CACI INTERNATIONAL INC /DE/ - Quarter Report: 2016 September (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

OR

For the transition period from          to          

Commission File Number 001-31400

CACI International Inc

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1100 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA 22201

(Address of principal executive offices)

(703) 841-7800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  ☒    No  ☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  ☒    No  ☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  ☐    No  ☒.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of Common Stock, as of October 14, 2016: CACI International Inc Common Stock, $0.10 par value, 24,378,137 shares.

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

2

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

3

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands)

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

4

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

5

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands)

See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

6

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of CACI International Inc and subsidiaries (CACI or the Company) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and include the assets, liabilities, results of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows for the Company, including its subsidiaries and ventures that are majority-owned or otherwise controlled by the Company.  Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and amounts included in other current assets and current liabilities that meet the definition of a financial instrument approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these amounts.  The fair value of the Company’s debt outstanding as of September 30, 2016 under its bank credit facility approximates its carrying value.  The fair value of the Company’s debt under its bank credit facility was estimated using Level 2 inputs based on market data of companies with a corporate rating similar to CACI’s that have recently priced credit facilities.  See Notes 6 and 12.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications (all of which are of a normal, recurring nature) that are necessary for the fair presentation of the periods presented.  It is suggested that these unaudited consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s latest annual report to the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2016.  The results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent interim period or for the full fiscal year.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payments, including income tax consequences and classification on the statement of cash flows. Under the new standard, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies will be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur. Additionally, excess tax benefits will be classified as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows.  In regards to forfeitures, the entity can make an accounting policy election to either recognize forfeitures as they occur or estimate the number of awards expected to be forfeited.  The guidance in ASU 2016-09 is effective for the fiscal year, and interim periods within that fiscal year, beginning after December 15, 2016.  Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period, with adjustments reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.  The Company early adopted this standard during the fourth quarter of FY16, and is therefore required to report the impact as though the ASU had been adopted on July 1, 2015.

Upon adoption, the Company recognized excess tax benefits of $0.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015 as a reduction to tax expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations, as though ASU 2016-09 had been in effect since the beginning of FY16.  Consequently, this resulted in an increase in net income, an increase in earnings per share and a decrease in the annual effective tax rate.  In addition, the excess tax benefits that were previously presented as a financing activity on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows are now presented as an operating activity, with periods prior to FY16 retrospectively adjusted.  With respect to forfeitures, the Company will continue to estimate the number of awards expected to be forfeited in accordance with our existing accounting policy.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, which amends the existing guidance on accounting for leases.  The new standard requires lessees to put virtually all leases on the balance sheet by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities. Lessor accounting is largely unchanged from that applied under previous guidance. The amended guidance is effective for the fiscal year, and interim periods within that fiscal year, beginning after December 15, 2018, and requires a modified retrospective approach.  Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

7

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP. On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved a one-year deferral of the effective date of ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, using either a full retrospective approach or a modified approach. Early adoption up to the original effective date is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements and has not yet determined the method by which the Company will adopt the standard.

NSS Acquisition

On February 1, 2016, the Company acquired 100 percent of the outstanding shares of L-3 National Security Solutions, Inc. and L-3 Data Tactics Corporation (together, “NSS”).  NSS is a prime mission partner to the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), U.S. government intelligence agencies, and U.S. federal civilian agencies.  The acquisition will expand CACI’s opportunities in many of our key market areas and expand our current customer base.  CACI financed the acquisition by borrowing $250.0 million under its existing revolving facility and by entering into an eighth amendment and first incremental facility amendment to its credit facility to allow for the incurrence of $300.0 million in additional term loans.

The initial purchase consideration paid at closing to acquire NSS was $550.0 million plus $11.2 million representing a preliminary net working capital adjustment.  Subsequent to closing, CACI received a refund of $13.6 million for the final net working capital adjustment.

CACI is in the process of finalizing its valuation of all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. As the amounts recorded for certain assets and liabilities are preliminary in nature, they are subject to adjustment as additional information is obtained about the facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date.  The final determination of fair values of certain assets and liabilities will be completed within the measurement period of up to one year from the acquisition date as permitted under GAAP. The NSS acquisition could necessitate the need to use the full one year measurement period to adequately analyze and assess a number of factors used in establishing the asset and liability fair values as of the acquisition date, including receivables and deferred revenue, contractual obligations, income tax obligations, and certain reserves. Any potential adjustments made could be material in relation to the preliminary values presented in the table below. Based on the Company’s preliminary valuation, the total estimated consideration of $547.5 million has been allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in thousands):

8

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

The goodwill of $367.3 million is largely attributable to the assembled workforce of NSS and expected synergies between the Company and NSS.  The estimated fair value attributed to intangible assets, which consists of customer contracts and related customer relationships, is being amortized on an accelerated basis over approximately 15 years.  The fair value attributed to the intangible assets acquired was based on preliminary estimates, assumptions, and other information compiled by management, including independent valuations that utilized established valuation techniques.  Of the value attributed to goodwill and intangible assets, $47.7 million is deductible for income tax purposes.

Intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

Intangible assets are primarily amortized on an accelerated basis over periods ranging from one to fifteen years.  The weighted-average period of amortization for all customer contracts and related customer relationships as of September 30, 2016 is 14 years, and the weighted-average remaining period of amortization is 11.8 years.  The weighted-average period of amortization for acquired technologies as of September 30, 2016 is 10 years, and the weighted-average remaining period of amortization is 5.4 years.

Expected amortization expense for the remainder of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017, and for each of the fiscal years thereafter, is as follows (in thousands):

9

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended June 30, 2016 and the three months ended September 30, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):

Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

Bank Credit Facility

The Company has a $1,981.3 million credit facility (the Credit Facility), which consists of an $850.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Facility) and a $1,131.3 million term loan (the Term Loan). The Revolving Facility has subfacilities of $100.0 million for same-day swing line loan borrowings and $25.0 million for stand-by letters of credit.  At any time and so long as no default has occurred, the Company has the right to increase the Revolving Facility or the Term Loan in an aggregate principal amount of up to the greater of $400.0 million or an amount subject to 2.75 times senior secured leverage, calculated assuming the Revolving Facility is fully drawn, with applicable lender approvals.  The Credit Facility is available to refinance existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including working capital expenses and capital expenditures.

The Credit Facility was amended during the third quarter of FY16 in connection with the Company’s acquisition of NSS (see Note 3).  CACI financed the transaction by borrowing $250.0 million under its existing Revolving Facility and by entering into an eighth amendment and first incremental facility amendment to its Credit Facility to allow for the incurrence of $300.0 million in additional Term Loans.

The Revolving Facility is a secured facility that permits continuously renewable borrowings of up to $850.0 million. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had $395.0 million outstanding under the Revolving Facility, no borrowings on the swing line and an outstanding letter of credit of $0.4 million.  The Company pays a quarterly facility fee for the unused portion of the Revolving Facility.

The Term Loan is a five-year secured facility under which principal payments are due in quarterly installments of $13.5 million through June 30, 2018 and $27.0 million thereafter until the balance is due in full on June 1, 2020. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had $1,019.3 million outstanding under the Term Loan.

The interest rates applicable to loans under the Credit Facility are floating interest rates that, at the Company’s option, equal a base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus, in each case, an applicable rate based upon the Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio.  As of September 30, 2016, the effective interest rate, including the impact of the Company’s floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements and excluding the effect of amortization of debt financing costs, for the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was 3.13 percent.

10

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

The Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with certain financial covenants, including a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.  The Credit Facility also includes customary negative covenants restricting or limiting the Company’s ability to guarantee or incur additional indebtedness, grant liens or other security interests to third parties, make loans or investments, transfer assets, declare dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock or make other distributions, prepay subordinated indebtedness and engage in mergers, acquisitions or other business combinations, in each case except as expressly permitted under the Credit Facility.  As of September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants.  A majority of the Company’s assets serve as collateral under the Credit Facility.

All debt issuance costs are being amortized from the date incurred to the expiration date of the Credit Facility. 

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company periodically uses derivative financial instruments as part of a strategy to manage exposure to market risks associated with interest rate fluctuations.  The Company has entered into several floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $900.0 million which hedge a portion of the Company’s floating rate indebtedness.  The swaps mature at various dates through 2022.  The Company has designated the swaps as cash flow hedges. Unrealized gains are recognized as assets while unrealized losses are recognized as liabilities. The interest rate swap agreements are highly correlated to the changes in interest rates to which the Company is exposed. Unrealized gains and losses on these swaps are designated as effective or ineffective. Realized gains and losses in connection with each required interest payment are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss to interest expense.  The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

The effect of derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of operations and accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 is as follows (in thousands):

The aggregate maturities of long-term debt at September 30, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):

The Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims, and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Management is of the opinion that any liability or loss associated with such matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations and liquidity.

11

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

Government Contracting

Payments to the Company on cost-plus-fee and time-and-materials contracts are subject to adjustment upon audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and other government agencies that do not utilize DCAA’s services. The DCAA is currently nearing completion of its audits of the Company’s incurred cost submissions for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2011, and an intelligence agency is nearing completion of its audit of direct costs on selected contracts through our fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.  DCAA audits of our incurred cost submissions for the year ended June 30, 2012 have commenced, and an intelligence agency has commenced audits of direct costs on selected contracts through our fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.  In the opinion of management, adjustments that may result from these audits and the audits not yet started are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as the Company has accrued its best estimate of potential disallowances. Additionally, the DCAA continually reviews the cost accounting and other practices of government contractors, including the Company. In the course of those reviews, cost accounting and other issues are identified, discussed and settled.

On March 26, 2012, the Company received a subpoena from the Defense Criminal Investigative Service seeking documents related to one of the Company’s contracts for the period of January 1, 2007 through March 26, 2012.  The Company has provided documents responsive to the subpoena and is cooperating fully with the government’s investigation.  The Company has accrued its current best estimate of the potential outcome within its estimated range of zero to $3.9 million.

On April 9, 2012, the Company received a letter from the Department of Justice (DoJ) informing the Company that the DoJ is investigating whether the Company violated the civil False Claims Act by submitting false claims to receive federal funds pursuant to a GSA contract.  Specifically, the DoJ is investigating whether the Company failed to comply with contract requirements and applicable regulations by improperly billing for certain contracting personnel under the contract.  The Company has not accrued any liability as based on its present knowledge of the facts, it does not believe an unfavorable outcome is probable.

We pursued an appeal at the ASBCA of a determination made by the Army Contracting Command in response to an audit performed on behalf of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) of two task orders under which we performed work in Afghanistan.  We appealed the Army’s determination that our methods for computing employee danger pay were incorrect, and needed to be changed.  In a decision dated July 18, 2016, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals ruled in favor of the Company.

We are also pursuing appeals at the ASBCA of determinations and demands made by the DCMA associated with questioned direct costs from DCAA audits of our incurred cost submissions for our fiscal years ending June 30 2006, 2007, and 2008.  The Company has not accrued any liabilities for these determinations and demands and does not believe unfavorable outcomes are probable.

Virginia Sales and Use Tax Audit

The Company is under audit for sales and use tax related issues by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Company has accrued its current best estimate of the potential outcome within its estimated range of $1.0 million to $2.5 million.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized, together with the income tax benefits recognized, is as follows (in thousands):

Under the terms of its 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan), the Company may issue, among others, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, SSARs, and performance awards, collectively referred to herein as equity instruments. During the periods presented all equity instrument grants were made in the form of RSUs.  Other than performance-based RSUs (PRSUs) which contain a market-based element, the fair value of RSU grants was determined based on the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of RSUs with market-based vesting features was also measured on the grant date, but was done so using a binomial lattice model.

12

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

Annual grants under the 2006 Plan are generally made to the Company’s key employees during the first quarter of the Company’s fiscal year and to members of the Company’s Board of Directors during the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal year. With the approval of its Chief Executive Officer, the Company also issues equity instruments to strategic new hires and to employees who have demonstrated superior performance.

In September 2014, the Company made its annual grant to key employees consisting of 180,570 PRSUs.  The final number of such PRSUs that are earned by participants and vest is based on the achievement of a specified earnings per share (EPS) for the year ended June 30, 2015 and on the average share price of Company stock for the 90 day period ending September 23, 2015, 2016 and 2017 as compared to the average share price for the 90 day period ended September 23, 2014.  The specified EPS for the year ended June 30, 2015 was met and the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ending September 23, 2016 exceeded the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ended September 23, 2014, resulting in an additional 19,190 RSUs earned by participants.

In September 2015, the Company made its annual grant to key employees consisting of 208,160 PRSUs.  The final number of such PRSUs that are earned by participants and vest is based on the achievement of a specified EPS for the year ending June 30, 2016 and on the average share price of Company stock for the 90 day periods ending September 18, 2016, 2017 and 2018 as compared to the average share price for the 90 day period ended September 18, 2015.  The specified EPS for the year ended June 30, 2016 was met and the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ending September 18, 2016 exceeded the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ended September 18, 2015, resulting in an additional 11,811 RSUs earned by participants.  

In September 2016, the Company made its annual grant to its key employees consisting of 193,420 PRSUs.  The final number of such PRSUs that are earned by participants and vest is based on the achievement of a specified EPS for the year ended June 30, 2017 and on the average share price of Company stock for the 90 day period ending September 30, 2017, 2018 and 2019 as compared to the average share price for the 90 day period ended September 30, 2016.  If EPS for the year ending June 30, 2017 exceeds the specified EPS and the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ending September 30, 2017, 2018 and 2019 exceeds the average share price of the Company’s stock for the 90 day period ended September 30, 2016 by 100 percent or more, then an additional 193,420 could be earned by participants.  This is the maximum number of additional RSUs that can be earned related to the September 2016 annual grant.  In addition to the performance and market conditions, there is a service vesting condition which stipulates that 50 percent of the earned award will vest on October 1, 2019 and 50 percent of the earned award will vest on October 1, 2020, in both cases dependent upon continuing service by the grantee as an employee of the Company, unless the grantee is eligible for earlier vesting upon retirement or certain other events.

The total number of shares authorized by shareholders for grants under the 2006 Plan and its predecessor plan is 12,450,000 as of September 30, 2016. The aggregate number of grants that may be made may exceed this approved amount as forfeited SSARs, stock options, restricted stock and RSUs, and vested but unexercised SSARs and stock options that expire, become available for future grants. As of September 30, 2016, cumulative grants of 13,978,332 equity instruments underlying the shares authorized have been awarded, and 4,217,234 of these instruments have been forfeited.

Activity related to RSUs during the three months ended September 30, 2016 is as follows:

As of September 30, 2016, there was $51.9 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to RSUs scheduled to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.0 years.

13

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (ASC 260), requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share on the face of the income statement. Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted earnings per share reflects potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock but not securities that are anti-dilutive, including stock options and SSARs with an exercise price greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock. Using the treasury stock method, diluted earnings per share include the incremental effect of SSARs, stock options, restricted shares, and those RSUs that are no longer subject to a market or performance condition.  There were no anti-dilutive common stock equivalents for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.  The PRSUs granted in September 2016 are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the underlying shares are considered to be contingently issuable shares.  These shares will be included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share beginning in the first reporting period in which the performance metric is achieved.  The chart below shows the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. Tax statutes and regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to interpretation and require the application of significant judgment.  The Company’s total liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 was $0.4 million for both periods. The $0.4 million unrecognized tax benefit at September 30, 2016, if recognized, would impact the Company’s effective tax rate.  

The Company reports operating results and financial data in two segments: domestic operations and international operations. Domestic operations provide information solutions and services to its customers. Its customers are primarily U.S. federal government agencies. Other customers of the Company’s domestic operations include state and local governments and commercial enterprises.  The Company places employees in locations around the world in support of its clients. International operations offer services to both commercial and non-U.S. government customers primarily within the Company’s business systems and enterprise IT markets. The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on net income. Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is as follows (in thousands):

14

CACI INTERNATIONAL INC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in an orderly transaction.  The market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset or liability is known as the principal market.  When no principal market exists, the most advantageous market is used.  This is the market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the price that maximizes the amount that would be received or minimizes the amount that would be paid.  Fair value is based on assumptions market participants would make in pricing the asset or liability.  Generally, fair value is based on observable quoted market prices or derived from observable market data when such market prices or data are available.  When such prices or inputs are not available, the reporting entity should use valuation models.

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized based on the priority of the inputs used to measure fair value. The inputs used in measuring fair value are categorized into three levels, as follows:

The Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value included interest rate swap agreements and contingent consideration in connection with business combinations.  The following table summarizes the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016, and the level they fall within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):

Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.

Various acquisitions completed during FY16 contained provisions requiring that the Company pay contingent consideration in the event the acquired businesses achieved certain specified earnings results during the two and three year periods subsequent to each acquisition.  The Company determined the fair value of the contingent consideration as of each acquisition date using a valuation model which included the evaluation of the most likely outcome and the application of an appropriate discount rate.  At the end of each reporting period, the fair value of the contingent consideration was remeasured and any changes were recorded in indirect costs and selling expenses.  During the three months ended September 30, 2016, this remeasurement resulted in a $0.4 million change to the liability recorded.

On October 1, 2016, CACI Limited acquired a business in the United Kingdom that provides outsourced database managed services and associated database segmentation and analytics for large corporate customers. The purchase consideration for this business is approximately $2.8 million, which includes initial cash payments, deferred consideration and contingent consideration to be paid upon achieving certain metrics.

15

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

There are statements made herein which do not address historical facts and, therefore, could be interpreted to be forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Such statements are subject to factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results.  The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated include, but are not limited to, the following: regional and national economic conditions in the United States and globally (including the impact of uncertainty regarding U.S. debt limits and actions taken related thereto); terrorist activities or war; changes in interest rates; currency fluctuations; significant fluctuations in the equity markets; changes in our effective tax rate; failure to achieve contract awards in connection with re-competes for present business and/or competition for new business; the risks and uncertainties associated with client interest in and purchases of new products and/or services; continued funding of U.S. government or other public sector projects, based on a change in spending patterns, implementation of spending cuts (sequestration) under the Budget Control Act of 2011, changes in budgetary priorities, or in the event of a priority need for funds, such as homeland security; government contract procurement (such as bid protest, small business set asides, loss of work due to organizational conflicts of interest, etc.) and termination risks; the results of government audits and reviews conducted by the Defense Contract Audit Agency, the Defense Contract Management Agency, or other governmental entities with cognizant oversight; individual business decisions of our clients; paradigm shifts in technology; competitive factors such as pricing pressures and/or competition to hire and retain employees (particularly those with security clearances); market speculation regarding our continued independence; material changes in laws or regulations applicable to our businesses, particularly in connection with (i) government contracts for services, (ii) outsourcing of activities that have been performed by the government, and (iii) competition for task orders under Government Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs) and/or schedule contracts with the General Services Administration; the ability to successfully integrate the operations of our recent and any future acquisitions; our own ability to achieve the objectives of near term or long range business plans; and other risks described in our SEC filings.

Overview

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is provided to enhance the understanding of, and should be read together with, our unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

We derived 93.7 percent and 93.5 percent of our revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively, from contracts with U.S. government agencies.  These were derived through both prime and subcontractor relationships.  We also provide services to state and local governments, commercial customers, and through our international operations, to non-U.S. government agencies.  We provide our services and solutions to our customers in the following market areas:

16

17

We continue to carefully follow federal budget, legislative and contracting trends and activities and evolve our strategies to take these into consideration.  Since March 2013, the federal government has been operating under sequestration required by the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA).  Under sequestration, constraints on discretionary expenditures have taken place each of the government’s fiscal years since 2013 and, unless the BCA is amended or repealed, will continue through the government’s Fiscal Year 2025.  At the end of October 2015, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA) was passed and signed into law, raising the discretionary spending caps under the BCA by $50 billion and $30 billion in the government’s Fiscal Years 2016 and 2017, respectively.  In December 2015, Congress passed and the President signed into law a $1.15 trillion Fiscal Year 2016 omnibus appropriations bill that kept the government operating until September 30, 2016. On September 29, 2016, a continuing resolution was signed into law by the President, keeping the government operating until December 9, 2016.  When Congress reconvenes following the November general election, it is expected to address the Fiscal Year 2017 budget and the funding of the government through September 2017.  We expect the impact of the above legislation and actions Congress will take on contracts and task orders we hold, and may receive, to continue throughout our FY17.

We are continuously reviewing our operations in an attempt to identify those programs that are potentially at risk from the consequences of sequestration beyond the coverage of the BBA so that we can make appropriate contingency plans, should that be necessary.  We are experiencing reduced funding on some of our programs, and may experience further reductions, but we do not expect the cancellation of any of our major programs.

We also continue to face some uncertainties due to the current general business environment, and we continue to see a number of protests of major contract awards and delays in government procurement activities.  In addition, many of our federal government contracts require us to employ personnel with security clearances, specific levels of education and specific past work experience.  Depending on the level of clearance, security clearances can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain and competition for skilled personnel in the information technology services industry is intense.  In addition, a shift of expenditures away from programs that we support could cause federal government agencies to reduce their purchases under contracts, to exercise their right to terminate contracts at any time without penalty, or to decide not to exercise options to renew contracts.  Additional factors that could affect our federal government contracting business include an increase in set-asides for small businesses and budgetary priorities limiting or delaying federal government spending in general.

18

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

Revenue. The table below sets forth revenue by customer type with related percentages of total revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively:

For the three months ended September 30, 2016, total revenue increased by 30.5 percent, or $250.8 million, compared to the same period a year ago.  This growth in revenue resulted primarily from the NSS acquisition completed February 1, 2016 and other recent acquisitions .  Revenue generated from the date a business is acquired through the first anniversary of that date is considered acquired revenue.  Excluding acquired revenue, organic revenue decreased by 1.3 percent primarily due to reduced customer requirements and government purchasing delays.

DoD revenue increased 27.4 percent, or $148.7 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the same period a year ago.  Excluding acquired revenue of $164.1 million, DoD revenue decreased by 2.8 percent primarily due to reduced customer requirements.  DoD revenue includes services provided to the U.S. Army, our largest customer, where our services focus on supporting readiness, tactical military intelligence, and communications systems.  DoD revenue also includes work with the U.S. Navy and other DoD agencies across all of our major service offerings.

Revenue from federal civilian agencies increased 39.2 percent, or $88.4 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the same period a year ago.  This increase was primarily attributable to the NSS acquisition for information technology support services.  The acquired revenue was $81.5 million while the organic revenue grew by $6.9 million or 3.0 percent.  Federal civilian agency revenue also includes services provided to non-DoD national intelligence agencies.

Commercial and other revenue increased 25.8 percent, or $13.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the same period a year ago, primarily from our international and domestic technology services and cyber security products.  This increase was attributable to increased product orders and managed services revenue from acquisitions.  Commercial revenue and other is derived from both international and domestic operations.  Of the total commercial and other revenue, international operations accounted for 51.1 percent, or $34.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to 68.7 percent or $36.8 million over the same period a year ago due to growth of managed services business from acquisitions. Domestic operations accounted for 48.9 percent or $32.9 million as compared to 31.3 percent or $16.7 million over those same periods due to increased technology and security product sales.

19

Income from Operations. The following table sets forth the relative percentage that certain items of expense and earnings bear to revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Income from operations for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was $69.7 million. This was an increase of $5.2 million, or 8.0 percent, from income from operations of $64.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. Our operating margin of 6.5 percent for the period ended September 30, 2016 decreased from 7.8 percent during the period ended September 30, 2015. This decrease was due to lower gross margin on certain contracts acquired with NSS and planned indirect cost increases.

As a percentage of revenue, direct costs were 67.8 percent and 65.4 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Direct costs include direct labor and other direct costs (ODCs), which include, among other costs, subcontracted labor and material purchases.  ODCs are common in our industry and may vary from period to period.  The single largest component of direct costs, direct labor was $334.9 million and $270.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  The increase in direct labor was primarily driven by the acquisition of NSS.  ODCs were $393.3 million and $267.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  The increase in ODCs was primarily driven by the acquisition of NSS and partially offset by reduced customer requirements.

Indirect costs and selling expenses include fringe benefits (attributable to both direct and indirect labor), marketing and bid and proposal costs, indirect labor, and other discretionary expenses.  As a percentage of revenue, indirect costs and selling expenses were 24.0 percent and 25.0 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  The increase in indirect costs and selling expenses was primarily due to the NSS acquisition, and also fringe benefits costs related to increased direct labor and incentive costs.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $3.3 million or 22.0 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the same period a year ago.  This increase was the result of additional intangible amortization and depreciation expense related to the NSS acquisition, partially offset by the run-off of amortization expense related to prior acquisitions.

Interest expense and other, net increased $3.3 million or 36.0 percent during the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the same period a year ago.  The increase primarily relates to interest on $550 million of additional indebtedness incurred to fund the acquisition of NSS.

The effective tax rate was 35.9 percent and 37.4 percent during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The effective tax rate during the three months ended September 30, 2016 was positively impacted by gains from the change in value of assets invested in corporate owned life insurance (COLI) policies. The effective tax rate during the three months ended September 30, 2015 were negatively impacted by losses from these policies.  If gains or losses on these COLI investments throughout the rest of the current fiscal year vary from our estimates, our effective tax rate will fluctuate in future quarters of the year ending June 30, 2017.  The tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was also favorably affected by the work opportunity tax credit benefit.

20

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2016, the aggregate amount of committed financing under our Credit Facility was $1,981.3 million, which included an $850.0 million revolving credit facility, and a $1,131.3 million term loan.  The Credit Facility matures on June 1, 2020.

The Revolving Facility is a secured facility that permits continuously renewable borrowings and has subfacilities of $100.0 million for same-day swing line borrowings and $25.0 million for stand-by letters of credit.  As of September 30, 2016, we had $395.0 million outstanding under the Revolving Facility, no borrowings on the swing line and an outstanding letter of credit of $0.4 million.

The Term Loan is a five-year secured facility under which principal payments are due in quarterly installments of $13.5 million through June 30, 2018 and $27.0 million thereafter until the balance is due in full on June 1, 2020.  As of September 30, 2016, $1,019.3 million was outstanding under the Term Loan.

At any time and so long as no default has occurred, we have the right to increase the Term Loan or Revolving Facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to the greater of $400.0 million or an amount subject to 2.75 times secured leverage, calculated assuming the Revolving Facility is fully drawn, with applicable lender approvals.

The interest rates applicable to loans under the Credit Facility are floating interest rates that, at our option, equal a base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin based upon our consolidated total leverage ratio.

The Credit Facility requires us to comply with certain financial covenants, including a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.  The Credit Facility also includes customary negative covenants restricting or limiting our ability to guarantee or incur additional indebtedness, grant liens or other security interests to third parties, make loans or investments, transfer assets, declare dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock or make other distributions, prepay subordinated indebtedness and engage in mergers, acquisitions or other business combinations, in each case except as expressly permitted under the Credit Facility.  Since the inception of the Credit Facility, we have been in compliance with all of the financial covenants.  A majority of our assets serve as collateral under the Credit Facility.

Cash and cash equivalents were $49.7 million and $49.1 million as of September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016, respectively. Our operating cash flow was $57.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $79.3 million for the same period a year ago. The year-over-year decrease is primarily due to the timing of vendor payables. Days-sales outstanding (DSO) was 59 days at September 30, 2016, compared to 58 days at September 30, 2015.

Cash provided by investing activities was $4.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016 while cash used in investing activities was $8.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015.  For the three months ended September 30, 2016 we received a net working capital refund from our NSS acquisition of $13.6 million.  We also received $4.7 million of capital contributions relating to our joint ventures.  We had no similar proceeds for the three months ended September 30, 2015.  Purchases of office and computer related equipment were $11.2 million and $4.5 million as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. This increase in purchases was primarily related to the renovation of our leased facility in Chantilly, Virginia, which will continue throughout FY17.

Cash flows used in financing activities were $61.2 and $77.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively.  During the three months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015 we had net payments under our credit facility of $58.5 million and $74.7 million, respectively.

We believe that the combination of internally generated funds, available bank borrowings and cash and cash equivalents on hand will provide the required liquidity and capital resources necessary to fund on-going operations, customary capital expenditures, debt service obligations, and other working capital requirements over the next twelve months.  We may in the future seek to borrow additional amounts under a long-term debt security.  Over the longer term, our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations necessary to fulfill the obligations under the Credit Facility and any other indebtedness we may incur will depend on our future financial performance which will be affected by many factors outside of our control, including worldwide economic and financial market conditions.

21

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

We use off-balance sheet arrangements to finance the lease of operating facilities. We have financed the use of all of our current office and warehouse facilities through operating leases. Operating leases are also used to finance the use of computers, servers, phone systems, motor vehicles in the U.K., and to a lesser extent, other fixed assets, such as furnishings, that are obtained in connection with business acquisitions. We generally assume the lease rights and obligations of companies acquired in business combinations and continue financing equipment under operating leases until the end of the lease term following the acquisition date. We generally do not finance capital expenditures with operating leases, but instead finance such purchases with available cash balances. For additional information regarding our operating lease commitments, see Note 14 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2016. The Credit Facility provides for stand-by letters of credit aggregating up to $25.0 million that reduce the funds available under the Revolving Facility when issued. As of September 30, 2016, we had an outstanding letter of credit of $0.4 million. We have no other material off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The interest rates on both the Term Loan and the Revolving Facility are affected by changes in market interest rates.  We have the ability to manage these fluctuations in part through interest rate hedging alternatives in the form of interest rate swaps.  We have entered into floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $900 million related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness. All remaining balances under our Term Loan, and any additional amounts that may be borrowed under our Revolving Facility, are currently subject to interest rate fluctuations. With every one percent fluctuation in the applicable interest rates, interest expense on our variable rate debt for the three months ended September 30, 2016 would have fluctuated by approximately $1.8 million.

Approximately 3.2 percent and 4.5 percent of our total revenue in three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, was derived from our international operations headquartered in the U.K. Our practice in our international operations is to negotiate contracts in the same currency in which the predominant expenses are incurred, thereby mitigating the exposure to foreign currency exchange fluctuations. It is not possible to accomplish this in all cases; thus, there is some risk that profits will be affected by foreign currency exchange fluctuations. As of September 30, 2016, we held a combination of euros and pounds sterling in the U.K. and in the Netherlands equivalent to approximately $20.6 million. This allows us to better utilize our cash resources on behalf of our foreign subsidiaries, thereby mitigating foreign currency conversion risks.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the three month period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The effectiveness of a system of disclosure controls and procedures is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitation, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of internal controls, and fraud.  Due to such inherent limitations, there can be only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that any system of disclosure controls and procedures will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud, or in making all material information known in a timely manner to appropriate levels of management.

Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were operating and effective at September 30, 2016.

The Company reports that no changes in its internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2016.

22

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

Al Shimari, et al. v. L-3 Services, Inc. et al.

Reference is made to Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2016 for the most recently filed information concerning the suit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.  The lawsuit names CACI International Inc, CACI Premier Technology, Inc. and former CACI employee Timothy Dugan as Defendants, along with L-3 Services, Inc.  Plaintiffs seek, inter alia, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees.

Since the filing of Registrant’s report described above, on remand, Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc. moved to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims based upon the political question doctrine.  On June 18, 2015, the Court issued an Order granting Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc.’s motion to dismiss, and on June 26, 2015 entered a final judgment in favor of Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc.

On July 23, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal of the district court’s June 2015 decision.  On October 21, 2016, the Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the District Court’s judgment with instructions for the District Court to make further determinations regarding the political question doctrine.

Abbass, et al v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc. and CACI International Inc, Case No. 1:13CV1186-LMB/JFA (EDVA)

Reference is made to Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2016 for the most recently filed information concerning the suit filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.  The lawsuit names CACI International Inc and CACI Premier Technology, Inc. as Defendants.  Plaintiffs seeks, inter alia, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees.

Since the filing of Registrant’s report described above, the case remains stayed pending the outcome in the Al Shimari appeal.

We are vigorously defending the above-described legal proceedings, and, based on our present knowledge of the facts, believe the lawsuits are completely without merit.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Reference is made to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2016. There have been no material changes from the risk factors described in that report.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table provides certain information with respect to our purchases of shares of CACI International Inc’s common stock:

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5.  Other Information

None

23

Item 6.  Exhibits

24

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

25