CALAVO GROWERS INC - Annual Report: 2005 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005
Commission file number: 000-33385
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California (State of incorporation) |
33-0945304 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
1141-A Cummings Road, Santa Paula, CA (Address of principal executive offices) |
93060 (Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (805) 525-1245
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value per Share
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value per Share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Based on the closing price as reported on the Nasdaq National Market, the aggregate market
value of the Registrants Common Stock held by non-affiliates on April 30, 2005 (the last business
day of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $114.6
million. Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer and director and by each
shareholder affiliated with a director or an executive officer have been excluded from this
calculation because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate
status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. The number of outstanding
shares of the Registrants Common Stock as of November 30, 2005 was 14,375,833.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
which we intend to hold on April 26, 2006, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form
10-K. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days after October 31, 2005.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements relating to future results of Calavo Growers,
Inc. (including certain projections and business trends) that are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the safe harbor created by those
sections. Forward-looking statements frequently are identifiable by the use of words such as
believe, anticipate, expect, intend, will, and other similar expressions. Our actual
results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties.
These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: increased competition, general
economic and business conditions, energy costs and availability, conducting substantial amounts of
business internationally, pricing pressures on agricultural products, adverse weather and growing
conditions confronting avocado growers, new governmental regulations, as well as other risks and
uncertainties, including those set forth in Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K and those detailed from time to time in our other filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and
we undertake no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise.
2
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Business
General development of the business
We engage in the procurement and marketing of avocados and other perishable foods and the
preparation and distribution of processed avocado products. Our expertise in marketing and
distributing avocados, processed avocados, and other perishable foods allows us to deliver a wide
array of fresh and processed food products to food distributors, produce wholesalers, supermarkets,
and restaurants on a worldwide basis. Through our three operating facilities in Southern
California and two facilities in Mexico, we sort pack and/or ripen avocados procured in California
and Mexico and prepare processed avocado products. Additionally, we procure avocados
internationally, principally from Chile and the Dominican Republic, and distribute other perishable
foods, such as Hawaiian grown papayas. We report these operations in three different business
segments: California avocados, international avocados and perishable food products, and processed
products.
On October 9, 2001, we completed a series of transactions whereby common and preferred
shareholders of Calavo Growers of California (the Cooperative), an agricultural marketing
cooperative association, exchanged all of their outstanding shares for shares of our common stock.
Concurrent with this transaction, the Cooperative was merged into us with Calavo Growers, Inc.
(Calavo) emerging as the surviving entity. These transactions had the effect of converting the
legal structure of the business from a non profit cooperative to a for-profit corporation. All
references herein to us for periods prior to the merger refer to the business and operations of the
Cooperative.
In February 2003, our Board of Directors approved a plan whereby the operations of our
processed products business would be relocated. The plan called for the closing of our Santa
Paula, California and Mexicali, Baja California Norte processing facilities and the relocation of
these operations to a new facility in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico. This restructuring has provided
for cost savings in the elimination of certain transportation costs, duplicative overhead
structures, and savings in the overall cost of labor and services. The Uruapan facility commenced
operations in February 2004 and the Santa Paula and Mexicali facilities were closed in February
2003 and August 2004. During fiscal 2005, we incurred costs related to this restructuring
approximating $0.4 million, which are recorded in our income statement as both cost of sales ($0.3
million) and selling, general and administrative expenses ($0.1 million). All the above amounts
have been paid and we do not expect any additional operating costs related to this restructuring.
In November 2003, we acquired all the outstanding common shares of Maui Fresh International,
Inc. (Maui). Maui distributes a multi-product line of specialty produce through retail, food
service and terminal market wholesale channels. Maui is currently based in Los Angeles,
California, but maintains significant operations in Hawaii and Nogales, Arizona. Maui packs and
distributes a diversified line comprised of more than 20 commodities, including tropical and exotic
fruits, chilies and hothouse-grown items, as well as other conventional fruits and vegetables.
In March 2005, we completed the sale of our old corporate headquarters building (located in
Santa Ana) for $3.4 million. This transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain on sale of approximately
$1.7 million. In conjunction with such sale, we relocated our corporate offices to Santa Paula,
California in March 2005. Total expenses related to such relocation approximated $0.4 million.
In June 2005, in order to increase our market share of California avocados and increase
synergies within the marketplace, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Limoneira Company
(Limoneira). Pursuant to such agreement, we acquired approximately 15.1% of Limoneiras
outstanding common stock for $23.45 million and Limoneira acquired approximately 6.9% of our
outstanding common stock for $10 million. The transaction was
settled by a net cash payment by us of $13.45 million. Additionally, such agreement also provided for: (1)
Calavo to lease office space from Limoneira in Santa Paula, California for a period of 10 years at
an initial annual gross rental of approximately $0.2 million (subject to annual CPI increases, as
defined), (2) Calavo to market Limoneiras avocados and (3) Calavo and Limoneira to use good faith
reasonable efforts to maximize avocado packing efficiencies for both parties by consolidating their
fruit packing operations. Various opportunities are currently being considered, including the use
of existing packing facilities, an investment in existing vacant facilities, and/or an investment
in a new consolidated facility for both parties.
Limoneira, which generated total revenues of approximately $26 million during fiscal 2004,
primarily engages in growing citrus and avocados, picking and hauling citrus, and packing lemons.
The issuances of the shares discussed above are exempt from registration under federal and state
securities laws.
Our principal executive offices are located at 1141-A Cummings Road, Santa Paula, California
93060; telephone (805) 525-1245.
At October 31, 2005, we employed approximately 700 employees worldwide.
3
Table of Contents
Available information
We maintain an Internet website at http://www.calavo.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports filed or
furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and other information related to us, are available, free of charge, on our website as soon
as reasonably practicable after we electronically file those documents with, or otherwise furnish
them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Internet website and the information
contained therein, or connected thereto, is not and is not intended to be incorporated into this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
California avocados
Calavo was founded in 1924 to market California avocados. In California, the growing area
stretches from San Diego County to San Luis Obispo County, with the majority of the growing areas
located approximately 100 miles north and south of Los Angeles County. The storage life of fresh
avocados is limited. It generally ranges from one to four weeks, depending upon the maturity of
the fruit, the growing methods used, and the handling conditions in the distribution chain.
The Hass variety is the predominant avocado variety marketed on a worldwide basis. California
grown Hass avocados are available year-round, with peak production periods occurring between
February through September. Other varieties have a more limited picking season and command a lower
price. Approximately 2,200 growers deliver avocados to us, generally pursuant to a standard
marketing agreement. Over the past several years, our share of the California avocado crop has
remained strong, with approximately 35% of the 2005 California avocado crop handled by us, based on
data published by the California Avocado Commission. We attribute our solid foothold in the
California industry principally to the competitiveness of the per pound returns we pay and the
communication we maintain with our growers.
Avocados delivered to our packinghouses are graded, sized, packed, and cooled for delivery to
customers. Our ability to estimate the size, as well as the timing of the delivery of the annual
avocado crop, has a substantial impact on both our costs and the sales price we receive for the
fruit. To that end, our field personnel maintain direct contact with growers and farm managers and
coordinate harvest plans. The feedback from our field-managers is used by our sales department to
prepare sales plans used by our direct sales force.
A significant portion of our costs are fixed. As a result, significant fluctuations in the
volume of avocados delivered have a considerable impact on the per pound packing costs of avocados
we handle. Generally, larger crops will result in a lower per pound handling cost. We believe
that our cost structure is geared to optimally handle larger avocado crops than we have handled in
recent years. Our strategy calls for continued efforts in aggressively recruiting new growers,
retaining existing growers, and procuring a larger percentage of the California avocado crop.
Avocados delivered to us are grouped as a homogenous pool on a weekly basis based on the
variety, size, and grade. The proceeds we receive from the sale of each separate avocado pool, net
of a packing and marketing fee to cover our costs and a profit, are paid back to the growers once
each month. The packing and marketing fee we withhold is periodically determined and revised based
on our estimated per pound packing and operating costs, as well as our operating profit.
Significant competitive pressures dictate that we set the packing and marketing fee at the lowest
possible level to attract new and retain existing grower business. We believe that, if net
proceeds paid ceased to be competitive, growers would choose to deliver their avocados to alternate
competitive handlers. Consequently, we strive to deliver growers the highest return possible on
avocados delivered to our packinghouses.
The California avocado market is highly competitive with 9 major avocado handlers. A
marketing order enacted by the state legislature is in effect for California grown avocados and
provides the financial resource to fund generic advertising and promotional programs. Although
avocados handled by us are identifiable through packaging and the Calavo brand name sticker, we
believe that consumers generally do not purchase avocados based on brand loyalty. We have,
however, developed a series of marketing and sales initiatives aimed at our largest customers that
are designed to differentiate our products and services from those offered by our competitors.
Some of these key initiatives are as follows:
| We continue to have success with our ProRipeVIP avocado ripening program. This proprietary program allows us to deliver avocados with varying degrees of ripeness to our customers. We have invested in the Aweta AFS (acoustic firmness sensor) technology and equipment. ProRipeVIP is the next generation of selling preconditioned avocados that have firmness determined via soundwaves. This technology is not new to the produce industry, but is new to avocados. The most significant and compelling reason we choose to invest in Aweta systems is because the acoustic sensors measure firmness of the entire piece of fruit, as opposed to competitive mechanical tests that use pressure and calculated averages to measure firmness. We |
4
Table of Contents
believe that ripened avocados help our customers address the consumers immediate needs and accelerate the sale of avocados through their stores. | |||
| We have developed various display techniques and packages that appeal to consumers and, in particular, impulse buyers. Some of our techniques include the bagging of avocados and the strategic display of the bags within the produce section of retail stores. Our research has demonstrated that consumers generally purchase a larger quantity of avocados when presented in a bag as opposed to the conventional bulk displays. We also believe that the value proposition of avocados in a bag provides for a higher level of sales to grocery stores. | ||
| From time to time, we market our avocados under joint promotion programs with other food manufacturers. Under these programs, we seek to increase the promotional exposure of our products by providing certain sales incentives. These incentives will be offered in conjunction with various promotional campaigns designed to advertise the products of all parties involved. We believe these programs will help us minimize our advertising costs, as they will be shared with other parties, while still achieving recognition in the marketplace. | ||
| We have established one of the industrys largest proprietary marketing databases that facilitates a review of the performance of avocados in various grocery stores located across the nation. Based on this data, we are able to assist our customers in developing programs that will increase their sales. Generally, we review the performance of stores relative to others within the same geographic area and make recommendations designed to increase both the per unit and total dollar sales of avocados within the produce section. |
We sell avocados to a diverse group of supermarket chains, wholesalers, food service and other
distributors, under the Calavo and private labels. The consolidation in the supermarket industry
has led to fewer, but bigger buyers. From time to time, sales are transacted via e-commerce. We
believe that our largest customers will require us and our competitors to implement one or more
e-commerce distribution solutions to facilitate their procurement and inventory management
programs. In our judgment, the shift to e-commerce by our largest customers will favorably impact
larger handlers like us, which have the ability and financial resources to support these
strategies. From time to time, some of our larger customers seek short-term sales contracts that
formalize their pricing and volume requirements. Generally, these contracts contain provisions
that establish a price floor and/or ceiling during the contract duration. Again, in our judgment,
the shift by our customers to drafting sales contracts benefits large handlers like us, which have
the ability to fulfill the terms of these contracts. During fiscal year 2005, our 5 and 25 largest
customers represented approximately 21% and 44% of our total consolidated revenues. During fiscal
years 2005, 2004 and 2003 none of our California avocado customers represented more than 10% of
total consolidated revenues.
International avocados and perishable food products
Our international avocados and perishable food products segment leverages our expertise in the
handling and marketing of California avocados. We believe that the sales generated by this segment
complement our offering of California avocados to our customers and stabilize the supply of
avocados during seasons of low California production. Sales generated by this segment include
avocados grown outside of California and other perishable food products, such as papayas, tomatoes,
ginger, and pineapple. We primarily market international avocados from Mexico, Chile, and the
Dominican Republic. We handle some of these products on a consignment basis for the suppliers.
Pursuant to these arrangements, from time to time, we make advances to Chilean handlers and Mexican
growers. We primarily make such advances related to both pre-harvest and post-harvest activities.
Our ability to recover pre-harvest advances is largely dependent on the growers ability to deliver
avocados to us and is subject to inherent risks of farming, such as weather and pests. Historical
experience demonstrates that providing post-harvest advances results in our acquiring full market
risk for the product, as it is possible that our resale proceeds may be less than the amounts we
paid to the grower. This is a result of the high level of volatility inherent in the avocado and
perishable food markets, which are subject to significant pricing declines based on the
availability of fruit in the market.
Net sales generated by our International avocados and perishable food products business depend
principally on the availability of Chilean and Mexican grown avocados in the U.S. markets. In
November 2004, the United States Department of Food and Agriculture (USDA) published a rule
allowing Hass avocado imports from Mexico into all 50 states year round (up from 31 states for only
a six month period), except for California, Florida, and Hawaii. We expect the restriction on such
states to be lifted in February 2007. For the remaining 47 states, however, Mexico was able to
deliver its fruit for all of fiscal 2005. The implementation of this rule resulted in a
significant increase in the sale of Mexican sourced fruit during fiscal 2005. See Item 7 for a
detailed description of such increase.
In 1998, we invested in the Mexican avocado market by building a packinghouse in Uruapan,
Mexico. We believe that our continued success in marketing Mexican avocados is largely dependent
upon securing a reliable, high-quality supply of avocados at reasonable prices. The Mexican
avocado harvest is both complimentary and competitive with the California market, as the Mexican
harvest typically runs from September to June. As a result, it is common for Mexican growers to
monitor the supply of avocados for
5
Table of Contents
export to the United States in order to obtain higher field prices. During 2005, we packed
and distributed approximately 21% of the avocados exported from Mexico into the United States and
approximately 12% of the avocados exported from Mexico to countries other than the United States,
based on our estimates.
In recent years, the volume of avocados exported by Chilean growers to the United States has
continued to increase. Chilean growers continue to increase avocado plantings to capitalize on
high returns available in the worldwide avocado markets. Sales of Chilean grown avocados have been
significant during our 4th and 1st fiscal quarters. Additionally, with the
Chilean harvesting season being complimentary to the California season (August through February),
Chilean avocados are able to command competitive retail pricing in the market. During 2005, we
distributed approximately 10% of the Chilean imports into the United States, based on our
estimates.
The Dominican Republic also exports avocados into the United States. The harvest of Dominican
Republic avocados (September to January) overlaps with the Chilean and Mexican avocado harvest
periods. As a result, the increased volume of avocados in the U.S. marketplace related to
Dominican Republic sourced fruit has the effect of increasing pressure on sales prices. During
2005, we distributed substantially all of the Dominican Republic imports into the United States,
based on our estimates.
In recent years, our distribution of other perishable food products has generally been limited
to papayas procured from a Hawaiian packing operation, which is owned by the Chairman of our Board
of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President. The acquisition of Maui, however, expanded
our perishable food products to include additional papayas, tomatoes, chili peppers, pineapples,
and ginger. While Maui has numerous product offerings, the aforementioned commodities account for
the majority of its sales.
Maui has operations in Arizona, California, and Hawaii. The primary focus of these operations
is the growing, shipping and distribution of fresh produce. Maui primarily sources its products
from the United States and Mexico. Sales for fiscal year 2005 were approximately $21.7 million.
Maui has customers located primarily in the United States and Canada and these customers are
principally in the retail, foodservice, and wholesale sectors. Maui does not experience
significant fluctuations in sales related to seasonality.
Processed Products
In the 1960s and early 1970s, we pioneered the process of freezing avocado pulp and
developed a wide variety of guacamole recipes to address the diverse tastes of consumers and buyers
in the food service industry. Our customers include both companies in the food service industry
and the retail business. Sales are made principally through a commissioned nationwide broker
network, which is supported by our regional sales managers. We believe that our marketing strength
is distinguished by providing quality products, innovation, year-round product availability,
strategically located warehouses, and market relationships. During fiscal year 2005, our 5 and 25
largest customers represented approximately 7% and 10% of our total consolidated revenues. During
fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003 none of our processed product customers represented more than 10%
of total consolidated revenues.
The food service and retail industries have continued a trend of business consolidation
resulting in larger customers, but a smaller number of customers for our processed products. From
time to time, in order to secure the ongoing business of some of our largest customers, we enter
into certain rebate programs and agreements. While we made no such payments during fiscal 2005 or
2004, we believe that customers will continue to request payment to secure either a certain volume
of product or preferred status as a provider of processed products will continue.
The processed product segment was originally conceived as a mechanism to stabilize the price
of California avocados by reducing the volume of avocados available to the marketplace. With the
introduction of low cost processed products delivered from Mexican based processors, however, we
realigned the segments strategy by shifting the fruit procurement and pulp processing functions to
Mexico. In 1995, we invested in a processing plant in Mexicali, Mexico to derive the benefit of
competitive avocado prices available in Mexico.
In February 2003, our Board of Directors approved a plan whereby the operations of our
processed products business would be relocated. The plan called for the closing of our Santa
Paula, California and Mexicali, Baja California Norte (Mexicali) processing facilities and
relocating these operations to a new facility in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico (Uruapan). This
restructuring has provided for cost savings in the elimination of certain transportation costs,
duplicative overhead structures, and savings in the overall cost of labor and services. The
Uruapan facility commenced operations in February 2004 and the Santa Paula and Mexicali facilities
ceased production in February 2003 and August 2004.
Through January 2003, the primary function of our Mexicali processed operation was to produce
pulp for our Santa Paula plant. Our processing facility in Santa Paula, California would receive
the pulp from Mexicali, add ingredients, and package the product in
6
Table of Contents
various containers. The product would then be frozen for storage with shipment to warehouses and,
ultimately, to our customers. From January 2003 to August 2004, however, our Mexicali processed
operations became primarily focused on our individually quick frozen (IQF) avocado half product
line and one of our high-pressure lines.
Our IQF line provides food service and retail customers with peeled avocado halves that are
ripe and suitable for immediate consumption. These halves were frozen, packaged and shipped out of
Mexicali to warehouses located in the U.S., and, ultimately, to our customers.
During fiscal year 2005, we operated one high-pressure line designed to manufacture processed
avocado products that are not frozen (guacamole) in Uruapan. This machine ran at about 60%
capacity (with one shift) through October 2005. We anticipate that we will operate such
high-pressure machine at a higher capacity during fiscal year 2006. We presently own another, much
smaller, high-pressure machine, located in Uruapan, that is currently not in use. We are
considering various alternatives with such machine, including trading such machine in for credit
towards another high-pressure machine with similar capacity as our high-pressure machine that is
currently in use in Uruapan. Utilizing avocado pulp and chunks, these high-pressure machines allow
us to deliver fresh guacamole to retail and food service customers. Sales of our high-pressure
product totaled approximately $8.7 million and $5.5 million for fiscal years 2005 and 2004.
Although the additions of these product offerings are fairly recent, we believe that these
high pressure machines will position our company to deliver the widest available array of processed
avocado products to our customers. Consequently, we believe we are currently the only single
source company supplying the complete range of processed avocado products, including frozen
guacamole, ultra high pressure treated guacamole, and frozen avocado halves to foodservice and
retail customers.
Sales and Other Financial Information by Business Segment and Product Category
Sales and other financial information by business segment are provided in Note 11 to our
consolidated financial statements that are included in this Annual Report.
Patents and Trademarks
Our trademarks include the Calavo brand name and related logos. We also utilize the following
trademarks in conducting our business: Avo Fresco, Bueno, Calavo Gold, Celebrate the Taste, El
Dorado, Fresh Ripe, Select, Taste of Paradise, The First Name in Avocados, Tico, Mfresh, and
Triggered Avocados.
Working Capital Requirements
Generally, we make payments to our California avocado growers and other suppliers in advance
of collecting all of the related accounts receivable. We generally bridge the timing between
vendor payments and customer receipts by using operating cash flows and commercial bank borrowings.
In addition, we provide crop loans and other advances to some of our growers, which are also
funded through operating cash flows and borrowings. We generally experience larger levels of
commercial bank borrowings during the California Hass avocado crop harvesting season.
Our international avocados and perishable food products business requires working capital to
finance the payment of advances to suppliers, and collection of accounts receivable. These working
capital needs are also financed through the use of operating cash flows and bank borrowings and are
generally concentrated during the Chilean Hass avocado crop harvesting season.
With respect to our processed products business, we require working capital to finance the
production of our processed avocado products, building and maintaining an adequate supply of
finished product, and collecting our accounts receivable balances. These working capital needs are
financed through the use of operating cash flows and bank borrowings.
Backlog
Our customers do not place product orders significantly in advance of the requested product
delivery dates. Customers typically order perishable products two to ten days in advance of
shipment, and typically order processed products within thirty days in advance of shipment.
7
Table of Contents
Research and Development
We do not undertake significant research and development efforts. Research and development
programs, if any, are limited to the continuous process of refining and developing new techniques
to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of our processed products operations and the handling,
ripening, storage, and packing of fresh avocados.
Compliance with Government Regulations
The California State Department of Food and Agriculture oversees the packing and processing of
avocados and conducts tests for fruit quality and packaging standards. All of our packages are
stamped with the state seal as meeting standards. Various states have instituted regulations
providing differing levels of oversight with respect to weights and measures, as well as quality
standards.
The USDA regulates and reviews imported food products. In particular, the USDA regulates the
distribution of Mexican avocados within 47 states in the U.S. by requiring avocado importers and
handlers to execute compliance agreements. These agreements represent an acknowledgment by
handlers of the distribution restrictions placed on Mexican avocados and are used as a tool to
ensure compliance with existing regulations. From time to time, we have been approached by USDA
representatives in their oversight of the compliance agreement process. We continue to consult
with USDA representatives to ensure that our systems of internal control provide a high level of
reliability in securing compliance agreements on behalf of our customers.
As a manufacturer and marketer of processed avocado products, our operations are subject to
extensive regulation by various federal government agencies, including the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), the USDA and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), as well as state and local
agencies, with respect to production processes, product attributes, packaging, labeling, storage
and distribution. Under various statutes and regulations, these agencies prescribe requirements and
establish standards for safety, purity and labeling. In addition, advertising of our products is
subject to regulation by the FTC, and our operations are subject to certain health and safety
regulations, including those issued under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Our
manufacturing facilities and products are subject to periodic inspection by federal, state and
local authorities.
As a result of our agricultural and food processing activities, we are subject to numerous
environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations govern the treatment, handling,
storage and disposal of materials and waste and the remediation of contaminated properties.
We seek to comply at all times with all such laws and regulations and to obtain any necessary
permits and licenses, and we are not aware of any instances of material non-compliance. We believe
our facilities and practices are sufficient to maintain compliance with applicable governmental
laws, regulations, permits and licenses. Nevertheless, there is no guarantee that we will be able
to comply with any future laws and regulations or requirements for necessary permits and licenses.
Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations or obtain any necessary permits and
licenses could subject us to civil remedies including fines, injunctions, recalls or seizures, as
well as potential criminal sanctions.
Employees
As of October 31, 2005, we had approximately 700 employees, of which approximately 230 were
located in the United States and 470 were located in Mexico. None of Calavos United States
employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Approximately 460 of Calavos Mexican
employees are represented by a union. We consider the relationship with our employees to be good
and we have never experienced a significant work stoppage.
The following is a summary of the number of salaried and hourly employees as of October
31, 2005.
Location | Salaried | Hourly | ||||||
United States |
88 | 144 | ||||||
Mexico |
64 | 405 | ||||||
TOTAL |
152 | 549 | ||||||
Although agriculture is a seasonal industry, avocados have a wider window of production than
most perishable commodities. Consequently, we employ hourly personnel more routinely throughout the
year when compared to other agriculture-dependent companies.
8
Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Business
We are subject to increasing competition that may adversely affect our operating results.
The market for avocados and processed avocado products is highly competitive and affects each
of our businesses. Each of our businesses is subject to competitive pressures, including the
following:
| Our California avocado business is impacted by an increasing volume of foreign grown avocados being imported into the United States. Recently, there have been significant plantings of avocados in Mexico, Chile, New Zealand, the Dominican Republic, and other parts of the world, which have had, and will continue to have, the effect of increasing the volume of foreign grown avocados entering the United States market. Generally, an increase in foreign grown avocados in the markets we distribute in has the effect of lowering prices for California grown avocados and adversely impacting our results from operations. | ||
| Our California avocado business is subject to competition from other California avocado handlers. If we are unable to consistently pay California growers a competitive price for their avocados, these growers may choose to have their avocados marketed by alternate handlers. | ||
| Our international avocados and perishable food products business is impacted by competitors operating in Mexico. Generally, handlers of Mexican grown avocados operate facilities that are substantially smaller than our facility in Uruapan, Mexico. If we are unable to pack and market a sufficient volume of Mexican grown avocados, smaller handlers will have a lower per unit cost and be able to offer Mexican avocados at a more competitive price to our customers. | ||
| Our international avocados and perishable food products business is also subject to competition from other California avocado handlers that market Chilean grown avocados. If we are unable to consistently pay Chilean packers a competitive price for their avocados, these packers may choose to have their avocados marketed by alternate handlers. | ||
| Our processed products business is impacted by demand for our product. If we are unable to produce a sufficient volume of processed products at our existing facilities, our competitors may be able to offer processed products at a more competitive price to our customers. |
We are subject to the risks of doing business internationally.
We conduct a substantial amount of business with growers and customers who are located outside
the United States. We purchase avocados from foreign growers and packers, sell fresh avocados and
processed avocado products to foreign customers, and operate a packinghouse and a processing plant
in Mexico. For additional information about our international business operations, see the
Business section included in this Annual Report.
Our current international operations are subject to a number of inherent risks, including:
| Local economic and political conditions, including disruptions in trading and capital markets; | ||
| Restrictive foreign governmental actions, such as restrictions on transfers of funds and trade protection measures, including export duties and quotas and customs duties and tariffs; | ||
| Changes in legal or regulatory requirements affecting foreign investment, loans, taxes, imports, and exports; and | ||
| Currency exchange rate fluctuations which, depending upon the nature of the changes, may make our domestic-sourced products more expensive compared to foreign grown products or may increase our cost of obtaining foreign-sourced products. |
We and our growers are subject to the risks that are inherent in farming.
Our results of operations may be adversely affected by numerous factors over which we have
little or no control and that are inherent in farming, including reductions in the market prices
for our products, adverse weather and growing conditions, pest and disease problems, and new
government regulations regarding farming and the marketing of agricultural products.
9
Table of Contents
We are subject to rapidly changing USDA and FDA regulations which govern the importation of foreign
avocados into the United States and the processing of processed avocado products.
The USDA has established, and continues to modify, regulations governing the importation of
avocados into the United States. Our permits that allow us to import foreign-sourced avocados into
the United States generally are contingent on our compliance with these regulations. Our results
of operations may be adversely affected if we are unable to comply with existing and modified
regulations and are unable to secure avocado import permits in the future.
The FDA establishes, and continues to modify, regulations governing the production of
processed avocado products. Our results of operations may be adversely affected if we are unable
to comply with existing and modified regulations.
Our business could be adversely affected if we lost key members of our management.
We are dependent on the efforts and performance of our current directors and officers. If we
were to lose any key members of management, our business could be adversely affected. You should
read the information under Executive Officers in this Annual Report for additional information
about our management.
The acquisition of other businesses could pose risks to our operating income.
We intend to review acquisition prospects that would complement our business. While we are
not currently a party to any agreement with respect to any acquisitions, we may acquire other
businesses in the future. Future acquisitions by us could result in accounting charges,
potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, and increased debt and contingent liabilities,
any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and the market price of our
common stock. Acquisitions entail numerous risks, including the assimilation of the acquired
operations, diversion of managements attention to other business concerns, risks of entering
markets in which we have limited prior experience, and the potential loss of key employees of
acquired organizations. We may be unable to successfully integrate businesses or the personnel of
any business that might be acquired in the future, and our failure to do so could have a material
adverse effect on our business and on the market price of our common stock.
Our ability to competitively serve our customers is a function of reliable and low cost
transportation. Disruption of the supply of these services and/or significant increases in the cost
of these services could impact our operating income.
We use multiple forms of transportation to bring our products to market. They include ocean,
truck, and air-cargo. Disruption to the timely supply of these services or dramatic increases in
the cost of these services for any reason including availability of fuel for such services, labor
disputes, or governmental restrictions limiting specific forms of transportation could have an
adverse effect on our ability to serve our customers and consumers and could have an adverse effect
on our financial performance.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
We lease our corporate headquarters building. Additionally, we own two packinghouses and one
processing facility in California, lease one packinghouse in California, own one processing
facility in Mexico, and lease one packinghouse in Mexico.
In March 2005, we completed the sale of our corporate headquarters building (located in Santa
Ana, CA) for $3.4 million. In conjunction with such sale, we relocated our corporate offices to
Santa Paula, California in March 2005. We currently lease our corporate headquarters from
Limoneira (see note 12 to the consolidated financial statements).
Our two California packinghouses handle avocados delivered to us by California and Chilean
growers. The Temecula, California facility was built in 1985 and has been improved in capacity and
efficiency since then. The Santa Paula, California facility was purchased in 1955 and has had
recent equipment improvements equivalent to our Temecula facility. We believe that the combined
annual capacity of the two packinghouses, under normal workweek operations, is sufficient to pack
the annually budgeted volume of California avocados delivered to us by our growers.
Our Santa Paula, California processing facility was built in 1975 and had a major expansion in
1988. In conjunction with our restructuring plan, which was approved in February 2003, this
facility ceased operating as a processed product avocado processing facility and now functions
primarily as a ripening and storage facility for our fresh avocado operation. Additionally, it
also serves to store certain processed avocado products as well. Also, effective December 2005,
certain operations of our leased Vernon, California
10
Table of Contents
packinghouse operation has been relocated to this facility. We believe that the annual
capacity of this facility will be sufficient to pack the expected annual volume of specialty
commodities delivered to us.
Our leased Vernon, California packinghouse primarily handles avocados and tropical
commodities. We are committed to leasing the facility through 2006. Presently, we are using this
facility for storage and packing purposes, but are also exploring opportunities to sublet this
facility as well.
Our owned processing facility in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico was constructed pursuant to our
restructuring plan approved in February 2003. This facility commenced operations in February 2004.
We believe that the annual capacity of this facility will be sufficient to process our budgeted
annual production needs.
Our Mexicali, Mexico processing plant was built in 1995 to our specifications. In conjunction
with our restructuring plan, we ceased production at this facility in August 2004. Our lease
commitment for this facility ended in December 2004 and we have not extended such lease.
Our Uruapan, Mexico packinghouse, owned by the same landlord as our Mexicali facility, was
also built to our specifications. We are committed to leasing the facility through 2008 and have
the option to purchase such facility at the end of the lease term. We believe that the annual
capacity of this facility will be sufficient to process our budgeted annual production needs.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we become involved in legal proceedings that are related to our business
operations. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings that could have a material
adverse effect upon our financial position or results of operations.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the quarter ended October 31,
2005.
11
Table of Contents
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of individuals who hold positions as
executive officers of our company. There are no family relationships between any director or
executive officer and any other director or executive officer of our company. Executive officers
are elected by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board.
Name | Age | Position | ||||
Lecil E. Cole
|
65 | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President | ||||
Arthur J. Bruno
|
55 | Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary | ||||
Robert J. Wedin
|
56 | Vice President, Sales and Fresh Marketing | ||||
Alan C. Ahmer
|
57 | Vice President, Processed Product Sales and Production | ||||
Michael A. Browne
|
46 | Vice President, Fresh Operations |
Lecil E. Cole has been a member of our board of directors since February 1982 and has served
as Chairman of the Board since 1988. Mr. Cole has also served as our Chief Executive Officer and
President since February 1999. He served as an executive of Safeway Stores from 1964 to 1976 and
as Chairman of Central Coast Federal Land Bank from 1986 to 1996. Mr. Cole has served as Chairman
and President of Hawaiian Sweet, Inc. and Tropical Hawaiian Products, Inc. since 1996. Mr. Cole
farms a total of 4,430 acres in California and Hawaii on which avocados, papayas, and cattle are
produced and raised.
Arthur J. Bruno has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary since
October 2003. During fiscal 2004, Mr. Bruno also assumed the title and responsibilities of Chief
Operating Officer. From 1988 to 2003, Mr. Bruno served as the president and co-founder of Maui
Fresh International, Inc. Mr. Bruno is a Certified Public Accountant.
Robert J. Wedin has served as our Vice President since 1993. Mr. Wedin joined us in 1973 at
our then Santa Barbara packinghouse. Beginning in 1990, Mr. Wedin served as a director of the
California Avocado Commission for a period of ten years. Mr. Wedin currently is a board member of
Producesupply.org and serves as a member of that organizations executive committee.
Alan C. Ahmer has served as our Vice President since 1989. Mr. Ahmer joined us in 1979 as a
regional sales manager in our processed products business. In September 2003, Mr. Ahmers new
title became Vice-President, Processed Products Sales and Production.
Michael A. Browne has served as our Vice President since 2005. From 1997 until joining us,
Mr. Browne served as the founder and co-owner of Fresh Directions International, a closely held
multinational fresh produce company, which marketed fresh avocados from Mexico, Chile, and the
Dominican Republic. Mr. Browne joined us in May 2005.
12
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In March 2002, our common stock began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol
CVGW. In July 2002, our common stock began trading on the Nasdaq National Market under the
symbol CVGW.
The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per
share of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.
Fiscal 2004 | High | Low | ||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 11.60 | $ | 9.75 | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 10.90 | $ | 9.80 | ||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 13.00 | $ | 10.08 | ||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 12.27 | $ | 10.50 |
Fiscal 2005 | High | Low | ||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 12.38 | $ | 10.10 | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 11.81 | $ | 9.76 | ||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 10.92 | $ | 10.00 | ||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 10.25 | $ | 8.66 |
As of October 31, 2005, there were approximately 1,400 stockholders of record of our common
stock.
During the year ended October 31, 2005, we did not issue any shares of common stock that were
not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, save for the shares issued to Limoneira Company
(see Note 12 in consolidated financial statements). The issuance of the shares discussed in the
preceding sentence was exempt from registration by reason of the exemption provided by Section 4(2)
of the Securities Act of 1933 for offers and sales of securities that do not involve a public
offering.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Shares
Total Number of | ||||||||||||||||
Shares Purchased as | Approximate Dollar Value of | |||||||||||||||
Total Number | Average | Part of Publicly | Shares that May Yet Be | |||||||||||||
Of Shares | Price Paid | Announced | Purchased under the | |||||||||||||
Purchased | Per Share | Plans or Programs | Plans or Programs | |||||||||||||
Month #1 (August 2005) |
200,000 | $ | 10.00 | | $ | | ||||||||||
Month #2 (September 2005) |
| | | |||||||||||||
Month #3 (October 2005) |
| | | |||||||||||||
Total |
200,000 | $ | 10.00 | | $ | | ||||||||||
From time to time, our Board of Directors will authorize the repurchase of shares
opportunistically. Such repurchases may be in the open market or in private transactions. The
repurchase shown above relates to a private transaction and is from a related party. See Note 9 in
consolidated financial statements.
Dividend Policy
Our dividend policy is to provide for an annual dividend payment, as determined by the Board
of Directors. We anticipate that dividends will be paid in the first quarter of our fiscal year.
On January 3, 2005, we paid a $0.30 per share dividend in the aggregate amount of $4,052,000
to shareholders of record on November 15, 2004.
On January 3, 2006, we paid a $0.32 per share dividend in the aggregate amount of $4,564,000
to shareholders of record on December 15, 2005.
13
Table of Contents
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following summary consolidated financial data (other than pounds information) for each of
the years in the five-year period ended October 31, 2005 are derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements of Calavo Growers, Inc. and our predecessor, Calavo Growers of California.
Historical results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected in any
future period. The following data should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Fiscal Year Ended October 31,2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data: (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 258,822 | $ | 274,218 | $ | 246,761 | $ | 242,671 | $ | 217,704 | ||||||||||
Gross margin |
21,734 | 25,404 | 25,465 | 25,823 | 18,808 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
3,322 | 6,210 | 7,160 | 6,915 | 3,838 | |||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted net income per share(2) |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.37 | ||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data as of End of
Period: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Working capital |
$ | 17,618 | $ | 20,353 | $ | 20,735 | $ | 18,833 | $ | 9,799 | ||||||||||
Total assets(5) |
108,482 | 67,398 | 53,689 | 55,132 | 52,368 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term debt(5) |
1,313 | 22 | 24 | 3,222 | 16,241 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion(3)(5) |
11,719 | 34 | 61 | 3,180 | 3,429 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
64,746 | 43,937 | 37,147 | 30,556 | 20,029 | |||||||||||||||
Cash Flows Provided by (Used in): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations |
$ | 5,964 | $ | 4,460 | $ | 15,222 | $ | 8,135 | $ | 1,161 | ||||||||||
Investing(4)(5) |
(22,337 | ) | (8,474 | ) | (4,475 | ) | (2,078 | ) | (2,029 | ) | ||||||||||
Financing(5) |
16,870 | (725 | ) | (6,293 | ) | (7,193 | ) | 1,433 | ||||||||||||
Other Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends per share (2) |
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.50 | ||||||||||
Net book value per share |
$ | 4.51 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 2.87 | $ | 2.38 | $ | 2.01 | ||||||||||
Pounds of California avocados sold |
104,950 | 152,725 | 122,950 | 158,187 | 163,891 | |||||||||||||||
Pounds of international avocados sold |
103,830 | 69,410 | 70,348 | 69,512 | 44,935 | |||||||||||||||
Pounds of processed avocados products sold |
15,628 | 13,317 | 14,707 | 14,248 | 14,788 |
(1) | Operating results for fiscal years 2005 and 2004 include the acquisition of Maui. For fiscal year 2005, Mauis net sales, gross margins, and net income were as follows: $21.7 million, $1.1 million, and $0.4 million. For fiscal year 2004, Mauis net sales, gross margins, and net income were as follows: $19.8 million, $1.4 million, and $0.5 million. | |
(2) | Dividends per share for fiscal 2001 represent the payment of our dividend to shareholders for the results of our fiscal 2000 operations. We did not declare a cash dividend in connection with our fiscal 2001 operating results. In December 2001, we declared a 5% stock dividend payable February 15, 2002 for all shareholders of record as of February 1, 2002. Dividends per share and net book value per share are computed based on the actual shares outstanding. | |
(3) | In July 2003, our Board of Directors approved the retirement of our Industrial Development Revenue Bond. The bonds were initially floated to provide the financing to construct our Temecula, California packinghouse. We repaid the final $2.8 million in principal under the indenture in September 2003. | |
(4) | Cash flows used in investing activities for fiscal 2004 and 2003 include the effect of constructing a processing facility in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico. The Uruapan facility commenced operations in February 2004. | |
(5) | Total assets, short-term debt, long-term debt, cash flows used in investing activities, and cash flows provided by financing activities for fiscal 2005 include the effect of the stock purchase agreement with Limoneira Company. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements. |
14
Table of Contents
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results
of operations together with Selected Consolidated Financial Data and our consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion and
analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions.
Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as
a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, those presented under Risks related to
our business included in Item 1A and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Overview
We are a leader in the distribution of avocados, processed avocado products, and other
perishable food products throughout the United States and elsewhere in the world. Our history and
expertise in handling California grown avocados has allowed us to develop a reputation of
delivering quality products, at competitive prices, while providing a competitive return to our
growers. This reputation has enabled us to expand our product offering to include avocados sourced
on an international basis, processed avocado products, and other perishable foods. We report these
operations in three business segments: California avocados, international avocados and other
perishable food products and processed products. We report our financial results on a November 1
to October 31 fiscal year basis to coincide with the California avocado harvest season.
On October 9, 2001, we completed a series of transactions whereby common and preferred
shareholders of Calavo Growers of California, an agricultural marketing cooperative association,
exchanged all of their outstanding shares for shares of our common stock. Concurrently with this
transaction, the Cooperative was merged into us with Calavo emerging as the surviving entity.
These transactions had the effect of converting the legal structure of the business from a
non-profit cooperative to a for-profit corporation. The merger and the conversion were approved on
an overwhelming basis by both the Cooperatives shareholders and our board of directors. Prior to
the merger, the Cooperative reported results of operations as constituting either member (the
packing and distribution of avocados procured from either members or associate members) or
non-member business (non-member business included both the processed product business and the
sourcing and distribution of all crops that were not procured from the Cooperatives members).
In June 2005, in order to increase our market share of California avocados and increase
synergies within the marketplace, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Limoneira Company
(Limoneira). Pursuant to such agreement, we acquired approximately 15.1% of Limoneiras
outstanding common stock for $23.45 million and Limoneira acquired approximately 6.9% of our
outstanding common stock for $10 million. The transaction was
settled by a net cash payment by us of $13.45 million. Additionally, such agreement also provided for: (1)
Calavo to lease office space from Limoneira in Santa Paula, California for a period of 10 years at
an initial annual gross rental of approximately $0.2 million (subject to annual CPI increases, as
defined), (2) Calavo to market Limoneiras avocados and (3) Calavo and Limoneira to use good faith
reasonable efforts to maximize avocado packing efficiencies for both parties by consolidating their
fruit packing operations. Various opportunities are currently being considered, including the use
of existing packing facilities, an investment in existing vacant facilities, and/or an investment
in a new consolidated facility for both parties.
Limoneira, which generated total revenues of approximately $26 million during fiscal 2004,
primarily engages in growing citrus and avocados, picking and hauling citrus, and packing lemons.
Our California avocado business grades, sizes, packs and cools avocados grown in California
for delivery to our customers. We presently operate three packinghouses in Southern California.
These packinghouses handled approximately 35% of the California avocado crop during the 2005 fiscal
year, based on data obtained from the California Avocado Commission. Our operating results and the
returns we pay our growers are highly dependent on the volume of avocados delivered to our
packinghouses, as a significant portion of our costs are fixed. Our strategy calls for continued
efforts in retaining existing growers, aggressively recruiting new growers, and procuring a larger
percentage of the California avocado crop to improve our results from operations.
Our international and perishable food products business procures avocados grown in Mexico,
Chile, and the Dominican Republic, as well as other various commodities, including papayas,
tomatoes, chili peppers, pineapples, and ginger. We operate a packinghouse in Mexico that handled
approximately 21% of the Mexican avocado crop bound for the United States market during the
2004-2005 Mexican harvest season, based on our estimates. Additionally, during the 2004-2005
Chilean avocado harvest season, we handled approximately 10% of the Chilean avocado crop, based on
our estimates. Our strategy is to procure and sell the internationally grown avocados to
complement our distribution efforts of California grown avocados. We believe that the introduction
of these avocados, although competitive at times with California grown avocados, provides a level
of supply stability that may, over time, help solidify the demand for avocados among consumers in
the United States and elsewhere in the world. We believe our efforts in distributing our other
various commodities, such as those shown above, complement our offerings of avocados. From time to
time, we continue to explore distribution of other crops that provide reasonable returns to the
business.
15
Table of Contents
Our processed products business procures avocados, processes avocados into a wide variety of
guacamole products, and distributes the processed product to our customers. In February 2003, our
Board of Directors approved a plan whereby the operations of our processed products business would
be relocated. The plan called for the closing of our Santa Paula, California and Mexicali, Baja
California Norte processing facilities and the relocation of these operations to a new facility in
Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico. This restructuring has provided for cost savings in the elimination of
certain transportation costs, duplicative overhead structures, and savings in the overall cost of
labor and services. The Uruapan facility commenced operations in February 2004 and the Santa Paula
and Mexicali facilities were closed in February 2003 and August 2004. During fiscal 2005, we
incurred costs related to this restructuring approximating $0.4 million, which are recorded in our
income statement as both cost of sales ($0.3 million) and selling, general and administrative
expenses ($0.1 million). All the above amounts have been paid and we do not expect any additional
operating costs related to this restructuring.
Processed products customers include both food service industry and retail businesses. Our
strategy calls for the development of new guacamole recipes and other processed avocado products
that address the diverse taste of todays consumers. We also seek to expand our relationships with
major food service companies and develop alliances that will allow our products to reach a larger
percentage of the marketplace.
Our California avocado and international and perishable food product businesses are highly
seasonal and are characterized by rapid crop volume and price changes. Furthermore, the operating
results of all of our businesses, including our processed products business, have been, and will
continue to be, affected by substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations and market downturns due
to a number of factors, such as pests and disease, weather patterns, changes in demand by
consumers, the timing of the receipt, reduction, or cancellation of significant customer orders,
the gain or loss of significant customers, market acceptance of our products, our ability to
develop, introduce, and market new products on a timely basis, availability and cost of avocados
and supplies from growers and vendors, new product introductions by our competitors, change in the
mix of avocados and processed products we sell, and general economic conditions. We believe,
however, that we are currently positioned to address these risks and deliver favorable operating
results for the foreseeable future.
Recent Developments
Dividend Payment
In January 2006, we paid a $0.32 per share dividend in the aggregate amount of $4,564,000 to
shareholders of record on December 15, 2005.
Corporate headquarters building
In March 2005, we completed the sale of our old corporate headquarters building (located in
Santa Ana) for $3.4 million. This transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain on sale of approximately
$1.7 million. In conjunction with such sale, we relocated our corporate offices to Santa Paula,
California in March 2005. Total expenses related to such relocation approximated $0.4 million.
Stock Option Grant
In August 2005, our Board of Directors approved the issuance of options to acquire a total of
400,000 shares of our common stock to various employees of the Company. The options vest if the
closing price of our common stock is at least $11.00 per share at any time throughout the life of
the option. At no time, however, may any options vest within one year from the date of grant.
Additionally, such options have an exercise price of $9.10 per share and a term of 5 years from the
grant date. The market price of our common stock at the grant date was $9.10.
Term loan agreement
In July 2005, we entered into a non-collateralized term loan agreement with Farm Credit West,
PCA to finance the purchase of our Limoneira Stock. Pursuant to such agreement, we borrowed $13.0
million, which is to be repaid in 10 annual installments of $1.3 million. Such annual installments
begin July 2006 and continue through July 2015. Interest is to be paid monthly, in arrears,
beginning August 2005 through the life of the loan. Such loan bears interest at a fixed rate of
5.70%.
Such loan contains various financial covenants, which are substantially identical to existing
covenants, with which we were in compliance at October 31, 2005. The most significant financial
covenants relate to working capital, tangible net worth (as defined), and Earnings Before Interest,
Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) (as defined) requirements.
16
Table of Contents
Useful lives of property, plant and equipment
Effective May 1, 2005, based on a review performed by us, we changed our estimate of useful
lives of certain property, plant and equipment. The principal estimated useful lives were:
buildings and improvements 7 to 30 years; leasehold improvements the lesser of the term of the
lease or 7 years; equipment 7 years; information systems hardware and software 3 to 5 years.
The revised estimated useful lives are: buildings and improvements 7 to 50 years; leasehold
improvements the lesser of the term of the lease or 7 years; equipment 7 to 25 years;
information systems hardware and software 3 to 15 years. The change in estimated useful lives
increased our operating income by approximately $0.4 million during the six months ended October
31, 2005 when compared to the old useful lives.
Retirement of Common Stock
In
August 2005, we repurchased 200,000 shares of our common
stock at an average price per share of $10.00 from the estate of a
deceased former member of our Board of Directors. In
December 2005, we repurchased another 120,000 shares of our common stock
at an average price per share of $10.00 from the same estate.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based
upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we re-evaluate all of our estimates,
including those related to the areas of customer and grower receivables, inventories, useful lives
of property, plant and equipment, promotional allowances, income taxes, retirement benefits, and
commitments and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions as additional information becomes available in future
periods.
Management has discussed the development and selection of critical accounting estimates with
the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed our disclosure
relating to critical accounting estimates in this Annual Report.
We believe the following are the more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Promotional allowances. We provide for promotional allowances at the time of sale, based on
our historical experience. Our estimates are generally based on evaluating the average length of
time between the product shipment date and the date on which we pay the customer the promotional
allowance. The product of this lag factor and our historical promotional allowance payment rate is
the basis for the promotional allowance included in accrued expenses on our balance sheet. Actual
amounts may differ from these estimates and such differences are recognized as an adjustment to net
sales in the period they are identified.
Goodwill and acquired intangible assets. The purchase method of accounting for business
combinations requires us to make use of estimates and judgments to allocate the purchase price paid
for acquisitions to the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets.
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually, or when a possible impairment is indicated, using the
fair value based test prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The impairment test requires us to compare the fair value of
business reporting units to carrying value, including goodwill. We primarily use an income
approach (which considers the present value of future cash flows) in combination with a market
approach (which considers what other purchasers in the marketplace have paid for similar
businesses) to determine fair value. Future cash flows typically include operating cash flows for
the business for five years and an estimated terminal value. Management judgment is required in
the estimation of future operating results and to determine the appropriate terminal values.
Future operating results and terminal values could differ from the estimates and could require a
provision for impairment in a future period.
Allowance for accounts receivable. We provide an allowance for estimated uncollectible
accounts receivable balances based on historical experience and the aging of the related accounts
receivable. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an
impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Revenue recognition. Sales of products and related costs of products sold are recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, shipment has been made, title passes, the price is
fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Service revenue, including
freight, ripening, storage, bagging and palletization charges, is recorded when services are
performed and sales of the related products are delivered.
17
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain items from our consolidated statements of income,
expressed as percentages of our total net sales, for the periods indicated:
Year ended October 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Gross margins |
8.4 | % | 9.3 | % | 10.3 | % | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
7.2 | % | 5.8 | % | 6.0 | % | ||||||
Operating income |
1.2 | % | 3.4 | % | 4.3 | % | ||||||
Other income, net |
0.9 | % | 0.2 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||||
Net income |
1.3 | % | 2.3 | % | 2.9 | % |
Net Sales
We believe that the fundamentals for our products continue to be favorable. Government census
studies continue to indicate a shift in the demographics of the U.S. population in which larger
portions of the population descend from a Hispanic origin. Avocados are considered a staple item
purchased by Hispanic consumers and their acceptance as part of American cuisine continues to spur
demand for our products. We anticipate avocado products will further penetrate the United States
marketplace driven by growth in the Hispanic community and general acceptance in American cuisine.
As the largest marketer of avocado products in the United States, we believe that we are well
positioned to leverage this trend and to grow all segments of our business. Additionally, we also
believe that avocados and avocado based products will further penetrate other marketplaces that we
currently operate in, as interest in avocados continues to expand.
Sales of products and related costs of products sold are recognized when persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, shipment has been made, title passes, the price is fixed or determinable
and collectibility is reasonably assured. Service revenue, including freight, ripening, storage,
bagging and palletization charges, is recorded when services are performed and sales of the related
products are delivered. We provide for sales returns and promotional allowances at the time of
shipment, based on our experience. The following table summarizes our net sales by business
segment:
2005 | Change | 2004 | Change | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||
California avocados |
$ | 116,308 | (28.9 | )% | $ | 163,486 | 9.3 | % | $ | 149,635 | ||||||||||
International avocados and
perishable food products |
129,831 | 37.5 | % | 94,423 | 25.3 | % | 75,347 | |||||||||||||
Processed products |
34,699 | 6.0 | % | 32,749 | 1.2 | % | 32,360 | |||||||||||||
Eliminations |
(22,016 | ) | (16,440 | ) | (10,581 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 258,822 | (5.6 | )% | $ | 274,218 | 11.1 | % | $ | 246,761 | ||||||||||
As a percentage of net sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||
California avocados |
43.3 | % | 59.0 | % | 60.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
International avocados and
perishable food products |
45.7 | % | 31.6 | % | 28.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Processed products |
11.0 | % | 9.4 | % | 11.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net sales for the year ended October 31, 2005, when compared to 2004, decreased by
approximately $15.4 million, or 5.6%, principally as a result of a decrease in our California
avocados segment, partially offset by an increase in our and International avocados and perishable
food products segment. The decrease in sales related to our California avocados segment was
primarily driven by a smaller overall harvest of the California avocado crop for the 2004/2005
season, while the increase in our international avocados and perishable food products segment was
driven primarily by an increase in the volume of avocados being imported from Mexico.
Net sales generated by our International avocados and perishable food products business depend
principally on the availability of Chilean and Mexican grown avocados in the U.S. markets. In
November 2004, the USDA published a rule allowing Hass avocado imports from Mexico into all 50
states year round (up from 31 states for only a six month period), except for California, Florida,
and Hawaii. We expect the restriction on such states to be lifted in February 2007. For the
remaining 47 states, however, Mexico was able to deliver its fruit for all of fiscal 2005. The
implementation of this rule resulted in a significant increase in the sale of Mexican sourced fruit
during fiscal 2005.
18
Table of Contents
The following tables set forth sales by product category, freight and other charges and sales
incentives, by segment (dollars in thousands):
Year ended October 31, 2005 | Year ended October 31, 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
International | International | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
avocados and | avocados and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
perishable | perishable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
California | food | Processed | California | food | Processed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
avocados | products | products | Total | avocados | products | products | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third-party sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
California avocados |
$ | 104,481 | $ | | $ | | $ | 104,481 | $ | 150,159 | $ | | $ | | $ | 150,159 | ||||||||||||||||
Imported avocados |
| 81,756 | | 81,756 | | 54,589 | | 54,589 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Papayas |
| 6,251 | | 6,251 | | 6,846 | | 6,846 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialities and tropicals |
| 13,777 | | 13,777 | | 14,233 | | 14,233 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Processed food service |
| | 28,307 | 28,307 | | | 27,352 | 27,352 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Processed retail and club |
| | 6,766 | 6,766 | | | 4,285 | 4,285 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total fruit and product sales
to third-parties |
104,481 | 101,784 | 35,073 | 241,338 | 150,159 | 75,668 | 31,637 | 257,464 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Freight and other charges |
7,699 | 16,430 | 258 | 24,387 | 11,946 | 10,968 | 534 | 23,448 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total gross sales to third-parties |
112,180 | 118,214 | 35,331 | 265,725 | 162,105 | 86,636 | 32,171 | 280,912 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less sales incentives |
(103 | ) | (2 | ) | (6,798 | ) | (6,903 | ) | (131 | ) | (48 | ) | (6,515 | ) | (6,694 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total net sales to third-parties |
112,077 | 118,212 | 28,533 | 258,822 | 161,974 | 86,588 | 25,656 | 274,218 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany sales |
4,231 | 11,619 | 6,166 | 22,016 | 1,512 | 7,835 | 7,093 | 16,440 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 116,308 | $ | 129,831 | $ | 34,699 | 280,838 | $ | 163,486 | $ | 94,423 | $ | 32,749 | 290,658 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany sales eliminations |
(22,016 | ) | (16,440 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated net sales |
$ | 258,822 | $ | 274,218 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended October 31, 2004 | Year ended October 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
International | International | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
avocados and | avocados and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
perishable | perishable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
California | food | Processed | California | food | Processed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
avocados | products | products | Total | avocados | products | products | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third-party sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
California avocados |
$ | 150,159 | $ | | $ | | $ | 150,159 | $ | 140,795 | $ | | $ | | $ | 140,795 | ||||||||||||||||
Imported avocados |
| 54,589 | | 54,589 | | 56,306 | | 56,306 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Papayas |
| 6,846 | | 6,846 | | 2,920 | | 2,920 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialities and tropicals |
| 14,233 | | 14,233 | | 30 | | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Processed food service |
| | 27,352 | 27,352 | | | 28,545 | 28,545 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Processed retail and club |
| | 4,285 | 4,285 | | | 5,165 | 5,165 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total fruit and product sales
to third-parties |
150,159 | 75,668 | 31,637 | 257,464 | 140,795 | 59,256 | 33,710 | 233,761 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Freight and other charges |
11,946 | 10,968 | 534 | 23,448 | 8,997 | 10,079 | 290 | 19,366 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total gross sales to third-parties |
162,105 | 86,636 | 32,171 | 280,912 | 149,792 | 69,335 | 34,000 | 253,127 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less sales incentives |
(131 | ) | (48 | ) | (6,515 | ) | (6,694 | ) | (157 | ) | (251 | ) | (5,958 | ) | (6,366 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total net sales to third-parties |
161,974 | 86,588 | 25,656 | 274,218 | 149,635 | 69,084 | 28,042 | 246,761 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany sales |
1,512 | 7,835 | 7,093 | 16,440 | | 6,263 | 4,318 | 10,581 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 163,486 | $ | 94,423 | $ | 32,749 | 290,658 | $ | 149,635 | $ | 75,347 | $ | 32,360 | 257,342 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany sales eliminations |
(16,440 | ) | (10,581 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated net sales |
$ | 274,218 | $ | 246,761 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales to third parties by segment exclude value-added services billed by our Uruapan
packinghouse, Uruapan processing plant and Mexicali processing plant to the parent company. All
intercompany sales are eliminated in our consolidated results of operations.
California Avocados
Net sales delivered by the business decreased by approximately $49.9 million, or 30.8%, from
fiscal 2004 to 2005. The decrease in sales primarily reflects a 31.3% decrease in pounds of
avocados sold, partially offset by an increase in our average selling prices when compared to the
same prior period. This decrease in pounds sold is consistent with the expected decrease in the
overall harvest of the California avocado crop for the 2004/2005 season. Our market share of
California avocados remained consistent at 34.4% for the year ended October 31, 2005, compared to
34.7% for the same period in the prior year. Based on estimates generated from the California
Avocado Commission, we expect the California avocado crop for the 2005/2006 season to be
substantially larger than the 2004/2005 crop.
For fiscal year 2005, average selling prices, on a per carton basis, for California avocados
were 6.7% higher when compared to the same prior year period. This pricing structure primarily
reflects the impact of a smaller California avocado harvest, partially offset by an increase in
foreign-sourced fruit in the U.S. marketplace. For fiscal year 2006, we believe that the
anticipated increase of avocados in the U.S. marketplace, primarily related to an expected larger
California avocado crop discussed above, will put increasing pressure on sales prices.
Net sales delivered by the business increased by approximately $12.3 million, or 8.2%, from
fiscal 2003 to 2004. This increase in sales reflects a 24.2% increase in pounds of avocados sold,
partially offset by a decrease in our average selling prices when compared to the same prior year
period. This increase in pounds sold was consistent with the increase in the overall harvest of
the California
19
Table of Contents
avocado crop for the 2003/2004 season. Our market share of California avocados remained
consistent at 34.7% for fiscal year 2004, compared to 34.2% for the same period in the prior year.
For fiscal year 2004, average selling prices, on a per carton basis, for California avocados
were 18.0% lower when compared to the same prior year period. This pricing structure primarily
reflects the impact of a larger California avocado harvest.
In October 2002, the USDA announced the creation of a Hass Avocado Board to promote the sale
of Hass variety avocados in the U.S. marketplace. This board provides a basis for a unified
funding of promotional activities based on an assessment on all avocados sold in the U.S.
marketplace, including imported and California grown fruit. The California Avocado Commission,
which receives its funding from California avocado growers, has historically shouldered the
promotional and advertising costs supporting avocado sales. We believe that the incremental
funding of promotional and advertising programs in the U.S. will, in the long term, positively
impact average selling prices and will favorably impact our California avocado and international
avocado businesses. During fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, we remitted approximately $2.4 million,
$3.3 million and $2.4 million to the Hass Avocado Board representing our share of such marketing
expenses.
International and Perishable Food Products
For fiscal year 2005, when compared to the same period in the prior year, sales to third-party
customers increased by approximately $31.6 million, or 36.5%, from $86.6 million to $118.2 million.
The increased sales to third-parties by our international and perishable food products business
were primarily driven by the additional sales related to Mexican and Chilean grown avocados in the
U.S., Japanese, and/or European marketplace. These increases, however, were partially offset by
decreased sales of Dominican Republic grown avocados. While we believe that sales of Mexican grown
avocados will continue to show a growing trend, we do not expect a trend as strong as we
experienced in fiscal 2005, which was primarily related to the aforementioned USDA rule allowing
Hass avocado imports from Mexico into 50 states year round (subject to certain restrictionssee
comment above). We intend to leverage our position as the largest packer of Mexican grown avocados
for export markets to improve the overall performance of this business.
Sales of Mexican and Chilean sourced fruit increased $24.7 million and $6.1 million for fiscal
year 2005, when compared to the same prior year period, primarily as a result of a 62.8% and 65.7%
increase in pounds of Mexican and Chilean fruit handled. Such increases, however, were partially
offset by decreases in Dominican Republic fruit sales. For fiscal year 2005, sales of Dominican
Republic sourced fruit decreased $4.3 million when compared to the same prior period. This was
primarily the result of a 52.4% decrease in the volume of Dominican Republic fruit handled, when
compared to the same prior year period. Pricing during fiscal year 2005 was stable when compared
to fiscal 2004.
For fiscal year 2004, when compared to the same period in the prior year, sales to third-party
customers increased by approximately $17.5 million, or 25.3%, from $69.1 million to $86.6 million.
The increased sales to third-parties by our international and perishable food products business
were primarily driven by the additional sales related to the acquisition of Maui in November 2003,
as well as increased sales of Mexican and Dominican Republic grown avocados in the U.S., Japanese,
and/or European marketplace. These increases, however, were partially offset by decreased sales of
Chilean grown avocados.
For fiscal year 2004, the additional sales related to the acquisition of Maui totaled
approximately $19.8 million (approximately $1.5 million of such sales were related to California
avocados). Also, sales of Mexican and Dominican Republic sourced fruit increased $4.1 million and
$6.9 million for fiscal year 2004, when compared to the same prior year period, primarily as a
result of a 9.8% and 100% increase in pounds of Mexican and Dominican Republic fruit handled. Such
increases, however, were partially offset by decreases in Chilean fruit sales. For fiscal year
2004, sales of Chilean sourced fruit decreased $12.3 million when compared to the same prior
period. This was primarily the result of a 42.1% decrease in the volume of Chilean fruit handled,
when compared to the same prior year period. Pricing during fiscal year 2004 was fairly stable as
well, when compared to fiscal 2003.
Processed Products
Net sales to third-party customers increased by approximately $2.9 million, or 11.2%, from
$25.7 million for fiscal year 2004 to $28.5 million for fiscal year 2005. The increase in net
sales to third-party customers is primarily attributable to an increase of 2.3 million pounds of
product sold, or 17.4%, net of a decrease in sales incentives and promotions paid, totaling $0.07
per pound of product sold, or 14.3%. Such increase, however, was partially offset by a decrease in
the sales price per product pound sold of $0.09, or 4.7%. During fiscal year 2005, the increase in
pounds sold primarily relates to an increase in the sale of our high-pressure guacamole product,
which increased 56.2% when compared to the same prior year period. The decrease in our average
selling price and sales incentives and promotional activities paid primarily relates to a change in
our product mix.
20
Table of Contents
Net sales to third-party customers decreased by approximately $2.3 million, or 8.5%, from
$28.0 million for fiscal year 2003 to $25.7 million for fiscal year 2004. The decrease in net
sales to third-party customers is primarily attributable to a decrease in 1.4 million pounds of
product sold, or 9.5%, and an increase in sales incentives and promotional activities paid of $0.6
million, or 8.5%, partially offset by an increase in the sales price per product pound sold of
$0.09, or 3.9%. During fiscal year 2004, the decrease in pounds sold primarily relates to a lack
of inventory to meet customer demand. Such lack of inventory was primarily related to reduced
production capabilities during construction of our new processed facility. As a result, and, in
order to maintain good customer relationships, we increased our sales incentives and promotional
activities paid.
During fiscal year 2005, we operated one high-pressure line designed to manufacture processed
avocado products that are not frozen (guacamole) in Uruapan. This machine ran at about 60%
capacity (with one shift) through October 2005. We anticipate that we will operate such
high-pressure machine at a higher capacity during fiscal year 2006. We presently own another, much
smaller, high-pressure machine, located in Uruapan, that is currently not in use. We are
considering various alternatives with such machine, including trading such machine in for credit
towards another high-pressure machine with similar capacity as our high-pressure machine that is
currently in use in Uruapan. Utilizing avocado pulp and chunks, these high-pressure machines allow
us to deliver fresh guacamole to retail and food service customers. Sales of our high-pressure
product totaled approximately $8.7 million and $5.5 million for fiscal years 2005 and 2004.
Gross Margins
The following table summarizes our gross margins and gross profit percentages by business
segment:
2005 | Change | 2004 | Change | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Margins: |
||||||||||||||||||||
California avocados |
$ | 10,502 | (38.6 | )% | $ | 17,102 | 15.0 | % | $ | 14,873 | ||||||||||
International avocados and perishable food products |
6,569 | 32.5 | % | 4,958 | (9.1 | )% | 5,457 | |||||||||||||
Processed products |
4,663 | 39.4 | % | 3,344 | (33.3 | )% | 5,017 | |||||||||||||
Total gross margins |
$ | 21,734 | (14.4 | )% | $ | 25,404 | 0.2 | % | $ | 25,347 | ||||||||||
Gross profit percentages: |
||||||||||||||||||||
California avocados |
9.4 | % | 10.6 | % | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
International avocados and perishable food products |
5.6 | % | 5.7 | % | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Processed products |
16.3 | % | 13.0 | % | 17.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
8.4 | % | 9.3 | % | 10.3 | % |
____________
Our cost of goods sold consists predominantly of fruit costs, packing materials, freight and
handling, labor and overhead (including depreciation) associated with preparing food products, and
other direct expenses pertaining to products sold. Consolidated gross margin, as a percent of
sales, decreased 0.9% for fiscal year 2005 when compared to fiscal year 2004. This decrease was
principally attributable to decreased profitability in our California avocado segment, partially
offset by increased profitability in our international avocados and perishable food products and
our processed product operating segments. Consolidated gross margin, as a percent of sales,
decreased 1.0% for fiscal year 2004 when compared to fiscal year 2003. This decrease was
principally attributable to decreased profitability in our international avocados and perishable
food products operating segment and our processed product segment, partially offset by increased
profitability in our California avocado segment.
Gross margins and gross profit percentages for our California avocado business are largely
dependent on production yields achieved at our packinghouses, current market prices of avocados,
and the volume of avocados packed. The decrease in our gross margin percentage during fiscal year
2005 was primarily related to a significant decrease in pounds of fruit sold. During fiscal year
2005, when compared to fiscal year 2004, we experienced a 31.3% decrease in pounds of avocados
sold. This had the effect of increasing our per pound costs, which, as a result, negatively
impacted gross margins. Such higher per pound cost was partially offset, however, by an increase
in our packing and marketing fee (which is charged to cover our costs and a profit).
The increase in our gross margin percentage during fiscal year 2004 was primarily related to a
significant increase in pounds of fruit handled. During fiscal year 2004, when compared to fiscal
year 2003, fruit handled by our California packinghouses increased approximately 31.4%. This had
the effect of reducing our per pound costs, which, as a result, positively impacted gross margins.
During fiscal 2005, freight and handling costs decreased by approximately $1.9 million, from
$5.0 million in fiscal 2004 to $3.1 million during fiscal 2005, primarily related to volume
fluctuations. During fiscal 2004, freight and handling costs increased by approximately $1.5
million, from $3.5 million in fiscal 2003 to $5.0 million during fiscal 2004. We continue to
review our packinghouse processes for potential improvements in packing efficiencies and more
favorable production yields.
21
Table of Contents
The gross margin and gross profit percentage for our international avocado and perishable food
products business are dependent on the volume of fruit we handle and the competitiveness of the
returns that we provide to third-party domestic packers. For example, the gross margins we earn on
avocados procured from Chile and the Dominican Republic, as well as papayas grown in Hawaii, are
generally based on a commission agreed to with each packer that is subject to incentive provisions.
These provisions provide for us to deliver returns to these packers that are competitive with
those delivered by other handlers. Accordingly, the gross margin results for this business are a
function of the volume handled and the competitiveness of the sales prices that we realize as
compared to others. Although we generally do not take legal title to such avocados and perishable
products, we do assume responsibilities (principally assuming credit risk, inventory loss and
delivery risk, and limited pricing risk) that are consistent with acting as a principal in the
transaction. Accordingly, our results of operations include sales and cost of sales from the sale
of avocados and perishable products procured under consignment arrangements. For fiscal year 2005,
we generated gross margins of $1.4 million from the sale of fresh produce products that were packed
by third parties, whereas gross margins for fiscal year 2004 were $1.5 million. For fiscal year
2004, we generated gross margins of $1.5 million from the sale of fresh produce products that were
packed by third parties, whereas gross margins for fiscal year 2003 were $2.3 million.
Our business with Mexican growers differs in that we operate a packinghouse in Mexico and
purchase avocados directly from the field. Consequently, the gross margin and gross profit
percentages generated by our Mexican operations are significantly impacted by the volume of
avocados handled by our packinghouse and the cost of the fruit. During fiscal year 2005, our gross
margins generated from the sale of Mexican avocados increased from approximately $1.5 million in
fiscal year 2004 to $3.8 million in fiscal year 2005. We did not experience a significant
fluctuation in our gross margin percentage for fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004 related to
our Mexican operations. During fiscal year 2004, our gross margins, and related gross margin
percentages, generated from the sale of Mexican avocados deteriorated from approximately $2.2
million in fiscal year 2003 to $1.5 million in fiscal year 2004, principally as a result of an
increase in fruit costs. This increase in fruit costs had the effect of increasing our per pound
costs, which, as a result, adversely affected gross margins. Further, we experienced an increase
in sales of non-exported fruit, which typically generate lower margins then exported fruit. These
decreases, however, were partially offset by increases in fruit volume during fiscal year 2004,
which had the effect of reducing our per pound costs.
Gross margins and gross profit percentages for our processed products business are largely
dependent on the pricing of our final product and the cost of avocados used in preparing guacamole.
During fiscal year 2005, the processed products gross profit percentages increased primarily as a
result of efficiencies related to the relocation of production from Santa Paula, California and
Mexicali, Mexico to our newly acquired facility in Uruapan, Mexico. Such efficiencies include the
elimination of duplicative overhead, as well as lower production costs. Additionally, our
processed product segment experienced lower fruit costs. Such improvements, however, were
partially offset by an increase in the sale of products that generate a lower gross margin then
those sold in the prior year. During fiscal year 2004, the processed products gross profit
percentages decreased primarily as a result of inefficiencies experienced in the start-up process
of our newly constructed facility in Uruapan, Mexico and the winding down of the operations at our
Mexicali, Mexico facility. Such inefficiencies primarily relate to subcontracting costs and
duplicative overhead costs. Additionally, our processed product segment experienced higher fruit
costs, as well as an increase in the sale of products that generate a lower gross margin then those
sold in the prior year. We anticipate that the gross profit percentage for our processed product
segment will continue to experience fluctuations primarily due to the uncertainty of fruit costs
that will be used in the production process.
Selling, General and Administrative
2005 | Change | 2004 | Change | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 18,588 | 16.8 | % | $ | 15,920 | 8.7 | % | $ | 14,651 | ||||||||||
Percentage of net sales |
7.2 | % | 5.8 | % | 5.9 | % |
____________
Selling, general and administrative expenses include costs of marketing and advertising, sales
expenses, and other general and administrative costs. For fiscal year 2005, selling, general and
administrative expenses increased by $2.7 million, or 16.8%, compared to the same period for fiscal
2004. This increase was primarily related to higher corporate costs, including, but not limited
to, costs related to implementing provisions required under section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
(totaling approximately $2.2 million), an increase in bad debt expense (totaling approximately $0.5
million), and corporate moving expenses (totaling approximately $0.4 million). Such higher
corporate costs were partially offset by a decrease in employee compensation costs (totaling
approximately $0.7 million).
For fiscal year 2004, selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.3 million,
or 8.7%, compared to fiscal year 2003. The increased general and administrative costs related
principally to selling, general and administrative expenses incurred by Maui. Mauis selling,
general and administrative expenses totaled approximately $0.7 million for fiscal year 2004.
Additionally, we also experienced higher costs of corporate functions, such as accounting,
information systems, and human resources (totaling
22
Table of Contents
approximately $0.8 million). These increased costs were partially offset by reduced employee
compensation expenses of approximately $0.5 million, which was primarily related to a reduction in
bonuses during fiscal year 2004 as compared to fiscal year 2003.
Other Income, Net
2005 | Change | 2004 | Change | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
$ | 2,357 | 393.1 | % | $ | 478 | (46.2 | )% | $ | 889 | ||||||||||
Percentage of net sales |
0.9 | % | 0.2 | % | 0.4 | % |
____________
Other income, net includes interest income and expense generated primarily in connection with
our financing activities, as well as certain other transactions that are outside of the course of
normal operations. During fiscal year 2005, other income, net includes the gain on the sale of our
corporate facility totaling approximately $1.7 million. During fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003,
other income, net includes interest accrued on notes receivable from directors and officers of
approximately $0.2 million, $0.2 million and $0.3 million.
Provision for Income Taxes
2005 | Change | 2004 | Change | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 2,181 | (38.9 | )% | $ | 3,567 | (17.4 | )% | $ | 4,319 | ||||||||||
Percentage of income before
provision for income taxes |
39.6 | % | 36.5 | % | 37.6 | % |
____________
The effective income tax rate for fiscal year 2005 and 2004 is higher than the federal
statutory rate principally due to state taxes. Our effective income tax rate increased from 36.5%
in fiscal year 2004 to 39.6% in fiscal year 2005 primarily as a result of an unfavorable increase
in our foreign tax rates during fiscal year 2005 when compared to fiscal year 2004. Our effective
income tax rate decreased from 37.6% in fiscal year 2003 to 36.5% in fiscal year 2004 primarily as
a result of a favorable reduction in our foreign tax rates during fiscal year 2004 when compared to
fiscal year 2003.
23
Table of Contents
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table presents our operating results for each of the eight fiscal quarters in
the period ended October 31, 2005. The information for each of these quarters is derived from our
unaudited interim financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. In our opinion, all necessary
adjustments, which consist only of normal and recurring accruals, have been included to fairly
present our unaudited quarterly results.
Three months ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oct. 31, | July 31, | Apr. 30, | Jan. 31, | Oct. 31, | July 31, | Apr. 30, | Jan. 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2005 | 2004 | 2004 | 2004 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 62,246 | $ | 88,699 | $ | 60,206 | $ | 47,671 | $ | 65,436 | $ | 83,318 | $ | 76,421 | $ | 49,043 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
58,013 | 79,505 | 53,851 | 45,719 | 59,425 | 74,833 | 68,625 | 45,931 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
4,233 | 9,194 | 6,355 | 1,952 | 6,011 | 8,485 | 7,796 | 3,112 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
4,943 | 4,825 | 4,307 | 4,513 | 4,416 | 3,777 | 4,012 | 3,715 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charge |
185 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(710 | ) | 4,369 | 2,048 | (2,561 | ) | 1,410 | 4,708 | 3,784 | (603 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
213 | 153 | 1,909 | 82 | 167 | 91 | 106 | 114 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before provision (benefit)
for income taxes |
(497 | ) | 4,522 | 3,957 | (2,479 | ) | 1,577 | 4,799 | 3,890 | (489 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
20 | 1,603 | 1,490 | (932 | ) | 467 | 1,739 | 1,556 | (195 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (517 | ) | $ | 2,919 | $ | 2,467 | $ | (1,547 | ) | $ | 1,110 | $ | 3,060 | $ | 2,334 | $ | (294 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.18 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.18 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||||||
Number of shares used in per share
computation: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
14,371 | 14,171 | 13,507 | 13,507 | 13,507 | 13,507 | 13,507 | 13,469 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
14,432 | 14,237 | 13,580 | 13,507 | 13,591 | 13,594 | 13,589 | 13,469 |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating
activities for fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003 provided cash flows of $5.6 million, $4.5
million, and $15.2 million. Fiscal year 2005 operating cash flows reflect our net income of $3.3
million, net noncash charges (depreciation and amortization, gains, losses, and stock compensation
expense) of $1.8 million and a net increase in the non-cash components of our working capital of
approximately $0.5 million.
Fiscal year 2005 increases in operating cash flows, caused by working capital changes, include
a increase in trade accounts payable and accrued expenses of $3.2 million, an decrease in accounts
receivable of $1.4 million, an decrease in inventory of $1.3 million, and an increase in advance to
suppliers of $1.3 million, partially offset by a net decrease in payable to growers of $4.0
million, a net decrease in deferred income taxes of $1.9 million, and an increase in prepaid
expenses and other assets of $0.8 million.
Decreases in our accounts receivable balance as of October 31, 2005, when compared to October
31, 2004, primarily reflect a significantly lower volume of California avocado sales recorded in
the month of October 2005, as compared to October 2004, partially offset by additional
international avocados and perishable food product sales for the same period. Similarly, the
amounts payable to our growers also reflects the decrease in the volume of California avocados
marketed in the month of October 2005, as compared to October 2004. These volume level
fluctuations are consistent with the harvests experienced in previous years. Additionally,
decreases in our inventory balance as of October 31, 2005, when compared to October 31, 2004,
primarily reflect a significant decrease in the manufacture of finished, non-high-pressure
processed products. Such decrease was primarily related to higher fruit-prices near our fiscal
year end, as well as a shift in manufacturing to our high-pressure products. Due to the high
turnover rate of our high-pressure products, we do not accumulate such inventory on a basis
consistent with that of other products.
Decreases in advances to suppliers as of October 31, 2005, when compared to October 31, 2004,
primarily relates to an earlier start of the Chilean avocado harvest, which resulted in quicker
collections on our advances. Increases in our trade accounts payable and accrued expenses as of
October 31, 2005, when compared to October 31, 2004, primarily reflect additional accrual of
expenses related to implementing certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as accruals
related to purchased fruit. The increase in prepaid expenses and other assets as of October 31,
2005, when compared to October 31, 2004, was primarily a result of additional miscellaneous
receivables as of our fiscal year end.
Cash
used in investing activities was $11.9 million, $8.5 million, and $4.5 million for fiscal
years 2005, 2004, and 2003. Fiscal year 2005 cash flows used in investing activities include the
acquisition of Limoneira common stock, net of our common stock
issued, totaling $13.5 million and capital expenditures of $1.9 million,
principally related to the construction of coolers for our ProRipeVIP avocado ripening program,
partially offset by the proceeds related to the sale of our corporate facility located in Santa
Ana, California totaling $3.4 million.
24
Table of Contents
Cash provided by financing activities was $6.9 million for fiscal year 2005, while cash used
in financing activities was $0.7 million, and $6.3 million for fiscal years 2004 and 2003. Cash
provided during fiscal year 2005 primarily includes proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt to
finance our purchase of Limoneira common stock, totaling $13.0 million. Such proceeds
were partially offset, however, by the payment of a dividend totaling $4.1 million, as well as a
$2.0 million payment to retire 200,000 shares of our common stock.
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash reserves, cash generated from
operations and amounts available for borrowing under our existing credit facilities. Cash and cash
equivalents as of October 31, 2005 and 2004 totaled $1.1 million and $0.6 million. Our working
capital at October 31, 2005 was $17.6 million compared to $20.4 million at October 31, 2004. The
overall working capital decrease primarily reflects additional debt related to our Limoneira common
stock purchase and additional accrued expenses, partially offset by a decrease in payable to
growers and trade accounts payable.
We believe that cash flows from operations and available credit facilities will be sufficient
to satisfy our future capital expenditures, grower recruitment efforts, working capital and other
financing requirements. We will continue to evaluate grower recruitment opportunities and
exclusivity arrangements with food service companies to fuel growth in each of our business
segments. During calendar year 2005, we renewed our two short-term, non-collateralized, revolving
credit facilities. These credit facilities expire in February 2007 and April 2008 and are with
separate banks. Under the terms of these agreements, we are advanced funds for working capital
purposes. Total credit available under the combined short-term borrowing agreements was $24
million, with a weighted-average interest rate of 4.8% and 2.9% at October 31, 2005 and 2004.
Under these credit facilities, we had $1.4 million and $2.0 million outstanding as of October 31,
2005 and 2004. The credit facilities contain various financial covenants with which we were in
compliance at October 31, 2005. The most significant financial covenants relate to working
capital, tangible net worth (as defined), and Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and
Amortization (EBITDA) (as defined) requirements.
The following table summarizes contractual obligations pursuant to which we are required to make
cash payments. The information is presented as of our fiscal year ended October 31, 2005:
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 4-5 years | More than 5 years | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations
(including interest) |
$ | 13,782 | $ | 1,388 | $ | 4,149 | $ | 2,748 | $ | 5,497 | ||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
1,424 | 1,424 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Defined benefit plan |
510 | 55 | 165 | 110 | 180 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease commitments |
3,706 | 1,068 | 1,550 | 414 | 674 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 19,422 | $ | 3,935 | $ | 5,864 | $ | 3,272 | $ | 6,351 | ||||||||||
The California avocado industry is subject to a state marketing order whereby handlers
are required to collect assessments from the growers and remit such assessments to the California
Avocado Commission (CAC). The assessments are primarily for advertising and promotions. The
amount of the assessment is based on the dollars paid to the growers for their fruit, and, as a
result, is not determinable until the value of the payments to the growers has been calculated.
We did not have any significant commitments for capital expenditures as of October 31, 2005.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
25
Table of Contents
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes
receivable from shareholders, payable to growers, accounts payable, current borrowings pursuant to
our credit facilities with financial institutions, and long-term, fixed-rate obligations. All of
our financial instruments are entered into during the normal course of operations and have not been
acquired for trading purposes. The table below summarizes interest rate sensitive financial
instruments and presents principal cash flows in U.S. dollars, which is our reporting currency, and
weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates, as of October 31, 2005.
Expected maturity date October 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(All amounts in thousands) | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | Thereafter | Total | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents (1) |
$ | 1,133 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,133 | $ | 1,133 | ||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable (1) |
19,253 | | | | | | 19,253 | 19,253 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes receivable from shareholders (2) |
175 | 2,461 | | | | | 2,636 | 2,529 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payable to growers (1) |
$ | 1,753 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,753 | $ | 1,753 | ||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable (1) |
1,892 | | | | | | 1,892 | 1,892 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current borrowings pursuant to credit
facilities (1) |
1,424 | | | | | | 1,424 | 1,424 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed-rate long-term obligations (3) |
1,313 | 1,309 | 1,308 | 1,302 | 1,300 | 6,500 | 13,032 | 13,032 |
(1) | We believe the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, payable to growers, accounts payable, and current borrowings pursuant to credit facilities approximate their fair value due to the short maturity of these financial instruments. |
(2) | Notes receivable from shareholders bear interest at 7.0%. We believe that a portfolio of loans with a similar risk profile would currently yield a return of 9.25%. We project the impact of an increase or decrease in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in a change of fair value of approximately $46,000. |
(3) | Fixed-rate long-term obligations bear interest rates ranging from 3.3% to 8.2% with a weighted-average interest rate of 6.5%. We believe that loans with a similar risk profile would currently yield a return of 6.5%. We project the impact of an increase or decrease in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in a change of fair value of approximately $534,000. |
We were not a party to any derivative instruments during the fiscal year. It is currently
our intent not to use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Additionally, we
do not use any hedging or forward contracts to offset market volatility.
Our Mexican-based operations transact business in Mexican pesos. Funds are transferred by our
corporate office to Mexico on a weekly basis to satisfy domestic cash needs. Consequently, the spot
rate for the Mexican peso has a moderate impact on our operating results. However, we do not
believe that this impact is sufficient to warrant the use of derivative instruments to hedge the
fluctuation in the Mexican peso. Total foreign currency gains and losses for each of the three
years in the period ended October 31, 2005 do not exceed $0.1 million.
26
Table of Contents
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share amounts)
October 31, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,133 | $ | 636 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
of $2,688 (2005) and $1,087 (2004) |
19,253 | 21,131 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
10,096 | 11,375 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
5,879 | 4,807 | ||||||
Advances to suppliers |
1,141 | 2,413 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
893 | 803 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,651 | 1,775 | ||||||
Total current assets |
41,046 | 42,940 | ||||||
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
16,897 | 17,427 | ||||||
Building held for sale |
| 1,658 | ||||||
Investment in Limoneira |
45,634 | | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,591 | 3,591 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,314 | 1,782 | ||||||
$ | 108,482 | $ | 67,398 | |||||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Payable to growers |
$ | 1,753 | $ | 5,789 | ||||
Trade accounts payable |
1,892 | 2,490 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
12,482 | 8,234 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings |
1,424 | 2,000 | ||||||
Dividend payable |
4,564 | 4,052 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term obligations |
1,313 | 22 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
23,428 | 22,587 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities: |
||||||||
Long-term obligations, less current portion |
11,719 | 34 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
8,589 | 840 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities |
20,308 | 874 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock ($0.001 par value, 100,000 shares
authorized; 14,362 and 13,507 shares outstanding
at October 31, 2005 and 2004) |
14 | 14 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
37,240 | 28,822 | ||||||
Notes receivable from shareholders |
(2,636 | ) | (2,883 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
13,386 | | ||||||
Retained earnings |
16,742 | 17,984 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
64,746 | 43,937 | ||||||
$ | 108,482 | $ | 67,398 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
27
Table of Contents
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 258,822 | $ | 274,218 | $ | 246,761 | ||||||
Cost of sales |
237,088 | 248,814 | 221,414 | |||||||||
Gross margin |
21,734 | 25,404 | 25,347 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
18,588 | 15,920 | 14,651 | |||||||||
Restructuring charge |
| 185 | 106 | |||||||||
Operating income |
3,146 | 9,299 | 10,590 | |||||||||
Other income, net |
2,357 | 478 | 889 | |||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
5,503 | 9,777 | 11,479 | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
2,181 | 3,567 | 4,319 | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,322 | $ | 6,210 | $ | 7,160 | ||||||
Net income per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.55 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.55 | ||||||
Number of shares used in per share computation: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
13,892 | 13,497 | 12,911 | |||||||||
Diluted |
13,985 | 13,582 | 12,944 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
28
Table of Contents
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(All amounts in thousands)
Year ended | ||||||||||||
October 31, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,322 | $ | 6,210 | $ | 7,160 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income, before tax: |
||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gains arising during period |
22,184 | | | |||||||||
Income tax expense related to items of other
comprehensive income |
(8,798 | ) | | | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
13,386 | | | |||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 16,708 | $ | 6,210 | $ | 7,160 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
29
Table of Contents
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
Notes | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Receivable | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-in | From | Comprehensive | Retained | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Shareholders | Income | Earnings | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, October 31, 2002 |
12,835 | $ | 13 | $ | 24,221 | $ | (5,720 | ) | $ | | $ | 12,042 | $ | 30,556 | ||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options and
income tax benefit of $72 |
95 | | 547 | | | | 547 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Collections on shareholder notes receivable |
| | | 2,157 | | | 2,157 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Additional costs related to Rights Offering |
| | (41 | ) | | | | (41 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Dividend declared to shareholders |
| | | | | (3,232 | ) | (3,232 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 7,160 | 7,160 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, October 31, 2003 |
12,930 | 13 | 24,727 | (3,563 | ) | | 15,970 | 37,147 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase acquisition |
577 | 1 | 4,049 | | | | 4,050 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
| | 46 | | | | 46 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Collections on shareholder notes receivable |
| | | 680 | | | 680 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend declared to shareholders |
| | | | | (4,196 | ) | (4,196 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 6,210 | 6,210 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, October 31, 2004 |
13,507 | 14 | 28,822 | (2,883 | ) | | 17,984 | 43,937 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options and
income tax benefit of $59 |
55 | | 334 | | | | 334 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
| | 84 | | | | 84 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock to Limoneira |
1,000 | 1 | 9,999 | | | | 10,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on Limoneira investment |
| | | | 13,386 | | 13,386 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of common stock |
(200 | ) | (1 | ) | (1,999 | ) | | | | (2,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Collections on shareholder notes receivable |
| | | 247 | | | 247 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend declared to shareholders |
| | | | | (4,564 | ) | (4,564 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 3,322 | 3,322 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, October 31, 2005 |
14,362 | $ | 14 | $ | 37,240 | $ | (2,636 | ) | $ | 13,386 | $ | 16,742 | $ | 64,746 | ||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
30
Table of Contents
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,322 | $ | 6,210 | $ | 7,160 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,862 | 2,648 | 2,024 | |||||||||
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
475 | 25 | 19 | |||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
84 | 46 | | |||||||||
(Gain)/loss on disposal of property, plant, and equipment |
(1,668 | ) | | 32 | ||||||||
Gain on sale of investments held to maturity |
| | (163 | ) | ||||||||
Effect on cash of changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
1,403 | (4,596 | ) | 1,328 | ||||||||
Inventories, net |
1,279 | (3,354 | ) | 4,440 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(723 | ) | 2,798 | 620 | ||||||||
Advances to suppliers |
1,272 | (1,789 | ) | 1,911 | ||||||||
Income taxes receivable |
(31 | ) | (803 | ) | 360 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(1,925 | ) | (320 | ) | (226 | ) | ||||||
Payable to growers |
(4,036 | ) | 2,343 | (2,922 | ) | |||||||
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses |
3,254 | 1,303 | 588 | |||||||||
Income tax payable |
| (51 | ) | 51 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
5,568 | 4,460 | 15,222 | |||||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of investments held to maturity |
| | 2,060 | |||||||||
Direct costs of acquisition of Maui Fresh International, Inc. |
| (65 | ) | | ||||||||
Acquisitions of property, plant, and equipment |
(1,874 | ) | (8,409 | ) | (6,535 | ) | ||||||
Cash settlement of the acquisition of Limoneira stock, net of our common stock issued |
(13,450 | ) | | | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of building |
3,383 | | | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
| | 2,223 | |||||||||
Purchases of short-term investments |
| | (2,223 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(11,941 | ) | (8,474 | ) | (4,475 | ) | ||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
||||||||||||
Dividend paid to shareholders |
(4,052 | ) | (3,376 | ) | (2,567 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from (repayments of) short-term borrowings, net |
(576 | ) | 2,000 | (3,000 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
13,000 | | | |||||||||
Payments on long-term obligations |
(24 | ) | (29 | ) | (3,317 | ) | ||||||
Retirement of common stock |
(2,000 | ) | | | ||||||||
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
275 | | 475 | |||||||||
Proceeds from collection of shareholder notes receivable |
247 | 680 | 2,157 | |||||||||
Additional rights offering costs |
| | (41 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash
provided by (used in) financing activities |
6,870 | (725 | ) | (6,293 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
497 | (4,739 | ) | 4,454 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
636 | 5,375 | 921 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
$ | 1,133 | $ | 636 | $ | 5,375 | ||||||
Supplemental Information - |
||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year for: |
||||||||||||
Interest |
$ | 399 | $ | 66 | $ | 179 | ||||||
Income taxes |
$ | 3,875 | $ | 4,899 | $ | 4,170 | ||||||
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities: |
||||||||||||
Tax receivable increase related to stock option exercise |
$ | 59 | $ | | $ | 72 | ||||||
Declared dividends payable |
$ | 4,564 | $ | 4,052 | $ | 3,232 | ||||||
Issuance of
our common stock in Limoneira transaction |
$ | 10,000 | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Construction
in progress included in trade accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 396 | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Unrealized holding gains |
$ | 22,184 | $ | | $ | | ||||||
In November 2003, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common shares of Maui Fresh
International, Inc. for 576,924 shares of the Companys common stock, valued at $4.05 million, plus
acquisition costs of $65,000. See Note 1 for further explanation. The following table summarizes
the estimated fair values of the non-cash assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of
acquisition.
(in thousands) | 2004 | |||
Fixed assets |
$ | 114 | ||
Goodwill |
3,526 | |||
Intangible assets |
867 | |||
Total non-cash assets acquired |
4,507 | |||
Current liabilities |
110 | |||
Deferred tax liabilities assumed |
347 | |||
Net non-cash assets acquired |
$ | 4,050 | ||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
31
Table of Contents
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Description of the business
Business
Calavo Growers, Inc. (Calavo, the Company, we, us or our) procures and markets avocados and
other perishable commodities and prepares and distributes processed avocado products. Our
expertise in marketing and distributing avocados, processed avocados, and other perishable foods
allows us to deliver a wide array of fresh and processed food products to food distributors,
produce wholesalers, supermarkets, and restaurants on a worldwide basis. Through our three
operating facilities in southern California and two facilities in Mexico, we sort, pack and/or
ripen avocados procured in California and Mexico and prepare processed avocado products.
Additionally, we procure avocados internationally, principally from Mexico, Chile, and the
Dominican Republic, and distribute other perishable foods, such as Hawaiian grown papayas. We
report these operations in three different business segments: (1) California avocados, (2)
international avocados and perishable food products and (3) processed products.
In order to diversify our product lines and increase synergies within the marketplace, we
acquired all the outstanding common shares of Maui Fresh International, Inc. (Maui) for 576,924
shares of our common stock valued at $4.05 million in November 2003, plus acquisition costs of
$65,000. Maui is a specialty produce company servicing a wide array of retail, food service, and
terminal market wholesale customers with over 20 different specialty commodities. The value of our
common stock issued in conjunction with the acquisition was based on the average quoted market
price of our common stock for three days before and after the announcement date.
2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Calavo Growers, Inc. and our
wholly owned subsidiaries, Calavo Foods, Inc.; Calavo de Mexico S.A. de C.V.; Calavo Foods de
Mexico S.A. de C.V.; and Maui. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid financial instruments purchased with an original maturity date
of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents
approximate their fair values.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed on a weighted-average
basis, which approximates the first-in, first-out method; market is based upon estimated
replacement costs. Costs included in inventory primarily include the following: fruit, picking
and hauling, overhead, labor, materials and freight.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful
lives using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are stated at cost and amortized over
the lesser of their estimated useful lives or the term of the lease, using the straight-line
method. Effective May 1, 2005, based on a review performed by us, we changed our estimate of
useful lives of certain property, plant and equipment. The principal estimated useful lives were:
buildings and improvements 7 to 30 years; leasehold improvements the lesser of the term of the
lease or 7 years; equipment 7 years; information systems hardware and software 3 to 5 years.
The revised estimated useful lives are: buildings and improvements 7 to 50 years; leasehold
improvements the lesser of the term of the lease or 7 years; equipment 7 to 25 years;
information systems hardware and software 3 to 15 years. The change in estimated useful lives
increased our operating income by approximately $0.4 million during the six months ended October
31, 2005 when compared to the old useful lives. Significant renewals and betterments are
capitalized and replaced units are written off. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense.
We capitalize software development costs for internal use in accordance with Statement of
Position 98-1, Accounting for Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use
(SOP 98-1). Capitalization of software development costs begins in the application development
stage and ends when the asset is placed into service. We amortize such costs using the
straight-line basis
32
Table of Contents
over estimated useful lives. Pursuant to SOP 98-1, we capitalized approximately $30,000 and
$254,000 of software development and acquisition costs in 2005 and 2004 relating to systems
supporting our business infrastructure.
Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
The purchase method of accounting for business combinations requires us to make use of
estimates and judgments to allocate the purchase price paid for acquisitions to the fair value of
the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually,
or when a possible impairment is indicated, using the fair value based test prescribed by Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The
impairment test requires us to compare the fair value of business reporting units to carrying
value, including goodwill. We primarily use an income approach (which considers the present
value of future cash flows) in combination with a market approach (which considers what other
purchasers in the marketplace have paid for similar businesses) to determine fair value. Future
cash flows typically include operating cash flows for the business for five years and an estimated
terminal value. Management judgment is required in the estimation of future operating results and
to determine the appropriate terminal values. Future operating results and terminal values could
differ from the estimates and could require a provision for impairment in a future period. We
performed our annual assessment of goodwill and determined that no impairment existed as of October
31, 2005.
Included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are the
following intangible assets: customer-related intangibles of $590,000 (accumulated amortization of
$207,000 at October 31, 2005), brand name intangibles of $275,000 and other identified intangibles
totaling $2,000 (accumulated amortization of $2,000 at October 31, 2005). The customer-related
intangibles and other identified intangibles are being amortized over five and two years. The
intangible asset related to the brand name currently has an indefinite remaining useful life and,
as a result, is not currently subject to amortization. We anticipate recording amortization
expense of approximately $119,000 per annum from fiscal 2006 through fiscal 2008, with the
remaining amortization expense of approximately $26,000 recorded in fiscal 2009.
Long-lived Assets
Long-lived assets, including fixed assets and intangible assets (other than goodwill), are
continually monitored and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of any such asset may not be recoverable. The determination of
recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use
of an asset and its eventual disposition. The estimate of undiscounted cash flows is based upon,
among other things, certain assumptions about future operating performance, growth rates and other
factors. Estimates of undiscounted cash flows may differ from actual cash flows due to, among
other things, technological changes, economic conditions, changes to the business model or changes
in operating performance. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less
then the carrying value, an impairment loss will be recognized, measured as the amount by which the
carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. We have evaluated our long-lived assets and
determined that no impairment existed as of October 31, 2005.
Long-lived assets held for sale are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value
less cost to sell.
Advances to Suppliers
We advance funds to third-party growers primarily in Chile and Mexico for various farming
needs. We continuously evaluate the ability of these growers to repay advances in order to
evaluate the possible need to record an allowance. No such allowance was required at October 31,
2005.
Revenue Recognition
Sales of products and related costs of products sold are recognized when persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, shipment has been made, title passes, the price is fixed or determinable
and collectibility is reasonably assured. Service revenue, including freight, ripening, storage,
bagging and palletization charges, is recorded when services are performed and sales of the related
products are delivered.
Promotional Allowances
We provide for promotional allowances at the time of sale, based on our historical experience.
Our estimates are generally based on evaluating the average length of time between the product
shipment date and the date on which we pay the customer the promotional allowance. The product of
this lag factor and our historical promotional allowance payment rate is the basis for the
promotional allowance included in accrued expenses on our balance sheet. Actual amounts may differ
from these estimates and such differences are recognized as an adjustment to net sales in the
period they are identified.
33
Table of Contents
Allowance for Accounts Receivable
We provide an allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts receivable balances based on
historical experience and the aging of the related accounts receivable.
Consignment Arrangements
We enter into consignment arrangements with avocado growers and packers located outside of the
United States and growers of certain perishable products in the United States. Although we
generally do not take legal title to avocados and perishable products, we do assume
responsibilities (principally assuming credit risk, inventory loss and delivery risk, and limited
pricing risk) that are consistent with acting as a principal in the transaction. Accordingly, the
accompanying financial statements include sales and cost of sales from the sale of avocados and
perishable products procured under consignment arrangements. Amounts recorded for each of the
fiscal years ended October 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 in the financial statements pursuant to
consignment arrangements are as follows (in thousands):
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 32,003 | $ | 26,878 | $ | 33,675 | ||||||
Cost of Sales |
30,298 | 25,985 | 31,900 | |||||||||
Gross Margin |
$ | 1,705 | $ | 893 | $ | 1,775 | ||||||
Advertising Expense
Advertising costs are expensed when incurred. Such costs in fiscal 2005, 2004, and 2003 were
approximately $264,000, $213,000, and $223,000.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Among
the significant estimates affecting the financial statements are those related to valuation
allowances for accounts receivable, goodwill, grower advances, inventories, long-lived assets,
valuation of and estimated useful lives of identifiable intangible assets, promotional allowances
and income taxes. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates based upon currently
available information. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
This statement requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future
consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax
returns. Measurement of the deferred items is based on enacted tax laws. In the event the future
consequences of differences between financial reporting bases and tax bases of our assets and
liabilities result in a deferred tax asset, SFAS No. 109 requires an evaluation of the probability
of being able to realize the future benefits indicated by such asset. A valuation
allowance related to a deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the period without consideration of the dilutive effect of stock options. The
basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding was 13,892,000, 13,497,000, and
12,911,000 for fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated
using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period after
consideration of the dilutive effect of stock options, which were 93,000, 85,000 and 33,000 for
fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003. There were no anti-dilutive options for fiscal years 2005, 2004
and 2003.
34
Table of Contents
Stock-Based Compensation
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, which was amended by
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, the Company
accounts for stock-based compensation under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and related interpretations.
Had stock-based compensation been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for
awards consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Companys pro forma income and pro forma
income per share would have been the amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
Year ended | ||||||||||||
October 31, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Net Income: |
||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 3,322 | $ | 6,210 | $ | 7,160 | ||||||
Add: Total stock-based compensation
expense determined under APB 25 and related
interpretations, net of tax effects |
51 | 28 | | |||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation
expense determined under fair value based
method for all awards, net of tax effects |
(54 | ) | (28 | ) | | |||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 3,319 | $ | 6,210 | $ | 7,160 | ||||||
Net income per share, as reported: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.55 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.55 | ||||||
Net income per share, pro forma: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.55 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.55 |
For purposes of pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123, the estimated fair value of the
options is assumed to be amortized to compensation expense over the options vesting period. The
fair value of the options granted in fiscal year 2005 and 2004 has been estimated at the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes and binomial option pricing model with the following assumptions:
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
4.1 | % | 3.3 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
27.6 | % | 26.9 | % | ||||
Dividend yield |
3.2 | % | 20 | % | ||||
Expected life (years) |
3 | 5 | ||||||
Weighted-average fair value of options granted |
$ | 1.65 | $ | 3.01 |
The Black-Scholes and binomial option valuation models were developed for use in estimating
the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In
addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the
expected stock price volatility. Because options held by our directors and employees have
characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the
subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in our opinion, the
existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of these
options.
In December 2004, the Financial Standards Accounting Board issued SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment. This pronouncement amends SFAS No. 123 and supercedes APB 25. SFAS 123(R) requires that
companies account for awards of equity instruments issued to employees under the fair value method
of accounting and recognize such amounts in the statement of operations. The implementation of
this statement will be effective beginning with the Companys first quarter of fiscal 2006 and will
be adopted using the modified prospective method.
35
Table of Contents
Marketable Securities
We account for marketable securities in accordance with provisions of SFAS No. 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS 115). SFAS 115 addresses the
accounting and reporting for investments in fixed maturity securities and for equity securities
with readily determinable fair values. Our marketable securities consist of our investment in
Limoneira stock (see Note 12). These securities are carried at fair value as determined from
quoted market prices. The estimated fair value, cost, and gross unrealized gain related to such
investment was $45.6 million, $23.45 million and $22.2 million as of October 31, 2005.
Foreign Currency Translation and Remeasurement
Our foreign operations are subject to exchange rate fluctuations and foreign currency
transaction costs. The functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries is the United States
dollar. As a result, monetary assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange
rates as of the balance sheet date and non-monetary assets, liabilities and equity are translated
at historical rates. Sales and expenses are translated using a weighted-average exchange rate for
the period. Gains and losses resulting from those remeasurements are included in income. Gains
and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are also recognized currently in income.
Total foreign currency gains and losses for each of the three years ended October 31, 2005 do not
exceed $0.1 million.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We believe that the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes
receivable from shareholders, accounts payable, and fixed-rate long-term obligations approximates
fair value based on either their short-term nature or on terms currently available to the Company
in financial markets.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We do not presently engage in derivative or hedging activities. In addition, we have reviewed
agreements and contracts and have determined that we have no derivative instruments, nor do any of
our agreements and contracts contain embedded derivative instruments, as of October 31, 2005.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS 151), to clarify that abnormal amounts
of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material (spoilage) should be
recognized as current period charges, and that fixed production overheads should be allocated to
inventory based on normal capacity of production facilities. This statement is effective for the
Companys fiscal year beginning November 1, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of this new
pronouncement to be significant to our results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)). SFAS
123(R) amends FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS 123(R) requires that public
companies account for awards of equity instruments issued to employees under the fair value method
of accounting and recognize such amounts in the statement of operations. The implementation of
this statement will be effective beginning with our first quarter of fiscal 2006. We expect the
impact of this new pronouncement could be significant to our results of operations.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting changes and Error Corrections, which
replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in
Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting
principles and requires retrospective application (a term defined by the statement) to prior
periods financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine the effect of a change. It
also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement that does not include specific
transition provisions. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors
made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. We will adopt SFAS No. 154 as of the
beginning of fiscal 2007 and do not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 154 will have a material
impact on our financial condition of results of operations.
36
Table of Contents
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is defined as all changes in a companys net assets, except changes
resulting from transactions with shareholders. For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, other
comprehensive income includes the unrealized gain on our Limoneira investment totaling $13.4
million, net of income taxes. There was no significant difference between comprehensive income and
net income for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2004 and 2003.
Reclassifications
Certain items in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to
the current period presentation.
3. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
October 31, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Fresh fruit |
$ | 3,525 | $ | 3,424 | ||||
Packing supplies and ingredients |
2,015 | 2,081 | ||||||
Finished processed foods |
4,556 | 5,870 | ||||||
$ | 10,096 | $ | 11,375 | |||||
Cost of goods sold for fiscal year 2005, 2004 and 2003, include inventory write-downs of $0.1
million, $0.3 million and $0.1 million. Write-downs in fiscal 2005 primarily related to a
reduction in the cost of pulp used in certain processed avocado products. Write-downs in fiscal
year 2004 primarily related to improper handling of product, which we believe related to a
subcontractors error. Write-downs in fiscal 2003 primarily related to reduced customer demand and
the discontinuance of various supplies for certain processed avocado products.
We assess the recoverability of inventories through an ongoing review of inventory levels in
relation to sales and forecasts, and product marketing plans. When the inventory on hand, at the
time of the review, exceeds the foreseeable demand, the value of inventory that is not expected to
be sold is written down. The amount of the write-down is the excess of historical cost over
estimated realizable value (generally zero). Once established, these write-downs are considered
permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the excess inventory.
The assessment of the recoverability of inventories and the amounts of any write-downs are
based on currently available information and assumptions about future demand and market conditions.
Demand for processed avocado products may fluctuate significantly over time, and actual demand and
market conditions may be more or less favorable than our projections. In the event that actual
demand is lower than originally projected, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
We may retain and make available for sale some or all of the inventories which have been
written down. In the event that actual demand is higher than originally projected, we may be able
to sell a portion of these inventories in the future. We generally scrap inventories which have
been written down and are identified as obsolete.
37
Table of Contents
4. Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
October 31, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Land |
$ | 952 | $ | 948 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
13,611 | 13,342 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
212 | 228 | ||||||
Equipment |
28,889 | 28,387 | ||||||
Information systems Hardware and software |
3,997 | 3,927 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
1,349 | 1,675 | ||||||
49,010 | 48,507 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(32,113 | ) | (31,080 | ) | ||||
$ | 16,897 | $ | 17,427 | |||||
The net book value of our old corporate headquarters building, located in Santa Ana,
California, totaling approximately $1.7 million, is recorded as Building held for sale in the
accompanying October 31, 2004 balance sheet. In March 2005, we completed the sale of such
corporate headquarters building for $3.4 million. This transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain on
sale of approximately $1.7 million. In conjunction with such sale, we relocated our corporate
offices to Santa Paula, California in March 2005. Total expenses related to such relocation
approximated $0.4 million. Depreciation expense was $2.7 million, $2.6 million and $2.0 million
for fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003.
5. Other Assets
During 1999, we established a Grower Development Program whereby funds could be advanced to
growers in exchange for their commitment to deliver a minimum volume of avocados on an annual
basis. As of October 31, 2005 and 2004, no additional amounts have been advanced pursuant to this
program. Subsequent to October 31, 2005, however, we advanced $0.7 million to certain growers
and expect to advance significant additional funds pursuant to this program in fiscal 2006. Advances are not repaid
and are amortized to cost of goods sold over the term of the related agreements. The financial statements for fiscal
years 2005, 2004, and 2003 include a charge of approximately $322,000, $322,000 and $308,000 representing the amortization of these advances.
6. Short-Term Borrowings
During calendar year 2005, we renewed our two short-term, non-collateralized, revolving credit
facilities. These credit facilities expire in February 2007 and April 2008 and are with separate
banks. Under the terms of these agreements, we are advanced funds for working capital purposes.
Total credit available under the combined short-term borrowing agreements was $24 million, with a
weighted-average interest rate of 4.8% and 2.9% at October 31, 2005 and 2004. Under these credit
facilities, we had $1.4 million and $2.0 million outstanding as of October 31, 2005 and 2004. The
credit facilities contain various financial covenants with which we were in compliance at October
31, 2005. The most significant financial covenants relate to working capital, tangible net worth
(as defined), and Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) (as
defined) requirements.
7. Employee Benefit Plans
We sponsor two defined contribution retirement plans for salaried and hourly employees.
Expenses for these plans approximated $399,000, $409,000, and $411,000 for fiscal years 2005, 2004
and 2003, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
financial statements.
We also sponsor a non-qualified defined benefit plan for two retired executives. Pension
expenses and actuarial losses approximated $65,000, $49,000, and $59,000 for the years ended
October 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, which are included in selling, general and administrative
expenses in the accompanying financial statements.
38
Table of Contents
Components of the change in projected benefit obligation for fiscal year ends consist of the
following (in thousands):
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Change in projected benefit obligation: |
||||||||
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year |
$ | 500 | $ | 506 | ||||
Interest cost |
28 | 30 | ||||||
Actuarial loss |
37 | 19 | ||||||
Benefits paid |
(55 | ) | (55 | ) | ||||
Projected benefit obligation at end of year (unfunded) |
$ | 510 | $ | 500 | ||||
The following is a reconciliation of the unfunded status of the plans at fiscal year ends
included in accrued expenses (in thousands):
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Projected benefit obligation |
$ | 510 | $ | 500 | ||||
Unrecognized net (gain) loss |
| | ||||||
Recorded pension liabilities |
$ | 510 | $ | 500 | ||||
Significant assumptions used in the determination of pension expense consist of the following:
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Discount rate on projected benefit obligation |
6.00 | % | 6.25 | % |
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and guarantees
We lease facilities and certain equipment under non cancelable operating leases expiring at
various dates through 2009. We are committed to make minimum cash payments under these agreements
as of October 31, 2005 as follows (in thousands):
2006 |
$ | 1,068 | ||
2007 |
836 | |||
2008 |
493 | |||
2009 |
221 | |||
2010 |
207 | |||
Thereafter |
881 | |||
$ | 3,706 | |||
Rental expenses amounted to approximately $1,158,000, $1,121,000, and $1,163,000 for the years
ended October 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003.
We indemnify our directors and have the power to indemnify each of our officers, employees and
other agents, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law. The maximum amount of potential
future payments under such indemnifications is not determinable. No amounts have been accrued in
the accompanying financial statements.
Litigation
We are currently under examination by the Mexican tax authorities (Hacienda) for the tax year
ended December 31, 2000. During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we received an assessment
totaling approximately $2.0 million from Hacienda related to the amount of income at our Mexican
subsidiary. Based primarily on discussions with legal counsel and the evaluation of our claim, we
believe that Haciendas position has no merit and that the Company will prevail. Accordingly, no
amounts have been provided in the financial statements as of October 31, 2005. We pledged our
processed products building located in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico as collateral to the Hacienda in
regards to this assessment.
We are also involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business that we do
not believe will have a material adverse impact on our financial statements.
39
Table of Contents
9. Related-Party Transactions
We sell papayas procured from an entity owned by the Chairman of our Board of Directors and
CEO. Sales of papayas amounted to approximately $6,251,000, $6,846,000, and $2,920,000 for the
years ended October 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, resulting in gross margins of approximately $510,000,
$864,000 and $281,000. Net amounts due to this entity approximated $79,000, $113,000, and $278,000
at October 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003.
Certain members of our Board of Directors market avocados through Calavo pursuant to our
customary marketing agreements. During the years ended October 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the
aggregate amount of avocados procured from entities owned or controlled by members of our Board of
Directors, was $5.2 million, $4.7 million and $4.5 million. Accounts payable to these Board
members were $0.2 million and $0.3 million as of October 31, 2005 and 2004.
In August 2005, we repurchased 200,000 shares of our common stock at an average price per
share of $10.00 from the estate of a deceased former member of our Board of Directors. In December
2005, we repurchased another 120,000 shares of our common stock at an average price per share of
$10.00 from the same estate.
See Note 12 for discussion related to our investment in Limoneira.
10. Income Taxes
The income tax provision consists of the following for the years ended October 31 (in
thousands):
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 3,046 | $ | 3,018 | $ | 3,639 | ||||||
State |
767 | 844 | 825 | |||||||||
Foreign |
293 | 25 | 81 | |||||||||
Total current |
4,106 | 3,887 | 4,545 | |||||||||
Deferred |
(1,925 | ) | (320 | ) | (226 | ) | ||||||
Total income tax provision |
$ | 2,181 | $ | 3,567 | $ | 4,319 | ||||||
At October 31, 2005 and 2004, gross deferred tax assets totaled approximately $3.1 million and
$2.0 million, while gross deferred tax liabilities totaled approximately $9.1 million and $1.1
million. Deferred income taxes reflect the net of temporary differences between the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. Significant
components of our deferred taxes as of October 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Allowances for accounts receivable |
$ | 2,065 | $ | 679 | ||||
Inventories |
325 | 647 | ||||||
State taxes |
80 | 257 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
181 | 192 | ||||||
Current deferred income taxes |
2,651 | 1,775 | ||||||
Property, plant, and equipment |
217 | (739 | ) | |||||
Intangible assets |
(282 | ) | (339 | ) | ||||
Unrealized Gain, Limoneira investment |
(8,798 | ) | | |||||
Retirement benefits |
218 | 217 | ||||||
Other |
56 | 21 | ||||||
Long-term deferred income taxes |
$ | (8,589 | ) | $ | (840 | ) | ||
40
Table of Contents
A reconciliation of the significant differences between the federal statutory income tax rate
and the effective income tax rate on pretax income is as follows:
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Federal statutory tax rate |
35 | % | 35 | % | 35 | % | ||||||
State taxes, net of federal effects |
5 | 5 | 4 | |||||||||
Foreign income taxes greater (less) than U.S. |
1 | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
Benefit of lower federal tax brackets |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||
Other |
| | 1 | |||||||||
40 | % | 36 | % | 38 | % | |||||||
We intend to reinvest our foreign earnings, which approximated $2.8 million at October 31,
2005, indefinitely. As a result, we have not provided any deferred income taxes on such unremitted
earnings.
For fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003, income before income taxes related to domestic
operations was approximately $4.8 million, $9.0 million, and $11.1 million. For fiscal years 2005,
2004 and 2003, income before income taxes related to foreign operations was approximately $0.7
million, $0.8 million and $0.4 million.
11. Segment Information
We operate and track results in three reportable segments: California avocados, international
avocados and perishable foods products, and processed products. These three business segments are
presented based on our management structure and information used by our president to measure
performance and allocate resources. The California avocados segment includes all operations that
involve the distribution of avocados grown in California. The international avocados and
perishable foods products segment includes both operations related to distribution of fresh
avocados grown outside of California and distribution of other perishable food items. The
processed products segment represents all operations related to the purchase, manufacturing, and
distribution of processed avocado products. Those costs that can be specifically identified with a
particular product line are charged directly to that product line. Costs that are not segment
specific are generally allocated based on two-year average sales dollars. We do not allocate assets
or specifically identify them to our operating segments.
International | ||||||||||||||||||||
avocados | ||||||||||||||||||||
and | ||||||||||||||||||||
perishable | ||||||||||||||||||||
California | food | Processed | Inter-segment | |||||||||||||||||
avocados | products | products | eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(All amounts are presented in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended October 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 116,308 | $ | 129,831 | $ | 34,699 | $ | (22,016 | ) | $ | 258,822 | |||||||||
Cost of sales |
105,806 | 123,262 | 30,036 | (22,016 | ) | 237,088 | ||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
10,502 | 6,569 | 4,663 | | 21,734 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
7,641 | 5,889 | 5,058 | | 18,588 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
2,861 | 680 | (395 | ) | | 3,146 | ||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
1,327 | 810 | 220 | | 2,357 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision
(benefit) for income taxes |
4,188 | 1,490 | (175 | ) | | 5,503 | ||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
1,660 | 591 | (70 | ) | | 2,181 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 2,528 | $ | 899 | $ | (105 | ) | $ | | $ | 3,322 | |||||||||
Year ended October 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 163,486 | $ | 94,423 | $ | 32,749 | $ | (16,440 | ) | $ | 274,218 | |||||||||
Cost of sales |
146,384 | 89,465 | 29,405 | (16,440 | ) | 248,814 | ||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
17,102 | 4,958 | 3,344 | | 25,404 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
7,190 | 3,850 | 4,880 | | 15,920 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring charge |
| | 185 | | 185 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
9,912 | 1,108 | (1,721 | ) | | 9,299 | ||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
334 | 125 | 19 | | 478 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision
(benefit) for income taxes |
10,246 | 1,233 | (1,702 | ) | | 9,777 | ||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
3,738 | 450 | (621 | ) | | 3,567 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,508 | $ | 783 | $ | (1,081 | ) | $ | | $ | 6,210 | |||||||||
41
Table of Contents
International | ||||||||||||||||||||
avocados | ||||||||||||||||||||
and | ||||||||||||||||||||
perishable | ||||||||||||||||||||
California | food | Processed | Inter-segment | |||||||||||||||||
avocados | products | products | eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended October 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 149,635 | $ | 75,347 | $ | 32,360 | $ | (10,581 | ) | $ | 246,761 | |||||||||
Cost of sales |
134,762 | 69,890 | 27,343 | (10,581 | ) | 221,414 | ||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
14,873 | 5,457 | 5,017 | | 25,347 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
6,705 | 2,951 | 4,995 | | 14,651 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring charge |
| | 106 | | 106 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
8,168 | 2,506 | (84 | ) | | 10,590 | ||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
714 | 162 | 13 | | 889 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision
(benefit) for income taxes |
8,882 | 2,668 | (71 | ) | | 11,479 | ||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
3,341 | 1,004 | (26 | ) | | 4,319 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 5,541 | $ | 1,664 | $ | (45 | ) | $ | | $ | 7,160 | |||||||||
The following table sets forth sales by product category, by segment (in thousands):
Year ended October 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
International | ||||||||||||||||
avocados and | ||||||||||||||||
California | perishable food | Processed | ||||||||||||||
avocados | products | products | Total | |||||||||||||
Third-party sales: |
||||||||||||||||
California avocados |
$ | 104,481 | $ | | $ | | $ | 104,481 | ||||||||
Imported avocados |
| 81,756 | | 81,756 | ||||||||||||
Papayas |
| 6,251 | | 6,251 | ||||||||||||
Specialities and tropicals |
| 13,777 | | 13,777 | ||||||||||||
Processed food service |
| | 28,307 | 28,307 | ||||||||||||
Processed retail and club |
| | 6,766 | 6,766 | ||||||||||||
Total fruit and product sales to third-parties |
104,481 | 101,784 | 35,073 | 241,338 | ||||||||||||
Freight and other charges |
7,699 | 16,430 | 258 | 24,387 | ||||||||||||
Total third-party sales |
112,180 | 118,214 | 35,331 | 265,725 | ||||||||||||
Less sales incentives |
(103 | ) | (2 | ) | (6,798 | ) | (6,903 | ) | ||||||||
Total net sales to third-parties |
112,077 | 118,212 | 28,533 | 258,822 | ||||||||||||
Intercompany sales |
4,231 | 11,619 | 6,166 | 22,016 | ||||||||||||
Net sales before eliminations |
$ | 116,308 | $ | 129,831 | $ | 34,699 | 280,838 | |||||||||
Intercompany sales eliminations |
(22,016 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Consolidated net sales |
$ | 258,822 | ||||||||||||||
Year ended October 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
International | ||||||||||||||||
avocados and | ||||||||||||||||
California | perishable food | Processed | ||||||||||||||
avocados | products | products | Total | |||||||||||||
Third-party sales: |
||||||||||||||||
California avocados |
$ | 150,159 | $ | | $ | | $ | 150,159 | ||||||||
Imported avocados |
| 54,589 | | 54,589 | ||||||||||||
Papayas |
| 6,846 | | 6,846 | ||||||||||||
Specialities and tropicals |
| 14,233 | | 14,233 | ||||||||||||
Processed food service |
| | 27,352 | 27,352 | ||||||||||||
Processed retail and club |
| | 4,285 | 4,285 | ||||||||||||
Total fruit and product sales to third-parties |
150,159 | 75,668 | 31,637 | 257,464 | ||||||||||||
Freight and other charges |
11,946 | 10,968 | 534 | 23,448 | ||||||||||||
Total third-party sales |
162,105 | 86,636 | 32,171 | 280,912 | ||||||||||||
Less sales incentives |
(131 | ) | (48 | ) | (6,515 | ) | (6,694 | ) | ||||||||
Total net sales to third-parties |
161,974 | 86,588 | 25,656 | 274,218 | ||||||||||||
Intercompany sales |
1,512 | 7,835 | 7,093 | 16,440 | ||||||||||||
Net sales before eliminations |
$ | 163,486 | $ | 94,423 | $ | 32,749 | 290,658 | |||||||||
Intercompany sales eliminations |
(16,440 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Consolidated net sales |
$ | 274,218 | ||||||||||||||
42
Table of Contents
Year ended October 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
International | ||||||||||||||||
Avocados and | ||||||||||||||||
California | Perishable Food | Processed | ||||||||||||||
Avocados | Products | Products | Total | |||||||||||||
Third-party sales: |
||||||||||||||||
California avocados |
$ | 140,795 | $ | | $ | | $ | 140,795 | ||||||||
Imported avocados |
| 56,306 | | 56,306 | ||||||||||||
Papayas |
| 2,920 | | 2,920 | ||||||||||||
Specialities and tropicals |
| 30 | | 30 | ||||||||||||
Processed food service |
| | 28,545 | 28,545 | ||||||||||||
Processed retail and club |
| | 5,165 | 5,165 | ||||||||||||
Total fruit and product sales to third-parties |
140,795 | 59,256 | 33,710 | 233,761 | ||||||||||||
Freight and other charges |
8,997 | 10,079 | 290 | 19,366 | ||||||||||||
Total third-party sales |
149,792 | 69,335 | 34,000 | 253,127 | ||||||||||||
Less sales incentives |
(157 | ) | (251 | ) | (5,958 | ) | (6,366 | ) | ||||||||
Total net sales to third-parties |
149,635 | 69,084 | 28,042 | 246,761 | ||||||||||||
Intercompany sales |
| 6,263 | 4,318 | 10,581 | ||||||||||||
Net sales before eliminations |
$ | 149,635 | $ | 75,347 | $ | 32,360 | 257,342 | |||||||||
Intercompany sales eliminations |
(10,581 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Consolidated net sales |
$ | 246,761 | ||||||||||||||
Long-lived assets attributed to geographic areas as of October 31 are as follows (in
thousands):
United States | Mexico | Consolidated | ||||||||||
2005 |
$ | 55,587 | $ | 11,849 | $ | 67,436 | ||||||
2004 |
$ | 11,761 | $ | 12,697 | $ | 24,458 |
Sales to customers outside the United States were approximately $15.9 million, $16.2 million
and $15.7 million for the three years ended October 31, 2005.
12. Investment in Limoneira Company
In order to increase our market share of California avocados and increase synergies within the
marketplace, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Limoneira Company (Limoneira) in June
2005. Pursuant to such agreement, we acquired approximately 15.1% of Limoneiras outstanding
common stock for $23.45 million and Limoneira acquired approximately 6.9% of our outstanding common
stock for $10 million. The transaction was settled by a net cash
payment by us of $13.45 million. Additionally, such agreement also provided for: (1) Calavo to lease office
space from Limoneira in Santa Paula, California for a period of 10 years at an initial annual gross
rental of approximately $0.2 million (subject to annual CPI increases, as defined), (2) Calavo to
market Limoneiras avocados and (3) Calavo and Limoneira to use good faith reasonable efforts to
maximize avocado packing efficiencies for both parties by consolidating their fruit packing
operations. Various opportunities are currently being considered, including the use of existing
packing facilities, an investment in existing vacant facilities, and/or an investment in a new
consolidated facility for both parties.
Limoneira, which generated total revenues of approximately $26 million during fiscal 2004,
primarily engages in growing citrus and avocados, picking and hauling citrus, and packing lemons.
The issuances of the shares discussed above are exempt from registration under federal and state
securities laws.
As a result of the ownership percentage acquired in Limoneira, we recognize only dividends
received from Limoneira as income. Such investment is reported at fair value at the balance sheet
date. Fair value is determined based on quoted market prices. Unrealized gains and losses related
to such investment are reported in other comprehensive income. Based on the overall state of the
stock market, the availability of buyers for the shares when we want to sell, and other
restrictions, at any point in time the amounts ultimately realized upon liquidation of these
securities may be significantly different than the carrying value.
43
Table of Contents
13. Long-Term Obligations
Long-term obligations at fiscal year ends consist of the following (in thousands):
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Farm Credit West, PCA |
$ | 13,000 | $ | | ||||
Other |
32 | 56 | ||||||
13,032 | 56 | |||||||
Less current portion |
(1,313 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||
$ | 11,719 | $ | 34 | |||||
In July 2005, we entered into a non-collateralized term loan agreement with Farm Credit West,
PCA to finance the purchase of our Limoneira Stock. Pursuant to such agreement, we borrowed $13.0
million, which is to be repaid in 10 annual installments of $1.3 million. Such annual installments
begin July 2006 and continue through July 2015. Interest is to be paid monthly, in arrears,
beginning August 2005 through the life of the loan. Such loan bears interest at a fixed rate of
5.70%.
Such loan contains various financial covenants, which are substantially identical to existing
covenants, with which we were in compliance at October 31, 2005. The most significant financial
covenants relate to working capital, tangible net worth (as defined), and Earnings Before Interest,
Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) (as defined) requirements.
At October 31, 2005, annual debt payments are scheduled as follows (in thousands):
Total | ||||
Year ending October 31: |
||||
2006 |
$ | 1,313 | ||
2007 |
1,309 | |||
2008 |
1,308 | |||
2009 |
1,302 | |||
2010 |
1,300 | |||
Thereafter |
6,500 | |||
$ | 13,032 | |||
14. Stock-Based Compensation
In November 2001, our Board of Directors approved two stock-based compensation plans.
The Directors Stock Option Plan
Participation in the directors stock option plan is limited to members of our Board of
Directors. The plan makes available to the Board of Directors, or a plan administrator, the right
to grant options to purchase up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock. In connection with the
adoption of the plan, the Board of Directors approved an award of fully vested options to purchase
1,240,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. We anticipate
terminating this plan during fiscal 2006. Outstanding options would not be impacted by such
termination.
In January 2002, members of our Board of Directors elected to exercise options to purchase
approximately 1,005,000 shares of common stock. The exercise price was paid by delivery of
full-recourse promissory notes with a face value of $4,789,000 and by cash payments of
approximately $236,000. These notes and the related security agreements provide, among other
things, that each director pledge as collateral the shares acquired upon exercise of the stock
option, as well as additional shares of common stock held by the directors with a value equal to
10% of the loan amount, if the exercise price was paid by means of a full-recourse note. The
notes, which bear interest at 7% per annum, provide for annual interest payments with a final
principal payment due March 1, 2007. Directors will be allowed to withdraw shares from the pledged
pool of common stock prior to repayment of their notes, as long as the fair value of the remaining
pledged shares is at least equal to 120% of the outstanding note balance. The notes have been
presented as a reduction of shareholders equity as of October 31, 2005 and 2004.
During fiscal 2005, directors did not make any principal payments related to these notes and
we have recorded interest income of $175,000. During fiscal 2004, directors made principal
payments of $416,000 related to these notes and we have recorded interest income of $189,000. As
of October 31, 2005, we have accrued interest receivable of $112,000 related to these notes, which
is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets.
44
Table of Contents
In December 2003, our Board of Directors approved the issuance of options to acquire a total
of 50,000 shares of our common stock to two members of our Board of Directors. Each option to
acquire 25,000 shares vests in substantially equal installments over a three-year period, has an
exercise price of $7.00 per share, and has a term of five years from the grant date. The market
price of our common stock at the grant date was $10.01. In accordance with APB 25, we are
recording compensation expense of approximately $151,000 over the vesting period of three years
from the grant date. During fiscal years 2005 and 2004, we recognized $50,000 and $46,000 of
compensation expense with respect to stock option awards pursuant to APB 25.
In
December 2005, the related stock option agreements were modified
to shorten the option terms, as defined. Such modifications were
contemplated primarily as a result of Section 409A of the tax code.
A summary of stock option activity follows (shares in thousands):
Year ended October 31, 2005 | ||||||||
Weighted-Average | ||||||||
Number of Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period |
155 | $ | 5.65 | |||||
Exercised |
(55 | ) | $ | 5.00 | ||||
Outstanding at end of period |
100 | $ | 6.00 | |||||
Exercisable at end of period |
67 | $ | 5.50 | |||||
Year ended October 31, 2004 | ||||||||
Weighted-Average | ||||||||
Number of Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period |
105 | $ | 5.00 | |||||
Granted |
50 | 7.00 | ||||||
Outstanding at end of period |
155 | $ | 5.65 | |||||
Exercisable at end of period |
105 | $ | 5.00 | |||||
Weighted-average fair value of options
granted during the year |
$ | 3.02 |
The following table summarizes stock options outstanding at October 31, 2005(shares in
thousands):
Outstanding | ||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||
Remaining | ||||||||||||
Range of | Number of | Contractual Life | Weighted-Average | |||||||||
Exercise Prices | Shares | (Years) | Exercise Price | |||||||||
$5.00 -
$7.00
|
100 | 2.10 | $ | 6.00 |
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The employee stock purchase plan was approved by our Board of Directors and shareholders.
Participation in the employee stock purchase plan is limited to employees. The plan provides the
Board of Directors, or a plan administrator, the right to make available up to 2,000,000 shares of
common stock at a price not less than fair market value. In March 2002, the Board of Directors
awarded selected employees the opportunity to purchase up to 474,000 shares of common stock at
$7.00 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the date prior to the grant. The plan
also permits us to advance all or some of the purchase price of the purchased stock to the employee
upon the execution of a full-recourse note at prevailing interest rates. These awards expired in
April 2002, with 84 participating employees electing to purchase approximately 279,000 shares.
The purchase price was paid by delivery of full-recourse promissory notes with a face value of
$1,352,000 and by cash payments of approximately $600,000. These notes and the related security
agreements provide, among other things, that each employee pledge as collateral the shares
acquired. The notes, which bear interest at 7% per annum, provide for annual interest and
principal payments for a period of two to four years. The notes have been presented as a reduction
of shareholders equity as of October 31, 2005 and October 2004.
During fiscal 2005, employees made principal payments of $247,000 related to these notes, and
we have recorded interest income of $20,000. During fiscal 2004, employees made principal payments
of $263,000 related to these notes, and we have recorded interest income of $46,000. As of October
31, 2005, we have accrued interest receivable of $7,000 related to these notes, which is included
in prepaid expenses and other current assets.
45
Table of Contents
The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan
The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan of Calavo Growers, Inc. (the 2005 Plan) was approved by our
Board of Directors and shareholders. The 2005 Plan authorizes the granting of the following types
of awards to persons who are employees, officers, consultants, advisors, or directors of Calavo
Growers, Inc. or any of its affiliates:
| Incentive stock options that are intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations thereunder; | |
| Non-qualified stock options that are not intended to be incentive stock options; and | |
| Shares of common stock that are subject to specified restrictions |
Subject to the adjustment provisions of the 2005 Plan that are applicable in the event of a
stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or similar transaction, up to 2,500,000 shares of
common stock may be issued under the 2005 Plan and no person shall be granted awards under the 2005
Plan during any 12-month period that cover more then 500,000 shares of common stock.
In August 2005, our Board of Directors approved the issuance of options to acquire a total of
400,000 shares of our common stock to various employees of the Company. The options vest if the
closing price of our common stock is at least $11.00 per share at any time throughout the life of
the option. At no time, however, may any options vest within one year from the date of grant.
Additionally, such options have an exercise price of $9.10 per share and a term of 5 years from the
grant date. The market price of our common stock at the grant date was $9.10.
In accordance with APB 25, a measurement date cannot occur related to such option grant until
such market condition is satisfied. In such situations, APB 25 requires that estimates of
compensation cost be recorded before the measurement date based on quoted market prices of the
stock at intervening dates. At October 31, 2005, the market price of our common stock was $9.61.
As such, we recognized $34,000 of compensation expense during fiscal 2005.
15. Dividends
In January 2006, we paid a $0.32 per share dividend in the aggregate amount of $4.6 million to
shareholders of record on December 15, 2005. In January 2005, we paid a $0.30 per share dividend
in the aggregate amount of $4.1 million to shareholders of record on November 15, 2004.
16. Processed Product Segment Restructuring
In February 2003, our Board of Directors approved a plan whereby the operations of our
processed products business would be relocated. The plan called for the closing of our Santa
Paula, California and Mexicali, Baja California Norte processing facilities and the relocation of
these operations to a new facility in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico. This restructuring has provided
for cost savings in the elimination of certain transportation costs, duplicative overhead
structures, and savings in the overall cost of labor and services. The Uruapan facility commenced
operations in February 2004 and the Santa Paula and Mexicali facilities were closed in February
2003 and August 2004. During fiscal 2005, we incurred costs related to this restructuring
approximating $0.4 million, which are recorded in our income statement as both cost of sales ($0.3
million) and selling, general and administrative expenses ($0.1 million). All the above amounts
have been paid and we do not expect any additional operating costs related to this restructuring.
46
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
Calavo Growers, Inc.
Santa Paula, CA
Calavo Growers, Inc.
Santa Paula, CA
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Calavo Growers, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of October 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements
of income, comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended October 31, 2005. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule
listed at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company and its subsidiaries at October 31, 2005
and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended October 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule,
when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of October 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
and our report dated January 31, 2006 expressed an adverse opinion on managements assessment of
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting because of
managements omission of a material weakness from its report and expressed and an adverse opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, California
January 31, 2006
January 31, 2006
47
Table of Contents
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report.
The decision to restate our consolidated statements of cash flows, as discussed below, does not cause our management to
change its conclusion that our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of October 31, 2005.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision
and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this report based on the
framework set forth in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework
set forth in Internal Control Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal
control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2005. Our managements assessment
of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2005 has
been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated
in their report which is included herein.
In January 2006, we filed an amended Form 10Q to restate the Companys interim
consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2005 related to
amounts on the Companys consolidated statement of cash flows. Specifically, the amendment
reflects an adjustment in the presentation of the Companys common stock issued in conjunction with
acquiring Limoneira Company common stock, pursuant to the stock purchase agreement more fully
described in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements. In such amended Form 10Q, we
presented the portion of the transaction that was not settled in cash as a non-cash investing and financing
activity, while in the original Form 10Q, we presented such non-cash portion as cash flows in the investing
and financing activities section. Note that there was no change to
the net decrease in cash and cash equivalents. Further, these changes had no impact on our
consolidated statements of income, consolidated balance sheets or consolidated statements of
shareholders equity.
The decision to restate our consolidated statements of cash flows, as discussed above, does
not cause our management to change its conclusion that our internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of October 31, 2005. Based on the SECs Staff Statement on Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (dated May 16, 2005), we believe that, to a
significant degree, the determination of whether a material weakness exists in our financial
reporting involves subjective judgment and we do not believe that such restatement, given the facts
and circumstances of our situation, constitutes a material weakness in internal control over
financial reporting. Management reviewed SFAS 95, Statement of Cash Flows, and held discussions
internally to determine proper disclosure in our consolidated statements of cash flow. Based on
these procedures, we reached the conclusion that the presentation of cash flows from investing and
financing activities was appropriate. Subsequent to filing our third quarter financial statements, we
reconsidered the accounting treatment of noncash investing and financing activities and we now believe
that the portion of the transaction that was not settled in cash should be presented as a non-cash investing and
financing activity. The restatement of
our Form 10Q conforms our consolidated statements of cash flows to that accounting treatment.
Under these circumstances, our management does not believe that the restatements resulted from, or
require a finding of, a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.
That conclusion was discussed with, and approved by, the Audit Committee of our Board of
Directors.
Deloitte & Touche LLP,
our independent registered public accounting firm, has informed us that it believes
that the restatement of our consolidated statements of cash flows did
result from a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.
48
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING
To The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Calavo Growers, Inc.:
Calavo Growers, Inc.:
We have
audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Calavo Growers, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2005, based on criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including
the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a
significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a
material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.
We have identified the following material weakness that has not been identified and included as a
material weakness in managements assessment: The Companys controls over the proper
classification of cash flows in an unusual transaction did not operate effectively
as of October 31, 2005 to identify a misclassification of cash flows associated
with a non-routine transaction between financing and investing activities. This
material weakness resulted in the restatement of the Companys
previously issued quarterly financial statements for the period ended
July 31, 2005. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and
extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the consolidated
financial statements as of and for the year ended October 31, 2005,
of the Company and this report does not affect our report on such financial statements.
In our opinion,
because of the omission of the material weakness described above from managements assessment,
managements assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control
over financial reporting as of October 31, 2005, is not fairly stated, in all material respects, based
on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, because of the effect of the
material weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31,
2005, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We do not express an opinion
or any other form of assurance on managements statements appearing in the third paragraph of Managements Report
on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
We have also audited,
in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statements
schedule as of and for the year ended October 31, 2005 of the
Company and our report dated January 31, 2006 expressed an
unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, California
January 31, 2006
January 31, 2006
49
Table of Contents
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended October 31, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Annual Report because we will
file a definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Regulation 14A
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Proxy Statement), not later than 120 days after the
end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report, and the applicable information included in
the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Information regarding our executive officers is set forth under Executive Officers in Part
I., Item 4 of this Annual Report.
The remaining information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled Election of Directors and Audit
Committee.
Information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the
section of the Proxy Statement entitled Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees.
A copy of the code of ethics is posted on our Internet site at http://www.calavo.com. In the
event that we make any amendment to, or grant any waiver of, a provision of the code of ethics that
applies to our principal executive officer or principal financial officer and that requires
disclosure under applicable SEC rules, we intend to disclose such amendment or waiver and the
reasons for the amendment or waiver on our Internet site.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the
sections of the Proxy Statement entitled Executive Compensation and Directors Compensation.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Information required by Items 201(d) and 403 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections of the Proxy Statement entitled Equity Compensation Plan Information
and Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
50
Table of Contents
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
We sell papayas procured from an entity owned by the Chairman of our Board of Directors and
CEO. Sales of papayas amounted to approximately $6,251,000, $6,846,000, and $2,920,000 for the
years ended October 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, resulting in gross margins of approximately $510,000,
$864,000 and $281,000. Net amounts due to this entity approximated $79,000, $113,000, and $278,000
at October 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003.
Certain members of our Board of Directors market avocados through Calavo pursuant to our
customary marketing agreements. During the years ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, the aggregate
amount of avocados procured from entities owned or controlled by members of our Board of Directors,
was $5.2 million and $4.7 million. Accounts payable to these Board members were $0.2 million and
$0.3 million as of October 31, 2005 and 2004.
Additional information required by Item 404 of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by
reference to the section of the Proxy Statement entitled Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions.
Item 14. Principal Accountants Fees and Services
Information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section of the
Proxy Statement entitled Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
51
Table of Contents
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
|
(1 | ) | Financial Statements | |||
The following consolidated financial statements as of October 31, 2005 and 2004 and for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2005 are included herewith: | ||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and Report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | ||||||
(2 | ) | Supplemental Schedules | ||||
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts | ||||||
All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. | ||||||
(3 | ) | Exhibits |
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
2.1
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated as of February 20, 2001 between Calavo Growers, Inc. and Calavo Growers of California.1 | |
2.2
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 7, 2003 Among Calavo Growers, Inc., Calavo Acquisition, Inc., Maui Fresh International, Inc. and Arthur J. Bruno, Robert J. Bruno and Javier J. Badillo7 | |
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation of Calavo Growers, Inc. 1 | |
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Calavo Growers, Inc.3 | |
10.1
|
Form of Marketing Agreement for Calavo Growers, Inc.8 | |
10.2
|
Marketing Agreement dated as of April 1, 1996 between Tropical Hawaiian Products, Inc., a Hawaiian corporation, and Calavo Growers of California. 1 | |
10.3
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of June 1, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 | |
10.4
|
Lease Agreement dated as of November 21, 1997, between Tede S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, and Calavo de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, including attached Guaranty of Calavo Growers of California dated December 16, 1996.1 | |
10.5
|
Lease agreement dated as of February 15, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 | |
10.6
|
Standstill agreement dated June 1, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 | |
10.7
|
Standstill agreement dated June 1, 2005 between Calavo Growers, Inc. And Limoneira Company4 |
52
Table of Contents
10.8
|
Term Loan Agreement dated July 1, 2005, between Farm Credit West, PCA, and Calavo Growers, Inc.5 | |
10.9
|
2005 Stock Incentive Plan Of Calavo Growers, Inc.6 | |
10.10
|
Calavo Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated March 11, 1989 between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of California. 1 | |
10.11
|
Amendment to the Calavo Growers of California Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated November 9, 1993 Between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of California. 1 | |
10.12
|
2001 Stock Option Plan for Directors.2 | |
10.13
|
2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Officers and Employees.2 | |
10.14
|
Line of Credit Agreement between Farm Credit West, PCA and Calavo Growers, Inc., dated August 17, 2005 | |
10.15
|
Business Loan Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. and Calavo Growers, Inc., dated January 30, 20049 | |
10.16
|
Renewal Notice for Business Loan Agreement, dated January 30, 2004, Between Bank of America and Calavo Growers, Inc., dated November 18, 2005 | |
10.17
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement | |
21.1
|
Subsidiaries of Calavo Growers, Inc. 1 | |
23.1
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) | |
32
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
1 | Previously filed on April 24, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-59418, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
2 | Previously filed on December 18, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-75378, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
3 | Previously filed on December 19, 2002 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference. Previously filed on June 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. | |
4 | Previously filed on June 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. | |
5 | Previously filed on September 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. | |
6 | Previously filed on March 21, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF14A and incorporated herein by reference. | |
7 | Previously filed on January 23, 2004 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. | |
8 | Previously filed on January 28, 2003 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. | |
9 | Previously filed on January 14, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. |
53
Table of Contents
(b) Exhibits
See subsection (a) (3) above.
(c) Financial Statement Schedules
See subsection (a) (1) and (2) above.
54
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, on January 31, 2006.
CALAVO GROWERS, INC |
||||
By: | /s/ Lecil E. Cole | |||
Lecil E. Cole | ||||
Chairman of the Board of
Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President |
||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below on January 31, 2006 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities indicated:
Signature | Title | |
/s/ Lecil E. Cole
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
/s/ Arthur J. Bruno
|
Chief Operating Officer, Chief
Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
/s/ James E. Snyder
|
Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
/s/ Donald M. Sanders
|
Director | |
/s/ Fred J. Ferrazzano
|
Director | |
/s/ John M. Hunt
|
Director | |
/s/ George H. Barnes
|
Director | |
/s/ J. Link Leavens
|
Director | |
/s/ Alva V. Snider
|
Director | |
/s/ Michael D. Hause
|
Director | |
/s/ Dorcas H. McFarlane
|
Director | |
/s/ Egidio Carbone, Jr
|
Director | |
/s/ Scott Van Der Kar
|
Director |
55
Table of Contents
SCHEDULE II
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (in thousands)
Fiscal year | Balance at | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||
ended | beginning | end | ||||||||||||||||||
October 31: | of year | Additions(1) | Deductions(2) | of year | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for customer deductions |
2003 | $ | 261 | $ | 1,085 | $ | 687 | $ | 659 | |||||||||||
2004 | 659 | 3,817 | 3,454 | 1,022 | ||||||||||||||||
2005 | 1,022 | 6,791 | 5,663 | 2,150 | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
2003 | 25 | 19 | 3 | 41 | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 41 | 25 | 1 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||
2005 | 65 | 475 | 2 | 538 |
(1) | Charged to net sales (customer deductions) or costs and expenses (doubtful accounts). | |
(2) | Write-off of assets |
56
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
2.1
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated as of February 20, 2001 between Calavo Growers, Inc. and Calavo Growers of California.1 | |
2.2
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 7, 2003 Among Calavo Growers, Inc., Calavo Acquisition, Inc., Maui Fresh International, Inc. and Arthur J. Bruno, Robert J. Bruno and Javier J. Badillo7 | |
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation of Calavo Growers, Inc. 1 | |
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Calavo Growers, Inc.3 | |
10.1
|
Form of Marketing Agreement for Calavo Growers, Inc.8 | |
10.2
|
Marketing Agreement dated as of April 1, 1996 between Tropical Hawaiian Products, Inc., a Hawaiian corporation, and Calavo Growers of California. 1 | |
10.3
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of June 1, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 | |
10.4
|
Lease Agreement dated as of November 21, 1997, between Tede S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, and Calavo de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, including attached Guaranty of Calavo Growers of California dated December 16, 1996.1 | |
10.5
|
Lease agreement dated as of February 15, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 | |
10.6
|
Standstill agreement dated June 1, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 | |
10.7
|
Standstill agreement dated June 1, 2005 between Calavo Growers, Inc. And Limoneira Company4 | |
10.8
|
Term Loan Agreement dated July 1, 2005, between Farm Credit West, PCA, and Calavo Growers, Inc.5 | |
10.9
|
2005 Stock Incentive Plan Of Calavo Growers, Inc.6 | |
10.10
|
Calavo Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated March 11, 1989 between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of California. 1 | |
10.11
|
Amendment to the Calavo Growers of California Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated November 9, 1993 Between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of California. 1 | |
10.12
|
2001 Stock Option Plan for Directors.2 | |
10.13
|
2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Officers and Employees.2 | |
10.14
|
Line of Credit Agreement between Farm Credit West, PCA and Calavo Growers, Inc., dated August 17, 2005 | |
10.15
|
Business Loan Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. and Calavo Growers, Inc., dated January 30, 20049 | |
10.16
|
Renewal Notice for Business Loan Agreement, dated January 30, 2004, Between Bank of America and Calavo Growers, Inc., dated November 18, 2005 | |
10.17
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement | |
21.1
|
Subsidiaries of Calavo Growers, Inc. 1 | |
23.1
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) | |
32
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
57
Table of Contents
1 | Previously filed on April 24, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-59418, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
2 | Previously filed on December 18, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-75378, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
3 | Previously filed on December 19, 2002 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference. Previously filed on June 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. | |
4 | Previously filed on June 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. | |
5 | Previously filed on September 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. | |
6 | Previously filed on March 21, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF14A and incorporated herein by reference. | |
7 | Previously filed on January 23, 2004 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. | |
8 | Previously filed on January 28, 2003 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. | |
9 | Previously filed on January 14, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. |
58