BUCKLE INC - Annual Report: 2010 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
x ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
Fiscal Year Ended January 30,
2010
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
Transition Period from ____________ to ____________
Commission File Number: 001-12951
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Nebraska
|
47-0366193
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
2407
West 24th Street, Kearney, Nebraska
|
68845-4915
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code: (308) 236-8491
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of class
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which
Registered
|
Common
Stock, $0.01 par value
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes þ No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for a shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes ¨ No
¨
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K ¨.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer, non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. (See definition of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Check one.
þ Large accelerated
filer; ¨
Accelerated filer; ¨
Non-accelerated filer; ¨
Smaller Reporting Company
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨No
þ
The
aggregate market value (based on the closing price of the New York Stock
Exchange) of the common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the
registrant was $785,519,774 on July 31, 2009. For purposes of this response,
executive officers and directors are deemed to be the affiliates of the
Registrant and the holdings by non-affiliates was computed as 25,388,487
shares.
The
number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's Common Stock, as of March 26,
2010, was 46,659,195.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the definitive Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 2010 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held June 4, 2010 are incorporated by reference in Part
III.
The
Buckle, Inc.
Form
10-K
January
30, 2010
Table
of Contents
Page
|
|||
Part
I
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Business
|
3
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
11
|
|
Item
1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
14
|
|
Item
2.
|
Properties
|
15
|
|
Item
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
15
|
|
Item
4.
|
Reserved
|
15
|
|
Part
II
|
|||
Item
5.
|
Market
for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters, and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
16
|
|
Item
6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
18
|
|
Item
7.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
19
|
|
Item
7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
29
|
|
Item
8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
30
|
|
Item
9.
|
Changes
In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
50
|
|
Item
9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
50
|
|
Item
9B.
|
Other
Information
|
52
|
|
Part
III
|
|||
Item
10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
|
52
|
|
Item
11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
52
|
|
Item
12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
52
|
|
Item
13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions and Director
Independence
|
52
|
|
Item
14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
52
|
|
Part
IV
|
|||
Item
15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedule
|
52
|
2
PART
I
ITEM
1 - BUSINESS
The
Buckle, Inc. (the "Company") is a retailer of medium to better-priced casual
apparel, footwear, and accessories for fashion conscious young men and women. As
of January 30, 2010, the Company operated 401 retail stores in 41 states
throughout the continental United States under the names "Buckle" and "The
Buckle." The Company markets a wide selection of mostly brand name
casual apparel including denims, other casual bottoms, tops, sportswear,
outerwear, accessories, and footwear. The Company emphasizes personalized
attention to its customers and provides customer services such as free hemming,
free gift-wrapping, easy layaways, the Buckle private label credit card, and a
frequent shopper program. Most stores are located in regional, high-traffic
shopping malls and lifestyle centers, and this is the Company's strategy for
future expansion. The majority of the Company's central office functions,
including purchasing, pricing, accounting, advertising, and distribution, are
controlled from its headquarters and distribution center in Kearney, Nebraska.
The Company’s men’s buying team and a portion of its marketing team are located
in Overland Park, Kansas.
Incorporated
in Nebraska in 1948, the Company commenced business under the name Mills
Clothing, Inc., a conventional men's clothing store with only one location. In
1967, a second store, under the trade name Brass Buckle, was purchased. In the
early 1970s, the store image changed to that of a jeans store with a wide
selection of denims and shirts. The first branch store was opened in Columbus,
Nebraska, in 1976. In 1977, the Company began selling young women's apparel and
opened its first mall store. The Company changed its corporate name to The
Buckle, Inc. on April 23, 1991. The Company has experienced significant growth
over the past ten years, growing from 248 stores at the start of 2000 to 401
stores at the end of fiscal 2009. All references herein to fiscal 2009 refer to
the 52-week period ended January 30, 2010. Fiscal 2008 refers to the 52-week
period ended January 31, 2009 and fiscal 2007 refers to the 52-week period ended
February 2, 2008.
The
Company's principal executive offices and distribution center are located at
2407 West 24th Street, Kearney, Nebraska 68845. The Company's telephone number
is (308) 236-8491. The Company publishes its corporate web site at www.buckle.com.
Available
Information
The
Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, along with all other reports and
amendments filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission,
are publicly available free of charge on the Investor Information section of the
Company’s website at www.buckle.com as
soon as reasonably practicable after the Company files such materials with, or
furnishes them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company’s
corporate governance policies, ethics code, and Board of Directors’ committee
charters are also posted within this section of the website. The information on
the Company’s website is not part of this or any other report The Buckle, Inc.
files with, or furnishes to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Marketing
and Merchandising
The
Company's marketing and merchandising strategy is designed to create customer
loyalty by offering a wide selection of key brand name and private label
merchandise and providing a broad range of value-added services. The Company
believes it provides a unique specialty apparel store experience with
merchandise designed to appeal to the fashion conscious 15 to 30-year old. The
merchandise mix includes denims, casual bottoms, tops, sportswear, outerwear,
accessories, and footwear. Denim is a significant contributor to total sales
(42.9% of fiscal 2009 net sales) and is a key to the Company's merchandising
strategy. The Company believes it attracts customers with its wide selection of
branded and private label denim and a wide variety of fits, finishes, and
styles. Tops are also significant contributors to total sales (36.7% of fiscal
2009 net sales). The Company strives to provide a continually changing selection
of the latest casual fashions.
3
The
percentage of net sales over the past three fiscal years of the Company's major
product lines are set forth in the following table:
Percentage of Net Sales
|
||||||||||||
Fiscal 2009
|
Fiscal 2008
|
Fiscal 2007
|
||||||||||
Denims
|
42.9 | % | 41.4 | % | 43.2 | % | ||||||
Tops
(including sweaters)
|
36.7 | 39.0 | 36.1 | |||||||||
Accessories
|
7.7 | 7.7 | 7.7 | |||||||||
Sportswear/fashions
|
5.0 | 4.6 | 4.3 | |||||||||
Footwear
|
4.7 | 4.6 | 5.6 | |||||||||
Outerwear
|
2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |||||||||
Casual
bottoms
|
0.4 | 0.6 | 1.0 | |||||||||
Other
|
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
Brand
name merchandise accounted for approximately 71% of the Company's sales during
fiscal 2009. The remaining balance is comprised of private label merchandise.
The Company's merchandisers continually work with manufacturers and vendors to
produce brand name merchandise that they believe is unique in color, style, and
fit. While the brands offered by the Company change to meet current customer
preferences, the Company currently offers denims from brands such as Big Star,
Big Star Vintage, Miss Me, MEK, Rock Revival, and Silver Jeans. Other key brands
include Hurley, Billabong, Affliction, Sinful, Archaic, Obey, 7 Diamonds, Roar,
Fox, and Fossil. The Company expects that brand name merchandise will continue
to constitute the majority of sales.
Management
believes the Company provides a unique store environment by maintaining a high
level of personalized service and by offering a wide selection of fashionable,
quality merchandise. The Company believes it is essential to create an enjoyable
shopping environment and, in order to fulfill this mission, it employs highly
motivated employees who provide personal attention to customers. Each
salesperson is educated to help create a complete look for the customer by
helping them find the best fits and showing merchandise as coordinating outfits.
The Company also incorporates specialized services such as free hemming, free
gift wrapping, layaways, a frequent shopper card, the Buckle private label
credit card, and a special order system that allows stores to obtain
specifically requested merchandise from other Company stores. Customers are
encouraged to use the Company's layaway plan, which allows customers to make a
partial payment on merchandise that is then held by the store until the balance
is paid. For the past three fiscal years, an average of approximately 2% – 4% of
net sales has been made on a layaway basis.
Merchandising
and pricing decisions are made centrally; however, the Company's distribution
system allows for variation in the mix of merchandise distributed to each store.
This allows individual store inventories to be tailored to reflect differences
in customer buying patterns at various locations. In addition, to assure a
continually fresh look in its stores, the Company ships new merchandise daily to
most stores. The Company also has a transfer program that shifts certain
merchandise to locations where it is selling best. This distribution and
transfer system helps to maintain customer satisfaction by providing in-stock
popular items and reducing the need to mark down slow-moving merchandise at a
particular location. The Company believes the reduced markdowns justify the
incremental distribution costs associated with the transfer system. The Company
does not hold storewide off-price sales at anytime.
The
Company continually evaluates its store design as part of the overall shopping
experience and feels the fiscal 2002 re-design continues to be well received by
both guests and developers. This store design contains warm wood fixtures and
floors, real brick finishes, and an appealing ceiling and lighting layout that
creates a comfortable environment for the guest to shop. The Company has been
able to modify the store design for specialized venues including lifestyle
centers and larger mall fronts. The signature Buckle-B icon and red color are
used throughout the store on fixtures, graphic images, and print materials to
reinforce the brand identity. To enhance selling and product presentation, new
tables and fixtures have been added to the Company’s signature store design in
each of the last five fiscal years. The new tables and fixtures were also rolled
out to select existing stores to update their looks as well.
4
Marketing
and Advertising
In fiscal
2009, the Company spent $8.5 million, or 1.0% of net sales, on seasonal
marketing campaigns, advertising, promotions, online marketing, and in-store
point of sale materials. Seasonal image and promotional signage is presented in
store window displays and on merchandising presentations throughout the store to
complement the product and reinforce the brand's image. Promotions such as
sweepstakes, gift with purchase offers, and special events are offered to
enhance the guest’s shopping experience. Seasonal image guides, featuring
current fashion trends and product selection, are distributed in the stores, at
special events, and in new markets. The Buckle partners with key merchandise
vendors on joint advertising and promotional opportunities that expand the
marketing reach and position the Buckle as the destination store for these
specialty branded fashions.
The
Company also offers programs to strengthen its relationships with loyal guests.
The Company continues to support a frequent shopper program (the Buckle Primo
Card), a rewards program designed to build customer loyalty. Private label
credit card marketing is another avenue for reaching loyal guests. The Company
extends exclusive benefits to active Buckle Cardholders such as bonus rewards
and special targeted mailings. The Buckle continues to build on its B-Rewards
incentive program, which is offered exclusively to Buckle Cardholders.
Qualifying Cardholders are mailed B-Rewards gift cards at the end of each
Rewards period inviting them back into the store at the start of the next
season. In October 2007, the Company launched the Buckle Black credit card
program. The Buckle Black program is an exclusive account for the Company's most
loyal cardholders. To qualify for the Buckle Black program, existing cardholders
must make at least $500 in purchases during a 12 month period using their
account. These guests receive special benefits including free ground shipping on
special orders and online purchases. The Buckle Card marketing program is
partially funded by WFNNB, a third-party bank that owns the Buckle Card
accounts.
The
Company publishes a corporate web site at www.buckle.com. The Company’s web site
serves as a second retail touch-point for cross-channel marketing, reaching a
growing online audience. Buckle.com is an eCommerce enabled channel with an
interactive, entertaining, informative, and brand building environment where
guests can shop, enter sweepstakes, fill out a wish list, find out about career
opportunities, and read the Company’s latest financial news. The Company
maintains an opt-in email database. National email campaigns are sent bi-monthly
and targeted weekly messages are sent notifying guests of the latest store
promotions and product offerings. Search engine and affiliate marketing programs
are managed to increase online and in-store traffic as well as conversion rates.
Buckle’s online store was launched April 26, 1999 as a marketing tool, to extend
the Company’s brand beyond the physical locations. On October 19, 2006, the
Company launched a redesigned Buckle.com on the Escalate E-Commerce platform.
The new Buckle.com includes enhanced search features, which allow guests to shop
by special attributes, including brand and size.
Store
Operations
The
Company has a Vice President of Sales, a Regional Manager, 20 district managers,
and 71 area managers. The majority of the district managers and each of the area
managers also serve as manager of their home base store. In general, each store
has one manager, one or two assistant managers, one to three additional
full-time salespeople, and up to 20 part-time salespeople. Most stores have peak
levels of staff during the back-to-school and Christmas seasons. Almost every
location also employs an alterations person.
The
Company places great importance on educating quality personnel. In addition to
sharing career opportunities with current Buckle employees, the Company also
recruits interns and management trainees from college campuses. A majority of
the Company’s store managers, all of its area and district managers, and most of
its executive management team are former salespeople, including President and
CEO, Dennis H. Nelson, and Chairman, Daniel J. Hirschfeld. Recognizing talent
and promoting managers from within allows the Company to build a strong
foundation for management.
Store
managers receive compensation in the form of a base salary and incentive
bonuses. District and area managers also receive added incentives based upon the
performance of stores in their district/area. Store managers perform sales
training for new employees at the store level.
5
The
Company has established a comprehensive program stressing the prevention and
control of shrinkage losses. Steps taken to reduce shrinkage include monitoring
cash refunds, voids, inappropriate discounts, employee sales, and
returns-to-vendor. The Company also has electronic article surveillance systems
in all of the Company’s stores as well as surveillance camera systems in
approximately 99% of the stores. As a result, the Company achieved a merchandise
shrinkage rate of 0.5% of net sales in each of the last three fiscal
years.
The
average store is approximately 5,000 square feet (of which the Company estimates
an average of approximately 80% is selling space), and stores range in size from
2,900 square feet to 8,475 square feet.
Purchasing
and Distribution
The
Company has an experienced buying team. The buying team includes the President,
Vice President of Women’s Merchandising, Vice President of Men’s Merchandising,
nine women’s buyers, and nine men’s buyers. The two Vice Presidents of
Merchandising have over 59 years of combined experience with the Company. The
experience and leadership within the buying team contributes significantly to
the Company’s success by enabling the buying team to react quickly to changes in
fashion and by providing extensive knowledge of sources for both branded and
private label goods.
The
Company purchases products from manufacturers within the United States as well
as from agents who source goods from foreign manufacturers. The Company's
merchandising team shops and monitors U.S. fashion centers (in New York and on
the West Coast) to stay abreast of the latest trends. The Company continually
monitors fabric selection, quality, and delivery schedules. The Company has not
experienced any material difficulties with merchandise manufactured in foreign
countries. The Company does not have long-term or exclusive contracts with any
brand name manufacturer, private label manufacturer, or supplier. The Company
plans its private label production with private label vendors three to six
months in advance of product delivery. The Company requires its vendors to sign
and adhere to its Code of Conduct and Standards of Engagement, which addresses
adherence to legal requirements regarding employment practices and health,
safety, and environmental regulations.
In fiscal
2009, Koos Manufacturing, Inc. (the Company that produces the majority of the
Company’s private label denim as well as the Big Star and Big Star Vintage
branded merchandise) made up 29.3% of the Company’s net sales. No other vendor
accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s net sales. Other current
significant vendors include Miss Me, MEK, Rock Revival, Silver Jeans, Hurley,
Billabong, Affliction, Sinful, Archaic, Obey, 7 Diamonds, Roar, Fox, and Fossil.
The Company continually strives to offer brands that are currently popular with
its customers and, therefore, the Company's suppliers and purchases from
specific vendors may vary significantly from year to year.
Buckle
stores generally carry the same merchandise, with quantity and seasonal
variations based upon historical sales data, climate, and perceived local
customer demand. The Company uses a centralized receiving and distribution
center located within the corporate headquarters building in Kearney, Nebraska.
Merchandise is received daily in Kearney where it is sorted, tagged with
bar-coded tickets (unless the vendor UPC code is used or the merchandise is
pre-ticketed), and packaged for distribution to individual stores primarily via
United Parcel Service. The Company's goal is to ship the majority of its
merchandise out to the stores within one to two business days of receipt. This
system allows stores to receive new merchandise almost daily, creating
excitement within the store and providing customers with a reason to shop
often.
The
Company has developed an effective computerized system for tracking merchandise
from the time it is checked in at the Company's distribution center until it
arrives at the stores and is sold to a customer. The system's function is to
insure that store shipments are delivered accurately and promptly, to account
for inventory, and to assist in allocating merchandise among stores. Management
can track, on a daily basis, which merchandise is selling at specific locations
and direct transfers of merchandise from one store to another as necessary. This
allows stores to carry a reduced inventory while at the same time satisfying
customer demand.
6
To reduce
inter-store shipping costs and provide timely restocking of in-season
merchandise, the Company warehouses a portion of initial shipments for later
distribution. Sales reports are then used to replenish, on a basis of one to
three times each week, those stores that are experiencing the greatest success
selling specific styles, colors, and sizes of merchandise. This system is also
designed to prevent an over-crowded look in the stores at the beginning of a
season.
The
Company completed an 82,200 square foot expansion to its corporate headquarters
facility during fiscal 2005, which housed its online fulfillment and customer
service center as well as its supplies and returns-to-vendor departments. In
March 2009, the Company relocated its supplies and returns-to-vendor departments
to begin an expansion of the current online fulfillment infrastructure. The
newly expanded online fulfillment center went live in June 2009 and the
expansion approximately doubled the size of the previous infrastructure – which
now occupies approximately 200,000 square feet of space on three
levels.
In
September 2009, the Company broke ground on a new 240,000 square foot
distribution center in Kearney, Nebraska. The Company is targeting a completion
date of July 2010 for the facility, at which at which point the new distribution
center will replace the Company’s current distribution center.
Store
Locations and Expansion Strategies
As of
March 12, 2010, the Company operated 407 stores in 41 states, including 6 stores
opened during fiscal 2010. The existing stores are in 4 downtown locations, 9
strip centers, 35 lifestyle centers, and 359 shopping malls. The Company
anticipates opening approximately 20 new stores in fiscal 2010. For fiscal 2010,
17 of the new stores are expected to be located in higher traffic shopping malls
and 3 of the new stores are expected to be located in lifestyle centers. The
following table lists the location of existing stores as of March 12,
2010:
Location of Stores
|
||||||||||
State
|
Number of
Stores
|
State
|
Number of
Stores
|
State
|
Number of
Stores
|
|||||
Alabama
|
6
|
Maryland
|
3
|
Oklahoma
|
13
|
|||||
Arizona
|
11
|
Michigan
|
18
|
Oregon
|
4
|
|||||
Arkansas
|
6
|
Minnesota
|
12
|
Pennsylvania
|
9
|
|||||
California
|
18
|
Mississippi
|
5
|
South
Carolina
|
3
|
|||||
Colorado
|
13
|
Missouri
|
13
|
South
Dakota
|
3
|
|||||
Florida
|
20
|
Montana
|
5
|
Tennessee
|
11
|
|||||
Georgia
|
6
|
Nebraska
|
13
|
Texas
|
47
|
|||||
Idaho
|
6
|
Nevada
|
3
|
Utah
|
10
|
|||||
Illinois
|
16
|
New
Jersey
|
2
|
Virginia
|
4
|
|||||
Indiana
|
14
|
New
Mexico
|
4
|
Washington
|
13
|
|||||
Iowa
|
17
|
New
York
|
1
|
West
Virginia
|
3
|
|||||
Kansas
|
17
|
North
Carolina
|
9
|
Wisconsin
|
13
|
|||||
Kentucky
|
5
|
North
Dakota
|
3
|
Wyoming
|
1
|
|||||
Louisiana
|
9
|
Ohio
|
18
|
Total
|
407
|
|||||
The
Buckle has grown significantly over the past ten years, with the number of
stores increasing from 248 at the beginning of 2000 to 401 at the end of fiscal
2009. The Company's plan is to continue expansion by developing the geographic
regions it currently serves and by expanding into contiguous markets. The
Company intends to open new stores only when management believes there is a
reasonable expectation of satisfactory results.
7
The
following table sets forth information regarding store openings and closings
from the beginning of fiscal 2000 through the end of fiscal 2009:
Total Number of Stores Per Year
|
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal
Year
|
Open at start
of year
|
Opened in
Current Year
|
Closed in
Current Year
|
Open at end
of year
|
||||||||||||
2000
|
248 | 28 | 2 | 274 | ||||||||||||
2001
|
274 | 24 | 3 | 295 | ||||||||||||
2002
|
295 | 11 | 2 | 304 | ||||||||||||
2003
|
304 | 16 | 4 | 316 | ||||||||||||
2004
|
316 | 13 | 2 | 327 | ||||||||||||
2005
|
327 | 15 | 4 | 338 | ||||||||||||
2006
|
338 | 17 | 5 | 350 | ||||||||||||
2007
|
350 | 20 | 2 | 368 | ||||||||||||
2008
|
368 | 21 | 2 | 387 | ||||||||||||
2009
|
387 | 20 | 6 | 401 |
The
Company's criteria used when considering a particular location for expansion
include:
1.
|
Market
area, including proximity to existing markets to capitalize on name
recognition;
|
2.
|
Trade
area population (number, average age, and college
population);
|
3.
|
Economic
vitality of market area;
|
4.
|
Mall
location, anchor tenants, tenant mix, and average sales per square
foot;
|
5.
|
Available
location within a mall, square footage, storefront width, and facility of
using the current store
design;
|
6.
|
Availability
of experienced management personnel for the
market;
|
7.
|
Cost
of rent, including minimum rent, common area, and extra
charges;
|
8.
|
Estimated
construction costs, including landlord charge backs and tenant
allowances.
|
The
Company generally seeks sites of 4,250 to 5,000 square feet for its stores. The
projected cost of opening a store is approximately $0.9 million, including
construction costs of approximately $0.7 million (prior to any construction
allowance received) and inventory costs of approximately $0.2 million, net of
accounts payable.
The
Company anticipates opening approximately 20 new stores during fiscal 2010 and
completing approximately 25 remodels. Remodels range from partial to full, with
construction costs for a full remodel being comparable to those of a new store.
Of the stores scheduled for remodeling during fiscal 2010, it is estimated that
all stores will receive full remodeling. The Company anticipates capital
spending of approximately $65 to $70 million during fiscal 2010 for new store
construction, store remodeling, technology updates, completion of the Company’s
new distribution center, and other improvements at the corporate
headquarters.
The
Company plans to expand in 2010 by opening stores in existing markets. The
Company believes that, given the time required for training personnel, staffing
a store, and developing adequate district and regional managers, its current
management infrastructure is sufficient to support its currently planned rate of
growth.
The
Company's ability to expand in the future will depend, in part, on general
business conditions, the ability to find suitable malls with acceptable sites on
satisfactory terms, the availability of financing, and the readiness of trained
store managers. There can be no assurance that the Company's expansion plans
will be fulfilled in whole or in part, or that leases under negotiation for
planned new sites will be obtained on terms favorable to the
Company.
Management
Information Systems
The
Company's management information systems (MIS) and electronic data processing
systems (EDP) consist of a full range of retail, financial, and merchandising
systems, including purchasing, inventory distribution and control, sales
reporting, accounts payable, and merchandise management.
8
The
system includes PC based point-of-sale (POS) registers in each store. These
registers are polled nightly by the central computer (IBM iSeries) using a
virtual private network for collection of comprehensive data, including complete
item-level sales information, employee time clocking, merchandise transfers and
receipts, special orders, supply orders, and returns-to-vendor. In conjunction
with the nightly polling, the central computer sends the PC server messages
from various departments at the Company headquarters and price changes for the
price lookup (“PLU”) file maintained within the POS registers.
Each
weekday morning, the Company initiates an electronic "sweep" of the individual
store bank accounts to the Company's primary concentration account. This allows
the Company to meet its obligations with a minimum of borrowing and invest cash
on a timely basis.
Management
monitors the performance of each of its stores on a continual basis. Daily
information is used to evaluate inventory, determine markdowns, analyze
profitability, and assist management in the scheduling and compensation of
employees.
The PLU
system allows management to control merchandise pricing centrally, permitting
faster and more accurate processing of sales at the store and the monitoring of
specific inventory items to confirm that centralized pricing decisions are
carried out in each of the stores. Management is able to direct all price
changes, including promotional, clearance, and markdowns on a central basis and
estimate the financial impact of such changes.
The
virtual private network for communication with the stores also supports the
Company’s intranet site. The intranet allows stores to view various types of
information from the corporate office. Stores also have access to a variety of
tools such as a product search with pictures, product availability, special
order functions, printable forms, links to transmit various requests and
information to the corporate office, training videos, email, and
information/guidelines from each of the departments at the corporate office. The
Company’s network is also structured so that it can support additional
functionality such as digital video monitoring and digital music content
programming at each store location.
The
Company is committed to the ongoing review of its MIS and EDP systems to
maintain productive, timely information and effective controls. This review
includes testing of new products and systems to assure that the Company is aware
of technological developments. Most important, continual feedback is sought from
every level of the Company to assure that information provided is pertinent to
all aspects of the Company's operations. During fiscal 2010, the company
anticipates the replacement of its current point-of-sale software and hardware
upon completion of successful store testing.
Employees
As of
January 30, 2010, the Company had approximately 7,000 employees - approximately
1,955 of whom were full-time. The Company has an experienced management team and
substantially all of the management team, from store managers through senior
management, began work for the Company on the sales floor. The Company
experiences high turnover of store and distribution center employees, primarily
due to the number of part-time employees. However, the Company has not
experienced significant difficulty in hiring qualified personnel. Of the total
employees, approximately 560 are employed at the corporate headquarters and in
the distribution center. None of the Company's employees are represented by a
union. Management believes that employee relations are good.
The
Company provides medical, dental, life insurance, and long-term disability
plans, as well as a 401(k) and a section 125 cafeteria plan for eligible
employees. An employee must be at least 20 years of age and work a minimum of
1,000 hours during the plan year to be eligible for the 401(k) plan. To be
eligible for the plans, other than the 401(k) Plan, an employee must have worked
for the Company for 98 days or more, and his or her normal workweek must be 35
hours or more. As of January 30, 2010, 1,595 employees participated in the
medical plan, 1,599 in the dental plan, 1,955 in the life insurance plan, 425 in
the supplemental life insurance plan, 1,263 in the long-term disability plan,
and 1,161 in the cafeteria plan. With respect to the medical, dental, and life
insurance plans, the Company pays 80% to 100% of the employee's expected premium
cost plus 20% to 100% of the expected cost of dependent coverage under the
health plan. The exact percentage is based upon the employee's term of
employment and job classification within the Company. In addition, all employees
receive discounts on Company merchandise.
9
Competition
The men's
and women's apparel industries are highly competitive with fashion, selection,
quality, price, location, store environment, and service being the principal
competitive factors. While the Company believes it is able to compete favorably
with other merchandisers, including department stores and specialty retailers,
with respect to each of these factors, the Company believes it competes mainly
on the basis of customer service and merchandise selection.
In the
men's merchandise area, the Company competes primarily with specialty retailers
such as Abercrombie & Fitch, American Eagle Outfitters, Aeropostale,
Hollister, Gap, Pacific Sunwear, and Metropark. The men's market also competes
with certain department stores, such as Dillards, Macy’s, Bon-Ton stores,
Nordstrom, and other local or regional department stores and specialty
retailers, as well as with mail order and internet retailers.
In the
women's merchandise area, the Company competes primarily with specialty
retailers such as Abercrombie & Fitch, American Eagle Outfitters, Express,
Aeropostale, Hollister, Gap, Maurices, Pacific Sunwear, Wet Seal, Forever 21,
Vanity, and Metropark. The women's market also competes with department stores,
such as Dillards, Macy’s, Bon-Ton stores, Nordstrom, and certain local or
regional department stores and specialty retailers, as well as with mail order
and internet retailers.
Many of
the Company's competitors are considerably larger and have substantially greater
financial, marketing, and other resources than the Company, and there is no
assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully with them in the
future. Furthermore, while the Company believes it competes effectively for
favorable site locations and lease terms, competition for prime locations within
a mall is intense.
Trademarks
"BUCKLE”,
“RECLAIM”, “BKE”, and "THE BUCKLE" are federally registered trademarks of the
Company. The Company believes the strength of its trademarks is of considerable
value to its business, and its trademarks are important to its marketing
efforts. The Company intends to protect and promote its trademarks as management
deems appropriate.
Executive
Officers of the Company
The
Executive Officers of the Company are listed below, together with brief accounts
of their experience and certain other information.
Daniel J. Hirschfeld, age 68.
Mr. Hirschfeld is Chairman of the Board of the Company. He has served as
Chairman of the Board since April 19, 1991. Prior to that time, Mr. Hirschfeld
served as President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hirschfeld has been
involved in all aspects of the Company's business, including the development of
the Company's management information systems.
Dennis H. Nelson, age 60. Mr.
Nelson is President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company.
He has held the titles of President and Director since April 19, 1991. Mr.
Nelson was elected Chief Executive Officer on March 17, 1997. Mr. Nelson began
his career with the Company in 1970 as a part-time salesman while he was
attending Kearney State College (now the University of Nebraska - Kearney).
While attending college, he became involved in merchandising and sales
supervision for the Company. Upon graduation from college in 1973, Mr. Nelson
became a full-time employee of the Company and he has worked in all phases of
the Company's operations since that date. Prior to his election as President and
Chief Operating Officer on April 19, 1991, Mr. Nelson performed all of the
functions normally associated with those positions.
Karen B. Rhoads, age 51. Ms.
Rhoads is the Vice President of Finance, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, and
a Director of the Company. Ms. Rhoads was elected a Director on April 19, 1991.
She worked in the corporate offices while attending Kearney State College (now
the University of Nebraska - Kearney) and later worked part-time on the sales
floor. Ms. Rhoads practiced as a CPA for 6 1/2 years, during which time she
began working on tax and accounting matters for the Company as a client. She has
been employed with Buckle since November 1987.
10
Brett P. Milkie, age 50. Mr.
Milkie is Vice President of Leasing. He was elected Vice President of Leasing on
May 30, 1996. Mr. Milkie was a leasing agent for a national retail mall
developer for 6 years prior to joining the Company in January 1992 as Director
of Leasing.
Kari G. Smith, age 46. Ms.
Smith is Vice President of Sales. She has held this position since May 31, 2001.
Ms. Smith joined the Company on May 16, 1978 as a part-time salesperson. Later
she became store manager in Great Bend, Kansas and then began working with other
stores as an area manager. Ms. Smith has continued to develop her involvement
with the sales management team, helping with manager meetings and the
development of new store managers, as well as providing support for store
managers, area managers, and district managers.
Patricia K. Whisler, age 53.
Ms. Whisler is Vice President of Women’s Merchandising. She has held this
position since May 31, 2001. Ms. Whisler joined the Company in February 1976 as
a part-time salesperson and later became manager of a Buckle store before
returning to the corporate office in 1983 to work as part of the growing
merchandising team.
Kyle L. Hanson, age 45. Ms.
Hanson is the Corporate Secretary and General Counsel. She has held this
position since February 2001. Ms. Hanson joined the Company in May 1998 as
General Counsel. She also worked for the Company as a part-time salesperson
while attending Kearney State College (now the University of Nebraska -
Kearney). Ms. Hanson was previously First Vice President and Trial Attorney for
Mutual of Omaha Companies for 2 years and an attorney with the Kutak Rock law
firm in Omaha from 1990 to 1996.
Robert M. Carlberg, age 47.
Mr. Carlberg is Vice President of Men’s Merchandising. He has held this
position since December 11, 2006. Mr. Carlberg started with the Company as a
salesperson and also worked as a store manager and as an area and district
leader while being involved and traveling with the men’s merchandising team. He
has been full-time with the merchandising team since January 2001.
ITEM
1A – RISK FACTORS
Cautionary
Statement Pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and
Risk Factors
Certain
statements herein, including anticipated store openings, trends in or
expectations regarding The Buckle, Inc.’s revenue and net earnings growth,
comparable store sales growth, cash flow requirements, and capital expenditures,
all constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based on currently
available operating, financial, and competitive information and are subject to
various risks and uncertainties. Actual future results and trends may differ
materially depending on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to,
changes in product mix, changes in fashion trends and/or pricing, competitive
factors, general economic conditions, economic conditions in the retail apparel
industry, successful execution of internal performance and expansion plans, and
other risks detailed herein and in The Buckle, Inc.’s other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
A
forward-looking statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of future
events or circumstances, and those future events or circumstances may not occur.
Users should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which
are accurate only as of the date of this report. The Company is under no
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events, or otherwise. In management’s
judgment, the following are material risk factors:
Dependence on Merchandising/Fashion
Sensitivity. The Company’s success is largely dependent upon its ability
to gauge the fashion tastes of its customers and to provide merchandise that
satisfies customer demand in a timely manner. The Company’s failure to
anticipate, identify, or react appropriately and timely to the changes in
fashion trends would reduce the Company’s net sales and profitability.
Misjudgments or unanticipated fashion changes could have a negative impact on
the Company’s image with its customers, which would also reduce the Company’s
net sales and profitability.
11
Dependence on Private Label
Merchandise. Sales from private label merchandise accounted for
approximately 29% of net sales for fiscal 2009 and 28% of net sales for fiscal
2008. The Company may increase or decrease the percentage of net sales from
private label merchandise in the future. The Company’s private label products
generally earn a higher margin than branded products. Thus, reductions in the
private label mix would decrease the Company’s merchandise margins and, as a
result, reduce net earnings.
Fluctuations in Comparable Store Net
Sales Results. The Company’s comparable store net sales results have
fluctuated in the past and are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future.
A variety of factors affect comparable store sales results, including changes in
fashion trends, changes in the Company’s merchandise mix, calendar shifts of
holiday periods, actions by competitors, weather conditions, and general
economic conditions. As a result of these or other factors, the Company’s future
comparable store sales could decrease, reducing overall net sales and
profitability.
Ability to Continue Expansion and
Management of Growth. The Buckle, Inc.’s continued growth depends on its
ability to open and operate stores on a profitable basis and management’s
ability to manage planned expansion. During fiscal 2010, the Company plans to
open 20 new stores. This expansion is dependent upon factors such as the ability
to locate and obtain favorable store sites, negotiate acceptable lease terms,
obtain necessary merchandise, and hire and train qualified management and other
employees. There may be factors outside of the Company’s control that affect the
ability to expand, including general economic conditions. There is no assurance
that the Company will be able to achieve its planned expansion or that such
expansion will be profitable. If the Company fails to manage its store growth,
there would be less growth in the Company’s net sales from new stores and less
growth in profitability. If the Company opens unprofitable store locations,
there could be a reduction in net earnings, even with the resulting growth in
the Company’s net sales.
Reliance on Key Personnel. The
continued success of The Buckle, Inc. is dependent to a significant degree on
the continued service of key personnel, including senior management. The loss of
a member of senior management could create additional expense in covering their
position as well as cause a reduction in net sales, thus reducing net earnings.
The Company’s success in the future will also be dependent upon the Company’s
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. The Company’s failure to
attract and retain qualified personnel could reduce the number of new stores the
Company could open in a year which would cause net sales to decline, could
create additional operating expenses, and could reduce overall profitability for
the Company.
Dependence on a Single Distribution
Facility and Third-Party Carriers. The distribution function for all of
the Company’s stores is handled from a single facility in Kearney, Nebraska. Any
significant interruption in the operation of the distribution facility due to
natural disasters, system failures, or other unforeseen causes would impede the
distribution of merchandise to the stores, causing a decline in store inventory,
a reduction in store sales, and a reduction in Company profitability.
Interruptions in service by common carriers could also delay shipment of goods
to Company store locations. Additionally, there can be no assurance that the
current facilities will be adequate to support the Company’s future
growth.
Reliance on Foreign Sources of
Production. The Company purchases a portion of its private label
merchandise through sourcing agents in foreign markets. In addition, some of the
Company’s domestic vendors manufacture goods overseas. The Company does not have
any long-term merchandise supply contracts and its imports are subject to
existing or potential duties, tariffs, and quotas. The Company faces a variety
of risks associated with doing business overseas including competition for
facilities and quotas, political instability, possible new legislation relating
to imports that could limit the quantity of merchandise that may be imported,
imposition of duties, taxes, and other charges on imports, and local business
practice and political issues which may result in adverse publicity. The
Company’s inability to rely on foreign sources of production due to these or
other causes could reduce the amount of inventory the Company is able to
purchase, hold up the timing on the receipt of new merchandise, and reduce
merchandise margins if comparable inventory is purchased from branded sources.
Any or all of these changes would cause a decrease in the Company’s net sales
and net earnings.
12
Dependence upon Maintaining Sales and
Profit Growth in the Highly Competitive Retail Apparel Industry. The
specialty retail industry is highly competitive. The Company competes primarily
on the basis of fashion, selection, quality, price, location, service, and store
environment. The Company faces a variety of competitive challenges,
including:
· anticipating
and responding timely to changing customer demands and preferences;
|
·
|
effectively
marketing both branded and private label merchandise to consumers in
several diverse market segments and maintaining favorable brand
recognition;
|
|
·
|
providing
unique, high-quality merchandise in styles, colors, and sizes that appeal
to consumers;
|
· sourcing
merchandise efficiently;
· competitively
pricing merchandise and creating customer perception of value;
|
·
|
monitoring
increased labor costs, including increases in health care benefits and
worker’s compensation costs.
|
There is
no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully in the
future.
Reliance on Consumer Spending
Trends. The continued success of the Company depends, in part, upon
numerous factors that impact the levels of individual disposable income and
thus, consumer spending. Factors include the political environment, economic
conditions, employment, consumer debt, interest rates, inflation, and consumer
confidence. A decline in consumer spending, for any reason, could have an
adverse effect on the Company’s net sales, gross profits, and results from
operations.
Modifications and/or Upgrades to
Information Technology Systems May Disrupt Operations. The Company relies
upon its various information systems to manage its operations and regularly
evaluates its information technology in order for management to identify
investment opportunities for maintaining, modifying, upgrading, or replacing
these systems. There are inherent risks associated with replacing or changing
these systems. Any delays, errors in capturing data, or difficulties in
transitioning to these or other new systems, or in integrating these systems
with the Company’s current systems, or any other disruptions affecting the
Company’s information systems, could have a material adverse impact on the
Company’s business.
Market/Liquidity Risk Related to the
Company’s Investments. In prior years, the Company invested a portion of
its investments in auction-rate securities (“ARS”), including five auction-rate
preferred securities (“ARPS”) that were converted to preferred stock. As of
January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, $22.8 million and $30.9 million,
respectively, of investments were in ARS and preferred securities. ARS have a
long-term stated maturity, but are reset through a “dutch auction” process that
occurs every 7 to 49 days, depending on the terms of the individual security.
Since February 2008, a significant number of auctions related to these
securities failed, meaning that there was not enough demand to sell the entire
issue at auction. The failed auctions have limited the liquidity of the
Company’s investments in ARS, and the Company believes that certain of the
underlying issuers of its ARS are currently at risk. Further auction failures
could have a material impact on Company’s earnings; however, the Company does
not believe further auction failures would have a material impact on its ability
to fund its business.
The
Company reviews impairments in accordance with FASB ASC 320, Investments-Debt and Equity
Securities, to determine the classification of potential impairments as
either “temporary” or “other-than-temporary.” A temporary impairment
results in an unrealized loss being recorded in other comprehensive income. An
impairment that is considered other-than-temporary would be recognized as a loss
in the statements of income. The Company considers various factors in reviewing
impairments, including the length of time and extent to which the fair value has
been less than the Company’s cost basis, the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer, and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the
investments for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated
recovery in market value. The Company believes it has the ability and maintains
its intent to hold its investments until recovery of market value
occurs.
13
The
Company’s investments in ARS and preferred securities are reported at fair
market value, and as of January 30, 2010, the reported investment amount is net
of a $1.3 million temporary impairment and a $2.7 million other-than-temporary
impairment (“OTTI”) to account for the impairment of certain securities from
their stated par value. The Company reported the $1.3 million temporary
impairment, net of tax, as an “accumulated other comprehensive loss” of $0.8
million in stockholders’ equity as of January 30, 2010. The Company has
accounted for the impairment as temporary, as it currently expects to be able to
successfully liquidate its investments without loss once the ARS market resumes
normal operations. The Company reviews all investments for OTTI at least
quarterly or as indicators of impairment exist. Indicators of impairment include
the duration and severity of the decline in market value. In addition, the
Company considers qualitative factors including, but not limited to, the
financial condition of the investee, the credit rating of the investee, and the
current and expected market and industry conditions in which the investee
operates. Given current market conditions in the ARS market, the Company may
incur additional temporary impairment or OTTI in the future if market conditions
persist and the Company is unable to recover the cost of its investments in
ARS.
Interest Rate Risk. To the
extent that the Company borrows under its line of credit facility, the Company
would be exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. As of
January 30, 2010, no borrowings were outstanding under the line of credit
facility. The Company is not a party to any derivative financial instruments.
Additionally, the Company is exposed to market risk related to interest rate
risk on the cash and investments in interest-bearing securities. These
investments have carrying values that are subject to interest rate changes that
could impact earnings to the extent that the Company did not hold the
investments to maturity. If there are changes in interest rates, those changes
would also affect the investment income the Company earns on its cash and
investments. For each one-quarter percent decline in the interest/dividend rate
earned on cash and investments (approximately a 50% change in the rate earned),
the Company’s net income would decrease approximately $0.4 million or less than
$0.01 per share. This amount could vary based upon the number of shares of the
Company’s stock outstanding and the level of cash and investments held by the
Company.
The
company cautions that the risk factors described above could cause actual
results to vary materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking
statements made by or on behalf of the Company. Management cannot assess the
impact of each factor on the Company’s business or the extent to which any
factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to vary from those
contained in forward-looking statements.
ITEM
1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
14
ITEM
2 - PROPERTIES
All of
the store locations operated by the Company are leased facilities. Most of the
Company's stores have lease terms of approximately ten years and generally do
not contain renewal options. In the past, the Company has not experienced
problems renewing its leases, although no assurance can be given that the
Company can renew existing leases on favorable terms. The Company seeks to
negotiate extensions on leases for stores undergoing remodeling to provide terms
of approximately ten years after completion of remodeling. Consent of the
landlord generally is required to remodel or change the name under which the
Company does business. The Company has not experienced problems in obtaining
such consent in the past. Most leases provide for a fixed minimum rental cost
plus an additional rental cost based upon a set percentage of sales beyond a
specified breakpoint, plus common area and other charges. The current terms of
the Company's leases, including automatic renewal options, expiring on or before
January 31st of each
year is as follows:
Year
|
Number of expiring
leases
|
|||
2011
|
71 | |||
2012
|
54 | |||
2013
|
38 | |||
2014
|
41 | |||
2015
|
28 | |||
2016
|
25 | |||
2017
|
27 | |||
2018 and later
|
123 | |||
Total
|
407 |
The
corporate headquarters and distribution center for the Company are located
within a facility purchased by the Company in 1988, which is located in Kearney,
Nebraska. The building currently provides approximately 261,200 square feet of
space, which includes approximately 82,200 square feet related to the Company’s
2005 addition. The Company also owns a 40,000 square foot building with
warehouse and office space near the corporate headquarters. This building houses
the Company’s screenprinting operations. The Company acquired the lease, with
favorable terms, on the land the building is built upon. The lease is currently
in the second of ten five-year renewal options, which expires on October 31,
2011. The Company is also in the process of building a new distribution center
in Kearney, Nebraska. The Company broke ground on a new 240,000 square foot
distribution center in September 2009 and is targeting a completion date of July
2010, at which at which point the new distribution center will replace the
Company’s current distribution center.
ITEM
3 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time
to time, the Company is involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of
its operations in the normal course of business. As of the date of this form,
the Company was not engaged in legal proceedings that are expected, individually
or in the aggregate, to have a material effect on the Company.
ITEM
4 - RESERVED
15
PART
II
ITEM
5 - MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS, AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The
Company’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
BKE. Prior to the Company’s initial public offering on May 6, 1992, there was no
public market for the Company’s common stock.
Dividend
Payments
During
fiscal 2007, cash dividends were $0.1333 per share in the first and second
quarters and $0.1667 per share in the third and fourth quarters. During fiscal
2008, cash dividends were $0.1667 per share in the first and second quarters and
$0.20 per share in the third and fourth quarters. In addition, the Company paid
a special one-time cash dividend of $2.00 per share in the third quarter of
fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2009, cash dividends were $0.20 per share in each of
the four quarters. The Company also paid a special one-time cash dividend of
$1.80 per share in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. Dividend amounts prior to
the Company's 3-for-2 stock split with distribution date of October 30, 2008
have been adjusted to reflect the impact of the stock split. The Company plans
to continue its quarterly dividends during fiscal 2010.
Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
The
following table sets forth information concerning purchases made by the Company
of its common stock for each of the months in the fiscal quarter ended January
30, 2010:
Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
|
Approximate
Number of Shares Yet To
Be Purchased Under
Publicly Announced Plans
|
|||||||||||||
Nov.
1, 2009 to Nov. 28, 2009
|
- | - | - | 799,300 | ||||||||||||
Nov.
29, 2009 to Jan. 2, 2010
|
- | - | - | 799,300 | ||||||||||||
Jan.
3, 2010 to Jan. 30, 2010
|
- | - | - | 799,300 | ||||||||||||
- | - | - |
The
Board of Directors authorized a 1,000,000 share repurchase plan on November 20,
2008. The Company has 799,300 shares remaining to complete this
authorization.
16
Stock Price Performance
Graph
The graph
below compares the cumulative total return on common shares of the Company for
the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total return on the Russell 2000
Stock Index and a peer group of Retail Trade Stocks:
Total
Return Analysis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/29/2005
|
1/28/2006
|
2/3/2007
|
2/2/2008
|
1/31/2009
|
1/30/2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The
Buckle , Inc.
|
100.00 | 125.24 | 192.80 | 244.39 | 205.93 | 320.94 | ||||||||||||||||||
Peer
Group
|
100.00 | 100.07 | 119.19 | 104.04 | 48.98 | 90.65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Russell
2000 Index
|
100.00 | 118.90 | 131.29 | 118.46 | 74.81 | 107.05 |
In
addition to the Company, the Peer Group included in the above performance graph
includes the following retail company stocks: AEO, ANF, ANN, ARO, CBK, GPS, LTD,
PSUN, and WTSLA.
The
following table lists the Company’s quarterly market range for fiscal years
2009, 2008, and 2007, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, and has been
adjusted to reflect the 3-for-2 stock split, effected in the form of a stock
dividend, on October 30, 2008:
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
January 30, 2010
|
January 31, 2009
|
February 2, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter
|
High
|
Low
|
High
|
Low
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||||||||||||||
First
|
$ | 38.30 | $ | 20.54 | $ | 33.67 | $ | 24.72 | $ | 24.91 | $ | 21.63 | ||||||||||||
Second
|
39.09 | 28.75 | 35.98 | 29.03 | 27.63 | 22.71 | ||||||||||||||||||
Third
|
37.49 | 25.52 | 44.57 | 21.08 | 29.14 | 21.46 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fourth
|
33.72 | 26.39 | 27.20 | 13.57 | 28.90 | 20.03 |
The
number of record holders of the Company’s common stock as of March 26, 2010 was
401. Based upon information from the principal market makers, the Company
believes there are approximately 8,100 beneficial owners. The closing price of
the Company’s common stock on March 26, 2010 was $36.89.
Additional
information required by this item appears in the Notes to Financial Statements
under Footnote J "Stock-Based Compensation" on pages 46 to 48 of this report and
is incorporated by reference.
17
ITEM
6 - SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in Thousands Except Share, Per Share Amounts, and Selected Operating Data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||
January 30,
|
January 31,
|
February 2,
|
February 3,
|
January 28,
|
||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007 (d)
|
2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Income
Statement Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 898,287 | $ | 792,046 | $ | 619,888 | $ | 530,074 | $ | 501,101 | ||||||||||
Cost
of sales (including buying, distribution, and occupancy
costs)
|
497,668 | 448,558 | 365,350 | 322,760 | 307,063 | |||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
400,619 | 343,488 | 254,538 | 207,314 | 194,038 | |||||||||||||||
Selling
expenses
|
168,741 | 151,251 | 118,699 | 107,592 | 100,148 | |||||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
32,416 | 30,041 | 26,212 | 20,701 | 17,568 | |||||||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
199,462 | 162,196 | 109,627 | 79,021 | 76,322 | |||||||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
3,674 | 7,829 | 9,183 | 9,032 | 6,123 | |||||||||||||||
Gain
(loss) - impairment of securities
|
991 | (5,157 | ) | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
204,127 | 164,868 | 118,810 | 88,053 | 82,445 | |||||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
76,824 | 60,459 | 43,563 | 32,327 | 30,539 | |||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 127,303 | $ | 104,409 | $ | 75,247 | $ | 55,726 | $ | 51,906 | ||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 2.79 | $ | 2.30 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 1.29 | $ | 1.17 | ||||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 2.73 | $ | 2.24 | $ | 1.63 | $ | 1.24 | $ | 1.13 | ||||||||||
Dividends
declared per share (a)
|
$ | 2.60 | $ | 2.73 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 1.71 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||||
Selected
Operating Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Stores
open at end of period
|
401 | 387 | 368 | 350 | 338 | |||||||||||||||
Average
sales per square foot
|
$ | 428 | $ | 401 | $ | 335 | $ | 302 | $ | 298 | ||||||||||
Average
sales per store (000's)
|
$ | 2,129 | $ | 1,995 | $ | 1,668 | $ | 1,493 | $ | 1,474 | ||||||||||
Comparable
store sales change (b)
|
7.8 | % | 20.6 | % | 13.2 | % | 0.0 | % | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||
Balance Sheet
Data (c)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Working
capital
|
$ | 172,779 | $ | 197,539 | $ | 184,395 | $ | 189,017 | $ | 193,428 | ||||||||||
Long-term
investments
|
$ | 72,770 | $ | 56,213 | $ | 81,201 | $ | 31,958 | $ | 41,654 | ||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 488,903 | $ | 465,340 | $ | 450,657 | $ | 368,198 | $ | 374,266 | ||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
$ | 354,259 | $ | 337,222 | $ | 338,320 | $ | 286,587 | $ | 299,793 |
(a)
During fiscal 2005, cash dividends were $0.0533 per share in the first quarter,
$0.0667 per share in the second quarter, and $0.0756 per share in the third and
fourth quarters. During fiscal 2006, cash dividends were $0.0756 per share in
the first and second quarters, $0.0889 per share in the third quarter, and
$0.1333 per share in the fourth quarter. In addition, the Company paid a special
one-time cash dividend of $1.3333 per share in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2006. During fiscal 2007, cash dividends were $0.1333 per share in the first and
second quarters and $0.1667 per share in the third and fourth quarters. During
fiscal 2008, cash dividends were $0.1667 per share in the first and second
quarters and $0.20 per share in the third and fourth quarters. In addition, the
Company paid a special one-time cash dividend of $2.00 per share in the third
quarter of fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2009, cash dividends were $0.20 per share
in each of the four quarters. The Company also paid a special one-time cash
dividend of $1.80 per share in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. Dividend
amounts prior to the Company's 3-for-2 stock split with distribution date of
January 12, 2007 and 3-for-2 stock split with distribution date of October 30,
2008, have been adjusted to reflect the impact of these stock
splits.
(b)
Stores are deemed to be comparable stores if they were open in the prior year on
the first day of the fiscal period presented. Stores which have been remodeled,
expanded, and/or relocated, but would otherwise be included as comparable
stores, are not excluded from the comparable store sales calculation. Online
sales are excluded from comparable store sales.
(c) At
the end of the period.
(d) Consists
of 53 weeks.
18
ITEM
7 - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and notes thereto of the Company included in this Form 10-K. The following is
management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors which have
affected the Company’s financial condition and results of operations during the
periods included in the accompanying financial statements included in this Form
10-K.
EXECUTIVE
OVERVIEW
Company
management considers the following items to be key performance indicators in
evaluating Company performance.
Comparable Store Sales –
Stores are deemed to be comparable stores if they were open in the prior year on
the first day of the fiscal period being presented. Stores which have been
remodeled, expanded, and/or relocated, but would otherwise be included as
comparable stores, are not excluded from the comparable store sales calculation.
Online sales are excluded from comparable store sales. Management considers
comparable store sales to be an important indicator of current Company
performance, helping leverage certain fixed costs when results are positive.
Negative comparable store sales results could reduce net sales and have a
negative impact on operating leverage, thus reducing net earnings.
Net Merchandise Margins –
Management evaluates the components of merchandise margin including initial
markup and the amount of markdowns during a period. Any inability to obtain
acceptable levels of initial markups or any significant increase in the
Company’s use of markdowns could have an adverse effect on the Company’s gross
margin and results of operations.
Operating Margin – Operating
margin is a good indicator for management of the Company’s success. Operating
margin can be positively or negatively affected by comparable store sales,
merchandise margins, occupancy costs, and the Company’s ability to control
operating costs.
Cash Flow and Liquidity (working
capital) - Management reviews current cash and short-term investments
along with cash flow from operating, investing, and financing activities to
determine the Company’s short-term cash needs for operations and expansion. The
Company believes that existing cash, short-term investments, and cash flow from
operations will be sufficient to fund current and long-term anticipated capital
expenditures and working capital requirements for the next several
years.
19
RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The
following table sets forth certain financial data expressed as a percentage of
net sales and the percentage change in the dollar amount of such items compared
to the prior period:
Percentage of Net Sales
|
Percentage Increase
|
|||||||||||||||||||
For Fiscal Years Ended
|
(Decrease)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
January 30,
2010
|
January 31,
2009
|
February 2,
2008
|
Fiscal Year
2008 to 2009
|
Fiscal Year
2007 to 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 13.4 | % | 27.8 | % | ||||||||||
Cost
of sales (including buying, distribution, and occupancy
costs)
|
55.4 | % | 56.6 | % | 58.9 | % | 10.9 | % | 22.8 | % | ||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
44.6 | % | 43.4 | % | 41.1 | % | 16.6 | % | 34.9 | % | ||||||||||
Selling
expenses
|
18.8 | % | 19.1 | % | 19.1 | % | 11.6 | % | 27.4 | % | ||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
3.6 | % | 3.8 | % | 4.2 | % | 7.9 | % | 14.6 | % | ||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
22.2 | % | 20.5 | % | 17.7 | % | 23.0 | % | 48.0 | % | ||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
0.4 | % | 1.0 | % | 1.5 | % | (53.1 | %) | (14.7 | %) | ||||||||||
Gain
(loss) - impairment of securities
|
0.1 | % | (0.7 | %) | - | (119.2 | %) | - | ||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
22.7 | % | 20.8 | % | 19.2 | % | 23.8 | % | 38.8 | % | ||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
8.5 | % | 7.6 | % | 7.0 | % | 27.1 | % | 38.8 | % | ||||||||||
Net
income
|
14.2 | % | 13.2 | % | 12.1 | % | 21.9 | % | 38.8 | % |
Fiscal
2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
Net sales
for the 52-week fiscal year ended January 30, 2010, increased 13.4 percent to
$898.3 million from net sales of $792.0 million for the 52-week fiscal year
ended January 31, 2009. Comparable store net sales for the fiscal year increased
by $56.9 million, or 7.8%, in comparison to the 52-week year ended January 31,
2009. The comparable store sales increase was primarily due to a 3.9% increase
in the average retail price of merchandise sold during the year, to a 2.0%
increase in the average number of units sold per transaction, and to a 1.3%
increase in the number of transactions at comparable stores during the year.
Sales growth for the fiscal year was also attributable to the inclusion of a
full year of operating results for the 21 new stores opened during fiscal 2008,
to the opening of 20 new stores during fiscal 2009, and to growth in online
sales. Online sales for the year (which are not included in comparable store
sales) increased 45.2% to $52.3 million. Average sales per square foot for
fiscal 2009 increased 6.8% from $401 to $428. Total square footage as of January
30, 2010 was 2.017 million.
The
Company’s average retail price per piece of merchandise sold increased $1.69, or
3.9%, during fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. This $1.69 increase was
primarily attributable to the following changes (with their corresponding effect
on the overall average price per piece): an 8.5% increase in average denim price
points ($1.52), a 9.5% increase in average footwear price points ($0.18), and an
8.5% increase in average active apparel price points ($0.15). These increases
were partially offset by the impact of a shift in the merchandise mix (-$0.10)
and by reduced price points in certain other categories (-$0.06). These changes
are primarily a reflection of merchandise shifts in terms of brands and product
styles, fabrics, details, and finishes.
Gross
profit after buying, distribution, and occupancy costs increased $57.1 million
in fiscal 2009 to $400.6 million, a 16.6% increase. As a percentage of net
sales, gross profit increased from 43.4% in fiscal 2008 to 44.6% in fiscal 2009.
The increase was attributable to a 1.0% improvement, as a percentage of net
sales, in actual merchandise margins; which was achieved through reduced
markdowns and strong sell through of new product during the year that was
partially offset by an increase in Primo Card redemptions. The increase was also
attributable to a 0.10% reduction, as a percentage of net sales, in expense
related to the incentive bonus accrual and a 0.10% reduction related to
leveraged buying, distribution, and occupancy costs. Merchandise shrinkage was
flat at 0.50% of net sales for both fiscal 2009 and fiscal
2008.
20
Selling
expenses increased from $151.3 million in fiscal 2008 to $168.7 million in
fiscal 2009, an 11.6% increase. Selling expenses as a percentage of net sales
decreased from 19.1% in fiscal 2008 to 18.8% in fiscal 2009. The reduction was
primarily attributable to a 0.25% reduction, as a percentage of net sales, in
expense related to the incentive bonus accrual, to a 0.15% reduction in store
payroll expense, and to a 0.10% reduction related to the leveraging of certain
other selling expenses. These reductions were partially offset by an increase in
internet related fulfillment and marketing expenses (0.20%, as a percentage of
net sales).
General
and administrative expenses increased from $30.0 million in fiscal 2008 to $32.4
million in fiscal 2009, a 7.9% increase. As a percentage of net sales, general
and administrative expenses decreased from 3.8% in fiscal 2008 to 3.6% in fiscal
2009. General and administrative expenses for fiscal 2008 are reported net of a
$3.0 million gain from the involuntary conversion of one of the Company’s
corporate aircrafts to a monetary asset upon receipt of $11.5 million in
insurance proceeds. The aircraft was destroyed by a tornado that hit the airport
in Kearney, Nebraska on May 29, 2008. Excluding the $3.0 million gain recognized
during the second quarter of the fiscal year, general and administrative
expenses were 4.2% of net sales in fiscal 2008 compared to 3.6% in fiscal 2009.
The reduction was primarily attributable to a 0.30% reduction, as a percentage
of net sales, in expense related to the incentive bonus accrual and to a 0.30%
reduction related to the leveraging of certain other general and administrative
expenses.
As a
result of the above changes, the Company’s income from operations increased
$37.3 million to $199.5 million for fiscal 2009, a 23.0% increase compared to
fiscal 2008. Income from operations was 22.2% as a percentage of net sales in
fiscal 2009 compared to 20.5% as a percentage of net sales in fiscal 2008.
Excluding the $3.0 million gain on the involuntary disposal of a corporate
aircraft, income from operations in fiscal 2008 was 20.1% as a percentage of net
sales.
Other
income decreased from $7.8 million in fiscal 2008 to $3.7 million in fiscal
2009, a 53.1% decrease. The decrease in other income is due to a reduction in
income earned on the Company’s cash and investments, as a result of lower
interest rates.
Income
tax expense as a percentage of pre-tax income was 36.7% in fiscal 2008 and 37.6%
in fiscal 2009, bringing net income to $127.3 million in fiscal 2009 versus
$104.4 million in fiscal 2008, an increase of 21.9%. The effective income tax
rate increased for fiscal 2009 due to less income generated from tax-exempt
investments.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
Net sales
for the 52-week fiscal year ended January 31, 2009, increased 27.8 percent to
$792.0 million from net sales of $619.9 million for the 52-week fiscal year
ended February 2, 2008. Comparable store net sales for the fiscal year increased
by $119.1 million, or 20.6%, in comparison to the 52-week year ended February 2,
2008. The comparable store sales increase was primarily due to an increase in
the number of transactions at comparable stores during the year, in addition to
a 5.0% increase in the average retail price of merchandise sold during the year
and a 2.5% increase in the average number of units sold per transaction. Sales
growth for the fiscal year was also attributable to the inclusion of a full year
of operating results for the 20 new stores opened during fiscal 2007, to the
opening of 21 new stores during fiscal 2008, and to growth in online sales.
Average sales per square foot for fiscal 2008 increased 19.7% from $335 to $401.
Total square footage as of January 31, 2009 was 1.928 million.
The
Company’s average retail price per piece of merchandise sold increased $2.06, or
5.0%, during fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. This $2.06 increase was
primarily attributable to the following changes (with their corresponding effect
on the overall average price per piece): an 11.3% increase in average knit shirt
price points ($1.35), a 7.1% increase in average denim price points ($1.19), a
12.7% increase in average woven shirt price points ($0.29), a 4.3% increase in
average accessory price points ($0.14), a 12.3% increase in average sweater
price points ($0.12), and increased average price points in certain other
categories ($0.10). These increases were partially offset by the impact of a
shift in the merchandise mix (-$1.13). These changes are primarily a reflection
of merchandise shifts in terms of brands and product styles, fabrics, details,
and finishes.
21
Gross
profit after buying, distribution, and occupancy costs increased $88.9 million
in fiscal 2008 to $343.5 million, a 34.9% increase. As a percentage of net
sales, gross profit increased from 41.1% in fiscal 2007 to 43.4% in fiscal 2008.
The increase was primarily due to a 0.50% improvement, as a percentage of net
sales, in actual merchandise margins, which was achieved through an increase in
regular-price selling during the period that was partially offset by an increase
in Primo Card redemptions and a slight reduction, as a percentage of net sales,
in private label merchandise sales. The increase was also attributable to a
1.90% reduction, as a percentage of net sales, related to leveraged buying,
distribution, and occupancy costs. These improvements were partially offset by
an increase in expense related to the incentive bonus accrual (0.10%, as a
percentage of net sales). Merchandise shrinkage was flat at 0.50% of net sales
for both fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007.
Selling
expenses increased from $118.7 million in fiscal 2007 to $151.3 million in
fiscal 2008, a 27.4% increase. Selling expenses as a percentage of net sales was
19.1% in both fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008. Increases driven primarily by an
increase in expense related to the incentive bonus accrual (0.60%, as a
percentage of net sales), an increase in internet related fulfillment and
marketing expenses (0.15%, as a percentage of net sales), and investments made
during the fourth quarter related to certain store fixtures and supplies (0.20%,
as a percentage of net sales) were offset by a 0.65% reduction, as a percentage
of net sales, in store payroll expense and a 0.30% reduction related the
leveraging of certain other selling expenses.
General
and administrative expenses increased from $26.2 million in fiscal 2007 to $30.0
million in fiscal 2008, a 14.6% increase. As a percentage of net sales, general
and administrative expenses decreased from 4.2% in fiscal 2007 to 3.8% in fiscal
2008. General and administrative expenses for fiscal 2008 are reported net of a
$3.0 million gain from the involuntary conversion of one of the Company’s
corporate aircrafts to a monetary asset upon receipt of $11.5 million in
insurance proceeds. The aircraft was destroyed by a tornado that hit the airport
in Kearney, Nebraska on May 29, 2008. Excluding the $3.0 million gain recognized
during the second quarter of the fiscal year, general and administrative
expenses were 4.2% of net sales in both fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008. An increase
in expense related to the incentive bonus accrual (0.20%, as a percentage of net
sales) was offset by a 0.20% reduction, as a percentage of net sales, related to
the leveraging of certain other general and administrative expenses
As a
result of the above changes, the Company’s income from operations increased
$52.6 million to $162.2 million for fiscal 2008, a 48.0% increase compared to
fiscal 2007. Income from operations was 20.5% as a percentage of net sales in
fiscal 2008 compared to 17.7% as a percentage of net sales in fiscal
2007.
Other
income decreased from $9.2 million in fiscal 2007 to $7.8 million in fiscal
2008, a 14.7% decrease. The decrease in other income is due to a reduction in
income earned on the Company’s cash and investments, as a result of lower
interest rates.
Additionally,
as referenced in Note B to the financial statements, the Company recorded a
total of $5.2 million in unrealized losses during fiscal 2008 resulting from the
other-than-temporary impairment of certain of its investments in auction-rate
securities. The other-than-temporary impairment has been recorded as a separate
component in the statement of income for the fiscal year ended January 31,
2009.
Income
tax expense as a percentage of pre-tax income was 36.7% in both fiscal 2007 and
fiscal 2008, bringing net income to $104.4 million in fiscal 2008 versus $75.2
million in fiscal 2007, an increase of 38.8%.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES
As of
January 30, 2010, the Company had working capital of $172.8 million, including
$135.3 million of cash and cash equivalents and $22.7 million of short-term
investments. The Company’s cash receipts are generated from retail sales and
from investment income, and the Company's primary ongoing cash requirements are
for inventory, payroll, occupancy costs, dividend payments, new store expansion,
remodeling, and other capital expenditures. Historically, the Company’s primary
source of working capital has been cash flow from operations. During fiscal
2009, 2008, and 2007 the Company's cash flow from operations was $158.0 million,
$143.7 million, and $121.1 million, respectively.
22
The
Company has available an unsecured line of credit of $17.5 million with Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. for operating needs and letters of credit. The line of credit
provides that outstanding letters of credit cannot exceed $10.0 million.
Borrowings under the line of credit provide for interest to be paid at a rate
equal to the prime rate established by the Bank. The Company has, from time to
time, borrowed against these lines of credit. There were no borrowings during
fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007. The Company had no bank borrowings as of January
30, 2010 and was in compliance with the terms and conditions of the line of
credit agreement. During fiscal 2009, the Company extended this line of credit
agreement through July 31, 2012.
Dividend payments – During
fiscal 2009, the Company paid total cash dividends of $120.3 million as
follows: $0.20 per share in each of the four quarters and a special
one-time cash dividend of $1.80 per share in the third quarter. During fiscal
2008, cash dividends totaled $126.7 million as follows: $0.1667 per
share in the first and second quarters, $0.20 per share in the third and fourth
quarters, and a special one-time cash dividend of $2.00 per share in the third
quarter. During fiscal 2007, cash dividends totaled $27.0 million as
follows: $0.1333 per share in the first and second quarters and
$0.1667 per share in the third and fourth quarters. Dividend amounts prior to
the Company's 3-for-2 stock split with distribution date of October 30, 2008,
have been adjusted to reflect the impact of this stock split. The Company plans
to continue its quarterly dividends in fiscal 2010.
Stock repurchase plan - During
fiscal 2009, the Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock. The
Company did, however, use cash for repurchasing shares of its common stock
during fiscal 2008 and 2007. The Company purchased 557,100 shares in fiscal 2008
at a cost of $9.4 million and 963,750 shares in fiscal 2007 at a cost of $21.6
million. For fiscal 2007, the number of shares purchased prior to the Company's
3-for-2 stock split in October 2008, have been adjusted to reflect the impact of
this stock split. The Board of Directors authorized a new 1,000,000 share
repurchase plan on November 20, 2008, of which 799,300 shares remained available
for repurchase as of January 30, 2010.
During
fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Company invested $35.1 million, $28.6 million,
and $25.2 million, respectively, in new store construction, store renovation,
and store technology upgrades. The Company spent $15.5 million, $3.6 million,
and $2.3 million in fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, in capital
expenditures for the corporate headquarters and distribution facility. The
Company also spent $15.2 million during fiscal 2008 to purchase a new corporate
aircraft as a replacement for the aircraft that was destroyed by a tornado. The
capital spending for the corporate headquarters and distribution center during
fiscal 2009 included $5.5 million invested in the expansion of the Company’s
online fulfillment infrastructure within its current warehouse and distribution
center in Kearney, Nebraska. The newly expanded online fulfillment center went
live in June 2009 and the expansion approximately doubled the size of the
previous infrastructure. Fiscal 2009 capital spending for the corporate
headquarters also included payments made as work progressed on the Company’s new
distribution center currently under construction in Kearney,
Nebraska.
During
fiscal 2010, the Company anticipates completing approximately 45 store
construction projects, including approximately 20 new stores and approximately
25 stores to be remodeled and/or relocated. As of March 2010, leases for 21 new
stores have been signed and no new leases are under negotiation; however, exact
new store openings, remodels, and relocations may vary from those anticipated.
The average cost of opening a new store during fiscal 2009 was approximately
$0.9 million, including construction costs of approximately $0.7 million and
inventory costs of approximately $0.2 million, net of payables. Management
estimates that total capital expenditures during fiscal 2010 will be
approximately $65 to $70 million, which includes planned new store and store
remodeling projects, the planned replacement of the Company’s current
point-of-sale software and hardware, and the completion of the Company’s new
distribution center. The Company believes that existing cash and cash
equivalents, investments, and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to
fund current and long-term anticipated capital expenditures and working capital
requirements for the next several years. The Company has had a consistent record
of generating positive cash flows each year and, as of January 30, 2010, had
total cash and investments of $230.8 million. The Company does not currently
have plans for any merger or acquisition, and has fairly consistent plans for
new store expansion and remodels. Based upon past results and current plans,
management does not anticipate any large swings in the Company’s need for cash
in the upcoming years.
23
Future
conditions, however, may reduce the availability of funds based upon factors
such as a decrease in demand for the Company’s product, change in product mix,
competitive factors, and general economic conditions as well as other risks and
uncertainties which would reduce the Company’s sales, net profitability, and
cash flows. Also, the Company’s acceleration in store openings and/or remodels,
or entering into a merger, acquisition, or other financial related transaction
could reduce the amount of cash available for further capital expenditures and
working capital requirements.
Auction-Rate Securities - As
of January 30, 2010, total cash and investments included $22.8 million of
auction-rate securities (“ARS”) and $0 of preferred securities, which compares
to $30.3 million of ARS and $0.6 million of preferred securities as of
January 31, 2009. Of the $22.8 million in ARS and preferred securities as of
January 30, 2010, $1.3 million has been included in short-term investments, due
to known or anticipated subsequent redemptions at par value plus accrued
interest, and $21.5 million has been included in long-term investments. ARS have
a long-term stated maturity, but are reset through a “dutch auction” process
that occurs every 7 to 49 days, depending on the terms of the individual
security. During February 2008, a significant number of auctions related to
these securities failed, meaning that there was not enough demand to sell the
entire issue at auction. The failed auctions have limited the current liquidity
of the Company’s investments in ARS and the Company has reason to believe that
certain of the underlying issuers of its ARS are currently at risk. The Company
does not anticipate, however, that further auction failures will have a material
impact on the Company’s ability to fund its business.
ARS and
preferred securities are reported at fair market value, and as of January 30,
2010, the reported investment amount is net of a $1.3 million temporary
impairment and a $2.7 million other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) to
account for the impairment of certain securities from their stated par value.
The Company reported the $1.3 million temporary impairment, net of tax, as an
“accumulated other comprehensive loss” of $0.8 million in stockholders’ equity
as of January 30, 2010. The Company has accounted for the impairment as
temporary, as it currently expects to be able to successfully liquidate its
investments without loss once the ARS market resumes normal operations. During
fiscal 2009, the Company was able to successfully liquidate $5.3 million of its
investments in ARS at par value. The Company also liquidated investments in
preferred securities that were valued at $2.2 million ($5.4 million at par
value) as of January 31, 2009 for $3.9 million, and recorded a gain of $1.7
million in the statement of income for the fiscal year ended January 30,
2010.
The
Company reviews all investments for OTTI at least quarterly or as indicators of
impairment exist and added $0.7 million to OTTI during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2009. The value and liquidity of ARS held by the Company may be affected
by continued auction-rate failures, the credit quality of each security, the
amount and timing of interest payments, the amount and timing of future
principal payments, and the probability of full repayment of the principal.
Additional indicators of impairment include the duration and severity of the
decline in market value. The interest rates on these investments will be
determined by the terms of each individual ARS. The material risks associated
with the ARS held by the Company include those stated above as well as the
current economic environment, downgrading of credit ratings on investments held,
and the volatility of the entities backing each of the issues. In addition, the
Company considers qualitative factors including, but not limited to, the
financial condition of the investee, the credit rating of the investee, and the
current and expected market and industry conditions in which the investee
operates. The Company believes it has the ability and intent to hold these
investments until recovery of market value occurs.
24
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
AND ESTIMATES
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are
based upon The Buckle, Inc.’s financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The preparation of these financial statements requires that management
make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
financial statement date, and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during
the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates its estimates, including
those related to inventory, investments, incentive bonuses, and income taxes.
Management bases its estimates on past experience and on various other factors
that are thought to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Management believes that the estimates and judgments used in preparing these
financial statements were the most appropriate at that time. Presented below are
those critical accounting policies that management believes require subjective
and/or complex judgments that could potentially affect reported results of
operations.
1.
|
Revenue
Recognition. Retail store sales are recorded upon the purchase of
merchandise by customers. Online sales are recorded when merchandise is
delivered to the customer, with the time of delivery being based on
estimated shipping time from the Company’s distribution center to the
customer. Shipping fees charged to customers are included in revenue and
shipping costs are included in selling expenses. The Company accounts for
layaway sales in accordance with FASB ASC 605, Revenue Recognition,
recognizing revenue from sales made under its layaway program upon
delivery of the merchandise to the customer. Revenue is not recorded when
gift cards and gift certificates are sold, but rather when a card or
certificate is redeemed for merchandise. A current liability for
unredeemed gift cards and certificates is recorded at the time the card or
certificate is purchased. The amounts of the gift certificate and gift
card liabilities are determined using the outstanding balances from the
prior three and four years of issuance, respectively. The liability
recorded for unredeemed gift certificates and gift cards was $13.5 million
and $10.1 million as of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009,
respectively. The Company records breakage as other income when the
probability of redemption, which is based on historical redemption
patterns, is remote. Breakage reported for the fiscal years ended January
30, 2010, January 31, 2009, and February 2, 2008 was $0.4 million, $0.4
million, and $0.0 million,
respectively.
|
The
Company establishes a liability for estimated merchandise returns based upon the
historical average sales return percentage. Customer returns could potentially
exceed the historical average, thus reducing future net sales results and
potentially reducing future net earnings. The accrued liability for reserve for
sales returns was $0.6 million and $0.5 million at January 30, 2010 and January
31, 2009, respectively.
2.
|
Inventory.
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined
using an average cost method that approximates the first-in, first-out
(FIFO) method. Management makes adjustments to inventory and cost of goods
sold, based upon estimates, to reserve for merchandise obsolescence and
markdowns that could affect market value, based on assumptions using
calculations applied to current inventory levels within each of four
different markdown levels. Management also reviews the levels of inventory
in each markdown group and the overall aging of the inventory versus the
estimated future demand for such product and the current market
conditions. Such judgments could vary significantly from actual results,
either favorably or unfavorably, due to fluctuations in future economic
conditions, industry trends, consumer demand, and the competitive retail
environment. Such changes in market conditions could negatively impact the
sale of markdown inventory, causing further markdowns or inventory
obsolescence, resulting in increased cost of goods sold from write-offs
and reducing the Company’s net earnings. The liability recorded as a
reserve for markdowns and/or obsolescence was $5.8 million and $6.2
million as of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. The
Company is not aware of any events, conditions, or changes in demand or
price that would indicate that its inventory valuation may not be
materially accurate at this time.
|
25
3.
|
Income
Taxes. The Company records a deferred tax asset and liability for
expected future tax consequences resulting from temporary differences
between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The
Company considers future taxable income and ongoing tax planning in
assessing the value of its deferred tax assets. If the Company determines
that it is more than likely that these assets will not be realized, the
Company would reduce the value of these assets to their expected
realizable value, thereby decreasing net income. Estimating the value of
these assets is based upon the Company’s judgment. If the Company
subsequently determined that the deferred tax assets, which had been
written down, would be realized in the future, such value would be
increased. Adjustment would be made to increase net income in the period
such determination was made.
|
4.
|
Operating
Leases. The Company leases retail stores under operating leases.
Most lease agreements contain tenant improvement allowances, rent
holidays, rent escalation clauses, and/or contingent rent provisions. For
purposes of recognizing lease incentives and minimum rental expenses on a
straight-line basis over the terms of the leases, the Company uses the
date of initial possession to begin amortization, which is generally when
the Company enters the space and begins to make improvements in
preparation of intended use. For tenant improvement allowances and rent
holidays, the Company records a deferred rent liability on the balance
sheets and amortizes the deferred rent over the terms of the leases as
reductions to rent expense on the statements of
income.
|
For
scheduled rent escalation clauses during the lease terms or for rental payments
commencing at a date other than the date of initial occupancy, the Company
records minimum rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the terms of the
leases on the statements of income. Certain leases provide for contingent rents,
which are determined as a percentage of gross sales in excess of specified
levels. The Company records a contingent rent liability on the balance sheets
and the corresponding rent expense when specified levels have been achieved or
are reasonably probable to be achieved.
5.
|
Investments.
As more fully described in Liquidity and Capital Resources on pages 22 to
24 and in Note B to the financial statements on pages 39 to 41, in prior
years the Company invested a portion of its investments in auction-rate
securities (“ARS”) and preferred securities. These investments are
classified as available-for-sale securities and are reported at fair
market values of $22.8 million and $30.9 million as of January 30, 2010
and January 31, 2009, respectively.
|
The
Company reviews impairment in accordance with FASB ASC 320, Investments-Debt and Equity
Securities, to determine the classification of potential impairments as
either temporary or other-than-temporary. A temporary impairment results in an
unrealized loss being recorded in other comprehensive income. An impairment that
is considered other-than-temporary would be recognized in net income. The
Company considers various factors in reviewing impairment, including the
duration and severity of the decline in market value. In addition, the Company
considers qualitative factors including, but not limited to, the financial
condition of the investee, the credit rating of the investee, the current and
expected market and industry conditions in which the investee operates, and the
Company’s intent and ability to hold the investments for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. The Company
believes it has the ability and maintains its intent to hold these investments
until recovery of market value occurs.
The
Company determined the fair value of ARS using Level 1 inputs for known or
anticipated subsequent redemptions at par value, Level 2 inputs using observable
inputs, and Level 3 using unobservable inputs, where the following criteria were
considered in estimating fair value:
|
·
|
Pricing
was provided by the custodian of
ARS;
|
|
·
|
Pricing
was provided by a third-party broker for
ARS;
|
|
·
|
Sales
of similar securities;
|
|
·
|
Quoted
prices for similar securities in active
markets;
|
|
·
|
Quoted
prices for publicly traded preferred
securities;
|
|
·
|
Quoted
prices for similar assets in markets that are not active - including
markets where there are few transactions for the asset, the prices are not
current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time or among
market makers, or in which little information is released
publicly;
|
|
·
|
Pricing
was provided by a third-part valuation consultant (using Level 3
inputs).
|
26
In
addition, the Company considers other factors including, but not limited to, the
financial condition of the investee, the credit rating, insurance, guarantees,
collateral, cash flows, and the current and expected market and industry
conditions in which the investee operates. Management believes it has used
information that was reasonably obtainable in order to complete its valuation
process and determine if the Company’s investments in ARS had incurred any
temporary and/or other-than-temporary impairment as of January 30,
2010.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS, CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, AND COMMERCIAL
COMMITMENTS
As
referenced in the tables below, the Company has contractual obligations and
commercial commitments that may affect the financial condition of the Company.
Based on management’s review of the terms and conditions of its contractual
obligations and commercial commitments, there is no known trend, demand,
commitment, event, or uncertainty that is reasonably likely to occur which would
have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flows.
In
addition, the commercial obligations and commitments made by the Company are
customary transactions, which are similar to those of other comparable retail
companies. The operating lease obligations shown in the table below represent
future cash payments to landlords required to fulfill the Company’s minimum rent
requirements. Such amounts are actual cash requirements by year and are not
reported net of any tenant improvement allowances received from
landlords.
The
following tables identify the material obligations and commitments as of January
30, 2010:
Payments Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
Total
|
Less than 1
year
|
1-3 years
|
4-5 years
|
After 5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Purchase
obligations
|
$ | 20,014 | $ | 20,014 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Deferred
compensation
|
$ | 5,957 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 5,957 | ||||||||||
Operating
leases
|
$ | 303,956 | $ | 49,006 | $ | 83,119 | $ | 67,236 | $ | 104,595 | ||||||||||
Total
contractual obligations
|
$ | 329,927 | $ | 69,020 | $ | 83,119 | $ | 67,236 | $ | 110,552 |
Amount of Commitment Expiration by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Other Commercial Commitments
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
Total
Amounts
Committed
|
Less than
1 year
|
1-3 years
|
4-5 years
|
After 5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
Lines
of credit
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Total
commercial commitments
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
The
Company has available an unsecured line of credit of $17.5 million, of which
$10.0 million is available for letters of credit, which is excluded from the
preceding table. Certain merchandise purchase orders require that the Company
open letters of credit. When the Company takes possession of the merchandise, it
releases payment on the letters of credit. The amounts of outstanding letters of
credit reported reflect the open letters of credit on merchandise ordered, but
not yet received or funded. The Company believes it has sufficient credit
available to open letters of credit for merchandise purchases. There were no
bank borrowings during fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007. The Company had outstanding
letters of credit totaling $0.6 million and $1.1 million at January 30, 2010 and
January 31, 2009, respectively. The Company has no other off-balance sheet
arrangements.
27
SEASONALITY AND
INFLATION
The
Company's business is seasonal, with the holiday season (from approximately
November 15 to December 30) and the back-to-school season (from approximately
July 15 to September 1) historically contributing the greatest volume of net
sales. For fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007, the holiday and back-to-school
seasons accounted for approximately 35%, 37%, and 38%, respectively, of the
Company's fiscal year net sales. Although the operations of the Company are
influenced by general economic conditions, the Company does not believe that
inflation has had a material effect on the results of operations during the past
three fiscal years. Quarterly results may vary significantly depending on a
variety of factors including the timing and amount of sales and costs associated
with the opening of new stores, the timing and level of markdowns, the timing of
store closings, the remodeling of existing stores, competitive factors, and
general economic conditions.
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
Included
in other assets is a note receivable of $1.0 million at both January 30, 2010
and January 31, 2009, from a life insurance trust fund controlled by the
Company’s Chairman. The note was created over three years, beginning in July
1994, when the Company paid life insurance premiums of $0.2 million each year
for the Chairman on a personal policy. The note accrues interest at 5% of the
principal balance per year and is to be paid from the life insurance proceeds.
The note is secured by a life insurance policy on the Chairman.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
Effective
February 3, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. FASB ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The
provisions of FASB ASC 820 apply to all financial instruments that are being
measured and reported on a fair value basis. In addition, FASB ASC 820-10-15-1A
delayed the effective date of FASB ASC 820 to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, for all
non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The
adoption of FASB ASC 820 during fiscal 2008 for all financial instruments and
the adoption during fiscal 2009 for all non-financial assets and liabilities did
not have any impact on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
Effective
February 3, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments. FASB
ASC 825 provides an option for companies to report selected financial assets and
liabilities at fair value. Although the Company adopted the provisions of FASB
ASC 825 effective February 3, 2008, it did not elect the fair value option for
any financial instruments or other items held by the Company. Therefore, the
adoption of FASB ASC 825 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial
position or results of operations.
In May
2009, FASB issued FASB ASC 855, Subsequent Events. This
guidance requires management to evaluate subsequent events through the date the
financial statements are issued, or are available to be issued, and requires
companies to disclose the date through which such subsequent events have been
evaluated. FASB ASC 855 was effective for financial statements issued for
interim or annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. In February
2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-09 which removed the
requirement for SEC filers to disclose the date through which subsequent events
have been evaluated. The adoption of FASB ASC 855 did not have any impact on the
Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In June
2009, FASB issued FASB ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (“ASC”) as the single source of GAAP recognized by FASB to
be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities
laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the
effective date of FASB ASC 105, the codification superseded all then-existing
non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC
accounting literature not included in the codification became non-authoritative.
FASB ASC 105 was effective for financial statements issued for interim or annual
reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. Therefore, the Company
adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 105 on August 2, 2009. The adoption of FASB
ASC 105 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position or results
of operations.
28
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Information
in this report, other than historical information, may be considered to be
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “1995 Act”). Such statements are made in good
faith by the Company pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of the 1995 Act. In
connection with these safe-harbor provisions, this management’s discussion and
analysis contains certain forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s
current views and estimates of future economic conditions, Company performance,
and financial results. The statements are based on many assumptions and factors
that could cause future results to differ materially. Such factors include, but
are not limited to, changes in product mix, changes in fashion trends,
competitive factors, and general economic conditions, economic conditions in the
retail apparel industry, as well as other risks and uncertainties inherent in
the Company’s business and the retail industry in general. Any changes in these
factors could result in significantly different results for the Company. The
Company further cautions that the forward-looking information contained herein
is not exhaustive or exclusive. The Company does not undertake to update any
forward-looking statements, which may be made from time to time by or on behalf
of the Company.
ITEM
7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate
Risk - To the extent that the Company borrows under its line of credit
facility, the Company would be exposed to market risk related to changes in
interest rates. As of January 30, 2010, no borrowings were outstanding under the
line of credit facility. The Company is not a party to any derivative financial
instruments. Additionally, the Company is exposed to market risk related to
interest rate risk on the cash and investments in interest-bearing securities.
These investments have carrying values that are subject to interest rate changes
that could impact earnings to the extent that the Company did not hold the
investments to maturity. If there are changes in interest rates, those changes
would also affect the investment income the Company earns on its cash and
investments. For each one-quarter percent decline in the interest/dividend rate
earned on cash and investments (approximately a 50% change in the rate earned),
the Company’s net income would decrease approximately $0.4 million or less than
$0.01 per share. This amount could vary based upon the number of shares of the
Company’s stock outstanding and the level of cash and investments held by the
Company.
Other Market
Risk – At January 30, 2010, the Company held $26.8 million, at par value,
of investments in auction-rate securities (“ARS”) and preferred stock. The
Company concluded that a $1.3 million temporary impairment and $2.7 million
other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) existed related to these securities as
of January 30, 2010. Given current market conditions in the ARS and capital
markets, the Company may incur additional temporary or other-than-temporary
impairment in the future if market conditions persist and the Company is unable
to recover the cost of its investments in ARS.
29
ITEM
8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The
Buckle, Inc.
Kearney,
Nebraska
We have
audited the accompanying balance sheets of The Buckle, Inc. (the “Company”)
as of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, and the related
statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three
fiscal years in the period ended January 30, 2010. Our audits also included
the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our
audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of The Buckle, Inc. as of January 30, 2010 and
January 31, 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
each of the three fiscal years in the period ended January 30, 2010, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein.
We have
also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of January 30, 2010, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control —
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission and our report, dated March 31, 2010, expressed
an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE
& TOUCHE LLP
Omaha,
Nebraska
March 31,
2010
30
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
BALANCE
SHEETS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
January 30,
|
January 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 135,340 | $ | 162,463 | ||||
Short-term
investments (Notes A, B, and C)
|
22,687 | 19,150 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance of $35 and $46, respectively
|
6,911 | 3,734 | ||||||
Inventory
|
88,187 | 83,963 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets (Note F)
|
11,684 | 17,655 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
264,809 | 286,965 | ||||||
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT (Note D):
|
305,974 | 264,154 | ||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(159,392 | ) | (147,460 | ) | ||||
146,582 | 116,694 | |||||||
LONG-TERM
INVESTMENTS (Notes A, B, and C)
|
72,770 | 56,213 | ||||||
OTHER
ASSETS (Notes F and G)
|
4,742 | 5,468 | ||||||
$ | 488,903 | $ | 465,340 | |||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 24,364 | $ | 22,472 | ||||
Accrued
employee compensation
|
41,463 | 40,460 | ||||||
Accrued
store operating expenses
|
8,866 | 7,701 | ||||||
Gift
certificates redeemable
|
13,507 | 10,144 | ||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
3,830 | 8,649 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
92,030 | 89,426 | ||||||
DEFERRED
COMPENSATION (Note I)
|
5,957 | 4,090 | ||||||
DEFERRED
RENT LIABILITY
|
36,657 | 34,602 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
134,644 | 128,118 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS
(Notes E and H)
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY (Note J):
|
||||||||
Common
stock, authorized 100,000,000 shares of $.01 par value; 46,381,263 and
45,906,265 shares issued and outstanding at January 30, 2010 and January
31, 2009, respectively
|
464 | 459 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
78,837 | 68,894 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
275,751 | 268,789 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(793 | ) | (920 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
354,259 | 337,222 | ||||||
$ | 488,903 | $ | 465,340 |
See notes
to financial statements.
31
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
STATEMENTS
OF INCOME
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
January 30,
|
January 31,
|
February 2,
|
||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
SALES,
Net of returns and allowances of $73,596, $54,973, and $42,087,
respectively
|
$ | 898,287 | $ | 792,046 | $ | 619,888 | ||||||
COST
OF SALES (Including buying, distribution, and occupancy
costs)
|
497,668 | 448,558 | 365,350 | |||||||||
Gross
profit
|
400,619 | 343,488 | 254,538 | |||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
|
||||||||||||
Selling
|
168,741 | 151,251 | 118,699 | |||||||||
General
and administrative
|
32,416 | 30,041 | 26,212 | |||||||||
201,157 | 181,292 | 144,911 | ||||||||||
INCOME
FROM OPERATIONS
|
199,462 | 162,196 | 109,627 | |||||||||
OTHER
INCOME, Net (Note A)
|
3,674 | 7,829 | 9,183 | |||||||||
GAIN
(LOSS) - IMPAIRMENT OF SECURITIES (Note B)
|
991 | (5,157 | ) | - | ||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
204,127 | 164,868 | 118,810 | |||||||||
PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES (Note F)
|
76,824 | 60,459 | 43,563 | |||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$ | 127,303 | $ | 104,409 | $ | 75,247 | ||||||
EARNINGS
PER SHARE (Note K):
|
||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 2.79 | $ | 2.30 | $ | 1.69 | ||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 2.73 | $ | 2.24 | $ | 1.63 |
See notes
to financial statements.
32
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
STATEMENTS
OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of
|
Common
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE,
February 4, 2007
|
29,408,576 | $ | 294 | $ | 43,493 | $ | 242,800 | - | $ | 286,587 | ||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | 75,247 | - | 75,247 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
paid on common stock,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
($.1333
per share - 1st and 2nd quarters)
|
- | - | - | (12,014 | ) | - | (12,014 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
($.1667
per share - 3rd and 4th quarters)
|
- | - | - | (14,988 | ) | - | (14,988 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued on exercise of stock options
|
937,247 | 9 | 12,015 | - | - | 12,024 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of non-vested stock, net of forfeitures
|
138,345 | 1 | (1 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of non-vested stock grants, net of forfeitures
|
- | - | 3,886 | - | - | 3,886 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock
option compensation expense
|
- | - | 293 | - | - | 293 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock purchased and retired
|
(642,500 | ) | (6 | ) | (21,571 | ) | - | - | (21,577 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income
tax benefit related to exercise of stock options
|
- | - | 8,862 | - | - | 8,862 | ||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE,
February 2, 2008
|
29,841,668 | 298 | 46,977 | 291,045 | - | 338,320 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | 104,409 | - | 104,409 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
paid on common stock,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
($.1667
per share – 1st and 2nd quarters)
|
- | - | - | (15,269 | ) | - | (15,269 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
($.20
per share - 3rd and 4th quarters)
|
- | - | - | (18,474 | ) | - | (18,474 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
($2.00
per share - 3rd quarter)
|
- | - | - | (92,922 | ) | - | (92,922 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued on exercise of stock options
|
994,555 | 10 | 12,714 | - | - | 12,724 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of non-vested stock, net of forfeitures
|
139,635 | 1 | (1 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of non-vested stock grants, net of forfeitures
|
- | - | 4,879 | - | - | 4,879 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock
option compensation expense
|
- | - | 289 | - | - | 289 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock purchased and retired
|
(557,100 | ) | (5 | ) | (9,354 | ) | - | - | (9,359 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income
tax benefit related to exercise of stock options
|
- | - | 13,545 | - | - | 13,545 | ||||||||||||||||||
3-for-2
stock split
|
15,487,507 | 155 | (155 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on investments, net of tax
|
- | - | - | - | (920 | ) | (920 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
BALANCE,
January 31, 2009
|
45,906,265 | 459 | 68,894 | 268,789 | (920 | ) | 337,222 | |||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | 127,303 | - | 127,303 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
paid on common stock,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
($.20
per share - 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quarters)
|
- | - | - | (37,011 | ) | - | (37,011 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
($1.80
per share - 3rd quarter)
|
- | - | - | (83,330 | ) | - | (83,330 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued on exercise of stock options
|
278,430 | 3 | 1,823 | - | - | 1,826 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of non-vested stock, net of forfeitures
|
196,568 | 2 | (2 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of non-vested stock grants, net of forfeitures
|
- | - | 4,988 | - | - | 4,988 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock
option compensation expense
|
- | - | 175 | - | - | 175 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income
tax benefit related to exercise of stock options
|
- | - | 2,959 | - | - | 2,959 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on investments, net of tax
|
- | - | - | - | 127 | 127 | ||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE,
January 30, 2010
|
46,381,263 | $ | 464 | $ | 78,837 | $ | 275,751 | $ | (793 | ) | $ | 354,259 |
See notes
to financial statements.
33
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands)
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
January 30,
|
January 31,
|
February 2,
|
||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 127,303 | $ | 104,409 | $ | 75,247 | ||||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
25,135 | 21,779 | 20,384 | |||||||||
Amortization
of non-vested stock grants, net of forfeitures
|
4,988 | 4,879 | 3,886 | |||||||||
Stock
option compensation expense
|
175 | 289 | 293 | |||||||||
Gain
on involuntary conversion of aircraft to monetary asset
|
- | (2,963 | ) | - | ||||||||
(Gain)
loss - impairment of securities
|
(991 | ) | 5,157 | - | ||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
414 | (595 | ) | (1,509 | ) | |||||||
Other
|
38 | 574 | 146 | |||||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(1,967 | ) | (895 | ) | 1,246 | |||||||
Inventory
|
(4,224 | ) | (6,324 | ) | (7,333 | ) | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
6,282 | (2,478 | ) | (1,542 | ) | |||||||
Accounts
payable
|
(2,916 | ) | (844 | ) | 8,903 | |||||||
Accrued
employee compensation
|
1,003 | 12,624 | 10,036 | |||||||||
Accrued
store operating expenses
|
1,165 | 1,997 | 1,236 | |||||||||
Gift
certificates redeemable
|
3,363 | 1,633 | 1,802 | |||||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
(5,731 | ) | 906 | 5,576 | ||||||||
Long-term
liabilities and deferred compensation
|
3,922 | 3,581 | 2,709 | |||||||||
Net
cash flows from operating activities
|
157,959 | 143,729 | 121,080 | |||||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(50,561 | ) | (47,448 | ) | (27,484 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
308 | 11,819 | 21 | |||||||||
Change
in other assets
|
(74 | ) | (29 | ) | 167 | |||||||
Purchases
of investments
|
(52,604 | ) | (46,687 | ) | (153,511 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds
from sales / maturities of investments
|
33,703 | 148,818 | 117,079 | |||||||||
Net
cash flows from investing activities
|
(69,228 | ) | 66,473 | (63,728 | ) | |||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from the exercise of stock options
|
1,826 | 12,724 | 12,024 | |||||||||
Excess
tax benefit from stock option exercises
|
2,661 | 11,268 | 7,744 | |||||||||
Purchases
of common stock
|
- | (9,359 | ) | (21,577 | ) | |||||||
Payment
of dividends
|
(120,341 | ) | (126,665 | ) | (27,002 | ) | ||||||
Net
cash flows from financing activities
|
(115,854 | ) | (112,032 | ) | (28,811 | ) | ||||||
NET
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(27,123 | ) | 98,170 | 28,541 | ||||||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, Beginning of year
|
162,463 | 64,293 | 35,752 | |||||||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, End of year
|
$ | 135,340 | $ | 162,463 | $ | 64,293 |
See notes
to financial statements.
34
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar
Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
A.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Fiscal
Year – The Buckle, Inc. (the “Company”) has its fiscal year end on the
Saturday nearest January 31. All references in these financial statements
to fiscal years are to the calendar year in which the fiscal year begins. Fiscal
2009 represents the 52-week period ended January 30, 2010, fiscal 2008
represents the 52-week period ended January 31, 2009, and fiscal 2007 represents
the 52-week period ended February 2, 2008.
Nature of
Operations – The Company is a retailer of medium to better-priced casual
apparel, footwear, and accessories for fashion conscious young men and women
operating 401 stores located in 41 states throughout the continental United
States as of January 30, 2010.
During
fiscal 2009, the Company opened 20 new stores, substantially renovated 22
stores, and closed 6 stores. During fiscal 2008, the Company opened 21 new
stores, substantially renovated 13 stores, and closed 2 stores. During fiscal
2007, the Company opened 20 new stores, substantially renovated 7 stores, and
closed 2 stores.
Revenue
Recognition – Retail store sales are recorded upon the purchase of
merchandise by customers. Online sales are recorded when merchandise is
delivered to the customer, with the time of delivery being based on estimated
shipping time from the Company’s distribution center to the customer. Shipping
fees charged to customers are included in revenue and shipping costs are
included in selling expenses. Shipping costs were $5,420, $3,813, and $1,882
during fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Merchandise returns are
estimated based upon the historical average sales return percentage and accrued
at the end of the period. The reserve for merchandise returns was $647 and $526
as of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. The Company accounts
for layaway sales in accordance with FASB ASC 605, Revenue Recognition,
recognizing revenue from sales made under its layaway program upon delivery of
the merchandise to the customer. The Company has several sales incentives that
it offers customers including a frequent shopper punch card, B-Rewards gift
certificates, and occasional sweepstakes and gift with purchase offers. The
frequent shopper punch card is recognized as a cost of goods sold at the time of
redemption, using the actual amount tendered. The B-Rewards incentives, based
upon $10 for each $300 in net purchases, are recorded as a liability and as a
selling expense at the time the gift certificates are earned. Sweepstake prizes
are recorded as cost of goods sold (if it is a merchandise giveaway) or as a
selling expense at the time the prize is redeemed by the customer, using actual
costs incurred, and gifts with purchase are recorded as a cost of goods sold at
the time of the purchase and gift redemption, using the actual cost of the
gifted item.
The
Company records the sale of gift cards and gift certificates as a current
liability and recognizes a sale when a customer redeems the gift card or gift
certificate. The amount of the gift certificate liability is determined using
the outstanding balances from the prior three years of issuance and the gift
card liability is determined using the outstanding balances from the prior four
years of issuance. The Company records breakage as other income when the
probability of redemption, which is based on historical redemption patterns, is
remote. Breakage reported for the fiscal years ended January 30, 2010, January
31, 2009, and February 2, 2008 was $434, $389, and $0, respectively. The Company
recognizes a current liability for the down payment made when merchandise is
placed on layaway and recognizes layaways as a sale at the time the customer
makes final payment and picks up the merchandise.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents – The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments
with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash
equivalents.
35
Investments
– The Company accounts for investments in accordance with FASB ASC 320,
Investments-Debt and Equity
Securities. Investments classified as short-term investments include
securities with a maturity of greater than three months and less than one year,
and a portion of the Company’s investments in auction-rate securities (“ARS”),
which are available-for-sale securities. Available-for-sale securities are
reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings
and reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity (net of the effect
of income taxes), using the specific identification method, until they are sold.
The Company reviews impairments in accordance with FASB ASC 320 to determine the
classification of potential impairments as either “temporary” or
“other-than-temporary.” A temporary impairment results in an unrealized loss
being recorded in other comprehensive income. Impairments that are considered
other-than-temporary are recognized as a loss in the statements of income. The
Company considers various factors in reviewing impairments, including the length
of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than the Company’s cost
basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the
Company’s intent and ability to hold the investments for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.
Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost. The Company believes
it has the ability and maintains its intent to hold these investments until
recovery of market value occurs. Trading securities are reported at fair value,
with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings, using the specific
identification method.
Inventory
– Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using
the average cost method. Management records a reserve for merchandise
obsolescence and markdowns based on assumptions using calculations applied to
current inventory levels by department within each of four different markdown
levels. Management also reviews the levels of inventory in each markdown group,
and the overall aging of inventory, versus the estimated future demand for such
product and the current market conditions. The calculation for estimated
markdowns and/or obsolescence reduced the Company’s inventory valuation by
$5,832 and $6,228 as of January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. The
amount charged (credited) to cost of goods sold, resulting from changes in the
markdown reserve balance, was $(396), $439, and $(581), for fiscal years 2009,
2008, and 2007, respectively.
Property and
Equipment – Property and equipment are stated on the basis of historical
cost. Depreciation is provided using a combination of accelerated and
straight-line methods based upon the estimated useful lives of the assets. The
majority of property and equipment have useful lives of five to ten years with
the exception of buildings, which have estimated useful lives of 31.5 to 39
years. Leasehold improvements are stated on the basis of historical cost and are
amortized over the shorter of the life of the lease or the estimated economic
life of the assets. When circumstances indicate the carrying values of
long-lived assets may be impaired, an evaluation is performed on current net
book value amounts. Judgments made by the Company related to the expected useful
lives of property and equipment and the ability to realize cash flows in excess
of carrying amounts of such assets are affected by factors such as changes in
economic conditions and changes in operating performance. As the Company
assesses the expected cash flows and carrying amounts of long-lived assets,
adjustments are made to such carrying values.
Pre-Opening
Expenses – Costs related to opening new stores are expensed as
incurred.
Advertising
Costs – Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and were $8,521,
$7,674, and $6,376 for fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007,
respectively.
Health Care
Costs - The Company is self-funded for health and dental claims up to
$200 per individual per plan year. The Company’s plan covers eligible employees,
and management makes estimates at period end to record a reserve for unpaid
claims based upon historical claims information. The accrued liability as a
reserve for unpaid health care claims was $700 and $600 as of January 30, 2010
and January 31, 2009, respectively.
Operating
Leases – The Company leases retail stores under operating leases. Most
lease agreements contain tenant improvement allowances, rent holidays, rent
escalation clauses, and/or contingent rent provisions. For purposes of
recognizing lease incentives and minimum rental expenses on a straight-line
basis over the terms of the leases, the Company uses the date of initial
possession to begin expensing rent, which is generally when the Company enters
the space and begins to make improvements in preparation of intended
use.
36
For
tenant improvement allowances and rent holidays, the Company records a deferred
rent liability on the balance sheets and amortizes the deferred rent over the
terms of the leases as reductions to rent expense on the statements of
income.
For
scheduled rent escalation clauses during the lease terms or for rental payments
commencing at a date other than the date of initial occupancy, the Company
records minimum rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the terms of the
leases on the statements of income. Certain leases provide for contingent rents,
which are determined as a percentage of gross sales in excess of specified
levels. The Company records a contingent rent liability in “accrued store
operating expenses” on the balance sheets and the corresponding rent expense
when specified levels have been achieved or are reasonably probable to be
achieved.
Other Income
– The Company’s other income is derived primarily from interest and
dividends received on cash and investments, but also includes miscellaneous
other sources of income.
Income Taxes –
The Company records a deferred tax asset and liability for expected
future tax consequences resulting from temporary differences between financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company considers future
taxable income and ongoing tax planning in assessing the value of its deferred
tax assets. If the judgment of the Company’s management determines that it is
more than likely that these assets will not be realized, the Company would
reduce the value of these assets to their expected realizable value, thereby
decreasing net income. If the Company subsequently determined that the deferred
tax assets, which had been written down, would be realized in the future, such
value would be increased, thus increasing net income in the period such
determination was made. The Company records tax benefits only for tax positions
that are more than likely to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities.
The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is
greater than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Unrecognized
tax benefits are tax benefits claimed in the Company’s tax returns that do not
meet these recognition and measurement standards.
Stock
Splits – On September 15, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved
a 3-for-2 stock split payable in the form of a stock dividend for shareholders
of record as of October 15, 2008, with a distribution date of October 30, 2008.
All share and per share data (except par value and historical stockholders’
equity data) presented in the financial statements for all periods has been
adjusted to reflect the impact of this stock split.
Financial
Instruments and Credit Risk Concentrations – Financial instruments, which
potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, are primarily
cash, investments, and accounts receivable. The Company places its investments
primarily in tax-free municipal bonds, auction-rate securities, or U.S. Treasury
securities with short-term maturities and limits the amount of credit exposure
to any one entity.
Of the
Company’s $230,797 in total cash and investments as of January 30, 2010, $22,792
was comprised of investments in auction-rate securities (“ARS”). ARS have a
long-term stated maturity, but are reset through a “dutch auction” process that
occurs every 7 to 49 days, depending on the terms of the individual security.
Until February 2008, the ARS market was highly liquid. During February 2008,
however, a significant number of auctions related to these securities failed,
meaning that there was not enough demand to sell the entire issue at auction.
The failed auctions have limited the current liquidity of certain of the
Company’s investments in ARS and the Company has reason to believe that certain
of the underlying issuers of its ARS are currently at risk. The Company does
not, however, anticipate that further auction failures will have a material
impact on the Company’s ability to fund its business.
Concentrations
of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to the nature
of the Company’s receivables, which include primarily employee receivables that
can be offset against future compensation. The Company’s financial instruments
have a fair value approximating the carrying value.
Earnings Per
Share – Basic earnings per share data are based on the weighted average
outstanding common shares during the period. Diluted earnings per share data are
based on the weighted average outstanding common shares and the effect of all
dilutive potential common shares, including stock options. Basic and diluted
earnings per share for fiscal 2007 have been adjusted to reflect the impact of
the Company’s 3-for-2 stock split paid in the form of a stock dividend on
October 30, 2008.
37
Use of
Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of certain assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from these estimates.
Comprehensive
Income – Comprehensive income consists of net income and unrealized gains
and losses on available-for-sale securities. Unrealized losses on the Company’s
investments in auction-rate securities have been included in accumulated other
comprehensive loss and are separately included as a component of stockholders’
equity, net of related income taxes.
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
January 30,
|
January 31,
|
February 2,
|
||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 127,303 | $ | 104,409 | $ | 75,247 | ||||||
Changes
in net unrealized losses on investments in auction-rate securities, net of
taxes of $(75), $540, and $0, respectively
|
127 | (920 | ) | - | ||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$ | 127,430 | $ | 103,489 | $ | 75,247 |
Recently Issued
Accounting Pronouncements – Effective February 3, 2008, the Company
adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. FASB ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The
provisions of FASB ASC 820 apply to all financial instruments that are being
measured and reported on a fair value basis. In addition, FASB ASC 820-10-15-1A
delayed the effective date of FASB ASC 820 to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, for all
non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The
adoption of FASB ASC 820 during fiscal 2008 for all financial instruments and
the adoption during fiscal 2009 for all non-financial assets and liabilities did
not have any impact on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
Effective
February 3, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments. FASB
ASC 825 provides an option for companies to report selected financial assets and
liabilities at fair value. Although the Company adopted the provisions of FASB
ASC 825 effective with the beginning of the Company’s 2008 fiscal year, it did
not elect the fair value option for any financial instruments or other items
held by the Company. Therefore, the adoption of FASB ASC 825 did not have any
impact on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
In May
2009, FASB issued FASB ASC 855, Subsequent Events. This
guidance requires management to evaluate subsequent events through the date the
financial statements are issued, or are available to be issued, and requires
companies to disclose the date through which such subsequent events have been
evaluated. FASB ASC 855 was effective for financial statements issued for
interim or annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. In February
2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Updated 2010-09 which removed the
requirement for SEC filers to disclose the date through which subsequent events
have been evaluated. The adoption of FASB ASC 855 did not have any impact on the
Company’s financial position or results of operations. The Company has
determined that there were no subsequent events requiring recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements presented herein.
In June
2009, FASB issued FASB ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (“ASC”) as the single source of GAAP recognized by FASB to
be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities
laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the
effective date of FASB ASC 105, the codification superseded all then-existing
non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC
accounting literature not included in the codification became non-authoritative.
FASB ASC 105 was effective for financial statements issued for interim or annual
reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. Therefore, the Company
adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 105 on August 2, 2009. The adoption of FASB
ASC 105 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial position or results
of operations.
38
Supplemental Cash
Flow Information - The Company had non-cash investing activities during
fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007 of $4,808, $1,839, and $1,582, respectively.
The non-cash investing activity relates to unpaid purchases of property, plant,
and equipment included in accounts payable as of the end of the year. Amounts
reported as unpaid purchases are recorded as cash outflows from investing
activities for purchases of property, plant, and equipment in the statement of
cash flows in the period they are paid.
Additional
cash flow information for the Company includes cash paid for income taxes during
fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007 of $79,480, $48,879, and $31,730,
respectively.
B.
|
INVESTMENTS
|
The
following is a summary of investments as of January 30, 2010:
Amortized
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
Other-than-
|
Estimated
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost or
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Temporary
|
Fair
|
||||||||||||||||
Par Value
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Impairment
|
Value
|
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Auction-rate
securities
|
$ | 24,775 | $ | - | $ | (1,258 | ) | $ | (725 | ) | $ | 22,792 | ||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
8,116 | 14 | (14 | ) | - | 8,116 | ||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock
|
2,000 | - | - | (1,974 | ) | 26 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 34,891 | $ | 14 | $ | (1,272 | ) | $ | (2,699 | ) | $ | 30,934 | |||||||||
Held-to-Maturity
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
State
and municipal bonds
|
$ | 47,036 | $ | 535 | $ | (10 | ) | - | $ | 47,561 | ||||||||||
Fixed
maturities
|
8,890 | 92 | - | - | 8,982 | |||||||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
1,640 | 27 | - | - | 1,667 | |||||||||||||||
U.S.
treasuries
|
1,000 | 1 | - | - | 1,001 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 58,566 | $ | 655 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | - | $ | 59,211 | ||||||||||
Trading
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Mutual
funds
|
$ | 6,200 | $ | - | $ | (243 | ) | $ | - | $ | 5,957 |
The
following is a summary of investments as of January 31, 2009:
Amortized
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
Other-than-
|
Estimated
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost or
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Temporary
|
Fair
|
||||||||||||||||
Par Value
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Impairment
|
Value
|
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Auction-rate
securities
|
$ | 35,495 | $ | - | $ | (1,460 | ) | $ | (3,757 | ) | $ | 30,278 | ||||||||
Preferred
stock
|
2,000 | - | - | (1,400 | ) | 600 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 37,495 | $ | - | $ | (1,460 | ) | $ | (5,157 | ) | $ | 30,878 | |||||||||
Held-to-Maturity
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
State
and municipal bonds
|
$ | 31,965 | $ | 536 | $ | (90 | ) | - | $ | 32,411 | ||||||||||
Fixed
maturities
|
2,500 | 37 | (7 | ) | - | 2,530 | ||||||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
2,945 | 42 | - | - | 2,987 | |||||||||||||||
U.S.
treasuries
|
2,985 | 19 | (9 | ) | - | 2,995 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 40,395 | $ | 634 | $ | (106 | ) | $ | - | $ | 40,923 | ||||||||||
Trading
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Mutual
funds
|
$ | 5,165 | $ | - | $ | (1,075 | ) | $ | - | $ | 4,090 |
39
The
auction-rate securities and preferred stock were invested as follows as of
January 30, 2010:
Nature
|
Underlying Collateral
|
Par Value
|
||||
Municipal
revenue bonds
|
92%
insured by AAA/AA/A-rated bond insurers at January 30,
2010
|
$ | 11,700 | |||
Municipal
bond funds
|
Fixed
income instruments within issuers' money market funds
|
9,325 | ||||
Student
loan bonds
|
Student
loans guaranteed by state entities
|
3,750 | ||||
Preferred
stock
|
Underlying
investments of closed-end funds
|
2,000 | ||||
Total
par value
|
$ | 26,775 |
As of
January 30, 2010, the Company’s auction-rate securities portfolio was 57%
AAA/Aaa-rated, 27% AA/Aa-rated, 9% A-rated, and 7% below A-rated.
The
amortized cost and fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity as of
January 30, 2010 is as follows:
Amortized
|
Fair
|
|||||||
Cost
|
Value
|
|||||||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
||||||||
Less
than 1 year
|
$ | 2,950 | $ | 2,950 | ||||
1 -
5 years
|
1,452 | 1,454 | ||||||
5 -
10 years
|
1,206 | 1,209 | ||||||
Greater
than 10 years
|
2,508 | 2,503 | ||||||
$ | 8,116 | $ | 8,116 | |||||
Held-to-maturity
securities
|
||||||||
Less
than 1 year
|
$ | 18,387 | $ | 18,520 | ||||
1 -
5 years
|
35,802 | 36,234 | ||||||
5 -
10 years
|
1,926 | 1,978 | ||||||
Greater
than 10 years
|
2,451 | 2,479 | ||||||
$ | 58,566 | $ | 59,211 |
At
January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, $26,634 and $29,328 of available-for-sale
securities and $40,179 and $22,795 of held-to-maturity investments are
classified in long-term investments. Trading securities are held in a Rabbi
Trust, intended to fund the Company’s deferred compensation plan, and are
classified in long-term investments.
The
Company’s investments in auction-rate securities (“ARS”) are classified as
available-for-sale and reported at fair market value. As of January 30, 2010,
the reported investment amount is net of $1,258 of temporary impairment and
$2,699 of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) to account for the impairment
of certain securities from their stated par value. The $1,258 temporary
impairment is reported, net of tax, as an “accumulated other comprehensive loss”
of $793 in stockholders’ equity as of January 30, 2010. For the investments
considered temporarily impaired, the Company believes that these ARS can be
successfully redeemed or liquidated through future auctions at par value plus
accrued interest. The Company believes it has the ability and maintains its
intent to hold these investments until such recovery of market value occurs;
therefore, the Company believes the current lack of liquidity has created the
temporary impairment in valuation.
40
As of
January 30, 2010, the Company had $24,775 invested in ARS and $2,000 invested in
preferred securities, at par value, which are reported at their estimated fair
value of $22,792 and $26, respectively. As of January 31, 2009, the Company had
$35,495 invested in ARS and $2,000 invested in preferred securities, which were
reported at their estimated fair value of $30,278 and $600, respectively. ARS
have a long-term stated maturity, but are reset through a “dutch auction”
process that occurs every 7 to 49 days, depending on the terms of the individual
security. Until February 2008, the ARS market was highly liquid. During February
2008, however, a significant number of auctions related to these securities
failed, meaning that there was not enough demand to sell the entire issue at
auction. The failed auctions have limited the current liquidity of certain of
the Company’s investments in ARS and the Company has reason to believe that
certain of the underlying issuers of its ARS are currently at risk. The Company
does not, however, anticipate that further auction failures will have a material
impact on the Company’s ability to fund its business. During fiscal 2009, the
Company was able to successfully liquidate $5,320 of its investments in ARS at
par value. The Company also liquidated investments in preferred securities that
were valued at $2,217 ($5,400 at par value) as of January 31, 2009 for $3,933,
and recorded a gain of $1,716 in the statement of income for the fiscal year
ended January 30, 2010. The Company reviews all investments for OTTI at least
quarterly or as indicators of impairment exist and added $725 to OTTI during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Indicators of impairment include the duration and
severity of decline in market value. In addition, the Company considers
qualitative factors including, but not limited to, the financial condition of
the investee, the credit rating of the investee, and the current and expected
market and industry conditions in which the investee operates.
As of
January 30, 2010, $1,350 of the Company’s investment in ARS and preferred
securities was classified in short-term investments, due to known or anticipated
subsequent redemptions, and $21,468 was classified in long-term investments. As
of January 31, 2009, $1,550 of the Company’s investment in ARS and preferred
securities was classified in short-term investments and $29,328 was classified
in long-term investments.
C.
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASURMENTS
|
As
defined by FASB ASC 820, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures, fair value is the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial
assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value are classified and
disclosed in one of the following categories:
|
·
|
Level
1 – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Short-term and long-term investments with active markets or
known redemption values are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1
inputs.
|
|
·
|
Level
2 – Observable market-based inputs (either directly or indirectly) such as
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets
that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or inputs that
are corroborated by market data.
|
|
·
|
Level
3 – Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data and are
projections, estimates, or interpretations that are supported by little or
no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets.
The Company has concluded that certain of its ARS represent Level 3
valuation and should be valued using a discounted cash flow analysis. The
assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include
estimates for interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows, and
expected holding periods of the
ARS.
|
As of
January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, the Company held certain assets that are
required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis including
available-for-sale and trading securities. The Company’s available-for-sale
securities include its investments in ARS, as further described in Note B. The
failed auctions, beginning in February 2008, related to certain of the Company’s
investments in ARS have limited the availability of quoted market prices. The
Company has determined the fair value of its ARS using Level 1 inputs for known
or anticipated subsequent redemptions at par value, Level 2 inputs using
observable inputs, and Level 3 using unobservable inputs where the following
criteria were considered in estimating fair value:
41
|
·
|
Pricing
was provided by the custodian of
ARS;
|
|
·
|
Pricing
was provided by a third-party broker for
ARS;
|
|
·
|
Sales
of similar securities;
|
|
·
|
Quoted
prices for similar securities in active
markets;
|
|
·
|
Quoted
prices for publicly traded preferred
securities;
|
|
·
|
Quoted
prices for similar assets in markets that are not active - including
markets where there are few transactions for the asset, the prices are not
current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time or among
market makers, or in which little information is released
publicly;
|
|
·
|
Pricing
was provided by a third-part valuation consultant (using Level 3
inputs).
|
In
addition, the Company considers other factors including, but not limited to, the
financial condition of the investee, the credit rating, insurance, guarantees,
collateral, cash flows, and the current and expected market and industry
conditions in which the investee operates. Management believes it has used
information that was reasonably obtainable in order to complete its valuation
process and determine if the Company’s investments in ARS had incurred any
temporary and/or other-than-temporary impairment as of January 30, 2010 and
January 31, 2009.
Future
fluctuations in fair value of ARS that the Company judges to be temporary,
including any recoveries of previous write-downs, would be recorded as an
adjustment to “accumulated other comprehensive loss.” The value and
liquidity of ARS held by the Company may be affected by continued auction-rate
failures, the credit quality of each security, the amount and timing of interest
payments, the amount and timing of future principal payments, and the
probability of full repayment of the principal. Additional indicators of
impairment include the duration and severity of the decline in market value. The
interest rates on these investments will be determined by the terms of each
individual ARS. The material risks associated with the ARS held by the Company
include those stated above as well as the current economic environment,
downgrading of credit ratings on investments held, and the volatility of the
entities backing each of the issues.
The
Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject
to the disclosure requirements of FASB ASC 820 were as follows:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in
|
||||||||||||||||
Active Markets
|
Significant
|
Significant
|
||||||||||||||
for Identical
|
Observable
|
Unobservable
|
||||||||||||||
Assets
|
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
||||||||||||||
January 30, 2010
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
||||||||||||||||
Auction-rate
securities
|
$ | 1,261 | $ | 12,894 | $ | 8,637 | $ | 22,792 | ||||||||
Municipal
bonds
|
8,116 | - | - | 8,116 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
stock
|
26 | - | - | 26 | ||||||||||||
Trading
securities (including mutual funds)
|
5,957 | - | - | 5,957 | ||||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 15,360 | $ | 12,894 | $ | 8,637 | $ | 36,891 |
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in
|
||||||||||||||||
Active Markets
|
Significant
|
Significant
|
||||||||||||||
for Identical
|
Observable
|
Unobservable
|
||||||||||||||
Assets
|
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
||||||||||||||
January 31, 2009
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
||||||||||||||||
Auction-rate
securities
|
$ | 1,550 | $ | 21,468 | $ | 7,260 | $ | 30,278 | ||||||||
Preferred
stock
|
600 | - | - | 600 | ||||||||||||
Trading
securities (including mutual funds)
|
4,090 | - | - | 4,090 | ||||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 6,240 | $ | 21,468 | $ | 7,260 | $ | 34,968 |
42
ARS,
municipal bonds, and preferred securities included in Level 1 represent
securities which have a known or anticipated upcoming redemption as of January
30, 2010 and those that have publicly traded quoted prices. ARS included in
Level 2 represent securities which have not experienced a successful auction
subsequent to February 2, 2008. The fair market value for these securities was
determined by applying a discount to par value based on auction prices for
similar securities and by utilizing a discounted cash flow model, using
market-based inputs, to determine fair value. The Company used a discounted cash
flow model to value its Level 3 investments, using estimates regarding recovery
periods, yield, and liquidity. The assumptions used are subjective based upon
management’s judgment and views on current market conditions, and resulted in
$739 of the Company’s recorded temporary impairment and $725 of the OTTI as of
January 30, 2010. The use of different assumptions would result in a different
valuation and related temporary impairment charge.
Changes
in the fair value of the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), as defined in
FASB ASC 820, are as follows:
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||
January 30,
|
January 31,
|
|||||||
Available-for-Sale Auction-Rate Securities
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Balance,
beginning of year
|
$ | 7,260 | - | |||||
Total
gains or losses (realized and unrealized):
|
||||||||
Included
in net income
|
(725 | ) | - | |||||
Included
in other comprehensive income
|
(48 | ) | (690 | ) | ||||
Purchases,
sales, issuances, and settlements (net)
|
(25 | ) | - | |||||
Transfers
in and/or out of Level 3
|
2,175 | 7,950 | ||||||
Balance,
end of year
|
$ | 8,637 | $ | 7,260 |
D.
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
January 30,
|
January 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Land
|
$ | 1,959 | $ | 1,170 | ||||
Building
and improvements
|
14,678 | 13,447 | ||||||
Office
equipment
|
6,105 | 6,043 | ||||||
Transportation
equipment
|
19,005 | 18,997 | ||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
119,941 | 111,544 | ||||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
110,579 | 96,778 | ||||||
Shipping/receiving
equipment
|
15,783 | 10,294 | ||||||
Screenprinting
equipment
|
111 | 111 | ||||||
Construction-in-progress
|
17,813 | 5,770 | ||||||
$ | 305,974 | $ | 264,154 |
E.
|
FINANCING
ARRANGEMENTS
|
The
Company has available an unsecured line of credit of $17,500 of which $10,000 is
available for letters of credit. During fiscal 2009, this line of credit was
extended through July 31, 2012. Borrowings under the line of credit and letter
of credit provide for interest to be paid at a rate equal to the prime rate as
set by the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. index on the date of the borrowings. There
were no bank borrowings at January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009. There were no
bank borrowings during fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007. The Company had outstanding
letters of credit totaling $618 and $1,059 at January 30, 2010 and January 31,
2009, respectively.
43
F.
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
The
provision for income taxes consists of:
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
January 30,
|
January 31,
|
February 2,
|
||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
Current
income tax expense (benefit):
|
||||||||||||
Federal
|
$ | 66,059 | $ | 52,905 | $ | 38,224 | ||||||
State
|
10,351 | 8,149 | 6,849 | |||||||||
Deferred
income tax expense (benefit):
|
414 | (595 | ) | (1,509 | ) | |||||||
Total
|
$ | 76,824 | $ | 60,459 | $ | 43,564 |
Total
income tax expense for the year varies from the amount which would be provided
by applying the statutory income tax rate to earnings before income taxes. The
primary reasons for this difference (expressed as a percent of pre-tax income)
are as follows:
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
January 30,
|
January 31,
|
February 2,
|
||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
Statutory
rate
|
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||
State
income tax effect
|
3.4 | 3.6 | 4.0 | |||||||||
Tax
exempt interest income
|
(0.3 | ) | (1.0 | ) | (2.0 | ) | ||||||
Other
|
(0.5 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||||
Effective
tax rate
|
37.6 | % | 36.7 | % | 36.7 | % |
Deferred
income tax assets and liabilities are comprised of the following:
January 30,
|
January 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Deferred
income tax assets (liabilities):
|
||||||||
Inventory
|
$ | 3,641 | $ | 3,681 | ||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
3,337 | 3,112 | ||||||
Accrued
compensation
|
3,373 | 2,547 | ||||||
Accrued
store operating costs
|
390 | 262 | ||||||
Unrealized
loss on securities
|
2,021 | 2,847 | ||||||
Gift
certificates redeemable
|
550 | 495 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
13 | 17 | ||||||
Deferred
rent liability
|
13,563 | 12,803 | ||||||
Property
and equipment
|
(15,841 | ) | (14,228 | ) | ||||
Net
deferred income tax asset
|
$ | 11,047 | $ | 11,536 |
At
January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively, the net current deferred
income tax assets of $7,396 and $7,085 are classified in “prepaid expenses and
other assets.” The net non-current deferred income tax assets of
$3,651 and $4,451 are classified in “other assets” at January 30, 2010 and
January 31, 2009, respectively. There are no unrecognized tax benefits to be
recorded in the Company’s financial statements at January 30, 2010 or January
31, 2009. The Company has no open examinations with the Internal Revenue Service
and fiscal years 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 remain subject to examination by the
Internal Revenue Service as well as state taxing
authorities.
44
G.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
Included
in other assets is a note receivable of $1,035 at January 30, 2010 and $1,005 at
January 31, 2009, respectively, from a life insurance trust fund controlled by
the Company’s Chairman. The note was created over three years, beginning in July
1994, when the Company paid life insurance premiums of $200 each year for the
Chairman on a personal policy. The note accrues interest at 5% of the principal
balance per year and is to be paid from the life insurance proceeds. The note is
secured by a life insurance policy on the Chairman.
|
H.
|
COMMITMENTS
|
Leases -
The Company conducts its operations in leased facilities under numerous
non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through fiscal 2021.
Most of the Company’s stores have lease terms of approximately ten years and
generally do not contain renewal options. Most lease agreements contain tenant
improvement allowances, rent holidays, rent escalation clauses, and/or
contingent rent provisions. For purposes of recognizing lease incentives and
minimum rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases,
the Company uses the date of initial possession to begin amortization, which is
generally when the Company enters the space and begins to make improvements in
preparation of intended use. For tenant improvement allowances and rent
holidays, the Company records a deferred rent liability on the balance sheets
and amortizes the deferred rent over the terms of the leases as reductions to
rent expense on the statements of income. For scheduled rent escalation clauses
during the lease terms or for rental payments commencing at a date other than
the date of initial occupancy, the Company records minimum rental expenses on a
straight-line basis over the terms of the leases on the statements of income.
Certain leases provide for contingent rents, which are determined as a
percentage of gross sales in excess of specified levels. The Company records a
contingent rent liability on the balance sheets and the corresponding rent
expense when specified levels have been achieved or are reasonably probable to
be achieved. Operating lease base rental expense for fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007
was $45,805, $41,687, and $38,298, respectively. Most of the rental payments are
based on a minimum annual rental plus a percentage of sales in excess of a
specified amount. Percentage rents for fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007 were $4,153,
$3,202, and $1,159, respectively.
Total
future minimum rental commitments under these operating leases with remaining
lease terms in excess of one year as of January 30, 2010 are as
follows:
Minimum Rental
|
||||
Fiscal Year
|
Commitments
|
|||
2010
|
$ | 49,006 | ||
2011
|
43,806 | |||
2012
|
39,313 | |||
2013
|
35,644 | |||
2014
|
31,592 | |||
Thereafter
|
104,595 | |||
Total
minimum rental commitments
|
$ | 303,956 |
Litigation
- From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation relating to claims
arising out of its operations in the normal course of business. As of the date
of these financial statements, the Company was not engaged in any legal
proceedings that are expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a
material effect on the Company.
45
I. EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS
The
Company has a 401(k) profit sharing plan covering all eligible employees who
elect to participate. Contributions to the plan are based upon the amount of the
employees’ deferrals and the employer’s discretionary matching formula. The
Company may contribute to the plan at its discretion. The total expense under
the profit sharing plan was $1,130, $1,022, and $887 for fiscal years 2009,
2008, and 2007, respectively.
The
Buckle, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan covers the Company’s executive officers.
The plan is funded by participant contributions and a specified annual Company
matching contribution not to exceed 6% of the participant’s compensation. The
Company’s contributions were $428, $341, and $390 for fiscal years 2009, 2008,
and 2007, respectively.
J.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
The
Company has several stock option plans which allow for granting of stock options
to employees, executives, and directors. The options are in the form of
non-qualified stock options and are granted with an exercise price equal to the
market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The options
generally expire ten years from the date of grant. The Company also has a
restricted stock plan that allows for the granting of non-vested shares of
common stock to employees and executives and a restricted stock plan that allows
for the granting of non-vested shares of common stock to non-employee
directors.
As of
January 30, 2010, 641,748 shares were available for grant under the various
stock option plans, of which 452,111 were available for grant to executive
officers. Also as of January 30, 2010, 208,372 shares were available for grant
under the various restricted stock plans, of which 129,248 were available for
grant to executive officers.
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718,
Compensation-Stock
Compensation. Compensation expense was recognized fiscal 2009, 2008, and
2007 for new awards, based on the grant date fair value, as well as for the
portion of awards granted in fiscal years prior to FASB ASC 718 adoption that
was not vested as of the beginning of fiscal 2006. The fair value of stock
options is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, while the
fair value of grants of non-vested common stock awards is the stock price on the
date of grant.
Information
regarding the impact of stock-based compensation expense is as
follows:
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
January 30,
|
January 31,
|
February 2,
|
||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense, before tax:
|
||||||||||||
Stock
options
|
$ | 175 | $ | 289 | $ | 293 | ||||||
Non-vested
shares of common stock
|
4,988 | 4,879 | 3,886 | |||||||||
Total
stock-based compensation expense, before tax
|
$ | 5,163 | $ | 5,168 | $ | 4,179 | ||||||
Total
stock-based compensation expense, after tax
|
$ | 3,253 | $ | 3,256 | $ | 2,633 |
FASB ASC
718 requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost
recognized for stock options exercised during the period to be classified as
financing cash inflows. This amount is shown as “excess tax benefit from stock
option exercises” on the statements of cash flows. For fiscal 2009, 2008, and
2007, the excess tax benefit realized from exercised stock options was $2,661,
$11,268, and $7,744, respectively.
No stock
options were granted during fiscal 2009. Stock options granted during fiscal
2008 and 2007 were granted under the Company’s 1993 Director Stock Option Plan.
Grants were made with an exercise price equal to the market value of the
Company’s common stock on the date of grant and a contractual term of ten years.
Options granted under the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan typically vest over a
period of three years.
46
The
weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the fiscal year
was $8.41 and $8.54 per option for fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. The fair
value of options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||
January 31,
|
February 2,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Risk-free
interest rate (1)
|
3.10 | % | 4.80 | % | ||||
Dividend
yield (2)
|
2.40 | % | 2.40 | % | ||||
Expected
volatility (3)
|
33.00 | % | 39.00 | % | ||||
Expected
lives - years (4)
|
7.0 | 7.0 |
(1)
|
Based
on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant with a
term consistent with the expected lives of stock
options.
|
(2)
|
Based
on expected dividend yield as of the date of
grant.
|
(3)
|
Based
on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over a period
consistent with the expected lives of stock
options.
|
(4)
|
Based
on historical and expected exercise
behavior.
|
On
September 15, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized a $3.00 per share ($2.00
per share after 3-for-2 stock split) special one-time cash dividend to be paid
on October 27, 2008 to shareholders of record at the close of business on
October 15, 2008. Additionally, on September 21, 2009, the Board of Directors
authorized a $1.80 per share special one-time cash dividend to be paid on
October 27, 2009 to shareholders of record at the close of business on October
15, 2009. To preserve the intrinsic value for option holders, the Board also
approved on each occasion, pursuant to the terms of the Company’s various stock
option plans, a proportional adjustment to both the exercise price and the
number of shares covered by each award for all outstanding stock options. This
adjustment did not result in any incremental compensation expense.
A summary
of the Company’s stock-based compensation activity related to stock options for
the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 is as follows:
Weighted
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||
Average
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
||||||||||||||
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Price
|
Life
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
- beginning of year
|
1,635,163 | $ | 6.91 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
- | - | ||||||||||||||
Other
(1)
|
447 | 5.83 | ||||||||||||||
Expired/forfeited
|
(5,069 | ) | 24.21 | |||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(278,430 | ) | 6.56 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding
- end of year
|
1,352,111 | $ | 5.02 | 3.29 |
years
|
$ | 34,237 | |||||||||
Exercisable
- end of year
|
1,331,816 | $ | 4.75 | 3.22 |
years
|
$ | 34,076 |
(1)
|
An
adjustment was made to the exercise price and number of options
outstanding for the special cash dividend paid during October 2009.
“Other” represents additional options issued as a result of this
adjustment in the third quarter of fiscal
2009.
|
47
The total
intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007,
respectively, was $7,477, $35,447, and $23,135. As of January 30, 2010, there
was $64 of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock
options. It is expected that this expense will be recognized over a weighted
average period of approximately 1.0 year.
Non-vested
shares of common stock granted during fiscal 2007 and 2008 were granted pursuant
to the Company’s 2005 Restricted Stock Plan. Non-vested shares granted during
fiscal 2009 were granted pursuant to the Company’s 2005 Restricted Stock Plan
and the Company’s 2008 Director Restricted Stock Plan. Shares granted under the
2005 Plan typically vest over a period of four years, only upon certification by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors that the Company has
achieved its pre-established performance targets for the fiscal year. Shares
granted under the 2008 Director Plan vest 25% on the date of grant and then in
equal portions on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of
grant.
A summary
of the Company’s stock-based compensation activity related to grants of
non-vested shares of common stock for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 is
as follows:
Weighted Average
|
||||||||
Grant Date
|
||||||||
Shares
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||
Non-Vested
- beginning of year
|
423,171 | $ | 23.84 | |||||
Granted
|
243,800 | 21.20 | ||||||
Forfeited
|
(47,232 | ) | 22.66 | |||||
Vested
|
(214,394 | ) | 22.14 | |||||
Non-Vested
- end of year
|
405,345 | $ | 23.29 |
As of
January 30, 2010, there was $4,066 of unrecognized compensation expense related
to grants of non-vested shares. It is expected that this expense will be
recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.9 years. The total
fair value of shares vested during fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $6,517,
$5,128, and $4,398, respectively.
K.
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
The
following table provides reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per
share:
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
January 30, 2010
|
January 31, 2009
|
February 2, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Per
|
Weighted
|
Per
|
Weighted
|
Per
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Share
|
Average
|
Share
|
Average
|
Share
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Income
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Income
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 127,303 | 45,699 | $ | 2.79 | $ | 104,409 | 45,367 | $ | 2.30 | $ | 75,247 | 44,551 | $ | 1.69 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effect
of Dilutive Securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
options and
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
non-vested
shares
|
- | 993 | (0.06 | ) | - | 1,207 | (0.06 | ) | - | 1,703 | (0.06 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
$ | 127,303 | 46,692 | $ | 2.73 | $ | 104,409 | 46,574 | $ | 2.24 | $ | 75,247 | 46,254 | $ | 1.63 |
Stock
options to purchase 72,637 shares of common stock were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share for fiscal 2008 because the options
would be considered anti-dilutive. No stock options were deemed anti-dilutive
and excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for either
fiscal 2009 or 2007.
48
L. SEGMENT
INFORMATION
The
Company is a retailer of medium to better-priced casual apparel, footwear, and
accessories. The Company operated 401 stores located in 41 states throughout the
continental United States as of January 30, 2010. The Company operates its
business as one segment.
The
following is information regarding the Company’s major product lines and is
stated as a percentage of the Company’s net sales:
Fiscal Years Ended
|
||||||||||||
January 30,
|
January 31,
|
February 2,
|
||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||
Denims
|
42.9 | % | 41.4 | % | 43.2 | % | ||||||
Tops
(including sweaters)
|
36.7 | 39.0 | 36.1 | |||||||||
Accessories
|
7.7 | 7.7 | 7.7 | |||||||||
Sportswear/fashions
|
5.0 | 4.6 | 4.3 | |||||||||
Footwear
|
4.7 | 4.6 | 5.6 | |||||||||
Outerwear
|
2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |||||||||
Casual
bottoms
|
0.4 | 0.6 | 1.0 | |||||||||
Other
|
0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
M.
|
SELECTED
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(UNAUDITED)
|
Selected
unaudited quarterly financial information for fiscal 2009 and 2008 are as
follows:
Quarter
|
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal
2009
|
First
|
Second
|
Third
|
Fourth
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 199,697 | $ | 192,906 | $ | 231,238 | $ | 274,446 | ||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ | 86,703 | $ | 82,278 | $ | 102,117 | $ | 129,521 | ||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 26,862 | $ | 24,994 | $ | 33,305 | $ | 42,142 | ||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.59 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.92 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.58 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.90 |
Quarter
|
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal
2008
|
First
|
Second
|
Third
|
Fourth
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 160,300 | $ | 169,765 | $ | 210,567 | $ | 251,414 | ||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ | 65,622 | $ | 70,268 | $ | 91,805 | $ | 115,793 | ||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 18,717 | $ | 22,276 | $ | 29,076 | $ | 34,340 | ||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.41 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.62 | $ | 0.74 |
Basic and
diluted shares outstanding are computed independently for each of the quarters
presented and, therefore, may not sum to the totals for the
year.
49
ITEM
9 - CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM
9A - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The
Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are
designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information, which is
required to be timely disclosed, is accumulated and communicated to management
in a timely manner. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) was
performed as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation
was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation,
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the Company’s reports that it files
or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management,
including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and are
effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by the
SEC’s rules and forms.
Change in
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – There were no changes in the
Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Company's last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonable
likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Management of the
Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over
financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United State of America (“GAAP”).
All
internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent
limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can
provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement
preparation and presentation. Because of its inherent limitations, internal
control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements.
Management
has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of January 30, 2010, based on the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission in
their Internal
Control–Integrated Framework. In making its assessment of internal
control over financial reporting, management has concluded that the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 30,
2010.
The
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche
LLP, has audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting. Their report appears herein.
50
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The
Buckle, Inc.
Kearney,
Nebraska
We have
audited the internal control over financial reporting of The Buckle, Inc.
(the “Company”) as of January 30, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal Control —
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based
on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or
under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal
financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the
company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of
the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because
of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting,
including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of
controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
In our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2010, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.
We have
also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the financial statements and financial
statement schedule as of and for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010, of
the Company and our report dated March 31, 2010 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those financial statements and financial statement
schedule.
/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE
& TOUCHE LLP
Omaha,
Nebraska
March 31,
2010
51
ITEM
9B – OTHER INFORMATION
As
required by Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange’s Corporate Governance
Standards, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer submitted a certification to
the New York Stock Exchange in fiscal 2009 that he was not aware of any
violation by the Company of the New York Stock Exchange’s Corporate Governance
Standards as of the date of the certification, June 29, 2009.
PART
III
ITEM
10 – DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The
information required by this item appears under the captions "Executive Officers
of the Company" appearing on pages 10 and 11 of this report and "Election of
Directors" in the Company's Proxy Statement for its 2010 Annual Shareholders'
Meeting and is incorporated by reference.
ITEM
11- EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information
required by this item appears under the following captions in the Company's
Proxy Statement for its 2010 Annual Shareholders' Meeting and is incorporated by
reference: “Executive Compensation,” “Director Compensation” (included under the
“Election of Directors” section), and “Report of the Audit
Committee.”
ITEM
12 - SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The
information required by this item appears under the captions "Beneficial
Ownership of Common Stock" and “Election of Directors” in the Company's Proxy
Statement for its 2010 Annual Shareholders' Meeting and in the Notes to
Financial Statements under Footnote J on pages 46 to 48 of this report and is
incorporated by reference.
ITEM
13 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The
information required by this item appears under the captions “Independence” and
“Related Party Transactions” (included under the “Election of Directors”
section) in the Company's Proxy for its 2010 Annual Shareholders' Meeting and is
incorporated by reference.
ITEM
14 – PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information
regarding the fees billed by our independent registered public accounting firm
and the nature of services comprising the fees for each of the two most recent
fiscal years is set forth under the caption “Ratification of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2010
Annual Shareholders' Meeting and is incorporated by reference.
PART
IV
ITEM
15 – EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
(a)
Financial Statement Schedule
Valuation
and Qualifying Account. This schedule is on page 54.
All other
schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required
information is presented in the financial statements or notes
thereto.
(b) Exhibits
See index
to exhibits on pages 55 and 56.
52
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
THE
BUCKLE, INC.
|
||
Date: March
31, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ DENNIS H. NELSON
|
Dennis
H. Nelson,
|
||
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
Date: March
31, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ KAREN B. RHOADS
|
Karen
B. Rhoads,
|
||
Vice
President of Finance, Treasurer,
|
||
and
Principal Accounting Officer
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities indicated on the 31st day of
March, 2010.
/s/ DANIEL J. HIRSCHFELD
|
/s/ BILL L .FAIRFIELD
|
|
Daniel
J. Hirschfeld
|
Bill
L. Fairfield
|
|
Chairman
of the Board and Director
|
Director
|
|
/s/ DENNIS H. NELSON
|
||
Dennis
H. Nelson
|
Bruce
L. Hoberman
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
Director
|
|
and
Director
|
||
/s/ KAREN B. RHOADS
|
||
Karen
B. Rhoads
|
Michael
Huss
|
|
Vice
President of Finance and
|
Director
|
|
Principal
Accounting Officer and Director
|
||
/s/ JOHN P. PEETZ
|
/s/ JAMES E. SHADA
|
|
John
P. Peetz, III
|
James
E. Shada
|
|
Director
|
Director
|
|
Robert
E. Campbell
|
||
Director
|
53
SCHEDULE
II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
Allowance for
|
||||
Doubtful Accounts
|
||||
Balance
February 4, 2007
|
$ | 72,000 | ||
Amounts
charged to costs and expenses
|
328,377 | |||
Write-off
of uncollectible accounts
|
(338,377 | ) | ||
Balance,
February 2, 2008
|
62,000 | |||
Amounts
charged to costs and expenses
|
275,558 | |||
Write-off
of uncollectible accounts
|
(291,558 | ) | ||
Balance,
January 31, 2009
|
46,000 | |||
Amounts
charged to costs and expenses
|
358,065 | |||
Write-off
of uncollectible accounts
|
(369,065 | ) | ||
Balance,
January 30, 2010
|
$ | 35,000 |
54
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
Exhibits
|
Page
Number or Incorporation
|
||||
by
Reference to
|
|||||
(3)
|
Articles
of Incorporation and By-Laws.
|
||||
(3.1)
Articles of Incorporation
|
Exhibit
3.1 to Form S-1
|
||||
of
The Buckle, Inc. as amended
|
No.
33-46294
|
||||
(3.1.1)
Amendment to the Articles of
|
|||||
Incorporation
of The Buckle, Inc.
|
|||||
(3.2)
By-Laws of The Buckle, Inc.
|
Exhibit
3.2 to Form S-1
|
||||
No.
33-46294
|
|||||
(4)
|
Instruments
defining the rights of security
|
||||
holders,
including indentures
|
|||||
(4.1)
See Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 for provisions
|
|||||
of
the Articles of Incorporation and
|
|||||
By-laws
of the Registrant defining rights
|
|||||
of
holders of Common Stock of the registrant
|
|||||
(4.2)
Form of stock certificate for Common Stock
|
Exhibit
4.1 to Form S-1
|
||||
No.
33-46294
|
|||||
(9)
|
Not
applicable
|
||||
(10)
|
Material
Contracts
|
||||
(10.1) Acknowledgment for Dennis H. Nelson
|
|||||
dated
March 22, 2010 (*)
|
|||||
(10.2) Acknowledgment for Karen B. Rhoads
|
|||||
dated
March 22, 2010
(*)
|
|||||
(10.3) Acknowledgment for Brett P. Milkie
|
|||||
dated
March 22, 2010 (*)
|
|||||
(10.4) Acknowledgment for Patricia K. Whisler
|
|||||
dated
March 22, 2010 (*)
|
|||||
(10.5) Acknowledgment for Kari G. Smith
|
|||||
dated
March 22, 2010 (*)
|
|||||
(10.6) Cash or Deferred Profit Sharing Plan
|
Exhibit
10.10 to Form S-1
|
||||
|
No.
33-46294
|
||||
(10.6.1)
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|||||
(10.7)
Revolving Line of Credit Note and Second
Amendment
to Credit Agreement, dated
July 31, 2009 between The Buckle, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for a $17.5 million line of credit |
Exhibit
10.7 to Form 10-K
filed for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 |
||||
(10.8) 1993 Director Stock Option Plan
|
Exhibit
B to Proxy Statement
|
||||
Amended
and Restated (*)
|
for
Annual Meeting held
|
||||
|
June
2, 2006
|
||||
(10.9) 1997 Executive Stock Option Plan (*)
|
Exhibit
B to Proxy Statement
|
||||
|
for
Annual Meeting held
|
||||
|
May
28, 1998
|
||||
(10.10)
1998 Restricted Stock Plan (*)
|
Exhibit
C to Proxy Statement
|
||||
|
for
Annual Meeting held
|
||||
|
May
28,
1998
|
55
(10.11)
2005 Restricted Stock Plan (*)
|
Exhibit
B to Proxy Statement
|
||||
for
Annual Meeting held
|
|||||
June
2, 2005
|
|||||
(10.12)
2008 Management Incentive Plan (*)
|
Exhibit
A to Proxy Statement
|
||||
for
Annual Meeting held
|
|||||
May
28, 2008
|
|||||
(10.13)
2008 Director Restricted Stock Plan (*)
|
Exhibit
B to Proxy Statement
|
||||
|
For
Annual Meeting held
|
||||
May
28, 2008
|
|||||
(10.14)
2009 Management Incentive Plan (*)
|
Exhibit
A to Proxy Statement
|
||||
for
Annual Meeting held
|
|||||
May
29, 2009
|
|||||
(11)
|
Not
applicable
|
||||
(12)
|
Not
applicable
|
||||
(13)
|
Not
applicable
|
||||
(14)
|
Not
applicable
|
||||
(16)
|
Not
applicable
|
||||
(18)
|
Not
applicable
|
||||
(19)
|
Not
applicable
|
||||
(21)
|
Not
applicable
|
||||
(22)
|
Not
applicable
|
||||
(23)
|
Consent
of Deloitte & Touche LLP
|
||||
(25)
|
Not
applicable
|
||||
(28)
|
Not
applicable
|
||||
(31a)
|
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
|
||||
Under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted
|
|||||
Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|||||
(31b)
|
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
|
||||
Under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted
|
|||||
Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|||||
(32)
|
Certifications
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
|
||||
Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
|
|||||
Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
(*)
Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement.
56