CALAVO GROWERS INC - Annual Report: 2007 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007
Commission file number: 000-33385
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California (State of incorporation) |
33-0945304 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1141-A Cummings Road, Santa Paula, CA (Address of principal executive offices) |
93060 (Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (805) 525-1245
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name Of Each Exchange | ||||
Title of Each Class | On Which Registered | |||
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value per Share | Nasdaq Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated Filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark if whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Based
on the closing price as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, the aggregate market
value of the Registrants Common Stock held by non-affiliates on April 30, 2007 (the last business
day of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $155
million. Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer and director and by each
shareholder affiliated with a director or an executive officer have been excluded from this
calculation because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate
status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. The number of outstanding
shares of the Registrants Common Stock as of November 30, 2007 was 14,375,833.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions
of the Registrants Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
which we intend to hold on April 23, 2008, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form
10-K. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days after October 31, 2007.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements relating to future results of Calavo Growers,
Inc. (including certain projections and business trends) that are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the safe harbor created by those
sections. Forward-looking statements frequently are identifiable by the use of words such as
believe, anticipate, expect, intend, will, and other similar expressions. Our actual
results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties.
These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: increased competition, general
economic and business conditions, energy costs and availability, conducting substantial amounts of
business internationally, pricing pressures on agricultural products, adverse weather and growing
conditions confronting avocado growers, new governmental regulations, as well as other risks and
uncertainties, including those set forth in Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K and those detailed from time to time in our other filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and
we undertake no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise.
2
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Business
General development of the business
Calavo Growers, Inc. (Calavo, the Company, we, us or our) procures and markets avocados and
other perishable commodities and prepares and distributes processed avocado products. Our
expertise in marketing and distributing avocados, processed avocados, and other perishable foods
allows us to deliver a wide array of fresh and processed food products to food distributors,
produce wholesalers, supermarkets, and restaurants on a worldwide basis. We procure avocados
principally from California, Mexico, and Chile. Through our operating facilities in southern
California, Texas, New Jersey, Arizona, and Mexico, we sort, pack, and/or ripen avocados for
distribution both domestically and internationally. Additionally, we also distribute other
perishable foods, such as tomatoes and Hawaiian grown papayas, and prepare processed avocado
products. We report our operations in two different business segments: (1) fresh products and (2)
processed products. See footnote 11 in our consolidated financial statements for further
information about our business segments.
On October 9, 2001, we completed a series of transactions whereby common and preferred
shareholders of Calavo Growers of California (the Cooperative), an agricultural marketing
cooperative association, exchanged all of their outstanding shares for shares of our common stock.
Concurrent with this transaction, the Cooperative was merged into us with Calavo Growers, Inc.
(Calavo) emerging as the surviving entity. These transactions had the effect of converting the
legal structure of the business from a non profit cooperative to a for-profit corporation. All
references herein to us for periods prior to the merger refer to the business and operations of the
Cooperative.
In February 2003, our Board of Directors approved a plan whereby the operations of our
processed products business would be relocated. The plan called for the closing of our Santa
Paula, California and Mexicali, Baja California Norte processing facilities and the relocation of
these operations to a new facility in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico. This restructuring has provided
for cost savings in the elimination of certain transportation costs, duplicative overhead
structures, and savings in the overall cost of labor and services. The Uruapan facility commenced
operations in February 2004 and the Santa Paula and Mexicali facilities were closed in February
2003 and August 2004.
In November 2003, we acquired all the outstanding common shares of Maui Fresh International,
Inc. (Maui). Maui distributed a multi-product line of produce through retail, food service and
terminal market wholesale channels. Maui had significant operations in California, Nogales,
Arizona, and Hawaii. Maui packed and distributed a diversified line, comprised of more than 20
commodities, including tropical, speciality, and exotic fruits, chilies and hothouse-grown items,
as well as other conventional fruits and vegetables.
In March 2005, we completed the sale of our old corporate headquarters building (located in
Santa Ana) for $3.4 million. This transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain on sale of approximately
$1.7 million. In conjunction with such sale, we relocated our corporate offices to Santa Paula,
California in March 2005. Total expenses related to such relocation approximated $0.4 million.
In June 2005, in order to increase our market share of California avocados and increase
synergies within the marketplace, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Limoneira Company
(Limoneira). Pursuant to such agreement, we acquired approximately 15.1% of Limoneiras
outstanding common stock for $23.45 million and Limoneira acquired approximately 6.9% of our
outstanding common stock for $10 million. The transaction was settled by a net cash payment by us
of $13.45 million. Additionally, such agreement also provided for: (1) Calavo to lease office
space from Limoneira in Santa Paula, California for a period of 10 years at an initial annual gross
rental of approximately $0.2 million (subject to annual CPI increases, as defined), (2) Calavo to
market Limoneiras avocados and (3) Calavo and Limoneira to use good faith reasonable efforts to
maximize avocado packing efficiencies for both parties by consolidating their fruit packing
operations. Limoneira primarily engages in growing citrus and avocados, picking and hauling
citrus, and packing lemons. The issuances of the shares discussed
above were exempt from
registration under federal and state securities laws.
In August 2006, we entered into a joint venture agreement with San Rafael Distributing (SRD)
for the purpose of the marketing, sale and distribution of fresh produce from the existing location
of SRD at the Los Angeles Wholesale Produce Market (Terminal Market), located in Los Angeles,
California. Such joint venture operates under the name of Maui Fresh International, LLC (Maui
Fresh) and commenced operations in August 2006. SRD and Calavo each have an equal one-half
ownership interest in Maui Fresh, but SRD shall have overall management responsibility for the
operations of Maui Fresh at the Terminal Market. We use the equity method to account for our
investment.
3
Table of Contents
In June 2007, we entered into a distribution agreement with Agricola Belher (Belher) of
Mexico, a well-established quality producer of fresh vegetables, primarily tomatoes, for export to
the U.S. market. Pursuant to such distribution agreement, Belher agreed, at their sole cost and
expense, to harvest, pack, export, ship, and deliver tomatoes exclusively to our Arizona facility.
In exchange, we agreed to sell and distribute such tomatoes, advance $2 million to Belher for
operating purposes, provide additional advances as shipments are made during the season (subject to
limitations, as defined), and return the proceeds from such tomato sales to Belher, net of our
commission and aforementioned advances. The agreement also allows for us to advance additional
amounts to Belher at our sole discretion. All advances that remain outstanding as of June 2008 are
immediately due and payable. As of October 31, 2007, we have advanced $2 million to Belher
pursuant to this agreement.
Concurrently, we also entered into an infrastructure agreement in June 2007 with Belher in
order to significantly increase production yields and fruit quality. Pursuant to this agreement,
we are to advance up to $5 million to be used solely for the acquisition, construction, and
installation of improvements to and on certain land owned by Belher, as well as packing line
equipment. Advances incur interest at 9.4% at October 31, 2007. We advanced $5.0 million as of
October 31, 2007 ($1.0 million included in prepaid expenses
and other current assets and $4.0 million included in other
long-term assets). Belher is to annually repay these advances in no
less than 20% increments through July 2012. In addition, the agreement allows for additional
$1.0 million advances to take place during the last five months of each of our fiscal years
2008 through 2010, but they are subject to certain
conditions and are to be made at our sole discretion. Belher is to annually repay these advances
in full on or before each of July 2008 through July 2010. Interest is to be paid monthly
or annually, as defined. Belher may prepay, without penalty, all or any portion of the advances at any time.
In order to secure their obligations pursuant to both agreements discussed above, Belher
granted us a first-priority security interest in certain assets, including cash, inventory and
fixed assets, as defined.
Our principal executive offices are located at 1141-A Cummings Road, Santa Paula, California
93060; telephone (805) 525-1245.
At October 31, 2007, we employed approximately 830 employees worldwide.
Available information
We maintain an Internet website at http://www.calavo.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports filed or
furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and other information related to us, are available, free of charge, on our website as soon
as reasonably practicable after we electronically file those documents with, or otherwise furnish
them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Internet website and the information
contained therein, or connected thereto, is not and is not intended to be incorporated into this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Fresh products
Calavo was founded in 1924 to market California avocados. In California, the growing area
stretches from San Diego County to Monterey County, with the majority of the growing areas located
approximately 100 miles north and south of Los Angeles County. The storage life of fresh avocados
is limited. It generally ranges from one to four weeks, depending upon the maturity of the fruit,
the growing methods used, and the handling conditions in the distribution chain.
We sell avocados to a diverse group of supermarket chains, wholesalers, food service and other
distributors, under the Calavo family of brand labels, as well as private labels. The
consolidation in the supermarket industry has led to fewer, but bigger buyers. From time to time,
sales are transacted via e-commerce. We believe that our largest customers will require us and our
competitors to implement one or more e-commerce distribution solutions to facilitate their
procurement and inventory management programs. In our judgment, the shift to e-commerce by our
largest customers will favorably impact larger handlers like us, which have the ability and
financial resources to support these strategies. From time to time, some of our larger customers
seek short-term sales contracts that formalize their pricing and volume requirements. Generally,
these contracts contain provisions that establish a price floor and/or ceiling during the contract
duration. Again, in our judgment, the shift by our customers to drafting sales contracts benefits
large handlers like us, which have the ability to fulfill the terms of these contracts. During
fiscal year 2007, our 5 and 25 largest customers represented approximately 12% and 25% of our total
consolidated revenues. During fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 none of our customers represented
more than 10% of total consolidated revenues.
The Hass variety is the predominant avocado variety marketed on a worldwide basis. California
grown Hass avocados are available year-round, with peak production periods occurring between
February through September. Other varieties have a more limited picking season and generally
command a lower price. Approximately 2,300 California growers deliver avocados to us, generally
pursuant to a standard marketing agreement. Over the past several years, our share of the
California avocado crop has remained strong, with approximately 34% of the 2007 shipped California
avocado crop handled by us, based on data published by the
4
Table of Contents
California Avocado Commission. We attribute our solid foothold in the California industry
principally to the competitiveness of the per pound returns we pay and the communication and
service we maintain with our growers.
California avocados delivered to our packinghouses are graded, sized, packed, cooled and, at
times, ripened for delivery to customers. Our ability to estimate the size, as well as the timing
of the delivery of the annual avocado crop, has a substantial impact on both our costs and the
sales price we receive for the fruit. To that end, our field personnel maintain direct contact
with growers and farm managers and coordinate harvest plans. The feedback from our field-managers
is used by our sales department to prepare sales plans used by our direct sales force.
A significant portion of our costs are fixed. As a result, significant fluctuations in the
volume of avocados delivered have a considerable impact on the per pound packing costs of avocados
we handle. Generally, larger crops will result in a lower per pound handling cost. We believe
that our cost structure is geared to optimally handle larger avocado crops. Our strategy calls for
continued efforts in aggressively recruiting new growers, retaining existing growers, and procuring
a larger percentage of the California avocado crop.
California avocados delivered to us are grouped as a homogenous pool on a weekly basis based
on the variety, size, and grade. The proceeds we receive from the sale of each separate avocado
pool, net of a packing and marketing fee to cover our costs and a profit, are paid back to the
growers once each month. This fee is a fixed rate per pound and is set annually by the Board of
Directors. The packing and marketing fee we withhold is periodically determined and revised based
on our estimated per pound packing and operating costs, as well as our operating profit.
Significant competitive pressures dictate that we set the packing and marketing fee at the lowest
possible level to attract new and retain existing grower business. We believe that, if net
proceeds paid ceased to be competitive, growers would choose to deliver their avocados to alternate
competitive handlers. Consequently, we strive to deliver growers the highest return possible on
avocados delivered to our packinghouses.
The California avocado market is highly competitive with 9 major avocado handlers. A
marketing order enacted by the state legislature is in effect for California grown avocados and
provides the financial resource to fund generic advertising and promotional programs. Avocados
handled by us are identifiable through packaging and the Calavo brand name sticker.
We leverage our expertise in the handling and marketing of California avocados to our
non-California sourced avocados and perishable food products. Non-California sourced avocados
primarily include fruit imported from Mexico and Chile. We believe that the sales generated from
these sources complement our offering of California avocados to our customers and stabilize the
supply of avocados during seasons of low California production. This was especially evident in
fiscal 2007, as a cyclically low California crop, coupled with freezing weather, resulted in an
unusually small California avocado crop. As a result, we supplemented our avocado demand via
increased deliveries from Mexico and Chile.
We handle some of these imported avocados on a consignment basis for the suppliers. Pursuant
to these arrangements, from time to time, we make advances to Mexican growers and Chilean packers.
Historically, we made such advances related to both pre-harvest and post-harvest activities, but
our focus during fiscal 2007 was primarily related to post-harvest activities. Typically, we
obtain collateral (i.e. fruit, fixed assets, etc.) that approximates the value at risk, prior to
making such advances. Historical experience demonstrates that providing post-harvest advances
results in our acquiring full market risk for the product, as it is possible (although unlikely)
that our resale proceeds may be less than the amounts we paid to the grower. This is a result of
the high level of volatility inherent in the avocado and perishable food markets, which are subject
to significant pricing declines based on the availability of fruit in the market. In the event
that we do make a pre-season advance, our ability to recover such pre-harvest advance would be
largely dependent on the growers ability to deliver avocados to us, as well as the inherent risks
of farming, such as weather and pests. We anticipate making moderate pre-season advances during
fiscal 2008.
Net sales generated by non-California sourced avocados depend principally on the availability
of Mexican and Chilean grown avocados in the U.S. markets. In November 2004, the United States
Department of Food and Agriculture (USDA) published a rule allowing Hass avocado imports from
Mexico into all 50 states year round (up from 31 states for only a six month period), except for
California, Florida, and Hawaii. The restriction on such states was lifted in February 2007. For
the remaining 47 states, however, Mexico was able to deliver its fruit for all of fiscal 2007, 2006
and 2005. The implementation of this rule did not result in a significant increase in the sale of
Mexican sourced fruit during fiscal 2007, as compared to fiscal 2006. See Item 7 for further
details.
In 1998, we invested in the Mexican avocado market by building a packinghouse in Uruapan,
Mexico. We believe that our continued success in marketing Mexican avocados is largely dependent
upon securing a reliable, high-quality supply of avocados at reasonable prices. The Mexican
avocado harvest is both complimentary and competitive with the California market, as the Mexican
harvest typically runs from September to June. As a result, it is common for Mexican growers to
monitor the supply of avocados for export to the United States in order to obtain higher field
prices. During 2007, we packed and distributed approximately 25% of the
5
Table of Contents
avocados exported from Mexico into the United States and approximately 7% of the avocados
exported from Mexico to countries other than the United States, based on our estimates.
In recent years, the volume of avocados exported by Chilean growers to the United States has
continued to increase. Chilean growers continue to increase/monitor avocado plantings to
capitalize on returns available in the worldwide avocado markets. Sales of Chilean grown avocados
have generally been significant during our 4th and 1st fiscal quarters.
Additionally, with the Chilean harvesting season being complimentary to the California season
(August through February), Chilean avocados are able to command competitive retail pricing in the
market. During 2007, we distributed approximately 7% of the Chilean imports into the United
States, based on our estimates.
We have developed a series of marketing and sales initiatives primarily aimed at our largest
customers that are designed to differentiate our products and services from those offered by our
competitors. Some of these key initiatives are as follows:
| We continue to have success with our ProRipeVIP avocado ripening program. This proprietary program allows us to deliver avocados evenly ripened to our customers specifications. We have invested in the Aweta AFS (acoustic firmness sensor) technology and equipment. ProRipeVIP is the next generation of selling conditioned avocados that have firmness determined via soundwaves. This technology is new to avocados. The most significant and compelling reason we invested in the Aweta systems is because the acoustic sensors measure firmness of the entire piece of fruit, as opposed to competitive mechanical tests that use pressure and calculated averages to measure firmness. We believe that ripened avocados help our customers address the consumers immediate needs and accelerate the sale of avocados through their stores. We currently have three Aweta systems in use in the United States, which, we believe, can effectively meet our customers demand for conditioned fruit. | ||
| We have developed various display techniques and packages that appeal to consumers and, in particular, impulse buyers. Some of our techniques include the bagging of avocados and the strategic display of the bags within the produce section of retail stores. Our research has demonstrated that consumers generally purchase a larger quantity of avocados when presented in a bag as opposed to the conventional bulk displays. We also believe that the value proposition of avocados in a bag provides for a higher level of sales to grocery stores. | ||
| From time to time, we market our avocados under joint promotion programs with other food manufacturers. Under these programs, we seek to increase the promotional exposure of our products by providing certain sales incentives. These incentives will be offered in conjunction with various promotional campaigns designed to advertise the products of all parties involved. We believe these programs will help us minimize our advertising costs, as they will be shared with other parties, while still achieving recognition in the marketplace. |
Our distribution of other perishable food products had generally been limited
to papayas procured from a Hawaiian packing operation, which is owned by the Chairman of our Board
of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President. The acquisition of Maui, however, expanded
our perishable food products to include various commodities, including tomatoes, mushrooms, onions,
coconuts, and pineapples. We leverage our expertise in the handling and marketing of California
avocados to these perishable food products as well. While most of these items are purchased, the
majority of our sales is generated from papayas and tomatoes, both of which are handled on a
consigned basis, with commission rates ranging from 8%-12%. Sales of our diversified products does
not generally experience significant fluctuations related to seasonality.
Processed Products
The processed product segment was originally conceived as a mechanism to stabilize the price
of California avocados by reducing the volume of avocados available to the marketplace. In the
1960s and early 1970s, we pioneered the process of freezing avocado pulp and developed a wide
variety of guacamole recipes to address the diverse tastes of consumers and buyers in both the
retail and food service industries. One of the key benefits of frozen products is its long
shelf-life. With the introduction of low cost processed products delivered from Mexican based
processors, however, we realigned the segments strategy by shifting the fruit procurement and pulp
processing functions to Mexico. In 1995, we invested in a processing plant in Mexicali, Mexico to
derive the benefit of competitive avocado prices available in Mexico.
Through January 2003, the primary function of our Mexicali processed operation was to produce
pulp for our Santa Paula plant. Our processing facility in Santa Paula, California would receive
the pulp from Mexicali, add ingredients, and package the product in
various containers. The product would then be frozen for storage with shipment to warehouses and,
ultimately, to our customers. From January 2003 to August 2004, however, our Mexicali processed
operations became primarily focused on our individually quick frozen (IQF) avocado half product
line and one of our ultra high-pressure lines. Our IQF line provides food service and retail
6
Table of Contents
customers with peeled avocado halves that are ripe and suitable for immediate consumption. These
halves were frozen, packaged and shipped out of Mexicali to warehouses located in the U.S., and,
ultimately, to our customers.
In February 2003, our Board of Directors approved a plan whereby the operations of our
processed products business would be relocated. The plan called for the closing of our Santa
Paula, California and Mexicali, Baja California Norte (Mexicali) processing facilities and
relocating these operations to a new facility in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico (Uruapan). This
restructuring has provided for cost savings in the elimination of certain transportation costs,
duplicative overhead structures, and savings in the overall cost of labor and services. The
Uruapan facility commenced operations in February 2004 and the Santa Paula and Mexicali facilities
ceased production in February 2003 and August 2004. Net sales of frozen products represented
approximately 63% and 62% of total processed segment sales for the years ended October 31, 2007 and
2006.
During fiscal year
2002, we purchased and commissioned a 35-liter (35L) ultra high pressure machine
designed to cold pasteurize fresh guacamole. Utilizing ultra high pressure only and without the
need of any additives or preservatives, this procedure substantially destroys the cells of any
bacteria that could lead to spoilage or oxidation issues. Once the procedure is completed, our
guacamole is cased and shipped to various retail and food service customers throughout the United
States and Canada.
Our 35L machine discussed above ran near capacity during fiscal year 2003 through the closure
date of Mexicali, which was August 2004. During fiscal year 2004, we purchased and commissioned a
215-liter (215L) ultra high pressure machine in Uruapan. This machine was commissioned for operations in July
2004, ran at about 40% capacity during fiscal 2004, increased to approximately 60% capacity during
fiscal 2005, and ran at about 80% capacity during fiscal years 2006 and 2007. The 35L machine
discussed above was ultimately traded in for credit towards another 215L machine, which was
commissioned for operation in September 2007. As such, we currently have two 215L ultra high
pressure machines located in Uruapan and estimate we are operating at approximately 42% of the
combined machines capacities as of October 31, 2007. We believe the additional capacity provided
by the 2nd machine is reasonable given our current sales projections and expected
growth. Net sales of our ultra high pressure products represented approximately 37% and 38% of
total processed segment sales for the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006.
Sales are made principally through a commissioned nationwide broker network, which is
supported by our regional sales managers. We believe that our marketing strength is distinguished
by providing quality products, innovation, year-round product availability, strategically located
warehouses, and market relationships. During fiscal year 2007, our 5 and 25 largest customers
represented approximately 7% and 12% of our total consolidated revenues. During fiscal years 2007,
2006 and 2005 none of our processed product customers represented more than 10% of total
consolidated revenues.
We believe that these ultra high pressure machines will enable our company to deliver the
widest available array of prepared avocado and other products to our customers. Consequently, we
believe that we are positioned to expand our ultra high pressure product line to include more
avocado related products, high-end salsas, mangoes and other readily available fruit products.
Sales and Other Financial Information by Business Segment and Product Category
Sales and other financial information by business segment are provided in Note 11 to our
consolidated financial statements that are included in this Annual Report.
Patents and Trademarks
Our trademarks include the Calavo brand name and related logos. We also utilize the following
trademarks in conducting our business: Avo Fresco, Bueno, Calavo Gold, Celebrate the Taste, El
Dorado, Fresh Ripe, Select, Taste of Paradise, The First Name in Avocados, Tico, Mfresh, and
Triggered Avocados, and ProRipeVIP.
Working Capital Requirements
Generally, we make payments to our California avocado growers and other suppliers in advance
of collecting all of the related accounts receivable. We generally bridge the timing between
vendor payments and customer receipts by using operating cash flows and commercial bank borrowings.
In addition, we provide crop loans and other advances to some of our growers, which are also
funded through operating cash flows and borrowings. We generally experience larger levels of
commercial bank borrowings during the California Hass avocado crop harvesting season.
Non-California sourced avocados and perishable food products often require working capital to
finance the payment of advances to suppliers and collection of accounts receivable. These working
capital needs are also financed through the use of operating cash flows and bank borrowings.
7
Table of Contents
With respect to our processed products business, we require working capital to finance the
production of our processed avocado products, building and maintaining an adequate supply of
finished product, and collecting our accounts receivable balances. These working capital needs are
financed through the use of operating cash flows and bank borrowings.
Backlog
Our customers do not place product orders significantly in advance of the requested product
delivery dates. Customers typically order perishable products two to ten days in advance of
shipment, and typically order processed products within thirty days in advance of shipment.
Research and Development
We do not undertake significant research and development efforts. Research and development
programs, if any, are limited to the continuous process of refining and developing new techniques
to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of our processed products operations and the handling,
ripening, storage, and packing of fresh avocados.
Compliance with Government Regulations
The California State Department of Food and Agriculture oversees the packing and processing of
California avocados and conducts tests for fruit quality and packaging standards. All of our
packages are stamped with the state seal as meeting standards. Various states have instituted
regulations providing differing levels of oversight with respect to weights and measures, as well
as quality standards.
As a manufacturer and marketer of processed avocado products, our operations are subject to
extensive regulation by various federal government agencies, including the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), the USDA and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), as well as state and local
agencies, with respect to production processes, product attributes, packaging, labeling, storage
and distribution. Under various statutes and regulations, these agencies prescribe requirements and
establish standards for safety, purity and labeling. In addition, advertising of our products is
subject to regulation by the FTC, and our operations are subject to certain health and safety
regulations, including those issued under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Our
manufacturing facilities and products are subject to periodic inspection by federal, state and
local authorities.
As a result of our agricultural and food processing activities, we are subject to numerous
environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations govern the treatment, handling,
storage and disposal of materials and waste and the remediation of contaminated properties.
We seek to comply at all times with all such laws and regulations and to obtain any necessary
permits and licenses, and we are not aware of any instances of material non-compliance. We believe
our facilities and practices are sufficient to maintain compliance with applicable governmental
laws, regulations, permits and licenses. Nevertheless, there is no guarantee that we will be able
to comply with any future laws and regulations or requirements for necessary permits and licenses.
Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations or obtain any necessary permits and
licenses could subject us to civil remedies including fines, injunctions, recalls or seizures, as
well as potential criminal sanctions.
Employees
As of October 31, 2007, we had approximately 830 employees, of which approximately 200 were
located in the United States and 630 were located in Mexico. None of Calavos United States
employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Approximately 520 of Calavos Mexican
employees are represented by a union. We consider the relationship with our employees to be good
and we have never experienced a significant work stoppage.
The following is a summary of the number of salaried and hourly employees as of October
31, 2007.
Location | Salaried | Hourly | ||||||
United States |
91 | 107 | ||||||
Mexico |
109 | 521 | ||||||
TOTAL |
200 | 628 | ||||||
8
Table of Contents
Although agriculture is a seasonal industry, avocados have a wider window of production than
most perishable commodities. Consequently, we employ hourly personnel more routinely throughout the
year when compared to other agriculture-dependent companies.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Business
We are subject to increasing competition that may adversely affect our operating results.
The market for avocados and processed avocado products is highly competitive and affects each
of our businesses. Each of our businesses are subject to competitive pressures, including the
following:
| California avocados are impacted by an increasing volume of foreign grown avocados being imported into the United States. Recently, there have been significant plantings of avocados in Mexico, Chile, New Zealand, the Dominican Republic, Peru and other parts of the world, which have had, and will continue to have, the effect of increasing the volume of foreign grown avocados entering the United States market. Generally, an increase in foreign grown avocados in the markets we distribute in has the effect of lowering prices for California grown avocados and adversely impacting our results from operations. | ||
| California avocados are subject to competition from other California avocado handlers. If we are unable to consistently pay California growers a competitive price for their avocados, these growers may choose to have their avocados marketed by alternate handlers. | ||
| Non-California sourced avocados and perishable food products are impacted by competitors operating in Mexico. Generally, handlers of Mexican grown avocados operate facilities that are substantially smaller than our facility in Uruapan, Mexico. If we are unable to pack and market a sufficient volume of Mexican grown avocados, smaller handlers will have a lower per unit cost and be able to offer Mexican avocados at a more competitive price to our customers. | ||
| Non-California sourced avocados and perishable food products are also subject to competition from other California avocado handlers that market Chilean grown avocados. If we are unable to consistently pay Chilean packers a competitive price for their avocados, these packers may choose to have their avocados marketed by alternate handlers. |
We are subject to the risks of doing business internationally.
We conduct a substantial amount of business with growers and customers who are located outside
the United States. We purchase avocados from foreign growers and packers, sell fresh avocados and
processed avocado products to foreign customers, and operate a packinghouse and a processing plant
in Mexico. For additional information about our non-California sourced fruit, see the Business
section included in this Annual Report.
Our current international operations are subject to a number of inherent risks, including:
| Local economic and political conditions, including disruptions in trading and capital markets; | ||
| Restrictive foreign governmental actions, such as restrictions on transfers of funds and trade protection measures, including export duties and quotas and customs duties and tariffs; | ||
| Changes in legal or regulatory requirements affecting foreign investment, loans, taxes, imports, and exports; and | ||
| Currency exchange rate fluctuations which, depending upon the nature of the changes, may make our domestic-sourced products more expensive compared to foreign grown products or may increase our cost of obtaining foreign-sourced products. |
We and our growers are subject to the risks that are inherent in farming.
Our results of operations may be adversely affected by numerous factors over which we have
little or no control and that are inherent in farming, including reductions in the market prices
for our products, adverse weather and growing conditions, pest and disease problems, and new
government regulations regarding farming and the marketing of agricultural products.
We are subject to rapidly changing USDA and FDA regulations which govern the importation of foreign
avocados into the United States and the processing of processed avocado products.
The USDA has established, and continues to modify, regulations governing the importation of
avocados into the United States. Our permits that allow us to import foreign-sourced avocados into
the United States generally are contingent on our compliance with these regulations. Our results
of operations may be adversely affected if we are unable to comply with existing and modified
regulations and are unable to secure avocado import permits in the future.
9
Table of Contents
The FDA establishes, and continues to modify, regulations governing the production of
processed avocado products. Our results of operations may be adversely affected if we are unable
to comply with existing and modified regulations.
Our business could be adversely affected if we lost key members of our management.
We are dependent on the efforts and performance of our current directors and officers. If we
were to lose any key members of management, our business could be adversely affected. You should
read the information under Executive Officers in this Annual Report for additional information
about our management.
The acquisition of other businesses could pose risks to our operating income.
We intend to review acquisition prospects that would complement our business. While we are
not currently a party to any agreement with respect to any acquisitions, we may acquire other
businesses in the future. Future acquisitions by us could result in accounting charges,
potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, and increased debt and contingent liabilities,
any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and the market price of our
common stock. Acquisitions entail numerous risks, including the assimilation of the acquired
operations, diversion of managements attention to other business concerns, risks of entering
markets in which we have limited prior experience, and the potential loss of key employees of
acquired organizations. We may be unable to successfully integrate businesses or the personnel of
any business that might be acquired in the future, and our failure to do so could have a material
adverse effect on our business and on the market price of our common stock.
Our ability to competitively serve our customers is a function of reliable and low cost
transportation. Disruption of the supply of these services and/or significant increases in the cost
of these services could impact our operating income.
We use multiple forms of transportation to bring our products to market. They include ocean,
truck, and air-cargo. Disruption to the timely supply of these services or dramatic increases in
the cost of these services for any reason including availability of fuel for such services, labor
disputes, or governmental restrictions limiting specific forms of transportation could have an
adverse effect on our ability to serve our customers and consumers and could have an adverse effect
on our financial performance.
The value of our common stock may be adversely affected by market volatility.
The trading price of our common stock fluctuates and may be influenced by many factors, including:
| Our operating and financial performance and prospects; | ||
| The depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock; | ||
| Investor perception of us and the industry and markets in which we operate; | ||
| Our inclusion in, or removal from, any equity market indices; | ||
| Changes in earnings estimates or buy/sell recommendations by analysts; and | ||
| General financial, domestic, international, economic and other market conditions; |
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
We lease our corporate headquarters building. Additionally, we own two packinghouses and one
distribution and ripening facility (our former processing facility) in California, lease one
facility in Arizona, lease one facility in New Jersey, operate in a distribution center in Texas,
own one processing facility in Mexico, and lease one packinghouse in Mexico.
In March 2005, we completed the sale of our corporate headquarters building (located in Santa
Ana, CA) for $3.4 million. In conjunction with such sale, we relocated our corporate offices to
Santa Paula, California in March 2005. We currently lease our corporate headquarters from
Limoneira.
Our two California facilities handle avocados delivered to us by California, Mexican and
Chilean growers. The Temecula, California facility was built in 1985 and has been improved in
capacity and efficiency since then. The Santa Paula, California facility was purchased in 1955 and
has had recent equipment improvements equivalent to our Temecula facility. We believe that the
combined annual capacity of the two packinghouses, under normal workweek operations, is sufficient
to pack the annually budgeted volume of California avocados delivered to us by our growers.
10
Table of Contents
Our Santa Paula, California processing facility was built in 1975 and had a major expansion in
1988. In conjunction with our restructuring plan, which was approved in February 2003, this
facility ceased operating as a processed product avocado processing facility and now functions
primarily as a ripening, storage and shipping facility for our fresh avocado operation.
Additionally, it also serves to store certain processed avocado products as well. Also, effective
December 2005, we sort and pack certain tropical commodities as well. We believe that the annual
capacity of this facility will be sufficient to pack and ripen, if necessary, the expected annual
volume of avocados and specialty commodities delivered to us.
Our leased Nogales, Arizona facility primarily sorts, packs, ripens, and ships, tomatoes,
avocados, and other tropical commodities as well. We believe that the annual capacity of this
facility will be sufficient to handle our budgeted annual production needs.
Our leased Swedesboro, New Jersey facility primarily sorts, packs, ripens, and ships avocados.
We believe that the annual capacity of this facility will be sufficient to handle our budgeted
annual production needs.
Our distribution center located in San Antonio, Texas is neither leased nor owned, but rather
operates pursuant to a usage agreement whereby we pay handling and distribution fees. This
facility primarily ripens, sorts, packs and ships fresh avocados under our supervision. We believe
that the annual capacity of this facility will be sufficient to handle our budgeted annual
production needs.
Our owned processing facility in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico was constructed pursuant to our
restructuring plan approved in February 2003. This facility commenced operations in February 2004.
We believe that the annual capacity of this facility will be sufficient to process our budgeted
annual production needs.
Our Uruapan, Mexico fresh avocado packinghouse, owned by the same landlord as our former
Mexicali facility, was built to our specifications. We are committed to leasing the facility
through 2008 and have the option to purchase such facility at the end of the lease term. We
believe that the annual capacity of this facility will be sufficient to process our budgeted annual
production needs.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we become involved in legal proceedings that are related to our business
operations. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings that could have a material
adverse effect upon our financial position or results of operations.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the quarter ended October 31,
2007.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of individuals who hold positions as
executive officers of our company. There are no family relationships between any director or
executive officer and any other director or executive officer of our company. Executive officers
are elected by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board.
Name | Age | Position | ||||
Lecil E. Cole
|
68 | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President | ||||
Arthur J. Bruno
|
57 | Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary | ||||
Robert J. Wedin
|
58 | Vice President, Sales and Fresh Marketing | ||||
Alan C. Ahmer
|
59 | Vice President, Processed Product Sales and Production | ||||
Michael A. Browne
|
49 | Vice President, Fresh Operations |
Lecil E. Cole has been a member of our board of directors since February 1982 and has served
as Chairman of the Board since 1988. Mr. Cole has also served as our Chief Executive Officer and
President since February 1999. He served as an executive of Safeway Stores from 1964 to 1976 and
as Chairman of Central Coast Federal Land Bank from 1986 to 1996. Mr. Cole has served as Chairman
and President of Hawaiian Sweet, Inc. and Tropical Hawaiian Products, Inc. since 1996. Mr. Cole
farms approximately 4,400 acres in California and Hawaii on which avocados, papayas, and cattle are
produced and raised.
Arthur J. Bruno has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary since
October 2003. During fiscal 2004, Mr. Bruno also assumed the title and responsibilities of Chief
Operating Officer. From 1988 to 2003, Mr. Bruno served as the president and co-founder of Maui
Fresh International, Inc. Mr. Bruno is a Certified Public Accountant.
11
Table of Contents
Robert J. Wedin has served as our Vice President since 1993. Mr. Wedin joined us in 1973 at
our then Santa Barbara packinghouse. Beginning in 1990, Mr. Wedin served as a director of the
California Avocado Commission for a period of ten years. Mr. Wedin currently is a board member of
Producesupply.org and serves as a member of that organizations executive committee.
Alan C. Ahmer has served as our Vice President since 1989. Mr. Ahmer joined us in 1979 as a
regional sales manager in our processed products business. In September 2003, Mr. Ahmers new
title became Vice-President, Processed Products Sales and Production.
Michael A. Browne has served as our Vice President since 2005. From 1997 until joining us,
Mr. Browne served as the founder and co-owner of Fresh Directions International, a closely held
multinational fresh produce company, which marketed fresh avocados from Mexico, Chile, and the
Dominican Republic. Mr. Browne joined us in May 2005.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
In March 2002, our common stock began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol
CVGW. In July 2002, our common stock began trading on the Nasdaq National Market under the
symbol CVGW. and currently trades on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market. The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per
share of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market.
Fiscal 2007 | High | Low | ||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 11.67 | $ | 9.61 | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 14.09 | $ | 10.50 | ||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 14.52 | $ | 11.85 | ||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 22.91 | $ | 14.45 |
Fiscal 2006 | High | Low | ||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 10.50 | $ | 9.59 | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 11.00 | $ | 9.51 | ||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 11.94 | $ | 9.37 | ||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 10.24 | $ | 9.04 |
As of October 31, 2007, there were approximately 1,300 stockholders of record of our common
stock.
During the year ended October 31, 2007, we did not issue any shares of common stock that were
not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
Dividend Policy
Our dividend policy is to provide for an annual dividend payment, as determined by the Board
of Directors. We anticipate that dividends will be paid in the first quarter of our fiscal year.
On January 2, 2008, we paid a $0.35 per share dividend in the aggregate amount of $5,030,000
to shareholders of record on December 15, 2007.
On January 3, 2007, we paid a $0.32 per share dividend in the aggregate amount of $4,573,000
to shareholders of record on December 15, 2006.
12
Table of Contents
Shareowner Return Performance Graph
The following graph compares the performance of our common stock with the performance of the
Nasdaq Market Index and the Hemscott Group Index for approximately the 67.5-month period beginning
on March 22, 2002 and ending October 31, 2007. In making this comparison, we have assumed an
investment of $100 in Calavo Growers, Inc. common stock, the Nasdaq Market Index, and the Hemscott
Group Index as of March 22, 2002, the first day that our common shares began trading on the OTC
Bulletin Board. Since July 23, 2002, our shares have traded on the Nasdaq National Market and then the Nasdaq Global Select Market. We
have also assumed the reinvestment of all dividends. The Hemscott Group Index is a composition of
major diversified food companies.
COMPARE CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG CALAVO GROWERS, INC.,
NASDAQ MARKET INDEX AND HEMSCOTT GROUP INDEX
AMONG CALAVO GROWERS, INC.,
NASDAQ MARKET INDEX AND HEMSCOTT GROUP INDEX
ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON OCT. 31, 2002
ASSUMES DIVIDEND REINVESTED
FISCAL YEAR ENDING OCT. 31, 2007
ASSUMES DIVIDEND REINVESTED
FISCAL YEAR ENDING OCT. 31, 2007
13
Table of Contents
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following summary consolidated financial data (other than pounds information) for each of
the years in the five-year period ended October 31, 2007 are derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements of Calavo Growers, Inc.
Historical results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected in any
future period. The following data should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Fiscal Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data: (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 302,984 | $ | 273,723 | $ | 258,822 | $ | 274,218 | $ | 246,761 | ||||||||||
Gross margin |
31,772 | 29,084 | 21,734 | 25,404 | 25,465 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
7,330 | 5,788 | 3,322 | 6,210 | 7,160 | |||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted net income per share |
$ | 0.51 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.55 | ||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data as of End of
Period: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Working capital |
$ | 16,334 | $ | 12,023 | $ | 17,618 | $ | 20,353 | $ | 20,735 | ||||||||||
Total assets(4) |
128,018 | 107,563 | 108,482 | 67,398 | 53,689 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term debt(4) |
1,307 | 1,308 | 1,313 | 22 | 24 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion(2)(4) |
13,106 | 10,406 | 11,719 | 34 | 61 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity(4) |
74,003 | 58,943 | 64,746 | 43,937 | 37,147 | |||||||||||||||
Cash Flows Provided by (Used in): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations |
$ | 4,629 | $ | 7,819 | $ | 5,568 | $ | 4,460 | $ | 15,222 | ||||||||||
Investing(3)(4)(5) |
(7,950 | ) | (4,663 | ) | (11,941 | ) | (8,474 | ) | (4,475 | ) | ||||||||||
Financing(4) |
4,238 | (4,239 | ) | 6,870 | (725 | ) | (6,293 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends per share |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.25 | ||||||||||
Net book value per share |
$ | 5.15 | $ | 4.12 | $ | 4.51 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 2.87 | ||||||||||
Pounds of California avocados sold |
91,038 | 218,460 | 104,950 | 152,725 | 122,950 | |||||||||||||||
Pounds of non-California avocados sold |
135,723 | 70,063 | 103,830 | 69,410 | 70,348 | |||||||||||||||
Pounds of processed avocados products sold |
22,556 | 20,489 | 15,628 | 13,317 | 14,707 |
(1) | Operating results for fiscal years 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004 include the acquisition of Maui Fresh International, Inc. For fiscal years 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004, Mauis net sales, gross margins, and net income were as follows: (2007) $29.5 million, $2.1 million, and $0.6 million, (2006) $22.1 million, $1.4 million, and $0.2 million, (2005) $21.7 million, $1.1 million, and $0.4 million, and (2004) $19.8 million, $1.4 million, and $0.5 million. | |
(2) | In July 2003, our Board of Directors approved the retirement of our Industrial Development Revenue Bond. The bonds were initially floated to provide the financing to construct our Temecula, California packinghouse. We repaid the final $2.8 million in principal under the indenture in September 2003. | |
(3) | Cash flows used in investing activities for fiscal 2004 and 2003 include the effect of constructing a processing facility in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico. The Uruapan facility commenced operations in February 2004. | |
(4) | Total assets, short-term debt, long-term debt, equity, cash flows used in investing activities, and cash flows provided by financing activities for fiscal 2005 include the effect of the stock purchase agreement with Limoneira Company. | |
(5) | During the second and third quarters of fiscal 2007, we advanced $5 million to Agricola Belher pursuant to our distribution and infrastructure agreements. See Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements. |
14
Table of Contents
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results
of operations together with Selected Consolidated Financial Data and our consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion and
analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions.
Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as
a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, those presented under Risks related to
our business included in Item 1A and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Overview
We are a leader in the distribution of avocados, prepared avocado products, and other
perishable food products throughout the United States and elsewhere in the world. Our history and
expertise in handling California grown avocados has allowed us to develop a reputation of
delivering quality products, at competitive prices, while providing competitive returns to our
growers. This reputation has enabled us to expand our product offerings to include avocados
sourced on an international basis, prepared avocado products, and other perishable foods. We
report our operations in two different business segments: (1) fresh products and (2) processed
products. See Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion. We report
our financial results on a November 1 to October 31 fiscal year basis to coincide with the
California avocado harvest season.
On October 9, 2001, we completed a series of transactions whereby common and preferred
shareholders of Calavo Growers of California, an agricultural marketing cooperative association,
exchanged all of their outstanding shares for shares of our common stock. Concurrently with this
transaction, the Cooperative was merged into us with Calavo emerging as the surviving entity.
These transactions had the effect of converting the legal structure of the business from a
non-profit cooperative to a for-profit corporation. The merger and the conversion were approved on
an overwhelming basis by both the Cooperatives shareholders and our board of directors. Prior to
the merger, the Cooperative reported results of operations as constituting either member (the
packing and distribution of avocados procured from either members or associate members) or
non-member business (non-member business included both the processed product business and the
sourcing and distribution of all crops that were not procured from the Cooperatives members).
Our Fresh Products business grades, sizes, packs, cools, and ripens (if desired) avocados
grown in California for delivery to our customers. We presently operate three packinghouses in
Southern California. These packinghouses handled approximately 34% of the California avocado crop
during the 2007 fiscal year, based on data obtained from the California Avocado Commission. Our
operating results and the returns we pay our growers are highly dependent on the volume of avocados
delivered to our packinghouses, as a significant portion of our costs are fixed. Our strategy
calls for continued efforts to retain and recruit growers that meet our business model.
Additionally, our Fresh products business also procures avocados grown in Mexico and Chile, as
well as other various commodities, including tomatoes, papayas, mushrooms, onions, coconuts, and
pineapples. We operate a packinghouse in Mexico that, together with certain co-packers that we
frequently purchase fruit from, handled approximately 25% of the Mexican avocado crop bound for the
United States market and approximately 7% of the avocados exported from Mexico to countries other
than the United States during the 2006-2007 Mexican season, based on our estimates. Additionally,
during the 2006-2007 Chilean avocado season, we handled approximately 7% of the Chilean avocado
crop, based on our estimates. Our strategy is to procure and sell non-Californian grown avocados
to complement our distribution efforts of California grown avocados. We believe that the
introduction of these avocados, although competitive at times with California grown avocados,
provides a level of supply stability that may, over time, help solidify the demand for avocados
among consumers in the United States and elsewhere in the world. We believe our efforts in
distributing our other various commodities, such as those shown above, complement our offerings of
avocados. From time to time, we continue to explore distribution of other crops that provide
reasonable returns to the business.
Our processed products business procures avocados, processes avocados into a wide variety of
guacamole products, and distributes the processed product to our customers. Customers include both
food service industry and retail businesses and our products primarily include both frozen and
cold pasteurized fresh guacamole. Cold pasteurized fresh guacamole refers to fresh guacamole
product that has been treated by one of our ultra high pressure machines. We currently have two
215-liter ultra high pressure machines located in Uruapan, Michoacán, Mexico (Uruapan). These machines
utilize ultra high pressure only (i.e. without additives or preservatives) and destroy the cells of
any bacteria that could lead to spoilage or oxidation issues.
Due to the long shelf-life of our frozen processed products and the purity of our ultra high
pressure guacamole, we believe that we are well positioned to address the diverse taste and needs
of todays customers. We believe our ultra high pressure machines will enable our company to
deliver the widest available array of prepared avocado and other products to our customers. We
also believe that we are positioned to expand our ultra high pressure product line to include more
avocado related products, high-end salsas,
15
Table of Contents
mangoes and other readily available fruit products. We continue to seek to expand our
relationships with major food service companies and develop alliances that will allow our products
to reach a larger percentage of the marketplace.
Net sales of frozen products represented approximately 63% and 62% of total processed segment
sales for the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006. Net sales of our ultra high pressure products
represented approximately 37% and 38% of total processed segment sales for the years ended October
31, 2007 and 2006.
Our Fresh Products business is highly seasonal and is characterized by crop volume and price
changes. Furthermore, the operating results of all of our businesses, including our processed
products business, have been, and will continue to be, affected by substantial quarterly and annual
fluctuations and market downturns due to a number of factors, such as pests and disease, weather
patterns, changes in demand by consumers, the timing of the receipt, reduction, or cancellation of
significant customer orders, the gain or loss of significant customers, market acceptance of our
products, our ability to develop, introduce, and market new products on a timely basis,
availability and cost of avocados and supplies from growers and vendors, new product introductions
by our competitors, change in the mix of avocados and processed products we sell, and general
economic conditions. We believe, however, that we are currently positioned to address these risks
and deliver favorable operating results for the foreseeable future.
Recent Developments
Dividend Payment
On January 2, 2008, we paid a $0.35 per share dividend in the aggregate amount of $5.0 million
to shareholders of record on December 15, 2007.
Revolving Credit Facilities
In July 2007 and October 2007, we renewed and extended our non-collateralized, revolving
credit facilities with Farm Credit West, PCA and Bank of America, N.A. These two credit facilities
now expire in February 2012 and July 2009. Under the terms of these agreements, we are advanced
funds for both working capital and long-term productive asset purchases. Total credit available
under these combined borrowing agreements was $30 million, with a weighted-average interest rate of
5.8% and 6.2% at October 31, 2007 and 2006. Under these credit facilities, we had $10.6 million
and $3.8 million outstanding as of October 31, 2007 and 2006, of which $4.0 million was classified
as a long-term liability as of October 31, 2007. We had no long-term amounts outstanding pursuant
to these credit facilities as of October 31, 2006. These credit facilities contain various
financial covenants, the most significant relating to working capital, tangible net worth (as
defined), and Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) (as defined).
We were in compliance with all such covenants at October 31, 2007.
Agreements with Tomato Grower
In June 2007, we entered into a distribution agreement with Agricola Belher (Belher) of
Mexico, a well-established quality producer of fresh vegetables, primarily tomatoes, for export to
the U.S. market. Pursuant to such distribution agreement, Belher agreed, at their sole cost and
expense, to harvest, pack, export, ship, and deliver tomatoes exclusively to our Arizona facility.
In exchange, we agreed to sell and distribute such tomatoes, advance $2 million to Belher for
operating purposes, provide additional advances as shipments are made during the season (subject to
limitations, as defined), and return the proceeds from such tomato sales to Belher, net of our
commission and aforementioned advances. The agreement also allows for us to advance additional
amounts to Belher at our sole discretion. All advances that remain outstanding as of June 2008 are
immediately due and payable. As of October 31, 2007, we have advanced $2 million to Belher
pursuant to this agreement.
Concurrently, we also entered into an infrastructure agreement in June 2007 with Belher in
order to significantly increase production yields and fruit quality. Pursuant to this agreement,
we are to advance up to $5 million to be used solely for the acquisition, construction, and
installation of improvements to and on certain land owned by Belher, as well as packing line
equipment. Advances incur interest at 9.4% at October 31, 2007. We advanced $5.0 million as of
October 31, 2007 ($1.0 million included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and
$4.0 million included in other long-term assets). Belher is to annually repay these advances in no
less than 20% increments through July 2012. In addition, the agreement allows for
additional $1.0 million advances to take place during
the last five months of each of our fiscal years 2008 through 2010, but they are subject to certain
conditions and are to be made at our sole discretion. Belher is to annually repay these advances
in full on or before
each of July 2008 through July 2010. Interest is to be paid monthly or annually, as defined.
Belher may prepay, without penalty, all or any portion of the advances at any time.
In order to secure their obligations pursuant to both agreements discussed above, Belher
granted us a first-priority security interest in certain assets, including cash, inventory and
fixed assets, as defined.
16
Table of Contents
Agreement with Mushroom Grower
Effective November 2007, we entered into a consignment and marketing agreement with Farmers
Fresh Mushroom, Inc (FFMI) to market and sell conventional and organic mushrooms in the United
States. FFMI agreed, among other things, to source, pack, and ship product primarily to our
customers, but also to any of our distribution centers, at our option. In exchange, we agreed,
among other things, to market and sell such product. The agreement specifically calls for FFMI to
not actively pursue new business in the United States of America and it also requires that all
product sold by us will be packed in our cartons and sold only by us.
The term of this agreement is for 12 months (through October 2008) and automatically renews
for a 12-month period on the final day of the agreement, unless terminated, as defined.
Agreement with Pineapple Grower
Effective December 2007, we entered into a consignment and marketing agreement with Maui
Pineapple Company, LTD. (MPC), to market and sell Maui Gold Pineapples throughout the continental
United States and Canada. MPC agreed, among other things, to source, pack and ship such pineapples
to an agreed port of entry. In exchange, we agreed, among other things, to be responsible for such
product upon arrival at the port, to market and sell the related product, and to develop and
implement marketing strategies aimed at building the Maui Gold brand recognition. The agreement
specifically calls for us to be the sole and exclusive source for the sale of Maui Gold Pineapples.
Additionally, Maui Gold Pineapples are to be our sole fresh pineapple product.
The agreement calls for us to provide certain advances, as defined, and return the proceeds from
such pineapple sales to MPC, net of our commission, fees, and incentives, if applicable. The term
of this agreement is for 13 months (through December 2008) and automatically renews for a 12-month
period, unless terminated, as defined.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based
upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we re-evaluate all of our estimates,
including those related to the areas of customer and grower receivables, inventories, useful lives
of property, plant and equipment, promotional allowances, income taxes, retirement benefits, and
commitments and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions as additional information becomes available in future
periods.
Management has discussed the development and selection of critical accounting estimates with
the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed our disclosure
relating to critical accounting estimates in this Annual Report.
We believe the following are the more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Promotional allowances. We provide for promotional allowances at the time of sale, based on
our historical experience. Our estimates are generally based on evaluating the relationship
between promotional allowances and gross sales. The derived percentage is then applied to the
current periods sales revenues in order to arrive at the appropriate debit to sales allowances for
the period. The offsetting credit is made to allowance for accounts receivable. When certain
amounts of specific customer accounts are subsequently identified as promotional, they are written
off against this allowance. Actual amounts may differ from these estimates and such differences
are recognized as an adjustment to net sales in the period they are identified.
Income Taxes. Our effective income tax rate and the tax bases of assets and liabilities are
based on estimates of taxes which will ultimately be payable. Deferred taxes are recorded to give
recognition to temporary differences between the tax bases of assets or liabilities and their
reported amounts in the financial statements. Valuation allowances are established when it is
deemed, more likely than not, that the benefit of deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Goodwill and acquired intangible assets. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis
and between annual tests whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable, in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an
operating segment or one level below the operating segment. Goodwill impairment testing is a
two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential
impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount,
17
Table of Contents
including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount,
goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired, and the second step of the impairment
test would be unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the
second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed to measure the amount of impairment
loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test, used to measure the amount of
impairment loss, compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying
amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss must be recognized in an amount equal to that
excess. Goodwill impairment testing requires significant judgment and management estimates,
including, but not limited to, the determination of (i) the number of reporting units, (ii) the
goodwill and other assets and liabilities to be allocated to the reporting units and (iii) the fair
values of the reporting units. The estimates and assumptions described above, along with other
factors such as discount rates, will significantly affect the outcome of the impairment tests and
the amounts of any resulting impairment losses. We performed our annual assessment of goodwill and
determined that no impairment existed as of October 31, 2007.
Allowance for accounts receivable. We provide an allowance for estimated uncollectible
accounts receivable balances based on historical experience and the aging of the related accounts
receivable. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an
impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain items from our consolidated statements of income,
expressed as percentages of our total net sales, for the periods indicated:
Year ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Gross margins |
10.5 | % | 10.6 | % | 8.4 | % | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
6.5 | % | 7.2 | % | 7.2 | % | ||||||
Operating income |
4.0 | % | 3.4 | % | 1.2 | % | ||||||
Interest Income |
0.1 | % | 0.1 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||||
Interest Expense |
(0.4 | )% | (0.3 | )% | (0.2 | )% | ||||||
Other income, net |
0.2 | % | 0.2 | % | 0.9 | % | ||||||
Net income |
2.4 | % | 2.1 | % | 1.3 | % |
Net Sales
We believe that the fundamentals for our products continue to be favorable. Firstly,
Americans are eating more avocados. Over the last 10 years, United States (U.S.) consumption of
avocados has expanded at a 9% compound annual growth rate and we do not anticipate this growth
significantly changing. We believe that the healthy eating trend that has been developing in the
United States contributes to such growth, as avocados, which are cholesterol and sodium free, are
dense in fiber, vitamin B6, antioxidants, potassium, folate, and contain unsaturated fat, which
help lower cholesterol. Also, a growing number of research studies seem to suggest that
phytonutrients, which avocados are rich in, help fight chronic illnesses, such as heart disease and
cancer.
Additionally, we believe that the demographic changes in the U.S. will greatly impact the
consumption of avocados and avocado-based products. The Hispanic community currently accounts for
approximately 14% of the U.S. population, and the total number of Hispanics is estimated to triple
by the year 2050. Avocados are considered a staple item purchased by Hispanic consumers, as the
per-capita avocado consumption in Mexico is estimated to be more than seven-fold that of the U.S.
We anticipate avocado products will further penetrate the United States marketplace driven by
growth in the Hispanic community and general acceptance in American cuisine. As the largest
marketer of avocado products in the United States, we believe that we are well positioned to
leverage this trend and to grow all segments of our business. Additionally, we also believe that
avocados and avocado based products will further penetrate other marketplaces that we currently
operate in, as interest in avocados continues to expand.
In October 2002, the USDA announced the creation of a Hass Avocado Board to promote the sale
of Hass variety avocados in the U.S. marketplace. This board provides a basis for a unified
funding of promotional activities based on an assessment on all avocados sold in the U.S.
marketplace, including imported and California grown fruit. The California Avocado Commission,
which receives its funding from California avocado growers, has historically shouldered the
promotional and advertising costs supporting avocado sales. We believe that the incremental
funding of promotional and advertising programs in the U.S. will, in the long term, positively
impact average selling prices and will favorably impact our California avocado and international
avocado businesses. During fiscal 2007,
18
Table of Contents
2006 and 2005, on behalf of avocado growers, we remitted approximately $1.7 million, $1.7
million and $1.5 million to the California Avocado Commission. During fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005,
we remitted approximately $2.2 million, $4.7 million and $2.4 million to the Hass Avocado Board
related to California avocados.
Sales of products and related costs of products sold are recognized when persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable and
collectability is reasonably assured. Service revenue, including freight, ripening, storage,
bagging and palletization charges, is recorded when services are performed and sales of the related
products are delivered. We provide for sales returns and promotional allowances at the time of
shipment, based on our experience. The following table summarizes our net sales by business
segment:
2007 | Change | 2006 | Change | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Fresh products |
$ | 261,325 | 10.3 | % | $ | 236,889 | 2.9 | % | $ | 230,289 | ||||||||||
Processed products |
41,659 | 13.1 | % | 36,834 | 29.1 | % | 28,533 | |||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 302,984 | 10.7 | % | $ | 273,723 | 5.8 | % | $ | 258,822 | ||||||||||
As a percentage of net sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Fresh products |
86.3 | % | 86.5 | % | 89.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Processed products |
13.7 | % | 13.5 | % | 11.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net sales for the year ended October 31, 2007, when compared to 2006, increased by
approximately $29.3 million, or 10.7%, principally as a result of an increase in both our fresh
products and processed products segments. The increase in sales related to our fresh products
segment was primarily driven by an increase in our average selling price, partially offset by a
decrease in the total pounds sold. The increase related to our processed products segment was
primarily related to an increase in both the total pounds sold, as well as an increase in the
average selling price per pound.
The following tables set forth sales by product category, freight and other charges and sales
incentives, by segment (dollars in thousands):
Year ended October 31, 2007 | Year ended October 31, 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fresh | Processed | Fresh | Processed | |||||||||||||||||||||
products | products | Total | products | products | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Third-party sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
California avocados |
$ | 95,130 | $ | | $ | 95,130 | $ | 140,995 | $ | | $ | 140,995 | ||||||||||||
Imported avocados |
120,588 | | 120,588 | 51,191 | | 51,191 | ||||||||||||||||||
Papayas |
5,887 | | 5,887 | 4,822 | | 4,822 | ||||||||||||||||||
Specialities and tropicals |
12,923 | | 12,923 | 9,543 | | 9,543 | ||||||||||||||||||
Processed food service |
| 38,338 | 38,338 | | 34,021 | 34,021 | ||||||||||||||||||
Processed retail and club |
| 10,706 | 10,706 | | 10,454 | 10,454 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total fruit and product sales
to third-parties |
234,528 | 49,044 | 283,572 | 206,551 | 44,475 | 251,026 | ||||||||||||||||||
Freight and other charges |
26,816 | 739 | 27,555 | 30,383 | 637 | 31,020 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total gross sales to third-parties |
261,344 | 49,783 | 311,127 | 236,934 | 45,112 | 282,046 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less sales incentives |
(19 | ) | (8,124 | ) | (8,143 | ) | (8 | ) | (8,278 | ) | (8,323 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total net sales to third-parties |
261,325 | 41,659 | 302,984 | 236,889 | 36,834 | 273,723 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany sales |
13,020 | 8,123 | 21,143 | 9,532 | 6,227 | 15,759 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 274,345 | $ | 49,782 | 324,127 | $ | 246,421 | $ | 43,061 | 289,482 | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany sales eliminations |
(21,143 | ) | (15,759 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated net sales |
$ | 302,984 | $ | 273,723 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended October 31, 2006 | Year ended October 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fresh | Processed | Fresh | Processed | |||||||||||||||||||||
products | products | Total | products | products | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Third-party sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
California avocados |
$ | 140,995 | $ | | $ | 140,995 | $ | 104,481 | $ | | $ | 104,481 | ||||||||||||
Imported avocados |
51,191 | | 51,191 | 81,756 | | 81,756 | ||||||||||||||||||
Papayas |
4,822 | | 4,822 | 6,251 | | 6,251 | ||||||||||||||||||
Specialities and tropicals |
9,543 | | 9,543 | 13,777 | | 13,777 | ||||||||||||||||||
Processed food service |
| 34,021 | 34,021 | | 28,307 | 28,307 | ||||||||||||||||||
Processed retail and club |
| 10,454 | 10,454 | | 6,766 | 6,766 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total fruit and product sales
to third-parties |
206,741 | 44,475 | 251,026 | 206,265 | 35,073 | 241,338 | ||||||||||||||||||
Freight and other charges |
30,156 | 637 | 31,020 | 24,129 | 258 | 24,387 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total gross sales to third-parties |
236,897 | 45,112 | 282,046 | 230,394 | 35,331 | 265,725 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less sales incentives |
(8 | ) | (8,278 | ) | (8,323 | ) | (105 | ) | (6,798 | ) | (6,903 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total net sales to third-parties |
236,889 | 36,834 | 273,723 | 230,289 | 28,533 | 258,822 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany sales |
9,532 | 6,227 | 15,759 | 15,850 | 6,166 | 22,016 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 246,421 | $ | 43,061 | 289,482 | $ | 246,139 | $ | 34,699 | 280,838 | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany sales eliminations |
(15,759 | ) | (22,016 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated net sales |
$ | 273,723 | $ | 258,822 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales to third parties by segment exclude value-added services billed by our Uruapan
packinghouse, Uruapan processing plant and Mexicali processing plant to the parent company. All
intercompany sales are eliminated in our consolidated results of operations.
19
Table of Contents
Fresh Products
Fiscal 2007 vs. Fiscal 2006:
Net sales delivered by the business increased by approximately $24.4 million, or 10.3%, from
fiscal 2006 to 2007. This increase was primarily related to an increase in Mexican and Chilean
avocado sales and an increase in tomato sales, partially offset by a decrease in California avocado
sales.
Sales of Mexican sourced avocados increased $73.2 million, or 138.3%, for fiscal year 2007,
when compared to the same prior year period. The volume of Mexican fruit sold increased by
approximately 61.1 million pounds, or 106.2%, when compared to the same prior year period. This
increase was primarily in the U.S. marketplace and was substantially related to an increased
emphasis in the Mexican avocado crop certified for export to the U.S., which principally stemmed
from the expected, and ultimately realized, smaller California avocado crop. Additionally, the
average per carton selling price of Mexican avocados increased approximately 15.2% when compared to
the same prior year period. We attribute some of this increase to the smaller California avocado
crop in the marketplace during fiscal 2007, as well as the premium pricing related to our
ProRipeVIPTM avocado ripening program.
Sales of Chilean sourced avocados increased $4.9 million for fiscal year 2007, when compared
to the same prior year period. The volume of Chilean fruit sold increased by approximately 7.8
million pounds, or 86.2%, when compared to the same prior year period. This increase was primarily
related to the size of the Chilean avocado crop, as well as the timing of the delivery to the
United States. Our average selling prices, on a per carton basis, of Chilean avocados experienced
a decrease of 11.9% for fiscal 2007, when compared to the same prior period. We attribute some of
these price fluctuations to the size and/or timing of delivery of the Chilean and California
avocado crop in the marketplace during fiscal 2007.
Mexican and Chilean grown avocados are primarily sold in the U.S., Japanese, and/or European
marketplace. We anticipate that the combined sales of Mexican and Chilean grown avocados will
remain comparable in fiscal 2008.
The volume of non-brokered tomatoes increased by approximately 25.6 million pounds during
fiscal 2007, when compared to the same prior year period. This increase, which accounted for the
majority of the fluctuation, was primarily related to a new supplier relationship. We expect a
significant increase in tomato sales during fiscal 2008 due primarily to our new tomato agreements.
See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.
Sales of California sourced avocados decreased $56.5 million for fiscal 2007, when compared to
the same prior period. This decrease was primarily related a 58.3% decrease in pounds of avocados
sold, partially offset by an increase in our average selling prices. The decrease in pounds was
primarily related to a cyclically low California avocado crop for the 2006/2007 season, coupled
with the freeze experienced during our first fiscal quarter. Our market share of shipped
California avocados decreased to 33.7% for fiscal 2007, when compared to a 35.6% market share for
the same prior year period. Based on estimates generated from the California Avocado Commission,
we expect the California avocado crop for the 2007/2008 season to be moderately larger than the
2006/2007 crop.
For fiscal year 2007, average selling prices, on a per carton basis, for California avocados
were 56.2% higher when compared to the same prior year period. We attribute some of this increase
to the aforementioned smaller California avocado crop for the 2006/2007 season. For fiscal year
2008, we believe that the demand for California avocados will remain strong in the U.S.
marketplace, and, as a result, such is expected to have a positive impact on sales prices.
California avocados are primarily sold in the U.S. marketplace.
Fiscal 2006 vs. Fiscal 2005:
Net sales delivered by the business increased by approximately $6.6 million, or 2.9%, from
fiscal 2005 to 2006. This increase was primarily related to an increase in California avocados
sales, partially offset by a decrease in Mexican and Chilean avocado sales.
Sales of California sourced avocados increased $36.5 million for fiscal 2006, when compared to
the same prior period. This increase was primarily related to a 108.1% increase in pounds of avocados
sold, partially offset by a decrease in our average selling prices. This increase in pounds sold
was consistent with the expected increase in the overall harvest of the California avocado crop for
the 2005/2006 season. Our market share of California avocados remained consistent at 35.6% for the
year ended October 31, 2006, compared to 34.4% for the same period in the prior year.
For fiscal year 2006, average selling prices, on a per carton basis, for California avocados
were 35.6% lower when compared to the same prior year period. This pricing structure primarily
reflects the impact of a larger California avocado harvest, as well as a 7.0%
20
Table of Contents
increase in the sale of grade two Hass avocados in proportion to grade one Hass avocados
sales. Grade two Hass avocados generally sell for significantly less than grade one Hass avocados.
Sales of Mexican sourced avocados decreased $13.0 million for fiscal year 2006, when compared
to the same prior year period. This decrease was primarily related to a 19.7% decrease in pounds
of Mexican avocados sold, due primarily to the large California crop discussed above. Our average
selling prices, on a per carton basis, of Mexican avocados experienced a marginal decrease of 3.9%
for fiscal 2006 when compared to the same prior period.
Sales of Chilean sourced avocados decreased $13.6 million for fiscal year 2006, when compared
to the same prior year period. This decrease was primarily related to a 67.7% decrease in pounds
of Chilean avocados sold. This decrease was primarily related to the size of the Chilean avocado
crop, as well as the timing of the delivery to the United States. Our average selling prices, on a
per carton basis, of Chilean avocados experienced a marginal increase of 4.0% for fiscal 2006 when
compared to the same prior period.
Sales of papayas decreased $1.4 million for fiscal year 2006, when compared to the same prior
year period. This decrease was primarily related to a 38.6% decrease in the volume of papaya fruit
sold. This decrease was primarily related to adverse weather conditions negatively affecting the
current year papaya crop. Such decrease, however, was partially offset by an increase in average
selling prices of papayas, on a per carton basis, which increased approximately 44.5% when compared
to the same prior year period. We attribute some of this increase in average selling prices to
significantly fewer pounds sold in the U.S. marketplace.
Processed Products
Fiscal 2007 vs. Fiscal 2006:
Net sales increased by approximately $4.8 million, or 13.1% for fiscal 2007, when compared to
the same prior period. The increase in net sales is primarily attributable to an increase of 2.1
million pounds of product sold, or 10.0%, as well as an increase in the net selling price totaling
$0.05 per product pound sold, or 2.8%. During fiscal year 2007, the increase in pounds sold
primarily relates to an increase in the sale of both our frozen and high-pressure guacamole
products, which increased approximately 12.0% and 6.5% when compared to the same prior year period.
The increase in our net average selling price primarily relates to a change in our product mix.
We currently have two 215L ultra high pressure machines located in Uruapan and estimate we are
operating at approximately 42% of the combined machines capacities as of October 31, 2007. We
believe the additional capacity provided by the 2nd machine is reasonable given our
current sales projections and expected growth. Net sales of our ultra high pressure products
represented approximately 37% and 38% of total processed segment sales for the years ended October
31, 2007 and 2006.
We believe that these ultra high pressure machines will enable our company to deliver the
widest available array of prepared avocado and other products to our customers. Consequently, we
believe that we are positioned to expand our ultra high pressure product line to include more
avocado related products, high-end salsas, mangoes and other readily available fruit products.
Fiscal 2006 vs. Fiscal 2005:
Net sales increased by approximately $8.3 million, or 29.1% for fiscal 2006, when compared to
the same prior period. The increase in net sales is primarily attributable to an increase of 4.9
million pounds of product sold, or 31.1%. Such increase was partially offset, however, by a
decrease in the net selling price totaling $0.02 per product pound sold, or 1.1%. During fiscal
year 2006, the increase in pounds sold primarily relates to an increase in the sale of our
high-pressure guacamole product, which increased approximately 37% when compared to the same prior
year period. The decrease in our net average selling price primarily relates to a change in our
product mix.
21
Table of Contents
Gross Margins
The following table summarizes our gross margins and gross profit percentages by business
segment:
2007 | Change | 2006 | Change | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Margins: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Fresh products |
$ | 21,461 | 14.9 | % | $ | 18,673 | 9.4 | % | $ | 17,071 | ||||||||||
Processed products |
10,311 | (1.0 | )% | 10,411 | 123.3 | % | 4,663 | |||||||||||||
Total gross margins |
$ | 31,772 | 9.2 | % | $ | 29,084 | 33.8 | % | $ | 21,734 | ||||||||||
Gross profit percentages: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Fresh products |
8.2 | % | 7.9 | % | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Processed products |
24.8 | % | 28.3 | % | 16.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
10.5 | % | 10.6 | % | 8.4 | % |
Our cost of sales consists predominantly of fruit costs, packing materials, freight and
handling, labor and overhead (including depreciation) associated with preparing food products, and
other direct expenses pertaining to products sold. Consolidated gross margin, as a percent of
sales, remained consistent for fiscal year 2007 when compared to fiscal year 2006. This
consistency was principally attributable to decreased profitability in our processed product
segment, substantially offset by an increase in profitability from our fresh products segment.
Consolidated gross margin, as a percent of sales, increased 2.2% for fiscal year 2006 when compared
to fiscal year 2005. This increase was principally attributable to increased profitability in
fresh products segment, as well as our processed product segment.
Gross margins and gross profit percentages related to California avocados are largely
dependent on production yields achieved at our packinghouses, current market prices of avocados,
and the volume of avocados packed. The decrease in our gross margin percentage during fiscal year
2007 was primarily related to a significant decrease in pounds of fruit sold, as well as an
increase in the market price of avocados. During fiscal year 2007, when compared to fiscal year
2006, we experienced a 58.3% decrease in pounds of avocados sold. Additionally, we also
experienced a 56.2% increase in the average sales price of California avocados. Combined, these
had the effect of increasing our per pound costs, which, as a result, negatively impacted gross
margins.
The increase in our gross margin percentage related to California avocados during fiscal year
2006 was primarily related to a significant increase in pounds of fruit sold, partially offset by
an increase in the cost of fruit. During fiscal year 2006, when compared to fiscal year 2005, we
experienced a 108.1% increase in pounds of avocados sold. This had the effect of decreasing our
per pound costs, which, as a result, positively impacted gross margins.
The gross margin and gross profit percentage for consignment sales, including Chilean avocados
and tomatoes, is dependent on the volume of fruit we handle and the competitiveness of the returns
that we provide to third-party packers. The gross margin we earn is generally based on a
commission agreed to with each party. Accordingly, the gross margin results for these products are
a function of the volume handled and the competitiveness of the sales prices that we realize.
Although we generally do not take legal title to such avocados and perishable products, we do
assume responsibilities (principally assuming credit risk, inventory loss and delivery risk, and
limited pricing risk) that are consistent with acting as a principal in the transaction.
Accordingly, our results of operations include sales and cost of sales from the sale of avocados
and perishable products procured under consignment arrangements. For fiscal years 2007, 2006, and
2005, we generated gross margins of $1.7 million, $1.2 million, and $1.7 million from the sale of
fresh produce products that were packed by third parties.
Our business with Mexican growers differs in that we operate a packinghouse in Mexico and
purchase avocados directly from the field. Alternatively, we may also purchase Mexican avocados
directly from co-packers located in Mexico as well. In either case, the gross margin and gross
profit percentages generated by our Mexican operations are significantly impacted by the volume of
avocados handled by our packinghouse and the cost of the fruit. During fiscal year 2007, our gross
margins generated from the sale of Mexican avocados increased from approximately $1.6 million in
fiscal year 2006 to $14.0 million in fiscal year 2007. Such increase was primarily related to a
106.2% increase in the volume of Mexican avocados sold, as well as higher sales prices of Mexican
fruit. Collectively, these items positively affected gross margins.
During fiscal year 2006, our gross margins generated from the sale of Mexican avocados
decreased from approximately $3.8 million in fiscal year 2005 to $1.6 million in fiscal year 2006.
Such decrease is primarily related to both the significant decrease in the volume of Mexican
avocados sold, totaling 19.7% (primarily related to the large California crop discussed above), as
well as an increase in Mexican fruit costs. Collectively, these items contributed to a higher per
pound cost, which negatively affected gross margins.
22
Table of Contents
Gross margins and gross profit percentages for our processed products business are largely
dependent on the pricing of our final product and the cost of avocados used in preparing guacamole.
During fiscal year 2007, the processed products gross profit percentages decreased primarily as a
result of higher fruit costs, as well as increased packaging costs, both of which had the effect of
increasing our per pound costs. Such were partially offset, however, by an increase in total
pounds produced, which had the effect of reducing our per pound costs. We anticipate that the
gross profit percentage for our processed product segment will continue to experience fluctuations
during the next fiscal year primarily due to the uncertainty of the cost of fruit that will be used
in the production process.
During fiscal year 2006, when compared to the same prior year period, the processed products gross profit percentages increased primarily
as a result of lower fruit costs and increases in total pounds produced, both of which had the
effect of reducing our per pound costs.
Selling, General and Administrative
2007 | Change | 2006 | Change | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 19,759 | NM | $ | 19,767 | 6.3 | % | $ | 18,588 | |||||||||||
Percentage of net sales |
6.5 | % | 7.2 | % | 7.2 | % |
NM | Not meaningful |
Selling, general and administrative expenses include costs of marketing and advertising, sales
expenses, and other general and administrative costs. For fiscal year 2007, selling, general and
administrative expenses remained substantially consistent when compared to the same period for
fiscal 2006. This consistency was primarily related to higher corporate costs, including, but not
limited to, costs related to an increase bad debt expense (totaling approximately $0.5 million), an
increase in legal fees (totaling approximately $0.1 million), and an increase in management bonuses
(totaling approximately $0.1 million). Such higher corporate costs were substantially offset,
however, by a decrease in auditing/Sarbanes-Oxley costs (totaling approximately $0.1 million), and
a decrease in stock option expense (totaling approximately $0.6 million).
For fiscal year 2006, selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.2 million,
or 6.3%, compared to the same period for fiscal 2005. This increase was primarily related to
higher corporate costs, including, but not limited to, costs related to an increase in stock-based
compensation (totaling approximately $0.6 million), an increase in management bonuses (totaling
approximately $1.1 million), and an increase in employee compensation costs (totaling approximately
$0.5 million). Such higher corporate costs were partially offset by a decrease in
auditing/Sarbanes-Oxley costs (totaling approximately $0.2 million), a decrease in bad debt expense
(totaling approximately $0.5 million), and a decrease in corporate moving expenses (totaling
approximately $0.3 million).
Interest income
2007 | Change | 2006 | Change | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 248 | (30.3 | )% | $ | 356 | 2.3 | % | $ | 348 | ||||||||||
Percentage of net sales |
0.1 | % | 0.1 | % | 0.1 | % |
Interest income was primarily generated from loans to growers and our notes receivable from
shareholders. During fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, interest income includes interest accrued
on notes receivable from directors and officers of approximately $0.1 million, $0.2 million and
$0.2 million.
Interest expense
2007 | Change | 2006 | Change | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | (1,346 | ) | 42.7 | % | $ | (943 | ) | 136.3 | % | $ | (399 | ) | |||||||
Percentage of net sales |
(0.4 | )% | (0.3 | )% | (0.2 | )% |
Interest expense is primarily generated from our line of credit borrowings, as well as our
term loan agreement with Farm Credit West, PCA. For fiscal 2007, as compared to fiscal 2006, the
increase in interest expense was primarily related to a higher average outstanding balance under
our non-collateralized, revolving credit facilities with Farm Credit West, PCA and Bank of America,
N.A.
23
Table of Contents
For fiscal 2006, as compared to fiscal 2005, the increase in interest expense was primarily
related to the non-collateralized term loan agreement with Farm Credit West, PCA that we entered
into in July 2005 to finance the purchase of our Limoneira Stock. Pursuant to such agreement, we
borrowed $13.0 million, which is to be repaid in 10 annual installments of $1.3 million. Such
annual installments began July 2006 and continue through July 2015. Interest is paid monthly, in
arrears, and began in August 2005, and will continue through the life of the loan. Such loan bears
interest at a fixed rate of 5.70%.
Other Income, Net
2007 | Change | 2006 | Change | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
$ | 512 | (14.5 | )% | $ | 599 | (75.1 | )% | $ | 2,408 | ||||||||||
Percentage of net sales |
0.2 | % | 0.2 | % | 0.9 | % |
Other income, net includes dividend income, as well as certain other transactions that are
outside of the course of normal operations. During fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005, we received $0.4
million, $0.4 million, and $0.2 million as dividend income from Limoneira. During fiscal year
2005, other income, net includes the gain on the sale of our corporate facility totaling
approximately $1.7 million.
Provision for Income Taxes
2007 | Change | 2006 | Change | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 4,271 | 18.0 | % | $ | 3,620 | 66.0 | % | $ | 2,181 | ||||||||||
Percentage of income before
provision for income taxes |
36.8 | % | 38.5 | % | 39.6 | % |
The effective income tax rate for fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005 is higher than the federal
statutory rate principally due to state taxes. Our effective income tax rate decreased from 38.5%
in fiscal year 2006 to 36.8% in fiscal year 2007 primarily as a result of a an increase in pre-tax
income in a foreign jurisdiction with favorable tax rates. Our effective income tax rate decreased
from 39.6% in fiscal year 2005 to 38.5% in fiscal year 2006 primarily as a result of a favorable
decrease in our foreign tax rates during fiscal year 2006 when compared to fiscal year 2005.
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table presents our operating results for each of the eight fiscal quarters in
the period ended October 31, 2007. The information for each of these quarters is derived from our
unaudited interim financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. In our opinion, all necessary
adjustments, which consist only of normal and recurring accruals, have been included to fairly
present our unaudited quarterly results. The California crop is highly seasonal and is
characterized by crop volume and price changes. Historically, we receive and sell a substantially
lesser number of California avocados in our first fiscal quarter.
Three months ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oct. 31, | July 31, | Apr. 30, | Jan. 31, | Oct. 31, | July 31, | Apr. 30, | Jan. 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 85,295 | $ | 91,212 | $ | 69,184 | $ | 57,293 | $ | 76,880 | $ | 78,954 | $ | 67,429 | $ | 50,647 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
78,214 | 82,680 | 59,993 | 50,325 | 69,896 | 68,738 | 58,768 | 47,237 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
7,081 | 8,532 | 9,191 | 6,968 | 6,984 | 10,216 | 8,661 | 3,410 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
5,608 | 4,708 | 4,812 | 4,631 | 5,163 | 5,284 | 5,063 | 4,444 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
1,473 | 3,824 | 4,379 | 2,337 | 1,821 | 4,932 | 3,598 | (1,034 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
128 | (247 | ) | (137 | ) | (156 | ) | 292 | (136 | ) | 10 | (75 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before provision (benefit)
for income taxes |
1,601 | 3,577 | 4,242 | 2,181 | 2,113 | 4,796 | 3,608 | (1,109 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
411 | 1,355 | 1,655 | 850 | 775 | 1,870 | 1,419 | (444 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,190 | $ | 2,222 | $ | 2,587 | $ | 1,331 | $ | 1,338 | $ | 2,926 | $ | 2,189 | $ | (665 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.15 | $ | (0.05 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.15 | $ | (0.05 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Number of shares used in per share
computation: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
14,329 | 14,300 | 14,294 | 14,293 | 14,292 | 14,171 | 14,282 | 14,352 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
14,530 | 14,452 | 14,398 | 14,359 | 14,319 | 14,237 | 14,343 | 14,352 |
24
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating activities for fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005 provided cash flows of $4.6 million, $7.8
million, and $5.6 million. Fiscal year 2007 operating cash flows reflect our net income of $7.3
million, net noncash charges (depreciation and amortization, income from Maui Fresh, LLC, loss on
disposal of fixed assets, provision for losses on accounts receivable, deferred income taxes and
stock compensation expense) of $3.1 million and a net decrease from changes in the non-cash components of our
working capital of approximately $5.8 million.
Fiscal year 2007 decreases in operating cash flows, caused by working capital changes, include
a decrease in payable to growers of $3.9 million, a decrease in trade accounts payable and accrued
expenses of $2.9 million, a net increase in accounts receivable of $2.2 million, and an increase in
advance to suppliers of $0.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in inventory of $2.2 million,
a net decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets of $1.0 million, a decrease in income tax
receivable of $0.8 million, and a decrease in other assets totaling $0.1 million.
Our amounts payable to growers reflects a significant decrease in the volume of California
avocados received in the month of October 2007, as compared to October 2006. The decreases in our
trade accounts payable and accrued expenses as of October 31, 2007, when compared to October 31,
2006, primarily reflect the timing of certain payments, reductions related to vendors used in the
ordinary course of California business, which decreased significantly as compared to prior year, as
well as a reduction in our promotional allowance liability.
The increase in our accounts receivable balance as of October 31, 2007, when compared to
October 31, 2006, primarily reflects a significantly higher volume of Mexican and Chilean avocado
sales, partially offset by a significant reduction in the volume of California avocado sales,
recorded in the month of October 2007, as compared to October 2006. These volume level
fluctuations are consistent with the harvests experienced, and our increased emphasis in the
Mexican avocado crop certified for export to the U.S., in the related years. The increase in our
advances to suppliers as of October 31, 2007, as compared to October 31, 2006, primarily reflects
our advances pursuant to our new tomato agreements. See Note 16 in our consolidated financial
statements.
The decrease in our inventory balance is primarily related to a significant reduction in
California inventory on hand at October 31, 2007, as compared to the same prior year period.
Additionally, we also experienced a significant decrease in finished processed products inventory
based primarily on sales exceeding production during fiscal 2007, as compared to fiscal 2006. The
net decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets primarily relates to the collection of
certain non-trade receivables, and the decrease in our income tax receivable was primarily related
to estimated payments made in fiscal 2007, as compared to pre-tax income for fiscal 2007.
Cash used in investing activities was $8.0 million, $4.7 million, and $11.9 million for fiscal
years 2007, 2006, and 2005. Fiscal year 2007 cash flows used in investing activities include
capital expenditures of $3.0 million and a $5.0 million loan to Agricola Belher pursuant to our
tomato agreements. See Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements.
Cash provided by financing activities was $4.2 million and $6.9 million for fiscal years 2007
and 2005, while cash used in financing activities was $4.2 million for fiscal year 2006. Cash
provided during fiscal year 2007 primarily includes proceeds from our non-collateralized, revolving
credit facilities totaling $6.8 million, $2.4 million related to payments on notes receivable from
shareholders and $0.7 million related to stock option exercises. These cash receipts were
partially offset, however, by the payment of a dividend totaling $4.6 million and a payment related
to our long-term obligation of $1.3 million.
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash reserves, cash generated from
operations and amounts available for borrowing under our existing credit facilities. Cash and cash
equivalents as of October 31, 2007 and 2006 totaled $1.0 million and $0.1 million. Our working
capital at October 31, 2007 was $16.3 million compared to $12.0 million at October 31, 2006. The
overall working capital increase primarily reflects a reduction in payables to growers and trade
accounts payable, partially offset by additional short-term borrowings.
We believe that cash flows from operations and available credit facilities will be sufficient
to satisfy our future capital expenditures, grower recruitment efforts, working capital and other
financing requirements. We will continue to evaluate grower recruitment opportunities and
exclusivity arrangements with food service companies to fuel growth in each of our business
segments. In July 2007 and October 2007, we renewed and extended our non-collateralized, revolving
credit facilities with Farm Credit West, PCA and Bank of America, N.A. These two credit facilities
now expire in February 2012 and July 2009. Under the terms of these agreements, we are advanced
funds for both working capital and long-term productive asset purchases. Total credit available
under these combined borrowing agreements was $30 million, with a weighted-average interest rate of
5.8% and 6.2% at October 31, 2007 and 2006. Under these credit facilities, we had $10.6 million
and $3.8 million outstanding as of October 31, 2007 and 2006, of which $4.0 million was classified
as a long-term liability as of October 31, 2007. We had no long-term amounts outstanding pursuant
to these credit facilities as of October 31, 2006. These credit facilities contain various
financial covenants, the most significant relating
25
Table of Contents
to working capital, tangible net worth (as defined), and Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) (as defined). We were in compliance with all such covenants
at October 31, 2007.
The following table summarizes contractual obligations pursuant to which we are required to make
cash payments. The information is presented as of our fiscal year ended October 31, 2007:
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 4-5 years | More than 5 years | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations
(including interest) |
$ | 17,132 | $ | 2,054 | $ | 8,360 | $ | 3,970 | $ | 2,748 | ||||||||||
Revolving credit facilities |
6,630 | 6,630 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Defined benefit plan |
361 | 47 | 141 | 94 | 79 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease commitments |
4,719 | 739 | 1,602 | 751 | 1,627 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 28,842 | $ | 9,470 | $ | 10,103 | $ | 4,815 | $ | 4,454 | ||||||||||
The California avocado industry is subject to a state marketing order whereby handlers are
required to collect assessments from the growers and remit such assessments to the California
Avocado Commission (CAC). The assessments are primarily for advertising and promotions. The
amount of the assessment is based on the dollars paid to the growers for their fruit, and, as a
result, is not determinable until the value of the payments to the growers has been calculated.
With similar precision, amounts remitted to the Hass Avocado Board (HAB) in connection with
their assessment program (see Item 7 for further discussion), are likewise not determinable until
the fruit is actually delivered to us. HAB assessments are primarily used to fund marketing and promotion efforts.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
26
Table of Contents
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes
receivable from shareholders, payable to growers, accounts payable, current borrowings pursuant to
our credit facilities with financial institutions, and long-term, fixed-rate obligations. All of
our financial instruments are entered into during the normal course of operations and have not been
acquired for trading purposes. The table below summarizes interest rate sensitive financial
instruments and presents principal cash flows in U.S. dollars, which is our reporting currency, and
weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates, as of October 31, 2007.
Expected maturity date October 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(All amounts in thousands) | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Thereafter | Total | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents (1) |
$ | 967 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 967 | $ | 967 | ||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable (1) |
25,992 | | | | | | 25,992 | 25,992 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Advances to Suppliers (1) |
2,292 | | | | | | 2,292 | 2,292 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payable to growers (1) |
$ | 2,414 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,414 | $ | 2,414 | ||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable (1) |
2,643 | | | | | | 2,643 | 2,643 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current borrowings pursuant to credit
facilities (1) |
6,630 | | | | | | 6,630 | 6,630 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings pursuant to credit
facilities (2) |
| 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | | 4,000 | 4,092 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed-rate long-term obligations (3) |
1,307 | 1,306 | 1,300 | 1,300 | 1,300 | 3,900 | 10,413 | 9,972 |
(1) | We believe the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, advances to suppliers, payable to growers, accounts payable, and current borrowings pursuant to credit facilities approximate their fair value due to the short maturity of these financial instruments. | |
(2) | Long-term borrowings pursuant to our credit facility bears interest at 6.4%. We believe that a portfolio of loans with a similar risk profile would currently yield a return of 5.7%. We project the impact of an increase or decrease in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in a change of fair value by approximately $122,000. | |
(3) | Fixed-rate long-term obligations bear interest rates ranging from 3.3% to 5.7% with a weighted-average interest rate of 5.7%. We believe that loans with a similar risk profile would currently yield a return of 7.0%. We project the impact of an increase or decrease in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in a change of fair value of approximately $333,000. |
We were not a party to any derivative instruments during the fiscal year. It is currently our
intent not to use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Additionally, we do
not use any hedging or forward contracts to offset market volatility.
Our Mexican-based operations transact business in Mexican pesos. Funds are transferred by our
corporate office to Mexico on a weekly basis to satisfy domestic cash needs. Consequently, the spot
rate for the Mexican peso has a moderate impact on our operating results. However, we do not
believe that this impact is sufficient to warrant the use of derivative instruments to hedge the
fluctuation in the Mexican peso. Total foreign currency gains and losses for each of the three
years in the period ended October 31, 2007 do not exceed $0.1 million.
27
Table of Contents
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share amounts)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share amounts)
October 31, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 967 | $ | 50 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
of $2,271 (2007) and $1,833 (2006) |
25,992 | 24,202 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
8,359 | 10,569 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
4,911 | 4,934 | ||||||
Advances to suppliers |
2,292 | 1,475 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
1,539 | 2,268 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,525 | 2,348 | ||||||
Total current assets |
46,585 | 45,846 | ||||||
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
20,888 | 19,908 | ||||||
Investment in Limoneira |
48,962 | 33,879 | ||||||
Investment in Maui Fresh, LLC |
403 | 229 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,591 | 3,591 | ||||||
Other assets |
7,589 | 4,110 | ||||||
$ | 128,018 | $ | 107,563 | |||||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Payable to growers |
$ | 2,414 | $ | 6,334 | ||||
Trade accounts payable |
2,643 | 4,046 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
12,227 | 13,758 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings |
6,630 | 3,804 | ||||||
Dividend payable |
5,030 | 4,573 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term obligations |
1,307 | 1,308 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
30,251 | 33,823 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities: |
||||||||
Long-term obligations, less current portion |
13,106 | 10,406 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
10,658 | 4,391 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities |
23,764 | 14,797 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock ($0.001 par value, 100,000 shares
authorized; 14,371 and 14,293 shares outstanding
at October 31, 2007 and 2006) |
14 | 14 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
38,068 | 37,109 | ||||||
Notes receivable from shareholders |
| (2,430 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
15,664 | 6,293 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
20,257 | 17,957 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
74,003 | 58,943 | ||||||
$ | 128,018 | $ | 107,563 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
28
Table of Contents
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 302,984 | $ | 273,723 | $ | 258,822 | ||||||
Cost of sales |
271,212 | 244,639 | 237,088 | |||||||||
Gross margin |
31,772 | 29,084 | 21,734 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
19,759 | 19,767 | 18,588 | |||||||||
Operating income |
12,013 | 9,317 | 3,146 | |||||||||
Equity in earnings from Maui Fresh, LLC |
174 | 79 | | |||||||||
Interest income |
248 | 356 | 348 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(1,346 | ) | (943 | ) | (399 | ) | ||||||
Other income, net |
512 | 599 | 2,408 | |||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
11,601 | 9,408 | 5,503 | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
4,271 | 3,620 | 2,181 | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,330 | $ | 5,788 | $ | 3,322 | ||||||
Net income per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.51 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.24 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.51 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.24 | ||||||
Number of shares used in per share computation: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
14,304 | 14,304 | 13,892 | |||||||||
Diluted |
14,435 | 14,354 | 13,985 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
29
Table of Contents
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(All amounts in thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(All amounts in thousands)
Year ended | ||||||||||||
October 31, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,330 | $ | 5,788 | $ | 3,322 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax: |
||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period |
15,083 | (11,755 | ) | 22,184 | ||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) related to items of other
comprehensive income (loss) |
(5,712 | ) | 4,662 | (8,798 | ) | |||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
9,371 | (7,093 | ) | 13,386 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 16,701 | $ | (1,305 | ) | $ | 16,708 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
30
Table of Contents
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
Notes | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Receivable | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-in | From | Comprehensive | Retained | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Shareholders | Income | Earnings | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, October 31, 2004 |
13,507 | $ | 14 | $ | 28,822 | $ | (2,883 | ) | $ | | $ | 17,984 | $ | 43,937 | |||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options and
income tax benefit of $59 |
55 | | 334 | | | | 334 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
| | 84 | | | | 84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock to Limoneira |
1,000 | 1 | 9,999 | | | | 10,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on Limoneira investment,
net |
| | | | 13,386 | | 13,386 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of common stock |
(200 | ) | (1 | ) | (1,999 | ) | | | | (2,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Collections on shareholder notes receivable |
| | | 247 | | | 247 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend declared to shareholders |
| | | | | (4,564 | ) | (4,564 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 3,322 | 3,322 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, October 31, 2005 |
14,362 | 14 | 37,240 | (2,636 | ) | 13,386 | 16,742 | 64,746 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options and
income tax benefit of $146 |
51 | | 403 | | | | 403 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
| | 666 | | | | 666 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on Limoneira investment,
net |
| | | | (7,093 | ) | | (7,093 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of common stock |
(120 | ) | | (1,200 | ) | | | | (1,200 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Collections on shareholder notes receivable |
| | | 206 | | | 206 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend declared to shareholders |
| | | | | (4,573 | ) | (4,573 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 5,788 | 5,788 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, October 31, 2006 |
14,293 | 14 | 37,109 | (2,430 | ) | 6,293 | 17,957 | 58,943 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options and
income tax benefit of $233 |
78 | | 943 | | | | 943 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation expense |
| | 16 | | | | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on Limoneira investment,
net |
| | | | 9,371 | | 9,371 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Collections on shareholder notes receivable |
| | | 2,430 | | | 2,430 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend declared to shareholders |
| | | | | (5,030 | ) | (5,030 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 7,330 | 7,330 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, October 31, 2007 |
14,371 | $ | 14 | $ | 38,068 | $ | | $ | 15,664 | $ | 20,257 | $ | 74,003 | ||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
31
Table of Contents
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Year Ended October 31, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,330 | $ | 5,788 | $ | 3,322 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,391 | 2,326 | 3,151 | |||||||||
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
473 | 14 | 475 | |||||||||
Income from Maui Fresh, LLC |
(174 | ) | (79 | ) | | |||||||
Stock compensation expense |
16 | 666 | 84 | |||||||||
Loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant, and equipment |
8 | 23 | (1,668 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
378 | 767 | (1,925 | ) | ||||||||
Effect on cash of changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(2,263 | ) | (4,963 | ) | 1,403 | |||||||
Inventories, net |
2,210 | (473 | ) | 1,279 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
1,023 | (974 | ) | (1,072 | ) | |||||||
Advances to suppliers |
(886 | ) | (265 | ) | 1,272 | |||||||
Income taxes receivable |
816 | (1,229 | ) | (31 | ) | |||||||
Other assets |
92 | (1,286 | ) | 60 | ||||||||
Payable to growers |
(3,920 | ) | 4,581 | (4,036 | ) | |||||||
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(2,865 | ) | 2,923 | 3,254 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
4,629 | 7,819 | 5,568 | |||||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
||||||||||||
Acquisitions of property, plant, and equipment |
(2,950 | ) | (4,513 | ) | (1,874 | ) | ||||||
Loan to Agricola Belher |
(5,000 | ) | | | ||||||||
Cash settlement of the acquisition of Limoneira stock, net of our common stock issued |
| | (13,450 | ) | ||||||||
Investment in Maui Fresh, LLC |
| (150 | ) | | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of building |
| | 3,383 | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(7,950 | ) | (4,663 | ) | (11,941 | ) | ||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
||||||||||||
Dividend paid to shareholders |
(4,573 | ) | (4,564 | ) | (4,052 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from (repayments of) short-term borrowings, net |
6,826 | 2,380 | (576 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
| | 13,000 | |||||||||
Payments on long-term obligations |
(1,301 | ) | (1,318 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||
Retirement of common stock |
| (1,200 | ) | (2,000 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
710 | 257 | 275 | |||||||||
Tax benefit of stock option exercises |
146 | | | |||||||||
Proceeds from collection of shareholder notes receivable |
2,430 | 206 | 247 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
4,238 | (4,239 | ) | 6,870 | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
917 | (1,083 | ) | 497 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
50 | 1,133 | 636 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
$ | 967 | $ | 50 | $ | 1,133 | ||||||
Supplemental Information |
||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year for: |
||||||||||||
Interest |
$ | 1,310 | $ | 936 | $ | 399 | ||||||
Income taxes |
$ | 3,100 | $ | 4,091 | $ | 3,875 | ||||||
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities: |
||||||||||||
Tax receivable increase related to stock option exercise |
$ | 233 | $ | 146 | $ | 59 | ||||||
Declared dividends payable |
$ | 5,030 | $ | 4,573 | $ | 4,564 | ||||||
Issuance of our common stock in Limoneira transaction |
$ | | $ | | $ | 10,000 | ||||||
Construction in progress included in trade accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | | $ | 438 | $ | 396 | ||||||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) |
$ | 15,083 | $ | (11,755 | ) | $ | 22,184 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
32
Table of Contents
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Description of the business
Business
Calavo Growers, Inc. (Calavo, the Company, we, us or our) procures and markets avocados and
other perishable commodities and prepares and distributes processed avocado products. Our
expertise in marketing and distributing avocados, processed avocados, and other perishable foods
allows us to deliver a wide array of fresh and processed food products to food distributors,
produce wholesalers, supermarkets, and restaurants on a worldwide basis. We procure avocados
principally from California, Mexico, and Chile. Through our operating facilities in southern
California, Texas, New Jersey, Arizona, and Mexico, we sort, pack, and/or ripen avocados for
distribution both domestically and internationally. Additionally, we also distribute other
perishable foods, such as tomatoes and Hawaiian grown papayas, and prepare processed avocado
products. We report our operations in two different business segments: (1) fresh products and (2)
processed products.
2. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Calavo Growers, Inc. and our
wholly owned subsidiaries, Calavo Foods, Inc., Calavo de Mexico S.A. de C.V., Calavo Foods de
Mexico S.A. de C.V., and Maui Fresh International, Inc. (Maui). Effective November 2007, we
dissolved our Calavo Foods, Inc. subsidiary. Such dissolution did not have any impact on our
financial position or our results of operations. All intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid financial instruments purchased with an original maturity date
of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents
approximate their fair values.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed on a weighted-average
basis, which approximates the first-in, first-out method; market is based upon estimated
replacement costs. Costs included in inventory primarily include the following: fruit, picking
and hauling, overhead, labor, materials and freight.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful
lives using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are stated at cost and amortized over
the lesser of their estimated useful lives or the term of the lease, using the straight-line
method. Useful lives are as follows: buildings and improvements 7 to 50 years; leasehold
improvements the lesser of the term of the lease or 7 years; equipment 7 to 25 years;
information systems hardware and software 3 to 15 years. Significant repairs and maintenance
that increase the value or extend the useful life of our fixed asset are capitalized. Replaced
units are written off. Ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to expense.
We capitalize software development costs for internal use in accordance with Statement of
Position 98-1, Accounting for Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use
(SOP 98-1). Capitalization of software development costs begins in the application development
stage and ends when the asset is placed into service. We amortize such costs using the
straight-line basis over estimated useful lives. The net book value of capitalized computer
software costs was $0.2 million and $0.3 million as of October 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related
depreciation expense was $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007
and 2006.
Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill is tested at
the reporting unit level, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating
segment. Goodwill impairment testing is a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill
impairment test, used to identify
33
Table of Contents
potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount,
including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of
the reporting unit is considered not impaired, and the second step of the impairment test would be
unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of
the goodwill impairment test must be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.
The second step of the goodwill impairment test, used to measure the amount of impairment loss,
compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that
goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that
goodwill, an impairment loss must be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. Goodwill
impairment testing requires significant judgment and management estimates, including, but not
limited to, the determination of (i) the number of reporting units, (ii) the goodwill and other
assets and liabilities to be allocated to the reporting units and (iii) the fair values of the
reporting units. The estimates and assumptions described above, along with other factors such as
discount rates, will significantly affect the outcome of the impairment tests and the amounts of
any resulting impairment losses. We performed our annual assessment of goodwill and determined
that no impairment existed as of October 31, 2007.
Included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are the
following intangible assets: customer-related intangibles of $590,000 (accumulated amortization of
$442,000 at October 31, 2007), brand name intangibles of $275,000 and other identified intangibles
totaling $2,000 (accumulated amortization of $2,000 at October 31, 2007). The customer-related
intangibles are being amortized over five years. The intangible asset related to the brand name
currently has an indefinite remaining useful life and, as a result, is not currently subject to
amortization. We performed our annual assessment of the brand name intangible and determined that
no impairment existed as of October 31, 2007. We anticipate recording amortization expense related
to customer-related intangibles of approximately $119,000 for fiscal 2008, with the remaining
amortization expense of approximately $27,000 recorded in fiscal 2009.
Long-lived Assets
Long-lived assets, including fixed assets and intangible assets (other than goodwill), are
continually monitored and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of any such asset may not be recoverable. The determination of
recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use
of an asset and its eventual disposition. The estimate of undiscounted cash flows is based upon,
among other things, certain assumptions about future operating performance, growth rates and other
factors. Estimates of undiscounted cash flows may differ from actual cash flows due to, among
other things, technological changes, economic conditions, changes to the business model or changes
in operating performance. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less
then the carrying value, an impairment loss will be recognized, measured as the amount by which the
carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. We have evaluated our long-lived assets and
determined that no impairment existed as of October 31, 2007.
Investments
We account for non-marketable investments using the equity method of accounting if the
investment gives us the ability to exercise significant influence over, but not control, an
investee. Significant influence generally exists when we have an ownership interest representing
between 20% and 50% of the voting stock of the investee. Under the equity method of accounting,
investments are stated at initial cost and are adjusted for subsequent additional investments and
our proportionate share of earnings or losses and distributions. Additional investments by other
parties in the investee, if any, will result in a reduction in our ownership interest, and the
resulting gain or loss will be recorded in our consolidated statements of income. See Note 15.
Marketable Securities
We account for marketable securities in accordance with provisions of SFAS No. 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS 115). SFAS 115 addresses the
accounting and reporting for investments in fixed maturity securities and for equity securities
with readily determinable fair values. Our marketable securities consist of our investment in
Limoneira Company (Limoneira) stock. We currently own approximately
15% of Limoneiras outstanding common stock. These securities are carried at fair value as determined from quoted market
prices. The estimated fair value, cost, and gross unrealized gain related to such investment was
$49.0 million, $23.5 million and $25.5 million as of October 31, 2007. The estimated fair value,
cost, and gross unrealized gain related to such investment was $33.9 million, $23.5 million and
$10.4 million as of October 31, 2006.
Advances to Suppliers
We advance funds to third-party growers primarily in Chile and Mexico for various farming
needs. Typically, we obtain collateral (i.e. fruit, fixed assets, etc.) that approximates the
value at risk, prior to making such advances. We continuously evaluate the ability of these
growers to repay advances in order to evaluate the possible need to record an allowance. No such
allowance was required at October 31, 2007, nor October 31, 2006.
34
Table of Contents
Accrued Expenses
Included in accrued expenses at October 31, 2007 are un-vouchered receipts of approximately
$1.9 million. Included in accrued expenses at October 31, 2006 are un-vouchered receipts of $2.3
million.
Revenue Recognition
Sales of products and related costs of products sold are recognized when (i) persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the price is fixed or
determinable and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. These terms are typically met upon
shipment of product to the customer. Service revenue, including freight, ripening, storage,
bagging and palletization charges, is recorded when services are performed and sales of the related
products are delivered.
Shipping and Handling
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-10, Accounting for Shipping
and Handling Fees and Costs, we include shipping and handling fees billed to customers in net
revenues. Amounts incurred by us for freight are included in cost of goods sold.
Promotional Allowances
We provide for promotional allowances at the time of sale, based on our historical experience.
Our estimates are generally based on evaluating the relationship between promotional allowances
and gross sales. The derived percentage is then applied to the current periods sales revenues in
order to arrive at the appropriate debit to sales allowances for the period. The offsetting credit
is made to allowance for accounts receivable. When certain amounts of specific customer accounts
are subsequently identified as promotional, they are written off against this allowance. Actual
amounts may differ from these estimates and such differences are recognized as an adjustment to net
sales in the period they are identified.
Allowance for Accounts Receivable
We provide an allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts receivable balances based on
historical experience and the aging of the related accounts receivable.
Consignment Arrangements
We frequently enter into consignment arrangements with avocado growers and packers located
outside of the United States and growers of certain perishable products in the United States.
Although we generally do not take legal title to these avocados and perishable products, we do
assume responsibilities (principally assuming credit risk, inventory loss and delivery risk, and
limited pricing risk) that are consistent with acting as a principal in the transaction.
Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements include sales and cost of sales from the sale of
avocados and perishable products procured under consignment arrangements. Amounts recorded for
each of the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 in the financial statements pursuant
to consignment arrangements are as follows (in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 22,347 | $ | 10,127 | $ | 27,171 | ||||||
Cost of Sales |
20,640 | 8,943 | 25,456 | |||||||||
Gross Margin |
$ | 1,707 | $ | 1,184 | $ | 1,715 | ||||||
Advertising Expense
Advertising costs are expensed when incurred. Such costs in fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005 were
approximately $0.1 million, $0.4
million, and $0.3 million.
Other income, net
Included in other income, net is dividend income totaling $0.4 million, $0.4 million and $0.2
million for fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005.
35
Table of Contents
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Among
the significant estimates affecting the financial statements are those related to valuation
allowances for accounts receivable, goodwill, grower advances, inventories, long-lived assets,
valuation of and estimated useful lives of identifiable intangible assets, stock-based
compensation, promotional allowances and income taxes. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its
estimates based upon currently available information. Actual results could differ materially from
those estimates.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
This statement requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future
consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax
returns. Measurement of the deferred items is based on enacted tax laws. In the event the future
consequences of differences between financial reporting bases and tax bases of our assets and
liabilities result in a deferred tax asset, SFAS No. 109 requires an evaluation of the probability
of being able to realize the future benefits indicated by such asset. A valuation
allowance related to a deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Basic and Diluted Net Income per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the period without consideration of the dilutive effect of stock options. The
basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding was 14,304,000, 14,304,000, and
13,892,000 for fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated
using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period after
consideration of the dilutive effect of stock options, which were 131,000, 50,000, and 93,000 for
fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005. There were no anti-dilutive options for fiscal years 2007, 2006
and 2005.
Stock-Based Compensation
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. This pronouncement
amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that companies account for
awards of equity instruments issued to employees under the fair value method of accounting and
recognize such amounts in their statements of operations. We adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on November
1, 2005 using the modified prospective method and, accordingly, have not restated the consolidated
statements of operations for prior interim periods or fiscal years. Under SFAS No. 123(R), we are
required to measure compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant
and recognize compensation expense in our consolidated statements of operations over the service
period that the awards are expected to vest.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we accounted for employee stock-based compensation
using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, as permitted by SFAS No.
123 and SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. Under
the intrinsic value method, the difference between the market price on the date of grant and the
exercise price is charged to the statement of operations over the vesting period. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we recognized compensation cost only for stock options issued with
exercise prices set below market prices on the date of grant and provided the necessary pro forma
disclosures required under SFAS No. 123.
During the year ended October 31, 2005, we recognized $84,000 of compensation expense with
respect to stock option awards pursuant to APB 25, which was charged to the consolidated statement
of operations. For the year ended October 31, 2005, had stock-based compensation been accounted
for based on the estimated grant date fair values, as defined by SFAS No. 123(R), the Companys net
income and net income per share would have been the following pro forma amounts (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
36
Table of Contents
Net Income: | Fiscal Year Ended 2005 | |||
As reported |
$ | 3,322 | ||
Add: Total stock-based compensation
expense determined under APB 25 and related
interpretations, net of tax effects |
51 | |||
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation
expense determined under fair value based
method for all awards, net of tax effects |
(54 | ) | ||
Pro forma |
$ | 3,319 | ||
Net income per share, as reported: |
||||
Basic |
$ | 0.25 | ||
Diluted |
$ | 0.25 | ||
Net income per share, pro forma: |
||||
Basic |
$ | 0.25 | ||
Diluted |
$ | 0.25 |
Under SFAS No. 123(R), we now record in our consolidated statements of operations (i)
compensation cost for options granted, modified, repurchased or cancelled on or after November 1,
2005 under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) and (ii) compensation cost for the unvested portion of
options granted prior to November 1, 2005 over their remaining vesting periods using the amounts
previously measured under SFAS No. 123 for pro forma disclosure purposes. For the years ended
October 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, we recognized compensation expense of $16,000, $666,000 and
$84,000 related to stock-based compensation.
The value of each option award that contains a market condition is estimated using a
lattice-based option valuation model, while all other option awards are valued using the
Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. We primarily consider the following assumptions when
using these models: (1) expected volatility, (2) expected dividends, (3) expected life and (4)
risk-free interest rate. Such models also consider the intrinsic value in the estimation of fair
value of the option award. Forfeitures are estimated when recognizing compensation expense, and
the estimate of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite service period to the extent that
actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated
forfeitures will be recognized through a cumulative catch-up adjustment in the period of change and
will also impact the amount of compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.
We measure the fair value of our stock option awards on the date of grant. The following
assumptions were used in the estimated grant date fair value calculations for stock options (no
stock option grants took place during fiscal 2006):
2007 | 2005 | |||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
3.25 | % | 4.1 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
22.19 | % | 27.6 | % | ||||
Dividend yield |
3.1 | % | 3.2 | % | ||||
Expected life (years) |
5.5 | 3 |
The expected stock price volatility rates were based on the historical volatility of our
common stock. The risk free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at
the time of grant for periods approximating the expected life of the option. The expected life
represents the average period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, as
calculated using the simplified method described in the Securities and Exchange Commissions Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 107.
The Black-Scholes-Merton and lattice-based option valuation models were developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. Because options held by our directors and employees have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, in our opinion, the existing models do not
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of these options.
Foreign Currency Translation and Remeasurement
Our foreign operations are subject to exchange rate fluctuations and foreign currency
transaction costs. The functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries is the United States
dollar. As a result, monetary assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange
rates as of the balance sheet date and non-monetary assets, liabilities and equity are translated
at historical rates. Sales and expenses are translated using a weighted-average exchange rate for
the period. Gains and losses resulting from those remeasurements
37
Table of Contents
are included in income. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are
also recognized currently in income. Total foreign currency gains and losses for each of the three
years ended October 31, 2007 did not exceed $0.1 million.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We believe that the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and
accounts payable approximates fair value based on either their short-term nature or on terms
currently available to the Company in financial markets. We believe that our fixed-rate long-term
obligations have a fair value of approximately $9.9 million as of October 31, 2007, with a
corresponding carrying value of approximately $10.4 million.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We do not presently engage in derivative or hedging activities. In addition, we have reviewed
agreements and contracts and have determined that we have no derivative instruments, nor do any of
our agreements and contracts contain embedded derivative instruments, as of October 31, 2007.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (FAS 141(R)).
This Statement provides greater consistency in the accounting and financial reporting of business combinations.
It requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in the transaction, establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, and requires the acquirer to disclose the nature and financial
effect of the business combination. FAS 141(R) is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We will adopt
FAS 141(R) no later than the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and are currently assessing
the impact the adoption will have on our financial position and results of operations.
In December
2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160. Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
(FAS 160). This Statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No.
51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest
in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. FAS 160
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We will adopt FAS 160
no later than the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and are currently assessing the impact the adoption will have on our financial position
and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, which permits entities to choose to measure at fair value eligible financial
instruments and certain other items that are not currently required to be measured at fair value.
The standard requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has
been elected be reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No. 159 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We will adopt SFAS No. 159 no later than the
first quarter of fiscal 2009. We are currently assessing the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 159
will have on our financial position and results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and
132(R). SFAS No. 158 requires company plan sponsors to display the net over- or under-funded
position of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability, with any unrecognized
prior service costs, transition obligations or actuarial gains/losses reported as a component of
other comprehensive income in shareholders equity. SFAS No. 158 is effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2006. We adopted the recognition provisions of SFAS No. 158 as of the
end of fiscal 2007. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 did not have a material effect on the Companys
financial position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles,
clarifies the definition of fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS
No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. However, the application of SFAS No. 157
may change current practice for some entities. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. We will adopt SFAS No. 157 in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. We are currently assessing
the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our financial position and results of
operations.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). This interpretation clarifies the
application of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, by defining a criterion that an
individual tax position must meet for any part of the benefit of that position to be recognized in
an enterprises financial statements and also provides guidance on measurement, derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, but earlier adoption is
permitted. We will adopt FIN 48 no later than the first quarter of fiscal 2008. We do not believe
the adoption of FIN 48 will have a significant impact on our financial position and results of
operations.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as all changes in a companys net assets, except
changes resulting from transactions with shareholders. For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007,
other comprehensive income includes the unrealized gain on our Limoneira investment totaling $9.4
million, net of income taxes. Limoneiras stock price at October 31, 2007 equaled $283.25 per
share. For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, other comprehensive loss includes the
unrealized loss on our Limoneira investment totaling $7.1 million, net of income taxes.
Limoneiras stock price at October 31, 2006 equaled $196 per share. For the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2005, other comprehensive income includes the unrealized gain on our Limoneira
investment totaling $13.4, net of income taxes. Limoneiras stock price at October 31, 2005
equaled $264 per share.
38
Table of Contents
Reclassifications
Certain items in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to
the current period presentation.
3. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
October 31, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Fresh fruit |
$ | 3,884 | $ | 4,961 | ||||
Packing supplies and ingredients |
2,389 | 2,380 | ||||||
Finished processed foods |
2,086 | 3,228 | ||||||
$ | 8,359 | $ | 10,569 | |||||
Cost of goods sold for fiscal year 2005 include inventory write-downs of $0.1 million.
Write-downs in fiscal 2005 primarily related to a reduction in the cost of pulp used in certain
processed avocado products. We did not have any write-downs in fiscal 2007 or fiscal 2006.
We assess the recoverability of inventories through an ongoing review of inventory levels in
relation to sales and forecasts and product marketing plans. When the inventory on hand, at the
time of the review, exceeds the foreseeable demand, the value of inventory that is not expected to
be sold is written down. The amount of the write-down is the excess of historical cost over
estimated realizable value (generally zero). Once established, these write-downs are considered
permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the excess inventory.
The assessment of the recoverability of inventories and the amounts of any write-downs are
based on currently available information and assumptions about future demand and market conditions.
Demand for processed avocado products may fluctuate significantly over time, and actual demand and
market conditions may be more or less favorable than our projections. In the event that actual
demand is lower than originally projected, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
We may retain and make available for sale some or all of the inventories which have been
written down. In the event that actual demand is higher than originally projected, we may be able
to sell a portion of these inventories in the future. We generally scrap inventories which have
been written down and are identified as obsolete.
4. Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
October 31, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Land |
$ | 947 | $ | 947 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
13,976 | 13,840 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
171 | 171 | ||||||
Equipment |
35,449 | 31,793 | ||||||
Information systems Hardware and software |
4,689 | 4,324 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
886 | 2,841 | ||||||
56,118 | 53,916 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(35,230 | ) | (34,008 | ) | ||||
$ | 20,888 | $ | 19,908 | |||||
Depreciation expense was $2.0 million, $1.9 million and $2.7 million for fiscal years 2007,
2006, and 2005.
5. Other Assets
During 1999, we established a Grower Development Program whereby funds can be advanced to
growers in exchange for their commitment to deliver a minimum volume of avocados on an annual
basis. These commitments to deliver fruit generally extend over a multi-year period. During
fiscal 2007, no amounts were advanced pursuant to this program and $2.7 million was included in
other assets as of October 31, 2007. During fiscal 2006 and as of October 31, 2006, we advanced
$3.3 million ($1.2 million was paid in cash, the remainder via receivable restructuring) to certain
growers. Advances are not repaid and are amortized to cost of goods sold
39
Table of Contents
over the term of the related agreements, up to a maximum of approximately 11 years. The
financial statements for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 include a charge of approximately
$304,000, $298,000 and $322,000 representing the amortization of these advances.
6. Revolving Credit Facilities
In July 2007 and October 2007, we renewed and extended our non-collateralized, revolving
credit facilities with Farm Credit West, PCA and Bank of America, N.A. These two credit facilities
now expire in February 2012 and July 2009. Under the terms of these agreements, we are advanced
funds for both working capital and long-term productive asset purchases. Total credit available
under these combined borrowing agreements was $30 million, with a weighted-average interest rate of
5.8% and 6.2% at October 31, 2007 and 2006. Under these credit facilities, we had $10.6 million
and $3.8 million outstanding as of October 31, 2007 and 2006, of which $4.0 million was classified
as a long-term liability as of October 31, 2007. See Note 12 for detail of long-term obligations. We had no long-term amounts outstanding pursuant
to these credit facilities as of October 31, 2006. These credit facilities contain various
financial covenants, the most significant relating to working capital, tangible net worth (as
defined), and Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) (as defined).
We were in compliance with all such covenants at October 31, 2007.
7. Employee Benefit Plans
We sponsor two defined contribution retirement plans for salaried and hourly employees.
Expenses for these plans approximated $543,000, $502,000, and $399,000 for fiscal years 2007, 2006
and 2005, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
financial statements.
We also sponsor a non-qualified defined benefit plan for two retired executives. Pension
expenses, net of actuarial gains, approximated $6,000 and $46,000 for the years ended October 31,
2007 and 2006. Pension expenses and actuarial losses approximated $65,000 for the year ended
October 31, 2005. These amounts are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in
the accompanying financial statements.
Components of the change in projected benefit obligation for fiscal year ends consist of the
following (in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Change in projected benefit obligation: |
||||||||
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year |
$ | 414 | $ | 510 | ||||
Interest cost |
23 | 29 | ||||||
Actuarial gain |
(29 | ) | (75 | ) | ||||
Benefits paid |
(47 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||
Projected benefit obligation at end of year (unfunded) |
$ | 361 | $ | 414 | ||||
The following is a reconciliation of the unfunded status of the plans at fiscal year ends
included in accrued expenses (in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Projected benefit obligation |
$ | 361 | $ | 414 | ||||
Unrecognized net (gain) loss |
| | ||||||
Recorded pension liabilities |
$ | 361 | $ | 414 | ||||
Significant assumptions used in the determination of pension expense consist of the following:
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Discount rate on projected benefit obligation |
6.00 | % | 6.00 | % |
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and guarantees
We lease facilities and certain equipment under non cancelable operating leases expiring at
various dates through 2021. We are committed to make minimum cash payments under these agreements
as of October 31, 2007 as follows (in thousands):
40
Table of Contents
2008 |
$ | 739 | ||
2009 |
646 | |||
2010 |
558 | |||
2011 |
398 | |||
2012 |
376 | |||
Thereafter |
2,002 | |||
$ | 4,719 | |||
In August 2006, we entered into an operating lease agreement with Columbia New Jersey
Commodore Industrial, LLC to rent approximately 30,000 square feet of building space in Swedesboro,
New Jersey. This lease enables us to not only invest in our ProRipeVIPTM avocado
ripening program, but also expand our refrigeration and storage capabilities. The lease has a term
of approximately 15 years and includes scheduled rent increases. Pursuant to FASB Technical
Bulletin 85-3, Accounting for Operating Leases with Scheduled Rent
Increases, our straight-line rent expense for such lease will approximate $13,000 per month for
the duration of such lease. This facility commenced operations during the first quarter of fiscal
2007.
Total rent expense amounted to approximately $1.5 million, $1.5 million and $1.2 million for
the years ended October 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005. Rent to Limoneira, for our corporate office,
amounted to approximately $0.2 million, $0.2 million, and $0.1 million for fiscal years 2007, 2006,
and 2005. We are committed to rent our corporate facility through fiscal 2015 at an annual rental
of $0.2 million per annum (subject to annual CPI increases, as defined).
We indemnify our directors and officers and have the power to indemnify each of our employees
and other agents, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law. The maximum amount of
potential future payments under such indemnifications is not determinable. No amounts have been
accrued in the accompanying financial statements.
Litigation
Hacienda Suit We
are currently under examination by the Mexican tax authorities (Hacienda)
for the tax year ended December 31, 2000 and December 31, 2004. We have received assessments
totaling approximately $2.0 million and $4.5 million from Hacienda related to the amount of income
at our Mexican subsidiary. Subsequent to that initial assessment, the Hacienda offered a
settlement of approximately $400,000 related to the tax year 2000 assessment, which we declined.
Based primarily on discussions with legal counsel and the evaluation of our claim, we maintain our
belief that the Haciendas position has no merit and that we will prevail. Accordingly, no amounts
have been provided in the financial statements as of October 31, 2007. We pledged our processed
products building located in Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico as collateral to the Hacienda in regards to
this assessment.
Processed Products suit During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company was named
defendant in a complaint filed with the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of
Los Angeles, seeking monetary damages of not less than $2.5 million stemming from packing services
performed on behalf of the complainant. The initial complaint stated various allegations,
including breach of contract, negligence, etc. Subsequent to that initial complaint, the court has
dismissed certain allegations. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, we settled such suit
out-of-court with a cash payment of $0.2 million.
We are also involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business that we do
not believe will have a material adverse impact on our financial statements.
9. Related-Party Transactions
We sell papayas procured from an entity owned by the Chairman of our Board of Directors and
CEO and President. Sales of papayas amounted to approximately $5,887,000, $4,822,000, and
$6,251,000 for the years ended October 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, resulting in gross margins of
approximately $547,000, $285,000, and $510,000. Net amounts due to this entity approximated
$438,000 and $213,000 at October 31, 2007 and 2006.
Certain members of our Board of Directors market avocados through Calavo pursuant to our
customary marketing agreements. During the years ended October 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, the
aggregate amount of avocados procured from entities owned or controlled by members of our Board of
Directors, was $9.7 million, $17.2 million, and $5.2 million. Accounts payable to these Board
members were $0.2 million and $0.6 million as of October 31, 2007 and 2006.
41
Table of Contents
During
fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, we received $0.4 million, $0.4 million, and $0.2 million as dividend income from Limoneira.
10. Income Taxes
The income tax provision consists of the following for the years ended October 31 (in
thousands):
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 2,865 | $ | 2,423 | $ | 3,046 | ||||||
State |
817 | 598 | 767 | |||||||||
Foreign |
211 | 63 | 293 | |||||||||
Total current |
3,893 | 3,084 | 4,106 | |||||||||
Deferred |
378 | 536 | (1,925 | ) | ||||||||
Total income tax provision |
$ | 4,271 | $ | 3,620 | $ | 2,181 | ||||||
At October 31, 2007 and 2006, gross deferred tax assets totaled approximately $3.1 million and
$2.9 million, while gross deferred tax liabilities totaled
approximately $11.3 million and $4.9
million. Deferred income taxes reflect the net of temporary differences between the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes.
Significant components of our deferred taxes as of October 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Allowances for accounts receivable |
$ | 2,021 | $ | 1,779 | ||||
Inventories |
127 | 292 | ||||||
State taxes |
126 | 62 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
251 | 215 | ||||||
Current deferred income taxes |
$ | 2,525 | $ | 2,348 | ||||
Property, plant, and equipment |
(1,029 | ) | (541 | ) | ||||
Intangible assets |
(180 | ) | (231 | ) | ||||
Unrealized Gain, Limoneira investment |
(9,848 | ) | (4,136 | ) | ||||
Retirement benefits |
150 | 177 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
287 | 340 | ||||||
Other |
(38 | ) | | |||||
Long-term deferred income taxes |
$ | (10,658 | ) | $ | (4,391 | ) | ||
A reconciliation of the significant differences between the federal statutory income tax rate
and the effective income tax rate on pretax income is as follows:
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Federal statutory tax rate |
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35 | % | ||||||
State taxes, net of federal effects |
5.0 | 4.8 | 4.7 | |||||||||
Foreign income taxes greater (less) than
U.S. |
(1.3 | ) | (0.8 | ) | 1.2 | |||||||
Benefit of lower federal tax brackets |
(0.7 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (1.6 | ) | ||||||
Other |
(1.2 | ) | 0.2 | 0.3 | ||||||||
36.8 | % | 38.5 | % | 39.6 | % | |||||||
We intend to reinvest our accumulated foreign earnings, which approximated $4.1 million at
October 31, 2007, indefinitely. As a result, we have not provided any deferred income taxes on
such unremitted earnings.
For fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, income before income taxes related to domestic
operations was approximately $10.6 million, $8.9 million, and $4.8 million. For fiscal years 2007,
2006 and 2005, income before income taxes related to foreign operations was approximately $1.0
million, $0.5 million and $0.7 million.
11. Segment Information
We report our operations in two different business segments: (1) fresh products and (2)
processed products. These two business segments are presented based on how information is used by
our president to measure performance and allocate resources. The fresh products segment includes
all operations that involve the distribution of avocados grown both inside and outside of
California, as well as the distribution of other non-processed, perishable food products. The
processed products segment represents all operations related to the purchase, manufacturing, and
distribution of processed avocado products. Additionally, selling, general and administrative
42
Table of Contents
expenses and non-operating line items are not charged directly, nor allocated to, a specific
product line. These items are now evaluated by our president only in aggregate. We do not
allocate assets, or specifically identify them to, our operating segments.
Fresh | Processed | Inter-segment | ||||||||||||||||||
products | products | eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||||
(All amounts are presented in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended October 31, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 274,345 | $ | 49,782 | $ | (21,143 | ) | $ | 302,984 | |||||||||||
Cost of sales |
252,884 | 39,471 | (21,143 | ) | 271,212 | |||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
$ | 21,461 | $ | 10,311 | $ | | $ | 31,772 | ||||||||||||
Year ended October 31, 2006 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 246,421 | $ | 43,061 | $ | (15,759 | ) | $ | 273,723 | |||||||||||
Cost of sales |
227,748 | 32,650 | (15,759 | ) | 244,639 | |||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
$ | 18,673 | $ | 10,411 | $ | | $ | 29,084 | ||||||||||||
Year ended October 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 246,139 | $ | 34,699 | $ | (22,016 | ) | $ | 258,822 | |||||||||||
Cost of sales |
229,068 | 30,036 | (22,016 | ) | 237,088 | |||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
$ | 17,071 | $ | 4,663 | $ | | $ | 21,734 | ||||||||||||
The following table sets forth sales by product category, by segment (in thousands):
Year ended October 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||
Fresh | Processed | |||||||||||
products | products | Total | ||||||||||
Third-party sales: |
||||||||||||
California avocados |
$ | 95,130 | $ | | $ | 95,130 | ||||||
Imported avocados |
120,588 | | 120,588 | |||||||||
Papayas |
5,887 | | 5,887 | |||||||||
Specialities and tropicals |
12,923 | | 12,923 | |||||||||
Processed food service |
| 38,338 | 38,338 | |||||||||
Processed retail and club |
| 10,706 | 10,706 | |||||||||
Total fruit and product sales to third-parties |
234,528 | 49,044 | 283,572 | |||||||||
Freight and other charges |
26,816 | 739 | 27,555 | |||||||||
Total third-party sales |
261,344 | 49,783 | 311,127 | |||||||||
Less sales incentives |
(19 | ) | (8,124 | ) | (8,143 | ) | ||||||
Total net sales to third-parties |
261,325 | 41,659 | 302,984 | |||||||||
Intercompany sales |
13,020 | 8,123 | 21,143 | |||||||||
Net sales before eliminations |
$ | 274,345 | $ | 49,782 | 324,127 | |||||||
Intercompany sales eliminations |
(21,143 | ) | ||||||||||
Consolidated net sales |
$ | 302,984 | ||||||||||
43
Table of Contents
Year ended October 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||
Fresh | Processed | |||||||||||
products | products | Total | ||||||||||
Third-party sales: |
||||||||||||
California avocados |
$ | 140,995 | $ | | $ | 140,995 | ||||||
Imported avocados |
51,191 | | 51,191 | |||||||||
Papayas |
4,822 | | 4,822 | |||||||||
Specialities and tropicals |
9,543 | | 9,543 | |||||||||
Processed food service |
| 34,021 | 34,021 | |||||||||
Processed retail and club |
| 10,454 | 10,454 | |||||||||
Total fruit and product sales to third-parties |
206,551 | 44,475 | 251,026 | |||||||||
Freight and other charges |
30,383 | 637 | 31,020 | |||||||||
Total third-party sales |
236,934 | 45,112 | 282,046 | |||||||||
Less sales incentives |
(45 | ) | (8,278 | ) | (8,323 | ) | ||||||
Total net sales to third-parties |
236,889 | 36,834 | 273,723 | |||||||||
Intercompany sales |
9,532 | 6,227 | 15,759 | |||||||||
Net sales before eliminations |
$ | 246,421 | $ | 43,061 | 289,482 | |||||||
Intercompany sales eliminations |
(15,759 | ) | ||||||||||
Consolidated net sales |
$ | 273,723 | ||||||||||
Year ended October 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||
Fresh | Processed | |||||||||||
Products | Products | Total | ||||||||||
Third-party sales: |
||||||||||||
California avocados |
$ | 104,481 | $ | | $ | 104,481 | ||||||
Imported avocados |
81,756 | | 81,756 | |||||||||
Papayas |
6,251 | | 6,251 | |||||||||
Specialities and tropicals |
13,777 | | 13,777 | |||||||||
Processed food service |
| 28,307 | 28,307 | |||||||||
Processed retail and club |
| 6,766 | 6,766 | |||||||||
Total fruit and product sales to third-parties |
206,265 | 35,073 | 241,338 | |||||||||
Freight and other charges |
24,129 | 258 | 24,387 | |||||||||
Total third-party sales |
230,394 | 35,331 | 265,725 | |||||||||
Less sales incentives |
(105 | ) | (6,798 | ) | (6,903 | ) | ||||||
Total net sales to third-parties |
230,289 | 28,533 | 258,822 | |||||||||
Intercompany sales |
15,850 | 6,166 | 22,016 | |||||||||
Net sales before eliminations |
$ | 246,139 | $ | 34,699 | 280,838 | |||||||
Intercompany sales eliminations |
(22,016 | ) | ||||||||||
Consolidated net sales |
$ | 258,822 | ||||||||||
Long-lived assets attributed to geographic areas as of October 31 are as follows (in
thousands):
United States | Mexico | Consolidated | ||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 69,325 | $ | 12,108 | $ | 81,433 | ||||||
2006 |
$ | 50,014 | $ | 11,703 | $ | 61,717 |
Sales to customers outside the United States were approximately $15.7 million, $13.8 million
and $15.9 million for the three years ended October 31, 2007.
44
Table of Contents
12. Long-Term Obligations
Long-term obligations at fiscal year ends consist of the following (in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Farm Credit West, PCA, term loan |
$ | 10,400 | $ | 11,700 | ||||
Farm Credit West, PCA, long-term portion of revolving credit facility (Note 6) |
4,000 | | ||||||
Other |
13 | 14 | ||||||
14,413 | 11,714 | |||||||
Less current portion |
(1,307 | ) | (1,308 | ) | ||||
$ | 13,106 | $ | 10,406 | |||||
In July 2005, we entered into a non-collateralized term loan agreement with Farm Credit West,
PCA to finance the purchase of our Limoneira Stock. Pursuant to such agreement, we borrowed $13.0
million, which is to be repaid in 10 annual installments of $1.3 million. Such annual installments
began July 2006 and continue through July 2015. Interest is paid monthly, in arrears, and began in
August 2005, and will continue through the life of the loan. Such loan bears interest at a fixed
rate of 5.70%.
Such term loan contains various financial covenants, the most significant relating to working
capital, tangible net worth (as defined), and Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and
Amortization (EBITDA) (as defined). We were in compliance with all such covenants at October 31,
2007.
At October 31, 2007, annual debt payments are scheduled as follows (in thousands):
Total | ||||
Year ending October 31: |
||||
2008 |
$ | 1,307 | ||
2009 |
2,306 | |||
2010 |
2,300 | |||
2011 |
2,300 | |||
2012 |
2,300 | |||
Thereafter |
3,900 | |||
$ | 14,413 | |||
13. Stock-Based Compensation
In November 2001, our Board of Directors approved two stock-based compensation plans.
The Directors Stock Option Plan
Participation in the directors stock option plan was limited to members of our Board of
Directors. The plan made available to the Board of Directors the right to grant options to
purchase up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock. In connection with the adoption of the plan, the
Board of Directors approved an award of fully vested options to purchase 1,240,000 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share.
A summary of stock option activity is as follows (in thousands, except for share amounts):
Weighted-Average | Aggregate | |||||||||||
Number of Shares | Exercise Price | Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||
Outstanding at October 31, 2004 |
155 | $ | 5.65 | |||||||||
Exercised |
(55 | ) | $ | 5.00 | ||||||||
Outstanding at October 31, 2005 |
100 | $ | 6.00 | |||||||||
Exercised |
(51 | ) | $ | 5.04 | ||||||||
Outstanding at October 31, 2006 |
49 | $ | 7.00 | |||||||||
Outstanding at October 31, 2007 |
49 | $ | 7.00 | $ | 780 | |||||||
Exercisable at October 31, 2007 |
49 | $ | 7.00 | $ | 780 | |||||||
The weighted average remaining life of such outstanding options is 1.14 years and the total
fair value of shares vested during the year ended October 31, 2007 was approximately $344,000.
We terminated this plan during fiscal 2007. Outstanding options were not be impacted by such
termination.
45
Table of Contents
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The employee stock purchase plan was approved by our Board of Directors and shareholders.
Participation in the employee stock purchase plan is limited to employees. The plan provides the
Board of Directors, or a plan administrator, the right to make available up to 2,000,000 shares of
common stock at a price not less than fair market value. In March 2002, the Board of Directors
awarded selected employees the opportunity to purchase up to 474,000 shares of common stock at
$7.00 per share, the closing price of our common stock on the date prior to the grant. The plan
also permits us to advance all or some of the purchase price of the purchased stock to the employee
upon the execution of a full-recourse note at prevailing interest rates. These awards expired in
April 2002, with 84 participating employees electing to purchase approximately 279,000 shares.
There was no activity related to such plan during fiscal 2007.
The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan
The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan of Calavo Growers, Inc. (the 2005 Plan) was approved by our
Board of Directors and shareholders. The 2005 Plan authorizes the granting of the following types
of awards to persons who are employees, officers, consultants, advisors, or directors of Calavo
Growers, Inc. or any of its affiliates:
| Incentive stock options that are intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations thereunder; | |
| Non-qualified stock options that are not intended to be incentive stock options; and | |
| Shares of common stock that are subject to specified restrictions |
Subject to the adjustment provisions of the 2005 Plan that are applicable in the event of a
stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or similar transaction, up to 2,500,000 shares of
common stock may be issued under the 2005 Plan and no person shall be granted awards under the 2005
Plan during any 12-month period that cover more then 500,000 shares of common stock.
In December 2006, our Board of Directors approved the issuance of options to acquire a total
of 20,000 shares of our common stock to two members of our Board of Directors. Each grant to
acquire 10,000 shares vests in increments of 2,000 per annum over a five-year period and have an
exercise price of $10.46 per share. Vested options have a term of five years from the vesting
date. The market price of our common stock at the grant date was $10.46. The estimated fair
market value of such option grant was approximately $40,000. The total compensation cost not yet
recognized as of October 31, 2007 was $32,000. Such will be recognized over the remaining service
period of 49 months.
A summary of stock option activity is as follows (in thousands, except for share amounts):
Weighted-Average | Weighted-Average | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Number of Shares | Exercise Price | Fair-Value | Intrinsic Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at October 31, 2004 |
| |||||||||||||||
Granted |
400 | $ | 9.10 | $1.65/share | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at October 31, 2005 |
400 | $ | 9.10 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(9 | ) | $ | 9.10 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at October 31, 2006 |
391 | $ | 9.10 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
20 | $ | 10.46 | $2.06/share | ||||||||||||
Exercised |
(78 | ) | $ | 9.10 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at October 31, 2007 |
333 | $ | 9.18 | $ | 4,572 | |||||||||||
Exercisable at October 31, 2007 |
313 | $ | 9.10 | $ | 4,323 | |||||||||||
The weighted average remaining life of such outstanding options is 2.9 years and the total
intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal 2007 was $712,000. The fair value of shares
vested during the year ended October 31, 2006 was approximately $4.0 million.
14. Dividends
On January 2, 2008, we paid a $0.35 per share dividend in the aggregate amount of $5.0 million
to shareholders of record on December 15, 2007. On January 2, 2007, we paid a $0.32 per share
dividend in the aggregate amount of $4.6 million to shareholders of record on December 15, 2006.
46
Table of Contents
15. Joint Venture in Maui Fresh International, LLC
In August 2006, we entered into a joint venture agreement with San Rafael Distributing (SRD)
for the purpose of the wholesale marketing, sale and distribution of fresh produce from the
existing location of SRD at the Los Angeles Wholesale Produce Market (Terminal Market), located in
Los Angeles, California. Such joint venture operates under the name of Maui Fresh International,
LLC (Maui Fresh LLC) and commenced operations in August 2006. SRD and Calavo each have an equal
one-half ownership interest in Maui Fresh, but SRD shall have overall management responsibility for
the operations of Maui Fresh at the Terminal Market. Therefore, pursuant to Accounting Principles
Board (ABP) 18 and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 03-16, we believe that our level of economic
influence is that of significant. As such, we will use the equity method to account for our
investment.
Commencing on the first anniversary of this agreement and continuing thereafter during the
term of the agreement, Calavo shall have the unconditional right, but not the obligation, to
purchase the one-half interest in Maui Fresh owned by SRD at a purchase price to be determined
pursuant to the agreement. The term of the agreement is for five years, which may be extended, or
terminated early, as defined. As of October 31, 2007, we have advanced Maui Fresh approximately
$0.5 million (included in prepaid expenses and other current assets) for working capital purposes.
Per the agreement, these advances were made at our own discretion and are expected to be paid back in cash.
16. Agreements with Tomato Grower
In June 2007, we entered into a distribution agreement with Agricola Belher (Belher) of
Mexico, a well-established quality producer of fresh vegetables, primarily tomatoes, for export to
the U.S. market. Pursuant to such distribution agreement, Belher agreed, at their sole cost and
expense, to harvest, pack, export, ship, and deliver tomatoes exclusively to our Arizona facility.
In exchange, we agreed to sell and distribute such tomatoes, advance $2 million to Belher for
operating purposes, provide additional advances as shipments are made during the season (subject to
limitations, as defined), and return the proceeds from such tomato sales to Belher, net of our
commission and aforementioned advances. The agreement also allows for us to advance additional
amounts to Belher at our sole discretion. All advances that remain outstanding as of June 2008 are
immediately due and payable. As of October 31, 2007, we have advanced $2 million to Belher
(included in advances to suppliers) pursuant to this agreement. Pursuant to EITF 99-19, Reporting
Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent, we will record gross revenues related to this
agreement, as we believe we are acting more like the principal in these sales transactions.(principally primary
obligor, inventory loss and delivery risk, latitude in establishing prices, and determination of product specifications).
Concurrently, we also entered into an infrastructure agreement in June 2007 with Belher in
order to significantly increase production yields and fruit quality. Pursuant to this agreement,
we are to advance up to $5 million to be used solely for the acquisition, construction, and
installation of improvements to and on certain land owned by Belher, as well as packing line
equipment. Advances incur interest at 9.4% at October 31, 2007. We advanced $5.0 million as of
October 31, 2007 ($1.0 million included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and $4.0
million included in other long-term assets). Belher is to annually repay these advances in no less than 20% increments through July 2012. In addition, the agreement allows for additional $1.0 million
advances to take place during the last five months of each of our fiscal years 2008 through 2010,
but they are subject to certain conditions and are to be made at our sole discretion. Belher is to
annually repay these advances in full on or before each of July 2008 through July 2010. Interest is to be paid monthly
or annually, as defined. Belher may prepay, without penalty, all or any portion of the advances at any time.
In order to secure their obligations pursuant to both agreements discussed above, Belher
granted us a first-priority security interest in certain assets, including cash, inventory and
fixed assets, as defined.
17. Subsequent Events
Effective November 2007, we entered into a consignment and marketing agreement with Farmers
Fresh Mushroom, Inc (FFMI) to market and sell conventional and organic mushrooms in the United
States. FFMI agreed, among other things, to source, pack, and ship product primarily to our
customers, but also to any of our distribution centers, at our option. In exchange, we agreed,
among other things, to market and sell such product. The agreement specifically calls for FFMI to
not actively pursue new business in the United States of America and it also requires that all
product sold by us will be packed in our cartons and sold only by us.
The term of this agreement is for 12 months (through October 2008) and automatically renews
for a 12-month period on the final day of the agreement, unless terminated, as defined.
Effective December 2007, we entered into a consignment and marketing agreement with Maui
Pineapple Company, LTD. (MPC) to market and sell Maui Gold Pineapples throughout the continental
United States and Canada. MPC agreed, among other things, to source, pack and ship such pineapples
to an agreed port of entry. In exchange, we agreed, among other things, to be responsible for such
product upon arrival at the port, to market and sell the related product, and to develop and
implement marketing strategies aimed
47
Table of Contents
at building the Maui Gold brand recognition. The agreement specifically calls for us to be
the sole and exclusive source for the sale of Maui Gold Pineapples. Additionally, Maui Gold
Pineapples are to be our sole fresh pineapple product.
The agreement calls for us to provide certain advances, as defined, and return the proceeds
from such pineapple sales to MPC, net of our commission, fees, and incentives, if applicable. The
term of this agreement is for 13 months (through December 2008) and automatically renews for a
12-month period, unless terminated, as defined.
48
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Calavo Growers, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Calavo Growers, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of October 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders equity, and cash flows for the
years then ended. Our audits also included the 2007 and 2006 financial statement schedule listed
at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Calavo Growers, Inc. and subsidiaries at October
31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the
years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our
opinion, the related 2007 and 2006 financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, Calavo Growers, Inc. changed its
method of accounting for Share-Based Payments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) on November 1, 2005.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Calavo Growers Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of
October 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated January
11, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP | ||||
Woodland Hills, California
January 11, 2008
January 11, 2008
49
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Calavo Growers, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
income, comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows of Calavo Growers, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) for
the year ended October 31, 2005. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed at
Item 15(a)(2) of Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2005. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audit.
We conducted
our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of the Company and subsidiaries for the year ended October 31, 2005,
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule for the year ended October
31, 2005, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP | ||||
Los Angeles, California
January 31, 2006
50
Table of Contents
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of October 31, 2007.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision
and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this report based on the
framework set forth in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework
set forth in Internal Control Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal
control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2007. Our internal control over
financial reporting as of October 31, 2007 has been audited by Ernst and Young LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
51
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Calavo Growers, Inc.
We have audited Calavo Growers, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31,
2007, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Calavo
Growers, Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Calavo Growers, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2007, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), consolidated balance sheets of Calavo Growers, Inc. as of October 31, 2007
and 2006 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss),
shareholders equity, and cash flows for years then ended of Calavo Growers Inc., and our report
dated January 11, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP | ||||
Woodland Hills, California
January 11, 2008
January 11, 2008
52
Table of Contents
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended October 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Annual Report because we will
file a definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Regulation 14A
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Proxy Statement), not later than 120 days after the
end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report, and the applicable information included in
the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers of the Registrant, and Corporate
Governance
The names of our executive officers and their ages, titles and biographies are incorporated by reference from Part 1, above.
The following information is included in our Notice of Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days after our fiscal year end of October 31, 2007 (the Proxy Statement) and is incorporated herein by reference:
| Information regarding our directors who are standing for reelection and any persons nominated to become our directors is set forth under Election of Directors. | ||
| Information regarding our Audit Committee and designated audit committee financial expert is set forth under Corporate Governance Principles and Board MattersBoard Structure and Committee CompositionAudit Committee. | ||
| Information on our code of ethics for directors, officers and employees and our Corporate Governance Guidelines is set forth under Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters. | ||
| Information regarding Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance is set forth under Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance. |
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections
entitled Executive Compensation and Directors Compensation in the Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections
entitled Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Equity Compensation
Plan Information in the Proxy Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section
entitled Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in the Proxy Statement.
Item 14. Principal Accountants Fees and Services
Information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section of the
Proxy Statement entitled Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
53
Table of Contents
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) (1) Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements as of October 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each
of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2007 are included herewith:
Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss), Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Consolidated Statements of
Shareholders Equity, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Report of Ernst & Young LLP,
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, and Report of Deloitte & Touche LLP,
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
(2) Supplemental Schedules
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present in
amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the required information
is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
2.1
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated as of February 20, 2001 between Calavo Growers, Inc. and Calavo Growers of California.1 | |||
2.2
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 7, 2003 Among Calavo Growers, Inc., Calavo Acquisition, Inc., Maui Fresh International, Inc. and Arthur J. Bruno, Robert J. Bruno and Javier J. Badillo7 | |||
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation of Calavo Growers, Inc. 1 | |||
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Calavo Growers, Inc.3 | |||
10.1
|
Form of Marketing Agreement for Calavo Growers, Inc.8 | |||
10.2
|
Marketing Agreement dated as of April 1, 1996 between Tropical Hawaiian Products, Inc., a Hawaiian corporation, and Calavo Growers of California. 1 | |||
10.3
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of June 1, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 | |||
10.4
|
Lease Agreement dated as of November 21, 1997, between Tede S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, and Calavo de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, including attached Guaranty of Calavo Growers of California dated December 16, 1996.1 | |||
10.5
|
Lease agreement dated as of February 15, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 | |||
10.6
|
Standstill agreement dated June 1, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 | |||
10.7
|
Standstill agreement dated June 1, 2005 between Calavo Growers, Inc. And Limoneira Company4 | |||
10.8
|
Term Loan Agreement dated July 1, 2005, between Farm Credit West, PCA, and Calavo Growers, Inc.5 | |||
10.9
|
2005 Stock Incentive Plan Of Calavo Growers, Inc.6 | |||
10.10
|
Calavo Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated March 11, 1989 between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of California. 1 | |||
10.11
|
Amendment to the Calavo Growers of California Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated November 9, 1993 Between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of California. 1 | |||
10.12
|
2001 Stock Option Plan for Directors.2 | |||
10.13
|
2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Officers and Employees.2 |
54
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
10.14
|
Term Revolving Credit Agreement between Farm Credit West, PCA and Calavo Growers, Inc., dated June 7, 200711 | |||
10.15
|
Business Loan Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. and Calavo Growers, Inc., dated October 15, 20079 | |||
10.16
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement10 | |||
21.1
|
Subsidiaries of Calavo Growers, Inc. 1 | |||
23.1
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. | |||
23.2
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. | |||
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) | |||
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) | |||
32
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
1 | Previously filed on April 24, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-59418, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
2 | Previously filed on December 18, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-75378, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
3 | Previously filed on December 19, 2002 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
4 | Previously filed on June 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. | |
5 | Previously filed on September 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. | |
6 | Previously filed on March 21, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF14A and incorporated herein by reference. | |
7 | Previously filed on January 23, 2004 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. | |
8 | Previously filed on January 28, 2003 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. | |
9 | Previously filed on October 19, 2007 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 8K and incorporated herein by reference. | |
10 | Previously filed on September 11, 2006 as an exhibit to the Registrant's Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. | |
11 | Previously filed on July 3, 2007 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 8K and incorporated herein by reference. |
(b) Exhibits
See subsection (a) (3) above.
(c) Financial Statement Schedules
See subsection (a) (1) and (2) above.
55
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, on January 14, 2008.
CALAVO GROWERS, INC |
||||
By: | /s/ Lecil E. Cole | |||
Lecil E. Cole | ||||
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President |
||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below on January 14, 2008 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities indicated:
Signature | Title | |
/s/ Lecil E. Cole |
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
/s/ Arthur J. Bruno |
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
/s/ James E. Snyder |
Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
/s/ Donald M. Sanders |
Director | |
/s/ Fred J. Ferrazzano |
Director | |
/s/ John M. Hunt |
Director | |
/s/ George H. Barnes |
Director | |
/s/ J. Link Leavens |
Director | |
/s/ Alva V. Snider |
Director | |
/s/ Michael D. Hause |
Director | |
/s/ Dorcas H. McFarlane |
Director | |
/s/ Egidio Carbone, Jr |
Director | |
/s/ Alan Van Wagner |
Director | |
/s/ Harold Edwards |
Director | |
/s/ Scott Van Der Kar |
Director |
56
Table of Contents
SCHEDULE II
CALAVO GROWERS, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (in thousands)
Fiscal year | Balance at | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||
ended | beginning | end | ||||||||||||||||||
October 31: | of year | Additions(1) | Deductions(2) | of year | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for customer deductions |
2005 | $ | 1,022 | $ | 6,791 | $ | 5,663 | $ | 2,150 | |||||||||||
2006 | 2,150 | 5,147 | 5,952 | 1,345 | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | 1,345 | 6,449 | 6,465 | 1,329 | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
2005 | 65 | 475 | 2 | 538 | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 538 | 56 | 106 | 488 | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | 488 | 473 | 19 | 942 |
(1) | Charged to net sales (customer deductions) or costs and expenses (doubtful accounts). | |
(2) | Write-off of assets or collection of previously written-off assets |
57
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
2.1
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated as of February 20, 2001 between Calavo Growers, Inc. and Calavo Growers of California.1 | |||
2.2
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 7, 2003 Among Calavo Growers, Inc., Calavo Acquisition, Inc., Maui Fresh International, Inc. and Arthur J. Bruno, Robert J. Bruno and Javier J. Badillo7 | |||
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation of Calavo Growers, Inc. 1 | |||
3.2
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Calavo Growers, Inc.3 | |||
10.1
|
Form of Marketing Agreement for Calavo Growers, Inc.8 | |||
10.2
|
Marketing Agreement dated as of April 1, 1996 between Tropical Hawaiian Products, Inc., a Hawaiian corporation, and Calavo Growers of California. 1 | |||
10.3
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of June 1, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 | |||
10.4
|
Lease Agreement dated as of November 21, 1997, between Tede S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, and Calavo de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, including attached Guaranty of Calavo Growers of California dated December 16, 1996.1 | |||
10.5
|
Lease agreement dated as of February 15, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 | |||
10.6
|
Standstill agreement dated June 1, 2005, between Limoneira Company and Calavo Growers, Inc.4 | |||
10.7
|
Standstill agreement dated June 1, 2005 between Calavo Growers, Inc. And Limoneira Company4 | |||
10.8
|
Term Loan Agreement dated July 1, 2005, between Farm Credit West, PCA, and Calavo Growers, Inc.5 | |||
10.9
|
2005 Stock Incentive Plan Of Calavo Growers, Inc.6 | |||
10.10
|
Calavo Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated March 11, 1989 between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of California. 1 | |||
10.11
|
Amendment to the Calavo Growers of California Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement dated November 9, 1993 Between Egidio Carbone, Jr. and Calavo Growers of California. 1 | |||
10.12
|
2001 Stock Option Plan for Directors.2 | |||
10.13
|
2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Officers and Employees.2 | |||
10.14
|
Term Revolving Credit Agreement between Farm Credit West, PCA and Calavo Growers, Inc., dated June 7, 200711 | |||
10.15
|
Business Loan Agreement between Bank of America, N.A. and Calavo Growers, Inc., dated October 15, 20079 | |||
10.16
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement10 | |||
21.1
|
Subsidiaries of Calavo Growers, Inc. 1 | |||
23.1
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. | |||
23.2
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. | |||
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) | |||
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) | |||
32
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
1 | Previously filed on April 24, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-59418, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
2 | Previously filed on December 18, 2001 as an exhibit to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-75378, and incorporated herein by reference. | |
3 | Previously filed on December 19, 2002 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference. |
58
Table of Contents
4 | Previously filed on June 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. | |
5 | Previously filed on September 9, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. | |
6 | Previously filed on March 21, 2005 as an exhibit to the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF14A and incorporated herein by reference. | |
7 | Previously filed on January 23, 2004 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. | |
8 | Previously filed on January 28, 2003 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10K and incorporated herein by reference. | |
9 | Previously filed on October 19, 2007 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 8K and incorporated herein by reference. | |
10 | Previously filed on September 11, 2006 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 10Q and incorporated herein by reference. | |
11 | Previously filed on July 3, 2007 as an exhibit to the Registrants Report on Form 8K and incorporated herein by reference. |
59