CHASE CORP - Annual Report: 2014 (Form 10-K)

Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents
ITEM 8—FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014

Commission File Number: 1-9852

CHASE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

26 Summer Street, Bridgewater, Massachusetts 02324
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)

(508) 819-4200
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

         Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None

         Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). YES o    NO ý

         Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. YES o    NO ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ý    NO o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ý    NO o

         Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

         Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

         Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o    NO ý

         The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of February 28, 2014 (the last business day of the registrant's second quarter of fiscal 2014), was approximately $203,473,000.

         As of October 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding 9,129,427 shares of common stock, $.10 par value, which is its only class of common stock.

Documents Incorporated By Reference:

         Portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is expected to be filed within 120 days after the registrant's fiscal year ended August 31, 2014, are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.

Table of Contents

CHASE CORPORATION

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

For the Year Ended August 31, 2014

1

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1—BUSINESS

Primary Operating Divisions and Facilities and Industry Segment

        Chase Corporation (the "Company," "Chase," "we," or "us"), founded in 1946, is a leading manufacturer of protective materials for high reliability applications. Our strategy is to maximize the performance of our core businesses and brands while seeking future opportunities through strategic acquisitions. We are organized into two operating segments, an Industrial Materials segment and a Construction Materials segment. The basis for our segmentation is distinguished by the nature of the products we manufacture and how they are delivered to their respective markets. The Industrial Materials segment represents our specified products which are used in or integrated into another company's product with demand dependent upon general economic conditions. The Construction Materials segment reflects our construction project oriented product offerings which are primarily sold and used as "Chase" branded products in final form. Our manufacturing facilities are distinct to their respective segments with the exception of our O'Hara Township, PA and Blawnox, PA facilities, which produce products related to both operating segments. A summary of our operating structure as of August 31, 2014 is as follows:

INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS SEGMENT

2

Table of Contents

3

Table of Contents

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SEGMENT

4

Table of Contents

Other Business Developments

        On October 31, 2014, we purchased the 50% non-controlling membership interest of NEPTCO JV LLC (the "JV") that had been owned by our now-former joint venture partner, an otherwise unrelated party. The purchase consideration due at the time of closing was not deemed to be material to Chase, and is subject to certain contingent adjustments based on certain future events related to the JV. We also do not believe that these contingent adjustments will be material to us. The purchase was funded entirely with available cash on hand. Because of our controlling financial interest, the JV's assets, liabilities and results of operations have been consolidated within our consolidated financial statements since June 27, 2012, the date Chase acquired NEPTCO. Given our 100% ownership as of October 31, 2014, in subsequent periods we will continue to fully consolidate assets, liabilities and results of operations, but will no longer record an offsetting amount for a non-controlling interest.

Products and Markets

        Our principal products are specialty tapes, laminates, sealants and coatings that are sold by our salespeople, manufacturers' representatives and distributors. In our Industrial Materials segment, these products consist of:

(i)

insulating and conducting materials for the manufacture of electrical and telephone wire and cable, electrical splicing, and terminating and repair tapes, which are marketed to wire and cable manufacturers;



(ii)

laminated film foils, composite strength elements, anti-static packaging tape and pulling tapes for the electronics and cable industries;



(iii)

moisture protective coatings, which are sold to the electronics industry including circuitry used in automobiles and home appliances;



(iv)

laminated durable papers, including laminated paper with an inner security barrier used in personal and mail-stream privacy protection, which are sold primarily to the envelope converting and commercial printing industries;



(v)

pulling and detection tapes used in the installation, measurement and location of fiber optic cables, water and natural gas lines, and power, data, and video cables for commercial buildings;



(vi)

cover tapes with reliable adhesive and anti-static properties essential to delivering semiconductor components via tape and reel packaging; and



(vii)

flexible, rigid and semi-rigid fiber optic strength elements designed to allow fiber optic cables to withstand mechanical and environmental strain and stress.

        In our Construction Materials segment, these products consist of:

(i)

protective pipe coating tapes and other protectants for valves, regulators, casings, joints, metals, concrete and wood, which are sold to oil companies, gas utilities and pipeline companies;



(ii)

protectants for highway bridge deck metal supported surfaces, which are sold to municipal transportation authorities;



(iii)

fluid applied coating and lining systems for use in the water and wastewater industry; and



(iv)

expansion and control joint systems designed for roads, bridges, stadiums and airport runways.

        There is some seasonality in selling products into the construction market as higher demand is often experienced when temperatures are warmer in most of North America (April through October) with less demand occurring when temperatures are colder (typically our second fiscal quarter). We did not introduce any new products requiring an investment of a material amount of our assets during fiscal year 2014.

Employees

        As of October 31, 2014, we employed approximately 667 people (including union employees). We consider our employee relations to be good. In the U.S., we offer our employees a wide array of company-paid benefits, which we believe are competitive relative to others in our industry. In our operations outside the U.S., we offer benefits that may vary from those offered to our U.S. employees due to customary local practices and statutory requirements.

5

Table of Contents

Backlog, Customers and Competition

        As of October 31, 2014, the backlog of customer orders believed to be firm was approximately $15,453,000. This compared with a backlog of $16,546,000 as of October 31, 2013. The decrease in backlog from the prior year amount is primarily due to an overall decrease in order activity across our North America pipeline and construction product lines. During fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, no customer accounted for more than 10% of sales. No material portion of our business is subject to renegotiation or termination of profits or contracts at the election of the United States Federal Government.

        There are other companies that manufacture or sell products and services similar to those made and sold by us. Many of those companies are larger and have greater financial resources than we have. We compete principally on the basis of technical performance, service reliability, quality and price.

Raw Materials

        We obtain raw materials from a wide variety of suppliers with alternative sources of most essential materials available within reasonable lead times.

Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises and Concessions

        We own the following trademarks that we believe are of material importance to our business: Chase Corporation®, C-Spray (Logo), a trademark used in conjunction with most of the Company's business segment and product line marketing material and communications; HumiSeal®, a trademark for moisture protective coatings sold to the electronics industry; Chase & Sons®, a trademark for barrier and insulating tapes sold to the wire and cable industry; Chase BLH2OCK®, a trademark for a water blocking compound sold to the wire and cable industry; Rosphalt50®, a trademark for an asphalt additive used predominantly on bridge decks for waterproofing protection; PaperTyger®, a trademark for laminated durable papers sold to the envelope converting and commercial printing industries; Tapecoat®, a trademark for corrosion preventative surface coatings and primers; Maflowrap®, a trademark for anti-corrosive tapes incorporating self-adhesive mastic or rubber backed strips, made of plastic materials; Royston®, a trademark for corrosion inhibiting coating composition for use on pipes; Ceva®, a trademark for epoxy pastes/gels/mortars and elastomeric concrete used in the construction industry; CIM® trademarks for fluid applied coating and lining systems used in the water and wastewater industry; ServiWrap® trademarks for pipeline protection tapes, coatings and accessories; NEPTCO®, a trademark used in conjunction with most of NEPTCO's business and product line marketing material and communications; NEPTAPE®, a trademark for coated shielding and insulation materials used in the wire and cable industry; Muletape®, a trademark for pulling and installation tapes sold to the telecommunications industry; and Tracesafe®, a trademark for detection tapes sold to the water and gas industry. We do not have any other material trademarks, licenses, franchises, or concessions. While we do hold various patents, at this time, we do not believe that they are material to the success of our business. We did file one new patent application during this fiscal year under our PaperTyger® product line which is a paper/plastic laminate and electromagnetic shielding material used to protect against identity and property theft.

Working Capital

        We fund our business operations through a combination of available cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and cash flows generated from operations. In addition, our revolving credit facility is available for additional working capital needs or investment opportunities. We have historically funded acquisitions through additional borrowings and term loans from our bank lenders.

Research and Development

        Approximately $2,599,000, $3,395,000 and $2,958,000 was spent for Company-sponsored research and development during fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Research and development decreased by $796,000 in fiscal 2014 primarily due to a reduction in the use of outside services and our continued emphasis on streamlining processes.

Available Information

        Chase maintains a website at http://www.chasecorp.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to

6

Table of Contents

section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as section 16 reports on Form 3, 4, or 5, are available free of charge on this site as soon as is reasonably practicable after they are filed or furnished with the SEC. Our Code of Conduct and Ethics and the charters for the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation and Management Development Committee of our Board of Directors are also available on our Internet site. The Code of Conduct and Ethics and charters are also available in print to any shareholder upon request. Requests for such documents should be directed to Paula Myers, Shareholder and Investor Relations Department, at 26 Summer Street, Bridgewater, Massachusetts 02324. Our Internet site and the information contained on it or connected to it are not part of or incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K. Our filings with the SEC are also available on the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov.

Financial Information Regarding Segment and Geographic Areas

        Please see Notes 11 and 12 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for financial information about the Company's operating segments and domestic and foreign operations for each of the last three fiscal years.

ITEM 1A—RISK FACTORS

        The following risk factors should be read carefully in connection with evaluating our business and the forward-looking information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We feel that any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our business, operations, industry, financial position or our future financial performance. While we believe that we have identified and discussed below the key risk factors affecting our business, there may be additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known or that are not currently believed to be significant that may adversely affect our business, operations, industry, financial position and financial performance in the future.

We currently operate in mature markets where increases or decreases in market share could be significant.

        Our sales and net income are largely dependent on sales from a consistent and well established customer base. Organic growth opportunities are minimal; however, we have used and will continue to use strategic acquisitions as a means to build and grow the business. In this business environment, increases or decreases in market share could have a material effect on our business condition or results of operation. We face intense competition from a diverse range of competitors, including operating divisions of companies much larger and with far greater resources than we have. If we are unable to maintain our market share, our business could suffer.

Our business strategy includes the pursuit of strategic acquisitions, which may not be successful if they happen at all.

        From time to time, we engage in discussions with potential target companies concerning potential acquisitions. In executing our acquisition strategy, we may be unable to identify suitable acquisition candidates. In addition, we may face competition from other companies for acquisition candidates, making it more difficult to acquire suitable companies on favorable terms.

        Even if we do identify a suitable acquisition target and are able to negotiate and close a transaction, the integration of an acquired business into our operations involves numerous risks, including potential difficulties in integrating an acquired company's product line with ours; the diversion of our resources and management's attention from other business concerns; the potential loss of key employees; limitations imposed by antitrust or merger control laws in the United States or other jurisdictions; risks associated with entering a new geographical or product market; and the day-to-day management of a larger and more diverse combined company. In June 2012, for example, we completed the acquisition of NEPTCO Incorporated, which represented approximately 39% of our consolidated total assets as of the end of fiscal 2012, making it the largest acquisition in the Company's history.

        We may not realize the synergies, operating efficiencies, market position or revenue growth we anticipate from acquisitions and our failure to effectively manage the above risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, growth prospects and financial performance.

7

Table of Contents

Our results of operations could be adversely affected by uncertain economic and political conditions and the effects of these conditions on our customers' businesses and levels of business activity.

        Global economic and political conditions can affect the businesses of our customers and the markets they serve. A severe or prolonged economic downturn or a negative or uncertain political climate could adversely affect the levels of business activity of our customers and the industries they serve, including the automotive, housing, construction, pipeline, energy, transportation infrastructure and electronics industries. This may reduce demand for our products or depress pricing of those products, either of which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Changes in global economic conditions could also shift demand to products for which we do not have competitive advantages, and this could negatively affect the amount of business that we are able to obtain. In addition, if we are unable to successfully anticipate changing economic and political conditions, we may be unable to effectively plan for and respond to those changes and our business could be negatively affected.

General economic factors, domestically and internationally, may also adversely affect our financial performance through increased raw material costs or other expenses and by making access to capital more difficult.

        The cumulative effect of higher interest rates, energy costs, inflation, levels of unemployment, healthcare costs, unsettled financial markets, and other economic factors could adversely affect our financial condition by increasing our manufacturing costs and other expenses at the same time that our customers may be scaling back demand for our products. Prices of certain commodity products, including oil and petroleum-based products, are historically volatile and are subject to fluctuations arising from changes in domestic and international supply and demand, labor costs, competition, weather events, market speculation, government regulations and periodic delays in delivery. Rapid and significant changes in commodity prices may affect our sales and profit margins. These factors can increase our merchandise costs and/or selling, general and administrative expenses, and otherwise adversely affect our operating results. Disruptions in the credit markets may limit our ability to access debt capital for use in acquisitions or other purposes on advantageous terms or at all. If we are unable to manage our expenses in response to general economic conditions and margin pressures, or if we are unable to obtain capital for strategic acquisitions or other needs, then our results of operations would be negatively affected.

Fluctuations in the supply and prices of raw materials may negatively impact our financial results.

        We obtain raw materials needed to manufacture our products from a number of suppliers. Many of these raw materials are petroleum-based derivatives. Under normal market conditions, these materials are generally available on the open market and from a variety of producers. From time to time, however, the prices and availability of these raw materials fluctuate, which could impair our ability to procure necessary materials, or increase the cost of manufacturing our products. If the prices of raw materials increase, and we are unable to pass these increases on to our customers, we could experience reduced profit margins.

If our products fail to perform as expected, or if we experience product recalls, we could incur significant and unexpected costs and lose existing and future business.

        Our products are complex and could have defects or errors presently unknown to us, which may give rise to claims against us, diminish our brands or divert our resources from other purposes. Despite testing, new and existing products could contain defects and errors and may in the future contain manufacturing or design defects, errors or performance problems when first introduced, or even after these products have been used by our customers for a period of time. These problems could result in expensive and time-consuming design modifications or warranty charges, changes to our manufacturing processes, product recalls, significant increases in our maintenance costs, or exposure to liability for damages, any of which may result in substantial and unexpected expenditures, require significant management attention, damage our reputation and customer relationships, and adversely affect our business, our operating results and our cash flow.

We are dependent on key personnel.

        We depend significantly on our executive officers including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Peter R. Chase, and our President and Chief Operating Officer, Adam P. Chase, and on other key employees. The loss of the services of any of these key employees could have a material impact on our business and results of operations. In addition, our acquisition strategy will require that we attract, motivate and retain additional skilled and experienced

8

Table of Contents

personnel. The inability to satisfy such requirements could have a negative impact on our ability to remain competitive in the future. We have recently announced a transition plan under which we expect Peter R. Chase to become Executive Chairman and Adam P. Chase to become Chief Executive Officer, subject to board approval at the time, effective with our annual meeting of shareholders in 2015.

If we cannot successfully manage the unique challenges presented by international markets, we may not be successful in expanding our international operations.

        Our strategy includes expansion of our operations in existing and new international markets by selective acquisitions and strategic alliances. Our ability to successfully execute our strategy in international markets is affected by many of the same operational risks we face in expanding our U.S. operations. In addition, our international expansion may be adversely affected by our ability to identify and gain access to local suppliers as well as by local laws and customs, legal and regulatory constraints, political and economic conditions and currency regulations of the countries or regions in which we currently operate or intend to operate in the future. Risks inherent in our international operations also include, among others, the costs and difficulties of managing international operations, adverse tax consequences and greater difficulty in enforcing intellectual property rights. Additionally, foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations may have an impact on future costs or on future cash flows from our international operations.

We may experience difficulties in the redesign and consolidation of our manufacturing facilities which could impact shipments to customers, product quality, and our ability to realize cost savings.

        We currently have several ongoing projects to streamline our manufacturing operations, which include the redesign and consolidation of certain manufacturing facilities. We anticipate a reduction of overhead costs as a result of these projects, to the extent that we can effectively leverage assets, personnel, and business processes in the transition of production among manufacturing facilities. However, uncertainty is inherent within the facility redesign and consolidation process, and unforeseen circumstances could offset the anticipated benefits, disrupt service to customers, and impact product quality.

Financial market performance may have a material adverse effect on our pension plan assets and require additional funding requirements.

        Significant and sustained declines in the financial markets may have a material adverse effect on the fair market value of the assets of our pension plans. While these pension plan assets are considered non-financial assets since they are not carried on our balance sheet, the fair market valuation of these assets could impact our funding requirements, funded status or net periodic pension cost. Any significant and sustained declines in the fair market value of these pension assets could require us to increase our funding requirements, which would have an impact on our cash flow, and could also lead to additional pension expense.

Regulations related to conflict minerals could adversely impact our business.

        The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act contains provisions to improve transparency and accountability concerning the supply of certain minerals, known as "conflict minerals" (tin, tungsten, tantalum, and gold). As a result, the SEC has adopted annual disclosure and reporting requirements concerning the supply chain for those public companies that use conflict minerals that are necessary to the functionality or production of their products. These requirements require companies to perform certain reasonable country of origin and due diligence exercises to determine if any of their sourced conflict minerals originated from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. We filed our first report under these rules in May 2014, to cover calendar year 2013, and anticipate filing reports on this matter on or prior to the annual May 31 due date going forward.

        There are costs associated with complying with these annual disclosure requirements, including ongoing due diligence to determine the sources of conflict minerals used in our products and other potential changes to products, processes or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities. Continued adherence to these rules, and Chase's desire to obtain and maintain a DRC Conflict Free status, could adversely affect the sourcing, supply and pricing of materials used in our products. As there may be only a limited number of suppliers offering conflict free conflict minerals, we cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain necessary conflict minerals from such suppliers in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Also, we may face reputational challenges if we determine that certain of our products contain minerals not determined to be conflict free or if we are unable to

9

Table of Contents

sufficiently verify the origins for all conflict minerals used in our products through the procedures we may implement. In addition, some of our customers may choose to disqualify us as a supplier if we are unable to verify that any conflict minerals used in our products are not sourced from the covered countries or are not done so by conflict free certified refiners and smelters.

Failure or compromise of security with respect to an operating or information system or portable electronic device could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition or the effectiveness of our internal controls over operations and financial reporting.

        We are highly dependent on automated systems to record and process our daily transactions and certain other components of our financial statements. We could experience a failure of one or more of these systems, or a compromise of our security due to technical system flaws, data input or record-keeping errors, or tampering or manipulation of our systems by employees or unauthorized third parties. Information security risks also exist with respect to the use of portable electronic devices, such as laptops and smartphones, which are particularly vulnerable to loss and theft. We may also be subject to disruptions of any of these systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond our control (for example, natural disasters, acts of terrorism, epidemics, computer viruses, and electrical/telecommunications outages). All of these risks are also applicable wherever we rely on outside vendors to provide services. Operating system failures, disruptions, or the compromise of security with respect to operating systems or portable electronic devices could subject us to liability claims, harm our reputation, interrupt our operations, or adversely affect our internal control over financial reporting, business, results from operations, financial condition or cash flow.

ITEM 1B—UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

        Not applicable

10

Table of Contents

ITEM 2—PROPERTIES

        We own and lease office and manufacturing properties as outlined in the table below.

        The above facilities range in age from new to about 100 years, are generally in good condition and, in the opinion of management, adequate and suitable for present operations. We also own equipment and machinery that is in good repair and, in the opinion of management, adequate and suitable for present operations. We could significantly add to our capacity by increasing shift operations. Availability of machine hours through additional shifts would provide expansion of current product volume without significant additional capital investment.

11

Table of Contents

ITEM 3—LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

        We are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. Although we do not expect that the outcome in any of these matters, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cashflows, litigation is inherently unpredictable. Therefore, judgments could be rendered or settlements entered, that could adversely affect our operating results or cash flows in a particular period. We routinely assess all of our litigation and threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately incurring a liability, and record our best estimate of the ultimate loss in situations where we assess the likelihood of loss as probable.

ITEM 4—MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

        Not applicable.

ITEM 4A—EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

        The following table sets forth information concerning our Executive Officers as of October 31, 2014. Each of our Executive Officers is selected by our Board of Directors and holds office until his successor is elected and qualified.

        In October 2014, Chase Corporation announced that as part of the Company's succession plan, effective with its annual meeting of shareholders scheduled for February 3, 2015, and subject to final board approval at that time, Adam P. Chase, its current President and Chief Operating Officer, will be named Chief Executive Officer and Peter R. Chase, its current Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, will be named Executive Chairman.

12

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5—MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

        Our common stock is traded on the NYSE MKT under the symbol CCF. As of October 31, 2014, there were 380 shareholders of record of our Common Stock and we believe that there were approximately 3,394 beneficial shareholders who held shares in nominee name. On that date, the closing price of our common stock was $35.87 per share as reported by the NYSE MKT.

        The following table sets forth the high and low daily sales prices for our common stock as reported by the NYSE MKT for each quarter in the fiscal years ended August 31, 2014 and 2013:

        Single annual cash dividend payments were declared and scheduled to be paid subsequent to year end in the amounts of $0.60, $0.45, and $0.40 per common share, for the years ended August 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Certain of our borrowing facilities contain financial covenants which may have the effect of limiting the amount of dividends that we can pay.

Comparative Stock Performance

        The following line graph compares the yearly percentage change in our cumulative total shareholder return on the Common Stock for the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total return on the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index (the "S&P 500 Index"), and a composite peer index that is weighted by market equity capitalization (the "Peer Group Index"). The companies included in the Peer Group Index are American Biltrite Inc., Circor International Inc., H.B. Fuller Company, Quaker Chemical Corporation and RPM International, Inc. Cumulative total returns are calculated assuming that $100 was invested on August 31, 2009 in each of the Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index and the Peer Group Index, and that all dividends were reinvested.

        The information under the caption "Comparative Stock Performance" above is not deemed to be "filed" as part of this Annual Report, and is not subject to the liability provisions of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such information will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing we make under the Securities Act of 1933 unless we explicitly incorporate it into such a filing at the time.

13

Table of Contents

ITEM 6—SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

        The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with "Item 7—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."

        The Electronic Manufacturing Services business was sold in June 2010 and the financial results of this previously reported segment are classified as discontinued operations in the above financial data schedule.

14

Table of Contents

ITEM 7—MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        The following discussion provides an analysis of our financial condition and results of operations and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Selected Relationships within the Consolidated Statements of Operations

Overview

        Continued strong demand for many of our product areas as well as favorable sales mix contributed to increased revenues and net income over the prior year results. Our strategic diversification was also a contributing factor as several product lines in both of our segments exceeded prior year revenues, offsetting shortfalls from others, which led to revenue growth for the fiscal year. Additionally, our ongoing efforts with production facility consolidation, efficiency improvements and streamlining overhead costs have improved our profitability. The sale of the Company's Insulfab product line in October 2013 significantly contributed to earnings and cash flows earlier in fiscal 2014.

        Revenues from the Industrial Materials segment exceeded prior year results primarily due to strong demand in Europe and Asia for our electronic coatings products, as well as increased sales of our pulling and detection tapes, electronic materials, and power cable products. These increased sales were partially offset by a reduction in demand for our specialty materials products and fiber optic cable component products from our joint venture business.

        Revenues from the Construction Materials segment surpassed the prior year primarily driven by increased demand for pipeline coatings products produced at our Rye, UK facility due to Middle East project demand, as well as increased sales of our coating and lining system products over the final half of the fiscal year. These increases were partially offset by decreased sales of our private label products and bridge & highway construction products due to the impact of the harsh winter across the U.S. on these businesses.

        In the upcoming fiscal year, we will continue with our global ERP system implementation which was initiated in fiscal 2013 and is scheduled for full company-wide deployment by the end of December 2014. Additionally, consolidation efforts will remain a priority and other key strategies will include a focus on our marketing and product development efforts along with a continued emphasis on identifying potential acquisition targets. Our balance sheet

15

Table of Contents

continues to remain strong, with cash on hand of $53.2 million and a current ratio of 3.5. Our $15.0 million line of credit is fully available, while the balance of our term debt is $58.8 million.

        The Company has two reportable segments summarized below:

16

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Revenues and Operating Profit by Segment are as follows:

Total Revenues

        Total revenues in fiscal 2014 increased $7,944,000 or 4% to $224,006,000 from $216,062,000 in the prior year. Revenues in our Industrial Materials segment increased $6,183,000 or 4% to $169,657,000 for the year ended August 31, 2014 compared to $163,474,000 in fiscal 2013. The increase in revenues from our Industrial Materials segment in fiscal 2014 was primarily due to increased sales of: (a) $3,465,000 from our global electronic coatings product line primarily due to higher sales into Europe and Asia; (b) $2,015,000 from our pulling and detection tape products; (c) $1,447,000 from electronic cover tapes; and (d) $1,072,000 from our wire and cable products that are used in energy-related applications. These increases were partially offset by decreased sales of $975,000 from our specialty materials products as well as lower sales of $520,000 from our joint venture fiber optic cable products.

        Revenues from our Construction Materials segment increased $1,761,000 or 3% to $54,349,000 for the year ended August 31, 2014 compared to $52,588,000 for fiscal 2013. The increased sales from our Construction Materials segment in fiscal 2014 was primarily due to increased sales of $5,563,000 in pipeline products produced

17

Table of Contents

at our Rye, UK facility as a result of higher project related demands in the Middle East. These increases were partially offset by decreased sales of $2,032,000 from our bridge and highway products as well as lower sales of $1,733,000 from our private label products as both experienced slower demand earlier this fiscal year during the winter and spring months due to the impact of the harsh winter across the U.S. on these businesses.

        Royalties and commissions in the Industrial Materials segment were $2,972,000, $2,414,000 and $2,425,000 for the years ended August 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in royalties and commissions in fiscal 2014 over both fiscal 2013 and 2012 was due to increased sales of electronic coating products by our licensed manufacturer in Asia.

        Export sales from domestic operations to unaffiliated third parties were $21,212,000, $22,827,000 and $21,204,000 for the years ended August 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Export sales had a slight decline in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 primarily due to the prior year's inclusion of some large export shipments of our C.I.M. products that were not repeated in fiscal 2014. We do not anticipate any material changes to export sales during fiscal 2015.

        Total revenues in fiscal 2013 increased $67,143,000 or 45% to $216,062,000 from $148,919,000 in the prior year. Revenues in our Industrial Materials segment increased $67,486,000 or 70% to $163,474,000 for the year ended August 31, 2013 compared to $95,988,000 in fiscal 2012. The increase in revenues from our Industrial Materials segment in fiscal 2013 was primarily due to increased sales of: (a) $63,452,000 from NEPTCO product offerings which we acquired in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012; (b) $3,779,000 from our global electronic coatings product line; and (c) $2,253,000 from our laminated durable paper products. These increases were partially offset by decreased sales in the aerospace and transportation market of $835,000. Revenues from our Construction Materials segment decreased $343,000 or 1% to $52,588,000 for the year ended August 31, 2013 compared to $52,931,000 for fiscal 2012. The decreased sales from our Construction Materials segment in fiscal 2013 was primarily due to reduced sales of $2,266,000 in pipeline products produced at our UK facility as a result of lower project demand primarily in the Middle East, as well as decreased sales of $2,108,000 from our highway construction products. These decreases were partially offset by increased sales of: (a) $2,397,000 from our coating and lining systems; (b) $827,000 from pipeline products produces at our North America facilities; and (c) $805,000 from our private label products due to increased demand from some of our key customers.

Cost of Products and Services Sold

        Cost of products and services sold decreased $842,000 or 1% to $145,193,000 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014 compared to $146,035,000 in fiscal 2013. As a percentage of revenues, cost of products and services sold decreased to 65% in fiscal 2014 compared to 68% for fiscal 2013.

        The following table summarizes the relative percentages of costs of products and services sold to revenues for both of our operating segments:

        Cost of products and services sold in our Industrial Materials segment was $108,121,000 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014 compared to $110,051,000 in fiscal 2013. As a percentage of revenues, cost of products and services sold in this segment decreased to 64% in fiscal 2014 compared to 67% in fiscal 2013. As a percentage of revenues, cost of products and services sold in the Industrial Materials segment decreased primarily due to sales mix as well as cost savings realized from the Company's recent plant consolidation efforts. In the past two years, this segment has benefitted from exiting the Randolph, MA (operations relocated in December 2012) and Taylorsville, NC (Insulfab product line sold in October 2013) facilities and transitioning the remaining manufacturing activities from those two facilities to other domestic Chase facilities. Additionally, in the first three months of fiscal 2013, this segment was impacted by incremental cost of products sold of $564,000 due to the sale of inventory which had a stepped up valuation as part of the NEPTCO acquisition.

18

Table of Contents

        Cost of products and services sold in our Construction Materials segment was $37,072,000 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014 compared to $35,984,000 in fiscal 2013. As a percentage of revenues, cost of products and services sold in the Construction Materials segment remained relatively flat despite increased sales of lower margin products primarily due to management's ability to leverage its fixed overhead costs on a higher revenue base coupled with continued focus and scrutiny on material purchases that helped stabilize margins on many of our key product lines.

        In fiscal 2013, cost of products and services sold increased $44,786,000 or 44% to $146,035,000 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013 compared to $101,249,000 in fiscal 2012. As a percentage of revenues, cost of products and services sold remained flat at 68% in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012. Cost of products and services sold in our Industrial Materials segment was $110,051,000 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013 compared to $64,539,000 in fiscal 2012. As a percentage of revenues, cost of products and services sold in this segment remained relatively flat year over year. The 2013 fiscal year was negatively impacted by the following: (a) a full year of costs of the NEPTCO JV, which has higher cost of products sold as a percentage of revenues, as opposed to the prior year only including two months of the NEPTCO JV costs (acquired in June 2012); (b) expenses of $564,000 due to the fair value inventory step up related to the NEPTCO acquisition; and (c) accrued transition costs of $150,000 related to our move from our Randolph plant. These increases in costs were offset by a more favorable product sales mix in fiscal 2013, as well as the inclusion of the following costs in fiscal 2012: (a) expense of $828,000 due to the fair value inventory step up related to the NEPTCO acquisition; (b) moving expenses of $324,000 related to our plant transition from Webster to Oxford and Camberley to Winnersh; (c) accrued transition costs of $550,000 related to our move from our Randolph plant; and (d) certain supplier inconsistencies that resulted in excess waste and incremental expenses of $345,000 related to the utilization of specialized testing facilities for analyzing incoming raw materials for proper specifications. Cost of products and services sold in our Construction Materials segment was $35,984,000 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013 compared to $36,710,000 in fiscal 2012. As a percentage of revenues, cost of products and services sold in the Construction Materials segment decreased slightly due to a positive sales mix earlier in the fiscal year as we had increased sales of higher margin products coupled with decreased sales of lower margin products.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

        Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $596,000 or 1% to $42,640,000 during fiscal 2014 compared to $43,236,000 in fiscal 2013. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 19% of total revenues in fiscal 2014 compared to 20% for fiscal 2013. The percentage decrease is primarily attributable to our continued emphasis on controlling costs, as well as the increased benefit due to the capitalization of internal costs related to our on-going global ERP implementation project. Additionally, the prior year period included an incremental $247,000 of pension related settlement costs due to the timing of lump sum distributions.

        During fiscal 2013, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $13,064,000 or 43% to $43,236,000, compared to $30,172,000 in fiscal 2012. The dollar increase in fiscal 2013 was primarily attributable to increased sales, as well as incremental expenses from NEPTCO, which was acquired in June 2012, and included amortization of additional intangible assets of $2,209,000. Additionally, fiscal 2013 included $595,000 of pension related settlement costs due to the timing of lump sum distributions, as well as $1,700,000 of increased incentive compensation expense due to the fiscal 2013 financial results, increased incentive compensation for NEPTCO employees, and overall plan design. As a percentage of revenues, however, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 20% of total revenues in fiscal 2013 compared to 21% for fiscal 2012. The percentage decrease was attributable to management's continued emphasis on controlling costs, including reduced travel, advertising, and other selling related expenses.

        In fiscal 2014, bad debt expense, net of recoveries, was $28,000 compared to fiscal 2013 where we had recoveries of previously identified bad debt that exceeded additions to bad debt expense for the year, resulting in a net gain of $114,000. The gain of $114,000 in fiscal 2013 compared to bad debt expense, net of recoveries, of $155,000 in fiscal 2012. The comparatively higher bad debt expense in fiscal 2012 was primarily due to financial difficulties for some of our international customers, as well as overall increased receivable balances due to higher sales. We continue with our strict adherence to our established credit policies and continue to closely monitor the accounts receivable function while taking a proactive approach to the collections process.

19

Table of Contents

Acquisition related costs

        In fiscal 2012, we incurred $3,206,000 of acquisition costs related to our acquisition of NEPTCO. This acquisition was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with the accounting standards, and as such all related professional service fees (i.e., banking, legal, accounting, actuarial, etc.) were expensed as incurred during the year ended August 31, 2012.

Interest Expense

        Interest expense decreased $151,000 or 12% to $1,143,000 in fiscal 2014 compared to $1,294,000 in fiscal 2013. The decrease in interest expense in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 is a direct result of a reduction in our overall debt balance through required principal payments made from operating cash flow over the past year. Interest expense increased $896,000 to $1,294,000 in fiscal 2013 compared to $398,000 in fiscal 2012 primarily due to incurring a full year of interest expense on the term note related to the June 2012 acquisition of NEPTCO.

Gain on sale of product line

        On October 7, 2013, we sold substantially all of our property and assets, including intellectual property, comprising the Insulfab product line, to an unrelated buyer. This transaction resulted in a pre-tax book gain of $5,706,000, which was recorded in our fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2013 (the first quarter of our fiscal 2014).

Other (Expense) Income

        Other expense was $246,000 in fiscal 2014 compared to other income of $313,000 in fiscal 2013, a decrease of $559,000. Other (expense) income primarily includes interest income and foreign exchange gains and losses caused by changes in exchange rates on transactions or balances denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of our subsidiaries. The decrease in other expense in fiscal 2014 as compared to the prior year is primarily due to foreign exchange losses driven by the strengthening of the pound sterling against both the euro and US dollar throughout fiscal 2014.

        Other income increased $211,000 to $313,000 in fiscal 2013 compared to $102,000 in fiscal 2012, primarily due to foreign exchange gains driven by the strengthening of the pound sterling during fiscal 2013.

Income Taxes

        The effective tax rate for fiscal 2014 was 34.5% as compared to 35.1% and 33.8% in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. In all three years, we have received the benefit of the domestic production deduction and foreign rate differential. The decreased effective tax rate in fiscal 2014 is primarily due to a more favorable effective state income tax rate and foreign rate differential than realized in fiscal 2013. The effective tax rate of 35.1% for fiscal 2013 compares unfavorably to 2012 primarily due to a less favorable effective state income tax rate than realized in the prior fiscal year.

Non-controlling Interest

        The net loss from non-controlling interest relates to a joint venture in which we have, through our NEPTCO subsidiary, a 50% ownership interest. The joint venture between NEPTCO and its joint venture partner (an otherwise unrelated party) is managed and operated on a day-to-day basis by NEPTCO. The purpose of this joint venture is to combine the elements of each member's fiber optic strength businesses.

Net Income attributable to Chase Corporation

        Net income in fiscal 2014 increased $9,417,000 or 55% to $26,631,000 compared to $17,214,000 in fiscal 2013. The increase in net income in fiscal 2014 is primarily due to the previously mentioned $5,706,000 pre-tax gain that resulted from the sale of the Insulfab product line in October 2013, numerous cost containment initiatives including recent plant consolidation efforts, and the incremental benefit of $236,000 from capitalized internal labor used in our on-going global ERP implementation project. We have capitalized $719,000 of internal costs related to our ERP implementation project for the year to date period compared to $483,000 in the prior year to date period. Additionally, net income in fiscal 2013 was negatively impacted by expenses of $564,000 in inventory fair value step up related to the NEPTCO acquisition, and the acceleration of defined benefit plan settlement costs of $1,223,000 resulting from the timing of lump sum distributions to participants.

20

Table of Contents

        Net income in fiscal 2013 increased $7,876,000 or 84% to $17,214,000 compared to $9,338,000 in fiscal 2012. The increase in net income in fiscal 2013 was primarily due to the inclusion of NEPTCO, and the favorable mix on product sales as discussed previously. These increases were partially offset by expenses related to the acceleration of defined benefit plan settlement costs of $1,223,000 resulting from the timing of lump sum distributions to participants. Additionally, net income in the prior year period was negatively impacted by the following: (a) $3,206,000 in acquisition related expenses; (b) expenses of $828,000 in inventory fair value step up related to the NEPTCO acquisition; (c) plant transition and moving expenses of $874,000; and (d) accelerated pension settlement charges of $550,000 resulting from the timing of lump sum distributions.

Other Important Performance Measures

        We believe that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are useful performance measures. They are used by our executive management team and board of directors to measure operating performance, to allocate resources, to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies and to communicate with our Board of Directors and investors concerning our financial performance. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures.

        We define EBITDA as follows: net income attributable to Chase Corporation before interest expense from borrowings, income tax expense, depreciation expense from fixed assets, and amortization expense from intangible assets. We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA excluding costs and gains/losses related to our acquisitions and divestitures, costs of products sold related to inventory step-up to fair value, and settlement (gains) or losses resulting from lump sum distributions to participants from our defined benefit plan.

        The use of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA has limitations and these performance measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as an alternative to, U.S. GAAP measures such as net income. Our measurement of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

        The following table provides a reconciliation of net income attributable to Chase Corporation, the most directly comparable financial measure presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the periods presented:

Liquidity and Sources of Capital

        Our cash balance increased $23,225,000 to $53,222,000 at August 31, 2014 from $29,997,000 at August 31, 2013. The increased cash balance is primarily attributable to the proceeds from the sale of the Insulfab product line in October 2013, as well as from cash from operations, partially offset by payments on: our fiscal 2013 annual dividend, outstanding debt, income taxes, annual incentive compensation and equipment purchases. Of the

21

Table of Contents

above noted amounts, $14,575,000 and $10,013,000 were held outside the U.S. by our foreign subsidiaries as of August 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Given our cash position in the U.S. and the potential for increased investment and acquisitions in foreign jurisdictions, we do not have a history of repatriating a significant portion of our foreign cash. However, we do not currently take the position that undistributed foreign subsidiaries' earnings are considered to be permanently reinvested. Accordingly, we recognize a deferred tax liability for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences due to these unremitted earnings. In the event that circumstances should change in the future and we decide to repatriate these foreign amounts to fund U.S. operations, the Company would pay the applicable U.S. taxes on these repatriated foreign amounts to satisfy all previously recorded tax liabilities.

        Our cash balance increased $14,817,000 to $29,997,000 at August 31, 2013 from $15,180,000 at August 31, 2012. This was a result of cash flows generated from operations during the fiscal year, offset by principal payments on outstanding debt, equipment purchases, and payment of our fiscal 2012 annual dividend. Of the above noted amounts, $10,013,000 and $4,826,000 were held outside the U.S. by our foreign subsidiaries as of August 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

        Cash provided by operations was $28,606,000 for the year ended August 31, 2014 compared to $28,157,000 in fiscal 2013 and $13,946,000 in fiscal 2012. Cash provided by operations during fiscal 2014 was primarily due to operating income and increased accounts payable due to the timing of vendor payments, offset by increased inventory resulting from strategic purchases of raw materials and increased accounts receivable balances due to higher sales volumes. Cash provided by operations during fiscal 2013 was primarily due to operating income, offset by decreased accrued expenses and increased inventory balances. Cash provided by operations during fiscal 2012 was primarily due to operating income and decreased inventory as a result of higher sales volumes, offset by decreased accounts payable and increased accounts receivable balances.

        The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 3.5 as of August 31, 2014 compared to 3.1 as of August 31, 2013. The increase in our current ratio at August 31, 2014 was primarily attributable to increases in cash due to the proceeds from the sale of the Insulfab product line in October 2013 and accounts receivable resulting from higher sales volumes, as well as decreases in accrued income taxes due to the timing of tax payments. This was partially offset by an increase to accounts payable due to the timing of some raw material purchases during fiscal 2014.

        Cash provided by investing activities was $4,443,000 for the year ended August 31, 2014 compared to cash used in investing activities of $3,580,000 in fiscal 2013 and $67,090,000 in fiscal 2012. During fiscal 2014, cash provided by investing activities was primarily due to the proceeds from the sale of the Insulfab product line in October 2013, which was partially offset by cash paid for purchases of machinery and equipment at our manufacturing locations. During fiscal 2013, cash used in investing activities was primarily due to $3,043,000 paid for purchases of machinery and equipment at our manufacturing locations, and $354,000 of professional legal services for new patent work that have been capitalized as intangibles. During fiscal 2012, cash used in investing activities was primarily due to payments totaling $62,217,000, net of cash acquired, for the acquisition of NEPTCO and $5,230,000 paid for purchases of machinery and equipment at our manufacturing locations.

        Cash used in financing activities was $10,501,000 for the year ended August 31, 2014 compared to $9,614,000 in fiscal 2013 and cash provided by financing activities of $53,508,000 in fiscal 2012. During both fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013, cash used in finance activities was primarily due to our annual dividend payment and payments made on the bank loans used to finance our acquisition of NEPTCO. During fiscal 2012, cash provided by financing activities primarily resulted from $70,000,000 in term debt used to finance our acquisition of NEPTCO, offset by payments of $10,667,000 to retire our previously held term notes with Bank of America and RBS Citizens, payments on our line of credit arrangement, and payment of our annual dividend. Additionally, in fiscal 2012, we paid the final two scheduled promissory note payments of $1,000,000 each to the former CIM shareholders in accordance with the CIM stock purchase agreement.

        On October 23, 2014, we announced a cash dividend of $0.60 per share (totaling $5,462,000), composed of $0.50 related to earnings from continuing operations and $0.10 related to the sale of a non-strategic business, to shareholders of record on November 3, 2014 and payable on December 4, 2014.

        On October 23, 2013, we announced a cash dividend of $0.45 per share (totaling $4,080,000) to shareholders of record on November 5, 2013 and paid on December 4, 2013.

22

Table of Contents

        On October 23, 2012, we announced a cash dividend of $0.40 per share (totaling $3,626,000) to shareholders of record on November 2, 2012 and paid on December 5, 2012.

        In June 2012, as part of our acquisition of NEPTCO, we borrowed $70,000,000 under a five year term debt financing arrangement led and arranged by Bank of America, with participation from RBS Citizens (the "Credit Facility"). The applicable interest rate is based on the effective LIBOR plus a range of 1.75% to 2.25%, depending on our consolidated leverage ratio. At August 31, 2014, the applicable interest rate was 1.91% per annum and the outstanding principal amount was $58,800,000. We are required to repay the principal amount of the term loan in quarterly installments. Installment payments of $1,400,000 began in September 2012 and continued through June 2014, increased to $1,750,000 per quarter thereafter through June 2015, and will increase to $2,100,000 per quarter thereafter through March 2017. The Credit Facility matures in June 2017 and prepayment of the Credit Facility is allowed at any time.

        We have a revolving line of credit with Bank of America (the "Revolver") totaling $15,000,000, which bears interest at LIBOR plus a range of 1.75% to 2.25%, depending on our consolidated leverage ratio, or, at our option, at the bank's base lending rate. As of August 31, 2014 and October 31, 2014, the entire amount of $15,000,000 was available for use. The Revolver is scheduled to mature in June 2017. This Revolver allows for increased flexibility for working capital requirements going forward, and we plan to use this availability to help finance our cash needs, including potential acquisitions, in fiscal 2015 and future periods.

        Our credit agreement with Bank of America, which outlines the terms of both the Credit Facility and the Revolver, contains customary affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness. It also requires us to maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA (each as defined in the credit agreement) of no more than 3.00 to 1.00, and to maintain a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio (as calculated in the credit agreement) of at least 1.25 to 1.00. We were in compliance with our debt covenants as of August 31, 2014.

        We currently have several on-going capital projects that are important to our long term strategic goals. Machinery and equipment will also be added as needed to increase capacity or enhance operating efficiencies in our other manufacturing plants.

        We may also consider the acquisition of companies or other assets this year or in future periods which are complementary to our business. We believe that our existing resources, including cash on hand and our Revolver, together with cash generated from operations and additional bank borrowings, will be sufficient to fund our cash flow requirements through at least the next twelve months. However, there can be no assurances that additional financing will be available on favorable terms, if at all.

        To the extent that interest rates increase in future periods, we will assess the impact of these higher interest rates on the financial and cash flow projections of our potential acquisitions.

        We have no material off balance sheet arrangements.

Contractual Obligations

        The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations at August 31, 2014 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods.

23

Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

        In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-02, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income". This ASU expands the presentation of changes in accumulated other comprehensive income. The new guidance requires an entity to disaggregate the total change of each component of other comprehensive income either on the face of the net income statement or as a separate disclosure in the notes. ASU 2013-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012. We adopted this ASU in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. The provisions of ASU 2013-02 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers", which will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The core principle of the ASU is that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services. The ASU requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. The ASU will be effective for our fiscal year 2018, beginning September 1, 2017, including interim periods, and allows for both retrospective and prospective methods of adoption. We are in the process of determining the method of adoption and assessing the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments, and Estimates

        The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") requires companies to provide additional disclosure and commentary on their most critical accounting policies. The SEC has defined the most critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of a company's financial condition and operating results, and requires management to make its most significant estimates and judgments in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. Our critical accounting policies are described below.

Accounts Receivable

        We evaluate the collectability of accounts receivable balances based on a combination of factors. In cases where we are aware of circumstances that may impair a specific customer's ability to meet its financial obligations to us, a specific allowance against amounts due to us is recorded, and thereby reduces the net recognized receivable to the amount we reasonably believe will be collected. For all other customers, we recognize allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, industry and geographic concentrations, the current business environment and our historical experience. If the financial condition of our customers deteriorates or if economic conditions worsen, additional allowances may be required in the future, which could have an adverse impact on our future operating results.

Inventories

        We value inventory at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Management assesses the recoverability of inventory based on types and levels of inventory held, forecasted demand and changes in technology. These assessments require management judgments and estimates, and valuation adjustments for excess and obsolete inventory may be recorded based on these assessments. We estimate excess and obsolescence exposures based upon assumptions about future demand, product transitions, and market conditions and record adjustments to reduce inventories to their estimated net realizable value. The failure to accurately forecast demand may lead to additional excess and obsolete inventory and future charges.

24

Table of Contents

Business Combinations

        We assign the value of the consideration transferred to acquire a business to the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their fair values at the date of acquisition. We assess the fair value of assets, including intangible assets, using a variety of methods and each asset is measured at fair value from the perspective of a market participant. The method used to estimate the fair values of intangible assets incorporates significant assumptions regarding the estimates a market participant would make in order to evaluate an asset, including a market participant's use of the asset and the appropriate discount rates for a market participant. Assets recorded from the perspective of a market participant that are determined to not have economic use for us are expensed immediately. Any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired is allocated to goodwill. Transaction costs and restructuring costs associated with a transaction to acquire a business are expensed as incurred.

Goodwill, Intangible Assets, and Other Long-Lived Assets

        Long-lived assets consist of goodwill, identifiable intangible assets, trademarks, patents and agreements and property, plant, and equipment. Intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment, excluding goodwill, are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful life. We review long-lived assets and all intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable.

        Goodwill is also reviewed at least annually for impairment. We perform our annual goodwill impairment assessment during the fourth fiscal quarter of each year. When evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill we first assess a range of qualitative factors, including but not limited to, industry conditions, the competitive environment, changes in the market for our products and services, entity specific factors such as strategy and changes in key personnel, and the overall financial performance for each of our reporting units relative to expected historical or projected future operating results. If after completing this assessment, it is determined that it is more that than likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we then proceed to a two-step impairment testing methodology using the income approach (discounted cash flow method).

        In the first step of this testing methodology, we compare the carrying value of the reporting unit, including goodwill, with its fair value, as determined by its estimated discounted cash flows. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we then complete the second step of the impairment test to determine the amount of impairment to be recognized. In the second step, we estimate an implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities other than goodwill (including intangible assets). If the carrying value of a reporting unit's goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, we record an impairment loss equal to the difference in that period.

        When required, we arrive at our estimates of fair value using a discounted cash flow methodology which includes estimates of future cash flows to be generated by particular assets, as well as selecting a discount rate to measure the present value of those anticipated cash flows. Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment and includes making assumptions about projected growth rates, industry-specific factors, working capital requirements, current and anticipated operating conditions, any terminal sales value at the end of the period under review. The cash flow estimates used to determine impairment, if any, contain management's best estimates, using appropriate and customary assumptions and projections at the time. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.

Revenues

        We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, performance of our obligation is complete, our price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and we are reasonably assured of collecting. This is typically at the time of shipment or upon receipt by the customer based on contractual terms. If a loss is anticipated on any contract, a provision for the entire loss is made immediately. Revenue recognition involves judgments and assessments of expected returns, and the likelihood of nonpayment by customers. We analyze various factors, including a review of specific customer contracts and shipment terms, historical experience, creditworthiness of customers and current market and economic conditions in determining when to recognize revenue. Changes in judgments on these factors could impact the timing and amount of revenue recognized with a resulting impact on the timing and amount of operating income. Commissions are recognized when earned and payments are received from the manufacturers represented. Royalty revenue is recognized based on licensee

25

Table of Contents

production statements received from the authorized manufacturers. Billed shipping and handling fees are recorded as sales revenue with the associated costs recorded as costs of products and services sold.

Contingent Income Tax Liabilities

        We are subject to routine income tax audits that occur periodically in the normal course of business. Our contingent income tax liabilities are estimated based on the methodology prescribed in the guidance for accounting for uncertain tax positions, which we adopted as of the beginning of fiscal 2008. The guidance prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. Our liabilities related to uncertain tax positions require an assessment of the probability of the income-tax-related exposures and settlements and are influenced by our historical audit experiences with various state and federal taxing authorities, as well as by current income tax trends. If circumstances change, we may be required to record adjustments that could be material to our reported financial condition and results of operations. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report for more information on our accounting for uncertain tax positions.

Deferred Income Taxes

        We evaluate the need for a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. We have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. Should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

Stock Based Compensation

        We measure compensation cost for share-based compensation at fair value, including estimated forfeitures, and recognize the expense over the period that the recipient is required to provide service in exchange for the award, which generally is the vesting period. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of stock options. This model requires significant estimates related to the award's expected life and future stock price volatility of the underlying equity security. In determining the amount of expense to be recorded, we are also required to estimate forfeiture rates for awards, based on the probability that employees will complete the required service period. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on historical experience. If actual forfeitures differ significantly from our estimates, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in future periods.

Pension Benefits

        We sponsor a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering employees of certain divisions of the Company. In calculating our retirement plan obligations and related expense, we make various assumptions and estimates. These assumptions include discount rates, benefits earned, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, and other factors. While we believe that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect our pension obligations and future expense.

        Effective December 1, 2008, the Chase defined benefit pension plan was amended to include a soft freeze whereby any employee hired after the effective date of December 1, 2008 will not be admitted to the plan. The only exception related to employees of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Union whose contract was amended recently to include a soft freeze whereby any employees hired after the effective date of July 15, 2012 will not be admitted to the plan. All eligible participants who were previously admitted to the plan prior to the applicable soft freeze dates will continue to accrue benefits as detailed in the plan agreements.

        NEPTCO has a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of our union employees at our Pawtucket, RI plant. This plan was frozen effective October 31, 2006, and as a result, no new participants can enter the plan and the benefits of current participants were frozen as of that date. The benefits are based on years of service and the employee's average compensation during the earlier of five years before retirement, or October 31, 2006.

        We account for our pension plans following the requirements of ASC Topic 715, "Compensation—Retirement Benefits" ("ASC 715"). ASC 715 requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial position the funded status of a benefit plan; (b) measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the end of the employer's fiscal year (with limited exceptions); and (c) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income,

26

Table of Contents

net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs pursuant to prior existing guidance.

Impact of Inflation

        Inflation has not had a significant long-term impact on our earnings. In the event of significant inflation, our efforts to recover cost increases would be hampered as a result of the competitive nature of the industries in which we operate.

Forward-Looking Information

        From time to time, we may publish, verbally or in written form, forward-looking statements relating to such matters as anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological developments, new products, acquisition or consolidation strategies, anticipated sources of capital, research and development activities and similar matters. In fact, this Form 10-K (or any other periodic reporting documents required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) may contain forward-looking statements reflecting our current views concerning potential or anticipated future events or developments, including our strategic goals for future fiscal periods. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements. We caution investors that any forward-looking statements made by us are not guarantees of future performance and that a variety of factors could cause our actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties which may affect the operations, performance, development and results of our business include, but are not limited to, the following: uncertainties relating to economic conditions; uncertainties relating to customer plans and commitments; the pricing and availability of equipment, materials and inventories; the impact of acquisitions on our business and results of operations; technological developments; performance issues with suppliers and subcontractors; our ability to renew existing credit facilities or to obtain new or additional financing as needed; economic growth; delays in testing of new products; our ability to comply with new regulatory requirements without undue expense or other difficulties; the impact of changes in accounting standards; rapid technology changes and the highly competitive environment in which we operate. These risks and uncertainties also include those risks outlined under Item 1A (Risk Factors) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made.

ITEM 7A—QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

        We limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. At August 31, 2014, other than our restricted investments (which are restricted for use in a non-qualified retirement savings plan for certain key employees and members of the Board of Directors), all of our funds were either in demand deposit accounts or investment instruments that meet high credit quality standards such as money market funds, government securities, or commercial paper.

        Our domestic operations have limited currency exposure since substantially all transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars. However, our European operations are subject to currency exchange fluctuations. We continue to review our policies and procedures to reduce this exposure while maintaining the benefit from these operations and sales to other European currency denoted customers. As of August 31, 2014, the Company had cash balances in the following foreign currencies (with USD equivalents):