CAL-MAINE FOODS INC - Quarter Report: 2006 December (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(mark
one)
x
|
Quarterly
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended December 2, 2006
OR
o
|
Transition
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934
|
For
the
transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission
file number: 000-04892
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
64-0500378
|
(State
or other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
3320
Woodrow Wilson Avenue, Jackson, Mississippi 39209
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip
Code)
(601)
948-6813
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
Accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-
Accelerated filer o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
x
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock
(exclusive of treasury shares), as of December 29, 2006.
Common
Stock, $0.01 par value
|
21,102,891
shares
|
Class
A Common Stock, $0.01 par value
|
2,400,000
shares
|
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
|
|
Page
|
|
Part
I. Financial
Information
|
Number
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
3
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets -
|
|||
December
2, 2006 and June 3, 2006
|
3
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations -
|
|||
Thirteen
Weeks and Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
|
|||
|
|
December
2, 2006 and November 26, 2005
|
4
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -
|
|||
Twenty-Six
Weeks Ended December 2, 2006 and
|
|||
|
|
November
26, 2005
|
5
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
||
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of
|
|
Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
9
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
14
|
|
|
|||
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
15
|
Part
II. Other
Information
|
|||
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
15
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
16
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
16
|
|
|||
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
16
|
|
|||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
16
|
|
Signatures
|
17
|
2
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands)
December
2,
2006
|
June
3,
2006
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
(note1)
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
11,364
|
$
|
13,295
|
|||
Investments
|
10,000
|
25,000
|
|||||
Trade
and other receivables
|
43,745
|
24,955
|
|||||
Recoverable
federal income taxes
|
1,086
|
1,177
|
|||||
Inventories
|
60,369
|
57,843
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
1,544
|
3,408
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
128,108
|
125,678
|
|||||
Notes
receivable and investments
|
8,496
|
8,316
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
4,016
|
4,016
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
2,652
|
2,833
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
346,805
|
339,831
|
|||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(172,271
|
)
|
(163,556
|
)
|
|||
174,534
|
176,275
|
||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
317,806
|
$
|
317,118
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
44,325
|
$
|
34,642
|
|||
Current
maturities of purchase obligation
|
5,435
|
6,884
|
|||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
12,930
|
11,902
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
11,690
|
11,450
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
74,380
|
64,878
|
|||||
Long-term
debt, less current maturities
|
90,650
|
92,010
|
|||||
Minority
interest
|
752
|
919
|
|||||
Purchase
obligation, less current maturities
|
9,479
|
16,751
|
|||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
3,920
|
3,860
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
18,355
|
18,925
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
197,536
|
197,343
|
|||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock $0.01 par value per share:
|
|||||||
Authorized
shares - 60,000
|
|||||||
Issued
35,130 shares and 21,103 shares outstanding at December 2, 2006 and
June
3, 2006
|
351
|
351
|
|||||
Class
A common stock $0.01 par value per share, authorized
issued
and outstanding 2,400 shares at December 2, 2006 and
June
3, 2006
|
24
|
24
|
|||||
Paid-in
capital
|
28,809
|
28,700
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
112,569
|
112,183
|
|||||
Common
stock in treasury-14,027 shares at December 2, 2006
and
June 3, 2006
|
(21,483
|
)
|
(21,483
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
120,270
|
119,775
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
317,806
|
$
|
317,118
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
13
Weeks Ended
|
26
Weeks Ended
|
||||||||||||
December
2, 2006
|
November
26, 2005
|
December
2, 2006
|
November
26, 2005
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
137,737
|
$
|
138,288
|
$
|
253,045
|
$
|
218,043
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
112,782
|
120,479
|
219,683
|
199,274
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
24,955
|
17,809
|
33,362
|
18,769
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
14,458
|
16,729
|
28,928
|
27,647
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
10,497
|
1,080
|
4,434
|
(8,878
|
)
|
||||||||
Other
income (expense):
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(1,764
|
)
|
(2,294
|
)
|
(3,559
|
)
|
(3,989
|
)
|
|||||
Other
|
824
|
192
|
681
|
(256
|
)
|
||||||||
(940
|
)
|
(2,102
|
)
|
(2,878
|
)
|
(4,245
|
)
|
||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
9,557
|
(1,022
|
)
|
1,556
|
(13,123
|
)
|
|||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
3,156
|
(337
|
)
|
586
|
(4,330
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
6,401
|
$
|
(685
|
)
|
$
|
970
|
$
|
(8,793
|
)
|
|||
Net
income (loss) per common share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.27
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
$
|
0.04
|
$
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.27
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
$
|
0.04
|
$
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|||
Dividends
per common share
|
$
|
.0125
|
$
|
.0125
|
$
|
.0250
|
$
|
.0250
|
|||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
23,503
|
23,495
|
23,503
|
23,492
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
23,597
|
23,495
|
23,596
|
23,492
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
(unaudited)
26
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||
December
2, 2006
|
November
26, 2005
|
||||||
Cash
provided by (used in) operations
|
$
|
2,345
|
$
|
(12,668
|
)
|
||
Investing
activities:
|
|||||||
Sales
of short-term investments
|
15,000
|
26,384
|
|||||
Acquisition
of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
-
|
(23,804
|
)
|
||||
Purchases
of property, plant and equipment
|
(12,065
|
)
|
(2,838
|
)
|
|||
Payments
received on notes receivable and from investments
|
560
|
1,433
|
|||||
Increase
in notes receivable and investments
|
(1,030
|
)
|
(519
|
)
|
|||
Net
proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
277
|
1,568
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
2,742
|
2,224
|
|||||
Financing
activities:
Payment
of purchase obligation
|
(6,102
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock from treasury
|
-
|
46
|
|||||
Proceeds
from long-term borrowings
|
3,000
|
28,000
|
|||||
Principal
payments on long-term debt
|
(3,331
|
)
|
(24,283
|
)
|
|||
Payments
of dividends
|
(585
|
)
|
(584
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(7,018
|
)
|
3,179
|
||||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,931
|
)
|
(7,265
|
)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
13,295
|
20,221
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
11,364
|
$
|
12,956
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(in
thousands, except share amounts)
December
2, 2006
(unaudited)
1. Presentation
of Interim Information
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting
of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the three-month and six-month periods
ended December 2, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be
expected for the year ending June 2, 2007.
The
balance sheet at June 3, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date but does not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements.
For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.'s annual report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2006.
Hillandale
Acquisition
On
July
28, 2005, we entered into an Agreement to Form a Limited Liability Company
with
Hillandale Farms, Inc. and Hillandale Farms of Florida, Inc. (together,
“Hillandale”), and the Hillandale shareholders (the “Agreement”). Under the
terms of the Agreement, we acquired 51% of the Units of Membership in
Hillandale, LLC, formed under the Agreement, for cash of approximately $27
million on October 12, 2005, with the remaining 49% of the Units of Membership
to be acquired in essentially equal annual installments over a four-year period.
The purchase price of the Units equals their book value at the time of purchase
as calculated under the terms of the Agreement.
In
August
2006,
in
accordance with the Agreement, we
purchased, for $6.1 million, an additional 13% of the Units of Hillandale,
LLC
based on their book value as of July 29, 2006. Our ownership of Hillandale,
LLC
currently is 64%. Our obligation to acquire the remaining 36% of Hillandale,
LLC
is recorded at its present value of $14.9 million as of December 2, 2006, of
which $5.4 million is included in current liabilities and $9.5 million is
included in other non-current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet. We will purchase an additional 12% of Hillandale LLC based on
the
book value of the Membership Units as of July 29, 2007.
Prior
to
the acquisition of our Units of Membership in Hillandale, LLC, we had a 44%
membership interest in American Egg Products, LLC (“AEP”) and Hillandale, LLC
had a 27.5% membership interest in AEP. Prior to the acquisition of Hillandale,
LLC, our membership interest in AEP was accounted for by the equity method.
Effective with our acquisition of Hillandale, LLC, we own a majority of the
membership interests in AEP. Accordingly, the financial statements of AEP have
been consolidated with our financial statements effective July 29,
2005.
We
gained
effective control of the Hillandale, LLC operations upon signing of the
Agreement. Accordingly, the acquisition date for accounting purposes was July
28, 2005. The operations of Hillandale, LLC were consolidated with our
operations beginning July 29, 2005. Because all of the information to close
the
accounting records of Hillandale, LLC was not available at August 27, 2005,
we
did not include the financial statements of Hillandale, LLC in our consolidated
financial statements until the second fiscal quarter of 2006.
The
unaudited financial information in the table below summarizes the combined
results of our operations and Hillandale, LLC, on a pro forma basis, as though
we had been combined as of the beginning of the earliest period presented.
The
pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only
and
is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved
if
the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the earliest period
presented.
6
26
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||
December
2,
2006
|
November
26,
2005
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
253,045
|
$
|
231,017
|
|||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
970
|
$
|
(12,949
|
)
|
||
Basic
net income (loss) per share
|
$
|
0.04
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
||
Diluted
net income (loss) per share
|
$
|
0.04
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
Stock
Based Compensation
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) Statement No. 123
(revised 2004) (“SFAS No.123(R)”), "Share-Based Payment," which is a revision of
SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." SFAS
No. 123(R) supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion
No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", and amends SFAS
No. 95, "Statement of Cash Flows". SFAS No. 123(R) requires all
share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options,
restricted stock and performance-based shares to be recognized in the income
statement based on their fair values. SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the
benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be
reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as
required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating
cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption.
In
the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the
modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation
cost will be recognized for all share-based payments granted after the adoption
of SFAS No. 123(R) and for all awards granted to employees prior to the
adoption date of SFAS No. 123R that remain unvested on the adoption date.
Accordingly, no restatements were made to prior periods. We recognized stock
based compensation expense of $93 and $253 for the thirteen week and twenty-six
week periods ended December 2, 2006.
Prior
to
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we applied Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) No.
25 in accounting for our employee stock compensation plans and generally
recognized no compensation expense for employee stock options. Under the
provisions of APB No. 25, we recognized a liability for Stock Appreciation
Rights (“SARS”) and Tandem Stock Appreciation Rights (“TSARS”) (collectively,
“Rights”) based upon the intrinsic value of vested SARS and TSARS at each period
end. Under SFAS No. 123(R), we are required to recognize a liability for vested
SARS and TSARS based upon their fair value at each period end using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model and to record a cumulative effect adjustment
for the change in method of accounting for such liability awards. The cumulative
effect resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) was insignificant and
is
included in stock based compensation expense for the current fiscal year.
Our
stock-based compensation plans are described in note 1 of the notes to
consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for
the fiscal year ended June 3, 2006. On August 24, 2006, in accordance with
provisions of our 2005 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (the “SARs Plan”), our
Board of Directors approved an amendment to the SARs Plan providing that
exercises under the SARs Plan be settled in cash and not with shares of our
common stock.
A
summary
of our equity award activity and related information for the twenty-six weeks
ended December 2, 2006 is as follows:
Number
|
Weighted
|
Weighted Average |
Aggregate
|
||||||||||
of
|
Exercise
Price
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
||||||||||
Options
|
Per
Share
|
Life
(in Years)
|
Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding,
June 3, 2006
|
473,400
|
$
|
4.97
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Outstanding,
December 2, 2006
|
473,400
|
$
|
4.97
|
7.84
|
$
|
1,415
|
|||||||
Exercisable,
December 2, 2006
|
159,840
|
$
|
3.71
|
6.71
|
$
|
680
|
7
The
number and weighted average grant-date fair value of non-vested equity awards
was as follows:
Weighted
|
|||||||
Number
|
Average
|
||||||
of
|
Grant-Date
Fair
|
||||||
Shares
|
Value
Per Share
|
||||||
Nonvested,
June 3, 2006
|
395,760
|
$
|
2.56
|
||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Vested
|
(82,200
|
)
|
2.52
|
||||
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Nonvested,
December 2, 2006
|
313,560
|
$
|
2.58
|
A
summary
of our liability award activity and related information for the twenty-six
weeks
ended December 2, 2006 is as follows:
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Average
|
||||||||||||
Number
|
Average
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
||||||||||
Of
|
Strike
Price
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
||||||||||
Rights
|
Per
Right
|
Life
(in Years)
|
Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding,
June 3, 2006
|
586,000
|
$
|
5.69
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
15,000
|
$
|
6.93
|
||||||||||
Exercised
|
4,500
|
$
|
8.29
|
||||||||||
Forfeited
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding,
December 2, 2006
|
596,500
|
$
|
5.72
|
8.44
|
$
|
1,336
|
|||||||
Exercisable,
December 2, 2006
|
143,300
|
$
|
4.93
|
7.54
|
$
|
435
|
The
fair
value of liability awards was estimated as of December 2, 2006 using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted-average
assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.4%; dividend yield of 1%; volatility
factor of the expected market price of our stock of 27.9%; and a
weighted-average expected life of the rights of 5 years.
2.
Inventories
Inventories
consisted of the following ( in thousands):
December
2,
2006
|
June
3,
2006
|
||||||
Flocks
|
$
|
38,144
|
$
|
39,092
|
|||
Eggs
|
5,637
|
3,820
|
|||||
Feed
and supplies
|
16,588
|
14,931
|
|||||
$
|
60,369
|
$
|
57,843
|
8
3.
Legal
Proceedings
We
are
defendants in certain legal actions. It is our opinion, based on advice of
legal
counsel, that the outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse
effect on our consolidated financial position or operations. Please refer to
Part II, Item 1, of this report for a description of certain pending legal
proceedings.
4.
Net
Income (Loss) per Common Share
Basic
income (loss) per share is based on the weighted average common shares
outstanding. Diluted income (loss) per share includes any dilutive effects
of
options and warrants. Options and warrants representing 121,400 shares were
excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the thirteen
and
twenty-six week periods ended November 26, 2005 because of the net loss for
the
periods.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This
report contains numerous forward-looking statements relating to our shell egg
business, including estimated production data, expected operating schedules,
expected capital costs and other operating data. Such forward-looking statements
are identified by the use of words such as "believes," "intends," "expects,"
"hopes," "may," "should," "plan," "projected," "contemplates," "anticipates"
or
similar words. Actual production, operating schedules, results of operations
and
other projections and estimates could differ materially from those projected
in
the forward-looking statements. The factors that could cause actual results
to
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements include
(i) the risk factors set forth under Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2006, (ii) the risks and hazards inherent
in
the shell egg business (including disease, pests, and weather conditions),
(iii)
changes in the market prices of shell eggs, and (iv) changes or obligations
that
could result from our future acquisition of new flocks or businesses. Readers
are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We
disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
OVERVIEW
Cal-Maine
Foods, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Company”) is primarily engaged in the
production, grading, packaging, marketing and distribution of fresh shell eggs.
Our fiscal year end is the Saturday closest to May 31.
Our
operations are fully integrated. At our facilities we hatch chicks, grow and
maintain flocks of pullets (young female chickens, usually under 20 weeks of
age), layers (mature female chickens) and breeders (male or female birds used
to
produce fertile eggs to be hatched for egg production flocks), manufacture
feed,
and produce, process and distribute shell eggs. We are the largest producer
and
marketer of shell eggs in the United States. We market the majority of our
shell
eggs in 30 states, primarily in the southwestern, southeastern, mid-western
and
mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. We market our shell eggs through
our
extensive distribution network to a diverse group of customers, including
national and regional grocery store chains, club stores, foodservice
distributors and egg product manufacturers.
We
currently produce approximately 75% of the total number of shell eggs sold
by
us, with approximately 10% of such total shell egg production being through
the
use of contract producers. Contract producers operate under agreements with
us
for the use of their facilities in the production of shell eggs by layers owned
by us. We own the shell eggs produced under these arrangements. Approximately
25% of the total number of shell eggs sold by us is purchased from outside
producers for resale, as needed, by us.
Our
operating income or loss is significantly affected by wholesale shell egg market
prices, which can fluctuate widely and are outside of our control. Retail sales
of shell eggs are generally greatest during the fall and winter months and
lowest during the summer months. Prices for shell eggs fluctuate in response
to
seasonal factors and a natural increase in egg production during the spring
and
early summer.
9
Our
cost
of production is materially affected by feed costs, which average about 55%
of
our total shell egg farm production cost. Changes in feed costs result in
changes in cost of goods sold. The cost of feed ingredients is affected by
a
number of supply and demand factors such as crop production and weather, and
other factors, such as the level of grain exports, over which we have little
or
no control.
The
acquisition of Hillandale, LLC and the financial consolidation of American
Egg
Products, LLC described above in Item 1 are collectively referred to below
as
the “Acquisitions".
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items from our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations expressed as a percentage of
net
sales.
Percentage
of Net Sales
|
|||||||||||||
13
Weeks Ended
|
26
Weeks Ended
|
||||||||||||
Dec.
2, 2006
|
Nov.
26, 2005
|
Dec.
2, 2006
|
Nov.
26, 2005
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
81.9
|
87.1
|
86.8
|
91.4
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
18.1
|
12.9
|
13.2
|
8.6
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general & administrative expense
|
10.5
|
12.1
|
11.4
|
12.7
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
7.6
|
.8
|
1.8
|
(4.1
|
)
|
||||||||
Other
expense
|
(.7
|
)
|
(1.5
|
)
|
(1.2
|
)
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|||||
Income
(loss) before taxes
|
6.9
|
(.7
|
)
|
.6
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|||||||
Income
tax (benefit)
|
2.3
|
(.2
|
)
|
.2
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
4.6
|
%
|
(.5
|
)%
|
.4
|
%
|
(4.0
|
)%
|
NET
SALES
Currently,
approximately 96% of our net sales consist of shell egg sales, 2% consisting
of
incidental feed sales to outside producers, with the remaining 2% balance
consisting of sales of egg products. Net sales for the second quarter of fiscal
2007 were $137.7 million, a decrease of $600,000, or .5%, compared to net sales
of $138.3 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Total dozens of eggs
sold decreased and egg selling prices increased in the current quarter as
compared with fiscal 2006. Dozens sold for the current quarter were 172.1
million dozen, a decrease of 16.8 million dozen, or 8.9% as compared to the
second quarter of fiscal 2006.The decrease in dozens sold is primarily
attributable to 17 weeks of operations of the Acquisitions included in the
quarter ended November 26, 2005 compared to 13 weeks of operations in the
current quarter. The operations of the Acquisitions were consolidated with
our
operations beginning July 29, 2005. Because all of the information to close
the
accounting records of the Acquisitions was not available, we did not include
the
financial statements of Hillandale, LLC in our consolidated financial statements
until the second fiscal quarter of 2006. In the current quarter, domestic demand
for shell eggs improved as
compared to a year ago, and overall egg production was approximately level
as
compared to a year ago. This resulted in higher shell egg selling prices during
the current quarter. Our net average selling price per dozen for the fiscal
2007
second quarter was $.765, compared to $.643 for the second quarter of fiscal
2006, an increase of 19.0%. The
net
average selling price is the blended price for all sizes and grades of shell
eggs, including non-graded egg sales, breaking stock and
undergrades.
Net
sales
for the twenty-six week period ended December 2, 2006 were $253.0 million,
an
increase of $35.0 million, or 16.1%, compared to net sales of $218.0 million
for
the fiscal 2006 twenty-six week period. Dozens sold for the current twenty-six
week period were 344.4 million compared to 324.4 million for fiscal 2006, an
increase of 20.0 million dozen, or 6.2%. The increase in dozens sold is
primarily due to the Acquisitions in the prior fiscal year. As in the current
quarter, favorable egg market conditions resulted in increased shell egg selling
prices. For the fiscal 2007 twenty-six week period, our net average selling
price per dozen was $.698, compared to $.607 per dozen for fiscal 2006, an
increase of $.091 per dozen, or 15.0%.
10
COST
OF
SALES
Cost
of
sales consists of costs directly related to production and processing of shell
eggs, including feed costs, and purchases of shell eggs from outside egg
producers. Total cost of sales for the second quarter ended December 2, 2006
was
$112.8 million, a decrease of $7.7 million, or 6.4%, as compared to the cost
of
sales of $120.5 million for the fiscal 2006 second quarter. This decrease is
the
net result of a decrease in dozens sold, offset by the higher cost of feed
ingredients and cost of shell eggs purchased from outside producers. Due to
the
increase in shell egg selling prices, outside egg purchase cost increased.
Feed
cost for the second quarter ended December 2, 2006 was $.229 per dozen, an
increase of 11.2%, as compared to the fiscal 2006 second quarter cost per dozen
of $.206. Other operating costs have increased slightly above last fiscal year.
Increases in shell egg selling prices offset an increase in feed ingredients
and
resulted in a net increase in gross profit from 12.9% of net sales for the
quarter ended November 26, 2005 to 18.1% of net sales the quarter ended December
2, 2006.
For
the
twenty-six week period ended December 2, 2006, total cost of sales was $219.7
million, an increase of $20.4 million, or 10.2%, as compared to cost of sales
of
$199.3 million for the twenty-six week period ended November 26, 2005. The
increase in cost of sales is the result of increased dozens sold, higher cost
of
eggs purchased from outside producers and an increase in the cost of feed
ingredients. Feed cost for the current twenty-six weeks was $.222 per dozen,
compared to $.212 per dozen for the twenty-six week period ended November 26,
2005, an increase of 4.7%. Gross profit increased to 13.2% of net sales for
the
twenty-six week period ended December 2, 2006 from 8.6% for the comparable
twenty-six week period ended November 26, 2005.
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling,
general and administrative expenses include costs of marketing, distribution,
accounting and corporate overhead. Selling, general and administrative expense
for the second quarter ended December 2, 2006 was $14.5 million, a decrease
of
$2.2 million, or 13.2%, as compared to $16.7 million for the quarter ended
November 26, 2005. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in
selling, general and administrative expenses of the Acquisitions attributable
to
the 17 weeks of operations of the Acquisitions included in the prior second
quarter On a cost per dozen sold basis, selling, general and administrative
expense was $.084 per dozen for the current quarter as compared to $.088 for
the
second quarter of fiscal 2006. As a percent of net sales, selling, general
and
administrative expense decreased from 12.1% for the second quarter of fiscal
2006 to 10.5% for the second quarter of fiscal 2007.
For
the
twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2006, selling, general and administrative
expense was $28.9 million, an increase of $1.3 million, or 4.7%, as compared
to
$27.6 million for the same period in fiscal 2006. In the twenty-six weeks ended
December 2, 2006, franchise fees and promotional expenses pertaining to our
increasing specialty egg business increased almost $1.0 million. In the fiscal
2006 period, approximately $400,000 was recovered in bad debts. Fuel expense
continues to be a major distribution cost increase. On a cost per dozen sold
basis, selling, general and administrative expense was $.084 for the current
twenty-six weeks as compared to $.085 for the comparable period last fiscal
year. As a percent of net sales, selling, general and administrative expense
decreased from 12.7% for the twenty-six weeks of fiscal 2006 to 11.4% for the
current comparable period in fiscal 2007.
OPERATING
INCOME (LOSS)
As
the
result of the above, operating income was $10.5 million for the second quarter
ended December 2, 2006, as compared to operating income of $1.1 million for
the
second quarter of fiscal 2006. As a percent of net sales, the current fiscal
2007 quarter had a 7.6% operating income, compared to 0.8% for the comparable
period in fiscal 2006.
11
For
the
twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2006, operating income was $4.4 million,
compared to operating loss of $8.9 million for the comparable period in fiscal
2006. As a percent of net sales, the current fiscal 2007 period had 1.8%
operating income, compared to 4.1% operating loss for the same period in fiscal
2006.
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE)
Other
income or expense consists of costs or income not directly charged to, or
related to, operations such as interest expense and equity in income from
affiliates. Other expense for the second quarter ended December 2, 2006 was
$940,000, a decrease of $1.2 million, as compared to $2.1 million for last
year’s second quarter. This net decrease for the second fiscal 2007 quarter was
primarily the result of a $530,000 decrease in net interest expense and a
$632,000 increase in other income. Net interest decreased due to lower long-term
borrowing balances. Other income increased due to equity in income of
affiliates. As a percent of net sales, other expense was .7% for the twenty-six
weeks ended December 2, 2006, compared to 1.5% for the comparable period last
year.
For
the
twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2006, other expense was $2.9 million, a
decrease of $1.4 million as compared to an expense of $4.2 million for the
comparable period in fiscal 2006. For the current fiscal 2007 period, net
interest expense decreased $431,000, primarily due to lower borrowing balances
and an increase in interest income. Other income increased $840,000 from equity
in income of affiliates. As a percent of net sales, other expense was 1.2%
for
the current fiscal 2007 period, as compared to 1.9% for the comparable period
in
fiscal 2006.
INCOME
TAXES
As
a
result of the above, the pre-tax income was $9.6 million for the quarter ended
December 2, 2006, compared to pre-tax loss of $1.0 million for last year’s
comparable quarter. For the second 2007 fiscal quarter, income tax expense
of
$3.2 million was recorded with an effective tax rate of 33.0%, as compared
to an
income tax benefit of $337,000 with an effective rate of 33.0% for last year’s
comparable quarter.
For
the
twenty-six week period ended December 2, 2006, pre-tax income was $1.6 million,
compared to pre-tax loss of $13.1 million for the comparable period in fiscal
2006. For the current fiscal 2007 twenty-six week period, income tax expense
of
$586,000 was recorded with an effective tax rate of 37.7%, as compared to an
income tax benefit of $4.3 million, with an effective rate of 33.0% for last
year’s comparable period. Our effective tax rate differs from the federal
statutory income tax rate of 35% due to state income taxes and certain items
included in income for financial reporting purposes that are not included in
taxable income or loss for income tax purposes, including tax exempt interest
income, certain stock option expense and 36% of the Acquisitions’ profits and
losses held by its minority owners.
NET
INCOME (LOSS)
Net
income for the second quarter ended December 2, 2006 was $6.4 million, or $0.27
per basic and diluted share, compared to net loss of $685,000 million, or $0.03
per basic and diluted share for fiscal 2006.
For
the
twenty-six week period ended December 2, 2006, net income was $970,000, or
$0.04
per basic and diluted share, compared to a fiscal 2006 net loss of $8.8 million,
or $0.37 per basic share and diluted share.
CAPITAL
RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Our
working capital at December 2, 2006 was $53.7 million compared to $60.8 million
at June 3, 2006. Our current ratio was 1.72 at December 2, 2006 as compared
with
1.94 at June 3, 2006. Our need for working capital generally is highest in
the
last and first fiscal quarters ending in May and August, respectively, when
egg
prices are normally at seasonal lows. Seasonal borrowing needs frequently are
higher during these quarters than during other fiscal quarters. We have a $40.0
million line of credit with three banks, $2.7 million of which was utilized
for
a standby letter of credit at December 2, 2006. Our long-term debt at December
2, 2006, including current maturities, amounted to $103.6 million, as compared
to $103.9 million at June 3, 2006.
12
For
the
twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2006, $2.3 million in net cash was provided
by operating activities. This compares to net cash used in operating activities
of $12.7 million for the 26 weeks ended November 26, 2005. For the twenty-six
weeks ended December 2, 2006, $15.0 million was provided from the reduction
of
short-term investments and $470,000 was used for notes receivable and
investments. Approximately $277,000 was provided from disposal of property,
plant and equipment, $12.1 million was used for purchases of property, plant
and
equipment and $6.1 million was used for payment on the purchase obligation
for
the Acquisitions. Borrowings of $3.0 million were received in additional
long-term debt and approximately $585,000 was used for payments of dividends
on
the common stock and $3.3 million was used for principal payments on long-term
debt. The net result of these activities was a decrease in cash and cash
equivalents of $1.9 million since June 3, 2006.
For
the
twenty-six weeks ended November 26, 2005, approximately $26.4 million was
provided from the reduction of short-term investments and $914,000 was provided
from notes receivable and investments. Approximately $1.5 million was provided
from disposal of property, plant and equipment, $2.8 million was used for
purchases of property, plant and equipment and $23.8 million was used for the
purchase of the Acquisitions. Borrowings of $28.0 million were received in
additional long-term debt and approximately $584,000 was used for payments
of
dividends on the common stock and $24.2 million was used for principal payments
on long-term debt. The net result of these activities was a decrease in cash
and
cash equivalents of $7.3 million since May 28, 2005.
Substantially
all trade receivables and inventories collateralize our revolving line of credit
and property, plant and equipment collateralize our long-term debt under our
loan agreements with our lenders. Unless otherwise approved by our lenders,
we
are required by provisions of these loan agreements to (1) maintain minimum
levels of working capital (ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1) and net worth
(minimum of $90.0 million tangible net worth); (2) limit dividends to an
aggregate amount not to exceed $500,000 per quarter (allowed if no default),
capital expenditures (not to exceed depreciation for the same four fiscal
quarters), lease obligations and additional long-term borrowings (total funded
debt to total capitalization not to exceed 55%); and (3) maintain various
cash-flow coverage ratios (1.25 to 1), among other restrictions. At December
2,
2006, we were in compliance with the provisions of all loan agreements. Under
certain of the loan agreements, the lenders have the option to require the
prepayment of any outstanding borrowings in the event we undergo a change in
control.
Under
the
terms of our Agreement with Hillandale and the Hillandale shareholders, a new
Florida limited liability company named Hillandale, LLC was formed. In fiscal
2006, we purchased 51% of the Units of Membership in Hillandale, LLC, with
the
remaining Units to be acquired in essentially equal annual installments over
a
four-year period. The purchase price of the Units is equal to their book value
as calculated in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. In fiscal 2007,
we
purchased, pursuant to the Agreement, an additional 13% of the Units of
Membership for $6.1 million from our cash balances. We have recorded the
obligation to acquire the remaining 36% at its present value of $14.9 million.
The actual remaining purchase price may be higher or lower when the acquisitions
are completed. Future funding is expected to be provided by our cash balances
and borrowings under our revolving credit agreement.
We
currently have a $1.9 million deferred tax liability due to a subsidiary's
change from a cash basis to an accrual basis taxpayer on May 29, 1988. The
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 provides that this liability is payable ratably
over
the 20 years beginning in fiscal 1999. However, such taxes will be due in their
entirety in the first fiscal year in which there is a change in ownership
control so that we no longer qualify as a "family farming corporation." We
are
currently making annual payments of approximately $150,000 related to this
liability. However, while these current payments reduce cash balances, payment
of the $1.9 million deferred tax liability would not impact our consolidated
statement of operations or stockholders' equity, as these taxes have been
accrued and are reflected on our consolidated balance sheet.
Impact
of Recently Issued Accounting Standards.
In
November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB
No. 43, Chapter 4.” SFAS No. 151 amends Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle
facility expense, freight handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) should
be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires
that allocation of fixed production overhead to inventory be based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities during fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2005. We adopted SFAS No. 151 in the first quarter of
fiscal
2007
and
it did
not
have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial position
or
cash flows.
13
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),
"Share-Based Payment," which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation." SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", and amends SFAS
No. 95, "Statement of Cash Flows". SFAS No. 123(R) requires all
share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options,
restricted stock and performance-based shares to be recognized in the income
statement based on their fair values. SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the
benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be
reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as
required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating
cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption.
In
the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the
modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation
cost will be recognized for all share-based payments granted after the adoption
of SFAS No. 123(R) and for all awards granted to employees prior to the
adoption date of SFAS No. 123R that remain unvested on the adoption date.
Accordingly, no restatements were made to prior periods.
Prior
to
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we applied APB No. 25 in accounting for our
employee stock compensation plans and generally recognized no compensation
expense for employee stock options. Under the provisions of APB No. 25, we
recognized a liability for Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARS”) and Tandem Stock
Appreciation Rights (“TSARS”) based upon the intrinsic value of vested SARS and
TSARS at each period end. Under SFAS No. 123(R), we are required to recognize
a
liability for vested SARS and TSARS based upon their fair value at each period
end using a Black-Scholes option pricing model and to record a cumulative effect
adjustment for the change in method of accounting for such liability awards.
The
cumulative effect resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) was
insignificant and is included in stock based compensation expense for fiscal
2007.
On
July
13, 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for "Uncertainty
in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109".
Interpretation 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in a company's financial statements in accordance with Statement
109
and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial
statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax
return. Additionally, Interpretation 48 provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. Interpretation 48 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006, with early adoption permitted. We are
currently evaluating whether the adoption of Interpretation 48 will have a
material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations
or
cash flows.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No.157, Fair Value Measurements
(“FAS 157”). FAS 157 establishes a single authoritative definition of fair
value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and expands on required
disclosures about fair value measurement. FAS 157 is effective for us on June
1,
2008 and will be applied prospectively. The provisions of FAS 157 are not
expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Critical
Accounting Policies.
We
suggest that our Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, as described in
Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Cal-Maine
Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries annual report on Form10-K for the fiscal year
ended
June 3, 2006, be read in conjunction with this Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There have been
no
changes to critical accounting policies identified in our Annual Report on
Form
10-K for the year ended June 3, 2006.
ITEM
3.
QUANTATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There
have been no material changes in the market risk reported in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2006.
14
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance
that information we are required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and
forms. Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures
conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, together
with other financial officers, such officers concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by
this report. There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified
in
connection with the evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter
that
has significantly affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our
internal controls over financial reporting.
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Except
as
noted below, there have been no new matters or changes to matters discussed
in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 3, 2006.
Chicken
Litter Litigation
Cal-Maine
Farms, Inc.(“Cal-Maine Farms”), one of our subsidiaries, is presently a
defendant in two personal injury cases in the Circuit Court of Washington
County, Arkansas. Those cases are styled, McWhorter vs. Alpharma, Inc.,
et
al.
(“McWhorter”), and Carroll, et
al.
vs.
Alpharma, Inc., et
al.
(“Carroll”). Cal-Maine Farms was named as a defendant in the McWhorter case on
February 3, 2004, and as a defendant in the Carroll case on May 2, 2005.
Co-defendants in both cases include other integrated poultry companies such
as
Tyson Foods, Inc., Cargill, Incorporated, George’s Farms, Inc., Peterson Farms,
Inc., Simmons Foods, Inc., and Simmons Poultry Farms, Inc. Alpharma, Inc. and
Alpharma Animal Health, Co., manufacturers of an additive for broiler feed
also
are included as defendants.
Both
cases allege that the plaintiffs have suffered medical problems resulting from
living near land upon which “litter” from the defendants’ flocks was spread as
fertilizer. The McWhorter case focuses on mold and fungi allegedly created
by
the application of litter. The Carroll case also alleges injury from mold and
fungi, but focuses primarily on the broiler feed ingredient as the cause of
the
alleged medical injuries.
Several
other separate, but related, cases were prosecuted in the same venue by the
same
attorneys. The same theories of liability were prosecuted in all of the cases.
No Cal-Maine company was named as a defendant in any of those other cases.
The
plaintiffs selected one of those cases, Green, et
al.
vs.
Alpharma, Inc., et
al.,
as a
bellwether case to go to trial first. All of the poultry defendants were granted
summary judgment in the Green case on August 2, 2006. The case against the
Alpharma defendants resulted in a verdict for the defendants on September 25,
2006. The result in the Green case is not dispositive of the issues raised
in
McWhorter and Carroll, but it clearly colors the plaintiffs’ prospects for
success.
The
plaintiffs’ attorneys have not yet indicated their intentions regarding the
remaining cases. It is possible that the McWhorter and Carroll plaintiffs can
present fundamentally different proof than was presented in the Green case,
but
that does not appear likely at present. While the potential exposure, if any,
in
the McWhorter and Carroll cases appears to be diminished as a result of the
outcome in the Green case, but at this point it is still not possible to
evaluate any potential exposure with certainty.
15
State
of Oklahoma Watershed Pollution Litigation
On
June
18, 2005, the State of Oklahoma filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Oklahoma against a number of companies including us and
Cal-Maine Farms. An Answer on behalf of us and Cal-Maine Farms was filed on
October 3, 2005. The State of Oklahoma claims that through the disposal of
chicken litter the defendants have polluted the Illinois River Watershed. This
watershed provides water to eastern Oklahoma. The Complaint seeks injunctive
relief and monetary damages. We no longer have any operations in the Illinois
River Watershed. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that we will be materially
affected by any injunctive relief granted or monetary damages
awarded.
The
Court
has under advisement motions to dismiss filed by all defendants. Merit discovery
is underway. We presently are not able to provide an opinion regarding the
ultimate resolution of this action.
ITEM
1A. RISK
FACTORS
There
have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the
Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2006.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The
Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on October 5,
2006.
The
following persons were nominated and elected to serve as members of the Board
of
Directors until our next annual meeting of shareholders and until their
successors are elected and qualified. Fred R. Adams, Jr. (40,612,051 votes
for
and 915,071 votes withheld), Richard K. Looper (40,599,990 votes for and 927,132
votes withheld), Adolphus B. Baker (40,650,591 votes for and 876,531 votes
withheld), James E. Poole (41,434,611 votes for and 92,511 votes withheld),
R.
Faser Triplett (40,387,236 votes for and 139,386 votes withheld), Letitia C.
Hughes (41,398,572 votes for and 128,550 votes withheld), and Timothy A. Dawson
(40,648,380 votes for and 878,742 votes withheld).
No
other
matters were voted upon at the annual meeting.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
On
August
24, 2006, in accordance with provisions of our 2005 Stock Appreciation Rights
Plan (the “SARs Plan”), our Board of Directors approved an amendment to the SARs
Plan providing that exercises under the SARs Plan be settled in cash and not
with shares of our common stock.
On
January 3, 2007, we issued a press release announcing our financial results
for
the quarter ended December 2, 2006.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
No.
|
Description
|
|
10.15
|
Loan
Agreement, dated as of November 13, 2006, between Metropolitan Life
Insurance
|
|
Company
and Cal-Maine Foods Inc. (without exhibits)
|
||
31.1
|
Certification
of The Chief Executive Officer
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of The Chief Financial Officer
|
|
32.0
|
Written
Statement of The Chief Executive Officer and The Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
99.1
|
Press
release dated January 2, 2007 announcing interim period financial
information
|
|
|
(Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our Form 8-K dated January 3, 2007.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
Date:
January 8, 2007
|
/s/
Timothy A.
Dawson
|
|
Timothy
A. Dawson
|
||
Vice
President/Treasurer
|
||
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
||
Date:
January 8, 2007
|
/s/
Charles F.
Collins
|
|
Charles
F. Collins
|
||
Vice
President/Controller
|
||
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
17