CACI INTERNATIONAL INC /DE/ - Quarter Report: 2013 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

OR

Commission File Number 001-31400

CACI International Inc

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1100 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA 22201

(Address of principal executive offices)

(703) 841-7800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x.    No  ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x.    No  ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨.    No  x.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of Common Stock, as of October 31, 2013: CACI International Inc Common Stock, $0.10 par value, 23,425,631 shares.

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

2

Table of Contents

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

5

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

6

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of CACI International Inc and subsidiaries (CACI or the Company) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and include the assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows for the Company, including its subsidiaries and joint ventures that are more than 50 percent owned or otherwise controlled by the Company. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and amounts included in other current assets and current liabilities that meet the definition of a financial instrument approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these amounts. The fair value of the Company’s debt outstanding as of September 30, 2013 under its bank credit facility approximates its carrying value. The fair value of the Company’s debt under its bank credit facility was estimated using Level 2 inputs based on market data on companies with a corporate rating similar to CACI’s that have recently priced credit facilities. The fair value of the Company’s $300.0 million of 2.125 percent convertible senior subordinated notes issued May 16, 2007 and that mature on May 16, 2014 (the Notes) is based on quoted market prices using Level 1 inputs. See Notes 3 and 9.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications (all of which are of a normal, recurring nature) that are necessary for the fair presentation of the periods presented. It is suggested that these unaudited consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s latest annual report to the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013. The results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent interim period or for the full fiscal year.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period’s financial statements to conform to the current presentation.

Intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

7

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

Intangible assets are primarily amortized on an accelerated basis over periods ranging from one to fifteen years. The weighted-average period of amortization for all customer contracts and related customer relationships as of September 30, 2013 is 9.0 years, and the weighted-average remaining period of amortization is 7.8 years. The weighted-average period of amortization for acquired technologies as of September 30, 2013 is 6.7 years, and the weighted-average remaining period of amortization is 5.0 years.

Expected amortization expense for the remainder of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, and for each of the fiscal years thereafter, is as follows (in thousands):

Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

Bank Credit Facility

The Company has a $900.0 million credit facility (the Credit Facility), which consists of a $750.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Facility) and a $150.0 million term loan (the Term Loan). The Revolving Facility has subfacilities of $50.0 million for same-day swing line loan borrowings and $25.0 million for stand-by letters of credit. At any time and so long as no default has occurred, the Company has the right to increase the Revolving Facility or the Term Loan in an aggregate principal amount of up to the greater of $250.0 million or an amount subject to 2.75 times secured leverage, calculated assuming the Revolving Facility is fully drawn, with applicable lender approvals. The Credit Facility is available to refinance existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including working capital expenses and capital expenditures. The Credit Facility matures on August 6, 2018.

The Revolving Facility is a secured facility that permits continuously renewable borrowings of up to $750.0 million. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had $200.0 million outstanding under the Revolving Facility, no borrowings on the swing line and an outstanding letter of credit of $0.4 million. The Company pays a quarterly facility fee for the unused portion of the Revolving Facility.

The Term Loan is a five-year secured facility under which, principal payments are due in quarterly installments of $1.9 million through September 30, 2016 and $3.8 million thereafter until the balance is due in full on August 6, 2018.

The interest rates applicable to loans under the Credit Facility are floating interest rates that, at the Company’s option, equal a base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin based upon the Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio. As of September 30, 2013, the effective interest rate, including the impact of the Company’s floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements and excluding the effect of amortization of debt financing costs, for the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was 2.08 percent.

8

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

The Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with certain financial covenants, including a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The Credit Facility also includes customary negative covenants restricting or limiting the Company’s ability to guarantee or incur additional indebtedness, grant liens or other security interests to third parties, make loans or investments, transfer assets, declare dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock or make other distributions, prepay subordinated indebtedness and engage in mergers, acquisitions or other business combinations, in each case except as expressly permitted under the Credit Facility. Since the inception of the Credit Facility, the Company has been in compliance with all of the financial covenants. A majority of the Company’s assets serve as collateral under the Credit Facility.

The Company has capitalized $9.3 million of debt issuance costs associated with the Credit Facility. All debt issuance costs are being amortized from the date incurred to the expiration date of the Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2013, $3.9 million of the unamortized balance is included in long-term debt and $1.6 million is included in other long-term assets.

Convertible Notes Payable

Effective May 16, 2007, the Company issued the Notes in a private placement. The Notes were issued at par value and are subordinate to the Company’s senior secured debt. Interest on the Notes is payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The Notes mature on May 1, 2014.

Holders may convert their notes at a conversion rate of 18.2989 shares of CACI common stock for each $1,000 of note principal (an initial conversion price of $54.65 per share) under the following circumstances: 1) if the last reported sale price of CACI stock is greater than or equal to 130 percent of the applicable conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter; 2) during the five consecutive business day period immediately after any ten consecutive trading day period (the note measurement period) in which the average of the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of convertible note was equal to or less than 97 percent of the average product of the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock and the conversion rate of each date during the note measurement period; 3) upon the occurrence of certain corporate events constituting a fundamental change, as defined in the indenture governing the Notes; or 4) during the last three-month period prior to maturity. CACI is required to satisfy 100 percent of the principal amount of these notes solely in cash, with any amounts above the principal amount to be satisfied in common stock. As of September 30, 2013, none of the conditions permitting conversion of the Notes had been satisfied.

In the event of a fundamental change, as defined in the indenture governing the Notes, holders may require the Company to repurchase the Notes at a price equal to the principal amount plus any accrued interest. Also, if certain fundamental changes occur prior to maturity, the Company will in certain circumstances increase the conversion rate by a number of additional shares of common stock or, in lieu thereof, the Company may in certain circumstances elect to adjust the conversion rate and related conversion obligation so that these notes are convertible into shares of the acquiring or surviving company. The Company is not permitted to redeem the Notes.

The Company separately accounts for the liability and the equity (conversion option) components of the Notes and recognizes interest expense on the Notes using an interest rate in effect for comparable debt instruments that do not contain conversion features. The effective interest rate for the Notes excluding the conversion option was determined to be 6.9 percent.

The fair value of the liability component of the Notes was calculated to be $221.9 million at May 16, 2007, the date of issuance. The excess of the $300.0 million of gross proceeds over the $221.9 million fair value of the liability component, or $78.1 million, represents the fair value of the equity component, which was recorded, net of income tax effect, as additional paid-in capital within shareholders’ equity. This $78.1 million difference represents a debt discount that is amortized over the seven-year term of the Notes as a non-cash component of interest expense. The components of interest expense related to the Notes were as follows (in thousands):

9

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

The balance of the unamortized discount as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, was $8.1 million and $11.4 million, respectively. The balance as of September 30, 2013 will be amortized as additional, non-cash interest expense over the remaining term of the Notes (through May 1, 2014) using the effective interest method.

The fair value of the Notes as of September 30, 2013 was $382.5 million based on quoted market values.

The contingently issuable shares that may result from the conversion of the Notes were included in CACI’s diluted share count for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 because CACI’s average stock price during both three month periods was above the conversion price of $54.65 per share. Of total debt issuance costs of $7.8 million, $5.8 million is being amortized to interest expense over seven years. The remaining $2.0 million of debt issuance costs attributable to the embedded conversion option was recorded in additional paid-in capital. Upon closing of the sale of the Notes, $45.5 million of the net proceeds was used to concurrently repurchase one million shares of CACI’s common stock.

In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company purchased in a private transaction at a cost of $84.4 million call options (the Call Options) to purchase approximately 5.5 million shares of its common stock at a price equal to the conversion price of $54.65 per share. The cost of the Call Options was recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. The Call Options allow CACI to receive shares of its common stock from the counterparties equal to the amount of common stock related to the excess conversion value that CACI would pay the holders of the Notes upon conversion.

For income tax reporting purposes, the Notes and the Call Options are integrated. This created an original issue discount for income tax reporting purposes, and therefore the cost of the Call Options is being accounted for as interest expense over the term of the Notes for income tax reporting purposes. The associated income tax benefit of $32.8 million to be realized for income tax reporting purposes over the term of the Notes was recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital and a long-term deferred tax asset. The majority of this deferred tax asset is offset in the Company’s balance sheet by the $30.7 million deferred tax liability associated with the non-cash interest expense to be recorded for financial reporting purposes.

In addition, the Company sold warrants (the Warrants) to issue approximately 5.5 million shares of CACI common stock at an exercise price of $68.31 per share. The proceeds from the sale of the Warrants totaled $56.5 million and were recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital.

On a combined basis, the Call Options and the Warrants are intended to reduce the potential dilution of CACI’s common stock in the event that the Notes are converted by effectively increasing the conversion price of these notes from $54.65 to $68.31. The Call Options are anti-dilutive and are therefore excluded from the calculation of diluted shares outstanding. The Warrants will result in additional diluted shares outstanding if CACI’s average common stock price exceeds $68.31. The Call Options and the Warrants are separate and legally distinct instruments that bind CACI and the counterparties and have no binding effect on the holders of the Notes.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company periodically uses derivative financial instruments as part of a strategy to manage exposure to market risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. On April 5, 2012, the Company entered into two floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $100.0 million ($50.0 million for each agreement) related to a portion of the Company’s floating rate indebtedness. The agreements were effective beginning July 1, 2013 and mature July 3, 2017. The Company designated the interest rate swap agreements as cash flow hedges. Unrealized gains are recognized as assets while unrealized losses are recognized as liabilities. The interest rate swap agreements are highly correlated to the changes in interest rates to which the Company is exposed. Unrealized gains and losses on these swaps are designated as effective or ineffective. The effective portion of such gains or losses is recorded as a component of

10

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, while the ineffective portion of such gains or losses will be recorded as a component of interest expense. Future realized gains and losses in connection with each required interest payment will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss to interest expense. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

The effect of derivative instruments in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (in thousands):

The aggregate maturities of long-term debt at September 30, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

The Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims, and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Management is of the opinion that any liability or loss associated with such matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations and liquidity.

Government Contracting

Payments to the Company on cost-plus-fee and time-and-materials contracts are subject to adjustment upon audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA). The DCAA is currently in the process of auditing the Company’s incurred cost submissions for the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2008. The DCAA has completed its audits of the Company’s incurred cost submissions for the year ended June 30, 2006, and the Company is awaiting the Defense Contract Management Agency’s decisions regarding those incurred cost submissions. In the opinion of management, audit adjustments that may result from audits not yet completed or started are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as the Company has accrued its best estimate of potential disallowances. Additionally, the DCAA continually reviews the cost accounting and other practices of government contractors, including the Company. In the course of those reviews, cost accounting and other issues are identified, discussed and settled.

On March 26, 2012, the Company received a subpoena from the Defense Criminal Investigative Service seeking documents related to one of the Company’s contracts for the period of January 1, 2007 through March 26, 2012. The Company is providing documents responsive to the subpoena and cooperating fully with the government’s investigation. The Company has accrued its current best estimate of the potential outcome within its estimated range of zero to $1.8 million.

11

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

German Value-Added Taxes

The Company is under audit by the German tax authorities for issues related to value-added tax returns. At this time, the Company has not been assessed any deficiency and, based on sound factual and legal precedent, believes it is in compliance with the applicable value-added tax regulations. The Company has not accrued any liability for this matter because an unfavorable outcome is not considered probable. The Company estimates the range of reasonably possible losses to be between $1.5 million and $3.5 million.

Virginia Sales and Use Tax Audit

The Company is under audit for sales and use tax related issues by the Commonwealth of Virginia. While no assessment has been issued, the Company has accrued its current best estimate of the potential outcome within its estimated range of $0.9 million to $3.7 million.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized, together with the income tax benefits recognized, is as follows (in thousands):

Under the terms of its 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan), the Company may issue, among others, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, SSARs, and performance awards, collectively referred to herein as equity instruments. During the periods presented all equity instrument grants were made in the form of RSUs. Other than performance-based RSUs which contain a market-based element, the fair value of RSU grants was determined based on the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of RSUs with market-based vesting features was also measured on the grant date, but was done so using a binomial lattice model.

Annual grants under the 2006 Plan are generally made to the Company’s key employees during the first quarter of the Company’s fiscal year and to members of the Company’s Board of Directors during the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal year. With the approval of its Chief Executive Officer, the Company also issues equity instruments to strategic new hires and to employees who have demonstrated superior performance. In September 2013, the Company made its annual grant to its key employees consisting of 202,170 Performance Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs). The final number of such performance-based RSUs which will be considered earned by the participants and eventually vest is based on the achievement of a specified Net After Tax Profit (NATP) for the year ending June 30, 2014 and on the average share price of Company stock for the 90 day period ending September 13, 2014 as compared to the average share price for the 90 day period ended September 13, 2013. No PRSUs will be earned if the specified NATP for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014 is not met. If NATP for the year ending June 30, 2014 exceeds the specified NATP and the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ending September 13, 2014 exceeds the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ended September 13, 2013 by 100 percent or more then an additional 202,170 RSUs could be earned by participants. This is the maximum number of additional RSUs that can be earned related to the September 2013 annual grant. In addition to the performance and market conditions, there is a service vesting condition which stipulates that 50 percent of the earned award will vest on September 1, 2016 and 50 percent of the earned award will vest on September 1, 2017, in both cases dependent upon continuing service by the grantee as an employee of the Company, unless the grantee is eligible for earlier vesting upon retirement, as defined.

The total number of shares authorized by shareholders for grants under the 2006 Plan and its predecessor plan is 12,450,000 as of September 30, 2013. The aggregate number of grants that may be made may exceed this approved amount as forfeited SSARs, stock options, restricted stock and RSUs, and vested but unexercised SSARs and stock

12

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

options that expire, become available for future grants. As of September 30, 2013, cumulative grants of 13,129,660 equity instruments underlying the shares authorized have been awarded, and 4,033,221 of these instruments have been forfeited.

Activity related to SSARs/non-qualified stock options and RSUs during the three months ended September 30, 2013 is as follows:

As of September 30, 2013, there was $30.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs scheduled to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.5 years.

ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (ASC 260), requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share on the face of the income statement. Basic earnings per share exclude dilution and are computed by dividing income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock but not securities that are anti-dilutive, including stock options and SSARs with an exercise price greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock. Using the treasury stock method, diluted earnings per share include the incremental effect of SSARs, stock options, restricted shares, and those RSUs that are no longer subject to a market or performance condition. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, there were forty eight thousand weighted-average common stock equivalents excluded from the diluted per share computation due to their anti-dilutive effects. There were no anti-dilutive common stock equivalents for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The PRSUs granted in September 2013 are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the underlying shares are considered to be contingently issuable shares. These shares will be included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share beginning in the first reporting period in which the performance metric is achieved. The shares underlying the Notes were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 because the average share price was above the conversion price during both three month periods. The Warrants were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share during both periods presented because the Warrants’ exercise price of $68.31 was greater than the average market price of a share of Company common stock during the three month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The chart below shows the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

13

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. Tax statutes and regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to interpretation and require the application of significant judgment. The Company is currently under examination by two state jurisdictions and one foreign jurisdiction for years ended June 30, 2004 through June 30, 2012. The Company does not expect the resolution of these examinations to have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

The Company’s total liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013 was $8.8 million and $8.2 million, respectively. Of the $8.8 million unrecognized tax benefit at September 30, 2013, $2.7 million, if recognized, would impact the Company’s effective tax rate.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company corrected the classification of $4.2 million of deferred tax liabilities by reclassifying this amount from non-current deferred tax liabilities to a reduction of current deferred tax assets and concluded that this reclassification was not material.

The Company reports operating results and financial data in two segments: domestic operations and international operations. Domestic operations provide information solutions and services to its customers. Its customers are primarily U.S. federal government agencies. Other customers of the Company’s domestic operations include state and local governments and commercial enterprises. The Company does not measure revenue or profit by its major market areas or service offerings, either for internal management or external financial reporting purposes, as it would be impractical to do so. The Company places employees in locations around the world in support of its clients. International operations offer services to both commercial and non-U.S. government customers primarily within the Company’s business systems and enterprise IT markets. The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on net income attributable to CACI. Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is as follows (in thousands):

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in an orderly transaction. The market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset or liability is known as the principal market. When no principal market exists, the most advantageous market is used. This is the market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the price that maximizes the amount that would be received or minimizes the amount that would be paid. Fair value is based on assumptions market participants would make in pricing the asset or liability. Generally, fair value is based on observable quoted market prices or derived from observable market data when such market prices or data are available. When such prices or inputs are not available, the reporting entity should use valuation models.

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized based on the priority of the inputs used to measure fair value. The inputs used in measuring fair value are categorized into three levels, as follows:

14

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

The Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value included non-corporate owned life insurance (COLI) money market investments and mutual funds held in the Company’s supplemental retirement savings plan (the Supplemental Savings Plan), contingent consideration in connection with past acquisitions and interest rate swap agreements. Contingent consideration recorded at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013 related to the February 1, 2012 U.K. acquisition of Tomorrow Communications, Ltd (TCL). The following table summarizes the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, and the level they fall within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):

Changes in the fair value of the assets held in connection with the Supplemental Savings Plan are recorded in indirect costs and selling expenses.

Contingent consideration at September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013 related to the requirement that the Company pay contingent consideration in the event TCL achieved certain specified earnings results during the one year period subsequent to acquisition. The Company determined the fair value of contingent consideration as of the acquisition date using a valuation model which included the evaluation of all possible outcomes and the application of an appropriate discount rate. At the end of each reporting period, the fair value of the contingent consideration is remeasured and any changes are recorded in indirect costs and selling expenses. During the three month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, this remeasurement did not result in a significant change to the liability recorded. The maximum contingent consideration associated with the TCL acquisition is approximately $6.0 million. During the year ended June 30, 2013, the Company determined that the maximum contingent consideration possible had been earned. One-half of this amount was paid to the former shareholders of TCL in February 2013. The remaining one-half is scheduled to be paid in February 2014.

Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.

On October 8, 2013, CACI signed a definitive agreement to acquire Six3 Systems, Inc., a provider of highly specialized support to the national security community in the areas of cyber and signals intelligence; intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; and intelligence operations, from private equity firm GTCR. The purchase price is $820 million and closing is anticipated during CACI’s quarter ending December 31, 2013, subject to regulatory approvals. As part of this transaction, CACI has secured a firm financing commitment for $800 million. CACI will finance the acquisition through this new commitment and borrowings under the Revolving Facility.

15

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

There are statements made herein which do not address historical facts and, therefore, could be interpreted to be forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated include, but are not limited to, the following: regional and national economic conditions in the United States and globally (including the impact of uncertainty regarding U.S. debt limits and actions taken related thereto); terrorist activities or war; changes in interest rates; currency fluctuations; significant fluctuations in the equity markets; changes in our effective tax rate; failure to achieve contract awards in connection with re-competes for present business and/or competition for new business; the risks and uncertainties associated with client interest in and purchases of new products and/or services; continued funding of U.S. government or other public sector projects, based on a change in spending patterns, implementation of spending cuts (sequestration) under the Budget Control Act of 2011, changes in budgetary priorities, or in the event of a priority need for funds, such as homeland security; government contract procurement (such as bid protest, small business set asides, loss of work due to organizational conflicts of interest, etc.) and termination risks; the results of government audits and reviews conducted by the Defense Contract Audit Agency, the Defense Contract Management Agency, or other governmental entities with cognizant oversight; individual business decisions of our clients; paradigm shifts in technology; competitive factors such as pricing pressures and/or competition to hire and retain employees (particularly those with security clearances); market speculation regarding our continued independence; material changes in laws or regulations applicable to our businesses, particularly in connection with (i) government contracts for services, (ii) outsourcing of activities that have been performed by the government, and (iii) competition for task orders under Government Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs) and/or schedule contracts with the General Services Administration; the ability to successfully integrate the operations of our recent and any future acquisitions; our own ability to achieve the objectives of near term or long range business plans; and other risks described in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

Overview

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is provided to enhance the understanding of, and should be read together with, our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

We derived 94.2 percent and 94.5 percent of our revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, from contracts with U.S. government agencies. These were derived through both prime and subcontractor relationships. We also provide services to state and local governments, commercial customers, and through our international operations, to non-U.S. government agencies. We provide our services and solutions to our clients in the following market areas:

16

Table of Contents

17

Table of Contents

18

Table of Contents

We continue to carefully follow federal budget, legislative and contracting trends and activities and evolve our strategies to take these into consideration. Between October 1 and October 16, 2013, there was no funding of federal agencies and programs either by discretionary funding through annual appropriations acts or interim continuing resolutions (CRs). When federal agencies and programs lack either appropriated or interim funding, they experience a funding gap and, under the Antideficiency Act, passed in 1870 and amended several times, they must cease operations, or shutdown, except in certain emergency situations or when law authorizes continued activity. This recent government shutdown necessitated furloughs of several hundred thousand federal employees, required cessation or reduction of many government activities, and affected numerous sectors of the economy. During that time period, a number of our employees were unable to perform work on their assigned contracts. We estimate the impact of the government shutdown on us to be $10 million of reduced revenue and $4 million of reduced operating income, with the negative impacts in the three month period ending December 31, 2013, being partially offset by our ability to make up some of the lost work during the second half of our year ending June 30, 2014.

On March 1, 2013, under the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA), the President ordered sequestration to go into effect. On April 10, 2013, also under the terms of the BCA, the President signed a sequestration order which directs that total discretionary spending for the government’s fiscal year 2014 be reduced by $91 billion. Under sequestration, reductions in both defense and civil agency expenditures went into effect. We expect the impact of sequestration on contracts and task orders we hold to continue throughout our Fiscal Year 2014 as our customers continue to disclose how they are implementing reductions in expenditures required by the BCA.

We are continuously reviewing our operations in an attempt to identify those programs that are at risk from sequestration so that we can make appropriate contingency plans. We are experiencing reduced funding on some of our programs, and may experience further reductions, but we do not expect the cancellation of any of our major programs.

We also continue to face some uncertainties due to the current general business environment, and we continue to see a number of protests of major contract awards and delays in government procurement activities. In addition, many of our federal government contracts require us to employ personnel with security clearances, specific levels of education and specific past work experience. Depending on the level of clearance, security clearances can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain and competition for skilled personnel in the information technology services industry is intense. In addition, a shift of expenditures away from programs that we support could cause federal government agencies to reduce their purchases under contracts, to exercise their right to terminate contracts at any time without penalty, or to decide not to exercise options to renew contracts. Additional factors that could affect our federal government contracting business include an increase in set-asides for small businesses and budgetary priorities limiting or delaying federal government spending in general.

19

Table of Contents

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Revenue. The table below sets forth revenue by customer type with related percentages of total revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively:

For the three months ended September 30, 2013, total revenue decreased by 7.2 percent, or $67.0 million, over the same period a year ago. This decrease in revenue was primarily attributable to a reduction in material purchases and subcontract labor resulting from the drawndown in Southwest Asia and federal government budget-related reduction activities.

DoD revenue decreased 12.4 percent, or $87.4 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same period a year ago, for the reasons described above. DoD revenue includes services provided to the U.S. Army, our largest customer, where our services focus on supporting readiness, tactical military intelligence, and communications systems. DoD revenue also includes work with the U.S. Navy and other DoD agencies across all of our major service offerings.

Revenue from federal civilian agencies increased 12.3 percent, or $21.5 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same period a year ago. This increase was primarily attributable to acquisitions completed during the three month period ended December 31, 2012. Federal civilian agency revenue also includes services provided to non-DoD national intelligence agencies.

Commercial and other revenue decreased 3.1 percent, or $1.5 million, during the three months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same period a year ago. Commercial revenue is derived from both international and domestic operations. International operations accounted for 71.5 percent, or $33.4 million, of total commercial revenue, while domestic operations accounted for 28.5 percent, or $13.3 million.

Revenue from state and local governments increased by 13.7 percent, or $0.5 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the same period a year ago. Revenue from state and local governments represented less than one percent of our total revenue for both the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

20

Table of Contents

Income from Operations. The following table sets forth the relative percentage that certain items of expense and earnings bore to revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Income from operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was $61.2 million. This was a decrease of $3.6 million, or 5.5 percent, from income from operations of $64.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. This decrease was primarily attributable to a loss during the three months ended September 30, 2013 on a fixed price contract. Our operating margin of 7.1 percent for the period ended September 30, 2013 increased from 7.0 percent during the period ended September 30, 2012.

As a percentage of revenue, direct costs were 69.6 percent and 69.3 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Direct costs include direct labor and other direct costs (ODCs), which include, among other costs, subcontracted labor and material purchases. ODCs are common in our industry and may vary from period to period. The single largest component of direct costs, direct labor, was $248.8 million and $252.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. ODCs were $352.6 million and $393.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease in ODCs was primarily driven by a reduction in material purchases and subcontract labor resulting from the drawndown in Southwest Asia and federal government budget-related reduction activities.

Indirect costs and selling expenses include fringe benefits (attributable to both direct and indirect labor), marketing and bid and proposal costs, indirect labor, and other discretionary expenses. As a percentage of revenue, indirect costs and selling expenses were 21.8 percent and 22.3 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. This decrease is due primarily to cost reduction activities that were initiated during the second half of FY2013. Total stock compensation expense, a component of indirect costs, was $2.5 million and $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Indirect costs for the three months ended September 30, 2013, included $1.7 million of acquisition-related expenses associated with the planned acquisition of Six3 Systems, Inc., which is expected to be completed during the three month period ending December 31, 2013.

Depreciation and amortization expense was relatively flat, at $13.0 million and $13.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Interest expense and other, net increased $0.6 million, or 8.9 percent, during the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period a year ago. The increase was primarily attributable to accrued interest related to our ongoing Virginia sales and use tax audit.

21

Table of Contents

The effective tax rate was 38.2 percent and 38.1 percent during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The tax rate reported during the first quarter of both FY2014 and FY2013 was favorably impacted by non-taxable gains on assets invested in corporate owned life insurance (COLI) policies to date. If gains or losses on these investments throughout the rest of the current fiscal year vary from our estimates, our effective tax rate will fluctuate in future quarters of the year ending June 30, 2014.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2013, our Credit Facility was a $900.0 million credit facility, which included a $750.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Facility), and a $150.0 million term loan (the Term Loan). The Credit Facility matures on August 6, 2018.

The Revolving Facility is a secured facility that permits continuously renewable borrowings and has subfacilities of $50.0 million for same-day swing line borrowings and $25.0 million for stand-by letters of credit. As of September 30, 2013, we had $200.0 million outstanding under the Revolving Facility, no borrowings on the swing line and an outstanding letter of credit of $0.4 million.

The Term Loan is a five-year secured facility under which principal payments are due in quarterly installments of $1.9 million through September 30, 2016 and $3.8 million thereafter until the balance is due in full on August 6, 2018. As of September 30, 2013, $131.3 million was outstanding under the Term Loan.

At any time and so long as no default has occurred, we have the right to increase the Term Loan or Revolving Facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to the greater of $250.0 million or an amount subject to 2.75 times secured leverage, calculated assuming the Revolving Facility is fully drawn, with applicable lender approvals.

The interest rates applicable to loans under the Credit Facility are floating interest rates that, at our option, equal a base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin based upon our consolidated total leverage ratio.

The Credit Facility requires us to comply with certain financial covenants, including a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The Credit Facility also includes customary negative covenants restricting or limiting our ability to guarantee or incur additional indebtedness, grant liens or other security interests to third parties, make loans or investments, transfer assets, declare dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock or make other distributions, prepay subordinated indebtedness and engage in mergers, acquisitions or other business combinations, in each case except as expressly permitted under the Credit Facility. Since the inception of the Credit Facility, we have been in compliance with all of the financial covenants. A majority of our assets serve as collateral under the Credit Facility.

Effective May 16, 2007, we issued the Notes, which mature on May 1, 2014, in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. The Notes are subordinate to our senior secured debt, and interest on the Notes is payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year.

Holders may convert their notes at a conversion rate of 18.2989 shares of CACI common stock for each $1,000 of note principal (an initial conversion price of $54.65 per share) under the following circumstances: 1) if the last reported sale price of CACI stock is greater than or equal to 130 percent of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter; 2) during the five consecutive business day period immediately after any ten consecutive trading day period (the note measurement period) in which the average of the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of convertible note was equal to or less than 97 percent of the average product of the closing price of a share of our common stock and the conversion rate of each date during the note measurement period; 3) upon the occurrence of certain corporate events, as defined; or 4) during the last three-month period prior to maturity. We are required to satisfy 100 percent of the principal amount of these notes solely in cash, with any amounts above the principal amount to be satisfied in common stock. As of September 30, 2013, none of the conditions permitting conversion of the Notes had been satisfied.

In the event of a fundamental change, as defined, holders may require us to repurchase the Notes at a price equal to the principal amount plus any accrued interest. Also, if certain fundamental changes occur prior to maturity, we will in certain circumstances increase the conversion rate by a number of additional shares of common stock or, in lieu thereof, we may in certain circumstances elect to adjust the conversion rate and related conversion obligation so that these notes are convertible into shares of the acquiring or surviving company. We are not permitted to redeem the Notes.

In connection with the issuance of the Notes, we purchased in a private transaction at a cost of $84.4 million call options (the Call Options) to purchase approximately 5.5 million shares of our common stock at a price equal to the conversion price of

22

Table of Contents

$54.65 per share. The Call Options allow us to receive shares of our common stock from the counterparties equal to the amount of common stock related to the excess conversion value that we would pay the holders of the Notes upon conversion. In addition, we sold warrants (the Warrants) to issue approximately 5.5 million shares of CACI common stock at an exercise price of $68.31 per share. The proceeds from the sale of the Warrants totaled $56.5 million. On a combined basis, the Call Options and the Warrants are intended to reduce the potential dilution of CACI’s common stock in the event that the Notes are converted by effectively increasing the conversion price of these notes from $54.65 to $68.31. The Call Options and the Warrants are separate and legally distinct instruments that bind us and the counterparties and have no binding effect on the holders of the Notes.

On October 8, 2013, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire Six3 Systems, Inc., a provider of highly specialized support to the national security community. The purchase price is $820 million, and closing is anticipated during the three month period ending December 31, 2013. To finance the acquisition, we have secured a firm financing commitment for $800 million.

Cash and cash equivalents were $102.7 million and $64.3 million as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, respectively. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was primarily attributable to cash provided by operating activities along with additional borrowings under our Revolving Facility. Our operating cash flow was $27.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $71.3 million for the same period a year ago. The current year decrease in operating cash flow resulted primarily from the slowdown of invoice payments by our government customers. This slowdown was caused in part by sequestration-related furloughs of government payment office employees. Days-sales outstanding increased to 65 at September 30, 2013, compared to 57 days at September 30, 2012.

We used cash in investing activities of $4.0 million and $49.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. This decrease in cash used during the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period a year ago was primarily because we completed the acquisition of Delta Solutions and Technologies, Inc. during the three month period ended September 30, 2012 and closed no acquisitions during the current quarter.

Cash provided by financing activities was $14.2 million and $10.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, we had net borrowings of $136.1 million under our Credit Facility and used $124.4 million to repurchase 2.2 million shares of our common stock. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 we had net borrowings of $18.6 million under our Credit Facility.

Cash flows from financing activities include proceeds received from the exercise of stock options and purchases of stock under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan totaling $1.0 million and $1.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

We believe that the combination of internally generated funds, available bank borrowings and cash and cash equivalents on hand will provide the required liquidity and capital resources necessary to fund on-going operations, customary capital expenditures, debt service obligations, and other working capital requirements over the next twelve months. We expect to pay off the Notes with funds available under the Credit Facility or with cash on hand, or with cash proceeds from a new debt security. Over the longer term, our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations necessary to fulfill the obligations under the Credit Facility and the additional financing associated with the anticipated Six3 Sytems acquisition will depend on our future financial performance which will be affected by many factors outside of our control, including worldwide economic and financial market conditions.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

We use off-balance sheet arrangements to finance the lease of operating facilities. We have financed the use of all of our current office and warehouse facilities through operating leases. Operating leases are also used to finance the use of computers, servers, phone systems, motor vehicles in the U.K., and to a lesser extent, other fixed assets, such as furnishings, that are obtained in connection with business acquisitions. We generally assume the lease rights and obligations of companies acquired in business combinations and continue financing equipment under operating leases until the end of the lease term following the acquisition date. We generally do not finance capital expenditures with operating leases, but instead finance such purchases with available cash balances. For additional information regarding our operating lease commitments, see Note 14 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013. The Credit Facility provides for stand-by letters of credit aggregating up to $25.0 million that reduce the funds available under the Revolving Facility when issued. As of September 30, 2013, we had an outstanding letter of credit of $0.4 million. We have no other material off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

23

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The interest rates on both the Term Loan and the Revolving Facility are affected by changes in market interest rates. We have the ability to manage these fluctuations in part through interest rate hedging alternatives in the form of interest rate swaps. In April 2012, we entered into floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $100 million related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness. The agreements were effective on July 1, 2013 and mature July 3, 2017. All outstanding balances under our Term Loan, and any amounts that may be borrowed under our Revolving Facility, are currently subject to interest rate fluctuations. With every one percent fluctuation in the applicable interest rates, interest expense on our variable rate debt for the three months ended September 30, 2013 would have fluctuated by approximately $0.8 million.

Approximately 3.9 percent and 3.5 percent of our total revenue in three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, was derived from our international operations headquartered in the U.K. Our practice in our international operations is to negotiate contracts in the same currency in which the predominant expenses are incurred, thereby mitigating the exposure to foreign currency exchange fluctuations. It is not possible to accomplish this in all cases; thus, there is some risk that profits will be affected by foreign currency exchange fluctuations. As of September 30, 2013, we held a combination of euros and pounds sterling in the U.K. and in the Netherlands equivalent to approximately $15.8 million. This allows us to better utilize our cash resources on behalf of our foreign subsidiaries, thereby mitigating foreign currency conversion risks.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the three month period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The effectiveness of a system of disclosure controls and procedures is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitation, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of internal controls, and fraud. Due to such inherent limitations, there can be only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that any system of disclosure controls and procedures will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud, or in making all material information known in a timely manner to appropriate levels of management.

Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level at September 30, 2013.

The Company reports that no changes in its internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

24

Table of Contents

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Al Shimari, et al. v. L-3 Services, Inc. et al.

Reference is made to Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013 for the most recently filed information concerning the suit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The lawsuit names CACI International Inc, CACI Premier Technology, Inc. and former CACI employee Timothy Dugan as Defendants, along with L-3 Services, Inc. Plaintiffs seek, inter alia, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees.

Since the filing of Registrant’s report described above, Plaintiffs’ appeal is pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Abbass, et al v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc. and CACI International Inc, Case No. 1:13CV1186-LMB/JFA (EDVA)

On September 20, 2013, fifty-five Plaintiffs filed a nine-count complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia styled Abbass, et al. v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc., et al. Plaintiffs are Iraqi nationals who assert that their allegations are essentially the same as those of the plaintiffs in Al Shimari. Plaintiffs claim that they suffered significant physical injury and emotional distress while in U.S. custody in Iraq. The lawsuit names CACI International Inc and CACI Premier Technology, Inc. as Defendants. The complaint alleges that Defendants conspired with U.S. military personnel to engage in illegal treatment of Iraqi detainees. The complaint does not allege any interaction between Plaintiffs and any CACI employee. Plaintiffs’ claims are brought pursuant to the Alien Tort Statute and the Torture Victims Protection Act. Plaintiffs seek, inter alia, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees.

Plaintiffs’ action was originally filed in 2009 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, but was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice in September 2011 after the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Saleh v. Titan Corp. and Ibrahim v. Titan Corp., 580 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

The CACI Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint. That motion is pending.

We are vigorously defending the above-described legal proceedings, and, based on our present knowledge of the facts, believe the lawsuits are completely without merit.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Reference is made to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013. There have been no material changes from the risk factors described in that report.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table provides certain information with respect to our purchases of shares of CACI International Inc’s common stock:

25

Table of Contents

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information

During the three month period ended September 30, 2013, the Company adopted a long-term incentive plan (the Plan) intended to incent the achievement of net after-tax profit and revenue growth objectives above and beyond those defined in the Company’s short-term incentive compensation plans. Pursuant to the terms of the Plan, eligible employees, including the Company’s Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, will receive a cash bonus if defined metrics are achieved during the Company’s fiscal years ending June 30, 2014, 2015, and 2016. No cash bonuses will be paid to any participant under the Plan until performance against the specified metrics has been measured for all three years, except in the case of separation of service for specified reasons such as death and long-term disability. As participants in the Plan, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer could earn annually a maximum amount of $691,000 and $405,000, respectively, if all metrics are achieved in each of the three fiscal years covered by the Plan.

26

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

27

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

28