CAL-MAINE FOODS INC - Quarter Report: 2008 August (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(mark
one)
x Quarterly
report pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended August 30, 2008
OR
o Transition
report
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For
the
transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission
file number: 000-04892
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
64-0500378
|
(State
or other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
3320
Woodrow Wilson Avenue, Jackson, Mississippi 39209
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip
Code)
(601)
948-6813
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes x No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
Accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No
x
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock
(exclusive of treasury shares), as of September 26, 2008.
Common
Stock, $0.01 par value
|
21,389,091
shares
|
||
Class
A Common Stock, $0.01 par value
|
2,400,000
shares
|
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Page
|
|||
Number
|
|||
Part
I.
|
Financial
Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets -
|
|||
August
30, 2008 and May 31, 2008
|
3
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income -
|
|||
Thirteen
Weeks Ended August 30, 2008 and
|
|||
September
1, 2007
|
4
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -
|
|||
Thirteen
Weeks Ended August 30, 2008 and
|
|||
September
1, 2007
|
5
|
||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of
|
||
Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
10
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
15
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
15
|
|
Part
II.
|
Other
Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
16
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
17
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
17 | |
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
17
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
17
|
|
Signatures |
18
|
2
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
August
30, 2008
|
May
31, 2008
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
75,416
|
$
|
94,858
|
|||
Investment
securities available-for-sale (Note
6)
|
1,015
|
-
|
|||||
Trade
and other receivables
|
54,081
|
47,930
|
|||||
Inventories
|
87,385
|
76,766
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
4,334
|
4,711
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
222,231
|
224,265
|
|||||
Investment
securities available-for-sale (Note
6)
|
36,137
|
40,754
|
|||||
Other
investments (Note
7)
|
16,366
|
13,421
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
21,528
|
13,452
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
4,538
|
2,851
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
428,321
|
410,326
|
|||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(210,180
|
)
|
(203,833
|
)
|
|||
218,141
|
206,493
|
||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
518,941
|
$
|
501,236
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
58,964
|
$
|
55,766
|
|||
Accrued
dividends payable
|
3,781
|
12,186
|
|||||
Current
maturities of purchase obligation
|
10,988
|
10,358
|
|||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
12,928
|
11,470
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
16,645
|
12,935
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
103,306
|
102,715
|
|||||
Long-term
debt, less current maturities
|
101,972
|
85,680
|
|||||
Non-controlling
interests in consolidated entities
|
2,070
|
1,687
|
|||||
Purchase
obligation, less current maturities
|
-
|
9,598
|
|||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
4,192
|
4,120
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
22,031
|
21,756
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
233,571
|
225,556
|
|||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock $0.01 par value per share:
|
|||||||
Authorized
shares - 60,000
|
|||||||
Issued
35,130 shares and 21,389 shares outstanding at
|
|||||||
August
30, 2008 and 21,317 shares outstanding at May 31, 2008
|
351
|
351
|
|||||
Class
A common stock $0.01 par value per share, authorized, issued
and
|
|||||||
outstanding
2,400 shares at August 30, 2008 and May 31, 2008
|
24
|
24
|
|||||
Paid-in
capital
|
31,973
|
29,697
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
274,991
|
267,616
|
|||||
Common
stock in treasury - 13,741 shares at August 30, 2008
|
|||||||
and
13,813 shares at May 31, 2008
|
(21,045
|
)
|
(21,156
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(924
|
)
|
(852
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
285,370
|
275,680
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
518,941
|
$
|
501,236
|
See
notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
13
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||
|
August
30, 2008
|
September
1, 2007
|
|||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
206,888
|
$
|
178,598
|
|||
Cost
of sales
|
166,241
|
133,018
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
40,647
|
45,580
|
|||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
22,666
|
18,648
|
|||||
Operating
income
|
17,981
|
26,932
|
|||||
Other
income (expense):
|
|||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(1,217
|
)
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|||
Other
|
625
|
1,938
|
|||||
|
(592
|
)
|
291
|
||||
|
|||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
17,389
|
27,223
|
|||||
Income
tax expense
|
6,242
|
9,257
|
|||||
Net
income
|
$
|
11,147
|
$
|
17,966
|
|||
Net
income per common share:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.47
|
$
|
0.76
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.47
|
$
|
0.76
|
|||
Dividends
per common share
|
$
|
0.1570
|
$
|
0.0125
|
|||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
23,730
|
23,599
|
|||||
Diluted
|
23,769
|
23,724
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated
financial statements.
4
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
(unaudited)
13
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||
August
30, 2008
|
September
1, 2007
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
11,147
|
$
|
17,967
|
|||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
6,494
|
5,717
|
|||||
Other
adjustments, net
|
3,290
|
6,003
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operations
|
20,931
|
29,687
|
|||||
Investing
activities:
|
|||||||
Purchase
of investments
|
(1,015
|
)
|
(13,050
|
)
|
|||
Sales
of investments
|
4,500
|
5,600
|
|||||
Acquisition
of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
(29,757
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Purchases
of property, plant and equipment
|
(5,920
|
)
|
(4,530
|
)
|
|||
Payments
received on notes receivable and from investments
|
183
|
91
|
|||||
Increase
in notes receivable and investments
|
(2,922
|
)
|
(651
|
)
|
|||
Net
proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
152
|
173
|
|||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(34,779
|
)
|
(12,367
|
)
|
|||
Financing
activities:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock from treasury
|
427
|
117
|
|||||
Payment
of purchase obligation
|
(11,585
|
)
|
(6,769
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from long-term borrowings
|
20,000
|
-
|
|||||
Principal
payments on long-term debt
|
(2,250
|
)
|
(2,289
|
)
|
|||
Payments
of dividends
|
(12,186
|
)
|
(294
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(5,594
|
)
|
(9,235
|
)
|
|||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(19,442
|
)
|
8,085
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
94,858
|
15,032
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
75,416
|
$
|
23,117
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
August
30, 2008
(unaudited)
1. |
Presentation
of Interim Information
|
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting
of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the thirteen weeks ended August 30,
2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the
year ending May 30, 2009.
The
balance sheet at May 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date but does not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements.
For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.'s annual report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008.
Zephyr
Egg, LLC Acquisition
On
June
27, 2008, we completed the acquisition of most of the assets of Zephyr Egg
Company, Zephyr Feed Company, Inc. and Scarlett Farms (together, “Sellers”),
located in Zephyrhills, FL and transferred those assets to a new Limited
Liability Company, Hillandale Foods, LLC, formed on that date. Pursuant to
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Organization for Hillandale Foods,
LLC,
we changed the name of the Limited Liability Company to Zephyr Egg, LLC. The
approximate cost for the acquisition of these assets was reported in note 2
of
our May 31, 2008 audited financial statements as $27,427. The final purchase
price was adjusted because the approximation at May 31, 2008 was based on
preliminary data, which was subsequently adjusted to coincide with the final
valuation of the assets acquired. The actual cost for the acquisition of most
of
the assets of the Sellers was $29,757, but the allocation of this purchase
price
to the assets acquired is not complete. Payment was funded through our current
cash balances. The assets purchased included approximately two million laying
hens in modern, in-line facilities, pullet growing facilities, two egg
processing plants, a feed mill and a fleet of delivery trucks for both eggs
and
feed. As part of the acquisition, the Company also acquired the Egg-Land’s
BestTM
franchise for southern Florida, certain flocks of contract laying hens, and
the
Sellers 12.58% interest in American Egg Products, Inc., in which the Company
already had a majority interest. Zephyr Egg, LLC’s results of operations have
been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of
acquisition.
The
following table presents the preliminary allocation of the acquisition cost
to
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their fair
values:
Accounts
receivable
|
$
|
2,788
|
||
Inventories
|
5,886
|
|||
Other
investments
|
1,532
|
|||
Property,
plant, and equipment
|
12,375
|
|||
Goodwill
& Intangible assets
|
7,176
|
|||
Total
assets acquired
|
29,757
|
|||
Total
liabilities assumed
|
-
|
|||
Net
assets acquired
|
$
|
29,757
|
6
The
allocation of the purchase price is based on preliminary data and could change
when final valuation of certain assets is obtained.
Pro-forma
information, which is usually presented for informational purposes only and
is
not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that actually would
have
been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of an earlier time, was
not available for the current quarter. We are in the process of obtaining and
reviewing such information, in order to assess the materiality of this
information to make a determination for subsequent period
presentation.
Hillandale
Acquisition
On
July
28, 2005, we entered into an Agreement to Form a Limited Liability Company
with
Hillandale Farms, Inc. and Hillandale Farms of Florida, Inc. (together,
“Hillandale”), and the Hillandale shareholders (the “Agreement”). Under the
terms of the Agreement, we acquired 51% of the Units of Membership in
Hillandale, LLC for cash of approximately $27,006 on October 12, 2005, with
the
remaining 49% of the Units of Membership to be acquired in essentially equal
annual installments over a four-year period. The purchase price of the Units
equals their book value at the time of purchase as calculated under the terms
of
the Agreement.
In
August
2006, in accordance with the Agreement, we purchased, for $6,102, an additional
13% of the Units of Hillandale, LLC based on their book value as of July
29,
2006. In August 2007, we purchased, for $6,769, an additional 12% of the
Units
of Hillandale, LLC based on their book value as of July 28, 2007. In August
2008, we purchased, for $11,585, an additional 12% of the Units of Hillandale,
LLC based on their book value as of July 28, 2007. Our ownership of Hillandale,
LLC currently is 88%. Our obligation to acquire the remaining 12% of Hillandale,
LLC is recorded at its present value of $10,988 as of August 30, 2008, which
is
included in current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet.
During fiscal 2008, additional payments totaling $5,700 were paid on the
purchase obligation. We will purchase the remaining 12% of Hillandale LLC
based
on the book value of the Membership Units as of July 25, 2009. The Company
will
adjust the original Hillandale purchase price allocation based on the ultimate
amount paid for the acquisition in accordance with SFAS 141.
Stock
Based Compensation
Refer
to
Note 9 of our May 31, 2008 audited financial statements for further information
on our stock compensation plans. Total stock based compensation expense for
the
thirteen weeks ended August 30, 2008 and September 1, 2007 was $3,404 and
$2,367, respectively. Our liabilities associated with Stock Appreciation Rights
as of August 30, 2008 and September 1, 2007 was $8,133 and $4,456,
respectively.
During
the thirteen weeks ended August 30, 2008, options were exercised for 72 shares
of common stock. Proceeds from the exercise of these options amounted to $427.
The Company made no stock-based grants during the thirteen weeks ended August
30, 2008.
2. |
Inventories
|
Inventories
consisted of the following:
August
30, 2008
|
May
31, 2008
|
||||||
Flocks
|
$
|
57,397
|
$
|
49,176
|
|||
Eggs
|
6,294 | 5,095 | |||||
Feed
and supplies
|
23,694
|
22,495
|
|||||
$
|
87,385
|
$
|
76,766
|
3. |
Legal
Proceedings
|
We
are
defendants in certain legal actions. It is our opinion, based on advice of
legal
counsel, that the outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse
effect on our consolidated financial position or operations. Please refer to
Part II, Item 1, of this report for a description of certain pending legal
proceedings.
7
4. |
Net
Income per Common Share
|
Basic
net
income per share was calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per
share was calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number
of
common shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effects of options
and warrants.
5. |
Dividends
declared per common share
|
Dividends
declared per Common Share is the average dividend declared on all classes of
common stock, calculated by dividing the dividends declared for the period
by
the average number of common stock outstanding for the period. Our Class A
Common Stock is paid at a rate equal to 95% of the rate on our Common
Stock.
6. |
Investment
securities available-for-sale
|
Investment
securities available-for-sale consist of auction rate securities accounted
for
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115,
“Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.”
Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains
and losses excluded from earnings and reported in shareholders’ equity.
Our
auction rate securities are long-term debt obligations rated AAA at the date
of
purchase. The ratings on the auction rate securities take into account credit
support through insurance policies guaranteeing each of the bonds’ payment of
principal and accrued interest. In the past, the auction process allowed
investors to obtain immediate liquidity if so desired by selling the securities
at their face amounts. Liquidity for these securities has historically been
provided by an auction process that resets interest rates on these investments
on average every 7-35 days. However, as has been reported in the financial
press, the disruptions in the credit markets adversely affected the auction
market for these types of securities. The Company believes that the appropriate
presentation of these securities is long-term investments as reflected in our
condensed consolidated balance sheets at May 31, 2008 and August 30, 2008.
Net
unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities of $852 and $924,
net
of income taxes, are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of
May
31, 2008 and August 30, 2008.
We
did
liquidate one auction rate security at par value for $4,500 with accrued
interest after this security was called on July 10, 2008 by the original issuer.
Our auction rate securities are held in an account with UBS Financial Services,
Inc (“UBS”). On August 8, 2008, UBS agreed to a settlement in principle with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the New York Attorney General, the
Massachusetts Securities Division, the Texas State Securities Board and other
state regulatory agencies represented by the North American Securities
Administrators Association to restore liquidity to all remaining UBS clients
who
hold auction rate securities. Pursuant to their plan of redemption, our
timeframe for redemption is June 30, 2010 through June 30, 2012. During this
timeframe, we may choose to continue to hold the auction rate securities and
earn interest or dividends or sell them to UBS at par plus accrued interest
at
any time during this timeframe.
At
August
30, 2008, $1,015 is classified as current investment securities
available-for-sale. These securities include primarily pre-funded municipal
bonds and certificates of deposit with maturities of three to six months when
purchased. Due to the nature of the investments, the cost at August 30, 2008
approximates fair value; therefore, other comprehensive income (loss) has not
been recognized as a separate component of stockholders' equity in regards
to
the current investment securities available-for-sale.
7. |
Other
Investments
|
“Other
investments” includes investments in affiliates accounted for by the equity
method and other investments accounted for by the cost method. Included in
“Other investments” is our investment in Dallas Re-Insurance Company, Ltd.
During fiscal 2008 there was a change in the ownership structure reducing the
equity owners to three with each having a proportional share of the ownership
interest. The increase in equity interest to 33% caused us to exceed the equity
interest threshold as defined by GAAP, which required us to account for our
investment using the equity method of accounting instead of the previously
applied cost method, in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion,
or
“APB,” No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock.” Refer to Note 3 of our May 31, 2008 audited financial statements for
further information on our investment in affiliates.
8
8. |
Fair
value of financial instruments
|
Effective
June 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS
157”). FAS 157 establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets
out a framework for measuring fair value, and expands on required disclosures
about fair value measurement. In February 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” which provides a one-year
deferral of the effective date of FAS 157 for non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities except those that are recognized or disclosed in
the
financial statements at fair value at least annually.
The
adoption of FAS 157 for our financial assets and financial liabilities did
not
have a material impact on our financial statements. We
are
currently evaluating the effect that the implementation of this standard for
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities will have on our financial
statements upon full adoption in 2009. FAS 157 defines fair value as the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit
price). Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under FAS 157 must
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs. FAS 157 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the
following hierarchy:
|
•
|
|
Level
1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
•
|
|
Level
2 - Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities,
quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs other than
quoted
prices that are observable for the asset or liability.
|
|
•
|
|
Level
3 - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
|
Our
financial assets and financial liabilities consisted of cash and cash
equivalents, and current investment securities available-for-sale at
August 30, 2008 which we consider to be classified as Level 1 and our
long-term investment securities available-for-sale which we consider to be
classified as Level 2.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, "Establishing the Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities" (“FAS 159”), to permit all
entities to choose to elect to measure eligible financial instruments at fair
value. We adopted FAS 159 effective June 1, 2008. Upon
adoption, we did not elect the fair value option for any items within the scope
of FAS 159 and, therefore, the adoption of FAS 159 did not have an impact on
our
financial statements.
9
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This
report contains numerous forward-looking statements relating to our shell egg
business, including estimated production data, expected operating schedules,
expected capital costs and other operating data. Such forward-looking statements
are identified by the use of words such as "believes," "intends," "expects,"
"hopes," "may," "should," "plan," "projected," "contemplates," "anticipates"
or
similar words. Actual production, operating schedules, results of operations
and
other projections and estimates could differ materially from those projected
in
the forward-looking statements. The factors that could cause actual results
to
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements include
(i) the risk factors set forth under Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008, (ii) the risks and hazards inherent
in
the shell egg business (including disease, pests, and weather conditions),
(iii)
changes in the market prices of shell eggs and (iv) changes or obligations
that
could result from our future acquisition of new flocks or businesses. Readers
are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We
disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
OVERVIEW
Cal-Maine
Foods, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Company”) is primarily engaged in the
production, grading, packaging, marketing and distribution of fresh shell eggs.
Our fiscal year end is the Saturday closest to May 31.
Our
operations are fully integrated. At our facilities we hatch chicks, grow and
maintain flocks of pullets (young female chickens, usually under 20 weeks of
age), layers (mature female chickens) and breeders (male or female birds used
to
produce fertile eggs to be hatched for egg production flocks), manufacture
feed,
and produce, process and distribute shell eggs. We are the largest producer
and
marketer of shell eggs in the United States. We market the majority of our
shell
eggs in 29 states, primarily in the southwestern, southeastern, mid-western
and
mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. We market our shell eggs through
our
extensive distribution network to a diverse group of customers, including
national and regional grocery store chains, club stores, foodservice
distributors and egg product manufacturers.
We
currently produce approximately 78% of the total number of shell eggs sold
by
us, with approximately 5% of such total shell egg production being through
the
use of contract producers. Contract producers operate under agreements with
us
for the use of their facilities in the production of shell eggs by layers owned
by us. We own the shell eggs produced under these arrangements. Approximately
22% of the total number of shell eggs sold by us is purchased from outside
producers for resale, as needed.
Our
operating income or loss is significantly affected by wholesale shell egg market
prices, which can fluctuate widely and are outside of our control. Retail sales
of shell eggs are generally greatest during the fall and winter months and
lowest during the summer months. Prices for shell eggs fluctuate in response
to
seasonal factors and a natural increase in egg production during the spring
and
early summer.
Our
cost
of production is materially affected by feed costs, which currently average
about 67% of our total farm egg production cost. Changes in market prices for
corn and soybean meal, the primary ingredients of the feed we use, result in
changes in our cost of goods sold. The cost of feed ingredients is affected
by a
number of supply and demand factors such as crop production and weather, and
other factors, such as the level of grain exports and levels of use for
renewable fuels, over which we have little or no control. Market prices for
corn
remain higher in part because of increasing demand from ethanol producers.
Market prices for soybean meal remain higher as a result of competition for
acres from other grain producers.
10
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items from our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income expressed as a percentage of net
sales.
Percentage
of Net Sales
13
Weeks Ended
|
|||||||
August
30, 2008
|
September
1, 2007
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||
Cost
of sales
|
80.3
|
74.5
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
19.7
|
25.5
|
|||||
Selling,
general & administrative
|
11.0
|
10.4
|
|||||
Operating
income
|
8.7
|
15.1
|
|||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(0.3
|
)
|
0.1
|
||||
Income
before taxes
|
8.4
|
15.2
|
|||||
Income
tax expense
|
3.0
|
5.2
|
|||||
Net
income
|
5.4
|
%
|
10.0
|
%
|
NET
SALES
Approximately
94% of our net sales consist of shell egg sales and approximately 5% was for
sales of egg products, with the 1% balance consisting of sales of incidental
feed and feed ingredients sales to outside egg producers. Net sales for the
first quarter of fiscal 2009 were $206.9 million, an increase of $28.3 million,
or 15.8 %, as compared to net sales of $178.6 million for the first quarter
of
fiscal 2008. Total dozen eggs sold and egg selling prices increased in the
current fiscal 2009 quarter as compared to the same fiscal 2008 quarter. Dozens
sold for the 2009 current quarter were 170.7 million dozen, an increase of
6.8
million dozen, or 4.1%, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Our
net
average selling price per dozen for the fiscal 2009 first quarter was $1.135,
compared to $.983 for the first quarter of fiscal 2008, an increase of 15.5%.
Our net average selling price is the blended price for all sizes and grades
of
shell eggs, including non-graded egg sales, breaking stock and undergrades.
Our
shell
egg sales which represent approximately 94% of our net sales, include the sale
of specialty shell eggs. Specialty shell eggs include reduced cholesterol,
cage
free and organic eggs. In the 13 weeks ended August 30, 2008, specialty shell
eggs represented approximately 17.3% of our shell egg dollar sales, as compared
to 14.4% for the same 13 week period last year. For the 13 weeks ended August
30, 2008, specialty shell eggs represented 12.7% of the total dozen eggs sold,
as compared to 9.8% for the same 13 week period last year.
Our
egg
product sales represent approximately 5% of our net sales. For the 13 weeks
ended August 30, 2008, egg product sales were $10.2 million, an increase of
$2.5
million, or 32.5%, as compared to $7.7 million for the same 13 week period
last
year.
11
COST
OF
SALES
Cost
of
sales consists of costs directly related to production and processing of shell
eggs, including feed costs, and purchases of shell eggs from outside egg
producers. Cost of sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 was $166.2
million, an increase of $33.2 million, or 25.0%, as compared to the cost of
sales of $133.0 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The increase
is
due to increases in feed costs and the cost of egg purchases from outside egg
producers. Prices paid for outside egg purchases rose in line with the increase
in egg selling prices. Feed cost per dozen for the fiscal 2009 first quarter
was
$.458, compared to $.285 per dozen for the comparable fiscal 2008 first quarter,
an increase of 60.7%. The increase in egg selling prices did not keep pace
with
the increase in cost of sales and resulted in a decrease in gross profit from
25.5% of net sales for the quarter ended September 1, 2007 to 19.7% of net
sales
for the current quarter ended August 30, 2008.
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling,
general and administrative expenses include costs of marketing, distribution,
accounting and corporate overhead. Selling, general and administrative expense
for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 was $22.7 million, an increase of $4.1
million as compared to the expense of $18.6 million for the first quarter of
fiscal 2008. The increase is primarily attributable to increases in our payroll
expenses, stock compensation plans expenses, advertising expenses, professional
fees paid to outside consultants, fuel costs for egg delivery, costs paid for
outside trucking, and franchise fees paid, which are assessed on our specialty
egg sales. Payroll expense and stock compensation plans expense increased by
$1.7 million. The calculation of the stock based compensation plans expense
is
dependent on the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock, which
increased from $19.79 at September 1, 2007 to $39.49 at August 30, 2008. The
aggregate increase for advertising expense, professional fees paid to outside
consultants, and franchise fees was $1.3 million. Net delivery costs increased
due to increases in fuel costs, payroll expenses, and the increased cost of
outside trucking. Fuel costs and outside trucking costs increased by $796,000.
As a percent of net sales, selling, general and administrative expense increased
from 10.4% for fiscal 2008 first quarter to 11.0% for fiscal 2009 first
quarter.
OPERATING
INCOME
As
a
result of the above, operating income was $18.0 million for the first quarter
of
fiscal 2009, as compared to operating income of $26.9 million for the fiscal
2008 first quarter. As a percent of net sales, the first fiscal 2009 quarter
had
an operating income of 8.7% of net sales, compared to operating income of 15.1%
of net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE)
Other
income or expense consists of costs or income not directly charged to, or
related to, operations such as interest expense and equity in income (loss)
of
affiliates. Other expense for the first quarter ended August 30, 2008 was
$592,000, an increase of $883,000, as compared to other income of $291,000
for
the quarter ended September 1, 2007. For the first quarter of fiscal 2009,
net
interest expense decreased $430,000. For the first quarter of fiscal 2009 other
income decreased $1.1 million, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
The
decrease of other income is attributable to the increase in income / (loss)
absorbed by non-controlling interests in consolidated entities and decreases
from equity in the income of nonconsolidated affiliates. Included
in net interest expense is non-cash interest expense, which increased by
$22,000. The non-cash interest expense is imputed on our non-interest bearing
obligation to acquire the remaining membership units of Hillandale, LLC over
the
remaining acquisition period, culminating with us having a 100% interest in
Hillandale, LLC. For the 13 weeks ended August 30, 2008, we capitalized $153,000
of interest expense in connection with our ongoing construction activities.
As a
percent of net sales, other income decreased from .1% for the fiscal 2008 first
quarter to other expense of (.3%) for the fiscal 2009 first
quarter.
12
INCOME
TAXES
As
a
result of the above, we had pre-tax income of $17.4 million for the quarter
ended August 30, 2008, as compared to pre-tax income of $27.2 million for the
quarter ended September 1, 2007. For the fiscal 2009 first quarter, an income
tax expense of $6.2 million was recorded with an effective tax rate of 35.9%,
as
compared to income tax expense of $9.3 million with an effective tax rate of
34.0% for the fiscal 2008 first quarter.
NET
INCOME
As
a
result of the above, net income for the first quarter ended August 30, 2008
was
$11.1 million, or $.47 per basic and diluted share, as compared to net income
of
$18.0 million, or $.76 per basic and diluted share for the quarter ended
September 1, 2007. As a percent of net sales, net income was 5.4% for the
quarter ended August 30, 2008, compared to net income of 10.0% for the quarter
ended September 1, 2007.
CAPITAL
RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Our
working capital at August 30, 2008 was $118.9 million compared to $121.6 million
at May 31, 2008. Our current ratio was 2.15 at August 30, 2008 as compared
with
2.18 at May 31, 2008. Our need for working capital generally is highest in
the
last and first fiscal quarters ending in May and August, respectively, when
egg
prices are normally at seasonal lows. Seasonal borrowing needs frequently are
higher during these quarters than during other fiscal quarters. We have a $40
million line of credit with three banks, $2.7 million of which was utilized
as a
standby letter of credit at August 30, 2008. Our long-term debt at August 30,
2008, including current maturities, amounted to $114.9 million, as compared
to
$97.2 million at May 31, 2008.
For
the
thirteen weeks ended August 30, 2008, $20.9 million in net cash was provided
by
operating activities. This compares to net cash provided by operations of $29.7
million for the thirteen weeks ended September 1, 2007. In the first 2009 fiscal
quarter, approximately $1.0 million was used for the purchase of short-term
investments, $4.5 million was provided from the sale of short-term investments,
and net $2.7 million was used for notes receivable and investments.
Approximately $152,000 was provided from disposal of property, plant and
equipment, $5.9 million was used for purchases of property, plant and equipment
and $11.6 million was used for additional acquisition of the Hillandale
business. We used $29.8 million for the acquisition of most of the assets of
Zephyr Egg Company, Zephyr Feed Company, Inc, and Scarlett Farms to form Zephyr
Egg, LLC. Approximately $12.2 million was used for payment of dividends on
common stock and $2.3 million was used for principal payments on long-term
debt.
Approximately $427,000 was received from the issuance of common stock from
the
treasury, and approximately $20.0 million was received from additional long-term
borrowings. The net result of these activities was a decrease in cash of
approximately $19.4 million since May 31, 2008.
Substantially
all trade receivables and inventories collateralize our revolving line of credit
and most of our property, plant and equipment collateralize our long-term debt
under our loan agreements with our lenders. Unless otherwise approved by our
lenders, we are required by provisions of these loan agreements to (1) maintain
minimum levels of working capital (ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1) and net
worth (minimum of $90.0 million tangible net worth adjusted for earnings);
(2)
limit capital expenditures less exclusions (not to exceed $60.0 million for
any
period of four consecutive fiscal quarters), lease obligations and additional
long-term borrowings (total funded debt to total capitalization not to exceed
55%); and (3) maintain various cash-flow coverage ratios (1.25 to 1), among
other restrictions. At August 30, 2008, we were in compliance with the
provisions of all loan agreements. Under certain of the loan agreements, the
lenders have the option to require the prepayment of any outstanding borrowings
in the event we undergo a change in control.
Under
the
terms of our Agreement with Hillandale and the Hillandale shareholders, a new
Florida limited liability company named Hillandale, LLC was formed. In fiscal
2006, we purchased 51% of the Units of Membership in Hillandale, LLC for cash
of
approximately $27.0 million, with the remaining Units to be acquired in
essentially equal annual installments over a four-year period. The purchase
price of the Units is equal to their book value as calculated in accordance
with
the terms of the Agreement. In fiscal 2007, we purchased, pursuant to the
Agreement, an additional 13% of the Units of Membership for $6.1 million from
our cash balances. In fiscal 2008, we purchased an additional 12% of the Units
of Membership for $6.8 million from our cash balances. During
fiscal 2008, an additional payment of $5.7 million was paid on the purchase
obligation. In fiscal 2009, we purchased an additional 12% of the Units of
Membership for $11.6 million from our cash balances. We
have
recorded the obligation to acquire the remaining 12% at its estimated present
value of $11.0 million at August 30, 2008. The actual remaining purchase price
may be higher or lower when the acquisitions are completed. Future funding
is
expected to be provided by our cash balances and borrowings.
13
Capital
expenditure requirements are expected to be for the normal repair and
replacement of our facilities. In addition, we are constructing a new integrated
layer production complex in the city of Farwell in west Texas to replace our
Albuquerque, New Mexico complex, which has ceased egg production. The expected
cost is approximately $30.0 million. Completion of this facility is estimated
to
be in January 2010. As of August 30, 2008 capital expenditures related to
construction of this complex were $17.3 million. The remaining future capital
expenditures will be funded by cash flows from operations, existing lines of
credit and additional long-term borrowings.
Delta
Egg
Farm, LLC, an unconsolidated affiliate, is constructing an organic egg
production and distribution facility near our Chase, Kansas location. The cost
of construction is estimated to be approximately $13.0 million. In connection
with this project, we are a pro rata guarantor, with the other Delta Egg Farm,
LLC owners, of additional debt undertaken to fund construction of this facility.
We are currently a guarantor of approximately $7.4 million of long-term debt
of
Delta Egg Farm, LLC.
We
currently have a $1.6 million deferred tax liability due to a subsidiary's
change from a cash basis to an accrual basis taxpayer on May 29, 1988. The
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 provides that this liability is payable ratably
over
the 20 years beginning in fiscal 1999. However, such taxes will be due in their
entirety in the first fiscal year in which there is a change in ownership
control so that we no longer qualify as a family farming corporation. We are
currently making annual payments of approximately $150,000 related to this
liability. However, while these current payments reduce cash balances, payment
of the $1.6 million deferred tax liability would not impact our consolidated
statement of income or stockholders' equity, as these taxes have been accrued
and are reflected on our consolidated balance sheet.
Looking
forward, we believe that our current cash balances, borrowing capacity,
utilization of our revolving line of credit, and cash flows from operations
are
sufficient to fund our current and projected capital needs.
Impact
of Recently Issued Accounting Standards. Please
refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report Form 10-K for the year ended May
31, 2008 for a discussion of the impact of recently issued accounting standards.
There were no accounting standards issued during
the quarter ended August 30, 2008 that we expect will have a material impact
on
our consolidated financial statements.
Effective
June 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS
157”). FAS 157 establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets
out a framework for measuring fair value, and expands on required disclosures
about fair value measurement. In February 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” which provides a one-year
deferral of the effective date of FAS 157 for non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities except those that are recognized or disclosed in
the
financial statements at fair value at least annually.
The
adoption of FAS 157 for our financial assets and financial liabilities did
not
have a material impact on our financial statements. We
are
currently evaluating the effect that the implementation of this standard for
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities will have on our financial
statements upon full adoption in 2009. FAS 157 defines fair value as the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit
price). Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under FAS 157 must
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs. FAS 157 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the
following hierarchy:
|
•
|
|
Level
1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
•
|
|
Level
2 - Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities,
quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs other than
quoted
prices that are observable for the asset or liability.
|
14
|
•
|
|
Level
3 - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
|
Our
financial assets and financial liabilities consisted of cash and cash
equivalents, and current investment securities available-for-sale at
August 30, 2008 which we consider to be classified as Level 1 and our
long-term investment securities available-for-sale which we consider to be
classified as Level 2.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, "Establishing the Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities" (“FAS 159”), to permit all
entities to choose to elect to measure eligible financial instruments at fair
value. We adopted FAS 159 effective June 1, 2008. Upon
adoption, we did not elect the fair value option for any items within the scope
of FAS 159 and, therefore, the adoption of FAS 159 did not have an impact on
our
financial statements.
Critical
Accounting Policies.
We
suggest that our Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, as described in
Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Cal-Maine
Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries annual report on Form10-K for the fiscal year
ended
May 31, 2008, be read in conjunction with this Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There have been
no
changes to critical accounting policies identified in our Annual Report on
Form
10-K for the year ended May 31, 2008.
ITEM
3. QUANTATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES OF MARKET RISK
There
have been no material changes in the market risk reported in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance
that information we are required to disclose in our periodic reports filed
with
the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.
Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures conducted
by
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, together with other
financial officers, such officers concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this
report. There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified
in
connection with the evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter
that
has significantly affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our
internal controls over financial reporting, except the change discussed under
“Change
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting,”
below.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Subsequent
to the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we began implementing a new enterprise
resource planning (“ERP”) system. The implementation of the ERP system
represents a material change in our internal controls over financial reporting.
Management
is reviewing and evaluating the design of key controls in the new ERP system
and
the accuracy of the data conversion that is taking place during the
implementation and thus far has not uncovered a control deficiency or
combination of control deficiencies that management believes meet the definition
of a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. Although
management believes internal controls are being maintained or enhanced by the
new ERP system, it has not completed its testing of the operating effectiveness
of all key controls in the new system. As such, there is a risk such control
deficiencies may exist that have not yet been identified and that could
constitute, individually or in combination, a material weakness. Management
will
continue to evaluate the operating effectiveness of related key controls during
subsequent periods.
15
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Except
as
noted below, there have been no new matters or changes to matters identified
in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2008.
Cal-Maine
Farms, Inc., a subsidiary of ours, is a defendant in two personal injury cases
in the Circuit Court of Washington County, Arkansas. Those cases are styled,
McWhorter
vs. Alpharma, Inc., et
al.,
and
Carroll,
et
al.
vs.
Alpharma, Inc., et
al.
Cal-Maine Farms, Inc. was named as a defendant in the McWhorter
case on
February 3, 2004. It was named as a defendant in the Carroll
case on
May 2, 2005. Co-defendants in both cases include other integrated poultry
companies such as Tyson Foods, Inc., Cargill, Incorporated, George’s Farms,
Inc., Peterson Farms, Inc., Simmons Foods, Inc., and Simmons Poultry Farms,
Inc.
The manufacturers of an additive for broiler feed are also included as
defendants. Those defendants are Alpharma, Inc. and Alpharma Animal Health,
Co.
Both
cases allege that the plaintiffs have suffered medical problems resulting from
living near land upon which “litter” from the defendants’ flocks was spread as
fertilizer. The McWhorter
case
focuses on mold and fungi allegedly created by the application of litter. The
Carroll
case
also alleges injury from mold and fungi, but focuses primarily on the broiler
feed ingredient as the cause of the alleged medical injuries. No trial date
for
either the Carroll
or
McWhorter
case has
been set.
Several
other separate, but related, cases were prosecuted in the same venue by the
same
attorneys. The same theories of liability were prosecuted in all of the cases.
No company of ours was named as a defendant in any of those other cases. The
plaintiffs selected one of those cases, Green,
et
al.
vs.
Alpharma, Inc.,
et
al.,
as a
bellwether case to go to trial first. All of the poultry defendants were granted
summary judgment in the Green
case on
August 2, 2006. On May 8, 2008, however, the Arkansas Supreme Court reversed
the
summary judgment in favor of the poultry defendants and remanded the case for
trial. No new trial date in Green
has been
set.
State
of Oklahoma Watershed Pollution Litigation.
On
June
18, 2005, the State of Oklahoma filed suit, in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Oklahoma, against a number of companies, including
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Cal-Maine Farms, Inc. We and Cal-Maine Farms filed
our
joint answer and motion to dismiss the suit on October 3, 2005. The State of
Oklahoma claims that through the disposal of chicken litter the defendants
have
polluted the Illinois River Watershed. This watershed provides water to eastern
Oklahoma. The Complaint seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages. The
parties participated in a series of mediation meetings without success.
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. no longer operates in the watershed. Accordingly, we
do
not anticipate that Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. will be materially affected by the
request for injunctive relief. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. owns ninety percent of
a
new corporation, Benton County Foods, LLC, which is an ongoing commercial shell
egg operation within the Illinois River Watershed. Benton County Foods, LLC
is
not a defendant in the litigation.
Some
dispositive motions have been filed jointly by all defendants. Some of those
motions were rejected by the Court, and others were left unresolved after oral
arguments. Other dispositive motions will be filed. We are not able at present
to give an opinion regarding the ultimate resolution of the action.
In
February, 2008, a hearing was had on the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary
injunctive relief. The principal relief sought was a moratorium on litter
application in the watershed. The district court has not yet ruled on the
motion.
The
presiding judge has appointed a fellow district court judge to act as a
settlement judge. That judge has initiated settlement discussions. Three
settlement meetings have taken place, but thus far have not been
productive.
16
ITEM
1A.
RISK
FACTORS
There
have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31,
2008.
ITEM
2.
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
We
made
no sales of unregistered securities during the first quarter of fiscal
2009.
For
information as to working capital utilization see “Capital Resources” under Part
1, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
On
September 29, 2008, we issued a press release announcing our financial results
for the quarter ended August 30, 2008.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
a. |
Exhibits
|
No.
|
Description
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of The Chief Executive Officer
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of The Chief Financial Officer
|
|
32.0
|
Section
1350 Certification of The Chief Executive Officer and The Chief
Financial
Officer
|
|
99.1
|
Press
release dated September 29, 2008 announcing interim period financial
information
|
17
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
CAL-MAINE
FOODS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
||
|
|
|
Date: September 30, 2008 | By: | /s/ Timothy A. Dawson |
Timothy A. Dawson |
||
Vice
President/Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
Date: September 30, 2008 | By: | /s/ Charles F. Collins |
Charles F. Collins |
||
Vice
President/Controller
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
18