CAL-MAINE FOODS INC - Quarter Report: 2007 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(mark
one)
x
Quarterly
report
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For
the
quarterly period ended September 1, 2007
OR
o
Transition
report
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For
the
transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission
file number: 000-04892
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
64-0500378
|
|||
(State
or other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|||
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
3320
Woodrow Wilson Avenue, Jackson, Mississippi 39209
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip
Code)
(601)
948-6813
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required
to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
Accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-
Accelerated filer o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o No
x
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock
(exclusive of treasury shares), as of September 28, 2007.
Common Stock, $0.01 par value | 21,231,991 shares |
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value | 2,400,000 shares |
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Part I. | Financial Information |
Page
Number
|
|||
|
|||||
Item
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets - September
1, 2007 and June 2, 2007 |
3
|
||||
|
|
||||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations -
Thirteen
Weeks Ended September 1, 2007 and
September
2, 2006
|
4
|
||||
|
|
||||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow -
Thirteen
Weeks Ended September 1, 2007 and
September
2, 2006
|
5
|
||||
|
|||||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Item 2. |
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of
Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
9
|
|||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures of Market Risk
|
13
|
|||
|
|||||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
13
|
|||
Part II. | Other Information | ||||
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
14
|
|||
|
|||||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
15
|
|||
|
|||||
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
15
|
|||
|
|||||
Item 5. | Other Information |
15
|
|||
|
|||||
Item 6. | Exhibits |
15
|
|||
|
|||||
|
|||||
Signatures |
16
|
2
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share amounts)
September
1, 2007
|
June
2, 2007
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
(note
1)
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
23,117
|
$
|
15,032
|
|||
Investments
|
46,951
|
39,500
|
|||||
Trade
and other receivables
|
45,051
|
38,180
|
|||||
Inventories
|
66,310
|
62,208
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
1,596
|
1,390
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
183,025
|
156,310
|
|||||
Notes
receivable and investments
|
8,373
|
7,913
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
4,195
|
4,195
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
2,944
|
2,560
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
383,788
|
376,316
|
|||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(187,627
|
)
|
(182,726
|
)
|
|||
196,161
|
193,590
|
||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
394,698
|
$
|
364,568
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
62,127
|
$
|
45,051
|
|||
Current
maturities of purchase obligation
|
6,769
|
5,435
|
|||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
13,126
|
13,442
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
12,633
|
11,830
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
94,655
|
75,758
|
|||||
Long-term
debt, less current maturities
|
97,437
|
99,410
|
|||||
Non-controlling
interests in consolidated entities
|
1,194
|
1,894
|
|||||
Purchase
obligation, less current maturities
|
5,848
|
9,867
|
|||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
2,180
|
2,150
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
19,879
|
19,750
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
221,193
|
208,829
|
|||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock $0.01 par value per share:
|
|||||||
Authorized
shares - 60,000
Issued
35,130 shares and 21,215 shares outstanding at
September
1, 2007 and 21,193 shares at June 2, 2007
|
351 | 351 | |||||
Class
A common stock $0.01 par value per share, authorized, issued
and
outstanding
2,400 shares at September 1, 2007 and June 2, 2007
|
24
|
24
|
|||||
Paid-in
capital
|
29,179
|
29,043
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
165,262
|
147,667
|
|||||
Common
stock in treasury - 13,915 shares at September 1, 2007
and
13,937 shares at June 2, 2007
|
(21,311
|
)
|
(21,346
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
173,505
|
155,739
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
394,698
|
$
|
364,568
|
See
notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
13
Weeks Ended
|
||||||
|
September
1, 2007
|
September
2, 2006
|
|||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
178,598
|
$
|
115,308
|
|||
Cost
of sales
|
133,018
|
106,901
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
45,580
|
8,407
|
|||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
18,648
|
14,470
|
|||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
26,932
|
(6,063
|
)
|
||||
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(1,647
|
)
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|||
Other
|
1,938
|
(143
|
)
|
||||
|
291
|
(1,938
|
)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||||
Income
(Loss ) before income taxes
|
27,223
|
(8,001
|
)
|
||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
9,257
|
(2,570
|
)
|
||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
17,966
|
$
|
(5,431
|
)
|
||
Net
income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.76
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.76
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
||
Dividends
per common share
|
$
|
0.0125
|
$
|
0.0125
|
|||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|||||
Basic
|
23,599
|
23,503
|
|||||
Diluted
|
23,724
|
23,503
|
See
notes to
condensed consolidated
financial statements.
4
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
(unaudited)
|
13
Weeks Ended
|
||||||
|
September
1, 2007
|
September
2, 2006
|
|||||
Cash
provided by (used in) operations
|
$
|
29,687
|
$
|
2,138
|
|||
|
|
|
|||||
Investing
activities:
|
|
|
|||||
Net
(increase)/decrease in investments
|
(7,450
|
)
|
15,000
|
||||
Purchases
of property, plant and equipment
|
(4,530
|
)
|
(5,238
|
)
|
|||
Payments
received on notes receivable and from investments
|
91
|
328
|
|||||
Increase
in notes receivable and investments
|
(651
|
)
|
(1,030
|
)
|
|||
Net
proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
173
|
277
|
|||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(12,367
|
)
|
9,337
|
||||
|
|
|
|||||
Financing
activities:
|
|
|
|||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock from treasury
|
117
|
-
|
|||||
Payment
of purchase obligation
|
(6,769
|
)
|
(6,101
|
)
|
|||
Principal
payments on long-term debt
|
(2,289
|
)
|
(1,660
|
)
|
|||
Payments
of dividends
|
(294
|
)
|
(292
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(9,235
|
)
|
(8,053
|
)
|
|||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
8,085
|
3,422
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
15,032
|
13,295
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
23,117
|
$
|
16,717
|
See
notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
September
1, 2007
(unaudited)
1. Presentation
of Interim Information
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for
interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article
10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting
of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the thirteen weeks ended September
1,
2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the
year ending May 31, 2008.
The
balance sheet at June 2, 2007 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date but does not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements.
For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.'s annual report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2007.
Hillandale
Acquisition
On
July
28, 2005, we entered into an Agreement to Form a Limited Liability Company
with
Hillandale Farms, Inc. and Hillandale Farms of Florida, Inc. (together,
“Hillandale”), and the Hillandale shareholders (the “Agreement”). Under the
terms of the Agreement, we acquired 51% of the Units of Membership in
Hillandale, LLC for cash of approximately $27,000 on October 12, 2005,
with the
remaining 49% of the Units of Membership to be acquired in essentially
equal
annual installments over a four-year period. The purchase price of the
Units
equals their book value at the time of purchase as calculated under the
terms of
the Agreement.
In
August
2006, in accordance with the Agreement, we purchased, for $6,100, an additional
13% of the Units of Hillandale, LLC based on their book value as of July
29,
2006. In August 2007, we purchased, for $6,800, an additional 12% of the
Units
of Hillandale, LLC based on their book value as of July 28, 2007. Our ownership
of Hillandale, LLC currently is 76%. Our obligation to acquire the remaining
24%
of Hillandale, LLC is recorded at its present value of $12,600 as of September
1, 2007, of which $6,800 is included in current liabilities and $5,800
is
included in other non-current liabilities in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet. We will purchase an additional 12% of Hillandale
LLC
based on the book value of the Membership
Units as of August 2, 2008.
Stock
Based Compensation
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),
"Share-Based Payment," which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation." SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, "Accounting
for
Stock Issued to Employees", and amends SFAS No. 95, "Statement of Cash
Flows". SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, restricted stock and
performance-based shares to be recognized in the income statement based
on their
fair values. SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions
in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing
cash
flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current
literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase
net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. In the first quarter
of
fiscal 2007, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective
method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost will be
recognized for all share-based payments granted after the adoption of SFAS
No. 123(R) and for all awards granted to employees prior to the adoption
date of SFAS No. 123R that remain unvested on the adoption date.
Accordingly, no restatements were made to prior periods. We recognized
stock
based compensation expense of $1,826 and $160 for the thirteen week periods
ending September 1, 2007 and September 2, 2006 respectively.
6
Prior
to
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we applied APB No. 25 in accounting for our
employee stock compensation plans and generally recognized no compensation
expense for employee stock options. Under the provisions of APB No. 25,
we
recognized a liability for Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARS”) and Tandem Stock
Appreciation Rights (“TSARS”) based upon the intrinsic value of vested SARS and
TSARS at each period end. Under SFAS No. 123(R), we are required to recognize
a
liability for vested SARS and TSARS based upon their fair value at each
period
end using a Black-Scholes option pricing model and to record a cumulative
effect
adjustment for the change in method of accounting for such liability awards.
The
cumulative effect resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) was
insignificant and is included in stock based compensation expense for the
thirteen week period ended September 2, 2006.
Our
stock-based compensation plans are described in note 1 of the consolidated
financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended June 2, 2007. These plans have not been modified in the 2008 fiscal
year.
A
summary
of our equity award activity and related information for the thirteen weeks
ended September 1, 2007 is as follows:
Number
of Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price Per Share
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding,
June 2, 2007
|
383,600
|
$
|
5.45
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Exercised
|
22,800
|
5.13
|
|||||||||||
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Outstanding,
September 1, 2007
|
360,800
|
$
|
5.47
|
7.58
|
$
|
5,166
|
|||||||
Exercisable,
September 1, 2007
|
135,200
|
$
|
4.98
|
7.23
|
$
|
2,003
|
The
number and weighted average grant-date fair value of nonvested equity awards
was
as follows:
Number
of Shares
|
Weighted
Average Grant-Date Fair Value Per Share
|
||||||
Nonvested,
June 2, 2007
|
305,880
|
$
|
2.61
|
||||
Granted
during quarter
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Vested
during quarter
|
(85,080
|
)
|
2.48
|
||||
Forfeited
during quarter
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Nonvested,
September 1, 2007
|
220,800
|
$
|
2.65
|
7
A
summary
of our liability award activity and related information for the thirteen
weeks
ended September 1, 2007 is as follows:
Number
Of Rights
|
Weighted
Average Strike Price Per Right
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding,
June 2, 2007
|
492,450
|
$
|
5.95
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Exercised
|
42,700
|
5.98
|
|||||||||||
Forfeited
|
6,000
|
5.93
|
|||||||||||
Outstanding,
September 1, 2007
|
443,750
|
$
|
5.94
|
7.96
|
$
|
6,144
822
|
|||||||
Exercisable,
September 1, 2007
|
121,250
|
$
|
5.79
|
7.86
|
$
|
1,696
311
|
The
fair
value of liability awards was estimated as of September 1, 2007 using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following weighted-average
assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.25%; dividend yield of 1%; volatility
factor of the expected market price of our stock of 32.1%; and a
weighted-average expected life of the rights of four years.
2. Inventories
Inventories
consisted of the following:
September
1, 2007
|
June
2, 2007
|
||||||
Flocks
|
$
|
42,042
|
$
|
40,773
|
|||
Eggs
|
4,381
|
4,704
|
|||||
Feed
and supplies
|
19,887
|
16,731
|
|||||
$
|
66,310
|
$
|
62,208
|
3. Legal
Proceedings
We
are
defendants in certain legal actions. It is our opinion, based on advice of
legal
counsel, that the outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse
effect on our consolidated financial position or operations. Please refer
to
Part II, Item 1, of this report for a description of certain pending legal
proceedings.
4. Net
Loss per Common
Share
Basic
loss per share is based on the weighted average common shares outstanding.
Diluted loss per share includes any dilutive effects of options and warrants.
Options and warrants representing 473,400
shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for
the
thirteen week period ended September 2, 2006 because they would be anti-dilutive
since we had a net loss for the period.
8
5. Income
Taxes
We
adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), effective June 3, 2007.
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum
recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized
in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. We had no significant unrecognized tax
benefits at the date of adoption or at September 1, 2007. Accordingly, we
do not
have any interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions. However,
if
interest or penalties were to be incurred related to uncertain tax positions,
such amounts would be recognized in income tax expense. Tax periods for all
years after 2003 remain open to examination by the federal and state taxing
jurisdictions to which we are subject.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This
report contains numerous forward-looking statements relating to our shell
egg
business, including estimated production data, expected operating schedules,
expected capital costs and other operating data. Such forward-looking statements
are identified by the use of words such as "believes," "intends," "expects,"
"hopes," "may," "should," "plan," "projected," "contemplates," "anticipates"
or
similar words. Actual production, operating schedules, results of operations
and
other projections and estimates could differ materially from those projected
in
the forward-looking statements. The factors that could cause actual results
to
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements
include
(i) the risk factors set forth under Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2007, (ii) the risks and hazards inherent
in
the shell egg business (including disease, pests, and weather conditions),
(iii)
changes in the market prices of shell eggs and (iv) changes or obligations
that
could result from our future acquisition of new flocks or businesses. Readers
are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We
disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
OVERVIEW
Cal-Maine
Foods, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Company”) is primarily engaged in the
production, grading, packaging, marketing and distribution of fresh shell
eggs.
Our fiscal year end is the Saturday closest to May 31.
Our
operations are fully integrated. At our facilities we hatch chicks, grow
and
maintain flocks of pullets (young female chickens, usually under 20 weeks
of
age), layers (mature female chickens) and breeders (male or female birds
used to
produce fertile eggs to be hatched for egg production flocks), manufacture
feed,
and produce, process and distribute shell eggs. We are the largest producer
and
marketer of shell eggs in the United States. We market the majority of our
shell
eggs in 29 states, primarily in the southwestern, southeastern, mid-western
and
mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. We market our shell eggs through
our
extensive distribution network to a diverse group of customers, including
national and regional grocery store chains, club stores, foodservice
distributors and egg product manufacturers.
We
currently produce approximately 78% of the total number of shell eggs sold
by
us, with approximately 10% of such total shell egg production being through
the
use of contract producers. Contract producers operate under agreements with
us
for the use of their facilities in the production of shell eggs by layers
owned
by us. We own the shell eggs produced under these arrangements. Approximately
22% of the total number of shell eggs sold by us is purchased from outside
producers for resale, as needed.
Our
operating income or loss is significantly affected by wholesale shell egg
market
prices, which can fluctuate widely and are outside of our control. Retail
sales
of shell eggs are generally greatest during the fall and winter months and
lowest during the summer months. Prices for shell eggs fluctuate in response
to
seasonal factors and a natural increase in egg production during the spring
and
early summer.
Our
cost
of production is materially affected by feed costs, which average about 57%
of
our total shell egg production cost. Changes in feed costs result in changes
in
cost of goods sold. The cost of feed ingredients is affected by a number
of
supply and demand factors such as crop production and weather, and other
factors, such as the level of grain exports and levels of use for ethanol
and
biofuel, over which we have little or no control.
9
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items from
our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations expressed as a percentage
of net
sales.
Percentage
of Net Sales
|
|||||||
13
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||
September
1, 2007
|
September
2, 2006
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||
Cost
of sales
|
74.5
|
92.7
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
25.5
|
7.3
|
|||||
Selling,
general & administrative
|
10.4
|
12.5
|
|||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
15.1
|
(5.2
|
)
|
||||
Other
income (expense)
|
.1
|
(1.7
|
)
|
||||
Income
(loss) before taxes
|
15.2
|
(6.9
|
)
|
||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
5.2
|
(
2.2
|
)
|
||||
Net
income (loss)
|
10.0
|
%
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
NET
SALES
Approximately
92% of our net sales consist of shell egg sales and approximately 4% was
for
incidental feed sales to outside egg producers, with the 4% balance consisting
of sales of egg products. Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2008
were
$178.6 million, an increase of $63.3 million, or 54.9 %, as compared to net
sales of $115.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Total dozen
eggs
sold decreased and egg selling prices increased in the current fiscal 2008
quarter as compared to the same fiscal 2007 quarter. Dozens sold for the
2008
current quarter were 163.9 million dozen a decrease of 7.7 million dozen,
or
4.5%, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Our net average selling
price per dozen for the fiscal 2008 first quarter was $.983, compared to
$.633
for the first quarter of fiscal 2007, an increase of 55.3%. Our net average
selling price is the blended price for all sizes and grades of shell eggs,
including non-graded egg sales, breaking stock and undergrades. Strengthened
by
an egg export order in May and in August, consumer demand during the first
quarter of fiscal 2008, remained steady, while egg supply remained tight,
resulting in an increase in egg selling prices.
COST
OF
SALES
Cost
of
sales consists of costs directly related to production and processing of
shell
eggs, including feed costs, and purchases of shell eggs from outside egg
producers. Cost of sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 was $133.0
million, an increase of $26.1 million, or 24.4%, as compared to the cost
of
sales of $106.9 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2007. The increase
is
due to increases in feed costs and the cost of egg purchases from outside
egg
producers. Following the increase in egg selling prices, the cost of outside
purchases increased. Feed cost per dozen for the fiscal 2008 first quarter
was
$.285, compared to $.216 per dozen for the comparable fiscal 2007 first quarter,
an increase of 31.9% for the current 2008 quarter. The increase in egg selling
prices exceeded the increase in cost of sales and resulted in an increase
in
gross profit from 7.3% of net sales for the quarter ended September 2, 2006
to
25.5% of net sales for the current quarter ended September 1, 2007.
10
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling,
general and administrative expenses include costs of marketing, distribution,
accounting and corporate overhead. Selling, general and administrative
expense
for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 was $18.6 million, an increase of
$4.1
million as compared to the expense of $14.5 million for the first quarter
of
fiscal 2007. The increase is due to increases in payroll expenses, stock
compensation expense and franchise fees on specialty egg sales. Net delivery
costs decreased due to a reduction in the number of Company long haul trucks,
increased back haul loads, offset by increased use of contract trucking.
As a
percent of net sales, selling, general and administrative expense decreased
from
12.5% for fiscal 2007 first quarter to 10.4% for fiscal 2008 first
quarter.
OPERATING
INCOME (LOSS)
As
a
result of the above, operating income was $26.9 million for the first quarter
of
fiscal 2008, as compared to an operating loss of $6.1 million for the fiscal
2007 first quarter. As a percent of net sales, the first fiscal 2008 quarter
had
an operating income of 15.1% of net sales, compared to an operating loss
of 5.2%
of net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE)
Other
income or expense consists of costs or income not directly charged to,
or
related to, operations such as interest expense and equity in income
(loss) of
affiliates. Other income for the first quarter ended September 1, 2007
was
$291,000, an increase of $2.2 million, as compared to other expense of
$1.9
million for the quarter ended September 2, 2006. For the first quarter
of fiscal
2008, net interest expense decreased $148,000 due to an increase of $280,000
in
interest income. For the first quarter of fiscal 2008 other income increased
$2.1 million, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2007. The
increase of other income is attributable to the increase in income /(loss)
absorbed by non-controlling interests in consolidated entities and increases
from equity in the income of nonconsolidated affiliates. Included
in net interest expense is non-cash interest expense, which decreased
by
$107,000. The non-cash interest expense is imputed on our non-interest
bearing
obligation to acquire the remaining membership units of Hillandale, LLC
over the
remaining acquisition period, culminating with us having a 100% interest
in
Hillandale, LLC. As a percent of net sales, other income (expense) increased
from (1.7%) for fiscal 2007 first quarter to .1% for fiscal 2008 first
quarter.
INCOME
TAXES
As
a
result of the above, we had pre-tax income of $27.2 million for the quarter
ended September 1, 2007, as compared to a pre-tax loss of $8.0 million for
the
quarter ended September 2, 2006. For the fiscal 2008 first quarter, an income
tax expense of $9.3 million was recorded with an effective tax rate of 34.0%,
as
compared to an income tax benefit of $2.6 million with an effective tax rate
of
32.1% for the fiscal 2007 first quarter.
NET
INCOME (LOSS)
As
a
result of the above, net income for the first quarter ended September 1,
2007
was $18.0 million, or $.76 per basic and diluted share, compared to a net
loss
of $5.4 million, or $.23 per basic share for the quarter ended September
2,
2006. As a percent of net sales, net income was 10.0% for the quarter ended
September 1, 2007, compared to a net loss of 4.7% for the quarter ended
September 2, 2006.
CAPITAL
RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Our
working capital at September 1, 2007 was $88.4 million compared to $80.6
million
at June 2, 2007. Our current ratio was 1.93 at September 1, 2007 as compared
with 2.06 at June 2, 2007. Our need for working capital generally is highest
in
the last and first fiscal quarters ending in May and August, respectively,
when
egg prices are normally at seasonal lows. Seasonal borrowing needs frequently
are higher during these quarters than during other fiscal quarters. We have
a
$40 million line of credit with three banks, $2.7 million of which was utilized
as a standby letter of credit at September 1, 2007. Our long-term debt at
September 1, 2007, including current maturities, amounted to $110.6 million,
as
compared to $112.9 million at June 2, 2007.
11
For
the
thirteen weeks ended September 1, 2007, $29.7 million in net cash was provided
by operating activities. This compares to net cash provided of $2.1 million
for
the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2006. In the first 2008 fiscal quarter,
approximately $7.5 million was used for the purchase of short-term investments
and net $560,000 was used for notes receivable and investments. Approximately
$173,000 was provided from disposal of property, plant and equipment, $4.5
million was used for purchases of property, plant and equipment and $6.8
million
was used for additional acquisition of the Hillandale business. Approximately
$294,000 was used for payments of dividends on common stock and $2.3 million
was
used for principal payments on long-term debt. Approximately $117,000 was
received from the issuance of common stock from the treasury. The net result
of
these activities was an increase in cash of approximately $8.1 million since
June 2, 2007.
Substantially
all trade receivables and inventories collateralize our revolving line of
credit
and property, plant and equipment collateralize our long-term debt under
our
loan agreements with our lenders. Unless otherwise approved by our lenders,
we
are required by provisions of these loan agreements to (1) maintain minimum
levels of working capital (ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1) and net worth
(minimum of $90.0 million tangible net worth adjusted for earnings); (2)
limit
dividends to an aggregate amount not to exceed $500,000 per quarter (allowed
if
no default), capital expenditures less exclusions (not to exceed 125% of
depreciation for the same four fiscal quarters), lease obligations and
additional long-term borrowings (total funded debt to total capitalization
not
to exceed 55%); and (3) maintain various cash-flow coverage ratios (1.25
to 1),
among other restrictions. At September 1, 2007, we were in compliance with
the
provisions of all loan agreements. Under certain of the loan agreements,
the
lenders have the option to require the prepayment of any outstanding borrowings
in the event we undergo a change in control.
Under
the
terms of our Agreement with Hillandale and the Hillandale shareholders, a
new
Florida limited liability company named Hillandale, LLC was formed. In fiscal
2006, we purchased 51% of the Units of Membership in Hillandale, LLC, with
the
remaining Units to be acquired in essentially equal annual installments over
a
four-year period. The purchase price of the Units is equal to their book
value
as calculated in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. In fiscal 2007,
we
purchased, pursuant to the Agreement, an additional 13% of the Units of
Membership for $6.1 million from our cash balances. In fiscal 2008, we
purchased, an additional 12% of the Units of Membership for $6.8 from our
cash
balances. We have recorded the obligation to acquire the remaining 24% at
its
present value of $12.6 million. The actual remaining purchase price may be
higher or lower when the acquisitions are completed. Future funding is expected
to be provided by our cash balances and borrowings.
Capital
expenditure requirements are expected to be for the normal repair and
replacement of our facilities. In addition, we have plans to construct a
new
integrated layer production complex in West Texas to replace our Albuquerque,
New Mexico complex, which has ceased egg production. The expected cost is
approximately $30.0 million.
We
currently have a $1.8 million deferred tax liability due to a subsidiary's
change from a cash basis to an accrual basis taxpayer on May 29, 1988. The
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 provides that this liability is payable ratably
over
the 20 years beginning in fiscal 1999. However, such taxes will be due in
their
entirety in the first fiscal year in which there is a change in ownership
control so that we no longer qualify as a "family farming corporation." We
are
currently making annual payments of approximately $150,000 related to this
liability. However, while these current payments reduce cash balances, payment
of the $1.8 million deferred tax liability would not impact our consolidated
statement of operations or stockholders' equity, as these taxes have been
accrued and are reflected on our consolidated balance sheet.
Looking
forward, we believe that our current cash balances, borrowing capacity,
utilization of our revolving line of credit, and cash flows from operations
are
sufficient to fund our current and projected capital needs.
12
Impact
of Recently Issued Accounting Standards. Please
refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report Form 10-K for the year ended
June 2, 2007 for a discussion of the impact of recently issued accounting
standards. There were no accounting standards issued during
the quarter ended September 1, 2007 that we expect will have a material impact
on our consolidated financial statements.
We
adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), effective June 3, 2007.
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum
recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized
in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. We had no significant unrecognized tax
benefits at the date of adoption or at September 1, 2007. Accordingly, we
do not
have any interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions. However,
if
interest or penalties were to be incurred related to uncertain tax positions,
such amounts would be recognized in income tax expense. Tax periods for all
years after 2003 remain open to examination by the federal and state taxing
jurisdictions to which we are subject.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No.157, "Fair Value Measurements"
(“FAS 157”). FAS 157 establishes a single authoritative definition of fair
value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and expands on required
disclosures about fair value measurement. FAS 157 is effective for us on
June 1,
2008 and will be applied prospectively. The provisions of FAS 157 are not
expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "Establishing the Fair Value
Option
for Financial Assets and Liabilities", to permit all entities to choose to
elect
to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value. SFAS No. 159 applies
to
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted
for an entity that has also elected to apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157.
An
entity is prohibited from retrospectively applying SFAS No. 159, unless it
chooses early adoption. Management is currently evaluating the impact of
SFAS
No. 159 on its consolidated financial statements.
Critical
Accounting Policies.
We
suggest that our Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, as described
in
Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Cal-Maine
Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries annual report on Form10-K for the fiscal year
ended
June 2, 2007, be read in conjunction with this Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There have been
no
changes to critical accounting policies identified in our Annual Report on
Form
10-K for the year ended June 2, 2007.
ITEM
3.
QUANTATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES OF MARKET RISK
There
have been no material changes in the market risk reported in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2007.
ITEM
4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance
that information we are required to be disclosed in our periodic reports
filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and
forms. Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures
conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, together
with other financial officers, such officers concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered
by
this report. There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified
in
connection with the evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter
that
has significantly affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our
internal controls over financial reporting.
13
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Except
as
noted below, there have been no new matters or changes to matters identified
in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 2, 2007.
Chicken
Litter Litigation
Cal-Maine
Farms, Inc., one of our subsidiaries, is presently a defendant in two personal
injury cases in the Circuit Court of Washington County, Arkansas. Those cases
are styled, McWhorter vs. Alpharma, Inc., et al., and Carroll, et al. vs.
Alpharma, Inc., et al. Cal-Maine Farms, Inc. was named as a defendant in
the
McWhorter case on February 3, 2004. It was named as a defendant in the Carroll
case on May 2, 2005. Co-defendants in both cases include other integrated
poultry companies such as Tyson Foods, Inc., Cargill, Incorporated, George’s
Farms, Inc., Peterson Farms, Inc., Simmons Foods, Inc., and Simmons Poultry
Farms, Inc. Alpharma, Inc. and Alpharma Animal Health, Co., manufacturers
of an
additive for broiler feed, are also included as defendants.
Both
cases allege that the plaintiffs have suffered medical problems resulting
from
living near land upon which “litter” from the defendants’ flocks was spread as
fertilizer. The McWhorter case focuses on mold and fungi allegedly created
by
the application of litter. The Carroll case also alleges injury from mold
and
fungi, but focuses primarily on the broiler feed ingredient as the cause
of the
alleged medical injuries.
Several
other separate, but related, cases were prosecuted in the same venue by the
same
attorneys. The same theories of liability were prosecuted in all of the cases.
No Cal-Maine company was named as a defendant in any of those other cases.
The
plaintiffs selected one of those cases, Green, et al. vs. Alpharma, Inc.,
et
al., as a bellwether case to go to trial first. All of the poultry defendants
were granted summary judgment in the Green case on August 2, 2006. The case
against the Alpharma defendants resulted in a defendants’ verdict on September
25, 2006. The result in the Green case is not dispositive of the issues raised
in McWhorter and Carroll, but it clearly colors the plaintiffs’ prospects for
success.
The
plaintiffs’ attorneys have not yet indicated their intentions regarding the
remaining cases. It is possible that the McWhorter and Carroll plaintiffs
can
present fundamentally different proof than was presented in the Green case,
but
that does not seem likely at present. The potential exposure, if any, in
the
McWhorter and Carroll cases appears to be diminished as a result of the outcome
in the Green case, but at this point it is still not possible to evaluate
any
potential exposure with certainty.
State
of Oklahoma Watershed Pollution Litigation
On
June
18, 2005, the State of Oklahoma filed suit in the U.S. District Court for
the
Northern District of Oklahoma against a number of companies including Cal-Maine
Foods, Inc. and Cal-Maine Farms, Inc. An Answer on behalf of both companies
was
filed on October 3, 2005. The State of Oklahoma claims that through the disposal
of chicken litter the defendants have polluted the Illinois River Watershed.
This watershed provides water to eastern Oklahoma. The Complaint seeks
injunctive relief and monetary damages. We no longer have any direct operations
in the Watershed. We do have an ownership interest in a limited liability
company that has operations in the Watershed. We do not anticipate that we
will
be materially affected by any request for injunctive relief.
Merit
discovery is ongoing. Cal-Maine and the other defendants filed a number of
dispositive motions, but the motions were either denied or carried with the
case
pending further discovery. Those dispositive motions which were determined
by
the Court to be premature will be renewed at the conclusion of discovery.
We are
not able at present to provide an opinion regarding the ultimate resolution
of
this action.
14
ITEM
1A. RISK
FACTORS
There
have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in
the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 2,
2007.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
We
made
no sales of unregistered securities during the first quarter of fiscal
2008.
For
information as to working capital utilization and limitations upon the payment
of dividends see “Capital Resources” under Part 1, Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
of this
Form 10-Q.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
On
October 1, 2007, we issued a press release announcing our financial results
for
the quarter ended September 1, 2007.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
a.
|
Exhibits
|
|
No.
|
Description
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of The Chief Executive Officer
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of The Chief Financial Officer
|
|
32.0
|
S
ection 1350 Certification of The Chief Executive Officer and
The Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
99.1
|
Press
release dated October 1, 2007 announcing interim period financial
information
(Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our Form 8-K dated October 1,
2007.)
|
15
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
CAL-MAINE
FOODS,
INC.
(Registrant)
Date:
October 3, 2007
_____/s/
Timothy A. Dawson__________________________
Timothy
A. Dawson
Vice
President/Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
Date:
October 3, 2007
____/s/
Charles F. Collins_________________________
Charles
F. Collins
Vice
President/Controller
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
16