Burlington Stores, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2017 October (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended October 28, 2017

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     .

Commission File Number 001-36107

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (609) 387-7800

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    ☐   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

The registrant had 68,247,877 shares of common stock outstanding as of October 28, 2017.

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

INDEX

2

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

(All amounts in thousands, except per share data)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(All amounts in thousands)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(All amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(All amounts in thousands)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

October 28, 2017

(Unaudited)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

As of October 28, 2017, Burlington Stores, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company), through its indirect subsidiary Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (BCFWC), has expanded its store base to 631 retail stores, inclusive of an internet store, of which 12 remained closed as of October 28, 2017, primarily as a result of weather-related incidents as discussed below.

These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Burlington Stores, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited, but in the opinion of management reflect all adjustments (which are of a normal and recurring nature) necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods presented. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted. These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017 (Fiscal 2016 10-K). The balance sheet at January 28, 2017 presented herein has been derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Fiscal 2016 10-K. Because the Company’s business is seasonal in nature, the operating results for the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of results for the fiscal year.

Accounting policies followed by the Company are described in Note 1 to the Fiscal 2016 10-K, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Fiscal Year

The Company defines its fiscal year as the 52 or 53 week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31. The current fiscal year ends February 3, 2018 (Fiscal 2017) and is a 53-week fiscal year. The fiscal year ended January 28, 2017 (Fiscal 2016) was 52-week fiscal year.

Adopted Accounting Standards

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (ASU 2016-09). ASU 2016-09 changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees including: (i) requiring all income tax effects of awards to be recognized in the income statement, rather than in additional paid in capital, when the awards vest or are settled, (ii) eliminating the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies can recognize them, (iii) requiring companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity, (iv) increasing the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation, (v) requiring an employer to classify the cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on its statement of cash flows and (vi) requiring an employer to elect whether to account for forfeitures of share-based payments by (a) recognizing forfeitures of awards as they occur or (b) estimating the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjusting the estimate when it is likely to change, as is currently required. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted this standard effective January 29, 2017.

The primary impact of adoption was the prospective recognition of excess tax benefits in the income statement as an income tax benefit rather than equity, which increased net income per share during the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017 by $0.04 and $0.20, respectively, by lowering the Company’s effective tax rate approximately 430 basis points and 730 basis points, respectively.

7

The Company has applied the amendment relating to the presentation of the excess tax benefits on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows retrospectively, resulting in the reclassification of $11.7 million of excess tax benefits from cash flows from financing activities to cash flows from operating activities for the nine month period ended October 29, 2016.

The Company has elected to account for forfeitures of share-based awards as they occur, on a modified retrospective basis, resulting in a $0.4 million cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 29, 2017.

The presentation requirements for cash flows related to employee taxes paid upon the vesting of restricted stock awards had no impact to any of the periods presented in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows since such cash flows have historically been presented as a financing activity.

Pending Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which converges revenue recognition under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The new guidance supersedes most preexisting revenue recognition guidance, and provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for public companies to periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The standard shall be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of the fiscal year ending February 2, 2019 (Fiscal 2018). The Company is in the process of determining the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. The Company believes that there will be no change in the timing or amount of revenue recognized under the new standard as it relates to revenue from point of sale at the registers in our stores, which constitutes more than 99% of the Company’s revenue. The new standard will require a change in the presentation of the Company’s sales return reserve on the balance sheet, which is currently recorded net. The new standard will require the reserve to be established at the gross sales value with an asset established for the value of the merchandise returned. The Company does not, however, anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” The standard’s core principle is to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of the fiscal year ending February 1, 2020 (Fiscal 2019). Early adoption is permitted. While the Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements or notes thereto, it does expect that this new guidance will result in a significant increase to the assets and liabilities presented on its consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 13 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Fiscal 2016 10-K (entitled “Lease Commitments”) for further detail of the Company’s future minimum lease payments. This guidance is not expected, however, to have a material impact on the Company's liquidity.

On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” The primary purpose of this ASU is to reduce the diversity in practice that has resulted from the lack of consistent principles on this topic. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of Fiscal 2018. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. The Company does not anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

On November 17, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash.” The primary purpose of this ASU is to reduce the diversity in practice that exists in the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. This ASU will require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of Fiscal 2018. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. While the Company is still in the process of determining the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements or notes thereto, it does not anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

On January 26, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which aims to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the new guidance, goodwill impairment will be measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The new guidance will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods. This ASU will be effective for

8

the Company as of the beginning of Fiscal 2020. Early adoption is permitted for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

There were no other new accounting standards that had a material impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements during the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017, and there were no other new accounting standards or pronouncements that were issued but not yet effective as of October 28, 2017 that the Company expects to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations upon becoming effective.

Weather-Related Incidents

As a result of the effects of certain weather-related incidents during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, 80 of the Company’s stores were closed for at least one day during the quarter.  The Company incurred losses of (i) $5.9 million related to the net book values of merchandise inventories, and (ii) $9.7 million related to the net book values of property and equipment and other long-lived assets, as well as repair and maintenance costs related to the clean-up of its stores. These costs are recorded in the line items “Cost of sales” and “Selling general and administrative expenses” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, respectively, for the three and nine months ended October 28, 2017. As of October 31, 2017, the Company received approximately $11.7 million of insurance proceeds to offset some of its losses.  The Company allocated $3.1 million of these proceeds to property and equipment, which is included in the line item “Proceeds from insurance recoveries related to property and equipment,” a component of cash flows from investing activities, on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows during the nine months ended October 28, 2017.  The Company is insured at the selling price of the inventory and at replacement costs for the property and equipment and other long-lived assets, less a deductible. The Company has recorded a $2.8 million receivable related to these losses as of October 28, 2017, as the collection is deemed probable based on the insurance contracts the Company had in place at the time of the losses, which is included in the line item “Accounts receivable” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

2. Long Term Debt

Long term debt consists of:

Term Loan Facility

At October 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, the Company’s borrowing rate related to its senior secured term loan facility (the Term Loan Facility) was 4.0% and 3.5%, respectively.

On November 17, 2017, BCFWC entered into Amendment No. 6 (the Sixth Amendment) to the Term Loan Credit Agreement (as amended, the Amended Term Loan Credit Agreement) governing its senior secured term loan facility (the Term Loan Facility). The Sixth Amendment, among other things, reduced the interest rate margins applicable to the Term Loan Facility from 1.75% to 1.50% in the case of prime rate loans, and from 2.75% to 2.50% in the case of LIBOR loans, with the LIBOR floor continuing to be 0.75%. The Sixth Amendment also extended the maturity date from August 13, 2021 to November 17, 2024. The Sixth Amendment was accomplished by replacing the outstanding $1,117.0 million principal amount of Term B-4 Loans with a like aggregate principal amount of Term B-5 Loans. The Company is required to make quarterly payments of $2.8 million on the Term B-5 Loans, due on the last fiscal day of each quarter, with the balance due upon maturity. As a result of this transaction, the Company will incur approximately a $3 million charge to loss on extinguishment of debt and approximately a $1 million charge to costs related to debt amendments in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2017.  

9

ABL Line of Credit

At October 28, 2017, the Company had $380.6 million available under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 2, 2011, governing BCFWC’s existing senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the ABL Line of Credit). The maximum borrowings under the facility during the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017 amounted to $235.5 million for both periods. Average borrowings during the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017 amounted to $147.4 million and $86.1 million, respectively, at average interest rates of 2.7% for both periods.

At October 29, 2016, the Company had $383.7 million available under the ABL Line of Credit. The maximum borrowings under the facility during the three and nine month periods ended October 29, 2016 amounted to $300.0 million and $350.0 million, respectively. Average borrowings during the three and nine month periods ended October 29, 2016 amounted to $201.4 million and $216.8 million, respectively, at average interest rates of 1.8% for both periods.

3. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company accounts for derivatives and hedging activities in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (Topic No. 815). As required by Topic No. 815, the Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value and adjusts to market on a quarterly basis. In addition, to comply with the provisions of ASC Topic No. 820, “Fair Value Measurements” (Topic No. 820), credit valuation adjustments, which consider the impact of any credit enhancements to the contracts, are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered any applicable credit enhancements such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees. In accordance with Topic No. 820, the Company made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of its derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio. There is no impact of netting because the Company’s only derivatives are interest rate cap contracts that are with separate counterparties and are under separate master netting agreements.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company primarily uses interest rate caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract.

The Company did not record any hedge ineffectiveness in its earnings during the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017 or October 29, 2016. The Company financed the cost of the interest rate cap contracts, which will be amortized through the life of the caps. During the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017, the Company paid $0.8 million and $3.4 million, respectively, exclusive of $0.3 million and $1.4 million of taxes, respectively, related to the financing of these interest rate cap contracts.  During the three and nine month periods ended October 29, 2016, the Company paid $0.9 million and $3.5 million, respectively, exclusive of $0.4 million and $1.4 million of taxes, respectively, related to the financing of these interest rate cap contracts. These costs are included in the line item “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company estimates that approximately $5.4 million will be reclassified into interest expense during the next twelve months.

As of October 28, 2017, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:

10

Tabular Disclosure

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on a gross basis as well as their classification on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:

The following table presents the unrealized losses deferred to accumulated other comprehensive loss resulting from the Company’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedging instruments for each of the reporting periods.

The following table presents information about the reclassification of losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings related to the Company’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedging instruments for each of the reporting periods.

4. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss are recorded net of the related income tax effects. The following table details the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss:

11

5. Fair Value Measurements

The Company accounts for fair value measurements in accordance with Topic No. 820, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measurement and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Topic No. 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price), and classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Refer to Note 3, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” for further discussion regarding the fair value of the Company’s interest rate cap contracts.

Financial Assets

The fair values of the Company’s financial assets and the hierarchy of the level of inputs as of October 28, 2017, January 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016 are summarized below: 

Non-financial Assets

Long-lived assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for purposes of calculating impairment using the fair value hierarchy of Topic No. 820. The fair value of the Company’s long-lived assets is generally calculated using discounted cash flows. During the nine month period ended October 28, 2017, the Company recorded impairment charges of $1.0 million, primarily related to declines in revenues and operating results for one leased store, which was fully impaired, and a decline in the appraised fair value of one of the Company’s owned stores, which was partially impaired.  These costs were recorded in the line item “Impairment charges – long-lived assets” in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The fully impaired store had zero fair value as of October 28, 2017, and would be categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy described above. The table below sets forth the aggregate impairment charges and the remaining fair value, by level within the fair value hierarchy, of the partially-impaired store as of October 28, 2017:

12

Financial Liabilities

The fair values of the Company’s financial liabilities are summarized below:

The fair values presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of the respective period end dates. The estimated fair values of the Company’s debt are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

6. Income Taxes

Net deferred taxes are as follows:

Deferred tax assets relate to Puerto Rico deferred tax balances that have a net future benefit for tax purposes.  Deferred tax liabilities primarily relate to intangible assets and depreciation expense where the Company has a future obligation for tax purposes.

As of October 28, 2017, January 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, valuation allowances amounted to $6.8 million, $7.4 million and $7.8 million, respectively, related to state tax net operating losses and state tax credit carry forwards. The Company believes that it is more likely than not that a portion of the benefit of these state tax net operating losses and state tax credit carry forwards will not be realized. As of October 28, 2017, the Company had $6.1 million of deferred tax assets recorded for state net operating losses, which will expire between 2017 and 2037. In addition, there was no valuation allowance required against the tax benefit associated with Puerto Rico deferred tax assets as of October 28, 2017 and January 28, 2017 compared to a full valuation allowance of $5.5 million as of October 29, 2016.

7. Capital Stock

Treasury Stock

The Company accounts for treasury stock under the cost method.

During the nine month period ended October 28, 2017, the Company acquired 44,660 shares of common stock from employees for approximately $4.2 million to satisfy their minimum statutory tax withholdings related to the vesting of restricted stock awards.

Share Repurchase Programs

On November 15, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of the Company’s common stock, which the Company completed during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017. On August 16, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to an additional $300 million of the Company’s common stock. This new repurchase program

13

is authorized to be executed through August 2019, and is funded using the Company’s available cash and borrowings on the ABL Line of Credit.

During the nine month period ended October 28, 2017, the Company repurchased 2,549,192 shares of its common stock for $230.7 million, inclusive of commissions, under these share repurchase programs. The amount repurchased during the nine month period ended October 28, 2017 was recorded in the line item “Treasury stock” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of October 28, 2017, the Company had $269.0 million remaining under its share repurchase authorization.

The Company is authorized to repurchase, from time to time, shares of its outstanding common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions under its repurchase programs. The timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on a variety of factors, including the market conditions as well as corporate and regulatory considerations. The share repurchase programs may be suspended, modified or discontinued at any time and the Company has no obligation to repurchase any amount of the Company’s common stock under the programs.

8. Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Dilutive net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:

Approximately 325,000 shares and 170,000 shares were excluded from diluted net income per share for the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017, respectively, since their effect was anti-dilutive.

Less than 100,000 shares and approximately 105,000 shares were excluded from diluted net income per share for the three and nine month periods ended October 29, 2016, respectively, since their effect was anti-dilutive.

9. Stock-Based Compensation

As of October 28, 2017, there were 4,972,757 shares of common stock available for issuance under the Company’s 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the 2013 Plan). On May 17, 2017, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment and restatement of the 2013 Plan (the Amended Plan).  Among other changes, the Amended Plan includes a new method of reducing the plan’s share reserve, commonly referred to as “fungible share” counting.  Under this method, restricted stock units, performance awards or other stock-based awards (collectively, Full Value Awards), reduce the share reserve at a ratio of 2 shares for every share subject to the full value award. Prior to the amendment, Full Value Awards reduced the share reserve on a 1-for-1 basis. Stock options and stock appreciation rights continue to reduce the share reserve on a 1-for-1 basis under the Amended Plan. A description of the terms and

14

conditions of the Amended Plan is set forth in the Company’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2017.

Non-cash stock compensation expense is as follows:

Stock Options

Stock option transactions during the nine month period ended October 28, 2017 are summarized as follows:

The following table summarizes information about the stock options vested and expected to vest during the contractual term as of October 28, 2017:

15

The fair value of each stock option granted during the nine month period ended October 28, 2017 was estimated using the Black Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:

The expected dividend yield was based on the Company’s expectation of not paying dividends in the foreseeable future. Since the Company completed its initial public offering in October 2013, it does not have sufficient history as a publicly traded company to evaluate its volatility factor. As such, the expected stock price volatility is based upon the historical volatility of the stock price over the expected life of the options of peer companies that are publicly traded. The risk free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury rates for U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with maturities similar to those of the expected term of the awards being valued. For grants issued during the nine month period ended October 28, 2017, the expected life of the options was calculated using the simplified method. The simplified method defines the life as the average of the contractual term of the options and the weighted average vesting period for all option tranches. This methodology was utilized due to the short length of time the Company’s common stock has been publicly traded.

Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock transactions during the nine month period ended October 28, 2017 are summarized as follows:

The fair value of each share of restricted stock granted during Fiscal 2017 was based upon (a) the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date prior to the grant date for grants made before May 17, 2017 (the date on which the Company’s stockholders approved the Amended Plan) and (b) the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date for grants made from and after May 17, 2017.

10. Other Liabilities

Other liabilities primarily consist of deferred lease incentives, the long term portion of self-insurance reserves, the excess of straight-line rent expense over actual rental payments and tax liabilities associated with the uncertain tax positions recognized by the Company in accordance with ASC Topic No. 740, “Income Taxes.”

Deferred lease incentives are funds received or receivable from landlords used primarily to offset costs incurred for leasehold improvements and fixturing of new and remodeled stores. These deferred lease incentives are amortized over the expected lease term including rent holiday periods and option periods, where the exercise of the option can be reasonably assured. Amortization of deferred lease incentives is included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. At October 28, 2017, January 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, deferred lease incentives were $200.0 million, $180.9 million and $181.3 million, respectively, and are recorded in the line item “Other liabilities” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

16

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal

The Company establishes accruals relating to legal claims in connection with litigation to which the Company is party from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Like many retailers, the Company has been named in class or collective actions on behalf of various groups alleging violations of federal and state wage and hour and other labor statutes, and alleged violation of state consumer and/or privacy protection statutes. In the normal course of business, we are also party to various other lawsuits and regulatory proceedings including, among others, commercial, product, product safety, employee, customer, intellectual property and other claims. Actions against us are in various procedural stages. Many of these proceedings raise factual and legal issues and are subject to uncertainties. To determine the likelihood of a loss and/or the measurement of any loss can be complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss in excess of amounts accrued. The Company’s assessments are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on estimates and assumptions that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change those estimates and assumptions. While no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of these matters, the Company believes that the final resolution of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, liquidity or capital resources.

Lease Agreements

The Company enters into lease agreements during the ordinary course of business in order to secure favorable store locations. The Company’s minimum lease payments for all operating leases are expected to be $83.3 million for the remainder of Fiscal 2017 and $358.9 million, $349.7 million, $327.6 million, $303.5 million and $1,533.6 million for the fiscal years ended February 2, 2019, February 1, 2020, January 30, 2021, January 29, 2022 and all subsequent years thereafter, respectively. Total future minimum lease payments include $293.7 million related to options to extend lease terms that are reasonably assured of being exercised and $443.0 million of minimum lease payments for 54 stores that the Company has committed to open or relocate.

Letters of Credit

The Company had letter of credit arrangements with various banks in the aggregate amount of $54.2 million, $53.1 million and $42.0 million as of October 28, 2017, January 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, respectively. Among these arrangements, as of October 28, 2017, January 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, the Company had letters of credit in the amount of $43.6 million, $44.2 million and $31.9 million, respectively, guaranteeing performance under various insurance contracts and utility agreements. In addition, the Company had outstanding letters of credit agreements in the amounts of $10.6 million, $8.9 million and $10.1 million at October 28, 2017, January 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, respectively, related to certain merchandising agreements. Based on the terms of the agreement governing the ABL Line of Credit, the Company had the ability to enter into letters of credit up to $380.6 million, $427.8 million and $383.7 million as of October 28, 2017, January 28, 2017 and October 29, 2016, respectively.

Purchase Commitments

The Company had $804.4 million of purchase commitments related to goods that were not received as of October 28, 2017.

Death Benefits

In November 2005, the Company entered into agreements with three of the Company’s former executives whereby upon each of their deaths the Company will pay $1.0 million to each respective designated beneficiary.

12. Related Parties

The brother-in-law of one of the Company’s Executive Vice Presidents is an independent sales representative of one of the Company’s suppliers of merchandise inventory. This relationship predated the commencement of the Executive Vice President’s employment with the Company. The Company has determined that the dollar amount of purchases through such supplier represents an insignificant amount of its inventory purchases.

17

BURLINGTON STORES, INC.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting our consolidated operating results, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows as of and for the periods presented below. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K related to the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017.

In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, such as our plans, objectives, expectations, and intentions. Our actual results and the timing of events may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to various factors, including those discussed under the section of this Item 2 entitled “Safe Harbor Statement.”

Executive Summary

Introduction and Overview of Operating Results

We are a nationally recognized off-price retailer of high-quality, branded apparel at everyday low prices. We opened our first store in Burlington, New Jersey in 1972, selling primarily coats and outerwear. Since then, we have expanded our store base to 631 stores as of October 28, 2017, inclusive of an internet store, in 45 states and Puerto Rico, and diversified our product categories by offering an extensive selection of in-season, fashion-focused merchandise, including women’s ready-to-wear apparel, menswear, youth apparel, baby, footwear, accessories, home and coats. We acquire a broad selection of desirable, first-quality, current-brand, labeled merchandise directly from nationally-recognized manufacturers and other suppliers.

Weather-Related Incidents

As a result of the effects of certain weather-related incidents during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, 80 of our stores were closed for at least one day during the quarter.  We incurred losses of (i) $5.9 million related to the net book values of merchandise inventories and (ii) $9.7 million related to the net book values of property and equipment and other long-lived assets, as well as repair and maintenance costs related to the clean-up of its stores. These costs are recorded in the line items “Cost of sales” and “Selling general and administrative expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, respectively, for the three and nine months ended October 28, 2017.  As of October 31, 2017, we received approximately $11.7 million of insurance proceeds to offset some of its losses.  We allocated $3.1 million of these proceeds to property and equipment, which is included in the line item “Proceeds from insurance recoveries related to property and equipment,” a component of cash flows from investing activities, on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows during the nine months ended October 28, 2017.  We are insured at the selling price of the inventory and at replacement costs for the property and equipment and other long-lived assets, less a deductible. We have recorded a $2.8 million receivable related to these losses as of October 28, 2017, as the collection is deemed probable based on the insurance contracts we had in place at the time of the losses, which is included in the line item “Accounts receivable” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Highlights from the three month period ended October 28, 2017 compared with the three month period ended October 29, 2016 include the following:

18

Highlights from the nine month period ended October 28, 2017 compared with the nine month period ended October 29, 2016 include the following:

Fiscal Year

Fiscal 2017 is defined as the 53 week year ended February 3, 2018. Fiscal 2016 is defined as the 52 week year ending January 28, 2017.

Store Openings, Closings, and Relocations

During the nine month period ended October 28, 2017, we opened 47 new stores, inclusive of five relocations, and closed three stores, exclusive of the aforementioned relocations, bringing our store count as of October 28, 2017 to 631 stores, inclusive of an internet store.

Newly Adopted Accounting Standards

During the first quarter of Fiscal 2017, we adopted the new share based accounting standard. As a result of this standard, we now recognize excess tax benefits as a reduction to the line item “Income tax expense” in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The adoption of the new standard improved our net income per share during the three and nine month periods ended October 28, 2017 by $0.04 and $0.20, respectively, driven by a lower effective tax rate of 430 basis points and 730 basis points, respectively. Refer to Note 1 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and their impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Ongoing Initiatives for Fiscal 2017

We continue to focus on a number of ongoing initiatives aimed at increasing our overall profitability by improving our comparable store sales trends, increasing total sales growth and reducing expenses. These initiatives include, but are not limited to:

We intend to continue to increase comparable store sales through the following initiatives:

19

We intend to expand and enhance our retail store base through the following initiatives:

We intend to increase our operating margins through the following initiatives:

Uncertainties and Challenges

As we strive to increase profitability through achieving positive comparable store sales and leveraging productivity initiatives focused on improving the in-store experience, more efficient movement of products from the vendors to the selling floors, and modifying our marketing plans to increase our core customer base and increase our share of our current customers’ spending, there are

20

uncertainties and challenges that we face as an off-price retailer of apparel and accessories for men, women and children and home furnishings that could have a material impact on our revenues or income.

Seasonality of Sales and Weather Conditions. Our sales, like most other retailers, are subject to seasonal influences, with the majority of our sales and net income derived during the second half of the year, which includes the back-to-school and holiday seasons.

Weather continues to be a contributing factor to the sale of our clothing. Generally, our sales are higher if the weather is cold during the Fall and warm during the early Spring. Sales of cold weather clothing are increased by early cold weather during the Fall, while sales of warm weather clothing are improved by early warm weather conditions in the Spring. Although we have diversified our product offerings, we believe traffic to our stores is still driven, in part, by weather patterns.

General Economic Conditions. Consumer spending habits, including spending for the merchandise that we sell, are affected by, among other things, prevailing global economic conditions, inflation, levels of employment, salaries and wage rates, prevailing interest rates, housing costs, energy costs, commodities pricing, income tax rates and policies, consumer confidence and consumer perception of economic conditions. In addition, consumer purchasing patterns may be influenced by consumers’ disposable income, credit availability and debt levels.

A slowdown in the U.S. economy, an uncertain global economic outlook or a credit crisis could adversely affect consumer spending habits resulting in lower net sales and profits than expected on a quarterly or annual basis. Consumer confidence is also affected by the domestic and international political situation. Our financial condition and operations could be impacted by changes in government regulations in areas including, but not limited to, taxes and healthcare. The outbreak or escalation of war, or the occurrence of terrorist acts or other hostilities in or affecting the U.S., could lead to a decrease in spending by consumers. In addition, natural disasters, industrial accidents and acts of war in various parts of the world could have the effect of disrupting supplies and raising prices globally which, in turn, may have adverse effects on the world and U.S. economies and lead to a downturn in consumer confidence and spending.

We closely monitor our net sales, gross margin, expenses and working capital. We have performed scenario planning such that if our net sales decline, we have identified variable costs that could be reduced to partially mitigate the impact of these declines. If we were to experience adverse economic trends and/or if our efforts to counteract the impacts of these trends are not sufficiently effective, there could be a negative impact on our financial performance and position in future fiscal periods.

Competition and Margin Pressure. We believe that in order to remain competitive, we must continue to offer brand-name merchandise at a discount to prices offered by other retailers as well as an assortment of merchandise that is appealing to our customers.

The U.S. retail apparel and home furnishings markets are highly fragmented and competitive. We compete for business with department stores, off-price retailers, internet retailers, specialty stores, discount stores, wholesale clubs, and outlet stores as well as with certain traditional, full-price retail chains that have developed off-price concepts. At various times throughout the year, traditional full-price department store chains and specialty shops offer brand-name merchandise at substantial markdowns, which can result in prices approximating those offered by us at our Burlington stores. We anticipate that competition will increase in the future. Therefore, we will continue to look for ways to differentiate our stores from those of our competitors.

The U.S. retail industry continues to face increased pressure on margins as overall challenging retail conditions have led consumers to be more value conscious. Our “open to buy” paradigm, in which we purchase both pre-season and in-season merchandise, allows us the flexibility to purchase less pre-season with the balance purchased in-season and opportunistically. It also provides us with the flexibility to shift purchases between suppliers and categories. This enables us to obtain better terms with our suppliers, which we expect to help offset any rising costs of goods.

Changes to import and export laws could have a direct impact on our income and an indirect impact on consumer prices. Unfortunately, we cannot predict any future changes in such laws.

Key Performance Measures

We consider numerous factors in assessing our performance. Key performance measures used by management include net income, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Operating Margin (which we may also refer to as Adjusted EBIT), comparable store sales, gross margin, inventory, store payroll as a percentage of net sales and liquidity.

Net income. We earned net income of $44.9 million during the three month period ended October 28, 2017 compared with net income of $32.4 million during the three month period ended October 29, 2016. We earned net income of $144.1 million during the

21

nine month period ended October 28, 2017 compared with net income of $90.3 million during the nine month period ended October 29, 2016. These improvements were primarily driven by our improved gross margin as well as an improvement in our income tax expense driven by the adoption of the new share based accounting standard.  These improvements were partially offset by increases in our selling, general and administrative expenses, as well as depreciation and amortization expense; refer to the section below entitled “Results of Operations” for further explanation.

Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Operating Margin: Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Operating Margin are non-GAAP financial measures of our performance.

We define Adjusted Net Income as net income, exclusive of the following items, if applicable: (i) net favorable lease amortization; (ii) costs related to debt amendments; (iii) stock option modification expense; (iv) loss on extinguishment of debt; (v) impairment charges; (vi) amounts related to certain litigation and (vii) other unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary expenses, losses, charges or gains, all of which are tax effected to arrive at Adjusted Net Income.

We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income, exclusive of the following items, if applicable: (i) interest expense, net; (ii) loss on extinguishment of debt; (iii) income tax expense (benefit); (iv) depreciation and amortization; (v) impairment charges; (vi) stock option modification expense; (vii) costs related to debt amendments; (viii) amounts related to certain litigation and (ix) other unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary expenses, losses, charges or gains.

We define Adjusted Operating Margin as net income, exclusive of the following items, if applicable: (i) interest expense, net, (ii) loss on extinguishment of debt, (iii) income tax expense (benefit), (iv) impairment charges, (v) stock option modification expense, (vi) net favorable lease amortization, (vii) costs related to debt amendments, (viii) amounts related to certain litigation and (ix) other unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary expenses, losses, charges or gains.

We present Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Operating Margin because we believe they are useful supplemental measures in evaluating the performance of our business and provide greater transparency into our results of operations. In particular, we believe that excluding certain items that may vary substantially in frequency and magnitude from operating income are useful supplemental measures that assist in evaluating our ability to generate earnings and leverage sales, and to more readily compare these metrics between past and future periods.

Adjusted Net Income has limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered either in isolation or as a substitute for net income or other data prepared in accordance with GAAP. Among other limitations, Adjusted Net Income does not reflect:

During the three and nine months ended October 28, 2017, Adjusted Net Income improved $12.5 million to $48.8 million and $50.6 million to $156.8 million, respectively. These improvements were primarily driven by our improved gross margin as well as an improvement in our income tax expense driven by the adoption of the new share based accounting standard, partially offset by increased selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization expense, net of the tax effect of the adjustments cited above. Refer to the section below entitled “Results of Operations” for further explanation.

22

The following table shows our reconciliation of net income to Adjusted Net Income for the three and nine months ended October 28, 2017 compared with the three and nine months ended October 29, 2016: