition.
4. | Bluegreen Share Acquisition |
On November 16, 2009, approximately 7.4 million shares of the common stock of Bluegreen were
purchased for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $23 million, increasing our interest
from 9.5 million shares, or 29%, of Bluegreens common stock to 16.9 million shares, or 52%, of
Bluegreens common stock which represents a controlling interest in Bluegreen. As a result, the
Company consolidates all of Bluegreens wholly-owned subsidiaries and entities in which Bluegreen
holds a controlling financial interest. The Company also consolidates Bluegreen/Big Cedar
Vacations, LLC (the Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture), in which Bluegreen holds a 51% equity
interest, has an active role as the day-to-day manager of its activities, and has majority voting
control of its management committee. The operating results of Bluegreen are included in the
Companys Bluegreen Resorts and Bluegreen Communities segments.
As part of the accounting for the November 2009 Bluegreen share purchase acquisition,
management is continuing to evaluate the fair value of Bluegreens inventory and certain of
Bluegreens contracts, and as such, certain amounts at December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010 are
estimates and are subject to revision as more detailed analyses are completed and additional
information becomes available. Any change resulting from the final evaluation of the inventory and
contracts of Bluegreen as of the acquisition date may change the amount of the $183.1 million
bargain purchase gain recorded during the fourth quarter of 2009.
14
Table of Contents
5. | Discontinued Operations |
Real Estate
Core Communities
In December 2009, Core Communities reinitiated efforts to sell the Projects and began
soliciting bids for the immediate sale of the Projects in their present condition from several
potential buyers. As indicated below, Core has determined that it is probable that it will sell the
Projects in 2010. Due to this decision, the assets associated with the Projects that are for sale
have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented in accordance with the
accounting guidance for the disposal of long-lived assets.
The assets were reclassified as assets held for sale and the liabilities related to these
assets were reclassified as liabilities related to assets held for sale in the Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition. Additionally, the results of operations for the Projects were
reclassified to income from discontinued operations. Depreciation related to these assets held for
sale ceased in December 2009. The Company has elected not to separate these assets in the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the periods presented. Management reviewed the net asset
value and estimated the fair market value of the assets based on the bids received related to these
assets and determined that an impairment charge was necessary to write down the aggregate carrying
value of the Projects to fair value less the estimated costs to sell and, accordingly, recorded an
impairment charge of approximately $13.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2009. As of March 31,
2010, the Company determined that these assets were appropriately recorded at the lower of cost or
fair value less the costs to sell.
The following table summarizes information regarding the assets held for sale and liabilities
related to the assets held for sale for the Projects as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in
thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Restricted cash |
$ | 1,191 | 538 | |||||
Property and equipment, net |
61,608 | 61,588 | ||||||
Other assets |
8,494 | 9,774 | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
$ | 71,293 | 71,900 | |||||
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other |
$ | 1,764 | 1,602 | |||||
Notes and mortgage payable |
74,533 | 74,749 | ||||||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
$ | 76,297 | 76,351 | |||||
15
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the results of operations for the Projects (in thousands):
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenue and other income |
$ | 1,834 | 2,002 | |||||
Costs and expenses |
2,083 | 2,806 | ||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(249 | ) | (804 | ) | ||||
Benefit for income taxes |
| | ||||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
$ | (249 | ) | (804 | ) | |||
Core is the obligor under $71.4 million of loans as of March 31, 2010, which are
collateralized by the Projects and these loans are currently in default. Core has accepted an
offer to sell the Projects, which has been approved by the lender. It is anticipated that
substantially all of the proceeds from the sale will be paid to the lender in satisfaction of
Cores obligations to the lender. However, there can be no assurance that the transaction will
close or that Core will be released from its obligations. As of the date of this filing, the sale was still in the due diligence phase.
Financial Services
On February 28, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp sold Ryan Beck to Stifel. The Stifel sales
agreement provided for contingent earn-out payments, payable in cash or shares of Stifel common
stock, at Stifels election, based on certain defined Ryan Beck revenues during the two-year
period immediately following the Ryan Beck sale, which ended on February 28, 2009. The contingent
earn-out payments were accounted for when earned as additional proceeds from the sale of Ryan Beck
common stock. BankAtlantic Bancorp received additional earn-out consideration of $4.2 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
6. | Fair Value Measurement |
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
There are three main valuation techniques to measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities:
the market approach, the income approach and the cost approach. The accounting literature defines
an input fair value hierarchy that has three broad levels and gives the highest priority to quoted
prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest
priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).
The valuation techniques are summarized below:
The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market
transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
The income approach uses financial models to convert future amounts to a single present
amount. These valuation techniques include present value and option-pricing models.
The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the
service capacity of an asset. This technique is often referred to as current replacement costs.
The input fair value hierarchy is summarized below:
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at each reporting date. An active market for
the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with
sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. A quoted price
in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and is used to measure fair
value whenever available.
Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a
specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of
the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include: Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in
active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that
16
Table of Contents
are
not active, that is, markets in which there are few transactions for the asset or liability, the
prices are not current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market
makers (for example, some brokered
markets), or in which little information is released publicly (for example, a
principal-to-principal market); inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset
or liability (for example, interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals,
volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks, and default rates).
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are
only used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby
allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or
liability at the measurement date.
The following table presents major categories of the Companys assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis at March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
March 31, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Description | 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 152,594 | | 152,594 | | |||||||||||
REMICS (1) |
89,648 | | 89,648 | | ||||||||||||
Bonds |
250 | | | 250 | ||||||||||||
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock |
20,247 | | | 20,247 | ||||||||||||
Other equity securities |
15,737 | 15,737 | | | ||||||||||||
Total securities available for sale
at fair value |
$ | 278,476 | 15,737 | 242,242 | 20,497 | |||||||||||
The following table presents major categories of the Companys assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
Quoted prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
December 31, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Description | 2009 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 211,945 | | 211,945 | | |||||||||||
REMICS (1) |
107,347 | | 107,347 | | ||||||||||||
Bonds |
250 | | | 250 | ||||||||||||
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock |
17,766 | | | 17,766 | ||||||||||||
Other equity securities |
9,067 | 9,067 | | | ||||||||||||
Total securities available for sale
at fair value |
346,375 | 9,067 | 319,292 | 18,016 | ||||||||||||
Retained interest in notes
receivable sold |
26,340 | | | 26,340 | ||||||||||||
Total assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis |
$ | 372,715 | 9,067 | 319,292 | 44,356 | |||||||||||
(1) | Real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICS) are pass-through entities that hold residential loans. Investors in these entities are issued ownership interests in the entities in the form of a bond. The securities are guaranteed by government agencies. |
There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the Companys financial
statements.
17
Table of Contents
The following table presents major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (in
thousands):
Retained | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interests in | Benihana | |||||||||||||||||||||
Notes | Convertible | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||
Receivable Sold | Bonds | Preferred Stock | Securities | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 26,340 | 250 | 17,766 | | 44,356 | ||||||||||||||||
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle (1) |
(26,340 | ) | | | | (26,340 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive
income |
| | 2,481 | | 2,481 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
$ | | 250 | 20,247 | | 20,497 | ||||||||||||||||
(1) | Retained interests in notes receivable sold was eliminated upon a change in accounting principle. For further information see Note 2. |
The following table presents major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (in
thousands):
Benihana | ||||||||||||||||
Convertible | Equity | |||||||||||||||
Bonds | Preferred Stock | Securities | Total | |||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 250 | 16,426 | 1,588 | 18,264 | |||||||||||
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
Included in earnings |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive loss |
| (42 | ) | (336 | ) | (378 | ) | |||||||||
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
$ | 250 | 16,384 | 1,252 | 17,886 | |||||||||||
The valuation techniques and the inputs used in our financial statements to measure the fair
value of our recurring financial instruments are described below.
The fair values of mortgage-backed and real estate mortgage conduit securities are estimated
using independent pricing sources and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing uses a market approach
valuation technique and Level 2 valuation inputs as quoted market prices are not available for the
specific securities that BankAtlantic Bancorp owns. The independent pricing sources value these
securities using observable market inputs including: benchmark yields, reported trades,
broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads and other reference data in the secondary institutional
market which is the principal market for these types of assets. To validate fair values obtained
from the pricing sources, BankAtlantic Bancorp reviews fair value estimates obtained from brokers,
investment advisors and others to determine the reasonableness of the fair values obtained from
independent pricing sources. BankAtlantic Bancorp reviews any price that it determines may not be
reasonable and requires the pricing sources to explain the differences in fair value or reevaluate
its fair value.
Bonds and equity securities are generally fair valued using the market approach and quoted
market prices (Level 1) or matrix pricing (Level 2 or Level 3) with inputs obtained from
independent pricing sources to value bonds and equity securities, if available. Also non-binding
broker quotes are obtained to validate fair values obtained from matrix pricing. However, for
certain equity and debt securities in which observable market inputs cannot be obtained, these
securities are valued either using the income approach and pricing models that BankAtlantic Bancorp
developed or based on observable market data that BankAtlantic Bancorp has adjusted based on
managements judgment of the factors a market participant would use to value the securities (Level
3).
The estimated fair value of the Companys investment in Benihanas Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock (Convertible Preferred Stock) was assessed using the income approach with Level 3
inputs by discounting future cash flows at a market discount rate combined with the fair value of
the underlying shares of Benihanas common stock that BFC would receive upon conversion of its
shares of Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock.
18
Table of Contents
The following table presents major categories of assets measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | Significant | Impairments | |||||||||||||||||
As of | for Identical | Other Observable | Unobservable | For the Three | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
Description | 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | March 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Loans measured for impairment
using the fair value of the
collateral |
$ | 189,832 | | | 189,832 | 21,581 | ||||||||||||||
Impaired real estate owned |
665 | | | 665 | 143 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 190,497 | | | 190,497 | 21,724 | ||||||||||||||
The following table presents major categories of assets measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2009 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | Significant | Impairments | |||||||||||||||||
As of | for Identical | Other Observable | Unobservable | For the Three | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
Description | 2009 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Loans measured for
impairment using the
fair value of the collateral |
$ | 36,208 | | | 36,208 | 9,860 | ||||||||||||||
Impaired real estate owned |
1,590 | | | 1,590 | 211 | |||||||||||||||
Impaired goodwill |
| | | | 8,541 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 37,798 | | | 37,798 | 18,612 | ||||||||||||||
There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in the Companys
financial statements.
Loans Receivable Measured For Impairment
Impaired loans receivable are generally valued based on the fair value of the underlying
collateral. BankAtlantic Bancorp primarily uses third party appraisals to assist in measuring
non-homogenous impaired loans. These appraisals generally use the market or income approach
valuation technique and use market observable data to formulate an opinion of the fair value of the
loans collateral. However, the appraiser uses professional judgment in determining the fair value
of the collateral or properties, and these values may also be adjusted for changes in market
conditions subsequent to the appraisal date. When current appraisals are not available for certain
loans receivable, judgment on market conditions is used to adjust the most current appraisal. The
sales prices may reflect prices of sales contracts not closed, and the amount of time required to
sell out the real estate project may be derived from current appraisals of similar projects. As a
consequence, the calculation of the fair value of the collateral uses Level 3 inputs. BankAtlantic
Bancorp generally uses third party broker price opinions or an automated valuation service to measure the
fair value of the collateral for impaired homogenous loans in the establishment of specific
reserves or charge-downs when these loans become 120 days delinquent. The third party valuations
from real estate professionals use Level 3 inputs in the determination of the fair values.
Impaired Real Estate Owned
Real estate owned is generally valued with the assistance of third party appraisals or broker
price opinions. These appraisals generally use the market approach valuation technique and use
market observable data to formulate an opinion of the fair value of the properties. However, the
appraiser or brokers use professional judgment in determining the fair value of the properties and
these values may also be adjusted for changes in market conditions
subsequent to the valuation date when current appraisals are not available. As a consequence
of using broker price opinions and adjustments to appraisals, the fair values of the properties use
Level 3 inputs in the determination of fair value.
19
Table of Contents
Impaired Goodwill
In determining the fair value of BankAtlantic Bancorps reporting units in the test of
goodwill for impairment, BankAtlantic Bancorp uses discounted cash flow valuation techniques. This
method requires assumptions for expected cash flows and applicable discount rates. The aggregate
fair value of all reporting units derived from the above valuation methodology was compared to
BankAtlantic Bancorps market capitalization adjusted for a control premium in order to determine
the reasonableness of the financial model output. A control premium represents the value an
investor would pay above minority interest transaction prices in order to obtain a controlling
interest in the respective company. BankAtlantic Bancorp used financial projections over a period
of time considered necessary to achieve a steady state of cash flows for each reporting unit. The
primary assumptions in the projections include anticipated growth in loan, tax certificates,
securities, interest rates and revenue. The discount rates are estimated based on a Capital Asset
Pricing Model, which considers the risk-free interest rate, market risk premium, beta, and
unsystematic risk and size premium adjustments specific to a particular reporting unit. The
estimated fair value of a reporting unit is highly sensitive to changes in the discount rate and
terminal value assumptions and, accordingly, minor changes in these assumptions could significantly
impact the fair value assigned to a reporting unit. Future potential changes in these assumptions
may impact the estimated fair value of a reporting unit and cause the fair value of the reporting
unit to be below its carrying value. As a result of the significant judgments used in determining
the fair value of the reporting units, the fair values of the reporting units use Level 3 inputs in
the determination of fair value.
Goodwill of $12.2 million associated with BankAtlantic Bancorps capital services reporting unit was
determined not to be impaired and is included on the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The capital services goodwill was tested for
potential impairment on September 30, 2009 (the annual testing date). There were no events that
occurred since the annual testing date that BankAtlantic Bancorp believes would more likely than not reduce
the carrying value of BankAtlantic Bancorps capital services reporting unit below its fair value.
Financial Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following table presents information for financial instruments at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||||||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 516,860 | 516,860 | 315,580 | 315,580 | |||||||||||
Federal funds sold and short-term investments |
500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
53,178 | 53,178 | 24,020 | 24,020 | ||||||||||||
Securities available for sale |
278,476 | 278,476 | 346,375 | 346,375 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities |
1,981 | 1,981 | 9,654 | 9,654 | ||||||||||||
Tax Certificates |
88,438 | 90,130 | 110,991 | 112,472 | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
48,751 | 48,751 | 48,751 | 48,751 | ||||||||||||
Retained interest in notes receivable sold |
| | 26,340 | 26,340 | ||||||||||||
Loans receivable including loans held for sale, net |
3,504,955 | 3,223,475 | 3,683,441 | 3,381,796 | ||||||||||||
Notes receivable |
626,131 | 660,000 | 277,274 | 277,274 | ||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 4,042,689 | 4,044,226 | 3,948,818 | 3,950,840 | |||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
152,008 | 152,009 | 282,012 | 282,912 | ||||||||||||
Short term borrowings |
27,302 | 27,302 | 27,271 | 27,271 | ||||||||||||
Receivable-backed notes payable |
619,563 | 598,319 | 237,416 | 237,416 | ||||||||||||
Notes and mortgage notes payable and other borrowings |
381,260 | 379,147 | 395,361 | 392,047 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage payables associated with assets held for sale |
74,533 | 74,533 | 74,749 | 74,749 | ||||||||||||
Junior subordinated debentures |
450,374 | 191,156 | 447,211 | 170,598 |
20
Table of Contents
Management of the respective consolidated companies have made estimates of fair value that they
believe to be reasonable. However, because there is no active market for many of these financial
instruments and management has derived the fair value of the majority of these financial
instruments using the income and market approach
techniques with Level 3 unobservable inputs, there is no assurance that the Company or its
subsidiaries would receive the estimated value upon sale or disposition of the asset. Management
estimates used in net present value financial models rely on assumptions and judgments regarding
issues where the outcome is unknown and actual results or values may differ significantly from
these estimates. These fair value estimates do not consider the tax effect that would be associated
with the disposition of the assets or liabilities at their fair value estimates.
Fair values are estimated for loan portfolios with similar financial characteristics. Loans
are segregated by category, and each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable
rate interest terms and by performing and non-performing categories.
The fair value of performing loans is calculated by using an income approach with Level 3
inputs. The fair value of performing loans is estimated by discounting forecasted cash flows
through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the interest rate
risk inherent in the loan portfolio. The estimate of average maturity is based on BankAtlantic
Bancorps historical experience with prepayments for each loan classification, modified as required, by an
estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions. Management of BankAtlantic
Bancorp assigns a credit risk premium and an illiquidity adjustment to these loans based on risk grades.
The fair value of tax certificates was calculated using the income approach with Level 3
inputs. The fair value is based on discounted expected cash flows using discount rates that take
into account the risk of the cash flows of tax certificates relative to alternative investments.
The fair value of FHLB stock is considered to be its carrying amount.
The fair values of Bluegreen notes receivable are based on estimated future cash flows
considering contractual payments and estimates of prepayments and defaults, discounted at a market
rate.
As permitted by applicable accounting guidance, the fair value of deposits with no stated
maturity, such as non-interest bearing demand deposits, savings and NOW accounts, and money market
and checking accounts, is shown in the above table to equal to book value. The fair value of
certificates of deposit is based on an income approach with Level 3 inputs. The fair value is
calculated by the discounted value of contractual cash flows with the discount rate estimated using
current rates offered by BankAtlantic for similar remaining maturities.
The fair value of short-term borrowings is calculated using the income approach with Level 2
inputs. Contractual cash flows are discounted based on current interest rates. The carrying value
of these borrowings approximates fair value as maturities are generally less than thirty days.
The fair value of FHLB advances was calculated using the income approach with Level 2 inputs.
The fair value was based on discounted cash flows using rates offered for debt with comparable
terms to maturity and issuer credit standing.
The estimated fair values of notes and mortgage notes payable and other borrowings, including
receivable-backed notes payable were based upon current rates and spreads it would pay to obtain
similar borrowings and also used discounted values of contractual cash flows at a market discount
rate.
The fair value of BankAtlantic Bancorps mortgage-backed bond as of December 31, 2009 was based on
discounted values of contractual cash flows at a market discount rate. The mortgage-backed bonds
were retired during the three months ended March 31, 2010 resulting in a $7,000 loss.
In determining the fair value of BankAtlantic Bancorps junior subordinated debentures,
BankAtlantic Bancorp used NASDAQ price quotes available with respect to its $63.4 million of
publicly traded trust preferred securities related to its junior subordinated debentures (public
debentures). However, $248.3 million of the outstanding trust preferred securities related to its
junior subordinated debentures are not traded, but are privately held in pools with no liquidity or
readily determinable source for valuation (private debentures). BankAtlantic Bancorp has deferred
the payment of interest with respect to all of its junior subordinated debentures as permitted by
the terms of these securities. Based on the deferral status and the lack of liquidity and ability
of a holder to actively sell such private debentures, the fair value of these private debentures
may be subject to a greater discount to par and have a lower fair value than indicated by the
public debenture price quotes. However, due to their private nature and the lack of a trading
market, fair value of the private debentures was not readily determinable at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, and as a practical expedient, BankAtlantic Bancorp used the NASDAQ price quotes
of the
public debentures to value its remaining outstanding junior subordinated debentures whether
privately held or publicly traded.
21
Table of Contents
The estimated fair value of Woodbridges and Bluegreens junior subordinated debentures as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows
at a market discount rate or market price quotes from the over-the-counter bond market.
The carrying amount and fair values of BankAtlantics commitments to extend credit, standby
letters of credit, financial guarantees and forward commitments are not considered significant.
(See Note 19 for the contractual amounts of BankAtlantics financial instrument commitments.)
7. | Securities Available for Sale |
The following tables summarize securities available for sale (in thousands):
As of March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Government agency securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 145,943 | 6,651 | | 152,594 | |||||||||||
Real estate mortgage investment conduits (1) |
86,544 | 3,104 | | 89,648 | ||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
232,487 | 9,755 | | 242,242 | ||||||||||||
Investment Securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Other bonds |
250 | | | 250 | ||||||||||||
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock |
16,426 | 3,821 | | 20,247 | ||||||||||||
Equity and other securities |
15,580 | 161 | 4 | 15,737 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
32,256 | 3,982 | 4 | 36,234 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 264,743 | 13,737 | 4 | 278,476 | |||||||||||
As of December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Government agency securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 202,985 | 8,961 | 1 | 211,945 | |||||||||||
Real estate mortgage investment conduits (1) |
104,329 | 3,037 | 19 | 107,347 | ||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
307,314 | 11,998 | 20 | 319,292 | ||||||||||||
Investment Securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Other bonds |
250 | | | 250 | ||||||||||||
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock |
16,426 | 1,340 | | 17,766 | ||||||||||||
Equity and other securities |
8,947 | 126 | 6 | 9,067 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
25,623 | 1,466 | 6 | 27,083 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 332,937 | 13,464 | 26 | 346,375 | |||||||||||
(1) | Real estate mortgage investment conduits are pass-through entities that hold residential loans. Investors in these entities are issued ownership interests in the entities in the form of a bond. The securities are guaranteed by government agencies. |
22
Table of Contents
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Companys
securities available for sale with unrealized losses that are deemed temporary, aggregated by
investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
As of March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities available for sale |
$ | | | 6 | (4 | ) | 6 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | | | 159 | (1 | ) | 159 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage
investment conduits |
| | 21,934 | (19 | ) | 21,934 | (19 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
4 | (6 | ) | | | 4 | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total available for sale securities: |
$ | 4 | (6 | ) | 22,093 | (20 | ) | 22,097 | (26 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized losses on debt securities outstanding greater than twelve months at December 31,
2009 were primarily caused by changes in interest rates. These securities, which are guaranteed by
government sponsored enterprises, are of high credit quality, and management of BankAtlantic
Bancorp believes that these securities may recover their losses in the foreseeable future. Further,
management of BankAtlantic Bancorp does not currently intend to sell these debt securities and
believes it will not be required to sell these debt securities before the price recovers.
Accordingly, BankAtlantic Bancorp does not consider these investments other-than-temporarily
impaired at March 31, 2010.
The scheduled maturities of debt securities available for sale were (in thousands):
Debt Securities | ||||||||
Available for Sale | ||||||||
Estimated | ||||||||
Amortized | Fair | |||||||
March 31, 2010 (1) (2) | Cost | Value | ||||||
Due within one year |
$ | 251 | 251 | |||||
Due after one year, but within five years |
42 | 43 | ||||||
Due after five years, but within ten years |
29,787 | 30,732 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
202,657 | 211,466 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 232,737 | 242,492 | |||||
(1) | Scheduled maturities in the above table may vary significantly from actual maturities due to prepayments. | |
(2) | Scheduled maturities are based upon contractual maturities. |
Included in Financial Services securities activities, net in the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Operations were (in thousands):
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Gross gains on securities sales |
$ | 3,138 | 4,440 | |||||
Gross losses on securities sales |
| | ||||||
Proceed from sales of securities |
46,907 | 162,170 | ||||||
23
Table of Contents
BFC Benihana Investment
The Company owns 800,000 shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock. The Convertible
Preferred Stock is convertible into an aggregate of 1,578,943 shares of Benihanas Common Stock at
a conversion price of $12.67, subject to adjustment from time to time upon certain defined events.
Based on the number of currently outstanding shares of Benihanas capital stock, the Convertible
Preferred Stock, if converted, would represent an approximately 19% voting interest and an
approximately 9% economic interest in Benihana.
The Convertible Preferred Stock was acquired pursuant to an agreement with Benihana on June 8,
2004 to purchase an aggregate of 800,000 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock for $25.00 per
share. The shares of the Convertible Preferred Stock have voting rights on an as if converted
basis together with Benihanas Common Stock on all matters put to a vote of the holders of
Benihanas Common Stock. The approval of a majority of the holders of the Convertible Preferred
Stock then outstanding, voting as a single class, are required for certain events outside the
ordinary course of business. Holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive
cumulative quarterly dividends at an annual rate equal to $1.25 per share, payable on the last day
of each calendar quarter. The Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory redemption at the
original issue price of $20 million plus accumulated dividends on July 2, 2014 unless BFC elects to
extend the mandatory redemption date to a later date not to extend beyond July 2, 2024. At March
31, 2010, the closing price of Benihanas Common Stock was $6.83 per share. The market value of
the Convertible Preferred Stock if converted at March 31, 2010 would have been approximately $10.8
million.
At March 31, 2010, the Companys estimated fair value of its investment in Benihanas
Convertible Preferred Stock was approximately $20.2 million, which includes a gross unrealized gain
of approximately $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The estimated fair value
of the Companys investment in Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock was assessed using the income
approach with Level 3 inputs by discounting future cash flows at a market discount rate combined
with the fair value of the underlying shares of Benihanas Common Stock that BFC would receive upon
conversion of its shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock.
8. | Loans Receivable |
The consolidated loan portfolio consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Real estate loans: |
||||||||
Residential |
$ | 1,459,969 | 1,538,906 | |||||
Builder land loans |
30,279 | 57,807 | ||||||
Land acquisition and development |
151,150 | 182,235 | ||||||
Land acquisition, development and construction |
20,195 | 26,184 | ||||||
Construction and development |
197,373 | 211,809 | ||||||
Commercial |
696,188 | 688,386 | ||||||
Consumer home equity |
653,809 | 669,690 | ||||||
Small business |
211,523 | 213,591 | ||||||
Other loans: |
||||||||
Commercial business |
137,764 | 155,226 | ||||||
Small business non-mortgage |
97,371 | 99,113 | ||||||
Consumer loans |
15,907 | 15,935 | ||||||
Deposit overdrafts |
3,420 | 4,816 | ||||||
Total gross loans |
3,674,948 | 3,863,698 | ||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||
Premiums, discounts and net deferred fees |
2,574 | 2,414 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(177,597 | ) | (187,218 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable net |
$ | 3,499,925 | 3,678,894 | |||||
Loans held for sale |
$ | 5,030 | 4,547 | |||||
24
Table of Contents
Loans held for sale at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are loans originated through the
assistance of an independent mortgage company. The mortgage company provides processing and
closing assistance to BankAtlantic. Pursuant to an agreement between the parties, the mortgage
company purchases the loans from BankAtlantic within a defined period of time after the date of
funding. BankAtlantic earns the interest income during the period that BankAtlantic owns the loan.
Gains from the sale of loans held for sale were $54,000 and $112,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
BankAtlantic Bancorp sold builder land bank loans and land acquisition and development loans
for net proceeds of $26.4 million resulting in charge-offs of $19.6 million. BankAtlantic Bancorp
had established $17.7 million of specific valuation allowances on these loans as of December 31,
2009.
Undisbursed loans in process consisted of the following components (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Construction and development |
$ | 41,838 | 43,432 | |||||
Commercial |
36,583 | 25,696 | ||||||
Total undisbursed loans in process |
$ | 78,421 | 69,128 | |||||
Allowance for Loan Losses (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 187,218 | 137,257 | |||||
Loans charged-off |
(41,423 | ) | (23,929 | ) | ||||
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off |
1,047 | 792 | ||||||
Net charge-offs |
(40,376 | ) | (23,137 | ) | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
30,755 | 44,277 | ||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 177,597 | 158,397 | |||||
The following summarizes impaired loans (in thousands):
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Recorded | Specific | Recorded | Specific | |||||||||||||
Investment | Allowances | Investment | Allowances | |||||||||||||
Impaired loans with specific
valuation allowances |
$ | 280,556 | 73,179 | 249,477 | 70,485 | |||||||||||
Impaired loans without specific
valuation allowances |
183,038 | | 196,018 | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 463,594 | 73,179 | 445,495 | 70,485 | |||||||||||
Impaired loans without specific valuation allowances represent loans that were written-down to
the fair value of the collateral less cost to sell, loans in which the collateral value less cost
to sell was greater than the carrying value of the loan, loans in which the present value of the
cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate was equal to or greater than the
carrying value of the loan, or large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are
collectively measured for impairment.
BankAtlantic Bancorp continuously monitors collateral dependent loans and performs an
impairment analysis on these loans quarterly. Generally, a full appraisal is obtained when a real
estate loan becomes impaired and an updated full appraisal is obtained within one year from the
prior appraisal date, or earlier if management deems it appropriate based on significant changes in
market conditions. In instances where a property is in the process of foreclosure, an updated
appraisal may be postponed beyond one year, as an appraisal is required on the date of foreclosure;
however, such loans are subject to quarterly impairment analyses. Included in total impaired loans
as of March 31, 2010 was $215.3 million of collateral dependent loans, of which $155.6 million were
measured for impairment using current appraisals and $59.7 million were measured by adjusting
appraisals, as appropriate, to reflect changes in market conditions subsequent to the appraisal
date. Appraised values were adjusted down by an aggregate amount of $5.7 million to reflect
current market conditions on 17 loans due to property value declines since the last appraisal
dates.
25
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2010, impaired loans with specific valuation allowances had been previously
written down by $57.5 million and impaired loans without specific valuation allowances had been
previously written down by $75.4 million. BankAtlantic had commitments to lend $3.8 million of
additional funds on impaired loans as of March 31, 2010.
Interest income which would have been recorded under the contractual terms of impaired loans
and the interest income actually recognized were (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, | |||||||||
2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
Contracted interest income |
$ | 5,677 | 5,097 | ||||||
Interest income recognized |
(244 | ) | (694 | ) | |||||
Foregone interest income |
$ | 5,433 | 4,403 | ||||||
9. | Notes Receivable |
The table below sets forth additional information relative to Bluegreen notes receivable (in
thousands).
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Notes receivable, gross |
$ | 779,599 | 356,133 | |||||
Discount on notes receivable |
(72,352 | ) | (74,873 | ) | ||||
Notes receivable, net of discount |
707,247 | 281,260 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(81,116 | ) | (3,986 | ) | ||||
Notes receivable, net |
$ | 626,131 | 277,274 | |||||
The
discount on the purchase price related to notes receivable acquired
on November 16, 2009 is being accreted using the effective interest
method and recognized as interest income over the life of the loans.
As a result, the Company recognized $2.5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010.
The table below sets forth the activity in the allowance for uncollectible notes receivable
during the three months ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ | 3,986 | ||
One-time impact of the amendment to the accounting
guidance for transfer of financial assets and the
amendment to the accounting guidance for the
consolidation of VIEs (see Note 2) |
86,252 | |||
Provision for loan losses |
4,847 | |||
Write-offs of uncollectible receivables |
(13,969 | ) | ||
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
$ | 81,116 | ||
The weighted-average interest rate on Bluegreen notes receivable was 15.1% and 14.8% at March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Bluegreen notes receivables are secured by vacation
ownership interests (VOIs) and by homesites. All of its VOI notes receivable, which comprise the
majority of the notes receivable, bear interest at fixed rates. The weighted-average interest rate
charged on loans secured by VOIs was 15.2% and 14.9% at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Approximately 85.9% of Bluegreen notes receivable secured by home sites bear interest
at variable rates, while the balance bears interest at fixed rates. The weighted-average interest
rate charged on loans secured by home sites was 8.2% and 8.8% at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively.
Bluegreens VOI notes receivable are generally secured by property located in Florida,
Louisiana, Nevada, New Jersey, Michigan, Missouri, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Virginia, Wisconsin, and Aruba. The majority of Bluegreen Communities notes receivables are secured
by home sites in Georgia, Texas, and Virginia.
26
Table of Contents
10. | Variable Interest Entities Bluegreen |
In accordance with the guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities, Bluegreen
analyzes its variable interests, including loans, guarantees, and equity investments, to determine
if an entity in which it has a variable interest is a variable interest entity. Bluegreens
analysis includes both quantitative and qualitative reviews. Bluegreen bases its quantitative
analysis on the forecasted cash flows of the entity, and it bases its qualitative analysis on its
review of the design of the entity, its organizational structure including decision-making ability,
and relevant financial agreements. Bluegreen also uses its qualitative analyses to determine if it
must consolidate a variable interest entity as the primary beneficiary.
Bluegreen sells, without recourse, through special purpose finance entities, VOI notes
receivable originated by Bluegreen Resorts. These transactions provide liquidity for Bluegreen and
transfer the economic risks and certain of the benefits of the notes receivable to third parties.
In a securitization, various classes of debt securities are issued by the special purpose finance
entities that are generally collateralized by a single tranche of transferred assets, which consist
of VOI notes receivable. Bluegreen services the notes receivable for a fee. With each
securitization, Bluegreen generally retains a portion of the securities.
Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles that existed prior to 2010, seven of
Bluegreens eight special purpose finance entities met the definition of a qualified special
purpose entity, and Bluegreen was not required to consolidate those seven entities in its financial
statements. Upon the adoption of the new accounting topics related to transfers of financial
assets (see Note 2 for additional information), Bluegreen was required to evaluate these entities
for consolidation. Since Bluegreen created these entities to serve as a financing vehicle for
holding assets and related liabilities, and the entities have no equity investment at risk, they
are considered variable interest entities. Furthermore, since Bluegreen continues to service the
notes and retain rights to receive benefits that are potentially significant to the entities,
Bluegreen has concluded that it is the entities primary beneficiary and, therefore, now
consolidates these entities into its financial statements. Please see Note 2 for the impact of
initial consolidation of these entities.
At March 31, 2010, the principal balance of VOI notes receivable included within the Companys
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition that are collateral for the variable interest
entities obligations totaled $601.1 million. In addition, approximately $36.5 million of
Bluegreens restricted cash is held in accounts for the benefit of the variable interest entities.
Further, at March 31, 2010, the carrying amount of the consolidated liabilities included within the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition for these variable interest entities
totaled $516.3 million, comprised of non-recourse receivable-backed notes payable. The debt of
these entities is generally non-recourse to Bluegreen. See Note 14 below under the heading
Receivable-Backed Notes Payable.
Under the terms of Bluegreens timeshare note sales, Bluegreen has the right at its option to
repurchase defaulted mortgage notes at the outstanding principal balance plus accrued interest or,
in some facilities, at 24% of the original sale price associated with the defaulted mortgage note.
The transaction documents typically limit such repurchases to 15-20% of the receivables originally
funded into the transaction. Voluntary repurchases by Bluegreen of defaulted notes during the first
quarter of 2010 were $14.1 million.
11. | Real Estate Inventory |
Real estate held for development and sale consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Land and land development costs |
$ | 259,157 | 264,454 | |||||
Bluegreen resorts |
237,418 | 222,026 | ||||||
Other costs |
464 | 552 | ||||||
Land and facilities held for sale |
8,027 | 7,259 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 505,066 | 494,291 | |||||
27
Table of Contents
Inventory consisted of the combined real estate assets of Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen
Communities, Core Communities, Carolina Oak, BankAtlantic
Bancorps residential construction development
acquired in 2002 and BankAtlantic Bancorp land facilities held for sale.
As a result of Bluegreens continued low sales volume, reduced prices, and the impact of
reduced sales on the forecasted sell-out period of its projects, the Company recorded non-cash
charges to cost of real estate sales of approximately $3.0 million, net of purchase accounting
adjustments, during the first quarter of 2010, to write-down the inventory balances of certain
phases of Bluegreens completed properties to their estimated net realizable value.
12. | Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates |
As previously discussed, approximately 7.4 million additional shares of Bluegreens common
stock were purchased on November 16, 2009, increasing our ownership in Bluegreen to 16.9 million
shares, or 52% of Bluegreens outstanding common stock. As a result of the purchase, the Company
has a controlling interest in Bluegreen and, accordingly, has consolidated Bluegreens results
since November 16, 2009 into the Companys financial statements.
Prior to November 16, 2009, the investment in Bluegreen was accounted for using the equity
method of accounting. The cost of the Bluegreen investment was adjusted to recognize the Companys
interest in Bluegreens earnings or losses. The difference between a) the Companys ownership
percentage in Bluegreen multiplied by its earnings and b) the amount of the Companys equity in
earnings of Bluegreen as reflected in the Companys financial statements related to the
amortization or accretion of purchase accounting made at the time of the initial acquisition of
Bluegreens common stock and a basis difference due to impairment charges recorded on the
investment in Bluegreen, as described below. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009,
a $20.4 million impairment charge was recorded and earnings of $6.3 million recognized on its equity method
investment in Bluegreen.
The following table shows the reconciliation of the Companys pro rata share of Bluegreens
net income to the Companys share of total earnings from Bluegreen (in thousands):
March 31, | ||||
2009 | ||||
Pro rata share of Bluegreens net income |
$ | 1,082 | ||
Amortization of basis difference (a) |
5,254 | |||
Total earnings from Bluegreen Corporation |
$ | 6,336 | ||
(a) | As a result of the impairment charges previously taken, a basis difference was created between the investment in Bluegreen and the underlying assets and liabilities carried on the books of Bluegreen. Therefore, earnings from Bluegreen are adjusted each period to reflect the amortization of this basis difference. As such, a methodology was established to allocate the impairment loss to the relative estimates of the fair value of Bluegreens underlying assets based upon the position that the impairment loss was a reflection of the perceived value of these underlying assets. The appropriate amortization was calculated based on the useful lives of the underlying assets and other relevant data associated with each asset category. |
13. | Goodwill |
The Company tests goodwill for potential impairment annually or during interim periods if
impairment indicators exist. In response to the deteriorating economic and real estate
environments and the effects that the external environment had on BankAtlantic
Bancorps business units,
BankAtlantic has reduced its asset balances with a view toward strengthening its regulatory
capital ratios and revised its projected operating results to reflect a smaller organization.
Based on the results of an interim goodwill impairment evaluation undertaken during the first
quarter of 2009, an impairment charge of $8.5 million, net of purchase accounting from the step
acquisition of approximately $0.6 million, was recorded during the three months ended March 31,
2009. No such impairments were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
28
Table of Contents
14. | Debt |
Woodbridge
The development activities at Carolina Oak, which is within Tradition Hilton Head, were
suspended in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of, among other things, a further deterioration
in consumer confidence, an overall softening of demand for new homes, a decline in the overall
economy, increasing unemployment, a deterioration in the credit markets, and the direct and
indirect impact of the turmoil in the mortgage loan market. In 2009, the housing industry continued
to face significant challenges and Woodbridge made the decision to cease all activities at Carolina
Oak. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we reviewed the inventory of real estate at Carolina Oak for
impairment and as a result, recorded a $16.7 million impairment charge to adjust the carrying
amount of Carolina Oaks inventory to its fair value of $10.8 million. Furthermore, Woodbridge is
the obligor under a $37.2 million loan that is collateralized by the Carolina Oak property. During
2009, the lender declared the loan to be in default. Subsequently, the lender was taken over by
the FDIC and accordingly, the FDIC now holds the loan. While there may have been an issue with
respect to compliance with certain covenants in the loan agreements, we do not believe that an
event of default had occurred as was alleged. Woodbridge is negotiating with representatives of the
FDIC in an effort to bring about a satisfactory conclusion with regard to that debt. However, the
outcome of the negotiations is uncertain.
Core
Core is currently in default under the terms of all of its outstanding debt totaling
approximately $139.0 million (excluding loans associated with assets held for sale of $71.4
million). Core continues to pursue all options with its lenders, including offering deeds in lieu
and other similar transactions wherein Core would relinquish title to substantially all of its
assets. During February, 2010, with Cores concurrence, a significant portion of the land in
Tradition Hilton Head had been placed under the control of a court appointed receiver. In
connection with the receivership, Core entered into a separate agreement with the lender that,
among other things, grants Core a right of first refusal to purchase the $25.3 million loan in the
event that the lender decides to sell the loan to a third party. This loan is collateralized by
inventory with a carrying value of $33.0 million, net of impairment charges of approximately $29.6
million in 2009. Separately, on April 7, 2010, and April 8, 2010, another of Cores lenders filed a
foreclosure action in South Carolina and Florida, respectively, seeking foreclosure of mortgage
loans totaling approximately $113.7 million, plus additional interest and costs and expenses,
including attorney fees. As of March 31, 2010, the carrying value of Cores inventory
collateralizing the defaulted loans that are part of the foreclosure
proceedings was $82.9 million,
net of impairment charges during 2009 of approximately $33.7 million. There was no impairment
charge in the three months ended March 31, 2010. While negotiations with its lenders continue,
there is no assurance that Core will be successful in reaching any agreement with its lenders with
respect to resolution of these obligations.
Core Communities land acquisition and development mortgage notes payable are collateralized
by inventory of real estate with approximate net carrying values aggregating $116.0 million and
$116.9 million as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Cores credit agreements
had no availability as of March 31, 2010.
Bluegreen
Bluegreens pledged assets under its facilities and notes payable as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 had a carrying amount of approximately $325.1 million and $336.6 million,
respectively.
The GMAC AD&C Facility. During the first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen repaid $8.2 million of the
outstanding balance under this facility. As of March 31, 2010, Bluegreen had no availability under
this facility.
The GMAC Communities Facility. During the first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen repaid $1.6
million on this facility. As of March 31, 2010, Bluegreen had no availability under this facility.
29
Table of Contents
During April 2010, GMAC assigned all rights, title, and interest in the GMAC Communities
Facility to
H4BG, LP. This assignment did not affect any of the material financial terms of the loan agreement
and this facility will subsequently be known as the H4BG Communities Facility.
The Wachovia Notes Payable. As of March 31, 2010, Bluegreen had approximately $21.9 million
of outstanding debt to Wachovia Bank, N.A. (Wachovia) under various notes payable collateralized
by certain of Bluegreens timeshare resorts or sales offices (the Wachovia Notes Payable).
During the first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen made a required principal payment of $2.6 million
related to the various Wachovia Note Payable loans. In April 2010, Bluegreen executed an agreement
with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, the parent Company of Wachovia (Wells Fargo) to refinance the
remaining $21.9 million outstanding under the Wachovia Notes Payable into a new term loan. See
Wells Fargo Term Loan below for further details.
The Wachovia Line-of-Credit. As of March 31, 2010, Bluegreen had an unsecured line-of-credit
with Wachovia. Amounts borrowed under the line bear interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 1.75% (2.00% at
March 31, 2010). Interest is due monthly. During the first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen repaid $1.2
million on this line-of-credit. In April 2010, the remaining $14.5 million was refinanced by Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. See Wells Fargo Term Loan below for further details.
The Wells Fargo Term Loan. On April 30, 2010, Bluegreen entered into a definitive agreement
with Wells Fargo, which amended, restated and consolidated Bluegreens notes payable to Wachovia
and the line-of-credit issued by Wachovia into a single term loan with Wells Fargo (the Wells
Fargo Term Loan). As described above, the notes payable and line of credit which were consolidated
into the Wells Fargo Term Loan had a total outstanding balance of $36.4 million as of April 30,
2010. In connection with the closing of the Wells Fargo Term Loan, Bluegreen made a principal
payment of $0.4 million, reducing the balance to $36.0 million, and paid accrued interest on the
existing Wachovia debt. The Wells Fargo Term Loan is scheduled to mature on April 30, 2012 and
bears interest at 30-day LIBOR + 6.87%. Principal payments will be effected through agreed-upon
release prices as real estate collateralizing the Wells Fargo Term Loan is sold, subject to minimum
required amortization of $5.2 million in 2010, $10.6 million in 2011 and $20.2 million in 2012. In
addition to the resort projects previously pledged as collateral for the various notes payable to
Wachovia, Bluegreen pledged additional timeshare interests, resorts real estate, and the residual
interests in certain of Bluegreens sold VOI notes receivables as collateral for the Wells Fargo
Term Loan. Wells Fargo has the right to receive as additional collateral the residual interest in
one future transaction which creates such a retained interest. The Wells Fargo Term loan contains
certain financial and non-financial covenants that Bluegreen believes are typical to these types of
transactions.
Receivable-Backed Notes Payable
Bluegreens pledged receivables under its receivable-backed notes payable as of March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009 had a principal balance before purchase accounting adjustments of
approximately $724.6 million and $292.9 million, respectively.
Liberty Bank Facility. During the first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen pledged $8.3 million of
VOI notes receivable to this facility and received cash proceeds of $7.5 million. Bluegreen also
made repayments of $4.7 million on the facility during the first quarter of 2010. In April 2010,
Bluegreen transferred $1.2 million of VOI notes receivable to Liberty and received cash proceeds of
$1.1 million.
GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Receivables Facility. During the first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen
repaid $2.4 million on this facility.
The Wells Fargo Facility. During the first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen repaid $3.1 million on
this facility.
BB&T Purchase Facility. During the first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen did not pledge any VOI
notes receivable to this facility. Bluegreen made repayments of $9.0 million on the facility
during the first quarter of 2010.
As discussed further in Notes 2 and 10 above, on January 1, 2010, Bluegreen consolidated its
special purpose finance entities and associated receivable-backed notes payable. These entities
and its associated debt were not required to be consolidated during periods prior to January 1,
2010. Historically, Bluegreen has been a party to a number of securitization-type transactions, in
which it sold receivables to one of its special purpose finance entities which, in turn, sold the
receivables either directly to third parties or to a trust established for the transaction. The
receivables were sold on a non-recourse basis (except for breaches of certain representations and
warranties). Under
30
Table of Contents
these arrangements, the cash payments received from obligors on the receivables sold are generally
applied monthly to pay fees to service providers, make interest and principal payments to
investors, fund required reserves, if any, with the remaining balance of such cash retained by
Bluegreen; however, to the extent the portfolio of receivables fails to satisfy specified
performance criteria (as may occur due to an increase in default rates or loan loss severity) or
other trigger events, the funds received from obligors are distributed on an accelerated basis to
investors. Depending on the circumstances and the transaction, the application of the accelerated
payment formula may be permanent or temporary until the trigger event is cured. As of March 31,
2010, Bluegreen was in compliance with all applicable terms and no trigger events had occurred.
The table below sets forth the balances as of March 31, 2010 of Bluegreens receivable-back
notes payable facilities previously reported as off-balance sheet (in thousands):
As of | ||||||||
March 31, 2010 | ||||||||
Non-recourse receivable-backed notes | ||||||||
payable previously reported as off-balance | ||||||||
sheet (except for the BB&T Purchase facility): | Debt Balance | Interest Rate | ||||||
BB&T Purchase Facility |
$ | 122,302 | 5.75 | % | ||||
GE 2004 Facility |
11,611 | 7.16 | % | |||||
2004 Term Securitization |
24,894 | 5.27 | % | |||||
2005 Term Securitization |
70,682 | 5.98 | % | |||||
GE 2006 Facility |
58,505 | 7.35 | % | |||||
2006 Term Securitization |
64,001 | 6.16 | % | |||||
2007 Term Securitization |
119,531 | 7.32 | % | |||||
2008 Term Securitization |
44,807 | 7.88 | % | |||||
Total |
$ | 516,333 | ||||||
Junior Subordinated Debentures
As more fully disclosed in Note 23 Junior Subordinated Debentures to the Companys audited
consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009, some of the Companys subsidiaries have formed statutory business trusts
(collectively, the Trusts), each of which issued trust preferred securities and invested the
proceeds thereof in its junior subordinated debentures. The Trusts are variable interest entities
in which the Companys subsidiaries are not the primary beneficiaries as defined by the accounting
guidance for consolidation. Accordingly, the Company does not consolidate the operations of the
Trusts; instead, the Trusts are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Interest on
the junior subordinated debentures and distributions on the trust preferred securities are payable
quarterly in arrears at the same interest rate.
On March 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by the Levitt Capital Trust
(LCT) I contractually changed from a fixed-rate of 8.11% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month
LIBOR + 3.85% (4.14% as of March 31, 2010).
On July 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by the LCT II is contractually
scheduled to change from a fixed- rate of 8.09% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR +
3.80%.
On March 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by the Bluegreen Statutory Trust
(BST) I contractually changed from a fixed-rate of 9.160% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month
LIBOR + 4.90% (5.19% as of March 31, 2010).
On July 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by the BST II and the BST III are
contractually scheduled to change from a fixed- rate of 9.158% and 9.193%, respectively, to a
variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR + 4.85%.
31
Table of Contents
15. | Development Bonds Payable |
In connection with the development of certain of Cores projects, community development,
special assessment or improvement districts have been established and may utilize tax-exempt bond
financing to fund construction or acquisition of certain on-site and off-site infrastructure
improvements near or at these communities. The obligation to pay principal and interest on the
bonds issued by the districts is assigned to each parcel within the district, and a priority
assessment lien may be placed on benefited parcels to provide security for the debt service. The
bonds, including interest and redemption premiums, if any, and the associated priority lien on the
property are typically payable, secured and satisfied by revenues, fees, or assessments levied on
the property benefited. Core is required to pay the revenues, fees, and assessments levied by the
districts on the properties it still owns that are benefited by the improvements. Core may also be
required to pay down a specified portion of the bonds at the time each unit or parcel is sold. The
costs of these obligations are capitalized to inventory during the development period and
recognized as cost of sales when the properties are sold.
Cores bond financing at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of district bonds
totaling $218.7 million at each of these dates with outstanding amounts of approximately $165.8
million and $170.8 million, respectively. Bond obligations at March 31, 2010 mature in 2035 and
2040. As of March 31, 2010, Core owned approximately 16% of the property subject to assessments
within the community development district and approximately 91% of the property subject to
assessments within the special assessment district. During each of the three months ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, Core recorded a liability of approximately $159,000 in assessments on property
owned by it in the districts. Core is responsible for any assessed amounts until the underlying
property is sold and will continue to be responsible for the annual assessments through the
maturity dates of the respective bonds issued if the property is never sold. Based on Cores
approximate 91% ownership of property within the special assessment district as of March 31, 2010,
it will be responsible for the payment of approximately $10 million in assessments by March 2011.
If Core sells land within the special assessment district and reduces its ownership percentage, the
potential payment of approximately $10 million would decrease in relation to the decrease in the
ownership percentage. In addition, Core has guaranteed payments for assessments under the district
bonds in Tradition, Florida which would require funding if future assessments to be allocated to
property owners are insufficient to repay the bonds. Management has evaluated this exposure based
upon the criteria in accounting guidance for contingencies, and has determined that there have been
no substantive changes to the projected density or land use in the development subject to the bond
which would make it probable that Core would have to fund future shortfalls in assessments.
A liability was recorded for the estimated developer obligations that are fixed and
determinable and user fees that are required to be paid or transferred at the time the parcel or
unit is sold to an end user. At each of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the liability related
to developer obligations associated with Cores ownership of the property was $3.3 million, of
which $3.1 million is included in the liabilities related to assets held for sale in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
16. | Interest Expense |
The following table is a summary of the Companys consolidated interest expense and the
amounts capitalized (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended, | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Real Estate and Other: |
||||||||
Interest incurred on borrowings |
$ | 20,002 | 3,882 | |||||
Interest capitalized |
(71 | ) | (1,634 | ) | ||||
19,931 | 2,248 | |||||||
Financial Services: |
||||||||
Interest on deposits |
7,057 | 12,987 | ||||||
Interest on advances from FHLB |
958 | 7,164 | ||||||
Interest on short term borrowings |
8 | 172 | ||||||
Interest on debentures and bonds payable |
3,821 | 4,452 | ||||||
11,844 | 24,775 | |||||||
Total interest expense |
$ | 31,775 | 27,023 | |||||
32
Table of Contents
17. | Noncontrolling Interests |
The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests held by others in the Companys
subsidiaries at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp |
$ | 74,886 | 88,910 | |||||
Bluegreen |
38,535 | 41,905 | ||||||
Joint ventures |
29,353 | 28,037 | ||||||
$ | 142,774 | 158,852 | ||||||
The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests (loss) earnings recognized by
others with respect to the Companys subsidiaries for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Noncontrolling interest Continuing Operations |
||||||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp |
$ | (13,019 | ) | (32,649 | ) | |||
Woodbridge |
| 11,910 | ||||||
Bluegreen |
(2,796 | ) | | |||||
Joint ventures |
1,150 | (219 | ) | |||||
$ | (14,665 | ) | (20,958 | ) | ||||
Noncontrolling interest Discontinued Operations: |
||||||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp |
$ | | 2,943 | |||||
Woodbridge |
| (614 | ) | |||||
$ | | 2,329 | ||||||
$ | (14,665 | ) | (18,629 | ) | ||||
18. | Segment Reporting |
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in
assessing performance and deciding how to allocate resources. Reportable segments consist of one or
more operating segments with similar economic characteristics, products and services, production
processes, type of customer, distribution system or regulatory environment.
The information provided for segment reporting is based on internal reports utilized by
management of the Company and its respective subsidiaries. The presentation and allocation of
assets and results of operations may not reflect the actual economic costs of the segments as stand
alone businesses. If a different basis of allocation were utilized, the relative contributions of
the segments might differ but the relative trends in segments operating results would, in
managements view, likely not be impacted.
As a result of the Woodbridge merger on September 21, 2009 and the Bluegreen share acquisition
on November 16, 2009, in each case as described above, the Company reorganized its reportable
segments to better align its segment reporting with the current operations of its businesses. The
Companys business activities currently consist of (i) Real Estate and Other activities and (ii)
Financial Services activities. These business activities are reported through six segments: BFC
Activities, Real Estate Operations, Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen Communities, BankAtlantic and
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company. As a result of this reorganization, our BFC Activities segment
now includes, in addition to other activities historically included in this segment, Woodbridge
Other Operations (which was previously a separate segment). Our Real Estate Operations segment is
now comprised of what was previously identified as our Land Division, including the real estate
business activities of Core Communities and Carolina Oak.
33
Table of Contents
BFCs consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of Bluegreen since
November 16, 2009 (when we acquired a controlling interest in Bluegreen), and Bluegreens results of operations
are reported through the Bluegreen Resorts and Bluegreen Communities segments. Prior to November
16, 2009, we owned approximately 9.5 million shares of Bluegreens common stock, representing
approximately 29% of such stock, the investment in Bluegreen was accounted for under the equity
method of accounting, and our interest in Bluegreens earnings and losses was included in our BFC
Activities segment. The Companys Financial Services business activities include BankAtlantic
Bancorps results of operations and are reported in two segments: BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic
Bancorp Parent Company.
The presentation and allocation of the assets, liabilities and results of operations of each
segment may not reflect the actual economic costs of the segment as a stand-alone business. If a
different basis of allocation were utilized, the relative contributions of the segment might differ
but, in managements view, the relative trends in segments would not likely be impacted. The
accounting policies of the segments are generally the same as those described in the summary of
significant accounting policies in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Intersegment transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The Company
evaluates segment performance based on its segment net income (loss).
The following summarizes the aggregation of the Companys operating segments into reportable
segments:
BFC Activities
The BFC Activities segment consists of BFC operations, our investment in Benihana, and other
operations of Woodbridge described below. BFC operations primarily consists of our corporate
overhead and general and administrative expenses, including the expenses of Woodbridge, the
financial results of a venture partnership that BFC controls and other equity investments, as well
as income and expenses associated with BFCs shared service operations which provides services in
the areas of human resources, risk management, investor relations, executive office administration
and other services to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen. This segment also includes investments
made by BFC/CCC, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary (BFC/CCC). Other operations includes the
consolidated operations of Pizza Fusion Holdings, Inc. (Pizza Fusion), a restaurant franchisor
operating within the quick service and organic food industries, the activities of Cypress Creek
Capital Holdings, LLC (Cypress Creek Capital) and Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC (Snapper
Creek) and other investments. In addition, prior to obtaining a controlling interest in Bluegreen
on November 16, 2009, we accounted for our investment in Bluegreen under the equity method of
accounting and our interest in Bluegreens earnings or loss was included in the BFC Activities
segment.
Real Estate Operations
The Companys Real Estate Operations segment consists of the operations of Core Communities,
Carolina Oak, which was engaged in homebuilding activities in South Carolina prior to the
suspension of those activities in the fourth quarter of 2008, and Cypress Creek Holdings which
engages in leasing activities.
Bluegreen Resorts
Bluegreen Resorts develops markets and sells VOIs in its resorts through the Bluegreen
Vacation Club, and provides resort management services to resort property owners associations.
Bluegreen Communities
Bluegreen Communities acquires large tracts of real estate, which are subdivided, improved (in
some cases to include a golf course on the property and other related amenities) and sold,
typically on a retail basis as homesites.
BankAtlantic
The Companys BankAtlantic segment consists of the banking operations of BankAtlantic.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company segment consists of the operations of BankAtlantic Bancorp
Parent Company, including the cost of acquisitions, asset and capital management and financing
activities.
34
Table of Contents
The table below sets forth the Companys segment information as of and for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
BankAtlantic | Unallocated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bancorp | Amounts | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BFC | Real estate | Bluegreen | Bluegreen | Parent | and | Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | Activities | Operations | Resorts | Communities | BankAtlantic | Company | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of real estate |
$ | | | 14,929 | 3,666 | | | | 18,595 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other resorts and communities operations revenue |
| | 15,670 | 351 | | | | 16,021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other real estate revenues |
387 | 637 | 10,180 | | | | (17 | ) | 11,187 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
| | | | 47,231 | 78 | 30,305 | 77,614 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Services non-interest income |
| | | | 28,741 | 458 | (436 | ) | 28,763 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
387 | 637 | 40,779 | 4,017 | 75,972 | 536 | 29,852 | 152,180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sale of real estate |
| | 3,108 | 5,788 | | | | 8,896 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sale of other revenues |
| | 11,943 | 747 | | | | 12,690 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,838 | 1,983 | | | 8,256 | 3,563 | 16,135 | 31,775 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision/(reversal of provision) for loan losses |
| | | | 32,034 | (1,279 | ) | | 30,755 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
6,487 | 2,659 | 29,814 | 2,652 | | | 13,042 | 54,654 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | | | 52,721 | 1,644 | (355 | ) | 54,010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
8,325 | 4,642 | 44,865 | 9,187 | 93,011 | 3,928 | 28,822 | 192,780 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in (loss) earnings from unconsolidated
affiliates |
(31 | ) | | | | | | 35 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
1,394 | 53 | | | | | (693 | ) | 754 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
(6,575 | ) | (3,952 | ) | (4,086 | ) | (5,170 | ) | (17,039 | ) | (3,392 | ) | 372 | (39,842 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
(198 | ) | | | | 90 | | (4,483 | ) | (4,591 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(6,377 | ) | (3,952 | ) | (4,086 | ) | (5,170 | ) | (17,129 | ) | (3,392 | ) | 4,855 | (35,251 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
| (249 | ) | | | | | | (249 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (6,377 | ) | (4,201 | ) | (4,086 | ) | (5,170 | ) | (17,129 | ) | (3,392 | ) | 4,855 | (35,500 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(14,665 | ) | (14,665 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
$ | 19,520 | (20,835 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 117,380 | 255,510 | 915,826 | 106,150 | 4,688,001 | 432,225 | (164,352 | ) | 6,350,740 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
35
Table of Contents
BankAtlantic | Unallocated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Bancorp | Amounts | |||||||||||||||||||||||
BFC | Real estate | Parent | and | Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | Activities | Operations | BankAtlantic | Company | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of real estate |
$ | | 1,427 | | | | 1,427 | |||||||||||||||||
Other resorts and communities operations revenue |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other real estate revenues |
299 | 602 | | | (9 | ) | 892 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
| | 62,409 | 209 | 290 | 62,908 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial Services non-interest income |
| | 32,787 | 342 | (329 | ) | 32,800 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
299 | 2,029 | 95,196 | 551 | (48 | ) | 98,027 | |||||||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sale of real estate |
| 693 | | | | 693 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sale of other revenues |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
889 | 1,359 | 20,640 | 4,230 | (95 | ) | 27,023 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
| | 43,520 | 757 | | 44,277 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
6,993 | 4,438 | | | (476 | ) | 10,955 | |||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | 71,703 | 1,704 | (851 | ) | 72,556 | |||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
7,882 | 6,490 | 135,863 | 6,691 | (1,422 | ) | 155,504 | |||||||||||||||||
Gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridges subsidiary |
26,985 | | | | 13,384 | 40,369 | ||||||||||||||||||
Earnings in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates |
6,265 | | 78 | 118 | 34 | 6,495 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates |
(20,401 | ) | | | | | (20,401 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Impairment of investments |
(2,396 | ) | | | | | (2,396 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other income |
1,445 | 284 | | | (748 | ) | 981 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
4,315 | (4,177 | ) | (40,589 | ) | (6,022 | ) | 14,044 | (32,429 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
4,315 | (4,177 | ) | (40,589 | ) | (6,022 | ) | 14,044 | (32,429 | ) | ||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
| (804 | ) | | 4,201 | | 3,397 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 4,315 | (4,981 | ) | (40,589 | ) | (1,821 | ) | 14,044 | (29,032 | ) | |||||||||||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(18,629 | ) | (18,629 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to BFC |
$ | 32,673 | (10,403 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 186,696 | 378,424 | 5,488,603 | 506,711 | (447,980 | ) | 6,112,454 | ||||||||||||||||
36
Table of Contents
19. | Commitments, Contingencies and Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk |
BFC
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that
owns two commercial properties in Hillsborough County, Florida. At March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, the carrying amount of this investment was approximately $664,000 and $690,000, respectively,
which is included in investments in unconsolidated affiliates in the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition. In connection with the purchase of the commercial properties in
November 2006, BFC and the unaffiliated member each guaranteed the payment of up to a maximum of
$5.0 million each for certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are not
related to the financial performance of the assets. BFC and the unaffiliated member also entered
into a cross indemnification agreement which limits BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts
of BFC and its affiliates.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 50% limited partner interest in a limited
partnership that has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owns an office building in
Tampa, Florida. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying amount of this investment
was approximately $314,000 and $319,000, respectively, which is included in investments in
unconsolidated affiliates in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. In
connection with the purchase of the office building by the limited liability company in June 2007,
BFC guaranteed the payment of certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are
not related to the financial performance of the asset up to a maximum of $15.0 million, or $25.0
million in the event of any petition or involuntary proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or
similar state insolvency laws or in the event of any transfers of interests not in accordance with
the loan documents. BFC and the unaffiliated members also entered into a cross indemnification
agreement which limits BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates.
No amounts are recorded in the Companys financial statements for the obligations associated
with the above guarantees based on the potential indemnification by unaffiliated members and the
limit of the specific obligations to non-financial matters.
Based on the current accounting guidance associated with the consolidation of variable
interest entities implemented on January 1, 2010, we are not classified as primary beneficiaries in
connection with the above mentioned BFC/CCC investments and do not consolidate these entities into
BFCs financial statements. We do not have the power to direct the activities that can
significantly impact the performance of these entities.
Core
At each of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Core had outstanding surety bonds of
approximately $860,000, which were related primarily to its obligations to various governmental
entities to construct improvements in its various communities. It is estimated that approximately
$495,000 of work remains to complete these improvements and it is not currently anticipated that
any outstanding surety bonds will likely be drawn upon.
37
Table of Contents
Woodbridge
Levitt and Sons had approximately $33.3 million of surety bonds related to its ongoing
projects at the time of the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases. In the event that these obligations
are drawn and paid by the surety, Woodbridge could be responsible for up to $8.0 million plus costs
and expenses in accordance with the surety indemnity agreements executed by Woodbridge. At each of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Woodbridge had $527,000 in surety bond accruals related to
certain bonds where management believes it to be probable that Woodbridge will be required to
reimburse the surety under applicable indemnity agreements. Woodbridge reimbursed the surety
approximately $37,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2009, in accordance with the
indemnity agreement for bond claims paid during the period, while no reimbursements were made in
the three months ended March 31, 2010. It is unclear whether and to what extent the remaining
outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be
responsible for additional amounts beyond this accrual. There is no assurance that Woodbridge will
not be responsible for amounts in excess of the $527,000 accrual. Woodbridge will not receive any
repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery of any amounts it may be required to pay. In
September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require Woodbridge to post collateral against a portion
of the surety bonds exposure in connection with demands made by a municipality. Woodbridge believes
that the municipality does not have the right to demand payment under the bonds and Woodbridge
initiated a lawsuit against the municipality. Woodbridge does not believe a loss is probable and
accordingly has not accrued any amount related to this claim. However, based on claims made on the
bonds, the surety requested that Woodbridge post a $4.0 million escrow deposit as security while
the matter is litigated with the municipality, and Woodbridge has complied with that request.
As previously disclosed, under Florida law, holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock who
did not vote to approve the merger between Woodbridge and BFC and properly asserted and exercised
their appraisal rights with respect to their shares (Dissenting Holders) are entitled to receive
a cash payment in an amount equal to the fair value of their shares as determined in accordance
with the provisions of Florida law in lieu of the shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock which they
would otherwise have been entitled to receive. Dissenting Holders, who collectively held
approximately 4.2 million shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, have rejected Woodbridges
offer of $1.10 per share and requested payment for their shares based on their respective fair
value estimates of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. Woodbridge is currently a party to legal
proceedings relating to the Dissenting Holders appraisal process. In December 2009, a $4.6 million
liability was recorded with a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in capital which is
reflected in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition representing in the
aggregate Woodbridges offer to the Dissenting Holders. However, the appraisal rights litigation
is currently ongoing and its outcome is uncertain. As a result, there is no assurance as to the
amount of cash that we will be required to pay to the Dissenting Holders, which amount may be
greater than the $4.6 million that we have accrued.
Bluegreen
Bluegreen entered into a separation agreement with its former CEO, George Donovan. Under the
terms of this agreement, Mr. Donovan will be paid a total of $3.0 million over a seven year period
ending December 31, 2013 in exchange for his services to be available on a when and if needed
basis. As of March 31, 2010, the remaining amount due to Mr. Donovan was $1.4 million, the present
value of which is recorded as a liability on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition.
In the ordinary course of its business, Bluegreen becomes subject to claims or proceedings
from time to time relating to the purchase, subdivision, sale or financing of real estate.
Additionally, from time to time, Bluegreen becomes involved in disputes with existing and former
employees, vendors, taxing jurisdictions and various other parties. Unless otherwise described in
Note 23, Bluegreen believes that these claims are routine litigation incidental to its business.
BankAtlantic Bancorp
Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk were (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Commitments to sell fixed rate residential loans |
$ | 19,956 | 23,255 | |||||
Commitments to originate loans held for sale |
14,926 | 18,708 | ||||||
Commitments to originate loans held to maturity |
13,871 | 43,842 | ||||||
Commitments to extend credit, including the undisbursed
portion of loans in process |
403,163 | 396,627 | ||||||
Standby letters of credit |
16,658 | 13,573 | ||||||
Commercial lines of credit |
92,579 | 74,841 |
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by BankAtlantic to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. BankAtlantics standby letters of credit are generally
issued to customers in the construction industry guaranteeing project performance. These types of
standby letters of credit had a maximum exposure of $14.4 million at March 31, 2010. BankAtlantic
also issues standby letters of credit to commercial lending customers guaranteeing the payment of
goods and services. These types of standby letters of credit had a maximum exposure of $2.3 million
at March 31, 2010. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing
arrangements and have maturities of one year or less. The credit risk involved in issuing letters
of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
BankAtlantic may hold certificates of deposit and residential and commercial liens as collateral
for such commitments. Included in other
liabilities at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $8,000 and $5,000, respectively, of
unearned guarantee fees. There were no obligations associated with these guarantees recorded in
the financial statements.
38
Table of Contents
Concentration of Credit Risk
BankAtlantic
Bancorp holds residential loans located throughout the country. The majority of
these residential loans are jumbo residential loans. A jumbo loan has a principal amount above the
industry-standard definition of conventional conforming loan limits. These loans could potentially
have outstanding loan balances significantly higher than related collateral values in distressed
areas of the country as a result of the decline in real estate values in residential housing
markets. Also included in this purchased residential loan portfolio are interest-only loans. The
structure of these loans results in possible increases in a borrowers loan payments when the
contractually required repayments change due to interest rate movement and the required
amortization of the principal amount. These payment increases could affect a borrowers ability to
meet the debt service on or repay the loan and lead to increased defaults and losses. At March 31,
2010, BankAtlantic Bancorps residential loan portfolio included $704.6 million of interest-only loans,
which represents 50.4% of the residential loan portfolio, with 28.1% of the aggregate principal
amount of these interest-only loans secured by collateral located in California.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp has a high concentration of its consumer home equity and commercial loans in the
State of Florida. Real estate values and general economic conditions have significantly
deteriorated since the origination dates of the loans. If market conditions in Florida do not
improve or deteriorate further, BankAtlantic Bancorp may be exposed to significant credit losses in these
loan portfolios.
20. | Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions |
BFC is the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen. Woodbridge Holdings
Corporation (formerly Levitt Corporation) became a wholly owned subsidiary of BFC upon consummation
of the merger described throughout this report on September 21, 2009. Prior to the merger, BFC held
an approximately 59% voting interest in Woodbridge. BFC also has a direct non-controlling interest
in Benihana. Shares of BFCs Class A and Class B common stock representing a majority of BFCs
total voting power are owned or controlled by the Companys Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, Alan B. Levan, and by the Companys Vice Chairman, John E. Abdo, both of whom are also
directors of Bluegreen and Benihana, and executive officers and directors of BankAtlantic Bancorp
and BankAtlantic.
The following table presents related party transactions between the Company, BankAtlantic
Bancorp, and Bluegreen at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and for the three months ended,
March 31, 2010 and 2009. Woodbridges 2009 amounts are included in the amounts set forth for BFC.
Amounts related to BankAtlantic Bancorp were eliminated in the Companys consolidated financial
statements. Any amounts related to services provided to Bluegreen after we acquired a controlling
interest in Bluegreen (in November 2009) were eliminated in consolidation.
(in thousands) | BankAtlantic | |||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | BFC | Bancorp | Bluegreen | |||||||||||
Shared service income (expense)
|
(a) | $ | 594 | (492 | ) | (102 | ) | |||||||
Facilities cost
|
(a) | $ | (94 | ) | 81 | 13 | ||||||||
Interest income (expense) from cash balance/deposits
|
(b) | $ | 1 | (1 | ) | | ||||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||
Shared service income (expense)
|
(a) | $ | 585 | (448 | ) | (137 | ) | |||||||
Facilities cost
|
(a) | $ | (95 | ) | 78 | 17 | ||||||||
Interest income (expense) from cash balance/deposits
|
(b) | $ | 19 | (19 | ) | | ||||||||
At March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and (deposits)
|
(b) | $ | 4,751 | (4,751 | ) | | ||||||||
At December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and (deposits)
|
(b) | $ | 20,862 | (20,862 | ) | |
(a) | Pursuant to the terms of shared service agreements between the Company and BankAtlantic Bancorp, subsidiaries of the Company provide shared service operations in the areas of human resources, risk management, investor relations, executive office administration and other support services to BankAtlantic Bancorp. Additionally, the Company provides certain risk management and administrative services to Bluegreen. The costs of shared services are allocated based upon the usage of the respective services. Also, as part of the shared service arrangement, the Company pays BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen for office facilities costs relating to the Company and its shared service operations. |
39
Table of Contents
During 2009, BFC and BFC Shared Service Corporation (BFC Shared Service), a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC, amended the terms of the office lease agreements with BankAtlantic under which BFC and BFC Shared Service rent office space in BankAtlantics corporate headquarters. The amendment increased the aggregate monthly rent that BFC and BFC Shared Service pay BankAtlantic under these leases to $25,357, effective April 1, 2009. Prior to April 1, 2009, the aggregate monthly rent was $24,490. In May 2009, BFC also amended the terms of the office sublease agreement with Woodbridge (which was initially entered into in May 2008) pursuant to which Woodbridge subleases from BFC office space in BankAtlantics corporate headquarters. | ||
(b) | At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had deposits at BankAtlantic totaling $4.8 million and $20.9 million, respectively. These deposits were on the same general terms as deposits made by unaffiliated third parties. The aggregate interest income recognized in connection with funds held at BankAtlantic for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $1,000 and $19,000, respectively. Additionally, during 2009, we invested funds through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program at BankAtlantic, which facilitates the placement of funds into certificates of deposits issued by other financial institutions in increments of less than the standard FDIC insurance maximum to insure that both principal and interest are eligible for full FDIC insurance coverage. At December 31, 2009, the Company had $7.7 million invested through the CDARS program at BankAtlantic. The Company did not have any funds invested in the CDARS program at BankAtlantic as of March 31, 2010. |
In March 2008, BankAtlantic entered into an agreement to provide information technology
support to Woodbridge in exchange for monthly payments to BankAtlantic of $10,000 and a one-time
set-up charge of approximately $20,000. Monthly payments were increased to $15,000 effective July
1, 2009. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, BankAtlantic received
approximately $45,000 and $30,000 respectively, under this agreement.
The Company leases office space to Pizza Fusion for approximately $68,000 annually pursuant to
a month-to-month lease which commenced in September 2008. During the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009, Pizza Fusion paid approximately $24,000 and $18,000, respectively, under this lease
agreement.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we were reimbursed approximately
$535,000 and $307,000, respectively, from Bluegreen for various advisory services.
In prior periods, BankAtlantic Bancorp issued options to purchase shares of its Class A common
stock to employees of Woodbridge prior to the spin-off of Woodbridge to BankAtlantic Bancorps
shareholders. Additionally, certain employees of BankAtlantic Bancorp have transferred to
affiliate companies and BankAtlantic Bancorp has elected, in accordance with the terms of
BankAtlantic Bancorps stock option plans, not to cancel the stock options held by those former
employees. BankAtlantic Bancorp accounts for these options to former employees as employee stock
options because these individuals were employees of BankAtlantic Bancorp on the grant date.
Outstanding options to purchase BankAtlantic Bancorp stock held by former employees consisted
of the following as of March 31, 2010:
Class A | Weighted | |||||||
Common | Average | |||||||
Stock | Price | |||||||
Options outstanding |
45,476 | $ | 53.57 | |||||
Options non-vested |
6,181 | $ | 95.10 |
During the year ended December 31, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp issued to BFC employees that
performed services for BankAtlantic Bancorp options to acquire 9,800 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps
Class A common stock at an exercise price of $46.90. These options vest in five years and expire
ten years from the grant date. BankAtlantic recorded $12,000 of service provider expenses relating
to these options for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
40
Table of Contents
Certain of the Companys affiliates, including its executive officers, have independently made
investments with their own funds in both public and private entities that the Company sponsored in
2001 and in which it holds investments.
Florida Partners Corporation owns 133,314 shares of the Companys Class B Common Stock and
1,270,294 shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock. Alan B. Levan may be deemed to be the
controlling shareholder of Florida Partners Corporation, and is also a member of its Board of
Directors.
21. | Loss Per Common Share |
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common
share attributable to the Company (in thousands, except for per share data):
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Basic (loss) earnings per common share |
||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
$ | (35,251 | ) | (32,429 | ) | |||
Less: Noncontrolling interests loss from continuing operations |
(14,665 | ) | (20,958 | ) | ||||
Loss attributable to BFC |
(20,586 | ) | (11,471 | ) | ||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Loss allocable to common stock |
(20,774 | ) | (11,659 | ) | ||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
(249 | ) | 3,397 | |||||
Less: Noncontrolling interests income discontinued operations |
| 2,329 | ||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations attributable to BFC |
(249 | ) | 1,068 | |||||
Net loss allocable to common shareholders |
$ | (21,023 | ) | (10,591 | ) | |||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
75,376 | 45,114 | ||||||
Basic (loss) earnings per common share: |
||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.28 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||
Earnings per share from discontinued operations |
| 0.03 | ||||||
Basic loss per share |
$ | (0.28 | ) | (0.23 | ) | |||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (20,774 | ) | (11,659 | ) | |||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations allocable to common stock |
(249 | ) | 1,068 | |||||
Net loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (21,023 | ) | (10,591 | ) | |||
Denominator |
||||||||
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
75,376 | 45,114 | ||||||
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
75,376 | 45,114 | ||||||
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.28 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||
Earnings per share from discontinued operations |
| 0.03 | ||||||
Diluted loss per share |
$ | (0.28 | ) | (0.23 | ) | |||
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, 2,510,693 and 1,797,960, respectively,
of options to acquire shares of Class A Common Stock were anti-dilutive.
41
Table of Contents
22. | Parent Company Financial Information |
BFCs parent company accounting policies are generally the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies appearing in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. The Companys investments in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen
and the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries and venture partnerships are presented in the parent
company financial statements as if accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
BFCs parent company unaudited condensed statements of financial condition at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, and unaudited condensed statements of operations and unaudited condensed
statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are shown below:
BFC Financial Corporation
Parent Company Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
(In thousands)
Parent Company Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
(In thousands)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 18,399 | 1,308 | |||||
Securities available for sale |
33,142 | 18,981 | ||||||
Investment in Woodbridge Holdings, LLC |
155,895 | 197,264 | ||||||
Investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. |
39,160 | 47,555 | ||||||
Investment in and advances in other subsidiaries |
1,746 | 2,218 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,134 | 1,279 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 249,476 | 268,605 | |||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Advances from wholly owned subsidiaries |
$ | 825 | 818 | |||||
Other liabilities |
11,957 | 11,699 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
12,782 | 12,517 | ||||||
Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock |
11,029 | 11,029 | ||||||
Shareholders equity |
225,665 | 245,059 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 249,476 | 268,605 | |||||
Parent Company Condensed Statements of Operations
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenues |
$ | 263 | 283 | |||||
Expenses |
1,914 | 2,023 | ||||||
Loss before earnings (loss) from subsidiaries |
(1,651 | ) | (1,740 | ) | ||||
Equity in (loss) earnings in Woodbridge Holdings, LLC |
(10,666 | ) | 3,735 | |||||
Equity in loss in BankAtlantic Bancorp |
(7,796 | ) | (13,359 | ) | ||||
Equity in loss in other subsidiaries |
(473 | ) | (107 | ) | ||||
Loss before income taxes |
(20,586 | ) | (11,471 | ) | ||||
Income taxes |
| | ||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(20,586 | ) | (11,471 | ) | ||||
Equity in subsidiaries discontinued operations |
(249 | ) | 1,068 | |||||
Net loss |
(20,835 | ) | (10,403 | ) | ||||
5% Preferred Stock dividends |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Net loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (21,023 | ) | (10,591 | ) | |||
42
Table of Contents
Parent Company Statements of Cash Flow
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
$ | (1,155 | ) | (1,560 | ) | |||
Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of securities available for sale |
(12,851 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale |
1,200 | | ||||||
Distribution from subsidiaries |
30,085 | 84 | ||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
18,434 | 84 | ||||||
Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Preferred stock dividends paid |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
17,091 | (1,664 | ) | |||||
Cash at beginning of period |
1,308 | 9,218 | ||||||
Cash at end of period |
$ | 18,399 | 7,554 | |||||
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities |
||||||||
Net increase in shareholders equity from the effect of subsidiaries
capital transactions, net of income taxes |
$ | 814 | 391 | |||||
Increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes |
1,692 | 1,556 | ||||||
Net decrease in BFCs shareholders equity resulting from cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
(1,212 | ) | |
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, BFC did not receive cash dividends from
BankAtlantic Bancorp. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, BFC received cash dividends of
$84,000 from BankAtlantic Bancorp.
23. | Litigation |
BFC and its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries
Appraisal Rights
Under Florida law, holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock who did not vote to approve
the Woodbridge merger and who properly asserted and exercised their appraisal rights with respect
to their shares (Dissenting Holders) are entitled to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to
the fair value of their shares (as determined in accordance with the provisions of Florida law) in
lieu of the shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock which they would otherwise have been entitled to
receive. Dissenting Holders, who owned in the aggregate approximately 4.6 million shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, provided written notice to Woodbridge regarding their intent to
exercise their appraisal rights. In accordance with Florida law, Woodbridge provided written
notices and required forms to the Dissenting Holders setting forth, among other things, its
determination that the fair value of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock immediately prior to the
effectiveness of the merger was $1.10 per share. Dissenting Holders were required to return their
appraisal forms by November 10, 2009 and indicate on their appraisal forms whether the Dissenting
Holder chose to (i) accept Woodbridges offer of $1.10 per share or (ii) demand payment of the fair
value estimate determined by the Dissenting Holder plus interest. One Dissenting Holder which held
approximately 400,000 shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock had withdrawn its shares from the
appraisal rights process, while the remaining Dissenting Holders, who collectively held
approximately 4.2 million shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, have rejected Woodbridges
offer of $1.10 per share and requested payment for their shares based on their respective fair
value estimates of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. In December 2009, the Company recorded a $4.6
million liability with a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in capital representing, in the
aggregate, Woodbridges offer to the Dissenting Holders. However, the appraisal rights litigation
is currently ongoing and its outcome is uncertain. As a result, there is no assurance as to the
amount of cash that we will be required to pay to the Dissenting Holders, which amount may be
greater than the $4.6 million that we have accrued.
43
Table of Contents
National Bank of South Carolina v. Core Communities of South Carolina, LLC, et al., South Carolina
Court of Common Pleas, Fourteenth Judicial Circuit
On January 13, 2010, National Bank of South Carolina filed a complaint in the South Carolina
Court of Common Pleas, Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, to commence foreclosure proceedings related to
property at Tradition Hilton Head which served as collateral under a note and mortgage executed and
delivered by Core Communities of South Carolina in favor of the lender. With Cores concurrence,
the property was subsequently placed under the control of a receiver appointed by the court. Core
is secondarily liable to the lender as a guarantor but is not currently a party to the action.
Investors Warranty of America, Inc. v. Core Communities of South Carolina, LLC and Core
Communities, LLC, et. al., Circuit Court, Jasper County, South Carolina
On April 7, 2010, Investors Warranty of America filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of
Jasper County, South Carolina to commence foreclosure proceedings related to property at Tradition
Hilton Head which served as collateral for a loan made by the lender to Core and its subsidiary.
The outstanding balance of the loan at March 31, 2010 was approximately $27.2 million.
Investors Warranty of America, Inc. v. Core Communities, LLC and Horizons Acquisition 5, LLC,
Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for St. Lucie County, Florida
On April 8, 2010, Investors Warranty of America filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of
the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for St. Lucie County, Florida to commence foreclosure
proceedings related to property at Tradition, Florida which served as collateral for a loan made by
the lender to Core and its subsidiary. The outstanding balance of the loan at March 31, 2010 was
approximately $86.5 million.
AmTrust Bank v. Woodbridge Holdings, LLC and Carolina Oak Homes, LLC, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
On November 24, 2009, AmTrust Bank filed a complaint with the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Florida asserting claims based on alleged breaches of a promissory note
and guaranty related to an approximately $37.2 million loan that is collateralized by the Carolina
Oak property. AmTrust Bank was subsequently taken over by the FDIC and, on March 3, 2010, the FDIC
filed a motion to substitute the FDIC as the real party in interest and filed a notice of removal. While
there may have been an issue with respect to compliance with certain covenants in the loan
documents, we do not believe that an event of default had occurred as was alleged. We are
currently negotiating with representatives of the FDIC in an effort to bring about a satisfactory
conclusion with regard to the debt; however, the outcome of this matter is uncertain.
Levitt and Sons Bankruptcy
As previously reported, on February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court presiding over Levitt and
Sons Chapter 11 bankruptcy case entered an order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed
by Levitt and Sons and the Joint Committee. That order also approved the settlement pursuant to
the Settlement Agreement, as amended. No appeal or rehearing of the courts order was filed by any
party, and the settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009.
Class Action Litigation
On January 25, 2008, plaintiff Robert D. Dance filed a purported class action complaint as a
putative purchaser of securities against Woodbridge and certain of its officers and directors,
asserting claims under the federal securities law and seeking damages. This action was filed in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and is captioned Dance v.
Levitt Corp. et al., No. 08-CV-60111-DLG. The securities litigation purports to be brought on
behalf of all purchasers of Woodbridges securities beginning on January 31, 2007 and ending on
August 14, 2007. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of
the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by issuing a series of false and/or
misleading statements regarding financial results, prospects and condition.
44
Table of Contents
Surety Bond Claim
This litigation arises from a dispute regarding liability under two performance bonds issued
in connections with a plat issued by the City of Brooksville for a single family housing project
that was not commenced and was
abandoned prior to the bankruptcy of Levitt and Sons. Although the property was deeded over to the
lender as part of the bankruptcy, Woodbridge was a guarantor on the bonds. The City of Brooksville
contends that, notwithstanding that the single family project was never commenced for which
utilities were to be provided, it has a right to collect the cash sum of the bonds in the amount of
approximately $5.4 million. Following Levitt and Sons failure, Key Bank acquired the property and
conveyed it to a buyer who negotiated a new agreement eliminating any requirement for completing
the planned utilities. Nonetheless, the City continued to assert rights against the bonds.
Woodbridge has fully secured the obligations of the surety under the bonds and will be liable if
the Citys position is found to be correct.
Bluegreen Corporation
Tennessee Tax Audit
In 2005, the State of Tennessee Audit Division (the Division) audited certain subsidiaries
within Bluegreen Resorts for the period from December 1, 2001 through December 31, 2004. On
September 23, 2006, the Division issued a notice of assessment for approximately $652,000 of
accommodations tax based on the use of Bluegreen Vacation Club accommodations by Bluegreen Vacation
Club members who became members through the purchase of non-Tennessee property. Bluegreen believes
the attempt to impose such a tax is contrary to Tennessee law and has vigorously opposed, and
intends to continue to vigorously oppose, such assessment by the Division. An informal conference
was held in December 2007 to discuss this matter with representatives of the Division. No formal
resolution of the issue was reached during the conference and no further action has to date been
initiated by the State of Tennessee. While the timeshare industry has been successful in
challenging the imposition of sales taxes on the use of accommodations by timeshare owners, there
is no assurance that Bluegreen will be successful in contesting the current assessment.
Pennsylvania Attorney General Lawsuit
On October 28, 2008, in Cause No. 479 M.D. 2008, styled Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Acting by Attorney General Thomas W. Corbett, Jr. v. Bluegreen Corporation, Bluegreen Resorts,
Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. and Great Vacation Destinations, Inc., in the Commonwealth
Court of Pennsylvania, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania acting through its Attorney General filed a
lawsuit against Bluegreen Corporation, Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. and
Great Vacation Destinations, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Bluegreen Corporation) alleging
violations of Pennsylvanias Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Laws. The lawsuit
alleged that Bluegreen used sales and marketing methods or practices that were unlawful under
Pennsylvania law and seeks a permanent injunction preventing Bluegreen from using such methods and
practices in the future. The lawsuit also sought civil penalties and restitution on behalf of
Pennsylvania consumers. The lawsuit did not seek to permanently restrain Bluegreen or any of its
affiliates from doing business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The parties have reached a
settlement on this matter and on March 15, 2010 Bluegreen signed a consent petition and forwarded
it to the Attorney Generals office for counter-signature and filing with the appropriate court
offices. As of March 31, 2010, $225,000 was accrued in connection with the resolution of this
matter.
Destin, Florida Deposit Dispute Lawsuit
In Cause No. 2006-Ca-3374, styled Joseph M. Scheyd, Jr., P.A. vs. Bluegreen Vacations
Unlimited, Inc.,; Hubert A. Laird; and MSB of Destin, Inc., in the Circuit Court of the First
Judicial Circuit in and for Okaloosa County, Florida, the Plaintiff as escrow agent brought an
interpleader action seeking a determination as to whether Bluegreen, as purchaser, or Hubert A.
Laird and MSB of Destin, Inc. as seller, were entitled to the $1.4 million escrow deposit being
maintained with the escrow agent pursuant to a purchase and sale contract for real property located
in Destin, Florida. Both Bluegreen and the seller have brought cross-claims for breach of the
underlying purchase and sale contract. The seller alleges Bluegreen failed to perform under the
terms of the purchase and sale contract and thus they are entitled to retain the escrow deposit.
Bluegreen maintains that its decision not to close on the purchase of the subject real property was
proper under the purchase and sale contract and therefore Bluegreen is entitled to a return of the
full escrow deposit. The seller has amended its complaint to include a fraud count. Bluegreen
intends to vigorously defend this claim.
45
Table of Contents
Mountain Lakes Mineral Rights
Bluegreen Southwest One, L.P., (Southwest), a subsidiary of Bluegreen Corporation, is the
developer of the Mountain Lakes subdivision in Texas. In Cause No. 28006, styled Betty Yvon
Lesley et a1 v. Bluff Dale Development Corporation, Bluegreen Southwest One. L.P. et al., in the 266th Judicial
District Court, Erath County, Texas, the plaintiffs filed a declaratory judgment action against
Southwest seeking to develop their reserved mineral interests in, on and under the Mountain Lakes
subdivision. The plaintiffs claims are based on property law, oil and gas law, contract and tort
theories. The property owners association and some of the individual landowners have filed cross
actions against Bluegreen, Southwest and individual directors of the property owners association
related to the mineral rights and certain amenities in the subdivision as described below. On
January 17, 2007, the court ruled that the restrictions placed on the development that prohibited
oil and gas production and development were invalid and not enforceable as a matter of law, that
such restrictions did not prohibit the development of the plaintiffs prior reserved mineral
interests and that Southwest breached its duty to lease the minerals to third parties for
development. The court further ruled that Southwest was the sole holder of the right to lease the
minerals to third parties. The order granting the plaintiffs motion was severed into a new cause
styled Cause No. 28769 Betty Yvon Lesley et a1 v. Bluff Dale Development Corporation, Bluegreen
Southwest One. L.P. et al. in the 266th Judicial District Court, Erath County, Texas.
Southwest appealed the trial courts ruling. On January 22, 2009, in Bluegreen Southwest One,
L.P. et al. v. Betty Yvon Lesley et al., in the 11th Court of Appeals, Eastland, Texas, the
Appellate Court reversed the trial courts decision and ruled in Southwests favor and determined
that all executive rights were owned by Southwest and then transferred to the individual property
owners in connection with the sales of land. All property owner claims were decided in favor of
Southwest. It was also decided that Southwest did not breach a fiduciary duty to the plaintiffs as
an executive rights holder. As a result of this decision, no damages or attorneys fees are owed
to the plaintiffs. On May 14, 2009, the plaintiffs filed an appeal with the Texas Supreme Court
asking the Court to reverse the Appellate Courts decision in favor of Bluegreen. No information is
available as to when the Texas Supreme Court will render a decision as to whether or not it will
take the appeal.
Separately, one of the amenity lakes in the Mountain Lakes development did not reach the
expected water level after construction was completed. Owners of homesites within the Mountain
Lakes subdivision and the property owners Association of Mountain Lakes have asserted cross claims
against Southwest and Bluegreen regarding such failure as part of the Lesley litigation described
above as well as in Cause No. 067-223662-07, Property Owners Association of Mountain Lakes
Ranch, Inc. v. Bluegreen Southwest One, L.P. et al., in the 67th Judicial District
Court of Tarrant County, Texas. This case has been settled and the entire $3.4 million settlement
was paid in March of 2010. Additional claims may be pursued in the future by certain individual
lot owners within the Mountain Lakes subdivision in connection with these matters, but it is not
possible at this time to estimate the likelihood of loss or amount of potential exposure with
respect to any such matters.
Catawba Falls Preserve Homeowners Association Demand Letter
By letter dated October 2, 2008, the Catawba Falls Preserve Homeowners Association demanded
payment for (i) construction of pedestrian pathways and certain equestrian stables allegedly
promised by us but never constructed, (ii) repairs to roads and culverts within the community, and
(iii) landscaping improvements to the communitys gated entrance. The parties have reached
tentative settlement of the matter but several details remain to be resolved before the matter will
be concluded. As such, the parties have executed a tolling agreement which is effective until June
30, 2010. As of March 31, 2010, Bluegreen has accrued approximately $330,000 covering cash
payments and conveyance of two (2) vacant parcels within the community to the homeowners
association. There is no assurance that this matter will be settled on the contemplated terms, or
at all, or that the amounts which Bluegreen may ultimately owe with respect to this matter will not
be in excess of the amounts which Bluegreen has accrued.
Marshall, et al. Lawsuit regarding Community Amenities
On September 14, 2009, in Cause No. 09-09-08763-CV, styled William Marshall and Patricia
Marshall, et al. v Bluegreen Southwest One, L.P., Bluegreen Southwest Land, Inc., Bluegreen
Corporation, Stephen Davis, and Bluegreen Communities of Texas, L.P., Plaintiffs brought suit
against Bluegreen alleging fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, and negligence
with regards to the Ridgelake Shores subdivision Bluegreen developed in Montgomery County, Texas.
More specifically, the Plaintiffs allege misrepresentation concerning the usability of the lakes
within the community for fishing and sporting and the general level of quality at which the
community would be developed and thereafter maintained. The lawsuit seeks material damages and the
estimated cost to remediate the lake is $600,000. Bluegreen intends to vigorously defend the
lawsuit.
46
Table of Contents
Schawrz, et al. Lawsuit regarding Community Amenities
On September 18, 2008, in Cause No. 2008-5U-CV-1358-WI, styled Paul A. Schwarz and Barbara
S. Schwarz v. Bluegreen Communities of Georgia, LLC and Bluegreen Corporation, Plaintiffs
brought suit against
Bluegreen alleging fraud and misrepresentation with regards to the construction of a marina at the
Sanctuary Cove subdivision located in Camden County, Georgia. Plaintiff subsequently withdrew the
fraud and misrepresentation counts and replaced them with a count alleging violation of
racketeering laws, including mail fraud and wire fraud. On January 25, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a
second complaint seeking approval to proceed with the lawsuit as a class action on behalf of more
than 100 persons who claim to be harmed by the alleged activities in a similar manner as
Plaintiffs. No decision has yet been made by the Court as to whether they will certify a class.
Bluegreen denies the allegations and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries are also parties to
proceedings or lawsuits as plaintiff or defendant involving its bank operations, lending, tax
certificates activities and real estate activities. Additionally, from time to time, Bluegreen
becomes involved in disputes with existing and former employees, vendors, taxing jurisdictions and
various other parties. Although the Company believes it has meritorious defenses in the pending
legal actions and that the outcomes of these pending legal matters should not materially impact us,
the ultimate outcomes of these matters are uncertain.
24. | New Accounting Pronouncements |
For the period ended March 31, 2010, new accounting guidance was implemented requiring the
following additional disclosure regarding fair value measurements. (1) transfers in and out of
Level 1 and 2 measurements and the reasons for the transfers, and (2) a presentation of gross
activity within the Level 3 roll forward. The guidance also includes clarifications to existing
disclosure requirements on the level of disaggregation and disclosures regarding inputs and
valuation techniques. The guidance applies to all disclosures about recurring and nonrecurring fair
value measurements. The effective date of the guidance is the first interim or annual reporting
period beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the gross presentation of the Level 3 roll
forward information, which is required for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2010 and for interim reporting periods within those years. The additional disclosures made in
accordance with this new guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys financial
statements.
47
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Results of Operations
Overview
The objective of the following discussion is to provide an understanding of the financial
condition and results of operations of BFC Financial Corporation (and its subsidiaries) for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. As of March 31, 2010, BFC had total assets of
approximately $6.4 billion, liabilities of approximately $6.0 billion and equity of approximately
$368.4 million, which includes noncontrolling interests equity of approximately $142.8 million.
BFC Financial Corporation (BFC or, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise
requires, we, us, our or the Company) is a diversified holding company whose principal
holdings include a controlling interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including BankAtlantic
(BankAtlantic Bancorp), a controlling interest in Bluegreen Corporation and its subsidiaries
(Bluegreen), a non-controlling interest in Benihana, Inc. (Benihana), and a controlling
interest in Core Communities, LLC (Core or Core Communities). As a result of our position as
the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, we are a unitary savings bank holding
company regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).
Historically, BFCs business strategy has been to invest in and acquire businesses in diverse
industries either directly or through controlled subsidiaries. However, based on current
circumstances, BFC believes that, in the short term, the Companys and its shareholders interests
are best served by BFC providing strategic support to its existing investments. In furtherance of
this strategy, the Company took several steps in 2009 which it believes will enhance the Companys
prospects. Key actions taken in 2009 included the merger of BFC with Woodbridge Holdings during
the third quarter of 2009; the purchase of an additional 7% interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp during
the third quarter of 2009 which increased our economic interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp to 37% and
increased our voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp to 66%; and the purchase of an additional 23%
interest in Bluegreen during the fourth quarter of 2009 which increased our ownership in Bluegreen
to 52%. The acquisition of this control position in Bluegreen resulted in a bargain purchase gain under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
of approximately $183.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2009. In addition, we took actions to
restructure Core in recognition of the continued depressed real estate market and its inability to
meet its obligations to its lenders. Over the longer term and as the economy improves, we may look
to increase our ownership in our affiliates or seek to make other opportunistic investments, with
no pre-determined parameters as to the industry or structure of the investment.
As previously indicated, on September 21, 2009, we consummated our merger with Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation pursuant to which Woodbridge Holdings Corporation merged with and into
Woodbridge Holdings, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary which continued as the surviving company of
the merger and the successor entity to Woodbridge Holdings Corporation. Pursuant to the terms of
the merger, which was approved by each companys shareholders at their respective meetings held on
September 21, 2009, each outstanding share of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock (other than those
held by Dissenting Holders) automatically converted into the right to receive 3.47 shares of our
Class A Common Stock. Shares otherwise issuable to us attributable to the shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock owned by us were canceled in connection with the
merger. As a result of the merger, Woodbridge Holdings Corporations separate corporate existence
ceased and its Class A Common Stock is no longer publicly traded.
On November 16, 2009, approximately 7.4 million shares of the common stock of Bluegreen were
purchased for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $23 million. We previously owned
approximately 9.5 million shares of Bluegreens common stock and, as a result, our ownership
interest in Bluegreen increased from 29% of Bluegreens outstanding common stock to approximately
52%. Accordingly, we now have a controlling interest in Bluegreen and, under GAAP Bluegreens results are consolidated in our financial statements.
Prior to November 16, 2009, the approximate 29% equity investment in Bluegreen was accounted for
using the equity method.
GAAP requires that BFC consolidate the financial results of the entities in which it has a
controlling interest. As a consequence, the assets and liabilities of all such entities are
presented on a consolidated basis in BFCs financial statements. However, except as otherwise
noted, the debts and obligations of the consolidated entities, including BankAtlantic Bancorp,
Bluegreen, Woodbridge and Core, are not direct obligations of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC.
Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC absent a dividend or distribution
from those entities which may be limited or restricted. The recognition by BFC of income from
controlled entities is determined based on the total percent of economic ownership in those
entities. At March 31,
2010, BFC owned approximately 36% of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A and Class B common stock,
representing approximately 65% of BankAtlantic Bancorps total voting power. At March 31, 2010, BFC
owned approximately 52% of Bluegreens common stock.
48
Table of Contents
On February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court presiding over the previously disclosed Levitt and
Sons bankruptcy filing, entered an order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed by
Levitt and Sons, LLC (Levitt and Sons) and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors. That
order also approved the settlement pursuant to the settlement agreement that was entered into with
the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors. No appeal or rehearing of the Bankruptcy Courts order
was filed by any party, and the settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time payment
was made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement. Under cost method
accounting, the cost of settlement and the related $52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was
determined as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant to the settlement
agreement) was recognized into income in the first quarter of 2009, resulting in a $40.4 million
gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, we agreed to
share a percentage of any tax refund attributable to periods prior to the bankruptcy with the
Debtors Estate. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we accrued approximately $10.7 million in connection
with the portion of the tax refund which may be payable to the Debtors Estate pursuant
to the settlement agreement. As a result, the gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary for
the year ended December 31, 2009 was $29.7 million.
In December 2009, Core Communities reinitiated efforts to sell two of its commercial leasing
projects (the Projects) and began soliciting bids from several potential buyers to purchase
assets associated with the Projects. The assets are available for immediate sale in their present
condition and Core determined that it is probable that it will sell the Projects in 2010. Due to
this decision, the assets associated with the Projects were reclassified as assets held for sale
and the liabilities related to these assets were reclassified as liabilities related to assets held
for sale in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Additionally, the results of
operations for the Projects were reclassified to income from discontinued operations. Depreciation
related to these assets held for sale ceased in December 2009. The Company has elected not to
separate these assets in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the periods presented.
Management reviewed the net asset value and estimated the fair market value of the assets based on
the bids received related to these assets and determined that an impairment charge was necessary to
write down the carrying value of the Projects to their fair value less the costs to sell and,
accordingly, recorded an impairment charge of approximately $13.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2010, management determined that these assets were appropriately
recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less the estimated costs to sell. For a discussion of
the status of the Projects, see Cores Liquidity and Capital Resources.
On January 1, 2010, BFC, Bluegreen and BankAtlantic Bancorp adopted an amendment to the
accounting guidance associated with the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIEs) and
the accounting guidance for transfers of financial assets. The adoption of these standards resulted
in Bluegreen consolidating its special purpose finance entities and BankAtlantic Bancorp
consolidating its joint venture that conducts a factoring business. For further information, see
Note 2 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
As a result of the Woodbridge merger on September 21, 2009 and the Bluegreen share acquisition
on November 16, 2009, the Company reorganized its reportable segments to better align its segments
with the current operations of its businesses. The Companys business activities currently consist
of (i) Real Estate and Other and (ii) Financial Services. The Company currently reports the results
of operations of its business activities through six reportable segments: BFC Activities, Real
Estate Operations, Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen Communities, BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp
Parent Company. As a result of this reorganization, our BFC Activities segment now includes
activities formerly reported in the Woodbridge Other Operations segment and our Real Estate
Operations segment is comprised of what was previously identified as the Land Division.
The Companys Real Estate and Other business activities are reported in four segments which
are i) BFC Activities ii) Real Estate Operations, iii) Bluegreen Communities and iv) Bluegreen
Resorts. BFCs consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of Bluegreen
since November 16, 2009 (when we acquired a controlling interest in Bluegreen). Accordingly,
Bluegreens results of operations since November 16, 2009 are reported through the Bluegreen
Resorts and Bluegreen Communities segments. Prior to November 16, 2009, when we owned approximately
9.5 million shares of Bluegreens common stock, representing approximately 29% of such stock, the
investment in Bluegreen was accounted for using the equity method of accounting, and our interest
in Bluegreens earnings and losses was included in our BFC Activities segment. The Companys
Financial Services business activities include BankAtlantic Bancorps results of operations and are
reported in two segments: BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company.
49
Table of Contents
Forward Looking Statements
Except for historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this document
contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. When used in this
document and in any documents incorporated by reference herein, the words anticipate, believe,
estimate, may, intend, expect and similar expressions identify certain of such
forward-looking statements. Actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially
from those contemplated, expressed, or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein.
These forward-looking statements are based largely on the expectations of the Company and are
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which
are, in many instances, beyond the Companys control. When considering those forward-looking
statements, the reader should keep in mind the risks, uncertainties and other cautionary statements
made in this report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
including those discussed in the Risk Factors section of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. The reader should not place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statement, which speaks only as of the date made. This document also contains
information regarding the past performance of our investments and the reader should note that prior
or current performance of investments and acquisitions is not a guarantee or indication of future
performance.
Some factors which may affect the accuracy of the forward-looking statements apply generally
to the financial services, real estate, resort development and vacation ownership, and restaurant
industries, while other factors apply directly to us. Risks and uncertainties associated with BFC,
including its wholly-owned Woodbridge Holdings, LLC subsidiary, include, but are not limited to:
| risks associated with the Companys current business strategy, including the risk that BFC will not be in a position to provide strategic support to its affiliated entities or that such support will not achieve the anticipated benefits and may negatively impact our cash flow; | ||
| BFCs shareholders interests may be diluted if additional shares of BFCs common stock are issued, and BFCs public company investments may be diluted if BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen or Benihana issue additional shares of its stock; | ||
| the risk that creditors of the Companys subsidiaries or other third parties may seek to recover distributions or dividends made by such subsidiaries or other amounts owed by such subsidiaries from their respective parent companies, including BFC; | ||
| the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting the Company and its subsidiaries, and their operations, markets, products and services; | ||
| adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market and other capital markets and the impact of such conditions on the activities of the Company and its subsidiaries; | ||
| the impact of the current economic downturn on the price and liquidity of BFCs common stock and on BFCs ability to obtain additional capital, including that if BFC needs or otherwise believes it is advisable to issue debt or equity securities to fund its operations, it may not be possible to issue any such securities on favorable terms, if at all; | ||
| the performance of entities in which the Company has made investments may not be profitable or their results as anticipated; | ||
| BFC is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries to fund its operations, and currently BankAtlantic Bancorp is prohibited from paying dividends and may not pay dividends in the future, whether as a result of such restriction continuing in the future or otherwise, and Bluegreen has historically not paid dividends on its common stock, and even if paid, BFC has historically experienced and may continue to experience negative cash flow; | ||
| the risks associated with the merger of Woodbridge and BFC, including the uncertainty regarding the amount of cash that will be required to be paid to dissenting Woodbridge shareholders; | ||
| the risks related to the indebtedness of Woodbridge and its subsidiaries, which are in default, including that negotiations relating to the resolution of the indebtedness and the release from the obligations under any or all of the debt may not be successful; | ||
| the risks relating to Cores liquidity, cash position and ability to continue operations, including the risk that Core will be forced to cease its remaining operations, be obligated to make additional payments under its outstanding development bonds, or incur additional impairment charges and losses beyond those already incurred; |
50
Table of Contents
| the risk that Cores restructuring activities could cause the lenders under the defaulted loans to foreclose on any property which serves as collateral for the defaulted loans, and Core could be forced to cease its remaining operations, which would likely result in additional impairment charges and losses beyond those already incurred; | ||
| risks associated with the securities we hold directly or indirectly, including the risk that we may record further impairment charges with respect to such securities in the event trading prices decline in the future; | ||
| risks associated with the accounting for the Bluegreen share acquisition, including the estimates and analyses used to determine the final evaluation of the inventory of Bluegreen as of the acquisition date and the effect, if any, on the amount of the $183.1 million bargain purchase gain recorded at December 31, 2009; | ||
| the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP involves making estimates, judgments and assumptions, and our financial condition and operating results may be materially impacted in the future if our estimates, judgments or assumptions prove to be incorrect; | ||
| the risks related to litigation and other legal proceedings against BFC and its subsidiaries, including the costs and expenses of such proceedings, as well as the risk associated with a finding of liability or damages; and | ||
| the Companys success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing. |
With respect to BFCs subsidiary, BankAtlantic Bancorp, and its subsidiary, BankAtlantic, the
risks and uncertainties include:
| the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting BankAtlantic Bancorp and its operations, markets, products and services, including the impact of the changing regulatory environment, a continued or deepening recession, decreases in real estate values, and increased unemployment on its business generally, BankAtlantics regulatory capital ratios, the ability of its borrowers to service their obligations and its customers to maintain account balances and the value of collateral securing its loans; | ||
| credit risks and loan losses, and the related sufficiency of the allowance for loan losses, including the impact on the credit quality of BankAtlantic Bancorp loans (including those held in the asset workout subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp) of a sustained downturn in the economy and in the real estate market and other changes in the real estate markets in BankAtlantic Bancorps trade area and where collateral is located; | ||
| the quality of BankAtlantics real estate based loans including its residential land acquisition and development loans (including Builder land bank loans, Land acquisition and development and construction loans) as well as Commercial land loans, other Commercial real estate loans; and Commercial business loans; and conditions specifically in those market sectors; | ||
| the risks of additional charge-offs, impairments and required increases in our allowance for loan losses; changes in interest rates and the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws including their impact on the banks net interest margin; | ||
| new consumer banking regulations and the effect on our service fee income; | ||
| adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market and other financial and credit markets and the impact of such conditions on our activities, the value of our assets and on the ability of our borrowers to service their debt obligations and maintain account balances; | ||
| BankAtlantics strategic initiatives not resulting in continued growth of core deposits or increasing average balances of new deposit accounts or producing anticipated results; | ||
| the success of BankAtlantic Bancorp expense reduction initiatives and the ability to achieve additional cost savings or to maintain the current lower expense structure; | ||
| the impact of periodic valuation testing of goodwill, deferred tax assets and other assets; | ||
| past performance, actual or estimated new account openings and growth may not be indicative of future results; | ||
| BankAtlantic Bancorps cash offers to purchase the outstanding Trust Preferred Securities (TRUPS) are subject to the risk that a sufficient number of consents are not received for the requisite holders, that Trustees do not act on the consents or accept the offers in which they are involved and that BankAtlantic Bancorp is not able to obtain financing upon acceptable terms, in amounts sufficient to complete the offers, if at all; and | ||
| BankAtlantic Bancorp success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing. | ||
With respect to Bluegreen Corporation, the risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: | |||
| the state of the economy, generally, interest rates and the availability of financing affect Bluegreens ability to market vacation ownership interests (VOIs) and residential homesites; | ||
| Bluegreen would incur substantial losses and its liquidity position could be adversely impacted if the customers it finances default on their obligations; | ||
| Bluegreens business plan historically has depended on its ability to sell or borrow against its notes receivable to support its liquidity and profitability; |
51
Table of Contents
| while Bluegreen has attempted to restructure its business to reduce its need for and reliance on financing for liquidity in the short term, there is no assurance that such restructuring will be successful or that its business and profitability will not otherwise continue to depend on its ability to obtain financing, which may not be available on favorable terms, or at all; | ||
| Bluegreens results of operations and financial condition could be adversely impacted if its estimates concerning its notes receivable are incorrect, and its new credit underwriting standards may not have the anticipated favorable impact on performance; | ||
| Bluegreens future success depends on its ability to market its products successfully and efficiently; | ||
| Bluegreen is subject to the risks of the real estate market and the risks associated with real estate development, including the declines in real estate values and the deterioration of real estate sales; | ||
| Bluegreens adoption on January 1, 2010, of the accounting guidance requiring the consolidation of its special purpose finance entities had a material adverse impact on its net worth, leverage, and book value per share, and could have an adverse impact on its profits in the future; | ||
| Bluegreen may not be successful in increasing or expanding its fee-based services relationships and its fee-based service activities may not become an increasing portion of its business or generate profits, which may have an adverse impact on its results of operations and financial condition; | ||
| claims for development-related defects could adversely affect Bluegreens financial condition and operating results; | ||
| the resale market for VOIs could adversely affect Bluegreens business; | ||
| Bluegreen may be adversely affected by extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations and changes in applicable laws and regulations, including with respect to the imposition of additional taxes on operations; | ||
| environmental liabilities, including claims with respect to mold or hazardous or toxic substances, could have a material adverse impact on Bluegreens business; | ||
| the ratings of third-party rating agencies could adversely impact Bluegreens ability to obtain, renew, or extend credit facilities, debt, or otherwise raise capital; | ||
| Bluegreen has significant debt maturing in the near term which could impact its liquidity position, and, if necessary, it may not be successful in refinancing the debt on favorable terms, if at all; and | ||
| the loss of the services of Bluegreens key management and personnel could adversely affect Bluegreens business. |
In addition to the risks and factors identified above, reference is also made to other risks
and factors detailed in reports filed by the Company, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen with the
SEC. The Company cautions that the foregoing factors are not exclusive.
52
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies
Management views critical accounting policies as accounting policies that are important to the
understanding of our financial statements and also involve estimates and judgments about
inherently uncertain matters. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated statements of
financial condition and assumptions that affect the recognition of income and expenses on the
consolidated statement of operations for the periods presented. Actual results could differ
significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to
significant change in subsequent periods relate to the determination of the allowance for loan
losses, evaluation of goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment, the valuation of real
estate acquired in connection with foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, the valuation of real
estate held for development and sale and its impairment reserves, revenue and cost recognition on
percent complete projects, estimated costs to complete construction, the valuation of investments
in unconsolidated subsidiaries, the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities in the
application of the acquisition method of accounting, accounting for deferred tax asset valuation
allowance, accounting for uncertain tax positions, accounting for contingencies, and assumptions
used in the valuation of stock based compensation. The accounting policies that we have
identified as critical accounting policies are: (i) allowance for loan losses and notes
receivables; (ii) impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets; (iii) valuation of securities as
well as the determination of other-than-temporary declines in value; (iv) accounting for business
combinations, including the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities in the
application of the acquisition method of accounting; (v) the valuation of real estate; (vi)
revenue and cost recognition on percentage of completion; (vii) estimated cost to complete
construction; (viii) the valuation of equity method investments; (ix) accounting for deferred tax
asset valuation allowance; and (x) accounting for contingencies. For a more detailed discussion
of these critical accounting policies see Critical Accounting Policies appearing in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 24 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item
1 of this report for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements applicable to the Company and
its subsidiaries.
Summary of Consolidated Results of Operations
The table below sets forth the Companys summarized results of operations (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Real Estate and Other |
$ | (14,730 | ) | 14,182 | ||||
Financial Services |
(20,521 | ) | (46,611 | ) | ||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(35,251 | ) | (32,429 | ) | ||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, less
income tax |
(249 | ) | 3,397 | |||||
Net loss |
(35,500 | ) | (29,032 | ) | ||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(14,665 | ) | (18,629 | ) | ||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
(20,835 | ) | (10,403 | ) | ||||
5% Preferred stock dividends |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Net loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (21,023 | ) | (10,591 | ) | |||
Consolidated net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $20.8 million compared
with a net loss of $10.4 million for the same period in 2009. The results from discontinued
operations relate to Ryan Beck and Core Communities commercial leasing projects, as discussed
further in Note 5 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
The 5% Preferred Stock dividend represents the dividends paid by the Company on its 5%
Cumulative Preferred Stock.
The results of our business segments and other information on each segment are discussed below
in BFC Activities, Real Estate Operations, Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen Communities, BankAtlantic
and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company.
53
Table of Contents
Consolidated Financial Condition
Consolidated Assets and Liabilities
Total assets at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $6.4 billion and $6.0 billion,
respectively. On January 1, 2010, BFC, Bluegreen and BankAtlantic Bancorp adopted an amendment to
the accounting guidance for transfers of financial assets and an amendment to the accounting
guidance associated with the consolidation of VIEs. As a result of the adoption of these accounting
standards, Bluegreen consolidated seven existing special purpose finance entities associated with
prior securitization transactions which previously qualified for off-balance sheet sales treatment,
and BankAtlantic Bancorp consolidated its joint venture that conducts a factoring business.
Accordingly, Bluegreens consolidated special purpose finance entities and BankAtlantic Bancorps
consolidated factoring joint venture are now consolidated in BFCs financial statements, and
resulted in a one-time non-cash after-tax reduction to retained earnings of $2.1 million
representing the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle associated with the
consolidation of Bluegreens seven existing special purpose entities. No charges were recorded in
connection with consolidation of BankAtlantic Bancorps factoring joint venture. The adoption of
this change in accounting principle also resulted in the following impacts to the Companys
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at January 1, 2010: (1) assets increased by $414.1
million, primarily representing the consolidation of notes receivable, net of allowance, partially
offset by the elimination of Bluegreens retained interests; (2) liabilities increased by $416.2
million, primarily representing the consolidation of non-recourse debt obligations associated with
third parties, partially offset by the elimination of certain deferred tax liabilities; and (3)
total equity decreased by approximately $2.0 million, including a decrease of approximately
$811,000 to noncontrolling interests (see Note 2 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements for further information). Other than such increases and decreases, the changes in
components of total assets from December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010 were primarily comprised of:
| an increase in cash and cash equivalents primarily reflecting a $215.3 million increase in BankAtlantic Bancorps cash balances at the Federal Reserve Bank associated with daily cash management activities. This contributed to a net increase in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $201.3 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, cash provided by operations was approximately $29.1 million, cash provided by investing activities was approximately $252.6 million and cash used in financing activities was approximately $80.4 million; | ||
| a decrease in securities available for sale reflecting BankAtlantic Bancorps sale of $43.8 million of mortgage-backed securities, as well as repayments; | ||
| a decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorps tax certificate balances primarily due to redemptions and decreased tax certificate acquisitions; | ||
| a decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorps loan receivable balances associated with $40.4 million of charge-offs, $45.8 million from the sale of loans and repayments of loans in the normal course of business combined with a significant decline in loan originations and purchases; and | ||
| an increase in real estate owned by BankAtlantic Bancorp associated with residential and commercial loan foreclosures. |
The Companys total liabilities at March 31, 2010 were $6.0 billion compared to $5.6 billion
at December 31, 2009. The primary changes in components of total liabilities from December 31,
2009 to March 31, 2010 were summarized below:
| an increase in BankAtlantics interest bearing deposit account balances associated with a $123.1 million increase in higher-yielding interest-bearing checking and savings accounts partially offset by $120.5 million of lower certificates of deposit balances; | ||
| an increase in BankAtlantics non-interest-bearing deposit balances primarily due to increased customer balances in checking accounts reflecting marketing efforts to customers who maintain higher account balances; | ||
| lower FHLB advances at BankAtlantic due to repayments using proceeds from the sales of securities and loan repayments and increases in deposit account balances; and | ||
| an increase in junior subordinated debentures due to interest deferments at BankAtlantic Bancorp. |
54
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
BFC Activities
BFC Activities consists primarily of (i) BFC operations, (ii) our investment in Benihana and
(iii) Woodbridge other operations.
BFC operations primarily consists of our corporate overhead and general and administrative
expenses, the financial results of a venture partnership that BFC controls and other equity
investments, as well as income and expenses associated with shared service operations in the areas
of human resources, risk management, investor relations, executive office administration and other
services that BFC provides to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen. BFC operations also includes
investments made by BFC/CCC, Inc. Woodbridge other operations consists of the operations of Pizza
Fusion Holdings, LLC (Pizza Fusion), a restaurant franchisor operating within the quick service
and organic food industries, and the activities of Cypress Creek Capital Holdings, LLC (Cypress
Creek Capital) and Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC (Snapper Creek). Prior to November 16,
2009, when we acquired additional shares of Bluegreens common stock giving us a controlling
interest in Bluegreen, Woodbridge other operations included an equity investment in Bluegreen.
The discussion that follows reflects the operations and related matters of BFC Activities (in
thousands).
For the Three Months Ended | Change | |||||||||||
March 31, | 2010 vs. | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||
Other revenues |
$ | 387 | 299 | 88 | ||||||||
387 | 299 | 88 | ||||||||||
Cost and Expenses |
||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
1,838 | 889 | 949 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
6,487 | 6,993 | (506 | ) | ||||||||
8,325 | 7,882 | 443 | ||||||||||
Gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridges
subsidiary |
| 26,985 | (26,985 | ) | ||||||||
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates |
(31 | ) | 6,265 | (6,296 | ) | |||||||
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates |
| (20,401 | ) | 20,401 | ||||||||
Impairment of investments |
| (2,396 | ) | 2,396 | ||||||||
Other income |
1,394 | 1,445 | (51 | ) | ||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations before
income taxes |
(6,575 | ) | 4,315 | (10,890 | ) | |||||||
Less: Benefit for income taxes |
(198 | ) | | (198 | ) | |||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (6,377 | ) | 4,315 | (10,692 | ) | ||||||
Other revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 related to franchise
revenues generated by Pizza Fusion totaling $387,000 and $299,000, respectively.
Interest expense consists of interest incurred less interest capitalized. Interest incurred
totaled $1.8 million for each of the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. No interest was
capitalized in the three months ended March 31, 2010, while interest capitalized in the three
months ended March 31, 2009 totaled $953,000. This resulted in net interest expense of $1.8 million
in the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $889,000 in the same 2009 period.
General and administrative expenses decreased $506,000 to $6.5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 from $7.0 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease was attributable
to management advisory service fees received, lower severance charges and lower bonuses offset in
part by higher accrued audit fees relating to the 2009 year-end audit, increased professional
services and a write-off of intangible assets related to Pizza Fusion.
Gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridges subsidiary reflected the reversal into income
of the loss in excess of investment in Levitt and Sons after Levitt and Sons bankruptcy was
finalized. The reversal resulted in a $40.4 million gain in the first quarter of 2009 of which $27
million was recorded in BFC Activities.
55
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
Prior to the consolidation of Bluegreen into our consolidated financial statements on November
16, 2009, we accounted for our investment in Bluegreen under the equity method of accounting. Our
interest in Bluegreens earnings during the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $6.3 million
(after the amortization of approximately $5.3 million related to the change in the basis as a
result of the impairment charges on this investment). During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we
recorded a $20.4 million impairment charge with respect to our equity method investment in
Bluegreen at that time.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we recorded a $2.4 impairment charge on our
investment in Office Depots common stock. The Company sold its remaining shares of Office Depots
common stock during the fourth quarter of 2009.
2008 and 2007 Step acquisitions Purchase Accounting
BFCs acquisitions in 2008 and 2007 of additional shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps and
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, respectively, were accounted for as step acquisitions under the
purchase method of accounting then in effect. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities acquired were
revalued to reflect market values at the respective dates of acquisition. The discounts and
premiums arising as a result of such revaluations are generally being accreted or amortized, net of
tax, over the remaining life of the assets and liabilities. The net impact of such accretion,
amortization and other effects of purchase accounting increased our consolidated net loss for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 by approximately $85,000 and decreased our consolidated net loss
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 by approximately $669,000.
BFC Activities- Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had cash, cash equivalents and short term
investments totaling approximately $39 and $45 million, respectively. The decline in cash and cash
equivalents at March 31, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009 primarily resulted from cash used to
fund BFCs operating and general and administrative expenses.
Except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of Woodbridge, Core, Bluegreen and
BankAtlantic Bancorp, are not direct obligations of BFC and generally are non-recourse to BFC.
Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC, absent a dividend or distribution
from those entities. BFCs principal source of liquidity is its available cash, short-term
investments, dividends or distributions from Woodbridge, and dividends from Benihana. As discussed
further in this report, tax law changes have resulted in the anticipated receipt of significant tax
refunds. We may use available funds to make additional investments in the companies within our
consolidated group, invest in equity securities and other investments or to otherwise fund
operations. Since March 2009, BFC has not received cash dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp and
does not expect to receive cash dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp for the foreseeable future
because BankAtlantic Bancorp is currently prohibited from paying dividends on its common stock.
Furthermore, certain of Bluegreens credit facilities contain certain terms which might limit the
payment of cash dividends.
We believe that our current financial condition and credit relationships, together with
anticipated cash flows from operations and other sources of funds, including the anticipated tax
refund which will provide net proceeds of approximately $23.9 million during 2010 along with
proceeds from the disposition of certain properties or investments, will provide for anticipated
near-term liquidity needs. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through the
foregoing, and may in the future issue, long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness, issue
equity and/or debt securities or sell assets, as determined to be appropriate by the Company; however, there is no assurance that any of these alternatives
will be available to BFC on attractive terms, or at all, particularly if the adverse current
economic and financial market conditions continue.
The development activities at Carolina Oak, which is within Tradition Hilton Head, were
suspended in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of, among other things, a further deterioration
in consumer confidence, an overall softening of demand for new homes, a decline in the overall
economy, increasing unemployment, a deterioration in the credit markets, and the direct and
indirect impact of the turmoil in the mortgage loan market. In 2009, the housing industry continued
to face significant challenges and Woodbridge made the decision to cease all activities at Carolina
Oak. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we reviewed the inventory of real estate at Carolina Oak for
impairment and as a result, recorded a $16.7 million impairment charge to adjust the carrying
amount of Carolina Oaks
inventory to its fair value of $10.8 million. Woodbridge is the obligor under a $37.2 million
loan that is collateralized by the Carolina Oak property. During 2009, the lender declared the
loan to be in default. Subsequently, the lender was taken over by the FDIC and accordingly, the
FDIC now holds the loan. While there may have been an issue with respect to compliance with
certain covenants in the loan agreements, we do not believe that an event of default had occurred
as was alleged. Woodbridge is negotiating with representatives of the FDIC in an effort to bring
about a satisfactory conclusion with regard to that debt. However, the outcome of the negotiations
is uncertain.
56
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
During 2008, Woodbridge entered into a settlement agreement, as amended (the Settlement
Agreement), with the Debtors and the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the Joint
Committee) appointed in the Chapter 11 cases related to the Levitt and Sons bankruptcy filing.
Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, among other things, (i) Woodbridge agreed to pay $8 million
to the Debtors bankruptcy estates, establish a $4.5 million release fund to be disbursed to third
party creditors in exchange for a third party release and injunction, pay an additional $300,000 to
a deposit holders fund and waive and release substantially all of the claims it had against the
Debtors, including its administrative expense claims through July 2008, and (ii) the Debtors
(joined by the Joint Committee) agreed to waive and release any claims they had against Woodbridge
and its affiliates. The Settlement Agreement also provided that if, within one year after the
Bankruptcy Courts confirmation of the Settlement Agreement, Section 172 of the Internal Revenue
Code was amended to permit a carry back of tax losses from calendar years 2007 or 2008 to one or
more years preceding calendar year 2005, then Woodbridge would share a portion of any resulting tax
refund with the Debtors and the Joint Committee based on an agreed upon formula. The Settlement
Agreement was subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of the Bankruptcy Court. On
February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly
proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Joint Committee. That order also approved the settlement
pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. No appeal or rehearing of the Bankruptcy Courts order was
timely filed by any party, and the settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time
payment was made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement. Under
cost method accounting, the cost of settlement and the related $52.9 million liability (less
$500,000 which was determined as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant to the
Settlement Agreement) was recognized into income in year ended December 31, 2009, resulting in a
$40.4 million gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary. In November 2009, the Workers,
Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 was enacted and extended the net operating loss
(NOL) carry-back period from two years to up to five years for the 2008 or the 2009 tax years and
as a result, we will be allowed to increase our NOL carryback period to as much as five years for
NOLs generated in 2008 or 2009 and obtain refunds of taxes paid in the newly included carryback
years of approximately $34.6 million. As described above, under the terms of the Settlement
Agreement, a portion of the refund, upon receipt, will be payable to the Levitt and Sons estate.
Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of 2009, we accrued approximately $10.7 million in connection
with the portion of the tax refund which may be payable pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. As a
result, the gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
$29.7 million.
On September 21, 2009, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program which
authorizes the repurchase of up to 20,000,000 shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock at an
aggregate cost of no more than $10 million. The share repurchase program replaced our $10 million
repurchase program that our Board of Directors approved in October 2006 which placed a limitation
on the number of shares which could be repurchased under the program at 1,750,000 shares of Class A
Common Stock. The current program, like the prior program, authorizes management, at its
discretion, to repurchase shares from time to time subject to market conditions and other factors.
No shares were repurchased during three months ended March 31, 2010 or the year ended December 31,
2009.
As discussed above, on September 21, 2009, BFC and Woodbridge consummated their previously
announced merger pursuant to which Woodbridge merged with BFC. In connection with the merger,
Dissenting Holders who collectively held approximately 4.2 million shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock exercised their appraisal rights and are entitled to receive an amount equal to the
fair value of their shares calculated in accordance with Florida law. Since these Dissenting
Holders have not withdrawn their demands, the Company during the fourth quarter of 2009 canceled
and retired the 14,524,557 shares of the Companys Class A Common which the Dissenting Holders
would have been entitled to receive in exchange for their shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a liability of approximately $4.6
million, which represented, in the aggregate, Woodbridges offer of $1.10 per share to the
Dissenting Holders with a corresponding reduction to the Companys additional paid-in capital. Each
Dissenting Holder rejected Woodbridges offer of $1.10 per share. The appraisal rights litigation
is ongoing and the results are uncertain, and there is no assurance that the actual payment that we
may be required to make will not exceed the amount accrued.
57
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
The Company owns 800,000 shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock, which it purchased
for $25.00 per share. The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into Benihanas common stock.
Based on the number of currently outstanding shares of Benihanas capital stock, the Convertible
Preferred Stock, if converted, would represent an approximate 19% voting interest and an
approximate 9% economic interest in Benihanas capital stock. The Company has the right to receive
cumulative quarterly dividends on its shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock at an annual
rate equal to 5% or $1.25 per share, payable on the last day of each calendar quarter. It is
anticipated that the Company will continue to receive approximately $250,000 per quarter in
dividends on Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock. The Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to
mandatory redemption of $20 million plus accumulated dividends on July 2, 2014 unless we elect to
extend the mandatory redemption date to a date no later than July 2, 2024.
On June 21, 2004, the Company sold 15,000 shares of its 5% Preferred Stock to an investor
group in a private offering. The Companys 5% Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 per
share. The shares of 5% Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option of the Company, from time to
time, at redemption prices ranging from $1,025 per share for the year 2010 to $1,000 per share for
the year 2015 and thereafter. The 5% Preferred Stock liquidation preference is equal to its stated
value of $1,000 per share plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends or an amount equal to the
applicable redemption price in a voluntary liquidation or winding up of the Company. Holders of the
5% Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except as provided by Florida law, and are entitled to
receive, when and as declared by the Companys Board of Directors, cumulative quarterly cash
dividends on each such share at a rate per annum of 5% of the stated value from the date of
issuance. Since June 2004, the Company has paid quarterly dividends on the 5% Preferred Stock of
$187,500. On December 17, 2008, the Company amended certain of the previously designated relative
rights, preferences and limitations of the Companys 5% Preferred Stock. The amendment eliminated
the right of the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock to convert their shares of Preferred Stock into
shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock. The amendment also requires the Company to redeem
shares of the 5% Preferred Stock with the net proceeds it receives in the event (i) the Company
sells any of its shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock, (ii) the Company sells any
shares of Benihanas Common Stock received upon conversion of Benihanas Convertible Preferred
Stock or (iii) Benihana redeems any shares of its Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Company.
Additionally, in the event the Company defaults on its obligation to make dividend payments on its
5% Preferred Stock, the amendment entitles the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock, in place of the
Company, to receive directly from Benihana certain payments on the shares of Benihanas Convertible
Preferred Stock owned by the Company or on the shares of Benihanas Common Stock received by the
Company upon conversion of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that
owns two commercial properties in Hillsborough County, Florida. At March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, the carrying amount of this investment was approximately $664,000 and $690,000, respectively,
which is included in investments in unconsolidated affiliates in the Companys consolidated
statements of financial condition. In connection with the purchase of the commercial properties in
November 2006, BFC and the unaffiliated member each guaranteed the payment of up to a maximum of
$5.0 million each for certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are not
related to the financial performance of the assets. BFC and the unaffiliated member also entered
into a cross indemnification agreement which limits BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts
of BFC and its affiliates.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 50% limited partner interest in a limited
partnership that has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owns an office building in
Tampa, Florida. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying amount of this investment
was approximately $314,000 and $319,000, respectively, which is included in investments in
unconsolidated affiliates in the Companys consolidated statements of financial condition. In
connection with the purchase of the office building by the limited liability company in June 2007,
BFC guaranteed the payment of certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are
not related to the financial performance of the asset up to a maximum of $15.0 million, or $25.0
million in the event of any petition or involuntary proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or
similar state insolvency laws or in the event of any transfers of interests not in accordance with
the loan documents. BFC and the unaffiliated members also entered into a cross indemnification
agreement which limits BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates.
No amounts are recorded in the Companys financial statements for the obligations associated
with the above guarantees based on the potential indemnification by unaffiliated members and the
limit of the specific obligations to non-financial matters.
58
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Real Estate Operations Segment
The Real Estate Operations segment includes the subsidiaries through which Woodbridge
historically conducted its real estate business activities. These activities are concentrated in
Florida and South Carolina and have included the development and sale of land, the construction and
sale of single family homes and townhomes and the leasing of commercial properties and office
space, and include the operations of Core, Carolina Oak, which engaged in homebuilding activities
in South Carolina prior to the suspension of those activities in the fourth quarter of 2008, and
Cypress Creek Holdings, which engages in leasing activities.
Woodbridges operations historically were concentrated in the real estate industry which is
cyclical in nature. During 2009 and the three months ended March 31, 2010, the real estate markets
continued to experience a significant downturn. Demand for residential and commercial inventory in
Florida and South Carolina remained weak and land sales continued to decline. The decrease in land
sales and continued cash flow deficits contributed to, among other things, the deterioration of
Cores liquidity. As a result, Core severely limited its development expenditures in Tradition,
Florida and completely discontinued development activity in Tradition Hilton Head. The value of
Cores assets were significantly impaired, resulting in impairment charges relating to those assets
of $78.0 million during 2009, which included $13.6 million of impairment charges related to assets
held for sale. Core is currently in default under the terms of all of its indebtedness having an
aggregate outstanding principal amount of $210.4 million (including loans associated with assets
held for sale). See Cores Liquidity and Capital Resources below for more information regarding
the status of Cores outstanding indebtedness.
As a consequence of the reduced activity at Core and in light of current market conditions,
management made the decision to further reduce Cores headcount by 41 employees in 2009 and
recorded severance charges of approximately $1.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2009 bringing the
number of Cores employees to 9 associates as of March 31, 2010.
Real Estate Operations
Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||
Sales of real estate |
$ | | 1,427 | (1,427 | ) | |||||||
Other revenues |
637 | 602 | 35 | |||||||||
Total revenues |
637 | 2,029 | (1,392 | ) | ||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Cost of sales of real estate |
| 693 | (693 | ) | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
2,659 | 4,438 | (1,779 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
1,983 | 1,359 | 624 | |||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
4,642 | 6,490 | (1,848 | ) | ||||||||
Interest and other income |
53 | 284 | (231 | ) | ||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before
income taxes |
(3,952 | ) | (4,177 | ) | 225 | |||||||
Benefit for income taxes |
| | | |||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(3,952 | ) | (4,177 | ) | 225 | |||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
(249 | ) | (804 | ) | 555 | |||||||
Net loss |
$ | (4,201 | ) | (4,981 | ) | 780 | ||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to the Same 2009 Period
Revenues from sales of real estate for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were comprised of
land sales, recognition of deferred revenue and revenue related to incremental revenue received
from homebuilders based on the final resale price to the homebuilders customer (look back
revenue).During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we sold approximately 10 acres which
generated revenues of approximately $650,000, and recognized
deferred revenue on previously sold land of approximately $754,000. We also earned look back
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009 of approximately $23,000. No revenues from the
sales of real estate were generated in the three months ended March 31, 2010.
59
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Other revenues remained relatively consistent at $637,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2010 compared to $602,000 for the same period in 2009.
We did not incur cost of sales of real estate for the three months ended March 31, 2010 while
we incurred $693,000 in cost of sales of real estate for the same period in 2009.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $2.7 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 from $4.4 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease was a result of,
among other things, lower sales and marketing expenses as a result of limited advertising
activities in Core and Carolina Oak in the quarter ended March 31, 2010, lower developer expenses
related to property owner associations in Tradition, Florida, lower compensation and benefits
expense, and lower office related expenses reflecting a lower headcount as a result of reductions
in force at Core in 2009.
Interest incurred totaled $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31 2010 and $2.0
million for the same period in 2009. No interest was capitalized in the three months ended March
31, 2010 while interest capitalized totaled $682,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Net
interest expense increased in the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in
2009 primarily as a result of the Companys decision to cease capitalizing interest in light of the
significantly reduced development activities in Florida and the suspension of development
activities in South Carolina. The increase was partially offset by lower interest rates for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Historically, the
capitalized interest allocated to inventory is charged to cost of sales as land and homes are sold.
There was no capitalized interest expensed to cost of sales of real estate for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 as we had no sales of real estate during the quarter. Cost of sales of real
estate for the three months ended March 31, 2009 did not include any significant amount of
previously capitalized interest.
Interest and other income decreased to $53,000 during three months ended March 31, 2010 from
$284,000 during the same period in 2009. This decrease was mainly due to a decrease in forfeited
deposits and lower interest rates as well as a decrease in cash balances for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
Loss from discontinued operations, all of which related to Cores Projects, decreased to
$249,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $804,000 in the same period in 2009. The
decrease was mainly due to lower depreciation expense in the three months ended March 31, 2010
compared to the same period in 2009 as we ceased recording depreciation expense related to the
Projects in December 2009 when they were classified as discontinued operations.
Cores Liquidity and Capital Resources
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Core had cash and cash equivalents of $2.1 million
and $2.9 million, respectively. Cash decreased by $0.8 million during the three months ended March
31, 2010 primarily as a result of cash used to fund Cores general and administrative expenses and
severance payments related to its recent reduction in work force. At March 31, 2010, Core had no
immediate availability under its various lines of credit.
During 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, the recession continued and the demand for
residential and commercial inventory showed no significant signs of recovery, particularly in the
geographic regions where Cores properties are located. The decrease in land sales and continued
cash flow deficits contributed to, among other things, the deterioration of Cores liquidity. As a
result, Core severely limited its development expenditures in Tradition, Florida and has completely
discontinued development activity in Tradition Hilton Head. Its assets have been impaired
significantly and in an effort to bring about an orderly liquidation without a bankruptcy filing,
Core commenced negotiations with all of its lenders and is seeking to liquidate its assets in an orderly way. Core
is currently in default under the terms of all of its outstanding debt totaling approximately
$139.0 million (excluding loans associated with assets held for sale of $71.4 million). Core
continues to pursue all options with its lenders, including offering deeds in lieu and other
similar transactions wherein Core would relinquish title to substantially all of its assets. During
February, 2010, with Cores concurrence, a significant portion of the land in Tradition Hilton Head
had been placed under the control of a court appointed receiver. In connection with the
receivership ,Core entered into a separate
60
Table of Contents
Real Estate
agreement with the lender that, among other things, grants Core a right of first refusal to
purchase the $25.3 million loan in the event that the lender decides to sell the loan to a third
party. This loan is collateralized by inventory with a carrying value of $33.0 million, net of
impairment charges of approximately $29.6 million in 2009. Separately, on April 7, 2010, and April
8, 2010, another of Cores lenders filed a foreclosure action in South Carolina and Florida,
respectively, seeking foreclosure of mortgage loans totaling approximately $113.7 million, plus
additional interest and costs and expenses, including attorney fees. As of March 31, 2010, the
carrying value of Cores inventory collateralizing the defaulted
loans that are the subject of these foreclosure proceedings was $82.9 million, net of impairment charges during 2009 of approximately
$33.7 million. There was no impairment charge in the three months ended March 31, 2010. While
negotiations with its lenders continue, there is no assurance that Core will be successful in
reaching any agreement with its lenders with respect to resolution of these obligations.
In December 2009, Core reinitiated efforts to sell two of its commercial leasing projects (the
Projects) and began soliciting bids from several potential buyers to purchase assets associated
with the Projects. The assets are available for immediate sale in their present condition and Core
determined that it is probable that it will sell the Projects in 2010. Due to this decision, the
assets associated with the Projects that are for sale have been classified as discontinued
operations for all periods presented in accordance with the accounting guidance for the disposal of
long-lived assets. Core has accepted an offer to sell the Projects, which has been approved by the
lender, with substantially all of the proceeds going to satisfy Cores obligations to the lender.
However, there can be no assurance that the transaction will close or that the lender will release
Core from its obligations. As of the date of this report, Core is in the due diligence phase of the
sale. See Note 5 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information.
Core is also a party to a certain Development Agreement with the city of Hardeeville, SC,
under which Core is obligated to fund $1 million towards the building of a fire station. Funding
was scheduled in three installments: the first installment of $100,000 was due on October 21, 2009;
the second installment of $450,000 was due on January 1, 2010; and the final installment was due on
April 1, 2010. Additionally, Core was obligated to fund certain staffing costs of $200,000 under
the terms of this agreement. Core did not pay any of the required installments and has not funded
the $200,000 payment for staffing. On November 5, 2009, Core received a notice of default from the
city for non payment. Core is in discussions with one of its lenders to fund the required payments
out of an interest reserve account established under its loan agreement with the lender while it
seeks to resolve this issue. However, in the event that Core is unable to obtain additional funds
to make these payments, it may be unable to cure the default on its obligation to the city, which
could result in a loss of entitlements associated with the development project.
Based on an ongoing evaluation of its cost structure and in light of current market
conditions, Core reduced its head count by 41 employees during 2009, resulting in approximately
$1.3 million in severance charges which were recorded during the fourth quarter of 2009. In the
first quarter of 2010, severance related payments at Core totaled approximately $577,000.
The negative impact of the adverse real estate market conditions on Core, together with Cores
limited liquidity, have caused substantial doubt regarding Cores ability to continue as a going
concern if Woodbridge chooses not to provide Core with the cash needed to meet its obligations when
and as they arise. Woodbridge has not committed to fund any of Cores obligations or cash
requirements, and it is not currently anticipated that Woodbridge will provide any funds to Core.
Cores results are reported in the Real Estate Operations segment in Note 18 of the Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this report. Cores financial
information included in the consolidated financial statements has been prepared assuming that Core
will meet its obligations and continue as a going concern. As a result, the consolidated financial
statements and the financial information provided for Core do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
In connection with the development of certain of Cores projects, community development,
special assessment or improvement districts have been established and may utilize tax-exempt bond
financing to fund construction or acquisition of certain on-site and off-site infrastructure
improvements near or at these communities. If these improvement districts were not established,
Core would need to fund community infrastructure development out of operating cash flow or through
sources of financing or capital, or be forced to delay its development activity. The obligation to
pay principal and interest on the bonds issued by the districts is assigned to each parcel within
the district, and a priority assessment lien may be placed on benefited parcels to provide security
for the debt service.
61
Table of Contents
Real Estate
The bonds, including interest and redemption premiums, if any, and the associated priority
lien on the property are typically payable, secured and satisfied by revenues, fees, or assessments
levied on the property benefited. Core pays a portion of the revenues, fees, and assessments levied
by the districts on the properties it still owns that are benefited by the improvements. Core may
also be required to pay down a specified portion of the bonds at the time each unit or parcel is
sold. The costs of these obligations are capitalized to inventory during the development period and
recognized as cost of sales when the properties are sold.
Cores bond financing at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of district bonds
totaling $218.7 million at each of these dates with outstanding amounts of approximately $165.8
million and $170.8 million, respectively. Bond obligations at March 31, 2010 mature in 2035 and
2040. As of March 31, 2010, Core owned approximately 16% of the property subject to assessments
within the community development district and approximately 91% of the property subject to
assessments within the special assessment district. During each of the three months ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, Core recorded a liability of approximately $159,000 in assessments on property
owned by it in the districts. Core is responsible for any assessed amounts until the underlying
property is sold and will continue to be responsible for the annual assessments through the
maturity dates of the respective bonds issued if the property is never sold. Based on Cores
approximate 91% ownership of property within the special assessment district as of March 31, 2010,
it will be responsible for the payment of approximately $10 million in assessments by March 2011.
If Core sells land within the special assessment district and reduces its ownership percentage, the
potential payment of approximately $10 million would decrease in relation to the decrease in the
ownership percentage. In addition, Core has guaranteed payments for assessments under the district
bonds in Tradition, Florida which would require funding if future assessments to be allocated to
property owners are insufficient to repay the bonds. Management has evaluated this exposure based
upon the criteria in accounting guidance for contingencies, and has determined that there have been
no substantive changes to the projected density or land use in the development subject to the bond
which would make it probable that Core would have to fund future shortfalls in assessments.
In accordance with accounting guidance for real estate, the Company records a liability for
the estimated developer obligations that are fixed and determinable and user fees that are required
to be paid or transferred at the time the parcel or unit is sold to an end user. At each of March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the liability related to developer obligations associated with
Cores ownership of the property was $3.3 million, of which $3.1 million is included in the
liabilities related to assets held for sale in the accompanying consolidated statements of
financial condition as of March 31, 2010.
The following table summarizes our Real Estate and Other contractual obligations (excluding
Bluegreen) as of March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | 13 - 36 | 37 - 60 | More than | |||||||||||||||||
Category (1) | Total | 12 Months | Months | Months | 60 Months | |||||||||||||||
Debt obligations (2) |
$ | 273,009 | 176,436 | 499 | 10,857 | 85,217 | ||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations |
1,035 | 785 | 191 | 59 | | |||||||||||||||
Debt obligations
associated with assets
held for sale |
74,533 | 71,483 | 110 | 124 | 2,816 | |||||||||||||||
Severance related
termination obligations |
537 | 537 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total obligations |
$ | 349,114 | 249,241 | 800 | 11,040 | 88,033 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Debt obligations consist of notes, mortgage notes and bonds payable and junior subordinated debentures. Operating lease obligations consist of lease commitments. The timing of contractual payments for debt obligations assumes the exercise of all extensions available at our sole discretion. Debt obligations and debt obligations associated with assets held for sale include defaulted loans totaling approximately $247.6 million as of March 31, 2010 of which repayment of the outstanding debt was accelerated by the lender and is currently being shown as immediately due and payable in less than 12 months. See Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this report for more information regarding the defaulted loans. | |
(2) | These amounts represent scheduled principal payments. |
62
Table of Contents
Real Estate
In addition to the above contractual obligations, we have $2.4 million in unrecognized tax
benefits in accordance with accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes, which provides
guidance for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial
statements uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take on a tax return.
At each of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Core had outstanding surety bonds of
approximately $860,000, which were related primarily to its obligations to various governmental
entities to construct improvements in its various communities. It is estimated that approximately
$495,000 of work remains to complete these improvements and it is not currently anticipated that
any outstanding surety bonds will likely be drawn upon.
Levitt and Sons had approximately $33.3 million of surety bonds related to its ongoing
projects at the time of the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases. In the event that these obligations
are drawn and paid by the surety, Woodbridge could be responsible for up to $8.0 million plus costs
and expenses in accordance with the surety indemnity agreements executed by Woodbridge. At each of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Woodbridge had $527,000 in surety bond accruals related to
certain bonds where management believes it to be probable that Woodbridge will be required to
reimburse the surety under applicable indemnity agreements. Woodbridge reimbursed the surety
approximately $37,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2009, in accordance with the
indemnity agreement for bond claims paid during the period, while no reimbursements were made in
the three months ended March 31, 2010. It is unclear whether and to what extent the remaining
outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be
responsible for additional amounts beyond this accrual. There is no assurance that Woodbridge will
not be responsible for amounts in excess of the $527,000 accrual. Woodbridge will not receive any
repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery of any amounts it may be required to pay. In
September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require Woodbridge to post collateral against a portion
of the surety bonds exposure in connection with demands made by a municipality. Woodbridge believes
that the municipality does not have the right to demand payment under the bonds and Woodbridge
initiated a lawsuit against the municipality. Woodbridge does not believe a loss is probable and
accordingly has not accrued any amount related to this claim. However, based on claims made on the
bonds, the surety requested that Woodbridge post a $4.0 million escrow deposit as security while
the matter is litigated with the municipality, and Woodbridge has complied with that request.
63
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreen
Bluegreens results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are reported through
two reportable segments which are Bluegreen Resorts and Bluegreen Communities. In the three months
ended March 31, 2009, our earnings attributable to Bluegreen were reported as part of Woodbridge
other operations, which is currently included in the BFC Activities segment.
Bluegreens results for the first quarter of 2010 reflect its continued efforts to improve its
cash flows from operations by targeting higher cash down payments on sales of VOIs, by limiting the
number of VOI sales for which it provides financing and by improving its selling and marketing
efficiencies in its Resorts Division. Bluegreens results also reflect its efforts to increase its
cash fee-based service businesses. While its cash flows from operations and its Resorts Division
segment operating margin reflects the success of these efforts, the Communities Division continued
to be impacted by low consumer demand for homesites during the quarter.
Additionally, during the first quarter of 2010:
| The Bluegreens Resorts and Communities Divisions generated segment operating losses of approximately $8.6 million. | ||
| Bluegreens adoption of the amendment to the accounting guidance associated with the consolidation of VIEs on January 1, 2010, resulted in its consolidation of seven existing special purpose financing entities that are associated with past securitization transactions. In addition to the material changes to the Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition (see Note 2 of the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements), the consolidation of these special purpose finance entities impacted the Statement of Operations during the first quarter of 2010 by increasing Bluegreens interest income from VOI notes receivable and increasing interest expense on notes payable, compared to prior periods. | ||
| Bluegreen recorded a charge of approximately $10.7 million to increase the reserve for loan losses on its VOI notes receivables generated prior to December 15, 2008, most of which were accounted for off-balance sheet prior to January 1, 2010. |
As discussed further under Liquidity and Capital Resources, Bluegreen Resorts sales
operations are materially dependent on the availability of liquidity in the credit markets.
Historically, Bluegreen has provided financing to a significant portion of its Bluegreen Resorts
customers. Such financing typically involves the consumer making a minimum 10% cash down payment,
with the balance being financed over a ten-year period. As Bluegreen Resorts selling, general and
administrative expenses typically exceed the cash down payment, Bluegreen has historically
maintained credit facilities pursuant to which Bluegreen pledged or sold its consumer note
receivables. Furthermore, Bluegreen also engaged in private placement term securitization
transactions or similar arrangements to periodically pay down all or a portion of its note
receivable credit facilities.
There has been and continues to be an unprecedented disruption in the credit markets that has
made obtaining additional and replacement external sources of liquidity more difficult and, if
available, more expensive. The term securitization market continues to be limited and, as a
result, Bluegreen believes that financial institutions have been and continue to be more cautious
about entering into new credit facilities for the purpose of providing financing on consumer
receivables. Several lenders to the timeshare industry, including certain of Bluegreens lenders,
have announced that they will either be exiting the finance business or will not be entering into
new financing commitments for the foreseeable future. In addition, financing for real estate
acquisition and development and the capital markets for corporate debt have generally been
unavailable to Bluegreen.
While Bluegreen believes that the market for its Resorts product remains relatively strong,
Bluegreen is continuing to deemphasize its sales operations to conserve cash because of the
uncertainties in the credit markets. In an effort to conserve cash and availability under
Bluegreen receivables credit facilities, Bluegreen implemented strategic initiatives which have
included closing certain sales offices; eliminating what Bluegreen identified as lower-efficiency
marketing programs; emphasizing cash sales and higher cash down payments as well as pursuing other
cash-based services; reducing overhead, including eliminating a significant number of staff
positions across a variety of areas at various locations; limiting sales to borrowers who meet
newly applied underwriting standards; and increasing interest rates on new sales transactions for
which Bluegreen provides financing. Bluegreens goal was and continues to be to limit the number
of VOI sales while increasing the ultimate profitability of the sales it makes. Additional
information on Bluegreens strategic initiatives is provided in Liquidity and Capital Resources
below. Bluegreen believes that it has adequate timeshare inventory to satisfy its projected sales
for 2010 and, based on anticipated sales levels, for a number of years thereafter.
64
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreen continues to actively pursue additional credit facility capacity, capital markets
transactions, and alternative financing solutions, and hopes that the steps being taken will
position Bluegreen to maintain its existing credit relationships as well as attract new sources of
capital. Regardless of the state of the credit markets, Bluegreen believes that its resorts
management and finance operations will continue to represent recurring cash-generating sources of
income which do not require material liquidity support from the credit markets.
While the vacation ownership business has historically been capital intensive, Bluegreens
goal is to leverage its sales and marketing, mortgage servicing, resort management, title and
construction expertise to generate fee-based-service relationships with third parties that produce
positive cash flows and require less capital investment. As of March 31, 2010, Bluegreen was
providing resort management services to four resorts and it began providing management services at
a fifth resort during April 2010. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, Bluegreen sold
$15.8 million of third party inventory and earned sales and marketing commissions of approximately
$10.2 million, as well as title fees on such transactions. No such sales occurred for the same
period in 2009, as Bluegreen did not begin selling third party developer inventory until July 2009.
Bluegreen also provides resort design and development services and mortgage services under certain
of these arrangements. Bluegreen intends to pursue additional fee-based services relationships and
while there is no assurance that this will be the case, Bluegreen believes that these activities
will become an increasing portion of its business over time.
Bluegreen Communities business has been, and continues to be, adversely impacted by the
deterioration in the real estate markets. Demand for its homesites has decreased as well as sales
volume. Bluegreen has significantly reduced prices on certain of its completed homesites in an
attempt to increase sales activity and certain of its Communities inventories have been written
down to net realizable value. There can be no assurances that future changes in Bluegreens
intentions or pricing will not result in future material charges or adjustments to the carrying
amount of its inventory or otherwise adversely impact its results and financial condition in the
future.
Bluegreen has historically financed a majority of Bluegreen Resorts sales of VOIs, and
accordingly, are subject to the risk of defaults by customers. GAAP requires that Bluegreen
reduces sales of VOIs by its estimate of future uncollectible note balances on originated VOI
receivables, excluding any benefit for the value of future recoveries. The provision for loan
losses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $4.8 million and was mainly
associated with Bluegreen Resorts. The allowance for loan losses attributable to Bluegreen
Communities was not significant.
The deteriorating credit markets have negatively impacted Bluegreens financing activities.
While the credit markets appear to be recovering, the number of securitization and hypothecation
transactions being consummated in the market overall remains below historical levels and Bluegreen
believes that those that are consummated are more difficult to effect and are generally priced at a
higher cost than in prior periods. There can be no assurance that Bluegreen will be able to secure
financing for its VOI notes receivable on acceptable terms, if at all.
Since 2009 Bluegreen has renewed or extended certain of its existing credit facilities and
debt maturities (See the Liquidity and Capital Resources section for further information). In
connection with such renewals and extensions, Bluegreen may, in certain cases, agree to pay higher
interest rates and fees. In addition, conditions in the commercial credit markets are expected to
increase interest rates on new debt Bluegreen may obtain from time to time in the future. Any such
increased interest rates would increase Bluegreens expenses and adversely impact its results of
operations.
65
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreen Segments Financial Results
The following tables include Bluegreens financial results for the three months ended March
31, 2010. No comparative analysis was performed as Bluegreens results prior to November 16, 2009
are not included in the financial results below, but rather our earnings attributable to Bluegreen
were reported in our BFC Activities segment.
Bluegreen Resorts | Bluegreen Communities | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage | Percentage | Percentage | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | of Sales | Amount | of Sales | Amount | of Sales | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
System-wide sales (1) |
$ | 45,697 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in sales deferred
under timeshare accounting
rules |
(2,497 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated uncollectible VOI
notes receivable on current
period system-wide sales |
(4,310 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
System-wide sales, net |
41,387 | 100 | % | 3,666 | 100 | % | 45,053 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||
Sales of third-party VOIs |
(15,754 | ) | (38 | ) | | | (15,754 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Adjustment to allowance for
loan losses |
(10,704 | ) | (26 | ) | | | (10,704 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Sales of real estate |
14,929 | 36 | 3,666 | 100 | 18,595 | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of real estate sales |
(3,108 | ) | (21) | * | (5,788 | ) | (158 | ) | (8,896 | ) | (48) | * | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
11,821 | 79 | * | (2,122 | ) | (58 | ) | 9,699 | 52 | * | ||||||||||||||
Fee-based sales commission
revenue |
10,180 | 25 | | | 10,180 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other resort and communities
operations revenues |
15,670 | 38 | 351 | 10 | 16,021 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of other resort and |
(12,690 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
communities operations |
(11,943 | ) | (29 | ) | (747 | ) | (20 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Segment selling, general and
administrative expenses (2) |
(29,814 | ) | (72 | ) | (2,652 | ) | (72 | ) | (32,466 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||||||||||
Segment operating loss |
$ | (4,086 | ) | (10 | ) | $ | (5,170 | ) | (141 | ) | $ | (9,256 | ) | (21 | ) | |||||||||
* | Bluegreen Resorts cost of sales and Gross profit are calculated as a percentage of sales of real estate | |
(1) | Includes sales of VOIs made on behalf of third parties, which are effected through the same process as the sale of Bluegreens vacation ownership inventory, and involve similar selling and marketing costs. | |
(2) | General and administrative expenses attributable to corporate overhead have been excluded from the tables. Corporate general and administrative expenses (excluding mortgage operations) totaled $13.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. (See Corporate General and Administrative Expenses below for further discussion). |
66
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreen Resorts
Bluegreen Resorts Resort Sales and Marketing
The following table sets forth certain information for sales of both Bluegreen VOIs and VOI
sales made on behalf of third-party developers for a fee for the periods indicated. The
information is provided before giving effect to the percentage-of-completion method of accounting
and the deferral of sales in accordance with timeshare accounting rules:
For the Three Months | ||||
Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||
Number of Bluegreen VOI sales transactions |
3,478 | |||
Number of sales made on behalf of third-party
developers for a fee |
1,317 | |||
Total VOI sales transactions |
4,795 | |||
Average sales price per transaction |
$ | 11,618 | ||
Number of total prospects tours |
29,553 | |||
Sale-to-tour conversion ratio total prospects |
16.2 | % | ||
Number of new prospects tours |
15,408 | |||
Sale-to-tour conversion ratio new prospects |
12.1 | % |
Resort Management and Other Services
The following table sets forth pre-tax profit generated by Bluegreens resort management and other
services (in thousands):
For the Three Months | ||||
Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||
Resort Management Operations |
$ | 6,719 | ||
Title Operations |
1,471 | |||
Net Carrying Cost of Developer Inventory |
(3,551 | ) | ||
Other |
(138 | ) | ||
Total |
$ | 4,501 | ||
Bluegreen Communities
The table below sets forth the number of homesites sold by Bluegreen Communities and the
average sales price per homesite for the period indicated, before giving effect to the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting, and excluding sales of bulk parcels:
For the Three Months | ||||
Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||
Number of homesites sold |
66 | |||
Average sales price per homesite |
$ | 58,191 |
67
Table of Contents
Real Estate
The tables below set forth information with respect to contracts to sell homesites at March
31, 2010 (in thousands):
Contracts to Sell Property at | ||||
Projects Not Substantially Sold | ||||
Out at March 31, 2010 | ||||
Project |
||||
Vintage Oaks at the Vineyard |
$ | 1,923 | ||
Havenwood at Hunters Crossing |
381 | |||
Lake Ridge at Joe Pool Lake |
203 | |||
King Oaks |
313 | |||
Chapel Ridge |
150 | |||
Sanctuary Cove |
127 | |||
Total |
$ | 3,097 | ||
Contracts to Sell Property at | ||||
Projects Substantially Sold | ||||
Out at March 31, 2010 | ||||
Project |
||||
Saddle Creek Forest |
$ | 345 | ||
Miscellaneous |
255 | |||
Total |
600 | |||
Total Contracts |
$ | 3,697 | ||
Finance Operations
As of March 31, 2010, Bluegreens finance operations included the ongoing excess interest
spread earned on over $779.6 million of notes receivable. This amount reflects the consolidation on
January 1, 2010 of notes receivable held by seven of Bluegreens special purpose finance entities
that were previously not consolidated by Bluegreen in accordance with then-prevailing generally
accepted accounting principles (see Note 2 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information).
68
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Income from Notes Receivable Portfolio and Mortgage Servicing Operations
The following table details the sources of Bluegreens income and related expenses associated
with its notes receivable portfolio (in thousands):
For the Three Months | ||||
Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||
Income | ||||
Interest income: |
||||
VOI notes receivable |
$ | 29,966 | ||
Other |
45 | |||
Total interest income |
30,011 | |||
Servicing fee income: |
||||
Fee-based services |
13 | |||
Total income |
30,024 | |||
Expenses | ||||
Receivable-backed note interest expense |
11,736 | |||
Cost of mortgage servicing operations |
730 | |||
Total expenses |
12,466 | |||
Pre-tax income on notes receivable
portfolio and mortgage servicing operations |
$ | 17,558 | ||
Mortgage Servicing Operations.
Bluegreens mortgage servicing operations include recording and processing payments, and
collection of its owned notes receivable, as well as collecting payments on notes receivable owned
by third parties. In addition, Bluegreens mortgage servicing operations facilitate the
monetization of its VOI notes receivable through its various credit facilities, as well as perform
monthly reporting activities for its lenders and receivable investors. Prior to the adoption of
the amendment to the accounting guidance for the consolidation of VIEs on January 1, 2010,
Bluegreen recognized servicing fee income for providing mortgage servicing for notes receivable
that had been sold to off-balance sheet special purpose finance entities and for providing loan
services to other third-party portfolio owners, on a cash-fee basis. Effective January 1, 2010,
Bluegreen ceased recognizing servicing fee income for providing mortgage serving to its special
purpose finance entities as such entities are now consolidated (see Note 2 of the Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information).
During the first quarter of 2010 servicing fee income represented mortgage servicing fees
earned on behalf of a third-party lender in connection with one of Bluegreens fee-based services
arrangements. As of March 31, 2010, the total amount of notes receivable serviced by Bluegreen
under this arrangement was $6.7 million.
Interest Expense on Receivable-Backed Notes Payable
Interest expense on receivable-backed notes payable was $11.7 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010. This amount reflects a higher average debt balance as a result of the
recognition of approximately $411.4 million of non-recourse receivable-backed debt as a result of
the consolidation of Bluegreens special purpose finance entities as of January 1, 2010. As stated
above, accounting rules previously in effect required that the assets and liabilities of these
special purpose finance entities be treated off balance sheet and, accordingly, Bluegreen
historically did not recognize an obligation for the receivable-backed debt of the special purpose
finance entities nor did Bluegreen recognize the related interest expense on such debt.
Other Interest Expense
Other interest expense was $4.4 million for the first quarter of 2010.
Total interest expense capitalized to construction in progress was $71,000 for the first
quarter of 2010.
69
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Interest expense capitalized to construction in progress varies based upon the amount of
construction and development spending.
Bluegreens effective cost of borrowing, including interest expense on its receivable-backed
notes payable was 6.35% for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Corporate General and Administrative Expenses
Bluegreens corporate general and administrative expenses consist primarily of expenses
associated with administering the various support functions at its corporate headquarters,
including accounting, human resources, information technology, treasury, and legal. Corporate
general and administrative expenses, excluding mortgage servicing operations, were $13.0 million
for the first quarter of 2010.
Other Income
Other income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $316,000
Non-controlling Interests in Income of Consolidated Subsidiary
We include the results of operations and financial position of Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations,
LLC, Bluegreens 51%-owned subsidiary, in our consolidated financial statements (See Note 4 of the
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for further information). Non-controlling
interests in income of consolidated subsidiary was approximately $1.5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010.
Bluegreens Liquidity and Capital Resources
Bluegreens primary sources of funds from internal operations are: (i) cash sales, (ii) down
payments on homesite and VOI sales that are financed, (iii) proceeds from the sale of, or
borrowings collateralized by, notes receivable, (iv) cash from its finance operations, including
principal and interest payments received on the purchase money mortgage loans arising from sales of
VOIs and homesites and mortgage servicing fees, and (v) net cash generated from its sales and
marketing fee-based services and other resort services, including its resorts management
operations, and other communities operations.
Historically, Bluegreens business model has depended on the availability of credit in the
commercial markets. Resorts sales are generally dependent upon Bluegreen providing financing to
its buyers. Bluegreens ability to sell and/or borrow against its notes receivable from VOI buyers
is a critical factor in its continued liquidity. When Bluegreen sells VOIs, a financed buyer is
only required to pay a minimum of 10% to 20% of the purchase price in cash at the time of sale;
however, selling, marketing, and administrative expenses attributable to the sale are primarily
cash expenses and exceed the buyers minimum required down-payment. Accordingly, having financing
facilities available for the hypothecation, sale, or transfer of these vacation ownership
receivables is a critical factor in Bluegreens ability to meet its short and long-term cash needs.
Historically, Bluegreen has relied on its ability to sell receivables in the term securitization
market in order to generate liquidity and create capacity in its receivable facilities. In
addition, maintaining adequate VOI inventory to sell and pursue growth into new markets has
historically required Bluegreen to incur debt for the acquisition, construction and development of
new resorts. Bluegreen Communities has also historically incurred debt for the acquisition and
development of its residential land communities.
Since 2008, there have been unprecedented disruptions in the credit markets, which have made
obtaining additional and replacement external sources of liquidity more difficult and more costly
in the term securitization market. Market activity continues to be below historical levels and
transactions that have been consummated have generally been on more adverse terms. As a result,
financial institutions have been cautious about entering into new credit facilities for the purpose
of providing financing on consumer receivables. Several lenders to the timeshare industry,
including certain of Bluegreens lenders, have announced that they either have or will be exiting
the resort finance business or will not be entering into new financing commitments for the
foreseeable future. In addition, financing for real estate acquisition and development and the
capital markets for corporate debt have generally been unavailable on reasonable terms, if at all.
70
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreen has certain strategic initiatives in place with a view to better position its
operations in light of the
downturn in the commercial credit markets. Bluegreen intends to continue to monitor its results as
well as the external environment in order to attempt to adjust its business to existing conditions.
The ongoing goals of its strategic initiatives are designed to conserve cash and enhance its
financial position, to the extent possible by:
| Maintaining a significantly reduced sales level within its Resorts sales operations in an effort to match its sales pace to its liquidity and known receivable capacity; | ||
| Emphasizing cash-based business in its sales, resort management and finance operations, with particular focus on growing its fee-based service business; | ||
| Minimizing the cash requirements of Bluegreen Communities; | ||
| Maintaining reduced levels of overhead and continuing to see increasing efficiency; | ||
| Minimizing capital spending; | ||
| Working with its lenders to renew, extend, or refinance its credit facilities; | ||
| Maintaining compliance under its outstanding indebtedness; and | ||
| Continuing to provide what Bluegreen believes to be a high level of quality vacation experiences and customer service to its VOI owners. |
While Bluegreen believes that it has realized initial success with its strategic initiatives,
there is no assurance that Bluegreen will be successful in achieving its goals.
While the vacation ownership business has historically been capital intensive, one of
Bluegreens principal goals is to utilize its sales and marketing, mortgage servicing, resort
management, title and construction expertise to pursue low-capital requirement, fee-based-service
business relationships that produce strong cash flows for its business.
While Bluegreen has successfully extended or refinanced the majority of its debt originally
maturing or requiring partial repayment in 2009 and 2010, the advance periods of many of its
facilities have or will expire in the near term. Bluegreen intends to continue its efforts to
renew and extend the advance periods under certain of its existing receivable-backed credit
facilities, and to seek additional similar credit facilities, and Bluegreen believes that the
implementation of its strategic initiatives has positioned them to address these matters with its
existing and future lenders; however, there is no assurance that its efforts will be successful, in
which case, its liquidity would be significantly adversely impacted. Further, while Bluegreen may
seek to raise additional debt or equity financing in the future to fund operations or repay
outstanding debt, there is no assurance that such financing will be available to them on favorable
terms or at all. In light of the current trading price of Bluegreens common stock, financing
involving the issuance of its common stock or securities convertible into its common stock would be
highly dilutive to its existing shareholders.
Bluegreens levels of debt and debt service requirements have several important effects on its
operations, including the following: (i) its significant cash requirements to service debt reduce
the funds available for operations and future business opportunities and increase its vulnerability
to adverse economic and industry conditions, as well as conditions in the credit markets,
generally; (ii) its leverage position increases its vulnerability to economic and competitive
pressures; (iii) the financial covenants and other restrictions contained in indentures, credit
agreements and other agreements relating to its indebtedness requires Bluegreen to meet certain
financial tests and restricts its ability to, among other things, borrow additional funds, dispose
of assets, make investments or pay cash dividends on or repurchase common stock (although Bluegreen
does not currently believe that any such transactions are likely to be structured so as to
materially limit its ability to pay cash dividends on its common stock, if its board were to choose
to do so, or its ability to repurchase shares in the near term; there is no assurance that this
will remain true in the future); and (iv) its leverage position may limit funds available for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate purposes. Certain of
Bluegreens competitors operate on a less leveraged basis and have greater operating and financial
flexibility than they do.
Credit Facilities
The following is a discussion of Bluegreens material purchase and credit facilities,
including those that were important sources of its liquidity as of March 31, 2010. These
facilities do not constitute all of its outstanding indebtedness as of March 31, 2010. Bluegreens
other indebtedness includes outstanding junior subordinated debentures, borrowings collateralized
by real estate inventories that were not incurred pursuant to a significant credit facility, and
capital leases.
71
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Credit Facilities for Bluegreen Receivables with Future Availability
Bluegreen maintains various credit facilities with financial institutions that provide
receivable financing for its operations. Bluegreen had the following credit facilities with future
availability as of March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Advance | ||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Availability | Period | Borrowing | |||||||||||||||||
Revolving | Balance as | as of | Expiration; | Rate; Rate as | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowing | of March 31, | March 31, | Borrowing | of March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
Limit | 2010 | 2010 | Maturity | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
June 29, 2010; | Prime + 2.50%; | |||||||||||||||||||
BB&T Purchase
Facility(1) |
$ | 150,000 | $ | 122,302 | $ | 27,698 | June 5, 2022 | 5.75% | ||||||||||||
Aug. 27, 2010; | 30 day LIBOR+2.50%; | |||||||||||||||||||
Liberty Bank Facility(1) |
75,000 | 61,817 | 13,183 | Aug. 27, 2014 | 5.75%(2) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 225,000 | $ | 184,119 | $ | 40,881 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Facility is revolving during the advance period, providing additional availability as the facility is paid down, subject to eligible collateral and applicable terms and conditions. | |
(2) | Interest charged on this facility is variable, subject to a floor of 5.75%. |
BB&T Purchase Facility
The amended and restated timeshare notes receivable purchase facility with Branch Banking and
Trust Company (BB&T) (the BB&T Purchase Facility) provides for the sale of Bluegreens
timeshare receivables at an advance rate of 67.5% of the principal balance up to a cumulative
purchase price of $150.0 million on a revolving basis, subject to the terms of the facility,
eligible collateral and customary terms and conditions. The BB&T Purchase Facility revolving
advance period under the facility will end on June 29, 2010. Should a takeout financing (as
defined in the applicable facility agreements) occur prior to June 29, 2010, the facility limit
will either remain at the current facility limit of $150.0 million or decrease to $100.0 million,
under certain circumstances. While ownership of the receivables is transferred for legal purposes,
the transfers of receivables under the facility are accounted for as a financing transaction for
financial accounting purposes. Accordingly, the receivables are reflected as assets and the
associated obligations are reflected as liabilities on our Consolidated Statement of Financial
Condition. The BB&T Purchase Facility is nonrecourse and is not guaranteed by Bluegreen.
As of March 31, 2010, the outstanding balance of the BB&T Purchase Facility reflected a ratio
of outstanding advances to outstanding receivables transferred to BB&T under the facility of 79.6%;
however, Bluegreen will equally share with BB&T in the excess cash flows generated by the
receivables sold (excess meaning after customary payments of fees, interest and principal under the
facility) until the advance rate on the existing receivables decreases to 67.5% as the outstanding
balance amortizes. The interest rate on the BB&T Purchase Facility is the prime rate plus 2.5%.
During the first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen did not pledge any VOI notes receivable to this
facility. Bluegreen made repayments of $9.0 million on the facility during the first quarter of
2010.
Liberty Bank Facility
Bluegreen has a $75.0 million revolving timeshare receivables hypothecation facility with a
syndicate of lenders led by Liberty Bank and assembled by Wellington Financial (the Liberty Bank
Facility). The facility provides for a 90% advance on eligible receivables pledged under the
facility during a two-year period ending on August 27, 2010, subject to customary terms and
conditions. Amounts borrowed under the facility and interest incurred will be repaid as cash is
collected on the pledged receivables, with the remaining balance, if any, due on August 27, 2014.
The facility bears interest at a rate equal to the one-month LIBOR plus 2.5%, subject to a floor of
5.75%. As the Liberty Bank facility is revolving, availability under the facility increases up to
the $75.0 million
facility limit as cash is received on the VOI notes receivable collateralized under the
facility and Liberty Bank is repaid through the expiration of the advance period, pursuant to the
terms of the facility.
72
Table of Contents
Real Estate
During the first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen pledged $8.3 million of VOI notes receivable to
this facility and received cash proceeds of $7.5 million. Bluegreen also made repayments of $4.7
million under the facility during the first quarter of 2010.
In April 2010, Bluegreen transferred $1.2 million of VOI notes receivable to Liberty and
received cash proceeds of $1.1 million. Subsequent to this borrowing, and based on subsequent
repayments, Bluegreen had $13.4 million in availability under this facility.
Other Outstanding Receivable-Backed Notes Payable
Bluegreen has outstanding obligations under various receivable-backed credit facilities that
have no remaining future availability as the advance periods have expired. Bluegreen had the
following outstanding balances under such credit facilities as of March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Balance as | ||||||||||
of March | Borrowing Rate; Rate | |||||||||
31, 2010 | Borrowing Maturity | as of March 31, 2010 | ||||||||
The GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Facility
|
$ | 30,392 | April 16, 2016 | 30 day LIBOR+1.75%; | ||||||
2.00 | % | |||||||||
Wells Fargo Facility
|
11,279 | December 31, 2010 | Prime + 0.25-0.50%; | |||||||
4.00% (1) | ||||||||||
The GMAC Receivables Facility
|
4,701 | February 15, 2015 | 30 day LIBOR+4.00%; | |||||||
4.25 | % | |||||||||
Non-recourse Securitization Bonds
|
394,031 | Varies | Varies | |||||||
Total
|
$ | 440,403 | ||||||||
(1) | Interest charged on this facility is variable and may be subject to a 4.00% floor under certain circumstances. |
The GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Facility
The Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture has a $45.0 million revolving VOI receivables credit
facility with GE (the GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Receivables Facility). Bluegreen Corporation has
guaranteed the full payment and performance of the Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture in connection
with the GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Receivables Facility. The advance period under this facility has
expired and all outstanding borrowings mature no later than April 16, 2016. The facility has
detailed requirements with respect to the eligibility of receivables for inclusion and other
conditions to funding. The facility includes affirmative, negative and financial covenants and
events of default. All principal and interest payments received on pledged receivables are applied
to principal and interest due under the facility. During the first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen
repaid $2.4 million under this facility.
The Wells Fargo Facility
Bluegreen has a credit facility with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (Wells Fargo).
Historically, Bluegreen has primarily used this facility for borrowings collateralized by the
pledge of certain VOI receivables which typically have been Bluegreens one-year term receivables.
The borrowing period for advances on eligible receivables expired on December 31, 2009, and the
maturity date of all borrowings is December 31, 2010. The interest rate charged on outstanding
receivable borrowings under the facility, as amended, is the prime lending rate plus 0.25% when the
average monthly outstanding loan balance under certain sub-lines is greater than or equal to $15.0
million. If the average monthly outstanding loan balance under certain sub-lines is less than $15.0
million, the interest rate is the greater of 4.00% or the prime lending rate plus 0.50%. All
principal and interest payments
received on pledged receivables are applied to principal and interest due under the facility
and, during the first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen repaid $3.1 under this facility.
73
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Receivable-Backed Notes Payable previously reported as off-balance sheet.
See Note 14 of the Notes to our Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for information
related to the debt obligations that were previously reported off-balance sheet.
Other Effective Receivable Capacity.
Pursuant to the terms of certain of Bluegreens prior term securitizations and similar type
transactions, Bluegreen has the ability to substitute new eligible VOI notes receivable into such
facilities in the event receivables that were previously sold in such transactions default or are
the subject of an owner upgrade transaction, subject to certain limitations. These substitutions
result in Bluegreen receiving additional cash through its monthly distribution on its retained
interest in notes receivable sold. Bluegreen intends to continue to use this receivable capacity,
to the extent possible under the terms and conditions of the applicable facilities.
Credit Facilities for Bluegreen Inventories without Existing Future Availability
Bluegreen has outstanding obligations under various credit facilities and other notes payable
collateralized by its resorts or communities inventories. As of March 31, 2010 these included the
following significant items (in thousands):
Balance as of | ||||||||||
March 31, | Borrowing | Borrowing Rate; Rate as of | ||||||||
2010 | Maturity(1) | March 31, 2010 | ||||||||
The GMAC AD&C Facility
|
$ | 79,184 | June 30, 2012 | 30 day LIBOR+4.50%; | ||||||
4.75% | ||||||||||
The GMAC Communities Facility
|
36,886 | December 31, 2012 | Prime + 2.00%; | |||||||
10.00% | ||||||||||
The Textron Facility
|
12,551 | Varies by loan (2) | Prime + 1.25%-1.50%; | |||||||
4.50%-4.75% | ||||||||||
Wachovia Notes Payable
|
21,895 | Varies by loan (3) | 30 day LIBOR + 2.00%-2.35%; | |||||||
2.25%-2.60% | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 150,516 | ||||||||
(1) | Repayment of the outstanding amount is effected through release payments as the related collateral is sold, subject to periodic minimum required amortization between December 31, 2009 and maturity. | |
(2) | The maturity date for this facility varies by loan. The maturity date associated with Bluegreens Odyssey Dells Resort loan, which had an outstanding balance of $6.8 million as of March 31, 2010, is December 31, 2011. The maturity date associated with Bluegreens Atlantic Palace Resort, which had an outstanding balance of $5.8 million as of March 31, 2010, is April 2013. | |
(3) | See discussion of the Wells Fargo Loan below. |
The GMAC AD&C Facility
This facility was used to finance the acquisition and development of certain of Bluegreen
resorts and currently has three outstanding project loans. The maturity date for the project loan
collateralized by Bluegreens Club 36TM resort in Las Vegas, Nevada (the Club 36
Loan), is June 30, 2012. Approximately $68.9 million was outstanding on this loan as of March 31,
2010. Maturity dates for two project loans related to Bluegreens Fountains resort in Orlando,
Florida (the Fountains Loans) are September 2010 and March 2011, with $7.0 million and $3.3
million, respectively, outstanding as of March 31, 2010. Principal payments are effected through
agreed-upon
release prices as timeshare interests in the resorts collateralizing the GMAC AD&C Facility
are sold, subject to periodic minimum required amortization on the Club 36 Loan and the Fountains
Loans. The facility bears interest at a rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR plus 4.50%. As of March
31, 2010, Bluegreen had no availability under this facility. During the first quarter of 2010,
Bluegreen repaid $8.2 million on this facility.
74
Table of Contents
Real Estate
The GMAC Communities Facility (subsequently renamed in April to the H4BG, LP Facility)
Bluegreen has an outstanding balance under a credit facility (the GMAC Communities Facility)
historically used to finance its Bluegreen Communities real estate acquisitions and development
activities. The GMAC Communities Facility is secured by the real property homesites (and personal
property related thereto) at the following Bluegreen Communities projects (the Secured Projects):
Havenwood at Hunters Crossing (New Braunfels, Texas); The Bridges at Preston Crossings (Grayson
County, Texas); King Oaks (College Station, Texas); Vintage Oaks at the Vineyard (New Braunfels,
Texas); and Sanctuary Cove at St. Andrews Sound (Waverly, Georgia). In addition, the GMAC
Communities Facility is secured by certain of Bluegreens golf courses: The Bridges at Preston
Crossings (Grayson County, Texas) and Sanctuary Cove (Waverly, Georgia). The period during which
Bluegreen can add additional projects to the GMAC Communities Facility has expired.
The maturity date of this credit facility is December 31, 2012. Principal payments are
effected through agreed-upon release prices as real estate collateralizing the GMAC Communities
Facility is sold, subject to minimum required amortization. The interest rate on the GMAC
Communities Facility is the prime rate plus 2%, subject to the following floors: (1) 10% until the
balance of the loan is reduced to $32.6 million, (2) 8% until the balance of the loan is less than
or equal to $20 million, and (3) 6% thereafter.
During April 2010, GMAC assigned all rights, title, and interest in the GMAC Communities
Facility to H4BG, LP. This assignment did not affect any of the material financial terms of the
loan agreement, which will subsequently be called the H4BG, LP Communities Facility. During the
first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen repaid a total of $1.6 million under this facility.
Textron AD&C Facility
Bluegreen has an existing master acquisition, development and construction facility loan
agreement (the Textron AD&C Facility) with Textron Financial Corporation (Textron) with two
outstanding sub-loans and no future borrowing capacity. The sub-loan used to acquire and develop
Bluegreens Odyssey Dells resort in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin (the Odyssey Sub-Loan), had an
outstanding balance as of March 31, 2010 of approximately $6.8 million. Bluegreen pays Textron
principal payments as it sells timeshare interests that collateralize the Odyssey Sub-Loan subject
to periodic minimum required principal amortization. The final maturity of outstanding borrowings
under the Odyssey Sub-Loan is December 31, 2011.
The sub-loan used to acquire Bluegreens Atlantic Palace Resort in Atlantic City, New Jersey
had a balance of $5.8 million as of March 31, 2010 (the Atlantic Palace Sub-Loan). Bluegreen pays
Textron principal payments as it sells timeshare interests that collateralize the Atlantic Palace
Sub-Loan, subject to periodic minimum required principal amortization. The final maturity of
outstanding borrowings under the Atlantic Palace Sub-Loan is April 2013.
Bluegreen has guaranteed all sub-loans under the Textron AD&C Facility. Interest on the
Textron AD&C Facility is equal to the prime rate plus 1.25% 1.50% and is due monthly. During the
first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen repaid $0.2 million on this facility.
The Wachovia Notes Payable
As of March 31, 2010, Bluegreen had approximately $21.9 million of outstanding debt to
Wachovia Bank, N.A. (Wachovia) under various notes payable collateralized by certain of
Bluegreens timeshare resorts or sales offices (the Wachovia Notes Payable). During the first
quarter of 2010, Bluegreen made a required principal payment of $2.6 million related to the various
Wachovia Note Payable loans. In April 2010, Bluegreen executed an agreement with Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. to refinance the remaining $21.9 million outstanding under the Wachovia Notes Payable into a
new term loan. See Wells Fargo Term Loan below for further details.
75
Table of Contents
Real Estate
The Wells Fargo Term Loan
On April 30, 2010, Bluegreen entered into a definitive agreement with Wells Fargo, which
amended, restated and consolidated its notes payable to Wachovia and the line-of-credit issued by
Wachovia (discussed below) into a single term loan with Wells Fargo (the Wells Fargo Term Loan).
As described above, the notes payable and line of credit which were consolidated into the Wells
Fargo Term Loan had a total outstanding balance of $36.4 million as of April 30, 2010. In
connection with the closing of the Wells Fargo Term Loan, Bluegreen made a principal payment of
$0.4 million, reducing the balance to $36.0 million, and paid accrued interest on the existing
Wachovia debt. The Wells Fargo Term Loan is scheduled to mature on April 30, 2012 and bears
interest at 30-day LIBOR + 6.87%. Principal payments will be effected through agreed-upon release
prices as real estate collateralizing the Wells Fargo Term Loan is sold, subject to minimum
required amortization of $5.2 million in 2010, $10.6 million in 2011 and $20.2 million in 2012. In
addition to the resort projects previously pledged as collateral for the various notes payable to
Wachovia, Bluegreen pledged additional timeshare interests, resorts real estate, and the residual
interests in certain of its sold VOI notes receivables as collateral for the Wells Fargo Term Loan.
Wells Fargo has the right to receive as additional collateral, the residual interest in one future
transaction which creates such a retained interest.
Unsecured Credit Facility Wachovia Line-of-Credit
As of March 31, 2010, Bluegreen had an unsecured line-of-credit with Wachovia. During the
first quarter of 2010, Bluegreen repaid $1.2 million on this line-of-credit. In April 2010, the
remaining $14.5 million was refinanced by Wells Fargo under the Wells Fargo Term Loan discussed
above.
Commitments
Bluegreens material commitments as of March 31, 2010 included the required payments due on
its receivable-backed debt, lines-of-credit and other notes payable, commitments to complete its
Bluegreen Resorts and Communities projects based on its sales contracts with customers and
commitments under noncancelable operating leases.
The following table summarizes the contractual minimum principal and interest payments,
respectively, required on all of Bluegreens outstanding debt (including its receivable-backed
debt, lines-of-credit and other notes and debentures payable) and its noncancelable operating
leases by period date, as of March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Purchase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounting | Less than | 13 - 36 | 37 - 60 | More than | ||||||||||||||||||||
Category | Total | Adjustments | 12 Months | Months | Months | 60 Months | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt obligations |
$ | 847,468 | (59,617 | ) | 76,856 | 96,325 | 71,279 | 662,625 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest payable on debt
obligations |
577,986 | | 55,122 | 96,254 | 86,248 | 340,362 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noncancelable operating leases |
66,726 | | 10,747 | 15,876 | 10,052 | 30,051 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total obligations |
$ | 1,492,180 | (59,617 | ) | 142,725 | 208,455 | 167,579 | 1,033,038 | ||||||||||||||||
Bluegreen intends to use cash flow from operations, including cash received from the
sale/pledge of VOI notes receivable, and cash received from new borrowings under existing or future
debt facilities in order to satisfy the principal payments required on contractual obligations.
While this may not prove to be the case, Bluegreen believes that it will continue to be successful
in renewing certain debt facilities. Based on this and the expected positive impact on Bluegreens
financial position of the strategic initiatives implemented in the fourth quarter of 2008,
Bluegreen believes that it will be in a position to meet required debt payments when it expects
them to be ultimately due, however there can be no assurance that this will be the case.
Bluegreen estimates that the cash required to complete resort buildings, resort amenities and
other common costs in projects in which sales have occurred was approximately $1.0 million as of
March 31, 2010. Bluegreen estimates that the cash required to complete communities in which sales
have occurred was approximately $7.2 million as of March 31, 2010. These amounts assume that
Bluegreen is not obligated to develop any building, project or amenity in which a commitment has
not been made in a sales contract with a customer; however, Bluegreen anticipates that it will
incur such obligations in the future. Bluegreen plans to fund these expenditures over the next
three to ten years, primarily with cash generated from operations. There is no assurance that
Bluegreen will be able to generate the cash from operations necessary to complete the foregoing
commitments or that actual costs will not exceed those estimated.
76
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreen believes that its existing cash, anticipated cash generated from operations,
anticipated future permitted borrowings under existing or proposed credit facilities and
anticipated future sales of notes receivable under the purchase facilities and one or more
replacement facilities it intends to put in place will be sufficient to meet its anticipated
working capital, capital expenditures and debt service requirements for the foreseeable future,
subject to the successful implementation of ongoing strategic initiatives and debt maturity
extensions discussed above and the availability of credit. Bluegreen will continue its efforts to
renew or replace credit and receivables purchase facilities that have expired or that will expire
in the near term. Bluegreen will, in the future, also require additional credit facilities or will
be required to issue corporate debt or equity securities. Any debt incurred or issued by Bluegreen
may be secured or unsecured, bear fixed or variable rate interest and may be subject to such terms
as the lender may require and management believes acceptable. There can be no assurance that the
credit facilities or receivables purchase facilities which have expired or which are scheduled to
expire in the near term will be renewed or replaced or that sufficient funds will be available from
operations or under existing, proposed or future revolving credit or other borrowing arrangements
or receivables purchase facilities to meet Bluegreens cash needs, including its debt service
obligations. To the extent Bluegreen is not able to sell notes receivable or borrow under such
facilities; its ability to satisfy its obligations would be materially adversely affected.
Bluegreens credit facilities, indentures, and other outstanding debt instruments, and
receivables purchase facilities include, what Bluegreen believes to be, customary conditions to
funding, eligibility requirements for collateral, cross-default and other acceleration provisions,
certain financial and other affirmative and negative covenants, including, among others, limits on
the incurrence of indebtedness, the repurchase of securities, payment of dividends, investments in
joint ventures and other restricted payments, the incurrence of liens, and transactions with
affiliates, as well as covenants concerning net worth, fixed charge coverage requirements,
debt-to-equity ratios, portfolio performance requirements, cash balances and events of default or
termination. No assurance can be given that Bluegreen will not be required to seek waivers of such
covenants, that it will be successful in obtaining waivers, or that such covenants will not limit
its ability to raise funds, sell receivables, satisfy or refinance its obligations or otherwise
adversely affect its operations. Further, although Bluegreen does not currently believe that any
such transactions are likely to be structured so as to materially limit its ability to pay cash
dividends on its common stock or its ability to repurchase shares in the near term; there is,
although, no assurance this will remain true in the future. In addition, Bluegreens future
operating performance and ability to meet its financial obligations will be subject to future
economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which will be beyond
Bluegreens control.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Bluegreen historically monetized its notes receivables through various facilities and through
periodic term securitization transactions and other similar arrangements, many of which were
accounted for as sales of notes receivable under the accounting requirements in effect at the time.
As discussed further in Note 2 of our Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, on
January 1, 2010, Bluegreen adopted accounting rules that required it to consolidate seven existing
special purpose finance entities associated with prior securitization transactions that previously
qualified for off-balance sheet sales treatment. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2010, Bluegreen does
not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
77
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
Financial Services
The Financial Services activities of BFC are comprised of the operations of BankAtlantic
Bancorp and its subsidiaries. BankAtlantic Bancorp currently presents its results in two reportable
segments and its results of operations are consolidated in BFC Financial Corporation. The only
assets available to BFC Financial Corporation from BankAtlantic Bancorp are dividends when and if
paid by BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic Bancorp is a separate public company and its management
prepared the following discussion regarding BankAtlantic Bancorp which was included in BankAtlantic
Bancorps Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, references to we, us or our in the following
discussion under the caption Financial Services are references to BankAtlantic Bancorp and its
subsidiaries, and are not references to BFC Financial Corporation.
Consolidated Results of Operations
Loss from continuing operations from each of the Companys reportable segments was as follows
(in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Change | |||||||||
BankAtlantic |
$ | (17,129 | ) | $ | (40,589 | ) | $ | 23,460 | ||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent
Company |
(3,392 | ) | (6,022 | ) | 2,630 | |||||||
Loss from continuing
operations |
$ | (20,521 | ) | $ | (46,611 | ) | $ | 26,090 | ||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to the Same 2009 Period:
The decrease in BankAtlantics loss from continuing operations during the 2010 quarter
compared to the same 2009 quarter primarily resulted from an $11.5 million decline in the provision
for loan losses, $11.1 million of lower impairment charges and a reduction in operating expenses.
The above improvements in BankAtlantics performance were partially offset by a $3.6 million
decline in revenue from service charges on deposits and a $2.8 million decrease in net interest
income. The decline in the provision for loan losses for the 2010 quarter compared to the 2009
quarter resulted from a reduction in the allowance for loan losses during the 2010 quarter compared
to an increase in the allowance during the 2009 quarter. The reduction in the allowance for loan
losses during the 2010 quarter was primarily due to the disposition of certain non-performing
loans, declines in loan balances, and a stabilizing of our historical loss experience. The
allowance for loan losses during the 2009 quarter reflected deteriorating economic conditions and
adverse delinquency trends. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic recognized
a $9.1 million goodwill impairment charge and $1.9 million of termination costs associated with a
reduction in the workforce. BankAtlantic did not recognize a goodwill impairment charge or incur
termination costs during the 2010 quarter. BankAtlantics non-interest expenses excluding goodwill
impairment and termination costs declined by $7.8 million during the 2010 quarter compared to the
same 2009 quarter. This decline in expenses was primarily due to the 2009 workforce reductions, the
on-going consolidation of certain back-office facilities, renegotiation of vendor contracts and
general expense management efforts. The decline in service charges on deposits during the 2010
quarter compared to the 2009 quarter reflects a decline in the total number of accounts which
incurred overdraft fees and a decrease in the frequency of overdrafts per deposit account. We
believe that the decline in the number of accounts incurring overdraft fees is the result of both
our focus on targeting customers who maintain deposit accounts with higher balances and the result
of a change in customer behavior in response to the current public focus on bank overdraft fees.
The decline in BankAtlantics net interest income primarily resulted from lower earning asset
balances as BankAtlantic slowed the origination and purchase of loans, significantly reduced the
acquisition of tax certificates and sold agency securities.
The decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys loss for the 2010 quarter compared to
the same 2009 quarter resulted from a $0.5 million decline in net interest expenses and a $2.0
million improvement in the provision for loan losses. The lower net interest expense reflects a
significant decline in the three-month LIBOR interest rate from March 2009 to March 2010, as the
majority of BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys debentures are indexed to the three-month LIBOR
interest rate. The provision for loan losses during the 2010 quarter reflected a recovery of $1.3
million as BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company sold a builder land loan and recognized a recovery
of $1.8 million from the reversal of a specific valuation allowance.
78
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
During the 2009 quarter, BankAtlantic Bancorp recognized $4.2 million in discontinued
operations relating to additional Ryan Beck contingent earn-out payments under the Ryan Beck merger
agreement with Stifel. The earn-out period ended on February 28, 2009.
BankAtlantic Results of Operations
Net interest income
Bank Operations Business Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance Sheet - Yield / Rate Analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Average | Revenue/ | Yield/ | Average | Revenue/ | Yield/ | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 3,751,907 | 41,095 | 4.38 | $ | 4,355,818 | 49,607 | 4.56 | ||||||||||||||||
Investments |
441,637 | 6,136 | 5.56 | 935,936 | 12,803 | 5.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest earning assets |
4,193,544 | 47,231 | 4.51 | % | 5,291,754 | 62,410 | 4.72 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles |
15,652 | 25,971 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest earning assets |
475,310 | 356,514 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 4,684,506 | $ | 5,674,239 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings |
$ | 425,235 | 333 | 0.32 | % | $ | 441,278 | 500 | 0.46 | % | ||||||||||||||
NOW |
1,467,103 | 2,218 | 0.61 | 1,047,116 | 1,413 | 0.55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money market |
360,470 | 629 | 0.71 | 421,883 | 773 | 0.74 | ||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
896,074 | 3,877 | 1.75 | 1,300,056 | 10,301 | 3.21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing deposits |
3,148,882 | 7,057 | 0.91 | 3,210,333 | 12,987 | 1.64 | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowed funds |
39,376 | 13 | 0.13 | 278,209 | 182 | 0.27 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
173,011 | 958 | 2.25 | 903,077 | 7,164 | 3.22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
22,507 | 228 | 4.11 | 22,820 | 308 | 5.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
3,383,776 | 8,256 | 0.99 | 4,414,439 | 20,641 | 1.90 | ||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
864,391 | 775,977 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing other liabilities |
54,312 | 61,523 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
4,302,479 | 5,251,939 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
382,027 | 422,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 4,684,506 | $ | 5,674,239 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income/
net interest spread |
38,975 | 3.52 | % | 41,769 | 2.82 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Margin |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income/interest earning assets |
4.51 | % | 4.72 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense/interest earning assets |
0.80 | 1.58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin |
3.71 | % | 3.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to the Same 2009 Period:
The decrease in net interest income primarily resulted from a significant reduction in earning
assets partially offset by an improvement in the net interest spread and margin.
The decline in average earning assets reflects a management decision to slow the origination
and purchase of loans, sell agency securities and reduce the purchase of tax certificates in an
effort to enhance liquidity and improve regulatory capital ratios. BankAtlantic also experienced
significant residential loan repayments due to the large volume of loan refinancing associated with
low residential mortgage interest rates during 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. Investments
primarily consisted of agency mortgage-backed securities and tax certificates. As a
consequence, the average balance of earning assets declined by $1.1 billion during the three
months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same 2009 period. This decline in interest earning
assets significantly reduced our net interest income.
79
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The net interest spread and margin improved due to a change in our interest bearing liability
funding mix. BankAtlantic used the funds from the reduction in assets and deposit growth to repay
FHLB advances and short term wholesale borrowings. As a result, BankAtlantics funding mix changed
from higher rate FHLB advances to lower rate deposits which resulted in a substantial reduction in
BankAtlantics cost of funds. This improvement in the cost of funds was partially offset by
interest earning asset yield declines and changes in the earning asset portfolio mix from higher
yielding investments to lower yielding loans. The decline in average yields on loans reflects
lower interest rates during 2010 compared to 2009. The net interest spread and margin were also
favorably impacted by a significant increase in transaction accounts with a corresponding reduction
in certificate of deposit accounts. A portion of maturing certificate of deposit accounts either
transferred to transaction accounts or renewed at substantially lower interest rates. The higher
transaction account balances reflect the migration of retail certificate of deposit accounts to
transaction accounts and new customer acquisitions. Additionally, transaction account growth was
also favorably impacted by a shift of our advertising strategy to targeting potential customers
with higher deposit balances.
Asset Quality
The activity in BankAtlantics allowance for loan losses was as follows (in thousands):
For The Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 173,588 | 125,572 | |||||
Charge-offs
|
||||||||
Residential |
(4,181 | ) | (4,588 | ) | ||||
Commercial |
(21,332 | ) | (5,565 | ) | ||||
Consumer |
(10,771 | ) | (10,321 | ) | ||||
Small business |
(837 | ) | (2,771 | ) | ||||
Total Charge-offs |
(37,121 | ) | (23,245 | ) | ||||
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off |
1,047 | 792 | ||||||
Net (charge-offs) |
(36,074 | ) | (22,453 | ) | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
32,034 | 43,520 | ||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 169,548 | 146,639 | |||||
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, BankAtlantic recognized $13.5 million of
charge-offs related to two builder land bank loans that were sold to unrelated third parties. The
specific valuation allowances on these loans as of December 31, 2009 were $13.2 million.
Additionally, during the first quarter of 2010 BankAtlantic recognized a $3.4 million charge-off on
a $20 million residential land acquisition and development loan upon the sale of our participation
interest at a discount to the lead lender. The remaining commercial loan charge-offs during the
2010 quarter primarily related to residential land acquisition and development loans where updated
valuations reflected lower collateral values. The unemployment rates nationally and in Florida
have reached 9.7% and 12.3%, respectively, real estate values in Florida are forecast to decline
further and national and local economic measures remain weak. As a consequence, there is no
assurance that the credit quality of our loan portfolio will improve in subsequent periods and if
general economic conditions do not improve in Florida and nationwide, the credit quality of our
loan portfolio will continue to deteriorate and additional provisions for loan losses will be
required.
The decline in the provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2010
compared to the same 2009 period reflect lower loan portfolio balances and stabilizing delinquency
trends during 2010 compared to negative trends during 2009. Included in the $21.3 million
commercial real estate loan charge-offs were $16.9 million of charge-offs associated with these
loan sales.
80
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
At the indicated dates, BankAtlantics non-performing assets and potential problem loans
(contractually past due 90 days or more, performing impaired loans or restructured loans) were (in
thousands):
As of | ||||||||
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
NONPERFORMING ASSETS |
||||||||
Tax certificates |
$ | 1,495 | 2,161 | |||||
Commercial real estate (2) |
168,937 | 167,867 | ||||||
Consumer |
14,428 | 14,451 | ||||||
Small business |
10,971 | 9,338 | ||||||
Residential real estate (1) |
88,262 | 76,401 | ||||||
Commercial business |
18,767 | 18,063 | ||||||
Total nonaccrual assets (3) |
$ | 302,860 | 288,281 | |||||
Residential real estate owned |
$ | 10,176 | 9,607 | |||||
Commercial real estate owned |
29,503 | 25,442 | ||||||
Small business real estate owned |
784 | 580 | ||||||
Consumer real estate owned |
370 | 306 | ||||||
Other repossessed assets |
| 10 | ||||||
Total repossessed assets |
40,833 | 35,945 | ||||||
Total nonperforming assets |
$ | 343,693 | 324,226 | |||||
Allowances |
||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
$ | 169,548 | 173,588 | |||||
Allowance for tax certificate losses |
7,341 | 6,781 | ||||||
Total allowances |
$ | 176,889 | 180,369 | |||||
POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS |
||||||||
Contractually past due 90 days or more (4) |
$ | 366 | 9,960 | |||||
Performing impaired loans (5) |
1,685 | 6,150 | ||||||
Troubled debt restructured |
124,851 | 107,642 | ||||||
TOTAL POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS |
$ | 126,902 | 123,752 | |||||
(1) | Includes $45.8 million and $41.3 million of interest-only residential loans as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. | |
(2) | Excluded from the above table as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $35.3 million and $44.9 million, respectively, of commercial residential loans that were transferred to a work-out subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company in March 2008. | |
(3) | Includes $57.4 million and $45.7 million of troubled debt restructured loans as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. | |
(4) | The majority of these loans have matured and the borrower continues to make payments under the matured loan agreement or the loan has sufficient collateral that we believe is sufficient to prevent a loss. | |
(5) | BankAtlantic believes that it will ultimately collect the principal and interest associated with these loans; however, the timing of the payments may not be in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. |
Non-performing assets were higher at March 31, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009 primarily
due to a $15.2 million increase in non-accrual loans and a $4.9 million increase in real estate
owned.
The increase in non-accrual loans at March 31, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009 reflects
higher residential non-accrual loans. The increase in residential non-accrual loans was primarily
the result of a prolonged foreclosure process. Residential loan delinquencies have remained stable
for the last twelve months; however, the foreclosure processes vary by state and can currently take
more than 15 months to complete. We believe that the time to complete foreclosures may improve in
subsequent periods which may result in lower non-accrual residential loan balances and higher
residential real estate owned. Non-accrual commercial loans increased slightly from December 2009.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, BankAtlantic sold two non-accrual loans with
outstanding aggregate balances of $18.8 million as of December 31, 2009, transferred one $3.6
million loan to real estate owned, placed $29.3 million of loans on non-accrual, charged-off $21.3
million of loans and moved one $6.5 million loan to accruing. Non-accrual commercial loans have
trended overall downward since the first quarter of
2009 as the balance of our commercial residential loans has significantly declined.
Approximately 45% of the commercial real estate portfolio was evaluated for potential impairment
and specific reserves were established when necessary. However, if the national economy
deteriorates further, the current high unemployment continues, and home prices continue to decline,
then we would expect elevated delinquencies and increased losses in our loan portfolio.
81
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The allowance for tax certificate losses at March 31, 2010 compared to December 2009 reflects
adverse real estate market conditions in our out-of-state tax certificate portfolio.
The higher balance of repossessed assets at March 31, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009
reflects foreclosures of commercial real estate and residential loans. BankAtlantic attempts to
modify loans to credit-worthy borrowers; however, the majority of BankAtlantics non-accrual
commercial real estate loans are collateral dependent which leaves BankAtlantic few viable options
other than initiating the foreclosure process. Based on the current amount of non-accrual loans, we
expect repossessed assets to increase in the future.
BankAtlantics potential problem loans at March 31, 2010 increased compared to December 31,
2009 primarily due to an increase in commercial real estate troubled debt restructured loans. In
response to current market conditions, BankAtlantic has made the decision to modify loans for
certain borrowers experiencing financial difficulties and has modified the terms of certain
commercial, small business, residential and consumer home equity loans during the three months
ended March 31, 2010. Generally, the concessions made to borrowers experiencing financial
difficulties may include the reduction of the loans contractual interest rate, forgiveness of loan
principal upon satisfactory performance under the modified terms, conversion of amortizing loans to
interest only payments or the deferral of some interest payments to the maturity date of the loan.
Loans that are not delinquent at the date of modification are generally not placed on non-accrual.
Modified non-accrual loans are not returned to an accruing status and BankAtlantic does not reset
days past due on delinquent modified loans until the borrower demonstrates a sustained period of
performance under the modified terms, which is generally performance over a six month period.
However, there is no assurance that the modification of loans will result in increased collections
from the borrower or that modified loans which return to an accruing status will not subsequently
return to non-accrual status.
BankAtlantics troubled debt restructured loans by loan type were as follows (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Non-accrual | Accruing | Non-accrual | Accruing | |||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 43,526 | 100,706 | 32,225 | 83,768 | |||||||||||
Small business |
4,527 | 7,210 | 4,520 | 7,325 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
1,181 | 13,263 | 1,774 | 12,969 | ||||||||||||
Residential |
8,136 | 3,672 | 7,178 | 3,580 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 57,370 | 124,851 | 45,697 | 107,642 | |||||||||||
82
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
Commercial residential loans continue to constitute the majority of non-performing commercial
real estate loans; however, BankAtlantic is experiencing unfavorable credit quality trends in
commercial loans collateralized by commercial land and retail income producing properties and may
experience higher non-performing loans in these loan categories in future periods. BankAtlantics
commercial loan portfolio includes large loan balance lending relationships. Seven relationships
accounted for 54.5% of our $165.2 million of non-accrual commercial real estate loans as of March
31, 2010.
The following table outlines general information about these relationships as of March 31,
2010 (in thousands):
Unpaid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | Outstanding | Specific | Date loan | Date Placed | Default | Collateral | Date of Last | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationships | Balance | Balance (6) | Reserves | Originated | on Nonaccrual | Date (4) | Type | Full Appraisal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Land
Developers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 1 (1) (2) |
$ | 26,731 | 19,200 | 1,367 | Q3-2004 | Q4-2008 | Q4-2008 | Land A&D (5) | Q4-2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 2 (1) |
12,500 | 10,064 | 5,053 | Q3-2006 | Q1-2009 | Q1-2009 | Land A&D (5) | Q1-2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 3 (1), (3) |
14,030 | 10,901 | 5,846 | Q3-2004 | Q4-2008 | Q1-2009 | Builder Land | Q4-2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 53,261 | 40,165 | 12,266 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Land
Developers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 4 |
$ | 17,777 | 17,777 | 6,947 | Q3-2006 | Q1-2010 | Q1-2010 | Commercial mixed-use | Q4-2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 5 |
12,792 | 12,792 | 4,860 | Q2-2006 | Q4-2009 | Q4-2009 | Commercial land A&D | Q1-2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 6 |
8,625 | 8,625 | | Q2-2005 | Q1-2010 | Q1-2010 | Commercial Land | Q4-2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 7 |
10,779 | 10,779 | 135 | Q3-2007 | Q4-2009 | Q3-2009 | Commercial Land | Q4-2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
49,973 | 49,973 | 11,942 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of Large Relationships |
$ | 103,234 | 90,138 | 24,208 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | During 2009, BankAtlantic recognized partial charge-offs on relationships Nos. 1, 2, and 3 aggregating $11.2 million. | |
(2) | During 2010, BankAtlantic recognized partial charge-offs on relationship No. 1 of $1.0 million. | |
(3) | A modification was executed, and the loan is reported as a troubled debt restructured loan but is currently not in default. | |
(4) | The default date is defined as the date of the initial missed payment prior to default. | |
(5) | Acquisition and development (A&D). | |
(6) | Outstanding balance is the Unpaid Principal Balance less write-downs. |
The loans that comprise the above relationships are all collateral dependent. As such, we
established specific reserves or recognized partial charge-offs on these loans based on our
determination of the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell. The fair value of the
collateral was determined using third party appraisals. BankAtlantic performs quarterly impairment
analyses on these credit relationships and appraised values are reduced further if market
conditions significantly deteriorate subsequent to the appraisal date. However, BankAtlantics
policy is to obtain a full appraisal within one year from the date of the prior appraisal unless
the loan is in the process of foreclosure. A new appraisal is obtained at the date of foreclosure.
Our residential loan portfolio does not include negative amortization, option ARM or subprime
products; however, the majority of our residential loans are purchased residential jumbo loans and
certain of these loans could potentially have outstanding loan balances significantly higher than
related collateral values as a result of declines in residential real estate values. Loans that
were originated during 2005, 2006 and 2007 have experienced greater deterioration in collateral
value than loans originated in prior years resulting in higher loss experiences in these groups of
loans. Also, California, Florida, Arizona and Nevada are states that have experienced elevated
foreclosures and delinquency rates.
Our purchased residential loan portfolio includes interest-only loans. The terms of these
loans provide for possible future increases in a borrowers loan payments when the contractually
required repayments increase due to interest rate changes and the required amortization of the
principal amount begins. These payment increases could affect a borrowers ability to meet the
debt service on or repay the loan and lead to increased defaults and losses which could result in
additional provisions for residential loan losses.
83
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
At March 31, 2010, BankAtlantics residential loan portfolio included $704.6 million of
interest-only
loans. Approximately $10.9 million of these interest only residential loans became fully
amortizing during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and interest-only residential loans
scheduled to reset during the remaining nine months of 2010 and during the year ending December 31,
2011 are $32.3 million and $60.8 million, respectively.
The following table presents our purchased residential loans by year of origination segregated
by amortizing and interest only loans (dollars in thousands):
Amortizing Purchased Residential Loans | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | LTV at | Current | FICO Scores | Current | Amount | Debt Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year of Origination | Amount | Origination | LTV (1) | at Origination | FICO Scores (2) | Delinquent | at Origination (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 48,797 | 64.33 | % | 110.85 | % | 743 | 744 | $ | 3,928 | 31.96 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2006 |
57,509 | 70.80 | % | 120.56 | % | 736 | 723 | 4,460 | 35.58 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
39,585 | 73.25 | % | 114.72 | % | 724 | 715 | 7,576 | 36.78 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
363,275 | 68.01 | % | 80.76 | % | 736 | 728 | 25,575 | 34.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Prior to 2004 |
176,249 | 67.52 | % | 59.53 | % | 730 | 734 | 9,031 | 31.95 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest-Only Purchased Residential Loans | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | LTV at | Current | FICO Scores | Current | Amount | Debt Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year of Origination | Amount | Origination | LTV (1) | at Origination | FICO Scores (2) | Delinquent | at Origination (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 94,770 | 71.99 | % | 129.16 | % | 751 | 738 | $ | 18,052 | 33.91 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2006 |
206,329 | 74.02 | % | 125.33 | % | 741 | 736 | 31,995 | 34.96 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
220,152 | 70.08 | % | 113.83 | % | 740 | 749 | 12,995 | 34.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
92,924 | 70.54 | % | 96.04 | % | 743 | 718 | 6,576 | 31.68 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Prior to 2004 |
90,425 | 58.74 | % | 77.84 | % | 742 | 747 | 3,410 | 31.28 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
The following table presents our purchased residential loans by geographic area segregated by
amortizing and interest-only loans (dollars in thousands):
Amortizing Purchased Residential Loans | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | LTV at | Current | FICO Scores | Current | Amount | Debt Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||
State | Amount | Origination | LTV (1) | at Origination | FICO Scores (2) | Delinquent | at Origination (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arizona |
$ | 11,298 | 66.68 | % | 119.10 | % | 728 | 722 | $ | 1,282 | 32.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||
California |
166,115 | 67.63 | % | 80.26 | % | 740 | 738 | 13,843 | 34.85 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Florida |
89,727 | 70.65 | % | 99.95 | % | 721 | 712 | 11,834 | 35.52 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Nevada |
6,042 | 72.16 | % | 119.41 | % | 736 | 728 | 637 | 36.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Other States |
412,233 | 67.96 | % | 79.41 | % | 734 | 732 | 23,249 | 33.54 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest-Only Purchased Residential Loans | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | LTV at | Current | FICO Scores | Current | Amount | Debt Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||
State | Amount | Origination | LTV (1) | at Origination | FICO Scores (2) | Delinquent | at Origination (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arizona |
$ | 21,215 | 70.40 | % | 142.29 | % | 752 | 740 | $ | 4,188 | 32.69 | % | ||||||||||||||||
California |
198,259 | 70.59 | % | 109.05 | % | 741 | 734 | 28,636 | 33.95 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Florida |
49,431 | 68.58 | % | 136.12 | % | 748 | 740 | 10,223 | 31.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Nevada |
9,710 | 71.92 | % | 186.26 | % | 745 | 736 | 3,989 | 34.90 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Other States |
425,985 | 70.06 | % | 108.04 | % | 742 | 743 | 25,992 | 33.84 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Current loan-to-values (LTV) for the majority of the portfolio were obtained as of the first quarter of 2010 from automated valuation models. | |
(2) | Current FICO scores based on borrowers for which FICO scores were available as of the third quarter of 2009. | |
(3) | Debt ratio is defined as the portion of the borrowers income that goes towards debt service. |
84
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The table below presents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses (ALL) by various
loan classifications, the percent of allowance to each loan category (ALL to gross loans percent)
and the percentage of loans in each category to gross loans (Loans to gross loans percent). The
allowance shown in the table should not be interpreted as an indication that charge-offs in future
periods will occur in these amounts or percentages or that the allowance accurately reflects future
charge-off amounts or trends (dollars in thousands):
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
ALL | Loans | ALL | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||
to gross | by | to gross | by | |||||||||||||||||||||
ALL | loans | category | ALL | Loans | category | |||||||||||||||||||
by | in each | to gross | by | in each | to gross | |||||||||||||||||||
category | category | loans | category | category | loans | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial business |
$ | 7,397 | 5.43 | % | 3.65 | % | $ | 4,515 | 2.94 | % | 3.94 | % | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
86,086 | 7.57 | 30.47 | 91,658 | 7.71 | 30.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Small business |
6,565 | 2.13 | 8.28 | 7,998 | 2.56 | 8.02 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
29,582 | 2.00 | 39.56 | 27,000 | 1.74 | 39.85 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
39,918 | 5.93 | 18.04 | 42,417 | 6.14 | 17.70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total allowance for
loan losses |
$ | 169,548 | 4.54 | % | 100.00 | % | $ | 173,588 | 4.45 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Included in the allowance for loan losses as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were
specific reserves by loan type as follows (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Commercial real estate |
$ | 40,927 | 42,523 | |||||
Commercial business |
5,982 | 174 | ||||||
Small business |
1,768 | 753 | ||||||
Consumer |
4,253 | 4,621 | ||||||
Residential |
12,200 | 8,784 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 65,130 | 56,855 | |||||
The decrease in the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009
primarily resulted from a decline in the allowance for consumer, commercial real estate, and small
business loans partially offset by an increase in the residential and commercial business
allowance. The decline in the consumer allowance reflects lower loan balances and the
stabilization of delinquency and charge-off trends. The allowance for commercial real estate loans
declined due to loan repayments and loan sales aggregating $50.6 million. The reduction in the
small business allowance reflects improvement in historical loss experience as well as the
stabilization of delinquencies. The significant increase in the commercial business allowance
resulted from the establishment of $5.9 million of specific valuation allowances on two business
loans. The higher residential allowance reflects increased non-accrual loan balances partially
offset by a decline in delinquency trends excluding non-accrual loans, and lower loan balances.
85
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantics Non-Interest Income
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Change | |||||||||
Service charges on deposits |
$ | 15,048 | 18,685 | (3,637 | ) | |||||||
Other service charges and fees |
7,378 | 7,025 | 353 | |||||||||
Securities activities, net |
3,132 | 4,320 | (1,188 | ) | ||||||||
Income from unconsolidated companies |
| 78 | (78 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
3,183 | 2,757 | 426 | |||||||||
Non-interest income |
$ | 28,741 | 32,865 | (4,124 | ) | |||||||
The lower revenues from service charges on deposits during the 2010 quarter compared to the
2009 quarter primarily resulted from lower overdraft fee income. This decrease in overdraft fee
income reflects a decline in the total number of accounts which incurred overdraft fees and a
decrease in the frequency of overdrafts per deposit account. We believe that the decline in the
number of accounts incurring overdraft fees is the result of our focus on targeting customers who
maintain deposit accounts with higher balances and the result of a change in customer behavior.
The Federal Reserve has recently adopted new overdraft rules effective July 1, 2010, which among
other requirements, prohibit banks from automatically enrolling customers in overdraft protection
programs. Additionally, Congress has proposed legislation to further limit the assessment of
overdraft fees and banking regulators have issued new guidance and best practices related to
overdraft fee assessments. This legislation and current public focus on overdraft fees may result
in further declines in our overdraft fee income in future periods.
The increase in other service charges and fees during the three months ended March 31, 2010
compared to the same 2009 period was primarily due to an increase in interchange income based, we
believe, on increased spending by our customers reflecting improved economic conditions during 2010
compared to 2009.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, BankAtlantic sold $47.1 million of agency
securities for a $3.1 million gain. The net proceeds of $43.8 million from the sales were used to
pay down FHLB advance borrowings. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic sold
$149.1 million of agency securities available for sale for a $4.3 million gain.
Income from unconsolidated companies during the three months ended March 31, 2009 represented
equity earnings from a joint venture that engages in accounts receivable factoring. The factoring
joint venture was consolidated as of January 1, 2010 upon the implementation of new accounting
guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities.
The increase in other non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared
to the same 2009 period was primarily the result of $0.4 million of factoring fees recognized in
other income upon the consolidation the factoring joint venture.
86
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantics Non-Interest Expense
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Change | |||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
$ | 24,374 | 28,078 | (3,704 | ) | |||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
13,581 | 14,910 | (1,329 | ) | ||||||||
Advertising and business promotion |
1,934 | 2,781 | (847 | ) | ||||||||
Check losses |
432 | 844 | (412 | ) | ||||||||
Professional fees |
2,565 | 2,944 | (379 | ) | ||||||||
Supplies and postage |
965 | 1,000 | (35 | ) | ||||||||
Telecommunication |
529 | 694 | (165 | ) | ||||||||
Cost associated with debt redemption |
7 | 591 | (584 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring charges and exit
activities |
| 1,874 | (1,874 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for tax certificates |
733 | 1,486 | (753 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
| 9,124 | (9,124 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
7,601 | 7,377 | 224 | |||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
$ | 52,721 | 71,703 | (18,982 | ) | |||||||
The substantial decline in employee compensation and benefits during the three months ended
March 31, 2010 compared to the same 2009 period resulted primarily from a decline in the
workforce, including a workforce reduction of 130 associates, or 7%, in March 2009. As a
consequence of the work force reduction and attrition, the number of full-time equivalent
employees declined from 1,770 at December 31, 2008 to 1,520 at March 31, 2010, or a 14% reduction.
The decline in the workforce resulted in lower employee benefits, payroll taxes and recruitment
advertising. Also contributing $0.8 million to the decline in employee compensation and benefits
was the discontinuation of the 401(k) Plan employee match in April 2009 and lower pension expenses
due to the appreciation of pension assets during the year ended December 31, 2009.
The decline in occupancy and equipment primarily resulted from the consolidation of
back-office facilities and lower depreciation expense. Depreciation expense declined by $0.6
million and building maintenance, rent expense and utilities declined by $0.6 million during the
2010 quarter compared to the same 2009 period.
BankAtlantic changed its advertising focus from growing deposit account volume to enhancing
BankAtlantics relationship with its customers. As a result, BankAtlantic reduced direct mail
advertising and reduced gifts to customers upon the opening of deposit accounts. Direct mail
advertising and customer gift expenses declined by $1.0 million during the three months ended March
31, 2010 compared to the same 2009 period.
The lower check losses for the 2010 quarter compared to the same 2009 period were primarily
related to more stringent overdraft policies as well as a lower volume of new accounts.
The decline in professional fees for the 2010 quarter compared to the 2009 quarter primarily
resulted from the receipt of $1.7 million of insurance reimbursements in connection with legal
costs associated with the class action securities litigation. During the three months ended March
31, 2010, the litigation costs exceeded the deductible under our director and officer liability
insurance and we began receiving cost reimbursements from the insurance carrier for 80% of the
claims submitted. Insurance claim reimbursements are recognized as a reduction to legal fees when
received. The filing of director and officer liability claims is on-going and we expect to
receive partial reimbursement for litigation costs associated with securities litigation in future
periods.
The lower telecommunication costs for the 2010 quarter primarily reflects the consolidation of
back-office operations during 2009.
The costs associated with debt redemptions during the three months ended March 31, 2010 were
the result of the prepayment of a $0.7 million mortgage-backed bond that was scheduled to mature
in September 2013. The costs associated with debt redemptions during the three months ended March
31, 2009 were the result of prepayment penalties incurred upon the prepayment of $249.6 million of
FHLB advances.
87
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The restructuring charge for the 2009 quarter reflects one-time termination costs incurred as
a result of the workforce reduction discussed above.
The provision for tax certificates losses during the 2010 and 2009 quarters reflects higher
charge-offs and increases in tax certificate reserves for certain out-of-state certificates
acquired in distressed markets. We have significantly reduced the acquisition of out-of state tax
certificates and continue to concentrate the majority of our tax certificate acquisitions in
Florida.
BankAtlantic tests goodwill for potential impairment annually or during interim periods if
impairment indicators exist. Based on the results of an interim impairment evaluation, BankAtlantic
recorded an impairment charge of $9.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
BankAtlantic had remaining goodwill of $13.1 million relating to its capital services reporting
unit included in its statement of condition as of March 31, 2010. If market conditions do not
improve or deteriorate further, BankAtlantic may incur additional goodwill impairment charges in
future periods.
The increase in other non-interest expense for the 2010 quarter compared to the 2009 quarter
was primarily the result of higher deposit insurance premiums. BankAtlantics deposit insurance
premium increased from $1.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009 to $2.4 million
during the same 2010 period. These higher deposit insurance premiums were partially offset by
lower general operating expenses during the 2010 quarter compared to the 2009 quarter reflecting
managements expense reduction initiatives.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company Results of Operations
For the Three Months | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Ended March 31, | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
Net interest (expense) |
$ | (3,485 | ) | (4,021 | ) | 536 | ||||||
Recovery/(provision) for loan losses |
1,279 | (757 | ) | 2,036 | ||||||||
Net interest (expense) after provision
for loan losses |
(2,206 | ) | (4,778 | ) | 2,572 | |||||||
Non-interest income |
458 | 460 | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Non-interest expense |
1,644 | 1,704 | (60 | ) | ||||||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent company
(loss) |
$ | (3,392 | ) | (6,022 | ) | 2,630 | ||||||
Net interest expense declined during the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same 2009
period as a result of lower average interest rates during the 2010 period partially offset by
higher debenture average balances. Average rates on junior subordinated debentures decreased from
5.83% during the three months ended March 31, 2009 to 4.68% during the same 2010 period reflecting
lower LIBOR interest rates during the 2010 quarter compared to the 2009 quarter. The average
balances on junior subordinated debentures increased from $294 million during 2009 to $309 million
during 2010. The increase in average debenture balances resulted from the deferral of interest
which began in March 2009.
Non-interest income remained at 2009 levels. The increased equity earnings from BankAtlantic
Bancorp Parent Companys investment in statutory business trusts that issue trust preferred
securities and higher fees received from BankAtlantic for executive management services were offset
by lower gains on the sales of securities. During the three months ended March 31, 2009,
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company sold 250,233 shares of Stifel common stock received in
connection with the contingent earn-out payment from the sale of Ryan Beck for a $120,000 gain.
There were no sales of securities for gains during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Non-interest expense declined slightly from 2009 levels. Lower foreclosure expenses during
2010 compared to 2009 were offset by higher compensation expenses. The decline in foreclosure
expenses reflects a decline in the number of non-performing loans during 2010 compared to 2009.
The increase in compensation expenses primarily resulted from higher incentive bonus expenses
during the current quarter compared to the same 2009 period.
88
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
In March 2008, BankAtlantic transferred non-performing loans to a work-out subsidiary of
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company. The composition of these loans as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 was as follows (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Nonaccrual loans: |
||||||||
Commercial residential real estate: |
||||||||
Builder land bank loans |
$ | 5,977 | 14,060 | |||||
Land acquisition and development |
10,376 | 10,376 | ||||||
Land acquisition, development and
construction |
13,450 | 14,903 | ||||||
Total commercial residential real estate |
29,803 | 39,339 | ||||||
Commercial non-residential real estate |
5,523 | 5,558 | ||||||
Total non-accrual loans |
35,326 | 44,897 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses specific reserves |
(8,049 | ) | (13,630 | ) | ||||
Non-accrual loans, net |
27,277 | 31,267 | ||||||
Performing commercial non-residential loans |
3,037 | 3,116 | ||||||
Loans receivable, net |
$ | 30,314 | 34,383 | |||||
Real estate owned |
$ | 10,532 | 10,532 | |||||
During the first quarter of 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company foreclosed on a $7.9
million builder land bank loan with a $4.5 million specific reserve and sold the collateral for
cash proceeds of $5.2 million. The cash proceeds were received in April 2010. The work-out
subsidiary also received $0.2 million from loan principal repayments during the quarter, recognized
$4.3 million of charge-offs and reversed $5.6 million of specific reserves associated with these
charge-offs.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys non-accrual loans include large loan balance lending
relationships. Three relationships account for 53% of its $35.3 million of non-accrual loans as of
March 31, 2010. The following table outlines general information about these relationships as of
March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Unpaid | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | Outstanding | Specific | Date loan | Date Placed | Default | Collateral | Date of Last | |||||||||||||||
Relationships | Balance | Balance (5) | Reserves | Originated | on Nonaccrual | Date(3) | Type (4) | Full Appraisal | ||||||||||||||
Residential Land Developers |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 1
|
$ | 7,382 | $ | 7,382 | $ | 2,870 | Jan-06 | Q1-2008 | Q1-2008 | Land A&D | Q2-2009 | |||||||||||
Relationship No. 2 (1)
|
20,000 | 5,977 | | Mar-05 | Q3-2007 | Q1-2008 | Builder Land | Q3-2009 | ||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 3 (2)
|
9,833 | 5,225 | | Apr-04 | Q3-2007 | Q4-2007 | Land AD&C | Q1-2010 | ||||||||||||||
37,215 | 18,584 | 2,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | During 2008, 2009 and 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp recognized partial charge-offs on relationship No. 2 aggregating $13.9 million. | |
(2) | During 2008, 2009 and 2010, BankAtlantic recognized partial charge-offs on relationship No. 3 aggregating $4.6 million. | |
(3) | The default date is defined as the date of the initial missed payment prior to default. | |
(4) | Acquisition and development (A&D). | |
(5) | Outstanding balance is the Unpaid Principal Balance less write-downs. |
The loans that comprise the above relationships are all collateral dependent. As such, we
established specific reserves or recognized partial charge-offs on these loans based on the fair
value of the collateral less costs to sell. The fair value of the collateral was determined using
third party appraisals for all relationships. Management performs quarterly impairment analyses on
these credit relationships subsequent to the date of the appraisal and may reduce appraised values
if market conditions significantly deteriorate subsequent to the appraisal date. However, our
policy is to obtain a full appraisal within one year from the date of the prior appraisal, unless
the loan is in the process of foreclosure. A full appraisal is obtained at the date of
foreclosure.
89
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The activity in BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys allowance for loan losses was as follows
(in thousands):
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 13,630 | 11,685 | |||||
Loans charged-off |
(4,302 | ) | (684 | ) | ||||
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off |
| | ||||||
Net (charge-offs) |
(4,302 | ) | (684 | ) | ||||
(Recovery)/provision for loan losses |
(1,279 | ) | 757 | |||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 8,049 | 11,758 | |||||
The $4.3 million of charge-offs primarily related to two loans. One loan was charged-down
$2.7 million upon the foreclosure and sale of the collateral. The other loans entire balance of
$1.2 million was charged-off upon the sale of the remaining collateral. BankAtlantic Bancorp
Parent Company established specific reserves of $5.7 million on these two loans in prior periods
and recognized a recovery for loan losses on the sale of these loans during the three months ended
March 31, 2010.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company recognized a
$0.7 million charge-off associated with the foreclosure of a loan.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. Liquidity and Capital Resources
Currently, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Companys principal source of liquidity is its cash and
funds obtained from its wholly-owned work-out subsidiary. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company also
may obtain funds through dividends, and issuance of equity and debt securities, although no
dividends from BankAtlantic are anticipated or contemplated in the foreseeable future. BankAtlantic
Bancorp Parent Company has historically used its funds to contribute capital to its subsidiaries,
pay debt service and shareholder dividends, repay borrowings, invest in equity securities and other
investments, and fund operations, including funding servicing costs and real estate owned operating
expenses of its wholly-owned work-out subsidiary. At March 31, 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp had
approximately $311.7 million of junior subordinated debentures outstanding with maturities ranging
from 2032 through 2037. The aggregate annual interest obligations on this indebtedness totaled
approximately $13.7 million based on interest rates at March 31, 2010 and are generally indexed to
three-month LIBOR. In order to preserve liquidity in the current economic environment,
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company elected in February 2009 to commence deferring interest
payments on all of its outstanding junior subordinated debentures and to cease paying cash
dividends on its common stock. The terms of the junior subordinated debentures and the trust
documents allow BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company to defer payments of interest for up to 20
consecutive quarterly periods without default or penalty. During the deferral period, the
respective trusts have suspended the declaration and payment of dividends on the trust preferred
securities. The deferral election began as of March 2009, and regularly scheduled quarterly
interest payments aggregating $17.5 million that would otherwise have been paid during the fifteen
months ended March 31, 2010 were deferred. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company has the ability
under the junior subordinated debentures to continue to defer interest payments through ongoing
appropriate notices to each of the trustees, and will make a decision each quarter as to whether to
continue the deferral of interest. During the deferral period, interest will continue to accrue on
the junior subordinated debentures at the stated coupon rate, including on the deferred interest,
and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company will continue to record the interest expense associated
with the junior subordinated debentures. During the deferral period, BankAtlantic Bancorp may not,
among other things and with limited exceptions, pay cash dividends on or repurchase its common
stock nor make any payment on outstanding debt obligations that rank equally with or junior to the
junior subordinated debentures. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company may end the deferral by paying
all accrued and unpaid interest. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company anticipates that it will
continue to defer interest on its junior subordinated debentures and will not pay dividends on its
common stock for the foreseeable future. If
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company continues to defer interest on its junior subordinated
debentures through the year ended December 31, 2013, it will owe an aggregate of approximately
$72.3 million of unpaid interest based on average interest rates as of March 31, 2010.
BankAtlantic Bancorps financial condition and liquidity could be adversely affected if interest
payments were deferred for a prolonged time period.
90
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
During the year ended December 31, 2009 and during the three months ended March 31, 2010,
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company did not receive dividends from BankAtlantic. The ability of
BankAtlantic to pay dividends or make other distributions to BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company in
subsequent periods is subject to regulations and Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) approval and
is based upon BankAtlantics regulatory capital levels and net income. Because BankAtlantic has an
accumulated deficit during the prior two years, BankAtlantic is required to file an application to
receive approval of the OTS in order to pay dividends to BankAtlantic Bancorp. The OTS would not
approve any distribution that would cause BankAtlantic to fail to meet its capital requirements or
if the OTS believes that a capital distribution by BankAtlantic constitutes an unsafe or unsound
action or practice, and there is no assurance that the OTS will approve future capital
distributions from BankAtlantic. BankAtlantic has not filed an application with the OTS for
approval to pay a dividend since September 2008 and BankAtlantic Bancorp does not expect to receive
cash dividends from BankAtlantic during 2010, and possibly longer. However, BankAtlantic Bancorp
may receive dividends from its asset work-out subsidiary upon the monetizing of the subsidiaries
non-performing loans. There is no assurance that BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company will be able
to monetize the loans on acceptable terms, if at all.
During January 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp commenced cash offers to purchase all outstanding
trust preferred securities having an aggregate principal amount of approximately $285 million at a
purchase price of $200 per $1,000 liquidation amount, or an aggregate of $57 million. During
February 2010, the offer to purchase with respect to the approximate $55 million of publicly traded
trust preferred securities issued by BBC Capital Trust II expired without any such trust preferred
securities being repurchased, while the expiration date for the offers to purchase relating to the
remaining $230 million of trust preferred securities was extended most recently until May 20, 2010.
On April 22, 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp was advised that consents were received from the holders
of in excess of 66 2/3% of the most-senior classes of notes issued by Preferred Term Securities IX,
Inc. (PreTSL IX). The consents directed the trustee of PreTSL IX, The Bank of New York Mellon, to
accept the offer for $25.2 million aggregate principal amount of the Fixed/Floating Rate Capital
Securities of BBC Capital Statutory Trust X (the BBC X TruPS) held by PreTSL IX (the offer).
The Bank of New York Mellon advised BankAtlantic Bancorp that it will not accept the offer made to
PreTSL lX without receiving a greater percentage of consents. We disagree with The Bank of New York
Mellons interpretation and believe that the consents received exceeded the threshold required by
the indenture of PreTSL IX to authorize the trustee to accept the offer made to PreTSL lX. We filed
a lawsuit in the Circuit Court in Broward County, Florida seeking a declaratory judgment and order
from the Court directing The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, and without any liability to the
holders of any class of notes issued by PreTSL IX, to act on the direction received. Subsequent to
the filing of the lawsuit, certain holders of PreTSL IX withdrew their consents bringing the
percentage of consents received to below 66 2/3%. We are continuing to solicit consents in
accordance with the terms of the offers and will pursue the declaratory judgment action. The
offers to purchase are conditioned upon acceptance of the offers and upon BankAtlantic Bancorps
receipt of proceeds from a financing transaction in amounts sufficient to purchase the trust
preferred securities tendered. There is no assurance that we will succeed in the litigation, or be
in a position to consummate the offer made to PreTSL lX or any other offers in accordance with and
subject to the terms of the offers.
In March 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company contributed $8 million of capital to
BankAtlantic and during the year ended December 31, 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company
contributed $105 million of capital to BankAtlantic.
In February 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp filed a registration statement with the Securities and
Exchange Commission registering to offer, from time to time, up to $75 million of Class A common
stock, Preferred Stock, subscription rights, warrants or debt securities. A description of the
securities offered and the expected use of the net proceeds from any sales will be outlined in a
prospectus supplement if and when offered.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company is required to provide BankAtlantic with managerial
assistance and capital as the OTS may determine necessary under applicable regulations and
supervisory standards. Any such financing would be sought through public or private offerings, in
privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Additionally, we could pursue financings at
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company level or directly at BankAtlantic or both. Any financing
involving the issuance of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A common stock or securities
convertible or exercisable for BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A common stock could be highly
dilutive for its existing shareholders. There is no assurance that any such financing will be
available to us on favorable terms or at all.
91
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company has the following cash and investments that it believes
provide a source for potential liquidity based on values at March 31, 2010.
As of March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Value | Appreciation | Depreciation | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 5,135 | | | 5,135 | |||||||||||
Securities available for sale |
10 | | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Private investment securities |
1,500 | | | 1,500 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 6,645 | | 4 | 6,641 | |||||||||||
The loans transferred to the wholly-owned work-out subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp may also
provide a potential source of liquidity through workouts, repayments of the loans, sales of real
estate owned or sales of interests in the subsidiary. The balance of these loans and real estate
owned, net of reserves at March 31, 2010 was $40.8 million. During the three months ended March
31, 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company experienced net cash outflows of $0.2 million from
its work-out subsidiary. Additionally, in March 2010 BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company
foreclosed on a loan with a carrying value net of specific reserves of $3.3 million and sold the
property to an unrelated third party receiving cash proceeds in April 2010 of $5.2 million.
BankAtlantic Liquidity and Capital Resources
BankAtlantics primary sources of funds are deposits; principal repayments of loans, tax
certificates and securities available for sale; proceeds from the sale of loans and securities
available for sale; proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase; advances from
FHLB; Treasury and Federal Reserve lending programs; interest payments on loans and securities;
capital contributions from BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and other funds generated by
operations. These funds are primarily utilized to fund loan disbursements and purchases, deposit
outflows, repayments of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, repayments of advances
from FHLB and other borrowings, purchases of tax certificates and securities available for sale,
acquisitions of properties and equipment, and operating expenses. BankAtlantics liquidity will
depend on its ability to generate sufficient cash to support loan demand, to meet deposit
withdrawals, and to pay operating expenses. BankAtlantics securities portfolio provides an
internal source of liquidity through its short-term investments as well as scheduled maturities
and interest payments. Loan repayments and loan sales also provide an internal source of
liquidity. BankAtlantics liquidity is also dependent, in part, on its ability to maintain or
increase deposit levels and availability under lines of credit and Treasury and Federal Reserve
lending programs. BankAtlantics ability to increase or maintain deposits is impacted by
competition from other financial institutions and alternative investments as well as the current
low interest rate environment. Such competition or an increase in interest rates may require
BankAtlantic to offer higher interest rates to maintain or grow deposits, which may not be
successful in generating deposits, and which would increase its cost of funds or reduce its net
interest income. Additionally, BankAtlantics current lines of credit may not be available when
needed as these lines of credit are subject to periodic review and may be terminated or reduced at
the discretion of the issuing institutions or reduced based on availability of qualifying
collateral. BankAtlantics unused lines of credit declined from $760 million as of December 31,
2009 to $729 million as of March 31, 2010 due to reductions in available collateral resulting from
the sale of mortgage-backed securities and lower loan balances. Additionally, interest rate
changes, additional collateral requirements, disruptions in the capital markets or deterioration
in BankAtlantics financial condition may make borrowings unavailable or make terms of the
borrowings and deposits less favorable. As a result, there is a risk that our cost of funds will
increase or that borrowing capacity from funding sources may decrease.
The FDIC has announced that participating depository institutions may provide full deposit
insurance coverage for non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts and interest bearing
accounts with rates at or below fifty basis points, regardless of dollar amount. This new,
temporary guarantee was originally scheduled to expire at the end of 2009; however, in August 2009,
the FDIC extended the program until June 30, 2010, and in March 2010,
the FDIC again extended the program until December 31, 2010. BankAtlantic opted-in to the
additional coverage on the subject deposits. As a result, BankAtlantic is assessed a 15-basis point
surcharge for non-interest bearing deposit transaction account balances exceeding the previously
insured amount.
92
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The FHLB has granted BankAtlantic a line of credit capped at 30% of assets subject to
available collateral, with a maximum term of ten years. BankAtlantic utilized its FHLB line of
credit to borrow $152 million and to obtain a $252 million letter of credit securing public
deposits as of March 31, 2010. The line of credit is secured by a blanket lien on BankAtlantics
residential mortgage loans and certain commercial real estate and consumer home equity loans.
BankAtlantics unused available borrowings under this line of credit were approximately $644
million at March 31, 2010. An additional source of liquidity for BankAtlantic is its securities
portfolio. As of March 31, 2010, BankAtlantic had $73 million of unpledged securities that could
be sold or pledged for additional borrowings with the FHLB, the Federal Reserve or other financial
institutions. BankAtlantic is a participating institution in the Federal Reserve Treasury
Investment Program for up to $4 million in funding and at March 31, 2010, BankAtlantic had $2.6
million of short-term borrowings outstanding under this program. BankAtlantic is also eligible to
participate in the Federal Reserves discount window program. The amount that can be borrowed
under this program is dependent on available collateral, and BankAtlantic had unused available
borrowings of approximately $85 million as of March 31, 2010, with no amounts outstanding under
this program at March 31, 2010. The above lines of credit are subject to periodic review and may
be reduced or terminated at any time by the issuer institution. If BankAtlantics earnings and
credit quality continue to deteriorate and if the current economic trends continue to adversely
affect its performance, the above borrowings may be limited, additional collateral may be required
or these borrowings may not be available to us at all, in which case BankAtlantics liquidity would
be materially adversely affected.
BankAtlantic also has various relationships to acquire brokered deposits, and to execute
repurchase agreements, which may be utilized as an alternative source of liquidity. BankAtlantic
does not anticipate that its brokered deposit balances will increase significantly in the
foreseeable future. At March 31, 2010, BankAtlantic had $28.9 million and $24.7 million of brokered
deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase outstanding, representing 0.6% and 0.5%
of total assets, respectively. Additional repurchase agreement borrowings are subject to available
collateral. Additionally, BankAtlantic had total cash on hand or with other financial institutions
of $444.5 million as of March 31, 2010.
BankAtlantics liquidity may be affected by unforeseen demands on cash. Our objective in
managing liquidity is to maintain sufficient resources of available liquid assets to address our
funding needs. Multiple market disruptions have made it more difficult for financial institutions
to borrow money. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty how long these adverse market
conditions may continue, nor can we anticipate the degree that such market conditions may impact
our operations. Deterioration in the performance of other financial institutions may adversely
impact the ability of all financial institutions to access liquidity. There is no assurance that
further deterioration in the financial markets will not result in additional market-wide liquidity
problems, and affect our liquidity position. BankAtlantic has improved its liquidity position
during the three months ended March 31, 2010 by reducing assets, increasing deposits, and paying
down borrowings.
BankAtlantics commitments to originate loans were $28.8 million at March 31, 2010 compared
to $76.5 million at March 31, 2009. At March 31, 2010, total loan commitments represented
approximately 0.83% of net loans receivable. BankAtlantic had no commitments to purchase loans at
March 31, 2010 or March 31, 2009.
At March 31, 2010, BankAtlantic had mortgage-backed securities of approximately $29.7 million
pledged to secure securities sold under agreements to repurchase, $40.7 million pledged to secure
public deposits, and $3.5 million pledged to secure treasury tax and loan accounts and potential
borrowings at the Federal Reserve discount window.
93
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
At the indicated dates, BankAtlantics capital amounts and ratios were (dollars in
thousands):
Minimum Ratios | ||||||||||||||||
Adequately | Well | |||||||||||||||
Actual | Capitalized | Capitalized | ||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Ratio | Ratio | |||||||||||||
At March 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital |
$ | 412,440 | 12.86 | % | 8.00 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based
capital |
349,479 | 10.90 | 4.00 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||
Tangible capital |
349,479 | 7.51 | 1.50 | 1.50 | ||||||||||||
Core capital |
349,479 | 7.51 | 4.00 | 5.00 | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital |
$ | 422,724 | 12.56 | % | 8.00 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based
capital |
357,660 | 10.63 | 4.00 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||
Tangible capital |
357,660 | 7.58 | 1.50 | 1.50 | ||||||||||||
Core capital |
357,660 | 7.58 | 4.00 | 5.00 |
Savings institutions are also subject to the provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA). Regulations implementing the prompt corrective
action provisions of FDICIA define specific capital categories based on FDICIAs defined capital
ratios, as discussed more fully in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.
The OTS at its discretion can require an institution to maintain capital amounts and ratios
significantly above the well capitalized requirements based on the risk profile of the specific
institution. If higher capital requirements are imposed by the OTS, BankAtlantic could be required
to raise additional capital. There is no assurance that BankAtlantic or BankAtlantic Bancorp would
be successful in raising additional capital in subsequent periods and the inability to raise
capital, if required to do so, could have a material adverse impact on BankAtlantic Bancorps
business, results of operations and financial condition.
BankAtlantic works closely with its regulators during the course of its exams and on an
ongoing basis. Communications with our regulators include providing information on an ad-hoc,
one-time or regular basis related to areas of regulatory oversight and bank operations. As part of
such communications, BankAtlantic has provided to its regulators forecasts, strategic business
plans and other information relating to anticipated asset balances, asset quality, capital levels,
expenses, anticipated earnings, levels of brokered deposits and liquidity, and has indicated that
BankAtlantic has no current plans to pay dividends to BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company. The
information which BankAtlantic provides to its regulators is based on estimates and assumptions
made by management at the time provided, which are inherently uncertain and actual results may be
materially different than that estimated or projected.
Contractual Obligations and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements as of March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Payments Due by Period (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | After 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | 1 year | 1-3 years | 4-5 years | years | |||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
$ | 840,017 | 691,566 | 126,178 | 17,968 | 4,305 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
333,707 | | 22,000 | 17,512 | 294,195 | |||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB (1) |
152,008 | 152,008 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations held for
sublease |
25,108 | 842 | 3,210 | 2,164 | 18,892 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations held for use |
66,056 | 7,442 | 16,724 | 6,633 | 35,257 | |||||||||||||||
Pension obligation |
17,884 | 1,473 | 3,040 | 3,342 | 10,029 | |||||||||||||||
Other obligations |
13,006 | 206 | 4,800 | 6,400 | 1,600 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
$ | 1,447,786 | 853,537 | 175,952 | 54,019 | 364,278 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Payments due by period are based on contractual maturities |
|
(2) | The above table excludes interest payments on interest bearing liabilities |
94
Table of Contents
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management evaluated, with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer,
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2010 to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules
and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
95
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
Except as set forth below there have been no material changes in our legal proceedings from those
disclosed in the Legal Proceedings section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Investors Warranty of America, Inc. v. Core Communities of South Carolina, LLC and Core
Communities, LLC, et. al., Circuit Court, Jasper County, South Carolina
On April 7, 2010, Investors Warranty of America filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of Jasper
County, South Carolina to commence foreclosure proceedings related to property at Tradition Hilton
Head which served as collateral for a loan with a balance of approximately $27.2 million at March
31, 2010, made by the lender to Core and its subsidiary.
Investors Warranty of America, Inc. v. Core Communities, LLC and Horizons Acquisition 5, LLC,
Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for St. Lucie County, Florida
On April 8, 2010, Investors Warranty of America filed a complaint with the Circuit Court of the
Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for St. Lucie County, Florida to commence foreclosure
proceedings related to property at Tradition, Florida which served as collateral for a loan with a
balance of approximately $86.5 million at March 31, 2010, made by the lender to Core and its
subsidiary.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
There have been no material changes in the risks and uncertainties that we face from those
disclosed in the Risk Factors section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
Exhibit 31.1*
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 31.2*
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 31.3*
|
Chief Accounting Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 32.1**
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 32.2**
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 32.3**
|
Chief Accounting Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* | Exhibits filed with this Form 10-Q | |
** | Exhibits furnished with this Form 10-Q |
96
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BFC FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
||||
Date: May 21, 2010 | By: | /s/ Alan B. Levan | ||
Alan B. Levan, Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: May 21, 2010 | By: | /s/ John K. Grelle | ||
John K. Grelle, Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Date: May 21, 2010 | By: | /s/ Maria R. Scheker | ||
Maria R. Scheker, Chief Accounting Officer | ||||
97