CAVCO INDUSTRIES INC. - Quarter Report: 2011 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-08822
Cavco Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 56-2405642 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
1001 North Central Avenue, Suite 800, Phoenix, Arizona | 85004 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(602) 256-6263
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last year)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one).
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act): Yes o No þ
As of November 7, 2011, there were 6,890,196 shares of the registrants common stock, $.01 par
value, issued and outstanding.
CAVCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2011
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2011
Table of Contents
Page | ||||||||
1 | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 - 32 | ||||||||
33 - 42 | ||||||||
42 | ||||||||
43 | ||||||||
44 | ||||||||
44 | ||||||||
44 | ||||||||
44 | ||||||||
45 | ||||||||
46 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
CAVCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 35,219 | $ | 76,513 | ||||
Restricted cash, current |
7,067 | 436 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
13,236 | 6,571 | ||||||
Short term investments |
5,608 | | ||||||
Current portion of consumer loans receivable, net |
20,260 | | ||||||
Inventories |
63,848 | 16,036 | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
8,326 | | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
6,582 | 2,495 | ||||||
Debtor-in-possession note receivable |
| 40,060 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
5,479 | 4,720 | ||||||
Total current assets |
165,625 | 146,831 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
453 | | ||||||
Investments |
10,834 | | ||||||
Consumer loans receivable, net |
103,531 | | ||||||
Inventory finance receivable, net |
19,468 | 17,759 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
50,510 | 35,993 | ||||||
Goodwill and other intangibles, net |
82,467 | 68,859 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 432,888 | $ | 269,442 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 10,802 | $ | 3,495 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
61,505 | 26,245 | ||||||
Construction lending line |
4,528 | | ||||||
Current portion of securitized financings |
11,539 | | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest note payable |
| 36,000 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
88,374 | 65,740 | ||||||
Securitized financings |
84,599 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
11,772 | 17,214 | ||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
83,804 | 35,819 | ||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares
authorized;
No shares issued or outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares
authorized;
Outstanding 6,890,196 and 6,817,606 shares,
respectively |
69 | 68 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
131,114 | 129,211 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
33,297 | 21,390 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(141 | ) | | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
164,339 | 150,669 | ||||||
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interest and
stockholders equity |
$ | 432,888 | $ | 269,442 | ||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1
Table of Contents
CAVCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 130,008 | $ | 45,888 | $ | 228,989 | $ | 93,393 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
101,780 | 38,709 | 184,601 | 79,773 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
28,228 | 7,179 | 44,388 | 13,620 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
21,588 | 5,489 | 38,578 | 10,725 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
6,640 | 1,690 | 5,810 | 2,895 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(1,916 | ) | | (3,377 | ) | | ||||||||||
Other income |
255 | 266 | 615 | 446 | ||||||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
| | 22,009 | | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
4,979 | 1,956 | 25,057 | 3,341 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(1,807 | ) | (757 | ) | (1,197 | ) | (1,292 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
3,172 | 1,199 | 23,860 | 2,049 | ||||||||||||
Less: net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
1,487 | 519 | 11,953 | 851 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Cavco
common stockholders |
$ | 1,685 | $ | 680 | $ | 11,907 | $ | 1,198 | ||||||||
Net income per share attributable
to Cavco
common stockholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 1.72 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
6,890,122 | 6,541,951 | 6,864,427 | 6,541,846 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
6,937,807 | 6,747,116 | 6,921,458 | 6,763,020 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
Table of Contents
CAVCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 23,860 | $ | 2,049 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,751 | 679 | ||||||
Provision for credit losses |
43 | 141 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(906 | ) | 478 | |||||
Share-based compensation expense |
456 | 327 | ||||||
Non-cash interest income |
(968 | ) | | |||||
Non-cash interest expense |
329 | | ||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of property, plant and equipment |
(53 | ) | 237 | |||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
(22,009 | ) | | |||||
Gain on sale of loans |
(2,816 | ) | | |||||
Gain on sale of investments |
(21 | ) | | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Restricted cash |
(1,160 | ) | 142 | |||||
Accounts receivable |
(3,549 | ) | 868 | |||||
Consumer loans originated |
(36,198 | ) | | |||||
Principal payments on consumer loans originated |
5,129 | | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of consumer loans |
36,981 | | ||||||
Inventories |
(583 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(1,306 | ) | 726 | |||||
Inventory finance receivable |
(1,725 | ) | (8,413 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
13,320 | (716 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
11,575 | (3,558 | ) | |||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(1,839 | ) | (459 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
1,044 | 15 | ||||||
Purchase of Palm Harbor assets and certain
liabilities, net of cash acquired |
(67,639 | ) | | |||||
Purchases of investments |
(2,053 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from sale of investments |
1,986 | | ||||||
Investment in debtor-in-possession note receivable |
(6,238 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from payoff of debtor-in-possession note
receivable |
45,301 | | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(29,438 | ) | (444 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
1,448 | | ||||||
Net proceeds from construction lending line |
554 | | ||||||
Payments on Virgo debt |
(19,456 | ) | | |||||
Payments on securitized financings |
(5,977 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(23,431 | ) | | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(41,294 | ) | (4,002 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
76,513 | 74,988 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 35,219 | $ | 70,986 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
$ | 1,229 | $ | 803 | ||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
$ | 3,371 | $ | | ||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Table of Contents
CAVCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of Cavco Industries, Inc., and its
subsidiaries (collectively, the Company or Cavco), have been prepared without audit pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for Quarterly Reports
on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of SEC Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America have been condensed or
omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.
In the opinion of management, these statements include all of the normal recurring adjustments
necessary to fairly state the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. The Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results or cash flows for the full year. Certain prior period amounts
have been reclassified to conform to current period classification. The Company has evaluated
subsequent events after the balance sheet date of September 30, 2011 through the date of the filing
of this report with the SEC and other than sale of the Buda, Texas facility discussed below; there
were no disclosable subsequent events. The Company suggests that these Consolidated Financial
Statements be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
with the SEC on June 3, 2011 (the Form 10-K).
During fiscal year 2010, the Company and an investment partner, Third Avenue Value Fund
(Third Avenue), formed Fleetwood Homes, Inc. (Fleetwood Homes), with a contribution of $35.0
million each for equal fifty-percent ownership interests. On August 17, 2009, Fleetwood Homes (i)
acquired seven operating manufactured housing plants, two idle factories, all related equipment,
accounts receivable, inventory, certain trademarks and trade names, intellectual property, and
specified contracts and leases; and (ii) assumed express warranty liabilities pertaining to certain
of the previous operations of a predecessor company.
The results of the Fleetwood Homes operations have been included in the Consolidated Financial
Statements and the related Notes in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting
Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC) 810, Consolidation (ASC 810).
Management has determined that, under GAAP, although Fleetwood Homes is only fifty-percent owned by
the Company, Cavco has a controlling interest and is required to fully consolidate the results of
Fleetwood Homes. The primary factors that contributed to this determination were Cavcos board and
management control of Fleetwood Homes. To that end, members of Cavcos management hold all of the
seats on the board of directors of Fleetwood Homes. In addition, as part of a management services
agreement among Cavco, Fleetwood Homes and Third Avenue, Cavco provides all executive-level
management services to Fleetwood Homes including, among other things, general management oversight,
marketing and customer relations, accounting and cash management. Third Avenues financial
interest in Fleetwood Homes is considered a redeemable noncontrolling interest, and is designated
as such in the Consolidated Financial Statements (see Note 22).
During fiscal year 2011, Fleetwood Homes, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Palm Harbor
Homes, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Palm Harbor or Palm Harbor Delaware), entered into an
agreement (the Purchase Agreement) with Palm Harbor Homes, Inc., a Florida corporation, and
certain of its subsidiaries (collectively Palm Harbor Florida) to purchase substantially all of
the assets and assume specified liabilities of Palm Harbor Florida, pursuant to an auction process
under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The effective date of the transaction was April 23,
2011 (the Acquisition Date), except for Palm Harbors acquisition of the stock of Standard
Casualty Co. The aggregate gross purchase price was $83.9 million and is exclusive of transaction
costs, specified liabilities assumed and post-closing adjustments. Approximately $45.3 million of
the purchase price was used to retire the Debtor-In-Possession (DIP) loan previously made by
Fleetwood Homes to Palm Harbor Florida. The purchase price was funded by Fleetwood Homes cash
on hand, along with equal contributions of $36.0 million each from the Company and Third Avenue.
On June 7, 2011, regulatory approval of the acquisition of Standard Casualty Co. was received from
the Texas Department of Insurance and on June 10, 2011 (the SCC Acquisition Date), Palm Harbor
Delaware completed the purchase of the insurance subsidiary.
4
Table of Contents
Palm Harbor Delaware acquired five operating manufactured housing production facilities, idled
factories in nine locations, 49 operating retail locations, one office building, real estate, all
related equipment, accounts receivable, customer deposits, inventory, certain trademarks and trade
names, intellectual property, and specified contracts and leases. In addition, as of the
Acquisition Date, Palm Harbor Delaware purchased all of the outstanding shares of CountryPlace
Acceptance Corp., CountryPlace Mortgage, Ltd. and their wholly-owned finance subsidiaries
(collectively, CountryPlace). Palm Harbor Delaware also acquired all of the outstanding shares of
Standard Casualty Co., Standard Insurance Agency, Inc. and its subsidiary (collectively,
Standard). Further, Palm Harbor Delaware assumed certain liabilities of Palm Harbor Florida,
including primarily debt facilities of the finance subsidiaries (see Note 21). The results of the
Palm Harbor operations since the Acquisition Date and SCC Acquisition Date have been included in
the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes in accordance with the provisions of
ASC 810.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the Company sold an idled production facility in
Arabi, Georgia for $495,000 and real estate in Waxahachie, Texas for $600,000 resulting in an insignificant effect on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. Subsequent to September 30, the Company sold an idled manufacturing facility located
at Buda, Texas for $1.3 million.
Standard is domiciled in Texas and is primarily a specialty writer of manufactured home
physical damage insurance. Standard holds insurance licenses in multiple states; however, a
significant portion of its writings occurs in Texas. In addition to writing direct policies,
Standard assumes and cedes reinsurance in the ordinary course of business (see Note 12).
CountryPlace originates single-family residential mortgages secured by manufactured and site-built homes, and services, for itself and others, conforming mortgages,
non-conforming land-home mortgages and manufactured homes chattel loans. CountryPlace is authorized
by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to directly endorse Federal Housing
Administration (FHA) Title I and Title II mortgage insurance, is approved by the Government
National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae) to issue GNMA-insured mortgage-backed
securities, and is authorized to sell mortgages to, and service mortgages for, the Federal National
Mortgage Association (FNMA or Fannie Mae). A
conforming mortgage or loan is one that conforms to the guidelines of
a government-sponsored enterprise, such as Fannie Mae, or a government agency, such as FHA; a
non-conforming mortgage or loan does not conform to these guidelines.
Revenue Recognition. Revenue from homes sold to independent retailers is generally recognized
when the home is shipped, at which time title passes to the independent retailer, and
collectability is reasonably assured. Homes sold to independent retailers are generally either
paid for prior to shipment or floorplan financed by the independent retailer through standard
industry arrangements, which include repurchase agreements. Manufacturing sales financed under
repurchase agreements are reduced by a provision for estimated repurchase obligations (see Note
14). The recognition of revenue from homes sold under inventory finance programs involving funds
provided by the Company is deferred until such time that payment for the related inventory finance
note receivable is received by the Company (see Note 6). Retail sales by Company-owned retail
locations are recognized when funding is reasonably assured, the customer has entered into a
legally binding sales contract, title has transferred and the home is accepted by the customer,
delivered and permanently located at the customers site.
At the Acquisition Date, management evaluated consumer loans receivable held for investment by
CountryPlace to determine whether there was evidence of deterioration of credit quality and if it
was probable that CountryPlace would be unable to collect all amounts due according to the loans
contractual terms. The Company also considered expected prepayments and estimated the amount and
timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows. The Company determined
the excess of the loan pools scheduled contractual principal and contractual interest payments
over the undiscounted cash flows expected as of the Acquisition Date as an amount that cannot be
accreted into interest income (the non-accretable
difference). The remaining difference is accreted into interest income over the remaining
life of the loans (referred to as accretable yield). Interest income on consumer loans receivable
is recognized as net sales.
5
Table of Contents
For loans originated by CountryPlace and held for sale, loan origination fees and gains or
losses on sales are recognized upon sale of the loans.
Premium income from insurance policies is recognized on an as-earned basis. Premium amounts
collected are amortized on a straight-line basis into net sales over the life of the policy.
Premiums earned are net of reinsurance ceded. Policy acquisition costs are also amortized as cost
of sales over the life of the policy.
Consumer Loans Receivable. Consumer loans receivable consists of manufactured
housing loans originated by CountryPlace (securitized, held for investment, or held for sale) and
construction advances on mortgages. CountryPlace was acquired on April 23, 2011 in
conjunction with the Palm Harbor transaction. The fair value of consumer loans receivable was
calculated as of the Acquisition Date, as determined by the present value of expected future cash
flows, with no allowance for loan loss recorded. The difference between the undiscounted cash flows
expected and the investment in the loan is recognized as interest income on a level-yield method
over the life of the loan. Increases in expected cash flows subsequent to the acquisition are
recognized prospectively through adjustment of the yield on the loans over the remaining life.
Decreases in expected cash flows subsequent to the acquisition are recognized as an allowance for
loan loss. Interest income on consumer loans receivable is recognized in net sales.
Loans held for investment consist of loan contracts collateralized by the borrowers homes
and, in some instances, related land. Construction loans in progress are stated at the aggregate
amount of cumulative funded advances. Loans held for sale consist of loan contracts collateralized
by single-family residential mortgages. Loans held for sale are stated at the lower of cost or
market on an aggregate basis. Loans held for sale are loans that, at the time of origination, are
originated with the intent to resell in the mortgage market to investors, such as Fannie Mae, with
which the Company has pre-existing purchase agreements, or to sell as part of a Ginnie Mae insured
pool of loans. Certain direct loan origination costs for loans held for sale are expensed as
incurred.
Prior to being acquired by the Company, on July 12, 2005 and March 22, 2007, CountryPlace
completed two securitizations of factory-built housing loan receivables. These two securitizations
were accounted for as financings, which use the portfolio method of accounting in accordance with
ASC 310, Receivables Nonrefundable Fees and Other (ASC 310). The securitizations included
provisions for removal of accounts, retention of certain credit loss risk by CountryPlace and other factors that preclude sale accounting
of the securitizations under ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing. Both securitizations were accounted
for as securitized borrowings; therefore, the related consumer loans receivable and securitized
financings were included in CountryPlaces financial statements. The Company acquired these
balances during the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as a part of the Palm Harbor transaction. Since
the Acquisition Date, the acquired consumer loans receivable and securitized financings are
accounted for in a manner similar to ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with
Deteriorated Credit Quality (ASC 310-30).
Allowance for Loan Losses. The primary portion of the allowance for loan losses reflects the Companys
judgment of the probable loss exposure on our inventory finance receivable as of the end of the
reporting period. The allowance for loan loss is developed at a portfolio level. A range of
probable losses is calculated and the Company makes a determination of the best estimate within the
range of loan losses. The Company has historically been able to resell repossessed homes, thereby
mitigating loss experience. If a default occurs and collateral is lost, the Company is exposed to
loss of the full value of the home loan. If the Company determines that it is probable that a
borrower will default, a specific reserve is determined and recorded within the estimated allowance
for loan loss. The Company recorded an allowance for loan loss of $185,000 and $169,000 at
September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively (see Note 6).
Another portion of the allowance for loan losses relates to consumer loans receivable originated by
CountryPlace after the Acquisition Date. This allowance for loan losses reflects CountryPlaces
judgment of the probable loss exposure on its loans originated since the Acquisition Date in the
held for investment portfolio as of the end of the reporting period.
6
Table of Contents
CountryPlace accounts for the loans that were in existence at the Acquisition Date in a manner
similar to ASC 310-30. Management evaluated such loans as of the Acquisition Date to determine
whether there was evidence of deterioration of credit quality and if it was probable that
CountryPlace would be unable to collect all amounts due according to the loans contractual terms.
Over the life of the loans, CountryPlace continues to estimate cash flows expected to be
collected. CountryPlace evaluates at the balance sheet date whether the present value of its
loans, determined using the effective interest rate, has decreased and, if so, recognizes an
allowance for loan loss subsequent to the Acquisition Date. The present value of any subsequent
increase in the loan pools actual cash flows expected to be collected is used first to reverse any
existing allowance for loan loss. Any remaining increase in cash flows expected to be collected
adjusts the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loan pools
remaining life (see Note 5).
CountryPlace has modified payment amounts and/or interest rates for borrowers that, in
managements judgment, exhibited the willingness and ability to continue to pay and met certain
other conditions. A modified loan is considered a troubled debt restructuring when two conditions
are met: (i) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, and (ii) concessions are made by
CountryPlace that it would not otherwise consider for a borrower with similar risk characteristics.
These modified loans were considered to be troubled debt restructurings. CountryPlace no longer
considers modified loans to be troubled debt restructurings once the modified loan is seasoned for
six months, is not delinquent under the modified terms and is at a market rate of interest at the
modification date.
Investment Securities. Management determines the appropriate classification of its investment
securities at the time of purchase. The Companys investments include marketable debt and equity
securities that are held as available-for-sale. All investments classified as available-for-sale
are recorded at fair value with any unrealized gains and losses reported in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax if applicable. Realized gains and losses from the sale of
securities are determined using the specific identification method.
Management regularly makes an assessment to determine whether a decline in value of an
individual security is other-than-temporary. The Company considers the following factors when
making its assessment: (i) the Companys ability and intent to hold the investment to maturity, or
a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in market value; (ii) whether it is probable
that the Company will be able to collect the amounts contractually due; and (iii) whether any
decision has been made to dispose of the investment prior to the balance sheet date. Investments
on which there is an unrealized loss that is deemed to be other-than-temporary are written down to
fair value with the loss recorded in earnings.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles. The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets
in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 350, IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (ASC 350). As
such, the Company tests goodwill annually for impairment by reporting unit and records an
impairment charge if the implied fair value of a reporting unit, including goodwill, is less than
its carrying value. As of September 30, 2011, all of the Companys goodwill of $67.3 million is
attributable to its manufacturing reporting unit. Certain intangibles are considered
indefinite-lived and others are subject to amortization over their useful lives. Intangible assets
are tested annually for impairment. In conjunction with the Palm Harbor transaction, the Company
acquired $15.3 million of intangible assets (see Note 8).
Reserve for Property-Liability Insurance Claims and Claims Expense. Standard establishes
reserves for claims and claims expense (loss) on reported and unreported claims of insured
losses. Standards reserving process takes into account known facts and interpretations of
circumstances and factors, including Standards experience with similar cases, actual claims paid,
historical trends involving claim payment patterns and pending levels of unpaid claims, loss
management programs, product mix and contractual terms, changes in law and regulation, judicial
decisions, and economic conditions. In the normal course of business, Standard may also supplement
its claims processes by utilizing third party adjusters, appraisers, engineers, inspectors, and
other professionals and information sources to assess and settle catastrophe and non-catastrophe
related claims. The effects of inflation are implicitly considered in the reserving process.
The applicable reserve balance was $977,000 as of September 30, 2011.
7
Table of Contents
Incurred But Not Reported Liabilities. Because reserves are estimates of unpaid portions of
losses that have occurred, including incurred but not reported (IBNR) losses, the establishment
of appropriate reserves, including reserves for catastrophes, is an inherently uncertain and
complex process. The ultimate cost of losses may vary from recorded amounts, which are based on
managements best estimates. The highest degree of uncertainty is associated with reserves for
losses incurred in the current reporting period as it contains the greatest proportion of losses
that have not been reported or settled. Standard regularly updates its reserve estimates as new
information becomes available and as events unfold that may affect the resolution of unsettled
claims. Changes in prior year reserve estimates are recorded in the period such changes are
determined. The applicable reserve balance was $126,000 as of September 30, 2011.
Other Income. Other income totals $255,000 and $266,000 for the three months ended September
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, other
income totaled $615,000 and $446,000, respectively. In fiscal 2012, other income consists of
interest related to Debtor-in-Possession note receivable and inventory finance receivable balances,
and of interest income earned on cash balances.
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
is comprised of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, which requires entities to provide new disclosures
in their financial statements about their financing receivables, including credit risk exposures
and the allowance for credit losses on a disaggregated basis. In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU
2011-02, A Creditors Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.
ASU 2011-02 clarifies when creditors should classify loan modifications as troubled debt
restructurings. In addition, ASU 2011-02 deferred the effective date of the disclosures about
troubled debt restructurings in ASU 2010-20 to periods beginning after June 15, 2011. As of
September 30, 2011, the Company has adopted all of the aforementioned provisions of ASU 2010-20 and
ASU 2011-02.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure
of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. The amendments in this update are
effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The
amendments affected the Companys disclosures of pro forma information surrounding the Palm Harbor
acquisition (see Note 21).
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to
Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The
amendments are effective for public companies for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2011. This update changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements for
measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments
in this update result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in GAAP and
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The Company is currently evaluating the
effect ASU 2011-04 will have on the Companys disclosures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of
Comprehensive Income. The amendments in this update are effective for public companies for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. In this update,
an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net
income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is
required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of
other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount
for comprehensive income. This update eliminates the option to present the components of other
comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders
equity. The Company is currently evaluating the effect ASU 2011-05 will have on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures.
8
Table of Contents
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (Topic 350):
Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The amendments in this update are effective for public companies
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. In this update, an entity has the option to
first assess qualitative factors to determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value
of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events
or circumstances, an entity determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of a
reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then it is required to perform the first step of
the two-step impairment test. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then performing the
two-step impairment test is unnecessary. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the effect ASU 2011-08 will have on the Companys disclosures in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
For a description of other significant accounting policies used by the Company in the
preparation of its Consolidated Financial Statements, please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in the Form 10-K.
2. Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash related to CountryPlace customer payments in
escrow
accounts to be remitted to third parties |
$ | 2,868 | $ | | ||||
Cash related to CountryPlace customers principal and
interest payments on securitized loans to be remitted to bondholders |
2,059 | | ||||||
Cash related to retail homebuyer deposits held in trust |
1,952 | 436 | ||||||
Other restricted cash |
641 | | ||||||
$ | 7,520 | $ | 436 | |||||
3. Investments
Available-for-sale securities were acquired during the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as a part
of the Palm Harbor acquisition. In accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805), the
individual securities were valued at fair value as of the Acquisition Date and, therefore, no
individual security has been in a continuous unrealized loss position for longer than 12 months as
of September 30, 2011. The following table summarizes the Companys available-for-sale investment
securities, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category (in
thousands):
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and Government
Agencies |
$ | 1,287 | $ | 10 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 1,296 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
4,948 | 20 | (18 | ) | 4,950 | |||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
1,197 | 27 | | 1,224 | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
4,041 | 3 | (34 | ) | 4,010 | |||||||||||
Marketable equity securities |
5,397 | 11 | (446 | ) | 4,962 | |||||||||||
$ | 16,870 | $ | 71 | $ | (499 | ) | $ | 16,442 | ||||||||
9
Table of Contents
Based on the Companys ability and intent to hold the investments for a reasonable period
of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of fair value, the Company does not consider any
investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2011.
The Companys investments in marketable equity securities consist of investments in common
stock of bank trust, insurance, and public utility companies ($2.5 million of the total fair value
and $46,000 of the total unrealized losses) and industrial and other companies ($2.5 million of the
total fair value and $400,000 of the total unrealized losses).
The amortized cost and fair value of the Companys investment securities, by contractual
maturity, are shown in the table below (in thousands). Expected maturities will differ from
contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or
without call or prepayment penalties.
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||
Amortized | Fair | |||||||
Cost | Value | |||||||
Due in less than one year |
$ | 645 | $ | 646 | ||||
Due after one year through five years |
6,655 | 6,666 | ||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
511 | 520 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
3,662 | 3,648 | ||||||
Marketable equity securities |
5,397 | 4,962 | ||||||
$ | 16,870 | $ | 16,442 | |||||
Realized gains and losses from the sale of securities are determined using the specific
identification method. Gross gains realized on the sales of investment securities for the three
and six months ended September 30, 2011 were approximately $11,000 and $20,000, respectively.
Gross losses realized were approximately $18,000 and $20,000 for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2011, respectively.
4. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 17,758 | $ | 10,208 | ||||
Work in process |
4,627 | 2,499 | ||||||
Finished goods and other |
41,463 | 3,329 | ||||||
$ | 63,848 | $ | 16,036 | |||||
10
Table of Contents
5. Consumer Loans Receivable
The Company acquired consumer loans receivable during the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as a
part of the Palm Harbor transaction. Acquired consumer loans receivable held for investment were
acquired at fair value and subsequently are accounted for in a manner similar to ASC 310-30.
Consumer loans receivable held for
sale are carried at the lower of cost or market value. The following table summarizes
consumer loans receivable (in thousands):
September 30, | ||||
2011 | ||||
Consumer loans receivable held for investment |
$ | 115,683 | ||
Consumer loans receivable held for sale |
4,122 | |||
Construction advances on non-conforming mortgages |
4,308 | |||
Consumer loans receivable |
124,113 | |||
Deferred financing fees and other, net |
(322 | ) | ||
Consumer loans receivable, net |
$ | 123,791 | ||
As of the Acquisition Date, management evaluated consumer loans receivable held for investment
by CountryPlace to determine whether there was evidence of deterioration of credit quality and if
it was probable that CountryPlace would be unable to collect all amounts due according to the
loans contractual terms. The Company also considered expected prepayments and estimated the
amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows. The Company
determined the excess of the loan pools scheduled contractual principal and contractual interest
payments over all cash flows expected as of the Acquisition Date as an amount that cannot be
accreted into interest income (the non-accretable difference). The remaining difference is
accreted into interest income over the remaining life of the loans (referred to as accretable
yield). Interest income on consumer loans receivable is recognized as net sales.
September 30, | April 23, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Consumer loans receivable held for investment
contractual amount |
$ | 311,020 | $ | 339,166 | ||||
Purchase Discount |
||||||||
Accretable |
(111,381 | ) | (118,335 | ) | ||||
Non-accretable |
(83,502 | ) | (100,151 | ) | ||||
Allowance for loan losses |
| | ||||||
Less consumer loans receivable reclassified as other assets |
(454 | ) | | |||||
Total consumer loans receivable held for investment, net |
$ | 115,683 | $ | 120,680 | ||||
Over the life of the loans, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be
collected by CountryPlace. The Company evaluates at the balance sheet date whether the present
value of its loans determined using the effective interest rate has decreased and, if so,
recognizes an allowance for loan loss subsequent to the Acquisition Date. The present value of any
subsequent increase in the loan pools actual cash flows expected to be collected is used first to
reverse any existing allowance for loan loss. Any remaining increase in cash flows expected to be
collected adjusts the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loan
pools remaining life.
The changes in accretable yield on acquired consumer loans receivable held for investment were
as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Balance at the beginning of the
period |
$ | 115,471 | $ | | ||||
Additions |
| 118,335 | ||||||
Accretion |
(4,090 | ) | (6,954 | ) | ||||
Balance at the end of the period |
$ | 111,381 | $ | 111,381 | ||||
11
Table of Contents
CountryPlaces consumer loans receivable consists of fixed-rate, fixed-term,
fully-amortizing single-family home loans. These loans are either secured by a manufactured home,
excluding the land upon which the home is located (chattel property loans and retail installment
sale contracts), or by a combination of the home and the land upon which the home is located (real
property mortgage loans). The real property mortgage loans are primarily for manufactured homes.
Combined land and home loans are further disaggregated by the type of loan documentation: those
conforming to the requirements of Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), and those that are
non-conforming. In most instances, CountryPlaces loans are secured by a first-lien position and
are provided for the consumer purchase of a home. In rare instances CountryPlace may provide other
types of loans in second-lien or unsecured positions. Accordingly, CountryPlace classifies its
loans receivable as follows: chattel loans, conforming mortgages, non-conforming mortgages, and
other loans.
In measuring credit quality within each segment and class, CountryPlace uses commercially
available credit scores (FICO). At the time of each loans origination, CountryPlace obtained
credit scores from each of the three primary credit bureaus, if available. To evaluate credit
quality of individual loans, CountryPlace uses the mid-point of the available credit scores, or if
only two scores are available, the Company uses the lower of the two. CountryPlace does not update credit bureau scores after the time of origination.
The
following table disaggregates CountryPlaces gross consumer loans receivable for each class by portfolio segment and
credit quality indicator as of September 30, 2011 (in thousands):
Consumer Loans Held for Investment | Consumer | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securitized | Securitized | Construction | Loans Held | |||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2007 | Unsecuritized | Advances | For Sale | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Asset Class |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Quality Indicator |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chattel loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
0-619 |
$ | 1,490 | $ | 989 | $ | 943 | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,422 | ||||||||||||
620-719 |
21,832 | 14,802 | 1,300 | | | 37,934 | ||||||||||||||||||
720+ |
25,230 | 17,139 | 789 | | | 43,158 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
48,552 | 32,930 | 3,032 | | | 84,514 | ||||||||||||||||||
Conforming mortgages |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
0-619 |
| | 419 | 663 | 594 | 1,676 | ||||||||||||||||||
620-719 |
| | 988 | 2,079 | 2,175 | 5,242 | ||||||||||||||||||
720+ |
| | 112 | 1,566 | 1,353 | 3,031 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
| | 1,519 | 4,308 | 4,122 | 9,949 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-conforming mortgages |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
0-619 |
97 | 869 | 2,945 | | | 3,911 | 620-719 |
2,240 | 8,928 | 5,468 | | | 16,636 | |||||||||||
720+ |
2,356 | 5,178 | 1,550 | | | 9,084 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
4,693 | 14,975 | 9,963 | | | 29,631 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
| | 19 | | | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 53,245 | $ | 47,905 | $ | 14,533 | $ | 4,308 | $ | 4,122 | $ | 124,113 | |||||||||||||
12
Table of Contents
Loan contracts secured by collateral that is geographically concentrated could experience
higher rates of delinquencies, default and foreclosure losses than loan contracts secured by
collateral that is more geographically dispersed. Consumer loans receivable secured by
factory-built homes are located in the key states shown below with the corresponding
percentage of loans aged 61 days or more:
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Aging 61 days or more | ||||||||||||
Portfolio | Percent of states | Percent of total | ||||||||||
State | concentration | loan balance | loan balance | |||||||||
Texas |
43.2 | % | 1.10 | % | 0.47 | % | ||||||
New Mexico |
6.6 | % | 0.59 | % | 0.04 | % | ||||||
Arizona |
6.6 | % | 3.93 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||||
Florida |
6.4 | % | 1.14 | % | 0.07 | % | ||||||
California |
2.1 | % | 3.37 | % | 0.07 | % | ||||||
All others |
35.1 | % | 1.73 | % | 0.67 | % | ||||||
100.0 | % | 1.58 | % |
The States of California, Florida and Arizona, and to a lesser degree Texas, have
experienced economic weakness resulting from the decline in real estate values. The risks created
by these concentrations have been considered by management in the determination of the accretable
yield and the adequacy of any allowance for loan losses. Other than Texas, no other states had concentrations in
excess of 10% of the principal balance of the consumer loans receivable as of September 30, 2011.
6. Inventory Finance Receivables and Allowance for Loan Loss
The Companys inventory finance receivables balance consists of two classes: (i) amounts
loaned by the Company under participation inventory financing programs; and (ii) direct inventory
financing arrangements for the home product inventory needs of our independent distribution base.
Under the terms of the participation programs, the Company provides loans to independent
financial institutions representing a significant portion of the funds that such financiers then
lend to retailers to finance their inventory purchases of our products. The participation
inventory finance receivables are unsecured general obligations of the independent floorplan
lenders.
Under the terms of the direct inventory finance arrangements, the Company provides all of the
inventory finance funds. The notes are secured by the inventory collateral and other security
depending on the borrowers (retailers) circumstances. The other terms of direct inventory
finance arrangements vary depending on the needs of the borrower and the opportunity for the
Company, but generally follow the same tenets as the participation programs.
Inventory finance receivables, net, consist of the following by class of financing receivable
(in thousands):
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Direct inventory finance receivables |
$ | 12,972 | $ | 12,157 | ||||
Participation inventory finance
receivables |
6,681 | 5,771 | ||||||
Allowance for loan loss |
(185 | ) | (169 | ) | ||||
$ | 19,468 | $ | 17,759 | |||||
The Company evaluates the potential for loss from its participation inventory finance
programs based on the independent lenders overall financial stability and has determined that an
applicable allowance for loan loss was not needed at either September 30, 2011 or March 31, 2011.
13
Table of Contents
With respect to the direct inventory finance notes receivable, the risk of loss is spread over
numerous borrowers. Borrower inventory levels and activity are monitored in conjunction with
third-party service providers, where applicable, to estimate the potential for loss on the related
notes receivable, considering potential exposures including repossession costs, remarketing
expenses, impairment of value and the risk of collateral loss. The Company has historically been
able to resell repossessed unused homes, thereby mitigating loss experience. If a default occurs
and collateral is lost, the Company is exposed to loss of the full value of the home loan. If the
Company determines that it is probable that a borrower will default, a specific reserve is
determined and recorded within the estimated allowance for loan loss. The Company recorded an
allowance for loan loss of $185,000 and $169,000 at September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011,
respectively. The following table represents changes in the estimated allowance for loan losses,
including related additions and deductions to the allowance for loan loss applicable to the direct
inventory finance receivables (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 173 | $ | 149 | $ | 169 | $ | 40 | ||||||||
Provision for credit losses |
12 | 32 | 16 | 137 | ||||||||||||
Loans charged off, net of
recoveries |
| | | 4 | ||||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 185 | $ | 181 | $ | 185 | $ | 181 | ||||||||
The following table disaggregates inventory finance notes receivable and the estimated
allowance for loan loss for each class of financing receivable by evaluation methodology (in
thousands):
Direct Inventory Finance | Participation Inventory Finance | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | March 31, | September 30, | March 31, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2011 | 2011 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Inventory finance notes receivable: |
||||||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
$ | 12,228 | $ | 11,116 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
744 | 1,041 | 6,681 | 5,771 | ||||||||||||
$ | 12,972 | $ | 12,157 | $ | 6,681 | $ | 5,771 | |||||||||
Allowance for loan loss: |
||||||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
$ | (185 | ) | $ | (169 | ) | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
| | | | ||||||||||||
$ | (185 | ) | $ | (169 | ) | $ | | $ | | |||||||
Loans are subject to regular review and are given managements attention whenever a
problem situation appears to be developing. Loans with indicators of potential performance
problems are placed on watch list status and are subject to additional monitoring and scrutiny.
Nonperforming status includes loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis and accruing loans with
principal payments past due 90 days or more. The Companys policy is to place loans on nonaccrual
status when interest is past due and remains unpaid 90 days or more or when there is a clear
indication that the borrower has the inability or unwillingness to meet payments as they become
due. Payments received on nonaccrual loans are recorded on a cash basis, first to interest and
then to principal. Charge-offs occur when it becomes probable that outstanding amounts will not be
recovered. At September 30, 2011, the Company did not have any loans on nonaccrual status and was
not aware of any potential problem loans that would have a material effect on the inventory finance
receivables balance. The following table disaggregates the Companys inventory finance receivables
by class and credit quality indicator (in thousands):
Direct Inventory Finance | Participation Inventory Finance | |||||||||||||||
September, 30 | March 31, | September, 30 | March 31, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2011 | 2011 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Risk profile based
on payment
activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Performing |
$ | 12,878 | $ | 11,995 | $ | 6,681 | $ | 5,771 | ||||||||
Watch list |
94 | 162 | | | ||||||||||||
Nonperforming |
| | | | ||||||||||||
$ | 12,972 | $ | 12,157 | $ | 6,681 | $ | 5,771 | |||||||||
14
Table of Contents
The Company has concentrations of inventory finance notes receivable related to
factory-built homes located in the following states, measured as a percentage of inventory finance
receivables principal balance outstanding as of September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011:
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Arizona |
23.3 | % | 21.9 | % | ||||
Texas |
14.5 | % | 18.0 | % | ||||
California |
4.3 | % | 9.0 | % |
The States of California, Arizona, and to a lesser degree Texas, have experienced
economic weakness. The risks created by these concentrations have been considered in the
determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. The Company did not have
concentrations in excess of 10% of the principal balance of the inventory finance receivables in
any other states as of September 30, 2011 or March 31, 2011, respectively.
7. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation is calculated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of each asset. Estimated useful lives for
significant classes of assets are as follows: buildings and improvements 10 to 39 years, and
machinery and equipment 3 to 25 years. Repairs and maintenance charges are expensed as incurred.
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost: |
||||||||
Land |
$ | 20,036 | $ | 16,046 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
26,839 | 19,672 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
15,803 | 11,453 | ||||||
62,678 | 47,171 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(12,168 | ) | (11,178 | ) | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ | 50,510 | $ | 35,993 | ||||
8. Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Intangible assets principally consist of goodwill, trademarks and trade names, state insurance
licenses, customer relationships, technology, insurance business in force, and policies and renewal
rights. Goodwill, trademarks and trade names and state insurance licenses are indefinite-lived
intangible assets and are tested for impairment annually and whenever events or circumstances
indicate that more likely than not impairment has occurred. During the six months ended September
30, 2011 and 2010, no impairment expense was recorded. The remaining intangibles are amortized over
their estimated useful lives and are reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The value of customer
relationships is amortized over 4 to 11 years, technology over 7 to 10 years, insurance business in
force over one year and insurance policies and renewal rights over 15 years.
15
Table of Contents
Goodwill and other intangibles consist of the following as of September 30, 2011 and March 31,
2011 (in thousands):
September 30, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | |||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amount | Amortization | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 67,346 | $ | | $ | 67,346 | $ | 67,346 | $ | | $ | 67,346 | ||||||||||||
Trademarks and trade names |
6,250 | | 6,250 | 800 | | 800 | ||||||||||||||||||
State insurance licenses |
1,100 | | 1,100 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total indefinite-lived
intangible assets |
74,696 | | 74,696 | 68,146 | | 68,146 | ||||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
6,200 | (617 | ) | 5,583 | 800 | (87 | ) | 713 | ||||||||||||||||
Insurance business in force |
2,070 | (1,107 | ) | 963 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Technology |
900 | (39 | ) | 861 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Insurance policies and
renewal rights |
374 | (10 | ) | 364 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total goodwill and other
intangible assets |
$ | 84,240 | $ | (1,773 | ) | $ | 82,467 | $ | 68,946 | $ | (87 | ) | $ | 68,859 | ||||||||||
Amortization expense recognized on intangible assets during the three and six months
ended September 30, 2011 was $1.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Amortization expense of
$13,000 and $26,000 was recognized during the three and six months ended September 30, 2010,
respectively.
9. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Estimated warranties |
$ | 10,809 | $ | 9,371 | ||||
Customer deposits |
9,863 | 1,857 | ||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits |
9,606 | 4,342 | ||||||
Unearned premiums |
5,842 | | ||||||
Deferred margin |
4,365 | 4,305 | ||||||
Accured taxes |
3,233 | 707 | ||||||
Accrued insurance |
3,077 | 1,731 | ||||||
Accrued volume rebates |
1,940 | 885 | ||||||
Insurance loss reserves |
1,103 | | ||||||
Reserve for repurchase commitments |
815 | 597 | ||||||
Other (various) |
10,852 | 2,450 | ||||||
$ | 61,505 | $ | 26,245 | |||||
16
Table of Contents
10. Warranties
Homes are generally warranted against manufacturing defects for a period of one year
commencing at the time of sale to the retail customer. Estimated costs relating to home warranties
are provided at the date of sale. The Company has recorded a liability for estimated future
warranty costs relating to homes sold based upon managements assessment of historical experience
factors, an estimate of the amount of homes in the distribution channel and current industry
trends. Activity in the liability for estimated warranties was as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of
period |
$ | 11,483 | $ | 12,991 | $ | 9,371 | $ | 13,891 | ||||||||
Liability assumed with
Palm Harbor |
| | 1,932 | | ||||||||||||
Charged to costs and
expenses |
2,456 | 1,073 | 5,462 | 2,286 | ||||||||||||
Payments and deductions |
(3,130 | ) | (2,173 | ) | (5,956 | ) | (4,286 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 10,809 | $ | 11,891 | $ | 10,809 | $ | 11,891 | ||||||||
11. Debt Obligations
The Company acquired securitized financings during the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as a part
of the Palm Harbor acquisition. Acquired securitized financings were acquired at fair value, which
resulted in a discount, and subsequently are accounted for a manner similar to ASC 310-30 to
accrete the discount.
The Company considers expected prepayments and estimates the amount and timing of undiscounted
expected principal, interest and other cash flows for consumer loans receivable held for investment
to determine the expected cash flows on securitized financings and the contractual payments. The
amount of contractual principal and contractual interest payments due on the securitized financings
in excess of all cash flows expected as of the Acquisition Date cannot be accreted into interest
expense (the non-accretable difference). The remaining amount is accreted into interest expense
over the remaining life of the obligation (referred to as accretable yield).
September 30, | April 23, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Securitized financings contractual
amount |
$ | 125,917 | $ | 134,205 | ||||
Purchase Discount |
||||||||
Accretable |
(29,779 | ) | (32,072 | ) | ||||
Non-accretable (1) |
| | ||||||
Total securitized financings, net |
$ | 96,138 | $ | 102,133 | ||||
(1) | Because the contractual payments on securitized financing are determined by actual cash flows, the Company expects that there will not be a non-accretable difference. |
Over the life of the loans, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be paid
on securitized financings. The Company evaluates at the balance sheet date whether the present
value of its securitized financings determined using the effective interest rate, has increased or decreased.
The present value of any subsequent change in cash flows expected to be paid adjusts the amount
of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the securitized financings remaining
life.
17
Table of Contents
The changes in accretable yield on securitized financings were as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Balance at the beginning of the period |
$ | 31,346 | $ | | ||||
Additions |
| 32,072 | ||||||
Accretion |
(1,567 | ) | (2,293 | ) | ||||
Balance at the end of the period |
$ | 29,779 | $ | 29,779 | ||||
On July 12, 2005, prior to the acquisition of Palm Harbor and CountryPlace, CountryPlace
completed its initial securitization (2005-1) for approximately $141.0 million of loans, which was
funded by issuing bonds totaling approximately $118.4 million. The bonds were issued in four
different classes: Class A-1 totaling $36.3 million with a coupon rate of 4.23%; Class A-2
totaling $27.4 million with a coupon rate of 4.42%; Class A-3 totaling $27.3 million with a coupon
rate of 4.80%; and Class A-4 totaling $27.4 million with a coupon rate of 5.20%. Maturity of the
bonds is at varying dates beginning in 2006 through 2015 and were issued with an expected weighted
average maturity of 4.66 years. For accounting purposes, this transaction was structured as a
securitized borrowing.
As of September 30, 2011, the Class A-1 and Class A-2 bonds had been retired.
On March 22, 2007, CountryPlace, completed its second securitization (2007-1) for
approximately $116.5 million of loans, which was funded by issuing bonds totaling approximately
$101.9 million. The bonds were issued in four classes: Class A-1 totaling $28.9 million with a
coupon rate of 5.484%; Class A-2 totaling $23.4 million with a coupon rate of 5.232%; Class A-3
totaling $24.5 million with a coupon rate of 5.593%; and Class A-4 totaling $25.1 million with a
coupon rate of 5.846%. The bonds mature at varying dates beginning in 2008 through 2017 and were
issued with an expected weighted average maturity of 4.86 years. For accounting purposes, this
transaction was also structured as a securitized borrowing.
As of September 30, 2011, the Class A-1 and Class A-2 bonds had been retired.
12. Reinsurance
Standard
is primarily a specialty writer of manufactured home physical damage insurance.
Certain of Standards premiums and benefits are assumed from and ceded to other insurance
companies under various reinsurance agreements. The ceded reinsurance agreements provide Standard
with increased
capacity to write larger risks and maintain its exposure to loss within its capital resources.
Standard remains obligated for amounts ceded in the event that the reinsurers do not meet their
obligations. Substantially all of Standards assumed reinsurance is with one entity.
The effects of reinsurance on premiums written and earned are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | SCC Acquisition Date to | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2011 | September 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Written | Earned | Written | Earned | |||||||||||||
Direct premiums |
$ | 436 | $ | 324 | $ | 629 | $ | 411 | ||||||||
Assumed premiums
nonaffiliate |
2,572 | 2,434 | 3,481 | 3,214 | ||||||||||||
Ceded premiums nonaffiliate |
(398 | ) | (398 | ) | (513 | ) | (513 | ) | ||||||||
Net premiums |
$ | 2,610 | $ | 2,360 | $ | 3,597 | $ | 3,112 | ||||||||
Typical insurance policies written or assumed by Standard have a maximum coverage of
$300,000 per claim, of which Standard cedes $240,000 of the risk of loss per reinsurance.
Therefore, Standard maintains risk of loss limited to $60,000 per claim on typical policies.
Amounts are recoverable by Standard through reinsurance for catastrophic losses in excess of $500,000 per occurrence up to a maximum
of $7.5 million in the aggregate.
18
Table of Contents
13. Income Taxes
The Companys deferred tax assets primarily result from financial statement accruals not
currently deductible for tax purposes and differences in the acquired basis of certain assets, and
its deferred tax liabilities primarily result from tax amortization of goodwill and other
intangible assets. The Company complies with the provisions of FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC
740), which clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition
threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements.
ASC 740 also provides guidance on derecognizing, measurement, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company has recorded an
insignificant amount of unrecognized tax benefits and there would be an insignificant effect on the
effective tax rate if all unrecognized tax benefits were recognized. The Company classifies
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense.
Income tax returns are filed in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in several state
jurisdictions. In July 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completed its examination of the
Companys federal income tax return for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009. The examination
resulted in an insignificant payment of additional taxes. The Company is no longer subject to
examination by the IRS for years before fiscal year 2007. The Company believes that its income
tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained on audit and does not anticipate any
adjustments that will result in a material change to the Companys financial position. The total
amount of unrecognized tax benefit related to any particular tax position is not anticipated to
change significantly within the next 12 months. The provision for income taxes generally
represents income taxes paid or payable for the current year plus the change in deferred taxes
during the year.
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Repurchase Contingencies. The Company is contingently liable under terms of repurchase
agreements with financial institutions providing inventory financing for retailers of its products.
These arrangements, which are customary in the industry, provide for the repurchase of products
sold to retailers in the event of default by the retailer. The risk of loss under these agreements
is spread over numerous retailers. The price the Company is obligated to pay generally declines
over the period of the agreement (generally 18 to 36 months, calculated from the date of sale to
the retailer) and the risk of loss is further reduced by the resale value of the homes. The maximum
amount for which the Company was contingently liable under such agreements approximated $12.1
million at September 30, 2011, without reduction for the resale value of the homes. The Company
applies FASB ASC 460, Guarantees (ASC 460), and FASB ASC 450-20, Loss Contingencies
(ASC 450-20), to account for its liability for repurchase commitments. Under the provisions
of ASC 460, the Company records the greater of the estimated value of the non-contingent obligation
or a contingent liability for each repurchase arrangement under the provisions of ASC 450-20. The
Company recorded an estimated liability of $815,000 and $597,000 at September 30, 2011 and March
31, 2011, respectively, related to these commitments.
Letters of Credit. The Company maintains a $100,000 outstanding letter of credit with
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A. issued to satisfy the remaining requirements of the self-funded
workers compensation program which concluded on September 30, 2006. To secure certain reinsurance
contracts, Standard has an irrevocable letter of credit of $5.0 million outstanding at September
30, 2011 related to assumed premiums as assurance that Standard will fulfill its reinsurance
obligations. This letter of credit is secured by certain of the Companys investments. Standard also
maintains an irrevocable standby letter of credit of
$2.0 million related to a supply bond for a
construction project for Palm Harbor Homes. CountryPlace maintains an irrevocable standby letter
of credit of $100,000 related to state licensing requirements. There have been no draws on any of
the aforementioned letters of credit.
Construction-Period Mortgages. CountryPlace funds construction-period mortgages through
periodic advances during the period of home construction. At the time of initial funding,
CountryPlace commits to fully fund the loan contract in accordance with a predetermined schedule.
Subsequent advances are contingent upon the performance of contractual obligations by the seller of
the home and the borrower. Construction-period mortgages are carried in the consolidated balance
sheet at the actual amount of cumulative advances, which are included in consumer loans receivable.
The total loan contract amount, less cumulative advances, represents an off-balance sheet
contingent commitment of CountryPlace to fund future advances.
19
Table of Contents
Loan contracts with off-balance sheet commitments are summarized below (in thousands):
September 30, | ||||
2011 | ||||
Construction loan contract amount |
$ | 9,185 | ||
Cumulative advances |
(4,308 | ) | ||
Remaining construction contingent commitment |
$ | 4,877 | ||
Representations and Warranties of Mortgages Sold. CountryPlace sells loans to GSEs and
whole-loan purchasers. In connection with these activities, CountryPlace provides to the GSEs and
whole-loan purchasers, representations and warranties related to the loans sold. These
representations and warranties generally relate to the ownership of the loan, the validity of the
lien securing the loan, the loans compliance with the criteria for inclusion in the sale
transactions, including compliance with underwriting standards or loan criteria established by the
buyer, and CountryPlaces ability to deliver documentation in compliance with applicable laws.
Generally, representations and warranties may be enforced at any time over the life of the loan.
Upon a breach of a representation, CountryPlace may be required to repurchase the loan or to
indemnify a party for incurred losses. Repurchase demands and claims for indemnification payments
are reviewed on a loan-by-loan basis to validate if there has been a breach requiring repurchase.
CountryPlace manages the risk of repurchase through underwriting and quality assurance practices
and by servicing the mortgage loans to investor standards. CountryPlace maintains a reserve for
these contingent repurchase and indemnification obligations. This reserve of $272,000 as of
September 30, 2011, included in accrued liabilities, reflects managements estimate of probable
loss. CountryPlace considers a variety of assumptions, including borrower performance (both actual
and estimated future defaults), historical repurchase demands and loan defect rates to estimate the
liability for loan repurchases and indemnifications. There were no claim requests during the six
months ended September 30, 2011, and no claims open for review as of September 30, 2011.
Interest Rate Lock Commitments. In originating loans for sale, CountryPlace issues interest
rate lock commitments (IRLCs) to prospective borrowers and third-party originators. These IRLCs
represent an agreement to extend credit to a loan applicant, or an agreement to purchase a loan
from a third-party originator,
whereby the interest rate on the loan is set prior to loan closing or sale. These IRLCs bind
CountryPlace to fund the approved loan at the specified rate regardless of whether interest rates
or market prices for similar loans have changed between the commitment date and the closing date.
As such, outstanding IRLCs are subject to interest rate risk and related loan sale price risk
during the period from the date of the IRLC through the earlier of the loan sale date or IRLC
expiration date. The loan commitments generally range between 30 and 180 days; however, borrowers
are not obligated to close the related loans. As a result, CountryPlace is subject to fallout risk
related to IRLCs, which is realized if approved borrowers choose not to close on the loans within
the terms of the IRLCs. CountryPlace maintains a reserve for loan price adjustments related to this
interest rate risk. The recorded reserve was $618,000 as of September 30, 2011. In determining the adequacy of this reserve, CountryPlace considers recent fallout
rate experience by type of origination source and forward loan pricing information provided by
investors for various loan types and terms.
Legal Matters. The Company is party to certain legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary
course and are incidental to its business. Certain of the claims pending against the Company in
these proceedings allege, among other things, breach of contract and warranty, product liability
and personal injury. Although litigation is inherently uncertain, based on past experience and the
information currently available, management does not believe that the currently pending and
threatened litigation or claims will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated
financial position, liquidity or results of operations. However, future events or circumstances
currently unknown to management will determine whether the resolution of pending or threatened
litigation or claims will ultimately have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial
position, liquidity or results of operations in any future reporting periods.
20
Table of Contents
15. Stockholders Equity
The
following table represents changes in stockholders equity attributable
to Cavcos stockholders and redeemable non-controlling interest for the six months ended September
30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
Equity Attributable to Cavco Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redeemable | Additional | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling | Common Stock | Paid-in | Retained | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Loss | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2011 |
$ | 35,819 | 6,817,606 | $ | 68 | $ | 129,211 | $ | 21,390 | $ | | $ | 150,669 | |||||||||||||||
Stock option exercises and
associated tax benefits |
| 72,590 | 1 | 1,447 | | | 1,448 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation |
| | | 456 | | | 456 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Note payable conversion |
36,173 | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
11,953 | | | | 11,907 | | 11,907 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
(141 | ) | | | | | (141 | ) | (141 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2011 |
$ | 83,804 | 6,890,196 | $ | 69 | $ | 131,114 | $ | 33,297 | $ | (141 | ) | $ | 164,339 | ||||||||||||||
16. Other Comprehensive Income
The difference between net income and total comprehensive income for the three and six months
ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,172 | $ | 1,199 | $ | 23,860 | $ | 2,049 | ||||||||
Unrealized loss on
available-for-sale
investments, net of tax |
(219 | ) | | (282 | ) | | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 2,953 | $ | 1,199 | $ | 23,578 | $ | 2,049 | ||||||||
17. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company maintains stock incentive plans whereby stock option grants or awards of
restricted stock may be made to certain officers, directors and key employees. The plans, which
are shareholder approved, permit the award of up to 1,350,000 shares of the Companys common stock,
of which 272,026 shares were still available for grant at September 30, 2011. When options are
exercised, new shares of the Companys common stock are issued. Stock options may not be granted
below 100% of the fair market value of the Companys common stock at the date of grant and
generally expire seven years from the date of grant. Stock options and awards of restricted stock
vest over a period determined by the plan administrator, typically a one to five year period. The
stock incentive plans provide for accelerated vesting of stock options and removal of restrictions
on restricted stock awards upon a change in control (as defined in the plans).
21
Table of Contents
Stock-based compensation cost charged against income for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2011, was approximately $271,000 and $456,000, respectively. The Company recorded
stock-based compensation expense of $189,000 and $327,000 for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively.
As of September 30, 2011, total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options was
approximately $2.4 million and the related weighted-average period over which it is expected to be
recognized is approximately 2.5 years.
The following table summarizes the option activity within the Companys stock-based
compensation plans for the six months ended September 30, 2011:
Number | ||||
of Shares | ||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 |
401,500 | |||
Granted |
77,100 | |||
Exercised |
(72,250 | ) | ||
Outstanding at September 30, 2011 |
406,350 | |||
Exercisable at September 30, 2011 |
164,500 | |||
A summary of restricted stock activity within the Companys share-based compensation
plans and changes for the six months ended September 30, 2011 is as follows:
Number | ||||
of Shares | ||||
Nonvested at March 31, 2011 |
498 | |||
Vested |
(340 | ) | ||
Nonvested at September 30, 2011 |
158 | |||
22
Table of Contents
18. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed based
on the combination of dilutive common share equivalents, comprised of shares issuable under the
Companys share-based compensation plans and the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the reporting period. Dilutive common share equivalents include the dilutive
effect of in-the-money options to purchase shares, which is calculated based on the average share
price for each period using the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth the
computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Cavco
common stockholders |
$ | 1,685 | $ | 680 | $ | 11,907 | $ | 1,198 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
6,890,122 | 6,541,951 | 6,864,427 | 6,541,846 | ||||||||||||
Common stock
equivalents treasury stock method |
47,685 | 205,165 | 57,031 | 221,174 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
6,937,807 | 6,747,116 | 6,921,458 | 6,763,020 | ||||||||||||
Net income per share attributable
to Cavco
common stockholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 1.72 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||
Anti-dilutive common stock equivalents excluded from the computation of diluted earnings
per share for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were 16,609 and 9,376,
respectively. There were 7,387 and 1,856 anti-dilutive common stock equivalents excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings per share for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
19. Fair Value Measurements
The book value and estimated fair value of the Companys financial instruments are as follows
(in thousands):
September 30, 2011 | March 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Book | Estimated | Book | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Value | Fair Value | Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents (1) |
$ | 35,219 | $ | 35,219 | $ | 76,513 | $ | 76,513 | ||||||||
Restricted cash (1) |
7,520 | 7,520 | 436 | 436 | ||||||||||||
Investments (2) |
16,442 | 16,442 | | | ||||||||||||
Consumer loans receivable (3) |
123,791 | 123,127 | | | ||||||||||||
Inventory finance receivable
(4) |
19,468 | 19,468 | 17,759 | 17,759 | ||||||||||||
Construction lending line (1) |
4,528 | 4,528 | | | ||||||||||||
Securitized financings (5) |
96,138 | 99,671 | | |
(1) | The fair value approximates book value due to the instruments short term maturity. | |
(2) | The fair value is based on market prices. | |
(3) | Includes consumer loans receivable held for investment, held for sale and construction advances. The fair value of the loans held for investment is based on the discounted value of the remaining principal and interest cash flows. The fair value of the loans held for sale approximates book value since the sales price of these loans is known as of September 30, 2011. | |
(4) | The fair value approximates book value based on current market rates and the revolving nature of the loan portfolio. | |
(5) | The fair value is estimated using recent transactions of asset-backed securities. |
23
Table of Contents
In accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), fair value is
defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability
(an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes
a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three
levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2 | Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
Level 3 | Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The Company had no level 3 securities as of September 30, 2011. |
The Company utilizes the market approach to measure fair value for its financial assets and
liabilities. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market
transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):
As of September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
Securities issued by the U.S Treasury and Government (1) |
$ | 1,296 | $ | | $ | 1,296 | $ | | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities (1) |
4,950 | | 4,950 | | ||||||||||||
Securities issued by states and political subdivisions
(1) |
1,224 | | 1,224 | | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities (1) |
4,010 | | 4,010 | | ||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities (1) |
4,962 | 4,962 | | |
(1) | Unrealized gains or losses on investments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss at each measurement date. |
No significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 occurred during the six months ended
September 30, 2011. The Companys policy regarding the recording of transfers between levels is to
record any such transfers at the end of the reporting period.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below
(in thousands):
As of September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
Loans held for investment |
$ | 116,536 | $ | | $ | | $ | 116,536 | ||||||||
Loans held for sale |
4,437 | 4,437 | | | ||||||||||||
Construction advances |
2,154 | | | 2,154 | ||||||||||||
Inventory finance
receivable |
19,468 | | | 19,468 | ||||||||||||
Construction lending
facility |
4,528 | 4,528 | | | ||||||||||||
Securitized financings |
99,671 | | 99,671 | |
The Company records impairment losses on long-lived assets held for sale when the fair
value of such long-lived assets is below their carrying values. The Company records impairment
charges on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that
long-lived assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by
those assets are less than their carrying amounts. The Company recorded no impairment charges on
assets held for sale or used in operations during either the three or six months ended September
30, 2011.
24
Table of Contents
Assets measured on a nonrecurring basis also include impaired loans (nonaccrual loans)
disclosed in Note 5 and loans held for sale. No recent sales have been executed in an orderly
market of manufactured home loan portfolios with comparable product features, credit
characteristics, or performance. Impaired loans are measured using Level 3 inputs that are
calculated using discounted future cash flows. Loans held for sale are measured at the lower of
cost or fair value using Level 1 inputs that consist of commitments on hand from investors. These
loans are held for relatively short periods, typically no more than 45 days. As a result, changes
in loan-specific credit risk are not a significant component of the change in fair value. The cost
of loans held for sale is currently lower than the fair value.
ASC 825, Financial Instruments (ASC 825), requires disclosure of fair value information
about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is
practicable to estimate fair value. Fair value estimates are made as of a specific point in time
based on the characteristics of the financial
instruments and the relevant market information. Where available, quoted market prices are
used. In other cases, fair values are based on estimates using other valuation techniques. These
techniques involve uncertainties and are significantly affected by the assumptions used and the
judgments made regarding risk characteristics of various financial instruments, discount rates,
estimates of future cash flows, future expected loss experience, and other factors. Changes in
assumptions could significantly affect these estimates and the resulting fair values. Derived fair
value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases,
could not be realized in an immediate sale of the instrument. Also, because of differences in
methodologies and assumptions used to estimate fair values, the Companys fair values should not be
compared to those of other companies.
Under ASC 825, fair value estimates are based on existing financial instruments without
attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and
liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value
amounts presented do not represent the underlying market value of the Company.
20. Debtor-In-Possession Note Receivable
On November 29, 2010, Fleetwood Homes, Inc. entered into a DIP Revolving Credit Agreement (the
DIP Agreement) and a Security Agreement (the DIP Security Agreement) with Palm Harbor Florida
and certain of its subsidiaries. Palm Harbor Florida was a manufacturer and marketer of
factory-built housing and a provider of related financing and insurance. Also on November 29, 2010,
Fleetwood Homes newly-formed subsidiary, Palm Harbor Delaware, entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) with Palm Harbor Florida.
Palm Harbor Florida and those of its subsidiaries that were parties to the DIP Agreement and
the Purchase Agreement filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on November 29, 2010. Pursuant to
the terms and conditions of the DIP Agreement, Fleetwood Homes agreed to provide up to $55.0
million for a debtor-in-possession credit facility to finance Palm Harbors reorganization under
chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The DIP loan facility bore interest at 7% per annum. Palm
Harbor Floridas obligations under the DIP Agreement were secured by a first position lien on
substantially all of Palm Harbor Floridas assets. The credit facility was partially used by Palm
Harbor Florida to extinguish its Textron Financial Corporation debt facility and to fund
post-petition operations, commitments to customers, and employee obligations.
On April 23, 2011, the DIP credit facility was retired in conjunction with the closing of the
acquisition of Palm Harbor Florida, discussed further below.
21. Acquisition of Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.
Description of the Acquisition. Fleetwood Homes, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Palm
Harbor Delaware, entered into the Purchase Agreement with Palm Harbor Florida to purchase
substantially all of the assets, and assume specified liabilities, of Palm Harbor Florida, pursuant
to an auction process under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. On March 1, 2011, Palm Harbor
Delaware was selected as the successful bidder in the court auction. The transaction was approved
and a sale order entered by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on March 4, 2011.
25
Table of Contents
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, Palm Harbor Delaware completed the purchase of
the Palm Harbor Florida assets and the assumption of specified liabilities pursuant to the Amended
and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement dated March 1, 2011. The effective date of the transaction
was April 23, 2011 (the Acquisition Date), except for Palm Harbors acquisition of the stock of
Standard Casualty Co., which occurred on June 10, 2011. The aggregate gross purchase price was
$83.9 million and is exclusive of transaction costs, specified liabilities assumed and post-closing
adjustments. Of the purchase price, (i) approximately $45.3 million was used to retire the
debtor-in-possession loan previously made by Fleetwood Homes to Palm Harbor Florida; and (ii) $13.4
million was deposited in escrow pending regulatory approval to transfer the stock of Standard
Casualty Co. to Acquisition Co., at which time the escrowed funds were released to the Palm Harbor
Florida estate. The purchase price was funded by Fleetwood Homes cash on hand, along with
contributions of $36.0 million each from the Company and Third Avenue (see Note 23).
Palm Harbor Delaware acquired five operating manufactured housing production facilities, idled
factories in nine locations, 49 operating retail locations, one office building, real estate, all
related equipment, accounts receivable, customer deposits, inventory, certain trademarks and trade
names, intellectual property, and specified contracts and leases. In addition, as of the
Acquisition Date, Palm Harbor Delaware purchased all of the outstanding shares of CountryPlace
Acceptance Corp., CountryPlace Mortgage, Ltd. and their wholly-owned finance subsidiaries. Palm
Harbor Delaware also acquired all of the outstanding shares of Standard Insurance Agency, Inc. and
its wholly-owned insurance agency subsidiary. On June 7, 2011, regulatory approval of the
acquisition of Standard Casualty Co. was received from the Texas Department of Insurance and on
June 10, 2011 (the SCC Acquisition Date), Palm Harbor Delaware completed the purchase of Standard
Casualty Co. Further, Acquisition Co. assumed certain liabilities of Palm Harbor Florida,
including primarily debt facilities of the finance subsidiaries.
The foregoing descriptions of the DIP Agreement, DIP Security Agreement, and Purchase
Agreement do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the DIP
Agreement, the DIP Security Agreement, and the Purchase Agreement which were filed as Exhibits
10.1, 10.2, and 10.3, respectively, to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on November 29, 2010.
The purchase of the Palm Harbor Florida assets provides further operating capacity, increased
home distribution, and entry into financial and insurance businesses specific to the Companys
industry. The transaction further expanded the Companys geographic reach at a national level by
adding factories and retail locations serving the Northwest, South Central, Southeast and
Mid-Atlantic regions. The Company believes it will have the opportunity to achieve certain
synergies and cost reductions by eliminating redundant processes and overhead.
Acquisition Date Fair Value of Consideration Transferred. The following table details the
Acquisition Date fair value of the consideration transferred to acquire Palm Harbor (in thousands),
of which $74.0 million was in cash:
Acquisition Date | ||||
Fair Value | ||||
Cash advanced to Palm Harbor under DIP financing, credited to
purchase |
$ | 44,117 | ||
Paid-in-kind interest on DIP financing, credited to purchase price |
1,184 | |||
Additional cash consideration |
29,917 | |||
Amounts credited for customer deposits acquired at closing |
8,682 | |||
Total consideration transferred |
$ | 83,900 | ||
Recording of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed. The acquisition has been accounted
for using the acquisition method of accounting which requires, among other things, that assets
acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date.
The following table summarizes the provisional amounts recognized for assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as of the Acquisition Date. Certain estimated values are not yet finalized
(see below) and are subject to change, which could be significant. The allocation of the purchase
price is still preliminary due to the short duration since the Acquisition Date and will be
finalized upon completion of the analysis of the fair values of Palm Harbors assets and specified
liabilities. The Company will finalize the amounts recognized as we obtain the information
necessary to complete the analysis. We expect to finalize these amounts as soon as possible but no
later than one year from the Acquisition Date.
26
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the provisional estimated fair values of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed at the acquisition dates (in thousands):
Initial | Revised | |||||||||||
Estimate | Adjustments (3) | Estimate | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 15,077 | $ | | $ | 15,077 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
5,924 | | 5,924 | |||||||||
Investments |
16,636 | | 16,636 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable (1) |
3,219 | | 3,219 | |||||||||
Inventories |
42,034 | 5,195 | 47,229 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
2,781 | | 2,781 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
13,782 | | 13,782 | |||||||||
Assets held for sale |
9,278 | | 9,278 | |||||||||
Consumer loans receivable |
126,030 | | 126,030 | |||||||||
Deferred income tax assets |
14,532 | | 14,532 | |||||||||
Intangible assets (2) |
15,294 | | 15,294 | |||||||||
Total identifiable assets acquired |
$ | 264,587 | $ | 5,195 | $ | 269,782 | ||||||
Accounts payable of the finance
subsidiaries |
$ | (1,917 | ) | $ | | $ | (1,917 | ) | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
(27,503 | ) | | (27,503 | ) | |||||||
Construction lending line |
(3,974 | ) | | (3,974 | ) | |||||||
Securitized financings |
(101,786 | ) | | (101,786 | ) | |||||||
Debt of the finance subsidiaries |
(19,456 | ) | | (19,456 | ) | |||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
(7,271 | ) | (1,966 | ) | (9,237 | ) | ||||||
Total liabilities assumed |
(161,907 | ) | (1,966 | ) | (163,873 | ) | ||||||
Net identifiable assets acquired |
102,680 | 3,229 | 105,909 | |||||||||
Bargain purchase recognized |
(18,780 | ) | (3,229 | ) | (22,009 | ) | ||||||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 83,900 | $ | | $ | 83,900 | ||||||
(1) | The fair value of accounts receivables acquired is $3,219, with the gross contractual amount being $3,601. The Company determined that $382 would be uncollectible. | |
(2) | Of the $15,294 of acquired intangible assets, $5,450 was assigned to trademarks and trade names and $1,100 was assigned to state insurance licenses, which are considered indefinite-lived intangible assets and are not subject to amortization and $8,744 was assigned to customer-related intangibles, technology and insurance business in force, policies and renewal rights, subject to a weighted-average useful life of approximately 5 years. | |
(3) | Accounting standards require that when the fair value of the net assets acquired exceeds the purchase price, resulting in a bargain purchase gain, the acquirer must reassess the reasonableness of the values assigned to all of the net assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration transferred. The Company has performed such a reassessment and has concluded that the values assigned for the Palm Harbor acquisition are reasonable. In the first quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company originally reported a gain of $18.8 million which has been retrospectively adjusted to $22.0 million as reflected in the table above, representing a $0.23 increase in first quarter and year-to-date basic and diluted earnings per share. The increase in the gain is the result of a $5.2 million revision to the value of retail finished goods. The gain on bargain purchase was not taxable, causing a variation in the customary relationship between income before income taxes and income tax expense for the six month period ended September 30, 2011. |
In connection with the acquisition of Palm Harbor, approximately $30 million was transferred
from Fleetwood Homes to the Palm Harbor Florida estate at closing of the Palm Harbor transaction on
April 23, 2011 and $19.5 million was used to retire a certain debt obligation of the Companys new
subsidiary, CountryPlace, on May 10, 2011 (including payoff of the loan,
prepayment penalty and related legal fees).
27
Table of Contents
During the three and six months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recognized
acquisition-related costs of $120,000 and $864,000, respectively. These costs were expensed as
incurred. During the year ended March 31, 2011, the Company recognized $272,000 of
acquisition-related costs. These costs were recognized in selling, general and administrative
expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. We anticipate additional acquisition-related
costs in fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 related to the purchase of the Palm Harbor assets.
Because the Company purchased Palm Harbor out of bankruptcy, the fair value of identifiable
assets acquired and specified liabilities assumed exceeded the fair value of the consideration
transferred. In accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, the Company consequently
reassessed the recognition and measurement of identifiable assets acquired and specified
liabilities assumed and concluded that the valuation procedures and resulting measures were
appropriate. As a result, the Company recognized a gain on bargain purchase of $22.0 million in
its consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended September 30, 2011.
The recorded amounts are provisional and subject to change primarily as follows:
| Amounts for inventory and property and equipment are pending completion of certain confirmation of physical existence, condition and valuation efforts. |
| Amounts for intangibles, property held for sale, consumer loans receivable, securitized financing obligation, deferred income taxes and accrued liabilities are pending finalization of valuation efforts. |
A single estimate of fair value results from a complex series of judgments about future events
and uncertainties and relies heavily on estimates and assumptions. Judgments used to determine the
estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as
asset lives, can materially impact results of operations.
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, Palm Harbor contributed net sales of $79.9
million and net income of $1.6 million. For
the period from the acquisition dates through September 30, 2011, the amounts included in the
Companys consolidated statement of operations were $132.9 million in net sales and net income of
$22.4 million, which included $22.0 million related to gain on bargain purchase.
Pro Forma Impact of Acquisition (unaudited). The following table presents supplemental
pro forma information as if the acquisition of Palm Harbor had occurred on April 1, 2010 (in
thousands):
Unaudited Pro Forma | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Results | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 130,008 | $ | 117,478 | $ | 243,490 | $ | 241,713 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Cavco common stockholders |
2,299 | (238 | ) | 716 | 10,215 | |||||||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable
to Cavco common stockholders |
0.33 | (0.04 | ) | 0.10 | 1.51 |
28
Table of Contents
The unaudited pro forma consolidated results were prepared using the acquisition method of
accounting and are based on the historical financial information of Cavco and Palm Harbor,
reflecting both Cavco and Palm Harbor results of operations for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The historical financial information has been adjusted
to give effect to the pro forma events that are: (i) directly attributable to the acquisition; (ii)
factually supportable; and (iii) expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. The
unaudited pro forma consolidated results are not necessarily indicative of what our consolidated
results of operations actually would have been had we completed the acquisition on April 1, 2010.
In addition, the unaudited pro forma consolidated results do not purport to project the future
results of operations of the combined company nor do they reflect the expected realization of any
cost savings associated with the acquisition, including the elimination of overhead costs. The
results reflect primarily the following pro forma pre-tax adjustments:
| Reclassification of amounts to conform to Cavcos accounting policies resulted in no impact to net income/(loss). Classification of income statement amounts were not impacted for the three months ended September 30, 2011. For the six months ended September 30, 2011, net sales were grossed up by $1.2 million, cost of sales were grossed up by $1.1 million, SG&A decreased by $428,000, interest expense increased by $44,000, and other income decreased by $445,000. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, net sales were grossed up by $5.4 million, cost of sales were grossed up by $5.5 million, SG&A decreased by $1.1 million, interest expense increased by $174,000, and other income decreased by $931,000. For the six months ended September 30, 2010, net sales were grossed up by $10.5 million, cost of sales were grossed up by $9.5 million, SG&A decreased by $786,000, interest expense increased by $336,000, and other income decreased by $1.5 million. |
| Reclassification of amounts to conform to Cavcos accounting policies for revenue recognition in the retail sales process, resulting in the reclassification of net sales and cost of sales among periods. These revenue recognition adjustments resulted in decreases of net sales and cost of sales of $203,000 and $166,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and increases of $8.0 million and $5.2 million of net sales and cost of sales for the six months ended September 30, 2010, net of adjustments for amounts deferred under Cavcos revenue recognition policy. |
| Elimination of Palm Harbors historical interest expense related to Senior Convertible Notes discharged in bankruptcy, a note payable settled prior to the bankruptcy and a credit agreement that has been terminated and will not be a part of the Companys capitalization going forward. ($239,000 and $4.9 million in the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively). |
| Elimination of $1.9 million of costs incurred and $187,000 of interest income in the six months ended September 30, 2011. These are directly attributable to the bankruptcy and subsequent acquisition, and which do not have a continuing impact on the combined companys operating results. Included in these costs are advisory, legal and regulatory costs incurred by both legacy Cavco and legacy Palm Harbor and income and costs related to the debtor-in-possession financing that has been terminated. |
| Additional amortization expense (approximately $111,000 and $1.7 million for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively) related to the fair value of identifiable intangible assets acquired. |
| Reduction in depreciation expense (approximately $269,000 and $943,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively) related to the fair value adjustment to property, plant and equipment acquired. |
| Elimination of operating activities related to closed manufacturing facilities and retail locations that (i) were not purchased in the transaction or (ii) are held for sale as of the Date of Acquisition. The amounts eliminated included sales of $2.7 million and $19.6 million, cost of sales of $1.3 million and $17.9 million, and SG&A of $558,000 and $6.5 million for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
In addition, all of the above adjustments were adjusted for the applicable tax impact.
22. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest. During fiscal year 2010, the Company and an investment
partner, Third Avenue formed Fleetwood Homes, Inc., with an initial contribution of $35.0 million
each for equal fifty-percent ownership interests. On July 21, 2009, Fleetwood Homes entered into an
asset purchase agreement with Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries to
purchase certain assets and liabilities of its manufactured housing business.
29
Table of Contents
The Company and Third Avenue subsequently contributed $36.0 million each in anticipation of
the purchase of Palm Harbor, which was completed during the first quarter of fiscal year 2012. See
Notes 21 and 23 for further information.
The results of the Fleetwood Homes and Palm Harbor operations have been included in the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes since the respective acquisition dates in
accordance with the provisions of ASC 810. Management has determined that, under GAAP, although
Fleetwood Homes is only fifty-percent owned by the Company, Cavco has a controlling interest and is
required to fully consolidate the results of Fleetwood Homes. The primary factors that contributed
to this determination were Cavcos board and management control of Fleetwood Homes. To that end,
members of Cavcos management hold all of the seats on the board of directors of Fleetwood Homes.
In addition, as part of a management services agreement among Cavco, Fleetwood Homes and Third
Avenue, Cavco provides all executive-level management services to Fleetwood Homes including, among
other things, general management oversight, marketing and customer relations, accounting and cash
management. Third Avenues financial interest in Fleetwood Homes is considered a redeemable
noncontrolling interest, and is designated as such in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Temporary Equity Classification. ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, includes
guidance regarding the classification and measurement of redeemable securities, including a
requirement that equity instruments that are not required to be classified as liabilities be
classified as temporary equity and outside of permanent equity if they are redeemable (i) at a
fixed or determinable price on a fixed or determinable date, (ii) at the option of the holder, or
(iii) upon the occurrence of an event that is not solely within the control of the issuer.
In accordance with the Shareholder Agreement entered into among Fleetwood Homes and its
shareholders (Cavco and Third Avenue), as amended on November 30, 2010 (the Shareholder
Agreement), after the fifth anniversary of the Fleetwood Acquisition Date, (i.e. after August 17,
2014), or at any time after Fleetwood Homes has earned net income of at least $10.0 million in each
of its two most recently completed consecutive fiscal years, Third Avenue has the right (Put
Right) to require Cavco to purchase all of Third Avenues shares of Fleetwood Homes common stock
for an amount based upon a calculation that is designed to approximate fair value. Likewise, Cavco
has the right (Call Right) to require Third Avenue to sell all of its shares of Fleetwood Homes
common stock based on the same timing and calculation as described above for the Put Right. The
conditions for the Put Right or Call Right to become exercisable have not been met as of September
30, 2011.
The purchase price to be payable by Cavco for the purchase of Third Avenues shares pursuant
to the exercise of the Put Right or the Call Right may be settled in cash or shares of common stock
of Cavco. However, the circumstances under which net share settlement would be allowed are not
solely within the control of Cavco. The availability of net share settlement is dependent upon a
number of factors. For example, at the time of such purchase, Cavcos common stock must be listed
on either the NASDAQ or the New York Stock Exchange. In the case of Third Avenues exercise of its
Put Right, Cavco may elect to pay all or a portion of such purchase price in the form of shares of
common stock of Cavco. In the case of Cavcos exercise of its Call Right, Third Avenue may elect to
receive all or a portion of such purchase price in the form of shares of common stock of Cavco. In
addition, net share settlement would not be available if it were to lead to a change of control of
Cavco. If either Cavco or Third Avenue makes such election, the shares of Cavco common stock to be
issued to Third Avenue would be valued based on the average closing price of Cavcos common stock
for the sixty most recent trading days. There is no explicit cap on the maximum number of common
shares that could be potentially issuable upon redemption; therefore, Third Avenues noncontrolling
interest in Fleetwood Homes is classified as a temporary equity mezzanine item between liabilities
and stockholders equity.
The carrying amount is subject to adjustment, after attribution of net income or loss of
Fleetwood Homes, if there are changes in the redemption value at the end of the reporting period.
For the period since the Fleetwood Acquisition Date through September 30, 2011, the Company
determined that the potential redemption value of the redeemable noncontrolling interest did not
exceed its carrying value and no adjustment was needed.
30
Table of Contents
23. Convertible Note Payable
On December 1, 2010, the Company and Third Avenue entered into separate convertible note
payable agreements with their subsidiary, Fleetwood Homes, for $14.0 million each, convertible to
200 shares of
Fleetwood Homes, Inc. common stock at the successful close of the contemplated Palm Harbor
transaction. The convertible notes were subsequently increased by $22.0 million each, convertible
to an additional 314.28 shares, for a total of $36.0 million per note in the fourth quarter of
2011, convertible to 514.28 shares. The convertible notes bore interest of 2.5% per annum.
Concurrent with the successful completion of the acquisition of Palm Harbor Florida, all
outstanding convertible notes were converted to shares of Fleetwood Homes, Inc. on April 23, 2011
and redeemable noncontrolling interest increased by $36.0 million. Any right to interest income was
forfeited by the note holders upon conversion in accordance with the terms of the agreements.
24. Related Party Transactions
At September 30, 2011, Third Avenue Management LLC beneficially owned approximately 12.1% of
Cavco Industries, Inc. outstanding common shares and thus meets the definition of a principal owner
under FASB ASC 850, Related Party Disclosures (ASC 850). Third Avenue Management LLC and Third
Avenue are either directly or indirectly under common control. Third Avenues participation in
ownership of Fleetwood Homes, the Fleetwood Homes transaction, convertible note payable, and the
subsequent Palm Harbor acquisition are therefore considered related party transactions in
accordance with ASC 850.
31
Table of Contents
25. Business Segment Information
The Company operates principally in two segments: (1) factory-built housing, which includes
manufactured housing, modular housing and retail operations and (2) financial services, which
includes finance and insurance. The following table details net sales and (loss) income from
operations by segment for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in
thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Factory-built housing |
$ | 119,686 | $ | 45,888 | $ | 212,526 | $ | 93,393 | ||||||||
Financial services |
10,322 | | 16,463 | | ||||||||||||
$ | 130,008 | $ | 45,888 | $ | 228,989 | $ | 93,393 | |||||||||
Income before income
taxes: |
||||||||||||||||
Factory-built housing |
$ | 4,726 | $ | 3,239 | $ | 2,578 | $ | 5,465 | ||||||||
Financial services |
2,518 | | 3,640 | | ||||||||||||
General corporate
charges |
(2,265 | ) | (1,283 | ) | (3,170 | ) | (2,124 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on bargain
purchase |
| | 22,009 | | ||||||||||||
$ | 4,979 | $ | 1,956 | $ | 25,057 | $ | 3,341 | |||||||||
As of | ||||||||
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Total assets: |
||||||||
Factory-built housing |
$ | 241,167 | $ | 192,866 | ||||
Financial services |
156,461 | | ||||||
Corporate |
35,260 | 76,576 | ||||||
$ | 432,888 | $ | 269,442 | |||||
32
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Introduction
The following should be read in conjunction with the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements and the related Notes that appear in Item 1 of this Report. References to Note or
Notes refer to the Notes to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
Overview
Headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, the Company designs and produces factory-built housing
products primarily distributed through a network of independent and company-owned retailers. We
are the second largest producer of HUD code manufactured homes in the United States, based on
reported wholesale shipments, and marketed under a variety of brand names including Cavco Homes,
Fleetwood Homes, Palm Harbor Homes and Nationwide Homes. The Company is also a leading producer of
park model homes, vacation cabins, modular homes, and systems-built commercial living structures.
Our mortgage subsidiary, CountryPlace, is an approved Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae seller/servicer and
offers conforming mortgages to purchasers of factory-built and site-built homes. Our insurance
subsidiary, Standard, provides property and casualty insurance to manufactured home owners.
Company Growth
On June 30, 2003, Cavco became a stand-alone publicly held company after previously operating
as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Centex Corporation. Cavcos manufactured home factory and retail
operations were historically located in and primarily served the Southwest and South Central United
States housing markets.
On August 17, 2009, the Company and an investment partner, Third Avenue Value Fund (Third
Avenue), acquired certain manufactured housing assets and liabilities of Fleetwood Enterprises,
Inc. through their jointly owned corporation, Fleetwood Homes, Inc. (Fleetwood Homes), pursuant
to an auction process under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The Company and Third Avenue
each own 50% of Fleetwood Homes. Third Avenue Management is an investment advisor to Third Avenue
Value Fund and is a principal stockholder of the Company, as described further in Notes 22 and 24.
On November 29, 2010, Fleetwood Homes, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Palm Harbor Homes,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (Palm Harbor or Palm Harbor Delaware), entered into an agreement
(the Purchase Agreement) with Palm Harbor Homes, Inc., a Florida corporation and certain of its
subsidiaries (Seller) to purchase substantially all of the assets and assume specified
liabilities of Seller, pursuant to an auction process under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code. On April 23, 2011 (the Acquisition Date), Palm Harbor completed the purchase of Sellers
assets and the assumption of specified liabilities, except for Palm Harbors acquisition of the
stock of Standard Casualty Co. (Standard), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Asset Purchase
Agreement dated March 1, 2011. The aggregate gross purchase price was $83.9 million and is
exclusive of transaction costs, specified liabilities assumed and post-closing adjustments. Of the
purchase price, (i) approximately $45.3 million was used to retire a debtor-in-possession loan
previously made by Fleetwood Homes to Seller; and (ii) $13.4 million was deposited in escrow
pending regulatory approval to transfer the stock of Standard to Palm Harbor. The purchase price
was funded by Fleetwood Homes cash on hand along with equal contributions from the Company and
Third Avenue. On June 7, 2011, regulatory approval of the acquisition of Standard was received
from the Texas Department of Insurance and on June 10, 2011, Palm Harbor completed the purchase of
Standard. See Notes 21 and 22 for further information.
Financial information for Fleetwood Homes is included in the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements and related Notes. The Company and Third Avenue have each contributed $71.0 million in
exchange for equal ownership interests in Fleetwood Homes. Although the Company holds a
fifty-percent financial interest in Fleetwood Homes, its results of operations are required to be
fully consolidated. Third Avenues financial interest in Fleetwood Homes is considered a
redeemable noncontrolling interest, and is designated as such in the Consolidated Financial
Statements (see Notes 1 and 22).
33
Table of Contents
The Palm Harbor transaction included five operating manufactured housing production
facilities, idled factories in nine locations, 49 operating retail locations, one office building,
real estate, all related equipment, accounts receivable, customer deposits, inventory, certain
trademarks and trade names, intellectual property, specified contracts and leases, and certain
liabilities including debt facilities of CountryPlace (see Note 21). Palm Harbor purchased all of
the outstanding shares of CountryPlace Acceptance Corp. with its wholly-owned finance subsidiaries
(collectively, CountryPlace) and all of the outstanding shares of Standard. Neither Palm Harbor
nor the Company incurred any debt in connection with the transaction, other than the assumed
CountryPlace debt facilities.
The transaction further expanded the Companys geographic reach at a national level by adding
factories and retail locations serving the Northwest, South Central, Southeast and Mid-Atlantic
regions. The Company believes it will have the opportunity to achieve certain synergies and cost
reductions by eliminating redundant processes and overhead.
Palm Harbors brand recognition is accompanied by its reputation for producing high quality
products with exceptional service after the sale. Strategically, the Palm Harbor transaction
strengthens the Companys position in Texas and surrounding states, which has traditionally been
among the strongest regions of demand for manufactured housing. We also gained a direct presence in
Florida, another historically large market for our industry, which we had not been able to serve
previously. Nationwide Homes, a Palm Harbor brand based in Virginia, builds an innovative and
creative line of larger modular homes, including multi-story, constructed to conform to state and
local building codes. Nationwide Homes sells to local developers and development projects as well
as individuals. Palm Harbor utilizes unique marketing capabilities including internet and other
electronic techniques that may be expanded to other areas of the Company.
The purchase of the Palm Harbor assets also provides the Company entry into financial and
insurance businesses specific to our industry. Standard is domiciled in Texas and is primarily a
specialty writer of manufactured home physical damage insurance. Standard holds insurance licenses
in multiple states; however, a significant portion of its writings occurs in Texas. In addition to
writing direct policies, Standard assumes and cedes reinsurance in the ordinary course of business
(see Note 12).
CountryPlace originates and services factory-built housing mortgage loans in connection with
the retail sale of homes built and sold by the Company and others. The loans are secured by the
underlying homes. CountryPlace services, for itself and others, conforming mortgages,
non-conforming land-home mortgages and manufactured homes chattel loans. CountryPlace is authorized
by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to directly endorse Federal Housing
Administration (FHA) Title I and Title II mortgage insurance, is approved by the Government
National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae) to issue GNMA-insured mortgage-backed
securities, and is authorized to sell mortgages to, and service mortgages for, the Federal National
Mortgage Association (FNMA or Fannie Mae).
We are in the process of expanding our product offerings throughout the combined organization
sharing of product designs, production methods and marketing strategies. The supportive response by
our customer base to the Palm Harbor and Fleetwood Homes acquisitions has been encouraging. We
expect to realize some operating efficiency improvements as a result of our larger size and buying
power although for a period of time, transaction costs and transition related expenses will mask a
portion of such savings. We plan to place a consistent focus on developing synergies among all
operations. Overall, we believe that these expansions will be positive long-term strategic moves
for the Company.
Including the factories listed above, during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the Company
operated fifteen homebuilding facilities located in Phoenix, Arizona; Goodyear, Arizona; Nampa,
Idaho; Woodburn, Oregon; Millersburg, Oregon; Riverside, California; Waco, Texas; Austin, Texas;
Seguin, Texas; Fort Worth, Texas; Lafayette, Tennessee; Douglas, Georgia; Martinsville, Virginia;
Rocky Mount, Virginia and Plant City, Florida. During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the
Company sold an idle production facility in Arabi, Georgia for $495,000. Subsequent to September
30, the Company sold an idled manufacturing facility located at Buda, Texas for $1.3 million.
34
Table of Contents
Cash and cash equivalents of the Company totaled approximately $35.2 million on September 30,
2011. We believe this level of capitalization should provide sufficient resources to the
operations of the Company to endure continuing depressed market conditions and to establish a solid
base for continued growth as circumstances improve.
Industry and Company Outlook
The manufactured housing industry and the Company continue to operate at low production and
shipment levels. According to data provided by the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI), our
industry shipped approximately 32,000 HUD code manufactured homes from January through August 2011
compared to 36,000 for the same period last year. In calendar 2010 and 2009, our industry shipped
approximately 50,000 HUD code manufactured homes annually, the lowest levels since shipment
statistics began to be recorded in 1959. This followed approximately 82,000 homes shipped in
calendar year 2008, which was the previous low. Yearly home shipments from 2003 to 2009 were less
than the annual home shipments for each of the 40 years from 1963 to 2002. For the past 10- and
20-year periods, annual home shipments averaged 117,000 and 207,000, respectively.
General economic challenges including low consumer confidence levels, unemployment and
underemployment, constricted mortgage lending, and overall housing sector weakness need to improve
to spur annual industry and Company shipment levels. Low consumer confidence in the U.S. economy
is not conducive for potential customers to commit to a home purchase. In addition, sales of our
homes have been negatively affected by high unemployment rates and underemployment. Consumer
financing for the retail purchase of manufactured homes needs to become more available before
marked emergence from current lows can occur. Restrictive underwriting guidelines, irregular
appraisal processes, higher interest rates compared to site-built homes, regulatory burdens,
reductions in the number of institutions lending to manufactured home buyers and limited secondary
market availability for manufactured home loans are significant restraints to industry growth. We
are working directly and through industry trade associations to encourage favorable legislative and
government-sponsored enterprise action to address the mortgage financing needs of potential buyers
of affordable homes. Although limited progress has been made in this area, a meaningful positive
impact in the form of increased home orders at our factories has yet to be realized.
Competition from excess site-built home inventory is an issue that is also of concern.
Surplus homes creating the oversupply have various sources. Lender inventories of repossessed
site-built homes are significant and liquidation selling prices are often lower than the current
cost to build a similar home. Some on-site home builders are offering incentives to homebuyers in
order to be competitive with lender foreclosure pricing in their sales areas. The resultant price
points are low enough in many cases to compete with manufactured housing. In turn, competing
manufactured home providers are aggressively pricing their products in efforts to obtain a portion
of the contracted overall housing market. Lower home prices, restrictive underwriting guidelines,
and slow sales activity have also had an adverse impact on the contingency contract process,
wherein potential manufactured home buyers must sell their existing home in order to facilitate the
purchase of a new factory built home.
The Company has operated with low backlogs during the second quarter of fiscal year 2012. The
backlog of sales orders at September 30, 2011 varied among our fifteen factories, but in total was
$20.4 million, or approximately three weeks of current production levels.
Inventory financing for the industrys retail distribution chain continues to be in short
supply. Faced with illiquid capital markets in late calendar year 2008, each of the manufactured
housing sectors remaining inventory finance lenders initiated significant changes, including one
companys announcement to cease lending activities in this industry entirely. The involvement of
others is subject to more restrictive terms that continue to evolve. As most retailers require
financing to maintain inventories of homes, the Company partnered with several lenders to help
provide this type of inventory financing. In connection with certain of these participation
inventory finance programs, the Company provides a significant amount of the funds that independent
financiers lend to distributors to finance retail inventories of our products. In addition, the
Company has entered into direct inventory finance arrangements with distributors of our products
wherein the Company provides all of the inventory finance funds (see Note 6). The Companys
participation in inventory finance has increased the availability of manufactured home inventory
financing to distributors of our
products. We believe that our expanding involvement in the wholesale financing of inventory
is quite helpful to distributors and allows our product with continued exposure to potential
homebuyers in the face of intense competitive forces from other manufactured homebuilders. These
initiatives support the Companys ongoing efforts to expand our distribution base in all of our
markets with existing and new customers.
35
Table of Contents
The two largest manufactured housing consumer demographics, young adults and those who are 55+
years old, are both growing. Household formation is estimated to increase as the young adult
population rises with the growth in the 25 to 34-year-old age bracket, sometimes referred to as the
echo-boom generation. This group is attracted by the affordability, diversity of style choices and
flexibility as to the location of their home. The age 55 and older category is reported to be the
fastest growing segment of the U.S. population. This group is similarly interested in the value
proposition; however, they are also motivated by the low maintenance requirements of factory built
homes, and by the lifestyle offered by planned communities that are specifically designed for
manufactured homes owners in this age group.
The national rental vacancy rate has been reported to be low. Rental housing competes
directly with many of our product offerings, and reductions in rental availability and increases in
the cost of renting may have the effect of shifting interested buyers to other housing alternatives
including manufactured homes.
With manufacturing centers strategically positioned across the nation, we utilize local market
research to design homes to meet the demands of our customers. We have the ability to customize
floor plans and designs to fulfill specific needs. By offering a full range of homes from entry
level models to large custom homes and with the ability to engineer designs in-house, we can
accommodate virtually any customer request. In addition to homes built to the Federal HUD code, we
construct modular homes which conform to state and local codes, park models and cabins, and light
commercial buildings at many of our manufacturing facilities.
Company-wide, we have intensified our efforts to identify niche market opportunities where our
diverse product lines and custom building capabilities provide our company with a competitive
advantage. Green construction processes and environmentally-friendly building materials have long
been a part of our home-building process and their popularity is expected to grow. We utilize
building materials that, combined with our building process, we believe give us a green advantage
over other home builders. Many of the homes we build meet Energy Star standards. Building green
also significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions without sacrificing features, style or comfort.
From bamboo flooring and tankless water heaters to solar-powered homes, our products are diverse
and tailored to a wide range of consumer interests. Innovation in housing design is a forte of the
Company and we continue to introduce new models at competitive price points with expressive
interiors and exteriors that complement home styles in the areas in which they are located.
Prospects are good for the systems-built housing industry, as it provides enhanced quality
homes with better coordination of labor and well-controlled material usage resulting in lower cost
to the consumer, compared to on-site construction methods. Our Company has a demonstrated ability
to operate effectively and efficiently at low levels of capacity utilization characteristic of the
industry recently. In addition, the Company has worked diligently to maintain a solid financial
position. Our balance sheet strength should help us to avoid the liquidity problems faced by many
other companies and enable us to act effectively as market opportunities present themselves.
We were named the 2011 Manufacturer of the Year by MHI, the factory-built home industrys
national trade organization, for the second consecutive year. In addition, both Cavco and Palm
Harbor received several design awards from MHI. These honors are a reflection of our valued
employees, customers and vendors and we appreciate the recognition.
In January 2008, we announced a stock repurchase program. A total of $10 million may be used
to repurchase our outstanding common stock. The repurchases may be made in the open market or in
privately negotiated transactions in compliance with applicable state and federal securities laws
and other legal requirements. The level of repurchase activity is subject to market conditions and
other investment opportunities. The plan does not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of
common stock and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. The repurchase program will be
funded using our available cash. No repurchases have been made under this program to date.
36
Table of Contents
Regulatory Developments
The American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act was enacted in 2008 to provide
assistance by way of legislation for the housing industry, including the manufactured housing
industry. Among other things, the act provides for increased loan limits for chattel (home-only
Title I) loans to $69,678, up 43% from the previous limit of $48,600 set in 1992. New Federal
Housing Administration (FHA) Title I program guidelines became effective on June 1, 2010. On June
10, 2010, the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae) began accepting applications by
lenders for participation as issuers of mortgage backed securities backed by Title I loans
originated under the new program. Ginnie Mae released related pooling guidelines in November 2010.
The issuance of these guidelines provides Ginnie Mae the ability to securitize manufactured home
FHA Title I loans. This will allow lenders to obtain new capital, which can then be used to fund
new loans for our customers. Chattel loans have languished in recent years and these changes are
meant to broaden opportunities for prospective homeowners. However, a meaningful positive impact
in the form of increased home orders at our factories has yet to be realized.
Results of Operations
Three and six months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 2010
Net Sales. Total net sales increased 183.3% to $130.0 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2011 compared to $45.9 million for the comparable quarter last year. For the six
months ended September 30, 2011, sales increased 145.2% to $229.0 million from $93.4 million for the same
period last year. The fiscal year 2012 results include the Palm Harbor operations, which were
acquired on April 23, 2011, and from that date forward are included in the results of fiscal year
2012.
Factory-built housing net sales increased 160.8% to $119.7 million from $45.9 million for the
comparable quarter last year. For the six months ended September 30, 2011, factory-built housing
net sales increased 127.6% to $212.5 million from $93.4 million for the same period last year. The
financial services segment, consisting of CountryPlace and Standard, contributed $10.3 million and
$16.5 million in net sales for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
Gross Profit. Gross profit as a percent of sales increased to 21.7% for the three months
ended September 30, 2011 from 15.6% for the same period last year and increased to 19.4% for the
six months ended September 30, 2011 from 14.6% last year. Including the Palm Harbor operations,
the Companys combined factory-built housing operations sold 2,147 and 3,998 homes during the three and six
months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to 1,236 and 2,552 homes during the
comparable periods last year. While the average sales price per home improved, the improvement in
gross profit was mainly the result of the added Palm Harbor finance and insurance subsidiaries,
which are generally higher-margin businesses.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased 293.3% or $16.1 million to $21.6 million, or 16.6% of net sales, for the three months
ended September 30, 2011 versus $5.5 million or 12.0% of net sales, for the same period last year.
For the six-month period ended September 30, 2010, selling, general and administrative expenses
increased 259.7% or $27.9 million to $38.6 million from $10.7 million last year. The increase is primarily
a result of the addition of the Palm Harbor businesses. Costs related to the acquisition of Palm
Harbor Florida were $120,000 and $864,000 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011,
respectively, and were expensed as incurred.
Income Before Income Taxes. Pre-tax income increased 154.6% to $5.0 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $2.0 million for the comparable quarter last year.
Included in income before income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2011 were $4.7
million from the factory-built housing segment and $2.5 million from the financial services segment, offset by
$2.3 million of general corporate charges. Income before income taxes for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 was $2.0 million including $3.2 million of factory-built housing income
offset in part by $1.3 million of general corporate charges. For the six months ended September
30, 2011, income before income taxes of $25.1 million consisted of $2.6 million from the
factory-built housing segment, $3.6 million from the financial services segment, $3.2 million of
general corporate charges, and $22.0 million of gain on bargain purchase (see Note 21). This compared to
factory-built housing income for the six months ended September 30, 2010 of $5.5 million, offset by
general corporate charges of $2.1 million resulting in pre-tax income of $3.3 million.
37
Table of Contents
Interest Expense. Interest expense of $1.9 million and $3.4 million for the three and six
months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, consisted of debt service on securitization
financings connected to the CountryPlace Mortgage securitized manufactured home loan portfolios.
Other Income. Other income represents interest income earned on inventory finance notes
receivable and debtor-in-possession note receivable. Other income decreased 4.1% to $255,000 for
the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $266,000 during the prior year period.
For the six months ended September 30, 2011, other income increased 37.9% or $169,000 to $615,000
from $446,000 last year.
Income Taxes. For the three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the effective
income tax rate was approximately 36% and 39%, respectively. For the six-month periods ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010, the effective income tax rate was approximately 5% and 39%,
respectively. The gain on bargain purchase was not taxable, causing a variation in the customary relationship between income before income taxes and income tax expense for the six month period ended September 30, 2011.
Net Income. Net income attributable to Cavco stockholders for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2011 was $1.7 million and $11.9 million, respectively, compared to $0.7 million and
$1.2 million for the comparable quarter and six-month period last year, respectively.
See Note 21 for further discussion of the Palm Harbor transaction.
Liquidity and Capital Resources (Dollars in thousands)
We believe that cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2011, together with cash flow from
operations, will be sufficient to fund our operations and provide for growth for the next twelve
months and into the foreseeable future. Because of the Companys sufficient cash position, the
Company has not sought, nor does it have access to, external sources of liquidity, such as a credit facility; however,
depending on our operating results and strategic opportunities, we may need to seek additional or
alternative sources of financing. There can be no assurance that such financing would be available
on satisfactory terms, if at all. If this financing were not available, it could be necessary for
us to reevaluate our long-term operating plans to make more efficient use of our existing capital
resources. The exact nature of any changes to our plans that would be considered depends on various
factors, such as conditions in the factory-built housing industry and general economic conditions
outside of our control.
Projected cash to be provided by or used in operations in the coming year is largely dependent
on sales volume. Operating activities provided $11.6 million of cash during the six months ended
September 30, 2011, compared to requiring the use of $3.6 million during the same period last year.
Cash provided by operating activities during the current period was primarily the result of cash
generated by the new finance subsidiaries including proceeds from sales of consumer loans and
collecting principal payments on consumer loans originated. These increases were supplemented by
increases of accounts payable and accrued liabilities, offset in part by the volume of consumer
loans originated and increases in inventories, prepaid assets and accounts receivable. Cash used
by operating activities during the six months ended September 30, 2010 was primarily the result of
net funding of inventory finance initiatives and decreases in accounts payable, offset in part by
operating income before non-cash charges and collections of trade receivables.
Investing activities required the use of $29.4 million of cash during the six months ended
September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the use of $0.4 million of cash during the same
period last year. Cash used by investing activities in the current period was primarily for funds
to complete the acquisition of the assets and assumption of specified liabilities of Palm Harbor
Homes, Inc. under the asset purchase agreement and debtor-in-possession credit facility, as
discussed in Notes 20 and 21, and capital expenditures in all of our operations. Cash used by
investing activities in the prior year periods were comprised primarily of normal recurring capital
expenditures in all of our factories.
Financing activities required the use of $23.4 million in cash during the six months ended
September 30, 2011, consisting of $19.5 million used to retire a certain debt obligation of the
Companys new subsidiary, CountryPlace Acceptance Corp., on May 10, 2011 (see Note 21), offset in
part by $1.4 million from the issuance of common stock under our stock incentive plans. No
financing activities occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2010.
38
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at September 30, 2011, consisting
of future payments under securitized financings and non-cancelable operating lease agreements. For
additional information related to these obligations, see Notes 11 and 14 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements. This table excludes long-term obligations for which there is no definite
commitment period.
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | 1-3 | 3-5 | After 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 year | Years | Years | Years | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Debt obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Securitized financing 2005-1 (1) (2) |
$ | 62,900 | $ | 8,012 | $ | 13,790 | $ | 11,289 | $ | 29,809 | ||||||||||
Securitized financing 2007-1 (1) (2) |
62,927 | 9,316 | 14,302 | 11,195 | 28,114 | |||||||||||||||
Construction lending line (1) |
4,528 | 4,528 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Commitments for future payments under
noncancelable operating leases |
5,095 | 2,562 | 2,248 | 285 | | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 135,450 | $ | 24,418 | $ | 30,340 | $ | 22,769 | $ | 57,923 | ||||||||||
(1) | Interest is calculated by applying contractual interest rates to month-end balances. | |
(2) | The timing of these estimated payments fluctuates based upon various factors, including loan portfolio prepayment and default rates. |
The following table summarizes our contingent commitments at September 30, 2011, consisting of
contingent repurchase obligations and letters of credit. For additional information related to
these contingent obligations, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contingent Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | 1-3 | 3-5 | After 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 year | Years | Years | Years | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase obligations (1) |
$ | 12,101 | $ | 10,245 | $ | 1,856 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Letters of credit (2) |
7,200 | 7,200 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 19,301 | $ | 17,445 | $ | 1,856 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
(1) | For a complete description of the contingent repurchase obligation, see Critical Accounting Policies Reserve for Repurchase Commitments in the Companys latest annual report. Although the commitments outstanding at September 30, 2011 have a finite life, these commitments are continually replaced as we continue to sell manufactured homes to retailers under repurchase and other recourse agreements with lending institutions which have provided wholesale floor plan financing to retailers. | |
(2) | While the current letters of credit have finite lives, they are subject to renewal based on their underlying requirements. |
Critical Accounting Policies
In Part II, Item 7 of our Form 10-K, under the heading Critical Accounting Policies, we have
provided a discussion of the critical accounting policies that management believes affect its more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial
Statements. In addition, refer to the following accounting policies.
Accretable Yield on Consumer Loans Receivable and Securitized Financings. The Company acquired
consumer loans receivable and securitized financings during the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as a
part of the Palm Harbor transaction. Acquired consumer loans receivable held for investment and
securitized financings were acquired at fair value, which resulted in a discount, and subsequently
are accounted for a manner similar to ASC 310-30 to accrete the discount.
39
Table of Contents
The Company considers expected prepayments and estimates the amount and timing of undiscounted
expected principal, interest and other cash flows for consumer loans receivable held for investment
to determine the expected cash flows on securitized financings and the contractual payments. The
amount of contractual principal and contractual interest payments due on the securitized financings
in excess of all cash flows expected as of the Acquisition Date cannot be accreted into interest
expense (the non-accretable difference). The remaining amount is accreted into interest expense
over the remaining life of the obligation (referred to as accretable yield).
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-20, Receivables (Topic
310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit
Losses, which requires entities to provide new disclosures in their financial statements about
their financing receivables, including credit risk exposures and the allowance for credit losses on
a disaggregated basis. In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, A Creditors Determination of
Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. ASU 2011-02 clarifies when creditors
should classify loan modifications as troubled debt restructurings. In addition, ASU 2011-02
deferred the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings in ASU 2010-20 to
periods beginning after June 15, 2011. As of September 30, 2011, the Company has adopted all of the
aforementioned provisions of ASU 2010-20 and ASU 2011-02.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure
of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. The amendments in this update are
effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The
amendments affected the Companys disclosures of pro forma information surrounding the Palm Harbor
acquisition (see Note 21).
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to
Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The
amendments are effective for public companies for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2011. This update changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements for
measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments
in this update result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in GAAP and
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The Company is currently evaluating the
effect ASU 2011-04 will have on the Companys disclosures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of
Comprehensive Income. The amendments in this update are effective for public companies for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. In this update,
an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net
income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is
required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of
other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount
for comprehensive income. This update eliminates the option to present the components of other
comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders equity. The Company is
currently evaluating the effect ASU 2011-05 will have on the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements and disclosures.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):
Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The amendments in this update are effective for public companies
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. In this update, an entity has the option to
first assess qualitative factors to determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value
of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events
or circumstances, an entity determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of a
reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then it is required to perform the first step of
the two-step impairment test. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then performing the
two-step impairment test is unnecessary. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the effect ASU 2011-08 will have on the Companys disclosures in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
40
Table of Contents
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or the SEC that are
adopted by the Company as of the specified effective dates. Unless otherwise discussed, management
believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a
material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.
Forward-looking Statements
Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our
actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. In addition to the Risk Factors described in Part I,
Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Form 10-K, factors that could affect our results and cause them to
materially differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to:
| We operate in an industry that is currently experiencing a prolonged and significant downturn; |
| Tightened credit standards and curtailed lending activity by home-only lenders have contributed to a constrained consumer financing market, which may continue or could intensify; |
| The availability of wholesale financing for industry retailers is limited due to a reduced number of floor plan lenders and reduced lending limits; |
| Our operating results could be affected by market forces and declining housing demand; |
| We have incurred net losses in certain prior periods and there can be no assurance that we will generate income in the future; |
| A write-off of all or part of our goodwill could adversely affect our operating results and net worth; |
| The cyclical and seasonal nature of the manufactured housing industry causes our revenues and operating results to fluctuate, and we expect this cyclicality and seasonality to continue in the future; |
| Our liquidity and ability to raise capital may be limited; |
| We have contingent repurchase obligations related to wholesale financing provided to industry retailers; |
| The manufactured housing industry is highly competitive, and competition may increase the adverse effects of industry conditions; |
| If we are unable to establish or maintain relationships with independent retailers who sell our homes, our sales could decline; |
| Our results of operations can be adversely affected by labor shortages and the pricing and availability of raw materials; |
| If the manufactured housing industry is not able to secure favorable local zoning ordinances, our sales could decline and our business could be adversely affected; |
| The loss of any of our executive officers could reduce our ability to execute our business strategy and could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations; |
| Certain provisions of our organizational documents could delay or make more difficult a change in control of our Company; |
| Volatility of stock price; |
41
Table of Contents
| Deterioration in economic conditions in general and continued turmoil in the credit markets could reduce our earnings and financial condition; |
| We may not be able to successfully integrate Fleetwood Homes, Palm Harbor, and any future acquisition or attain the anticipated benefits of such acquisition and the acquisition of Fleetwood Homes, Palm Harbor and any future acquisition may adversely impact the Companys liquidity; |
| Our increasing participation in certain wholesale financing programs for the purchase of our products by industry retailers exposes us to additional risk of credit loss, which could adversely impact the Companys liquidity and results of operations; and |
| Our expansion of retail and manufacturing businesses and entry into new lines of business, namely manufactured housing consumer finance and insurance, through the Palm Harbor transaction could expose the Company to additional risks. |
We may make additional written or oral forward-looking statements from time to time in filings
with the SEC or in public news releases or statements. Such additional statements may include, but
are not limited to, projections of revenues, income or loss, capital expenditures, acquisitions,
plans for future operations, financing needs or plans, the impact of inflation and plans relating
to our products or services, as well as assumptions relating to the foregoing.
Statements in this Report on Form 10-Q, including those set forth in this section, may be
considered forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Act of
1934. These forward-looking statements are often identified by words such as estimate,
predict, hope, may, believe, anticipate, plan, expect, require, intend, assume,
and similar words.
Forward-looking statements contained in this Report on Form 10-Q speak only as of the date of
this report or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date of that document.
We do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement contained in this
Report on Form 10-Q or in any document incorporated herein by reference to reflect changed
assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over
time.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and interest
rates. We may from time to time be exposed to interest rate risk inherent in our financial
instruments, but are not currently subject to foreign currency or commodity price risk. We manage
our exposure to these market risks through our regular operating and financing activities.
Our operations are interest rate sensitive. As overall manufactured housing demand can be
adversely affected by increases in interest rates, a significant increase in wholesale or mortgage
interest rates may negatively affect the ability of retailers and home buyers to secure financing.
Higher interest rates could unfavorably impact our revenues, gross margins and net earnings. Our
business is also sensitive to the effects of inflation, particularly with respect to raw material
and transportation costs. We may not be able to offset inflation through increased selling prices.
CountryPlace is exposed to market risk related to the accessibility and terms of long-term
financing of its loans. In the past, CountryPlace accessed the asset-backed securities market to
provide term financing of its chattel and non-conforming mortgage originations. At present,
asset-backed and mortgage-backed securitization markets are effectively closed to CountryPlace and
other manufactured housing lenders. Accordingly, it is unlikely that CountryPlace can continue to
securitize its loan originations as a means to obtain long-term funding. This inability to
continue to securitize its loans caused CountryPlace to discontinue origination of chattel loans
and non-conforming mortgages until other sources of funding are available.
We are also exposed to market risks related to our fixed rate consumer loans receivable
balances. For fixed rate loans receivable, changes in interest rates do not change future earnings
and cash flows from the
receivables. However, changes in interest rates could affect the fair market value of the
loan portfolio. Assuming CountryPlaces level of loans held for investment as of September 30,
2011 is held constant, a 10% increase in average interest rates would decrease the fair value of
CountryPlaces portfolio by approximately $5.5 million.
42
Table of Contents
In originating loans for sale, CountryPlace issues interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) to
prospective borrowers and third-party originators. These IRLCs represent an agreement to extend
credit to a loan applicant, or an agreement to purchase a loan from a third-party originator,
whereby the interest rate on the loan is set prior to loan closing or sale. These IRLCs bind
CountryPlace to fund the approved loan at the specified rate regardless of whether interest rates
or market prices for similar loans have changed between the commitment date and the closing date.
As such, outstanding IRLCs are subject to interest rate risk and related loan sale price risk
during the period from the date of the IRLC through the earlier of the loan sale date or IRLC
expiration date. The loan commitments generally range between 30 and 180 days; however, borrowers
are not obligated to close the related loans. As a result, CountryPlace is subject to fallout risk
related to IRLCs, which is realized if approved borrowers choose not to close on the loans within
the terms of the IRLCs. Assuming CountryPlaces level of IRLCs is held constant, a 1% increase in
average interest rates would increase the fair value of CountryPlaces obligations by approximately
$0.4 million.
Certain of our inventory finance notes receivable and securitized financings have fixed
interest rates as well. For fixed rate instruments, changes in interest rates do not change future
earnings and cash flows from the receivables. However, changes in interest rates could affect the
fair market value of the loan portfolio.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Exchange Act) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this
report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b) Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We completed the Palm Harbor transaction during the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Palm Harbor operates under its own set of systems and internal
controls. We are separately maintaining Palm Harbors systems and internal controls until we are able to incorporate them into our own systems and control environment. We currently expect to complete the integration of Palm Harbors operation
into our systems and control environment during fiscal year 2013.
Other than as described above, there have been no other changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2011, which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
43
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
Information regarding reportable legal proceedings is contained in Part I, Item 3, Legal
Proceedings, in our Form 10-K. The following describes legal proceedings, if any, that became
reportable during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, and, if applicable, amends and restates
descriptions of previously reported legal proceedings in which there have been material
developments during such quarter.
We are party to certain legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course and are incidental
to our business. Certain of the claims pending against us in these proceedings allege, among other
things, breach of contract and warranty, product liability, construction defect and personal
injury. Although litigation is inherently uncertain, based on past experience and the information
currently available, management does not believe that the currently pending and threatened
litigation or claims will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial
position, liquidity or results of operations. However, future events or circumstances currently
unknown to management will determine whether the resolution of pending or threatened litigation or
claims will ultimately have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity or
results of operations in any future reporting periods.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our Form 10-K, which could materially
affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in this Report and
in our Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not
currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 5. | Other Information |
On November 3, 2011, after considering the results of the stockholder advisory vote and other
factors, the Companys Board of Directors determined that the Company will hold an annual advisory
vote on the compensation of the Companys named executive officers until the next required advisory
vote on the frequency of stockholder votes on the compensation of the Companys named executive
officers or the Board of Directors otherwise determines that a different frequency for such
advisory votes is appropriate.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
See Exhibit Index.
All other items required under Part II are omitted because they are not applicable.
44
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Cavco Industries, Inc.
|
||||
Registrant | ||||
November 8, 2011
|
/s/ Joseph H. Stegmayer
|
|||
Chairman, President and | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
(Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
November 8, 2011
|
/s/ Daniel L. Urness
|
|||
Vice President, Treasurer and | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
45
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Exhibit | |||
3.1 | (1) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation |
||
3.2 | (2) | Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation |
||
3.3 | (3) | Amended and Restated Bylaws |
||
10.1 | (4) | Amendment to the Cavco Industries, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan |
||
10.2 | (5) | First Amendment to the Cavco Industries, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan |
||
10.3 | (6) | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Incentive Plan for Fiscal Year 2011 |
||
10.4 | (6) | Chief Executive Officer Incentive Plan for Fiscal Year 2011 |
||
10.5 | (7) | Debtor-In-Possession Revolving Credit Agreement dated November 29, 2010 |
||
10.6 | (8) | Security Agreement dated November 29, 2010 |
||
10.7 | (9) | Asset Purchase Agreement dated November 29, 2010 |
||
10.8 | (10) | Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 29, 2010, between Joseph H.
Stegmayer and Cavco |
||
10.9 | (11) | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated June 30, 2011, by and between
Cavco Industries, Inc. and Joseph H. Stegmayer |
||
31.1 | * | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
||
31.2 | * | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
||
32 | ** | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 | |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 | |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 | |
(4) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 | |
(5) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 | |
(6) | Incorporated by reference to the Periodic Report on Form 8-K filed on May 27, 2010 | |
(7) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Periodic Report on Form 8-K filed on November 29, 2010 | |
(8) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Periodic Report on Form 8-K filed on November 29, 2010 | |
(9) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Periodic Report on Form 8-K filed on November 29, 2010 | |
(10) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 9, 2011 | |
(11) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Periodic Report on Form 8-K filed on July 5, 2011 | |
* | Filed herewith | |
** | Furnished herewith |
46