Bluegreen Vacations Holding Corp - Quarter Report: 2011 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2011
OR
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission File Number
001-09071
001-09071
BFC Financial Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Florida | 59-2022148 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification Number) | |
2100 West Cypress Creek Road | ||
Fort Lauderdale, Florida | 33309 | |
(Address of Principal executive office) | (Zip Code) |
(954) 940-4900
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock as of May 10,
2011 is as follows:
Class A Common Stock of $.01 par value, 68,521,497 shares outstanding as of May 10, 2011.
Class B Common Stock of $.01 par value, 6,859,751 shares outstanding as of May 10, 2011.
Class B Common Stock of $.01 par value, 6,859,751 shares outstanding as of May 10, 2011.
BFC Financial Corporation
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition Unaudited
(In thousands, except share data)
(In thousands, except share data)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 164,845 | 178,868 | |||||
Interest bearing deposits in other banks |
656,424 | 455,538 | ||||||
Restricted cash (including held by variable interest entities (VIE) of $38,735 in 2011
and $41,243 in 2010) |
60,954 | 62,249 | ||||||
Securities available for sale at fair value |
414,499 | 465,020 | ||||||
Investment securities at cost or amortized cost (fair value: $1,833 in 2011 and $2,033
in 2010) |
1,833 | 2,033 | ||||||
Tax certificates, net of allowance of $9,287 in 2011 and $8,811 in 2010 |
77,837 | 89,789 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost which approximates fair value |
43,557 | 43,557 | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
49,455 | 29,765 | ||||||
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $155,051 in 2011 and $162,139 in
2010 |
2,813,530 | 3,009,721 | ||||||
Notes receivable (including gross securitized notes of $505,459 in 2011 and
$533,479 in 2010) net of allowance of $86,370 in 2011 and $93,398 in 2010 |
556,452 | 574,969 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
20,601 | 22,010 | ||||||
Real estate inventory |
337,188 | 343,497 | ||||||
Real estate owned and other repossessed assets |
75,146 | 74,488 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
12,869 | 12,455 | ||||||
Properties and equipment, net |
213,788 | 218,665 | ||||||
Goodwill and intangible assets, net |
89,834 | 91,159 | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
36,909 | 37,334 | ||||||
Prepaid Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) deposit insurance assessment |
18,823 | 22,008 | ||||||
Other assets |
80,908 | 79,941 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 5,725,452 | 5,813,066 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Interest bearing deposits |
$ | 2,735,701 | 2,758,032 | |||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
878,873 | 792,012 | ||||||
Deposits held for sale |
390,432 | 341,146 | ||||||
Total deposits |
4,005,006 | 3,891,190 | ||||||
Advances from FHLB |
45,000 | 170,000 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
17,006 | 21,524 | ||||||
Other short term borrowings |
1,367 | 1,240 | ||||||
Receivable-backed notes payable, (including $430,329 held by VIE in 2011
and $459,030 in 2010) |
536,407 | 569,214 | ||||||
Notes and mortgage notes payable and other borrowings |
228,867 | 239,571 | ||||||
Junior subordinated debentures |
465,453 | 461,568 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
30,457 | 28,663 | ||||||
Deferred gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary |
| 11,305 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
179,610 | 186,634 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
5,509,173 | 5,580,909 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Preferred stock of $.01 par value; authorized - 10,000,000 shares: |
||||||||
Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock $.01 par value; authorized 15,000 shares
issued and outstanding 15,000 shares with redemption value of $1,000 per share |
11,029 | 11,029 | ||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Class A common stock of $.01 par value, authorized 150,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 68,521,497 in 2011 and 2010 |
685 | 685 | ||||||
Class B common stock of $.01 par value, authorized 20,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 6,859,751 in 2011 and 2010 |
69 | 69 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
231,522 | 230,748 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(91,652 | ) | (88,853 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
(228 | ) | 223 | |||||
Total BFC Financial Corporation (BFC) shareholders equity |
140,396 | 142,872 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
64,854 | 78,256 | ||||||
Total equity |
205,250 | 221,128 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 5,725,452 | 5,813,066 | |||||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
(In thousands, except per share data)
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(As Revised) | ||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||
Real Estate and Other: |
||||||||
Sales of real estate |
$ | 41,623 | 27,852 | |||||
Other resorts and communities operations revenue |
17,634 | 16,021 | ||||||
Other revenues |
11,035 | 11,187 | ||||||
Interest income |
22,433 | 24,214 | ||||||
92,725 | 79,274 | |||||||
Financial Services: |
||||||||
Interest income |
40,064 | 48,087 | ||||||
Service charges on deposits |
12,032 | 15,048 | ||||||
Other service charges and fees |
7,191 | 7,378 | ||||||
Securities activities, net |
(24 | ) | 3,138 | |||||
Other non-interest income |
3,527 | 2,526 | ||||||
62,790 | 76,177 | |||||||
Total revenues |
155,515 | 155,451 | ||||||
Costs and Expenses |
||||||||
Real Estate and Other: |
||||||||
Cost of sales of real estate |
9,675 | 8,103 | ||||||
Cost of sales of other resorts and communities operations |
13,967 | 12,690 | ||||||
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized |
18,625 | 21,258 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
51,798 | 54,104 | ||||||
94,065 | 96,155 | |||||||
Financial Services: |
||||||||
Interest expense |
8,527 | 11,844 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
27,812 | 30,755 | ||||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
19,290 | 25,378 | ||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
12,585 | 13,582 | ||||||
Advertising and promotion |
1,695 | 1,944 | ||||||
Check losses |
299 | 432 | ||||||
Professional fees |
3,359 | 2,887 | ||||||
Supplies and postage |
902 | 998 | ||||||
Telecommunication |
575 | 534 | ||||||
Provision for tax certificates |
779 | 733 | ||||||
Lease termination costs |
(849 | ) | | |||||
Employee termination costs |
(154 | ) | | |||||
Impairment of loans held for sale |
628 | | ||||||
Impairment of real estate owned |
2,323 | 143 | ||||||
FDIC deposit insurance assessment |
3,305 | 2,358 | ||||||
Other expenses |
4,563 | 5,021 | ||||||
85,639 | 96,609 | |||||||
Total costs and expenses |
179,704 | 192,764 | ||||||
Gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary |
11,305 | | ||||||
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates |
1,777 | 193 | ||||||
Other income |
574 | 438 | ||||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
(10,533 | ) | (36,682 | ) | ||||
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
1,793 | (3,831 | ) | |||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(12,326 | ) | (32,851 | ) | ||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
| (249 | ) | |||||
Net loss |
(12,326 | ) | (33,100 | ) | ||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(9,715 | ) | (13,320 | ) | ||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
(2,611 | ) | (19,780 | ) | ||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Net loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (2,799 | ) | (19,968 | ) | |||
(CONTINUED)
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(As Revised) | ||||||||
Basic and Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Common Share
Attributable to BFC (Note 18): |
||||||||
Basic Loss Per Common Share |
||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.04 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||
Loss per share from discontinued operations |
| | ||||||
Net loss per common share |
$ | (0.04 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||
Diluted Loss Per Common Share |
||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.04 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||
Loss per share from discontinued operations |
| | ||||||
Net loss per common share |
$ | (0.04 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||
Basic weighted average number of
common shares outstanding |
75,381 | 75,376 | ||||||
Diluted weighted average number of common
and common equivalent shares outstanding |
75,381 | 75,376 | ||||||
Amounts attributable to BFC common shareholders: |
||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
$ | (2,799 | ) | (19,719 | ) | |||
Loss from discontinued operations |
| (249 | ) | |||||
Net loss |
$ | (2,799 | ) | (19,968 | ) | |||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss Unaudited
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(As Revised) | ||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (12,326 | ) | (33,100 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities available for sale, net
of tax of $0 in 2011 and $969 in 2010 |
(864 | ) | 2,470 | |||||
Realized gains reclassified into net loss |
| (3,139 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive income |
(864 | ) | (669 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive loss |
(13,190 | ) | (33,769 | ) | ||||
Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(10,128 | ) | (14,712 | ) | ||||
Total comprehensive loss attributable to BFC |
$ | (3,062 | ) | (19,057 | ) | |||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity Unaudited
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
(In thousands)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
(In thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compre- | Total | Non- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares of Common | Class A | Class B | Additional | hensive | BFC | controlling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Outstanding | Common | Common | Paid-in | Accumulated | Income | Shareholders | Interest in | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Class B | Stock | Stock | Capital | Deficit | (Loss) | Equity | Subsidiaries | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
68,521 | 6,860 | $ | 685 | $ | 69 | $ | 230,748 | $ | (88,853 | ) | $ | 223 | $ | 142,872 | $ | 78,256 | $ | 221,128 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (2,611 | ) | (2,611 | ) | (9,715 | ) | (12,326 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
| | | | | | (451 | ) | (451 | ) | (413 | ) | (864 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net effect of subsidiaries capital
transactions attributable to BFC |
| | | | 609 | | | 609 | | 609 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest net effect of
subsidiaries capital transactions |
| | | | | | | | (3,274 | ) | (3,274 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends on 5% Preferred Stock |
| | | | | (188 | ) | | (188 | ) | | (188 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation
related to stock options |
| | | | 165 | | | 165 | | 165 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2011 |
68,521 | 6,860 | $ | 685 | $ | 69 | $ | 231,522 | $ | (91,652 | ) | $ | (228 | ) | $ | 140,396 | $ | 64,854 | $ | 205,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Unaudited
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(As Revised) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 48,887 | 29,102 | |||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from redemption and maturity of investment securities
and tax certificates |
20,767 | 34,866 | ||||||
Purchase of investment securities and tax certificates |
(9,415 | ) | (21,953 | ) | ||||
Purchase of securities available for sale |
(8,149 | ) | (13,351 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
1,194 | 68,963 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale |
56,282 | 32,138 | ||||||
Proceeds from the maturities of interest bearing deposits |
2,480 | | ||||||
Decrease in restricted cash |
1,295 | 6,707 | ||||||
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates |
139 | 140 | ||||||
Net repayments of loans |
135,346 | 118,217 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sales of loans
transferred to held for sale |
3,100 | 26,421 | ||||||
Improvements to real estate owned |
| (779 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sales of real estate owned |
3,245 | 3,269 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of office property and equipment |
106 | 539 | ||||||
Purchases of office property and equipment |
(980 | ) | (2,612 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
205,410 | 252,565 | ||||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Net increase in deposits |
113,815 | 93,871 | ||||||
Net repayments from FHLB advances |
(125,010 | ) | (130,000 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in securities
sold under agreements to repurchase |
(4,518 | ) | 206 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in short term borrowings |
127 | (175 | ) | |||||
Prepayment of bonds payable |
| (661 | ) | |||||
Repayment of notes, mortgage notes and bonds payable |
(53,472 | ) | (51,576 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from notes, mortgage notes and bonds payable |
9,238 | 8,205 | ||||||
Payments for debt issuance costs |
(742 | ) | | |||||
Preferred stock dividends paid |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A common
stock
to non-BFC shareholders |
| 65 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest distributions |
(3,871 | ) | (134 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(64,621 | ) | (80,387 | ) | ||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
189,676 | 201,280 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
588,846 | 316,080 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents held for sale |
(333 | ) | | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 778,189 | (a) | 517,360 | ||||
(CONTINUED)
8
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Unaudited
(In thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Unaudited
(In thousands)
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(As Revised) | ||||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||
Interest paid on borrowings and deposits |
$ | 19,584 | 21,215 | |||||
Income taxes paid |
3,277 | 128 | ||||||
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities: |
||||||||
Loans and tax certificates transferred to real estate owned |
6,679 | 7,503 | ||||||
Long-lived assets held-for-use transferred to assets held for sale |
| 1,919 | ||||||
Long-lived assets held-for-sale transferred to assets held for use |
| 1,239 | ||||||
Decrease in BFC accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
taxes |
(451 | ) | 723 | |||||
Net increase in BFC shareholders equity from
the effect of subsidiaries capital transactions, net of taxes |
609 | 814 | ||||||
Net decrease in equity resulting from cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
| (2,569 | ) |
(a) | Includes interest bearing time deposits in other banks totaling $43.1 million as of March 31, 2011. These time deposits had original maturities of greater than 90 days and are not considered cash equivalents. |
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
9
Table of Contents
BFC Financial Corporation
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Presentation of Interim Financial Statements
BFC Financial Corporation (BFC or, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise
requires, we, us, our or the Company) is a diversified holding company whose principal
holdings include a controlling interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries,
including BankAtlantic (BankAtlantic Bancorp), a controlling interest in Bluegreen Corporation
and its subsidiaries (Bluegreen), and a non-controlling interest in Benihana Inc. (Benihana).
BFC also holds interests in other investments and subsidiaries. As a result of its position as the
controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC is a unitary savings bank holding company
regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).
Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) require that BFC consolidate the financial
results of the entities in which it has controlling interest. As a consequence, the assets and
liabilities of all such entities are presented on a consolidated basis in BFCs financial
statements. However, except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of the consolidated
entities, including BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen and Woodbridge Holdings, LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of BFC (Woodbridge), are not direct obligations of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC.
Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC absent a dividend or distribution
from those entities. The recognition by BFC of income from controlled entities is determined based
on the total percent of economic ownership in those entities. At March 31, 2011, we owned
approximately 52% of Bluegreens common stock and had an approximately 45% ownership interest and
70% voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp.
Our business activities currently consist of (i) Real Estate and Other and (ii) Financial
Services. We currently report our results of operations through six reportable segments. Our Real
Estate and Other business activities include the following four reportable segments: BFC
Activities; Real Estate Operations; and Bluegreen Resorts and Bluegreen Communities, the segments
through which Bluegreens results of operations are reported. The Companys Financial Services
business activities include BankAtlantic Bancorps results of operations and contain the other two
reportable segments: BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company. See Note 15 for
additional information about our segments.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with GAAP for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In managements
opinion, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments,
which include normal recurring adjustments, as are necessary for a fair statement of the Companys
consolidated financial condition at March 31, 2011; the consolidated results of operations,
comprehensive loss and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010; and the
changes in consolidated equity for the three months ended March 31, 2011. Operating results for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2011. These unaudited consolidated financial
statements and related notes are presented as permitted by Form 10-Q
and should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2010. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. As used throughout this document, the term fair value reflects the Companys
estimate of fair value as discussed herein. Certain amounts for prior periods have been
reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation.
Revisions to Consolidated Financial Statements
On November 16, 2009, we purchased an additional 7.4 million shares of Bluegreens common
stock. This share purchase increased our ownership interest in Bluegreen to approximately 16.9
million shares, or approximately 52%, of Bluegreens outstanding common stock. Accordingly, we are
deemed to have a controlling interest in Bluegreen and, under GAAP, Bluegreens results are
consolidated in our financial statements. The Company accounted for the acquisition of a
controlling interest in Bluegreen in accordance with the accounting guidance for business
combinations, pursuant to which management was required to evaluate the fair value of Bluegreens
assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date. As previously disclosed, the allocation of the
purchase price was based on preliminary estimates of the fair value of Bluegreens inventory and
contracts, and was subject to change within the measurement period as valuations were finalized.
Additionally, any offset relating to amortization/accretion was also retrospectively adjusted in
the appropriate periods. As discussed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010, during the fourth quarter of 2010, the
10
Table of Contents
Company finalized its valuations and adjusted the preliminary value assigned to the assets and
liabilities of Bluegreen in order to reflect additional information obtained since the November 16,
2009 share acquisition date. These changes resulted in the following adjustments at December 31,
2009: a decrease of approximately $6.9 million to real estate inventory; an increase in other
assets of approximately $3.5 million; an increase in other liabilities of approximately $4.1
million; and a decrease in deferred income taxes of approximately $7.1 million. Such adjustments
resulted in a decrease to the bargain purchase gain related to the share acquisition for the year
ended December 31, 2009 from $183.1 million to $182.8 million. The Companys Consolidated Statement
of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was revised to reflect the impact of the
amortization/accretion associated with the above adjustments which resulted in a decrease to the
net loss for the quarter of approximately $88,000 compared to the previously reported amount.
Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2010, management identified certain errors in its
previously reported financial statements for 2010 and 2009. Because these errors were not material
to the Companys financial statements for 2010 or 2009, individually or in the aggregate, the
Company revised its previously reported 2010 first, second and third quarter financial statements
and its 2009 annual financial statements. These adjustments related to the following: the
recognition of interest income associated with the acquired notes receivable in accordance with the
accounting guidance Loans and Debt Securities with Deteriorated Credit Quality; an adjustment to
the provision for loan losses for the acquired notes receivable; interest expense recognition for
notes payable of certain defaulted debt at Woodbridges subsidiaries, Core Communities, LLC (Core
or Core Communities) and Carolina Oak Homes, LLC (Carolina Oak), at the defaulted interest
rate, where the stated interest rate was previously used; the recognition of income tax benefits
associated with unrealized gains in accumulated other comprehensive income; and an adjustment to
deferred taxes related to an impairment to real estate inventory which was reflected after November
16, 2009 and accounted for as a temporary difference, which should have been included in the
determination of deferred taxes at the acquisition date, as part of the Bluegreen purchase price
allocation.
The Companys financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2010 contained herein
reflect the adjustments and revisions described above. The Company will present the impact of these
adjustments and revisions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 in future filings when it discloses them as comparable
periods. The quarterly period adjustments and revisions were previously disclosed in Note 40 to the
Companys audited consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
11
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the quarterly results for the three months ended March 31, 2010
as it was previously reported and as revised (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
(As Previously | ||||||||||||
(As Revised) | Reported) | |||||||||||
Revenues |
(1 | ) | $ | 155,451 | 152,180 | |||||||
Costs and expenses |
(2 | ) | 192,764 | 192,780 | ||||||||
(37,313 | ) | (40,600 | ) | |||||||||
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates |
193 | 4 | ||||||||||
Other income |
438 | 754 | ||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
(36,682 | ) | (39,842 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Benefit for income taxes |
(3 | ) | (3,831 | ) | (4,591 | ) | ||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(32,851 | ) | (35,251 | ) | ||||||||
Discontinued operations, net of income tax |
(249 | ) | (249 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss |
(33,100 | ) | (35,500 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(4 | ) | (13,320 | ) | (14,665 | ) | ||||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
(19,780 | ) | (20,835 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred Stock dividends |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (19,968 | ) | (21,023 | ) | |||||||
Basic Loss per Common Share |
||||||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.26 | ) | (0.28 | ) | |||||||
Loss per share from discontinued operations |
| | ||||||||||
Net loss per common share |
$ | (0.26 | ) | (0.28 | ) | |||||||
Diluted Loss per Common Share |
||||||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.26 | ) | (0.28 | ) | |||||||
Loss per share from discontinued operations |
| | ||||||||||
Net loss per common share |
$ | (0.26 | ) | (0.28 | ) | |||||||
1) | Includes revisions related to the provision for loan losses and recognition of interest income in accordance with the accounting guidance for Loans and Debt Securities with Deteriorated Credit Quality for Bluegreens acquired notes receivable. The revisions increased revenues by approximately $4.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. | |
2) | Includes certain revisions related to the interest rates used in the calculation of interest expense on defaulted notes payable at Core Communities and Carolina Oak and revisions related to the subsequent amortization from the measurement period adjustments of real estate inventory and certain contracts in connection with the Bluegreen share purchase. These revisions resulted in an increase to costs and expenses by $1.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. | |
3) | Includes tax adjustments as they relate to the revisions noted above and the recognition of income tax benefits associated with unrealized gains in accumulated other comprehensive income at BankAtlantic Bancorp and BFC, which resulted in a net decrease of $760,000 in the tax benefit for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. | |
4) | As a result of the revisions noted above, the net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased by $1.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. |
12
Table of Contents
The principal amount of BankAtlantic Bancorp loans set forth in the table in Note 10 to
the Companys financial statements in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010
were incorrectly identified as reflecting loan-to-value ratios obtained as of the first quarter of
2010 when in fact the amounts instead reflected loan-to-value ratios at loan origination. The
table below labeled As Corrected reflects loan-to-value ratios as of December 31, 2010 based on
first quarter of 2010 valuations. The table below labeled As Reported reflects the table
contained in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 which reflects loan-to-value ratios
at origination.
As Reported | As Corrected | |||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Residential | Residential | Residential | Residential | |||||||||||||
Loan-to-value ratios | Interest Only | Amortizing | Interest Only | Amortizing | ||||||||||||
Ratios not available |
$ | | 78,031 | 59,520 | 185,610 | |||||||||||
=<60% |
107,063 | 144,744 | 47,605 | 145,075 | ||||||||||||
60.1% - 70% |
118,679 | 103,891 | 33,005 | 49,732 | ||||||||||||
70.1% - 80% |
290,840 | 309,925 | 37,808 | 48,586 | ||||||||||||
80.1% - 90% |
17,055 | 23,982 | 47,574 | 47,039 | ||||||||||||
>90.1% |
16,609 | 13,212 | 324,734 | 197,743 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 550,246 | 673,785 | 550,246 | 673,785 | |||||||||||
2. Liquidity and Regulatory Considerations
BFC
Liquidity Considerations
Except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen and
Woodbridge are not direct obligations of BFC and generally are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the
assets of those entities are not available to BFC, absent a dividend or distribution from those
entities. BFCs principal sources of liquidity are its available cash, including tax refunds
received as a result of tax law changes, short-term investments, and dividends from Benihana. We
also expect to receive an additional $7.5 million tax refund, net of amounts payable under the
settlement agreement related to the bankruptcy filing of Levitt and Sons LLC and substantially all
of its subsidiaries, as discussed in Note 16 below.
We intend to use our available funds to fund operations and meet our obligations. We may also
use available funds to make additional investments in the companies within our consolidated group,
including participations in BankAtlantic Bancorps recently announced rights offering, invest in
equity securities and other investments, or repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our
share repurchase program. On September 21, 2009, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase
program which authorizes the repurchase of up to 20,000,000 shares of Class A and Class B Common
Stock at an aggregate cost of no more than $10 million. The share repurchase program replaced our
$10 million repurchase program that our Board of Directors approved in October 2006 which placed a
limitation on the number of shares which could be repurchased under the program at 1,750,000 shares
of Class A Common Stock. The current program, like the prior program, authorizes management, at its
discretion, to repurchase shares from time to time subject to market conditions and other factors.
No shares were repurchased during the years ended December 31, 2010 or 2009, or during the three
months ended March 31, 2011.
During June and July 2010, BFC acquired an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A Common Stock in connection with the exercise of subscription rights granted to it
in BankAtlantic Bancorps rights offering. The aggregate purchase price for those shares was $15.0
million. BFC exercised its basic subscription rights to purchase 5,986,865 shares, and the
remaining 4,013,135 shares were acquired by BFC pursuant to its over-subscription request. The
shares acquired in the rights offering increased BFCs ownership interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp
by approximately 8% to 45% and BFCs voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 5% to
71% as of July 2010. BankAtlantic Bancorp recently announced its intention to pursue a new rights
offering to its shareholders of up to $30 million of its Class A Common Stock. We currently intend
to support the rights offering and have indicated our willingness to participate; however, the
amount of our investment in the rights offering has not yet been determined by our Board of
Directors.
Since March 2009, BFC has not received cash dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic
13
Table of Contents
Bancorp is currently prohibited from paying dividends on its common stock without first receiving
the written non-objection of the OTS. In addition, during February 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp
elected to exercise its right to defer payments of interest on its trust preferred junior
subordinated debt. BankAtlantic Bancorp is permitted to defer quarterly interest payments for up to
20 consecutive quarters. During the deferral period, BankAtlantic Bancorp is prohibited from paying
dividends to its shareholders, including BFC. While BankAtlantic Bancorp can end the deferral
period at any time, BankAtlantic Bancorp has indicated that it anticipates that it may continue to
defer such interest payments for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, BFC has not received cash
dividends from Bluegreen and does not expect to receive cash dividends from Bluegreen in the
foreseeable future. Certain of Bluegreens credit facilities contain terms which may limit the
payment of cash dividends.
We believe that our current financial condition and credit relationships, together with
anticipated cash flows from operating activities and other sources of funds, including tax refunds
and, if determined to be advisable, proceeds from the disposition of certain properties or
investments, will allow us to meet our anticipated near-term
liquidity needs at least through March 31, 2012. With respect to
long-term liquidity requirements, we may also seek to raise funds, subject to compliance with our
commitment to the OTS described below, through the incurrence of long-term secured or unsecured
indebtedness, the issuance of equity and/or debt securities or through the sale of assets; however
these alternatives may not be available to us on attractive terms, or at all.
Regulatory Considerations
BFC, on a parent company only basis, has committed that it will not, without the prior written
non-objection of the OTS:
(i) | incur, issue, renew or roll over any current lines of credit, guarantee the debt of any other entity or otherwise incur any additional debt, except as contemplated by BFCs business plan or in connection with BankAtlantics compliance requirements applicable to it; | ||
(ii) | declare or make any dividends or other capital distributions other than dividends payable on BFCs currently outstanding preferred stock of approximately $187,500 a quarter; or | ||
(iii) | enter into any new agreements, contracts or arrangements or materially modify any existing agreements, contracts or arrangements with BankAtlantic not consistent with past practices. |
As described below, BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic each entered into Cease and Desist
Orders with the OTS during February 2011. (See BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic Regulatory
Considerations below for a discussion regarding the terms of the Cease and Desist Orders.) Based
on its ownership interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC may in the future be required to enter into
a Cease and Desist Order with the OTS addressing its ownership and oversight of those companies.
Woodbridge
The development activities at Carolina Oak which is within Tradition Hilton Head, were
suspended in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of, among other things, an overall softening of
demand for new homes and a decline in the overall economy. In 2009, the housing industry continued
to face significant challenges and Woodbridge made the decision to cease all activities at Carolina
Oak. Woodbridge was the obligor under a $37.2 million loan that was collateralized by the Carolina
Oak property. During November 2009, the lender filed an action against Woodbridge and Carolina Oak
alleging default under a promissory note and breach of a guaranty related to the loan. During
December 2009, the OTS closed the lender and appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(the FDIC) as receiver. The FDIC subsequently sold the loan to an investor group. Effective April
26, 2011, Woodbridge and Carolina Oak entered into a settlement agreement with the investor group
to resolve the disputes and litigation between them. Under the terms and conditions of the
settlement agreement, (i) Woodbridge paid $2.5 million to the investor group, (ii) Carolina Oak
conveyed to the investor group the real property securing the loan and (iii) the investor group
agreed not to pursue certain remedies, including a deficiency judgment, and after the expiration of
an agreed-upon time, to fully release Woodbridge and Carolina Oak, in each case subject to certain
conditions. At March 31, 2011, the carrying amount of Carolina Oaks inventory was approximately
$10.8 million.
On September 21, 2009, BFC consummated its merger with Woodbridge pursuant to which Woodbridge
merged with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC. Under Florida law, holders of Woodbridges
Class A
Common Stock who did not vote to approve our merger with Woodbridge and who properly asserted
and exercised
14
Table of Contents
their appraisal rights with respect to their shares (Dissenting Holders) are
entitled to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to the fair value of their shares (as
determined in accordance with the provisions of Florida law) in lieu of the shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock which they would otherwise have been entitled to receive. Dissenting Holders, who
owned in the aggregate approximately 4.6 million shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock,
provided written notice to Woodbridge regarding their intent to exercise their appraisal rights. In
accordance with Florida law, Woodbridge provided written notices and required forms to the
Dissenting Holders setting forth, among other things, its determination that the fair value of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock immediately prior to the effectiveness of the merger was $1.10
per share. Dissenting Holders were required to return their appraisal forms by November 10, 2009
and indicate on their appraisal forms whether the Dissenting Holder chose to (i) accept
Woodbridges offer of $1.10 per share or (ii) demand payment of the fair value estimate determined
by the Dissenting Holder plus interest. One Dissenting Holder, which held approximately 400,000
shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, has withdrawn its shares from the appraisal rights
process, while the remaining Dissenting Holders, who collectively held approximately 4.2 million
shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, have rejected Woodbridges offer of $1.10 per share
and requested payment for their shares based on their respective fair value estimates of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. In December 2009, the Company recorded a $4.6 million liability
with a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in capital representing, in the aggregate,
Woodbridges offer to the Dissenting Holders. The appraisal rights litigation thereafter commenced
and is currently ongoing. The outcome of the litigation is uncertain and there is no assurance as
to the amount of cash that will be required to be paid to the Dissenting Holders, which amount may
be greater than the $4.6 million that we have accrued.
Core Communities
Historically, the activities of Core Communities focused on the development of a
master-planned community in Port St. Lucie, Florida called Tradition, Florida and a community
outside of Hardeeville, South Carolina called Tradition Hilton Head. Until 2009, Tradition,
Florida was in active development as was Tradition Hilton Head, although in a much earlier stage.
During 2010, demand for residential and commercial inventory showed no signs of recovery,
particularly in the geographic regions where Cores properties were located. In early 2010,
Woodbridge made the decision to pursue an orderly liquidation of Core and worked cooperatively with
the various lenders to achieve that objective. During November 2010, Core entered into a
settlement agreement with one of its lenders, which had previously commenced actions seeking
foreclosure of mortgage loans totaling approximately $113.9 million collateralized by property in
Florida and South Carolina. Under the terms of the agreement, Core pledged additional collateral to
the lender consisting of membership interests in five of Cores subsidiaries and granted security
interests in the acreage owned by such subsidiaries in Port St. Lucie, Florida, substantially all
of which is undeveloped raw land. Core also agreed to an amendment of the complaint related to the
Florida foreclosure action to include this additional collateral and an entry into consensual
judgments of foreclosure in both the Florida and South Carolina foreclosure actions. In
consideration therefore, the lender agreed not to enforce a deficiency judgment against Core and,
in February 2011, released Core from any other claims arising from or relating to the loans. As of
November 30, 2010, Core deconsolidated the five subsidiaries, the membership interests in which
were transferred to the lender upon entry into the consensual judgments of foreclosure. In
connection therewith, and in accordance with the accounting guidance for consolidation, the Company
recorded a guarantee obligation deferred gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary of $11.3
million in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2010.
Core received its general release of liability, and accordingly the deferred gain on settlement of
investment in subsidiary was recognized into income, during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
In December 2010, Core and one of its subsidiaries entered agreements, including without
limitation, a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreement, with one of their lenders which resolved the
foreclosure proceedings commenced by the lender related to property at Tradition Hilton Head which
served as collateral for a $25 million loan. Pursuant to the agreements, Cores subsidiary
transferred to the lender all of its right, title and interest in and to the property which served
as collateral for the loan as well as certain additional real and personal property. In
consideration therefore, the lender released Core and its subsidiary from any claims arising from
or relating to the loan. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, this transaction was
accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring and accordingly, a $13.0 million gain on debt
extinguishment was recognized in December 2010.
15
Table of Contents
BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic
Regulatory Considerations
On February 23, 2011, the BankAtlantic Bancorp at its parent company level (BankAtlantic
Bancorp Parent Company) and BankAtlantic, each entered into a Stipulation and Consent to Issuance
of Order to Cease and Desist with the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), BankAtlantic Bancorp
Parent Companys and BankAtlantics primary regulator. The Order to Cease and Desist to which
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company is subject is referred to as the Company Order, the Order to
Cease and Desist to which BankAtlantic is subject is referred to as the Bank Order and the
Company Order and Bank Order are referred to collectively as the Orders. The OTS issued the
Orders due to BankAtlantic Bancorps losses over the past three years, high levels of classified
assets and inadequate levels of capital based on BankAtlantics risk profile as determined by the
OTSs recent examination. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company submitted updated written plans to
the OTS that address, among other things, how BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company intends to
maintain and enhance its and BankAtlantics capital and set forth BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent
Companys business plan for the year ending December 31, 2011. In addition, under the terms of the
Company Order, BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company is prohibited from taking certain actions
without receiving the prior written non-objection of the OTS, including, without limitation,
declaring or paying any dividends or other capital distributions and incurring certain
indebtedness. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company is also required to ensure BankAtlantics
compliance with the terms of the Bank Order as well as all applicable laws, rules, regulations and
agency guidance.
Pursuant to the terms of the Bank Order, BankAtlantic is required to attain by June 30, 2011
and maintain a tier 1 (core) capital ratio equal to or greater than 8% and a total risk-based
capital ratio equal to or greater than 14%. At March 31, 2011, BankAtlantic had a tier 1 (core)
capital ratio of 5.97% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 11.77%. Under the terms of the Bank
Order, BankAtlantic has revised certain of its plans, programs and policies and submitted to the
OTS certain written plans, including a capital plan, a revised business plan and a plan to reduce
BankAtlantics delinquent loans and non-performing assets. If BankAtlantic fails to comply with the
capital plan and/or fails to attain and maintain the increased capital ratio requirements, or upon
any written request from the OTS, BankAtlantic is required to submit a contingency plan, which must
detail actions which BankAtlantic would, in its case, take to either merge with or be acquired by
another banking institution. BankAtlantic will not be required to implement such contingency plan
until such time as it receives written notification from the OTS to do so. In addition, the Bank
Order requires BankAtlantic to limit its asset growth and restricts BankAtlantic from originating
or purchasing new commercial real estate loans or entering into certain material agreements, in
each case without receiving the prior written non-objection of the OTS. Separately, the OTS has
confirmed that it has no objection to BankAtlantic originating loans to facilitate the sale of
certain assets or the renewal, extension or modification of existing commercial real estate loans,
subject in each case to compliance with applicable regulations and bank policies. The Bank Order
prohibits the payment of dividends and other distributions without the prior written non-objection
of the OTS. The Orders also include certain restrictions on compensation paid to the senior
executive officers of BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and BankAtlantic, and restrictions on
agreements with affiliates.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and BankAtlantic will seek to meet the higher capital
requirements of the Bank Order through the estimated financial impact upon consummation of the
proposed sale to PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. of BankAtlantics Tampa branch network
anticipated to close in June 2011, subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory
requirements, and through other efforts that may include the issuance of BankAtlantic Bancorps
Class A Common Stock through a public or private offering, and specifically through the rights
offering to BankAtlantic Bancorps shareholders announced on May 2, 2011. BankAtlantic is also
pursuing other initiatives to improve its regulatory capital position including: operating
strategies to increase revenues and to reduce non-interest expenses, asset balances and
non-performing loans. There can be no assurance that BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company or
BankAtlantic will be able to execute these or other strategies in order to meet and maintain
BankAtlantics new minimum regulatory capital levels by the required time frames.
Each Order became effective on February 23, 2011 and will remain in effect until terminated,
modified or suspended by the OTS. No fines or penalties were imposed in connection with either
Order. While the Orders formalize steps that BankAtlantic Bancorp believes are already underway, if
there is any material failure by BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company or BankAtlantic to comply with
the terms of the Orders, or if unanticipated market factors emerge, and/or if BankAtlantic Bancorp
is unable to raise required additional capital, successfully execute its plans, or comply with
other regulatory requirements, then the OTS could take further action, which could
16
Table of Contents
include the imposition of fines and/or additional enforcement actions. Enforcement actions
broadly available to regulators include the issuance of a capital directive, removal of officers
and/or directors, institution of proceedings for receivership or conservatorship, and termination
of deposit insurance. Any such action would have a material adverse effect on BankAtlantic
Bancorps business, results of operations and financial position.
Liquidity Considerations
Both BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and BankAtlantic actively manage liquidity and cash
flow needs. BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company had cash of $13.1 million as of March 31, 2011.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company does not have debt maturing until March 2032 and has the
ability to defer interest payments on its junior subordinated debentures until December 2013;
however, based on current interest rates, accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $73.1
million would be due in December 2013 if interest is deferred until that date. BankAtlantic Bancorp
Parent Companys operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $6.4 million and $1.0
million during the three months ended March 31, 2011. BankAtlantics liquidity is dependent, in
part, on its ability to maintain or increase deposit levels and the availability of its lines of
credit borrowings with the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), as well as the Treasury and Federal
Reserve lending programs.
As of March 31, 2011, BankAtlantic had $760 million of cash and short-term investments and
approximately $920 million of available unused borrowings, consisting of $589 million of unused
FHLB line of credit capacity, $297 million of unpledged securities, and $34 million of available
borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve. However, such available borrowings are subject to
regular reviews and may be terminated, suspended or reduced at any time at the discretion of the
issuing institution or based on the availability of qualifying collateral. Additionally, interest
rate changes, additional collateral requirements, disruptions in the capital markets, adverse
litigation or regulatory actions, or deterioration in BankAtlantics financial condition may reduce
the amounts it is able to borrow, make borrowings unavailable or make terms of the borrowings and
deposits less favorable. As a result, BankAtlantics cost of funds could increase and the
availability of funding sources could decrease. Based on current and expected liquidity needs and
sources, BankAtlantic Bancorp expects to be able to meet its obligations at least through March 31,
2012.
3. Bluegreen Share Acquisition
As described above, on November 16, 2009, we purchased approximately 7.4 million shares of the
common stock of Bluegreen for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $23 million, increasing
our interest from 9.5 million shares, or 29%, of Bluegreens common stock to 16.9 million shares,
or 52%, of Bluegreens common stock. As a result, we hold a controlling interest in Bluegreen and,
under GAAP, consolidate Bluegreen and all of Bluegreens consolidated entities into our financial
statements. The operating results of Bluegreen are included in the Companys Bluegreen Resorts and
Bluegreen Communities segments.
See Revisions to Consolidated Financial Statements under Note 1 above for a discussion
regarding adjustments made to our previously reported financial statements resulting from our
finalization during the fourth quarter of 2010 of our valuation of Bluegreens assets and
liabilities as of the November 16, 2009 share acquisition date.
17
Table of Contents
4. Discontinued Operations
In December 2009, Core Communities reinitiated efforts to sell two of its commercial leasing
projects (sometimes referred to herein as the Projects) and began soliciting bids from several
potential buyers to purchase assets associated with the Projects. Accordingly, the results of
operations for the Projects are included in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 as discontinued operations. On June 10, 2010, Core sold the
Projects to Inland Real Estate Acquisition, Inc. (Inland) for approximately $75.4 million. As a
result of the sale, Core realized a gain on sale of discontinued operations of approximately $2.6
million in the second quarter of 2010. In connection with the sale, the outstanding balance of the
loans related to the assets held for sale was reduced to approximately $800,000 as a result of
negotiations with the lender. Core used the proceeds from the sale to repay these loans. As a
result, Core was released from its obligations to the lender with respect to the loans.
The following table summarizes the results of operations for the Projects during the three
months ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
March 31, | ||||
2010 | ||||
Revenue and other income |
$ | 1,834 | ||
Costs and expenses |
2,083 | |||
Loss before income taxes |
(249 | ) | ||
Benefit for income taxes |
| |||
Loss from discontinued operations |
$ | (249 | ) | |
5. Assets Held for Sale
In August 2010, BankAtlantic announced that, due to the rapidly changing environment in
Florida and the banking industry, it decided to focus on its core markets in South Florida and
BankAtlantic began seeking a buyer for its 19 branches located in the Tampa, Florida area. In
January 2011, BankAtlantic agreed to sell its 19 branches and 2 related facilities in the Tampa
area and the associated deposits to an unrelated financial institution. The purchasing financial
institution has agreed to pay i) a 10% premium for the deposits plus ii) the net book value of the
acquired real estate and substantially all of the fixed assets associated with the branches and
facilities. The purchasing financial institution and BankAtlantic have each received regulatory
approval for the transaction. The transaction is anticipated to close during June 2011, subject to
customary closing conditions and regulatory requirements.
The assets and liabilities associated with the Tampa branches were as follows (in thousands):
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 6,184 | 5,850 | |||||
Office properties and equipment |
30,725 | 31,484 | ||||||
Total assets held for sale |
$ | 36,909 | 37,334 | |||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Interest bearing deposits |
$ | 294,746 | 255,630 | |||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
95,686 | 85,516 | ||||||
Total deposits |
390,432 | 341,146 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
79 | 87 | ||||||
Total liabilities held for sale |
$ | 390,511 | 341,233 | |||||
18
Table of Contents
6. Fair Value Measurement
The following tables present major categories of the Companys assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
March 31, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Description | 2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 103,790 | | 103,790 | | |||||||||||
REMICS (1) |
59,254 | | 59,254 | | ||||||||||||
Agency bonds |
60,166 | | 60,166 | | ||||||||||||
Municipal bonds |
133,918 | | 133,918 | | ||||||||||||
Taxable securities |
17,620 | | 17,620 | | ||||||||||||
Benihana Convertible
Preferred Stock |
20,951 | | | 20,951 | ||||||||||||
Other equity securities |
18,800 | 18,800 | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 414,499 | 18,800 | 374,748 | 20,951 | |||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
December 31, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Description | 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 112,042 | | 112,042 | | |||||||||||
REMICS(1) |
68,841 | | 68,841 | | ||||||||||||
Agency bonds |
60,143 | | 60,143 | | ||||||||||||
Municipal bonds |
162,123 | | 162,123 | | ||||||||||||
Taxable securities |
19,922 | | 19,922 | | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency put options |
24 | 24 | | | ||||||||||||
Benihana Convertible
Preferred Stock |
21,106 | | | 21,106 | ||||||||||||
Other equity securities |
20,819 | 20,819 | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 465,020 | 20,843 | 423,071 | 21,106 | |||||||||||
(1) | Real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICS) are pass-through entities that hold residential loans. Investors in these entities are issued ownership interests in the entities in the form of a bond. The securities were issued by government agencies. |
There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the Companys
financial statements at March 31, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
19
Table of Contents
The following table presents major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (in
thousands):
Benihana | ||||
Convertible | ||||
Preferred Stock | ||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 21,106 | ||
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized) |
||||
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets) |
| |||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
| |||
Included in other comprehensive
loss |
(155 | ) | ||
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
| |||
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
| |||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
$ | 20,951 | ||
The following table presents major categories of assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March
31, 2010 (in thousands):
Retained | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interests in | Benihana | |||||||||||||||||||
Notes | Convertible | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||
Receivable Sold | Bonds | Preferred Stock | Securities | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 26,340 | 250 | 17,766 | | 44,356 | ||||||||||||||
Total gains and losses
(realized/unrealized) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
(26,340 | ) | | | | (26,340 | ) | |||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive
income |
| | 2,481 | | 2,481 | |||||||||||||||
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
$ | | 250 | 20,247 | | 20,497 | ||||||||||||||
The valuation techniques and the inputs used in our financial statements to measure the
fair value of our recurring financial instruments are described below.
The fair values of agency bonds, municipal bonds, taxable bonds, mortgage-backed securities
and REMICs are estimated using independent pricing sources and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing uses
a market approach valuation technique and Level 2 valuation inputs as quoted market prices are not
available for the specific securities that BankAtlantic Bancorp owns. The independent pricing
sources value these securities using observable market inputs including: benchmark yields,
reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads and other reference data in the secondary
institutional market which is the principal market for these types of assets. To validate fair
values obtained from the pricing sources, BankAtlantic Bancorp reviews fair value estimates
obtained from brokers, investment advisors and others to determine the reasonableness of the fair
values obtained from independent pricing sources. BankAtlantic Bancorp reviews any price that it
determines may not be reasonable and requires the pricing sources to explain the differences in
fair value or reevaluate its fair value.
Equity securities are generally fair valued using the market approach and quoted market prices
(Level 1) or matrix pricing (Level 2 or Level 3) with inputs obtained from independent pricing
sources, if available. Also non-binding broker quotes are obtained to validate fair values obtained
from matrix pricing. However, certain equity and debt securities in which observable market inputs
cannot be obtained are valued either using the income approach and pricing models that we have
developed or based on observable market data that we adjust based on our judgment of the factors we
believe a market participant would use to value the securities (Level 3).
The fair value of foreign currency put options was obtained using the market approach and
quoted market prices using Level 1 inputs as of December 31, 2010.
20
Table of Contents
The estimated fair value of the Companys investment in Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock
was assessed using the income approach with Level 3 inputs by discounting future cash flows at a
market discount rate combined with the fair value of the shares of Benihanas Common Stock that BFC
would receive upon conversion of its shares of Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock.
The following tables present major categories of assets measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | Significant | Impairment (1) | |||||||||||||||||
As of | for Identical | Other Observable | Unobservable | For the Three | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
Description | 2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | March 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Loans measured for
impairment using the fair value
of the underlying collateral |
$ | 238,540 | | | 238,540 | 14,497 | ||||||||||||||
Impairment of loans held for
sale |
33,664 | | | 33,664 | 4,479 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment of real estate owned |
19,728 | | | 19,728 | 2,323 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 291,932 | | | 291,932 | 21,299 | ||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted prices in | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Active Markets | Significant | Significant | Impairments(1) | |||||||||||||||||
As of | for Identical | Other Observable | Unobservable | For the Three | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
Description | 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | March 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Loans measured for impairment
using the fair value of the
collateral |
$ | 189,832 | | | 189,832 | 21,581 | ||||||||||||||
Impaired real estate owned |
665 | | | 665 | 143 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 190,497 | | | 190,497 | 21,724 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Total impairments represent the amount of loss recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 on assets that were measured at fair value as of those dates. |
There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in the
Companys financial statements.
Loans Receivable Measured For Impairment
Impaired loans are generally valued based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.
BankAtlantic Bancorp primarily uses third party appraisals to assist in measuring non-homogenous
impaired loans. These appraisals generally use the market or income approach valuation technique
and use market observable data to formulate an opinion of the fair value of the loans collateral.
However, the appraiser uses professional judgment in determining the fair value of the collateral
or properties, and we may also adjust these values for changes in market conditions subsequent to
the appraisal date. When current appraisals are not available for certain loans, BankAtlantic
Bancorp uses its judgment on market conditions to adjust the most current appraisal. The sales
prices may reflect prices of sales contracts not closed, and the amount of time required to sell
out the real estate project may be derived from current appraisals of similar projects. As a
consequence, the calculation of the fair value of the collateral uses Level 3 inputs. BankAtlantic
Bancorp generally uses third party broker price opinions or an automated valuation service to
measure the fair value of the collateral for impaired homogenous loans in the establishment of
specific reserves or charge-downs when these loans become 120 days delinquent. These third party
valuations from real estate professionals also use Level 3 inputs in the determination of the fair
values.
21
Table of Contents
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale are valued using an income approach with Level 3 inputs as market quotes
or sale transactions of similar loans are generally not available. The fair value is estimated by
discounting forecasted cash flows using a discount rate that reflects the risks inherent in the
loans held for sale portfolio. For non-performing loans held for sale the forecasted cash flows
are based on the estimated fair value of the collateral less cost to sell adjusted for foreclosure
expenses and other operating expenses of the underlying collateral until foreclosure and sale.
Impaired Real Estate Owned
Real estate is generally valued using third party appraisals or broker price opinions. These
appraisals generally use the market approach valuation technique and use market observable data to
formulate an opinion of the fair value of the properties. However, the appraisers or brokers use
professional judgments in determining the fair value of the properties and we may also adjust these
values for changes in market conditions subsequent to the valuation date. As a consequence of using
appraisals, broker price opinions and adjustments to appraisals, the fair values of the properties
are considered Level 3 inputs.
Financial Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following table presents information for financial instruments at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||||||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 164,845 | 164,845 | 178,868 | 178,868 | |||||||||||
Interest bearing deposits in other banks |
656,424 | 656,424 | 455,538 | 455,538 | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
60,954 | 60,954 | 62,249 | 62,249 | ||||||||||||
Securities available for sale |
414,499 | 414,499 | 465,020 | 465,020 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities |
1,833 | 1,833 | 2,033 | 2,033 | ||||||||||||
Tax certificates |
77,837 | 78,523 | 89,789 | 90,738 | ||||||||||||
Federal home loan bank stock |
43,557 | 43,557 | 43,557 | 43,557 | ||||||||||||
Loans receivable including loans held for sale, net |
2,862,985 | 2,565,616 | 3,039,486 | 2,689,890 | ||||||||||||
Notes receivable |
556,452 | 591,000 | 574,969 | 623,000 | ||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 4,005,006 | 4,009,428 | 3,891,190 | 3,893,807 | |||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
45,000 | 44,994 | 170,000 | 170,038 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and
other short term borrowings |
18,373 | 18,373 | 22,764 | 22,764 | ||||||||||||
Receivable-backed notes payable |
536,407 | 520,039 | 569,214 | 560,728 | ||||||||||||
Notes and mortgage notes payable and other
borrowings |
228,867 | 227,865 | 239,571 | 224,866 | ||||||||||||
Junior subordinated debentures |
465,453 | 249,922 | 461,568 | 220,080 |
Management has made estimates of fair value that it believes to be reasonable. However,
because there is no active market for many of these financial instruments and management has
derived the fair value of the majority of these financial instruments using the income approach
technique with Level 3 unobservable inputs, it is possible that the Company or its subsidiaries may
not receive the estimated value upon sale or disposition of the asset or pay the estimated value
upon disposition of the liability in advance of its scheduled maturity. Management estimates used
in its net present value financial models rely on assumptions and judgments regarding issues where
the outcome is unknown and actual results or values may differ significantly from these estimates.
These fair value estimates do not consider the tax effect that would be associated with the
disposition of the assets or liabilities at their fair value estimates.
22
Table of Contents
Interest bearing deposits in other banks include $43.1 million of certificates of deposit
guaranteed by the FDIC with maturities of less than one year. Due to the FDIC guarantee and the
short-term maturity of these certificates of deposit, the fair value of these deposits approximates
the carrying value.
The fair value of tax certificates was calculated using the income approach with Level 3
inputs. The fair value is based on discounted expected cash flows using discount rates that take
into account the risk of the cash flows of tax certificates relative to alternative investments.
The fair value of FHLB stock is its carrying amount.
Fair values are estimated for BankAtlantic Bancorp loan portfolios with similar financial
characteristics. Loans are segregated by category, and each loan category is further segmented into
fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and non-performing categories.
The fair value of BankAtlantic Bancorps performing loans is calculated by using an income
approach with Level 3 inputs. These fair values are estimated by discounting forecasted cash flows
through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the interest rate
risk inherent in the loan portfolio. The estimate of average maturity is based on BankAtlantics
historical experience with prepayments for each loan classification, modified as required by an
estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions. Management of BankAtlantic
Bancorp assigns a credit risk premium and an illiquidity adjustment to these loans based on risk
grades and delinquency status.
The estimated fair value of notes receivable is based on estimated future cash flows
considering contractual payments and estimates of prepayments and defaults, discounted at a market
rate (the rate at which similar loans with similar maturities would be made to borrowers with
similar credit risk).
As permitted by applicable accounting guidance, the fair value of deposits with no stated
maturity, such as non-interest bearing demand deposits, savings and NOW accounts, and money market
and checking accounts, is shown in the above table at book value. The fair value of certificates of
deposit is based on an income approach with Level 3 inputs. The fair value is calculated by the
discounted value of contractual cash flows with the discount rate estimated using current rates
offered by BankAtlantic for similar remaining maturities.
The fair value of short-term borrowings is calculated using the income approach with Level 2
inputs. Contractual cash flows are discounted based on current interest rates. The carrying value
of these borrowings approximates fair value as maturities are generally less than thirty days.
The fair value of FHLB advances was calculated using the income approach with Level 2 inputs.
The fair value was based on discounted cash flows using rates offered for debt with comparable
terms to maturity and issuer credit standing.
The estimated fair values of notes and mortgage notes payable and other borrowings, including
receivable-backed notes payable, were based upon current rates and spreads a party would pay to
obtain similar borrowings.
In determining the fair value of BankAtlantic Bancorps junior subordinated debentures,
BankAtlantic Bancorp used NASDAQ price quotes available with respect to its $69.0 million of
publicly traded trust preferred securities related to its junior subordinated debentures (public
debentures). However, $257.0 million of the outstanding trust preferred securities related to its
junior subordinated debentures are not traded, but are privately held in pools (private
debentures) and with no trading markets, sales history, liquidity or readily determinable source
for valuation. BankAtlantic Bancorp has deferred the payment of interest with respect to all of its
junior subordinated debentures as permitted by the terms of these securities. Based on the deferral
status and the lack of liquidity and ability of a holder to actively sell such private debentures,
the fair value of these private debentures may be subject to a greater discount to par and have a
lower fair value than indicated by the public debenture price quotes. However, due to their
private nature and the lack of a trading market, fair value of the private debentures was not
readily determinable at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and as a practical alternative,
BankAtlantic Bancorp used the NASDAQ price quotes of the public debentures to value its remaining
outstanding junior subordinated debentures whether privately held or publicly traded.
The estimated fair value of Woodbridges and Bluegreens junior subordinated debentures in the
aggregate amount of $133.6 million and $115.7 million as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively, were
23
Table of Contents
based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows at a market discount rate or market
price quotes from the over-the-counter bond market.
Derivatives
The carrying amount and fair values of BankAtlantics commitments to extend credit, standby
letters of credit, financial guarantees and forward commitments are not considered significant. See
Note 16 for the contractual amounts of BankAtlantics financial instrument commitments.
During the second quarter of 2010, BankAtlantic expanded its cruise ship automated teller
machine (ATM) operations and began dispensing foreign currency from certain ATMs on cruise ships.
At March 31, 2011, BankAtlantic had $7.1 million of foreign currency in cruise ship ATMs and
recognized $0.4 million of foreign currency unrealized exchange gains which were included in other
income in the Companys statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
BankAtlantic purchased foreign currency put options as an economic hedge for the foreign currency
in its cruise ship ATMs. The terms of the put options and the fair value as of March 31, 2011 were
as follows (in thousands, except strike price):
Contract | Expiration | Strike | Fair | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Date | Price | Premium | Value | ||||||||||||||
| 400 | 11-Apr | $ | 1.34 | $ | 31 | | |||||||||||
| 400 | $ | 31 | | ||||||||||||||
Included in Financial Services securities activities, net in the Companys statement of
operations were $24,000 of unrealized losses associated with the above put options for the three
months ended March 31, 2011.
7. Securities Available for Sale
The following tables summarize securities available for sale (in thousands):
As of March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Government agency securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 97,370 | 6,420 | | 103,790 | |||||||||||
Agency bonds |
60,000 | 166 | | 60,166 | ||||||||||||
REMICS |
56,957 | 2,297 | | 59,254 | ||||||||||||
Total |
214,327 | 8,883 | | 223,210 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds |
133,747 | 171 | | 133,918 | ||||||||||||
Other bonds |
17,624 | 8 | 12 | 17,620 | ||||||||||||
Benihana Convertible
Preferred Stock |
16,426 | 4,525 | | 20,951 | ||||||||||||
Equity and other securities |
18,624 | 178 | 2 | 18,800 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
186,421 | 4,882 | 14 | 191,289 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 400,748 | 13,765 | 14 | 414,499 | |||||||||||
24
Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Government agency securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 105,219 | 6,823 | | 112,042 | |||||||||||
Agency bonds |
60,000 | 143 | | 60,143 | ||||||||||||
REMICS |
66,034 | 2,807 | | 68,841 | ||||||||||||
Total |
231,253 | 9,773 | | 241,026 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds |
162,113 | 33 | 23 | 162,123 | ||||||||||||
Other bonds |
19,936 | 8 | 22 | 19,922 | ||||||||||||
Benihana Convertible
Preferred Stock |
16,426 | 4,680 | | 21,106 | ||||||||||||
Equity and other securities |
20,634 | 188 | 3 | 20,819 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
219,109 | 4,909 | 48 | 223,970 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives |
24 | | | 24 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 450,386 | 14,682 | 48 | 465,020 | |||||||||||
The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Companys
securities available for sale with unrealized losses that are deemed temporary, aggregated by
investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position, as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
As of March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Taxable Securities |
$ | 12,767 | 12 | | | 12,767 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
| | 8 | 2 | 8 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total available for
sale securities: |
$ | 12,767 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 12,775 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds |
$ | 90,413 | (23 | ) | | | 90,413 | (23 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Taxable securities |
15,155 | (22 | ) | | | 15,155 | (22 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
| | 7 | (3 | ) | 7 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total available for
sale securities |
$ | 105,568 | (45 | ) | 7 | (3 | ) | 105,575 | (48 | ) | ||||||||||||||
The unrealized losses on municipal bonds and taxable securities outstanding less than 12
months are primarily the result of interest rate changes. BankAtlantic Bancorp expects to receive
cash proceeds for its entire investment upon maturity.
The unrealized loss on equity securities at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were not
significant. Accordingly, the Company did not consider these investments other-than-temporarily
impaired at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
25
Table of Contents
The scheduled maturities of debt securities available for sale were (in thousands):
Debt Securities | ||||||||
Available for Sale | ||||||||
Estimated | ||||||||
Amortized | Fair | |||||||
March 31, 2011 (1) | Cost | Value | ||||||
Due within one year |
$ | 150,113 | 150,272 | |||||
Due after one year, but within five years |
61,347 | 61,524 | ||||||
Due after five years, but within ten years |
19,775 | 20,500 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
134,463 | 142,452 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 365,698 | 374,748 | |||||
(1) | Scheduled maturities in the above table are based on contractual maturities which may vary significantly from actual maturities due to prepayments. |
Included in Financial Services securities activities, net were (in thousands):
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Gross gains on securities sales |
$ | | 3,138 | |||||
Gross losses on securities sales |
24 | | ||||||
Proceed from sales of securities |
| 46,907 | ||||||
BFC Benihana Investment
During 2004, the Company purchased 800,000 shares of Benihana Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock (Convertible Preferred Stock) for $25.00 per share. The Convertible Preferred Stock is
convertible into an aggregate of 1,578,943 shares of Benihanas Common Stock at a conversion price
of $12.67 per share of Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to adjustment from time to time upon
certain defined events. Based on the number of currently outstanding shares of Benihanas capital
stock, the Convertible Preferred Stock, if converted, would represent an approximately 19% voting
interest and an approximately 9% economic interest in Benihana.
Except as provided by Delaware law, the shares of the Convertible Preferred Stock have voting
rights on an as if converted basis together with Benihanas Common Stock on all matters put to a
vote of the holders of Benihanas Common Stock. The approval of a majority of the holders of the
Convertible Preferred Stock then outstanding, voting as a single class, are required for certain
events outside the ordinary course of business. Holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock are
entitled to receive cumulative quarterly dividends at an annual rate equal to $1.25 per share,
payable on the last day of each calendar quarter. The Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to
mandatory redemption at the original issue price of $20 million plus accumulated dividends on July
2, 2014 unless the Company elects to extend the mandatory redemption date to a later date not to
extend beyond July 2, 2024. At March 31, 2011, the closing price of Benihanas Common Stock was
$8.43 per share. The market value of the Convertible Preferred Stock if converted at March 31,
2011 would have been approximately $13.3 million. During July 2010, Benihana announced its
intention to engage in a formal review of strategic alternatives, including a possible sale of the
company. In the event that a sale transaction is consummated at a time when the Company continues
to hold all 800,000 shares of the Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company would receive a minimum
of $20 million in consideration for its shares of the Convertible Preferred Stock.
At March 31, 2011, the Companys estimated fair value of its investment in Benihanas
Convertible Preferred Stock was approximately $21.0 million. The estimated fair value of the
Companys investment in Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock was assessed using the income
approach with Level 3 inputs by discounting future cash flows at a market discount rate combined
with the fair value of the underlying shares of Benihanas Common Stock that the Company would
receive upon conversion of its shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock.
26
Table of Contents
8. Loans Receivable
The consolidated loan portfolio consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Commercial non-real estate |
$ | 132,456 | 135,588 | |||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||
Residential |
115,775 | 133,155 | ||||||
Land |
35,701 | 58,040 | ||||||
Owner occupied |
104,704 | 111,097 | ||||||
Other |
582,724 | 592,538 | ||||||
Small Business: |
| | ||||||
Real estate |
200,394 | 203,479 | ||||||
Non-real estate |
95,822 | 99,190 | ||||||
Consumer: |
| | ||||||
Consumer home equity |
590,771 | 604,228 | ||||||
Consumer other |
15,633 | 16,068 | ||||||
Deposit overdrafts |
3,717 | 3,091 | ||||||
Residential: |
| | ||||||
Residential-interest only |
475,683 | 541,788 | ||||||
Residential-amortizing |
613,167 | 671,948 | ||||||
Total gross loans |
2,966,547 | 3,170,210 | ||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||
Premiums, discounts and net deferred fees |
2,034 | 1,650 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(155,051 | ) | (162,139 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable net |
$ | 2,813,530 | 3,009,721 | |||||
Loans held for sale |
$ | 49,455 | 29,765 | |||||
BankAtlantic Bancorps loans held for sale as of March 31, 2011 consisted of $25.1
million of residential loans transferred from held-for-investment to held-for-sale classification
during the three months ended March 31, 2011, $22.9 million of commercial loans and $1.5 million of
residential loans originated for sale. BankAtlantic Bancorps loans held for sale as of December
31, 2010 consisted of $27.9 million of commercial real estate loans transferred from
held-for-investment to held-for-sale classification during the fourth quarter of 2010 and $1.8
million of residential loans originated for sale. BankAtlantic Bancorp transfers loans to
held-for-sale when, based on the current economic environment and related market conditions, it
does not have the intent to hold those loans for the foreseeable future. BankAtlantic Bancorp
recognized a $64,000 loss on the sale of loans held for sale for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and a $54,000 gain on the sale of loans held for sale during the three months ended March 31,
2010.
The recorded investment (recorded investment represents unpaid principal balance less charge
downs and deferred fees) of non-accrual loans receivable and loans held for sale was (in
thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
Loan Class | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Commercial non-real estate |
$ | 17,384 | 17,659 | |||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||
Residential |
87,343 | 95,482 | ||||||
Land |
20,157 | 27,260 | ||||||
Owner occupied |
7,334 | 4,870 | ||||||
Other |
134,788 | 128,658 | ||||||
Small business: |
||||||||
Real estate |
9,841 | 8,928 | ||||||
Non-real estate |
2,331 | 1,951 | ||||||
Consumer |
13,231 | 14,120 | ||||||
Residential: |
||||||||
Residential-interest only |
37,463 | 38,900 | ||||||
Residential-amortizing |
44,092 | 47,639 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 373,964 | 385,467 | |||||
An analysis of the age of the recorded investment in loans receivable and loans held for
sale as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 that were past due were as follows (in
thousands):
27
Table of Contents
31-59 Days | 60-89 Days | 90 Days | Total | Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Past Due | Past Due | or More | Past Due | Current | Receivable (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial non-real
estate |
$ | 21,779 | | 13,373 | 35,152 | 97,304 | 132,456 | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial real
estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
1,961 | | 51,423 | 53,384 | 67,304 | 120,688 | ||||||||||||||||||
Land |
| 303 | 16,413 | 16,716 | 28,072 | 44,788 | ||||||||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
866 | | 3,861 | 4,727 | 101,458 | 106,185 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
9,417 | 2,451 | 53,197 | 65,065 | 527,112 | 592,177 | ||||||||||||||||||
Small business: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
1,932 | 1,632 | 6,618 | 10,182 | 190,212 | 200,394 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-real estate |
17 | 425 | | 442 | 95,380 | 95,822 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
6,645 | 5,332 | 13,234 | 25,211 | 584,910 | 610,121 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential-interest
only |
3,633 | 5,649 | 37,249 | 46,531 | 447,533 | 494,064 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential-amortizing |
6,899 | 4,669 | 43,702 | 55,270 | 573,970 | 629,240 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 53,149 | 20,461 | 239,070 | 312,680 | 2,713,256 | 3,025,935 | |||||||||||||||||
(1) | Total loans receivable exclude purchase accounting of $7.9 million in connection with BFCs share acquisitions of BankAtlantic Bancorp in 2008. The 2008 share acquisitions were accounted for as step acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting then in effect. |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
31-59 Days | 60-89 Days | 90 Days | Total | Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | Past Due | Past Due | or More (1) | Past Due | Current | Receivable (2) | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial non-real
estate |
$ | | | 13,498 | 13,498 | 122,090 | 135,588 | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
4,700 | | 53,791 | 58,491 | 84,325 | 142,816 | ||||||||||||||||||
Land |
| | 23,803 | 23,803 | 34,237 | 58,040 | ||||||||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
| | 3,862 | 3,862 | 107,235 | 111,097 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 6,043 | 54,940 | 60,983 | 551,472 | 612,455 | ||||||||||||||||||
Small business: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
1,530 | 2,059 | 6,670 | 10,259 | 193,220 | 203,479 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-real estate |
| 67 | 25 | 92 | 99,098 | 99,190 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
6,396 | 6,009 | 14,120 | 26,525 | 596,862 | 623,387 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest only |
4,907 | 6,164 | 38,900 | 49,971 | 500,275 | 550,246 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortizing |
6,091 | 5,926 | 47,487 | 59,504 | 614,281 | 673,785 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 23,624 | 26,268 | 257,096 | 306,988 | 2,903,095 | 3,210,083 | |||||||||||||||||
(1) | BankAtlantic Bancorp had no loans greater than 90 days and accruing. | |
(2) | Total loans receivable exclude purchase accounting of $8.5 million in connection with BFCs share acquisitions of BankAtlantic Bancorp in 2008. The 2008 share acquisitions were accounted for as step acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting then in effect. |
28
Table of Contents
The activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | Real | Small | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Real Estate | Estate | Business | Consumer | Residential | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 10,786 | 83,859 | 11,514 | 32,043 | 23,937 | 162,139 | |||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs: |
(464 | ) | (11,277 | ) | (2,611 | ) | (7,814 | ) | (8,011 | ) | (30,177 | ) | ||||||||||||
Recoveries : |
791 | 718 | 310 | 408 | 131 | 2,358 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision : |
(405 | ) | 7,232 | 912 | 2,874 | 17,199 | 27,812 | |||||||||||||||||
Transfer to held for sale: |
| (1,390 | ) | | | (5,691 | ) | (7,081 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 10,708 | 79,142 | 10,125 | 27,511 | 27,565 | 155,051 | |||||||||||||||||
Ending balance individually
evaluated for impairment |
$ | 9,024 | 59,274 | 1,565 | 1,453 | 7,369 | 78,685 | |||||||||||||||||
Ending balance collectively
evaluated for impairment |
1,684 | 19,868 | 8,560 | 26,058 | 20,196 | 76,366 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 10,708 | 79,142 | 10,125 | 27,511 | 27,565 | 155,051 | |||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance individually
evaluated for impairment |
$ | 16,495 | 343,809 | 10,562 | 24,033 | 84,667 | 479,566 | |||||||||||||||||
Ending balance collectively
evaluated for impairment |
$ | 115,961 | 520,029 | 285,654 | 586,088 | 1,038,637 | 2,546,369 | |||||||||||||||||
Total (1) |
$ | 132,456 | 863,838 | 296,216 | 610,121 | 1,123,304 | 3,025,935 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchases of loans |
$ | | | | | 3,864 | 3,864 | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from loan sales |
$ | | 3,100 | | | 7,618 | 10,718 | |||||||||||||||||
Transfer to held for sale |
$ | | 2,450 | | | 25,072 | 27,522 | |||||||||||||||||
(1) | Total loans receivable exclude purchase accounting of $7.9 million in connection with BFCs share acquisitions of BankAtlantic Bancorp in 2008. The 2008 share acquisitions were accounted for as step acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting then in effect. |
Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was
as follows (in thousands):
For The Three | ||||
Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2010 | ||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 187,218 | ||
Loans charged-off |
(41,423 | ) | ||
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off |
1,047 | |||
Net charge-offs |
(40,376 | ) | ||
Provision for loan losses |
30,755 | |||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 177,597 | ||
Impaired Loans Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, the
Company believes it is probable that it will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. For a loan that has been restructured, the contractual
terms of the loan agreement refer to the contractual terms specified by the original loan
agreement, not the contractual terms specified by the restructured agreement. Impairment is
evaluated based on past due status for consumer and residential loans. Impairment is evaluated
based on BankAtlantic Bancorps on-going credit monitoring process for commercial and small
business loans which results in the evaluation for impairment of all criticized loans. Factors
considered in determining if a loan is impaired are past payment history, strength of the borrower
or guarantors, and cash flow associated with the collateral or business. If a loan is impaired, a
specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, based on the
29
Table of Contents
present value of estimated future cash flows using the loans existing interest rate or at the fair
value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. BankAtlantic generally measures loans for
impairment using the fair value of collateral less cost to sell method. Interest payments on
impaired loans for all loan classes are recognized on a cash basis, unless collectability of the
principal and interest amount is probable, in which case interest is recognized on an accrual
basis. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible. Impaired
loans held for sale are measured for impairment based on the estimated fair value of the collateral
less cost to sell adjusted for foreclosure expenses and other operating expenses of the underlying
collateral until foreclosure and sale.
Impaired loans as of March 31, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):
Unpaid | Average | Interest | ||||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Principal | Related | Recorded | Income | ||||||||||||||||
Investment | Balance | Allowance | Investment | Recognized | ||||||||||||||||
With an allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial non-real estate |
$ | 15,106 | 15,106 | 9,024 | 15,958 | 16 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
93,919 | 126,982 | 21,299 | 87,825 | 435 | |||||||||||||||
Land |
5,428 | 5,428 | 1,652 | 10,319 | 42 | |||||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
4,165 | 4,165 | 667 | 2,930 | | |||||||||||||||
Other |
114,736 | 118,006 | 35,657 | 105,215 | 404 | |||||||||||||||
Small business: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
7,982 | 7,982 | 269 | 5,292 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
Non-real estate |
1,948 | 1,948 | 1,296 | 1,864 | 17 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer |
17,248 | 18,286 | 1,453 | 10,489 | | |||||||||||||||
Residential: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential-interest only |
17,458 | 22,376 | 4,097 | 24,632 | | |||||||||||||||
Residential-amortizing |
15,802 | 19,177 | 3,272 | 20,211 | | |||||||||||||||
Total with allowance recorded |
$ | 293,792 | 339,456 | 78,686 | 284,735 | 928 | ||||||||||||||
With no related allowance
recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial non-real estate |
$ | 2,925 | 2,925 | | 2,211 | 7 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
24,416 | 58,741 | | 34,626 | 91 | |||||||||||||||
Land |
16,716 | 51,431 | | 15,378 | | |||||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
3,916 | 3,916 | | 3,919 | 36 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
79,167 | 93,372 | | 80,269 | 614 | |||||||||||||||
Small business: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
9,461 | 11,026 | | 12,594 | 148 | |||||||||||||||
Non-real estate |
805 | 971 | | 489 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer |
9,326 | 12,791 | | 16,178 | 111 | |||||||||||||||
Residential: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential-interest only |
20,339 | 32,282 | | 13,883 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
Residential-amortizing |
31,425 | 42,450 | | 28,544 | 34 | |||||||||||||||
Total with no allowance recorded |
$ | 198,496 | 309,905 | | 208,091 | 1,059 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial non-real estate |
$ | 18,031 | 18,031 | 9,024 | 18,169 | 23 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
342,463 | 462,041 | 59,275 | 340,481 | 1,622 | |||||||||||||||
Small business |
20,196 | 21,927 | 1,565 | 20,239 | 193 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer |
26,574 | 31,077 | 1,453 | 26,667 | 111 | |||||||||||||||
Residential |
85,024 | 116,285 | 7,369 | 87,270 | 38 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 492,288 | 649,361 | 78,686 | 492,826 | 1,987 | ||||||||||||||
30
Table of Contents
Impaired loans as of December 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
Unpaid | Average | Interest | ||||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Principal | Related | Recorded | Income | ||||||||||||||||
Investment | Balance | Allowance | Investment | Recognized | ||||||||||||||||
With a related allowance recorded : |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial non-real estate |
$ | 16,809 | 16,809 | 9,850 | 14,850 | | ||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
81,731 | 87,739 | 21,298 | 86,868 | 778 | |||||||||||||||
Land |
15,209 | 15,209 | 8,156 | 21,010 | 18 | |||||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
1,695 | 1,695 | 335 | 5,366 | | |||||||||||||||
Other |
95,693 | 96,873 | 33,197 | 96,800 | | |||||||||||||||
Small business: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
2,602 | 2,602 | 1,733 | 2,838 | 21 | |||||||||||||||
Non-real estate |
1,779 | 1,779 | 1,203 | 2,015 | | |||||||||||||||
Consumer |
3,729 | 5,029 | 1,791 | 4,665 | | |||||||||||||||
Residential: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential-interest only |
31,805 | 39,451 | 6,741 | 24,327 | 17 | |||||||||||||||
Residential-amortizing |
24,619 | 28,712 | 5,293 | 16,525 | 34 | |||||||||||||||
Total with a related allowance recorded |
$ | 275,671 | 295,898 | 89,597 | 275,264 | 868 | ||||||||||||||
With no related allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial non-real estate |
$ | 1,497 | 1,497 | | 4,799 | 15 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
44,835 | 116,092 | | 42,295 | 267 | |||||||||||||||
Land |
14,039 | 43,846 | | 25,847 | 19 | |||||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
3,922 | 3,922 | | 3,878 | 56 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
81,370 | 97,203 | | 55,311 | 1,446 | |||||||||||||||
Small business: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
15,727 | 16,499 | | 14,722 | 673 | |||||||||||||||
Non-real estate |
172 | 197 | | 358 | | |||||||||||||||
Consumer |
23,029 | 27,146 | | 22,487 | 624 | |||||||||||||||
Residential: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential-interest only |
7,427 | 10,078 | | 16,694 | | |||||||||||||||
Residential-amortizing |
25,664 | 31,797 | | 26,950 | 116 | |||||||||||||||
Total with no related allowance
recorded |
$ | 217,682 | 348,277 | | 213,341 | 3,216 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial non-real estate |
$ | 18,306 | 18,306 | 9,850 | 19,649 | 15 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
338,494 | 462,579 | 62,986 | 337,375 | 2,584 | |||||||||||||||
Small business |
20,280 | 21,077 | 2,936 | 19,933 | 694 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer |
26,758 | 32,175 | 1,791 | 27,152 | 624 | |||||||||||||||
Residential |
89,515 | 110,038 | 12,034 | 84,496 | 167 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 493,353 | 644,175 | 89,597 | 488,605 | 4,084 | ||||||||||||||
Impaired loans without specific valuation allowances represent loans that were
written-down to the fair value of the collateral less cost to sell, loans in which the collateral
value less cost to sell was greater than the carrying value of the loan, loans in which the present
value of the cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate was equal to or greater
than the carrying value of the loan, or large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are
collectively measured for impairment.
BankAtlantic Bancorp monitors collateral dependent loans and performs an impairment analysis
on these loans quarterly. Generally, a full appraisal is obtained when a real estate loan is
evaluated for impairment and an updated full appraisal is obtained within one year from the prior
appraisal date, or earlier if management deems it appropriate based on significant changes in
market conditions. In instances where a property is in the process of foreclosure, an updated
appraisal may be postponed beyond one year, as an appraisal is required on the date of foreclosure;
however, such loans are subject to quarterly impairment analyses. Included in total impaired loans
as of March 31, 2011 was $299.6 million of collateral dependent loans, of which $162.0 million were
measured for impairment using current appraisals and $137.6 million were measured by adjusting
appraisals greater than six months old, as appropriate, to reflect changes in market conditions
subsequent to the last appraisal date. Appraised values were adjusted down by an aggregate amount
of $18.3 million to reflect current market conditions with respect to 36 loans which did not have
current appraisals due to estimated property value declines since the last appraisal dates.
31
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2011, impaired loans with specific valuation allowances had been previously
written down by $47.8 million and impaired loans without specific valuation allowances had been
previously written down by $92.7 million. BankAtlantic had commitments to lend $13.4 million of
additional funds on impaired loans as of March 31, 2011.
Credit Quality Information
Management of BankAtlantic Bancorp monitors net charge-offs levels of classified loans,
impaired loans and general economic conditions nationwide and in Florida in an effort to assess
loan credit quality. BankAtlantic Bancorp uses a risk grading matrix to monitor credit quality for
commercial and small business loans. Risk grades are assigned to each commercial and small
business loan upon origination. The loan officers monitor the risk grades and these risk grades
are reviewed periodically by a third party consultant. BankAtlantic Bancorp assigns risk grades on
a scale of 1 to 13. A general description of the risk grades is as follows:
Grades 1 to 7 The loans in these risk grades are generally well protected by the current
net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or guarantors or by the fair value, less cost to
sell, of the underlying collateral.
Grades 8 to 9 Not used
Grade 10 These loans are considered to have potential weaknesses that deserve managements
close attention. While these loans do not expose BankAtlantic Bancorp to immediate risk of loss, if
left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects
for the loan.
Grade 11 These loans are considered to be inadequately protected by the current sound net
worth and paying capacity of the borrower or guarantors or by the collateral pledged, if any.
Loans in this grade have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the loan and
there is a distinct possibility that BankAtlantic Bancorp may sustain some credit loss if the
weaknesses are not corrected.
Grade 12 These loans are considered to have all the weaknesses of a Grade 11 with the added
characteristic that the weaknesses make collection of BankAtlantic Bancorps investment in the loan
highly questionable and improbable on the basis of currently known facts, conditions and fair
values of the collateral.
Grade 13 These loans, or portions thereof, are considered uncollectible and of such little
value that continuance on the BankAtlantic Bancorps books as an asset is not warranted without the
establishment of a specific valuation allowance or a charge-off. Such loans are generally charged
down or completely charged off.
The following table presents risk grades for commercial and small business loans as of March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
Commercial | Owner Occupied | Other | Small | Small | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | Commercial | Commercial | Commercial | Commercial | Business | Business | ||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Real Estate | Residential | Land | Real Estate | Real Estate | Real Estate | Non-Real Estate | |||||||||||||||||||||
Grade: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grades 1 to 7 |
$ | 80,374 | 2,353 | 22,190 | 94,569 | 278,162 | 169,250 | 80,864 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grade 10 |
11,743 | 7,441 | | 701 | 124,154 | 3,085 | 3,548 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Grade 11 |
40,339 | 110,894 | 22,598 | 10,915 | 189,861 | 28,059 | 11,410 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 132,456 | 120,688 | 44,788 | 106,185 | 592,177 | 200,394 | 95,822 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | Owner Occupied | Other | Small | Small | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non | Commercial | Commercial | Commercial | Commercial | Business | Business | ||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | Real Estate | Residential | Land | Real Estate | Real Estate | Real Estate | Non-Real Estate | |||||||||||||||||||||
Risk Grade: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grades 1 to 7 |
$ | 81,789 | 16,250 | 27,387 | 101,855 | 314,402 | 169,979 | 84,584 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grade 10 |
12,827 | 7,572 | 956 | 704 | 119,508 | 3,098 | 3,665 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Grade 11 |
40,972 | 118,994 | 29,697 | 8,538 | 178,545 | 30,402 | 10,941 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 135,588 | 142,816 | 58,040 | 111,097 | 612,455 | 203,479 | 99,190 | ||||||||||||||||||||
There were
no loans risk graded 12 or 13 as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010.
32
Table of Contents
BankAtlantic Bancorp monitors the credit quality of residential loans through
loan-to-value ratios of the underlying collateral. Elevated loan-to-value ratios indicate the
likelihood of increased credit losses upon default which results in higher loan portfolio credit
risk.
The loan-to-value ratios of BankAtlantic Bancorps residential loans were as follows (in
thousands):
As Corrected (3) | ||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Residential | Residential | Residential | Residential | |||||||||||||
Loan-to-value ratios (1) | Interest Only | Amortizing | Interest Only | Amortizing | ||||||||||||
Ratios not available (2) |
$ | 50,085 | 178,820 | 59,520 | 185,610 | |||||||||||
=<60% |
41,122 | 127,192 | 47,605 | 145,075 | ||||||||||||
60.1% - 70% |
29,140 | 45,496 | 33,005 | 49,732 | ||||||||||||
70.1% - 80% |
33,881 | 42,833 | 37,808 | 48,586 | ||||||||||||
80.1% - 90% |
42,520 | 43,390 | 47,574 | 47,039 | ||||||||||||
>90.1% |
297,316 | 190,028 | 324,734 | 197,743 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 494,064 | 627,759 | 550,246 | 673,785 | |||||||||||
(1) | Current loan-to-value ratios (LTV) for the majority of the portfolio were obtained as of the first quarter of 2010 based on automated valuation models. | |
(2) | Ratios not available consisted of property addresses not in the automated valuation database, and $77.3 million and $78.0 million as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, of loans originated under the community reinvestment act program that are not monitored based on loan-to-value. | |
(3) | The principal amount of BankAtlantic Bancorps residential loans set forth in the table in Note 10 to the Companys financial statements in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 were incorrectly identified as reflecting loan-to-value ratios obtained as of the first quarter of 2010 when in fact the amounts instead reflected loan-to-value ratios as of the date of loan origination. The above table labeled As Corrected reflects loan-to-value ratios as of December 31, 2010 based on first quarter of 2010 valuations. |
BankAtlantic Bancorp monitors the credit quality of its portfolio of consumer loans
secured by real estate utilizing loan-to-value ratios at origination. BankAtlantic Bancorps
experience indicates that default rates are significantly lower with loans that have lower loan to
value ratios at origination.
The loan-to-value ratio at loan origination of consumer loans secured by real estate were as
follows (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Consumer | Consumer | |||||||
Home | Home | |||||||
Loan-to-value ratios | Equity | Equity | ||||||
<70% |
$ | 359,593 | 363,653 | |||||
70.1% - 80% |
103,181 | 106,180 | ||||||
80.1% - 90% |
69,233 | 72,529 | ||||||
90.1% -100% |
45,957 | 48,537 | ||||||
>100% |
12,807 | 13,329 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 590,771 | 604,228 | |||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp monitors the credit quality of its consumer non-real estate loans
based on loan delinquencies.
33
Table of Contents
9. Notes Receivable
The table below sets forth information relating to Bluegreens notes receivable (in
thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Notes receivable, gross |
$ | 681,960 | 712,145 | |||||
Purchase accounting adjustment |
(39,138 | ) | (43,778 | ) | ||||
Notes receivable, net of discount |
642,822 | 668,367 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(86,370 | ) | (93,398 | ) | ||||
Notes receivable, net |
$ | 556,452 | 574,969 | |||||
Included in the table above are notes acquired through our November 2009 acquisition of
approximately 7.4 million shares giving us a controlling interest in Bluegreen. In accordance with
applicable accounting guidance Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit
Quality, the Company has elected to recognize interest income on these notes receivable using the
expected cash flows method. The Company treated expected prepayments consistently in determining
its cash flows which it anticipates to collect, such that the non-accretable difference is not
affected and the difference between actual prepayments and expected prepayments shall not affect
the non-accretable difference. The assumption for prepayment rates was derived from Bluegreens
historical performance information for its off-balance sheet securitizations and ranges from 4% to
9%. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the outstanding contractual unpaid principal
balance of the acquired notes was $234.9 million and $250.6 million, respectively. As of March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying amount of the acquired notes was $195.8 million and $206.9
million, respectively.
The carrying amount of the acquired notes is included in the balance sheet amounts of notes
receivable at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The following is a reconciliation of accretable
yield as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
Accretable Yield
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 85,906 | 102,665 | |||||
Accretion |
(11,076 | ) | (29,065 | ) | ||||
Reclassification from nonaccretable yield |
8,200 | 12,306 | ||||||
Balance, at end of period |
$ | 83,030 | 85,906 | |||||
All of Bluegreens vacation ownership interests (VOIs) notes receivable, which comprise the
majority of the notes receivable, bear interest at fixed rates. The weighted-average interest rate
charged on loans secured by VOIs was 15.3% and 15.2% at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. The majority of Bluegreens notes receivable secured by home sites bear interest at
variable rates. The weighted-average interest rate charged on notes receivable secured by home
sites was 7.8% at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Bluegreens VOI notes receivable are generally secured by properties located in Florida,
Louisiana, Nevada, New Jersey, Michigan, Missouri, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Virginia, Wisconsin, and Aruba. The majority of Bluegreen Communities notes receivables are secured
by home sites in Georgia, Texas, and Virginia.
Allowance for uncollectible notes receivable
The table below sets forth the activity in the allowance for uncollectible notes receivable
during the three months ended March 31, 2011 (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2010 (a) |
$ | 93,398 | ||
Provision for loan losses |
4,664 | |||
Write-offs of uncollectible receivables |
(11,692 | ) | ||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
$ | 86,370 | ||
(a) | Allowance for uncollectible notes receivable represents the amount attributable to new loan originations subsequent to the date of our acquisition of a controlling interest in Bluegreen (November 16, 2009). |
34
Table of Contents
Bluegreen holds large amounts of homogeneous VOI notes receivable and assesses
uncollectibility based on pools of receivables. In estimating future credit losses, Bluegreen does
not use a single primary indicator of credit quality but instead evaluates its VOI notes based upon
a combination of factors including a static pool analysis, the aging of the respective receivables,
current default trends, prepayment rates by origination year, and the FICO scores of the buyers.
The following table shows the aging of Bluegreens VOI notes receivable as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Current |
$ | 630,834 | 655,304 | |||||
31-60 days |
9,138 | 12,063 | ||||||
61-90 days |
7,216 | 10,228 | ||||||
Over 91 days |
28,403 | 27,785 | ||||||
Purchase accounting adjustment |
(39,138 | ) | (43,778 | ) | ||||
Notes receivable, net of purchase accounting
adjustment |
636,453 | 661,602 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(86,370 | ) | (93,398 | ) | ||||
Notes receivable, net |
$ | 550,083 | 568,204 | |||||
10. Variable Interest Entities Bluegreen
In accordance with the guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities, Bluegreen
analyzes its variable interests, including loans, guarantees, and equity investments, to determine
if an entity in which it has a variable interest is a variable interest entity. Bluegreens
analysis includes both quantitative and qualitative reviews. Bluegreen bases its quantitative
analysis on the forecasted cash flows of the entity, and it bases its qualitative analysis on its
review of the design of the entity, its organizational structure including decision-making ability,
and relevant financial agreements. Bluegreen also uses qualitative analyses to determine if it must
consolidate a variable interest entity as the primary beneficiary.
Bluegreen sells through special purpose finance entities, VOI notes receivable originated by
Bluegreen Resorts. These transactions are generally structured as non-recourse to Bluegreen, with
the exception of one securitization transaction entered into in 2010, which was guaranteed by
Bluegreen. These transactions are generally designed to provide liquidity for Bluegreen and
transfer the economic risks and certain of the benefits of the notes receivable to third parties.
In a securitization, various classes of debt securities are issued by the special purpose finance
entities that are generally collateralized by a single tranche of transferred assets, which consist
of VOI notes receivable. Bluegreen services the notes receivable for a fee. With each
securitization, Bluegreen generally retains a portion of the securities. In accordance with
applicable accounting guidance currently in effect, we consolidate these entities into our
financial statements as we are the primary beneficiary of the entities.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, Bluegreen transferred $5.1 million of VOI notes
receivable to the VIEs and received cash proceeds of $3.6 million. At March 31, 2011, the principal
balance of VOI notes receivable included within the Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial
Condition that are restricted to satisfy obligations of the variable interest entities obligations
totaled $505.5 million. In addition, approximately $38.7 million of restricted cash is held in
accounts for the benefit of the variable interest entities. Further, at March 31, 2011, the
carrying amount of the consolidated liabilities included within the Companys Consolidated
Statement of Financial Condition for these variable interest entities totaled $430.4 million,
comprised of $409.6 million of non-recourse receivable-backed notes payable and $20.8 million of
receivable-backed notes payable which is recourse to Bluegreen.
Under the terms of certain of Bluegreens timeshare note sales, Bluegreen has the right at its
option to repurchase or substitute for a limited amount of defaulted mortgage notes at the
outstanding principal balance plus accrued interest or, in some facilities, at 24% of the original
sale price associated with the VOI which collateralizes the defaulted mortgage note. Voluntary
repurchases or substitutions by Bluegreen of defaulted notes during the three months ended March
31, 2011 and 2010 were $8.1 million and $14.1 million, respectively.
35
Table of Contents
11. Real Estate Inventory
Real estate inventory consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Land and land development costs |
$ | 107,574 | 107,161 | |||||
Bluegreen Resorts |
223,717 | 230,346 | ||||||
Other costs |
461 | 554 | ||||||
Land and facilities held for sale |
5,436 | 5,436 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 337,188 | 343,497 | |||||
Inventory consisted of the combined real estate assets of Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen
Communities, Carolina Oak, Core Communities, BankAtlantics residential construction development
acquired in 2002, and BankAtlantic land and facilities held for sale for BankAtlantics store
expansion program. During the fourth quarter of 2010, Core relinquished to its lenders title to
substantially all of the land Core owned in both Florida and South Carolina and conveyed its
ownership interests in several of its subsidiaries. During February 2011, Core was released from
any other claims arising from or relating to the loans. See Note 2 for additional information. Land
and land development costs include $19.4 million related to certain assets within Cores South
Carolina property which are subject to separate foreclosure proceedings that are not expected to
begin until later in the first half of 2011.
As a result of Bluegreens continued low volume of homesite sales, reduced prices, and the
impact of depressed sales levels on the forecasted sell-out period of its Bluegreen Communities
projects, the Company recorded non-cash charges to cost of real estate sales of approximately $3.0
million, net of purchase accounting adjustments, during the first quarter of 2010, to write-down
the inventory balances of certain phases of Bluegreens Communities properties to their estimated
fair value less costs to sell.
Bluegreens estimates the fair value of the underlying properties based on either the prices
of comparable properties or our analysis of their estimated future cash flows (Level 3 inputs),
discounted at rates commensurate with the risk inherent in the property. Bluegreen estimates future
cash flows based upon its expectations of performance given current and projected forecasts of the
economy and real estate markets in general. Should adverse conditions in the real estate market
continue longer than forecasted or deteriorate further or if Bluegreens performance does not meet
the expectations on which its estimates were based, or if Bluegreen otherwise determines based on
information available that the carrying value of the assets exceed their fair value, additional
charges may be recorded in the future.
12. Debt
Woodbridge
Effective April 26, 2011, Woodbridge and Carolina Oak entered into a settlement agreement with
an investor group to resolve the disputes and litigation between them relating to an approximately
$37.2 million loan which was collateralized by property owned by Carolina Oak. See Note 2 for
additional information regarding the settlement agreement.
Core
During November 2010, Core entered into a settlement agreement with one of its lenders, which
had previously commenced actions seeking foreclosure of mortgage loans totaling approximately
$113.9 million collateralized by property in Florida and South Carolina. In December 2010, Core and
one of its subsidiaries entered agreements, including without limitation, a Deed in Lieu of
Foreclosure Agreement, with one of their lenders which resolved the foreclosure proceedings
commenced by the lender related to property at Tradition Hilton Head which served as collateral for
a $25 million loan. See Note 2 for additional information regarding these settlement agreements.
36
Table of Contents
Approximately $27.2 million of the $113.9 million of mortgage loans described in the first
sentence of the previous paragraph is collateralized by property in South Carolina which had an
estimated carrying value of approximately $19.4 million at March 31, 2011. This property is subject
to separate foreclosure proceedings which are not expected to begin until later in the first half
of 2011. While Core was released by the lender from any other claims relating to the loans, the
applicable accounting guidance requires that the $27.2 million of debt and associated $19.4 million
of collateral remain in Cores financial statements until the foreclosure proceedings have been
completed.
Bluegreen
Bluegreens pledged assets under its facilities and notes payable as of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 had a carrying amount before purchase accounting adjustments of approximately
$131.5 million and $142.1 million, respectively.
Significant changes related to Bluegreens lines-of credit and notes payable since December 31,
2010 include:
RFA AD&C Facility. During the first quarter of 2011, Bluegreen repaid $4.6 million of the
outstanding balance under this facility, including the repayment in full of a loan collateralized
by Bluegreens Fountains Resort in Orlando, Florida.
H4BG Communities Facility. During the first quarter of 2011, Bluegreen repaid $1.7 million of the
outstanding balance under this facility.
Wells Fargo Term Loan. During the first quarter of 2011, Bluegreen repaid $3.3 million of the
outstanding balance under this facility.
Receivable-Backed Notes Payable
Bluegreens pledged receivables under its receivable-backed notes payable as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010 had a principal balance before purchase accounting adjustments of
approximately $538.7 million and $571.9 million, respectively.
2011 Liberty Bank Facility. In February 2011, Bluegreen entered into a new revolving hypothecation
facility with certain participants in our 2008 Liberty Bank Facility. This new $60.0 million
facility (2011 Liberty Bank Facility) provides for an 85% advance on eligible receivables pledged
under the facility during a two-year period ending in February 2013, subject to eligible collateral
and terms and conditions Bluegreen believes to be customary for transactions of this type.
Availability under the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility is reduced by amounts currently outstanding to
certain syndicate participants under the 2008 Liberty Bank Facility ($45.4 million as of March 31,
2011), but as outstanding amounts on the 2008 Liberty Bank facility amortize over time, the 2011
Liberty Bank Facility will revolve up to $60.0 million. Principal and interest are repaid as cash
is collected on the pledged receivables, with the remaining balance due in February 2016.
Indebtedness under the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility bears interest at the Prime Rate plus 2.25%,
subject to a floor of 6.5%.
During the first quarter of 2011, Bluegreen pledged $6.6 million of VOI notes receivable to this
facility and received cash proceeds of $5.6 million. Bluegreen also repaid $0.1 million on the
facility.
NBA Receivables Facility. During the first quarter of 2011, Bluegreen repaid $1.6 million on this
facility.
Bluegreen has received a term sheet related to a contemplated amendment to the facility which would
allow Bluegreen to pledge additional timeshare receivables up to the $20 million borrowing limit,
with the additional advances not to exceed $5.0 million. Bluegreen may not be successful in its
efforts to enter into this amendment on the contemplated terms, or at all.
BB&T Purchase Facility. During the first quarter of 2011, Bluegreen pledged $3.7 million of VOI
notes receivable to this facility and received cash proceeds of $2.5 million.
37
Table of Contents
Quorum Purchase Facility. During the first quarter of 2011, Bluegreen pledged $1.4 million of VOI
notes receivable to this facility and received cash proceeds of $1.1 million.
Other Facilities. In addition to the payments on the above described facilities, during the first
quarter of 2011 Bluegreen repaid $41.0 million on its other receivable-backed notes payable
facilities.
Junior Subordinated Debentures
As more fully disclosed under the caption Junior Subordinated Debentures in Note 23 Debt to
the Companys audited consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, some of the Companys subsidiaries have formed
statutory business trusts (collectively, the Trusts), each of which issued trust preferred
securities and invested the proceeds thereof in its junior subordinated debentures. The Trusts are
variable interest entities in which the Companys subsidiaries are not the primary beneficiaries as
defined by the accounting guidance for consolidation. Accordingly, the Company does not consolidate
the operations of the Trusts; instead, the Trusts are accounted for under the equity method of
accounting. Interest on the junior subordinated debentures and distributions on the trust
preferred securities are payable quarterly in arrears at the same interest rate.
On March 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by Levitt Capital Trust (LCT)
I contractually changed from a fixed-rate of 8.11% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR +
3.85% (4.15% as of March 31, 2011).
On July 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by LCT II contractually changed
from a fixed-rate of 8.09% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR + 3.80% (4.10% as of March
31, 2011).
On March 30, 2010, the interest rates on the securities issued by Bluegreen Statutory Trust
(BST) I contractually changed from a fixed-rate of 9.160% to a variable rate equal to the 3-month
LIBOR + 4.90% (5.20% as of March 31, 2011).
On July 30, 2010, the interest rate on the securities issued by BST II and BST III
contractually changed from a fixed- rate of 9.158% and 9.193%, respectively, to a variable rate
equal to the 3-month LIBOR + 4.85% (5.15% as of March 31, 2011).
13. Interest Expense
The following table is a summary of the Companys consolidated interest expense and the
amounts capitalized (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended, | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
As Revised | ||||||||
Real Estate and Other: |
||||||||
Interest incurred on borrowings |
$ | 18,690 | 21,329 | |||||
Interest capitalized |
(65 | ) | (71 | ) | ||||
18,625 | 21,258 | |||||||
Financial Services: |
||||||||
Interest on deposits |
4,398 | 7,087 | ||||||
Interest on advances from FHLB |
115 | 958 | ||||||
Interest on short term borrowings |
6 | 8 | ||||||
Interest on debentures and bonds payable |
4,008 | 3,791 | ||||||
8,527 | 11,844 | |||||||
Total interest expense |
$ | 27,152 | 33,102 | |||||
38
Table of Contents
14. Noncontrolling Interests
The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests held by others in the Companys
subsidiaries at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp |
$ | (5,084 | ) | 7,823 | ||||
Bluegreen |
46,176 | 44,362 | ||||||
Joint ventures |
23,762 | 26,071 | ||||||
$ | 64,854 | 78,256 | ||||||
The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests (loss) earnings recognized by
others with respect to the Companys subsidiaries for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(As Revised) | ||||||||
Noncontrolling Interests
Continuing Operations |
||||||||
BankAtlantic Bancorp |
$ | (12,694 | ) | (13,019 | ) | |||
Bluegreen |
1,417 | (1,493 | ) | |||||
Joint ventures |
1,562 | 1,192 | ||||||
$ | (9,715 | ) | (13,320 | ) | ||||
15. Segment Reporting
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in
assessing performance and deciding how to allocate resources. Reportable segments consist of one or
more operating segments with similar economic characteristics, products and services, production
processes, type of customer, distribution system or regulatory environment.
The information provided for segment reporting is based on internal reports utilized by
management of the Company and its subsidiaries. The presentation and allocation of assets and
results of operations may not reflect the actual economic costs of the segments as standalone
businesses. If a different basis of allocation were utilized, the relative contributions of the
segments might differ but the relative trends in the segments operating results would, in
managements view, likely not be impacted.
The Companys business activities currently consist of (i) Real Estate and Other activities
and (ii) Financial Services activities. These business activities are reported through six
segments: BFC Activities, Real Estate Operations, Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen Communities,
BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company.
Bluegreens results of operations are reported through the Bluegreen Resorts and Bluegreen
Communities segments. The Companys Financial Services business activities include BankAtlantic
Bancorps results of operations and are reported in two segments: BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic
Bancorp Parent Company.
The Company evaluates segment performance based on its segment net income (loss).
The following summarizes the aggregation of the Companys operating segments into reportable
segments:
BFC Activities
The BFC Activities segment consists of BFC operations, dividends from our investment in
Benihana, and other operations of Woodbridge described below. BFC operations primarily consist of
our corporate overhead and general and administrative expenses, including the expenses of
Woodbridge, the financial results of a venture
39
Table of Contents
partnership that BFC controls and other equity investments, as well as income and expenses
associated with BFCs shared service operations which provides human resources, risk management,
investor relations and executive office administration services to BankAtlantic Bancorp and
Bluegreen. This segment also includes investments made by our wholly owned subsidiary, BFC/CCC,
Inc. (BFC/CCC). Woodbridges other operations include the activities of Pizza Fusion Holdings,
Inc., a restaurant operator and franchisor engaged in the quick service and organic food
industries, and Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC, as well as certain other investments.
Real Estate Operations
The Companys Real Estate Operations segment is comprised of the operations of Woodbridge and
the subsidiaries through which Woodbridge historically conducted its real estate business
activities. It currently includes the operations of Carolina Oak, which engaged in homebuilding
activities in South Carolina prior to the suspension of those activities in the fourth quarter of
2008, and Cypress Creek Holdings, LLC (Cypress Creek Holdings), which engages in leasing
activities. The Real Estate Operations segment also includes the business activities of Core,
certain subsidiaries of which were deconsolidated from our financial statements during the fourth
quarter of 2010.
Bluegreen Resorts
Bluegreen Resorts markets, sells and manages real estate-based VOIs in resorts generally
located in popular, high-volume, drive-to vacation destinations, which were developed or acquired
by Bluegreen or developed by others. Bluegreen also earn fees from third-party resort developers
and timeshare owners for providing services such as sales and marketing, mortgage servicing,
construction management, title, and resort management.
Bluegreen Communities
Bluegreen Communities acquires, develops and subdivides property and markets
residential land homesites. The majority of these homesites are sold directly to retail customers
who seek to build a home, in some cases on properties featuring a golf course and related
amenities. On March 24, 2011, Bluegreen announced that it has engaged advisors to explore strategic
alternatives for Bluegreen Communities, including a possible sale of the division. However,
Bluegreen may not elect to pursue any of the strategic alternatives it may consider and any such
alternatives, if pursued may not ultimately be consummated, or if consummated, may not result in
improvements to its financial condition and operating results or otherwise achieve the benefits
Bluegreen expects to realize from the transaction.
Beginning in January 1, 2011, Bluegreen modified its measure of segment operating profit
(loss) to include certain bank-related charges, which were previously reported as corporate general
and administrative expenses. In connection with this modification, Bluegreen revised the prior
periods presentation to be comparable with the current period, which increased Bluegreen Resorts
segment operating loss by $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 from the amounts
previously reported.
BankAtlantic
The Companys BankAtlantic segment consists of the banking operations of BankAtlantic.
BankAtlantic activities consist of retail banking services delivered through a network of branches
located in Florida.
BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company
The BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company segment consists of the operations of BankAtlantic
Bancorp Parent Company, including financing activities, capital management and costs of
acquisitions.
40
Table of Contents
The tables below set forth the Companys segment information as of and for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
BankAtlantic | Unallocated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bancorp | Amounts | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BFC | Real estate | Bluegreen | Bluegreen | Parent | and | Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | Activities | Operations | Resorts | Communities | BankAtlantic | Company | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of real estate |
$ | | | 36,334 | 5,289 | | | | 41,623 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other resorts and communities operations revenue |
| | 17,200 | 434 | | | | 17,634 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenues |
271 | 17 | 10,764 | | | | (17 | ) | 11,035 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
| | | | 39,420 | 89 | 22,988 | 62,497 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Services non-interest income |
| | | | 22,913 | 209 | (396 | ) | 22,726 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
271 | 17 | 64,298 | 5,723 | 62,333 | 298 | 22,575 | 155,515 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sale of real estate |
| | 7,225 | 2,450 | | | | 9,675 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sale of other resorts and
communities operations |
| | 13,081 | 886 | | | | 13,967 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,361 | 1,402 | | | 4,716 | 3,784 | 15,889 | 27,152 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision/(reversal of provision) for loan losses |
| | | | 27,832 | (20 | ) | | 27,812 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
5,376 | 489 | 32,530 | 2,407 | | | 10,996 | 51,798 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | | | 46,154 | 3,432 | (286 | ) | 49,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
6,737 | 1,891 | 52,836 | 5,743 | 78,702 | 7,196 | 26,599 | 179,704 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridges
subsidiary |
| 11,305 | | | | | | 11,305 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates |
1,361 | | | | | 381 | 35 | 1,777 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
1,318 | | | | | | (744 | ) | 574 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income
taxes |
(3,787 | ) | 9,431 | 11,462 | (20 | ) | (16,369 | ) | (6,517 | ) | (4,733 | ) | (10,533 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
(144 | ) | | | | 1 | | 1,936 | 1,793 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(3,643 | ) | 9,431 | 11,462 | (20 | ) | (16,370 | ) | (6,517 | ) | (6,669 | ) | (12,326 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (3,643 | ) | 9,431 | 11,462 | (20 | ) | (16,370 | ) | (6,517 | ) | (6,669 | ) | (12,326 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(9,715 | ) | (9,715 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
$ | 3,046 | (2,611 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 90,352 | 36,539 | 839,564 | 89,836 | 4,424,566 | 317,860 | (73,265 | ) | 5,725,452 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
41
Table of Contents
BankAtlantic | Unallocated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bancorp | Amounts | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BFC | Real estate | Bluegreen | Bluegreen | Parent | and | Segment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Activities | Operations | Resorts | Communities | BankAtlantic | Company | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | (As Revised) | (As Revised) | (As Revised) | (As Revised) | (As Revised) | (As Revised) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of real estate |
$ | | | 24,606 | 3,246 | | | | 27,852 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other resorts and communities operations revenue |
| | 15,670 | 351 | | | | 16,021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other real estate revenues |
387 | 637 | 10,180 | | | | (17 | ) | 11,187 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
| | | | 47,715 | 78 | 24,508 | 72,301 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Services non-interest income |
| | | | 28,257 | 269 | (436 | ) | 28,090 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
387 | 637 | 50,456 | 3,597 | 75,972 | 347 | 24,055 | 155,451 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sale of real estate |
| | 2,735 | 5,368 | | | | 8,103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sale of other revenues |
| | 11,943 | 747 | | | | 12,690 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,838 | 3,310 | | | 8,256 | 3,563 | 16,135 | 33,102 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
| | | | 32,034 | (1,279 | ) | | 30,755 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
6,487 | 2,659 | 29,432 | 2,624 | | | 12,902 | 54,104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
| | | | 52,721 | 1,644 | (355 | ) | 54,010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
8,325 | 5,969 | 44,110 | 8,739 | 93,011 | 3,928 | 28,682 | 192,764 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates |
(31 | ) | | | | | 189 | 35 | 193 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
1,394 | 53 | (1,009 | ) | 438 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes |
(6,575 | ) | (5,279 | ) | 6,346 | (5,142 | ) | (17,039 | ) | (3,392 | ) | (5,601 | ) | (36,682 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Less: Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
(1,167 | ) | | | | 90 | | (2,754 | ) | (3,831 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(5,408 | ) | (5,279 | ) | 6,346 | (5,142 | ) | (17,129 | ) | (3,392 | ) | (2,847 | ) | (32,851 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
| (249 | ) | | | | | | (249 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (5,408 | ) | (5,528 | ) | 6,346 | (5,142 | ) | (17,129 | ) | (3,392 | ) | (2,847 | ) | (33,100 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling
interests |
(13,320 | ) | (13,320 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
$ | 10,473 | (19,780 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 117,380 | 255,510 | 914,345 | 105,457 | 4,688,001 | 432,225 | (162,352 | ) | 6,350,566 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
42
Table of Contents
16. Commitments and Contingencies
BFC
At June 30, 2009, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC had a 10% interest in a limited
partnership as a non-managing general partner. The partnership owns an office building located in
Boca Raton, Florida. In connection with the purchase of the office building in March 2006, BFC/CCC
guaranteed repayment of a portion of the non-recourse loan on the property on a joint and several
basis with the managing general partner. BFC/CCCs maximum exposure under this guarantee agreement
was $2.0 million (which was shared on a joint and several basis with the managing general partner).
In July 2009, BFC/CCCs wholly-owned subsidiary withdrew as a partner of the limited partnership
and transferred its 10% interest to an unaffiliated partner. In return, the partner to whom this
interest was assigned agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the release of BFC/CCC
from the guarantee. The partner was unable to secure such a release and that partner has agreed to
indemnify BFC/CCCs wholly-owned subsidiary for any losses that may arise under the guarantee after
the date of the assignment. No amounts are recorded in our financial statements at March 31, 2011
or December 31, 2010 for this joint venture.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC had a 10% interest in a limited liability company that
owned two commercial properties in Hillsborough County, Florida which served as collateral for an
approximately $26.0 million loan to the limited liability company. In connection with the purchase
of the commercial properties in November 2006, BFC and the unaffiliated member of the limited
liability company each guaranteed the payment of up to a maximum of $5.0 million for certain
environmental indemnities and specific obligations that were not related to the financial
performance of the properties. BFC and the unaffiliated member also entered into a cross
indemnification agreement which limited BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and
its affiliates. On March 25, 2011, the limited liability company reached a settlement with its
lender, pursuant to which it has conveyed the commercial properties securing the loan via a deed in
lieu of foreclosure. BFC and BFC/CCCs wholly-owned subsidiary were released from all obligations
and guarantees related to the two commercial properties. As of March 31, 2011, BFC recognized the
negative basis of its investment of approximately $1.3 million which is included in earnings from
unconsolidated affiliates.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 50% limited partner interest in a limited
partnership that has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owns an office building in
Tampa, Florida. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying amount of this investment was
approximately $278,000 and $282,000, respectively, which is included in investments in
unconsolidated affiliates in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. In
connection with the purchase of the office building by the limited liability company in June 2007,
BFC guaranteed the payment of certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are
not related to the financial performance of the asset up to a maximum of $15.0 million, or $25.0
million in the event of any petition or involuntary proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or
similar state insolvency laws or in the event of any transfer of interests not in accordance with
the loan documents. BFC and the unaffiliated members also entered into a cross indemnification
agreement which limits BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates. No
amounts are recorded in the Companys financial statements at March 31, 2011 or December 31, 2010
for the obligations associated with this guarantee based on the potential indemnification by
unaffiliated members and the limit of the specific obligations to non-financial matters.
Based on the current accounting guidance associated with the consolidation of variable
interest entities implemented on January 1, 2010, we are not deemed the primary beneficiaries in
connection with the above mentioned BFC/CCC investments and do not consolidate these entities into
our financial statements. We do not have the power to direct the activities that can significantly
impact the performance of these entities.
Woodbridge
Levitt and Sons, Woodbridges former wholly-owned homebuilding subsidiary, had approximately
$33.3 million of surety bonds related to its ongoing projects at November 9, 2007, the date on
which Levitt and Sons and substantially all of its subsidiaries filed voluntary bankruptcy
petitions (the Chapter 11 Cases). In the event that these obligations are drawn and paid by the
surety, Woodbridge could be responsible for up to $7.6 million plus costs and expenses in
accordance with the surety indemnity agreements executed by Woodbridge. At both March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, Woodbridge had $490,000 in surety bond accruals related to certain bonds where
management believes it to be probable that Woodbridge will be required to reimburse the surety
under applicable indemnity agreements. It is unclear whether and to what extent the remaining
outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be
responsible for additional amounts beyond the
43
Table of Contents
previous accrued amount. Woodbridge will not receive any repayment, assets or other
consideration as recovery of any amounts it may be required to pay. In September 2008, a surety
filed a lawsuit to require Woodbridge to post collateral against a portion of surety bond exposure
in connection with demands made by a municipality. Based on claims by the municipality on the
bonds, the surety requested that Woodbridge post a $4.0 million escrow deposit while the matter was
being litigated with the municipality. While Woodbridge did not believe that the municipality had
the right to demand payment under the bonds, Woodbridge complied with that request. In August 2010,
a motion for summary judgment was entered in Woodbridges favor terminating any obligations under
the bonds. The municipality has appealed the decision.
On February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court presiding over the Chapter 11 Cases entered an
order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors. That order also approved the settlement pursuant to the
settlement agreement that was entered into with the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the
Settlement Agreement). No appeal or rehearing of the Bankruptcy Courts order was filed by any
party, and the settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time payment was made in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement as amended. Under cost method
accounting, the cost of settlement and the related $52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was
determined as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant to the settlement
agreement) was recognized into income in the first quarter of 2009, resulting in a $40.4 million
gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, we agreed to
share a percentage of any tax refund attributable to periods prior to the bankruptcy with the
Debtors Estate. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we accrued approximately $10.7 million in connection
with the portion of the tax refund which may be payable to the Debtors Estate pursuant to the
settlement agreement. As a result, the gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary for the year
ended December 31, 2009 was reduced to $29.7 million. Additionally, in the second quarter of 2010,
we increased the $10.7 million accrual by approximately $1.0 million, representing a portion of an
additional tax refund which we expect to receive due to a recent change in Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) guidance that will likely be required to be paid to the Debtors Estate pursuant to the
Settlement Agreement. We have placed into escrow approximately $8.4 million, which represents the
portion of the tax refund received to date from the Internal Revenue Service that would be payable
to the Debtors Estate under the Settlement Agreement.
See also Note 2 above for a discussion of the pending appraisal rights litigation relating to
the merger between BFC and Woodbridge and Note 20 below for a description of certain material
developments relating to litigation and legal proceedings to which BFC and Woodbridge are currently
subject.
Bluegreen
In the ordinary course of its business, Bluegreen becomes subject to claims or proceedings
from time to time relating to the purchase, subdivision, sale or financing of real estate
(including VOIs). Additionally, from time to time, Bluegreen becomes involved in disputes with
existing and former employees, vendors, taxing jurisdictions and various other parties. From time
to time in the ordinary course of business, Bluegreen also received individual consumer complaints,
as well as complaints received through regulatory and consumer agencies, including Offices of State
Attorney Generals. We take these matters seriously and attempt to resolve any such issues as they
arise. Unless otherwise described below, Bluegreen believes that these claims are routine
litigation incidental to its business.
Destin, Florida Deposit Dispute Lawsuit
In Cause No. 2006-Ca-3374, styled Joseph M. Scheyd, Jr., P.A. vs. Bluegreen Vacations
Unlimited, Inc.; Hubert A. Laird; and MSB of Destin, Inc., in the Circuit Court of the First
Judicial Circuit in and for Okaloosa County, Florida, the Plaintiff as escrow agent brought an
interpleader action seeking a determination as to whether Bluegreen, as purchaser, or Hubert A.
Laird and MSB of Destin, Inc. as seller, were entitled to the $1.4 million escrow deposit being
maintained with the escrow agent pursuant to a purchase and sale contract for real property located
in Destin, Florida. Both Bluegreen and the seller brought cross-claims for breach of the
underlying purchase and sale contract. The sellers complaint, as amended, includes a fraud
allegation, contends that Bluegreen failed to perform under the terms of the purchase and sale
contract and claims entitlement to the full amount in escrow. Bluegreen maintains its decision not
to close on the purchase of the property was proper under the terms of the purchase and sale
contract and therefore is entitled to a return of the full escrow deposit. A trial date of May 31,
2011 has been set for this matter. Bluegreen believes the sellers allegations are without merit
and intends to vigorously defend this claim.
44
Table of Contents
Inquiry into Consumer Matters by the Office of the Florida Attorney General
The Office of the Attorney General for the State of Florida (the AGSF) has advised Bluegreen
that it has accumulated a number of consumer complaints since 2005 against Bluegreen and/or its
affiliates related to Bluegreens timeshare sales and marketing, and has requested that Bluegreen
respond on a collective basis as to how Bluegreen has or would resolve the complaints. The AGSF has
also requested that Bluegreen enter into a written agreement in which to establish a process and
timeframe for determining consumer eligibility for relief (including, where applicable, monetary
restitution). Bluegreen has determined that many of these complaints were previously addressed
and/or resolved by Bluegreen. Bluegreen does not believe this matter will have a material effect
on its results of operations, financial condition or on its sales and marketing activities in
Florida.
Mountain Lakes Mineral Rights
Bluegreen Southwest One, L.P. (Southwest), a subsidiary of Bluegreen Corporation, is the
developer of the Mountain Lakes subdivision in Texas. In Cause No. 28006, styled Betty Yvon
Lesley et a1. v. Bluff Dale Development Corporation, Bluegreen Southwest One. L.P. et al., in
the 266th Judicial District Court, Erath County, Texas, the plaintiffs filed a declaratory judgment
action against Southwest seeking to develop their reserved mineral interests in, on and under the
Mountain Lakes subdivision. The plaintiffs claims are based on property law, oil and gas law,
contract and tort theories. The property owners association and some of the individual landowners
have filed cross actions against Bluegreen, Southwest and individual directors of the property
owners association related to the mineral rights and certain amenities in the subdivision as
described below. On January 17, 2007, the court ruled that the restrictions placed on the
development that prohibited oil and gas production and development were invalid and not enforceable
as a matter of law, that such restrictions did not prohibit the development of the plaintiffs
prior reserved mineral interests and that Southwest breached its duty to lease the minerals to
third parties for development. The court further ruled that Southwest was the sole holder of the
right to lease the minerals to third parties. The order granting the plaintiffs motion was
severed into Cause No. 28769, styled Betty Yvon Lesley et a1. v. Bluff Dale Development
Corporation, Bluegreen Southwest One. L.P. et al. in the 266th Judicial District Court, Erath
County, Texas. Southwest appealed the trial courts ruling. On January 22, 2009, in Bluegreen
Southwest One, L.P. et al. v. Betty Yvon Lesley et al., in the 11th Court of Appeals, Eastland,
Texas, the Appellate Court reversed the trial courts decision and ruled in Southwests favor and
determined that all executive rights were owned by Southwest and then transferred to the individual
property owners in connection with the sales of land. All property owner claims were decided in
favor of Southwest. It was also decided that Southwest did not breach a fiduciary duty to the
plaintiffs as an executive rights holder. On May 14, 2009, the plaintiffs filed an appeal with the
Texas Supreme Court asking the Court to reverse the Appellate Courts decision in favor of
Southwest. On September 15, 2010 the Court heard oral arguments on whether to reverse or affirm the
Appellate Courts decision. No information is available as to when the Texas Supreme Court will
render a decision on the appeal.
Schawrz, et al. Lawsuit Regarding Community Amenities
On September 18, 2008, in Cause No. 2008-5U-CV-1358-WI, styled Paul A. Schwarz and Barbara
S. Schwarz v. Bluegreen Communities of Georgia, LLC and Bluegreen Corporation, in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Brunswick Division, the plaintiffs
brought suit alleging fraud and misrepresentation with regards to the construction of a marina at
the Sanctuary Cove subdivision located in Camden County, Georgia. The plaintiff subsequently
withdrew the fraud and misrepresentation counts and filed a count alleging violation of
racketeering laws. On January 25, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a second complaint seeking approval
to proceed with the lawsuit as a class action on behalf of more than 100 persons alleged to have
been harmed by the alleged activities in a similar manner. No decision has yet been made by the
Court as to whether a class will be certified. Bluegreen denies the allegations and intends to
vigorously defend the lawsuit.
45
Table of Contents
Community Cable Service, LLC Lawsuit
On June 3, 2010, in Cause No. 16-2009-CA-008028, styled Community Cable Service, LLC v.
Bluegreen Communities of Georgia, LLC and Sanctuary Cove at St. Andrews Sound Community
Association, Inc., a/k/a Sanctuary Cove Home Developers Association, Inc., in the Circuit
Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit in and for Duval County, Florida, the plaintiffs filed suit
alleging breach by Bluegreen Communities of Georgia and the community association of a bulk cable
TV services contract at Bluegreens Communities Sanctuary Cove single family residential community
being developed in Waverly, Georgia. In its complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that unpaid bulk
cable fees are due from the defendants, and that the non-payment of fees will continue to accrue on
a monthly basis. Bluegreen and the community association have responded that the plaintiffs
breached the parties contract. The case went to mediation on September 20, 2010, but no
resolution was reached. Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment which have been set
for hearing on August 11, 2011. A trial date, if necessary, will be set after the Court rules on
the parties summary judgment motion.
BankAtlantic Bancorp
Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk were (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Commitments to sell fixed rate residential loans |
$ | 5,580 | 14,408 | |||||
Commitments to originate loans held for sale |
4,098 | 12,571 | ||||||
Commitments to originate loans held to maturity |
23,446 | 10,693 | ||||||
Commitments to purchase residential loans |
12,987 | 2,590 | ||||||
Commitments to extend credit, including the undisbursed
portion of loans in process |
363,682 | 357,730 | ||||||
Standby letters of credit |
8,592 | 9,804 | ||||||
Commercial lines of credit |
87,479 | 77,144 |
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by BankAtlantic to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. BankAtlantics standby letters of credit are generally
issued to customers in the construction industry guaranteeing project performance. These types of
standby letters of credit had a maximum exposure of $7.1 million at March 31, 2011. BankAtlantic
also issues standby letters of credit to commercial lending customers guaranteeing the payment of
goods and services. These types of standby letters of credit had a maximum exposure of $1.5 million
at March 31, 2011. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing
arrangements and have maturities of one year or less. The credit risk involved in issuing letters
of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. BankAtlantic
may hold certificates of deposit and residential and commercial liens as collateral for such
commitments. Included in other liabilities at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $35,000
and $34,000, respectively, of unearned guarantee fees. There were no obligations associated with
these guarantees recorded in the financial statements.
BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries are parties to lawsuits as plaintiff or defendant
involving its bank operations, lending and tax certificates. Although BankAtlantic Bancorp believes
it has meritorious defenses in all current legal actions, the outcome of litigation and regulatory
matters and timing of ultimate resolution are inherently difficult to predict and uncertain.
Reserves are accrued for matters in which it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the
amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. These accrual amounts as of March 31, 2011 are not
material to the Companys financial statements. The actual costs of resolving these legal claims
may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for these claims.
A range of reasonably possible losses is estimated for matters in which it is reasonably
possible that a loss has been incurred or that a loss is probable but not reasonably estimable.
Management of BankAtlantic Bancorp currently estimates the aggregate range of reasonably possible
losses as $5.9 million to $16.6 million in excess of the accrued liability relating to these legal
matters. This estimated range of reasonably possible losses represents the estimated possible
losses over the life of such legal matters, which may span a currently indeterminable number of
years, and is based on information currently available. The matters underlying the estimated range
will change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly from this estimate. Those
matters for which a reasonable estimate is not possible are not included within this estimated
range and, therefore, this estimated range does not represent BankAtlantic Bancorps maximum loss exposure.
46
Table of Contents
In certain matters BankAtlantic Bancorp is unable to estimate the loss or reasonable range of
loss until additional developments in the case provide information sufficient to support an
assessment of the loss or range of loss. Frequently in these matters the claims are broad and the
plaintiffs have not quantified or factually supported the claim.
BankAtlantic Bancorp believes that liabilities arising from litigation and regulatory matters,
discussed below, in excess of the amounts currently accrued, if any, will not have a material
impact to BankAtlantic Bancorps financial statements. However, due to the significant
uncertainties involved in these legal matters, BankAtlantic Bancorp may incur losses in excess of
accrued amounts and an adverse outcome in these matters could be material to BankAtlantic Bancorps
financial statements.
The following is a description of the ongoing litigation and regulatory matters:
Class action securities litigation
In October 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp and current or former officers of BankAtlantic Bancorp
were named in a lawsuit which alleges that during the period of November 9, 2005 through October
25, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp and the named officers knowingly and/or recklessly made
misrepresentations of material fact regarding BankAtlantic and specifically BankAtlantics loan
portfolio and allowance for loan losses. The Complaint seeks to assert claims for violations of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 and seeks unspecified damages. On November 18, 2010,
a jury returned a verdict awarding $2.41 per share to shareholders who purchased shares of
BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock during the period of April 26, 2007 to October 26, 2007
who retained those shares until the end of the period. The jury rejected the plaintiffs claim for
the six month period from October 19, 2006 to April 25, 2007. Prior to the beginning of the trial,
the plaintiffs abandoned any claim for any prior period. On April 25, 2011, the Court granted
defendants post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law and vacated the jury verdict,
resulting in a judgment in favor of all defendants on all claims. On May 5, 2011, defendants filed
a motion for sanctions against plaintiffs and their counsel seeking reimbursement of their
attorneys fees and costs incurred in connection with this lawsuit. The plaintiffs have indicated
that they intend to appeal the Courts order setting aside the jury verdict.
In July 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp, certain officers and Directors were named in a lawsuit
which alleges that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties by engaging in certain
lending practices with respect to BankAtlantic Bancorps Commercial Real Estate Loan Portfolio. The
Complaint further alleges that BankAtlantic Bancorps public filings and statements did not fully
disclose the risks associated with the Commercial Real Estate Loan Portfolio and seeks damages on
behalf of BankAtlantic Bancorp. The case has been stayed pending final resolution of the class
action securities litigation.
On May 6, 2011, the Court instructed plaintiffs counsel to narrow the claims and defendants
in accord with the Courts rulings in the class action securities litigation. The Court then
invited defendants to move for summary judgment as to any remaining of such claims and defendants,
and expressed considerable doubt as to the viability of any claims in light of the judgments
entered in favor of defendants in the securities class action. Based on the Courts instructions,
BankAtlantic Bancorp believes this case will be resolved favorably to them and the individual
defendants.
Class Action Overdraft Processing Litigation
In November 2010, the two pending class action complaints against BankAtlantic associated with
overdraft fees were consolidated. The Complaint, which asserts claims for breach of contract and
breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, alleges that BankAtlantic improperly
re-sequenced debit card transactions from largest to smallest, improperly assessed overdraft fees
on positive balances, and improperly imposed sustained overdraft fees on customers. BankAtlantic
has filed a motion to dismiss which is pending with the Court.
Office of Thrift Supervision Overdraft Processing Investigation
On January 6, 2011, the Office of Thrift Supervision advised BankAtlantic that it had
determined, subject to receipt of additional information from BankAtlantic that BankAtlantic had
engaged in deceptive and unfair practices in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission
Act relating to certain of BankAtlantics deposit-related products. The OTS provided BankAtlantic
the opportunity to respond with any additional or
47
Table of Contents
clarifying information, and BankAtlantic submitted a written response to the OTS on February
7, 2011 addressing the OTSs position.
Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation
BankAtlantic Bancorp has received a notice of investigation from the Securities and Exchange
Commission, (SEC) Miami Regional Office and subpoenas for information. The subpoenas request a
broad range of documents relating to, among other matters, recent and pending litigation to which
BankAtlantic Bancorp is or was a party, certain of BankAtlantic Bancorps non-performing,
non-accrual and charged-off loans, BankAtlantic Bancorps cost saving measures, loan
classifications, BankAtlantic Bancorps asset workout subsidiary, and the recent Orders with the
OTS entered into by BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and BankAtlantic. Various current and
former employees have also received subpoenas for documents and testimony. BankAtlantic Bancorp is
fully cooperating with the SEC.
BankAtlantic Bancorp has received a letter from the Miami regional office staff of the SEC
indicating that the staff intends to recommend that the SEC bring a civil action against
BankAtlantic Bancorp alleging that BankAtlantic Bancorp violated certain provisions of federal
securities laws, including Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
thereunder. BankAtlantic Bancorp has also been informed that its chief executive officer received
a similar letter. Although the letters do not state the grounds for such recommendations, in
communications between BankAtlantic Bancorps counsel and the Miami regional office staff,
BankAtlantic Bancorp has learned that the basis for the recommended actions were many of the same
arguments brought in the private class action securities litigation recently concluded at the
district court level in favor of BankAtlantic Bancorp and the individual defendants. In addition,
the Miami regional office staff raised issues relating to the classification and valuation of
certain loans included in BankAtlantic Bancorps financial information for the last quarter of 2007
and in its annual report on Form 10-K for the 2007 fiscal year. If litigation is brought, the SEC
may seek remedies including an injunction against future violations of federal securities laws,
civil money penalties and an officer and director bar. BankAtlantic Bancorp believes that it has
fulfilled all of its obligations under securities laws and, if such actions are brought by the SEC
against BankAtlantic Bancorp and/or any of its officers, such actions would be vigorously defended.
Concentration of Credit Risk
BankAtlantic has a high concentration of its consumer home equity and commercial loans in the
State of Florida. Real estate values and general economic conditions have significantly
deteriorated since the origination dates of these loans. If market conditions in Florida do not
improve or deteriorate further, BankAtlantic may be exposed to significant credit losses in these
loan portfolios.
BankAtlantic purchases residential loans located throughout the country. The majority of
these residential loans are jumbo residential loans. A jumbo loan has a principal amount above the
industry-standard definition of conventional conforming loan limits. These loans could potentially
have outstanding loan balances significantly higher than related collateral values in distressed
areas of the country as a result of the decline in real estate values in residential housing
markets. Also included in this purchased residential loan portfolio are interest-only loans. The
structure of these loans results in possible increases in a borrowers loan payments when the
contractually required repayments change due to interest rate movement and the required
amortization of the principal amount. These payment increases could affect a borrowers ability to
meet the debt service on or repay the loan and lead to increased defaults and losses. At March 31,
2011, BankAtlantics residential loan portfolio included $494.1 million of interest-only loans,
which represents 47.3% of the residential loan portfolio. Interest-only residential loans
scheduled to become fully amortizing during the nine months ended December 31, 2011 and during the
year ended December 31, 2012 are $32.6 million and $53.2 million, respectively. If market
conditions in the areas where the collateral for BankAtlantics residential loans is located do not
improve or deteriorate further, BankAtlantic may be exposed to additional losses in this portfolio.
17. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
BFC is the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen. Woodbridge Holdings
Corporation became a wholly owned subsidiary of BFC upon consummation of the merger between
Woodbridge and BFC on September 21, 2009. Prior to the merger, BFC held an approximately 59% voting
interest in Woodbridge. BFC also has a direct non-controlling interest in Benihana. Shares of BFCs
Class A and Class B Common Stock representing a majority of BFCs total voting power are owned or
controlled by the Companys Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Alan B. Levan, and by
the Companys Vice Chairman, John E.
48
Table of Contents
Abdo, both of whom are also directors of Bluegreen and Benihana, and executive officers and
directors of BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic. In addition, Jarett S. Levan, the son of Alan
B. Levan, is a director and executive officer of the Company, BankAtlantic Bancorp and
BankAtlantic.
The following table presents related party transactions relating to the shared service
arrangements between BFC, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010. All amounts were eliminated in consolidation.
BankAtlantic | ||||||||||||||||
BFC | Bancorp | Bluegreen | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Shared service income (expense) |
(a | ) | $ | 381 | (291 | ) | (90 | ) | ||||||||
Facilities cost and
information technology |
(b | ) | $ | (111 | ) | 99 | 12 | |||||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Shared service income (expense) |
(a | ) | $ | 594 | (492 | ) | (102 | ) | ||||||||
Facilities cost and
information technology |
(b | ) | $ | (139 | ) | 126 | 13 |
(a) | Pursuant to the terms of shared service agreements, subsidiaries of BFC provide human resources, risk management, investor relations, executive office administration and other services to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen. The costs of shared services are allocated based upon the usage of the respective services. | |
(b) | As part of the shared service arrangement, BFC pays BankAtlantic and Bluegreen for office facilities cost relating to BFC and its shared service operations. BFC also pays BankAtlantic for information technology related services pursuant to a separate agreement. For information technology related services, BFC paid BankAtlantic approximately $16,000 and $45,000 during the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had cash and cash equivalents accounts
at BankAtlantic with balances of approximately $1.3 million and $1.8 million, respectively. These
accounts were on the same general terms as deposits made by unaffiliated third parties. The Company
recognized nominal interest income in connection with these funds held at BankAtlantic during the
three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
In June 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic entered into a real estate advisory
service agreement with BFC for assistance relating to the work-out of loans and the sale of real
estate owned. Under the terms of the agreement, BFC receives a monthly fee of $12,500 from each of
BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp and, if BFCs efforts result in net recoveries of any
non-performing loan or the sale of real estate owned, BFC will receive a fee equal to 1% of the net
value recovered. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, BFC recognized an aggregate of
approximately $0.1 million of real estate advisory service fees under this agreement.
The Company leases office space to Pizza Fusion for approximately $68,000 annually pursuant to
a month-to-month lease which commenced in September 2008. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, Pizza Fusion paid approximately $24,000 under the lease, while $17,000 of rent payments
related to the lease were accrued at March 31, 2011.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, Bluegreen reimbursed the Company
approximately $99,000 and $385,000, respectively, for certain expenses incurred in assisting
Bluegreen in its efforts to explore potential additional sources of liquidity. Additionally, during
each of the three months ended March 31, 2011 and the three months ended March 31, 2010, Bluegreen
paid Snapper Creek, a subsidiary of the Company, approximately $150,000 in consideration for its
provision of a variety of management advisory services. We also have an agreement with Bluegreen
relating to the maintenance of different independent registered public accounting firms and
accordingly, at March 31, 2011, we accrued $0.5 million of fees related to certain procedures
performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, at
Bluegreen as part of its 2010 audit of our financial statements.
In 2009, Bluegreen entered into a land lease with Benihana, which constructed and operates a
restaurant at one of Bluegreens resort properties. During each of the first quarter of 2010 and
the first quarter of 2011, Bluegreen received lease payments from Benihana of less than $0.1
million.
BankAtlantic Bancorp in prior periods issued options to acquire shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A
49
Table of Contents
Common Stock to employees of BFC. Additionally, employees of BankAtlantic Bancorp
have transferred to affiliate companies and BankAtlantic Bancorp has elected, in accordance with
the terms of BankAtlantic Bancorps stock option plans, not to cancel the stock options held by
those former employees. BankAtlantic Bancorp also issues options and restricted stock awards to
BFC employees that perform services for BankAtlantic Bancorp. Expenses relating to all options and
restricted stock awards granted by BankAtlantic Bancorp to BFC employees was approximately $16,000
and $12,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Outstanding options to purchase BankAtlantic Bancorp stock and non-vested restricted
BankAtlantic Bancorp stock held by BFC employees consisted of the following as of March 31, 2011:
BankAtlantic Bancorp | ||||||||
Class A | Weighted | |||||||
Common | Average | |||||||
Stock | Price | |||||||
Options outstanding |
47,761 | $ | 55.26 | |||||
Non-vested restricted stock |
56,250 | |
Certain of the Companys affiliates, including its executive officers, have independently made
investments with their own funds in both public and private entities that the Company sponsored in
2001 and in which it holds investments.
Florida Partners Corporation owns 1,270,294 shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock and
133,314 shares of the Companys Class B Common Stock. Alan B. Levan may be deemed to be the
controlling shareholder of Florida Partners Corporation, and is also a member of its Board of
Directors.
18. Loss Per Common Share
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted loss per common share
attributable to the Company (in thousands, except per share data):
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(As Revised) | ||||||||
Basic loss per common share |
||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
$ | (12,326 | ) | (32,851 | ) | |||
Less: Noncontrolling interests loss from continuing operations |
(9,715 | ) | (13,320 | ) | ||||
Loss attributable to BFC |
(2,611 | ) | (19,531 | ) | ||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Loss allocable to common stock |
(2,799 | ) | (19,719 | ) | ||||
Discontinued operations attributable to BFC |
| (249 | ) | |||||
Net loss allocable to common shareholders |
$ | (2,799 | ) | (19,968 | ) | |||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
75,381 | 75,376 | ||||||
Basic loss per common share: |
||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.04 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||
Loss per share from discontinued operations |
| | ||||||
Basic loss per share |
$ | (0.04 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||
Diluted loss per common share: |
||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Loss allocable to common stock after assumed dilution |
(2,799 | ) | (19,719 | ) | ||||
Discontinued operations allocable to common stock |
| (249 | ) | |||||
Net loss allocable to common stock after assumed dilution |
$ | (2,799 | ) | (19,968 | ) | |||
Denominator |
||||||||
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
75,381 | 75,376 | ||||||
Diluted loss per share |
||||||||
Loss per share from continuing operations |
$ | (0.04 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||
Loss per share from discontinued operations |
| | ||||||
Diluted loss per share |
$ | (0.04 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, 2,492,176 and 2,510,693,
respectively, of options to acquire shares of Class A Common Stock were anti-dilutive.
50
Table of Contents
19. Parent Company Financial Information
BFCs parent company accounting policies are generally the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies appearing in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Companys investments in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen
and other consolidated entities are presented in the parent company financial statements as if
accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
BFCs parent company unaudited condensed statements of financial condition at March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, and unaudited condensed statements of operations and unaudited condensed
statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, are shown below:
Parent Company Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,251 | 4,958 | |||||
Securities available for sale |
38,106 | 38,829 | ||||||
Investment in Woodbridge Holdings, LLC |
123,834 | 115,999 | ||||||
Investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. |
| 2,377 | ||||||
Investment in and advances in other subsidiaries |
1,613 | 113 | ||||||
Notes receivable due from Woodbridge Holdings,
LLC |
4,573 | 2,012 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,412 | 1,444 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 170,789 | 165,732 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Advances from wholly owned subsidiaries |
$ | 569 | 942 | |||||
Investment deficit in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. |
8,080 | | ||||||
Other liabilities |
10,715 | 10,889 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
19,364 | 11,831 | ||||||
Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock |
11,029 | 11,029 | ||||||
Shareholders equity |
140,396 | 142,872 | ||||||
Total liabilities and Equity |
$ | 170,789 | 165,732 | |||||
Parent Company Condensed Statements of Operations
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(As Revised) | ||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 417 | 263 | |||||
Expenses |
1,580 | 1,914 | ||||||
(Loss) before earnings (loss) from subsidiaries |
(1,163 | ) | (1,651 | ) | ||||
Equity in earnings (loss) in Woodbridge Holdings, LLC |
7,334 | (10,580 | ) | |||||
Equity in loss in BankAtlantic Bancorp |
(10,328 | ) | (7,796 | ) | ||||
Equity in earnings (loss) in other subsidiaries |
1,546 | (473 | ) | |||||
Loss before income taxes |
(2,611 | ) | (20,500 | ) | ||||
Benefit for income taxes |
| (969 | ) | |||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(2,611 | ) | (19,531 | ) | ||||
Equity in subsidiaries discontinued operations |
| (249 | ) | |||||
Net loss |
(2,611 | ) | (19,780 | ) | ||||
5% Preferred Stock dividends |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Net loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (2,799 | ) | (19,968 | ) | |||
51
Table of Contents
Parent Company Statements of Cash Flow
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(As Revised) | ||||||||
Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
$ | (4,194 | ) | (1,155 | ) | |||
Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale |
8,733 | 1,200 | ||||||
Distribution from subsidiaries |
91 | 30,085 | ||||||
Purchase of securities |
(8,149 | ) | (12,851 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
675 | 18,434 | ||||||
Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Preferred stock dividends paid |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(3,707 | ) | 17,091 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
4,958 | 1,308 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 1,251 | 18,399 | |||||
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing
and financing activities |
||||||||
(Decrease) increase in accumulated other comprehensive income,
net of income taxes |
$ | (451 | ) | 723 | ||||
Net increase in shareholders equity from the effect of subsidiaries
capital transactions, net of income taxes |
609 | 814 | ||||||
Net decrease in shareholders equity resulting from
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
| (1,496 | ) |
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, securities available for sale included
approximately $17.1 million and $17.6 million, respectively, of readily marketable securities, as
well as our investment in Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock, the fair value of which was $21.0
and $21.1 million, respectively.
Approximately $4.7 million of the amounts set forth as other liabilities at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 represent amounts due in connection with the settlement of a class action
litigation that arose in connection with exchange transactions that BFC entered into in 1989 and
1991. BFC is required to repay this obligation as settlement holders submit their claims to BFC.
20. Litigation
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in our legal proceedings from
those previously disclosed in Note 37 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (see also Note 16 in this
report for information relating to BankAtlantic Bancorps and Bluegreens material claims or
proceedings).
AmTrust Bank v. Woodbridge Holdings, LLC and Carolina Oak Homes, LLC, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
During November 2009, AmTrust Bank (AmTrust) filed an action against Woodbridge and Carolina
Oak alleging default under a promissory note and breach of a guaranty related to an approximately
$37.2 million loan which was collateralized by property owned by Carolina Oak and as to which
Woodbridge was the obligor. During December 2009, the OTS closed AmTrust and appointed the FDIC as
receiver. The FDIC subsequently sold the loan to an investor group. Effective April 26, 2011,
Woodbridge and Carolina Oak entered into a settlement agreement with the investor group to resolve
the disputes and litigation between them. Under the terms and conditions of the settlement
agreement, (i) Woodbridge paid $2.5 million to the investor group, (ii) Carolina Oak conveyed to
the investor group the real property securing the loan and (iii) the investor group agreed not to
pursue certain remedies,
including a deficiency judgment, and after the expiration of an agreed-upon time period, to
fully release Woodbridge and Carolina Oak, in each case subject to certain conditions.
52
Table of Contents
Class Action Litigation
On January 25, 2008, plaintiff Robert D. Dance filed a purported class action complaint as a
putative purchaser of securities against Woodbridge and certain of its officers and directors,
asserting claims under the federal securities law and seeking damages. This action was filed in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and is captioned Dance v.
Levitt Corp. et al., No. 08-CV-60111-DLG. The securities litigation purports to be brought on
behalf of all purchasers of Woodbridges securities beginning on January 31, 2007 and ending on
August 14, 2007. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of
the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by issuing a series of false and/or
misleading statements regarding financial results, prospects and condition. During April 2011, a
preliminary agreement was reached to settle the matter, pursuant to which Woodbridge would pay to
the plaintiffs a total of $1.95 million which amount is fully
insured without participation by the Company. The agreement does not contain any admission of
responsibility by Woodbridge or any other of the named defendants. The settlement remains subject
to notice to the class and approval by the presiding court, and may not be consummated on the
contemplated terms, or at all.
21. New Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2011-02, A Creditors Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring
(ASU 2011-02), which amends guidance for evaluating whether the restructuring of a receivable by
a creditor is a troubled debt restructuring (a TDR). ASU 2011-02 responds to concerns that
creditors are inconsistently applying existing guidance for identifying TDRs. The main provision
of ASU 2011-02 will require a creditor to separately conclude whether the restructuring constitutes
a concession and whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties, in order to determine
if a restructuring constitutes a TDR. Guidance is also provided to assist the creditor in
evaluating these two criteria. ASU 2011-02 also clarifies that a creditor is precluded from using
the effective interest rate test, as described in the debtors guidance on restructuring payables,
when evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a TDR. ASU 2011-02 will become effective
beginning with the quarterly period ending September 30, 2011. Retrospective application is
required for any restructurings occurring on or after January 1, 2011 for purposes of identifying
and disclosing TDRs. However, an entity should apply prospectively changes in the method used to
calculate impairment on receivables. At the same time that we adopt ASU 2011-02, we will be
required to disclose any activity-based information about TDRs that was previously deferred by ASU
No. 2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings.
Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of these Accounting Standards Updates is not expected to
have a material impact on our financial statements.
53
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
BFC Financial Corporation (BFC or, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise
requires, we, us, our or the Company) is a diversified holding company whose principal
holdings include a controlling interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries,
including BankAtlantic (BankAtlantic Bancorp), a controlling interest in Bluegreen Corporation
and its subsidiaries (Bluegreen), and a non-controlling interest in Benihana Inc. (Benihana).
As a result of its position as the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC is a
unitary savings bank holding company regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). As of
March 31, 2011, we had total consolidated assets of approximately $5.7 billion and shareholders
equity attributable to BFC of approximately $140.4 million.
Historically, BFCs business strategy has been to invest in and acquire businesses in diverse
industries either directly or through controlled subsidiaries. However, BFC believes that, in the
short term, the Companys and its shareholders interests are best served by BFC providing
strategic support to its existing investments. In furtherance of this strategy, the Company took
several steps in 2009 and 2010, including those described below, which it believes will enhance the
Companys prospects:
| During the third quarter of 2009, BFC and Woodbridge Holdings Corporation consummated their merger pursuant to which Woodbridge became a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC. | ||
| In the fourth quarter of 2009, our ownership interest in Bluegreen increased to 52% as a result of the purchase of an additional 23% interest in Bluegreen. | ||
| We have also increased our investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp through our participation in BankAtlantic Bancorps rights offerings to its shareholders during 2009 and 2010, which in the aggregate increased our economic interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp to 45% and our voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp to 71%. | ||
| We exited the land development business operated by Core Communities and sold substantially all of the associated commercial assets. Through a combination of transactions with Cores lenders, we realized a reduction in debt of approximately $186 million in 2010 with a further reduction of approximately $27 million anticipated to occur in the first half of 2011. The Company also eliminated substantially all of the ongoing expenses associated with Core. | ||
| During April 2011, Woodbridge and its wholly owned subsidiary, Carolina Oak Homes, LLC (Carolina Oak), entered into a settlement agreement to resolve the disputes and litigation between them and a lender relating to an approximately $37.2 million loan which was collateralized by property owned by Carolina Oak. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, (i) Woodbridge paid $2.5 million to the note holder, (ii) Carolina Oak conveyed to the note holder the real property securing the loan and (iii) the note holder agreed not to pursue certain remedies, including a deficiency judgment, and after the expiration of an agreed-upon time period, to fully release Woodbridge and Carolina Oak, in each case subject to certain conditions. |
BankAtlantic Bancorp recently announced its intention to pursue a new rights offering to its
shareholders of up to $30 million on its Class A Common Stock. We support the rights offering and
have indicated our willingness to participate; however, the amount of our investment in the rights
offering has not yet been determined by our Board of Directors.
In the future, depending on market conditions and other factors considered by our Board of
Directors, we may renew efforts to pursue strategic growth and consider other opportunities that
could change our ownership in our affiliates or seek to make investments outside of our existing
portfolio. We do not currently have pre-determined parameters as to the industry or structure of
any future investment. In furtherance of our goals, we will continue to evaluate various financing
transactions that may present themselves, including raising additional debt or equity as well as
other alternative sources of new capital.
During July 2010, Benihana announced its intention to engage in a formal review of strategic
alternatives, including a possible sale of the company. During March 2011, Bluegreen announced its
intention to evaluate strategic alternatives for its Bluegreen Communities division, including a
possible sale of the division. Each company has engaged advisors to assist it in pursuing strategic
alternatives. BFC is supportive of Benihana and Bluegreen in achieving their objectives.
54
Table of Contents
Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) require that BFC consolidate the financial
results of the entities in which it has controlling interest. As a consequence, the assets and
liabilities of all such entities are presented on a consolidated basis in BFCs financial
statements. However, except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of the consolidated
entities, including BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen and Woodbridge, are not direct obligations of
BFC and are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the assets of those entities are not available to BFC
absent a dividend or distribution from those entities. The recognition by BFC of income from
controlled entities is determined based on the total percent of economic ownership in those
entities. At March 31, 2011, we owned approximately 52% of Bluegreens common stock and had an
approximately 45% ownership interest and 70% voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp.
The Companys business activities currently consist of (i) Real Estate and Other Activities
and (ii) Financial Services. We currently report our results of operations through six reportable
segments: Our Real Estate and Other business activities include the following four reportable
segments: BFC Activities; Real Estate Operations; and Bluegreen Resorts and Bluegreen Communities,
the segments through which Bluegreens results of operations are reported. The Companys Financial
Services business activities include BankAtlantic Bancorps results of operations and contain the
other two reportable segments: BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company. See Note 15 of
the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our
segments.
Forward Looking Statements
Except for historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this
document contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. When used
herein, the words anticipate, believe, estimate, may, intend, expect and similar
expressions identify certain of such forward-looking statements. Actual results, performance, or
achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed, or implied by the
forward-looking statements contained herein. These forward-looking statements are based largely on
our expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that are subject to change
based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond our control. When considering those
forward-looking statements, the reader should keep in mind the risks, uncertainties and other
cautionary statements made in this report. The reader should not place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statement, which speaks only as of the date made. This document also contains
information regarding the past performance of our investments and the reader should note that prior
or current performance of investments is not a guarantee or indication of future performance.
Some factors which may affect the accuracy of the forward-looking statements apply generally
to the financial services, real estate, resort development and vacation ownership, and restaurant
industries, while other factors apply more specifically to us. Risks and uncertainties associated
with BFC, including its wholly-owned Woodbridge subsidiary, include, but are not limited to:
| risks associated with the Companys current business strategy, including the risk that BFC will not be in a position to provide strategic support to its affiliated entities or that such support will not achieve the anticipated benefits; | ||
| BFC has negative cash flow and limited sources of cash which may present certain risks to its ongoing operations; | ||
| the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting the Company and its subsidiaries, and their operations, markets, products and services; | ||
| the risk that creditors of the Companys subsidiaries or other third parties may seek to recover distributions or dividends made by such subsidiaries or other amounts owed by such subsidiaries from their respective parent companies, including BFC; | ||
| BFCs shareholders interests may be diluted if additional shares of BFCs common stock are issued, and BFCs public company investments may be diluted if BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen or Benihana issue additional shares of its stock; | ||
| adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market and other capital markets and the impact of such conditions on the activities of the Company and its subsidiaries; | ||
| the impact of the recent economic downturn on the Company and the price and liquidity of its common stock and on BFCs ability to obtain additional capital, including the risk that if BFC needs or otherwise |
55
Table of Contents
believes it is advisable to issue debt or equity securities to fund its operations, it may not be possible to issue any such securities on favorable terms, if at all; | |||
| strategic alternatives being evaluated by entities in which the Company has investments may not ultimately be pursued or consummated or, if consummated, result in the benefits expected to be achieved; | ||
| the performance of entities in which the Company has made investments may not be profitable or their results as anticipated; | ||
| BFC is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries to fund its operations; BankAtlantic Bancorp is currently prohibited from paying dividends and may not be in a position to pay dividends in the future, whether as a result of such restrictions continuing in the future or otherwise; Bluegreen has historically not paid dividends on its common stock and its ability to pay dividends may be limited by the terms of certain of its indebtedness; | ||
| the uncertainty regarding the amount of cash that will be required to be paid to Woodbridge shareholders who exercised appraisal rights in connection with Woodbridges merger with BFC; | ||
| the risk that final releases relating to the resolution of certain Woodbridge indebtedness may not be obtained; | ||
| risks associated with the securities we hold directly or indirectly, including the risk that we may be required to record impairment charges with respect to such securities; | ||
| the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP involves making estimates, judgments and assumptions, and any changes in estimates, judgments and assumptions used could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and operating results; | ||
| the risk that the amount of any tax refund that we may receive in the future may be less than expected, or received later than expected; | ||
| uncertainties regarding enacted or currently proposed legislation regarding regulation of companies within the financial services industry, including bank holding companies, and the potential impact of such legislation on our operations and the operations of BankAtlantic Bancorp, as well as the risk that BFC will be required by the OTS to enter into a Cease and Desist Order with respect to its ownership and oversight of BankAtlantic Bancorp; | ||
| the risks related to litigation and other legal proceedings against BFC and its subsidiaries, including the legal and other professional fees and other costs and expenses of such proceedings, as well as the impact of any finding of liability or damages on our financial condition and operating results; and | ||
| the Companys success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing. |
With respect to BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic, the risks and uncertainties include,
but are not limited to:
| the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting BankAtlantic Bancorp and its operations, markets, products and services, including the impact of the changing regulatory environment, a continued or deepening recession, continued decreases in real estate values, and increased unemployment or sustained high unemployment rates on its business generally, BankAtlantics regulatory capital ratios, the ability of its borrowers to service their obligations and its customers to maintain account balances and the value of collateral securing its loans; | ||
| credit risks and loan losses, and the related sufficiency of the allowance for loan losses, including the impact on the credit quality of BankAtlantic Bancorps loans (including those held in the asset workout subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp) of a sustained downturn in the economy and in the real estate market and other changes in the real estate markets in BankAtlantic Bancorps trade area and where its collateral is located; | ||
| the risks of additional charge-offs, impairments and required increases in BankAtlantic Bancorps allowance for loan losses associated with the economy; | ||
| the impact of regulatory proceedings and litigation regarding overdraft fees; | ||
| the risks associated with maintaining compliance with the Cease and Desist Orders entered into by BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic, including risks that compliance will adversely impact operations, risks associated with failing to comply with regulatory mandates and the risk of imposition of additional regulatory requirements and/or fines; | ||
| the uncertain impact of legal proceedings on BankAtlantic Bancorps financial condition or operations including the risk that the securities class action litigation verdict may not be overturned on appeal; | ||
| the risk that changes in interest rates and the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws including their impact on BankAtlantics net interest margin; | ||
| adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market and other financial and credit markets and the impact of such conditions on BankAtlantic Bancorps activities and ability to raise capital; |
56
Table of Contents
| the sale of BankAtlantics Tampa branches may not be consummated pursuant to its terms, at the time anticipated or at all, and that the transaction may not have the positive financial impact currently anticipated; | ||
| BankAtlantic Bancorp may raise additional capital and such capital may be highly dilutive to BankAtlantic Bancorps shareholders, including BFC, or may not be available; | ||
| the risks associated with the impact of periodic valuation testing of goodwill, deferred tax assets and other assets; and | ||
| BankAtlantic Bancorps success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing. | ||
With respect to Bluegreen, the risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: | |||
| the overall state of the economy, interest rates and the availability of financing may affect Bluegreens ability to market vacation ownership interests (VOIs) and residential homesites; | ||
| Bluegreen would incur substantial losses and its liquidity position could be adversely impacted if the customers it finances default on their obligations; | ||
| while Bluegreen has attempted to restructure its business to reduce its need for and reliance on financing for liquidity in the short term, there is no assurance that such restructuring will be successful or that its business and profitability will not otherwise continue to depend on its ability to obtain financing, which may not be available on favorable terms, or at all; | ||
| Bluegreens future success depends on its ability to market its products successfully and efficiently; | ||
| Bluegreen is subject to the risks of the real estate market and the risks associated with real estate development, including the continued decline in real estate values and the deterioration of real estate sales; | ||
| Bluegreen may not be successful in increasing or expanding its fee-based services relationships and its fee-based service activities may not be profitable, which may have an adverse impact on its results of operations and financial condition; | ||
| Bluegreens results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely impacted if Bluegreen Resorts does not continue to participate in exchange networks or its customers are not satisfied with the networks in which it participates; | ||
| Bluegreens exploration of strategic alternatives for its Bluegreen Communities involves a number of risks, including that it may divert managements attention from its business activities, result in additional impairment charges and not ultimately lead to Bluegreen consummating a transaction or otherwise realizing improvements in its operating results and financial condition; | ||
| claims for development-related defects could adversely affect Bluegreens financial condition and operating results; | ||
| the resale market for VOIs could adversely affect Bluegreens business; | ||
| Bluegreen may be adversely affected by extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations and changes in applicable laws and regulations, including the imposition of additional taxes on operations. In addition, results of audits of Bluegreens tax returns or those of its subsidiaries may have a material and adverse impact on its financial condition; | ||
| environmental liabilities, including claims with respect to mold or hazardous or toxic substances, could have a material adverse impact on Bluegreens business; | ||
| the ratings of third-party rating agencies could adversely impact Bluegreens ability to obtain, renew, or extend credit facilities, debt, or otherwise raise capital; | ||
| inherent uncertainties involved in estimates, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Any changes in estimates, judgments and assumptions used could have a material adverse impact on Bluegreen operating results and financial condition; and | ||
| the loss of the services of Bluegreens key management and personnel could adversely affect its business. |
In addition to the risks and factors identified above, reference is also made to other risks
and factors detailed in reports filed by the Company, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen with the
SEC including those disclosed in the Risk Factors section of such reports. The Company cautions
that the foregoing factors are not exclusive.
57
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies
Management views critical accounting policies as accounting policies that are important
to the understanding of our financial statements and also involve estimates and judgments about
inherently uncertain matters. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated statements of
financial condition and assumptions that affect the recognition of income and expenses on the
consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented. Actual results could differ
significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to
significant change in subsequent periods relate to the determination of the allowance for loan
losses, the valuation of real estate and its impairment reserves, evaluation of goodwill and other
intangible assets for impairment, the valuation of securities, as well as the determination of
other-than-temporary declines in value, the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with
foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, revenue and cost recognition on percent complete
projects, estimated costs to complete construction, the valuation of the fair value of assets and
liabilities in the application of the acquisition method of accounting, the amount of deferred tax
asset valuation allowance, accounting for uncertain tax positions, accounting for contingencies,
and assumptions used in the valuation of stock based compensation. The accounting policies that we
have identified as critical accounting policies are: (i) allowance for loan losses and notes
receivable; (ii) the valuation of retained interests in notes receivable sold and the related
gains on sales of notes receivable; (iii) the valuation of Bluegreens notes receivable deemed to
have been acquired by us; (iv) impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets; (v) the valuation
of securities as well as the determination of other-than-temporary declines in value; (vi)
accounting for business combinations; (vii) the valuation of real estate; (viii) revenue and cost
recognition on percentage-of- completion projects; (ix) estimated cost to complete construction;
(x) accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowance; and (xi) accounting for contingencies.
For a more detailed discussion of these critical accounting policies see Critical Accounting
Policies appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 21 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included under
Item 1 of this report for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements applicable to the Company
and its subsidiaries.
Summary of Consolidated Results of Operations
The table below sets forth the Companys summarized results of operations (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(As Revised) | ||||||||
Real Estate and Other |
$ | 10,561 | (12,330 | ) | ||||
Financial Services |
(22,887 | ) | (20,521 | ) | ||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(12,326 | ) | (32,851 | ) | ||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
| (249 | ) | |||||
Net loss |
(12,326 | ) | (33,100 | ) | ||||
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(9,715 | ) | (13,320 | ) | ||||
Net loss attributable to BFC |
(2,611 | ) | (19,780 | ) | ||||
5% Preferred stock dividends |
(188 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||
Net loss allocable to common stock |
$ | (2,799 | ) | (19,968 | ) | |||
Consolidated net loss attributable to BFC for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $2.6
million compared with a net loss of $19.8 million for the same period in 2010. The results of
discontinued operations related to Core Communities commercial leasing projects, are discussed
further in Note 4 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
The 5% Preferred Stock dividend represents the dividends paid by the Company on its 5%
Cumulative Preferred Stock.
The results of our business segments and other information on each segment are discussed below
in BFC Activities, Real Estate Operations, Bluegreen Resorts, Bluegreen Communities, BankAtlantic
and BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company.
58
Table of Contents
Revisions to Consolidated Financial Statements On November 16, 2009, we purchased an
additional 7.4 million shares of Bluegreens common stock. This share purchase increased our
ownership interest in Bluegreen to approximately 16.9 million shares, or approximately 52%, of
Bluegreens outstanding common stock. Accordingly, we are deemed to have a controlling interest in
Bluegreen and, under GAAP, Bluegreens results are consolidated in our financial statements. The
Company accounted for the acquisition of a controlling interest in Bluegreen in accordance with the
accounting guidance for business combinations, pursuant to which management was required to
evaluate the fair value of Bluegreens assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date. As
previously disclosed, the allocation of the purchase price was based on preliminary estimates of
the fair value of Bluegreens inventory and contracts, and was subject to change within the
measurement period as valuations were finalized. Additionally, any offset relating to
amortization/accretion was also retrospectively adjusted in the appropriate periods. As discussed
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, during the fourth
quarter of 2010, the Company finalized its valuations and adjusted the preliminary value assigned
to the assets and liabilities of Bluegreen in order to reflect additional information obtained
since the November 16, 2009 share acquisition date. These changes resulted in the following
adjustments at December 31, 2009: a decrease of approximately $6.9 million to real estate
inventory; an increase in other assets of approximately $3.5 million; an increase in other
liabilities of approximately $4.1 million; and a decrease in deferred income taxes of approximately
$7.1 million. Such adjustments resulted in a decrease to the bargain purchase gain related to the
share acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $183.1 million to $182.8 million. The
Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was
revised to reflect the impact of the amortization/accretion associated with the above adjustments
which resulted in a decrease to the net loss for the quarter of approximately $88,000 compared to
the previously reported amount.
Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2010, management identified certain errors in its
previously reported financial statements for 2010 and 2009. Because these errors were not material
to the Companys financial statements for 2010 or 2009, individually or in the aggregate, the
Company revised its previously reported 2010 first, second and third quarter financial statements
and its 2009 annual financial statements. These adjustments related to the following: the
recognition of interest income associated with the acquired notes receivable in accordance with the
accounting guidance Loans and Debt Securities with Deteriorated Credit Quality; an adjustment to
the provision for loan losses for the acquired notes receivable; interest expense recognition for
notes payable of certain defaulted debt at Woodbridges subsidiaries, Core Communities, LLC (Core
or Core Communities) and Carolina Oak Homes, LLC (Carolina Oak), at the defaulted interest
rate, where the stated interest rate was previously used; the recognition of income tax benefits
associated with unrealized gains in accumulated other comprehensive income; and an adjustment to
deferred taxes related to an impairment to real estate inventory which was reflected after November
16, 2009 and accounted for as a temporary difference, which should have been included in the
determination of deferred taxes at the acquisition date, as part of the Bluegreen purchase price
allocation.
The Companys financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2010 contained herein
reflect the adjustments and revisions described above. See Note 1 of the Notes to Unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about these adjustments. The Company
will present the impact of these adjustments and revisions for the three and six months ended June
30, 2010 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 in future filings when it
discloses them as comparable periods. The quarterly period adjustments and revisions were
previously disclosed in Note 40 to the Companys audited consolidated financial statements included
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
59
Table of Contents
Consolidated Financial Condition
Consolidated Assets and Liabilities
Total assets at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $5.7 billion and $5.8 billion,
respectively. The primary changes in components of total assets are summarized below:
| an increase in BankAtlantic Bancorps interest-bearing deposits in other banks primarily reflecting $200 million of higher cash balances at the Federal Reserve Bank in anticipation of the Tampa branch sale; | ||
| a decrease in securities available for sale reflecting BankAtlantic Bancorps receipts of repayments of short-term agency and municipal securities as well as mortgage-backed securities repayments; | ||
| a decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorps tax certificate balances primarily relating to redemptions; | ||
| an increase in BankAtlantic Bancorps loans held for sale associated with the transfer of $25.1 million of non-performing residential loans to held for sale; | ||
| a decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorps loans receivable balances associated with $28 million of net-charge-offs, $6.7 million of loans transferred to real estate owned, $3.1 million of loan sales, and repayments of loans in the ordinary course of business; and | ||
| a decrease in BankAtlantic Bancorps accrued interest receivables resulting primarily from lower loan and tax certificate balances partially offset by higher agency and municipal securities balances. |
Total liabilities at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $5.5 billion and $5.6 billion,
respectively. The primary changes in components of total liabilities are summarized below:
| a decrease in BankAtlantics interest bearing deposit account balances associated with lower interest bearing checking account and time deposit balances; | ||
| an increase in BankAtlantics non-interest bearing deposits due primarily to higher average balances per customer account; | ||
| lower FHLB advances and short term borrowings at BankAtlantic due to repayments using proceeds from deposit growth; | ||
| the deferred gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary of approximately $11.3 million which was recognized into income upon Core receiving a general release of liability during the three months ended March 31, 2011 (see Note 2 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information); and | ||
| an increase in BankAtlantic Bancorps junior subordinated debentures liability due to interest deferrals. |
60
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
BFC Activities
The BFC Activities segment consists of BFC operations, dividends from our investment in
Benihana, and other operations of Woodbridge. BFC operations primarily consist of our corporate
overhead and general and administrative expenses, including the expenses of Woodbridge, the
financial results of a venture partnership that BFC controls and other equity investments, as well
as income and expenses associated with BFCs shared service operations which provides human
resources, risk management, investor relations and executive office administration services to
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen. This segment also includes investments made by our wholly owned
subsidiary, BFC/CCC, Inc (BFC/CCC). Woodbridges other operations include the activities of Pizza
Fusion Holdings, Inc. (Pizza Fusion) and Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC, as well as certain
other investments.
The discussion that follows reflects the operations and related matters of BFC Activities (in
thousands).
For the Three Months Ended | Change | |||||||||||
March 31, | 2011 vs. | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||||||
(As Revised) | ||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||
Other revenues |
$ | 271 | 387 | (116 | ) | |||||||
271 | 387 | (116 | ) | |||||||||
Cost and Expenses |
||||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,361 | 1,838 | (477 | ) | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
5,376 | 6,487 | (1,111 | ) | ||||||||
6,737 | 8,325 | (1,588 | ) | |||||||||
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates |
1,361 | (31 | ) | 1,392 | ||||||||
Other income |
1,318 | 1,394 | (76 | ) | ||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before income
taxes |
(3,787 | ) | (6,575 | ) | 2,788 | |||||||
Less: Benefit for income taxes |
(144 | ) | (1,167 | ) | 1,023 | |||||||
Net loss |
$ | (3,643 | ) | (5,408 | ) | 1,765 | ||||||
Other revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 related to franchise
revenues generated by Pizza Fusion.
Interest expense totaled $1.4 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in interest expense primarily resulted from lower rates.
No interest was capitalized in the three months ended March 31, 2011 or 2010.
General and administrative expenses decreased $1.1 million to $5.4 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 from $6.5 million for the same period in 2010. The decrease was
attributable to lower employee compensation due to a decrease in the number of employees, and lower
bonuses, as well as lower franchise and contract fees due to Pizza Fusion store closures. This was
offset in part by higher professional fees.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC had a 10% interest in a limited liability company that
owned two commercial properties in Hillsborough County, Florida which served as collateral for an
approximately $26.0 million loan to the limited liability company. In connection with the purchase
of the commercial properties in November 2006, BFC and the unaffiliated member of the limited
liability company each guaranteed the payment of up to a maximum of $5.0 million for certain
environmental indemnities and specific obligations that were not related to the financial
performance of the properties. BFC and the unaffiliated member also entered into a cross
indemnification agreement which limited BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and
its affiliates. On March 25, 2011, the limited liability company reached a settlement with its
lender, pursuant to which it has conveyed the commercial properties securing the loan via a deed in
lieu of foreclosure. BFC and BFC/CCCs wholly-owned subsidiary were released from all obligations
and guarantees related to the two commercial properties. As of March 31, 2011, BFC recognized the
negative basis of its investment of approximately $1.3 million which is included in earnings from
unconsolidated affiliates.
2008 Step acquisitions Purchase Accounting
During 2008, BFC purchased an aggregate of 723,848 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A
Common Stock on the open market. The shares purchased were accounted for as step acquisitions under
the purchase method
61
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
of accounting then in effect. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities acquired were revalued to
reflect market values at the date of acquisition. The discounts and premiums arising as a result of
such revaluation are generally being accreted or amortized, net of tax, over the remaining life of
the assets and liabilities. The net impact of such accretion, amortization and other effects of
purchase accounting decreased our consolidated net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2011
by approximately $160,000 and increased our consolidated net loss for the three months ended March
31, 2010 by approximately $85,000.
BFC Activities- Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments totaling approximately $22 million and $29 million, respectively. The decrease in cash,
cash equivalents and short-term investments was due to BFCs operating and general and
administrative expenses of approximately $3.2 million, and junior subordinated debentures interest
payments of approximately $1.3 million, as well as a $2.5 million payment to the note holder in
connection with a settlement agreement, as discussed below.
Except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Bluegreen and
Woodbridge are not direct obligations of BFC and generally are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the
assets of those entities are not available to BFC, absent a dividend or distribution from those
entities. BFCs principal sources of liquidity are its available cash, including tax refunds,
short-term investments, and dividends from Benihana. We expect to receive an additional $7.5
million tax refund, net of the amounts payable under the settlement agreement related to the
bankruptcy filing of Levitt and Sons LLC and substantially all of its subsidiaries, as discussed in
Note 16 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
We expect to use our available funds to fund operations and meet our obligations. We may also
use available funds to make additional investments in the companies within our consolidated group,
including participation in BankAtlantic Bancorps recently announced rights offering, invest in
equity securities and other investments, or repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our
share repurchase program. On September 21, 2009, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase
program which authorizes the repurchase of up to 20,000,000 shares of Class A and Class B Common
Stock at an aggregate cost of no more than $10 million. The share repurchase program replaced our
$10 million repurchase program that our Board of Directors approved in October 2006 which placed a
limitation on the number of shares which could be repurchased under the program at 1,750,000 shares
of Class A Common Stock. The current program, like the prior program, authorizes management, at its
discretion, to repurchase shares from time to time subject to market conditions and other factors.
No shares were repurchased during the years ended December 31, 2010 or 2009, or during the three
months ended March 31, 2011.
During June and July 2010, BFC acquired an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A Common Stock in connection with the exercise of subscription rights granted to it
in BankAtlantic Bancorps rights offering. The aggregate purchase price for those shares was $15.0
million. BFC exercised its basic subscription rights to purchase 5,986,865 shares, and the
remaining 4,013,135 shares were acquired by BFC pursuant to its over-subscription request. The
shares acquired in the rights offering increased BFCs ownership interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp
by approximately 8% to 45% and BFCs voting interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 5% to
71% as of July 2010. BankAtlantic Bancorp recently announced its intention to pursue a new rights
offering to its shareholders of up to $30 million of its Class A Common Stock. We currently intend
to support the rights offering and have indicated our willingness to participate; however, the
amount of our investment in the rights offering has not yet been determined by our Board of
Directors.
Since March 2009, BFC has not received cash dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic
Bancorp is currently prohibited from paying dividends on its common stock without first receiving
the written non-objection of the OTS. In addition, during February 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp
elected to exercise its right to defer payments of interest on its trust preferred junior
subordinated debt. BankAtlantic Bancorp is permitted to defer quarterly interest payments for up to
20 consecutive quarters. During the deferral period, BankAtlantic Bancorp is prohibited from paying
dividends to its shareholders, including BFC. While BankAtlantic Bancorp can end the deferral
period at any time, BankAtlantic Bancorp has indicated that it anticipates that it may continue to
defer such interest payments for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, BFC has not received cash
dividends from Bluegreen and does not expect to receive cash dividends from Bluegreen in the
foreseeable future. Certain of Bluegreens credit facilities contain terms which may limit the
payment of cash dividends.
We believe that our current financial condition and credit relationships, together with
anticipated cash
62
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
flows from operating activities and other sources of funds, including tax refunds and, to the
extent determined to be advisable, proceeds from the disposition of properties or investments,
will allow us to meet our anticipated near-term liquidity needs. With respect to long-term
liquidity requirements, in addition to the foregoing, we may seek to raise funds, through the
incurrence of long-term secured or unsecured indebtedness, the issuance of equity and/or debt
securities or through the sale of assets; however we may be limited in doing so by OTS restrictions
or otherwise and these alternatives may not be available to us on attractive terms, or at all.
BFC, on a parent company only basis, has committed that it will not, without the prior written
non-objection of the OTS, (i) incur, issue, renew or roll over any current lines of credit,
guarantee the debt of any other entity or otherwise incur any additional debt, except as
contemplated by BFCs business plan or in connection with BankAtlantics compliance requirements
applicable to it; (ii) declare or make any dividends or other capital distributions other than
dividends payable on BFCs currently outstanding preferred stock of approximately $187,500 a
quarter or (iii) enter into any new agreements, contracts or arrangements or materially modify any
existing agreements, contracts or arrangements with BankAtlantic not consistent with past
practices.
On September 21, 2009, BFC and Woodbridge consummated their merger pursuant to which
Woodbridge merged with BFC. In connection with the merger, Dissenting Holders who collectively held
approximately 4.2 million shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock exercised their appraisal
rights and are entitled to receive an amount equal to the fair value of their shares calculated in
accordance with Florida law. The Dissenting Holders have rejected Woodbridges offer of $1.10 per
share and requested payment for their shares based on their respective fair value estimates of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. In December 2009, the Company recorded a $4.6 million liability
with a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in capital representing, in the aggregate,
Woodbridges offer to the Dissenting Holders. However, the appraisal rights litigation is currently
ongoing and its outcome is uncertain. There is no assurance as to the amount of cash that will be
required to be paid to the Dissenting Holders, which amount may be greater than the $4.6 million
that we have accrued.
The Company owns 800,000 shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock, which it purchased
during 2004 for $25.00 per share. The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into Benihanas
Common Stock. Based on the number of currently outstanding shares of Benihanas capital stock, the
Convertible Preferred Stock, if converted, would represent an approximate 19% voting interest and
an approximate 9% economic interest in Benihanas capital stock. The Company receives cumulative
quarterly dividends on its shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock at an annual rate equal
to 5% or $1.25 per share, payable on the last day of each calendar quarter. The Convertible
Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory redemption of $20 million plus accumulated dividends on
July 2, 2014 unless we elect to extend the mandatory redemption date to a date not later than July
2, 2024. Benihana is currently considering strategic alternatives, including a possible sale of the
company. In the event that a sale transaction is consummated at a time when we continue to hold all
800,000 shares of the Convertible Preferred Stock, we would receive a minimum of $20 million in
consideration for our shares of the Convertible Preferred Stock.
On June 21, 2004, the Company sold 15,000 shares of its 5% Preferred Stock to an investor
group in a private offering. The Companys 5% Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 per
share. The shares of 5% Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option of the Company, from time to
time, at redemption prices ranging from $1,025 per share for the year 2011 to $1,000 per share for
the year 2015 and thereafter. The 5% Preferred Stock liquidation preference is equal to its stated
value of $1,000 per share plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends or an amount equal to the
applicable redemption price in a voluntary liquidation or winding up of the Company. Holders of the
5% Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except as provided by Florida law, and are entitled to
receive, when and as declared by the Companys Board of Directors, cumulative quarterly cash
dividends on each such share at a rate per annum of 5% of the stated value from the date of
issuance. Since June 2004, the Company has paid quarterly dividends on the 5% Preferred Stock of
$187,500. On December 17, 2008, the Company amended certain of the previously designated relative
rights, preferences and limitations of the Companys 5% Preferred Stock. The amendment eliminated
the right of the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock to convert their shares of Preferred Stock into
shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock. The amendment also requires the Company to redeem
shares of the 5% Preferred Stock with the net proceeds it receives in the event (i) the Company
sells any of its shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock, (ii) the Company sells any
shares of Benihanas Common Stock received upon conversion of Benihanas Convertible Preferred
Stock or (iii) Benihana redeems any shares of its Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Company.
Additionally, in the event the Company defaults on its obligation to make dividend payments on its
5% Preferred Stock, the amendment entitles the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock, in place of the
Company, to receive directly from Benihana certain payments on the shares of
63
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Company or on the shares of Benihanas
Common Stock received by the Company upon conversion of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock.
The development activities at Carolina Oak which is within Tradition Hilton Head, were
suspended in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of, among other things, an overall softening of
demand for new homes and a decline in the overall economy. In 2009, the housing industry continued
to face significant challenges and Woodbridge made the decision to cease all activities at Carolina
Oak. Woodbridge was the obligor under a $37.2 million loan that was collateralized by the Carolina
Oak property. Effective April 26, 2011, Woodbridge and Carolina Oak entered into a settlement
agreement with the holder of the $37.2 million secured note to resolve the disputes and litigation
between them. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, (i) Woodbridge paid $2.5 million to the
note holder, (ii) Carolina Oak conveyed to the note holder the real property securing the loan and
(iii) the note holder agreed not to pursue certain remedies, including a deficiency judgment, and
after the expiration of an agreed-upon time, agreed to fully release Woodbridge and Carolina Oak,
in each case subject to certain conditions. At March 31, 2011, the carrying amount of Carolina
Oaks inventory was approximately $10.8 million.
During June 2008, Woodbridge entered into a settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement)
with the Debtors and the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in the Chapter 11 Cases
(the Joint Committee). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, as it was subsequently amended,
Woodbridge agreed to (i) pay $8 million to the Debtors bankruptcy estates (sometimes referred to
herein as the Debtors Estate), (ii) place $4.5 million in a release fund to be disbursed to
third party creditors in exchange for a third party release and injunction, (iii) make a $300,000
payment to a deposit holders fund and (iv) share a percentage of any tax refund attributable to
periods prior to the bankruptcy with the Debtors Estate. In addition, Woodbridge agreed to waive
and release substantially all of the claims it had against the Debtors, including administrative
expense claims through July 2008, and the Debtors (joined by the Joint Committee) agreed to waive
and release any claims they had against Woodbridge and its affiliates. On February 20, 2009, the
Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and
Sons and the Joint Committee. That order also approved the settlement pursuant to the Settlement
Agreement, as amended. The Companys liability related to the Settlement Agreement at each of March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately $11.7 million, representing the portion of tax
refunds that will likely be required to be shared with the Debtors Estate pursuant to the
Settlement Agreement. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $8.4 million of such $11.7
million portion of the tax refund to be paid to the Debtors Estate was received and placed in an
escrow account. The $8.4 million amount is included as restricted cash in the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
At June 30, 2009, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC had a 10% interest in a limited
partnership as a non-managing general partner. The partnership owns an office building located in
Boca Raton, Florida. In connection with the purchase of the office building in March 2006, BFC/CCC
guaranteed repayment of a portion of the non-recourse loan on the property on a joint and several
basis with the managing general partner. BFC/CCCs maximum exposure under this guarantee agreement
was $2.0 million (which was shared on a joint and several basis with the managing general partner).
In July 2009, BFC/CCCs wholly-owned subsidiary withdrew as a partner of the limited partnership
and transferred its 10% interest to an unaffiliated partner. In return, the partner to whom this
interest was assigned agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the release of BFC/CCC
from the guarantee. The partner was unable to secure such a release and that partner has agreed to
indemnify BFC/CCCs wholly-owned subsidiary for any losses that may arise under the guarantee after
the date of the assignment. No amounts are recorded in our financial statements at March 31, 2011
or December 31, 2010 for this joint venture.
As described above, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC had a 10% interest in a limited
liability company that owned two commercial properties in Hillsborough County, Florida. On March
25, 2011, the limited liability company reached a settlement with its lender and conveyed the
commercial properties securing the loan via a deed in lieu of foreclosure. BFC and BFC/CCCs
wholly-owned subsidiary were released from all obligations and guarantees related to the two
commercial properties. As of March 31, 2011, BFC recognized the negative basis of its investment
of approximately $1.3 million which is included in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 50% limited partner interest in a limited
partnership that has a 10% interest in a limited liability company that owns an office building in
Tampa, Florida. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying amount of this investment was
approximately $278,000 and $282,000, respectively, which is included in investments in
unconsolidated affiliates in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. In
connection with the purchase of the office building by the limited liability company in June 2007,
BFC guaranteed the payment of certain environmental indemnities and specific obligations that are
not related to the financial performance of the asset up to a maximum of $15.0 million, or $25.0
million in
64
Table of Contents
BFC Activities
the event of any petition or involuntary proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or similar
state insolvency laws or in the event of any transfer of interests not in accordance with the loan
documents. BFC and the unaffiliated members also entered into a cross indemnification agreement
which limits BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates. No amounts
are recorded in the Companys financial statements at March 31, 2011 or December 31, 2010 for the
obligations associated with this guarantee based on the potential indemnification by unaffiliated
members and the limit of the specific obligations to non-financial matters.
65
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Real Estate Operations Segment
The Real Estate Operations segment includes the subsidiaries through which Woodbridge
historically conducted its real estate business activities. These activities were concentrated in
Florida and South Carolina and included the development and sale of land, the construction and sale
of single family homes and townhomes and the leasing of commercial properties through Core prior to
its liquidation in 2010 and Carolina Oak, which was engaged in homebuilding activities in South
Carolina prior to the suspension of those activities in the fourth quarter of 2008. The Real Estate
Operations segment also includes the operations of Cypress Creek Holdings, which engages in leasing
activities.
Real Estate Operations
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||
(As Revised) | ||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||
Other revenues |
$ | 17 | 637 | (620 | ) | |||||||
17 | 637 | (620 | ) | |||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
1,402 | 3,310 | (1,908 | ) | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
489 | 2,659 | (2,170 | ) | ||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
1,891 | 5,969 | (4,078 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary |
11,305 | | 11,305 | |||||||||
Interest income and other income |
| 53 | (53 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
9,431 | (5,279 | ) | 14,710 | ||||||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
| | | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of
taxes |
9,431 | (5,279 | ) | 14,710 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
| (249 | ) | 249 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 9,431 | (5,528 | ) | 14,959 | |||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to the Same 2010 Period
Other revenues decreased to $17,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to
$637,000 for the same period in 2010. Other revenues recognized for the three months ended March
31, 2010 primarily consisted of rental income from a tenant whose lease agreement expired in March
2010. Additionally for the same period, other revenues included irrigation revenue earned at one
of the five subsidiaries whose membership interests were pledged as additional collateral in the
debt settlement agreement with one of Cores lenders.
Interest expense decreased to $1.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared
to $3.3 million for the same period in 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the release of
approximately $112.30 million of debt as part of Cores settlement agreement with its lenders.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $489,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 from $2.7 million for the same period in 2010. The decrease was primarily a result
of the cessation of operations at Core and Carolina Oak.
Gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary of $11.3 million is attributable to the
deconsolidation of five of Cores subsidiaries, the membership interests in which were transferred
to the lender upon settlement of $86.7 million in debt.
66
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Real Estate Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Core had cash and cash equivalents of $245,000 and
$1.0 million, respectively.
During 2010, demand for residential and commercial inventory showed no signs of recovery,
particularly in the geographic regions where Cores properties were located. In early 2010,
Woodbridge made the decision to pursue an orderly liquidation of Core and worked cooperatively with
the various lenders to achieve that objective. During November 2010, Core entered into a
settlement agreement with one of its lenders, which had previously commenced actions seeking
foreclosure of mortgage loans totaling approximately $113.9 million collateralized by property in
Florida and South Carolina. Under the terms of the agreement, Core pledged additional collateral to
the lender consisting of membership interests in five of Cores subsidiaries and granted security
interests in the acreage owned by such subsidiaries in Port St. Lucie, Florida, substantially all
of which is undeveloped raw land. Core also agreed to an amendment of the complaint related to the
Florida foreclosure action to include this additional collateral and an entry into consensual
judgments of foreclosure in both the Florida and South Carolina foreclosure actions. In
consideration therefore, the lender agreed not to enforce a deficiency judgment against Core and,
in February 2011, released Core from any other claims arising from or relating to the loans. As of
November 30, 2010, Core deconsolidated the five subsidiaries, the membership interests in which
were transferred to the lender upon entry into the consensual judgments of foreclosure. In
connection therewith, and in accordance with the accounting guidance for consolidation, the Company
recorded a guarantee obligation deferred gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary of $11.3
million in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2010.
Core received its general release of liability, and accordingly the deferred gain on settlement of
investment in subsidiary was recognized into income, during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Approximately $27.2 million of the $113.9 million of mortgage loans described above is
collateralized by property in South Carolina which had an estimated carrying value of approximately
$19.4 million at March 31, 2011. This property is subject to separate foreclosure proceedings which
are not expected to begin until later in the first half of 2011. While Core was released by the
lender from any other claims relating to the loans, the applicable accounting guidance requires
that the $27.2 million of debt and associated $19.4 million of collateral remain in Cores
financial statements until the foreclosure proceedings have been completed.
In December 2010, Core and one of its subsidiaries entered into agreements, including without
limitation, a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreement, with one of their lenders which resolved the
foreclosure proceedings commenced by the lender related to property at Tradition Hilton Head which
served as collateral for a $25 million loan. Pursuant to the agreements, Cores subsidiary
transferred to the lender all of its right, title and interest in and to the property which served
as collateral for the loan as well as certain additional real and personal property. In
consideration therefore, the lender released Core and its subsidiary from any claims arising from
or relating to the loan. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, this transaction was
accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring and accordingly, a $13.0 million gain on debt
extinguishment was recognized in December 2010.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our Real Estate and Other contractual obligations (excluding
Bluegreen) as of March 31, 2011 (in thousands):
Less than 12 | 13-36 | 37-60 | More than | |||||||||||||||||
Category (1) | Total | months | Months | Months | 60 Months | |||||||||||||||
Long Term Debt Obligations(2) |
$ | 160,805 | 64,657 | 510 | 10,586 | 85,052 | ||||||||||||||
Operating Lease Obligations |
159 | 68 | 72 | 19 | | |||||||||||||||
Total Obligations |
$ | 160,964 | 64,725 | 582 | 10,605 | 85,052 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Long-term debt obligations consist of notes, mortgage notes and bonds payable and junior subordinated debentures. Operating lease obligations consist of lease commitments. The timing of contractual payments for debt obligations assumes the exercise of all extensions available at our sole discretion. Long-term debt obligations and long-term debt obligations include defaulted loans totaling approximately $64.4 million as of March 31, 2011 of which repayment of the outstanding debt was accelerated by the lender and is currently being shown as immediately due and payable in less than 12 months. | |
(2) | These amounts include scheduled principal payments. |
67
Table of Contents
Real Estate
In addition to the above contractual obligations, we have $2.4 million in unrecognized
tax benefits in accordance with accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes, which provides
guidance for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial
statements uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take on a tax return.
Levitt and Sons, Woodbridges former wholly-owned homebuilding subsidiary, had approximately
$33.3 million of surety bonds related to its ongoing projects at November 9, 2007, the date on
which Levitt and Sons and substantially all of its subsidiaries filed voluntary bankruptcy
petitions (the Chapter 11 Cases). In the event that these obligations are drawn and paid by the
surety, Woodbridge could be responsible for up to $7.6 million plus costs and expenses in
accordance with the surety indemnity agreements executed by Woodbridge. At March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, Woodbridge had $490,000 in surety bond accruals related to certain bonds where
management believes it to be probable that Woodbridge will be required to reimburse the surety
under applicable indemnity agreements. It is unclear whether and to what extent the remaining
outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be
responsible for additional amounts beyond the previous accrued amount. Woodbridge will not receive
any repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery of any amounts it may be required to pay.
In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require Woodbridge to post collateral against a
portion of surety bond exposure in connection with demands made by a municipality. Based on claims
by the municipality on the bonds, the surety requested that Woodbridge post a $4.0 million escrow
deposit while the matter was being litigated with the municipality and while Woodbridge did not
believe that the municipality had the right to demand payment under
the bonds, Woodbridge complied
with that request. In August 2010, a motion for summary judgment was entered in Woodbridges favor
terminating any obligations under the bonds. The municipality has appealed the decision.
68
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreen
The Companys consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
include the results of operations of Bluegreen. Bluegreens results of operations are reported
through two reportable segments, which are Bluegreen Resorts and Bluegreen Communities. Bluegreen
is a separate public company, and the following discussion is derived from or includes disclosure
prepared by Bluegreens management and included in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011. Accordingly, unless noted to the contrary or the context otherwise
requires, references to the Company, we, us or our in the following discussion are
references to Bluegreen and its subsidiaries, and are not references to BFC.
Bluegreens results for the first quarter of 2011 reflect its continued focus on fee-based
service business and its efforts to achieve selling and marketing efficiencies in its Bluegreen
Resorts segment.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011
| Bluegreen generated free cash flow (cash flow from operating and investing activities) of $34.0 million. | ||
| VOI system-wide sales, which include sales of third-party developer inventory, totaled $58.5 million, reflecting a 6% increase over the three months ended March 31, 2010. | ||
| Bluegreens sales and marketing fee-based service business sold $16.9 million of third-party developer inventory and earned sales and marketing commissions of $10.8 million. Including Bluegreens resort management, resort title, construction management and other operations, Bluegreens total resort fee-based services revenues were $28.0 million, a 7% increase over the three months ended March 31, 2010. | ||
| Bluegreen Communities business continues to experience low consumer demand for its homesites. On March 24, 2011, Bluegreen announced that it had engaged advisors to explore strategic alternatives for Bluegreen Communities, including a possible sale of the division. | ||
| Bluegreen entered into a new sales and marketing fee-based agreement with the Manhattan Club in New York City. |
Bluegreen believes its fee-based service business enables Bluegreen to leverage its
management, sales and marketing, mortgage servicing, title and construction experience to generate
recurring revenues from third parties. Bluegreens provision of these services requires
significantly less capital investment than its traditional vacation ownership business. During the
first quarters of 2011 and 2010, Bluegreen sold $16.9 million and $15.8 million, respectively, of
third-party inventory and earned sales and marketing commissions of approximately $10.8 million
and$10.2 million, respectively. Based on an allocation of its selling, marketing and segment
general and administrative expenses to these sales, Bluegreen believes it generated approximately
$1.1 million and $0.9 million pre-tax profits by providing these sales and marketing fee-based
services during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In addition to the
sales and marketing of third-party VOIs, Bluegreen also generated fee-based income by providing
resort and reservation management services, title services, construction consulting services (where
Bluegreen manages the construction, design and development of vacation ownership resorts for third
parties), and mortgage servicing of the VOI notes originated from the sales of certain of the
third-party VOIs. Bluegreens goal is for fee-based services to become an increasing portion of its
resorts business over time; however, its efforts to do so may not be successful.
Additionally, consistent with Bluegreens initiatives to improve liquidity, during the first
quarter of 2011, Bluegreen continued to focus on entering into VOI sales that are 100% cash and
encouraging larger down payments on financed sales. Including down payments received on financed
sales, 59% of Bluegreens sales were realized in cash within approximately 30 days from the
contract date during the first quarter of 2011. Refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources section
below for additional information.
On March 24, 2011, Bluegreen announced that it had engaged advisors to explore strategic
alternatives for Bluegreen Communities, including a possible sale of the division. However,
Bluegreen may not elect to pursue any of the strategic alternatives it may consider, and any such
alternatives, if pursued, may not ultimately be consummated, or, if consummated may not result in
improvements to Bluegreens financial condition and operating results or otherwise achieve the
benefits Bluegreen expects to realize from the transaction. In addition, it is possible that
Bluegreens announcement regarding strategic alternatives may have a material adverse effect on
Bluegreen Communities operations. In the event that adverse conditions in the real estate market
continue or deteriorate further, the carrying value of Bluegreen Communities inventory would be
reevaluated and could result in additional impairment charges. Impairment charges may also be
required to the extent that additional market information obtained during the strategic review
process indicates that the carrying value of Bluegreen Communities inventory exceeds its fair
value. Any such impairment charges may be material.
69
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreen has historically experienced and expects to continue to experience seasonal
fluctuations in its gross revenues and results of operations. This seasonality may result in
fluctuations in Bluegreen quarterly operating results. Although Bluegreen typically sees more
potential customers at its sales offices during the quarters ending in June and September, ultimate
recognition of the resulting sales during these periods may be delayed due to down payment
requirements for recognition of real estate sales under GAAP or due to the timing of development
and the requirement that Bluegreen uses the percentage-of-completion method of accounting.
Bluegreen Segments Financial Results
The following tables include the financial results of Bluegreens segments for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Bluegreen Resorts
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Percentage | Percentage | |||||||||||||||
Amount | of Sale | Amount | of Sale | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) (as revised) | ||||||||||||||||
System-wide sales (1) |
$ | 58,474 | 47,628 | |||||||||||||
Changes in sales deferred under
timeshare accounting rules |
(516 | ) | (2,497 | ) | ||||||||||||
Estimated uncollectible VOI notes
receivable |
(4,714 | ) | (4,310 | ) | ||||||||||||
System-wide sales, net |
53,244 | 100 | % | 40,821 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
Less: Sales of third party VOIs |
(16,910 | ) | -32 | % | (15,754 | ) | -39 | % | ||||||||
Adjustment to allowance for
loan losses |
| | (461 | ) | -1 | % | ||||||||||
Sales of real estate |
36,334 | 68 | % | 24,606 | 60 | % | ||||||||||
Cost of real estate sales (2) |
(7,225 | ) | -20 | % | (2,735 | ) | -11 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit |
29,109 | 80 | % | 21,871 | 89 | % | ||||||||||
Fee-based sales commission |
10,764 | 20 | % | 10,180 | 25 | % | ||||||||||
Other resort fee-based services revenue |
17,200 | 32 | % | 15,670 | 38 | % | ||||||||||
Cost of other resort fee-based services |
(13,081 | ) | -25 | % | (11,943 | ) | -29 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses |
(28,529 | ) | -54 | % | (27,383 | ) | -67 | % | ||||||||
Segment general and administrative
expenses (3) |
(4,001 | ) | -8 | % | (2,049 | ) | -5 | % | ||||||||
Segment operating profit |
$ | 11,462 | 22 | % | 6,346 | 16 | % | |||||||||
70
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Bluegreen Communities
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Percentage | Percentage | |||||||||||||||
Amount | of Sale | Amount | of Sale | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Gross sales of real estate |
$ | 4,049 | 3,382 | |||||||||||||
Changes in sales deferred
under timeshare
accounting rules |
1,240 | (136 | ) | |||||||||||||
Sales of real estate |
5,289 | 100 | % | 3,246 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
Cost of real estate sales (2) |
(2,450 | ) | -46 | % | (5,368 | ) | -165 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit |
2,839 | 54 | % | (2,122 | ) | -65 | % | |||||||||
Other operations revenues |
434 | 8 | % | 351 | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Cost of other operations |
(886 | ) | -17 | % | (747 | ) | -23 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses |
(1,093 | ) | -21 | % | (1,021 | ) | -31 | % | ||||||||
Segment general and
administrative expenses (3) |
(1,314 | ) | -25 | % | (1,603 | ) | -49 | % | ||||||||
Segment operating loss |
$ | (20 | ) | 0 | % | (5,142 | ) | -158 | % | |||||||
(1) | Includes sales of VOIs made on behalf of third parties, which are transacted through the same process as the sale of Bluegreens VOI inventory. | |
(2) | Percentages for cost of sales and gross profit are calculated as a percentage of sales of real estate. | |
(3) | General and administrative expenses attributable to corporate overhead have been excluded from the tables. Corporate general and administrative expenses (excluding mortgage operations) totaled $10.6 million and $12.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. (See Corporate General and Administrative Expenses below for further discussion. |
Bluegreen Resorts
Bluegreen Resorts Resort Sales and Marketing
The following table sets forth certain information for sales of both Bluegreen VOIs and VOI
sales made on behalf of third-party for a fee for the periods indicated. The information is
provided before giving effect to the deferral of Bluegreen VOI sales in accordance with timeshare
accounting rules:
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Number of sales offices at period end |
20 | 21 | ||||||
Number of Bluegreen VOI sales transactions |
3,522 | 3,478 | ||||||
Number of sales made on behalf of third-party
developers for a fee |
1,366 | 1,317 | ||||||
Total VOI sales transactions |
4,888 | 4,795 | ||||||
Average sales price per transaction |
$ | 12,106 | $ | 11,712 | ||||
Number of total prospects tours |
32,284 | 29,553 | ||||||
Sale-to-tour conversion ratio total prospects |
15.1 | % | 16.2 | % | ||||
Number of new prospects tours |
17,800 | 15,408 | ||||||
Sale-to-tour conversion ratio new prospects |
11.4 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||
Percentage of sales to owners |
59.3 | % | 61.9 | % |
Sales of Real Estate. Sales of real estate for Bluegreen Resorts were $29.1 and $21.9 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Sales of real estate for
Bluegreen Resorts represents sales of
Bluegreen-owned VOIs, as adjusted by changes in sales deferred under timeshare accounting rules,
the impact of
71
Table of Contents
Real Estate
estimated uncollectible VOI notes receivable on new loan originations, and
adjustments, if any, to allowance for loan losses of existing VOI loans, as further described
below.
VOI revenue is reduced by our estimate of future uncollectible VOI notes receivable. Estimated
losses for uncollectible VOI notes receivable vary with the amount of financed sales during the
period and changes in its estimates of future note receivable performance for newly originated
loans and the future performance of our existing loan portfolio. During the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, we reduced revenue by $4.7 million and $4.3 million, respectively, for the
estimated future uncollectibles on loans originated in these periods.
Cost of Real Estate Sales. Bluegreen Resorts cost of sales was $7.2 million and $2.7 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Included in the cost of real
estate sales in March 2010 is $2.9 million of cost of real estate sales related to recognition of
deferred revenue. Cost of sales of real estate varies between periods based on the sales volumes,
the relative costs of the specific VOIs sold in each respective period and the size of the point
package of the VOIs sold.
Fee-Based Sales Commission Revenue. Bluegreen earns commissions for the sales of third-party
inventory upon the closing of the respective sales transaction.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we sold $16.9 million and $15.8 million,
respectively, of third-party developer inventory and earned sales and marketing commissions of
$10.8 million and $10.2 million, respectively. We anticipate that fee-based services will be a
greater portion of our revenues in the future although our efforts in this respect may not be
successful.
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Selling and marketing expenses for Bluegreen Resorts were $28.5
million and $27.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of sales fluctuate due to the mix of marketing
programs and incentives, lower commission costs, as well as average sales price. During the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the average sales price
was $12,106 and $11,712, respectively, and such increase also contributed to the decrease in Bluegreens selling and
marketing expense as a percentage of sales.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for Bluegreen Resorts were
$4.0 million and $2.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Resort Management and Other Services
The following table sets forth pre-tax profit generated by Bluegreens resort management and
other services (in thousands):
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Resort management operations |
$ | 6,714 | 5,821 | |||||
Title operations |
1,626 | 1,471 | ||||||
Other |
(79 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||
Total fee-based service profit |
8,261 | 7,278 | ||||||
Net carrying cost of developer inventory |
(4,142 | ) | (3,551 | ) | ||||
Total profit |
$ | 4,119 | 3,727 | |||||
Other Resort Fee-Based Services Revenue. Bluegreens other resort fee-based services revenue
consists primarily of fees earned for providing management services and fees earned for providing
title services in connection with VOI transactions. In exchange for
fess, we provided management
services to the Bluegreen Vacation Club and to a majority of the property owners associations of
our resorts. In connection with our management services provided to the Bluegreen Vacation Club, we
manage the club reservation system, and provide owner services as well as billing and collections
services.
Revenues generated by other resort fee-based services were $17.2 million and $15.7 million during
the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Revenues related to other resort
fee-based services increased in 2011 as a result of additional fees earned by providing services to
more VOI owners and from managing more timeshare
resorts on behalf of property owners associations. As of March 31, 2011, we managed 42 timeshare
resort properties and hotels compared to 40 as of March 31, 2010. Additionally, our revenues
related to title services
72
Table of Contents
Real Estate
increased due to the increase in the number of system-wide VOI sales
transactions.
Cost of Other Resort Fee-Based Services. Cost of other resort fee-based services was $13.1 million
and $11.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The
increase in the cost during 2011 is due to the additional service volumes described above. The net
carrying cost of our unsold inventory fluctuates with the number of VOIs we own and the number of
resorts subject to developer subsidy arrangements, as well as proceeds from rental and sampler
activity. During the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, the carrying cost of our inventory was $6.8
million and $5.8 million, respectively, and was offset by rental and sampler revenues, net of
expenses, of $2.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
Bluegreen Communities
On March 24, 2011, Bluegreen announced that it had engaged advisors to explore strategic
alternatives for Bluegreen Communities, including a possible sale of the division. However,
Bluegreen may elect not to pursue any of the strategic alternatives it may consider when expected
or at all, and any such alternatives, if pursued and ultimately consummated, may not result in
improvements to Bluegreen financial condition and operating results or otherwise achieve the
benefits Bluegreen expects to realize from the transaction. In addition, it is possible that
Bluegreens announcement regarding strategic alternatives may have a material adverse effect on its
Bluegreen Communities operations. In the event that adverse conditions in the real estate market
continue to deteriorate further, the carrying value of Bluegreen Communities inventory would be
reevaluated and could result in additional impairment charges. Impairment charges may also be
required to the extent that additional market information obtained during the strategic review
process indicates that the carrying value of Bluegreen Communities inventory exceeds its fair
value. Any such impairment charges may be material.
Sales of Real Estate. Sales of real estate for Bluegreen Communities were $5.3 million and $3.2
million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the first
quarter of 2011, we substantially completed development in one of the phases of our Vintage Oaks at
the Vineyard community, located in New Braunfels, Texas, which resulted in the recognition of $1.2
million of revenue that was previously deferred in accordance with the percentage-of-completion
method of accounting. During the first quarter of 2010, the impact of the percentage-of-completion
method of accounting did not have a significant impact on revenue. Excluding the impact of the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting from both periods, Bluegreen Communities sales
decreased by $0.6 million or 19% during the first quarter of 2011 as compared to the first quarter
of 2010. Sales at Bluegreen Communities continue to be adversely impacted by the weak residential
real estate market.
The table below sets forth the number of homesites sold by Bluegreen Communities and the average
sales price per homesite for the period indicated, before giving effect to the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting, and excluding sales of bulk parcels:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Number of homesites sold |
46 | 66 | ||||||
Average sales price per homesite |
$ | 67,095 | 58,191 |
The average sales price per homesite increased by $8,904 or 15% during the first quarter of 2011,
compared to the first quarter of 2010, reflecting a higher percentage of sales of higher-priced
homesites at our Vintage Oaks at the Vineyard community.
Cost of Real Estate Sales. Bluegreen Communities cost of real estate sales was $2.4 million and
$5.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the first
quarter of 2010, we recorded non-cash charges to cost of real estate sales of $3.0 million to
write-down the inventory balances of certain phases of our completed properties to their estimated
net realizable value. Variations in cost structures and the market pricing of homesites available
for sale as well as the opening of phases of projects, which include premium homesites (e.g.,
water, frontage, preferred views, larger acreage homesites, etc.), also impact the gross margin of
Bluegreen Communities from period to period.
Other Operations Revenues and Cost. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
Bluegreen Communities other operations revenues were $0.4 million in both periods and the
associated cost of other revenues was $0.9 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Other
operations of Bluegreen Communities business include the
73
Table of Contents
Real Estate
operation of two daily fee golf courses.
Bluegreens golf courses have historically generated operating losses as they are still in their
early years of operations and are located within relatively new communities while the associated
operating expenses and maintenance costs are fixed.
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Bluegreen Communities total selling and marketing expenses during
the first quarter of 2011 were substantially at the same level with the expenses incurred during
the first quarter of 2010.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for Bluegreen Communities
were $1.3 million and $1.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
Interest Income and Interest Expense
Notes Receivable Portfolio. As of March 31, 2011, Bluegreens net interest spread from its notes
receivable portfolio included the interest earned $682.0 million of notes receivable, net of
interest expense incurred on $538.7 million of related receivable-backed debt. The following table
details the sources of income and related expenses associated with our notes receivable portfolio
(in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||
VOI notes receivable |
$ | 22,371 | 24,169 | |||||
Other |
62 | 45 | ||||||
Total interest income |
22,433 | 24,214 | ||||||
Servicing fee income |
||||||||
Fee-based services |
93 | 13 | ||||||
Total income |
22,526 | 24,227 | ||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Receivable-backed notes payable |
10,942 | 11,736 | ||||||
Cost of mortgage servicing operations |
998 | 730 | ||||||
Total expense |
11,940 | 12,466 | ||||||
Net interest on notes receivable portfolio |
$ | 10,586 | 11,761 | |||||
Interest Income. Interest income was $22.4 million and $24.2 million during the first
quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in interest income during the first quarter
of 2011 compared to 2010 is a result of the continued decrease in our VOI notes receivable
portfolio, a result of both the maturing of the portfolio as well as our efforts to increase cash
sales and higher down payments on those VOI sales that we do finance. We expect that our notes
receivable portfolio will continue to decrease in the near term as more VOI sales are realized as
cash.
Interest Expense. Interest expense on receivable-backed notes payable was $10.9 million
and $11.7 million for the first quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Bluegreens other
interest expense, which is primarily comprised of interest on lines of credit and notes payable and
on its subordinated debentures, was $4.0 million and $3.6 million during the first quarters of 2011
and 2010 respectively. Bluegreens effective cost of borrowing was 7.65% and 7.25% during the
first quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Mortgage Servicing Operations. Bluegreens mortgage servicing operations include processing
payments, and collection of notes receivable owned by Bluegreen, as well as on notes receivable
owned by third parties. In
addition, Bluegreens mortgage servicing operations facilitate the monetization of its VOI notes
receivable through its various credit facilities, as well as perform monthly reporting activities
for Bluegreens lenders and receivable investors. The cost of Bluegreens servicing operations was
$0.9 million and $1.0 million during the first quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The servicing fee income represents mortgage servicing fees earned for servicing the loan portfolio
of a third-party developer in connection with one of Bluegreens fee-based services arrangements.
As of March 31, 2011, the total amount of notes receivable serviced by Bluegreen under this
arrangement was $25.2 million. In April 2011, Bluegreen began providing mortgage servicing to
another third party developer for whom Bluegreen also provides fee-based selling and marketing
services.
Corporate General and Administrative Expenses. Bluegreens corporate general and
administrative expenses
74
Table of Contents
Real Estate
consist primarily of expenses associated with administering the various
support functions at Bluegreens corporate headquarters, including accounting, human resources,
information technology, treasury, and legal. Overall corporate and general administrative costs
may fluctuate between periods for various reasons, including but not limited to the timing of
professional services and litigation expenses. In addition, consistent with Bluegreens segment
reporting treatment, changes in the accrued payroll between reporting periods for the entire
company are recorded as corporate general and administrative expense.
Corporate general and administrative expenses were $10.6 million and $12.9 million for the first
quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The $2.3 million, or 18%, decrease during the first
quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of 2010 primarily relates to lower litigation costs
and lower costs incurred for management consulting services.
For a discussion of field selling, general and administrative expenses, see discussion above.
Non-controlling Interest in Income of Consolidated Subsidiary. We include the results of
operations and financial position of Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations, LLC, our 51%-owned subsidiary,
in our consolidated financial statements. The non-controlling interests in income of consolidated
subsidiary is the portion of our consolidated pre-tax income that is attributable to Big Cedar,
LLC, the unaffiliated 49% interest holder in Bluegreen/Big Cedar Vacations, LLC. Non-controlling
interest in income of consolidated subsidiary was $1.7 million and $1.6 million for the first
quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Provision (benefit) for Income Taxes. Bluegreens effective income tax rate was approximately 40%
and 42% during the first quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Bluegreens quarterly effective
income tax rates are based upon Bluegreens current estimated annual rate. Bluegreens annual
effective income tax rate varies based upon its taxable earnings as well as on its mix of taxable
earnings in the various states in which Bluegreen operates.
Bluegreens Liquidity and Capital Resources
Bluegreens primary sources of funds from internal operations are: (i) cash sales, (ii) down
payments on homesite and VOI sales which are financed, (iii) proceeds from the sale of, or
borrowings collateralized by, notes receivable, including cash received from our residual interests
in such transactions, (iv) cash from our finance operations, including mortgage servicing fees and
principal and interest payments received on the purchase money mortgage loans arising from sales of
VOIs and homesites, and (v) net cash generated from our sales and marketing fee-based services and
other resort fee-based services, including our resorts management operations.
As a result of initiatives implemented in the fourth quarter of 2008, we have in recent years
realized higher down payments and a higher percentage of cash sales in connection with VOI sales
compared to prior years. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, including down payments received
on financed sales, 59% of our VOI sales were paid in cash within approximately 30 days from the
contract date.
While the vacation ownership business has historically been capital intensive, our principal goals
in the current environment has been to emphasize the generation of free cash flow (defined as
cash flow from operating and investing activities) by i) incentivizing our sales associates to
generate higher percentages of our sales in cash compared to historical levels; ii) maintaining
sales volumes that allow us to focus on what we believe to be the most efficient marketing channels
available to us; iii) minimizing capital and inventory expenditures; and iv) utilizing our sales
and marketing, mortgage servicing, resort management services, title and construction expertise to
pursue fee-based-service business relationships that require minimal up-front capital investment
and have the potential to
produce strong cash flows for us.
Historically, our business model has depended on the availability of credit in the commercial
markets. VOI sales are generally dependent upon us providing financing to our buyers. Our ability
to sell and/or borrow against our notes receivable from VOI buyers has been a critical factor in
our continued liquidity. When we sell VOIs, a financed buyer is only required to pay a minimum of
10% to 20% of the purchase price in cash at the time of sale; however, selling, marketing, and
administrative expenses attributable to the sale are primarily cash expenses that generally exceed
the buyers minimum required down-payment. Accordingly, having financing facilities available for
the hypothecation, sale, or transfer of these VOI receivables has been a critical factor in our
ability to meet our short and long-term cash needs and we have attempted to diversify our sources
of such financing facilities. Historically, we have relied on our ability to sell receivables in
the term securitization market in order to generate liquidity and create capacity in our receivable
facilities. In addition, maintaining adequate VOI inventory to sell and pursue growth into
75
Table of Contents
Real Estate
new
markets has historically required us to incur debt for the acquisition, construction and
development of new resorts. Although we believe that we currently have adequate completed VOIs in
inventory to satisfy our needs for the next several years, and therefore, expect acquisition and
development expenditures to remain at current levels in the near term, we may decide to acquire or
develop more inventory in the future, which would increase our acquisition and development
expenditures and may require us to incur additional debt.
The challenging credit markets have negatively impacted our financing activities in the past
several years. While the credit markets appear to be recovering and we consummated term
securitizations and entered into new financing facilities during 2010 and the first quarter of
2011, the number of banks and other finance companies willing to provide warehouse lines of
credit for timeshare receivables has decreased. As a result, we may not be able to renew our
existing receivable-backed lines of credit when their current advance periods expire or secure new
future financing for our VOI notes receivable on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, the
securitization market has become unavailable for extended periods of time in the past and may
become unavailable to us in the future.
Further, while we may seek to raise additional debt or equity financing in the future to fund
operations or repay outstanding debt, such financing may not be available to us on favorable terms
or at all. If our efforts are unsuccessful, our liquidity would be significantly adversely
impacted. In light of the current trading price of our common stock, financing involving the
issuance of our common stock or securities convertible into our common stock would be highly
dilutive to our existing shareholders.
Our levels of debt and debt service requirements have several important effects on our operations,
including the following: (i) our significant debt service cash requirements reduce the funds
available for operations and future business opportunities and increases our vulnerability to
adverse economic and industry conditions, as well as conditions in the credit markets, generally;
(ii) our leverage position increases our vulnerability to economic and competitive pressures; (iii)
the financial covenants and other restrictions contained in indentures, credit agreements and other
agreements relating to our indebtedness require us to meet certain financial tests and restrict our
ability to, among other things, borrow additional funds, dispose of assets, make investments, or
pay cash dividends on or repurchase common stock; and (iv) our leverage position may limit funds
available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate purposes.
Certain of our financing arrangements materially limit our ability to pay cash dividends on our
common stock or our ability to repurchase shares in the near term. Certain of our competitors
operate on a less leveraged basis and have greater operating and financial flexibility than we do.
Credit Facilities
The following is a discussion of our material purchase and credit facilities, including those that
were important sources of our liquidity as of March 31, 2011. These facilities do not constitute
all of our outstanding indebtedness as of March 31, 2011. Our other indebtedness includes
outstanding junior subordinated debentures, borrowings collateralized by real estate inventories
that were not incurred pursuant to a significant credit facility, and capital leases.
Credit Facilities for Bluegreen Receivables with Future Availability
Bluegreen maintains various credit facilities with financial institutions that provide receivable
financing for our operations. We had the following credit facilities with future availability as
of March 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
Outstanding | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Advance Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Borrowing | as of March | Availability as of | Expiration; | Borrowing Rate; Rate | ||||||||||||||||
Limit | 31, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | Borrowing Maturity | as of March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
BB&T Purchase Facility(1) |
$ | 75,000 | $ | 2,503 | $ | 72,497 | December 2011; September 2023 | Prime Rate +2.00%(2); 5.25% |
||||||||||||
Quorum Purchase Facility |
20,000 | 1,192 | 18,808 | December 2011; December 2030 | 8.00% | |||||||||||||||
NBA Receivables Facility(3) |
20,000 | 16,714 | 3,286 | June 2011; June 2018 |
30 day LIBOR+5.25%; 6.75%(5) |
|||||||||||||||
2011 Liberty Bank Facility(1)(4) |
60,000 | 5,472 | 9,126 | February 2013; February 2016 | Prime Rate +2.25%; 6.50%(6) | |||||||||||||||
$ | 175,000 | $ | 25,881 | $ | 103,717 | |||||||||||||||
76
Table of Contents
Real Estate
(1) | Facility is revolving during the advance period, providing additional availability as the facility is paid down, subject to eligible collateral and applicable terms and conditions. | |
(2) | The borrowing rate is subject to tiered increases once the outstanding balance equals or exceeds $25.0 million, subject to a maximum interest rate of the Prime Rate plus 3.5%, once the outstanding balance under the facility equals or exceeds $50.0 million. | |
(3) | Bluegreen has received a term sheet to amend its existing National Bank of Arizona (NBA) facility which would allow Bluegreen to pledge additional timeshare receivables up to the borrowing limit, with the additional advances not to exceed $5.0 million. The amount shown as Availability as of March 31, 2011 and the dates under Advance Period Expiration: Borrowing Maturity are pro-forma, as if the amendment had been closed as of March 31, 2011. Bluegreen may not be successful in its efforts to enter into this amendment or the contemplated terms, or at all. | |
(4) | In February 2011, Bluegreen entered into a new revolving hypothecation facility with certain existing participants in the Liberty-led syndicate. The availability under the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility is reduced by the amounts outstanding to the extending participants under the 2008 Liberty Bank Facility, as the aggregate amount outstanding to such participants under the 2008 Liberty Bank Facility and the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility at any point in time cannot exceed $60.0 million. The amount outstanding under the 2008 Liberty Bank Facility to the extending participants was $45.4 million as of March 31, 2011. | |
(5) | Interest charged on this facility is subject to a floor of 6.75% | |
(6) | Interest charged on this facility is subject to a floor of 6.50% |
BB&T Purchase Facility. We have a $75.0 million timeshare notes receivable purchase facility
with Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) (the BB&T Purchase Facility). The BB&T Purchase
Facility provides a revolving advance period through December 17, 2011. The interest rates on
future advances under the facility are the Prime Rate plus 2.0%, subject to tiered increases once
the outstanding balance equals or exceeds $25.0 million, with a maximum interest rate of the Prime
Rate plus 3.5% once the outstanding balance equals or exceeds $50.0 million. We receive all of the
excess cash flows generated by the timeshare receivables transferred to BB&T under the facility
(excess meaning after customary payment of fees, interest and principal under the facility) subject
to the compliance with covenants and terms of the BB&T Purchase Facility. The BB&T Purchase
Facility provides for the financing of our timeshare receivables at an advance rate of 67.5%,
subject to the terms of the facility.
While ownership of the receivables is transferred for legal purposes, the transfers of receivables
under the facility are accounted for as secured borrowings. Accordingly, the receivables are
reflected as assets and the associated obligations are reflected as liabilities on our balance
sheet. The BB&T Purchase Facility is nonrecourse and is not guaranteed by us.
During the first quarter of 2011, we pledged $3.7 million of VOI notes receivable to this facility
and received cash proceeds of $2.5 million.
In April 2011, we pledged $4.9 million of VOI notes receivable to this facility and received cash
proceeds of $3.3 million. Subsequent to this borrowing, Bluegreen had $69.2 million in availability
under this facility.
Quorum Purchase Facility. On December 22, 2010, Bluegreen entered into a timeshare receivables
purchase facility (the Quorum Purchase Facility) with Quorum Federal Credit Union (Quorum). The
Quorum Facility allows for the sale of timeshare notes receivable on a non-recourse basis, pursuant
to the terms of the facility and subject to certain conditions precedent. Quorum has agreed to
purchase eligible timeshare receivables from us or certain of our
subsidiaries up to an aggregate $20.0 million purchase price through December 22, 2011. The terms
of the Quorum Purchase Facility reflect an 80% advance rate and a program fee rate of 8% per annum
through August 31, 2011, and terms to be agreed upon through December 22, 2011. Eligibility
requirements for receivables sold include, among others, that the obligors under the timeshare
notes receivable sold be members of Quorum at the time of the note sale. The Quorum Purchase
Facility contemplates the ability of Quorum to purchase additional receivables subject to advance
rates, fees and other terms to be agreed upon from time to time over and above the initial $20.0
million commitment, pursuant to the terms of the facility and subject to certain conditions
precedent. Subject to performance of the collateral, Bluegreen will receive all of the excess cash
flows generated by the receivables transferred to Quorum under the facility (excess meaning after
customary payment of fees and return of amounts invested by Quorum under the facility on a pro-rata
basis as borrowers make payments on their timeshare loans).
During the first quarter of 2011, we pledged $1.4 million of VOI notes receivable to this facility
and received cash proceeds of $1.1 million.
In April 2011, Bluegreen pledged $0.8 million of VOI notes receivable to this facility and received
cash proceeds of $0.6 million. Subsequent to this borrowing, and based on subsequent repayments,
Bluegreen had $18.2 million in availability under this facility.
NBA Receivables Facility. In September 2010, Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture entered into a $20.0
million
77
Table of Contents
Real Estate
timeshare receivables hypothecation facility with NBA (NBA Receivable Facility).
Bluegreen Corporation has guaranteed the full payment and performance of Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint
Venture in connection with this facility. The NBA Receivable Facility provides for an 85% advance
on $23.5 million of eligible receivables, all of which were pledged under the facility at closing,
subject to terms and conditions which Bluegreen believes to be customary for facilities of this
type. All principal and interest payments received on pledged receivables are applied to principal
and interest due under the facility, with the remaining balance due in September 2017. Indebtedness
under this facility bears interest at the 30-day LIBOR plus 5.25%, subject to a floor of 6.75%
(6.75% as of March 31, 2011). During the first quarter of 2011, we repaid $1.6 million on this
facility.
Bluegreen has received a term sheet to amend its existing NBA Receivable Facility which would allow
Bluegreen to pledge additional timeshare receivables up to the borrowing limit, with the
additional advances not to exceed $5.0 million. Bluegreen may not be successful in its efforts to
enter into this amendment or the contemplated terms, or at all.
2011 Liberty Bank Facility. In February 2011, we entered into a new revolving hypothecation
facility with certain participants in our 2008 Liberty Bank Facility (see discussion of our 2008
Liberty Bank Facility below, under Other Outstanding Receivable-Backed Notes Payable). This new
$60.0 million facility (2011 Liberty Bank Facility) provides for an 85% advance on eligible
receivables pledged under the facility during a two-year period ending in February 2013, subject to
eligible collateral and terms and conditions we believe to be customary for transactions of this
type. Availability under the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility is reduced by amounts outstanding to
certain syndicate participants under the 2008 Liberty Bank Facility ($45.4 million as of March 31,
2011), but as the outstanding amounts on the 2008 Liberty Bank Facility amortize over time, the
2011 Liberty Bank Facility will revolve up to $60.0 million. Principal and interest are repaid as
cash is collected on the pledged receivables, with the remaining balance due in February 2016.
Indebtedness under the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility bears interest at the Prime Rate plus 2.25%,
subject to a floor of 6.5% (6.5% as of March 31, 2011).
During the first quarter of 2011, Bluegreen pledged $6.6 million of VOI notes receivable to this
facility and received cash proceeds of $5.6 million, of which Bluegreen repaid $0.1 million.
Other Outstanding Receivable-Backed Notes Payable
Bluegreen has outstanding obligations under various receivable-backed credit facilities that have
no remaining future availability as the advance periods have expired. Bluegreen had the following
outstanding balances under such credit facilities as of March 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
Borrowing Rate; | ||||||||||||
Balance as of | Borrowing | Rate as of March 31, | ||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Maturity | 2011 | ||||||||||
2008 Liberty Bank Facility |
$ | 61,912 | August 27, 2014 | Prime + 2.25%; 6.50%(1) | ||||||||
GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Facility |
21,574 | August 16, 2016 | 30 day LIBOR+1.75%; 1.99% | |||||||||
Legacy Securitization(2) |
20,769 | September 2, 2025 | 12.00% | |||||||||
RFA Receivables Facility |
2,649 | February 15, 2015 | 30 day LIBOR+4.00%; 4.24% | |||||||||
Non-recourse Securitization Debt |
405,865 | Varies | Varies | |||||||||
$ | 512,769 | |||||||||||
(1) | Interest charged on this facility is subject to a floor of 6.50% |
78
Table of Contents
Real Estate
(2) | Legacy Securitization debt bears interest at a coupon rate of 12% and was issued at a discount resulting in an effective yield of 18.5%. The associated debt balance is presented net of the discount of $2.4 million. |
2008 Liberty Bank Facility. Bluegreen has a $75.0 million revolving timeshare receivables
hypothecation facility with a syndicate of lenders led by Liberty Bank and assembled by Wellington
Financial (2008 Liberty Bank Facility). Amounts borrowed under the facility and incurred
interest are repaid as cash is collected on the pledged receivables. The advance period under the
2008 Liberty Bank Facility has expired, and all outstanding borrowings are scheduled to mature no
later than August 27, 2014. During the first quarter of 2011, Bluegreen repaid $5.6 million on this
facility.
In February 2011, Bluegreen entered into the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility, a new revolving
hypothecation facility with certain existing participants in the Liberty-led syndicate. See Credit
Facilities for Bluegreen Receivables with Future Availability above for further information
regarding the 2011 Liberty Bank Facility.
The GE Bluegreen/Big Cedar Receivables Facility. In April 2007, the Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint
Venture entered into a $45.0 million revolving VOI receivables credit facility with GE (the GE
Bluegreen/Big Cedar Receivables Facility). Bluegreen Corporation has guaranteed the full payment
and performance of the Bluegreen/Big Cedar Joint Venture in connection with the GE Bluegreen/Big
Cedar Receivables Facility. The advance period under this facility expired on April 16, 2009, and
all outstanding borrowings are scheduled to mature no later than April 16, 2016. The facility
includes affirmative, negative and financial covenants and events of default. All principal and
interest payments received on pledged receivables are applied to principal and interest due under
the facility. Indebtedness under the facility bears interest adjusted monthly at a rate equal to
the 30 day LIBOR rate plus 1.75%. During the first quarter of 2011, we repaid $2.3 million on this
facility.
Legacy Securitization. In September 2010, we completed a securitization transaction of the lowest
FICO®-score loans previously financed in the BB&T Purchase Facility. Substantially all of the
timeshare receivables included in this transaction were generated prior to December 15, 2008, the
date that we implemented our FICO® score-based credit underwriting program, and had
FICO® scores below 600.
In this securitization, BXG Legacy 2010 LLC, a wholly-owned special purpose subsidiary of
Bluegreen, issued $27.0 million of notes payable secured by a portfolio of timeshare receivables
totaling $36.1 million. While the notes payable have a coupon rate of 12%, they were sold at a $2.7
million discount to yield an effective rate of
18.5%. The notes payable generated gross proceeds to us of $24.3 million (before fees and reserves
and expenses we believe to be customary for transactions of this type), which were used to repay a
portion of the outstanding balance under the BB&T Purchase Facility.
Bluegreen guaranteed the principal payments for defaulted vacation ownership loans in the Legacy
Securitization at amounts equivalent to the then-current advance rate inherent in the notes, any
shortfalls in monthly interest distributions to the Legacy Securitization investors and any
shortfall in the ultimate principal payment on the notes upon their stated maturity in September
2025. During the first quarter of 2011, we repaid $2.2 million on this facility.
Credit Facilities for Bluegreen Inventories without Existing Future Availability
Bluegreen has outstanding obligations under various credit facilities and other notes payable
collateralized by our Bluegreen Resorts or Bluegreen Communities inventories. As of March 31,
2011, these included the following significant items (dollars in thousands):
79
Table of Contents
Real Estate
Balance as of | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Borrowing | Borrowing Rate; Rate as of | ||||||||||
2011 | Maturity(1) | March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||
RFA AD&C Facility |
$ | 47,694 | Varies by loan (2) | 30 day LIBOR+4.50%; 4.76% | ||||||||
H4BG Communities Facility |
29,122 | December 31, 2012 | Prime + 2.00%; 8.00% (3) |
|||||||||
Textron AD&C Facility |
8,538 | Varies by loan (2) | Prime + 1.25 1.50%; 4.50% 4.75% | |||||||||
Wells Fargo Term Loan |
27,501 | April 30, 2012 | 30 day LIBOR + 6.87%; 7.11% | |||||||||
$ | 112,855 | |||||||||||
(1) | Repayment of the outstanding amount is effected through release payments as the related collateral is sold, subject to periodic minimum required amortization between March 31, 2011 and maturity. | |
(2) | The maturity dates for this facility vary by loan as discussed below. | |
(3) | The interest rate on this facility is subject to the following floors: (1) 8.0% until the balance of the loan is less than or equal to $20 million, and (2) 6.0% thereafter. |
RFA AD&C Facility. In September 2010, GMAC assigned all rights, title, and interest in this
facility (previously known as GMAC AD&C Facility) to Resort Finance America, LLC (RFA). This
assignment did not affect any of the material financial terms of the loan agreement. This facility
was used to finance the acquisition and development of certain of our resorts and currently has one
outstanding project loan. The maturity date for the project loan collateralized by our Bluegreen
Club 36TM resort in Las Vegas, Nevada (the Club 36 Loan) is June 30, 2012.
Approximately $47.7 million was outstanding on the Club 36 Loan as of March 31, 2011, $25.1 million
of which is due by October 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, we repaid the entire outstanding balance
of the project loan collateralized by our Fountains resort in Orlando, Florida. Principal payments
are effected through agreed-upon release prices as timeshare interests in Bluegreen Club 36 are
sold, subject to periodic minimum required amortization. As of March 31, 2011, we had no
availability under this facility. During the first quarter of 2011, we repaid $4.6 million of the
outstanding balance under this facility.
H4BG Communities Facility. The H4BG Communities Facility is secured by the real property homesites
(and personal property related thereto) at the following Bluegreen Communities projects (the
Secured Projects): Havenwood at Hunters Crossing (New Braunfels, Texas); The Bridges at Preston
Crossings (Grayson County, Texas); King Oaks (College Station, Texas); Vintage Oaks at the Vineyard
(New Braunfels, Texas); and Sanctuary Cove at St. Andrews Sound (Waverly, Georgia). In addition,
the H4BG Communities Facility is secured by our golf courses: The Bridges at Preston Crossings
(Grayson County, Texas) and Sanctuary Cove (Waverly, Georgia).
Principal payments are effected through agreed-upon release prices as real estate collateralizing
the H4BG Communities Facility is sold, subject to minimum required amortization. The interest rate
on the H4BG Communities Facility is the Prime Rate plus 2.0%, subject to the following floors: (1)
8.0% until the balance of the
loan is less than or equal to $20 million, and (2) 6.0% thereafter. During the first quarter of
2011, we repaid $1.7 million of the outstanding balance under this facility.
Textron AD&C Facility. In April 2008, Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. (BVU), our wholly-owned
subsidiary, entered into a $75.0 million, revolving master acquisition, development and
construction facility loan agreement (the Textron AD&C Facility) with Textron Financial
Corporation (Textron). The Textron AD&C Facility has historically been used to facilitate the
borrowing of funds for resort acquisition and development activities. We have guaranteed all
sub-loans under the master agreement. Interest on the Textron AD&C Facility is equal to the Prime
Rate plus 1.25% 1.50% and is due monthly. The advance period under the Textron AD&C Facility has
expired.
On October 28, 2009, we entered into an amendment to the Textron AD&C Facility and a sub-loan under
the facility used to fund the acquisition and development of our Odyssey Dells Resort (the Odyssey
Sub-Loan). The amendment to the Odyssey Sub-Loan extended the final maturity of outstanding
borrowings under the Odyssey Sub-Loan to December 31, 2011, and revised the periodic minimum
required principal amortization. We pay Textron
80
Table of Contents
Real Estate
principal payments as we sell timeshare interests
that collateralize the Odyssey Sub-Loan, subject to periodic minimum required principal
amortization. As amended, our minimum required principal payments are $1.0 million per quarter
through maturity. As of March 31, 2011, our outstanding borrowings under the Odyssey Sub-Loan
totaled approximately $2.9 million.
Bluegreen also has a sub-loan under the Textron AD&C Facility which we used to acquire our Atlantic
Palace Resort in Atlantic City, New Jersey (the Atlantic Palace Sub-Loan). The outstanding
balance under the Atlantic Palace Sub-Loan was $5.6 million as of March 31, 2011. Bluegreen pays
Textron principal payments as we sell timeshare interests that collateralize the Atlantic Palace
Sub-Loan, subject to periodic minimum required principal amortization. The final maturity of
outstanding borrowings under the Atlantic Palace Sub-Loan is April 2013.
Interest on the Textron AD&C Facility is equal to the Prime Rate plus 1.25% 1.50% and is due
monthly. During the first quarter of 2011, Bluegreen repaid $0.8 million under this facility.
Wells Fargo Term Loan. On April 30, 2010, Bluegreen entered into a definitive agreement with Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), which amended, restated and consolidated our then existing notes
payable and line-of-credit with Wachovia Bank, N.A. into a single term loan with Wells Fargo (the
Wells Fargo Term Loan). Principal payments are effected through agreed-upon release prices as
real estate collateralizing the Wells Fargo Term Loan is sold, subject to minimum remaining
required amortization as of March 31, 2011 of $7.3 million in 2011 and $20.2 million in 2012. In
addition to the resort projects previously pledged as collateral for the various notes payable to
Wachovia, Bluegreen pledged additional timeshare interests, resorts real estate, and the residual
interests in certain of our sold VOI notes receivable as collateral for the Wells Fargo Term Loan.
As required by the terms of the Wells Fargo Term Loan, Wells Fargo received, as additional
collateral, the residual interest in a term securitization transaction Bluegreen completed in
December 2010. The Wells Fargo Term Loan bears interest at the 30-day LIBOR plus 6.87% (7.11% as of
March 31, 2011).
During the first quarter of 2011, Bluegreen repaid $3.3 million of the outstanding balance under
this facility.
Commitments
Bluegreen material commitments as of March 31, 2011 included the required payments due on our
receivable-backed debt, lines-of-credit and other notes payable, commitments to complete its
Bluegreen Resorts and Communities projects based on our sales contracts with customers and
commitments under noncancelable operating leases.
The following tables summarize the contractual minimum principal and interest payments,
respectively, net of unamortized discount, required on all of Bluegreen outstanding debt (including
our receivable-backed debt, lines-of-credit and other notes and debentures payable) and our
noncancelable operating leases by period date, as of March 31, 2011, (in thousands):
Purchase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounting | Lesss than | 13-36 | 37-60 | More than | ||||||||||||||||||||
Category | Total | Adjustments | 12 months | Months | Months | 60 Months | ||||||||||||||||||
Long Term Debt Obligations (1) |
$ | 724,811 | (56,119 | ) | 46,913 | 69,579 | 92,425 | 572,013 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating Lease Obligations |
57,229 | | 9,086 | 12,730 | 10,280 | 25,133 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Obligations |
$ | 782,040 | (56,119 | ) | 55,999 | 82,309 | 102,705 | 597,146 | ||||||||||||||||
(1) | Legacy Securitization payments included in the long-term debt obligations more than 60 months are presented net of discount of $2.4 million. |
Bluegreen estimates that the cash required to satisfy its development obligations related to
resort buildings and resort amenities was approximately $6.0 million as of March 31, 2011.
Bluegreen estimates that the cash required to satisfy its development obligations related to
communities was approximately $5.0 million as of March 31, 2011. These amounts assume that
Bluegreen is not obligated to develop any building, project or amenity in which a commitment has
not been made pursuant to a sales contract with a customer; however, we anticipate that we will
incur such obligations in the future. Bluegreen plans to fund these expenditures over the next
three to ten years, primarily with cash generated from operations; however, Bluegreen may not be
able to generate the cash from operations necessary to complete these commitments and actual costs
may exceed the amounts estimated.
Bluegreen believes that its existing cash, anticipated cash generated from operations, anticipated
future permitted
81
Table of Contents
Real Estate
borrowings under existing or proposed credit facilities and anticipated future
sales of notes receivable under the purchase facilities and one or more replacement facilities
Bluegreen will seek to put in place will be sufficient to meet its anticipated working capital,
capital expenditures and debt service requirements, including the contractual payment of the
obligations set forth above, for the foreseeable future, subject to the successful implementation
of ongoing strategic initiatives and the ongoing availability of credit. Bluegreen will continue in
its efforts to renew, extend, or replace any credit and receivables purchase facilities that have
expired or that will expire in the near term. Bluegreen may, in the future, also obtain additional
credit facilities and may issue corporate debt or equity securities. Any debt incurred or issued by
us may be secured or unsecured, bear interest at fixed or variable rates and may be subject to such
terms as the lender may require. In addition, our efforts to renew or replace the credit facilities
or receivables purchase facilities which have expired or which are scheduled to expire in the near
term may not be successful, and sufficient funds may not be available from operations or under
existing, proposed or future revolving credit or other borrowing arrangements or receivables
purchase facilities to meet our cash needs, including our debt service obligations. To the extent
we are not able to sell notes receivable or borrow under such facilities our ability to satisfy our
obligations would be materially adversely affected.
Bluegreen credit facilities, indentures, and other outstanding debt instruments, and receivables
purchase facilities include what we believe to be customary conditions to funding, eligibility
requirements for collateral, cross-default and other acceleration provisions, certain financial and
other affirmative and negative covenants, including, among others, limits on the incurrence of
indebtedness, the repurchase of securities, payment of dividends, investments in joint ventures and
other restricted payments, the incurrence of liens, and transactions with affiliates, as well as
covenants concerning net worth, fixed charge coverage requirements, debt-to-equity ratios,
portfolio performance requirements, cash balances and events of default or termination. In the
future, Bluegreen may be required to seek waivers of such covenants, and we may not be successful
in obtaining waivers, and such covenants may limit its ability to raise funds, sell receivables,
satisfy or refinance our obligations or otherwise adversely affect our operations. Further,
certain of our outstanding debt include covenants which materially limit our ability to pay cash
dividends on our common stock or our ability to repurchase shares of our outstanding common. In
addition, Bluegreen future operating performance and ability to meet its financial obligations will
be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of
which will be beyond its control.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2011, Bluegreen did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
82
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
Financial Services
Our Financial Services activities of BFC are comprised of the operations of BankAtlantic
Bancorp and its subsidiaries. BankAtlantic Bancorp currently presents its results in two reportable
segments and its results of operations are consolidated in BFC Financial Corporation. The only
assets available to BFC Financial Corporation from BankAtlantic Bancorp are dividends when and if
paid by BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic Bancorp is a separate public company and its management
prepared the following discussion regarding BankAtlantic Bancorp which was included in BankAtlantic
Bancorps Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, references to the Company, the Parent Company
we, us or our in the following discussion under the caption Financial Services are
references to BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries, and are not references to BFC Financial
Corporation, Woodbridge or Bluegreen.
Loss from continuing operations from each of BankAtlantic Bancorps reportable segments was as
follows (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||
BankAtlantic |
$ | (16,370 | ) | (17,129 | ) | 759 | ||||||
Parent Company |
(6,517 | ) | (3,392 | ) | (3,125 | ) | ||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
$ | (22,887 | ) | (20,521 | ) | (2,366 | ) | |||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to the Same 2010 Period:
The decrease in BankAtlantics loss during the 2011 first quarter compared to the same 2010
quarter primarily resulted from a $6.6 million decrease in non-interest expenses and a $4.2 million
decrease in the provision for loan losses, partially offset by a $5.3 million decrease in
non-interest income and a $4.8 million decrease in net interest income.
The decrease in non-interest expenses reflects lower compensation and occupancy expenses
associated with the consolidation of back-office facilities, workforce reductions, normal
attrition, as well as declines in personnel related to reduced store lobby and call center hours.
Additionally, BankAtlantic recognized $0.8 million in reversals of lease termination impairments
upon the termination of three operating leases. These lower non-interest expenses were partially
offset by higher professional fees and FDIC deposit insurance assessments. Professional fees
increased $0.4 million associated primarily with legal costs associated with tax certificate
activities as well as loan modifications and work-outs. FDIC deposit insurance assessment was $0.9
million higher primarily due to BankAtlantics regulatory risk profile.
The decrease in the provision for loan losses primarily related to an $8.3 million reduction
in net charge-offs mainly in commercial and consumer loan products reflecting a slowing in the
amount of loans migrating to a delinquency or non-accrual status compared to prior periods as well
as significantly lower loan balances in our commercial real estate residential portfolio. Over
the last four years, the majority of our loan losses were associated with our commercial
residential real estate portfolio.
The lower non-interest income reflects declining revenues from service charges on deposits
and lower gains on securities sales. The lower service charges on deposits reflect a substantial
decrease in overdraft fees. We believe that the decline in overdraft fee income primarily resulted
from a decline in the number of accounts incurring overdraft fees resulting from our efforts to
seek customers who maintain deposit accounts with higher balances, as well as regulatory changes
and changes in customer behavior. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, BankAtlantic
sold $47.1 million of agency securities for a $3.1 million gain. There were no agency securities
sold during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
The lower net interest income resulted primarily from a significant reduction in earning
assets, investments in low yielding short-term time deposits and securities and increases in
non-performing assets. BankAtlantic has continued to seek to reduce its asset balances to improve
its regulatory capital ratios.
83
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The increase in the Parent Companys loss from continuing operations for the 2011 quarter
compared to the same 2010 quarter primarily resulted from $1.9 million of real estate owned
impairments and $0.4 million of additional valuation allowances on loans held for sale. The above
impairments primarily resulted from updated property and collateral values associated with loans
and real estate owned held by the Parent Companys asset workout subsidiary.
BankAtlantic Results of Operations
Net interest income
Average Balance Sheet - Yield / Rate Analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Revenue/ | Yield/ | Average | Revenue/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 3,106,532 | 34,862 | 4.49 | $ | 3,751,907 | 41,579 | 4.43 | ||||||||||||||||
Investments |
1,117,891 | 4,559 | 1.63 | 603,864 | 6,136 | 4.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest earning assets |
4,224,423 | 39,421 | 3.73 | % | 4,355,771 | 47,715 | 4.38 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles |
14,411 | 15,652 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest earning assets |
271,214 | 313,083 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 4,510,048 | $ | 4,684,506 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings |
$ | 468,673 | 272 | 0.24 | % | $ | 425,235 | 333 | 0.32 | % | ||||||||||||||
NOW |
1,519,105 | 1,512 | 0.40 | 1,467,103 | 2,218 | 0.61 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money market |
389,155 | 442 | 0.46 | 360,470 | 629 | 0.71 | ||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
658,050 | 2,141 | 1.32 | 896,074 | 3,877 | 1.75 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing deposits |
3,034,983 | 4,367 | 0.58 | 3,148,882 | 7,057 | 0.91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowed funds |
30,083 | 10 | 0.13 | 39,376 | 13 | 0.13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
134,833 | 115 | 0.35 | 173,011 | 958 | 2.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
22,000 | 225 | 4.15 | 22,507 | 228 | 4.11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
3,221,899 | 4,717 | 0.59 | 3,383,776 | 8,256 | 0.99 | ||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
944,950 | 864,391 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing other liabilities |
52,892 | 54,312 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
4,219,741 | 4,302,479 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
290,307 | 382,027 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
$ | 4,510,048 | $ | 4,684,506 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income/
net interest spread |
$ | 34,704 | 3.14 | % | 39,459 | 3.39 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Margin |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income/interest earning assets |
3.73 | % | 4.38 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense/interest earning assets |
0.45 | 0.77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin |
3.28 | % | 3.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
84
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to the Same 2010 Period:
The decrease in net interest income primarily resulted from a reduction in earning assets, an
increase in cash balances invested in low yielding investments and a reduction in the net interest
margin.
The average balance of earning assets declined by $131.3 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2011 compared to the same 2010 period. The decline in average earning assets reflects a
management decision to slow the origination and purchase of loans, sell agency securities and
reduce the purchase of tax certificates. BankAtlantic also experienced significant residential loan
repayments due to normal loan amortization as well as a significant amount of loan refinancings
associated with low residential mortgage interest rates during 2010 and the first three months of
2011. BankAtlantic used a portion of the cash proceeds resulting from the above to purchase
short-term investments, including: time deposits at other banks, agency securities, tax exempt
securities and to maintain higher interest earning cash balances at the Federal Reserve Bank. The
average balances at the Federal Reserve Bank were $553.9 million for the 2011 quarter compared to
$162.2 million for the 2010 quarter. These short-term investments and interest earning cash
balances were maintained in anticipation of funding the pending Tampa branch sale and to enhance
liquidity and improve regulatory risk-based capital ratios.
Average loan balances declined from $3.8 billion for the 2010 first quarter to $3.1 billion
for the 2011 first quarter while average investment balances increased from $603.9 million during
the 2010 quarter to $1.1 billion during the 2011 first quarter. The majority of the increases in
investment average balances were average balances at the Federal Reserve Bank yielding
approximately 21 basis points during the first quarter of 2011.
The net interest margin declined due to a change in our interest earning asset mix from higher
yielding loans and mortgage-backed securities to lower yielding short-term investments and interest
earning cash balances at the Federal Reserve Bank. The decline in interest earning asset yields was
partially offset by a decline in interest bearing liability interest rates.
The improvement in interest bearing liability interest rates primarily resulted from a decline
in the average interest rates on deposits. The low average rates on deposits reflect the low
interest rate environment and a significant reduction in certificate of deposit balances with a
corresponding migration of customers to NOW and demand deposit transaction accounts. These
accounts generally have lower interest costs than certificates of deposit. Additionally,
BankAtlantic significantly reduced its intermediate term FHLB advance borrowings which typically
have higher interest rates than short-term borrowings. Currently, BankAtlantics FHLB borrowings
mature in less than one year.
Asset Quality
The activity in BankAtlantics allowance for loan losses was as follows (in thousands):
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 161,309 | 173,588 | |||||
Charge-offs |
||||||||
Residential |
(8,011 | ) | (4,181 | ) | ||||
Commercial real estate |
(11,277 | ) | (21,332 | ) | ||||
Commercial non-mortgage |
(464 | ) | | |||||
Consumer |
(7,814 | ) | (10,771 | ) | ||||
Small business |
(2,611 | ) | (837 | ) | ||||
Total Charge-offs |
(30,177 | ) | (37,121 | ) | ||||
Recoveries of loans
previously charged-off |
2,354 | 1,047 | ||||||
Net (charge-offs) |
(27,823 | ) | (36,074 | ) | ||||
Transfer to held for sale |
(7,081 | ) | | |||||
Provision for loan losses |
27,832 | 32,034 | ||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 154,237 | 169,548 | |||||
Residential loan charge-offs increased significantly during the three months ended March 31,
2011
85
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
compared to the same 2010 period. The higher residential charge-offs reflect a decline in
property values during the first quarter of 2011. We believe the property value declines resulted
primarily from a lack of available residential loan financing, appraisals not supporting negotiated
sales prices and higher residential property inventory resulting from foreclosures nationally.
Commercial real estate loan charge-offs declined due to lower charge-offs in BankAtlantics
residential commercial loan portfolio. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, BankAtlantic
recognized $4.0 million of charge-offs related to four commercial residential loans, $6.8 million
of charge-offs related to one commercial land loan and $0.5 million related to commercial other
loans. These charge-offs were primarily due to lower updated property valuations. The specific
valuation allowances on these loans as of December 31, 2010 were $10.1 million. During the first
quarter of 2010, BankAtlantics commercial real estate charge-offs were entirely from commercial
residential loans. The specific valuation allowances on these loans as of December 31, 2009 were
$13.2 million.
The commercial non-mortgage loan charge-off was associated with one business loan in the real
estate brokerage industry.
We believe that the decline in the consumer loan charge-offs reflects the stabilization of the
unemployment rate and an improving economy in Florida. Additionally, BankAtlantic significantly
reduced the origination and enhanced its underwriting criteria of home equity loans during 2008.
As a consequence, loan delinquencies and charge-offs have declined as loan balances of loans
originated prior to 2008 have declined.
Included in the small business loan charge-offs for the 2011 quarter was a $1.0 million
charge-off of a small business mortgage loan. The remaining small business charge-offs were
primarily associated with businesses in the real estate industry.
Historically, the majority of BankAtlantics charge-offs related to commercial real estate
loans; however, BankAtlantic is experiencing certain unfavorable credit quality trends in its
residential and small business loan portfolios which we believe reflects that the home building and
construction industries in Florida have not shown signs of recovery. The decrease in the
provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same 2010
period resulted primarily from lower loan delinquencies, a decline in loans migrating to
non-accrual status and lower charge-offs.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, as part of its management of non-performing
assets, BankAtlantic transferred $25.1 million of residential and $2.5 million of commercial real
estate non-accrual loans to loans held for sale with a view toward selling the loans in the
foreseeable future. BankAtlantic transferred the loans at the lower of cost or fair value
resulting in a $7.1 million reduction in the allowance for loan losses.
While we believe that there are some positive trends in the economy both in Florida and
nationally that indicate that we may experience a decline in credit losses in future periods, if
the housing and real estate industries do not improve or if general economic conditions do not
continue to improve in Florida and nationwide, the credit quality of our loan portfolio may
deteriorate and additional provisions for loan losses will be required. Additionally, we have a
significant amount of variable interest rate loans in our portfolio and a substantial increase in
interest rates in the future would increase the interest payments on these loans and could have an
adverse effect on the credit quality of those loans.
86
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
At the indicated dates, BankAtlantics non-performing assets, loans contractually past due 90
days or more and still accruing, performing impaired loans and troubled debt restructured loans
were as follows (in thousands):
As of | ||||||||
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS |
||||||||
Tax certificates |
$ | 3,402 | 3,636 | |||||
Residential (1) |
81,555 | 86,538 | ||||||
Commercial real estate (2) |
239,798 | 243,299 | ||||||
Commercial non-mortgage |
15,848 | 16,123 | ||||||
Small business |
12,172 | 10,879 | ||||||
Consumer |
13,231 | 14,120 | ||||||
Total non-accrual assets (3) |
366,006 | 374,595 | ||||||
REPOSSESSED ASSETS: |
||||||||
Residential real estate |
15,643 | 16,418 | ||||||
Commercial real estate |
46,837 | 44,136 | ||||||
Small business real estate |
3,727 | 3,693 | ||||||
Consumer real estate |
103 | 81 | ||||||
Total repossessed assets |
66,310 | 64,328 | ||||||
Total non-performing assets |
$ | 432,316 | 438,923 | |||||
Total non-performing assets as
a percentage of: |
||||||||
Total assets |
9.77 | 9.82 | ||||||
Loans, tax certificates and
real estate owned |
13.66 | 13.08 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 4,424,566 | 4,469,168 | |||||
TOTAL LOANS, TAX CERTIFICATES
AND NET REAL ESTATE OWNED |
$ | 3,165,310 | 3,355,711 | |||||
Allowance for loan losses |
$ | 154,237 | 161,309 | |||||
Tax certificates |
$ | 77,837 | 89,789 | |||||
Allowance for tax certificate losses |
$ | 9,287 | 8,811 | |||||
OTHER ACCRUING IMPAIRED
LOANS |
||||||||
Contractually past due 90 days
or more |
$ | | | |||||
Performing impaired loans (4) |
22,387 | 11,880 | ||||||
Troubled debt restructured loans (5) |
95,675 | 96,006 | ||||||
TOTAL OTHER ACCRUING
IMPAIRED LOANS |
$ | 118,062 | 107,886 | |||||
(1) | Includes $37.5 million and $38.9 million of interest-only residential loans as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. | |
(2) | Excluded from the above table as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $11.4 million and $14.5 million, respectively, of commercial residential loans that were transferred to a work-out subsidiary of the Parent Company in March 2008. | |
(3) | Includes $141.8 million and $143.8 million of troubled debt restructured loans as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. | |
(4) | BankAtlantic believes that it will ultimately collect the principal and interest associated with these loans; however, the timing of the payments may not be in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. | |
(5) | These loans are performing in accordance with their respective modified terms. |
Non-performing assets were slightly lower at March 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010 due primarily to a decline in residential and commercial real estate non-accrual loans partially offset by higher small business and repossessed asset balances. |
The decline in residential non-accrual loans was primarily the result of charge-offs and fair
value adjustments associated with non-accrual residential loans transferred to loans held for sale.
Also contributing to lower non-accrual residential loans was a decline in delinquencies.
Residential loans past due 30 to 90 days declined from $23.1 million at December 31, 2010 to $20.5
million at March 31, 2011. However, economic trends
87
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
for residential loans deteriorated during the first quarter of 2011 as property values
nationally generally declined and foreclosure timelines continue to be extended. If these trends
continue, we would anticipate higher residential non-accrual loan balances and real estate owned in
subsequent periods.
The decline in commercial real estate non-accrual loans primarily resulted from a decline in
loans migrating to a non-accrual status. During the 2011 quarter, $17.2 million of loans migrated
to a non-accrual status while $31.8 million of loans migrated to non-accrual during the 2010
quarter.
The higher balance of repossessed assets at March 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010
resulted primarily from foreclosures of commercial real estate loans. During the three months ended
March 31, 2011, BankAtlantic transferred $6.8 million of loans to real estate owned and sold $4.4
million of REO properties. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, BankAtlantic transferred
$8.1 million of loans to real estate owned and sold $3.2 million of REO properties. As non-accrual
loans migrate into repossessed assets in the future, we expect repossessed assets to increase.
BankAtlantics troubled debt restructured loans at March 31, 2011 remained at December 31,
2010 levels. In response to current market conditions, BankAtlantic generally decides, on a
case-by-case basis, whether to modify loans for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties and
has modified the terms of certain commercial, small business, residential and consumer home equity
loans. Generally, the concessions made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties have
included a variety of modifications, including among others, the reduction of contractual interest
rates, forgiveness of loan principal upon satisfactory performance under the modified terms,
conversion of amortizing loans to interest only payments or the deferral of some interest payments
to the maturity date of the loan. Loans that are not delinquent at the date of modification are
generally not placed on non-accrual. Modified non-accrual loans are generally not returned to an
accruing status and BankAtlantic does not reset days past due on delinquent modified loans until
the borrower demonstrates a sustained period of performance under the modified terms, which is
generally performance over a six month period.
BankAtlantics troubled debt restructured loans by loan type were as follows (in thousands):
As of March 31, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Non-accrual | Accruing | Non-accrual | Accruing | |||||||||||||
Commercial
non-mortgage |
$ | 4,011 | 647 | 4,161 | 647 | |||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
125,985 | 70,454 | 126,622 | 70,343 | ||||||||||||
Small business |
3,331 | 8,024 | 2,990 | 9,401 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
1,389 | 13,342 | 3,070 | 12,638 | ||||||||||||
Residential |
7,122 | 3,208 | 6,917 | 2,977 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 141,838 | 95,675 | 143,760 | 96,006 | |||||||||||
BankAtlantics commercial loan portfolio includes large loan balance lending relationships.
Seven relationships accounted for 50.9% of our $255.6 million of non-accrual commercial loans as of
March 31, 2011.
88
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The following table outlines general information about these seven relationships as of March
31, 2011 (in thousands):
Unpaid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | Recorded | Specific | Date loan | Date Placed | Default | Loan | Date of Last | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationships | Balance | Investment (5) | Reserves | Originated | on Nonaccrual | Date (4) | Class | Full Appraisal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Land Developers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 1 (1) |
$ | 42,327 | 17,557 | 727 | Q3-2004 | Q4-2008 | Q4-2008 | Land | Q4-2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Land Developers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 2 |
25,820 | 25,820 | 10,069 | Q2-2005 | Q4-2010 | (3) | Land and other | Q1-2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 3 |
27,522 | 26,209 | 10,443 | Q1-1995 | Q4-2009 | Q4-2009 | Land | Q1-2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 4 |
17,777 | 17,777 | 8,641 | Q3-2006 | Q1-2010 | Q1-2010 | Other | Q4-2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
71,119 | 69,806 | 29,153 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Non-Residential
Developers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 5 (2) |
15,427 | 14,926 | 3,777 | Q3-2007 | Q4-2010 | (3) | Other | Q4-2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 6 |
25,420 | 25,109 | 8,650 | Q3-2006 | Q2-2010 | (3) | Other | Q2-2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 7 |
16,440 | 16,331 | 4,361 | Q1-2007 | Q3-2010 | (3) | Other | Q3-2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
57,287 | 56,366 | 16,788 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total of Large Relationships |
170,733 | 143,729 | 46,668 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | During 2009 and 2010, BankAtlantic recognized partial charge-offs on relationship No. 1 aggregating $17.2 million. | |
(2) | During 2011, BankAtlantic recognized partial charge-offs on relationship No. 5 of $6.0 million. | |
(3) | The loan is currently not in default. | |
(4) | The default date is defined as the date of the initial missed payment prior to default. | |
(5) | Recorded investment is the Unpaid Principal Balance less charge-offs. |
The following table presents our purchased residential loans by year of origination
segregated by amortizing and interest only loans (dollars in thousands):
Amortizing Purchased Residential Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year of | Unpaid | Recorded | LTV at | Current | FICO Scores | Current | Amount | Debt Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Origination | Principal | Investment | Origination | LTV (1) | at Origination | FICO Scores (2) | Delinquent | at Origination (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 39,436 | 37,500 | 65.35 | % | 117.47 | % | 739 | 736 | 6,210 | 33.22 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
44,560 | 43,208 | 71.52 | % | 125.49 | % | 732 | 717 | 5,373 | 36.73 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
65,290 | 60,812 | 73.84 | % | 117.16 | % | 725 | 713 | 12,033 | 35.56 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
267,540 | 264,192 | 68.80 | % | 84.94 | % | 732 | 724 | 22,944 | 34.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Prior to 2004 |
128,914 | 128,481 | 68.56 | % | 61.23 | % | 731 | 726 | 6,448 | 34.39 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Only Purchased Residential Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year of | Unpaid | Recorded | LTV at | Current | FICO Scores | Current | Amount | Debt Ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Origination | Principal | Investment | Origination | LTV (1) | at Origination | FICO Scores (2) | Delinquent | at Origination (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 72,282 | 67,234 | 72.42 | % | 128.67 | % | 748 | 740 | 14,729 | 34.47 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
168,700 | 160,274 | 73.86 | % | 124.71 | % | 739 | 742 | 32,962 | 34.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
142,812 | 140,636 | 70.75 | % | 116.00 | % | 739 | 742 | 6,117 | 34.69 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
69,107 | 68,095 | 70.73 | % | 100.08 | % | 744 | 716 | 7,170 | 32.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Prior to 2004 |
58,208 | 57,826 | 58.03 | % | 84.34 | % | 741 | 727 | 1,836 | 32.06 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
The following table presents our purchased residential loans by geographic area
segregated by amortizing and interest-only loans (dollars in thousands):
Amortizing Purchased Residential Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid | Recorded | LTV at | Current | FICO Scores | Current | Amount | Debt Ratios | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
State | Principal | Investment | Origination | LTV (1) | at Origination | FICO Scores (2) | Delinquent | at Origination (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arizona |
$ | 11,412 | 11,140 | 68.51 | % | 127.27 | % | 734 | 735 | 1,753 | 32.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
California |
136,731 | 132,443 | 69.57 | % | 89.49 | % | 735 | 730 | 16,610 | 35.65 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Florida |
79,814 | 76,810 | 69.27 | % | 105.24 | % | 721 | 706 | 12,117 | 35.04 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Nevada |
7,635 | 7,635 | 72.56 | % | 122.44 | % | 739 | 734 | 569 | 36.31 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other States |
327,186 | 323,199 | 69.02 | % | 83.93 | % | 731 | 730 | 22,176 | 34.05 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
89
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
Interest Only Purchased Residential Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid | Recorded | LTV at | Current | FICO Scores | Current | Amount | Debt Ratios | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
State | Principal | Investment | Origination | LTV (1) | at Origination | FICO Scores (2) | Delinquent | at Origination (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arizona |
$ | 15,942 | 15,038 | 71.37 | % | 150.72 | % | 758 | 751 | 2,777 | 31.76 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
California |
147,827 | 142,747 | 70.82 | % | 109.17 | % | 742 | 736 | 20,148 | 33.73 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Florida |
35,264 | 31,339 | 69.69 | % | 142.24 | % | 745 | 730 | 11,489 | 32.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Nevada |
6,697 | 5,245 | 74.37 | % | 206.99 | % | 736 | 726 | 3,961 | 33.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other States |
305,380 | 299,694 | 70.41 | % | 110.86 | % | 739 | 739 | 24,438 | 34.61 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Current loan-to-values (LTV) for the majority of the portfolio were obtained as of the first quarter of 2010 from automated valuation models. | |
(2) | Current FICO scores based on borrowers for which FICO scores were available as of the second quarter of 2010. | |
(3) | Debt ratio is defined as the portion of the borrowers income that goes towards debt service. |
The table below presents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses (ALL) by
various loan classifications, the percent of allowance to each loan category (ALL to gross loans
percent) and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans (Loans to gross loans
percent). The allowance shown in the table should not be interpreted as an indication that
charge-offs in future periods will occur in these amounts or percentages or that the allowance
accurately reflects future charge-off amounts or trends (dollars in thousands):
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
ALL | Loans | ALL | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||
to gross | by | to gross | by | |||||||||||||||||||||
ALL | loans | category | ALL | loans | category | |||||||||||||||||||
by | in each | to gross | by | in each | to gross | |||||||||||||||||||
category | category | loans | category | category | loans | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial non-mortgage |
$ | 10,708 | 8.18 | % | 4.27 | % | 10,786 | 8.05 | % | 4.14 | % | |||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
78,327 | 8.65 | 29.55 | 83,029 | 8.70 | 29.46 | ||||||||||||||||||
Small business |
10,125 | 3.42 | 9.67 | 11,514 | 3.80 | 9.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
27,566 | 2.46 | 36.60 | 23,937 | 1.96 | 37.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
27,511 | 4.51 | 19.91 | 32,043 | 5.14 | 19.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses |
$ | 154,237 | 5.03 | % | 100.00 | % | 161,309 | 4.98 | % | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||
Included in the allowance for loan losses as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were
specific reserves by loan type as follows (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Commercial non-mortgage |
$ | 8,949 | 9,020 | |||||
Commercial real estate |
58,536 | 62,986 | ||||||
Small business |
1,565 | 2,936 | ||||||
Consumer |
1,453 | 1,791 | ||||||
Residential |
7,369 | 12,034 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 77,872 | 88,767 | |||||
The decrease in the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2011 compared to December 31,
2010 resulted primarily from a decline in specific valuation allowances on commercial real estate
and residential loans. The commercial real estate specific valuation allowance decline reflects a
slowdown of loans migrating to an impaired classification. The residential loan specific reserve
decline reflects the reduction in specific allowances associated with $25.1 million of
non-performing loans transferring to loans held for sale as well as reductions in specific
allowances associated with foreclosed residential loan activity. The general reserve for
residential loans increased $8.3 million during the 2011 quarter reflecting increased charge-offs
and declining collateral values. Consumer loan general reserves were reduced by $4.2 million due
primarily to improvement in delinquency and charge-off trends as well as declining balances of
loans originated prior to 2008.
90
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantics Non-Interest Income
For the Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | Change | |||||||||
Service charges on deposits |
$ | 12,032 | 15,048 | (3,016 | ) | |||||||
Other service charges and fees |
7,191 | 7,378 | (187 | ) | ||||||||
Securities activities, net |
(24 | ) | 3,132 | (3,156 | ) | |||||||
Gains on sales of loans |
35 | 54 | (19 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
3,679 | 2,645 | 1,034 | |||||||||
Non-interest income |
$ | 22,913 | 28,257 | (5,344 | ) | |||||||
The lower revenues from service charges on deposits during the three months ended March 31,
2011 compared to the same 2010 period resulted primarily from lower overdraft fee income. This
decrease in overdraft fee income reflects a decline in the total number of accounts which incurred
overdraft fees and a decrease in the frequency of overdrafts per deposit account. We believe
that the decline in the number of accounts incurring overdraft fees reflected our efforts to seek
customers who maintain deposit accounts with higher balances, regulatory changes, and changes in
customer behavior. The Federal Reserve adopted new overdraft rules (effective July 1, 2010 for
new customers and August 15, 2010 for existing customers), which among other requirements,
prohibit banks from automatically enrolling customers in overdraft protection programs.
Additionally, Congress has established a consumer protection agency which may further limit the
assessment of overdraft fees. In response to the changing industry practices and regulations,
BankAtlantic, during the fourth quarter of 2010, began converting certain deposit products to
fee-based accounts that encourage higher checking account balances and the use of multiple bank
products in order to eliminate or reduce fees. Additionally, during the first quarter of 2011,
BankAtlantic revised its overdraft policies instituting a cap on the number of overdrafts,
eliminating overdraft charges on small overdraft amounts and lowering the overdraft protection
amount per day. We anticipate that these trends will continue and that our overdraft fee income
will be lower in future periods partially offset by increased fees from new deposit products and
expanded use of the banks fee services by deposit customers.
The decrease in other service charges and fees during the three months ended March 31, 2011
compared to the same 2010 period resulted primarily from lower ATM interchange and surcharge income
caused mostly by a lower volume of transactions on cruise ships.
In June 2010, BankAtlantic entered into a foreign currency derivative contract as an economic
hedge of foreign currency in cruise ship ATMs and during the first quarter of 2011, BankAtlantic
recognized a $24,000 loss in connection with these derivative contracts. During the three months
ended March 31, 2010, BankAtlantic sold $47.1 million of agency securities for a $3.1 million
gain.
The increase in other non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared
to the same 2010 period was primarily the result of $0.4 million of foreign currency exchange
gains associated with foreign currency held in cruise ship ATMs as well as $0.3 million of higher
commissions from the sales of investment products.
Other non-interest income consisted of the following (in thousands):
For the Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||
Broker commissions |
$ | 1,110 | 799 | 311 | ||||||||
Safe deposit box rental |
278 | 304 | (26 | ) | ||||||||
Income from leases |
270 | 258 | 12 | |||||||||
Fee income |
606 | 523 | 83 | |||||||||
Foreign exchange gains |
420 | | 420 | |||||||||
Other |
995 | 761 | 234 | |||||||||
Total other income |
$ | 3,679 | 2,645 | 1,034 | ||||||||
91
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
BankAtlantics Non-Interest Expense
For the Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
$ | 18,763 | 24,374 | (5,611 | ) | |||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
12,585 | 13,581 | (996 | ) | ||||||||
Advertising and promotion |
1,669 | 1,934 | (265 | ) | ||||||||
Check losses |
299 | 432 | (133 | ) | ||||||||
Professional fees |
2,981 | 2,565 | 416 | |||||||||
Supplies and postage |
870 | 965 | (95 | ) | ||||||||
Telecommunication |
572 | 529 | 43 | |||||||||
Provision for tax certificates |
779 | 733 | 46 | |||||||||
Cost associated with debt redemption |
10 | 7 | 3 | |||||||||
Lease termination costs |
(849 | ) | | (849 | ) | |||||||
Employee termination costs |
(154 | ) | | (154 | ) | |||||||
Impairment of loans held for sale |
201 | | 201 | |||||||||
Impairment of real estate owned |
403 | 143 | 260 | |||||||||
FDIC deposit insurance assessment |
3,305 | 2,358 | 947 | |||||||||
(Gain) on sale of real estate |
(278 | ) | (104 | ) | (174 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
309 | 322 | (13 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
4,689 | 4,882 | (193 | ) | ||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
$ | 46,154 | 52,721 | (6,567 | ) | |||||||
The decline in employee compensation and benefits during the three months ended March 31,
2011 compared to the same 2010 period resulted primarily from workforce reductions, normal
attrition as well as declines in personnel related to reduced store lobby and call center hours.
As a result of the work force reductions and normal attrition, the number of full-time equivalent
employees declined from 1,532 as of December 31, 2009 to 1,192 as of March 31, 2011.
Additionally, employee and executive bonuses were $1.2 million lower during the 2011 quarter
compared to the 2010 quarter. The decline in the workforce also resulted in reduced benefit costs
compared to 2010, primarily health insurance, payroll taxes and share-based compensation.
The decline in occupancy and equipment for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to
the same 2010 period resulted primarily from $0.8 million of lower rent expense, building
maintenance and real estate taxes related to the consolidation of back-office facilities and the
termination of leases executed for branch expansion during prior periods.
The decrease in advertising and business promotion expense during the 2011 quarter compared to
the same 2010 quarter related primarily to BankAtlantic focusing its marketing efforts on customer
relationships and away from advertising and media and direct mail promotions.
The lower check losses for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same 2010 quarter
were related primarily to revisions to our overdraft policies limiting the number of overdrafts
per day and the dollar amount of overdrafts.
The higher professional fees during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the
same 2010 period primarily resulted from legal and related costs in connection with tax
certificate activities as well as loan modifications and work-outs.
The costs associated with debt redemptions during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
reflect prepayment penalties from the early repayment of FHLB advance obligations.
The provision for tax certificate losses during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 reflects charge-offs and increases in tax certificate reserves for certain out-of-state
certificates. We have significantly
92
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
reduced the acquisition of out-of-state tax certificates and concentrate the majority of our
tax certificate acquisitions in Florida.
Lease termination costs represent lease contracts, net of deferred rent reversals, originally
executed for branch expansion. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, BankAtlantic
terminated three leases and recognized a recovery of $1.2 million. The recovery was partially
offset by $0.3 million of additional impairments on leases associated with updated valuations.
BankAtlantic is attempting to sublease or terminate lease contracts executed in connection with its
branch expansion in prior periods and could recognize losses associated with these operating leases
in subsequent periods as these leases are measured at fair value.
The recovery of employee termination costs during the three months ended March 31, 2011
reflects the forfeiture of termination benefits upon the re-hiring of terminated employees.
Impairment of loans held for sale represents lower of cost or market adjustments on loans
classified as held for sale.
Parent Company Results of Operations
For the Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | Change | |||||||||
Net interest expense |
$ | (3,695 | ) | (3,485 | ) | (210 | ) | |||||
Recovery for loan losses |
20 | 1,279 | (1,259 | ) | ||||||||
Net interest expense after
recovery for loan losses |
(3,675 | ) | (2,206 | ) | (1,469 | ) | ||||||
Non-interest income |
590 | 458 | 132 | |||||||||
Non-interest expense |
3,432 | 1,644 | 1,788 | |||||||||
Parent company loss |
$ | (6,517 | ) | (3,392 | ) | (3,125 | ) | |||||
Net interest expense increased during the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same 2010
quarter as a result of higher average debenture balances and interest rates. The average balances
on junior subordinated debentures increased from $309 million during the quarter ended March 31,
2010 to $323 million during the same 2011 quarter. The increase in average debenture balances
resulted from the deferral of interest which began in March 2009. Average rates on junior
subordinated debentures increased from 4.68% during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 to 4.75%
during the same 2011 quarter reflecting slightly higher LIBOR interest rates during the 2011
quarter compared to the 2010 quarter. Also included in net interest expense during the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $49,000 and $55,000, respectively, of interest income on
two performing loans as well as $36,000 and $18,000, respectively, of investment interest income
associated with investment securities.
Non-interest income during the three months ended March 31, 2011 reflects $381,000 of equity
earnings from the Parent Companys investment in statutory business trusts that issue trust
preferred securities and $286,000 of fees for executive services provided to BankAtlantic. Also
included in non-interest income was a loss of $99,000 from the sale of $1.7 million of loans held
for sale. Non-interest income during the three months ended March 31, 2010 resulted primarily from
$189,000 of equity earnings from statutory business trusts and $241,000 of fees for executive
services provided by BankAtlantic.
The increase in non-interest expense during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 compared to the
same 2010 quarter related primarily to $1.9 million of real estate owned impairments resulting from
updated property valuations and $427,000 of additional write-downs on loans held for sale. The
above increases in non-interest expenses were partially offset by $477,000 of lower compensation
expenses associated with the elimination of executive bonuses during the 2011 period.
93
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
In March 2008, BankAtlantic transferred non-performing loans to a work-out subsidiary of the
Parent Company. The composition of these loans as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was as
follows (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Nonaccrual loans: |
||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||
Residential |
$ | 5,837 | 8,985 | |||||
Land |
5,523 | 5,523 | ||||||
Total non-accrual loans |
11,360 | 14,508 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(814 | ) | (830 | ) | ||||
Non-accrual loans, net |
10,546 | 13,678 | ||||||
Performing other commercial loans |
2,698 | 2,811 | ||||||
Loans receivable, net |
$ | 13,244 | 16,489 | |||||
Real estate owned |
$ | 8,835 | 10,160 | |||||
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Parent Company foreclosed on a $1.5 million
commercial residential loan and sold a $1.7 million loan for a $99,000 loss. The work-out
subsidiary also received $0.1 million of loan principal repayments during the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and recognized a $20,000 recovery on a loan transferred to REO.
The Parent Companys non-accrual loans include large loan balance lending relationships. Two
relationships account for 81.6% of the $11.4 million of non-accrual loans held by the Parent
Company at March 31, 2011. The following table outlines general information about these
relationships as of March 31, 2011 (in thousands):
Unpaid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | Recorded | Specific | Date loan | Date Placed | Default | Collateral | Date of Last | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationships | Balance | Investment (2) | Reserves | Originated | on Nonaccrual | Date | Type | Full Appraisal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
land |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 1 |
$ | 5,604 | 5,523 | 802 | Q4-2005 | Q4-2007 | Q4-2007 | Land | Q4-2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
Land Developers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationship No. 2 (1) |
20,000 | 3,488 | | Q1-2005 | Q4-2007 | Q1-2008 | Residential | Q4-2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 25,604 | 9,011 | 802 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | During 2008, 2009 and 2010, the Company recognized partial charge-offs on relationship No. 2 aggregating $16.0 million. | |
(2) | Recorded investment is the Unpaid Principal Balance less charge-offs and deferred fees. |
The loans that comprise the above relationships are all collateral dependent. As such,
we established specific reserves or recognized partial charge-offs on these loans based on the fair
value of the underlying collateral less costs to sell. The fair value of the collateral was
determined using third party appraisals for all relationships. Management performs quarterly
impairment analyses on these credit relationships subsequent to the date of the appraisal and may
reduce appraised values if market conditions significantly deteriorate subsequent to the appraisal
date. However, our policy is to obtain a full appraisal within one year from the date of the prior
appraisal, unless the loan is in the process of foreclosure. A full appraisal is generally
obtained at the date of foreclosure.
94
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The activity in the Parent Companys allowance for loan losses was as follows (in thousands):
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 830 | 13,630 | |||||
Loans charged-off |
| (4,302 | ) | |||||
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off |
4 | | ||||||
Net (charge-offs) |
4 | (4,302 | ) | |||||
Recovery for loan losses |
(20 | ) | (1,279 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 814 | 8,049 | |||||
The $4,000 recovery during the three months ended March 31, 2011 reflected funds received on
loans previously charged-off. The recovery for loan losses primarily related to a $16,000
reduction of a specific valuation allowance on one loan.
The $4.3 million of charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2010 primarily related
to two loans. One loan was charged-down $2.7 million upon the foreclosure and sale of the
collateral. The other loans entire balance of $1.2 million was charged-off upon the sale of the
remaining collateral. The Parent Company established specific reserves of $5.7 million on these
two loans in prior periods and recognized a recovery for loan losses on the sale of these loans
during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
Currently, the Parent Companys principal source of liquidity is its cash and funds obtained
from its wholly-owned work-out subsidiary. The Parent Company also may obtain funds through the
issuance of equity and debt securities and through dividends, although no dividends from
BankAtlantic are anticipated or contemplated for the foreseeable future. The Parent Company has
used its funds to contribute capital to its subsidiaries, and fund operations, including funding
servicing costs and real estate owned operating expenses of its wholly-owned work-out subsidiary.
At March 31, 2011, BankAtlantic Bancorp had approximately $326.0 million of junior subordinated
debentures outstanding with maturities ranging from 2032 through 2037. The aggregate annual
interest obligations on this indebtedness totaled approximately $14.5 million based on interest
rates at March 31, 2011, which are generally indexed to three-month LIBOR. In order to preserve
liquidity in the current economic environment, the Parent Company elected in February 2009 to
commence deferring interest payments on all of its outstanding junior subordinated debentures and
to cease paying cash dividends on its common stock. The terms of the junior subordinated
debentures and the trust documents allow the Parent Company to defer payments of interest for up to
20 consecutive quarterly periods without default or penalty. During the deferral period, the
respective trusts have suspended the declaration and payment of dividends on the trust preferred
securities. The deferral election began as of March 2009, and regularly scheduled quarterly
interest payments aggregating $31.8 million that would otherwise have been paid during the 27
months ended March 31, 2011 were deferred. The Parent Company has the ability under the junior
subordinated debentures to continue to defer interest payments for up to another 11 consecutive
quarterly periods through ongoing appropriate notices to each of the trustees, and will make a
decision each quarter as to whether to continue the deferral of interest. During the deferral
period, interest will continue to accrue on the junior subordinated debentures at the stated coupon
rate, including on the deferred interest, and the Parent Company will continue to record the
interest expense associated with the junior subordinated debentures. During the deferral period,
the Parent Company may not, among other things and with limited exceptions, pay cash dividends on
or repurchase its common stock nor make any payment on outstanding debt obligations that rank
equally with or junior to the junior subordinated debentures. The Parent Company may end the
deferral period by paying all accrued and unpaid interest. The Parent Company anticipates that it
will continue to defer interest on its junior subordinated debentures and will not pay dividends on
its common stock for the foreseeable future. If the Parent Company continues to defer interest on
its junior subordinated debentures through the year ended December 31, 2013, it will owe an
aggregate of approximately $73.1 million of unpaid interest based on average interest rates as of
March 31, 2011. BankAtlantic Bancorps financial condition and liquidity could be adversely
affected if interest payments
continue to be deferred.
95
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The Parent Company has not received dividends from BankAtlantic since the year ended December
31, 2008. The ability of BankAtlantic to pay dividends or make other distributions to the Parent
Company in subsequent periods is subject to the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) approval as
provided in the Bank Order. It is unlikely that the OTS will approve a dividend from BankAtlantic
based on BankAtlantics regulatory capital levels. As such, the Parent Company does not expect to
receive cash dividends from BankAtlantic for the foreseeable future. The Parent Company may
receive dividends from its asset work-out subsidiary upon the monetizing of the subsidiaries
non-performing loans and real estate owned. However, the Parent Company may not be able to
monetize the loans or real estate owned on acceptable terms, if at all.
In February 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp filed a registration statement with the Securities and
Exchange Commission registering to offer, from time to time, up to $75 million of Class A Common
Stock, preferred stock, subscription rights, warrants or debt securities. A description of the
securities offered and the expected use of the net proceeds from any sales will be outlined in a
prospectus supplement if and when offered. As a result of the completion of a $20 million rights
offering during the year ended December 31, 2010, $55 million of securities remain available for
future issuance under this registration statement. On May 2, 2011, BankAtlantic Bancorp announced
its intention to pursue a rights offering for up to $30 million of Class A Common Stock. Under the
announced terms of the rights offering, holders of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock as of May 12, 2011 will have the right to purchase a prorata number of shares
of Class A Common Stock at a subscription price of $0.75 per share. The subscription rights are
currently anticipated to be exercisable until June 16, 2011, subject to extension. The rights
offering will be conducted under this registration statement and a description of the subscription
rights and the rights offering will be contained in a prospectus supplement and other materials
that will be sent to eligible shareholders. BankAtlantic Bancorp may decide not to pursue the
rights offering and may terminate the offering at any time, and if the rights offering is pursued,
it may not be consummated on the contemplated terms or at all.
In October 2010, BankAtlantic Bancorp filed a registration statement with the Securities and
Exchange Commission registering the offer and sale of up to $125 million of Class A Common Stock
through an underwritten public offering. This registration statement has not yet been declared
effective and it is uncertain whether BankAtlantic Bancorp will pursue the sale of any of the
shares of Class A Common Stock under this registration statement.
The Parent Company is generally required to provide BankAtlantic with managerial assistance
and capital. Any such financing could be sought through public or private offerings, including the
rights offering discussed above, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Additionally,
we could pursue financings at the Parent Company level or directly at BankAtlantic or both. Any
financing involving the issuance of our Class A Common Stock or securities convertible or
exercisable for our Class A Common Stock could be highly dilutive for our existing shareholders and
any issuance of stock at the BankAtlantic level would dilute BankAtlantic Bancorps ownership
interest in BankAtlantic. Such financing may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all.
The Parent Company has the following cash and investments that it believes provide a source
for potential liquidity based on values at March 31, 2011.
As of March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Value | Appreciation | Depreciation | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 13,112 | | | 13,112 | |||||||||||
Securities available for sale |
10 | | 2 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Private investment securities |
1,500 | | | 1,500 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 14,622 | | 2 | 14,620 | |||||||||||
96
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
The non-performing loans transferred to the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company may also
provide a potential source of liquidity through workouts, repayments of the loans or sales of
interests in the subsidiary. The
balance of these loans and real estate owned at March 31, 2011 was $22.1 million. During
the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Parent Company received net cash flows of $2.1 million
from its work-out subsidiary.
BankAtlantic Liquidity and Capital Resources
BankAtlantics primary sources of funds are deposits; principal repayments of loans, tax
certificates and securities available for sale; proceeds from the sale of loans, securities
available for sale and real estate owned; proceeds from securities sold under agreements to
repurchase; advances from FHLB; Treasury and Federal Reserve lending programs; interest payments
on loans and securities; capital contributions from the Parent Company and other funds generated
by operations. These funds are primarily utilized to fund loan disbursements and purchases,
deposit outflows, repayments of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, repayments of
advances from FHLB and other borrowings, purchases of tax certificates and securities available
for sale, acquisitions of properties and equipment, and operating expenses. BankAtlantics
liquidity will depend on its ability to generate sufficient cash to support loan demand, to meet
deposit withdrawals, and to pay operating expenses. BankAtlantics securities portfolio provides
an internal source of liquidity through its short-term investments as well as scheduled maturities
and interest payments. Loan repayments and loan sales also provide an internal source of
liquidity. BankAtlantic reduced its loan portfolio and securities portfolio during the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and reinvested the excess cash proceeds in cash equivalents in
anticipation of the pending sale of the Tampa branch network to PNC. BankAtlantics liquidity is
also dependent, in part, on its ability to maintain or increase deposit levels and availability
under lines of credit and Treasury and Federal Reserve lending programs. BankAtlantics ability to
increase or maintain deposits is impacted by competition from other financial institutions and
alternative investments as well as the current low interest rate environment. Such competition,
an increase in interest rates or an increase in liquidity needs, may require BankAtlantic to offer
higher interest rates to maintain deposits, which may not be successful in generating deposits,
and which would increase its cost of funds or reduce its net interest income. BankAtlantic is
restricted by the OTS from offering interest rates on its deposits which are significantly higher
than market area rates. Additionally, BankAtlantics current lines of credit may not be available
when needed as these lines of credit are subject to periodic review and may be terminated or
reduced at the discretion of the issuing institutions or reduced based on availability of
qualifying collateral. BankAtlantics unused lines of credit increased from $843 million as of
December 31, 2010 to $920 million as of March 31, 2011 due to lower FHLB advance outstanding
balances partially offset by lower loan balances. Additionally, interest rate changes, additional
collateral requirements, disruptions in the capital markets, deterioration in BankAtlantics
financial condition, litigation or regulatory action may make borrowings unavailable or make terms
of the borrowings and deposits less favorable. There is a risk that our cost of funds will
increase and that the borrowing capacity from funding sources may decrease.
The FHLB has granted BankAtlantic a line of credit capped at 30% of assets subject to
available collateral, with a maximum term of ten years. BankAtlantic utilized its FHLB line of
credit to borrow $45 million and to obtain a $268 million letter of credit primarily securing
public deposits as of March 31, 2011. The line of credit is secured by a blanket lien on
BankAtlantics residential mortgage loans and certain commercial real estate and consumer home
equity loans. BankAtlantics unused available borrowings under this line of credit were
approximately $589 million at March 31, 2011. An additional source of liquidity for BankAtlantic
is its securities portfolio. As of March 31, 2011, BankAtlantic had $297 million of unpledged
securities that could be sold or pledged for additional borrowings with the FHLB, the Federal
Reserve or other financial institutions. BankAtlantic is a participating institution in the
Federal Reserve Treasury Investment Program for up to $2.2 million in funding and at March 31,
2011, BankAtlantic had $1.4 million of short-term borrowings outstanding under this program.
BankAtlantic is also eligible to participate in the Federal Reserves discount window program under
its secondary credit program. The amount that can be borrowed under this program is dependent on
the delivery of collateral to the Federal Reserve, and BankAtlantic had unused available borrowings
of approximately $33.7 million as of March 31, 2011, with no amounts outstanding under this program
at March 31, 2011. We are not permitted to incur day-light overdrafts in our Federal Reserve bank
account and accordingly, our intent is to continue to maintain sufficient funds at the Federal
Reserve to support intraday activity. The above lines of credit are subject to periodic review and
any of the above borrowings may be limited, or may not be available to us at all or additional
collateral could be required, in which case BankAtlantics liquidity could be materially adversely
affected.
BankAtlantic also has various relationships to execute repurchase agreements, which may to a
limited
97
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
extent be utilized as an alternative source of liquidity. At March 31, 2011, BankAtlantic
had $17.0 million of securities sold under agreements to repurchase outstanding, representing 0.4%
of total assets. Additional repurchase agreement borrowings are subject to available collateral.
Additionally, BankAtlantic had total cash on hand or with
other financial institutions of $759.9 million at March 31, 2011.
Brokered deposits have previously served as an additional source of liquidity. Included in
deposits at March 31, 2011 was $10.8 million in brokered deposits. BankAtlantic is currently
restricted by the OTS from acquiring additional brokered deposits or renewing its existing brokered
deposits, and expects the balance of its brokered deposits to decline.
BankAtlantics liquidity may be affected by unforeseen demands on cash. Our objective in
managing liquidity is to maintain sufficient resources of available liquid assets to address our
funding needs. Multiple market disruptions and regulatory actions make it more difficult for us and
for financial institutions in general to borrow money. We cannot predict with any degree of
certainty how long these adverse market conditions may continue, nor can we anticipate the degree
that such market conditions may impact our operations. Deterioration in the performance of other
financial institutions may adversely impact the ability of all financial institutions to access
liquidity. Further deterioration in the financial markets may further impact us or result in
additional market-wide liquidity problems, and affect our liquidity position. We believe
BankAtlantic has improved its liquidity position during the year ended December 31, 2010 and the
three months ended March 31, 2011 by reducing assets, increasing agency guaranteed securities and
paying down borrowings.
BankAtlantics commitment to originate and purchase loans was $27.5 million and $13.0
million, respectively, at March 31, 2011 compared to $28.8 million of commitments to originate
loans at March 31, 2010. BankAtlantic had no commitments to purchase loans at March 31, 2010. At
March 31, 2011, total loan commitments represented approximately 1.4% of net loans receivable.
At March 31, 2011, BankAtlantic had mortgage-backed securities of approximately $29.9 million
pledged to secure securities sold under agreements to repurchase, public funds and short-term
borrowings. BankAtlantic also has $38.0 million of mortgage-backed securities pledged against
potential Federal Reserve Bank borrowings.
BankAtlantics actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the table below and are
compared to the prompt corrective action (PCA) well capitalized requirements and the capital
requirements set forth in the Bank Order that BankAtlantic must attain and maintain as of June 30,
2011 (dollars in thousands):
Bank Order | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
PCA Defined | Requirements | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Well Capitalized | By June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital |
$ | 319,159 | 11.77 | % | $ | 285,541 | 10.00 | % | $ | 379,909 | 14.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I risk-based capital |
$ | 262,613 | 9.68 | % | $ | 162,818 | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tangible capital |
$ | 262,613 | 5.97 | % | $ | 66,018 | 1.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tier 1/Core capital |
$ | 262,613 | 5.97 | % | $ | 222,240 | 5.00 | % | $ | 352,097 | 8.00 | % | ||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital |
$ | 334,601 | 11.72 | % | $ | 285,541 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tier I risk-based capital |
$ | 276,362 | 9.68 | % | $ | 171,325 | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tangible capital |
$ | 276,362 | 6.22 | % | $ | 66,672 | 1.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tier 1/Core capital |
$ | 276,362 | 6.22 | % | $ | 222,240 | 5.00 | % |
Pursuant to the Bank Order, BankAtlantic is required to attain by June 30, 2011 and maintain a
tier 1/core capital ratio equal to or greater than 8% and a total risk-based capital ratio equal to
or greater than 14%. BankAtlantic historically maintained its regulatory capital ratios at levels
that exceeded prompt corrective action well capitalized requirements; however, based on
BankAtlantics risk profile, the OTS raised its regulatory capital requirements above the well
capitalized amounts. The Parent Company and BankAtlantic will seek to meet the
98
Table of Contents
Financial Services
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
(BankAtlantic Bancorp)
higher capital
requirements of the Bank Order through the estimated financial impact upon consummation of the
proposed sale to PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. of BankAtlantics Tampa branch network and
through other efforts that may include the issuance of its Class A Common Stock through a public or
private offering, including
the rights offering to BankAtlantic Bancorps shareholders. Additionally, BankAtlantic may
continue to seek to reduce its asset size in order to improve its regulatory capital ratios,
although this may make it more difficult to achieve profitability. BankAtlantic Bancorp may not be
successful in raising additional capital in subsequent periods and the sale of the Tampa branches
may not be consummated in the time frame anticipated, upon the contemplated terms, or at all. The
inability to raise capital or otherwise meet regulatory requirements would have a material adverse
impact on BankAtlantic Bancorps business, results of operations and financial condition.
Contractual Obligations and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements as of March 31, 2011 were (in
thousands):
Payments Due by Period (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | After 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | 1 year | 1-3 years | 4-5 years | years | |||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
$ | 652,000 | 554,082 | 77,566 | 18,431 | 1,921 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
347,974 | | 53,779 | | 294,195 | |||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB (1) |
45,000 | 45,000 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations held for sublease |
18,180 | 847 | 1,618 | 1,592 | 14,123 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Tampa lease obligations |
26,981 | 1,701 | 3,174 | 2,944 | 19,162 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations held for use |
31,430 | 5,157 | 8,297 | 4,626 | 13,350 | |||||||||||||||
Pension obligation |
18,443 | 1,496 | 3,155 | 3,545 | 10,247 | |||||||||||||||
Other obligations |
14,006 | 4,406 | 6,400 | 3,200 | | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
$ | 1,154,014 | 612,689 | 153,989 | 34,338 | 352,998 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Payments due by period are based on contractual maturities | |
(2) | The above table excludes interest payments on interest bearing liabilities |
99
Table of Contents
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management evaluated, with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer,
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2011 to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules
and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
100
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Except as set forth below there have been no material changes in our legal proceedings from
those disclosed in the Legal Proceedings section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010.
BFC and its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries
AmTrust Bank v. Woodbridge Holdings, LLC and Carolina Oak Homes, LLC, United States District
Court for the Southern District of Florida
During November 2009, AmTrust Bank (AmTrust) filed an action against Woodbridge and Carolina Oak
alleging default under a promissory note and breach of a guaranty related to an approximately $37.2
million loan which was collateralized by property owned by Carolina Oak and as to which Woodbridge
was the obligor. During December 2009, the OTS closed AmTrust and appointed FDIC as receiver. The
FDIC subsequently sold the loan to an investor group. Effective April 26, 2011, Woodbridge and
Carolina Oak entered into a settlement agreement with the investor group to resolve the disputes
and litigation between them. Under the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement, (i)
Woodbridge paid $2.5 million to the investor group, (ii) Carolina Oak conveyed to the investor
group the real property securing the loan and (iii) the investor group agreed not to pursue certain
remedies, including a deficiency judgment, and after the expiration of an agreed-upon time period,
to fully release Woodbridge and Carolina Oak, in each case subject to certain conditions.
Robert D. Dance, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Woodbridge Holdings
Corp. (formerly known as Levitt Corp.), Alan B. Levan, and George P. Scanlon, Case No.
08-60111-Civ-Graham/OSullivan, Southern District of Florida
On January 25, 2008, plaintiff Robert D. Dance filed a purported class action complaint as a
putative purchaser of securities against Woodbridge and certain of its officers and directors,
asserting claims under the federal securities law and seeking damages. This action was filed in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and is captioned Dance v.
Levitt Corp. et al., No. 08-CV-60111-DLG. The securities litigation purports to be brought on
behalf of all purchasers of Woodbridges securities beginning on January 31, 2007 and ending on
August 14, 2007. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of
the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by issuing a series of false and/or
misleading statements regarding financial results, prospects and condition. During April 2011, a
preliminary agreement was reached to settle matter, pursuant to which Woodbridge would pay to the
plaintiffs a total of $1.95 million which amount is fully
insured without participation by the Company. The agreement does not contain any admission of responsibility
by Woodbridge or any other of the named defendants. The settlement remains subject to notice to
the class and approval by the presiding court, and may not be consummated on the contemplated
terms, or at all.
BankAtlantic Bancorp
In re BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 0:07-cv-61542-UU, United States
District Court, Southern District of Florida
On October 29, 2007, Joseph C. Hubbard filed a class action in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Florida against BankAtlantic Bancorp and five of its current or
former officers. The defendants in this action are BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., James A. White,
Valerie C. Toalson, Jarett S. Levan, John E. Abdo, and Alan B. Levan. The Complaint, which was
later amended, alleges that during the purported class period of November 9, 2005 through October
25, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp and the named officers knowingly and/or recklessly made
misrepresentations of material fact regarding BankAtlantic and specifically BankAtlantics loan
portfolio and allowance for loan losses. The Complaint sought to assert claims for violations of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 and unspecified damages. On December 12, 2007,
the Court consolidated into Hubbard a separately filed action captioned Alarm Specialties, Inc. v.
BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., No. 0:07cv-61623-WPD. On February 5, 2008, the Court appointed
State-Boston Retirement System lead plaintiff and Lubaton Sucharow LLP to serve as lead counsel
pursuant to the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.
On November 18, 2010, a jury returned a verdict awarding $2.41 per share to shareholders who
purchased shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock during the period of April 26, 2007
to October 26, 2007
101
Table of Contents
and retained those shares until the end of the period. The jury rejected the plaintiffs
claim for the six month period from October 19, 2006 to April 25, 2007. Prior to the beginning of
the trial, plaintiffs abandoned any claim for any prior period. On April 25, 2011, the Court
granted defendants post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law and vacated the jury verdict,
resulting in a judgment in favor of all defendants on all claims. On May 5, 2011, defendants filed
a motion for sanctions against plaintiffs and their counsel seeking reimbursement of their
attorneys fees and costs incurred in connection with this lawsuit. The Plaintiffs have indicated
that they intend to appeal the Courts order setting aside the jury verdict.
Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation
BankAtlantic Bancorp has received a notice of investigation from the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Miami Regional Office and subpoenas for information. The subpoenas request a broad
range of documents relating to, among other matters, recent and pending litigation to which
BankAtlantic Bancorp is or was a party, certain of BankAtlantic Bancorps non-performing,
non-accrual and charged-off loans, BankAtlantic Bancorps cost saving measures, loan
classifications, BankAtlantic Bancorps asset workout subsidiary, and the recent Orders with the
OTS entered into by BankAtlantic Bancorp Parent Company and BankAtlantic. Various current and
former employees have also received subpoenas for documents and testimony. BankAtlantic Bancorp is
fully cooperating with the SEC.
BankAtlantic Bancorp has received a letter from the Miami regional office staff of the SEC
indicating that the staff intends to recommend that the SEC bring a civil action against
BankAtlantic Bancorp alleging that BankAtlantic Bancorp violated certain provisions of federal
securities laws, including Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5
thereunder. BankAtlantic Bancorp has also been informed that its chief executive officer received
a similar letter. Although the letters do not state the grounds for such recommendations, in
communications between BankAtlantic Bancorps counsel and the Miami regional office staff,
BankAtlantic Bancorp has learned that the basis for the recommended actions were many of the same
arguments brought in the private class action securities litigation recently concluded at the
district court level in favor of BankAtlantic Bancorp and the individual defendants. In addition,
the Miami regional office staff raised issues relating to the classification and valuation of
certain loans included in BankAtlantic Bancorps financial information for the last quarter of 2007
and in its annual report on Form 10-K for the 2007 fiscal year. If litigation is brought, the SEC
may seek remedies including an injunction against future violations of federal securities laws,
civil money penalties and an officer and director bar. BankAtlantic Bancorp believes that it has
fulfilled all of its obligations under securities laws and, if such actions are brought by the SEC
against BankAtlantic Bancorp and/or any of its officers, such actions would be vigorously defended.
D.W. Hugo, individually and on behalf of Nominal Defendant BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. vs.
BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., Alan B. Levan, Jarett S. Levan, Jay C. McClung, Marcia K. Snyder,
Valerie Toalson, James A. White, John E. Abdo, D. Keith Cobb, Steven M. Coldren, and David A.
Lieberman, Case No. 0:08-cv-61018-UU, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
In July 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp, certain officers and Directors of BankAtlantic Bancorp
were named in a lawsuit which alleges that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary
duties by engaging in certain lending practices with respect to BankAtlantic Bancorps Commercial
Real Estate Loan Portfolio. The Complaint further alleges that BankAtlantic Bancorps public
filings and statements did not fully disclose the risks associated with the Commercial Real Estate
Loan Portfolio and seeks damages on behalf of BankAtlantic Bancorp. The case has been stayed
pending final resolution of the class action securities litigation.
On May 6, 2011, the Court instructed plaintiffs counsel to narrow the claims and defendants
in accord with the Courts rulings in In re BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. Securities Litigation. The
Court then invited defendants to move for summary judgment as to any remaining of such claims and
defendants, and expressed considerable doubt as to the viability of any claims in light of the
judgments entered in favor of defendants in the securities class action. Based on the Courts
instructions, BankAtlantic Bancorp believes this case will be resolved favorably to them and the
individual defendants.
102
Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Except as set forth below there have been no material changes in the risks and
uncertainties that we face from those disclosed in the Risk Factors section of our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The loss of BankAtlantic Bancorps key personnel or the failure to attract and retain highly
qualified personnel could adversely affect BankAtlantic Bancorps operations.
BankAtlantic Bancorp performance is largely dependent on the talents and efforts of skilled
individuals. There is intense competition in the financial services industry for qualified
employees. BankAtlantic Bancorp also faces increasing competition with businesses outside the
financial services industry for the most highly skilled individuals. In addition, BankAtlantic
Bancorps recent losses, reductions in force and other efforts to achieve operating efficiencies as
well as the concerns about the stability of financial institutions in general may make it more
difficult to retain key personnel. BankAtlantic Bancorp business operations could be adversely
affected if BankAtlantic Bancorp is unable to retain and motivate its existing employees and
attract new employees as needed.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit 31.1 *
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 31.2 *
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 31.3 *
|
Chief Accounting Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 32.1 **
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 32.2 **
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 32.3 **
|
Chief Accounting Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* | Exhibits filed with this Form 10-Q | |
** | Exhibits furnished with this Form 10-Q |
103
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BFC FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
||||
Date: May 16, 2011 | By: | /s/ Alan B. Levan | ||
Alan B. Levan, Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: May 16, 2011 | By: | /s/ John K. Grelle | ||
John K. Grelle, Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Date: May 16, 2011 | By: | /s/ Maria R. Scheker | ||
Maria R. Scheker, Chief Accounting Officer | ||||