CALIFORNIA FIRST LEASING CORP - Quarter Report: 2004 September (Form 10-Q)

3

The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements.

5

NOTE 1- BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004. The material under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is written with the presumption that the readers have read or have access to the 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which contains Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as of June 30, 2004 and for the year then ended.

In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the balance sheet as of September 30, 2004 and the statements of earnings and cash flows for the three month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. The results of operations for the three month period ended September 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the entire fiscal year ending June 30, 2005.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the first quarter of fiscal 2004 financial statements to conform to the presentation of the first quarter of fiscal 2005 financial statements.

NOTE 2 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

At September 30, 2004, the Company had two stock option plans, which are more fully described in Note 1 in the Company's 2004 Annual Report on form 10-K. The Company accounts for these Plans under APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stocks Issued to Employees," under which no compensation cost has been recognized. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123"), as amended by SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure," ("SFAS No. 148") the Company adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148. Had compensation cost for these plans been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, the Company's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the following proforma amounts:

Since the SFAS No. 123 method of accounting has not been applied to options granted prior to July 1, 1995, the resulting pro forma compensation cost may not be indicative of that to be expected in future periods.

On March 31, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), issued “Exposure Draft, Share-based Payment” with the objective of achieving a global standard on equity-based compensation. The proposed Statement addresses the accounting for share-based transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for either equity instruments of the enterprise or liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of equity instruments. The proposed Statement would eliminate the ability to account for share-based compensation using APB Opinion 25. The proposed Statement would be applied prospectively for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2004. The proposed Statement’s impact to the Company’s financial statements would be dependent on stock grants issued and cannot be determined at this time.

6

NOTE 3 - SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company has two leasing subsidiaries, California First Leasing Corporation (“CalFirst Leasing”) and Amplicon, Inc. (“Amplicon”), collectively the “Leasing Companies”. The Company has a bank subsidiary, California First National Bank (“CalFirst Bank” or the “Bank”), which is an FDIC-insured national bank.

Below is a summary of each segment’s financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 and 2003:

NOTE 4 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” (“EITF 03-1”), provides application guidance that should be used to determine when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other-than-temporary, and the recognition of an impairment loss. The guidance also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. In September 2004, the FASB delayed certain accounting requirements of EITF 03-1 until additional implementation guidance is issued and goes into effect.

7

          California First National Bancorp, a California corporation (the "Company"), is a bank holding company headquartered in Orange County, California. The Leasing Companies and CalFirst Bank focus on leasing and financing capital assets, primarily computers, computer networks and other high technology assets, through centralized marketing programs designed to offer cost-effective leasing alternatives. Leased assets are re-marketed at lease expiration. CalFirst Bank also provides business loans to fund the purchase of assets leased by third parties, including the Leasing Companies. CalFirst Bank gathers deposits using the telephone, the Internet, and direct mail from a centralized location.

          The Company's direct finance income includes interest income earned on the Company's investment in lease receivables and residuals. Other income primarily includes gains realized on the sale of leased property, income from sales-type and operating leases and gains realized on the sale of leases, and other fee income. Income from sales-type leases relates to the re-lease of off-lease property ("lease extensions") and new lease transactions that qualify as sales-type leases, generally where the fair value of the property subject to the lease differs from the Company's carrying cost. Income from operating leases generally involves the re-lease of off-lease property that is booked as an operating lease rather than as a sales-type lease.

          The Company's operating results are subject to quarterly fluctuations resulting from a variety of factors, including the volume of new lease originations, the volume and profitability of leased property being re-marketed through re-lease or sale, variations in the mix of lease originations, the size and credit quality of the lease portfolio, interest rates and economic conditions in general. The Company's principal market risk exposure is interest rate risk, which is the exposure due to differences in the repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The Company's balance sheet structure is primarily short-term in nature, with a greater portion of assets that reprice or mature within one year. As a result, the Company's exposure to interest rate risk largely results from declines in interest rates and the impact on net direct finance and interest income.

          The Company conducts its leasing business in a manner designed to mitigate risks. However, the assumption of risk is a key source of earnings in the leasing and banking industries and the Company is subject to risks through its investment in lease receivables held in its own portfolio, lease transactions in process, and residual investments. The Company takes steps to manage risks through the implementation of strict credit management processes and on-going risk management review procedures.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

          The preparation of the Company's financial statements requires management to make certain critical accounting estimates that impact the stated amount of assets and liabilities at a financial statement date and the reported amount of income and expenses during a reporting period. These accounting estimates are based on management's judgment and are considered to be critical because of their significance to the financial statements and the possibility that future events may differ from current judgments, or that the use of different assumptions could result in materially different estimates. The critical accounting policies and estimates have not changed from and should be read in conjunction with the Company's Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004.

          The Company's estimates are reviewed continuously to ensure reasonableness. However, the amounts the Company may ultimately realize could differ from such estimated amounts.

Overview of Results and Trends

          The following discussion is provided in addition to the required analysis of earnings in order to discuss trends in our business. We believe this analysis provides additional meaningful information on a comparative basis.

          The results for the first quarter of fiscal 2005 primarily reflect the impact of a smaller portfolio of assets reaching the end of term, which resulted in a 16% decline in other income. In addition, lower yields earned on the lease portfolio and delays in the completion of transactions in process contributed to a decrease in direct finance income, which was not offset by the benefit of no provision for lease losses during the quarter. The Company’s investment in capital leases performed well, exhibiting a smaller level of delinquent and problem leases than at the end of the prior quarter and year.

8

          The Company has continued efforts to increase the investment in capital leases, with significant attention placed on expanding the level of lease originations. During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, lease originations were 10% below the level of the first quarter of the prior year. However, the backlog of approved transactions was up 20% from the year before, and property acquired for transactions in process was up 46% to $44 million. These indicators should point toward a higher level of lease bookings over the next few quarters and growth in the investment in capital leases, which over time should produce increases in the level of direct finance income.

Consolidated Statement of Earnings Analysis

          Summary -- For the first quarter ended September 30, 2004, net earnings of $1.6 million declined 30% from $2.3 million for the first quarter ended September 30, 2003. Diluted earnings per share decreased 33% to $.14 for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, compared to $.21 per share for the same quarter of the prior year. The larger decrease in diluted earnings per share compared to net earnings reflects the impact of a larger number of diluted shares outstanding during the period resulting from an increase in the average stock price during the first quarter of fiscal 2005 when compared to the first quarter of the prior year. The volume of new lease transactions booked during the quarter was approximately $30 million, which was up 31% from the same quarter of the prior year

          Net Direct Finance and Interest Income -- Net direct finance and interest income is the difference between interest earned on the investment in capital leases, securities and other interest earning investments and interest paid on deposits or other borrowings. Net direct finance and interest income is affected by changes in the volume and mix of interest earning assets, the movement of interest rates, and funding and pricing strategies.

          Net direct finance and interest income was $4.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, compared to $4.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, a decrease of $329,000. Direct finance income of $4.2 million decreased by $408,000 as a result of lower yields earned on a higher average investment in capital leases held in the Company's own portfolio. The increase of $180,000 in interest and investment income is due to improved yields on slightly lower investment balances. Investment income in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 had been negatively impacted by the volatility of short-term interest rates during the quarter. Interest expense on deposits was $165,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to $64,000 for the same quarter of the prior year, reflecting a 189% increase in the average balances of interest bearing deposits which offset a slight decrease in the average interest rates paid.

          The following table presents the components of the increases (decreases) in net direct finance and interest income before provision for lease losses by volume and rate:

9

          The following table presents the Company's average balance sheets, direct finance income and interest earned or interest paid, the related yields and rates on major categories of the Company's interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Yields/rates are presented on an annualized basis.

(1) Direct finance income and interest expense on average discounted lease rentals and non-recourse debt of $15.9 million and $36.1 million at September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, offset each other and do not contribute to the Company's net direct finance and interest income.

(2) Average balance is based on month-end balances, and includes non-accrual leases, and is presented net of unearned income.

          Provision for Lease Losses -- The Company did not have a provision for lease losses in the first quarter of fiscal 2005, compared to $78,000 for the same period in the prior year. The lack of a provision largely relates to the fact that the overall level of reserves required against problem leases remained relatively unchanged during the quarter. This stability reflects the favorable resolution of one major problem account and the continued pay down on other problem leases, which offset other new problems identified.

          Other Income -- Other income is a significant source of earnings for the Company, accounting for 42% of the Company's gross profit during the quarter ended September 30, 2004 and 45% during the first quarter of the prior fiscal year. Total other income for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 decreased $610,000, or 16%, to $3.1 million, compared to $3.7 million for the same quarter of the prior fiscal year, and is directly related to the lower volume of leases reaching their end of term during the quarter. Income from the sale of leases and leased property decreased $369,000, reflecting a decrease in income from a lower volume of leased property sales. Operating and sales type lease income declined $147,000 due to a lower volume of lease extensions. Other fee income declined $94,000.

10

           Selling, General and Administrative Expenses -- The Company's selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") increased $266,000, or 6%, to $4.9 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to $4.6 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The increase in SG&A expenses is due to higher costs related to the development of the sales organization, expanded marketing programs and higher expense related to updating systems and facilities.

          Income Taxes -- Income taxes were accrued at a tax rate of 38.5% for each of the fiscal quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, representing the Company's estimated annual tax rates for each respective fiscal year.

FINANCIAL CONDITION ANALYSIS

Lease Portfolio Analysis

          The Company's risk assets are comprised almost exclusively of leases for capital assets to businesses and other commercial or non-profit organizations. All leases are secured by the underlying property being leased. The Company's strategy is to develop lease portfolios with risk/reward profiles that meet its objectives. A portion of lease originations are discounted to banks or finance companies on a non-recourse basis at fixed interest rates. Over the past three fiscal years, the Company has funded a significantly greater percentage of new lease transactions internally. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, approximately 82% of the total dollar amount of new leases booked by the Company were held in its own portfolios, compared to 96% during the first quarter of fiscal 2004. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, the Company's net investment in capital leases decreased by $5.4 million due to a $5.2 million decrease in the Company's investment in lease receivables, and a $261,000 reduction in the investment in estimated residual values. The decrease in the investment in capital leases is primarily due to portfolio run-off at a greater rate than new lease transactions were booked and retained by the Company.

          The Company often makes payments to purchase leased property prior to the commencement of the lease. The disbursements for these lease transactions in process are generally made to facilitate the lessee's property implementation schedule. The lessee is contractually obligated by the lease to make rental payments directly to the Company during the period that the transaction is in process, and the lessee is generally obligated to reimburse the Company for all disbursements under certain circumstances. At September 30, 2004, the Company's investment in property acquired for transactions in process was $44.4 million related to approximately $122.0 million of approved lease commitments. This investment in transactions in process reflected an increase of $13.9 million from $30.5 million at June 30, 2004 related to approved lease commitments of approximately $113.3 million, and an increase from $23.0 million at September 30, 2003.

          The following table summarizes various contractual obligations to make and receive future payments as of September 30, 2004. Commitments to purchase property for leases are binding and generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since the Company expects some of the commitments to expire without being funded, the total amounts do not necessarily represent the Company's future liquidity requirements.

11

          The Company monitors the performance of all leases held in its own portfolio, transactions in process, as well as lease transactions assigned to lenders, if the Company retains a residual investment in the leased property subject to those leases. An ongoing review of all leases ten or more days delinquent is conducted. Lessees who are delinquent with the Company or an assignee are coded in the Company's accounting and tracking systems in order to provide management visibility, periodic reporting, and appropriate reserves. The accrual of interest income on leases will generally be discontinued when the lessee becomes ninety days or more past due on its lease payments with the Company, unless the Company believes the investment is otherwise recoverable. Leases may be placed on non-accrual earlier if the Company has significant doubt about the ability of the lessee to meet its lease obligations, as evidenced by consistent delinquency, deterioration in the lessee's financial condition or other relevant factors.

The following table summarizes the Company's non-performing capital leases:

          In addition to the non-performing capital leases identified above, there was $1.6 million of investment in capital leases at September 30, 2004 for which management has concerns regarding the ability of the lessees to continue to meet existing lease obligations, compared with $1.5 million at June 30, 2004. This amount consists of leases classified as substandard or doubtful, or with lessees that currently are experiencing financial difficulties or that management believes may experience financial difficulties in the future. Although these leases have been identified as potential problem leases, they may never become non-performing. These potential problem leases are considered in the determination of the allowance for lease losses.

Allowance for Lease Losses

          The allowance for lease losses provides coverage for probable and estimatable losses in the Company's lease portfolios. The allowance recorded is based on a quarterly review of all leases outstanding and transactions in process. Lease receivables or residuals are charged off when they are deemed completely uncollectible. The determination of the appropriate amount of any provision is based on management's judgment at that time and takes into consideration all known relevant internal and external factors that may affect the lease portfolio.

          The allowance for lease losses decreased $126,000 to $3.3 million (2.2% of net investment in capital leases before allowances) at September 30, 2004 from $3.5 million (2.2% of net investment in capital leases before allowances) at June 30, 2004. This allowance consisted of $1.1 million allocated to specific accounts and $2.2 million that was unallocated. The reduction in the allowance at September 30, 2004 primarily relates to a reduction in specific non-performing leases due to the favorable resolution of one major account in bankruptcy and the application of payments received related to other problem accounts, which amounts offset new problems identified. The Company considers the allowance for lease losses of $3.3 million at September 30, 2004 adequate to cover losses specifically identified as well as inherent in the lease portfolios. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will not, in any particular period, sustain lease losses that are sizeable in relation to the amount reserved, or that subsequent evaluations of the lease portfolio, in light of factors then prevailing, including economic conditions and the on-going credit review process, will not require significant increases in the allowance for lease losses. Among other factors, economic and political events may have an adverse impact on the adequacy of the allowance for lease losses by increasing credit risk and the risk of potential loss even further. As the Company has retained a significantly greater percentage of leases in its own portfolio, this creates increased exposure to delinquencies, repossessions, foreclosures and losses than the Company has historically experienced.

12

Investment Securities

          The amortized cost, fair value, and carrying value of investment securities at September 30, 2004 were as follows:

Liquidity and Capital Resources

          The Company funds its operating activities through internally generated funds, bank deposits and non-recourse debt. At September 30, 2004 and June 30, 2004, the Company's cash and cash equivalents were $64.4 million and $64.9 million, respectively. Stockholders' equity at September 30, 2004 was $204.4 million, or 72% of total assets, compared to $203.8 million, or 74% of total assets, at June 30, 2004. At September 30, 2004, the Company and the Bank exceed their regulatory capital requirements and are considered "well-capitalized" under guidelines established by the FRB and OCC.

          Deposits at CalFirst Bank totaled $32.5 million at September 30, 2004, compared to $13.5 million at September 30, 2003. The $19 million increase was used to fund leases and maintain liquidity at the Bank. The following table presents average balances and average rates paid on deposits for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003:

           The Leasing Companies’ capital expenditures for leased property purchases are sometimes financed by assigning certain base lease term payments to banks or other financial institutions, including CalFirst Bank. The assigned lease payments are discounted at fixed rates such that the lease payments are sufficient to fully amortize the aggregate outstanding debt. At September 30, 2004, the Company had outstanding non-recourse debt aggregating $14.2 million relating to discounted lease rentals assigned to lenders. In the past, the Company has been able to obtain adequate non-recourse funding commitments, and the Company believes it will be able to do so in the future.

13

          In April 2001, the Board of Directors authorized management, at its discretion, to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock. During the three months ended September 30, 2004 the Company did not purchase any shares. As of October 29, 2004, 612,956 shares remain available under this authorization.

          The need for cash for operating activities will increase as the Company expands. The Company believes that existing cash balances, cash flow from operations, cash flows from its financing and investing activities, and assignments (on a non-recourse basis) of lease payments will be sufficient to meet its foreseeable financing needs.

          Inflation has not had a significant impact upon the operations of the Company.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

          This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and certain factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Factors that might affect forward-looking statements include, among other things:

• General economic or industry conditions could be less favorable than expected, resulting in a reduced demand for capital assets, deterioration in credit quality, deterioration in the recoverability of our investment in leased property and lease residual values, and a change in the allowance for lease losses;
• Changes in the domestic interest rate environment could reduce net interest income and negatively affect certain lessees, which could increase lease losses;
• Over the past few years, the Company's subsidiaries have retained an increasing number of lease transactions in their own portfolios which has increased the Company's exposure to credit risk;
• A material percentage of the Company's net investment in capital leases is with colleges and universities located throughout the United States, and the Company could be vulnerable to economic and other factors that negatively affect these lessees as a group;
• CalFirst Bank may not attract or retain sufficient deposits at attractive interest rates to fund its lease portfolio, and therefore could require additional investment by the Company and produce lower lease growth;
• Security breaches, systems failures, computer viruses or other similar events could damage CalFirst Bank's reputation, or Internet banks in general, and inhibit the ability to raise deposits;
• The conditions of the securities markets could change, adversely affecting certain lessees and the value or credit quality of the Company's assets, or the availability and terms of non-recourse financing obtained to complete certain lease transactions;
• The Company's Common Stock trades on the NASDAQ National Market System, but the volume of trading has been limited and the low volume of trading limits the liquidity of the Common Stock;
• Changes in the extensive laws, regulations and policies governing financial services companies could alter the Company's business environment or affect operations;
• Catastrophic events could impair the Company's business operations or systems, or that of its lessees, resulting in losses; and
• All the above factors could impact the Company's ability to remain in compliance with commitments made to federal bank regulators in connection with the formation of CalFirst Bank.

          The result of these and other factors could cause a difference from expectations of the risk characteristics of the lease portfolio, the level of defaults and a change in the provision for lease losses. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligations to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date on which they are made.

14

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

          As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's management, including its principal executive officer and its principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2004 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. There were no changes made during the most recent fiscal quarter to the Company's internal controls over financial reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

15

16