CareView Communications Inc - Annual Report: 2014 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

 For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2014

 For the transition period from________ to ___________

Commission File No.: 000-54090

CAREVIEW COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

405 State Highway 121, Suite B-240, Lewisville, TX 75067

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (972) 943-6050

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     Yes  ☐     No  ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.     Yes  ☐     No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  ☒     No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes  ☒     No  ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes  ☐     No  ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (90,950,412 shares) based on the closing price of the registrant’s common stock as reported on OTCQB on June 30, 2014, which was the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $58,208,264. For purposes of this computation, all officers, directors, and 10% beneficial owners of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of March 31, 2015 was 139,380,748.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

None.

Table of Contents

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. For example, statements regarding our financial position, business strategy, product development, and other plans and objectives for future operations, and assumptions and predictions about future product demand, research and development, marketing, expenses and sales are all forward-looking statements. These statements may be found in the items of this Annual Report entitled “Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” as well as in this Annual Report generally. These statements are generally accompanied by words such as “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “potential(ly),” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “continue,” “forecast,” “predict,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology.

INTRODUCTORY COMMENT

Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”), the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “CareView,” or “our Company” refers to CareView Communications, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and unless otherwise specified, includes our wholly owned subsidiaries, CareView Communications, Inc., a Texas corporation (“CareView-TX”) and CareView Operations, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“CareView Operations”) (collectively known as the “Company’s Subsidiaries”) and its LLCs, CareView-Hillcrest and CareView-Saline, determined to be variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which the Company exercises control and is deemed the Primary Beneficiary (collectively known as the “Company’s LLCs”).

PART I

Our Business

Our mission is to be the leading provider of products and on-demand application services for the healthcare industry, specializing in bedside video monitoring, software tools to improve hospital communications and operations, and patient education and entertainment packages. Our proprietary, high-speed data network system is the next generation of patient care monitoring that allows real-time bedside and point-of-care video monitoring designed to improve patient safety and overall hospital costs. The entertainment packages and patient education enhance the patient’s quality of stay. Reported results from CareView-driven hospitals prove that our products reduce falls, reduce the cost of sitter fees, increase patient satisfaction and reduce bed turnaround time to increase patient flow. For patients, we have a convenient in-room, entertainment package that includes high-speed Internet, access to first-run on-demand movies and visual connectivity to family and friends from anywhere in the world. For the hospital, we offer tools to provide superior patient care, peace of mind and customer service satisfaction.

Our CareView System^® suite of video monitoring, guest services and related applications connect patients, families and healthcare providers. Through the use of telecommunications technology and the Internet, our evolving products and on-demand services greatly increase the access to quality medical care and education for patients/consumers and healthcare professionals. We understand the importance of providing high quality patient care in a safe environment and believe in partnering with hospitals to improve the quality of patient care and safety by providing a system that monitors and records continuously. We are committed to providing an affordable video monitoring tool to improve the practice of nursing, create a better work environment and make the patient’s hospital stay more informative and satisfying. Our suite of products and services can simplify and streamline the task of preventing and managing patients’ falls, enhance patient safety, improve quality of care and reduce costs associated with bringing information technology directly to patients, families and healthcare providers. Our products and services can be used in all types of hospitals, nursing homes, adult living centers and selected outpatient care facilities domestically and internationally.

The CareView System secure video monitoring system connects the patient room to a touch-screen monitor at the nursing station, allowing nursing staff to maintain a level of visual contact with each patient. This configuration enhances the use of the nurse call system, reduces unnecessary steps to and from patient rooms, and the recording capability allows for a video record of all in-room activity during the length of the patient’s hospital stay. The CareView System suite can be easily configured to meet the individual privacy and security requirements of any hospital or nursing facility. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) compliant, patient approved video record can be included as part of the patient’s medical record and serves as additional documentation of bedside care, procedures performed, patient and hospital ancillary activities, safety or care incidents, support to necessitate additional clinical services, and, if necessary, as evidence. Additional HIPAA-compliance features allow privacy options to be enabled at any time by the patient, nurse or physician.

In addition to patient safety and security, we also provides a suite of services to increase patient satisfaction scores and enhance the overall image of the hospital including first-run on-demand movies, Internet access via the patient’s television, and video visits with family and friends from most places throughout the world. Through continued investment in patient care technology, our products and services help hospitals and assisted living facilities build a safe, high quality healthcare delivery system that best serves the patient, while striving for the highest level of satisfaction and comfort.

Our Products and Services

We offers a variety of products and services designed to meet individual hospital needs to enhance quality patient care and safety. Our services are offered with no capital expenditure by the hospital and do not require extensive integration with the facility’s management information system. For healthcare facilities looking for an effective, affordable and innovative way to improve performance throughout the facility, our products are the answer. CareView-driven facilities have shown documented success in reducing patient falls and sitter costs, improving overall patient satisfaction, streamlining and documenting patient education at the bedside, and improving patient flow and overcrowding. These successes protect the facilities’ reimbursement from loss due to never events and poor patient satisfaction.

The CareView System offers the following service packages:

PRIMARY PACKAGE

ADDITIONAL CAREVIEW PRODUCTS

GUEST SERVICES PACKAGE

Pricing Structure and Revenue Streams

The CareView System suite is provided and installed in healthcare facilities at no charge to the facility after which we generate revenue from subscriptions to its services. We work with each hospital on pricing to offer an affordable package based on the demographics of the hospital’s patients. The pricing structure with each hospital is negotiated separately and may vary depending on the hospital’s desire to include premium services at no charge to the patient. Typically, we offer the Primary Package at a price per bed with varying price structures based on number of beds in each facility. The Guest Services Package is generally offered to the patient as a complimentary service of the hospital; however, hospitals have the option to charge their patients for these services. The hospital may elect to charge a package price for all services for any combination of days, including a package for the patient’s entire stay. Each facility may decide to bundle products for specialty pricing to the patients or may offer any or all services at no charge to the patient All revenue generated by us during the last two fiscal years was derived from the sale of the Primary Package, Additional CareView Products, Guest Services Package and related services to hospitals.

Products in Development

Products and Services Agreement with Healthcare Facilities

We offer our products and services through a subscription-based and/or shared revenue-pricing agreement with the healthcare facility through a Products and Services Agreement (the “P&S Agreement”). During the term of the P&S Agreement, we provide continuous monitoring of the CareView System’s products and services deployed to the healthcare facility and maintain and service all equipment installed by us. Terms of each P&S Agreement require the hospital to pay us a monthly subscription fee based on the number of selected, installed and activated services. Terms also provide for us to collect the revenue from all GuestView services which may be split on a contracted basis between us and each hospital. Unless a separate agreement to the contrary is negotiated with the hospital, all shared revenue is collected from the patient, or someone connected to the patient, by us online through a credit card or PayPal transaction. We then remit the portion due to the hospital on a monthly basis. None of the services provided through the Primary Package or GuestView are paid or reimbursed by any third party provider including insurance companies, Medicare or Medicaid.

P&S Agreements are currently negotiated for a period of five years with a minimum of two or three years; however, older P&S Agreements were negotiated for a five year period with a provision for automatic renewal. P&S Agreements specific to pilot programs generally contain a six-month term. We own all rights, title, and interest in and to the equipment we install at each location and agree to maintain and repair it, although we may charge for repairs or replacements due to damage or misuse. We are not responsible for maintaining data arising from use of the CareView System or for transmission errors, corruption or compromise of data carried over local or interchange telecommunication carriers. We grant each medical facility a limited, revocable, non-transferable and non-exclusive license to use the software, network facilities, content and documentation on and in the CareView System suite to the extent, and only to the extent, necessary to access, explore and otherwise use the CareView System suite in real time. Such non-exclusive license expires upon termination of the P&S Agreement.

We use specific terminology in an effort to better define and track the staging and billing of the individual components of the CareView System suite. The CareView System suite includes three components which are separately billed; the Room Control Platform (the “RCP”), the Nurse Station and mobile devices (each component referred to as a “unit”). The term “bed” refers to each hospital bed as part of the overall potential volume that a hospital represents. For example, if a hospital has 200 beds, the aggregate of those beds is the overall potential volume of that hospital. The term “bed” is often used interchangeably with “RCP” or “Room Control Platform” as this component of the system consistently resides within each hospital room where the “bed” is located. On average, there are six Nurse Stations for each 100 beds. The term “deployed” means that the units have been delivered to the hospital, but have not yet been installed at their respective locations within the hospital. The term “installed” means that the units have been mounted and are operational. The term “billable” refers to the aggregate of all units on which we charge fees. Units become billable once they are installed and the required personnel have been trained in their use. Units are only deployed upon the execution of a P&S Agreement or three- and six month pilot agreements.

Community Health Systems, Inc.

In January 2014, Community Health Systems, Inc. (“CHS”) acquired Hospital Management Associates, Inc. (“HMA”). Under the terms of an existing products and services agreement with HMA, we currently have approximately 3,600 units deployed. Under a separate agreement with HMA, due to their budgetary concerns, only 1,050 units are billable. The 2,550 unbillable units remain installed pending future disposition.

Post-acquisition, CHS assumed our product and services agreement with HMA. Although that agreement expired on December 31, 2014, we are continuing to bill on a month to month basis. We expect to close on a new contract with CHS within the next 30 days whereby CHS would agree to transfer approximately 600 inactive units to billable, bringing the total billable units to approximately 1,650, with the balance of approximately 950 units redeployed within other CHS hospitals or to other health systems. Assuming execution of the new contract, we will also be authorized to enter into products and service agreements with other interested CHS facilities which includes the potential for an approximate 31,000 additional beds.

Tenet Healthsystem Medical, Inc.

In February 2014, we entered into a Master Product and Services Agreement (the “Master Agreement”) with Tenet Healthsystem Medical, Inc. (“Tenet”). The terms of the Master Agreement provide for the execution of a facilities level agreement with each hospital. We deployed 773 units to complete the deployment of Tenet’s Central Region. We are currently installing their Southern Region with 153 of the 897 scheduled units installed. Thereafter, we anticipate a continued roll-out to the remaining Tenet regions, which includes the potential for an approximate 12,000 additional beds out of their estimated 20,000 licensed beds.

Kaiser Permanente

In April 2014 and May 2014, we expanded our presence with Kaiser Permanente (“Kaiser”) through the execution of paid pilot agreements with Kaiser’s Baldwin Park and Panorama City facilities. This is in addition to our paid pilot agreement with Kaiser Permanente Orange County covering its facilities in Anaheim and Irvine, California which was executed in October 2013. These four facilities are under six-month pilot agreements which provided for a monthly renewal until termination or replacement by a Master Agreement. In October 2014, the facilities in Anaheim and Irvine requested an additional 144 beds as they commenced to build out the rest of their hospitals in anticipation of the execution of a Master Agreement. We are currently in the process of negotiating a Master Agreement which will replace the existing pilot agreements and allow for a seamless transition for the Kaiser facilities. We anticipate that the Master Agreement will be completed by mid-2015. Execution of the Master Agreement with Kaiser includes the potential for an approximate 7,000 additional beds out of their estimated 8,600 licensed beds.

Parkland

On October 31, 2014, we signed a paid pilot agreement with Dallas County Hospital District d/b/a Parkland Health & Hospital System (“Parkland”) to install 100 beds with the CareView System. Upon successful completion of the pilot period, we anticipate deploying our products and services hospital-wide to an estimated 600 beds out of their estimated 969 licensed beds. Parkland is in the process of opening a new facility which will increase the total available beds; however, that estimated number is unknown at this time.

Hospital Corporation of America

In February 2015, we executed a six-month paid pilot agreement for 280 beds with Hospital Corporation of America (“HCA”) to install the CareView System in their Research Medical Center facility located in Kansas City, Missouri. HCA intends to use all CareView products including NurseView, Virtual Bedrails, BedView, Patient Services, CareView Connect mobile product and have expressed interest in our Asset Management and Tracking product. Additionally, we are pursuing an agreement with HCA’s Riverside Community Hospital and our negotiation are in the final stages.

Summary of Product and Service Usage

The following table shows the number of healthcare facilities using our products and services including the number of deployed units, installed units and billable units as of February 28, 2015. The table also shows the number of pilot programs in place and hospital proposals pending approval, estimated bed count if the pilot programs and pending proposals result in executed Products and Services Agreement, and the estimated total number of licensed beds available under the pilot programs and hospital proposals. There are no assurances that the pilot programs will be extended or the pending proposals will be approved to ultimately result in the number of estimated beds. Further, there are no assurances that we will have access to the total number of licensed beds in each healthcare facility.

Availability of Suppliers

We are not dependent on, nor do we expect to become dependent on, any one or a limited number of suppliers. We purchase parts and components to assemble our equipment and products. We do not manufacture or fabricate our own products or systems, but rely on sub-suppliers and third party vendors to procure and/or fabricate components based on our designs, engineering and specifications. We enter into subcontracts for field installation of our products which we supervise. We manage all technical, physical and commercial aspects of the performance of our contracts with sub-suppliers and third party vendors. To date, we have experienced no difficulties in obtaining fabricated components, materials and parts or in identifying qualified subcontractors for installation work.

Sales, Marketing and Customer Service

We do not consider our business to be seasonal. We generate sales leads through a variety of means including direct one-to-one marketing, email and web campaigns, customer and industry referrals, strategic partnerships, and trade shows and events. Our sales team consists of highly trained professionals with many years of experience in the healthcare market.

Our initial focus has been to pursue large for-profit hospital management companies that own multiple facilities and large not-for-profit integrated delivery networks in major metropolitan areas. Our sales staff approaches decision makers for hospitals, integrated delivery networks, and major owners and operators of hospitals to demonstrate the CareView product line. In 2013, we expanded our sales process to include an inside sales team and have expanded our capabilities of providing web-based demonstrations and presentations. In addition, we have begun to rely more heavily on arranging reference calls and site visits between our current customers and our prospects. These efforts have provided a higher volume of qualified sales leads and have resulted in more substantive conversations with a larger number of prospects.

We entered into an exclusive National Business Development Services Agreement (“NBDS Agreement”) with Relamatrix Group, Inc. (“RMG”) through which RMG facilitated business opportunities for CareView. The NBDS Agreement terminated on January 31, 2014. We may still be liable to pay fees to RMG if we actually contract with hospitals initiated through them. Through the date of this filing, we have not entered into any contracts related with hospitals introduced by RMG.

We ensure high levels of customer service through our account representatives and through our technical support processes. We attempt to position our account representatives geographically close to our customer hospitals to allow them to make regular visits to proactively train staff and address any issues. We offer 24/7 monitoring and phone support through our technical support team which allows us to quickly identify and resolve any technical issues. From time to time we are called upon to service the installed hardware at customer facilities. To facilitate expedient service, our account representatives typically maintain a small supply of RCPs should they need repair or replacement. Historically, our RCPs and Nursing Station units have required little, if any, servicing. We believe that we handle requests quickly and efficiently, and that overall, our customers are satisfied with our level of service.

Intellectual Property

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain patents, maintain trade secret protection and operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others. Our intellectual property portfolio is one of the means by which we attempt to protect our competitive position. We rely primarily on a combination of know-how, trade secrets, patents, trademarks and contractual restrictions to protect our products and to maintain our competitive position. We are constantly seeking ways to protect our intellectual property through registrations in relevant jurisdictions.

We have received patents from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and have numerous patents pending. We intend to file additional patent applications when appropriate; however, we may not file any such applications or, if filed, the patents may not be issued. We also have numerous registered trademarks.

We intend to aggressively prosecute, enforce and defend our patents, trademarks and proprietary technology. The loss, by expiration or otherwise, of any one patents may have a material effect on our business. Defense and enforcement of our intellectual property rights can be expensive and time consuming, even if the outcome is favorable to us. It is possible that the patents issued to or licensed to us will be successfully challenged, that a court may find that we are infringing validly issued patents of third parties, or that we may have to alter or discontinue the development of our products or pay licensing fees to take into account patent rights of third parties.

Joint Venture with Rockwell Holdings

On November 16, 2009, we entered into a joint venture relationship with Rockwell Holdings I, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company (“Rockwell”), wherein two Wisconsin limited liability companies were formed, CareView-Hillcrest, LLC (“CareView-Hillcrest”) and CareView-Saline, LLC (“CareView-Saline”) (together known as the “Project LLCs”). Under the terms of a Master Investment Agreement, CareView and Rockwell each own 50% of the Project LLCs with Rockwell providing the financing and CareView providing the technology and expertise to fully implement the CareView System in Hillcrest Medical Center in Tulsa, Oklahoma and Saline Memorial Hospital in Benton, Arkansas. Pursuant to the terms of the Operating Agreements of each of the Project LLCs, we are the managing member. We consolidate the Project LLCs as we have the power to direct the activities and an obligation to absorb losses.

On March 18, 2014, the Project Notes and Rockwell’s Preferential Returns, previously due on June 30, 2014 (the “June 2014 Extensions”), were extended to June 30, 2015. As of December 31, 2014, the Project LLCs’ indebtedness to Rockwell totaled approximately $1,075,000, including principal and interest.

In February 2015, the June 2014 Extensions were further extended to June 30, 2016. In conjunction with an August 2013 extension of the due dates of the Project Notes and Rockwell’s Preferential Returns to December 31, 2013, the expiration date of the Project Warrant was also extended from November 16, 2014 to November 16, 2015. All other provisions of the Warrants remained unchanged. The Warrants were amended and revalued in August 2013 resulting in a $25,327 increase in fair value, which was recorded as non-cash costs included in general and administration expense in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. CareView, as 50% owner of the LLCs, is currently negotiating with Rockwell to settle the debt of the LLCs through the issuance of shares of CareView’s Common Stock. Although CareView anticipates that this settlement will be forthcoming in the near future, CareView and the LLCs can give no assurances that a settlement will be negotiated, or if negotiated and settled, that it will be through the issuance of CareView’s Common Stock.

Installation and Technical Support

We provide installation and technical support for our customers through third-party providers located across the United States that we contract on a per-job basis.

Competition

We offer products in four distinct categories: clinical video monitoring and fall prevention, patient education and entertainment, patient flow, and mobile communications. We have competitors in each of these product areas; however, we believe that we offer the only integrated suite of products that combines all of these areas into one cost-effective platform. Some of our competitors may be larger, may have greater financial resources, and may have a longer history than us. We compete with them based on price, engineering and technological expertise, knowledge, and the quality of our products, systems and services. Additionally, we believe that the successful performance of our installed products and systems is a key factor in retaining current business and gaining new business as customers typically prefer to make significant purchases from a company with a solid performance history.

Clinical Video Monitoring and Fall Prevention: Cisco Systems, Inc., Avasure (a division of AvaSure Holdings, Inc.), and Royal Philips Electronics all provide clinical video monitoring tools. Cisco offers Virtual Patient Observation, a video monitoring tool aimed at reducing sitter costs and preventing patient falls. AvaSure offers a similar application using cameras mounted on a rolling camera stand, aimed at preventing patient falls. Philips offers the eICU product, which primarily targets a high-definition monitoring of patients in intensive-care applications and also provides telephonic consults.

Alternative fall prevention mechanisms include physical sensors manufactured by Stanley and Posey, and beds which include fall alarms manufactured by Stryker and Hill-Rom. Customers may consider these physical fall prevention mechanisms to be alternatives to a video-based fall prevention system such as the one we offer.

Patient Education and Entertainment: There are many vendors who offer patient entertainment products, and most of them also provide a portal for accessing patient educational content either authored by themselves or by third parties. Our major competitors include The GetWellNetwork (privately held by Welsh, Carson, Anderson and Stowe), Skylight Healthcare Systems, and Sonifi Solutions, Inc., all of which offer interactive patient communications systems.

Patient Flow: These systems may be called patient flow, census, bed tracking, patient tracking, or “bed board” applications. Our major competitors include companies that offer focused solutions such as TeleTracking Technologies, Inc., Aionex, Inc., and BedWatch, Inc. Additionally some Electronic Medical Record vendors offer similar products which may compete with our patient flow product.

Mobile Communications: Some competitors offer mobile communications on smart phones or voice-activated pendants which operate over the hospitals Wi-Fi system, including Vocera, Inc., and Voalte, Inc. Other competitors offer special-purpose phones that operate on the cellular network or other wireless technology, and provide notifications to caregivers within the hospital.

The clinical systems offered by our competitors do not appear to offer a video monitoring and observation option as provided by our system. It appears that we are the only company that offers solutions in more than one of the categories listed above.

In addition to favorable economics and enhanced patient care, safety and satisfaction, we also compete on the basis of quality of services provided. Our management believes that our GuestView patient services suite will provide revenue protection for our contracted hospitals under the Value Based Purchasing initiative which is part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, prompting hospitals to focus on Patient Satisfaction and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems to (i) prompt each healthcare facility to promote patients’ use of NetView, MovieView, and PatientView, and (ii) encourage the hospital to expand its use of pre-procedure and condition videos, welcome videos, and other ancillary services.

We believe we also compete based on the success of our products and services which provide our customers with:

We are currently unable to predict what competitive impact any regulatory development and advances in technology will have on our future business and results of operations. We believe our success depends upon our ability to maintain and enhance the performance, content and reliability of our products in response to the evolving demands of the industry and any competitive products that may emerge. We cannot give assurances that we will be able to do so successfully or that any enhancements or new products that we introduce will gain acceptance in the marketplace. If we are not successful or if our products are not accepted, we could lose potential customers to our competitors.

Domain Names

The Company’s maintains a website at www.care-view.com.

Major Customers

We derive all of our revenues from hospitals. For the year ended December 31, 2014, 91 hospitals accounted for all of our revenue. During 2014, IASIS Healthcare Corporation (“IASIS”), Community Health Systems, Inc. (“CHS”) (CHS acquired Health Management Associates, Inc. (“HMA”) in January, 2014) and Tenet Healthsystems Medical, Inc., accounted for 49%, 21% and 12% of our net revenues, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2013, 68 hospitals accounted for the all of our net revenue. During that period, IASIS and HMA accounted for 53% and 30% of our net revenues, respectively.

Backlog

Our estimated backlog is driven by signed P&S Agreements. Each P&S Agreement establishes the rates that we will charge for the use of our products and services as well as an approximate number of billable units that will be installed. Our RCPs, Nursing Stations and mobile devices are billed on a per unit basis. Most P&S Agreements are for five years but include options to cancel after a minimum of two or three years. Backlog, which covers the non-cancellable period, as of December 31, 2014 is approximately $9,200,000, of which approximately $4,400,000 is expected to be billed during 2015, as compared to approximately $2,500,000 as of December 31, 2013. Most of the current backlog will have future value as the P&S Agreements continue beyond the minimum two or three years and the P&S Agreements move toward expiration and potential renewal. The amount of the non-cancellable backlog to be billed beyond December 31, 2015 is approximately $4,800,000.

Research and Development Activities

The cost of our research and development activities for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 totaled approximately $843,000 and $860,000, respectively. None of the cost of such activities was borne directly by our customers. To date, we have not performed any customer-sponsored research and development activities relating to any new products or services.

Governmental Approval

Neither our Company nor our products are subject to government approval beyond required Federal Communication Commission (“FCC”) certifications. Certain medical devices and applications may be subject to Section 510(k) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act, which regulates the ability of medical device manufacturers to market their devices. CareView has reviewed the requirements for registration, and at the current time, we do not believe that our suite of applications is subject to 510(k) regulation. Although the parameters of our CareView System products and services complies with HIPAA as far as use by health care providers, CareView itself, as the manufacturer and installer of the units, is not subject to HIPAA regulations. We do not know of any other privacy laws that affect our business as we are not in control of nor do we keep patient medical records in our possession. We are unaware of any probable government regulations that may affect our business in the future. We have received Underwriters Laboratories (“UL”) and FCC approval on our products. Additionally, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services does not pay or reimburse any party for use of our products and services.

Environmental Laws

Our Company and our products are not affected by any federal, state, or local environmental laws; therefore, we have reserved no funds for compliance purposes.

Employees

As of March 15, 2015, we employed 56 persons on a full-time basis, two of whom are executive officers. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements and we have never experienced a major work stoppage, strike or dispute. We consider our relationship with our employees to be outstanding.

Financial Information about Segments and Geographic Areas

Our business consists of a single segment of products and services all of which are sold and provided within the United States.

Reports to Security Holders

We are subject to the requirements of Section 13(a) under the Exchange Act which requires us to file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, and we are required to comply with all other obligations of the Exchange Act applicable to issuers filing registration statements pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. You may read and copy any materials we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information filed electronically with the SEC at http://www/sec.gov.

You may obtain a copy, free of charge, of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the SEC. You may obtain these reports by making a request in writing addressed to: Steven G. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, CareView Communications, Inc., 405 State Highway 121, Suite B-240, Lewisville, TX 75067 or by downloading these reports and further information about our company on our website at http://www.care-view.com.

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all of our officers and directors and a Code of Ethics for Financial Executives. These codes are available for download on our website or may be obtained free of charge by making a request in writing to Steven G. Johnson, as indicated hereinabove.

We are a smaller reporting company, and as such, are not required to provide information pursuant to this item.

N/A.

We lease approximately 16,610 square feet of office and warehouse space at 405 State Highway 121, Suite B-240, Lewisville, TX 75067 under a lease that was set to expire on June 30, 2015. On December 8, 2014, we entered into a Lease Extension Agreement (the “Lease Extension”), wherein we extended the Lease through June 30, 2020. The Lease Extension contains a renewal provision under which we may renew the Lease for an additional five-year period under the same terms and conditions. The current base lease rate through June 30, 2015 is $14,219 monthly. The average base lease rate for the Lease Extension is $15,065. We believe that these premises are adequate and sufficient for our current needs.

None.

N/A.

PART II

Market Information

Our Common Stock is traded on the OTCQB as provided by OTC Market Group, Inc. (“OTCQB”) under the symbol “CRVW.” The following table shows the high and low sales prices of our Common Stock for each full quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years. The below market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Holders

Records of our stock transfer agent indicate that as of March 13, 2015, we had approximately 110 record holders of our Common Stock. The number of registered shareholders excludes any estimate by us of the number of beneficial owners of shares of our Common Stock held in “street name.” We estimate that there are approximately 1,100 beneficial shareholders who hold their shares in street name. As of the date of this Report, we had 139,380,748 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

Dividends

Historically, we have not paid dividends on our Common Stock and we currently do not intend to pay any dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable future. We currently plan to retain any earnings to finance the growth of our business rather than to pay cash dividends.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

As of December 31, 2014, the following table shows the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock options under equity compensation plans approved by our shareholders, which plans do not provide for the issuance of warrants or other rights. The following table does not include the 5,000,000 shares authorized for issuance under the CareView Communications, Inc. 2015 Stock Option Plan (the “2015 Plan”) approved by our Board of Directors on February 25, 2015.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On February 25, 2015, we issued ten-year Non-Qualified Stock options to purchase shares of our Common Stock having an exercise price of $0.53 with the underlying shares vesting annually over of a three-year period (the “Option(s)”) as follows: (i) Sandra McRee, Chief Operating Officer, Option for 1,000,000 shares; (ii) certain employees of the Company, Options for an aggregate of 565,000 shares; (iii) L. Allen Wheeler, Principal Accounting Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Option for 150,000 shares; and (iv) Steven B. Epstein, Director, Option for 50,000 shares.

Cancellation and Expiration of Options

During the year ended December 31, 2014, options to purchase an aggregate of 116,667 shares of our Common Stock were cancelled due to resignation and termination of five employees. In addition, during the same time period, options to purchase an aggregate of 44,999 shares of our Common Stock expired.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 229.10(f)(1) and are not required to provide information under this item.

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the information set forth under our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements.

Company Overview

Our mission is to be the leading provider of products and on-demand application services for the healthcare industry, specializing in bedside video monitoring, software tools to improve hospital communications and operations, and patient education and entertainment packages. Our CareView System suite of video monitoring, guest services and related applications connect patients, families and healthcare providers. Through the use of telecommunications technology and the Internet, our evolving products and on-demand services greatly increase the access to quality medical care and education for patients/consumers and healthcare professionals. We understand the importance of providing high quality patient care in a safe environment and believe in partnering with hospitals to improve the quality of patient care and safety by providing a system that monitors and records continuously. We are committed to providing an affordable video monitoring tool to improve the practice of nursing, create a better work environment and make the patient’s hospital stay more informative and satisfying. Our suite of products and services can simplify and streamline the task of preventing and managing patients’ falls, enhance patient safety, improve quality of care and reduce costs associated with bringing information technology directly to patients, families and healthcare providers. Our products and services can be used in all types of hospitals, nursing homes, adult living centers and selected outpatient care facilities domestically and internationally.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash position at December 31, 2014 was approximately $2,500,000.

Pursuant to the terms of a Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement with HealthCor Partners Fund, LP and HealthCor Hybrid Offshore Master Fund, LP (“HealthCor”) we are required to maintain a minimum cash balance $5,000,000; however, we have a waiver of the minimum cash balance requirement in place through March 31, 2015. On March 31, 2015, HealthCor reduced the minimum cash balance amount to $2,000,000 and we are in compliance with the minimum cash balance as of the date of this filing. (See NOTE 15 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further details).

On August 31, 2011, we entered into and closed a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Revolving Line”) with Comerica Bank and Bridge Bank providing for a $20,000,000 revolving line of credit. On July 31, 2014, we allowed the Revolving Line to terminate pursuant to its terms, at which time the outstanding balance of $982,255 was repaid.

In view of these facts, our continued successful operation is dependent upon us achieving positive cash flow through operations while maintaining adequate liquidity. We expect that the cash on hand and the $6,000,000 received pursuant to the debt financing we closed on February 17, 2015 (See NOTE 15 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further details), as well as our existing and projected cash flow from billable contracts, will enable us to continue to operate for the next twelve month period. We believe that our sales and marketing plan to attract new business and our ongoing deployment and installation of units under existing hospital agreements will meet our near-term cash needs and will help us achieve future operating profitability.

At present, we have sufficient inventory to install and service a select number of large customers, but eventually we will need to address additional capital. We are currently in discussions with several entities in an effort to secure a credit facility which we expect will allow us to support our projected growth. We expect to close on a credit facility within the next 180 days; however, there are no assurances that we can close on a credit facility on terms acceptable to us or that such closing will occur.

As of December 31, 2014, our working capital was approximately $1,400,000, our accumulated deficit was approximately $91,500,000, and our stockholders’ deficit was approximately $15,300,000. Operating loss was approximately $6,800,000 and $6,900,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our net loss attributable to CareView was approximately $14,452,000 and approximately $13,619,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The following is a summary of cash flow activity for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

The decrease in cash flows used in operating activities of approximately $12,000 is primarily a result of reduction in operating expenses and an increase in revenue. The increase in cash flows used in investing activities of approximately $570,000 is directly related to the purchases and installation of CareView Systems. The increase in cash provided by financing activities of approximately $268,000 primarily reflects the 2014 $5,000,000 loan from HealthCor Partners Fund, LP and HealthCor Hybrid Offshore Master Fund, LP (as more fully described in NOTE 11 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements), partially offset by the repayment of $982,255 against the Revolving Line versus the 2013 Securities Purchase Agreement with net proceeds of approximately $2,700,000 (as more fully described in NOTE 4 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements) and the $982,255 borrowing against the Revolving Line (as more fully described in Note 12 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements).

Results of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2014 compared to year ended December 31, 2013

Revenue, net

Revenue increased approximately $1,000,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. Hospitals with billable units increased to 91 for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to 68 for the comparable period for the prior year. Of the 91 hospitals with billable units on December 31, 2014, two hospitals groups accounted for 45 and 16 of the total, respectively. Billable units (RCPs and Nurse Stations) for all hospitals totaled 5,145 (4,876 and 269, respectively) on December 31, 2014 as compared to 3,292 (3,155 and 137, respectively) on December 31, 2013.

Operating Expenses

Our principal operating costs include the following items as a percentage of total expense.

Operating expenses increased by approximately $855,000 (10%) as a result of the following items:

Human resource related costs (including salaries and benefits) decreased primarily as a result of a lower average head count in 2014 compared to 2013. While we had 48 employees at December 31, 2014 as compared to 42 for the comparable date for the prior year, on average we employed 45 employees over the course of 2014 as compared to 44 for the comparable prior year period.

Non-cash expense related to option grants increased in 2014 as a result of the amortization of the fair value of options granted in December 2013 that vested in December 2014. This increase was partially offset by reductions in amortization of the fair value of options granted in 2011 becoming fully vested in 2014.

Depreciation and amortization increased slightly for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the comparable period in 2013.

Product deployment costs increased in 2014 as a result of (i) an increase in installation activity directly related to our increase in P&S Agreements and (ii) the increase in our equipment removal reserve of approximately $220,000

Travel and entertainment expense increased as a result of increased installation and training efforts related to supporting our existing installed base.

The decrease in professional and consulting fees was primarily a result of reduced third party sales and marketing efforts to aid us with sales and contract negotiations totaling approximately $134,000.

Other increased primarily as a result of the recovery of certain property taxes in 2013 over accrued in 2012 partially offset by property tax expense incurred during 2014.

Critical Accounting Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures in the financial statements. Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if:

We base our estimates and judgments on our experience, our current knowledge, our beliefs of what could occur in the future, our observation of trends in the industry, information provided by our customers and information available from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We have identified the following accounting policies and estimates as those that we believe are most critical to our financial condition and results of operations and that require management’s most subjective and complex judgments in estimating the effect of inherent uncertainties: share-based compensation expense, income taxes, complex derivative financial instruments and impairment of long-lived assets.

Share-Based Compensation Expense. We calculate share-based compensation expense for option awards and certain warrant issuances (“Share-based Awards”) based on the estimated grant/issue date fair value using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model (“Black-Sholes Model”), and recognize the expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures. We have not included an estimate for forfeitures due to our limited history and we revise based on actual forfeitures each period. The Black-Scholes Model requires the use of a number of assumptions including volatility of the stock price, the weighted average risk-free interest rate, and the vesting period of the Share-based Award in determining the fair value of Share-based Awards. Although we believe our assumptions used to calculate share-based compensation expense are reasonable, these assumptions can involve complex judgments about future events, which are open to interpretation and inherent uncertainty. In addition, significant changes to our assumptions could significantly impact the amount of expense recorded in a given period.

Income Taxes. As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. Our provision for income taxes is determined using the asset and liability approach to account for income taxes. A current liability is recorded for the estimated taxes payable for the current year. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the timing differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of changes in tax rates or tax laws are recognized in the provision for income taxes in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount more-likely-than-not to be realized. Changes in valuation allowances will flow through the statement of operations unless related to deferred tax assets that expire unutilized or are modified through translation, in which case both the deferred tax asset and related valuation allowance are similarly adjusted. Where a valuation allowance was established through purchase accounting for acquired deferred tax assets, any future change will be credited or charged to income tax expense.

The determination of our provision for income taxes requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. In the ordinary course of our business, there are transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. In spite of our belief that we have appropriate support for all the positions taken on our tax returns, we acknowledge that certain positions may be successfully challenged by the taxing authorities. We determine the tax benefits more likely than not to be recognized with respect to uncertain tax positions. Although we believe our recorded tax assets and liabilities are reasonable, tax laws and regulations are subject to interpretation and inherent uncertainty; therefore, our assessments can involve both a series of complex judgments about future events and rely on estimates and assumptions. Although we believe these estimates and assumptions are reasonable, the final determination could be materially different than that which is reflected in our provision for income taxes and recorded tax assets and liabilities.

Complex Derivative Financial Instruments. From time to time we sell common stock and we issue convertible debt, both with common stock purchase warrants, which may include terms requiring conversion price or exercise price adjustments based on subsequent issuance of securities at prices lower than those in the agreements of such securities. In these situations, the instruments may be accounted for as liabilities and recorded at fair value each reporting period. Due to the complexity of the agreement, we used an outside expert to assist in providing the mark to market fair valuation of the liabilities over the reporting periods in which the original agreement was in effect. It was determined that a Binomial Lattice option pricing model using a Monte Carlo simulation would provide the most accuracy given all the potential variables encompassing a future dilutive event. This model incorporated transaction assumptions such as our stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as estimates about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior. Although we believe our estimates and assumptions used to calculate the fair valuation liabilities and related expense were reasonable, these assumptions involved complex judgments about future events, which are open to interpretation and inherent uncertainty. In addition, significant changes to our assumptions could significantly impact the amount of expense recorded in a given period.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. Carrying values of property and equipment and finite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying values may not be recoverable. If impairment indicators are present, we determine whether an impairment loss should be recognized by testing the applicable asset or asset group’s carrying value for recoverability. This assessment requires the exercise of judgment in assessing the future use of and projected value to be derived from the eventual disposal of the assets to be held and used. Assessments also consider changes in asset utilization, including the temporary idling of capacity and the expected timing for placing this capacity back into production. If the carrying value of the assets is not recoverable, then a loss is recorded for the difference between the assets’ fair value and respective carrying value. The fair value of the assets is determined using an “income approach” based upon a forecast of all the expected discounted future net cash flows associated with the subject assets. Some of the more significant estimates and assumptions include: market size and growth, market share, projected selling prices, manufacturing cost and discount rate. Our estimates are based upon historical experience, commercial relationships, market conditions and available external information about future trends.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 supersedes most of the existing guidance on revenue recognition in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. The core principle of the revenue model is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. In applying the revenue model to contracts within its scope, an entity will need to (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU No. 2014-09 is effective for public entities for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The ASU allows for either full retrospective adoption, where the standard is applied to all of the periods presented, or modified retrospective adoption, where the standard is applied only to the most current period presented in the financial statements. We are currently assessing the impact of this standard to our consolidated financial statements.

Recent Events Since December 31, 2014

Rockwell Project Notes and Preferential Returns Extensions

On February 19, 2015, the due dates on the Rockwell Project Notes and Rockwell’s Preferential Returns were extended to June 30, 2016.

Fifth Amendment to the Purchase Agreement with HealthCor

On February 17, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), we closed on the below described funding transaction in which we received $6,000,000. On December 15, 2014 we entered into a Fifth Amendment to Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Fifth Amendment”) with the HealthCor and certain additional investors thereto (such additional investors, the “New Investors” and, collectively with the HealthCor, the “Investors”) to sell and issue (I) additional notes in the initial aggregate principal amount of $6,000,000 ($5,000,000 from the New Investors and $1,000,000 from HealthCor), with a conversion price per share equal to $0.52 (subject to adjustment as described therein) (the “Fifth Amendment Notes”) and (ii) additional warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to 3,692,308 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price per share equal to $0.52 (subject to adjustment as described therein) (the “Fifth Amendment Warrants”). The New Investors include, but are not limited to all but one of our current directors and one of our officers. On the Closing Date, each of the Investors severally, not jointly, purchased the Fifth Amendment Notes and the Fifth Amendment Warrants.

2015 Stock Option Plan

On February 25, 2015, we established the CareView Communications, Inc. 2015 Stock Option Plan (the “2015 Plan”) pursuant to which 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock was reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options (“2015 Plan Option(s)”). The 2015 Plan was designed to serve as an incentive for retaining qualified and competent key employees, officers and directors.

On February 25, 2015, we granted options to purchase an aggregate of 1,565,000 shares of our Common Stock to employees, including an option for the purchase of 1,000,000 shares to Sandra K. McRee, our Chief Operating Officer. This granted included 56,444 shares from our 2009 Plan (which closed the 2009 Plan) and 1,508,556 from our 2015 Plan. On February 25, 2015, we also granted 2015 Plan Options to the following members of the Board of Directors: (i) Steven G. Johnson, 1,000,000; (ii) Jeffrey C. Lightcap, 150,000; (iii) L. Allen Wheeler, 150,000; and (iv) Steven B. Epstein, 50,000. Mr. Johnson and Mr. Lightcap declined their grants of 1,000,000 and 150,000, respectively. All February 25, 2015 grants are exercisable at $0.53 per share. The 2015 Plan Options vest over three years and have an exercise period of ten years from the date of issuance.

Sixth Amendment to the 2011 Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement

On March 31, 2015, we entered into a Sixth Amendment to the Purchase Agreement with Investors (the “Sixth Amendment”) wherein the requirement to maintain a minimum cash balance of $5,000,000 was reduced to a minimum cash balance amount of $2,000,000. The Sixth Amendment also includes the issuance of 1,000,000 warrants to purchase our Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.53. See Item 9B for further details.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2014, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements.

Contractual Arrangements

Provided in the table below are our known contractual obligations as of December 31, 2014 for the future periods as indicated.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 229.10(f)(1) and are not required to provide information under this item.

Financial statements begin on page F-1 following this Report.

Not Applicable.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of December 31, 2014, management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon the evaluation, due to the presence of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting that is described below, our chief executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level. However, as of the date of this filing, this material weakness in internal controls has been remedied as described below.

There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurances of achieving their control objectives.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is defined as a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and principal financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2014 because of the identification of the material weakness identified below.

In connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, management and our independent registered public accounting firm identified the following material weakness:

Accounting for Debt Discounts and Beneficial Conversion Features

As of December 31, 2014, we had not implemented effective internal controls over the effective interest rate calculation associated with our amortization of debt discounts related to our convertible debt issuances. This material weakness resulted in a restatement of the 2013 consolidated financial statements presented in this filing.

Management’s Plan for Remediation of Our Material Weakness

In 2015, we have implemented the use of specialized software to assist management in the calculation of amortization of debt discounts in accordance with the effective interest method as prescribed by the accounting standards. A knowledgeable person within the Company will perform or supervise the performance of additional accounting and financial analyses and other post-closing procedures including detailed validation work with regard to debt discount balances, additional analysis on interest expense and managerial review of all significant related account balances and disclosures, to ensure that the Company’s Annual Report and the consolidated financial statements forming part thereof are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, as of the date of this filing, the material weakness has been remediated.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Sixth Amendment to the 2011 Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement

As previously reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 27, 2011, we entered into a Purchase Agreement dated April 21, 2011 (as subsequently amended) with HealthCor. As previously reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 19, 2014, we entered into the Fifth Amendment with HealthCor and the New Investors.

On March 31, 2015, we entered into the Sixth Amendment pursuant to which, among other things, (i) the requirement to maintain a minimum cash balance of $5,000,000 was reduced to a minimum cash balance of $2,000,000 and (ii) the amendment provision was revised to permit the Purchase Agreement to be amended by the Company and the holders of the majority of the Common Stock underlying the outstanding notes and warrants to purchase shares of our Common Stock sold pursuant to the Purchase Agreement (on an as-converted basis). The foregoing description of the Sixth Amendment is qualified, in its entirety, by reference to the Sixth Amendment, a copy of which is attached as an exhibit hereto.

On March 31, 2015, we issued a warrant to HealthCor to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of our Common Stock in consideration for certain prior waivers of the minimum cash balance requirement in the Purchase Agreement (the “Warrant”). The Warrant has an exercise price per share equal to $0.53 (subject to adjustment as described therein) and an expiration date of March 31, 2025. We relied upon the exemption from registration provided by Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the issuance of this Warrant. The foregoing description of the Warrant is qualified, in its entirety, by reference to the form of Warrant, a copy of which is attached as an exhibit hereto.

PART III

Directors, Executive Officers, Promoter and Control Persons

The following table sets forth information on our executive officers and directors as of the filing of this Report. All executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The term of office of each of our directors expire at our next Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. We do not have any promoters or control persons.

Mr. Lightcap was elected to serve on our Board of Directors pursuant to the terms of the HealthCor Note Purchase Agreement executed on April 21, 2011. Other than Mr. Lightcap, there are no arrangements or understandings between our directors and executive officers and any other person pursuant to which any director or officer was or is to be selected as a director or officer, and there are no arrangements, plans or understandings as to whether non-management shareholders will exercise their voting rights to continue to elect the current board of directors. There are also no arrangements, agreements or understandings to our knowledge between non-management shareholders that may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of our affairs.

Anthony P. Piccin resigned as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary on September 6, 2013. Until such time as those positions are filled, Steven Johnson, our Chief Executive Officer and President, will also serve as our Secretary and Treasurer. In addition, L. Allan Wheeler, our Chairman of the Board and former chairman of the Audit Committee, will serve as our Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer as those positions relate to our annual and quarterly filings with the SEC.

Identification of Certain Significant Employees

Kyle Johnson, our Director of Technology, and Matthew E. Jackson, General Counsel, are considered significant employees. An overview of their business experience follows in Business Experience found within this Item 10.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between our officers and directors.

Business Experience of Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Employees

The business experience of each of our directors, executive officers and significant employee follows:

Steve G. Johnson – Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer, Director

Steven G. Johnson currently serves as Chief Executive Officer (effective January 1, 2014), President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director. Mr. Johnson also served as Chief Operating Officer until November 1, 2013. In December 2003, he filed for patent protection as the inventor of a Non-Intrusive Data Transmission Network for Use in an Enterprise Facility and Method for Implementing in the United States, which invention was subsequently assigned to CareView and was issued a patent number by the USPTO. The technology underlying this patent is the basis of the CareView System suite. Mr. Johnson is also one of the inventors on three issued patents for a Non-intrusive data transmission network for use in an enterprise facility and method for implementing in the U.S., a System and Method for Documenting Patient Procedures in the U.S., and a System and Method for Using a Video Monitoring System to Prevent and Manage Decubitus Ulcers in Patients in the U.S., and five additional pending patent applications for a System and Method for Predicting Falls in the U.S., a continuation patent for System and Method for Using a Video Monitoring System to Prevent and Manage Decubitus Ulcers, an Electronic Patient Sitter Management System and Method for Implementing in the U.S., a Noise Correcting Patient Fall Risk State System and Method for Predicting Patient Falls in the U.S., and a System and method for monitoring a fall state of a patient and minimizing false alarms in the U.S., all technology currently being deployed or in further development by CareView. Mr. Johnson has over 20 years of experience in the cable and wireless business.

Before joining CareView in 2006, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Cadco Systems, a manufacturer of CATV and telecommunications equipment from 1997. From February 1991 to February 1996, he served as CEO, President and Director of American Wireless Systems, which he restructured and sold to Heartland Wireless Communications. Mr. Johnson also served as founder and President of Hanover Systems, a manufacturer of telecommunications equipment. Mr. Johnson has been actively involved with the wireless cable industry since 1984 and has served on the board of directors of the Wireless Cable Association and its FCC regulatory committee. Mr. Johnson developed various electronic telecommunications equipment for the wireless cable industry including microwave downconverters, wireless cable set top converters, antennas, and transmitters. Mr. Johnson’s accumulated knowledge in the field of technology, coupled with his development of patentable technology, makes him an invaluable member of our management team. Mr. Johnson earned his BA in Economics and Business Administration from Simpson College and currently serves as a Trustee on the Simpson College Board of Trustees. Mr. Johnson is the father of Kyle Johnson, our Director of Technology.

Sandra K. McRee – Chief Operating Officer

Sandra K. McRee joined CareView as Chief Operating Officer effective November 1, 2013. Ms. McRee also currently serves as President of McRee Consulting. Ms. McRee most recently served as the Vice Chair of the Board of Directors of IASIS Healthcare Corporation (“IASIS”) from April 2010 until October 2011. Previously, she served as Chief Operating Officer of IASIS from May 2001 until October 2010, and President from May 2004 to April 2010. At IASIS, she was responsible for overseeing all aspects of IASIS’s hospital operations and was responsible for overseeing clinical systems; developing an appropriate mix of quality services, physician relationships, effective staffing and supply utilization; and managing capital investments related to operations. From April 1999 through May 2001, Ms. McRee was Regional Vice President for Province Healthcare Corporation where she oversaw five facilities in Florida, Louisiana and Mississippi. Ms. McRee has more than 35 years of healthcare management experience. Ms. McRee has spent her entire professional career in the healthcare industry. She currently serves on the Board of Directors of Denver School of Nursing. Ms. McRee previously served on the Boards of EDCare, a national emergency room management company owned by Gemini Investors from August 2005 to July 2008, Mid-Western University from July 2000 to August 2004 and All About Women. Ms. McRee is a member of Women Business Leaders of the U.S. HealthCare Industry Foundation, a nonprofit organization that was established in 2001 to address the unique needs of women serving in a senior executive capacity in the U.S. healthcare industry and was a member of the Executive Leadership Team of Go Red for Women.

L. Allen Wheeler – Chairman of the Board, Principal Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer

Mr. Wheeler has served as a Director of CareView since January 2006 and on January 1, 2014 became our Chairman of the Board. In addition, he currently serves as our Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer while we seek a qualified candidate to fill those positions. Mr. Wheeler has been a private investor for over 40 years with interests in nursing homes, real estate, cable, television and radio stations, real estate and ranching. Mr. Wheeler is the former Chairman of the Board of Texoma Medical Center and former President of the Durant Industrial Authority. Mr. Wheeler’s knowledge of the healthcare industry (as it relates to nursing homes), his technical knowledge of the broadcast television industry, and his expertise relative to investments and equity placements, qualifies him as a significant member of our board of directors. Mr. Wheeler earned his B.A. from Southeastern Oklahoma State University.

Jeffrey D. Lightcap – Director

Mr. Lightcap was elected as a Director of CareView on April 21, 2011. Mr. Lightcap is a Senior Managing Director at HealthCor Partners, having joined HealthCor Partners in October 2006. From 1997 to mid-2006, Mr. Lightcap served as a Senior Managing Director at JLL Partners, a leading middle-market private equity firm. Prior to JLL Partners, Mr. Lightcap served as a Managing Director at Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. in charge of leverage buyout coverage for Merrill Lynch’s mergers and acquisitions group. Prior to joining Merrill Lynch, Mr. Lightcap was a Senior Vice President in the mergers and acquisitions group at Kidder, Peabody & Co. and briefly at Salomon Brothers. Mr. Lightcap received a BE in Mechanical Engineering from the State University of New York at Stony Brook in 1981 and in 1985 received an MBA from the University of Chicago.

David R. White – Director

David R. White was elected as Director effective January 1, 2014. Mr. White served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of IASIS from December 1, 2000 to November 1, 2010 and continues to serve as the Chairman of IASIS’s Board of Directors. He served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of LifeTrust, an assisted living company, from November 1998 to November 2000. From June 1994 to September 1998, Mr. White served as President of the Atlantic Group at Columbia/HCA, where he was responsible for 45 hospitals located in nine states. He has also served as Regional Vice President of Republic Health Corporation and as an Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer at Community Health Systems, Inc. Mr. White earned a BS in Business Administration from the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, Tennessee in 1970, and an MS in Healthcare Administration from Trinity University in San Antonio, Texas in 1973. He currently also serves on the Board of Directors at Corindus, Inc., a robotic medical device company.

Jason T. Thompson - Director

Jason T. Thompson was elected as a Director of CareView effective as of January 1, 2014. Mr. Thompson is an attorney and a member of the transactional group of Michael Best & Friedrich LLP where he focuses on mergers and acquisitions and general corporate matters, having joined Michael Best in September 2006. Mr. Thompson assists his clients with negotiating and structuring many types of transactions and agreements, including those related to corporate reorganizations, buyout transactions and venture capital investment transactions. In addition, he is President of Thompson Family Holdings, LLC, which invests in, and consults for, a number of healthcare companies, having joined Thompson Holdings in 2010. From 1999 to 2004, Mr. Thompson served as Vice President of Development and Planning for Bulk Petroleum Corporation, where he oversaw sales, operations, client maintenance, scheduling accounting and workforce management for its construction projects. Prior to joining Bulk Petroleum, Mr. Thompson was a senior auditor with Arthur Andersen. He is a certified public accountant. Mr. Thompson received a BBA in Accounting from the University of Wisconsin – Madison in 1996 and in 2006, received his JD from the University of Wisconsin, where he was a member of the Wisconsin Law Review. His business, accounting and legal experience makes him well-suited to serve as one of the Company’s directors.

Steven B Epstein - Director

Steven B. Epstein was elected as a Director of CareView effective as of April 1, 2014. Mr. Epstein is the founder of Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., a leading law firm in health care law with over 250 lawyers in 10 cities, where he serves as senior health partner. Mr. Epstein is a pioneer in the legal specialty known as health care law and provides a wide range of health care organizations and providers with strategic legal guidance responding to the legal challenges and opportunities of the rapidly changing American health care system. Mr. Epstein was instrumental in the acceptance of managed care as the prominent form of health care delivery and has been referred to as the “father of the healthcare [legal] industry”. Prior to founding Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., Mr. Epstein joined the Wall Street law firm Barrett Knapp Smith & Shapiro where he served as a legal consultant to the Health Maintenance Organization Service, Health Services and Mental Health Administration, and US Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Mr. Epstein received his Bachelors of Arts from Tufts University in 1965 and his Juris Doctor from Columbia Law School in 1968. He is the recipient of Columbia University’s Distinguished Alumni Award and Columbia Law School’s Medal for Excellence and currently serves as chairman of the Columbia Law School Board of Visitors. Mr. Epstein sits on the Boards of a number of healthcare companies and venture capital firms.

Dr. James R. Higgins - Director

Dr. James R. Higgins was elected as a director of CareView effective as of April 1, 2014. Dr. Higgins is a cardiologist practicing in Tulsa, Oklahoma. In addition to being boarded in cardiology he has sub specialty boards in nuclear cardiology, electrophysiology, invasive cardiology, cardiac CT angiography, echocardiography, carotid and peripheral sonography, pacemakers and defibrillators. He graduated summa cum laude with a BS degree in electrical engineering from South Dakota State University and sum cum laude with a MD degree from the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry. He was an extern at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and intern, resident, and chief resident at Barnes Hospital, Washington University, in St. Louis Missouri. His cardiology fellowship was obtained at the University of California, San Francisco, Moffitt and Long Hospital. He was then the Director of research and invasive cardiology at Wilford Hall Medical Center, United States Air Force, San Antonio, Texas. In addition to his busy cardiology practice, Dr. Higgins has started and owns a real estate company, an electronic medical billing company, an oil pipeline supply company, and has a large cattle ranch operation in Oklahoma. He has published more than 300 peer review articles and has multiple patents on medical devices, mainly related to pacemakers and internal defibrillators.

Kyle Johnson - Director of Technology

Kyle Johnson has served as our Director of Technology since August 2006 and is responsible for the design and development of our Room Control Platform and deployment of systems to hospitals. From June 2004 to August 2006, he served as Senior Product Manager of Cadco Systems, a company that specializes in broadband electronic design and manufacturing. As Senior Project Manager, Mr. Johnson managed the design and development of several products including the development of the technology used in the CareView System suite. Mr. Johnson is also one of the inventors on one issued patent for a System and Method for Using a Video Monitoring System to Prevent and Manage Decubitus Ulcers in Patients in the U.S. and an additional pending patent application for a System and Method for Predicting Falls in the U.S. (the technology underlying CareView’s Virtual Bed Rails). From February 2000 to June 2004, Mr. Johnson served as General Manager and Chief Engineer for 391 Communications, a company that is a service provider to cable and wireless cable companies. Mr. Johnson has been involved in several large scale deployments of CATV, MMDS, and DBS satellite systems, as well as designing and building numerous CATV/MMDS head-ends for major domestic and foreign CATV/MMDS providers. Mr. Johnson is the son of Steven Johnson, our Chief Executive Officer and President.

Matthew E. Jackson – General Counsel

Mr. Jackson joined CareView in 2012. Mr. Jackson is responsible for all company legal matters including drafting and negotiating contracts, litigation, risk management, labor and employment, corporate securities and corporate governance. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Jackson practiced as a civil trial lawyer specializing in business litigation and transactional law. Mr. Jackson graduated from the University of Santa Barbara with a Bachelor of Science in Geology and earned his Juris Doctor from Whittier Law School.

Other Directorships

Other than as indicated within this section at Business Experience, none of our directors hold or have been nominated to hold a directorship in any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act (the “Act”) or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Committees of the Board

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee reviews and discusses the audited consolidated financial statements with management, discusses with our independent registered public accounting firm matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 16 (Communications with Audit Committees) and Rule 3520 (Auditor Independence), and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the inclusion of our audited financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our Audit Committee’s primary function is to provide advice with respect to our financial matters and to assist our Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding finance, accounting, and legal compliance. The Audit Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities are to: (i) serve as an independent and objective party to monitor our financial reporting process and internal control system, (ii) review and appraise the audit efforts of our independent registered accounting firm, (iii) evaluate our quarterly financial performance as well as its compliance with laws and regulations, (iv) oversee management’s establishment and enforcement of financial policies and business practices, and (v) provide an open avenue of communication among the independent accountants, management and our Board of Directors.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, and as of the filing date of this Report, our Audit Committee consisted of three members of our Board of Directors, namely Jason Thompson as Chair, Allen Wheeler and Jeffrey Lightcap. Messrs. Thompson and Lightcap are deemed to be financial experts. Although our Board of Directors believes the members of our Audit Committee will exercise their judgment independently, no member is totally free of relationships that, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, might interfere with their exercise of independent judgment as a committee member. The Audit Committee’s Chair and members are to be designated annually by a majority vote of the Board of Directors. Any member may be removed at any time, with or without cause, and vacancies may be filled by a majority vote of the Board of Directors.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee’s function is to provide assistance to our Board of Directors in fulfilling their responsibility to our shareholders, potential shareholders, and the investment community relating to developing policies and making specific recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to the direct and indirect compensation of our executive officers. The goal of such policies is to ensure that an appropriate relationship exists between executive pay and the creation of shareholder value, while at the same time motivating and retaining key employees. Our Compensation Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities are to: (i) review and approve our Company’s goals relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, evaluate the Chief Executive Officer’s performance with respect to those goals, and set the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation based on that evaluation; (ii) assess the contributions of individual executives and recommend to our Board of Directors levels of salary and incentive compensation payable to them; (iii) compare compensation levels with those of other leading companies in the industry; (iv) grant stock incentives to key employees and administer our stock incentive plans; (v) monitor compliance with legal prohibition on loans to directors and executive officers; and (vi) recommend to our Board of Directors compensation packages for new corporate officers and termination packages for corporate officers as requested.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, and as of the filing date of this Report, our Compensation Committee consisted of three members of ours Board of Directors, namely Allen Wheeler as Chair, Jeffrey Lightcap and David White. Although our Board of Directors believes the members of our Compensation Committee will exercise their judgment independently, no member is totally free of relationships that, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, might interfere with their exercise of independent judgment as a committee member. Our Compensation Committee’s Chair and members are to be designated annually by a majority vote of our Board. Any member may be removed at any time, with or without cause, and vacancies may be filled by a majority vote of our Board.

Nominating Committee

We do not currently have a Nominating Committee; therefore, our Board, as a whole, identifies director nominees by reviewing the desired experience, mix of skills and other qualities to assure appropriate Board composition, taking into consideration our current Board members and the specific needs of our Company and our Board. Among the qualifications to be considered in the selection of candidates, our Board considers the following attributes and criteria of candidates: experience, knowledge, skills, expertise, diversity, personal and professional integrity, character, business judgment and independence. Our Board recognizes that nominees for the Board should reflect a reasonable diversity of backgrounds and perspectives, including those backgrounds and perspectives with respect to business experience, professional expertise, age, gender and ethnic background. Nominations for the election of directors may be made by any member of the Board.

Our Board will also evaluate whether the nominee’s skills are complementary to the existing Board members’ skills; our Board’s needs for operational, management, financial, technological or other expertise; and whether the individual has sufficient time to devote to the interests of our Company. The prospective Board member cannot be a board member or officer at a competing company nor have relationships with a competing company and must be clear of any investigation or violations that would be perceived as affecting the duties and performance of a director.

Our Board identifies nominees by first evaluating the current members of our Board willing to continue in service. Current members of our Board with skills and experience that are relevant to the business and who are willing to continue in service are considered for re-nomination, balancing the value of continuity of service by existing members of the Board with that of obtaining a new perspective. If any member of our Board does not wish to continue in service, or if our Board decides not to nominate a member for re-election, our Board identifies the desired skills and experience of a new nominee and discusses with our Board suggestions as to individuals that meet the criteria.

Our Board is comprised of accomplished professionals who represent diverse and key areas of expertise including national business, operations, manufacturing, government, finance and investing, management, entrepreneurship, higher education and science, research and technology. We believe our directors’ wide range of professional experiences and backgrounds, education and skills has proven invaluable to our Company and we intend to continue leveraging this strength.

Board Involvement in Risk Oversight

Our Board of Directors is responsible for oversight of our risk assessment and management process. We believe risk can arise in every decision and action taken by us, whether strategic or operational. Our comprehensive approach is reflected in the reporting processes by which our management provides timely information to our Board of Directors to support its role in oversight, approval and decision-making.

Our Board of Directors closely monitors the information it receives from management and provides oversight and guidance to our management team concerning the assessment and management of risk. Our Board of Directors approves our high level goals, strategies and policies to set the tone and direction for appropriate risk taking within the business.

Our Board of Directors serving on the Compensation Committee have basic responsibility for oversight of management’s compensation risk assessment, and that committee reports to the Board on its review. Our Board of Directors also delegated tasks related to risk process oversight to our Audit Committee, which reports the results of its review process to our Board of Directors. The Audit Committee’s process includes a review, at least annually, of our internal audit process, including the organizational structure, as well as the scope and methodology of the internal audit process. The Board, as a whole, functions as the nominating committee to oversee risks related to our corporate governance, including director performance, director succession, director education and governance documents.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all of our directors and executive officers. This code is intended to focus the members of our Board of Directors and each executive officer on areas of ethical risk, provide guidance to directors and executive officers to help them recognize and deal with ethical issues, provide mechanisms to report unethical conduct, and help foster a culture of honesty and accountability. All members of our Board of Directors and all executive officers are required to sign this code on an annual basis.

Code of Ethics for Financial Executives

Our Board of Directors adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to all financial executives and any other senior officer with financial oversight responsibilities. This code governs the professional and ethical conduct of our financial executives, and directs that they: (i) act with honesty and integrity; (ii) provide information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, and timely; (iii) comply with federal, state, and local rules and regulations; (iv) act in good faith with due care, competence and diligence; and (v) respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of their work and not use the information acquired for personal gain. All of our financial executives are required to sign this code on an annual basis.

Insider Trading Policy

Our Board of Directors adopted an Insider Trading Policy applicable to all directors and officers. Insider trading generally refers to the buying or selling of a security in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence while in possession of material, non-public information about the security. Insider trading violations may also include ‘tipping’ such information, securities trading by the person ‘tipped,’ and securities trading by those who misappropriate such information. The scope of insider trading violations can be wide reaching. As such, our Insider Trading Policy outlines the definitions of insider trading, the penalties and sanctions determined, and what constitutes material, non-public information. Illegal insider trading is against our policy as such trading can cause significant harm to our reputation for integrity and ethical conduct. Individuals who fail to comply with the requirements of the policy are subject to disciplinary action including dismissal for cause. All members of our Board of Directors and all executive officers are required to ratify the terms of this policy on an annual basis.

Whistleblower Policy

Our Board of Directors adopted a Whistleblower Policy to establish and maintain a complaint program to facilitate (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding our accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing matters or violations of the Code of Conduct and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. Any person with a concern relating to the Accounting Policies or compliance with our Code of Conduct should submit their concern in writing to the Chair of our Audit Committee. Complaints may be made without fear of dismissal, disciplinary action or retaliation of any kind. We will not discharge, discipline, demote, suspend, threaten or in any manner discriminate against any officer or employee in the terms and conditions of employment based on any lawful actions with respect to (i) good faith reporting of concerns or complaints regarding Accounting Policies, or otherwise specified in Section 806 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (ii) compliance with our Code of Conduct or (iii) providing assistance to the Audit Committee, management or any other person or group, including any governmental, regulatory or law enforcement body, investigating a concern.

Related Party Transactions Policy

Our Board of Directors adopted a Related Party Transactions Policy as we recognize that transactions involving related parties present a heightened risk of conflicts of interest and/or improper valuation (or the perception thereof). Therefore, our Board determined that our Audit Committee shall review, approve and, if necessary, recommend to the Board for its approval all related party transactions and any material amendments to such related party transactions. Our Board may determine that a particular related party transaction or a material amendment thereto shall instead be reviewed and approved by a majority of directors disinterested in the related party transaction. No director shall participate in any approval of a related party transaction for which the director is a related party, except that the director shall provide all material information concerning the related party transaction to the committee. Our President is responsible for providing to the Audit Committee, on a quarterly basis, a summary of all payments made by or to us in connection with duly approved related party transactions during the preceding fiscal quarter. The President is responsible for reviewing and approving all payments made by or to us in connection with duly approved related party transactions and shall certify to the Audit Committee that any payments made by or to us in connection with such related party transactions have been made in accordance with the policy. All related party transactions shall be disclosed in our applicable filings as required by the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and related rules and regulations.

Committee Charters, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and Codes of Ethics

Our Board of Directors adopted charters for the Audit and Compensation Committees describing the authority and responsibilities delegated to each committee. We post on our website the charters of our Audit and Compensation Committees, our Code of Conduct and Ethics, our Code of Ethics for Financial Executive, and any amendments or waivers thereto applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions; and any other corporate governance materials contemplated by SEC regulations. These documents are also available in print to any stockholder requesting a copy in writing from our Secretary at our executive offices set forth in this Report.

Board Meetings and Committees; Annual Meeting Attendance

We held five meetings of the Board of Directors during the year ended December 31, 2014 and conducted other business through unanimous written actions.

Indemnification

Section 145 of the Nevada Corporation Law provides in relevant parts as follows:

(1) A corporation shall have power to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action, suit, or proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit, or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or on a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.

(2) A corporation shall have power to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and except that no indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue, or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable for negligence or misconduct in the performance of his duty to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine on application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which such court shall deem proper.

(3) To the extent that a director, officer, employee, or agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit, or proceeding referred to in (1) or (2) of this subsection, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, he shall be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection therewith.

(4) The indemnification provided by this section shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification may be entitled under any bylaws, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in his official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such office, and shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee, or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, and administrators of such a person.

The foregoing discussion of indemnification merely summarizes certain aspects of indemnification provisions and is limited by reference to the above discussed sections of the Nevada Corporation Law.

Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that we may indemnify to the full extent of its power to do so, all directors, officers, employees, and/or agents. Insofar as indemnification by us for liabilities arising under the Securities Act that may be permitted to our officers and directors pursuant to the foregoing provisions or otherwise, we are aware that in the opinion of the Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

Summary Compensation Table

The table below shows certain compensation information for services rendered in all capacities for the last two fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. The information includes the dollar value of base salaries, bonus awards, the number of non-qualified stock options (“Options”) granted and certain other compensation, if any, whether paid or deferred.

_____________

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The table below shows outstanding equity awards for our executive officers as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which equity awards consists solely of ten-year, non-qualified stock options (the “Options”). No executive officers have exercised any of their Options.

 ________________

Employment Agreements with Executive Officers

We have no employment agreements with our executive officers.

Director Compensation

We do not pay cash fees to directors who attend regularly scheduled and special board meetings; however, we may reimburse out-of-state directors for costs associated with travel and lodging to attend such meetings. Our directors may also be granted non-qualified stock options from time to time.

We paid no compensation to our directors for services rendered for the year ended December 31, 2014. The table below shows outstanding equity awards for our directors who are not executive officers, which equity awards consists solely of ten-year, non-qualified stock options. No options have been exercised.

 _________________________

Beneficial Security Ownership Table

As of the date of this filing, the following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock by (i) each shareholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of our Common Stock, (ii) by each of our current directors and executive officers as identified herein, and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of Common Stock and non-qualified stock options (“Options”), common stock purchase warrants (“Warrants”), and convertible securities that are currently exercisable or convertible into shares of our Common Stock within sixty (60) days of the date of this document, are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding the Options, Warrants, or convertible securities for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise noted, the address for all officers and directors listed below is 405 State Highway 121, Suite B-240, Lewisville, Texas 75067.

  ______________ 

This amount includes (i) 430,769 shares due to Lightcap upon exercise of vested Warrants, (ii) 70,257 vested Warrants held in trust for Lightcap’s minor children, (iii) 1,365,800 shares that may be acquired upon conversion of convertible debt dated February 17, 2015 (including interest paid in kind through May 30, 2015), and (iv) 222,756 shares that may be acquired upon conversion of convertible debt dated February 17, 2015 (including interest paid in kind through May 30, 2015) held in trust for Lightcap’s minor children.

The percentage of class for Reporting Persons and Lightcap as an individual is based on 206,221,481 shares which would be outstanding if the Reporting Persons notes and convertible debt held Lightcap and his minor children were converted and all Warrants held by the Reporting Persons and Lightcap and his minor children were exercised.

Under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act, our officers, directors and beneficial shareholders may sell up to one percent (1%) of the total outstanding shares (or an amount of shares equal to the average weekly reported volume of trading during the four calendar weeks preceding the sale) every three months provided that (1) current public information is available about our Company, (2) the shares have been fully paid for at least one year, (3) the shares are sold in a broker’s transaction or through a market-maker, and (4) the seller files a Form 144 with the SEC if seller is an affiliate.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we acknowledge that none of our officers or directors failed to file on a timely basis certain ownership forms required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

Exclusive of the Fifth Amendment discussed above in Item 7 none of our directors, officers or principal shareholders, nor any associate or affiliate of the foregoing, has any interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction or in any proposed transaction, which materially affected us during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Related Party Transactions Policy

As indicated hereinabove, our Board of Directors adopted a Related Party Transactions Policy and all related party transactions will be disclosed in our applicable filings as required by the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and related rules and regulations.

Director Independence

Although our Board of Directors believes that our directors will exercise their judgment independently, no director is totally free of relationships that, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, might interfere with their exercise of independent judgment as a director.

Promoters and Certain Control Persons

None.

Audit Fees. The aggregate amount expected to be billed for professional services rendered by BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”) for the 2014 quarterly reviews and the annual integrated audit for the year ended December 31, 2014 is estimated to be $260,000. BDO billed us $145,000 for professional services rendered for the annual audit fee for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for quarterly review of our financial statements for 2013, and other services that are normally provided by an accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the fiscal year.

Tax Fees. The aggregate amount expected to be billed for tax return preparation for the year ended December 31, 2014 rendered by BDO is approximately $32,000. BDO billed us $33,000 for tax return preparation for the year ended December 31, 2013.

All Other Fees. We incurred no other fees for the 2014 and 2013 fiscal years.

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors adopted a policy requiring that it pre-approve all fees paid to our independent registered public accounting firm, regardless of the type of service. All non-audit services were reviewed with the Audit Committee, which concluded that the provision of such services by BDO USA, LLP was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

___________________

* Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Steven G. Johnson and L. Allen Wheeler and each of them, his attorney-in-fact with power of substitution for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments, supplements or other documents relating to this Annual Report on Form 10-K he deems necessary or appropriate, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the SEC, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact or their substitute may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

CareView Communications, Inc.

Lewisville, TX

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CareView Communications, Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CareView Communications, Inc. at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the 2013 financial statements have been restated to correct a misstatement.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

Dallas, TX

March 31, 2015

The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.