Annual Statements Open main menu

Bluegreen Vacations Holding Corp - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)

e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2011
OR
     
o   Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File Number
001-09071
BFC Financial Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Florida   59-2022148
     
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
  (IRS Employer Identification Number)
     
2100 West Cypress Creek Road    
     
Fort Lauderdale, Florida   33309
     
(Address of Principal executive office)   (Zip Code)
(954) 940-4900
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)   Smaller reporting company þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of August 8, 2011 is as follows:
Class A Common Stock of $.01 par value, 68,521,497 shares outstanding as of August 8, 2011.
Class B Common Stock of $.01 par value, 6,859,751 shares outstanding as of August 8, 2011.
 
 

 


 

BFC Financial Corporation
TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    Page  
       
    3  
    3  
    4  
    6  
    7  
    8  
    10  
    60  
    110  
       
    111  
    113  
    113  
       
 EX-10.1
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-31.3
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2
 EX-32.3
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

2


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition — Unaudited
(In thousands, except share data)
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
ASSETS
               
Cash and due from other banks
  $ 185,489       178,868  
Interest bearing deposits in other banks
    318,437       455,538  
Restricted cash (including held by variable interest entities (“VIE”) of $38,813 in 2011 and $41,243 in 2010)
    61,351       62,249  
Securities available for sale, at fair value
    333,181       465,020  
Investment securities, at cost which approximate fair value
    333       2,033  
Tax certificates, net of allowance of $8,526 in 2011 and $8,811 in 2010
    66,211       89,789  
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock, at cost which approximates fair value
    31,614       43,557  
Loans held for sale
    49,425       29,765  
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $137,643 in 2011 and $162,139 in 2010
    2,659,237       3,009,721  
Notes receivable (including gross securitized notes of $486,138 in 2011 and $533,479 in 2010) net of allowance of $79,160 in 2011 and $93,398 in 2010
    543,174       574,969  
Accrued interest receivable
    17,973       22,010  
Inventory of real estate
    243,050       265,319  
Real estate owned
    79,704       74,488  
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
    13,344       12,455  
Properties and equipment, net
    206,160       213,089  
Goodwill
    12,241       12,241  
Intangible assets, net
    75,620       78,918  
Prepaid Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) deposit insurance assessment
    16,733       22,008  
Assets held for sale
    1,768       37,334  
Assets held for sale from discontinued operations
    31,750       83,754  
Other assets
    79,369       79,941  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 5,026,164       5,813,066  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
               
Liabilities:
               
Interest bearing deposits
  $ 2,540,102       2,758,032  
Non-interest bearing deposits
    883,474       792,012  
Deposits held for sale
          341,146  
 
           
Total deposits
    3,423,576       3,891,190  
Advances from FHLB
          170,000  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
          21,524  
Other short term borrowings
    1,020       1,240  
Receivable-backed notes payable, (including $412,780 held by VIE in 2011 and $459,030 in 2010)
    515,373       569,214  
Notes and mortgage notes payable and other borrowings
    181,441       239,571  
Junior subordinated debentures
    469,419       461,568  
Deferred income taxes, net
    16,342       28,663  
Deferred gain on debt settlement
    29,875       11,305  
Other liabilities
    177,807       186,634  
 
           
Total liabilities
    4,814,853       5,580,909  
 
           
Commitments and contingencies
               
Preferred stock of $.01 par value; authorized - 10,000,000 shares:
               
Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock — $.01 par value; authorized 15,000 shares issued and outstanding 15,000 shares with redemption value of $1,000 per share
    11,029       11,029  
 
           
 
               
Equity:
               
Class A common stock of $.01 par value, authorized 150,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 68,521,497 in 2011 and 2010
    685       685  
Class B common stock of $.01 par value, authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 6,859,751 in 2011 and 2010
    69       69  
Additional paid-in capital
    229,978       230,748  
Accumulated deficit
    (98,777 )     (88,853 )
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
    (5,064 )     223  
 
           
Total BFC Financial Corporation (“BFC”) shareholders’ equity
    126,891       142,872  
Noncontrolling interests
    73,391       78,256  
 
           
Total equity
    200,282       221,128  
 
           
Total liabilities and equity
  $ 5,026,164       5,813,066  
 
           
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


Table of Contents

BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations — Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
            (As Revised)             (As Revised)  
Revenues:
                               
Real Estate and Other
                               
Sales of VOIs and real estate
  $ 45,344       62,410       81,678       87,016  
Other resort revenue
    17,287       16,423       34,487       32,093  
Fee based sale commission and other revenues
    18,607       12,892       29,642       24,079  
Interest income
    21,974       23,679       44,407       47,893  
 
                       
 
    103,212       115,404       190,214       191,081  
 
                       
Financial Services
                               
Interest income
    37,569       43,648       77,633       91,735  
Service charges on deposits
    11,226       15,502       23,258       30,550  
Other service charges and fees
    6,886       7,739       14,077       15,117  
Securities activities, net
    (1,500 )     312       (1,524 )     3,450  
Gain on sale of Tampa branches
    38,656             38,656        
Other non-interest income
    3,208       2,491       6,735       5,017  
 
                       
 
    96,045       69,692       158,835       145,869  
 
                       
Total revenues
    199,257       185,096       349,049       336,950  
 
                       
 
                               
Costs and Expenses:
                               
Real Estate and Other
                               
Cost of sales of VOIs and real estate
    6,703       10,598       13,928       13,333  
Cost of sales of other resorts operations
    12,156       11,452       25,237       23,395  
Interest expense, net
    16,538       20,232       34,403       40,322  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    55,901       57,610       105,292       109,090  
 
                       
 
    91,298       99,892       178,860       186,140  
 
                       
Financial Services
                               
Interest expense
    8,127       9,951       16,654       21,795  
Provision for loan losses
    10,709       48,553       38,521       79,308  
Employee compensation and benefits
    19,731       25,155       39,021       50,533  
Occupancy and equipment
    11,488       13,745       24,073       27,327  
Advertising and promotion
    1,523       2,239       3,218       4,183  
Check losses
    663       521       962       953  
Professional fees
    1,295       4,824       4,654       7,711  
Supplies and postage
    955       921       1,857       1,919  
Telecommunication
    446       662       1,021       1,196  
Provision for tax certificates
    1,021       2,134       1,800       2,867  
Impairment of loans held for sale
    1,856             2,484        
Impairment of real estate owned
    6,507       1,221       8,830       1,364  
FDIC deposit insurance assessment
    2,181       2,430       5,486       4,789  
Other expenses
    5,776       8,409       9,336       13,429  
 
                       
 
    72,278       120,765       157,917       217,374  
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
    163,576       220,657       336,777       403,514  
 
                       
 
                               
(Loss) gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary
          (1,135 )     11,305       (1,135 )
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
    475       276       2,252       469  
Other income
    407       1,199       981       1,637  
 
                       
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
    36,563       (35,221 )     26,810       (65,593 )
Less: Provision for income taxes
    6,520       4,541       8,665       3,678  
 
                       
Income (loss) from continuing operations
    30,043       (39,762 )     18,145       (69,271 )
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
    (33,026 )     (1,035 )     (33,454 )     (4,626 )
 
                       
Net loss
    (2,983 )     (40,797 )     (15,309 )     (73,897 )
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
    3,955       (25,219 )     (5,760 )     (38,539 )
 
                       
Net loss attributable to BFC
    (6,938 )     (15,578 )     (9,549 )     (35,358 )
Preferred stock dividends
    (187 )     (187 )     (375 )     (375 )
 
                       
Net loss allocable to common stock
  $ (7,125 )     (15,765 )     (9,924 )     (35,733 )
 
                       
(CONTINUED)
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

4


Table of Contents

BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations — Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
            (As Revised)             (As Revised)  
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share Attributable to BFC (Note 17):
                               
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
                               
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
  $ 0.13       (0.22 )     0.10       (0.46 )
(Loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations
    (0.23 )     0.01       (0.23 )     (0.02 )
 
                       
Net loss per common share
  $ (0.10 )     (0.21 )     (0.13 )     (0.48 )
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
                               
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
  $ 0.13       (0.22 )     0.10       (0.46 )
(Loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations
    (0.23 )     0.01       (0.23 )     (0.02 )
 
                       
Net loss per common share
  $ (0.10 )     (0.21 )     (0.13 )     (0.48 )
 
                       
 
                               
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
    75,381       75,379       75,381       75,378  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding
    75,381       75,379       75,381       75,378  
 
                       
 
                               
Amounts attributable to BFC common shareholders:
                               
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  $ 10,049       (16,530 )     7,472       (34,511 )
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
    (17,174 )     765       (17,396 )     (1,222 )
 
                       
Net loss
  $ (7,125 )     (15,765 )     (9,924 )     (35,733 )
 
                       
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

5


Table of Contents

BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss — Unaudited
(In thousands)
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
            (As Revised)             (As Revised)  
Net loss
  $ (2,983 )     (40,797 )     (15,309 )     (73,897 )
 
                               
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
                               
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities available for sale, net of income tax provision (benefit) of $0 in 2011; $(70) and $899 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
    (4,053 )     1,706       (4,917 )     4,176  
Realized gains reclassified into net loss
                      (3,139 )
 
                       
Other comprehensive (loss) income
    (4,053 )     1,706       (4,917 )     1,037  
 
                       
 
                               
Comprehensive loss
    (7,036 )     (39,091 )     (20,226 )     (72,860 )
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
    4,738       (24,053 )     (5,390 )     (38,765 )
 
                       
Total comprehensive loss attributable to BFC
  $ (11,774 )     (15,038 )     (14,836 )     (34,095 )
 
                       
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

6


Table of Contents

BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity — Unaudited
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
(In thousands)
                                                                                 
                                                    Accumulated                    
                                                    Other                    
                                                    Compre-     Total     Non-        
    Shares of Common     Class A     Class B     Additional             hensive     BFC     controlling        
    Stock Outstanding     Common     Common     Paid-in     Accumulated     Income     Shareholders’     Interest in     Total  
    Class A     Class B     Stock     Stock     Capital     Deficit     (Loss)     Equity     Subsidiaries     Equity  
Balance, December 31, 2010
    68,521       6,860     $ 685     $ 69     $ 230,748     $ (88,853 )   $ 223     $ 142,872     $ 78,256     $ 221,128  
Net loss
                                  (9,549 )             (9,549 )     (5,760 )     (15,309 )
Other comprehensive income (loss)
                                        (5,287 )     (5,287 )     370       (4,917 )
Net effect of subsidiaries’ capital transactions attributable to BFC
                            (1,088 )                 (1,088 )           (1,088 )
Noncontrolling interest net effect of subsidiaries’ capital transactions
                                                    525       525  
Cash dividends on 5% Preferred Stock
                                  (375 )           (375 )           (375 )
Share-based compensation related to stock options
                            318                   318             318  
     
Balance, June 30, 2011
    68,521       6,860     $ 685     $ 69     $ 229,978     $ (98,777 )   $ (5,064 )   $ 126,891     $ 73,391     $ 200,282  
     
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

7


Table of Contents

BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Unaudited
(In thousands)
                 
    For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30,  
    2011     2010  
            (As Revised)  
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 110,997       176,257  
 
           
Investing activities:
               
Purchase of tax certificates
    (18,567 )     (93,142 )
Proceeds from redemption of tax certificates
    40,459       68,993  
Purchase of securities available for sale
    (9,932 )     (84,762 )
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale
    9,597       73,540  
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale
    126,679       64,943  
Purchase of interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
          (33,863 )
Proceeds from the maturities of interest bearing deposits
    25,283        
Decrease in restricted cash
    898       9,160  
Redemption of FHLB stock
    11,943        
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates
    139       85  
Net repayments of loans
    232,518       183,598  
Proceeds from the sales of loans transferred to held for sale
    27,793       26,871  
Improvements to real estate owned
          (800 )
Proceeds from sales of real estate owned
    10,197       12,362  
Proceeds from the sale of assets
          75,305  
Purchases of office property and equipment
    (3,676 )     (4,101 )
Proceeds from the sale of office property and equipment
    1,247       528  
Net cash outflow from sale of Tampa branches
    (257,221 )      
 
           
Net cash provided by investing activities
    197,357       298,717  
 
           
Financing activities:
               
Net (decrease) increase in deposits
    (144,400 )     35,662  
Net repayments from FHLB advances
    (170,020 )     (167,061 )
Net (decrease) increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    (21,524 )     256  
Decrease in short term borrowings
    (220 )     (732 )
Prepayment of bonds payable
          (661 )
Repayment of notes, mortgage notes and bonds payable
    (103,933 )     (178,600 )
Proceeds from notes, mortgage notes and bonds payable
    25,301       21,508  
Payments for debt issuance costs
    (1,090 )     (958 )
Preferred stock dividends paid
    (375 )     (375 )
Proceeds from issuance of subsidiaries’ common stock to non-BFC shareholders
    1,001       783  
Payments for the issuance costs of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A common stock
          (118 )
Proceeds from the exercise of BFC stock options
          2  
Non-controlling interest distributions
    (4,142 )     (338 )
 
           
Net cash used in financing activities
    (419,402 )     (290,632 )
 
           
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
    (111,048 )     184,342  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    588,846       316,080  
Cash and cash equivalents held for sale
    5,850        
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 483,648 (a)     500,422  
 
           
(CONTINUED)

8


Table of Contents

BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Unaudited
(In thousands)
                 
    For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30,  
    2011     2010  
            (As Revised)  
Supplemental cash flow information:
               
Interest paid on borrowings and deposits
  $ 39,024       50,691  
Net income taxes paid (refunds)
    1,324       (60,222 )
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
               
Loans and tax certificates transferred to real estate owned
    25,074       22,115  
Long-lived assets held-for-use transferred to assets held for sale
          1,919  
Long-lived assets held-for-sale transferred to assets held for use
          1,239  
Securities purchased pending settlement
          30,002  
(Decrease) increase in BFC’s accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes
    (5,287 )     1,263  
Net (decrease) increase in BFC shareholders’ equity from the effect of subsidiaries’ capital transactions, net of taxes
    (1,088 )     1,249  
Net decrease in equity resulting from cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
          (2,569 )
 
               
 
(a)   For purposes of the Statements of Cash Flows, the Company classifies interest bearing deposits in other banks with maturities of 90 days or less as cash equivalents. These amounted to $298.2 million at June 30, 2011.
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

9


Table of Contents

BFC Financial Corporation
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Presentation of Interim Financial Statements
          BFC Financial Corporation (“BFC” or, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company”) is a diversified holding company whose principal holdings include a controlling interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including BankAtlantic (“BankAtlantic Bancorp”), a controlling interest in Bluegreen Corporation and its subsidiaries (“Bluegreen”), and a non-controlling interest in Benihana Inc. (“Benihana”). BFC also holds interests in other investments and subsidiaries, as described herein. As a result of its position as the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC is a “unitary savings bank holding company” and was historically examined and regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”). However, effective July 21, 2011, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the OTS’ supervisory authority is now held by, and BFC is subject to the supervision of, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”).
          Generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) require that BFC consolidate the financial results of the entities in which it has controlling interest. As a consequence, the assets and liabilities of all such entities are presented on a consolidated basis in BFC’s financial statements. However, except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of the consolidated entities, including BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen and Woodbridge Holdings, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC (“Woodbridge”), are not direct obligations of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC absent a dividend or distribution from those entities. The recognition by BFC of income from controlled entities is determined based on the total percent of economic ownership in those entities. At June 30, 2011, we had an approximately 52% ownership and voting interest in Bluegreen and an approximately 53% ownership interest and 75% voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp.
          Our business activities currently consist of (i) Real Estate and Other and (ii) Financial Services. Since our acquisition of a controlling interest in Bluegreen during November 2009, we have reported the results of our business activities through six segments. Four of the segments relate to our Real Estate and Other business activities. These segments are: BFC Activities; Real Estate Operations; and Bluegreen Resorts and Bluegreen Communities, the two segments through which Bluegreen’s business was historically conducted. Our other two segments — BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company — relate to our Financial Services business activities and include BankAtlantic Bancorp’s results of operations.
          On March 24, 2011, Bluegreen announced that it had engaged advisors to explore strategic alternatives for Bluegreen Communities. In connection with that process, Bluegreen’s Board of Directors made a determination during June 2011 to seek to sell Bluegreen Communities or all or substantially all of its assets. As a consequence, it was determined that Bluegreen Communities met the criteria for classification as a discontinued operation. Bluegreen recently entered into a non-binding letter of intent with a third party contemplating the sale of Bluegreen Communities, or a similar transaction. However, as of the date of this filing, Bluegreen had not entered into any definitive agreement or agreements with respect to the sale of Bluegreen Communities or its assets, and Bluegreen may not be successful in its efforts to consummate any such sale or sales. See Note 4 for further information regarding the classification of Bluegreen Communities as a discontinued operation and the results of discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and Note 14 for additional information about our operating segments.
          The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In management’s opinion, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, as are necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s consolidated financial condition at June 30, 2011; the consolidated results of operations and comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; and the changes in consolidated equity for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and these notes are presented as permitted by Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. All significant inter-company balances and

10


Table of Contents

transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. As used throughout this document, the term “fair value” reflects the Company’s estimate of fair value as discussed herein. Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.
          As described above, the operating results of Bluegreen Communities, which had previously been presented as a separate reporting segment, are included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the majority of the assets related to Bluegreen Communities are presented separately on the consolidated statement of financial condition as “assets held for sale from discontinued operations.” See Note 4 for further information.
          Revisions to Consolidated Financial Statements
          On November 16, 2009, we purchased an additional 7.4 million shares of Bluegreen’s common stock. This share purchase increased our ownership interest in Bluegreen to approximately 16.9 million shares, or approximately 52%, of Bluegreen’s outstanding common stock. Accordingly, we are deemed to have a controlling interest in Bluegreen and, under GAAP, Bluegreen’s results are consolidated in our financial statements. The Company accounted for the acquisition of a controlling interest in Bluegreen in accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations, pursuant to which we were required to evaluate the fair value of Bluegreen’s assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date. As previously disclosed, the allocation of the purchase price was based on preliminary estimates of the fair value of Bluegreen’s inventory and contracts, and was subject to change within the measurement period as valuations were finalized. Additionally, any offset relating to amortization/accretion was also retrospectively adjusted in the appropriate periods. As discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, during the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company finalized its valuations and adjusted the preliminary values assigned to the assets and liabilities of Bluegreen in order to reflect additional information obtained since the November 16, 2009 share acquisition date. These changes resulted in the following adjustments at December 31, 2009: a decrease in real estate inventory of approximately $6.9 million; an increase in other assets of approximately $3.5 million; an increase in other liabilities of approximately $4.1 million; and a decrease in deferred income taxes of approximately $7.1 million. Such adjustments resulted in a decrease to the “bargain purchase gain” related to the share acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $183.1 million to $182.8 million. The Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were revised to reflect the impact of the amortization/accretion associated with the above adjustments which resulted in a decrease to the net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 of approximately $188,000 and $276,000, respectively, compared to the previously reported amounts.
          Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2010, management identified certain errors in its previously reported financial statements for 2010 and 2009. Because these errors were not material to the Company’s financial statements for 2010 or 2009, individually or in the aggregate, the Company revised its previously reported 2010 first, second and third quarter financial statements and its 2009 annual financial statements. These adjustments related to the following: the recognition of interest income associated with the notes receivable which for accounting purposes are treated as having been acquired by BFC in accordance with the accounting guidance Loans and Debt Securities with Deteriorated Credit Quality; an adjustment to the provision for loan losses for these notes receivable; interest expense recognition for notes payable of certain defaulted debt at Woodbridge’s subsidiaries, Core Communities, LLC (“Core” or “Core Communities”) and Carolina Oak Homes, LLC (“Carolina Oak”), at the defaulted interest rate, where the stated interest rate was previously used; the recognition of income tax benefits associated with unrealized gains in accumulated other comprehensive income; and an adjustment to deferred taxes related to an impairment to real estate inventory which was reflected after November 16, 2009 and accounted for as a temporary difference, which should have been included in the determination of deferred taxes at the acquisition date, as part of the Bluegreen purchase price allocation.
          The Company’s financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 contained herein reflect the adjustments and revisions described above. The Company will present the impact of these adjustments and revisions for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2011 , in which they will be disclosed as comparable periods. The quarterly period adjustments and revisions were previously disclosed in Note 40 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. With respect to the adjustments and revisions for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company disclosed the impact of these adjustments in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

11


Table of Contents

          The following table summarizes the quarterly results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 as it was previously reported and as revised (in thousands):
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2010     June 30, 2010  
            (As Previously             (As Previously  
    (As Revised)     Reported)     (As Revised)     Reported)  
Revenues (1)
  $ 185,096       183,252       336,950       335,243  
Costs and expenses (2)
    220,657       229,109       403,514       421,889  
     
 
    (35,561 )     (45,857 )     (66,564 )     (86,646 )
Loss on settlement of investment in subsidiary
    (1,135 )     (1,135 )     (1,135 )     (1,135 )
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
    276       276       469       469  
Other income
    1,199       1,199       1,637       1,953  
     
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
    (35,221 )     (45,517 )     (65,593 )     (85,359 )
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes (3)
    4,541       392       3,678       (4,199 )
     
Loss from continuing operations
    (39,762 )     (45,909 )     (69,271 )     (81,160 )
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income tax
    (1,035 )     2,714       (4,626 )     2,465  
     
Net loss
    (40,797 )     (43,195 )     (73,897 )     (78,695 )
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (4)
    (25,219 )     (27,015 )     (38,539 )     (41,680 )
     
Net loss attributable to BFC
    (15,578 )     (16,180 )     (35,358 )     (37,015 )
Preferred Stock dividends
    (187 )     (187 )     (375 )     (375 )
     
Net loss allocable to common stock
  $ (15,765 )     (16,367 )     (35,733 )     (37,390 )
     
Basic (Loss) Earnings per Common Share
                               
Loss per share from continuing operations
  $ (0.22 )     (0.26 )     (0.46 )     (0.53 )
Earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
    0.01       0.04       (0.02 )     0.03  
Net loss per common share
  $ (0.21 )     (0.22 )     (0.48 )     (0.50 )
Diluted (Loss) Earnings per Common Share
                               
Loss per share from continuing operations
  $ (0.22 )     (0.26 )     (0.46 )     (0.53 )
Earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
    0.01       0.04       (0.02 )     0.03  
Net loss per common share
  $ (0.21 )     (0.22 )     (0.48 )     (0.50 )
 
1)   Includes revisions for Bluegreen’s notes receivable which for accounting purposes are treated as having been acquired by us. These revisions related to the provision for loan losses and recognition of interest income in accordance with the accounting guidance for Loans and Debt Securities with Deteriorated Credit Quality. The revisions increased revenues by approximately $5.8 million and $10.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
 
2)   Includes certain revisions related to the interest rates used in the calculation of interest expense on defaulted notes payable at Core Communities and Carolina Oak and revisions related to the subsequent amortization of adjustments of real estate inventory and certain contracts in connection with the Bluegreen share purchase from the measurement period. These revisions resulted in an increase to costs and expenses of $0.6 million and $2.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
 
3)   Includes tax adjustments as they relate to the revisions noted above and the recognition of income tax benefits associated with unrealized gains in accumulated other comprehensive income at BankAtlantic Bancorp and BFC, which resulted in a net decrease of $2.5 million and $3.2 million in the tax benefit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
 
4)   As a result of the revisions noted above, the net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased by $1.8 million and $3.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.

12


Table of Contents

          The principal amount of loans in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s residential loan portfolios set forth in the table in Note 10 to the Company’s financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 were incorrectly identified as reflecting loan-to-value ratios obtained as of the first quarter of 2010 when in fact the amounts instead reflected loan-to-value ratios as of the date of loan origination. The table below labeled “As Corrected” reflects loan-to-value ratios of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s residential loans as of December 31, 2010 based on valuations obtained during the first quarter of 2010. The table below labeled “As Reported” reflects the table contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 which reflects loan-to-value ratios of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s residential loans as of the date of loan origination.
                                 
    As Reported     As Corrected  
    As of December 31, 2010     As of December 31, 2010  
(in thousands)   Residential     Residential     Residential     Residential  
Loan-to-value ratios   Interest Only     Amortizing     Interest Only     Amortizing  
Ratios not available
  $       78,031       59,520       185,610  
=<60%
    107,063       144,744       47,605       145,075  
60.1% - 70%
    118,679       103,891       33,005       49,732  
70.1% - 80%
    290,840       309,925       37,808       48,586  
80.1% - 90%
    17,055       23,982       47,574       47,039  
>90.1%
    16,609       13,212       324,734       197,743  
 
                       
Total
  $ 550,246       673,785       550,246       673,785  
 
                       
2. Regulatory and Liquidity Considerations
BFC
          Regulatory Considerations
          As described above, BFC, due to its position as the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, is a “unitary savings bank holding company” and, as such, was historically examined and regulated by the OTS. Effective July 21, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, assumed the supervisory authority previously held by the OTS.
          BFC, on a parent company only basis, had previously committed that it would not, without the prior written non-objection of the OTS, (i) incur, issue, renew or roll over any current lines of credit, guarantee the debt of any other entity or otherwise incur any additional debt, except as contemplated by BFC’s business plan or in connection with BankAtlantic’s compliance requirements applicable to it; (ii) declare or make any dividends or other capital distributions other than dividends payable on BFC’s currently outstanding preferred stock of approximately $187,500 a quarter or (iii) enter into any new agreements, contracts or arrangements or materially modify any existing agreements, contracts or arrangements with BankAtlantic not consistent with past practices. On June 30, 2011, the OTS advised BFC that it was not permitted to (i) incur or issue any additional debt or debt securities, increase lines of credit or guarantee the debt of any other entity, or (ii) make dividend payments on its preferred stock, in each case without the prior written non-objection of the OTS. On July 21, 2011, BFC made a formal request to the Federal Reserve Board, which, as described above, now has the supervisory authority previously held by the OTS, for non-objection to the payment of the dividend on its outstanding preferred stock.
          As described below, BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic each entered into Cease and Desist Orders with the OTS during February 2011. (See “BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic — Regulatory Considerations” below for a discussion regarding the terms of the Cease and Desist Orders.) Based on its ownership interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC may in the future be required to enter into a Cease and Desist Order with the Federal Reserve Board addressing its ownership and oversight of those companies.
          Liquidity Considerations
          Except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen and Woodbridge are not direct obligations of BFC and generally are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC, absent a dividend or distribution from those entities. BFC’s principal sources of liquidity are its available cash, including tax refunds received as a result of tax law changes, short-term investments, and dividends from Benihana on our holdings of its convertible preferred stock. In addition, dividends we receive from Benihana in the future will be less than historical amounts due to our conversion of an aggregate of 300,000 shares out of a total of 800,000 shares of Benihana’s convertible preferred stock during May and July 2011. However, the

13


Table of Contents

holders of our preferred stock may have the right to receive such dividends from Benihana in our place if the Federal Reserve Board does not consent to our payment of dividends on our preferred stock or we otherwise fail to satisfy such obligation. W also expect to receive an additional $7.5 million tax refund, net of amounts payable under the settlement agreement related to the bankruptcy filing of Levitt and Sons LLC and substantially all of its subsidiaries, as discussed in Note 15 below.
          We intend to use our available funds to fund operations and meet our obligations. We may also use available funds to make additional investments in the companies within our consolidated group, invest in equity securities and other investments, or repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program. On September 21, 2009, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program which authorizes the repurchase of up to 20,000,000 shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock at an aggregate cost of no more than $10 million. The share repurchase program replaced our $10 million repurchase program that our Board of Directors approved in October 2006 which placed a limitation on the number of shares which could be repurchased under the program at 1,750,000 shares of Class A Common Stock. The current program, like the prior program, authorizes management, at its discretion, to repurchase shares from time to time subject to market conditions and other factors. No shares were repurchased during the years ended December 31, 2010 or 2009, or during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
          During June 2011, BFC acquired an aggregate of 13.3 million shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock in connection with the exercise of subscriptions rights granted to it in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s rights offering that commenced on May 16, 2011 and expired on June 16, 2011. The aggregate purchase price for the 13.3 million shares purchased was $10.0 million. During June and July 2010, BFC acquired an aggregate of 10.0 million shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock in connection with the exercise of subscription rights granted to it in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s rights offering that commenced on June 14, 2010 and expired on July 20, 2010. The aggregate purchase price for the 10.0 million shares purchased at that time was $15.0 million. See Note 3 for additional information.
          Since March 2009, BFC has not received cash dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic Bancorp is currently prohibited from paying dividends on its common stock without first receiving the written non-objection of the Federal Reserve Board. In addition, during February 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp elected to exercise its right to defer payments of interest on its trust preferred junior subordinated debt. BankAtlantic Bancorp is permitted to defer quarterly interest payments for up to 20 consecutive quarters. During the deferral period, BankAtlantic Bancorp is prohibited from paying dividends to its shareholders, including BFC. While BankAtlantic Bancorp can end the deferral period at any time, BankAtlantic Bancorp has indicated that it anticipates that it may continue to defer such interest payments for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, BFC has not received cash dividends from Bluegreen and does not expect to receive cash dividends from Bluegreen in the foreseeable future. Certain of Bluegreen’s credit facilities contain terms which may limit the payment of cash dividends, and Bluegreen may only pay dividends as declared by its Board of Directors, a majority of whom are independent directors under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.
          We believe that our current financial condition and credit relationships, together with anticipated cash flows from other sources of funds, including tax refunds and, if determined to be advisable, proceeds from the disposition of certain properties or investments, will allow us to meet our anticipated near-term liquidity needs at least through June 30, 2012. With respect to long-term liquidity requirements, we may also, subject to the receipt of any regulatory approvals or non-objection, seek to raise funds through the incurrence of long-term secured or unsecured indebtedness, the issuance of equity and/or debt securities or through the sale of assets; however these alternatives may not be available to us on attractive terms, or at all.
Woodbridge
          The development activities at Carolina Oak, which is within Tradition Hilton Head, were suspended in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of, among other things, an overall softening of demand for new homes and a decline in the overall economy. In 2009, the housing industry continued to face significant challenges and Woodbridge made the decision to cease all activities at Carolina Oak. Woodbridge was the obligor under a $37.2 million loan that was collateralized by the Carolina Oak property. During November 2009, the lender filed an action against Woodbridge and Carolina Oak alleging default under a promissory note and breach of a guaranty related to the loan. During December 2009, the OTS closed the lender and appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) as receiver. The FDIC subsequently sold the loan to an investor group (sometimes referred to herein as the “note holder”). Effective April 26, 2011, Woodbridge and Carolina Oak entered into a settlement agreement with the note holder to resolve the disputes and litigation between them. Under the terms of

14


Table of Contents

the settlement agreement, (i) Woodbridge paid $2.5 million to the note holder, (ii) Carolina Oak conveyed to the note holder the real property securing the loan and (iii) the note holder agreed not to pursue certain remedies, including a deficiency judgment, and after the expiration of an agreed-upon time, to fully release Woodbridge and Carolina Oak, in each case subject to certain conditions. On April 26, 2011, the carrying amount of Carolina Oak’s inventory was approximately $10.8 million. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company recorded a deferred gain on debt settlement of $29.9 million in its Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2011. The deferred gain will be recognized into income at the earlier of the conclusion of a foreclosure proceeding or April 25, 2012.
          On September 21, 2009, BFC consummated its merger with Woodbridge pursuant to which Woodbridge merged with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC. Under Florida law, holders of Woodbridge’s Class A Common Stock who did not vote to approve the merger with Woodbridge and who properly asserted and exercised their appraisal rights with respect to their shares (“Dissenting Holders”) are entitled to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to the fair value of their shares (as determined in accordance with the provisions of Florida law) in lieu of the shares of BFC’s Class A Common Stock which they would otherwise have been entitled to receive. Dissenting Holders, who owned in the aggregate approximately 4.6 million shares of Woodbridge’s Class A Common Stock, provided written notice to Woodbridge regarding their intent to exercise their appraisal rights. In accordance with Florida law, Woodbridge provided written notices and required forms to the Dissenting Holders setting forth, among other things, its determination that the fair value of Woodbridge’s Class A Common Stock immediately prior to the effectiveness of the merger was $1.10 per share. Dissenting Holders were required to return their appraisal forms by November 10, 2009 and indicate on their appraisal forms whether the Dissenting Holder chose to (i) accept Woodbridge’s offer of $1.10 per share or (ii) demand payment of the fair value estimate determined by the Dissenting Holder plus interest. One Dissenting Holder, which held approximately 400,000 shares of Woodbridge’s Class A Common Stock, withdrew its shares from the appraisal rights process, while the remaining Dissenting Holders, who collectively held approximately 4.2 million shares of Woodbridge’s Class A Common Stock, have rejected Woodbridge’s offer of $1.10 per share and requested payment for their shares based on their respective fair value estimates of Woodbridge’s Class A Common Stock. In December 2009, the Company recorded a $4.6 million liability with a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in capital representing, in the aggregate, Woodbridge’s offer to the Dissenting Holders. Thereafter, the appraisal rights litigation commenced and it is currently ongoing. The outcome of the litigation is uncertain and there is no assurance as to the amount of cash that will be required to be paid to the Dissenting Holders, which amount may be greater than the $4.6 million that we have accrued.
Core Communities
          Historically, the activities of Core Communities focused on the development of a master-planned community in Port St. Lucie, Florida called Tradition, Florida and a community outside of Hardeeville, South Carolina called Tradition Hilton Head. Until 2009, Tradition, Florida was in active development as was Tradition Hilton Head, although in a much earlier stage.
          During 2010, demand for residential and commercial inventory showed no signs of recovery, particularly in the geographic regions where Core’s properties were located. In early 2010, Woodbridge made the decision to pursue an orderly liquidation of Core and worked cooperatively with its various lenders to achieve that objective. During November 2010, Core entered into a settlement agreement with one of its lenders, which had previously commenced actions seeking foreclosure of mortgage loans totaling approximately $113.9 million collateralized by property in Florida and South Carolina. Under the terms of the agreement, Core pledged additional collateral to the lender consisting of membership interests in five of Core’s subsidiaries and granted security interests in the acreage owned by such subsidiaries in Port St. Lucie, Florida, substantially all of which was undeveloped raw land. Core also agreed to an amendment of the complaint related to the Florida foreclosure action to include this additional collateral and entered into consensual judgments of foreclosure in both the Florida and South Carolina foreclosure actions. In consideration therefor, the lender agreed not to enforce a deficiency judgment against Core and, in February 2011, released Core from any other claims arising from or relating to the loans. As of November 30, 2010, Core deconsolidated the five subsidiaries, the membership interests in which were transferred to the lender upon entry of the consensual judgments of foreclosure. In accordance with the accounting guidance for consolidation, the Company recorded a guarantee obligation “deferred gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary” of $11.3 million in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2010. Core received its general release of liability, and accordingly the deferred gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary was recognized into income during the first quarter of 2011. Approximately $27.2 million of the $113.9 million of mortgage loans described above is collateralized by property in South Carolina which had an estimated carrying

15


Table of Contents

value of approximately $19.4 million at June 30, 2011. This property is subject to separate foreclosure proceedings which are expected to occur during the fourth quarter of 2011. While Core was released by the lender from any other claims relating to the loans, the applicable accounting guidance requires that the $27.2 million of debt and associated $19.4 million of collateral remain in Core’s financial statements until the foreclosure proceedings have been completed.
          In December 2010, Core and one of its subsidiaries entered into agreements, including a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreement, with one of their lenders which resolved the foreclosure proceedings relating to property at Tradition Hilton Head which served as collateral for a $25 million loan. Pursuant to the agreements, Core’s subsidiary transferred to the lender all of its rights to the property which served as collateral for the loan as well as certain additional real and personal property. The lender in turn released Core and its subsidiary from any claims arising from or relating to the loan. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, this transaction was accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring and, accordingly, a $13.0 million gain on debt extinguishment was recognized in December 2010.
BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic
Regulatory Considerations
          The Parent Company of BankAtlantic Bancorp (“BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company”) and BankAtlantic were historically regulated and subject to regular examination by the OTS. Since July 21, 2011, the regulatory oversight of BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company is by the Federal Reserve and the regulatory oversight of BankAtlantic is by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) as a result of the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act.
          On February 23, 2011, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and BankAtlantic each entered into a Stipulation and Consent to Issuance of Order to Cease and Desist with the OTS. The Order to Cease and Desist to which BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company is subject is referred to as the “Company Order,” the Order to Cease and Desist to which BankAtlantic is subject is referred to as the “Bank Order” and the Company Order and Bank Order are referred to collectively as the “Orders.” The OTS issued the Orders due to BankAtlantic Bancorp’s losses over the past three years, high levels of classified assets and inadequate levels of capital based on BankAtlantic’s risk profile as determined by the OTS. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company submitted updated written plans to the OTS that addressed, among other things, maintenance and enhancement of BankAtlantic’s capital and its business plan for the year ending December 31, 2011. In addition, under the terms of the Company Order, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company was prohibited from taking certain actions without receiving the prior written non-objection of the Federal Reserve, including, without limitation, declaring or paying any dividends or other capital distributions and incurring certain indebtedness. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company is also required to ensure BankAtlantic’s compliance with the terms of the Bank Order as well as all applicable laws, rules, regulations and agency guidance.
          Pursuant to the terms of the Bank Order, BankAtlantic was required to maintain a tier 1 (core) capital ratio equal to or greater than 8% and a total risk-based capital ratio equal to or greater than 14%. At June 30, 2011, BankAtlantic had a tier 1 (core) capital ratio of 8.24% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 14.52%. Pursuant to the terms of the Bank Order, BankAtlantic has revised certain of its plans, programs and policies and submitted to the OTS certain written plans, including a capital plan, a revised business plan and a plan to reduce BankAtlantic’s delinquent loans and non-performing assets. If BankAtlantic fails to comply with the capital plan and/or fails to maintain the increased capital ratio requirements, or upon any written request from the OCC, BankAtlantic is required to submit a contingency plan, which details actions which BankAtlantic would, in its case, take to either merge with or be acquired by another banking institution. BankAtlantic will not be required to implement such contingency plan until such time as it receives written notification from the OCC to do so. In addition, the Bank Order requires BankAtlantic to limit its asset growth and restricts BankAtlantic from originating or purchasing new commercial real estate loans or entering into certain material agreements, in each case without receiving the prior written non-objection of the OCC. Separately, the OTS has confirmed that it has no objection to BankAtlantic originating loans to facilitate the sale of certain assets or the renewal, extension or modification of existing commercial real estate loans, subject in each case to compliance with applicable regulations and bank policies. The Bank Order prohibits the payment of dividends and other distributions without the prior written non-objection of the OCC. The Orders also include certain restrictions on compensation paid to the senior executive officers of BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and BankAtlantic, and restrictions on agreements with affiliates.

16


Table of Contents

          BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and BankAtlantic will seek to maintain the higher capital requirements of the Bank Order through efforts that may include the issuance of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock through a public or private offering or through initiatives to maintain or improve its regulatory capital position including: operating strategies to increase revenues and to reduce non-interest expenses, and reduction of asset balances and non-performing loans. There can be no assurance that BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company or BankAtlantic will be able to execute these or other strategies in order to maintain BankAtlantic’s new minimum regulatory capital levels by the required time frames.
          Each Order became effective on February 23, 2011 and will remain in effect until terminated, modified or suspended by the OCC, as it relates to the Bank Order, or the Federal Reserve, as it relates to the Company Order. No fines or penalties were imposed in connection with either Order. While the Orders formalize steps that BankAtlantic Bancorp believes are already underway, if there is any material failure by BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company or BankAtlantic to comply with the terms of the Orders, or if unanticipated market factors emerge, and/or if BankAtlantic Bancorp is unable to successfully execute its plans, or comply with other regulatory requirements, then the regulators could take further action, which could include the imposition of fines and/or additional enforcement actions. Enforcement actions broadly available to regulators include the issuance of a capital directive, removal of officers and/or directors, institution of proceedings for receivership or conservatorship, and termination of deposit insurance. Any such action would have a material adverse effect on BankAtlantic Bancorp’s business, results of operations and financial position.
          Liquidity Considerations
          Both BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and BankAtlantic actively manage liquidity and cash flow needs. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company had cash of $3.8 million as of June 30, 2011. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company does not have debt maturing until March 2032 and has the ability to defer interest payments on its junior subordinated debentures until December 2013; however, based on current interest rates, accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $73.9 million would be due in December 2013 if interest is deferred until that date. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company’s operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $6.4 million and were $3.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011. BankAtlantic’s liquidity is dependent, in part, on its ability to maintain or increase deposit levels and the availability of its lines of credit borrowings with the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), as well as the Treasury and Federal Reserve lending programs.
          As of June 30, 2011, BankAtlantic had $431 million of cash and short-term investments and approximately $832 million of available unused borrowings, consisting of $541 million of unused FHLB line of credit capacity, $257 million of unpledged securities, and $34 million of available borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve. However, such available borrowings are subject to regular reviews and may be terminated, suspended or reduced at any time at the discretion of the issuing institution or based on the availability of qualifying collateral. Additionally, interest rate changes, additional collateral requirements, disruptions in the capital markets, adverse litigation or regulatory actions, or deterioration in BankAtlantic’s financial condition may reduce the amounts it is able to borrow, make borrowings unavailable or make terms of the borrowings and deposits less favorable. As a result, BankAtlantic’s cost of funds could increase and the availability of funding sources could decrease. Based on current and expected liquidity needs and sources, BankAtlantic Bancorp expects to be able to meet its obligations at least through June 30, 2012.
3. Acquisitions and Dispositions
Bluegreen Share Acquisition
          As described above, on November 16, 2009, we purchased approximately 7.4 million shares of the common stock of Bluegreen for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $23 million, increasing our interest from 9.5 million shares, or 29%, of Bluegreen’s common stock to 16.9 million shares, or 52%, of Bluegreen’s common stock. As a result, we hold a controlling interest in Bluegreen and, under GAAP, consolidate Bluegreen and all of Bluegreen’s consolidated entities into our financial statements. See Revisions to Consolidated Financial Statements under Note 1 above for a discussion regarding adjustments made to our previously reported financial statements resulting from our finalization during the fourth quarter of 2010 of our valuation of Bluegreen’s assets and liabilities as of the November 16, 2009 share acquisition date.

17


Table of Contents

Purchases of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock
          On June 18, 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp commenced a rights offering to its shareholders of record as of the close of business on June 14, 2010 (the “2010 Rights Offering”). In the 2010 Rights Offering, BankAtlantic Bancorp distributed to each eligible shareholder 0.327 subscription rights for each share of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock owned as of the close of business on June 14, 2010. Each subscription right entitled the holder thereof to purchase one share of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock at the purchase price of $1.50 per share. Shareholders who exercised their basic subscription rights in full were also given the opportunity to request to purchase any additional shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock that remained unsubscribed for at the expiration of the 2010 Rights Offering at the same $1.50 per share purchase price. The 2010 Rights Offering expired on July 20, 2010. During June 2010, BFC exercised its basic subscription rights in full, thereby purchasing 5,986,865 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock, and requested to purchase an additional 4,013,135 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock to the extent available at the expiration of the 2010 Rights Offering. In connection with the exercise of its subscription rights, BFC delivered to BankAtlantic Bancorp $15.0 million in cash, which represented the full purchase price for all of the shares subscribed for by BFC. In exchange, BFC was issued 4,697,184 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock on June 28, 2010, which represented a portion of its basic subscription rights exercise. The balance of BFC’s subscription was treated as an advance to BankAtlantic Bancorp, as evidenced by a related $8.0 million promissory note executed by BankAtlantic Bancorp in favor of BFC. The promissory note had a scheduled maturity of July 30, 2010 and was payable in cash or shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock issuable to BFC in connection with its exercise of subscription rights in the 2010 Rights Offering. The promissory note was eliminated in consolidation as of June 30, 2010. In July 2010, in connection with the completion of the 2010 Rights Offering, the promissory note was satisfied in accordance with its terms through the issuance to BFC of the additional 5,302,816 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock subscribed for by BFC. The 2010 Rights Offering increased BFC’s ownership interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 8% to 45% and BFC’s voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 5% to 71%.
          During the second quarter of 2011, BankAtlantic Bancorp distributed to its shareholders of record as of the close of business on May 12, 2011, 0.624 subscription rights for each share of such stock owned on that date (the “2011 Rights Offering”). Each subscription right entitled the holder thereof to purchase one share of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock at a purchase price of $0.75 per share. Shareholders who exercised their basic subscription rights in full were also given the opportunity to request to purchase, at the same $0.75 per share purchase price, additional shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock that were not purchased by other shareholders through the exercise of the basic subscription rights granted to them. The 2011 Rights Offering expired on June 16, 2011. BFC participated in the 2011 Rights Offering, acquiring an aggregate of 13,333,333 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $10 million. This increased BFC’s ownership interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 8% to 53% and BFC’s voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 5% to 75%.
          BFC’s acquisition of shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock in the 2010 and 2011 Rights Offerings were each accounted for as an equity transaction in accordance with applicable accounting guidance which provides that changes in a parent’s ownership interest which do not result in the parent losing its controlling interest are reported as equity transactions.
Sale of Tampa Branches and Related Facilities by BankAtlantic
          In August 2010, BankAtlantic announced that, due to the rapidly changing environment in Florida and the banking industry, it decided to focus on its core markets in South Florida and BankAtlantic began seeking a buyer for its 19 branches located in the Tampa, Florida area. In January 2011, BankAtlantic agreed to sell its 19 branches and 2 related facilities in the Tampa area and the associated deposits to an unrelated financial institution and on June 3, 2011, BankAtlantic completed the Tampa sale. The purchasing financial institution paid i) a 10% premium for the deposits plus ii) the net book value of the acquired real estate and substantially all of the fixed assets associated with the branches and facilities.

18


Table of Contents

          The following summarizes the assets sold, liabilities transferred and cash outflows associated with the branches and facilities sold (in thousands):
         
    Amount  
Assets Sold:
       
Property and equipment
  $ 28,626  
 
     
Total assets sold
    28,626  
 
     
Liabilities Transferred:
       
Deposits
    324,320  
Other liabilities
    183  
 
     
Total liabilities transferred
    324,503  
 
     
Net liabilities transferred
    (295,877 )
Gain on sale of Tampa branches, net of transaction costs of $1,959
    38,656  
 
     
Net cash outflows from sale of branches
  $ (257,221 )
 
     
          The assets and liabilities associated with the Tampa branches as of December 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
         
ASSETS
       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 5,850  
Office properties and equipment
    31,484  
 
     
Total assets held for sale
  $ 37,334  
 
     
LIABILITIES
       
Interest bearing deposits
  $ 255,630  
Non-interest bearing deposits
    85,516  
 
     
Total deposits
    341,146  
Accrued interest payable
    87  
 
     
Total liabilities held for sale
  $ 341,233  
 
     
4. Discontinued Operations
          On March 24, 2011, Bluegreen announced that it had engaged advisors to explore strategic alternatives for Bluegreen Communities, including a possible sale of the division. Based on its analysis of information and the available options presented to it, on June 30, 2011, Bluegreen’s Board of Directors made the determination to seek to sell Bluegreen Communities or all or substantially all of its assets. As a consequence, Bluegreen determined that Bluegreen Communities met the criteria for classification as discontinued operations and, accordingly, the operating results of Bluegreen Communities, which had previously been presented as a separate reporting segment, are included in discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. In addition, the majority of the assets related to Bluegreen Communities are presented separately on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as “assets held for sale from discontinued operations.” The assets held for sale primarily consist of Bluegreen Communities real estate assets valued on our books at $31.8 million and $83.8 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The decrease in the carrying amount of the assets held for sale as of June 30, 2011 as compared to December 31, 2010, primarily relates to a $52.4 million non-cash charge recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2011 to write down the value of Bluegreen Communities’ assets to its estimated fair value less cost to sell. Bluegreen derived the fair value of Bluegreen Communities’ assets available for sale based on the enterprise level discounted cash flow estimates, (Level 3 inputs), and the expressions of interest received in the marketing process of the related assets. Bluegreen recently entered into a non-binding letter of intent with a third party contemplating the sale of Bluegreen Communities, or a similar transaction. However, as of the date of this filing, Bluegreen had not entered into any definitive agreement or agreements with respect to the sale of Bluegreen Communities or its assets, and Bluegreen may not be successful in its efforts to consummate any such sale or sales.
          In December 2009, Core Communities reinitiated efforts to sell two of its commercial leasing projects (sometimes referred to herein as the “Projects”) and began soliciting bids from several potential buyers to purchase assets associated with the Projects. Accordingly, the results of operations for the Projects are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 as discontinued operations. On June 10, 2010, Core sold the Projects to Inland Real Estate Acquisition, Inc. (“Inland”) for approximately $75.4 million. As a result of the sale, Core realized a gain on sale of discontinued operations of approximately $2.6 million in the second quarter of 2010. In connection with the sale, the outstanding balance of the loans related to the assets held for sale was reduced to approximately $800,000 as a result of negotiations with the lender. Core used the proceeds from the sale to repay these loans. As a result, Core was released from its obligations

19


Table of Contents

to the lender with respect to the loans. The Projects net income from discontinued operations was approximately $2.7 million and $2.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
          The following table summarizes the results from discontinued operations of Bluegreen Communities during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and Core Communities during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 (in thousands). Core Communities ceased operations during 2010. Therefore, no comparative information is included for Core Communities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
                                 
    For the Three        
    Months Ended     For the Three Months Ended  
    June 30, 2011     June 30, 2010  
    Bluegreen     Bluegreen              
    Communities     Communities     Core     Total  
Revenue from discontinued operations
  $ 4,170       2,671       1,117       3,788  
Gain on sale of assets
                2,617       2,617  
 
                       
 
    4,170       2,671       3,734       6,405  
 
                       
Costs and Expenses:
                               
Loss on assets held for sale (1)
    52,733                    
Other costs and expenses
    4,325       6,985       1,020       8,005  
Interest expense (3)
    772       1,120             1,120  
 
                       
 
    57,830       8,105       1,020       9,125  
 
                       
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
                               
before income taxes (1)
    (53,660 )     (5,434 )     2,714       (2,720 )
Benefit for income taxes
    (20,634 )     (1,685 )           (1,685 )
 
                       
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (1)
  $ (33,026 )     (3,749 )     2,714       (1,035 )
 
                       
                                 
    For the Six        
    Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2011     June 30, 2010  
    Bluegreen     Bluegreen              
    Communities     Communities     Core     Total  
Revenue from discontinued operations
  $ 9,893       6,268       2,951       9,219  
Gain on sale of assets
                2,617       2,617  
 
                       
 
    9,893       6,268       5,568       11,836  
 
                       
Costs and Expenses:
                               
Loss on assets held for sale (1)
    52,733                    
Other costs and expenses (2)
    10,068       15,724       3,103       18,827  
Interest expense (3)
    1,532       2,288             2,288  
 
                       
 
    64,333       18,012       3,103       21,115  
 
                       
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
                               
before income taxes (1)
    (54,440 )     (11,744 )     2,465       (9,279 )
Benefit for income taxes
    (20,986 )     (4,653 )           (4,653 )
 
                       
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (1)
  $ (33,454 )     (7,091 )     2,465       (4,626 )
 
                       
 
(1)   Loss from discontinued operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 includes Bluegreen Communities’ non-cash loss on assets held for sale of approximately $52.4 million. Additional losses, which may be significant, may be incurred in the future to the extent that actual sales proceeds from the disposition of assets held for sale are materially different from their estimated fair value.
 
(2)   Cost of discontinued operations during the six months ended June 30, 2010 includes Bluegreen Communities non-cash impairment charges of approximately $3.3 million to write down certain phases of completed Communities properties to their estimated fair value less costs to sell at that time. This charge was incurred as a result of continued low volume of sales, reduced prices and the impact of reduced sales on the forecasted sellout period of the projects.
 
(3)   Also included in results of discontinued operations in each of the periods presented is interest expense on notes payable collateralized by certain Bluegreen Communities’ inventory and property and equipment ($27.8 million as of June 30, 2011), as such debt is required to be repaid in full upon the sale of the related assets.

20


Table of Contents

5. Fair Value Measurement
          The following tables present major categories of the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements Using  
            Quoted prices in              
            Active Markets     Significant Other     Significant  
            for Identical     Observable     Unobservable  
    June 30,     Assets     Inputs     Inputs  
Description   2011     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
Mortgage-backed securities
  $ 97,894             97,894        
REMICS (1)
    54,353             54,353        
Agency bonds
    60,059             60,059        
Municipal bonds
    85,305             85,305        
Taxable securities
    17,600             17,600        
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock
    12,336             12,336        
Benihana Common Stock
    4,140       4,140              
Other equity securities
    1,494       1,494              
 
                       
Total
  $ 333,181       5,634       327,547        
 
                       
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements Using  
            Quoted prices in              
            Active Markets     Significant Other     Significant  
            for Identical     Observable     Unobservable  
    December 31,     Assets     Inputs     Inputs  
Description   2010     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
Mortgage-backed securities
  $ 112,042             112,042        
REMICS(1)
    68,841             68,841        
Agency bonds
    60,143             60,143        
Municipal bonds
    162,123             162,123        
Taxable securities
    19,922             19,922        
Foreign currency put options
    24       24              
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock
    21,106                   21,106  
Other equity securities
    20,819       20,819              
 
                       
Total
  $ 465,020       20,843       423,071       21,106  
 
                       
 
(1)   Real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICS) are pass-through entities that hold residential loans. Investors in these entities are issued ownership interests in the entities in the form of a bond. The securities were issued by government agencies.
     There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the Company’s financial statements at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
          The following table presents major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
         
    For the Three Months Ended  
    June 30, 2011  
    Benihana  
    Convertible  
    Preferred Stock  
Beginning Balance
  $ 20,951  
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
       
Included in earnings
     
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
     
Included in other comprehensive loss
     
Purchases, issuances, and settlements (1)
    (5,238 )
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 (1)
    (15,713 )
 
     
Balance at June 30, 2011
  $  
 
     
 
(1)   On May 20, 2011, BFC exercised its right to convert 200,000 shares of its Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Convertible Preferred Stock”) of Benihana into shares of Benihana’s Common Stock. In connection with such conversion, effective for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we began to assess the value of our investment in Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock, as if converted, by using the market approach with Level 2 measurements instead of the income approach with Level 3 measurements which we historically used. BFC converted an additional 100,000 shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of Benihana’s Common Stock during July 2011.

21


Table of Contents

                         
    For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010  
            Benihana        
            Convertible        
    Other Bonds     Preferred Stock     Total  
     
Beginning Balance
  $ 250       20,247       20,497  
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
                       
Included in earnings
                 
Included in other comprehensive income
          (88 )     (88 )
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
                 
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
                 
     
Balance at June 30, 2010
  $ 250       20,159       20,409  
     
          The following tables present major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
         
    For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30, 2011  
    Benihana  
    Convertible  
    Preferred Stock  
Beginning Balance
  $ 21,106  
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
       
Included in earnings
     
Included in other comprehensive loss
    (155 )
Purchases, issuances, and settlements (1)
    (5,238 )
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 (1)
    (15,713 )
 
     
Balance at June 30, 2011
  $  
 
     
 
(1)   On May 20, 2011, BFC exercised its right to convert 200,000 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock of Benihana into shares of Benihana’s Common Stock. In connection with such conversion, effective for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we began to assess the value of our investment in Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock, as if converted, by using the market approach with Level 2 measurements instead of the income approach with Level 3 measurements which we historically used. BFC converted an additional 100,000 shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of Benihana’s Common Stock during July 2011.
                                 
    For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010  
    Retained                      
    Interests in             Benihana        
    Notes     Other     Convertible        
    Receivable Sold     Bonds     Preferred Stock     Total  
     
Beginning Balance
  $ 26,340       250       17,766       44,356  
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
                               
Included in earnings
                       
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (1)
    (26,340 )                 (26,340 )
Included in other comprehensive income
                2,393       2,393  
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
                       
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
                       
     
Balance at June 30, 2010
  $       250       20,159       20,409  
     
 
(1)   Retained interests in notes receivable sold were eliminated upon a change in accounting principle.
          The valuation techniques and the inputs used in our financial statements to measure the fair value of our recurring financial instruments are described below.
          The fair values of agency bonds, municipal bonds, taxable bonds, mortgage-backed securities and REMICs are estimated using independent pricing sources and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing uses a market approach valuation

22


Table of Contents

technique and Level 2 valuation inputs as quoted market prices are not available for the specific securities that BankAtlantic Bancorp owns. The independent pricing sources value these securities using observable market inputs including: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads and other reference data in the secondary institutional market which is the principal market for these types of assets. To validate fair values obtained from the pricing sources, BankAtlantic Bancorp reviews fair value estimates obtained from brokers, investment advisors and others to determine the reasonableness of the fair values obtained from independent pricing sources. BankAtlantic Bancorp reviews any price that it determines may not be reasonable and requires the pricing sources to explain the differences in fair value or reevaluate its fair value.
          As of March 31, 2011, BFC owned 800,000 shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock, the estimated fair value of which was assessed using the income approach with Level 3 inputs by discounting future cash flows at a market discount rate combined with the fair value of the underlying shares of Benihana’s Common Stock that the Company would have received upon conversion of its shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock. On May 20, 2011 BFC converted 200,000 shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock into 397,328 shares of Benihana’s Common Stock. In connection with the conversion, effective for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we began to assess the value of our investment in Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock by using the market approach with Level 2 inputs, as if converted to Common Stock, instead of the income approach with Level 3 inputs. At June 30, 2011, the market value of the 600,000 shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock owned at that date by BFC, if converted to 1,183,899 shares of Common Stock, was approximately $12.3 million, and the market value of the 397,328 shares of Benihana’s Common Stock owned by BFC at that date was approximately $4.1 million. The estimated fair value of our investment in Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock was based on the $10.42 per share closing price of Benihana’s Common Stock on the NASDAQ on June 30, 2011. On July 15, 2011, BFC converted an additional 100,000 shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock owned by it into 197,721 shares of Benihana’s Common Stock. As previously disclosed, these conversions were effected for the purpose of facilitating shareholder approval of Benihana’s currently outstanding proposal to reclassify each share of its Class A Common Stock into one share of its Common Stock. We strongly support Benihana’s reclassification proposal and we intend to vote all shares of Benihana’s stock owned or controlled by us in favor of the reclassification.
          Other equity securities are generally fair valued using the market approach and quoted market prices (Level 1) or matrix pricing (Level 2 or Level 3) with inputs obtained from independent pricing sources, if available. Also non-binding broker quotes are obtained to validate fair values obtained from matrix pricing.
          The fair value of foreign currency put options was obtained using the market approach and quoted market prices using Level 1 inputs as of December 31, 2010.
          The following tables present major categories of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
                                         
    Fair Value Measurements Using        
                                    Total  
            Significant     Significant     Impairments  
            Other Observable     Unobservable     For the Six  
    June 30,     Inputs     Inputs     Months Ended  
Description   2011     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     June 30, 2011 (1)  
Loans measured for
                                       
impairment using the fair value
                                       
of the underlying collateral
  $ 265,245                   265,245       24,624  
Impaired real estate owned
    36,044                   36,044       8,830  
Impaired real estate held for sale
    5,084                   5,084       353  
Impaired loans held for sale
    27,463                   27,463       6,335  
     
Total
  $ 333,836                   333,836       40,142  
     
 
(1)   Total impairments represent the amount of loss recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2011 on assets that were held and measured at fair value as of June 30, 2011.

23


Table of Contents

                                         
            Fair Value Measurements Using        
            Quoted prices in                    
            Active Markets     Significant     Significant     Total Impairment  
    As of     for Identical     Other Observable     Unobservable     For the Six  
    June 30,     Assets     Inputs     Inputs     Months Ended  
Description   2010     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     June 30, 2010 (1)  
Loans measured for
                                       
impairment using the fair value
                                       
of the underlying collateral
  $ 302,199                   302,199       74,584  
Impaired real estate held for sale
    3,490                   3,490       1,510  
Impaired real estate owned
    6,578                   6,578       1,364  
     
Total
  $ 312,267                   312,267       77,458  
     
 
(1)   Total impairments represent the amount of loss recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2010 on assets that were held and measured at fair value as of June 30, 2010.
          There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in the Company’s financial statements.
          Loans Receivable Measured For Impairment
          Impaired loans are generally valued based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. BankAtlantic Bancorp primarily uses third party appraisals to assist in measuring non-homogenous impaired loans. These appraisals generally use the market or income approach valuation technique and use market observable data to formulate an opinion of the fair value of the loan’s collateral. However, the appraiser uses professional judgment in determining the fair value of the collateral or properties, and we may also adjust these values for changes in market conditions subsequent to the appraisal date. When current appraisals are not available for certain loans, BankAtlantic Bancorp uses its judgment on market conditions to adjust the most current appraisal. The sales prices may reflect prices of sales contracts not closed, and the amount of time required to sell out the real estate project may be derived from current appraisals of similar projects. Consequently, the calculation of the fair value of the collateral uses Level 3 inputs. BankAtlantic Bancorp generally uses third party broker price opinions or an automated valuation service to measure the fair value of the collateral for impaired homogenous loans in the establishment of specific reserves or charge-offs when these loans become 120 days delinquent. These third party valuations from real estate professionals also use Level 3 inputs in the determination of the fair values.
          Loans Held for Sale
          Loans held for sale are valued using an income approach with Level 3 inputs as market quotes or sale transactions of similar loans are generally not available. The fair value is estimated by discounting forecasted cash flows using a discount rate that reflects the risks inherent in the loans held for sale portfolio. For non-performing loans held for sale the forecasted cash flows are based on the estimated fair value of the collateral less cost to sell adjusted for foreclosure expenses and other operating expenses of the underlying collateral until foreclosure or sale.
          Impaired Real Estate Owned
          Real estate is generally valued using third party appraisals or broker price opinions. These appraisals generally use the market approach valuation technique and use market observable data to formulate an opinion of the fair value of the properties. However, the appraisers or brokers use professional judgments in determining the fair value of the properties and BankAtlantic Bancorp may also adjust these values for changes in market conditions subsequent to the valuation date. Consequently, the fair values of the properties are considered Level 3 measurements.

24


Table of Contents

Financial Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
          The following table presents information for financial instruments at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
                                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    Carrying     Fair     Carrying     Fair  
    Amount     Value     Amount     Value  
Financial assets:
                               
Cash and due from other banks
  $ 185,489       185,489       178,868       178,868  
Interest bearing deposits in other banks
    318,437       318,437       455,538       455,538  
Restricted cash
    61,351       61,351       62,249       62,249  
Securities available for sale
    333,181       333,181       465,020       465,020  
Investment securities
    333       333       2,033       2,033  
Tax certificates
    66,211       66,389       89,789       90,738  
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
    31,614       31,614       43,557       43,557  
Loans receivable including loans held for sale, net
    2,708,662       2,430,681       3,039,486       2,689,890  
Notes receivable
    543,174       601,355       574,969       619,000  
Financial liabilities:
                               
Deposits
  $ 3,423,576       3,425,619       3,891,190       3,893,807  
Advances from FHLB
                170,000       170,038  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short term borrowings
    1,020       1,020       22,764       22,764  
Receivable-backed notes payable
    515,373       508,323       569,214       560,728  
Notes and mortgage notes payable and other borrowings
    181,441       180,479       239,571       224,866  
Junior subordinated debentures
    469,419       268,515       461,568       220,080  
          Management has made estimates of fair value that it believes to be reasonable. However, because there is no active market for many of these financial instruments and management has derived the fair value of the majority of these financial instruments using the income approach technique with Level 3 unobservable inputs, the Company or its subsidiaries may not receive the estimated value upon sale or disposition of the asset or pay the estimated value upon disposition of the liability in advance of its scheduled maturity. Management estimates used in its net present value financial models rely on assumptions and judgments regarding issues where the outcome is unknown and actual results or values may differ significantly from these estimates. These fair value estimates do not consider the tax effect that would be associated with the disposition of the assets or liabilities at their fair value estimates.
          Interest bearing deposits in other banks other than BankAtlantic at June 30, 2011 include $20.3 million of certificates of deposit guaranteed by the FDIC with maturities of less than one year. Due to the FDIC guarantee and the short-term maturity of these certificates of deposit, the fair value of these deposits approximates the carrying value.
          The fair value of tax certificates was calculated using the income approach with Level 3 inputs. The fair value is based on discounted expected cash flows using discount rates that take into account the risk of the cash flows of tax certificates relative to alternative investments.
          The fair value of FHLB stock is its carrying amount.
          Fair values are estimated for BankAtlantic Bancorp loan portfolios with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by category, and each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and non-performing categories.
          The fair value of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s performing loans is calculated by using an income approach with Level 3 inputs. These fair values are estimated by discounting forecasted cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the interest rate risk inherent in the loan portfolio. The estimate of average maturity is based on BankAtlantic’s historical experience with prepayments for each loan classification, modified as required by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions. Management of BankAtlantic Bancorp assigns a credit risk premium and an illiquidity adjustment to these loans based on risk grades and delinquency status.

25


Table of Contents

          The estimated fair value of notes receivable is based on estimated future cash flows considering contractual payments and estimates of prepayments and defaults, discounted at a market rate (the rate at which similar loans with similar maturities would be made to borrowers with similar credit risk).
          As permitted by applicable accounting guidance, the fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing demand deposits, savings and NOW accounts, and money market and checking accounts, is shown in the above table at book value. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on an income approach with Level 3 inputs. The fair value is calculated by the discounted value of contractual cash flows with the discount rate estimated using current rates offered by BankAtlantic for similar remaining maturities.
          The fair value of short-term borrowings is calculated using the income approach with Level 2 inputs. Contractual cash flows are discounted based on current interest rates. The carrying value of these borrowings approximates fair value as maturities are generally less than thirty days.
          The fair value of FHLB advances was calculated using the income approach with Level 2 inputs. The fair value was based on discounted cash flows using rates offered for debt with comparable terms to maturity and issuer credit standing.
          The estimated fair values of notes and mortgage notes payable and other borrowings, including receivable-backed notes payable, were based upon current rates and spreads a party would pay to obtain similar borrowings.
          In determining the fair value of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s junior subordinated debentures, BankAtlantic Bancorp used NASDAQ price quotes available with respect to its $70.4 million of publicly traded trust preferred securities related to its junior subordinated debentures (“public debentures”). However, $259.2 million of the outstanding trust preferred securities related to its junior subordinated debentures are not traded, but are privately held in pools (“private debentures”) and with no trading markets, sales history, liquidity or readily determinable source for valuation. BankAtlantic Bancorp has deferred the payment of interest with respect to all of its junior subordinated debentures as permitted by the terms of these securities. Based on the deferral status and the lack of liquidity and ability of a holder to actively sell such private debentures, the fair value of these private debentures may be subject to a greater discount to par and have a lower fair value than indicated by the public debenture price quotes. However, due to their private nature and the lack of a trading market, fair value of the private debentures was not readily determinable at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and as a practical alternative, BankAtlantic Bancorp used the NASDAQ price quotes of the public debentures to value its remaining outstanding junior subordinated debentures whether privately held or publicly traded.
          The estimated fair value of Woodbridge’s and Bluegreen’s junior subordinated debentures in the aggregate amount of $128.9 million and $115.7 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, were based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows at a market discount rate or market price quotes from the over-the-counter bond market.
6. Securities Available for Sale
          The following tables summarize securities available for sale (in thousands):
                                 
    As of June 30, 2011  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Estimated  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
Government agency securities:
                               
Mortgage-backed securities
  $ 90,673       7,221             97,894  
Agency bonds
    60,000       59             60,059  
REMICS
    52,175       2,178             54,353  
 
                       
Total
    202,848       9,458             212,306  
 
                       
Investment securities:
                               
Municipal bonds
    85,267       41       3       85,305  
Other bonds
    17,598       4       2       17,600  
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock
    12,319       17             12,336  
Benihana Common Stock
    4,141             1       4,140  
Other equity securities
    1,319       176       1       1,494  
 
                       
Total investment securities
    120,644       238       7       120,875  
 
                       
Total
  $ 323,492       9,696       7       333,181  
 
                       

26


Table of Contents

                                 
    As of December 31, 2010  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Estimated  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
Government agency securities:
                               
Mortgage-backed securities
  $ 105,219       6,823             112,042  
Agency bonds
    60,000       143             60,143  
REMICS
    66,034       2,807             68,841  
 
                       
Total
    231,253       9,773             241,026  
 
                       
Investment securities:
                               
Municipal bonds
    162,113       33       23       162,123  
Other bonds
    19,936       8       22       19,922  
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock
    16,426       4,680             21,106  
Equity securities
    20,634       188       3       20,819  
 
                       
Total investment securities
    219,109       4,909       48       223,970  
 
                       
Derivatives
    24                   24  
 
                       
Total
  $ 450,386       14,682       48       465,020  
 
                       
          The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s securities available for sale with unrealized losses that are deemed temporary, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
                                                 
    As of June 30, 2011  
    Less Than 12 Months     12 Months or Greater     Total  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
Taxable Securities
  $ 12,105       (2 )                 12,105       (2 )
Municipal Bonds
    5,084       (3 )                 5,084       (3 )
Benihana Common Stock
    4,141       (1 )                 4,141       (1 )
Other equity securities
                9       (1 )     9       (1 )
 
                                   
Total
  $ 21,330       (6 )     9       (1 )     21,339       (7 )
 
                                   
                                                 
    As of December 31, 2010  
    Less Than 12 Months     12 Months or Greater             Total  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
Municipal bonds
  $ 90,413       (23 )                 90,413       (23 )
Taxable securities
    15,155       (22 )                 15,155       (22 )
Equity securities
                7       (3 )     7       (3 )
 
                                   
Total
  $ 105,568       (45 )     7       (3 )     105,575       (48 )
 
                                   
          The unrealized losses on municipal bonds and taxable securities outstanding less than 12 months are primarily the result of interest rate changes. BankAtlantic Bancorp expects to receive cash proceeds in an amount equal to its entire investment in municipal bonds and taxable securities upon maturity.
          The unrealized loss on equity securities and Benihana Common Stock at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were not significant. Accordingly, the Company did not consider these investments other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
          Management reviews its investments for other-than-temporary declines in value quarterly. As a consequence of the review during the six months ended June 30, 2011, a $1.5 million other-than-temporary decline in value was recognized related to a private equity investment in an unrelated financial institution.

27


Table of Contents

          The scheduled maturities of debt securities available for sale were (in thousands):
                 
    Debt Securities  
    Available for Sale  
            Estimated  
    Amortized     Fair  
June 30, 2011 (1)   Cost     Value  
Due within one year
  $ 101,611       101,653  
Due after one year, but within five years
    61,404       61,462  
Due after five years, but within ten years
    18,525       19,108  
Due after ten years
    124,173       132,988  
 
           
Total
  $ 305,713       315,211  
 
           
 
(1)   Scheduled maturities in the above table are based on contractual maturities which may vary significantly from actual maturities due to prepayments.
BFC — Benihana Investment
          During 2004, BFC purchased 800,000 shares of Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock for $25.00 per share. The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into Benihana’s Common Stock at a conversion price of $12.67 per share of Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to adjustment from time to time upon the occurrence of certain defined events. During May 2011, we converted 200,000 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock of Benihana into 397,328 shares of Benihana’s Common Stock. On July 15, 2011, we converted an additional 100,000 shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock into 197,721 shares of Benihana’s Common Stock. As described above, we decided to convert these shares of Benihana’s Preferred Stock for the purpose of facilitating shareholder approval of Benihana’s currently outstanding proposal to reclassify each share of its Class A Common Stock into one share of its Common Stock. We strongly support Benihana’s reclassification proposal and we intend to vote all shares of Benihana’s stock owned or controlled by us in favor of the reclassification. The remaining 500,000 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock of Benihana are currently convertible into an aggregate of 986,582 shares of Benihana’s Common Stock. Based on the number of currently outstanding shares of Benihana’s capital stock, the 500,000 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock currently held by us, if converted, together with the 595,049 shares of Benihana’s Common Stock currently held by us would represent an approximately 19% voting interest and an approximately 9% economic interest in Benihana.
          Except as provided by Delaware law, such as in the case of the reclassification proposal described above, the shares of the Convertible Preferred Stock have voting rights on an “as if converted” basis together with Benihana’s Common Stock on all matters put to a vote of the holders of Benihana’s Common Stock. The approval of a majority of the holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock then outstanding, voting as a single class, are required for certain events outside the ordinary course of business. Holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative quarterly dividends at an annual rate equal to $1.25 per share, payable on the last day of each calendar quarter. The Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory redemption at its original issue price of $25 per shares, ($12.5 million for the remaining 500,000 shares) plus accumulated dividends on July 2, 2014 unless the Company elects to extend the mandatory redemption date to a later date not to extend beyond July 2, 2024.
          As of June 30, 2011, the market value of the 600,000 shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock owned at that date by BFC, if converted to 1,183,899 shares of Common Stock, was approximately $12.3 million, and the market value of the 397,328 shares of Benihana’s Common Stock owned by BFC at that date was approximately $4.1 million. The estimated fair value of our investment in Benihana’s Convertible Preferred and Common Stock was based on the $10.42 per share closing price of Benihana’s Common Stock on the NASDAQ on June 30, 2011.

28


Table of Contents

7. Loans Receivable
          The consolidated loan portfolio consisted of the following (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Commercial non-real estate
  $ 124,830       135,588  
Commercial real estate:
               
Residential
    104,605       133,155  
Land
    29,634       58,040  
Owner occupied
    97,153       111,097  
Other
    520,220       592,538  
Small Business:
               
Real estate
    196,975       203,479  
Non-real estate
    95,783       99,190  
Consumer:
               
Consumer — home equity
    575,244       604,228  
Consumer other
    15,069       16,068  
Deposit overdrafts
    2,824       3,091  
Residential:
               
Residential-interest only
    437,860       541,788  
Residential-amortizing
    594,396       671,948  
 
           
Total gross loans
    2,794,593       3,170,210  
 
           
Adjustments:
               
Premiums, discounts and net deferred fees
    2,287       1,650  
Allowance for loan losses
    (137,643 )     (162,139 )
 
           
Loans receivable — net
  $ 2,659,237       3,009,721  
 
           
Loans held for sale
  $ 49,425       29,765  
 
           
          BankAtlantic Bancorp’s loans held for sale as of June 30, 2011 consisted of $22.8 million of residential loans, $26.1 million of commercial loans and $0.5 million of residential loans originated for sale. Loans held for sale as of December 31, 2010 consisted of $27.9 million of commercial real estate loans transferred from held-for-investment to held-for-sale classification during the fourth quarter of 2010 and $1.8 million of residential loans originated for sale. BankAtlantic Bancorp transfers loans to held-for-sale when, based on the current economic environment and related market conditions, it does not have the intent to hold those loans for the foreseeable future. The Company recognized a $47,000 gain and a $16,000 loss on the sale of loans held for sale for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively compared to $87,000 and $141,000 of gains on the sale of loans held for sale during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
          The recorded investment (unpaid principal balance less charge offs and deferred fees) of non-accrual loans receivable and loans held for sale was (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
Loan Class   2011     2010  
Commercial non-real estate
  $ 18,046       17,659  
Commercial real estate:
               
Residential
    82,673       95,482  
Land
    19,657       27,260  
Owner occupied
    6,565       4,870  
Other
    90,201       128,658  
Small business:
               
Real estate
    10,021       8,928  
Non-real estate
    1,969       1,951  
Consumer
    14,614       14,120  
Residential:
               
Residential-interest only
    34.507       38,900  
Residential-amortizing
    46.855       47,639  
 
           
Total
  $ 325,108       385,467  
 
           

29


Table of Contents

          An age analysis of the past due recorded investment in loans receivable and loans held for sale as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was as follows (in thousands):
                                                 
                                            Total  
    31-59 Days     60-89 Days     90 Days     Total             Loans  
June 30, 2011   Past Due     Past Due     or More (1)     Past Due     Current     Receivable (2)  
Commercial non-Real estate
  $ 338       750       13,446       14,534       110,296       124,830  
Commercial real estate:
                                               
Residential
                42,726       42,726       66,448       109,174  
Land
          3,458       16,199       19,657       21,966       41,623  
Owner occupied
          861       5,567       6,428       92,198       98,626  
Other
                34,903       34,903       495,717       530,620  
Small business:
                                               
Real estate
    1,104       1,851       8,543       11,498       185,477       196,975  
Non-real estate
    64       33       119       216       95,567       95,783  
Consumer
    5,034       4,177       14,614       23,825       569,312       593,137  
Residential:
                                               
Residential-interest only
    4,956       2,249       33,627       40,832       413,689       454,521  
Residential-amortizing
    5,361       3,798       42,945       52,104       556,522       608,626  
                                     
Total
  $ 16,857       17,177       212,689       246,723       2,607,192       2,853,915  
                                     
                                                 
                                            Total  
    31-59 Days     60-89 Days     90 Days     Total             Loans  
December 31, 2010   Past Due     Past Due     or More (1)     Past Due     Current     Receivable (2)  
     
Commercial non-real estate
  $             13,498       13,498       122,090       135,588  
Commercial real estate:
                                               
Residential
    4,700             53,791       58,491       84,325       142,816  
Land
                23,803       23,803       34,237       58,040  
Owner occupied
                3,862       3,862       107,235       111,097  
Other
          6,043       54,940       60,983       551,472       612,455  
Small business:
                                               
Real estate
    1,530       2,059       6,670       10,259       193,220       203,479  
Non-real estate
          67       25       92       99,098       99,190  
Consumer
    6,396       6,009       14,120       26,525       596,862       623,387  
Residential:
                                               
Interest only
    4,907       6,164       38,900       49,971       500,275       550,246  
Amortizing
    6,091       5,926       47,487       59,504       614,281       673,785  
     
Total
  $ 23,624       26,268       257,096       306,988       2,903,095       3,210,083  
     
 
(1)   BankAtlantic Bancorp had no loans greater than 90 days and accruing interest as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
 
(2)   As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, total loans receivable exclude purchase accounting adjustments of $7.6 million and $8.5 million, respectively, in connection with BFC’s acquisitions of shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock during 2008. The 2008 share acquisitions were accounted for as step acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting then in effect.

30


Table of Contents

          The activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
                                                 
            Commercial                          
    Commercial     Real     Small                    
    Non-Real Estate     Estate     Business     Consumer     Residential     Total  
     
Allowance for Loan Losses:
                                               
Beginning balance
  $ 10,708       79,142       10,125       27,511       27,565       155,051  
Charge-off :
    (124 )     (14,875 )     (2,010 )     (6,379 )     (5,767 )     (29,155 )
Recoveries :
    57       75       203       492       435       1,262  
Provision :
    376       3,937       1,535       3,375       1,487       10,710  
Transfer to held for sale:
          (225 )                       (225 )
     
Ending balance
  $ 11,017       68,054       9,853       24,999       23,720       137,643  
     
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 9,618       47,638       1,595       1,671       4,555       65,077  
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
    1,399       20,416       8,258       23,328       19,165       72,566  
     
Total
  $ 11,017       68,054       9,853       24,999       23,720       137,643  
     
Loans receivable:
                                               
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 34,569       285,325       10,370       24,576       57,740       412,580  
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
  $ 90,261       466,287       282,388       568,561       982,126       2,389,623  
     
Total (1)
  $ 124,830       751,612       292,758       593,137       1,039,866       2,802,203  
     
Purchases of loans
  $                         9,816       9,816  
     
Proceeds from loan sales
  $       24,693                     4,983       29,676  
     
Transfer to held for sale
  $       28,444                         28,444  
     
 
(1)   Total loans receivable exclude purchase accounting adjustments of $7.6 million in connection with BFC’s acquisitions of shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock during 2008. The 2008 share acquisitions were accounted for as step acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting then in effect.
     The activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
                                                 
            Commercial                
    Commercial   Real   Small            
    Non-Real Estate   Estate   Business   Consumer   Residential   Total
     
Allowance for Loan Losses:
                                               
Beginning balance
  $ 10,786       83,859       11,514       32,043       23,937       162,139  
Charge-off :
    (588 )     (26,152 )     (4,621 )     (14,193 )     (13,778 )     (59,332 )
Recoveries :
    848       793       513       900       566       3,620  
Provision :
    (29 )     11,169       2,447       6,249       18,686       38,522  
Transfer to held for sale:
          (1,615 )                 (5,691 )     (7,306 )
     
Ending balance
  $ 11,017       68,054       9,853       24,999       23,720       137,643  
     
Purchases of loans
  $                         13,680       13,680  
     
Proceeds from loan sales
  $       27,793                     12,601       40,394  
     
Transfer to held for sale
  $       30,894                   25,072       55,966  
     
     Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was as follows (in thousands):
                 
    For the Three     For the Six  
    Months Ended     Months Ended  
    June 30, 2010     June 30, 2010  
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 177,597       187,218  
Loans charged-off
    (39,167 )     (80,590 )
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
    879       1,926  
 
           
Net charge-offs
    (38,288 )     (78,664 )
Provision for loan losses
    48,553       79,308  
 
           
Balance, end of period
  $ 187,862       187,862  
 
           
Impaired Loans — Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, BankAtlantic Bancorp believes it is probable that it will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. For a loan that has been restructured, the contractual terms of the loan agreement refer to the contractual terms specified by the original loan agreement, not the contractual terms specified by the restructured

31


Table of Contents

agreement. Impairment is evaluated based on past due status for consumer and residential loans. Impairment is evaluated as part of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s on-going credit monitoring process for commercial and small business loans which results in the evaluation for impairment of all criticized loans. Factors considered in determining if a loan is impaired are past payment history, strength of the borrower or guarantors, and cash flow associated with the collateral or business. If a loan is impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, based on the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing interest rate or at the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. BankAtlantic Bancorp generally measures loans for impairment using the fair value of collateral less cost to sell method. Interest payments on impaired loans for all loan classes are recognized on a cash basis, unless collectability of the principal and interest amount is probable, in which case interest is recognized on an accrual basis. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible. Impaired loans held for sale are measured for impairment based on the estimated fair value of the collateral less cost to sell adjusted for foreclosure expenses and other operating expenses of the underlying collateral until foreclosure and sale.
          Impaired loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
                                                 
    As of June 30, 2011     As of December 31, 2010  
            Unpaid                     Unpaid        
    Recorded     Principal     Related     Recorded     Principal     Related  
    Investment     Balance     Allowance     Investment     Balance     Allowance  
         
With an allowance recorded:
                                               
Commercial non-real estate
  $ 15,701       15,701       9,618       16,809       16,809       9,850  
Commercial real estate:
                                               
Residential
    88,335       118,491       25,170       81,731       87,739       21,298  
Land
    5,310       5,310       1,734       15,209       15,209       8,156  
Owner occupied
    1,890       1,890       549       1,695       1,695       335  
Other
    85,823       88,930       20,185       95,693       96,873       33,197  
Small business:
                                               
Real estate
    8,436       8,441       272       2,602       2,602       1,733  
Non-real estate
    1,934       1,934       1,323       1,779       1,779       1,203  
Consumer
    18,101       19,479       1,671       3,729       5,029       1,791  
Residential:
                                               
Residential-interest only
    11,367       15,265       1,696       31,805       39,451       6,741  
Residential-amortizing
    14,882       18,632       2,859       24,619       28,712       5,293  
         
Total with allowance recorded
  $ 251,779       294,073       65,077       275,671       295,898       89,597  
         
With no related allowance recorded:
                                               
Commercial non-real estate
  $ 20,566       21,154             1,497       1,497        
Commercial real estate:
                                               
Residential
    17,990       49,861             44,835       116,092        
Land
    16,559       51,944             14,039       43,846        
Owner occupied
    6,119       6,784             3,922       3,922        
Other
    81,001       97,552             81,370       97,203        
Small business:
                                               
Real estate
    9,207       10,537             15,727       16,499        
Non-real estate
    443       782             172       197        
Consumer
    10,010       12,661             23,029       27,146        
Residential:
                                               
Residential-interest only
    23,140       36,350             7,427       10,078        
Residential-amortizing
    34,471       46,788             25,664       31,797        
         
Total with no allowance recorded
  $ 219,506       334,413             217,682       348,277        
         
 
                                               
Commercial non-real estate
  $ 36,267       36,855       9,618       18,306       18,306       9,850  
Commercial real estate
    303,027       420,762       47,638       338,494       462,579       62,986  
Small business
    20,020       21,694       1,595       20,280       21,077       2,936  
Consumer
    28,111       32,140       1,671       26,758       32,175       1,791  
Residential
    83,860       117,035       4,555       89,515       110,038       12,034  
         
Total
  $ 471,285       628,486       65,077       493,353       644,175       89,597  
         

32


Table of Contents

          Average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans as of June 30, 2011 were (in thousands):
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2011     June 30, 2011  
    Average Recorded     Interest Income     Average Recorded     Interest Income  
    Investment     Recognized     Investment     Recognized  
         
With an allowance recorded:
                               
Commercial non-real estate
  $ 15,404       168       15,872       184  
Commercial real estate:
                               
Residential
    91,127       841       87,995       1,251  
Land
    5,369       25       8,649       50  
Owner occupied
    3,028             2,583        
Other
    100,280       388       98,751       682  
Small business:
                               
Real estate
    8,209             6,340        
Non-real estate
    1,941             1,887        
Consumer
    17,675             13,026        
Residential:
                               
Residential-interest only
    14,413             20,210        
Residential-amortizing
    15,342             18,434        
         
Total with allowance recorded
  $ 272,788       1,422       273,747       2,167  
         
With no related allowance recorded:
                               
Commercial non-real estate
  $ 11,746       2       8,329       8  
Commercial real estate:
                               
Residential
    21,203       40       29,080       110  
Land
    16,638             15,771        
Owner occupied
    5,018       33       4,652       69  
Other
    80,084       536       80,513       778  
Small business:
                               
Real estate
    9,334       122       11,465       252  
Non-real estate
    624       7       473       14  
Consumer
    9,668       111       14,122       222  
Residential:
                             
Residential-interest only
    21,740             16,969        
Residential-amortizing
    32,948       32       30,520       60  
         
Total with no allowance recorded
  $ 209,003       883       211,894       1,513  
         
 
                               
Commercial non-real estate
  $ 27,150       170       24,201       192  
Commercial real estate
    322,747       1,863       327,994       2,940  
Small business
    20,108       129       20,165       266  
Consumer
    27,343       111       27,148       222  
Residential
    84,443       32       86,133       60  
         
Total
  $ 481,791       2,305       485,641       3,680  
         
          Impaired loans without specific valuation allowances represent loans that were written-down to the fair value of the collateral less cost to sell, loans in which the collateral value less cost to sell was greater than the carrying value of the loan, loans in which the present value of the cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate was equal to or greater than the carrying value of the loan, or large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are collectively measured for impairment.
          BankAtlantic Bancorp monitors collateral dependent loans and performs an impairment analysis on these loans quarterly. Generally, a full appraisal is obtained when a real estate loan is initially evaluated for impairment and an updated full appraisal is obtained within one year from the prior appraisal date, or earlier if management deems it appropriate based on significant changes in market conditions. In instances where a property is in the process of foreclosure, an updated appraisal may be postponed beyond one year, as an appraisal is required on the date of foreclosure; however, such loans are subject to quarterly impairment analyses.
          Included in total impaired loans as of June 30, 2011 was $270.3 million of collateral dependent loans, of which $168.8 million were measured for impairment using current appraisals and $101.4 million were measured by

33


Table of Contents

adjusting appraisals greater than six months old, as appropriate, to reflect changes in market conditions subsequent to the last appraisal date. Appraised values with respect to 28 loans which did not have current appraisals were adjusted down by an aggregate amount of $8.3 million to reflect the change in market conditions since the last appraisal date.
          As of June 30, 2011, impaired loans with specific valuation allowances had been previously written down by $51.2 million and impaired loans without specific valuation allowances had been previously written down by $89.3 million. BankAtlantic had commitments to lend $6.0 million of additional funds on impaired loans as of June 30, 2011.
          Credit Quality Information
          Management of BankAtlantic Bancorp monitors net charge-off levels of classified loans, impaired loans and general economic conditions nationwide and in Florida in an effort to assess loan credit quality. BankAtlantic Bancorp uses a risk grading matrix to monitor credit quality for commercial and small business loans. Risk grades are assigned to each commercial and small business loan upon origination. The loan officers monitor the risk grades and these risk grades are reviewed periodically by a third party consultant. BankAtlantic Bancorp assigns risk grades on a scale of 1 to 13. A general description of the risk grades is as follows:
          Grades 1 to 7 — The loans in these risk grades are generally well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or guarantors or by the fair value, less cost to sell, of the underlying collateral.
          Grades 8 to 9 — Not used
          Grade 10 — These loans are considered to have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. While these loans do not expose BankAtlantic Bancorp to immediate risk of loss, if left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan.
          Grade 11 — These loans are considered to be inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or guarantors or by the collateral pledged, if any. Loans in this grade have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the loan and there is a distinct possibility that BankAtlantic Bancorp may sustain some credit loss if the weaknesses are not corrected.
          Grade 12 — These loans are considered to have all the weaknesses of a Grade 11 with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s investment in the loan highly questionable and improbable on the basis of currently known facts, conditions and fair values of the collateral.
          Grade 13 — These loans, or portions thereof, are considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance on the BankAtlantic Bancorp’s books as an asset is not warranted without the establishment of a specific valuation allowance or a charge-off. Such loans are generally charged down or completely charged off.
          The following table presents risk grades for commercial and small business loans including loans held for sale as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
                                                         
                            Owner                    
                            Occupied     Other     Small     Small  
    Commercial     Commercial     Commercial     Commercial     Commercial     Business     Business  
June 30, 2011   Non-Real Estate     Residential     Land     Real Estate     Real Estate     Real Estate     Non-real Estate  
     
Risk Grade (1):
                                                       
Grades 1 to 7
  $ 68,605       2,130       19,520       87,749       242,706       168,877       81,485  
Grade 10
    13,892       1,339                   118,834       2,876       4,204  
Grade 11
    42,333       105,705       22,103       10,877       169,080       25,222       10,094  
     
Total
  $ 124,830       109,174       41,623       98,626       530,620       196,975       95,783  
     

34


Table of Contents

                                                         
                            Owner                    
                            Occupied     Other     Small     Small  
    Commercial     Commercial     Commercial     Commercial     Commercial     Business     Business  
December 31, 2010   Non-Real Estate     Residential     Land     Real Estate     Real Estate     Real Estate     Non-Real Estate  
     
Risk Grade (1):
                                                       
Grades 1 to 7
  $ 81,789       16,250       27,387       101,855       314,402       169,979       84,584  
Grade 10
    12,827       7,572       956       704       119,508       3,098       3,665  
Grade 11
    40,972       118,994       29,697       8,538       178,545       30,402       10,941  
     
Total
  $ 135,588       142,816       58,040       111,097       612,455       203,479       99,190  
     
 
(1)   There were no loans risk graded 12 or 13 as of June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
          BankAtlantic Bancorp monitors the credit quality of residential loans through loan-to-value ratios of the underlying collateral. Elevated loan-to-value ratios indicate the likelihood of increased credit losses upon default which results in higher loan portfolio credit risk.
          The loan-to-value ratios of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s residential loans were as follows (in thousands):
                                 
                    As Corrected (3)  
    As of June 30, 2011 (1)     As of December 31, 2010  
    Residential     Residential     Residential     Residential  
Loan-to-value ratios   Interest Only     Amortizing     Interest Only     Amortizing  
       
Ratios not available (2)
  $ 148,702       324,118       59,520       185,610  
=<60%
    27,488       82,262       47,605       145,075  
60.1% — 70%
    15,768       33,340       33,005       49,732  
70.1% — 80%
    31,275       31,908       37,808       48,586  
80.1% — 90%
    30,870       27,340       47,574       47,039  
>90.1%
    200,418       109,658       324,734       197,743  
 
                       
Total
  $ 454,521       608,626       550,246       673,785  
 
                       
 
(1)   Current loan-to-value ratios (“LTV”) for the majority of the portfolio were obtained as of the second quarter of 2011 based on automated valuation models.
 
(2)   Ratios not available consisted of property addresses not in the automated valuation database, and $77.3 million and $78.0 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, of loans originated under the community reinvestment act program that are not monitored based on loan-to-value.
 
(3)   The principal amount of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s residential loans set forth in the table in Note 10 to the Company’s financial statements in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 were incorrectly identified as reflecting loan-to-value ratios obtained as of the first quarter of 2010 when in fact the amounts instead reflected loan-to-value ratios as of the date of loan origination. The above table labeled “As Corrected” reflects loan-to-value ratios as of December 31, 2010 based on first quarter of 2010 valuations. .
          BankAtlantic Bancorp monitors the credit quality of its portfolio of consumer loans secured by real estate utilizing loan-to-value ratios at origination. BankAtlantic Bancorp’s experience indicates that default rates are significantly lower with loans that have lower loan-to-value ratios at origination.
          The loan-to-value ratio at loan origination of consumer loans secured by real estate were as follows (in thousands):
                 
    Consumer Home Equity  
    June 30,     December 31,  
Loan-to-value ratios   2011     2010  
<70%
  $ 351,360       363,653  
70.1% — 80%
    100,139       106,180  
80.1% — 90%
    67,463       72,529  
90.1% — 100%
    43,909       48,537  
>100%
    12,373       13,329  
 
           
Total
  $ 575,244       604,228  
 
           
          BankAtlantic Bancorp monitors the credit quality of its consumer non-real estate loans based on loan delinquencies.

35


Table of Contents

8. Notes Receivable
          The table below sets forth information relating to Bluegreen’s notes receivable (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Notes receivable, gross
  $ 657,896       712,145  
Purchase accounting adjustment
    (35,562 )     (43,778 )
 
           
Notes receivable, net of discount
    622,334       668,367  
Allowance for loan losses
    (79,160 )     (93,398 )
 
           
Notes receivable, net
  $ 543,174       574,969  
 
           
          Included in the table above are notes receivable which for accounting purposes are treated as having been acquired by BFC based on our November 2009 acquisition of approximately 7.4 million shares of Bluegreen’s Common Stock giving us a controlling interest in Bluegreen. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance “Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality", BFC has elected to recognize interest income on these notes receivable using the expected cash flows method. BFC treated expected prepayments consistently in determining its cash flows which it anticipates to collect, such that the non-accretable difference is not affected and the difference between actual prepayments and expected prepayments shall not affect the non-accretable difference. The assumption for prepayment rates was derived from Bluegreen’s historical performance information for its off-balance sheet securitizations and ranges from 4% to 9%. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the outstanding contractual unpaid principal balance of these notes receivable was $221.3 million and $250.6 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying amount of these notes receivable was $185.8 million and $206.9 million, respectively.
          The carrying amount of these notes is included in the balance sheet amounts of notes receivable at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The following is a reconciliation of accretable yield as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
          Accretable Yield
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 85,906       102,665  
Accretion
    (21,107 )     (29,065 )
Reclassification from nonaccretable yield
    15,914       12,306  
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 80,713       85,906  
 
           
          All of Bluegreen’s vacation ownership interests (“VOIs”) notes receivable bear interest at fixed rates. The weighted-average interest rate charged on loans secured by VOIs was 15.3% and 15.2% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate charged on notes receivable secured by home sites was 7.7% at June 30, 2011 and 7.8% at December 31, 2010.
          Bluegreen’s VOI notes receivable are generally secured by properties located in Florida, Louisiana, Nevada, New Jersey, Michigan, Missouri, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Aruba. The majority of Bluegreen Communities notes receivables are secured by home sites in Georgia, Texas, and Virginia.
          Allowance for uncollectible notes receivable
          The table below sets forth the activity in the allowance for uncollectible notes receivable during the six months ended June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
         
Balance at December 31, 2010 (a)
  $ 93,398  
Provision for loan losses
    10,750  
Write-offs of uncollectible receivables
    (24,988 )
 
           
Balance at June 30, 2011
  $ 79,160  
 
     
 
(a)   Allowance for uncollectible notes receivable represents the amount attributable to new loan originations subsequent to the date of our acquisition of a controlling interest in Bluegreen (November 16, 2009).

36


Table of Contents

          Bluegreen holds large amounts of homogeneous VOI notes receivable and assesses uncollectibility based on pools of receivables. In estimating future credit losses, Bluegreen does not use a single primary indicator of credit quality but instead evaluates its VOI notes based upon a combination of factors including a static pool analysis, the aging of the respective receivables, current default trends, prepayment rates by origination year, and the FICO scores of the buyers.
          The following table shows the aging of Bluegreen’s VOI notes receivable as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Current
  $ 615,179       655,304  
31-59 days
    7,504       12,063  
60-89 days
    6,600       10,228  
90 days and over
    22,440       27,785  
Purchase accounting adjustment
    (35,562 )     (43,778 )
 
           
Notes receivable, net of purchase accounting adjustments
    616,161       661,602  
Allowance for loan losses
    (79,160 )     (93,398 )
 
           
Notes receivable, net
  $ 537,001       568,204  
 
           
9. Variable Interest Entities — Bluegreen
          In accordance with the guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities, Bluegreen analyzes its variable interests, including loans, guarantees, and equity investments, to determine if an entity in which it has a variable interest is a variable interest entity. Bluegreen’s analysis includes both quantitative and qualitative reviews. Bluegreen bases its quantitative analysis on the forecasted cash flows of the entity, and it bases its qualitative analysis on its review of the design of the entity, its organizational structure including decision-making ability, and relevant financial agreements. Bluegreen also uses qualitative analyses to determine if it must consolidate a variable interest entity as the primary beneficiary.
          Bluegreen sells through special purpose finance entities, VOI notes receivable originated by Bluegreen Resorts. These transactions are generally structured as non-recourse to Bluegreen, with the exception of one securitization transaction entered into in 2010, which was guaranteed by Bluegreen. These transactions are generally designed to provide liquidity for Bluegreen and transfer the economic risks and certain of the benefits of the notes receivable to third parties. In a securitization, various classes of debt securities are issued by the special purpose finance entities that are generally collateralized by a single tranche of transferred assets, which consist of VOI notes receivable. Bluegreen services the notes receivable for a fee. With each securitization, Bluegreen generally retains a portion of the securities. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance currently in effect, we consolidate these entities into our financial statements as we are the primary beneficiary of the entities.
          During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen transferred $21.0 million of VOI notes receivable to the VIEs and received cash proceeds of $14.7 million. At June 30, 2011, the principal balance of VOI notes receivable included within the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition that are restricted to satisfy obligations of the VIE’s obligations totaled $486.1 million. In addition, approximately $38.8 million of restricted cash is held in accounts for the benefit of the variable interest entities. Further, at June 30, 2011, the carrying amount of the consolidated liabilities included within the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition for these variable interest entities totaled $412.8 million, comprised of $393.8 million of non-recourse receivable-backed notes payable and $18.9 million of receivable-backed notes payable which is recourse to Bluegreen.
          Under the terms of certain of Bluegreen’s timeshare note sales, Bluegreen has the right at its option to repurchase or substitute for a limited amount of defaulted mortgage notes at the outstanding principal balance plus accrued interest or, in some facilities, at 24% of the original sale price associated with the VOI which collateralizes the defaulted mortgage note. Voluntary repurchases or substitutions by Bluegreen of defaulted notes during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were $14.5 million and $24.3 million, respectively.

37


Table of Contents

10. Real Estate Inventory
     Real estate inventory consisted of the following (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Land and land development costs
  $ 19,728       28,983  
Bluegreen Resorts
    218,119       230,346  
Other costs
    119       554  
Land and facilities held for sale
    5,084       5,436  
 
           
Total
  $ 243,050       265,319  
 
           
          Inventory consisted of the combined real estate assets of Bluegreen Resorts, Carolina Oak, Core Communities, BankAtlantic’s residential construction development acquired in 2002, and BankAtlantic’s land and facilities held for sale for BankAtlantic’s store expansion program. During the fourth quarter of 2010, Core relinquished to its lenders title to substantially all of the land Core owned in both Florida and South Carolina and conveyed its ownership interests in several of its subsidiaries. During February 2011, Core was released from any other claims arising from or relating to the loans. However, as described in Note 2 above and Note 11 below, land and land development costs include $19.4 million related to certain assets within Core’s South Carolina property which are subject to separate foreclosure proceedings that are not expected to begin until the fourth quarter in 2011. See Note 2 for additional information.
          Bluegreen’s estimates the fair value of the underlying properties based on either the prices of comparable properties or our analysis of their estimated future cash flows (Level 3 inputs), discounted at rates commensurate with the risk inherent in the property. Bluegreen estimates future cash flows based upon its expectations of performance given current and projected forecasts of the economy and real estate markets in general. Should adverse conditions in the real estate market continue longer than forecasted or deteriorate further or if Bluegreen’s performance does not meet the expectations on which its estimates were based, or if Bluegreen otherwise determines based on information available that the carrying value of the assets exceed their fair value, additional charges may be recorded in the future.
11. Debt
Woodbridge
          On April 26, 2011, Woodbridge and Carolina Oak entered into a settlement agreement with a note holder to resolve the disputes and litigation between them relating to an approximately $37.2 million loan which was collateralized by property owned by Carolina Oak. See Note 2 for additional information regarding the settlement agreement.
Core
          During November 2010, Core entered into a settlement agreement with one of its lenders, which had previously commenced actions seeking foreclosure of mortgage loans totaling approximately $113.9 million collateralized by property in Florida and South Carolina. Approximately $27.2 million of the $113.9 million of mortgage loans is collateralized by property in South Carolina which had an estimated carrying value of approximately $19.4 million at June 30, 2011. This property is subject to separate foreclosure proceedings which are expected to occur during the fourth quarter of 2011. While Core was released by the lender from any other claims relating to the loans, applicable accounting guidance requires that the $27.2 million of debt and associated $19.4 million of collateral remain in Core’s financial statements until the foreclosure proceedings have been completed.
          In December 2010, Core and one of its subsidiaries entered agreements, including a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreement, with one of their lenders which resolved the foreclosure proceedings commenced by the lender related to property at Tradition Hilton Head which served as collateral for a $25 million loan.
          See Note 2 for additional information regarding these agreements.

38


Table of Contents

Bluegreen
          Bluegreen’s pledged assets under its facilities and notes payable as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 had a carrying amount before purchase accounting adjustments of approximately $258.6 million and $350.3 million, respectively.
Significant changes related to Bluegreen’s lines-of credit and notes payable since December 31, 2010 include:
RFA AD&C Facility. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen repaid $8.1 million of the outstanding balance under this facility, including the repayment in full of a loan collateralized by Bluegreen’s Fountains Resort in Orlando, Florida.
H4BG Communities Facility. The H4BG Communities Facility is secured by the real property homesites (and personal property related thereto) and golf courses at several Bluegreen Communities projects. The facility is scheduled to mature on December 31, 2012, however, if the assets pledged as collateral for this facility are sold prior to the scheduled maturity date, the facility will mature upon the sale of the assets. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen repaid $3.4 million of the outstanding balance under this facility.
Wells Fargo Term Loan. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen repaid $5.8 million of the outstanding balance under this facility.
Receivable-Backed Notes Payable
          Bluegreen’s pledged receivables under its receivable-backed notes payable as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 had a principal balance before purchase accounting adjustments of approximately $616.3million and $667.0 million, respectively.
2011 Liberty Bank Facility. In February 2011, Bluegreen entered into a new revolving hypothecation facility with certain participants in its 2008 Liberty Bank Facility. This new $60.0 million facility (“2011 Liberty Bank Facility”) provides for an 85% advance on eligible receivables pledged under the facility during a two-year period ending in February 2013, subject to eligible collateral and terms and conditions Bluegreen believes to be customary for transactions of this type. Availability under the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility is reduced by amounts currently outstanding to certain syndicate participants under the 2008 Liberty Bank Facility ($42.2 million as of June 30, 2011), but as outstanding amounts on the 2008 Liberty Bank facility amortize over time, the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility will revolve up to $60.0 million. Principal and interest are repaid as cash is collected on the pledged receivables, with the remaining balance due in February 2016. Indebtedness under the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility bears interest at the Prime Rate plus 2.25%, subject to a floor of 6.5%. (6.5% as of June 30, 2011). During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen pledged $7.9 million of VOI notes receivable to this facility and received cash proceeds of $6.7 million. Bluegreen also repaid $0.7 million on the facility.
NBA Receivables Facility. Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture has an existing $20.0 million timeshare receivables hypothecation facility with National Bank of Arizona (“NBA”), which provides an 85% advance on eligible receivables. At the time of closing of the transaction, $23.5 million of eligible receivables were pledged. In May 2011, the facility was amended to allow us to pledge additional timeshare receivables through October 31, 2011, with additional advances not to exceed $5.0 million, subject to a total $20.0 million borrowing limit for all amounts outstanding under the facility. The unpaid balance related to the initial September 30, 2010 advance, of which $15.3 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2011, matures on September 30, 2017. The unpaid balance related to the additional advances of which $3.9 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2011, matures on October 31, 2018. All principal and interest payments received on pledged receivables are applied to principal and interest due under the facility. Indebtedness under this facility bears interest at the 30-day LIBOR plus 5.25%, subject to a floor of 6.75% (6.75% as of June 30, 2011). During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen pledged $4.6 million of VOI notes receivable to this facility and received cash proceeds of $3.9 million. Bluegreen also repaid $3.0 million on this facility.
BB&T Purchase Facility. Bluegreen has a $75.0 million timeshare notes receivable purchase facility with Branch Banking and Trust Company (“BB&T”) (the “BB&T Purchase Facility”), which has a revolving advance period through December 17, 2011. The BB&T Purchase Facility provides for the financing of our timeshare receivables at an advance rate of 67.5%, subject to the terms of the facility. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen

39


Table of Contents

pledged $17.0 million of VOI notes receivable to this facility and received cash proceeds of $11.5 million. Bluegreen also repaid $0.3 million on the facility.
Quorum Purchase Facility. Bluegreen has a $20.0 million timeshare notes receivable purchase facility (the “Quorum Facility”) with Quorum Federal Credit Union (“Quorum”) which allows Bluegreen to sell timeshare notes receivable on a non-recourse basis, through December 22, 2011. The terms of the Quorum Facility provide an 80% advance rate and a program fee rate of 8% per annum through August 31, 2011, and terms to be agreed upon through December 22, 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen pledged $4.0 million of VOI notes receivable to this facility and received cash proceeds of $3.2 million. Bluegreen also repaid $0.1 million on the facility.
Other Facilities. In addition to the payments on the above described facilities, during the six months ended June 30, 2011 Bluegreen repaid $76.3 million on its other receivable-backed notes payable facilities.
Junior Subordinated Debentures
          As more fully disclosed under the caption Junior Subordinated Debentures in Note 23 “Debt” to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, some of the Company’s subsidiaries have formed statutory business trusts (collectively, the “Trusts”), each of which issued trust preferred securities and invested the proceeds thereof in its junior subordinated debentures. The Trusts are variable interest entities in which the Company’s subsidiaries are not the primary beneficiaries as defined by the accounting guidance for consolidation. Accordingly, the Company does not consolidate the operations of the Trusts; instead, the Trusts are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Interest on the junior subordinated debentures and distributions on the trust preferred securities are payable quarterly in arrears at the same interest rate.
          On March 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by Levitt Capital Trust (“LCT”) I contractually changed from a fixed-rate of 8.11% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR + 3.85% (4.10% as of June 30, 2011).
          On July 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by LCT II contractually changed from a fixed-rate of 8.09% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR + 3.80% (4.07% as of June 30, 2011).
          On June 30, 2011, the interest rate on the securities issued by LCT III contractually changed from a fixed-rate of 9.251% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR + 3.80% (4.05% as of June 30, 2011).
          On March 30, 2010, the interest rates on the securities issued by Bluegreen Statutory Trust (“BST”) I contractually changed from a fixed-rate of 9.160% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR + 4.90% (5.15% as of June 30, 2011).
          On July 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by BST II and BST III contractually changed from a fixed- rate of 9.158% and 9.193%, respectively, to a variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR + 4.85% (5.10% as of June 30, 2011).
          On June 30, 2011, the interest rate on the securities issued by BST IV contractually changed from a fixed-rate of 10.13% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR + 4.85% (5.10% as of June 30, 2011).

40


Table of Contents

12. Interest Expense
          The following table is a summary of the Company’s consolidated interest expense and the amounts capitalized (in thousands):
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended,     For the Six Months Ended,  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
            As Revised             As Revised  
Real Estate and Other:
                               
Interest incurred on borrowings
  $ 16,556       20,346       34,433       40,507  
Interest capitalized
    (18 )     (114 )     (30 )     (185 )
 
                       
 
    16,538       20,232       34,403       40,322  
 
                       
Financial Services:
                               
Interest on deposits
    4,006       6,021       8,404       13,077  
Interest on advances from FHLB
    38       1       153       959  
Interest on short term borrowings
    3       7       9       15  
Interest on debentures and bonds payable
    4,080       3,922       8,088       7,744  
 
                       
 
    8,127       9,951       16,654       21,795  
 
                       
Total interest expense
  $ 24,665       30,183       51,057       62,117  
 
                       
13. Noncontrolling Interests
          The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests held by others in the Company’s subsidiaries at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
BankAtlantic Bancorp
  $ 12,008       7,823  
Bluegreen
    35,769       44,362  
Joint ventures
    25,614       26,071  
 
           
 
  $ 73,391       78,256  
 
           
          The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests (loss) earnings recognized by others with respect to the Company’s subsidiaries for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
            As Revised             As Revised  
Noncontrolling interest — Continuing Operations
                               
BankAtlantic Bancorp
  $ 12,719       (32,336 )     25       (45,355 )
Bluegreen
    4,965       7,701       6,588       7,812  
Joint ventures
    2,123       1,216       3,685       2,408  
 
                       
 
  $ 19,807       (23,419 )     10,298       (35,135 )
 
                       
 
                               
Noncontrolling interest — Discontinued Operations:
                               
Bluegreen
  $ (15,852 )     (1,800 )     (16,058 )     (3,404 )
 
                       
 
  $ (15,852 )     (1,800 )     (16,058 )     (3,404 )
 
                       
 
  $ 3,955       (25,219 )     (5,760 )     (38,539 )
 
                       

41


Table of Contents

14. Segment Reporting
          Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in assessing performance and deciding how to allocate resources. Reportable segments consist of one or more operating segments with similar economic characteristics, products and services, production processes, type of customer, distribution system or regulatory environment.
          The information provided for segment reporting is based on internal reports utilized by management of the Company and its subsidiaries. The presentation and allocation of assets and results of operations may not reflect the actual economic costs of the segments as standalone businesses. If a different basis of allocation were utilized, the relative contributions of the segments might differ but the relative trends in the segments’ operating results would, in management’s view, likely not be impacted.
          Our business activities currently consist of (i) Real Estate and Other and (ii) Financial Services. Since our acquisition of a controlling interest in Bluegreen during November 2009, we have reported the results of our business activities through six segments. Four of the segments relate to our Real Estate and Other business activities. These segments are: BFC Activities; Real Estate Operations; and Bluegreen Resorts and Bluegreen Communities, the two segments through which Bluegreen’s business was historically conducted. Our other two segments — BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company — relate to our Financial Services business activities and include BankAtlantic Bancorp’s results of operations.
          On March 24, 2011, Bluegreen announced that it had engaged advisors to explore strategic alternatives for Bluegreen Communities. In connection with that process, Bluegreen’s Board of Directors made a determination during June 2011 to seek to sell Bluegreen Communities or all or substantially all of its assets. As a consequence, it was determined that Bluegreen Communities met the criteria for classification as a discontinued operation, and it is therefore no longer included as an operating segment. Bluegreen recently entered into a non-binding letter of intent with a third party contemplating the sale of Bluegreen Communities, or a similar transaction. However, as of the date of this filing, Bluegreen had not entered into any definitive agreement or agreements with respect to the sale of Bluegreen Communities or its assets, and Bluegreen may not be successful in its efforts to consummate any such sale or sales. See Note 4 for further information regarding the classification of Bluegreen Communities as a discontinued operation and the results of discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
          The Company evaluates segment performance based on its segment net income (loss).
          The following summarizes the aggregation of the Company’s operating segments into reportable segments:
BFC Activities
          The BFC Activities segment consists of BFC operations, dividends from our investment in Benihana, and other operations of Woodbridge described below. BFC operations primarily consist of our corporate overhead and general and administrative expenses, including the expenses of Woodbridge, the financial results of a venture partnership that BFC controls and other equity investments, as well as income and expenses associated with BFC’s shared service operations which provides human resources, risk management, investor relations and executive office administration services to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen. This segment also includes investments made by our wholly owned subsidiary, BFC/CCC, Inc. (“BFC/CCC”). Woodbridge’s other operations include the activities of Pizza Fusion Holdings, Inc., a restaurant operator and franchisor engaged in the quick service and organic food industries, Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC, and certain other investments.
Real Estate Operations
          The Company’s Real Estate Operations segment is comprised of the operations of Woodbridge and the subsidiaries through which Woodbridge historically conducted its real estate business activities. It currently includes Carolina Oak, which engaged in homebuilding activities in South Carolina prior to the suspension of those activities in the fourth quarter of 2008, and Cypress Creek Holdings, LLC (“Cypress Creek Holdings”), which engages in leasing activities. The Real Estate Operations segment also includes the business activities of Core, certain subsidiaries of which were deconsolidated from our financial statements during the fourth quarter of 2010.

42


Table of Contents

Bluegreen Resorts
          Bluegreen Resorts markets, sells and manages real estate-based VOIs in resorts generally located in popular, high-volume, “drive-to” vacation destinations, which were developed or acquired by Bluegreen or developed by others. Bluegreen Resorts also earns fees from third-party resort developers and timeshare owners for providing services such as sales and marketing, mortgage servicing, construction management, title, and resort management.
          Effective January 1, 2011, Bluegreen modified its measure of segment operating profit (loss) to include certain bank-related charges, which were previously reported as corporate general and administrative expenses. In connection with this modification, presentation for prior periods have been revised to be comparable with the current period. This revision decreased Bluegreen Resorts’ segment operating profit by $0.7 million and $1.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from the amounts previously reported.
BankAtlantic
          The Company’s BankAtlantic segment consists of the banking operations of BankAtlantic. BankAtlantic activities consist of retail banking services delivered through a network of branches located in Florida.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company
          The BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company segment consists of the operations of BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company, including financing activities, capital management and costs of acquisitions.

43


Table of Contents

          The tables below set forth the Company’s segment information as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
                                                         
                                    BankAtlantic     Unallocated        
                                    Bancorp     Amounts        
    BFC     Real Estate     Bluegreen             Parent     and     Segment  
2011    Activities     Operations     Resorts     BankAtlantic     Company     Eliminations     Total  
Revenues:
                                                       
Sales of VOIs and real estate
  $             45,344                         45,344  
Other resort revenue
                17,287                         17,287  
Other revenues
    299       (34 )     18,308                   34       18,607  
Interest income
                      37,222       60       22,261       59,543  
Financial Services — non-interest income
                      60,074       (1,183 )     (415 )     58,476  
 
                                         
Total revenues
    299       (34 )     80,939       97,296       (1,123 )     21,880       199,257  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Costs and Expenses:
                                                       
Cost of sale of VOIs and real estate
                6,703                         6,703  
Cost of sales of other resort operations
                12,156                         12,156  
Interest expense
    1,511       835             4,244       3,854       14,221       24,665  
Provision for loan losses
                      10,195       514             10,709  
Selling, general and administrative
    5,212       363       39,628                   10,698       55,901  
Other expenses
                      51,890       2,507       (955 )     53,442  
 
                                         
Total costs and expenses
    6,723       1,198       58,487       66,329       6,875       23,964       163,576  
 
                                         
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
    8                         432       35       475  
Other income
    1,481       4                         (1,078 )     407  
 
                                         
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
    (4,935 )     (1,228 )     22,452       30,967       (7,566 )     (3,127 )     36,563  
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    (52 )                             6,572       6,520  
 
                                         
(Loss) income from continuing operations
    (4,883 )     (1,228 )     22,452       30,967       (7,566 )     (9,699 )     30,043  
Loss from discontinued operations
                                  (33,026 )     (33,026 )
 
                                         
Net (loss) income
  $ (4,883 )     (1,228 )     22,452       30,967       (7,566 )     (42,725 )     (2,983 )
 
                                             
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
                                            3,955       3,955  
 
                                                   
Net loss attributable to BFC
                                          $ (46,680 )     (6,938 )
 
                                                   
 
 
                                         
Total assets
  $ 71,314       25,286       825,268       3,831,471       356,709       (83,884 )     5,026,164  
 
                                         

44


Table of Contents

                                                         
                                    BankAtlantic     Unallocated        
                                    Bancorp     Amounts        
    BFC     Real Estate     Bluegreen             Parent     and     Segment  
2010    Activities     Operations     Resorts     BankAtlantic     Company     Eliminations     Total  
    (As Revised)     (As Revised)     (As Revised)                     (As Revised)     (As Revised)  
Revenues:
                                                       
Sales of VOIs and real estate
  $       2,455       59,955                         62,410  
Other resorts revenue
                16,423                         16,423  
Other real estate revenues
    482       297       12,130                   (17 )     12,892  
Interest income
                      43,271       81       23,975       67,327  
Financial Services — non-interest income
                      26,271       274       (501 )     26,044  
 
                                         
Total revenues
    482       2,752       88,508       69,542       355       23,457       185,096  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Costs and Expenses:
                                                       
Cost of sale of VOIs and real estate
          2,175       8,423                         10,598  
Cost of sales of other resort operations
                11,452                         11,452  
Interest expense
    1,643       3,150             6,263       3,660       15,467       30,183  
Provision for loan losses
                      43,634       4,919             48,553  
Selling, general and administrative
    7,141       1,802       39,194                   9,473       57,610  
Other expenses
                      59,515       3,393       (647 )     62,261  
 
                                         
Total costs and expenses
    8,784       7,127       59,069       109,412       11,972       24,293       220,657  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Loss on settlement of investment in subsidiary
    (1,135 )                                   (1,135 )
Earnings in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
    4                         237       35       276  
Other income
    1,772       708                         (1,281 )     1,199  
 
                                         
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
    (7,661 )     (3,667 )     29,439       (39,870 )     (11,380 )     (2,082 )     (35,221 )
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    (5,379 )                             9,920       4,541  
 
                                         
(Loss) income from continuing operations
    (2,282 )     (3,667 )     29,439       (39,870 )     (11,380 )     (12,002 )     (39,762 )
Loss from discontinued operations
          2,714                         (3,749 )     (1,035 )
 
                                         
Net (loss) income
  $ (2,282 )     (953 )     29,439       (39,870 )     (11,380 )     (15,751 )     (40,797 )
 
                                             
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
                                            (25,219 )     (25,219 )
 
                                                   
Net loss attributable to BFC
                                          $ 9,468       (15,578 )
 
                                                   
 
                                                       
 
                                         
Total assets
  $ 110,122       180,634       905,339       4,611,282       401,842       (52,759 )     6,156,460  
 
                                         

45


Table of Contents

The tables below set forth the Company’s segment information as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
                                                         
                                    BankAtlantic     Unallocated        
                                    Bancorp     Amounts        
    BFC     Real Estate     Bluegreen             Parent     and     Segment  
2011   Activities     Operations     Resorts     BankAtlantic     Company     Eliminations     Total  
Revenues:
                                                       
Sales of VOIs and real estate
  $             81,678                         81,678  
Other resort revenue
                34,487                         34,487  
Other revenues
    570       (17 )     29,072                   17       29,642  
Interest income
                      76,642       149       45,249       122,040  
Financial Services — non-interest income
                      82,987       (974 )     (811 )     81,202  
 
                                         
Total revenues
    570       (17 )     145,237       159,629       (825 )     44,455       349,049  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Costs and Expenses:
                                                       
Cost of sale of VOIs and real estate
                13,928                         13,928  
Cost of sales of other resort operations
                25,237                         25,237  
Interest expense
    2,872       2,237             8,960       7,638       29,350       51,057  
Provision for loan losses
                      38,027       494             38,521  
Selling, general and administrative
    10,588       852       72,157                   21,695       105,292  
Other expenses
                      98,044       5,939       (1,241 )     102,742  
 
                                         
Total costs and expenses
    13,460       3,089       111,322       145,031       14,071       49,804       336,777  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary
          11,305                               11,305  
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
    1,369                         813       70       2,252  
Other income
    2,799       4                         (1,822 )     981  
 
                                         
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
    (8,722 )     8,203       33,915       14,598       (14,083 )     (7,101 )     26,810  
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    (196 )                 1             8,860       8,665  
 
                                         
(Loss) income from continuing operations
    (8,526 )     8,203       33,915       14,597       (14,083 )     (15,961 )     18,145  
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
                                  (33,454 )     (33,454 )
 
                                         
Net (loss) income
  $ (8,526 )     8,203       33,915       14,597       (14,083 )     (49,415 )     (15,309 )
 
                                             
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
                                            (5,760 )     (5,760 )
 
                                                     
Net loss attributable to BFC
                                          $ (43,655 )     (9,549 )
 
                                                   

46


Table of Contents

                                                         
                                            Unallocated        
                                    BankAtlantic     Amounts        
    BFC     Real Estate     Bluegreen             Bancorp     and     Segment  
    Activities     Operations     Resorts             Parent     Eliminations     Total  
2010   (As Revised)     (As Revised)     (As Revised)     BankAtlantic     Company     (As Revised)     (As Revised)  
Revenues:
                                                       
Sales of VOIs and real estate
  $       2,455       84,561                         87,016  
Other resort revenue
                32,093                         32,093  
Other real estate revenues
    869       934       22,310                   (34 )     24,079  
Interest income
                      90,986       159       48,483       139,628  
Financial Services — non-interest income
                      54,528       543       (937 )     54,134  
 
                                         
Total revenues
    869       3,389       138,964       145,514       702       47,512       336,950  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Costs and Expenses:
                                                       
Cost of sale of VOIs and real estate
          2,175       11,158                         13,333  
Cost of sales of other resort operations
                23,395                         23,395  
Interest expense
    3,481       6,460             14,519       7,223       30,434       62,117  
Provision for loan losses
                      75,668       3,640             79,308  
Selling, general and administrative
    13,628       4,461       68,528                   22,473       109,090  
Other expenses
                      112,236       5,037       (1,002 )     116,271  
 
                                         
Total costs and expenses
    17,109       13,096       103,081       202,423       15,900       51,905       403,514  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Loss on settlement of investment in subsidiary
    (1,135 )                                   (1,135 )
Earnings in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
    (27 )                       426       70       469  
Other income
    3,166       761                               (2,290 )     1,637  
 
                                         
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
    (14,236 )     (8,946 )     35,883       (56,909 )     (14,772 )     (6,613 )     (65,593 )
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    (6,546 )                 90             10,134       3,678  
 
                                         
(Loss) income from continuing operations
    (7,690 )     (8,946 )     35,883       (56,999 )     (14,772 )     (16,747 )     (69,271 )
Loss from discontinued operations
          2,465                         (7,091 )     (4,626 )
 
                                                     
 
                                         
Net (loss) income
  $ (7,690 )     (6,481 )     35,883       (56,999 )     (14,772 )     (23,838 )     (73,897 )
 
                                             
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
                                            (38,539 )     (38,539 )
 
                                                   
Net loss attributable to BFC
                                          $ 14,701       (35,358 )
 
                                                   

47


Table of Contents

15. Commitments and Contingencies
BFC
          At June 30, 2009, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC had a 10% interest in a limited partnership as a non-managing general partner. The partnership owns an office building located in Boca Raton, Florida. In connection with the purchase of the office building in March 2006, BFC/CCC guaranteed repayment of a portion of the non-recourse loan on the property on a joint and several basis with the managing general partner. BFC/CCC’s maximum exposure under this guarantee agreement was $2.0 million (which was shared on a joint and several basis with the managing general partner). In July 2009, BFC/CCC’s wholly-owned subsidiary withdrew as a partner of the limited partnership and transferred its 10% interest to an unaffiliated partner. In return, the partner to whom this interest was assigned agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the release of BFC/CCC from the guarantee. The partner was unable to secure such a release and that partner has agreed to indemnify BFC/CCC’s wholly-owned subsidiary for any losses that may arise under the guarantee after the date of the assignment. No amounts are recorded in our financial statements at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010 for this joint venture.
          A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC had a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owned two commercial properties in Hillsborough County, Florida which served as collateral for an approximately $26.0 million loan to the limited liability company. In connection with the purchase of the commercial properties in November 2006, BFC and the unaffiliated member of the limited liability company each guaranteed the payment of up to a maximum of $5.0 million for certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that were not related to the financial performance of the properties. BFC and the unaffiliated member also entered into a cross indemnification agreement which limited BFC’s obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates. On March 25, 2011, the limited liability company reached a settlement with its lender, pursuant to which it conveyed the commercial properties securing the loan via a deed in lieu of foreclosure. BFC and BFC/CCC’s wholly-owned subsidiary were released from all obligations and guarantees related to the two commercial properties. During the first quarter of 2011, BFC recognized the negative basis of its investment of approximately $1.3 million which is included in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates.
          A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 50% limited partner interest in a limited partnership that has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owns an office building in Tampa, Florida. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying amount of this investment was approximately $286,000 and $282,000, respectively, which is included in investments in unconsolidated affiliates in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. In connection with the purchase of the office building by the limited liability company in June 2007, BFC guaranteed the payment of certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are not related to the financial performance of the asset up to a maximum of $15.0 million, or $25.0 million in the event of any petition or involuntary proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or similar state insolvency laws or in the event of any transfer of interests not in accordance with the loan documents. BFC and the unaffiliated members also entered into a cross indemnification agreement which limits BFC’s obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates. No amounts are recorded in the Company’s financial statements at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010 for the obligations associated with this guarantee based on the potential indemnification by unaffiliated members and the limit of the specific obligations to non-financial matters.
          Based on the current accounting guidance associated with the consolidation of variable interest entities implemented on January 1, 2010, we are not deemed the primary beneficiaries in connection with the above mentioned BFC/CCC investments and do not consolidate these entities into our financial statements. We do not have the power to direct the activities that can significantly impact the performance of these entities.
Woodbridge
          Levitt and Sons, Woodbridge’s former wholly-owned homebuilding subsidiary, had approximately $33.3 million of surety bonds related to its ongoing projects at November 9, 2007, the date on which Levitt and Sons and substantially all of its subsidiaries filed voluntary bankruptcy petitions (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). In the event that these obligations are drawn and paid by the surety, Woodbridge could be responsible for up to $7.6 million plus costs and expenses in accordance with the surety indemnity agreements executed by Woodbridge. At both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Woodbridge had $490,000 in surety bond accruals related to certain bonds where management believes it to be probable that Woodbridge will be required to reimburse the surety under applicable indemnity agreements. It is unclear whether and to what extent the remaining outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be responsible for additional amounts beyond the

48


Table of Contents

previous accrued amount. Woodbridge will not receive any repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery of any amounts it may be required to pay. In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require Woodbridge to post collateral against a portion of surety bond exposure in connection with demands made by a municipality. Based on claims by the municipality on the bonds, the surety requested that Woodbridge post a $4.0 million escrow deposit while the matter was being litigated with the municipality. While Woodbridge did not believe that the municipality had the right to demand payment under the bonds, Woodbridge complied with that request. In August 2010, a motion for summary judgment was entered in Woodbridge’s favor terminating any obligations under the bonds. The municipality has appealed the decision.
          On February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court presiding over the Chapter 11 Cases entered an order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors. That order also approved the settlement pursuant to the settlement agreement that was entered into with the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Settlement Agreement”). No appeal or rehearing of the Bankruptcy Court’s order was filed by any party, and the settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time payment was made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement as amended. Under cost method accounting, the cost of settlement and the related $52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was determined as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant to the settlement agreement) was recognized into income in the first quarter of 2009, resulting in a $40.4 million gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, we agreed to share a percentage of any tax refund attributable to periods prior to the bankruptcy with the Debtors Estate. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we accrued approximately $10.7 million in connection with the portion of the tax refund which may be payable to the Debtors Estate pursuant to the settlement agreement. As a result, the gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2009 was reduced to $29.7 million. Additionally, in the second quarter of 2010, we increased the $10.7 million accrual by approximately $1.0 million, representing a portion of an additional tax refund which we expect to receive due to a recent change in Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) guidance that will likely be required to be paid to the Debtors Estate pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. We have placed into escrow approximately $8.4 million, which represents the portion of the tax refund received to date from the Internal Revenue Service that would be payable to the Debtors Estate under the Settlement Agreement.
          See also Note 2 above for a discussion of the pending appraisal rights litigation relating to the merger between BFC and Woodbridge.
Bluegreen
          In the ordinary course of its business, Bluegreen becomes subject to claims or proceedings from time to time relating to the purchase, subdivision, sale or financing of real estate (including VOIs). Additionally, from time to time, Bluegreen becomes involved in disputes with existing and former employees, vendors, taxing jurisdictions and various other parties. From time to time in the ordinary course of business, Bluegreen also receives individual consumer complaints, as well as complaints received through regulatory and consumer agencies, including Offices of State Attorney Generals. We take these matters seriously and attempt to resolve any such issues as they arise. Unless otherwise described below, Bluegreen believes that these claims are routine litigation incidental to its business.
Tennessee Tax Audit
          In 2005, the State of Tennessee Audit Division (the “Division”) audited certain subsidiaries within Bluegreen Resorts for the period from December 1, 2001 through December 31, 2004. On September 23, 2006, the Division issued a notice of assessment for approximately $652,000 of accommodations tax based on the use of Bluegreen Vacation Club accommodations by Bluegreen Vacation Club members who became members through the purchase of non-Tennessee property. Bluegreen believes the attempt to impose such a tax is contrary to Tennessee law and have vigorously opposed such assessment by the Division. An informal conference was held in December 2007 to discuss this matter with representatives of the Division. No formal resolution of the issue was reached during the conference. By letter dated May 25, 2011, the State of Tennessee Department of Revenue issued a decision in which it held that two of the three types of transactions in question were taxable. The Department of Revenue confirmed that Bluegreen had already remitted the proper amount of sales tax due on one of the two types of taxable transactions, but have taken the position that Bluegreen owed a total of $731,000 in taxes and interest based on the second type of transaction. On August 1, 2011 Bluegreen filed suit in the Chancery Court of Davidson County, Tennessee for the purpose of invalidating and setting aside the tax assessment made against Bluegreen by the Department of Revenue.

49


Table of Contents

Destin, Florida Deposit Dispute Lawsuit
          In Case No. 2006-Ca-3374, styled Joseph M. Scheyd, Jr., P.A. vs. Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc.; Hubert A. Laird; and MSB of Destin, Inc.,in the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit in and for Okaloosa County, Florida, during 2006, Joseph M. Scheyd, Jr., P.A., as escrow agent, brought an interpleader action seeking a determination as to whether Bluegreen, as purchaser, or Hubert A. Laird and MSB of Destin, Inc., as seller, were entitled to the $1.4 million escrow deposit being maintained with the escrow agent pursuant to a purchase and sale contract for real property located in Destin, Florida. Bluegreen maintains its decision not to close on the purchase of the property was proper under the terms of the purchase and sale contract and therefore are entitled to a return of the full escrow deposit. On June 1, 2011, the trial court made a finding that Bluegreen breached the purchase and sale contract and that the plaintiff was entitled to the escrow deposit and all accrued interest. Bluegreen has filed a notice of appeal with the First District Court of Appeal seeking to appeal the result of the trial court’s decision. In connection with the appeal, the escrow deposit and all accrued interest have been placed in the appropriate Court registry pending the outcome of the appeal.
Inquiry into Consumer Matters by the Office of the Florida Attorney General
          The Office of the Attorney General for the State of Florida (the “AGSF”) has advised Bluegreen that it has accumulated a number of consumer complaints since 2005 against Bluegreen and/or its affiliates related to timeshare sales and marketing, and has requested that Bluegreen propose a resolution on a collective basis of any outstanding complaints. The AGSF has also requested that Bluegreen enter into a written agreement in which to establish a process and timeframe for determining consumer eligibility for relief (including, where applicable, monetary restitution). Bluegreen has determined that many of these complaints were previously addressed and/or resolved. Bluegreen is cooperating with the State and do not believe this matter will have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition or on our sales and marketing activities in Florida.
          The matters described below relate to the Bluegreen Communities business, which is reported as a discontinued operation.
Mountain Lakes Mineral Rights
          Bluegreen Southwest One, L.P. (“Southwest”), a subsidiary of Bluegreen Corporation, is the developer of the Mountain Lakes subdivision in Texas. In Case No. 28006, styled Betty Yvon Lesley et a1. v. Bluff Dale Development Corporation, Bluegreen Southwest One. L.P. et al., in the 266th Judicial District Court, Erath County, Texas, the plaintiffs filed a declaratory judgment action against Southwest seeking to develop their reserved mineral interests in, on and under the Mountain Lakes subdivision. The plaintiffs’ claims are based on property law, oil and gas law, contract and tort theories. The property owners association and some of the individual landowners have filed cross actions against Bluegreen, Southwest and individual directors of the property owners association related to the mineral rights and certain amenities in the subdivision as described below. On January 17, 2007, the court ruled that the restrictions placed on the development that prohibited oil and gas production and development were invalid and not enforceable as a matter of law, that such restrictions did not prohibit the development of the plaintiffs’ prior reserved mineral interests and that Southwest breached its duty to lease the minerals to third parties for development. The court further ruled that Southwest was the sole holder of the right to lease the minerals to third parties. The order granting the plaintiffs’ motion was severed into Case No. 28769, styled Betty Yvon Lesley et a1. v. Bluff Dale Development Corporation, Bluegreen Southwest One. L.P. et al. in the 266th Judicial District Court, Erath County, Texas. Southwest appealed the trial court’s ruling. On January 22, 2009, in Bluegreen Southwest One, L.P. et al. v. Betty Yvon Lesley et al., in the 11th Court of Appeals, Eastland, Texas, the Appellate Court reversed the trial court’s decision and ruled in Southwest’s favor and determined that all executive rights were owned by Southwest and then transferred to the individual property owners in connection with the sales of land. All property owner claims were decided in favor of Southwest. It was also decided that Southwest did not breach a fiduciary duty to the plaintiffs as an executive rights holder. On May 14, 2009, the plaintiffs filed an appeal with the Texas Supreme Court asking the Court to reverse the Appellate Court’s decision in favor of Southwest. On September 15, 2010 the Court heard oral arguments on whether to reverse or affirm the Appellate Court’s decision. No information is available as to when the Texas Supreme Court will render a decision on the appeal.
Schawrz, et al. Lawsuit Regarding Community Amenities
          On September 18, 2008, in Case No. 2008-5U-CV-1358-WI, styled Paul A. Schwarz and Barbara S. Schwarz v. Bluegreen Communities of Georgia, LLC and Bluegreen Corporation, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Brunswick Division, the plaintiffs brought suit alleging fraud and

50


Table of Contents

misrepresentation with regards to the construction of a marina at the Sanctuary Cove subdivision located in Camden County, Georgia. The plaintiff subsequently withdrew the fraud and misrepresentation counts and filed a count alleging violation of racketeering laws. On January 25, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a second complaint seeking approval to proceed with the lawsuit as a class action on behalf of more than 100 persons alleged to have been harmed by the alleged activities in a similar manner. No decision has yet been made by the Court as to whether a class will be certified. Bluegreen denies the allegations and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.
Community Cable Service, LLC Lawsuit
          On June 3, 2010, in Case No. 16-2009-CA-008028, styled Community Cable Service, LLC v. Bluegreen Communities of Georgia, LLC and Sanctuary Cove at St. Andrews Sound Community Association, Inc., a/k/a Sanctuary Cove Home Developers Association, Inc., in the Circuit Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit in and for Duval County, Florida, the plaintiffs filed suit alleging breach by Bluegreen Communities of Georgia and the community association of a bulk cable TV services contract at Bluegreen’s Communities Sanctuary Cove single family residential community being developed in Waverly, Georgia. In its complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that unpaid bulk cable fees are due from the defendants, and that the non-payment of fees will continue to accrue on a monthly basis. Bluegreen and the community association have responded that the plaintiffs breached the parties’ contract. The case went to mediation on September 20, 2010, but no resolution was reached. Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment which have been set for hearing on August 11, 2011. A trial date, if necessary, will be set after the Court rules on the parties’ summary judgment motion.
BankAtlantic Bancorp
          Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk were (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Commitments to sell fixed rate residential loans
  $ 3,640       14,408  
Commitments to originate loans held for sale
    3,128       12,571  
Commitments to originate loans held to maturity
    13,567       10,693  
Commitments to purchase residential loans
    5,395       2,590  
Commitments to extend credit, including the undisbursed portion of loans in process
    353,382       357,730  
Standby letters of credit
    7,301       9,804  
Commercial lines of credit
    85,173       77,144  
          Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by BankAtlantic to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. BankAtlantic’s standby letters of credit are generally issued to customers in the construction industry guaranteeing project performance. These types of standby letters of credit had a maximum exposure of $6.4 million at June 30, 2011. BankAtlantic also issues standby letters of credit to commercial lending customers guaranteeing the payment of goods and services. These types of standby letters of credit had a maximum exposure of $0.9 million at June 30, 2011. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements and have maturities of one year or less. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. BankAtlantic may hold certificates of deposit and residential and commercial liens as collateral for such commitments. Included in other liabilities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $35,000 and $34,000, respectively, of unearned guarantee fees. There were no obligations associated with these guarantees recorded in the financial statements.
          BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries are parties to lawsuits as plaintiff or defendant involving its bank operations, lending and tax certificates. Although BankAtlantic Bancorp believes it has meritorious defenses in all current legal actions, the outcome of litigation and regulatory matters and timing of ultimate resolution are inherently difficult to predict and uncertain.
          Reserves are accrued for matters in which it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. These accrual amounts as of June 30, 2011 are not material to BankAtlantic Bancorp’s financial statements. The actual costs of resolving these legal claims may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for these claims.
          A range of reasonably possible losses is estimated for matters in which it is reasonably possible that a loss has been incurred or that a loss is probable but not reasonably estimable. Management of BankAtlantic Bancorp

51


Table of Contents

currently estimates the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses as $6.3 million to $18.3 million in excess of the accrued liability relating to these legal matters. This estimated range of reasonably possible losses represents the estimated possible losses over the life of such legal matters, which may span a currently indeterminable number of years, and is based on information currently available. The matters underlying the estimated range will change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly from this estimate. Those matters for which a reasonable estimate is not possible are not included within this estimated range and, therefore, this estimated range does not represent BankAtlantic Bancorp’s maximum loss exposure.
          In certain matters BankAtlantic Bancorp is unable to estimate the loss or reasonable range of loss until additional developments in the case provide information sufficient to support an assessment of the loss or range of loss. Frequently in these matters the claims are broad and the plaintiffs have not quantified or factually supported the claim.
          BankAtlantic Bancorp believes that liabilities arising from litigation and regulatory matters, discussed below, in excess of the amounts currently accrued, if any, will not have a material impact to BankAtlantic Bancorp’s financial statements. However, due to the significant uncertainties involved in these legal matters, BankAtlantic Bancorp may incur losses in excess of accrued amounts and an adverse outcome in these matters could be material to BankAtlantic Bancorp’s financial statements.
          The following is a description of the ongoing litigation and regulatory matters:
Class action securities litigation
          In October 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp and current or former officers of BankAtlantic Bancorp were named in a lawsuit which alleged that during the period of November 9, 2005 through October 25, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp and the named officers knowingly and/or recklessly made misrepresentations of material fact regarding BankAtlantic and specifically BankAtlantic’s loan portfolio and allowance for loan losses. The Complaint asserted claims for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 and sought unspecified damages. On November 18, 2010, a jury returned a verdict awarding $2.41 per share to shareholders who purchased shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock during the period of April 26, 2007 to October 26, 2007 who retained those shares until the end of the period. The jury rejected the plaintiffs’ claim for the six month period from October 19, 2006 to April 25, 2007. Prior to the beginning of the trial, the plaintiffs abandoned any claim for any prior period. On April 25, 2011, the Court granted defendants’ post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law and vacated the jury verdict, resulting in a judgment in favor of all defendants on all claims. The plaintiffs have appealed the Court’s order setting aside the jury verdict.
          In July 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp, certain officers and Directors were named in a lawsuit which alleged that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties by engaging in certain lending practices with respect to BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Commercial Real Estate Loan Portfolio. The Complaint further alleged that BankAtlantic Bancorp’s public filings and statements did not fully disclose the risks associated with the Commercial Real Estate Loan Portfolio and seeks damages on behalf of BankAtlantic Bancorp. In July 2011, the case was dismissed and the parties exchanged mutual releases and neither the individual defendants nor BankAtlantic Bancorp will make any monetary payments.
Class Action Overdraft Processing Litigation
          In November 2010, the two pending class action complaints against BankAtlantic associated with overdraft fees were consolidated. The Complaint, which asserts claims for breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, alleges that BankAtlantic improperly re-sequenced debit card transactions from largest to smallest, improperly assessed overdraft fees on positive balances, and improperly imposed sustained overdraft fees on customers. BankAtlantic has filed a motion to dismiss which is pending with the Court.

52


Table of Contents

Office of Thrift Supervision Overdraft Processing Examination
          As previously disclosed, the Office of Thrift Supervision advised BankAtlantic that it had determined that BankAtlantic had engaged in deceptive and unfair practices in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act relating to certain of BankAtlantic’s deposit-related products. On June 2, 2011, the OTS concluded that BankAtlantic engaged in certain deceptive and unfair practices in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and OTS regulations, and requested that BankAtlantic submit a restitution plan for OTS’s consideration. The OTS also advised BankAtlantic that BankAtlantic could be subject to civil money penalties. BankAtlantic believes it has complied with all applicable laws and OTS guidelines and on July 5, 2011, BankAtlantic filed an appeal of the OTS positions. That appeal is now before the OCC which will review the issues under its process and guidelines.
Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation
          BankAtlantic Bancorp has received a notice of investigation from the Securities and Exchange Commission, (“SEC”) Miami Regional Office and subpoenas for information. The subpoenas requested a broad range of documents relating to, among other matters, recent and pending litigation to which BankAtlantic Bancorp is or was a party, certain of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s non-performing, non-accrual and charged-off loans, BankAtlantic Bancorp’s cost saving measures, loan classifications, BankAtlantic Bancorp’s asset workout subsidiary, and the recent Orders with the OTS entered into by BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and BankAtlantic. Various current and former employees also received subpoenas for documents and testimony.
          The Miami regional office staff of the SEC has indicated that it is recommending that the SEC bring a civil action against BankAtlantic Bancorp alleging that BankAtlantic Bancorp violated certain provisions of federal securities laws, including Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. BankAtlantic Bancorp has also been informed that its chief executive officer received a similar communication. In communications between BankAtlantic Bancorp’s counsel and the Miami regional office staff, BankAtlantic Bancorp has learned that the basis for the recommended actions were many of the same arguments brought in the private class action securities litigation recently concluded at the district court level in favor of BankAtlantic Bancorp and the individual defendants. In addition, the Miami regional office staff raised issues relating to the classification and valuation of certain loans included in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s financial information for the last quarter of 2007 and in its annual report on Form 10-K for the 2007 fiscal year. BankAtlantic Bancorp and its CEO responded to the issues raised by the Miami regional office staff in June 2011. If litigation is brought, the SEC may seek remedies including an injunction against future violations of federal securities laws, civil money penalties and an officer and director bar. BankAtlantic Bancorp believes that it has fulfilled all of its obligations under securities laws and, if such actions are brought by the SEC against BankAtlantic Bancorp and/or any of its officers, such actions would be vigorously defended.
Concentration of Credit Risk
          BankAtlantic has a high concentration of its consumer home equity and commercial loans in the State of Florida. Real estate values and general economic conditions have significantly deteriorated since the origination dates of these loans. If market conditions in Florida do not improve or deteriorate further, BankAtlantic may be exposed to significant credit losses in these loan portfolios.
          BankAtlantic purchases residential loans located throughout the country. The majority of these residential loans are jumbo residential loans. A jumbo loan has a principal amount above the industry-standard definition of conventional conforming loan limits. These loans could potentially have outstanding loan balances significantly higher than related collateral values in distressed areas of the country as a result of the decline in real estate values in residential housing markets. Also included in this purchased residential loan portfolio are interest-only loans. The structure of these loans results in possible increases in a borrower’s loan payments when the contractually required repayments change due to interest rate movement and the required amortization of the principal amount. These payment increases could affect a borrower’s ability to meet the debt service on or repay the loan and lead to increased defaults and losses. At June 30, 2011, BankAtlantic’s residential loan portfolio included $454.5 million of interest-only loans, which represents 42.8% of the residential loan portfolio Interest-only residential loans scheduled to become fully amortizing during the six months ended December 31, 2011 and during the year ended December 31, 2012 total $24.7 million and $52.1 million, respectively. If market conditions in the areas where the collateral for BankAtlantic’s residential loans is located do not improve or deteriorate further, or the borrowers are not in a position to make the increased payments due under the terms of their loans, BankAtlantic may be exposed to additional losses in this portfolio.

53


Table of Contents

16. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
     BFC is the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen. Woodbridge Holdings Corporation became a wholly owned subsidiary of BFC upon consummation of the merger between Woodbridge and BFC on September 21, 2009. Prior to the merger, BFC held an approximately 59% voting interest in Woodbridge. BFC also has a direct non-controlling interest in Benihana. Shares of BFC’s Class A and Class B Common Stock representing a majority of BFC’s total voting power are owned or controlled by the Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Alan B. Levan, and by the Company’s Vice Chairman, John E. Abdo, both of whom are also directors of Bluegreen and Benihana, and executive officers and directors of BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic. In addition, Jarett S. Levan, the son of Alan B. Levan, is a director and executive officer of the Company, BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic.
     The following table presents related party transactions relating to the shared service arrangements between BFC, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. All amounts were eliminated in consolidation.
                             
                BankAtlantic    
        BFC   Bancorp   Bluegreen
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011                
Shared service income (expense)
  (a)   $ 482       (381 )     (101 )
Facilities cost and information technology
  (b)   $ (116 )     103       13  
 
                           
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
                           
Shared service income (expense)
  (a)   $ 675       (550 )     (125 )
Facilities cost and information technology
  (b)   $ (141 )     127       14  
 
                           
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
                           
Shared service income (expense)
  (a)   $ 863       (672 )     (191 )
Facilities cost and information technology
  (b)   $ (227 )     202       25  
 
                           
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
                           
Shared service income (expense)
  (a)   $ 1,269       (1,042 )     (227 )
Facilities cost and information technology
  (b)   $ (280 )     253       27  
 
(a)   Pursuant to the terms of shared service agreements, subsidiaries of BFC provide human resources, risk management, investor relations, executive office administration and other services to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen. The costs of shared services are allocated based upon the usage of the respective services.
 
(b)   As part of the shared service arrangement, BFC pays BankAtlantic and Bluegreen for office facilities cost relating to BFC and its shared service operations. BFC also pays BankAtlantic for information technology related services pursuant to a separate agreement. For information technology related services, BFC paid BankAtlantic approximately $36,000 and $45,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $52,000 and $90,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
          As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had cash and cash equivalents accounts at BankAtlantic with balances of approximately $943,000 million and $1.8 million, respectively. These accounts were on the same general terms as deposits made by unaffiliated third parties. The Company recognized nominal interest income in connection with these funds held at BankAtlantic during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
          In June 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic entered into a real estate advisory service agreement with BFC for assistance relating to the work-out of loans and the sale of real estate owned. Under the terms of the agreement, BFC receives a monthly fee of $12,500 from each of BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp and, if BFC’s efforts result in net recoveries of any non-performing loan or the sale of real estate owned, BFC will receive a fee equal to 1% of the net value recovered. During each of the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, BFC recognized an aggregate of $0.2 million of real estate advisory service fees under this agreement. Real estate advisory service fees during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

54


Table of Contents

          During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Bluegreen reimbursed the Company approximately $0.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively, for certain expenses incurred in assisting Bluegreen in its efforts to explore potential additional sources of liquidity. Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Bluegreen paid Snapper Creek, a subsidiary of the Company, approximately $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, in consideration for its provision of a variety of management advisory services. We also have an agreement with Bluegreen relating to the maintenance of different independent registered public accounting firms. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen reimbursed us for $0.5 million of fees related to certain procedures performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, at Bluegreen as part of its 2010 audit of our financial statements.
          In 2009, Bluegreen entered into a land lease with Benihana, which constructed and operates a restaurant at one of Bluegreen’s resort properties. Bluegreen receives lease payments from Benihana of approximately $0.1 million annually.
          BankAtlantic Bancorp in prior periods issued options to acquire shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock to employees of BFC. Additionally, employees of BankAtlantic Bancorp have transferred to affiliate companies and BankAtlantic Bancorp has elected, in accordance with the terms of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s stock option plans, not to cancel the stock options held by those former employees. BankAtlantic Bancorp also issues options and restricted stock awards to BFC employees that perform services for BankAtlantic Bancorp. Expenses relating to all options and restricted stock awards granted by BankAtlantic Bancorp to BFC employees was approximately $16,000 and $32,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $25,000 and $46,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
          Outstanding options to purchase BankAtlantic Bancorp stock and non-vested restricted BankAtlantic Bancorp stock held by BFC employees consisted of the following as of June 30, 2011:
                 
    BankAtlantic Bancorp        
    Class A     Weighted  
    Common     Average  
    Stock     Price  
Options outstanding
    35,003     $ 62.21  
Non-vested restricted stock
    56,250        
          Certain of the Company’s affiliates, including its executive officers, have independently made investments with their own funds in both public and private entities that the Company sponsored in 2001 and in which it holds investments.
          Florida Partners Corporation owns 1,270,294 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and 133,314 shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock. Alan B. Levan may be deemed to be the controlling shareholder of Florida Partners Corporation, and is also a member of its Board of Directors.

55


Table of Contents

17. Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
     The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted loss per common share attributable to the Company (in thousands, except per share data):
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
            (As Revised)             (As Revised)  
Basic earnings (loss) per common share Numerator:
                               
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  $ 30,043       (39,762 )     18,145       (69,271 )
Less: Noncontrolling interests income (loss) from continuing operations
    19,807       (23,419 )     10,298       (35,135 )
 
                       
Income (loss) attributable to BFC
    10,236       (16,343 )     7,847       (34,136 )
Preferred stock dividends
    (187 )     (187 )     (375 )     (375 )
 
                       
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to BFC
    10,049       (16,530 )     7,472       (34,511 )
 
                       
 
                               
Loss from discontinued operations
    (33,026 )     (1,035 )     (33,454 )     (4,626 )
Less: Noncontrolling interests loss from discontinued operations
    (15,852 )     (1,800 )     (16,058 )     (3,404 )
 
                       
(Loss) income from discontinued operations attributable to BFC
    (17,174 )     765       (17,396 )     (1,222 )
 
                       
 
                               
Net loss allocable to common shareholders
  $ (7,125 )     (15,765 )     (9,924 )     (35,733 )
 
                       
 
                               
Denominator:
                               
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
    75,381       75,379       75,381       75,378  
 
                       
 
                               
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
                               
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
  $ 0.13       (0.22 )     0.10       (0.46 )
(Loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations
    (0.23 )     0.01       (0.23 )     (0.02 )
 
                       
Basic loss per share
  $ (0.10 )     (0.21 )     (0.13 )     (0.48 )
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
                               
Numerator:
                               
Income (loss) allocable to common stock
  $ 10,049       (16,530 )     7,472       (34,511 )
(Loss) income from discontinued operations allocable to common stock
    (17,174 )     765       (17,396 )     (1,222 )
 
                       
Net loss allocable to common stock
  $ (7,125 )     (15,765 )     (9,924 )     (35,733 )
 
                       
 
                               
Denominator
                               
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding
    75,381       75,379       75,381       75,378  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted (loss) earnings per share
                               
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
  $ 0.13       (0.22 )     0.10       (0.46 )
(Loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations
    (0.23 )     0.01       (0.23 )     (0.02 )
 
                       
Diluted loss per share
  $ (0.10 )     (0.21 )     (0.13 )     (0.48 )
 
                       
          During each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2011options to acquire 2,297,858 shares of Class A Common Stock were anti-dilutive and not included in the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share. During each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, options to acquire 2,494,779 shares of Class A Common Stock were anti-dilutive and not included in the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share.

56


Table of Contents

18. Parent Company Financial Information
          BFC’s parent company accounting policies are generally the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Company’s investments in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen and other consolidated entities are presented in the parent company financial statements as if accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
          BFC’s parent company unaudited condensed statements of financial condition at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, unaudited condensed statements of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and unaudited condensed statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are shown below:
Parent Company Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
(In thousands)
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
ASSETS
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 3,997       4,958  
Securities available for sale
    16,613       38,829  
Investment in Woodbridge Holdings, LLC
    108,037       115,999  
Investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
    10,132       2,377  
Investment in and advances in other subsidiaries
    1,770       113  
Notes receivable due from Woodbridge Holdings, LLC
    7,254       2,012  
Other assets
    1,958       1,444  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 149,761       165,732  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
               
Advances from wholly owned subsidiaries
  $ 947       942  
Other liabilities
    10,894       10,889  
 
           
Total liabilities
    11,841       11,831  
 
           
 
               
Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock
    11,029       11,029  
 
               
Shareholders’ equity
    126,891       142,872  
 
           
Total liabilities and Equity
  $ 149,761       165,732  
 
           
Parent Company Condensed Statements of Operations
(In thousands)
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
            (As Revised)             (As Revised)  
Revenues
  $ 696       542       1,113       805  
Expenses
    1,940       2,632       3,520       4,546  
 
                       
(Loss) before earnings (loss) from subsidiaries
    (1,244 )     (2,090 )     (2,407 )     (3,741 )
Equity in earnings (loss) in Woodbridge Holdings, LLC
    785       4,738       8,341       (4,104 )
Equity in earnings (loss) in BankAtlantic Bancorp
    10,748       (19,237 )     420       (27,033 )
Equity in (loss) earnings in other subsidiaries
    (53 )     316       1,493       (157 )
 
                       
Income (loss) before income taxes
    10,236       (16,273 )     7,847       (35,035 )
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
          70             (899 )
 
                       
Income (loss) from continuing operations
    10,236       (16,343 )     7,847       (34,136 )
Equity in earnings (loss) in subsidiaries’ discontinued operations
    (17,174 )     765       (17,396 )     (1,222 )
 
                       
Net loss
    (6,938 )     (15,578 )     (9,549 )     (35,358 )
5% Preferred Stock dividends
    (187 )     (187 )     (375 )     (375 )
 
                           
 
                       
Net loss allocable to common stock
  $ (7,125 )     (15,765 )     (9,924 )     (35,733 )
 
                       

57


Table of Contents

Parent Company Statements of Cash Flow
(In thousands)
                 
    For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
            (As Revised)  
Operating Activities:
               
Net cash used in operating activities
  $ (8,241 )     (4,416 )
 
           
 
               
Investing Activities:
               
Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale
    8,405       2,499  
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale
    19,093       11,546  
Distribution from subsidiaries
    91       45,085  
Purchase of securities
    (9,934 )     (35,011 )
Acquisition of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A shares
    (10,000 )     (7,046 )
Increase in notes receivable
          (7,954 )
 
           
Net cash provided by investing activities
    7,655       9,119  
 
           
 
               
Financing Activities:
               
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock upon exercise of stock option
          2  
Preferred stock dividends paid
    (375 )     (375 )
 
           
Net cash used in financing activities
    (375 )     (373 )
 
           
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
    (961 )     4,330  
Cash at beginning of period
    4,958       1,308  
 
           
Cash at end of period
  $ 3,997       5,638  
 
           
 
               
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities
               
(Decrease) increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of income taxes
  $ (5,287 )     1,263  
Net increase in shareholders’ equity from the effect of subsidiaries’ capital transactions, net of income taxes
    1,088       1,249  
Net decrease in shareholders’ equity resulting from cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
          (1,496 )
          At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, securities available for sale included readily marketable securities, as well as our investment in Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock. See Note 6 for additional information about our Benihana investments.
          Approximately $4.7 million of the amounts set forth as other liabilities at each of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 represents amounts due in connection with the settlement of a class action litigation that arose in connection with exchange transactions that BFC entered into in 1989 and 1991. BFC is required to repay this obligation as settlement holders submit their claims to BFC.
19. Litigation
          There have been no material changes in the legal proceedings to which BFC and its wholly owned subsidiaries (including Woodbridge and its subsidiaries) are subject from those previously disclosed in Note 37 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and in Note 20 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2011. See Note 15 in this report for information relating to BankAtlantic Bancorp’s and Bluegreen’s material claims or proceedings.
20. New Accounting Pronouncements
          Accounting Standards Update (ASU) Number 2011-05 — Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”). ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity; requires the consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income; and requires an entity to present reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other comprehensive income to net income. ASU 2011-05 does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The effective date of ASU 2011-05 is for the first interim period beginning after December 15, 2011, and must be applied retrospectively. We believe that the adoption of this guidance will not impact the Company’s financial statements, as ASU 2011-05 only requires enhanced disclosure.
          ASU Number 2011-04 — Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”). The amendments in

58


Table of Contents

ASU 2011-04 clarify the FASB’s intent regarding the highest and best use valuation premise and also provide guidance on measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in shareholders’ equity, the treatment of premiums and discounts in fair value measurement and measuring fair value of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio. ASU 2011-04 also expands the disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements, including a requirement to disclose valuation processes and sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and categorization by level of the fair value hierarchy for items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but for which the fair value is required to be disclosed. The effective date of ASU 2011-04 is for the first interim period beginning after December 15, 2011, and early application is not permitted. The Company is evaluating the expected impact of the adoption of ASU 2011-04 on the Company’s financial statements.
     ASU Number 2011-02 — A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring (“ASU 2011-02"). During April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02 which amends guidance for evaluating whether the restructuring of a receivable by a creditor is a troubled debt restructuring (a “TDR”). ASU 2011-02 responds to concerns that creditors are inconsistently applying existing guidance for identifying TDRs. The main provision of ASU 2011-02 will require a creditor to separately conclude whether the restructuring constitutes a concession and whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties, in order to determine if a restructuring constitutes a TDR. Guidance is also provided to assist the creditor in evaluating these two criteria. ASU 2011-02 also clarifies that a creditor is precluded from using the effective interest rate test, as described in the debtors guidance on restructuring payables, when evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a TDR. ASU 2011-02 will become effective beginning with the quarterly period ending September 30, 2011. Retrospective application is required for any restructurings occurring on or after January 1, 2011 for purposes of identifying and disclosing TDRs. However, an entity should apply prospectively changes in the method used to calculate impairment on receivables. At the same time that we adopt ASU 2011-02, we will be required to disclose any activity-based information about TDRs that was previously deferred by ASU No. 2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings. The adoption of ASU 2011-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

59


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Overview
          BFC Financial Corporation (“BFC” or, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company”) is a diversified holding company whose principal holdings include a controlling interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including BankAtlantic (“BankAtlantic Bancorp”), a controlling interest in Bluegreen Corporation and its subsidiaries (“Bluegreen”), and a non-controlling interest in Benihana Inc. (“Benihana”). BFC also holds interests in other investments and subsidiaries, as described herein. As a result of its position as the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC is a “unitary savings bank holding company” and BFC was historically examined and regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”). However, effective July 21, 2011, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the OTS’ supervisory authority is now held by, and BFC is subject to the supervision of, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”).
          As of June 30, 2011, we had total consolidated assets of approximately $5.0 billion and shareholders’ equity attributable to BFC of approximately $126.9 million.
          Historically, BFC’s business strategy has been to invest in and acquire businesses in diverse industries either directly or through controlled subsidiaries. However, BFC believes that the Company’s and its shareholders’ interests are currently best served by BFC providing strategic support to its existing investments. In furtherance of this strategy, since 2009 the Company has taken several steps, including those described below, which it believes will enhance the Company’s prospects:
    During the third quarter of 2009, BFC and Woodbridge Holdings Corporation consummated their merger pursuant to which Woodbridge Holdings Corporation merged into Woodbridge Holdings, LLC (“Woodbridge”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC. Woodbridge is the parent company of Core Communities, LLC (“Core” or “Core Communities”) and Carolina Oak Homes, LLC (“Carolina Oak”).
 
    In the fourth quarter of 2009, our ownership interest in Bluegreen increased to 52% as a result of the purchase of an additional 23% interest in Bluegreen.
 
    We have also increased our investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp through our participation in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s rights offerings to its shareholders during 2009, 2010 and 2011, which in the aggregate increased our economic interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp to 53% and our voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp to 75%.
 
    We exited the land development business operated by Core Communities and sold substantially all of the associated commercial assets. Through a combination of transactions with Core’s lenders, we realized a reduction in debt of approximately $186 million in 2010 with a further reduction of approximately $27 million anticipated to occur during the fourth quarter of 2011. The Company also eliminated substantially all of the ongoing expenses associated with Core.
 
    During April 2011, Woodbridge and Carolina Oak entered into a settlement agreement to resolve the disputes and litigation between them and a note holder relating to an approximately $37.2 million loan which was collateralized by property owned by Carolina Oak. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, (i) Woodbridge paid $2.5 million to the note holder, (ii) Carolina Oak conveyed to the note holder the real property securing the loan and (iii) the note holder agreed not to pursue certain remedies, including a deficiency judgment, and after the expiration of an agreed-upon time period, to fully release Woodbridge and Carolina Oak, in each case subject to certain conditions.
 
    On May 20, 2011 and July 15, 2011, we converted an aggregate of 300,000 shares of Benihana Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Convertible Preferred Stock”) into 595,049 shares of Benihana’s Common Stock. These conversions were effected to facilitate shareholder approval of Benihana’s current proposal to reclassify each share of its Class A Common Stock into one share of its Common Stock, as described below.
          In the future, depending on market conditions and other factors considered by our Board of Directors, we may renew efforts to pursue strategic growth and consider other opportunities that could change our ownership in our affiliates or seek to make investments outside of our existing portfolio. We do not currently have pre-determined parameters as to the industry or structure of any future investment. In furtherance of our goals, we will continue to

60


Table of Contents

evaluate various financing transactions that may present themselves, including raising debt or equity as well as other alternative sources of new capital.
          As previously announced, during July 2010, Benihana announced its intention to engage in a formal review of strategic alternatives, including a possible sale of the company. In May 2011, Benihana terminated the possible sale process of the company and approved strategic alternatives, which included a proposal to reclassify each share of Benihana’s Class A Common Stock into one share of Benihana’s Common Stock, thereby eliminating Benihana’s dual-class common stock structure. The above proposal is subject to the approval of Benihana’s stockholders. BFC strongly supports Benihana’s reclassification proposal and BFC intends to vote all shares of Benihana’s stock owned or controlled by it in favor of the reclassification.
          Generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) require that BFC consolidate the financial results of the entities in which it has controlling interest. As a consequence, the assets and liabilities of all such entities are presented on a consolidated basis in BFC’s financial statements. However, except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of the consolidated entities, including BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen and Woodbridge, are not direct obligations of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC absent a dividend or distribution from those entities. The recognition by BFC of income from controlled entities is determined based on the total percent of economic ownership in those entities. At June 30, 2011, we had an approximately 52% ownership and voting interest in Bluegreen and an approximately 53% ownership interest and 75% voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp.
          Our business activities currently consist of (i) Real Estate and Other and (ii) Financial Services. Since our acquisition of a controlling interest in Bluegreen during November 2009, we have reported the results of our business activities through six segments. Four of the segments relate to our Real Estate and Other business activities. These segments are: BFC Activities; Real Estate Operations; and Bluegreen Resorts and Bluegreen Communities, the two segments through which Bluegreen’s business was historically conducted. Our other two segments — BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company — relate to our Financial Services business activities and include BankAtlantic Bancorp’s results of operations.
          On March 24, 2011, Bluegreen announced that it had engaged advisors to explore strategic alternatives for Bluegreen Communities. In connection with that process, Bluegreen’s Board of Directors made a determination during June 2011 to seek to sell Bluegreen Communities or all or substantially all of its assets. As a consequence, it was determined that Bluegreen Communities met the criteria for classification as a discontinued operation and, accordingly, Bluegreen Communities is accounted for as a discontinued operation for all periods in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Bluegreen recently entered into a non-binding letter of intent with a third party contemplating the sale of Bluegreen Communities, or a similar transaction. However, as of the date of this filing, Bluegreen had not entered into any definitive agreement or agreements with respect to the sale of Bluegreen Communities or its assets, and Bluegreen may not be successful in its efforts to consummate any such sale or sales.
          See Note 4 of the “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” for further information regarding the classification of Bluegreen Communities as a discontinued operation and the results of discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and Note 14 of the “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information about our operating segments.
Forward Looking Statements
          Except for historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this document contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. When used herein, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “may,” “intend,” “expect” and similar expressions identify certain of such forward-looking statements. Actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed, or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein. These forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond our control. When considering those forward-looking statements, the reader should keep in mind the risks, uncertainties and other cautionary statements made in this report. The reader should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement, which speaks only as of the date made. This document also contains information regarding the past performance of our investments and the reader should note that prior or

61


Table of Contents

current performance of investments is not a guarantee or indication of future performance.
          Some factors which may affect the accuracy of the forward-looking statements apply generally to the financial services, real estate, resort development and vacation ownership, and restaurant industries, while other factors apply more specifically to us. Risks and uncertainties associated with BFC, including its wholly-owned Woodbridge subsidiary, include, but are not limited to:
    BFC has negative cash flow and limited sources of cash which may present risks to its ongoing operations;
 
    risks associated with BFC’s current business strategy, including the risk that BFC will not be in a position to provide strategic support to its affiliated entities or that such support will not achieve the anticipated benefits;
 
    the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting the Company and its subsidiaries, and their operations, markets, products and services;
 
    the risk that creditors of the Company’s subsidiaries or other third parties may seek to recover distributions or dividends made by such subsidiaries or other amounts owed by such subsidiaries from their respective parent companies, including BFC;
 
    BFC’s shareholders’ interests may be diluted if additional shares of BFC’s common stock are issued, and BFC’s public company investments may be diluted if BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen or Benihana issue additional shares of its stock;
 
    adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market and other capital markets and the impact of such conditions on the activities of the Company and its subsidiaries;
 
    the impact of the recent economic downturn on the Company and the price and liquidity of its common stock and on BFC’s ability to obtain additional capital, including the risk that if BFC needs or otherwise believes it is advisable to issue debt or equity securities to fund its operations, it may not be possible to issue any such securities on favorable terms, if at all;
 
    strategic alternatives being evaluated by entities in which the Company has investments may not ultimately be pursued or consummated or, if consummated, result in the benefits expected to be achieved;
 
    the performance of entities in which the Company has made investments may not be profitable or their results as anticipated;
 
    BFC is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries to fund its operations; BankAtlantic Bancorp is currently prohibited from paying dividends and may not be in a position to pay dividends in the future, whether as a result of such restrictions continuing in the future or otherwise; Bluegreen has historically not paid dividends on its common stock and its ability to pay dividends may be limited by the terms of certain of its indebtedness;
 
    Future dividends from Benihana with repect to its Convertible Preferred Stock will be less than historical amounts due to our recent conversion of 300,000 shares of the 800,000 shares of such stock that we owned and may be distributed directly to holders of our preferred stock if we do not pay the required qualifying dividends of such stock, the payment of which currently requires the prior written non-objection of the Federal Reserve Board;
 
    the uncertainty regarding the amount of cash that will be required to be paid to Woodbridge shareholders who exercised appraisal rights in connection with Woodbridge’s merger with BFC;
 
    the risk that final releases relating to the resolution of certain Woodbridge indebtedness may not be obtained;
 
    risks associated with the securities we hold directly or indirectly, including the risk that we may be required to record impairment charges with respect to such securities;
 
    the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP involves making estimates, judgments and assumptions, and any changes in estimates, judgments and assumptions used could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and operating results;
 
    the risk that the amount of any tax refund that we may receive in the future may be less than expected, or received later than expected;
 
    uncertainties regarding legislation relating to the regulation of companies within the financial services industry, including bank holding companies, and the impact of such legislation on our operations and the operations of BankAtlantic Bancorp, as well as the risk that BFC will be required by the Federal Reserve Board to enter into a Cease and Desist Order with respect to its ownership and oversight of BankAtlantic Bancorp;
 
    the risks related to litigation and other legal proceedings against BFC and its subsidiaries, including the legal and other professional fees and other costs and expenses of such proceedings, as well as the impact of any finding of liability or damages on our financial condition and operating results; and
 
    the Company’s success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

62


Table of Contents

          With respect to BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic, the risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
    the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting BankAtlantic Bancorp and its operations, markets, products and services, including the impact of the recent downgrade of the credit rating of obligations of the United States of America, the changing regulatory environment, a continued or deepening recession, continued decreases in real estate values, and increased unemployment or sustained high unemployment rates on its business generally, BankAtlantic’s regulatory capital ratios, the ability of its borrowers to service their obligations and its customers to maintain account balances and the value of collateral securing its loans;
 
    credit risks and loan losses, and the related sufficiency of the allowance for loan losses, including the impact on the credit quality of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s loans (including those held in the asset workout subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp) of the economy;
 
    the risks that loan losses have not peaked and risks of additional charge-offs, impairments and required increases in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s allowance for loan losses associated with the economy;
 
    the impact of regulatory proceedings and litigation including but not limited to proceedings and litigation relating to overdraft fees and tax certificates;
 
    the risks associated with maintaining compliance with the Cease and Desist Orders entered into by BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic, including risks that BankAtlantic will not maintain required capital levels, that compliance will adversely impact operations, and that failing to comply with regulatory mandates will result in the imposition of additional regulatory requirements and/or fines;
 
    the risk that changes in interest rates and the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws including their impact on BankAtlantic’s net interest margin;
 
    adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market and other financial and credit markets and the impact of such conditions on BankAtlantic Bancorp’s activities and ability to raise capital;
 
    BankAtlantic Bancorp may seek to raise additional capital and such capital may be highly dilutive to BankAtlantic Bancorp’s shareholders, including BFC, or may not be available;
 
    the risks associated with the impact of periodic valuation testing of goodwill, deferred tax assets and other assets; and
 
    BankAtlantic Bancorp’s success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.
 
      With respect to Bluegreen, the risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
 
    the overall state of the economy, interest rates and the availability of financing may affect Bluegreen’s ability to market vacation ownership interests (“VOIs”) and residential homesites;
 
    Bluegreen would incur substantial losses and its liquidity position could be adversely impacted if the customers it finances default on their obligations;
 
    while Bluegreen has attempted to restructure its business to reduce its need for and reliance on financing for liquidity in the short term, there is no assurance that such restructuring will be successful or that its business and profitability will not otherwise continue to depend on its ability to obtain financing, which may not be available on favorable terms, or at all;
 
    Bluegreen’s future success depends on its ability to market its products successfully and efficiently;
 
    Bluegreen is subject to the risks of the real estate market and the risks associated with real estate development, including the continued decline in real estate values and the deterioration of real estate sales;
 
    Bluegreen may not be successful in increasing or expanding its fee-based services relationships and its fee-based service activities may not be profitable, which may have an adverse impact on its results of operations and financial condition;
 
    Bluegreen’s results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely impacted if Bluegreen Resorts does not continue to participate in exchange networks or its customers are not satisfied with the networks in which it participates;
 
    Bluegreen’s decision to sell its Bluegreen Communities involves a number of risks, including that it may divert management’s attention from its business activities, result in additional impairment charges and not ultimately lead to Bluegreen consummating a transaction or otherwise realizing improvements in its operating results and financial condition;
 
    claims for development-related defects could adversely affect Bluegreen’s financial condition and operating results;
 
    the resale market for VOIs could adversely affect Bluegreen’s business;

63


Table of Contents

    Bluegreen may be adversely affected by federal, state and local laws and regulations and changes in applicable laws and regulations, including the imposition of additional taxes on operations. In addition, results of audits of Bluegreen’s tax returns or those of its subsidiaries may have a material and adverse impact on its financial condition;
 
    environmental liabilities, including claims with respect to mold or hazardous or toxic substances, could have a material adverse impact on Bluegreen’s business;
 
    the ratings of third-party rating agencies could adversely impact Bluegreen’s ability to obtain, renew, or extend credit facilities, debt, or otherwise raise capital;
 
    Bluegreen is subject to risks related to the litigation and other legal proceedings against Bluegreen and its subsidiaries, including that a finding of liability or damages, as well as the legal and other professional fees and other costs and expenses of such proceedings, may have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and operating results;
 
    there are inherent uncertainties involved in estimates, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Any changes in estimates, judgments and assumptions used could have a material adverse impact on Bluegreen operating results and financial condition; and
 
    the loss of the services of Bluegreen’s key management and personnel could adversely affect its business.
          In addition to the risks and factors identified above, reference is also made to other risks and factors detailed in reports filed by the Company, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen with the SEC, including those disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of such reports. The Company cautions that the foregoing factors are not exclusive.

64


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies
          Management views critical accounting policies as accounting policies that are important to the understanding of our financial statements and also involve estimates and judgments about inherently uncertain matters. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated statements of financial condition and assumptions that affect the recognition of income and expenses on the consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes in subsequent periods relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of real estate and its impairment reserves, evaluation of goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment, the valuation of securities, as well as the determination of other-than-temporary declines in value, the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, revenue and cost recognition on percent complete projects, estimated costs to complete construction, the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities in the application of the acquisition method of accounting, the amount of deferred tax asset valuation allowance, accounting for uncertain tax positions, accounting for contingencies, and assumptions used in the valuation of stock based compensation. The accounting policies that we have identified as critical accounting policies are: (i) allowance for loan losses and notes receivable; (ii) the valuation of retained interests in notes receivable sold and the related gains on sales of notes receivable; (iii) the valuation of Bluegreen’s notes receivable which for accounting purposes are treated as having been acquired by BFC; (iv) impairment of long-lived assets including real estate owned and goodwill; (v) the valuation of securities as well as the determination of other-than-temporary declines in value; (vi) accounting for business combinations; (vii) the valuation of real estate; (viii) revenue and cost recognition on percentage-of- completion projects; (ix) estimated cost to complete construction; (x) accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowance; and (xi) accounting for contingencies. For a more detailed discussion of these critical accounting policies see “Critical Accounting Policies” appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
New Accounting Pronouncements
          See Note 20 of the “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” included under Item 1 of this report for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries.
Summary of Consolidated Results of Operations
The table below sets forth the Company’s summarized results of operations (in thousands):
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
            (As Revised)             (As Revised)  
Real Estate and Other
  $ 6,642       11,488       17,631       2,500  
Financial Services
    23,401       (51,250 )     514       (71,771 )
 
                       
Income (loss) from continuing operations
    30,043       (39,762 )     18,145       (69,271 )
Loss from discontinued operations
    (33,026 )     (1,035 )     (33,454 )     (4,626 )
 
                       
Net loss
    (2,983 )     (40,797 )     (15,309 )     (73,897 )
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
    3,955       (25,219 )     (5,760 )     (38,539 )
 
                       
Net loss attributable to BFC
    (6,938 )     (15,578 )     (9,549 )     (35,358 )
5% Preferred stock dividends
    (187 )     (187 )     (375 )     (375 )
 
                       
Net loss allocable to common stock
  $ (7,125 )     (15,765 )     (9,924 )     (35,733 )
 
                       
          Consolidated net loss attributable to BFC for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $6.9 million and $9.5 million, respectively, compared with a net loss of $15.6 million and $35.4 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2010. The results of discontinued operations related to Bluegreen Communities and, for the 2010 periods, two of Core Communities’ commercial leasing projects. See Note 4 of the “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” for further information regarding discontinued operations.
          The 5% Preferred Stock dividend represents the dividends paid by the Company on its 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock.
          The results of our operating business segments and other information on each segment are discussed below in BFC Activities, Real Estate Operations, Bluegreen Resorts, BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company.

65


Table of Contents

          Revisions to Consolidated Financial Statements — On November 16, 2009, we purchased an additional 7.4 million shares of Bluegreen’s common stock. This share purchase increased our ownership interest in Bluegreen to approximately 16.9 million shares, or approximately 52%, of Bluegreen’s outstanding common stock. Accordingly, we are deemed to have a controlling interest in Bluegreen and, under GAAP, Bluegreen’s results are consolidated in our financial statements. The Company accounted for the acquisition of a controlling interest in Bluegreen in accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations, pursuant to which we were required to evaluate the fair value of Bluegreen’s assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date. As previously disclosed, the allocation of the purchase price was based on preliminary estimates of the fair value of Bluegreen’s inventory and contracts, and was subject to change within the measurement period as valuations were finalized. Additionally, any offset relating to amortization/accretion was also retrospectively adjusted in the appropriate periods. As discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, during the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company finalized its valuations and adjusted the preliminary values assigned to the assets and liabilities of Bluegreen in order to reflect additional information obtained since the November 16, 2009 share acquisition date. These changes resulted in the following adjustments at December 31, 2009: a decrease in real estate inventory of approximately $6.9 million; an increase in other assets of approximately $3.5 million; an increase in other liabilities of approximately $4.1 million; and a decrease in deferred income taxes of approximately $7.1 million. Such adjustments resulted in a decrease to the “bargain purchase gain” related to the share acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $183.1 million to $182.8 million. The Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were revised to reflect the impact of the amortization/accretion associated with the above adjustments which resulted in a decrease to the net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 of approximately $188,000 and $276,000, respectively, compared to the previously reported amounts.
          Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2010, management identified certain errors in its previously reported financial statements for 2010 and 2009. Because these errors were not material to the Company’s financial statements for 2010 or 2009, individually or in the aggregate, the Company revised its previously reported 2010 first, second and third quarter financial statements and its 2009 annual financial statements. These adjustments related to the following: the recognition of interest income associated with the notes receivable which for accounting purposes are treated as having been acquired by BFC in accordance with the accounting guidance Loans and Debt Securities with Deteriorated Credit Quality; an adjustment to the provision for loan losses for these notes receivable; interest expense recognition for notes payable of certain defaulted debt at Woodbridge’s subsidiaries, Core Communities, LLC (“Core” or “Core Communities”) and Carolina Oak Homes, LLC (“Carolina Oak”), at the defaulted interest rate, where the stated interest rate was previously used; the recognition of income tax benefits associated with unrealized gains in accumulated other comprehensive income; and an adjustment to deferred taxes related to an impairment to real estate inventory which was reflected after November 16, 2009 and accounted for as a temporary difference, which should have been included in the determination of deferred taxes at the acquisition date, as part of the Bluegreen purchase price allocation.
          The Company’s financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 contained herein reflect the adjustments and revisions described above. The Company will present the impact of these adjustments and revisions for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2011, in which they will be disclosed as comparable periods. The quarterly period adjustments and revisions were previously disclosed in Note 40 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and, with respect to the adjustments for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relating to such quarter.

66


Table of Contents

Consolidated Financial Condition
Consolidated Assets and Liabilities
          Total assets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $5.0 billion and $5.8 billion, respectively. The significant asset reduction resulted primarily from the sale of BankAtlantic’s Tampa branches and the related assumption of deposits by the purchaser and from the repayment of wholesale borrowings at BankAtlantic. Total assets were also reduced at BankAtlantic Bancorp as part of efforts to achieve higher capital requirements required by the Bank Order by June 30, 2011. The primary changes in components of total assets are summarized below:
    an increase in cash and cash equivalents primarily due to BankAtlantic Bancorp’s higher non-interest cash balances at the FHLB;
 
    a decrease in interest-bearing deposits in other banks primarily reflecting cash outflows as part of the sale of BankAtlantic’s Tampa branches;
 
    a decrease in securities available for sale reflecting BankAtlantic Bancorp’s receipts of repayments of short-term agency and municipal securities as well as mortgage-backed securities repayments;
 
    a decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s tax certificate balances primarily relating to redemptions, partially offset by $11.0 million of Florida tax certificate purchases;
 
    a decline in FHLB stock balances resulting from redemptions relating to the repayment of FHLB advances;
 
    an increase in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s loans held for sale primarily associated with the transfer of non-performing residential loans to held for sale;
 
    a decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s loans receivable balances associated with $54.4 million of net-charge-offs, $25.0 million of loans transferred to real estate owned, $27.8 million of loan sales, and repayments of loans in the ordinary course of business;
 
    a decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s accrued interest receivables resulting primarily from lower loan and tax certificate balances; and
 
    a reduction in assets held for sale resulted from the sale of BankAtlantic’s Tampa branches to PNC. The decrease in total assets also includes a $52.7 million decrease in the carrying value of the assets related to Bluegreen Communities to write down the assets to their estimated fair value less cost to sell. As discussed elsewhere in this report, Bluegreen Communities met the criteria for classification as discontinued operations. Accordingly, the operating results of Bluegreen Communities are included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations, and the majority of the assets related to Bluegreen Communities are presented separately on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as “assets held for sale from discontinued operations”
          Total liabilities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $4.8 billion and $5.6 billion, respectively. The primary changes in components of total liabilities are summarized below:
    a decrease in BankAtlantic’s interest bearing deposit account balances associated with the prepayment of $110 million of institutional and public fund time deposits;
 
    an increase in BankAtlantic’s non-interest bearing deposits due primarily to higher average balances per customer account and the transfer of $12.2 million of customer reverse repurchase agreements to non-interest bearing deposits;
 
    a decrease in deposits held for sale associated with the sale of BankAtlantic’s Tampa branches;
 
    lower FHLB advances and short term borrowings at BankAtlantic due to repayments;
 
    a decrease of $11.3 million in the deferred gain on debt settlement which was recognized into income upon Core receiving a general release of liability during the three months ended March 31, 2011;
 
    an increase in the deferred gain on debt settlement of $29.9 million at June 30, 2011 related to the debt settlement of Carolina Oak, which will be recognized into income at the earlier of the conclusion of the related foreclosure proceeding or April 24, 2012; and
 
    an increase in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s junior subordinated debentures liability due to interest deferrals.

67


Table of Contents

BFC Activities
BFC Activities
          The BFC Activities segment consists of BFC operations, dividends from our investment in Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock, and other operations of Woodbridge. BFC operations primarily consist of our corporate overhead and general and administrative expenses, including the expenses of Woodbridge, the financial results of a venture partnership that BFC controls and other equity investments, as well as income and expenses associated with BFC’s shared service operations which provides human resources, risk management, investor relations and executive office administration services to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen. This segment also includes investments made by our wholly owned subsidiary, BFC/CCC, Inc (“BFC/CCC”). Woodbridge’s other operations include the activities of Pizza Fusion Holdings, Inc. (“Pizza Fusion”) and Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC, as well as certain other investments.
          The discussion that follows reflects the operations and related matters of BFC Activities (in thousands).
                                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     Change     For the Six Months Ended     Change  
    June 30,     2011 vs.     June 30,     2011 vs.  
    2011     2010     2010     2011     2010     2010  
Revenues
                                               
Other revenues
  $ 299       482       (183 )     570       869       (299 )
 
                                   
 
    299       482       (183 )     570       869       (299 )
 
                                   
Cost and Expenses
                                               
Interest expense
    1,511       1,643       (132 )     2,872       3,481       (609 )
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    5,212       7,141       (1,929 )     10,588       13,628       (3,040 )
 
                                   
 
    6,723       8,784       (2,061 )     13,460       17,109       (3,649 )
Loss on settlement of investment in subsidiary
          (1,135 )     1,135             (1,135 )     1,135  
Equity in earnings (loss) from unconsolidated affiliates
    8       4       4       1,369       (27 )     1,396  
Other income
    1,481       1,772       (291 )     2,799       3,166       (367 )
 
                                   
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
    (4,935 )     (7,661 )     2,726       (8,722 )     (14,236 )     5,514  
Less: Benefit for income taxes
    (52 )     (5,379 )     5,327       (196 )     (6,546 )     6,350  
 
                                   
Net loss
  $ (4,883 )     (2,282 )     (2,601 )     (8,526 )     (7,690 )     (836 )
 
                                   
          Other revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are related to franchise revenues generated by Pizza Fusion.
          The decrease in interest expense primarily resulted from lower interest rates. No interest was capitalized during the three or six months ended June 30, 2011 or 2010.
          The decrease in general and administrative expenses of approximately $1.9 million and $3.0 million during the three and six months ended June 30 2011, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2010 was primarily due to a decline in employee compensation and benefits, which primarily resulted from workforce reductions and lower bonuses. Additional declines in general and administrative expenses were due to lower franchise and contract fees due to Pizza Fusion store closures. This was offset in part by higher legal fees and professional fees incurred in 2011.
          The increase in equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates of approximately $1.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 was primarily due to the recognition of the negative basis of an investment in BFC/CCC’s wholly-owned subsidiary of approximately $1.3 million. BFC/CCC’s wholly-owned subsidiary had a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owned two commercial properties in Hillsborough County, Florida which served as collateral for an approximately $26.0 million loan to the limited liability company. In connection with the purchase of the commercial properties in November 2006, BFC and the unaffiliated member of the limited liability company each guaranteed the payment of up to a maximum of $5.0 million for certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that were not related to the financial performance of the properties. BFC and the unaffiliated member also entered into a cross indemnification agreement which limited BFC’s obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates. On March 25, 2011, the limited liability company reached a settlement with its lender, pursuant to which it has conveyed the commercial properties securing the loan via a deed in lieu of foreclosure. BFC and BFC/CCC’s wholly-owned subsidiary were released from all obligations and guarantees related to the two commercial properties. During the first quarter of 2011, BFC recognized the negative basis of its investment of approximately $1.3 million.

68


Table of Contents

BFC Activities
          The increase in income tax benefit during the second quarter of 2010 was due to the recognition of a tax benefit of approximately $5.4 million resulting from an expected additional tax refund due to a change in IRS guidance, of which approximately $1.1 million may be payable to the Levitt and Sons’ estate. The $1.1 million was recorded in the (loss) gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary and is subject to change pending a final review of the $5.4 million expected tax refund by the IRS.
2008 Step acquisitions — Purchase Accounting
          During 2008, BFC purchased an aggregate of 723,848 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock on the open market. The shares purchased were accounted for as step acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting then in effect. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities acquired were revalued to reflect market values at the date of acquisition. The discounts and premiums arising as a result of such revaluation are generally being accreted or amortized, net of tax, over the remaining life of the assets and liabilities. The net impact of such accretion, amortization and other effects of purchase accounting decreased our consolidated net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 by approximately $356,000 and $516,000, respectively. The net impact also decreased our consolidated net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2010 by approximately $23,000 and increased our consolidated net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2010 by approximately $62,000.
BFC Activities- Liquidity and Capital Resources
          As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling approximately $7 million and $29 million, respectively. The decrease in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments was due to the purchase of 13.3 million shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s 2011 rights offering for approximately $10 million, as described below, BFC’s operating and general and administrative expenses of approximately $6.4 million, junior subordinated debentures interest payments of approximately $2.6 million and $2.5 million payment to the note holder in connection with a settlement agreement, as discussed below.
          Except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen and Woodbridge are not direct obligations of BFC and generally are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC, absent a dividend or distribution from those entities. BFC’s principal sources of liquidity are its available cash, including tax refunds received as a result of tax law changes, short-term investments, and dividends from Benihana on our holdings of its convertible preferred stock. In addition, dividends we receive from Benihana in the future will be less than historical amounts due to our conversion of an aggregate of 300,000 shares out of a total of 800,000 shares of Benihana’s convertible preferred stock during May and July 2011. However, the holders of our preferred stock may have the right to receive such dividends from Benihana in our place if the Federal Reserve Board does not consent to our payment of dividends on our preferred stock or we otherwise fail to satisfy such obligation. W also expect to receive an additional $7.5 million tax refund, net of amounts payable under the settlement agreement related to the bankruptcy filing of Levitt and Sons LLC and substantially all of its subsidiaries, as discussed in Note 15 of the “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.”
          We expect to use our available funds to fund operations and meet our obligations. We may also use available funds to make additional investments in the companies within our consolidated group, invest in equity securities and other investments, or repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program. On September 21, 2009, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program which authorizes the repurchase of up to 20,000,000 shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock at an aggregate cost of no more than $10 million. The share repurchase program replaced our $10 million repurchase program that our Board of Directors approved in October 2006 which placed a limitation on the number of shares which could be repurchased under the program at 1,750,000 shares of Class A Common Stock. The current program, like the prior program, authorizes management, at its discretion, to repurchase shares from time to time subject to market conditions and other factors. No shares were repurchased during the years ended December 31, 2010 or 2009, or during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
          During June 2011, BFC acquired an aggregate of 13.3 million shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock in connection with the exercise of subscriptions rights granted to it in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s rights offering (the “2011 Rights Offering”). The aggregate purchase price for the 13.3 million shares purchased was $10.0 million. The shares acquired in the 2011 Rights Offering increased BFC’s ownership interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 8% to 53% and BFC’s voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 5% to 75%.

69


Table of Contents

BFC Activities
          Since March 2009, BFC has not received cash dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic Bancorp is currently prohibited from paying dividends on its common stock without first receiving the written non-objection of the OTS. In addition, during February 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp elected to exercise its right to defer payments of interest on its trust preferred junior subordinated debt. BankAtlantic Bancorp is permitted to defer quarterly interest payments for up to 20 consecutive quarters. During the deferral period, BankAtlantic Bancorp is prohibited from paying dividends to its shareholders, including BFC. While BankAtlantic Bancorp can end the deferral period at any time, BankAtlantic Bancorp has indicated that it anticipates that it may continue to defer such interest payments for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, BFC has not received cash dividends from Bluegreen and does not expect to receive cash dividends from Bluegreen in the foreseeable future. Certain of Bluegreen’s credit facilities contain terms which may limit the payment of cash dividends, and Bluegreen may only pay dividends as declared by its Board of Directors, a majority of whom are independent directors under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.
          We believe that our current financial condition and credit relationships, together with anticipated cash flows from other sources of funds, including tax refunds and, to the extent determined to be advisable, proceeds from the disposition of properties or investments, will allow us to meet our anticipated near-term liquidity needs. With respect to long-term liquidity requirements, in addition to the foregoing, we may also, subject to the receipt of any regulatory approval or non-objection, seek to raise funds through the incurrence of long-term secured or unsecured indebtedness, the issuance of equity and/or debt securities or through the sale of assets. However, these alternatives may not be available to us on attractive terms, or at all.
          BFC, on a parent company only basis, had previously committed that it would not, without the prior written non-objection of the OTS, (i) incur, issue, renew or roll over any current lines of credit, guarantee the debt of any other entity or otherwise incur any additional debt, except as contemplated by BFC’s business plan or in connection with BankAtlantic’s compliance requirements applicable to it; (ii) declare or make any dividends or other capital distributions other than dividends payable on BFC’s currently outstanding preferred stock of approximately $187,500 a quarter or (iii) enter into any new agreements, contracts or arrangements or materially modify any existing agreements, contracts or arrangements with BankAtlantic not consistent with past practices. On June 30, 2011, the OTS advised BFC that it was not permitted to (i) incur or issue any additional debt or debt securities, increase lines of credit or guarantee the debt of any other entity, or (ii) make dividend payments on its preferred stock, in each case without the prior written non-objection of the OTS. On July 21, 2011, BFC made a formal request to the Federal Reserve Board, which now has the supervisory authority previously held by the OTS, for non-objection to the payment of the dividend on its outstanding preferred stock.
          On September 21, 2009, BFC and Woodbridge consummated their merger pursuant to which Woodbridge merged with BFC. In connection with the merger, Dissenting Holders who collectively held approximately 4.2 million shares of Woodbridge’s Class A Common Stock have exercised their appraisal rights and are entitled to receive an amount equal to the fair value of their shares calculated in accordance with Florida law. The Dissenting Holders have rejected Woodbridge’s offer of $1.10 per share and requested payment for their shares based on their respective fair value estimates of Woodbridge’s Class A Common Stock. In December 2009, the Company recorded a $4.6 million liability with a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in capital representing, in the aggregate, Woodbridge’s offer to the Dissenting Holders. However, the appraisal rights litigation is currently ongoing and its outcome is uncertain. There is no assurance as to the amount of cash that will be required to be paid to the Dissenting Holders, which amount may be greater than the $4.6 million that we have accrued.
          During 2004, the Company purchased 800,000 shares of Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock (“Convertible Preferred Stock”) for $25.00 per share. The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into Benihana’s Common Stock at a conversion price of $12.67 per share of Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to adjustment from time to time upon the occurrence of certain defined events. During May 2011 and July 2011, we converted an aggregate of 300,000 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock into 595,049 shares of Benihana’s Common Stock. These conversions were effected to facilitate shareholder approval of Benihana’s current proposal to reclassify each share of its Class A Common Stock into one share of its Common Stock. BFC strongly supports Benihana’s reclassification proposal and BFC intends to vote all shares of Benihana’s stock owned or controlled by it in favor of the reclassification. The Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory redemption at the original issue price of $25 per share ($12.5 million for the remaining 500,000 shares) plus accumulated dividends on July 2, 2014 unless the Company elects to extend the mandatory redemption date to a later date not to extend beyond July 2, 2024. The Company receives cumulative quarterly dividends on its shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock at an annual rate equal to 5% or $1.25 per share, payable on the last day of each calendar quarter. As a result

70


Table of Contents

BFC Activities
of the conversions, the dividend payments we receive from Benihana on the Convertible Preferred Stock will be less than the amounts we have historically received. Based on the number of currently outstanding shares of Benihana’s capital stock, the 500,000 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock currently held by us, if converted, together with the 595,049 shares of Benihana’s Common Stock currently held by us would represent in the aggregate an approximately 19% voting interest and an approximately 9% economic interest in Benihana.
          On June 21, 2004, the Company sold 15,000 shares of its 5% Preferred Stock to an investor group in a private offering. The Company’s 5% Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 per share. The shares of 5% Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option of the Company, from time to time, at redemption prices ranging from $1,025 per share for the year 2011 to $1,000 per share for the year 2015 and thereafter. The 5% Preferred Stock liquidation preference is equal to its stated value of $1,000 per share plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends or an amount equal to the applicable redemption price in a voluntary liquidation or winding up of the Company. Holders of the 5% Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except as provided by Florida law, and are entitled to receive, when and as declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, cumulative quarterly cash dividends on each such share at a rate per annum of 5% of the stated value from the date of issuance. Since June 2004, the Company has paid quarterly dividends on the 5% Preferred Stock of $187,500. On December 17, 2008, the Company amended certain of the previously designated relative rights, preferences and limitations of the Company’s 5% Preferred Stock. The amendment eliminated the right of the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock to convert their shares of Preferred Stock into shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. The amendment also requires the Company to redeem shares of the 5% Preferred Stock with the net proceeds it receives in the event (i) the Company sells any of its shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock, (ii) the Company sells any shares of Benihana’s Common Stock received upon conversion of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock or (iii) Benihana redeems any shares of its Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Company. Additionally, in the event the Company defaults on its obligation to make dividend payments on its 5% Preferred Stock, the amendment entitles the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock, in place of the Company, to receive directly from Benihana certain payments on the shares of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Company or on the shares of Benihana’s Common Stock received by the Company upon conversion of Benihana’s Convertible Preferred Stock. On July 21, 2011, BFC made a formal request to the Federal Reserve Board, which now has the supervisory authority previously held by the OTS, for non-objection to the payment of the dividend on its outstanding preferred stock.
          The development activities at Carolina Oak, which is within Tradition Hilton Head, were suspended in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of, among other things, an overall softening of demand for new homes and a decline in the overall economy. In 2009, the housing industry continued to face significant challenges and Woodbridge made the decision to cease all activities at Carolina Oak. Woodbridge was the obligor under a $37.2 million loan that was collateralized by the Carolina Oak property. During November 2009, the lender filed an action against Woodbridge and Carolina Oak alleging default under a promissory note and breach of a guaranty related to the loan. During December 2009, the OTS closed the lender and appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) as receiver. The FDIC subsequently sold the loan to an investor group (sometimes referred to herein as the “note holder”). Effective April 26, 2011, Woodbridge and Carolina Oak entered into a settlement agreement with the note holder to resolve the disputes and litigation between them. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, (i) Woodbridge paid $2.5 million to the note holder, (ii) Carolina Oak conveyed to the note holder the real property securing the loan and (iii) the note holder agreed not to pursue certain remedies, including a deficiency judgment, and after the expiration of an agreed-upon time, agreed to fully release Woodbridge and Carolina Oak, in each case subject to certain conditions. At April 26, 2011, the carrying amount of Carolina Oak’s inventory was approximately $10.8 million. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, the Company recorded a deferred gain on debt settlement of $29.9 million in its Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2011. The deferred gain will be recognized into income at the earlier of the conclusion of a foreclosure proceeding or April 25, 2012.
          During June 2008, Woodbridge entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with the Debtors and the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Joint Committee”) appointed in the Chapter 11 Cases relating to the voluntary bankruptcy petitions filed by Levitt and Sons and substantially all of its subsidiaries during November 2007. . Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, as it was subsequently amended, Woodbridge agreed to (i) pay $8 million to the Debtors’ bankruptcy estates (sometimes referred to herein as the “Debtors’ Estate”), (ii) place $4.5 million in a release fund to be disbursed to third party creditors in exchange for a third party release and injunction, (iii) make a $300,000 payment to a deposit holders fund and (iv) share a percentage of any tax refund attributable to periods prior to the bankruptcy with the Debtors’ Estate. In addition, Woodbridge agreed to waive and release substantially all of the claims it had against the Debtors, including administrative expense claims through July 2008, and the Debtors (joined by the Joint Committee) agreed to waive and release any claims they had against

71


Table of Contents

BFC Activities
Woodbridge and its affiliates. On February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Joint Committee. That order also approved the settlement pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, as amended. The Company’s liability related to the Settlement Agreement at each of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately $11.7 million, representing the portion of tax refund that will likely be required to be shared with the Debtors’ Estate pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $8.4 million of such $11.7 million portion of the tax refund to be paid to the Debtors’ Estate was received and placed in an escrow account. The $8.4 million amount is included as restricted cash in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
          At June 30, 2009, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC had a 10% interest in a limited partnership as a non-managing general partner. The partnership owns an office building located in Boca Raton, Florida. In connection with the purchase of the office building in March 2006, BFC/CCC guaranteed repayment of a portion of the non-recourse loan on the property on a joint and several basis with the managing general partner. BFC/CCC’s maximum exposure under this guarantee agreement was $2.0 million (which was shared on a joint and several basis with the managing general partner). In July 2009, BFC/CCC’s wholly-owned subsidiary withdrew as a partner of the limited partnership and transferred its 10% interest to an unaffiliated partner. In return, the partner to whom this interest was assigned agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the release of BFC/CCC from the guarantee. The partner was unable to secure such a release and that partner has agreed to indemnify BFC/CCC’s wholly-owned subsidiary for any losses that may arise under the guarantee after the date of the assignment. No amounts are recorded in our financial statements at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010 for this joint venture.
          As described above, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC had a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owned two commercial properties in Hillsborough County, Florida. On March 25, 2011, the limited liability company reached a settlement with its lender and conveyed the commercial properties securing the loan via a deed in lieu of foreclosure. BFC and BFC/CCC’s wholly-owned subsidiary were released from all obligations and guarantees related to the two commercial properties. As described above, during the first quarter of 2011, BFC recognized the negative basis of its investment of approximately $1.3 million which is included in equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates.
          A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 50% limited partner interest in a limited partnership that has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owns an office building in Tampa, Florida. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying amount of this investment was approximately $286,000 and $282,000, respectively, which is included in investments in unconsolidated affiliates in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. In connection with the purchase of the office building by the limited liability company in June 2007, BFC guaranteed the payment of certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are not related to the financial performance of the asset up to a maximum of $15.0 million, or $25.0 million in the event of any petition or involuntary proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or similar state insolvency laws or in the event of any transfer of interests not in accordance with the loan documents. BFC and the unaffiliated members also entered into a cross indemnification agreement which limits BFC’s obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates. No amounts are recorded in the Company’s financial statements at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010 for the obligations associated with this guarantee based on the potential indemnification by unaffiliated members and the limit of the specific obligations to non-financial matters.

72


Table of Contents

Real Estate
Real Estate Operations Segment
          The Real Estate Operations segment includes the subsidiaries through which Woodbridge historically conducted its real estate business activities. These activities were concentrated in Florida and South Carolina and included the development and sale of land, the construction and sale of single family homes and townhomes and the leasing of commercial properties through Core prior to its liquidation in 2010 and Carolina Oak, which was engaged in homebuilding activities in South Carolina prior to the suspension of those activities in the fourth quarter of 2008. The Real Estate Operations segment also includes the operations of Cypress Creek Holdings, which engages in leasing activities. Cypress Creek Holdings did not have any lease contracts in effect during the three or six months ended June 30, 2011.
Real Estate Operations
                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended    
    June 30,     June 30,    
    2011     2010     Change     2011     2010     Change  
(In thousands)           (Revised)                     (Revised)          
Revenues:
                                               
Sales of real estate
  $       2,455       (2,455 )           2,455       (2,455 )
Other revenues
    (34 )     297       (331 )     (17 )     934       (951 )
 
                                   
Total revenues
    (34 )     2,752       (2,786 )     (17 )     4,432       (3,406 )
 
                                   
 
                                               
Costs and expenses:
                                               
Cost of sales of real estate
          2,175       (2,175 )           2,175       (2,175 )
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    363       1,802       (1,439 )     852       4,461       (3,609 )
Interest expense
    835       3,150       (2,315 )     2,237       6,460       (4,223 )
 
                                   
Total costs and expenses
    1,198       7,127       (5,929 )     3,089       13,096       (10,007 )
 
                                   
 
                                               
Gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary
                      11,305             11,305  
Interest and other income
    4       708       (704 )     4       761       (757 )
 
                                   
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
    (1,228 )     (3,667 )     2,439       8,203       (8,946 )     17,149  
Benefit for income taxes
                                   
 
                                   
(Loss) income from continuing operations
    (1,228 )     (3,667 )     2,439       8,203       (8,946 )     17,149  
Discontinued operations:
                                               
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
          2,714       (2,714 )           2,465       (2,465 )
 
                                   
Net (loss) income
  $ (1,228 )     (953 )     (275 )     8,203       (6,481 )     14,684  
 
                                   
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to the Same 2010 Period
          During the three months ended June 30, 2010, Core sold approximately 8 acres, which generated revenues of approximately $2.5 million. No sales were effected during the three months ended June 30, 2011. Other revenues recognized for the three months ended June 30, 2010 is comprised of irrigation revenue earned at one of Core’s five subsidiaries whose membership interests were pledged as additional collateral in the debt settlement agreement with one of Core’s lenders.
          Cost of sales of real estate during the three months ended June 30, 2010 was primarily related to the sales of real estate at Core.
          Interest expense decreased to $835,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $3.2 million for the same period in 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the release of approximately $149.5 million of debt as part of Carolina Oak and Core’s settlement agreements with their lenders.
          Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $363,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $1.8 million for the same period in 2010. The decrease was primarily a result of the cessation of operations at Core.

73


Table of Contents

Real Estate
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to the Same 2010 Period
          During the six months ended June 30, 2010, Core sold approximately 8 acres, which generated revenues of approximately $2.5 million, and cost of sales related to the sale amounted to $2.2 million. No sales were effected during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
          Other revenues recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2010 primarily consisted of rental income from a tenant whose lease agreement expired in March 2010 and irrigation revenue earned at one of Core’s five subsidiaries whose membership interests were pledged as additional collateral in the debt settlement agreement with one of Core’s lenders.
          Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $852,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $4.5 million for the same 2010 period. The decrease was primarily a result of the cessation of operations at Core.
          Interest incurred totaled $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $6.5 million for the same 2010 period. The decrease was primarily due to the release of approximately $149.5 million of debt as part of Carolina Oak and Core’s settlement agreements with their lenders. No interest was capitalized during the six months ended June 30, 2011 or 2010.
          Income from discontinued operations related to two of Core’s commercial leasing projects, of which $2.6 million related to the gain in connection with the sale of the projects in June 2010. See Note 4 of the “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” for further information.
          Gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary of $11.3 million is attributable to the deconsolidation of five of Core’s subsidiaries, the membership interests in which were transferred to one of Core’s lenders upon settlement of $86.7 million in debt.
Real Estate Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources
          At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Core had cash and cash equivalents of $138,000 and $1.0 million, respectively.
          During 2010, demand for residential and commercial inventory showed no signs of recovery, particularly in the geographic regions where Core’s properties were located. In early 2010, Woodbridge made the decision to pursue an orderly liquidation of Core and worked cooperatively with its various lenders to achieve that objective. During November 2010, Core entered into a settlement agreement with one of its lenders, which had previously commenced actions seeking foreclosure of mortgage loans totaling approximately $113.9 million collateralized by property in Florida and South Carolina. Under the terms of the agreement, Core pledged additional collateral to the lender consisting of membership interests in five of Core’s subsidiaries and granted security interests in the acreage owned by such subsidiaries in Port St. Lucie, Florida, substantially all of which was undeveloped raw land. Core also agreed to an amendment of the complaint related to the Florida foreclosure action to include this additional collateral and entered into consensual judgments of foreclosure in both the Florida and South Carolina foreclosure actions. In consideration therefor, the lender agreed not to enforce a deficiency judgment against Core and, in February 2011, released Core from any other claims arising from or relating to the loans. As of November 30, 2010, Core deconsolidated the five subsidiaries, the membership interests in which were transferred to the lender upon entry of the consensual judgments of foreclosure. In accordance with the accounting guidance for consolidation, the Company recorded a guarantee obligation “deferred gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary” of $11.3 million in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2010. Core received its general release of liability, and accordingly the deferred gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary was recognized into income during the first quarter of 2011. Approximately $27.2 million of the $113.9 million of mortgage loans described above is collateralized by property in South Carolina which had an estimated carrying value of approximately $19.4 million at June 30, 2011. This property is subject to separate foreclosure proceedings which are expected to occur during the fourth quarter of 2011. While Core was released by the lender from any other claims relating to the loans, the applicable accounting guidance requires that the $27.2 million of debt and associated $19.4 million of collateral remain in Core’s financial statements until the foreclosure proceedings have been completed.

74


Table of Contents

Real Estate
          In December 2010, Core and one of its subsidiaries entered into agreements, including a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreement, with one of their lenders which resolved the foreclosure proceedings relating to property at Tradition Hilton Head which served as collateral for a $25 million loan. Pursuant to the agreements, Core’s subsidiary transferred to the lender all of its rights to the property which served as collateral for the loan as well as certain additional real and personal property. The lender, in turn, released Core and its subsidiary from any claims arising from or relating to the loan. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, this transaction was accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring and, accordingly, a $13.0 million gain on debt extinguishment was recognized in December 2010.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
          The following table summarizes our Real Estate and Other contractual obligations (excluding Bluegreen) as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
                                         

Category (1)
 
Total
    Less than 12
months
    13-36
Months
    37-60 Months     More than
60 Months
 
Long Term Debt Obligations(2)
  $ 123,573       27,486       517       10,518       85,052  
Operating Lease Obligations
    135       45       71       19        
     
Total Obligations
  $ 123,708       27,531       588       10,537       85,052  
     
 
(1)   Long-term debt obligations consist of notes, mortgage notes and bonds payable and junior subordinated debentures. Operating lease obligations consist of lease commitments. The timing of contractual payments for debt obligations assumes the exercise of all extensions available at our sole discretion. Long-term debt obligations and long-term debt obligations include defaulted loans totaling approximately $27.2 million as of June 30, 2011 of which repayment of the outstanding debt was accelerated by the lender and is currently being shown as immediately due and payable in less than 12 months.
 
(2)   These amounts include scheduled principal payments.
          In addition to the above contractual obligations, we have $2.4 million in unrecognized tax benefits in accordance with accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes, which provides guidance for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take on a tax return.
          Levitt and Sons, Woodbridge’s former wholly-owned homebuilding subsidiary, had approximately $33.3 million of surety bonds related to its ongoing projects at November 9, 2007, the date on which Levitt and Sons and substantially all of its subsidiaries filed the Chapter 11 Cases. In the event that these obligations are drawn and paid by the surety, Woodbridge could be responsible for up to $7.6 million plus costs and expenses in accordance with the surety indemnity agreements executed by Woodbridge. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Woodbridge had $490,000 in surety bond accruals related to certain bonds where management believes it to be probable that Woodbridge will be required to reimburse the surety under applicable indemnity agreements. It is unclear whether and to what extent the remaining outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be responsible for additional amounts beyond the previous accrued amount. Woodbridge will not receive any repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery of any amounts it may be required to pay. In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require Woodbridge to post collateral against a portion of surety bond exposure in connection with demands made by a municipality. Based on claims by the municipality on the bonds, the surety requested that Woodbridge post a $4.0 million escrow deposit while the matter was being litigated with the municipality and while Woodbridge did not believe that the municipality had the right to demand payment under the bonds, Woodbridge complied with that request. In August 2010, a motion for summary judgment was entered in Woodbridge’s favor terminating any obligations under the bonds. The municipality has appealed the decision.

75


Table of Contents

Real Estate
Bluegreen
The Company’s consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 include the results of operations of Bluegreen Resorts, the operating segment of Bluegreen engaged in the vacation ownership industry. Due to Bluegreen’s Board of Directors recent determination to pursue the sale of Bluegreen Communities or all or substantially all of its assets, the operating results of Bluegreen Communities are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 4 of the “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” for information regarding the results of discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Bluegreen is a separate public company, and the following discussion is derived from or includes disclosure prepared by Bluegreen’s management and included in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Accordingly, unless noted to the contrary or the context otherwise requires, references to the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” in the following discussion are references to Bluegreen and its subsidiaries, and are not references to BFC.
          Bluegreen’s results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 reflect its continued focus on fee-based service business and its efforts to achieve selling and marketing efficiencies in its Bluegreen Resorts segment.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011
    Bluegreen generated “free cash flow” (cash flow from operating and investing activities) of $41.6 million.
 
    VOI system-wide sales, which include sales of third-party developer inventory, totaled $79.1 million, and remained consistent with the $79.5 million generated during the three months ended June 30, 2010.
 
    Bluegreen’s sales and marketing fee-based service business sold $27.0 million of third-party developer inventory and earned sales and marketing commissions of $18.3 million. Including Bluegreen’s resort management, resort title, construction management and other operations, Bluegreen’s total resort fee-based services revenues were $35.6 million, a 25% increase over the three months ended June 30, 2010.
          Bluegreen believes its fee-based service business enables Bluegreen to leverage its management, sales and marketing, mortgage servicing, title and construction experience to generate recurring revenues from third parties. Bluegreen’s provision of these services requires significantly less capital investment than its traditional vacation ownership business. During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Bluegreen sold $27.0 million and $18.2 million, respectively, of third-party inventory and earned sales and marketing commissions of approximately $18.3 million and $12.1 million, respectively. Based on an allocation of its selling, marketing and segment general and administrative expenses to these sales, Bluegreen believes it generated approximately $4.6 million and $2.4 million pre-tax profits by providing these sales and marketing fee-based services during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Bluegreen sold $43.9 million and $34.0 million, respectively, of third-party inventory and earned sales and marketing commissions of approximately $29.1 million and $22.3 million, respectively. Based on an allocation of our selling, marketing and field general and administrative expenses to these sales, Bluegreen believes it generated approximately $5.8 million and $3.2 million in pre-tax profits by providing these sales and marketing fee-based services during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
          Additionally, consistent with Bluegreen’s initiatives to improve liquidity, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen continued to focus on entering into VOI sales that are paid in cash in full at the time of sale and encouraging larger down payments on financed sales. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, including down payments received on financed sales, 57% of Bluegreen’s VOI sales were paid in cash within approximately 30 days from the contract date. Refer to the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below for additional information.
          Bluegreen has historically experienced and expects to continue to experience seasonal fluctuations in its gross revenues and results of operations. This seasonality may result in fluctuations in Bluegreen quarterly operating results. Although Bluegreen typically sees more potential customers at its sales offices during the quarters ending in June and September, ultimate recognition of the resulting sales during these periods may be delayed due to down payment requirements for recognition of real estate sales under GAAP or due to the timing of development and the requirement that Bluegreen uses the percentage-of-completion method of accounting.

76


Table of Contents

Real Estate
Bluegreen Resorts Financial Results
          The following tables include the financial results of Bluegreen Resorts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
   
Amount
    Percentage of
Sale
   
Amount
    Percentage of
Sale
 
            (dollars in thousands)    
                    (As Revised)          
System-wide sales of VOIs (1)
  $ 79,149               79,485          
Changes in sales deferred under timeshare accounting rules
    (788 )             (4,017 )        
 
                           
System-wide sales of VOIs,net (1)
    78,361       100 %     75,468       100 %
Less: Sales of third-party VOIs
    (26,951 )     -34 %     (18,201 )     -24 %
 
                       
Gross sales of VOIs
    51,410       66 %     57,267       76 %
Estimated uncollectible VOI notes receivable (2)
    (6,066 )     -12 %     2,688       5 %
 
                       
Sales of VOIs
    45,344       58 %     59,955       79 %
Cost of VOIs sold (3)
    6,703       15 %     8,423       14 %
 
                       
Gross profit (3)
    38,641       85 %     51,532       86 %
Fee-based sales commission revenue
    18,308       23 %     12,130       16 %
Other fee-based services revenue
    17,287       22 %     16,423       22 %
Cost of other fee-based services
    9,231       12 %     9,686       13 %
Net carrying cost of VOI inventory
    2,925       4 %     1,766       2 %
Selling and marketing expenses
    35,018       45 %     35,120       47 %
Field general and administrative expenses (4)
    4,610       6 %     4,074       5 %
 
                       
Segment operating profit
  $ 22,452       29 %     29,439       39 %
 
                       
                                 
    For the Six Months Ended June 30,    
    2011     2010  
   
Amount
    Percentage of
Sale
   
Amount
    Percentage of
Sale
 
            (dollars in thousands)          
                    (As Revised)          
System-wide sales of VOIs (1)
  $ 137,623               134,757          
Changes in sales deferred under timeshare accounting rules
    (1,304 )             (14,158 )        
 
                           
System-wide sales of VOIs,net (1)
    136,319       100 %     120,599       100 %
Less: Sales of third-party VOIs
    (43,861 )     -32 %     (33,955 )     -28 %
 
                       
Gross sales of VOIs
    92,458       68 %     86,644       72 %
Estimated uncollectible VOI notes receivable (2)
    (10,780 )     -12 %     (2,083 )     -2 %
 
                       
Sales of VOIs
    81,678       60 %     84,561       70 %
Cost of VOIs sold (3)
    13,927       17 %     11,158       13 %
 
                       
Gross profit (3)
    67,751       83 %     73,403       87 %
Fee-based sales commission revenue
    29,072       21 %     22,310       18 %
Other fee-based services revenue
    34,487       25 %     32,093       27 %
Cost of other fee-based services
    18,170       13 %     18,078       15 %
Net carrying cost of VOI inventory
    7,067       5 %     5,317       4 %
Selling and marketing expenses
    63,547       47 %     62,503       52 %
Field general and administrative expenses (4)
    8,611       6 %     6,025       5 %
 
                       
Segment operating profit
  $ 33,915       25 %     35,883       30 %
 
                       
 
(1)   Includes sales of VOI’s made on behalf of third parties, which are transacted in the same manner as the sale of Bluegreen’s VOI inventory.
 
(2)   Percentages for estimated uncollectible VOI notes receivable are calculated as a percentage of gross sales of VOIs.
 
(3)   Percentages for cost of VOIs sales and the associated gross profit are calculated as a percentage of sales of VOIs.

77


Table of Contents

Real Estate
(4)   General and administrative expenses attributable to corporate overhead have been excluded from the table. Corporate general and administrative expenses totaled $10.3 million and $9.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $20.8 million and $22.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. See Corporate General and Administrative Expenses below for further details.
Bluegreen Resorts
Bluegreen Resorts — Resort Sales and Marketing
          The following table sets forth certain information for sales of both Bluegreen VOIs and VOI sales made on behalf of third-party for a fee for the periods indicated. The information is provided before giving effect to the deferral of Bluegreen VOI sales in accordance with timeshare accounting rules:
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months Ended  
    Ended June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Number of sales offices at period end
    20       21       20       21  
Number of Bluegreen VOI sales transactions
    4,505       5,170       8,027       8,647  
Number of sales made on behalf of third-parties for a fee
    2,054       1,479       3,420       2,796  
Total number of VOI sales transactions
    6,559       6,649       11,447       11,443  
Average sales price per transaction
  $ 12,250     $ 11,990     $ 12,189     $ 11,842  
Number of total prospects tours
    45,348       44,026       77,632       73,579  
Sale-to-tour conversion ratio— total prospects
    14.5 %     15.1 %     14.7 %     15.6 %
Number of new prospects tours
    26,966       26,329       44,766       41,737  
Sale-to-tour conversion ratio— new prospects
    10.2 %     10.5 %     10.7 %     11.1 %
Percentage of sales to owners
    57.2 %     57.0 %     58.1 %     59.0 %
Sales and Marketing
System-wide sales of VOIs. System-wide sales of VOIs include sales of our VOIs as well as sales of VOIs owned by third parties. The sales of third party VOIs are transacted through the same selling and marketing process we use to sell our VOI inventory. We earn commissions on such sales from third parties. System-wide sales of VOIs during the three months ended June 30, 2011 were $79.1 million and $79.5 million for the same period in 2010. System-wide sales of VOIs were $137.6 million and $134.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. System-wide sales increased 2% during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010 due to a higher average sales price per transaction realized during the 2011 period.
Sales of VOIs. Sales of VOIs for Bluegreen Resorts were $45.3 and $60.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Sales of real estate for Bluegreen Resorts were $81.7 million and $84.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Sales of VOIs represents sales of Bluegreen-owned VOI’s, as adjusted by changes in sales deferred under GAAP, the impact of estimated uncollectible VOI notes receivable on new loan originations, and adjustments, if any, to allowance for loan losses of existing VOI loans, as further described below.
VOI revenue is reduced by Bluegreen’s estimate of future uncollectible VOI notes receivable. Estimated losses for uncollectible VOI notes receivable vary with the amount of financed sales during the period and changes in its estimates of future note receivable performance for newly originated loans and the future performance of our existing loan portfolio.
Cost of VOIs Sold. Cost of VOIs sold is the cost of Bluegreen VOI inventory which was sold during the period and relieved from inventory. Cost of VOIs sold was $6.7 million and $8.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and represented 15% and 14%, respectively, of sales of VOIs. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, cost of VOIs sold was $13.9 million and $11.2 million, respectively and represented 17% and 13%, respectively, of sales of VOIs. Cost of VOIs varies between periods based on the sales volumes, the relative costs of the specific VOIs sold in each respective period and the size of the point package of the VOIs sold.

78


Table of Contents

Real Estate
Fee-Based Sales Commission Revenue. Bluegreen earns commissions for the sales of third-party inventory upon the closing of the respective sales transaction.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Bluegreen sold $27.0 million and $18.2 million, respectively, of third-party developer inventory and earned sales and marketing commissions of $18.3 million and $12.1 million, respectively. Based on an allocation of our selling, marketing and field general and administrative expenses to these sales, we believe we generated approximately $4.6 million and $2.4 million in pre-tax profits from these sales and marketing fee-based services during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Bluegreen sold $43.9 million and $34.0 million, respectively, of third-party developer inventory and earned sales and marketing commissions of $29.1 million and $22.3 million, respectively. Based on an allocation of our selling, marketing and field general and administrative expenses to these sales, we believe we generated approximately $5.8 million and $3.2 million in pre-tax profits by providing these sales and marketing fee-based services during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The increase in the sales of third-party developer inventory is a result of Bluegreen’s strategic expansion of its fee-based service business. Bluegreen anticipates that fee-based services will be a greater portion of Bluegreen’s revenues in the future although Bluegreen’s efforts in this respect may not be successful.
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Selling and marketing expenses for Bluegreen Resorts were $35.0 million and $35.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As a percentage of system-wide sales, net, selling and marketing expenses decreased to 45% during the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 47% during the three months ended June 30, 2010. Selling and marketing expenses were $63.5 million and $62.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As a percentage of system-wide sales, net, selling and marketing expenses decreased to 47% during the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 52% during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
The decrease in the sales and marketing expense as a percentage of system-wide sales, net, during the 2011 periods was due to the fluctuations in the mix of marketing programs, reflecting a reduction in the number of sales tours from higher cost programs, as well as an increase in the average sales price per VOI transaction. The average sales price was $12,250 and $11,990, during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and was $12,189 and $11,842, during the six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010 respectively.
Net Carrying Costs of Developer Inventory. Bluegreen is responsible for paying maintenance fees and developer subsidies for unsold Bluegreen VOI inventory, which is paid to the property owners’ associations that maintain the resorts. Bluegreen attempts to mitigate this expense, to the extent possible, through the rental of its owned VOIs. Accordingly, the net carrying cost of Bluegreen’s unsold inventory fluctuates with the number of VOIs Bluegreen owns and the number of resorts subject to developer subsidy arrangements, as well as proceeds from rental and sampler activity. During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the carrying cost of Bluegreen’s inventory was $6.2 million and $5.8 million, respectively, and was partially offset by rental and sampler revenues, net of expenses, of $3.3 million and $4.0 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the carrying cost of Bluegreen’s inventory was $13.0 million and $11.6 million, respectively, and was partially offset by rental and sampler revenues, net of expenses, of $5.9 million and $6.3 million, respectively. The decrease in rental proceeds in the 2011 periods is partially attributable to a higher percentage of Bluegreen’s unsold VOIs being used to house marketing guests.
Field General and Administrative Expenses. Field general and administrative expenses, which represent expenses directly attributable to Bluegreen Resorts operations (and exclude corporate overhead) were $4.6 million and $4.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and were $8.6 million and $6.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As a percentage of system-wide sales, net, field general and administrative expenses increased slightly to 6% during the three months ended June 30, 2011from 5% during the six months ended June 30, 2010. As a percentage of system-wide sales, net, field general and administrative expenses increased to 6% during the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 5% during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

79


Table of Contents

Real Estate
Other Fee-Based Services
          The following table sets forth pre-tax profit generated by Bluegreen’s resort management and other services (in thousands):
                                 
         
    For the Three Months Ended June 30,     For the Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Fee-based management services
  $ 7,208       6,651       13,922       12,940  
Title Operations
    1,099       1,572       2,725       3,043  
Other
    (251 )     (82 )     (330 )     (96 )
 
                       
Total fee-based service profit
    8,056       8,141       16,317       15,887  
 
                       
Other Resort Fee-Based Services Revenue. Bluegreen’s other resort fee-based services revenue consists primarily of fees earned for providing management services and fees earned for providing title services in connection with VOI transactions. Bluegreen provided management services to the Bluegreen Vacation Club and to a majority of the property owners’ associations of our resorts. In connection with our management services provided to the Bluegreen Vacation Club, we manage the club reservation system, and provide owner services as well as billing and collections services.
Revenues generated by other resort fee-based services were $17.3 million and $16.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $34.5 million and $32.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Revenues related to other resort fee-based services increased in 2011 as we provided services to more VOI owners and managed more timeshare resorts on behalf of property owners’ associations during the 2011 periods. As of June 30, 2011, Bluegreen managed 45timeshare resort properties and hotels compared to 43 as of June 30, 2010. Fees earned from title services decreased in 2011 compared to 2010 as a result of an initiative which was implemented in 2010 to reduce Bluegreen’s processing back-log that had the impact of increasing 2010 revenues.
Bluegreen intends to continue to pursue its efforts to provide resort management and title services to resort developers and others, on a cash-fee basis. While Bluegreen’s efforts to do so may not be successful, we hope that this will become an increasing portion of Bluegreen’s business over time.
Cost of Other Resort Fee-Based Services. Cost of other resort fee-based services was $9.2 million and $8.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Cost of other fee-based services was $18.2 million and $16.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in the cost during the 2011periods is due to the additional service volumes described above.
Interest Income and Interest Expense
Notes Receivable Portfolio. As of June 30, 2011 and 2010, Bluegreen’s net interest spread from its notes receivable portfolio included the interest earned on $693.6 million and $616.1 million of VOI notes receivable, respectively, net of interest expense incurred on $515.4 million and $592.5 million of related receivable-backed debt, respectively. The following table details the sources of interest income and related interest expense associated with our notes receivable portfolio (in thousands):
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,        
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Interest income:
                               
VOI notes receivable
  $ 21,810       23,534       44,063       47,609  
Other
    164       145       344       284  
 
                       
Total interest income
    21,974       23,679       44,407       47,893  
 
                       
Interest expense:
                               
Receivable-backed notes payable
    9,529       11,990       19,526       23,726  
 
                       
Net interest on notes receivable portfolio
  $ 12,445       11,689       24,881       24,167  
 
                       
Interest Income. Interest income was $22.0 million and $23.7 million during the second quarters of 2011 and

80


Table of Contents

Real Estate
2010, respectively. Interest income was $44.4 million and $47.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in interest income during the 2011 periods compared to the same periods of 2010 was a result of the continued decrease in our VOI notes receivable portfolio, which in turn was due to both the maturing of the portfolio as well as our efforts to increase cash sales and collect higher down payments on those VOI sales that we do finance. Bluegreen expects that its notes receivable portfolio will continue to decrease in the near term due to these factors.
Interest Expense. Interest expense on receivable-backed notes payable was $9.5 million and $12.0 million for the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Interest expense on receivable-backed notes payable was $19.5 million and $23.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our other interest expense, which is primarily comprised of interest on lines of credit and notes payable and on our subordinated debentures, was $4.8 million and $3.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $10.0 million and $6.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Bluegreen’s total interest expense, which includes interest expense on receivable-backed notes payable and interest on lines of credit, notes payable and subordinated debentures, was $14.4 million and $15.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $29.5 million and $30.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Interest expense decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same periods of 2010 due to the lower outstanding average debt balance during the 2011 periods as a result of debt repayments, partially offset by slightly higher average interest rates. Bluegreen’s effective cost of borrowing was 7.6% and 7.3% during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Mortgage Servicing Operations. Bluegreen’s mortgage servicing operations include processing payments, and collection of notes receivable owned by Bluegreen, as well as on notes receivable owned by third parties. In addition, Bluegreen’s mortgage servicing operations facilitate the monetization of its VOI notes receivable through its various credit facilities, as well as perform monthly reporting activities for Bluegreen’s lenders and receivable investors. The cost of Bluegreen’s mortgage servicing operations was $1.3 million and $1.1 million during the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The cost of Bluegreen’s mortgage servicing operations was $2.5 million and $2.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Bluegreen earns loan servicing fees from our securitization and securitization-type transactions as well as from providing loan servicing to third-party developers. The loan servicing fees that we earn on our securitization and securitization-type transactions are included as a component of interest income on notes receivable as we consolidate the VIEs that hold the notes receivable and related debt (see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). Servicing fee income earned for servicing the loan portfolio of two of Bluegreen’s third-party developers in connection with our fee-based service arrangements was approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of June 30, 2011, the total amount of notes receivable serviced by Bluegreen under these arrangements was $30.2 million.
Corporate General and Administrative Expenses. Bluegreen’s corporate general and administrative expenses consist primarily of expenses associated with administering the various support functions at Bluegreen’s corporate headquarters to support Bluegreen’s business operations, including accounting, human resources, information technology, treasury, and legal. Overall corporate and general administrative costs may fluctuate between periods for various reasons, including but not limited to the timing of professional services and litigation expenses. In addition, consistent with Bluegreen’s segment reporting treatment, changes in the accrued payroll between reporting periods for the entire company are recorded as corporate general and administrative expense.
Corporate general and administrative expenses were $10.3 million and $9.7 million for the first quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Corporate general and administrative expenses were $20.8 million and $22.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in the expenses during the 2011 periods primarily relates to lower litigation costs and lower costs incurred for management consulting services.
Non-controlling Interest in Income of Consolidated Subsidiary. We include the results of operations and financial position of Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations, LLC, our 51%-owned subsidiary, in our consolidated financial statements. The non-controlling interests in income of consolidated subsidiary is the portion of our consolidated pre-tax income that is attributable to Big Cedar, LLC, the unaffiliated 49% interest holder in Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations, LLC. Non-controlling interest in income of consolidated subsidiary was $2.0 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Non-controlling interest in income of consolidated subsidiary was $3.7 million and $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

81


Table of Contents

Real Estate
Provision (benefit) for Income Taxes. Bluegreen’s effective income tax rate was approximately 39% and 38.0% during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Bluegreen’s quarterly effective income tax rates are based upon Bluegreen’s current estimated annual rate. Bluegreen’s annual effective income tax rate varies based upon its taxable earnings as well as on its mix of taxable earnings in the various states in which Bluegreen operates.
Discontinued Operations. On March 24, 2011, Bluegreen announced that it had engaged advisors to explore strategic alternatives for Bluegreen Communities, including a possible sale of the division. On June 30, 2011, Bluegreen’s Board of Directors made a determination to seek to sell Bluegreen Communities or substantially all of its assets. As a result of this decision, it was determined that Bluegreen Communities met the criteria for classification as discontinued operations. Accordingly, the operating results of Bluegreen Communities, which had previously been presented as a separate reporting segment, are included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations (See Note 4 of the “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” for further information). In addition, the majority of the assets related to Bluegreen Communities are presented separately on the consolidated balance sheets as “assets held for sale.” The assets held for sale primarily consist of Bluegreen Communities real estate assets valued on our books at $31.8 million and $83.8 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. This decrease in the carrying amount of the assets held for sale as of June 30, 2011 as compared to December 31, 2010, primarily related to the $52.4 million non-cash charge described below recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2011 to write down the value of the Bluegreen Communities’ assets in the disposal group to estimated fair value less cost to sell.
     Below are the results of discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 (in thousands):
                 
    For the Three Months     For the Three Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
Revenue from discontinued operations
  $ 4,170       2,671  
Costs of discontinued operations
    4,325       6,985  
Loss on assets held for sale
    52,733        
Interest expense
    772       1,120  
 
           
Loss from discontinued operations before benefit for income taxes
    (53,660 )     (5,434 )
Benefit for income taxes
    20,634       1,685  
 
           
Loss from discontinued operations
  $ (33,026 )     (3,749 )
 
           
 
    For the Six Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
Revenue from discontinued operations
  $ 9,893       6,268  
Costs of discontinued operations
    10,068       15,724  
Loss on assets held for sale
    52,733        
Interest expense
    1,532       2,288  
 
           
Loss from discontinued operations before benefit for income taxes
    (54,440 )     (11,744 )
Benefit for income taxes
    20,986       4,653  
 
           
Loss from discontinued operations
  $ (33,454 )     (7,091 )
 
           
Revenues from discontinued operations, which primarily relate to sales of communities real estate, were $4.2 million and $2.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $9.9 million and $6.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in the revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was due to the recognition of previously deferred revenue related to one of our communities in which we substantially completed development during the first quarter of 2011.
Cost of discontinued operations was $4.3 million and $7.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $10.1 million and $15.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Cost of discontinued operations primarily consists of cost of sales of real estate, expenses in connection with the operation of two golf courses, selling and marketing expenses, and general and administrative expenses. Cost of discontinued operations during the six months ended June 30, 2010, also includes non-cash impairment charges of approximately $3.3 million to write down certain phases of the completed communities properties to their

82


Table of Contents

Real Estate
fair value less costs to sell, incurred as a result of continued low volume of sales, reduced prices and the impact of reduced sales on the forecasted sellout period of the communities projects.
Loss on assets held for sale during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, mainly consists of a non-cash charge of $52.4 million to write down the carrying value of the assets held for sale to fair value less cost to sell. See Note 4of the “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements” for further information. Additional losses, which may be significant, may be incurred in the future to the extent that actual sales proceeds from the disposition of the disposal group are materially different from their estimated fair value.
Discontinued operations also includes interest expense on notes payable which are collateralized by certain Bluegreen Communities inventory and property and equipment assets as such debt is required to be paid in full upon the sale of the related assets. Interest expense was $0.8 million and $1.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Interest expense was $1.5 million and $2.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Interest expense decreased during the 2011 periods due to lower debt balances as a result of debt repayments. Bluegreen recently entered into a non-binding letter of intent with a third party contemplating the sale of Bluegreen Communities, or a similar transaction. However, as of the date of this filing, Bluegreen has not entered into a definitive agreement or agreements with respect to the sale of Bluegreen Communities or its assets, and Bluegreen may not be successful in its efforts to consummate any such sale or sales.
Bluegreen’s Liquidity and Capital Resources
Bluegreen’s primary sources of funds from internal operations are: (i) cash sales, (ii) down payments on homesite and VOI sales which are financed, (iii) proceeds from the sale of, or borrowings collateralized by, notes receivable, including cash received from our residual interests in such transactions, (iv) cash from our finance operations, including mortgage servicing fees and principal and interest payments received on the purchase money mortgage loans arising from sales of VOIs and homesites, and (v) net cash generated from our sales and marketing fee-based services and other resort fee-based services, including our resorts management operations.
As a result of initiatives implemented in the fourth quarter of 2008, Bluegreen has in recent years realized higher down payments and a higher percentage of cash sales in connection with VOI sales compared to prior years. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, including down payments received on financed sales, 57% of our VOI sales were paid in cash within approximately 30 days from the contract date.
While the vacation ownership business has historically been capital intensive, Bluegreen principal goals in the current environment has been to emphasize the generation of “free cash flow” (defined as cash flow from operating and investing activities) by i) incentivizing Bluegreen’s sales associates to generate higher percentages of our sales in cash compared to historical levels; ii) maintaining sales volumes that allows Bluegreen to focus on what it believes to be the most efficient marketing channels available to it; iii) minimizing capital and inventory expenditures; and iv) utilizing our sales and marketing, mortgage servicing, resort management services, title and construction expertise to pursue fee-based-service business relationships that require minimal up-front capital investment and have the potential to produce strong cash flows for Bluegreen.
Historically, Bluegreen’s business model has depended on the availability of credit in the commercial markets. VOI sales are generally dependent upon us providing financing to our buyers. Our ability to sell and/or borrow against our notes receivable from VOI buyers has been a critical factor in our continued liquidity. When we sell VOIs, a financed buyer is only required to pay a minimum of 10% to 20% of the purchase price in cash at the time of sale; however, selling, marketing, and administrative expenses attributable to the sale are primarily cash expenses that generally exceed the buyer’s minimum required down-payment. Accordingly, having financing facilities available for the hypothecation, sale, or transfer of these VOI receivables has been a critical factor in our ability to meet our short and long-term cash needs and Bluegreen has attempted to diversify our sources of such financing facilities. Historically, Bluegreen has relied on its ability to sell receivables in the term securitization market in order to generate liquidity and create capacity in our receivable facilities. In addition, maintaining adequate VOI inventory to sell and pursue growth into new markets has historically required Bluegreen to incur debt for the acquisition, construction and development of new resorts. Although Bluegreen believes that it currently has adequate completed VOIs in inventory to satisfy our needs for the next several years, and therefore, expect acquisition and development expenditures to remain at current levels in the near term, Bluegreen may decide to acquire or develop more inventory in the future, which would increase its acquisition and development expenditures and may require Bluegreen to incur additional debt.

83


Table of Contents

Real Estate
The challenging credit markets over the past several years have negatively impacted Bluegreen financing activities. While the credit markets appear to be recovering and Bluegreen consummated term securitizations and entered into new financing facilities during 2010 as well as renewed and expanded certain of its facilities during the six months ended June 30, 2011, the number of banks and other finance companies willing to provide “warehouse” lines of credit for timeshare receivables has decreased. As a result, Bluegreen may not be able to renew its existing receivable-backed lines of credit when their current advance periods expire or secure new future financing for our VOI notes receivable on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, the securitization market has become unavailable for extended periods of time in the past and may become unavailable to Bluegreen in the future.
Further, while Bluegreen may seek to raise additional debt or equity financing in the future to fund operations or repay outstanding debt, such financing may not be available to Bluegreen on favorable terms or at all. If Bluegreen efforts are unsuccessful, its liquidity would be significantly adversely impacted. In light of the current trading price of Bluegreen’s common stock, financing involving the issuance of its common stock or securities convertible into its common stock would be highly dilutive to Bluegreen’s existing shareholders.
Bluegreen’s levels of debt and debt service requirements have several important effects on our operations, including the following: (i) our significant debt service cash requirements reduce the funds available for operations and future business opportunities and increases our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions, as well as conditions in the credit markets, generally; (ii) our leverage position increases our vulnerability to economic and competitive pressures; (iii) the financial covenants and other restrictions contained in indentures, credit agreements and other agreements relating to our indebtedness require us to meet certain financial tests and restrict our ability to, among other things, borrow additional funds, dispose of assets, make investments, or pay cash dividends on or repurchase common stock; and (iv) our leverage position may limit funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate purposes. Certain of our financing arrangements materially limit our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock or our ability to repurchase shares in the near term. Certain of our competitors operate on a less leveraged basis and have greater operating and financial flexibility than we do.
Credit Facilities
The following is a discussion of Bluegreen’s material purchase and credit facilities, including those that were important sources of its liquidity as of June 30, 2011. These facilities do not constitute all of Bluegreen’s outstanding indebtedness as of June 30, 2011. Bluegreen’s other indebtedness includes outstanding junior subordinated debentures, borrowings collateralized by real estate inventories that were not incurred pursuant to a significant credit facility, and capital leases.

84


Table of Contents

Real Estate
Credit Facilities for Bluegreen Receivables with Future Availability
Bluegreen maintains various credit facilities with financial institutions that provide receivable financing for our operations. We had the following credit facilities with future availability as of June 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
                                 
            Outstanding                  
            Balance             Advance Period   Borrowing Rate;
            as of June 30,     Availability as of     Expiration;   Rate as of June 30,
    Borrowing Limit     2011     June 30, 2011     Borrowing Maturity   2011
BB&T Purchase Facility(1)
  $ 75,000     $ 11,221     $ 63,779     December 2011;
September 2023
  Prime Rate +2.00%(2); 5.25%
Quorum Purchase Facility
    20,000       3,183       16,817     December 2011;
December 2030
  8.00%
NBA Receivables Facility(3)
    20,000       19,236       764     October 2011;
October 2018(6)
  30 day LIBOR+5.25%; 6.75%(4)
2011 Liberty Bank Facility(1)(3)
    60,000       5,980       11,833     February 2013;
February 2016
  Prime Rate +2.25%; 6.50%(5)
 
                         
 
  $ 175,000     $ 39,620     $ 93,193          
 
                         
 
(1)   Facility is revolving during the advance period, providing additional availability as the facility is paid down, subject to eligible collateral and applicable terms and conditions.
 
(2)   The borrowing rate is subject to tiered increases once the outstanding balance equals or exceeds $25.0 million, subject to a maximum interest rate of the Prime Rate plus 3.5%, once the outstanding balance under the facility equals or exceeds $50.0 million.
 
(3)   In February 2011, we entered into a new revolving hypothecation facility with certain existing participants in the Liberty-led syndicate. The availability under the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility is reduced by the amounts outstanding to the extending participants under the 2008 Liberty Bank Facility, as the aggregate amount outstanding to such participants under the 2008 Liberty Bank Facility and the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility at any point in time cannot exceed $60.0 million. The amount outstanding under the 2008 Liberty Bank Facility to the extending participants was $42.2 million as of June 30, 2011.
 
(4)   Interest charged on this facility is subject to a floor of 6.75%
 
(5)   Interest charged on this facility is subject to a floor of 6.50%
 
(6)   In May 2011, the facility was amended to allow us to pledge additional timeshare receivables through October 31, 2011, with additional advances not to exceed $5.0 million, subject to a total $20.0 million borrowing limit for all amounts outstanding under the facility. The unpaid balance related to the initial advance, of which $15.3 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2011, matures on September 30, 2017.The unpaid balance related to all additional advances of which $3.9 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2011, matures on October 31, 2018.
BB&T Purchase Facility. Bluegreen has a $75.0 million timeshare notes receivable purchase facility with Branch Banking and Trust Company (“BB&T”) (the “BB&T Purchase Facility”). The BB&T Purchase Facility provides a revolving advance period through December 17, 2011. The interest rates on future advances under the facility are the Prime Rate plus 2.0%, subject to tiered increases once the outstanding balance equals or exceeds $25.0 million, with a maximum interest rate of the Prime Rate plus 3.5% once the outstanding balance equals or exceeds $50.0 million. Bluegreen receives all of the excess cash flows generated by the timeshare receivables transferred to BB&T under the facility (excess meaning after customary payment of fees, interest and principal under the facility) provided we are in compliance with covenants and terms of the BB&T Purchase Facility. The BB&T Purchase Facility provides for the financing of Bluegreen’s timeshare receivables at an advance rate of 67.5%, subject to the terms of the facility.
While ownership of the receivables is transferred for legal purposes, the transfers of receivables under the facility are accounted for as secured borrowings. Accordingly, the receivables are reflected as assets and the associated obligations are reflected as liabilities on our balance sheet. The BB&T Purchase Facility is nonrecourse and is not guaranteed by Bluegreen.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen pledged $17.0 million of VOI notes receivable to this facility and received cash proceeds of $11.5 million. We also repaid $0.3 million on the facility.
Quorum Purchase Facility. On December 22, 2010, Bluegreen entered into a timeshare receivables purchase facility (the “Quorum Purchase Facility”) with Quorum Federal Credit Union (“Quorum”). Pursuant to the terms of the facility and subject to certain conditions precedent, Quorum has agreed to purchase eligible timeshare receivables from us or certain of our subsidiaries up to an aggregate $20.0 million purchase price through December 22, 2011. The terms of the Quorum Purchase Facility reflect an 80% advance rate and a program fee rate of 8% per annum through August 31, 2011, and terms to be agreed upon through December 22, 2011. Eligibility requirements for receivables sold include, among others, that the obligors under the timeshare notes receivable sold be members of Quorum at the time of the note sale. The Quorum Purchase Facility contemplates the ability of Quorum to purchase

85


Table of Contents

Real Estate
additional receivables subject to advance rates, fees and other terms to be agreed upon from time to time over and above the initial $20.0 million commitment, pursuant to the terms of the facility and subject to certain conditions precedent. Subject to performance of the collateral, Bluegreen will receive all of the excess cash flows generated by the receivables transferred to Quorum under the facility (excess meaning after payment of customary fees and return of amounts invested by Quorum under the facility on a pro-rata basis as borrowers make payments on their timeshare loans).
While ownership of the receivables is transferred for legal purposes, the transfers of receivables under the facility are accounted for as secured borrowings. Accordingly, the receivables are reflected as assets and the associated obligations are reflected as liabilities on Bluegreen’s balance sheet. The Quorum Purchase Facility is nonrecourse and is not guaranteed by us.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen pledged $4.0 million of VOI notes receivable to this facility and received cash proceeds of $3.2 million. Bluegreen also repaid $0.1 million on the facility.
NBA Receivables Facility. In September 2010, Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture entered into a $20.0 million timeshare receivables hypothecation facility with NBA (“NBA”). Bluegreen Corporation has guaranteed the full payment and performance of Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture in connection with this facility. The facility provides an 85% advance on eligible receivables, subject to terms and conditions which we believe to be customary for facilities of this type. At the time of closing of the transaction, $23.5 million of eligible receivables were pledged and we received an advance of $20 million. . The availability period under the facility had expired on June 30, 2010; however, the facility was amended during May 2011 to allow us to pledge additional timeshare receivables through October 31, 2011, with additional advances not to exceed $5.0 million, subject to a total $20.0 million borrowing limit for all amounts outstanding under the facility.
All principal and interest payments received on pledged receivables are applied to principal and interest due under the facility. Indebtedness under this facility bears interest at the 30-day LIBOR plus 5.25%, subject to a floor of 6.75% (6.75% as of June 30, 2011).
The unpaid balance related to the initial September 30, 2010 advance, of which $15.3 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2011, matures on September 30, 2017; the unpaid balance related to the additional advances of which $3.9 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2011, matures on October 31, 2018.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen pledged $4.6 million of VOI notes receivable to this facility and received cash proceeds of approximately $3.9 million. Bluegreen also repaid $3.0 million on this facility.
2011 Liberty Bank Facility. In February 2011, Bluegreen entered into a new revolving hypothecation facility with certain participants in our 2008 Liberty Bank Facility (see discussion of our 2008 Liberty Bank Facility below, under Other Outstanding Receivable-Backed Notes Payable). This new $60.0 million facility (“2011 Liberty Bank Facility”) provides for an 85% advance on eligible receivables pledged under the facility during a two-year period ending in February 2013, subject to eligible collateral and terms and conditions we believe to be customary for transactions of this type. Availability under the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility is reduced by amounts outstanding to certain syndicate participants under the 2008 Liberty Bank Facility ($42.2 million as of June 30, 2011), but as the outstanding amounts on the 2008 Liberty Bank Facility amortize over time, the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility will revolve up to $60.0 million. Principal and interest are repaid as cash is collected on the pledged receivables, with the remaining balance due in February 2016. Indebtedness under the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility bears interest at the Prime Rate plus 2.25%, subject to a floor of 6.5% (6.5% as of June 30, 2011).
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen pledged $7.9 million of VOI notes receivable to this facility and received cash proceeds of approximately $6.7 million, of which Bluegreen repaid $0.7 million.

86


Table of Contents

Real Estate
Other Outstanding Receivable-Backed Notes Payable
Bluegreen has outstanding obligations under various receivable-backed credit facilities that have no remaining future availability as the advance periods have expired. Bluegreen had the following outstanding balances under such credit facilities as of June 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
                 
                Borrowing Rate;
    Balance as of     Borrowing   Rate as of June 30,
    June 30, 2011     Maturity   2011
 
              Prime + 2.25%;
2008 Liberty Bank Facility
  $ 57,528     August 2014   6.50%(1)
 
               
 
              30 day LIBOR+1.75%;
GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Facility
    19,531     April, 2016   1.94%
 
               
Legacy Securitization (2)
    18,941     September 2025   12.00%
 
               
 
              30 day LIBOR+4.00%;
RFA Receivables Facility
    2,177     February 2015   4.19%
 
               
Non-recourse Securitization Debt
    379,436     Varies   Varies
 
             
 
  $ 477,613          
 
             
 
(1)   Interest charged on this facility is subject to a floor of 6.50%
 
(2)   Legacy Securitization debt bears interest at a coupon rate of 12% and was issued at a discount resulting in an effective yield of 18.5%. The associated debt balance is presented net of the discount of $2.1 million.
2008 Liberty Bank Facility. Bluegreen has a $75.0 million revolving timeshare receivables hypothecation facility with a syndicate of lenders led by Liberty Bank and assembled by Wellington Financial (“2008 Liberty Bank Facility”). Amounts borrowed under the facility and incurred interest are repaid as cash is collected on the pledged receivables. The advance period under the 2008 Liberty Bank Facility has expired, and all outstanding borrowings are scheduled to mature no later than August 27, 2014. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen repaid $10.0 million on this facility.
In February 2011, Bluegreen entered into the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility, a new revolving hypothecation facility with certain existing participants in the Liberty-led syndicate. See Credit Facilities for Bluegreen Receivables with Future Availability above for further information regarding the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility.
The GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Receivables Facility. In April 2007, the Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture entered into a $45.0 million revolving VOI receivables credit facility with GE (the “GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Receivables Facility”). Bluegreen Corporation has guaranteed the full payment and performance of the Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture in connection with the GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Receivables Facility. The advance period under this facility expired on April 16, 2009, and all outstanding borrowings are scheduled to mature no later than April 16, 2016. The facility includes affirmative, negative and financial covenants and events of default. All principal and interest payments received on pledged receivables are applied to principal and interest due under the facility. Indebtedness under the facility bears interest adjusted monthly at a rate equal to the 30 day LIBOR rate plus 1.75%. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen repaid $4.3 million on this facility.
Legacy Securitization. In September 2010, Bluegreen completed a securitization transaction of the lowest FICO®-score loans previously financed in the BB&T Purchase Facility. Substantially all of the timeshare receivables included in this transaction were generated prior to December 15, 2008, the date that Bluegreen implemented its FICO® score-based credit underwriting program, and had FICO® scores below 600.
In this securitization, BXG Legacy 2010 LLC, a wholly-owned special purpose subsidiary of Bluegreen Corporation, issued $27.0 million of notes payable secured by a portfolio of timeshare receivables totaling $36.1 million. While the notes payable have a coupon rate of 12%, they were sold at a $2.7 million discount to yield an

87


Table of Contents

Real Estate
effective rate of 18.5%. The notes payable generated gross proceeds to us of $24.3 million (before fees and reserves and expenses we believe to be customary for transactions of this type), which were used to repay a portion of the outstanding balance under the BB&T Purchase Facility.
Bluegreen guaranteed the principal payments for defaulted vacation ownership loans in the Legacy Securitization at amounts equivalent to the then-current advance rate inherent in the notes, any shortfalls in monthly interest distributions to the Legacy Securitization investors and any shortfall in the ultimate principal payment on the notes upon their stated maturity in September 2025. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen repaid $4.3 million on this facility.
Credit Facilities for Bluegreen Inventories without Existing Future Availability
Bluegreen has outstanding obligations under various credit facilities and other notes payable collateralized by our Bluegreen Resorts or Bluegreen Communities inventories. As of June 30, 2011, these included the following significant items (dollars in thousands):
                 
    Balance as of June     Borrowing   Borrowing Rate; Rate
    30, 2011     Maturity(1)   as of June 30, 2011
RFA AD&C Facility
  $ 44,124     June 2012   30 day LIBOR+4.50%;
4.69%
 
               
H4BG Communities
              Prime + 2.00%;
Facility
    27,412     December 2012 (4)   8.00% (3)
 
               
Foundation Capital
    13,083     October 2015   8% (5); 8%
 
               
 
              Prime + 1.25 - 1.50%;
Textron AD&C Facility
    6,474     Varies by loan (2)   4.50% — 4.75%
 
               
 
              30 day LIBOR + 6.87%;
Wells Fargo Term Loan
    24,953     April 2012   7.06%
Other Lines of Credit and Notes Payable
    5,193     Varies   Varies
 
             
 
  $ 121,239          
 
             
 
(1)   Repayment of the outstanding amount is effected through release payments as the related collateral is sold, subject to periodic minimum required amortization between June 30, 2011 and maturity.
 
(2)   The maturity dates for this facility vary by loan as discussed below.
 
(3)   The interest rate on this facility is subject to the following floors: (1) 8.0% until the balance of the loan is less than or equal to $20 million, and (2) 6.0% thereafter.
 
(4)   This facility is secured by certain Bluegreen Communities real property homesites and property and equipment assets and will become due and payable upon the sale of the related assets, if consummated prior to the note maturity date.
 
(5)   The borrowing rate under this facility is fixed at 8% through October 2013 and changes thereafter to Prime Rate plus 4.75% or the lender specified rate, not to exceed 9%.
RFA AD&C Facility. In September 2010, GMAC assigned all rights, title, and interest in this facility (previously known as GMAC AD&C Facility) to Resort Finance America, LLC (“RFA”). This assignment did not affect any of the material financial terms of the loan agreement. This facility was used to finance the acquisition and development of certain of our resorts and currently has one outstanding project loan. The maturity date for the project loan collateralized by our Bluegreen Club 36TM resort in Las Vegas, Nevada (the “Club 36 Loan”) and is scheduled to mature on June 30, 2012. Approximately $44.1 million was outstanding on the Club 36 Loan as of June 30, 2011, $21.5 million of which is due by October 31, 2011. Principal payments are effected through agreed-upon release prices as timeshare interests in Bluegreen Club 36 are sold, subject to periodic minimum required amortization. As of June 30, 2011, we had no availability under this facility.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen repaid $8.1 million of the outstanding balance under this facility, including the repayment in full of a loan collateralized by our Fountains Resort in Orlando, Florida.

88


Table of Contents

Real Estate
H4BG Communities Facility. The H4BG Communities Facility is secured by the real property homesites (and personal property related thereto) at the following Bluegreen Communities projects (the “Secured Projects”): Havenwood at Hunter’s Crossing (New Braunfels, Texas); The Bridges at Preston Crossings (Grayson County, Texas); King Oaks (College Station, Texas); Vintage Oaks at the Vineyard (New Braunfels, Texas); and Sanctuary Cove at St. Andrews Sound (Waverly, Georgia). In addition, the H4BG Communities Facility is secured by the following golf courses: The Bridges at Preston Crossings (Grayson County, Texas) and Sanctuary Cove (Waverly, Georgia).
Principal payments are effected through agreed-upon release prices as real estate collateralizing the H4BG Communities Facility is sold, subject to minimum required amortization. The interest rate on the H4BG Communities Facility is the Prime Rate plus 2.0%, subject to the following floors: (1) 8.0% until the balance of the loan is less than or equal to $20 million, and (2) 6.0% thereafter. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we repaid $3.4 million of the outstanding balance under this facility. The facility is scheduled to mature on December 31, 2012, however, if the related assets are sold prior to the scheduled maturity date, the facility will mature upon the sale of the assets.
Textron AD&C Facility. In April 2008, Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. (“BVU”), our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a $75.0 million, revolving master acquisition, development and construction facility loan agreement (the “Textron AD&C Facility”) with Textron Financial Corporation (“Textron”). The Textron AD&C Facility has historically been used to facilitate the borrowing of funds for resort acquisition and development activities. We have guaranteed all sub-loans under the master agreement. Interest on the Textron AD&C Facility is equal to the Prime Rate plus 1.25% — 1.50% and is due monthly. The advance period under the Textron AD&C Facility has expired.
On October 28, 2009, Bluegreen entered into an amendment to the Textron AD&C Facility and a sub-loan under the facility used to fund the acquisition and development of our Odyssey Dells Resort (the “Odyssey Sub-Loan”). The amendment to the Odyssey Sub-Loan extended the final maturity of outstanding borrowings under the Odyssey Sub-Loan to December 31, 2011, and revised the periodic minimum required principal amortization. We pay Textron principal payments as we sell timeshare interests that collateralize the Odyssey Sub-Loan, subject to periodic minimum required principal amortization. As amended, our minimum required principal payments are $1.0 million per quarter through maturity. As of June 30, 2011, Bluegreen outstanding borrowings under the Odyssey Sub-Loan totaled approximately $2.0 million.
Bluegreen also has a sub-loan under the Textron AD&C Facility which we used to acquire our Atlantic Palace Resort in Atlantic City, New Jersey (the “Atlantic Palace Sub-Loan”). The outstanding balance under the Atlantic Palace Sub-Loan was $4.5 million as of June 30, 2011. Bluegreen pays Textron principal payments as we sell timeshare interests that collateralize the Atlantic Palace Sub-Loan, subject to periodic minimum required principal amortization. The final maturity of outstanding borrowings under the Atlantic Palace Sub-Loan is April 2013.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen repaid $2.8 million under this facility.
Wells Fargo Term Loan. On April 30, 2010, Bluegreen entered into a definitive agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), which amended, restated and consolidated our then existing notes payable and line-of-credit with Wachovia Bank, N.A. into a single term loan with Wells Fargo (the “Wells Fargo Term Loan”). Under the terms of the agreement, principal payments are effected through agreed-upon release prices as real estate collateralizing the Wells Fargo Term Loan is sold, subject to minimum remaining required amortization as of June 30, 2011 of $4.8 million in 2011 and $20.2 million in 2012. In addition to the resort projects previously pledged as collateral for the various notes payable to Wachovia, Bluegreen pledged additional timeshare interests, resorts real estate, and the residual interests in certain of our sold VOI notes receivable as collateral for the Wells Fargo Term Loan. As required by the terms of the Wells Fargo Term Loan, Wells Fargo received, as additional collateral, the residual interest in a term securitization transaction Bluegreen completed in December 2010. The Wells Fargo Term Loan bears interest at the 30-day LIBOR plus 6.87% (7.06% as of June 30, 2011).
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Bluegreen repaid $5.8 million of the outstanding balance under this facility.

89


Table of Contents

Real Estate
Commitments
Bluegreen’s material commitments as of June 30, 2011 included the required payments due on its receivable-backed debt, lines-of-credit and other notes payable, commitments to complete its Bluegreen Resorts and Communities projects based on our sales contracts with customers and commitments under noncancelable operating leases.
The following tables summarize the contractual minimum principal and interest payments, respectively, net of unamortized discount, required on all of Bluegreen outstanding debt (including our receivable-backed debt, lines-of-credit and other notes and debentures payable) and our noncancelable operating leases by period date, as of June 30, 2011, (in thousands):
                                                 
            Purchase                          
            Accounting     Lesss than     13-36     37-60     More than  
Category   Total     Adjustments     12 months     Months     Months     60 Months  
Long Term Debt Obligations (1)(2)
  $ 693,849       (55,450 )     80,607       25,812       107,010       535,870  
Operating Lease Obligations
    54,823             8,669       12,043       10,268       23,843  
     
Total Obligations
  $ 748,672       (55,450 )     89,276       37,855       117,278       559,713  
     
 
(1)   Legacy Securitization payments included in the Receivable-backed notes payable after 5 years are presented net of a discount of $2.1 million.
 
(2)   The payments of $6.9 million and $20.6 million for less than one year period and one-to-three year periods, respectively, relate to the H4BG Communities Facility. If the related collateralized assets are sold, however, the debt will become due and payable upon the sale of the respective assets. Additionally, approximately $0.3 million, presented within payments after 5 years, relates to other notes payable which will also become due and payable upon the sale of the assets of the Communities business that secure this facility.
Bluegreen estimates that the cash required to satisfy its Bluegreen Resorts development obligations related to resort buildings and resort amenities was approximately $7.0 million as of June 30, 2011. Bluegreen estimates that the cash required to satisfy its development obligations related to Bluegreen Communities’ projects was approximately $5.0 million as of June 30, 2011. These estimates assume that Bluegreen is not obligated to develop any building, project or amenity in which a commitment has not been made pursuant to a sales contract with a customer or other obligations; however, Bluegreen anticipates that it will incur such obligations in the future. Bluegreen plans to fund these expenditures over the next three to ten years, primarily with cash generated from operations; however, Bluegreen may not be able to generate the cash from operations necessary to complete these commitments and actual costs may exceed the amounts estimated.
Bluegreen believes that its existing cash, anticipated cash generated from operations, anticipated future permitted borrowings under existing or proposed credit facilities and anticipated future sales of notes receivable under the purchase facilities and one or more replacement facilities Bluegreen will seek to put in place will be sufficient to meet its anticipated working capital, capital expenditures and debt service requirements, including the contractual payment of the obligations set forth above, for the foreseeable future, subject to the successful implementation of ongoing strategic initiatives and the ongoing availability of credit. Bluegreen will continue in its efforts to renew, extend, or replace any credit and receivables purchase facilities that have expired or that will expire in the near term. Bluegreen may, in the future, also obtain additional credit facilities and may issue corporate debt or equity securities. Any debt incurred or issued by us may be secured or unsecured, bear interest at fixed or variable rates and may be subject to such terms as the lender may require. In addition, our efforts to renew or replace the credit facilities or receivables purchase facilities which have expired or which are scheduled to expire in the near term may not be successful, and sufficient funds may not be available from operations or under existing, proposed or future revolving credit or other borrowing arrangements or receivables purchase facilities to meet its cash needs, including Bluegreen’s debt service obligations. To the extent Bluegreen is not able to sell notes receivable or borrow under such facilities its ability to satisfy its obligations would be materially adversely affected.
Bluegreen’s credit facilities, indentures, and other outstanding debt instruments, and receivables purchase facilities include what Bluegreen believes to be customary conditions to funding, eligibility requirements for collateral, cross-default and other acceleration provisions, certain financial and other affirmative and negative covenants, including, among others, limits on the incurrence of indebtedness, the repurchase of securities, payment of dividends, investments in joint ventures and other restricted payments, the incurrence of liens, and transactions with affiliates, as well as covenants concerning net worth, fixed charge coverage requirements, debt-to-equity ratios, portfolio performance requirements, cash balances and events of default or termination. In the future, Bluegreen may be

90


Table of Contents

Real Estate
required to seek waivers of such covenants, and Bluegreen may not be successful in obtaining waivers, and such covenants may limit its ability to raise funds, sell receivables, satisfy or refinance our obligations or otherwise adversely affect its operations. Further, certain of Bluegreen’s outstanding debt include covenants which materially limit its ability to pay cash dividends on its common stock or its ability to repurchase shares of Bluegreen’s outstanding common stock. In addition, Bluegreen’s future operating performance and ability to meet its financial obligations will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which will be beyond its control.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2011, Bluegreen did not have any “off-balance sheet” arrangements.

91


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
Financial Services
          Our Financial Services activities of BFC are comprised of the operations of BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries. BankAtlantic Bancorp currently presents its results in two reportable segments and its results of operations are consolidated in BFC Financial Corporation. The only assets available to BFC Financial Corporation from BankAtlantic Bancorp are dividends when and if paid by BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic Bancorp is a separate public company and its management prepared the following discussion regarding BankAtlantic Bancorp which was included in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, references to “the Company”, “the Parent Company” “we”, “us” or “our” in the following discussion under the caption “Financial Services” are references to BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries, and are not references to BFC Financial Corporation, Woodbridge or Bluegreen.
Consolidated Results of Operations
          Income (loss) from continuing operations from each of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s reportable segments was as follows (in thousands):
                         
    For the Three Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     Change  
     
BankAtlantic
  $ 30,967       (39,870 )     70,837  
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company
    (7,566 )     (11,380 )     3,814  
     
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  $ 23,401       (51,250 )     74,651  
     
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to the Same 2010 Period:
          BankAtlantic’s improved performance during the 2011 second quarter compared to the same 2010 quarter primarily was the result of the sale of 19 Tampa branches and related facilities to PNC Bank for a net gain of $38.7 million, a $33.4 million decline in the provision for loan losses and a $7.6 million decline in operating expenses. The above improvements in BankAtlantic’s income (loss) from continuing operations were partially offset by declines in net interest income and service charges on deposit accounts.
          The decrease in the provision for loan losses primarily reflects a slowing in the amount of loans migrating to a delinquency or non-accrual status compared to prior periods as well as lower net charge-offs. During the second quarter of 2011, $33.1 million of loans were transferred to nonaccrual compared to $100.7 million of loans during the same 2010 quarter. Loans delinquent 31 to 89 days declined from $43.4 million as of June 30, 2010 to $27.8 million at June 30, 2011 and net charge-offs declined from $32.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $26.7 during the same 2011 period.
          The decrease in non-interest expenses reflects lower compensation and occupancy expenses associated with the consolidation of back-office facilities, workforce reductions, normal attrition and elimination of expenses associated with BankAtlantic’s Tampa operations as a result of the completion of the Tampa branch sale on June 3, 2011. Additionally, BankAtlantic’s professional fees declined by $3.7 million primarily due to a $3.3 million reimbursement of legal costs from insurers in the 2011 quarter compared to a $1.4 million reimbursement for the 2010 quarter. These lower non-interest expenses were partially offset by an increase in the second quarter of 2011 in impairments of loans held for sale and real estate owned of $7.7 million, and $1.1 million of costs associated with debt redemptions as BankAtlantic repaid certain institutional certificates of deposits and public funds in order to reduce asset balances.
          The lower service charges on deposit accounts primarily reflects lower overdraft fees during the period. The decrease in overdraft fee income reflects the decline in the total number of accounts which incurred overdraft fees and a decrease in the frequency of overdrafts per deposit account. We believe that the decline in the number of accounts incurring overdraft fees reflects efforts to attract customers who maintain deposit accounts with higher balances, regulatory and other changes in our overdraft policies, and changes in customer behavior. BankAtlantic revised its overdraft policies during the first quarter of 2011 instituting a daily limit on the number of overdraft fees a customer will be charged, eliminating an overdraft fee for transactions that result in a small overdrawn balance at the end of the business day, and lowering the amount of overdraft protection provided to a customer. We anticipate that this trend will continue and that our overdraft fee income will be lower in future periods.

92


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
          The lower net interest income resulted primarily from a significant reduction in earning assets and an increasing proportion of investments in low yielding short-term time deposits and securities. BankAtlantic reduced its asset balances in order to improve its regulatory capital ratios.
          The decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company’s loss from continuing operations for the 2011 quarter compared to the same 2010 quarter resulted primarily from a $4.4 million decline in its provision for loan losses, lower compensation expenses and a decline in losses associated with the sale of real estate owned. The above improvements were partially offset by a $1.5 million impairment of an equity security held by BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company. The decrease in the provision for loan losses resulted primarily from a $4.4 million decline in net charge-offs. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company incurred a $0.6 million loss on the sale of real estate owned compared to a $16 thousand gain on the sale of real estate owned during the same 2011 period. The reduction in compensation expense related to the elimination of executive bonuses during 2011. The $1.5 million securities impairment relates to an equity security. There were no impairments of equity securities during the three months ended June 30, 2010.
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to the Same 2010 Period:
                         
    For the Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     Change  
     
BankAtlantic
  $ 14,597       (56,999 )     71,596  
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company
    (14,083 )     (14,772 )     689  
     
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  $ 514       (71,771 )     72,285  
     
          BankAtlantic’s improved performance during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 period resulted primarily from a $37.6 million reduction in the provision for loan losses, a $38.7 million gain on the sale of the Tampa branches and $14.2 million of lower operation expenses. These improvements were partially offset by a $8.8 million decline in net interest income and a $7.3 million reduction in service charges on deposit accounts. The changes in the above items were primarily the result of the items discussed above for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 period as the provision for loan losses declined $3.1 million, compensation expense declined $0.9 million and losses on sales of real estate owned was lower by $0.8 million. The above reductions in the Parent Company’s loss were primarily the result of the items discussed above for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 period partially offset by $3.1 million of real estate owned impairments during the 2011 six month period compared to $0.7 million of impairments during the 2010 period.

93


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
     BankAtlantic Results of Operations
Net interest income
                                                 
    Average Balance Sheet - Yield / Rate Analysis  
    For the Three Months Ended  
    June 30, 2011     June 30, 2010  
    Average     Revenue/     Yield/     Average     Revenue/     Yield/  
(dollars in thousands)   Balance     Expense     Rate     Balance     Expense     Rate  
Total loans
  $ 2,942,196       33,184       4.51     $ 3,591,733       39,839       4.44  
Investments
    1,046,432       4,037       1.54       648,812       3,432       2.12  
                                     
Interest earning assets
    3,988,628       37,221       3.73 %     4,240,545       43,271       4.08 %
 
                                       
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles
    14,125                       15,353                  
Other non-interest earning assets
    270,215                       304,066                  
                                     
Total Assets
  $ 4,272,968                     $ 4,559,964                  
 
                                           
Deposits:
                                               
Savings
  $ 478,628       258       0.22 %   $ 445,686       271       0.24 %
NOW
    1,412,720       1,295       0.37       1,525,475       1,786       0.47  
Money market
    408,653       526       0.52       386,712       630       0.65  
Certificates of deposit
    606,291       1,896       1.25       805,656       3,334       1.66  
                                     
Total interest bearing deposits
    2,906,292       3,975       0.55       3,163,529       6,021       0.76  
 
                                   
Short-term borrowed funds
    15,289       5       0.13       33,665       10       0.12  
Advances from FHLB
    42,747       38       0.36       1,264       1       0.32  
Long-term debt
    22,000       226       4.12       22,000       231       4.21  
                                     
Total interest bearing liabilities
    2,986,328       4,244       0.57       3,220,458       6,263       0.78  
 
                                   
Demand deposits
    952,444                       916,105                  
Non-interest bearing other liabilities
    48,698                       54,929                  
                                     
Total liabilities
    3,987,470                       4,191,492                  
Stockholder’s equity
    285,498                       368,472                  
 
                                           
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity
  $ 4,272,968                     $ 4,559,964                  
 
                                           
Net interest income/
                                               
Net interest spread
          $ 32,977       3.16 %             37,008       3.30 %
 
                                       
Margin
                                               
Interest income/interest earning assets
                    3.73 %                     4.08 %
Interest expense/interest earning assets
                    0.43                       0.59  
                                     
Net interest margin
                    3.30 %                     3.49 %
 
                                           
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to the Same 2010 Period:
          The decrease in net interest income resulted primarily from a reduction in earning assets, an increase in cash balances invested in low yielding short-term investments and a reduction in the net interest margin.
          The average balance of earning assets declined by $251.9 million. The decline in average earning assets reflects a significant reduction in the origination and purchase of loans, lower agency securities balances as a result of repayments, and reduced purchases of tax certificates. The reductions in average earning assets were partially offset by increased investments in short-term interest bearing securities and higher interest bearing balances at the Federal Reserve Bank. These higher short-term asset and cash balances were maintained in order to fund the Tampa branch sale, enhance liquidity and improve regulatory risk-based capital ratios. BankAtlantic also experienced significant residential loan repayments due to normal loan amortization as well as a substantial amount of loan refinancing associated with low residential mortgage interest rates during 2010 and the first half of 2011. Residential loan average balances declined from $1.43 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $1.1 billion during the same 2011 quarter. Also, BankAtlantic ceased originating commercial real estate loans contributing to average commercial real estate balances declining from $1.05 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $821 million for the same 2011 period. BankAtlantic also slowed the origination of consumer loans and average balances of these loans declined from $670 million during the 2010 quarter to $605 million during the same 2011 quarter.
          The increase in average investment balances primarily reflects an increase of $297.2 million in interest bearing deposits held at the Federal Reserve Bank and a $148.3 million increase in average short-term interest bearing securities. BankAtlantic used a portion of the cash proceeds from loan repayments to purchase short-term investments, including time deposits at other banks, agency securities and tax exempt securities, and to maintain higher interest earning cash balances at the Federal Reserve Bank. The average balances at the Federal Reserve

94


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
Bank were $551.8 million for the 2011 quarter compared to $254.6 million for the 2010 quarter. These short-term securities and balances at the Federal Reserve Bank enhanced BankAtlantic’s liquidity; however, the average yield on these investments is lower than the yields on loans and other investments.
          The net interest margin declined due to a change in our interest earning asset mix from higher yielding loans and mortgage-backed securities to lower yielding short-term investments and interest earning cash balances at the Federal Reserve Bank. The decline in interest earning asset yields was partially offset by a decline in interest bearing liability interest rates.
          The improvement in interest bearing liability interest rates primarily resulted from a decline in the average interest rates on deposits. The lower average rates on deposits reflect the low interest rate environment and a significant reduction in certificate of deposit balances. In June 2011, BankAtlantic prepaid $110 million of institution certificates of deposit and public funds. Certificates of deposit accounts generally bear higher rates of interest than other deposit accounts.
                                                 
    Average Balance Sheet - Yield / Rate Analysis  
    For the Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2011     June 30, 2010  
    Average     Revenue/     Yield/     Average     Revenue/     Yield/  
(dollars in thousands)   Balance     Expense     Rate     Balance     Expense     Rate  
Total loans
  $ 3,023,911       68,044       4.50     $ 3,671,378       81,417       4.44  
Investments
    1,081,964       8,597       1.59       626,281       9,569       3.04  
                                     
Total interest earning assets
    4,105,875       76,641       3.73 %     4,297,659       90,986       4.23 %
 
                                       
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles
    14,267                       15,501                  
Other non-interest earning assets
    270,712                       308,594                  
                                     
Total Assets
  $ 4,390,854                     $ 4,621,754                  
 
                                           
Deposits:
                                               
Savings
  $ 473,678       530       0.23 %   $ 435,517       604       0.28 %
NOW
    1,465,619       2,807       0.39       1,496,450       4,004       0.54  
Money market
    398,958       968       0.49       373,664       1,259       0.68  
Certificates of deposit
    632,028       4,036       1.29       850,615       7,211       1.71  
                                     
Total interest bearing deposits
    2,970,283       8,341       0.57       3,156,246       13,078       0.84  
 
                                   
Short-term borrowed funds
    22,645       15       0.13       36,505       23       0.13  
Advances from FHLB
    88,536       153       0.35       86,663       959       2.23  
Long-term debt
    22,000       451       4.13       22,252       459       4.16  
                                     
Total interest bearing liabilities
    3,103,464       8,960       0.58       3,301,666       14,519       0.89  
 
                                   
Demand deposits
    948,717                       890,391                  
Non-interest bearing other liabilities
    50,784                       54,626                  
                                     
Total liabilities
    4,102,965                       4,246,683                  
Stockholder’s equity
    287,889                       375,071                  
                                     
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity
  $ 4,390,854                     $ 4,621,754                  
 
                                           
Net interest income/
                                               
Net interest spread
          $ 67,681       3.15 %             76,467       3.35 %
 
                                       
Margin
                                               
Interest income/interest earning assets
                    3.73 %                     4.23 %
Interest expense/interest earning assets
                    0.44                       0.68  
                                     
Net interest margin
                    3.29 %                     3.55 %
 
                                           
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to the Same 2010 Period:
          The decrease in net interest income was primarily the result of the items discussed above for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 period. The lower net interest income reflects a significant decline in average earning assets and an increase in cash balances invested in low yielding investments partially offset by a decline in interest rates on interest-bearing liabilities. The decline in interest rates on interest-bearing liabilities reflects lower deposit interest rates for the 2011 period compared to the 2010 period as well as lower FHLB advance borrowing interest rates. The lower FHLB advance interest rates resulted from BankAtlantic replacing its intermediate term FHLB advances with short-term advances which typically have lower interest rates.

95


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
Asset Quality
          The activity in BankAtlantic’s allowance for loan losses was as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    For The Three Months     For The Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 154,237       169,548       161,309       173,588  
 
                       
Charge-offs
                               
Residential
    (5,767 )     (5,233 )     (13,778 )     (9,414 )
Commercial real estate
    (13,546 )     (14,146 )     (24,823 )     (35,478 )
Commercial non-mortgage
    (124 )           (588 )      
Consumer
    (6,379 )     (11,822 )     (14,193 )     (22,593 )
Small business
    (2,010 )     (2,225 )     (4,621 )     (3,062 )
 
                       
Total Charge-offs
    (27,826 )     (33,426 )     (58,003 )     (70,547 )
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
    1,262       879       3,616       1,926  
 
                       
Net charge-offs
    (26,564 )     (32,547 )     (54,387 )     (68,621 )
Transfer to held for sale
    (225 )           (7,306 )      
Provision for loan losses
    10,195       43,634       38,027       75,668  
 
                       
Balance, end of period
  $ 137,643       180,635       137,643       180,635  
 
                       
          Residential loan charge-offs increased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 periods. The higher residential charge-offs reflect a decline in property values. We believe the property value declines resulted primarily from a lack of available residential loan financing, appraisals not supporting negotiated sales prices and higher residential property inventory resulting from foreclosures nationally.
          Commercial real estate loan charge-offs declined during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to lower charge-offs in BankAtlantic’s commercial residential loan portfolio. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, BankAtlantic recognized $12.0 million of charge-offs related to commercial other loans, $1.2 million related to commercial residential loans and $0.2 million related to commercial owner occupied loans. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, BankAtlantic recognized $12.6 million of charge-offs related to commercial other loans, $5.1 million related to commercial residential loans, $0.2 million related to owner occupied loans. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, BankAtlantic recognized $9.6 million of charge-offs related to commercial residential loans. The remaining $4.9 million of commercial real estate loan charge-offs were associated primarily with commercial other loans. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, BankAtlantic recognized an additional $16.9 million of charge-offs related to commercial residential loans. Historically, the majority of BankAtlantic’s charge-off were related to commercial residential loans and the balances in the commercial residential portfolio have declined from $266.2 million at December 31, 2009 to $169.3 million at June 30, 2010 to $104.6 million at June 30, 2011.
          We believe that the decline in consumer loan charge-offs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 periods reflects a stabilization of Florida market trends. Additionally, during 2008 BankAtlantic reduced the origination of and utilized more restrictive underwriting criteria for home equity loans. As a consequence, loan delinquencies and charge-offs have declined as loan balances of loans originated prior to 2008 have declined.
          Included in small business loan charge-offs during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was a $1.0 million charge-off of a small business mortgage loan. The remaining small business charge-offs were primarily related to businesses associated with the real estate industry.
          The decrease in the provision for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 periods resulted primarily from lower loan delinquencies, a decline in loans migrating to non-accrual status and lower charge-offs.
          During the three months ended March 31, 2011, BankAtlantic transferred $25.1 million of residential and $2.5 million of commercial real estate non-accrual loans to loans held for sale with a view toward selling the loans in the foreseeable future. In connection with that transfer, BankAtlantic recorded the loans at the lower of cost or

96


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
fair value resulting in a $7.1 million reduction in the allowance for loan losses. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, BankAtlantic transferred $28.4 million of commercial loans to loans held for sale.
          While we believe we have seen some positive trends in the economy both in Florida and nationally that indicate that credit losses may decline in future periods, if the housing and real estate industries do not improve or if general economic conditions do not continue to improve in Florida and nationwide, the credit quality of our loan portfolio may deteriorate and additional provisions for loan losses will be required. Additionally, we have a significant amount of variable interest rate loans in our portfolio and a substantial increase in interest rates in the future would increase the interest payments required on these loans which could have an adverse effect on the credit quality of those loans.
          At the indicated dates, BankAtlantic’s non-performing assets, loans contractually past due 90 days or more and still accruing, performing impaired loans and troubled debt restructured loans were as follows (in thousands):
                 
    As of  
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS                
Tax certificates
  $ 2,756       3,636  
Residential (1)
    81,362       86,538  
Commercial real estate (2)
    190,684       243,299  
Commercial non-mortgage
    17,098       16,123  
Small business
    11,990       10,879  
Consumer
    14,614       14,120  
 
           
Total non-accrual assets (3)
    318,504       374,595  
 
           
REPOSSESSED ASSETS:
               
Residential real estate
    14,163       16,418  
Commercial real estate
    53,547       44,136  
Small business real estate
    3,269       3,693  
Consumer real estate
    81       81  
 
           
Total repossessed assets
    71,060       64,328  
 
           
Total non-performing assets
  $ 389,564       438,923  
 
           
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of:
               
Total assets
    10.17       9.82  
 
           
Loans, tax certificates and real estate owned
    13.04       13.08  
 
           
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 3,831,471       4,469,168  
 
           
TOTAL LOANS, TAX CERTIFICATES AND NET REAL ESTATE OWNED
  $ 2,987,738       3,355,711  
 
           
Allowance for loan losses
  $ 137,643       161,309  
 
           
Tax certificates
  $ 66,211       89,789  
 
           
Allowance for tax certificate losses
  $ 8,526       8,811  
 
           
OTHER ACCRUING IMPAIRED LOANS
               
Contractually past due 90 days or more (4)
  $        
Performing impaired loans (5)
          11,880  
Troubled debt restructured loans
    145,952       96,006  
 
           
TOTAL OTHER ACCRUING IMPAIRED LOANS
  $ 145,952       107,886  
 
           
 
(1)   Includes $34.5 million and $38.9 million of interest-only residential loans as of June 30, 2011and December 31, 2010, respectively.
 
(2)   Excluded from the above table as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $9.4 million and $14.5 million, respectively, of commercial residential loans that were transferred to a work-out subsidiary of the Parent Company in March 2008.
 
(3)   Includes $125.6 million and $143.8 million of troubled debt restructured loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
 
(4)   BankAtlantic believes that it will ultimately collect the principal and interest associated with these loans; however, the timing of the payments may not be in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
 
(5)   These loans are performing in accordance with their respective modified terms.
     The decline in non-performing assets at June 30, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010 reflects lower residential and commercial real estate non-accrual loans partially offset by higher commercial real estate owned balances.
     The decline in commercial real estate non-accrual loans primarily resulted from a decline in loans

97


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
migrating to a non-accrual status. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, $29.5 million of loans migrated to a non-accrual status while $105.1 million of loans migrated to non-accrual during the same 2010 period. Additionally, two non-accrual loans with an aggregate book value of $11.7 million were sold and $18.0 million of commercial real estate non-accrual loans were transferred to real estate owned during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
          The decline in residential non-accrual loans was primarily the result of charge-offs and fair value adjustments associated with non-accrual residential loans transferred to loans held for sale. Also contributing to lower non-accrual residential loans was a decline in delinquencies. Residential loans past due 30 to 90 days declined from $23.1 million at December 31, 2010 to $16.1 million at June 30, 2011. However, residential loan credit quality is dependent on economic conditions, specifically unemployment and property values. If economic conditions deteriorate, we would anticipate higher residential non-accrual loan balances and real estate owned in subsequent periods.
          The higher balance of repossessed assets at June 30, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010 resulted primarily from foreclosures of commercial real estate loans. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, BankAtlantic transferred $25.0 million of loans to real estate owned and sold $10.1 million of real estate owned properties. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, BankAtlantic transferred $21.9 million of loans to real estate owned and sold $12.4 million of real estate owned properties. As non-accrual loans migrate into repossessed assets in the future, we expect repossessed assets as well as sales of real estate owned to increase.
          BankAtlantic’s accruing troubled debt restructured loans at June 30, 2011 increased by 52% compared to accruing troubled debt restructured loans at December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the restructuring of three commercial real estate loan relationships aggregating $40.0 million and one commercial non-mortgage relationship aggregating $18.2 million. In response to current market conditions, BankAtlantic generally decides, on a case-by-case basis, whether to modify loans for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties and has modified the terms of certain commercial, small business, residential and consumer home equity loans. Generally, the concessions made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties have included a variety of modifications, including among others, the reduction of contractual interest rates, and forgiveness of loan principal upon satisfactory performance under the modified terms, conversion of amortizing loans to interest only payments or the deferral of some interest payments until the maturity date of the loan. Loans that are not delinquent at the date of modification are generally not placed on non-accrual. Modified non-accrual loans are generally not returned to an accruing status and BankAtlantic does not reset days past due on delinquent modified loans until the borrower demonstrates a sustained period of performance under the modified terms, which is generally performance over a six month period.
          BankAtlantic’s troubled debt restructured loans by loan type were as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    As of June 30, 2011     As of December 31, 2010  
    Non-accrual     Accruing     Non-accrual     Accruing  
Commercial
  $ 111,944       121,928       130,783       70,990  
Small business
    3,312       8,030       2,990       9,401  
Consumer
    1,067       13,497       3,070       12,638  
Residential
    9,305       2,497       6,917       2,977  
 
                       
Total
  $ 125,628       145,952       143,760       96,006  
 
                       

98


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
     BankAtlantic’s commercial loan portfolio includes large loan balance lending relationships. Seven relationships accounted for 53.6% of our $208.0 million of non-accrual commercial loans as of June 30, 2011. The following table outlines general information about these seven relationships as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
                                                                 
    Unpaid                                            
    Principal     Recorded     Specific     Date loan     Date Placed     Default     Loan     Date of Last  
Relationships   Balance     Investment(5)     Reserves     Originated     on Nonaccrual     Date (4)     Class     Full Appraisal  
 
Residential Land Developers
                                                               
Relationship No. 1 (1)
  $ 39,298       12,143       318       Q3-2004       Q4-2008       Q4-2008     Land     Q4-2010  
                                             
Commercial Land Developers
                                                               
Relationship No. 2
    12,000       11,944       7,259       Q2-2005       Q4-2010       (3 )   Land     Q1-2011  
Relationship No. 3
    27,522       26,210       10,481       Q1-1995       Q4-2009       Q4-2009     Land     Q1-2011  
Relationship No. 4
    10,341       10,341       4,480       Q1-2005       Q4-2010       (3 )   Land     Q4-2010  
Relationship No. 5 (2)
    30,068       9,139             Q4-2006       Q4-2008       Q4-2008     Land     Q4-2010  
                                             
Total
  $ 79,931       57,634       22,220                                          
                                             
Commercial Non-Residential Developers
                                                               
Relationship No. 6
  $ 25,287       25,158       8,913       Q3-2006       Q2-2010       (3 )   Other     Q2-2011  
Relationship No. 7
    16,440       16,331       4,826       Q1-2007       Q3-2010       (3 )   Other     Q2-2011  
                                             
Total
  $ 41,727       41,489       13,739                                          
                                             
Total of Large Relationships
  $ 160,956       111,266       36,277                                          
                                             
 
(1)   During 2009, 2010 and 2011, BankAtlantic recognized partial charge-offs on relationship No. 1 aggregating $24.9 million.
 
(2)   During 2009 and 2011, BankAtlantic recognized partial charge-offs on relationship No. 5 of $20.3 million.
 
(3)   The loan is currently not in default.
 
(4)   The default date is defined as the date of the initial missed payment prior to default.
 
(5)   Recorded investment is the “Unpaid Principal Balance” less charge-offs.
          The following table presents our purchased residential loans by year of origination segregated by amortizing and interest only loans at June 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
                                                                 
    Amortizing Purchased Residential Loans  
Year of   Unpaid     Recorded     LTV at     Current     FICO Scores     Current     Amount     Debt Ratios  
Origination   Principal     Investment     Origination     LTV (1)     at Origination     FICO Scores (2)     Delinquent     at Origination (3)  
     
2007
  $ 34,620       32,433       66.04 %     132.00 %     736       735       5,881       33.23 %
2006
    40,529       38,617       72.43 %     114.44 %     727       705       6,232       37.67 %
2005
    63,277       58,469       73.87 %     114.70 %     725       702       11,200       35.38 %
2004
    257,732       253,908       69.01 %     82.06 %     732       722       23,916       34.75 %
Prior to 2004
    121,726       121,170       68.56 %     57.21 %     730       724       5,894       34.34 %
     
                                                                 
    Interest Only Purchased Residential Loans  
Year of   Unpaid     Recorded     LTV at     Current     FICO Scores     Current     Amount     Debt Ratios  
Origination   Principal     Investment     Origination     LTV (1)     at Origination     FICO Scores (2)     Delinquent     at Origination (3)  
     
2007
  $ 67,929       63,200       73.12 %     123.66 %     749       743       13,044       34.53 %
2006
    154,229       145,098       73.78 %     119.05 %     739       736       27,929       35.00 %
2005
    133,211       131,305       70.98 %     109.90 %     739       749       7,460       34.85 %
2004
    62,375       60,646       70.83 %     96.00 %     743       711       6,673       32.30 %
Prior to 2004
    54,655       54,272       58.59 %     69.97 %     740       727       2,588       31.91 %
     
     The following table presents our purchased residential loans by geographic area segregated by amortizing and interest-only loans at June 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
                                                                 
    Amortizing Purchased Residential Loans  
    Unpaid     Recorded     LTV at     Current     FICO Scores     Current     Amount     Debt Ratios  
State   Principal     Investment     Origination     LTV (1)     at Origination     FICO Scores (2)     Delinquent     at Origination (3)  
     
Arizona
  $ 12,738       12,457       69.65 %     90.69 %     745       742       1,301       31.98 %
California
    132,439       127,736       69.59 %     86.82 %     734       723       15,357       35.42 %
Florida
    77,448       74,272       69.22 %     100.39 %     720       702       12,435       35.02 %
Nevada
    8,203       8,054       73.21 %     142.99 %     740       737       568       36.02 %
All other States
    313,781       308,800       69.45 %     80.55 %     731       726       23,679       34.06 %
     

99


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
                                                                 
    Interest Only Purchased Residential Loans  
    Unpaid     Recorded     LTV at     Current     FICO Scores     Current     Amount     Debt Ratios  
State   Principal     Investment     Origination     LTV (1)     at Origination     FICO Scores (2)     Delinquent     at Origination (3)  
     
Arizona
  $ 15,074       14,037       71.54 %     133.76 %     758       755       2,939       31.73 %
California
    137,299       132,787       70.80 %     105.46 %     742       735       18,071       33.85 %
Florida
    31,006       27,938       68.93 %     126.64 %     746       722       8,677       31.20 %
Nevada
    6,675       4,580       73.36 %     165.99 %     735       631       4,301       33.85 %
All other States
    282,345       275,178       70.82 %     106.85 %     739       743       23,705       37.76 %
     
 
(1)   Current loan-to-values (“LTV”) for the majority of the portfolio were obtained as of the second quarter of 2011 from automated valuation models.
 
(2)   Current FICO scores based on borrowers for which FICO scores were available as of the second quarter of 2011.
 
(3)   Debt ratio is defined as the portion of the borrower’s income that goes towards debt service.
          The table below presents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) by various loan classifications, the percent of allowance to each loan category (“ALL to gross loans percent”) and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans (“Loans to gross loans percent”). The allowance shown in the table should not be interpreted as an indication that charge-offs in future periods will occur in these amounts or percentages or that the allowance accurately reflects future charge-off amounts or trends (dollars in thousands):
                                                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
            ALL     Loans             ALL     Loans  
            to gross     by             to gross     by  
    ALL     loans     Category     ALL     loans     category  
    by     in each     to gross     by     in each     to gross  
    category     category     loans     category     category     loans  
         
Commercial non-mortgage
  $ 11,017       8.89 %     4.36 %   $ 10,786       8.05 %     4.14 %
Commercial real estate
    68,054       8.57       27.93       83,029       8.70       29.46  
Small business
    9,853       3.37       10.29       11,514       3.80       9.35  
Residential real estate
    23,721       2.28       36.56       23,937       1.96       37.80  
Consumer
    24,998       4.21       20.86       32,043       5.14       19.25  
 
                                       
Total allowance for loan losses
  $ 137,643       4.84 %     100.00 %   $ 161,309       4.98 %     100.00 %
 
                                       
          Included in the allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were specific reserves by loan type as follows (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Commercial non-mortgage
  $ 9,618       9,020  
Commercial real estate
    47,638       62,986  
Small business
    1,595       2,936  
Consumer
    1,671       1,791  
Residential
    4,555       12,034  
 
           
Total
  $ 65,077       88,767  
 
           
          The decrease in the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010 resulted primarily from a decline in specific valuation allowances on commercial real estate and residential loans. The commercial real estate specific valuation allowance decline reflects a slowdown of loans migrating to an impaired classification. The residential loan specific valuation allowance decline reflects the reduction in allowances associated with $25.1 million of non-performing loans transferring to loans held for sale as well as reductions in allowances associated with foreclosed residential loan activity. The general reserve for residential loans increased $7.2 million during the 2011 quarter reflecting increased charge-offs and declining collateral values. Consumer loan general reserves were reduced by $6.9 million due primarily to improvement in delinquency and charge-off trends as well as declining balances of loans originated prior to 2008.

100


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantic’s Non-Interest Income
                                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     Change     2011     2010     Change  
         
Service charges on deposits
  $ 11,226       15,502       (4,276 )     23,258       30,550       (7,292 )
Other service charges and fees
    6,886       7,739       (853 )     14,077       15,117       (1,040 )
Securities activities, net
          309       (309 )     (24 )     3,441       (3,465 )
Gain on sale of Tampa branches
    38,656             38,656       38,656             38,656  
Other
    3,306       2,721       585       7,020       5,420       1,600  
         
Non-interest income
  $ 60,074       26,271       33,803       82,987       54,528       28,459  
         
          The lower revenues from service charges on deposits during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 periods resulted primarily from lower overdraft fee income. This decrease in overdraft fee income reflects a decline in the total number of accounts which incurred overdraft fees and a decrease in the frequency of overdrafts per deposit account. We believe that the decline in the number of accounts incurring overdraft fees reflected our efforts to attract customers who maintain deposit accounts with higher balances, regulatory and other changes in overdraft policies and changes in customer behavior. The Federal Reserve adopted new overdraft rules (effective July 1, 2010 for new customers and August 15, 2010 for existing customers), which among other requirements, prohibit banks from automatically enrolling customers in overdraft protection programs for point-of-sale and ATM transactions. Additionally, Congress has established a consumer protection agency which may further limit the assessment of overdraft fees. In response to the changing industry practices and regulations during the fourth quarter of 2010, BankAtlantic began converting certain deposit products to fee-based accounts that encourage higher checking account balances or higher account activity in order to eliminate or reduce fees. Additionally, during the first quarter of 2011, BankAtlantic revised its overdraft policies instituting a daily limit on the number of overdraft fees a customer will be charged, eliminating an overdraft fee for transactions that result in a small overdrawn balance at the end of the business day, and lowering the amount of overdraft protection provided to a customer. We anticipate that this trend will continue and that our overdraft fee income will be lower in future periods, partially offset by increased fees from new deposit products and expanded use of the bank’s fee services by deposit customers.
          The decrease in other service charges and fees during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 periods resulted primarily from lower ATM interchange and surcharge income primarily related to a lower volume of transactions. Additionally, losses on check card transactions associated with check card fraud increased by $0.2 million during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 periods.
          In June 2011, BankAtlantic sold 19 branches and 2 related facilities in the Tampa area and the associated deposits to an unrelated financial institution and recognized a $38.7 million gain.
          During the three months ended June 30, 2010, BankAtlantic entered into a foreign currency derivative contract as an economic hedge of foreign currency in cruise ship ATMs and recognized a $0.3 million gain on the contract. BankAtlantic recognized a $24,000 loss in connection with these derivative contracts during the six months ended June 30, 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, BankAtlantic sold $47.1 million of agency securities for a $3.1 million gain. The net proceeds of $43.8 million from the sales were used to pay down FHLB advance borrowings. The increase in other non-interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 period was primarily the result of $140,000 of foreign currency exchange gains associated with foreign currency held in cruise ship ATMs during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to foreign currency exchange losses of $0.7 million during the same 2010 period. Foreign currency exchange gains were $0.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to a $0.7 million loss during the same 2010 period.
          Other non-interest income consisted of the following (in thousands):
                                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     Change     2011     2010     Change  
         
Broker commissions
  $ 798       1,074       (276 )     1,908       1,873       35  
Safe deposit box rental
    289       326       (37 )     567       630       (63 )
Income from leases
    255       273       (18 )     525       531       (6 )
Fee income
    808       562       246       1,414       1,085       329  
Foreign exchange gains (losses)
    140       (661 )     801       560       (661 )     1,221  
Other
    1,016       1,147       (131 )     2,046       1,962       84  
         
Total other income
  $ 3,306       2,721       585       7,020       5,420       1,600  
         

101


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantic’s Non-Interest Expense
                                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
(in thousands)   2011     2010     Change     2011     2010     Change  
         
Employee compensation and benefits
  $ 19,218       24,254       (5,036 )     37,981       48,628       (10,647 )
Occupancy and equipment
    11,488       13,745       (2,257 )     24,073       27,326       (3,253 )
Advertising and promotion
    1,435       2,121       (686 )     3,104       4,055       (951 )
Check losses
    663       521       142       962       953       9  
Professional fees
    530       4,220       (3,690 )     3,511       6,785       (3,274 )
Supplies and postage
    879       895       (16 )     1,749       1,860       (111 )
Telecommunication
    444       655       (211 )     1,016       1,184       (168 )
Provision for tax certificates
    1,021       2,134       (1,113 )     1,800       2,867       (1,067 )
Cost associated with debt redemption
    1,115       53       1,062       1,125       60       1,065  
Impairment on loans held for sale
    1,506             1,506       1,707             1,707  
Employee termination (reversals) costs
    (38 )           (38 )     (193 )           (193 )
Lease termination (reversals) costs
    (594 )     216       (810 )     (1,442 )     216       (1,658 )
Impairment of real estate held for sale
    353       1,510       (1,157 )     353       1,510       (1,157 )
Impairment of real estate owned
    6,151       521       5,630       6,554       664       5,890  
FDIC deposit insurance assessment
    2,181       2,430       (249 )     5,486       4,788       698  
(Gains) losses on sale of real estate
    (362 )     880       (1,242 )     (640 )     776       (1,416 )
Amortization of intangible assets
    295       309       (14 )     604       631       (27 )
Other
    5,604       5,051       553       10,293       9,933       360  
         
Total non-interest expense
  $ 51,889       59,515       (7,626 )     98,043       112,236       (14,193 )
         
          The decline in employee compensation and benefits during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 period resulted primarily from workforce reductions, normal attrition and the transfer of employees to the purchaser of the Tampa branches in June 2011. The number of full-time equivalent employees declined from 1,532 as of December 31, 2009 to 1,045 as of June 30, 2011 (a 32% reduction in the workforce) with the Tampa branch sale affecting approximately 130 employees. Additionally, employee and executive bonuses were $0.5 million and $1.7 million lower during the 2011 three and six months periods compared to the same 2010 periods, respectively. The decline in the workforce also resulted in reduced benefit costs compared to 2010, relating primarily to health insurance, payroll taxes and share-based compensation.
          The decline in occupancy and equipment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 periods resulted primarily from $1.9 million and $2.7 million of lower rent expense, building maintenance and real estate taxes related to the consolidation of back-office facilities, the sale of the Tampa branches and the termination of leases executed for branch expansion during prior periods.
          The decrease in advertising and business promotion expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 periods related primarily to BankAtlantic focusing its marketing efforts more on customer relationships and less on advertising and media and direct mail promotions.
          The increase in check losses for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 period resulted from a $0.3 million increase in customer check fraud. This increase was partially offset by a decline in write-offs associated with overdrafts related primarily to revisions to our overdraft policies limiting the number of overdrafts per day and the dollar amount of overdrafts.
          The decline in professional fees during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 period resulted primarily from $3.3 million of insurance reimbursements in connection with class action securities litigation compared to $1.4 million of reimbursements during the same 2010 period. The remaining decrease in professional fees reflects lower legal costs associated with class action securities litigation as the trial was completed during the fourth quarter of 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, insurance reimbursement in connection with the class action securities litigation was $3.3 million compared to $3.1 million during the same 2010 period.
          The reduction in telecommunication costs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 periods primarily resulted from higher call center volume associated with the implementation of a new on-line banking product during the three months ended June 30, 2010.

102


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
          The decrease in the provision for tax certificate losses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 reflects lower charge-offs and increases in tax certificate reserves associated with declining portfolio balances. The majority of the provision for tax certificates relates to out-of-state certificates. We have significantly reduced the acquisition of out-of-state tax certificates and have concentrated the majority of our tax certificate acquisitions in Florida.
          The costs associated with debt redemptions during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 reflect prepayment penalties on the early repayment of $85 million of institutional time deposits and $25 million of public fund time deposits. Included in costs associated with debt redemptions during the six months ended June 30, 2011 were prepayment penalties for the early repayment of $40.0 million of FHLB advance obligations.
          The impairment of loans held for sale represents lower of cost or market adjustments on loans classified as held for sale. The impairment resulted primarily from lower property values obtained from updated valuations of the underlying loan collateral. Residential loans held for sale were impaired by $1.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011. The remaining loan impairments were related to commercial real estate loans.
          The recovery of employee termination (reversals) costs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 reflects the forfeiture of termination benefits upon the re-hiring of terminated employees.
          Lease termination (reversals) costs represent lease contracts, net of deferred rent reversals, originally executed for branch expansion. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, BankAtlantic terminated one lease and four leases and recognized a recovery of $0.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively. BankAtlantic is attempting to sublease or terminate lease contracts executed in connection with its branch expansion in prior periods and could recognize losses associated with these operating leases in subsequent periods as these leases are measured at fair value.
          Impairments on real estate held for sale during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 represents updated valuations on properties acquired for store expansion.
          Impairment of real estate owned during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 reflects updated valuations on properties. The majority of the impairment ($5.2 million) relates to one property during the three months ended June 30, 2011. The property impairment resulted from an updated valuation.
          The increase in other non-interest expense was primarily the result of higher foreclosure costs. Foreclosure costs increased by $0.5 million and $0.4 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 periods.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company Results of Operations
                                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
(in thousands)   2011     2010     Change     2011     2010     Change  
         
Net interest (expense)
  $ (3,794 )     (3,579 )     (215 )     (7,489 )     (7,064 )     (425 )
Provision for loan losses
    (515 )     (4,919 )     4,404       (495 )     (3,640 )     3,145  
         
Net interest (expense) after provision for loan losses
    (4,309 )     (8,498 )     4,189       (7,984 )     (10,704 )     2,720  
Non-interest income (expense)
    (751 )     511       (1,262 )     (161 )     969       (1,130 )
Non-interest expense
    2,506       3,393       (887 )     5,938       5,037       901  
         
Parent company (loss)
  $ (7,566 )     (11,380 )     3,814       (14,083 )     (14,772 )     689  
         
          Net interest expense increased during the second quarter and first six months of 2011 compared to the same 2010 periods as a result of higher average debenture balances and average interest rates. The average balances on junior subordinated debentures increased from $312 million and $311 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 to $327 million and $325 million during the same 2011 periods. The increase in average debenture balances resulted from the deferral of interest which began in March 2009. Average rates on junior subordinated debentures increased from 4.69% and 4.65% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 to 4.73% and 4.74% during the same 2011 periods. Also included in net interest expense during the three and six months ended

103


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
June 30, 2011 was $57,000 and $106,000, respectively, of interest income on two performing loans as well as $0 and $37,000, respectively, of investment dividend income associated with an equity security. Interest income on performing loans during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $59,000 and $114,000 and dividend income from the equity security was $22,000 and $45,000, respectively. The equity security ceased paying dividends during the second quarter of 2011.
          Non-interest income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 reflects a $1.5 million impairment of an equity security. There were no investment securities impairments during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. Equity earnings from the Parent Company’s investment in statutory business trusts that issue trust preferred securities were $0.4 million and $0.8 million, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $0.2 million and $0.4 million during the same 2010 periods, respectively. Also included in non-interest income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $0.3 million and $0.6 million of fees for executive services provided to BankAtlantic compared to $0.2 million and $0.5 million during the same periods during 2010, respectively.
          The decrease in non-interest expense during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 period reflects a $0.6 million loss on the sale of real estate owned during the 2010 quarter compared to a $16,000 gain on the sale of real estate owned during the same 2011 period. Also, employee compensation decreased by $0.4 million associated with the elimination of executive bonuses during 2011. Non-interest expense during the three months ended June 30, 2011 includes a $0.4 million lower of cost or market adjustment (“LOCOM”) associated with loans held for sale and $0.4 million of real estate owned impairments compared to no adjustments for loans held for sale and $0.7 million of real estate owned write-downs during the same 2010 periods. The lower of cost or market adjustments and real estate owned impairments resulted from updated property valuations.
          The increase in non-interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 period resulted primarily from $3.1 million of real estate owned impairments during 2011 compared to $0.7 million of impairments during 2010. The increase in non-interest expense was partially offset by lower compensation expense and lower losses on the sale of real estate owned.
          In March 2008, BankAtlantic transferred non-performing loans to a work-out subsidiary of the Parent Company. The composition of these loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was as follows (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
     
Nonaccrual loans:
               
Commercial real estate:
               
Residential
  $ 4,976       8,985  
Land
    4,384       5,523  
     
Total non-accrual loans
    9,360       14,508  
Allowance for loan losses
          (830 )
     
Non-accrual loans, net
    9,360       13,678  
Performing other commercial loans
    2,622       2,811  
     
Loans receivable, net
  $ 11,982       16,489  
     
Real estate owned
  $ 8,644       10,160  
     
          During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Parent Company foreclosed on a $1.5 million commercial residential loan, charged-off $1.3 of loans, recognized $0.4 million lower of cost or market adjustments on loans held for sale, and sold a $1.7 million loan for a $99,000 loss. The work-out subsidiary also received $0.2 million of loan principal repayments during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

104


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
     The Parent Company’s non-accrual loans include large loan balance lending relationships. Two relationships account for 82.1% of the $9.4 million of non-accrual loans held by the Parent Company at June 30, 2011. The following table outlines general information about these relationships as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
                                                                 
    Unpaid                                            
    Principal     Recorded     Specific     Date loan     Date Placed     Default     Collateral     Date of Last  
Relationships   Balance     Investment (3)     Reserves     Originated     on Nonaccrual     Date     Type     Full Appraisal  
 
Commercial land
                                                               
Relationship No. 1 (1)
  $ 5,604       4,383             Q4-2005       Q4-2007       Q4-2007     Land     Q4-2010  
                                             
Residential Land Developers
                                                               
Relationship No. 2 (2)
    20,000       3,297             Q1-2005       Q4-2007       Q1-2008     Residential     Q3-2010  
                                             
Total
  $ 25,604       7,680                                                
                                             
 
(1)   During 2011, the Company recognized partial charge-offs on relationship No. 1 aggregating $1.2 million.
 
(2)   During 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, the Company recognized partial charge-offs and LOCOM adjustments on relationship No. 2 aggregating $16.4 million.
 
(3)   Recorded investment is the “Unpaid Principal Balance” less charge-offs and deferred fees.
          The loans that comprise the above relationships are all collateral dependent. As such, we established specific reserves, recognized partial charge-offs or calculated LOCOM adjustments on these loans based on the fair value of the underlying collateral less costs to sell. The fair value of the collateral was determined using third party appraisals for all relationships. Management performs quarterly impairment analyses on these credit relationships subsequent to the date of the appraisal and may reduce appraised values if market conditions significantly deteriorate subsequent to the appraisal date. However, our policy is to obtain a full appraisal within one year from the date of the prior appraisal, unless the loan is in the process of foreclosure. A full appraisal is generally obtained at the date of foreclosure.
          The activity in the Parent Company’s allowance for loan losses was as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
         
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 814       8,049       830       13,630  
         
Loans charged-off
    (1,329 )     (5,741 )     (1,325 )     (10,043 )
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
                       
         
Net charge-offs
    (1,329 )     (5,741 )     (1,325 )     (10,043 )
Provision for loan losses
    515       4,919       495       3,640  
         
Balance, end of period
  $       7,227             7,227  
         
          The $1.3 million of charge-offs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 were comprised of a $1.2 million charge-off of a commercial land loan and a $0.1 million charge-off of a commercial residential loan. The Parent Company reversed a $0.8 million specific valuation allowance related to the commercial land loan charged-off during the three months ended June 30, 2011.
          The $5.7 million of charge-offs during the three months ended June 30, 2010 related to one commercial residential loan. A specific reserve of $2.9 million was established on this loan during prior periods. The remaining charge-offs during the six months ended June 30, 2010 primarily related to two loans. One loan was charged-down $2.7 million upon the foreclosure and sale of the collateral. The other loan’s entire balance of $1.2 million was charged-off upon the sale of the remaining collateral. The Parent Company established specific reserves of $5.7 million on these two loans in prior periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
          Currently, the Parent Company’s principal source of liquidity is its cash and funds obtained from its wholly-owned work-out subsidiary. The Parent Company also may obtain funds through the issuance of equity and debt securities and through dividends, although no dividends from BankAtlantic are anticipated or contemplated for the foreseeable future. The Parent Company has used its funds to contribute capital to its subsidiaries, and fund operations, including funding servicing costs and real estate owned operating expenses of its wholly-owned work- out subsidiary. At June 30, 2011, BankAtlantic Bancorp had approximately $329.6 million of junior subordinated

105


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
debentures outstanding with maturities ranging from 2032 through 2037. The aggregate annual interest obligations on this indebtedness totaled approximately $14.6 million based on interest rates at June 30, 2011, which are generally indexed to three-month LIBOR. In order to preserve liquidity in the current economic environment, the Parent Company elected in February 2009 to commence deferring interest payments on all of its outstanding junior subordinated debentures and to cease paying cash dividends on its common stock. The terms of the junior subordinated debentures and the trust documents allow the Parent Company to defer payments of interest for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods without default or penalty. During the deferral period, the respective trusts have suspended the declaration and payment of dividends on the trust preferred securities. The deferral election began as of March 2009, and regularly scheduled quarterly interest payments aggregating $35.6 million that would otherwise have been paid during the 30 months ended June 30, 2011 were deferred. The Parent Company has the ability under the junior subordinated debentures to continue to defer interest payments for up to another 10 consecutive quarterly periods through ongoing appropriate notices to each of the trustees, and will make a decision each quarter as to whether to continue the deferral of interest. During the deferral period, interest will continue to accrue on the junior subordinated debentures at the stated coupon rate, including on the deferred interest, and the Parent Company will continue to record the interest expense associated with the junior subordinated debentures. During the deferral period, the Parent Company may not, among other things and with limited exceptions, pay cash dividends on or repurchase its common stock nor make any payment on outstanding debt obligations that rank equally with or junior to the junior subordinated debentures. The Parent Company may end the deferral period by paying all accrued and unpaid interest. The Parent Company anticipates that it will continue to defer interest on its junior subordinated debentures and will not pay dividends on its common stock for the foreseeable future. If the Parent Company continues to defer interest on its junior subordinated debentures through the year ended December 31, 2013, it will owe an aggregate of approximately $73.9 million of unpaid interest based on average interest rates as of June 30, 2011. The Company’s financial condition and liquidity could be adversely affected if interest payments continue to be deferred.
          The Parent Company has not received dividends from BankAtlantic since the year ended December 31, 2008. The ability of BankAtlantic to pay dividends or make other distributions to the Parent Company in subsequent periods is subject to regulatory approval as provided in the Bank Order. It is unlikely that the regulators will approve a dividend from BankAtlantic based on BankAtlantic’s results and other matters set forth in the Bank Order. As such, the Parent Company does not expect to receive cash dividends from BankAtlantic for the foreseeable future. The Parent Company may receive dividends from its asset work-out subsidiary upon the monetizing of the subsidiaries’ non-performing loans and real estate owned. However, the Parent Company may not be able to monetize the loans or real estate owned on acceptable terms, if at all.
          In February 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission registering to offer, from time to time, up to $75 million of Class A Common Stock, preferred stock, subscription rights, warrants or debt securities. A description of the securities offered and the expected use of the net proceeds from any sales will be outlined in a prospectus supplement if and when offered. On June 16, 2011, BankAtlantic Bancorp completed its rights offering under the registration statement issuing 15,129,524 shares of Class A Common Stock for net proceeds of $11.0 million. As a result of the completion of a $20 million rights offering during the year ended December 31, 2010 and the $11.3 million rights offering in June 2011, $43.7 million of securities remain available for future issuance under this registration statement. The Parent Company utilized the proceeds from the rights offering plus $9.0 million in cash to make a $20 million capital contribution to BankAtlantic.
          In October 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission registering the offer and sale of up to $125 million of Class A Common Stock through an underwritten public offering. This registration statement has not yet been declared effective and it is uncertain whether the Company will pursue the sale of any of the shares of Class A Common Stock under this registration statement.
          The Parent Company is generally required to provide BankAtlantic with managerial assistance and capital. Any such financing could be sought through public or private offerings, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Additionally, we could pursue financings at the Parent Company level or directly at BankAtlantic or both. Any financing involving the issuance of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A Common Stock or securities convertible or exercisable for our Class A Common Stock could be highly dilutive for our existing shareholders and any issuance of stock at the BankAtlantic level would dilute the Parent Company’s ownership interest in BankAtlantic. Such financing may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all.

106


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
          The Parent Company has the following cash and investments that it believes provide a source for potential liquidity at June 30, 2011.
                                 
    As of June 30, 2011  
            Gross     Gross        
    Carrying     Unrealized     Unrealized     Estimated  
(in thousands)   Value     Appreciation     Depreciation     Fair Value  
     
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 3,839                   3,839  
Securities available for sale
    10             1       9  
     
Total
  $ 3,849             1       3,848  
     
          The non-performing loans transferred to the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company may also provide a potential source of liquidity through workouts, repayments of the loans or sales of interests in the subsidiary. The balance of these loans and real estate owned at June 30, 2011 was $20.6 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Parent Company received net cash flows of $2.2 million from its work-out subsidiary. The Parent Company does not have debt maturing until March 2032 and has the ability to defer interest payments on its junior subordinated debentures until December 2013.
BankAtlantic Liquidity and Capital Resources
          BankAtlantic’s primary sources of funds are deposits; principal repayments of loans, tax certificates and securities available for sale; proceeds from the sale of loans, securities available for sale and real estate owned; proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase; advances from FHLB; Treasury and Federal Reserve lending programs; interest payments on loans and securities; capital contributions from the Parent Company and other funds generated by operations. These funds are primarily utilized to fund loan disbursements and purchases, deposit outflows, repayments of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, repayments of advances from FHLB and other borrowings, purchases of tax certificates and securities available for sale, acquisitions of properties and equipment, and operating expenses. BankAtlantic’s liquidity will depend on its ability to generate sufficient cash to support loan demand, to meet deposit withdrawals, and to pay operating expenses. BankAtlantic’s securities portfolio provides an internal source of liquidity through its short-term investments as well as scheduled maturities and interest payments. Loan repayments and loan sales also provide an internal source of liquidity. BankAtlantic maintained excess cash balances during the six months ended June 30, 2011 in order to fund the June 2011 sale of the Tampa branch network and improve liquidity and its risk-based regulatory capital ratios. BankAtlantic’s liquidity is also dependent, in part, on its ability to maintain or increase deposit levels and availability under lines of credit and Treasury and Federal Reserve lending programs. BankAtlantic’s ability to increase or maintain deposits is impacted by competition from other financial institutions and alternative investments as well as the current low interest rate environment. Such competition, an increase in interest rates or an increase in liquidity needs, may require BankAtlantic to offer higher interest rates to maintain deposits, which may not be successful in generating deposits, and which would increase its cost of funds or reduce its net interest income. BankAtlantic is restricted by banking regulators from offering interest rates on its deposits which are significantly higher than market area rates. Additionally, BankAtlantic’s current lines of credit may not be available when needed as these lines of credit are subject to periodic review and may be terminated or reduced at the discretion of the issuing institutions or reduced based on availability of qualifying collateral. BankAtlantic’s unused lines of credit decreased from $843 million as of December 31, 2010 to $832 million as of June 30, 2011 due to lower loan and securities available for sale balances partially offset by lower FHLB advance balances. Additionally, interest rate changes, additional collateral requirements, disruptions in the capital markets, deterioration in BankAtlantic’s financial condition, litigation or regulatory action may make borrowings unavailable or make terms of the borrowings and deposits less favorable. There is a risk that our cost of funds will increase and that the borrowing capacity from funding sources may decrease.
          The FHLB has granted BankAtlantic a line of credit capped at 30% of assets subject to available collateral, with a maximum term of ten years. BankAtlantic utilized its FHLB line of credit to obtain a $146.1 million letter of credit primarily securing public deposits as of June 30, 2011. There were no FHLB borrowings outstanding as of June 30, 2011. The line of credit is secured by a blanket lien on BankAtlantic’s residential mortgage loans and certain commercial real estate and consumer home equity loans. BankAtlantic’s unused available borrowings under this line of credit were approximately $541 million at June 30, 2011. An additional source of liquidity for BankAtlantic is its securities portfolio. As of June 30, 2011, BankAtlantic had $257 million of unpledged securities

107


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
that could be sold or pledged for additional borrowings with the FHLB, the Federal Reserve or other financial institutions. BankAtlantic is a participating institution in the Federal Reserve Treasury Investment Program for up to $1.8 million in funding and at June 30, 2011, BankAtlantic had $1.0 million of short-term borrowings outstanding under this program. BankAtlantic is also eligible to participate in the Federal Reserve’s discount window program under its secondary credit program. The amount that can be borrowed under this program is dependent on the delivery of collateral to the Federal Reserve, and BankAtlantic had unused available borrowings of approximately $33.8 million as of June 30, 2011, with no amounts outstanding under this program at June 30, 2011. We are not permitted to incur day-light overdrafts in our Federal Reserve bank account and accordingly, our intent is to continue to maintain sufficient funds at the Federal Reserve to support intraday activity. The above lines of credit are subject to periodic review and any of the above borrowings may be limited, or may not be available to us at all or additional collateral could be required, in which case BankAtlantic’s liquidity could be materially adversely affected.
          At June 30, 2011, BankAtlantic had no securities sold under agreements to repurchase outstanding. During the second quarter of 2011, BankAtlantic discontinued entering into repurchase agreements with its customers and transferred $12.2 million of securities sold under repurchase agreements to non-interest bearing deposits in June 2011. Additionally, BankAtlantic had total cash on hand or with other financial institutions of $430.5 million at June 30, 2011.
          Included in deposits at June 30, 2011 was $9.2 million in brokered deposits. BankAtlantic is currently restricted by its regulators from acquiring additional brokered deposits or renewing its existing brokered deposits, and expects the balance of its brokered deposits to continue to decline.
          BankAtlantic’s liquidity may be affected by unforeseen demands on cash. Our objective in managing liquidity is to maintain sufficient resources of available liquid assets to address our funding needs. Multiple market disruptions and regulatory actions may make it more difficult for us and for financial institutions in general to borrow money. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty how long these adverse market conditions may continue, nor can we anticipate the degree that such market conditions may impact our operations. Deterioration in the performance of other financial institutions may adversely impact the ability of all financial institutions to access liquidity. Further deterioration in the financial markets or adverse regulatory actions may further impact us or result in additional market-wide liquidity problems, and affect our liquidity position. We believe BankAtlantic has improved its liquidity position during the year ended December 31, 2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2011 by paying down borrowings and reducing assets.
          BankAtlantic’s commitment to originate and purchase loans was $16.7 million and $5.4 million, respectively, at June 30, 2011 compared to $30.1 million of commitments to originate loans at June 30, 2010. BankAtlantic had no commitments to purchase loans at June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2011, total loan commitments represented approximately 0.81% of net loans receivable.
          BankAtlantic’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the table below and are compared to the prompt corrective action (“PCA”) “well capitalized” requirements and the capital requirements set forth in the Bank Order (dollars in thousands):

108


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
                                                 
                    PCA Defined     Bank Order  
    Actual     Well Capitalized     Requirements  
    Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio  
             
As of June 30, 2011:
                                               
 
                                               
Total risk-based capital
  $ 368,196       14.52 %   $ 253,522       10.00 %   $ 354,930       14.00 %
Tier I risk-based capital
  $ 313,897       12.38 %   $ 152,133       6.00 %                
Tangible capital
  $ 313,897       8.24 %   $ 57,119       1.50 %                
Tier 1/Core capital
  $ 313,897       8.24 %   $ 190,398       5.00 %   $ 304,637       8.00 %
As of December 31, 2010:
                                               
 
                                               
Total risk-based capital
  $ 334,601       11.72 %   $ 285,541       10.00 %                
Tier I risk-based capital
  $ 276,362       9.68 %   $ 171,325       6.00 %                
Tangible capital
  $ 276,362       6.22 %   $ 66,672       1.50 %                
Tier 1/Core capital
  $ 276,362       6.22 %   $ 222,240       5.00 %                
          Pursuant to the Bank Order, BankAtlantic was required to attain by June 30, 2011 and maintain a tier 1/core capital ratio equal to or greater than 8% and a total risk-based capital ratio equal to or greater than 14%. BankAtlantic historically maintained its regulatory capital ratios at levels that exceeded prompt corrective action “well capitalized” requirements; however, based on BankAtlantic’s risk profile, the OTS raised its regulatory capital requirements above the “well capitalized” amounts. The Parent Company and BankAtlantic will seek to maintain the higher capital requirements under the Bank Order through efforts that may include the issuance of its Class A Common Stock through a public or private offering. Additionally, BankAtlantic may continue to seek to reduce its asset size in order to improve its regulatory capital ratios, although this may make it more difficult to achieve profitability. The Company may not be successful in raising additional capital in subsequent periods upon the contemplated terms, or at all. The inability to raise capital or otherwise continue to meet regulatory requirements in the future would have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
          BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Contractual Obligations and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements as of June 30, 2011 were (in thousands):
                                         
    Payments Due by Period (1)(2)  
            Less than                     After 5  
Contractual Obligations   Total     1 year     1-3 years     4-5 years     years  
     
Time deposits
  $ 454,279       370,451       65,577       16,951       1,300  
Long-term debt
    351,643             57,448             294,195  
Operating lease obligations held for sublease
    15,186       706       1,305       1,288       11,887  
Operating lease obligations held for use
    32,921       5,232       8,703       5,232       13,754  
Pension obligation
    18,443       1,496       3,155       3,545       10,247  
Other obligations
    13,006       3,406       6,400       3,200        
     
Total contractual cash obligations
  $ 885,478       381,291       142,588       30,216       331,383  
     
 
(1)   Payments due by period are based on contractual maturities.
 
(2)   The above table excludes interest payments on interest bearing liabilities.

109


Table of Contents

Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act ). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

110


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in our legal proceedings from those disclosed in the “Legal Proceedings” sections of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
Bluegreen
Tennessee Audit Matter
In 2005, the State of Tennessee Audit Division (the “Division”) audited certain subsidiaries within Bluegreen Resorts for the period from December 1, 2001 through December 31, 2004. On September 23, 2006, the Division issued a notice of assessment for approximately $652,000 of accommodations tax based on the use of Bluegreen Vacation Club accommodations by Bluegreen Vacation Club members who became members through the purchase of non-Tennessee property. Bluegreen believes the attempt to impose such a tax is contrary to Tennessee law and have vigorously opposed such assessment by the Division. An informal conference was held in December 2007 to discuss this matter with representatives of the Division. No formal resolution of the issue was reached during the conference. By letter dated May 25, 2011, the State of Tennessee Department of Revenue issued a decision in which it held that two of the three types of transactions in question were taxable. The Department of Revenue confirmed that Bluegreen had already remitted the proper amount of sales tax due on one of the two types of taxable transactions, but have taken the position that we owed a total of $731,000 in taxes and interest based on the second type of transaction. On August 1, 2011 Bluegreen filed suit in the Chancery Court of Davidson County, Tennessee for the purpose of invalidating and setting aside the tax assessment made against Bluegreen by the Department of Revenue.
Joseph M. Scheyd, Jr., P.A. vs. Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc.; Hubert A. Laird; and MSB of Destin, Inc., in the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit in and for Okaloosa County, Florida
During 2006, Joseph M. Scheyd, Jr., P.A., as escrow agent, brought an interpleader action seeking a determination as to whether Bluegreen, as purchaser, or Hubert A. Laird and MSB of Destin, Inc., as seller, were entitled to the $1.4 million escrow deposit being maintained with the escrow agent pursuant to a purchase and sale contract for real property located in Destin, Florida. Bluegreen maintains that its decision not to close on the purchase of the property was proper under the terms of the purchase and sale contract and therefore is entitled to a return of the full escrow deposit. On June 1, 2011, the trial court made a finding that Bluegreen breached the purchase and sale contract and that the plaintiff was entitled to the escrow deposit and all accrued interest. Bluegreen has filed a notice of appeal with the First District Court of Appeal seeking the result of the trial court’s decision. In connection with the appeal, the escrow deposit and all accrued interest have been placed in the appropriate Court registry pending the outcome of the appeal.
State of Florida Matter Relating to Timeshare Sales and Marketing
The Office of the Attorney General for the State of Florida (the “AGSF”) has advised Bluegreen that it has accumulated a number of consumer complaints since 2005 against Bluegreen and/or its affiliates related to timeshare sales and marketing, and has requested that Bluegreen propose a resolution on a collective basis of any outstanding complaints. The AGSF has also requested that Bluegreen enter into a written agreement in which to establish a process and timeframe for determining consumer eligibility for relief (including, where applicable, monetary restitution). Bluegreen has determined that many of these complaints were previously addressed and/or resolved. Bluegreen is cooperating with the State and does not believe this matter will have a material effect on its results of operations, financial condition or on Bluegreen’s sales and marketing activities in Florida.
BankAtlantic Bancorp
In re BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 0:07-cv-61542-UU, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
On October 29, 2007, Joseph C. Hubbard filed a class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against BankAtlantic Bancorp and five of its current or former officers. The defendants in this action are BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., James A. White, Valerie C. Toalson, Jarett S. Levan, John E. Abdo, and Alan B. Levan. The Complaint, which was later amended, alleges that during the purported class period of November 9, 2005 through October 25, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp and the named officers knowingly and/or recklessly made

111


Table of Contents

misrepresentations of material fact regarding BankAtlantic and specifically BankAtlantic’s loan portfolio and allowance for loan losses. The Complaint asserted claims for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 and sought unspecified damages. On December 12, 2007, the Court consolidated into Hubbard a separately filed action captioned Alarm Specialties, Inc. v. BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., No. 0:07—cv-61623-WPD. On February 5, 2008, the Court appointed State-Boston Retirement System lead plaintiff and Lubaton Sucharow LLP to serve as lead counsel pursuant to the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.
On November 18, 2010, a jury returned a verdict awarding $2.41 per share to shareholders who purchased shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Class A Common Stock during the period of April 26, 2007 to October 26, 2007 and retained those shares until the end of the period. The jury rejected the plaintiffs’ claim for the six month period from October 19, 2006 to April 25, 2007. Prior to the beginning of the trial, plaintiffs abandoned any claim for any prior period. On April 25, 2011, the Court granted defendants’ post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law and vacated the jury verdict, resulting in a judgment in favor of all defendants on all claims. The Plaintiffs have appealed the Court’s order setting aside the jury verdict.
Jordan Arizmendi, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. BankAtlantic, Case No. 09-059341 (19), Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit for Broward County, Florida.
In November 2010, the two pending class action complaints against BankAtlantic associated with overdraft fees were consolidated. The Complaint, which asserts claims for breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, alleges that BankAtlantic improperly re-sequenced debit card transactions from largest to smallest, improperly assessed overdraft fees on positive balances, and improperly imposed sustained overdraft fees on customers. BankAtlantic has filed a motion to dismiss which is pending with the Court.
Office of Thrift Supervision Overdraft Processing Examination
As previously disclosed, the Office of Thrift Supervision advised BankAtlantic that it had determined that BankAtlantic had engaged in deceptive and unfair practices in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act relating to certain of BankAtlantic’s deposit-related products. On June 2, 2011, the OTS concluded that BankAtlantic engaged in certain deceptive and unfair practices in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and OTS regulations, and requested that BankAtlantic submit a restitution plan for OTS’s consideration. The OTS also advised BankAtlantic that BankAtlantic could be subject to civil money penalties. BankAtlantic believes it has complied with all applicable laws and OTS guidelines and on July 5, 2011, BankAtlantic filed an appeal of the OTS positions. That appeal is now before the OCC which will review the issues under its process and guidelines.
Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation
BankAtlantic Bancorp has received a notice of investigation from the Securities and Exchange Commission, Miami Regional Office and subpoenas for information. The subpoenas requested a broad range of documents relating to, among other matters, recent and pending litigation to which BankAtlantic Bancorp is or was a party, certain of BankAtlantic Bancorp’s non-performing, non-accrual and charged-off loans, BankAtlantic Bancorp’s cost saving measures, loan classifications, BankAtlantic Bancorp’s asset workout subsidiary, and the recent Orders with the OTS entered into by BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and BankAtlantic. Various current and former employees also received subpoenas for documents and testimony.
The Miami regional office staff of the SEC has indicated that it is recommending that the SEC bring a civil action against BankAtlantic Bancorp alleging that BankAtlantic Bancorp violated certain provisions of federal securities laws, including Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. BankAtlantic Bancorp was also informed that its chief executive officer received a similar communication. In communications between BankAtlantic Bancorp’s counsel and the Miami regional office staff, BankAtlantic Bancorp has learned that the basis for the recommended actions were many of the same arguments brought in the private class action securities litigation recently concluded at the district court level in favor of BankAtlantic Bancorp and the individual defendants. In addition, the Miami regional office staff raised issues relating to the classification and valuation of certain loans included in BankAtlantic Bancorp’s financial information for the last quarter of 2007 and in its annual report on Form 10-K for the 2007 fiscal year. BankAtlantic Bancorp and its CEO provided a response to the issues raised by the Miami regional office staff. If litigation is brought, the SEC may seek remedies including an injunction against future violations of federal securities laws, civil money penalties and an officer and director bar. BankAtlantic Bancorp believes that it has fulfilled all of its obligations under securities laws and, if such actions are brought by the SEC against BankAtlantic Bancorp and/or any of its officers, such actions would be vigorously defended.

112


Table of Contents

D.W. Hugo, individually and on behalf of Nominal Defendant BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. vs. BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., Alan B. Levan, Jarett S. Levan, Jay C. McClung, Marcia K. Snyder, Valerie Toalson, James A. White, John E. Abdo, D. Keith Cobb, Steven M. Coldren, and David A. Lieberman, Case No. 0:08-cv-61018-UU, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
In July 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp, certain officers and Directors were named in a lawsuit which alleges that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties by engaging in certain lending practices with respect to BankAtlantic Bancorp’s Commercial Real Estate Loan Portfolio. The Complaint further alleges that BankAtlantic Bancorp ‘s public filings and statements did not fully disclose the risks associated with the Commercial Real Estate Loan Portfolio and sought damages on behalf of BankAtlantic Bancorp . In July 2011, the case was dismissed and the parties exchanged mutual releases and neither the defendants nor BankAtlantic Bancorp made any monetary payments.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     There have been no material changes in the risks and uncertainties that we face from those disclosed in the “Risk Factors” sections of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
Item 6. Exhibits
     
Exhibit 10.1 *
  Settlement Agreement dated April 25, 2011 by and among AmT CADC Venture, LLC, f/k/a AmTrust CADC Venture LLC         ,successor-in-interest to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for AmTrust Bank , Woodbridge Holdings, LLC, successor by merger to Woodbridge Holdings Corporation (f/k/a Levitt Corporation), and Carolina Oak Homes, LLC successor to Levitt and Sons of Jasper County, LLC
 
   
Exhibit 31.1 *
  Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
Exhibit 31.2 *
  Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
Exhibit 31.3 *
  Chief Accounting Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
Exhibit 32.1 **
  Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
Exhibit 32.2 **
  Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
Exhibit 32.3 **
  Chief Accounting Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
   
101.INS ***
  XBRL Instance Document
 
   
101.SCH ***
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
   
101.CAL ***
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
   
101.DEF ***
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
   
101.LAB ***
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
 
   
101.PRE ***
  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
*   Exhibits filed with this Form 10-Q
 
**   Exhibits furnished with this Form 10-Q
 
***   Pursuant to Rule 406T of Exchange Regulation S-T promulgated by the SEC, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

113


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  BFC FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 
 
Date: August 15, 2011  By:   /s/ Alan B. Levan    
    Alan B. Levan, Chief Executive Officer   
       
 
     
Date: August 15, 2011  By:   /s/ John K. Grelle    
    John K. Grelle, Chief Financial Officer   
       
 
     
Date: August 15, 2011  By:   /s/ Maria R. Scheker    
    Maria R. Scheker, Chief Accounting Officer