CASSAVA SCIENCES INC - Annual Report: 2005 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number: 000-29959
Pain Therapeutics, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 91-1911336 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
Remi Barbier
President and Chief Executive Officer
416 Browning Way
South San Francisco, CA 94080
(650) 624-8200
(Address, including zip code, or registrants principal executive offices and telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(D) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨ |
Accelerated filer x | Non-accelerated filer ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates was $296,011,004 computed by reference to the last sales price of $6.75 as reported by the Nasdaq National Market System, as of the last business day of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter, June 30, 2005.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants common stock on February 1, 2006 was 43,957,869.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Proxy Statement), to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are incorporated by reference to Part III of this Form 10-K Report.
Table of Contents
FORM 10-K
INDEX
Page | ||||
PART I | ||||
Item 1. |
2 | |||
Item 1A. |
11 | |||
Item 1B. |
24 | |||
Item 2. |
24 | |||
Item 3. |
24 | |||
Item 4. |
24 | |||
PART II | ||||
Item 5. |
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 25 | ||
Item 6. |
26 | |||
Item 7. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
27 | ||
Item 7A. |
32 | |||
Item 8. |
33 | |||
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
50 | ||
Item 9A. |
50 | |||
Item 9B. |
52 | |||
PART III | ||||
Item 10. |
52 | |||
Item 11. |
52 | |||
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 52 | ||
Item 13. |
52 | |||
Item 14. |
52 | |||
PART IV | ||||
Item 15. |
53 |
Table of Contents
PART I
This document contains forward-looking statements that are based upon current expectations that are within the meaning of the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995. We intend that such statements be protected by the safe harbor created thereby. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and our actual results and the timing of events may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Examples of such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to statements about:
| payments we may receive from our strategic alliance; |
| timing of commencement and completion of enrollment of patients for our clinical trials and the anticipated number of patients to be enrolled; |
| expected dates of announcement of achievement of our clinical milestones and results of our clinical trials; |
| potential sources of clinical and commercial supply of Remoxy and its components; |
| expansion of our product pipeline, including the formulation of additional dosage forms of Remoxy; |
| increases in our collaboration revenues and program fee revenue; |
| expectations regarding recognition of collaboration and program fee revenue; |
| future operating losses and anticipated operating and capital expenditures; |
| uses of proceeds from our securities offerings; |
| the potential benefits of our drug candidates; |
| the sufficiency of materials required for the clinical development of our drug candidates; |
| the size of the potential market for our products; |
| the utility or protection of our intellectual property; |
| expected future sources of revenue and capital or increasing cash needs; |
| potential competitors or competitive products; |
| future market acceptance of our drug candidates; |
| expenses increasing substantially or fluctuations in our operating results; |
| future expectations regarding trade secrets, technological innovations, licensing agreements and outsourcing of certain business functions; |
| anticipated hiring and development of our internal systems and infrastructure; |
| the sufficiency of our current resources to fund our operations over the next twelve months; and |
| potential future dividends. |
Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those risks and uncertainties relating to:
| the success of our collaboration agreements, including our strategic alliance with King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or King; |
| difficulties or delays in development, testing, clinical trials (including patient enrollment), regulatory approval, production and commercialization of our drug candidates; |
| unexpected adverse side effects or inadequate therapeutic efficacy of our drug candidates that could slow or prevent product approval (including the risk that current and past results of clinical trials are not indicative of future results of clinical trials); |
1
Table of Contents
| the uncertainty of patent protection for our intellectual property or trade secrets; |
| potential infringement of the intellectual property rights or trade secrets of third parties; |
| pursuing in-license and acquisition opportunities; |
| hiring and retaining personnel; and |
| our financial position and our ability to obtain additional financing if necessary. |
In addition such statements are subject to the risks and uncertainties discussed in Item 1A Risk Factors and elsewhere in this document.
Item 1. | Business |
Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the development of innovative drugs. We specialize in developing safer or more efficacious drugs for use in pain management, particularly in the area of opioid painkillers, which are sometimes referred to as narcotic painkillers. According to IMS Health, sales for opioid painkillers in the United States exceeded $6.0 billion in 2004. We incorporated in Delaware in May 1998.
Our clinical pipeline consists of proprietary drug candidates. We are currently developing two oral, small molecule drugs to treat patients who suffer from severe chronic pain, such as pain associated with advanced osteoarthritis and low-back pain. Both of our novel drug candidates are currently in Phase III clinical trial programs:
| Remoxy, an abuse-resistant version of long-acting oxycodone, and |
| Oxytrex, a new oral opioid painkiller for the treatment of severe chronic pain. |
In November 2005, we and King announced a strategic alliance to develop and commercialize Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers. King made an upfront cash payment of $150 million to us at the closing of this strategic alliance in December 2005. King is also obligated to pay us up to $150 million in payments based on the achievement of milestones in the course of clinical development of Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers under the strategic alliance. In addition, subject to certain limitations, King is obligated to fund development expenses incurred by us related to Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers pursuant to the collaboration agreement. King is obligated to fund the commercialization expenses of, and has the exclusive right to market and sell, drugs developed in connection with the strategic alliance. King is obligated to pay us a 20% royalty on net sales of drugs developed in connection with the strategic alliance, except as to the first $1 billion in net sales of such drugs, for which the royalty is set at 15%.
Remoxy
Remoxy is being developed as an abuse-resistant version of long-acting oral oxycodone. Sales of long-acting oxycodone were nearly $2.0 billion for the twelve months ended August 2005.
The active drug ingredient in Remoxy is oxycodone. Oxycodone is a strong narcotic painkiller that was developed around 1920 as a substitute for morphine. When used as prescribed, oxycodone can relieve severe chronic pain. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, or DEA, and the national media have linked illicit oxycodone use to widespread patterns of drug abuse, addiction, diversion and drug overdose. In the United States, drug related emergency room visits are reported by the Department of Health and Human Services Drug Abuse Warning Network, or DAWN. DAWN reports 22,000 oxycodone mentions in emergency room visits in 2002, a 450% increase from 4,000 oxycodone mentions in emergency room visits in 1994.
Remoxys novel formulation is specifically designed to foil abusers who attempt to tamper with the drug in order to induce a powerful euphoric high. Our clinical results to date demonstrate Remoxy is significantly less
2
Table of Contents
abusable than Oxycontin®, a brand of long-acting oxycodone. During 2004, we announced data from clinical comparisons of the two drugs. In a variety of clinical comparisons of the abuse resistant characteristics of Remoxy and Oxycontin, Oxycontin released significantly more active ingredient than Remoxy during the time when abusers presumably expect to get high.
In September 2005 we announced top line data from our Phase III clinical trial of Remoxy. In this randomized, double-blinded clinical trial of 209 osteoarthritic patients with moderate to severe chronic pain, Remoxy demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in pain (p<0.05) when compared to placebo.
In February 2006, we completed a Special Protocol Assessment, or SPA, from the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for a Phase III clinical trial of Remoxy in patients with chronic pain. Under this procedure, a sponsor may seek the FDAs agreement on the design and analysis of a clinical trial intended to form the primary basis of an effectiveness claim. If the FDA agrees in writing, its agreement may not be changed after the trial begins except in limited circumstances, such as the FDA determining that a substantial scientific issue essential to determining the safety or effectiveness of the product was identified after the trial had begun. If the outcome of the trial is successful, the sponsor will ordinarily be able to rely on the SPA as the basis for approval with respect to effectiveness. While we have received the FDAs SPA agreement for this Phase III clinical trial assessing Remoxy, there can be no assurance that this clinical trial will have a successful outcome or that we will ultimately receive approval for this drug candidate.
We expect to conduct additional clinical trials and non-clinical studies of Remoxy in 2006, including additional abuse-resistance studies and other registration-enabling studies.
We believe the abuse-resistant technology used in Remoxy is applicable to different oral opioid painkillers. Pursuant to our agreement with King, we plan to develop abuse-resistant versions of additional opioid painkillers using this platform technology. We plan to formulate and scale-up a range of dosage forms of Remoxy.
We formulate Remoxy using, in part, proprietary technology licensed from Durect Corporation. Under the terms of this agreement, we have exclusive worldwide rights to develop and to commercialize Remoxy and certain other opioid drugs that use Durects technology. We reimburse Durect for certain formulation and related work, and are responsible to make milestone payments based on the achievement of certain technical, clinical or regulatory milestones. We are responsible to pay Durect royalties on related drug sales. King is obligated to reimburse us for all costs we incur under the agreement with Durect, including royalties.
We believe we can produce sufficient clinical materials necessary to complete our Phase III program for Remoxy. We rely on Durect Corporation and other third-party manufacturers to formulate, manufacture, fill, label, ship or store Remoxy.
Oxytrex
Oxytrex is an oral opioid painkiller with a novel mechanism of action. We believe Oxytrex could be an effective substitute for oxycodone, a narcotic painkiller widely used today to treat severe chronic pain. Sales of oxycodone were nearly $2.0 billion for the twelve months ended August 2005. We have worldwide commercial rights to Oxytrex.
Our clinical results to date have shown that Oxytrex can reduce physical dependence and provides superior and prolonged pain relief compared to oxycodone. Published preclinical results also demonstrate that the technology used in Oxytrex results in a lack of opioid addiction or tolerance in animals.
In March 2005, we announced positive clinical results from a Phase III clinical trial for Oxytrex. In this variable dose clinical trial of 719 patients with severe low-back pain, Oxytrex showed minimal physical dependence, better overall safety, less drug use and similar pain relief to oxycodone. Specifically, Oxytrex
3
Table of Contents
patients reported 50% less symptoms of physical dependence and withdrawal (p<0.01) after cessation of prolonged, high-dose opioid therapy and about 20% less overall opioid-related side-effects during treatment, including less somnolence (p<0.05), less itching (p<0.05) and less moderate to severe constipation (p<0.05).
In November 2005, we announced results of a Phase III clinical trial with Oxytrex. Over 775 patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritic pain were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, multi-center clinical trial in the United States. The pre-defined primary endpoint was reduction of physical dependence and withdrawal effects in the first 24 hours following cessation of therapy, as measured on the Short Opioid Withdrawal Scale. Oxytrex patients reported 22% less clinical symptoms of physical dependence and withdrawal effects in the first 24 hours following cessation of therapy, compared to patients on oxycodone. However, this result did not reach statistical significance, which we believe was due to a higher than expected overall drop-out rate in the clinical trial.
We expect to continue clinical progress of Oxytrex in 2006. We plan to meet with the FDA in the first half of 2006 to discuss next steps in the clinical development of Oxytrex.
Oxytrex is formulated with two active drug ingredients: oxycodone and low-dose naltrexone. We rely on a limited number of third-party manufacturers to manufacture, fill, label, ship and store Oxytrex.
PTI-901
In December 2005, we announced results of a Phase III clinical trial with PTI-901, an investigational drug candidate for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome, or IBS. The clinical trial compared a daily dose of PTI-901 against placebo in 609 women with documented IBS over a three-month treatment period. PTI-901 did not demonstrate a meaningful benefit in the third month of treatment, which was the primary endpoint. According to current regulatory standards, an experimental drug for chronic IBS needs to show efficacy at the end of a three-month treatment period.
The Company believes this clinical trial was well designed to detect any durable benefits of PTI-901 versus placebo in a large patient population with IBS. Based on the adequacy of the clinical trial itself, coupled with the clinical results, we are discontinuing all further clinical development activities with PTI-901.
Strategy
Our commercial goal is to build a drug franchise in pain management. Our clinical goal is to continue to develop novel drugs that are more effective or safer than drugs used in the clinic today. Our strategy includes the following elements:
Focus on Clinical Development Stage Products. We believe this focus will enable us to generate product revenues earlier than if we were focused on early-stage research and discovery activities.
Retain Significant Rights to Our Drugs. We currently retain worldwide commercialization rights to all of our technology and drug candidates in all markets and indications, except for Remoxy and certain other abuse-resistant drug candidates that are subject to our strategic alliance with King. In general, we intend to independently develop our drug candidates through late-stage clinical trials. In market segments that require large or specialized sales forces, we may seek sales and marketing alliances with third parties.
Outsource Key Functions. We intend to continue to outsource preclinical studies, clinical trials and formulation and manufacturing activities. We believe outsourcing permits significant time savings and allows for more efficient deployment of our resources.
Pursue In-licensing or Acquisition Opportunities. We intend to evaluate promising drug candidates or technologies to further expand our product pipeline. Our in-licensing strategy consists of evaluating clinical or preclinical stage opportunities in therapeutic areas that can benefit from our core expertise in drug
4
Table of Contents
development. Such in-licensing or acquisition opportunities may be in pain management or in other therapeutic areas outside of pain management. We believe this element of our corporate strategy could diversify some of the risks inherent in focusing on a single therapeutic area and could also increase our probability of commercial success.
We also conduct basic research in collaboration with academic and other partners. Company sponsored research and development expenditures were $18.9 million, $35.1 million, and $32.9 million in 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
Oxytrex Science and Technology
Our science related to the use of opioid agonists combined with opioid antagonist and the use of opioid agonists alone was developed at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. It is well known that opioid painkillers produce their pain relieving effect by inhibiting the transmission of pain signals in certain nerve cells in the central nervous system. This inhibition of pain is achieved by inhibiting nerve cells that have opioid receptors on their membranes, via an inhibitory signaling pathway linked to the receptor. Scientists at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, however, have published results suggesting that opioid painkillers also activate an excitatory signaling pathway linked to opioid receptors, thereby stimulating the transmission of pain. This excitatory pathway counteracts pain inhibition and is believed to be a major cause of adverse side effects associated with opioid use, including the development of tolerance and addiction.
We believe that the excitatory pathway of opioid receptors contributes greatly to the adverse effects of chronic opioid use, such as tolerance, physical dependence and addiction. After repeated administration of morphine, oxycodone or other opioid painkillers, increasing doses of opioids are required in order to obtain the same level of pain relief, a process known as tolerance. If chronic opioid treatment is terminated abruptly, withdrawal symptoms rapidly appear. Continued administration of opioids prevents the appearance of withdrawal symptoms, at which point a patient is considered physically dependent. Published results in rodents also show that tolerance and physical dependence can be prevented by co-administration of low-dose naltrexone, an opioid antagonist. We believe low-dose naltrexone blocks the excitatory pathway, thus minimizing tolerance, physical dependence and addiction. In addition, preclinical work using animal models of addiction suggests that very low doses of opioid antagonists decrease the pleasurable effects and addictive potential of opioid drugs such as morphine or oxycodone.
Optimal dose ratios of low-dose opioid antagonist to opioid painkiller depend on their specific pharmacology and the mode of administration. Published preclinical and clinical dose response studies provide guidance in formulating optimal ratios of low-dose opioid antagonist to opioid painkiller for clinical development.
Oxytrex is a proprietary combination of two active drug ingredients. The first component is the opioid agonist oxycodone. The second component is an extremely low dose of the opioid antagonist naltrexone. Adding an antagonist to an agonist at usual clinical doses blocks the action of the agonist. This effect is clinically useful, for example, to reverse heroin overdose. At a very low dose, however, studies indicate that this effect is different: a very low-dose of an opioid antagonist can enhance pain relief and attenuate the development of tolerance or addiction. Oxytrex takes advantage of this effect by combining opioid agonists with low doses of opioid antagonists.
License from Albert Einstein College of Medicine
We have licensed certain technology from Albert Einstein College of Medicine. We have a worldwide exclusive license to the technology and all intellectual rights arising from the technology. Our license rights terminate upon the expiration of the patents used to protect the technology, which are scheduled to expire no earlier than September 2012. Pursuant to the agreement for the licensed technology, we are required to pay
5
Table of Contents
Albert Einstein College of Medicine clinical milestone payments and royalties based on a percentage of net drug sales. If a product is combined with a drug or other substance for which we are paying an additional royalty, the royalty that we pay to Albert Einstein College of Medicine will be reduced by up to one-half of the amount of such additional royalty.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine originally received grants from the U.S. federal government to research some of the technology that we license. The terms of these grants provide the U.S. federal government with a non-exclusive, non-transferable paid-up license to practice inventions made with federal funds. Thus, our licenses are non-exclusive to the extent of the U.S. federal governments license. If the U.S. federal government exercises its rights under this license, it could make use of the same technology that we license and the size of our potential market could thereby be reduced.
Our Intellectual Property
We seek to protect our technology by, among other methods, filing and prosecuting U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications with respect to our technology and products and their uses. We plan to prosecute and defend our patent applications, issued patents and proprietary information. Our competitive position and potential future revenues will depend in large part upon our ability to protect our intellectual property from challenges and to enforce our patent rights against potential infringements. If our competitors are able to successfully challenge the validity or scope of our patent rights, based on the existence of prior art or otherwise, they might be able to market products that contain features and clinical benefits similar to those of our products, and demand for our products could decline as a result.
The focus of our patent strategy is to secure and maintain intellectual property rights to technology for the following categories of our business:
| the clinical use of a low-dose opioid antagonist, either alone or in combination with an opioid painkiller, for pain management and opioid and other addiction; |
| the use of a low-dose opioid antagonist to render opioid-based products more effective; and |
| the clinical use of a low-dose opioid antagonist, either alone or in combination with any opioid painkiller, for the treatment of other conditions. |
In 2003, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or PTO, disclosed that a law firm for an unidentified third-party filed requests for an Ex Parte Reexamination related to certain claims on patents we exclusively licensed from Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Between 2004 and 2006, Reexamination Certificates were issued resolving the proceedings.
We may be involved in additional challenges to our intellectual property. An adverse outcome of any challenges to our intellectual property could result in loss of claims of these patents that pertain to certain drugs we currently have under development and could have a material adverse impact on our future revenues.
Strategic Alliance with King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
In November 2005, we entered into a collaboration agreement and a license agreement with King to develop and commercialize Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers. King made an upfront cash payment of $150 million to us at the closing of this strategic alliance in December 2005. King is also obligated to pay us up to $150 million in payments based on the achievement of milestones in the course of clinical development of Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers under the strategic alliance. In addition, subject to certain limitations, King is obligated to fund development expenses incurred by us related to Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers pursuant to the collaboration agreement. King is obligated to fund the commercialization expenses of, and has the exclusive right to market and sell, drugs developed in connection with the strategic alliance.
6
Table of Contents
We formed a joint operating committee, or JOC, with King to oversee drug development and commercialization strategies for the strategic alliance. Pursuant to the collaboration agreement in the strategic alliance, we retain sole control of drug development activities in the United States through Phase II clinical trials. We and King will jointly manage Phase III clinical trials and NDA submissions in the United States. King has responsibility for these development activities outside the United States. Upon regulatory approval, King will assume sole control and worldwide responsibility to exclusively commercialize Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid drugs developed pursuant to the strategic alliance. We retain all development and commercial rights in Australia and New Zealand.
Pursuant to the license agreement, King has the exclusive right to market and sell drugs developed pursuant to the strategic alliance and is obligated to pay us a 20% royalty on net sales, except as to the first $1 billion in cumulative net sales, for which the royalty is set at 15%. King is also obligated to reimburse us for our payment of third-party royalty obligations related to this strategic alliance.
The collaboration agreement continues until the later of the expiration of any patent rights licensed under the license agreement or developed under the collaboration agreement and the expiration of all periods of market exclusivity with respect to Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid drug candidates being developed under the strategic alliance. We and King can terminate the collaboration agreement under certain circumstances, including material breach and insolvency. King can terminate the collaboration agreement six months after the third anniversary of the effective date of the collaboration agreement, or sooner if the JOC determines that the development program under the collaboration agreement is unlikely to generate any marketable products. Our license agreement with King terminates at the time that the collaboration agreement terminates.
Formulation Agreement
We have an exclusive, worldwide licensing agreement with Durect Corporation to use a patented technology that forms the basis for a number of oral gel-cap drug candidates, including Remoxy. We have sub-licensed to King certain rights to develop and to commercialize Remoxy and certain other opioid drugs formulated in part with technology we licensed from Durect. Under the agreement with Durect, we control all of the preclinical, clinical, commercial manufacturing and sales/marketing activities for Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers. We reimburse Durect for formulation and related work, and will make milestone payments based on the achievement of certain technical, clinical or regulatory milestones. Durect will supply us with certain components of Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers on a cost-plus basis. We also are obligated to pay Durect royalties on any related drug sales.
King is obligated to reimburse us for costs we incur under the agreement with Durect, including royalties. Under our license agreement with King, we are obligated not to amend or terminate our agreement with Durect if an amendment or termination would alter the rights or obligations of King under the collaboration agreement or license agreement.
Manufacturing
We have no manufacturing facilities. We have entered into agreements with and rely upon qualified third parties for the formulation or manufacture of our clinical supplies. These supplies and the manufacturing facilities must comply with DEA regulations and current good manufacturing practices, or GMPs, enforced by the FDA and other government agencies. We plan to manufacture Remoxy with Mallinckrodt Pharmaceutical Outsourcing, a unit of Tyco Healthcare. Remoxy uses bulk oxycodone supplied by Noramco, Inc. We plan to continue to outsource formulation, manufacturing and related activities.
In 2006, we plan to continue to develop formulations of Remoxy and manufacture Remoxy to complete our Phase III clinical trial program. We also plan to develop abuse resistant formulations of other opioid drug candidates. We rely on a limited number of third-party manufacturers to formulate, manufacture, fill, label, ship or store all of our drug candidates.
7
Table of Contents
Government Regulation
Regulation by governmental authorities in the United States and other countries is a significant factor in the manufacture and marketing of pharmaceuticals and in our ongoing research and development activities. All of our products will require regulatory approval by governmental agencies prior to commercialization. In particular, human therapeutic products are subject to rigorous preclinical testing and clinical trials and other pre-marketing approval requirements by the FDA and regulatory authorities in other countries. In the United States, various federal, and in some cases state, statutes and regulations also govern or impact upon the manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage, record keeping and marketing of our products. The lengthy process of seeking required approvals and the continuing need for compliance with applicable statutes and regulations require us to spend substantial resources. Regulatory approval, when and if obtained, may be limited in scope which may significantly limit the indicated uses for which our products may be marketed. Further, approved drugs, as well as their manufacturers, are subject to ongoing review and discovery of previously unknown problems with such products that may result in restrictions on their manufacture, sale or use or in their withdrawal from the market.
Applicable FDA regulations require the filing of an NDA and approval by the FDA prior to commercialization of Remoxy or Oxytrex in the United States.
The Drug Approval Process
We will be required to complete several activities before we can market any of our drug candidates for human use in the United States, including possibly:
| preclinical studies; |
| submission to the FDA of an Investigational New Drug application, or IND, which must become effective before human clinical trials commence; |
| adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the drug candidate; |
| submission to the FDA of an NDA; and |
| FDA approval of the NDA prior to any commercial sale or shipment of the drug. |
Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluation of product chemistry and formulation, as well as animal studies to assess the potential safety of the product. Preclinical safety tests must be conducted by laboratories that comply with FDA regulations regarding Good Laboratory Practice. We submitted the results of preclinical tests to the FDA as part of our INDs prior to commencing clinical trials. We may be required to conduct additional toxicology studies concurrently with the clinical trials.
Based on preclinical testing, an IND is filed with the FDA to begin human testing of the drug in the United States. The IND becomes effective if not rejected by the FDA within 30 days. The IND must indicate the results of previous experiments, how, where and by whom the new clinical trials will be conducted, the chemical structure of the compound, the method by which it is believed to work in the human body, any toxic effects of the compound found in the animal studies and how the compound is manufactured. All clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice. In addition, an Institutional Review Board, or IRB, generally comprised of physicians at the hospital or clinic where the proposed clinical trials will be conducted, must review and approve the IND. The IRB also continues to monitor the clinical trial. We must submit progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials to the FDA at least annually. In addition, the FDA may, at any time during the 30-day period or at any time thereafter, impose a clinical hold on proposed or ongoing clinical trials. If the FDA imposes a clinical hold, clinical trials under the IND cannot commence or recommence without FDA authorization and then only under terms authorized by the FDA. An FDA imposed clinical hold on an IND application can result in substantial delay and large, unforeseen expenses, and it may cancel the viability of developing a new drug candidate in the United States.
8
Table of Contents
Clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap. Phase I clinical trials typically study a drugs safety profile, and may include the safe dosage range. Phase I clinical trials also determine how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized and excreted by the body, and the duration of its action. In addition, we may, to the extent feasible, assess early indicators of a drugs efficacy in our Phase I clinical trials. In Phase II clinical trials, controlled studies are conducted on volunteer patients with the targeted disease or condition. The primary purpose of these tests is to evaluate the effectiveness of the drug on the volunteer patients as well as to determine a drugs side effect profile. These clinical trials may be conducted concurrently with Phase I clinical trials. In addition, Phase I/II clinical trials may be conducted to evaluate not only the efficacy of the drug on the patient population, but also its safety. During Phase III clinical trials, the drug is studied in an expanded patient population and in multiple sites. Physicians monitor the patients to determine efficacy and to observe and report adverse events that may result from use of the drug.
Our clinical trials are designed to produce clinical information about how our drugs perform compared to placebo or compared to existing opioid drugs where appropriate. We have tested Oxytrex in several clinical settings of pain in order to support a broad approval by the FDA for use of the drug for the relief of moderate to severe pain. FDA guidelines recommend that we demonstrate Oxytrexs efficacy in more than one clinical presentation of pain, such as arthritis pain or generalized lower back pain. Because clinical models differ in their sensitivity to detect pain, we expect to complete clinical trials in multiple clinical models of pain.
We have designed most Phase II and Phase III clinical trials to date as randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled, dose-ranging studies. A randomized clinical trial is one in which patients are randomly assigned to the various study treatment arms. A double-blind clinical trial is one in which the patient, the physician and our trial monitor are unaware if the patient is receiving placebo or study drug in order to preserve the integrity of the clinical trial and reduce bias. A placebo-controlled clinical trial is one in which a subset of patients is purposefully given inactive medication.
The FDA publishes industry guidelines specifically for the clinical evaluation of painkillers. We rely in part on these guidelines to design a clinical strategy for the approval of each of our drug candidates. In particular, FDA guidelines recommend that we demonstrate efficacy of our new painkillers in more than one clinical model of pain. Acceptable clinical models of pain include low-back pain or arthritis pain. Upon a clear demonstration of the safety and efficacy of painkillers in multiple clinical models of pain, the FDA has historically approved painkillers with broad indications. Such general purpose labeling often takes the form of for the management of moderate to severe pain.
We may not successfully complete Phase I, Phase II or Phase III clinical trials within any specified time period, or at all, with respect to any of our drug candidates. Furthermore, we or the FDA may suspend clinical trials at any time in response to concerns that participants are exposed to an unacceptable health risk.
After the completion of clinical trials, if there is substantial evidence that the drug is safe and effective, an NDA is filed with the FDA. The NDA must contain all of the information on the drug gathered to that date, including data from the clinical trials. NDAs are often over 100,000 pages in length.
The FDA reviews all NDAs submitted before it accepts them for filing and may request additional information rather than accepting a NDA for filing. In such an event, the NDA must be resubmitted with the additional information and, again, is subject to review before filing. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review of the NDA. Under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, the FDA has 365 days in which to review the NDA and respond to the applicant. The review process is typically extended for significant amounts of time by the FDA requests for additional information or clarification regarding information already provided in the submission. The FDA may refer the application to an appropriate advisory committee, typically a panel of clinicians, for review, evaluation and a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved. The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee. If the FDAs evaluations of the NDA and the manufacturing facilities are favorable, the FDA may issue either an approval letter, or an
9
Table of Contents
approvable letter which usually contains a number of conditions that must be met in order to secure final approval of the NDA. When and if those conditions have been met to the FDAs satisfaction, the FDA will issue an approval letter, authorizing commercial marketing of the drug for certain indications. If the FDAs evaluation of the NDA submission or manufacturing facilities is not favorable, the FDA may refuse to approve the NDA or issue a not approvable letter.
If the FDA approves the NDA, the drug becomes available for physicians to prescribe. Periodic reports must be submitted to the FDA, including descriptions of any adverse reactions reported. The FDA may request additional post marketing studies, or Phase IV clinical trials, to evaluate long-term effects of the approved drug.
Other Regulatory Requirements
The FDA mandates that drugs be manufactured in conformity with current GMPs. If the FDA approves any of our drug candidates we will be subject to requirements for labeling, advertising, record keeping and adverse experience reporting. Failure to comply with these requirements could result, among other things, in suspension of regulatory approval, recalls, injunctions or civil or criminal sanctions. We may also be subject to regulations under other federal, state, and local laws, including the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Environmental Protection Act, the Clean Air Act, national restrictions on technology transfer, and import, export, and customs regulations. In addition, any of our products that contain narcotics will be subject to DEA regulations relating to manufacturing, storage, distribution and physician prescribing procedures. It is possible that any portion of the regulatory framework under which we operate may change and that such change could have a negative impact on our current and anticipated operations.
The Controlled Substances Act imposes various registration, record-keeping and reporting requirements, procurement and manufacturing quotas, labeling and packaging requirements, security controls and a restriction on prescription refills on certain pharmaceutical products. A principal factor in determining the particular requirements, if any, applicable to a product is its actual or potential abuse profile. The DEA regulates chemical compounds as Schedule I, II, III, IV or V substances, with Schedule I substances considered to present the highest risk of substance abuse and Schedule V substances the lowest risk. Any of our drug candidates that contain a scheduled substance will be subject to regulation by the DEA.
Competition
Our success will depend, in part, upon our ability to achieve market share at the expense of existing and established and future products in the relevant target markets. Existing and future products, therapies, technological approaches or delivery systems will compete directly with our products. Competing products may provide greater therapeutic benefits for a specific indication, or may offer comparable performance at a lower cost. Companies that currently sell generic or proprietary opioid formulations include but are not limited to Roxane Laboratories, Purdue Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Abbott Laboratories, Cephalon, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Elkins-Sinn, Watson Laboratories, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical and Forest Pharmaceuticals. Alternative technologies are being developed to increase opioid potency, as well as alternatives to opioid therapy for pain management, several of which are in clinical trials or are awaiting approval from the FDA.
We compete with fully integrated pharmaceutical companies, smaller companies that are collaborating with larger pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations. Many of these competitors have opioid drugs already approved by the FDA or in development and operate larger research and development programs in these fields than we do. In addition, many of these competitors, either alone or together with their collaborative partners, have substantially greater financial resources than we do, as well as significantly greater experience in:
| developing drugs; |
| undertaking preclinical testing and human clinical trials; |
10
Table of Contents
| obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals of drugs; |
| formulating and manufacturing drugs; and |
| launching, marketing, distributing and selling drugs. |
Developments by competitors may render our drug candidates or technologies obsolete or non-competitive.
Employees
As of December 31, 2005, we had approximately 37 employees. We engage consultants from time to time to perform services on a per diem or hourly basis.
Available Information
We file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, our Annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The public may read or copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.
You may obtain a free copy of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports on the day of filing with the SEC on our website on the World Wide Web at http://www.paintrials.com, by contacting the Investor Relations Department at our corporate offices by calling 650-624-8200 or by sending an e-mail message to cwaarich@paintrials.com.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
Our future operating results may vary substantially from anticipated results due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. The following discussion highlights some of these factors and the possible impact of these factors on future results of operations. You should carefully consider these factors before making an investment decision. If any of the following factors actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be harmed. In that case, the price of our common stock could decline, and you could experience losses on your investment.
Risks Relating to our Financial Position and Need for Financing
Our operating history may make it difficult for you to evaluate our business to date and to assess its future viability.
We were founded in May 1998. Our operations to date have been limited to organizing and staffing our company, acquiring, developing and securing our technology and undertaking preclinical studies and clinical trials of our drug candidates. We have not yet demonstrated our ability to obtain regulatory approval, formulate and manufacture our drug candidates on a commercial scale or conduct sales and marketing activities. Consequently, any predictions you make about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history.
We have a history of losses and expect to incur substantial losses and negative operating cash flows for the foreseeable future.
We have incurred net losses each year since our inception. As a result of ongoing operating losses, we had an accumulated deficit of $142.7 million as of December 31, 2005. Even if we succeed in developing and
11
Table of Contents
commercializing one or more of our drug candidates, we expect to continue to use significant cash resources in our operations for the foreseeable future. We recognized positive cash flow from operations in 2005 as a result of the upfront payment from King. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially in the foreseeable future as we:
| continue to conduct preclinical and clinical trials for our drug candidates; |
| seek regulatory approvals for our drug candidates; |
| develop, formulate, manufacture and commercialize our drug candidates; |
| implement additional internal systems and develop new infrastructure; |
| acquire or in-license additional products or technologies, or expand the use of our technology; |
| maintain, defend and expand the scope of our intellectual property; and |
| hire additional personnel. |
We will need to generate significant revenues to achieve and maintain profitability. If we cannot successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize our drug candidates, we will not be able to generate such revenues or achieve profitability in the future. Our failure to achieve or maintain profitability would have a material adverse impact on the market price of our common stock.
If we cannot raise additional capital on acceptable terms, we may be unable to complete planned clinical trials of any or some of our drug candidates or to pursue attractive business opportunities.
We have funded all of our operations and capital expenditures with the proceeds from our public and private stock offerings. We expect that our current cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities on hand will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs for at least the next twelve months. However, we may need to raise additional funds within such twelve-month period or thereafter and additional financing may not be available on favorable terms, if at all. Even if we succeed in selling additional securities to raise funds, our existing stockholders ownership percentage would be reduced and new investors may demand rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing stockholders. If we raise additional capital through strategic alliance and license arrangements, we may have to trade our rights to our technology, intellectual property or drug candidates to others in such arrangements on terms that may not be favorable to us.
If we determine that we need to raise additional funds and we are not successful in doing so, we may be unable to complete the clinical development of some or all of our drug candidates or to seek or obtain FDA approval of our drug candidates. We then could be forced to discontinue product development, enter into a relationship with a strategic partner earlier than currently intended, reduce sales and marketing efforts or forego attractive business opportunities.
Clinical and Regulatory Risks
If we fail to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals, we will not be allowed to commercialize our drug candidates, and we will not generate product revenues.
Satisfaction of all regulatory requirements typically takes many years, is dependent upon the type, complexity and novelty of the drug candidate, and requires the expenditure of substantial resources for research and development and testing. Our research and clinical approaches may not lead to drugs that the FDA considers safe for humans and effective for indicated uses we are studying. The FDA may require us to conduct additional clinical testing, in which case we would have to expend additional time and resources and would likely delay the date of potentially receiving regulatory approval. In particular, the FDA may require additional toxicology studies for certain excipients used in Remoxy or any of our other drug candidates. The approval process may also
12
Table of Contents
be delayed by changes in government regulation, future legislation or administrative action or changes in FDA policy that occur prior to or during our regulatory review. Delays in obtaining regulatory approvals will:
| delay commercialization of, and product revenues from, our drug candidates; and |
| diminish the competitive advantages that we may have otherwise enjoyed, which would have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. |
Even if we comply with all FDA regulatory requirements, we may never obtain regulatory approval for any of our drug candidates. If we fail to obtain regulatory approval for any of our drug candidates we will have fewer saleable products, if any, and corresponding lower product revenues, if any. Even if we receive regulatory approval of our drug candidates, such approval may involve limitations on the indications and conditions of use or marketing claims we may make for our products. Further, later discovery of previously unknown problems or adverse events could result in additional regulatory restrictions, including withdrawal of products. The FDA may also require us to commit to perform lengthy Phase IV post-approval clinical trials, for which we would have to expend additional resources, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
In jurisdictions outside the United States, we must receive marketing authorizations from the appropriate regulatory authorities before we can commercialize our drugs. Regulatory approval processes outside the United States generally include all of the aforementioned requirements and risks associated with FDA approval.
If we are unable to design, conduct and complete clinical trials successfully, we will not be able to obtain regulatory approval for our drug candidates.
In order to obtain FDA approval for any of our drug candidates, we must submit to the FDA an NDA that demonstrates that the drug candidate is safe and effective in humans for its intended use. This demonstration requires significant research and animal tests, which are referred to as preclinical studies, as well as human tests, which are referred to as clinical trials.
Our Phase III clinical trials may not demonstrate the safety or efficacy of our drug candidates. Success in preclinical testing and early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful. Results of later clinical trials may not replicate the results of prior clinical trials and preclinical testing. FDA guidelines recommend that the efficacy of new painkillers be demonstrated in more than one clinical model of pain. This means that even if one of our Phase III clinical trials demonstrates positive results for our drug candidates, we are likely to have to demonstrate positive results in one or more additional Phase III clinical trials prior to receiving broad label FDA approval for treatment of severe chronic pain. Even if the results of our Phase III clinical trials are positive, we may have to commit substantial time and additional resources to conducting further preclinical studies and clinical trials before we can submit NDAs or obtain FDA approvals for our drug candidates.
Clinical trials are very expensive and difficult to design and implement, in part because they are subject to rigorous requirements. The clinical trial process is also time consuming. Furthermore, if participating patients in clinical trials suffer drug-related adverse reactions during the course of such clinical trials, or if we or the FDA believe that participating patients are being exposed to unacceptable health risks, we will have to suspend or terminate our clinical trials. Failure can occur at any stage of the clinical trials, and we could encounter problems that cause us to abandon or repeat clinical trials.
In addition, completion of clinical trials can be delayed by numerous factors, including:
| delays in identifying and agreeing on acceptable terms with prospective clinical trial sites; |
| slower than expected rates of patient recruitment and enrollment; |
| increases in time required to complete monitoring of patients during or after participation in a clinical trial; and |
| unexpected need for additional patient-related data. |
13
Table of Contents
Any of these delays, if significant, could impact the timing, approval and commercialization of our drug candidates and could significantly increase our overall costs of drug development.
Even if our clinical trials are completed as planned, their results may not support our expectations or intended marketing claims. The clinical trials process may fail to demonstrate that our drug candidates are safe and effective for indicated uses. Such failure would cause us to abandon a drug candidate and could delay development of other drug candidates.
Clinical trial designs that were discussed with authorities prior to their commencement may subsequently be considered insufficient for approval at the time of application for regulatory approval.
We discuss with and obtain guidance from regulatory authorities on certain of our clinical development activities. These discussions are not binding obligations on the part of regulatory authorities. Regulatory authorities may revise previous guidance or decide to ignore previous guidance at any time during the course of our clinical activities or after the completion of our clinical trials. Even with successful clinical safety and efficacy data, we may be required to conduct additional, expensive clinical trials to obtain regulatory approval.
Developments by competitors may establish standards of care that affect our ability to conduct our clinical trials as planned.
We have conducted clinical trials of our drug candidates comparing our drug candidates to both placebo and other approved drugs. Changes in standards related to clinical trial design could affect our ability to design and conduct clinical trials as planned. For example, regulatory authorities may not allow us to compare our drug candidates to placebo in a particular clinical indication where approved products are available. In that case, both the cost and the amount of time required to conduct a clinical trial could increase.
The Drug Enforcement Administration, or DEA, limits the availability of the active ingredients in certain of our current drug candidates and, as a result, our quota may not be sufficient to complete clinical trials, or to meet commercial demand or may result in clinical delays.
The DEA regulates chemical compounds as Schedule I, II, III, IV or V substances, with Schedule I substances considered to present the highest risk of substance abuse and Schedule V substances the lowest risk. Certain active ingredients in our current drug candidates, such as oxycodone, are listed by the DEA as Schedule II under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. Consequently, their manufacture, research, shipment, storage, sale and use are subject to a high degree of oversight and regulation. For example, all Schedule II drug prescriptions must be signed by a physician, physically presented to a pharmacist and may not be refilled without a new prescription. Furthermore, the amount of Schedule II substances we can obtain for clinical trials and commercial distribution is limited by the DEA and our quota may not be sufficient to complete clinical trials or meet commercial demand. There is a risk that DEA regulations may interfere with the supply of the drugs used in our clinical trials, and, in the future, our ability to produce and distribute our products in the volume needed to meet commercial demand.
Government agencies may establish and promulgate usage guidelines that directly apply to our drug candidates.
Government agencies, professional and medical societies, and other groups may establish usage guidelines that apply to our drug candidates. These guidelines could address such matters as usage and dose, among other factors. Application of such guidelines could limit the use of our drug candidates.
14
Table of Contents
Conducting clinical trials of our drug candidates or potential commercial sales of a drug candidate may expose us to expensive product liability claims and we may not be able to maintain product liability insurance on reasonable terms or at all.
The risk of product liability is inherent in the testing of pharmaceutical products. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit or terminate testing of one or more of our products. Our inability to obtain sufficient product liability insurance at an acceptable cost to protect against potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit the commercialization of our products. We currently carry clinical trial insurance but do not carry product liability insurance. If we successfully commercialize one or more of our drug candidates, we may face product liability claims, regardless of FDA approval for commercial manufacturing and sale. We may not be able to obtain such insurance at a reasonable cost, if at all. If our agreements with any future corporate collaborators entitle us to indemnification against product liability losses, such indemnification may not be available or adequate should any claim arise.
If we receive regulatory approval for our drug candidates, we and our collaborators will also be subject to ongoing FDA obligations and continued regulatory review, such as continued safety reporting requirements, and we and our collaborators may also be subject to additional FDA post-marketing obligations or new regulations, all of which may result in significant expense and limit our ability to commercialize our potential drugs.
Any regulatory approvals that we receive for our drug candidates may also be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which the drug may be marketed or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing follow-up studies. In addition, if the FDA approves any of our drug candidates, the labeling, packaging, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion and record keeping for the drug will be subject to extensive regulatory requirements. The subsequent discovery of previously unknown problems with the drug, including but not limited to adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or the discovery that adverse events previously observed in preclinical research or clinical trials that were believed to be minor actually constitute much more serious problems, may result in restrictions on the marketing of the drug, and could include withdrawal of the drug from the market.
The FDAs policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent or delay regulatory approval of our drug candidates. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may be subject to fines, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecution. Any of these events could prevent us from marketing our drugs and our business could suffer.
Risks Relating to our Collaboration Agreements
If King or other outside collaborators fail to devote sufficient time and resources to our drug development programs, or if their performance is substandard, our regulatory submissions and our product introductions may be delayed.
Pursuant to our strategic alliance, we will jointly manage Phase III clinical trials and NDA submissions in the United States for Remoxy and other abuse resistant drug candidates with King. We rely on King to devote time and resources to the development and commercialization of Remoxy and other abuse resistant drug candidates. If King limits their time and resources attributable to the strategic alliance, or otherwise fails to perform as we expect, we may not achieve clinical and regulatory milestones and regulatory submissions and related product introductions may be delayed or prevented, and revenues that we would receive from these activities will be less than expected.
15
Table of Contents
We depend on independent investigators and collaborators, such as universities and medical institutions, to conduct our clinical trials under agreements with us. These collaborators are not our employees and we cannot control the amount or timing of resources that they devote to our programs. These investigators may not assign as great a priority to our programs or pursue them as diligently as we would if we were undertaking such programs ourselves. If outside collaborators fail to devote sufficient time and resources to our drug development programs, or if their performance is substandard, the approval of our regulatory submissions and our introductions of new drugs will be delayed or prevented.
Our collaborators may also have relationships with other commercial entities, some of which may compete with us. If outside collaborators assist our competitors to our detriment, the approval of our regulatory submissions will be delayed and the sales from our products, if any are commercialized, will be less than expected.
If we fail to maintain our strategic alliance for Remoxy and other abuse resistant drugs, we may have to reduce or delay our drug candidate development.
Our plan for developing, manufacturing and commercializing Remoxy and other abuse resistant drugs currently requires us to successfully maintain our strategic alliance with King to advance our programs and provide funding to support our expenditures on Remoxy and other drug candidates. If we are not able to maintain our existing strategic alliance with King, we may have to limit the size or scope of, or delay or abandon the development of Remoxy and other abuse resistant drug candidates or undertake and fund development of these drug candidates ourselves. If we elect to fund drug development efforts with respect to Remoxy and other abuse resistant drug candidates on our own, we may need to obtain additional capital, which may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all.
We may not succeed at in-licensing drug candidates or technologies to expand our product pipeline.
We may not successfully in-license drug candidates or technologies to expand our product pipeline. The number of such candidates or technologies is limited. Competition among large pharmaceutical companies and biopharmaceutical companies for promising drug candidates or technologies is intense because such companies generally desire to expand their product pipelines through in-licensing.
Our collaborative agreements may not succeed or may give rise to disputes over intellectual property or other issues.
Our strategy to focus on development of novel drug candidates discovered by third parties requires us to enter into license agreements with such third parties. In addition, we may enter into collaborative agreements to commercialize our products, such as our strategic alliance with King. Such agreements are generally complex and contain provisions that could give rise to legal disputes, including potential disputes concerning ownership of intellectual property under collaborations. Such disputes can delay or prevent the development of potential new drug products, or can lead to lengthy, expensive litigation or arbitration. Other factors relating to collaborative agreements may adversely affect the success of our drug candidates, including:
| the development of parallel products by our collaborators or by a competitor; |
| arrangements with collaborative partners that limit or preclude us from developing certain products or technologies; |
| premature termination of a collaborative agreement; or |
| failure by a collaborative partner to devote sufficient resources to the development of our potential products. |
16
Table of Contents
Risks Relating to Commercialization
If physicians and patients do not accept and use our drugs, we will not achieve sufficient product revenues and our business will suffer.
Even if the FDA approves our drugs, physicians and patients may not accept and use them. Acceptance and use of our drugs will depend on a number of factors including:
| perceptions by members of the healthcare community, including physicians, about the safety and effectiveness of our drugs; |
| published studies demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of our drugs relative to competing products; |
| availability of reimbursement for our products from government or healthcare payers; |
| our ability to implement a risk management plan prior to the distribution of any Schedule II drug; and |
| effectiveness of marketing and distribution efforts by us and our licensees and distributors. |
Because we expect to rely on sales generated by our current lead drug candidates for substantially all of our revenues for the foreseeable future, the failure of any of these drugs to find market acceptance would harm our business and could require us to seek additional financing.
If King is not successful in commercializing Remoxy and other abuse resistant drugs, our revenues and our business will suffer.
Our ability to commercialize Remoxy and other abuse resistant drugs and generate royalties from product sales of such drugs will depend on Kings abilities in assisting us in developing such drugs and in maintaining regulatory approval and achieving market acceptance of such drugs once commercialized. King may elect to independently develop drugs that could compete with ours or fail to commit sufficient resources to the development, marketing and distribution of Remoxy and other abuse resistant drugs developed under our strategic alliance. King may not proceed with the commercialization of Remoxy and other abuse resistant drugs developed under our strategic alliance with the same degree of urgency as we would because of other priorities they face. If King is not successful in commercializing Remoxy for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to competition from other pharmaceutical companies, or if King fails to perform as we expect, our potential for revenue from drugs developed in connection with our strategic alliance with King, if any, could be dramatically reduced and our business would suffer.
If we are unable to develop our own sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, or if we are not successful in contracting with third parties for these services on favorable terms, or at all, our product revenues could be disappointing.
We currently have no sales, marketing or distribution capabilities. Except with regard to products developed under our strategic alliance with King, in order to commercialize our products, if any are approved by the FDA, we will either have to develop such capabilities internally or collaborate with third parties who can perform these services for us. If we decide to commercialize any of our drugs ourselves, we may not be able to hire the necessary experienced personnel and build sales, marketing and distribution operations which are capable of successfully launching new drugs and generating sufficient product revenues. In addition, establishing such operations will take time and involve significant expense.
If we decide to enter into new co-promotion or other licensing arrangements with third parties, we may be unable to locate acceptable collaborators because the number of potential collaborators is limited and because of competition from others for similar alliances with potential collaborators. Even if we are able to identify one or more acceptable new collaborators, we may not be able to enter into any collaborative arrangements on favorable terms, or at all.
17
Table of Contents
In addition, due to the nature of the market for pain management products, it may be necessary for us to license all or substantially all of our drug candidates not covered by our strategic alliance with King to a single collaborator, thereby eliminating our opportunity to commercialize these other pain management products independently. If we enter into any such new collaborative arrangements, our revenues are likely to be lower than if we marketed and sold our products ourselves.
In addition, any revenues we receive would depend upon our collaborators efforts which may not be adequate due to lack of attention or resource commitments, management turnover, change of strategic focus, further business combinations or other factors outside of our control. Depending upon the terms of our collaboration, the remedies we have against an under-performing collaborator may be limited. If we were to terminate the relationship, it may be difficult or impossible to find a replacement collaborator on acceptable terms, or at all.
If we cannot compete successfully for market share against other drug companies, we may not achieve sufficient product revenues and our business will suffer.
The market for our drug candidates is characterized by intense competition and rapid technological advances. If our drug candidates receive FDA approval, they will compete with a number of existing and future drugs and therapies developed, manufactured and marketed by others. Existing or future competing products may provide greater therapeutic convenience or clinical or other benefits for a specific indication than our products, or may offer comparable performance at a lower cost. If our products are unable to capture and maintain market share, we may not achieve sufficient product revenues and our business will suffer.
We will compete for market share against fully integrated pharmaceutical companies or other companies that are collaborating with larger pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations. Many of these competitors have opioid painkillers already approved or in development. In addition, many of these competitors, either alone or together with their collaborative partners, operate larger research and development programs and have substantially greater financial resources than we do, as well as significantly greater experience in:
| developing drugs; |
| conducting preclinical testing and human clinical trials; |
| obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals of drugs; |
| formulating and manufacturing drugs; and |
| launching, marketing, distributing and selling drugs. |
Our ability to generate product revenues will be diminished if we fail to obtain acceptable prices or an adequate level of reimbursement for our products from healthcare payers.
Our ability to commercialize our drugs, alone or with collaborators, will depend in part on the extent to which reimbursement will be available from:
| government and health administration authorities; |
| private health maintenance organizations and health insurers; and |
| other healthcare payers. |
Significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly approved healthcare products. Healthcare payers, including Medicare, health maintenance organizations and managed care organizations, are challenging the prices charged for medical products and services and/or are seeking pharmacoeconomic data to justify formulary acceptance and reimbursement practices. We currently have not generated pharmacoeconomic
18
Table of Contents
data on any of our products. Government and other healthcare payers increasingly are attempting to contain healthcare costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement for drugs, and by refusing, in some cases, to provide coverage for uses of approved products for disease indications for which the FDA has or has not granted labeling approval. Adequate third-party insurance coverage may not be available to patients for any products we discover and develop, alone or with collaborators. If government and other healthcare payers do not provide adequate coverage and reimbursement levels for our products, market acceptance of our product candidates could be limited.
Risks Relating to our Intellectual Property
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property our competitors could develop and market products with similar features that may reduce demand for our products.
Our success, competitive position and potential future revenues will depend in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property. If we, Albert Einstein College of Medicine or our other collaborators fail to file, prosecute or maintain certain patents, our competitors could market products that contain features and clinical benefits similar to those of our products, and demand for our products could decline as a result.
We may be involved in additional challenges to our intellectual property. An adverse outcome of a challenge to our intellectual property could result in loss of claims of patents or other intellectual property rights that pertain to certain drugs we currently have under development and could have a material adverse impact on our future revenues.
We intend to file additional patent applications relating to our technology, products and processes. We may direct Albert Einstein College of Medicine or our collaborators to file additional patent applications relating to the licensed technology or we may do so ourselves. However, our competitors may challenge, invalidate or circumvent any of our current or future patents. These patents may also fail to provide us with meaningful competitive advantages.
We may become involved in expensive litigation or other legal proceedings related to our existing intellectual property rights, including patents.
We expect that we will rely upon patents, trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our competitive position. Others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information or be issued patents that may prevent the sale of our products or know-how or require us to license such information and pay significant fees or royalties in order to produce our products.
Our technology could infringe upon claims of patents owned by others. If we were found to be infringing on a patent held by another, we might have to seek a license to use the patented technology. In that case, we might not be able to obtain such a license on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If a legal action were to be brought against us or our licensors, we could incur substantial defense costs, and any such action might not be resolved in our favor. If such a dispute were to be resolved against us, we could have to pay the other party large sums of money and our use of our technology and the testing, manufacture, marketing or sale of one or more of our proposed products could be restricted or prohibited.
19
Table of Contents
Risks Relating to our Business and Strategy
Competition for qualified personnel in the pharmaceutical industry is intense, and if we are not successful in attracting and retaining qualified personnel, we could experience delays in completing necessary clinical trials, in the regulatory approval process or in formulating, manufacturing, marketing and selling our potential products.
We will need to hire additional qualified personnel with expertise in clinical research, preclinical testing, government regulation, formulation and manufacturing and sales and marketing. We compete for qualified individuals with numerous biopharmaceutical companies, universities and other research institutions. Competition for such individuals, particularly in the San Francisco Bay area, is intense, and our search for such personnel may not be successful. Attracting and retaining qualified personnel will be critical to our success.
If third-party manufacturers of our drug candidates fail to devote sufficient time and resources to our concerns, or if their performance is substandard, our clinical trials and product introductions may be delayed and our costs may be higher than expected.
We have no manufacturing facilities and have limited experience in drug product development and commercial manufacturing. We lack the resources and expertise to formulate, manufacture or test the technical performance of our drug candidates. We currently rely on a limited number of experienced personnel and a small number of contract manufacturers and other vendors to formulate, test, supply, store and distribute drug supplies for our clinical trials. Our reliance on a limited number of vendors exposes us to the following risks, any of which could delay our clinical trials, and, consequently, FDA approval of our drug candidates and commercialization of our products, result in higher costs, or deprive us of potential product revenues:
| Contract commercial manufacturers, their sub-contractors or other third parties we rely on, may encounter difficulties in achieving the volume of production needed to satisfy clinical needs or commercial demand, may experience technical issues that impact quality or compliance with applicable and strictly enforced regulations governing the manufacture of pharmaceutical products, and may experience shortages of qualified personnel to adequately staff production operations. |
| Our contract manufacturers could default on their agreements with us to provide clinical supplies or meet our requirements for commercialization of our products. |
| The use of alternate manufacturers may be difficult because the number of potential manufacturers that have the necessary governmental licenses to produce narcotic products is limited. Additionally, the FDA and the DEA must approve any alternative manufacturer of our products before we may use the alternative manufacturer to produce our supplies. |
| It may be difficult or impossible for us to find a replacement manufacturer on acceptable terms quickly, or at all. Our contract manufacturers and vendors may not perform as agreed or may not remain in the contract manufacturing business for the time required to successfully produce, store and distribute our products. |
| If any contract manufacturer makes improvements in the manufacturing process for our products, we may not own, or may have to share, the intellectual property rights to such innovation. |
Our employees and consultants are generally subject to confidentiality or other agreements with their former employers and they may inadvertently or otherwise violate those agreements.
Many of our employees and consultants were previously employed at universities or biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies. While we require our employees and consultants to honor any agreements they may have entered into prior to working with us, we may be subject to claims that we inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other confidential information belonging to former employers. Failure to defend such claims could result in loss of valuable rights or personnel, which in turn could harm or prevent commercialization
20
Table of Contents
of our drug candidates. Successful defense against such claims can be expensive and might distract us from executing our strategies.
Law enforcement concerns over diversion of opioids and social issues around abuse of opioids may make the regulatory approval process very difficult for our drug candidates.
Media stories regarding the diversion of opioids and other controlled substances are commonplace. Law enforcement agencies or regulatory agencies may apply policies that seek to limit the availability of opioids. Such efforts may adversely affect the regulatory approval process for our drug candidates.
Developments by competitors may render our products or technologies obsolete or non-competitive.
Alternative technologies and products are being developed to improve or replace the use of opioids for pain management, several of which are in clinical trials or are awaiting approval from the FDA. In addition, the active ingredients in nearly all opioid drugs are available in generic form. Drug companies that sell generic opioid drugs represent substantial competition. Many of these organizations competing with us have substantially greater capital resources, larger research and development staffs and facilities, greater experience in drug development and in obtaining regulatory approvals and greater manufacturing and marketing capabilities than we do. Our competitors may market less expensive or more effective drugs that would compete with our product candidates or reach market with competing drugs before we are able to reach market with our drug candidates. These organizations also compete with us to attract qualified personnel and partners for acquisitions, joint ventures or other collaborations.
Business interruptions could limit our ability to operate our business.
Our operations as well as those of our collaborators on which we depend are vulnerable to damage or interruption from computer viruses, human error, natural disasters, electrical and telecommunication failures, international acts of terror and similar events. We have not established a formal disaster recovery plan and our back-up operations and our business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for losses we may suffer. A significant business interruption could result in losses or damages incurred by us and require us to cease or curtail our operations.
Risks Relating to Manufacturing
We rely on third-party commercial drug manufacturers for drug supply.
Approved third-party commercial drug manufacturers may subsequently be stopped from producing, storing, shipping or testing our drug products due to their non-compliance with federal, state or local regulations. Drug manufacturers are subject to ongoing periodic unannounced inspection by the FDA, the DEA, and corresponding state and foreign government agencies to ensure strict compliance with good manufacturing practice and other government regulations and corresponding foreign standards. We do not have control over third-party manufacturers compliance with these regulations and standards.
In addition, even if we enter into long-term supply arrangements with third-party suppliers, we cannot control changes in strategy by third-party suppliers that affect their ability or willingness to continue to supply our drug products on acceptable terms.
If our drug supply for one of our drug candidates was interrupted, our operations could be negatively affected.
21
Table of Contents
If we cannot formulate and scale-up a wide range of dosage forms of Remoxy and other abuse resistant product candidates, we and King might determine that the commercial opportunity for Remoxy is too limited to warrant further investment in clinical testing and development.
We plan to formulate and scale-up a wide range of dosage forms of Remoxy and other abuse resistant drug candidates. We may not be able to successfully complete our formulation or scale-up activities or we may determine that the commercial opportunity for Remoxy and other abuse resistant drug candidates in certain dosage forms is too limited to warrant further investment. If we are unsuccessful in our formulation or scale-up activities with Remoxy and other abuse resistant drug candidates, our future revenue from milestones and royalties under our strategic alliance with King may be less than expected and our operations may suffer.
We rely on Durect, our sole source provider of certain components of Remoxy and other abuse resistant drug candidates, to produce Remoxy and other abuse resistant drug candidates for clinical supplies and will rely on Durect to produce commercial supplies of these components.
We rely on Durect as our sole source provider of certain components of Remoxy and other abuse resistant drug candidates, and will rely solely on Durect to produce commercial supplies of these components. Durects failure to achieve and maintain satisfactory manufacturing standards could result in product recalls or withdrawals, delays or failures in product testing or delivery, cost overruns or other problems that could materially harm our business. Durect may encounter manufacturing difficulties involving production yields, quality control and quality assurance. Durect is subject to ongoing periodic unannounced inspection by the FDA and corresponding state and foreign agencies to ensure strict compliance with cGMP and other government regulations and corresponding foreign standards. We cannot control Durects compliance with these regulations and standards.
To date, Durect has not produced commercial-scale supply of these components. If we and King receive marketing approval for and commercially launch Remoxy or other abuse resistant candidates, we anticipate that Durect will need to expand its manufacturing capacity, possibly materially. Durect may not be able to increase its manufacturing capacity for Remoxy and other abuse resistant drug candidates in a timely or economic manner, or at all. Moreover, significant scale up of manufacturing may require additional validation studies, which the FDA must review and approve. If Durect is unable to successfully increase the manufacturing capacity for such components of Remoxy and other abuse resistant drugs, at an acceptable cost or otherwise, and we are unable to establish alternative manufacturing capabilities, the commercial launch or continued commercialization after a commercial launch of Remoxy and other abuse resistant drugs may be delayed, prevented or impaired or there may be a shortage in supply, which would harm our revenues and cause our business to suffer.
Risks Relating to an Investment in our Common Stock
Our stock price has been volatile and could experience a sudden decline in value.
Our common stock has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations and may continue to experience volatility in the future. You may not be able to sell your shares quickly or at the latest market price if trading in our stock is not active or the volume is low. The following factors, in addition to other risk factors described in this section, may have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock:
| the success of our collaboration agreements; |
| results of or delays in our preclinical and clinical trials; |
| publicity regarding actual or potential medical results relating to products under development by us or others; |
| announcements of technological innovations or new commercial products by us or others; |
| developments in patent or other proprietary rights by us or others; |
22
Table of Contents
| comments or opinions by securities analysts or major stockholders; |
| future sales of our common stock by existing stockholders; |
| regulatory developments or changes in regulatory guidance; |
| litigation or threats of litigation; |
| economic and other external factors or other disaster or crises; |
| the departure of any of our officers, directors or key employees; |
| period-to-period fluctuations in financial results; and |
| limited daily trading volume. |
The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., or NASD, and the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, have adopted certain new rules. If we were unable to continue to comply with the new rules, we could be delisted from trading on the NASDAQ National Market, or Nasdaq, and thereafter trading in our common stock, if any, would be conducted through the over-the-counter market or on the Electronic Bulletin Board of the NASD. As a consequence of such delisting, an investor would likely find it more difficult to dispose of, or to obtain quotations as to the price of, our common stock. Delisting of our common stock could also result in lower prices per share of our common stock than would otherwise prevail.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents, our Stockholder Rights Plan and Delaware law may prevent or delay removal of incumbent management or a change of control.
Anti-takeover provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, our Stockholder Rights Plan and Delaware law may have the effect of deterring or delaying attempts by our stockholders to remove or replace management, engage in proxy contests and effect changes in control. The provisions of our charter documents include:
| a classified board so that only one of the three classes of directors on our board of directors is elected each year; |
| elimination of cumulative voting in the election of directors; |
| procedures for advance notification of stockholder nominations and proposals; |
| the ability of our board of directors to amend our bylaws without stockholder approval; and |
| the ability of our board of directors to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval upon the terms and conditions and with the rights, privileges and preferences as our board of directors may determine. |
The rights issued pursuant to our Stockholder Rights Plan will become exercisable, subject to certain exceptions, the tenth day after a person or group announces acquisition of 15% or more of our common stock or announces commencement of a tender or exchange offer the consummation of which would result in ownership by the person or group of 15% or more of our common stock.
In addition, as a Delaware corporation, we are subject to Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. In general, Section 203 prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three years following the date that the stockholder became an interested stockholder unless certain specific requirements are met as set forth in Section 203.
These provisions, alone or together, could have the effect of deterring or delaying changes in incumbent management, proxy contests or changes in control.
23
Table of Contents
Volatility in the stock prices of other companies may contribute to volatility in our stock price.
The stock market in general, Nasdaq and the market for technology companies in particular, have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. Further, there has been particular volatility in the market prices of securities of early stage life sciences companies. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a companys securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted. A securities class action suit against us could result in substantial costs, potential liabilities and the diversion of managements attention and resources.
Our share ownership is concentrated, and our officers, directors and principal stockholders can exert significant control over matters requiring stockholder approval.
Due to their combined stock holdings, our officers, directors and principal stockholders (stockholders holding greater than 5% of our common stock) acting collectively may have the ability to exercise significant influence over matters requiring stockholder approval including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. In addition, this concentration of ownership may delay or prevent a change in control of the Company and may make some transactions more difficult or impossible to complete without the support of these stockholders.
Publicly available information regarding stockholders ownership may not be comprehensive because the SEC does not require certain large stockholders to publicly disclose their stock ownership positions.
Our operating results may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and this fluctuation may cause our stock price to decline.
Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate in the future. Factors contributing to these fluctuations include, among other items, the timing and enrollment rates of clinical trials for our drug candidates, our need for clinical supplies and the valuation of stock-based compensation. Thus, quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not indicative of what we might expect in the future. As a result, in some future quarters our clinical, financial or operating results may not meet the expectations of securities analysts and investors that could result in a decline in the price of our stock.
There may not be an active, liquid trading market for our common stock.
There is no guarantee that an active trading market for our common stock will be maintained on Nasdaq. Investors may not be able to sell their shares quickly or at the latest market price if trading in our stock is not active.
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
Item 2. | Properties |
We currently lease approximately 10,500 square feet of space in South San Francisco, California, which is used as general office space. We believe that this facility is adequate and suitable for our current needs.
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings |
We are not a party to any legal proceedings.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the security holders during the fourth quarter of 2005.
24
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol PTIE. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market for the periods indicated.
Sale Price | ||||||
High |
Low | |||||
Fiscal 2005: |
||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 7.48 | $ | 4.99 | ||
Second Quarter |
$ | 7.24 | $ | 4.78 | ||
Third Quarter |
$ | 7.22 | $ | 5.79 | ||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 9.45 | $ | 5.46 | ||
Fiscal 2004: |
||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 9.86 | $ | 5.77 | ||
Second Quarter |
$ | 9.34 | $ | 6.54 | ||
Third Quarter |
$ | 8.39 | $ | 6.22 | ||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 8.13 | $ | 6.82 |
We currently expect to retain future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business and have not paid and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. As of February 1, 2006, there were approximately 75 holders of record of our common stock.
The following table summarizes the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2005.
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans | |||||
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders |
6,993,492 | $ | 6.74 | 1,420,802 | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders |
| | | ||||
Total |
6,993,492 | $ | 6.74 | 1,420,802 | |||
25
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data (in thousands except per share data) |
Years ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||||||||
Statement of operations data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Program fee revenue |
$ | 3,712 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Collaboration revenue |
1,368 | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
5,080 | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
32,938 | 35,093 | 18,913 | 11,396 | 11,668 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
4,859 | 3,868 | 3,338 | 5,523 | 5,647 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
37,797 | 38,961 | 22,251 | 16,919 | 17,315 | |||||||||||||||
Operating loss |
(32,717 | ) | (38,961 | ) | (22,251 | ) | (16,919 | ) | (17,315 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest and other income |
2,047 | 1,185 | 634 | 994 | 2,978 | |||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (30,670 | ) | $ | (37,776 | ) | $ | (21,617 | ) | $ | (15,925 | ) | $ | (14,337 | ) | |||||
Basic and diluted loss per share |
$ | (0.70 | ) | $ | (1.01 | ) | $ | (0.73 | ) | $ | (0.59 | ) | $ | (0.57 | ) | |||||
Weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted loss per share |
43,795 | 37,267 | 29,483 | 27,039 | 25,332 | |||||||||||||||
December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||||||||
Balance sheet data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 95,651 | $ | 1,379 | $ | 12,027 | $ | 50,091 | $ | 65,274 | ||||||||||
Marketable securities |
117,001 | 98,018 | 65,402 | 55 | | |||||||||||||||
Working capital |
181,817 | 91,860 | 74,799 | 48,146 | 63,195 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
215,795 | 101,192 | 80,513 | 53,325 | 68,136 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred program fee revenue |
146,288 | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
152,435 | 7,796 | 3,951 | 3,101 | 2,519 | |||||||||||||||
Total Stockholders equity |
63,360 | 93,396 | 76,562 | 50,224 | 65,616 |
26
Table of Contents
Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this report. Operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur in future periods.
Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the development of innovative drugs. We specialize in developing safer or more efficacious drugs for use in pain management, particularly in the area of opioid painkillers, which are sometimes referred to as narcotic painkillers. According to IMS Health, sales for opioid painkillers in the United States exceeded $6.0 billion in 2004. We incorporated in Delaware in May 1998.
Our clinical pipeline consists of proprietary drug candidates. We are currently developing two oral, small molecule drugs to treat patients who suffer from severe chronic pain, such as pain associated with advanced osteoarthritis and low-back pain.
Both of our novel drug candidates are currently in Phase III clinical trial programs:
| Remoxy, an abuse-resistant version of long-acting oxycodone, and |
| Oxytrex, a new oral opioid painkiller for the treatment of severe chronic pain. |
In November 2005, we and King announced a strategic alliance to develop and commercialize Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers. King made an upfront cash payment of $150 million to us at the closing of this strategic alliance in December 2005. We could also receive from King up to $150 million in milestone payments in the course of clinical development of Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers under the strategic alliance. In addition, subject to certain limitations, King is also obligated to pay us up to $150 million in payments based on the achievement of milestones in the course of clinical development of Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers under the strategic alliance. King is obligated to fund the commercialization expenses of, and has the exclusive right to market and sell, drugs developed in connection with the strategic alliance. King is obligated to pay us a 20% royalty on net sales of drugs developed in connection with the strategic alliance, except as to the first $1 billion in net sales of such drugs, for which the royalty is set at 15%.
We have yet to generate any revenues from product sales. We have not been profitable and through December 31, 2005, we have recorded an accumulated deficit of approximately $142.7 million. These losses have resulted principally from costs incurred in connection with research and development activities, salaries and other personnel-related costs and general corporate expenses. Research and development activities include costs of preclinical and clinical trials as well as clinical supplies associated with our drug candidates. Salaries and other personnel-related costs include non-cash stock-based compensation associated with options granted to employees and non-employees. Our operating results may fluctuate substantially from period to period as a result of the timing and enrollment rates of clinical trials for our drug candidates and our need for clinical supplies.
We expect to continue to use significant cash resources in our operations for the next several years. Our cash requirements for operating activities and capital expenditures will increase substantially in the future as we:
| continue to conduct preclinical and clinical trials for our drug candidates; |
| seek regulatory approvals for our drug candidates; |
| develop, formulate, manufacture and commercialize our drug candidates; |
| implement additional internal systems and develop new infrastructure; |
| acquire or in-license additional products or technologies, or expand the use of our technology; |
| maintain, defend and expand the scope of our intellectual property; and |
| hire additional personnel. |
27
Table of Contents
Product revenue will depend on our ability to receive regulatory approvals for, and successfully market, our drug candidates. If our development efforts result in regulatory approval and successful commercialization of our drug candidates, we will generate revenue from direct sales of our drugs and/or, if we license our drugs to future collaborators, from the receipt of license fees and royalties from sales of licensed products. We conduct our research and development programs through a combination of internal and collaborative programs. We rely on arrangements with universities, our collaborators, contract research organizations and clinical research sites for a significant portion of our product development efforts.
We focus all our research and development efforts on the research and development of opioid drugs for the treatment of pain. The following table summarizes expenses by category for research and development efforts (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
2003 | |||||||
Compensation |
$ | 4,717 | $ | 3,769 | $ | 3,690 | |||
Contractor fees (1) |
23,642 | 26,605 | 10,049 | ||||||
Supplies (2) |
2,351 | 2,575 | 3,262 | ||||||
Other (3) |
2,228 | 2,144 | 1,912 | ||||||
$ | 32,938 | $ | 35,093 | $ | 18,913 | ||||
(1) | Contractor fees generally include expenses for preclinical studies and clinical trials. |
(2) | Supplies generally include costs for formulation and manufacturing activities. |
(3) | Other generally includes the allocation of common costs such as facilities. |
Our technology has been applied across our portfolio of drug candidates. Data, know-how, personnel, clinical results, research results and other matters related to the research and development of any one of our drug candidates also relate to, and further the development of, our other drug candidates. As a result, costs allocated to a specific drug candidate may not necessarily reflect the actual costs surrounding research and development of that drug candidate due to cross application of the foregoing.
Estimating the dates of completion of clinical development, and the costs to complete development, of our drug candidates would be highly speculative, subjective and potentially misleading. Pharmaceutical products take a significant amount of time to research, develop and commercialize. The clinical trial portion of the development of a new drug alone usually spans several years. We expect to reassess our future research and development plans based on our review of data we receive from our current research and development activities. The cost and pace of our future research and development activities are linked and subject to change.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and interest income in our financial statements and accompanying notes. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including those estimates related to contract agreements, research collaborations and investments. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following items in our financial statements require significant estimates and judgments:
| Expenses for clinical trials. Expenses for clinical trials are incurred from planning through patient enrollment to reporting of the underlying data. We estimate expenses incurred for clinical trials that are in process based on patient enrollment and based on clinical data collection and management. Costs that |
28
Table of Contents
are associated with patient enrollment are recognized as each patient in the clinical trial completes enrollment. Costs that are based on clinical data collection and management are recognized based on estimates of unbilled goods and services received. In the event of early termination of a clinical trial, we would accrue an amount based on estimates of the remaining non-cancelable obligations associated with winding down the clinical trial. |
| Stock based compensation. The preparation of the financial statement footnotes requires us to estimate the fair value of stock options granted to employees. While fair value may be readily determinable for awards of stock, market quotes are not available for long-term, nontransferable stock options because these instruments are not traded. We currently use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, or Black-Scholes to estimate the fair value of employee stock options. However, Black-Scholes was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including but not limited to stock price volatility. Because our stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, changes to the assumptions used in Black-Scholes may materially affect the fair value estimate. After evaluating our option valuation policies and assumptions in light of current accounting standards related to employee stock options, we expect to continue to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for determining the fair value of our options. |
| Revenue recognition. In connection with our strategic alliance with King, we recognize program fee revenue and collaboration revenue. Program fee revenue is derived from the upfront payment from King and is recognized ratably over our estimate of the development period under the strategic alliance with King. Collaboration revenues from reimbursement of development expenses are recognized as costs are incurred that relate to the strategic alliance with King. |
| Taxes. We make estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense. We have accumulated significant deferred tax assets. Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of net operating loss and tax credit carryovers and temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon future earnings, if any. We are uncertain of the timing and amount of any future earnings. Accordingly, we fully offset the total deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance. We may in the future determine that some, or all, of our deferred tax assets will likely be realized, in which case we will reduce our valuation allowance in the quarter in which such determination is made. If the valuation allowance is reduced, we may recognize a benefit from income taxes in our statement of operations in that period. |
Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
RevenuesProgram fee revenue
King paid us a $150.0 million upfront fee in connection with the closing of our strategic alliance with King in December 2005. Revenues recognized from amortization of the upfront fee were $3.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2005 for recognition of the revenue for the period from the execution of the agreement in November 2005 to the end of 2005. We expect to recognize the remainder of the program fee ratably over our estimate of the development period under the strategic alliance with King.
RevenuesCollaboration revenue
Collaboration revenues were $1.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2005, related to reimbursement of our development expenses incurred pursuant to the King strategic alliance from the execution of the agreement in November 2005 to the end of 2005. We did not have any corresponding collaboration revenue in 2004.
29
Table of Contents
We expect collaboration revenues to increase significantly in 2006 and beyond as compared to revenue recognized in 2005 in connection with future increases in our research and development activities for Remoxy and other abuse-resistant drug candidates and reimbursement of these expenses pursuant to the King Agreement.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense consists primarily of costs of drug development work associated with our drug candidates, including:
| preclinical testing, |
| clinical trials, |
| clinical supplies and related formulation and design costs, and |
| salaries and other personnel-related expenses. |
Research and development expense decreased to $32.9 million from $35.1 million in the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to lower clinical trial activity in 2005 as compared to 2004. This decrease was offset in part by increased formulation and development activities for Remoxy and other preclinical activities as well as increased compensation related expenses.
We expect research and development expenses to increase over the next several years as we expand our development efforts. We expect our development efforts to result in our drug candidates progressing through various stages of clinical trials, including our Phase III clinical trials of Oxytrex, Remoxy, and other abuse resistant drug candidates. King is obligated to reimburse development expenses for Remoxy and other abuse resistant drug candidates pursuant to our agreement. Also, we expect to continue other development efforts on our drug candidates. The increase in research and development expenses may fluctuate from period to period due to the timing and scope of our development activities and the results of clinical trials and preclinical studies.
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense consists primarily of compensation and other general corporate expenses. General and administrative expense increased to $4.9 million from $3.9 million in the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, primarily due to increases in headcount and general corporate activities, offset in part by decreased non-cash stock-based compensation expense in 2005 as compared to 2004. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase over the next several years in connection with precommercialization and commercialization activities for our product candidates. The increase may fluctuate from period to period due to the timing and scope of these activities and the results of clinical trials and preclinical studies.
Interest and Other Income
Interest and other income increased to $2.0 million from $1.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, primarily due to increases in yields on our investments in marketable securities and, to a lesser extent, in average balances of marketable securities. We expect our interest income to increase during 2006 because we expect our average balance of our marketable securities to be higher in 2006 as compared to 2005 and we expect the yield on our marketable securities to be higher in 2006 as compared to 2005.
Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense consists primarily of costs of drug development work associated with our drug candidates, including:
| preclinical testing, |
30
Table of Contents
| clinical trials, |
| clinical supplies and related formulation and design costs, and |
| salaries and other personnel-related expenses. |
Research and development expense increased to $35.1 million from $18.9 million in the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the increase in Phase III clinical trials activities for Oxytrex, PTI-901 and Remoxy as well as continued development activities for Remoxy.
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense consists primarily of compensation and other general corporate expenses. General and administrative expense increased to $3.9 million from $3.3 million in the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, primarily due to an increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense.
Interest Income
Interest income increased to $1.2 million from $0.6 million in the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, primarily due to increases in average balances of marketable securities.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since inception, we have financed our operations primarily through public and private securities offerings. Additionally, in December 2005, we received a $150.0 million program fee under our strategic alliance with King. We intend to continue to use the proceeds from these offerings and from this program fee to fund research and development activities, capital expenditures, working capital requirements and other general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2005, cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $212.7 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $113.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to net cash used in operating activities of $32.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to the December 2005 program fee received from King. Cash used in operating activities in both years related primarily to the funding of operating losses.
We may use cash in 2007 to pay certain alternative minimum taxes related to using either net operating loss carryforwards or tax credits to offset revenue stemming from the upfront payment from King.
Our investing activities to purchase property, equipment and leasehold improvements used cash of $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 and $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. Other investing activities for both years consisted primarily of the purchase and sale of marketable securities. We expect to continue to invest in our infrastructure to support our operations.
Net cash provided by financing was $0.3 million in 2005 compared to $54.8 million in 2004. In 2004, we issued 8,000,000 shares of common stock at $7.25 per share in a follow-on public offering and received approximately $54.5 million in net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and related expenses. In 2005, we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-3, using a shelf registration process under which we may offer to sell any combination of securities described in such registration statement in one or more offerings, up to a total dollar amount of $150.0 million. We have not sold any securities under this shelf registration statement.
31
Table of Contents
We lease approximately 10,500 square feet of general office space. In addition to office space, we also lease equipment pursuant to operating leases. Our leases expire at various dates through 2010. Under the terms of our real property and equipment leases, annual minimum lease payments are as follows as of December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total | |||||||||||||
Future minimum lease payments |
$ | 191 | $ | 187 | $ | 196 | $ | 206 | $ | 160 | $ | 940 |
We have license agreements that require us to make milestone payments upon the successful achievement of defined milestones, including clinical milestones. Our license agreements also require us to pay certain royalties to our licensors if we succeed in fully commercializing products under these license agreements. All of these potential future payments are cancelable as of December 31, 2005. Our formulation agreement with Durect Corporation obligates us to make certain milestone payments upon achieving clinical milestones and regulatory milestones. King is obligated to reimburse us for any of our milestone payments and royalty payments to Durect Corporation.
We have an accumulated deficit of approximately $142.7 million. While our cash requirements to fund our operations may be lower in the future than in the year ended December 31, 2005 due to the obligation of King under the strategic alliance to reimburse us for certain expenses, we expect our cash requirements to be significant in the future. The amount and timing of our future cash requirements will depend on regulatory and market acceptance of our drug candidates and the resources we devote to researching and developing, formulating, manufacturing, commercializing and supporting our products. We believe that our current resources should be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months. We may seek additional future funding through public or private financing within this timeframe, if such funding is available and on terms acceptable to us.
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
The primary objective of our cash investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk. Some of the securities that we invest in may be subject to market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was issued with a fixed interest rate at the then-prevailing rate and the interest rate later rises, the principal amount of our investment will probably decline. A hypothetical 50 basis point increase in interest rates reduces the fair value of our available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2005 by approximately $0.6 million. To minimize this risk in the future, we intend to maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and marketable securities in a variety of securities, including commercial paper, government and non-government debt securities and/or money market funds that invest in such securities. We have no holdings of derivative financial or commodity instruments. As of December 31, 2005, our investments consisted of short-term investments in corporate and government notes and obligations or in money market accounts and checking funds with variable, market rates of interest.
32
Table of Contents
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
Page | ||
34 | ||
35 | ||
36 | ||
37 | ||
38 | ||
39 |
33
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Pain Therapeutics, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Pain Therapeutics, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pain Therapeutics, Inc. at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Pain Therapeutics, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 21, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Palo Alto, California
February 21, 2006
34
Table of Contents
BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands except share and per share data)
December 31, |
||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
|||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 95,651 | $ | 1,379 | ||||
Marketable securities |
117,001 | 98,018 | ||||||
Collaboration revenue receivable |
889 | | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
623 | 259 | ||||||
Total current assets |
214,164 | 99,656 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,556 | 1,461 | ||||||
Other assets |
75 | 75 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 215,795 | $ | 101,192 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 998 | $ | 877 | ||||
Accrued development expense |
4,461 | 6,358 | ||||||
Deferred program fee revenuecurrent portion |
26,200 | | ||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
501 | 415 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
187 | 146 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
32,347 | 7,796 | ||||||
Non-current liabilities |
||||||||
Deferred program fee revenuenoncurrent portion |
120,088 | | ||||||
Total liabilities |
152,435 | 7,796 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock; $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value; 120,000,000 shares authorized; 43,936,088 and 43,652,116 shares issued and outstanding in 2005 and 2004, respectively |
44 | 44 | ||||||
Additional paid-in-capital |
206,489 | 205,920 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(479 | ) | (544 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit |
(142,694 | ) | (112,024 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
63,360 | 93,396 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 215,795 | $ | 101,192 | ||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
35
Table of Contents
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands except per share data)
Years ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||
Program fee revenue |
$ | 3,712 | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Collaboration revenue |
1,368 | | | |||||||||
Total revenues |
5,080 | | | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Research and development |
32,938 | 35,093 | 18,913 | |||||||||
General and administrative |
4,859 | 3,868 | 3,338 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
37,797 | 38,961 | 22,251 | |||||||||
Operating loss |
(32,717 | ) | (38,961 | ) | (22,251 | ) | ||||||
Other income: |
||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
2,047 | 1,185 | 634 | |||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (30,670 | ) | $ | (37,776 | ) | $ | (21,617 | ) | |||
Basic and diluted loss per share |
$ | (0.70 | ) | $ | (1.01 | ) | $ | (0.73 | ) | |||
Weighted-average shares used in computing basic and diluted loss per share |
43,795 | 37,267 | 29,483 | |||||||||
Included in research and development and general and administrative expenses are stock-based compensation expenses of $248, $401, and $139 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
36
Table of Contents
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands except share data)
Common and Preferred stock |
Additional paid-in capital |
Deferred compensation |
Notes receivable for stock |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
Accumulated deficit |
Total stockholders equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
Par value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002 |
27,200,508 | $ | 27 | $ | 103,254 | $ | (304 | ) | $ | (122 | ) | $ | | $ | (52,631 | ) | $ | 50,224 | |||||||||||
Issuance of common stock pursuant to exercise of stock options |
272,150 | | 227 | | | | | 227 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock pursuant to follow-on offering, net of expenses |
7,730,500 | 8 | 46,650 | | | | | 46,658 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock pursuant to exercise of warrants |
120,000 | | 600 | | | | | 600 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of employee deferred compensation, net of reversals |
| | (406 | ) | 297 | | | | (109 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Compensation with respect to non-employee option grants |
| | 248 | | | | | 248 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock related to employee stock purchase plan |
58,151 | | 159 | | | | | 159 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Receipt of payment of stockholder notes receivable |
| | | | 122 | | | 122 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on investment in marketable securities |
| | | | | 50 | | 50 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | (21,617 | ) | (21,617 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
(21,567 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003 |
35,381,309 | 35 | 150,732 | (7 | ) | | 50 | (74,248 | ) | 76,562 | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock pursuant to exercise of stock options |
184,257 | 1 | 473 | | | | | 474 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock pursuant to follow-on offering, net of expenses |
8,000,000 | 8 | 54,074 | | | | | 54,082 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of employee deferred compensation, net of reversals |
| | | 7 | | | | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation with respect to non-employee option grants |
| | 394 | | | | | 394 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock related to employee stock purchase plan |
86,550 | | 247 | | | | | 247 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized losses on investment in marketable securities |
| | | | | (594 | ) | | (594 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | (37,776 | ) | (37,776 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
(38,370 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
43,652,116 | 44 | 205,920 | | | (544 | ) | (112,024 | ) | 93,396 | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock pursuant to exercise of stock options |
148,136 | | 159 | | | | | 159 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock pursuant to exercise of warrants |
60,450 | | 6 | | | | | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses pursuant to filing registration statements |
| | (116 | ) | | | | | (116 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Compensation with respect to non-employee option grants |
| | 248 | | | | | 248 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock related to employee stock purchase plan |
75,386 | | 272 | | | | | 272 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains on investment in marketable securities |
| | | | | 65 | | 65 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | (30,670 | ) | (30,670 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
(30,605 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
43,936,088 | $ | 44 | $ | 206,489 | $ | | $ | | $ | (479 | ) | $ | (142,694 | ) | $ | 63,360 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
37
Table of Contents
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Years ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
Cash flows used in operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (30,670 | ) | $ | (37,776 | ) | $ | (21,617 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
368 | 383 | 341 | |||||||||
Non-cash net interest income |
(100 | ) | (484 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||||
Non-cash stock based compensation |
248 | 401 | 139 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Collaboration revenue receivable |
(889 | ) | | | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
(364 | ) | 1,062 | (220 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable |
121 | (1,354 | ) | 960 | ||||||||
Accrued development expense |
(1,897 | ) | 5,148 | (167 | ) | |||||||
Deferred program fee revenue |
146,288 | | | |||||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
86 | 46 | 96 | |||||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
41 | 5 | (39 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
113,232 | (32,569 | ) | (20,534 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows used in investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(463 | ) | (156 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of marketable securities |
(93,591 | ) | (114,067 | ) | (68,829 | ) | ||||||
Sales of marketable securities |
74,773 | 81,341 | 3,559 | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(19,281 | ) | (32,882 | ) | (65,296 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Stock subscription note payments received |
| | 122 | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
321 | 54,803 | 47,644 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
321 | 54,803 | 47,766 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
94,272 | (10,648 | ) | (38,064 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
1,379 | 12,027 | 50,091 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 95,651 | $ | 1,379 | $ | 12,027 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
38
Table of Contents
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Business
Pain Therapeutics, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the development of innovative drugs. We specialize in developing safer or more efficacious drugs for use in pain management, particularly in the area of opioid painkillers, which are sometimes referred to as narcotic painkillers.
In the course of our development activities, we have sustained operating losses. There are no assurances that additional financing will be available on favorable terms, or at all.
Our development activities involve inherent risks. These risks include, among others, dependence on our collaboration partners, key personnel and determination of patentability and protection of our products and processes. In addition, we have drug candidates that have not yet obtained FDA approval. Successful future operations depend on our ability to obtain approval for and commercialize these products.
Prior to 2005 we were a development stage company.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition and Deferred Program Fee Revenue
In November 2005, we and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or King, announced that we have entered into a strategic alliance to develop and commercialize Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers. In connection with this strategic alliance, we recognize program fee revenue and collaboration revenue. Program fee revenue is derived from the upfront payment from King and is recognized ratably over our estimate of the development period under the strategic alliance with King. Collaboration revenues from reimbursement of development expenses are recognized as costs are incurred that relate to the strategic alliance with King.
Collaboration Revenue Receivable from King
We accrue a receivable for yet-to-be reimbursed development expenses incurred in connection with the strategic alliance with King. We expect to receive payment for the receivable within 90 days of the balance sheet date and classify the receivable as a current asset.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Concentration of Cash Risk
We consider all highly liquid financial instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash maintained at two financial institutions and money market funds.
Marketable Securities
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, we consider our investments to be held as available-for-sale. We
39
Table of Contents
PAIN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
classify these investments as current assets and carry them at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a separate component of stockholders equity as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). All realized gains and losses on our available-for-sale securities are recognized in results of operations. Our investments are maintained at one financial institution and are governed by our investment policy as approved by our Board of Directors. To date we have not recorded any impairment charges on marketable securities related to other-than-temporary declines in market value. We would recognize an impairment charge when the decline in the estimated fair value of a marketable security below the amortized cost is determined to be other-than-temporary. We consider various factors in determining whether to recognize an impairment charge, including the duration of time and the severity to which the fair value has been less than our amortized cost, any adverse changes in the investees financial condition and our intent and ability to hold the marketable security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets (generally two to five years). Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the assets or the lease term.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We regularly perform reviews to determine if the carrying value of our long-lived assets is impaired. We consider facts or circumstances, either internal or external, that indicate that we may not recover the carrying value of the asset.
We measure impairment loss related to long-lived assets based on the amount by which the carrying amounts of such assets exceed their fair values. Our measurement of fair value is generally based on an analysis of the present value of estimated future discounted cash flows. We use available information and reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections. We consider the likelihood of possible outcomes and our best estimates of projected future cash flows. If necessary, we perform subsequent calculations to measure the amount of the impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying value over the measurement of fair value of the impaired asset. No events or changes in circumstances have occurred with respect to our long-lived assets that would indicate that an impairment analysis should have been performed.
Business Segments
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, requires an enterprise to report segment information based on how management internally evaluates the operating performance of its business units (segments). Our operations are confined to one business segment: the clinical development and commercialization of novel painkillers.
Expenses for Clinical Trials
Research and development expense includes the cost of clinical trials. Expenses for clinical trials are incurred from planning through patient enrollment to reporting of the underlying data. We estimate expenses incurred for clinical trials that are in process based on patient enrollment and treatment as well as on clinical data collection and management. Costs that are associated with patient enrollment are recognized as each patient in the clinical trial completes enrollment. Costs that are based on clinical data collection and management are recognized based on estimates of unbilled goods and services received. In the event of early termination of a clinical trial, we accrue an amount based on estimates of the remaining non-cancelable obligations associated with winding down the clinical trial.
40
Table of Contents
PAIN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Stock Based Compensation
We use the intrinsic-value method of accounting for stock based awards granted to employees and directors in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and its related interpretations. Accordingly, we would recognize compensation expense in our financial statements in connection with stock options granted to employees and directors with exercise prices less than fair value at the time the stock option is granted. We record stock based compensation expense for non-employees at the fair value of the options granted in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, or SFAS 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force No. 96-18, or EITF 96-18. The fair value of options granted to non-employees is estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation model, or Black Scholes. The model considers a number of factors, including the market price and volatility of our common stock at the date of measurement. We periodically re-measure the compensation expense for options granted to non-employees as the underlying options vest. The compensation expense related to all grants is amortized using the graded vesting method, in accordance with SFAS 123, EITF 96-18 and FASB Interpretation No. 28, over the vesting period of each respective stock option, generally four years. Assuming no change in the fair value of the award, the graded vesting method results in expensing approximately 57% of the total award value in year one, 26% in year two, 13% in year three and 4% in year four.
If we had recorded compensation expense for our stock based plans in a manner consistent with the fair value approach of SFAS 123, our net loss and loss per share would have been increased as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
Net loss as reported |
$ | (30,670 | ) | $ | (37,776 | ) | $ | (21,617 | ) | |||
Deduct: Total stock based employee and director compensation expense determined under the fair valued based method for all awards |
(7,772 | ) | (6,188 | ) | (5,153 | ) | ||||||
Add (deduct): Total stock based employee and director compensation included in net loss |
| 7 | (109 | ) | ||||||||
Adjusted net loss |
$ | (38,442 | ) | $ | (43,957 | ) | $ | (26,879 | ) | |||
Net loss per share basic and diluted as reported |
$ | (0.70 | ) | $ | (1.01 | ) | $ | (0.73 | ) | |||
Adjusted net loss per share basic and diluted |
$ | (0.88 | ) | $ | (1.18 | ) | $ | (0.90 | ) | |||
The weighted average fair value of stock options granted to employees and directors was $4.47 in 2005, $6.25 in 2004, and $5.48 in 2003. The fair value of each option granted to both employees, directors and non-employees was estimated using Black-Scholes with an expected life of options of 5 years from vesting date for employees and directors, 10 years for non-employee options and no dividend yield. We assumed volatility was between 78% and 86% in 2005, 89% and 95% in 2004, and 91% and 100% in 2003. We used risk-free interest rates of between 4% and 5% in 2005, 3% and 4% in 2004, and 2% and 5% in 2003.
For the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the weighted-average fair value of purchase rights granted was $2.14 per share in 2005, $2.85 per share in 2004 and $2.74 in 2003 calculated using Black-Scholes with an expected life of 1 year in 2005 and 2 years in 2004 and 2003, and no dividend yield. We assumed volatility was between 41% and 46% in 2005, 89% and 94% in 2004 and between 91% and 100% in 2003. We used risk-free interest rates of 3% to 4% in 2005, 3% in 2004, and between 1% and 2% in 2003.
41
Table of Contents
PAIN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Loss per Share
Basic loss per share is computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted loss per share is computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus dilutive potential common shares outstanding using the treasury-stock method. Potential dilutive common shares consist of convertible preferred stock, outstanding stock options and outstanding warrants.
In all years presented we have reported a loss and therefore all potential common shares related to potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share because they are anti-dilutive. The following table sets forth the number of weighted-average potential shares of common stock that are in-the-money for the periods indicated but have not been included in the computation of diluted net loss per share because to do so would be anti-dilutive:
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
2005 |
2004 |
2003 | ||||
Options to purchase common shares |
1,695,391 | 3,363,985 | 1,084,553 | |||
Warrants |
150,000 | 220,000 | 220,000 | |||
1,845,391 | 3,583,985 | 1,304,553 | ||||
Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive loss is comprised of net loss and unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
Net loss |
($ | 30,670 | ) | ($ | 37,776 | ) | ($ | 21,617 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
65 | (594 | ) | 50 | ||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
($ | 30,605 | ) | ($ | 38,370 | ) | ($ | 21,567 | ) | |||
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets may not be realized. Management performs assessments of the realization of deferred tax assets considering all available evidence, both positive and negative. These assessments require that management make significant judgments about many factors, including the amount and likelihood of future taxable income.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued a revision of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, or SFAS 123R, which requires all share-based payments to employees and
42
Table of Contents
PAIN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
directors, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their values. We expect to calculate the value of share-based payments under SFAS 123R on a basis substantially consistent with the fair value approach of SFAS 123. We are required to adopt SFAS 123R in our fiscal quarter beginning January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective method. We expect the adoption of SFAS 123R will have a material impact on our results of operations in that fiscal quarter and in each subsequent quarter, although it will have no impact on our overall financial position. We cannot reasonably estimate the impact of adoption because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future as well as certain assumptions that can materially affect the calculation of the value share-based payments to employees and directors. However, had we adopted SFAS 123R in prior periods, the impact of the standard would have approximated the impact of SFAS 123 as described in the disclosure of pro-forma net loss and net loss per share in the Stock Based Compensation section above.
3. Collaboration Agreements
King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
In November 2005, we and King announced a strategic alliance to develop and commercialize Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers. King made an upfront cash payment of $150 million to us at the closing of this strategic alliance in December 2005, of which $3.7 million was recorded as program fee revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005. King is also obligated to pay us up to $150 million in payments based on the achievement of milestones in the course of clinical development of Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers under the strategic alliance. In addition, subject to certain limitations, King is obligated to fund development expenses incurred by us related to Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers pursuant to the collaboration agreement, of which $1.4 million was recorded as collaboration revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005. King is obligated to fund the commercialization expenses of, and has the exclusive right to market and sell, drugs developed in connection with the strategic alliance. King is obligated to pay us a 20% royalty on net sales of drugs developed in connection with the strategic alliance, except as to the first $1 billion in net sales of such drugs, for which the royalty is set at 15%.
Durect Corporation
We have an exclusive, worldwide licensing agreement with Durect Corporation to use a patented technology that forms the basis for a number of oral gel-cap drug candidates, including Remoxy. We have sub-licensed to King certain rights to develop and to commercialize Remoxy and certain other opioid drugs formulated in part with technology we licensed from Durect. Under the agreement with Durect, we control all of the preclinical, clinical, commercial manufacturing and sales/marketing activities for Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers. We reimburse Durect for formulation and related work, and will make milestone payments based on the achievement of certain technical, clinical or regulatory milestones. Durect will supply us with certain components of Remoxy and other abuse-resistant opioid painkillers on a cost-plus basis. We also are responsible to pay Durect royalties on any related drug sales. King is obligated to reimburse us for costs we incur under the agreement with Durect, including royalties.
43
Table of Contents
PAIN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
4. Cash and Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities held as available-for-sale consisted of the following (in thousands):
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost |
Accrued Interest |
Unrealized Gains |
Unrealized Losses on Investments Held Under One Year |
Unrealized Losses on Investments Held Over One Year |
Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash & cash equivalents: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Money market securities |
$ | 95,599 | $ | 52 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 95,651 | ||||||||
Total |
95,599 | 52 | | | | 95,651 | ||||||||||||||
Marketable securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agency obligation |
40,785 | 255 | | (76 | ) | (43 | ) | 40,921 | ||||||||||||
Corporate obligation |
65,644 | 854 | 7 | (188 | ) | (112 | ) | 66,205 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage/asset-backed securities |
9,928 | 14 | | (62 | ) | (5 | ) | 9,875 | ||||||||||||
116,357 | 1,123 | 7 | (326 | ) | (160 | ) | 117,001 | |||||||||||||
$ | 211,956 | $ | 1,175 | $ | 7 | $ | (326 | ) | $ | (160 | ) | $ | 212,652 | |||||||
December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash & cash equivalents: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Money market securities |
$ | 1,379 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,379 | ||||||||
Total |
1,379 | | | | | 1,379 | ||||||||||||||
Marketable securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agency obligation |
41,676 | 228 | | (265 | ) | | 41,639 | |||||||||||||
Corporate obligation |
44,574 | 648 | | (222 | ) | (5 | ) | 44,995 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage/asset-backed securities |
11,424 | 12 | | (52 | ) | | 11,384 | |||||||||||||
97,674 | 888 | | (539 | ) | (5 | ) | 98,018 | |||||||||||||
$ | 99,053 | $ | 888 | $ | | $ | (539 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 99,397 | |||||||
Of the $117.0 million of estimated fair value marketable securities at December 31, 2005, $107.6 million are in an unrealized loss position. This unrealized loss is primarily attributable to increases in prevailing interest rates subsequent to purchase of the underlying securities.
The gross realized losses and gains on the sale of available-for-sale securities during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were not material.
44
Table of Contents
PAIN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The contractual maturities of our marketable securities at December 31, 2005, consisted of the following (in thousands):
Less than one year |
$ | 38,060 | |
Greater than one year but less than three years |
78,941 | ||
$ | 117,001 | ||
5. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment at December 31, consisted of the following (in thousands):
2005 |
2004 |
|||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
$ | 1,089 | $ | 630 | ||||
Computers and software |
128 | 224 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
1,887 | 1,887 | ||||||
3,104 | 2,741 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(1,548 | ) | (1,280 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,556 | $ | 1,461 | |||||
Depreciation expense was $368, $383 and $341 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
6. Stockholders Equity
Common Stock
In 2003, we issued 7,730,500 shares of common stock at $6.50 per share in a follow-on public offering and received net proceeds of approximately $46.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and related expenses.
In 2004, we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement, using a shelf registration process, and reserved 15,000,000 shares of common stock to be offered via prospectus in amounts, at prices and at terms determined at the time of an offering and that may be sold directly by us to investors, through agents designated from time to time, or to or through underwriters or dealers. In 2004, we issued 8,000,000 shares of common stock at $7.25 per share in a follow-on public offering pursuant to this shelf registration statement and received net proceeds of approximately $54.5 million after deducting underwriting discounts and related expenses.
In 2005, we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement, using a shelf registration process under which we may offer to sell any combination of securities described in the registration statement in one or more offerings, up to a total dollar amount of $150 million. We have not sold any securities under this registration statement.
Preferred Stock
Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges, restrictions and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of the series.
45
Table of Contents
PAIN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
In 2005, our Board of Directors adopted a stockholder rights plan designed to guard against partial tender offers and other coercive tactics to gain control of the Company without offering a fair and adequate price and terms to all of Pain Therapeutics stockholders. Pursuant to the stockholder rights plan, our Board of Directors declared and paid a dividend of one right to purchase one one-thousandth share of the Companys Series A Participating Preferred Stock for each outstanding share of our common stock. Each of these rights entitles the registered holder to purchase from us one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Preferred at an exercise price of $40.00, subject to adjustment at any time.
Warrants
As of December 31, 2005, we have outstanding warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share. These warrants were issued in connection with corporate activities. The value of these warrants was immaterial. These warrants expire in 2010.
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Under the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the Purchase Plan, eligible employees may purchase common stock through payroll deductions of up to 15% of the employees compensation. The purchase price of the stock is generally 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock at the beginning of the offering period or at the end of the purchase period. A total of 500,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the Purchase Plan. Shares reserved for issuance under the Purchase Plan may be automatically increased each year by the amount equal to the lesser of (i) 500,000 shares, (ii) 1% of the initially outstanding shares of common stock on such date, or (iii) an amount determined by our Board of Directors. We have issued 276,510 shares of common stock pursuant to the Purchase Plan through December 31, 2005, leaving 223,490 shares reserved for issuance.
1998 Stock Plan
Under the 1998 Stock Plan, our employees, directors and consultants may be granted options that allow for the purchase of shares of our common stock. Incentive stock options may only be granted to employees. Through December 31, 2005 a total of 10,600,000 shares of common stock were authorized for issuance under the 1998 Stock Plan. The 1998 Stock Plan allows for annual increases in the number of common shares authorized for issuance equal to the lesser of (i) 2,000,000 shares, (ii) 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year, or (iii) an amount determined by our Board of Directors.
Our Board of Directors or a designated Committee of the Board is responsible for administration of the 1998 Stock Plan and determines the terms and conditions of each option granted, consistent with the terms of the plan. Incentive stock options may be granted under the 1998 Stock Plan at a price not less than 100% of the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant (not less than 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant in the case of holders of more than 10% of our voting stock). Options granted under the 1998 Stock Plan generally expire ten years from the date of grant (five years for incentive stock options granted to holders of more than 10% of our voting stock). Forfeited options become available for reissuance under the 1998 Stock Plan.
The 1998 Stock Plan also provides for the automatic grant of options to purchase shares of common stock to outside directors. On the date of each annual stockholders meeting, each outside director is automatically granted an option to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock. The term of the option is ten years, the exercise price is 100% of the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant, and the option becomes exercisable as to 25% of the shares on the anniversary of its date of grant provided the optionee continues to serve as a director on such dates.
46
Table of Contents
PAIN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The following table summarizes option activity under the 1998 Stock Plan:
Number of options |
Weighted- average exercise price | |||||
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2002 |
3,993,629 | $ | 6.15 | |||
Granted |
1,146,300 | 6.70 | ||||
Exercised |
(272,150 | ) | 0.83 | |||
Forfeited |
(499,270 | ) | 7.00 | |||
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2003 |
4,368,509 | 6.53 | ||||
Granted |
1,373,100 | 7.56 | ||||
Exercised |
(184,257 | ) | 2.57 | |||
Forfeited |
(222,618 | ) | 6.28 | |||
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2004 |
5,334,734 | 6.94 | ||||
Granted |
1,880,300 | 5.75 | ||||
Exercised |
(148,136 | ) | 1.08 | |||
Forfeited |
(73,406 | ) | 7.90 | |||
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2005 |
6,993,492 | $ | 6.74 | |||
Shares reserved for issuance and available for grant under the 1998 Stock Plan were 1,197,312 as of December 31, 2005.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2005:
Options outstanding |
||||||||||||
Number of |
Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) |
Weighted price |
Options exercisable | |||||||||
Range of exercise |
Number of vested options |
Weighted average exercise price | ||||||||||
$0.10$ 4.99 |
700,200 | 6.43 | $ | 2.80 | 509,226 | $ | 2.33 | |||||
5.25 |
995,000 | 9.41 | 5.25 | 145,101 | 5.25 | |||||||
5.34 6.67 |
718,904 | 8.76 | 6.06 | 209,920 | 6.21 | |||||||
6.71 6.85 |
786,000 | 6.72 | 6.75 | 616,166 | 6.72 | |||||||
6.90 |
700,000 | 6.45 | 6.90 | 685,416 | 6.90 | |||||||
6.92 7.16 |
842,452 | 7.47 | 7.13 | 502,750 | 7.13 | |||||||
7.25 7.75 |
745,512 | 8.52 | 7.50 | 237,397 | 7.50 | |||||||
7.78 8.00 |
763,300 | 8.12 | 7.80 | 333,818 | 7.83 | |||||||
8.03 14.13 |
667,124 | 5.92 | 9.72 | 585,244 | 9.88 | |||||||
18.63 |
75,000 | 4.71 | 18.63 | 75,000 | 18.63 | |||||||
$0.10$18.63 |
6,993,492 | 7.59 | $ | 6.74 | 3,900,038 | $ | 7.00 | |||||
7. Employee 401(k) Benefit Plan
We have a defined-contribution savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan covers substantially all employees. Employees are eligible to participate in the plan the first day of the month after hire and may elect to contribute the lesser of 20% of their annual compensation or the current statutory limits under Internal Revenue Service regulations. The 401(k) plan permits us to make additional matching contributions on behalf of all employees. Through December 31, 2005, we have not made any matching contributions.
47
Table of Contents
PAIN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
8. Income Taxes
There is no provision for income taxes because we have incurred losses through December 31, 2005. Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of net operating loss and tax credit carryovers and temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of our deferred tax assets are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, |
||||||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards |
$ | 51,300 | $ | 38,300 | $ | 25,300 | ||||||
Research and development credits |
7,200 | 7,700 | 4,800 | |||||||||
Stock related compensation |
800 | 900 | 4,700 | |||||||||
Other |
2,400 | 3,000 | 800 | |||||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
61,700 | 49,900 | 35,600 | |||||||||
Valuation allowance |
(61,700 | ) | (49,900 | ) | (35,600 | ) | ||||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon future earnings, if any, the timing and amount of which we are uncertain. We have concluded that it was more likely than not that our deferred tax assets would not be realized. Accordingly, the total deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance. The valuation allowance increased by $11,800, $14,300, and $12,590, during 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
As of December 31, 2005, we had net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $126.2 million, which expire in the years 2018 through 2025 and federal research and developments tax credits of approximately $5.8 million, which expire in the years 2018 through 2025. As of December 31, 2005, we had net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes of approximately $126.2 million, which expire in the years 2008 through 2015 and state research and development tax credits of approximately $1.3 million, which do not expire.
Utilization of our net operating loss and credit carryforwards may be subject to substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions. Such an annual limitation could result in the expiration of the net operating loss and credits before utilization.
9. Leases and Commitments
We conduct our product research and development programs through a combination of internal and collaborative programs that include, among others, arrangements with universities, contract research organizations and clinical research sites. We have contractual arrangements with these organizations, however these contracts are cancelable on thirty days notice and our obligations under these contracts are largely based on services performed.
We currently lease office space and equipment pursuant to non-cancelable operating leases that will expire at various dates through 2010. Future minimum lease payments for these leases are as follows for the years ended December 31, (in thousands):
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total | |||||||||||||
Future minimum lease payments |
$ | 191 | $ | 187 | $ | 196 | $ | 206 | $ | 160 | $ | 940 |
48
Table of Contents
PAIN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Rent expense was $178,000, $178,000, and $171,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 respectively.
10. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (in thousands except per share data)
Quarters Ended |
||||||||||||||||
March 31 |
June 30 |
September 30 |
December 31 |
|||||||||||||
2005 |
||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
| | | $ | 5,080 | |||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (8,589 | ) | $ | (10,182 | ) | $ | (8,767 | ) | $ | (3,132 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted loss per common share |
$ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||||
2004 |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (10,163 | ) | $ | (9,066 | ) | $ | (9,231 | ) | $ | (9,316 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted loss per common share |
$ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (0.22 | ) |
49
Table of Contents
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
Not applicable.
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Managements annual report on internal control over financial reporting. We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting. We have assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. Our assessment was based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO, in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.
Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
(1) | pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets; |
(2) | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and board of directors; and |
(3) | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Based on using the COSO criteria, we believe our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 was effective.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP has audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and has issued a report on managements assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as well as on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The attestation report of Ernst & Young LLP, the registered public accounting firm, on managements assessment of internal control over financial reporting is included below.
50
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Pain Therapeutics, Inc.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Pain Therapeutics, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Pain Therapeutics, Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Pain Therapeutics, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Pain Therapeutics, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the balance sheets of Pain Therapeutics, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 of Pain Therapeutics, Inc. and our report dated February 21, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Palo Alto, California
February 21, 2006
51
Table of Contents
Item 9B. | Other Information |
None.
PART III
Item 10. | Directors and Officers of the Registrant |
The information regarding our directors, executive officers and the audit committee of our board of directors is incorporated by reference from Directors and Executive Officers in our Proxy Statement for our 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than ten percent (10%) of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent (10%) stockholders are required by Commission regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. We believe all of our executive officers and directors complied with all applicable filing requirements during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. We publicize the Code of Ethics through posting the policy on our website, http://www.paintrials.com. We will disclose on our website any waivers of, or amendments to, our Code of Ethics.
Item 11. | Executive Compensation |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from our definitive Proxy Statement referred to in Item 10 above where it appears under the heading Executive Compensation and Other Matters.
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
The information required by this Item regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference from our definitive Proxy Statement referred to in Item 10 above where it appears under the heading Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. The table required by this Item regarding equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference from Item 5 above of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from our definitive Proxy Statement referred to in Item 10 above where it appears under the heading Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from our definitive Proxy Statement referred to in Item 10 above where it appears under the heading Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
52
Table of Contents
PART IV
Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
(a) | The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K: |
(1) | Financial Statements (included in Part II of this report): |
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Balance Sheets
Statements of Operations
Statement of Stockholders Equity
Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Financial Statements
(2) | Financial Statement Schedules: |
All financial statement schedules are omitted because the information is inapplicable or presented in the notes to the financial statements.
(3) | Exhibits: |
Exhibit Number |
Description of Document | |
3.1(1) | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. | |
3.2(1) | Amended and Restated Bylaws. | |
4.1(2) | Specimen Common Stock Certificate. | |
4.2(3) | Preferred Stock Rights Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2005, between the Registrant and Mellon Investor Services LLC, including the Certificate of Designation, the form of Rights Certificate and Summary of Rights attached thereto as Exhibits A, B and C, respectively. | |
10.1(4) | Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and each of its directors and officers. | |
10.2(4) | 1998 Stock Plan and form of agreements thereunder. | |
10.3(4) | 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and form of agreements thereunder. | |
10.4(5) | Employment Agreement dated August 29, 2000, between Registrant and Grant L. Schoenhard, Ph.D. | |
10.5(5) | Employment Agreement dated October 23, 2001, between Registrant and Nadav Friedmann, M.D., Ph.D. | |
10.6(4) | Second Amended and Restated Investors Rights Agreement dated as of February 1, 2000 between Registrant and the holders of its series B and series C redeemable convertible preferred stock. | |
10.7(6) | Lease Agreement dated July 21, 2000 between Registrant and Goss-Jewett Company of Northern California. | |
10.8 + | Collaboration Agreement dated November 9, 2005, between Registrant and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | |
10.9 + | License Agreement dated November 9, 2005, between Registrant and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | |
10.10+ | Development and License Agreement dated December 19, 2002 between Registrant and DURECT Corporation and Southern Biosystems, Inc. |
53
Table of Contents
Exhibit Number |
Description of Document | |
10.11+ | Amendment dated December 15, 2005 to Development and License Agreement dated December 19, 2002 between Registrant and DURECT Corporation and Southern Biosystems, Inc. | |
23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | |
24.1 | Power of Attorney (see page 55). | |
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(1) | Incorporated by reference from exhibits to our report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005. |
(2) | Incorporated by reference from exhibits to our report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference from exhibits to our report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 2005. |
(4) | Incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form S-1, registration number 333-32370, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 13, 2000. |
(5) | Incorporated by reference from exhibits to our report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2001. |
(6) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2000. |
+ | Confidential treatment has been requested for certain portions of this agreement. The omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
(b) | Exhibits |
The exhibits listed under Item 14(a)(3) hereof are filed as part of this Form 10-K other than Exhibit 32.1, which shall be deemed, furnished.
(c) | Financial Statement Schedules |
All financial statement schedules are omitted because the information is inapplicable or presented in the notes to the financial statements.
54
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PAIN THERAPEUTICS, INC. | ||
By: | /s/ REMI BARBIER | |
Remi Barbier | ||
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Dated: February 23, 2006
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Remi Barbier and Peter S. Roddy, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
Title |
Date | ||
/s/ REMI BARBIER Remi Barbier |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer) |
February 23, 2006 | ||
/s/ PETER S. RODDY Peter S. Roddy |
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
February 23, 2006 | ||
/s/ NADAV FRIEDMANN, PH.D., M.D., Nadav Friedmann, PH.D., M.D., |
Chief Operating and Medical Officer and Director |
February 23, 2006 | ||
/s/ ROBERT Z. GUSSIN, PH.D. Robert Z. Gussin, Ph.D. |
Director |
February 23, 2006 | ||
/s/ VERNON R. LOUCKS, JR. Vernon R. Loucks, Jr. |
Director |
February 23, 2006 | ||
/s/ MICHAEL J. ODONNELL, ESQ. Michael J. ODonnell, Esq. |
Director and Secretary |
February 23, 2006 | ||
/s/ SANFORD R. ROBERTSON Sanford R. Robertson |
Director |
February 23, 2006 |
55
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number |
Description of Document | |
3.1(1) | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. | |
3.2(1) | Amended and Restated Bylaws. | |
4.1(2) | Specimen Common Stock Certificate. | |
4.2(3) | Preferred Stock Rights Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2005, Registrant the Company and Mellon Investor Services LLC, including the Certificate of Designation, the form of Rights Certificate and Summary of Rights attached thereto as Exhibits A, B and C, respectively. | |
10.1(4) | Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and each of its directors and officers. | |
10.2(4) | 1998 Stock Plan and form of agreements thereunder. | |
10.3(4) | 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and form of agreements thereunder. | |
10.4(5) | Employment Agreement dated August 29, 2000, between Registrant and Grant L. Schoenhard, Ph.D. | |
10.5(5) | Employment Agreement dated October 23, 2001, between Registrant and Nadav Friedmann, M.D., Ph.D. | |
10.6(4) | Second Amended and Restated Investors Rights Agreement dated as of February 1, 2000 between Registrant and the holders of its series B and series C redeemable convertible preferred stock. | |
10.7(6) | Lease Agreement dated July 21, 2000 between Registrant and Goss-Jewett Company of Northern California. | |
10.8+ | Collaboration Agreement dated November 9, 2005, between Registrant and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | |
10.9+ | License Agreement dated November 9, 2005, between Registrant and King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | |
10.10+ | Development and License Agreement dated December 19, 2002 between Registrant and DURECT Corporation and Southern Biosystems, Inc. | |
10.11+ | Amendment dated December 15, 2005 to Development and License Agreement dated December 19, 2002 between Registrant and DURECT Corporation and Southern Biosystems, Inc. | |
23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | |
24.1 | Power of Attorney (see page 55). | |
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(1) | Incorporated by reference from exhibits to our report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005. |
(2) | Incorporated by reference from exhibits to our report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference from exhibits to our report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 2005. |
(4) | Incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form S-1, registration number 333-32370, declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 13, 2000. |
(5) | Incorporated by reference from exhibits to our report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2001. |
(6) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2000. |
+ | Confidential treatment has been requested for certain portions of this agreement. The omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
56