CACI INTERNATIONAL INC /DE/ - Quarter Report: 2014 March (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014

OR

Commission File Number 001-31400

CACI International Inc

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1100 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA 22201

(Address of principal executive offices)

(703) 841-7800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x.    No  ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x.    No  ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨.    No  x.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of Common Stock, as of April 30, 2014: CACI International Inc Common Stock, $0.10 par value, 23,495,668 shares.

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

2

Table of Contents

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

5

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

6

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands)

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

7

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of CACI International Inc and subsidiaries (CACI or the Company) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and include the assets, liabilities, results of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows for the Company, including its subsidiaries and joint ventures that are more than 50 percent owned or otherwise controlled by the Company. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and amounts included in other current assets and current liabilities that meet the definition of a financial instrument approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these amounts. The fair value of the Company’s debt outstanding as of March 31, 2014 under its bank credit facility approximates its carrying value. The fair value of the Company’s debt under its bank credit facility was estimated using Level 2 inputs based on market data of companies with a corporate rating similar to CACI’s that have recently priced credit facilities. The fair value of the Company’s $300.0 million of 2.125 percent convertible senior subordinated notes issued May 16, 2007 and that mature on May 1, 2014 (the Notes) is based on quoted market prices using Level 1 inputs. See Notes 4, 10 and 11.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications (all of which are of a normal, recurring nature) that are necessary for the fair presentation of the periods presented. It is suggested that these unaudited consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s latest annual report to the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent interim period or for the full fiscal year.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period’s financial statements to conform to the current presentation.

On November 15, 2013, CACI completed the acquisition of Six3 Systems Holdings II, Inc. (Six3 Systems). Six3 Systems provides highly specialized support to the national security community in the areas of cyber and signals intelligence; intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; and intelligence operations. In connection with the acquisition, on November 15, 2013, CACI entered into a fifth amendment (the Amendment) to its credit agreement dated as of October 21, 2010 (the Credit Agreement). The Amendment modified the Credit Agreement to allow for the incurrence of $700 million in additional term loans and a $100 million increase in the revolving facility to finance the acquisition of Six3 Systems.

The initial purchase consideration paid at closing to acquire Six3 Systems was $820.0 million plus $25.8 million representing the estimated cash and net working capital adjustment, as defined in the agreement. Of the payment made at closing, $5.0 million was deposited into an escrow account pending final determination of the cash and net working capital acquired and $35.0 million was deposited into an escrow account to secure the sellers’ indemnification obligations (the Indemnification Amount). During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the parties agreed on the final cash and net working capital acquired and the $5.0 million in escrow was distributed in full to the sellers. Any remaining Indemnification Amount at the end of the indemnification period not encumbered as a result of one or more indemnification claims will be distributed to the sellers.

8

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

The fair values assigned to the intangible assets acquired were based on estimates, assumptions, and other information compiled by management, including independent valuations that utilized established valuation techniques. Based on the Company’s valuation, the total consideration of $847.3 million, which includes a final cash and net working capital adjustment of $1.4 million, has been allocated to assets acquired (including identifiable intangible assets and goodwill) and liabilities assumed (including deferred taxes on identifiable intangible assets that are not deductible for income tax purposes), as follows (in thousands):

The value attributed to customer contracts and customer relationships is being amortized on an accelerated basis over approximately 14 years. Of the value attributed to goodwill, $55.1 million is deductible for income tax purposes.

From the date of acquisition through March 31, 2014, Six3 Systems generated $153.6 million of revenue and $3.1 million of net income. Six3 Systems’ net income includes the impact of $7.8 million of amortization of customer contracts and customer relationships, as well as $2.5 million in expense associated with retention bonuses associated with retention agreements with certain Six3 Systems executives. The agreements provide for a payment upon the one and two year anniversaries of the acquisition, dependent upon continued employment by the executive as an employee of the Company. Six3 Systems’ net income does not include the impact of acquisition-related expenses incurred by CACI.

CACI incurred $11.6 million of acquisition-related expenses during the nine months ended March 31, 2014, including expenses and a loss on extinguishment associated with the additional indebtedness incurred in connection with the Amendment to the Credit Facility described above. These expenses are included in indirect costs and selling expenses. See Note 4 for additional information on the loss on extinguishment.

The following pro forma results are prepared for comparative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect the results that would have occurred had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the years presented or the results which may occur in the future. The following unaudited pro forma results of operations assume the Six3 Systems acquisition had occurred on July 1, 2012 (in thousands except per share amounts):

9

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

Intangible assets increased due to the Six3 Systems acquisition (see Note 2) and consisted of the following (in thousands):

Intangible assets are primarily amortized on an accelerated basis over periods ranging from one to fifteen years. The weighted-average period of amortization for all customer contracts and related customer relationships as of March 31, 2014 is 11.5 years, and the weighted-average remaining period of amortization is 11.7 years. The weighted-average period of amortization for acquired technologies as of March 31, 2014 is 6.7 years, and the weighted-average remaining period of amortization is 4.9 years.

Expected amortization expense for the remainder of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, and for each of the fiscal years thereafter, is as follows (in thousands):

Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

10

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

Bank Credit Facility

As of March 31, 2014, the Company has a $1.7 billion credit facility (the Credit Facility), which consists of an $850.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Facility) and an $831.3 million term loan (the Term Loan). The Revolving Facility has subfacilities of $50.0 million for same-day swing line loan borrowings and $25.0 million for stand-by letters of credit. At any time and so long as no default has occurred, the Company has the right to increase the Revolving Facility or the Term Loan in an aggregate principal amount of up to the greater of $400.0 million or an amount subject to 2.75 times senior secured leverage, calculated assuming the Revolving Facility is fully drawn, with applicable lender approvals. The Credit Facility is available to refinance existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including working capital expenses and capital expenditures. The Credit Facility was amended on November 15, 2013 in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Six3 Systems. See Note 2. Prior to the amendment, the Credit Facility consisted of a $750.0 million revolving credit facility and a $150.0 million term loan. In connection with the amendment, which allowed for the incurrence of $700.0 million of additional term loans and a $100.0 million increase in the Revolving Facility, the Company evaluated each creditor with ownership in the debt before and after the additional borrowings to determine whether the additional borrowings should be accounted for as a modification or an extinguishment of debt as it relates to each individual holder. As a result of this analysis, the Company recorded a $4.1 million loss on extinguishment within indirect costs and selling expenses in the three month period ended December 31, 2013. The Credit Facility matures on November 15, 2018.

The Revolving Facility is a secured facility that permits continuously renewable borrowings of up to $850.0 million. As of March 31, 2014, the Company had $190.0 million outstanding under the Revolving Facility, no borrowings on the swing line and an outstanding letter of credit of $0.4 million. The Company pays a quarterly facility fee for the unused portion of the Revolving Facility.

The Term Loan is a five-year secured facility under which principal payments are due in quarterly installments of $10.4 million through December 31, 2016 and $20.8 million thereafter until the balance is due in full on November 15, 2018.

The interest rates applicable to loans under the Credit Facility are floating interest rates that, at the Company’s option, equal a base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin based upon the Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio. As of March 31, 2014, the effective interest rate, including the impact of the Company’s floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements and excluding the effect of amortization of debt financing costs, for the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was 2.29 percent.

The Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with certain financial covenants, including a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The Credit Facility also includes customary negative covenants restricting or limiting the Company’s ability to guarantee or incur additional indebtedness, grant liens or other security interests to third parties, make loans or investments, transfer assets, declare dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock or make other distributions, prepay subordinated indebtedness and engage in mergers, acquisitions or other business combinations, in each case except as expressly permitted under the Credit Facility. Since the inception of the Credit Facility, the Company has been in compliance with all of the financial covenants. A majority of the Company’s assets serve as collateral under the Credit Facility.

The Company has capitalized $18.1 million of debt issuance costs associated with the Credit Facility. All debt issuance costs are being amortized from the date incurred to the expiration date of the Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2014, $5.5 million of the unamortized balance is included in long-term debt and $6.6 million is included in other long-term assets.

Convertible Notes Payable

Effective May 16, 2007, the Company issued the Notes in a private placement. The Notes were issued at par value and are subordinate to the Company’s senior secured debt. Interest on the Notes is payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The Notes mature on May 1, 2014. See Note 11.

The Company separately accounts for the liability and the equity (conversion option) components of the Notes and recognizes interest expense on the Notes using an interest rate in effect for comparable debt instruments that do not contain conversion features. The effective interest rate for the Notes excluding the conversion option was determined to be 6.9 percent.

11

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

The fair value of the liability component of the Notes was calculated to be $221.9 million at May 16, 2007, the date of issuance. The excess of the $300.0 million of gross proceeds over the $221.9 million fair value of the liability component, or $78.1 million, represents the fair value of the equity component, which was recorded, net of income tax effect, as additional paid-in capital within shareholders’ equity. This $78.1 million difference represents a debt discount that is amortized over the seven-year term of the Notes as a non-cash component of interest expense. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the components of interest expense related to the Notes were as follows (in thousands):

The balance of the unamortized discount as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013, was $1.2 million and $11.4 million, respectively. The balance as of March 31, 2014 will be amortized as additional, non-cash interest expense over the remaining term of the Notes (through May 1, 2014).

The fair value of the Notes as of March 31, 2014 was $418.5 million based on quoted market values.

The contingently issuable shares that may result from the conversion of the Notes were included in CACI’s diluted share count for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 because CACI’s average stock price during both three month periods was above the conversion price of $54.65 per share. Of total debt issuance costs of $7.8 million, $5.8 million is being amortized to interest expense over seven years. The remaining $2.0 million of debt issuance costs attributable to the embedded conversion option was recorded in additional paid-in capital. Upon closing of the sale of the Notes, $45.5 million of the net proceeds was used to concurrently repurchase one million shares of CACI’s common stock.

In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company purchased in a private transaction at a cost of $84.4 million call options (the Call Options) to purchase approximately 5.5 million shares of its common stock at a price equal to the conversion price of $54.65 per share. The cost of the Call Options was recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. The Call Options allow CACI to receive shares of its common stock from the counterparties equal to the amount of common stock related to the excess conversion value that CACI would pay the holders of the Notes upon conversion.

For income tax reporting purposes, the Notes and the Call Options are integrated. This created an original issue discount for income tax reporting purposes, and therefore the cost of the Call Options is being accounted for as interest expense over the term of the Notes for income tax reporting purposes. The associated income tax benefit of $32.8 million to be realized for income tax reporting purposes over the term of the Notes was recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital and a long-term deferred tax asset. The majority of this deferred tax asset was offset in the Company’s balance sheet by the $30.7 million deferred tax liability originally associated with the non-cash interest expense to be recorded for financial reporting purposes.

In addition, the Company sold warrants (the Warrants) to issue approximately 5.5 million shares of CACI common stock at an exercise price of $68.31 per share. The proceeds from the sale of the Warrants totaled $56.5 million and were recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital.

On a combined basis, the Call Options and the Warrants are intended to reduce the potential dilution of CACI’s common stock in the event that the Notes are converted by effectively increasing the conversion price of these notes from $54.65 to $68.31. The Call Options are anti-dilutive and are therefore excluded from the calculation of diluted shares outstanding. The Warrants result in additional diluted shares outstanding when CACI’s average common stock price exceeds $68.31. The Call Options and the Warrants are separate and legally distinct instruments that bind CACI and the counterparties and have no binding effect on the holders of the Notes.

12

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

The Company has classified the Notes as long-term on the accompanying balance sheet as of March 31, 2014 as the Company has sufficient borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility to repay the Notes when they come due.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company periodically uses derivative financial instruments as part of a strategy to manage exposure to market risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. The Company has entered into several floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $400.0 million which hedge a portion of the Company’s floating rate indebtedness. The swaps mature at various dates through 2019. The Company has designated the swaps as cash flow hedges. Unrealized gains are recognized as assets while unrealized losses are recognized as liabilities. The interest rate swap agreements are highly correlated to the changes in interest rates to which the Company is exposed. Unrealized gains and losses on these swaps are designated as effective or ineffective. The effective portion of such gains or losses is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, while the ineffective portion of such gains or losses is recorded as a component of interest expense. Realized gains and losses in connection with each required interest payment are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss to interest expense. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

The effect of derivative instruments in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows (in thousands):

The aggregate maturities of long-term debt at March 31, 2014 are as follows (in thousands):

The Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims, and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Management is of the opinion that any liability or loss associated with such matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations and liquidity.

Government Contracting

Payments to the Company on cost-plus-fee and time-and-materials contracts are subject to adjustment upon audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA). The DCAA has completed its audits of the Company’s incurred cost submissions for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 and on April 3, 2014 the Defense Contract Management Agency issued its final determinations regarding those incurred cost submissions. The Company intends to appeal both determinations. The DCAA is currently in the process of auditing the Company’s incurred cost submissions for the year ended June 30, 2008. In the opinion of management, adjustments that may result from these audits and the audits not yet started are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as the Company has accrued its best estimate of potential disallowances. Additionally, the DCAA continually reviews the cost accounting and other practices of government contractors, including the Company. In the course of those reviews, cost accounting and other issues are identified, discussed and settled.

13

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

On March 26, 2012, the Company received a subpoena from the Defense Criminal Investigative Service seeking documents related to one of the Company’s contracts for the period of January 1, 2007 through March 26, 2012. The Company is providing documents responsive to the subpoena and cooperating fully with the government’s investigation. The Company has accrued its current best estimate of the potential outcome within its estimated range of zero to $1.8 million.

German Value-Added Taxes

The Company is under audit by the German tax authorities for issues related to value-added tax returns. At this time, the Company has not been assessed any deficiency and, based on sound factual and legal precedent, believes it is in compliance with the applicable value-added tax regulations. The Company has not accrued any liability for this matter because an unfavorable outcome is not considered probable. The Company estimates the range of reasonably possible losses to be between $1.5 million and $3.5 million.

Virginia Sales and Use Tax Audit

The Company is under audit for sales and use tax related issues by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Company has accrued its current best estimate of the potential outcome within its estimated range of $0.9 million to $2.1 million.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized, together with the income tax benefits recognized, is as follows (in thousands):

Under the terms of its 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan), the Company may issue, among others, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, SSARs, and performance awards, collectively referred to herein as equity instruments. During the periods presented all equity instrument grants were made in the form of RSUs. Other than performance-based RSUs which contain a market-based element, the fair value of RSU grants was determined based on the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of RSUs with market-based vesting features was also measured on the grant date, but was done so using a binomial lattice model.

14

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

Annual grants under the 2006 Plan are generally made to the Company’s key employees during the first quarter of the Company’s fiscal year and to members of the Company’s Board of Directors during the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal year. With the approval of its Chief Executive Officer, the Company also issues equity instruments to strategic new hires and to employees who have demonstrated superior performance. In September 2013, the Company made its annual grant to its key employees consisting of 202,170 Performance Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs). The final number of such PRSUs which will be considered earned by the participants and eventually vest is based on the achievement of a specified Net After Tax Profit (NATP) for the year ending June 30, 2014 and on the average share price of Company stock for the 90 day period ending September 13, 2014 as compared to the average share price for the 90 day period ended September 13, 2013. No PRSUs will be earned if the specified NATP for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014 is not met. If NATP for the year ending June 30, 2014 exceeds the specified NATP and the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ending September 13, 2014 exceeds the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ended September 13, 2013 by 100 percent or more then an additional 202,170 RSUs could be earned by participants. This is the maximum number of additional PRSUs that can be earned related to the September 2013 annual grant. In addition to the performance and market conditions, there is a service vesting condition which stipulates that 50 percent of the earned award will vest on September 1, 2016 and 50 percent of the earned award will vest on September 1, 2017, in both cases dependent upon continuing service by the grantee as an employee of the Company, unless the grantee is eligible for earlier vesting upon retirement, as defined.

The total number of shares authorized by shareholders for grants under the 2006 Plan and its predecessor plan is 12,450,000 as of March 31, 2014. The aggregate number of grants that may be made may exceed this approved amount as forfeited SSARs, stock options, restricted stock and RSUs, and vested but unexercised SSARs and stock options that expire, become available for future grants. As of March 31, 2014, cumulative grants of 13,159,900 equity instruments underlying the shares authorized have been awarded, and 4,066,553 of these instruments have been forfeited.

Activity related to SSARs/non-qualified stock options and RSUs during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 is as follows:

As of March 31, 2014, there was $25.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs scheduled to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.2 years.

ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (ASC 260), requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share on the face of the income statement. Basic earnings per share exclude dilution and are computed by dividing income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock but not securities that are anti-dilutive, including stock options and SSARs with an exercise price greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock. Using the treasury stock method, diluted earnings per share include the incremental effect of SSARs, stock options, restricted shares, and those RSUs that are no longer subject to a market or performance condition. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2013, there were thirty thousand and 0.1 million weighted-average common stock equivalents, respectively, excluded from the diluted per share computation due to their anti-dilutive effects. There were no anti-dilutive common stock equivalents for the three or nine months ended March 31, 2014. The PRSUs granted in September 2013 are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the underlying shares are considered to be contingently issuable shares. These shares will be included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share beginning in the first reporting period in which the performance metric is achieved. The shares underlying the Notes were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 because the average share price was

15

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

above the conversion price during those periods. The Warrants were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 because the Warrants’ exercise price of $68.31 was lower than the average market price of a share of Company common stock during those periods. The Warrants were excluded from the computation of earnings per share during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2013 because the Warrants’ exercise price was above the average market price during those periods. The chart below shows the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. Tax statutes and regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to interpretation and require the application of significant judgment. The Company is currently under examination by two state jurisdictions and one foreign jurisdiction for years ended June 30, 2004 through June 30, 2012. The Company does not expect the resolution of these examinations to have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

The Company’s total liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013 was $9.1 million and $8.2 million, respectively. Of the $9.1 million unrecognized tax benefit at March 31, 2014, $2.2 million, if recognized, would impact the Company’s effective tax rate.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company corrected the classification of $4.2 million of deferred tax liabilities by reclassifying this amount from non-current deferred tax liabilities to a reduction of current deferred tax assets and concluded that this reclassification was not material.

16

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

The Company reports operating results and financial data in two segments: domestic operations and international operations. Domestic operations provide information solutions and services to its customers. Its customers are primarily U.S. federal government agencies. Other customers of the Company’s domestic operations include state and local governments and commercial enterprises. The Company places employees in locations around the world in support of its clients. International operations offer services to both commercial and non-U.S. government customers primarily within the Company’s business systems and enterprise IT markets. The Company does not measure revenue or profit by its major market areas or service offerings, either for internal management or external financial reporting purposes, as it would be impractical to do so. The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on net income attributable to CACI. Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is as follows (in thousands):

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in an orderly transaction. The market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset or liability is known as the principal market. When no principal market exists, the most advantageous market is used. This is the market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the price that maximizes the amount that would be received or minimizes the amount that would be paid. Fair value is based on assumptions market participants would make in pricing the asset or liability. Generally, fair value is based on observable quoted market prices or derived from observable market data when such market prices or data are available. When such prices or inputs are not available, the reporting entity should use valuation models.

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized based on the priority of the inputs used to measure fair value. The inputs used in measuring fair value are categorized into three levels, as follows:

17

Table of Contents

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

The following table summarizes the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013, and the level they fall within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):

Changes in the fair value of the assets held in connection with the Supplemental Savings Plan are recorded in indirect costs and selling expenses.

Contingent consideration at June 30, 2013 related to the requirement that the Company pay contingent consideration in the event Tomorrow Communications, Ltd (TCL), acquired by the Company’s U.K. operations on February 1, 2012, achieved certain specified earnings results during the one year period subsequent to acquisition. The Company determined the fair value of contingent consideration as of the acquisition date using a valuation model which included the evaluation of all possible outcomes and the application of an appropriate discount rate. At the end of each reporting period, the fair value of the contingent consideration was remeasured and any changes were recorded in indirect costs and selling expenses. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, this remeasurement did not result in a significant change to the liability recorded. The maximum contingent consideration associated with the TCL acquisition was approximately $6.0 million. During the year ended June 30, 2013, the Company determined that the maximum contingent consideration possible had been earned. One-half of this amount was paid to the former shareholders of TCL in February 2013 and the other one-half was paid in February 2014.

Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.

On May 1, 2014, when the Notes matured, the Company paid the $300.0 million of principal due, plus accrued semi-annual interest, to the holders of the Notes. At the same time, the Company issued 1.4 million shares of CACI common stock to satisfy the conversion feature of the Notes. Concurrently, the Call Options provided the Company shares of common stock from counterparties equal to the number of shares issued to the holders of the Notes. The settlement of values of the Call Options was based on the daily Volume Weighted Average Price of the Company’s common stock over the 45-day period which commenced on February 24, 2014 and ended on April 28, 2014.

18

Table of Contents

There are statements made herein which do not address historical facts and, therefore, could be interpreted to be forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated include, but are not limited to, the following: the successful integration of our acquisition of Six3 Systems, actual revenue and earnings realized by Six3 Systems, and the performance of the Six3 Systems business; regional and national economic conditions in the United States and globally; terrorist activities or war; changes in interest rates; currency fluctuations; significant fluctuations in the equity markets; changes in our effective tax rate; failure to achieve contract awards in connection with re-competes for present business and/or competition for new business; the risks and uncertainties associated with client interest in and purchases of new products and/or services; continued funding of U.S. government or other public sector projects, based on a change in spending patterns, implementation of spending cuts (sequestration) under the Budget Control Act of 2011 and the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013, changes in budgetary priorities, or in the event of a priority need for funds, such as homeland security; government contract procurement (such as bid protest, small business set asides, loss of work due to organizational conflicts of interest, etc.) and termination risks; the results of government audits and reviews conducted by the Defense Contract Audit Agency, the Defense Contract Management Agency, or other governmental entities with cognizant oversight; individual business decisions of our clients; paradigm shifts in technology; competitive factors such as pricing pressures and/or competition to hire and retain employees (particularly those with security clearances); market speculation regarding our continued independence; material changes in laws or regulations applicable to our businesses, particularly in connection with (i) government contracts for services, (ii) outsourcing of activities that have been performed by the government, and (iii) competition for task orders under Government Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs) and/or schedule contracts with the General Services Administration; the ability to successfully integrate the operations of any future acquisitions; our own ability to achieve the objectives of near term or long range business plans; and other risks described in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

Overview

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is provided to enhance the understanding of, and should be read together with, our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

We derived 93.9 percent and 94.4 percent of our revenue during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, from contracts with U.S. government agencies. These were derived through both prime and subcontractor relationships. We also provide services to state and local governments, commercial customers, and through our international operations, to non-U.S. government agencies. We provide our services and solutions to our clients in the following market areas:

19

Table of Contents

20

Table of Contents

21

Table of Contents

We continue to carefully follow federal budget, legislative and contracting trends and activities and evolve our strategies to take these into consideration. Between October 1 and October 16, 2013, there was no funding of federal agencies and programs either by discretionary funding through annual appropriations acts or interim continuing resolutions (CRs). During that time period, a number of our employees were unable to perform work on their assigned contracts. We estimate the impact of the government shutdown on our fiscal year ending June 30, 2014 results to be $13.0 million of reduced revenue and $5.2 million of reduced operating income.

On March 1, 2013, under the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA), the President ordered sequestration to go into effect. On April 10, 2013, also under the terms of the BCA, the President signed a sequestration order which directs that total discretionary spending for the government’s fiscal year 2014 be reduced by $91 billion. Under sequestration, reductions in both defense and civil agency expenditures went into effect. As part of the agreement to end the October shutdown, congressional leaders agreed to convene a formal House-Senate conference on the government’s FY2014 budget resolution, resulting in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (BBA). On December 26, 2013, the President signed the BBA, revising the amount of discretionary spending to be sequestered for the government’s fiscal years 2014 and 2015, and providing for higher levels of funding in those years than was originally allowed under the BCA. On January 17, 2014, in line with the provisions of the BBA, the President signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014, an omnibus appropriations bill that reduced discretionary spending by $45 billion as opposed to the originally directed amount of $91 billion. Even with the reduced amount of sequestration for the current government fiscal year, we continue to expect the impact of sequestration on contracts and task orders we hold to continue throughout our Fiscal Year 2014 as our customers continue to disclose how they are implementing reductions in expenditures required by the BCA and revised by the BBA.

We are continuously reviewing our operations in an attempt to identify those programs that are at risk from sequestration and other factors so that we can make appropriate contingency plans. We continue to experience reduced funding on some of our programs, and may experience further reductions, but we do not expect the cancellation of any of our major programs. We are also continuing to experience delays in the awarding of contracts on which we have bid. In addition, we are experiencing reductions in Afghanistan-related, low margin material purchases.

We also continue to face some uncertainties due to the current general business environment, and we continue to see a number of protests of major contract awards and delays in government procurement activities. In addition, many of our federal government contracts require us to employ personnel with security clearances, specific levels of education and specific past work experience. Depending on the level of clearance, security clearances can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain and competition for skilled personnel in the information technology services industry is intense. In addition, a shift of expenditures away from programs that we support could cause federal government agencies to reduce their purchases under contracts, to exercise their right to terminate contracts at any time without penalty, or to decide not to exercise options to renew contracts. Additional factors that could affect our federal government contracting business include an increase in set-asides for small businesses and budgetary priorities limiting or delaying federal government spending in general.

22

Table of Contents

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013

Revenue. The table below sets forth revenue by customer type with related percentages of total revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively:

For the three months ended March 31, 2014, total revenue decreased 0.6 percent, or $5.8 million, over the same period a year ago. Six3 Systems, acquired November 15, 2013, generated $104.7 million of revenue during the quarter. Six3 Systems’ revenue is primarily with the DoD. Excluding the Six3 Systems revenue, revenue decreased by 12.2 percent. This decrease in revenue was primarily attributable to delays in planned awards, lower run rates on professional services contracts, and reductions in Afghanistan-related material purchases.

DoD revenue decreased 1.8 percent, or $11.7 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to the same period a year ago, for the reasons described above. DoD revenue includes services provided to the U.S. Army, our largest customer, where our services focus on supporting readiness, tactical military intelligence, and communications systems. DoD revenue also includes work with the U.S. Navy and other DoD agencies across all of our major service offerings.

Revenue from federal civilian agencies increased 1.4 percent, or $2.7 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to the same period a year ago. This increase was attributable to the Six3 Systems acquisition and growth in certain on-going federal civilian agency programs. Federal civilian agency revenue also includes services provided to non-DoD national intelligence agencies.

Commercial and other revenue increased 6.7 percent, or $3.2 million, during the three months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to the same period a year ago. Commercial revenue is derived from both international and domestic operations. International operations accounted for 72.4 percent, or $36.9 million, of total commercial revenue, while domestic operations accounted for 27.6 percent, or $14.0 million.

Revenue from state and local governments increased by 0.7 percent, or thirty thousand dollars, for the three months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to the same period a year ago. Revenue from state and local governments represented less than one percent of our total revenue for both the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

23

Table of Contents

Income from Operations. The following table sets forth the relative percentage that certain items of expense and earnings bore to revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $60.5 million. This was a decrease of $8.1 million, or 11.8 percent, from income from operations of $68.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. This decrease was primarily attributable to federal government budget-related activities, partially offset by cost reduction activities largely implemented in the second half of our fiscal year 2013. Our operating margin was 6.7 percent and 7.6 percent for the periods ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively. This decrease in margin is primarily attributable to the amortization of intangibles acquired in the Six3 Systems acquisition.

As a percentage of revenue, direct costs were 67.3 percent and 68.8 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Direct costs include direct labor and other direct costs (ODCs), which include, among other costs, subcontracted labor and material purchases. ODCs are common in our industry and may vary from period to period. The single largest component of direct costs, direct labor, was $270.4 million and $265.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. ODCs were $335.4 million and $357.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in ODCs was primarily driven by reductions in Afghanistan-related material purchases.

Indirect costs and selling expenses include fringe benefits (attributable to both direct and indirect labor), marketing and bid and proposal costs, indirect labor, and other discretionary expenses. Indirect costs and selling expenses increased by $15.5 million, or 7.7 percent, during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period last year. The increase in total indirect costs and selling expenses is attributable to the acquisition of Six3 Systems, and includes $1.7 million of expense associated with retention bonuses that are part of the agreements we have with certain Six3 Systems executives. In addition, profit bonus expense and stock compensation expense excluding Six3 Systems were $5.7 million higher during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013, as during the third quarter of last year we determined it was probable that our incentive compensation targets would not be achieved. These increases in total indirect costs were partially offset by decreases attributable to cost reduction activities that were largely implemented in the second half of our fiscal year 2013. As a percentage of revenue, indirect costs and selling expenses were 24.0 percent and 22.1 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $17.9 million and $13.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. This increase of $4.2 million was the result of amortization of intangibles acquired in the Six3 Systems acquisition.

24

Table of Contents

Interest expense and other, net increased $5.2 million, or 82.4 percent, during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period a year ago. The increase was primarily attributable to interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing fees, on the additional $845 million of indebtedness incurred in connection with the Six3 Systems acquisition.

The effective tax rate was 36.9 percent and 38.3 percent during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The tax rate reported during the third quarter of both FY2014 and FY2013 was favorably impacted by non-taxable gains on assets invested in corporate owned life insurance (COLI) policies to date. The effective tax rate in the three months ended March 31, 2014 was negatively impacted by non-deductible acquisition related expenses incurred in the acquisition of Six3 Systems.

25

Table of Contents

Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013

Revenue. The table below sets forth revenue by customer type with related percentages of total revenue for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively:

For the nine months ended March 31, 2014, total revenue decreased by 4.0 percent, or $110.2 million, over the same period a year ago. This decrease in revenue is attributable to a decrease in DoD revenue. Six3 Systems generated $153.6 million of revenue from the date of acquisition through March 31, 2014. Six3 Systems’ revenue is primarily with the DoD. Excluding the Six3 Systems revenue, revenue decreased by $263.8 million or 9.5 percent.

DoD revenue decreased 7.3 percent, or $152.3 million, for the nine months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to the same period a year ago. In addition to the factors which impacted our results for the three months ended March 31, 2014, our results for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 were also impacted by the government shutdown which occurred between October 1 and October 16, 2013, which resulted in a reduction of approximately $13.0 million of revenue.

Revenue from federal civilian agencies increased 6.6 percent, or $35.3 million, for the nine months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to the same period a year ago. The increase is attributable to recent acquisitions as well as growth in certain on-going federal civilian agency programs. Federal civilian agency revenue also includes services provided to non-DoD national intelligence agencies.

Commercial and other revenue increased 3.5 percent, or $5.1 million, during the nine months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to the same period a year ago. Commercial revenue is derived from both international and domestic operations. International operations accounted for 71.6 percent, or $107.0 million, of total commercial revenue, while domestic operations accounted for 28.4 percent, or $42.4 million.

Revenue from state and local governments increased by 15.0 percent, or $1.7 million, for the nine months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to the same period a year ago. Revenue from state and local governments represented less than one percent of our total revenue for both the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

26

Table of Contents

Income from Operations. The following table sets forth the relative percentage that certain items of expense and earnings bore to revenue for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Income from operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 was $188.2 million. This is a decrease of $14.8 million, or 7.3 percent, from income from operations of $202.9 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2013. Our operating margin was 7.1 percent down from 7.3 percent during the same period a year ago.

As a percentage of revenue, direct costs were 68.2 percent and 68.9 percent for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Direct costs include direct labor and ODCs. Direct labor was $764.1 million and $766.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. ODCs were $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. This decrease was primarily driven by the October 2013 government shutdown and reductions in Afghanistan-related material purchases and subcontract labor.

Indirect costs and selling expenses include fringe benefits, marketing and bid and proposal costs, indirect labor, and other discretionary expenses and decreased $7.7 million, or 1.2 percent, during the nine month period ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period a year ago. The decrease is primarily attributable to cost reduction activities that were largely implemented in the second half of our fiscal year 2013. As a percentage of revenue, indirect costs and selling expenses were 22.9 percent and 22.3 percent for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Indirect costs and selling expenses in the nine month period ended March 31, 2014, included $11.6 million of expenses associated with the acquisition of Six3 Systems, including a $4.1 million loss on extinguishment associated with the Six3 Systems acquisition indebtedness, and $2.5 million of expense associated with retention bonuses that are part of the agreements we have with certain Six3 Systems executives.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $47.1 million and $40.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. This increase of $6.8 million, or 16.8 percent, was primarily attributable to amortization of intangible assets associated with the Six3 Systems acquisition.

Interest expense and other, net increased $9.0 million, or 46.7 percent, during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period a year ago. The increase was attributable to an increase in interest expense related to higher outstanding debt associated primarily with the Six3 Systems acquisition.

27

Table of Contents

The effective tax rate was 38.0 percent and 37.8 percent during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The tax rate reported for both nine month periods was favorably impacted by non-taxable gains on assets invested in COLI policies during the first nine months of both fiscal years. If gains or losses on those investments throughout the rest of the current fiscal year vary from our estimates, our effective tax rate will fluctuate in the fourth quarter of the year ending June 30, 2014. The effective tax rate in the nine months ended March 31, 2014 was negatively impacted by non-deductible acquisition related expenses incurred in the acquisition of Six3 Systems.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of March 31, 2014, our Credit Facility was a $1.7 billion credit facility, which included an $850.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Facility), and an $831.3 million term loan (the Term Loan). The Credit Facility matures on November 15, 2018.

The Revolving Facility is a secured facility that permits continuously renewable borrowings and has subfacilities of $50.0 million for same-day swing line borrowings and $25.0 million for stand-by letters of credit. As of March 31, 2014, we had $190.0 million outstanding under the Revolving Facility, no borrowings on the swing line and an outstanding letter of credit of $0.4 million.

The Term Loan is a five-year secured facility under which principal payments are due in quarterly installments of $10.4 million through December 31, 2016 and $20.8 million thereafter until the balance is due in full on November 15, 2018. As of March 31, 2014, $831.3 million was outstanding under the Term Loan.

At any time and so long as no default has occurred, we have the right to increase the Term Loan or Revolving Facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to the greater of $400.0 million or an amount subject to 2.75 times secured leverage, calculated assuming the Revolving Facility is fully drawn, with applicable lender approvals.

The interest rates applicable to loans under the Credit Facility are floating interest rates that, at our option, equal a base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin based upon our consolidated total leverage ratio.

The Credit Facility requires us to comply with certain financial covenants, including a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The Credit Facility also includes customary negative covenants restricting or limiting our ability to guarantee or incur additional indebtedness, grant liens or other security interests to third parties, make loans or investments, transfer assets, declare dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock or make other distributions, prepay subordinated indebtedness and engage in mergers, acquisitions or other business combinations, in each case except as expressly permitted under the Credit Facility. Since the inception of the Credit Facility, we have been in compliance with all of the financial covenants. A majority of our assets serve as collateral under the Credit Facility.

The Credit Facility was amended in November 2013 in connection with the Six3 Systems acquisition. Prior to the amendment, the Credit Facility consisted of a $750.0 million revolving credit facility and a $150.0 million term loan and had a maturity date of August 6, 2018.

Effective May 16, 2007, we issued the Notes, which mature on May 1, 2014, in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. The Notes are subordinate to our senior secured debt, and interest on the Notes is payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The Notes are classified as a long-term liability on our balance sheet as of March 31, 2014 as subsequent to March 31, 2014, we repaid the notes using borrowings on the Revolving Facility.

In connection with the issuance of the Notes, we purchased in a private transaction at a cost of $84.4 million call options (the Call Options) to purchase approximately 5.5 million shares of our common stock at a price equal to the conversion price of $54.65 per share. The Call Options allow us to receive shares of our common stock from the counterparties equal to the amount of common stock related to the excess conversion value that we would pay the holders of the Notes upon conversion. In addition, we sold warrants (the Warrants) to issue approximately 5.5 million shares of CACI common stock at an exercise price of $68.31 per share. The proceeds from the sale of the Warrants totaled $56.5 million. On a combined basis, the Call Options and the Warrants are intended to reduce the potential dilution of CACI’s common stock in the event that the Notes are converted by effectively increasing the conversion price of these notes from $54.65 to $68.31. The Call Options and the Warrants are separate and legally distinct instruments that bind us and the counterparties and have no binding effect on the holders of the Notes.

28

Table of Contents

Cash and cash equivalents were $48.4 million and $64.3 million as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was primarily attributable to cash provided by operating activities. Our operating cash flow was $146.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $148.0 million for the same period a year ago. Days-sales outstanding increased to 62 at March 31, 2014, compared to 61 days at March 31, 2013.

We used cash in investing activities of $851.1 million and $121.7 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. This increase in cash used during the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period a year ago was due to the acquisition of Six3 Systems on November 15, 2013.

Cash provided by financing activities was $687.5 million and $14.3 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. During the nine months ended March 31, 2014, we had net borrowings to finance the Six3 Systems acquisition of $696.6 million under our new Credit Facility. During the nine months ended March 31, 2013 we had net borrowings of $138.8 million under our Credit Facility. During the nine months ended March 31, 2013 we used $126.5 million to repurchase 2.2 million shares of our common stock.

Cash flows from financing activities include proceeds received from the exercise of stock options and purchases of stock under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan totaling $2.7 million and $10.7 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

We believe that the combination of internally generated funds, available bank borrowings and cash and cash equivalents on hand will provide the required liquidity and capital resources necessary to fund on-going operations, customary capital expenditures, debt service obligations, and other working capital requirements over the next twelve months. Subsequent to March 31, 2014, we paid the principal and accrued interest due on the Notes with funds available under the Credit Facility. We may in the future seek to borrow additional amounts under a long-term debt security. Over the longer term, our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations necessary to fulfill the obligations under the Credit Facility and any other indebtedness we may incur will depend on our future financial performance which will be affected by many factors outside of our control, including worldwide economic and financial market conditions.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

We use off-balance sheet arrangements to finance the lease of operating facilities. We have financed the use of all of our current office and warehouse facilities through operating leases. Operating leases are also used to finance the use of computers, servers, phone systems, motor vehicles in the U.K., and to a lesser extent, other fixed assets, such as furnishings, that are obtained in connection with business acquisitions. We generally assume the lease rights and obligations of companies acquired in business combinations and continue financing equipment under operating leases until the end of the lease term following the acquisition date. We generally do not finance capital expenditures with operating leases, but instead finance such purchases with available cash balances. For additional information regarding our operating lease commitments, see Note 14 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013. The Credit Facility provides for stand-by letters of credit aggregating up to $25.0 million that reduce the funds available under the Revolving Facility when issued. As of March 31, 2014, we had one outstanding letter of credit of $0.4 million. We have no other material off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

29

Table of Contents

The interest rates on both the Term Loan and the Revolving Facility are affected by changes in market interest rates. We have the ability to manage these fluctuations in part through interest rate hedging alternatives in the form of interest rate swaps. We have entered into floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $400 million related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness. All remaining balances under our Term Loan, and any additional amounts that may be borrowed under our Revolving Facility, are currently subject to interest rate fluctuations. With every one percent fluctuation in the applicable interest rates, interest expense on our variable rate debt for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 would have fluctuated by approximately $5.4 million.

Approximately 4.0 percent and 3.7 percent of our total revenue in the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, was derived from our international operations headquartered in the U.K. Our practice in our international operations is to negotiate contracts in the same currency in which the predominant expenses are incurred, thereby mitigating the exposure to foreign currency exchange fluctuations. It is not possible to accomplish this in all cases; thus, there is some risk that profits will be affected by foreign currency exchange fluctuations. As of March 31, 2014, we held a combination of euros and pounds sterling in the U.K. and in the Netherlands equivalent to approximately $15.6 million. This allows us to better utilize our cash resources on behalf of our foreign subsidiaries, thereby mitigating foreign currency conversion risks.

As of the end of the three month period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. We acquired Six3 Systems on November 15, 2013, and have not yet included Six3 Systems in our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, pursuant to the SEC’s guidance that an assessment of a recently acquired business may be omitted from the scope of an assessment in the year of acquisition, the scope of our assessment of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures does not include Six3 Systems.

The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The effectiveness of a system of disclosure controls and procedures is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitation, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of internal controls, and fraud. Due to such inherent limitations, there can be only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that any system of disclosure controls and procedures will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud, or in making all material information known in a timely manner to appropriate levels of management.

Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level at March 31, 2014.

The Company reports that no changes in its internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

30

Table of Contents

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Al Shimari, et al. v. L-3 Services, Inc. et al.

Reference is made to Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013 for the most recently filed information concerning the suit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The lawsuit names CACI International Inc, CACI Premier Technology, Inc. and former CACI employee Timothy Dugan as Defendants, along with L-3 Services, Inc. Plaintiffs seek, inter alia, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees.

Since the filing of Registrant’s report described above, on March 18, 2014, a three judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held a hearing on Plaintiffs’ appeal and took the matters under advisement.

Abbass, et al v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc. and CACI International Inc, Case No. 1:13CV1186-LMB/JFA (EDVA)

On September 20, 2013, fifty-five Plaintiffs filed a nine-count complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia styled Abbass, et al. v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc., et al. Plaintiffs are Iraqi nationals who assert that their allegations are essentially the same as those of the plaintiffs in Al Shimari. Plaintiffs claim that they suffered significant physical injury and emotional distress while in U.S. custody in Iraq. The lawsuit names CACI International Inc and CACI Premier Technology, Inc. as Defendants. The complaint alleges that Defendants conspired with U.S. military personnel to engage in illegal treatment of Iraqi detainees. The complaint does not allege any interaction between Plaintiffs and any CACI employee. Plaintiffs’ claims are brought pursuant to the Alien Tort Statute and the Torture Victims Protection Act. Plaintiffs seek, inter alia, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees.

Plaintiffs’ action was originally filed in 2009 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, but was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice in September 2011 after the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Saleh v. Titan Corp. and Ibrahim v. Titan Corp., 580 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

The CACI Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. Before deciding the motion to dismiss, the district court stayed the action pending a decision from the Court of Appeals in Al Shimari v. L-3 Services, Inc.

We are vigorously defending the above-described legal proceedings, and, based on our present knowledge of the facts, believe the lawsuits are completely without merit.

Reference is made to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013. There have been no material changes from the risk factors described in that report.

Set forth below are equity securities purchased during the three months ended March 31, 2014 in order to satisfy our obligations under the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan: