CALIFORNIA FIRST LEASING CORP - Quarter Report: 2006 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[Mark
One]
[X] |
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended
September
30, 2006
[ ] |
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the
transition period from
to
Commission
File No.: 0-15641
California
First National Bancorp
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in charter)
California
|
33-0964185
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
18201
Von Karman, Suite 800
|
||
Irvine,
California
|
92612
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code:(949)
255-0500
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes þ No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o No
þ
The
number
of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share, as of November 1, 2006 was 11,178,181.
CALIFORNIA
FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
INDEX
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
PAGE
NUMBER
|
|
3
|
||
4
|
||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 |
5
|
|
6
|
||
7-10
|
||
Item 2. |
11-17
|
|
17-18
|
||
18
|
||
18
|
||
18
|
||
18
|
||
19
|
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
Form
10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include,
among other things, the information concerning our possible future consolidated
results of operations, business and growth strategies, financing plans, our
competitive position and the effects of competition. Forward-looking statements
include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified
by
forward-looking words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “could”, “estimate”,
“expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “may”, “should”, “will”, “would”, “project” and
similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on information
currently available to us and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties,
and certain factors could cause actual results to differ materially from
those
anticipated. Particular uncertainties arise from the behavior of financial
markets, including fluctuations in interest rates, from unanticipated changes
in
the risk characteristics of the lease portfolio, the level of defaults and
a
change in the provision for lease losses and from numerous other matters
of
national, regional and global scale, including those of a political, economic,
business, competitive or regulatory nature. Forward-looking statements speak
only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligations to update
any
forward-looking statements. Management does not undertake to update our
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after
the
date on which they are made
Restatement
As
described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006,
the Company restated certain financial statements and other information,
including such statements and information for each of the quarters of fiscal
2006, to correctly account for certain lease extensions as operating leases
instead of as sales-type leases, and to restate information in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows to comply with the guidance under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows” (“SFAS No.
95”).
2
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except for share amounts)
September
30,
|
June
30,
|
||||||
2006
|
2006
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
29,238
|
$
|
23,217
|
|||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements
to resell
|
26,405
|
17,530
|
|||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
55,643
|
40,747
|
|||||
Investment
securities
|
1,569
|
1,134
|
|||||
Net
receivables
|
1,827
|
1,905
|
|||||
Property
acquired for transactions in process
|
39,045
|
41,680
|
|||||
Net
investment in capital leases
|
215,910
|
213,956
|
|||||
Net
equipment on operating leases
|
284
|
46
|
|||||
Income
tax receivable
|
3,081
|
4,744
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
1,752
|
1,719
|
|||||
Discounted
lease rentals assigned to lenders
|
8,084
|
8,424
|
|||||
$
|
327,195
|
$
|
314,355
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
4,864
|
$
|
3,263
|
|||
Accrued
liabilities
|
4,256
|
4,702
|
|||||
Demand
and money market deposits
|
8,585
|
9,778
|
|||||
Time
certificates of deposit
|
92,372
|
79,388
|
|||||
Lease
deposits
|
6,439
|
5,534
|
|||||
Non-recourse
debt
|
8,084
|
8,424
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes - including income taxes payable, net
|
8,092
|
9,739
|
|||||
132,692
|
120,828
|
||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock; 2,500,000 shares authorized; none issued
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock; $.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized;
11,177,581 (September 2006) and 11,161,508
(June
2006) issued and outstanding
|
112
|
112
|
|||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
3,936
|
3,756
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
190,455
|
189,659
|
|||||
194,503
|
193,527
|
||||||
$
|
327,195
|
$
|
314,355
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part
of
these
consolidated financial statements.
3
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
(in
thousands, except for per share amounts)
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
September
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
(restated)
|
|||||||
Direct
finance income
|
$
|
5,464
|
$
|
4,013
|
|||
Interest
and investment income
|
486
|
307
|
|||||
Total
direct finance and interest income
|
5,950
|
4,320
|
|||||
Interest
expense on deposits
|
1,087
|
458
|
|||||
Provision
for lease losses
|
30
|
402
|
|||||
Net
direct finance and interest income after
provision
for lease losses
|
4,833
|
3,460
|
|||||
Other
income
|
|||||||
Operating
and sales-type lease income
|
931
|
916
|
|||||
Gain
on sale of leases and leased property
|
1,108
|
3,266
|
|||||
Other
fee income
|
156
|
156
|
|||||
Total
other income
|
2,195
|
4,338
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
7,028
|
7,798
|
|||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
3,749
|
3,852
|
|||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
3,279
|
3,946
|
|||||
Income
taxes
|
1,254
|
1,529
|
|||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
2,025
|
$
|
2,417
|
|||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$
|
.18
|
$
|
.22
|
|||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$
|
.18
|
$
|
.21
|
|||
Dividends
declared per common share outstanding
|
$
|
.11
|
$
|
.10
|
|||
Average
common shares outstanding - basic
|
11,169
|
11,106
|
|||||
Average
common shares outstanding - diluted
|
11,543
|
11,381
|
|||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part
of
these consolidated financial
statements.
|
4
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(in
thousands)
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
(restated)
|
||||||
Net
Earnings
|
$
|
2,025
|
$
|
2,417
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
|
175
|
188
|
|||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
33
|
47
|
|||||
Leased
property on operating leases, net
|
(281
|
)
|
(44
|
)
|
|||
Interest
accretion of estimated residual values
|
(333
|
)
|
(377
|
)
|
|||
Gain
on sale of leased property and sales-type lease income
|
(964
|
)
|
(2,776
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for lease losses
|
30
|
402
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes, including income taxes payable
|
(1,648
|
)
|
(4,030
|
)
|
|||
Decrease
(increase) in receivables
|
78
|
(1,121
|
)
|
||||
Decrease
in income taxes receivable
|
1,663
|
-
|
|||||
Net
increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
1,156
|
671
|
|||||
Increase
in customer lease deposits
|
904
|
722
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used for) operating activities
|
2,838
|
(3,901
|
)
|
||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Investment
in leases and transactions in process
|
(37,997
|
)
|
(44,029
|
)
|
|||
Payments
received on lease receivables
|
37,929
|
32,593
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sales of leased property and sales-type leases
|
2,017
|
4,592
|
|||||
Purchase
of investment securities
|
(450
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Pay
down of investment securities
|
15
|
254
|
|||||
Net
increase in other assets
|
(165
|
)
|
(170
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by (used for) investing activities
|
1,349
|
(6,760
|
)
|
||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Net
increase in time certificates of deposit
|
12,985
|
1,931
|
|||||
Net
(decrease) increase in demand and money market deposits
|
(1,193
|
)
|
957
|
||||
Dividends
to stockholders
|
(1,230
|
)
|
(1,111
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
147
|
132
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
10,709
|
1,909
|
|||||
NET
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
14,896
|
(8,752
|
)
|
||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
40,747
|
43,321
|
|||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
$
|
55,643
|
$
|
34,569
|
|||
SUPPLEMENTAL
SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Decrease
in lease rentals assigned to lenders and related non-recourse
debt
|
$
|
(339
|
)
|
$
|
(3,074
|
)
|
|
Estimated
residual values recorded on leases
|
$
|
(531
|
)
|
$
|
(624
|
)
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|||||||
Cash
paid during the three month period for:
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
1,088
|
$
|
462
|
|||
Income
Taxes
|
$
|
1,239
|
$
|
5,559
|
|||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part
of
these consolidated financial
statements.
|
5
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
(in
thousands, except for share amounts)
Additional
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Paid
in
|
Retained
|
||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2005
|
11,098,683
|
$
|
111
|
$
|
3,013
|
$
|
183,614
|
$
|
186,738
|
|||||||
Net
earnings (restated)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,417
|
2,417
|
|||||||||||
Shares
issued -
|
||||||||||||||||
Stock
options exercised
|
14,621
|
-
|
132
|
-
|
132
|
|||||||||||
Stock-based
|
||||||||||||||||
compensation
expense
|
-
|
-
|
47
|
-
|
47
|
|||||||||||
Dividends
declared
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,111
|
)
|
(1,111
|
)
|
|||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2005
|
11,113,304
|
$
|
111
|
$
|
3,192
|
$
|
184,920
|
$
|
188,223
|
|||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2006
|
11,161,508
|
$
|
112
|
$
|
3,756
|
$
|
189,659
|
$
|
193,527
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,025
|
2,025
|
|||||||||||
Shares
issued -
|
||||||||||||||||
Stock
options exercised
|
16,073
|
-
|
147
|
-
|
147
|
|||||||||||
Stock-based
|
||||||||||||||||
compensation
expense
|
-
|
-
|
33
|
-
|
33
|
|||||||||||
Dividends
declared
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,229
|
)
|
(1,229
|
)
|
|||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2006
|
11,177,581
|
$
|
112
|
$
|
3,936
|
$
|
190,455
|
$
|
194,503
|
|||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part
of
these consolidated financial
statements.
|
6
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE
1-
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial
information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information
and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. The financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the California
First
National Bancorp (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2006. The material under the heading “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is written with the
presumption that the readers have read or have access to the 2006 Annual
Report
on Form 10-K, which contains Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations as of June 30, 2006 and for the year
then
ended.
In
the
opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements contain all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for
a
fair statement of the balance sheet as of September 30, 2006 and the statements
of earnings and cash flows for the three-month periods ended September 30,
2006
and 2005. The results of operations for the three-month period ended September
30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be
expected for the entire fiscal year ending June 30, 2007.
Restatement
As
described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006,
the Company restated certain financial statements, including such statements
for
each of the quarters of fiscal 2006, to correctly account for certain lease
extensions as operating leases instead of as sales-type leases, and to restate
information in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to comply with the
guidance under SFAS No. 95.
Accounting
for Lease Extensions
A
review
of the accounting for lease extensions accounted for as sales-type leases
identified that certain lease extensions classified as sales-type leases
should
have been classified as operating leases. The following table summarizes
the
impact of the adjustments relating to the reclassification of certain lease
extensions on affected line items within the Company’s previously reported
Statements of Earnings for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The restatement
had an immaterial effect on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2005 and no effect on the timing or amount of actual cash
flows.
(dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
Three
months ended
September
30, 2005
|
|||
Total
other income
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
(15
|
)
|
||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
Impact
on earnings per share
|
||||
Diluted
earnings per share, as reported
|
$
|
0.21
|
||
Adjustment
|
-
|
|||
Diluted
earnings per share, restated
|
$
|
0.21
|
7
Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows
The
following table summarizes the effects of the restatement of the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended September 30, 2005. The
reclassification has the effect of decreasing the reported cash used in
operating activities and increasing the cash flow used in investing activities
as compared to the Company’s previously issued financial
statements.
(dollars
in thousands)
|
Three
months ended September
30, 2005 |
|||
Net
cash used for operating activities, previously reported
|
$
|
(7,471
|
)
|
|
Restatement
of cash flows related to:
|
||||
Net
income
|
(24
|
)
|
||
Sale
of property and sales-type leases
|
(4,625
|
)
|
||
Transactions
in process
|
8,121
|
|||
Other
|
98
|
|||
Restated
net cash used for operating activities
|
$
|
(3,901
|
)
|
|
Net
cash used for investing activities, previously reported
|
$
|
(3,190
|
)
|
|
Restatement
of cash flows related to:
|
||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and sales-type leases
|
4,625
|
|||
Investment
in leases and transactions in process
|
(8,121
|
)
|
||
Other
|
(74
|
)
|
||
Restated
net cash used for investing activities
|
$
|
(6,760
|
)
|
Certain
reclassifications have been made to the first quarter of fiscal 2006 financial
statements to conform to the presentation of the first quarter of fiscal
2007
financial statements.
NOTE
2
- STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
At
September 30, 2006, the Company has one stock option plan, which is more
fully
described in Note 9 in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. On July 1,
2005, the Company implemented Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
123(R),“Share-Based
Payments” (“SFAS No. 123R”) which replaced SFAS No. 123 and supersedes
Opinion No. 25 and the related implementation guidance. SFAS No. 123R
addresses accounting for equity-based compensation arrangements, including
employee stock options. The Company adopted the “modified prospective method”
where stock-based compensation expense is recorded beginning on the adoption
date and prior periods are not restated. Under this method, compensation
expense
is recognized using the fair-value based method for all new awards granted
after
July 1, 2005. Additionally, compensation expense for unvested stock options
that
are outstanding at July 1, 2005 is recognized over the requisite service
period
based on the fair value of those options as previously calculated at the
grant
date under the pro-forma disclosures of SFAS 123. The fair value of each
grant
is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
During
the
quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company recognized pre-tax stock-based
compensation expense of $33,000 compared to $46,837 recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Such expense
related to options granted during the fiscal years ended August 2002 through
June 2004. The Company has not awarded any new grants since fiscal 2004 and
has
calculated the stock-based compensation expense based upon the original grant
date fair value as allowed under SFAS No. 123R. The valuation variables utilized
at the grant dates are discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K in
the respective years of the original grants. As of September 30, 2006,
approximately $174,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related
to
unvested shares is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of
approximately 14 months.
8
The
following table summarizes the stock option activity for the periods
indicated:
Three
months ended
|
|||||||||||||
September
30, 2006
|
September
30, 2005
|
||||||||||||
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
||||||||||
Options
outstanding at the beginning of period
|
945,767
|
$
|
9.02
|
1,017,518
|
$
|
9.02
|
|||||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Exercised
|
(16,073
|
)
|
9.17
|
(
14,621
|
)
|
9.09
|
|||||||
Canceled/expired
|
-
|
-
|
(
2,000
|
)
|
8.88
|
||||||||
Options
outstanding at end of period
|
929,694
|
$
|
9.03
|
1,000,897
|
$
|
9.03
|
|||||||
Options
exercisable
|
883,748
|
919,975
|
As
of September 30, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Options
outstanding
|
Options
exercisable
|
|||||||||||||||
Range
of
Exercise
prices
|
Number
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(in years)
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Number
Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||
$
5.20 - $ 8.81
|
603,858
|
4.26
|
$
|
7.54
|
580,770
|
$
|
7.49
|
|||||||||
9.85
- 12.49
|
248,018
|
3.67
|
11.05
|
225,160
|
10.96
|
|||||||||||
13.64
- 15.27
|
77,818
|
1.58
|
13.95
|
77,818
|
13.95
|
|||||||||||
$
5.20 - $15.27
|
929,694
|
3.88
|
$
|
9.03
|
883,748
|
$
|
8.95
|
NOTE
3
- SEGMENT REPORTING
The
Company has two leasing subsidiaries, California First Leasing Corporation
(“CalFirst Leasing”) and Amplicon, Inc. (“Amplicon”), collectively the “Leasing
Companies”. The Company has a bank subsidiary, California First National Bank
(“CalFirst Bank” or the “Bank”), which is an FDIC-insured national
bank.
Below
is a
summary of each segment’s financial results for the quarters ended September 30,
2006 and 2005:
Bancorp
and
|
|||||||||||||
Leasing
|
Eliminating
|
||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
Companies
|
CalFirst
Bank
|
Entries
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||
Quarter
ended September 30, 2006
|
|||||||||||||
Net direct finance and interest income, after provision for lease losses
|
$
|
3,724
|
$
|
1,091
|
$
|
18
|
$
|
4,833
|
|||||
Other
income
|
2,076
|
119
|
-
|
2,195
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$
|
5,800
|
$
|
1,210
|
$
|
18
|
$
|
7,028
|
|||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
1,209
|
$
|
281
|
$
|
535
|
$
|
2,025
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
226,418
|
$
|
148,784
|
$
|
(48,007
|
)
|
$
|
327,195
|
||||
Quarter
ended September 30, 2005 (restated)
|
|||||||||||||
Net
direct finance and interest income, after provision for lease losses
|
$
|
2,773
|
$
|
681
|
$
|
6
|
$
|
3,460
|
|||||
Other
income
|
4,105
|
233
|
-
|
4,338
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$
|
6,878
|
$
|
914
|
$
|
6
|
$
|
7,798
|
|||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
1,967
|
$
|
232
|
$
|
218
|
$
|
2,417
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
237,543
|
$
|
102,114
|
$
|
(62,503
|
)
|
$
|
277,154
|
9
NOTE
4
- CAPITAL LEASES
The
Company's net investment in capital leases consists of the
following:
September
30, 2006
|
June
30, 2006
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Minimum
lease payments receivable
|
$
|
237,607
|
$
|
234,337
|
|||
Estimated
residual value
|
12,474
|
12,644
|
|||||
250,081
|
246,981
|
||||||
Less
allowance for lease losses
|
(3,070
|
)
|
(3,339
|
)
|
|||
Less
valuation allowance for estimated residual value
|
(155
|
)
|
(230
|
)
|
|||
246,856
|
243,412
|
||||||
Less
unearned income
|
(30,946
|
)
|
(29,456
|
)
|
|||
Net
investment in capital leases
|
$
|
215,910
|
$
|
213,956
|
The
minimum lease payments receivable and estimated residual value are discounted
using the internal rate of return method related to each specific capital
lease.
Unearned income includes the offset of initial direct costs of $4.3 million
at
September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006.
NOTE
5
- RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS
No. 157). SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to
be
applied to US GAAP guidance requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS
No. 157
on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
10
ITEM 2. |
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
GENERAL
California
First National Bancorp, a California corporation, is a bank holding company
headquartered in Orange County, California. The Leasing Companies and CalFirst
Bank focus on leasing and financing capital assets, primarily computers,
computer networks and other high technology assets, through centralized
marketing programs designed to offer cost-effective leasing alternatives.
Leased
assets are re-marketed at lease expiration. CalFirst Bank also provides business
loans to fund the purchase of assets leased by third parties, including the
Leasing Companies. CalFirst Bank gathers deposits from a centralized location
primarily through posting rates on the Internet.
The
Company’s direct finance income includes interest income earned on the Company’s
investment in lease receivables and residuals. Other income primarily includes
gains realized on the sale of leased property, income from sales-type and
operating leases and gains realized on the sale of leases, and other fee
income.
Income from sales-type leases relates to the re-lease of lease property (“lease
extensions”) while income from operating leases generally involves lease
extensions that are accounted for as operating leases rather than as
sales-type leases.
The
Company's operating results are subject to quarterly fluctuations resulting
from
a variety of factors, including the volume and profitability of leased property
being re-marketed through re-lease or sale, the size and credit quality of
the
lease portfolio, the interest rate environment, the volume of new lease
originations, including variations in the mix and funding of such originations,
and economic conditions in general. The Company’s principal market risk exposure
is interest rate risk, which is the exposure due to differences in the repricing
characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
The
Company’s interest-bearing liabilities represent about 30% of total assets, and
therefore, changes in interest rates in general have a greater impact on
the
yield earned on the investment in lease receivables, securities and other
interest earning assets, with less impact from higher or lower interest expense.
However, a flattening of the yield curve does result in some impact to earnings
due to the compression of earning asset yields and funding rates, while a
steeper curve would result in increased earnings as investment margins
widen.
The
Company conducts its leasing business in a manner designed to mitigate risks.
However, the assumption of risk is a key source of earnings in the leasing
and
banking industries and the Company is subject to risks through its investment
in
lease receivables held in its own portfolio, lease transactions in process,
and
residual investments. The Company takes steps to manage risks through the
implementation of strict credit management processes and on-going risk
management review procedures.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires management to make
certain critical accounting estimates that impact the stated amount of assets
and liabilities at a financial statement date and the reported amount of
income
and expenses during a reporting period. These accounting estimates are based
on
management’s judgment and are considered to be critical because of their
significance to the financial statements and the possibility that future
events
may differ from current judgments, or that the use of different assumptions
could result in materially different estimates. The critical accounting policies
and estimates have not changed from and should be read in conjunction with
the
Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2006.
The
Company's estimates are reviewed continuously to ensure reasonableness. However,
the amounts the Company may ultimately realize could differ from such estimated
amounts.
Overview
of Results and Trends
The
following discussion is provided in addition to the required analysis of
earnings in order to discuss trends in our business. We believe this analysis
provides additional meaningful information on a comparative basis.
Net
earnings for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 were down 16% from the same
period
of the prior year as a 40% increase in net direct finance and interest income
could not offset the 49% decrease in income from the portfolio of assets
reaching the end of term. The net investment in capital leases of $215.9
million
at September 30, 2006 was only up slightly from the balance at June 30, 2006,
but increased by $27.0 million, or 14%, from the balance at September 30,
2005.
The increased investment in capital leases from the year before, along with
higher interest rates, contributed to the growth in direct finance income
in the
quarter.
11
New
lease
bookings for the first three months of fiscal 2007 of $43.0 million were
11%
greater than the same quarter of the prior year. The volume of new lease
commitments approved during the first quarter (“lease originations”) was down
significantly from the first quarter of fiscal 2006. As a result, the backlog
of
approved lease commitments is approximately 13% below the level of the prior
year.
The
Bank
represents a growing portion of the Company’s consolidated results, with the
Bank’s investment in capital leases of $107.7 million at September 30, 2006
representing 50% of the Company’s consolidated investment. To fund this
portfolio, the Bank’s demand, money market and time deposits increased by 77% to
$101.0 million from $57.0 million at September 30, 2005, and 13% from $89.2
million at June 30, 2006.
Consolidated
Statement of Earnings Analysis
Summary
--
For the
first quarter ended September 30, 2006, net earnings of $2.0 million decreased
16% from $2.4 million for the first quarter ended September 30, 2005. Diluted
earnings per share decreased 17% to $.18 for the quarter ended September
30,
2006, compared to $.21 per share for the same quarter of the prior year.
The
larger decrease in diluted earnings per share compared to net earnings reflects
the impact of a larger number of diluted shares outstanding during the
period.
Net
Direct Finance and Interest Income -- Net
direct
finance and interest income is the difference between interest earned on
the
investment in capital leases, securities and other interest earning investments
and interest paid on deposits or other borrowings. Net direct finance and
interest income is affected by changes in the volume and mix of interest
earning
assets, the movement of interest rates, and funding and pricing strategies.
Net
direct
finance and interest income was $4.9 million for the quarter ended September
30,
2006, compared to $3.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005,
an
increase of $1.0 million, or 26%. Direct finance income of $5.5 million
increased by $1.5 million, or 36%, as a result a higher average investment
in
capital leases held in the Company’s own portfolio along with a 161 basis point
increase in the average yield earned. The average yield on the portfolio was
up due
to in part to market
conditions and to a lower percentage of tax-exempt leases in
the
portfolio. The increase of $179,000 in interest and investment income is
due to
a 116 improvement in yields on slightly higher investment balances. Interest
expense on deposits was $1.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2007
compared to $458,000 for the same quarter of the prior year, reflecting a
67%
increase in the average balances of interest bearing deposits and a 137 basis
point increase in the average interest rates paid.
The
following table presents the components of the increases (decreases) in net
direct finance and interest income before provision for lease losses by volume
and rate:
Quarter
ended
|
||||||||||
September
30, 2006 vs 2005
|
||||||||||
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
|||||||
|
(in
thousands)
|
Interest
income
|
||||||||||
Net
investment in capital leases
|
$
|
593
|
$
|
858
|
$
|
1,451
|
||||
Discounted
lease rentals
|
15
|
(20
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
|||||
Federal
funds sold
|
(17
|
)
|
(11
|
)
|
(28
|
)
|
||||
Federal
funds sold
|
81
|
88
|
169
|
|||||||
Investment
securities
|
(2
|
)
|
6
|
4
|
||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits with banks
|
(20
|
)
|
26
|
6
|
||||||
667
|
958
|
1,625
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
||||||||||
Non-recourse
debt
|
15
|
(20
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
|||||
Demand
and savings deposits
|
(49
|
)
|
21
|
(28
|
)
|
|||||
Time
deposits
|
362
|
295
|
657
|
|||||||
328
|
296
|
624
|
||||||||
$
|
339
|
$
|
662
|
$
|
1,001
|
12
The
following table presents the Company’s average balance sheets, direct finance
income and interest earned or interest paid, the related yields and rates
on
major categories of the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities. Yields/rates are presented on an annualized basis.
Quarter
ended
September
30, 2006
|
Quarter
ended
September
30, 2005
|
||||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
Average
|
Yield/
|
Average
|
Yield/
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
deposits with banks
|
$
|
26,838
|
$
|
175
|
2.6
|
%
|
$
|
30,378
|
$
|
169
|
2.2
|
%
|
|||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
21,818
|
293
|
5.4
|
%
|
13,166
|
124
|
3.8
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Investment
securities
|
1,240
|
18
|
5.8
|
%
|
1,419
|
14
|
3.9
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Net
investment in capital leases
|
|||||||||||||||||||
including
discounted lease rentals (1,2)
|
221,304
|
5,587
|
10.1
|
%
|
193,013
|
4,141
|
8.6
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
271,200
|
6,073
|
9.0
|
%
|
237,976
|
4,448
|
7.5
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Other
assets
|
46,128
|
42,204
|
|||||||||||||||||
$
|
317,328
|
$
|
280,180
|
||||||||||||||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Demand
and savings deposits
|
$
|
7,633
|
81
|
4.2
|
%
|
$
|
13,825
|
109
|
3.1
|
%
|
|||||||||
Time
deposits
|
85,417
|
1,006
|
4.7
|
%
|
41,908
|
349
|
3.3
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Non-recourse
debt (1)
|
8,081
|
123
|
6.1
|
%
|
7,222
|
128
|
7.1
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
101,131
|
1,210
|
4.8
|
%
|
62,955
|
586
|
3.7
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
22,033
|
29,735
|
|||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
194,164
|
187,490
|
|||||||||||||||||
$
|
317,328
|
$
|
280,180
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
direct finance and interest income
|
$
|
4,863
|
$
|
3,862
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
direct finance and interest income to average
interest-earning assets |
7.2
|
%
|
6.5
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Average
interest-earning assets over average
interest-bearing liabilities |
268.2
|
%
|
378.0
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
(1)
|
Direct
finance income and interest expense on average discounted lease
rentals
and non-recourse debt of $8.1 million and $7.2 million for the
quarters
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, offset each other
and do
not contribute to the Company’s net direct finance and interest
income.
|
(2)
|
Average
balance is based on month-end balances, and includes non-accrual
leases,
and is presented net of unearned income.
|
Provision
for Lease Losses -- The
Company had a provision for lease losses in the first quarter of fiscal 2007
of
$30,000, compared to a $402,000 provision for the same period in the prior
year.
The decrease in the provision largely relates to the relative stability in
the
credit quality of the portfolio. The first quarter provision of 2006 included
amounts related to lessees located in New Orleans impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Other
Income
-- Total
other income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 decreased by $2.1 million,
or 49.4%, to $2.2 million, compared to $4.3 million for the same quarter
of the
prior fiscal year. The decrease in other income is largely due to a decrease
of
$2.2 million related to lower gains on sale of leases and leased property to
$1.1
million. In the prior year quarter, the early buyout of four leases contributed
to the higher gain on sale of leases and leased property. Operating and
sales-type lease income remained flat due to the approximate same level of
lease
renewals. There was no change in other fee income between periods.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
-- The
Company’s selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) decreased
$103,000, or 2.7%, to $3.7 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2007
compared to $3.9 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The decrease
in SG&A expenses is primarily due to lower compensation costs incurred
related to the sales force during the period. SG&A expenses in the
first quarter of fiscal 2007 include a lower deferral of initial direct costs
of
$890,000, compared to $937,000 in the first quarter fiscal 2006.
13
Income
Taxes
-- Income
taxes were accrued at a tax rate of 38.25% for the fiscal first quarter ended
September 30, 2006 compared to 38.75% for the fiscal first quarter ended
September 30, 2005 representing the estimated annual tax rate for the fiscal
years ending June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Financial
Condition Analysis
Lease
Portfolio Analysis
The
Company’s risk assets are comprised almost exclusively of leases for capital
assets to businesses and other commercial or non-profit organizations. All
leases are secured by the underlying property being leased. The Company’s
strategy is to develop lease portfolios with risk/reward profiles that meet
its
objectives. The Company currently funds a large percentage of new lease
transactions internally, while only a small portion of lease receivables are assigned
to
financial institutions. During the first quarter ended September 30, 2006,
approximately 91% of the total dollar amount of new leases booked by the
Company
were held in its own portfolio, compared to 96% during the first quarter
of
fiscal 2006. During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company’s net
investment in capital leases increased by $2.0 million from June 30, 2006.
This
increase includes a $2.1 million increase in the Company’s investment in lease
receivables, and a $100,000 reduction in the investment in estimated residual
values. The increase in the investment in capital leases is primarily due
to the
higher volume of new lease transactions booked and retained by the Company,
while the decline in investment in residual values is due to a lower volume
of
leases being booked on which the Company records a residual value.
The
Company often makes payments to purchase leased property prior to the
commencement of the lease. The disbursements for these lease transactions
in
process are generally made to facilitate the lessees’ property implementation
schedule. The lessee is contractually obligated by the lease to make rental
payments directly to the Company during the period that the transaction is
in
process, and the lessee is generally obligated to reimburse the Company for
all
disbursements under certain circumstances. Income is not recognized while
a
transaction is in process and prior to the commencement of the lease. At
September 30, 2006, the Company’s investment in property acquired for
transactions in process of $39.0 million related to approximately $106.1
million
of approved lease commitments. This investment in transactions in process
was down from $41.7 million at June 30, 2006, which related to approved lease
commitments of $117.7 million, and from $42.2 million at September 30, 2005
which related to approved lease commitments of $122.3 million.
The
Company monitors the performance of all leases held in its own portfolio,
transactions in process, as well as lease transactions assigned to lenders,
if
the Company retains a residual investment in the leased property subject
to
those leases. An ongoing review of all leases ten or more days delinquent
is
conducted. Lessees who are delinquent with the Company or an assignee are
coded
in the Company’s accounting and tracking systems in order to provide management
visibility, periodic reporting, and appropriate reserves. The accrual of
interest income on leases will generally be discontinued when the lessee
becomes
ninety days or more past due on its lease payments with the Company, unless
the
Company believes the investment is otherwise recoverable. Leases may be placed
on non-accrual earlier if the Company has significant doubt about the ability
of
the lessee to meet its lease obligations, as evidenced by consistent
delinquency, deterioration in the lessee’s financial condition or other relevant
factors.
The
following table summarizes the Company’s non-performing capital
leases:
September
30, 2006
|
June
30, 2006
|
||||||
Non-performing
Capital Leases
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||
Non-accrual
leases
|
$
|
1,199
|
$
|
1,010
|
|||
Restructured
leases
|
989
|
996
|
|||||
Leases
past due 90 days (other than above)
|
1,169
|
-
|
|||||
Total
non-performing capital leases
|
$
|
3,357
|
$
|
2,006
|
|||
Non-performing
assets as % of net investment in
capital leases before allowances
|
1.5
|
%
|
0.9
|
%
|
The
increase in non-performing leases at September 30, 2006 compared to June
30,
2006 is primarily due one customer who filed bankruptcy during the quarter
and
whose lease obligations were greater than 90 days past due at September 30,
2006. In addition to the non-performing capital leases identified above,
there
was $2.0 million of investment in capital leases at September 30, 2006 for
which
management has concerns regarding the ability of the lessees to continue
to meet
existing lease obligations, compared with $1.8 million at June 30, 2006.
This
amount consists of leases classified as substandard or doubtful, or with
lessees
that currently are experiencing financial difficulties or that management
believes may experience financial difficulties in the future. Although these
leases have been identified as potential problem leases, they may never become
non-performing. The increase reflects the addition of one special mention
credit, which offset the benefit from the paydown on other substandard leases.
These potential problem leases are considered in the determination of the
allowance for lease losses.
14
Allowance
for Lease Losses
The
allowance for lease losses provides coverage for probable and estimatable
losses
in the Company’s lease portfolios. The allowance recorded is based on a
quarterly review of all leases outstanding and transactions in process. Lease
receivables or residuals are charged off when they are deemed completely
uncollectible. The determination of the appropriate amount of any provision
is
based on management’s judgment at that time and takes into consideration all
known relevant internal and external factors that may affect the lease
portfolio.
Three
months ended
|
|||||||
September
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||
Property
acquired for transactions in process before allowance
|
$
|
39,113
|
$
|
42,241
|
|||
Net
investment in capital leases before allowance
|
219,135
|
192,735
|
|||||
Net
investment in “risk assets”
|
$
|
258,248
|
$
|
234,976
|
|||
Allowance
for lease losses at beginning of period
|
$
|
3,637
|
$
|
3,495
|
|||
Charge-off
of lease investment
|
(374
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
|||
Recovery
of amounts previously written off
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Provision
for lease losses
|
30
|
402
|
|||||
Allowance
for lease losses at end of period
|
$
|
3,293
|
$
|
3,895
|
|||
Allowance
for lease losses as a percent of net investment
|
|||||||
in
capital leases before allowances
|
1.5
|
%
|
2.0
|
%
|
|||
Allowance
for lease losses as a percent of “risk assets”
|
1.3
|
%
|
1.6
|
%
|
The
allowance for lease losses decreased $344,000 to $3.3 million (1.5% of net
investment in capital leases before allowances) at September 30, 2006 from
$3.6
million (1.7% of net investment in capital leases before allowances) at June
30,
2006. This allowance consisted of $929,000 allocated to specific accounts
that
were impaired and $2.36 million that was available to cover losses inherent
in
the portfolio. This compared to $753,000 allocated to specific accounts at
June
30, 2006 and $2.88 million available for losses inherent in the portfolio
at
that time. The increase in the specific allowance at September 30, 2006
primarily relates to the increase in specifically identified problems during
the
quarter. The Company considers the allowance for lease losses of $3.3 million
at
September 30, 2006 adequate to cover losses specifically identified as well
as
inherent in the lease portfolios. However, no assurance can be given that
the
Company will not, in any particular period, sustain lease losses that are
sizeable in relation to the amount reserved, or that subsequent evaluations
of
the lease portfolio, in light of factors then prevailing, including economic
conditions and the on-going credit review process, will not require significant
increases in the allowance for lease losses. Among other factors, economic
and
political events may have an adverse impact on the adequacy of the allowance
for
lease losses by increasing credit risk and the risk of potential loss even
further. As the Company has retained a significantly greater percentage of
leases in its own portfolio, this creates increased exposure to delinquencies,
repossessions, foreclosures and losses than the Company has historically
experienced.
15
Investment
Securities
The
amortized cost, fair value, and carrying value of investment securities at
September 30, 2006 were as follows:
Gross
|
Gross
|
|||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Carrying
|
||||||||||||
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
Value
|
||||||||||||
Held-to-maturity
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
$
|
514
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
$
|
490
|
$
|
514
|
|||||
Federal
Reserve Bank Stock
|
1,055
|
-
|
-
|
1,055
|
1,055
|
|||||||||||
Total
held-to-maturity
|
$
|
1,569
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
$
|
1,545
|
$
|
1,569
|
The
unrealized loss on the Company’s investment in the mortgaged-backed securities
was caused by changes in interest rates. The contractual cash flows are
guaranteed by an agency of the U. S. government, and accordingly, it is expected
that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized
cost
of the Company’s investment. Because the decline in market value is attributable
to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and the Company has
the
ability and intent to hold those investments to maturity, the Company does
not
consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September
30, 2006.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
Company funds its operating activities through internally generated funds,
Bank
deposits and non-recourse debt. At September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006,
the
Company’s cash and cash equivalents were $55.6 million and $40.7 million,
respectively. Stockholders’ equity at September 30, 2006 was $194.5 million, or
59% of total assets, compared to $193.5 million, or 62% of total assets,
at June
30, 2006. At September 30, 2006, the Company and the Bank exceed their
regulatory capital requirements and are considered “well-capitalized” under
guidelines established by the FRB and OCC.
Deposits
at CalFirst Bank totaled $101.0 million at September 30, 2006, compared to
$57.0
million at September 30, 2005. The $44.0 million increase was used to fund
leases and maintain liquidity at the Bank. The following table presents average
balances and average rates paid on deposits for the quarters ended September
30,
2006 and 2005:
Three months ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||
Average
|
Average
|
Average
|
Average
|
||||||||||
Balance
|
Rate
Paid
|
Balance
|
Rate
Paid
|
||||||||||
Non-interest
bearing demand deposits
|
$
|
1,043
|
N/A
|
$
|
1,300
|
N/A
|
|||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
46
|
0.49
|
%
|
31
|
0.50
|
%
|
|||||||
Money
market deposits
|
7,587
|
4.24
|
%
|
13,794
|
3.13
|
%
|
|||||||
Time
deposits, less than $100,000
|
45,856
|
4.67
|
%
|
25,233
|
3.30
|
%
|
|||||||
Time
deposits, $100,000 or more
|
$
|
39,561
|
4.68
|
%
|
$
|
16,675
|
3.30
|
%
|
The
Leasing Companies’ capital expenditures for leased property purchases are
sometimes financed by assigning certain base lease term payments to banks
or
other financial institutions, including CalFirst Bank. The assigned lease
payments are discounted at fixed rates such that the lease payments are
sufficient to fully amortize the aggregate outstanding debt. At September
30,
2006, the Company had outstanding non-recourse debt aggregating $8.1
million
relating to discounted lease rentals assigned to unaffiliated lenders.
In the
past, the Company has been able to obtain adequate non-recourse funding
commitments, and the Company believes it will be able to do so in the
future.
16
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The
following table summarizes various contractual obligations to make and receive
future payments as of September 30, 2006. Commitments to purchase property
for
leases are binding and generally have fixed expiration dates or other
termination clauses. Since the Company expects some of the commitments to
expire
without being funded, the total amounts do not necessarily represent the
Company’s future liquidity requirements.
Due
by Period
|
|||||||||||||
Total
|
Less
Than
1
Year
|
1-5
Years
|
After
5
Years
|
||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
$
|
92,372
|
$
|
71,202
|
$
|
21,170
|
$
|
-
|
|||||
Deposits
without a stated maturity
|
8,585
|
8,585
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Operating
lease rental expense
|
2,050
|
1,030
|
1,020
|
-
|
|||||||||
Lease
property purchases (1)
|
62,371
|
62,371
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Total
contractual commitments
|
$
|
165,378
|
$
|
143,188
|
$
|
22,190
|
$
|
-
|
|||||
Contractual
Cash Receipts
|
|||||||||||||
Lease
payments receivable (2,3)
|
$
|
237,607
|
$
|
114,567
|
$
|
121,850
|
$
|
1,190
|
|||||
Cash
- current balance
|
55,643
|
55,643
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Total
projected cash availability
|
293,250
|
170,210
|
121,850
|
1,190
|
|||||||||
Net
projected cash inflow
|
$
|
127,872
|
$
|
27,022
|
$
|
84,674
|
$
|
1,190
|
(1)
|
Disbursements
to purchase property on approved leases are estimated to be completed
within one year, but it is likely that some portion could be deferred
to
later periods.
|
(2)
|
Based
upon contractual cash flows; amounts could differ due to prepayments,
lease restructures, charge-offs and other factors.
|
|
(3)
|
Does not include amounts to be received related to Transactions in process already funded and the unfunded lease property purchases included above, which together aggregate $106.1 million at September 30, 2006. The timing and amount of repayment cannot be determined until a lease commences.
|
The
need
for cash for operating activities will increase as the Company expands. The
Company believes that existing cash balances, cash flow from operations,
cash
flows from its financing and investing activities, and assignments (on a
non-recourse basis) of lease payments will be sufficient to meet its foreseeable
financing needs.
Inflation
has not had a significant impact upon the operations of the
Company.
Market
risk is the risk of loss in a financial instrument arising from changes in
market indices such as interest rates and equity prices. The Company’s principal
market risk exposure is interest rate risk, which is the exposure due to
differences in the repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. The Company’s balance sheet structure is primarily
short-term in nature, with a greater portion of assets that reprice or mature
within one year. As a result, the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk
largely results from declines in interest rates and the impact on net direct
finance and interest income.
At
September 30, 2006, the Company had $55.6 million invested in securities
of very
short duration, including $26.4 million in federal funds sold and securities
purchased under agreements to resell. The Company’s gross investment in lease
payments receivable of $237.6 million consists of leases with fixed rates,
however, $114.6 million of such investment is due within one year of September
30, 2006. This compares to the Bank’s interest bearing deposit liabilities of
$101 million, 79% of which mature within one year. The Leasing Companies
have no
interest-bearing debt, and non-recourse debt does not represent an interest
rate
risk to the Company because it is fully amortized through direct payments
from
lessees to the purchaser of the lease receivable. Based on the foregoing,
at
September 30, 2006, the Company had assets of $170.2 million subject to changes
in interest rates over the next twelve months, compared to repricing liabilities
of $79.8 million. Given the current structure of the consolidated balance
sheet,
as interest rates increase, interest income on the Company’s short-term
investment position increases, and future lease rates from direct financing
leases, which often are based on United States Treasury rates, will tend
to be
increase.
17
As
the
banking operations of the Company have grown and the Bank’s deposits represent a
greater portion of the Company’s assets, the Company is subject to increased
interest rate risk. The Bank has an Asset/Liability Management Committee
and
policies established to manage its interest rate risk. The Bank measures
its
asset/liability position through duration measures and sensitivity analysis,
and
calculates the potential effect on earnings using maturity gap analysis.
The
interest rate sensitivity modeling includes the creation of prospective twelve
month "baseline" and "rate shocked" net interest income simulations. After
a
"baseline" net interest income is determined, using assumptions that the
Bank
deems reasonable, market interest rates are raised or lowered by 100 to 300
basis points instantaneously, parallel across the entire yield curve, and
a
"rate shocked" simulation is run. Interest rate sensitivity is then measured
as
the difference between calculated "baseline" and "rate shocked" net interest
income. The results of this analysis on the Bank currently are not material
to
the Company as a whole.
Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures.
As
of the
end of the period covered by this report, the Company's management, including
its principal executive officer and its principal financial officer, evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as
such
term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange
Act
of 1934, as amended. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2006 to ensure
that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files
or
submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities
and
Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. There were no changes made during the
most recent fiscal quarter to the Company's internal controls over financial
reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
There
have
been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our
Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006.
The
following table summarizes share repurchase activity for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006:
Maximum
number
|
||||||||||
Total
number
|
of
shares that may
|
|||||||||
of
shares
|
Average
price
|
yet
be purchased
|
||||||||
Period
|
purchased
|
paid
per share
|
under
the plan (1)
|
|||||||
July
1, 2006 - July 31, 2006
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
612,956
|
||||||
August
1, 2006 - August 31, 2006
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
612,956
|
||||||
September
1, 2006 - September 30, 2006
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
612,956
|
||||||
|
- |
$
|
-
|
1)
|
In
April 2001, the Board of Directors authorized management, at its
discretion, to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common
stock.
|
(a) |
Exhibits
|
Page
|
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Executive
Officer
|
20
|
|
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Financial
Officer
|
21
|
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certifications by Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial
Officer
|
22
|
18
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
California
First National Bancorp
|
||||
Registrant
|
||||
DATE: November 13, 2006
|
BY: /S/ S. LESLIE JEWETT
|
|||
S.
LESLIE JEWETT
|
||||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
||||
(Principal
Financial and
|
||||
Accounting
Officer)
|
19