BUCKLE INC - Annual Report: 2009 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
2009
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
Transition Period from ____________ to ____________
Commission File Number: 001-12951
THE BUCKLE, INC.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Nebraska
|
47-0366193
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
2407
West 24th Street, Kearney, Nebraska
|
68845-4915
|
||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code: (308) 236-8491
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of class
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which
Registered
|
|||
Common
Stock, $0.01 par value
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K o.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer, non-accelerated filer or smaller reporting company. (See definition of
“accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Check one.
þ Large accelerated
filer; o Accelerated
filer; o Non-accelerated filer;
o Smaller Reporting
Company
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes oNo þ
The
aggregate market value (based on the closing price of the New York Stock
Exchange) of the common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the
registrant was $806,269,916.59 on August 1, 2008. For purposes of
this response, executive officers and directors are deemed to be the affiliates
of the Registrant and the holdings by non-affiliates was computed as 15,991,073
shares.
The
number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock, as of March 26,
2009, was 46,149,905.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the definitive Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 2009 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held May 29, 2009 are incorporated by reference in Part
III.
The
Buckle, Inc.
Form
10-K
January
31, 2009
Table
of Contents
Page
|
||
Part
I
|
||
Item
1.
|
Business
|
3
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
11
|
Item
1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
14
|
Item
2.
|
Properties
|
15
|
Item
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
15
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
15
|
Part
II
|
||
Item
5.
|
Market
for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters, and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
16
|
Item
6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
18
|
Item
7.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
19
|
Item
7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
29
|
Item
8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
30
|
Item
9.
|
Changes
In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
53
|
Item
9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
53
|
Item
9B.
|
Other
Information
|
55
|
Part
III
|
||
Item
10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
|
55
|
Item
11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
55
|
Item
12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
55
|
Item
13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
55
|
Item
14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
55
|
Part
IV
|
||
Item
15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedule
|
55
|
2
PART
I
ITEM
1 - BUSINESS
The
Buckle, Inc. (the "Company") is a retailer of medium to better-priced casual
apparel, footwear, and accessories for fashion conscious young men and
women. As of January 31, 2009, the Company operated 387 retail stores
in 39 states throughout the continental United States under the names "Buckle"
and "The Buckle." The Company markets a wide selection of mostly
brand name casual apparel including denims, other casual bottoms, tops,
sportswear, outerwear, accessories, and footwear. The Company
emphasizes personalized attention to its customers and provides customer
services such as free hemming, free gift-wrapping, easy layaways, the Buckle
private label credit card, and a frequent shopper program. Most
stores are located in regional, high-traffic shopping malls and lifestyle
centers, and this is the Company's strategy for future expansion. The
majority of the Company's central office functions, including purchasing,
pricing, accounting, advertising, and distribution, are controlled from its
headquarters and distribution center in Kearney, Nebraska. The
Company’s men’s buying team and a portion of its marketing team are located in
Overland Park, Kansas.
Incorporated
in Nebraska in 1948, the Company commenced business under the name Mills
Clothing, Inc., a conventional men's clothing store with only one
location. In 1967, a second store, under the trade name Brass Buckle,
was purchased. In the early 1970s, the store image changed to
that of a jeans store with a wide selection of denims and
shirts. The first branch store was opened in Columbus,
Nebraska, in 1976. In 1977, the Company began selling young women's
apparel and opened its first mall store. The Company changed its
corporate name to The Buckle, Inc. on April 23, 1991. The Company has
experienced significant growth over the past ten years, growing from 222 stores
at the start of 1999 to 387 stores at the end of fiscal 2008. All
references herein to fiscal 2008 refer to the 52-week period ended January 31,
2009. Fiscal 2007 refers to the 52-week period ended February 2, 2008
and fiscal 2006 refers to the 53-week period ended February 3,
2007.
The
Company's principal executive offices and distribution center are located at
2407 West 24th Street, Kearney, Nebraska 68845. The Company's
telephone number is (308) 236-8491. The Company publishes its
corporate web site at www.buckle.com.
Available
Information
The
Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, along with all other reports and
amendments filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission,
are publicly available free of charge on the Investor Information section of the
Company’s website at www.buckle.com as
soon as reasonably practicable after the Company files such materials with, or
furnishes them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
Company’s corporate governance policies, ethics code, and Board of Directors’
committee charters are also posted within this section of the
website. The information on the Company’s website is not part
of this or any other report The Buckle, Inc. files with, or furnishes to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Marketing
and Merchandising
The
Company's marketing and merchandising strategy is designed to create customer
loyalty by offering a wide selection of key brand name and private label
merchandise and providing a broad range of value-added services. The
Company believes it provides a unique specialty apparel store experience with
merchandise designed to appeal to the fashion conscious 15 to 27-year
old. The merchandise mix includes denims, casual bottoms, tops,
sportswear, outerwear, accessories, and footwear. Denim is a
significant contributor to total sales (41.4% of fiscal 2008 net sales) and is a
key to the Company's merchandising strategy. The Company believes it
attracts customers with its wide selection of branded and private label denim
and a wide variety of fits, finishes, and styles. Tops are also
significant contributors to total sales (39.0% of fiscal 2008 net sales). The
Company strives to provide a continually changing selection of the latest casual
fashions.
3
The
percentage of net sales over the past three fiscal years of the Company's major
product lines are set forth in the following table:
Percentage of Net Sales | ||||||||||||
|
Fiscal 2008
|
Fiscal 2007
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|||||||||
Denims
|
41.4 | % | 43.2 | % | 44.6 | % | ||||||
Tops
(including sweaters)
|
39.0 | 36.1 | 31.0 | |||||||||
Accessories
|
7.7 | 7.7 | 9.2 | |||||||||
Footwear
|
4.6 | 5.6 | 7.0 | |||||||||
Sportswear/fashions
|
4.6 | 4.3 | 3.9 | |||||||||
Outerwear
|
2.0 | 2.0 | 2.3 | |||||||||
Casual
bottoms
|
0.6 | 1.0 | 1.9 | |||||||||
Other
|
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
Brand
name merchandise accounted for approximately 72% of the Company's sales during
fiscal 2008. The remaining balance is comprised of private label
merchandise that is manufactured to the Company's specifications. The
Company's merchandisers continually work with manufacturers and vendors to
produce brand name merchandise that they believe is unique in color, style, and
fit. While the brands offered by the Company change to meet current
customer preferences, the Company currently offers brands such as Big Star, MEK,
Affliction, Sinful, Lucky Brand Dungarees, Silver, Hurley, Billabong, Fossil,
Quiksilver/Roxy, Miss Me, 7 Diamonds, OBEY, and Ed Hardy. The Company
expects that brand name merchandise will continue to constitute the majority of
sales.
Management
believes the Company provides a unique store environment by maintaining a high
level of personalized service and by offering a wide selection of fashionable,
quality merchandise. The Company believes it is essential to create
an enjoyable shopping environment and, in order to fulfill this mission, it
employs highly motivated employees who provide personal attention to
customers. Each salesperson is educated to help create a complete
look for the customer by helping them find the best fits and showing merchandise
as coordinating outfits. The Company also incorporates specialized services such
as free alterations, free gift wrapping, layaways, a frequent shopper card, the
Buckle private label credit card, and a special order system that allows stores
to obtain specifically requested merchandise from other Company
stores. Customers are encouraged to use the Company's layaway plan,
which allows customers to make a partial payment on merchandise that is then
held by the store until the balance is paid. For the past three
fiscal years, an average of approximately 2% – 3% of net sales has been made on
a layaway basis.
Merchandising
and pricing decisions are made centrally; however, the Company's distribution
system allows for variation in the mix of merchandise distributed to each
store. This allows individual store inventories to be tailored to
reflect differences in customer buying patterns at various
locations. In addition, to assure a continually fresh look in
its stores, the Company ships new merchandise daily to most
stores. The Company also has a transfer program that shifts certain
merchandise to locations where it is selling best. This distribution
and transfer system helps to maintain customer satisfaction by providing
in-stock popular items and reducing the need to mark down slow-moving
merchandise at a particular location. The Company believes the
reduced markdowns justify the incremental distribution costs associated with the
transfer system. The Company does not hold storewide off-price sales
at anytime.
The
Company continually evaluates its store design as part of the overall shopping
experience and feels the fiscal 2002 re-design continues to be well received by
both guests and developers. This store design contains warm wood
fixtures and floors, real brick finishes, and an appealing ceiling and lighting
layout that creates a comfortable environment for the guest to
shop. The Company has been able to modify the store design for
specialized venues including lifestyle centers and larger mall
fronts. The signature Buckle-B icon and red color are used throughout
the store on fixtures, graphic images, and print materials to reinforce the
brand identity. To enhance selling and product presentation,
new tables and fixtures have been added to the Company’s signature store design
in each of the last five fiscal years. The new tables and fixtures
were also rolled out to select existing stores to update their looks as
well.
4
Marketing
and Advertising
In fiscal
2008, the Company spent $7.7 million, or 1.0% of net sales, on seasonal
marketing campaigns, advertising, promotions, online marketing, and in-store
point of sale materials. Seasonal image and promotional signage is
presented in store window displays and on merchandising presentations throughout
the store to complement the product and reinforce the brand's
image. Promotions such as sweepstakes, gift with purchase offers, and
special events are offered to enhance the guest’s shopping
experience. Seasonal image guides, featuring current fashion trends
and product selection, are distributed in the stores, at special events, and in
new markets. The Buckle partners with key merchandise vendors on
joint advertising and promotional opportunities that expand the marketing reach
and position the Buckle as the destination store for these specialty branded
fashions.
The
Company also offers programs to strengthen its relationships with loyal
guests. The Company continues to support a frequent shopper program
(the Buckle Primo Card), a rewards program designed to build customer
loyalty. Private label credit card marketing is another avenue for
marketing to loyal guests. The Company extends exclusive benefits to
active Buckle Cardholders such as bonus rewards and special targeted
mailings. The Buckle continues to build on its B-Rewards incentive
program, which is offered exclusively to Buckle
Cardholders. Qualifying Cardholders are mailed B-Rewards merchandise
certificates at the end of each Rewards period inviting them back into the store
at the start of the next season. The Company successfully
added a student credit card program for all stores in July 2006 and in October
2007 launched the Buckle Black credit card program. The Buckle Black
program is an exclusive account for the Company's most loyal
cardholders. To qualify for the Buckle Black program, existing
cardholders must make at least $500 in purchases during a 12 month period using
their account. These guests receive special benefits including free
ground shipping on special orders and online purchases. The Buckle
Card marketing program is partially funded by WFNNB, a third-party bank that
owns the Buckle Card accounts.
The
Company publishes a corporate web site at www.buckle.com. The
Company’s web site serves as a second retail touch-point for cross-channel
marketing, reaching a growing online audience. Buckle.com is an
eCommerce enabled channel with an interactive, entertaining, informative, and
brand building environment where guests can shop, enter sweepstakes, fill out a
wish list, find out about career opportunities, and read the Company’s latest
financial news. The Company maintains an opt-in email
database. National email campaigns are sent bi-monthly and targeted
weekly messages are sent notifying guests of the latest store promotions and
product offerings. Search engine and affiliate marketing programs are managed to
increase online and in-store traffic as well as conversion
rates. Buckle’s online store was launched April 26, 1999 as a
marketing tool, to extend the Company’s brand beyond the physical
locations. Offering a growing selection of its merchandise online,
the Company presents the online store as a “taste test” in new markets as well
as a cross-channel tool in existing markets, which means guests can shop both in
the physical stores and via the online store. On October 19, 2006,
the Company launched a redesigned Buckle.com on the Escalate E-Commerce
platform. The new Buckle.com includes enhanced search features, which
allow guests to shop by special attributes, including brand and
size.
Store
Operations
The
Company has a Vice President of Sales, one regional manager, 18 district
managers, 6 sub-district managers, and 65 area managers. The majority
of the district managers and each of the area managers also serve as manager of
their home base store. In general, each store has one manager, one or
two assistant managers, one to three additional full-time salespeople, and up to
20 part-time salespeople. Most stores have peak levels of staff
during the back-to-school and Christmas seasons. Almost every
location also employs a seamstress.
The
Company places great importance on educating quality personnel. In
addition to sharing career opportunities with current Buckle employees, the
Company also recruits interns and management trainees from college
campuses. A majority of the Company’s store managers, all of its area
and district managers, and most of its executive management team are former
salespeople, including the President and CEO, Dennis H. Nelson, and Chairman,
Daniel J. Hirschfeld. Recognizing talent and promoting managers from
within allows the Company to build a strong foundation for
management.
Store
managers receive compensation in the form of a base salary and incentive
bonuses. District and area managers also receive added incentives
based upon the performance of stores in their district/area. Store
managers perform sales training for new employees at the store
level.
5
The
Company has established a comprehensive program stressing the prevention and
control of shrinkage losses. Steps taken to reduce shrinkage include
monitoring cash refunds, voids, inappropriate discounts, employee sales, and
returns-to-vendor. The Company also has electronic article
surveillance systems in all of the Company’s stores as well as surveillance
camera systems in approximately 99% of the stores. As a result, the
Company achieved a merchandise shrinkage rate of 0.5% of net sales for fiscal
2008 and 2007 and 0.7% for fiscal year 2006.
The
average store is approximately 5,000 square feet (of which the Company estimates
an average of approximately 80% is selling space), and stores range in size from
2,600 square feet to 8,475 square feet.
Purchasing
and Distribution
The
Company has an experienced buying team. The buying team includes the
President, Vice President of Women’s Merchandising, Vice President of Men’s
Merchandising, eight women’s buyers, and eight men’s buyers. The two
Vice Presidents of Merchandising have over 55 years of combined experience with
the Company. The experience and leadership within the buying team
contributes significantly to the Company’s success by enabling the buying team
to react quickly to changes in fashion and by providing extensive knowledge of
sources for both branded and private label goods.
The
Company purchases products from manufacturers within the United States as well
as from agents who source goods from foreign manufacturers. The
Company's merchandising team shops and monitors U.S. fashion centers (in New
York and on the West Coast) to stay abreast of the latest trends. The
Company continually monitors fabric selection, quality, and delivery
schedules. The Company has not experienced any material difficulties
with merchandise manufactured in foreign countries. The Company does
not have long-term or exclusive contracts with any brand name manufacturer,
private label manufacturer, or supplier. The Company plans its
private label production with several private label vendors three to six months
in advance of product delivery. The Company requires its vendors to
sign and adhere to its Code of Conduct and Standards of Engagement, which
addresses adherence to legal requirements regarding employment practices and
health, safety, and environmental regulations.
In fiscal
2008, Koos Manufacturing, Inc. (the Company that produces part of the Company’s
private label product as well as the Big Star branded merchandise) made up 25.5%
of the Company’s net sales. No other vendor accounted for more than
10% of the Company’s net sales. Other current significant vendors
include MEK, Affliction, Sinful, Lucky Brand Dungarees, Silver, Hurley,
Billabong, Fossil, Quiksilver/Roxy, Miss Me, 7 Diamonds, OBEY, and Ed
Hardy. The Company continually strives to offer brands that are
currently popular with its customers and, therefore, the Company's suppliers and
purchases from specific vendors may vary significantly from year to
year.
Buckle
stores generally carry the same merchandise, with quantity and seasonal
variations based upon historical sales data, climate, and perceived local
customer demand. The Company uses a centralized receiving and
distribution center located within the corporate headquarters building in
Kearney, Nebraska. Merchandise is received daily in Kearney where it
is sorted, tagged with bar-coded tickets (unless the vendor UPC code is used or
the merchandise is pre-ticketed), and packaged for distribution to individual
stores primarily via United Parcel Service. The Company's goal is to
ship the majority of its merchandise out to the stores within one to two
business days of receipt. This system allows stores to receive new
merchandise almost daily, creating excitement within the store and providing
customers with a reason to shop often.
The
Company has developed an effective computerized system for tracking merchandise
from the time it is checked in at the Company's distribution center until it
arrives at the stores and is sold to a customer. The system's
function is to insure that store shipments are delivered accurately and
promptly, to account for inventory, and to assist in allocating merchandise
among stores. Management can track, on a daily basis, which
merchandise is selling at specific locations and direct transfers of merchandise
from one store to another as necessary. This allows stores to carry a
reduced inventory while at the same time satisfying customer
demands.
To reduce
inter-store shipping costs and provide timely restocking of in-season
merchandise, the Company warehouses a portion of initial shipments for later
distribution. Sales reports are then used to replenish, on a basis of
one to three times each week, those stores that are experiencing the greatest
success selling specific styles, colors, and sizes of
merchandise. This system is also designed to prevent an over-crowded
look in the stores at the beginning of a season.
6
The
Company completed an 82,200 square foot expansion to its corporate headquarters
facility during fiscal 2005, which houses its online fulfillment and customer
service center as well as its supplies and returns-to-vendor
departments. The online fulfillment infrastructure currently occupies
approximately 100,000 square feet of space on three levels. In March
2009, the Company relocated its supplies and returns-to-vendor departments
within the headquarters facilities and began an expansion of the current online
fulfillment infrastructure. The expansion, taking place within the
existing building, will approximately double the space available for the online
store as well as provide certain enhanced functionality.
The
Company also renovated space within its corporate headquarters during fiscal
2008 to add additional office space and is currently in the process of
evaluating the ability of its current distribution center to support the
anticipated growth of the business over the next several years.
Store
Locations and Expansion Strategies
As of
March 13, 2009, the Company operated 391 stores in 40 states, including 4 stores
opened during fiscal 2009. The existing stores are in 4 downtown
locations, 9 strip centers, 35 lifestyle centers, and 343 shopping
malls. The Company anticipates opening approximately 21 new stores in
fiscal 2009. For fiscal 2009, 18 of the new stores are expected to be
located in higher traffic shopping malls and 3 of the new stores are expected to
be located in lifestyle centers. The following table lists the
location of existing stores as of March 13, 2009:
Location of Stores | ||||||||||
State
|
Number of
Stores
|
State
|
Number of
Stores
|
State
|
Number of
Stores
|
|||||
Alabama
|
7
|
Maryland
|
3
|
Oregon
|
4
|
|||||
Arizona
|
9
|
Michigan
|
18
|
Pennsylvania
|
8
|
|||||
Arkansas
|
6
|
Minnesota
|
12
|
South
Carolina
|
3
|
|||||
California
|
18
|
Mississippi
|
5
|
South
Dakota
|
3
|
|||||
Colorado
|
13
|
Missouri
|
12
|
Tennessee
|
11
|
|||||
Florida
|
17
|
Montana
|
5
|
Texas
|
42
|
|||||
Georgia
|
5
|
Nebraska
|
13
|
Utah
|
11
|
|||||
Idaho
|
6
|
Nevada
|
3
|
Virginia
|
3
|
|||||
Illinois
|
16
|
New
Mexico
|
4
|
Washington
|
12
|
|||||
Indiana
|
14
|
New
York
|
1
|
West
Virginia
|
3
|
|||||
Iowa
|
18
|
North
Carolina
|
8
|
Wisconsin
|
13
|
|||||
Kansas
|
17
|
North
Dakota
|
3
|
Wyoming
|
1
|
|||||
Kentucky
Louisiana
|
5
9
|
Ohio
Oklahoma
|
17
13
|
Total
|
391
|
The
Buckle has grown significantly over the past ten years, with the number of
stores increasing from 222 at the beginning of 1999 to 387 at the end of fiscal
2008. The Company's plan is to continue expansion by developing the
geographic regions it currently serves and by expanding into contiguous
markets. The Company intends to open new stores only when management
believes there is a reasonable expectation of satisfactory results.
7
The
following table sets forth information regarding store openings and closings
from the beginning of fiscal 1999 through the end of fiscal 2008:
Total
Number of Stores Per Year
|
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal
Year
|
Open
at start
of
year
|
Opened
in
Current
Year
|
Closed
in
Current
Year
|
Open
at end
of
year
|
||||||||||||
1999
|
222 | 27 | 1 | 248 | ||||||||||||
2000
|
248 | 28 | 2 | 274 | ||||||||||||
2001
|
274 | 24 | 3 | 295 | ||||||||||||
2002
|
295 | 11 | 2 | 304 | ||||||||||||
2003
|
304 | 16 | 4 | 316 | ||||||||||||
2004
|
316 | 13 | 2 | 327 | ||||||||||||
2005
|
327 | 15 | 4 | 338 | ||||||||||||
2006
|
338 | 17 | 5 | 350 | ||||||||||||
2007
|
350 | 20 | 2 | 368 | ||||||||||||
2008
|
368 | 21 | 2 | 387 |
The
Company's criteria used when considering a particular location for expansion
include:
1.
|
Market
area, including proximity to existing markets to capitalize on name
recognition;
|
2.
|
Trade
area population (number, average age, and college
population);
|
3.
|
Economic
vitality of market area;
|
4.
|
Mall
location, anchor tenants, tenant mix, and average sales per square
foot;
|
5.
|
Available
location within a mall, square footage, storefront width, and facility of
using the current store design;
|
6.
|
Availability
of experienced management personnel for the
market;
|
7.
|
Cost
of rent, including minimum rent, common area, and extra
charges;
|
8.
|
Estimated
construction costs, including landlord charge backs and tenant
allowances.
|
The
Company generally seeks sites of 4,250 to 5,000 square feet for its
stores. The projected cost of opening a store is approximately
$944,000, including construction costs of approximately $714,000 (prior to any
construction allowance received) and inventory costs of approximately $230,000,
net of accounts payable.
The
Company anticipates opening approximately 21 new stores during fiscal 2009 and
completing approximately 20 remodels. Remodels range from partial to
full, with construction costs for a full remodel being comparable to those of a
new store. Of the stores scheduled for remodeling during fiscal 2009,
it is estimated that all stores will receive full remodeling. The
Company anticipates spending approximately $44 to $48 million for new store
construction, remodeling, technology upgrades, and improvements at the corporate
headquarters during fiscal 2009.
The
Company plans to expand in 2009 by opening stores in existing markets as well as
adding new stores in New York and New Jersey, which will represent the Company’s
40th
and 41st
states. The Company believes that, given the time required for
training personnel, staffing a store, and developing adequate district and
regional managers, its current management infrastructure is sufficient to
support its currently planned rate of growth.
The
Company's ability to expand in the future will depend, in part, on general
business conditions, the ability to find suitable malls with acceptable sites on
satisfactory terms, the availability of financing, and the readiness of trained
store managers. There can be no assurance that the Company's
expansion plans will be fulfilled in whole or in part, or that leases under
negotiation for planned new sites will be obtained on terms favorable to the
Company.
Management
Information Systems
The
Company's management information systems (MIS) and electronic data processing
systems (EDP) consist of a full range of retail, financial, and merchandising
systems, including purchasing, inventory distribution and control, sales
reporting, accounts payable, and merchandise management.
8
The
system includes PC based point-of-sale (POS) registers in each
store. These registers are polled nightly by the central computer
(IBM iSeries) using a virtual private network for collection of comprehensive
data, including complete item-level sales information, employee time clocking,
merchandise transfers and receipts, special orders, supply orders, and
returns-to-vendor. In conjunction with the nightly polling, the central computer
sends the PC server messages from various departments at the Company
headquarters and price changes for the price lookup (PLU) file maintained within
the POS registers.
Each
weekday morning, the Company initiates an electronic "sweep" of the individual
store bank accounts to the Company's primary concentration
account. This allows the Company to meet its obligations with a
minimum of borrowing and invest cash on a timely basis.
Management
monitors the performance of each of its stores on a continual
basis. Daily information is used to evaluate inventory, determine
markdowns, analyze profitability, and assist management in the scheduling and
compensation of employees.
The PLU
system allows management to control merchandise pricing centrally, permitting
faster and more accurate processing of sales at the store and the monitoring of
specific inventory items to confirm that centralized pricing decisions are
carried out in each of the stores. Management is able to direct all
price changes, including promotional, clearance, and markdowns on a central
basis and estimate the financial impact of such changes.
The
virtual private network for communication with the stores also supports the
Company’s intranet site. The intranet allows stores to view various
types of information from the corporate office. Stores also have
access to a variety of tools such as a product search with pictures, product
availability, special order functions, printable forms, links to transmit
various requests and information to the corporate office, training videos,
email, and information/guidelines from each of the departments at the corporate
office. The Company’s network is also structured so that it can
support additional functionality such as digital video monitoring and digital
music content programming at each store location.
The
Company is committed to the ongoing review of its MIS and EDP systems to
maintain productive, timely information and effective controls. This
review includes testing of new products and systems to assure that the Company
is aware of technological developments. Most important, continual
feedback is sought from every level of the Company to assure that information
provided is pertinent to all aspects of the Company's
operations. During fiscal 2009, the company will evaluate its
Point-of-Sale systems, including software and hardware, and anticipates testing
of systems during the year.
Employees
As of
January 31, 2009, the Company had approximately 8,225 employees - approximately
1,702 of whom were full-time. The Company has an experienced
management team and substantially all of the management team, from store
managers through senior management, began work for the Company on the sales
floor. The Company experiences high turnover of store and
distribution center employees, primarily due to the number of part-time
employees. However, the Company has not experienced significant
difficulty in hiring qualified personnel. Of the total employees,
approximately 540 are employed at the corporate headquarters and in the
distribution center. None of the Company's employees are represented
by a union. Management believes that employee relations are
good.
The
Company provides medical, dental, life insurance, and long-term disability
plans, as well as a 401(k) and a section 125 cafeteria plan for eligible
employees. An employee must be at least 20 years of age and work a
minimum of 1,000 hours during the plan year to be eligible for the 401(k)
plan. To be eligible for the plans, other than the 401(k) Plan, an
employee must have worked for the Company for 98 days or more, and his or her
normal workweek must be 35 hours or more. As of January 31, 2009,
1,427 employees participated in the medical plan, 1,432 in the dental plan,
1,702 in the life insurance plan, 406 in the supplemental life insurance plan,
1,202 in the long-term disability plan, and 1,013 in the cafeteria
plan. With respect to the medical, dental, and life insurance plans,
the Company pays 80% to 100% of the employee's expected premium cost plus 20% to
100% of the expected cost of dependent coverage under the health
plan. The exact percentage is based upon the employee's term of
employment and job classification within the Company. In addition,
all employees receive discounts on Company merchandise.
9
Competition
The men's
and women's apparel industries are highly competitive with fashion, selection,
quality, price, location, store environment, and service being the principal
competitive factors. While the Company believes it is able to compete
favorably with other merchandisers, including department stores and specialty
retailers, with respect to each of these factors, the Company believes it
competes mainly on the basis of customer service and merchandise
selection.
In the
men's merchandise area, the Company competes primarily with specialty retailers
such as Abercrombie & Fitch, American Eagle Outfitters, Hollister, Hot
Topic, Gap, Pacific Sunwear, and Metropark. The men's market also
competes with certain department stores, such as Dillards, Federated stores,
Parisian, Saks, Bon-Ton stores, and other local or regional department stores
and specialty retailers, as well as with mail order and internet
retailers.
In the
women's merchandise area, the Company competes primarily with specialty
retailers such as Abercrombie & Fitch, American Eagle Outfitters, Express,
Aeropostale, Hollister, Gap, Maurices, Pacific Sunwear, Wet Seal, Forever 21,
Vanity, and Metropark. The women's market also competes with
department stores, such as Dillards, Federated stores, Parisian, Saks, Bon-Ton
stores, and certain local or regional department stores and specialty retailers,
as well as with mail order and internet retailers.
Many of
the Company's competitors are considerably larger and have substantially greater
financial, marketing, and other resources than the Company, and there is no
assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully with them in the
future. Furthermore, while the Company believes it competes
effectively for favorable site locations and lease terms, competition for prime
locations within a mall is intense.
Trademarks
"BUCKLE”,
“RECLAIM”, “BKE”, and "THE BUCKLE" are federally registered trademarks of the
Company. The Company believes the strength of its trademarks is of
considerable value to its business, and its trademarks are important to its
marketing efforts. The Company intends to protect and promote its
trademarks as management deems appropriate.
Executive
Officers of the Company
The
Executive Officers of the Company are listed below, together with brief accounts
of their experience and certain other information.
Daniel J. Hirschfeld, age
67. Mr. Hirschfeld is Chairman of the Board of the
Company. He has served as Chairman of the Board since April 19,
1991. Prior to that time, Mr. Hirschfeld served as President and
Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hirschfeld has been involved in all
aspects of the Company's business, including the development of the Company's
management information systems.
Dennis H. Nelson, age
59. Mr. Nelson is President and Chief Executive Officer and a
Director of the Company. He has held the titles of President and
Director since April 19, 1991. Mr. Nelson was elected Chief Executive
Officer on March 17, 1997. Mr. Nelson began his career with the
Company in 1970 as a part-time salesman while he was attending Kearney State
College (now the University of Nebraska - Kearney). While attending
college, he became involved in merchandising and sales supervision for the
Company. Upon graduation from college in 1973, Mr. Nelson became a
full-time employee of the Company and he has worked in all phases of the
Company's operations since that date. Prior to his election as
President and Chief Operating Officer on April 19, 1991, Mr. Nelson performed
all of the functions normally associated with those positions.
Karen B. Rhoads, age
50. Ms. Rhoads is the Vice President of Finance, Treasurer,
Chief Financial Officer, and a Director of the Company. Ms. Rhoads
was elected a Director on April 19, 1991. She worked in the corporate
offices while attending Kearney State College (now the University of Nebraska -
Kearney) and later worked part-time on the sales floor. Ms. Rhoads
practiced as a CPA for 6 1/2 years, during which time she began working on tax
and accounting matters for the Company as a client. She has been
employed with the Buckle since November 1987.
10
Brett P. Milkie, age
49. Mr. Milkie is Vice President of Leasing. He was
elected Vice President of Leasing on May 30, 1996. Mr. Milkie was a
leasing agent for a national retail mall developer for 6 years prior to joining
the Company in January 1992 as Director of Leasing.
Kari G. Smith, age
45. Ms. Smith is Vice President of Sales. She has
held this position since May 31, 2001. Ms. Smith joined the Company
May 16, 1978 as a part-time salesperson. Later she became store
manager in Great Bend, KS and then began working with other stores as an area
manager. Ms. Smith has continued to develop her involvement with the
sales management team, helping with manager meetings and the development of new
store managers, as well as providing support for store managers, area managers,
and district managers.
Patricia K. Whisler, age
52. Ms.
Whisler is Vice President of Women’s Merchandising. She has held this
position since May 31, 2001. Ms. Whisler joined the Company in
February 1976 as a part-time salesperson and later became manager of a Buckle
store before returning to the corporate office in 1983 to work as part of the
growing merchandising team.
Kyle L. Hanson, age
44. Ms. Hanson is the Corporate Secretary and General
Counsel. She has held this position since February
2001. Ms. Hanson joined the Company in May 1998 as General
Counsel. She also worked for the Company as a part-time salesperson
while attending Kearney State College (now the University of Nebraska -
Kearney). Ms. Hanson was previously First Vice President and Trial
Attorney for Mutual of Omaha Companies for 2 years and an attorney with Kutak
Rock law firm in Omaha from 1990 to 1996.
Robert M. Carlberg, age
46. Mr. Carlberg is Vice President of Men’s
Merchandising. He has held this position since December 11,
2006. Mr. Carlberg started with the Company as a salesperson and also
worked as a store manager and as an area and district leader while being
involved and traveling with the Men’s Merchandising team. He has been
full-time with the merchandising team since January 2001.
ITEM
1A – RISK FACTORS
Cautionary
Statement Pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and
Risk Factors
Certain
statements herein, including anticipated store openings, trends in or
expectations regarding The Buckle, Inc.’s revenue and net earnings growth,
comparable store sales growth, cash flow requirements, and capital expenditures,
all constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based
on currently available operating, financial, and competitive information and are
subject to various risks and uncertainties. Actual future results and
trends may differ materially depending on a variety of factors, including, but
not limited to, changes in product mix, changes in fashion trends and/or
pricing, competitive factors, general economic conditions, economic conditions
in the retail apparel industry, successful execution of internal performance and
expansion plans, and other risks detailed herein and in The Buckle, Inc.’s other
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
A
forward-looking statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of future
events or circumstances, and those future events or circumstances may not
occur. Users should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking
statements, which are accurate only as of the date of this
report. The Company is under no obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events, or otherwise. In management’s judgment, the following are
material risk factors:
Dependence on Merchandising/Fashion
Sensitivity. The Company’s success is largely dependent upon
its ability to gauge the fashion tastes of its customers and to provide
merchandise that satisfies customer demand in a timely manner. The
Company’s failure to anticipate, identify, or react appropriately and timely to
the changes in fashion trends would reduce the Company’s net sales and
profitability. Misjudgments or unanticipated fashion changes could
have a negative impact on the Company’s image with its customers, which would
also reduce the Company’s net sales and profitability.
11
Dependence on Private Label
Merchandise. Sales from private label merchandise accounted
for approximately 28% of net sales for fiscal 2008 and 30% of net sales for
fiscal 2007. The Company may increase or decrease the percentage of
net sales from private label merchandise in the future. The Company’s
private label products generally earn a higher margin than branded
product. Thus, reductions in the private label mix would decrease the
Company’s merchandise margins and, as a result, reduce net
earnings.
Fluctuations in Comparable Store Net
Sales Results. The Company’s comparable store net sales
results have fluctuated in the past and are expected to continue to fluctuate in
the future. A variety of factors affect comparable store sales
results, including changes in fashion trends, changes in the Company’s
merchandise mix, calendar shifts of holiday periods, actions by competitors,
weather conditions, and general economic conditions. As a result of
these or other factors, the Company’s future comparable store sales could
decrease, reducing overall net sales and profitability.
Ability to Continue Expansion and
Management of Growth. The Buckle, Inc.’s continued growth
depends on its ability to open and operate stores on a profitable basis and
management’s ability to manage planned expansion. During fiscal 2009,
the Company plans to open 21 new stores. This expansion is dependent
upon factors such as the ability to locate and obtain favorable store sites,
negotiate acceptable lease terms, obtain necessary merchandise, and hire and
train qualified management and other employees. There may be factors
outside of the Company’s control that affect the ability to expand, including
general economic conditions. There is no assurance that the Company
will be able to achieve its planned expansion or that such expansion will be
profitable. If the Company fails to manage its store growth, there
would be less growth in the Company’s net sales from new stores and less growth
in profitability. If the Company opened unprofitable store locations,
there could be a reduction in net earnings, even with the resulting growth in
the Company’s net sales.
Reliance on Key
Personnel. The continued success of The Buckle, Inc. is
dependent to a significant degree on the continued service of key personnel,
including senior management. The loss of a member of senior
management could create additional expense in covering their position as well as
cause a reduction in net sales, thus reducing net earnings. The
Company’s success in the future will also be dependent upon the Company’s
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. The Company’s failure to
attract and retain qualified personnel could reduce the number of new stores the
Company could open in a year which would cause net sales to decline, could
create additional operating expenses, and could reduce overall profitability for
the Company.
Dependence on a Single Distribution
Facility and Third-Party Carriers. The distribution function
for all of the Company’s stores is handled from a single facility in Kearney,
Nebraska. Any significant interruption in the operation of the
distribution facility due to natural disasters, system failures, or other
unforeseen causes would impede the distribution of merchandise to the stores,
causing a decline in store inventory, a reduction in store sales, and a
reduction in Company profitability. Interruptions in service by
common carriers could also delay shipment of goods to Company store
locations. Additionally, there can be no assurance that the current
facilities will be adequate to support the Company’s future growth.
Reliance on Foreign Sources of
Production. The Company purchases a portion of its private
label merchandise through sourcing agents in foreign markets. In
addition, some of the Company’s domestic vendors manufacture goods
overseas. The Company does not have any long-term merchandise supply
contracts and its imports are subject to existing or potential duties, tariffs,
and quotas. The Company faces a variety of risks associated with
doing business overseas including competition for facilities and quotas,
political instability, possible new legislation relating to imports that could
limit the quantity of merchandise that may be imported, imposition of duties,
taxes, and other charges on imports, and local business practice and political
issues which may result in adverse publicity. The Company’s
inability to rely on foreign sources of production due to these or other causes
could reduce the amount of inventory the Company is able to purchase, hold up
the timing on the receipt of new merchandise, and reduce merchandise margins if
comparable inventory is purchased from branded sources. Any or all of
these changes would cause a decrease in the Company’s net sales and net
earnings.
12
Dependence upon Maintaining Sales and
Profit Growth in the Highly Competitive Retail Apparel
Industry. The specialty retail industry is highly
competitive. The Company competes primarily on the basis of fashion,
selection, quality, price, location, service, and store
environment. The Company faces a variety of competitive challenges,
including:
· anticipating
and responding timely to changing customer demands and preferences;
|
·
|
effectively
marketing both branded and private label merchandise to consumers in
several diverse market segments and maintaining favorable brand
recognition;
|
|
·
|
providing
unique, high-quality merchandise in styles, colors, and sizes that appeal
to consumers;
|
· sourcing
merchandise efficiently;
· competitively
pricing merchandise and creating customer perception of value;
· monitoring
increased labor costs, including increases in health care benefits and worker’s
compensation costs.
There is
no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully in the
future.
Reliance on Consumer Spending
Trends. The continued success of the Company depends, in part,
upon numerous factors that impact the levels of individual disposable income and
thus, consumer spending. Factors include the political environment,
economic conditions, employment, consumer debt, interest rates, inflation, and
consumer confidence. A decline in consumer spending, for any reason,
could have an adverse effect on the Company’s net sales, gross profits, and
results from operations.
Modifications and/or Upgrades to
Information Technology Systems May Disrupt Operations. The
Company relies upon its various information systems to manage its operations and
regularly evaluates its information technology in order for management to
identify investment opportunities for maintaining, modifying, upgrading, or
replacing these systems. There are inherent risks associated with
replacing or changing these systems. Any delays, errors in capturing
data, or difficulties in transitioning to these or other new systems, or in
integrating these systems with the Company’s current systems, or any other
disruptions affecting the Company’s information systems, could have a material
adverse impact on the Company’s business.
Market/Liquidity Risk Related to the
Company’s Investments. In prior years, the Company invested a
portion of its investments in auction-rate securities (“ARS”), including one ARS
that was converted to preferred stock prior to January 31, 2009. As
of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, $30.9 million and $145.8 million,
respectively, of investments were in ARS and preferred
securities. ARS have a long-term stated maturity, but are reset
through a “dutch auction” process that occurs every 7 to 49 days, depending on
the terms of the individual security. Until February 2008, the ARS
market was highly liquid. During February 2008, however, a
significant number of auctions related to these securities failed, meaning that
there was not enough demand to sell the entire issue at auction. The
failed auctions have limited the liquidity of the Company’s investments in ARS,
and the Company believes that certain of the underlying issuers of its ARS are
currently at risk. Further auction failures could have a material impact on
Company’s earnings; however, the Company does not believe further auction
failures would have a material impact on its ability to fund its
business.
The
Company reviews impairment in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
03-1 and FSP SFAS 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment and its Application to Certain
Investments, to determine the classification of potential impairments as
either temporary or other-than-temporary. A temporary impairment
results in an unrealized loss being recorded in other comprehensive
income. An impairment that is considered other-than-temporary would
be recognized in net income. The Company considers various factors in
reviewing impairment, including the length of time and extent to which the fair
value has been less than the Company’s cost basis, the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuer, and the Company’s intent and ability to hold
the investments for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated
recovery in market value. The Company believes it has the ability and
maintains its intent to hold its investments until recovery of market value
occurs.
13
The
Company’s investments in ARS are reported at fair market value, and as of
January 31, 2009, the reported investment amount is net of a $1.5 million
temporary impairment and a $5.2 million other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”)
recorded during fiscal 2008 to account for the impairment of certain securities
from their stated par value. The Company reported the $1.5 million
temporary impairment, net of tax, as an “accumulated other comprehensive loss”
of $0.9 million in stockholders’ equity as of January 31, 2009. The
Company has accounted for the impairment as temporary, as it currently expects
to be able to successfully liquidate its investments without loss once the ARS
market resumes normal operations. The Company reported the $5.2
million OTTI ($3.2 million, net of tax) as a loss in the statement of income for
the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009. The Company was able to
successfully liquidate $112.9 million of its investments in ARS at par value
during fiscal 2008.
The
Company reviews all investments for OTTI at least quarterly or as indicators of
impairment exist. Indicators of impairment include the duration and
severity of the decline in market value. In addition, the Company
considers qualitative factors including, but not limited to, the financial
condition of the investee, the credit rating of the investee, and the current
and expected market and industry conditions in which the investee
operates. Given current market conditions in the ARS market, the
Company may incur additional temporary impairment or OTTI in the future if
market conditions persist and the Company is unable to recover the cost of its
investments in ARS.
Interest Rate
Risk. To the extent that the Company borrows under its line of
credit facility, the Company would be exposed to market risk related to changes
in interest rates. As of January 31, 2009, no borrowings were
outstanding under its line of credit facility. The Company is also
exposed to market risk related to interest rate risk on its cash and investments
in interest-bearing securities. These investments have carrying
values that are subject to interest rate changes that could impact earnings to
the extent that the Company did not hold the investments to
maturity. If there are changes in interest rates, those changes would
also affect the investment income the Company earns on its cash and investments.
For each one-quarter percent decline in the interest/dividend rate earned on
cash and investments (approximately a 25% change in the rate earned), the
Company’s net income would decrease approximately $390,000, or approximately
$0.01 per share. This amount could vary based upon the number of
shares of the Company’s stock outstanding and the level of cash and investments
held by the Company.
The
company cautions that the risk factors described above could cause actual
results to vary materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking
statements made by or on behalf of the Company. Management cannot
assess the impact of each factor on the Company’s business or the extent to
which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to vary
from those contained in forward-looking statements.
ITEM
1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
14
ITEM
2 - PROPERTIES
All of
the store locations operated by the Company are leased
facilities. Most of the Company's stores have lease terms of
approximately ten years and generally do not contain renewal
options. In the past, the Company has not experienced problems
renewing its leases, although no assurance can be given that the Company can
renew existing leases on favorable terms. The Company seeks to
negotiate extensions on leases for stores undergoing remodeling to provide terms
of approximately ten years after completion of remodeling. Consent of
the landlord generally is required to remodel or change the name under which the
Company does business. The Company has not experienced problems in
obtaining such consent in the past. Most leases provide for a fixed
minimum rental cost plus an additional rental cost based upon a set percentage
of sales beyond a specified breakpoint, plus common area and other
charges. The current terms of the Company's leases, including
automatic renewal options, expiring on or before January 31st of each
year is as follows:
Year
|
Number
of expiring
leases
|
|||
2010
|
85 | |||
2011
|
60 | |||
2012
|
42 | |||
2013
|
28 | |||
2014
|
38 | |||
2015
|
15 | |||
2016
|
25 | |||
2017
and later
|
98 | |||
Total
|
391 |
The
corporate headquarters and distribution center for the Company are located
within a facility purchased by the Company in 1988, which is located in Kearney,
Nebraska. The building currently provides approximately 261,200
square feet of space, which includes approximately 82,200 square feet related to
the Company’s 2005 addition. The Company also owns a 40,000 square
foot building with warehouse and office space near the corporate
headquarters. This building houses the Company’s screenprinting
operations. The Company also acquired the lease, with favorable
terms, on the land the building is built upon. The lease is currently
in the second of ten five-year renewal options, which expires on October 31,
2011.
ITEM
3 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time
to time, the Company is involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of
its operations in the normal course of business. As of the date of
this form, the Company was not engaged in legal proceedings that are expected,
individually or in the aggregate, to have a material effect on the
Company.
ITEM
4 - SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There
were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2008.
15
PART
II
ITEM
5 - MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS, AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The
Company’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
BKE. Prior to the Company’s initial public offering on May 6, 1992,
there was no public market for the Company’s common stock.
Dividend
Payments
During
fiscal 2006, cash dividends were $0.0756 per share in the first and second
quarters, $0.0889 per share in the third quarter, and $0.1333 per share in the
fourth quarter. In addition, the Company paid a special one-time cash
dividend of $1.3333 per share in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2006. During fiscal 2007, cash dividends were $0.1333 per share in
the first and second quarters and $0.1667 per share in the third and fourth
quarters. During fiscal 2008, cash dividends were $0.1667 per share
in the first and second quarters and $0.20 per share in the third and fourth
quarters. In addition, the Company paid a special one-time cash
dividend of $2.00 per share in the third quarter of fiscal
2008. Dividend amounts prior to the Company's 3-for-2 stock split
with distribution date of January 12, 2007 and 3-for-2 stock split with
distribution date of October 30, 2008, have been adjusted to reflect the impact
of these stock splits. The Company plans to continue its quarterly
dividends during fiscal 2009.
Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
The
following table sets forth information concerning purchases made by the Company
of its common stock for each of the months in the fiscal quarter ended January
31, 2009:
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
|
Average
Price
Paid
Per
Share
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans
|
Approximate
Number
of Shares Yet To
Be
Purchased Under
Publicly
Announced Plans
|
|||||||||||||
Nov.
2, 2008 to Nov. 29, 2008
|
356,400 | $ | 16.14 | 356,400 | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||
Nov.
30, 2008 to Jan. 3, 2009
|
200,000 | $ | 17.84 | 200,000 | 800,000 | |||||||||||
Jan.
4, 2009 to Jan. 31, 2009
|
700 | $ | 19.91 | 700 | 799,300 | |||||||||||
557,100 | $ | 16.76 | 557,100 |
Of
the shares repurchased, 356,400 were purchased pursuant to the 750,000
share corporate stock repurchase program authorized by the Board of
Directors on November 27, 2007, completing that
authorization. The Board of Directors authorized a 1,000,000
share repurchase plan on November 20, 2008. The Company has
799,300 shares remaining to complete this
authorization.
|
16
Stock Price Performance
Graph
The graph
below compares the cumulative total return on common shares of the Company for
the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total return on the Russell 2000
Stock Index and a peer group of Retail Trade Stocks.
Total
Return Analysis
2/1/2004
|
1/29/2005
|
1/28/2006
|
2/3/2007
|
2/2/2008
|
1/31/2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The
Buckle, Inc.
|
$ | 100.00 | $ | 112.86 | $ | 141.38 | $ | 217.67 | $ | 275.88 | $ | 232.48 | ||||||||||||
New
Peer Group
|
$ | 100.00 | $ | 133.87 | $ | 133.96 | $ | 159.38 | $ | 139.12 | $ | 65.63 | ||||||||||||
Russell
2000 Index
|
$ | 100.00 | $ | 107.45 | $ | 126.25 | $ | 137.81 | $ | 122.82 | $ | 76.37 |
The
following table lists the Company’s quarterly market range for fiscal years
2008, 2007, and 2006, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, and has been
adjusted to reflect the 3-for-2 stock splits, effected in the form of stock
dividends, on each of January 12, 2007 and October 30, 2008:
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
January
31, 2009
|
February
2, 2008
|
February
3, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter
|
High
|
Low
|
High
|
Low
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||||||||||||||
First
|
$ | 33.67 | $ | 24.72 | $ | 24.91 | $ | 21.63 | $ | 19.11 | $ | 15.32 | ||||||||||||
Second | 35.98 | 29.03 | 27.63 | 22.71 | 19.26 | 16.69 | ||||||||||||||||||
Third
|
44.57 | 21.08 | 29.14 | 21.46 | 17.78 | 14.83 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fourth
|
27.20 | 13.57 | 28.90 | 20.03 | 24.43 | 16.83 |
The
number of record holders of the Company’s common stock as of March 26, 2009 was
396. Based upon information from the principal market makers, the
Company believes there are approximately 4,500 beneficial owners. The
closing price of the Company’s common stock on March 26, 2009 was
$32.31.
Additional
information required by this item appears in the Notes to Financial Statements
under Footnote J "Stock-Based Compensation" on pages 48 to 51 of this report and
is incorporated by reference.
17
ITEM
6 - SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts
in Thousands Except Share, Per Share Amounts, and Selected
Operating
Data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal
Years Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||
January
31,
|
February
2,
|
February
3,
|
January
28,
|
January
29,
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007 (d)
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||
Income
Statement Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 792,046 | $ | 619,888 | $ | 530,074 | $ | 501,101 | $ | 470,937 | ||||||||||
Cost
of sales (including buying, distribution, and occupancy
costs)
|
448,558 | 365,350 | 322,760 | 307,063 | 299,958 | |||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
343,488 | 254,538 | 207,314 | 194,038 | 170,979 | |||||||||||||||
Selling
expenses
|
151,251 | 118,699 | 107,592 | 100,148 | 89,008 | |||||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
30,041 | 26,212 | 20,701 | 17,568 | 18,599 | |||||||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
162,196 | 109,627 | 79,021 | 76,322 | 63,372 | |||||||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
7,829 | 9,183 | 9,032 | 6,123 | 4,470 | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on securities
|
(5,157 | ) | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
164,868 | 118,810 | 88,053 | 82,445 | 67,842 | |||||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
60,459
|
43,563
|
32,327 | 30,539 | 24,613 | |||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 104,409 | $ | 75,247 | $ | 55,726 | $ | 51,906 | $ | 43,229 | ||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 2.30 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 1.29 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 0.90 | ||||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 2.24 | $ | 1.63 | $ | 1.24 | $ | 1.13 | $ | 0.86 | ||||||||||
Dividends
declared per share (a)
|
$ | 2.73 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 1.71 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.20 | ||||||||||
Selected
Operating Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Stores
open at end of period
|
387 | 368 | 350 | 338 | 327 | |||||||||||||||
Average
sales per square foot
|
$ | 401 | $ | 335 | $ | 302 | $ | 298 | $ | 291 | ||||||||||
Average
sales per store (000's)
|
$ | 1,995 | $ | 1,668 | $ | 1,493 | $ | 1,474 | $ | 1,454 | ||||||||||
Comparable
store sales change (b)
|
20.6 | % | 13.2 | % | 0.0 | % | 1.4 | % | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||
Balance Sheet
Data (c)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Working
capital
|
$ | 197,539 | $ | 184,395 | $ | 189,017 | $ | 193,428 | $ | 219,231 | ||||||||||
Long-term
investments
|
$ | 56,213 | $ |
81,201
|
$ | 31,958 | $ | 41,654 | $ | 54,395 | ||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 465,340 | $ |
450,657
|
$ | 368,198 | $ | 374,266 | $ | 405,543 | ||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
$ | 337,222 | $ | 338,320 | $ | 286,587 | $ | 299,793 | $ | 332,928 |
(a)
During fiscal 2004, the Company paid cash dividends of $0.0444 per share in the
first and second quarters and $0.0533 per share in the third and fourth
quarters. During fiscal 2005, cash dividends were $0.0533 per share in the first
quarter, $0.0667 per share in the second quarter, and $0.0756 per share in the
third and fourth quarters. During fiscal 2006, cash dividends were $0.0756 per
share in the first and second quarters, $0.0889 per share in the third quarter,
and $0.1333 per share in the fourth quarter. In addition, the Company paid a
special one-time cash dividend of $1.3333 per share in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2006. During fiscal 2007, cash dividends were $0.1333 per share in the
first and second quarters and $0.1667 per share in the third and fourth
quarters. During fiscal 2008, cash dividends were $0.1667 per share in the first
and second quarters and $0.20 per share in the third and fourth quarters. In
addition, the Company paid a special one-time cash dividend of $2.00 per share
in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Dividend amounts prior to the Company's
3-for-2 stock split with distribution date of January 12, 2007 and 3-for-2 stock
split with distribution date of October 30, 2008, have been adjusted to reflect
the impact of these stock splits.
(b)
Stores are deemed to be comparable stores if they were open in the prior year on
the first day of the fiscal period presented. Stores which have been remodeled,
expanded, and/or relocated, but would otherwise be included as comparable
stores, are not excluded from the comparable store sales calculation. Online
sales are excluded from comparable store sales.
(c) At
the end of the period.
(d) Consists
of 53 weeks.
18
ITEM
7 - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and notes thereto of the Company included in this Form 10-K. The
following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors
which have affected the Company’s financial condition and results of operations
during the periods included in the accompanying financial statements included in
this Form 10-K.
EXECUTIVE
OVERVIEW
Company
management considers the following items to be key performance indicators in
evaluating Company performance.
Comparable Store Sales –
Stores are deemed to be comparable stores if they were open in the prior year on
the first day of the fiscal period being presented. Stores which have
been remodeled, expanded, and/or relocated, but would otherwise be included as
comparable stores, are not excluded from the comparable store sales
calculation. Online sales are excluded from comparable store
sales. Management considers comparable store sales to be an important
indicator of current Company performance, helping leverage certain fixed costs
when results are positive. Negative comparable store sales results
could reduce net sales and have a negative impact on operating leverage, thus
reducing net earnings.
Net Merchandise Margins –
Management evaluates the components of merchandise margin including initial
markup and the amount of markdowns during a period. Any inability to
obtain acceptable levels of initial markups or any significant increase in the
Company’s use of markdowns could have an adverse effect on the Company’s gross
margin and results of operations.
Operating Margin – Operating
margin is a good indicator for management of the Company’s
success. Operating margin can be positively or negatively affected by
comparable store sales, merchandise margins, occupancy costs, and the Company’s
ability to control operating costs.
Cash Flow and Liquidity (working
capital) - Management reviews current cash and short-term investments
along with cash flow from operating, investing, and financing activities to
determine the Company’s short-term cash needs for operations and
expansion. The Company believes that existing cash, short-term
investments, and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund current
and long-term anticipated capital expenditures and working capital requirements
for the next several years.
19
RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The
following table sets forth certain financial data expressed as a percentage of
net sales and the percentage change in the dollar amount of such items compared
to the prior period:
Percentage
of Net Sales
For
Fiscal Years Ended
|
Percentage
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
January
31,
2009
|
February
2,
2008
|
February
3,
2007
|
Fiscal
Year
2007
to 2008
|
Fiscal
Year
2006
to 2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 27.8 | % | 16.9 | % | ||||||||||
Cost
of sales (including buying,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
distribution,
and occupancy costs)
|
56.6 | % | 58.9 | % | 60.9 | % | 22.8 | % | 13.2 | % | ||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
43.4 | % | 41.1 | % | 39.1 | % | 34.9 | % | 22.8 | % | ||||||||||
Selling
expenses
|
19.1 | % | 19.1 | % | 20.3 | % | 27.4 | % | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 3.8 | % | 4.2 | % | 3.9 | % | 14.6 | % | 26.6 | % | ||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
20.5 | % | 17.7 | % | 14.9 | % | 48.0 | % | 38.7 | % | ||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
1.0 | % | 1.5 | % | 1.7 | % | (14.7 | )% | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on securities
|
(0.7 | )% | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
20.8 | % | 19.2 | % | 16.6 | % | 38.8 | % | 34.9 | % | ||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
7.6 | % | 7.0 | % | 6.1 | % | 38.8 | % | 34.8 | % | ||||||||||
Net
income
|
13.2 | % | 12.1 | % | 10.5 | % | 38.8 | % | 35.0 | % |
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
Net sales
for the 52-week fiscal year ended January 31, 2009, increased 27.8 percent to
$792.0 million from net sales of $619.9 million for the 52-week fiscal year
ended February 2, 2008. Comparable store net sales for the fiscal
year increased by $119.1 million, or 20.6%, in comparison to the 52-week year
ended February 2, 2008. The comparable store sales increase was
primarily due to an increase in the number of transactions at comparable stores
during the year, in addition to a 5.0% increase in the average retail price of
merchandise sold during the year and a 2.5% increase in the average number of
units sold per transaction. Sales growth for the fiscal year was also
attributable to the inclusion of a full year of operating results for the 20 new
stores opened during fiscal 2007, to the opening of 21 new stores during fiscal
2008, and to growth in online sales.
The
Company’s average retail price per piece of merchandise sold increased $2.06, or
5.0%, during fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. This $2.06 increase
was primarily attributable to the following changes (with their corresponding
effect on the overall average price per piece): an 11.3% increase in average
knit shirt price points ($1.35), a 7.1% increase in average denim price points
($1.19), a 12.7% increase in average woven shirt price points ($0.29), a 4.3%
increase in average accessory price points ($0.14), a 12.3% increase in average
sweater price points ($0.12), and increased average price points in certain
other categories ($0.10). These increases were partially offset by
the impact of a shift in the merchandise mix (-$1.13). These changes
are primarily a reflection of merchandise shifts in terms of brands and product
styles, fabrics, details, and finishes. Average sales per square foot
for fiscal 2008 increased 19.7% from $335 to $401.
Gross
profit after buying, distribution, and occupancy costs increased $88.9 million
in fiscal 2008 to $343.5 million, a 34.9% increase. As a percentage
of net sales, gross profit increased from 41.1% in fiscal 2007 to 43.4% in
fiscal 2008. The increase was primarily due to a 0.50% improvement,
as a percentage of net sales, in actual merchandise margins, which was achieved
through an increase in regular-price selling during the period that was
partially offset by an increase in Primo Card redemptions and a slight
reduction, as a percentage of net sales, in private label merchandise
sales. The increase was also attributable to a 1.90% reduction, as a
percentage of net sales, related to leveraged buying, distribution, and
occupancy costs. These improvements were partially offset by an
increase in expense related to the incentive bonus accrual (0.10%, as a
percentage of net sales). Merchandise shrinkage was flat at 0.50% of
net sales for both fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007.
20
Selling
expenses increased from $118.7 million in fiscal 2007 to $151.3 million in
fiscal 2008, a 27.4% increase. Selling expenses as a percentage of
net sales was 19.1% in both fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008. Increases
driven primarily by an increase in expense related to the incentive bonus
accrual (0.60%, as a percentage of net sales), an increase in internet related
fulfillment and marketing expenses (0.15%, as a percentage of net sales), and
investments made during the fourth quarter related to certain store fixtures and
supplies (0.20%, as a percentage of net sales) were offset by a 0.65% reduction,
as a percentage of net sales, in store payroll expense and a 0.30% reduction
related the leveraging of certain other selling expenses.
General
and administrative expenses increased from $26.2 million in fiscal 2007 to $30.0
million in fiscal 2008, a 14.6% increase. As a percentage of net
sales, general and administrative expenses decreased from 4.2% in fiscal 2007 to
3.8% in fiscal 2008. General and administrate expenses for fiscal
2008 are reported net of a $3.0 million gain from the involuntary conversion of
one of the Company’s corporate aircrafts to a monetary asset upon receipt of
$11.5 million in insurance proceeds. The aircraft was destroyed by a
tornado that hit the airport in Kearney, Nebraska on May 29,
2008. Excluding the $3.0 million gain recognized during the second
quarter of the fiscal year, general and administrative expenses were 4.2% of net
sales in both fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008. An increase in expense
related to the incentive bonus accrual (0.20%, as a percentage of net sales) was
offset by a 0.20% reduction, as a percentage of net sales, related to the
leveraging of certain other general and administrative expenses
As a
result of the above changes, the Company’s income from operations increased
$52.6 million to $162.2 million for fiscal 2008, a 48.0% increase compared to
fiscal 2007. Income from operations was 20.5% as a percentage of net
sales in fiscal 2008 compared to 17.7% as a percentage of net sales in fiscal
2007.
Other
income decreased from $9.2 million in fiscal 2007 to $7.8 million in fiscal
2008, a 14.7% decrease. The decrease in other income is due to a
reduction in income earned on the Company’s cash and investments, as a result of
lower interest rates.
Additionally,
as referenced in Note B to the financial statements, the Company recorded a
total of $5.2 million in unrealized losses during fiscal 2008 resulting from the
other-than-temporary impairment of certain of its investments in auction-rate
securities. The other-than-temporary impairment has been recorded as
a separate component in the statement of income for the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2009.
Income
tax expense as a percentage of pre-tax income was 36.7% in both fiscal 2007 and
fiscal 2008, bringing net income to $104.4 million in fiscal 2008 versus $75.2
million in fiscal 2007, an increase of 38.8%.
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Fiscal
2007 net sales, for the 52-week period ended February 2, 2008, increased 16.9
percent to $619.9 million from net sales of $530.1 million for the 53-week
fiscal year ended February 3, 2007. Comparable store net sales for
the fiscal year increased by $65.0 million, or 13.2%, in comparison to the
52-week period ended February 3, 2007. The comparable store sales
increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of transactions at
comparable stores during the year, a 2.7% increase in the average retail price
of merchandise sold during the year, and a slight increase in the average number
of units sold per transaction. Sales growth for the fiscal year was
also attributable to the inclusion of a full year of operating results for the
17 new stores opened during fiscal 2006, to the opening of 20 new stores during
fiscal 2007, and to growth in online sales. These increases were
partially offset by the inclusion of an extra week of sales in fiscal 2006, as a
result of the 53rd week in
the retail calendar.
The
Company’s average retail price per piece of merchandise sold increased $1.07, or
2.7%, during fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006. This $1.07 increase
was primarily attributable to the following changes (with their corresponding
effect on the overall average price per piece): an 11.0% increase in average
knit shirt price points ($1.09), a 5.4% increase in average denim price points
($0.92), and a 6.0% increase in average woven shirt price points
($0.15). These increases were partially offset by the impact of a
shift in the merchandise mix (-$0.76) and by reduced average price points in
certain other categories (including footwear and accessories). These
changes are primarily a reflection of merchandise shifts in terms of brands and
product styles, fabrics, details, and finishes. Average sales per
square foot for fiscal 2007 increased 10.9% from $302 to
$335.
21
Gross
profit after buying, distribution, and occupancy costs increased $47.2 million
in fiscal 2007 to $254.5 million, a 22.8% increase. As a percentage
of net sales, gross profit increased from 39.1% in fiscal 2006 to 41.1% in
fiscal 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to a 1.00%
improvement, as a percentage of net sales, in actual merchandise margins, which
was achieved through an increase in regular-price selling during the period that
was partially offset by a slight reduction, as a percentage of net sales, in
private label merchandise sales. The increase was also attributable
to a 1.20% reduction, as a percentage of net sales, related to leveraged buying,
distribution, and occupancy costs. These improvements were partially
offset by an increase in expense related to the incentive bonus accrual (0.20%,
as a percentage of net sales). Merchandise shrinkage decreased from
0.70% in fiscal 2006 to 0.50% in fiscal 2007.
Selling
expenses increased from $107.6 million in fiscal 2006 to $118.7 million in
fiscal 2007, a 10.3% increase. Selling expenses as a percentage of
net sales decreased from 20.3% for fiscal 2006 to 19.2% for fiscal
2007. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 0.65% reduction,
as a percentage of net sales, in store payroll expense, a 0.30% reduction in
stock option compensation expense, and a 0.25% reduction in advertising
expense. The Company also achieved a 0.50% reduction, as a percentage
of net sales, by leveraging certain other selling expenses. These
reductions were, however, partially offset by increases in expense related to
the incentive bonus accrual (0.40%, as a percentage of net sales), bankcard fees
(0.10%, as a percentage of net sales), and health insurance expense (0.10%, as a
percentage of net sales).
General
and administrative expenses increased from $20.7 million in fiscal 2006 to $26.2
million in fiscal 2007, a 26.6% increase. As a percentage of net
sales, general and administrative expenses increased from 3.9% for fiscal 2006
to 4.2% for fiscal 2007. The increase was driven primarily by
increases in expense related to the incentive bonus accrual (0.50%, as a
percentage of net sales) and equity compensation expense related to outstanding
shares of non-vested stock (0.10%, as a percentage of net
sales). These increases were partially offset by a 0.30% reduction,
as a percentage of net sales, related to the leveraging of certain other general
and administrative expenses.
As a
result of the above changes, the Company’s income from operations increased
$30.6 million to $109.6 million for fiscal 2007, a 38.7% increase compared to
fiscal 2006. Income from operations was 17.7% as a percentage of net
sales in fiscal 2007 compared to 14.9% as a percentage of net sales in fiscal
2006.
Other
income increased from $9.0 million in fiscal 2006 to $9.2 million in fiscal
2007, a 1.7% increase. The increase in other income is primarily due
to an increase in income earned on the Company’s cash and investments, resulting
from higher average balances of cash and investments, which was partially offset
by the impact of proceeds received during fiscal 2006 for Hurricane Katrina and
Hurricane Rita insurance claims and for the settlement of a lawsuit relating to
Visa/Mastercard interchange fees.
Income
tax expense as a percentage of pre-tax income was 36.7% in both fiscal 2007 and
fiscal 2006, bringing net income to $75.2 million for fiscal 2007 versus $55.7
million for fiscal 2006, an increase of 35.0%.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES
As of
January 31, 2009, the Company had working capital of $197.5 million, including
$162.5 million of cash and cash equivalents and $19.2 million of short-term
investments. The Company’s cash receipts are generated from retail
sales and from investment income, and the Company's primary ongoing cash
requirements are for inventory, payroll, occupancy costs, dividend payments, new
store expansion, remodeling, and other capital
expenditures. Historically, the Company’s primary source of working
capital has been cash flow from operations. During fiscal 2008, 2007,
and 2006 the Company's cash flow from operations was $143.7 million, $121.1
million, and $80.4 million, respectively.
The
Company has available an unsecured line of credit of $17.5 million with Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. for operating needs and letters of credit. The line
of credit provides that outstanding letters of credit cannot exceed $10
million. Borrowings under the line of credit provide for interest to
be paid at a rate equal to the prime rate established by the
Bank. The Company has, from time to time, borrowed against these
lines of credit. There were no borrowings during fiscal 2008, 2007,
and 2006. The Company had no bank borrowings as of January 31, 2009,
was in compliance with the terms and conditions of the line of credit agreement,
and does not anticipate any difficulties in renewing the line of credit during
fiscal 2009.
22
Dividend payments – During
fiscal 2008, the Company paid total cash dividends of $126.7 million as
follows: $0.1667 per share in the first and second quarters, $0.20
per share in the third and fourth quarters, and a special one-time cash dividend
of $2.00 per share in the third quarter. During fiscal 2007, cash
dividends totaled $27.0 million as follows: $0.1333 per share in the
first and second quarters and $0.1667 per share in the third and fourth
quarters. During fiscal 2006, cash dividends totaled $74.9 million as
follows: $0.0756 per share in the first and second quarters, $0.0889
per share in the third quarter, $0.1333 per share in the fourth quarter, and a
special one-time cash dividend of $1.3333 per share in the fourth
quarter. Dividend amounts prior to the Company's 3-for-2 stock split
with distribution date of January 12, 2007 and 3-for-2 stock split with
distribution date of October 30, 2008, have been adjusted to reflect the impact
of these stock splits. The Company plans to continue its quarterly
dividends in fiscal 2009.
Stock repurchase plan - During
fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, the Company used cash for repurchasing shares of
the Company’s common stock. In fiscal 2008, the Company purchased
557,100 shares at a cost of $9.4 million. The Company purchased
963,750 shares in fiscal 2007 at a cost of $21.6 million and 981,450 shares in
fiscal 2006 at a cost of $16.0 million. For fiscal 2007 and fiscal
2006, the number of shares purchased prior to the Company's 3-for-2 stock split
in January 2007 and 3-for-2 stock split in October 2008, have been adjusted to
reflect the impact of these stock splits. The Board of Directors
authorized a new 1,000,000 share repurchase plan on November 20, 2008, of which
799,300 shares remained available for repurchase as of January 31,
2009.
During
fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, the Company invested $28.6 million, $25.2 million,
and $19.0 million, respectively, in new store construction, store renovation,
and store technology upgrades. The Company also spent $3.6 million,
$2.3 million, and $2.9 million, in fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively, in
capital expenditures for the corporate headquarters and distribution
facility. The Company also spent $15.2 million during the third
quarter of fiscal 2008 to purchase a new corporate aircraft as a replacement for
the aircraft that was destroyed by a tornado earlier in the year.
During
fiscal 2009, the Company anticipates completing approximately 41 store
construction projects, including approximately 21 new stores and approximately
20 stores to be remodeled and/or relocated. As of March 2009, leases
for 25 new stores have been signed and leases for 5 additional locations, for
fiscal years 2009 – 2011, are under negotiation; however, exact new store
openings, remodels, and relocations may vary from those
anticipated. The average cost of opening a new store during fiscal
2008 was approximately $0.9 million, including construction costs of
approximately $0.7 million and inventory costs of approximately $0.2 million,
net of payables. Management estimates that total capital
expenditures during fiscal 2009 will be approximately $44 to $48
million. The Company believes that existing cash and cash
equivalents, investments, and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to
fund current and long-term anticipated capital expenditures and working capital
requirements for the next several years. The Company has had a
consistent record of generating positive cash flows each year and, as of January
31, 2009, had total cash and investments of $237.8 million. The
Company does not currently have plans for any merger or acquisition, and has
fairly consistent plans for new store expansion and remodels. Based
upon past results and current plans, management does not anticipate any large
swings in the Company’s need for cash in the upcoming years.
Future
conditions, however, may reduce the availability of funds based upon factors
such as a decrease in demand for the Company’s product, change in product mix,
competitive factors, and general economic conditions as well as other risks and
uncertainties which would reduce the Company’s sales, net profitability, and
cash flows. Also, the Company’s acceleration in store openings and/or
remodels, or entering into a merger, acquisition, or other financial related
transaction could reduce the amount of cash available for further capital
expenditures and working capital requirements.
Auction-Rate Securities - As
of January 31, 2009, total cash and investments included $30.3 million of
auction-rate securities (“ARS”) and $0.6 million of preferred securities, which
compares to $145.8 million of ARS and $0.0 of preferred securities as of
February 2, 2008. Of the $30.9 million in ARS and preferred
securities as of January 31, 2009, $1.6 million has been included in short-term
investments, due to known or anticipated subsequent redemptions at par value
plus accrued interest, and $29.3 million has been included in long-term
investments. ARS have a long-term stated maturity, but are reset
through a “dutch auction” process that occurs every 7 to 49 days, depending on
the terms of the individual security. Until February 2008, the ARS
market was highly liquid. During February 2008, however, a
significant number of auctions related to these securities failed, meaning that
there was not enough demand to sell the entire issue at auction. The
failed auctions have limited the current liquidity of the Company’s investments
in ARS and the Company has reason to believe that certain of the underlying
issuers of its ARS are currently at risk. The Company does not
anticipate, however, that further auction failures will have a material impact
on the Company’s ability to fund its business.
23
ARS and
preferred securities are reported at fair market value, and as of January 31,
2009, the reported investment amount is net of a $1.5 million temporary
impairment and a $5.2 million other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) recorded
during fiscal 2008 to account for the impairment of certain securities from
their stated par value. The Company reported the $1.5 million
temporary impairment, net of tax, as an “accumulated other comprehensive loss”
of $0.9 million in stockholders’ equity as of January 31, 2009. The
Company has accounted for the impairment as temporary, as it currently
anticipates being able to successfully liquidate its investments without loss
once the ARS market resumes normal operations. The Company reported
the $5.2 million OTTI ($3.2 million, net of tax) as a loss in the statement of
income for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009. The OTTI is
related to investments in auction-rate preferred securities
(“ARPS”). ARPS are ARS that have an underlying asset of perpetual
preferred stock, providing that in the event of default or liquidation of the
collateral by the ARS issuer or trustee, the Company is entitled to receive
preferred shares in the ARS issuer. Lehman (which filed for
bankruptcy in September 2008) was the broker and auction agent for all of the
ARPS held by the Company. The Lehman bankruptcy resulted in the
conversion of the Bank of America ARPS to preferred stock during January
2009. The converted shares are valued at the quoted price of the
security as of January 31, 2009. Additionally, as a result of the
Lehman bankruptcy, the Company had its remaining ARPS converted to preferred
securities subsequent to year end. All of these issues of preferred
stock are publicly traded and have experienced significant declines in
value. Since it is unlikely that the fair market value of these
investments will recover in the near term, the Company recorded a charge for
OTTI based on the closing price of the converted security as well as for each of
the preferred securities underlying the ARPS as of January 31,
2009. Any future fluctuation in fair value related to these
securities that the Company judges to be other-than-temporary, including any
recoveries of previous write-downs, would be recorded in the statement of income
as an adjustment to net income.
The
Company reviews all investments for OTTI at least quarterly or as indicators of
impairment exist. The value and liquidity of ARS held by the Company
may be affected by continued auction-rate failures, the credit quality of each
security, the amount and timing of interest payments, the amount and timing of
future principal payments, and the probability of full repayment of the
principal. Additional indicators of impairment include the duration
and severity of the decline in market value. The interest rates on
these investments will be determined by the terms of each individual
ARS. The material risks associated with the ARS held by the Company
include those stated above as well as the current economic environment,
downgrading of credit ratings on investments held, and the volatility of the
entities backing each of the issues. In addition, the Company
considers qualitative factors including, but not limited to, the financial
condition of the investee, the credit rating of the investee, and the current
and expected market and industry conditions in which the investee
operates. The Company believes it has the ability and intent to hold
these investments until recovery of market value occurs.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
AND ESTIMATES
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are
based upon The Buckle, Inc.’s financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The preparation of these financial statements requires that
management make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the financial statement date, and the reported amounts of sales and expenses
during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates its
estimates, including those related to inventory and income
taxes. Management bases its estimates on past experience and on
various other factors that are thought to be reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions. Management believes that the
estimates and judgments used in preparing these financial statements were the
most appropriate at that time. Presented below are those critical
accounting policies that management believes require subjective and/or complex
judgments that could potentially affect reported results of
operations.
24
|
1.
|
Revenue
Recognition. Retail store sales are recorded upon the
purchase of merchandise by customers. Online sales are recorded
when merchandise is delivered to the customer, with the time of delivery
being based on estimated shipping time from the Company’s distribution
center to the customer. Shipping fees charged to customers are
included in revenue and shipping costs are included in selling
expenses. The Company accounts for layaway sales in accordance
with SAB No. 101, Revenue Recognition,
recognizing revenue from sales made under its layaway program upon
delivery of the merchandise to the customer. Revenue is not
recorded when gift cards and gift certificates are sold, but rather when a
card or certificate is redeemed for merchandise. A current
liability for unredeemed gift cards and certificates is recorded at the
time the card or certificate is purchased. The amounts of the
gift certificate and gift card liabilities are determined using the
outstanding balances from the prior three and four years of issuance,
respectively. The liability recorded for unredeemed gift
certificates and gift cards was $10.1 million and $8.5 million as of
January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively. The
Company records breakage as other income when the probability of
redemption, which is based on historical redemption patterns, is remote.
Breakage reported for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009, February 2,
2008, and February 3, 2007 was $0.4 million, $0.0 million, and $0.3
million, respectively.
|
The
Company establishes a liability for estimated merchandise returns based upon the
historical average sales return percentage. Customer returns could
potentially exceed the historical average, thus reducing future net sales
results and potentially reducing future net earnings. The accrued
liability for reserve for sales returns was $0.5 million and $0.4 million at
January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively.
|
2.
|
Inventory. Inventory
is valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined
using an average cost method that approximates the first-in, first-out
(FIFO) method. Management makes adjustments to inventory and
cost of goods sold, based upon estimates, to reserve for merchandise
obsolescence and markdowns that could affect market value, based on
assumptions using calculations applied to current inventory levels within
each of four different markdown levels. Management also reviews
the levels of inventory in each markdown group and the overall aging of
the inventory versus the estimated future demand for such product and the
current market conditions. Such judgments could vary
significantly from actual results, either favorably or unfavorably, due to
fluctuations in future economic conditions, industry trends, consumer
demand, and the competitive retail environment. Such changes in
market conditions could negatively impact the sale of markdown inventory,
causing further markdowns or inventory obsolescence, resulting in
increased cost of goods sold from write-offs and reducing the Company’s
net earnings. The liability recorded as a reserve for markdowns
and/or obsolescence was $6.2 million and $5.8 million as of January 31,
2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively. The Company is not
aware of any events, conditions, or changes in demand or price that would
indicate that its inventory valuation may not be materially accurate at
this time.
|
|
3.
|
Income Taxes.
The Company records a deferred tax asset and liability for expected future
tax consequences resulting from temporary differences between financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company
considers future taxable income and ongoing tax planning in assessing the
value of its deferred tax assets. If the Company determines
that it is more than likely that these assets will not be realized, the
Company would reduce the value of these assets to their expected
realizable value, thereby decreasing net income. Estimating the
value of these assets is based upon the Company’s judgment. If
the Company subsequently determined that the deferred tax assets, which
had been written down, would be realized in the future, such value would
be increased. Adjustment would be made to increase net income
in the period such determination was
made.
|
|
4.
|
Operating
Leases. The Company leases retail stores under operating
leases. Most lease agreements contain tenant improvement
allowances, rent holidays, rent escalation clauses, and/or contingent rent
provisions. For purposes of recognizing lease incentives and
minimum rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the terms of the
leases, the Company uses the date of initial possession to begin
amortization, which is generally when the Company enters the space and
begins to make improvements in preparation of intended use. For
tenant improvement allowances and rent holidays, the Company records a
deferred rent liability on the balance sheets and amortizes the deferred
rent over the terms of the leases as reductions to rent expense on the
statements of income.
|
For
scheduled rent escalation clauses during the lease terms or for rental payments
commencing at a date other than the date of initial occupancy, the Company
records minimum rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the terms of the
leases on the statements of income. Certain leases provide for
contingent rents, which are determined as a percentage of gross sales in excess
of specified levels. The Company records a contingent rent liability
on the balance sheets and the corresponding rent expense when specified levels
have been achieved or are reasonably probable to be achieved.
25
|
5.
|
Investments. As
more fully described in Liquidity and Capital Resources on pages 22 to 24
and in Note B to the financial statements on pages 40 to 42, in prior
years the Company invested a portion of its investments in auction-rate
securities (“ARS”) and preferred securities. As of January 31,
2009 $30.3 million in investments were in ARS and $0.6 million in
preferred securities. As of February 2, 2008, $145.8 million
were in ARS and $0.0 in preferred
securities.
|
The
Company reviews impairment in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
03-1 and FSP SFAS 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment and its Application to Certain
Investments, to determine the classification of potential impairments as
either temporary or other-than-temporary. A temporary impairment
results in an unrealized loss being recorded in other comprehensive
income. An impairment that is considered other-than-temporary would
be recognized in net income. The Company considers various factors in
reviewing impairment, including the duration and severity of the decline in
market value. In addition, the Company considers qualitative factors
including, but not limited to, the financial condition of the investee, the
credit rating of the investee, the current and expected market and industry
conditions in which the investee operates, and the Company’s intent and ability
to hold the investments for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery in market value. The Company believes it has the
ability and maintains its intent to hold these investments until recovery of
market value occurs.
The
Company’s investments in ARS and preferred securities are classified as
available-for-sale and reported at fair market value. As of January
31, 2009, the reported investment amount is net of a $1.5 million temporary
impairment and a $5.2 million other-than-temporary impairment
(“OTTI”). These amounts have been recorded during fiscal 2008 to
account for the impairment of certain securities from their stated par
value. The $1.5 million temporary impairment is reported, net of tax,
as an “accumulated other comprehensive loss” of $0.9 million in stockholders’
equity as of January 31, 2009. The Company has accounted for the
impairment as temporary, as it currently expects to be able to successfully
liquidate its investments without loss once the ARS market resumes normal
operations. The Company has reported the $5.2 million OTTI ($3.2
million, net of tax) as a loss in the statement of income for the year ended
January 31, 2009.
The
Company determined the fair value of ARS using Level 1 inputs for known or
anticipated subsequent redemptions at par value, Level 2 inputs using observable
inputs, and Level 3 using unobservable inputs, where the following criteria were
considered in estimating fair value:
|
·
|
Pricing
was provided by the custodian of
ARS;
|
|
·
|
Pricing
was provided by a third-party broker for
ARS;
|
|
·
|
Pricing
was provided by a third-party valuation
consultant;
|
|
·
|
Sales
of similar securities;
|
|
·
|
Quoted
prices for similar securities in active
markets;
|
|
·
|
Quoted
prices for underlying publicly traded preferred
securities;
|
|
·
|
Quoted
prices for similar assets in markets that are not active - including
markets where there are few transactions for the asset, the prices are not
current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time or among
market makers, or in which little information is released
publicly.
|
In
addition, the Company considers other factors including, but not limited to, the
financial condition of the investee, the credit rating, insurance, guarantees,
collateral, cash flows, and the current and expected market and industry
conditions in which the investee operates. Management believes it has
used information that was reasonably obtainable in order to complete its
valuation process and determine if the Company’s investments in ARS had incurred
any temporary and/or other-than-temporary impairment as of January 31,
2009.
26
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS, CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, AND COMMERCIAL
COMMITMENTS
As
referenced in the tables below, the Company has contractual obligations and
commercial commitments that may affect the financial condition of the
Company. Based on management’s review of the terms and conditions of
its contractual obligations and commercial commitments, there is no known trend,
demand, commitment, event, or uncertainty that is reasonably likely to occur
which would have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results
of operations, or cash flows.
In
addition, the commercial obligations and commitments made by the Company are
customary transactions, which are similar to those of other comparable retail
companies. The operating lease obligations shown in the table below
represent future cash payments to landlords required to fulfill the Company’s
minimum rent requirements. Such amounts are actual cash requirements
by year and are not reported net of any tenant improvement allowances received
from landlords.
The
following tables identify the material obligations and commitments as of January
31, 2009:
Payments
Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
(dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
Total
|
Less
than
1
year
|
1-3
years
|
4-5
years
|
After
5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Purchase
obligations
|
$ | 4,081 | $ | 3,963 | $ | 118 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Deferred
compensation
|
$ | 4,090 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 4,090 | ||||||||||
Operating
leases
|
$ | 240,269 | $ | 43,398 | $ | 69,312 | $ | 52,740 | $ | 74,819 | ||||||||||
Total
contractual obligations
|
$ | 248,440 | $ | 47,361 | $ | 69,430 | $ | 52,740 | $ | 78,909 |
Amount
of Commitment Expiration by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Other
Commercial Commitments
(dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
Total
Amounts
Committed
|
Less
than
1
year
|
1-3
years
|
4-5
years
|
After
5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
Lines
of credit
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Total
commercial commitments
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
The
Company has available an unsecured line of credit of $17.5 million, of which
$10.0 million is available for letters of credit, which is excluded from the
preceding table. Certain merchandise purchase orders require that the
Company open letters of credit. When the Company takes possession of
the merchandise, it releases payment on the letters of credit. The
amounts of outstanding letters of credit reported reflect the open letters of
credit on merchandise ordered, but not yet received or funded. The
Company believes it has sufficient credit available to open letters of credit
for merchandise purchases. There were no bank borrowings during
fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006. The Company had outstanding letters of
credit totaling $1.1 million and $0.8 million at January 31, 2009 and February
2, 2008, respectively. The Company has no other off-balance sheet
arrangements.
27
SEASONALITY AND
INFLATION
The
Company's business is seasonal, with the holiday season (from approximately
November 15 to December 30) and the back-to-school season (from approximately
July 15 to September 1) historically contributing the greatest volume of net
sales. For fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006, the holiday and
back-to-school seasons accounted for approximately 37%, 38%, and 36%,
respectively, of the Company's fiscal year net sales. Although the
operations of the Company are influenced by general economic conditions, the
Company does not believe that inflation has had a material effect on the results
of operations during the past three fiscal years. Quarterly results
may vary significantly depending on a variety of factors including the timing
and amount of sales and costs associated with the opening of new stores, the
timing and level of markdowns, the timing of store closings, the remodeling of
existing stores, competitive factors, and general economic
conditions.
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
Included
in other assets is a note receivable of $1.0 million at both January 31, 2009
and February 2, 2008, from a life insurance trust fund controlled by the
Company’s Chairman. The note was created over three years, beginning
in July 1994, when the Company paid life insurance premiums of $0.2 million each
year for the Chairman on a personal policy. The note accrues interest
at 5% of the principal balance per year and is to be paid from the life
insurance proceeds. The note is secured by a life insurance policy on
the Chairman.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
Effective
February 3, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157
(“SFAS 157”), Fair Value
Measurements. This standard defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 apply to all financial
instruments that are being measured and reported on a fair value
basis. In addition, in February 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(“FSP”) FAS 157-2, Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157. This FSP delays the effective
date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years for all non-financial assets and liabilities,
except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis. The partial adoption of SFAS 157
during fiscal 2008 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position
or results of operations and the Company is evaluating the impact of the
adoption of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets beginning in the first quarter of
fiscal 2009. The Company does not anticipate the adoption will have a
material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
Effective
February 3, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Statement No. 159
(“SFAS 159”), The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This
standard provides an option for companies to report selected financial assets
and liabilities at fair value. Although the Company adopted the
provisions of SFAS 159 effective with the beginning of the Company’s 2008 fiscal
year, it did not elect the fair value option for any financial instruments or
other items held by the Company. Therefore, the adoption of SFAS 159
did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Information
in this report, other than historical information, may be considered to be
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “1995 Act”). Such statements are
made in good faith by the Company pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of the
1995 Act. In connection with these safe-harbor provisions, this
management’s discussion and analysis contains certain forward-looking
statements, which reflect management’s current views and estimates of future
economic conditions, Company performance, and financial results. The
statements are based on many assumptions and factors that could cause future
results to differ materially. Such factors include, but are not
limited to, changes in product mix, changes in fashion trends, competitive
factors, and general economic conditions, economic conditions in the retail
apparel industry, as well as other risks and uncertainties inherent in the
Company’s business and the retail industry in general. Any changes in
these factors could result in significantly different results for the
Company. The Company further cautions that the forward-looking
information contained herein is not exhaustive or exclusive. The
Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements, which may
be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.
28
ITEM
7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk -
To the extent that the Company borrows under its line of credit facility, the
Company would be exposed to market risk related to changes in interest
rates. As of January 31, 2009, no borrowings were outstanding under
the line of credit facility. The Company is not a party to any
derivative financial instruments. Additionally, the Company is
exposed to market risk related to interest rate risk on the cash and investments
in interest-bearing securities. These investments have carrying
values that are subject to interest rate changes that could impact earnings to
the extent that the Company did not hold the investments to
maturity. If there are changes in interest rates, those changes would
also affect the investment income the Company earns on its cash and
investments. For each one-quarter percent decline in the
interest/dividend rate earned on cash and investments (approximately a 25%
change in the rate earned), the Company’s net income would decrease
approximately $390,000 or approximately $0.01 per share. This amount
could vary based upon the number of shares of the Company’s stock outstanding
and the level of cash and investments held by the Company.
Other Market Risk –
At January 31, 2009, the Company held $37.5 million, at par value, of
investments in auction-rate securities (“ARS”) and preferred
stock. The Company concluded that a $1.5 million temporary impairment
and $5.2 million other-than-temporary impairment existed related to these
securities as of January 31, 2009. Given current market conditions in
the ARS and equity markets, the Company may incur additional temporary or
other-than-temporary impairment in the future if market conditions persist and
the Company is unable to recover the cost of its investments in
ARS.
29
ITEM
8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The
Buckle, Inc.
Kearney,
Nebraska
We have
audited the accompanying balance sheets of The Buckle, Inc. (the “Company”) as
of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and the related statements of income,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the
period ended January 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement
schedule listed in the Index at item 15. These financial statements and
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our
audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our
opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of The Buckle, Inc. as of January 31, 2009 and February 2,
2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three
fiscal years in the period ended January 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also,
in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have
also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial
reporting as of January 31, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
and our report, dated March 30, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion on the
Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE
& TOUCHE LLP
Omaha,
Nebraska
March 30,
2009
30
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
BALANCE
SHEETS
(Amounts
in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
January
31,
|
February
2,
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 162,463 | $ | 64,293 | ||||
Short-term
investments (Notes A, B, and C)
|
19,150 | 102,910 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance of $46 and $62, respectively
|
3,734 | 2,800 | ||||||
Inventory
|
83,963 | 77,639 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets (Note F)
|
17,655 | 13,979 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
286,965 | 261,621 | ||||||
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT (Note D):
|
264,154 | 240,237 | ||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(147,460 | ) | (137,903 | ) | ||||
116,694 | 102,334 | |||||||
LONG-TERM
INVESTMENTS (Notes A, B, and C)
|
56,213 | 81,201 | ||||||
OTHER
ASSETS (Notes F and G)
|
5,468 | 5,501 | ||||||
$ | 465,340 | $ | 450,657 | |||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 22,472 | $ | 25,155 | ||||
Accrued
employee compensation
|
40,460 | 27,836 | ||||||
Accrued
store operating expenses
|
7,701 | 5,704 | ||||||
Gift
certificates redeemable
|
10,144 | 8,511 | ||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
8,649 | 10,020 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
89,426 | 77,226 | ||||||
DEFERRED
COMPENSATION (Note I)
|
4,090 | 4,127 | ||||||
DEFERRED
RENT LIABILITY
|
34,602 | 30,984 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
128,118 | 112,337 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS
(Notes E and H)
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY (Note J):
|
||||||||
Common
stock, authorized 100,000,000 shares of $.01 par value;
|
||||||||
45,906,265
and 29,841,668 shares issued and outstanding at
|
||||||||
January
31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively
|
459 | 298 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
68,894 | 46,977 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
268,789 | 291,045 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(920 | ) | - | |||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
337,222 | 338,320 | ||||||
$ | 465,340 | $ | 450,657 |
See notes to financial statements.
31
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
STATEMENT
OF INCOME
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)
Fiscal
Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
January
31,
|
February
2,
|
February
3,
|
||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
SALES,
Net of returns and allowances of $54,973, $42,087, and $38,492,
respectively
|
$ | 792,046 | $ | 619,888 | $ | 530,074 | ||||||
COST
OF SALES (Including buying, distribution, and occupancy
costs)
|
448,558 | 365,350 | 322,760 | |||||||||
Gross
profit
|
343,488 | 254,538 | 207,314 | |||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
|
||||||||||||
Selling
|
151,251 | 118,699 | 107,592 | |||||||||
General
and administrative
|
30,041 | 26,212 | 20,701 | |||||||||
181,292 | 144,911 | 128,293 | ||||||||||
INCOME
FROM OPERATIONS
|
162,196 | 109,627 | 79,021 | |||||||||
OTHER
INCOME, Net (Note A)
|
7,829 | 9,183 | 9,032 | |||||||||
UNREALIZED
LOSS ON SECURITIES (Note B)
|
(5,157 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
164,868 | 118,810 | 88,053 | |||||||||
PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES (Note F)
|
60,459 | 43,563 | 32,327 | |||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$ | 104,409 | $ | 75,247 | $ | 55,726 | ||||||
EARNINGS
PER SHARE (Note K):
|
||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 2.30 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 1.29 | ||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 2.24 | $ | 1.63 | $ | 1.24 |
See notes
to financial statements.
32
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
STATEMENTS
OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share
Amounts)
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Unearned
|
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number
of
|
Common
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Compen-
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
sation
|
Loss
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE,
January 29, 2006
|
19,339,153 | $ | 193 | $ | 39,651 | $ | 261,948 | $ | (1,999 | ) | $ | - | $ | 299,793 | ||||||||||||||
Reclassify
unearned compensation
|
- | - | (1,999 | ) | - | 1,999 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | 55,726 | - | - | 55,726 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
paid on common stock,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($.0756
per share - 1st and 2nd qtrs)
|
- | - | - | (6,647 | ) | - | - | (6,647 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
($.0889
per share - 3rd qtr)
|
- | - | - | (3,841 | ) | - | - | (3,841 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
($.1333
per share - 4th qtr)
|
- | - | - | (5,879 | ) | - | - | (5,879 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
($1.333
per share - 4th qtr)
|
- | - | - | (58,507 | ) | - | - | (58,507 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued on exercise
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of
stock options
|
573,406 | 6 | 11,262 | - | - | - | 11,268 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of non-vested stock
|
136,000 | 1 | (1 | ) | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of non-vested
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
stock
grants
|
- | - | 2,708 | - | - | - | 2,708 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture
of non-vested stock
|
(5,530 | ) | - | (13 | ) | - | - | - | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock
option compensation expense
|
- | - | 2,510 | - | - | - | 2,510 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock purchased and retired
|
(436,200 | ) | (4 | ) | (16,040 | ) | - | - | - | (16,044 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Income
tax benefit related to
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
exercise
of stock options
|
- | - | 5,513 | - | - | - | 5,513 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3-for-2
stock split
|
9,801,747 | 98 | (98 | ) | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE,
February 3, 2007
|
29,408,576 | 294 | 43,493 | 242,800 | - | - | 286,587 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | 75,247 | - | - | 75,247 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
paid on common stock,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($.1333
per share - 1st and 2nd qtrs)
|
- | - | - | (12,014 | ) | - | - | (12,014 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
($.1667
per share - 3rd and 4th qtrs)
|
- | - | - | (14,988 | ) | - | - | (14,988 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued on exercise
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of
stock options
|
937,247 | 9 | 12,015 | - | - | - | 12,024 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of non-vested stock,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
net
of forfeitures
|
138,345 | 1 | (1 | ) | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of non-vested
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
stock
grants
|
- | - | 3,886 | - | - | - | 3,886 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
option compensation expense
|
- | - | 293 | - | - | - | 293 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock purchased and retired
|
(642,500 | ) | (6 | ) | (21,571 | ) | - | - | - | (21,577 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Income
tax benefit related to
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
exercise
of stock options
|
- | - | 8,862 | - | - | - | 8,862 | |||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE,
February 2, 2008
|
29,841,668 | 298 | 46,977 | 291,045 | - | - | 338,320 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | 104,409 | - | - | 104,409 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
paid on common stock,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($.1667
per share - 1st and 2nd qtrs)
|
- | - | - | (15,269 | ) | - | - | (15,269 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
($.20
per share - 3rd and 4th qtrs)
|
- | - | - | (18,474 | ) | - | - | (18,474 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
($2.00
per share - 3rd qtr)
|
- | - | - | (92,922 | ) | - | - | (92,922 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued on exercise
|
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of
stock options
|
994,555 | 10 | 12,714 | - | - | - | 12,724 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of non-vested stock,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
net
of forfeitures
|
139,635 | 1 | (1 | ) | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of non-vested
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
stock
grants
|
- | - | 4,879 | - | - | - | 4,879 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
option compensation expense
|
- | - | 289 | - | - | - | 289 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock purchased and retired
|
(557,100 | ) | (5 | ) | (9,354 | ) | - | - | - | (9,359 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Income
tax benefit related to
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
exercise
of stock options
|
- | - | 13,545 | - | - | - | 13,545 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3-for-2
stock split
|
15,487,507 | 155 | (155 | ) | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
investments,
net of tax
|
- | - | - | - | - | (920 | ) | (920 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE,
January 31, 2009
|
45,906,265 | $ | 459 | $ | 68,894 | $ | 268,789 | $ | - | $ | (920 | ) | $ | 337,222 |
See notes
to financial statements.
33
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands)
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
January 31,
|
February 2,
|
February 3,
|
||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 104,409 | $ | 75,247 | $ | 55,726 | ||||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
21,779 | 20,384 | 19,370 | |||||||||
Amortization
of non-vested stock grants, net of forfeitures
|
4,879 | 3,886 | 2,695 | |||||||||
Stock
option compensation expense
|
289 | 293 | 2,510 | |||||||||
Gain
on involuntary conversion of aircraft to monetary asset
|
(2,963 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Unrealized
loss on securities
|
5,157 | - | - | |||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(595 | ) | (1,509 | ) | (2,454 | ) | ||||||
Other
|
574 | 146 | 449 | |||||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(895 | ) | 1,246 | 778 | ||||||||
Inventory
|
(6,324 | ) | (7,333 | ) | (1,575 | ) | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
(2,478 | ) | (1,542 | ) | (4,565 | ) | ||||||
Accounts
payable
|
(844 | ) | 8,903 | 3,146 | ||||||||
Accrued
employee compensation
|
12,624 | 10,036 | (2,296 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued
store operating expenses
|
1,997 | 1,236 | 743 | |||||||||
Gift
certificates redeemable
|
1,633 | 1,802 | 1,214 | |||||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
906 | 5,576 | 1,590 | |||||||||
Long-term
liabilities and deferred compensation
|
3,581 | 2,709 | 3,060 | |||||||||
Net
cash flows from operating activities
|
143,729 | 121,080 | 80,391 | |||||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(47,448 | ) | (27,484 | ) | (21,857 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
11,819 | 21 | 20 | |||||||||
Change
in other assets
|
(29 | ) | 167 | (26 | ) | |||||||
Purchases
of investments
|
(46,687 | ) | (153,511 | ) | (92,685 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds
from sales / maturities of investments
|
148,818 | 117,079 | 121,332 | |||||||||
Net
cash flows from investing activities
|
66,473 | (63,728 | ) | 6,784 | ||||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from the exercise of stock options
|
12,724 | 12,024 | 11,268 | |||||||||
Excess
tax benefit from stock option exercises
|
11,268 | 7,744 | 4,789 | |||||||||
Purchases
of common stock
|
(9,359 | ) | (21,577 | ) | (16,044 | ) | ||||||
Payment
of dividends
|
(126,665 | ) | (27,002 | ) | (74,874 | ) | ||||||
Net
cash flows from financing activities
|
(112,032 | ) | (28,811 | ) | (74,861 | ) | ||||||
NET
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
98,170 | 28,541 | 12,314 | |||||||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, Beginning of year
|
64,293 | 35,752 | 23,438 | |||||||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, End of year
|
$ | 162,463 | $ | 64,293 | $ | 35,752 |
See notes
to financial statements.
34
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
A.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Fiscal
Year – The Buckle, Inc. (the “Company”) has its fiscal year end on the
Saturday nearest January 31. All references in these financial
statements to fiscal years are to the calendar year in which the fiscal year
begins. Fiscal 2008 represents the 52-week period ended January 31,
2009, fiscal 2007 represents the 52-week period ended February 2, 2008, and
fiscal 2006 represents the 53-week period ended February 3, 2007.
Nature of
Operations – The Company is a retailer of medium to better-priced casual
apparel, footwear, and accessories for fashion conscious young men and women
operating 387 stores located in 39 states throughout the continental United
States as of January 31, 2009.
During
fiscal 2008, the Company opened 21 new stores, substantially renovated 13
stores, and closed 2 stores. During fiscal 2007, the Company opened 20 new
stores, substantially renovated 7 stores, and closed 2 stores. During
fiscal 2006, the Company opened 17 new stores, substantially renovated 10
stores, and closed 5 stores.
Revenue
Recognition – Retail store sales are recorded upon the purchase of
merchandise by customers. Online sales are recorded when merchandise
is delivered to the customer, with the time of delivery being based on estimated
shipping time from the Company’s distribution center to the
customer. Shipping fees charged to customers are included in revenue
and shipping costs are included in selling expenses. Shipping costs
were $3,813, $1,882, and $1,547 during fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively. Merchandise returns are estimated based upon the
historical average sales return percentage and accrued at the end of the
period. The reserve for merchandise returns was $526 and $400 as of
January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively. The Company
accounts for layaway sales in accordance with SAB No. 101, Revenue Recognition,
recognizing revenue from sales made under its layaway program upon delivery of
the merchandise to the customer. The Company has several sales incentives that
it offers customers including a frequent shopper punch card, B-Rewards gift
certificates, and occasional sweepstakes and gift with purchase
offers. The frequent shopper punch card is recognized as a cost of
goods sold at the time of redemption, using the actual amount
tendered. The B-Rewards incentives, based upon $10 for each $300 in
net purchases, are recorded as a liability and as a selling expense at the time
the gift certificates are earned. Sweepstake prizes are recorded as
cost of goods sold (if it is a merchandise giveaway) or as a selling expense at
the time the prize is redeemed by the customer, using actual costs incurred, and
gifts with purchase are recorded as a cost of goods sold at the time of the
purchase and gift redemption, using the actual cost of the gifted
item.
The
Company records the sale of gift cards and gift certificates as a current
liability and recognizes a sale when a customer redeems the gift card or gift
certificate. The amount of the gift certificate liability is
determined using the outstanding balances from the prior three years of issuance
and the gift card liability is determined using the outstanding balances from
the prior four years of issuance. The Company records breakage as
other income when the probability of redemption, which is based on historical
redemption patterns, is remote. Breakage reported for the fiscal years ended
January 31, 2009, February 2, 2008, and February 3, 2007 was $389, $0, and $307,
respectively. The Company recognizes a current liability for the
downpayment made when merchandise is placed on layaway and recognizes layaways
as a sale at the time the customer makes final payment and picks up the
merchandise.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents – The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments
with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash
equivalents.
35
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
Investments
– The Company accounts for investments in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards Board (SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities. Investments classified as
short-term investments include securities with a maturity of greater than three
months and less than one year, and a portion of the Company’s investments in
auction-rate securities (“ARS”), which are available-for-sale
securities. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value,
with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported as a
separate component of stockholders’ equity (net of the effect of income taxes),
using the specific identification method, until they are sold. The
Company reviews impairments in accordance with Emerging Task Force (EITF) 03-1
and FSP SFAS 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment and its Application to Certain
Investments, to determine the classification of potential impairments as
either “temporary” or “other-than-temporary.” A temporary impairment
results in an unrealized loss being recorded in the other comprehensive
income. Impairments that are considered other-than-temporary are
recognized as a loss in the statements of income. The Company
considers various factors in reviewing impairments, including the length of time
and extent to which the fair value has been less than the Company’s cost basis,
the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the Company’s
intent and ability to hold the investments for a period of time sufficient to
allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Held-to-maturity
securities are carried at amortized cost. The Company believes it has
the ability and maintains its intent to hold these investments until recovery of
market value occurs. Trading securities are reported at fair value,
with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings, using the specific
identification method.
The
Company’s investments in ARS and preferred securities are reported at fair
market value, and as of January 31, 2009, the reported investment amount is net
of a $1,460 temporary impairment and a $5,157 other-than-temporary impairment
(“OTTI”) recorded during fiscal 2008 to account for the impairment of certain
securities from their stated par value. The Company reported the
$1,460 temporary impairment, net of tax, as an “accumulated other comprehensive
loss” of $920 in stockholders’ equity as of January 31, 2009. The
Company has accounted for the impairment as temporary, as it currently expects
to be able to successfully liquidate its investments without loss once the ARS
market resumes normal operations. The Company reported the $5,157
OTTI ($3,249, net of tax) as a loss in the statement of income for the fiscal
year ended January 31, 2009. The Company was able to successfully
liquidate $112,940 of its investments in ARS at par value during fiscal
2008. The Company reviews all investments for OTTI at least quarterly
or as indicators of impairment exist. Indicators of impairment
include the duration and severity of the decline in market value. In
addition, the Company considers qualitative factors including, but not limited
to, the financial condition of the investee, the credit rating of the investee,
and the current and expected market and industry conditions in which the
investee operates.
Inventory
– Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is
determined using the average cost method. Management records a reserve for
merchandise obsolescence and markdowns based on assumptions using calculations
applied to current inventory levels by department within each of four different
markdown levels. Management also reviews the levels of inventory in
each markdown group, and the overall aging of inventory, versus the estimated
future demand for such product and the current market conditions. The
calculation for estimated markdowns and/or obsolescence reduced the Company’s
inventory valuation by $6,228 and $5,789 as of January 31, 2009 and February 2,
2008, respectively. The amount charged (credited) to cost of goods
sold, resulting from changes in the markdown reserve balance, was $439, $(581),
and $(126), for fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
36
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
Property and
Equipment – Property and equipment are stated on the basis of historical
cost. Depreciation is provided using a combination of accelerated and
straight-line methods based upon the estimated useful lives of the assets. The
majority of the property and equipment have useful lives of five to ten years
with the exception of buildings, which have estimated useful lives of 31.5 to 39
years. Leasehold improvements are stated on the basis of historical
cost and are amortized over the shorter of the life of the lease or the
estimated economic life of the assets. When circumstances indicate
the carrying values of long-lived assets may be impaired, an evaluation is
performed on current net book value amounts. Judgments made by the
Company related to the expected useful lives of property and equipment and the
ability to realize cash flows in excess of carrying amounts of such assets are
affected by factors such as changes in economic conditions and changes in
operating performance. As the Company assesses the expected cash
flows and carrying amounts of long-lived assets, adjustments are made to such
carrying values.
Pre-Opening
Expenses – Costs related to opening new stores are expensed as
incurred.
Advertising
Costs – Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and were $7,674,
$6,376 and $6,453 for fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively.
Health Care
Costs - The Company is self-funded for health and dental claims up to
$200 per individual per plan year. The Company’s plan covers eligible employees,
and management makes estimates at period end to record a reserve for unpaid
claims based upon historical claims information. The accrued
liability as a reserve for unpaid health care claims was $600 as of both January
31, 2009 and February 2, 2008.
Operating
Leases – The Company leases retail stores under operating
leases. Most lease agreements contain tenant improvement allowances,
rent holidays, rent escalation clauses, and/or contingent rent
provisions. For purposes of recognizing lease incentives and minimum
rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases, the
Company uses the date of initial possession to begin expensing rent, which is
generally when the Company enters the space and begins to make improvements in
preparation of intended use.
For
tenant improvement allowances and rent holidays, the Company records a deferred
rent liability on the balance sheets and amortizes the deferred rent over the
terms of the leases as reductions to rent expense on the statements of
income.
For
scheduled rent escalation clauses during the lease terms or for rental payments
commencing at a date other than the date of initial occupancy, the Company
records minimum rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the terms of the
leases on the statements of income. Certain leases provide for
contingent rents, which are determined as a percentage of gross sales in excess
of specified levels. The Company records a contingent rent liability
in “accrued store operating expenses” on the balance sheets and the
corresponding rent expense when specified levels have been achieved or are
reasonably probable to be achieved.
Other Income
– The Company’s other income is derived primarily from interest and
dividends received on cash and investments, but also includes miscellaneous
other sources of income.
Income Taxes –
The Company records a deferred tax asset and liability for expected
future tax consequences resulting from temporary differences between financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company
considers future taxable income and ongoing tax planning in assessing the value
of its deferred tax assets. If the judgment of the Company’s
management determines that it is more than likely that these assets will not be
realized, the Company would reduce the value of these assets to their expected
realizable value, thereby decreasing net income. If the Company
subsequently determined that the deferred tax assets, which had been written
down, would be realized in the future, such value would be
increased. Adjustment would be made to increase net income in
the period such determination was made.
37
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
Stock
Splits – On December 11, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved
a 3-for-2 stock split payable in the form of a stock dividend for shareholders
of record as of January 3, 2007, with a distribution date of January 12,
2007. On September 15, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors
approved a 3-for-2 stock split payable in the form of a stock dividend for
shareholders of record as of October 15, 2008, with a distribution date of
October 30, 2008. All share and per share data (except par value and
historical stockholders’ equity data) presented in the financial statements for
all periods has been adjusted to reflect the impact of these stock
splits.
Financial
Instruments and Credit Risk Concentrations – Financial instruments, which
potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, are primarily
cash, investments, and accounts receivable. The Company places its
investments primarily in tax-free municipal bonds, auction-rate securities, or
U.S. Treasury securities with short-term maturities and limits the amount of
credit exposure to any one entity.
Of the
Company’s $237,826 in total cash and investments as of January 31, 2009, $30,278
was comprised of investments in auction-rate securities (“ARS”) and $600 of
investments in preferred securities. ARS have a long-term stated
maturity, but are reset through a “dutch auction” process that occurs every 7 to
49 days, depending on the terms of the individual security. Until
February 2008, the ARS market was highly liquid. During February
2008, however, a significant number of auctions related to these securities
failed, meaning that there was not enough demand to sell the entire issue at
auction. The impact of the failed auctions on holders of ARS is that
the holder cannot sell the securities and the issuer’s interest rate is
generally reset to a higher “penalty” rate. The failed auctions have
limited the current liquidity of certain of the Company’s investments in ARS,
however, the Company has no reason to believe that any further auction failures
will have a material impact on the Company’s ability to fund its
business. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts
receivable are limited due to the nature of the Company’s receivables, which
include primarily employee receivables that can be offset against future
compensation. The Company’s financial instruments have a fair value
approximating the carrying value.
Earnings Per
Share – Basic earnings per share data are based on the weighted average
outstanding common shares during the period. Diluted earnings per
share data are based on the weighted average outstanding common shares and the
effect of all dilutive potential common shares, including stock
options. Basic and diluted earnings per share for fiscal 2006 and
2007 have been adjusted to reflect the impact of the Company’s 3-for-2 stock
split paid in the form of a stock dividend on October 30, 2008.
Use of
Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of certain assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
38
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
Comprehensive
Income – Comprehensive income consists of net income and unrealized gains
and losses on available-for-sale securities. Unrealized losses on the
Company’s investments in auction-rate securities have been included in
accumulated other comprehensive loss and are separately included as a component
of stockholders’ equity, net of related income taxes.
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
January
31,
|
February
2,
|
February
3,
|
||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 104,409 | $ | 75,247 | $ | 55,726 | ||||||
Changes
in net unrealized losses on investments in auction- rate securities, net
of taxes of $540, $0, and $0, respectively
|
(920 | ) | - | - | ||||||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
$ | 103,489 | $ | 75,247 | $ | 55,726 |
Recently Issued
Accounting Pronouncements – Effective February 3, 2008, the Company
adopted the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), Fair Value
Measurements. This standard defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 apply to all financial
instruments that are being measured and reported on a fair value
basis. In addition, in February 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(“FSP”) FAS 157-2, Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157. This FSP delays the effective
date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years for all non-financial assets and liabilities,
except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis. The partial adoption of SFAS 157
during fiscal 2008 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position
or results of operations and the Company is evaluating the impact of the
adoption of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets beginning in the first quarter of
fiscal 2009. The Company does not anticipate the adoption will have a
material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
Effective
February 3, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Statement No. 159
(“SFAS 159”), The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This
standard provides an option for companies to report selected financial assets
and liabilities at fair value. Although the Company adopted the
provisions of SFAS 159 effective with the beginning of the Company’s 2008 fiscal
year, it did not elect the fair value option for any financial instruments or
other items held by the Company. Therefore, the adoption of SFAS 159
did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
Supplemental Cash
Flow Information - The Company had non-cash investing activities during
the fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006 of $1,839, $1,582, and $405,
respectively. The non-cash investing activity relates to unpaid purchases
of property, plant, and equipment included in accounts payable as of the end of
the year. Amounts reported as unpaid purchases are recorded as cash
outflows from investing activities for purchases of property, plant, and
equipment in the statement of cash flows in the period they are
paid.
Additional
cash flow information for the Company includes cash paid for income taxes during
fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006 of $48,879, $31,730, and $28,516,
respectively.
39
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
B.
|
INVESTMENTS
|
The
following is a summary of investments as of January 31, 2009:
Amortized
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
Other-than-
|
Estimated
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost
or
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Temporary
|
Fair
|
||||||||||||||||
Par
Value
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Impairment
|
Value
|
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Auction-rate
securities
|
$ | 35,495 | $ | - | $ | (1,460 | ) | $ | (3,757 | ) | $ | 30,278 | ||||||||
Preferred
stock
|
2,000 | - | - | (1,400 | ) | 600 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 37,495 | $ | - | $ | (1,460 | ) | $ | (5,157 | ) | $ | 30,878 | |||||||||
Held-to-Maturity
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
State
and municipal bonds
|
$ | 31,965 | $ | 536 | $ | (90 | ) | - | $ | 32,411 | ||||||||||
Fixed
maturities
|
2,500 | 37 | (7 | ) | - | 2,530 | ||||||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
2,945 | 42 | - | - | 2,987 | |||||||||||||||
U.S.
treasuries
|
2,985 | 19 | (9 | ) | - | 2,995 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 40,395 | $ | 634 | $ | (106 | ) | $ | - | $ | 40,923 | ||||||||||
Trading
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Mutual
funds
|
$ | 5,165 | $ | - | $ | (1,075 | ) | $ | - | $ | 4,090 |
The
following is a summary of investments as of February 2, 2008:
Amortized
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
or
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
Par
Value
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Auction-rate
securities
|
$ | 145,835 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 145,835 | ||||||||
Held-to-Maturity
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
State
and municipal bonds
|
$ | 26,260 | $ | 375 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 26,625 | |||||||
Fixed
maturities
|
2,899 | 1 | - | 2,900 | ||||||||||||
U.S.
treasuries
|
4,990 | 24 | - | 5,014 | ||||||||||||
$ | 34,149 | $ | 400 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 34,539 | ||||||||
Trading
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Mutual
funds
|
$ | 4,143 | $ | 5 | $ | (21 | ) | $ | 4,127 |
40
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
The
auction-rate securities were invested as follows as of January 31,
2009:
Nature
|
Underlying Collateral
|
Par Value
|
||||
Municipal
revenue bonds
|
83%
insured by AAA/AA/A-rated bond insurers at January 31,
2009
|
$ | 14,945 | |||
Municipal
bond funds
|
Fixed
income instruments within issuers' money market funds
|
11,400 | ||||
Student
loan bonds
|
Student
loans guaranteed by state entities
|
3,750 | ||||
Tax
preferred securities
|
Underlying
investments of closed-end funds
|
5,400 | ||||
Total
par value
|
$ | 35,495 |
As of
January 31, 2009, the Company’s auction-rate securities portfolio was 49%
AAA/Aaa-rated, 29% AA/Aa-rated, 7% A-rated, and 15% below A-rated.
The
amortized cost and fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity as of
January 31, 2009 is as follows:
Amortized
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||
Fiscal
Periods
|
||||||||
Twelve
months ending January 30, 2010
|
$ | 17,600 | $ | 17,725 | ||||
Twelve
months ending January 29, 2011
|
11,700 | 11,851 | ||||||
Twelve
months ending January 28, 2012
|
3,040 | 3,123 | ||||||
Twelve
months ending February 2, 2013
|
1,190 | 1,252 | ||||||
Twelve
months ending February 1, 2014
|
964 | 999 | ||||||
Thereafter
|
5,901 | 5,973 | ||||||
$ | 40,395 | $ | 40,923 |
At
January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, held-to-maturity investments of $22,795
and $20,152 are classified in long-term investments. Trading securities are held
in a Rabbi Trust, intended to fund the Company’s deferred compensation plan, and
are classified in long-term investments.
The
Company’s investments in auction-rate securities (“ARS”) are classified as
available-for-sale and reported at fair market value. As of January
31, 2009, the reported investment amount is net of $1,460 of temporary
impairment and $5,157 of other-than-temporary impairment
(“OTTI”). These amounts have been recorded during fiscal 2008 to
account for the impairment of certain securities from their stated par
value. The $1,460 temporary impairment is reported, net of tax, as an
“accumulated other comprehensive loss” of $920 in stockholders’ equity as of
January 31, 2009. The Company has reported the $5,157 OTTI ($3,249,
net of tax) as a loss in the statement of income for the year ended January 31,
2009.
41
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
As of
January 31, 2009, the Company had $35,495 invested in ARS and $2,000 invested in
preferred securities, at par value, which are reported at their estimated fair
value of $30,278 and $600, respectively. As of February 2, 2008, the
Company had $145,835 invested in ARS and no preferred securities. ARS
have a long-term stated maturity, but are reset through a “dutch auction”
process that occurs every 7 to 49 days, depending on the terms of the individual
security. Until February 2008, the ARS market was highly
liquid. During February 2008, however, a significant number of
auctions related to these securities failed, meaning that there was not enough
demand to sell the entire issue at auction. The failed auctions have
limited the current liquidity of certain of the Company’s investments in ARS and
the Company has reason to believe that certain of the underlying issuers of its
ARS are currently at risk. The Company does not, however, anticipate
that further auction failures will have a material impact on the Company’s
ability to fund its business. The Company was able to successfully
liquidate $112,940 of its investments in ARS at par value during fiscal
2008.
As of
January 31, 2009, $1,550 of the Company’s investment in ARS and preferred
securities was classified in short-term investments, due to known or anticipated
subsequent redemptions, and $29,328 was classified in long-term
investments. The amount classified in long-term investments has not
experienced a successful auction subsequent to the end of the Company’s fiscal
year and is net of $1,460 of temporary impairment plus $5,157 of
OTTI. The OTTI is related to investments in auction-rate preferred
securities (“ARPS”). ARPS are ARS that have an underlying asset of
perpetual preferred stock, providing that in the event of default or liquidation
of the collateral by the ARS issuer or trustee, the Company is entitled to
receive preferred shares in the ARS issuer. Lehman (which filed for
bankruptcy in September 2008) was the broker and auction agent for all of the
ARPS held by the Company. The Lehman bankruptcy resulted in the conversion of
the Bank of America ARPS to preferred stock during January 2009. The
converted shares are valued at the quoted price of the security as of January
31, 2009. Additionally, as a result of the Lehman bankruptcy, the
Company had the remaining ARPS converted to preferred securities subsequent to
year end. All of these issues of preferred stock are publicly traded
and have experienced significant declines in value. Since it is
unlikely that the fair market value of these investments will recover in the
near term, the Company recorded a charge for OTTI based on the closing price of
the converted security as well as for each of the preferred securities
underlying the ARPS as of January 31, 2009. For the investments
considered temporarily impaired, the Company believes that these ARS can be
successfully redeemed or liquidated through future auctions at par value plus
accrued interest. The Company believes it has the ability and
maintains its intent to hold these investments until such recovery of market
value occurs; therefore, the Company believes the current lack of liquidity has
created the temporary impairment in valuation.
As of
February 2, 2008, $88,913 of the Company’s investment in ARS was classified in
short-term investments and $56,922 was classified in long-term
investments.
42
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
C.
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASURMENTS
|
Effective
February 3, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157
(“SFAS 157”), Fair Value
Measurements. This standard defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 apply to all financial
instruments that are being measured and reported on a fair value
basis. In addition, in February 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(“FSP”) FAS 157-2, Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157. This FSP delays the effective
date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for all
non-financial assets and liabilities. The partial adoption of SFAS
157 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
As
defined by SFAS 157, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. Financial assets and
liabilities measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed in
one of the following categories:
|
·
|
Level
1 – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Short-term and long-term investments with active
markets or known redemption values are reported at fair value utilizing
Level 1 inputs.
|
|
·
|
Level
2 – Observable market-based inputs (either directly or indirectly) such as
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets
that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or inputs that
are corroborated by market data. Items reported at fair value
using Level 2 inputs consist of certain auction-rate securities (“ARS”)
classified as long-term investments. The Company concluded that
the auction-rate preferred securities (“ARPS”) with underlyings of
publicly traded preferred stock, classified as long-term due to failed
auctions, represent Level 2 valuation and are valued using the publicly
available trading prices of the underlying preferred shares as the basis
for valuation.
|
|
·
|
Level
3 – Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data and are
projections, estimates, or interpretations that are supported by little or
no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the
assets. The Company has concluded that certain of its ARS
represent Level 3 valuation and should be valued using a discounted cash
flow analysis. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted
cash flow model include estimates for interest rates, timing and amount of
cash flows, and expected holding periods of the
ARS.
|
As of
January 31, 2009, the Company held certain assets that are required to be
measured at fair value on a recurring basis including available-for-sale and
trading securities. The Company’s available-for-sale securities
include its investments in ARS, as further described in Note B. The
failed auctions, beginning in February 2008, related to certain of the Company’s
investments in ARS have limited the availability of quoted market
prices. The Company has determined the fair value of its ARS using
Level 1 inputs for known or anticipated subsequent redemptions at par value,
Level 2 inputs using observable inputs, and Level 3 using unobservable inputs
where the following criteria were considered in estimating fair
value:
|
·
|
Pricing
was provided by the custodian of
ARS;
|
|
·
|
Pricing
was provided by a third-party broker for
ARS;
|
|
·
|
Pricing
was provided by a third-part valuation
consultant;
|
|
·
|
Sales
of similar securities;
|
|
·
|
Quoted
prices for similar securities in active
markets;
|
|
·
|
Quoted
prices for underlying publicly traded preferred
securities;
|
|
·
|
Quoted
prices for similar assets in markets that are not active - including
markets where there are few transactions for the asset, the prices are not
current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time or among
market makers, or in which little information is released
publicly.
|
43
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
In
addition, the Company considers other factors including, but not limited to, the
financial condition of the investee, the credit rating, insurance, guarantees,
collateral, cash flows, and the current and expected market and industry
conditions in which the investee operates. Management believes it has used
information that was reasonably obtainable in order to complete its valuation
process and determine if the Company’s investments in ARS had incurred any
temporary and/or other-than-temporary impairment as of January 31,
2009.
As a
result of the decline in fair value for certain of the Company’s investments in
ARS, the Company recorded a temporary impairment of $1,460 and an OTTI of $5,157
during fiscal 2008. The Company has reported the $1,460 of temporary
impairment, net of tax, as a $920 reduction to stockholders’ equity in
“accumulated other comprehensive loss” as of January 31, 2009. Any
future fluctuation in fair value related to these securities that the Company
judges to be temporary, including any recoveries of previous write-downs, would
be recorded as an adjustment to “accumulated other comprehensive
loss.” The Company has reported the $5,157 OTTI ($3,249, net of tax)
as a loss in the statement of income for the fiscal year ended January 31,
2009. The Company reviews all investments for OTTI at least quarterly
or as indicators of impairment exist. The value and liquidity of ARS
held by the Company may be affected by continued auction-rate failures, the
credit quality of each security, the amount and timing of interest payments, the
amount and timing of future principal payments, and the probability of full
repayment of the principal. Additional indicators of impairment
include the duration and severity of the decline in market value. The
interest rates on these investments will be determined by the terms of each
individual ARS. The material risks associated with the ARS held by
the Company include those stated above as well as the current economic
environment, downgrading of credit ratings on investments held, and the
volatility of the entities backing each of the issues. In addition, the Company
considers other factors including, but not limited to, the financial condition
of the investee, the credit rating of the investee, and the current and expected
market and industry conditions in which the investee operates.
The
Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject
to the disclosure requirements of SFAS 157 as of January 31, 2009 were as
follows:
Fair
Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Assets
(Level
1)
|
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level
2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
ASSETS:
|
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale
securities (including auction-rate
securities and preferred stock)
|
$ | 2,150 | $ | 21,468 | $ | 7,260 | $ | 30,878 | ||||||||
Trading
securities (including mutual funds)
|
4,090 | - | - | 4,090 | ||||||||||||
Totals
|
$ |
6,240
|
$ | 21,468 | $ | 7,260 | $ | 34,968 |
ARS and
preferred securities included in Level 1 represent securities which have a known
or anticipated upcoming redemption as of January 31, 2009 and those that have
publicly traded quoted prices. ARS included in Level 2 represent
securities which have not experienced a successful auction subsequent to
February 2, 2008. The fair market value for these securities was
determined by applying a discount to par value based on auction prices for
similar securities and by utilizing a discounted cash flow model, using
market-based inputs, to determine fair value. The Company used a
discounted cash flow model to value its Level 3 investments, using estimates
regarding recovery periods, yield, and liquidity. The assumptions used are
subjective based upon management’s judgment and views on current market
conditions, and resulted in $690 of the Company’s recorded temporary impairment.
The use of different assumptions would result in a different valuation and
related temporary impairment charge. Prior to fiscal 2008, the fair value for
these securities had been based on quoted market prices, which were readily
available at that time.
44
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
D.
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
January
31,
|
February
2,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Land
|
$ | 1,170 | $ | 1,170 | ||||
Building
and improvements
|
13,447 | 12,233 | ||||||
Office
equipment
|
6,043 | 4,839 | ||||||
Transportation
equipment
|
18,997 | 15,863 | ||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
111,544 | 103,157 | ||||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
96,778 | 86,409 | ||||||
Shipping/receiving
equipment
|
10,294 | 10,093 | ||||||
Screenprinting equipment | 111 | 111 | ||||||
Construction-in-progress
|
5,770 | 6,362 | ||||||
$ | 264,154 | $ | 240,237 |
E.
|
FINANCING
ARRANGEMENTS
|
The
Company has available an unsecured line of credit of $17,500 of which $10,000 is
available for letters of credit. Borrowings under the line of credit
and letter of credit provide for interest to be paid at a rate equal to the
prime rate as set by the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. index on the date of the
borrowings. There were no bank borrowings at January 31, 2009 and
February 2, 2008. There were no bank borrowings during fiscal 2008,
2007, and 2006. The Company had outstanding letters of credit
totaling $1,059 and $813 at January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008,
respectively.
F.
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
The
provision for income taxes consists of:
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
January
31,
|
February
2,
|
February
3,
|
||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Current
income tax expense (benefit):
|
||||||||||||
Federal
|
$ | 52,905 | $ | 38,224 | $ | 29,397 | ||||||
State
|
8,149 | 6,849 | 5,384 | |||||||||
Deferred
|
(595 | ) | (1,509 | ) | (2,454 | ) | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 60,459 | $ | 43,564 | $ | 32,327 |
45
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
Total
income tax expense for the year varies from the amount which would be provided
by applying the statutory income tax rate to earnings before income
taxes. The primary reasons for this difference (expressed as a
percent of pre-tax income) are as follows:
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
January
31,
|
February
2,
|
February
3,
|
||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Statutory
rate
|
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||
State
income tax effect
|
3.6 | 4.0 | 4.1 | |||||||||
Tax
exempt interest income
|
(1.0 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (2.2 | ) | ||||||
Other
|
(0.9 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||||
Effective
tax rate
|
36.7 | % | 36.7 | % | 36.7 | % |
Deferred
income tax assets and liabilities are comprised of the following:
January
31,
|
February
2,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Deferred
income tax assets (liabilities):
|
||||||||
Inventory
|
$ | 3,681 | $ | 3,384 | ||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
3,112 | 2,639 | ||||||
Accrued
compensation
|
2,547 | 2,291 | ||||||
Accrued
store operating costs
|
262 | 152 | ||||||
Unrealized
loss on securities
|
2,847 | 6 | ||||||
Gift
certificates redeemable
|
495 | 406 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
17 | 23 | ||||||
Deferred
rent liability
|
12,803 | 11,464 | ||||||
Property
and equipment
|
(14,228 | ) | (9,964 | ) | ||||
Net
deferred income tax asset
|
$ | 11,536 | $ | 10,401 |
At
January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively, the net current deferred
income tax assets of $7,085 and $5,887 are classified in “prepaid expenses and
other assets.” The net non-current deferred income tax assets of
$4,451 and $4,514 are classified in “other assets” at January 31, 2009 and
February 2, 2008, respectively.
G.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
Included
in other assets is a note receivable of $1,005 at January 31, 2009 and $975 at
February 2, 2008, respectively, from a life insurance trust fund controlled by
the Company’s Chairman. The note was created over three years,
beginning in July 1994, when the Company paid life insurance premiums of $200
each year for the Chairman on a personal policy. The note accrues
interest at 5% of the principal balance per year and is to be paid from the life
insurance proceeds. The note is secured by a life insurance policy on
the Chairman.
46
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
H.
|
COMMITMENTS
|
Leases -
The Company conducts its operations in leased facilities under numerous
non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through fiscal
2020. Most of the Company’s stores have lease terms of approximately
ten years and generally do not contain renewal options. Most lease
agreements contain tenant improvement allowances, rent holidays, lease premiums,
rent escalation clauses, and/or rent provisions. For purposes of
recognizing incentives, premiums, and minimum rental expenses on a straight-line
basis over the terms of the leases, the Company uses the date of initial
possession to begin amortization, which is generally when the Company enters the
space and begins to make improvements in preparation of intended
use. Operating lease base rental expense for fiscal 2008, 2007, and
2006 was $41,687, $38,298, and $36,093, respectively. Most of the
rental payments are based on a minimum annual rental plus a percentage of sales
in excess of a specified amount. Percentage rents for fiscal 2008,
2007, and 2006 were $3,202, $1,159, and $554, respectively.
Total
future minimum rental commitments under these operating leases with remaining
lease terms in excess of one year as of January 31, 2009 are as
follows:
Minimum Rental
|
||||
Fiscal
Year
|
Commitments
|
|||
2009
|
$ | 43,398 | ||
2010
|
37,376 | |||
2011
|
31,936 | |||
2012
|
28,039 | |||
2013
|
24,701 | |||
Thereafter
|
74,819 | |||
Total
minimum lease payments required
|
$ | 240,269 |
Litigation
- From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation relating to claims
arising out of its operations in the normal course of business. As of
the date of these financial statements, the Company was not engaged in any legal
proceedings that are expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a
material effect on the Company.
I.
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS
|
The
Company has a 401(k) profit sharing plan covering all eligible employees who
elect to participate. Contributions to the plan are based upon the
amount of the employees’ deferrals and the employer’s discretionary matching
formula. The Company may contribute to the plan at its
discretion. The total expense under the profit sharing plan was
$1,022, $887, and $572 for fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively.
The
Buckle, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan covers the Company’s executive
officers. The plan is funded by participant contributions and a
specified annual Company matching contribution not to exceed 6% of the
participant’s compensation. The Company’s contributions were $341,
$390, and $153 for fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively.
47
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
J.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
The
Company has several stock option plans which allow for granting of stock options
to employees, executives, and directors. The options are in the form
of non-qualified stock options and are granted with an exercise price equal to
the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The options
generally expire ten years from the date of grant. The Company also
has a restricted stock plan that allows for the granting of non-vested shares of
common stock to employees and executives.
As of
January 31, 2009, 637,126 shares were available for grant under the various
stock option plans, of which 452,502 were available for grant to executive
officers. Also as of January 31, 2009, 314,940 shares were available
for grant under the Company’s 2005 Restricted Stock Plan, all of which were
available for grant to executive officers. On May 28, 2008,
shareholders also approved the Company’s 2008 Director Restricted Stock
Plan. The plan is designed to replace the annual stock option grants
historically made to non-employee directors under the Company’s 1993 Director
Stock Option Plan with annual grants of restricted shares beginning with the
grants scheduled to be made on the first day of fiscal 2009. A total
of 90,000 shares have been reserved for issuance under the plan.
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB Statement
No. 123 (revised 2004) (“SFAS 123(R)”), Share-Based
Payment. Compensation expense was recognized in fiscal 2008,
2007, and 2006 for new awards, based on the grant date fair value, as well as
for the portion of awards granted in fiscal years prior to SFAS 123(R) adoption
that was not vested as of the beginning of fiscal 2006. The fair
value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model, while the fair value of grants of non-vested common stock awards is the
stock price on the date of grant.
Information
regarding the impact of stock-based compensation expense is as
follows:
Fiscal Year Ended
|
||||||||||||
January 31,
|
February 2,
|
February 3,
|
||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense, before tax
|
||||||||||||
Stock
options
|
$ | 289 | $ | 293 | $ | 2,510 | ||||||
Non-vested
shares of common stock
|
4,879 | 3,886 | 2,695 | |||||||||
Total
stock-based compensation expense, before tax
|
$ | 5,168 | $ | 4,179 | $ | 5,205 | ||||||
Total
stock-based compensation expense, after tax
|
$ | 3,256 | $ | 2,633 | $ | 3,279 |
Stock
option compensation expense is allocated to cost of sales, selling expenses, and
general and administrative expenses in a method similar to that of allocating
accrued incentive bonus expense. Expense related to grants of
non-vested shares of common stock is included in general and administrative
expenses. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, the vesting of
605,000 stock options was accelerated by the achievement of a market performance
feature pursuant to the stock option plan and the award
agreements. The accelerated vesting triggered the early recognition
of $1,066 of stock option compensation expense related to the stock option
grants, which the Company had been recording on a straight line basis over the
previously expected remaining vesting period through December 30,
2008.
48
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
SFAS
123(R) requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of the compensation
cost recognized for stock options exercised during the period to be classified
as financing cash inflows. This amount is shown as “excess tax
benefit from stock option exercises” on the statements of cash
flows. For fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, the excess tax benefit
realized from exercised stock options was $11,268, $7,744, and $4,789,
respectively.
Stock
options granted during fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006 were granted under the
Company’s 1993 Director Stock Option Plan. Grants were made with an
exercise price equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock on the
date of grant and a contractual term of ten years. Options granted
under the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan typically vest over a period of three
years.
The
weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the fiscal year
was $12.61, $12.81, and $9.97 per option for fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively. The fair value of options granted was estimated at the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions:
Fiscal Years
Ended
|
||||||||||||
January 31,
2009
|
February 2,
2008
|
February 3,
2007
|
||||||||||
Risk-free
interest rate (1)
|
3.10 | % | 4.80 | % | 4.50 - 5.00 | % | ||||||
Dividend yield (2)
|
2.40 | % | 2.40 | % | 1.60 - 2.00 | % | ||||||
Expected volatility (3)
|
33.00 | % | 39.00 | % | 45.00 | % | ||||||
Expected lives - years
(4)
|
7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 |
(1)
|
Based
on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant with a
term consistent with the expected lives of stock
options.
|
(2)
|
Based
on expected dividend yield as of the date of
grant.
|
(3)
|
Based
on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over a period
consistent with the expected lives of
options.
|
(4)
|
Based
on historical and expected exercise
behavior.
|
On
December 11, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized a $3.00 per share ($1.33
per share after adjustment for 3-for-2 stock splits) special one-time cash
dividend to be paid on January 2, 2007 to shareholders of record at the close of
business on December 22, 2006. Additionally, on September 15, 2008,
the Board of Directors authorized another $3.00 per share ($2.00 per share after
3-for-2 stock split) special one-time cash dividend to be paid on October 27,
2008 to shareholders of record at the close of business on October 15,
2008. To preserve the intrinsic value for option holders, the Board
also approved on each occasion, pursuant to the terms of the Company’s various
stock option plans, a proportional adjustment to both the exercise price and the
number of shares covered by each award for all outstanding stock
options. These adjustments did not result in any incremental
compensation expense.
49
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
A summary
of the Company’s stock-based compensation activity related to stock options for
the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 is as follows:
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Average
|
||||||||||||
Average
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
|||||||||||
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
|||||||||||
Shares
|
Price
|
Life
|
Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
- beginning of year
|
3,085,842 | $ | 8.48 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
40,500 | 28.01 | |||||||||||
Other
(1)
|
422 | 9.34 | |||||||||||
Expired/forfeited
|
(254 | ) | 10.65 | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
( 1 ,491,347 | ) | 8.53 | ||||||||||
Outstanding
- end of year
|
1 ,635,163 | $ | 6.91 |
4.14
years
|
$ |
23,458
|
|||||||
Exercisable
- end of year
|
1,584,300 | $ | 6.37 |
3.99
years
|
$ |
23,445
|
(1)
|
Adjustments
were made to the exercise price and number of option outstanding for both
the special cash dividend and 3-for-2 stock split during the third quarter
of fiscal 2008. Historical information in this table has been adjusted to
reflect the 3-for-2 stock split. "Other" represents additional options
issued as a result of the special cash dividend in October
2008.
|
The total
intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively, was $35,447, $23,135, and $14,656. As of January 31,
2009, there was $239 of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested
stock options. It is expected that this expense will be recognized
over a weighted average period of approximately 1.7 years.
Non-vested
shares of common stock granted during fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006 were granted
pursuant to the Company’s 2005 Restricted Stock Plan. Shares granted
under the plan typically vest over a period of four years, only upon
certification by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors that the
Company has achieved it pre-established performance targets for the fiscal
year.
50
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
A summary
of the Company’s stock-based compensation activity related to grants of
non-vested shares of common stock for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 is
as follows:
Weighted Average
|
||||||||
Grant Date
|
||||||||
Shares
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||
Non-Vested
- beginning of year
|
434,417 | $ | 18.96 | |||||
Granted
|
210,075 | 28.01 | ||||||
Forfeited
|
(465 | ) | 20.57 | |||||
Vested
|
(220,856 | ) | 18.21 | |||||
Non-Vested
- end of year
|
423,171 | $ | 23.84 |
As of
January 31, 2009, there was $4,052 of unrecognized compensation expense related
to grants of non-vested shares. It is expected that this expense will
be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.0 years. The
total fair value of shares vested during fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006 was $5,128,
$4,398, and $1,480, respectively.
K.
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
The
following table provides reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per
share:
Fiscal
Years Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
January
31, 2009
|
February
2, 2008
|
February
3, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Per
|
Weighted
|
Per
|
Weighted
|
Per
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Share
|
Average
|
Share
|
Average
|
Share
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Income
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Income
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 104,409 | 45,367 | $ | 2.30 | $ | 75,247 | 44,551 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 55,726 | 43,353 | $ | 1.29 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effect
of Dilutive
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
options and non-vested shares
|
- | 1,207 | (0.06 | ) | - | 1,703 | (0.06 | ) | - | 1,668 | (0.05 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
$ | 104,409 | 46,574 | $ | 2.24 | $ | 75,247 | 46,254 | $ | 1.63 | $ | 55,726 | 45,021 | $ | 1.24 |
Stock
options to purchase 72,637 shares of common stock were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share for fiscal 2008 because the options
would be considered anti-dilutive. No stock options were deemed
anti-dilutive and excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share
for fiscal 2007 or 2006.
51
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
L.
|
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
|
The
Company is a retailer of medium to better-priced casual apparel, footwear, and
accessories. The Company operated 387 stores located in 39 states
throughout the continental United States as of January 31, 2009. The
Company operates its business as one segment.
The
following is information regarding the Company’s major product lines and is
stated as a percentage of the Company’s net sales:
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
January 31,
|
February 2,
|
February 3,
|
||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Denims
|
41.4 | % | 43.2 | % | 44.6 | % | ||||||
Tops
(including sweaters)
|
39.0 | 36.1 | 31.0 | |||||||||
Accessories
|
7.7 | 7.7 | 9.2 | |||||||||
Footwear
|
4.6 | 5.6 | 7.0 | |||||||||
Sportswear/fashions
|
4.6 | 4.3 | 3.9 | |||||||||
Outerwear
|
2.0 | 2.0 | 2.3 | |||||||||
Casual bottoms | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.9 | |||||||||
Other
|
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
M.
|
SELECTED
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(UNAUDITED)
|
Selected
unaudited quarterly financial information for fiscal 2008 and 2007 are as
follows:
Quarter
|
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal
2008
|
First
|
Second
|
Third
|
Fourth
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 160,300 | $ | 169,765 | $ | 210,567 | $ | 251,414 | ||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ | 65,622 | $ | 70,268 | $ | 91,805 | $ | 115,793 | ||||||||
Net
income (1)
|
$ | 18,717 | $ | 22,276 | $ | 29,076 | $ | 34,340 | ||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||||
$ | 0.41 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.62 | $ | 0.74 |
Quarter
|
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal
2007
|
First
|
Second
|
Third
|
Fourth
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 121,111 | $ | 124,257 | $ | 167,559 | $ | 206,961 | ||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ | 45,503 | $ | 46,413 | $ | 70,749 | $ | 91,873 | ||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 12,193 | $ | 11,792 | $ | 22,198 | $ | 29,064 | ||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.27 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.65 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.27 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.63 |
Basic and
diluted shares outstanding are computed independently for each of the quarters
presented and, therefore, may not sum to the totals for the year.
(1) Results
for the third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 include other-than-temporary
impairment of $1,800 and $3,357 ($1,134 and $2,115 net of tax), respectively,
for unrealized losses recorded on certain of the Company’s auction-rate and
preferred securities.
52
ITEM
9 - CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM
9A - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The
Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are
designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information, which is
required to be timely disclosed, is accumulated and communicated to management
in a timely manner. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) was
performed as of the end of the period covered by this report. This
evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based
upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
Company’s reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated
and communicated to management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that such
information is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms.
Change in Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting – There were no changes in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.
Management’s Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Management of the Company is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over
financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United State of America (“GAAP”).
All
internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent
limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective
can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement
preparation and presentation. Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements.
Management
has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of January 31, 2009, based on the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission in
their Internal
Control–Integrated Framework. In making its assessment of
internal control over financial reporting, management has concluded that the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January
31, 2009.
The
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche
LLP, has audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting. Their report appears herein.
53
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The
Buckle, Inc.
Kearney,
Nebraska
We have
audited the internal control over financial reporting of The Buckle, Inc. (the
“Company”) as of January 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all
material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness
of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A
company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or
under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal
financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the
company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting,
including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of
controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of
the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future
periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
In our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009, based on the criteria
established in Internal
Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have
also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the financial statements and financial
statement schedule as of and for the year ended January 31, 2009 of the Company
and our report dated March 30, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion
on the financial statements and financial statement schedule.
/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE
& TOUCHE LLP
Omaha,
Nebraska
March 30,
2009
54
ITEM
9B – OTHER INFORMATION
As
required by Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange’s Corporate Governance
Standards, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer submitted a certification to
the New York Stock Exchange in fiscal 2008 that he was not aware of any
violation by the Company of the New York Stock Exchange’s Corporate Governance
Standards as of the date of the certification, June 30, 2008.
PART
III
ITEM
10 – DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The
information required by this item appears under the captions "Executive Officers
of the Company" appearing on pages 10 and 11 of this report and "Election of
Directors" in the Company's Proxy Statement for its 2009 Annual Shareholders'
Meeting and is incorporated by reference.
ITEM
11- EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information
required by this item appears under the following captions in the Company's
Proxy Statement for its 2009 Annual Shareholders' Meeting and is incorporated by
reference: “Executive Compensation and Other Information,” “Directors
Compensation” (included under the “Election of Directors” section) and “Report
of the Audit Committee,” including sub-captions “Option Grants in Last Fiscal
Year,” “Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year End
Option Values,” “Employment Agreements” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks
and Insider Participation.”
ITEM
12 - SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The
information required by this item appears under the captions "Election of
Directors" in the Company's Proxy Statement for its 2009 Annual Shareholders'
Meeting and in the Notes to Financial Statements under Footnote J on pages 48 to
51 of this report and is incorporated by reference.
ITEM
13 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The
information required by this item appears under the caption "Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" in the Company's Proxy for its
2009 Annual Shareholders' Meeting and is incorporated by reference.
ITEM
14 – PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information
regarding the fees billed by our independent registered public accounting firm
and the nature of services comprising the fees for each of the two most recent
fiscal years is set forth under the caption “Ratification of Independent
Accountants” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2009 Annual Shareholders'
Meeting and is incorporated by reference.
PART
IV
ITEM
15 – EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
(a)
Financial Statement Schedule
Valuation
and Qualifying Account. This schedule is on page 57.
All other
schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required
information is presented in the financial statements or notes
thereto.
(b) Exhibits
See index
to exhibits on pages 58 and 59.
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
|
||
Date: April
1, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ DENNIS H. NELSON
|
Dennis
H. Nelson,
|
||
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
Date: April
1, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ KAREN B. RHOADS
|
Karen
B. Rhoads,
|
||
Vice
President of Finance, Treasurer,
|
||
and
Principal Accounting Officer
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities indicated on the 1st day of
April, 2009.
/s/ DANIEL J. HIRSCHFELD
|
||
Daniel
J. Hirschfeld
|
Bill
L. Fairfield
|
|
Chairman
of the Board and Director
|
Director
|
|
/s/ DENNIS H. NELSON
|
||
Dennis
H. Nelson
|
Ralph
M. Tysdal
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
Director
|
|
and
Director
|
||
/s/ KAREN B. RHOADS
|
||
Karen
B. Rhoads
|
Bruce
L. Hoberman
|
|
Vice
President of Finance and
|
Director
|
|
Principal
Accounting Officer and Director
|
||
/s/ JOHN P. PEETZ
|
||
John
P. Peetz, III
|
David
A. Roehr
|
|
Director
|
Director
|
|
/s/ ROBERT E. CAMPBELL
|
||
Robert
E. Campbell
|
||
Director
|
56
SCHEDULE
II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
Allowance
for
|
||||
Doubtful Accounts
|
||||
Balance
January 28, 2006
|
$ | 94,000 | ||
Amounts
charged to costs and expenses
|
237,598 | |||
Write-off
of uncollectible accounts
|
(259,598 | ) | ||
Balance,
February 3, 2007
|
72,000 | |||
Amounts
charged to costs and expenses
|
328,377 | |||
Write-off
of uncollectible accounts
|
(338,377 | ) | ||
Balance,
February 2, 2008
|
62,000 | |||
Amounts
charged to costs and expenses
|
275,558 | |||
Write-off
of uncollectible accounts
|
(291,558 | ) | ||
Balance,
January 31, 2009
|
$ | 46,000 |
57
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
Exhibits
|
Page Number or Incorporation
|
|||
by Reference to
|
||||
(3)
|
Articles of
Incorporation and By-Laws.
|
|||
(3.1)
|
Articles
of Incorporation
|
Exhibit
3.1 to Form S-1
|
||
of
The Buckle, Inc. as amended
|
No.
33-46294
|
|||
(3.1.1)
|
Amendment
to the Articles of
|
|||
Incorporation
of The Buckle, Inc.
|
||||
(3.2)
|
By-Laws
of The Buckle, Inc.
|
Exhibit
3.2 to Form S-1
|
||
No.
33-46294
|
||||
(4)
|
Instruments
defining the rights of security
|
|||
holders,
including indentures
|
||||
(4.1)
|
See
Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 for provisions
|
|||
of
the Articles of Incorporation and
|
||||
By-laws
of the Registrant defining rights
|
||||
of
holders of Common Stock of the registrant
|
||||
(4.2)
|
Form
of stock certificate for Common Stock
|
Exhibit
4.1 to Form S-1
|
||
No.
33-46294
|
||||
(9)
|
Not
applicable
|
|||
(10)
|
Material
Contracts
|
|||
(10.1)
|
1991
Stock Incentive Plan
|
Exhibit
10.1 to Form S-1
|
||
No.
33-46294
|
||||
(10.2)
|
1991
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan
|
Exhibit
10.2 to Form S-1
|
||
No.
33-46294
|
||||
(10.3)
|
Non-Qualified
Stock Option Plan and
|
Exhibit
10.3 to Form S-1
|
||
Agreement
With Dennis Nelson
|
No.
33-46294
|
|||
(10.4)
|
Acknowledgment
for Dennis H. Nelson
|
|||
dated
April 1, 2009
|
||||
(10.5)
|
Acknowledgment
for Karen B. Rhoads
|
|||
dated
April 1, 2009
|
||||
(10.6)
|
Acknowledgment
for Brett P. Milkie
|
|||
dated
April 1, 2009
|
||||
(10.7)
|
Acknowledgment
for Patricia K. Whisler
|
|||
dated
April 1, 2009
|
||||
(10.8)
|
Acknowledgment
for Kari G. Smith
|
|||
dated
April 1, 2009
|
||||
(10.10)
|
Cash
or Deferred Profit Sharing Plan
|
Exhibit
10.10 to Form S-1
|
||
No.
33-46294
|
||||
(10.10.1)
|
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|||
(10.11)
|
Revolving
Line of Credit Note and First
|
Exhibit
10.11 to Form 10-K
|
||
Amendment
to Credit Agreement, dated
|
filed
for the fiscal year ended
|
|||
August
1, 2006 between The Buckle, Inc. and
|
February
3, 2007
|
|||
Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. for a $17.5 million
|
||||
line
of credit
|
||||
58
(10.17)
|
1993
Director Stock Option Plan
|
Exhibit
B to Proxy Statement
|
||
Amended
and Restated
|
for
Annual Meeting held
|
|||
June
2, 2006
|
||||
(10.23)
|
1997
Executive Stock Option Plan
|
Exhibit
B to Proxy Statement
|
||
for
Annual Meeting held
|
||||
May
28, 1998
|
||||
(10.24)
|
1998
Restricted Stock Plan
|
Exhibit
C to Proxy Statement
|
||
for
Annual Meeting held
|
||||
May
28, 1998
|
||||
(10.28)
|
2005
Restricted Stock Plan
|
Exhibit
B to Proxy Statement
|
||
for
Annual Meeting held
|
||||
June
2, 2005
|
||||
(10.29)
|
2007
Executive Incentive Plan
|
Exhibit
A to Proxy Statement
|
||
for
Annual Meeting held
|
||||
May
31, 2007
|
||||
(10.30)
|
2008
Executive Incentive Plan
|
Exhibit
A to Proxy Statement
|
||
for
Annual Meeting held
|
||||
May
28, 2008
|
||||
(10.31)
|
2008
Director Restricted Stock Plan
|
Exhibit
B to Proxy Statement
|
||
For
Annual Meeting held
|
||||
May
28, 2008
|
(11)
|
Not
applicable
|
|
(12)
|
Not
applicable
|
|
(13)
|
Not
applicable
|
|
(14)
|
Not
applicable
|
|
(16)
|
Not
applicable
|
|
(18)
|
Not
applicable
|
|
(19)
|
Not
applicable
|
|
(21)
|
Not
applicable
|
|
(22)
|
Not
applicable
|
|
(23)
|
Consent
of Deloitte & Touche LLP
|
|
(25)
|
Not
applicable
|
|
(28)
|
Not
applicable
|
|
(31a)
|
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
|
|
Under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted
|
||
Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
||
(31b)
|
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
|
|
Under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted
|
||
Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
||
(32)
|
Certifications
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
|
|
Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
|
||
Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
59