CAL-MAINE FOODS INC - Quarter Report: 2006 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(mark
one)
x
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act
of 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended September 2, 2006
OR
o
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act
of 1934
For
the
transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission
file number: 000-04892
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
64-0500378
|
|
(State
or other Jurisdiction
of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification
No.)
|
|
Incorporation
or
Organization)
|
3320
Woodrow Wilson Avenue, Jackson, Mississippi 39209
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip
Code)
(601)
948-6813
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
Accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-
Accelerated filer o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
x
No
o
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock
(exclusive of treasury shares), as of September 29, 2006.
Common
Stock, $0.01 par
value
|
21,102,891
shares
|
|
Class
A Common Stock, $0.01 par
value
|
2,400,000
shares
|
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Part
I.
|
Financial
Information
|
Page
Number
|
||
Item
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
3
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets - September 2, 2006 and June 3,
2006
|
3
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations - Thirteen Weeks Ended September
2,
2006 and August 27, 2005
|
4
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow - Thirteen Weeks Ended September
2,
2006 and August 27, 2005
|
5
|
|||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
|||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
9
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures of Market Risk
|
14
|
||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
14
|
||
Part
II.
|
Other
Information
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
14
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
15
|
||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
15
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
16
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
16
|
||
Signatures
|
17
|
2
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share amounts)
September
2,
2006
|
June
3,
2006
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
(note
1)
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
16,717
|
$
|
13,295
|
|||
Investments
|
10,000
|
25,000
|
|||||
Trade
and other receivables
|
30,753
|
24,955
|
|||||
Recoverable
federal and state income taxes
|
3,596
|
1,177
|
|||||
Inventories
|
57,310
|
57,843
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
2,403
|
3,408
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
120,779
|
125,678
|
|||||
Notes
receivable and investments
|
7,975
|
8,316
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
4,016
|
4,016
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
2,700
|
2,833
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
340,870
|
339,831
|
|||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(167,887
|
)
|
(163,556
|
)
|
|||
172,983
|
176,275
|
||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
308,453
|
$
|
317,118
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
42,539
|
$
|
34,642
|
|||
Current
maturities of purchase obligation
|
5,435
|
6,884
|
|||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
12,248
|
11,902
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
11,895
|
11,450
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
72,117
|
64,878
|
|||||
Long-term
debt, less current maturities
|
90,004
|
92,010
|
|||||
Minority
interest
|
782
|
919
|
|||||
Purchase
obligation, less current maturities
|
9,284
|
16,751
|
|||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
3,890
|
3,860
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
18,280
|
18,925
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
194,357
|
197,343
|
|||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock $0.01 par value per share:
|
|||||||
Authorized
shares - 60,000
|
|||||||
Issued
and outstanding shares - 35,130 at September 2, 2006 and June 3,
2006
|
351
|
351
|
|||||
Class
A common stock $0.01 par value, authorized, issued and outstanding
2,400 shares at September 2, 2006 and June 3, 2006
|
24
|
24
|
|||||
Paid-in
capital
|
28,755
|
28,700
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
106,449
|
112,183
|
|||||
Common
stock in treasury-14,027 shares at September 2, 2006 and
at June 3, 2006
|
(21,483
|
)
|
(21,483
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
114,096
|
119,775
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
308,453
|
$
|
317,118
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
13
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||
September
2,
2006
|
August
27,
2005
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
115,308
|
$
|
79,756
|
|||
Cost
of sales
|
106,901
|
78,796
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
8,407
|
960
|
|||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
14,470
|
10,917
|
|||||
Operating
loss
|
(6,063
|
)
|
(9,957
|
)
|
|||
Other
income (expense):
|
|||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(1,795
|
)
|
(1,695
|
)
|
|||
Other
|
(143
|
)
|
(449
|
)
|
|||
(1,938
|
)
|
(2,144
|
)
|
||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
(8,001
|
)
|
(12,101
|
)
|
|||
Income
tax benefit
|
(2,570
|
)
|
(3,993
|
)
|
|||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(5,431
|
)
|
$
|
(8,108
|
)
|
|
Net
loss per common share:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
(.23
|
)
|
$
|
(.35
|
)
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
(.23
|
)
|
$
|
(.35
|
)
|
|
Dividends
per common share
|
$
|
.0125
|
$
|
.0125
|
|||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
23,503
|
23,490
|
|||||
Diluted
|
23,503
|
23,490
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated
financial statements.
4
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
(unaudited)
13
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||
September
2,
2006
|
August
27,
2005
|
||||||
Cash
provided by (used in) operations
|
$
|
2,138
|
$
|
(8,227
|
)
|
||
Investing
activities:
|
|||||||
Net
decrease in investments
|
15,000
|
14,389
|
|||||
Purchases
of property, plant and equipment
|
(5,238
|
)
|
(1,649
|
)
|
|||
Payments
received on notes receivable and from investments
|
328
|
1,418
|
|||||
Increase
in notes receivable and investments
|
(1,030
|
)
|
(552
|
)
|
|||
Net
proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
277
|
1,540
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
9,337
|
15,146
|
|||||
Financing
activities:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock from treasury
|
-
|
46
|
|||||
Payment
of purchase obligation
|
(6,101
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Principal
payments on long-term debt
|
(1,660
|
)
|
(1,708
|
)
|
|||
Payments
of dividends
|
(292
|
)
|
(292
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(8,053
|
)
|
(1,954
|
)
|
|||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
3,422
|
4,965
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
13,295
|
20,221
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
16,717
|
$
|
25,186
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(in
thousands, except share amounts)
September
2, 2006
(unaudited)
1. Presentation
of Interim Information
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting
of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the thirteen weeks ended September
2,
2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the
year ending June 2, 2007.
The
balance sheet at June 3, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date but does not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements.
For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.'s annual report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2006.
Hillandale
Acquisition
On
July 28,
2005, we entered into an Agreement to Form a Limited Liability Company with
Hillandale Farms, Inc. and Hillandale Farms of Florida, Inc. (together,
“Hillandale”), and the Hillandale shareholders (the “Agreement”). Under the
terms of the Agreement, we acquired 51% of the Units of Membership in
Hillandale, LLC for cash of approximately $27 million on October 12, 2005,
with
the remaining 49% of the Units of Membership to be acquired in essentially
equal
annual installments over a four-year period. The purchase price of the Units
equals their book value at the time of purchase as calculated under the terms
of
the Agreement.
In
August
2006,
in
accordance with the Agreement, we
purchased, for $6.1 million, an additional 13% of the Units of Hillandale,
LLC
based on their book value as of July 29, 2006. Our ownership of Hillandale,
LLC
currently is 64%. Our obligation to acquire the remaining 36% of Hillandale,
LLC
is recorded at its present value of $14.7 million as of September 2, 2006,
of
which $5.4 million is included in current liabilities and $9.3 million is
included in other non-current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet. We will purchase an additional 12% of Hillandale LLC based on
the
book value of the Membership Units as of July 29, 2007.
Prior
to the
acquisition of our Units of Membership in Hillandale, LLC, we had a 44%
membership interest in American Egg Products, LLC (“AEP”) and Hillandale, LLC
had a 27.5% membership interest in AEP. Prior to the acquisition of Hillandale,
LLC, our membership interest in AEP was accounted for by the equity method.
Effective with our acquisition of Hillandale, LLC, we own a majority of the
membership interests in AEP. Accordingly, the financial statements of AEP have
been consolidated with our financial statements effective July 29,
2005.
We
gained
effective control of the Hillandale, LLC operations upon signing of the
Agreement. Accordingly, the acquisition date for accounting purposes was July
28, 2005. The operations of Hillandale, LLC were consolidated with our
operations beginning July 29, 2005. Because all of the information to close
the
accounting records of Hillandale, LLC was not available at August 27, 2005,
we
did not include the financial statements of Hillandale, LLC in our consolidated
financial statements until the second fiscal quarter of 2006.
6
The
unaudited
financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of
our
operations and Hillandale, LLC, on a pro forma basis, as though we had been
combined as of the beginning of the earliest period presented. The pro forma
financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not
indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the
acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the earliest period
presented.
13
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||
Sept.
2, 2006
|
Aug.
25, 2005
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
115,308
|
$
|
92,730
|
|||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(5,431
|
)
|
$
|
(12,264
|
)
|
|
Basic
net loss per share
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
$
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
Diluted
net loss per share
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
$
|
(0.52
|
)
|
Stock
Based Compensation
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),
"Share-Based Payment," which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation." SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", and amends SFAS
No. 95, "Statement of Cash Flows". SFAS No. 123(R) requires all
share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options,
restricted stock and performance-based shares to be recognized in the income
statement based on their fair values. SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the
benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be
reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as
required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating
cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption.
In
the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the
modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation
cost will be recognized for all share-based payments granted after the adoption
of SFAS No. 123(R) and for all awards granted to employees prior to the
adoption date of SFAS No. 123R that remain unvested on the adoption date.
Accordingly, no restatements were made to prior periods. We recognized stock
based compensation expense of $160 for the thirteen week period ended September
2, 2006.
Prior
to
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we applied APB No. 25 in accounting for our
employee stock compensation plans and generally recognized no compensation
expense for employee stock options. Under the provisions of APB No. 25, we
recognized a liability for Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARS”) and Tandem Stock
Appreciation Rights (“TSARS”) based upon the intrinsic value of vested SARS and
TSARS at each period end. Under SFAS No. 123(R), we are required to recognize
a
liability for vested SARS and TSARS based upon their fair value at each period
end using a Black-Scholes option pricing model and to record a cumulative effect
adjustment for the change in method of accounting for such liability awards.
The
cumulative effect resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) was
insignificant and is included in stock based compensation expense for the
thirteen week period ended September 2, 2006.
7
Our
stock-based compensation plans are described in note 1 of the consolidated
financial statements included in our Annual Report of Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended June 3, 2006. These plans have not been modified in the 2007 fiscal
year.
A
summary
of our equity award activity and related information for the thirteen weeks
ended September 2, 2006 is as follows:
Number
of Options
|
Weighted
Exercise Price Per Share
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding,
June 3, 2006
|
473,400
|
$
|
4.97
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Outstanding,
September 2, 2006
|
473,400
|
$
|
4.97
|
8.09
|
$
|
1,003
|
|||||||
Exercisable,
September 2, 2006
|
159,840
|
$
|
3.71
|
6.96
|
$
|
541
|
The
number and weighted average grant-date fair value of nonvested equity awards
was
as follows:
Number
of Shares
|
Weighted
Average Grant-Date Fair Value Per Share
|
||||||
Nonvested,
June 3, 2006
|
395,760
|
$
|
2.56
|
||||
Granted
during quarter
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Vested
during quarter
|
(82,200
|
)
|
2.52
|
||||
Forfeited
during quarter
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Nonvested,
September 2, 2006
|
313,560
|
$
|
2.58
|
A
summary
of our liability award activity and related information for the thirteen weeks
ended September 2, 2006 is as follows:
Number
Of Rights
|
Weighted
Average Strike Price Per Right
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding,
June 3, 2006
|
586,000
|
$
|
5.69
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
15,000
|
6.93
|
|||||||||||
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Outstanding,
September 2, 2006
|
601,000
|
$
|
5.72
|
8.69
|
$
|
822
|
|||||||
Exercisable,
September 2, 2006
|
144,200
|
$
|
4.93
|
7.79
|
$
|
311
|
8
The
fair
value of liability awards was estimated as of September 2, 2006 using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted-average
assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.7%; dividend yield of 1%; volatility
factor of the expected market price of our stock of 51.4%; and a
weighted-average expected life of the rights of 5 years.
2.
Inventories
Inventories
consisted of the following:
September
2,
2006
|
June
3,
2006
|
||||||
Flocks
|
$
|
38,626
|
$
|
39,092
|
|||
Eggs
|
3,895
|
3,820
|
|||||
Feed
and supplies
|
14,789
|
14,931
|
|||||
$
|
57,310
|
$
|
57,843
|
3.
Legal
Proceeding
We
are
defendants in certain legal actions. It is our opinion, based on advice of
legal
counsel, that the outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse
effect on our consolidated financial position or operations. Please refer to
Part II, Item 1, of this report for description of certain pending legal
proceedings.
4.
Net
Loss per Common Share
Basic
loss per share is based on the weighted average common shares outstanding.
Diluted loss per share includes any dilutive effects of options and warrants.
Options and warrants representing 473,400
shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for
the
thirteen week period ended September 2, 2006 because they would be anti-dilutive
since we had a net loss for the period.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This
report contains numerous forward-looking statements relating to our shell egg
business, including estimated production data, expected operating schedules,
expected capital costs and other operating data. Such forward-looking statements
are identified by the use of words such as "believes," "intends," "expects,"
"hopes," "may," "should," "plan," "projected," "contemplates," "anticipates"
or
similar words. Actual production, operating schedules, results of operations
and
other projections and estimates could differ materially from those projected
in
the forward-looking statements. The factors that could cause actual results
to
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements include
(i) the risk factors set forth under Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2006, (ii) the risks and hazards inherent
in
the shell egg business (including disease, pests, and weather conditions),
(iii)
changes in the market prices of shell eggs, and (iv) changes or obligations
that
could result from our future acquisition of new flocks or businesses. Readers
are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We
disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
9
OVERVIEW
Cal-Maine
Foods, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Company”) is primarily engaged in the
production, grading, packaging, marketing and distribution of fresh shell eggs.
Our fiscal year end is the Saturday closest to May 31.
Our
operations are fully integrated. At our facilities we hatch chicks, grow and
maintain flocks of pullets (young female chickens, usually under 20 weeks of
age), layers (mature female chickens) and breeders (male or female birds used
to
produce fertile eggs to be hatched for egg production flocks), manufacture
feed,
and produce, process and distribute shell eggs. We are the largest producer
and
marketer of shell eggs in the United States. We market the majority of our
shell
eggs in 30 states, primarily in the southwestern, southeastern, mid-western
and
mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. We market our shell eggs through
our
extensive distribution network to a diverse group of customers, including
national and regional grocery store chains, club stores, foodservice
distributors and egg product manufacturers.
We
currently produce approximately 75% of the total number of shell eggs sold
by
us, with approximately 10% of such total shell egg production being through
the
use of contract producers. Contract producers operate under agreements with
us
for the use of their facilities in the production of shell eggs by layers owned
by us. We own the shell eggs produced under these arrangements. Approximately
25% of the total number of shell eggs sold by us is purchased from outside
producers for resale, as needed, by us.
Our
operating income or loss is significantly affected by wholesale shell egg market
prices, which can fluctuate widely and are outside of our control. Retail sales
of shell eggs are generally greatest during the fall and winter months and
lowest during the summer months. Prices for shell eggs fluctuate in response
to
seasonal factors and a natural increase in egg production during the spring
and
early summer.
Our
cost
of production is materially affected by feed costs, which average about 55%
of
our total shell egg production cost. Changes in feed costs result in changes
in
cost of goods sold. The cost of feed ingredients is affected by a number of
supply and demand factors such as crop production and weather, and other
factors, such as the level of grain exports, over which we have little or no
control.
The acquisition of Hillandale, LLC and the financial consolidation of American
Egg Products, LLC described above in Item 1 are collectively referred to below
as the “Acquisitions".
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items from our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations expressed as a percentage of
net
sales.
Percentage
of Net Sales
|
|||||||
13
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||
September
2,
2006
|
August
27,
2005
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||
Cost
of sales
|
92.7
|
98.8
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
7.3
|
1.2
|
|||||
Selling,
general & administrative
|
12.5
|
13.7
|
|||||
Operating
loss
|
(5.2
|
)
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|||
Other
expense
|
(1.7
|
)
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|||
Loss
before taxes
|
(6.9
|
)
|
(15.2
|
)
|
|||
Income
tax benefit
|
(
2.2
|
)
|
(
5.0
|
)
|
|||
Net
loss
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
(10.2
|
)%
|
10
NET
SALES
Approximately
95% of our net sales consist of shell egg sales and approximately 2% was for
incidental feed sales to outside egg producers, with the 3% balance consisting
of sales of egg products. Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 were
$115.3 million, an increase of $35.5 million, or 44.5%, as compared to net
sales
of $79.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2006. As discussed above,
there
was no financial data concerning the Acquisitions included in the first quarter
of fiscal 2006. For the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Acquisitions accounted
for $17.8 million of the increase in net sales. Excluding the Acquisitions,
on a
comparable basis, net sales increased $17.7 million, or 22.0%. Total eggs sold
and egg selling prices increased in the current fiscal 2007 quarter as compared
to the same fiscal 2006 quarter. Dozens sold for the 2007 current quarter were
171.6 million dozen, including 25.4 million dozen sold by the Acquisitions,
an
increase of 36.1 million dozen, or 26.7%, as compared to the first quarter
of
fiscal 2006. On a comparable basis, excluding the Acquisitions, dozens sold
increased 10.7 million dozen, or 7.9%. Our net average selling price per dozen
for the fiscal 2007 first quarter was $.633, compared to $.555 for the first
quarter of fiscal 2006, an increase of 14.1%. Our net average selling price
is
the blended price for all sizes and grades of shell eggs, including non-graded
egg sales, breaking stock and undergrades. During the first quarter of fiscal
2006, consumer demand decreased while egg supply continued at higher levels,
resulting in a drop in egg selling prices. For the first quarter of fiscal
2007,
there is a fully adequate egg supply to meet a fairly good demand, resulting
in
improved egg selling prices as compared to fiscal 2006.
COST
OF
SALES
Cost
of
sales consists of costs directly related to production and processing of shell
eggs, including feed costs, and purchases of shell eggs from outside egg
producers. Cost of sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was $106.9
million, an increase of $28.1 million, or 35.7%, as compared to the cost of
sales of 78.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The Acquisitions’
cost of sales for the first quarter accounted for $19.2 million of the increase.
On a comparable basis, excluding the Acquisitions, cost of sales increased
$8.9
million, or 11.3%. The increase is due to increases in dozen sold, provided
by
increased outside purchases, and in the cost of purchases from outside egg
producers. Feed cost remained approximately the same. Following the increase
in
egg selling prices, the cost of outside purchases increased. Feed cost per
dozen
for the fiscal 2007 first quarter was $.216, compared to $.219 per dozen for
the
comparable fiscal 2006 first quarter. The increase in egg selling prices
exceeded the increase in cost of sales and resulted in an increase in gross
profit from 1.2% of net sales for the quarter ended August 27, 2005 to 7.3%
of
net sales for the current quarter ended September 2, 2006.
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling,
general and administrative expenses include costs of marketing, distribution,
accounting and corporate overhead. Selling, general and administrative expense
for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was $14.5 million, an increase of $3.6
million as compared to the expense of $10.9 million for the first quarter of
fiscal 2006. The Acquisitions’ selling, general and administrative expense
accounted for $2.7 million of the increase. Excluding the Acquisitions, on
a
comparable basis, selling, general and administrative expense increased
$900,000, or 8.25%. The increase is due to increases in payroll expenses and
franchise fees on specialty egg sales. Excluding the cost of fuel, delivery
costs generally decreased. On a cost per dozen sold basis, selling, general
and
administrative expense increased slightly from $.081 per dozen for the first
quarter of fiscal 2006 to $.084 per dozen for the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
As a percent of net sales, selling, general and administrative expense decreased
from 13.7% for fiscal 2006 first quarter to 12.5% for fiscal 2007 first
quarter.
OPERATING
LOSS
As
a
result of the above, the operating loss was $6.1 million for the first quarter
of fiscal 2007, as compared to operating loss of $9.9 million for the fiscal
2006 first quarter. As a percent of net sales, the first fiscal 2007 quarter
had
an operating loss of 5.2% of net sales, compared to an operating loss of 12.5%
of net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
11
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE)
Other income or expense consists of costs or income not directly charged to,
or
related to, operations such as interest expense and equity in income (loss)
of
affiliates. Other expense for the first quarter ended September 2, 2006 was
$1.9
million, a decrease of $200,000, as compared to $2.1 million for the quarter
ended August 27, 2005. For the first quarter of fiscal 2007, net interest
expense increased $100,000 and other expense decreased $300,000, as compared
to
the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Although debt balances were lower for the
first fiscal 2007 quarter as compared to the first fiscal 2006 quarter, net
interest expense increased due to non-cash interest expense imputed on our
non-interest bearing obligation to acquire the remaining membership units in
Hillandale, LLC. Other expense decreased due to lower equity in the losses
of
affiliates. As a percent of net sales, other expense decreased from 2.7% for
fiscal 2006 first quarter to 1.7% for fiscal 2007 first quarter.
INCOME
TAXES
As
a
result of the above, we had a pre-tax loss of $8.0 million for the quarter
ended
September 2, 2006, as compared to a pre-tax loss of $12.1 million for the
quarter ended August 27, 2005. For the fiscal 2007 first quarter, an income
tax
benefit of $2.6 million was recorded with an effective tax rate of 32.1%, as
compared to an income tax benefit of $4.0 million with an effective tax rate
of
33.0% for the fiscal 2006 first quarter.
NET
LOSS
As
a
result of the above, the net loss for the first quarter ended September 2,
2006
was $5.4 million, or $.23 per basic and diluted share, compared to a net loss
of
$8.1 million, or $.35 per basic and diluted share for the quarter ended August
27, 2005. As a percent of net sales, the net loss was 4.7% for the quarter
ended
September 2, 2006, compared to a net loss of 10.2% for the quarter ended August
27, 2005.
CAPITAL
RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Our
working capital at September 2, 2006 was $48.7 million compared to $60.8 million
at June 3, 2006. Our current ratio was 1.67 at September 2, 2006 as compared
with 1.94 at June 3, 2006. Our need for working capital generally is highest
in
the last and first fiscal quarters ending in May and August, respectively,
when
egg prices are normally at seasonal lows. Seasonal borrowing needs frequently
are higher during these quarters than during other fiscal quarters. We have
a
$40 million line of credit with three banks, $2.7 million of which was utilized
as a standby letter of credit at September 2, 2006. Our long-term debt at
September 2, 2006, including current maturities, amounted to $102.3 million,
as
compared to $103.9 million at June 3, 2006.
For
the
thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006, $2.1 million in net cash was provided
by
operating activities. This compares to net cash used of $8.2 million for the
thirteen weeks ended August 27, 2005. In the first 2007 fiscal quarter,
approximately $15.0 million was provided from the sale of short-term investments
and net $702,000 was used for notes receivable and investments. Approximately
$300,000 was provided from disposal of property, plant and equipment, $5.2
million was used for purchases of property, plant and equipment and $6.1 million
was used for additional acquisition of the Hillandale business. Approximately
$292,000 was used for payments of dividends on common stock and $1.7 million
was
used for principal payments on long-term debt. The net result of these
activities was an increase in cash of approximately $3.4 million since June
3,
2006.
Substantially all trade receivables and inventories collateralize our revolving
line of credit and property, plant and equipment collateralize our long-term
debt under our loan agreements with our lenders. Unless otherwise approved
by
our lenders, we are required by provisions of these loan agreements to (1)
maintain minimum levels of working capital (ratio of not less than 1.25 to
1)
and net worth (minimum of $90.0 million tangible net worth); (2) limit dividends
to an aggregate amount not to exceed $500,000 per quarter (allowed if no
default), capital expenditures (not to exceed depreciation for the same four
fiscal quarters), lease obligations and additional long-term borrowings (total
funded debt to total capitalization not to exceed 55%); and (3) maintain various
cash-flow coverage ratios (1.25 to 1), among other restrictions. At September
2,
2006, we were in compliance with the provisions of all loan agreements. Under
certain of the loan agreements, the lenders have the option to require the
prepayment of any outstanding borrowings in the event we undergo a change in
control.
12
Under the terms of our Agreement with Hillandale and the Hillandale
shareholders, a new Florida limited liability company named Hillandale, LLC
was
formed. In fiscal 2006, we purchased 51% of the Units of Membership in
Hillandale, LLC, with the remaining Units to be acquired in essentially equal
annual installments over a four-year period. The purchase price of the Units
equal to their book value as calculated in accordance with the terms of the
Agreement. In fiscal 2007, we purchased, pursuant to the Agreement, an
additional 13% of the Units of Membership for $6.1 million from our cash
balances. We have recorded the obligation to acquire the remaining 36% at its
present value of $14.7 million. The actual remaining purchase price may be
higher or lower when the acquisitions are completed. Future funding is expected
to be provided by our cash balances and borrowings.
We
currently have a $1.9 million deferred tax liability due to a subsidiary's
change from a cash basis to an accrual basis taxpayer on May 29, 1988. The
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 provides that this liability is payable ratably
over
the 20 years beginning in fiscal 1999. However, such taxes will be due in their
entirety in the first fiscal year in which there is a change in ownership
control so that we no longer qualify as a "family farming corporation." We
are
currently making annual payments of approximately $150,000 related to this
liability. However, while these current payments reduce cash balances, payment
of the $1.9 million deferred tax liability would not impact our consolidated
statement of operations or stockholders' equity, as these taxes have been
accrued and are reflected on our consolidated balance sheet.
Impact
of Recently Issued Accounting Standards. Please
refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report Form 10-K for the year ended
June 3, 2006 for a discussion of the impact of recently issued accounting
standards. There were no accounting standards issued during
the quarter ended September 2, 2006 that we expect will have a material impact
on our consolidated financial statements.
In
November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 151, “Inventory
Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” SFAS No. 151
amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, to clarify that
abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight handling costs and wasted
materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges. In
addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production
overhead to inventory be based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We adopted
SFAS No. 151 in the first quarter of fiscal
2007
and
it did
not
have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial position
or
cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS Statement No. 123 (revised
2004), "Share-Based Payment," which is a revision of SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB
Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", and amends SFAS
No. 95, "Statement of Cash Flows". SFAS No. 123(R) requires all
share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options,
restricted stock and performance-based shares to be recognized in the income
statement based on their fair values. SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the
benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be
reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as
required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating
cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption.
In
the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the
modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation
cost will be recognized for all share-based payments granted after the adoption
of SFAS No. 123(R) and for all awards granted to employees prior to the
adoption date of SFAS No. 123R that remain unvested on the adoption date.
Accordingly, no restatements were made to prior periods. We recognized stock
based compensation expense of $160 for the thirteen week period ended September
2, 2006.
13
Prior
to
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we applied APB No. 25 in accounting for our
employee stock compensation plans and generally recognized no compensation
expense for employee stock options. Under the provisions of APB No. 25, we
recognized a liability for Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARS”) and Tandem Stock
Appreciation Rights (“TSARS”) based upon the intrinsic value of vested SARS and
TSARS at each period end. Under SFAS No. 123(R), we are required to recognize
a
liability for vested SARS and TSARS based upon their fair value at each period
end using a Black-Scholes option pricing model and to record a cumulative effect
adjustment for the change in method of accounting for such liability awards.
The
cumulative effect resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) was
insignificant and is included in stock based compensation expense for the
thirteen week period ended September 2, 2006.
Critical
Accounting Policies.
We
suggest that our Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, as described in
Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Cal-Maine
Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries annual report on Form10-K for the fiscal year
ended
June 3, 2006, be read in conjunction with this Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There have been
no
changes to critical accounting policies identified in our Annual Report on
Form
10-K for the year ended June 3, 2006.
ITEM
3.
QUANTATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES OF MARKET RISK
There
have been no material changes in the market risk reported in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2006.
ITEM
4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable
assurance that information we are required to be disclosed in our periodic
reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Commission’s rules and forms. Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls
and procedures conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, together with other financial officers, such officers concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period
covered by this report. There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified
in
connection with the evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter
that
has significantly affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our
internal controls over financial reporting.
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Except
as
noted below, there have been no new matters or changes to matters identified
in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 3, 2006.
Chicken
Litter Litigation
Cal-Maine
Farms, Inc.(“Cal-Maine Farms”), one of our subsidiaries, is presently a
defendant in two personal injury cases in the Circuit Court of Washington
County, Arkansas. Those cases are styled, McWhorter vs. Alpharma, Inc.,
et
al.
(“McWhorter”), and Carroll, et
al.
vs.
Alpharma, Inc., et
al.
(“Carroll”). Cal-Maine Farms was named as a defendant in the McWhorter case on
February 3, 2004, and as a defendant in the Carroll case on May 2, 2005.
Co-defendants in both cases include other integrated poultry companies such
as
Tyson Foods, Inc., Cargill, Incorporated, George’s Farms, Inc., Peterson Farms,
Inc., Simmons Foods, Inc., and Simmons Poultry Farms, Inc. Alpharma, Inc. and
Alpharma Animal Health, Co., manufacturers of an additive for broiler feed
also
are included as defendants.
14
Both
cases allege that the plaintiffs have suffered medical problems resulting from
living near land upon which “litter” from the defendants’ flocks was spread as
fertilizer. The McWhorter case focuses on mold and fungi allegedly created
by
the application of litter. The Carroll case also alleges injury from mold and
fungi, but focuses primarily on the broiler feed ingredient as the cause of
the
alleged medical injuries.
Several
other separate, but related, cases were prosecuted in the same venue by the
same
attorneys. The same theories of liability were prosecuted in all of the cases.
No Cal-Maine company was named as a defendant in any of those other cases.
The
plaintiffs selected one of those cases, Green, et
al.
vs.
Alpharma, Inc., et
al.,
as a
bellwether case to go to trial first. All of the poultry defendants were granted
summary judgment in the Green case on August 2, 2006. The case against the
Alpharma defendants resulted in a defendants’ verdict on September 25, 2006. The
result in the Green case is not dispositive of the issues raised in McWhorter
and Carroll, but it clearly colors the plaintiffs’ prospects for success.
The
plaintiffs’ attorneys have not yet indicated their intentions regarding the
remaining cases. It is possible that the McWhorter and Carroll plaintiffs can
present fundamentally different proof than was presented in the Green case,
but
that does not appear likely at present. The potential exposure, if any, in
the
McWhorter and Carroll cases appears to be diminished as a result of the outcome
in the Green case, but at this point it is still not possible to evaluate any
potential exposure with certainty.
State
of Oklahoma Watershed Pollution Litigation
On
June
18, 2005, the State of Oklahoma filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Oklahoma against a number of companies including us and
Cal-Maine Farms. An Answer on behalf of us and Cal-Maine Farms was filed on
October 3, 2005. The State of Oklahoma claims that through the disposal of
chicken litter the defendants have polluted the Illinois River Watershed. This
watershed provides water to eastern Oklahoma. The Complaint seeks injunctive
relief and monetary damages. We no longer have any operations in the Illinois
River Watershed. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that we will be materially
affected by any injunctive relief granted or monetary damages
awarded.
The
Court
has under advisement motions to dismiss filed by all defendants. Merit discovery
is underway. We presently are not able to provide an opinion regarding the
ultimate resolution of this action.
ITEM
1A. RISK
FACTORS
There
has
been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the
Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2006.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
We
did
not make any sales of unregistered securities during the first quarter of fiscal
2007.
For
information as to working capital utilization and other limitations upon the
payment of dividends see “Capital Resources” under Part 1, Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
this
Form 10-Q.
15
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
On
October 9, 2006, we issued a press release announcing our financial results
for
the quarter ended September 2, 2006. A copy of our press release is attached
as
Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
a. |
Exhibits
|
No.
|
Description
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of The Chief Executive Officer
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of The Chief Financial Officer
|
|
32.0
|
Section
1350 Certification of The Chief Executive Officer and The Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
99.1
|
Press
Release issued by registrant on October 9,
2006.
|
16
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
||
|
|
|
Date: October 9, 2006 | /s/ Timothy A. Dawson | |
Timothy
A. Dawson
Vice
President/Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
Date: October 9, 2006 | /s/ Charles F. Collins | |
Charles
F. Collins
Vice
President/Controller
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
17