Brownie's Marine Group, Inc - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(mark one)
þ Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
o Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______.
Commission File No. 000-28321
Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc.
(Name of Small Business Issuer in Its Charter)
Nevada
|
90-0226181
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
940 N.W. 1st Street, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
|
33311
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
(954) 462-5570
(Issuer’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Former Name, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Corporate Website, in any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company x
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
There were 28,283,533 shares of common stock outstanding as of August 9, 2011.
PART I
Item 1. Financial Statements
Financial Information
BROWNIE'S MARINE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current assets
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 128,515 | $ | 4,171 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of $28,000 and $15,000 allowance for doubtful accounts, respectively
|
61,329 | 29,553 | ||||||
Accounts receivable - related parties
|
56,894 | 23,998 | ||||||
Inventory
|
496,610 | 525,595 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
177,480 | 36,484 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset, net - current
|
512 | 469 | ||||||
Total current assets
|
921,340 | 620,270 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
1,122,434 | 1,139,911 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset, net - non-current
|
111,209 | 108,309 | ||||||
Other assets
|
2,895 | 2,895 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 2,157,878 | $ | 1,871,385 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||
Current liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$ | 566,856 | $ | 510,641 | ||||
Customer deposits
|
49,705 | 58,390 | ||||||
Royalties payable - related parties
|
105,429 | 87,048 | ||||||
Other liabilities
|
2,928 | 13,346 | ||||||
Other liabilities and accrued interest - related parties
|
32,501 | 31,752 | ||||||
Convertible debentures, net
|
253,442 | 90,676 | ||||||
Notes payable - current portion
|
1,084,586 | — | ||||||
Notes payable - related parties - current portion
|
204,986 | 205,180 | ||||||
Total current liabilities
|
2,300,433 | 997,033 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities
|
||||||||
Notes payable - long-term portion
|
3,221 | 1,053,993 | ||||||
Notes payable - related parties - long-term portion
|
81,708 | 124,014 | ||||||
Total liabilities
|
2,385,362 | 2,175,040 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders' deficit
|
||||||||
Preferred stock; $0.001 par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized; 425,000 issued and outstanding
|
43 | — | ||||||
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 28,398,706 and 4,051,502 share issued, respectively; 27,733,189 and 4,051,502 shares outstanding, respectively
|
27,733 | 4,052 | ||||||
Common stock payable; $0.001 par value; 256,294 and 543,240 shares, respectively
|
256 | 543 | ||||||
Prepaid equity based compensation
|
(887,500 | ) | (41,586 | ) | ||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
5,864,834 | 2,233,119 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(5,232,850 | ) | (2,499,783 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' deficit
|
(227,484 | ) | (303,655 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
$ | 2,157,878 | $ | 1,871,385 |
See Accompanying Unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1
BROWNIE'S MARINE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
$ | 436,151 | $ | 445,295 | $ | 645,657 | $ | 764,211 | ||||||||
Net revenues - related parties
|
161,043 | 212,770 | 314,437 | 358,037 | ||||||||||||
Total net revenues
|
597,194 | 658,065 | 960,094 | 1,122,248 | ||||||||||||
Cost of net revenues
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost of net revenues
|
383,298 | 474,659 | 713,759 | 853,546 | ||||||||||||
Royalties expense - related parties
|
14,728 | 18,122 | 23,849 | 30,962 | ||||||||||||
Total cost of net revenues
|
398,026 | 492,781 | 737,608 | 884,508 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
199,168 | 165,284 | 222,486 | 237,740 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
|
391,963 | 351,645 | 601,013 | 609,808 | ||||||||||||
Research and development costs
|
16,326 | 17,086 | 36,906 | 32,646 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
408,289 | 368,731 | 637,919 | 642,454 | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations
|
(209,121 | ) | (203,447 | ) | (415,433 | ) | (404,714 | ) | ||||||||
Other expense, net
|
||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense, net
|
(3,379 | ) | (6,031 | ) | (6,507 | ) | (4,898 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense
|
150,944 | 18,826 | 237,274 | 39,168 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense - related parties
|
2,085,996 | 102,771 | 2,089,810 | 16,526 | ||||||||||||
Total other expense, net
|
2,233,561 | 115,566 | 2,320,577 | 50,796 | ||||||||||||
Net loss before provision for income taxes
|
(2,442,682 | ) | (319,013 | ) | (2,736,010 | ) | (455,510 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for income tax expense (benefit )
|
16,981 | (27,273 | ) | (2,943 | ) | (95,616 | ) | |||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (2,459,663 | ) | $ | (291,740 | ) | $ | (2,733,067 | ) | $ | (359,894 | ) | ||||
Basic loss per common share
|
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | ||||
Diluted loss per common share
|
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | ||||
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
|
13,010,738 | 2,421,294 | 12,969,277 | 2,119,288 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
13,010,738 | 2,421,294 | 12,960,277 | 2,119,288 |
See Accompanying Unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
BROWNIE'S MARINE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Common
stock
|
Common stock
payable
|
Preferred
|
Prepaid equity based
|
Additional paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Total stockholders'
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Stock
|
Amount
|
compensation
|
capital
|
deficit
|
deficit
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
4,051,502 | $ | 4,052 | 543,240 | $ | 543 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (41,586 | ) | $ | 2,233,119 | $ | (2,499,783 | ) | $ | (303,655 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock payable from prior reporting periods
|
337,290 | 337 | (337,290 | ) | (337 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discounts on convertible debentures
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 168,500 | — | 168,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock granted for consulting and legal services
|
41,772 | 42 | 17,333 | 17 | — | — | — | 9,831 | — | 9,890 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current period amortization of prepaid equity based compensation
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 22,250 | — | — | 22,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (273,404 | ) | (273,404 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
4,430,564 | 4,431 | 223,283 | 223 | — | — | (19,336 | ) | 2,411,450 | (2,773,187 | ) | (376,419 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock payable from prior reporting periods
|
17,333 | 17 | (17,333 | ) | (17 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discounts on convertible debentures
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 300,000 | — | 300,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock granted for consulting and legal services
|
81,958 | 82 | 50,344 | 50 | — | — | — | 10,230 | — | 10,362 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued for prepaid inventory
|
253,334 | 253 | — | — | — | — | — | 37,747 | — | 38,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of preferred stock for debt forgiveness
|
— | — | — | — | 42,500 | 43 | — | 2,124,957 | — | 2,125,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repayment of short term loan in stock
|
50,000 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | 450 | — | 500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock in consideration of personal guarantees
|
20,000,000 | 20,000 | — | — | — | — | (1,000,000 | ) | 980,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible debentures converted to stock
|
2,900,000 | 2,900 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current period amortization of prepaid equity based compensation
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 131,836 | — | — | 131,836 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (2,459,663 | ) | (2,459,663 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)
|
27,733,189 | $ | 27,733 | 256,294 | $ | 256 | 42,500 | $ | 43 | $ | (887,500 | ) | $ | 5,864,834 | $ | (5,232,850 | ) | $ | (227,484 | ) |
See Accompanying Unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
BROWNIE'S MARINE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (2,733,067 | ) | $ | (359,894 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
17,477 | 17,190 | ||||||
Change in deferred tax asset, net
|
(2,943 | ) | (95,616 | ) | ||||
Equity based compensation for consulting and legal services
|
20,252 | 14,187 | ||||||
Accretion of convertible debt discounts
|
165,666 | — | ||||||
Forgiveness of debt interest expense - related party
|
2,082,500 | — | ||||||
Amortization of prepaid equity based compensation expense
|
154,086 | 127,527 | ||||||
Gain on sale of fixed asset
|
(5,000 | ) | — | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Change in accounts receivable, net
|
(31,776 | ) | (41,300 | ) | ||||
Change in accounts receivable - related parties
|
(32,896 | ) | (39,420 | ) | ||||
Change in inventory
|
28,985 | 6,633 | ||||||
Change in prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
(26,996 | ) | 35,422 | |||||
Change in other assets
|
— | 4,073 | ||||||
Change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
56,215 | 82,113 | ||||||
Change in customer deposits
|
(8,685 | ) | 6,901 | |||||
Change in income tax refunds receivable
|
— | 121,802 | ||||||
Change in other liabilities
|
(10,418 | ) | (636 | ) | ||||
Change in other liabilities and accrued interest - related parties
|
749 | 8,884 | ||||||
Change in royalties payable - related parties
|
18,381 | 19,962 | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(307,470 | ) | (92,172 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Sale of fixed asset
|
5,000 | — | ||||||
Purchase of fixed assets
|
— | (6,786 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
5,000 | (6,786 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds from borrowing on convertible debentures
|
392,500 | — | ||||||
Proceeds from short term loan exachanged for stock
|
500 | — | ||||||
Proceeds from borrowing on loan payable
|
— | 180,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from borrowings on notes payable
|
35,764 | — | ||||||
Principal payments on notes payable
|
(1,950 | ) | (23,844 | ) | ||||
Principal payments on notes payable - related parties
|
— | (25,751 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
426,814 | 130,405 | ||||||
Net change in cash
|
124,344 | 31,447 | ||||||
Cash, beginning of period
|
4,171 | 2,713 | ||||||
Cash, end of period
|
$ | 128,515 | $ | 34,160 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | 54,154 | $ | 45,758 | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes
|
$ | — | $ | — |
See Accompanying Unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
BROWNIE'S MARINE GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing activities and future operating activities:
|
||||||||
Convertible debenture issued for prepaid inventory
|
$ | 76,000 | $ | — | ||||
Discounts on convertible debentures
|
$ | 468,500 | $ | — | ||||
Preferred stock issued for forgiveness of note-payable - related party
|
$ | 42,500 | $ | — | ||||
Stock issued for prepaid inventory
|
$ | 38,000 | $ | — | ||||
Write-off of fully depreciated fixed asset sold
|
$ | 20,938 | $ | — | ||||
Convertible debenture converted to stock
|
$ | 2,900 | $ | — | ||||
Repayment of short term loan with stock
|
$ | 500 | $ | — | ||||
Issuance of stock in consideration of personal guarantees
|
$ | 1,000,000 | $ | — |
See Accompanying Unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of business –Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”, “We”, or “BWMG”) designs, tests, manufactures and distributes recreational hookah diving, yacht based scuba air compressor and nitrox generation systems, and scuba and water safety products through its wholly owned subsidiary Trebor Industries, Inc. The Company sells its products both on a wholesale and retail basis, and does so from its headquarters and manufacturing facility in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The Company does business as (dba) Brownie’s Third Lung, the dba name of Trebor Industries, Inc. The Company’s common stock is quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “BWMG”.
Definition of fiscal year – The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.
Use of estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications – Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2010 financial statement amounts to conform to the 2011 financial statement presentation.
Cash and equivalents – Only highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less are classified as cash and equivalents. These investments are stated at cost, which approximates market value.
Going Concern –The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for the twelve-month period following the date of these financial statements. However, we have incurred losses since 2009, and expect to have losses into a portion of 2011. We have had a working capital deficit since 2009. Although cured effective the fourth quarter 2010, the Company defaulted on its first mortgage in the third quarter of 2010, which resulted in an automatic default on its second mortgage further discussed in Note. 9. NOTES PAYABLE.
During the third quarter of 2010, the Company settled several lawsuits for infringement of one of the Company’s patents. The settlement was in the form of cash and inventory credits, and the Company was granted exclusive distributor rights in the United States of the products of the settling parties, as well as non-exclusive distributor rights for others as further discussed in Note 14. PATENT INFRINGEMENT SETTLEMENTS. In addition, the Company introduced some of its own new products to market in mid 2010, including the variable speed electric and battery powered diving units. We believe the combined addition of these products to complement the sales of our other products will allow us to generate enough sales to supply us with sufficient working capital in the future. However, the Company does not expect that existing cash flow will be sufficient to fund presently anticipated operations beyond the third quarter of 2011. This raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
We will need to raise additional funds and are currently exploring alternative sources of financing. We have issued a number of convertible debentures as an interim measure to finance our working capital needs as discussed in Note 10. CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES, and are in the process of raising additional capital through sale of restricted common stock as discussed in Note 18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS. We have implemented some cost saving measures and will continue to explore more to reduce operating expenses.
If we fail to raise additional funds when needed, or do not have sufficient cash flows from sales, we may be required to scale back or cease operations, liquidate our assets and possibly seek bankruptcy protection. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
6
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Inventory – Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is principally determined by using the average cost method that approximates the First-In, First-Out (FIFO) method of accounting for inventory. Inventory consists of raw materials as well as finished goods held for sale. The Company’s management monitors the inventory for excess and obsolete items and makes necessary valuation adjustments when required.
Property, Plant, and Equipment – Property, Plant and Equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are primarily 3 to 5 years except for the building that is being depreciated over a life of 39 years. The cost of repairs and maintenance is charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for property betterments and renewals are capitalized. Upon sale or other disposition of a depreciable asset, cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in other income (expense).
The Company periodically evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful lives of fixed assets or whether the remaining balance of fixed assets should be evaluated for possible impairment. The Company uses an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of the fixed assets in measuring their recoverability.
Revenue recognition – Revenues from product sales are recognized when the Company’s products are shipped or when service is rendered. Revenues from fixed-price contracts are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of cost incurred to date to estimated total cost of each contract. This method is used because management considers the percentage of cost incurred to date to estimated total cost to be the best available measure of progress on the contracts.
Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs, and depreciation costs. General and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Change in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined.
Revenue and costs incurred for time and material projects are recognized as the work is performed.
Product development costs – Product development expenditures are charged to expenses as incurred.
Advertising and marketing costs – The Company expenses the costs of producing advertisements and marketing material at the time production occurs, and expenses the costs of communicating advertisements and participating in trade shows in the period in which they occur. Advertising and trade show expense incurred for the three months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, was $9,055 and $3,760, respectively. Advertising and trade show expense incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, was $14,471 and $9,802, respectively.
Customer deposits and return policy – The Company takes a minimum 50% deposit against custom and large tankfill systems prior to ordering and/or building the systems. The remaining balance due is payable upon delivery, shipment, or installation of the system. There is no provision for cancellation of custom orders once the deposit is accepted, nor return of the custom ordered product. Additionally, returns of all other merchandise are subject to a 15% restocking fee as stated on each sales invoice.
7
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Income taxes – The Company accounts for its income taxes under the assets and liabilities method, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent the Company believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets that do not meet the criteria for recognition. In the event the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, they would make an adjustment to the valuation allowance which would reduce the provision for income taxes.
The Company follows the accounting guidance which provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized initially and in subsequent periods. Also included is guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
Comprehensive income – The Company has no components of other comprehensive income. Accordingly, net income equals comprehensive income for all periods.
Stock-based compensation – The Company accounts for all compensation related to stock, options or warrants using a fair value based method whereby compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. The Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation model to calculate the fair value of options and warrants issued to both employees and non-employees. Stock issued for compensation is valued on the effective date of the agreement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which includes determination of the fair value of the share-based transaction. The fair value has been determined either through use of the quoted stock price unless the trading activity is nominal, which may indicate it does not represent the fair value. Under these circumstances, the Company determines fair value through an analysis of its fair value of net assets and comparable publicly traded companies that have higher trading volumes with similar results of operations and industries.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company amortized prepaid stock based compensation associated with stock options granted October 1 and December 1, 2009. See Note 12. EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN for further discussion. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded stock based compensation associated with warrants granted on December 31, 2009. See Note 11. STOCK WARRANTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES for further discussion. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the company granted stock for consulting services. See Note 13. STOCK ISSUED FOR CONSULTING SERVICES. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded interest and compensation expense for issuance of convertible preferred stock and restricted stock to the Company's Chief Executive Officer. See Note 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS for further discussion.
Beneficial conversion features on convertible debentures –The fair value of the stock upon which the beneficial conversion feature (BCF) computation is based has been determined either through use of the quoted stock price unless the trading activity is nominal, which may indicate it does not represent the fair value. Under these circumstances, the Company determines fair value through an analysis of its fair value of net assets and comparable publicly traded companies that have higher trading volumes with similar results of operations and industries. See Note10. CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES for further discussion.
8
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Fair value of financial instruments – The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature.
Earnings per common share – Basic earnings per share excludes any dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of outstanding common shares during the applicable period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common and common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common stock equivalent shares are excluded from the computation if their effect is antidilutive. All common stock equivalent shares were excluded in the computation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, since their effect was antidilutive.
New accounting pronouncements – In January 2011, the FASB released Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-01 (“ASU 2011-01”), Receivables (Topic 310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20, which deferred the disclosure requirements surrounding troubled debt restructurings. These disclosures are effective for reporting periods ending on or after June 15, 2011. We do not expect the disclosure requirements to have a material impact on our current disclosures.
In April 2011, the FASB released Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-02 (“ASU 2011-02”), Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. ASU 2011-02 clarifies the guidance for determining whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, a creditor must conclude that 1) the restructuring constitutes a concession and 2) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. ASU 2011-02 also requires companies to disclose the troubled debt restructuring disclosures that were deferred by ASU 2011-01. The guidance in ASU 2011-02 is effective for public companies in the first reporting period ending on or after June 15, 2011, but the amendment must be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. ASU 2011-02 is not expected to materially impact our consolidated financial statements.
2. INVENTORY
Inventory consists of the following as of:
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
Raw materials
|
$ | 295,339 | $ | 333,107 | ||||
Work in process
|
— | — | ||||||
Finished goods
|
201,271 | 192,488 | ||||||
$ | 496,610 | $ | 525,595 |
3. PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Prepaid expenses and other current assets totaling $177,480 at June 30, 2011, consists of $119,685 of prepaid inventory, $37,500 of prepaid advertising, $20,258 of prepaid insurance, and $37 other prepaid expenses and current assets.
Prepaid expenses and other current assets totaling $36,484 at December 31, 2010, consists of $15,435 credit toward inventory resulting from patent infringement settlements, $8,662 of prepaid inventory, $10,736 of prepaid insurance, $1,651 of prepaid software maintenance.
9
4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following as of:
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
Building, building improvements, and land
|
$ | 1,224,962 | $ | 1,224,962 | ||||
Furniture, fixtures, vehicles and equipment
|
103,229 | 124,197 | ||||||
1,328,221 | 1,349,159 | |||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
( 205,787 | ) | ( 209,248 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,122,434 | $ | 1,139,911 |
5.
|
CUSTOMER CREDIT CONCENTRATIONS
|
The Company sells to three entities owned by the brother of Robert Carmichael, the Company’s Chief Executive officer as further discussed in Note 6 – RELATED PARTIES TRANSACTIONS. Combined sales to these entities for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 represented 26.97% and 32.33%, respectively, of total net revenues. Combined sales to these entities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 represented 32.71% and 31.90%, respectively, of total net revenues. Sales to no other customers represented greater than 10% of net revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
6.
|
RELATED PARTIES TRANSACTIONS
|
Notes payable – related parties
Notes payable – related parties – consists of the following as of June 30, 2011:
Promissory note payable to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, unsecured, bearing interest at 7.5% per annum, due in monthly principal and interest payments of $7,050, maturing on August 1, 2013.
|
$ | 249,434 | ||
Promissory note payable due an entity in which the Company’s Chief Executive Officer has a financial interest, GKR Associates, LLC., secured by third mortgage on real property, having a carrying value of $1,107,278 at June 30, 2011, bearing 6.99% interest per annum, due in monthly principal and interest payments of $1,980, maturing on February 22, 2012.
|
37,260 | |||
286,694 | ||||
Less amounts due within one year
|
204,986 | |||
Long-term portion of notes payable – related parties
|
$ | 81,708 |
As of June 30, 2011, principal payments on the notes payable – related parties are as follows:
2011
|
$ | 162,452 | ||
2012
|
82,159 | |||
2013
|
42,083 | |||
2014
|
— | |||
2015
|
— | |||
Thereafter
|
— | |||
$ | 286,694 |
10
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
6.
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)
|
As of June 30, 2011, the Company was approximately nineteen months in arrears on payments due under the Note payable to the Chief Executive Officer. No default notice has been received and the Company plans to make payments as able. See Other liabilities and accrued interest– related parties within this Note for the related accrued interest in arrears. On April 21, 2011, the Company issued 425,000 shares of preferred stock, designated as Series “A” Convertible Preferred Stock, to Robert Carmichael in consideration for forgiveness of $42,500 due under the Note payable to Chief Executive Officer. The Series “A” Convertible Preferred Stock may be converted to common stock at a rate of $.01 per share, or 42,500,000 shares of common stock. The fair market value per common share upon which the transaction was based was $.05. Accordingly, the Company recognized $2,082,500 as interest expense – related party as part of the transaction.
On February 12, 2010, as part of the requirements for conversion of its non-related party, revolving line of credit to a term loan, the Company converted GKR Associates, LLC’s (GKR) second mortgage to a third mortgage. See Note 9. NOTES PAYABLE for further discussion. The Company was twelve months in arrears on mortgage payments due GKR at June 30, 2011. No default notice has been received and the Company plans to make payments as able.
Notes payable – related parties consists of the following as of December 31, 2010:
Promissory note payable to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, unsecured, bearing interest at 7.5% per annum, due in monthly principal and interest payments of $7,050, maturing on August 1, 2013.
|
$ | 291,934 | ||
Promissory note payable due an entity in which the Company’s Chief Executive Officer has a financial interest, GKR Associates, LLC., secured by third mortgage on real property, having a carrying value of $1,107,278 at June 30, 2011, bearing 6.99% interest per annum, due in monthly principal and interest payments of $1,980, maturing on February 22, 2012.
|
37,260 | |||
329,194 | ||||
Less amounts due within one year
|
205,180 | |||
Long-term portion of notes payable – related parties
|
$ | 124,014 |
Net revenues and accounts receivable – related parties – The Company sells products to three entities, Brownie’s Southport Divers, Inc., Brownie’s Palm Beach Divers, and Brownie’s Yacht Toys, owned by the brother of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Terms of sale are no more favorable than those extended to any of the Company’s other customers. Combined net revenues from these entities for three months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, was $161,043 and $212,770, respectively. Combined net revenues from these entities for six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, was $314,437 and $358,037, respectively. Accounts receivable from Brownie’s SouthPort Diver’s, Inc., Brownie’s Palm Beach Divers, and Brownie’s Yacht Toys at June 30, 2011, was $34,160, $10,167, and $12,567, respectively. Accounts receivable from Brownie’s SouthPort Diver’s, Inc., Brownie’s Palm Beach Divers, and Brownie’s Yacht Toys at December 31, 2010, was $13,777, $4,753, and $5,468, respectively.
11
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
6.
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)
|
Royalties expense – related parties – The Company has Non-Exclusive License Agreements with 940 Associates, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “940A”), an entity owned by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, to license product patents it owns. Under the terms of the license agreements effective January 1, 2005, the Company pays 940A $2.00 per licensed product sold, rates increasing 5% annually. Also with 940A, the Company has an Exclusive License Agreement to license the trademark “Brownies Third Lung”, “Tankfill”, “Brownies Public Safety” and various other related trademarks as listed in the agreement. Based on this license agreement, the Company pays 940A 2.5% of gross revenues per quarter. Total royalty expense for the above agreements for three months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, is disclosed on the face of the balance sheet. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was approximately twenty-three months in arrears on royalty payments due. No default notice has been received and the Company plans to make payments as able.
Patent purchase agreements – In the first quarter of 2010, the Carleigh Rae Corporation (herein referred to as “CRC”), an entity that the Company’s Chief Executive Officer has an ownership interest, transferred ownership rights to the Company of patents previously subject to Non-Exclusive License Agreements. Effective September 24, 2010, the Company finalized and executed terms of the purchase from CRC for payment of $25,500 and 371,250 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, the CRC is entitled to a percentage of future sales amounting to $8,250 of products the Company is to receive in conjunction with two patent infringement lawsuits settled in the third quarter of 2010. For financial reporting purposes the Company valued the group of patents at $0 which is the lower of CRC’s historical cost as compared to the fair market value of the stock. Accordingly, the Company realized a $182,250 loss on the transaction comprised of $148,500 fair market value of the stock on the September, 30, 2010 grant date less the $0 historical cost, plus the $25,500 cash, plus the $8,250 liability. See Other liabilities and accrued interest– related parties below for inclusion of the $8,250. By acquiring the IP the Company (i) has an opportunity to further develop the IP, (ii) has the ability to incorporate the IP into current and future products, and (iii) has the opportunity to license the IP to third parties. In addition, see Note 14. PATENT INFRINGEMENT SETTLEMENT for further discussion on income earned in the third quarter of 2010, from the Company’s successful settlement of several lawsuits for infringement of one of these patents.
Other liabilities and accrued interest– related parties
Other liabilities and accrued interest– related parties consists of the following at:
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
Accrued interest on Notes payable – related parties
|
$ | 24,279 | $ | 23,530 | ||||
Due to Principals of Carleigh Rae Corp., net
|
8,222 | 8,222 | ||||||
Other liabilities – related parties
|
$ | 32,501 | $ | 31,752 |
As of June 30, 2011, the Company was approximately twenty-three months in arrears on accrued interest due under the Note payable to the Chief Executive Officer. No default notice has been received and the Company plans to make payments as able. The $8,222 due the Principals of the Carleigh Rae Corp. resulted as part of the patent infringement settlements received by the Company and further discussed in Note 14. PATENT INFRINGEMENT SETTLEMENTS.
Restricted common stock issued for personal guarantee – On April 21, 2011, the Company granted Robert Carmichael, the Chief Executive Officer, 20,000,000 shares of restricted common stock in consideration of personal guarantees he provided to secure restatement and consolidation of the first and second mortgages of the Company. The restrictions on the common stock will expire 50% on April 20, 2012, and 50% on April 20, 2013, if Mr. Carmichael continues his full time employment with the Company. The company valued the stock at $.05 per share and will record $1,000,000 of compensation expense to Mr. Carmichael ratably over the two-year term in which the restrictions expire. The unearned balance of the compensation is recorded as prepaid compensation as a component of shareholders’ deficit. As of the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized $112,500 as amortization of prepaid compensation under this agreement. Prepaid compensation remaining under this agreement as of June 30, 2011 is $887,500 and is reflected as a component of stockholders' deficit.
12
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
7.
|
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $566,856 at June 30, 2011, consists of $269,321 accounts payable trade, $60,574 balance of legal expense that was a Company expense prior to the reverse merger with Trebor Industries, Inc., $77,619 accrued payroll and related fringe benefits, $89,989 accrued sales and payroll taxes and withholding, $29,359 accrued real estate taxes, $35,994 accrued interest, and $4,000 other accrued liabilities.
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $510,642 at December 31, 2010, consists of $324,560 accounts payable trade, $60,574 balance of legal expense that was a Company expense prior to the reverse merger with Trebor Industries, Inc., $73,689 accrued payroll and related fringe benefits, $18,978 accrued real estate taxes, $28,295 accrued interest, and $4,546 other accrued liabilities.
8. OTHER LIABILITIES
Other liabilities of $2,928 at June 30, 2011, consists of on-line training liability.
Other liabilities of $13,346 at December 31, 2010, consists of $2,681 of on-line training liability, and $10,665 accrued legal fees and costs associated with default under the Company’s first and second mortgages. See Note 9. NOTES PAYABLE for discussion related to consolidation and restatement of promissory note.
Effective July 1, 2005, the Company began including on-line training certificates with all hookah units sold. The training certificates entitle the holder to an on-line interactive course at no additional charge to the holder. The number of on-line training certificates issued per unit is the same as the number of divers the unit as sold is designed to accommodate (i.e., a three diver unit configuration comes with three on-line training certificates). The certificates have an eighteen-month redemption life after which time they expire. The eighteen-month life of the certificates begins at the time the customer purchases the unit. The Company owes the on-line training vendor the agreed upon negotiated rate for all on-line certificates redeemed payable at the time of redemption. For certificates that expire without redemption, no amount is due the on-line training vendor.
The Company estimates the on-line training liability based on the historical redemption rate of approximately 10%. The Company continues to monitor and maintain a reserve for certificate redemption that approximates the historical redemption rate.
9.
|
NOTES PAYABLE
|
Notes payable consists of the following as of June 30, 2011:
Promissory note payable secured by a first mortgage on the real property of the Company having a carrying value of $1,107,278 at June 30, 2011, bearing interest at 7.5% per annum, due in monthly interest only payments beginning on February 22, 2011, maturing on May 22, 2012, with balloon payment of principal and any accrued and unpaid interest.
|
$ | 1,053,993 | ||
Promissory note payable, unsecured, bearing interest at 5% per annum, due in monthly principal and interest payments of $2000, maturing on August 31, 2012.
|
33,814 | |||
1,087,807 | ||||
Less amounts due within one year
|
1,084,586 | |||
Long-term portion of notes payable
|
$ | 3,221 |
13
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
9.
|
NOTES PAYABLE (continued)
|
As of June 30, 2011, principal payments on the notes payable are as follows:
2011
|
$ | 18,845 | ||
2012
|
1,068,962 | |||
2013
|
— | |||
2014
|
— | |||
2015
|
— | |||
Thereafter
|
— | |||
$ | 1,087,807 |
On February 18, 2011, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Trebor Industries, Inc., entered into a Forbearance Agreement with Branch Banking and Trust Company (“BBT”) for the promissory note in the principal amount of $1,000,000 in favor of BBT (the “Term Loan”) and the promissory note in the principal amount of $199,990.98 in favor of BBT (the “Second Note”). The Term Loan and Second Note are collectively referred to as the “Secured Notes”. The Secured Notes are secured by the Company's Fort Lauderdale facilities and personally guaranteed by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. As previously disclosed, the Company failed to bring the Secured Notes current and in January 2011 BBT accelerated the full principal and accrued interest due under the Secured Notes, as well as initiated collection and legal action. The Forbearance Agreement effectively extends the maturity date of the Secured Notes to May 22, 2012. The Secured Notes were consolidated under a Consolidated and Restated Promissory Note in the principal amount of $1,053,993, effective November 22, 2010, (the “Consolidated Note”). The maturity date of the Consolidated Note is May 22, 2012, and may be prepaid at any time. The interest rate on the Consolidated Note is 7.5% per annum. Pursuant to the Forbearance Agreement the Company paid $33,000 to BBT at closing. In addition to the monthly interest only payments required under the Consolidated Note, Trebor was required to pay BBT $6,028 by February 28, 2011, and monthly payments of approximately $3,555 on March 10, 2011, April 10, 2011, and May 10, 2011, to satisfy disbursements, costs and expenses associated with the Forbearance Agreement.
Under the Consolidated note, the Company accrued $10,665 of legal fees and costs as of December 31, 2010, which is reflected in Other liabilities. In addition, the Company accrued interest through December 31, 2010, and this is reflected in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
In February 2011, the Company converted a vendor payable into an unsecured promissory note as reflected above in the table summarizing notes payable as of June 30, 2011. Principal and interest payments of $2,000 per month were to begin on February 28, 2011, and continue through August 31, 2012, maturity. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was in arrears on approximately four-month’s payments. No default notice has been received and the Company plans to make payments as soon as it is able.
Notes payable consists of the following as of December 31, 2010:
Promissory note payable secured by a first mortgage on the real property of the Company having a carrying value of $1,120,994 at December 31, 2010, bearing interest at 7.5% per annum, due in monthly interest only payments beginning on February 22, 2011, maturing on May 22, 2012, with balloon payment of principal and any accrued and unpaid interest.
|
$ | 1,053,993 | ||
Less amounts due within one year
|
— | |||
Long-term portion of notes payable
|
$ | 1,053,993 |
14
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
10.
|
CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
|
The Company has outstanding convertible debentures as of June 30, 2011, as follows:
Effective October 4, 2010, the Company converted an accounts payable for legal services to a $20,635 convertible debenture. The debenture matures on April 4, 2011, and bears interest at 5% per annum. At the option of the lender, the principal amount of the note plus any accrued interest may be converted in whole or in part into Common Stock at the conversion price per share of $.001 by written notice. The lender will be limited to maximum conversion of 4.99% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company at any one time. The debenture and the shares referenced within the debenture may be assignable in whole or in part to a third party at any time during the term.
The Company valued the beneficial conversion feature (BCF) of the convertible debenture at $20,635, the “ceiling” of its intrinsic value. Accordingly, the $20,635 debenture is discounted by the amount of the BCF. The Company will accrete the discount to the convertible debenture and recognize interest expense through its maturity on April 4, 2011. At maturity the Company did not redeem the convertible debenture and the holder sold and assigned it to an unrelated third party for the face value of the debenture. At June 30, 2011, the balance of the convertible debenture is $17,735, which is $20,635 debenture, less $20,635 discount, plus $20,635 accretion, less $2,900 converted to stock. At December 31, 2010, the balance of the convertible debenture is $10,318 which is $20,635 debenture, less $20,635 discount, plus $10,318 of accretion.
Effective November 27, 2010, the Company purchased exclusive rights for license of certain intellectual property from an unrelated party for an initial sum of $125,000. Payment was in the form of a convertible debenture bearing simple interest of 10% per annum to accrue until maturity. The parties agreed to a royalty of 2.5% of net revenues generated from the sale, sub-license or use of the technology or a reasonable negotiated rate based on similar invention. The debenture is convertible to common shares of the Company at May 27, 2011, along with accrued interest at the option of the lender. Conversion price per share is 30% discount as determined from the weighted average of the preceding 12 trading days’ closing market price.
The Company valued the BCF of the convertible debenture at $53,517, its intrinsic value. Accordingly, the $125,000 debenture is discounted by the amount of the BCF. The Company will accrete the discount to the convertible debenture and recognize interest expense through its maturity on May 27, 2011. At June 30, 2011, the balance of the convertible debenture is $125,000, which is $125,000 debenture, less $53,571 discount, plus $53,571 of accretion. At December 31, 2010, the balance of the convertible debenture is $80,358, which is $125,000 debenture, less $53,571 discount, plus $8,929 of accretion. Because there is no assurance of success and the invention is still in design and pre-prototype phase, the Company recorded the initial net value of the debenture, $71,483, as research and development expense. Both parties have agreed to confidentiality regarding the invention during the pre-prototype stage. In addition, the Company has agreed to provide the licensor with design services, as well as assist in completing the prototype and initial production at the Company’s prevailing wholesale rate for comparable services.
Effective January 7, 2011, the Company ratified a technology and license agreement with commitment for purchase of inventory related to an agreement signed in 2010, which set pricing for products if minimum quantity purchases were met. Since the Company did not purchase the minimum quantities, but desired to maintain the technology and licensing rights along with the pricing, it agreed to purchase the 2010 balance shortage in 2011, as well as the 2011 minimum quantities. The agreement required the Company issue a convertible debenture for $76,000, and $38,000 of restricted common stock at $.15 per share. On January 7, 2011, the Company issued a $76,000 convertible debenture for purchase of the product with $28,000 maturing on June 7, 2011, and $48,000 maturing on November 12, 2011. The debenture bears interest as 5% per annum. The lender at their option may convert all or part of the note plus accrued interest into common stock at a price of thirty percent (30%) discount as determined from the average four (4) deep highest closing bid prices over the preceding five (5) trading days. On June 1, 2011, the Company issued 253,334 shares of restricted common stock at $.15 per share, or $38,000 as required by the agreement.
15
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
10.
|
CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES (continued)
|
The Company valued the BCF of the convertible debenture at $76,000, the “ceiling” of its intrinsic value. Accordingly, the $76,000 debenture is discounted by the amount of the BCF. The Company will accrete the discount to the convertible debenture and recognize interest expense through its maturity on November 12, 2011. At June 30, 2011, the balance of the convertible debenture is $24,000, which is $76,000 debenture, less $76,000 discount, plus $24,000 accretion.
On February 10, 2011, the Company borrowed $42,500 in exchange for a convertible debenture. The debenture bears 8% interest per annum and matures on November 14, 2011. The interest rate on the debenture will revert to 22% per annum upon nonpayment of any amounts when due. Beginning 180 days after the date of the debenture, the lender may convert the note to common shares at a 42% discount of the “Market Price” of the stock based on the average of the lowest three (3) closing bid prices on the date prior to the notice of conversion. In addition, if the Company grants a lower price for common stock purchase or conversion to anyone else during the term of this agreement, the lender’s conversion price will be adjusted downward to the same. Since as of March 31, 2011, the Company has another outstanding debenture with a conversion price to common shares at $.001, this conversion price would also apply to this debenture. The lender cannot convert an amount greater than 4.99% of the outstanding common stock at any one time. The Company may prepay the debenture at any time before maturity at graduated amounts depending on the date of prepayment ranging from 130% to 150% of the debenture balance plus accrued and unpaid interest. There is a $2,000 per day penalty for not timely delivering shares upon conversion notice. The Company is also required to maintain a reserve of shares sufficient to cover the lender’s conversion to common stock of the total amount of the debenture. The Company has issued and reserved 1,465,517 shares through June 30, 2011, related to this debenture.
The Company valued the BCF of the convertible debenture at $42,500, the “ceiling” of its intrinsic value. Accordingly, the $42,500 debenture is discounted by the amount of the BCF. The Company will accrete the discount to the convertible debenture and recognize interest expense through its maturity on November 14, 2011. At June 30, 2011, the balance of the convertible debenture is $21,250, which is $42,500 debenture, less $42,500 discount, plus $21,250 accretion.
On March 9, 2011, the Company borrowed $50,000 in exchange for a convertible debenture maturing on March 9, 2012. The Debenture bears 10% interest per annum. The lender may at any time convert any portion of the debenture to common shares at a 30% discount of the “Market Price” of the stock based on the average of the previous ten (10) days weighted average closing prices on the date prior to the notice of conversion. The Company may prepay the debenture plus accrued interest at any time before maturity. In addition, as further inducement for loaning the Company the funds, the Company granted the lender 50,000 and 100,000 warrants at $.25 and $.35 per share, respectively. As a result, the Company had to allocate fair market value (“FMV”) to both the BCF and to the warrants. The Company determined the FMV of the warrants as $7,500 using the Black-Scholes valuation model.
Since the combined FMV allocated to the warrants and BCF cannot exceed the convertible debenture amount (“the ceiling”), the BCF was valued at $50,000, the “ceiling” of its intrinsic value. Accordingly, the $50,000 debenture is discounted by the BCF and the warrants. The Company will accrete the discount to the convertible debenture and recognize interest expense through its maturity on March 9, 2012. At June 30, 2011, the balance of the convertible debenture is $15,457, which is $50,000 debenture, net $50,000 discount, plus $15,457 accretion.
16
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
10.
|
CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES (continued)
|
On May 3, 2011, the Company borrowed $300,000 in exchange for a convertible debenture maturing on May 5, 2012. The Debenture bears 10% interest per annum. The lender may at any time convert any portion of the debenture to common shares at a 30% discount of the “Market Price” of the stock based on the average of the previous ten (10) days weighted average closing prices on the date prior to the notice of conversion. The Company may prepay the debenture plus accrued interest at any time before maturity. In addition, as further inducement for loaning the Company the funds, the Company granted the lender 300,000 and 600,000 warrants at $.25 and $.35 per share, respectively. As a result, the Company had to allocate fair market value (“FMV”) to both the BCF and to the warrants. The Company determined the FMV of the warrants as $7,500 using the Black-Scholes valuation model.
Since the combined FMV allocated to the warrants and BCF cannot exceed the convertible debenture amount (“the ceiling”), the BCF was valued at $300,000, the “ceiling” of its intrinsic value. Accordingly, the $300,000 debenture is discounted by the BCF and the warrants. The Company will accrete the discount to the convertible debenture and recognize interest expense through its maturity on May 5, 2012. The Company will accrete the discount to the convertible debenture and recognize interest expense through its maturity on May 5, 2012. At June 30, 2011, the balance of the convertible debenture is $50,000, which is $300,000 debenture, less $300,000 discount, plus $50,000 accretion.
11.
|
STOCK WARRANTS FOR LEGAL SERVICE
|
Effective December 30, 2009, the Company issued to an outside attorney warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of restricted common stock for certain legal and advisory services to be performed in 2010, as evidenced by a signed proposal. The warrants are exercisable at fair market value as of the date of grant, and vested in two tranches of 50,000 each, on September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010, respectively. In addition, the agreement provides for a cashless exercise of the tranches. The fair value of the warrants was determined to be $25,000 using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The stock warrants are in lieu of payment for these services and as such the Company recognized operating expense over the term of the agreement. Accordingly, the Company recognized operating expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 of $6,250 and $12,500, respectively. As of June 30, 2011, the two tranches of warrants were unexercised.
12.
|
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
|
On August 22, 2007, the Company adopted an Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). Under the Plan, Stock Options may be granted to Employees, Directors, and Consultants in the form of Incentive Stock Options or Nonstatutory Stock Options. Stock Purchase Rights, time vested and/performance invested Restricted Stock, and Stock Appreciation Rights and Unrestricted Shares may also be granted under the Plan. The initial maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan shall be 400,000 shares, and no more than 100,000 Shares of Common Stock may be granted to any one Participant with respect to Options, Stock Purchase Rights and Stock Appreciation Rights during any one calendar year period. Common Stock to be issued under the Plan may be either authorized and unissued or shares held in treasury by the Company. The term of the Plan shall be ten years. The Board of Directors may amend, alter, suspend, or terminate the Plan at any time.
17
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
12.
|
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN (continued)
|
Effective October 1, 2009, and December 1, 2009, the Company granted 75,000 and 115,000 incentive stock options, respectively, to certain consultants under the Plan. The granting of these options exhausted all the options outstanding for grant under the plan. The fair value of the options was determined to be $47,500 using the Black-Scholes Model. The options that have a term of five years were issued in conjunction with consulting agreements business and financial advisory services. The stock options are in lieu of payment for these services and as such the Company will recognize operating expense over the term of the agreements. Accordingly, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized operating expense of $15,000 and $26,875, respectively. Prepaid equity based compensation is reflected as a component of shareholders’ deficit for the related consulting services yet to be provided at the end of the period. As of June 30, 2011, all consulting services under this plan had been provided.
13.
|
STOCK ISSUED FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
|
From April 16, through December 31, 2010, the Company granted a combined 674,932 shares of restricted common stock to eight consultants pursuant to individual consulting agreements. The consulting services provided for include predominantly management advisory services in the areas of sales, marketing, public relations, financing, and business development. Grant of the stock was in lieu of payment for these services. The length of consulting services under the agreements ranges from completed during the second quarter of 2010 through one year from effective transaction date, or July 1, 2011. The majority of the agreements expired on December 31, 2010. The Company recorded the transactions at the fair market value of the stock on the effective date of each transaction. The Company is recognizing operating expense over the term of the agreements. Accordingly, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized $19,336 and $41,856, respectively, as operating expense under the agreements.
On March 9, 2010, the Company granted 100,000 shares of restricted common stock pursuant to a consulting agreement for assistance in the planning, design, direction, supervision and implementation of Company's web design, marketing and advertising and in such other matters and areas as may be mutually approved by Consultant and Company. This agreement expired on December 31, 2010. The Company recorded the transaction at the fair market value of the stock on the effective date of the transaction, $.99 per share. The Company will amortize the operating expense over the term of the agreement. Accordingly, the Company recognized $9,900 as operating expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The agreement expires on December 31, 2010. This same consultant loaned the Company $100,000 during the first quarter of 2010, accepted a conversion of his loan to common stock in the third quarter of 2010, and became a member of the Board of Directors of the Company in December 2010.
14.
|
PATENT INFRINGEMENT SETTLEMENTS
|
In August 2010, the Company settled several lawsuits for infringement of one of the Company’s patents. The Company granted non-exclusive license of its patent to the settling parties along with future licensing and purchasing terms. In exchange, the Company was granted exclusive distributor rights in the United States of the products of the settling parties, as well as non-exclusive distributor rights for others. The Company acquired the subject patent from the Carleigh Rae Corporation, a related party, in 2010, and it is discussed in Note 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, Patent purchase agreements.
18
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
15.
|
INCOME TAXES
|
The components of the provision for income tax expense (benefit) are as follows for the three months ended:
June 30, 2011
|
June 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Current taxes
|
||||||||
Federal
|
$ | — | $ | — | ||||
State
|
— | — | ||||||
Current taxes
|
— | — | ||||||
Change in deferred taxes
|
(839,687 | ) | (68,931 | ) | ||||
Change in valuation allowance
|
856,848 | 41,658 | ||||||
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)
|
$ | 16,981 | $ | (27,273 | ) |
The components of the provision for income tax benefit are as follows for the six months ended:
June 30, 2011
|
June 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Current taxes
|
||||||||
Federal
|
$ | — | $ | — | ||||
State
|
— | — | ||||||
Current taxes
|
— | — | ||||||
Change in deferred taxes
|
(933,506 | ) | (188,757 | ) | ||||
Change in valuation allowance
|
930,563 | 93,141 | ||||||
Provision for income tax benefit
|
$ | (2,943 | ) | $ | (95,616 | ) |
The following is a summary of the significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities at June 30, 2011:
Deferred tax assets:
|
||||
Equity based compensation
|
$ | 21,743 | ||
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
9,520 | |||
Depreciation and amortization timing differences
|
(6,237 | ) | ||
Net operating loss carryforward
|
1,378,7443 | |||
On-line training certificate reserve
|
1,025 | |||
Total deferred tax assets
|
1,404,794 | |||
Valuation allowance
|
(1,293,073 | ) | ||
Deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance
|
111,721 | |||
Less deferred tax assets – non-current, net of valuation allowance
|
111,209 | |||
Deferred tax assets – current, net of valuation allowance
|
$ | 512 |
The effective tax rate used for calculation of the deferred taxes as of June 30, 2011 was 34%. The Company has established a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets of $1,288,313 due to the uncertainty regarding realization, comprised primarily of a 98% reserve against the deferred tax assets attributable to the equity based compensation, a 100% reserve against the allowance for doubtful accounts, and a 92% reserve against the net operating carryforward, and a 25% reserve against depreciation and amortization timing differences.
19
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
15. INCOME TAXES (continued)
The significant differences between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rates for the Company for the six months ended are as follows:
June 30, 2011
|
June 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Statutory tax rate benefit
|
— | % | — | % | ||||
Increase (decrease) in rates resulting from:
|
||||||||
Net operating loss carryforward or carryback
|
(34 | )% | (40 | )% | ||||
Equity based compensation and loss
|
— | % | 2 | % | ||||
Book/tax depreciation and amortization differences
|
— | % | (3 | ) % | ||||
Change in valuation allowance
|
34 | % | 20 | % | ||||
Other
|
— | % | — | % | ||||
Effective tax rate benefit
|
(— | )% | (21 | )% |
The following is a summary of the significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2010:
Deferred tax assets:
|
||||
Equity based compensation
|
$ | 21,743 | ||
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
5,100 | |||
Depreciation and amortization timing differences
|
(6,199 | ) | ||
Net operating loss carryforward
|
449,707 | |||
On-line training certificate reserve
|
938 | |||
Total deferred tax assets
|
471,289 | |||
Valuation allowance
|
(362,511 | ) | ||
Deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance
|
108,778 | |||
Less deferred tax assets – non-current, net of valuation allowance
|
108,309 | |||
Deferred tax assets – current, net of valuation allowance
|
$ | 469 |
The effective tax rate used for calculation of the deferred taxes as of December 31, 2010 was 34%. The Company has established a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets of $362,511 due to the uncertainty regarding realization, comprised primarily of a 98% reserve against the deferred tax assets attributable to the equity based compensation, a 100% reserve against the allowance for doubtful accounts, and a 75% reserve against the net operating carryforward, and a 25% reserve against depreciation and amortization timing differences.
16.
|
AUTHORIZATION OF PREFERRED STOCK
|
During the second quarter of 2010, the holder of the majority of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock approved an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorizing the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The preferred stock as authorized has such voting powers, designations, preferences, limitations, restrictions and relative rights as may be determined by our Board of Directors of the Company from time to time in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 78 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. Before modification, the existing Articles of Incorporation did not authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock. The Company authorized the preferred stock for the purpose of added flexibility in seeking capital and potential acquisition targets. The amendment authorizing the issuance of shares of preferred stock grants the Board authority, without further action by our stockholders, to designate and issue preferred stock in one or more series and to designate certain rights, preferences and restrictions of each series, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of the common stock. See Note 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS – Notes Payable for discussion regarding issuance of 425,000 shares of preferred stock for forgiveness of $42,500 Note payable to Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
20
BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
17.
|
LEGAL
|
On June 23, 2011, a claim was filed in the U.S. District Court of Dallas County, Texas by the Estate of Christopher Logan. Amount of damages sought were not provided in the claim. The claim lists eight defendants of which the Company is one. The claim asserts Mr. Logan died breathing carbon monoxide while diving with a T80G medium duty compressor (“T80G”). The claim’s cites belief by the plaintiff that the T80G was sold by Brownie’s based on representations made by Keene Engineering, Inc. also a manufacturer of dive compressors and also listed as a defendant. The Company believes the representation is erroneous because Brownie’s does not sell the make/model cited in the claim, and Brownie’s compressors have the brand name forged into the die-casting on the head of each cylinder. Therefore, Brownie’s believes this claim is without merit, and anticipates being dismissed from the lawsuit.
18.
|
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
|
On July 21, and July 27, 2011, the Company accepted $10,000 and $5,000, respectively toward a private offering of shares of restricted common stock at a purchase price per share of $.01. The Company offered the shares through its officers and directors to “accredited investors” as defined in Rule 501 (as amended on July 21, 2010 by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
21
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Introductory Statements
Information included or incorporated by reference in this filing may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology.
This filing contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding, among other things, (a) our projected sales and profitability, (b) our Company’s growth strategies, (c) our Company’s future financing plans and (d) our Company’s anticipated needs for working capital. These statements may be found under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business,” as well as in this prospectus generally. Actual events or results may differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under “Risk Factors” and matters described in this filing generally. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this filing will in fact occur.
Overview
Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (referred to herein as “BWMG”,“the Company”, “we” or “Brownie’s”), does business through its wholly owned subsidiary, Trebor Industries, Inc., d/b/a Brownie’s Third Lung, a Florida corporation. The Company designs, tests, manufactures and distributes recreational hookah diving, yacht based scuba air compressor and nitrox generation systems, and scuba and water safety products. BWMG sells its products both on a wholesale and retail basis, and does so from its headquarters and manufacturing facility in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The Company’s common stock is quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “BWMG”. The Company’s website is www.browniesmarinegroup.com.
Mr. Carmichael has operated Trebor as its President since 1986. Since April 16, 2004, Mr. Carmichael has served as President, Principal Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. From March 23, 2004 to April 26, 2004, Mr. Carmichael served as the Company’s Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer. He is the holder or co-holder of numerous patents that are used by Trebor and several other large original equipment manufacturers in the diving industry.
The Company’s diving and marine based products are generally marketed under the Brownie’s Third Lung, Brownie’s Tankfill, and Brownie’s Public Safety trade names.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011, As Compared To the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Net revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we had net revenues of $597,194 as compared to net revenues of $658,065 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $60,871, or 9.25%. Tankfill system and related sales declined approximately $140,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010. Hookah system and related sales increased approximately $70,000, and sales of public water safety products (ex. life jackets) increased approximately $5,000 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. The Company believes the depressed state of the economy continues to negatively impact sales as seen by the decline in tankfill system sales, but is encouraged by the increase in sales of hookah systems, and public water safety products. The Company’s products are largely non-essential, disposable income type items, and therefore are more likely to be sacrificed by consumers in preference for essential goods during depressed economic conditions.
22
Cost of net revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we had cost of net revenues of $398,026 as compared with cost of net revenues of $492,781 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $94,755, or 19.23%. The decrease in cost of net revenues is primarily a result of reduction in quantity of materials used resulting from the 9.25% decrease in net revenues, coupled with an approximate 10% decrease in material costs as a percentage of net revenues. The approximate 10% decline in material prices for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010 is attributed to the change in the sales mix. In the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the second quarter of 2010, more hookah system and related sales occurred and less tankfill system and related sales occurred. Of these products, those sold in the second quarter of 2011, had better profit margins than those sold in the second quarter of 2010.
Gross profit. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we had a gross profit of $199,168 as compared to gross profit of $165,284 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $33,884, or 20.50%. The increase is primarily attributable to the decrease in cost of net revenues resulting from the change in the sales mix, which is discussed in Cost of net revenues above.
Operating expenses. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we had total operating expenses of $408,289 as compared to total operating expenses of $368,731 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $39,558, or 10.73%. The $39,558 increase is due to an increase in selling, general and administrative costs of $40,318, net of $760 decrease in research and development costs as compared to the same period in 2010. The net increase in sales, general and administrative costs for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010, is primarily attributable to a an increase of approximately $43,709 in legal and accounting expenses, an increase in equity based (non-cash) compensation of approximately $25,000, and net of a decrease in other numerous accounts having individually insignificant increases and decreases. Year-end financial reporting and accounting services from accountants and attorneys occurred in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to the first quarter of 2010, resulting in the increase in their fees during this period.
Other expense, net. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we had other expense, net of $2,233,561 as compared to other expense, net of $115,566 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $2,117,995, or 1,832.71%. This account is comprised of other (income) expense, net, and interest expense. Interest expense for the period increased $2,115,343 and other income, net decreased $2,652. Other (income) expense, net, is comprised of transactions that are generally of a non recurring nature. The increase in interest expense of $2,115,343 is primarily attributable to approximately $107,234 accretion of discounts (non-cash) on convertible debentures issued during the fourth quarter of 2010 through the second quarter of 2011, as well as $2,082,500 interest expense (non-cash) on forgiveness of debt for preferred stock. The remaining net decrease is primarily due to a decrease in interest resulting from pay down of a portion of a note-payable with restricted stock, net an increase in interest on convertible debentures, which did not exist during the second quarter of 2010.
Provision for income tax expense (benefit). For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we had a provision for income tax expense (benefit) of $16,981, as compared to a provision for income tax expense (benefit) of ($27,273) for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase in the provision for income tax expense of $44,254, or 162.26%. The increase in provision for income tax expense is primarily a result of the increase in valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset attributable to realization of the net operating loss carryforward.
Net loss. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we had net loss of $2,459,663 as compared to net loss of $291,740 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $2,167,923, or 743.10%. The increase in net loss is attributable to $33,884 increase in gross profit, $39,558 increase in operating expenses, $2,117,995 increase in other expense, net, and $44,254 increase in provision for income tax expense.
Results of Operations for the Six Months ended June 30, 2011, As Compared To the Six Months ended June 30, 2010
Net revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we had net revenues of $960,094 as compared to net revenues of $1,122,248 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $162,154, or 14.45%. Tankfill system and related sales declined approximately $250,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. Hookah system and related sales increased approximately $65,000, and sales of public water safety products (ex. life jackets) increased approximately $4,000 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The Company believes the depressed state of the economy continues to negatively impact sales as is seen by the decline in tankfill system sales, but is encouraged by the increase in sales of hookah systems and public water safety products. The Company’s products are largely non-essential, disposable income type items, and therefore are more likely to be sacrificed by consumers in preference for essential goods during depressed economic conditions.
23
Cost of net revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we had cost of net revenues of $737,608 as compared with cost of net revenues of $884,508 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $146,900, or 16.61%. The decrease in cost of net revenues is primarily a result of reduction in quantity of materials used resulting from the 14.45% decrease in net revenues, net of an approximate 8% decrease in material costs as a percentage of net revenues, and a 4% increase in freight costs, and 2% increase in other costs. The approximate 8% decline in material prices for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010 is attributed to the change in the sales mix. In the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the second quarter of 2010, more hookah system and related sales occurred and less tankfill system and related sales occurred. Of these products, those sold during the six months ended June 30, 2011, had better profit margins than those sold during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Gross profit. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we had a gross profit of $222,486 as compared to gross profit of $237,740 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $15,254, or 6.42%. The decrease is primarily attributable to the decrease in Net revenues.
Operating expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we had total operating expenses of $637,919 as compared to total operating expenses of $642,454 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $4,535, or less than 1%.
Other expense, net. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we had other expense, net of $2,320,577 as compared to other expense, net of $50,796 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $2,269,781, or 4,468.42%. This account is comprised of other (income) expense, net, and interest expense. Interest expense for the period increased $2,271,390 and other income, net increased $1,609. Other (income) expense, net, is comprised of transactions that are generally of a non-recurring nature. The increase in interest expense of $2,271,390 is primarily attributable to approximately $165,666 accretion of discounts (non-cash) on convertible debentures issued during the fourth quarter of 2010 through the second quarter of 2011, as well as $2,082,500 interest expense (non-cash) on forgiveness of debt for preferred stock. The remaining net increase is primarily due to an increase in interest on convertible debentures, which did not exist during the six months ended 2011, net a decrease in interest resulting from pay down of a portion of a note-payable with restricted stock in the second quarter of 2011.
Provision for income tax expense (benefit). For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we had a provision for income tax expense (benefit) of ($2,943), as compared to a provision for income tax expense (benefit) of ($95,616) for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease in the provision for income tax benefit of $92,673, or 96.92%. The decrease in provision for income tax benefit is primarily a result of increase in the valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset attributable to realization of the net operating loss carryforward.
Net loss. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we had net loss of $2,733,067 as compared to net loss of $359,894 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $2,373,173, or 659.41%. The increase in net loss is attributable to $15,254 decrease in gross profit, $4,535 decrease in operating expenses, $2,269,781 increase in other expense, net, and $92,673 decrease in provision for income tax benefit.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30,2011, the Company had cash and current assets of $921,340 and current liabilities of $2,300,433 or a current ratio of .40 to 1. This represents a working capital deficit of $1,379,093. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had cash and current assets of $620,270 and current liabilities of $997,033 or a current ratio of .62 to 1. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had cash and current assets of $704,629 and current liabilities of $859,066, or a current ratio of .82 to 1.
24
The accompanying consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for the twelve-month period following the date of these financial statements. However, we have incurred losses since 2009, and expect to have losses into much of 2011. We have had a working capital deficit since 2009. Although cured effective the fourth quarter 2010, the Company defaulted on its first mortgage in the third quarter of 2010, which resulted in an automatic default on its second mortgage further discussed in Note. 9. NOTES PAYABLE of the Company’s financial statements.
During the third quarter of 2010, the Company settled several lawsuits for infringement of one of the Company’s patents. The settlement was in the form of cash and inventory credits, and the Company was granted exclusive distributor rights in the United States of the products of the settling parties, as well as non-exclusive distributor rights for others as discussed in Note 14. PATENT INFRINGEMENT SETTLEMENTS of the Company’s financial statements.
In addition, the Company introduced some of its own new products to market in mid 2010, including the variable speed electric and battery powered diving units. We believe the combined addition of these products to complement the sales of our other products will allow us to generate enough sales to supply us with sufficient working capital in the future. However, we do not expect that our existing cash flow will be sufficient to fund our presently anticipated operations beyond the third quarter of 2011. This raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
We will need to raise additional funds and are currently exploring alternative sources of financing. We have issued a number of convertible debentures as an interim measure to finance our working capital needs as discussed in Note 10. CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES, and shares of restricted common stock to financial our working capital needs as discussed in Note 18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS of the Company’s financial statements. We have implemented some cost saving measures and will continue to explore more to reduce operating expenses.
We currently seek to raise capital through private equity offerings and debt financing. Such financing may not be available when we need it or may not be available on terms that are favorable to us. If we raise additional capital through the sale of our securities, your ownership interest will be diluted and the terms of the financing may adversely affect your holdings or rights as stockholders.
If we fail to raise additional funds when needed, or do not have sufficient cash flows from sales, we may be required to scale back or cease operations, liquidate our assets and possibly seek bankruptcy protection. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Certain Business Risks
The Company is subject to various risks, which may materially harm its business, financial condition and results of operations. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this filing before deciding to purchase the Company’s common stock. These are not the only risks and uncertainties that the Company faces. If any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs, the Company’s business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed. In that case, the trading price of the Company’s common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Our auditors have raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
We do not expect that our existing cash flow will be sufficient to fund our presently anticipated operations beyond the third quarter of 2011. This raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We will need to raise additional funds and are currently exploring alternative sources of financing. We have issued a number of convertible debentures as an interim measure to finance our working capital needs. If we fail to raise additional funds when needed, or do not have sufficient cash flows from sales, we may be required to scale back or cease operations, liquidate our assets and possibly seek bankruptcy protection.
25
Failure to timely pay obligations as they come due could lead to significant financial obligations
We have issued a series of convertible debentures that convert at a discount to the market price of our common stock. We currently do not have working capital available to satify these notes. Failure to repay the notes could lead to significant penalties including acceleration of the due dates on the notes and penalties payable in both cash and stock. If in the future, if we fail to timely meet our financial obligations as they come due, our operating results, balances sheet and future ability to raise capital could be seriously harmed. Furthermore, conversion of the notes could result in substantial dilution to our shareholders.
Our Common Stock May Be Affected By Limited Trading Volume and May Fluctuate Significantly
Our common stock is traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. There is a limited public market for our common stock and there can be no assurance that an active trading market for our common stock will develop. As a result, this could adversely affect our shareholders’ ability to sell our common stock in short time periods, or possibly at all. Thinly traded common stock can be more volatile than common stock traded in an active public market. Our common stock has experienced, and is likely to experience in the future, significant price and volume fluctuations, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, we believe that factors such as quarterly fluctuations in our financial results and changes in the overall economy or the condition of the financial markets could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially.
Our Common Stock Is Deemed To Be “Penny Stock,” Which May Make It More Difficult For Investors to Sell Their Shares Due To Suitability Requirements
Our common stock is deemed to be “penny stock” as that term is defined under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system). Our common stock is covered by an SEC rule that imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors, which are generally institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000, or individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse.
Broker/dealers dealing in penny stocks are required to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks. Moreover, broker/dealers are required to determine whether an investment in a penny stock is a suitable investment for a prospective investor. These requirements may reduce the potential market for our common stock by reducing the number of potential investors. This may make it more difficult for investors in our common stock to sell shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them. This could cause our stock price to decline.
We Depend On the Services of Our Chief Executive Officer
Our success largely depends on the efforts and abilities of Robert M. Carmichael, our President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Carmichael has been instrumental in securing our existing financing arrangements. Mr. Carmichael is primarily responsible for the development of our technology and the design of our products. The loss of the services of Mr. Carmichael could materially harm our business because of the cost and time necessary to recruit and train a replacement. Such a loss would also divert management attention away from operational issues. We do not presently maintain a key-man life insurance policy on Mr. Carmichael.
We Require Additional Personnel and Could Fail To Attract or Retain Key Personnel
Our continued growth depends on our ability to attract and retain a Chief Financial Officer, a Chief Operations Officer, and additional skilled associates. We are currently utilizing the services of two professional consultants in the absence of a Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operations Officer. The loss of the services of these consultants prior to our ability to attract and retain a Chief Financial Officer or Chief Operations Officer may have a material adverse effect upon us. Also, there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain our existing personnel or attract additional qualified associates in the future.
26
Our Failure to Obtain Intellectual Property and Enforce Protection Would Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Business
Our success depends in part on our ability, and the ability of our patent and trademark licensors, entities owned and controlled by Robert M. Carmichael, our President and Chief Executive Officer, to obtain and defend our intellectual property, including patent protection for our products and processes, preserve our trade secrets, defend and enforce our rights against infringement and operate without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties, both in the United States and in other countries. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual proprietary rights, existing copyright, trademark and trade secret laws afford only limited protection.
Our industry is characterized by frequent intellectual property litigation based on allegations of infringement of intellectual property rights. Although we are not aware of any intellectual property claims against us, we may be a party to litigation in the future.
We May Be Unable To Manage Growth
Successful implementation of our business strategy requires us to manage our growth. Growth could place an increasing strain on our management and financial resources. If we fail to manage our growth effectively, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed, and our stock price may decline.
Reliance on Vendors and Manufacturers
We deal with suppliers on an order-by order basis and have no long-term purchase contracts or other contractual assurances of continued supply or pricing. In addition, we have no long-term contracts with our manufacturing sources and compete with other companies for production facility capacity. Historically, we have purchased enough inventories of products or their substitutes to satisfy demand. However, unanticipated failure of any manufacturer or supplier to meet our requirements or our inability to build or obtain substitutes could force us to curtail or cease operations.
Dependence on Consumer Spending
The success of the our business depends largely upon a number of factors related to consumer spending, including current and future economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income such as employment, business conditions, tax rates, and interest rates. In times of economic uncertainty, consumers tend to defer expenditures for discretionary items, which affects demand for our products. Any significant deterioration in overall economic conditions that diminishes consumer confidence or discretionary income can reduce our sales and adversely affect our financial results. The impact of weakening consumer credit markets; layoffs; corporate restructurings; higher fuel prices; declines in the value of investments and residential real estate; and increases in federal and state taxation can all negatively affect our results. There can be no assurance that in this type of environment consumer spending will not decline beyond current levels, thereby adversely affecting our growth, net sales and profitability or that our business will not be adversely affected by continuing or future downturns in the economy, boating industry, or dive industry. If declines in consumer spending on recreational marine accessories and dive gear are other than temporary, we could be forced to curtail operations.
Government Regulations May Impact Us
The SCUBA industry is self-regulating; therefore, Brownie’s is not subject to government industry specific regulation. Nevertheless, Brownie’s strives to be a leader in promoting safe diving practices within the industry and is at the forefront of self-regulation through responsible diving practices. Brownie’s is subject to all regulations applicable to “for profit” companies as well as all trade and general commerce governmental regulation. All required federal and state permits, licenses, and bonds to operate its facility have been obtained. There can be no assurance that our operations will not be subject to more restrictive regulations in the future, which could force us to curtail or cease operations.
27
Bad Weather Conditions Could Have an Adverse Effect on Operating Results
Our business is significantly impacted by weather patterns. Unseasonably cool weather, extraordinary amounts of rainfall, or unseasonably rough surf, may decrease boat use and diving, thereby decreasing sales. Accordingly, our results of operations for any prior period may not be indicative of results of any future period.
Investors Should Not Rely On an Investment in Our Stock for the Payment of Cash Dividends
We have not paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the future. Investors should not make an investment in our common stock if they require dividend income. Any return on an investment in our common stock will be as a result of any appreciation, if any, in our stock price.
The Manufacture and Distribution of Recreational Diving Equipment Could Result In Product Liability Claims
We, like any other retailer, distributor and manufacturer of products that are designed for recreational sporting purposes, face an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of our products results in injury. Such claims may include, among other things, that our products are designed and/or manufactured improperly or fail to include adequate instructions as to proper use and/or side effects, if any. We do not anticipate obtaining contractual indemnification from parties-supplying raw materials, manufacturing our products or marketing our products. In any event, any such indemnification if obtained will be limited by our terms and, as a practical matter, to the creditworthiness of the indemnifying party. In the event that we do not have adequate insurance or contractual indemnification, product liabilities relating to defective products could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial conditions, which could force us to curtail or cease our business operations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market risk generally represents the risk of loss that may be expected to result from the potential change in value of a financial instrument as a result of fluctuations in credit ratings of the issuer, equity prices, interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments for any purpose.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management carried out an evaluation with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer who serves as our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, required by Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act.
Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and principal financial and accounting officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective such that the information relating to our company required to be disclosed in our SEC reports (i) is recorded processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as described in more detail below. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected.
28
The specific weakness identified by our management was a lack of a timely review by corporate management. The weakness is principally due to lack of working capital to retain the legal, accounting and external audit services, which are integral to the Company’s process for timely disclosure and financial reporting. This deficiency resulted in failure to timely file a Form 8-K relating to a convertible debenture agreement executed in the second quarter of 2011. The convertible debenture transaction is discussed below in Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds, and is disclosed in the notes to the Company’s Financial Statements for the period covered by this report included herein.
To mitigate the chance for reoccurrence of this noted deficiency, as disclosed in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of this 10-Q Report, the company is currently in the process of addressing its working capital shortfall whereby this would provide the needed funds to retain the legal, accounting, and external audit services required for timely disclosure and financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On June 23, 2011, a claim was filed in the U.S. District Court of Dallas County, Texas by the Estate of Christopher Logan. Amount of damages sought were not provided in the claim. The claim lists eight defendants of which the Company is one. The claim asserts Mr. Logan died breathing carbon monoxide while diving with a T80G medium duty compressor (“T80G”). The claim’s cites belief by the plaintiff that the T80G was sold by Brownie’s based on representations made by Keene Engineering, Inc. also a manufacturer of dive compressors and also listed as a defendant. We believe this representation is erroneous because Brownie’s does not sell the make/model cited in the claim, and Brownie’s compressors have the brand name forged into the die-casting on the head of each cylinder. Therefore, Brownie’s believes this claim is without merit, and anticipates being dismissed from the lawsuit.
Item 1a. Risk Factors
Not Applicable to Smaller Reporting Company.
During the period covered by this report, the Company sold securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) in reliance upon the exemption provided in Section 4(2) as described below or as otherwise previously disclosed on Form 8-K. The securities were issued with a legend restricting their transferability absent registration of applicable exemption.
On May 3, 2011, the Company borrowed $300,000 in exchange for a convertible debenture maturing on May 5, 2012. The Debenture bears 10% interest per annum. The lender may at any time convert any portion of the debenture to common shares at a 30% discount of the “Market Price” of the stock based on the average of the previous ten (10) days weighted average closing prices on the date prior to the notice of conversion. The Company may prepay the debenture plus accrued interest at any time before maturity. In addition, as further inducement for loaning the Company the funds, the Company granted the lender 300,000 and 600,000 warrants at $.25 and $.35 per share, respectively.
On June 1, 2011, the Company issued 253,334 shares of its restricted common stock to satisfy $38,000 prepayment for inventory.
29
On June 1, 2011, the Company issued 50,000 shares of its restricted common stock in connection with the payment of a short term loan in the principal amount of $500.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued 81,958 shares of restricted common stock to a consultant or his designee pursuant to a consulting agreement for financial services provided. In addition, the Company issued this same consultant 17,733 shares of restricted common stock disclosed as payable at March 31, 2011, under the consulting agreement.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,900,000 shares of its restricted common stock pursuant to the partial conversion of convertible debenture in the principal amount of $20,635 dated October 4, 2010. The shares were issued in satisfaction of $2,900 outstanding under the convertible debentures.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
30
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
Location
|
||
2.2
|
Merger Agreement, dated June 18, 2002 by and among United Companies Corporation, Merger Co., Inc. and Avid Sportswear & Golf Corp.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.02 Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 filed June 24, 2002.
|
||
2.3
|
Articles of Merger of Avid Sportswear & Golf Corp. with and into Merger Co., Inc.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.03 Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 filed June 24, 2002.
|
||
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 filed on November 13, 2009.
|
||
3.4
|
Designation of Series A Preferred Stock
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2011.
|
||
3.5
|
Bylaws
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.04 to the Registration Statement on Form 10-SB.
|
||
5.1
|
2007 Stock Option Plan
|
Incorporated by reference to the appendix to the Company's Definitive Information Statement on Schedule 14C filed July 31, 2007.
|
||
10.1
|
Share Exchange Agreement, dated March 23, 2004 by and among the Company, Trebor Industries, Inc. and Robert Carmichael
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 9, 2004
|
||
10.2
|
Non-Exclusive License Agreement – BC Keel Trademark
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to
Form 10QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 filed August 15, 2005.
|
||
10.3
|
Exclusive License Agreement - Brownie's Third Lung, Brownie's Public Safety, Tankfill, and Related Trademarks and Copyrights
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to
Form 10QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 filed August 15, 2005.
|
||
10.4
|
Non-Exclusive License Agreement - Garment Integrated or Garment Attachable Flotation Aid and/or PFD
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to
Form 10QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 filed August 15, 2005.
|
||
10.5
|
Non-Exclusive License Agreement - SHERPA Trademark and Inflatable Flotation Aid/Signal Device Technology
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to
Form 10QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 filed August 15, 2005.
|
||
10.6
|
Non-Exclusive License Agreement - Tank- Mounted Weight, BC or PFD-Mounted Trim Weight or Trim Weight Holding System
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to
Form 10QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 filed August 15, 2005.
|
||
10.7
|
Exclusive License Agreement – Brownie’s Third Lung and Related Trademarks and Copyright
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to
Form 10KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed April 4, 2007.
|
31
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
Location
|
||
10.8
|
Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Property Between Trebor Industries, Inc. and GKR Associates, Inc. dated February 21, 2007
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to
Form 10KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed April 4, 2007.
|
||
10.9
|
First Mortgage dated February 22, 2007 between Trebor Industries, Inc. and Colonial Bank
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to
Form 10KSB for the year ended year ended December 31, 2006 filed April 4, 2007.
|
||
10.10
|
Note dated February 22, 2007 payable to GKR Associates, Inc.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to
Form 10KSB for the year ended year ended December 31, 2006 filed April 4, 2007.
|
||
10.11
|
Second Mortgage dated February 22, 2007 between Trebor Industries, Inc. and GKR Associates, LLC.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to
Form 10KSB for the year ended year ended December 31, 2006 filed April 4, 2007.
|
||
10.12
|
Promissory Note dated January 1, 2007 payable to Robert M. Carmichael.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to
Form 10KSB for the year ended year ended December 31, 2006 filed April 4, 2007.
|
||
10.13
|
Asset Purchase Agreement between Trebor Industries, Inc. and Robert Carmichael.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2008.
|
||
10.14
|
Asset Purchase Agreement between Trebor Industries, Inc. and Robert Carmichael.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2009.
|
||
10.15
|
Asset Purchase Agreement between Trebor Industries, Inc. and Robert Carmichael.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K filed on January 19, 2010.
|
||
10.16
|
Asset Purchase Agreement between Trebor Industries, Inc. and the Carleigh Rae Corporation
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2011.
|
||
10.17
|
Convertible Promissory Note issued to Asher Enterprise , Inc.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2011.
|
||
10.18
|
Consolidated and Restated Promissory Note issued to BBT.
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2011.
|
||
10.19
|
BBT Forbearance Agreement
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2011.
|
||
31.1
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
|
Provided herewith.
|
||
31.2
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
|
Provided herewith.
|
||
32.1
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 1350
|
Provided herewith.
|
||
32.2
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 1350
|
Provided herewith
|
||
101 | XBRL Interactive Data File** |
Provided herewith
|
** Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following financial statements from the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) related notes to these financial statements tagged as blocks of text. The XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed "filed" or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of those sections.
32
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc.
|
|||
Date: August 15, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert M. Carmichael | |
Robert M. Carmichael
|
|||
President, Chief Executive Officer,
|
|||
Chief Financial Officer/
Principal Accounting Officer
|
33