Boxlight Corp - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017

OR

For the transition period from ______________ to ______________

Commission file number: 001-37564

BOXLIGHT CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

BOXLIGHT CORPORATION

1045 Progress Circle

Lawrenceville, Georgia 30043

Phone: (678) 367-0809

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of the registrant’s principal executive offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. [  ]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $_________

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock on March 28, 2018 was 9,648,198.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

BOXLIGHT CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (including the section regarding Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Results of Operation) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. These statements are based on our management’s belief and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, these statements relate to future events or our future financial performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements include statements concerning the following:

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect results. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, those listed in the reports we file with the SEC. Actual events or results may vary significantly from those implied or projected by the forward-looking statements due to these risk factors. No forward-looking statement is a guarantee of future performance. You should read this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents that we reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and have filed as exhibits thereto with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, with the understanding that our actual future results and circumstances may be materially different from what we expect.

Forward-looking statements are made based on management’s beliefs, estimates and opinions on the date the statements are made and we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements if these beliefs, estimates and opinions or other circumstances should change, except as may be required by applicable law. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.

Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” in this report refer to Boxlight Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.

PART I

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

We are a global leading distributor of interactive projectors, high definition interactive LED flat panels, and integrated classroom accessory products. We believe we offer the most comprehensive and integrated line of interactive display solutions, audio products, peripherals and accessories for schools and enterprises. Our products are backed by nearly 30 years of research and development. We introduced the world’s first interactive projector in 2007 and received patents in 2010. We focus on developing easy-to-use solutions combining interactive displays with robust software to enhance the educational environment, ease the teacher technology burden, and focus on improving student outcomes.

Advances in technology and new options for introduction into the classroom have forced school districts to look for solutions that allow teachers and students to bring their own devices into the classroom, provide school district information technology departments with the means to access data with or without internet access, handle the demand for video, and control cloud and data storage challenges. Our design teams are able to quickly customize systems and configurations to serve the needs of clients so that existing hardware and software platforms can communicate with one another. We have created plug-ins for annotative software that make existing and legacy hardware interactive and allows interactivity with or without wires through our MimioTeach product. Our goal is to become a single source solution to satisfy the needs of educators around the globe and provide a wholistic approach to the modern classroom.

We pride ourselves in providing industry-leading service and support and have received numerous product awards. Our STEM product, Labdisc, won the BETT Awards 2018 in the tools for teaching, learning and assessment category. In 2017, our MimioStudio with MimioMobile was a BETT Awards finalist in the tools for teaching, learning and assessment area. Our Labdisc product was named Best of BETT 2017 for the Tech & Learning award. In 2017 our Labdisc product won Best In Show at TCEA. Our P12 Projector Series won the Tech & Learning best in show award at ISTE in 2017. Our MimioMobile App with Mimio Studio Classroom Software won the 2016 Cool Tool Award. We received the 2016 Award of Excellence for our MimioTeach at the 34^th Tech & Learning Awards of Excellence program honoring new and upgraded software.

Since the Company launched its patented interactive projectors in 2007, we have sold them to public schools in the United States and in 49 other countries, as well as to the Department of Defense International Schools, and in approximately 3,000 classrooms in 20 countries, the Job Corp, the Library of Congress, the Center for Disease Control, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, nine foreign governments and the City of Moscow and numerous Fortune 500 companies, including Verizon, GE Healthcare, Pepsico, First Energy, ADT, Motorola, First Data and Transocean and custom built 4,000 projectors for the Israeli Defense Forces.

Our Company

Boxlight Corporation was incorporated in Nevada on September 18, 2014 for the purpose of acquiring technology companies that sell interactive products into the education market. As of the date of this Annual Report, we have three subsidiaries, consisting of Boxlight, Inc., Boxlight Latinoamerica, S.A. DE C.V. and Boxlight Latinamerica Servicios, S.A. DE C.V.

Effective April 1, 2016, Boxlight Corporation acquired Mimio LLC (“Mimio”). Mimio designs, produces and distributes a broad range of Interactive Classroom Technology products primarily targeted at the global K-12 education market. Mimio’s core products include interactive projectors, interactive flat panel displays, interactive touch projectors, touchboards and MimioTeach, which can turn any whiteboard interactive within 30 seconds. Mimio’s product line also includes an accessory document camera, teacher pad for remote control and an assessment system. Mimio was founded on July 11, 2013 and maintained its headquarters in Boston, Massachusetts. Manufacturing is by ODM’s and OEM’s in Taiwan and China. Mimio products have been deployed in over 600,000 classrooms in dozens of countries. Mimio’s software is provided in over 30 languages. Effective October 1, 2016 Mimio LLC was merged into Boxlight Inc.

Effective May 9, 2016, Boxlight Corporation acquired Genesis Collaboration LLC (“Genesis”). Genesis is a value added reseller of interactive learning technologies, selling into the K-12 education market in Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, northern Florida, western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee. Genesis also sells our interactive solutions into the business and government markets in the United States. Effective August 1, 2016, Genesis was merged into Boxlight Inc.

Effective July 18, 2016, Boxlight Corporation acquired Boxlight, Inc., Boxlight Latinoamerica, S.A. DE C.V. (“BLA”) and Boxlight Latinoamerica Servicios, S.A. DE C.V. (“BLS”) (together, “Boxlight Group”). The Boxlight Group sells and distributes a suite of patented, award-winning interactive projectors that offer a wide variety of features and specifications to suit the varying needs of instructors, teachers and presenters. With an interactive projector, any wall, whiteboard or other flat surface becomes interactive. A teacher, moderator or student can use the included pens or their fingers as a mouse to write or draw images displayed on the surface. As with interactive whiteboards, interactive projectors accommodate multiple users simultaneously. Images that have been created through the projected interactive surface can be saved as computer files. The new Company’s new ProjectoWrite 12 series, launched in February 2016, allows the simultaneous use of up to ten simultaneous points of touch.

We are a leading technology company that focuses on the education and learning industry. We produce and distribute products including interactive projectors, 65”-98” ultra hi-resolution interactive LED panels, integrated STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics) data logging products, and develop new products utilizing a combination of technologies utilizing Boxlight’s intellectual property portfolio. We invest in significant research and development, leverage our international manufacturing capabilities, and utilize an established global reseller network. Our goal is to become a single source, world-leading innovator, manufacturer and integrator of interactive products for schools and universities, as well as for training and instruction for business and governmental agencies.

The organizational structure of our companies is as follows:

Our Markets

In the United States, which is our primary market, we sell and distribute interactive educational products for K-12 to both public and private schools, the K-12 education sector represents one of the largest industry segments. In addition to its size, the U.S. K-12 education market is highly decentralized and is characterized by complex content adoption processes. The sector is comprised of approximately 15,600 public school districts across the 50 states and 132,000 public and private elementary and secondary schools. We believe this market structure underscores the importance of scale and industry relationships and the need for broad, diverse coverage across states, districts and schools. Even while we believe certain initiatives in the education sector, such as the Common Core State Standards, a set of shared math and literacy standards benchmarked to international standards, have increased standardization in K-12 education content, we believe significant state standard specific customization still exists, and we believe the need to address customization provides an ongoing need for companies in the sector to maintain relationships with individual state and district policymakers and expertise in state-varying academic standards.

U.S. K-12 education has come under significant political scrutiny in recent years, due to the recognition of its importance to U.S. society at large and concern over the perceived decline in U.S. student competitiveness relative to international peers. An independent task force report published in March 2012 by the Council on Foreign Relations, a non-partisan membership organization and think tank, observed that American students rank far behind global leaders in international tests of literacy, math and science, concluding that the current state of U.S. education severely impairs the United States’ economic, military and diplomatic security as well as broader components of America’s global leadership. Also, the Executive Office of the President Council of Economic Advisors, in a report titled Unleashing the Potential of Educational Technology, stated that “many observers are concerned about declines in the relative quality of U.S. primary and secondary education, and improving performance of our schools has become a national priority.” We believe that the customization of learning programs could enhance innovative and growth strategies geared towards student performance in our nation’s schools.

The global education industry is undergoing a significant transition, as primary and secondary school districts, colleges and universities, as well as governments, corporations and individuals around the world are increasingly recognizing the importance of using technology to more effectively provide information to educate students and other users.

According to “All Global Market Education & Learning”, an industry publication, the market for hardware products is growing due to increases in the use of interactive whiteboards and simulation-based learning hardware. Educational institutions have become more receptive to the implementation of hi-tech learning tools. The advent of technology in the classroom has enabled multi-modal training and varying curricula. In general, technology based tools help develop student performance when integrated with the curriculum. The constant progression of technology in education has helped educators to create classroom experiences that are interactive, developed and collaborative.

According to market research report “Markets and Markets Interactive Projector Market” 2016 research report, the interactive projector market was valued at $670 million in 2015 and is expected to reach $2,602 million by 2022, growing at a CAGR of 21.5% between 2016 and 2022. The increasing adoption of interactive projectors in the education segment, the low cost of interactive projectors compared to interactive whiteboards, and significant advantages of interactive projectors over conventional projectors are some of the factors that are driving the growth of the interactive market. Low awareness of the consumers regarding interactive projectors in developing countries restrains the growth of the market in those areas. The major players in the interactive projector market include Seiko Epson Corp. (Japan), BenQ Corp. (Taiwan), Boxlight (U.S.), Dell Technologies Inc. (U.S.), Panasonic Corp. (Japan), CASIO COMPUTER Co., Ltd. (Japan), NEC Display Solutions, Ltd. (Japan), Optoma Technology Inc. (U.S.), Touchjet Inc. (Singapore), and Delta Electronics Inc. (Taiwan).

Our Opportunity

We believe that our patented product portfolios and the software and products we intend to develop either alone or in collaboration with other technology companies positions us to be a leading manufacturer and provider of interactive educational products in the global educational and learning market. We believe that increased consumer spending driven by the close connection between levels of educational attainment, evolving standards in curriculum, personal career prospects and economic growth will increase the demand for our interactive educational products. Some of the factors that we believe will impact our opportunity include:

Growth in U.S. K-12 Market Expenditures

Significant resources are being devoted to primary and secondary education, both in the United States and abroad. As set forth in the Executive Office of the President, Council of Economic Advisers report, U.S. education expenditure has been estimated at approximately $1.3 trillion, with K-12 education accounting for close to half ($625 billion) of this spending. Global spending is roughly triple U.S. spending for K-12 education.

While the market has historically grown above the pace of inflation, averaging 7.2% growth annually since 1969, as expenditures by school districts and educational institutions are largely dependent upon state and local funding, the world-wide economic recession caused many states and school districts to defer spending on educational materials, which materially and adversely affected our historical revenues as well as those of many of our competitors. However, expenditures and growth in the U.S. K-12 market for educational content and services now appears to be rebounding in the wake of the U.S. economic recovery. Although, the economic recovery has been slower than anticipated, and there is no assurance that any further improvement will be significant, nonetheless, states such as Florida, California and Texas were all scheduled to adopt interactive educational materials for certain subjects, including reading and math, by 2016.

International Catalysts Driving Adoption of Learning Technology

According to Ambient Insights 2012 Snapshot of the Worldwide and US Academic Digital Learning Market, substantial growth in revenues for e-learning products in the academic market segment are anticipated throughout the world due to several convergent catalysts, including population demographics such as significant growth in numbers of 15-17 year old students and women in education in emerging markets; government-funded education policies mandating country-wide deployment of digital learning infrastructures; large scale digitization efforts in government and academic markets; significant increases in the amount of digital learning content; migration to digital formats by major educational publishers and content providers; mass purchases of personal learning devices and strong demand for learning platforms, content and technology services; and rapid growth of part-time and fulltime online student enrollments.

Rising Global Demand

We expect to profit from the rising global demand for technology based learning products by offering our interactive product hardware and software in the United States and expanding into foreign countries. In recent years, the global education sector has seen movement towards the adoption of interactive learning devices. As examples:

Growth in the E-learning Market

According to the “E-learning Market – Global Outlook and Forecast 2018-2023”

The introduction of technology-enabled learning that helps organizations train human resource is driving the growth of the global e-learning market. These training modules offer continuous and effective learning at an optimal cost and provide customized course content that meets the specific requirements of end-users. The advent of cloud infrastructure, peer-to-peer problem solving, and open content creation will help to expand business opportunities for service providers in the global e-learning market.

Vendors are also focusing on offering choices on the course content at competitive prices to gain the share in the global e-learning market. The exponential growth in the number of smartphone users and internet connectivity across emerging markets is driving the e-learning market in these regions. The introduction of cloud-based learning and AR/VR mobile-based learning is likely to revolutionize the e-learning market during the forecast period.

Major vendors are introducing technology-enabled tools that can facilitate the user engagement, motivate learners, and help in collaborations, thereby increasing the market share and attracting new consumers to the market. The growing popularity of blended learning that enhances the efficiency of learners will drive the growth of the e-learning market. The e-learning market is expected to generate revenue of $65.41 billion by 2023, growing at a CAGR of 7.07% during the forecast period.

Trends in Tech-Savvy Education

While industries from manufacturing to health care have adopted technology to improve their results, according to Stanford Business School, in its Trends in Tech-Savvy Education, the education field remains heavily reliant on “chalk and talk” instruction conducted in traditional settings; however, that is changing as schools and colleges adopt virtual classrooms, data analysis, online games, highly customized coursework, and other cutting-edge tools to help students learn.

Demand for Interactive Projectors is on the Rise

The interactive projector market was valued at $670.3 million in 2015 and is expected to reach $2.602M by 2022, growing at a CAGR of 21.5% between 2016 and 2022. The factors which are driving the growth of market include significant advantages of interactive projectors over conventional projectors, increased adoption of interactive projectors in the education segment, and the low cost of projectors compared to interactive whiteboards.

Additional Technologies

The delivery of digital education content is also driving a substantial shift in the education market. In addition to whiteboards, interactive projectors and interactive flat panels, other technologies are being adapted for educational uses on the Internet, mobile devices and through cloud-computing, which permits the sharing of digital files and programs among multiple computers or other devices at the same time through a virtual network. We intend to be a leader in the development and implementation of these additional technologies to create effective digital learning environments.

Handheld Device Adoption

Handheld devices, including smartphones, tablets, e-readers and digital video technologies, are now fundamental to the way students communicate. A 2010 FCC survey provides evidence that the rates of handheld use will increase dramatically. It reported that while 50% of respondents currently use handhelds for administrative purposes, 14% of schools and 24% of districts use such devices for academic or educational purposes. Furthermore, 45% of respondents plan to start using such devices for academic and educational purposes within the next 2 to 3 years. The survey stated that, “The use of digital video technologies to support curriculum is becoming increasingly popular as a way to improve student engagement.”

Natural User Interfaces (NUIs)

Tablets and the new class of “smart TVs” are part of a growing list of other devices built with natural user interfaces that accept input in the form of taps, swipes, and other ways of touching; hand and arm motions; body movement; and increasingly, natural language. Natural user interfaces allow users to engage in virtual activities with movements similar to what they would use in the real world, manipulating content intuitively. The idea of being able to have a completely natural interaction with a device is not new, but neither has its full potential been realized. For example, medical students increasingly rely on simulators employing natural user interfaces to practice precise manipulations, such as catheter insertions, that would be far less productive if they had to try to simulate sensitive movements with a mouse and keyboard. NUIs make devices seem easier to use and more accessible, and interactions are far more intuitive, which promotes exploration and engagement. (NMC Horizon Project Technology Outlook STEM+ Education 2012-2017).

The Business and Government Market

The business and government market for interactive displays represents an attractive growth opportunity for us because of the desire of organizations to improve the quality of training, development and collaboration.

In meeting rooms, our solutions help achieve the following:

In training centers, we believe that our solutions help to enhance achievement levels with multi-modality (visual, auditory and kinesthetic) learning capabilities, improved interactivity and engagement and real-time assessment and feedback. Our solutions may also help improve an enterprise’s return on investment by providing better trained employees reducing training time and getting employees back to their jobs, reduced travel expenses, improved customers service from well-trained employees and reduced employee turnover.

Federal and State Funding According to “State of the K-12 Market Reports 2016”

New Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grant (SSAEG) dollars will likely begin to expand the market somewhat in the 2017-2018 school year. SSAEG is a new funding mechanism that provides flexible funding focused on efforts to promote a well-rounded education, create safe and healthy learning environments for students, and support the effective use of technology. Congress initially authorized SSAEG at $1.6 billion.

Despite the attention paid to the federal education budget, school funding continues to come primarily from state and local sources. For the 2014-2015 school year, state funding provided nearly half (46%) of total funding for K-12 schools, with local funding providing 44% of K-12 funding. The federal contribution was an average of 10%. Overall funding for all public and private K-12 education in the United States is currently about $665 billion.

States spend a significant amount of their overall budgets to support education. According to the National Association of State Budget Officers, states devote 20% of their overall spending to K-12 education. In FY2016, 41 states enacted spending increases for K-12 education resulting in a net increase of $14.7 billion, up from an $11.1 billion increase in FY2015. Thirty-five states also enacted spending increases for higher education. Only four states—Alaska, Hawaii, West Virginia, and Wisconsin—cut K-12 spending in FY2016.

Governors in 43 states called for higher spending in their FY2017 budget recommendations. As has been true for several years, governors’ proposed budgets direct most additional dollars to K-12 funding and Medicaid, the two largest areas of state general fund expenditures.

The Fiscal Survey of States, Spring 2016 confirms that state budgets continue to show moderate growth and stability. FY2016 (July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016) marked the first time that aggregate spending levels surpassed the pre-recession peak level of FY2008, adjusted for inflation. For the most part, states have been able to close budget gaps and minimize mid-year budget cuts. Unemployment rates are going down, rainy day funds are growing, and states are focused on resolving issues around unfunded pension programs, ongoing health care and education costs, and pent-up infrastructure demand. Enacted 2016 budgets showed state revenues reaching $798 billion, an increase of 4%, compared with the 3% gain in fiscal 2015, when revenues stood at $748 billion. Revenue growth was widespread: 43 states enacted spending increases in FY2016, compared with 2015 levels. A small number of states face revenue shortfalls brought on by the decline in oil and natural gas prices.

Technology Budget Outlook Per “State of the K-12 Market Reports 2016”

The outlook for district technology budgets in the 2016-2017 school year continues the improvement seen last year, confirming schools’ emergence from the long shadow of the recession. Tech directors generally have quite positive expectations about their 2016-2017 budget. Compared with the prior two years, the 2016-2017 outlook is generally strong. Clearly technology directors are making some trade-offs from year to year, increasing spending in one category and balancing that increase by holding steady or slightly decreasing other categories.

Even in the schools’ worst recession years of 2010-2011 through 2012-2013, hardware and teacher training were most likely to see the largest percentage of districts planning to increase spending. The implementation of Common Core assessments likely drove some of this investment in hardware and teacher training in the past; however, the desire to increase overall student access to technology also plays a role. Districts may not be saying that one-to-one is their goal, but they continue to move in that direction. Their budget plans also reflect a clear awareness that teacher training is an essential element of any expansion of technology use.

District characteristics (size, metropolitan status, and region) are sometimes associated with differences in plans for technology spending. While no significant differences are seen by metropolitan status of region, looking at projected increases by district size reveals a difference in budget plans for hardware purchases. Medium-size districts are significantly more likely than their smaller counterparts to be planning increases in hardware budgets.

Our Current Products

We currently offer the following products:

MimioStudio Interactive Instructional Software

MimioStudio Interactive Instructional Software enables the creation, editing, and presentation of interactive instructional lessons and activities. These lessons and activities can be presented and managed from the front of the classroom using any of Boxlight’s front of classroom display systems including MimioTeach + our non-interactive projectors, ProColor Interactive LED panels, MimioBoard Touch + our non-interactive projectors, MimioFrame + our non-interactive projectors or ProjectoWrite “P” Series interactive projectors in either pen or touch controlled versions. MimioStudio can also be operated using MimioPad as a full-featured remote control or a mobile device such as an iPad or tablet which includes a display screen that fully replicates the front-of-classroom display generated by MimioStudio. Operation with a mobile device is enabled via the three-user license for MimioMobile, see next, provided with the MimioStudio license that accompanies all front-of-classroom devices from Mimio.

MimioMobile Collaboration and Assessment Application

The introduction of MimioMobile, a software accessory for MimioStudio, in 2014 introduced a new era of fully interactive student activities that are able to be directly and immediately displayed on the front-of-classroom interactive displays through MimioStudio.

MimioMobile allows fully interactive activities to be pushed to student classroom devices. The students can manipulate objects within the activities, annotate “on top” of them, and even create completely new content on their own handheld devices. MimioMobile also enables assessment using the mobile devices. The teacher can create multiple choice, true\false, yes\no, and text entry assessment questions. The students can respond at their own speed and their answers are stored within MimioStudio from which the teacher can display graphs showing student results. This “continuous assessment” allows formative assessment that can help guide the teacher as to whether to re-teach the material if understanding is low or move forward in the lesson. We believe that this interactive and student dependent instructional model can dramatically enhance student outcomes.

Boxlight Front-of-Classroom Interactive Displays

Boxlight offers the broadest line of interactive displays, each of which provides large image size and interactive technology that complements the capabilities of MimioStudio and MimioMobile.

Boxlight Interactive Projectors

We offer a suite of patented, award-winning interactive projectors with a wide variety of features and specifications to suit the varying needs of instructors, teachers and presenters around the world. With an interactive projector any wall , whiteboard or other flat surface can become an interactive surface and enable computer control. A user can utilize a pen stylus or finger as a mouse or to write or draw images displayed on the screen. As with interactive whiteboards, the interactive projector accommodates multiple users simultaneously. Images that have been created through the projectors can be saved as computer files. Except for the ProjectorWrite 12 series, all the Boxlight Group interactive projectors use LCD or DLP technology.

We offer interactive projectors using lamp and laser illumination technologies. Each ultra-short throw model is available with pen-based interactivity using infra-red emitting pens or touch-based technology using an emitter that generates a laser curtain over the entire surface of an associated whiteboard.

The pen versions of these interactive projectors can display images as large as 130” diagonally in 16:10 aspect ratio. The touch-based versions can display images as large as 100” in the same 16:10 aspect ratio. All models support up to ten simultaneous interactions meaning multiple students can simultaneously work. The projectors come with high quality audio and appropriate wall mounting hardware.

The ProjectoWrite 9 series provides wired interactivity and features 60 frames per second. These projectors have built-in storage of up to 1.5 GB for on-the-go display; a USB or EZ WiFi LAN connection from the PC, Mac or mobile device to the interactive projector is required for interactivity with the projected images. The ProjectoWrite 9 interactive projector series allows for a maximum of ten interactive pens working simultaneously. Utilizing its patented embedded interactive CMOS camera at 60 frames per second, response time is less than 12 ms., and accuracy is within 3 pixels.

The ProjectoWrite 12 series is first in the Boxlight Group’s line of patented  finger-touch interactive projectors to offer a driverless installation. With the addition of a laser module, a moderator or student can use a finger, or any solid object, to interact and control the computer at the projected image. With 10-point touch, a user can capitalize on the new touch features of Microsoft Windows 10, emulating a tablet computer.

Boxlight ProColor Interactive Flat Panel Displays

Our ProColor series of interactive LED panels are available in five sizes of Interactive Flat Panel Displays – 55”, 65”, 70”, 75”, and 86” measured diagonally. Each offers a 4K resolution, and an optional PC Module slot for embedded Windows 10 and also include embedded Android computing capability for control, applications, and annotation that produce extraordinarily sharp images suitable for a range of classroom sizes. ProColor Interactive LED panels utilize infrared touch tracking technology, offering 10 points of touch for simultaneous interaction of multiple users. ProColor’s built-in speakers add room filling sound to the display’s vivid colors. The interactive LED panels feature Korean  glass with optical coatings that are highly scratch resistant and improve viewing angles and ambient light interference.

ProColor Display 490 Interactive Touch Table

The ProColor Display 490 Interactive Touch Table enables up to four students to work collaboratively or individually on a horizontal surface particularly well-suited to younger students or those with motor skill limitations. The height of the table can be adjusted electrically to accommodate a wide range of student ages and even wheelchairs.

Boxlight’s MimioBoard Interactive Touch Boards

Boxlight’s Interactive Touch Boards are available in 78” 4:3 aspect ratio and 87” 16:10 aspect ratio. These boards provide sophisticated interactivity with any projector because the touch interactivity is built into the board. Unlike many competitive products, Boxlight’s touch boards are suited for use with dry erase markers. Many competitive products advise against using dry erase markers because their boards stain. Boxlight’s touch boards use a porcelain-on-steel surface for durability and dry erase compatibility.

Boxlight’s MimioTeach Interactive Whiteboard

Boxlight’s MimioTeach is one of the company’s best known and longest-lived products. Hundreds of thousands of MimioTeach interactive whiteboards and its predecessor models are used in classrooms around the world. MimioTeach can turn any whiteboard (retrofit) into an interactive whiteboard in as little as 30 seconds. This portable product fits into a tote bag with room for a small desktop projector, which is attractive to teachers who move from classroom to classroom. For schools where “change is our normal,” MimioTeach eliminates the high cost of moving fixed-mount implementations

Boxlight’s MimioFrame retro-fittable Touch Board

Boxlight’s MimioFrame can turn a conventional whiteboard into a touchboard in 10-15 minutes. Millions of classrooms already have a conventional whiteboard and a non-interactive projector. MimioFrame user infrared (IR) technology embedded in the four sides of the frame to turn that non-interactive combination into a modern 10-touch-interactive Digital Classroom. No drilling or cutting is required, MimioFrame easily and quickly attaches with industrial-strength double-sided tape.

Boxlight’s MimioSpace ultra-wide 135” TouchBoard System

MimioSpace combines a, eleven-foot-wide 32-touch interactive whiteboard with a 16:6 aspect ratio ultra-wide projector to produce an extraordinary combination of digital classroom technology and the extremely wide working surface of classical blackboard-based classrooms.

Peripherals and accessories

We offer a line of peripherals and accessories, including amplified speaker systems, mobile carts, installation accessories and adjustable wall-mount accessories that complement its entire line of interactive projectors, LED flat panels and standard projectors. The height and tilt adjustable DeskBoard  mobile cart, which won the Best of ISTE in June 2014 for Best Hardware product, can be used as an interactive screen or interactive desktop with the ProjectoWrite 8 ultra-short throw interactive projectors.

Boxlight’s MimioVote Student Assessment System

Boxlight’s MimioVote is a handheld “clicker” that enables student assessment with essentially zero training. MimioVote is so simple it genuinely qualifies as intuitive, an elusive and often proclaimed attribute that is actually merited by MimioVote. MimioVote fully integrates into the MimioMobile environment and offers everything from attendance to fully immersive and on-the-fly student assessment. The MimioVote was specifically designed to survive the rigors of even kindergarten and elementary classrooms where being dropped, stepped on, and kicked are all part of a normal day. The handset’s non-slip coating helps keep it from sliding off desktops or out of little hands. Should they take wing, the rugged construction keeps them working.

Boxlight’s MimioPad wireless pen tablet

MimioPad is a lightweight, rechargeable, wireless tablet used as a remote control for the MimioStudio running on a teacher’s Windows, Mac, or Linux computer. MimioPad enables the teacher to roam the classroom which significantly aids classroom management. MimioPad is a classroom management tool which can be handed off to enable a student to be part of the interactive experience – all without getting up and going to the front of the room.

Boxlight’s MimioView document camera

Boxlight’s MimioView is a document camera that is integrated with MimioStudio to make the combination easy to use with a single cable connection that carries power, video, and control. MimioView is fully integrated into our MimioStudio software solution and is controlled through the applications menu of the quick menu. With 2 clicks, the teacher or user can turn on, auto-focus, and illuminate the included LED lights for smooth high-definition images.

Audio Solutions

We offer SoundLite audio solutions as an affordable and easy-to-install amplified speaker system for use with all of our projectors. The 30 watt SoundLite product is available with a wireless RF microphone. This device produces quality stereo sound in any room.

Features in future SoundLite models will have a security-enabled system and IP addressable audio classroom solution allowing point-to-point address as well as a network wide area address. A panic switch on the wireless transmitters will enable live broadcast of classroom audio and simultaneously trigger predetermined alerts. This feature is designed to work over a school’s existing network infrastructure.

Non-Interactive projectors

We distribute a full line of standard, non-interactive projectors. The Cambridge Series features embedded wireless display functions and is available in short and standard throw options. Offering brightness from 2,700 to 4,000 lumens, we furnish projectors for small classrooms to large classrooms with the Cambridge platform. This series is available in both XGA and WXGA resolutions to replace projectors on existing interactive whiteboards in classrooms operating on limited budgets. The Boxlight Group has designed this platform to provide easy user maintenance with side-changing lamps and filters and developed HEPA filtration systems for harsh environments.

Over the past several years, we have together with strategic allies, provided customized products that fit specific needs of customers, such as the Israeli Ministry of Defense. Working with Nextel Systems, the Boxlight Group delivered approximately 4,000 projectors, with special kitting performance, asset tagging, custom start up screens, operating defaults appropriate for harsh environments, and other unique product specifications. the Boxlight Group also met requirements that each projector contain at least 51% U.S. content and be assembled in the United States. A service center was appointed in Israel to provide warranty service and support. The US Army in connection with the Israeli Defense Forces found the Boxlight Group to be the only manufacturer able to meet the stringent requirements, leading not only to the original multi-year contract, but to extensions for favorable execution and performance.

Integration Strategy

We have centralized our business management for all acquisitions through an enterprise resource planning system. We have streamlined the process to drive front-line sales forecasting to factory production. Through the enterprise resource planning system, we have synchronized five separate accounting and customer relationship management systems through a cloud-based interface to improve inter-company information sharing and allow management at the Company to have immediate access to snapshots of the performance of each of our subsidiaries. As we grow, organically or through acquisition, we plan to move to a multi-currency model of our enterprise resource planning system.

Logistics; Suppliers

Logistics is currently provided by our Lawrenceville, Georgia facility. Contract manufacturing for Boxlight’s products are through ODM and OEM partners according to specific engineering specifications and utilizing IP developed and owned by Boxlight. Boxlight’s factories for ODM and OEM are located in Taiwan, China and Germany.

Technical Support and Service

The Company currently has its technical support and service centers located near Seattle, WA and in Atlanta, GA. Additionally, the Company’s technical support division is responsible for the repair and closing of customer service cases, resulting in more than 60% of the Company’s customer service calls ending in immediate closure of the applicable service case. We accomplish this as a result of the familiarity between our products and the customer service technician.

Sales and Marketing

Our sales force consists of nine regional account managers in the US, two in Latin America, three in Europe, two sales support staff and one Vice President of Sales. Our marketing team consists of one Vice President of Global Marketing, One Vice President of Marketing Communications and Public Relations, one Marketing Coordinator and four contractors. Our sales force and marketing teams primarily drive sales of interactive flat panels, interactive whiteboards, interactive projectors, interactive touch table, education software, STEM data logging products and related peripherals and accessories to school districts, throughout North, Central and South America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. In addition, we go to market through an indirect channel distribution model and utilize traditional value-added resellers and support them with training to become knowledgeable about the products we sell. We currently have approximately 800 resellers.

We believe Boxlight offers the most comprehensive product portfolio in today’s education technology industry, along with best-in-class service and technical support. Boxlight’s award-winning, interactive classroom technology and easy to use line of classroom hardware and software solutions provide schools and districts with the most complete line of progressive, integrated classroom technologies available worldwide.

Competition

In the interactive education industry, we face substantial competition from developers, manufacturers and distributers of interactive learning products and solutions. The industry is highly competitive and characterized by frequent product introductions and rapid technological advances that have substantially increased the capabilities and use of interactive projectors and interactive whiteboards. We face increased competition from companies with strong positions in certain markets we serve, and in new markets and regions we may enter. These companies manufacture and/or distribute new, disruptive or substitute products that compete for the pool of available funds that previously could have been spent on interactive displays and associated products. Our ability to integrate our technologies and remain innovative and develop new technologies desired by our current and potential new contract manufacturing customers will determine our ability to grow our contract manufacturing divisions.

The Company competes with other developers, manufacturers and distributors of interactive projectors and personal computer technologies, tablets, television screens, smart phones. Interactive whiteboards, since first introduced, have evolved from a high-cost technology that involves multiple components, requiring professional installers, to a one-piece technology that is available at increasingly reduced price points and affords simple installations. With lowered technology entry barriers, we face heated competition from other interactive whiteboard developers, manufacturers and distributors. However, the market presents new opportunities in responding to demands to replace outdated and failing interactive whiteboards with more affordable and simpler solution interactive whiteboards. In addition, the Company has begun to see expansion in the market to sales of complementary products that work in conjunction with the interactive technology, including software, audio solutions, data capture, and tablets.

Employees

As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately 43 employees, of whom 4 are executives, 5 employees are engaged in product development, engineering and research and development, 16 employees are engaged in sales and marketing, 9 employees are engaged in administrative and clerical services and 9 employees are engaged in service and production. In addition, a total of approximately 8 individuals provide sales agency services to us as independent contractors.

None of our employees are represented by labor organizations. We consider our relationship with our employees to be excellent. A majority of our employees have entered into non-disclosure and non-competition agreements with us or our operating subsidiaries.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

As a “smaller reporting company,” this item is not required.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our corporate headquarters is located at 1045 Progress Circle, Lawrenceville, Georgia 30043, in a building of approximately 48,000 square feet, for which we pay approximately $20,000 per month as rent through March 2019. Our corporate headquarters house our administrative offices as well as distribution operations and assembly for the Boxlight brand.

We also maintain an office in Poulsbo, Washington, for sales, marketing, technical support and service staff.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock commenced trading on the NASDAQ Capital Market, or NASDAQ, under the symbol “BOXL” on November 30, 2017. Prior to that time, our common stock was not traded on any exchange or quoted on any over the counter market. The prices set forth below reflect the quarterly high and low sales prices per share for our common stock, as reported by the NASDAQ:

Holders

As of March 22, 2018, we have 407 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends, if any, declared and paid from time to time by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available. We intend to retain any earnings for the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future determination as to the payment of cash dividends will depend upon future earnings, results of operations, capital requirements, our financial condition and other factors that our Board of Directors may consider.

Equity Compensation Plans

Adoption of the 2014 Stock Option Plan

On September 19, 2014, prior to the listing of our common stock on NASDAQ, the Board approved the Company’s 2014 Stock Option Plan. The total number of underlying shares of the Company’s Class A common stock available for grant to directors, officers, key employees, and consultants of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company under the plan is 2,390,438 shares.

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2017 about our equity compensation plans and arrangements.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

Use of Proceeds

On January 30, 2017, a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-204811) was declared effective with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A Post-Effective Amendment to the Registration Statement was declared effective on August 29, 2017, for the sale of up to 1,000,000 shares of Class A common stock of the Company at an initial offering price of $7.00 per share. The offering was consummated on November 30, 2017 by the Company with Aegis Capital Corp, as the lead placement agent on a “best efforts” basis, without a firm commitment by Aegis, who had no obligation or commitment to purchase any of the Company’s shares. The Company received gross proceeds in the amount of $7,000,000.

From the effective date of the Registration Statement to December 31, 2017, we incurred actual expenses in the amount of approximately $1,034,000. We had net proceeds from the offering in the amount of $5,678,609 and converted accounts payable into common stock on IPO of $287,119.

We have used approximately $3,500,000 of the net proceeds as of December 31, 2017. The net proceeds were used to pay the Skyview Note, purchase inventory and for general working capital requirements.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere herein. The Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Any statements that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. When used, the words “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “target,” “estimate,” “expect,” and the like, and/or future-tense or conditional constructions (“will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” etc.), or similar expressions, identify certain of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements in this form. Our actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors including, but not limited to, those noted under “Risk Factors” of the reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this transition report.

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) contains certain forward-looking statements. Historical results may not indicate future performance. Our forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events, are based on assumptions and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by these statements. Factors that may cause differences between actual results and those contemplated by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those discussed in “Risk Factors.” We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, including any changes that might result from any facts, events, or circumstances after the date hereof that may bear upon forward-looking statements. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of activity, performance, or achievements.

Overview

We are a visual display technology company that is seeking to become a world leading innovator, and integrator of interactive products for schools, as well as for business and government conferencing. We currently design, produce and distribute interactive projectors and distribute interactive LED flat panels in the education market. We also distribute science, technology, engineering and math (or “STEM”) data logging products to the educational market.

To date, we have generated substantially all of our revenue from the sale of our software and expanding product line of projectors, LED panels, interactive whiteboards and display devices to the educational market.

In addition, we have implemented a comprehensive plan to reach profitability for our business acquisitions. Highlights of this plan include:

Acquisition Strategy and Challenges

Our growth strategy includes acquiring assets and technologies of companies that have products, technologies, industry specializations or geographic coverage that extend or complement our existing business. The process to undertake a potential acquisition is time-consuming and costly. We expect to expend significant resources to undertake business, financial and legal due diligence on our potential acquisition targets, and there is no guarantee that we will complete any acquisition that we pursue.

We believe we can achieve significant cost-savings by merging the operations of the companies we acquire and after their acquisition leverage the opportunity to reduce costs through the following methods:

As a result, we believe that an analysis of the historical costs and expenses of our Target Sellers prior to their acquisition will not provide guidance as to the anticipated results after acquisition. We anticipate that we will be able to achieve significant reductions in our costs of revenue and selling, general and administrative expenses from the levels currently incurred by the Target Sellers operating independently, thereby increasing our EBITDA and cash flows.

Components of our Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Revenue

Our revenue is comprised of product revenue, software revenue, installation revenue and professional development revenue.

Cost of revenue

Our cost of revenue is comprised of the following:

We outsource some of our warehouse operations and order fulfillment and purchase products from related and third parties. Our product costs will vary directly with volume and based on the costs of underlying product components as well as the prices we are able to negotiate with our contract manufacturers. Shipping costs fluctuate with volume as well as with the method of shipping chosen in order to meet customer demand. As a global company with suppliers centered in Asia and customers located worldwide, we have used, and may in the future use, air shipping to deliver our products directly to our customers. Air shipping is more costly than sea or ground shipping or other delivery options. We primarily use air shipping to meet the demand of our products during peak seasons and new product launches.

Gross profit and gross profit margin

Our gross profit and gross profit margin have been, and may in the future be, influenced by several factors including: product, channel and geographical revenue mix; changes in product costs related to the release of projector models; component, contract manufacturing and supplier pricing and foreign currency exchange. As we primarily procure our product components and manufacture our products in Asia, our suppliers incur many costs, including labor costs, in other currencies. To the extent that exchange rates move unfavorably for our suppliers, they may seek to pass these additional costs on to us, which could have a material impact on our future average selling prices and unit costs. Gross profit and gross profit margin may fluctuate over time based on the factors described above.

Operating expenses

We classify our operating expenses into two categories: research and development and general and administrative.

Research and development. Research and development expense consists primarily of personnel related costs, prototype and sample costs, design costs and global product certifications mostly for wireless certifications.

General and administrative. General and administrative expense consists of personnel related costs, which include salaries, as well as the costs of professional services, such as accounting and legal, facilities, information technology, depreciation and amortization and other administrative expenses. We expect our general and administrative expense to increase in absolute dollars following the completion of our initial public offering due to the anticipated growth of our business and related infrastructure as well as accounting, insurance, investor relations and other costs associated with becoming a public company. General and administrative expense may fluctuate as a percentage of revenue, notably in the second and third quarters of our fiscal year when we have historically experienced our highest levels of revenue.

Other income (expense), net

Other income (expense), net consists of interest expense associated with our debt financing arrangements and interest income earned on our cash. We do not utilize derivatives to hedge our foreign exchange risk, as we believe the risk to be immaterial to our results of operations.

Income tax expense

We are subject to income taxes in the United States and Mexico in which we do business. Mexico has a statutory tax rate different from those in the United States. Additionally, certain of our international earnings are also taxable in the United States. Accordingly, our effective tax rates will vary depending on the relative proportion of foreign to U.S. income, the absorption of foreign tax credits, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities and changes in tax laws. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from the examination of our tax returns by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, and other tax authorities to determine the adequacy of our income tax reserves and expense. Should actual events or results differ from our current expectations, charges or credits to our income tax expense may become necessary. Any such adjustments could have a significant impact on our results of operations.

Operating Results – Boxlight Corporation (Retrospectively adjusted for the acquisitions of Mimio and Genesis)

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

Revenues. Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $25,743,612 as compared to $20,371,826 for the year ended December 31, 2016. Revenues consist of product revenue, software revenue, installation and professional development. For the year ended December 31, 2016, Boxlight Group’s operating results were only included in the balances from their acquisition date on July 18, 2016 through December 31, 2016. Accordingly, the increase in revenues in 2017 is primarily attributable to the inclusion of Boxlight Group’s revenues for a full year in 2017.

Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $19,329,831 as compared to $12,959,749 for the year ended December 31, 2016. Cost of revenues consists primarily of product cost, freight expenses and inventory write-downs. Cost of revenues increased due to the increase in revenues. Another factor resulting in an increase in cost of revenues was the Company sold product in some instances at a lower margin in exchange for improved payment terms. Freight expenses as a component of cost of revenues increased approximately $1.7 million in 2017 due to alternative freight arrangements. Prior to the completion of our IPO, we had restrictive credit terms with existing freight vendors due to cash restrictions. These costs are expected to be significantly reduced in 2018.

Gross Profit. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $6,413,781 as compared to $7,412,077 for the year ended December 31, 2016 due to the sale of some products at lower margins to increase cash flow and increased freight costs in the amount of approximately $1.7 million.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $13,086,120 as compared to $7,689,898 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase resulted from the inclusion of a full year of Boxlight Group’s operating expenses included for the year ended December 31, 2017, along with $4 million of non-cash stock compensation expense.

Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense was $465,940 and $1,008,433 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Research and development expense primarily consists of costs associated with Mimio’s development of proprietary technology. The decrease was due to the company’s decision to decrease research and development expenditures in 2017. The R&D investments are cyclical and we had limited major enhancements to our software products or new hardware launches. A significant portion of our research and development is now paid for by several of our contract manufacturers.

Other income (expense), net. Other expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $158,830 as compared to $775,729 for the year ended December 31, 2016. During 2017, the Company settled debt and other liabilities with a net gain of $276,026. In 2016, the Company amended a note payable agreement that resulted in $350,000 of additional interest expense in August, which resulted in a significant increase in interest expense. Additionally, the Company issued additional notes to acquire Mimio and Boxlight Group during 2016 resulting in an increase in interest expense.

Net loss. Net loss was $7,297,109 and $2,061,983 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. There were some major contributing factors to the increase in net loss in 2017, including expense incurred in the amount of $4 million for non-cash stock compensation expense and approximately $1.7 million in additional freight expense.

To provide investors with additional insight and allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the information used by management in its financial and decision-making surrounding operations, we supplement our consolidated financial statements presented on a basis consistent with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, both non-GAAP financial measures of earnings.

EBITDA represents net income before income tax expense, interest income, interest expense, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA, plus stock compensation expense and non-recurring expenses. Our management uses EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as financial measures to evaluate the profitability and efficiency of our business model. We use these non-GAAP financial measures to assess the strength of the underlying operations of our business. These adjustments, and the non-GAAP financial measure that is derived from them, provide supplemental information to analyze our operations between periods and over time. We find this especially useful when reviewing results of operations, which include large non-cash amortizations of intangibles assets from acquisitions. Investors should consider our non-GAAP financial measures in addition to, and not as a substitute for, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

The following table contains reconciliations of net losses to EBITDA for the periods presented.

Reconciliation of net loss for the year ended

December 31, 2017 and 2016 to EBITDA

The following table contains reconciliations of net losses to adjusted EBITDA for the periods presented.

Reconciliation of net loss for the year ended

December 31, 2017 and 2016 to Adjusted EBITDA

Discussion of Effect of Seasonality on Financial Condition

Certain accounts on our balance sheets are subject to seasonal fluctuations. As our business and revenues grow, we expect these seasonal trends to be reduced. The bulk of our products are shipped to our educational customers prior to the beginning of the school year, usually in July, August or September. To prepare for the upcoming school year, we generally build up inventories during the second quarter of the year. Therefore, inventories tend to be at the highest levels at that point in time. In the first quarter of the year, inventories tend to decline significantly as products are delivered to customers and we do not need the same inventory levels during the first quarter. Accounts receivable balances tend to be at the highest levels in the third quarter, in which we record the highest level of sales.

We have been very proactive, and will continue to be proactive, in obtaining contracts during the fourth and first quarters that will help offset the seasonality of our business.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

In 2017, the Company struggled with liquidity issues due to credit limitations and the added expenses necessary to fund the initial public offering. The liquidity issues led to a significant increase in freight costs to enable us to meet shipping demands of our customers. We also sold product, in some instances, at lower margins in exchange for improved payment terms.

Our liquidity and capital resources were significantly improved through funding from our initial public offering in November 2017, along with our ability to close on a lending agreement in August 2017 that allows us to borrow using our accounts receivable as collateral.

The Company made great strides in 2017 improving our balance sheet through debt repayments and debt conversions. Our total short-term and long-term debt was decreased from $7,778,917 at December 31, 2016 to $856,449 at December 31, 2017.

As of December 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $2,010,325. We financed our operations and our capital expenditures during the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily through our initial public offering and a financing agreement entered into with a lender.

The Company’s initial public offering was completed on November 30, 2017. The Company raised the maximum amount offered of 1,000,000 shares and received net proceeds through the offering of $5,678,609.

On August 15, 2017, the Company entered into a $6,000,000 accounts receivable sale and purchase agreement with Sallyport Commercial Finance, LLC (“Sallyport”). Pursuant to the agreement, Sallyport agreed to purchase 85% of the eligible accounts receivable of the Company with the right of recourse.

In addition to our cash and banking arrangements, we had accounts receivable of $3,089,932 on December 31, 2017. Our accounts receivable and our ability to borrow agains accounts receivable provides an additional source of liquidity as cash payments are collected from customers in the normal course of business. Our accounts receivable balance fluctuates throughout the year based on the seasonality of the business. At December 31, 2017, we had additional borrowings available under the credit agreement of $1.5 million.

Our other cash requirements consist primarily of day-to-day operating expenses, capital expenditures and contractual obligations with respect to facility leases and other operating leases. We lease all of our office facilities. We expect to make future payments on existing leases from cash generated from operations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles accepted in the United States. In connection with the preparation of our financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and estimates about future events and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, we review the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.

Our significant accounting policies are discussed in notes of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain:

Emerging Growth Company

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. Certain specified reduced reporting and other regulatory requirements that are available to public companies that are emerging growth companies.

These provisions include:

We have elected to take advantage of the exemption from the adoption of new or revised financial accounting standards until they would apply to private companies. As a result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “smaller reporting company,” this item is not required.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

All financial information required by this Item is attached hereto at the end of this report beginning on page F-1 and is hereby incorporated by reference.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As required by Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted to the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, and that information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and financial officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report (“Evaluation Date”), pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to insufficient personnel resources within the accounting function to segregate the duties and insufficient written policies procedures over accounting transaction processing and period end financial disclosure, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and proper monitoring controls over accounting and financial reporting.

Notwithstanding the existence of the internal control deficiencies, management believes that the consolidated financial statements in this annual report on Form 10-K fairly present, in all material respects, the Company’s financial condition as of the Evaluation Date, and results of its operations and cash flows for the Evaluation Date, in conformity with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all controls systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving its objectives.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The internal controls for the Company are provided by executive management’s review and approval of all transactions. Our internal control over financial reporting also includes those policies and procedures that:

1. pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

2. provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our management; and

3. provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of these controls.

Based on this assessment, management has concluded that as of December 31, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, due to insufficient personnel resources within the accounting function to segregate the duties and insufficient written policies and procedures over accounting transaction processing and period end financial disclosure.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2017, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth information concerning our directors, executive officers and other key members of our management team as of March 29, 2018:

* Mr. Richards resigned for personal reasons on February 23, 2018.

Set forth below is biographical information about each of the individuals named in the tables above:

James Mark Elliott. Mr. Elliott has served as our Chief Executive Officer and a director since September 18, 2014. From 2012 to date, he has also served as the President of Genesis. From 2005 through 2012, he was the President of Promethean, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of whiteboards and interactive learning devices and led the team that grew Promethean in the Americas from $5 million in revenue to $250 million, with over 1,300,000 interactive whiteboards installed around the world. Throughout his career, Mr. Elliott has held senior executive roles, including president, senior vice president or director roles with Apple Computer, Lawson Software, E3 Corporation, PowerCerv Technologies, Tandem Computers, and Unisys/Burroughs. Mr. Elliott received a BBA in Economics from the University of North Georgia and a Master of Science degree in Industrial Management from Georgia Institute of Technology. Based on Mr. Elliott’s position as the chief executive officer of both the Company and Genesis, and his executive level experience in interactive learning devices and computer technology industries, our board of directors believes that Mr. Elliott has the appropriate set of skills to serve as a member of the board.

Henry (“Hank”) Nance Mr. Nance has been our Chief Operating Officer since September 18, 2014 and served as our President from September 18, 2014 until July 15, 2015. Mr. Nance began his career with the Boxlight Group in 1999 and has served as the Boxlight Group’s President since 2009. At the Boxlight Group, he developed the company’s first business-to-consumer division, generating over $12 million in sales within the first 24 months of inception. Shortly thereafter he took over product development, corporate relations, and negotiations for business-to-consumer and business-to-business products. Prior to Mr. Nance’s tenure at the Boxlight Group, he managed commercial and residential construction working in the San Juan Islands, Washington State and Northern California.

Takesha Brown. Ms. Brown was appointed by our Board on March 15, 2018 as our Chief Financial Officer. Since April 2017, Ms. Brown has served as the Company’s Controller. Prior to that, from 2010 through 2017, Ms. Brown first served in the role as Controller and then as Financial Reporting Manager at General Electric in Atlanta, Georgia. Ms. Brown started her career in public accounting, first with PricewaterhouseCoopers, then moving to Ernst & Young and staying there until 2010. At the time of her departure from Ernst & Young, Ms. Brown was an Audit Senior Manager. Ms. Brown is a licensed CPA with a Bachelor of Science in Commerce and Business Administration and a Masters of Accounting from The University of Alabama.

Michael Pope. Mr. Pope has served as our President since July 15, 2015 and has been a director of our Company since September 18, 2014. Mr. Pope served as Managing Director of Vert Capital Corp., a Los Angeles based merchant bank, and its affiliates from October 2011 to October 2016, managing portfolio holdings in education, consumer products and digital media. Prior to joining Vert Capital, from May 2008 to October 2011, Mr. Pope was Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer for the Taylor Family, managing family investment holdings in consumer products, professional services, real estate and education. Mr. Pope also held positions including senior SEC reporting at Omniture and Assurance Associate at Grant Thornton. Mr. Pope holds an active CPA license and serves on the boards of various organizations. Mr. Pope earned his undergraduate and graduate degrees in accounting from Brigham Young University with academic honors.

Tiffany Kuo. Ms. Kuo has been a director of our Company since September 18, 2014. Ms. Kuo has been a General Management Consultant in Strategy and Operations for Deloitte Consulting, LLP in Houston, TX since August 2011. Ms. Kuo graduated from Rice University with a Bachelor of Science and Masters of Science in Electrical Engineering in 2011 and is currently in the Sloan Masters of Business Administration Program at The Massachusetts Institute of Technology. We believe that Ms. Kuo should serve as a member of our board of directors due to her experience in business strategy and operations at Deloitte Consulting, LLP.

Rudolph F. Crew. Dr. Crew has been a director of our Company since April 1, 2015. Since August 2013, Dr. Crew has served as the president of Medgar Evers College. From July 2012 to July 2013, he was the chief education officer at Oregon Education Investment Board, overseeing the PK-16 system. From September 2011 to July 2012, Dr. Crew served as the president of K12 Division at Revolution Prep, a company that offers preparation courses for the SAT and ACT standardized achievement tests. Prior to that, from January 2009 to July 2013, he was a professor at USC Rossier School of Education, teaching graduate school courses. From January 2009 to September 2011, Dr. Crew also served as the president of Global Partnership Schools, an organization offers planning support services and collaborative programs to public schools and school districts. Dr. Crew received his bachelor’s degree in management from Babson College in 1972. He earned his master’s degree in urban education in 1973 and his degree of doctor of education in educational administration in 1978, both from University of Massachusetts. We believe that Dr. Crew’s in-depth knowledge and extensive experience in education field make him a valuable member of our board of directors.

Steve Hix. Mr. Hix has been a director of our company since June 30, 2017. He is a business executive and founder of numerous public and private companies spanning his 40-year business career. Since 2012, Mr. Hix has served as the President of Circle Technology, a wireless presentation company. Previously, he was the Founder & CEO of InFocus Systems from 1987-1993 (projector company) which grew to nearly $1 billion in sales and had a market value of more than $2 billion as a public company. He was also the Founder, CEO & President of Phix Focus (R&D in Display Technology and Touch Screen Technology) 2005-2012, CEO of i3 Identification International (finger printing technology company) 2005-2010, Founder of Advan Media (Advertising Trucks with Digital Display Screens) 2003-2005, Founder & CEO of SARIF (High Temperature Poly-silicon LCD) 1993-2002, founder of Motif, Inc. (High Speed LCD Technology) 1990-1993, and co-Founder of Planar Systems (Electroluminescence Technology) 1983-1987. Mr. Hix has nearly a dozen patents in the display technology and wireless transmission space and continues to be a pioneer in the industry. He began his career serving the US Navy as Naval Intelligence and sits on the board of several companies including Melexis, Community Foundation of Southwest Washington and Puget Sound Blood Center.

Dale Strang. Mr. Strang has been a director of our company since August 10, 2017. He has served as a Senior Vice President of Media Strategy & Operations at Healthline Networks since 2015. Mr. Strang was President and Chief Excutive officer of SpinMedia from 2013 to 2015. Mr. Strang was the Chief Executive Officer and President at Viximo from 2010 to 2012. Mr. Strang has over 25 years of media experience with successful businesses including IDG, Ziff-Davis and IGN/Fox Interactive. Mr. Strang has more than 18 years of experience in consumer technology and video game publishing, including 14 years at the senior management level. He served as Executive Vice President and General Manager, Media Division, of IGN Entertainment. In this position, he oversaw advertising sales, marketing and the production of editorial content for all IGN entertainment media properties.

Harold Bevis. Mr. Bevis has served as a Director since March 2018. He has 25 years of business leadership experience, including 15 years as a Chief Executive Officer. He was a business leader at both GE and Emerson Electric. He has led or directed 8 businesses in 6 industries, 148 plants in 22 countries, 12 new business/new plant startups, 11 acquisitions, 24 business/plant expansions, and over 10,000 employees. Mr. Bevis is currently President of OmniMax International, a portfolio of building products businesses, since October 2017. Mr. Bevis earned a BS degree in industrial engineering from Iowa State University and an MBA degree from Columbia Business School. He is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors and has served on 5 Boards of Directors. Since June 2014, he has served at Commercial Vehicle Group, a NASDAQ listed company, where he serves as a member of the audit and compensation committees.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

No executive officer or director is a party in a legal proceeding adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries. No executive officer or director has been involved in the last ten years in any of the following:

Board of Directors

All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Directors are elected at the annual meetings to serve for one-year terms. Officers are elected by, and serve at the discretion of, the board of directors. Our board of directors shall hold meetings on at least a quarterly basis.

Director Independence

As of the date of this Annual Report, Dr. Rudy Crew, Steve Hix and Dale Strang are our current independent directors. As a Nasdaq listed company, we believe that the foregoing directors satisfy the definition of “Independent Director” under Nasdaq Rule 5605(a)(2). In making this determination, our board of directors considered the relationships that each of these non-employee directors has with us and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence. As required under applicable NASDAQ rules, we anticipate that our independent directors will meet on a regular basis as often as necessary to fulfill their responsibilities, including at least annually in executive session without the presence of non-independent directors and management.

On February 23, 2018, Mr. Robin D. Richards resigned from the Board of Directors for personal reasons and not as a result of any disagreements between Mr. Richards and the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices. On March 15, 2018 the Board elected Harold Bevis to join the Board of Directors. Mr. Bevis accepted the position on March 29, 2018.

Board Committees

Our board of directors has established standing committees in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities. These committees include an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our board of directors has adopted written charters for each of these committees. Copies of the charters are available on our website at www.boxlightcorp.com. Our board of directors may establish other committees as it deems necessary or appropriate from time to time.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Mr. Elliott holds the positions of chief executive officer and chairman of the board of the Company. The board believes that Mr. Elliott’s services as both chief executive officer and chairman of the board is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. Mr. Elliott possesses detailed and in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges facing us in our business and is thus best positioned to develop agendas that ensure that the Board’s time and attention are focused on the most critical matters relating to the business. His combined role enables decisive leadership, ensures clear accountability, and enhances the Company’s ability to communicate its message and strategy clearly and consistently to our shareholders, employees and customers.

The Board has not designated a lead director. The independent directors can call and plan their executive sessions collaboratively and, between meetings of the Board, communicate with management and one another directly. Under these circumstances, the directors believe designating a lead director to take on responsibility for functions in which they all currently participate might detract from rather than enhance performance of their responsibilities as directors.

Corporate Governance

Audit Committee

According to its charter, the Audit Committee consists of at least three members, each of whom shall be a non-employee director who has been determined by the Board to meet the independence requirements of NASDAQ, and also Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the SEC, subject to the exemptions provided in Rule 10A-3(c). A copy of our Audit Committee Charter is located under the “Corporate Governance” tab on our website at www.boxlight.com. The Audit Committee members shall consist of Mr. Hix, serving as our Audit Chair, Mr. Strang and Dr. Crew. All members of the Audit Committee are independent directors. The Audit Committee will assist the Board by overseeing the performance of the independent auditors and the quality and integrity of our internal accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. The Audit Committee is responsible for retaining (subject to stockholder ratification) and, as necessary, terminating the engagement of, the independent auditors, annually reviews the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditors and the audit plan, fees and audit results, and pre-approves audit and non-audit services to be performed by the auditors and related fees. Our board has determined that we have at least one “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the rules and regulations of the SEC and that is Mr. Hix.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee members are Mr. Strang, Dr. Crew and Mr. Bevis. The Compensation Committee shall make recommendations to the Board concerning salaries and incentive compensation for our officers, including our principal executive officer, and employees and administers our stock option plans. A copy of our Compensation Committee Charter is located under the “Corporate Governance” tab on our website at www.boxlight.com.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee members are Dr. Crew, Mr. Hix, Mr. Bevis Steve Hix and Mr. Strang. All members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are independent directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee assists the Board in identifying qualified individuals to become board members, in determining the composition of the Board and in monitoring the process to assess Board effectiveness. A copy of our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter is located under the “Corporate Governance” tab on our website at www.boxlight.com.

Material Changes to the Procedures by which Security Holders May Recommend Nominees to the Board

We do not currently have a procedure by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Board. Prior to the listing of our common stock on NASDAQ, as a private company with a limited shareholder base, we did not believe that it was important to provide such a procedure. However, in connection with our listing on NASDAQ and the requirement to hold annual shareholder meetings, we will consider implementing such a policy in the future.

Director Qualifications

The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the Company’s business consistent with their fiduciary duty to the stockholders. This significant responsibility requires highly-skilled individuals with various qualities, attributes and professional experience. There are general requirements for service on the Board that are applicable to directors and there are other skills and experience that should be represented on the Board as a whole but not necessarily by each director. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers the qualifications of director candidates individually and in the broader context of the Board’s overall composition and the Company’s current and future needs.

In its assessment of each potential candidate, including those recommended by the stockholders, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider the nominee’s judgment, integrity, experience, independence, understanding of the Company’s business or other related industries and such other factors it determines are pertinent in light of the current needs of the Board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also takes into account the ability of a director to devote the time and effort necessary to fulfill his or her responsibilities to the Company. evaluate the business experience, specialized skills and experience of director candidates. Diversity of background including diversity of race, ethnicity, international background, gender and age, may be considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee when evaluating candidates for Board membership.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of the code will be made available on the Corporate Governance section of our website, which is located at www.boxlight.com. If we make any substantive amendments to, or grant any waivers from, the code of business conduct and ethics for any officer or director, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website or in a current report on Form 8-K.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports regarding ownership of, and transactions in, our securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to provide us with copies of those filings. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms furnished to us and written representations by our officers and directors regarding their compliance with applicable reporting requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements for our executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders were met during the year ended December 31, 2017; except for the following:

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth information regarding the total compensation received by, or earned by, our Chief Executive Officer, our President and Chief Operating Officer and our Chief Financial Officer (collectively, the “named executive officers”) during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Employment Agreements

We entered into employment agreements with Mr. Elliott, Mr. Nance, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Pope and Ms. Brown, the terms of which are set forth below.

James Mark Elliott

The Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Elliott dated as of November 30, 2017, pursuant to which Mr. Elliott shall receive a base salary of $195,000 per year and shall, upon evaluation of his performance and at the discretion of the Company’s board of directors, be awarded a cash bonus in the amount of $25,000 on a quarterly basis commencing on the quarter ending December 31, 2017. In addition to (and not in lieu of) the base salary, the Company shall grant Mr. Elliott employee stock options to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock (vesting in equal monthly installments over a one-year period, commencing on January 31, 2018), pursuant to the Corporation’s 2014 Stock Incentive Plan.

Mr. Elliott’s agreement contains confidentiality and non-competition and non-solicitation covenants that continue during and for two years following the expiration or termination of his employment agreement; provided, that such restrictive covenants expire immediately if Mr. Elliott terminates his employment agreement for “good reasons” or, in nine months if we elect to terminate his employment prior to the expiration of the term of the agreement without “cause”.

Henry “Hank” Nance

The Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Nance, dated as of November 30, 2017, pursuant to which Mr. Nance shall receive a base salary of $195,000 per year and shall, upon evaluation of his performance and at the discretion of the Company’s chief executive officer, be awarded a cash bonus in the amount of $25,000 on a quarterly basis commencing on the quarter ending December 31, 2017. In addition to (and not in lieu of) the base salary, the Company shall grant Mr. Nance employee stock options to purchase up to 200,000 shares of common stock (vesting in equal monthly installments over a one-year period, commencing on January 31, 2018), pursuant to the Corporation’s 2014 Stock Incentive Plan.

Mr. Nance’s agreement contains confidentiality and non-competition and non-solicitation covenants that continue during and for two years following the expiration of his employment agreement; provided that such restrictive covenants expire immediately if we breach his employment agreement or, in nine months, if we elect to terminate his employment prior to the expiration of the term of the agreement for reasons other than cause (as defined in the employment agreement).

Sheri Lofgren

The Company entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Lofgren dated as of November 30, 2017, pursuant to which Ms. Lofgren shall receive a base salary of $195,000 per year and shall, upon evaluation of her performance and at the discretion of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, be awarded a cash bonus in the amount of $25,000 on a quarterly basis commencing on the quarter ending December 31, 2017. In addition to (and not in lieu of) the base salary, the Company shall grant Ms. Lofgren employee stock options to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock (vesting in equal monthly installments over a one-year period, commencing on January 31, 2018), pursuant to the Corporation’s 2014 Stock Incentive Plan.

Ms. Lofgren’s agreement contains confidentiality and non-competition and non-solicitation covenants that continue during and for two years following the expiration of her employment agreement; provided, that such restrictive covenants expire immediately if we breach her employment agreement or, in nine months, if we elect to terminate her employment prior to the expiration of the term of the agreement for reasons other than for cause (as defined in the employment agreement).

On March 15, 2018, Sheri Lofgren, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company tendered her resignation. Ms. Lofgren’s resignation was for personal reasons and not as the result of disagreements between Ms. Lofgren and the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices.

Michael Pope

The Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Pope dated as of November 30, 2017, pursuant to which Mr. Pope shall receive a base salary of $195,000 per year and shall, upon evaluation of his performance and at the discretion of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, be awarded a cash bonus in the amount of $25,000 on a quarterly basis commencing on the quarter ending December 31, 2017. In addition to (and not in lieu of) the base salary, the Company shall grant Mr. Pope employee stock options to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock (vesting in equal monthly installments over a one-year period, commencing on January 31, 2018), pursuant to the Corporation’s 2014 Stock Incentive Plan.

Mr. Pope’s agreement contains confidentiality and non-competition and non-solicitation covenants that continue during and for two years following the expiration of his employment agreement; provided, that such restrictive covenants expire immediately if we breach his employment agreement or, in nine months, if we elect to terminate his employment prior to the expiration of the term of the agreement for reasons other than for cause (as defined in the employment agreement).

Takesha Brown

The Company entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Brown, dated as of March 19, 2018, pursuant to which Ms. Brown shall receive a base salary of $165,000 per year and shall, upon evaluation of her performance and at the discretion of the Company’s chief executive officer, be awarded a cash bonus in the amount of $12,500 on a quarterly basis commencing on the quarter ending June 30, 2018. In addition to (and not in lieu of) the base salary, the Company shall grant Ms. Brown employee stock options to purchase up to 35,000 shares of common stock (vesting in equal monthly installments over a one-year period, commencing on March 19, 2018), pursuant to the Corporation’s 2014 Stock Incentive Plan.

Ms. Brown’s agreement contains confidentiality and non-competition and non-solicitation covenants that continue during and for two years following the expiration of her employment agreement; provided, that such restrictive covenants expire immediately if we breach her employment agreement or, in nine months, if we elect to terminate her employment prior to the expiration of the term of the agreement for reasons other than for cause (as defined in the employment agreement).

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2017

The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2017. All share amounts and exercise prices in the following table reflects stock splits after grant date.

Director Compensation

We reimburse all members of our board of directors for their direct out of pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of our board. This table summarizes the compensation paid to each of our independent directors who served in such capacity during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

Director Compensation Arrangements

Rudolph F. Crew

Dr. Crew receives an annual fee of $50,000, payable monthly, which commenced on March 26, 2016. In addition, in connection with the listing on NASDAQ, Dr. Crew was entitled to a one-time purchase, at par value, of 53,000 shares of our Class A common stock.

Dr. Crew will not be permitted to sell any of his shares for the six months immediately following the consummation of this public offering and thereafter, not more than 50% of his shares between the seventh month and 12th month after the consummation of this public offering, and not more than 50% of the remaining shares between the 12th month and 18th months after the consummation of this public offering.

Steve Hix

Mr. Hix receives an annual fee of $10,000 for serving as the Chair of our Audit Committee. The fee is payable quarterly, with the first payment to be made on September 30, 2017. On November 30, 2017, Mr. Hix was granted stock options to purchase 50,000 shares of our Class A common stock exercisable at $7.00 per share with vesting over one year.

Dale Strang

On November 30, 2017, Mr. Strang was granted stock options to purchase 50,000 shares of our Class A common stock exercisable at $7.00 per share with vesting over one year.

Robin D. Richards

On November 30, 2017, Mr. Richards purchased, at the par value, 133,000 shares of our common stock, representing 1.25% of the number of fully diluted shares of common stock after giving effect to the acquisitions of the Boxlight Group and Genesis.

Mr. Richards is not permitted to sell any of his shares until May 30, 2018, which is six months following the consummation of our public offering and thereafter, not more than 50% of his shares between the seventh month and 12th month after the consummation of our public offering, and not more than 50% of the remaining shares between the 12th month and 18th months after the consummation of our public offering.

On February 23, 2018, Mr. Robin D. Richards resigned from the Board of Directors for personal reasons and not as a result of any disagreements between Mr. Richards and the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth, as of March 28, 2018, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock, by each beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s Class A common stock, each director and each named executive officer and all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, except as qualified by the information set forth in the notes to this table. As of December 31, 2017, 9,558,997 shares of our Class A common stock were issued and outstanding.

Unless otherwise noted, the address for each director and executive officer is c/o Boxlight Corporation, 1045 Progress Circle, Lawrenceville, Georgia 30043.

(1) Represents 100% of 331,841 shares subject to a stock option granted to Mr. Elliott which have vested as of December 31, 2016. Upon completion of our initial public offering, Mr. Elliott will receive an additional 92,510 shares of our Class A common stock representing 25% of the shares to be issued to the former members of Genesis upon automatic conversion of BOXL’s Series B convertible preferred stock. In addition, Mr. Elliott converted accounts payable due from Genesis into 73,267 shares of common stock.

(2) Upon completion of our initial public offering, Mr. Nance will receive 85,714 shares of our Class A common stock representing his pro-rata portion of the 2,055,873 shares to be issued to the former stockholders of Boxlight upon automatic conversion of BOXL’s Series C convertible preferred stock. In addition, stock options to purchase 144,020 shares were granted to Mr. Nance under our 2014 Stock Incentive Plan. These options commenced vesting on December 31, 2017.

(3) Represents 100% of 320,602 shares subject to a stock option grant to Ms. Lofgren which have vested as of March 31, 2017.

(4) Consists of 199,203 shares issuable upon exercise of a warrant issued to an entity associated with Mr. Pope in October 2016. Does not include 82,534 shares, Mr. Pope’s portion of 330,135 shares held by Mim Holdings, LLC, or 577,450 shares held by Sugar House Trust. Mim Holdings is a limited liability company owned by the Marlborough Brothers Family Trust, a trust established for the benefit of members of the families of Michael Pope and Adam Levin. Sugar House Trust is a trust established for the benefit of the family of Michael Pope. Mr. Pope does not have voting or dispositive power and authority of the shares beneficially owned by Mim Holdings or Sugar House Trust and disclaims any voting or dispositive power with respect to those shares.

(5) Represents 1,903,586 shares of Class A common stock that were issued upon the automatic conversion of our Series C preferred stock issued to Everest Display, Inc., or its wholly owned subsidiary, in connection with our July 2016 acquisition of the Boxlight Group. In June, 2017, Everest Display, Inc. agreed to convert $1,500,000 of accounts payable into 238,095 shares of Class A common stock at a conversion price of $6.30 per share. In August, 2017, Everest Display, Inc. converted a long-term convertible note payable and accrued interest into 327,027 shares of common stock at $6.30 per share. K Laser is the majority stockholder of Everest Display, Inc.. Mr. Alex Kuo is the majority stockholder of K Laser and holds the power to vote and dispose of our shares issued and issuable to EDI. Such 1,903,586 shares do not include (a) 178,572 shares of Class A common stock that K Laser purchased at $5.60 per share in the September 2016 private placement, and (b) an additional 142,857 shares of Class A common stock that Alex Kuo, K Laser or other affiliates or business associates of Mr. Kuo may elect to purchase at a price of $7.00 per share in our initial public offering.

(6) Includes 53,000 shares of common stock that Dr. Crew purchased at par value on November 30, 2017.

(7) Includes 133,000 shares of common stock that Mr. Richards purchased at par value on November 30, 2017.

(8) Mr. Lane, 26716 Via Colina, Stevanson Ranch, CA 91381 is trustee of Sugar House Trust, established for the benefit of the family of Michael Pope, our President and a Director. Mr. Lane has sole investment and voting power with respect to the shares.

(9) Mr. Edwin Hur, 11441 Beach St., Cerritos, CA 90703 is trustee of AEL Irrevocable Trust, established for the benefit of the family of Adam Levin. Mr. Hur has sole investment and voting power with respect to the shares.

(10) Consists of 597,610 shares issuable upon exercise of a warrant issued to Dynamic Capital, LLC in October, 2016. Dynamic Capital is owned by the AEL Irrevocable Trust.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

On September 30, 2014, the Company entered into a line of credit agreement with Vert Capital. The line of credit allowed the Company to borrow up to $500,000 for public offering expenses. On March 31, 2016, we amended the line of credit to increase it to $900,000. The funds accrued interest at 10% per annum. The interest rate decreased to 5.75% pursuant to the amendment to purchase agreement with EDI entered in September 2016. Interest on any advanced funds was accrued monthly and all outstanding principal and accrued interest was due in full from the proceeds of our initial public offering. On December 1, 2017, the outstanding principal and accrued interest in the amount of $775,259 was paid in full.

On July 15, 2015, the Company entered into a management agreement with VC2 Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, in which Michael Pope, our President and Director, was a manager. VC2 Advisors is owned by Sugar House Trust and AEL Irrevocable Trust, trusts established for the benefit of the families of Michael Pope and Adam Levin. Pursuant to the agreement, VC2 shall perform consulting services for the Company relating to, among other things, sourcing and analyzing strategic acquisitions and introductions to various financing sources. VC2 shall receive an annual management fee payable in cash equal to 1.5% of total consolidated revenues at the end of each fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, payable in monthly installments, commencing as of the date of the Company’s IPO. The annual fee is subject to a cap of $1,000,000 in each of 2016, 2017 and 2018. At its option, VC2 may also defer payment until the end of each year, payable as an option to purchase shares of Class A common stock of the Company, at a price per share equal to 100% of the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock as traded on Nasdaq or any other national securities exchange as of December 31 of such year in question. Effective October 12, 2016, as a result of Adam Levin and Michael Pope no longer being employed at VC2, the consulting agreement with VC2 was terminated. Subsequently, the Company entered into new consulting agreements on identical terms with other entities which now employ Michael Pope and Adam Levin. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had a payable of $35,632 pursuant to these agreements.

In 2018, as a result of Adam Levin and Michael Pope no longer working at VC2 Advisors, the Company canceled the VC2 Advisors agreement and entered into a new management agreement, with substantially the same terms, with Canaan Parish, LLC, an entity affiliated with Michael Pope.

On July 18, 2016, Boxlight Holdings, Inc., a newly formed Delaware subsidiary of Boxlight Parent, consummated the acquisition of the Boxlight Group under a share purchase agreement, dated May 10, 2016, with Everest Display, Inc., a Taiwan corporation (“EDI”) and its subsidiary, Guang Feng International Ltd. (“Guang Feng”) subsidiary, the former shareholder of the Boxlight Group. K Laser Technology, Ltd., a Taiwan corporation (“K Laser”) is the majority shareholder of EDI and one of our major shareholders. Under the terms of the share purchase agreement, we issued EDI 270,000 shares of our Series C Preferred Stock, that has a stated or liquidation value of $20.00 per share. Upon completion of our initial public offering on November 30, 2017, the Series C Preferred Stock automatically converted into shares of our Class A common stock. Such newly converted shares of Class A common stock, (including certain bonus shares of Class A common stock represented 8% of the shares issuable upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock) to be issued to EDI or its subsidiaries, and totaled 2,055,872 shares of our Class A common stock, representing approximately 22.22% of our fully-diluted common stock as defined in the purchase agreement. Hank Nance, our Chief Operating Officer and the President of the Boxlight Group, will received 85,714 of these shares.

Under the terms of the EDI share purchase agreement, as amended on September 28, 2016, the parties agreed that the Boxlight Group and Boxlight Parent will settle and pay approximately $5.75 million of accrued accounts payable currently owed to EDI, in the manner set forth below.

On May 5, 2016, pursuant to a membership interest purchase agreement, dated as of April 1, 2016, Boxlight Parent acquired 100% of the membership interest in Mimio, from Mim Holdings, LLC., a Delaware limited liability company wholly-owned by the Marlborough Brothers Trust, a trust established for the benefit of members of the families of Adam Levin and Michael Pope, our President and Director, in exchange for a 4% $2,000,000 unsecured convertible promissory note due March 31, 2019, and the assumption of a 6% $3,425,000 senior secured note of Mim Holdings that was due July 3, 2016 and was payable to Skyview Capital, LLC, (“Skyview”), the former equity owner of Mimio (the “Skyview Note”). For purposes of the purchase agreement, the sale to Boxlight Parent, was deemed to have been consummated as of April 1, 2016.

The Skyview Note was issued by Mim Holdings to Skyview on November 4, 2015 as payment for the acquisition of 100% of the membership equity of Mimio. Skyview Note was guaranteed and secured by a lien and security interest on all of the assets of Mimio. Prior to the sale of Mimio to Boxlight Parent, VC2 Partners LLC (the former owner of Mim Holdings) assigned its equity in Mim Holdings to the Marlborough Brothers Family Trust (the “Marlborough Trust”). Adam Levin and Michael Pope, our President and Director, and members of their families, are beneficiaries of the Marlborough Trust and other trusts who are principal stockholders of Boxlight Parent. See “Principal Stockholders”.

In connection with the acquisition of Mimio by Boxlight Parent, in May 2016 we issued a $2,000,000 note payable to Mim Holdings, Inc., the former stockholder of Mimio. In June, 2017 this convertible promissory note was converted into 330,135 shares of our Class A common stock at $6.30 per share.

Mim Holdings is wholly-owned by the Marlborough Brothers Family Trust, a trust established for the benefit of members of the families of Adam Levin and Michael Pope. Mr. Pope is the President and a member of our board of directors.

On September 28, 2016, we sold to K Laser, the principal stockholder of EDI, an aggregate of 178,572 shares of our Class A common stock at a purchase price of $5.60 per share and received net proceeds of $1,000,003. The per share sales price is intended to be 80% of the initial price per share of Class A common stock offered to the public. Accordingly, the 178,572 shares of Class A common stock are subject to increase in the event that the initial offering price of the shares offered is less than $7.00. The private placement was conducted through the efforts of our management and with the assistance of K Laser and its affiliates. No commissions or other compensation was paid in connection with such private placement. The $1,000,003 of net proceeds of such private placement was used together with advances from Crestmark under the above line of credit to retire outstanding indebtedness to Hitachi and pay the $2,500,000 installment due under Skyview Note.

In October 2016, the Company issued 73,266 shares to Mark Elliott, the Company’s CEO, at $1.055 per share to settle accounts payable of $77,268.

On November 30, 2017, in connection with the listing on NASDAQ, Dr. Crew purchased, at the par value, 53,000 shares of our Class A common stock representing 0.5% of the number of fully diluted shares of Class A common stock after giving effect to the acquisitions of the Boxlight Group and Genesis and our initial public offering. If we file a registration statement registering for resale shares held by its officers or directors, Dr. Crew may request that we include his shares in such registration statement. Dr. Crew will not be permitted to sell any of his shares until May 30, 2018 (six months following the consummation of our public offering) and thereafter, not more than 50% of his shares between the seventh month and 12th month after the consummation our public offering, and not more than 50% of the remaining shares between the 12th month and 18th months after the consummation of our public offering.

On November 30, 2017, in connection with the listing on NASDAQ, Mr. Richards purchased, at the par value, 133,000 shares of our Class A common stock representing 1.25% of the number of fully diluted shares of Class A common stock after giving effect to the acquisitions of the Boxlight Group and Genesis and our initial public offering. 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table represents fees for professional audit services for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, rendered by GBH, CPA’s.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies

The Audit Committee shall pre-approve any non-audit services proposed to be provided to the Company by the independent auditors.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Lawrenceville, of the State of Georgia, on this 2^nd day of April, 2018.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Index to Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the stockholders and the board of directors of
Boxlight Corporation

Lawrenceville, Georgia

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Boxlight Corporation (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Other matters

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net cash used in operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ GBH CPAs, PC

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

GBH CPAs, PC
www.gbhcpas.com
Houston, Texas
April 2, 2018

Boxlight Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016