Brownie's Marine Group, Inc - Quarter Report: 2018 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

or

Commission file number 333-99393

Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(954) 462-5570

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code

Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [  ] No [  ]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

There were 104,625,851 shares of common stock outstanding at August 20, 2018.

PART I

Item 1. Financial Statements

BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

BOWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BROWNIE’S MARINE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

JUNE 30, 2018

(Unaudited)

Description of business –Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as the “Company,” “our” or “BWMG”) designs, tests, manufactures and distributes recreational hookah diving, yacht based scuba air compressor and nitrox generation systems, scuba and water safety products through its wholly owned subsidiary Trebor Industries, Inc. and manufactures and sells high pressure air and industrial gas compressor packages through its wholly owned subsidiary Brownie’s High Pressure Compressor Services, Inc. The Company sells its products both on a wholesale and retail basis, and does so from its headquarters and manufacturing facility in Pompano Beach, Florida. The Company does business as (dba) Brownie’s Third Lung, the dba name of Trebor Industries, Inc. and Brownie’s High Pressure Compressor Services, Inc. The Company’s common stock is quoted on the OTC Markets (Pink) under the symbol “BWMG”.

On August 7, 2017, Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc. entered into an Exclusive Distribution Agreement with Lenhardt & Wagner GmbH (“L&W”), a German-based company engaged in the development, manufacturing and sales of high pressure air and industrial gas compressor packages. Under the terms of the Exclusive Distribution Agreement, we were appointed the exclusive distributor of L&W’s complete product line in North America and South America, including the Caribbean (the “Territory”). Pursuant to an intercompany assignment, Brownie’s High Pressure Compressor Services, Inc., our newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary (“BHP”), is party to the agreement. Through BHP we expect to conduct business and build the brand name “L&W Americas/LWA”, establishing sales, distribution and service centers for high pressure air and industrial gas systems in the dive, fire, CNG, military, scientific, recreational and aerospace industries. Our goal will be to build a network of jobbers, dealers, installers and high-pressure compressor distributors throughout the Territory by leveraging our know-how, brand awareness, complimentary products and creating sustainable distribution and core product OEM integration relationships.

In December 2017, the Company formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary bLU3, Inc. The Company was formed to develop and market an innovation electric shallow dive system that is completely portable to the user. As of June 30, 2018, there were as yet no operations, other than related research expenditures, in the new company.

Basis of Presentation – The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Security and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In the opinion of management all normal recurring adjustments considered necessary to give a fair presentation of operating results for the periods presented have been included. The condensed consolidated results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017 has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. While management of the Company believes that the disclosures presented are adequate to make the information not misleading, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and the footnotes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Company’s Form 10-K which was filed on April 17, 2018.

Definition of fiscal year – The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.

Principles of Consolidation –The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BWMG and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Trebor Industries, Inc., Brownie’s High Pressure Compressor Services, Inc. and bLU3, Inc. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications – Certain reclassifications may have been made to the 2017 financial statement amounts and disclosures to conform to the 2018 financial statement presentation.

Cash and equivalents – Only highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less are classified as cash and equivalents. These investments are stated at cost, which approximates market value.

Going Concern – The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for the twelve-month period following the date of these financial statements. The Company incurred a loss of $248,744 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and losses of $109,203 and $327,143 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018. The Company had an accumulated deficit of $9,206,936 and $8,879,793 at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Because the Company believes that existing operational cash flow may not be sufficient to fund presently anticipated operations, this raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Therefore, the Company will continue to raise additional funds as needed and is currently exploring alternative sources of financing. The Company has issued common stock and convertible debentures as an interim measure to finance working capital needs and may continue to raise additional capital through sale of restricted common stock or other securities or obtaining short term loans.

If the Company fails to raise additional funds when needed, or does not have sufficient cash flows from sales, it may be required to scale back or cease operations, liquidate assets and possibly seek bankruptcy protection. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

Accounts receivable – Accounts receivable consist of amounts due from the sale of all of our products to wholesale and retail customers. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on historical customer experience and industry knowledge. The allowance for doubtful accounts totaled $9,200 and $16,848 at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Inventory – Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is principally determined by using the average cost method that approximates the First-In, First-Out (FIFO) method of accounting for inventory. Inventory consists of raw materials as well as finished goods held for sale. The Company’s management monitors the inventory for excess and obsolete items and makes necessary valuation adjustments when indicated.

Property, equipment and leasehold improvements – Property, equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation or amortization. Depreciation and amortization is provided principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or term of the lease, which are primarily 3 to 5 years. The cost of repairs and maintenance is charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for property betterments and renewals are capitalized. Upon sale or other disposition of a depreciable asset, cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in other income (expense).

The Company periodically evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful lives of fixed assets or whether the remaining balance of fixed assets should be evaluated for possible impairment. The Company uses an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of the fixed assets in measuring their recoverability.

Revenue recognition – Revenues from product sales are recognized when the Company’s products are shipped or when service is rendered. Revenues from fixed-price contracts are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method, when applicable, measured by the percentage of cost incurred to date to estimated total cost of each contract. This method is used because management considers the percentage of cost incurred to date to estimated total cost to be the best available measure of progress on the contracts. As of June 30, 2018 and 2017, there were no ongoing contracts being accounted for using the percentage of completion method.

Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs, and depreciation costs. General and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Change in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Revenue and costs incurred for time and material projects are recognized as the work is performed.

Product development costs – Product development expenditures are charged to expenses as incurred.

Advertising and marketing costs – The Company expenses the costs of producing advertisements and marketing material at the time production occurs, and expenses the costs of communicating advertisements and participating in trade shows in the period in which occur. Advertising and trade show expense incurred for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, totaled $12,714 and $11,970, respectively. Advertising and trade show expense incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, totaled $28,963 and $13,127, respectively.

Research and development costs – The Company accounts for research and development costs in accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 730-10, Research and Development (“ASC 730-10”). Under ASC 730-10, all research and development costs must be charged to expense as incurred. Accordingly, internal research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Third-party research and developments costs are expensed when the contracted work has been performed or as milestone results have been achieved. Company-sponsored research and development costs related to both present and future products are expensed in the period incurred. During the three month periods ending June 30, 2018 and 2017 the Company incurred research and development costs of $36,744 and $642, respectively. During the six month periods ending June 30, 2018 and 2017 the Company incurred research and development costs of $43,176 and $1,205, respectively.

Customer deposits and returns policy – The Company typically takes a minimum 50% deposit against custom and large tankfill systems prior to ordering and/or building the systems. The remaining balance due is payable upon delivery, shipment, or installation of the system. There is no provision for cancellation of custom orders once the deposit is accepted, nor return of the custom ordered product. Additionally, returns of all other merchandise are subject to a 15% restocking fee as stated on each sales invoice. The Company provides our customers with an industry standard one year warranty on systems sold. Historically, the cost of our warranty policy has been immaterial and no reserve has been established. Customer deposits and unearned revenue totaled $70,664 and $97,249 at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Income taxes - On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Jobs Act”) was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a United States corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017.

Management is in the process of reviewing the Jobs Act, but has not completed its analysis at the statement date.

The Company accounts for its income taxes under the assets and liabilities method, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent the Company believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets that do not meet the criteria for recognition. In the event the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, they would make an adjustment to the valuation allowance which would reduce the provision for income taxes.

The Company follows the accounting guidance which provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized initially and in subsequent periods. Also included is guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

Comprehensive income – The Company has no components of other comprehensive income. Accordingly, net income equals comprehensive income for all periods presented.

Stock-based compensation – The Company accounts for all compensation related to stock, options or warrants using a fair value based method whereby compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. The Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation model to calculate the fair value of options and warrants issued to both employees and non-employees. Stock issued for compensation is valued on the effective date of the agreement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which includes determination of the fair value of the share-based transaction. The fair value is determined through use of the quoted stock price.

Beneficial conversion features on convertible debentures – A beneficial conversion feature arises when the conversion price of a convertible instrument is below the per share value of the underlying stock into which it is convertible. The fair value of the stock upon which to base the beneficial conversion feature (BCF) computation has been determined through use of the quoted stock price.

Fair value of financial instruments – Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. An entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

Inputs are used in applying the various valuation techniques and broadly refer to the assumptions that market participants use to make valuation decisions, including assumptions about risk. An investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by the Company. Management considers observable data to be market data which is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, not proprietary, provided by multiple, independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. The categorization of an investment within the hierarchy is based upon the pricing transparency of the investment and does not necessarily correspond to the Company’s perceived risk of that investment.

At June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, the carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable, accounts receivable – related parties, customer deposits and unearned revenue, royalties payable – related parties, other liabilities, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Earnings per common share – Basic earnings per share exclude any dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. Basic earnings per share are computed using the weighted-average number of outstanding common shares during the applicable period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common and dilutive and common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common stock equivalent shares are excluded from the computation if their effect is antidilutive. Potentially dilutive shares excluded from dilutive earnings per share totaled 62,164,296 and 50,807,948 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively as the effect was anti-dilutive.

New accounting pronouncements

In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, “Income Taxes” (Topic 740) amending previous guidance on accounting and disclosures for income taxes addressing changes under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”). This standard addresses the recognition of taxes payable or refundable in the current year and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets following passage of the Act. We do not believe this ASU will have an impact on our results of operation, cash flows or financial condition.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU 2016 provides guidance regarding the classification of certain items within the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 became effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASC 2016-15 did not have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016–10 Revenue from Contract with Customers (Topic 606): identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The amendments in this Update do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. Rather, the amendments in this Update clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. Topic 606 includes implementation guidance on (a) contracts with customers to transfer goods and services in exchange for consideration and (b) determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied at a point in time) or a right to access the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied over time). The amendments in this Update are intended to render more detailed implementation guidance with the expectation to reduce the degree of judgement necessary to comply with Topic 606. The adoption of ASU 2016-10 became effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of ASC 2016-15 did not have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which will amend current lease accounting to require lessees to recognize (i) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis, and (ii) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02 does not significantly change lease accounting requirements applicable to lessors; however, certain changes were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model. This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU to determine if there will be any impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330), Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. ASU No. 2015-11 does not apply to inventory measurement using the last-in, last-out (LIFO) or retail methods. ASU No. 2015-11 applies to all other inventory measurement methods, which includes first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost. Previously, inventory valuation was at the lower of cost or fair market value. This ASU changes the valuation to lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of the business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2015-11 should be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted. The Company opted for early adoption of ASU 2015-11 with no impact to financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company updated its consolidated financial statements to reflect inventory valuation at the lower of cost or net realizable value.

The Company believes there was no other new accounting guidance adopted, but not yet effective that either has not already been disclosed in prior reporting periods or is relevant to the readers of our financial statements.

Inventory consists of the following as of:

Property and equipment consists of the following as of:

Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $4,103 and $8,656 for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2018, and $9,041 and $17,842 for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2017, respectively.

Other assets at June 30, 2018 consisted of the non-current portion of a licensing fee of $22,500 and $6,649 in refundable deposits. At December 31, 2017, the balance of $6,649 consisted solely of refundable deposits.

In April, 2018, the Company entered into an exclusive Patent License Agreement (“License Agreement”) relating to intellectual property to be utilized in underwater breathing systems supplying breathing air to divers at low pressure.

Under the License Agreement, the Company paid an initial license fee through the issuance of 759,422 common shares with a fair value of $30,000. The License Agreement further provides for royalties to be paid based on annual net revenues achieved utilizing the contracted technology.

As the Company’s product intended to utilize the contracted technology is still in the development stage and no sales are anticipated at least through calendar 2018, no contingent liability has been recognized.

The Company sells to three (3) entities owned by the brother of Robert Carmichael, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and three (3) companies owned by the Chief Executive Officer as further discussed in Note 7 - RELATED PARTIES TRANSACTIONS. Combined sales to these six (6) entities for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, represented 20.10% and 41.88% respectively, of total net revenues. Combined sales to these six (6) entities for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, represented 24.61% and 38.85% respectively, of total net revenues.

Net revenues and accounts receivable – related parties – The Company sells products to Brownie’s Southport Divers, Inc., Brownie’s Palm Beach Divers, and Brownie’s Yacht Toys, owned by the brother of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Terms of sale are no more favorable than those extended to any of the Company’s other customers with similar sales volume. Combined net revenues from these entities for three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, was $138,581 and $206,963, respectively. Combined net revenues from these entities for six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, was $296,413 and $365,386, respectively. Accounts receivable from Brownie’s Southport Diver’s, Inc., Brownie’s Palm Beach Divers, and Brownie’s Yacht Toys totaled $60,212 at June 30, 2018 and $51,638 at December 31, 2017, respectively.

The Company sells products to Brownie’s Global Logistics, LLC. (“BGL”), 940 Associates, Inc. and 3D Buoy, LLC affiliated with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Terms of sale are more favorable than those extended to BWMG’s regular customers, but these terms are no more favorable than those extended to Brownie’s strategic partners. Terms of sale to BGL approximate cost or include a nominal margin. These terms are consistent with those extended to Brownie’s strategic partners. Strategic partner terms on a per order basis include promotion of BWMG’s technologies and “Brownie’s” brand, offered only on product or services not offered for resale, and must provide for reciprocal terms or arrangements to BWMG on strategic partners’ product or services. BGL is fulfilling the strategic partner terms by providing exposure for BWMG’s technologies and “Brownie’s” brand in the yachting and exploration community world-wide through its operations. Combined net revenues from these entities for three month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, were $0 and $2,732, respectively. Combined net revenues from these entities for six month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, were $0 and $3,067, respectively. Combined accounts receivable from BGL, 940 Associates and 3D Buoy totaled $1,966 and $4,043 at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Royalties expense – related parties – The Company has an Exclusive License Agreement with 940 Associates, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “940A”), an entity owned by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, to license the trademark “Brownies Third Lung”, “Tankfill”, “Brownies Public Safety” and various other related trademarks as listed in the agreement. This license agreement calls for the Company to pay 940A 2.5% of gross revenues per quarter. Total royalty expense for the above agreements for the three months and ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, totaled $13,468 and $18,613, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 totaled $23,395 and $29,486, respectively.

In November 2016, the Company entered into a conversion agreement under which the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of restricted common stock in satisfaction of $88,850 past due and payable to 940A. As of the date of the conversion agreement, the Company was more than 31 months in arrears on its royalty payments totaling approximately $151,000. In addition, 940A has agreed to forebear on any default under the License Agreement due to the Company’s remaining past due amount for a period of three months from the effective date of the conversion agreement. The shares issued were valued at $0.008885 per share, the closing price of the stock on the effective date of the conversion agreement. No default notice had been received prior to the conversion agreement.

On March 1, 2017, the Company and 940A entered into an additional conversion agreement. Under the agreement the Company issued 940A 4,587,190 shares of restricted common stock in satisfaction of $63,303, which represented all past due and payable amounts to 940A under the Exclusive License Agreement as of March 1, 2017. As of the date of the agreement the Company was more than 3 months in arrears on royalty payments due under the Exclusive License Agreement. The shares were issued at a price per share of $0.0138, which exceeded the closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported on the OTC Markets on the date immediately preceding the closing. No default notice had been received prior to the conversion agreements.

Stock options outstanding from patent purchase – Effective March 3, 2009, the Company entered into a Patent Purchase Agreement with Robert M. Carmichael, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Company purchased several patents it had previously been paying royalties on and several related unissued patents. In exchange for the Intellectual Property, the Company issued Mr. Carmichael 234 stock options at a $1,350 exercise price expiring ten years from the effective date of grant, or March 2, 2019. None of the options have been exercised to-date.

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consists of the following as of:

Balances due certain vendors are in arrears to varying degrees. The Company is handling all delinquent accounts on a case-by-case basis.

Other liabilities consist of the following as of:

(*) Initial balance of $200,000 non-convertible note dated July 7, 2013. The note carries a 0% interest rate and is due on demand.

Convertible debentures consist of the following at June 30, 2018:

Convertible debentures consist of the following at December 31, 2017:

Reference numbers in right hand column of table entitled Ref. refer to paragraphs with corresponding numbers that immediately follow this paragraph.

From time to time the Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, including matters relating to product liability claims. Such product liability claims sometimes involving wrongful death or injury have historically been covered by product liability insurance, which provided coverage for each claim up to $1,000,000. During the third quarter of 2014, the Company did not renew its product liability insurance since the renewal policy amount was cost prohibitive. As of August 15, 2017, the Company has obtained Product Liability Insurance, although prior claims are not covered under the new policy. The initial term of the policy was through August 14, 2018 and was renewed through August 14, 2019.

As previously disclosed, the Company, Trebor and other third parties, are each named as a co-defendants under an action filed in March 2015 in the Circuit Court of Broward County under Case No. CACE15-03238 by the Estate of Ernesto Rodriguez, claiming wrongful death and products liability resulting in the decedent’s drowning death while using a Brownie’s Third Lung product. This claim falls outside the Company’s period of insurance coverage. Plaintiff has claimed damages exceeding $1,000,000. A default judgment was entered against Trebor in 2015 due to its failure to timely respond to the complaint. The Company has obtained different legal representation in this matter and attempted to have the default set aside. On November 2, 2016, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for sanctions against our company for frivolous litigation relating to our attempt to have the matter dismissed and granted the plaintiff’s motion to strike our motion for summary judgment due to our initial default. The Company believes the claim to be a Workers Compensation claim relating exclusively against other non-affiliated defendants and without merit, and will aggressively defend this action and appeal the default judgment. In the event Trebor is unable to overturn the default judgment and the defendants are determined to be at fault, we would seek to allocate damages among all of the other parties, including the plaintiff. At this time, the amount of any loss, or range of loss, cannot be reasonably estimated due to the undetermined validity of any claim or claims made by plaintiff and the mitigating factors among the parties. Therefore, the Company has not recorded reserves and contingent liabilities related to this matter. However, in the future, as the case progresses, the Company may be required to record a contingent liability or reserve for these matters.

On August 14, 2014, the Company entered into a new lease commitment. Terms of the new lease include thirty-seven-month term commencing on September 1, 2014; payment of $5,367 security deposit; base rent of approximately $4,000 per month over the term of the lease plus sales tax; and payment of 10.76% of annual operating expenses (i.e. common areas maintenance), which is approximately $2,000 per month subject to periodic adjustment. On December 1, 2016, we entered into an amendment to the initial lease agreement, commencing on October 1, 2017, extending the term for an additional eighty-four months, expiring September 30, 2024. The base rent was increased to $4,626 per month with a 3% annual escalation throughout the amended term. We believe that the facilities are suitable for their intended purpose, are being efficiently utilized and provide adequate capacity to meet demand for the foreseeable future.

Base rent expense, attributable to the Company’s headquarters facility totaled approximately $13,878 and $23,000 for the three month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and $27,756 and $35,000 for the six month periods ending June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The following is an estimate of future minimum rental payments required under our lease agreement on August 14, 2014 and as amended December 1, 2016:

On August 7, 2017 the Company entered into an Exclusive Distribution Agreement with Lenhardt & Wagner GmbH (“L&W”), a German-based company engaged in the development, manufacturing and sales of high pressure air and industrial gas compressor packages. Under the terms of the Exclusive Distribution Agreement, we were appointed the exclusive distributor of L&W’s complete product line in North America and South America, including the Caribbean (the “Territory”). Pursuant to an intercompany assignment, Brownie’s High Pressure Compressor Services, Inc., our newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary (“BHP”), is party to the agreement. Through BHP we expect to conduct business and build the brand name “L&W Americas/LWA”, establishing sales, distribution and service centers for high pressure air and industrial gas systems in the dive, fire, CNG, military, scientific, recreational and aerospace industries. Under the terms of the agreement, we were granted a non-exclusive, non-transferrable and irrevocable right to use certain of L&W’s trademarks in connection with the marketing, use, sale and service of the products in the Territory. The agreement is for an initial term of five years, and will automatically renew for one additional five year term unless terminated by either party upon one year written notice prior to the expiration of the then current term. Either party may terminate the agreement without cause upon one year prior written notice to the other party. In addition, L&W may terminate the agreement for cause upon 120 days prior notice to us, subject to certain cure periods.

Common Stock

The Company had 103,903,691 and 98,192,717 common shares outstanding at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

On January 6, 2018, the Company issued 217,391 Units consisting of 869,565 common shares and 217,391 common stock purchase warrants exercisable at $0.0115 per share. The warrants are exercisable at any time for a period of two years from date of issuance.

In January 2018, the Company issued 2,000,000 common shares to Mr. Dana Allan for his services for serving on our board of directors. The grant date fair value of the shares issued was $25,000.

On February 2, 2018, the Company issued 434,783 Units consisting of 1,739,130 common shares and 434,783 common stock purchase warrants exercisable at $0.0115 per share. The warrants are exercisable at any time for a period of two years from date of issuance.

On April 4, 2018, the Company issued 142,857 common stock shares to an employee of the Company with a value of $0.0125 per share totaling $1,786 which was charged to stock based compensation.

On April 6, 2018, the Company entered into a Patent and License Agreement issuing 759,422 common shares with a fair value of $0.0395 per share totaling $30,000.

In May 2018, the Company issued 200,000 common shares to two consultants with a value of $0.03 per share totaling $6,000 which was charged to consulting fees expense.

Preferred Stock

During the second quarter of 2010, the holder of the majority of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock approved an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorizing the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The preferred stock as authorized has such voting powers, designations, preferences, limitations, restrictions and relative rights as may be determined by our Board of Directors of the Company from time to time in accordance with the provisions of the Florida Business Corporation Act. Before modification, the existing Articles of Incorporation did not authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock. The Company authorized the preferred stock for the purpose of added flexibility in seeking capital and potential acquisition targets. The amendment authorizing the issuance of shares of preferred stock grants the Board authority, without further action by our stockholders, to designate and issue preferred stock in one or more series and to designate certain rights, preferences and restrictions of each series, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of the common stock. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the 425,000 shares of preferred stock are owned by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The preferred shares have 250 to 1 voting rights over the common stock, and are convertible into 31,481 shares of common stock. The preferred stock votes with the Company’s common stock, except as otherwise required under Florida law.

Equity Incentive Plan

On August 22, 2007, the Company adopted an Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). Under the Plan, Stock Options may be granted to Employees, Directors, and Consultants in the form of Incentive Stock Options or Nonstatutory Stock Options. In addition, Stock Purchase Rights, time vested and/performance invested Restricted Stock, and Stock Appreciation Rights and Unrestricted Shares may also be granted under the Plan. The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan shall be 297 shares, and no more than 75 Shares of Common Stock may be granted to any one Participant with respect to Options, Stock Purchase Rights and Stock Appreciation Rights during any one calendar year period. Common Stock to be issued under the Plan may be either authorized and unissued or shares held in treasury by the Company. The term of the Plan shall be ten years. The Plan expired on August 22, 2017. All 297 options issued under the Plan remain outstanding.

13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In July 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 722,160 shares of common stock to sixteen employees under a one-time employee stock incentive grant. The shares were fair valued at $0.022 per share based on market value at the time of the grant, with a total value recognized of $16,000.

Introductory Statements

Information included or incorporated by reference in this filing may contain forward-looking statements. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology.

Overview

Brownie’s Marine Group, Inc., a Florida corporation (referred to herein as “the Company”, “we”, or “BWMG”), designs, tests, manufactures and distributes recreational diving, yacht based scuba air compressor and nitrox generations systems, and water safety products through its wholly owned subsidiary, Trebor Industries, Inc., d/b/a Brownie’s Third Lung, a Florida corporation. The Company sells its products both on a wholesale and retail basis, and does so from its headquarters and manufacturing facility located in Pompano Beach, Florida. In August 2017, the Company organized Brownie’s High Pressure Compressor Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary (“BHP”). Through BHP we are party to an Exclusive Distribution Agreement with Lenhardt & Wagner GmbH (“L&W”), a German-based company engaged in the development, manufacturing and sales of high pressure air and industrial gas compressor packages. Through this agreement we intend to establish sales, distribution and service centers for high pressure air and industrial gas systems in the dive, fire, CNG, military, scientific, recreational and aerospace industries. The Company’s common stock is quoted on the OTC Markets (Pink) under the symbol “BWMG”.

In December 2017, the Company formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary bLU3, Inc. The Company was formed to develop and market an innovative electric shallow dive system that is completely portable to the user. As of June 30, 2018 there were as yet no operations, other than research expenditures, in the new company.

The Company’s common stock is quoted on the OTC Markets (Pink) under the symbol “BWMG”. The Company’s website is www.Browniesmarinegroup.com. Information on the website is not a part of this report.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018, as Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017

Net revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2018, we had net revenues of $650,318, a 32% increase over the second quarter 2017. The bulk of this increase was attributable to sales in our BHP subsidiary formed in August 2017. This subsidiary was formed to commercialize our exclusive distribution agreement with L&W. Under this agreement, the Company has exclusive distribution rights for North America, South America and the Caribbean. While there can be no assurance, the Company expects revenues to increase in the future. Related party revenues declined by approximately 33% between periods as a result of a decrease in demand of our recreational dive products, primarily attributable to exceptionally heavy rain conditions in the United States] in April and May of 2018.

In December 2017, the Company formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary, bLU3, Inc. The Company was formed to develop and market an innovative electric shallow dive system that is completely portable to the user. As of June 30, 2018, there were as yet no revenues recognized in the new company as we are in the development stage, however, the Company has been incurring engineering and development costs. In connection with this project, in April 2018, the Company entered into a Patent License Agreement contracting for certain intellectual property rights which we believe will enhance the capabilities of our portable shallow dive system currently under development.

Cost of net revenues. Cost of net revenues increased during the second quarter 2018 to $458,732, a 26% increase over the second quarter 2017. This increase was due in large part to the 32% increase in revenues. The cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues remained relatively constant, totaling 71% during the second quarter 2018 compared to 73% for the same period 2017. Due to the nature of a large portion of our business being dependent on recreational boating and diving, sales are seasonal and often dependent on weather conditions. However, while there can be no assurance, given the formation of BHP in the third quarter 2017, the Company believes that as our operations under the L&W agreement target industrial applications, we will be less susceptible to weather or other seasonal fluctuations.

Operating expenses. Operating expenses, consisting of selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development costs increased sharply between the periods. Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $248,600 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, an increase of $69,567 or 39% over the prior year. The large bulk of this increase was due to an increase in the number of employees between the periods with an associated increase in salaries and benefits. Employees were added in large part due to the formation of BHP including two sales managers, two engineers, a director of marketing and an additional sales person.

While there can be no assurance, the Company believes that the near term costs of “ramping up” its high pressure business, through LWA, will increase revenues in the future.

Research and development costs were up sharply, increasing to $36,744 during the second quarter 2018, compared to $642 incurred in the second quarter 2017. This increase is attributable to our efforts to expand our product lines including our portable shallow dive system currently under development. We expect research and development costs to continue to increase as we continue development of products aimed at increasing what we believe to be innovative product offerings.

Other expense, net. Other expense, consisting primarily of interest expense, increased for the second quarter 2018 by $7,993. This increase was attributable to an increase in the amortization of beneficial conversion features totaling $6,250 on two notes issued in the fourth quarter 2017 and related interest recognized on these notes.

Net loss. For the three months ended June 30, 2018, we recognized a net loss of $109,203 as compared to a net loss of $55,648 for the three months ended June 30, 2017. This increase in the net loss was primarily attributable to the increase in general and administrative expenses and research and development costs attributable to increased staffing and related costs and new product development efforts as discussed above.

Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018, as Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

Net revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, we had net revenues of $1,164,933, a 24% increase over the first half 2017. The bulk of this increase was attributable to sales in our BHP subsidiary formed in August 2017. This subsidiary was formed to commercialize our exclusive distribution agreement with L&W. Under this agreement, the Company has exclusive distribution rights for North America, South America and the Caribbean. While there can be no assurance, the Company expects revenues to increase in the future. Related party revenues declined by approximately 19% between periods as a result of a decrease in demand in recreational dive products primarily attributable to exceptionally heavy rain conditions in April and May of 2018, discussed above.

In December 2017, the Company formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary, bLU3, Inc. The Company was formed to develop and market an innovative electric shallow dive system that is completely portable to the user. As of June 30, 2018, there were as yet no revenues recognized in the new company as we are in the development stage, however, the Company has been incurring engineering and development costs. In connection with this project, in April 2018, the Company entered into a patent license agreement contracting for certain intellectual property rights which we believe will enhance the capabilities of our portable shallow dive system currently under development.

Under the License Agreement, the Company paid an initial license fee through the issuance of 759,422 common shares with a fair value of $30,000. The License Agreement further provides for royalties to be paid based on annual net revenues achieved utilizing the contracted technology.

As the Company’s product intended to utilize the contracted technology is still in the development stage and no sales are anticipated at least through calendar 2018, no contingent liability has been recognized.

Cost of net revenues. Cost of net revenues increased during the six months ended June 30, 2018 to $913,378, a 49% increase over the first half 2017. This increase was due in large part to the 24% increase in revenues during 2018 The cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues totaled 78% during the first half of 2018 compared to 65% for the same period 2017. This increase in cost of sales as a percentage of total net sales was due in part to a change in product mix, particularly to related parties, related to weather conditions in the second quarter of 2018 affecting sales. Due to the nature of a large portion of our business being dependent on recreational boating and diving, sales are seasonal and often dependent on weather conditions. However, while there can be no assurance, given the formation BHP in the third quarter 2017, the Company believes that as our operations under the L&W agreement target industrial applications, we will be less susceptible to weather or other seasonal fluctuations.

Operating expenses. Operating expenses, consisting of selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development costs increased sharply between the periods. Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $503,709 for the six months ended June 30, 2018, an increase of $173,342 or 52% over the prior year. The large bulk of this increase was due to an increase in the number of employees between the periods with an associated increase in salaries and benefits which accounted for the bulk of the increase. Employees were added in large part due to the formation of BHP including two sales managers, two engineers, a director of marketing and an additional sales person.

While there can be no assurance, the Company believes that the near term costs of “ramping up” its high pressure business, through LWA, will increase revenues in the future.

Research and development costs were up sharply, increasing to $43,176 during the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to $1,205 incurred in the first half of 2017. This increase is attributable our efforts to expand our product lines including our portable shallow dive system currently under development. We expect research and development costs to continue to increase as we continue development of products aimed at increasing what we believe to be new innovative product offerings.

Other expense, net. Other expense, consisting primarily of interest expense, increased for the first half of 2018 by $17,630. This increase was attributable to an increase in the amortization of beneficial conversion features totaling $19,313 on two notes issued in the fourth quarter 2017 and related interest recognized on these notes being off-set by $1,207 in other income in 2017.

Net loss. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, we recognized a net loss of $327,143 as compared to a net loss of $18,057 for comparable period in 2017. This increase in the net loss was primarily attributable to the increase in the cost of revenues as a percentage of net revenues from 65% to 78% as described above as well as a sharp increase in general and administrative expenses and research and development costs attributable to increased staffing and related costs and new product development efforts as discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had current assets (primarily consisting of inventory and prepaid expenses) of $1,285,546 and current liabilities of $1,021,550 or a current ratio of 1.3 to 1, representing a working capital balance of $263,996. At June 30, 2018 the Company had current assets of $1,261,237 and current liabilities of $1,270,722, or a current ratio of approximately 1 to 1 with a working capital deficit of $9,485.

The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for the twelve-month period following the date of these financial statements. We incurred a loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $248,744 and losses of $109,2035 and $327,143, respectively for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2018. The Company had an accumulated deficit as of June 30, 2018 of $9,206,936.

Because the Company believes that existing operational cash flow may not be sufficient to fund presently anticipated operations, this raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Therefore, the Company will continue to raise additional funds as needed and is currently exploring alternative sources of financing. The Company has issued common stock and convertible debentures as an interim measure to finance working capital needs and may continue to raise additional capital through sale of restricted common stock or other securities or obtaining short term loans.

If the Company fails to raise additional funds when needed, or does not have sufficient cash flows from sales, it may be required to scale back or cease operations, liquidate assets and possibly seek bankruptcy protection. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

Net cash used in operating activities totaled $108,900 for the six months ended June 30, 2018. The cash used in operations was primarily the result of a net loss from operations of $327,143, coupled with an increase in inventory levels of $202,987 attributable to our newly formed subsidiary BHP and increased inventory levels associated with the commencement of their operations. These uses of cash were offset by a reduction in prepaid expenses of $178,866 and an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $255,493. As with the increase in inventory levels, the increase accounts payable reflect the “ramping up” of LWA’s operations which commenced in December 2017.

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $30,000 at June 30, 2018. During the first quarter 2018, the Company sold 652,174 Units consisting of 2,608,695 common shares and 652,174 common stock purchase warrants, exercisable at $0.0115 per share, for $30,000. There was no similar transaction during the first half 2017.

Certain Business Risks

The Company is subject to various risks, which may materially harm its business, financial condition and results of operations. These may not be the only risks and uncertainties that the Company faces. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this report before deciding to purchase the Company’s common stock. These are not the only risks and uncertainties that the Company faces. If any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs, the Company’s business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed. In that case, the trading price of the Company’s common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is in substantial doubt absent obtaining adequate new debt or equity financing and achieving sufficient sales levels.

The Company recorded a loss for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and year ended December 31, 2017 of $327,143 and $248,744, respectively and had an accumulated deficit of $9,206,936 at June 30, 2018. The Company is behind on payments due for matured convertible debentures, notes payable, and certain vendor payables. The Company is working out all matters of delinquency on a case by case basis. However, there can be no assurance that cooperation the Company has received thus far will continue. Our continued existence is dependent upon generating working capital and obtaining adequate new debt or equity financing. Because of our historical losses, we may not have working capital to permit us to remain in business through the end of the year, without improvements in our cash flow from operations or new financing. Working capital limitations continue to impinge on our day-to-day operations.

The optional conversion features of a series of convertible debentures issued by the Company, the majority of which are past due, could require the Company to issue a substantial number of shares of common stock, which will cause dilution to the Company’s stockholders and a potentially negative effect on our stock price.

During 2011 and 2012, the Company issued convertible debentures to several lenders and other third parties which remain outstanding and are past due. We do not have sufficient cash to satisfy the notes. In December 2017, the Company issued an additional two secured convertible debentures for $50,000 each. At June 30, 2018 the outstanding principal balance of these debentures, net of related unamortized debt discount, plus accrued interest, was $621,469. The debentures convert under various conversion formulas, which may be at a significant discount to market price of our common stock. The conversion of any of the debentures will result in the issuance of a significant number of shares of our common stock which will cause dilution to our existing shareholders. Furthermore, the conversion at a significant discount to the market price of our common stock may have a negative effect on our stock price.

In December 2017 we secured convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000 outstanding which mature in December 2018, unless extended at the discretion of the lenders, and we may not have available capital to satisfy such notes when they become due.

The secured notes are collateralized by all of our assets and guarantees by our operating subsidiaries and chief executive officer. We currently do not have sufficient cash to satisfy the notes when it becomes due and there are no assurances we will be able to raise the funds if necessary. In the event we are unable to satisfy the notes the lenders may foreclose on our assets.

Our company is a voluntary filer with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in the event that we cease reporting under the Exchange Act, investors would have limited information available to them about the company.

While we are subject to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, we do not have a class of securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. To the extent that our duty to file Exchange Act reports has automatically suspended under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as a voluntary filer, we may elect to cease reporting under the Exchange Act at such time, which would limit the information available to investors and shareholders about the company.

The manufacture and distribution of recreational diving equipment could result in product liability claims and we are subject to a claim that is not covered by insurance.

We, like any other retailer, distributor and manufacturer of products that are designed for recreational sporting purposes, face an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of our products results in injury. Such claims may include, among other things, that our products are designed and/or manufactured improperly or fail to include adequate instructions as to proper use and/or side effects, if any. We do not anticipate obtaining contractual indemnification from parties-supplying raw materials, manufacturing our products or marketing our products. In any event, any such indemnification if obtained will be limited by our terms and, as a practical matter, to the credit worthiness of the indemnifying party. While we currently have product liability insurance, we are subject to a claim that arose during a period that the Company did not have product liability coverage. In the event that we do not have adequate insurance or contractual indemnification, product liabilities relating to defective products could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial conditions, which could force us to curtail or cease our business operations.

Not Applicable to Smaller Reporting Company.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to be effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of Robert Carmichael, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial (and principal accounting) Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2018. Based upon that evaluation and the identification of the material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as described below under “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting,” the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting of the Company. Management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2018, based on the criteria established in 2013 Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2018, our internal control over financial reporting is not effective in providing reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles because of the Company’s limited resources and limited number of employees. To mitigate the current limited resources and limited employees, we rely heavily on direct management oversight of transactions, along with the use of legal and accounting professionals. As we grow, we expect to increase our number of employees, which will enable us to implement adequate segregation of duties within the internal control framework.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include, but are not limited to, the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time the Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, including matters relating to product liability claims. Such product liability claims sometimes involving wrongful death or injury have historically been covered by product liability insurance, which provided coverage for each claim up to $1,000,000. During the third quarter of 2014, the Company did not renew its product liability insurance since the renewal policy amount was cost prohibitive. As of August 15, 2017, the Company has obtained Product Liability Insurance, although prior claims are not covered under the new policy. The initial term of the policy was through August 14, 2018 and was renewed through August 14, 2019.

As previously disclosed, the Company, Trebor and other third parties, are each named as a co-defendants under an action filed in March 2015 in the Circuit Court of Broward County under Case No. CACE15-03238 by the Estate of Ernesto Rodriguez, claiming wrongful death and products liability resulting in the decedent’s drowning death while using a Brownie’s Third Lung product. This claim falls outside the Company’s period of insurance coverage. Plaintiff has claims damages exceeding $1,000,000. A default judgment was entered against Trebor in 2015 due to its failure to timely respond to the complaint. The Company has obtained different legal representation in this matter and attempted to have the default set aside. On November 2, 2016, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for sanctions against our company for frivolous litigation relating to our attempt to have the matter dismissed and granted the plaintiff’s motion to strike our motion for summary judgment due to our initial default. The Company believes the claim to be a Workers Compensation claim relating exclusively against other non-affiliated defendants and without merit, and will aggressively defend this action and appeal the default judgment. In the event Trebor is unable to overturn the default judgment and the defendants are determined to be at fault, we would seek to allocate damages among all of the other parties, including the plaintiff. At this time, the amount of any loss, or range of loss, cannot be reasonably estimated due to the undetermined validity of any claim or claims made by plaintiff and the mitigating factors among the parties. Therefore, the Company has not recorded reserves and contingent liabilities related to this matter. However, in the future, as the case progresses, the Company may be required to record a contingent liability or reserve for these matters.

Item 1a. Risk Factors

Not Applicable to Smaller Reporting Company.

Item 2. Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds

During the period covered by this report, the Company sold the equity securities below without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”) on reliance of the exemption from registration provided under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. The securities contain a legend restricting transfer absent registration or applicable exemption.

On January 6, 2018 the Company issued 217,391 Units consisting of 869,565 common shares and 217,391 common stock purchase warrants exercisable at $0.0115 per share. The warrants are exercisable at any time for a period of two years from date of issuance.

In January 2018, the Company issued 2,000,000 common shares to Mr. Dana Allan for his services for serving on our board of directors. The grant date fair value of the shares issued was $25,000.

On February 2, 2018 the Company issued 434,783 Units consisting of 1,739,130 common shares and 434,783 common stock purchase warrants exercisable at $0.0115 per share. The warrants are exercisable at any time for a period of two years from date of issuance.

On April 4, 2018, the Company issued 142,857 common stock shares to an employee of the Company with a value of $0.0125 per share totaling $1,786 which was charged to stock based compensation.

In April, 2018, the Company entered into an exclusive Patent License Agreement (“License Agreement”) relating to intellectual property to be utilized in underwater breathing systems supplying breathing air to divers at low pressure.

Under the License Agreement, the Company paid an initial license fee through the issuance of 759,422 common shares with a fair value of $30,000. The License Agreement further provides for royalties to be paid based on annual net revenues achieved utilizing the contracted technology.

In May 2018, the Company issued 200,000 common shares to two consultants with a value of $0.03 per share totaling $6,000 which was charged to consulting fees expense.

In July 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 722,160 shares of common stock to sixteen employees under a one-time employee stock incentive grant. The shares were fair valued at $0.022 per share based on market value at the time of the grant, with a total value recognized of $16,000.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

* Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, formatted in XBRL (extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) related notes to these financial statements tagged as blocks of text.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.