CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP INC - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2008
OR
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission
File Number: 0-13358
CAPITAL
CITY BANK GROUP, INC.
|
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
Florida
|
59-2273542
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
217
North Monroe Street, Tallahassee, Florida
|
32301
|
|
(Address
of principal executive office)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(850)
402-7000
|
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer”, “accelerated
filer", and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
(Do
not check if smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
At July
31, 2008, 17,123,475 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock, $.01 par value,
were outstanding.
CAPITAL
CITY BANK GROUP, INC.
QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART
I – Financial Information
|
Page
|
||
Item
1.
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
||
4
|
|||
5
|
|||
6
|
|||
7
|
|||
8
|
|||
Item
2.
|
17
|
||
Item
3.
|
34
|
||
Item
4.
|
34
|
||
PART
II – Other Information
|
|||
Item
1.
|
34
|
||
Item
1A.
|
34
|
||
Item
2.
|
35
|
||
Item
3.
|
35
|
||
Item
4.
|
35
|
||
Item
5.
|
36
|
||
Item
6.
|
36
|
||
37
|
INTRODUCTORY
NOTE
Caution
Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. These forward-looking statements include, among others,
statements about our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, estimates
and intentions that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and are
subject to change based on various factors, many of which are beyond our
control. The words "may," "could," "should," "would," "believe,"
"anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "target," "goal," and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements.
All
forward-looking statements, by their nature, are subject to risks and
uncertainties. Our actual future results may differ materially from
those set forth in our forward-looking statements.
Our
ability to achieve our financial objectives could be adversely affected by the
factors discussed in detail in Part I, Item 2., “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Part II, Item 1A.
“Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the following sections of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “2007
Form 10-K”): (a) “Introductory Note” in Part I, Item 1. “Business” (b) “Risk
Factors” in Part I, Item 1A., as updated in our subsequent quarterly reports
filed on Form 10-Q, and (c) “Introduction” in “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in Part II, Item 7.
as well as:
§
|
the
frequency and magnitude of foreclosure of our
loans;
|
§
|
the
adequacy of collateral underlying collateralized loans and our ability to
resell the collateral if we foreclose on the
loans;
|
§
|
the
effects of our lack of a diversified loan portfolio, including the risks
of geographic and industry
concentrations;
|
§
|
the
accuracy of our financial statement estimates and assumptions, including
the estimate for our loan loss
provision;
|
§
|
the
extent to which our nonperforming loans increase or decrease as a
percentage of our total loan
portfolio;
|
§
|
our
ability to integrate the business and operations of companies and banks
that we have acquired, and those we may acquire in the
future;
|
§
|
our
need and our ability to incur additional debt or equity
financing;
|
§
|
the
strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the
local economies in which we conduct
operations;
|
§
|
the
effects of harsh weather conditions, including
hurricanes;
|
§
|
inflation,
interest rate, market and monetary
fluctuations;
|
§
|
effect
of changes in the stock market and other capital
markets;
|
§
|
legislative
or regulatory changes;
|
§
|
our
ability to comply with the extensive laws and regulations to which we are
subject;
|
§
|
the
willingness of clients to accept third-party products and services rather
than our products and services and vice
versa;
|
§
|
changes
in the securities and real estate
markets;
|
§
|
increased
competition and its effect on
pricing;
|
§
|
technological
changes;
|
§
|
changes
in monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S.
Government;
|
§
|
the
effects of security breaches and computer viruses that may affect our
computer systems;
|
§
|
changes
in consumer spending and saving
habits;
|
§
|
growth
and profitability of our noninterest
income;
|
§
|
changes
in accounting principles, policies, practices or
guidelines;
|
§
|
the
limited trading activity of our common
stock;
|
§
|
the
concentration of ownership of our common
stock;
|
§
|
anti-takeover
provisions under federal and state law as well as our Articles of
Incorporation and our Bylaws;
|
§
|
other
risks described from time to time in our filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and
|
§
|
our
ability to manage the risks involved in the
foregoing.
|
However,
other factors besides those referenced also could adversely affect our results,
and you should not consider any such list of factors to be a complete set of all
potential risks or uncertainties. Any forward-looking statements made
by us or on our behalf speak only as of the date they are made. We do
not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, except as required by
applicable law.
PART
I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1. CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
CAPITAL
CITY BANK GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AS
OF JUNE 30, 2008 AND DECEMBER 31, 2007
(Dollars
In Thousands, Except Share Data)
|
June
30, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and Due From Banks
|
$
|
108,672
|
$
|
93,437
|
||||
Funds
Sold and Interest Bearing Deposits
|
192,786
|
166,260
|
||||||
Total
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
301,458
|
259,697
|
||||||
Investment
Securities, Available-for-Sale
|
185,971
|
190,719
|
||||||
Loans,
Net of Unearned Interest
|
1,916,815
|
1,915,850
|
||||||
Allowance
for Loan Losses
|
(22,518
|
)
|
(18,066
|
)
|
||||
Loans,
Net
|
1,894,297
|
1,897,784
|
||||||
Premises
and Equipment, Net
|
102,559
|
98,612
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
84,811
|
84,811
|
||||||
Other
Intangible Assets
|
10,840
|
13,757
|
||||||
Other
Assets
|
69,479
|
70,947
|
||||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
2,649,415
|
$
|
2,616,327
|
||||
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Deposits:
|
||||||||
Noninterest
Bearing Deposits
|
$
|
416,992
|
$
|
432,659
|
||||
Interest
Bearing Deposits
|
1,745,934
|
1,709,685
|
||||||
Total
Deposits
|
2,162,926
|
2,142,344
|
||||||
Short-Term
Borrowings
|
51,783
|
53,131
|
||||||
Subordinated
Notes Payable
|
62,887
|
62,887
|
||||||
Other
Long-Term Borrowings
|
36,857
|
26,731
|
||||||
Other
Liabilities
|
38,382
|
38,559
|
||||||
Total
Liabilities
|
2,352,835
|
2,323,652
|
||||||
SHAREOWNERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Preferred
Stock, $.01 par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized;
no
shares outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Common
Stock, $.01 par value, 90,000,000 shares authorized; 17,111,439 and
17,182,553 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively
|
171
|
172
|
||||||
Additional
Paid-In Capital
|
36,382
|
38,243
|
||||||
Retained
Earnings
|
266,171
|
260,325
|
||||||
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax
|
(6,144
|
)
|
(6,065
|
)
|
||||
Total
Shareowners' Equity
|
296,580
|
292,675
|
||||||
Total
Liabilities and Shareowners' Equity
|
$
|
2,649,415
|
$
|
2,616,327
|
The
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of
these statements.
CAPITAL
CITY BANK GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
INTEREST
INCOME
|
|||||||||||||||||
Interest
and Fees on Loans
|
$
|
33,422
|
$
|
39,092
|
$
|
68,677
|
$
|
78,145
|
|||||||||
Investment
Securities:
|
|||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury
|
182
|
142
|
349
|
283
|
|||||||||||||
U.S.
Govt. Agencies
|
665
|
916
|
1,426
|
1,856
|
|||||||||||||
States
and Political Subdivisions
|
781
|
708
|
1,567
|
1,384
|
|||||||||||||
Other
Securities
|
182
|
177
|
361
|
360
|
|||||||||||||
Funds
Sold
|
1,028
|
689
|
2,603
|
1,210
|
|||||||||||||
Total
Interest Income
|
36,260
|
41,724
|
74,983
|
83,238
|
|||||||||||||
INTEREST
EXPENSE
|
|||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
7,162
|
11,098
|
17,643
|
22,098
|
|||||||||||||
Short-Term
Borrowings
|
296
|
737
|
817
|
1,498
|
|||||||||||||
Subordinated
Notes Payable
|
931
|
932
|
1,862
|
1,858
|
|||||||||||||
Other
Long-Term Borrowings
|
396
|
496
|
727
|
998
|
|||||||||||||
Total
Interest Expense
|
8,785
|
13,263
|
21,049
|
26,452
|
|||||||||||||
NET
INTEREST INCOME
|
27,475
|
28,461
|
53,934
|
56,786
|
|||||||||||||
Provision
for Loan Losses
|
5,432
|
1,675
|
9,574
|
2,912
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Interest Income After Provision For Loan Losses
|
22,043
|
26,786
|
44,360
|
53,874
|
|||||||||||||
NONINTEREST
INCOME
|
|||||||||||||||||
Service
Charges on Deposit Accounts
|
7,060
|
6,442
|
13,825
|
12,487
|
|||||||||||||
Data
Processing
|
812
|
790
|
1,625
|
1,505
|
|||||||||||||
Asset
Management Fees
|
1,125
|
1,175
|
2,275
|
2,400
|
|||||||||||||
Securities
Transactions
|
30
|
0
|
95
|
7
|
|||||||||||||
Mortgage
Banking Revenues
|
506
|
850
|
1,000
|
1,529
|
|||||||||||||
Bank
Card Fees
|
3,908
|
3,504
|
7,869
|
6,991
|
|||||||||||||
Other
|
2,277
|
2,323
|
6,828
|
4,127
|
|||||||||||||
Total
Noninterest Income
|
15,718
|
15,084
|
33,517
|
29,046
|
|||||||||||||
NONINTEREST
EXPENSE
|
|||||||||||||||||
Salaries
and Associate Benefits
|
15,318
|
14,992
|
30,922
|
30,711
|
|||||||||||||
Occupancy,
Net
|
2,491
|
2,324
|
4,853
|
4,560
|
|||||||||||||
Furniture
and Equipment
|
2,583
|
2,494
|
5,165
|
4,843
|
|||||||||||||
Intangible
Amortization
|
1,459
|
1,458
|
2,917
|
2,917
|
|||||||||||||
Other
|
8,905
|
8,629
|
16,697
|
17,428
|
|||||||||||||
Total
Noninterest Expense
|
30,756
|
29,897
|
60,554
|
60,459
|
|||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
7,005
|
11,973
|
17,323
|
22,461
|
|||||||||||||
Income
Taxes
|
2,195
|
4,082
|
5,233
|
7,613
|
|||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$
|
4,810
|
$
|
7,891
|
$
|
12,090
|
$
|
14,848
|
|||||||||
Basic
Net Income Per Share
|
$
|
.28
|
$
|
.43
|
$
|
.70
|
$
|
.81
|
|||||||||
Diluted
Net Income Per Share
|
$
|
.28
|
$
|
.43
|
$
|
.70
|
$
|
.81
|
|||||||||
Average
Basic Shares Outstanding
|
17,146,395
|
18,089,022
|
17,158,312
|
18,247,991
|
|||||||||||||
Average
Diluted Shares Outstanding
|
17,146,837
|
18,089,223
|
17,159,052
|
18,248,245
|
The
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of
these statements.
CAPITAL
CITY BANK GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREOWNERS'
EQUITY
(Dollars
In Thousands, Except Share Data)
|
Shares
Outstanding
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Taxes
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
17,182,553
|
$
|
172
|
$
|
38,243
|
$
|
260,325
|
$
|
(6,065
|
)
|
$
|
292,675
|
|||||||
Cumulative
Effect of Adoption of EITF 06-4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(30
|
)
|
-
|
(30
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
12,090
|
-
|
12,090
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Change in Unrealized Gain On
Available-for-Sale
Securities (net of tax)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(79
|
)
|
(79
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Total
Comprehensive Income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
12,011
|
|||||||||||||
Cash
Dividends ($.3700 per share)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(6,214)
|
-
|
(6,214
|
)
|
||||||||||||
Stock
Performance Plan Compensation
|
-
|
-
|
17
|
-
|
-
|
17
|
|||||||||||||
Issuance
of Common Stock
|
18,927
|
-
|
535
|
-
|
-
|
535
|
|||||||||||||
Repurchase
of Common Stock
|
(90,041
|
)
|
(1)
|
(2,413
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(2,414
|
)
|
||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2008
|
17,111,439
|
$
|
171
|
$
|
36,382
|
$
|
266,171
|
$
|
(6,144
|
)
|
$
|
296,580
|
The
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of
these statements.
CAPITAL
CITY BANK GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
12,090
|
$
|
14,848
|
||||
Adjustments
to Reconcile Net Income to
Cash
Provided by Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
Provision
for Loan Losses
|
9,574
|
2,912
|
||||||
Depreciation
|
3,447
|
3,087
|
||||||
Net
Securities Amortization
|
337
|
170
|
||||||
Amortization
of Intangible Assets
|
2,917
|
2,917
|
||||||
Gain
on Securities Transactions
|
(95
|
)
|
(7
|
)
|
||||
Origination
of Loans Held-for-Sale
|
(32,269
|
)
|
(94,830
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
From Sales of Loans Held-for-Sale
|
35,931
|
93,254
|
||||||
Net
Gain From Sales of Loans Held-for-Sale
|
(1,000
|
)
|
(1,529
|
)
|
||||
Non-Cash
Compensation
|
17
|
63
|
||||||
Deferred
Income Taxes
|
(730
|
)
|
76
|
|||||
Net
Decrease (Increase) in Other Assets
|
7,922
|
(3,508
|
)
|
|||||
Net
(Decrease) Increase in Other Liabilities
|
(1,387
|
)
|
11,271
|
|||||
Net
Cash Provided By Operating Activities
|
36,754
|
28,724
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Securities
Available-for-Sale:
|
||||||||
Purchases
|
(49,001
|
)
|
(27,582
|
)
|
||||
Sales
|
3,508
|
-
|
||||||
Payments,
Maturities, and Calls
|
49,846
|
29,186
|
||||||
Net
(Increase) Decrease in Loans
|
(13,216
|
)
|
67,966
|
|||||
Purchase
of Premises & Equipment
|
(7,395
|
)
|
(9,540
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
From Sales of Premises & Equipment
|
-
|
335
|
||||||
Net
Cash (Used In) Provided By Investing Activities
|
(16,258
|
)
|
60,365
|
|||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
Increase (Decrease) in Deposits
|
20,582
|
(72,064
|
)
|
|||||
Net
(Decrease) Increase in Short-Term Borrowings
|
(1,343
|
)
|
9,101
|
|||||
Increase
in Other Long-Term Borrowings
|
11,623
|
1,700
|
||||||
Repayment
of Other Long-Term Borrowings
|
(1,504
|
)
|
(3,323
|
)
|
||||
Dividends
Paid
|
(6,214
|
)
|
(6,475
|
)
|
||||
Repurchase
of Common Stock
|
(2,414
|
)
|
(23,219
|
)
|
||||
Issuance
of Common Stock
|
535
|
497
|
||||||
Net
Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities
|
21,265
|
(93,783
|
)
|
|||||
NET
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
41,761
|
(4,694
|
)
|
|||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
|
259,697
|
177,564
|
||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
|
$
|
301,458
|
$
|
172,870
|
||||
Supplemental
Disclosure:
|
||||||||
Interest
Paid on Deposits
|
$
|
18,607
|
$
|
22,103
|
||||
Interest
Paid on Debt
|
$
|
3,391
|
$
|
4,377
|
||||
Taxes
Paid
|
$
|
8,961
|
$
|
6,601
|
||||
Loans
Transferred to Other Real Estate Owned
|
$
|
4,467
|
$
|
1,490
|
||||
Issuance
of Common Stock as Non-Cash Compensation
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,158
|
The
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of
these statements.
CAPITAL
CITY BANK GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1
- SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
|
Basis
of Presentation
Capital
City Bank Group, Inc. (“CCBG” or the “Company”) provides a full range of banking
and banking-related services to individual and corporate clients through its
subsidiary, Capital City Bank, with banking offices located in Florida, Georgia,
and Alabama. The Company is subject to competition from other
financial institutions, is subject to regulation by certain government agencies
and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory
authorities.
The
unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared
by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, including Regulation S-X. Certain information
and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and
regulations. Prior period financial statements have been reformatted
and amounts reclassified, as necessary, to conform with the current
presentation. The Company and its subsidiary follow accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and reporting
practices applicable to the banking industry. The principles that
materially affect its financial position, results of operations and cash flows
are set forth in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements which are
included in the 2007 Form 10-K.
In the
opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements contain all
adjustments, which are those of a recurring nature, and disclosures necessary to
present fairly the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, the results of operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007.
NOTE
2 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES
|
|
The
amortized cost and related market value of investment securities
available-for-sale were as follows:
June
30, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Unrealized
Gains
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Market
Value
|
||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury
|
$
|
25,104
|
$
|
89
|
$
|
284
|
$
|
24,909
|
||||||||
U.S.
Government Agencies
|
19,526
|
197
|
5
|
19,718
|
||||||||||||
States
and Political Subdivisions
|
94,466
|
706
|
194
|
94,978
|
||||||||||||
Mortgage-Backed
Securities
|
34,097
|
128
|
485
|
33,740
|
||||||||||||
Other
Securities(1)
|
12,572
|
54
|
-
|
12,626
|
||||||||||||
Total
Investment Securities
|
$
|
185,765
|
$
|
1,174
|
$
|
968
|
$
|
185,971
|
December
31, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Unrealized
Gains
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Market
Value
|
||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury
|
$
|
16,216
|
$
|
97
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
16,313
|
||||||||
U.S.
Government Agencies
|
45,489
|
295
|
34
|
45,750
|
||||||||||||
States
and Political Subdivisions
|
90,014
|
164
|
177
|
90,001
|
||||||||||||
Mortgage-Backed
Securities
|
26,334
|
85
|
132
|
26,287
|
||||||||||||
Other
Securities(1)
|
12,307
|
61
|
-
|
12,368
|
||||||||||||
Total
Investment Securities
|
$
|
190,360
|
$
|
702
|
$
|
343
|
$
|
190,719
|
(1)
|
Includes Federal Home Loan
Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock recorded at cost of $6.7 million and
$4.8 million, respectively, at June 30, 2008, and $6.5 million and $4.8
million, respectively, at December 31,
2007.
|
NOTE
3 - LOANS
|
|
The
composition of the Company's loan portfolio was as follows:
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
June
30, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
||||||
Commercial,
Financial and Agricultural
|
$
|
196,075
|
$
|
208,864
|
||||
Real
Estate-Construction
|
150,907
|
142,248
|
||||||
Real
Estate-Commercial
|
622,282
|
634,920
|
||||||
Real
Estate-Residential
|
489,268
|
485,608
|
||||||
Real
Estate-Home Equity
|
205,536
|
192,428
|
||||||
Real
Estate-Loans Held-for-Sale
|
1,565
|
2,764
|
||||||
Consumer
|
251,182
|
249,018
|
||||||
Loans,
Net of Unearned Interest
|
$
|
1,916,815
|
$
|
1,915,850
|
Net
deferred fees included in loans at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were $1.8
million and $1.6 million, respectively.
Above
loan balances include loans in process with outstanding balances of $9.5 million
and $7.4 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively.
NOTE
4 - ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
An
analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the six month
periods ended June 30 was as follows:
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Balance,
Beginning of Period
|
$
|
18,066
|
$
|
17,217
|
||||
Provision
for Loan Losses
|
9,574
|
2,912
|
||||||
Recoveries
on Loans Previously Charged-Off
|
1,287
|
946
|
||||||
Loans
Charged-Off
|
(6,409
|
)
|
(3,606
|
)
|
||||
Balance,
End of Period
|
$
|
22,518
|
$
|
17,469
|
Impaired Loans. On
a non-recurring basis, loans are considered impaired when, based on current
information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all
amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan
agreement, including scheduled principal and interest
payments. Selected information pertaining to impaired loans is
depicted in the table below:
June
30, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
Balance
|
Valuation
Allowance
|
Balance
|
Valuation
Allowance
|
||||||||||||
Impaired
Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||
With
Related Valuation Allowance
|
$
|
28,344
|
$
|
7,429
|
$
|
21,615
|
$
|
4,702
|
||||||||
Without
Related Valuation Allowance
|
34,106
|
-
|
15,019
|
-
|
NOTE
5 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
|
The
Company had net intangible assets of $95.6 million and $98.6 million at June 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Intangible assets were as
follows:
June
30, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
Gross
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Gross
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
||||||||||||
Core
Deposit Intangibles
|
$
|
47,176
|
$
|
37,420
|
$
|
47,176
|
$
|
34,598
|
||||||||
Goodwill
|
84,811
|
-
|
84,811
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Customer
Relationship Intangible
|
1,867
|
783
|
1,867
|
688
|
||||||||||||
Total
Intangible Assets
|
$
|
133,854
|
$
|
38,203
|
$
|
133,854
|
$
|
35,286
|
Net Core Deposit
Intangibles: As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the
Company had net core deposit intangibles of $9.8 million and $12.6 million,
respectively. Amortization expense for the first six months of 2008
and 2007 was approximately $2.8 million. Estimated annual
amortization expense is $5.5 million.
Goodwill: As of
June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had goodwill, net of
accumulated amortization, of $84.8 million. Goodwill is the Company's
only intangible asset that is no longer subject to amortization under the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142,
“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”
Other: As of June
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had a customer relationship
intangible, net of accumulated amortization, of $1.1 million and $1.2 million,
respectively. This intangible was recorded as a result of the March
2004 acquisition of trust customer relationships from Synovus Trust
Company. Amortization expense for the first six months of 2008 and
2007 was approximately $96,000. Estimated annual amortization expense
is approximately $191,000 based on use of a 10-year useful life.
NOTE
6 - DEPOSITS
The
composition of the Company's interest bearing deposits at June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 was as follows:
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
June
30, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
||||||
NOW
Accounts
|
$
|
814,380
|
$
|
744,093
|
||||
Money
Market Accounts
|
387,011
|
386,619
|
||||||
Savings
Deposits
|
118,307
|
111,600
|
||||||
Other
Time Deposits
|
426,236
|
467,373
|
||||||
Total
Interest Bearing Deposits
|
$
|
1,745,934
|
$
|
1,709,685
|
NOTE
7 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
|
The
Company recognizes the cost of stock-based associate stock compensation in
accordance with SFAS No. 123R, "Share-Based Payment” (Revised) under the
fair value method.
As of
June 30, 2008, the Company had three stock-based compensation plans, consisting
of the 2005 Associate Incentive Plan ("AIP"), the 2005 Associate Stock Purchase
Plan ("ASPP"), and the 2005 Director Stock Purchase Plan
("DSPP"). Total compensation expense associated with these plans for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $208,000 and
$137,000, respectively. The Company, under the terms and conditions
of the AIP, maintained a 2011 Incentive Plan (“2011 Plan”) which was terminated
in March 2008 and approximately $577,000 in related expense accrued for this
plan was reversed during the first quarter of 2008.
AIP. The Company's
AIP allows the Company's Board of Directors to award key associates various
forms of equity-based incentive compensation. Under the AIP, the
Company adopted the Stock-Based Incentive Plan (the "2006 Incentive Plan"),
effective January 1, 2006, which was a performance-based equity bonus plan for
selected members of management, including all executive
officers. Under the 2006 Incentive Plan, all participants were
eligible to earn an equity award, in the form of performance shares, on an
annual basis over a term of five years. Annual awards were tied to an
internally established annual earnings target linked to the Company’s 2011
strategic initiative.
The
Company terminated the 2006 Incentive Plan in March 2008 in conjunction with the
termination of the Company’s 2011 strategic initiative. Due to the
performance targets not being met, no expense was recognized in 2008 or 2007 for
the 2006 Incentive Plan.
During
the first quarter of 2008, under the terms and conditions of the AIP, the
Company adopted a new Stock-Based Incentive Plan (the “2008 Incentive Plan”),
substantially similar to the 2006 Incentive Plan. All participants in
this plan are eligible to earn an equity award, in the form of restricted
stock. The award for 2008 is tied to internally established
performance goals. The grant-date fair value of the compensation
award for 2008 is approximately $561,000. In addition, each plan
participant is eligible to receive from the Company a tax supplement bonus equal
to 31% of the stock award value at the time of issuance. A total of
21,146 shares are eligible for issuance.
A total
of 875,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the
AIP. To date, the Company has issued a total of 60,892 shares of
common stock under the AIP.
Executive Stock Option
Agreement. For 2003 through 2006, under the provisions of the
AIP (and its predecessor), the Company's Board of Directors approved stock
option agreements for a key executive officer (William G. Smith, Jr. - Chairman,
President and CEO, CCBG). These agreements granted a non-qualified
stock option award upon achieving certain annual earnings per share conditions
set by the Board, subject to certain vesting requirements. The
options granted under the agreements have a term of ten years and vested at a
rate of one-third on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the
date of grant. Under the 2004 and 2003 agreements, 37,246 and 23,138
options, respectively, were issued, none of which have been
exercised. The fair value of a 2004 option was $13.42, and the fair
value of a 2003 option was $11.64. The exercise prices for the 2004
and 2003 options are $32.69 and $32.96, respectively. Under the 2006
and 2005 agreements, the earnings per share conditions were not met; therefore,
no options were granted and no expense was recognized related to these
agreements. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R and SFAS
123, the Company recognized expenses in 2005 through 2007 of approximately
$193,000, $205,000, and $125,000, respectively, related to the 2004 and 2003
agreements. In 2007, the Company replaced its practice of entering
into a stock option arrangement by establishing a Performance Share Unit Plan
under the provisions of the AIP that allows the executive to earn shares based
on the compound annual growth rate in diluted earnings per share over a
three-year period. The details of this program for the executive are
outlined in a Form 8-K filing dated January 31, 2007. No expense
related to this plan was recognized for the first six months of 2008 as results
fell short of the earnings performance goal.
A summary
of the status of the Company’s option shares as of June 30, 2008 is presented
below:
Options
|
Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2008
|
60,384 | $ | 32.79 | 6.9 | $ | - | ||||||||||
Granted
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Exercised
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Outstanding
at June 30, 2008
|
60,384 | $ | 32.79 | 6.4 | $ | - | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at June 30, 2008
|
60,384 | $ | 32.79 | 6.4 | $ | - |
As of
June 30, 2008, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to the option
shares granted under the agreements.
DSPP. The
Company's DSPP allows the directors to purchase the Company's common stock at a
price equal to 90% of the closing price on the date of
purchase. Stock purchases under the DSPP are limited to the amount of
the director’s annual cash compensation. The DSPP has 93,750 shares
reserved for issuance. A total of 39,817 shares have been issued
since the inception of the DSPP. For the first six months of 2008,
the Company recognized approximately $21,000 in expense related to this
plan. For the first six months of 2007, the Company recognized
approximately $23,000 in expense related to the DSPP.
ASPP. Under the
Company's ASPP, substantially all associates may purchase the Company's common
stock through payroll deductions at a price equal to 90% of the lower of the
fair market value at the beginning or end of each six-month offering
period. Stock purchases under the ASPP are limited to 10% of an
associate's eligible compensation, up to a maximum of $25,000 (fair market value
on each enrollment date) in any plan year. Shares are issued at the
beginning of the quarter following each six-month offering
period. The ASPP has 593,750 shares of common stock reserved for
issuance. A total of 69,749 shares have been issued since inception
of the ASPP. For the first six months of 2008, the Company recognized
approximately $58,000 in expense related to this plan. For the first
six months of 2007, the Company recognized $51,000 in expense related to the
ASPP.
Based on
the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the weighted average estimated fair
value of each of the purchase rights granted under the ASPP was $5.51 for the
first six months of 2008. For the first six months of 2007, the
weighted average fair value purchase right granted was $5.91. In
calculating compensation, the fair value of each stock purchase right was
estimated on the date of grant using the following weighted average
assumptions:
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Dividend
yield
|
2.8
|
%
|
2.0
|
%
|
||||
Expected
volatility
|
39.0
|
%
|
24.0
|
%
|
||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
3.1
|
%
|
4.9
|
%
|
||||
Expected
life (in years)
|
0.5
|
0.5
|
NOTE
8 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The
Company has a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all full-time
and eligible part-time associates and a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(“SERP”) covering its executive officers.
The
components of the net periodic benefit costs for the Company's qualified benefit
pension plan were as follows:
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||
Discount
Rate
|
6.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
||||||||
Long-Term
Rate of Return on Assets
|
8.00
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
||||||||
Service
Cost
|
$
|
1,279
|
$
|
1,350
|
$
|
2,558
|
$
|
2,700
|
||||||||
Interest
Cost
|
1,063
|
1,025
|
2,126
|
2,050
|
||||||||||||
Expected
Return on Plan Assets
|
(1,253
|
)
|
(1,300
|
)
|
(2,506
|
)
|
(2,600
|
)
|
||||||||
Prior
Service Cost Amortization
|
75
|
100
|
151
|
200
|
||||||||||||
Net
Loss Amortization
|
280
|
250
|
561
|
500
|
||||||||||||
Net
Periodic Benefit Cost
|
$
|
1,444
|
$
|
1,425
|
$
|
2,890
|
$
|
2,850
|
The
components of the net periodic benefit costs for the Company's SERP were as
follows:
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||
Discount
Rate
|
6.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
||||||||
Service
Cost
|
$
|
22
|
$
|
25
|
$
|
44
|
$
|
50
|
||||||||
Interest
Cost
|
56
|
63
|
111
|
126
|
||||||||||||
Prior
Service Cost Amortization
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
||||||||||||
Net
Loss Amortization
|
1
|
18
|
3
|
36
|
||||||||||||
Net
Periodic Benefit Cost
|
$
|
81
|
$
|
109
|
$
|
162
|
$
|
218
|
NOTE
9 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
Lending
Commitments. The Company is a party to financial instruments
with off-balance sheet risks in the normal course of business to meet the
financing needs of its clients. These financial instruments consist
of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.
The
Company’s maximum exposure to credit loss under standby letters of credit and
commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amount of those
instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in
establishing commitments and issuing letters of credit as it does for on-balance
sheet instruments. As of June 30, 2008, the amounts associated with
the Company’s off-balance sheet obligations were as follows:
(Dollars
in Millions)
|
Amount
|
|||
Commitments
to Extend Credit(1)
|
$
|
401
|
||
Standby
Letters of Credit
|
$
|
17
|
(1)
|
Commitments include unfunded
loans, revolving lines of credit, and other unused
commitments.
|
Commitments
to extend credit are agreements to lend to a client so long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may
require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected
to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Contingencies. The
Company is a party to lawsuits and claims arising out of the normal course of
business. In management's opinion, there are no known pending claims
or litigation, the outcome of which would, individually or in the aggregate,
have a material effect on the consolidated results of operations, financial
position, or cash flows of the Company.
Indemnification
Obligation. The Company is a member of the Visa U.S.A.
network. Visa U.S.A believes that its member banks are required to
indemnify Visa U.S.A. for potential future settlement of certain litigation (the
“Covered Litigation”). The Company recorded a charge in its fourth
quarter 2007 financial statements of approximately $1.9 million, or $0.07 per
diluted common share, to recognize its proportionate contingent liability
related to the costs of the judgments and settlements from the Covered
Litigation.
The
Company reversed a portion of the Covered Litigation accrual in the amount of
approximately $1.1 million to account for the establishment of an escrow account
by Visa Inc., the parent company of Visa U.S.A., in conjunction with Visa’s
initial public offering during the first quarter of 2008. This escrow
account was established to pay the costs of the judgments and settlements from
the Covered Litigation. Approximately $0.8 million remains accrued
for the contingent liability related to remaining Covered
Litigation.
NOTE
10 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
SFAS No.
130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income," requires that certain transactions and
other economic events that bypass the income statement be displayed as other
comprehensive income. Comprehensive income totaled $3.7 million and
$12.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
and $7.3 million and $14.6 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in
2007. The Company’s comprehensive income consists of net income and
changes in unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale (net of
income taxes) and changes in the pension liability (net of
taxes). The after-tax reduction in net unrealized gains on
securities totaled approximately ($1,065,000) and ($79,000), respectively, for
the three and six months ended June, 2008. The after-tax increase in
net unrealized losses on securities totaled approximately $585,000 and
$270,000, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30,
2007. Reclassification adjustments consist only of realized gains and
losses on sales of investment securities and were not material for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
NOTE
11 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements," for financial assets and
financial liabilities. In accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board Staff Position No. 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157," the Company will delay application of SFAS 157 for
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, until January 1,
2009. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157
defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A
fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or
transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability
or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the
asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous)
market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be
adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a
transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the
measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary
for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced
transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the
principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable,
(iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.
SFAS 157
requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market
approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. The market
approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market
transactions involving identical or comparable assets and
liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert
future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount on a
discounted basis. The cost approach is based on the amount that
currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset
(replacement cost). Valuation techniques should be consistently
applied. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the
assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability
developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or
unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions
about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability developed based on the best information available in the
circumstances. In that regard, SFAS 157 establishes a fair value
hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as
follows:
Level 1 Inputs -
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the
measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs - Inputs
other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the
asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active,
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
(such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by
correlation or other means.
Level 3 Inputs -
Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or
liabilities that reflect an entity's own assumptions about the assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.
A
description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair
value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the
valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. These valuation methodologies were
applied to all of the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities
carried at fair value effective January 1, 2008.
In
general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where
available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value
is based upon models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based
parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that
financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments
may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality, the Company’s
creditworthiness, among other things, as well as unobservable
parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently
over time. The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair
value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or
reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Company’s
valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market
participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the
fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate
of fair value at the reporting date.
Securities Available for
Sale. Securities classified as available for sale are reported
at fair value on a recurring basis utilizing Level 1, 2, or 3
inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value
measurements from an independent pricing service or a model that uses, as
inputs, observable market based parameters. The fair value
measurements consider observable data that may include quoted prices in active
markets, or other inputs, including dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows,
the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market
consensus prepayment speeds, and credit information and the bond's terms and
conditions.
The
following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2008, segregated by the level
of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair
value:
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
Level
1 Inputs
|
Level
2 Inputs
|
Level
3 Inputs
|
Total
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
Securities
Available for Sale
|
$ | 44,627 | $ | 128,718 | $ | 1,054 | $ | 174,399 |
The
change in the fair value of Level 3 securities from March 31, 2008 to June 30,
2008 relates to the change in an unrealized gain of approximately $54,000 for
one security.
Certain
financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on
an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain
circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of
impairment). Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at
fair value on a non-recurring basis were not significant at June 30,
2008.
Impaired Loans. On
a non-recurring basis, certain impaired loans are reported at the fair value of
the underlying collateral if repayment is expected solely from the
collateral. Collateral values are estimated using Level 3 inputs
based on customized discounting criteria. Impaired loans had a
carrying value of $62.5 million, with a valuation allowance of $7.4 million,
resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $2.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
Loans Held for
Sale. Loans held for sale, which are carried at the lower of
cost or fair value, are adjusted to fair value on a non-recurring
basis. Fair value is based on observable markets rates for comparable
loan products which is considered a level 2 fair value measurement.
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 159,
"The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities -
Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115." SFAS 159 permits
the Company to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified
election dates. Changes in fair value on items for which the fair
value measurement option has been elected are reported in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. The fair value option (i) is applied
instrument by instrument, with certain exceptions, thus the Company may record
identical financial assets and liabilities at fair value or by another
measurement basis permitted under generally accepted accounting principals,
(ii) is irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs) and (iii) is
applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of
instruments. Adoption of SFAS 159 on January 1, 2008 did
not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements because the
Company did not elect fair value measurement under SFAS 159.
NOTE
12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On July
31, 2008, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. and its subsidiary, Capital City Bank
entered into a marketing alliance with Elavon Inc., formerly NOVA Information
Systems, a wholly owned subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. Under this
alliance, Elavon purchased substantially all of Capital City Bank’s merchant
services business for $6.25 million. Elavon will provide merchant
bankcard processing to Capital City Bank clients going forward.
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
Second
|
First
|
Fourth
|
Third
|
Second
|
First
|
Fourth
|
Third
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary
of Operations:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
Income
|
$
|
36,260
|
$
|
38,723
|
$
|
40,786
|
$
|
41,299
|
$
|
41,724
|
$
|
41,514
|
$
|
42,600
|
$
|
42,512
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest
Expense
|
8,785
|
12,264
|
13,241
|
13,389
|
13,263
|
13,189
|
13,003
|
12,289
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Interest Income
|
27,475
|
26,459
|
27,545
|
27,910
|
28,461
|
28,325
|
29,597
|
30,223
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision
for Loan Losses
|
5,432
|
4,142
|
1,699
|
1,552
|
1,675
|
1,237
|
460
|
711
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Interest Income After
Provision
for Loan Losses
|
22,043
|
22,317
|
25,846
|
26,358
|
26,786
|
27,088
|
29,137
|
29,512
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest
Income
|
15,718
|
17,799
|
15,823
|
14,431
|
15,084
|
13,962
|
14,385
|
14,144
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest
Expense
|
30,756
|
29,798
|
31,614
|
29,919
|
29,897
|
30,562
|
29,984
|
30,422
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income
Before Provision for Income Taxes
|
7,005
|
10,318
|
10,055
|
10,870
|
11,973
|
10,488
|
13,538
|
13,234
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
2,195
|
3,038
|
2,391
|
3,699
|
4,082
|
3,531
|
4,688
|
4,554
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
4,810
|
$
|
7,280
|
$
|
7,664
|
$
|
7,171
|
$
|
7,891
|
$
|
6,957
|
$
|
8,850
|
$
|
8,680
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
Interest Income (FTE)
|
$
|
28,081
|
$
|
27,077
|
$
|
28,196
|
$
|
28,517
|
$
|
29,050
|
$
|
28,898
|
$
|
30,152
|
$
|
30,745
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Per
Common Share:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Income Basic
|
$
|
0.28
|
$
|
0.42
|
$
|
0.44
|
$
|
0.41
|
$
|
0.43
|
$
|
0.38
|
$
|
0.48
|
$
|
0.47
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
Income Diluted
|
0.28
|
0.42
|
0.44
|
0.41
|
0.43
|
0.38
|
0.48
|
0.47
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
Declared
|
.185
|
.185
|
.185
|
.175
|
.175
|
.175
|
.175
|
.163
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted
Book Value
|
17.33
|
17.33
|
17.03
|
16.95
|
16.87
|
16.97
|
17.01
|
17.18
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market
Price:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High
|
30.19
|
29.99
|
34.00
|
36.40
|
33.69
|
35.91
|
35.98
|
33.25
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low
|
21.76
|
24.76
|
24.60
|
27.69
|
29.12
|
29.79
|
30.14
|
29.87
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Close
|
21.76
|
29.00
|
28.22
|
31.20
|
31.34
|
33.30
|
35.30
|
31.10
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selected
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
$
|
1,908,802
|
$
|
1,909,574
|
$
|
1,908,069
|
$
|
1,907,235
|
$
|
1,944,969
|
$
|
1,980,224
|
$
|
2,003,719
|
$
|
2,025,112
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Earning
Assets
|
2,303,971
|
2,301,463
|
2,191,230
|
2,144,737
|
2,187,236
|
2,211,560
|
2,238,066
|
2,241,158
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
2,634,771
|
2,646,474
|
2,519,682
|
2,467,703
|
2,511,252
|
2,530,790
|
2,557,357
|
2,560,155
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
2,140,546
|
2,148,874
|
2,016,736
|
1,954,160
|
1,987,418
|
2,003,726
|
2,028,453
|
2,023,523
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareowners’
Equity
|
300,890
|
296,804
|
299,342
|
301,536
|
309,352
|
316,484
|
323,903
|
318,041
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Equivalent Shares:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
17,146
|
17,170
|
17,444
|
17,709
|
18,089
|
18,409
|
18,525
|
18,530
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
17,147
|
17,178
|
17,445
|
17,719
|
18,089
|
18,420
|
18,569
|
18,565
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ROA
|
.73
|
%
|
1.11
|
%
|
1.21
|
%
|
1.15
|
%
|
1.26
|
%
|
1.11
|
%
|
1.37
|
%
|
1.35
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
6.43
|
%
|
9.87
|
%
|
10.16
|
%
|
9.44
|
%
|
10.23
|
%
|
8.91
|
%
|
10.84
|
%
|
10.83
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
Interest Margin (FTE)
|
4.90
|
%
|
4.73
|
%
|
5.10
|
%
|
5.27
|
%
|
5.33
|
%
|
5.29
|
%
|
5.35
|
%
|
5.45
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency
Ratio
|
66.89
|
%
|
63.15
|
%
|
68.51
|
%
|
66.27
|
%
|
64.44
|
%
|
67.90
|
%
|
63.99
|
%
|
64.35
|
%
|
Item
2.
|
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Management’s
discussion and analysis ("MD&A") provides supplemental information, which
sets forth the major factors that have affected our financial condition and
results of operations and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated
Financial Statements and related notes. The MD&A is divided into
subsections entitled "Business Overview," "Financial Overview," "Results of
Operations," "Financial Condition," "Liquidity and Capital Resources,"
"Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements," and "Accounting Policies." The
following information should provide a better understanding of the major factors
and trends that affect our earnings performance and financial condition, and how
our performance during 2008 compares with prior years. Throughout
this section, Capital City Bank Group, Inc., and subsidiaries, collectively, are
referred to as "CCBG," "Company," "we," "us," or "our."
In this
MD&A, we present an operating efficiency ratio and an operating net
noninterest expense as a percent of average assets ratio, both of which are not
calculated based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States ("GAAP"), but that we believe provide important information regarding our
results of operations. Our calculation of the operating efficiency
ratio is computed by dividing noninterest expense less intangible amortization
and merger expenses, by the sum of tax equivalent net interest income and
noninterest income. We calculate our operating net noninterest
expense as a percent of average assets by subtracting noninterest expense
excluding intangible amortization and merger expenses from noninterest
income. Management uses these non-GAAP measures as part of its
assessment of its performance in managing noninterest expenses. We
believe that excluding intangible amortization and merger expenses in our
calculations better reflect our periodic expenses and is more reflective of
normalized operations.
Although
we believe the above-mentioned non-GAAP financial measures enhance investors’
understanding of our business and performance, these non-GAAP financial measures
should not be considered an alternative to GAAP. In addition, there
are material limitations associated with the use of these non-GAAP financial
measures such as the risks that readers of our financial statements may disagree
as to the appropriateness of items included or excluded in these measures and
that our measures may not be directly comparable to other companies that
calculate these measures differently. Our management compensates for
these limitations by providing detailed reconciliations between GAAP information
and the non-GAAP financial measure as detailed below.
Reconciliation
of operating efficiency ratio to efficiency ratio:
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Efficiency
ratio
|
68.29 | % | 69.50 | % | ||||
Effect
of intangible amortization expense
|
(3.29 | )% | (3.35 | )% | ||||
Operating
efficiency ratio
|
65.00 | % | 66.15 | % |
Reconciliation
of operating net noninterest expense ratio:
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Net
noninterest expense as a percent of average assets
|
2.06 | % | 2.51 | % | ||||
Effect
of intangible amortization expense
|
(0.22 | )% | (0.23 | )% | ||||
Operating
net noninterest expense as a percent of average assets
|
1.84 | % | 2.28 | % |
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q.
CAUTION
CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including this MD&A section, contains
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements
include, among others, statements about our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals,
expectations, estimates and intentions that are subject to significant risks and
uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, many of which
are beyond our control. The words "may," "could," "should," "would," "believe,"
"anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "target," "goal," and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements.
All
forward-looking statements, by their nature, are subject to risks and
uncertainties. Our actual future results may differ materially from
those set forth in our forward-looking statements. Please see the
Introductory Note and Item 1A.
Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated in our
subsequent quarterly reports filed on Form 10-Q, and in our other filings made
from time to time with the SEC after the date of this report.
However,
other factors besides those listed in our Quarterly Report or in our Annual
Report also could adversely affect our results, and you should not consider any
such list of factors to be a complete set of all potential risks or
uncertainties. Any forward-looking statements made by us or on our
behalf speak only as of the date they are made. We do not undertake
to update any forward-looking statement, except as required by applicable
law.
BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
We are a
financial holding company headquartered in Tallahassee, Florida, and we are the
parent of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Capital City Bank (the "Bank" or
"CCB"). The Bank offers a broad array of products and services
through a total of 69 full-service offices and one mortgage lending office
located in Florida, Georgia, and Alabama. The Bank offers commercial
and retail banking services, as well as trust and asset management, merchant
services, retail securities brokerage and data processing services.
Our
profitability, like most financial institutions, is dependent to a large extent
upon net interest income, which is the difference between the interest received
on earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest paid on
interest-bearing liabilities, principally deposits and
borrowings. Results of operations are also affected by the provision
for loan losses, operating expenses such as salaries and employee benefits,
occupancy and other operating expenses including income taxes, and noninterest
income such as service charges on deposit accounts, asset management and trust
fees, retail securities brokerage fees, mortgage banking revenues, merchant
service fees, and data processing revenues.
Our
philosophy is to grow and prosper, building long-term relationships based on
quality service, high ethical standards, and safe and sound banking
practices. We maintain a locally oriented, community-based focus,
which is augmented by experienced, centralized support in select specialized
areas. Our local market orientation is reflected in our network of
banking office locations, experienced community executives with a dedicated
president for each market, and community boards which support our focus on
responding to local banking needs. We strive to offer a broad array
of sophisticated products and to provide quality service by empowering
associates to make decisions in their local markets.
Our
long-term vision is to continue our expansion, emphasizing a combination of
growth in existing markets and acquisitions. Acquisitions will
continue to be focused on a three state area including Florida, Georgia, and
Alabama with a particular focus on financial institutions, which are $100
million to $400 million in asset size and generally located on the outskirts of
major metropolitan areas. Six markets have been identified, five in
Florida and one in Georgia, in which management will proactively pursue
expansion opportunities. These markets include Alachua, Marion,
Hernando, and Pasco Counties in Florida, the western panhandle in Florida, and
Bibb and surrounding counties in central Georgia. We continue to
evaluate de novo expansion opportunities in attractive new markets in the event
that acquisition opportunities are not feasible. Expansion
opportunities that will be evaluated include asset management and mortgage
banking.
FINANCIAL
OVERVIEW
A summary
overview of our financial performance for 2008 versus 2007 is provided
below.
Financial
Performance Highlights –
·
|
Earnings
of $4.8 million ($0.28 per diluted share) for the second quarter of 2008
compared to $7.9 million ($0.43 per diluted share) for the second quarter
of 2007. Earnings of $12.1 million ($0.70 per diluted share)
compared to $14.8 million ($0.81 per diluted share) for the same period in
2007. The decline in earnings for both periods was driven by
lower net interest income and higher loan loss
provisions.
|
·
|
Tax
equivalent net interest income declined 3.3% and 4.8% for the three and
six month periods reflective of margin compression driven by an increased
level of foregone interest associated with a higher level of nonperforming
loans and an unfavorable shift in the mix of earning assets reflective of
a decline in loan balances.
|
·
|
Noninterest
income grew 4.2% for the three month period reflective of higher deposit
fees and retail brokerage fees. For the first half of 2008, the
redemption of Visa Inc. shares ($2.4 million) drove a 15.4% increase over
the same period in 2007. Deposit fees and bank card fees also
posted strong gains.
|
·
|
Noninterest
expense continues to be well controlled as evidenced by increases of $.9
million, or 2.9%, and $.1 million, or .16% for the three and six month
periods. Noninterest expense for the first half of 2008
included the reversal of $1.1 million in our Visa Inc. litigation
accrual.
|
·
|
Higher
loan loss provision for both the three and six month periods is due to the
current economic slowdown and the impact of the stressed housing and real
estate markets. The allowance for loan losses continues to be
adequately funded at 1.18% of total loans compared to .91% in the same
period in 2007.
|
·
|
We
remain well-capitalized with a risk based capital ratio of 14.35% and a
tangible capital ratio of 7.87%.
|
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Net
Income
Net
income for the second quarter of 2008 totaled $4.8 million ($0.28 per diluted
share) compared to $7.3 million ($0.42 per diluted share) in the first quarter
of 2008 and $7.9 million ($0.43 per diluted share) for the second quarter of
2007. Earnings for the second quarter of 2008 include a loan loss
provision of $5.4 million ($.20 per diluted share) versus $4.1 million ($.15 per
diluted share) in the first quarter of 2008 and $1.7 million ($.06 per diluted
share) in the second quarter of 2007.
Earnings
for the first half of 2008 totaled $12.1 million ($0.70 per diluted share)
compared to $14.8 million ($0.81 per diluted share) for the first half of
2007. Year-to-date earnings include a loan loss provision of $9.6
million ($0.34 per diluted share). Current year earnings also include
a $2.4 million pre-tax gain from the redemption of Visa Inc. shares related to
its initial public offering, the reversal of $1.1 million (pre-tax) in Visa
related litigation reserves, the reversal of $577,000 (pre-tax) in accrued
expense for our 2011 Incentive Plan, and the reversal of a $425,000 tax reserve
related to the resolution of a tax contingency, all four of which were recorded
in the first quarter.
A
condensed earnings summary is presented below:
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||
Interest
Income
|
$
|
36,260
|
$
|
41,724
|
$
|
74,983
|
$
|
83,238
|
||||||||
Taxable
Equivalent Adjustment(1)
|
606
|
589
|
1,225
|
1,162
|
||||||||||||
Interest
Income (FTE)
|
36,866
|
42,313
|
76,208
|
84,400
|
||||||||||||
Interest
Expense
|
8,785
|
13,263
|
21,049
|
26,452
|
||||||||||||
Net
Interest Income (FTE)
|
28,081
|
29,050
|
55,159
|
57,948
|
||||||||||||
Provision
for Loan Losses
|
5,432
|
1,675
|
9,574
|
2,912
|
||||||||||||
Taxable
Equivalent Adjustment
|
606
|
589
|
1,225
|
1,162
|
||||||||||||
Net
Interest Income After Provision
|
22,043
|
26,786
|
44,360
|
53,874
|
||||||||||||
Noninterest
Income
|
15,718
|
15,084
|
33,517
|
29,046
|
||||||||||||
Noninterest
Expense
|
30,756
|
29,897
|
60,554
|
60,459
|
||||||||||||
Income
Before Income Taxes
|
7,005
|
11,973
|
17,323
|
22,461
|
||||||||||||
Income
Taxes
|
2,195
|
4,082
|
5,233
|
7,613
|
||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
4,810
|
$
|
7,891
|
$
|
12,090
|
$
|
14,848
|
||||||||
Basic
Net Income Per Share
|
$
|
0.28
|
$
|
0.43
|
$
|
0.70
|
$
|
0.81
|
||||||||
Diluted
Net Income Per Share
|
$
|
0.28
|
$
|
0.43
|
$
|
0.70
|
$
|
0.81
|
||||||||
Return
on Average Assets(2)
|
.73
|
%
|
1.26
|
%
|
.92
|
%
|
1.19
|
%
|
||||||||
Return
on Average Equity(2)
|
6.43
|
%
|
10.23
|
%
|
8.14
|
%
|
9.57
|
%
|
(1)
|
Computed using a statutory tax
rate of 35%
|
(2)
|
Annualized
|
Net
Interest Income
Net
interest income represents our single largest source of earnings and is equal to
interest income and fees generated by earning assets, less interest expense paid
on interest bearing liabilities. Tax equivalent net interest income
for the second quarter of 2008 was $28.1 million compared to $29.0 million for
the second quarter of 2007. For the first six months of 2008, tax
equivalent net interest income totaled $55.2 million compared to $57.9 million
for the comparable period in 2007. Table I on page 33 provides a
comparative analysis of our average balances and interest rates.
The
decline in net interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
as compared to the same periods of 2007 was primarily the result of a higher
level of foregone interest associated with the increased level of nonperforming
assets and an unfavorable shift in the mix of earning assets as the loan
balances declined throughout the first nine months of 2007. These
factors, coupled with the influx of higher cost municipal deposits in 2008, led
to compression in our net interest margin of 43 and 50 basis points,
respectively.
Average
negotiated deposits, which include municipal deposits, have grown from $287
million in the second quarter of 2007 to $538 million in the current
quarter. Although this growth in deposits has had a positive impact
on net interest income, it has had an adverse impact on our margin due to the
relatively thin spreads on the municipal deposits. See “Financial
Condition” section below for a more detailed analysis of nonperforming assets
and deposit growth.
For the
second quarter of 2008, taxable-equivalent interest income decreased $5.4
million, or 12.9%, from the second quarter in 2007. During the first
half of 2008, taxable-equivalent interest income declined $8.2 million, or 9.7%
from the comparable period in 2007. The decrease in each respective
period was attributable to lower yields resulting from the Federal Reserve rate
cuts, a shift in mix on earning assets and a higher level of foregone interest
associated with the increased level of nonperforming loans. The
average yield on earning assets declined 133 and 101 basis points over the three
and six month periods, respectively.
Interest
expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 decreased $4.5
million, or 33.8% and $5.4 million, or 20.4%, respectively, from the comparable
prior year periods. For the same comparable periods, the average cost
of funds has decreased 90 and 58 points, respectively. Since
September 2007, we have aggressively reduced our deposit rates in response to
the rate reductions initiated by the Federal Reserve and continue to believe we
have been successful in neutralizing these rate reductions. However,
the rapid growth in the higher cost negotiated deposits (primarily public funds)
mitigated the full impact of lowering our deposit rates and, therefore, the
decline in our average cost of funds was not commensurate with the decline in
our average yield on earning assets.
Our
interest rate spread (defined as the average fully taxable-equivalent yield on
earning assets less the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities) for
the second quarter of 2008 was 4.55% compared to 4.64% for the second quarter of
2007. For the first half of 2008, the interest rate spread was 4.41%
compared to 4.62% in the comparable period of 2007. The decline for
each of the aforementioned periods reflects the shift in earning assets, lower
yields due to the Federal Reserve rate cuts and the higher level of
nonperforming loans, partially offset by the lower cost of funds.
Our net
yield on earning assets (defined as fully taxable-equivalent net interest income
divided by average earning assets) was 4.90% and 4.81%, respectively, for the
three and six month periods of 2008, versus 5.33% and 5.31%, respectively, for
the comparable periods in 2007. For both comparable periods, the
margin decrease is primarily attributable to the factors noted above plus the
recent influx of higher cost negotiated deposits.
Provision
for Loan Losses
The
provision for loan losses for the current quarter was $5.4 million compared to
$1.7 million for the second quarter of 2007. The provision for the
first six months of 2008 totaled $9.6 million compared to $2.9 million for the
same period in 2007. The increase in the provision for both periods
generally reflects the current economic slowdown and the impact of the stressed
housing and real estate markets on our loan portfolio. For the first
half of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007, the increase in the loan loss
provision specifically reflects a higher level of required reserves for all loan
types with the exception of our home equity loan portfolio. A
majority of the increase in required reserves was driven by stress on our
residential real estate and consumer (indirect auto) portfolios reflective of
the impact of the aforementioned economic and real estate market
slowdowns.
Net
charge-offs totaled $3.2 million, or .67% of average loans for the second
quarter of 2008 compared to $1.3 million, or .27% for the second quarter of
2007. For the six month period ended June 30, 2008, net charge-offs
totaled $5.1 million, or .54%, of average loans compared to $2.7 million or .27%
of average loans for the same period in 2007. The increase in net
charge offs for both of the aforementioned periods primarily reflects a higher
level of consumer (indirect auto) and commercial real estate loan
charge-offs.
Charge-off
activity for the respective periods is set forth below:
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||
CHARGE-OFFS
|
||||||||||||||||
Commercial,
Financial and Agricultural
|
$
|
407
|
$
|
253
|
$
|
1,043
|
$
|
813
|
||||||||
Real
Estate – Construction
|
158
|
-
|
730
|
108
|
||||||||||||
Real
Estate – Commercial
|
1,115
|
5
|
1,241
|
331
|
||||||||||||
Real
Estate – Residential
|
817
|
992
|
993
|
1,059
|
||||||||||||
Consumer
|
1,232
|
534
|
2,402
|
1,295
|
||||||||||||
Total
Charge-offs
|
3,729
|
1,784
|
6,409
|
3,606
|
||||||||||||
RECOVERIES
|
||||||||||||||||
Commercial,
Financial and Agricultural
|
55
|
47
|
195
|
83
|
||||||||||||
Real
Estate – Construction
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Real
Estate – Commercial
|
13
|
5
|
14
|
10
|
||||||||||||
Real
Estate – Residential
|
24
|
26
|
28
|
27
|
||||||||||||
Consumer
|
446
|
392
|
1,051
|
826
|
||||||||||||
Total
Recoveries
|
538
|
470
|
1,288
|
946
|
||||||||||||
Net
Charge-offs
|
$
|
3,191
|
$
|
1,314
|
$
|
5,121
|
$
|
2,660
|
||||||||
Net
Charge-offs (Annualized) as a
|
||||||||||||||||
Percent
of Average Loans Outstanding,
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
of Unearned Interest
|
.67
|
%
|
.27
|
%
|
.54
|
%
|
.27
|
%
|
Noninterest
Income
Noninterest
income increased $634,000, or 4.2%, and $4.5 million, or 15.4%, respectively,
over the comparable three and six month periods in 2007. The increase
in the current quarter reflects higher deposit fees and retail brokerage fees
partially offset by a decrease in mortgage banking revenues. The
increase for the six month period is attributable to a pre-tax gain of $2.4
million from the redemption of Visa Inc. shares as well as higher deposit and
bank card fees of $1.4 million and $878,000, respectively.
Noninterest
income represented 36.4% and 38.3% of operating revenue, respectively, for the
three and six month periods of 2008 compared to 34.6% and 33.8%, respectively,
for the same periods in 2007. The improvement for both periods
reflects the aforementioned increase in noninterest income and a lower level of
net interest income contribution.
The table
below reflects the major components of noninterest income.
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||
Noninterest
Income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Service
Charges on Deposit Accounts
|
$
|
7,060
|
$
|
6,442
|
$
|
13,825
|
$
|
12,487
|
||||||||
Data
Processing
|
812
|
790
|
1,625
|
1,505
|
||||||||||||
Fees
for Trust Services
|
1,125
|
1,175
|
2,275
|
2,400
|
||||||||||||
Retail
Brokerage Fees
|
735
|
804
|
1,204
|
1,266
|
||||||||||||
Invest
Sec Gain (Losses)
|
30
|
-
|
95
|
7
|
||||||||||||
Mortgage
Banking Revenues
|
506
|
850
|
1,000
|
1,529
|
||||||||||||
Merchant
Service Fees (1)
|
2,074
|
1,892
|
4,282
|
3,828
|
||||||||||||
Interchange
Fees (1)
|
1,076
|
951
|
2,085
|
1,861
|
||||||||||||
ATM/Debit
Card Fees (1)
|
758
|
661
|
1,502
|
1,302
|
||||||||||||
Other
|
1,542
|
1,519
|
5,624
|
2,861
|
||||||||||||
Total
Noninterest Income
|
$
|
15,718
|
$
|
15,084
|
$
|
33,517
|
$
|
29,046
|
(1)
Together called “Bank Card Fees”
Various
significant components of noninterest income are discussed in more detail
below.
Service Charges on Deposit
Accounts. Deposit service charge fees increased $618,000, or
9.6%, and $1.3 million, or 10.7%, respectively, over the comparable three and
six month periods in 2007. The increase for both periods reflects a
higher level of overdraft and nonsufficient funds activity.
Asset Management
Fees. Fees from asset management activities decreased $50,000,
or 4.3%, and $125,000, or 5.2%, respectively, for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2008. The decline for both periods is due to a
reduction in assets under management primarily reflective of a decline in market
values for discretionary managed accounts and account attrition related to the
resolution of trust and estate accounts. At June 30, 2008, assets
under management totaled $719.3 million compared to $767.8 million at the end of
the second quarter of 2007.
Mortgage Banking
Revenues. Mortgage banking revenues declined $344,000, or
40.5%, and $529,000, or 34.6%, respectively, from the three and six month
periods in 2007 reflective of current economic conditions and the housing market
slowdown.
Bank Card
Fees. Bank card fees (including merchant services fees,
interchange fees, and ATM/debit card fees) increased $404,000, or 11.5%, and
$878,000, or 12.6%, respectively, over the three and six month periods of 2007
reflective of higher transaction volumes.
Other. Other
income increased $23,000, or 1.5% from the second quarter of 2007 due to higher
fees for accounts receivable financing. For the first half of 2008,
other income increased $2.8 million, or 96.6% due primarily to a $2.4 million
gain from the redemption of Visa Inc. shares related to their initial public
offering. Higher fees received for accounts receivable financing and
gains from the sale of other real estate also contributed to the
increase.
Noninterest
Expense
Noninterest
expense increased $859,000, or 2.9%, and $.1 million, or .16%, respectively,
over the comparable three and six month periods in 2007. The increase
in the current quarter was driven by an increase in compensation and occupancy
costs. For the first six months of 2008, the increase was primarily
due to the aforementioned higher compensation and occupancy expense, with a
one-time reversal of our Visa Inc. litigation accrual ($1.1 million)
substantially offsetting those increases. Higher expense for
commission fees related to processing cost for our accounts receivable financing
product also increased over this period. Management continues to work
on expense reduction opportunities and improvement in cost controls as a core
strategic objective.
The table
below reflects the major components of noninterest expense.
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest
Expense:
|
|||||||||||||||
Salaries
|
$
|
12,627
|
$
|
12,286
|
$
|
25,631
|
$
|
24,629
|
|||||||
Associate
Benefits
|
2,691
|
2,706
|
5,291
|
6,082
|
|||||||||||
Total
Compensation
|
15,318
|
14,992
|
30,922
|
30,711
|
|||||||||||
Premises
|
2,491
|
2,324
|
4,853
|
4,560
|
|||||||||||
Equipment
|
2,583
|
2,494
|
5,165
|
4,843
|
|||||||||||
Total
Occupancy
|
5,074
|
4,818
|
10,018
|
9,403
|
|||||||||||
Legal
Fees
|
474
|
429
|
976
|
935
|
|||||||||||
Professional
Fees
|
948
|
872
|
1,819
|
1,864
|
|||||||||||
Processing
Services
|
434
|
622
|
895
|
1,004
|
|||||||||||
Advertising
|
895
|
1,004
|
1,673
|
1,868
|
|||||||||||
Travel
and Entertainment
|
341
|
400
|
674
|
745
|
|||||||||||
Printing
and Supplies
|
522
|
584
|
1,037
|
1,098
|
|||||||||||
Telephone
|
701
|
536
|
1,294
|
1,083
|
|||||||||||
Postage
|
435
|
309
|
864
|
649
|
|||||||||||
Intangible
Amortization
|
1,459
|
1,458
|
2,917
|
2,917
|
|||||||||||
Interchange
Fees
|
1,738
|
1,573
|
3,587
|
3,242
|
|||||||||||
Commission
Fees
|
443
|
220
|
845
|
443
|
|||||||||||
Courier
Service
|
117
|
247
|
244
|
524
|
|||||||||||
Miscellaneous
|
1,857
|
1,833
|
2,789
|
3,973
|
|||||||||||
Total
Other
|
10,364
|
10,087
|
19,614
|
20,345
|
|||||||||||
Total
Noninterest Expense
|
$
|
30,756
|
$
|
29,897
|
$
|
60,554
|
$
|
60,459
|
Various
significant components of noninterest expense are discussed in more detail
below.
Compensation. Salaries
and associate benefit expense increased $326,000, or 2.2%, and $211,000, or
.69%, respectively, over the comparable three and six month periods in
2007. The increase in compensation for both periods is attributable
to higher associate base salaries reflective of annual merit/market based raises
and the opening of three new banking offices in 2007. For the six
month period, a decline in pension expense and stock based compensation
partially offset the aforementioned increase in associate base
salaries. The lower pension expense generally reflects the positive
impact of aggressive plan funding in prior years. The decline in
stock based compensation is due to the reversal of $577,000 in accrued expense
during the first quarter of 2008 related to the termination of our 2011
Incentive Plan.
Occupancy. Occupancy
expense (including premises and equipment) increased $256,000, or 5.3%, and
$615,000, or 6.5%, respectively from the comparable three and six month periods
in 2007. For both periods, the increase was due to higher
depreciation expense and maintenance and repair expense for furniture, fixtures,
and equipment. The increase in depreciation expense reflects the
addition of capitalized assets related to new banking offices opened during
2007, the purchase of a new phone system in early 2008, and the upgrade of
banking office security equipment during the first half of 2008. The
increase in maintenance and repair expense is primarily related to higher
expense for maintenance agreements in part due to the opening of new banking
offices, but more significantly, maintenance related to the purchase of new
software during 2007.
Other. Other
noninterest expense increased $277,000, or 2.7%, from the second quarter of 2007
due primarily to higher processing fees for our accounts receivable financing
product. For the first half of 2008, other noninterest expense
decreased $731,000, or 3.6%, due to the reversal of $1.1 million of litigation
reserve related to certain Visa Inc. litigation which was accrued for in the
fourth quarter of 2007. Approximately $800,000 remains accrued for
Visa Inc. litigation. The aforementioned increase in processing fees
for our accounts receivable financing product and higher expense for other real
estate holding costs and repossession expenses partially offset the
aforementioned reversal in litigation reserve.
Operating
net noninterest expense (noninterest income minus noninterest expense, excluding
intangible amortization expenses) as a percent of average assets was 1.84% for
the first half of 2008 compared to 2.28% for the first half of
2007. Our operating efficiency ratio (noninterest expense, excluding
intangible amortization expense, expressed as a percent of the sum of
taxable-equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income) was 65.00% for
the first half of 2008 compared to 66.15% for the same period in
2007. The variances in these metrics include the impact of Visa Inc.
related entries.
Income
Taxes
The
provision for income taxes decreased $1.9 million, or 46.2%, and $2.4 million,
or 31.3%, respectively, from the comparable three and six month periods of 2007,
reflecting lower taxable income. The six month period was also
affected by the resolution of a tax contingency that occurred during the first
quarter of 2008. Our effective tax rate for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008 was 31.34% and 30.21%, respectively,
compared to 34.09% and 33.89%, respectively, for the same periods in
2007. The variance in our effective tax rate for both periods was
driven by a lower level of taxable income, primarily reflective of our higher
loan loss provisions, in relation to the size of our permanent book/tax
differences. In addition, the six month period was also affected by
the tax reserve adjustment previously mentioned.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
Average
assets increased $115.1 million, or 4.57%, to $2.635 billion for the
quarter-ended June 30, 2008 from $2.520 billion in the fourth quarter of
2007. Average earning assets of $2.304 billion increased $112.7
million, or 5.15%, from the fourth quarter of 2007. The increase was
primarily due to an increase in short-term investments reflective of an increase
in our client deposit balances (see discussion below). We discuss
balance sheet variances in more detail below.
Funds
Sold
We ended
the second quarter with approximately $195.5 million in average net overnight
funds sold, compared to $84.1 million net average overnight funds sold in the
fourth quarter of 2007. An increase in public funds deposits was the
primary factor driving the growth in overnight funds for the first half of the
year.
Investment
Securities
Our
investment portfolio is a significant component of our operations and, as such,
it functions as a key element of liquidity and asset/liability
management. As of June 30, 2008, the average investment portfolio
decreased $1.8 million, or .95%, from the fourth quarter of 2007. We
will continue to evaluate the need to purchase securities for the investment
portfolio for the remainder of 2008, taking into consideration the Bank’s
overall liquidity position and pledging requirements.
Securities
classified as available-for-sale are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains
and losses associated with these securities are recorded, net of tax, as a
separate component of shareowners’ equity. At June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, shareowners’ equity included a net unrealized gain of
$167,000 and $246,000, respectively.
Loans
Average
loans increased $733,000, or .04% from the fourth quarter of 2007 due to a
steady pace of new loan production. Our loan balances so far in 2008
have been stable despite the current operating environment and economic
conditions, and reflect the diversity of our loan products and the variety of
quality lending opportunities that we believe our banking relationships and
markets continue to offer. The lack of more significant loan growth
is not unexpected given our credit underwriting discipline in the current
environment.
Nonperforming
Assets
Nonperforming
assets of $47.8 million increased from the fourth quarter of 2007 by $19.6
million. Nonaccrual loans increased $16.6 million from the same
period in the prior year. These increases are primarily the result of
the addition of three real estate loan relationships totaling $9.8 million
during the first quarter and the addition of several smaller balance residential
real estate loans to builders and investors during the second
quarter. The three large real estate loan relationships previously
mentioned are non-coastal related real estate
developments. Management believes that these additions have been
adequately reserved for at quarter-end. Restructured loans totaled
$1.7 million at the end of the second quarter. Other real estate
owned totaled $4.3 million at the end of the quarter compared to $3.0 million at
year-end 2007. Nonperforming assets represented 2.49% of loans and
other real estate at the end of the first quarter compared to 1.47% at year-end
2007.
Management
performs a detailed review and valuation assessment of impaired loans on a
quarterly basis and, in accordance with its current charge-off procedures,
writes existing nonaccrual loans down to fair value when principal is deemed
uncollectible. Increased resources have been allocated to this
process to review impaired loans migrating through the foreclosure process and
record write-downs on these loans as market conditions change. Due to
elevated case loads, it is taking longer for foreclosure cases to move through
the court system and, therefore, where appropriate, we are recognizing losses
prior to the final resolution of the legal process for problem
assets.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
We
maintain an allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to provide for the
estimated credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet
date. Credit losses arise from borrowers’ inability or unwillingness
to repay, and from other risks inherent in the lending process, including
collateral risk, operations risk, concentration risk and economic
risk. All related risks of lending are considered when assessing the
adequacy of the loan loss reserve. The allowance for loan losses is
established through a provision charged to expense. Loans are charged
against the allowance when management believes collection of the principal is
unlikely. The allowance for loan losses is based on management's
judgment of overall loan quality. This is a significant estimate
based on a detailed analysis of the loan portfolio. The balance can
and will change based on changes in the assessment of the portfolio's overall
credit quality. We evaluate the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis.
The
allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2008 was $22.5 million, compared to $18.1
million at December 31, 2007. At June 30, 2008, the allowance
represented 1.18% of outstanding loans (net of overdrafts) and provided coverage
of 52% of nonperforming loans, compared to 0.95% and 72%, respectively at
December 31, 2007. The increase in the allowance for loan losses was
driven by a higher level of required reserves for our residential real estate
and consumer loan portfolios. As previously mentioned, current
economic conditions and stress within our real estate markets has had an adverse
impact on our consumer borrowers and borrowers who derive their revenue or
personal incomes from the real estate industry. While there can be no
assurance that we will not sustain loan losses in a particular period that are
substantial in relation to the size of the allowance, our assessment of the loan
portfolio does not indicate a likelihood of this occurrence. It is
management’s opinion that the allowance at June 30, 2008 is adequate to absorb
losses inherent in the loan portfolio at quarter-end.
Deposits
Average
total deposits were $2.141 billion for the second quarter of 2008, an increase
of $123.8 million, or 6.1%, over the fourth quarter of 2007. The
increase was driven by strong growth in negotiated NOW accounts, primarily
public funds deposits which began migrating late in the fourth quarter from the
Florida State Board of Administration’s Local Government Investment Pool to
Capital City Bank. Partially offsetting this increase was a decline
in money market accounts and certificates of deposit.
The ratio
of average noninterest bearing deposits to total deposits was 19.4% for the
second quarter of 2008, compared to 20.8% for the fourth quarter of
2007. For the same periods, the ratio of average interest bearing
liabilities to average earning assets was 81.5% and 80.0%,
respectively.
Market
Risk and Interest Rate Sensitivity
Overview
Our net
income is largely dependent on net interest income. Net interest income is
susceptible to interest rate risk to the degree that interest-bearing
liabilities mature or reprice on a different basis than interest-earning assets.
When interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice more quickly than
interest-earning assets in a given period, a significant increase in market
rates of interest could adversely affect net interest income. Similarly, when
interest-earning assets mature or reprice more quickly than interest-bearing
liabilities, falling interest rates could result in a decrease in net interest
income. Net interest income is also affected by changes in the portion of
interest-earning assets that are funded by interest-bearing liabilities rather
than by other sources of funds, such as noninterest-bearing deposits and
shareowners’ equity.
We have
established a comprehensive interest rate risk management policy, which is
administered by management’s Asset Liability Management Committee
(ALCO). The policy establishes limits of risk, which are quantitative
measures of the percentage change in net interest income (a measure of net
interest income at risk) and the fair value of equity capital (a measure of
economic value of equity (“EVE”) at risk) resulting from a hypothetical change
in interest rates for maturities from one day to 30 years. We measure
the potential adverse impacts that changing interest rates may have on its
short-term earnings, long-term value, and liquidity by employing simulation
analysis through the use of computer modeling. The simulation model
captures optionality factors such as call features and interest rate caps and
floors imbedded in investment and loan portfolio contracts. As with
any method of gauging interest rate risk, there are certain shortcomings
inherent in the interest rate modeling methodology used by us. When
interest rates change, actual movements in different categories of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, loan prepayments, and
withdrawals of time and other deposits, may deviate significantly from
assumptions used in the model. Finally, the methodology does not
measure or reflect the impact that higher rates may have on adjustable-rate loan
clients’ ability to service their debts, or the impact of rate changes on demand
for loan, lease, and deposit products.
We
prepare a current base case and three alternative simulations, at least once a
quarter, and report the analysis to the Board of Directors. In
addition, more frequent forecasts may be produced when interest rates are
particularly uncertain or when other business conditions so
dictate.
Our
interest rate risk management goal is to avoid unacceptable variations in net
interest income and capital levels due to fluctuations in market
rates. Management attempts to achieve this goal by balancing,
within policy limits, the volume of floating-rate liabilities with a similar
volume of floating-rate assets, by keeping the average maturity of fixed-rate
asset and liability contracts reasonably matched, by maintaining a pool of
administered core deposits, and by adjusting pricing rates to market conditions
on a continuing basis.
The
balance sheet is subject to testing for interest rate shock possibilities to
indicate the inherent interest rate risk. Average interest rates are shocked by
plus or minus 100 and 200 basis points (“bp”) and plus 300bp, although we may
elect not to use particular scenarios that we determined are impractical in a
current rate environment. It is management’s goal to structure the
balance sheet so that net interest earnings at risk over a 12-month period and
the economic value of equity at risk do not exceed policy guidelines at the
various interest rate shock levels.
We
augment our quarterly interest rate shock analysis with alternative external
interest rate scenarios on a monthly basis. These alternative
interest rate scenarios may include non-parallel rate ramps.
Analysis
Measures
of net interest income at risk produced by simulation analysis are indicators of
an institution’s short-term performance in alternative rate
environments. These measures are typically based upon a relatively
brief period, usually one year. They do not necessarily indicate the
long-term prospects or economic value of the institution.
ESTIMATED
CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME
Changes
in Interest Rates
|
+300
bp
|
+200
bp
|
+100
bp
|
-100
bp
|
-200
bp
|
Policy
Limit
|
10.0%
|
7.5%
|
5.0%
|
-5.0%
|
-7.5%
|
June
30, 2008
|
1.2%
|
3.2%
|
2.7%
|
-1.8%
|
-7.1%
|
March
31, 2008
|
1.3%
|
3.9%
|
3.1%
|
-2.6%
|
-7.5%
|
The Net
Interest Income at Risk position improved since the first quarter of 2008 in all
rate scenarios. All of the above measures of net interest income at
risk remained well within prescribed policy limits. Although assumed
to be unlikely, our largest exposure is at the -200 bp level, with a measure of
-7.1%. This is within our prescribed policy limit of
-7.5%.
The
measures of equity value at risk indicate our ongoing economic value by
considering the effects of changes in interest rates on all of our cash flows,
and discounting the cash flows to estimate the present value of assets and
liabilities. The difference between these discounted values of the assets and
liabilities is the economic value of equity, which, in theory, approximates the
fair value of our net assets.
ESTIMATED
CHANGES IN ECONOMIC VALUE OF EQUITY
Changes
in Interest Rates
|
+300
bp
|
+200
bp
|
+100
bp
|
-100
bp
|
-200
bp
|
Policy
Limit
|
12.5%
|
10.0%
|
7.5%
|
-7.5%
|
-10.0%
|
June
30, 2008
|
1.5%
|
3.1%
|
2.3%
|
-3.3%
|
-7.1%
|
March
31, 2008
|
1.6%
|
3.3%
|
2.5%
|
-3.6%
|
-7.2%
|
Our risk
profile, as measured by EVE, improved over the first quarter of 2008 in all rate
scenarios. Although assumed to be unlikely, our largest exposure is
at the -200 bp level, with a measure of -7.1%. This is well within
our prescribed policy limit of 10.0%.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity
General. Liquidity
for a banking institution is the availability of funds to meet increased loan
demand, excessive deposit withdrawals, and the payment of other contractual cash
obligations. Management monitors our financial position in an effort
to ensure we have sufficient access to liquid funds to meet normal transaction
requirements and take advantage of investment opportunities and cover unforeseen
liquidity demands. In addition to core deposit growth, sources of
funds available to meet liquidity demands include cash received through ordinary
business activities (i.e., collection of interest and fees), federal funds sold,
loan and investment maturities, our bank lines of credit, approved lines for the
purchase of federal funds by CCB, and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”)
advances.
Average
liquidity, defined as funds sold and interest bearing deposits with other banks,
for the second quarter of 2008 was $207.0 million compared to $96.7 million in
the fourth quarter of 2007. The increase reflects the higher level of
public funds deposit balances realized for the first half of the year (see
discussion above – Deposits).
Borrowings. At
June 30, 2008, advances from the FHLB consisted of $45.1 million in outstanding
debt and 39 notes. For the first six months of the year, the Bank
made FHLB advance payments totaling approximately $5.2 million and obtained 11
new FHLB advances totaling $11.6 million to match-fund term loan fixed rate
financing for commercial loan clients. The FHLB notes are
collateralized by a blanket floating lien on all of our 1-4 family residential
mortgage loans, commercial real estate mortgage loans, and home equity mortgage
loans.
We have
the ability to draw on a $25.0 million Revolving Credit Note with SunTrust that
is due on March 2010. Interest is payable monthly at the floating 30
day LIBOR plus .75%. Principal is due at maturity. The
revolving credit is unsecured. The existing loan agreement contains
certain financial covenants that we must maintain. At June 30, 2008,
we were in compliance with all of the terms of the agreement and had $23.5
million available to borrow under the line of credit facility.
We have
issued two junior subordinated, deferrable interest notes to two wholly-owned
Delaware statutory trusts. The first note for $30.9 million was
issued to CCBG Capital Trust I in November 2004. The second note for
$32.0 million was issued to CCBG Capital Trust II in May 2005. The
interest payments for the CCBG Capital Trust I borrowing are due quarterly at a
fixed rate of 5.71% for five years, then adjustable annually to LIBOR plus a
margin of 1.90%. This note matures on December 31,
2034. The proceeds of this borrowing were used to partially fund the
acquisition of Farmers and Merchants Bank of Dublin. The interest
payments for the CCBG Capital Trust II borrowing are due quarterly at a fixed
rate of 6.07% for five years, then adjustable quarterly to LIBOR plus a margin
of 1.80%. This note matures on June 15, 2035. The proceeds
of this borrowing were used to partially fund the First Alachua Banking
Corporation acquisition.
Capital
Equity
capital was $296.6 million as of June 30, 2008, compared to $292.7 million as of
December 31, 2007. Management continues to monitor our capital
position in relation to our level of assets with the objective of maintaining a
strong capital position. The leverage ratio was 10.54% at June 30,
2008 compared to 10.41% at December 31, 2007. Further, the
risk-adjusted capital ratio of 14.35% at June 30, 2008 exceeds the 8.0% minimum
requirement and the 10% threshold to be designated as “well-capitalized” under
the risk-based regulatory guidelines. As allowed by the Federal
Reserve Board capital guidelines, the trust preferred securities issued by CCBG
Capital Trust I and CCBG Capital Trust II are included as Tier 1 capital in our
capital calculations.
Adequate
capital and financial strength is paramount to the stability of CCBG and the
Bank. Cash dividends declared and paid should not place unnecessary
strain on our capital levels. Although a consistent dividend payment
is believed to be favorably viewed by the financial markets and shareowners, the
Board of Directors will declare dividends only if we are considered to have
adequate capital. Future capital requirements and corporate plans are
considered when the Board considers a dividend payment. Dividends
declared and paid during the first six months of 2008 totaled $.370 per share
compared to $.350 per share for the first six months of 2007, an increase of
5.7%. The dividend payout ratios for the first six months of 2008 and
2007 were 52.6% and 42.9%, respectively.
State and
federal regulations place certain restrictions on the payment of dividends by
both CCBG and the Bank. At June 30, 2008, these regulations and
covenants did not impair CCBG or the Bank's ability to declare and pay dividends
or to meet other existing obligations in the normal course of
business.
During
the first six months of 2008, shareowners’ equity increased $3.9 million, or
2.7%, on an annualized basis. During this same period, shareowners’
equity was positively impacted by net income of $12.1 million and the issuance
of common stock of $.5 million. Equity was reduced by dividends paid
during the first six months by $6.2 million, or $.370 per share, the
repurchase/retirement of common stock of $2.4 million, and a decline in the
unrealized gain on investment securities of $.1 million. At June 30,
2008, our common stock had a book value of $17.33 per diluted share compared to
$17.03 at December 31, 2007.
Our Board
of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to 2,671,875 shares of our
outstanding common stock. The purchases are made in the open market
or in privately negotiated transactions. To date, we have repurchased
a total of 2,374,242 shares at an average purchase price of $26.08 per
share. We repurchased 90,041 shares of our common stock during the
first six months of 2008 at an average purchase price of $26.77 and repurchased
65,041 of the 90,041 shares of our common stock in the second quarter of 2008 at
an average purchase price of $25.88 per share.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We do not
currently engage in the use of derivative instruments to hedge interest rate
risks. However, we are a party to financial instruments with
off-balance sheet risks in the normal course of business to meet the financing
needs of our clients.
At June
30, 2008, we had $400.8 million in commitments to extend credit and $16.6
million in standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit
are agreements to lend to a client so long as there is no violation of any
condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have
fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a
fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without
being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent
future cash requirements. Standby letters of credit are conditional
commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a client to a third
party. We use the same credit policies in establishing commitments
and issuing letters of credit as we do for on-balance sheet
instruments.
If
commitments arising from these financial instruments continue to require funding
at historical levels, management does not anticipate that such funding will
adversely impact its ability to meet on-going obligations. In the
event these commitments require funding in excess of historical levels,
management believes current liquidity, available lines of credit from the FHLB,
and investment security maturities provide a sufficient source of funds to meet
these commitments.
ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
consolidated financial statements and accompanying Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, which require us to make
various estimates and assumptions (see Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements). We believe that, of our significant accounting
policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and
complexity.
Allowance for Loan
Losses. The allowance for loan losses is established through a
charge to the provision for loan losses. Provisions are made to
reserve for estimated losses in loan balances. The allowance for loan
losses is a significant estimate and is evaluated quarterly by us for
adequacy. The use of different estimates or assumptions could produce
a different required allowance, and thereby a larger or smaller provision
recognized as expense in any given reporting period. A further
discussion of the allowance for loan losses can be found in the section entitled
"Allowance for Loan Losses" and Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in our 2007 Form 10-K.
Intangible
Assets. Intangible assets consist primarily of goodwill, core
deposit assets, and other identifiable intangibles that were recognized in
connection with various acquisitions. Goodwill represents the excess
of the cost of acquired businesses over the fair market value of their
identifiable net assets. We perform an impairment review on an annual
basis to determine if there has been impairment of our goodwill. We
have determined that no impairment existed at December 31,
2007. Impairment testing requires management to make significant
judgments and estimates relating to the fair value of its identified reporting
units. Significant changes to these estimates may have a material
impact on our reported results.
Core
deposit assets represent the premium we paid for core deposits. Core
deposit intangibles are amortized on the straight-line method over various
periods ranging from 5-10 years. Generally, core deposits refer to
nonpublic, non-maturing deposits including noninterest-bearing deposits, NOW,
money market and savings. We make certain estimates relating to the
useful life of these assets, and rate of run-off based on the nature of the
specific assets and the client bases acquired. If there is a reason
to believe there has been a permanent loss in value, management will assess
these assets for impairment. Any changes in the original estimates
may materially affect reported earnings.
Pension Assumptions. We have a defined
benefit pension plan for the benefit of substantially all of our
associates. Our funding policy with respect to the pension plan is to
contribute amounts to the plan sufficient to meet minimum funding requirements
as set by law. Pension expense, reflected in the Consolidated
Statements of Income in noninterest expense as "Salaries and Associate
Benefits," is determined by an external actuarial valuation based on assumptions
that are evaluated annually as of December 31, the measurement date for the
pension obligation. The Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition reflect an accrued pension benefit cost due to funding levels and
unrecognized actuarial amounts. The most significant assumptions used
in calculating the pension obligation are the weighted-average discount rate
used to determine the present value of the pension obligation, the
weighted-average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, and the
assumed rate of annual compensation increases. These assumptions are
re-evaluated annually with the external actuaries, taking into consideration
both current market conditions and anticipated long-term market
conditions.
The
weighted-average discount rate is determined by matching the anticipated
Retirement Plan cash flows to a long-term corporate Aa-rated bond index and
solving for the underlying rate of return, which investing in such securities
would generate. This methodology is applied consistently from
year-to-year. We anticipate using a 6.25% discount rate in
2008.
The
weighted-average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is determined
based on the current and anticipated future mix of assets in the
plan. The assets currently consist of equity securities, U.S.
Government and Government Agency debt securities, and other securities
(typically temporary liquid funds awaiting investment). We anticipate
using a rate of return on plan assets of 8.0% for 2008.
The
assumed rate of annual compensation increases is based on expected trends in
salaries and the employee base. We used a rate of 5.50% in 2007 and
do not expect this assumption to change materially in 2008.
Information
on components of our net periodic benefit cost is provided in Note 8 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included herein and Note 12 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2007 Form 10-K.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards
SFAS No. 141,
“Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”).” SFAS 141R replaces SFAS
141, “Business Combinations,” and applies to all transactions and other events
in which one entity obtains control over one or more other
businesses. SFAS 141R requires an acquirer, upon initially
obtaining control of another entity, to recognize the assets, liabilities and
any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value as of the acquisition
date. Contingent consideration is required to be recognized and
measured at fair value on the date of acquisition rather than at a later date
when the amount of that consideration may be determinable beyond a reasonable
doubt. This fair value approach replaces the cost-allocation process
required under SFAS 141 whereby the cost of an acquisition was allocated to
the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated
fair value. SFAS 141R requires acquirers to expense
acquisition-related costs as incurred rather than allocating such costs to the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as was previously the case under
SFAS 141. Under SFAS 141R, the requirements of
SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities,” would have to be met in order to accrue for a restructuring plan in
purchase accounting. Pre-acquisition contingencies are to be recognized at fair
value, unless it is a non-contractual contingency that is not likely to
materialize, in which case, nothing should be recognized in purchase accounting
and, instead, that contingency would be subject to the probable and estimable
recognition criteria of SFAS 5, “Accounting for
Contingencies.” SFAS 141R is effective for business
combinations closing on or after January 1, 2009. We are in the
process of reviewing the impact of SFAS 141R.
SFAS No. 157,
"Fair Value Measurements." SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements
(see Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements).
SFAS
No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities-Including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115." SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure
eligible items at fair value at specified election dates (see Note 11 – Fair
Value Measurements).
SFAS No. 160,
“Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of
ARB Statement No. 51.” SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” to establish
accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160
clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes
referred to as minority interest, is an ownership interest in the consolidated
entity that should be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated
financial statements. Among other requirements, SFAS 160
requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the
amounts attributable to both the parent and the non-controlling
interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the
consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling
interest. SFAS 160 is effective on January 1, 2009 and is
not expected to have a significant impact on our financial
statements.
Emerging
Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issues
In
September 2006, the FASB ratified the consensus the EITF reached regarding EITF
Issue No. 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement
Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements” (“Issue
06-4”), which provides accounting guidance for postretirement benefits related
to endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements, whereby the employer
owns and controls the insurance policies. The consensus concludes
that an employer should recognize a liability for the postretirement benefit in
accordance with Statement 106. In addition, the consensus states that
an employer should also recognize an asset based on the substance of the
arrangement with the employee. Issue 06-4 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2007 with early application
permitted. We adopted EITF 06-4 on January 1, 2008 as a change in
accounting principle through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings
totaling $30,000.
SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletins
SAB No.
109, "Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through
Earnings." SAB No. 109 supersedes SAB No. 105, "Application of
Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments," and indicates that the expected net
future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be
included in the measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted
for at fair value through earnings. The guidance in SAB No. 109
became effective on January 1, 2008 and did not have a material impact on
our financial statements.
TABLE
I
AVERAGE
BALANCES & INTEREST RATES
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans,
Net of Unearned Interest(1)(2)
|
$
|
1,908,802
|
$
|
33,610
|
7.08
|
%
|
$
|
1,944,969
|
$
|
39,300
|
8.10
|
%
|
$
|
1,909,187
|
$
|
69,063
|
7.27
|
%
|
$
|
1,962,499
|
$
|
78,564
|
8.07
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable
Investment Securities
|
93,814
|
1,028
|
4.38
|
105,425
|
1,236
|
4.68
|
94,300
|
2,136
|
4.52
|
106,894
|
2,499
|
4.68
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax-Exempt
Investment Securities(2)
|
94,371
|
1,200
|
5.09
|
83,907
|
1,088
|
5.19
|
92,581
|
2,407
|
5.20
|
83,270
|
2,127
|
5.11
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Funds
Sold
|
206,984
|
1,028
|
1.96
|
52,935
|
689
|
5.15
|
206,649
|
2,602
|
2.49
|
46,669
|
1,210
|
5.16
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Earning Assets
|
2,303,971
|
36,866
|
6.43
|
2,187,236
|
42,313
|
7.76
|
2,302,717
|
76,208
|
6.65
|
2,199,332
|
84,400
|
7.73
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
& Due From Banks
|
82,182
|
88,075
|
88,214
|
88,376
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for Loan Losses
|
(20,558
|
)
|
(17,263
|
)
|
(19,392
|
)
|
(17,169
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
Assets
|
269,176
|
253,204
|
269,083
|
250,428
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
2,634,771
|
$
|
2,511,252
|
$
|
2,640,622
|
$
|
2,520,967
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOW
Accounts
|
$
|
788,237
|
$
|
1,935
|
0.99
|
%
|
$
|
541,525
|
$
|
2,611
|
1.93
|
%
|
$
|
781,064
|
$
|
5,375
|
1.38
|
%
|
$
|
546,884
|
$
|
5,237
|
1.93
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money
Market Accounts
|
376,996
|
1,210
|
1.29
|
393,403
|
3,458
|
3.53
|
383,412
|
3,408
|
1.79
|
390,088
|
6,885
|
3.56
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings
Accounts
|
117,182
|
29
|
0.10
|
122,560
|
74
|
0.24
|
115,172
|
63
|
0.11
|
123,982
|
152
|
0.25
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
Time Deposits
|
443,006
|
3,988
|
3.62
|
474,761
|
4,955
|
4.19
|
455,143
|
8,797
|
3.89
|
477,845
|
9,824
|
4.15
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Int. Bearing Deposits
|
1,725,421
|
7,162
|
1.67
|
1,532,249
|
11,098
|
2.91
|
1,734,791
|
17,643
|
2.05
|
1,538,799
|
22,098
|
2.90
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-Term
Borrowings
|
55,830
|
296
|
2.13
|
66,764
|
737
|
4.41
|
61,963
|
817
|
2.64
|
67,832
|
1,498
|
4.44
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated
Notes Payable
|
62,887
|
931
|
5.86
|
62,887
|
932
|
5.94
|
62,887
|
1,862
|
5.86
|
62,887
|
1,858
|
5.96
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
Long-Term Borrowings
|
34,612
|
396
|
4.60
|
42,284
|
496
|
4.71
|
31,128
|
727
|
4.70
|
42,708
|
998
|
4.71
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Int. Bearing Liabilities
|
1,878,750
|
8,785
|
1.88
|
1,704,184
|
13,263
|
3.12
|
1,890,769
|
21,049
|
2.24
|
1,712,226
|
26,452
|
3.11
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest
Bearing Deposits
|
415,125
|
455,169
|
409,918
|
456,728
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
Liabilities
|
40,006
|
42,547
|
41,088
|
39,115
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
2,333,881
|
2,201,900
|
2,341,775
|
2,208,069
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SHAREOWNERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL
SHAREOWNERS' EQUITY
|
300,890
|
309,352
|
298,847
|
312,898
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES & EQUITY
|
$
|
2,634,771
|
$
|
2,511,252
|
$
|
2,640,622
|
$
|
2,520,967
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
Rate Spread
|
4.55
|
4.64
|
4.41
|
4.62
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Interest Income
|
$
|
28,081
|
$
|
29,050
|
$
|
55,159
|
$
|
57,948
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Interest Margin(3)
|
4.90
|
%
|
5.33
|
%
|
4.81
|
%
|
5.31
|
%
|
(1)
|
Average balances include
nonaccrual loans. Interest income includes fees on loans of
$682,000 and $1.4 million, for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, versus $743,000 and $1.6 million for the comparable periods ended
June 30, 2007.
|
(2)
|
Interest income includes the
effects of taxable equivalent adjustments using a 35% tax
rate.
|
(3)
|
Taxable equivalent net
interest income divided by average earning
assets.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
See
“Financial Condition - Market Risk and Interest Rate Sensitivity” in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, above, which is incorporated herein by
reference. Management has determined that no additional disclosures
are necessary to assess changes in information about market risk that have
occurred since December 31, 2007.
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of
June 30, 2008, the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer each
concluded that as of June 30, 2008, the end of the period covered by this Form
10-Q, we maintained effective disclosure controls and procedures.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
has reviewed our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). There have been
no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting during
our most recently completed fiscal quarter that could significantly affect our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are
party to lawsuits and claims arising out of the normal course of
business. In management's opinion, there are no known pending claims
or litigation, the outcome of which would, individually or in the aggregate,
have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial
position, or cash flows.
Risk
Factors
|
In
addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, "Item 1A.
Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future
results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only
risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known
to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition and/or operating
results.
Item
2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
Purchases
of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The
following table contains information about all purchases made by or on behalf of
us or any affiliated purchaser (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the
Exchange Act) of shares or other units of any class of our equity securities
that is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
Period
|
Total
number
of
shares
purchased
|
Average
price
paid
per
share
|
Total
number of
shares
purchased as
part
of our share
repurchase program(1)
|
Maximum
Number
of
shares that
may
yet be purchased
under
our share
repurchase
program
|
|||||||||||||
April
1, 2008 to
April
30, 2008
|
6,500
|
$25.90
|
2,315,701
|
356,174
|
|||||||||||||
May
1, 2008 to
May
31, 2008
|
38,050
|
$25.74
|
2,353,751
|
318,124
|
|||||||||||||
June
1, 2008 to
June
30, 2008
|
20,491
|
$25.99
|
2,374,242
|
297,633
|
|||||||||||||
Total
|
65,041
|
$25.88
|
2,374,242
|
297,633
|
|||||||||||||
(1)
|
This
balance represents the number of shares that were repurchased through the
Capital City Bank Group, Inc. Share Repurchase Program (the “Program”),
which was approved on March 30, 2000, and modified by our Board on January
24, 2002, March 22, 2007, and November 11, 2007 under which we were
authorized to repurchase up to 2,671,875 shares of our common
stock. The Program is flexible and shares are acquired from the
public markets and other sources using free cash flow. There is
no predetermined expiration date for the Program. No shares in
the second quarter were repurchased outside of the
Program.
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
|
None.
Item
4.
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
|
The
Annual Meeting of Shareowners of Capital City Bank Group, Inc. was held on April
24, 2008. Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to
Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and there was no
solicitation in opposition to management’s solicitations. The
following summarizes all matters voted upon at this meeting.
1.
|
The
following directors were elected for terms expiring as
noted. These individuals served on the Board of Directors prior
to the Annual Meeting. The number of votes cast were as
follows:
|
For
terms to expire at the 2011 annual meeting:
|
For
|
Against/Withheld
|
||||||
Thomas
A. Barron
|
14,348,133 | 50,871 | ||||||
J.
Everitt Drew
|
14,345,156 | 53,848 | ||||||
Lina
Knox
|
14,318,221 | 80,783 |
2.
|
The
shareowners ratified the selection of Ernst & Young as the Company's
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2008. The number of votes cast were as
follows:
|
Against/
|
Broker
|
||
For
|
Withheld
|
Abstention
|
Non
Vote
|
14,349,754
|
24,063
|
25,186
|
0
|
Item
5.
|
Other Information
|
None.
Item
6.
|
(A)
|
Exhibits
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer hereunto duly authorized.
CAPITAL
CITY BANK GROUP, INC.
(Registrant)
By: /s/ J. Kimbrough Davis
|
|
J.
Kimbrough Davis
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(Mr.
Davis is the Principal Financial Officer and has been duly
|
|
authorized to sign on behalf of the Registrant) | |
Date: August
8, 2008
|
-37-