CALIFORNIA FIRST LEASING CORP - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[Mark One]
[X]
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
|
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
[ ]
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
|
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from ____________________________ to _____________________________
Commission File No.: 0-15641
California First National Bancorp
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
California
|
33-0964185
|
|||
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
|||
incorporation or organization)
|
Identification No.)
|
18201 Von Karman, Suite 800
|
||||
Irvine, California
|
92612
|
|||
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (949) 255-0500
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated filer o
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
Smaller Reporting Company þ
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, as of April 30, 2010 was 10,225,105.
CALIFORNIA FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
INDEX
PAGE
|
||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
NUMBER | |
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets - March 31,
|
||
2010 and June 30, 2009
|
3
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Earnings – Three and nine
|
||
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
4
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Nine months
|
||
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
5
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity – Nine months
|
||
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
6
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7-13
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial | |
Condition and Results of Operations
|
14-21
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
21-23 |
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures |
23
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
23 |
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
23 |
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
23 |
Signature
|
24 |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, the information concerning our possible future consolidated results of operations, business and growth strategies, financing plans, our competitive position and the effects of competition. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by forward-looking words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “could”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “may”, “should”, “will”, “would”, “project” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, and certain factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Particular uncertainties arise from the behavior of financial markets, including fluctuations in interest rates and securities prices, from unanticipated changes in the risk characteristics of the lease and loan portfolio, the level of defaults and a change in the provision for credit losses, and from numerous other matters of national, regional and global scale, including those of a political, economic, business, competitive or regulatory nature. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligations to update any forward-looking statements. Management does not undertake to update our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date on which they are made.
CALIFORNIA FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(thousands, except for share amounts)
March 31,
|
June 30,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS |
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Cash and due from banks
|
$ | 81,512 | $ | 43,222 | ||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
- | 11,995 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
81,512 | 55,217 | ||||||
Available-for-sale investment securities
|
72,798 | 115,530 | ||||||
Held-to-maturity investment securities
|
4,384 | 4,070 | ||||||
Net receivables
|
2,586 | 3,508 | ||||||
Property acquired for transactions in process
|
10,473 | 12,373 | ||||||
Leases and loans:
|
||||||||
Leases
|
201,946 | 216,918 | ||||||
Commercial loans
|
59,533 | 72,402 | ||||||
Allowance for credit losses
|
(4,887 | ) | (4,567 | ) | ||||
Net investment in leases and loans
|
256,592 | 284,753 | ||||||
Net property on operating leases
|
1,430 | 1,557 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable
|
272 | 3,968 | ||||||
Other assets
|
1,311 | 1,007 | ||||||
Discounted lease rentals assigned to lenders
|
16,206 | 6,989 | ||||||
$ | 447,564 | $ | 488,972 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | 819 | $ | 2,569 | ||||
Accrued liabilities
|
2,956 | 4,918 | ||||||
Demand and money market deposits
|
66,005 | 70,217 | ||||||
Time certificates of deposit
|
138,843 | 150,727 | ||||||
Lease deposits
|
3,444 | 4,060 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings
|
- | 35,444 | ||||||
Long-term borrowings
|
10,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Non-recourse debt
|
16,206 | 6,989 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes – including income taxes payable, net
|
13,058 | 12,672 | ||||||
251,331 | 297,596 | |||||||
Commitments and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders' equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred stock; 2,500,000 shares authorized; none issued
|
- | - | ||||||
Common stock; $.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 10,225,105
(March 2010) and 10,145,785 (June 2009) issued and outstanding
|
102 | 101 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital
|
1,103 | 395 | ||||||
Retained earnings
|
192,542 | 189,528 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
2,486 | 1,352 | ||||||
196,233 | 191,376 | |||||||
$ | 447,564 | $ | 488,972 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CALIFORNIA FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
(thousands, except for per share amounts)
Three months ended
|
Nine months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
March 31,
|
March 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Direct finance and loan income
|
$ | 5,519 | $ | 6,239 | $ | 17,002 | $ | 19,005 | ||||||||
Investment interest income
|
1,066 | 1,392 | 3,740 | 2,969 | ||||||||||||
Total direct finance, loan and interest income
|
6,585 | 7,631 | 20,742 | 21,974 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
1,042 | 1,649 | 3,729 | 4,885 | ||||||||||||
Borrowings
|
52 | 77 | 193 | 100 | ||||||||||||
Net direct finance, loan and interest income
|
5,491 | 5,905 | 16,820 | 16,989 | ||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses
|
- | 300 | 350 | 1,175 | ||||||||||||
Net direct finance, loan and interest income
|
||||||||||||||||
after provision for credit losses
|
5,491 | 5,605 | 16,470 | 15,814 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating and sales-type lease income
|
373 | 1,040 | 1,393 | 2,748 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of leases and leased property
|
1,022 | 1,116 | 1,508 | 2,895 | ||||||||||||
Realized gain on sale of investment securities
|
- | - | 3,436 | - | ||||||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment loss
|
- | (869 | ) | - | (869 | ) | ||||||||||
Other fee income
|
197 | 111 | 681 | 505 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest income
|
1,592 | 1,398 | 7,018 | 5,279 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
7,083 | 7,003 | 23,488 | 21,093 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits
|
2,035 | 2,400 | 6,186 | 7,661 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy
|
232 | 234 | 698 | 743 | ||||||||||||
Professional services
|
126 | 140 | 374 | 440 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
485 | 415 | 1,450 | 1,525 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest expenses
|
2,878 | 3,189 | 8,708 | 10,369 | ||||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes
|
4,205 | 3,814 | 14,780 | 10,724 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
1,609 | 1,431 | 5,654 | 4,022 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 2,596 | $ | 2,383 | $ | 9,126 | $ | 6,702 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per common share
|
$ | .25 | $ | .23 | $ | .90 | $ | .64 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share
|
$ | .25 | $ | .23 | $ | .89 | $ | .64 | ||||||||
Dividends declared per common share outstanding
|
$ | - | $ | .12 | $ | .60 | $ | .36 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
10,204 | 10,159 | 10,187 | 10,394 | ||||||||||||
Diluted common shares outstanding
|
10,316 | 10,199 | 10,294 | 10,455 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
CALIFORNIA FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||
March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net Earnings
|
$ | 9,126 | $ | 6,702 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
457 | 351 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
- | 12 | ||||||
Leased property on operating leases, net
|
(247 | ) | (191 | ) | ||||
Interest accretion of estimated residual values
|
(1,061 | ) | (982 | ) | ||||
Gain on sale of leased property and sales-type lease income
|
(261 | ) | (722 | ) | ||||
Net (gain) losses recognized on investment securities
|
(3,436 | ) | 869 | |||||
Provision for credit losses
|
350 | 1,175 | ||||||
Amortization of premiums or discounts on securities and loans, net
|
(957 | ) | (1,162 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes, including income taxes payable
|
(270 | ) | 1,724 | |||||
Decrease (increase) in net receivables
|
922 | (859 | ) | |||||
Decrease in income taxes receivable
|
3,696 | 1,989 | ||||||
Net decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(3,712 | ) | (615 | ) | ||||
Decrease in lease deposits
|
(616 | ) | (1,022 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
3,991 | 7,269 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Investment in leases, loans and transactions in process
|
(102,261 | ) | (147,302 | ) | ||||
Payments received on lease receivables and loans
|
131,243 | 135,108 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of leased property and sales-type leases
|
3,226 | 4,778 | ||||||
Purchase of investment securities
|
(21,660 | ) | (82,926 | ) | ||||
Pay down of investment securities
|
288 | 147 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of investment securities
|
68,796 | - | ||||||
Net (increase) decrease in other assets
|
(385 | ) | 296 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities
|
79,247 | (89,899 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in time certificates of deposit
|
(11,884 | ) | 25,755 | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in demand and money market deposits
|
(4,212 | ) | 23,555 | |||||
Net (repayment of) proceeds from short-term borrowings
|
(35,444 | ) | 35,444 | |||||
Net proceeds from long-term borrowings
|
- | 10,000 | ||||||
Payments to repurchase common stock
|
(305 | ) | (17,101 | ) | ||||
Dividends to stockholders
|
(6,112 | ) | (3,657 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
1,014 | 151 | ||||||
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities
|
(56,943 | ) | 74,147 | |||||
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
26,295 | (8,483 | ) | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
55,217 | 71,790 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
$ | 81,512 | $ | 63,307 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Increase (decrease) in lease rentals assigned to lenders and related non-recourse debt
|
$ | 9,217 | $ | (903 | ) | |||
Estimated residual values recorded on leases
|
$ | (5,042 | ) | $ | (1,947 | ) | ||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
||||||||
Cash paid during the nine month period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 4,049 | $ | 4,906 | ||||
Income Taxes
|
$ | 2,336 | $ | 309 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
CALIFORNIA FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except for share amounts)
Additional
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Paid in
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Income
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Nine months ended March 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2008
|
11,440,725 | $ | 114 | $ | 7,003 | $ | 195,611 | $ | (273 | ) | $ | 202,455 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
- | - | - | 6,702 | - | 6,702 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on investment securities,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
net of tax
|
- | - | - | - | (1,324 | ) | (1,324 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment - other than
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
temporary impairment loss, net of tax
|
- | - | - | - | 543 | 543 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
5,921 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued - Stock options exercised
|
18,470 | 1 | 150 | - | - | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||
Shares repurchased
|
(1,300,000 | ) | (13 | ) | (6,770 | ) | (10,318 | ) | - | (17,101 | ) | |||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
- | - | 12 | - | - | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared
|
- | - | - | (3,657 | ) | - | (3,657 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2009
|
10,159,195 | $ | 102 | $ | 395 | $ | 188,338 | $ | (1,054 | ) | $ | 187,781 | ||||||||||||
Nine months ended March 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2009
|
10,145,785 | $ | 101 | $ | 395 | $ | 189,528 | $ | 1,352 | $ | 191,376 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
- | - | - | 9,126 | - | 9,126 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on investment securities,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
net of tax
|
- | - | - | - | 3,256 | 3,256 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment - realized gains
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
of investment securities included in
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
net income, net of tax
|
- | - | - | - | (2,122 | ) | (2,122 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
10,260 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued - Stock options exercised
|
104,974 | 1 | 1,013 | - | - | 1,014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Shares repurchased
|
(25,654 | ) | - | (305 | ) | - | - | (305 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Dividends declared
|
- | - | - | (6,112 | ) | - | (6,112 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2010
|
10,225,105 | $ | 102 | $ | 1,103 | $ | 192,542 | $ | 2,486 | $ | 196,233 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
CALIFORNIA FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of California First National Bancorp (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries California First National Bank, an FDIC insured national bank, (“CalFirst Bank” or the “Bank”) and California First Leasing Corporation (“CalFirst Leasing”) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009. The material under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is written with the presumption that the readers have read or have access to the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which contains Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as of June 30, 2009 and for the year then ended.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the balance sheet as of March 31, 2010 and the statements of earnings, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the three and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. The results of operations for the three and nine month period ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the entire fiscal year ending June 30, 2010.
NOTE 2 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting pronouncement establishing the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (the “ASC”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. This pronouncement was effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, for most entities. On the effective date, all non-SEC accounting and reporting standards were superseded. The Company adopted this new accounting pronouncement for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as required, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
In April 2009, the FASB revised ASC Section 825-10-50, Financial Instruments — Disclosures (“ASC 825-50”), to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. ASC 825-50 requires entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements and any changes in these methods and assumptions from prior periods. The requirement to provide interim disclosures became effective for the Company for interim periods beginning after June 15, 2009. In periods after initial adoption, the Company is required to provide comparative disclosures only for periods ending after initial adoption. The disclosure requirements of ASC 825-50 have been incorporated into this Form 10-Q as required.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements,” which added disclosure requirements about transfers in and out of tiers, clarified existing fair value disclosure requirements about the appropriate level of disaggregation, and clarified that a description of valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value was required for recurring and nonrecurring Level 2 and 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of these provisions of this ASU for the period ended March 31, 2010 only affected the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and as a result had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events: Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASC 855”). The amendments remove the requirement for an SEC registrant to disclose the date through which subsequent events were evaluated, as this requirement would have potentially conflicted with SEC reporting requirements. Removal of the disclosure requirement is not expected to affect the nature or timing of subsequent events evaluations performed by the Company. This ASU became effective upon issuance.
NOTE 3 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
At March 31, 2010, the Company has one stock option plan, which is more fully described in Note 11 in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. On July 1, 2005, the Company implemented Topic 718 in the ASC, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”) under the “modified prospective method” where stock-based compensation expense is recorded beginning on the adoption date and prior periods are not restated. Compensation expense is recognized using the fair-value based method for all new awards granted after July 1, 2005, while compensation expense for unvested stock options outstanding at July 1, 2005 is recognized over the requisite service period based on the fair value of those options as previously calculated at the grant date under the pro-forma disclosures of ASC 718. The fair value of each grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and valuation variables utilized at the grant dates as discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K in the respective years of the original grants.
7
During the nine months ended March 31, 2010, there was no pre-tax stock-based compensation expense compared to $12,000 recognized during the first nine months of fiscal 2009. As of March 31, 2010, the Company has no more unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested shares. The Company has not awarded any new grants since fiscal 2004.
The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the periods indicated:
Nine months ended
March 31, 2010
|
Nine months ended
March 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
Shares
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|||||||||||||
Options outstanding at the beginning of period
|
344,038 | $ | 8.49 | 451,374 | $ | 9.18 | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
(104,974 | ) | 9.66 | (18,470 | ) | 8.13 | ||||||||||
Canceled/expired
|
- | - | (55,405 | ) | 12.82 | |||||||||||
Options outstanding at end of period
|
239,064 | $ | 7.98 | 377,499 | $ | 8.69 | ||||||||||
Options exercisable
|
239,064 | 377,499 |
As of March 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||
Options exercisable and outstanding
|
||||||||||||||
Range of
Exercise prices
|
Number
Exercisable and
Outstanding
|
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
Life (in years)
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|||||||||||
$ | 5.20 - $ 8.81 | 165,533 | 1.18 | $ | 6.13 | |||||||||
9.96 - 12.49 | 73,531 | 2.59 | 12.15 | |||||||||||
$ | 5.20 - $12.49 | 239,064 | 1.62 | $ | 7.98 |
NOTE 4 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
On July 1, 2008, the Company adopted Topic 820 in the ASC, “Fair Value Measurements” (“ASC 820”). ASC 820, among other things, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. The adoption of ASC 820 had no material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability. ASC 820 establishes a three-tiered value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs based on the extent to which inputs used are observable in the market and requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. If a value is based on inputs that fall in different levels of the hierarchy, the instrument will be categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value calculation. The three levels of inputs are defined as follows:
·
|
Level 1 - Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets;
|
·
|
Level 2 - Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market;
|
·
|
Level 3 - Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use inputs not observable in the market. Level 3 valuation techniques could include the use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and rely on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
|
ASC 820 applies whenever other accounting pronouncements require presentation of fair value measurements, but does not change existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value. As such, ASC 820 does not apply to the Company’s investment in leases or investment securities held to maturity. The Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis include primarily securities available-for-sale and at March 31, 2010, there were no liabilities subject to ASC 820.
8
Securities available-for-sale include corporate bonds, mutual fund investments, and U.S. Treasury securities and generally are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. The fair value of corporate bonds are obtained from independent quotation bureaus that use computerized valuation formulas to calculate current values or for less actively traded issues, by utilizing a yield-based matrix system to arrive at an estimated market value (Level 2 input). Publicly traded mutual funds are valued by reference to the market closing or last trade price (Level 1 inputs). In the unlikely event that no trade occurred on the applicable date, an indicative bid or the last trade most proximate to the applicable date would be used (Level 2 input). There were no transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2.
The following table summarizes the Company’s assets, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2010:
Description of Assets / Liabilities
|
Total
Fair Value |
Quoted Price in
Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3) |
||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Securities
|
$ | 10,595 | $ | 10,595 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Corporate bonds
|
58,959 | - | 58,959 | - | ||||||||||||
Mutual fund investments
|
3,244 | 3,244 | - | - | ||||||||||||
|
$ | 72,798 | $ | 13,839 | $ | 58,959 | $ | - |
Certain financial instruments, such as impaired loans and unfunded loan commitments, are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances, usually if there was evidence of impairment. The Company had no such assets or liabilities at March 31, 2010.
NOTE 5 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
In accordance with ASC 825-50, the following table summarizes the estimated fair value of financial instruments as of March 31, 2010, and June 30, 2009, and includes financial instruments that are not accounted for or carried at fair value. In accordance with disclosure guidance, certain financial instruments, including all lease related assets and liabilities and all non-financial instruments are excluded from fair value of financial instrument disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate of the fair values presented does not represent the total underlying value of the Company. These fair value estimates are based on relevant market information and data, however, given there is no active market or observable market transactions for certain financial instruments, the Company has made estimates of fair values which are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimated values.
For cash and cash equivalents, demand deposits, short-term borrowings, and certain commercial loans that re-price frequently, the fair value is estimated to equal the carrying cost. Values for available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are determined as set forth in Note 4. The fair value of loan participations purchased in the secondary market is based upon current bid prices in such market at the measurement date. For other loans, the estimated fair value is calculated based on discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. These calculations have been adjusted for credit risk based on the Company’s historical credit loss experience. The fair value of certificates of deposit and long-term borrowings is estimated based on discounted cash flows using current offered market rates or interest rates for borrowings of similar maturity.
9
March 31, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying
|
Estimated
|
Carrying
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||
Amount
|
Fair Value
|
Amount
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 81,512 | $ | 81,512 | $ | 55,217 | $ | 55,217 | ||||||||
Held-to-maturity investment securities
|
4,384 | 4,448 | 4,070 | 4,126 | ||||||||||||
Available-for-sale investment securities
|
72,798 | 72,798 | 115,530 | 115,530 | ||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
58,011 | 59,323 | 71,130 | 70,309 | ||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Demand and savings deposits
|
$ | 66,005 | $ | 66,005 | $ | 70,217 | $ | 70,217 | ||||||||
Time certificate of deposits
|
138,843 | 139,444 | 150,727 | 151,743 | ||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings
|
- | - | 35,444 | 35,444 | ||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings
|
$ | 10,000 | $ | 10,046 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 9,980 |
NOTE 6 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The Company’s investment securities are classified as held-to-maturity and available-for-sale. The amortized cost, fair value, and carrying value of investment securities were as follows:
At March 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Gross Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Carrying
|
|||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
Cost
|
Gains / (Losses)
|
Value
|
Value
|
||||||||||||
Available-for-sale
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities
|
$ | 10,152 | $ | 443 | $ | 10,595 | $ | 10,595 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds
|
56,044 | 2,915 | 58,959 | 58,959 | ||||||||||||
Mutual fund investments
|
2,702 | 542 | 3,244 | 3,244 | ||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale
|
68,898 | 3,900 | 72,798 | 72,798 | ||||||||||||
Held-to-maturity
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
|
1,063 | 64 | 1,127 | 1,063 | ||||||||||||
Federal Reserve Bank Stock
|
1,655 | - | 1,655 | 1,655 | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
1,666 | - | 1,666 | 1,666 | ||||||||||||
Total held-to-maturity
|
4,384 | 64 | 4,448 | 4,384 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities
|
$ | 73,282 | $ | 3,964 | $ | 77,246 | $ | 77,182 |
At June 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Gross Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Carrying
|
|||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
Cost
|
Gains / (Losses)
|
Value
|
Value
|
||||||||||||
Available-for-sale
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Agency collateralized mortgage obligations
|
$ | 45,673 | $ | 895 | $ | 46,568 | $ | 46,568 | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities
|
10,167 | 19 | 10,186 | 10,186 | ||||||||||||
Corporate bonds
|
39,695 | 597 | 40,292 | 40,292 | ||||||||||||
Trust preferred securities
|
14,605 | 915 | 15,520 | 15,520 | ||||||||||||
Mutual fund investment
|
2,702 | (238 | ) | 2,464 | 2,464 | |||||||||||
Equity investment
|
578 | (78 | ) | 500 | 500 | |||||||||||
Total available-for-sale
|
113,420 | 2,110 | 115,530 | 115,530 | ||||||||||||
Held-to-maturity
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
|
1,349 | 56 | 1,405 | 1,349 | ||||||||||||
Federal Reserve Bank Stock
|
1,055 | - | 1,055 | 1,055 | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
1,666 | - | 1,666 | 1,666 | ||||||||||||
Total held-to-maturity
|
4,070 | 56 | 4,126 | 4,070 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities
|
$ | 117,490 | $ | 2,166 | $ | 119,656 | $ | 119,600 |
10
Securities classified as “available-for-sale” are carried at market value. Net aggregate unrealized gains or losses on these securities are included in a valuation allowance account of comprehensive income and are shown, net of taxes, as a component of shareholders’ equity. At March 31, 2010, approximately $10.0 million of U.S. Treasury Securities were pledged as collateral to secure certain borrowings.
Securities classified as “held-to-maturity” are two U.S. agency issued securities and the Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock. The Company has determined that it has the ability to hold these investments until maturity and, given the Company’s intent to do so, anticipates that it will realize the full carrying value of its investment and carries the securities at amortized cost.
The investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”) stock is a required investment related to borrowings from the FHLB. The FHLB obtains its funding primarily through issuance of consolidated obligations of the Federal Home Loan Bank system. The U.S. Government does not guarantee these obligations, and each of the 12 FHLB’s are generally jointly and severally liable for repayment of each other’s debt. Therefore, the Company’s investment could be adversely impacted by the financial operations of the FHLB and actions by the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
Gross realized gains and gross realized losses on investment securities are summarized below. During the nine months ended March 31, 2010, the Company realized a gain of $3.5 million on the sale of its investment in trust-preferred securities and U.S. Agency collateralized mortgage obligations. Proceeds from the sales were $65.6 million. The Company realized a loss of $27,000 on the sale of an equity investment and a corporate bond for proceeds of $2.6 million. In March 2009, the Company recorded a pre-tax impairment charge of $869,000 related to two closed-end fund investments held in the investment portfolio. These gains and losses are recognized using the specific identification method and are included in non-interest income.
Available-for-sale
|
||||||||
For the three months ended
|
||||||||
March 31
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
Gross realized gains
|
$ | 3,463 | $ | - | ||||
Gross realized losses
|
(27 | ) | - | |||||
Other than temporary impairment
|
- | (869 | ) | |||||
Total
|
$ | 3,436 | $ | (869 | ) |
The following tables present the fair value and associated gross unrealized losses only on available-for-sale securities with gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2009. The Company had no unrealized losses at March 31, 2010.
Less than 12 Months
|
12 Months or More
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Loss
|
Fair Value
|
Loss
|
Fair Value
|
Loss
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
At June 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity investment
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | (78 | ) | $ | 500 | $ | (78 | ) | $ | 500 | ||||||||||
Mutual fund investment
|
- | - | (238 | ) | 2,464 | (238 | ) | 2,464 | ||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | (316 | ) | $ | 2,964 | $ | (316 | ) | $ | 2,964 |
The Company conducts a regular assessment of its investment portfolios to determine whether any securities are other-than-temporarily impaired. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers, among other factors, length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and the Company’s ability and intention to not sell the investment prior to anticipated recovery. At of March 31, 2010, no securities were considered to be other than temporarily impaired.
11
NOTE 7 – NET INVESTMENT IN LEASES
The Company's net investment in leases consists of the following:
March 31, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
Minimum lease payments receivable
|
$ | 207,097 | $ | 229,041 | ||||
Estimated residual value
|
16,193 | 12,256 | ||||||
Less unearned income
|
(21,344 | ) | (24,379 | ) | ||||
Net investment in leases before allowances
|
201,946 | 216,918 | ||||||
Less allowance for lease losses
|
(3,252 | ) | (3,182 | ) | ||||
Less valuation allowance for estimated residual value
|
(113 | ) | (113 | ) | ||||
Net investment in leases
|
$ | 198,581 | $ | 213,623 |
The minimum lease payments receivable and estimated residual value are discounted using the internal rate of return method related to each specific capital lease. Unearned income includes the offset of initial direct costs of $4.4 million and $4.8 million at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
NOTE 8 – COMMERCIAL LOANS
The Company’s investment in commercial loans consists of the following:
March 31, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
Commercial loan participations
|
$ | 48,851 | $ | 63,064 | ||||
Commercial real estate loans
|
11,799 | 11,974 | ||||||
Revolving line of credit
|
600 | - | ||||||
Total commercial loans
|
61,250 | 75,038 | ||||||
Less unearned income and discounts
|
(1,717 | ) | (2,636 | ) | ||||
Less allowance for loan losses
|
(1,522 | ) | (1,272 | ) | ||||
Net commercial loans
|
$ | 58,011 | $ | 71,130 |
Commercial loans are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances reduced by the allowance for loan losses and net of any deferred fees or costs on originated loans, or unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are capitalized and recognized as an adjustment to the yield of the related commercial loan.
NOTE 9 – BORROWINGS
CalFirst Bank is a member of the FHLB and, as such, can take advantage of FHLB programs for overnight and term advances at published daily rates. Under terms of a blanket collateral agreement, advances from the FHLB are collateralized by qualifying investment securities. The Bank also has authority to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) discount window amounts secured by certain lease receivables.
Short-term and long-term borrowings and weighted average interest rates at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009 were as follows:
As of March 31, 2010
|
As of June 30, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
Amount
|
Average Rate
|
Amount
|
Average Rate
|
||||||||||||
Short-term Borrowings
|
||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances
|
$ | - | - | $ | 25,444 | 0.33 | % | |||||||||
FRB advances
|
- | - | 10,000 | 0.50 | % | |||||||||||
- | 35,444 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term Borrowings
|
||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances
|
10,000 | 2.07 | % | 10,000 | 2.07 | % | ||||||||||
$ | 10,000 | $ | 45,444 |
12
At March 31, 2010, CalFirst Bank had unused borrowing availability of approximately $60 million with the FRB and $2.2 million with the FHLB. Borrowing capacity from the FHLB or FRB may fluctuate based upon the acceptability and risk rating of securities, loan and lease collateral and both the FRB and FHLB could adjust advance rates applied to such collateral at their discretion. The principal amount of the long-term FHLB advance matures on January 9, 2012.
NOTE 10 – SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company’s two subsidiaries, CalFirst Leasing and CalFirst Bank, are considered to be two different business segments. Below is a summary of each segment’s financial results for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
CalFirst
|
CalFirst
|
Bancorp and
|
||||||||||||||
Leasing
|
Bank
|
Eliminating Entries
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Net direct, loan and interest income
|
||||||||||||||||
after provision for credit losses
|
$ | 2,433 | $ | 2,850 | $ | 208 | $ | 5,491 | ||||||||
Other income
|
1,459 | 133 | - | 1,592 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
3,892 | 2,983 | 208 | 7,083 | ||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 1,166 | $ | 1,393 | $ | 37 | $ | 2,596 | ||||||||
Quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Net direct, loan and interest income
|
||||||||||||||||
after provision for credit losses
|
$ | 3,003 | $ | 2,545 | $ | 57 | $ | 5,605 | ||||||||
Other income
|
1,570 | 339 | (511 | ) | 1,398 | |||||||||||
Gross profit
|
4,573 | 2,884 | (454 | ) | 7,003 | |||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 1,372 | $ | 1,253 | $ | (242 | ) | $ | 2,383 | |||||||
Nine months ended March 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Net direct, loan and interest income
|
||||||||||||||||
after provision for credit losses
|
$ | 7,576 | $ | 8,208 | $ | 686 | $ | 16,470 | ||||||||
Other income
|
3,132 | 3,888 | (2 | ) | 7,018 | |||||||||||
Gross profit
|
10,708 | 12,096 | 684 | 23,488 | ||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 2,889 | $ | 6,079 | $ | 158 | $ | 9,126 | ||||||||
Nine months ended March 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Net direct, loan and interest income
|
||||||||||||||||
after provision for credit losses
|
$ | 9,306 | $ | 6,279 | $ | 229 | $ | 15,814 | ||||||||
Other income
|
4,982 | 808 | (511 | ) | 5,279 | |||||||||||
Gross profit
|
14,288 | 7,087 | (282 | ) | 21,093 | |||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 3,710 | $ | 2,782 | $ | 210 | $ | 6,702 | ||||||||
Total assets at March 31, 2010
|
$ | 139,482 | $ | 291,629 | $ | 16,453 | $ | 447,564 | ||||||||
Total assets at March 31, 2009
|
$ | 160,844 | $ | 316,248 | $ | (11,571 | ) | $ | 465,521 |
NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has evaluated the impact of events that have occurred subsequent to March 31, 2010 and based on this evaluation, the Company determined none of these events require adjustment to the consolidated financial statements.
13
CALIFORNIA FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
California First National Bancorp, a California corporation, is a bank holding company headquartered in Orange County, California. CalFirst Leasing and CalFirst Bank focus on leasing and financing capital assets through centralized marketing programs designed to offer cost-effective leasing alternatives. Leased assets are re-marketed at lease expiration. CalFirst Bank also provides business loans to fund the purchase of assets leased by third parties, including CalFirst Leasing, purchases participations in commercial loan syndications and provides commercial loans to businesses, including real estate based and unsecured revolving lines of credit. CalFirst Bank gathers deposits from a centralized location primarily through posting rates on the Internet.
The Company’s direct finance, loan and interest income includes interest income earned on the Company’s investment in lease receivables, residuals, commercial loans and investment securities. Non-interest income primarily includes gains realized on the sale of leased property and leases, income from sales-type and operating leases, gains and losses realized on investments, and other fee income. Income from sales-type leases relates to the re-lease of lease property (“lease extensions”) while income from operating leases generally involves lease extensions that are accounted for as an operating lease rather than as a sales-type lease.
The Company's operating results are subject to quarterly fluctuations resulting from a variety of factors, including the size and credit quality of the lease and loan portfolios, the volume and profitability of leased property being re-marketed through re-lease or sale, the interest rate environment, the volume of new lease or loan originations, including variations in the mix and funding of such originations, the market for investment securities and economic conditions in general. The Company’s principal market risk exposure is interest rate risk, which is the exposure due to differences in the repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The Company’s balance sheet structure historically has been short-term in nature, with a greater portion of assets that reprice or mature within one year. With the increased investment in commercial loans and investment securities with longer maturities, this maturity gap has diminished. The Company’s interest margin also is susceptible to timing lags related to varying movements in market interest rates. Many of the Company’s leases, loans and liquid investments are tied to U.S. treasury rates and the fed funds rate that often do not move in step with bank deposit rates. As a result, this can result in a greater change in net interest income than indicated by the repricing asset and liability comparison.
The Company conducts its business in a manner designed to mitigate risks. However, the assumption of risk is a key source of earnings in the leasing and banking industries and the Company is subject to risks through its investment securities, leases and loans held in its own portfolio, lease transactions in process, and residual investments. The Company takes steps to manage risks through the implementation of strict credit management processes and on-going risk management review procedures.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires management to make certain critical accounting estimates that impact the stated amount of assets and liabilities at a financial statement date and the reported amount of income and expenses during a reporting period. These accounting estimates are based on management’s judgment and are considered to be critical because of their significance to the financial statements and the possibility that future events may differ from current judgments, or that the use of different assumptions could result in materially different estimates. The critical accounting policies and estimates have not changed from and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009.
The Company's estimates are reviewed continuously to ensure reasonableness. However, the amounts the Company may ultimately realize could differ from such estimated amounts.
Overview of Results and Trends
The following discussion is provided in addition to the required analysis of earnings in order to discuss trends in our business. We believe this analysis provides additional meaningful information on a comparative basis.
14
Net earnings for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 were up 9%, while results for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 were up 36% compared to the same periods of the prior year. The increase in net earnings for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 is primarily due to higher non-interest income and the reduction in non-interest expenses. For the first nine months of fiscal 2010, the increase in net earnings is primarily due to gains recorded on the sales of investment securities and higher interest income earned from the investment portfolio.
New lease bookings of $60.9 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were 17% lower than the first nine months of the prior year and included third quarter bookings of $13.2 million which were 53% below the prior year level. As a result, the net investment in leases of $198.6 million at March 31, 2010 was down 7% from the balance at June 30, 2009. Only $9.2 million of commercial loans were boarded during the first nine months of fiscal 2010,and following the early payoff of certain loans, the loan portfolio declined to $58.0 million at March 31, 2010 from $71.1 million at June 30, 2009. New lease originations for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were up 28% from the prior year, and the backlog of approved lease and loan commitments of $64.8 million is 64% greater than a year ago.
The Company’s portfolio of investment securities of $77.2 million at March 31, 2010 was down from $119.6 million at June 30, 2009 and from $87.4 million at March 31, 2009. The decrease during the first nine months of fiscal 2010 resulted from the sale of approximately $68.3 million of investment securities for a net gain of $3.4 million. Offsetting the sale of these investment securities was the acquisition of additional corporate bonds and unrealized gains within the investment portfolio.
Consolidated Statement of Earnings Analysis
Summary -- For the third quarter ended March 31, 2010, net earnings of $2.6 million increased $213,000, or 8.9%, from $2.4 million for the third quarter ended March 31, 2009. For the first nine months of fiscal 2010, net earnings of $9.1 million increased $2.4 million, or 36.2%, compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2009. Diluted earnings per share increased 8.5% to $0.25 per share for the third quarter of fiscal 2010, compared to $0.23 per share for the third quarter of the prior year. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, diluted earnings per share of $0.89 increased 38.3%, compared to $0.64 per shared for the same prior year period.
Net Direct Finance, Loan and Interest Income -- Net direct finance, loan and interest income is the difference between interest earned on the investment in leases, loans, securities and other interest earning investments and interest paid on deposits and other borrowings. Net direct finance, loan and interest income is affected by changes in the volume and mix of interest earning assets, the movement of interest rates, and funding and pricing strategies.
Net direct finance, loan and interest income was $5.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, a $414,000, or 7.0%, decrease compared to the same quarter of the prior year. Total direct finance, loan and interest income decreased 14% to $6.6 million compared to $7.6 million during the third quarter of the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a 17% decrease in direct finance income resulting from a lower average investment in capital leases and lower yields earned, and a $326,000 decrease in investment income as yields earned dropped by over 150 basis points. Together, this drop offset a $169,000 increase in loan income that resulted from a 105 basis point improvement in average commercial loan rates earned. Combined, the average yield on leases and loans held in the Company’s own portfolios decreased by 58 basis points to 8.3%. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, interest expense on deposits and borrowings decreased by $632,000 to $1.1 million, reflecting a 5% decrease in average deposit and borrowing balances to $220.4 million and a 100 basis point decrease in average interest rates paid to 2.0%
For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, net direct finance and interest income was $16.8 million, a $169,000, or 1.0% decrease from the $17.0 million earned during the same period of the prior year. Total direct finance, loan and interest income of $20.7 million for the first nine months of 2010 was down 6% from $22.0 million for the first nine months of the prior year. The decrease was due to a $2.2 million decline in direct finance income that offset a $771,000 increase in investment income and a $245,000 increase in income earned on the commercial loan portfolio. The average yield on leases and loans held in the Company’s own portfolio decreased by 100 basis points to 8.34%, while the average yield on cash and investments fell by 108 basis points to 2.99% on average cash and investment balances that were up 71% to $166.8 million. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, interest expense on deposits and borrowings decreased by $1.1 million to $3.9 million, reflecting a 28% increase in average balances offset by a 133 basis point decrease in average rates paid.
15
The following table presents the components of the increases (decreases) in net direct finance, loan and interest income by volume and rate:
Quarter ended
|
Nine Months ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2010 vs 2009
|
March 31, 2010 vs 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment in leases
|
$ | (366 | ) | $ | (523 | ) | $ | (889 | ) | $ | (1,062 | ) | $ | (1,186 | ) | $ | (2,248 | ) | ||||||
Commercial loans
|
1 | 168 | 169 | 759 | (514 | ) | 245 | |||||||||||||||||
Discounted lease rentals
|
107 | 2 | 109 | 49 | (6 | ) | 43 | |||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold
|
(8 | ) | - | (8 | ) | (166 | ) | (13 | ) | (179 | ) | |||||||||||||
Investment securities
|
54 | (320 | ) | (266 | ) | 2,976 | (1,675 | ) | 1,301 | |||||||||||||||
Interest-earning deposits with banks
|
67 | (119 | ) | (52 | ) | 362 | (713 | ) | (351 | ) | ||||||||||||||
(145 | ) | (792 | ) | (937 | ) | 2,918 | (4,107 | ) | (1,189 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse debt
|
107 | 2 | 109 | 49 | (6 | ) | 43 | |||||||||||||||||
Demand and money market deposits
|
77 | (209 | ) | (132 | ) | 464 | (840 | ) | (376 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Time deposits
|
42 | (516 | ) | (474 | ) | 746 | (1,527 | ) | (781 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Borrowings
|
(57 | ) | 31 | (26 | ) | 41 | 53 | 94 | ||||||||||||||||
169 | (692 | ) | (523 | ) | 1,300 | (2,320 | ) | (1,020 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net direct finance, loan and interest income
|
$ | (314 | ) | $ | (100 | ) | $ | (414 | ) | $ | 1,618 | $ | (1,787 | ) | $ | (169 | ) |
The following tables present the Company’s average balance sheets, direct finance and loan income and interest earned or interest paid, the related yields and rates on major categories of the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Yields/rates are presented on an annualized basis.
Quarter ended
|
Quarter ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
March 31, 2010
|
March 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Yield/
|
Average
|
Yield/
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning deposits with banks
|
$ | 77,106 | $ | 33 | 0.2 | % | $ | 42,931 | $ | 85 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold
|
- | - | 0.0 | % | 11,183 | 7 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities
|
77,264 | 1,033 | 5.3 | % | 74,194 | 1,300 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
64,502 | 1,099 | 6.8 | % | 64,418 | 929 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net investment in leases, including
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
discounted lease rentals (1,2)
|
219,138 | 4,648 | 8.5 | % | 226,278 | 5,429 | 9.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets
|
438,010 | 6,813 | 6.2 | % | 419,004 | 7,750 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets
|
14,792 | 27,711 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 452,802 | $ | 446,715 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand and savings deposits
|
$ | 66,891 | 191 | 1.1 | % | $ | 54,051 | 323 | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Time deposits
|
143,501 | 851 | 2.4 | % | 139,135 | 1,326 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB & FRB borrowings
|
10,000 | 52 | 2.1 | % | 37,944 | 77 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse debt
|
16,605 | 228 | 5.5 | % | 8,711 | 119 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
236,997 | 1,322 | 2.2 | % | 239,841 | 1,845 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
21,178 | 19,215 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders' equity
|
194,627 | 187,659 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 452,802 | $ | 446,715 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net direct finance, loan and interest income
|
$ | 5,491 | $ | 5,905 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net direct finance, loan and interest income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
to average interest-earning assets
|
5.0 | % | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets over
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
average interest-bearing liabilities
|
184.8 | % | 174.7 | % |
16
Nine months ended
|
Nine months ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2010
|
March 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Yield/
|
Average
|
Yield/
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning deposits with banks
|
$ | 68,178 | $ | 96 | 0.2 | % | $ | 37,680 | $ | 447 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold
|
1,200 | - | 0.0 | % | 16,742 | 179 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities
|
97,397 | 3,644 | 5.0 | % | 42,903 | 2,343 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
69,724 | 3,067 | 5.9 | % | 54,938 | 2,821 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net investment in leases, including
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
discounted lease rentals (1,2)
|
212,756 | 14,366 | 9.0 | % | 225,749 | 16,571 | 9.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets
|
449,255 | 21,173 | 6.3 | % | 378,012 | 22,361 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets
|
23,815 | 33,265 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 473,070 | $ | 411,277 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand and savings deposits
|
$ | 70,017 | 662 | 1.3 | % | $ | 48,386 | 1,037 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Time deposits
|
150,281 | 3,067 | 2.7 | % | 125,880 | 3,848 | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB & FRB borrowings
|
24,178 | 193 | 1.1 | % | 17,122 | 100 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse debt
|
10,637 | 431 | 5.4 | % | 9,433 | 387 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
255,113 | 4,353 | 2.3 | % | 200,821 | 5,372 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
23,217 | 20,388 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders' equity
|
194,740 | 190,068 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 473,070 | $ | 411,277 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net direct finance, loan and interest income
|
$ | 16,820 | $ | 16,989 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net direct finance, loan and interest income
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
to average interest-earning assets
|
5.0 | % | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets over
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
average interest-bearing liabilities
|
176.1 | % | 188.2 |
%
|
(1)
|
Direct finance income and interest expense on discounted lease rentals and non-recourse debt of $10.6 million and $9.4 million at March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, offset each other and do not contribute to the Company’s net direct finance, loan and interest income.
|
(2)
|
Average balance is based on month-end balances, and includes non-accrual leases, and is presented net of unearned income.
|
Provision for Credit Losses -- The Company did not record a provision for credit losses in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, compared to a provision of $300,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. For the nine-month period ended March 31, 2010, the provision was $350,000 compared to a provision of $1.2 million for the same period of the prior fiscal year. A 5% decline in the combined lease and loan portfolio during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 reduced the need to add to the provision for credit losses, while the provision for credit losses for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 reflected a 10% decline in the combined portfolios that was offset by heightened credit risk within the commercial loan portfolio.
Non-interest Income -- Total non-interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 increased by $194,000, or 13.9%, to $1.6 million, compared to $1.4 million for the same quarter of the prior fiscal year. The improvement primarily relates to the impact of a charge taken of $869,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 for the other-than-temporary impairment of two closed-end fund investments. Excluding that charge, other income during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 declined by 30% as operating and sales-type income declined $667,000 to $373,000 and gains on sales of leases and leased property declined $94,000 to $1.0 million.
For the nine months ended March 31, 2010, total non-interest income of $7.0 million increased 32.9% from $5.3 million reported for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The increase was due to a $3.4 million of gains realized on the sale of investment securities, which gain was compounded by the impairment charge taken in fiscal 2009. Excluding income related to investments, other income for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 declined by $2.6 million, primarily due to a $1.7 million decrease in income realized on leases reaching their end of term during the period, and a $1.0 million decline in income from the sale of leases.
17
Non-interest Expense – During the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010, non-interest expense of $2.9 million and $8.7 million declined by 9.8% and 16.0%, respectively. During both periods, the decrease primarily is due to lower employee compensation and benefit related expenses, and partially relates to lower general overhead costs.
Taxes – Income taxes were accrued at a tax rate of 38.25% for the first quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2010, compared to 37.5% for the first quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2009, and represent the estimated annual tax rate for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in rate was primarily due to a decline in the amount of leases where income was exempt from Federal income tax.
Financial Condition Analysis
Consolidated total assets at March 31, 2010 of $447.6 million were down 8.5% from $489.0 million at June 30, 2009. The change in total assets includes a $42.4 million decrease in investment securities to $77.2 million, a $15.0 million decrease in the net investment in leases to $198.6 million and a $13.1 million decrease in commercial loans to $58.0 million. Offsetting these decreases was a $26.3 million increase in cash and cash equivalents to $81.5 million.
Lease and Loan Portfolio Analysis
The Company’s strategy is to develop lease and loan portfolios with risk/reward profiles that meet its objectives. The Company currently funds most new lease transactions internally, with a portion of lease receivables assigned to other financial institutions. During the first nine months ended March 31, 2010, approximately 83% of the total dollar amount of new leases booked by the Company were held in its own portfolios, compared to 85% during the first nine months of fiscal 2009. The $15.0 million decline in the Company’s net investment in leases includes an $18.2 million decrease in the investment in lease receivables offset by an increase of $3.1 million increase in the estimated residual values. The decrease in lease receivables is due to a lower volume of new leases booked and retained in the Company’s portfolio during the period. The increased investment in residual values is due to a larger volume of leases booked during the period in which the Company retained a residual investment. The Company’s commercial loan portfolio decreased $13.1 million to $58.0 million due to the early payoff of certain loans that more than offset the $9.2 million of new loans boarded.
The Company often makes payments to purchase leased property prior to the commencement of the lease. The disbursements for these lease transactions in process are generally made to facilitate the lessees’ property implementation schedule. The lessee is contractually obligated by the lease to make rental payments directly to the Company during the period that the transaction is in process, and the lessee generally is obligated to reimburse the Company for all disbursements under certain circumstances. Income is not recognized while a transaction is in process and prior to the commencement of the lease. At March 31, 2010, the Company’s investment in property acquired for transactions in process of $10.5 million related to approximately $64.9 million of approved lease commitments. This investment in transactions in process decreased $1.9 million from $12.4 million at June 30, 2009, which related to approved lease commitments of $79.9 million, and was down from $1.8 million at March 31 2009, which related to approved lease commitments of $46.1 million. In addition to the approved lease commitments, CalFirst Bank had unfunded commercial and equipment finance loan commitments at March 31, 2010 of $21.2 million.
The Company monitors the performance of all leases and loans held in its own portfolio, transactions in process, as well as lease transactions assigned to lenders, if the Company retains a residual investment in the leased property subject to those leases. An ongoing review of all leases and loans ten or more day’s delinquent is conducted. Lessees and loans that are delinquent with the Company or an assignee are coded in the Company’s accounting and tracking systems in order to provide management visibility, periodic reporting, and appropriate reserves. The accrual of interest income on leases and loans generally will be discontinued when the lease or loan becomes ninety days or more past due on its payments with the Company, unless the Company believes the investment is otherwise recoverable. Leases and loans may be placed on non-accrual earlier if the Company has significant doubts about the ability of the customer to meet its obligations, as evidenced by consistent delinquency, deterioration in the customer’s financial condition or other relevant factors.
18
The following table summarizes the Company’s non-performing leases and loans:
March 31, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||
Non-performing Leases and Loans
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||
Non-accrual leases
|
$ | 1,944 | $ | 1,399 | ||||
Restructured leases and loans
|
8,098 | 8,437 | ||||||
Leases past due 90 days (other than above)
|
- | 293 | ||||||
Total non-performing leases and loans
|
$ | 10,042 | $ | 10,129 | ||||
Non-performing assets as % of net investment
|
||||||||
in leases and loans before allowances
|
3.8 | % | 3.5 | % |
The increase in non-accrual leases at March 31, 2010 from June 30, 2009 primarily reflects the addition of problem leases that offset the receipt of payments on other problem accounts. The restructured lease and loan balance for both periods includes a loan and lease with one customer with an aggregate balance of approximately $8.1 million. This relationship was current with its restructured payments at March 31, 2010 and the transactions remain on an accrual basis. In addition to the non-performing leases and loans identified above, there was $8.4 million of leases and loans at March 31, 2010 classified as substandard or with credits that currently are experiencing financial difficulties or that management believes may experience financial difficulties in the future. Although these credits have been classified and identified as potential problems, they may never become non-performing. These potential problem leases and loans are considered in the determination of the allowance for credit losses.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses provides coverage for probable and estimatable losses in the Company’s lease and loan portfolios. The allowance recorded is based on a quarterly review of all leases and loans outstanding and transactions in process. Lease receivables, loans or residuals are charged off when they are deemed completely uncollectible. The determination of the appropriate amount of any provision is based on management’s judgment at that time and takes into consideration all known relevant internal and external factors that may affect the portfolios.
Nine months ended
|
||||||||
March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||
Property acquired for transactions in process before allowance
|
$ | 10,716 | $ | 12,467 | ||||
Net investment in leases and loans before allowance
|
261,479 | 290,946 | ||||||
Net investment in “risk assets”
|
$ | 272,195 | $ | 303,413 | ||||
Allowance for credit losses at beginning of period
|
$ | 4,830 | $ | 3,921 | ||||
Charge-off of lease receivables
|
(74 | ) | (480 | ) | ||||
Recovery of amounts previously written off
|
44 | 13 | ||||||
Provision for credit losses
|
350 | 1,175 | ||||||
Allowance for credit losses at end of period
|
$ | 5,150 | $ | 4,629 | ||||
Components of allowance for credit losses:
|
||||||||
Allowance for lease losses
|
$ | 3,365 | $ | 3,344 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses
|
1,522 | 1,072 | ||||||
Liability for unfunded loan commitments
|
20 | 20 | ||||||
Allowance for transactions in process
|
243 | 193 | ||||||
$ | 5,150 | $ | 4,629 | |||||
Allowance for credit losses as a percent of net investment
|
||||||||
in leases and loans before allowances
|
2.0 | % | 1.6 | % | ||||
Allowance for credit losses as a percent of net investment in “risk assets”
|
1.9 | % | 1.5 | % |
The allowance for credit losses increased $320,000 to $5.2 million (2.0% of net investment in leases and loans before allowances) at March 31, 2010 from $4.8 million (1.6% of net investment in leases and loans before allowances) at June 30, 2009. This allowance consisted of $2.4 million allocated to specific accounts that were identified as problems and $2.8 million that was available to cover losses inherent in the portfolio. This compared to $1.9 million allocated to specific accounts at June 30, 2009 and $3.0 million available for losses inherent in the portfolio at that time. The Company considers the allowance for credit losses of $5.2 million at March 31, 2010 adequate to cover losses specifically identified as well as inherent in the lease and loan portfolios. However, no assurance can be given that the Company will not, in any particular period, sustain lease and loan losses that are sizeable in relation to the amount reserved, or that subsequent evaluations of the lease and loan portfolio, in light of factors then prevailing, including economic conditions and the on-going credit review process, will not require significant increases in the allowance for credit losses. Among other factors, economic and political events may have an adverse impact on the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses by increasing credit risk and the risk of potential loss even further.
19
Investment Securities
Total investment securities, both available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, were $77.2 million as of March 31, 2010, down from $119.6 million at June 30, 2009. At March 31, 2010, the securities portfolio included an unrealized pre-tax gain of $4.0 million compared to a $2.2 million unrealized pre-tax gain at June 30, 2009. During the nine months ended March 31, 2010, the Company realized a net gain of $3.4 million on the sale of trust-preferred securities, U.S. agency collateralized mortgage obligations, a corporate bond and an equity security held in the Company’s portfolio. During the same period, the Company purchased $21.1 million of corporate bonds and $600,000 of Federal Reserve Bank Stock.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company funds its operating activities through internally generated funds, bank deposits and non-recourse debt. At March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were $81.5 million and $55.2 million, respectively. Stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2010 was $196.2 million, or 44% of total assets, compared to $191.4 million, or 39% of total assets, at June 30, 2009. At March 31, 2010, the Company and the Bank exceed their regulatory capital requirements and are considered “well-capitalized” under guidelines established by the FRB and OCC.
Deposits at CalFirst Bank totaled $204.8 million at March 31, 2010, compared to $205.5 million at March 31, 2009 and $220.9 million at June 30, 2009. The decrease in deposits over the past year was in response to the decline in leases, loans and the Bank’s investment portfolio. The following table presents average balances and average rates paid on deposits for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Nine months ended March 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Average
|
Average
|
Average
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||
Balance
|
Rate Paid
|
Balance
|
Rate Paid
|
|||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits
|
$ | 1,587 | n/a | $ | 1,666 | N/a | ||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
113 | 0.50 | % | 218 | 0.50 | % | ||||||||||
Money market deposits
|
69,904 | 1.26 | % | 48,168 | 2.87 | % | ||||||||||
Time deposits less than $100,000
|
67,401 | 2.78 | % | 61,136 | 4.03 | % | ||||||||||
Time deposits, $100,000 or more
|
$ | 82,880 | 2.67 | % | $ | 64,744 | 4.11 | % |
The following table shows the maturities of certificates of deposits at the dates indicated:
March 31, 2010
|
||||||||
Less Than
|
Greater Than
|
|||||||
$100,000 | $100,000 | |||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
Under 3 months
|
$ | 13,283 | $ | 16,829 | ||||
3 - 6 months
|
9,733 | 17,595 | ||||||
6 - 12 months
|
21,099 | 32,155 | ||||||
Over 12 months
|
12,714 | 15,435 | ||||||
$ | 56,829 | $ | 82,014 |
At March 31, 2010, the Bank had an outstanding balance of $10.0 million under a long-term borrowing agreement with the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco that matures in January 2012 and is collateralized by a pledge of certain investment securities of the Bank, with $2.0 million still available under this agreement. The Bank also may borrow from the Federal Reserve Discount Window amounts secured by certain lease receivables. The Bank had no borrowings under this agreement at March 31, 2010, with the total availability estimated to be approximately $58 million. The Bank may elect from time-to-time to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank rather than the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco to maintain an immediate secondary source of liquidity.
20
CalFirst Leasing’s capital expenditures for leased property purchases are sometimes financed by assigning certain lease term payments to banks or other financial institutions, including CalFirst Bank. The assigned lease payments are discounted at fixed rates such that the lease payments are sufficient to fully amortize the aggregate outstanding debt. At March 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding non-recourse debt aggregating $16.2 million relating to discounted lease rentals assigned to unaffiliated lenders. In the past, the Company has been able to obtain adequate non-recourse funding commitments, and the Company believes it will be able to do so in the future.
As of March 31, 2010, CalFirst Leasing had a $15 million line of credit with a bank. The purpose of the line is to provide resources as needed for investment in transactions in process and leases. The agreement, as amended, provides for borrowings based on Libor, requires a commitment fee on the unused line balance and allows for advances through March 31, 2011. The agreement is unsecured, however, the Company guarantees CalFirst Leasing’s obligations. No borrowings have been made under this line of credit as of March 31, 2010.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table summarizes various contractual obligations as of March 31, 2010. Commitments to purchase property for leases are binding and generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Commercial loan commitments are agreements to lend to a customer or purchase a participation provided there is no violation of any condition in the contract. These commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since the Company expects some of the commitments to expire without being funded, the total amounts do not necessarily represent the Company’s future liquidity requirements.
Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||
Less Than
|
After
|
|||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations
|
Total
|
1 Year
|
1-5 Years
|
5 Years
|
||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Commercial and equipment finance loan commitments
|
$ | 21,205 | $ | 21,205 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Lease property purchases (1)
|
51,938 | 51,938 | - | - | ||||||||||||
FHLB Borrowings
|
10,000 | - | 10,000 | - | ||||||||||||
Operating lease rental expense
|
3,761 | 783 | 2,978 | - | ||||||||||||
Total contractual commitments
|
$ | 86,904 | $ | 73,926 | $ | 12,978 | $ | - | ||||||||
(1)
|
Disbursements to purchase property on approved leases are estimated to be completed within one year, but it is likely that some portion could be deferred to later periods.
|
The need for cash for operating activities will increase as the Company expands. The Company believes that existing cash balances, cash flow from operations, cash flows from its financing and investing activities, and assignments (on a non-recourse basis) of lease payments will be sufficient to meet its foreseeable financing needs.
Inflation has not had a significant impact upon the operations of the Company.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk of loss of value in a financial instrument arising from changes in market indices such as interest rates, credit spreads and securities prices. The Company’s principal market risk exposure is interest rate risk, which is the exposure due to differences in the repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Market risk also arises from the impact that fluctuations in interest rates may have on security prices that may result in changes in the values of financial instruments, such as available-for-sale securities that are accounted for at fair value. As the banking operations of the Company have grown and CalFirst Bank’s deposits represent a greater portion of the Company’s liabilities, the Company is subject to increased interest rate risk. The Bank has an Asset/Liability Management Committee and policies established to manage its interest rate risk. CalFirst Leasing has no interest-bearing debt, and non-recourse debt does not represent an interest rate risk to the Company because it is fully amortized through direct payments from lessees to the purchaser of the lease receivable.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had $81.5 million of cash or invested in securities of very short duration. The Company’s investment in lease payments receivable and commercial loans of $256.6 million consists of leases with fixed rates and loans with variable rates, however, $153.8 million of such investment is due within one year of March 31, 2010. Of the $77.2 million investment in securities, $17.3 million mature within twelve months. This compares to interest bearing deposit liabilities and FHLB and FRB borrowings of $214.8 million, of which $175.6 million mature within one year. Based on the foregoing, at March 31, 2010 the Company had assets of $252.6 million subject to changes in interest rates over the next twelve months, compared to repricing liabilities of $175.8 million.
21
The consolidated gap analysis below sets forth the maturity and repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for selected time bands. The mismatch between repricings or maturities within a time band is commonly referred to as the “gap” for that period. A positive gap (asset sensitive), where interest rate sensitive assets exceed interest rate sensitive liabilities, generally will result in the net interest margin increasing in a rising rate environment and decreasing in a falling rate environment. A negative gap (liability sensitive) will generally have the opposite result on the net interest margin. The gap analysis at March 31, 2010 presented below indicates that net interest income should increase during periods of rising interest rates and decrease during periods of falling interest rates. However, the static gap analysis does not assess the relative sensitivity of assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates and other factors that could have an impact on interest rate sensitivity or net interest income, including the protection provided by interest rate floors incorporated into a number of commercial loans. Sudden and substantial changes in interest rates may adversely impact income to the extent that the interest rates associated with the assets and liabilities do not change at the same speed, to the same extent, or on the same basis.
Consolidated Interest Rate Sensitivity
Over 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 Months
|
Over 3 to
|
Through
|
Over
|
Non-rate
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
or Less
|
12 Months
|
5 years
|
5 years
|
Sensitive
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Rate Sensitive Assets (RSA):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash due from banks
|
$ | 81,512 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 81,512 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities
|
8,285 | 8,966 | 50,225 | 9,707 | - | 77,183 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment in leases
|
20,663 | 81,454 | 121,173 | - | (24,709 | ) | 198,581 | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans
|
51,683 | - | 9,567 | - | (3,239 | ) | 58,011 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest earning assets
|
- | - | - | - | 32,277 | 32,277 | ||||||||||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 162,143 | $ | 90,420 | $ | 180,965 | $ | 9,707 | $ | 4,329 | $ | 447,564 | ||||||||||||
Cumulative total for RSA
|
$ | 162,143 | $ | 252,563 | $ | 433,528 | $ | 443,235 | ||||||||||||||||
Rate Sensitive Liabilities (RSL):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand and savings deposits
|
$ | 65,092 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 913 | $ | 66,005 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits
|
30,112 | 80,582 | 28,149 | - | - | 138,843 | ||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings
|
- | - | 10,000 | - | - | 10,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing liabilities
|
- | - | - | - | 36,483 | 36,483 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders' equity
|
- | - | - | - | 196,233 | 196,233 | ||||||||||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 95,204 | $ | 80,582 | $ | 38,149 | $ | - | $ | 233,629 | $ | 447,564 | ||||||||||||
Cumulative total for RSL
|
$ | 95,204 | $ | 175,786 | $ | 213,935 | $ | 213,935 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate sensitivity gap
|
$ | 66,939 | $ | 9,838 | $ | 142,816 | $ | 9,707 | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulative GAP
|
$ | 66,939 | $ | 76,777 | $ | 219,593 | $ | 229,300 | ||||||||||||||||
RSA divided by RSL (cumulative)
|
170.31 | % | 143.68 | % | 202.64 | % | 207.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulative GAP / total assets
|
14.96 | % | 17.15 | % | 49.06 | % | 51.23 | % |
In addition to the consolidated gap analysis, CalFirst Bank measures its interest rate sensitivity through a maturity gap analysis and income simulation models. The interest rate sensitivity modeling includes the creation of prospective twelve month "baseline" and "rate shocked" net interest income projections and requires CalFirst Bank to estimate the impact of various factors on net interest income using assumptions that the Bank deems reasonable. These factors include actual maturities, estimated cash flows, repricing characteristics, deposit growth and retention and the relative sensitivity of the Bank’s assets and liabilities to changes in market interest rates. As of March 31, 2010, CalFirst Bank’s analysis estimated that the Bank’s projected net interest income would increase by approximately 3% from the base case scenario over the next 12 months if interest rates were to sustain an immediate increase of 100 basis points, and would increase by an estimated 11% to 18% with a 200 to 300 basis point rise in rates over 12 months. Assuming a 100 basis point decline in rates, the model estimated an approximate 3% decrease in net interest income from an unchanged rate environment. The likelihood of a decrease in interest rates beyond 100 basis points as of March 31, 2010 was considered to be remote given current interest rate levels.
22
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's management, including its principal executive officer and its principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2010 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. There were no changes made during the most recent fiscal quarter to the Company's internal controls over financial reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table summarizes share repurchase activity for the quarter ended March 31, 2010:
Maximum Number
|
||||||||||||
Total number
|
Of shares that may
|
|||||||||||
of shares
|
Average price
|
yet be purchased
|
||||||||||
Period
|
Purchased
|
paid per share
|
under the plan (1)
|
|||||||||
January 1, 2010 - January 31, 2010
|
- | $ | - | 368,354 | ||||||||
February 1, 2010 - February 28, 2010
|
- | $ | - | 368,354 | ||||||||
March 1, 2010- March 31, 2010
|
- | $ | - | 368,354 | ||||||||
- | $ | - | ||||||||||
1)
|
In April 2001, the Board of Directors authorized management, at its discretion, to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock. |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a)
|
Exhibits
|
Page
|
||
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Executive Officer
|
25
|
||
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Financial Officer
|
26
|
||
32.1
|
Section 1350 Certifications by Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
|
27
|
23
CALIFORNIA FIRST NATIONAL BANCORP
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
California First National Bancorp |
|||||
Registrant | |||||
DATE:
|
May 13, 2010 | BY: |
/s/ S. Leslie Jewett
|
||
S. LESLIE JEWETT | |||||
Chief Financial Officer | |||||
(Principal Financial and | |||||
Accounting Officer) |
24