CALIFORNIA FIRST LEASING CORP - Quarter Report: 2009 December (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[Mark
One]
[X] QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the quarterly period ended
|
December 31,
2009
|
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the transition period from
|
to
|
|
Commission
File No.: 0-15641
California
First National Bancorp
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in charter)
California
|
|
33-0964185
|
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer | ||
incorporation
or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) | ||
18201
Von Karman, Suite 800
|
||||
Irvine, California
|
|
92612
|
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) | ||
Registrant's
telephone number, including area
code: (949)
255-0500
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.Yes þ No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
Reporting Company þ
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o No þ
The number
of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share, as of February 9, 2010 was 10,198,515.
CALIFORNIA
FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
INDEX
PAGE | ||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | NUMBER | |
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets - December 31, 2009
and June 30, 2009
|
3 | |
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings - Three and six months
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
4 | |
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows – Six months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
5 | |
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity – Six months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
6 | |
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7-13
|
|
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
14-21 | |
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
21-22 | |
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
|
23 | |
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1A. Risk Factors
|
23 | |
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
23 | |
Item
6. Exhibits
|
23 | |
Signature
|
24 |
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Form
10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include,
among other things, the information concerning our possible future consolidated
results of operations, business and growth strategies, financing plans, our
competitive position and the effects of competition. Forward-looking
statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be
identified by forward-looking words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “could”,
“estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “may”, “should”, “will”, “would”,
“project” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on
information currently available to us and are subject to inherent risks and
uncertainties, and certain factors could cause actual results to differ
materially from those anticipated. Particular uncertainties arise from the
behavior of financial markets, including fluctuations in interest rates and
securities prices, from unanticipated changes in the risk characteristics of the
lease and loan portfolio, the level of defaults and a change in the provision
for credit losses, and from numerous other matters of national, regional and
global scale, including those of a political, economic, business, competitive or
regulatory nature. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made.
The Company undertakes no obligations to update any forward-looking
statements. Management does not undertake to update our
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the
date on which they are made.
CALIFORNIA
FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(thousands,
except for share amounts)
December
31,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2009
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$ | 74,831 | $ | 43,222 | ||||
Federal
funds sold and securities purchased under
|
||||||||
agreements
to resell
|
- | 11,995 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
74,831 | 55,217 | ||||||
Available-for-sale
investment securities
|
72,511 | 115,530 | ||||||
Held-to-maturity
investment securities
|
4,506 | 4,070 | ||||||
Net
receivables
|
4,157 | 3,508 | ||||||
Property
acquired for transactions in process
|
6,925 | 12,373 | ||||||
Leases
and loans:
|
||||||||
Leases
|
207,199 | 216,918 | ||||||
Commercial
loans
|
67,809 | 72,402 | ||||||
Allowance
for credit losses
|
(4,887 | ) | (4,567 | ) | ||||
Net
investment in leases and loans
|
270,121 | 284,753 | ||||||
Net
property on operating leases
|
1,386 | 1,557 | ||||||
Income
tax receivable
|
133 | 3,968 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
1,379 | 1,007 | ||||||
Discounted
lease rentals assigned to lenders
|
16,323 | 6,989 | ||||||
$ | 452,272 | $ | 488,972 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 590 | $ | 2,569 | ||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
3,044 | 4,918 | ||||||
Demand
and money market deposits
|
68,774 | 70,217 | ||||||
Time
certificates of deposit
|
144,398 | 150,727 | ||||||
Lease
deposits
|
3,288 | 4,060 | ||||||
Short-term
borrowings
|
- | 35,444 | ||||||
Long-term
borrowings
|
10,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Non-recourse
debt
|
16,323 | 6,989 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes – including income taxes payable, net
|
12,743 | 12,672 | ||||||
259,160 | 297,596 | |||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock; 2,500,000 shares authorized; none issued
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock; $.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized;
10,198,274 (December 2009) and 10,145,785
(June
2009) issued and outstanding
|
102 | 101 | ||||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
870 | 395 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
189,946 | 189,528 | ||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax
|
2,194 | 1,352 | ||||||
193,112 | 191,376 | |||||||
$ | 452,272 | $ | 488,972 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
3
CALIFORNIA
FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
(thousands,
except for per share amounts)
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Direct
finance and loan income
|
$ | 5,540 | $ | 6,630 | $ | 11,483 | $ | 12,765 | ||||||||
Interest
and investment income
|
1,095 | 1,029 | 2,674 | 1,578 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
direct finance, loan and interest income
|
6,635 | 7,659 | 14,157 | 14,343 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense on deposits and borrowings
|
1,284 | 1,658 | 2,828 | 3,259 | ||||||||||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
100 | 650 | 350 | 875 | ||||||||||||
Net
direct finance, loan and interest income after
|
||||||||||||||||
provision
for credit losses
|
5,251 | 5,351 | 10,979 | 10,209 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest
income
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating
and sales-type lease income
|
514 | 1,105 | 1,020 | 1,708 | ||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of leases and leased property
|
233 | 942 | 486 | 1,779 | ||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of investment securities
|
1,763 | - | 3,436 | - | ||||||||||||
Other
fee income
|
226 | 266 | 484 | 394 | ||||||||||||
Total
non-interest income
|
2,736 | 2,313 | 5,426 | 3,881 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
7,987 | 7,664 | 16,405 | 14,090 | ||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
3,004 | 3,624 | 5,830 | 7,180 | ||||||||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
4,983 | 4,040 | 10,575 | 6,910 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
1,906 | 1,515 | 4,045 | 2,591 | ||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 3,077 | $ | 2,525 | $ | 6,530 | $ | 4,319 | ||||||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$ | .30 | $ | .25 | $ | .64 | $ | .41 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$ | .30 | $ | .25 | $ | .64 | $ | .41 | ||||||||
Dividends
declared per common share outstanding
|
$ | .48 | $ | .12 | $ | .60 | $ | .24 | ||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
10,185 | 10,159 | 10,179 | 10,509 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
common shares outstanding
|
10,289 | 10,210 | 10,282 | 10,580 | ||||||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
4
CALIFORNIA
FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(in
thousands)
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||
December
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
Earnings
|
$ | 6,530 | $ | 4,319 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to cash flows provided by (used for) operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
302 | 226 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
- | 12 | ||||||
Leased
property on operating leases, net
|
(71 | ) | (580 | ) | ||||
Interest
accretion of estimated residual values
|
(678 | ) | (679 | ) | ||||
Sales of leased property and sales-type lease income
|
393 | (419 | ) | |||||
Gain
on sale of investment securities
|
(3,436 | ) | - | |||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
350 | 875 | ||||||
Amortization
of premiums or discounts on securities and loans, net
|
(535 | ) | (683 | ) | ||||
Deferred
income taxes, including income taxes payable
|
(456 | ) | 801 | |||||
(Increase)
decrease in net receivables
|
(649 | ) | 822 | |||||
Decrease
in income taxes receivable
|
3,835 | 1,506 | ||||||
Net
decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(3,853 | ) | (509 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in lease deposits
|
(772 | ) | (215 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
960 | 5,476 | ||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Investment
in leases, loans and transactions in process
|
(69,735 | ) | (115,501 | ) | ||||
Payments
received on lease receivables and loans
|
88,898 | 95,593 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sales of leased property and sales-type leases
|
1,475 | 3,624 | ||||||
Purchase
of investment securities
|
(21,660 | ) | (57,142 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of or pay down on investment securities
|
68,960 | 13 | ||||||
Net
(increase) decrease in other assets
|
(432 | ) | 364 | |||||
Net
cash provided by (used for) investing activities
|
67,506 | (73,049 | ) | |||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
(decrease) increase in time certificates of deposit
|
(6,329 | ) | 18,138 | |||||
Net
(decrease) increase in demand and money market deposits
|
(1,443 | ) | 7,576 | |||||
Net
(decrease) increase in short-term borrowings
|
(35,444 | ) | 35,444 | |||||
Payments
to repurchase common stock
|
(305 | ) | (17,101 | ) | ||||
Dividends
to stockholders
|
(6,112 | ) | (2,438 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
781 | 151 | ||||||
Net
cash (used for) provided by financing activities
|
(48,852 | ) | 41,770 | |||||
NET
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
19,614 | (25,803 | ) | |||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
55,217 | 71,790 | ||||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
$ | 74,831 | $ | 45,987 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Increase
(decrease) in lease rentals assigned to lenders and related non-recourse
debt
|
$ | 9,334 | $ | (18 | ) | |||
Estimated
residual values recorded on leases
|
$ | (4,059 | ) | $ | (900 | ) | ||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW
INFORMATION
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the six month period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 2,877 | $ | 3,222 | ||||
Income
Taxes
|
$ | 763 | $ | 284 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
5
CALIFORNIA
FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
(in
thousands, except for share amounts)
Additional
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Paid
in
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Income
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Six months ended December 31,
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2008
|
11,440,725 | $ | 114 | $ | 7,003 | $ | 195,611 | $ | (273 | ) | $ | 202,455 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
- | - | - | 4,319 | - | 4,319 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on investment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
securities,
net of tax
|
- | - | - | - | 29 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
4,348 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
issued - Stock options exercised
|
18,470 | 1 | 150 | - | - | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||
Shares
repurchased
|
(1,300,000 | ) | (13 | ) | (6,770 | ) | (10,318 | ) | - | (17,101 | ) | |||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
- | - | 12 | - | - | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
declared
|
- | - | - | (2,438 | ) | - | (2,438 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
10,159,195 | $ | 102 | $ | 395 | $ | 187,174 | $ | (244 | ) | $ | 187,427 | ||||||||||||
Six months ended December 31,
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2009
|
10,145,785 | $ | 101 | $ | 395 | $ | 189,528 | $ | 1,352 | $ | 191,376 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
- | - | - | 6,530 | - | 6,530 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on investment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
securities,
net of tax
|
- | - | - | - | 842 | 842 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
7,372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
issued - Stock options exercised
|
78,143 | 1 | 780 | - | - | 781 | ||||||||||||||||||
Shares
repurchased
|
(25,654 | ) | - | (305 | ) | - | - | (305 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Dividends
declared
|
- | - | - | (6,112 | ) | - | (6,112 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2009
|
10,198,274 | $ | 102 | $ | 870 | $ | 189,946 | $ | 2,194 | $ | 193,112 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part
of these
consolidated financial statements.
6
CALIFORNIA
FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1- BASIS OF
PRESENTATION
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of California First
National Bancorp (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries California First National
Bank (“CalFirst Bank” or the “Bank”)) and California First Leasing Corporation
(“CalFirst Leasing”) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles for interim financial information and pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes
thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2009. The material under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is written with the presumption
that the readers have read or have access to the 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K, which contains Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations as of June 30, 2009 and for the year then
ended.
In the
opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements contain all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair statement of the balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 and the statements
of earnings, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the three and six-month
periods ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The results of operations for the
three and six month period ended December 31, 2009 are not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the entire fiscal
year ending June 30, 2010.
NOTE 2 – RECENT ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting
pronouncement establishing the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (the
“ASC”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the
FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. This pronouncement was effective
for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009, for most entities. On the effective date, all non-SEC
accounting and reporting standards were superseded. The Company adopted this new
accounting pronouncement for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009,
as required, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements of the Company.
In April
2009, the FASB revised ASC Section 825-10-50, Financial Instruments — Disclosures
(“ASC 825-50”), to require disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments in interim financial statements of publicly traded companies as well
as in annual financial statements. ASC 825-50 requires entities to disclose the
methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial
instruments in interim financial statements and any changes in these methods and
assumptions from prior periods. The requirement to provide interim
disclosures became effective for the Company for interim periods beginning after
June 15, 2009. In periods after initial adoption, the Company is required
to provide comparative disclosures only for periods ending after initial
adoption. The disclosure requirements of ASC 825-50 have been applied for
the first two quarters of fiscal 2010.
In January
2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair
Value Measurements.” ASU No. 2010-06 amends ASC 820 and clarifies and provides
additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and non-recurring fair
value measurements. This ASU becomes effective for reporting periods commencing
after December 15, 2009. The Company does not anticipate that this ASU will have
a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon
adoption.
NOTE 3 – STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
At
December 31, 2009, the Company has one stock option plan, which is more fully
described in Note 11 in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. On July
1, 2005, the Company implemented Topic 718 in the Accounting Standards
Codification, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”) under the
“modified prospective method” where stock-based compensation expense is recorded
beginning on the adoption date and prior periods are not
restated. Compensation expense is recognized using the fair-value
based method for all new awards granted after July 1, 2005, while compensation
expense for unvested stock options outstanding at July 1, 2005 is recognized
over the requisite service period based on the fair value of those options as
previously calculated at the grant date under the pro-forma disclosures of ASC
718. The fair value of each grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model.
7
During the
six months ended December 31, 2009, there was no pre-tax stock-based
compensation expense compared to $12,000 recognized during the first six months
of fiscal 2009. As of December 31, 2009, the Company has no more
unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested shares. The Company has
not awarded any new grants since fiscal 2004 and had calculated the stock-based
compensation expense based upon the original grant date fair value as allowed
under ASC 718. The valuation variables utilized at the grant dates are discussed
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K in the respective years of the
original grants.
The
following table summarizes the stock option activity for the periods
indicated:
Six
months ended
December
31, 2009
|
Six
months ended
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|||||||||||||
Options
outstanding at the beginning of period
|
344,038 | $ | 8.49 | 451,374 | $ | 9.18 | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
( 78,143 | ) | 10.00 | ( 18,470 | ) | 8.13 | ||||||||||
Canceled/expired
|
- | - | ( 55,405 | ) | 12.82 | |||||||||||
Options
outstanding at end of period
|
265,895 | $ | 8.05 | 377,499 | $ | 8.69 | ||||||||||
Options
exercisable
|
265,895 | 375,188 |
As
of December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||
Options
exercisable and outstanding
|
||||||||||||||
Range
of
Exercise prices
|
Number
Exercisable and
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (in years)
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|||||||||||
$ 5.20 - $ 8.81 | 190,864 | 1.55 | $ | 6.44 | ||||||||||
9.96 - 12.49 | 75,031 | 2.83 | 12.15 | |||||||||||
$ 5.20 - $12.49 | 265,895 | 1.91 | $ | 8.05 |
NOTE 4 – FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENT
On
July 1, 2008, the Company adopted Topic
820 in the Accounting Standards Codification, “Fair Value Measurements” (“ASC 820”).
In accordance with the ASC 820, the Company has
not applied the provisions of this statement to non-financial assets and
liabilities except those that are disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis
(at least annually). ASC 820, among other things, defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances disclosures about
fair value measurements. The adoption of ASC 820 had no material effect on the
Company’s financial statements.
ASC 820
defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in
the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability. ASC 820
establishes a three-tiered value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs based on the
extent to which inputs used are observable in the market and requires the
Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs. If a value is based on inputs that fall in
different levels of the hierarchy, the instrument will be categorized based upon
the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value calculation. The
three levels of inputs are defined as follows:
·
|
Level
1 - Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded
in active markets;
|
·
|
Level
2 - Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in
active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in
markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which
all significant assumptions are observable in the
market;
|
·
|
Level
3 - Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use inputs not
observable in the market. Level 3 valuation techniques could include the
use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar
techniques, and rely on assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability.
|
ASC 820
applies whenever other accounting pronouncements require presentation of fair
value measurements, but does not change existing guidance as to whether or not
an instrument is carried at fair value. As such, ASC 820 does not apply to the
Company’s investment in leases or investment securities held to
maturity. The Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis include primarily securities available-for-sale and at December
31, 2009, there were no liabilities subject to ASC 820.
8
Securities
available-for-sale include corporate bonds, mutual fund investments, and U.S.
Treasury securities and generally are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1
and Level 2 inputs. The fair value of corporate bonds are obtained from
independent quotation bureaus that use computerized valuation formulas to
calculate current values based on observable transactions, but not a quoted bid,
or are valued using prices obtained from the custodian, who uses third party
data service providers (Level 2 input). Publicly traded mutual funds are valued
by reference to the market closing or last trade price (Level 1 inputs). In the
unlikely event that no trade occurred on the applicable date, an indicative bid
or the last trade most proximate to the applicable date would be used (Level 2
input).
The
following table summarizes the Company’s assets, which are measured at fair
value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009:
Total
|
Quoted
Price in Active Markets for Identical Assets
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
|
|||||||||||||
Description
of Assets / Liabilities
|
Fair
Value
|
(Level
1)
|
(Level
2)
|
(Level
3)
|
||||||||||||
Available-for-sale-securities
|
$ | 72,511 | $ | 13,534 | $ | 58,977 | $ | - |
Certain
financial instruments, such as impaired loans and unfunded loan commitments, are
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not
measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value
adjustments only in certain circumstances, usually if there was evidence of
impairment. The Company had no such assets or liabilities at December 31,
2009.
NOTE 5 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
In
accordance with ASC 825-50, the following table summarizes the estimated fair
value of financial instruments as of December 31, 2009, September 30, 2009
and June 30, 2009, and includes financial instruments that are not accounted for
or carried at fair value. In accordance with disclosure guidance related to fair
values of financial instruments, certain financial instruments, including all
lease related assets and liabilities and all non-financial instruments are
excluded from fair value of financial instrument disclosure requirements.
Accordingly, the total of the fair values presented does not represent the
underlying value of the Company.
These fair
value estimates are based on relevant market information and data, however,
given there is no active market or observable market transactions for certain
financial instruments, the Company has made estimates of fair values which are
subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment
and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions
could significantly affect the estimated values.
For cash
and cash equivalents, demand deposits, short-term borrowings, and certain
commercial loans that re-price frequently the fair value is estimated to equal
the carrying cost. Values for available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities
are determined as set forth in Note 4. The fair value of loan participations
purchased in the secondary market is based upon current bid prices in such
market at the measurement date. For other loans, the estimated fair value is
calculated based on discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates
currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar
credit quality. These calculations have been adjusted for credit risk based on
the Company’s historical credit loss experience. The fair value of certificates
of deposit and long-term borrowings is estimated based on discounted cash flows
using current offered market rates or interest rates for borrowings of similar
maturity.
December
31, 2009
|
September
30, 2009
|
June
30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying
|
Estimated
|
Carrying
|
Estimated
|
Carrying
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 74,831 | $ | 74,831 | $ | 62,042 | $ | 62,042 | $ | 55,217 | $ | 55,217 | ||||||||||||
Held-to-maturity
investment securities
|
4,506 | 4,574 | 3,916 | 3,985 | 4,070 | 4,126 | ||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale
investment securities
|
72,511 | 72,511 | 121,956 | 121,956 | 115,530 | 115,530 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
loans
|
66,287 | 66,940 | 73,711 | 74,472 | 71,130 | 70,309 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand
and savings deposits
|
68,774 | 68,774 | 73,602 | 73,602 | 70,217 | 70,217 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time
certificate of deposits
|
144,398 | 145,229 | 154,163 | 155,225 | 150,727 | 151,743 | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term
borrowings
|
- | - | 35,444 | 35,444 | 35,444 | 35,444 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term
borrowings
|
$ | 10,000 | $ | 9,996 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10,032 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 9,980 |
9
NOTE 6 – INVESTMENT
SECURITIES
The
Company’s investment securities are classified as held-to-maturity and
available-for-sale. The amortized cost, fair value, and carrying
value of investment securities were as follows:
At
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Gross
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Carrying
|
|||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
Cost
|
Gains
/ (Losses)
|
Value
|
Value
|
||||||||||||
Available-for-sale
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury securities
|
$ | 10,156 | $ | 461 | $ | 10,617 | $ | 10,617 | ||||||||
Corporate
bonds
|
56,173 | 2,804 | 58,977 | 58,977 | ||||||||||||
Mutual
fund investments
|
2,702 | 215 | 2,917 | 2,917 | ||||||||||||
Total
available-for-sale
|
69,031 | 3,480 | 72,511 | 72,511 | ||||||||||||
Held-to-maturity
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
agency mortgage-backed securities
|
1,185 | 68 | 1,253 | 1,185 | ||||||||||||
Federal
Reserve Bank Stock
|
1,655 | - | 1,655 | 1,655 | ||||||||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank Stock
|
1,666 | - | 1,666 | 1,666 | ||||||||||||
Total
held-to-maturity
|
4,506 | 68 | 4,574 | 4,506 | ||||||||||||
Total
investment securities
|
$ | 73,537 | $ | 3,548 | $ | 77,085 | $ | 77,017 |
At
June 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Gross
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Carrying
|
|||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
Cost
|
Gains
/ (Losses)
|
Value
|
Value
|
||||||||||||
Available-for-sale
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations
|
$ | 45,673 | $ | 895 | $ | 46,568 | $ | 46,568 | ||||||||
U.S.
Treasury securities
|
10,167 | 19 | 10,186 | 10,186 | ||||||||||||
Corporate
bonds
|
39,695 | 597 | 40,292 | 40,292 | ||||||||||||
Trust
preferred securities
|
14,605 | 915 | 15,520 | 15,520 | ||||||||||||
Mutual
fund investment
|
2,702 | (238 | ) | 2,464 | 2,464 | |||||||||||
Equity
investment
|
578 | (78 | ) | 500 | 500 | |||||||||||
Total
available-for-sale
|
113,420 | 2,110 | 115,530 | 115,530 | ||||||||||||
Held-to-maturity
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
agency mortgage-backed securities
|
1,349 | 56 | 1,405 | 1,349 | ||||||||||||
Federal
Reserve Bank Stock
|
1,055 | - | 1,055 | 1,055 | ||||||||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank Stock
|
1,666 | - | 1,666 | 1,666 | ||||||||||||
Total
held-to-maturity
|
4,070 | 56 | 4,126 | 4,070 | ||||||||||||
Total
investment securities
|
$ | 117,490 | $ | 2,166 | $ | 119,656 | $ | 119,600 |
Securities
classified as “available-for-sale” are carried at market value. Net aggregate
unrealized gains or losses on these securities are included in a valuation
allowance account and are shown, net of taxes, as a component of shareholders’
equity.
Securities
classified as “held-to-maturity” are two U.S. agency issued securities and the
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock. The Company
has determined that it has the ability to hold these investments until maturity
and, given the Company’s intent to do so, anticipates that it will realize the
full carrying value of its investment and carries the securities at amortized
cost.
At
December 31, 2009, approximately $10.0 million of U.S. Treasury Securities were
pledged as collateral to secure certain borrowings.
The
investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”) stock is a
required investment related to borrowings from the FHLB. The FHLB obtains its
funding primarily through issuance of consolidated obligations of the Federal
Home Loan Bank system. The U.S. Government does not guarantee these obligations,
and each of the 12 FHLB’s are generally jointly and severally liable for
repayment of each other’s debt. Therefore, the Company’s
10
investment
could be adversely impacted by the financial operations of the FHLB and actions
by the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
Gross
realized gains and gross realized losses on investment securities are summarized
below. During the six months ended December 31, 2009, the Company realized a
gain of $3.5 million on the sale of its investment in trust-preferred securities
and U.S. Agency collateralized mortgage obligations. Proceeds from the sales
were $65.6 million. The Company realized a loss of $27,000 on the sale of
an equity investment and a corporate bond for proceeds of $2.6
million. No securities were sold during the six months ended December
31, 2008. These gains
and losses are recognized using the specific identification method and are
included in non-interest income.
Available-for-sale
|
||||||||
For
the three months ended
|
||||||||
December
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Gross
realized gains
|
$ | 3,463 | $ | - | ||||
Gross
realized losses
|
(27 | ) | - | |||||
Other
than temporary impairment
|
- | - | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 3,436 | $ | - |
The
following tables present the fair value and associated gross unrealized losses
only on available-for-sale securities with gross unrealized losses at June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2009.
Less
than 12 Months
|
12
Months or More
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Loss
|
Fair
Value
|
Loss
|
Fair
Value
|
Loss
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
At June 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity
investment
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | (78 | ) | $ | 500 | $ | (78 | ) | $ | 500 | ||||||||||
Mutual
fund investment
|
- | - | (238 | ) | 2,464 | (238 | ) | 2,464 | ||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | (316 | ) | $ | 2,964 | $ | (316 | ) | $ | 2,964 | ||||||||||
At December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
-
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
The
Company conducts a regular assessment of its investment portfolios to determine
whether any securities are other-than-temporarily impaired. In estimating
other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers, among other
factors, length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than
cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and the
intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a
period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery. At of December
31, 2009, no securities were other than temporarily impaired.
NOTE 7 – NET INVESTMENT IN
LEASES
The
Company's net investment in leases consists of the following:
December
31, 2009
|
June
30, 2009
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Minimum
lease payments receivable
|
$ | 214,402 | $ | 229,041 | ||||
Estimated
residual value
|
15,922 | 12,256 | ||||||
Less
unearned income
|
(23,125 | ) | (24,379 | ) | ||||
Net
investment in leases before allowances
|
207,199 | 216,918 | ||||||
Less
allowance for lease losses
|
(3,252 | ) | (3,182 | ) | ||||
Less
valuation allowance for estimated residual value
|
(113 | ) | (113 | ) | ||||
Net
investment in leases
|
$ | 203,834 | $ | 213,623 |
11
The
minimum lease payments receivable and estimated residual value are discounted
using the internal rate of return method related to each specific capital
lease. Unearned income includes the offset of initial direct costs of
$4.4 million and $4.8 million at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009,
respectively.
NOTE 8 – COMMERCIAL
LOANS
The
Company’s investment in commercial loans consists of the
following:
December
31, 2009
|
June
30, 2009
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Commercial
loan participations
|
$ | 57,839 | $ | 63,064 | ||||
Commercial
real estate loans
|
11,850 | 11,974 | ||||||
Revolving
line of credit
|
300 | - | ||||||
Total
commercial loans
|
69,989 | 75,038 | ||||||
Less
unearned income and discounts
|
(2,180 | ) | (2,636 | ) | ||||
Less
allowance for loan losses
|
(1,522 | ) | (1,272 | ) | ||||
Net
commercial loans
|
$ | 66,287 | $ | 71,130 |
Commercial
loans are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances reduced by the
allowance for loan losses and net of any deferred fees or costs on originated
loans, or unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Interest income
is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees and certain
direct origination costs are capitalized and recognized as an adjustment to the
yield of the related commercial loan.
NOTE 9 –
BORROWINGS
CalFirst
Bank is a member of the FHLB and, as such can take advantage of FHLB programs
for overnight and term advances at published daily rates. Under terms
of a blanket collateral agreement, advances from the FHLB are collateralized by
qualifying investment securities. The Bank also has authority to borrow from the
Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) discount window amounts secured by certain lease
receivables.
Short-term
and long-term borrowings and weighted average interest rates at December 31,
2009 and June 30, 2009 were as follows:
As
of December 31, 2009
|
As
of June 30, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
Amount
|
Average Rate
|
Amount
|
Average Rate
|
||||||||||||
Short-term Borrowings
|
||||||||||||||||
FHLB
advances
|
$ | - | - | $ | 25,444 | 0.33 | % | |||||||||
FRB
advances
|
- | - | 10,000 | 0.50 | % | |||||||||||
- | 35,444 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term Borrowings
|
||||||||||||||||
FHLB
advances
|
10,000 | 2.07 | % | 10,000 | 2.07 | % | ||||||||||
$ | 10,000 | $ | 45,444 |
At
December 31, 2009, CalFirst Bank had unused borrowing availability of
approximately $55 million with the FRB and $2 million with the FHLB. Borrowing
capacity from the FHLB or FRB may fluctuate based upon the acceptability and
risk rating of securities, loan and lease collateral and both the FRB and FHLB
could adjust advance rates applied to such collateral at their
discretion.
12
NOTE 10 – SEGMENT
REPORTING
The
Company’s two subsidiaries, CalFirst Leasing and CalFirst Bank, an FDIC-insured
national bank, are considered to be two different business segments. Below is a
summary of each segment’s financial results for the quarters and six months
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
Bancorp
and
|
||||||||||||||
CalFirst
|
CalFirst
|
Eliminating
|
||||||||||||||
Leasing
|
Bank
|
Entries
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Quarter ended December 31,
2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
direct finance, loan and interest income
|
||||||||||||||||
after
provision for credit losses
|
$ | 2,532 | $ | 2,470 | $ | 249 | $ | 5,251 | ||||||||
Non-interest
income
|
831 | 1,907 | (2 | ) | 2,736 | |||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ | 3,363 | $ | 4,377 | $ | 247 | $ | 7,987 | ||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 796 | $ | 2,225 | $ | 56 | $ | 3,077 | ||||||||
Quarter ended December 31,
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
direct finance, loan and interest income
|
||||||||||||||||
after
provision for credit losses
|
$ | 3,115 | $ | 2,159 | $ | 77 | $ | 5,351 | ||||||||
Non-interest
income
|
1,992 | 321 | - | 2,313 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ | 5,107 | $ | 2,480 | $ | 77 | $ | 7,664 | ||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 1,299 | $ | 1,012 | $ | 214 | $ | 2,525 | ||||||||
Six months ended December 31,
2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
direct finance, loan and interest income
|
||||||||||||||||
after
provision for credit losses
|
$ | 5,143 | $ | 5,359 | $ | 477 | $ | 10,979 | ||||||||
Non-interest
income
|
1,673 | 3,755 | (2 | ) | 5,426 | |||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ | 6,816 | $ | 9,114 | $ | 475 | $ | 16,405 | ||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 1,724 | $ | 4,686 | $ | 120 | $ | 6,530 | ||||||||
Six months ended December 31,
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
direct finance, loan and interest income
|
||||||||||||||||
after
provision for credit losses
|
$ | 6,303 | $ | 3,735 | $ | 171 | $ | 10,209 | ||||||||
Non-interest
income
|
3,412 | 469 | - | 3,881 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ | 9,715 | $ | 4,204 | $ | 171 | $ | 14,090 | ||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 2,338 | $ | 1,529 | $ | 452 | $ | 4,319 | ||||||||
Total
assets at December 31, 2009
|
$ | 137,187 | $ | 299,620 | $ | 15,465 | $ | 452,272 | ||||||||
Total
assets at December 31, 2008
|
$ | 160,323 | $ | 283,344 | $ | (10,411 | ) | $ | 433,256 |
NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
The
Company has evaluated the impact of events that have occurred subsequent to
December 31, 2009 through the filing of this report with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission and based on this evaluation, the Company
determined none of these events require adjustment to the consolidated financial
statements.
13
CALIFORNIA
FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
GENERAL
California First National Bancorp, a
California corporation, is a bank holding company headquartered in Orange
County, California. CalFirst Leasing and CalFirst Bank focus on leasing and
financing capital assets through centralized marketing programs designed to
offer cost-effective leasing alternatives. Leased assets are re-marketed at
lease expiration. CalFirst Bank also provides business loans to fund the
purchase of assets leased by third parties, including CalFirst Leasing,
purchases participations in commercial loan syndications and provides commercial
loans to businesses, including real estate based and unsecured revolving lines
of credit. CalFirst Bank gathers deposits from a centralized location
primarily through posting rates on the Internet.
The Company’s direct finance, loan and
interest income includes interest income earned on the Company’s investment in
lease receivables, residuals, commercial loans and investment securities.
Non-interest income primarily includes gains realized on the sale of leased
property and leases, income from sales-type and operating leases, gains and
losses realized on investments, and other fee income. Income from sales-type
leases relates to the re-lease of lease property (“lease extensions”) while
income from operating leases generally involves lease extensions that are
accounted for as an operating lease rather than as a sales-type
lease.
The Company's operating results are
subject to quarterly fluctuations resulting from a variety of factors, including
the size and credit quality of the lease and loan portfolios, the volume and
profitability of leased property being re-marketed through re-lease or sale, the
interest rate environment, the volume of new lease or loan originations,
including variations in the mix and funding of such originations, the market for
investment securities and economic conditions in general. The Company’s
principal market risk exposure is interest rate risk, which is the exposure due
to differences in the repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. The Company’s balance sheet structure historically
has been short-term in nature, with a greater portion of assets that reprice or
mature within one year. With the increased investment in commercial
loans and investment securities with longer maturities, this maturity gap has
diminished. The Company’s interest margin also is susceptible to timing lags
related to varying movements in market interest rates. Many of
the Company’s leases, loans and liquid investments are tied to U.S. treasury
rates and the fed funds rate that often do not move in step with bank deposit
rates. As a result, this can result in a greater change in net interest income
than indicated by the repricing asset and liability comparison.
The Company conducts its business in a
manner designed to mitigate risks. However, the assumption of risk is a key
source of earnings in the leasing and banking industries and the Company is
subject to risks through its investment securities, leases and loans held in its
own portfolio, lease transactions in process, and residual investments. The
Company takes steps to manage risks through the implementation of strict credit
management processes and on-going risk management review
procedures.
Critical Accounting Policies
and Estimates
The preparation of the Company’s
financial statements requires management to make certain critical accounting
estimates that impact the stated amount of assets and liabilities at a financial
statement date and the reported amount of income and expenses during a reporting
period. These accounting estimates are based on management’s judgment
and are considered to be critical because of their significance to the financial
statements and the possibility that future events may differ from current
judgments, or that the use of different assumptions could result in materially
different estimates. The critical accounting policies and estimates
have not changed from and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s
Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009.
The Company's estimates are reviewed
continuously to ensure reasonableness. However, the amounts the
Company may ultimately realize could differ from such estimated
amounts.
Overview of Results and
Trends
The following discussion is provided in
addition to the required analysis of earnings in order to discuss trends in our
business. We believe this analysis provides additional meaningful information on
a comparative basis.
14
Net earnings for the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 were up 22%, while results for the six months ended December 31,
2009 were up 51%. The increase in net earnings for both periods is
primarily due to gains realized on the sale of investment securities: $1.8
million in the second quarter and $3.4 million during the six-month period. A
17% and 19% reduction in selling, general and administrative expenses for the
respective periods also contributed to the improvement in earnings and helped
offset a reduction in direct finance income.
New lease bookings during the second
quarter of fiscal 2010 were 32% ahead of the prior year level, but due to lower
volume during the first quarter, total six month bookings of $73.8 million were
11% lower than the prior year. As a result, the net investment in
leases of $203.8 million at December 31, 2009 was down 5% from the balance at
June 30, 2009. New commercial loans boarded during the first six months of
fiscal 2010 were only $3.9 million, and following the early payoff of certain
loans, the loan portfolio declined to $66.3 million at December 31, 2009 from
$71.1 million at June 30, 2009. New lease originations for the first
six months of fiscal 2010 were up 19% from the prior year, and while new loan
activity is minimal, the backlog of approved lease and loan commitments of $64.6
million is 11% greater than a year ago.
The
Company’s portfolio of investment securities of $77.0 million at December 31,
2009 was down from $119.6 million at June 30, 2009, but up from $64.1 million at
December 31, 2008. The decrease during the six months of fiscal 2010 resulted
from the sale of approximately $68.3 million of investment securities for the
net gain of $3.4 million noted above. Offsetting the sale of these
investment securities was the acquisition of corporate bonds and unrealized
gains within the investment portfolio.
Consolidated Statement of
Earnings Analysis
Summary -- For the second
quarter ended December 31, 2009, net earnings of $3.1 million increased
$552,000, or 21.9%, from $2.5 million for the second quarter ended December 31,
2008. For the first six months of fiscal 2010, net earnings of $6.5
million increased $2.2 million, or 51.2%, compared to the first six months of
fiscal 2009. Diluted earnings per share increased 20.9% to $0.30 per
share for the second quarter of fiscal 2010, compared to $0.25 per share for the
second quarter of the prior year. For the six months ended
December 31, 2009, diluted earnings per share of $0.64 increased 55.6%, compared
to $0.41 per shared for the same prior year period.
Net Direct Finance, Loan and Interest
Income -- Net direct finance, loan and interest income is the difference
between interest earned on the investment in leases, loans, securities and other
interest earning investments and interest paid on deposits and other borrowings.
Net direct finance, loan and interest income is affected by changes in the
volume and mix of interest earning assets, the movement of interest rates, and
funding and pricing strategies.
Net direct finance, loan and interest
income was $5.4 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, a $650,000, or
10.8%, decrease compared to the same quarter of the prior year. Total
direct finance, loan and interest income for the second quarter ended December
31, 2009 decreased 13.4% to $6.6 million from $7.7 million earned during the
second quarter of fiscal 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a $885,000 or
16% decrease in direct finance income that resulted from an 8% decline in the
average net investment in leases, and a $205,000, or 18%, decrease in loan
income resulting from a 307 basis point drop in yields earned on an average
commercial loan portfolio that was up 29% to $71.5 million. Interest income from
investments was relatively unchanged as a 222 basis point drop in the average
yield to 2.73% was offset by a 93% increase in average investment balances to
$160.7 million. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, interest expense paid
on deposits and borrowings decreased by $375,000 or 29% reflecting a 31%
increase in average balances to $240.3 million that was offset by a 148 basis
point drop in average interest rates paid to 2.14%.
For the six months ended December 31,
2009, net direct finance and interest income was $11.3 million, a $245,000 or
2.2% increase from the $11.1 million earned during the same period of the prior
year. Total direct finance, loan and interest income for the first
six months of fiscal 2010 decreased 1.3% to $14.2 million, but included a $1.1
million increase in investment income offset by a $1.4 million decline in direct
finance income. The increased investment income reflected a $90 million increase
in the average investment in cash and securities to $171.7 million, which was
offset somewhat by a 76 basis point drop in the average yields earned to
3.11%. The decline in direct finance income was due to a 6% decline
in average balances to $202.1 million and a 66 basis point drop in average rates
earned to 9.41%. Commercial loan income for the first six months of fiscal 2010
was up $76,000, or 4%, as a 42% increase in average balances to $72.2 million
offset a 203 basis point drop in the average yield to 5.45%. For the
six months ended December 31, 2009, interest expense on deposits and borrowings
decreased by $431,000 or 15% to $2.8 million, reflecting a 156 basis point
decrease in interest rates paid on average balances that increased by 48% from
the year before to $255.4 million.
15
The following table presents the
components of the increases (decreases) in net direct finance and interest
income before provision for credit losses by volume and rate:
Quarter
ended
|
Six
Months ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
December
31, 2009 vs 2008
|
December
31, 2009 vs 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
investment in leases
|
$ | (410 | ) | $ | (475 | ) | $ | (885 | ) | $ | 319 | $ | (1,678 | ) | $ | (1,359 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
loans
|
343 | (548 | ) | (205 | ) | 809 | (733 | ) | 76 | |||||||||||||||
Discounted
lease rentals
|
(10 | ) | (10 | ) | (20 | ) | (49 | ) | (18 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
(14 | ) | - | (14 | ) | (156 | ) | (16 | ) | (172 | ) | |||||||||||||
Investment
securities
|
962 | (751 | ) | 211 | 2,906 | (1,338 | ) | 1,568 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
deposits with banks
|
177 | (308 | ) | (131 | ) | 305 | (604 | ) | (299 | ) | ||||||||||||||
1,048 | (2,092 | ) | (1,044 | ) | 4,134 | (4,387 | ) | (253 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse
debt
|
(10 | ) | (10 | ) | (20 | ) | (49 | ) | (18 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||||||||||
Demand
and money market deposits
|
190 | (338 | ) | (148 | ) | 406 | (649 | ) | (243 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
286 | (546 | ) | (260 | ) | 722 | (1,029 | ) | (307 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Borrowings
|
8 | 26 | 34 | 65 | 54 | 119 | ||||||||||||||||||
474 | (868 | ) | (394 | ) | 1,144 | (1,642 | ) | (498 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net
direct finance, loan and interest income
|
$ | 574 | $ | (1,224 | ) | $ | (650 | ) | $ | 2,990 | $ | (2,745 | ) | $ | 245 |
The following tables present the
Company’s average balance sheets, direct finance and loan income and interest
earned or interest paid, the related yields and rates on major categories of the
Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Yields/rates
are presented on an annualized basis.
Quarter
ended
|
Quarter
ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
December
31, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Yield/
|
Average
|
Yield/
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
deposits with banks
|
$ | 71,115 | $ | 32 | 0.2 | % | $ | 34,126 | $ | 163 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
- | - | 0.0 | % | 6,959 | 14 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities
|
89,572 | 1,063 | 4.7 | % | 42,098 | 852 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial
loans
|
71,474 | 958 | 5.4 | % | 55,216 | 1,163 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net
investment in leases, including
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
discounted
lease rentals (1,2)
|
209,443 | 4,694 | 9.0 | % | 226,409 | 5,599 | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
441,604 | 6,747 | 6.1 | % | 364,808 | 7,791 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other
assets
|
26,911 | 34,730 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 468,515 | $ | 399,538 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders'
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand
and savings deposits
|
$ | 71,227 | 217 | 1.2 | % | $ | 46,843 | 365 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
150,255 | 1,010 | 2.7 | % | 122,653 | 1,270 | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB
& FRB borrowings
|
18,861 | 57 | 1.2 | % | 13,722 | 23 | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse
debt
|
8,941 | 112 | 5.0 | % | 9,654 | 132 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
249,284 | 1,396 | 2.2 | % | 192,872 | 1,790 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
23,622 | 20,327 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders'
equity
|
195,609 | 186,339 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 468,515 | $ | 399,538 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net
direct finance, loan and interest income
|
$ | 5,351 | $ | 6,001 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
direct finance, loan and interest income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
to
average interest-earning assets
|
4.8 | % | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average
interest-earning assets over
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
average
interest-bearing liabilities
|
177.1 | % | 189.1 | % |
16
Six
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
December
31, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Yield/
|
Average
|
Yield/
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
deposits with banks
|
$ | 64,027 | $ | 63 | 0.2 | % | $ | 34,741 | $ | 362 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
1,714 | - | 0.0 | % | 18,652 | 173 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Investment
securities
|
105,991 | 2,611 | 4.9 | % | 28,006 | 1,043 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial
loans
|
72,217 | 1,968 | 5.5 | % | 50,585 | 1,892 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net
investment in leases, including
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
discounted
lease rentals (1,2)
|
210,166 | 9,717 | 9.2 | % | 225,757 | 11,142 | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
454,115 | 14,359 | 6.3 | % | 357,741 | 14,612 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other
assets
|
27,566 | 36,428 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 481,681 | $ | 394,169 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders'
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand
and savings deposits
|
$ | 71,546 | 471 | 1.3 | % | $ | 45,616 | 714 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
153,597 | 2,215 | 2.9 | % | 119,397 | 2,522 | 4.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB
& FRB borrowings
|
30,254 | 142 | 0.9 | % | 7,841 | 23 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse
debt
|
8,039 | 202 | 5.0 | % | 9,820 | 269 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
263,436 | 3,030 | 2.3 | % | 182,674 | 3,528 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
23,674 | 20,428 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders'
equity
|
194,571 | 191,067 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 481,681 | $ | 394,169 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net
direct finance, loan and interest income
|
$ | 11,329 | $ | 11,084 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
direct finance, loan and interest income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
to
average interest-earning assets
|
5.0 | % | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average
interest-earning assets over
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
average
interest-bearing liabilities
|
172.4 | % | 195.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1)
|
Direct
finance income and interest expense on discounted lease rentals and
non-recourse debt of $16.3 million and $9.3 million at December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively, offset each other and do not contribute to the
Company’s net direct finance and interest
income.
|
(2)
|
Average balance is based on
month-end balances, and includes non-accrual leases, and is presented net
of unearned income.
|
Provision for Credit
Losses -- The Company recorded a provision for credit losses
of $100,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, compared to a provision of
$650,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. For the six-month
period ended December 31, 2009, the provision was $350,000 compared to a
provision of $875,000 for the same period of the prior fiscal
year. The provision for credit losses for both periods in fiscal 2010
related to the heightened credit risk within the commercial loan portfolio, but
also reflected the decline in the lease and commercial loan portfolios over the
first six months of fiscal 2010.
Non-interest
Income -- Total non-interest income for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 increased by $423,000, or 18.3%, to $2.7 million, compared to
$2.3 million for the same quarter of the prior fiscal year. The
increase in non-interest income was entirely due to $1.8 million in gains
realized on the sale of certain investment securities that offset a $1.3 million
decrease in income realized on leases reaching the end of term and from the sale
of leases.
For the six months ended December 31,
2009, total non-interest income of $5.4 million increased 39.8% compared to $3.9
million for the six months ended December 31, 2008. The increase was
due to a $3.4 million of gains realized on the sale of investment securities
that offset a $2.0 million decrease in income realized on leases reaching the
end of term and from the sale of leases.
Selling, General, and Administrative
(“S,G&A”) Expenses – During the second quarter and first six months
of fiscal 2010, S,G&A expenses of $3.0 million and $5.8 million declined by
17.1% and 18.8%, respectively. During both periods, the decrease is
due to lower personnel costs and reduced fixed and variable office costs
resulting from efforts to lower overhead.
17
Taxes – Income taxes were
accrued at a tax rate of 38.25% for the first quarter and six months ended
December 31, 2009, compared to 37.5% for the first quarter and six months ended
December 31, 2008, and represent the estimated annual tax rate for the fiscal
years ending June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Financial Condition
Analysis
Consolidated total assets at December
31, 2009 of $452.3 million were down 7.5% from $489.0 million at June 30, 2009.
The change in total assets includes a $42.6 million decrease in investment
securities to $77.0 million, a $9.8 million decrease in the net investment in
leases to $203.8 million, a $4.9 million decrease in commercial loans to $66.3
million and a $5.4 million decrease in property acquired for transactions in
process to $6.9 million. Offsetting these decreases was a $19.6
million increase in cash and cash equivalents to $74.8 million.
Lease and Loan Portfolio
Analysis
The Company’s strategy is to develop
lease and loan portfolios with risk/reward profiles that meet its objectives.
The Company currently funds most new lease transactions internally, with a
portion of lease receivables assigned to other financial institutions. During
the first six months ended December 31, 2009, approximately 78% of the total
dollar amount of new leases booked by the Company were held in its own
portfolios, compared to 86% during the first six months of fiscal
2009. The $9.8 million decline in the Company’s net investment in
leases includes a $12.7 million decrease in the investment in lease receivables
offset by an increase of $2.9 million increase in the estimated residual
values. The decrease in lease receivables is due to a lower volume of
new leases booked and retained in the Company’s portfolio during the
period. The increased investment in residual values is due to a
larger volume of leases booked during the period in which the Company retained a
residual investment. The Company’s commercial loan portfolio
decreased $4.9 million to $66.3 million due to the early payoff of certain
loans.
The Company often makes payments to
purchase leased property prior to the commencement of the lease. The
disbursements for these lease transactions in process are generally made to
facilitate the lessees’ property implementation schedule. The lessee is
contractually obligated by the lease to make rental payments directly to the
Company during the period that the transaction is in process, and the lessee
generally is obligated to reimburse the Company for all disbursements under
certain circumstances. Income is not recognized while a transaction
is in process and prior to the commencement of the lease. At December 31, 2009,
the Company’s investment in property acquired for transactions in process of
$6.9 million related to approximately $63.9 million of approved lease
commitments. This investment in transactions in process decreased
$5.4 million from $12.4 million at June 30, 2009, which related to approved
lease commitments of $79.9 million, and was down from $19.1 million at December
31 2008, which related to approved lease commitments of $57.1 million. In
addition to the approved lease commitments, CalFirst Bank had an unfunded loan
commitment at December 31, 2009 of $700,000.
The Company monitors the performance of
all leases and loans held in its own portfolio, transactions in process, as well
as lease transactions assigned to lenders, if the Company retains a residual
investment in the leased property subject to those leases. An ongoing review of
all leases and loans ten or more day’s delinquent is conducted. Lessees and
loans that are delinquent with the Company or an assignee are coded in the
Company’s accounting and tracking systems in order to provide management
visibility, periodic reporting, and appropriate reserves. The accrual of
interest income on leases and loans generally will be discontinued when the
lease or loan becomes ninety days or more past due on its payments with the
Company, unless the Company believes the investment is otherwise recoverable.
Leases and loans may be placed on non-accrual earlier if the Company has
significant doubts about the ability of the customer to meet its obligations, as
evidenced by consistent delinquency, deterioration in the customer’s financial
condition or other relevant factors.
The following
table summarizes the Company’s non-performing leases and
loans.
December
31, 2009
|
June
30, 2009
|
|||||||
Non-performing
Leases and Loans
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||
Non-accrual
leases
|
$ | 1,509 | $ | 1,399 | ||||
Restructured
leases and loans
|
8,292 | 8,437 | ||||||
Leases
past due 90 days (other than above)
|
- | 293 | ||||||
Total
non-performing leases and loans
|
$ | 9,801 | $ | 10,129 | ||||
Non-performing
assets as % of net investment
|
||||||||
in
leases and loans before allowances
|
3.6% | 3.5% |
18
The
decrease in non-performing leases and loans at December 31, 2009 from June 30,
2009 primarily reflects the receipt of payments on problem accounts that offset
the addition of a few new problem leases. The restructured lease and loan
balance for both periods includes a loan and lease with one customer with an
aggregate balance of approximately $8.1 million. This relationship
was current with its restructured payments at December 31, 2009 and the
transactions remain on an accrual basis. In addition to the non-performing
leases and loans identified above, there was $1.7 million of investment in
leases at December 31, 2009 classified as substandard or with credits that
currently are experiencing financial difficulties or that management believes
may experience financial difficulties in the future. Although these
credits have been identified as potential problems, they may never become
non-performing. These potential problem leases and loans are considered in the
determination of the allowance for credit losses.
Allowance
for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses
provides coverage for probable and estimatable losses in the Company’s lease and
loan portfolios. The allowance recorded is based on a quarterly review of all
leases and loans outstanding and transactions in process. Lease receivables,
loans or residuals are charged off when they are deemed completely
uncollectible. The determination of the appropriate amount of any provision is
based on management’s judgment at that time and takes into consideration all
known relevant internal and external factors that may affect the
portfolios.
Six
months ended
|
||||||||
December
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||
Property
acquired for transactions in process before allowance
|
$ | 7,168 | $ | 26,247 | ||||
Net
investment in leases and loans before allowance
|
275,028 | 285,564 | ||||||
Net
investment in “risk assets”
|
$ | 282,196 | $ | 311,811 | ||||
Allowance
for credit losses at beginning of period
|
$ | 4,830 | $ | 3,921 | ||||
Charge-off
of lease receivables
|
(74 | ) | (74 | ) | ||||
Recovery
of amounts previously written off
|
44 | 13 | ||||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
350 | 875 | ||||||
Allowance
for credit losses at end of period
|
$ | 5,150 | $ | 4,735 | ||||
Components
of allowance for credit losses:
|
||||||||
Allowance
for lease losses
|
$ | 3,365 | $ | 3,650 | ||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
1,522 | 872 | ||||||
Liability
for unfunded loan commitments
|
20 | 20 | ||||||
Allowance
for transactions in process
|
243 | 193 | ||||||
$ | 5,150 | $ | 4,735 | |||||
Allowance
for credit losses as a percent of net investment
|
||||||||
in
leases and loans before allowances
|
1.8 | % | 1.7 | % | ||||
Allowance
for credit losses as a percent of net investment in “risk
assets”
|
1.8 | % | 1.5 | % |
The allowance for credit losses
increased $320,000 to $5.2 million (1.8% of net investment in leases and loans
before allowances) at December 31, 2009 from $4.8 million (1.6% of net
investment in leases and loans before allowances) at June 30, 2009. This
allowance consisted of $2.2 million allocated to specific accounts that were
identified as problems and $2.9 million that was available to cover losses
inherent in the portfolio. This compared to $1.9 million allocated to specific
accounts at June 30, 2009 and $3.0 million available for losses inherent in the
portfolio at that time. The increase in the specific allowance at December 31,
2009 primarily relates to the addition of specifically identified substandard
loans. The Company considers the allowance for credit losses of $5.2
million at December 31, 2009 adequate to cover losses specifically identified as
well as inherent in the lease and loan portfolios. However, no assurance can be
given that the Company will not, in any particular period, sustain lease and
loan losses that are sizeable in relation to the amount reserved, or that
subsequent evaluations of the lease and loan portfolio, in light of factors then
prevailing, including economic conditions and the on-going credit review
process, will not require significant increases in the allowance for credit
losses. Among other factors, economic and political events may have an adverse
impact on the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses by increasing credit
risk and the risk of potential loss even further.
19
Investment
Securities
Total investment securities, both
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, were $77.0 million as of December 31,
2009, compared with $119.6 million at June 30, 2009. At December 31, 2009,
the securities portfolio included an unrealized pre-tax gain of $3.5 million
compared to a $2.2 million unrealized pre-tax gain at June 30, 2009. During the
six months ended December 31, 2009, the Company realized a net gain of $3.4
million on the sale of trust-preferred securities, U.S. agency collateralized
mortgage obligations, a corporate bond and an equity security held in the
Company’s portfolio. During the same period, the Company purchased $21.1 million
of corporate bonds and $600,000 of Federal Reserve Bank Stock.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
The Company funds its operating
activities through internally generated funds, bank deposits and non-recourse
debt. At December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the Company’s cash and cash
equivalents were $74.8 million and $55.2 million,
respectively. Stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2009 was $193.1
million, or 43% of total assets, compared to $191.4 million, or 39% of total
assets, at June 30, 2009. At December 31, 2009, the Company and the
Bank exceed their regulatory capital requirements and are considered
“well-capitalized” under guidelines established by the FRB and OCC.
Deposits at CalFirst Bank totaled
$213.2 million at December 31, 2009, compared to $182.0 million at December 31,
2008 and $220.9 million at June 30, 2009. The $31.2 million increase from
December 31, 2008 was used to fund leases, loans and the Bank’s growth in the
investment portfolio, as well as maintain liquidity at the Bank. The following
table presents average balances and average rates paid on deposits for the six
months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
Six
months ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Average
|
Average
|
Average
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||
Balance
|
Rate
Paid
|
Balance
|
Rate
Paid
|
|||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
$ | 1,830 | n/a | $ | 1,805 | n/a | ||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
122 | 0.50 | % | 257 | 0.50 | % | ||||||||||
Money
market deposits
|
71,424 | 1.31 | % | 45,359 | 3.12 | % | ||||||||||
Time
deposits less than $100,000
|
69,361 | 2.89 | % | 59,311 | 4.14 | % | ||||||||||
Time
deposits, $100,000 or more
|
$ | 84,236 | 2.83 | % | $ | 60,086 | 4.24 | % |
The
following table shows the maturities of certificates of deposits at the dates
indicated:
December
31, 2009
|
||||||||
Less
Than
|
Greater
Than
|
|||||||
$100,000 | $100,000 | |||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Under
3 months
|
$ | 23,868 | $ | 18,897 | ||||
3 -
6 months
|
13,159 | 16,538 | ||||||
6 -
12 months
|
14,416 | 27,613 | ||||||
Over
12 months
|
14,232 | 15,675 | ||||||
$ | 65,675 | $ | 78,723 |
During fiscal 2009, the Bank entered
into borrowing agreements with the Federal Home Loan Bank of San
Francisco. The Bank had outstanding balance of $10.0 million under a
long-term FHLB agreement at December 31, 2009 that matures in January 2012 and
is collateralized by a pledge of certain investment securities of the Bank, with $2.0
million still available under this agreement. The Bank also may
borrow from the Federal Reserve Discount Window amounts secured by certain lease
receivables. The Bank had no borrowings under this agreement at December 31,
2009, with the total availability estimated to be approximately $55 million. The
Bank may elect from time-to-time to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank rather
than the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco to maintain an immediate
secondary source of liquidity.
20
CalFirst Leasing’s capital expenditures
for leased property purchases are sometimes financed by assigning certain lease
term payments to banks or other financial institutions, including CalFirst
Bank. The assigned lease payments are discounted at fixed rates such
that the lease payments are sufficient to fully amortize the aggregate
outstanding debt. At December 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding non-recourse
debt aggregating $16.3 million relating to discounted lease rentals assigned to
unaffiliated lenders. In the past, the Company has been able to obtain adequate
non-recourse funding commitments, and the Company believes it will be able to do
so in the future.
As of December 31, 2009, CalFirst
Leasing had a $15 million line of credit with a bank (“Lender”). The purpose of
the line is to provide resources as needed for investment in transactions in
process and leases. The agreement, as amended, provides for
borrowings based on Libor, requires a commitment fee on the unused line balance
and allows for advances through March 31, 2010. The agreement is
unsecured, however, the Company guarantees CalFirst Leasing’s
obligations. No borrowings have been made under this line of credit
as of December 31, 2009.
Contractual Obligations and
Commitments
The following table summarizes various
contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009. Commitments to purchase
property for leases are binding and generally have fixed expiration dates or
other termination clauses. Commercial loan commitments are agreements to lend to
a customer or purchase a participation provided there is no violation of any
condition in the contract. These commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since the
Company expects some of the commitments to expire without being funded, the
total amounts do not necessarily represent the Company’s future liquidity
requirements.
Due
by Period
|
||||||||||||||||
Less
Than
|
After
|
|||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations
|
Total
|
1
Year
|
1-5
Years
|
5
Years
|
||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Commercial
loan commitments
|
$ | 700 | $ | 700 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Lease
property purchases (1)
|
54,635 | 54,635 | - | - | ||||||||||||
FHLB
Borrowings
|
10,000 | - | 10,000 | - | ||||||||||||
Operating
lease rental expense
|
3,953 | 776 | 3,177 | - | ||||||||||||
Total
contractual commitments
|
$ | 69,288 | $ | 56,111 | $ | 13,177 | $ | - | ||||||||
(1)
|
Disbursements
to purchase property on approved leases are estimated to be completed
within one year, but it is likely that some portion could be deferred to
later periods.
|
The need for cash for operating
activities will increase as the Company expands. The Company believes
that existing cash balances, cash flow from operations, cash flows from its
financing and investing activities, and assignments (on a non-recourse basis) of
lease payments will be sufficient to meet its foreseeable financing
needs.
Inflation has not had a significant
impact upon the operations of the Company.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk of loss of
value in a financial instrument arising from changes in market indices such as
interest rates, credit spreads and securities prices. The Company’s
principal market risk exposure is interest rate risk, which is the exposure due
to differences in the repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. Market risk also arises from the impact that
fluctuations in interest rates may have on security prices that may result in
changes in the values of financial instruments, such as available-for-sale
securities that are accounted for at fair value. As the banking operations of
the Company have grown and CalFirst Bank’s deposits represent a greater portion
of the Company’s liabilities, the Company is subject to increased interest rate
risk. The Bank has an Asset/Liability Management Committee and policies
established to manage its interest rate risk. CalFirst Leasing has no
interest-bearing debt, and non-recourse debt does not represent an interest rate
risk to the Company because it is fully amortized through direct payments from
lessees to the purchaser of the lease receivable.
At December 31, 2009, the Company had
$74.8 million of cash or invested in securities of very short duration. The
Company’s investment in lease payments receivable and commercial loans of $270.1
million consists of leases with fixed rates and loans with variable rates,
however, $164.8 million of such investment is due within one year of December
31, 2009. Of the $77.0 million investment in securities, $8.0 million mature
within twelve months. This compares to interest bearing deposit liabilities and
FHLB and FRB borrowings of $223.2 million, of which $182.6 million mature within
one year. Based on the foregoing, at December 31, 2009 the Company had assets of
$247.6 million subject to changes in interest rates over the next twelve months,
compared to repricing liabilities of $182.6 million.
21
The consolidated gap analysis below
sets forth the maturity and repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities for selected time bands. The mismatch between
repricings or maturities within a time band is commonly referred to as the “gap”
for that period. A positive gap (asset sensitive), where interest rate sensitive
assets exceed interest rate sensitive liabilities, generally will result in the
net interest margin increasing in a rising rate environment and decreasing in a
falling rate environment. A negative gap (liability sensitive) will generally
have the opposite result on the net interest margin. The gap analysis at
December 31, 2009 presented below indicates that net interest income should
increase during periods of rising interest rates and decrease during periods of
falling interest rates. However, the static gap analysis does not assess the
relative sensitivity of assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates and
other factors that could have an impact on interest rate sensitivity or net
interest income, including the protection provided by interest rate floors
incorporated into a number of commercial loans. Sudden and substantial changes
in interest rates may adversely impact income to the extent that the interest
rates associated with the assets and liabilities do not change at the same
speed, to the same extent, or on the same basis.
Consolidated Interest Rate
Sensitivity
Over
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
3
Months
|
Over
3 to
|
Through
|
Over
|
Non-rate
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
or
Less
|
12
Months
|
5
years
|
5
years
|
Sensitive
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Rate Sensitive Assets
(RSA):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
due from banks
|
$ | 74,831 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 74,831 | ||||||||||||
Investment
securities
|
2,917 | 5,075 | 59,210 | 9,815 | - | 77,017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
investment in leases
|
22,152 | 82,039 | 126,133 | - | (26,490 | ) | 203,834 | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial
loans
|
60,386 | - | 9,603 | - | (3,702 | ) | 66,287 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
earning assets
|
- | - | - | - | 30,303 | 30,303 | ||||||||||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 160,286 | $ | 87,114 | $ | 194,946 | $ | 9,815 | $ | 111 | $ | 452,272 | ||||||||||||
Cumulative
total for RSA
|
$ | 160,286 | $ | 247,400 | $ | 442,346 | $ | 452,161 | ||||||||||||||||
Rate Sensitive Liabilities
(RSL):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand
and savings deposits
|
$ | 68,082 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 692 | $ | 68,774 | ||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
42,765 | 71,726 | 29,907 | - | - | 144,398 | ||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings
|
- | - | 10,000 | - | - | 10,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
bearing liabilities
|
- | - | - | - | 35,988 | 35,988 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
- | - | - | - | 193,112 | 193,112 | ||||||||||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 110,847 | $ | 71,726 | $ | 39,907 | $ | - | $ | 229,792 | $ | 452,272 | ||||||||||||
Cumulative
total for RSL
|
$ | 110,847 | $ | 182,573 | $ | 222,480 | $ | 222,480 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest
rate sensitivity gap
|
$ | 49,439 | $ | 15,388 | $ | 155,039 | $ | 9,815 | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulative
GAP
|
$ | 49,439 | $ | 64,827 | $ | 219,866 | $ | 229,681 | ||||||||||||||||
RSA
divided by RSL (cumulative)
|
144.60 | % | 135.51 | % | 198.83 | % | 203.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulative
GAP / total assets
|
10.93 | % | 14.33 | % | 48.61 | % | 50.78 | % |
In addition to the consolidated gap
analysis, CalFirst Bank measures its interest rate sensitivity through a
maturity gap analysis and income simulation models. The interest rate
sensitivity modeling includes the creation of prospective twelve month
"baseline" and "rate shocked" net interest income projections and requires
CalFirst Bank to estimate the impact of various factors on net interest income
using assumptions that the Bank deems reasonable. These factors include actual
maturities, estimated cash flows, repricing characteristics, deposit growth and
retention and the relative sensitivity of the Bank’s assets and liabilities to
changes in market interest rates. As of December 31, 2009, CalFirst Bank’s
analysis estimated that the Bank’s projected net interest income would increase
by approximately 3% from the base case scenario over the next 12 months if
interest rates were to sustain an immediate increase of 100 basis points, and
would increase by an estimated 11% to 17% with a 200 to 300 basis point rise in
rates over 12 months. Assuming a 100 basis point decline in rates,
the model estimated an approximate 4% increase in net interest income from an
unchanged rate environment. The likelihood of a decrease in interest rates
beyond 100 basis points as of December 31, 2009 was considered to be remote
given current interest rate levels.
22
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures.
As of the
end of the period covered by this report, the Company's management, including
its principal executive officer and its principal financial officer, evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as such
term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2009 to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or
submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. There were no changes made during the
most recent fiscal quarter to the Company's internal controls over financial
reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II - OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
There have
been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table summarizes share
repurchase activity for the quarter ended December 31, 2009:
Maximum
Number
|
||||||||||||
Total
number
|
of
shares that may
|
|||||||||||
of
shares
|
Average
price
|
yet
be purchased
|
||||||||||
Period
|
Purchased
|
paid
per share
|
under
the plan (1)
|
|||||||||
October
1, 2009 – October 31, 2009
|
3,327 | $ | 10.93 | 370,698 | ||||||||
November
1, 2009 - November 30, 2009
|
504 | $ | 12.68 | 374,194 | ||||||||
December
1, 2009 - December 31, 2009
|
1,840 | $ | 12.55 | 368,354 | ||||||||
5,671 | $ | 11.61 |
1)
|
In
April 2001, the Board of Directors authorized management, at its
discretion, to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common
stock.
|
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits | Page | ||||
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Executive Officer | 25 | |||
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Financial Officer | 26 | |||
32.1 | Section 1350 Certifications by Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer | 27 |
23
CALIFORNIA
FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
California First National Bancorp | |||||||
Registrant | |||||||
DATE: | 2/12/2010 | BY: | /s/ S. Leslie Jewett | ||||
S. LESLIE JEWETT | |||||||
Chief Financial Officer | |||||||
(Principal Financial and | |||||||
Accounting Officer) |
24