BSQUARE CORP /WA - Quarter Report: 2013 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-27687
BSQUARE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Washington | 91-1650880 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
110 110th Avenue NE, Suite 200, Bellevue WA |
98004 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(425) 519-5900
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of October 31, 2013: 11,233,580
Table of Contents
BSQUARE CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2013
Page | ||||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||
Item 1 | Financial Statements | 3 | ||||
Item 2 | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 15 | ||||
Item 3 | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 21 | ||||
Item 4 | Controls and Procedures | 21 | ||||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | ||||||
Item 1A | Risk Factors | 22 | ||||
Item 6 | Exhibits | 22 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
BSQUARE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
September 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 13,236 | $ | 9,903 | ||||
Short-term investments |
8,053 | 9,826 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $263 at September 30, 2013 and $200 at December 31, 2012 |
12,811 | 16,095 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
160 | 296 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
1,300 | 858 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
35,560 | 36,978 | ||||||
Equipment, furniture and leasehold improvements, net |
561 | 759 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
250 | 875 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
210 | 2,255 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
897 | 1,069 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,738 | 3,738 | ||||||
Other non-current assets |
93 | 117 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 41,309 | $ | 45,791 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Third-party software fees payable |
$ | 11,055 | $ | 11,099 | ||||
Accounts payable |
778 | 553 | ||||||
Accrued compensation |
1,986 | 2,205 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
1,332 | 1,732 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
1,074 | 837 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
16,225 | 16,426 | ||||||
Deferred tax liability |
206 | 206 | ||||||
Deferred rent |
422 | 154 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, no par value: 37,500,000 shares authorized; 11,203,707 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and 11,065,217 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 |
129,215 | 128,474 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(791 | ) | (733 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit |
(103,968 | ) | (98,736 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total shareholders equity |
24,456 | 29,005 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 41,309 | $ | 45,791 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
BSQUARE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Software |
$ | 18,456 | $ | 19,635 | $ | 51,818 | $ | 55,645 | ||||||||
Service |
5,116 | 5,850 | 14,461 | 19,893 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
23,572 | 25,485 | 66,279 | 75,538 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Software |
15,965 | 15,730 | 43,087 | 45,094 | ||||||||||||
Service |
4,238 | 4,913 | 12,683 | 16,410 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total cost of revenue |
20,203 | 20,643 | 55,770 | 61,504 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
3,369 | 4,842 | 10,509 | 14,034 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
3,960 | 2,866 | 11,432 | 10,557 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
804 | 861 | 2,205 | 2,909 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses |
4,764 | 3,727 | 13,637 | 13,466 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
(1,395 | ) | 1,115 | (3,128 | ) | 568 | ||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
(15 | ) | 28 | 100 | 122 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(1,410 | ) | 1,143 | (3,028 | ) | 690 | ||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(2,157 | ) | (533 | ) | (2,206 | ) | (470 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (3,567 | ) | $ | 610 | $ | (5,234 | ) | $ | 220 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic income (loss) per share |
$ | (0.32 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | (0.47 | ) | $ | 0.02 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted income (loss) per share |
$ | (0.32 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.47 | ) | $ | 0.02 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Shares used in calculation of income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
11,194 | 10,943 | 11,150 | 10,935 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted |
11,194 | 11,474 | 11,150 | 11,450 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (3,567 | ) | $ | 610 | $ | (5,234 | ) | $ | 220 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation, net of tax |
56 | (65 | ) | (35 | ) | (75 | ) | |||||||||
Change in unrealized gains on investments, net of tax |
1 | 6 | (2 | ) | 18 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (expense) |
57 | (59 | ) | (37 | ) | (57 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (3,510 | ) | $ | 551 | $ | (5,271 | ) | $ | 163 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
BSQUARE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,234 | ) | $ | 220 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
586 | 758 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
726 | 685 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,181 | 415 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
3,284 | (3,176 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(418 | ) | 367 | |||||
Third-party software fees payable |
(44 | ) | 2,303 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(394 | ) | (1,076 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue |
237 | 331 | ||||||
Deferred rent |
268 | (13 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
1,192 | 814 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of equipment and furniture |
(216 | ) | (336 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments |
8,932 | 8,400 | ||||||
Purchases of short-term investments |
(7,163 | ) | (10,535 | ) | ||||
Reduction of restricted cash |
625 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
2,178 | (2,471 | ) | |||||
Cash flows provided by financing activitiesproceeds from exercise of stock options |
12 | 193 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(49 | ) | (144 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
3,333 | (1,608 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
9,903 | 8,505 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 13,236 | $ | 6,897 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
BSQUARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of BSQUARE Corporation (BSQUARE) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for interim financial reporting and include the accounts of BSQUARE and our wholly owned subsidiaries. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In our opinion, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all material adjustments, all of which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary to present fairly our financial position as of September 30, 2013 and our operating results and cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The accompanying financial information as of December 31, 2012 is derived from audited financial statements. Preparing financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Examples include provisions for bad debts and income taxes, estimates of progress on professional engineering service arrangements and bonus accruals. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. All intercompany balances have been eliminated.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an accounting standard update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. Under ASU 2013-02, an entity is required to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the financial statements or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of AOCI by the respective line items of net income, but only if the amount reclassified is required to be reclassified in its entirety in the same reporting period. For amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures that provide additional details about those amounts. ASU 2013-02 does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in the financial statements. Our adoption of ASU 2013-02 effective January 1, 2013 did not have any effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic income or loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, and excludes any dilutive effects of common stock equivalent shares, such as options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. Restricted stock awards (RSAs) are considered outstanding and included in the computation of basic income or loss per share when underlying restrictions expire and the awards are no longer forfeitable. Restricted stock units (RSUs) are considered outstanding and included in the computation of basic income or loss per share only when vested. Diluted income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method.
Common stock equivalent shares of 940,812 and 837,812 and 993,687 and 904,637 were excluded from the computations of basic and diluted income per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively,, because their effect was anti-dilutive. Unvested but outstanding RSUs and RSAs which are forfeitable are included in the diluted income per share calculation. In a period where we are in a net loss position, the diluted loss per share is computed using the basic share count.
6
Table of Contents
2. Cash and Investments
Cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and restricted cash consisted of the following at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
September 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
Cash |
$ | 3,297 | $ | 2,590 | ||||
Cash equivalentsmoney market fund |
9,939 | 7,313 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
13,236 | 9,903 | ||||||
Short-term investments: |
||||||||
Municipal securities |
| 356 | ||||||
Corporate commercial paper |
1,250 | 4,374 | ||||||
Foreign government bonds |
1,001 | 999 | ||||||
Corporate debt securities |
5,802 | 4,097 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total short-term investments |
8,053 | 9,826 | ||||||
Restricted cashmoney market fund |
250 | 875 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash |
$ | 21,539 | $ | 20,604 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized gains and losses on our short-term investments were not material as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Our restricted cash balance at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 relates to a letter of credit which secures our corporate headquarters lease.
3. Fair Value Measurements
We measure our cash equivalents and short-term investments at fair value. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is established as a basis for considering such assumptions and for inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:
Level 1: | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | |
Level 2: | Directly or indirectly observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs used in models or other valuation methodologies. | |
Level 3: | Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. The inputs require significant management judgment or estimation. |
We classify our cash equivalents and short-term investments within Level 1 or Level 2 because our cash equivalents and short-term investments are valued using quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources and models utilizing market observable inputs.
7
Table of Contents
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are summarized below (in thousands):
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Direct or Indirect Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Total | ||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash equivalentsmoney market fund |
$ | 9,939 | $ | | $ | 9,939 | ||||||
Short-term investments: |
||||||||||||
Corporate commercial paper |
| 1,250 | 1,250 | |||||||||
Foreign government bonds |
| 1,001 | 1,001 | |||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
| 5,802 | 5,802 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total short-term investments |
| 8,053 | 8,053 | |||||||||
Restricted cashmoney market fund |
250 | | 250 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total assets measured at fair value |
$ | 10,189 | $ | 8,053 | $ | 18,242 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Direct or Indirect Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Total | ||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash equivalentsmoney market fund |
$ | 7,313 | $ | | $ | 7,313 | ||||||
Short-term investments: |
||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
| 356 | 356 | |||||||||
Corporate commercial paper |
| 4,374 | 4,374 | |||||||||
Foreign government bonds |
| 999 | 999 | |||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
| 4,097 | 4,097 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total short-term investments |
| 9,826 | 9,826 | |||||||||
Restricted cashmoney market fund |
875 | | 875 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total assets measured at fair value |
$ | 8,188 | $ | 9,826 | $ | 18,014 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill relates to the September 2011 acquisition of MPC Data, Ltd. (MPC), a United Kingdom based provider of embedded software engineering services. The excess of the acquisition consideration over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. There was no change in the carrying amount of goodwill during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Intangible assets relate to developed technology, trade names and trademarks, customer relationships, and non-compete agreements that we acquired from TestQuest Inc. in November 2008 and from the acquisition of MPC in September 2011.
8
Table of Contents
Information regarding our intangible assets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Value |
||||||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 1,275 | $ | (378 | ) | $ | 897 | |||||
Non-compete agreements |
196 | (196 | ) | 0 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 1,471 | $ | (574 | ) | $ | 897 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Value |
||||||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 1,275 | $ | (276 | ) | $ | 999 | |||||
Non-compete agreements |
196 | (126 | ) | 70 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 1,471 | $ | (402 | ) | $ | 1,069 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense was $56,000 and $172,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and $85,000 and $261,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. Amortization in future periods is expected to be as follows (in thousands):
Remainder of 2013 |
$ | 34 | ||
2014 |
135 | |||
2015 |
135 | |||
2016 |
130 | |||
2017 |
98 | |||
Thereafter |
365 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 897 | ||
|
|
5. Shareholders Equity
Stock Options
We have a stock plan (the Stock Plan) and an inducement stock plan for newly hired employees (the Inducement Plan) (collectively, the Plans). Under the Plans, stock options may be granted with a fixed exercise price that is equivalent to fair market value on the date of grant. These options have a term of up to 10 years and vest over a predetermined period, generally four years. Incentive stock options granted under the Stock Plan may only be granted to our employees. The Plans also allow for awards of non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, RSAs and unrestricted stock awards, and RSUs. The Inducement Plan was established in connection with the MPC acquisition. Initially, 250,000 shares were allocated for award under the Inducement Plan. As of September 30, 2013, there were 46,750 shares available for grant under the Inducement Plan. The number of shares available for award under the Inducement Plan may be modified by our Board of Directors, subject to SEC and NASDAQ limitations.
9
Table of Contents
Stock-Based Compensation
The estimated fair value of stock-based awards is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period of the award, net of estimated forfeitures. We estimate forfeitures of stock-based awards based on historical experience and expected future activity. The fair value of RSAs and RSUs is determined based on the number of shares granted and the quoted price of our common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of stock option awards is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of each vesting tranche as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) option-pricing model. The BSM model requires various highly judgmental assumptions including expected volatility and option life. If any of the assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period. The fair values of our stock option grants were estimated with the following weighted average assumptions:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Dividend yield |
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||
Expected life |
4 years | 4 years | 4 years | 4 years | ||||||||||||
Expected volatility |
58 | % | 73 | % | 62 | % | 73 | % | ||||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.1 | % | 0.5 | % | 0.8 | % | 0.6 | % |
The impact on our results of operations of recording stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Cost of revenue service |
$ | 48 | $ | 34 | $ | 184 | $ | 242 | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
145 | (267 | ) | 456 | 355 | |||||||||||
Research and development |
27 | 26 | 86 | 89 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 220 | $ | (207 | ) | $ | 726 | $ | 686 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Per diluted share |
$ | 0.02 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.06 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Activity
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the Plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2013:
Stock Options |
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2013 |
1,539,618 | $ | 3.55 | |||||||||||||
Granted at fair value |
270,080 | 2.98 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(3,000 | ) | 2.67 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(39,808 | ) | 3.50 | |||||||||||||
Expired |
(150,127 | ) | 4.24 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2013 |
1,616,763 | $ | 3.40 | 4.00 | $ | 257,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2013 |
1,557,509 | $ | 3.40 | 3.91 | $ | 257,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2013 |
1,156,660 | $ | 3.41 | 2.89 | $ | 254,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2013, total compensation cost related to stock options granted but not yet recognized was $281,000, net of estimated forfeitures. This cost will be amortized on the straight-line method over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.4 years. The following table summarizes certain information about stock options for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Weighted-average grant-date fair value of option grants for the period |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1.07 | 2.23 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Options in-the-money at period end |
541,000 | 616,350 | 541,000 | 616,350 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised |
$ | 0 | $ | 34,000 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 67,000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Table of Contents
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price of the underlying options and the quoted price of our common stock for the number of options that were in-the-money at period end or that were exercised during the period. We issue new shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options.
Restricted Stock Unit Activity
The following table summarizes RSU activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2013:
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|||||||
Unvested at January 1, 2013 |
236,513 | $ | 4.95 | |||||
Granted |
128,838 | 2.75 | ||||||
Vested |
(131,777 | ) | 3.97 | |||||
Forfeited |
(5,275 | ) | 6.75 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Unvested at September 30, 2013 |
228,299 | $ | 4.23 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Expected to vest after September 30, 2013 |
216,377 | $ | 4.05 | |||||
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2013, total compensation cost related to RSUs granted but not yet recognized was $656,000, net of estimated forfeitures. This cost will be amortized on the straight-line method over a period of approximately 1.4 years.
Common Stock Reserved for Future Issuance
The following table summarizes our shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the Plans at September 30, 2013:
September 30, 2013 |
||||
Stock options outstanding |
1,616,763 | |||
Restricted stock units outstanding |
228,299 | |||
Stock options available for future grant |
952,724 | |||
|
|
|||
Common stock reserved for future issuance |
2,797,786 | |||
|
|
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease and rent obligations
Our commitments include obligations outstanding under operating leases, which expire through 2020. We have lease commitments for office space in Bellevue, Washington; San Diego, California; Chandler, Arizona: Boston, Massachusetts: Taipei, Taiwan; Beijing, China; Seoul, Korea; Tokyo, Japan; Munich, Germany; and Trowbridge, UK. We also lease office space on a month-to-month basis in Akron, Ohio. Subsequent to September 30, 2013, we gave notice to terminate the Beijing, China and Munich Germany leases. See Note 10 for additional information.
In August 2013, we amended the lease agreement for our Bellevue, WA headquarters and extended the term of the original lease that was scheduled to expire in August 2014 to May 2020.
Rent expense was $402,000 and $1,156,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and $445,000 and $1,400,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. As of September 30, 2013, we had $250,000 pledged as collateral for a bank letter of credit under the terms of our headquarters facility lease. The pledged cash supporting the outstanding letter of credit is classified as restricted cash.
11
Table of Contents
Future operating lease commitments as of September 30, 2013 are as follows by calendar year (in thousands):*
Remainder of 2013 |
$ | 132 | ||
2014 |
1,135 | |||
2015 |
1,256 | |||
2016 |
1,281 | |||
2017 |
1,169 | |||
Thereafter |
2,656 | |||
|
|
|||
Total commitments |
$ | 7,629 | ||
|
|
* | As discussed above, subsequent to September 30, 2013, we gave notice to terminate the Beijing, China and Munich, Germany leases. The amounts disclosed above are as of September 30, 2013 and thus include amounts that would have been owed under the terminated leases. |
Volume Pricing Agreements
In conjunction with our activities under our OEM Distribution Agreements (ODAs) with Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft), as further described in Note 8, we enter into OEM Volume Royalty Pricing (OVRP) commitments with Microsoft. Under these OVRPs, we are provided with volume pricing on a customer-by-customer basis assuming certain minimum unit volumes are met. The OVRP terms are 12 months. In the event we dont meet the committed minimum unit volumes, we are obligated to pay the difference between the committed per-unit volume rate and the actual per-unit rate we achieved based upon actual units purchased. The OVRP arrangements do not equate to a minimum purchase commitment but rather, the arrangements are a volume pricing arrangement based upon actual volume purchased. In substantially all instances, we have reciprocal agreements with our customers such that we will receive per-unit price adjustments, similar to the amounts we would subsequently owe to Microsoft if such OVRP volumes are not met. However, in the event a customer is unwilling or unable to pay us, we would be negatively impacted. Based upon the credit-worthiness of our customers, our historical OVRP experience with our customers and OVRP arrangements in general, we do not believe we will incur any material liability in future periods and therefore no provision or reserve has been recorded as of September 30, 2013.
7. Information about Geographic Areas
Our chief operating decision-makers (i.e., Chief Executive Officer and certain direct reports) review financial information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. There are no segment managers who are held accountable by our chief operating decision-makers, or anyone else, for operations, operating results, or planning for levels or components below the consolidated unit level. Accordingly, we consider ourselves to be in a single reporting segment and operating unit structure.
Revenue by geography is based on the sales region of the customer. The following table sets forth revenue and long-lived assets by geographic area (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Total revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 20,875 | $ | 20,102 | $ | 59,714 | $ | 60,528 | ||||||||
Asia |
1,379 | 4,127 | 3,129 | 11,269 | ||||||||||||
Europe |
1,318 | 1,256 | 3,436 | 3,741 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 23,572 | $ | 25,485 | $ | 66,279 | $ | 75,538 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
Long-lived assets: |
||||||||
North America |
$ | 782 | $ | 3,663 | ||||
Asia |
410 | 447 | ||||||
Europe |
4,543 | 4,703 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total long-lived assets |
$ | 5,735 | $ | 8,813 | ||||
|
|
|
|
12
Table of Contents
8. Significant Risk Concentrations
Significant Customer
No customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenue for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2013 or September 30, 2012.
No customer had an accounts receivable balance which was 10% or more of the total accounts receivable at September 30, 2013. Bluebird Soft, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of handheld mobile devices, had an accounts receivable balance of $2.1 million, or 13% of total accounts receivable, as of December 31, 2012, all of which was subsequently collected. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of total accounts receivable at December 31, 2012.
Significant Supplier
We have ODAs with Microsoft which enable us to sell Microsoft Windows Embedded operating systems to our customers in the United States, Canada, the Caribbean (excluding Cuba), Mexico, the European Union and the European Free Trade Association, which expire on September 30, 2014. We also have ODAs with Microsoft which allow us to sell Microsoft Windows Mobile operating systems in the Americas, Japan, Taiwan, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. Our current distribution agreements related to Windows Mobile expire in September 2014. Our rights to distribute Windows Mobile operating systems in Korea ended on October 31, 2012. We sold $1.2 million and $2.9 million of Windows Mobile operating systems in Korea during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Software sales under these agreements constitute a significant portion of our software revenue and total revenue. These agreements are typically renewed annually or semi-annually; however, there is no automatic renewal provision in any of these agreements. Further, these agreements can be terminated unilaterally by Microsoft at any time. Microsoft currently offers a rebate program to sell Microsoft Windows Embedded operating systems pursuant to which we earn money for achieving certain predefined objectives. Prior to the third quarter of 2013, the earned rebate amount was treated as a reduction in software cost of sales in the quarter earned. Beginning in the third quarter of 2013, as a result of program modifications, we began treating a portion of the rebate as market development funds which will be accounted for as a reduction in marketing expense as qualified program spend occurs in the future.
Under this rebate program, we earned $89,000 and $658,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and $196,000 and $609,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30 2012, respectively, which was treated as a reduction in cost of sales. Additionally, during the three months ended September 30, 2013 we earned $208,000 which will be accounted for as a reduction in marketing expense in the future as qualified program expenditures are made.
9. Income Taxes
We determine our provision for income taxes for interim periods using an estimate of our annual effective rate. We record any changes to the estimated annual rate in the interim period in which the change occurs, including discrete tax items. Our effective tax rate was (153.7%) and 50.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and (72.8%) and 127.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The change in the effective tax rate for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same periods in 2012, was due to the recording of a valuation allowance related to United States deferred tax assets.
In the third quarter of 2013, we determined that it was not more likely than not that we would generate sufficient future taxable income to utilize the US deferred tax assets. As a result, we recorded a valuation allowance of $2.2 million. Deferred tax assets relative to our foreign jurisdictions were not affected.
The factors we considered in recording a full valuation allowance on our US deferred tax assets included, among other things, our recent history of losses over the last approximately three years.
13
Table of Contents
10. Subsequent Event
On October 10, 2013, we effected a restructuring that included a workforce reduction and the closure of our offices in Beijing, China and Munich, Germany. The restructuring was approved by our Board of Directors on October 9, 2013. The workforce reduction impacted approximately 50 headcount worldwide, including full-time employees and consultants, which represented approximately 20% of the Companys headcount pre-reduction.
We currently anticipate incurring pre-tax restructuring charges of approximately $625,000 in the fourth quarter of 2013, with $500,000 representing one-time employee termination benefits and $125,000 representing facilities-related costs, primarily remaining lease obligations in China and Germany. Our current estimate of cash outlays related to the one-time employee termination benefits, vacation and other obligations is $850,000, the vast majority of which will occur in the fourth quarter of 2013. Additionally, we expect to recognize a $50,000 asset impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2013 related to China and Germany.
We expect the staff reductions and office closures will be substantially completed by the end of the fourth quarter of 2013 with some activities, including legal entity closures, continuing into 2014.
14
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we, us, our and the Company refer to BSQUARE Corporation, a Washington corporation, and its subsidiaries.
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes. Some statements and information contained in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are not historical facts but are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). In some cases, readers can identify forward- looking statements by terms such as may, will, should, expect, plan, intend, forecast, anticipate, believe, estimate, predict, potential, continue, or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology, which when used are meant to signify the statement as forward-looking. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and situations that are difficult to predict and that may cause our own, or our industrys actual results, to be materially different from the future results that are expressed or implied by these statements. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those anticipated or expressed in such statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those discussed in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 entitled Risk Factors, similar discussions in subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q as applicable, and those contained from time to time in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We provide software solutions to companies that develop smart, connected systems. A smart, connected system is a dedicated purpose computing device that typically has a display, runs an operating system (e.g., Microsoft® Windows® CE or Google Android) and is usually connected to a network or data cloud via a wired or wireless connection. Examples of smart, connected systems include set-top boxes, home gateways, point-of-sale terminals, kiosks, voting machines, gaming platforms, tablets, handheld data collection devices, personal media players, smart phones and in-vehicle telematics and entertainment devices. We focus on smart, connected systems that utilize various Microsoft Windows Embedded and Windows Mobile operating systems, specifically Windows Embedded Compact, Windows Embedded Standard 7 and 8, Windows Mobile, Windows Phone 8 and Windows Embedded 8 Handheld as well as devices running other popular operating systems such as Android, Linux, and QNX.
We have been providing software solutions to the smart, connected systems marketplace since our inception. Our customers include world class original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), original design manufacturers (ODMs) and enterprises, as well as silicon vendors and peripheral vendors which purchase our software solutions for purposes of facilitating processor and peripheral sales to the aforementioned customer categories. In the case of enterprises, our customers include those who develop, market and distribute smart devices on their own behalf as well as those that purchase devices from OEMs or ODMs and require additional device software or testing. The software solutions we provide are utilized and deployed throughout various phases of our customers device life cycle, including design, development, customization, quality assurance and deployment.
Critical Accounting Judgments
Managements discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales, cost of sales and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. There have been no significant changes to our critical accounting judgments, policies and estimates as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, except for our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.
15
Table of Contents
Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate income taxes in each of the countries and other jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our current tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from the differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Net operating losses and tax credits, to the extent not already utilized to offset taxable income or income taxes, also give rise to deferred tax assets. We must then assess the likelihood that any deferred tax assets will be realized from future taxable income, and, to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets. We estimate the valuation allowance related to our deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis.
In the third quarter of 2013, we determined that it was not more likely than not that we would generate sufficient future taxable income to utilize the US deferred tax assets. As a result, we recorded a valuation allowance of $2.2 million. Deferred tax assets relative to our foreign jurisdictions were not affected.
The factors we considered in recording a full valuation allowance on our US deferred tax assets included, among other things, our recent history of losses over the last approximately three years.
Results of Operations
The following table presents certain financial data as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated. Our historical operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results for any future period.
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Software |
78 | % | 77 | % | 78 | % | 74 | % | ||||||||
Service |
22 | 23 | 22 | 26 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Software |
68 | 62 | 65 | 59 | ||||||||||||
Service |
18 | 19 | 19 | 22 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total cost of revenue |
86 | 81 | 84 | 81 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
14 | 19 | 16 | 19 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
17 | 11 | 18 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses |
20 | 15 | 21 | 18 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
(6 | ) | 4 | (5 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(6 | ) | 4 | (5 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||
Income expense |
(9 | ) | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | 0 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(15 | )% | 2 | % | (8 | )% | 0 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Our revenue is generated from the sale of software, both our own proprietary software and software of third parties that we resell, and the sale of engineering services. Total revenue decreased $1.9 million, or 8%, to $23.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $25.5 million in the year-ago period. Total revenue decreased $9.3 million, or 12%, to $66.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from $75.5 million in the year-ago period. These decreases were driven by lower service revenue and lower sales of Microsoft Windows Mobile operating systems.
Revenue from our customers outside of North America decreased $2.7 million, or 50%, to $2.7 million or 11% of total revenue, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $5.4 million or 21% of total revenue in the year-ago period. Revenue from our customers outside of North America decreased $8.4 million, or 56%, to $6.6 million or 10% of total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $15 million or 20% of total revenue in the year-ago period. These decreases were
16
Table of Contents
primarily driven by lower sales of Windows Mobile operating systems, lower service revenue in Japan and in Europe, Middle East and Asia (EMEA) region and lower proprietary software sales in EMEA. A portion of the Window Mobile sales decline resulted from the expiration of our Korea distribution rights on October 31, 2012. Korea contributed $1.2 million and $2.9 million of Windows Mobile operating system sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.
Software revenue
Software revenue consists of sales of third-party software and revenue realized from our own proprietary software products, which include software license sales, royalties from our software products, and support and maintenance revenue. Software revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was as follows (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Software revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Third-party software |
$ | 18,004 | $ | 18,339 | $ | 49,749 | $ | 52,424 | ||||||||
Proprietary software |
452 | 1,296 | 2,069 | 3,221 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total software revenue |
$ | 18,456 | $ | 19,635 | $ | 51,818 | $ | 55,645 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Software revenue as a percentage of total revenue |
78 | % | 77 | % | 78 | % | 74 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Third-party software revenue as a percentage of total software revenue |
98 | % | 93 | % | 96 | % | 94 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The vast majority of our third-party software revenue is comprised of sales of Microsoft Windows Embedded and Windows Mobile operating systems.
Third-party software revenue decreased $335,000, or 2%, for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from the year-ago period. The decrease was driven by a $3.4 million decline in sales of Windows Mobile operating systems, $1.8 million of which occurred internationally, while the rest of the decline occurred in North America. Of the international decline, $1.2 million related to the expiration of our Korea distribution rights, while the remainder and the North American decline were driven by declining demand from existing customers. The Windows Mobile decline was offset by a $3.2 million increase in sales of Windows Embedded operating systems which was driven by higher demand at a few of our larger customers and several large sales to new customers.
Third-party software revenue decreased $2.7 million, or 5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the year-ago period. The decrease was driven by a $7.0 million decline in sales of Windows Mobile operating systems, $4.5 million of which occurred internationally, while the rest of the decline occurred in North America. Of the international decline, $2.9 million relates to the expiration of our Korea distribution rights, while the remainder of the international decline and the North American decline were driven by declining demand from existing customers. The Windows Mobile decline was offset by a $4.3 million increase in sales of Windows Embedded operating systems. This increase was due to the same factors noted above.
Proprietary software revenue decreased $844,000, or 65%, to $452,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $1.3 million in the year-ago period driven primarily by a significant amount of HTML5 revenue in Japan in 2012 and a decline in Handset Certification Platform revenue from our customers in China who did not to renew their subscription contracts.
Proprietary software revenue decreased $1.2 million, or 36%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the year-ago period, driven primarily by the same factors which accounted for the three-month decrease.
Service revenue
Service revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was as follows (dollars in thousands):
Three Months ended September 30, |
Nine Months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Service revenue |
$ | 5,116 | $ | 5,850 | $ | 14,461 | $ | 19,893 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Service revenue as a percentage of total revenue |
22 | % | 23 | % | 22 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Table of Contents
Service revenue decreased $734,000, or 13%, for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from the year-ago period. This decrease was due to a $293,000 decline in North America driven primarily by the MyFord Touch program. We also experienced a $202,000 decrease in EMEA and a $172,000 decrease in Japan due to declines in activity from large customers.
Service revenue decreased $5.4 million, or 27%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the year-ago period. The decrease was the result of a $2.6 million decline in North America driven by a $1.4 million decrease associated with the MyFord Touch program and a decline at two other significant customers with whom we currently have no active programs. We also experienced a $1.7 million decline in Japan and an $864,000 decline in EMEA, as previously noted.
Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft) became our largest engineering services customer during the first quarter of 2012, replacing Ford Motor Company (Ford), as Microsoft replaced Ford as the invoiced customer on the MyFord Touch program. We continue to work on the MyFord Touch, a project we began with Ford during the second quarter of 2008; however, we now conduct these services through an agreement with Microsoft. During the initial project with Ford, we provided hardware design and implementation, platform level software development, application level software development, quality assurance services and systems integration services. The project has transitioned since the initial project such that we are now primarily focused on developing and integrating new user applications for the MyFord Touch, enhancing existing applications and customizing the MyFord Touch platform for additional vehicle models. Service revenue from the MyFord Touch program declined $441,000 to $1.2 million, or 24% of total service revenue, for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to $1.7 million, or 28% of total service revenue, in the year-ago period. Service revenue from the MyFord Touch program declined $1.4 million to $3.7 million, or 26% of total service revenue, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to $5.1 million, or 26% of total service revenue, in the year-ago period. The decline is primarily attributable to a reduction in the number of engineers working on the MyFord Touch project.
Gross profit and gross margin
Cost of software revenue consists primarily of the cost of third-party software products payable to third-party vendors and support costs associated with our proprietary software products. Cost of service revenue consists primarily of salaries and benefits, contractor costs and re-billable expenses, related facilities and depreciation costs, and amortization of certain intangible assets related to acquisitions. Gross profit on the sale of third-party software products is also positively affected by rebate credits we receive from Microsoft for the sale of Windows Embedded operating systems earned through the achievement of defined objectives. Prior to the third quarter of 2013, the earned rebate amount was treated as a reduction in software cost of sales in the quarter earned. Beginning in the third quarter of 2013, as a result of program modifications, we began treating a portion of the rebate as market development funds which will be accounted for as a reduction in marketing expense as qualified program expenditures are made.
Under this rebate program, we earned $89,000 and $658,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and $196,000 and $609,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30 2012, respectively, which was treated as a reduction in cost of sales. Additionally, during the three months ended September 30, 2013 we earned $208,000 which will be accounted for as a reduction in marketing expense in the future as qualified program expenditures are made.
Gross profit and related gross margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Software gross profit |
$ | 2,491 | $ | 3,905 | $ | 8,731 | $ | 10,551 | ||||||||
Software gross margin |
13 | % | 20 | % | 17 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||
Service gross profit |
$ | 878 | $ | 937 | $ | 1,778 | $ | 3,483 | ||||||||
Service gross margin |
17 | % | 16 | % | 12 | % | 18 | % | ||||||||
Total gross profit |
$ | 3,369 | $ | 4,842 | $ | 10,509 | $ | 14,034 | ||||||||
Total gross margin |
14 | % | 19 | % | 16 | % | 19 | % |
Software gross profit and gross margin
Software gross profit decreased by $1.4 million, or 36%, for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from the year-ago period, while software gross margin decreased by six percentage points. The decrease in gross profit was primarily the result of decreased high-margin proprietary software sales and Microsoft Windows Mobile operating system sales. Third-party software gross margin was 13% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, and 16% in the year-ago period. The decrease in gross margin was driven by the higher margin Window Mobile revenue decline and the change in how rebates from the sale of Windows Embedded
18
Table of Contents
operating systems are treated. Prior to the third quarter of 2013, the earned rebate amount was treated as a reduction in software cost of sales in the quarter earned. Beginning in the third quarter of 2013, as a result of program modifications, we began treating a portion of the rebate as market development funds which will be accounted for as a reduction in marketing expense as qualified program expenditures are made. Proprietary software gross margin was 42% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 80% in the year-ago period, driven by the revenue decline compared to a relatively fixed cost of sales base.
Software gross profit decreased by $1.8 million, or 17%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from the year-ago period, while software gross margin decreased by two percentage points. The decrease in software gross profit and gross margin was driven by the same factors as the current quarter. Third-party software margin was 15% and 16% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively with the decline attributable to the same factors as the current quarter. Proprietary software margin was 68% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 75% in the year-ago period. This decrease was due to the same factors as the current quarter.
Service gross profit and gross margin
Service gross profit decreased $59,000, or 6%, for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from the year-ago period. Service gross margin increased by one percentage point to 17% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the year-ago period.
Service gross profit decreased $1.7 million, or 49%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from the year-ago period driven by a $5.4 million decline in service revenue without a commensurate decline in service cost of sales. Service gross margin was 12% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, a six percentage point decrease from 18% in the year-ago period. The margin decline was driven by a 10% increase in our cost per billable hour due to lower utilization and wage increases.
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related benefits, commissions for our sales teams, marketing and administrative personnel and related facilities and depreciation costs, as well as professional services fees (e.g., consulting, legal, tax and audit). Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1.1 million, or 38%, to $4.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $2.9 million in the year-ago period. The increase was driven primarily by an increase in sales compensation and travel expenses, of which $531,000 related to a non-recurring reduction in stock-based compensation expense during the three months ended September 30, 2012 in connection with the departure of our former Vice-President of Sales. The increase is also attributable to $167,000 of severance expense related to the departure of our former Chief Executive Officer in September 2013. Selling, general and administrative expenses represented 17% of our total revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 11% in the year-ago period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $875,000, or 8%, to $11.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from $10.6 million in the year-ago period, driven by the same factors noted above. Selling, general and administrative expenses represented 17% of our total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 14% for the year-ago period.
Research and development
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for software development and quality assurance personnel, contractor and consultant costs and related facilities and depreciation costs. Research and development expenses decreased $57,000, or 7%, to $804,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $861,000 in the year-ago period due primarily to headcount reductions and an office closure which took place in the third quarter of 2012. Research and development expenses represented 3% of our total revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 3% in the year-ago period.
Research and development expenses decreased $704,000, or 24%, to $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from $2.9 million in the year-ago period, driven by the same factors noted above. Research and development expenses represented 3% of our total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 4% for the year-ago period.
Other income (expense), net
Other income or expense consists of interest income on our cash, cash equivalents and investments, gains and/or losses recognized on our investments, as well as gains or losses on foreign exchange transactions. Other expense increased $41,000 to $13,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from income of $28,000 in the year-ago period due to higher foreign currency losses.
19
Table of Contents
Other income decreased $20,000, or 16%, to $102,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, from $122,000 in the year-ago period.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense was $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to $533,000 in the year-ago period, a change of $1.6 million.
In the third quarter of 2013, we determined that it was not more likely than not that we would generate sufficient future taxable income to utilize the US deferred tax assets. As a result, we recorded a valuation allowance of $2.2 million. Deferred tax assets relative to our foreign jurisdictions were not affected.
The factors we considered in recording a full valuation allowance on our US deferred tax assets included, among other things, our recent history of losses over the last approximately three years.
Subsequent Event
On October 10, 2013, we effected a restructuring that included a workforce reduction and the closure of our offices in Beijing, China and Munich, Germany. The restructuring was approved by our Board of Directors on October 9, 2013. The workforce reduction impacted approximately 50 headcount worldwide, including full-time employees and consultants, which represented approximately 20% of the Companys headcount pre-reduction.
We currently anticipate incurring pre-tax restructuring charges of approximately $625,000 in the fourth quarter of 2013, with $500,000 representing one-time employee termination benefits and $125,000 representing facilities-related costs, primarily remaining lease obligations in China and Germany. Our current estimate of cash outlays related to the one-time employee termination benefits, vacation and other obligations is $850,000, the vast majority of which will occur in the fourth quarter of 2013. Additionally, we expect to recognize a $50,000 asset impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2013 related to China and Germany.
We expect the staff reductions and office closures will be substantially completed by the end of the fourth quarter of 2013 with some activities, including legal entity closures, continuing into 2014.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2013, we had $21.5 million of cash, cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments and restricted cash, compared to $20.6 million at December 31, 2012. Of these amounts, $13.2 million and $9.9 million were classified as cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and $250,000 and $875,000 were classified as long-term at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, driven by positive net working capital changes of $2.9 million and non-cash expenses of $3.5 million, which were offset substantially by our net loss of $5.4 million. Net cash provided by operating activities was $814,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, driven by non-cash expenses of $1.9 million offset in part by $1.3 million in net negative working capital changes.
Investing activities provided cash of $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, due primarily to net proceeds of short-term investments of $1.8 million and a $625,000 reduction in restricted cash under the terms of our corporate headquarters lease amendment executed in August 2013. Investing activities used cash of $2.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, primarily due to net purchases of short-term investments of $2.1 million and $336,000 in equipment purchases.
Financing activities generated $12,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, and $193,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, as a result of the exercise of stock options.
We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and investments will be sufficient to meet our needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months.
Cash Commitments
We have the following future or potential cash commitments:
| Minimum rents payable under operating leases total $132,000 for the remainder of 2013, $1.1 million in 2014, $1.3 million in 2015 and 2016, $1.2 million in 2017 and $2.7 million thereafter. The increase in minimum rents payable since December 31, 2012 relates to extending the term of our Bellevue, WA headquarters office lease which was originally scheduled to expire in August 2014 to May 2020; and |
20
Table of Contents
| In conjunction with our activities under our ODAs with Microsoft, we enter OVRP commitments with Microsoft. Under these OVRPs, we are provided with volume pricing on a customer-by-customer basis assuming certain minimum unit volumes are met. The OVRP terms are 12 months. In the event we dont meet the committed minimum unit volumes, we are obligated to pay the difference between the committed per-unit volume rate and the actual per-unit rate we achieved based upon actual units purchased. The OVRP arrangements do not equate to a minimum purchase commitment but rather, the arrangements are a volume pricing arrangement based upon actual volume purchased. In substantially all instances, we have reciprocal agreements with our customers such that we will receive per-unit price adjustments, similar to the amounts we would subsequently owe to Microsoft if such OVRP volumes are not met. However, in the event a customer is unwilling or unable to pay us, we would be negatively impacted. Based upon the credit-worthiness of our customers, our historical OVRP experience with our customers and OVRP arrangements in general, we do not believe we will incur any material liability in the current or future periods. |
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Not applicable.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
There were no changes to our disclosure controls during the three months ended September 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
21
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
There has been no material change in the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, other than below.
Expected operating efficiencies from our restructuring plans may not be realized as anticipated.
In October 2013, we effected a restructuring that included a workforce reduction and the closure of our offices in Beijing, China and Munich, Germany. The restructuring is intended to reduce expenses, both service and proprietary software cost of sales and all areas of operating expenses, by approximately $4 million annually and better align our organizational structure with our strategic focus. Factors which may affect the potential operating efficiencies we expect to realize from our restructuring plans include the adverse impact of job eliminations and office closings, uncertainties associated with loss of customer and vendor confidence, potential negative impact on sales and customer service as well as factors outside of our control such as changes in the economic environment. We cannot be certain that the anticipated benefits will be realized under our restructuring plans, which could result in further restructuring efforts. If our restructuring plans are not successful, our business and results of operations may be negatively impacted.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
22
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BSQUARE CORPORATION (Registrant) | ||||
Date: November 12, 2013 | By: | /S/ JERRY CHASE | ||
Jerry Chase Interim Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: November 12, 2013 | By: | /S/ SCOTT C. MAHAN | ||
Scott C. Mahan Senior Vice President, Operations and Chief Financial Officer |
23
Table of Contents
BSQUARE CORPORATION
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Filed Here with |
Incorporated by Reference | |||||||||||||||||||
Form | Filing Date | Exhibit | File No. | |||||||||||||||||||
3.1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation | S-1 | 8/17/1999 | 3.1 | (a) | 333-85351 | ||||||||||||||||
3.1(a) |
Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation | 10-Q | 8/7/2000 | 3.1 | 000-27687 | |||||||||||||||||
3.1(b) |
Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation | 8-K | 10/11/2005 | 3.1 | 000-27687 | |||||||||||||||||
3.2 |
Bylaws and all amendments thereto | 10-K | 3/19/2003 | 3.2 | 000-27687 | |||||||||||||||||
10.5(a) |
First Amendment to Office Lease by and between the Company and Talon Portfolio Services, LLC, dated August 26, 2013 and effective as of June 1, 2013 | 8-K | 8/30/2013 | 10.1 | 000-27687 | |||||||||||||||||
10.7(b)(1) |
Letter Agreement dated August 7, 2013 to Scott Mahan amending Employment Letter Agreement | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.8(b)(1) |
Separation and Release Agreement by and between the Company and Brian Crowley dated September 23, 2013 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.8(c)(1) |
Individual Contractor Services Agreement by and between the Company and Brian Crowley dated September 23, 2013 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.13(1) |
Employment Letter Agreement by and between the Company and Mark D. Whiteside dated effective May 1, 2011 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.13(a)(1) |
First Amendment to Employment Letter Agreement by and between the Company and Mark D. Whiteside dated December 19, 2012 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.13(b)(1) |
Letter Agreement dated August 7, 2013 to Mark D. Whiteside amending Employment Letter | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
10.14(1) |
Individual Contractor Services Agreement by and between the Company and Jerry Chase dated September 23, 2013 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
31.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
31.2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
32.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
32.2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
101.INS |
XBRL Instance Document | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
101.SCH |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
101.CAL |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
101.DEF |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | X |
24
Table of Contents
Exhibit Number |
Description |
Filed Here with |
Incorporated by Reference | |||||||||||
Form | Filing Date | Exhibit | File No. | |||||||||||
101.LAB |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | X | ||||||||||||
101.PRE |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase | X |
25