Annual Statements Open main menu

Cannae Holdings, Inc. - Annual Report: 2019 (Form 10-K)

 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2019
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  Commission File No. 1-38300
 _________________________________
 CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
 
 
82-1273460
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 
 
1701 Village Center Circle,
Las Vegas,
Nevada
89134
(Address of principal executive offices)
(zip code)
(702) 323-7330
_____________________________________
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Trading Symbol
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Cannae Common Stock, $0.0001 par value
CNNE
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes     No 
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes      No 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes       No  
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  Yes     No 
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
     Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes      No 
 
The aggregate market value of the shares of Cannae Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 28, 2019, was $1,941,307,497 based on the closing price of $28.98 as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.
As of January 31, 2020 there were 79,516,833 shares of Cannae common stock outstanding.
The information in Part III hereof for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, will be filed within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year that is the subject of this Report.
 
 
 
 
 



CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
Page
Number
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


i


PART I

Item 1.
Business 
Introductory Note
The following describes the business of Cannae Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Except where otherwise noted, all references to “we,” “us,” “our,” "Cannae", "Cannae Holdings", or the "Company," are to Cannae Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, taken together.
Company Background
On November 17, 2017, Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (“FNF”) redeemed each outstanding share of its FNF Ventures ("FNFV") Group common stock, par value $0.0001, for one share of common stock, par value $0.0001, of a newly formed entity, Cannae (the "Split-Off"). In conjunction with the Split-Off, FNF contributed to us its portfolio of investments unrelated to its primary insurance and real estate operations which included majority and minority equity investment stakes in a number of entities and certain fixed income investments. On November 20, 2017, Cannae common stock began “regular-way” trading on The New York Stock Exchange under the “CNNE” stock symbol.
Description of Business
We are a holding company engaged in actively managing and operating a group of companies and investments, as well as making additional majority and minority equity portfolio investments in businesses, in order to achieve superior financial performance and maximize the value of these assets. Our primary investments as of December 31, 2019 include our minority ownership interests in The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation ("Dun & Bradstreet" or "D&B"), Ceridian HCM Holding, Inc. ("Ceridian") and Coding Solutions Topco, Inc. ("Coding Solutions", the joint venture that now owns T-System Holdings, Inc.); majority equity ownership stakes in O'Charley's, LLC ("O'Charley's) and 99 Restaurants Holdings, LLC ("99 Restaurants"); and various other equity and debt investments primarily in the real estate, financial services and healthcare technology industries.
The Company conducts its business through our wholly-owned subsidiary Cannae Holdings, LLC ("Cannae LLC"), a Delaware limited liability company. The Company’s board of directors ("Board") oversees the management of the Company, Cannae LLC and its businesses, and the performance of Trasimene Capital Management, LLC (“Trasimene” or our “Manager”). As previously disclosed, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, the Company transitioned to an externally managed structure (such externalization of certain management functions, the “Externalization”). In connection with the Externalization, the Company, Cannae LLC, and our Manager entered into a Management Services Agreement (the “Management Services Agreement”). See further discussion under the header Externalization in Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this "Annual Report") for further discussion of our Manager and current year change in management structure.
As of December 31, 2019, we had the following reportable segments:
Dun & Bradstreet. This segment consists of our 24.3% ownership interest in the parent of D&B. On February 8, 2019, Cannae and a consortium of other investors (the "D&B Investors") completed the previously announced acquisition of Dun & Bradstreet's ultimate parent (the "D&B Acquisition").
Dun & Bradstreet is a leading global provider of business decisioning data and analytics. Its mission is to deliver a global network of trust, enabling clients to transform uncertainty into confidence, risk into opportunity and potential into prosperity. Clients embed D&B's trusted, end-to-end solutions into their daily workflows to enhance salesforce productivity, gain visibility into key markets, inform commercial credit decisions and confirm that suppliers are financially viable and compliant with laws and regulations. Dun & Bradstreet's solutions support its clients’ mission critical business operations by providing proprietary and curated data and analytics to help drive informed decisions and improved outcomes.
Dun & Bradstreet is differentiated by the scale, depth, diversity and accuracy of its constantly expanding business database that contains comprehensive information on more than 355 million total businesses as of December 31, 2019. Access to longitudinal curated data is critical for global commerce, and with only a small percentage of the world’s businesses filing public financial statements, D&B data is a trusted source for reliable information about both public and private businesses. By building such a set of data over time, D&B was able to establish a unique identifier that creates a single thread connecting related corporate entities allowing its clients to form a holistic view of an enterprise. This unique identifier, which D&B refers to as the D-U-N-S Number, is a corporate ‘‘fingerprint’’ or ‘‘Social Security Number’’ of businesses. Dun & Bradstreet believes that it is the only scale provider to possess both worldwide commercial credit data and comprehensive public records data that are linked together by a unique identifier allowing for an accurate assessment of public and private businesses globally.
We account for our investment in Dun & Bradstreet using the equity method of accounting; therefore, its results of operations do not consolidate into ours.

1


Ceridian.  This segment consists of our 16.4% ownership interest in Ceridian. Ceridian is a global human capital management (“HCM”) software company. Dayforce, Ceridian's flagship cloud HCM platform, provides human resources (“HR”), payroll, benefits, workforce management, and talent management functionality. Dayforce is a single application that provides continuous real-time calculations across all modules to enable, for example, payroll administrators access to data through the entire pay period, and managers access to real-time data to optimize work schedules. Dayforce offers a comprehensive range of functionality, including global HR, payroll, benefits, workforce management, and talent management on web and native iOS and Android platforms. Ceridian's Dayforce mobile app enables employees not only to request and to trade schedules, but also to see the real-time impact of schedule changes on their pay. The Dayforce platform is used by organizations, regardless of industry or size, to optimize management of the entire employee lifecycle, including attracting, engaging, paying, deploying, and developing their people. In addition to Dayforce, Ceridian sells Powerpay, a cloud HR and payroll solution for the Canadian small business market, through both direct sales and established partner channels. Ceridian also continues to support customers using its Bureau solutions, which it generally stopped actively selling to new customers in 2012, following the acquisition of Dayforce. Ceridian invests in maintenance and necessary updates to support its Bureau customers and continues to migrate them to Dayforce.
We account for our investment in Ceridian using the equity method of accounting; therefore, its results of operations do not consolidate into ours.
Restaurant Group.  This segment consists of the operations of O'Charley's, 99 Restaurants and American Blue Ribbon Holdings, LLC ("Blue Ribbon"), in which we have 65.4%, 88.5% and 65.4% ownership interests, respectively. O'Charley's and its affiliates are the owners and operators of the O'Charley's restaurant concept. 99 Restaurants and its affiliates are the owners and operators of the Ninety Nine Restaurants restaurant concept. Blue Ribbon and its affiliates are the owners and operators of the Village Inn and Bakers Square food service and restaurant concepts, as well as the Legendary Baking bakery operation.
In January 2020, we began a restructuring of Blue Ribbon in order to effectuate a restructuring of the Village Inn and Bakers Square brands, including by closing certain stores just prior to the filing of voluntary chapter 11 petitions for Blue Ribbon and its subsidiaries. The filing of voluntary chapter 11 petitions does not impact O' Charley's or 99 Restaurants, which are not part of Blue Ribbon. Refer to discussion under the header Recent Developments in Item 7 of Part II and under Blue Ribbon Reorganization in Note M to the financial statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further information, which are incorporated by reference into this Part I, Item 1.
Corporate and Other.  This aggregation of nonreportable segment consists of our share in the operations of controlled and uncontrolled portfolio companies including our 22.7% interest in Coding Solutions, 49.0% interest in an investment fund (the "Equity Fund"), 24.8% equity interest in Triple Tree Holdings, LLC ("Triple Tree"), majority owned real estate and resort development businesses ("Cannae RE"), 18.8% voting equity interest in preferred stock of QOMPLX, Inc. ("QOMPLX") and other various majority and minority equity and debt investments.
Coding Solutions is a joint venture between Cannae, affiliates of The Carlyle Group and others which has various medical coding technology platforms and back office functions supporting the health care revenue and billing cycles and intends to focus on acquiring and operating synergistic health care services companies in the provider and payer space. See further discussion of our current year contribution of T-System Holdings, Inc. to Coding Solutions in exchange for cash and equity interests in Coding Solutions.
The Equity Fund is an investment fund designed to opportunistically trade in marketable securities.
Triple Tree is an independent, research-driven investment banking firm focused on mergers and acquisitions, financial restructuring, and principal investing services for innovative, high-growth businesses in the healthcare industry.
Cannae RE and its subsidiaries currently operate and invest in golf and real estate properties and develop, manage and operate residential and recreational properties, including a 1,800-acre ranch-style luxury resort and residential community in Oregon and an 18-hole championship golf facility in Idaho.
QOMPLX, formerly Fractal Industries, Inc., is an intelligent decision and analytics platform used by businesses for modeling and planning.
Refer to discussion under Recent Developments in Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report for further information on recent transactions, changes in our management structure, and other activity of our operating segments.
Strategy
Our strategy for the Company is to continue our activities with respect to the above described business investments to achieve superior financial performance, maximize and ultimately monetize the value of those assets and to continue to pursue similar investments in businesses and to grow and achieve superior financial performance with respect to such newly acquired businesses.
Dun & Bradstreet. We believe that Dun & Bradstreet has an attractive business model that is underpinned by highly recurring, diversified revenues, significant operating leverage, low capital requirements and strong free cash flow. The proprietary and

2


embedded nature of its data and analytics solutions and the integral role that D&B plays in its clients’ decision-making processes have translated into high client retention and revenue visibility. For example, 16 of D&B's top 20 clients by revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019, have had an average tenure with D&B of over 20 years. Dun & Bradstreet also benefits from strong operating leverage given its centralized database and solutions, which allows it to generate strong contribution margins and free cash flow.
Subsequent to the D&B Acquisition, D&B quickly began implementing changes to address operational and execution issues at D&B which led to stagnant revenue growth and declining profitability over the last decade. The D&B Investors immediately brought in a new senior leadership team which commenced a comprehensive transformation to improve and revitalize D&B's business for long-term success. The new senior leadership team saw significant opportunity to create value by transforming the organization and improving the platform with new business unit leaders, enhanced technology and data, solution innovation and a client-centric go-to-market strategy.
D&B's transformation strategy, which is well underway, is based on a proven playbook of enhancing stockholder value through organizational re-alignment and re-investment. As of December 31, 2019, these initiatives have resulted in approximately $208.0 million of net annualized run-rate savings, and D&B believes there are incremental opportunities to further rationalize its cost structure. In light of the changes that have been made or identified by the D&B Investors and D&B's seasoned management team, we believe D&B is well-positioned to execute on its near- and long-term strategies of driving stockholder value through consistent revenue growth, managing cost initiatives and innovating and improving the way it adds value and solves the increasingly challenging and complex needs of its clients.
Ceridian. Since 2016, Ceridian's business has transformed from a legacy service-bureau model into a cloud-based provider model. Ceridian's flagship cloud offering, Dayforce, is a cloud solution that meets HCM needs with one employee record and one user experience throughout the application. As evidenced by its more than 60% compound annual growth rate since 2012, we believe that the Dayforce cloud offering, built on a single database, enjoys a competitive advantage in the marketplace and is a market leader as shown by both extensive recognition and industry awards. Nucleus Research named Dayforce as the leader in both HCM technology and workforce management, based on functionality and usability. In addition, Gartner Peer Insights placed Ceridian's Dayforce offering in the leader quadrant in global payroll services, and Ventana Research found Dayforce as the leader in both usability and capability in its Value Index.
Restaurant Group. Our restaurant operations are focused in the family dining and casual dining segments of the restaurant industry. The Restaurant Group's strategy is to achieve long-term profit growth and drive increases in same store sales and guest counts. We have a highly experienced management team that is focused on enhancing the guest experience at our restaurants and building team member engagement. We also utilize a shared service platform that takes advantage of the combined back-office synergies of our restaurant operating companies. Our goal is to maintain a strong balance sheet for our Restaurant Group to provide stability in all operating environments.
We believe the Blue Ribbon Reorganization will facilitate Blue Ribbon’s Village Inn and Bakers Square restaurant brands' evolution to a healthy core of restaurants and support an approach to the brands that is most beneficial for all stakeholders.
Acquisitions, Dispositions, Minority Owned Operating Affiliates and Financings. Acquisitions are an important part of our growth strategy and dispositions are an important aspect of our strategy of returning value to shareholders. On an ongoing basis, with assistance from our advisors, we actively evaluate possible transactions, such as acquisitions and dispositions of business units and operating assets and business combination transactions.
In the future, we may seek to sell certain investments or other assets to increase our liquidity. Further, our management has stated that we may make acquisitions in lines of business that are not directly tied to, or synergistic with, our current operating segments. In the past we have obtained majority and minority investments in entities and securities where we see the potential to achieve above market returns. Fundamentally our goal is to acquire quality companies that are well-positioned in their respective industries, run by best-in-class management teams in industries that have attractive organic and acquired growth opportunities. We leverage our operational expertise and track record of growing industry leading companies and our active interaction with management of acquired companies, directly or through our board of directors, to ultimately provide value for our shareholders.
There can be no assurance that any suitable opportunities will arise or that any particular transaction will be completed. We have made a number of acquisitions and dispositions over the past several years to strengthen and expand our service offerings and customer base in our various businesses, to expand into other businesses or where we otherwise saw value, and to monetize investments in assets and businesses.
Through the date of this Annual Report, we have made significant progress both monetizing currently held investments and deploying capital toward new investments. Refer to discussion under Recent Developments in Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report for further information.


3


Intellectual Property
Dun & Bradstreet. D&B owns and controls various intellectual property rights, such as trade secrets, confidential information, trademarks, service marks, tradenames, copyrights, patents and applications to the foregoing. These rights, in the aggregate, are of material importance to Dun & Bradstreet's business. D&B believes that the Dun & Bradstreet name and related tradenames, marks and logos are also of material importance to its business. Dun & Bradstreet is licensed to use certain technology and other intellectual property rights owned and controlled by others, and other companies are licensed to use certain technology and other intellectual property rights owned and controlled by it. Dun & Bradstreet's trademarks, service marks, databases, software, copyrights, patents, patent applications and other intellectual property are proprietary and accordingly it relies on a combination of statutory (e.g., copyright, trademark, trade secret, patent, etc.) and contract and liability safeguards for protecting them throughout the world.
Dun & Bradstreet owns patents and patent applications both in the U.S. and in other selected countries. The patents and patent applications include claims which pertain to certain technologies and inventions which D&B has determined are proprietary and warrant patent protection. The protection of its innovative technology and inventions, such as its proprietary methods for data curation and identity resolution, through the filing of patent applications, is part of Dun & Bradstreet's business strategy. Filing of patent applications may or may not provide Dun & Bradstreet with a dominant position in the fields of technology. However, these patents and/or patent applications may provide Dun & Bradstreet with legal defenses should subsequent patents in these fields be issued to third-parties and later asserted against it. Where appropriate, Dun & Bradstreet may also consider asserting or cross-licensing its patents.
Ceridian. Ceridian's success depends, in part, on its ability to protect its proprietary technology and intellectual property. Ceridian relies on a combination of copyrights, trade secrets, and trademarks, as well as confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements and other contractual protections, to establish and to safeguard its intellectual property rights.
Restaurant Group. We regard our Restaurant Group's service marks, including "O'Charley's", "Ninety Nine", "Village Inn", "Legendary Baking", and "Bakers Square", and other service marks and trademarks as important factors in the marketing of our restaurants. We have also obtained trademarks for several of our brand's menu items and for various advertising slogans. We are aware of names and marks similar to our Restaurant Group's service marks and trademarks used by other persons in certain geographic areas where we have restaurants. However, we believe such uses will not adversely affect us. Our policy is to pursue registration of our marks whenever possible and to oppose vigorously any infringement of our marks.
We license the use of our registered trademarks and service marks to franchisees and third parties through franchise arrangements and licenses. The franchise and license arrangements restrict franchisees' and licensees' activities with respect to the use of our trademarks and service marks, and impose quality control standards in connection with goods and services offered in connection with the trademarks and service marks.
Seasonality
Ceridian. Ceridian has in the past and expects in the future to experience seasonal fluctuations in its revenues and new customer contracts with the fourth quarter historically being its strongest quarter for new customer contracts, renewals, and customer go-lives. Although the growth of Ceridian's cloud solutions and the ratable nature of its fees makes this seasonality less apparent in its overall results of operations, we expect Ceridian's revenue to fluctuate quarterly and to be higher in the fourth and first quarters of each year. Fourth quarter revenue is driven by year-end processing fees and Dayforce customer go-lives; and first quarter revenue is driven by revenue earned for printing of year-end tax packages.
Restaurant Group. Average weekly sales per restaurant are typically higher in the first and fourth quarters than in other quarters, and the Restaurant Group typically generates a disproportionate share of its earnings from operations in the first and fourth quarters. Holidays, severe weather and other disruptive conditions may impact sales volumes seasonally in some operating regions. Our revenues in future periods will continue to be subject to these and other factors that are beyond our control and, as a result, are likely to fluctuate.
Inventory 
Restaurant Group. In the restaurant group's Legendary Baking business, sales of baked goods are greatest during the holiday season in the fourth quarter. As a result of inventory requirements to meet this demand, inventory is built up over the course of the first nine months of the year.
Competition
Dun & Bradstreet. Dun & Bradstreet primarily competes on the basis of differentiated data sets, analytical capabilities, solutions, client relationships, innovation and price. D&B believes that is competes favorably in each of these categories across its business segments. D&B's competitors vary based on the client size and geographical market that its solutions cover.

4


For Dun & Bradstreet's finance and risk solutions segment, its competition generally varies by client size. D&B has a leading presence in the enterprise market as clients place a high degree of value on our best-in-class commercial credit database to inform their critical decisions around the extension of credit. D&B’s main competitors in the enterprise and mid-market include Bureau van Dijk (owned by Moody’s Corporation) in Europe and Equifax and Experian in North America. In the small and mid-size company market, commercial credit health becomes increasingly tied to consumer credit health. D&B's competition in this market generally includes Equifax, Experian and other consumer credit providers that offer commercial data. Additionally, there is a fragmented tail of low cost, vertical and regionally focused point solutions in this market that may be attractive to certain clients, but lack the scale and coverage breadth to compete holistically.
For Dun & Bradstreet's sales and marketing solutions segment, its competition has historically been very fragmented with many players offering varying levels of data quantity and quality, and with data being collected in ways that may cross ethical and privacy boundaries. Dun & Bradstreet strives to protect the data and privacy of its clients and to maintain the highest standards in the ethical acquisition, aggregation, curation and delivery of data. D&B's direct competitors vary depending on use cases, such as market segmentation, digital marketing lead generation, lead enrichment, sales effectiveness and data management. In the market for contact data, D&B's competition generally includes Bureau Van Dijk, ZoomInfo and a few consultancies building bespoke solutions. For other sales and marketing solutions such as customer data platform, visitor intelligence, audience targeting and intent data, D&B faces a number of smaller competitors such as Bombora.
Overall, outside North America, D&B's competitive environment varies by region and country, and can be significantly impacted by the legislative actions of local governments, availability of data and local business preferences. In the United Kingdom and Ireland, D&B's direct competition for its finance and risk solutions segment is primarily from Bureau van Dijk, Creditsafe and Experian. Additionally, in D&B's sales and marketing solutions segment, the landscape in these markets is both localized and fragmented, where numerous local players of varying sizes compete for business. In Asia Pacific, D&B faces competition in its finance and risk solutions segment from a mix of local and global providers. D&B competes with Experian in India and a subsidiary of Experian, Sinotrust International Information & Consulting (Beijing) Co., Ltd., in China. In addition, as in the United Kingdom, D&B's sales and marketing solutions landscape throughout Asia is localized and fragmented.
Ceridian. The market for HCM technology solutions is rapidly changing, with legacy service bureau and on-premise software providers facing increased competition from emerging cloud players. Ceridian currently competes with firms that provide both integrated and point solutions for HCM. Legacy payroll service providers, such as Automatic Data Processing, provide HCM solutions primarily through service bureau models. These vendors often have more in-house resources, greater name recognition, and longer operating histories than Dayforce and may seek to expand their cloud offerings through acquisition or organic product development. Ceridian also competes with cloud-enabled client-server HCM providers, such as The Ultimate Software Group, Inc. These companies, whose products were developed over 20 years ago as on-premise solutions, have modified and redeployed their platforms as hybrid software as a service offerings. This has allowed them to transition their business model to offer hosted and cloud solutions, resulting in significantly larger customer bases. More recently, Ceridian faces competition from modern HCM providers, such as Workday, Inc., whose solutions have been specifically built as single application platforms in the cloud. In addition, Ceridian also faces competition from large, long-established enterprise application software vendors, such as Oracle Corporation and SAP SE. These companies are seeking to expand their cloud offerings through both acquisition and internal development efforts. Ceridian also competes with point solutions, such as Kronos Incorporated for workforce management and Cornerstone OnDemand Inc. for talent management.
Restaurant Group. The restaurant industry is highly competitive and is often affected by changes in consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns; changes in general economic conditions; public safety conditions or concerns; demographic trends; weather conditions; the cost of food products, labor, energy and other operating costs; and governmental regulations. Higher labor costs due to state and local minimum wage increases and shopping pattern shifts to e-commerce and “ready to eat” grocery and convenience stores have had a negative impact on restaurant performance, particularly in the casual and family dining restaurants in which the Company operates.
The restaurant industry is also characterized by high capital investments for new restaurants and relatively high fixed or semi-variable restaurant operating expenses.  Because of the high fixed and semi-variable expenses, changes in sales in existing restaurants are generally expected to significantly affect restaurant profitability because many restaurant costs and expenses are not expected to change at the same rate as sales.  Restaurant profitability can also be negatively affected by inflationary and regulatory increases in operating costs and other factors. The most significant commodities that may affect our cost of food and beverage are beef, seafood, poultry, and dairy, which accounted for approximately half of our overall cost of food and beverage in the past. Generally, temporary increases in these costs are not passed on to guests; however, in the past, we have adjusted menu prices to compensate for increased costs of a more permanent nature. Our revenues in future periods will continue to be subject to these and other factors that are beyond our control and, as a result, are likely to fluctuate.

5


Competitive Strengths
Proven management team.  Our Board of Directors and executive management team, led by William ("Bill") P. Foley II, has a proven track record of investment identification and management. Bill Foley has led the creation of several multi-billion dollar companies with hundreds of acquisitions across diverse platforms, including, Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., Black Knight, Inc., Ceridian, and FGL Holdings, Inc. Our Board of Directors and executive management's breadth of knowledge of capital markets allows us to identify companies and strategic assets with attractive value propositions, to structure investments to maximize their value, and to return the value created to shareholders. We believe the Externalization under the Management Services Agreement will enhance our executive management team’s ability to provide these services.
Information Security
We and our unconsolidated affiliates are highly dependent on information technology networks and systems to securely process, transmit and store electronic information. Attacks on information technology systems continue to grow in frequency, complexity and sophistication. Such attacks have become a point of focus for individuals, businesses and governmental entities. These attacks can create system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, including non-public personal information, consumer data and proprietary business information.
We and our unconsolidated affiliates remain focused on making strategic investments in information security to protect the clients and information systems of our operating subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates. This includes both capital expenditures and operating expenses on hardware, software, personnel and consulting services. As the primary products and services of our operating subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates evolve, we apply a comprehensive approach to the mitigation of identified security risks. We have established risk management policies, including those related to information security and cybersecurity, designed to monitor and mitigate information security related risks.
Employees
As of January 31, 2020, Cannae and our consolidated subsidiaries had 22,482 full-time equivalent employees, which includes 22,281 in our Restaurant Group and 201 in the various businesses comprising our Corporate and other segment.
None of our employees are unionized or represented by any collective agency. We believe that our relations with employees are generally good.
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
 The statements contained in this Annual Report or in our other documents or in oral presentations or other statements made by our management that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") including statements regarding our expectations, hopes, intentions, or strategies regarding the future. These statements relate to, among other things, future financial and operating results of the Company. In many cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these statements as a result of a number of factors, including, but not limited to the following:
changes in general economic, business, and political conditions, including changes in the financial markets;
compliance with extensive government regulation of our operating subsidiaries and adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations or in their application by regulators;
the effects of the Externalization and the Management Services Agreement;
our ability to successfully execute the Blue Ribbon Reorganization;
loss of key personnel that could negatively affect our financial results and impair our operating abilities;
our potential inability to find suitable acquisition candidates, as well as the risks associated with acquisitions in lines of business that will not necessarily be limited to our traditional areas of focus, or difficulties integrating acquisitions;
other risks detailed in "Risk Factors" below and elsewhere in this document and in our other filings with the SEC.
 We are not under any obligation (and expressly disclaim any such obligation) to update or alter our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You should carefully consider the possibility that actual results may differ materially from our forward-looking statements.

6


 Additional Information
The Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act and files or furnishes reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.
 Our website address is www.cannaeholdings.com. We make available free of charge on or through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. However, the information found on our website is not part of this or any other report.
Item 1A.      Risk Factors
Risks Relating to the Company's Structure 
We may become subject to the Investment Company Act of 1940.
We do not believe that we are subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "40 Act"). We were formed for the purpose of effecting the Split-Off and for controlling, operating or holding, as applicable, the FNFV Group's business and investments, including the portfolio companies. We engage primarily in the business of managing and operating our controlled subsidiaries. Our officers and any employees who provide services to us pursuant to the terms of our corporate services agreement with FNF devote their activities to the businesses of these portfolio companies. Our interest in the portfolio companies comprises substantially all of our assets and substantially all of our income, if any, is derived from restaurant revenue from our Restaurant Group, the revenue of T-System, and dividends and other distributions made on our interests in portfolio companies. Based on these factors, we believe that we are not an investment company under the 40 Act, including under Section 3(b)(1) of the 40 Act. If, at any time, we become primarily engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, we could become subject to regulation under the 40 Act. Following any such change in our business and after giving effect to any applicable grace periods, we may be required to register as an investment company, which could result in significant registration and compliance costs, could require changes to our corporate governance structure and financial reporting, and could restrict our activities going forward. In addition, if we were to become inadvertently subject to the 40 Act, any violation of the 40 Act could subject us to material adverse consequences, including potentially significant regulatory penalties and the possibility that certain of our contracts would be deemed unenforceable.
Risks Relating to the Externalization and Our Manager
The Management Service Agreement was negotiated between related parties and the terms, including fees payable, may not be as favorable to us as if it were negotiated with an unaffiliated third party.
Because our Manager is owned by certain of our directors and executive officers, the Management Services Agreement was developed by related parties, although our independent directors reviewed and approved the Management Services Agreement. The terms of the Management Services Agreement, including fees payable, may not reflect the terms we may have received if it was negotiated with an unrelated third party. In addition, particularly as a result of our relationship with the principal owners of the Manager, who are certain directors and members of our management team, our independent directors may determine that it is in the best interests of our shareholders not to enforce, or to enforce less vigorously, our rights under the Management Services Agreement because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationship with our Manager.
Our executive officers, directors and Manager may allocate some of their time to other businesses, thereby causing conflicts of interest in their determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs, which may materially adversely affect our results of operations.
While the members of our management team anticipate devoting a substantial amount of their time to the affairs of the Company, our executive officers, directors, Manager and other members of our management team may engage in other business activities. This may result in a conflict of interest in allocating their time between our operations and our management and the operations of other businesses. Their other business endeavors may involve related or unrelated parties. Conflicts of interest that arise over the allocation of time may not always be resolved in our favor and may materially adversely affect our results of operations. See the section entitled “Factors Relating to the Split-Off” included in Item 1A of our Annual Report for further discussion of risks associated with our split-off from, and relationship with, FNF.
Conflicts of interest could arise in connection with certain of our directors’ and executive officers’ discharge of fiduciary duties to our shareholders.
Certain of our directors and executive officers are members or employees of the Manager. Such persons, by virtue of their positions with us, have fiduciary duties to us and our shareholders. The duties of such persons as directors or executive officers

7


to us and our shareholders may conflict with the interests of such persons in their capacities as members or employees of the Manager.
Our Manager and members of our management team may engage in activities that compete with us or our businesses.
While the members of our management team intend to devote a substantial majority of their time to the affairs of the Company, and while our Manager currently does not manage any other businesses that are in lines of business similar to our businesses, neither our management team nor our Manager is expressly prohibited from investing in or managing other entities, including those that are in the same or similar line of business as our businesses, or required to present any particular investment or business opportunity to the Company. In this regard, the Management Services Agreement and the obligation thereunder to provide management services to us will not create a mutually exclusive relationship between our Manager, on the one hand, and the Company, on the other.
We cannot remove our Manager solely for poor performance, which could limit our ability to improve our performance and could adversely affect the market price of our shares.
Under the terms of the Management Services Agreement, our Manager may not be removed as a result of underperformance. Instead, the Company’s board of directors may only remove our Manager in certain limited circumstances or upon a vote by 75% of the Company’s board of directors and 75% of our shareholders to terminate the Management Services Agreement. This limitation could adversely affect the market price of our shares.
Our Manager can resign on 180 days’ notice, subject to a limited extension, and we may not be able to find a suitable replacement, resulting in a disruption in our operations that could materially adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations as well as the market price of our shares.
Our Manager has the right, under the Management Services Agreement, to resign at any time on 180 days’ written notice, whether we have found a replacement or not, subject to the Company’s right to extend such period by an additional 180 days or until a replacement manager has been in place for 30 days, if no replacement manager has been found by the 150th day following the Manager’s notice of resignation. If our Manager resigns, we may not be able to contract with a new manager or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms within 180 days (subject to possible extension), or at all, in which case our operations are likely to experience a disruption; our financial condition, business and results of operations as well as our ability to pay distributions are likely to be adversely affected; and the market price of our shares may decline. In addition, the coordination of our internal management, acquisition activities and supervision of our businesses is likely to suffer if we are unable to identify and reach an agreement with a single institution or group of executives having the expertise possessed by our Manager. Even if we are able to retain comparable management, whether internal or external, the integration of such management and their lack of familiarity with our businesses may result in additional costs and time delays that could materially adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations.
We must pay our Manager the management fee regardless of our performance.
Our Manager is entitled to receive a management fee that is based on our cost of invested capital, as defined in the Management Services Agreement, regardless of the performance of our businesses. The calculation of the management fee is unrelated to the Company’s results of operations. As a result, the management fee may incentivize our Manager to increase the amount of invested capital.
We cannot determine the amount of the management fee that will be paid over time with any certainty, nor are we able to determine with any certainty the amount of carried interest that will be paid over time, and our payment of such fees and carried interest to the Manager may significantly reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
Under the Management Services Agreement, the Company will be obligated to pay a management fee to and, subject to certain exceptions, reimburse the costs and out-of-pocket expenses of our Manager incurred on behalf of the Company in connection with the provision of services to the Company. The management fee is calculated by reference to the Company’s cost of invested capital, which will be impacted by the acquisition or disposition of, and additional capital contributions and investments in, businesses, which can be significantly influenced by our Manager, as well as the performance of our businesses and other businesses we may acquire in the future. Changes in cost of invested capital and in the resulting management fee could be significant, resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations. In addition, if the performance of the Company declines, assuming cost of invested capital remains the same, management fees will increase as a percentage of the Company’s net income.
Furthermore, we cannot determine the amount of carried interest with respect to liquidity events involving investments of the Company that will be paid over time with any certainty. Such determination would be dependent on the potential sale proceeds received for any of our businesses and the performance of the Company and its businesses over a multi-year period of time, among other factors that cannot be predicted with certainty at this time. Such factors may have a significant impact on the amount of any carried interest to be paid to the Manager. Likewise, such determination would be dependent on whether certain hurdles were

8


surpassed giving rise to a payment of carried interest. Any amounts paid in respect of the carried interest are unrelated to the management fee earned for performance of services under the Management Services Agreement.
While it is difficult to quantify with any certainty the actual amount of any such payments in the future, such amounts could be substantial. The management fee and carried interest will be payment obligations of the Company and, as a result, will be paid, along with other Company obligations, prior to the payment of distributions to shareholders. As a result the payment of these amounts may significantly reduce the amount of cash flow available for distribution to our shareholders. If we do not have sufficient liquid assets to pay the management fee and carried interest when such payments are due, we may be required to liquidate assets or incur debt in order to make such payments. This circumstance could materially adversely affect our liquidity and ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
Our profit allocation may induce our Manager to make suboptimal decisions regarding our operations.
Our Manager will receive carried interest based on profits in excess of an annualized hurdle rate upon a liquidity event involving a Company investment. In this respect, a calculation and payment of carried interest may be triggered upon the sale of one of our businesses. As a result, our Manager may be incentivized to recommend the sale of one or more of our businesses to our Board of Directors at a time that may not be optimal for our shareholders.
Risks Relating to the Restaurant Group
General macroeconomic factors, including unemployment, energy prices and interest rates, and certain economic and business factors specific to the restaurant and bakery industries that are largely out of our restaurant businesses' control may materially and adversely affect consumer behavior and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
General economic conditions may materially and adversely affect the financial condition and results of operations of our restaurant businesses, which we also refer to as our Restaurant Group companies. Recessionary economic cycles, a protracted economic slowdown, a worsening economy, increased unemployment, increased energy prices, rising interest rates, a downgrade of the United States ("U.S.") government's long-term credit rating, financial market volatility and unpredictability or other national, regional and local regulatory and economic conditions or other industry-wide cost pressures could affect consumer behavior and spending for restaurant dining occasions and result in increased pressure with respect to our Restaurant Group companies' pricing, guest count levels and commodity costs, which could lead to a further decline in our Restaurant Group companies' sales and earnings, beyond those that resulted in the Blue Ribbon Reorganization. Job losses, foreclosures, bankruptcies and falling home prices could cause customers to make fewer discretionary purchases, and any significant decrease in our Restaurant Group companies' guest counts or profit will negatively impact their financial performance. In addition, if gasoline, natural gas, electricity and other energy costs increase, or credit card, home mortgage and other borrowing costs increase with rising interest rates, our Restaurant Group companies' customers may have lower disposable income and reduce the frequency with which they dine at restaurants, may spend less during each visit at our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants or may choose more inexpensive restaurants. These factors could also cause the Restaurant Group companies to, among other things, reduce the number and frequency of new restaurant openings, close additional restaurants, delay the reimaging of the Restaurant Group companies' existing restaurant locations, or impede our ability to successfully execute, and achieve the goals contemplated by, the Blue Ribbon Reorganization.
Furthermore, we cannot predict the effects that actual or threatened armed conflicts, terrorist attacks, efforts to combat terrorism, including military action against any foreign state or local group located in a foreign state, heightened security requirements on local, regional, national or international economies or a failure to protect information systems for critical infrastructure, such as the electrical grid and telecommunications systems, could have on the Restaurant Group companies' operations, the economy or consumer confidence generally. Any of these events could affect consumer spending patterns or result in increased costs for the Restaurant Group companies due to security measures.
The business results of our Restaurant Group companies depend on a number of industry-specific factors as well, many of which are beyond the Restaurant Group companies' control. The full service dining sector of the restaurant industry is affected by seasonal fluctuation of sales volumes, consumer confidence, consumer spending patterns and consumer preferences, including changes in consumer tastes and dietary habits, and the level of consumer acceptance of our restaurant brands. The performance of individual restaurants may also be materially and adversely affected by factors applicable to those restaurants, such as demographic trends, severe weather, traffic patterns and the type, number and location of competing restaurants.
Unfavorable changes in the above factors or in other business and economic conditions affecting our Restaurant Group companies' customers or industry could increase costs, reduce guest counts in some or all restaurants or impose practical limits on pricing, any of which could lower profit margins and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


9


The Restaurant Group companies face significant competition for customers, real estate and employees and competitive pressure to adapt to changes in conditions driving customer demand. The Restaurant Group companies' inability to compete effectively may affect guest counts, sales and profit margins, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The restaurant industry is intensely competitive with a substantial number of restaurant operators that compete directly and indirectly with the Restaurant Group companies with respect to price, service, ambiance, brand, customer service, dining experience, location, food quality and variety and value perception of menu items and there are other well established competitors with substantially greater financial and other resources than the Restaurant Group companies. Some of our Restaurant Group companies' competitors advertise on national television, which may provide customers with greater awareness and name recognition than our Restaurant Group companies can achieve through their advertising efforts. There is also active competition for management personnel and attractive suitable real estate sites. Consumer tastes and perceptions, nutritional and dietary trends, guest count patterns and the type, number and location of competing restaurants often affect the restaurant business, and our Restaurant Group companies' competitors may react more efficiently and effectively to those conditions. For instance, prevailing health or dietary preferences or perceptions of our Restaurant Group companies' products may cause consumers to avoid certain menu items or products our Restaurant Group companies offer in favor of foods that are perceived as more healthy, and such choices by consumers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, our Restaurant Group companies face growing competition from the supermarket industry, with the improvement of their "convenient meals" in the deli and prepared food sections, from quick service and fast casual restaurants and online food delivery services as a result of food and beverage offerings by those food providers. As our Restaurant Group companies' competitors expand operations in markets where our restaurant businesses operate or expect to operate, we expect competition to intensify. If our Restaurant Group companies are unable to continue to compete effectively, including following the completion of the Blue Ribbon Reorganization, their guest counts, sales and profit margins could decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Historically, customer spending patterns for the Restaurant Group companies' restaurants are generally highest in the fourth quarter of the year and lowest in the third quarter of the year. Sales activity during the holidays may affect seasonal sales volumes in some of the markets in which our restaurant businesses operate. The quarterly results of our Restaurant Group companies have been and will continue to be affected by the timing of new restaurant openings and their associated costs (which are often materially greater during the first several months of operation than thereafter), restaurant closures and exit-related costs, labor availability and costs for hourly and management personnel, profitability of restaurants, especially in new markets, trends in comparable restaurant sales, changes in borrowings and interest rates, changes in consumer preferences and competitive conditions, fluctuations in food and commodity prices, fluctuations in costs attributable to public company compliance and impairments of goodwill, intangible assets and property, fixtures and equipment. As a result of these and other factors, the Restaurant Group companies' financial results for any quarter may not be indicative of the results that may be achieved for a full fiscal year.
If our restaurant businesses are unable to effectively grow revenue and profitability at certain of their locations, our Restaurant Group companies may be required to record additional impairment charges to their restaurant assets, the carrying value of their goodwill or other intangible assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our Restaurant Group companies assess the potential impairment of their long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets or asset group may not be recoverable. Factors considered include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner in which an asset is being used, an expectation that an asset will be disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life and significant negative industry or economic trends. Our Restaurant Group companies annually review and compare the carrying value of intangible assets, including goodwill, to the fair value. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we recorded $10.4 million and $26.7 million, respectively, of impairment to goodwill in our Restaurant Group segment as a result of deteriorating operating results and cash flow resulting from declining same store sales and increased costs. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we recorded $17.1 million, $5.8 million and $2.9 million, respectively, of impairment expense related to other intangible assets within our Restaurant Group.
We cannot accurately predict the amount and timing of any future recorded impairment to our Restaurant Group companies' assets. Should the value of goodwill or other intangible or long-lived assets become further impaired, there could be a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Increased commodity, energy and other costs could decrease our Restaurant Group companies' profit margins or cause the Restaurant Group companies to limit or otherwise modify their menus, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The cost, availability and quality of ingredients restaurant operations use to prepare their food is subject to a range of factors, many of which are beyond their control. A significant component of our restaurant businesses' costs will be related to food

10


commodities, including beef, pork, chicken, seafood, poultry, dairy products, oils, produce, fruit, flour and other related costs such as energy and transportation over which we may have little control, which can be subject to significant price fluctuations due to seasonal shifts, climate conditions, industry demand, changes in international commodity markets and other factors. If there is a substantial increase in prices for these commodities, our Restaurant Group companies' results of operations may be negatively affected. In addition, the Restaurant Group companies' restaurants are dependent upon frequent deliveries of perishable food products that meet certain specifications. Shortages or interruptions in the supply of perishable food products caused by unanticipated demand, problems in production or distribution, disease or food-borne illnesses, inclement weather or other conditions could adversely affect the availability, quality, and cost of ingredients, which would likely lower revenues, damage the Restaurant Group companies' reputation or otherwise harm our business.
The Restaurant Group companies are also subject to the general risks of inflation. The performance of our Restaurant Group companies' business is also adversely affected by increases in the price of utilities, such as natural gas, whether as a result of inflation, shortages or interruptions in supply, or otherwise. The Restaurant Group companies' business will also incur significant costs for insurance, labor, marketing, taxes, real estate, borrowing and litigation, all of which could increase due to inflation, changes in laws and regulations, competition or other events beyond the Restaurant Group companies' control.
Negative customer experiences or negative publicity surrounding our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants or other restaurants could adversely affect sales in one or more of our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants and make our concepts less valuable, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because we believe our Restaurant Group companies' success depends significantly on their ability to provide exceptional food quality, outstanding service and an excellent overall dining experience, adverse publicity, whether or not accurate, relating to food quality, public health concerns, illness, safety, injury or government or industry findings concerning our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants, restaurants operated by other food service providers or others across the food industry supply chain could affect our Restaurant Group companies more than it would other restaurants that compete primarily on price or other factors. If customers perceive or experience a reduction in the food quality, service or ambiance at our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants or in any way believe our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants have failed to deliver a consistently positive experience, the value and popularity of one or more of our Restaurant Group companies' concepts could suffer. Further, because our restaurant businesses rely heavily on "word-of-mouth," as opposed to more conventional mediums of advertisement, to establish concept recognition, our restaurant businesses may be more adversely affected by negative customer experiences than other dining establishments, including those of our restaurant businesses' competitors.
Our restaurant businesses could suffer due to reduced demand for our restaurant businesses' brands or specific menu offerings if our restaurant businesses are the subject of negative publicity or litigation regarding allegations of food-related contaminations or illnesses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Food safety is a top priority, and our Restaurant Group companies dedicate substantial resources to ensuring that their customers enjoy safe, quality food products. Food-related contaminations and illnesses may be caused by a variety of food-borne pathogens, such as e-coli or salmonella, which are frequently carried on unwashed fruits and vegetables, from a variety of illnesses transmitted by restaurant workers, such as hepatitis A, which may not be diagnosed prior to being infectious, and from contamination of food by foreign substances. Contamination and food borne illness incidents could also be caused at the point of source or by food suppliers and distributors. As a result, we cannot control all of the potential sources of contamination or illness that can be contained in or transmitted from our Restaurant Group companies' food. Regardless of the source or cause, any report of food-borne illnesses or other food safety issues including food tampering or contamination, at one of our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants could adversely affect the reputation of our Restaurant Group companies' brands and have a negative impact on their sales. Even instances of food-borne illness, food tampering or food contamination occurring solely at restaurants of our Restaurant Group companies' competitors or at one of our Restaurant Group companies' suppliers could result in negative publicity about the food service industry generally and adversely impact our Restaurant Group companies' sales.
If any person becomes injured or ill, or alleges becoming injured or ill, as a result of eating our Restaurant Group companies' food, our Restaurant Group companies may temporarily close some restaurants or their bakery facilities, which would decrease their revenues, and our restaurant businesses may be liable for damages or be subject to governmental regulatory action, either of which could have long-lasting, negative effects on our restaurant businesses' reputation, financial condition and results of operations, regardless of whether the allegations are valid or whether our restaurant businesses are found liable. The occurrence of food-borne illnesses or food safety issues could also adversely affect the price and availability of affected ingredients, resulting in higher costs and lower margins.
Our Restaurant Group companies' failure to comply with government regulation, and the costs of compliance or non-compliance, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Restaurant Group companies are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting their business. Each of their restaurants and their bakery division are subject to licensing and regulation by a number of federal, state and local

11


governmental authorities, which may include, among others, alcoholic beverage control, health and safety, nutritional menu labeling, health care, environmental and fire agencies. Difficulty in obtaining or failure to obtain the required licenses, including liquor or other licenses, permits or approval could delay or prevent the development of a new restaurant in a particular area. Additionally, difficulties or inabilities to retain or renew licenses, or increased compliance costs due to changed regulations, could adversely affect operations at existing restaurants.
While only approximately 9% of the Restaurant Group companies' consolidated restaurant sales in 2019 were attributable to the sale of alcoholic beverages, approximately 19% of the restaurant sales at Ninety Nine were attributable to the sale of alcoholic beverages in 2019. Alcoholic beverage control regulations require each restaurant to apply to a state authority and, in certain locations, county or municipal authorities for a license or permit to sell alcoholic beverages on the premises and to provide service for extended hours and on Sundays. Typically, licenses must be renewed annually and may be revoked or suspended for cause at any time. Alcoholic beverage control regulations relate to numerous aspects of daily operations of the Restaurant Group companies' restaurants, including minimum ages of patrons and employees, hours of operation, advertising, training, wholesale purchasing, inventory control and the handling, storage and dispensation of alcoholic beverages. The failure of a restaurant to obtain or retain liquor or food service licenses would adversely affect the restaurant's operations.
 There is also a potential for increased regulation of certain food establishments in the U.S., where compliance with Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Points ("HACCP") management systems may now be required. HACCP refers to a management system in which food safety is addressed through the analysis and control of potential hazards from raw material production, procurement and handling, to manufacturing, distribution and consumption of the finished product. Many states have required restaurants to develop and implement HACCP programs and the U.S. government continues to expand the sectors of the food industry that must adopt and implement HACCP programs. For example, the Food Safety Modernization Act, signed into law in January 2011, granted the FDA new authority regarding the safety of the entire food system, including through increased inspections and mandatory food recalls. We anticipate that the new requirements may impact the restaurant industry. Additionally, our Restaurant Group companies' suppliers may initiate or otherwise be subject to food recalls that may impact the availability of certain products, result in adverse publicity or require the Restaurant Group companies' to take actions that could be costly for them or otherwise harm their business.
The Restaurant Group companies are subject to laws and regulations relating to information security, privacy, cashless payments, gift cards and consumer credit, protection and fraud, and any failure or perceived or alleged failure to comply with these laws and regulations could harm their reputation or lead to litigation, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The impact of current laws and regulations, the effect of future changes in laws or regulations that impose additional requirements and the consequences of litigation relating to current or future laws and regulations, or an insufficient or ineffective response to significant regulatory or public policy issues, could increase our Restaurant Group companies' cost structure or lessen their operational efficiencies and talent availability, and therefore have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Failure to comply with the laws and regulatory requirements of federal, state and local authorities could result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses, administrative enforcement actions, fines and civil and criminal liability. Compliance with these laws and regulations can be costly and can increase the Restaurant Group companies' exposure to litigation or governmental investigations or proceedings.
Restaurant companies, including our restaurant companies, are the target of claims and lawsuits from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Proceedings of this nature, if successful, could result in our payment of substantial costs and damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our Restaurant Group companies and other restaurant companies have been subject to claims and lawsuits alleging various matters from time to time in the ordinary course of business, including those that follow. Claims and lawsuits may include class action lawsuits, alleging violations of federal and state laws regarding workplace and employment matters, discrimination and similar matters. A number of these lawsuits have resulted in the payment of substantial damages by the defendants. Similar lawsuits have been instituted from time to time alleging violations of various federal and state wage and hour laws regarding, among other things, employee meal deductions, the sharing of tips amongst certain employees, overtime eligibility of assistant managers and failure to pay for all hours worked. Although our restaurant businesses will maintain what we believe to be adequate levels of insurance, insurance may not be available at all or in sufficient amounts to cover any liabilities with respect to these matters. Accordingly, if our restaurant businesses are required to pay substantial damages and expenses as a result of these types or other lawsuits, such payments or expenses could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Occasionally, our Restaurant Group companies' customers may file complaints or lawsuits against the Restaurant Group companies alleging that they are responsible for some illness or injury the customers suffered at or after a visit to one of the Restaurant Group companies' restaurants, including actions seeking damages resulting from food-borne illness and relating to notices with respect to chemicals contained in food products required under state law. Our Restaurant Group companies may also be subject to a variety of other claims from third parties arising in the ordinary course of their business, including personal injury

12


claims, contract claims and claims alleging violations of federal and state laws. In addition, most of our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants are subject to state "dram shop" or similar laws which generally allow a person to sue our restaurant businesses if that person was injured by a legally intoxicated person who was wrongfully served alcoholic beverages at one of our Restaurant Group companies' restaurants. The restaurant industry has also been subject to a growing number of claims that the menus and actions of restaurant chains have led to the obesity of certain of their customers. In addition, the Restaurant Group companies may also be subject to lawsuits from their employees or others alleging violations of federal and state laws regarding workplace and employment matters, discrimination and similar matters. A number of these lawsuits in the restaurant industry have resulted in the payment of substantial damages by the defendants.
Additionally, certain of the Restaurant Group companies' tax returns and employment practices are subject to audits by the IRS and various state tax authorities. Such audits could result in disputes regarding tax matters that could lead to litigation that would be costly to defend or could result in the payment of additional taxes, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Regardless of whether any claims against the Restaurant Group companies are valid or whether they are liable, claims may be expensive to defend and may divert resources away from their operations. In addition, such claims may generate negative publicity, which could reduce customer traffic and sales. Although our restaurant businesses will maintain what they believe to be adequate levels of insurance, insurance may not be available at all or in sufficient amounts to cover any liabilities with respect to these or other matters. Defense costs, even for unfounded claims, or a judgment or other liability in excess of our restaurant businesses' insurance coverage for any claims or any adverse publicity resulting from claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Restaurant Group companies rely heavily on information technology and any material failure, interruption, or security breach in their systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Restaurant Group companies rely heavily on information technology systems across their operations and corporate functions, including for order and delivery from suppliers and distributors, point-of-sale processing in their restaurants, management of their supply chains, payment of obligations, collection of cash, bakery production, data warehousing to support analytics, finance or accounting systems, labor optimization tools, gift cards, online business and various other processes and transactions, including the storage of employee and customer information. The Restaurant Group companies' ability to effectively manage their business and coordinate the production, distribution and sale of their products will depend significantly on the reliability and capacity of these systems. In 2015, the Restaurant Group companies upgraded their information systems using a third-party provider. However, the failure of these systems to operate effectively, maintenance problems or problems with transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems could cause delays in product sales and reduced efficiency of our restaurant businesses' operations, and significant capital investments could be required to remediate the problem.
The regulatory environment surrounding information security and privacy is increasingly demanding, with the frequent imposition of new and constantly changing requirements. Compliance with these requirements may result in cost increases due to necessary systems changes and the development of new administrative processes. In addition, customers and employees have a high expectation that our restaurant businesses will adequately protect their personal information. The majority of our restaurant businesses' restaurant sales are by credit or debit cards. We and other restaurants and retailers have experienced security breaches in which credit and debit card information of their customers has been stolen.
In addition, any breach in customer payment information could result in investigations by the U.S. Secret Service Electronic Crimes Task Force ("ECTF") and increased cost in our restaurant businesses' efforts to cooperate with the ECTF.
The Restaurant Group companies also maintain certain personal information regarding their employees. In addition to government investigations, the Restaurant Group companies may in the future become subject to lawsuits or other proceedings for purportedly fraudulent transactions arising out of the actual or alleged theft of their customers' credit or debit card information or if customer or employee information is obtained by unauthorized persons or used inappropriately. If the Restaurant Group companies fail to comply with these laws and regulations or experience a significant breach of customer, employee or company data, their reputation could be damaged and they could experience lost sales, fines or lawsuits. Additionally, if a person is able to circumvent the security measures intended to protect our Restaurant Group companies' employee or customer private data, he or she could destroy or steal valuable information and disrupt our restaurant businesses' operations. The Restaurant Group companies may also be required to incur additional costs to modify or enhance their systems in order to prevent or remediate any such attacks.
The success of the Restaurant Group depends, in part, on its intellectual property, which we may be unable to protect.
We regard our Restaurant Group's service marks, including "O'Charley's", "Ninety Nine", "Village Inn", "Legendary Baking", and "Bakers Square", and other service marks and trademarks as important factors in the marketing of our restaurants. We have also obtained trademarks for several of our brand's menu items and for various advertising slogans. We are aware of names and marks similar to our Restaurant Group's service marks and trademarks used by other persons in certain geographic areas where

13


we have restaurants. We believe such uses will not adversely affect us and our policy is to pursue registration of our marks whenever possible and to oppose vigorously any infringement of our marks.
We license the use of our registered trademarks and service marks to franchisees and third parties through franchise arrangements and licenses. The franchise and license arrangements restrict franchisees' and licensees' activities with respect to the use of our trademarks and service marks, and impose quality control standards in connection with goods and services offered in connection with the trademarks and service marks.
Occasionally, third parties may assert that we are, or may be, infringing on or misappropriating their intellectual property rights. In these cases, we intend to defend against claims or negotiate licenses when we consider these actions appropriate. Intellectual property cases are uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. If we become involved in this type of litigation, it could consume significant resources and divert our attention from business operations.
If we are found to infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, we could incur significant damages, be enjoined from continuing to use certain marks, or be required to obtain a license to continue using the affected marketing and promotional materials. A license could be very expensive to obtain or may not be available at all. Similarly, changing our marketing plan to avoid infringing the rights of others may be costly or impracticable.
We are subject to risks and uncertainties associated with the Blue Ribbon Reorganization
On January 27, 2020, Blue Ribbon, which owns the Village Inn, Bakers Square and Legendary Baking concepts, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Blue Ribbon Reorganization"). Blue Ribbon is subject to risks and uncertainties associated with the Blue Ribbon Reorganization, including but not limited to (i) its ability to maintain relationships with its suppliers, service providers, customers, employees and other third parties, (ii) the ability of third parties to seek and obtain court approval to terminate contracts and other agreements with Blue Ribbon, (iii) the actions and decisions of Blue Ribbons' creditors and other third parties who have interests in the Blue Ribbon Reorganization that may be inconsistent with our plans, (iv) limitations on Blue Ribbons operating flexibility during the proceedings and (v) our ability to compromise certain claims through the Blue Ribbon Reorganization. While we do not expect the Blue Ribbon Reorganization to have a material adverse effect on the Company, adverse changes in facts and circumstances as the Blue Ribbon Reorganization progresses could change that assertion and result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Relating to the Company's Investment in Ceridian
An information security breach of Ceridian's systems or the loss of, or unauthorized access to, customer information, failure to comply with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) ongoing consent order regarding data protection, or a system disruption could have a material adverse effect on our business, market brand, financial condition, and results of operations.
Ceridian's business is dependent on its payroll, transaction, financial, accounting, and other data processing systems. Ceridian relies on these systems to process, on a daily and time sensitive basis, a large number of complicated transactions. Ceridian electronically receives, processes, stores, and transmits data and personally identifiable information (“PII”) about its customers and their employees, as well as its vendors and other business partners, including names, social security numbers, and checking account numbers. Ceridian keeps this information confidential. However, Ceridian's websites, networks, applications and technologies, and other information systems may be targeted for sabotage, disruption, or data misappropriation. The uninterrupted operation of Ceridian's information systems and Ceridian's ability to maintain the confidentiality of PII and other customer and individual information that resides on its systems are critical to the successful operation of Ceridian's business. While Ceridian has information security and business continuity programs, these plans may not be sufficient to ensure the uninterrupted operation of its systems or to prevent unauthorized access to the systems by unauthorized third parties. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and may not be recognized until launched against a target, Ceridian may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. These concerns about information security are increased with the mounting sophistication of social engineering. Ceridian's network security hardening may be bypassed by phishing and other social engineering techniques that seek to use end user behaviors to distribute computer viruses and malware into its systems, which might disrupt Ceridian's delivery of services and make them unavailable, and might also result in the disclosure or misappropriation of PII or other confidential or sensitive information. In addition, a significant cyber security breach could prevent or delay Ceridian's ability to process payment transactions.
Any information security breach in Ceridian's business processes or of its processing systems has the potential to impact its customer information and its financial reporting capabilities, which could result in the potential loss of business and Ceridian's ability to accurately report financial results. If any of these systems fail to operate properly or become disabled even for a brief period of time, Ceridian could potentially miss a critical filing period, resulting in potential fees and penalties, or lose control of customer data, all of which could result in financial loss, a disruption of Ceridian's businesses, liability to customers, regulatory intervention, or damage to its reputation. The continued occurrence of high-profile data breaches provides evidence of an external environment increasingly hostile to information security. If Ceridian's security measures are breached as a result of third party

14


action, employee or subcontractor error, malfeasance or otherwise, and, as a result, someone obtains unauthorized access to customer data, Ceridian's reputation may be damaged, its business may suffer, and Ceridian could incur significant liability. Ceridian may also experience security breaches that may remain undetected for an extended period of time. Techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and are growing increasingly sophisticated. As a result, Ceridian may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures.
This environment demands that Ceridian continuously improve its design and coordination of security controls throughout the company. Despite these efforts, it is possible that Ceridian's security controls over data, training, and other practices it follows may not prevent the improper disclosure of PII or other confidential information. Any issue of data privacy as it relates to unauthorized access to or loss of customer and/or employee information could result in the potential loss of business, damage to Ceridian's market reputation, litigation, and regulatory investigation and penalties. Maintaining, updating, monitoring, and revising an information security program in an effort to ensure that it remains reasonable and appropriate in light of changes in security threats, changes in technology, and security vulnerabilities that arise from legacy systems is time-consuming and complex, and is an ongoing effort.
There may be other such security vulnerabilities that come to Ceridian's attention. The independent third party that reviews Ceridian's security program pursuant to the FTC consent order may determine that the existence of vulnerabilities in its security controls or the failure to remedy them in a timeframe they deem appropriate means that its security program does not provide a reasonable level of assurance that the security, confidentiality, and integrity of PII is protected by Ceridian (or that there was a failure to protect at some point in the reporting period). While Ceridian has taken and continues to take steps to ensure compliance with the consent order, if they are determined not to be in compliance with the consent order, or if any new breaches of security occur, the FTC may take enforcement actions or other parties may initiate a lawsuit. Any such resulting fines and penalties could have a material adverse effect on Ceridian's liquidity and financial results, and any reputational damage therefrom could adversely affect Ceridian's relationships with its existing customers and its ability to attain new customers. Ceridian's continued investment in the security of its technology systems, continued efforts to improve the controls within its technology systems, business processes improvements and the enhancements to its culture of information security may not successfully prevent attempts to breach Ceridian's security or unauthorized access to PII or other confidential, sensitive or proprietary information. In addition, in the event of a catastrophic occurrence, either natural or man-made, Ceridian's ability to protect its infrastructure, including PII and other customer data, and to maintain ongoing operations could be significantly impaired. Ceridian's business continuity and disaster recovery plans and strategies may not be successful in mitigating the effects of a catastrophic occurrence. Insurance may be inadequate or may not be available in the future on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, Ceridian's insurance policies may not cover all claims made against them, and defending a suit, regardless of its merit, could be costly and divert management’s attention. If Ceridian's security is breached, if PII or other confidential information is accessed, if Ceridian fails to comply with the consent order or if Ceridian experiences a catastrophic occurrence, it could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, and results of operations, and ultimately the value of our investment in Ceridian.
Ceridian's solutions and business are subject to a variety of U.S. and international laws and regulations, including those regarding privacy, data protection, and information security. Any failure by Ceridian or its third party service providers, as well as the failure of its platform or services, to comply with applicable laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Ceridian is subject to a variety of U.S. and international laws and regulations, including regulation by various federal government agencies, including the FTC, and state and local agencies. The United States and various state and foreign governments have adopted or proposed limitations on, or requirements regarding, the collection, distribution, use, security, and storage of PII of individuals; and the FTC and many state attorneys general are applying federal and state consumer protection laws to impose standards on the online collection, use and dissemination of data. Self-regulatory obligations, other industry standards, policies, and other legal obligations may apply to Ceridian's collection, distribution, use, security, or storage of PII or other data relating to individuals. In addition, most states and some foreign governments have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving certain types of PII. These obligations may be interpreted and applied in an inconsistent manner from one jurisdiction to another and may conflict with one another, other regulatory requirements, or Ceridian's internal practices. Any failure or perceived failure by Ceridian to comply with U.S., E.U., or other foreign privacy or security laws, regulations, policies, industry standards, or legal obligations, or any security incident that results in the unauthorized access to, or acquisition, release, or transfer of, PII may result in governmental enforcement actions, litigation, fines and penalties, or adverse publicity and could cause Ceridian's customers to lose trust in it, which could harm its reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We expect that there will continue to be new proposed laws, regulations, and industry standards concerning privacy, data protection and information security in the United States, Canada, the European Union, and other jurisdictions, and we cannot yet determine the impact such future laws, regulations, and standards may have on Ceridian's business. For example, in May 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation came into force, bringing with it a complete overhaul of E.U. data protection laws: the new rules supersede E.U. data protection legislation, impose more stringent E.U. data protection requirements, and provide for

15


greater penalties for non-compliance. Changing definitions of what constitutes PII may also limit or inhibit Ceridian's ability to operate or to expand its business, including limiting strategic partnerships that may involve the sharing of data. Also, some jurisdictions require that certain types of data be retained on servers within these jurisdictions. Ceridian's failure to comply with applicable laws, directives, and regulations may result in enforcement action against it, including fines and imprisonment, and damage to Ceridian's reputation, any of which may have an adverse effect on its business and operating results. Further, in October 2015, the European Court of Justice issued a ruling invalidating the U.S.-E.U. Safe Harbor Framework, which facilitated transfers of PII to the United States in compliance with applicable E.U. data protection laws. In July 2016, the E.U. and the U.S. political authorities adopted the E.U.-U.S. Privacy Shield, replacing the Safe Harbor Framework and providing a new mechanism for companies to transfer E.U. PII to the United States. U.S. organizations wishing to self-certify under the Privacy Shield must pledge their compliance with its seven core and sixteen supplemental principles, which are based on European Data Protection Law.
If Ceridian's service is perceived to cause, or is otherwise unfavorably associated with, violations of privacy or data security requirements, it may subject it or its customers to public criticism and potential legal liability. Public concerns regarding PII processing, privacy and security may cause some of its customers’ end users to be less likely to visit their websites or otherwise interact with them. If enough end users choose not to visit Ceridian's customers’ websites or otherwise interact with them, Ceridian's customers could stop using its platform. This, in turn, may reduce the value of its services and slow or eliminate the growth of its business. Existing and potential privacy laws and regulations concerning privacy and data security and increasing sensitivity of consumers to unauthorized processing of PII may create negative public reactions to technologies, products, and services such as Ceridian's.
Evolving and changing definitions of what constitutes PII and / or “Personal Data” within the United States, Canada, the European Union, and elsewhere, especially relating to the classification of internet protocol, or IP addresses, machine or device identification numbers, location data and other information, may limit or inhibit Ceridian's ability to operate or to expand its business. Future laws, regulations, standards and other obligations could impair Ceridian's ability to collect or to use information that it utilizes to provide email delivery and marketing services to its customers, thereby impairing its ability to maintain and to grow its customer base and to increase revenue. Future restrictions on the collection, use, sharing, or disclosure of our customers’ data or additional requirements for express or implied consent of customers for the use and disclosure of such information may limit our ability to develop new services and features.
Privacy concerns and laws or other domestic or foreign data protection regulations may reduce the effectiveness of Ceridian's applications, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Ceridian's customers can use its applications to collect, to use, and to store PII regarding their employees, independent contractors, and job applicants. Federal, state, and foreign government bodies and agencies have adopted, are considering adopting, or may adopt laws and regulations regarding the collection, use, storage and disclosure of PII obtained from individuals. The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, such laws and regulations that are applicable to the businesses of Ceridian's customers, or to its business directly, may limit the use and adoption of Ceridian's applications and reduce overall demand, or lead to significant fines, penalties, or liabilities for any non-compliance with such privacy laws. Furthermore, privacy concerns may cause Ceridian's customers’ workers to resist providing PII necessary to allow its customers to use its applications effectively. Even the perception of privacy concerns, whether or not valid, may inhibit market adoption of Ceridian's applications in certain industries.
All of these domestic and international legislative and regulatory initiatives may adversely affect Ceridian's customers’ ability to process, to handle, to store, to use, and to transmit demographic information and PII from their employees, independent contractors, job applicants, customers, and suppliers, which could reduce demand for Ceridian's applications. The European Union and many countries in Europe have stringent privacy laws and regulations, which may impact Ceridian's ability to profitably operate in certain European countries.
Further, international data protection regulations trending toward increased localized data residency rules make transfers from outside the regulation’s jurisdiction increasingly complex and may impact Ceridian's ability to deliver solutions that meet all customers’ needs. If the processing of PII were to be further curtailed in this manner, Ceridian's solutions could be less effective, which may reduce demand for our applications, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, and results of operations, and ultimately the value of our investment in Ceridian.
In addition to government activity, privacy advocacy groups and the technology and other industries are considering various new, additional, or different self-regulatory standards that may place additional burdens on Ceridian. If the processing of PII were to be curtailed in this manner, Ceridian's solutions would be less effective, which may reduce demand for its applications, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, and results of operations, and ultimately the value of our investment in Ceridian.


16


Litigation and regulatory investigations aimed at Ceridian or resulting from actions of its predecessor may result in significant financial losses and harm to its reputation.
Ceridian faces risk of litigation, regulatory investigations, and similar actions in the ordinary course of its business, including the risk of lawsuits and other legal actions relating to breaches of contractual obligations or tortious claims from customers or other third parties, fines, penalties, interest, or other damages as a result of erroneous transactions, breach of data privacy laws, or lawsuits and legal actions related to Ceridian's predecessors. Any such action may include claims for substantial or unspecified compensatory damages, as well as civil, regulatory, or criminal proceedings against Ceridian's directors, officers, or employees; and the probability and amount of liability, if any, may remain unknown for significant periods of time. Ceridian may be also subject to various regulatory inquiries, such as information requests, and book and records examinations, from regulators and other authorities in the geographical markets in which Ceridian operates. A substantial liability arising from a lawsuit judgment or settlement or a significant regulatory action against Ceridian or a disruption in its business arising from adverse adjudications in proceedings against its directors, officers, or employees could have a material adverse effect on Ceridian's business, financial condition, and results or operations and ultimately the value of our investment in Ceridian.
Additionally, Ceridian is subject to claims and investigations as a result of its predecessor, Control Data Corporation (“CDC”), Ceridian Corporation, and other former entities for which Ceridian is successor-in-interest with respect to assumed liabilities. For example, in September 1989, CDC became party to an environmental matters agreement with Seagate Technology plc (“Seagate”) related to groundwater contamination on a parcel of real estate in Omaha, Nebraska sold by CDC to Seagate. In February 1988, CDC entered into an arrangement with Northern Engraving Corporation and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in relation to groundwater contamination at a site in Spring Grove, Minnesota. In August 2017, Ceridian received notice of a mesothelioma claim related to CDC. Although Ceridian is fully reserved for the groundwater contamination liabilities, Ceridian cannot at this time accurately assess the merits of these claims, and cannot be certain if additional liabilities related to such predecessor companies will surface. Moreover, even if Ceridian ultimately prevails in or settles any litigation, regulatory action, or investigation, Ceridian could suffer significant harm to its reputation, which could materially affect its ability to attract new customers, to retain current customers, and to recruit and to retain employees, which could have a material adverse effect on Ceridian's business, financial condition, and results of operations, and ultimately, the value of our investment in Ceridian.
Risks Relating to the Company's Investment in Dun & Bradstreet
Our investment in D&B may expose us to certain risks, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.
D&B’s transformation strategy is based on several strategic initiatives and growth strategies. The achievement of its strategic initiatives and growth strategies depends on a number of factors, including but not limited to its ability to maintain the integrity of its brand and reputation, client demand for its solutions, the effect of macro-economic challenges on its clients and vendors, its reliance on third parties to provide data and certain operational services and its ability to protect its information technology. D&B may not be able to successfully implement its strategic initiatives in accordance with its expectations, or in the timeframe it desires, which may result in us not realizing our expected return on our investment in D&B, or result in a negative return on investment.
We record our investment in D&B using the equity method of accounting, through which we record our proportionate share of their net earnings or loss in our consolidated financial statements. Equity-method investments are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. If our equity-method investment is not recoverable, we may be required to record an impairment charge, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We share certain directors with D&B or its affiliated entities, which may lead to conflicting interests.
One of our directors, William P. Foley, II, and our CEO and director, Richard N. Massey, also serve on the boards of directors of D&B or its parent and subsidiaries. From time to time, we may enter into transactions with D&B and/or its respective subsidiaries or other affiliates. There can be no assurance that the terms of any such transactions will be as favorable to our company, D&B or any of our or its respective subsidiaries or affiliates as would be the case where there is no overlapping director.
D&B's ability to implement and execute its strategic plans to transform the business may not be successful and, accordingly, D&B may not be successful in achieving its goals to transform its business, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
D&B may not be successful in developing and implementing its strategic plans to transform its businesses, including realigning management, simplifying and scaling technology, expanding and enhancing data and optimizing its client services. If the development or implementation of D&B's plans are not successful, they may not produce the revenue, margins, earnings or synergies that we expect, including offsetting the impact of adverse economic conditions that may exist currently or develop in the future. D&B may also face delays or difficulties in implementing technological, organizational and operational improvements, including its plans to leverage our data insights in new functional areas and utilize existing data architecture to generate high contribution incremental revenue streams, which could adversely affect its ability to successfully compete. In addition, the costs

17


associated with implementing such plans may be more than anticipated and D&B may not have sufficient financial resources to fund all of the desired or necessary investments required in connection with its plans. The existing and future execution of D&B's strategic and operating plans to transform its business will, to some extent, also be dependent on external factors that they cannot control. In addition, these strategic and operational plans need to be continually reassessed to meet the challenges and needs of its business in order for D&B to remain competitive. The failure to implement and execute its strategic and operating plans in a timely manner or at all, realize or maintain the cost savings or other benefits or improvements associated with such plans, have financial resources to fund the costs associated with such plans or incur costs in excess of anticipated amounts, or sufficiently assess and reassess these plans could have a material adverse effect on D&B's business, financial condition and results of operations, and ultimately the value of our investment in D&B.
D&B's brand and reputation are key assets and a competitive advantage, and its business may be affected by how it is perceived in the marketplace.
D&B's brand and reputation are key assets of its business and a competitive advantage. D&B's ability to attract and retain clients is highly dependent upon the external perceptions of its level of data quality, effective provision of solutions, business practices, including the actions of its employees, third-party providers, members of D&B's world-wide network of partners and other brand licensees, some of which may not be consistent with its policies and standards. Negative perception or publicity regarding these matters could damage D&B's reputation with clients and the public, which could make it difficult for it to attract and maintain clients. Adverse developments with respect to its industry may also, by association, negatively impact its reputation, or result in higher regulatory or legislative scrutiny. Negative perceptions or publicity could have a material adverse effect on D&B's business, financial condition and results of operations, and ultimately the value of our investment in D&B.
Data security and integrity are critically important to D&B's business, and cybersecurity incidents, including cyberattacks, breaches of security, unauthorized access to or disclosure of confidential information, business disruption, or the perception that confidential information is not secure, could result in a material loss of business, regulatory enforcement, substantial legal liability and/or significant harm to its reputation.
D&B collects, stores and transmits a large amount of confidential company information on over 355 million total businesses as of December 31, 2019, including financial information and personal information. D&B operates in an environment of significant risk of cybersecurity incidents resulting from unintentional events or deliberate attacks by third parties or insiders, which may involve exploiting highly obscure security vulnerabilities or sophisticated attack methods. These cyberattacks can take many forms, but they typically have one or more of the following objectives, among others:
obtain unauthorized access to confidential information;
manipulate or destroy data; or
disrupt, sabotage or degrade service on D&B's systems.
D&B has experienced and expects to continue to experience numerous attempts to access its computer systems, software, networks, data and other technology assets on a daily basis. The security and protection of its data is a top priority for D&B. D&B devotes significant resources to maintain and regularly upgrade the wide array of physical, technical and contractual safeguards that it employs to provide security around the collection, storage, use, access and delivery of information D&B has in its possession. Despite D&B's physical security, implementation of technical controls and contractual precautions to identify, detect and prevent the unauthorized access to and alteration and disclosure of its data, D&B cannot be certain that third party systems that have access to its systems will not be compromised or disrupted in the future, whether as a result of criminal conduct or other advanced, employee error or malfeasance, or other disruptions during the process of upgrading or replacing computer software or hardware, power outages, computer viruses, telecommunication or utility failures or natural disasters or other catastrophic events. Due to the sensitive nature of the information D&B collects, stores and transmits, it is not unusual for efforts to occur (coordinated or otherwise) by unauthorized persons to attempt to obtain access to its systems or data, or to inhibit D&B's ability to deliver products or services to a consumer or a business customer.
D&B must continually monitor and develop its information technology networks and infrastructure to prevent, detect, address and mitigate the risk of unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses and other events that could have a security impact. The preventive actions D&B takes to address cybersecurity risk, including protection of its systems and networks, may be insufficient to repel or mitigate the effects of cyberattacks as it may not always be possible to anticipate, detect or recognize threats to its systems, or to implement effective preventive measures against all cybersecurity risks. This is because, among other things:
the techniques used in cyberattacks change frequently and may not be recognized until after the attacks have succeeded;
cyberattacks can originate from a wide variety of sources, including sophisticated threat actors involved in organized crime, sponsored by nation-states, or linked to terrorist or hacktivist organizations; and
third parties may seek to gain access to our systems either directly or using equipment or security passwords belonging to employees, clients, third-party service providers or other users.

18


Although D&B has not incurred material losses or liabilities to date as a result of any breaches, unauthorized disclosure, loss or corruption of its data or inability of its clients to access its systems, such events could disrupt D&B's operations, subject it to substantial regulatory and legal proceedings and potential liability and fines, result in a material loss of business and/or significantly harm its reputation.
D&B may not be able to immediately address the consequences of a cybersecurity incident because a successful breach of its computer systems, software, networks or other technology assets could occur and persist for an extended period of time before being detected due to, among other things:
the breadth and complexity of its operations and the high volume of transactions that is processes;
the large number of clients, counterparties and third-party service providers with which D&B does business with;
the proliferation and increasing sophistication of cyberattacks; and
the possibility that a third party, after establishing a foothold on an internal network without being detected, might obtain access to other networks and systems.
The extent of a particular cybersecurity incident and the steps that D&B may need to take to investigate it may not be immediately clear, and it may take a significant amount of time before such an investigation can be completed and full and reliable information about the incident is known. While such an investigation is ongoing, D&B may not necessarily know the extent of the harm or how best to remediate it, and certain errors or actions could be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and remediated, any or all of which could further increase the costs and consequences of a cybersecurity incident.
Due to concerns about data security and integrity, a growing number of legislative and regulatory bodies have adopted breach notification and other requirements in the event that information subject to such laws is accessed by unauthorized persons and additional regulations regarding the use, access, accuracy and security of such data are possible. In the United States, we are subject to laws that provide for at least 50 disparate notification regimes. Complying with such numerous and complex regulations in the event of unauthorized access would be expensive and difficult, and failure to comply with these regulations could subject D&B to regulatory scrutiny and additional liability.
If D&B is unable to protect its computer systems, software, networks, data and other technology assets it could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations, and ultimately the value of our investment in D&B.
D&B's substantial indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and its ability to operate its business or react to changes in the economy or its industry, prevent them from fulfilling its obligations and could divert its cash flow from operations for debt payments.
D&B has a substantial amount of indebtedness, which requires significant interest and principal payments. As of December 31, 2019, D&B has $3,818.9 million in total long-term debt outstanding, consisting of borrowings under its senior secured credit facilities (the ‘‘New Senior Secured Credit Facilities’’), senior secured and unsecured notes (the ‘‘New Notes’’) and its repatriation bridge facility (the ‘‘New Repatriation Facility’’). In addition, subject to the limitations contained in the credit agreements governing D&B's New Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the indentures governing its New Notes, D&B may be able to incur substantial additional debt from time to time to finance working capital, capital expenditures, investments or acquisitions or for other purposes. If D&B does so, the risks related to its high level of debt could increase. This substantial amount of indebtedness could have important consequences to D&B, including the following:
it may be difficult for D&B to satisfy its obligations, including debt service requirements under its outstanding indebtedness;
D&B's ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions or other general corporate purposes may be impaired;
requiring a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on its indebtedness, thereby reducing D&B's ability to use its cash flow to fund its operations, capital expenditures, future business opportunities and other purposes;
D&B will be more vulnerable to economic downturns and adverse industry conditions and its flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in its business or industry will be more limited;
D&B's ability to capitalize on business opportunities and to react to competitive pressures, as compared to its competitors, may be compromised due to its high level of indebtedness and the restrictive covenants in its credit agreements and indentures;
D&B's ability to borrow additional funds or to refinance indebtedness may be limited; and

19


it may cause potential or existing clients or vendors to not contract with D&B due to concerns over its ability to meet its financial obligations.
Risks Relating to the Company's Corporate and Other Businesses 
Competition and technology may erode the Corporate and Other business franchises and result in lower earnings, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Each of the Corporate and Other businesses face intense competitive pressures within markets in which they operate. While we will manage our businesses with the objective of achieving long-term sustainable growth by developing and strengthening competitive advantages, many factors, including market and technology changes, may erode or prevent the strengthening of competitive advantages. Accordingly, future operating results will depend to some degree on whether our Corporate and Other businesses are successful in protecting or enhancing their competitive advantages. If our Corporate and Other businesses are unsuccessful in these efforts, our periodic operating results in the future may decline from current levels.
The Corporate and Other businesses, from time to time in the ordinary course of business, are involved in legal proceedings and may experience unfavorable outcomes, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Corporate and Other businesses, from time to time in the ordinary course of business, are involved in pending and threatened litigation matters, some of which include claims for punitive or exemplary damages. These companies are also subject to compliance with extensive government laws and regulations related to employment practices and policies. The Corporate and Other businesses may not be able to successfully resolve these types of conflicts to their satisfaction, and these matters may involve claims for substantial amounts of money or for other relief that might necessitate changes to their business or operations. The defense of these actions may be both time consuming and expensive and their outcomes cannot be predicted with certainty. Determining reserves for pending litigation is a complex, fact-intensive process that requires significant legal judgment. It is possible that unfavorable outcomes in one or more such proceedings could result in substantial payments that could have a material adverse effect on the Corporate and Other businesses' cash flows in a particular period or on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Failure to comply with, or changes in, laws or regulations applicable to the Corporate and Other businesses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Corporate and Other businesses will be subject to certain laws, such as certain environmental laws, takeover laws, anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws, escheat or abandoned property laws, and antitrust laws, that may impose requirements on us and them as an affiliated group. As a result, we could become jointly and severally liable for all or part of fines imposed on our Corporate and Other businesses or be fined directly for violations committed by these businesses, and such fines imposed directly on us could be greater than those imposed on such businesses. Compliance with these laws or contracts could also require us to commit significant resources and capital towards information gathering and monitoring thereby increasing our operating costs.
Similarly, the Corporate and Other businesses may be subject to contractual obligations which may impose obligations or restrictions on their affiliates. The interpretation of such contractual provisions will depend on local laws. Given that we do not control all of the Corporate and Other businesses and that they generally operate independently of each other, there is a risk that we could contravene one or more of such laws, regulations and contractual arrangements due to limited access and opportunities to monitor compliance. In addition, compliance with these laws or contracts could require us to commit significant resources and capital towards information gathering and monitoring thereby increasing our operating costs.
We need qualified personnel to manage and operate our Corporate and Other businesses, and any inability to adequately satisfy these needs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In our decentralized business model, we need qualified and competent management to direct day-to-day business activities of our Corporate and Other businesses. Our Corporate and Other businesses also need qualified and competent personnel in executing their business plans and serving their customers, suppliers and other stakeholders. Changes in demographics, training requirements and the unavailability of qualified personnel could negatively impact our Corporate and Other businesses' ability to meet demands of customers to supply goods and services. Recruiting and retaining qualified personnel is important to all of our Corporate and Other businesses' operations. Although our Corporate and Other businesses have adequate personnel for the current business environment, unpredictable increases in demand for goods and services may exacerbate the risk of not having sufficient numbers of trained personnel, which could have a negative impact on our operating results, financial condition and liquidity.

20


Risks Relating to the Company's Investments 
Our management may seek growth through acquisitions in lines of business that will not necessarily be limited to our current areas of focus or geographic areas. This expansion of our business subjects us to associated risks, such as the diversion of management's attention and lack of experience in operating such businesses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may make acquisitions in lines of business that are not directly tied to or synergistic with our current portfolio companies. Accordingly, we may in the future acquire businesses in industries or geographic areas with which management is less familiar than we are with our current businesses.
The acquisition and integration of any business we may acquire involves a number of risks and may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures in assimilating or integrating the businesses, technologies, products, personnel or operations of the acquired business. Furthermore, acquisitions may:
involve our entry into geographic or business markets in which we have little or no prior experience;
involve difficulties in retaining the customers of the acquired business; 
involve difficulties and expense associated with regulatory requirements, competition controls or investigations;
result in a delay or reduction of sales for both us and the business we acquire; and 
disrupt our ongoing business, divert our resources and require significant management attention that would otherwise be available for ongoing development of our current business.
To complete future acquisitions, we may determine that it is necessary to use a substantial amount of our cash or engage in equity or debt financing. If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock. Any debt financing obtained by us in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital-raising activities and other financial and operational matters that make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital in the future and to pursue other business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. In addition, we may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all, which could limit our ability to engage in acquisitions. Moreover, we can make no assurances that the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, such as operating improvements or anticipated cost savings, would be realized or that we would not be exposed to unexpected liabilities in connection with any acquisition.
Further, an acquisition may negatively affect our operating results because it may require us to incur charges and substantial debt or other liabilities, may cause adverse tax consequences, substantial depreciation and amortization of deferred compensation charges, may require the amortization, write-down or impairment of amounts related to deferred compensation, goodwill and other intangible assets, may include substantial contingent consideration payments or other compensation that reduce our earnings during the quarter in which incurred, or may not generate sufficient financial return to offset acquisition costs.
We may often pursue investment opportunities that involve business, regulatory, legal or other complexities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As an element of our investment strategy, we may pursue unusually complex investment opportunities. This could often take the form of substantial business, regulatory or legal complexity. Our tolerance for complexity may present risks, as such transactions can be more difficult, expensive and time-consuming to finance and execute; it may be more difficult to manage or realize value from the assets acquired in such transactions; and such transactions may sometimes entail a higher level of regulatory scrutiny or a greater risk of contingent liabilities. Any of these risks could harm our performance.
The loss of key personnel could impair our operating abilities and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success will substantially depend on our ability to attract and retain key members of our senior management team and officers. If we lose one or more of these key employees, our operating results and in turn the value of our common stock could be materially adversely affected. Although we will have employment agreements with many of our officers, there can be no assurance that the entire term of the employment agreement will be served or that the employment agreement will be renewed upon expiration.
The due diligence process that we undertake in connection with new acquisitions may not reveal all facts that may be relevant in connection with an investment.
Before making acquisitions, we will conduct due diligence that we deem reasonable and appropriate based on the facts and circumstances applicable to each investment. When conducting due diligence, we may be required to evaluate important and complex business, financial, tax, accounting, environmental and legal issues. Outside consultants, legal advisers, accountants and investment banks may be involved in the due diligence process in varying degrees depending on the type of investment. Nevertheless, when conducting due diligence and making an assessment regarding an acquisition, we will rely on the resources

21


available to us, including information provided by the target of the investment and, in some circumstances, third party investigations. The due diligence investigation that we will carry out with respect to any opportunity may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts (including fraud) that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating such opportunity. Moreover, such an investigation will not necessarily result in the investment being successful.
Risks Relating to the Split-Off
We may incur material costs as a result of our separation from FNF, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As a result of our separation from FNF, we have incurred and will continue to incur costs and expenses not previously incurred. These increased costs and expenses may arise from various factors, including financial reporting or costs associated with complying with the federal securities laws (including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tax administration and human resources related functions.) Although FNF will continue to provide many of these services for us at no-cost (other than reimbursement of FNF's out-of-pocket costs and expenses) under the corporate services agreement for up to three years following the Split-Off. The initial three-year term is set to expire in November 2020 and we are still evaluating our options for ongoing services currently provided by FNF. If the corporate services agreement is not mutually terminated by Cannae Holdings and FNF prior to the expiration of the initial three-year term, the corporate services agreement will automatically renew for successive one-year terms on mutually agreeable arm's length terms unless FNF and Cannae Holdings mutually agree to terminate the agreement. We cannot assure you that we will not incur third-party vendor costs or out-of-pocket expenses under the corporate services agreement that are material to our business. Moreover, we will have to develop internal departments/functions to perform the services at the end of the term of the corporate services agreement.
We share certain directors and officers with FNF, which may lead to conflicting interests.
Two of our executive officers, Richard L. Cox and Michael L. Gravelle, are also contracted to provide services or employed by FNF or FNF's subsidiaries and one of our directors, William P. Foley, II and one of our executive officers, Richard N. Massey, also serve on the boards of directors of FNF or its subsidiaries. Our executive officers and members of our board of directors have fiduciary duties to our stockholders. Likewise, any such persons who serve in similar capacities at FNF or any other public company have fiduciary duties to that company's stockholders. We also are party to a variety of related party agreements and relationships with FNF and certain of FNF's subsidiaries and FNF and subsidiaries of FNF have an ownership interest in Cannae Holdings. From time to time, we may enter into transactions with FNF and/or its respective subsidiaries or other affiliates. There can be no assurance that the terms of any such transactions will be as favorable to our company, FNF or any of our or its respective subsidiaries or affiliates as would be the case where there is no overlapping officer or director.
Our agreements with FNF were negotiated while we were a subsidiary of FNF.
We have a number of inter-company agreements covering matters such as tax sharing and our responsibility for certain liabilities previously undertaken by FNF for certain of our businesses. In addition, we have entered into (i) a corporate services agreement with FNF, pursuant to which FNF provides to us certain "back office" services at no-cost (other than reimbursement of FNF's out-of-pocket costs and expenses), (ii) a voting agreement with FNF, pursuant to which FNF agrees to appear or cause all shares of Cannae Holdings common stock that FNF or its subsidiaries, as applicable, own after the Split-Off to be counted as present at any meeting of the stockholders of Cannae Holdings, for the purpose of establishing a quorum, and agrees to vote all of such Cannae Holdings shares (or cause them to be voted) in the same manner as, and in the same proportion to, all shares voted by holders of Cannae Holdings common stock (other than FNF and its subsidiaries), (iii) a registration rights agreement, pursuant to which FNF or its subsidiaries, as applicable, received registration rights with respect to the shares in Cannae held by FNF and (iv) a revolver note with FNF, pursuant to which Cannae Holdings may borrow revolving loans, the proceeds of which may be used for investment purposes and working capital needs, from FNF from time to time in an aggregate amount not to exceed $100.0 million. The terms of all of these agreements were established while we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of FNF, and hence may not be the result of arm's length negotiations. We believe that the terms of these inter-company agreements are commercially reasonable and fair to all parties under the circumstances; however, conflicts could arise in the interpretation or any extension or renegotiation of the foregoing agreements after the Split-Off.
Risks Relating to the Company's Common Stock and the Securities Market 
Our charter, bylaws and provisions of Delaware law may discourage or prevent strategic transactions, including a takeover of our company, even if such a transaction would be beneficial to our stockholders.
Provisions contained in our charter and bylaws and provisions of the Delaware General Corporate Law ("DGCL"), could delay or prevent a third party from entering into a strategic transaction with us, as applicable, even if such a transaction would benefit our stockholders. For example, our charter and bylaws:
authorize the issuance of "blank check" preferred stock that could be issued by us upon approval of our board of directors to increase the number of outstanding shares of capital stock, making a takeover more difficult and expensive; 

22


provide that directors may be removed from office only for cause and that any vacancy on our board of directors may only be filled by a majority of our directors then in office, which may make it difficult for other stockholders to reconstitute our board of directors;
provide that special meetings of the stockholders may be called only upon the request of a majority of our board of directors or by our executive chairman, chief executive officer or president, as applicable; 
require advance notice to be given by stockholders for any stockholder proposals or director nominees; 
provide that directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by stockholders, which results in each director nominee elected by a plurality winning his or her seat upon receiving one "for" vote; and 
provide that the board of directors is divided into three classes, as nearly equal in number as possible, with one class being elected at each annual meeting of stockholders, which could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or discourage a third party from seeking to acquire, control of Cannae.
These restrictions and provisions could keep us from pursuing relationships with strategic partners and from raising additional capital, which could impede our ability to expand our business and strengthen our competitive position. These restrictions could also limit stockholder value by impeding a sale of our company.
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2.  
Properties
Our corporate headquarters are located in Las Vegas, Nevada in owned facilities.
Restaurant Group. The Restaurant Group's headquarters are located in Nashville, Tennessee with other office locations in Woburn, Massachusetts. The majority of the restaurants are leased from third parties, and are located in 40 states throughout the United States and Guam. Substantially all of our Restaurant Group's revenues are generated in those states.
Dun & Bradstreet. The principal executive offices of Dun & Bradstreet are located in a leased facility in Short Hills, New Jersey. As of December 31, 2019, D&B leases space in approximately 34 other locations including in Center Valley, Pennsylvania; Austin, Texas; Marlow, England; and Dublin, Ireland.
Ceridian. The principal executive offices of Ceridian are located in Minneapolis, Minnesota and Toronto, Ontario. As of December 31, 2019, Ceridian's principal computer and office facilities are located in the metropolitan areas of Minneapolis, Minnesota; Atlanta, Georgia; Los Angeles, California; Chicago, Illinois; St. Petersburg, Florida; St. Louis, Missouri; Honolulu, Hawaii; Louisville, Kentucky; in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Montreal, Quebec, Ottawa, Ontario, Calgary, Alberta, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada; and in Ebene, Mauritius.
Corporate and Other. The Golf & Real Estate segment of Cannae RE owns a 1,800 acre ranch-style luxury resort and residential community in Bend/Powell Butte, Oregon and an 18-hole championship golf facility located in Rock Creek, Idaho.
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings  
For a description of our legal proceedings see discussion under Legal and Regulatory Contingencies in Note M. Commitments and Contingencies to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Part I, Item 3.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
None.


23


PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company's common stock trades on The New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol "CNNE".
Performance Graph
Set forth below is a graph comparing cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock against the cumulative total return on the S&P 500 Index and against the cumulative total return of a peer group index consisting of certain companies against which we compete for the period ending December 31, 2019. The peer group comparison has been weighted based on their stock market capitalization. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100.00 on November 20, 2017, the date on which shares of our common stock began trading.
cnne2019a01.jpg
 
 
11/20/2017
12/31/2017
12/31/2018
12/31/2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cannae Holdings, Inc.
 
100.00

92.60

93.09

202.23

S&P 500
 
100.00

104.21

99.64

131.02

Peer Group (1)
 
100.00

105.94

88.08

126.33

(1) This peer group consists of the following companies: Apollo Global Management, LLC, Ares Capital Corporation, BlackRock, Inc., The Blackstone Group L.P., The Carlyle Group L.P., Compass Diversified Holdings, Jefferies Financial Group Inc., KKR & Co. Inc., and Qurate Retail Inc.

24


On January 31, 2020, the last reported sale price of our common stock on The New York Stock Exchange was $40.66 per share. We had approximately 5,556 shareholders of record.
Information concerning securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans will be included in Item 12 of Part III of this Annual Report.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
On September 19, 2019, our Board of Directors approved a new three-year stock repurchase program effective September 19, 2019 (the "2019 Repurchase Program") under which we may purchase up to 5 million shares of our common stock through September 30, 2022. We may make repurchases from time to time in the open market, in block purchases or in privately negotiated transactions, depending on market conditions and other factors. We repurchased 178,307 shares of our common stock during the year ended December 31, 2019 for approximately $4.9 million in the aggregate, or an average of $27.35 per share. From the original commencement of the 2019 Repurchase Program through market close on November 8, 2019, we repurchased a total of 178,307 common shares for approximately $4.9 million in the aggregate, or an average of $27.35 per share.
The following table summarizes repurchases of equity securities by Cannae during the year ending December 31, 2019:
Period
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased
 
Average Price Paid per Share
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)
 
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
9/1/2019 - 9/30/2019
 
145,000

 
$
27.31

 
145,000

 
4,855,000

10/1/2019 - 10/31/2019
 
33,307

 
27.53

 
33,307

 
4,821,693

Total
 
178,307

 
$
27.35

 
178,307

 
 
(1)
On September 19, 2019, our Board of Directors approved the 2019 Repurchase Program, under which we may purchase up to 5 million shares of our common stock through September 30, 2022.
(2)
As of the last day of the applicable month.
Item 6. 
Selected Financial Data
The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements and related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year amounts to conform with the 2019 presentation.
On December 31, 2019, we completed the T-System Contribution. As a result, we reclassified the results of operations of T-System as discontinued operations for years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and for all quarterly periods within those years.
On June 6, 2017, we closed on the sale of Digital Insurance, Inc. ("OneDigital") for $560.0 million in an all-cash transaction. The operations of One Digital are included in discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $276.0 million on the sale and $126.3 million in income tax expense, which are included in Net earnings from discontinued operations on the Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations for year ended December 31, 2017.
On September 28, 2015, we completed the distribution of J. Alexander's to FNFV shareholders. The results of J. Alexander's operations are included through the distribution date.
Summary Balance Sheet Data:
 
As of December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(in millions)
Balance Sheet Data:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
$
533.7

 
$
315.7

 
$
243.5

 
$
141.7

 
273.8

Total assets
2,092.2

 
1,459.5

 
1,487.2

 
1,473.3

 
1,469.5

Notes payable, long term
120.1

 
42.2

 
12.7

 
93.3

 
92.8

Equity
1,529.8

 
1,199.7

 
1,153.1

 
1,009.8

 
1,056.5


25


Summary Statement of Operations Data:
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
(in millions, except per share amounts)
Operating Data:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Operating revenue
$
1,070.0

 
$
1,147.5

 
$
1,156.6

 
$
1,178.4

 
$
1,414.7

Expenses:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Operating Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of restaurant revenues
912.8

 
991.3

 
991.0

 
984.1

 
1,195.2

Personnel costs
90.3

 
137.2

 
95.6

 
68.3

 
85.4

Depreciation and amortization
40.7

 
46.3

 
46.2

 
44.7

 
49.8

Other operating expenses, including asset impairments
133.4

 
91.8

 
101.3

 
83.5

 
96.4

Goodwill impairment
10.4

 
26.7

 

 

 

Total operating expenses
1,187.6

 
1,293.3

 
1,234.1

 
1,180.6

 
1,426.8

Operating loss
(117.6
)
 
(145.8
)
 
(77.5
)
 
(2.2
)
 
(12.1
)
Total other income, net
355.5

 
168.4

 
3.2

 
7.4

 
8.3

Earnings (loss) before income taxes, equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, and noncontrolling interest
237.9

 
22.6

 
(74.3
)
 
5.2

 
(3.8
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
24.2

 
15.0

 
(14.2
)
 
(10.4
)
 
(19.7
)
Earnings (loss) before equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
213.7

 
7.6

 
(60.1
)
 
15.6

 
15.9

Equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
(115.1
)
 
(16.1
)
 
3.4

 
(29.5
)
 
(26.0
)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax
98.6

 
(8.5
)
 
(56.7
)
 
(13.9
)
 
(10.1
)
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax
(51.8
)
 
(2.1
)
 
149.2

 
2.0

 
2.8

Net earnings (loss)
46.8

 
(10.6
)
 
92.5

 
(11.9
)
 
(7.3
)
Less: Net (loss) earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
(30.5
)
 
(38.2
)
 
(16.3
)
 
0.5

 
15.6

Net earnings (loss) attributable to Cannae Holdings
$
77.3

 
$
27.6

 
$
108.8

 
$
(12.4
)
 
$
(22.9
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Per Share Data:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Basic
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders (1)
$
1.77

 
$
0.42

 
$
(0.57
)
 
$
(0.21
)
 
$
(0.36
)
Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders (1)
(0.70
)
 
(0.03
)
 
2.11

 
0.03

 
0.04

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders (1)
$
1.07

 
$
0.39

 
$
1.54

 
$
(0.18
)
 
$
(0.32
)
Weighted average shares outstanding Cannae Holdings, basic basis (1)
72.2

 
71.2

 
70.6

 
70.6

 
70.6

Diluted
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders (1)
$
1.76

 
$
0.42

 
$
(0.57
)
 
$
(0.21
)
 
$
(0.36
)
Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders (1)
(0.69
)
 
(0.03
)
 
2.11

 
0.03

 
0.04

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders (1)
$
1.07

 
$
0.39

 
$
1.54

 
$
(0.18
)
 
$
(0.32
)
Weighted average shares outstanding Cannae Holdings, diluted basis (1)
72.4

 
71.3

 
70.6

 
70.6

 
70.6

Cash dividends paid per share Cannae Holdings common stock
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Book value per share Cannae Holdings (1)(2)
$
19.24

 
$
16.61

 
$
16.33

 
$
14.30

 
$
14.96

______________________________________
(1)
On November 17, 2017, the date of the consummation of the Split-Off, 70.6 million shares of our common stock were distributed to FNFV Group shareholders. For comparative purposes, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were calculated using the number of shares distributed as if those shares were issued and outstanding beginning January 1, 2015.
(2)
Book value per share is calculated as total equity at December 31 of each year presented divided by actual shares outstanding at December 31 of each year presented.

26


Summary Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited):
 
Quarter Ended
 
March 31,
 
June 30,
 
September 30,
 
December 31,
 
(in millions, except per share amounts)
2019:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Operating revenue
$
262.3

 
$
272.2

 
$
257.0

 
$
278.5

(Loss) earnings before income taxes, equity in (loss) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, and noncontrolling interest
(2.2
)
 
49.6

 
67.5

 
123.0

(Loss) earnings from continuing operations, net of tax
(17.6
)
 
21.4

 
44.1

 
50.7

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
(2.3
)
 
(2.5
)
 
(2.5
)
 
(44.5
)
Net (loss) earnings
(19.9
)
 
18.9

 
41.6

 
6.2

Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
(3.1
)
 
(4.5
)
 
(4.6
)
 
(18.3
)
Net (loss) earnings attributable to Cannae Holdings
$
(16.8
)
 
$
23.4

 
$
46.2

 
$
24.5

Per Share Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders
$
(0.20
)
 
$
0.36

 
$
0.69

 
$
0.92

Net loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.59
)
Basic (loss) earnings per share attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders
$
(0.24
)
 
$
0.33

 
$
0.65

 
$
0.33

Diluted
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (loss) earnings from continuing operations attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders
$
(0.20
)
 
$
0.36

 
$
0.69

 
$
0.91

Net loss from discontinued operations attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.58
)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders
$
(0.24
)
 
$
0.33

 
$
0.65

 
$
0.33

Cash dividends paid per share Cannae Holdings common stock
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

2018:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating revenue
$
277.0

 
$
287.5

 
$
279.4

 
$
303.6

(Loss) earnings before income taxes, equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates, and noncontrolling interest
(8.9
)
 
0.9

 
(11.9
)
 
42.5

(Loss) earnings from continuing operations, net of tax
(6.3
)
 
(21.8
)
 
(7.7
)
 
27.3

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
1.0

 
(0.6
)
 
(0.4
)
 
(2.1
)
Net (loss) earnings
(5.3
)
 
(22.4
)
 
(8.1
)
 
25.2

Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
(4.2
)
 
(2.6
)
 
(9.6
)
 
(21.8
)
Net (loss) earnings attributable to Cannae Holdings
$
(1.1
)
 
$
(19.8
)
 
$
1.5

 
$
47.0

Per Share Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (loss) earnings from continuing operations attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(0.27
)
 
$
0.03

 
$
0.69

Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders
$
0.01

 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(0.02
)
Basic (loss) earnings per share attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.28
)
 
$
0.02

 
$
0.67

Diluted
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (loss) earnings from continuing operations attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(0.27
)
 
$
0.03

 
$
0.69

Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders
$
0.01

 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(0.02
)
Diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to Cannae Holdings common shareholders
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.28
)
 
$
0.02

 
$
0.67

Cash dividends paid per share Cannae Holdings common stock
$

 
$

 
$

 
$



27


Item 7.  
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements and the Notes thereto and Selected Financial Data included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Overview
For a description of our business, including descriptions of segments, see the discussion under Business in Item 1 of Part I of this Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report.
Recent Developments
Dun & Bradstreet
In February 2019, we completed our previously announced investment in Dun & Bradstreet for a net investment of $505.6 million in D&B's ultimate parent. Dun & Bradstreet is a leading global provider of business decisioning data and analytics and provides various solutions to help companies improve their operational performance.
In June 2019, we made an additional pro-rata investment of $23.5 million in D&B's ultimate parent. D&B used the proceeds to partially fund its acquisition on July 1, 2019 of Lattice Engines, Inc., an artificial intelligence powered customer data platform used by business-to-business marketing and sales professionals.
Ceridian
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 9.0 million shares of common stock of Ceridian as part of three separate underwritten secondary public offerings by certain stockholders of Ceridian (the "Ceridian Share Sales"). In connection with the Ceridian Share Sales, we received aggregate proceeds of $477.9 million and recorded a gain of $342.1 million, which is included in Realized gains (losses), net on the Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations. The recorded gains are net of $21.2 million of losses (exclusive of $4.6 million of income tax benefit) related to reclassification adjustments from Other comprehensive earnings. As of December 31, 2019, we owned 16.4% of the outstanding common stock of Ceridian.
On February 21, 2020, we completed the sale of an additional 3.9 million shares of common stock of Ceridian to a broker pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933 and received proceeds of $283.7 million. As a result of the sale, we now own 19.8 million shares of Ceridian which represents 13.7% of its outstanding common stock.
Restaurant Group
Blue Ribbon and O'Charley's have entered into plans to sell certain company-owned stores. In conjunction with the plans to sell, $1.6 million and $9.3 million, respectively, of assets are recorded as held for sale and included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
On March 21, 2019, Blue Ribbon sold its corporate office located in Nashville, Tennessee for net cash proceeds of $13.2 million and entered into a lease agreement with the buyer to lease the office for an initial term of 15 years. The transaction was evaluated and determined not to qualify for sale-leaseback accounting. Accordingly, the transaction is accounted for as a failed sale and leaseback and a financing obligation. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we reclassified $2.4 million from assets held for sale formerly included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets to reflect the real estate assets in Property and equipment, net on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet as if we were the legal owner. We continue to recognize depreciation expense over the building's estimated useful life. On the date of the sale, we recorded a liability for the financing obligation in the amount of the net cash proceeds of $13.2 million, which is included in Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, long term on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet.
On December 13, 2019, O'Charley's and a third-party lessor partner closed on the exchange of certain company-owned stores (the "Transferred Properties") held by O'Charley's in exchange for properties owned by the lessor, and previously leased by O'Charley's to operate certain of its stores (the "O'Charley's Exchange"). In conjunction with the O'Charley's Exchange, O'Charley's obtained land with a fair value of $10.5 million and will lease back the Transferred Properties. We continue to account for $6.0 million of property associated with the Transferred Properties as if we were the legal owner which is included in Property and equipment, net on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet. The O'Charley's Exchange was evaluated and determined not to qualify for sale-leaseback accounting. Accordingly, the transaction is accounted for as a failed sale and leaseback and a financing obligation. On the date of the sale, O'Charley's recorded a liability for the financing obligation in the amount of the lease liability formerly recorded by O'Charley's for the Transferred Properties of $14.6 million, which is included in Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, long term on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, Blue Ribbon and O'Charley's also sold Blue Ribbon's corporate office located in Denver, Colorado and certain company-owned O'Charley's stores for total gross proceeds of $18.4 million.
On January 27, 2020, Blue Ribbon and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of

28


the United States Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Blue Ribbon Reorganization"). The Blue Ribbon Reorganization does not involve or affect the operations of O’Charley’s or 99 Restaurants, which are not part of Blue Ribbon.
Shortly before the Blue Ribbon Reorganization, Blue Ribbon closed 33 underperforming Village Inn and Bakers Square branded stores with 2019 revenue of $47.9 million and historical store-level operating losses.
T-System
On December 31, 2019, we completed our previously announced contribution of T-System Holdings, Inc. ("T-System") into a health care joint venture with an investment vehicle advised by an affiliate of Carlyle Investment Management, L.L.C. (“Carlyle”) and certain other investors with deep health care services experience (the "T-System Contribution"). The joint venture, Coding Solutions, plans to focus on acquiring, integrating and operating synergistic health care services companies in the provider and payer space. On the closing date, subsidiaries of Coding Solutions acquired two other healthcare services companies that provide (1) offshore medical coding solutions for the risk adjustment and provider markets and (2) domestic coding and clinical documentation services to providers.
As a result of the T-System Contribution, we received cash proceeds of $60.8 million for the repayment in full of debt loaned by our consolidated subsidiary to T-System and $14.5 million as consideration for a portion of our shares of T-System. We contributed the remainder of our equity interest in T-System for a 22.7% equity interest in Coding Solutions valued at $60.2 million.
We account for our investment in Coding Solutions under the equity method of accounting and the initial investment value of $60.2 million is included in Investments in unconsolidated affiliates on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2019.
QOMPLX
On July 23, 2019, Cannae Holdings, in partnership with Motive Partners, closed on an investment in preferred equity of QOMPLX, Inc. ("QOMPLX"), formerly Fractal Industries, Inc., an intelligent decision and analytics platform used by businesses for modeling and planning. We funded $15.0 million at close and funded an additional $15.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2019. $7.5 million of our investment made in the fourth quarter was for a note receivable convertible into preferred equity. Cannae's total preferred investment represents 18.8% of the outstanding voting equity of QOMPLX. Our Chairman William P. Foley II has joined QOMPLX’s Board of Directors.
Externalization
On August 27, 2019, we announced the execution of definitive documents for the Externalization, which became effective on September 1, 2019, pursuant to which the Company transitioned to an externally managed structure. In connection with the Externalization, the Company, Cannae LLC and the Manager, entered into the Management Services Agreement, which became effective September 1, 2019. The members of the Manager include certain directors and executive officers of the Company. Pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, certain services related to the management of the Company will be conducted by the Manager through the authority delegated to it in the Management Services Agreement and in accordance with the operational objectives and business plans approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. Subject at all times to the supervision and direction of the Board of Directors, the Manager will be responsible for, among other things, (a) managing the day-to-day business and operations of the Company and its subsidiaries, (b) evaluating the financial and operational performance of the Company's subsidiaries and other assets, (c) providing a management team to serve as some of the executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and (d) performing (or causing to be performed) any other services for and on behalf of the Company and its subsidiaries customarily performed by executive officers and employees of a public company.
Pursuant to the terms of the Management Services Agreement, Cannae LLC is obligated to pay the Manager a quarterly management fee equal to 0.375% (1.5% annualized) of the Company’s cost of invested capital (as defined in the Management Services Agreement) as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, payable in arrears in cash, as may be adjusted pursuant to the terms of the Management Services Agreement. Cannae LLC will be responsible for paying costs and expenses relating to the Company’s business and operations. Cannae LLC is required to reimburse the Manager for documented expenses of the Manager incurred on the Company’s behalf, including any costs and expenses incurred in connection with the performance of the services under the Management Services Agreement.
The Company conducts its business through Cannae LLC. In connection with the consummation of the Externalization, an Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Cannae LLC (the “Operating Agreement”) was entered into on August 27, 2019, by and among Cannae LLC and the Company, the Manager and Cannae Holdco, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, which became effective on September 1, 2019.
For so long as the Management Services Agreement is in effect, the Company, as managing member of Cannae LLC, authorizes the Manager to (a) designate officers of Cannae LLC and (b) perform, or cause to be performed, the services as are set forth in the Management Services Agreement.

29


In connection with such services, so long as Cannae LLC’s profits with respect to a liquidity event (sale or other disposition) involving an investment (as defined in the Operating Agreement) exceed an annualized hurdle rate of 8%, Cannae LLC is obligated to pay carried interest with respect to such investment to the Manager. Generally, where such hurdle is satisfied, carried interest will be paid to the Manager in an amount equal to: 15% of the profits on such investment (calculated as the proceeds of such investment less allocable management fees (as defined in the Operating Agreement) and the cost of such investment) for returns between 1.0x and 2.0x the cost of such investment (plus allocable management fees), and 20% of the profits on such investment for returns exceeding 2.0x the cost of such investment (plus allocable management fees). However, to the extent that, as of the liquidity event, the value of the portfolio of unrealized investments is less than the aggregate cost of such investments, the Manager’s carried interest entitlement will be correspondingly reduced until such time as the investment portfolio has recovered in value.
The Management Services Agreement has an initial term of five years, expiring on September 1, 2024. Pursuant to its terms, the Management Services Agreement will be automatically renewed for one-year terms thereafter unless earlier terminated by either the Company or the Manager in accordance with the terms of the Management Services Agreement.
The Company and Manager began paying fees associated with the Externalization beginning on November 1, 2019.
Equity Fund
On December 12, 2019, we entered into a limited partnership with an investment fund manager designed to opportunistically trade in marketable securities (the "Equity Fund"). We initially contributed $90.9 million of cash in exchange for limited partnership interests in the Equity Fund representing 49.0% of its outstanding equity and a deposit on hand with the Equity Fund. We and the other limited partners of the Equity Fund intend to make pro-rata investments through April 2020. We are committed to invest a total of $245.0 million. Subsequent to December 31, 2019, we invested an additional $100.0 million in the Equity Fund. As of December 31, 2019, $45.3 million of our contribution to the Equity Fund is held on deposit with the Equity Fund until such time as the general partner utilizes the funds and other limited partners make matching pro-rata contributions. The portion of our investment held on deposit is included in Prepaid expense and other current assets on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2019. We account for the $45.6 million of our investment that was contributed to the Equity Fund's capital under the equity method of accounting, and such portion is included in Investments in unconsolidated affiliates on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2019.
Other Developments
On September 18, 2019, our Board of Directors adopted a resolution increasing to nine the size of our Board of Directors, and elected Mark D. Linehan to serve on our Board of Directors. Mr. Linehan will serve in Class III of our Board of Directors, and his term will expire at the annual meeting of our shareholders to be held in 2020. Mr. Linehan has not been appointed to any committee of our Board.
On December 5, 2019, we completed a public offering of 7,475,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to a prospectus supplement, dated December 3, 2019, and the base prospectus, dated November 27, 2019, included in our registration statement on Form S-3 ASR (File No. 333-235303), which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 27, 2019. We received net proceeds from the Offering of approximately $236.0 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and capitalized offering expenses payable by us. We intend to use the net proceeds of the offering to fund future acquisitions, for working capital and general corporate purposes.
On December 24, 2019, we entered into an equity commitment letter with funds associated with Thomas H. Lee Partners L.P. ("THL") pursuant to which Cannae is committed to provide $125.0 million to a partnership (the “AmeriLife Joint Venture”) which will invest in the recapitalization of AmeriLife Group, LLC ("AmeriLife"). Cannae, THL and other investors will provide $617.0 million of aggregate equity financing to the AmeriLife Joint Venture to acquire AmeriLife. We have the option to syndicate a portion of our equity commitment prior to closing and expect to be a minority owner of the AmeriLife Joint Venture. The transaction is expected to close in the first or second quarter of 2020. AmeriLife is a leader in marketing and distributing life, health, and retirement solutions.
Related Party Transactions 
Our financial statements for all years presented reflect transactions with FNF. See Note R to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion.

30


Business Trends and Conditions 
Dun & Bradstreet
Businesses rely on business-to-business data and analytics providers to extract data-driven insights and make better decisions. For example, in commercial lending and trade credit, the scarcity of readily available credit history makes the extension of credit a time-consuming and imprecise process. In procurement, businesses face increasingly complex and global supply chains, making the assessment of compliance and viability of all suppliers prohibitively difficult and expensive if not conducted effectively. In sales and marketing, businesses have benefited from the proliferation of CRM, Marketing Automation and Sales Acceleration tools designed to help identify, track and improve both customer management and prospecting growth activities. While these tools are helping to fill sales funnels and improve the progression of opportunities, key challenges remain in salesforce productivity, effective client segmentation and marketing campaign activation. Common stumbling blocks include incorrect, or outdated, contact information, duplicated or inaccurate firmographic data and a lack of synchronization between the various platforms in the marketing technology ecosystem.
D&B helps its clients solve these mission critical business problems. D&B believes the total addressable market (‘‘TAM’’) in which it operates is large, growing and significantly underpenetrated. IDC estimates worldwide revenues of big data and analytics software to be approximately $67 billion in 2019. Within the broader market of data and analytics solutions, D&B serves a number of different markets, including the commercial credit data, sales and marketing data and Governance, Risk and Compliance markets. As D&B continues to drive innovation in its solutions, it expects to address a greater portion of this TAM as new use cases for its data assets and analytical capabilities are introduced.
D&B believes there are several key trends in the global macroeconomic environment generating additional growth in D&B's TAM and increasing the demand for its solutions, including, growing recognition by business of the value of analytics and data-informed business decisioning, growth in data creation and applications driven by the proliferation of new technologies with new data sets and applications, advances in analytical capabilities that are unlocking the value of data, and heightened compliance requirements in the regulatory environment for business driven by the growth of new technologies.
Ceridian
As of December 31, 2019, we own a 16.4% interest in Ceridian. Ceridian is a global company that offers a broad range of services and software designed to help employers more effectively manage employment processes, such as payroll, payroll related tax filing, human resource information systems, employee self-service, time and labor management, and recruitment and applicant screening. As a result of Ceridian's acquisition of Dayforce Corporation in 2012, which built Dayforce, a cloud HCM solution, Ceridian generally stopped actively selling its bureau solutions to new customers in the United States to focus its resources on expanding the Dayforce platform and growing cloud solutions. Through the year ended December 31, 2019, Ceridian’s cloud revenue is more than double its legacy bureau revenue and continues to grow.
    Over the last several years, a number of factors have significantly affected Ceridian’s results of operations, including its capital restructuring resulting from the initial acquisition by Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("THL") and FNFV, LLC of all of the outstanding equity of the Ceridian entities that was completed on November 9, 2007 (such acquisition, the "2007 Merger"), and the related interest expense, the accounting and purchase price allocations from the 2007 Merger, the acquisition in 2012 of the Dayforce legal entities, and Ceridian’s corporate restructuring following the 2013 separation of Ceridian HCM and Comdata. Other factors that have affected Ceridian’s results of operations over the last several years include the levels of customer trust funds held, transaction volumes, price increases, foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates (including interest earned on customer trust funds and interest expense on debt), customer employment levels, and its cost savings initiatives. Ceridian is subject to the risks arising from adverse changes in domestic and global economic conditions. Ceridian believes all of such factors may continue to significantly affect its results of operations.
Restaurant Group
       The restaurant industry is highly competitive and is often affected by changes in consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns; changes in general economic conditions; public safety conditions or concerns; demographic trends; weather conditions; the cost of food products, labor, energy and other operating costs; and governmental regulations. Higher labor costs due to state and local minimum wage increases and shopping pattern shifts to e-commerce and “ready to eat” grocery and convenience stores have had a negative impact on restaurant performance, particularly in the casual and family dining restaurants in which the company operates.
The restaurant industry is also characterized by high capital investments for new restaurants and relatively high fixed or semi-variable restaurant operating expenses.  Because of the high fixed and semi-variable expenses, changes in sales in existing restaurants are generally expected to significantly affect restaurant profitability because many restaurant costs and expenses are not expected to change at the same rate as sales.  Restaurant profitability can also be negatively affected by inflationary and regulatory increases in operating costs and other factors.  The most significant commodities that may affect our cost of food and beverage are beef, seafood, poultry, and dairy, which accounted for approximately half of our overall cost of food and beverage

31


in the past. Generally, temporary increases in these costs are not passed on to guests; however, in the past, we have adjusted menu prices to compensate for increased costs of a more permanent nature.
Average weekly sales per restaurant are typically higher in the first and fourth quarters than in other quarters, and we typically generate a disproportionate share of our earnings from operations in the first and fourth quarters. Holidays, severe weather and other disruptive conditions may impact sales volumes seasonally in some operating regions.
Our revenues in future periods will continue to be subject to these and other factors that are beyond our control and, as a result, are likely to fluctuate.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates 
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. See Note A to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for discussion our significant accounting policies.
The accounting policies and estimates described below are those we consider critical in preparing our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements. Management is required to make estimates and assumptions that can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures with respect to contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates.
Valuation of Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of identifiable net assets acquired and assumed in a business combination. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential impairment, through a comparison of fair value to the carrying amount. We have the option to first assess goodwill for impairment based on a review of qualitative factors to determine if events and circumstances exist which will lead to a determination that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, prior to performing a full fair-value assessment. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the quantitative impairment test is unnecessary. However, we conclude otherwise, then we are required to perform the quantitative impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing the fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit. Goodwill impairment, if any, is measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value.
We allocate goodwill to reporting units based on the reporting unit expected to benefit from the business combination. We evaluate our reporting units on at least an annual basis and, if necessary, reassign goodwill using a relative fair value allocation approach. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) annually in the fourth quarter (October 1) and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. These events or circumstances could include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, operating performance indicators, competition, or sale or disposition of a significant portion of a reporting unit.
We use a combination of discounted cash flow analyses and market approaches to determine the fair value of each of our reporting units. Our discounted cash flow projections include assumptions for growth rates for revenues, costs and earnings, which are based on various long-range financial and operational plans of each reporting unit. Additionally, discount rates used in our goodwill analysis are based on weighted-average cost of capital, driven by comparable public companies, the prevailing interest rates, credit ratings, financing abilities and opportunities of each reporting unit, among other factors. Our market-based valuations utilize earnings multiples of comparable public companies, which are reflective of the market in which each respective reporting unit operates, and recent comparable market transactions. Changes in the factors used in our fair value estimates, including declines in industry or company-specific sales, margin erosion, discount rates used, and market multiples could have a significant impact on the fair values of the reporting units.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded $35.1 million of impairment to goodwill in our former T-System segment and $10.4 million of impairment to goodwill in our Restaurant Group segment as a result of our annual goodwill impairment testing. The impairment charge in our Restaurant Group is a result of deteriorating operating results and cash flow resulting from declining same store sales and increased costs, primarily in our Village Inn and Bakers Square branded stores. As a result of the goodwill impairment in the Restaurant Group, the fair value of this reporting unit approximates its carrying value and relatively small decreases in future forecasts or changes in other assumptions could result in additional goodwill impairment. The impairment in our former T-System segment is primarily a result of a decline in earnings multiples from comparable public companies and lower forecasted cash flows for its reporting units. The impairments recorded were calculated as the deficit between the carrying value of the reporting units of each segment compared to the fair value of the reporting unit determined by performing a combination of discounted cash flow and market approaches.

32


Impairment to goodwill in our former T-System segment is included in Net loss from discontinued operations on the Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019. See Note N to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded $26.7 million of impairment to goodwill in our Restaurant Group segment. The impairment charge was a result of deteriorating operating results and cash flow resulting from declining same store sales and increased costs. The impairment recorded was calculated as the deficit between the carrying value of a reporting unit of the Restaurant Group segment compared to the fair value of the reporting unit determined by performing a combination of discounted cash flow and market approaches.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, we determined that there were no events or circumstances which indicated that the carrying value of goodwill exceeded the fair value and no impairment was recorded.
Valuation of Other Intangible Assets. We have other intangible assets, not including goodwill, which consist primarily of customer relationships and contracts, trademarks and tradenames that are generally recorded in connection with acquisitions at their fair value, franchise rights, the fair value of purchased software and capitalized software development costs. Intangible assets with estimable lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. In general, customer relationships are amortized over their estimated useful lives using an accelerated method, which takes into consideration expected customer attrition rates. Contractual relationships are generally amortized over their respective contractual lives. Useful lives of computer software range from 3 to 10 years. Trademarks and tradenames are generally considered intangible assets with indefinite lives and are reviewed for impairment at least annually. Capitalized software development costs and purchased software are recorded at cost and amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful life.
Our primary indefinite-lived other intangible assets are the tradenames of our Restaurant Group brands. Tradenames are tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter (October 1) and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a tradename below its carrying value. We use a relief from royalty method to determine the fair value of our tradenames, which includes assumptions for growth rates for revenues, tax rates, discount rates and royalty rates. Changes in the factors used in our fair value estimates, including declines in industry or company-specific sales, discount rates used, and royalty rates could have a significant impact on the fair values of our tradenames.
We recorded $17.1 million of impairment expense related to the Village Inn and Bakers square tradenames within our Restaurant Group in the year ended December 31, 2019. We recorded $5.8 million of impairment expense related to a tradename and an abandoned software project in our Restaurant Group in the year ended December 31, 2018. We recorded $2.9 million of impairment expense related to a tradename in our Restaurant Group in the year ended December 31, 2017. The impairments are recorded within Other operating expenses on our Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations for the years then ended.
During our 2019 other intangible impairment testing of the Restaurant Group's O'Charley's tradename, we determined that the excess of the fair value of the tradename over its book value was nominal. Given that the fair value is not substantially in excess of the book value, relatively small decreases in future revenues from forecasted results or changes in royalty rates or other assumptions could result in impairment of the tradename.
Accounting for Income Taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities and expected benefits of utilizing net operating loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The impact of changes in tax rates and laws on deferred taxes, if any, is applied to the years during which temporary differences are expected to be settled and reflected in the financial statements in the period enacted.
Refer to Note L to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion of our accounting for income taxes.
Certain Factors Affecting Comparability 
Year ended December 31, 2019. On December 31, 2019, we completed the T-System Contribution. As a result of the T-System Contribution, we reclassified the results of operations of T-System to discontinued operations for all periods presented in our Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations.
Year ended December 31, 2017. On June 6, 2017, we closed on the sale of OneDigital for $560.0 million in an all-cash transaction. As a result of the sale of OneDigital, we reclassified the results of operations of OneDigital to discontinued operations in our Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.

33


Results of Operations
 Consolidated Results of Operations
 Net earnings.  The following table presents certain financial data for the years indicated:
 
Year ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
(In millions)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
Restaurant revenue
$
1,043.3

 
$
1,117.8

 
$
1,129.0

Other operating revenue
26.7

 
29.7

 
27.6

Total operating revenues
1,070.0

 
1,147.5

 
1,156.6

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of restaurant revenue
912.8

 
991.3

 
991.0

Personnel costs
90.3

 
137.2

 
95.6

Depreciation and amortization
40.7

 
46.3

 
46.2

Other operating expenses, including asset impairments
133.4

 
91.8

 
101.3

Goodwill impairment
10.4

 
26.7

 

Total operating expenses
1,187.6

 
1,293.3

 
1,234.1

Operating loss
(117.6
)
 
(145.8
)
 
(77.5
)
Other income (expense):
 
 
 
 
 
Interest, investment and other income
15.6

 
6.3

 
5.3

Interest expense
(17.8
)
 
(4.7
)
 
(7.0
)
Realized gains, net
357.7

 
166.8

 
4.9

Total other income
355.5

 
168.4

 
3.2

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
237.9

 
22.6

 
(74.3
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
24.2

 
15.0

 
(14.2
)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
213.7

 
7.6

 
(60.1
)
Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
(115.1
)
 
(16.1
)
 
3.4

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
98.6

 
(8.5
)
 
(56.7
)
Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax
(51.8
)
 
(2.1
)
 
149.2

Net earnings (loss)
46.8

 
(10.6
)
 
92.5

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
(30.5
)
 
(38.2
)
 
(16.3
)
Net earnings attributable to Cannae Holdings, Inc. common shareholders
$
77.3

 
$
27.6

 
$
108.8

Revenues 
Total revenue in 2019 decreased $77.5 million compared to 2018, primarily driven by a decline in revenue in the Restaurant Group segment. Total revenue in 2018 decreased $9.1 million compared to 2017, primarily driven by a decline in revenue in our Restaurant Group segment.
The change in revenues from our segments is discussed in further detail at the segment level below.
Expenses
Our operating expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, cost of restaurant revenue, other operating expenses, and depreciation and amortization.
Personnel costs include base salaries, commissions, benefits, stock-based compensation and bonuses paid to employees, and are one of our most significant operating expenses. Personnel costs that are directly attributable to the operations of the Restaurant Group are included in Cost of restaurant revenue.  
Cost of restaurant revenue includes cost of food and beverage, primarily the costs of beef, groceries, produce, seafood, poultry and alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, net of vendor discounts and rebates, payroll and related costs and expenses directly relating to restaurant level activities, and restaurant operating costs including occupancy and other operating expenses at the restaurant level.

34


Other operating expenses include professional fees, advertising costs, travel expenses and impairments of operating assets.
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of our depreciation related to investments in property and equipment as well as amortization of intangible assets.
The change in expenses from our segments is discussed in further detail at the segment level below. 
Income tax expense (benefit) on continuing operations was $24.2 million, $15.0 million, and $(14.2) million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was 10.2%, 66.4%, and 19.1%, respectively. The change in the effective tax rate in 2019 from 2018 is primarily attributable to the decreased impact of non-deductible executive compensation on pretax income, partially offset by the increased impact of equity losses from unconsolidated affiliates. The increase in the effective tax rate in 2018 from 2017 is primarily attributable to the change in tax laws disallowing the tax deductibility of certain executive compensation. The fluctuation in income tax benefit as a percentage of earnings from continuing operations before income taxes is attributable to our estimate of ultimate income tax liability and changes in the characteristics of net earnings year to year, such as the weighting of operating income versus investment income.
For a detailed breakout of our effective tax rate and further discussion on changes in our taxes, see Note L to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.
Other
Net realized gains totaled $357.7 million, $166.8 million, and $4.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The net realized gain for the year ended December 31, 2019 is primarily attributable to $342.1 million of gains on the Ceridian Share Sales and $3.9 million of gains on sales of property in the Restaurant Group. The net realized gain for the year ended December 31, 2018 is primarily attributable to a $92.6 million gain on the sale of Ceridian shares in the fourth quarter of 2018, $63.2 million of realized gains associated with Ceridian's initial public offering and the gain of $24.0 million on the sale of LifeWorks, partially offset by impairment losses of $12.5 million recognized on fixed maturity securities in the 2018 period. The net realized gain for the year ended December 31, 2017 is primarily attributable to the sale of equity securities available for sale.
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates for the periods indicated consisted of the following (in millions):
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
Ceridian
$
16.4

 
$
(20.5
)
 
$
1.9

Dun & Bradstreet
(132.8
)
 

 

Other
1.3

 
4.4

 
1.5

Total
$
(115.1
)
 
$
(16.1
)
 
$
3.4

Net Earnings
Net earnings attributable to Cannae increased $49.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to 2018. Total net earnings attributable to Cannae decreased $81.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to 2017.
The change in net earnings is attributable to the factors discussed above and net earnings from the segments is discussed in further detail at the segment level below.

35


Segment Results of Operations
Restaurant Group
The following table presents the results from operations of our Restaurant Group segment:
 
Year ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
(In millions)
Revenues:
 

 
 
 
 
Restaurant revenue
$
1,043.3

 
$
1,117.8

 
$
1,129.0

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of restaurant revenue
912.8

 
991.3

 
991.0

Personnel costs
52.1

 
47.3

 
52.8

Depreciation and amortization
38.5

 
44.9

 
43.6

Other operating expenses, including asset impairments
108.9

 
86.3

 
71.1

Goodwill impairment
10.4

 
26.7

 

Total operating expenses
1,122.7

 
1,196.5

 
1,158.5

Operating loss
(79.4
)
 
(78.7
)
 
(29.5
)
Other expense:
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
(5.4
)
 
(16.0
)
 
(6.6
)
Realized gains and losses, net
3.9

 
(2.1
)
 

Total other expense
(1.5
)
 
(18.1
)
 
(6.6
)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates
(80.9
)
 
(96.8
)
 
(36.1
)
Total revenues for the Restaurant Group segment decreased $74.5 million, or 6.7%, in the year ended December 31, 2019 from 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by decreased revenue related to the closing or sale of 48 company-owned restaurants primarily associated with our O'Charley's, Village Inn and Bakers Square concepts in 2019 and to a lesser extent a decrease in comparable store sales. The decrease was partially offset by increases in the average guest check. Total revenues for the Restaurant Group segment decreased $11.2 million, or 1.0%, in the year ended December 31, 2018 from 2017. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in restaurant sales, primarily driven by closed restaurants, decreased comparable store sales and guest counts overall, partially offset by increases in bakery sales.
Comparable Store Sales. One method we use in evaluating the performance of our restaurants is to compare sales results for restaurants period over period. A new restaurant is included in our comparable store sales figures starting in the first period following the restaurant's first seventy-eight weeks of operations. Changes in comparable store sales reflect changes in sales for the comparable store group of restaurants over a specified period of time. This measure highlights the performance of existing restaurants, as the impact of new restaurant openings is excluded. Comparable store sales for our 99 Restaurants brand changed (0.4)% and 2.6% in the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, from the prior fiscal years. The decrease in 2019 is primarily attributable to lower guest counts partially offset by an increase in the average guest check. Comparable store sales for our O' Charley's brand decreased 2.5% and 2.9% in the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, from the prior fiscal years. Comparable store sales for our Blue Ribbon brands changed as follows for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, from the prior fiscal years: Village Inn decreased 1.7% and 0.4%, respectively, and Bakers Square changed 3.4% and (0.9)%, respectively. The decrease in both periods at O' Charley's and Village Inn is primarily attributable to decreased guest counts partially offset by an increase in the average guest check. The increase at Bakers Square in 2019 is attributable to increased average guest check, partially offset by a reduction in guest counts.
Other operating expenses increased by $22.6 million, or 26.2%, in the year ended December 31, 2019 from 2018. Other operating expenses increased by $15.2 million, or 21.4%, in the year ended December 31, 2018 from 2017. The increase in both periods is primarily attributable to impairments of other intangible assets and lease assets.
Cost of restaurant revenue decreased $78.5 million, or 7.9%, in the year ended December 31, 2019 from 2018. Cost of restaurant revenue increased $0.3 million, or less than 1.0%, in the year ended December 31, 2018 from 2017. Cost of restaurant revenue as a percentage of restaurant revenue were approximately 87.5%, 88.7%, and 87.8% in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The decrease in cost of restaurant revenue as a percentage of restaurant revenues was primarily driven by the closure of underperforming stores with lower margins and higher operating expenses in 2019. The increase in cost of restaurant

36


revenue as a percentage of restaurant revenue in 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily attributable to increased cost of food and labor.
See Note A to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion of goodwill impairments in our Restaurant Group.
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes decreased $15.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 from 2018. Loss from continuing operations before income taxes increased $60.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 from 2017. The change in losses is primarily attributable to the factors discussed above.
Ceridian
We own a 16.4% economic interest in Ceridian. We account for our investment in Ceridian under the equity method of accounting; therefore, its results of operations do not consolidate into ours. Details relating to the results of operations of Ceridian (NYSE: "CDAY") can be found in its periodic filings with the SEC. The audited financial statements of Ceridian can also be found at Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report.
Dun & Bradstreet
We own a 24.3% economic interest in Dun & Bradstreet's ultimate parent. We account for our investment in D&B under the equity method of accounting; therefore, its results of operations do not consolidate into ours. The audited financial statements of Dun & Bradstreet's ultimate parent are expected be filed as an amendment to this Annual Report when available.
Summarized financial information is presented below for the ultimate parent of Dun & Bradstreet for the relevant dates and time periods included in Investments in unconsolidated affiliates and Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates in our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations, respectively. Our net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2019, include our equity in Dun & Bradstreet’s losses for the period from February 8, 2019, the date we made our initial investment in D&B, through December 31, 2019.
 
December 31,
2019
 
(In millions)
Total current assets
$
418.6

Goodwill and other intangible assets, net
8,091.9

Other assets
602.1

Total assets
$
9,112.6

 
 
Current liabilities
$
1,090.4

Long-term debt
3,818.9

Other non-current liabilities
1,595.9

Total liabilities
6,505.2

Preferred equity
1,030.6

Total capital
1,576.8

Total liabilities and equity
$
9,112.6

 
Year ended December 31, 2019
 
(In millions)
Total revenues
$
1,413.9

Loss before income taxes
(540.0
)
Net loss
(425.8
)
Dividends attributable to preferred equity and noncontrolling interest expense
(120.5
)
Net loss attributable to Dun & Bradstreet
(546.3
)

37


Corporate and Other
The Corporate and Other segment consists of our share in the operations of certain controlled portfolio companies and other equity investments, activity of the corporate holding company and certain intercompany eliminations and taxes.
The following table presents the results from operations of our Corporate and Other segment:
 
Year ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
(In millions)
Revenues:
 

 
 
 
 
Other operating revenue
$
26.7

 
$
29.7

 
$
27.6

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Personnel costs
38.2

 
89.9

 
42.8

Depreciation and amortization
2.2

 
1.4

 
2.6

Other operating expenses
24.5

 
5.5

 
30.2

Total operating expenses
64.9

 
96.8

 
75.6

Operating loss
(38.2
)
 
(67.1
)
 
(48.0
)
Other income (expense):
 
 
 
 
 
Interest, investment and other income
15.6

 
6.3

 
5.3

Interest (expense) income
(12.4
)
 
11.3

 
(0.4
)
Realized gains and losses, net
353.8

 
168.9

 
4.9

Total other income
357.0

 
186.5

 
9.8

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates
318.8

 
119.4

 
(38.2
)
Personnel costs decreased $51.7 million, or 57.5%, in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018, and increased $47.1 million, or 110.1%, in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017. The change in both periods is primarily driven by a change in investment success bonuses paid related to investment monetization events.
Other operating expenses increased $19.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018, and decreased $24.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017. The change in both periods is primarily attributable to the inclusion of a $14.8 million elimination of intercompany fees charged to the Restaurant Group in 2018.
Interest and investment income increased $9.3 million, or 147.6%, in the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018. The increase was primarily attributable to $9.1 million of syndication fees earned in relation to our organization of investors for the D&B Acquisition.
Interest expense in the year ended December 31, 2019 consists primarily of interest on our corporate debt instruments. See Note K to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion of our outstanding debt. Interest expense in the year ended December 31, 2018 consists primarily of eliminations of previously outstanding intercompany debt with our Restaurant Group and T-System.
Net realized gains for the year ended December 31, 2019 is primarily attributable to $342.1 million of gains on the Ceridian Share Sales. Net realized gain for the year ended December 31, 2018 is primarily attributable to a $92.6 million gain on the sale of Ceridian shares in the fourth quarter of 2018, $63.2 million of realized gains associated with Ceridian's initial public offering and the gain of $24.0 million on the sale of LifeWorks, partially offset by impairment losses of $12.5 million recognized on fixed maturity securities in 2018. The net realized gain for the year ended December 31, 2017 is primarily attributable to the sale of equity securities available for sale.
Discontinued Operations
As a result of the T-System Contribution and sale of OneDigital, the financial results of T-System and OneDigital have been reclassified to discontinued operations. See Note N to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further details on amounts included in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Requirements.  Our current cash requirements include personnel costs, operating expenses, taxes, payments of interest and principal on our debt, capital expenditures, and business acquisitions. There are no restrictions on our retained earnings regarding our ability to pay dividends to stockholders, although there are limits on the ability of certain subsidiaries to pay dividends

38


to us, as a result of provisions in certain debt agreements. The declaration of any future dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Additional uses of cash flow are expected to include stock repurchases, acquisitions, and debt repayments.
As of December 31, 2019, we had cash and cash equivalents of $533.7 million, $0.5 million of short-term investments and $325.0 million of available borrowing capacity under our existing holding company credit facilities. On February 18, 2020, we repaid the remaining $75.0 million outstanding under the Margin Facility and terminated the Amended Loan Agreement. Accordingly, we have no borrowing capacity and all of the Company's holdings of Ceridian common stock have been released from the first priority lien under the Margin Facility. As of February 18, 2020, we have $100.0 million of available borrowing capacity under our existing holding company credit facilities.
We continually assess our capital allocation strategy, including decisions relating to reducing debt, repurchasing our stock, and/or conserving cash. We believe that all anticipated cash requirements for current operations will be met from internally generated funds, cash dividends from subsidiaries, cash generated by investment securities, potential sales of non-strategic assets, and borrowings on existing credit facilities. Our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements are monitored regularly to ensure that we can meet our cash requirements. We forecast the needs of all of our subsidiaries and periodically review their short-term and long-term projected sources and uses of funds, as well as the asset, liability, investment and cash flow assumptions underlying such forecasts.
We are focused on evaluating our assets and investments as potential vehicles for creating liquidity. Our intent is to use that liquidity for general corporate purposes, including, potentially reducing debt, repurchasing shares of our stock, other strategic initiatives and/or conserving cash.
Operating Cash Flows. Our cash flows used in operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 were $84.2 million, $22.9 million and $90.7 million, respectively. The increase in cash used in operations of $61.3 million from 2019 to 2018 is primarily attributable to the cash outflow related to amounts on deposit with the Equity Fund. The remainder of the variance is attributable to the timing of payment and receipt of accounts payable and receivable. The increase in cash provided by operations of $67.8 million from 2018 to 2017 is primarily attributable to decreased taxes paid of $117.5 million in 2018 compared to 2017, partially offset by cash provided by discontinued operations of $17.3 million in 2017, increased cash bonus expenses of $26.4 million in 2018, and decreased consolidated pretax loss (increased earnings) in 2018. The remainder of the variance is attributable to the timing of payment and receipt of accounts payable and receivable.
Investing Cash Flows. Our cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 were $(24.2) million, $186.7 million and $91.7 million, respectively. The decrease in cash provided by investing activities of $210.9 million from 2019 to 2018 is primarily attributable to the D&B Acquisition and other investments, partially offset by proceeds from the Ceridian Share Sales net sales of short term investments. The increase in cash provided by (decrease in cash used in) investing activities of $95.0 million from 2018 to 2017 is primarily attributable to proceeds from the sale of Ceridian shares and LifeWorks in 2018, and decreased outflow for acquisitions in 2018 compared to 2017, partially offset by net purchases of short term investments in 2018 and the sale of One Digital in 2017.
Capital Expenditures. Total capital expenditures for property and equipment and other intangible assets were $28.3 million, $15.9 million and $40.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Capital expenditures in 2019 and 2018 primarily consisted of purchases of property and equipment in our Restaurant Group segment and property improvements at our real estate operations. The increase in expenditures in 2019 compared to 2018 is reflective of an increase in expenditures in our real estate operations, capital expenditures for new stores and maintenance at 99 Restaurants and store maintenance expenditures at O'Charley's, partially offset by a decrease in capital expenditures at Blue Ribbon. The decrease in expenditures in 2018 compared to 2017 is reflective of a decrease in spending in our Restaurant Group segment and decreased spending at OneDigital due to its sale in June 2017.
Financing Cash Flows. Our cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 were $319.1 million, $(86.4) million and $98.2 million, respectively. The increase in cash provided by (decrease in cash used in) financing activities of $405.5 million from 2019 compared to 2018 is primarily attributable to proceeds from our registered offering of shares of our common stock in December 2019 and an increase in net borrowings (net of repayments) in 2019. The decrease in cash provided by (increase in cash used in) financing activities of $184.6 million from 2018 to 2017 is primarily attributable to the payoff of Blue Ribbon's external debt and decreased borrowings in 2018.
Financing Arrangements. In our Restaurant Group, financing arrangements are used both as part of its companies' overall capitalization structure as well as to fund purchases of seasonal inventory in advance of sales. For a description of our historical financing arrangements see Note K to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.
       Contractual Obligations. Our long term contractual obligations generally include our credit agreements and other debt facilities, lease payments on certain of our premises and equipment and purchase obligations of the Restaurant Group.

39


See Note B to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report for further discussion of our leasing arrangements.
See Note A to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report which is incorporated by reference into this Item 2 of Part I, for further discussion of Blue Ribbon and O'Charley's financing obligations associated with its corporate headquarters and certain of its O'Charley's branded stores and our future obligations to pay our Manager fees under the terms of the Management Services Agreement. Management fees payable to our Manager are based on our cost of invested capital of $923.3 million as of December 31, 2019.
Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable, are legally binding and specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. The Restaurant Group has unconditional purchase obligations with various vendors, primarily related to food and beverage obligations with fixed commitments in regards to the time period of the contract and the quantities purchased with annual price adjustments that can fluctuate. Future purchase obligations are estimated by assuming historical purchase activity over the remaining, non-cancellable terms of the various agreements. For agreements with minimum purchase obligations, at least the minimum amounts we are legally required to purchase are included. These agreements do not include fixed delivery terms. We used both historical and projected volume and pricing as of December 31, 2019 to determine the amount of the obligations.
     As of December 31, 2019, our required annual payments relating to these contractual obligations were as follows:
 
2020
 
2021
 
2022
 
2023
 
2024
 
Thereafter
 
Total
 
 
Unconditional purchase obligations
$
181.9

 
$
74.2

 
$
15.1

 
$
10.3

 
$
9.3

 
$
10.6

 
$
301.4

Operating lease payments
56.1

 
51.3

 
40.8

 
34.0

 
23.8

 
97.3

 
303.3

Notes payable
9.0

 
7.1

 
82.1

 
19.8

 
0.7

 
9.4

 
128.1

Management fees payable to Manager
13.9

 
13.9

 
13.9

 
13.9

 
11.6

 

 
67.2

Restaurant Group financing obligations
3.0

 
3.0

 
3.1

 
3.1

 
3.1

 
25.6

 
40.9

Total
$
263.9

 
$
149.5

 
$
155.0

 
$
81.1

 
$
48.5


$
142.9

 
$
840.9

Capital Stock Transactions. For information on our 2019 Repurchase Program, see discussion under the header Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer included in Item 5 of Part II of this Annual Report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We do not engage in off-balance sheet activities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements 
For a description of recent accounting pronouncements, see Note S to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.
Item 7A. 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Commodity Price Risk
In our Restaurant Group segment, we are exposed to market price fluctuations in beef, seafood, produce and other food product prices. Given the historical volatility of beef, seafood, produce and other food product prices, these fluctuations can materially impact the food and beverage costs incurred in our Restaurant Group segment. While our Restaurant Group companies have taken steps to qualify multiple suppliers who meet our standards as suppliers for our restaurants and have entered into agreements with suppliers for some of the commodities used in our restaurant operations, there can be no assurance that future supplies and costs for such commodities will not fluctuate due to weather and other market conditions outside of our control. Consequently, such commodities can be subject to unforeseen supply and cost fluctuations. Dairy costs can also fluctuate due to government regulation. Because we typically set our menu prices in advance of our food product prices, our menu prices cannot immediately take into account changing costs of food items. To the extent that we are unable to pass the increased costs on to our guests through price increases, our results of operations would be adversely affected. We do not use financial instruments to hedge our risk to market price fluctuations in beef, seafood, produce and other food product prices at this time.
 


40


Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 
Page
Number


41


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Cannae Holdings, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Cannae Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated and combined financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, of the Company and our report dated February 28, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph related to a change in accounting principle for leases due to the adoption of FASB ASC 842, Leases, on January 1, 2019.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
February 28, 2020

42


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Cannae Holdings, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated and combined balance sheets of Cannae Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated and combined statements of operations, comprehensive earnings, equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditors, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We did not audit the consolidated financial statements of Ceridian HCM Holdings, Inc. (“Ceridian”), the Company's investment in which is accounted for by use of the equity method. The accompanying financial statements of the Company include its equity investment in Ceridian of $309.5 million and $359.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and its equity in earnings (losses) in Ceridian of $16.4 million, $(20.5) million and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Ceridian, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 28, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Notes B and S to the financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases due to the adoption of FASB ASC 842, Leases, on January 1, 2019.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits and the report of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - Restaurant Group Segment - Refer to Notes A, F, and H to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company’s evaluation of goodwill and indefinite lived trademarks and tradename intangible assets (“tradenames”) for impairment involves the comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit or tradename to their respective carrying value.

43


The Company determines the fair value of its reporting units using a combination of discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analyses and market approaches. The Company determines the fair value of its tradenames using the relief from royalty (“RFR”) method. The determination of fair value using a DCF analysis, the market approach, and the RFR method requires management to make significant assumptions and estimates related to forecasts of future growth rates for revenues, costs, and earnings (collectively the “forecasts”), discount rates, earnings multiples, and royalty rates.
The Company’s goodwill and tradenames balances as of December 31, 2019 totaled $66.1 million and $52.1 million, respectively, and are related to the reporting units within the Restaurant Group segment.
The fair value of one reporting unit within the Restaurant Group segment was below its carrying value as of the annual measurement date, and therefore, the Company recorded a $10.4 million impairment. As a result of this goodwill impairment the fair value of this reporting unit approximates its carrying value and relatively small decreases in future forecasts or changes in other assumptions could result in additional goodwill impairment. The fair value of the Village Inn and Bakers Square tradenames within the Restaurant Group segment were below their respective carrying values, and therefore, the Company recorded $17.1 million of impairments in the period ended December 31, 2019. The fair value of the O'Charley's tradename within the Restaurant Group segment exceeded its carrying value as of the annual measurement date, however, relatively small decreases in future forecasts or changes in royalty rates or other assumptions could result in impairment of the tradename.
Management’s forecasts for this reporting unit and these tradenames involves significant management assumptions and estimates due to deteriorating operating results and cash flows resulting from declining same store sales and increased costs. Therefore, auditing the forecasts for this reporting unit and these tradenames and the related valuation methodologies, discount rate, earnings multiples, and royalty rate valuation assumptions involved a higher degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity as well as an increased level of audit effort, including the involvement of valuation specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the Company’s forecasts and the selection of the valuation methodologies, discount rate, earnings multiples, and royalty rate valuation assumptions for this reporting unit and these tradenames included the following:
We tested the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over goodwill and tradenames, including internal controls over management’s forecasts and the selection of the valuation methodologies, discount rates, earnings multiples, and royalty rates.
We assessed the sensitivity of the Company’s impairment conclusions to changes in the forecasts, discount rates, earnings multiples, and royalty rates.
We evaluated management’s ability to accurately forecast by comparing actual results to management’s historical forecasts.
We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s forecasts by: (1) comparing the forecasts to historical results; (2) obtaining supporting evidence for assumptions and estimates related to management’s planned operational initiatives and restructurings that were incorporated into the forecasts; (3) corroborating assumptions and estimates with management’s communications to the Board of Directors; and (4) comparing forecast assumptions and estimates with information included in Company press releases, analyst reports of the Company and companies in its peer group, and restaurant industry reports.
With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we evaluated the valuation methodologies, discount rates, earnings multiples, and royalty rates selected by management, by assessing the impact of the uncertainty in management's forecast due to deteriorating operating results and cash flows on these valuation assumptions, testing the underlying market-based source information and the mathematical accuracy of the valuation assumptions, and developing a range of independent valuation assumptions and comparing those to the discount rate, earnings multiples, and royalty rate valuation assumptions selected by management.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
February 28, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.


44


CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS
 
December 31,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
 (in millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
$
533.7

 
$
315.7

Short-term investments
0.5

 
31.4

Trade receivables
16.0

 
30.4

Inventory
16.3

 
22.3

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
64.4

 
22.1

Current assets of discontinued operations - see Note N

 
29.8

Total current assets
630.9

 
451.7

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
836.5

 
397.2

Lease assets - see Note B
192.9

 

Property and equipment, net
162.6

 
175.5

Other intangible assets, net
63.1

 
92.4

Goodwill
66.1

 
76.5

Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value
19.2

 
17.8

Deferred tax assets
54.5

 
23.8

Other long term investments and noncurrent assets
66.4

 
48.2

Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations - see Note N

 
176.4

Total assets
$
2,092.2

 
$
1,459.5

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
 

 
 

Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, current
$
86.4

 
$
95.6

Lease liabilities, current - see Note B
41.5

 

Income taxes payable
37.4

 
24.3

Deferred revenue, current
26.4

 
25.8

Notes payable, current
7.0

 
5.9

Current liabilities of discontinued operations - see Note N

 
8.4

Total current liabilities
198.7

 
160.0

Lease liabilities, long-term - see Note B
199.7

 

Deferred revenue, long-term

 

Notes payable, long-term
120.1

 
42.2

Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, long-term
43.9

 
57.1

Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations - see Note N

 
0.5

Total liabilities
562.4

 
259.8

Commitments and contingencies - see Note M


 


Equity:
 

 
 
Cannae common stock, $0.0001 par value; authorized 115,000,000 shares as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018; issued of 79,727,972 and 72,234,330 shares as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively; and outstanding of 79,516,833 and 72,223,692 shares as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively

 

Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, none as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018

 

Retained earnings
143.6

 
45.8

Additional paid-in capital
1,396.7

 
1,146.2

Less: Treasury stock, 211,139 and 10,638 shares as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, at cost
(5.9
)
 
(0.2
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(45.9
)
 
(67.2
)
Total Cannae shareholders' equity
1,488.5

 
1,124.6

Noncontrolling interests
41.3

 
75.1

Total equity
1,529.8

 
1,199.7

Total liabilities and equity
$
2,092.2

 
$
1,459.5


See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements


45


CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Year ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
 (in millions)

Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
Restaurant revenue
$
1,043.3

 
$
1,117.8

 
$
1,129.0

Other operating revenue
26.7

 
29.7

 
27.6

Total operating revenues
1,070.0

 
1,147.5

 
1,156.6

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of restaurant revenue
912.8

 
991.3

 
991.0

Personnel costs
90.3

 
137.2

 
95.6

Depreciation and amortization
40.7

 
46.3

 
46.2

Other operating expenses, including asset impairments
133.4

 
91.8

 
101.3

Goodwill impairment
10.4

 
26.7

 

Total operating expenses
1,187.6

 
1,293.3

 
1,234.1

Operating loss
(117.6
)
 
(145.8
)
 
(77.5
)
Other income (expense):
 
 
 
 
 
Interest, investment and other income
15.6

 
6.3

 
5.3

Interest expense
(17.8
)
 
(4.7
)
 
(7.0
)
Realized gains, net
357.7

 
166.8

 
4.9

Total other income
355.5

 
168.4

 
3.2

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
237.9

 
22.6

 
(74.3
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
24.2

 
15.0

 
(14.2
)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
213.7

 
7.6

 
(60.1
)
Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
(115.1
)
 
(16.1
)
 
3.4

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
98.6

 
(8.5
)
 
(56.7
)
Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax - see Note N
(51.8
)
 
(2.1
)
 
149.2

Net earnings (loss)
46.8

 
(10.6
)
 
92.5

Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
(30.5
)
 
(38.2
)
 
(16.3
)
Net earnings attributable to Cannae Holdings, Inc. common shareholders
$
77.3

 
$
27.6

 
$
108.8

 
 
 
 
 
 
Amounts attributable to Cannae Holdings, Inc. common shareholders
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Cannae Holdings, Inc. common shareholders
$
127.6

 
$
29.5

 
$
(40.4
)
Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations attributable to Cannae Holdings, Inc. common shareholders
(50.3
)
 
(1.9
)
 
149.2

Net earnings attributable to Cannae Holdings, Inc. common shareholders
$
77.3

 
$
27.6

 
$
108.8

Earnings per share
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
$
1.77

 
$
0.42

 
$
(0.57
)
Net (loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations
(0.70
)
 
(0.03
)
 
2.11

Net earnings per share
$
1.07

 
$
0.39

 
$
1.54

Diluted
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
$
1.76

 
$
0.42

 
$
(0.57
)
Net (loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations
(0.69
)
 
(0.03
)
 
2.11

Net earnings per share
$
1.07

 
$
0.39

 
$
1.54

 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding Cannae Holdings common stock, basic basis
72.2

 
71.2

 
70.6

Weighted average shares outstanding Cannae Holdings common stock, diluted basis
72.4

 
71.3

 
70.6

See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements

46


CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
(in millions)
Net earnings (loss)
$
46.8

 
$
(10.6
)
 
$
92.5

Other comprehensive earnings (loss), net of tax:
 
 
 

 
 

Unrealized gain (loss) on investments and other financial instruments, net (excluding investments in unconsolidated affiliates) (1)
0.1

 
0.9

 
(8.7
)
Unrealized gain (loss) relating to investments in unconsolidated affiliates (2)
7.1

 
(12.0
)
 
8.9

Reclassification of unrealized losses on investments in unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax, included in net earnings (3)
19.1

 
24.0

 

Reclassification of unrealized losses (gains) on investments and other financial instruments, net of tax, included in net earnings (4)

 
7.0

 
(3.1
)
Other comprehensive earnings (loss)
26.3

 
19.9

 
(2.9
)
Comprehensive earnings
73.1

 
9.3

 
89.6

Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
(30.5
)
 
(38.2
)
 
(16.3
)
Comprehensive earnings attributable to Cannae
$
103.6

 
$
47.5

 
$
105.9


(1)
Net of income tax expense (benefit) of less than $0.1 million, $0.3 million and $(3.1) million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(2)
Net of income tax expense (benefit) of $1.9 million, $(3.2) million and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(3)
Net of income tax benefit of $5.1 million and $6.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
(4)
Net of income tax (benefit) expense of $(1.9) million and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements



47


CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
 
Common Stock
 
Parent Investment in FNFV
 
Additional Paid-in Capital
 
Retained Earnings
 
Accumulated Other Comp (Loss) Earnings
 
Treasury Stock
 
Non-controlling
Interests
 
Total
Equity
 
Shares
 
$
 
 
 
 
 
Shares
 
$
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)

Balance, December 31, 2016

 
$

 
$
961.6

 
$

 
$

 
$
(68.1
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
116.3

 
$
1,009.8

Other comprehensive earnings — unrealized loss on investments and other financial instruments, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 
(8.7
)
 

 

 

 
(8.7
)
Other comprehensive earnings — unrealized gain on investments in unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 
8.9

 

 

 

 
8.9

Reclassification adjustments for unrealized gains and losses included in net earnings

 

 

 

 

 
(3.1
)
 

 

 

 
(3.1
)
Stock-based compensation

 

 

 
0.2

 

 

 

 

 
0.3

 
0.5

Issuance of restricted stock
0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sale of OneDigital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(6.2
)
 
(6.2
)
Contribution of CSA services from FNF


 

 

 
0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 
0.1

Ceridian stock-based compensation

 

 

 
5.7

 

 

 

 

 

 
5.7

Net change in Parent investment in FNFV

 

 
(46.0
)
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(46.0
)
Subsidiary dividends paid to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(0.4
)
 
(0.4
)
FNF investment
5.7

 

 

 
100.0

 

 

 

 

 

 
100.0

FNF contribution of FNFV
64.9

 

 
(1,024.2
)
 
1,024.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss)

 

 
108.6

 

 
0.2

 

 

 

 
(16.3
)
 
92.5

Balance, December 31, 2017
70.9

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,130.2

 
$
0.2

 
$
(71.0
)
 

 
$

 
$
93.7

 
$
1,153.1

Adjustment for cumulative effect of adoption of ASC Topic 606

 

 

 

 
1.9

 

 

 

 

 
1.9

    Adjustment for adoption of ASU 2018-02

 

 

 

 
16.1

 
(16.1
)
 

 

 

 

Reclassification of unrealized losses on investments in unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax, included in net earnings

 

 

 

 

 
24.0

 

 

 

 
24.0

Reclassification of unrealized losses on investments and other financial instruments, net of tax, included in net earnings


 

 

 

 

 
7.0

 

 

 

 
7.0

Other comprehensive earnings — unrealized gain on investments and other financial instruments, net of tax


 

 

 

 

 
0.9

 

 

 

 
0.9

Other comprehensive earnings — unrealized losses of investments in unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax


 

 

 

 

 
(12.0
)
 

 

 

 
(12.0
)
Stock-based compensation


 

 

 
2.0

 

 

 

 

 

 
2.0

Issuance of restricted stock
0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares withheld for taxes and in treasury

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(0.2
)
 

 
(0.2
)
Shares issued for investment success bonuses, net of issuance costs
1.0

 

 

 
19.8

 

 

 

 

 

 
19.8

Contribution of CSA services from FNF


 

 

 
1.3

 

 

 

 

 

 
1.3

Ceridian stock-based compensation


 

 

 
6.5

 

 

 

 

 

 
6.5

Restaurant Group Restructuring

 

 

 
(13.6
)
 

 

 

 

 
15.6

 
2.0

Subsidiary dividends paid to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(0.1
)
 
(0.1
)
Sale of noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiary


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
4.1

 
4.1

Net earnings (loss)


 

 

 

 
27.6

 

 

 

 
(38.2
)
 
(10.6
)
Balance, December 31, 2018
72.2

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,146.2

 
$
45.8

 
$
(67.2
)
 

 
$
(0.2
)
 
$
75.1

 
$
1,199.7

Adjustment for cumulative effect of adoption of accounting standards by unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

 

 

 

 
20.5

 
(5.0
)
 

 

 

 
15.5

Other comprehensive earnings — unrealized gain on investments and other financial instruments, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 
0.1

 

 

 

 
0.1

Other comprehensive earnings — unrealized earnings of investments in unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 
7.1

 

 

 

 
7.1

Reclassification of unrealized losses on investments in unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax, included in net earnings

 

 

 

 

 
19.1

 

 

 

 
19.1

Proceeds from equity offering, net of offering costs
7.5

 

 

 
236.0

 

 

 

 

 

 
236.0

Dun & Bradstreet equity issuance costs

 

 

 
(1.4
)
 

 

 

 

 

 
(1.4
)
Treasury stock repurchases

 

 

 

 

 

 
0.2

 
(4.9
)
 

 
(4.9
)
Shares withheld for taxes and in treasury

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(0.8
)
 

 
(0.8
)
Stock-based compensation, consolidated subsidiaries

 

 

 
4.0

 

 

 

 

 
0.6

 
4.6

Contribution of CSA services from FNF

 

 

 
1.3

 

 

 

 

 

 
1.3

Stock-based compensation, unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 
10.6

 

 

 

 

 

 
10.6

Deconsolidation of T-System

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(2.9
)
 
(2.9
)
Subsidiary dividends paid to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(1.0
)
 
(1.0
)
Net earnings (loss)

 

 

 

 
77.3

 

 

 

 
(30.5
)
 
46.8

Balance, December 31, 2019
79.7

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,396.7

 
$
143.6

 
$
(45.9
)
 
0.2

 
$
(5.9
)
 
$
41.3

 
$
1,529.8

See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.

48


CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
Year ended December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
(in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings (loss)
$
46.8

 
$
(10.6
)
 
$
92.5

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
            Depreciation and amortization
54.5

 
61.3

 
58.1

            Equity in losses (earnings) of unconsolidated affiliates
115.1

 
16.1

 
(3.4
)
            Distributions from investments in unconsolidated affiliates
2.0

 
1.4

 

            Realized gains, net
(354.1
)
 
(182.7
)
 
(4.9
)
            Loss (gain) on sale of consolidated subsidiaries
6.4

 

 
(276.0
)
            Impairment of assets
90.8

 
55.2

 
9.9

            Lease asset amortization
38.8

 

 

            Stock-based compensation cost
4.6

 
21.8

 
0.5

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
 
 
 
 
 
Net decrease (increase) in trade receivables
18.2

 
(7.3
)
 
(1.2
)
Net (increase) decrease in inventory, prepaid expenses and other assets
(36.2
)
 
9.5

 
(12.2
)
Net increase in accounts payable, accrued liabilities, deferred revenue and other
8.4

 
0.9

 
15.0

Net decrease in lease liabilities
(46.9
)
 

 

Net change in income taxes
(32.6
)
 
11.5

 
31.0

Net cash used in operating activities
(84.2
)
 
(22.9
)

(90.7
)
Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from sale of equity securities

 
17.7

 
31.6

Proceeds from sale of Ceridian shares
477.9

 
152.5

 

Proceeds from sale of LifeWorks

 
56.2

 

Additions to property and equipment and other intangible assets
(28.3
)
 
(15.9
)
 
(40.1
)
Purchases of investment securities

 
(3.5
)
 
(1.3
)
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
(45.7
)
 

 
(1.4
)
Investments in Dun & Bradstreet, net of capitalized syndication fees
(526.1
)
 

 

Proceeds from the sale of other investments
4.8

 
7.8

 
1.3

Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment
21.4

 
4.9

 

Purchases of other long-term investments
(30.0
)
 
(7.4
)
 
(4.3
)
Distributions from investments in unconsolidated affiliates
1.0

 
0.4

 
1.1

Net proceeds from (purchases of) short term investments
30.9

 
(31.4
)
 

Net other investing activities
3.0

 
0.1

 
1.4

Acquisition of T-System, net of cash acquired

 
0.7

 
(201.6
)
Cash proceeds from the T-System Contribution, net of cash transferred - see Note A
66.9

 

 

Proceeds from sale of OneDigital

 
4.6

 
326.0

Other acquisitions/disposals of businesses, net of cash acquired/disposed

 

 
(21.0
)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
(24.2
)
 
186.7


91.7

Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
367.3

 
33.9

 
84.4

Debt service payments
(290.8
)
 
(124.1
)
 
(35.8
)
Equity offering proceeds, net of capitalized costs
236.0

 

 

Sale of noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiary

 
4.1

 

Proceeds from FNF Investment

 

 
100.0

Subsidiary distributions paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders
(0.9
)
 
(0.1
)
 
(0.4
)
Payment of contingent consideration for prior period acquisitions

 

 
(4.0
)
Proceeds from Blue Ribbon sale and leaseback of corporate office, net of issuance costs - see Note A
13.2

 

 

Payment for shares withheld for taxes and in treasury

(0.8
)
 
(0.2
)
 

Purchases of treasury stock
(4.9
)
 

 

Equity transactions with Parent, net

 

 
(46.0
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
319.1

 
(86.4
)

98.2

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
210.7

 
77.4


99.2

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period, including cash of discontinued operations
323.0

 
245.6

 
146.4

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period, including cash of discontinued operations
$
533.7

 
$
323.0


$
245.6


See Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements


49


CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note A.
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The following describes the significant accounting policies of Cannae Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “we,” “us,” “our,” "Cannae," or the "Company”) which have been followed in preparing the accompanying Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements.
Description of Business
We are a holding company engaged in actively managing and operating a group of companies and investments, as well as making additional majority and minority equity portfolio investments in businesses, in order to achieve superior financial performance and maximize the value of these assets. Our primary investments as of December 31, 2019 include our minority ownership interests in The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation ("Dun & Bradstreet" or "D&B") and Ceridian HCM Holding, Inc.; majority equity ownership stakes in O'Charley's Holdings, LLC ("O'Charley's") and 99 Restaurants Holdings, LLC ("99 Restaurants"); and various other controlled portfolio companies and minority equity and debt investments.
See Note Q Segment Information for further discussion of the businesses comprising our reportable segments.
Split-off of Cannae from FNF
On November 17, 2017, Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (“FNF”) redeemed each outstanding share of its FNF Ventures ("FNFV") Group common stock, par value $0.0001, for one share of common stock, par value $0.0001, of a newly formed entity, Cannae (the "Split-Off"). In conjunction with the Split-Off, FNF contributed to us its portfolio of investments unrelated to its primary insurance and real estate operations, which included majority and minority equity investment stakes in a number of entities and certain fixed income investments. On November 20, 2017, Cannae common stock began “regular-way” trading on The New York Stock Exchange under the “CNNE” stock symbol.
Following the Split-Off, FNF and Cannae operate as separate, publicly-traded companies. In connection with the Split-Off, FNF and Cannae entered into certain agreements in order to govern certain of the ongoing relationships between the two companies after the Split-Off and to provide for an orderly transition. These agreements include a reorganization agreement, a corporate services agreement, a registration rights agreement, a voting agreement and a tax matters agreement.
The reorganization agreement provides for, among other things, the principal corporate transactions (including the internal restructuring) required to effect the Split-Off, certain conditions to the Split-Off and provisions governing the relationship between Cannae and FNF with respect to and resulting from the Split-Off. The tax matters agreement provides for the allocation and indemnification of tax liabilities and benefits between FNF and Cannae and other agreements related to tax matters. The voting and registration rights agreements provide for certain appearance and voting restrictions and registration rights on shares of Cannae owned by FNF after consummation of the Split-Off. Pursuant to the corporate services agreement (the "CSA"), FNF will provide Cannae with certain "back office" services including legal, tax, accounting, treasury and investor relations support. FNF will generally provide these services at no-cost for up to three years. Cannae will reimburse FNF for direct, out-of-pocket expenses incurred by FNF in providing these services.
The Split-Off was accounted for at historical cost due to the pro rata nature of the distribution to holders of FNFV Group common stock.
Principles of Consolidation and Combination and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP") and include the historical accounts as well as wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries of the Company. Prior to the Split-Off, these financial statements represent a combination of the historical financial information of the operations attributed to FNFV, of which Cannae is comprised. The Company is allocated certain corporate overhead and management services expenses from FNF based on the terms of the CSA and our proportionate share of the expense determined on actual usage and our best estimate of management's allocation of time. Both FNF and Cannae believe such allocations are reasonable; however, they may not be indicative of the actual results of operations or cash flows of the Company had the Company been operating as an independent, publicly traded company for the periods presented or the amounts that will be incurred by the Company in the future.
All intercompany profits, transactions and balances have been eliminated. Certain of our investments in non-majority-owned partnerships and affiliates are accounted for using the equity method until such time that they may become wholly or majority-owned. Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests are recorded on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations relating to majority-owned subsidiaries with the appropriate noncontrolling interest that represents the portion of equity not related to our ownership interest recorded on the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets in each period.

50

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Management Estimates
The preparation of these Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates made by management include the carrying amount and depreciation of property and equipment (Note E), the valuation of acquired intangible assets (Note H), fair value measurements (Note C), and accounting for income taxes (Note L). Actual results could differ from estimates.
Recent Developments
Dun & Bradstreet
In February 2019, we completed our previously announced investment in Dun & Bradstreet for a net investment of $505.6 million in D&B's ultimate parent. Dun & Bradstreet is a leading global provider of business decisioning data and analytics and provides various solutions to help companies improve their operational performance.
In June 2019, we made an additional pro-rata investment of $23.5 million in D&B's ultimate parent. D&B used the proceeds to partially fund its acquisition on July 1, 2019 of Lattice Engines, Inc. ("Lattice"), an artificial intelligence powered customer data platform used by business-to-business marketing and sales professionals.
See Note D for further discussion of our accounting for our investment in D&B.
Ceridian
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we completed the sale of an aggregate of 9.0 million shares of common stock of Ceridian as part of three separate underwritten secondary public offerings by certain stockholders of Ceridian (the "Ceridian Share Sales"). In connection with the Ceridian Share Sales, we received aggregate proceeds of $477.9 million and recorded a gain of $342.1 million, which is included in Realized gains (losses), net on the Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations. The recorded gains are net of $21.2 million of losses (exclusive of $4.6 million of income tax benefit) related to reclassification adjustments from Other comprehensive earnings. As of December 31, 2019, we owned 16.4% of the outstanding common stock of Ceridian.
On February 21, 2020, we completed the sale of an additional 3.9 million shares of common stock of Ceridian to a broker pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933 and received proceeds of $283.7 million. As a result of the sale, we now own 19.8 million shares of Ceridian which represents 13.7% of its outstanding common stock.
Restaurant Group
On January 27, 2020, American Blue Ribbon Holdings, LLC ("Blue Ribbon") and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Blue Ribbon Reorganization"). The Blue Ribbon Reorganization does not involve or affect the operations of O’Charley’s or 99 Restaurants, which are not part of Blue Ribbon. See Note M for further discussion.
Blue Ribbon has entered into plans to sell certain company-owned stores. In conjunction with the plans to sell, $1.6 million and $9.3 million, respectively, of assets are recorded as held for sale and included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets, net as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
On March 21, 2019, Blue Ribbon sold its corporate office located in Nashville, Tennessee for net cash proceeds of $13.2 million and entered into a lease agreement with the buyer to lease the office for an initial term of 15 years. The transaction was evaluated and determined not to qualify for sale-leaseback accounting. Accordingly, the transaction is accounted for as a failed sale and leaseback and a financing obligation. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we reclassified $2.4 million from assets held for sale formerly included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets to reflect the real estate assets in Property and equipment, net on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet as if we were the legal owner. We continue to recognize depreciation expense over the building's estimated useful life. On the date of the sale, Blue Ribbon recorded a liability for the financing obligation in the amount of the net cash proceeds of $13.2 million, which is included in Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, long term on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet.
On December 13, 2019, O'Charley's and a third-party lessor partner closed on the exchange of certain company-owned stores (the "Transferred Properties") held by O'Charley's in exchange for properties owned by the lessor, and previously leased by O'Charley's to operate certain of its stores (the "O'Charley's Exchange"). In conjunction with the O'Charley's Exchange, O'Charley's obtained land with a fair value of $10.5 million and will lease back the Transferred Properties. We continue to account for $6.0 million of property associated with the Transferred Properties as if we were the legal owner which is included in Property and equipment, net on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet. The O'Charley's Exchange was evaluated and determined not

51

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





to qualify for sale-leaseback accounting. Accordingly, the transaction is accounted for as a failed sale and leaseback and a financing obligation. On the date of the sale, O'Charley's recorded a liability for the financing obligation in the amount of the lease liability formerly recorded by O'Charley's for the Transferred Properties of $14.6 million, which is included in Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, long term on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, Blue Ribbon and O'Charley's sold Blue Ribbon's corporate office located in Denver, Colorado and certain company-owned O'Charley's stores for total gross proceeds of $18.4 million.
T-System
On December 31, 2019, we completed our previously announced contribution of T-System Holdings, Inc. ("T-System") into a health care joint venture with an investment vehicle advised by an affiliate of Carlyle Investment Management, L.L.C. (“Carlyle”) and certain other investors with deep health care services experience (the "T-System Contribution"). The joint venture, Coding Solutions Topco, Inc. (“Coding Solutions”) will focus on acquiring, integrating and operating synergistic health care services companies in the provider and payer space. On the closing date, subsidiaries of Coding Solutions acquired two other healthcare services companies that provide (1) offshore medical coding solutions for the risk adjustment and provider markets and (2) domestic coding and clinical documentation services to providers.
As a result of the T-System Contribution, Cannae received cash proceeds of $60.8 million for the repayment in full of debt loaned by a consolidated subsidiary of Cannae to T-System and $14.5 million as consideration for a portion of its shares of T-System. Cannae contributed the remainder of its equity interest in T-System for a 22.7% equity interest in Coding Solutions valued at $60.2 million based on the terms of the agreement with Carlyle.
See Note N for further discussion of the T-System Contribution.
We account for our investment in Coding Solutions under the equity method of accounting and the initial investment value of $60.2 million is included in Investments in unconsolidated affiliates on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2019.
QOMPLX
On July 23, 2019, Cannae Holdings, in partnership with Motive Partners, closed on an investment in preferred equity of QOMPLX, Inc. ("QOMPLX"), formerly Fractal Industries, Inc., an intelligent decision and analytics platform used by businesses for modeling and planning. We funded $15.0 million at close and funded an additional $15.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2019. $7.5 million of our investment made in the fourth quarter was for a note receivable convertible into preferred equity. Both the preferred equity and note receivable investments are included in Other long term investments and noncurrent assets on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet. Cannae's total preferred investment represents 18.8% of the outstanding voting equity of QOMPLX. Our Chairman William P. Foley II has joined QOMPLX’s Board of Directors.
See Note D for further discussion of our accounting for our investment in QOMPLX.
Externalization
On August 27, 2019, we announced the execution of definitive documents, which became effective on September 1, 2019, pursuant to which the Company transitioned to an externally managed structure (such externalization of certain management functions, the “Externalization”). In connection with the Externalization, the Company, Cannae Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a subsidiary of the Company (“Cannae LLC”), and Trasimene Capital Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Manager”), entered into a Management Services Agreement (the “Management Services Agreement”), which became effective September 1, 2019. The members of the Manager include certain directors and executive officers of the Company. Pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, certain services related to the management of the Company will be conducted by the Manager through the authority delegated to it in the Management Services Agreement and in accordance with the operational objectives and business plans approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. Subject at all times to the supervision and direction of the Board of Directors, the Manager will be responsible for, among other things, (a) managing the day-to-day business and operations of the Company and its subsidiaries, (b) evaluating the financial and operational performance of the Company's subsidiaries and other assets, (c) providing a management team to serve as some of the executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and (d) performing (or causing to be performed) any other services for and on behalf of the Company and its subsidiaries customarily performed by executive officers and employees of a public company.
Pursuant to the terms of the Management Services Agreement, Cannae LLC is obligated to pay the Manager a quarterly management fee equal to 0.375% (1.5% annualized) of the Company’s cost of invested capital (as defined in the Management Services Agreement) as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, payable in arrears in cash, as may be adjusted pursuant to the terms of the Management Services Agreement. Cannae LLC will be responsible for paying costs and expenses relating to the Company’s business and operations. Cannae LLC is required to reimburse the Manager for documented expenses of the Manager incurred on

52

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





the Company’s behalf, including any costs and expenses incurred in connection with the performance of the services under the Management Services Agreement.
The Company conducts its business through Cannae LLC. In connection with the consummation of the Externalization, an Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Cannae LLC (the “Operating Agreement”) was entered into on August 27, 2019, by and among Cannae LLC and the Company, the Manager and Cannae Holdco, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, which became effective on September 1, 2019.
For so long as the Management Services Agreement is in effect, the Company, as managing member of Cannae LLC, authorizes the Manager to (a) designate officers of Cannae LLC and (b) perform, or cause to be performed, the services as are set forth in the Management Services Agreement.
In connection with such services, so long as Cannae LLC’s profits with respect to a liquidity event (sale or other disposition) involving an investment (as defined in the Operating Agreement) exceed an annualized hurdle rate of 8%, Cannae LLC is obligated to pay carried interest with respect to such investment to the Manager. Generally, where such hurdle is satisfied, carried interest will be paid to the Manager in an amount equal to 15% of the profits on such investment (calculated as the proceeds of such investment less allocable management fees (as defined in the Operating Agreement) and the cost of such investment) for returns between 1.0x and 2.0x the cost of such investment (plus allocable management fees), and 20% of the profits on such investment for returns exceeding 2.0x the cost of such investment (plus allocable management fees). However, to the extent that, as of the liquidity event, the value of the portfolio of unrealized investments is less than the aggregate cost of such investments, then the Manager’s carried interest entitlement will be correspondingly reduced until such time as the investment portfolio has recovered in value.
The Management Services Agreement has an initial term of five years, expiring on September 1, 2024. Pursuant to its terms, the Management Services Agreement will be automatically renewed for one-year terms thereafter unless earlier terminated by either the Company or the Manager in accordance with the terms of the Management Services Agreement.
The Company and Manager began paying fees associated with the Externalization on November 1, 2019.
Equity Fund
On December 12, 2019, we entered into a limited partnership with an investment fund manager designed to opportunistically trade in marketable securities (the "Equity Fund"). We initially contributed $90.9 million of cash in exchange for limited partnership interests in the Equity Fund representing 49.0% of its outstanding equity and a deposit on hand with the Equity Fund. Cannae and the other limited partners of the Equity Fund intend to make pro-rata investments through April 2020. We are committed to invest a total of $245.0 million. Subsequent to December 31, 2019, we invested an additional $100.0 million in the Equity Fund. As of December 31, 2019, $45.3 million of our contribution to the Equity Fund is held on deposit with the Equity Fund until such time as the general partner utilizes the funds and other limited partners make matching pro-rata contributions. Our investment held on deposit is included in Prepaid expense and other current assets on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2019. We account for the $45.6 million of our investment which was contributed to the Equity Fund's capital under the equity method of accounting and such portion is included in Investments in unconsolidated affiliates on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2019.
Other Developments
On September 18, 2019, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a resolution increasing to nine the size our Board of Directors to nine, and elected Mark D. Linehan to serve on our Board of Directors. Mr. Linehan will serve in Class III of our Board of Directors, and his term will expire at the annual meeting of our shareholders to be held in 2020. Mr. Linehan has not been appointed to any committee of our Board.
On December 5, 2019, we completed a public offering of 7,475,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to a prospectus supplement, dated December 3, 2019, and the base prospectus, dated November 27, 2019, included in our registration statement on Form S-3 ASR (File No. 333-235303), which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 27, 2019. We received net proceeds from the Offering of approximately $236.0 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and capitalized offering expenses payable by the Company. We intend to use the net proceeds of the offering to fund future acquisitions and for working capital and general corporate purposes.
On December 24, 2019, we entered into an equity commitment letter with funds associated with Thomas H. Lee Partners L.P. ("THL") pursuant to which Cannae is committed to provide $125.0 million to a partnership (the “AmeriLife Joint Venture”) which will invest in the recapitalization of AmeriLife Group, LLC ("AmeriLife"). Cannae, THL and other investors will provide $617.0 million of aggregate equity financing to the AmeriLife Joint Venture to acquire AmeriLife. We have the option to syndicate a portion of our equity commitment prior to closing and expect to be a minority owner of the AmeriLife Joint Venture. The transaction

53

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





is expected to close in the first or second quarter of 2020. AmeriLife is a leader in marketing and distributing life, health, and retirement solutions.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Highly liquid instruments, including money market instruments, purchased as part of cash management with original maturities of three months or less, and certain amounts in transit from credit and debit card processors, are considered cash equivalents. The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets for these instruments approximate their fair value.
Restricted Cash
The Restaurant Group is required to hold cash collateralizing its outstanding letters of credit. Included in Cash and cash equivalents on our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2019 is $11.4 million of such restricted cash. There was no restricted cash as of December 31, 2018.
Investments
Fixed maturity securities are purchased based on factors including rate of return, maturity, credit risk, duration, and tax considerations. Fixed maturity securities, which may be sold prior to maturity, are carried at fair value and are classified as available for sale as of the balance sheet dates. Fair values for fixed maturity securities are principally a function of current market conditions and are valued based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are unobservable. See Note C. Discount or premium is recorded for the difference between the purchase price and the principal amount. The discount or premium is amortized or accrued using the interest method and is recorded as an adjustment to interest and investment income. The interest method results in the recognition of a constant rate of return on the investment equal to the prevailing rate at the time of purchase or at the time of subsequent adjustments of book value.
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are recorded using the equity method of accounting.
Realized gains and losses on the sale of investments are determined on the basis of the cost of the specific investments sold and are credited or charged to income on a trade date basis. Unrealized gains or losses on fixed maturity securities, which are classified as available for sale, net of applicable deferred income tax expenses (benefits), are excluded from earnings and credited or charged directly to a separate component of equity. If any unrealized losses on available for sale securities are determined to be other-than-temporary, such unrealized losses are recognized as realized losses. Unrealized losses are considered other-than-temporary if factors exist that cause us to believe that the value will not increase to a level sufficient to recover our cost basis. Some factors considered in evaluating whether or not a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary include (i) our need and intent to sell the investment prior to a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in value; (ii) the duration and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost; and (iii) the financial condition and prospects of the issuer. Such reviews are inherently uncertain and the value of the investment may not fully recover or may decline in future periods resulting in a realized loss.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair values of financial instruments presented in the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements are estimates of the fair values at a specific point in time using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and significant judgment in the interpretation of current market data. We do not necessarily intend to dispose of or liquidate such instruments prior to maturity. See Note C for further details.
Trade Receivables
Trade receivables on the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets for the Restaurant Group consists primarily of billings to third-party customers of Blue Ribbon's bakery business, business to business gift card sales, insurance-related reimbursement, rebates, tenant improvement allowances, and billings to franchisees for royalties, initial and renewal fees, equipment sales and rent. Trade receivables are recorded net of an allowance for doubtful accounts, which is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses related to existing receivables.
The carrying values reported in the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets for trade receivables approximate their fair value.
Inventory
Inventory primarily consists of raw materials, finished pies, food, beverages packaging and supplies in our Restaurant Group segment and is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first in, first out method for restaurant inventory and standard cost that approximates actual cost on a first in, first out basis for the bakery operations.


54

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of cash on deposit with the Equity Fund, prepaid operating expenses, the current portion of notes receivable and other miscellaneous current assets.
Other long term investments and non-current assets
Other long-term investments consist of land held for investment purposes and investments in equity securities without a readily determinable fair value. Land is carried at historical cost. See Note D for further discussion of our accounting for equity securities without a readily determinable fair value.
Other non-current assets include notes receivable from third-parties and other miscellaneous non-current assets.
Leases
Refer to Note B.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of identifiable net assets acquired and assumed in business combinations. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential impairment, through a comparison of fair value to the carrying amount. We have the option to first assess goodwill for impairment based on a review of qualitative factors to determine if events and circumstances exist that will lead to a determination that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, prior to performing a full fair-value assessment. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, the Company determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the quantitative impairment test is unnecessary. However, if the Company concludes otherwise, then it is required to perform the quantitative impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing the fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit. Goodwill impairment, if any, is measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value.
For the year ended December 31, 2019 we recorded $35.1 million of impairment to goodwill in our former T-System segment and $10.4 million of impairment to goodwill in our Restaurant Group segment. The impairment in our former T-System segment is primarily a result of a decline in earnings multiples from comparable public companies and lower forecasted cash flows for its reporting units. The impairment charge in our Restaurant Group is a result of deteriorating operating results and cash flow resulting from declining same store sales and increased costs, primarily in our Village Inn and Bakers Square branded stores. The impairments recorded were calculated as the deficit between the carrying value of the reporting units of each segment compared to the fair value of the reporting unit determined by performing a combination of discounted cash flow and market approaches.
Impairment to goodwill in our former T-System segment is included in Net loss from discontinued operations on the Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019. See Note N.
For the year ended December 31, 2018 we recorded $26.7 million of impairment to goodwill in our Restaurant Group segment. The impairment charge was a result of deteriorating operating results and cash flow resulting from declining same store sales and increased costs. The impairment recorded was calculated as the deficit between the carrying value of a reporting unit of the Restaurant Group segment compared to the fair value of the reporting unit determined by performing a combination of discounted cash flow and market approaches.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, we determined that there were no events or circumstances which indicated that the carrying value of goodwill exceeded the fair value and no impairment was recorded.
Other Intangible Assets
We have other intangible assets, not including goodwill, which consist primarily of customer relationships and contracts, trademarks and tradenames that are generally recorded in connection with acquisitions at their fair value, franchise rights, the fair value of purchased software and capitalized software development costs. Intangible assets with estimable lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. In general, customer relationships are amortized over their estimated useful lives using an accelerated method, which takes into consideration expected customer attrition rates. Contractual relationships are generally amortized over their respective contractual lives. Useful lives of computer software range from three to ten years. Trademarks and tradenames are generally considered intangible assets with indefinite lives and are reviewed for impairment at least annually. Capitalized software development costs and purchased software are recorded at cost and amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful life.

55

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





We recorded $17.1 million of impairment expense related to the Village Inn and Bakers Square tradenames within our Restaurant Group in the year ended December 31, 2019. We recorded $5.8 million of impairment expense related to a tradename and an abandoned software project in our Restaurant Group in the year ended December 31, 2018. We recorded $2.9 million of impairment expense related to a tradename in our Restaurant Group in the year ended December 31, 2017. The impairments are recorded within Other operating expenses on our Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations for the years then ended.
Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment, net are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed primarily using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets: thirty to forty years for buildings and three to twenty-five years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the term of the applicable lease or the estimated useful lives of such assets.
In our Restaurant Group, all direct external costs associated with obtaining the land, building and equipment for each new restaurant, as well as construction period interest, are capitalized. Direct external costs associated with obtaining the dining room and kitchen equipment, signage and other assets and equipment are also capitalized. In addition, for each new restaurant and re-branded restaurant, a portion of the internal direct costs of its real estate and construction department are also capitalized.
Property and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We recorded $6.6 million, $8.1 million, and $6.9 million of impairment expense related to Property and equipment in our Restaurant Group segment in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, which is recorded within Other operating expenses on our Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations for the years then ended.
Insurance Reserves
Our Restaurant Group companies are currently self-insured for a portion of its workers' compensation, general liability, and liquor liability losses (collectively, casualty losses) as well as certain other insurable risks. To mitigate the cost of the Restaurant Group's exposures for certain property and casualty losses, we make annual decisions to either retain the risks of loss up to a certain maximum per occurrence, aggregate loss limits negotiated with its insurance carriers, or fully insure those risks. Our Restaurant Group companies are also self-insured for healthcare claims for eligible participating employees subject to certain deductibles and limitations. We have accounted for such retained liabilities for casualty losses and healthcare claims, including reported and incurred but not reported claims, based on information provided by third-party actuaries. As of December 31, 2019, our Restaurant Group companies were committed under letters of credit totaling $16.3 million issued primarily in connection with casualty insurance programs.
Income Taxes
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities and expected benefits of utilizing net operating loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The impact of changes in tax rates and laws on deferred taxes, if any, is applied to the years during which temporary differences are expected to be settled and reflected in the financial statements in the period enacted.
We recognize the benefits of uncertain tax positions in the financial statements only after determining a more likely than not probability that the uncertain tax positions will withstand challenge, if any, from taxing authorities. When facts and circumstances change, we reassess these probabilities and record any changes in the financial statements as appropriate. Uncertain tax positions are accounted for by determining the minimum recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. This determination requires the use of judgment in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items. Tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold are recognized and measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits as components of income tax expense.
Parent Investment in FNFV
Parent investment in FNFV on the Consolidated and Combined Statement of Equity represents FNF's historical investment in the Company, the Company's accumulated net earnings after taxes prior to the Split-Off, and the net effect of transactions with and allocations from FNF prior to the Split-Off. In conjunction with the Split-Off, Parent investment in FNFV was reclassified to Additional paid-in capital.


56

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Revenue Recognition
Refer to Note U.
Advertising Costs
The Company expenses advertising and marketing costs as incurred, except for certain advertising production costs that are initially capitalized and subsequently expensed the first time the advertising takes place. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, the Company incurred $30.0 million, $34.7 million, and $35.5 million of advertising and marketing costs, respectively, related to advertising in our Restaurant Group and in our real estate operations. These costs are included in Other operating expenses on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations.
Comprehensive Earnings
We report comprehensive earnings in accordance with GAAP on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Earnings. Total comprehensive earnings are defined as all changes in shareholders' equity during a period, other than those resulting from investments by and distributions to shareholders. While total comprehensive earnings is the activity in a period and is largely driven by net earnings in that period, accumulated other comprehensive earnings or loss represents the cumulative balance of other comprehensive earnings, net of tax, as of the balance sheet date. Amounts reclassified to net earnings relate to realized losses and are included in Realized gains and losses, net on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. Our policy is to release income tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income at such time as the earnings or loss of the related activity are recognized in earnings (e.g., upon sale of an investment).
Changes in the balance of other comprehensive earnings by component are as follows:
 
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments and other financial instruments, net (excluding investments in unconsolidated affiliates)
 
Unrealized (loss) gain relating to investments in unconsolidated affiliates
 
Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Earnings
 
(In millions)
Balance December 31, 2017
$
(6.9
)
 
$
(64.1
)
 
$
(71.0
)
Other comprehensive earnings (loss)
0.9

 
(12.0
)
 
(11.1
)
Adjustment for adoption of ASU 2018-02
(1.6
)
 
(14.5
)
 
(16.1
)
      Reclassification adjustments
7.0

 
24.0

 
31.0

Balance December 31, 2018
(0.6
)
 
(66.6
)
 
(67.2
)
Other comprehensive earnings
0.1

 
7.1

 
7.2

Cumulative effect of adoption of accounting standards by unconsolidated affiliates

 
(5.0
)
 
(5.0
)
      Reclassification adjustments

 
19.1

 
19.1

Balance December 31, 2019
$
(0.5
)
 
$
(45.4
)
 
$
(45.9
)

Stock-Based Compensation Plans
Stock-based compensation expense includes restricted stock awards granted to certain members of management in Cannae common stock, as well as in historical FNFV Group tracking stock. We account for stock-based compensation plans using the fair value method. Under the fair value method of accounting, compensation cost is measured based on the fair value of the award at the grant date, using quoted market prices of the underlying stock, and recognized over the service period. See Note O.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share, as presented on the Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations, is computed by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
In periods when earnings are positive, diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the impact of assumed conversions of potentially dilutive securities. For periods when we recognize a net loss, diluted earnings per share is equal to basic earnings per share as the impact of assumed conversions of potentially dilutive securities is considered to be antidilutive. We have granted certain shares of restricted stock, which have been treated as common share equivalents for purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share for periods in which positive earnings have been reported.
Instruments that provide the ability to purchase shares of our common stock that are antidilutive are excluded from the

57

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





computation of diluted earnings per share. For the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, no antidilutive shares were outstanding. For the year ended December 31, 2017, 0.1 million shares of restricted stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as they were antidilutive.
Note B.         Leases
We adopted Topic 842 on January 1, 2019 using a modified retrospective approach. Prior years continue to be reported under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 840. See Note S for further discussion of the current period effects of adoption of Topic 842.
We are party to operating lease arrangements primarily for leased real estate for restaurants and office space. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities related to operating leases under ASC 842 are recorded at commencement when we are party to a contract that conveys the right for the Company to control an asset for a specified period of time. We are not a party to any material contracts considered finance leases. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities related to operating leases are recorded as Lease assets and Lease liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2019.
Our material operating leases range in term from one year to eighteen years. As of December 31, 2019, the weighted-average remaining lease term of our operating leases was approximately eight years. Leases with an initial term of twelve months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet and we recognize lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Our operating lease agreements do not contain any material buyout options, residual value guarantees or restrictive covenants.
Most of our leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term by varying amounts. The exercise of lease renewal options is at our sole discretion. We include options to renew, not to exceed a total lease term of twenty years, in our measurement of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities when they are considered reasonably certain of exercise. We consider a lease probable for renewal when the duration of the lease extensions are in the foreseeable future and related to assets for which continued use is reasonably assured.
Excluding certain immaterial classes of leases in our Restaurant Group, we do not separate lease components from non-lease components for any of our right of use assets.
Our operating lease liabilities are determined by discounting future lease payments using a discount rate which represents our best estimate of the incremental borrowing rate our subsidiaries would have to pay to borrow money to finance the asset over the underlying lease term and for an amount equal to the lease payments. Our discount rate is based on interest rates associated with comparable public company secured debt for companies similar to our operating subsidiaries and of similar duration to the underlying lease. As of December 31, 2019, the weighted-average discount rate used to determine our operating lease liabilities was 7.67%.
Our lease costs are directly attributable to restaurant operations, primarily for real estate and to a lesser extent certain restaurant equipment. $58.5 million of operating lease costs are included in Cost of restaurant revenue on the Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded impairment expense of $21.1 million related to lease assets in our Restaurant Group which is recorded within Other operating expenses on our Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations.
We do not have any material short term lease costs, variable lease costs, or sublease income.

58

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Future payments under operating lease arrangements accounted for under ASC Topic 842 as of December 31, 2019 are as follows (in millions):
2020
$
56.1

2021
51.3

2022
40.8

2023
34.0

2024
23.8

Thereafter
97.3

Total lease payments, undiscounted
$
303.3

Less: discount
62.1

Total operating lease liability as of December 31, 2019, at present value
$
241.2

Less: operating lease liability as of December 31, 2019, current
41.5

Operating lease liability as of December 31, 2019, long term
$
199.7


Future payments under operating lease arrangements accounted for under ASC Topic 840 as of December 31, 2018, excluding payments related to T-System which is now reflected in discontinued operations, are as follows (in millions):
2019
$
61.3

2020
57.0

2021
51.3

2022
40.7

2023
34.1

Thereafter
133.2

Total future minimum operating lease payments
$
377.6


Rent expense incurred under operating leases during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 recorded pursuant to ASC Topic 840 was $60.8 million and $61.7 million, respectively. No abandoned lease charges were recorded in the years ended December 31, 2018 or 2017.

Note C.
Fair Value Measurements
The fair value hierarchy established by the accounting standards on fair value measurements includes three levels, which are based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure the financial instruments fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument. Financial assets and liabilities that are recorded in the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets are categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:
Level 1.    Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that we have the ability to access.
Level 2.    Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3.    Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on model inputs that are unobservable.

59

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Recurring Fair Value Measurements
      The following table presents our fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively:
 
December 31, 2019
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
(In millions)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed-maturity securities available for sale:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Corporate debt securities
$

 
$

 
$
19.2

 
$
19.2

     Total assets
$

 
$

 
$
19.2

 
$
19.2


 
December 31, 2018
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
(In millions)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed-maturity securities available for sale:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Corporate debt securities
$

 
$

 
$
17.8

 
$
17.8

     Total assets
$

 
$

 
$
17.8

 
$
17.8


Our Level 3 fair value measurement for our fixed maturity securities available for sale are provided by a single third-party pricing service. Depending on security specific characteristics, either an income or a contingent claims approach was utilized in determining fair value of our Level 3 fixed-maturity securities available for sale. Discount rates are the primary unobservable inputs utilized for the securities valued using an income approach. The discount rates used are based on company-specific risk premiums, public company comparable securities, and leveraged loan indices. The discount rates used in our determination of the fair value of our Level 3 fixed-maturity securities available for sale varies by security type and ranged from 14.8% to 16.0% and had a weighted average of 16.0% as of December 31, 2019. Based on the total fair value of our Level 3 fixed-maturity securities available for sale as of December 31, 2019, changes in the discount rate utilized will not result in a fair value significantly different than the amount recorded.
The following table presents a summary of the changes in the fair values of Level 3 assets, measured on a recurring basis.
 
Corporate debt
 
securities
Fair value, December 31, 2017
$

Transfers from Level 2
21.4

Paid-in-kind dividends (1)
0.3

Accretion of original purchase discount (1)
0.7

Impairment (2)
(12.5
)
Reclassification of impairment previously included in other comprehensive earnings to net earnings
7.9

Fair value, December 31, 2018
$
17.8

Paid-in-kind dividends (1)
0.2

Impairment (2)
(0.4
)
Net valuation gain included in other comprehensive earnings (3)
1.6

Fair value, December 31, 2019
$
19.2

(1) Included in Interest and investment income on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations
(2) Included in Realized gains, net on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations
(3) Included in Unrealized gain (loss) on investments and other financial instruments, net (excluding investments in unconsolidated affiliates) on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Earnings


60

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Transfers into or out of the Level 3 fair value category occur when unobservable inputs become more or less significant to the fair value measurement or upon a change in valuation technique. For the year ended December 31, 2018, transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 were based on changes in significance of unobservable inputs used associated with a change in the service provider and in the valuation technique used to value our corporate debt securities. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers between levels in the fair value hierarchy at the end of the reporting period in which they occur.
All of the unrealized gain (loss) on investments and other financial instruments, net (excluding investments in unconsolidated affiliates) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 relate to fixed maturity securities considered Level 3 fair value measures.
Additional information regarding the fair value of our investment portfolio is included in Note D.
The carrying amounts of trade receivables and notes receivable approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. The fair value of our notes payable is included in Note K.
Note D.        Investments
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates recorded using the equity method of accounting as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following (in millions):
 
Ownership at December 31, 2019
 
2019
 
2018
Dun & Bradstreet
24.3
%
 
$
385.9

 
$

Ceridian
16.4
%
 
309.5

 
359.7

Other
various

 
141.1

 
37.5

Total
 

 
$
836.5

 
$
397.2


Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates for the periods indicated consisted of the following (in millions):
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
Ceridian
$
16.4

 
$
(20.5
)
 
$
1.9

Dun & Bradstreet
(132.8
)
 

 

Other
1.3

 
4.4

 
1.5

Total
$
(115.1
)
 
$
(16.1
)
 
$
3.4



Dun & Bradstreet
Of our previously disclosed $900.0 million commitment to purchase common equity of the ultimate parent of D&B, we retained and funded a $505.6 million investment (the "D&B Investment"), representing 24.5% of the outstanding common equity of Dun & Bradstreet's ultimate parent, and syndicated the remainder to other investors. We funded the D&B Investment through a combination of cash on hand and borrowings on the Margin Loan and FNF Revolver (each, as defined below in Note F). On the closing date, we recorded income of $9.1 million for syndication fees from D&B which is recorded in Other income in our Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019. We also recorded a reduction in our investment of $2.9 million for our ratable portion of the syndication fees capitalized as equity issuance costs by Dun & Bradstreet.
In April and August 2019, we syndicated an additional $2.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of our D&B Investment to other investors. The syndications resulted in a reduction in the Company's ownership to 24.3% of the outstanding common equity of Dun & Bradstreet's ultimate parent.
On June 27, 2019, we made an additional pro-rata investment of $23.5 million in D&B's ultimate parent. Dun & Bradstreet used the proceeds to partially fund its acquisition of Lattice (see Note A).

61

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Summarized financial information for the ultimate parent of Dun & Bradstreet, Star Parent, L.P, for the relevant dates and time periods included in Investments in unconsolidated affiliates and Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates in our Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets and Statements of Operations, respectively, is presented below. Our net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2019 include the Company’s equity in Dun & Bradstreet’s losses for the period from February 8, 2019, the date of the D&B Investment, through December 31, 2019.
 
December 31,
2019
 
(In millions)
Total current assets
$
418.6

Goodwill and other intangible assets, net
8,091.9

Other assets
602.1

Total assets
$
9,112.6

 
 
Current liabilities
$
1,090.4

Long-term debt
3,818.9

Other non-current liabilities
1,595.9

Total liabilities
6,505.2

Preferred equity
1,030.6

Total capital
1,576.8

Total liabilities and equity
$
9,112.6

 
Year ended December 31, 2019
 
(In millions)
Total revenues
$
1,413.9

Loss before income taxes
(540.0
)
Net loss
(425.8
)
Dividends attributable to preferred equity and noncontrolling interest expense
(120.5
)
Net loss attributable to Dun & Bradstreet
(546.3
)


Ceridian
Based on quoted market prices, the aggregate value of our ownership of Ceridian common stock was $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2019.
As of December 31, 2019, we hold less than 20% of the outstanding common equity of Ceridian but continue to account for our investment under the equity method because we continue to exert significant influence through our 16.4% ownership, representation on its board of directors and, in combination with other of its equity sponsors, control of the size of its board of directors.
Available for Sale Securities
The carrying amounts and fair values of our available for sale securities at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
 
December 31, 2019
 
Carrying
Value
 
Cost Basis
 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities available for sale:
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

Corporate debt securities
$
19.2

 
$
19.6

 
$
0.7

 
$
(1.1
)
 
$
19.2

  Total
$
19.2

 
$
19.6

 
$
0.7

 
$
(1.1
)
 
$
19.2


62

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





 
December 31, 2018
 
Carrying
Value
 
Cost Basis
 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities available for sale:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Corporate debt securities
$
17.8

 
$
18.8

 
$
0.9

 
$
(1.9
)
 
$
17.8

  Total
$
17.8

 
$
18.8

 
$
0.9

 
$
(1.9
)
 
$
17.8


The cost basis of fixed maturity securities available for sale includes an adjustment for amortized premium or discount since the date of purchase.
As of December 31, 2019$16.9 million of our fixed maturity securities are corporate debt securities with a maturity of greater than one year, but less than five years, and $2.3 million are corporate debt securities with a maturity of less than 1 year. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Net unrealized losses on investment securities and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2019 were as follows (in millions):
 
Less than 12 Months
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
 
Value
 
Losses
Corporate debt securities
$
10.8

 
$
(1.1
)
Total temporarily impaired securities
$
10.8

 
$
(1.1
)

During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we incurred $0.4 million and $12.5 million, respectively, of other-than-temporary impairment charges relating to corporate debt securities, which is included in Realized gains (losses), net on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. The impairments recorded relate to a corporate debt holding that has experienced a prolonged period of declining earnings and which we are uncertain of our ability to recover our initial investment. The entire loss represents credit loss recognized in earnings and no portion of the loss was included in other comprehensive earnings.
During the year ended December 31, 2017 we incurred no other-than-temporary impairment charges relating to available for sale investments.
As of December 31, 2019, we held $2.2 million of corporate debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment had been previously recognized. It is possible that future events may lead us to recognize potential future impairment losses related to our investment portfolio and that unanticipated future events may lead us to dispose of certain investment holdings and recognize the effects of any market movements in our results of operations.
Short-term Investments
Short-term investments consist primarily of commercial paper and short-duration U.S. agency securities, which have an original maturity of greater than three months but less than one year. Short-term investments are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Investments Without Readily Determinable Fair Values
We account for our investment in QOMPLX's preferred equity as an investment in equity securities at cost less impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly market transactions. As of December 31, 2019, we have $22.5 million recorded for our investment in the preferred equity of QOMPLX. We have not recorded any upward or downward adjustments to our investment in QOMPLX's preferred equity.


63

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Note E. 
Property and Equipment
      Property and equipment consists of the following:
 
 
 
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
(In millions)
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
$
166.0

 
$
190.0

Leasehold improvements
158.9

 
137.8

Land
40.6

 
34.4

Buildings
28.9

 
27.2

Other
6.1

 
2.4

 
400.5

 
391.8

Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(237.9
)
 
(216.3
)
 
$
162.6

 
$
175.5


Depreciation expense on property and equipment was $35.8 million, $38.0 million, and $41.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Note F. 
Goodwill
Goodwill consists of the following:
 
 
Restaurant Group
 
Corporate
and Other
 
Total
 
(in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2017
 
$
103.2

 
$

 
$
103.2

Impairment
 
(26.7
)
 

 
(26.7
)
Balance, December 31, 2018
 
$
76.5

 
$

 
$
76.5

Impairment
 
(10.4
)
 

 
(10.4
)
Balance, December 31, 2019
 
$
66.1

 
$

 
$
66.1


Note G. 
Variable Interest Entities
The Company, in the normal course of business, engages in certain activities that involve variable interest entities ("VIEs"), which are legal entities in which the equity investors as a group lack any of the characteristics of a controlling interest. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is generally the enterprise that has both the power to direct the activities most significant to the economic performance of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company evaluates its interest in certain entities to determine if these entities meet the definition of a VIE and whether the Company is the primary beneficiary and should consolidate the entity based on the variable interests it held both at inception and when there is a change in circumstances that requires a reconsideration. If the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE, it must account for the VIE as a consolidated subsidiary. If the Company is determined not to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE but holds a variable interest in the entity, such variable interests are accounted for under accounting standards as deemed appropriate. As of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we are not the primary beneficiary of any VIEs.
Unconsolidated VIEs
The table below summarizes select information related to variable interests held by the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, of which we are not the primary beneficiary:

64

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





 
 
2019
 
2018
 
 
Total Assets
 
Maximum Exposure
 
Total Assets
 
Maximum Exposure
 
(in millions)
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
 
440.2

 
440.2

 
9.2

 
9.2


Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
The Company holds variable interests in certain unconsolidated affiliates, outlined in the table above, which are primarily comprised of Dun & Bradstreet (see Note D), the Equity Fund and, to a lesser extent, funds that hold minority ownership interests primarily in healthcare-related entities. The principal risk to which these investments and funds are exposed is the credit risk of the underlying investees. We do not provide any implicit or explicit liquidity guarantees or principal value guarantees to these VIEs. The assets are included in investments in unconsolidated affiliates on the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets and accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
Note H.  
Other Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets consist of the following:
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
(In millions)
Trademarks and tradenames
$
53.9

 
$
71.0

Software
17.1

 
17.0

Franchise rights
7.2

 
7.2

Customer relationships and contracts
5.2

 
5.2

Other

 
44.2

 
83.4

 
144.6

Accumulated amortization
(20.3
)
 
(52.2
)
 
$
63.1

 
$
92.4


Amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets, which consist primarily of software, franchise rights, and customer relationships and contracts, was $4.9 million, $8.3 million, and $4.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for the next five years for assets owned at December 31, 2019, is $3.7 million in 2020, $2.7 million in 2021, $0.9 million in 2022, $0.7 million in 2023 and $0.7 million in 2024. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, we had $52.1 million and $69.2 million, respectively of indefinite-lived tradenames.
Note I. 
Inventory
Inventory consists of the following:
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
(In millions)
Bakery inventory:
 
 
 
Raw materials
$
2.8

 
$
6.8

Semi-finished and finished goods
3.6

 
5.6

Packaging
1.2

 
2.4

Obsolescence reserve
(0.9
)
 
(3.0
)
Total bakery inventory
6.7

 
11.8

Restaurant and other inventory
9.4

 
10.3

Other, non-restaurant inventory
0.2

 
0.2

Total inventory
$
16.3

 
$
22.3



65

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Note J.  
Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, current consist of the following:
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
(In millions)
Accrued payroll and employee benefits
$
25.3

 
$
22.8

Trade accounts payable
19.6

 
23.0

Accrued casualty insurance expenses
13.3

 
16.7

Tax liabilities, excluding income taxes payable
11.9

 
13.4

Other accrued liabilities
16.3


19.7

 
$
86.4

 
$
95.6

Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, long term consist of the following:
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
(In millions)
Restaurant Group Financing Obligations
$
27.5

 
$

Unfavorable lease liability and rent payable

 
34.9

Other accrued liabilities
16.4

 
22.2

 
$
43.9

 
$
57.1


Note K. 
Notes Payable
Notes payable consists of the following:
 
 
December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
 
(In millions)
99 Term Loan
 
30.9

 
36.1

99 Revolver
 
3.0

 

DLOC Loan
 

 

Margin Facility
 
75.0

 

FNF Revolver
 

 

Brasada Interstate Loans
 
13.4

 
11.7

Other
 
4.8

 
0.3

Notes payable, total
 
$
127.1

 
$
48.1

Less: Notes payable, current
 
7.0

 
5.9

Notes payable, long term
 
$
120.1

 
$
42.2


At December 31, 2019, the carrying value of our outstanding notes payable approximated fair value. The respective carrying values of the loans under the 99 Restaurants Credit Facility and the B Note, Development Loan and Line of Credit Loan pursuant to the Interstate Credit Agreement, each as defined below, approximate fair value as they are variable rate instruments with monthly reset periods which reflect current market rates. The revolving credit facilities are considered Level 2 financial liabilities. The fixed-rate A Note, as defined below, pursuant to the Interstate Credit Agreement approximates fair value as of December 31, 2019.
Notes Payable
On December 21, 2018, 99 Restaurants LLC, a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of 99 Restaurants entered into the 99 Restaurants Credit Facility with Fifth Third Bank and other lenders thereto. The 99 Restaurants Credit Facility provides for (i) a maximum revolving loan of $15.0 million (the “99 Revolver”) with a maturity date of December 21, 2023; (ii) a maximum term loan of $37.0 million (the "99 Term Loan") with monthly installment repayments through November 30, 2023 and a maturity date of December 21, 2023 for the outstanding unpaid principal balance; and (iii) a maximum Development Line of Credit loan (the

66

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





“DLOC Loan”) of up to $10.0 million to be advanced from time to time through December 21, 2020, with quarterly installment payments through (a) September 30, 2024 with respect to DLOC Loans borrowed prior to December 21, 2019, and (b) September 30, 2025 with respect to DLOC Loans borrowed on or after December 21, 2019. Interest on the 99 Credit Facility is based on, at our option, an applicable margin of (x) two and one half percent (2.50%) per annum with respect to Base Rate Loans, as provided therein, and (y) three and one half percent (3.50%) per annum with respect to LIBOR Loans, as provided therein. The 99 Restaurants Credit Facility also allows for 99 Restaurants LLC to request up to $5.0 million of letters of credit commitments and $2.5 million in swingline debt from Fifth Third Bank as the administrative agent. The obligations of the 99 Restaurants LLC under the 99 Restaurants Credit Facility are guaranteed by 99 Restaurants. The 99 Restaurants Credit Facility is subject to affirmative, negative and financial covenants customary for financings of this type, including, among other things, limits on the Borrower’s creation of liens, sales of assets, incurrence of indebtedness, restricted payments and transactions with affiliates. The 99 Restaurants Credit Facility includes customary events of default for facilities of this type (with customary grace periods, as applicable). The 99 Restaurants Credit Facility provides that, upon the occurrence of an event of default, Fifth Third Bank, as administrative agent, may (i) declare the principal of, and any and all accrued and unpaid interest and all other amounts owed in respect of, the loans immediately due and payable, (ii) terminate loan commitments and (iii) exercise all other rights and remedies available to Fifth Third Bank or the lenders under the loan documents. Proceeds of $36.2 million for the 99 Term Loan were received at closing and primarily used to repay the remaining balance outstanding under an intercompany credit facility. As of December 31, 2019, interest on the 99 Term Loan and 99 Revolver is payable monthly at a rate of 5.25% and 5.38%, respectively, and there is $22.0 million available to borrow under the 99 Revolver and DLOC Loan. On February 26, 2020, 99 Restaurants repaid $10.0 million of the outstanding balance under the 99 Term Loan.
On November 7, 2018, Cannae Funding, LLC (the "Borrower"), a wholly-owned special purpose subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Margin Loan Agreement (the "Original Loan Agreement"), and certain other related agreements, with Credit Suisse AG (in such capacity, "Administrative Agent") and other lenders thereto. On December 18, 2019, the Borrower entered into an Amended and Restated Margin Loan Agreement (the “Amended Loan Agreement”) with the lenders thereto, the Administrative Agent, and others which amended the Original Loan Agreement. Pursuant to the Amended Loan Agreement, the Borrower may borrow up to $300.0 million (the "Margin Facility") in term loans at an interest rate of the three-month LIBOR plus an applicable margin. Interest on term loans under the Margin Facility is payable in-kind or cash at the Borrower's election. The Original Loan Agreement was secured by a first priority lien on 25.0 million shares of Ceridian held by the Company which was contributed to the Borrower prior to any draws under the Margin Facility. On November 13, 2019 and December 18, 2019, 5,000,000 and 200,000 shares, respectively, of Ceridian were released from such lien. Accordingly, the Amended Loan Agreement is secured by a first priority lien on 19,800,000 shares of Ceridian. The Margin Facility is subject to maintenance and margin LTV ratios pursuant to which the Borrower will be required to maintain a certain loan to value ratio (based on the value of Ceridian common stock held by Borrower). In the event that this ratio is not maintained, the Borrower must post additional cash collateral under the Loan Agreement and/or elect to repay a portion of the term loans thereunder. The Amended Loan Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, covenants, event-of-default, and margin maintenance provisions for financings of this nature which, subject to certain terms and conditions, can result in the acceleration of the principal amount of, and accrued interest on, all outstanding term loans under the Margin Facility upon occurrence. On December 18, 2019, the Borrower repaid $75.0 million of the outstanding balance under the Margin Facility. As of December 31, 2019, $75.0 million was outstanding under the Margin Facility which accrues interest at a rate of 4.7% and there was $225 million available to borrow under the Margin Facility.
On February 18, 2020, we repaid the remaining $75.0 million outstanding under the Margin Facility and terminated the Amended Loan Agreement. Accordingly, we have no borrowing capacity and all of the Company's holdings of Ceridian common stock have been released from the first priority lien under the Margin Facility.
On January 29, 2016, FNF NV Brasada, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company and majority-owned subsidiary of Cannae ("NV Brasada"), entered into a credit agreement with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $17.0 million (the "Interstate Credit Agreement") originally with Bank of the Cascades, as lender. The Interstate Credit Agreement provides for (i) a $12.5 million acquisition loan (the "Acquisition Loan"), (ii) a $3.0 million development loan (the "Development Loan"), and (iii) a $1.5 million line of credit loan (the "Line of Credit Loan", and collectively with the Acquisition Loan and the Development Loan, the "Interstate Loans"). On June 13, 2018, the Interstate Credit Agreement was modified to add an additional line of credit of $3.6 million the ("C Note") and to assign the loan from the Bank of the Cascades to First Interstate Bank. Pursuant to the Acquisition Loan, NV Brasada executed a $6.25 million "A Note", which accrues interest at a rate of 4.51% per annum and matures on the tenth anniversary of the issuance thereof, and a $6.25 million "B Note", which accrues interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 225 basis points, adjusted monthly, and matures on the tenth anniversary of the issuance thereof. NV Brasada makes equal monthly payments of principal and interest under the Acquisition Loan. Each of the Development Loan and the Line of Credit Loan accrue interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 225 basis points, adjusted monthly, and mature on the second anniversary of the respective issuances thereof. NV Brasada makes equal monthly payments of interest under the Development Loan and the Line of Credit Loan. The Interstate Loans are secured by certain single-family residential lots that can be sold for construction, owned by NV Brasada, and certain other

67

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





operating assets owned by NV Brasada. The Company does not provide any guaranty or stock pledge under the Interstate Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2019, there was $13.4 million, net of debt issuance costs, outstanding under the Interstate Credit Agreement; the B Note and Line of Credit Loan incurred interest at 3.97%; the C Note had $2.1 million outstanding and incurred interest at 3.94%; and there was $3.8 million of aggregate borrowing capacity under the Development Loan and Line of Credit Loan.
On August 19, 2014, Blue Ribbon entered into a credit agreement (the “Blue Ribbon Credit Facility”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as administrative agent, Swingline Lender and Issuing Lender, Bank of America, N.A. as syndication agent and the other financial institutions party thereto. In March 2018, the borrowings outstanding under the Blue Ribbon Credit Facility was assigned to Cannae and subsequently paid off in its entirety.
FNF Revolver
On November 17, 2017, FNF issued to Cannae a revolver note in aggregate principal amount of up to $100.0 million (the "FNF Revolver"). Pursuant to the FNF Revolver, FNF may make one or more loans to us in increments of $1.0 million, with up to $100.0 million outstanding at any time. The FNF Revolver accrues interest at LIBOR plus 450 basis points and matures on the five-year anniversary of the date of the FNF Revolver. The maturity date is automatically extended for additional five-year terms unless notice of non-renewal is otherwise provided by either FNF or Cannae, in their sole discretion. On February 7, 2019, we drew the $100.0 million available and used the proceeds to fund, in part, the Dun & Bradstreet Investment. On June 12, 2019 we repaid to FNF the $100.0 million outstanding under the FNF Revolver. On July 5, 2019, we again drew the $100.0 million available and used the proceeds for general corporate purposes. On September 11, 2019, we again repaid to FNF the $100.0 million outstanding amount under the FNF Revolver. As of December 31, 2019, there was no outstanding balance and $100.0 million of available borrowing capacity under the FNF Revolver.
      Gross principal maturities of notes payable at December 31, 2019 are as follows (in millions):
 
2020
$
9.0

2021
7.1

2022
82.1

2023
19.8

2024
0.7

Thereafter
9.4

 
$
128.1


Note L.  
Income Taxes
 Income tax expense (benefit) on continuing operations consists of the following:
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
(In millions)
Current
$
64.7

 
$
27.3

 
$
(28.4
)
Deferred
(40.5
)
 
(12.3
)
 
14.2

 
$
24.2

 
$
15.0

 
$
(14.2
)


68

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





 A reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to our effective tax rate is as follows:
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
Federal statutory rate
21.0
 %
 
21.0
 %
 
35.0
 %
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
(0.2
)
 
3.6

 
3.1

Tax credits
(2.6
)
 
(22.7
)
 
8.7

Valuation allowance
0.5

 

 
6.0

Non-deductible expenses and other, net
0.1

 
0.2

 
(4.4
)
Non-deductible executive compensation
1.8

 
67.5

 

Dividends received deduction

 
(34.0
)
 

Noncontrolling interests
2.6

 
35.5

 
(7.7
)
Basis difference in investments
(2.8
)
 

 

Tax Reform

 
0.4

 
(13.4
)
Other
(1.0
)
 
3.8

 
(3.8
)
   Effective tax rate excluding equity investments
19.4
 %
 
75.3
 %
 
23.5
 %
Equity investments
(9.2
)
 
(8.9
)
 
(4.4
)
   Effective tax rate
10.2
 %
 
66.4
 %
 
19.1
 %

The Company’s effective tax rate at December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 is 10.2%, 66.4% and 19.1%, respectively. The decrease from 2019 to 2018 primarily relates to the decreased impact of non-deductible executive compensation on pretax income. The increase in 2018 from 2017 primarily relates to increased non-deductible executive compensation expense which was partially offset by a dividends received deduction. Additionally, the impact of the non-controlling interests, permanent items, and tax credits on pretax income was greater in 2018 than the impact of those same items on pretax earnings and losses in 2019 and 2017, respectively.
The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2019 and 2018 consist of the following:
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
(In millions)
Deferred tax assets:
 

 
 

Employee benefit accruals
$

 
$
0.2

Net operating loss carryforwards
1.1

 
0.3

Equity investments

 
8.9

Investment securities

 
2.8

Partnerships
54.1

 
11.1

Accrued liabilities

 
0.1

Other
0.4

 
0.6

Total gross deferred tax asset
55.6

 
24.0

Less: valuation allowance
(1.1
)
 

Total deferred tax asset
$
54.5

 
$
24.0

Deferred tax liabilities:
 

 
 

Depreciation
$

 
$
(0.2
)
Total deferred tax liability
$

 
$
(0.2
)
Net deferred tax asset
$
54.5

 
$
23.8


The Company's net deferred tax asset was $54.5 million and $23.8 million at December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively. In conjunction with an internal reorganization of the Company whereby Cannae LLC, formerly a disregarded entity under Cannae Holdings, Inc., became a partnership and now holds all of the Company’s investments, our deferred tax assets are now reflected

69

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





primarily as the book to tax difference in the Company's investment in Cannae LLC. The Company, through its direct and indirect interests, holds a 100% ownership percentage of Cannae LLC.
The increase in our net deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2019 from 2018 is primarily related to book losses from the Company’s investments in Blue Ribbon and D&B, as well as the difference between the book and tax basis for the Company's initial investment in Coding Solutions.
The Company’s gross federal and state NOL carryforwards were $19.7 million and $6.3 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The NOLs expire in various tax years through 2040.
ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance should be established against their deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all of the available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets may not be realized. Management evaluated the Company’s deferred tax assets for recoverability using a consistent approach which considers the relative impact of negative and positive evidence, in particular, the Company’s historical profitability and any projections of future taxable income or potential future tax planning strategies. The Company recorded a valuation allowance of $1.1 million related to state NOLs, as it is more likely than not that the tax benefit of the state NOLs will not be realized before the NOLs expire.
Unrecognized tax benefits are recorded for differences between tax positions the Company takes, or expects to take, on its income tax return compared to the benefit recognized for financial statement purposes. The Company does not have any unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2019, 2018 or 2017.
The Company's federal and state income tax returns for the tax years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 remain subject to examination.
Note M.  
Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various pending and threatened litigation and regulatory matters related to our operations, some of which include claims for punitive or exemplary damages. Our ordinary course litigation includes purported class action lawsuits, which make allegations related to various aspects of our business. From time to time, we also receive requests for information from various state and federal regulatory authorities, some of which take the form of civil investigative demands or subpoenas. Some of these regulatory inquiries may result in the assessment of fines for violations of regulations or settlements with such authorities requiring a variety of remedies. We believe that no actions, other than those discussed below, if any, depart from customary litigation or regulatory inquiries incidental to our business.
Our Restaurant Group companies are a defendant from time to time in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including claims relating to injury or wrongful death under “dram shop” laws that allow a person to sue us based on any injury caused by an intoxicated person who was wrongfully served alcoholic beverages at one of the restaurants; individual and purported class or collective action claims alleging violation of federal and state employment, franchise and other laws; and claims from guests or employees alleging illness, injury or other food quality, health or operational concerns. Our Restaurant Group companies are also subject to compliance with extensive government laws and regulations related to employment practices and policies and the manufacture, preparation, and sale of food and alcohol. We may also become subject to lawsuits and other proceedings, as well as card network fines and penalties, arising out of the actual or alleged theft of our customers' credit or debit card information.
We review lawsuits and other legal and regulatory matters (collectively “legal proceedings”) on an ongoing basis when making accrual and disclosure decisions. When assessing reasonably possible and probable outcomes, management bases its decision on its assessment of the ultimate outcome assuming all appeals have been exhausted. For legal proceedings in which it has been determined that a loss is both probable and reasonably estimable, a liability based on known facts and which represents our best estimate is recorded. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, we had $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, accrued for legal proceedings. Actual losses may materially differ from the amounts recorded and the ultimate outcome of our pending legal proceedings is generally not yet determinable. While some of these matters could be material to our operating results or cash flows for any particular period in the event of an unfavorable outcome, at present, we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of currently pending legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.



70

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Blue Ribbon Reorganization
In conjunction with the Blue Ribbon Reorganization, we have agreed to provide debtor-in-possession financing (the "DIP Loan") of up to $20.0 million to Blue Ribbon and its subsidiaries. Subsequent to December 31, 2019, we have provided $7.5 million of financing to Blue Ribbon and its subsidiaries under the DIP Loan. As part of the Blue Ribbon Reorganization, Blue Ribbon also expects landlords to assert claims relating to the breakage of leases associated with its unprofitable stores which closed prior to the Blue Ribbon Reorganization. As of the date of this Annual Report, we estimate the potential claims from landlords of the stores closed prior to the Blue Ribbon Reorganization to be a maximum of approximately $7.0 million and the liability for professional fees associated with the Blue Ribbon Reorganization to be approximately $5.0 million to $7.0 million. These amounts may change or be compromised as the Blue Ribbon Reorganization progresses.
Unconditional Purchase Obligations
We have certain unconditional purchase obligations, primarily in our Restaurant Group segment. These purchase obligations are with various vendors and primarily related to food and beverage obligations with fixed commitments in regards to the time period of the contract and the quantities purchased with annual price adjustments that can fluctuate. We used both historical and projected volume and pricing as of December 31, 2019 to determine the amount of the obligations. Purchase obligations as of December 31, 2019 are as follows (in millions):
2020
$
181.9

2021
74.2

2022
15.1

2023
10.3

2024
9.3

Thereafter
10.6

Total purchase commitments
$
301.4


Note N.      Discontinued Operations
T-System
On December 31, 2019, we completed the T-System Contribution. As a result of the T-System Contribution, the results of operations of T-System have been reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods presented in our Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. We retained a 22.7% equity interest in Coding Solutions, the company to which we contributed our equity in T-System. We recognized a pre-tax loss of $6.4 million on the sale and $1.4 million in income tax benefit which are included in Net loss from discontinued operations on the Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.

71

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





A summary of the operations of T-System included in the Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations is shown below:
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
(in millions)
Revenues:
 
 
 
Other operating revenue
$
50.4

 
$
57.9

 
$
12.9

Total operating revenues
50.4

 
57.9

 
12.9

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Personnel costs
33.1

 
33.1

 
7.6

Depreciation and amortization
13.7

 
15.0

 
3.1

Other operating expenses
19.1

 
13.8

 
3.1

Goodwill impairment
35.1

 

 

Total operating expenses
101.0

 
61.9

 
13.8

Operating loss
(50.6
)
 
(4.0
)
 
(0.9
)
Other expense:
 
 
 
 
 
Realized loss
(6.9
)
 

 

Total other expense
(6.9
)
 

 

Loss before income taxes
(57.5
)
 
(4.0
)
 
(0.9
)
Income tax benefit
(5.7
)
 
(1.9
)
 
(2.4
)
Net (loss) earnings from discontinued operations
$
(51.8
)
 
$
(2.1
)
 
$
1.5

 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash flow from discontinued operations data:
 
 
 
 
 
Net cash provided by operations
$
2.7

 
$
5.2

 
(a)
Net cash used in investing activities
$
(0.5
)
 
$
(0.1
)
 
(a)
(a) Cash flow information for the period from October 16, 2017, the date on which we initially acquired T-System, through December 31, 2017 is not material for disclosure.
A reconciliation of the financial position of T-System to the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet is shown below:
 
December 31,
 
2018
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
7.4

Trade receivables
19.4

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
3.0

Total current assets of discontinued operations
29.8

Property and equipment, net
0.9

Other intangible assets, net
83.3

Goodwill
88.3

Other long term investments and noncurrent assets
10.7

Deferred tax asset
(6.8
)
Total noncurrent assets of discontinued operations
176.4

Total assets of discontinued operations
$
206.2

 
 
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, current
$
2.7

Deferred revenue
5.7

Total current liabilities of discontinued operations
8.4

Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, long term
0.5

Total noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations
0.5

Total liabilities of discontinued operations
$
8.9



72

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





OneDigital
On June 6, 2017, we closed on the sale of Digital Insurance, Inc. ("OneDigital") for $560.0 million in an all-cash transaction. After repayment of debt, payout to option holders and a minority equity investor and other transaction-related payments, the Company received $331.4 million from the sale, which includes $326.0 million in cash and $5.4 million in purchase price holdback receivable. As a result of the sale, the results of operations of OneDigital have been reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods presented in our Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $276.0 million on the sale and $126.3 million in income tax expense, which are included in Net earnings from discontinued operations on the Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2017. We received $4.5 million of the purchase price holdback and wrote-off the remainder in the year ended December 31, 2018. We retained no ownership in OneDigital and have no continuing involvement with OneDigital as of the date of the sale.
A summary of the operations of OneDigital included in the Consolidated and Combined Statement of Operations is shown below:
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2017
 
(in millions)
Revenues:
 
Other operating revenue
$
80.9

Total operating revenues
80.9

Operating expenses:
 
Personnel costs
56.9

Depreciation and amortization
8.8

Other operating expenses
11.3

Total operating expenses
77.0

Operating income
3.9

Other income (expense):
 
Interest expense
(2.9
)
Realized gain
276.0

Total other income
273.1

Earnings before income taxes
277.0

Income tax expense
129.3

Net earnings from discontinued operations
$
147.7

 
 
Cash flow from discontinued operations data:
 
Net cash provided by operations
$
17.3

Net cash used in investing activities
(27.3
)

Other acquisitions/disposals of businesses, net of cash acquired, on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes $25.9 million related to acquisitions made by OneDigital. Borrowings on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes $23.0 million related to borrowings made by OneDigital. Debt service payments on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes $3.0 million related to debt principal payments made by OneDigital.
Reconciliation to Consolidated Financial Statements
A reconciliation of the net earnings of T-System and OneDigital to the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations is shown below:
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
(in millions)
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations attributable to T-System
$
(51.8
)
 
$
(2.1
)
 
$
1.5

Earnings from discontinued operations attributable to One Digital

 

 
147.7

Total (loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax
$
(51.8
)
 
$
(2.1
)
 
$
149.2



73

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Note O.  
Employee Benefit Plans 
Omnibus Plan
       In 2017, we established the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”) authorizing the issuance of up to 3.9 million shares of common stock, subject to the terms of the Omnibus Plan. The 2017 Omnibus Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares, performance units, other cash and stock-based awards and dividend equivalents. As of December 31, 2019, there were 370,520 shares of Cannae restricted stock outstanding (the "CNNE Awards") under the Omnibus Plan. Awards granted are approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.
Restricted stock transactions under the Omnibus Plan in 2019, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Balance, December 31, 2016

 
$

Granted
287,059

 
18.45

Balance, December 31, 2017
287,059

 
$
18.45

     Granted
384,281

 
17.98

     Vested
(95,685
)
 
18.45

Balance, December 31, 2018
575,655

 
$
18.13

     Granted
18,642

 
34.45

     Vested
(223,777
)
 
18.18

Balance, December 31, 2019
370,520

 
$
18.93


Compensation cost relating to share-based payments is recognized in the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations based on the grant-date fair value of each award. Using the fair value method of accounting, compensation cost is measured based on the fair value of the award at the grant date and recognized over the service period of 3 years. Fair value of restricted stock awards and units is based on the grant date value of the underlying stock derived from quoted market prices. Net earnings attributable to Cannae reflects stock-based compensation expense for the CNNE Awards of $4.1 million, $2.0 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, which are included in personnel costs on the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. The total fair value of restricted stock awards granted in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $0.6 million, $6.9 million and $5.3 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2019, the unrecognized compensation cost related to the CNNE Awards is $6.5 million and is expected to be recognized over a period of 1.39 years.
On May 16, 2018, we issued 991,906 shares of our common stock (unrestricted) under the Omnibus Plan for the stock portion of bonuses paid in conjunction with Ceridian's initial public offering.
Note P.  
Concentration of Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables.
We place cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and, by policy, limit the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up our customer base, thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk. We control credit risk through monitoring procedures.
Our Restaurant Group companies obtain a majority of their restaurant food products and supplies from five distributors. Although we believe alternative vendors could be found in a timely manner, any disruption of these services could potentially have an adverse impact on operating results.

74

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Note Q.      Segment Information
Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments is shown in the following tables. There are several intercompany corporate related arrangements between our various businesses. The effects of these arrangements including intercompany notes and related interest and any other non-operational intercompany revenues and expenses have been eliminated in the segment presentations below.
On December 31, 2019, we completed the T-System Contribution. As a result, T-System is no longer a reportable segment of the Company and its results of operations have been reclassified as discontinued operations. See Note N.
On February 8, 2019, we completed the D&B Investment. Our chief operating decision maker reviews the full financial results of Dun & Bradstreet for purposes of assessing performance and allocating resources. Accordingly, we consider Dun & Bradstreet a reportable segment and have included the full results of Dun & Bradstreet subsequent to the D&B Investment in the tables below. See below for further discussion of Dun & Bradstreet and our accounting for our related investment.
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2019:
 
Restaurant Group
 
Ceridian
 
Dun & Bradstreet
 
 Corporate
and Other
 
Ceridian and Dun & Bradstreet Elimination
 
Total
 
(in millions)
Restaurant revenues
$
1,043.3

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,043.3

Other revenues

 
824.1

 
1,413.9

 
26.7

 
(2,238.0
)
 
26.7

Revenues from external customers
1,043.3

 
824.1

 
1,413.9

 
26.7

 
(2,238.0
)
 
1,070.0

Interest and investment income, including realized gains and losses
3.9

 

 
2.4

 
369.4

 
(2.4
)
 
373.3

Total revenues and other income
1,047.2

 
824.1

 
1,416.3

 
396.1

 
(2,240.4
)
 
1,443.3

Depreciation and amortization
38.5

 
57.1

 
482.4

 
2.2

 
(539.5
)
 
40.7

Interest expense
(5.4
)
 
(32.4
)
 
(303.5
)
 
(12.4
)
 
335.9

 
(17.8
)
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations, before income taxes and equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates
(80.9
)
 
34.3

 
(540.0
)
 
318.8

 
505.7

 
237.9

Income tax expense (benefit)
0.3

 
(44.4
)
 
(110.0
)
 
23.9

 
154.4

 
24.2

(Loss) earnings from continuing operations, before equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates
(81.2
)
 
78.7

 
(430.0
)
 
294.9

 
351.3

 
213.7

Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 
4.2

 
1.3

 
(120.6
)
 
(115.1
)
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations
$
(81.2
)
 
$
78.7

 
$
(425.8
)
 
$
296.2

 
$
230.7

 
$
98.6

Assets
$
572.8

 
$
6,085.7

 
$
9,112.6

 
$
1,519.4

 
$
(15,198.3
)
 
$
2,092.2

Goodwill
66.1

 
1,973.5

 
2,840.5

 

 
(4,814.0
)
 
66.1


75

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





As of and for the year ended December 31, 2018:
 
Restaurant Group
 
Ceridian
 
 Corporate
and Other
 
Ceridian Elimination
 
Total
 
(in millions)
Restaurant revenues
$
1,117.8

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,117.8

Other revenues

 
740.7

 
29.7

 
(740.7
)
 
29.7

Revenues from external customers
1,117.8

 
740.7

 
29.7

 
(740.7
)
 
1,147.5

Interest and investment income, including realized gains and losses
(2.1
)
 

 
175.2

 

 
173.1

Total revenues and other income
1,115.7

 
740.7

 
204.9

 
(740.7
)
 
1,320.6

Depreciation and amortization
44.9

 
56.6

 
1.4

 
(56.6
)
 
46.3

Interest expense
(16.0
)
 
(83.2
)
 
11.3

 
83.2

 
(4.7
)
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations, before income taxes and equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates
(96.8
)
 
(26.9
)
 
119.4

 
26.9

 
22.6

Income tax expense (benefit)
0.6

 
8.4

 
14.4

 
(8.4
)
 
15.0

(Loss) earnings from continuing operations, before equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates
(97.4
)
 
(35.3
)
 
105.0

 
35.3

 
7.6

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
0.1

 

 
4.3

 
(20.5
)
 
(16.1
)
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations
$
(97.3
)
 
$
(35.3
)
 
$
109.3

 
$
14.8

 
$
(8.5
)
Assets
$
432.3

 
$
5,247.8

 
$
1,027.2

 
$
(5,247.8
)
 
$
1,459.5

Goodwill
76.5

 
1,927.4

 

 
(1,927.4
)
 
76.5

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2017:
 
Restaurant Group
 
Ceridian
 
Corporate
and Other
 
Ceridian Elimination
 
Total
 
(in millions)
Restaurant revenues
$
1,129.0

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,129.0

Other revenues

 
670.8

 
27.6

 
(670.8
)
 
27.6

Revenues from external customers
1,129.0

 
670.8

 
27.6

 
(670.8
)
 
1,156.6

Interest and investment (loss) income, including realized gains and losses

 

 
10.2

 

 
10.2

Total revenues and other income
1,129.0

 
670.8

 
37.8

 
(670.8
)
 
1,166.8

Depreciation and amortization
43.6

 
53.8

 
2.6

 
(53.8
)
 
46.2

Interest expense
(6.6
)
 
(87.1
)
 
(0.4
)
 
87.1

 
(7.0
)
Loss from continuing operations, before income taxes and equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates
(36.1
)
 
(54.1
)
 
(38.2
)
 
54.1

 
(74.3
)
Income tax expense (benefit)
0.7

 
(49.6
)
 
(14.9
)
 
49.6

 
(14.2
)
Loss from continuing operations, before equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates
(36.8
)
 
(4.5
)
 
(23.3
)
 
4.5

 
(60.1
)
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates
0.1

 

 
1.4

 
1.9

 
3.4

Loss from continuing operations
$
(36.7
)
 
$
(4.5
)
 
$
(21.9
)
 
$
6.4

 
$
(56.7
)
Assets
$
501.0

 
$
6,729.9

 
$
986.2

 
$
(6,729.9
)
 
$
1,487.2

Goodwill
103.2

 
1,961.0

 

 
(1,961.0
)
 
103.2


The activities in our segments include the following:
Restaurant Group.  This segment consists of the operations of Blue Ribbon, O'Charley's and 99 Restaurants, in which we have 65.4%, 65.4% and 88.5% ownership interests, respectively. Blue Ribbon and its affiliates are the owners and operators of the Village Inn and Bakers Square food service and restaurant concepts, as well as the Legendary Baking bakery operation. O'Charley's and its affiliates are the owners and operators of the O'Charley's restaurant concept. 99 Restaurants and its affiliates are the owners and operators of Ninety Nine Restaurants restaurant concept.
Dun & Bradstreet. This segment consists of our 24.3% ownership interest in Dun & Bradstreet. Dun & Bradstreet is a leading global provider of business decisioning data and analytics. Its mission is to deliver a global network of trust, enabling clients to transform uncertainty into confidence, risk into opportunity and potential into prosperity. Clients embed D&B's trusted, end-to-end solutions into their daily workflows to enhance salesforce productivity, gain visibility into key markets, inform commercial credit decisions and confirm that suppliers are financially viable and compliant with laws and regulations. Dun & Bradstreet's solutions support its clients’ mission critical business operations by

76

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





providing proprietary and curated data and analytics to help drive informed decisions and improved outcomes. Dun & Bradstreet's global commercial database as of December 31, 2019 contained more than 355 million business records. Our chief operating decision maker reviews the full financial results of Dun & Bradstreet for purposes of assessing performance and allocating resources. Thus, we consider Dun & Bradstreet a reportable segment and have included the full results of Dun & Bradstreet subsequent to the D&B Acquisition in the tables above. We account for Dun & Bradstreet using the equity method of accounting, and therefore its results do not consolidate into ours. Accordingly, we have presented the elimination of Dun & Bradstreet's results in the Ceridian and Dun & Bradstreet Elimination section of the segment presentation above. Our net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2019, includes our equity in Dun & Bradstreet’s losses for the period from February 8, 2019, the date of the D&B Investment, to December 31, 2019. See Note D for further discussion of our investment in Dun & Bradstreet and related accounting.
Ceridian.  This segment consists of our 16.4% ownership interest in Ceridian. Ceridian is a global human capital management (“HCM”) software company. Dayforce, Ceridian's flagship cloud HCM platform, provides human resources (“HR”), payroll, benefits, workforce management, and talent management functionality. Dayforce is a single application that provides continuous real-time calculations across all modules to enable, for example, payroll administrators access to data through the entire pay period, and managers access to real-time data to optimize work schedules. Dayforce offers a comprehensive range of functionality, including global HR, payroll, benefits, workforce management, and talent management on web and native iOS and Android platforms. Ceridian's Dayforce mobile app enables employees not only to request and to trade schedules, but also to see the real-time impact of schedule changes on their pay. Our chief operating decision maker reviews the full financial results of Ceridian for purposes of assessing performance and allocating resources. Thus, we consider Ceridian a reportable segment and have included the full financial results of Ceridian in the table above. We account for our investment in Ceridian under the equity method of accounting and therefore its results of operations do not consolidate into ours. Accordingly, we have presented the elimination of Ceridian's results in the Ceridian and Dun & Bradstreet Elimination section of the segment presentation above.
Corporate and Other.  This aggregation of nonreportable segments consists of our share in the operations of certain controlled portfolio companies and other equity investments, activity of the corporate holding company and certain intercompany eliminations and taxes. Total assets for this segment as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 also include the assets of T-System. See Note N Discontinued Operations for further details.
Note R.      Related Party Transactions
FNF
As a former wholly-owned subsidiary of FNF, we have incurred payables related to historical intercompany transactions, taxes and cost allocations between us and FNF. FNF forgave these historical intercompany receivables due from us which amounted to $4.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2017.
The Company is allocated certain corporate overhead and management services expenses from FNF based on the terms of the CSA and our proportionate share of the expense determined on actual usage and our best estimate of management's allocation of time. Total operating expenses allocated from FNF to us was $1.3 million, $1.3 million and $9.5 million in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
On January 17, 2020, we completed the purchase of our corporate office headquarters in Las Vegas, Nevada from an affiliate of FNF for $9.3 million.
On November 16, 2017, certain subsidiaries of FNF contributed an aggregate of $100.0 million to us (the "FNF Investment") in exchange for 5,706,134 shares of our common stock.
On November 17, 2017, FNF issued to the Company the $100.0 million FNF Revolver. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there was no outstanding balance and $100.0 million of borrowing capacity under the FNF Revolver. Refer to Note K for further discussion.
Trasimene
Our Manager is considered a related party. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we incurred $2.1 million of management fees payable to our Manager for the period from November 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019.
Note S.  
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842). The amendments in this ASU introduce broad changes to the accounting and reporting for leases by lessees. The main provisions of the new standard include: clarifications to the definitions of a lease, components of leases, and criteria for determining lease classification; requiring

77

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





virtually all leased assets, including operating leases and related liabilities, to be reflected on the lessee's balance sheet; and expanding and adding to the required disclosures for lessees. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11 Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements which allows entities the option to adopt this standard by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening equity, if necessary, and only include required disclosures for prior periods.
We adopted Topic 842 on January 1, 2019 using a modified retrospective approach prescribed by ASU 2018-11 and recorded an operating lease right-of-use asset (Lease assets) of $246.0 million and an operating lease liability for future discounted lease payment obligations (Lease liabilities) of $279.4 million at the date of adoption. The other material impacts of the adoption of Topic 842 also resulted in a decrease of $9.1 million and $42.3 million to our Other intangible assets, net and Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, respectively. We elected to apply the following package of practical expedients on a consistent basis permitting entities not to reassess: (i) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain a lease; (ii) lease classification for any expired or existing leases and (iii) whether initial direct costs for any expired or existing leases qualify for capitalization under the amended guidance.
See Note B for further discussion of our leasing arrangements and related accounting.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendments in this ASU introduce broad changes to accounting for credit impairment of financial instruments. The primary updates include the introduction of a new current expected credit loss ("CECL") model that is based on expected rather than incurred losses and amendments to the accounting for impairment of debt securities available for sale. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The standard will primarily impact our accounting for the allowance for bad debt on certain of our subsidiaries' trade receivables and credit losses for our notes receivable and fixed maturity securities. We do not expect the changes to result in a material impact to our recorded balances for these assets. We will not early adopt the standard.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12 Income Taxes - Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (Topic 740), which simplifies various aspects of the income tax accounting guidance and will be applied using different approaches depending on what the specific amendment relates to and, for public entities, are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. We are still evaluating the impact of this guidance and have not yet concluded on its anticipated impact on our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements and related disclosures upon adoption.


78

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Note T.  
Supplementary Cash Flow Information
The following supplemental cash flow information is provided with respect to interest and tax payments, as well as certain non-cash investing and financing activities.
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
(In millions)
Cash paid during the year:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Interest
 
$
15.6

 
$
3.3

 
$
8.7

Income taxes
 
48.6

 
0.2

 
117.7

Operating leases
 
62.6

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-cash investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisition of Ceridian HCM common shares through non-cash private placement investment - see Note A
 
$

 
$
(33.4
)
 

Non-cash distribution of LifeWorks from Ceridian - see Note A
 

 
32.5

 

Investment in Coding Solutions received as partial consideration for the T-System Contribution
 
60.2

 

 

Non-cash financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities and noncontrolling interests assumed in connection with acquisitions (1):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair value of net assets acquired
 
$

 
$

 
$
252.5

Less: Total cash purchase price
 

 

 
222.7

Liabilities and noncontrolling interests assumed
 
$

 
$

 
$
29.8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt extinguished through the sale of OneDigital
 
$

 
$

 
$
151.1

Financing obligations assumed by O'Charley's in exchange for property
 
14.6

 

 

Property obtained by O'Charley's in exchange for stores
 
10.5

 

 

_____________________________________
(1) Business combinations in the year ended December 31, 2017 related to acquisitions made by our former subsidiary, One Digital. See Note N.
Note U — Revenue Recognition
On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASC Topic 606 by applying the modified retrospective method. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC Topic 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for the prior period. The adoption of ASC Topic 606 did not have a significant impact on the timing or amount of recognition of revenue for our primary sources of revenue. Differences between our historical revenue recognition and revenue which would have been recorded had we retrospectively restated prior periods to conform with ASC Topic 606 are not considered material. We recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to opening equity as of January 1, 2018 of $1.9 million as a result of adoption of ASC Topic 606.

79

CANNAE HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (continued)





Disaggregation of Revenue
Our revenue consists of the following:
 
 
 
 
Year ended December 31,
 
 
 
 
2019
 
2018
Revenue Stream
 
Segment
 
Total Revenue
Restaurant revenue:
 
 
 
(in millions)
Restaurant sales
 
Restaurant Group
 
$
958.4

 
$
1,023.0

Bakery sales
 
Restaurant Group
 
78.9

 
88.8

Franchise and other
 
Restaurant Group
 
6.0

 
6.0

Total restaurant revenue
 
 
 
1,043.3

 
1,117.8

Other operating revenue:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate and resort
 
Corporate and other
 
25.9

 
23.2

Other
 
Corporate and other
 
0.8

 
6.5

Total other operating revenue
 
 
 
26.7

 
29.7

Total operating revenue
 
 
 
1,070.0

 
1,147.5


Restaurant revenue consists of restaurant sales, bakery operations, and, to a lesser extent, franchise revenue and other revenue. Restaurant sales include food and beverage sales and gift card breakage, are net of applicable state and local sales taxes and discounts, and are recognized at a point in time as services are performed and goods are provided.
Revenue from bakery operations is recognized at a point in time in the period during which the products are shipped and control transfers to the customer.
Franchise revenue and other revenue consist of development fees and royalties on sales by franchised units. Initial franchise fees are recognized as income upon commencement of the franchise operation and completion of all material services and conditions by the Company. Royalties are calculated as a percentage of the franchisee sales and recognized in the period in which the sales are generated. Revenue resulting from the sale of gift cards is recognized in the period in which the gift card is redeemed and is recorded as deferred revenue until recognized.
Other operating revenue consists of income generated by our resort operations which includes sales of real estate, lodging rentals, food and beverage sales, and other income from various resort services offered. Revenue is recognized upon closing of the sale of real estate or once goods and services have been provided and billed to the customer.
Contract Balances
The following table provides information about receivables and deferred revenue:
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
(In millions)
Trade receivables, net
$
16.0

 
$
30.4

Deferred revenue (contract liabilities)
26.4

 
25.8


Deferred revenue is recorded primarily for restaurant gift card sales. The unrecognized portion of such revenue is recorded as Deferred revenue in the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets. Revenue of $20.4 million was recognized in the year ended December 31, 2019 and was included in Deferred revenue at the beginning of the period.
There was no impairment related to contract balances.

80


Item 9. 
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. 
Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the year covered by this Annual Report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is: (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and (b) accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth under the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our evaluation under this framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included herein.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the year ended December 31, 2019, management executed its remediation plan including (i) utilizing external resources to assist with the redesign, refinement and implementation of the processes and controls over the accounting for Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASC Topic 606") at T-System, (ii) improving the monitoring activities around the application of ASC Topic 606 at T-System including more detailed reviews of underlying data and calculations, (iii) enhancing the information shared and communication between the Company and T-System management, and (iv) testing the operating effectiveness of the controls impacted by our remediation efforts. Management believes that as a result of the measures described above, the previously disclosed material weaknesses that existed as of December 31, 2018, have been fully remediated and no longer exist as of December 31, 2019.
As described in Note A to our Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements included in this Annual Report, we completed the T-System Contribution on December 31, 2019 and as a result it was deconsolidated and is no longer included in our internal control over financial reporting.
Other than the actions taken above in response to the material weaknesses previously identified, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.
Other Information
None.

81


PART III
Items 10-14.
 Within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year, we intend to file with the SEC the matters required by these items.

82


PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) (1) Financial Statements.  The following is a list of the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements of Cannae Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries included in Item 8 of Part II:
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements or notes thereto.

83


(a) (2) The following exhibits are incorporated by reference or are set forth on pages to this Form 10-K:
Exhibit
Number
Description
 
 
2.1
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15



84


Exhibit
Number
Description
 
 
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19

21.1
23.1
23.2
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
99.1
101.INS
Inline XBRL Instance Document (2)
101.SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.PRE
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.LAB
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File formatted Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.
(1) A management or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K 
(2) The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document.

Item 16.
Form 10-K Summary
None.


85


SIGNATURES  
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
Cannae Holdings, Inc.
 
 
By: 
/s/  Richard N. Massey
 
 
 
Richard N. Massey
 
 
 
Chief Executive Officer and Director
 
 
 
 
Date: February 28, 2020

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
 
 
 
 
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
 
 
 
 
/s/  Richard N. Massey
 
Chief Executive Officer and Director
 
February 28, 2020
Richard N. Massey
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/  Richard L. Cox
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
February 28, 2020
Richard L. Cox
 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/  William P. Foley, II
 
Director
 
February 28, 2020
William P. Foley, II
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/  Hugh R. Harris
 
Director
 
February 28, 2020
Hugh R. Harris
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ C. Malcolm Holland
 
Director
 
February 28, 2020
C. Malcolm Holland
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Mark D. Linehan
 
Director
 
February 28, 2020
Mark D. Linehan
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Frank R. Martire
 
Director
 
February 28, 2020
Frank R. Martire
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Erika Meinhardt
 
Director
 
February 28, 2020
Erika Meinhardt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ James B. Stallings, Jr.
 
Director
 
February 28, 2020
James B. Stallings, Jr.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Frank P. Willey
 
Director
 
February 28, 2020
Frank P. Willey
 
 
 
 


86