UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

Commission file number: 000-04892

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

3320 Woodrow Wilson Avenue, Jackson, Mississippi 39209
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(601) 948-6813
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (  )

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

The aggregate market value, as reported by the NASDAQ National Market, of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, held by non-affiliates at November 27, 2004, which was the date of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $161,898,900.

As of August 3, 2005, 21,148,291 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, and 2,400,000 shares of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value, were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The information called for by Part III of the form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference from the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I

Part II

Part III

Part IV

2

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

        Our Business

        Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Company”) is the largest producer and marketer of shell eggs in the United States. In fiscal year 2005, we sold approximately 575 million dozen shell eggs, which represented about 13% of domestic shell egg consumption in the United States. Our total flock, which is comprised of approximately 18 million layers and 4 million pullets and breeders, is the largest in the United States. Layers are mature female chickens, pullets are young female chickens usually under 20 weeks of age, and breeders are male or female chickens used to produce fertile eggs to be hatched for egg production flocks. Our primary business is the production, grading, packaging, marketing and distribution of shell eggs. We sell the majority of our shell eggs in 28 states, primarily in the southwestern, southeastern, mid-western and mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. We market our shell eggs through our extensive distribution network to a diverse group of customers, including national and regional grocery store chains, club stores, foodservice distributors and egg product manufacturers. The strength of our position is evidenced by the fact that we have the largest market share in the grocery segment for shell eggs and we sell shell eggs to 9 of the 10 largest food retailers in the United States.

        We are also the largest producer and marketer of value-added specialty shell eggs in the United States. Specialty shell eggs include reduced cholesterol, cage free and organic eggs and are a rapidly growing segment of the market. In fiscal 2005, specialty shell eggs were estimated to represent approximately 14% of our shell egg dollar sales. Retail prices for specialty eggs are higher than standard shell eggs due to consumer willingness to pay for the increased benefits from those products. We market our specialty shell eggs under two distinct brands: Egg-Land’s Best(TM) and Farmhouse(TM). We own a 20% equity interest in Egg-Land’s Best, Inc., which markets the leading brand in the specialty shell egg segment. We have exclusive license agreements to market and distribute Egg-Land’s Best(TM) specialty shell eggs in major metropolitan areas, including New York City, and a number of states in the southeast and southwest. We market cage free eggs under our trademarked Farmhouse brand and distribute those shell eggs across the southeast and southwest regions of the United States. We also produce market and distribute private label specialty shell eggs to several customers. Sales of specialty shell eggs accounted for approximately 6.5% of our total shell egg dozen volume in fiscal 2005 and 5.6% for fiscal 2004.

        We are also a leader in industry consolidation. Since 1989, we have completed ten acquisitions ranging in size from 600,000 layers to 7.5 million layers. On July 28, 2005, we entered into an agreement for the acquisition of the operations of Hillandale Farms, Inc. and Hillandale Farms of Florida, Inc. Despite a market that has been characterized by increasing consolidation, the shell egg production industry remains highly fragmented. There are currently 61 producers who each own more than one million layers and the ten largest producers own approximately 40% of total industry layers. We believe industry consolidation will continue and we plan to capitalize on opportunities as they arise.

        Hillandale Acquisition

        We have entered into an Agreement to Form a Limited Liability Company, Transfer Assets Thereto, and Purchase Units of Membership Therein, dated July 28, 2005, with Hillandale Farms, Inc. and Hillandale Farms of Florida, Inc. (together, “Hillandale”), and the Hillandale shareholders (the “Agreement”). Pursuant to the Agreement, we will acquire Hillandale’s egg production and marketing operations. Hillandale’s production facilities are principally located in Florida, where it began operations over 30 years ago. Hillandale has a strong marketing presence in Florida, Georgia and Alabama. When completed, the Hillandale acquisition is expected to increase our current egg production capacity by approximately 30%.

        Under the terms of the Agreement, the Hillandale assets to be acquired and liabilities to be assumed by us will be transferred to a new Florida limited liability company named Hillandale, LLC. The two Hillandale companies will be the initial members of Hillandale, LLC, for formation purposes. Upon the completion of an evaluation of the assets and liabilities to be acquired and assumed by us, as agreed to by the parties to the Agreement, we will purchase 51% of the Units of Membership in Hillandale, LLC. The remaining 49% of the Units of Membership in Hillandale, LLC, are to be acquired in essentially equal annual installments over a four-year period, with the purchase price of the units equal to their book value as calculated in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. The acquisition will be made for cash, from our available funds, and borrowings to the extent necessary. We will acquire our initial 51% interest in Hillandale, LLC, at a presently estimated cost of approximately $30 to $35 million, subject to adjustment upwards or downwards, based upon the valuations agreed upon by the parties to the Agreement.

3

        During 2004, Hillandale sold approximately 129.3 million dozen eggs produced by its flock of layers at eight production facilities located in Florida and Alabama, including approximately 3.9 million dozen produced under contract arrangements with others. Like us, Hillandale is a fully integrated producer with its own feed mills and distribution facilities.

        Our Corporate Information

        We were incorporated in Delaware in 1969. Our principal executive office is located at 3320 Woodrow Wilson Drive, Jackson, Mississippi 39209. The telephone number of our principal executive office is (601) 948-6813. We maintain a website at www.calmainefoods.com where general information about our business is available. The information contained in our website is not a part of this document. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, Forms 3 and 4, and all amendments to those reports are available, free of charge, through our web site as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with the SEC. Information concerning corporate governance matters is also available on the website.

        Our Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “CALM”. On May 27, 2005, the last sale price of our Common Stock was $6.76 per share. Our fiscal year 2005 ended May 28, 2005 and the first three fiscal quarters of fiscal 2005 ended August 28, 2004, November 27, 2004 and February 26, 2005. All references to a fiscal year means our fiscal year and all references to a year mean a calendar year.

        We have adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics for Directors, Officers and Employees, including the chief executive and principal financial and accounting officers of the Company. We will provide a copy of the code free of charge to any person that requests a copy by writing to:

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
P.O. Box 2960
Jackson, Mississippi 39207
Attn.: Investor Relations

Requests can be made by phone at (601) 948-6813

        A copy is also available at our website www.calmainefoods.com. Information contained on our website is not a part of this report.

IMPORTANT FACTORS RELATING TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This report contains numerous forward-looking statements relating to the Company’s shell egg business, including estimated production data, expected operating schedules, expected capital costs and other operating data. Such forward-looking statements are identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “hopes,” “may,” “should,” “plan,” “projected,” “contemplates,” “anticipates” or similar words. Actual production, operating schedules, results of operations and other projections and estimates could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements include (i) the risk factors set forth below under this Item 1, (ii) the risks and hazards inherent in the shell egg business (including disease, pests, and weather conditions), (iii) changes in the market prices of shell eggs, and (iv) changes that could result from the Company’s future acquisition of new flocks or businesses. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

4

        Industry Background

         The United States Department of Agriculture reported that in 2003 the wholesale shell egg industry was a $4.5 billion market. Shell eggs are a staple food product and 94% of US homes buy shell eggs according to the 2003 Progressive Grocer Consumer Expenditure Study. Based on historical consumption trends, demand for shell eggs increases in line with overall population growth, averaging an increase of about 1% per year. According to U.S. Department of Agriculture reports, since 1999, annual per capita consumption in the United States has varied between 250 and 256 eggs. In 2004, per capita consumption in the United States was 253 eggs, or approximately five eggs per person per week.

        Prices for Shell Eggs

        Shell egg prices are a critical component of profitability in the industry. Over 90% of all shell eggs sold in the United States in the retail and foodservice channels are sold at prices related to the Urner Barry wholesale quotation for shell eggs. For fiscal 2005, wholesale shell egg prices averaged 71.9 cents per dozen compared to an average of 84.3 cents per dozen for fiscal years 2002 to 2004. The current price environment is weak due to moderate demand for shell eggs and a slight oversupply of eggs.

        Factors currently influencing demand:

        Factors currently influencing supply:

        Feed Costs for Shell Egg Production

        Feed is a primary cost component in the production of shell eggs and represents over one-half of industry production costs. Most shell egg processors are vertically integrated; manufacturing the majority of the feed they require themselves. Although feed ingredients are available from a number of sources, prices for ingredients can fluctuate and can be affected by weather and by various supply and demand factors. Current prices for corn and soybeans, essential feed ingredients, are favorable this year compared to with last year. However, there are wide swings in corn and soybean prices because of dry conditions in the Midwest and widely varying forecast projections for the 2005 fall crop and harvest season in September and October.

5

        Growth Strategy and Acquisitions

        For many years, we have pursued a growth strategy focused on the acquisition of existing shell egg production and processing facilities, as well as the construction of new and more efficient facilities. Since the beginning of fiscal 1989, we have completed ten acquisitions, and built seven new “in-line” shell egg production and processing facilities and one pullet growing facility, adding 8 million layers and 1.5 million growing pullets to our capacity. Each of the new shell egg production facilities generally provides for the processing of approximately 400 cases of shell eggs, or 12,000 dozen eggs, per hour. These increases in capacity have been accompanied by the retirement of older and less efficient facilities and a reduction in eggs produced by contract producers. The “in-line” facilities result in the gathering, grading and packaging of shell eggs by less labor-intensive, more efficient, mechanical means.

        As a result of our strategy, our total flock, including pullets, layers and breeders, has increased from approximately 6.8 million at May 28, 1988 to an average of approximately 23.9 million for each of the past five fiscal years. Also, the number of dozens of shell eggs sold has increased from approximately 117 million in the fiscal year ended May 28, 1988 to an average of approximately 571.6 million over the past five fiscal years. Net sales amounted to $375.3 million in fiscal 2005 compared to net sales of $69.9 million in fiscal 1988.

        The completion of our acquisition of the Hillandale operations will significantly increase our production and processing facilities, and enhance our market penetration in the southeastern part of the country. With our investment in Hillandale, LLC, our total flock of pullets, layers and breeders will increase from 22.3 million at May 28, 2005, to approximately 29.5 million. Also, our egg production and processing facilities will expand through our acquisition of Hillandale’s production operations located in Alabama and Florida. We anticipate that, in the normal course, members of Hillandale’s present management will be integrated with our management. A copy of the Agreement, as incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K Current Report dated July 28, 2005, is included as an exhibit to this Form 10-K Annual Report. Financial statements of Hillandale, as required under Rules of the SEC, will be provided in Form 8-K current report to be filed by us at a later date.

        We propose to continue to pursue opportunities for the acquisition of other companies engaged in the production and sale of shell eggs. We will continue to evaluate and selectively pursue acquisitions that will expand our shell egg production capabilities in existing markets and broaden our geographic reach. We have extensive experience identifying, valuing, executing and integrating acquisitions and we intend to leverage that experience in the evaluation and execution of future acquisitions. We will seek to acquire regional shell egg businesses that have significant market share and long-standing customer relationships. We believe that enhancing our national presence will help us further strengthen our relationships with existing customers which have operations across the United States.

        Through exclusive license agreements with Egg-Land’s Best, Inc. in several key territories and our trademarked Farmhouse brand, we are the leading producer and marketer of value-added specialty shell eggs. We also produce, market and distribute private label specialty shell eggs to several customers. Since selling prices of specialty shell eggs are not related to the generic shell egg market, we believe that growing our specialty eggs business will enhance the stability of our margins. We expect that the price of specialty eggs will remain at a premium to regular shell eggs. We intend to pursue acquisitions that may expand our specialty shell egg production.

        Federal anti-trust laws require regulatory approval of acquisitions that exceed certain threshold levels of significance. Also, we are subject to federal and state laws generally prohibiting anti-competitive conduct. Because the shell egg production and distribution industry is so fragmented, we believe that our sales of shell eggs during its last fiscal year represented only approximately 13% of domestic shell egg sales notwithstanding that we are the largest producer and distributor of shell eggs in the United States based on independently prepared industry statistics. We believe that regulatory approval of any future acquisitions either will not be required, or, if required, that such approvals will be obtained.

6

        The construction of new, more efficient production and processing facilities is an integral part of our growth strategy. Any such construction will require compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, including the receipt of permits that could cause schedule delays, although we have not experienced any significant delays in the past.

        Shell Eggs *

        Production. Our operations are fully integrated. At our facilities, we hatch chicks, grow pullets, manufacture feed and produce and distribute shell eggs. Company-owned facilities accounted for approximately 88% of our total fiscal 2005 egg production, with the balance attributable to contract producers used by us. Under arrangements with our contract producers, we own the entire flock, furnish all feed and supplies, own the shell eggs produced and assume all market risks. The contract producers own their facilities and are paid a fee based on production with incentives for performance.

        The commercial production of shell eggs requires a source of baby chicks for laying flock replacement. We produce approximately 98% of our chicks in our own hatcheries and obtain the balance from commercial sources. We own breeder facilities producing 13 million pullet chicks per year in a computer-controlled environment. These pullets are distributed to 19 state-of-the-art laying operations around the southwestern, southeastern, mid-western and mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. The facilities produce an average of 13 million shell eggs per day and process the shell eggs through grading and packaging without handling by human hands. We have spent a cumulative total of $40 million over the past five years upgrading our facilities with the most advanced equipment and technology available in our industry. We believe our focus on automation throughout the supply chain enables us to be a low cost supplier in all the markets in which we compete.

        Feed for the laying flocks is produced by Company-owned and operated mills located in the southwestern, southeastern, mid-western and mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. All ingredients necessary for feed production are readily available in the open market and most are purchased centrally from Jackson, Mississippi. Approximately 97% of the feed for our flocks is manufactured at feed mills owned and operated by us. Poultry feed is formulated using a computer model to determine the least-cost ration to meet the nutritional needs of the flocks. Although most feed ingredients are purchased on an as-needed basis, from time-to-time, when deemed advantageous, we purchase ingredients in advance with a delayed delivery of several weeks or a few months.

        Feed cost represents the largest element of our farm egg production cost, ranging from 53% to 57% of total cost in the last five years, or an average of approximately 55%. Although feed ingredients are available from a number of sources, we have little, if any, control over the prices of the ingredients we purchase, which are affected by weather and by various supply and demand factors. Increases in feed costs not accompanied by increases in the selling price of eggs can have a material adverse effect on the results of our operations. However, higher feed costs may encourage producers to reduce production, possibly resulting in higher egg prices. Alternatively, low feed costs can encourage industry overproduction, possibly resulting in lower egg prices. Historically, we have tended to have higher profit margins when feed costs are higher. However, this may not be the case in the future.

        After the eggs are produced, they are graded and packaged. Substantially all of our farms have modern “in-line” facilities that mechanically gather, grade and package the eggs produced. The increased use of in-line facilities has generated significant cost savings as compared to the cost of eggs produced from non-in-line facilities. In addition to greater efficiency, the in-line facilities produce a higher percentage of grade A eggs, which sell at higher prices. Eggs produced on farms owned by contractors are brought to our processing plants where they are graded and packaged. Since shell eggs are perishable, we maintain very low shell egg inventories, usually consisting of approximately four days of production.

        * The business and industry discussion set forth in this section and elsewhere in this Form 10-K Annual Report also is generally applicable to Hillandale. However, information relating to our chick and layer population, production facilities, number of eggs produced, number of employees, properties, and other such facts, does not give effect to the Hillandale acquisition.

7

        Our egg production activities are subject to risks inherent in the agriculture industry, such as weather conditions and disease factors. These risks are not within our control and could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Also, the marketability of our shell eggs is subject to risks such as possible changes in food consumption opinions and practices reflecting perceived health concerns.

        We operate in a cyclical industry with total demand that is generally level and a product that is price-inelastic. Thus, small increases in production or decreases in demand can have a large adverse effect on prices and vice-versa. However, economic conditions in the egg industry are expected to exhibit less cyclicality in the future. The industry is concentrating into fewer but stronger hands, which should help lessen the extreme cyclicality of the past.

        Marketing. Of the 575 million dozen shell eggs sold by us in the fiscal year ended May 28, 2005, 435 million were produced by our flocks.

        We sell our shell eggs to a diverse group of customers, including national and local grocery store chains, club stores, foodservice distributors and egg product manufacturers. We utilize electronic ordering and invoicing systems that enable us to manage inventory for certain of our customers. Our top 10 customers accounted for an aggregate of 64.7% of net sales in the fiscal 2005 and 58.4% of net sales for fiscal 2004. One customer, H.E. Butt Grocery Co., accounted for 12.1% of net sales during fiscal 2005 and 11.9% of net sales for fiscal 2004, and two affiliated customers, Wal-Mart Stores and Sam’s Clubs, on a combined basis, accounted for 30.9% of net sales during fiscal 2005 and 26.8% of net sales for fiscal 2004.

        The majority of eggs sold are merchandised on a daily or short-term basis. Most sales to established accounts are on open account with terms ranging from seven to 30 days. Although we have established long-term relationships with many of our customers, they are free to acquire shell eggs from other sources.

        The shell eggs we sell are either delivered by us to our customers’ warehouses and facilities with our own fleet of owned or contracted delivery trucks or are picked up by our customers at our warehouses.

        We sell our shell eggs at prices generally related to independently quoted wholesale market prices. Wholesale prices are subject to wide fluctuations. The prices of our shell eggs reflect fluctuations in the quoted market, and the results of our shell egg operations are materially affected by changes in market quotations. Egg prices reflect a number of economic conditions, such as the supply of eggs and the level of demand, which, in turn, are influenced by a number of factors that we cannot control. No representation can be made as to the future level of prices.

        According to U.S. Department of Agriculture reports, since 1999, annual per capita consumption in the United States has varied between 250 and 256 eggs. While we believe that increased fast food restaurant consumption, high protein diet trends, reduced egg cholesterol levels and industry advertising campaigns may result in a continuance of the recent increases in current per capita egg consumption levels, no assurance can be given that per capita consumption will not decline in the future.

        We sell the majority of our shell eggs in approximately 28 states across the southwestern, southeastern, mid-western and mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. We are a major factor in egg marketing in a majority of these states. Many states in our market area are egg deficit regions; that is, production of fresh shell eggs is less than total consumption. Competition from other producers in specific market areas is generally based on price, service, and quality of product. Strong competition exists in each of our markets.

        Seasonality. Shell eggs are perishable. Consequently, we maintain very low shell egg inventories, usually consisting of approximately four days of production. Retail sales of shell eggs are greatest during the fall and winter months and lowest during the summer months. Prices for shell eggs fluctuate in response to seasonal demand factors and a natural increase in egg production during the spring and early summer. We generally experience lower sales and net income in our fourth and first fiscal quarters ending in May and August, respectively. During the past ten years, eight of our first quarters and five of our fourth quarters have resulted in net operating losses.

8

        Specialty Eggs. We also produce specialty eggs such as Egg-Land’s Best™ and Farmhouse eggs. Egg-Land’s Best™ eggs are patented eggs that are believed by its developers, based on scientific studies, to cause no increase in serum cholesterol when eaten as part of a low fat diet. We produce and process Egg-Land’s Best™ eggs, under license from Egg-Land’s Best, Inc. (“EB”), at our existing facilities, under EB guidelines. The product is marketed to our established base of customers at prices that reflect a premium over ordinary shell eggs. Egg-Land’s Best™ eggs accounted for approximately 11.0% of our net sales in fiscal 2005. Farmhouse brand eggs are produced at our facilities by hens that are not caged, and are provided with a diet of natural grains and drinking water that is free of hormones or other chemical additives. Farmhouse eggs accounted for 2.4% of our net sales in fiscal 2005. They are intended to meet the demands of consumers who are sensitive to environmental and animal welfare issues.

        Competition. The production, processing, and distribution of shell eggs is an intensely competitive business, which, traditionally, has attracted large numbers of producers. Shell egg competition is generally based on price, service, and quality of production. Although we are the largest combined producer, processor, and distributor of shell eggs in the United States, we do not occupy a controlling market position in any area where our eggs are sold.

        While the shell egg industry remains highly fragmented, it has been characterized by a growing concentration of producers. In 2004, 61 producers with one million or more layers owned 84% of the 287 million total U.S. layers, compared with the 56 producers with one million or more layers owning 64% of the 232 million total U.S. layers in 1990, and 61 producers with one million or more layers owning 56% of the 248.0 million total U.S. layers in 1985. We believe that a continuation of that concentration trend may result in the reduced cyclicality of shell egg prices, but no assurance can be given in that regard. A continuation of this trend could also create greater competition among fewer producers.

         Patents and Tradenames. We own the trade names Farmhouse, Rio Grande and Sunups. We do not own any patents or proprietary technologies. We produce and market Egg-Land’s Best(TM) eggs under license agreements with EB. We own a 20% equity interest in EB.

         Government Regulation. Our facilities and operations are subject to regulation by various federal, state and local agencies, including, but not limited to, the FDA, the USDA, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and corresponding state agencies. The applicable regulations relate to grading, quality control, labeling, sanitary control and waste disposal. Our shell egg facilities are subject to periodic USDA inspections. Our feed production facilities are subject to FDA regulation and inspections. In addition, we maintain our own inspection program to assure compliance with our own standards and customer specifications. We do not know of any major capital expenditures necessary to comply with such statutes and regulations; however, there can be no assurance that we will not be required to incur significant costs for compliance with such statutes and regulations in the future.

         Environmental Regulation. Our operations and facilities are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, the generation, storage, handling, use, transportation, disposal and remediation of hazardous materials. Under these laws and regulations, we are also required to obtain permits from governmental authorities, including, but not limited to, wastewater discharge permits. We have made and will continue to make capital and other expenditures relating to compliance with existing environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and permits. We do not currently know of any major capital expenditures necessary to comply with such laws and regulations; however, because environmental, health and safety laws and regulations are becoming increasingly more stringent, including those relating to animal wastes and wastewater discharges, there can be no assurance that we will not be required to incur significant costs for compliance with such laws and regulations in the future. In addition, under certain circumstances, we may incur costs associated with our contract producers’ failure to comply with laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations.

9

        Employees. As of May 28, 2005, we had a total of approximately 1,400 employees of whom 1,270 worked in egg production, processing and marketing, 80 were engaged in feed mill operations and 50 were administrative employees, including officers, at our executive offices. Approximately 5% of our personnel are part-time. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relations with employees to be good.

        Risk factors

        We are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including the following:

         Market prices of wholesale shell eggs are volatile and changes in these prices and costs can adversely impact our results of operations.

        Our operating results are significantly affected by wholesale shell egg market prices, which fluctuate widely and are outside of our control. Small increases in production or small decreases in demand can have a large adverse effect on shell egg prices. Shell egg prices have experienced an upward trend since 2002 and rose to historical highs in late 2003 and early 2004. In the early fall of 2004, the demand trend related to the popular diets faded dramatically. During this time of increased demand, the egg industry had geared up to produce more eggs to meet the demand. During the past nine to twelve months, the industry has experienced an oversupply of eggs resulting in lower egg prices. In March 2005, the egg industry took action to reduce the size of the laying flocks. Current U.S. Department of Agriculture statistics indicate a reduced flock size that is now more in line with current demand. There can be no assurance that shell egg prices will remain at or near current levels and that the supply of shell eggs will remain level in the future.

        Retail sales of shell eggs are greatest during the fall and winter months and lowest during the summer months. Prices for shell eggs fluctuate in response to seasonal factors and a natural increase in shell egg production during the spring and early summer. Shell egg prices tend to increase with the start of the school year and are highest prior to holiday periods, particularly Thanksgiving, Christmas and Easter. Consequently, we generally experience lower sales and net income in our first and fourth fiscal quarters ending in August and May, respectively. As a result of these seasonal and quarterly fluctuations, comparisons of our sales and operating results between different quarters within a single fiscal year are not necessarily meaningful comparisons.

         Changes in consumer demand for shell eggs can negatively impact our business.

        As discussed above, demand for shell eggs has increased in recent years as a result of a number of factors. We believe that increased fast food restaurant consumption, favorable reports from the medical community regarding the health benefits of shell eggs, reduced shell egg cholesterol levels, high protein diet trends and industry advertising campaigns have all contributed to the increase in shell egg demand. However, there can be no assurance that the demand for shell eggs will not decline in the future. Adverse publicity relating to health concerns and changes in the perception of the nutritional value of shell eggs, as well as movement away from high protein diets, could adversely affect demand for shell eggs, which would have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations and financial condition.

         Feed costs are volatile and changes in these costs can adversely impact our results of operations.

        Feed costs represent the largest element of our shell egg production cost, ranging from 53% to 57% of total annual cost in each of the last five fiscal years. Although feed ingredients are available from a number of sources, we have little, if any, control over the prices of the ingredients that we purchase, which are affected by various demand and supply factors and have experienced significant fluctuations in the past. Prices for corn and soybeans, essential feed ingredients, are favorable this year compared to with last year. However, there are wide swings in corn and soybean prices because of dry conditions in the Midwest and widely varying forecast projections for the 2005 fall crop and harvest season in September and October. Increases in feed costs which are not accompanied by increases in the selling price of shell eggs will have a material adverse effect on the results of our operations.

10

         Due to the cyclical nature of our business, our financial results from year to year may fluctuate.

        The shell egg industry has traditionally been subject to periods of high profitability followed by periods of significant loss. In the past, during periods of high profitability, shell egg producers have tended to increase the number of layers in production with a resulting increase in the supply of shell eggs, which generally has caused a drop in shell egg prices until supply and demand return to balance. As a result, our financial results from year to year may vary significantly.

         We purchase approximately 25% of the shell eggs we sell from outside producers and our ability to obtain such eggs at prices and in quantities acceptable to us could fluctuate.

        We produce approximately 75% of the total number of shell eggs sold by us and purchase the remaining amount from outside producers. As the wholesale price for shell eggs increases, our cost to acquire shell eggs from outside producers also increases. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to acquire shell eggs from outside producers in quantities and prices that are satisfactory and our inability to do so may have a material adverse affect on our business and profitability.

        Our acquisition growth strategy subjects us to various risks.

        We plan to pursue a growth strategy which includes acquisitions of other companies engaged in the production and sale of shell eggs. Acquisitions can require capital resources and divert management’s attention from our existing business. Acquisitions also entail an inherent risk that we could become subject to contingent or other liabilities, including liabilities arising from events or conduct prior to our acquisition of a business that were not known to us at the time of acquisition. We may also incur significantly greater expenditures in integrating an acquired business than we had anticipated at the time of its purchase. We cannot assure you that we:

        No assurance can be given that companies acquired by us in the future will contribute positively to our results of operations or financial condition. In addition, federal anti-trust laws require regulatory approval of acquisitions that exceed certain threshold levels of significance.

        The consideration we pay in connection with any acquisition also affects our financial results. If we pay cash, we could be required to use a portion of our available cash to consummate the acquisition. To the extent we issue shares of our Common Stock, existing stockholders may be diluted. In addition, acquisitions may result in the incurrence of debt.

        We presently have no understandings or agreements with respect to any acquisitions, other than the agreement we have entered into for the Hillandale acquisition.

         Our largest customers have historically accounted for a significant portion of our net sales volume. Accordingly, our business may be adversely affected by the loss of, or reduced purchases by, one or more of our large customers.

        For the fiscal years ended May 28, 2005, and May 29, 2004, one customer, H.E. Butt Grocery Co., accounted for 12.1% of our net sales and 11.9% of our net sales, respectively, and two affiliated customers, Wal-Mart Stores and Sam’s Clubs, on a combined basis, accounted for 30.8% and 26.8% of our net sales, respectively. Our top 10 customers accounted for 64.7% and 58.4% of net sales during those periods. Although we have established long-term relationships with many of our customers, we do not have contractual relationships with any of our major customers for the sale of our shell eggs. If, for any reason, one or more of our larger customers were to purchase significantly less of our shell eggs in the future or were to terminate their purchases from us, and we are not able to sell our shell eggs to new customers at comparable levels, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

11

         Failure to comply with applicable governmental regulations, including environmental regulations, could harm our operating results, financial condition and reputation.

        We are subject to federal and state regulations relating to grading, quality control, labeling, sanitary control and waste disposal. As a fully-integrated shell egg producer, our shell egg facilities are subject to United States Department of Agriculture, the USDA, and Food and Drug Administration, the FDA, regulation and various state and local health and agricultural agencies. Our shell egg processing facilities are subject to periodic USDA inspections. Our feed production facilities are subject to FDA regulation and inspections.

        Our operations and facilities are also subject to various federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations governing, among other things, the generation, storage, handling, use, transportation, disposal and remediation of hazardous materials. Under these laws and regulations, we are also required to obtain permits from governmental authorities, including, but not limited to wastewater discharge permits.

        If we fail to comply with any applicable law or regulation or permit, or fail to obtain any necessary permits, we could be subject to significant fines and penalties or other sanctions, our reputation could be harmed and our operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, because these laws and regulations are becoming increasingly more stringent, there can be no assurances that we will not be required to incur significant costs for compliance with such laws and regulations in the future.

        Our business is highly competitive.

        The production and sale of fresh shell eggs, which have accounted for virtually all of our net sales in recent years, is intensely competitive. We compete with a large number of competitors that may prove to be more successful than we are in marketing and selling shell eggs. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully with any or all of these companies. In addition, increased competition could result in price reductions, greater cyclicality, reduced margins and loss of market share, which would negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

         Pressure from animal rights groups regarding the treatment of animals may subject us to additional costs to conform our practices to comply with developing standards or subject us to marketing costs to defend challenges to our current practices and protect our image with our customers.

        We and many of our customers are facing pressure from animal rights groups, such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, to require that any companies that supply food products operate their business in a manner that treats animals in conformity with certain standards developed by these animal rights groups. As a result, we are changing our operating procedures with respect to our flock of hens to meet some or all of these treatment standards. The treatment standards require, among other things, that we provide increased cage space for our hens and modify beak trimming and forced molting practices (the act of putting chickens into a regeneration cycle). Changing our procedures and infrastructure to conform to these guidelines has resulted and will continue to result in additional costs to our internal production of shell eggs, including cost increases from housing and feeding the increased flock population resulting from the modification of molting practices, and the cost for us to purchase shell eggs from our outside suppliers. While some of these increased costs have been passed on to our customers, we cannot assure you that we can continue to pass on these costs, or any additional costs we will face, in the future.

         We are dependent on our management team, and the loss of any key member of this team may adversely affect the implementation of our business plan in a timely manner.

        Our success depends largely upon the continued services of our senior management team, including Fred R. Adams, Jr., our chairman and chief executive officer. The loss or interruption of Mr. Adams’ services or those of one or more of our other executive officers could adversely affect our ability to manage our operations effectively and/or pursue our growth strategy. We have not entered into any employment or non-compete agreements with any of our executive officers nor do we carry any key-man life insurance on any such persons.

12

        Agricultural risks could harm our business.

        Our shell egg production activities are subject to a variety of agricultural risks. Unusual or extreme weather conditions, disease and pests can materially and adversely affect the quality and quantity of shell eggs we produce and distribute. If a substantial portion of our production facilities are affected by any of these factors in any given quarter or year, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

        We are controlled by a principal stockholder.

         Fred R. Adams, Jr., our chairman of the board and chief executive officer, and his spouse own 34.4% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, which has one vote per share, and Mr. Adams owns 90.4% and his son-in-law, Adolphus B. Baker, our president, chief operating officer and one of our directors, owns 9.6% of the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock, which has ten votes per share. Mr. Baker and his spouse also own 1.8% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. As a result, currently Mr. Adams and his spouse possess 66.0%, and Messrs. Adams and Baker and their spouses possess 72.0% of the total voting power represented by the outstanding shares of our Common Stock and Class A Common Stock. These stockholdings include shares of our Common Stock accumulated under our employee stock ownership plan for the respective accounts of Messrs. Adams and Baker.

        The Adams family intends to retain ownership of a sufficient amount of Common Stock and Class A Common Stock to assure its continued ownership of over 50% of the combined voting power of our outstanding shares of capital stock. Such ownership will make an unsolicited acquisition of us more difficult and discourage certain types of transactions involving a change of control of our company, including transactions in which the holders of Common Stock might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices. In addition, certain provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation require that our Class A Common Stock be issued only to Fred R. Adams, Jr. and members of his immediate family, and that if shares of the Class A Common Stock, by operation of law or otherwise, are deemed not to be owned by Mr. Adams or a member of his immediate family, the voting power of any such shares shall be automatically reduced to one vote per share. The Adams family controlling ownership of our capital stock may adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.

        Based on Mr. Adams’ beneficial ownership of our outstanding capital stock, we are a “controlled company,” as defined in Rule 4350(c) (5) of the listing standards of the NASDAQ National Market on which our shares of Common Stock are quoted. Accordingly, we are exempt from certain requirements of NASDAQ’s corporate governance listing standards, including the requirement to maintain a majority of independent directors on our board of directors and the requirements regarding the determination of compensation of executive officers and the nomination of directors by independent directors.

        ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

        We operate farms, processing plants, hatcheries, feed mills, warehouses, offices and other properties located in Arkansas, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Utah. The facilities currently include two breeding facilities, one hatchery, two wholesale distribution centers, 13 feed mills, 19 shell egg production facilities, 18 pullet growing facilities, and 20 processing and packing facilities Most of our operations are conducted from properties we own.

        Presently, we own approximately 15,000 acres of land in various locations throughout our geographic market area. We have the ability to hatch 13 million pullet chicks annually, grow 13 million pullets annually, house 18 million laying hens and control the production of an aggregate total of 20 million layers. We also own or control mills that can produce 500 tons per hour of feed, and processing facilities capable of processing 7,000 cases of shell eggs per hour (with each case containing 30 dozen shell eggs). Our facilities are well-maintained and operate at a high level of efficiency. Typically, we insure our facilities for replacement value.

13

        Over the past five fiscal years, our capital expenditures have totaled an aggregate amount of approximately $65 million. The Company’s facilities currently are maintained in good operable condition and are insured to an extent the Company deems adequate.

        ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

        Chicken Litter Litigation

        On December 26, 2002, Cal-Maine Farms, Inc. (“Cal-Maine Farms”), a Delaware corporation wholly owned by us, was served with process in a civil complaint filed in the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi, on behalf of plaintiffs, Hunter McWhorter, his two parents, and Michael Green. In addition to Cal-Maine Farms, Fred Adams, Adolphus Baker, Charles Collins, R. K. Looper and B. J. Raines, officers of our company, are among the 50 named defendants. Other defendants include Cargill, Incorporated, George’s Farms, Inc., Peterson Farms, Inc., Simmons Foods, Inc., Simmons Poultry Farms, Inc., and Tyson Foods, Inc., each of which is engaged in the broiler business. Individual defendants that were affiliated with the other corporate defendants also were named in the suit.

        The suit alleges that plaintiffs suffered medical problems from living near land upon which “litter” from the flocks of hens owned by certain of the defendants was spread as fertilizer. The suit specifically addresses conditions alleged to exist in Washington County, Arkansas, where there is a relatively high concentration of broiler farms. Cal-Maine Farms is not engaged in any broiler production and, compared to the broiler producers, has a very small portion of hens located in Washington County. The suit alleges actual damages in the amount of $55,000,000 and requests punitive damages in the amount of $100,000,000. On December 31, 2002, an amended complaint was filed, bringing the number of plaintiffs to 93.

        On November 7, 2003, an Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice was issued by the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi. On December 5, 2003, the plaintiffs appealed the order to the Mississippi Supreme Court which ruled in favor of Cal-Maine and affirmed the order of dismissal.

        On February 3, 2004, Cal-Maine Farms was served with process in a civil complaint filed in the Circuit Court of Washington County, Arkansas, on behalf of Keith McWhorter and Patsy McWhorter, individually and as next friends and guardians of Hunter McWhorter, a plaintiff in the action described above. Other defendants include Alpharma Inc., Alpharma Animal Health Co., Cargill, Incorporated, George’s Farms, Inc., Peterson Farms, Inc., Simmons Foods, Inc., Simmons Poultry Farms, Inc., and Tyson Foods, Inc., each of which is engaged in the broiler business, and an individual.

        The suit alleges that the plaintiffs have suffered medical problems resulting from living near land upon which “litter” from the defendants’ flocks was spread as fertilizer. This suit focuses on a feed ingredient that contains arsenic and is alleged to be in the litter that was spread. This particular feed ingredient is not used in our shell egg production feed formulation. The suit, like the suit described above, also addresses conditions alleged to exist in Washington County. The suit seeks unspecified actual damages and requests unspecified punitive damages. An answer has been filed on behalf of Cal-Maine Farms and no discovery has taken place. At this stage, it is impossible to evaluate the potential exposure, if any, of Cal-Maine Farms to damages in this suit.

        Contract Grower Litigation

        On March 23, 2004, a civil complaint was filed against Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. by Olen L. Wells, a former contract producer. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. The complaint alleged that we verbally agreed to place layer-hen flocks in a particular production facility for a period of ten years if the plaintiff would install a new feeder system in that facility. The complaint sought unspecified damages. We filed our answer denying the existence of any such verbal contract and explaining that all arrangements with contract producers are on a flock-to-flock basis. The Court ruled in Cal-Maine’s favor, and the plaintiff agreed not to appeal.

14

        State of Oklahoma Watershed Pollution Litigation

        On June 18, 2005, the State of Oklahoma filed suit, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, against a number of companies, including Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. Most of the companies are broiler producers. Process has not yet been served.  Accordingly, no answer is yet due.  No other filings of any nature have been made. The State of Oklahoma claims that through the disposal of chicken litter the defendants have polluted the Illinois River Watershed.  This watershed provides water to eastern Oklahoma.  The Complaint seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages.  The parties are presently attempting to mediate a resolution of the issues raised in the Complaint.  The mediation is being conducted in stages.  At present, the mediation is focused on Oklahoma’s demand that chicken litter be disposed of by methods other than as use as fertilizer in the watershed.  Cal-Maine no longer has any operation in the watershed, so Cal-Maine is not greatly affected by this aspect of the mediation.  We are not able at present to give an opinion regarding the ultimate resolution of this action.

        ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

        No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.

PART II.

        ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES Of EQUITY SECURITIES

        Our Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “CALM”. The last reported sale price for our Common Stock on August 3, 2005 was $6.34 per share. The following table sets forth the high and low daily sale prices and dividends for four quarters of fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005. The sales prices have been adjusted to reflect the recent 2-for-1 split of our Common Stock effective April 14, 2004, as if the split had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2004.

        There is no public trading market for the Class A Common Stock, the majority outstanding shares of which are owned by Fred R. Adams, Jr., Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

        STOCKHOLDERS

        At July 28, 2005, there were approximately 295 record holders of our Common Stock and approximately 5,400 beneficial owners whose shares were held by nominees or broker dealers.

15

        DIVIDENDS

        We have paid cash dividends on our Common Stock since 1998. Prior to the 2-for-1 stock split, a cash dividend at the annual rate of $0.05 per share of Common Stock, or $0.0125 per quarter, was paid in each of the full quarters shown in the table above. We expect to pay cash dividends on our Common Stock at the same annual rate of $0.05 per share on a post-split basis, thus doubling the aggregate amount of cash dividends payable by us. Since 1998, we have also paid cash dividends on our Class A Common Stock at a rate equal to 95% of the annual rate on our Common Stock. Our Board of Directors will continue to consider the declaration of cash dividends in the future in light of our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements for possible acquisitions and new construction, and other relevant economic factors. In addition, under the terms of agreements with our principal lenders, we are subject to various financial covenants, including a limitation on our ability to pay cash dividends in an aggregate amount not to exceed $500,000 per quarter.

        RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

        No sales of securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 occurred during our fiscal year ended May 28, 2005.

        EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

        The following table contains information, as of May 28, 2005, about our equity compensation plans, all of which were approved by security holders.

        PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

        Stock Repurchase Program

        On August 3, 2004, our Board of Directors approved a repurchase program whereby we may purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of our Common Stock. The repurchase program expired on July 31, 2005. We do not have any other stock repurchase programs.

        The following table sets forth the share repurchase activity for the fourth quarter ended May 28, 2005:

16

        ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

        The per share data shown in the following table has been adjusted to reflect the 2-for-1 split of our Common Stock effective April 14, 2004, as if the split had occurred at the beginning of fiscal year 2001.

17

        ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIALCONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        Risk Factors; Forward-Looking Statements

        For information relating to important risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, securities, financial condition or operating results, reference is made to the disclosure set forth under Item 1 above under the caption “Risk Factors.” In addition, because the following discussion includes numerous forward-looking statements relating to us, our results of operations and financial condition and business, reference is made to the information set forth above in Item 1 under the caption “Important Factors Relating to Forward-Looking Statements.”

        OVERVIEW

        We are primarily engaged in the production, grading, packing, and sale of fresh shell eggs. Our fiscal year end is the Saturday nearest to May 31 which was May 28, 2005 (52 weeks), May 29, 2004 (52 weeks) and May 31, 2003 (52 weeks) for the most recent three fiscal years.

        Our operations are fully integrated. At our facilities we hatch chicks, grow pullets, manufacture feed, and produce, process, and distribute shell eggs. We currently are the largest producer and distributor of fresh shell eggs in the United States. Shell eggs accounted for approximately 96% of our net sales in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004. We primarily market our shell eggs in the southwestern, southeastern, mid-western and mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. Shell eggs are sold directly by us primarily to national and regional supermarket chains.

        We currently use contract producers for approximately 12% of our total egg production. Contract producers operate under agreements with us for the use of their facilities in the production of shell eggs by layers owned by us. We also own the eggs produced. Also, shell eggs are purchased, as needed, for resale by us from outside producers.

        Our operating income or loss is significantly affected by wholesale shell egg market prices, which can fluctuate widely and are outside of our control. Retail sales of shell eggs are greatest during the fall and winter months and lowest during the summer months. Prices for shell eggs fluctuate in response to seasonal factors and a natural increase in egg production during the spring and early summer.

        Our cost of production is materially affected by feed costs, which average about 55% of our total farm egg production cost. Changes in feed costs result in changes in our cost of goods sold. The cost of feed ingredients is affected by a number of supply and demand factors such as crop production and weather, and other factors, such as the level of grain exports, over which we have little or no control.

18

        RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, certain items from our consolidated statements of operations expressed as a percentage of net sales.

        Fiscal Year Ended May 28, 2005 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended May 29, 2004

         Net Sales. Approximately 96% of our net sales consist of shell egg sales. Approximately 3% of our net sales include incidental feed sales to outside egg producers, with the 1% balance consisting of net sales from other farming activities. Net sales for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2005 were $375.3 million, a decrease of $197.0 million, or 34.4%, from net sales of $572.3 million for fiscal 2004. Total dozens of eggs sold and egg selling prices decreased as compared to fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2005, total dozens of shell eggs sold were 575.4 million, a decrease of 29.8 million dozen, or 4.9%, compared to 605.2 million dozen sold in fiscal 2004. Our average selling price of shell eggs decreased from $.914 per dozen for fiscal 2004 to $.625 per dozen for fiscal 2005, a decrease of $.289 per dozen, or 32.0%. Our operating results are significantly affected by wholesale shell egg market prices, which are outside of our control. Small changes in production or demand levels can have a large effect on shell egg prices. During fiscal 2004 and the first quarter of fiscal 2005, consumer demand increased. This increase in demand was partially due to the popularity of high protein diets. At the start of fiscal 2004, egg supply was level and, during fiscal 2004, egg producers increased egg supply to meet consumer demand. During our second fiscal 2005 quarter, consumer demand decreased to normal levels. At this same time, egg supply continued at the higher levels and resulted in a drop in egg selling prices for the remainder of fiscal 2005.

         Cost of Sales. Cost of sales consists of costs directly related to production and processing of shell eggs, including feed costs, and purchases of shell eggs from outside egg producers. Cost of sales for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2005 was $339.8 million, a decrease of $56.9 million, or 14.3%, as compared to cost of sales of $396.7 million for fiscal 2004. Dozens sold, cost of purchases from outside shell egg producers and cost of feed ingredients decreased in fiscal 2005. Dozens produced in our facilities decreased 5.0% and dozens purchased from outside shell egg producers decreased 4.5%. The decrease in the cost of the shell eggs purchased from outside producers was due to lower egg market selling prices. Feed cost for fiscal 2005 was $.225 per dozen, compared to $.234 per dozen for the prior fiscal year, a decrease of 3.8%. A 32.0% decrease in egg selling prices, offset by a small decrease in feed ingredient costs and lower cost of purchases from outside egg producers, resulted in a decrease in gross profit from 30.7% of net sales for fiscal 2004 to 9.4% of net sales for fiscal 2005.

19

         Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses include costs of marketing, distribution, accounting and corporate overhead. Selling, general and administrative expense was $47.8 million in fiscal 2005, a decrease of $21.5 million as compared to $69.3 million for fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2004, we recorded $22.1 million for stock compensation expense as compared to a benefit of $1.3 million for fiscal 2005, applicable to stock options and Tandem Stock Appreciation Rights accounted for under the variable plan accounting requirements of APB Opinion No.25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. The market price of our outstanding common stock ranged from $2.62 at May 31, 2003 to $13.80 at May 29, 2004 to $6.76 at May 28, 2005. Excluding the stock compensation expense, fiscal 2005 selling, general and administrative expense was $49.1 million compared to $47.2 million for fiscal 2004, an increase of $1.9 million, or 4.0%. The increase is due to increases in general insurance, franchise fees, employee health benefits, fuel costs, and costs to comply with the internal control reporting requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. On a cost per dozen sold basis, excluding the stock compensation expense, selling, general and administrative expense was $0.083 for fiscal 2005 as compared to $0.080 for fiscal 2004. As discussed above, total dozens sold in fiscal 2005 decreased 4.9%. As a percent of net sales, selling, general and administrative expense increased from 12.1% for fiscal 2004 to 12.7% for fiscal 2005.

         Operating Income(Loss) . As a result of the above, our operating loss was $12.3 million for fiscal 2005, as compared to operating income of $106.3 million for fiscal 2004. As a percent of net sales, the operating loss for fiscal 2005 was 3.3%, as compared to operating income of 18.6% for fiscal 2004.

         Other Income (Expense). Other income or expense consists of costs or income not directly charged to, or related to, operations such as interest expense and equity in income of affiliates. Other expense for fiscal 2005 was $3.1 million as compared to other expense of $80,000 for fiscal 2004. For fiscal 2005, net interest expense decreased $2.3 million, the net result of a $1.7 million decrease in interest expense and a $600,000 increase in interest income. Interest expense decreased due to reduced long-term debt balances and additional interest income was received from cash equivalent investments. Other income for fiscal 2005 decreased from equity in lower income of affiliates. As a percent of net sales, other expense was 0.8% for fiscal 2005, as compared to 0.1% for fiscal 2004.

         Income Taxes. For the fiscal year ended May 28, 2005, our pre-tax loss was $15.4 million, as compared to pre-tax income of $106.2 million for fiscal 2004. For fiscal 2005, an income tax benefit of $5.0 million was recorded with an effective tax rate of 32.8%, as compared to an income tax expense of $39.8 million with an effective tax rate of 37.5% for fiscal 2004.

         Net Income. As a result of the above, net loss for fiscal 2005 was $10.4 million, or $0.43 per basic and diluted share, compared to net income of $66.4 million, or $2.78 per basic share, or $2.73 per diluted share, for fiscal 2004.

        Fiscal Year Ended May 29, 2004 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 2003

         Net Sales. Approximately 96% of our net sales consist of shell egg sales. Approximately 3% of our net sales include incidental feed sales to outside egg producers, with the 1% balance consisting of other farming activities. Net sales for the fiscal year ended May 29, 2004 were $572.3 million, an increase of $184.8 million, or 47.7%, from net sales of $387.5 million for fiscal 2003. Total dozens of eggs sold increased in fiscal 2004 and egg selling prices increased as compared with prices in fiscal 2003. In fiscal 2004, total dozens of shell eggs sold were 605.2 million, an increase of 34.5 million dozen, or 6.0%, compared to 570.7 million dozen sold in fiscal 2003. Consumer demand was good and egg supply was level, which resulted in higher egg selling prices during fiscal 2004. Our average selling price of shell eggs increased from $.645 per dozen for fiscal 2003 to $.914 per dozen for fiscal 2004, an increase of $.269 per dozen, or 41.7%. We believe our financial results for the past fiscal year have been positively affected by increased demand, primarily caused by favorable publicity about eggs from the medical community, increased use of eggs in high protein diets that are currently popular and a level egg supply within the industry.

         Cost of Sales. Cost of sales consists of costs directly related to production and processing of shell eggs, including feed costs, and purchases of shell eggs from outside egg producers. Cost of sales for the fiscal year ended May 29, 2004 was $396.7 million, an increase of $81.5 million, or 25.9%, as compared to cost of sales of $315.2 million for fiscal 2003. Dozens sold, cost of purchases from outside egg producers and cost of feed ingredients increased in fiscal 2004. During fiscal 2003, we recognized $9.5 million as a reduction in cost of sales for our share of the settlement of certain class action feed ingredient lawsuits. The 6.0 % increase in dozens sold was from increases in dozens produced in our facilities and in the number of dozens purchased from outside egg producers. The increase in the cost of the eggs purchased from outside producers was due to higher egg market selling prices. Feed cost for fiscal 2004 was $.234 per dozen, compared to $.213 per dozen for the prior fiscal year, an increase of 10.0%. A 41.7% increase in egg selling prices, offset by higher feed ingredient costs and higher cost of purchases from outside egg producers, resulted in an increase in gross profit from 18.7% of net sales for fiscal 2003 to 30.7% of net sales for fiscal 2004.

20

         Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses include costs of marketing, distribution, accounting and corporate overhead. Selling, general and administrative expense was $69.3 million in fiscal 2004, an increase of $23.3 million as compared to an expense of $46.0 million for fiscal 2003. For fiscal 2004, we recorded an expense of $22.1 million for stock compensation due to the increase in the market price of our outstanding common stock from $2.62 at May 31, 2003 to $13.80 at May 29, 2004, as compared to an expense of $1.1 million for fiscal 2003. Excluding the $21.0 million increase in stock compensation expense, the fiscal 2004 year increase for selling, general and administrative expense was $2.3 million, or 5.0%. The increase is the net of increases in legal and professional fees, general insurance and franchise fees, offset by a reduction in bad debt expense. The biggest increase, approximately $2.4 million was for legal and professional fees, primarily related to our going private transaction that was terminated in November 2003 and our proposed underwritten public offering of common stock that was withdrawn in April 2004. In fiscal 2003, one of our customers filed for bankruptcy and we increased our bad debt allowance by $1.1 million. Due to the increased sales volume in fiscal 2004, general administrative expenses increased slightly. On a cost per dozen sold basis, excluding the $21.0 million increase in stock compensation expense, selling, general and administrative expense was $0.080 for fiscal 2004 as compared to $0.076 for fiscal 2003. As a percent of net sales, selling, general and administrative expense increased from 11.9% for fiscal 2003 to 12.1% for fiscal 2004.

         Operating Income . As a result of the above, our operating income was $106.3 million for fiscal 2004, as compared to operating income of $26.3 million for fiscal 2003. As a percent of net sales, the operating income for fiscal 2004 was 18.6%, as compared to operating income of 6.8% for fiscal 2003.

         Other Income (Expense). Other income or expense consists of costs or income not directly charged to, or related to, operations such as interest expense and equity in income of affiliates. Other expense for fiscal 2004 was $80,000, a decrease of $7.0 million, as compared to other expense of $7.1 million for fiscal 2003. For fiscal 2004, net interest expense decreased $1.6 million and other income increased $5.4 million. Net interest expense decreased as the result of reduced long term debt balances and receipt of $944,000 interest income as part of an income tax refund. Other income for fiscal 2004 increased from equity in income of affiliates. As a percent of net sales, other expense was 0.1% for fiscal 2004, as compared to 1.8% for fiscal 2003.

         Income Taxes. For the fiscal year ended May 29, 2004, our pre-tax income was $106.2 million, as compared to pre-tax income of $19.1 million for fiscal 2003. For fiscal 2004, an income tax expense of $39.8 million was recorded with an effective tax rate of 37.5%, as compared to an income tax expense of $6.9 million with an effective tax rate of 36.2% for fiscal 2003.

         Net Income. As a result of the above, net income for fiscal 2004 was $66.4 million, or $2.78 per basic share, or $2.73 per diluted share, compared to net income of $12.2 million, or $0.52 per basic share, or $.515 per diluted share, for fiscal 2003.

         Capital Resources and Liquidity. Our working capital at May 28, 2005 was $73.6 million compared to $92.9 million at May 29, 2004. Our current ratio was 2.41 at May 28, 2005 as compared with 2.58 at May 29, 2004. Our need for working capital generally is highest in the first and second fiscal quarters ending in August and November. During the first quarter shell egg prices are normally at seasonal lows. In the second quarter, we usually build inventory balances in anticipation of the holiday season. Seasonal borrowing needs frequently are higher during these periods than during other fiscal periods. We have a $35 million line of credit with three banks, $2.6 million of which was utilized as a standby letter of credit at May 28, 2005. Our long-term debt at that date, including current maturities, totaled $83.0 million, as compared to $90.0 million at May 29, 2004.

21

        For the fiscal year ended May 28, 2005, $9.6 million in net cash was provided by operating activities. This compares to $85.1 million of net cash for fiscal year ended May 29, 2004. In fiscal 2005, $12.0 million was used for purchases of property, plant and equipment, and $879,000 was received from sales of property, plant and equipment. Net cash of $13.9 million was used in investments and payments of $1.3 million were received on notes receivable. Approximately $9.0 million was used for net purchases of common stock for the treasury, and $1.2 million was used for payments of dividends on our common stock. Proceeds from long-term borrowings of $2.5 million were received in additional long-term debt and payments of $9.5 million were made on long-term debt. The net result was a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $31.3 million.

        For the fiscal year ended May 29, 2004, $85.1 million in net cash was provided by operating activities. In fiscal 2004, $8.7 million was used for purchases of property, plant and equipment, $594,000 was received from sales of property, plant and equipment, and $2.0 million was used for construction projects. Net cash of $19.1 million was used in investments and a decrease in notes receivable. Approximately $8.4 million was received from the exercise of stock options, and $746,000 was used for payments of dividends on our common stock. Long-term borrowings of $5.0 million were received and $20.0 million was received in restructuring and re-pricing certain other long-term debt. Payments of $43.2 million were made on long-term debt. The net result was an increase in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $45.4 million.

        Substantially all trade receivables and inventories collateralize our line of credit and property, plant and equipment collateralize our long-term debt under our loan agreements with our lenders. Unless otherwise approved by our lenders, we are required by provisions of these loan agreements to (1) maintain minimum levels of working capital (ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1) and net worth (minimum of $90.0 million tangible net worth, and, effective with fiscal 2005 year end, 45% of cumulative net income); (2) limit dividends to an aggregate amount not to exceed $500,000 per quarter (allowed if no default), capital expenditures (not to exceed depreciation for the same four fiscal quarters), lease obligations and additional long-term borrowings (total funded debt to total capitalization not to exceed 55%); and (3) maintain various current and cash-flow coverage ratios (1.25 to 1), among other restrictions. At May 28, 2005, we were in compliance with the provisions of all loan agreements. Under certain of the loan agreements, the lenders have the option to require the prepayment of any outstanding borrowings in the event we undergo a change in control.

        Under the terms of our Agreement with Hillandale and the Hillandale shareholders, the egg production and marketing operations to be acquired and liabilities to be assumed by us will be transferred to a new Florida limited liability company named Hillandale, LLC. The two Hillandale companies will be the initial members of Hillandale, LLC, for formation purposes. Upon the completion of an evaluation of the assets and liabilities to be acquired and assumed by us, as agreed to by the parties to the Agreement, we will purchase 51% of the Units of Membership in Hillandale, LLC. The remaining 49% of the Units of Membership in Hillandale, LLC, are to be acquired in essentially equal annual installments over a four-year period, with the purchase price of the units equal to their book value as calculated in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. The acquisition will be made for cash, from our available funds, and borrowings to the extent necessary. We will acquire our initial 51% interest in Hillandale, LLC, at a presently estimated cost of approximately $30 to $35 million, subject to adjustment upwards or downwards, based upon the valuations agreed upon by the parties to the Agreement. Funding of the Hillandale acquisition is expected to be provided by our cash balances and possible borrowings that may be secured by the assets acquired.

        We project capital expenditures of an aggregate of approximately $10.3 million during fiscal 2006.

        We currently have a $2.2 million deferred tax liability due to a subsidiary’s change from a cash basis to an accrual basis taxpayer on May 29, 1988. The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 provides that this liability is payable ratably over the 20 years beginning in fiscal 1999. However, such taxes will be due in their entirety in the first fiscal year in which there is a change in ownership control so that we no longer qualify as a family farming corporation. We are currently making annual payments of approximately $150,000 related to this liability. However, while these current payments reduce cash balances, payment of the $2.1 million deferred tax liability would not impact our consolidated statement of operations or stockholders’ equity, as these taxes have been accrued and are reflected on our consolidated balance sheet. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

22

        We believe that our existing cash and investments, as well as our unused lines of credit, if needed, will satisfy our foreseeable working capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.

        Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        We have no existing off-balance sheet arrangements as defined under SEC regulations.

        Contractual Obligations

        The following table summarizes future estimated cash payments, in thousands, to be made under existing contractual obligations. Further information on debt obligations is contained in Note 6, and on lease obligations in Note 5, of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The table does not reflect the obligations incurred by us for the Hillandale acquisition, the exact amounts of which are to be determined under the terms of the Agreement. At the closing of the Hillandale transaction, we will purchase 51% of the Units of Membership in Hillandale, LLC at a presently estimated cost of approximately $30 to $35 million, subject to adjustment upwards or downwards, based on valuations agreed to by the parties to the Agreement. We will incur costs, which cannot now be estimated, for our purchase of the remaining 49% of the Units of Membership over the four-year period following the closing.

        Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards.

        In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 151, “Inventory Costs”. SFAS No. 151 amends Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 43, Chapter 4, to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and spoilage should be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overhead to inventory be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We are currently assessing the impact that SFAS No. 151 will have on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

        In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), which replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supercedes APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS 123(R) required companies to measure compensation costs for share-based payments to employees, including stock options, at fair value and expense such compensation over the service period beginning with the first annual period after December 15, 2005. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 will no longer be an alternative to financial statement recognition. The Company expects to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. FAS No. 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its requirement using either a modified prospective method or a modified retrospective method. Under the modified prospective method, companies are required to record compensation cost for new and modified awards over the related vesting period of such awards prospectively and record compensation cost prospectively for the unvested portion, at the date of adoption, of previously issued and outstanding awards over the remaining vesting period of such awards. No change to prior periods presented is permitted under the modified prospective method. Under the modified retrospective method, companies record compensation costs for prior periods retroactively through restatement of such periods using the proforma amounts previously disclosed in the footnotes. Also, in the period of adoption and after, companies record compensation cost based on the modified prospective method. We have not yet determined the method of adoption we will use, and we cannot currently estimate the future effects of adopting this new guidance.

23

         Critical Accounting Policies. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

        Management suggests that our Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, as described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, be read in conjunction with this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. We believe the critical accounting policies that most impact our consolidated financial statements are described below.

         Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. In the normal course of business, we extend credit to our customers on a short-term basis. Although credit risks associated with our customers are considered minimal, we routinely review our accounts receivable balances and make provisions for probable doubtful accounts. In circumstances where management is aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us (e.g. bankruptcy filings), a specific reserve is recorded to reduce the receivable to the amount expected to be collected. For all other customers, we recognize reserves for bad debts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, generally 100% for amounts more than 60 days past due.

         Inventories. Inventories of eggs, feed, supplies and livestock are valued principally at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. If market prices for eggs and feed grains move substantially lower, we would record adjustments to write-down the carrying values of eggs and feed inventories to fair market value. The cost associated with flock inventories, consisting principally of chick purchases, feed, labor, contractor payments and overhead costs, are accumulated during the growing period of approximately 18 weeks. Capitalized flock costs are then amortized over the productive lives of the flocks, generally one to two years. Flock mortality is charged to cost of sales as incurred. High mortality from disease or extreme temperatures would result in abnormal adjustments to write-down flock inventories. Management continually monitors each flock and attempts to take appropriate actions to minimize the risk of mortality loss.

         Long-Lived Assets. Depreciable long-lived assets are primarily comprised of buildings and improvements and machinery and equipment. Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives, which are 15 to 25 years for buildings and improvements and 3 to 12 years for machinery and equipment. An increase or decrease in the estimated useful lives would result in changes to depreciation expense. We continually reevaluate the carrying value of our long-lived assets, for events or changes in circumstances, which indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. As part of this reevaluation, we estimate the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposal. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the long-lived asset to the estimated fair value of the asset.

         Investment in Affiliates. We have invested in other companies engaged in the production, processing and distribution of shell eggs and egg products. Our ownership percentages in these companies range from less than 20% to 50%. Therefore, these investments are recorded using the cost or the equity method, and accordingly, not consolidated in our financial statements. Changes in the ownership percentages of these investments might alter the accounting methods currently used. Our investment in these companies amounted to $8.5 million at May 28, 2005. The combined total assets and total liabilities of these companies were approximately $30 million and $14 million, respectively, at May 28, 2005. We are a guarantor of approximately $6.0 million of long-term debt of one of the affiliates.

         Goodwill. At May 28, 2005, our goodwill balance represented 1.2% of total assets and 2.6% of stockholders’ equity. Goodwill relates to the fiscal 1999 acquisition of Hudson Brothers, Inc. We adopted, as of June 3, 2001, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS 142). Under SFAS 142, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, for impairment. An impairment loss would be recorded if the recorded goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. We have only one operating segment, which is our sole reporting unit. Accordingly, goodwill is tested for impairment at the entity level. Significant adverse industry or economic changes, or other factors not anticipated could result in an impairment charge to reduce recorded goodwill.

24

         Income Taxes. We determine our effective tax rate by estimating our permanent differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. We are periodically audited by taxing authorities. Any audit adjustments affecting permanent differences could have an impact on our effective tax rate.

         Forward Looking Statements. The foregoing statements contain forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties and our actual experience may differ materially from that discussed above. Factors that may cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in “Factors Affecting Future Performance” below, as well as future events that have the effect of reducing our available cash balances, such as unanticipated operating losses or capital expenditures related to possible future acquisitions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as the date hereof. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements.

         Factors Affecting Future Performance. Our future operating results may be affected by various trends and factors which are beyond our control. These include adverse changes in shell egg prices and in the grain markets. Accordingly, past trends should not be used to anticipate future results and trends. Further, our prior performance should not be presumed to be an accurate indication of future performance.

        ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

Our interest expense is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. We maintain certain of our debt as fixed rate in nature to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in interest rates. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage our exposure to interest rate changes. A 1% adverse move (decrease) in interest rates would adversely affect the net fair value of our debt by $3.3 million at May 28, 2005. We are a party to no other market risk sensitive instruments requiring disclosure.

        ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

        Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

        The following sets forth, in accordance with Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Item 308 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-K, the report of management on our internal control over financial reporting.

        1.        Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. “Internal control over financial reporting” is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, together with other financial officers, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

25

        2.        Our management, in accordance with Rule 13a-15(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, together with other financial officers, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of May 28, 2005. The framework on which management’s evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting is based is the “Internal Control – Integrated Framework”published in 1992 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission.

        3.        We maintain documentation providing reasonable support for management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Management’s documentation includes:

        4.        Management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting as of May 28, 2005, is effective and that there is no material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of that date. In that connection, a “material weakness,” is a significant deficiency, or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected. A “significant deficiency” is a control deficiency or a combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects our ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report external financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of our financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected. A “control deficiency” exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. It is noted that internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives, but rather reasonable assurance of achieving such objectives.

        5.        The attestation report of Ernst & Young LLP on management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, which includes that firm’s opinion on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, is set forth below.

26

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 28, 2005 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.‘s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 28, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 28, 2005, based on the COSO criteria.

27

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. as of May 28, 2005 and May 29, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended May 28, 2005, May 29, 2004, and May 31, 2003, and our report dated August 5, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

New Orleans, Louisiana
August 5, 2005

28

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 28, 2005 and May 29, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the three years ended May 28, 2005, May 29, 2004, and May 31, 2003. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(c). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. at May 28, 2005 and May 29, 2004, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years ended May 28, 2005, May 29, 2004, and May 31, 2003, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Cal-Maine Foods Inc.‘s internal control over financial reporting as of May 28, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated August 5, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

New Orleans, Louisiana
August 5, 2005

29

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

See accompanying notes.

30

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

See accompanying notes.

31

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

See accompanying notes.

32

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)

See accompanying notes.

33

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
May 28, 2005

1. Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) all of which are wholly-owned. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

Business

The Company is engaged in the production, processing and distribution of shell eggs. The Company’s operations are significantly affected by the market price fluctuation of its principal products sold, shell eggs, and the costs of its principal feed ingredients, corn and other grains.

Primarily all of the Company’s sales are to wholesale egg buyers in the southeastern, southwestern, mid-western and mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. Credit is extended based upon an evaluation of each customer’s financial condition and credit history and generally collateral is not required. Credit losses have consistently been within management’s expectations. One customer accounted for 30.9%, 26.8% and 21.3% of the Company’s net sales in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Another customer accounted for 12.1%, 11.9% and 12.8% of the Company’s net sales in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amount reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Investments

Investments include primarily pre-funded municipal bonds and certificates of deposit with maturities of three to six months when purchased. We have designated these investments as available-for-sale securities and have accounted for them in accordance with the standards of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS No.115, “Accounting For Certain Investments: Debt and Equity Securities.” Due to the nature of the investments, the cost at May 28, 2005 and May 29, 2004 approximates fair value; therefore, accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) has not been recognized as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

Trade Receivables

Trade receivables are comprised primarily of amounts owed to the Company from customers, which amounted to $16,044 at May 28, 2005 and $21,943 at May 29, 2004. Trade receivables are presented net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $92 at May 28, 2005 and $90 at May 29, 2004.

34

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

In the normal course of business, we extend credit to our customers on a short-term basis. Although credit risks associated with our customers are considered minimal, we routinely review our accounts receivable balances and make provisions for probable doubtful accounts. In circumstances where management is aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us (e.g. bankruptcy filings), a specific reserve is recorded to reduce the receivable to the amount expected to be collected. For all other customers, we recognize reserves for bad debts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, generally 100% for amounts more than 60 days past due.

Inventories

Inventories of eggs, feed, supplies and livestock are valued principally at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market.

The cost associated with flocks, consisting principally of chick purchases, feed, labor, contractor payments and overhead costs, are accumulated during a growing period of approximately 18 weeks. Flock costs are amortized over the productive lives of the flocks, generally one to two years.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives, which are 15 to 25 years for buildings and improvements and 3 to 12 years for machinery and equipment. We expense repair and maintenance costs as incurred.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company continually reevaluates the carrying value of its long-lived assets for events or changes in circumstances which indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. When triggering events or circumstances indicate a fixed asset may be impaired, we perform an impairment analysis in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”

Intangible Assets

Included in other assets are loan acquisition costs which are amortized over the life of the related loan and franchise fees which are amortized over ten years.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of cost of a business acquisition over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if impairment indications arise.

Revenue Recognition and Delivery Costs

Revenue is recognized when product is delivered and title has passed to customers.

Costs to deliver product to customers are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and totaled $18,311, $18,172, and $18,234 in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

35

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Total advertising costs were $821 in fiscal 2005, $564 in fiscal 2004, and $471 in fiscal 2003.

Income Taxes

Income taxes have been provided using the liability method. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock option grants in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.”

The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” which require compensation cost for all stock-based employee compensation plans to be recognized based on the use of a fair value method.

The fair value of our stock options were estimated as of the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for the prior year grants: risk-free interest rate of 3%; a dividend yield of 1%; expected volatility of 39.2%; and a weighted average expected life of the options of 5 years.

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share are based on the weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share include any dilutive effects of options and warrants.

36

Stock Split

On April 14, 2004, the Shareholders of the Company approved amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to facilitate a two-for-one stock split approved by the Board of Directors on January 26, 2004. The split was effected in the form of a stock dividend paid on April 23, 2004 to stockholders of record on April 14, 2004. All share and per share data in this report has been adjusted to reflect this stock split.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications were made to the fiscal 2004 and 2003 financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 151, “Inventory Costs”. SFAS No. 151 amends Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 43, Chapter 4, to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and spoilage should be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overhead to inventory be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently assessing the impact that SFAS No. 151 will have on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), which replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supercedes APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS 123(R) required companies to measure compensation costs for share-based payments to employees, including stock options, at fair value and expense such compensation over the service period beginning with the first annual period after December 15, 2005. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 will no longer be an alternative to financial statement recognition. The Company expects to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. FAS No. 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its requirement using either a modified prospective method or a modified retrospective method. Under the modified prospective method, companies are required to record compensation cost for new and modified awards over the related vesting period of such awards prospectively and record compensation cost prospectively for the unvested portion, at the date of adoption, of previously issued and outstanding awards over the remaining vesting period of such awards. No change to prior periods presented is permitted under the modified prospective method. Under the modified retrospective method, companies record compensation costs for prior periods retroactively through restatement of such periods using the proforma amounts previously disclosed in the footnotes. Also, in the period of adoption and after, companies record compensation cost based on the modified prospective method. We have not yet determined the method of adoption we will use, and we cannot currently estimate the future effects of adopting this new guidance.

Fiscal Year

The Company’s fiscal year-end is on the Saturday nearest May 31, which was May 28, 2005, May 29, 2004 and May 31, 2003, for the most recent three fiscal years.

2. Investment in Affiliates

The Company owns 50% of Cumberland Milling JV, Specialty Eggs LLC and Delta Egg Farm, LLC (“Delta Egg”) and 44% of American Egg Products, Inc. at May 28, 2005. Investment in affiliates, recorded using the equity method of accounting, totaled $8,502 and $9,948 at May 28, 2005 and at May 29, 2004, respectively. Equity in income or (loss) of ($88), $5,923 and $442 from these entities have been included in the consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

37

The Company is a guarantor of 50% of Delta Egg’s long-term debt, which totaled approximately $12 million at May 28, 2005. Delta Egg’s long-term debt is secured by substantially all fixed assets of Delta Egg and is due in monthly installments through fiscal 2009. Delta Egg is engaged in the production, processing and distribution of shell eggs. The other 50% owner also guarantees 50% of the debt. The guarantee arose when Delta Egg borrowed funds to construct its production and processing facility in 1999. The guarantee would be required if Delta Egg is not able to pay the debt. Management of the Company believes this possibility is unlikely because Delta Egg is now well capitalized.

3. Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following:

4. Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:

Depreciation expense was $16,367, $16,520 and $16,370 in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

38

5. Leases

Future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases that have initial or remaining noncancelable terms in excess of one year at May 28, 2005 are as follows:

Substantially all of the leases provide that the Company pay taxes, maintenance, insurance and certain other operating expenses applicable to the leased assets. The Company has guaranteed under certain operating leases the residual value of transportation equipment at the expiration of the leases. Rent expense was $8,109, $9,193 and $9,457 in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Included in rent expense are vehicle rents totaling $1,318, $1,766 and $2,336 in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

6. Credit Facilities and Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

39

The aggregate annual fiscal year maturities of long-term debt at May 28, 2005 are as follows:

The Company has a $35,000 line of credit with three banks. The line of credit, which expires on December 31, 2006, is limited in availability based upon accounts receivable and inventories. The Company had $32.4 million available to borrow under the line of credit at May 28, 2005. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at 3% above the federal funds rate. Facilities fees of 0.5% per annum are payable quarterly on the unused portion of the line.

Substantially all trade receivables and inventories collateralize the line of credit and property, plant and equipment collateralize the long-term debt. The Company is required, by certain provisions of the loan agreements, to maintain minimum levels of working capital and net worth; to limit dividends, capital expenditures and additional long-term borrowings; and to maintain various current, debt-to-equity and interest coverage ratios. Additionally, the chief executive officer of the Company, or his family, must maintain ownership of not less than 50% of the outstanding voting stock of the Company.

Interest of $5,860, $7,386 and $8,435 was paid during fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Interest of $72 and $419 was capitalized for construction of certain facilities during fiscal 2005 and 2003, respectively. No interest was capitalized during fiscal 2004.

7. Employee Benefit Plans

The Company maintains a medical plan that is qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and not subject to tax under present income tax laws. Under its plan, the Company self-insures, in part, coverage for substantially all full-time employees with coverage

40

by insurance carriers for certain stop-loss provisions for losses greater than $150 for each occurrence. The Company’s expense, including accruals for incurred but not reported claims, were approximately $7,065, $5,911 and $6,258 in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The Company has a 401(k) plan which covers substantially all employees. Participants in the Plan may contribute up to the maximum allowed by Internal Revenue Service regulations. The Company does not make contributions to the 401(k) plan.

The Company has an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) that covers substantially all employees. The Company makes contributions to the ESOP of 3% of participants’ compensation, plus an additional amount determined at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Contributions may be made in cash or the Company’s common stock. Company contributions to the ESOP vest immediately. The Company’s contributions to the plan were $1,643, $1,755 and $2,056 in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The Company has deferred compensation agreements with certain officers for payments to be made over specified periods beginning when the officers reach age 65 or over as specified in the agreements. Amounts accrued for these agreements are based upon deferred compensation earned over the estimated remaining service period of each officer. Deferred compensation expense totaled approximately $72 in fiscal 2005, $80 in fiscal 2004 and $50 in fiscal 2003.

8. Stock Option Plan

The Company has elected to follow APB No. 25 and related Interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share is required by SFAS No. 123, and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of that Statement. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for fiscal 2003: risk-free interest rate of 3%; dividend yield of 1%; volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company’s common stock of 39.2%, and a weighted-average expected life of the options of 5 years. No options were granted by the Company during fiscal 2005 and 2004. The weighted-average fair value of options granted during fiscal 2003 was $0.72.

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information is as follows:

41

The Company has reserved 1,600,000 shares under its 1993 Stock Option Plan. The options have ten-year terms and vest annually over five years beginning one year from the grant date. At May 28, 2005, no shares were available for grant under the 1993 plan.

The Company has reserved 1,000,000 shares under its 1999 Stock Option Plan, all of which were granted to officers and key employees in fiscal 2000. Each stock option granted under the 1999 Stock Option Plan was accompanied by the grant of a Tandem Stock Appreciation Right (“TSAR”). The options and TSARs have ten-year terms and vest annually over five years beginning one year from the grant date. Upon exercise of a stock option, the related TSAR is also considered to be exercised, and the holder will receive a cash payment from the Company equal to the excess of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock and the option exercise price. Compensation expense (benefit) of $(1,277), $23,225 and $1,119 applicable to this plan was recognized in fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The weighted average remaining contractual life of the options outstanding was 5 years at May 28, 2005, 6 years at May 29, 2004, and 7 years at May 31, 2003. Of the total options outstanding, 39,600, 25,000 and 551,200 were exercisable at May 28, 2005, May 29, 2004, and May 31, 2003, respectively.

9. Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following: