CACI INTERNATIONAL INC /DE/ - Annual Report: 2016 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number 001-31400

CACI International Inc

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1100 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA 22201

(Address of principal executive offices)

(703) 841-7800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x.    No  o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  o.    No  x.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x.    No  o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes  x.    No  o.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  o.    No  x.

The aggregate market value of common shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant on December 31, 2015 was $2,215,785,228, based upon the closing price of the registrant’s common shares as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape on such date.

As of August 12, 2016, the registrant had 24,323,446 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III incorporates by reference certain information from the registrant’s proxy statement for its 2016 annual meeting of stockholders. With the exception of the sections of the 2016 Proxy Statement specifically incorporated herein by reference, the 2016 Proxy Statement is not deemed to be filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

INFORMATION RELATING TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain information included or incorporated by reference in this document and in press releases, written statements or other documents filed with the United States (U.S.) Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), or in the Company’s communications and discussions through webcasts, telephone calls and conference calls, may not address historical facts and, therefore, could be interpreted to be “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including projections of financial performance; statements of plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statement concerning developments, performance or industry rankings relating to products or services; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing; and any other statements that address activities, events or developments that CACI intends, expects, projects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future. Forward-looking statements may be characterized by terminology such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “should,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “estimates,” “projects,” “strategy” and similar expressions. These statements are based on assumptions and assessments made by the Company’s management in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors it believes to be appropriate. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that include but are not limited to the factors set forth under Item 1A, Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results, developments and business decisions may differ materially from those envisaged by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company disclaims any duty to update such forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the foregoing.

2

CACI International Inc

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3

PART I

Item 1. Business

Background

CACI International Inc was founded in 1962 as a simulation technology company and has grown into an international information solutions and services provider, providing comprehensive, practical information solutions and services to our customers that build on our expertise in technology across 11 markets.

CACI International Inc was organized in Delaware on October 8, 1985 and is a holding company whose operations are conducted through subsidiaries, which are located in the U.S. and Europe.

With revenue for the year ended June 30, 2016 (FY2016) of $3.7 billion, we serve customers in the U.S. federal government and commercial markets, primarily throughout North America and internationally on behalf of U.S. customers, as well as in the United Kingdom (U.K.) and the Netherlands. As a result of our diverse capabilities and customer mission understanding, many of our customer relationships have existed for over 20 years.

Our proven solutions and services and strong record of program delivery have enabled us to compete for and secure new customers and new contracts, win repeat business, and build and maintain long-term customer relationships. We seek competitive business opportunities and have built our operations to support major programs through a market-focused business development organization.

Our primary customers are agencies and departments of the U.S. government. Our information solutions and services support national security missions and government modernization/transformation for intelligence, defense, and federal civilian customers.  The demand for our solutions and services, in large measure, is created by the increasingly complex network, systems, and information environments in which governments and businesses operate, and by the need to stay current with emerging technology while increasing productivity, enhancing security, and, ultimately, improving performance.

Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “we”, “our”, “the Company” and “CACI” as used in Parts I, II and III include CACI International Inc and its subsidiaries and joint ventures that are more than 50 percent owned or otherwise controlled by it. The term “the registrant” as used in Parts I, II and III refers to CACI International Inc only.

Available Information

Our telephone number is (703) 841-7800 and our Internet page can be accessed at www.caci.com. We make our web site content available for information purposes only. It should not be relied upon for investment purposes, nor is it incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are made available free of charge on our Internet website at www.caci.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Documents filed by us with the SEC can also be viewed at www.sec.gov.

Overview

At June 30, 2016, we had approximately 19,900 employees.

4

Domestic Operations

Our domestic operations account for 100 percent of our U.S. government revenue and 33.9 percent of our commercial revenue. Some of the contracts performed by our domestic operations involve assignment of employees to international locations in support of our federal government customers.  We provide our services and solutions to our domestic customers in the following market areas:

5

6

International Operations

Our international operations are conducted primarily through our operating subsidiaries in Europe, CACI Limited and CACI BV, and account for substantially all revenue generated from international customers and 66.1 percent of our commercial revenue.  Headquartered in London, our international operations provide a diverse mix of IT services and proprietary data and software products, serving commercial and government customers throughout the U.K., continental Europe and around the world.  The organization operates in three addressable markets:  marketing solutions, social services and network services.

Competition

We operate in a highly competitive industry that includes many firms, some of which are larger in size and have greater financial resources than we do. We obtain much of our business on the basis of proposals submitted in response to requests from potential and current customers, who may also receive proposals from other firms. Additionally, we face indirect competition from certain government agencies that perform services for themselves similar to those marketed by us. We know of no single competitor that is dominant in our fields of technology. We have a relatively small share of the available worldwide market for our solutions and services and intend to achieve growth and increase market share both organically and through strategic acquisitions.

Strengths and Strategy

We offer substantially our entire range of solutions and services and proprietary products to defense, intelligence and civilian agencies of the U.S. government. Our work for U.S. government agencies may combine a wide range of skills drawn from our solutions, services and product offerings. We also contract through our international operations to supply solutions, services and/or products to governments of other nations. As with other government contractors, our business is subject to government customer funding decisions and actions that are beyond our control.

Although we are a supplier of proprietary computer-based technology products and marketing systems products, we are not primarily focused on being a software product developer-distributor (see discussion following under “Patents, Trademarks, Trade Secrets and Licenses”).

Our international commercial customer base consists primarily of large enterprises in the U.K.  This market is the primary target of our proprietary marketing systems software, and database products and consultancy services. Commercial bids are frequently negotiated as to terms and conditions for schedule, specifications, delivery and payment.

In order to effectively perform on our existing customer contracts and secure new customer contracts within the U.S. government, we must maintain expert knowledge of agency policies, operations and challenges. We combine this comprehensive knowledge with significant expertise in the design, integration, development and implementation of advanced information solutions and services. This capability provides us with opportunities either to compete directly for, or to support other bidders in competition for multi-million dollar and multi-year award contracts from the U.S. government.

We have strategic business relationships with a number of companies associated with the information technology industry. These strategic partners have business objectives compatible with ours and offer products and services that complement ours. We intend to continue development of these kinds of relationships wherever they support our growth objectives.

Our marketing and new business development is conducted by many of our officers and managers including the Chief Executive Officer, executive officers, vice presidents and division managers. We employ marketing professionals who identify and qualify major contract opportunities, primarily in the federal government market.

Much of our business is won through submission of formal competitive bids. Government and commercial customers typically base their decisions regarding contract awards on their assessment of the quality of past performance, responsiveness to proposal requirements, price, and other factors. The terms, conditions and form of contract of government bids, however, are in most cases specified by the customer. In situations in which the customer-imposed contract type and/or terms appear to expose us to inappropriate risk or do not offer us a sufficient financial return, we may seek alternate arrangements or opt not to bid for the work. Essentially all contracts with the U.S. government, and many contracts with other government entities, permit the government customer to terminate the contract at any time for the convenience of the government or for default by the contractor. Although we operate under the risk that such terminations may occur and have a material impact on operations, such terminations have been rare and, generally, have not materially affected operations.

7

Our contracts and subcontracts are composed of a wide range of contract types, including firm fixed-price, cost reimbursement, time-and-materials (T&M), indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) and government wide acquisition contracts (known as GWACS) such as General Services Administration (GSA) schedule contracts. By company policy, significant fixed-price contracts require the approval of at least two of our senior officers.

At any one time, we may have over two thousand separate active contracts and/or task orders. In FY2016, the top ten revenue-producing contracts, many of which consist of many task orders, accounted for 29.6 percent of our revenue, or $1.1 billion.

In FY2016, 93.5 percent of our revenue came from U.S. government prime contracts or subcontracts consisting of 65.1 percent from DoD contracts and 28.4 percent from U.S. government civilian agency customers.

Industry Trends

The federal government is a large and sophisticated user of information technology. The nation’s expenditures on military, homeland security, and intelligence operations are substantially larger than those of any of its allies or adversaries.

The Budget Control Act of 2011 (the BCA) established limits on discretionary spending, reducing planned defense spending by a minimum of $487 billion over a 10 year period that began at the end of the government’s Fiscal Year 2012.  In addition, the BCA included a sequester mechanism that imposed additional defense cuts of $500 billion, or approximately 9 percent over nine years starting in the government’s Fiscal Year 2013 if the Congress did not identify a means to reduce the U.S. deficit by $1.2 trillion.  Because these means were not identified, the sequester mechanism took effect in March 2013.  

Since the beginning of sequestration in March 2013, there have been three laws enacted that have extended the automatic direct spending reductions beyond the government’s FY2021.  As a result of the agreement to end a shutdown of the U.S. Government in October 2013, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (BBA 2013), signed into law in December 2013, revised the amount of discretionary spending to be sequestered for the government’s FY2014 and FY2015, and included an extension of the sequestration process applied by the BCA to the government’s FY2022 and FY2023.  In February 2014, as part of an act to exempt from the BCA the retirement pay of members and former members of the Armed Forces under the age of 62 before the start of 2014, the sequestration process was extended to the government’s FY2024.  At the end of October 2015, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA 2015) was signed into law, increasing the defense and non-defense discretionary spending caps as enacted by the BCA by $25 billion each in the government’s FY2016 and $15 billion each in the government’s FY2017.  This law further extended the automatic direct spending reductions from the government’s FY2024 through FY2025. If there are no changes to at least the discretionary spending levels set by the BCA for the government’s FY2018, full sequestration of defense and non-defense spending will return on October 1, 2017.

In light of the BCA, the provisions of the BBA 2015, and deficit reduction pressures, discretionary spending by the federal government continues to be constrained and is expected to be so at least through the government’s FY2025.  Even with the reduced amount of sequestration for the government’s Fiscal Year 2016, we experienced the impact of sequestration on contracts and task orders we hold and delays in the awarding of contracts on which we have bid.  We expect this trend to continue into the government’s Fiscal Year 2017, beginning on October 1, 2016.

The sequester mechanism, if left unmodified beyond the government’s Fiscal Year 2017, along with other pressures on government spending, are negatively impacting our business and could have further negative impacts on us in the future.  We may experience disruption of existing programs, delays in contract awards, and other actions, including partial or complete contract terminations.

During our FY2016, we continued to take steps to make sure our cost structure is in line with our expectations of future business opportunities, given the challenging environment for companies in our industry.  We believe we are well positioned to win new business in the market areas we focus on, where the government is expected to continue to spend while constrained by sequestration.

8

We believe that the following trends will impact the federal government’s future spending on the types of services we provide:

We continue to expect to see a steady stream of funding for transformational activities that yield results in a shorter timeframe to maximize investments with more stable and predictable information system outcomes. As the amount of data and information grows, and persistent threats to our national security continue, the demands for applications will grow as well, putting a higher value on faster and more efficient/effective technologies. We expect this demand to result in an increasing need for rapid deployment of cyber solutions, cloud computing, mobile applications, and data analytics. An additional area of cyber emphasis is the security of the supply chain. While technology provides part of the answer, the integration of processes and personnel using forward-looking systems and sound architectures is more likely to provide cost savings and performance efficiencies.

9

Recent Acquisitions

During the past three fiscal years, we completed a total of seven acquisitions, including:

Seasonal Nature of Business

Our business in general is not seasonal, although the summer and holiday seasons affect our revenue because of the impact of holidays and vacations on our labor and on product and service sales by our international operations. Variations in our business also may occur at the expiration of major contracts until such contracts are renewed or new business is obtained.

The U.S. government’s fiscal year ends on September 30 of each year. It is not uncommon for government agencies to award extra tasks or complete other contract actions in the weeks before the end of a fiscal year in order to avoid the loss of unexpended funds. Moreover, in years when the U.S. government does not complete the budget process for the next fiscal year before the end of September, government operations whose appropriations legislation has not been signed into law are funded under a continuing resolution that authorizes them to continue to operate but traditionally does not authorize new spending initiatives.

10

CACI Employment and Benefits

Our employees are our most valuable resource. We are in continuing competition for highly skilled professionals in virtually all of our business areas. The success and growth of our business is significantly correlated with our ability to recruit, train, promote and retain high quality people at all levels of the organization. For these reasons, we endeavor to maintain competitive salary structures, incentive compensation programs, fringe benefits, opportunities for growth, and individual recognition and award programs. Fringe benefits are generally consistent across our subsidiaries, and include paid vacations, sick leave and holidays; medical, dental, disability and life insurance; tuition reimbursement for job-related education and training; and other benefits under various retirement savings and stock purchase plans.  

We have published policies that set high standards for the conduct of our business. We require all of our employees, independent contractors working on customer engagements, officers, and directors annually to execute and affirm to the code of ethics applicable to their activities. In addition, we require annual ethics and compliance training for all of our employees to provide them with the knowledge necessary to maintain our high standards of ethics and compliance.

Patents, Trademarks, Trade Secrets and Licenses

Generally, our solutions and services are not substantially dependent upon obtaining or maintaining intellectual property protections, although our operations make use of such protections and benefit from them as discriminators in competition. We own a limited number of patents and claim copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights in a variety of intellectual property, including each of our proprietary computer software and data products and the related documentation. We also maintain a number of trade secrets that contribute to our success and competitive distinction and endeavor to accord such trade secrets protection adequate to ensure their continuing availability to us.

Our proprietary information is protected through a combination of contractual arrangements with our employees and third parties and intellectual property laws. From time to time, we are required to assert our rights against former employees or other third parties who attempt to misappropriate our proprietary and confidential information. Although we are not materially dependent on the protection of our intellectual property, we take such matters seriously and pursue claims against such individuals to the extent necessary to adequately protect our rights.

As a systems integrator, it is important that we maintain access to software, data and other products supplied by third parties and we continue to enter into agreements that give us the right to distribute and receive income from third party software, data and other products that serve our customers. The durations of such agreements are negotiated and vary according to the terms of the agreements.

Backlog

During the fourth quarter of FY2016, in conjunction with preparing for the new accounting standard ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, we have reviewed our backlog processes and definitions, and reviewed both our funded and unfunded backlog balances. As part of that review, we have reduced our backlog associated with a number of programs and changed our reporting process going forward.  In a number of cases, we received awards or funding, but due to changes in government priorities and programs, we never realized the full value of those awards, and the period of performance for them had lapsed.  Given the low likelihood of us realizing revenue in these instances, we decreased our unfunded backlog by $2.1 billion and funded backlog by $400.0 million.  At the end of June, our total backlog inclusive of these one-time adjustments was $11.0 billion, and our funded backlog was $2.3 billion, inclusive of these adjustments.  Total backlog increased by $1.4 billion, a 14.7 percent increase from June 30, 2015 of $9.6 billion. We presently anticipate, based on current revenue projections, that the majority of the funded backlog as of June 30, 2016 will result in revenue during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017.  

Our backlog represents the aggregate contract revenue we have the potential to earn over the remaining life of our contracts. Funded backlog is based upon amounts appropriated by a customer for payment for goods and services and as the U.S. government operates under annual appropriations, agencies of the U.S. government generally fund contracts on an incremental basis. As a result, the majority of our estimated remaining contract value is not funded backlog. The process used to compile remaining contract values are based on the underlying contract documents. There is no assurance that all funded or potential contract value will result in realized revenue.  Funded and unfunded backlog is subject to change from execution of new contracts, contract modifications or extensions, associated purchase orders not being placed, government deobligations, contract completions as periods of performance expire, or early terminations.

11

Business Segments, Foreign Operations, and Major Customers

Additional business segment, foreign operations and major customer information is provided in our Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report. In particular, see Note 16, Business Segment, Customer and Geographic Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Revenue by Contract Type

The following information is provided on the amounts of our revenue attributable to cost reimbursable, firm fixed-price (including proprietary software product sales) and time and materials (T&M) contracts during each of the last three fiscal years:

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with the information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents we file with the SEC. The risks and uncertainties described below are those that we have identified as material, but are not the only risks and uncertainties facing us. Our business is also subject to general risks and uncertainties that affect many other companies, such as overall U.S. and non-U.S. economic and industry conditions including a global economic slowdown, geopolitical events, changes in laws or accounting rules, fluctuations in interest and exchange rates, terrorism, international conflicts, major health concerns, natural disasters or other disruptions of expected economic and business conditions. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may impair our business operations and liquidity.  

We depend on contracts with the federal government for substantially all of our revenue.  If the government significantly decreased or ceased doing business with us, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results would be materially and adversely affected.

The federal government is our primary customer, with revenue from federal government contracts, either as a prime contractor or a subcontractor, accounting for 93.5 percent of our total revenue in FY2016 and 93.7 percent of our total revenue in FY2015. Specifically, we generated 65.1 percent of our total revenue in FY2016 and 66.9 percent of our total revenue in FY2015 from contracts with agencies of the DoD. We expect that federal government contracts will continue to be the primary source of our revenue for the foreseeable future. If we were suspended or debarred from contracting with the federal government or any significant agency in the intelligence community or the DoD, if our reputation or relationship with government agencies were to be impaired, or if the government otherwise ceased doing business with us or significantly decreased the amount of business it does with us, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results would be materially and adversely affected.

Our business could be adversely affected by delays caused by our competitors protesting major contract awards received by us, resulting in the delay of the initiation of work.  

The number of bid protests of contract awards by unsuccessful bidders is increasing and the U.S. government is taking longer to resolve such protests. Bid protests may result in an increase in expenses related to obtaining contract awards or an unfavorable modification or loss of an award. In the event a bid protest is unsuccessful, the resulting delay in the startup and funding of the work under these contracts may cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our business could be adversely affected by changes in budgetary priorities of the federal government.

Because we derive substantially all of our revenue from contracts with the federal government, we believe that the success and development of our business will continue to depend on our successful participation in federal government contract programs. Changes in federal government budgetary priorities could directly affect our financial performance. A significant decline in government expenditures, a shift of expenditures away from programs that we support or a change in federal government contracting policies could cause federal government agencies to reduce their purchases under contracts, to exercise their right to terminate contracts at any time without penalty or not to exercise options to renew contracts.

12

Subsequent to the enactment of the BCA in 2011, the Congress and the Administration were unable to reach agreement on budget reduction measures required by the legislation.  The BCA required total projected defense spending to decline by $487 billion from the government’s fiscal year 2012 through 2021.  It also included a sequester mechanism that imposed additional defense cuts of $500 billion over nine years starting in the government’s fiscal year 2013 if the Congress did not identify a means to reduce the U.S. deficit by $1.2 trillion.  The effects of sequestration have been mitigated by two pieces of legislation:  the BBA of 2013, signed into law in late December of 2013, revising the amount of discretionary spending to be reduced for the government’s fiscal years 2014 and 2015 as originally allowed under the BCA followed by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA 2015), signed into law at the end of October 2015, increasing the defense and non-defense FY2016 and FY2017 discretionary spending caps.  This law further extended the automatic direct spending reductions to the government’s FY2025.  If there are no changes to at least the discretionary spending levels set by the BCA for the government’s FY2018, full sequestration of defense and non-defense spending will return on October 1, 2017.

In light of the BCA, the provisions of the BBA 2015, and deficit reduction pressures, discretionary spending by the federal government continues to be constrained and is expected to be so at least through the government’s FY2025.  The sequester mechanism, if left unmodified beyond the government’s fiscal year 2017, along with other pressures on government spending, could negatively impact our business and could have further negative impacts on us in the future.  We may experience disruption of existing programs, delays in contract awards, and other actions, including partial or complete contract terminations.

In years when Congress does not complete its budget process before the end of its fiscal year (September 30), government operations are funded through a continuing resolution (CR) that temporarily funds federal agencies.  Recent CRs have generally provided funding at the levels provided in the previous fiscal year and have not authorized new spending initiatives. When the federal government operates under a CR, delays can occur in the procurement of products and services. Historically, such delays have not had a material effect on our business; however, should funding of the federal government continue to be provided through CRs during its fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2016 and extended through the entire government 2017 fiscal year, and sequestration continues as part of the implementation of the BCA, it could have significant consequences to our business and our industry.  If Congress cannot complete its budget process or does not pass a CR by the end of September, a shutdown of the federal government will result on October 1, 2016, as happened in October 2013.  Were a shutdown to occur, it could result in our incurring substantial labor or other costs without being reimbursed under our contracts or the delaying or cancelling of certain programs.  This could also have an adverse effect on our business and our industry.

At times, we may continue to work without funding, and use our funds in order to meet our customer’s desired delivery dates for products or services. It is uncertain at this time which of our programs’ funding could be reduced in future years or whether new legislation will be passed by Congress in the next fiscal year that could result in additional or alternative funding cuts.

Additionally, our business could be affected if we experience an increase in set-asides for small businesses which could result in our inability to compete directly for prime contracts.

Our federal government contracts may be terminated by the government at any time and may contain other provisions permitting the government not to continue with contract performance, and if lost contracts are not replaced, our operating results may differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

We derive substantially all of our revenue from federal government contracts that typically span one or more base years and one or more option years. The option periods typically cover more than half of the contract’s potential duration. Federal government agencies generally have the right not to exercise these option periods. In addition, our contracts typically also contain provisions permitting a government customer to terminate the contract for its convenience. A decision not to exercise option periods or to terminate contracts for convenience could result in significant revenue shortfalls from those anticipated.

Federal government contracts contain numerous provisions that are unfavorable to us.

Federal government contracts contain provisions and are subject to laws and regulations that give the government rights and remedies, some of which are not typically found in commercial contracts, including allowing the government to:

13

If the government terminates a contract for convenience, we may recover only our incurred or committed costs, settlement expenses and profit on work completed prior to the termination. If the government terminates a contract for default, we may be unable to recover even those amounts and instead may be liable for excess costs incurred by the government in procuring undelivered items and services from another source. Depending on the value of a contract, such termination could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. Certain contracts also contain organizational conflict of interest (OCI) clauses that limit our ability to compete for or perform certain other contracts. OCIs arise any time we engage in activities that (i) make us unable or potentially unable to render impartial assistance or advice to the government; (ii) impair or might impair our objectivity in performing contract work; or (iii) provide us with an unfair competitive advantage. For example, when we work on the design of a particular system, we may be precluded from competing for the contract to develop and install that system. Depending upon the value of the matters affected, an OCI issue that precludes our participation in or performance of a program or contract could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

As is common with government contractors, we have experienced and continue to experience occasional performance issues under certain of our contracts. Depending upon the value of the matters affected, a performance problem that impacts our performance of a program or contract could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

If we fail to establish and maintain important relationships with government entities and agencies, our ability to successfully bid for new business may be adversely affected.

To facilitate our ability to prepare bids for new business, we rely in part on establishing and maintaining relationships with officials of various government entities and agencies. These relationships enable us to provide informal input and advice to government entities and agencies prior to the development of a formal bid. We may be unable to successfully maintain our relationships with government entities and agencies, and any failure to do so may adversely affect our ability to bid successfully for new business and could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.  

We derive significant revenue from contracts and task orders awarded through a competitive bidding process. If we are unable to consistently win new awards over any extended period, our business and prospects will be adversely affected.

Our contracts and task orders with the federal government are typically awarded through a competitive bidding process. We expect that much of the business that we will seek in the foreseeable future will continue to be awarded through competitive bidding. Budgetary pressures and changes in the procurement process have caused many government customers to increasingly purchase goods and services through IDIQ contracts, GSA schedule contracts and other government-wide acquisition contracts. These contracts, some of which are awarded to multiple contractors, have increased competition and pricing pressure, requiring that we make sustained post-award efforts to realize revenue under each such contract. In addition, in consideration of the practice of agencies awarding work under such contracts that is arguably outside the intended scope of the contracts, both the GSA and the DoD have initiated programs aimed to ensure that all work fits properly within the scope of the contract under which it is awarded. The net effect of such programs may reduce the number of bidding opportunities available to us. Moreover, even if we are highly qualified to work on a particular new contract, we might not be awarded business because of the federal government’s policy and practice of maintaining a diverse contracting base.

This competitive bidding process presents a number of risks, including the following:

If we are unable to win particular contracts, we may be prevented from providing to customers services that are purchased under those contracts for a number of years. If we are unable to consistently win new contract awards over any extended period, our business and prospects will be adversely affected and that could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. In addition, upon the expiration of a contract, if the customer requires further services of the type provided by the contract, there is frequently a competitive rebidding process. There can be no assurance that we will win any particular bid, or that we will be able to replace business lost upon expiration or completion of a contract, and the termination or non-renewal of any of our significant contracts could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

14

Our business may suffer if we or our employees are unable to obtain the security clearances or other qualifications we and they need to perform services for our customers.

Many of our federal government contracts require us to have security clearances and employ personnel with specified levels of education, work experience and security clearances. Depending on the level of clearance, security clearances can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain. If we or our employees lose or are unable to obtain necessary security clearances, we may not be able to win new business and our existing customers could terminate their contracts with us or decide not to renew them. To the extent we cannot obtain or maintain the required security clearances for our employees working on a particular contract, we may not derive the revenue anticipated from the contract which could cause our results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.  

We must comply with a variety of laws and regulations, and our failure to comply could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.

We must observe laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of federal government contracts which affect how we do business with our customers and may impose added costs on our business. For example, the Federal Acquisition Regulation and the industrial security regulations of the DoD and related laws include provisions that:

Our failure to comply with these or other laws and regulations could result in contract termination, loss of security clearances, suspension or debarment from contracting with the federal government, civil fines and damages and criminal prosecution and penalties, any of which could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

The federal government may change its procurement or other practices in a manner adverse to us.

The federal government may change its procurement practices, or adopt new contracting rules and regulations, such as those related to cost accounting standards. It could also adopt new contracting methods relating to GSA contracts or other government-wide contracts, adopt new socio-economic requirements, or change the basis upon which it reimburses our compensation and other expenses or otherwise limit such reimbursements. In all such cases, there is uncertainty surrounding the changes and what actual impacts they may have on contractors.  These changes could impair our ability to obtain new contracts or win re-competed contracts or adversely affect our future profit margin. Any new contracting methods could be costly or administratively difficult for us to satisfy and, as a result, could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Restrictions on or other changes to the federal government’s use of service contracts may harm our operating results.

We derive a significant amount of revenue from service contracts with the federal government. The government may face restrictions from new legislation, regulations or government union pressures, on the nature and amount of services the government may obtain from private contractors (i.e., insourcing versus outsourcing). Any reduction in the government’s use of private contractors to provide federal services could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our contracts and administrative processes and systems are subject to audits and cost adjustments by the federal government, which could reduce our revenue, disrupt our business, or otherwise adversely affect our results of operations.

Federal government agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), routinely audit and investigate government contracts and government contractors’ administrative processes and systems. These agencies review our performance on contracts, pricing practices, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards. They also evaluate the adequacy of internal controls over our business systems, including our purchasing, accounting, estimating, earned value management, and government property systems. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to a specific contract will not be reimbursed, and any such costs already reimbursed must be refunded and certain penalties may be imposed. Moreover, if any of the administrative processes and systems are found not to comply with requirements, we may be subjected to increased government scrutiny and approval that could delay or otherwise adversely affect our ability to compete for or perform contracts or collect our revenue in a timely manner. Therefore, an unfavorable outcome of an audit by the DCAA or another government agency could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. If a government investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including

15

termination of contracts, forfeitures of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspension or debarment from doing business with the federal government. In addition, we could suffer serious reputational harm if allegations of impropriety were made against us. Each of these results could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. DCAA audits for costs incurred on the majority of work performed after June 30, 2009 have not yet been completed. We have received notifications from DCAA on some smaller portions of our business they consider to be low risk, which will likely result in our proposed rates for those portions for periods subsequent to June 30, 2009 being accepted without adjustments.  In addition, DCAA audits for costs incurred by our recent acquisitions for certain periods prior to acquisition have not yet been completed.  We do not know the outcome of any existing or future audits and if any future audit adjustments significantly exceed our estimates, our profitability could be adversely affected. 

Failure to maintain strong relationships with other contractors could result in a decline in our revenue.

We derive substantial revenue from contracts in which we act as a subcontractor or from teaming arrangements in which we and other contractors bid on particular contracts or programs. As a subcontractor or teammate, we often lack control over fulfillment of a contract, and poor performance on the contract could impact our customer relationship, even when we perform as required. We expect to continue to depend on relationships with other contractors for a portion of our revenue in the foreseeable future. Moreover, our revenue and operating results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated if any prime contractor or teammate chose to offer directly to the customer services of the type that we provide or if they team with other companies to provide those services.

We may not receive the full amounts authorized under the contracts included in our backlog, which could reduce our revenue in future periods below the levels anticipated.

Our backlog consists of funded backlog, which is based on amounts actually committed by a customer for payment for goods and services, and unfunded backlog, which is based upon contract revenue we have the potential to earn over the remaining life of the contracts. Our backlog may not result in actual revenue in any particular period, or at all, which could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

The maximum contract value specified under a government contract or task order awarded to us is not necessarily indicative of the revenue that we will realize under that contract. For example, we derive a substantial portion of our revenue from government contracts in which we are not the sole provider, meaning that the government could turn to other companies to fulfill the contract. We also derive revenue from IDIQ contracts, which do not require the government to purchase a pre-determined amount of goods or services under the contract. Action by the government to obtain support from other contractors or failure of the government to order the quantity of work anticipated could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.  

Without additional Congressional appropriations, some of the contracts included in our backlog will remain unfunded, which could materially and adversely affect our future operating results.

Although many of our federal government contracts include multi-year performance periods, Congress often appropriates funds for these contracts on an annual basis. As a result, a majority our contracts are only partially funded at any point during their term and unfunded contract work is subject to future appropriations by Congress. As a result of a lack of appropriated funds or efforts to reduce federal government spending, the receipt of revenues included in our backlog may never occur or may be delayed. We calculate our unfunded backlog based on the aggregate contract revenue we have the potential to realize.  On unfunded contract work, including amounts based on the assumed exercise of options under such contracts. If our backlog is inaccurate and we fail to realize those amounts as revenue, our future operating results could be materially and adversely affected.  

Employee misconduct, including security breaches, could result in the loss of customers and our suspension or debarment from contracting with the federal government.

We may be unable to prevent our employees from engaging in misconduct, fraud or other improper activities that could adversely affect our business and reputation. Misconduct could include the failure to comply with federal government procurement regulations, regulations regarding the protection of classified information and legislation regarding the pricing of labor and other costs in government contracts. Many of the systems we develop involve managing and protecting information involved in national security and other sensitive government functions. A security breach in one of these systems could prevent us from having access to such critically sensitive systems. Other examples of employee misconduct could include time card fraud and violations of the Anti-Kickback Act. The precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective, and we could face unknown risks or losses. As a result of employee misconduct, we could face fines and penalties, loss of security clearance and suspension or debarment from contracting with the federal government, which could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

16

Our failure to attract and retain qualified employees, including our senior management team, could adversely affect our business.

Our continued success depends to a substantial degree on our ability to recruit and retain the technically skilled personnel we need to serve our customers effectively. Our business involves the development of tailored solutions for our customers, a process that relies heavily upon the expertise and services of our employees. Accordingly, our employees are our most valuable resource. Competition for skilled personnel in the information technology services industry is intense, and technology service companies often experience high attrition among their skilled employees. There is a shortage of people capable of filling these positions and they are likely to remain a limited resource for the foreseeable future. Recruiting and training these personnel require substantial resources. Our failure to attract and retain technical personnel could increase our costs of performing our contractual obligations, reduce our ability to efficiently satisfy our customers’ needs, limit our ability to win new business and cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

In addition to attracting and retaining qualified technical personnel, we believe that our success will depend on the continued employment of our senior management team and its ability to generate new business and execute projects successfully. Our senior management team is very important to our business because personal reputations and individual business relationships are a critical element of obtaining and maintaining customer engagements in our industry, particularly with agencies performing classified operations. The loss of any of our senior executives could cause us to lose customer relationships or new business opportunities, which could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our markets are highly competitive, and many of the companies we compete against have substantially greater resources.

The markets in which we operate include a large number of participants and are highly competitive. Many of our competitors may compete more effectively than we can because they are larger, better financed and better known companies than we are. In order to stay competitive in our industry, we must also keep pace with changing technologies and customer preferences. If we are unable to differentiate our services from those of our competitors, our revenue may decline. In addition, our competitors have established relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase their ability to address customer needs. As a result, new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and compete more effectively than we can. There is also a significant industry trend towards consolidation, which may result in the emergence of companies which are better able to compete against us. The results of these competitive pressures could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our quarterly revenue and operating results could be volatile due to the unpredictability of the federal government’s budgeting process and policy priorities.

Our quarterly revenue and operating results may fluctuate significantly and unpredictably in the future. In particular, if the federal government does not adopt, or delays adoption of, a budget for each fiscal year beginning on October 1, or fails to pass a continuing resolution, federal agencies may be forced to suspend our contracts and delay the award of new and follow-on contracts and orders due to a lack of funding. Further, the rate at which the federal government procures technology may be negatively affected following changes in presidential administrations and senior government officials. Therefore, period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be a good indication of our future performance.  

Our quarterly operating results may not meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors, which in turn may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.  

We may lose money or generate less than anticipated profits if we do not accurately estimate the cost of an engagement which is conducted on a fixed-price basis.

We perform a portion of our engagements on a variety of fixed-price contract vehicles. We derived 33.3 percent of our total revenue in FY2016 and 35.6 percent of our total revenue in FY2015 from fixed-price contracts. Fixed-price contracts require us to price our contracts by predicting our expenditures in advance. In addition, some of our engagements obligate us to provide ongoing maintenance and other supporting or ancillary services on a fixed-price basis or with limitations on our ability to increase prices. Many of our engagements are also on a T&M basis. While these types of contracts are generally subject to less uncertainty than fixed-price contracts, to the extent that our actual labor costs are higher than the contract rates, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

17

When making proposals for engagements on a fixed-price basis, we rely on our estimates of costs and timing for completing the projects. These estimates reflect our best judgment regarding our capability to complete the task efficiently. Any increased or unexpected costs or unanticipated delays in connection with the performance of fixed-price contracts, including delays caused by factors outside our control, could make these contracts less profitable or unprofitable. From time to time, unexpected costs and unanticipated delays have caused us to incur losses on fixed-price contracts, primarily in connection with state government customers. On rare occasions, these losses have been significant. In the event that we encounter such problems in the future, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our earnings and margins may vary based on the mix of our contracts and programs.

At June 30, 2016, our backlog included cost reimbursable, T&M and fixed-price contracts. Cost reimbursable and T&M contracts generally have lower profit margins than fixed-price contracts. Our earnings and margins may vary materially and adversely depending on the types of long-term government contracts undertaken, the costs incurred in their performance, the achievement of other performance objectives and the stage of performance at which the right to receive fees, particularly under incentive and award fee contracts, is finally determined.

Systems failures may disrupt our business and have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Any systems failures, including network, software or hardware failures, whether caused by us, a third party service provider, unauthorized intruders and hackers, computer viruses, natural disasters, power shortages or terrorist attacks, could cause loss of data or interruptions or delays in our business or that of our customers. Like other global companies, we have experienced cyber security threats to our data and systems, our company sensitive information, and our information technology infrastructure, including malware and computer virus attacks, unauthorized access, systems failures and temporary disruptions.  Prior cyber attacks directed at us have not had a material adverse impact on our business or our financial results, and we believe that our continuing commitment toward threat detection and mitigation processes and procedures will avoid such impact in the future.  Due to the evolving nature of these security threats, however, the impact of any future incident cannot be predicted. In addition, the failure or disruption of our mail, communications or utilities could cause us to interrupt or suspend our operations or otherwise harm our business. Our property and business interruption insurance may be inadequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur as a result of any system or operational failure or disruption and, as a result, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

The systems and networks that we maintain for our customers, although highly redundant in their design, could also fail. If a system or network we maintain were to fail or experience service interruptions, we might experience loss of revenue or face claims for damages or contract termination. Our errors and omissions liability insurance may be inadequate to compensate us for all the damages that we might incur and, as a result, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.  

Customer systems failures could damage our reputation and adversely affect our results of operations.

Many of the systems that we develop, integrate, maintain, otherwise support or use involve managing and protecting intelligence, national security, and other sensitive government information. While we have programs designed to protect such information and comply with all relevant privacy and security requirements, the threats that our clients face have grown more frequent and sophisticated. A security breach or system failure in a system that we develop, integrate, maintain or otherwise support could result in a loss of revenue, remediation costs, claims for damages or contract termination and our errors and omissions liability insurance may be inadequate to compensate us for all the damages that we might incur. Any such event could also cause serious damage to our reputation and prevent us from having access to or being eligible for further work on such sensitive systems for U.S. government customers.

In addition, in order to provide services to our customers, we often depend upon or use customer systems that are supported by the customer or third parties.  Any security breach or system failure in such systems could result in an interruption of our customer’s operations, significant delays under a contract, and a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

18

We may have difficulty identifying and executing acquisitions on favorable terms and therefore may grow at slower than anticipated rates.

One of our key growth strategies has been to selectively pursue acquisitions. Through acquisitions, we have expanded our base of federal government customers, increased the range of solutions we offer to our customers and deepened our penetration of existing markets and customers. We may encounter difficulty identifying and executing suitable acquisitions. To the extent that management is involved in identifying acquisition opportunities or integrating new acquisitions into our business, our management may be diverted from operating our core business. Without acquisitions, we may not grow as rapidly as the market expects, which could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. We may encounter other risks in executing our acquisition strategy, including:

Each of these types of risks could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

We may have difficulty integrating the operations of any companies we acquire, which could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

The success of our acquisition strategy will depend upon our ability to continue to successfully integrate any businesses we may acquire in the future. The integration of these businesses into our operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties, absorb significant management attention and require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development of our business. These integration difficulties include the integration of personnel with disparate business backgrounds, the transition to new information systems, coordination of geographically dispersed organizations, loss of key employees of acquired companies, and reconciliation of different corporate cultures. For these or other reasons, we may be unable to retain key customers of acquired companies. Moreover, any acquired business may fail to generate the revenue or net income we expected or produce the efficiencies or cost-savings we anticipated. Any of these outcomes could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

If our subcontractors fail to perform their contractual obligations, our performance as a prime contractor and our ability to obtain future business could be materially and adversely impacted and our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our performance of government contracts may involve the issuance of subcontracts to other companies upon which we rely to perform all or a portion of the work we are obligated to deliver to our customers. A failure by one or more of our subcontractors to satisfactorily deliver on a timely basis the agreed-upon supplies, perform the agreed-upon services, or appropriately manage their vendors may materially and adversely impact our ability to perform our obligations as a prime contractor.  

A subcontractor’s performance deficiency could result in the government terminating our contract for default. A default termination could expose us to liability for excess costs of reprocurement by the government and have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete for future contracts and task orders. Depending upon the level of problem experienced, such problems with subcontractors could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

19

The federal government’s appropriation process and other factors may delay the collection of our receivables, and our business may be adversely affected if we cannot collect our receivables in a timely manner.

We depend on the collection of our receivables to generate cash flow, provide working capital, pay debt and continue our business operations. If the federal government, any of our other customers or any prime contractor for whom we are a subcontractor fails to pay or delays the payment of their outstanding invoices for any reason, our business and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. The government may fail to pay outstanding invoices for a number of reasons, including lack of appropriated funds or lack of an approved budget. In addition, the DCAA may revoke our direct billing privileges, which would adversely affect our ability to collect our receivables in a timely manner. Contracting officers have the authority to impose contractual withholdings, which can also adversely affect our ability to collect timely. The Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations require DoD contracting officers to impose contractual withholdings at no less than certain minimum levels if a contracting officer determines that one or more of a contractor’s business systems have one or more significant deficiencies. Some prime contractors for whom we are a subcontractor have significantly less financial resources than we do, which may increase the risk that we may not be paid in full or payment may be delayed. If we experience difficulties collecting receivables, it could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.  

We have substantial investments in recorded goodwill as a result of prior acquisitions, and changes in future business conditions could cause these investments to become impaired, requiring substantial write-downs that would reduce our operating income.

Goodwill accounts for $2.6 billion of our recorded total assets. We evaluate the recoverability of recorded goodwill amounts annually or when evidence of potential impairment exists. The annual impairment test is based on several factors requiring judgment. Principally, a decrease in expected reporting unit cash flows or changes in market conditions may indicate potential impairment of recorded goodwill. If there is an impairment, we would be required to write down the recorded amount of goodwill, which would be reflected as a charge against operating income.  

Our operations involve several risks and hazards, including potential dangers to our employees and to third parties that are inherent in aspects of our federal business (i.e., counterterrorism training services). If these risks and hazards are not adequately insured, it could adversely affect our operating results.

Our federal business includes the maintenance of global networks and the provision of special operations services (i.e., counterterrorism training) that require us to dispatch employees to various countries around the world. These countries may be experiencing political upheaval or unrest, and in some cases war or terrorism. It is possible that certain of our employees or executives will suffer injury or bodily harm, or be killed or kidnapped in the course of these deployments. We could also encounter unexpected costs for reasons beyond our control in connection with the repatriation of our employees or executives. Any of these types of accidents or other incidents could involve significant potential claims of employees, executives and/or third parties who are injured or killed or who may have wrongful death or similar claims against us.

We maintain insurance policies that mitigate against risk and potential liabilities related to our operations. This insurance is maintained in amounts that we believe are reasonable. However, our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover those claims or liabilities, and we may be forced to bear significant costs from an accident or incident. Substantial claims in excess of our related insurance coverage could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.  

Our failure to adequately protect our confidential information and proprietary rights may harm our competitive position.

Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to protect our proprietary information. Although our employees are subject to confidentiality obligations, this protection may be inadequate to deter misappropriation of our proprietary information. In addition, we may be unable to detect unauthorized use of our proprietary information in order to take appropriate steps to enforce our rights. If we are unable to prevent third parties from infringing or misappropriating our proprietary information, our competitive position could be harmed and our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

We face additional risks which could harm our business because we have international operations.

We conduct the majority of our international operations in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Our international operations comprised 4.0 percent of our revenue in FY2016 and 4.4 percent of our revenue in FY2015. Our international operations are subject to risks associated with operating in a foreign country. These risks include fluctuations in the value of the British pound and the Euro, longer payment cycles, changes in foreign tax laws and regulations and unexpected legislative, regulatory, economic or political changes.  These risks are increased by the uncertainty caused by the U.K. vote to leave the European Union (Brexit).

20

Approximately 73.0 percent of the revenue generated by our international operations are also subject to risks associated with operating a commercial as opposed to a government contracting business, including the effects of general economic conditions in Europe on the telecommunications, computer software and computer services sectors and the impact of more concentrated and intense competition for the reduced volume of work available in those sectors. We are marketing our services to customers in industries that are new to us and our efforts in that regard may be unsuccessful. Other factors that may adversely affect our international operations are difficulties relating to managing our business internationally, integrating recent acquisitions, multiple tax structures and adverse changes in foreign exchange rates. Any of these factors could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.  

Our senior secured credit facility (the Credit Facility) imposes certain restrictions on our ability to take certain actions which may have an impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.

The Credit Facility imposes certain operating and financial restrictions on us and requires us to meet certain financial tests. These restrictions may significantly limit or prohibit us from engaging in certain transactions, including the following:

The failure to comply with any of these covenants would cause a default under the Credit Facility. A default, if not waived, could cause our debt to become immediately due and payable. In such situations, we may not be able to repay our debt or borrow sufficient funds to refinance it, and even if new financing is available, it may not contain terms that are acceptable to us.

Despite our outstanding debt, we may incur additional indebtedness.

The Credit Facility consists of an $850.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Facility) and a $1,131.3 million term loan facility (the Term Loan).  The Revolving Facility has subfacilities of $100.0 million for same-day swing line loan borrowings and $25.0 million for stand-by letters of credit.  The Credit Facility was amended during the third quarter of FY2016 in connection with the Company’s acquisition of NSS (see Note 4).  CACI financed the transaction by borrowing $250.0 million under its existing Revolving Facility and by entering into an eighth amendment and first incremental facility amendment to its Credit Facility to allow for the incurrence of $300.0 million in additional Term Loans.  At any time and so long as no default has occurred, the Company has the right to increase the Revolving Facility or the Term Loan in an aggregate principal amount of up to the greater of $400.0 million or an amount subject to 2.75 times senior secured leverage, calculated assuming the revolving Facility is fully drawn, with applicable lender approvals.  At June 30, 2016, $440.0 million was outstanding under the revolving credit facility and $1,032.8 million was outstanding under the term loan.  In addition, the terms of the Credit Facility allow us to incur additional indebtedness from other sources so long as we satisfy the covenants in the agreement governing the Credit Facility.  If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the risks related to our ability to service that debt could increase.

Servicing our debt requires a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our substantial debt.

The Credit Facility matures on June 1, 2020.  Principal payments under the term loan are due in quarterly installments.  Our business may not generate cash flow from operations sufficient to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring debt or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive.

A change in control or fundamental change may adversely affect us.

The Credit Facility provides that certain change in control events with respect to us will constitute a default.

21

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

As of June 30, 2016, we leased office space at 130 U.S. locations containing an aggregate of approximately 3.1 million square feet located in 23 states and the District of Columbia. In four countries outside the U.S., we leased office space at 16 locations containing an aggregate of approximately 75,000 square feet. Our leases expire primarily within the next five years, with the exception of 11 leases in the Washington, DC metropolitan area and five leases outside of the metro area, which will expire within the next five to 14 years. We anticipate that most of these leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases. All of our offices are in reasonably modern and well-maintained buildings. The facilities are substantially utilized and adequate for present operations.  

We maintain our corporate headquarters in approximately 99,000 square feet of space at 1100 North Glebe Road, Arlington, Virginia. See Note 14, Leases, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our lease commitments.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Al Shimari, et al. v. L-3 Services, Inc. et al.

On June 30, 2008, Plaintiff Al Shimari filed a twenty-count complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. Plaintiff Al Shimari is an Iraqi who claimed that he suffered significant physical injury and emotional distress while held at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. The lawsuit named CACI International Inc, CACI Premier Technology, Inc. and former CACI employee Timothy Dugan as Defendants, along with L-3 Services, Inc. The complaint alleged that the Defendants conspired with U.S. military personnel to engage in illegal treatment of Iraqi detainees.  The complaint did not allege any interaction between Plaintiff Al Shimari and any CACI employee. Plaintiff Al Shimari sought, inter alia, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees. On August 8, 2008, the court granted CACI’s motion to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Thereafter, an amended complaint was filed adding three plaintiffs.  On September 12, 2008, Mr. Dugan was dismissed from the case without prejudice. On October 2, 2008, CACI filed a motion to dismiss the case. CACI also moved to stay discovery pending further proceedings. The court granted CACI’s motion to stay discovery. On March 18, 2009, the court granted in part and denied in part CACI’s motion to dismiss. On March 23, 2009, CACI filed a notice of appeal with respect to the March 18, 2009 decision. Plaintiffs filed a motion to strike CACI’s notice of appeal and a motion to lift the stay on discovery. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied both motions. On April 27, 2009, Plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit deferred any ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion and issued a briefing schedule.  Plaintiffs filed a notice of cross-appeal, which CACI moved to dismiss.  The Court of Appeals dismissed the Plaintiffs’ cross-appeal.  On October 26, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard oral argument in the appeal and took the matter under advisement.  On September 21, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia and remanded the action with instructions to dismiss the action.  On October 5, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a petition for a rehearing en banc, which the Court of Appeals granted.  The Court of Appeals also invited the United States to participate in the en banc rehearing of the appeal as amicus curiae.  The United States participated in that capacity in the en banc rehearing.  On January 27, 2012, the Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, heard oral argument.  On May 11, 2012, the Court of Appeals, in an 11-3 decision, held that it lacked jurisdiction over the appeal and dismissed the appeal.  The action returned to the district court for further proceedings.

On October 12, 2012, the district court conducted a status conference at which the court asked the parties to prepare and submit a plan for discovery in the action. The parties subsequently filed a joint discovery plan, which the court approved. The Court also lifted the stay of discovery, and reinstated the claims arising under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) that the Court had previously dismissed. On December 26, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint. Defendants moved to dismiss several counts of the Second Amended Complaint. On March 8, 2013, the Court dismissed the conspiracy claims in the Second Amended Complaint, and dismissed CACI International Inc from the action. Subsequently, the Court allowed Plaintiffs to file a Third Amended Complaint for the purpose of repleading the conspiracy claims. On March 28, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Complaint, and on April 15, 2013, Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc. moved to dismiss the conspiracy claims in the Third Amended Complaint.

22

On March 19, 2013, the Court granted a motion for reconsideration filed by Defendants with respect to the statute of limitations applicable to the common law tort claims of three of the four Plaintiffs, and dismissed those claims. Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc. also filed a motion for sanctions with respect to the failure of three of the four Plaintiffs to appear for depositions and medical examinations as ordered by the court. On April 12, 2013, the Court denied that motion but entered an order requiring the three Plaintiffs to appear for depositions and medical examinations no later than April 26, 2013 and stating that if the three Plaintiffs did not comply with the order their claims were subject to dismissal. Plaintiffs did not appear for depositions in the United States as of April 26, 2013. Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc. then renewed its motion for sanctions, seeking dismissal, for the three Plaintiffs’ violation of the Court order to appear for depositions and medical examinations. Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc. also filed a motion to dismiss the ATS claims of all four Plaintiffs for lack of jurisdiction in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s April 17, 2013 decision in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, and a motion to dismiss the common law claims of the single Plaintiff with those claims on various grounds.

On June 26, 2013, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc.’s motions with respect to Plaintiffs’ ATS claims and Plaintiffs’ common law claims, and dismissing the Third Amended Complaint without prejudice.  The Court also denied all other pending motions, including Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc.’s motions for sanctions and to dismiss the conspiracy claims, as moot.

On July 24, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal of the district court’s June 26 decision.

On March 18, 2014, a three judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held a hearing on Plaintiffs’ appeal and took the matters under advisement.  On June 30, 2014, the three judge panel vacated the district court’s June 26, 2013 Order and remanded Plaintiffs’ claims for further proceeding.

On remand, Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc. moved to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims based upon the political question doctrine.  On June 18, 2015, the Court issued an Order granting Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc.’s motion to dismiss, and on June 26, 2015 entered a final judgment in favor of Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc.

On July 23, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal of the district court’s June 2015 decision.  Oral argument of the Plaintiffs’ appeal was heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on May 12, 2016.

Abbass, et al v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc. and CACI International Inc, Case No. 1:13CV1186-LMB/JFA (EDVA)

On September 20, 2013, fifty-five Plaintiffs filed a nine-count complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia styled Abbass, et al. v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc., et al. Plaintiffs are Iraqi nationals who assert that their allegations are essentially the same as those of the plaintiffs in Al Shimari. Plaintiffs claim that they suffered significant physical injury and emotional distress while in U.S. custody in Iraq. The lawsuit names CACI International Inc and CACI Premier Technology, Inc. as Defendants. The complaint alleges that Defendants conspired with U.S. military personnel to engage in illegal treatment of Iraqi detainees. The complaint does not allege any interaction between Plaintiffs and any CACI employee. Plaintiffs’ claims are brought pursuant to the Alien Tort Statute and the Torture Victims Protection Act. Plaintiffs seek, inter alia, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees.

Plaintiffs’ action was originally filed in 2009 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, but was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice in September 2011 after the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Saleh v. Titan Corp. and Ibrahim v. Titan Corp., 580 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

The CACI Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint.  Before deciding the motion to dismiss, the district court stayed the action pending a decision from the Court of Appeals in Al Shimari v. L-3 Services, Inc.

We are vigorously defending the above-described legal proceedings, and, based on our present knowledge of the facts, believe the lawsuits are completely without merit.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

23

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “CACI”.

The ranges of high and low sales prices of our common stock quoted on the New York Stock Exchange for each quarter during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

We have never paid a cash dividend. Our present policy is to retain earnings to provide funds for the operation and expansion of our business. We do not intend to pay any cash dividends at this time. The Board of Directors will determine whether to pay dividends in the future based on conditions then existing, including our earnings, financial condition and capital requirements, as well as economic and other conditions as the board may deem relevant.

As of August 12, 2016, the number of stockholders of record of our common stock was approximately 250.  The number of stockholders of record is not representative of the number of beneficial stockholders due to the fact that many shares are held by depositories, brokers, or nominees.

The following table provides certain information with respect to our purchases of shares of CACI International Inc’s common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2016:

24

The following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders on CACI International Inc's common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the Russell 1000 index and the Dow Jones U.S. Computer Services Total Stock Market index. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on June 30, 2011 and tracks it through June 30, 2016.

Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Returns

Performance Graph for

CACI International Inc

$100 invested on 6/30/11 in stock or index—including reinvestment of dividends.  Fiscal year ending June 30.

The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

25

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The selected financial data set forth below is derived from our audited financial statements for each of the fiscal years in the five year period ended June 30, 2016. This information should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated financial statements and the Notes thereto, included in Part II in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Income Statement Data

Balance Sheet Data

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is provided to enhance the understanding of, and should be read together with, our consolidated financial statements and the Notes to those statements that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Unless otherwise specifically noted, all years refer to our fiscal year which ends on June 30.

Overview

We are a leading provider of information solutions and services to the U.S. government. We derived 93.5 percent of our revenue during the year ended June 30, 2016 from contracts with U.S. government agencies, including 65.1 percent from DoD customers and 28.4 percent from U.S. federal civilian agency customers including the Department of Homeland Security. We also provide services to state and local governments, commercial customers and agencies of foreign governments.

Budgetary pressures and sequestration have created a challenging environment for us and other companies in our industry.  For further information on the trends currently impacting us, please see Item 1, Business – Industry Trends.

26

For the year ended June 30, 2016, 91.4 percent of our revenue was from contracts where we were the lead, or “prime,” contractor. Our contract base has approximately 730 active contracts and 1,907 active task orders.  We have a diverse mix of contract types, with 48.5 percent, 33.3 percent, and 18.2 percent of our revenue for the year ended June 30, 2016, derived from cost-reimbursable, fixed-price and time and materials (T&M) contracts, respectively.  

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in those financial statements and accompanying notes.  We consider the accounting policies and estimates addressed below to be the most important to our financial position and results of operations, either because of the significance of the financial statement item or because they require the exercise of significant judgment and/or use of significant estimates. Although we believe that the estimates we use are reasonable, due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making those estimates, actual results reported in future periods could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition/Contract Accounting

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

We generate almost all of our revenue from three different types of contractual arrangements: cost-plus-fee, T&M, and fixed-price contracts. Revenue on cost-plus-fee contracts is recognized to the extent of allowable costs incurred plus an estimate of the applicable fees earned. We consider fixed fees under cost-plus-fee contracts to be earned in proportion to the allowable costs incurred in performance of the contract. For cost-plus-fee contracts that include performance based fee incentives, and that are subject to the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Section 605-35, Revenue Recognition – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts (ASC 605-35), we recognize the relevant portion of the expected fee to be awarded by the customer at the time such fee can be reasonably estimated, based on factors such as our prior award experience and communications with the customer regarding performance. For such cost-plus-fee contracts subject to the provisions of ASC 605-10-S99, Revenue Recognition – SEC Materials (ASC 605-10-S99), we recognize the relevant portion of the fee upon customer approval. Revenue on T&M contracts is recognized to the extent of billable rates times hours delivered for services provided, to the extent of material cost for products delivered to customers, and to the extent of expenses incurred on behalf of the customers. Shipping and handling fees charged to the customers are recognized as revenue at the time products are delivered to the customers.

We have several basic categories of fixed price contracts: fixed unit price, fixed price-level of effort, and fixed price-completion. Revenue on fixed unit price contracts, where specified units of output under service arrangements are delivered, is recognized as units are delivered based on the specified price per unit. Revenue on fixed unit price maintenance contracts is recognized ratably over the length of the service period. Revenue for fixed price-level of effort contracts is recognized based upon the number of units of labor actually delivered multiplied by the agreed rate for each unit of labor.

Our fixed price-completion contracts which involve the design and development of complex customer systems are within the scope of ASC 605-35. Revenue is recognized on the percentage of completion method using costs incurred in relation to total estimated costs. For fixed price-completion contracts that are not within the scope of ASC 605-35, revenue is generally recognized over the period when services are provided.

Contract accounting requires judgment relative to assessing risks, estimating contract revenue and costs, and making assumptions for schedule and technical issues. Due to the size and nature of many of our contracts, the estimation of total revenue and cost at completion is complicated and subject to many variables. Contract costs include material, labor, subcontracting costs, and other direct costs, as well as an allocation of allowable indirect costs. Assumptions have to be made regarding the length of time to complete the contract because costs also include expected increases in wages and prices for materials. For contract change orders, claims or similar items, we apply judgment in estimating the amounts and assessing the potential for realization. These amounts are only included in contract value when they can be reliably estimated and realization is considered probable. Incentives or penalties related to performance on contracts are considered in estimating sales and profit rates, and are recorded when there is sufficient information for us to assess anticipated performance. Estimates of award fees for certain contracts may also be a factor in estimating revenue and profit rates based on actual and anticipated awards.

From time to time, we may proceed with work based on customer direction prior to the completion and signing of formal contract documents. We have a formal review process for approving any such work. Revenue associated with such work is recognized only when it can be reliably estimated and realization is probable. We base our estimates on previous experiences with the customer, communications with the customer regarding funding status, and our knowledge of available funding for the contract or program.

27

Costs of Revenue

Costs of revenue include all direct contract costs including subcontractor costs as well as indirect overhead costs and selling, general and administrative expenses that are allowable and allocable to contracts under federal procurement standards. Costs of revenue also include costs and expenses that are unallowable under applicable procurement standards, and thus are not allocable to contracts for billing purposes. Such costs and expenses do not directly generate revenue, but are necessary for business operations.

Accounting for Business Combinations, Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets

The purchase price of an acquired business is allocated to the tangible assets and separately identifiable intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values, with the excess recorded as goodwill.

The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were preliminarily determined using income, market and cost valuation methodologies. The fair value measurements were estimated using significant inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represent a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The income approach was primarily used to value the customer relationships intangible assets. The income approach indicates value for an asset or liability based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated over the remaining economic life of the asset or liability being measured. Both the amount and the duration of the cash flows are considered from a market participant perspective. Our estimates of market participant net cash flows considered historical and projected pricing, operational performance including company specific synergies, material and labor pricing, and other relevant customer, contractual and market factors. Where appropriate, the net cash flows are adjusted to reflect the uncertainties associated with the underlying assumptions, as well as the risk profile of the net cash flows utilized in the valuation. The adjusted future cash flows are then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate. Projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flow and the time value of money. The fair values of the tangible assets and acquired liabilities assumed, were determined using a combination of market and cost valuation methodologies. The market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets, liabilities, or a group of assets and liabilities. Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables. The cost approach, which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility.

We evaluate goodwill at least annually for impairment, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.  The evaluation includes comparing the fair value of the relevant reporting unit to the carrying value, including goodwill, of such unit. The level at which we test goodwill for impairment requires us to determine whether the operations below our operating segments constitute a self-sustaining business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results.  If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, no impairment loss is recognized. However, if the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the goodwill of the reporting unit may be impaired. Impairment is measured by comparing the derived fair value of the goodwill to its carrying value.  Separately identifiable intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment if impairment indicators are present.

We estimate the fair value of our reporting units using both an income approach and a market approach.  The valuation process considers our estimates of the future operating performance of each reporting unit.  Companies in similar industries are researched and analyzed and we consider the domestic and international economic and financial market conditions, both in general and specific to the industry in which we operate, prevailing as of the valuation date.  The income approach utilizes discounted cash flows.

We evaluate goodwill as of the first day of the fourth quarter.  In addition, we will perform interim impairment testing should circumstances requiring it arise.  We completed our annual goodwill assessment as of April 1, 2016 and no impairment charge was necessary as a result of this assessment.  We have concluded that none of our reporting units are at risk of a goodwill impairment in the near term as their fair values are considerably greater than their carrying values.

Determining the fair values of the reporting units inherently involves management judgments regarding assumptions such as future sales, profits and cash flows, determination of the discount rate, weighting of the income and market approaches, and the effect of the market conditions on those assumptions.  Due to the variables inherent in the estimation of a reporting unit’s fair value and the relative size of our goodwill, differences in assumptions could have a material effect on one or more of our reporting units and could result in a goodwill impairment charge in a future period.

28

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payments, including income tax consequences and classification on the statement of cash flows. Under the new standard, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies will be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur. Additionally, excess tax benefits will be classified as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows.  In regards to forfeitures, the entity can make an accounting policy election to either recognize forfeitures as they occur or estimate the number of awards expected to be forfeited.  The guidance in ASU 2016-09 is effective for the fiscal year, and interim periods within that fiscal year, beginning after December 15, 2016.  Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period, with adjustments reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.  The Company early adopted this standard during the fourth quarter of FY2016.

Upon adoption, the Company recognized excess tax benefits of $1.2 million during the year ended June 30, 2016 as a reduction to tax expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations, as though ASU 2016-09 had been in effect since the beginning of FY2016.  Consequently, this resulted in an increase in net income, an increase in earnings per share and a decrease in the annual effective tax rate.  In addition, the excess tax benefits that were previously presented as a financing activity on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows are now presented as an operating activity, with prior periods retrospectively adjusted.   The effect of the change on prior periods retrospectively adjusted is an increase in net cash provided by operating activities and a decrease in net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of $3.6 million and $4.8 million for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. With respect to forfeitures, the Company will continue to estimate the number of awards expected to be forfeited in accordance with our existing accounting policy.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, which amends the existing guidance on accounting for leases.  The new standard requires lessees to put virtually all leases on the balance sheet by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities. Lessor accounting is largely unchanged from that applied under previous guidance. The amended guidance is effective for the fiscal year, and interim periods within that fiscal year, beginning after December 15, 2018, and requires a modified retrospective approach.  Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The guidance in ASU 2015-17 is effective for the fiscal year, and interim periods within that fiscal year, beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted.  The Company early adopted this standard as of January 1, 2016 and applied the standard retrospectively.  As a result of adopting this standard, current deferred tax assets of $10.4 million were reclassified to net non-current deferred tax liabilities as of June 30, 2015.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, which simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to preliminary amounts recognized in a business combination by eliminating the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments. Instead, adjustments will be recognized in the period in which the adjustments are determined, including the effect on earnings of any amounts that would have been recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The Company early adopted this standard as of January 1, 2016, and will prospectively apply the standard to business combination adjustments identified after the date of adoption.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. Under the new standard, debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability are required to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The guidance in ASU 2015-03 is effective for the fiscal year, and interim periods within that fiscal year, beginning after December 15, 2015.  The Company early adopted this standard as of January 1, 2016 and applied the standard retrospectively.  As a result of adopting this standard, $4.7 million of debt issuance costs were reclassified from other long-term assets to long-term debt as of June 30, 2015.

29

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP. On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved a one-year deferral of the effective date of ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, using either a full retrospective approach or a modified approach. Early adoption up to the original effective date is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements and has not yet determined the method by which the Company will adopt the standard.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the relative percentages that certain items of expense and earnings bear to revenue.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Years ended June 30,

Revenue

For FY2016, our total revenue increased from FY2015 by $430.6 million or 13.0 percent.  This growth in revenue resulted from the NSS acquisition and other recent acquisitions completed during the last twelve months.  Revenue generated from the date a business is acquired through the first anniversary of that date is considered acquired revenue.  Excluding acquired revenue, organic revenue decreased by 0.8 percent, primarily due to contract completions.

In light of the BCA, the provisions of the BBA, and deficit reduction pressures, discretionary spending by the federal government continues to be constrained and is expected to be so through the government’s FY2025.  We experienced the impact of these fiscal constraints on contracts and task orders we hold and delays in the awarding of contracts on which we have bid.  We expect this trend to continue into the government’s Fiscal Year 2017, beginning on October 1, 2016.

For FY2015, our total revenue decreased from FY2014 by $251.1 million, or 7.0 percent, primarily related to a decrease in revenue from the DoD offset in part by an increase in federal civilian agency work.  This decrease in revenue was primarily attributable to lower subcontractor costs and other direct costs (ODCs) resulting from certain contracts reaching their normal end-of-life, federal government budget-related reductions activities and the drawdown in Southwest Asia.

30

The following table summarizes revenue earned by each of the customer groups for the three most recent fiscal years:

DoD revenue increased 10.0 percent, or $222.3 million in FY2016 as compared to FY2015.  Acquired DoD revenue accounted for $292.1 million of the revenue increase from FY2015 to FY2016.  Excluding acquired revenue, DoD revenue decreased by $69.8 million or 3.1 percent, primarily due to lower subcontractor costs and ODCs resulting from the drawdown in Afghanistan, federal budget-related reduction activities and reduced customer requirements.  DoD revenue includes services provided to the U.S. Army, our largest customer, where our services focus on supporting readiness, tactical military intelligence, and communications systems. DoD revenue also includes work with the U.S. Navy, and other DoD agencies.

Revenue from DoD customers decreased 14.0 percent, or $361.1 million, to $2.2 billion for FY2015 as compared to FY2014.  This decrease was attributable primarily to lower subcontractor costs and ODCs resulting from the drawdown in Southwest Asia and federal government budget-related activities.  

Federal civilian agencies revenue increased 19.6 percent, or $174.3 million for FY2016 as compared to FY2015.  The acquisition of NSS accounted for $133.1 million of the increase in federal civilian agency revenue.  NSS contracts consist mainly of information technology support services.  Excluding NSS, federal civilian agency revenue increased $41.2 million or 4.6 percent.  This increase was primarily attributable to our intelligence systems and services, investigations and litigation support, and business systems contracts.  Federal civilian agency revenue also includes services provided to non-DoD national intelligence agencies.

Revenue from federal civilian agencies increased 15.1 percent, or $116.5 million, to $888.2 million during FY2015 as compared to FY2014.  This increase was primarily attributable to the Six3 Systems acquisition completed during November 2013, growth in our Office of Personnel Management (OPM) contract and other new business.  

Commercial and other revenue increased 12.0 percent, or $24.3 million in FY2016 as compared to FY2015.  Acquired revenue accounted for $19.1 million of the growth while $5.2 million was organic.  The increase came from both our international and domestic technology services and cyber security products.  Of the total commercial and other revenue, international operations accounted for 66.1 percent or $150.1 million for FY2016 while domestic operations accounted for 33.9 percent or $77.0 million.

Commercial and other revenue increased 1.7 percent, or $3.3 million, to $202.9 million in FY2015 as compared to FY2014. Commercial revenue is derived from both international and domestic operations. In FY2015, international operations accounted for 71.3 percent, or $144.6 million, of the total commercial revenue, while domestic operations accounted for 28.7 percent, or $58.3 million.

Revenue from state and local governments increased by $9.7 million during FY2016, as compared to FY2015.  This increase was the result of the NSS information technology seat management and network support contracts.  In FY2015 as compared to FY2014, revenue from state and local governments decreased by $10.0 million which was due to the completion of several local government system support contracts. Revenue from state and local governments represented less than one percent of our total revenue in each of FY2016, FY2015, and FY2014.

Income from Operations

During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016, 2015, and 2014, as a percentage of revenue, total direct costs were 66.4 percent, 66.2 percent, and 68.1 percent, respectively.  Direct costs include direct labor and ODCs, which include, among other costs, subcontracted labor and materials along with equipment purchases and travel expenses.  ODCs, which are common in our industry, typically are incurred in response to specific customer tasks and may vary from period to period.

31

The single largest component of direct costs, direct labor, was $1.2 billion, $1.1 billion and $1.0 billion in FY2016, FY2015, and FY2014, respectively. ODCs were $1.3 billion, $1.1 billion, and $1.4 billion in FY2016, FY2015, and FY2014, respectively.  The direct labor and ODC increase from FY2015 to FY2016 were primarily the result of the acquisition of NSS, partially offset by a decrease in subcontractor costs and ODCs as a result of the drawdown in Afghanistan as well as federal government budget-related reduction activities and reduced customer requirements.  This decrease in ODCs from FY2014 to FY2015 was primarily driven by certain contracts reaching their normal end-of-life, decreases in subcontractor costs and ODCs as a result of the drawdown in Southwest Asia and federal government budget-related reduction activities.  

Indirect costs and selling expenses which include fringe benefits (attributable to both direct and indirect labor), marketing and bid and proposal costs, indirect labor and other discretionary expenses, increased $109.5 million or 13.4 percent in FY2016 as compared to FY2015.  This increase in indirect cost and selling expenses is due primarily to the NSS acquisition, which includes transaction costs of $7.3 million as well as fringe benefit costs related to increased direct labor and incentive costs.  Indirect costs and selling expense increased $1.9 million or 0.2 percent in FY2015 as compared to FY2014.  This increase was due primarily to fringe benefit costs related to increased direct labor and startup costs for the growth in the OPM contract.  As a percentage of revenue indirect costs and selling expenses were 24.8 percent, 24.7 percent and 22.9 percent for FY2016, FY2015 and FY2014, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $1.3 million, or 2.0 percent, in FY2016 as compared to FY2015.  The decrease was primarily attributable to lower amortization of intangible assets from runoff amortization expense related to prior acquisitions partially offset by additional intangible amortization expense related to the NSS acquisition.  In FY2015 depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.9 million or 1.4 percent as compared to FY2014.  The increase was primarily attributable to amortization of intangible assets associated with Six3 Systems acquisition offset by decreased amortization of intangibles on prior years’ acquisitions

Net interest expense and other increased $6.4 million, or 18.4 percent, in FY2016 as compared to FY2015.  This increase primarily relates to interest on $550.0 million of additional indebtedness incurred to fund the acquisition of NSS.  Net interest expense and other decreased $3.4 million, or 8.9 percent, in FY2015 as compared to FY2014 primarily due to decreased interest expense on our Convertible Notes which matured May 2014 offset by higher interest related to additional indebtedness incurred to fund the acquisition of Six3 Systems.

The effective income tax rates in FY2016, FY2015, and FY2014, were 36.1 percent, 37.4 percent, and 38.1 percent, respectively. The tax rate in each year was positively impacted by tax benefits related to deductions claimed for income from qualified domestic production activities and non-taxable gains on assets invested in corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) policies.  For the year ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the tax rate was also favorably affected by the reinstatement of the work opportunity tax credit benefit and reversal of tax reserves resulting from the lapse of a statute of limitations.  In addition, the year ended June 30, 2016 the tax rate was favorably impacted by the adoption of the new employee share based payment accounting standard.  The effective tax rate for the year ended June 30, 2014 was negatively impacted by non-deductible acquisition related expenses incurred in the acquisition of Six3 Systems.

Effects of Inflation

During FY2016, 48.5 percent of our business was conducted under cost-reimbursable contracts which automatically adjust revenue to cover costs that are affected by inflation.  18.2 percent of our revenue was earned under T&M contracts, where labor rates for many of the services provided are often fixed for several years. Under certain T&M contracts containing IDIQ procurement arrangements, we adjust labor rates annually as permitted. The remaining portion of our business is fixed-price and may span multiple years. We generally have been able to price our T&M and fixed-price contracts in a manner that accommodates the rates of inflation experienced in recent years.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, our positive cash flow from operations and our available credit facilities have provided adequate liquidity and working capital to fund our operational needs. Cash flows from operations totaled $242.6 million, $226.9 million and $203.5 million for the years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

32

The Credit Facility is a $1,981.3 million credit facility, which includes an $850.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Facility), and a $1,131.3 million term loan (the Term Loan).  The Revolving Facility has subfacilities of $100.0 million for same-day swing line borrowings and $25.0 million for stand-by letters of credit.  The Credit Facility was amended during the third quarter of FY2016 in connection with the Company’s acquisition of NSS (see Note 4).  CACI financed the transaction by borrowing $250.0 million under its existing Revolving Facility and by entering into an eighth amendment and first incremental facility amendment to its Credit Facility to allow for the incurrence of $300.0 million in additional Term Loans.  At June 30, 2016, $1,032.8 million was outstanding under the Term Loan, $440.0 million was outstanding under the Revolving Facility, we had no borrowings on the swing line and a $0.4 million letter of credit was outstanding.  As of June 30, 2016, the Credit Facility had an accordion feature that would allow the facility to be expanded in an aggregate amount of up to the sum of $400.0 million plus an amount such that the Consolidated Senior Secured Leverage Ratio would not be greater than 2.75:1.0.

The Term Loan is a five-year secured facility under which principal payments are due in quarterly installments of $13.5 million through June 30, 2018 and $27.0 million thereafter until the balance is due in full on June 1, 2020.

The interest rates applicable to loans under the Credit Facility are floating interest rates that, at our option, equal a base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin based upon our consolidated total leverage ratio.

The Credit Facility requires us to comply with certain financial covenants, including a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.  The Credit Facility also includes customary negative covenants restricting or limiting our ability to guarantee or incur additional indebtedness, grant liens or other security interests to third parties, make loans or investments, transfer assets, declare dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock or make other distributions, prepay subordinated indebtedness and engage in mergers, acquisitions or other business combinations, in each case except as expressly permitted under the Credit Facility.  Since the inception of the Credit Facility, we have been in compliance with all of the financial covenants.  A majority of our assets serve as collateral under the Credit Facility.

Cash and cash equivalents were $49.1 million and $35.4 million as of June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our operating cash flow was $242.6 million for FY2016, compared to $226.9 million for the same period a year ago. The increase in cash from operations is a result of the NSS acquisition on February 1, 2016. Days-sales outstanding were 62 and 60 at June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase in DSO is a result of a temporary increase associated with the NSS acquisition.

We used $607.6 million and $31.4 million of cash in investing activities during FY2016 and FY2015, respectively. During the twelve months ended June 30, 2016 we paid $587.8 million for business acquisitions, as compared to $15.0 million during the same period a year ago.  Purchases of office and computer related equipment of $20.8 million and $17.4 million in FY2016 and FY2015, respectively, accounted for a majority of the remaining funds used in investing activities. Generally, we have relatively low capital expenditure requirements for our business, and expect these expenditures in the coming years to remain consistent with the levels reported in FY2016.

Cash flows provided by financing activities were $381.5 million during FY2016 while cash used in financing activities was $222.5 million during FY2015. During the year ended June 30, 2016, we had net borrowings of $389.2 million under our Credit Facility compared to net repayments of $213.5 million in FY2015.  

We believe that the combination of internally generated funds, available bank borrowings, and cash and cash equivalents on hand will provide the required liquidity and capital resources necessary to fund on-going operations, customary capital expenditures, debt service obligations, and other working capital requirements over the next twelve months. Over the longer term, our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations necessary to fulfill the obligations under the Credit Facility will depend on our future financial performance which will be affected by many factors outside of our control, including current worldwide economic conditions.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

We use off-balance sheet arrangements related to the lease of all of our current office and warehouse facilities. Operating leases are also used to finance the use of computers, servers, phone systems, and to a lesser extent, other fixed assets, such as furnishings, that are obtained in connection with business acquisitions. We generally assume the lease rights and obligations of companies acquired in business combinations and continue leasing equipment under operating leases until the end of the lease term following the acquisition date. We generally do not finance capital expenditures with operating leases, but instead finance such purchases with available cash balances. For additional information regarding our operating lease commitments, see Note 14 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Credit Facility provides for stand-by letters of credit aggregating up to $25.0 million that reduce the funds available under the Revolving Facility when issued. As of June 30, 2016, we had an outstanding letter of credit of $0.4 million. We have no other material off-balance sheet financing arrangements. 

33

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2016 that require us to make future cash payments:

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

The interest rates on both the Term Loan and the Revolving Facility are affected by changes in market interest rates. We have the ability to manage these fluctuations in part through interest rate hedging alternatives in the form of interest rate swaps. We have entered into floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $900 million related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness. All remaining balances under our Term Loan, and any additional amounts that may be borrowed under our Revolving Facility, are currently subject to interest rate fluctuations. With every one percent fluctuation in the applicable interest rates, interest expense on our variable rate debt for the twelve months ended June 30, 2016 would have fluctuated by approximately $6.4 million.

Approximately 4.0 percent and 4.4 percent of our total revenue in FY2016 and FY2015, respectively, was derived from our international operations headquartered in the U.K. Our practice in our international operations is to negotiate contracts in the same currency in which the predominant expenses are incurred, thereby mitigating the exposure to foreign currency exchange fluctuations. It is not possible to accomplish this in all cases; thus, there is some risk that profits will be affected by foreign currency exchange fluctuations. As of June 30, 2016, we held a combination of euros and pounds sterling in the U.K. and in the Netherlands equivalent to approximately $21.1 million. Although these balances are generally available to fund ordinary business operations without legal or other restrictions, a significant portion is not immediately available to fund U.S. operations unless repatriated. Our intention is to reinvest earnings from our foreign subsidiaries.  This allows us to better utilize our cash resources on behalf of our foreign subsidiaries, thereby mitigating foreign currency conversion risks.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The Consolidated Financial Statements of CACI International Inc and subsidiaries are provided in Part IV in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

34

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

We had no disagreements with our independent registered public accounting firm on accounting principles, practices or financial statement disclosure during and through the date of the consolidated financial statements included in this report.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in the Exchange Act Ruling 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic filings with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The effectiveness of a system of disclosure controls and procedures is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of internal controls, and fraud. Due to such inherent limitations, there can be only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that any system of disclosure controls and procedures will be successful in detecting or preventing all errors or fraud, or in making all material information known in a timely manner to the appropriate levels of management.

We performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision of the CEO and CFO, as of June 30, 2016. Based on the evaluation procedures, our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2016.

The management of CACI International Inc is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f), and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

We maintain internal controls over financial reporting that are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting, and the preparation of financial statements. CACI International Inc’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that 1) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; 2) ensure the maintenance of records that accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; 3) ensure that our receipts, expenditures and asset dispositions are made in accordance with director and management authorizations; and 4) provide reasonable assurance that our assets are properly safeguarded.  

With the participation of our CEO and CFO, we performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to comply with the rules on internal control over financial reporting issued pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In making this evaluation, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on the evaluation procedures, our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that, as of June 30, 2016, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the independent auditors’ report on internal control over financial reporting, are included in Part IV of this report.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, an evaluation was also performed of any changes in our internal control procedures over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter. Based on this evaluation, management determined there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

35

PART III

The Information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of Form 10-K has been omitted in reliance on General Instruction G(3) and is incorporated herein by reference to our proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as set forth below:

Item 10. Officers, Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

Except for the specific disclosures below, the information required by this Item 10 is included under the headings “Executive Officers” and “Corporate Governance” in our 2016 Proxy Statement for the annual meeting to be held with respect to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 (2016 Proxy Statement) and is incorporated by reference.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and persons performing similar functions. That code, our Standards of Ethics and Business Conduct, is posted in the “Investors Relations/Corporate Governance” section of our website at www.caci.com and a printed copy of such code will be furnished free of charge to any shareholder who requests a copy.

We intend to disclose any amendment to the Standards of Ethics and Business Conduct that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K, and any waiver from a provision of the Standards of Ethics and Business Conduct granted to any director, principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or any other executive officer of the Company, in the “Investors” section of our website at www.caci.com within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

We have adopted a set of corporate governance guidelines in accordance with the requirements of Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual. Those guidelines can be found posted on our website at www.caci.com and a printed copy will be furnished free of charge to any shareholder who requests a copy.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item 11 will be incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company’s fiscal year.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management

The information required by this Item 12 will be incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company’s fiscal year.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information required by this Item 13 will be incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company’s fiscal year.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this Item 14 will be incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company’s fiscal year.

36

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

37

38

39

40

Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

August 24, 2016

The management of CACI International Inc is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Management maintains a comprehensive system of internal controls intended to ensure that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization, that assets are safeguarded, and that financial records are reliable. CACI International Inc’s internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to Company management and its Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Due to inherent limitations, internal control systems can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation, and may not prevent or detect financial statement misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of internal control effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that existing controls may become inadequate because of changing conditions, or that the degree of compliance with existing policies and procedures may deteriorate.

The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of CACI International Inc’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Framework), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that CACI International Inc’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2016.

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein and has reported on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016.

41

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of CACI International Inc

We have audited CACI International Inc’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). CACI International Inc’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, CACI International Inc maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of CACI International Inc as of June 30, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2016 of CACI International Inc and our report dated August 24, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

McLean, Virginia

August 24, 2016

42

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of CACI International Inc

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CACI International Inc as of June 30, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of CACI International Inc at June 30, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), CACI International Inc's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated August 24, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

McLean, Virginia

August 24, 2016

43

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)