Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017
OR
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission file number: 001-35249
THE CHEFS’ WAREHOUSE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 20-3031526 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
100 East Ridge Road Ridgefield, Connecticut | 06877 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (203) 894-1345
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☒ | |
Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ☐ |
Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
Number of shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding at August 8, 2017: 26,360,601
1
THE CHEFS’ WAREHOUSE, INC.
FORM 10-Q
Table of Contents
Page | ||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
Item 1. | ||
Item 2. | ||
Item 3. | ||
Item 4. | ||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | ||
Item 1. | ||
Item 1A. | ||
Item 2. | ||
Item 3. | ||
Item 4. | ||
Item 5. | ||
Item 6. | ||
2
CAUTION CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this report regarding the business of The Chefs’ Warehouse, Inc. (the “Company”) that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve risks and uncertainties and are based on current expectations and management estimates; actual results may differ materially. Words such as “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and/or could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties which could impact these statements include, but are not limited to, the Company’s ability to successfully deploy its operational initiatives to achieve synergies from our acquisitions; the Company’s and its customers current economic environment, changes in disposable income levels and consumer discretionary spending on food-away-from-home purchases; the Company’s sensitivity to general economic conditions, including vulnerability to economic and other developments in the geographic markets in which it operates; the risks of supply chain interruptions due to lack of long-term contracts, severe weather or more prolonged climate change, work stoppages or otherwise; the risk of loss of customers due to the fact the Company does not customarily have long-term contracts with its customers; the risks of loss of revenue or reductions in operating margins in the Company’s protein business as a result of competitive pressures within this reporting unit of the Company’s business; changes in the availability or cost of the Company’s specialty food products; the ability to effectively price the Company’s specialty food products and reduce the Company’s expenses; the relatively low margins of the foodservice distribution industry and the Company’s sensitivity to inflationary and deflationary pressures; the Company’s ability to successfully identify, obtain financing for and complete acquisitions of other foodservice distributors and to integrate and realize expected synergies from those acquisitions; the Company’s ability to service customers from its Chicago, San Francisco and Las Vegas distribution centers and the expenses associated therewith; increased fuel cost volatility and expectations regarding the use of fuel surcharges; fluctuations in the wholesale prices of beef, poultry and seafood, including increases in these prices as a result of increases in the cost of feeding and caring for livestock; the loss of key members of the Company’s management team and the Company’s ability to replace such personnel; the strain on the Company’s infrastructure and resources caused by its growth; and other risks and uncertainties included under the heading Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 10, 2017 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
3
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THE CHEFS’ WAREHOUSE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)
June 30, 2017 (unaudited) | December 30, 2016 | ||||||
ASSETS | |||||||
Current assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 37,004 | $ | 32,862 | |||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $7,590 in 2017 and $6,848 in 2016 | 129,194 | 128,030 | |||||
Inventories, net | 96,247 | 87,498 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 11,813 | 16,101 | |||||
Total current assets | 274,258 | 264,491 | |||||
Equipment and leasehold improvements, net | 64,860 | 62,183 | |||||
Software costs, net | 5,422 | 5,927 | |||||
Goodwill | 167,227 | 163,784 | |||||
Intangible assets, net | 122,753 | 131,131 | |||||
Other assets | 3,120 | 6,022 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 637,640 | $ | 633,538 | |||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 78,267 | $ | 65,514 | |||
Accrued liabilities | 17,279 | 17,546 | |||||
Accrued compensation | 8,983 | 9,519 | |||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 4,621 | 14,795 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 109,150 | 107,374 | |||||
Long-term debt, net of current portion | 315,493 | 317,725 | |||||
Deferred taxes, net | 7,686 | 6,958 | |||||
Other liabilities and deferred credits | 7,989 | 7,721 | |||||
Total liabilities | 440,318 | 439,778 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies | — | — | |||||
Stockholders’ equity: | |||||||
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding June 30, 2017 and December 30, 2016 | — | — | |||||
Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 26,367,935 and 26,280,469 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 30, 2016, respectively | 264 | 263 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 128,473 | 127,180 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,950 | ) | (2,186 | ) | |||
Retained earnings | 70,535 | 68,503 | |||||
Stockholders’ equity | 197,322 | 193,760 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 637,640 | $ | 633,538 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
THE CHEFS’ WAREHOUSE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Thirteen Weeks Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 331,656 | $ | 291,209 | |||
Cost of sales | 249,060 | 219,406 | |||||
Gross profit | 82,596 | 71,803 | |||||
Operating expenses | 70,433 | 60,615 | |||||
Operating income | 12,163 | 11,188 | |||||
Interest expense | 5,880 | 25,667 | |||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 6,283 | (14,479 | ) | ||||
Provision for income tax expense (benefit) | 2,609 | (6,024 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 3,674 | $ | (8,455 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 235 | 521 | |||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 3,909 | $ | (7,934 | ) | ||
Net income (loss) per share: | |||||||
Basic | $ | 0.14 | $ | (0.33 | ) | ||
Diluted | $ | 0.14 | $ | (0.33 | ) | ||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | |||||||
Basic | 25,990,580 | 25,912,686 | |||||
Diluted | 27,276,575 | 25,912,686 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
THE CHEFS’ WAREHOUSE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Twenty-six Weeks Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 619,346 | $ | 552,045 | |||
Cost of sales | 462,846 | 414,284 | |||||
Gross profit | 156,500 | 137,761 | |||||
Operating expenses | 141,216 | 121,213 | |||||
Operating income | 15,284 | 16,548 | |||||
Interest expense | 11,813 | 29,323 | |||||
Loss on asset disposal | — | 3 | |||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 3,471 | (12,778 | ) | ||||
Provision for income tax expense (benefit) | 1,439 | (5,316 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 2,032 | $ | (7,462 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 236 | 1,106 | |||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 2,268 | $ | (6,356 | ) | ||
Net income (loss) per share: | |||||||
Basic | $ | 0.08 | $ | (0.29 | ) | ||
Diluted | $ | 0.08 | $ | (0.29 | ) | ||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | |||||||
Basic | 25,971,409 | 25,898,368 | |||||
Diluted | 26,021,439 | 25,898,368 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
THE CHEFS’ WAREHOUSE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands)
Twenty-six Weeks Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 2,032 | $ | (7,462 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||
Depreciation | 4,227 | 2,937 | |||||
Amortization | 5,731 | 5,567 | |||||
Provision for allowance for doubtful accounts | 1,747 | 1,552 | |||||
Deferred rent | 195 | 1,423 | |||||
Deferred taxes | 588 | 790 | |||||
Amortization of deferred financing fees | 1,064 | 675 | |||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | — | 22,310 | |||||
Stock compensation | 1,614 | 1,369 | |||||
Change in fair value of contingent earn-out liability | 48 | (1,815 | ) | ||||
Loss on sale of assets | — | 3 | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: | |||||||
Accounts receivable | (2,922 | ) | 3,215 | ||||
Inventories | (8,678 | ) | 1,735 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 4,304 | (11,799 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and accrued compensation | 11,903 | (16,559 | ) | ||||
Other liabilities | 42 | (177 | ) | ||||
Other assets | (219 | ) | (463 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 21,676 | 3,301 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||
Capital expenditures | (6,370 | ) | (8,034 | ) | |||
Net cash used in investing activities | (6,370 | ) | (8,034 | ) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||
Payment of debt | (10,444 | ) | (130,474 | ) | |||
Proceeds from issuance of debt | — | 301,950 | |||||
Debt prepayment penalty and other fees | — | (21,219 | ) | ||||
Cash paid for deferred financing fees | — | (6,189 | ) | ||||
Surrender of shares to pay withholding taxes | (319 | ) | (424 | ) | |||
Cash paid for contingent earn-out liability | (500 | ) | — | ||||
Borrowings under revolving credit facility | — | 33,200 | |||||
Payments under revolving credit facility | — | (126,582 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (11,263 | ) | 50,262 | ||||
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents | 99 | 268 | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 4,142 | 45,797 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents-beginning of period | 32,862 | 2,454 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents-end of period | $ | 37,004 | $ | 48,251 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
THE CHEFS’ WAREHOUSE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts and per share data)
Note 1 Operations and Basis of Presentation
Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
The financial statements include the consolidated accounts of The Chefs’ Warehouse, Inc. (the “Company”), and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company’s quarterly periods end on the thirteenth Friday of each quarter. Every six to seven years the Company will add a fourteenth week to its fourth quarter to more closely align its year end to the calendar year. The fiscal year ended December 30, 2016 consisted of 53 weeks. The Company operates in one reportable segment, food product distribution, which is concentrated on the East and West Coasts of the United States. The Company’s customer base consists primarily of menu-driven independent restaurants, fine dining establishments, country clubs, hotels, caterers, culinary schools, bakeries, patisseries, chocolatiers, cruise lines, casinos and specialty food stores.
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include all the accounts of the Company and its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Unaudited Interim Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related interim information contained within the notes to such unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim information and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2016 filed as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 10, 2017.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements appearing in this Form 10-Q have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 10, 2017, and in the opinion of management include all normal recurring adjustments that are necessary for the fair statement of the Company’s interim period results. The year-end consolidated balance sheet data was derived from the audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. Due to seasonal fluctuations and other factors, the results of operations for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from management’s estimates.
Note 2 Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Guidance Adopted in 2017
Subsequent Measurement of Inventory: In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance to simplify the subsequent measurement of inventory. This guidance requires that inventory be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The Company adopted this guidance prospectively. Adoption of this guidance did not impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting: In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance to simplify the accounting for employee share-based payments. The main provisions are to recognize excess tax benefits in the income statement rather than to additional paid-in capital, allow an entity to account for forfeitures as they occur, allow an entity to
8
withhold employee shares up to the individual's maximum statutory tax rate without triggering liability classification of the award, present excess tax benefits as an operating cash flow and to present cash payments for employee tax withholding on vested stock awards as a financing cash flow. The guidance also requires that any unrecognized tax benefits that were not previously recognized be recorded through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in the period in which the guidance is adopted. Upon adoption, the Company made an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur and there were no unrecognized tax benefits. Adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Restricted Cash: In November 2016, the FASB issued guidance which includes guidance to clarify how companies present and classify restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The guidance requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Adoption of this guidance did not impact its consolidated financial statements as the Company does not have restricted cash.
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment: In January 2017, the FASB issued guidance which simplifies goodwill impairment testing by removing Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test which required companies to assign the fair value of a reporting unit to its underlying assets and liabilities. Instead, an entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carry amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. Adoption of this guidance did not impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Scope of Modification Accounting: In May 2017, the FASB issued guidance which clarifies when to account for a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award as a modification. Under the new guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions, or the classification of the award (as equity or liability) changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions. Adoption of this guidance did not impact its financial statements as the Company did not have any share-based payment award modifications.
Guidance Not Yet Adopted
In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue. This guidance includes the required steps to achieve the core principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. On August 12, 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after that date. Early adoption is permitted but not before the original effective date (annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016).
The Company has evaluated the impact of this guidance on its customer contracts, sales incentive programs, gift card programs, information systems, business processes, and financial statement disclosures. The new revenue recognition model provides guidance on the identification of multiple performance obligations embedded within customer contracts. The Company's customer contracts include one performance obligation which is satisfied once each product is delivered to the customer. Thus revenues are recognized at a point in time. Under the new standard such performance obligations are satisfied at the point at which the Company transfers control to the customer. This is consistent with the Company's current practice of recognizing revenue upon delivery to the customer, with the exception of the Company's current practice of recognizing revenue at shipping point on direct-to-consumer sales. The Company is in the process of quantifying the impact that the change in revenue recognition timing of its direct-to-consumer sales will have on its financial statements.
The new standard includes the concept of variable consideration and requires companies to include variable consideration in the transaction price to the extent it is probable that there will not be a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized when the uncertainty is resolved. Although the Company's sales incentive programs fall under the scope of this new guidance, it is not expected to have a significant impact on the amount or timing of revenue recognition.
The new standard addresses current diversity in practice in regards to the derecognition of unredeemed gift card liabilities that are not subject to unclaimed property laws. The new guidance requires companies to recognize revenue on such liabilities through breakage or when the likelihood of customer redemption becomes remote. This is consistent with the Company's existing method of recognizing breakage revenue on these liabilities.
The Company expects to adopt this guidance when effective using the modified retrospective approach. Under this approach, prior financial statements would not be restated and a cumulative effect adjustment will be recorded as an adjustment to retained earnings. Adoption will result in expanded disclosures on revenue recognition policies, disaggregated revenues and contract liabilities.
9
In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance to increase the transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Current GAAP does not require lessees to recognize assets and liabilities arising from operating leases on the balance sheet. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company expects to adopt this guidance when effective and is in the early stages of implementation. Adoption will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements, primarily to the consolidated balance sheets and related disclosures.
In January 2017, the FASB issued guidance which clarifies whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions of assets or businesses. The guidance requires an entity to determine if substantially all of the fair value of the assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If this criterion is met, the new guidance would define this as an asset acquisition. Furthermore, the guidance requires a business to include, at a minimum, an input and substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company expects to adopt this guidance when effective and adoption is not expected to have a material effect on its financial statements.
Note 3 Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.14 | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 0.08 | $ | (0.29 | ) | |||||
Diluted | $ | 0.14 | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 0.08 | $ | (0.29 | ) | |||||
Weighted average common shares: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | 25,990,580 | 25,912,686 | 25,971,409 | 25,898,368 | |||||||||||
Diluted | 27,276,575 | 25,912,686 | 26,021,439 | 25,898,368 |
Reconciliation of net income (loss) per common share:
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | ||||||||||||
Numerator: | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 3,674 | $ | (8,455 | ) | $ | 2,032 | $ | (7,462 | ) | |||||
Add effect of dilutive securities: | |||||||||||||||
Interest on convertible notes, net of tax | 134 | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Adjusted net income (loss) | $ | 3,808 | $ | (8,455 | ) | $ | 2,032 | $ | (7,462 | ) | |||||
Denominator: | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding | 25,990,580 | 25,912,686 | 25,971,409 | 25,898,368 | |||||||||||
Dilutive effect of unvested common shares | 48,621 | — | 50,030 | — | |||||||||||
Dilutive effect of convertible notes | 1,237,374 | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding | 27,276,575 | 25,912,686 | 26,021,439 | 25,898,368 |
Potentially dilutive securities that have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per common share because the effect is anti-dilutive:
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | ||||||||
Restricted Share Awards (RSAs) | 115,989 | 317,330 | 147,288 | 317,330 | |||||||
Stock options | 201,878 | — | 204,512 | — | |||||||
Convertible subordinated notes | — | 1,237,374 | 1,237,374 | 1,237,374 |
10
Note 4 Fair Value Measurements; Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
As of June 30, 2017, the Company’s only asset or liability measured at fair value was the contingent earn-out liability from the acquisition of Del Monte Capitol Meat Co. and certain related entities (“Del Monte”). This liability was estimated using Level 3 inputs and had a fair value of $1,410. This liability is reflected as accrued liabilities and other liabilities and deferred credits on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of contingent consideration was determined based on a probability-based approach which includes projected results, percentage probability of occurrence and the application of a discount rate to present value the payments. A significant change in projected results, discount rate, or probabilities of occurrence could result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement.
The following table presents the changes in Level 3 contingent consideration liability:
Del Monte | MT Food | Total | |||||||||
Balance December 30, 2016 | $ | 1,362 | $ | 500 | $ | 1,862 | |||||
Cash payments | — | (500 | ) | (500 | ) | ||||||
Changes in fair value | 48 | — | 48 | ||||||||
Balance June 30, 2017 | $ | 1,410 | $ | — | $ | 1,410 |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts reported in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets for accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value, due to the immediate to short-term nature of these financial instruments. The fair values of the revolving credit facility and term loans approximated their book values as of June 30, 2017 and December 30, 2016, as these instruments had variable interest rates that reflected current market rates available to the Company. The fair value of these debt instruments were estimated using Level 3 inputs.
The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s convertible subordinated notes (more fully described in Note 9). In estimating the fair value of these convertible secured notes, the Company utilized Level 3 inputs including prevailing market interest rates to estimate the debt portion of the instrument and a Black Scholes valuation model to estimate the fair value of the conversion option. The Black Scholes model utilizes the market price of the Company’s common stock, estimates of the stock’s volatility and the prevailing risk free interest rate in calculating the fair value estimate.
June 30, 2017 | December 30, 2016 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Convertible Secured Notes | $ | 36,750 | $ | 33,750 | $ | 36,750 | $ | 35,557 |
Note 5 Acquisitions
On June 27, 2016, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of M.T. Food Service, Inc. (“MT Food”), based in Chicago, Illinois. Founded in the mid 1990's, MT Food is a wholesale distributor of dairy, produce, specialty and grocery items in the metro Chicago area. The aggregate purchase price for the transaction at acquisition date was $22,000, including an additional $500 payable eighteen months after the closing date and an earn-out of $500 paid during the second quarter of fiscal 2017. The final aggregate purchase price will be subject to the impact of a customary net working capital true-up. The aggregate purchase price paid by the Company was paid through cash-on-hand and the proceeds from a draw down on its delayed draw term loan facility (see Note 9).
During fiscal 2017, the Company has obtained additional information related to the fair value of intangible assets, deferred taxes, inventories, accounts receivable acquired and liabilities owed. As a result, the Company has recorded a measurement period adjustment resulting in a net increase in goodwill of $3,418 and a decrease in customer relationships of $2,700. The Company has finalized a valuation of the tangible and intangible assets of MT Food as of the acquisition date. These assets are valued at fair value using Level 3 inputs. Customer relationships are to be amortized over 15 years. Goodwill will be amortized over 15 years for tax purposes. The goodwill recorded primarily reflects the value of acquiring an established distributor to
11
leverage the Company’s existing products and distribution center in the markets served by MT Food, as well as any intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition. For the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017, the Company reflected net revenues of $23,244 for MT Food in its consolidated statement of operations. The Company has determined that separate disclosure of MT Food earnings is impracticable for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 due to the full integration of MT Food's business into the Company's Chicago operations.
The table below sets forth the purchase price allocation of the MT Food acquisition:
Current assets (includes cash acquired) | $ | 6,132 | |
Customer relationships | 7,600 | ||
Goodwill | 11,976 | ||
Fixed assets | 261 | ||
Current liabilities | (3,969 | ) | |
Earn-out liability | (500 | ) | |
Other long-term liabilities | (500 | ) | |
Cash purchase price | $ | 21,000 |
Note 6 Inventory
Inventory consists of finished product. Our different entities record inventory using a mixture of first-in, first-out and average cost, which we believe approximates first-in, first-out. Inventory is reflected net of reserves for shrinkage and obsolescence totaling $1,685 and $2,122 at June 30, 2017 and December 30, 2016, respectively.
Note 7 Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
Equipment and leasehold improvements consisted of the following:
As of | ||||||||||
Useful Lives | June 30, 2017 | December 30, 2016 | ||||||||
Land | Indefinite | $ | 1,170 | $ | 1,170 | |||||
Buildings | 20 years | 1,292 | 1,292 | |||||||
Machinery and equipment | 5-10 years | 13,777 | 13,404 | |||||||
Computers, data processing and other equipment | 3-7 years | 9,638 | 9,367 | |||||||
Leasehold improvements | 7-22 years | 52,138 | 47,971 | |||||||
Furniture and fixtures | 7 years | 3,076 | 3,011 | |||||||
Vehicles | 5-7 years | 2,470 | 2,445 | |||||||
Other | 7 years | 95 | 95 | |||||||
Construction-in-process | 12,464 | 11,359 | ||||||||
96,120 | 90,114 | |||||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (31,260 | ) | (27,931 | ) | ||||||
Equipment and leasehold improvements, net | $ | 64,860 | $ | 62,183 |
Construction-in-process at June 30, 2017 and December 30, 2016 related primarily to the implementation of the Company’s Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) system. The rollout of its ERP system will continue throughout fiscal 2017 and 2018.
At June 30, 2017 and December 30, 2016, the Company had $506 of equipment and vehicles financed by capital leases. The Company recorded depreciation on equipment under capital leases of $15 and $19 on these assets during the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016, respectively, and $30 and $43 during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016, respectively.
Depreciation expense, excluding capital leases, was $1,697 and $1,332 for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016, respectively, and $3,429 and $2,176 during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016, respectively.
12
Capitalized software has an estimated useful life of three to seven years. Amortization expense on software was $393 and $380 for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016, respectively, and $768 and $718 during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016, respectively.
Note 8 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are presented as follows:
Carrying amount as of December 30, 2016 | $ | 163,784 | |
Goodwill adjustments | 3,418 | ||
Foreign currency translation | 25 | ||
Carrying amount as of June 30, 2017 | $ | 167,227 |
The goodwill adjustments relate to the MT Food acquisition (see Note 5).
Other intangible assets consist of customer relationships being amortized over a period ranging from four to twenty years, trademarks being amortized over a period of one to forty years, and non-compete agreements being amortized over a period of two to six years. Other intangible assets consisted of the following at June 30, 2017 and December 30, 2016:
June 30, 2017: | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Amount | ||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 101,681 | $ | (23,578 | ) | $ | 78,103 | ||||
Non-compete agreements | 7,166 | (6,296 | ) | 870 | |||||||
Trademarks | 52,574 | (8,794 | ) | 43,780 | |||||||
Total | $ | 161,421 | $ | (38,668 | ) | $ | 122,753 |
December 30, 2016: | |||||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 104,381 | $ | (19,981 | ) | $ | 84,400 | ||||
Non-compete agreements | 7,166 | (5,587 | ) | 1,579 | |||||||
Trademarks | 52,574 | (7,422 | ) | 45,152 | |||||||
Total | $ | 164,121 | $ | (32,990 | ) | $ | 131,131 |
Amortization expense for other intangibles was $2,911 and $2,784 for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016, respectively, and $5,731 and $5,567 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016.
Estimated amortization expense for other intangibles for the remainder of fiscal year ending December 29, 2017 and each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter is as follows:
2017 | $ | 5,593 | |
2018 | 10,130 | ||
2019 | 9,853 | ||
2020 | 9,580 | ||
2021 | 9,580 | ||
2022 | 8,852 | ||
Thereafter | 69,165 | ||
Total | $ | 122,753 |
13
Note 9 Debt Obligations
Debt obligations as of June 30, 2017 and December 30, 2016 consisted of the following:
June 30, 2017 | December 30, 2016 | ||||||
Senior secured term loan | $ | 290,024 | $ | 291,613 | |||
Convertible subordinated notes | 36,750 | 36,750 | |||||
New Markets Tax Credit loan | — | 11,000 | |||||
Capital leases and financed software | 1,438 | 2,136 | |||||
Deferred finance fees and original issue discount | (8,098 | ) | (8,979 | ) | |||
Total debt obligations | 320,114 | 332,520 | |||||
Less: current installments | (4,621 | ) | (14,795 | ) | |||
Total debt obligations excluding current installments | $ | 315,493 | $ | 317,725 |
On April 26, 2012, Dairyland HP LLC (“DHP”), an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company's, entered into a financing arrangement under the New Markets Tax Credit (“NMTC”) program under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, pursuant to which a subsidiary of Chase, provided to DHP an $11,000 construction loan (the “NMTC Loan” ) with an interest rate of 1.00% per annum to help fund DHP’s expansion and build-out of the Bronx, New York facility and the rail shed located at that facility. Borrowings under the NMTC Loan were secured by a first priority secured lien on DHPs leasehold interest in the Bronx, New York facility, including all improvements made on the premises, as well as, among other things, a lien on all fixtures incorporated into the project improvements. The loan matured on April 26, 2017 and was repaid in full, including all accrued interest, for $11,009, of which, $8,070 was paid in cash and $2,939 was paid from the associated sinking fund.
As of June 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants and the Company had reserved $9,545 of the ABL facility for the issuance of letters of credit. As of June 30, 2017, funds totaling $65,455 were available for borrowing under the ABL facility.
Note 10 Stockholders' Equity
The following table reflects the activity of RSAs during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017:
Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||
Unvested at December 30, 2016 | 334,053 | 18.69 | ||||
Granted | 185,502 | 14.77 | ||||
Vested | (80,862 | ) | 19.20 | |||
Forfeited | (74,262 | ) | 18.39 | |||
Unvested at June 30, 2017 | 364,431 | 16.67 |
The Company granted 185,502 RSAs to its employees and directors at a weighted average grant date fair value of $14.77 each during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017. These awards are a mix of time and performance based grants which will vest over periods of one to four years. The Company recognized expense totaling $712 and $593 on its RSAs during the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016, respectively, and $1,316 and $1,097 during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016, respectively.
At June 30, 2017, the Company had 364,431 unvested RSAs outstanding. At June 30, 2017, the total unrecognized compensation cost for these unvested RSAs was $4,944 and the weighted-average remaining useful life was approximately 29 months. Of this total, $3,318 related to RSAs with time-based vesting provisions and $1,626 related to RSAs with performance-based vesting provisions. At June 30, 2017, the weighted-average remaining useful lives for time-based vesting RSAs were approximately 28 months and 30 months for the performance-based vesting RSAs.
14
The following table summarizes stock option activity during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017:
Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(in years) | ||||||||||
Outstanding at December 30, 2016 | 209,071 | $ | 20.23 | $ | — | 9.2 | |||||||
Granted | — | — | |||||||||||
Exercised | — | — | |||||||||||
Canceled/Forfeited | (7,193 | ) | 20.23 | ||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2017 | 201,878 | $ | 20.23 | $ | — | 8.7 | |||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2017 | — | $ | — | $ | — | 0.0 |
The Company recognized expense of $158 and $216 on stock options during the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016, respectively, and $298 and $272 during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016. At June 30, 2017, the total unrecognized compensation cost for these options was $1,069 to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 20 months.
As of June 30, 2017, there were 544,548 shares available for grant under the Company’s 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan. No share-based compensation expense has been capitalized.
Note 11 Related Parties
The Company leased two warehouse facilities from related parties. These facilities are 100% owned by entities controlled by Christopher Pappas, the Company’s chairman, president and chief executive officer, John Pappas, the Company’s vice chairman and one of its directors, and Dean Facatselis, a former non-employee director of the Company and the brother-in-law of Messrs. Pappas, and are deemed to be affiliates of these individuals. Expense related to these facilities totaled $133 and $133, respectively, during the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016 and $266 and $350, respectively, during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016. One of the facilities is a distribution facility leased by Chefs’ Warehouse Mid-Atlantic, LLC for which the Company recently extended the lease expiration date to September 30, 2019. The other facility is a distribution facility which one of the Company’s subsidiaries, Dairyland, sublet from TCW Leasing Co., LLC (“TCW”), an entity controlled by the Company’s founders. The Company exited this facility on February 29, 2016 and is no longer required to pay rent.
Each of Christopher Pappas, CEO, John Pappas, Vice Chairman and Dean Facatselis owns 8.33% of a New York City-based restaurant customer of the Company and its subsidiaries that purchased approximately $31 and $29, respectively, of products from the Company during the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016 and $62 and $56, respectively, during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016. Messrs. Pappas and Facatselis have no other interest in the restaurant other than these equity interests and are not involved in the day-to-day operation or management of this restaurant.
The Company paid $30 and $139 to Architexture Studios, Inc. for interior decorating and design including the purchase of furniture and leasehold improvements primarily for its Las Vegas, San Francisco and Chicago facilities during the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016, respectively, and paid $68 and $268, respectively, during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016. This entity is owned by Julie Hardridge, the sister-in-law of Christopher Pappas.
The Company purchases products from ConAgra Foods, Inc. of which Steve Goldstone, a Director of the Company, is the Chairman. Mr. Goldstone became a director of the Company on March 7, 2016. The Company purchased approximately $152 and $184 worth of products from ConAgra Foods, Inc. during the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016, respectively, and $354 and $230, respectively, during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016.
With the acquisition of Del Monte, the Company acquired two warehouse facility leases that the Company leases from certain prior owners of Del Monte. Two of the owners are current employees, one of whom, John DeBenedetti, serves on the Company’s board of directors. The first property is located in American Canyon, CA and is owned by TJ Management Co. LLC, an entity owned 50% by John DeBenedetti. The Company paid rent on this facility totaling $54 and $53, respectively, for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016 and $107 and $105, respectively, during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016. The second property is located in West Sacramento, CA and is owned by David DeBenedetti and Victoria DeBenedetti, the parents of John DeBenedetti. The Company paid rent on this facility totaling $58 and $57, respectively, for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016 and $114 and $112, respectively, during the twenty-
15
six weeks June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016. John DeBenedetti and Victoria DeBenedetti are employees of a subsidiary of the Company.
John DeBenedetti, indirectly through TJ Investments, LLC, own a 8.33% ownership interest in Old World Provisions, which supplies products to the Company following the Del Monte acquisition. The Company purchased approximately $242 and $189, respectively, of products during the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016 and $428 and $337, respectively, during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016. Mr. J. DeBenedetti is not involved in the day-to-day management of Old World Provisions.
John Pappas’s brother-in-law, Constantine Papataros, is one of the Company’s employees. The Company paid him approximately $43 and $31 in total compensation, respectively, for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016 and $92 and $88, respectively, during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016. Christopher Pappas’s brother, John Pappas, is one of the Company’s employees and a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company paid John Pappas approximately $91 and $91 in total compensation, respectively, for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016 and $395 and $355, respectively, during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016. John Pappas did not receive any compensation during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 or June 24, 2016 for his service on the Company’s Board of Directors. Tara Brennan, the domestic partner of John DeBennedetti, is an employee of the Company and was paid approximately $42 and $45, respectively, for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016 and $90 and $90, respectively, during the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016.
An entity owned 50% by John Couri, a director of the Company, and of which Messrs. C. Pappas and S. Hanson (also directors of the Company) previously held ownership interests owns an interest in an aircraft that the Company uses for business purposes in the course of its operations. Mr. Couri paid for his ownership interest in the aircraft himself and bears his share of all operating, personnel and maintenance costs associated with the operation of this aircraft. This related party relationship ended during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. The Company paid $0 and $36 during the thirteen weeks and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017, respectively, for use of such aircraft in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. No payments were made during the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016.
Note 12 Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Twenty-six Weeks Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | ||||||
Supplemental cash flow disclosures: | |||||||
Cash (received) paid for income taxes | $ | (1,684 | ) | $ | 7,910 | ||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 9,947 | $ | 8,582 | |||
Non cash financing activities: | |||||||
Sinking funds used to retire debt | $ | 2,939 | $ | — |
Note 13 Commitments and Contingencies
Until February 29, 2016, the Company sublet a distribution facility from TCW (an entity controlled by the Company’s founders). TCW leases the distribution center from the New York City Industrial Development Agency. In connection with this sublease arrangement and TCW's obligations under a related mortgage to its mortgage lender, the Company, Dairyland and another of the Company’s subsidiaries initially were required to act as guarantors of TCW’s mortgage obligation on the distribution center. The mortgage payoff date is December 2029 and the potential obligation under this guarantee totaled $5,186 at June 30, 2017. By agreement dated July 1, 2005, the lender released the Company and its subsidiaries from their guaranty obligations, provided the sublease between Dairyland and TCW remained in full force and effect. As of February 29, 2016, Dairyland exited the sublease arrangement with TCW, triggering the guarantee obligation. The Company believes that the fair value of the building securing the mortgage more than offsets any potential obligation. In addition, TCW is actively pursuing business strategies that upon completion will unconditionally and fully release the Company from any guaranty of TCW’s mortgage loan.
16
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is provided as a supplement to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and footnotes to help provide an understanding of our financial condition, changes in our financial condition and results of operations. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with information included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 10, 2017. Unless otherwise indicated, the terms Company, Chefs’ Warehouse, we, us and our refer to The Chefs’ Warehouse, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All dollar amounts are in thousands.
OVERVIEW
We are a premier distributor of specialty foods in eight of the leading culinary markets in the United States. We offer more than 43,000 SKUs, ranging from high-quality specialty foods and ingredients to basic ingredients and staples and center-of-the-plate proteins. We serve more than 28,000 customer locations, primarily located in our 15 geographic markets across the United States and Canada, and the majority of our customers are independent restaurants and fine dining establishments. As a result of our acquisition of Allen Brothers, we also sell certain of our center-of-the-plate products directly to consumers.
We believe several key differentiating factors of our business model have enabled us to execute our strategy consistently and profitably across our expanding customer base. These factors consist of a portfolio of distinctive and hard-to-find specialty food products, an extensive selection of center-of-the-plate proteins, a highly trained and motivated sales force, strong sourcing capabilities, a fully integrated warehouse management system, a highly sophisticated distribution and logistics platform and a focused, seasoned management team.
In recent years, our sales to existing and new customers have increased through the continued growth in demand for specialty food products and center-of-the-plate products in general; increased market share driven by our large percentage of sophisticated and experienced sales professionals, our high-quality customer service and our extensive breadth and depth of product offerings, including, as a result of our acquisitions of Michael’s in August 2012, Allen Brothers in December 2013 and Del Monte in April 2015, meat, seafood and other center-of-the-plate products, and, as a result of our acquisition of Qzina in May 2013, gourmet chocolate, pastries and dessert; the acquisition of other specialty food and center-of-the-plate distributors; the expansion of our existing distribution centers; our entry into new distribution centers, including the construction of a new distribution center and our acquisition of MT Food in Chicago; and the import and sale of our proprietary brands. Through these efforts, we believe that we have been able to expand our customer base, enhance and diversify our product selections, broaden our geographic penetration and increase our market share.
RECENT ACQUISITIONS
On June 27, 2016, the Company acquired substantially all the assets of MT Food, a specialty food distributor based out of Chicago, IL. The aggregate purchase price for the transaction at acquisition date was $22,000, including an additional $500 payable eighteen months after the closing date and an earn-out of $500, paid during the second quarter of fiscal 2017. The final aggregate purchase price will be subject to the impact of a customary net working capital true-up.
Our Growth Strategies and Outlook
We continue to invest in our people, facilities and technology in an effort to achieve the following objectives and maintain our premier position within the specialty foodservice distribution market:
• | sales and service territory expansion; |
• | operational excellence and high customer service levels; |
• | expanded purchasing programs and improved buying power; |
• | product innovation and new product category introduction; |
• | operational efficiencies through system enhancements; and |
• | operating expense reduction through the centralization of general and administrative functions. |
Our growth has allowed us to improve upon our organization’s infrastructure, open new distribution facilities and pursue selective acquisitions. Over the last several years, we have increased our distribution capacity to approximately 1.3 million square feet in 24 distribution facilities at June 30, 2017. From the second half of fiscal 2013 through the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we have invested significantly in acquisitions, infrastructure and management.
17
Key Factors Affecting Our Performance
Due to our focus on menu-driven independent restaurants, fine dining establishments, country clubs, hotels, caterers, culinary schools, bakeries, patisseries, chocolatiers, cruise lines, casinos and specialty food stores, our results of operations are materially impacted by the success of the food-away-from-home industry in the United States and Canada, which is materially impacted by general economic conditions, weather, discretionary spending levels and consumer confidence. When economic conditions deteriorate, our customers businesses are negatively impacted as fewer people eat away-from-home and those who do spend less money. As economic conditions begin to improve, our customers’ businesses historically have likewise improved, which contributes to improvements in our business. Likewise, the direct-to-consumer business of our Allen Brothers subsidiary is significantly dependent on consumers’ discretionary spending habits, and weakness or uncertainty in the economy could lead to consumers buying less from Allen Brothers.
Volatile food costs may have a direct impact upon our profitability. Prolonged periods of product cost inflation may have a negative impact on our profit margins and results of operations to the extent we are unable to pass on all or a portion of such product cost increases to our customers. In addition, product cost inflation may negatively impact consumer discretionary spending decisions within our customers’ establishments, which could adversely impact our sales. Conversely, our profit levels may be negatively impacted during periods of product cost deflation even though our gross profit as a percentage of sales may remain relatively constant. However, some of our products, particularly certain of our protein items, are priced on a cost plus a dollar markup, which helps mitigate the negative impact of deflation.
Given our wide selection of product categories, as well as the continuous introduction of new products, we can experience shifts in product sales mix that have an impact on net sales and gross profit margins. This mix shift is most significantly impacted by the introduction of new categories of products in markets that we have more recently entered, the shift in product mix resulting from acquisitions, as well as the continued growth in item penetration on higher velocity items such as dairy products.
The foodservice distribution industry is fragmented but consolidating, and we have supplemented our internal growth through selective strategic acquisitions. We believe that the consolidation trends in the foodservice distribution industry will continue to present acquisition opportunities for us, which may allow us to grow our business at a faster pace than we would otherwise be able to grow the business organically.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, certain income and expense items expressed as a percentage of net sales:
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-six Weeks Ended | |||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | |||||||||
Net sales | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Cost of sales | 75.1 | % | 75.3 | % | 74.7 | % | 75.0 | % | ||||
Gross profit | 24.9 | % | 24.7 | % | 25.3 | % | 25.0 | % | ||||
Operating expenses | 21.2 | % | 20.8 | % | 22.8 | % | 22.0 | % | ||||
Operating income | 3.7 | % | 3.9 | % | 2.5 | % | 3.0 | % | ||||
Other expense | 1.8 | % | 8.8 | % | 1.9 | % | 5.3 | % | ||||
Income (loss) before income tax expense | 1.9 | % | (4.9 | )% | 0.6 | % | (2.3 | )% | ||||
Provision for income taxes | 0.8 | % | (2.1 | )% | 0.2 | % | (1.0 | )% | ||||
Net income (loss) | 1.1 | % | (2.8 | )% | 0.4 | % | (1.3 | )% |
Management evaluates the results of operations and cash flows using a variety of key performance indicators, including net sales compared to prior periods and internal forecasts, costs of our products and results of our cost-control initiatives, and use of operating cash. These indicators are discussed throughout the Results of Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources sections of this MD&A.
18
Thirteen Weeks Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Thirteen Weeks Ended June 24, 2016
Net Sales
Our net sales for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 increased approximately 13.9%, or $40,447, to $331,656 from $291,209 for the thirteen weeks ended June 24, 2016. Organic growth contributed $29.1 million, or 10.0% to sales growth in the quarter. The remaining sales growth of $11,347, or 3.9% resulted from the acquisition of MT Food on June 27, 2016. Compared to the second quarter of 2016, organic case count grew approximately 6.4%, while the number of unique customers and placements grew 4.5% and 6.1%, respectively, in our specialty business in the second quarter of 2017. Pounds sold in our protein division increased 1.2% for the second quarter of 2017 compared to the prior year quarter. Internally calculated inflation increased sequentially from the first quarter of 2017 and was approximately 3.8% during the quarter, consisting of 4.3% inflation in our specialty division and 2.8% in our protein division.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased approximately 15.0%, or $10,793, to $82,596 for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017, from $71,803 for the thirteen weeks ended June 24, 2016. Gross profit margin increased approximately 24 basis points to 24.9% from 24.7%, due in part to our increased mix of business in our specialty division. Gross profit margins increased approximately 12 basis points in our specialty division and increased approximately 12 basis points in our protein division.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses increased by approximately 16.2%, or $9,818, to $70,433 for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 from $60,615 for the thirteen weeks ended June 24, 2016. As a percentage of net sales, operating expenses were 21.2% in the second quarter of 2017 compared to 20.8% in the second quarter of 2016. The increase in the Company’s operating expense ratio is largely attributable to the impact of a prior year $1,470 gain upon the reduction of earn-out liabilities, increased warehouse labor costs of $1,279, higher fleet related expenses of $1,276, higher compensation costs related to the Company’s management infrastructure of $2,099 and increased bad debt expense of $523, offset in part by leverage on the Company’s workman's compensation, health insurance and facility costs.
Operating Income
Operating income for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 was $12,163 compared to $11,188 for the thirteen weeks ended June 24, 2016. As a percentage of net sales, operating income was 3.7% for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 compared to 3.9% for the thirteen weeks ended June 24, 2016. The increase in operating income was driven primarily from the higher gross profit discussed above, partially offset by higher operating expenses.
Interest Expense
Total interest expense decreased to $5,880 for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017 compared to $25,667 for the thirteen weeks ended June 24, 2016 due primarily to the prior year $22,310 prepayment penalty associated with the Company's debt refinancing in June 2016. Exclusive of the prepayment penalty, interest expense increased due to higher levels of debt associated with that refinancing.
Provision for Income Taxes
For the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017, we recorded an effective income tax rate of 41.5%. For the thirteen weeks ended June 24, 2016, our effective income tax rate was 41.6%.
Net Income (Loss)
Reflecting the factors described above, net income was $3,674 for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017, compared to net loss of $(8,455) for the thirteen weeks ended June 24, 2016.
Twenty-six Weeks Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Twenty-six Weeks Ended June 24, 2016
Net Sales
Our net sales for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 increased approximately 12.2%, or $67,301, to $619,346 from $552,045 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016. Organic growth contributed $44,057, or 8.0% to sales growth in the quarter. The remaining sales growth of $23,244, or 4.2% resulted from the acquisition of MT Food on June 27, 2016. Compared to the first half of 2016, organic case count grew approximately 6.2%, while the number of unique customers and placements grew 4.6% and 6.0%, respectively, in our specialty business in the first half of 2017. Pounds sold in our protein division increased 1.3% for the first half of 2017 compared to the prior year. Internally calculated inflation was approximately 2.2% during the 2017 period, consisting of 2.8% inflation in our specialty division and 1.2% in our protein division.
19
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased approximately 13.6%, or $18,739, to $156,500 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017, from $137,761 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016. Gross profit margin increased approximately 31 basis points to 25.3% from 25.0%. Gross profit margins increased approximately 9 basis points in our specialty division. Gross profit margins increased approximately 24 basis points in our protein division.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses increased by approximately 16.5%, or $20,003, to $141,216 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 from $121,213 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016. As a percentage of net sales, operating expenses were 22.8% in the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 compared to 22.0% in the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016. The increase in the Company’s operating expense ratio is largely attributable to the impact of prior year gains of $1,815 upon the reduction of the Company’s earn-out liabilities, increased warehouse compensation of $2,569, higher delivery labor costs of $2,615 and higher compensation and investments in additional management personnel of $4,657.
Operating Income
Operating income for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 was $15,284 compared to $16,548 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016. As a percentage of net sales, operating income was 2.5% for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 compared to 3.0% for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016. The decrease in operating income was driven primarily from the higher operating expenses discussed above partially offset by higher gross profit.
Interest Expense
Total interest expense decreased to $11,813 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 compared to $29,323 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016 due primarily to the prior year $22,310 prepayment penalty associated with the Company's debt refinancing in June 2016. This decrease was partially offset by increased interest expense due to higher levels of debt associated with that refinancing.
Provision for Income Taxes
For the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017, we recorded an effective income tax rate of 41.5%. For the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016, our effective income tax rate was 41.6%.
Net Income (Loss)
Reflecting the factors described above, net income was $2,032 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017, compared to net loss of $(7,462) for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016.
Product Category Sales Mix
The sales mix for the principal product categories for thirteen weeks and twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017 and June 24, 2016 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Twenty-six Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | June 30, 2017 | June 24, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center of the Plate | $ | 156,949 | 47 | % | $ | 145,592 | 50 | % | $ | 289,494 | 47 | % | $ | 271,121 | 49 | % | |||||||||||
Dry Goods | 57,859 | 17 | % | 48,790 | 17 | % | 107,581 | 17 | % | 93,559 | 17 | % | |||||||||||||||
Pastry | 43,901 | 13 | % | 36,439 | 13 | % | 84,829 | 14 | % | 71,859 | 13 | % | |||||||||||||||
Cheese | 25,725 | 8 | % | 22,797 | 8 | % | 48,748 | 8 | % | 43,183 | 8 | % | |||||||||||||||
Dairy | 22,551 | 7 | % | 15,565 | 5 | % | 42,030 | 7 | % | 29,336 | 5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Oils and Vinegar | 18,469 | 6 | % | 17,258 | 6 | % | 34,794 | 6 | % | 34,174 | 6 | % | |||||||||||||||
Kitchen Supplies | 6,202 | 2 | % | 4,768 | 1 | % | 11,870 | 1 | % | 8,813 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 331,656 | 100 | % | $ | 291,209 | 100 | % | $ | 619,346 | 100 | % | $ | 552,045 | 100 | % |
20
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We finance our day-to-day operations and growth primarily with cash flows from operations, borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities, operating leases, trade payables and bank indebtedness.
Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility
On June 22, 2016, Chefs’ Warehouse Parent, LLC (“CW Parent”) and Dairyland USA Corporation (“Dairyland”), as co-borrowers, and The Chefs’ Warehouse, Inc. (the “Company”) and certain other subsidiaries of the Company, as guarantors, entered into a credit agreement (the “Term Loan Credit Agreement”) with a group of lenders for which Jefferies Finance LLC (“Jefferies”) acts as administrative agent and collateral agent. The Term Loan Credit Agreement provides for a senior secured term loan B facility (the “Term Loan Facility”) in an aggregate amount of $305,000 with a $50,000 six-month delayed draw term loan facility (the “DDTL” the loans outstanding under the Term Loan Facility (including the DDTL), the “Term Loans”). Additionally, the Term Loan Facility includes an accordion which permits the Company to request that the lenders extend additional Term Loans in an aggregate principal amount of up to $50,000 (less the aggregate amount of certain indebtedness incurred to finance acquisitions) plus an unlimited amount Subject to the Company's consolidated Total Leverage Ration not exceeding 4.90:1.00 on a pro forma basis. Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility were used to repay the Company’s senior secured notes, as well as the prior term loan and revolving credit facility. Remaining funds will be used for capital expenditures, permitted acquisitions, working capital and general corporate purposes of the Company. On June 27, 2016, the Company drew $14,000 from the DDTL to help pay for the MT Food acquisition. On September 14, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment to the Term Loan Credit Agreement under which the remaining portion of the DDTL was terminated, the Company’s interest rate schedule was modified and the Company repaid $25,000 of the outstanding balance of the Term Loans. The interest rate on this facility at June 30, 2017 was 6.79%.
The final maturity of the Term Loan Facility is June 22, 2022. Subject to adjustment for prepayments, the Company is required to make quarterly amortization payments on the Term Loans in an amount equal to 0.25% of the aggregate principal amount of the Term Loans.
The interest rates per annum applicable to Term Loans, will be, at the co-borrowers’ option, equal to either a base rate or an adjusted LIBO rate for one, two, three, six or (if consented to by the lenders) twelve-month interest periods chosen by the Company, in each case plus an applicable margin percentage. A commitment fee is payable in respect of the amount of the undrawn DDTL commitments during the period the DDTL is available, equal to a percentage equal to 50% of the interest rate with respect to Term Loans accruing interest based on the adjusted LIBO rate.
The Term Loan Facility contains customary affirmative covenants, negative covenants (including restrictions, subject to customary exceptions, on incurring debt or liens, paying dividends, repaying payment subordinated and junior lien debt, disposing assets, and making investments and acquisitions), and events of default for a term loan B facility of this type, as more particularly described in the Term Loan Credit Agreement.
As of June 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants under the Term Loan Facility.
Asset Based Loan Facility
On June 22, 2016, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “ABL Credit Agreement”) with a group of lenders for which JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., acts as administrative agent and collateral agent. The ABL Credit Agreement provides for an asset based loan facility (the “ABL Facility”) in the aggregate amount of up to $75,000. Availability under the ABL Facility will be limited to a borrowing base consisting of the difference of (a) the lesser of: (i) the aggregate amount of commitments or (ii) the sum of specified percentages of eligible receivables and eligible inventory, minus certain availability reserves minus (b) outstanding borrowings. The co-borrowers under the ABL Facility are entitled on one or more occasions, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, to request an increase in the commitments under the ABL Facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $25,000. The ABL Facility matures on June 22, 2021.
The interest rates per annum applicable to loans, other than swingline loans, under the ABL Credit Facility will be, at the co-borrowers’ option, equal to either a base rate or an adjusted LIBO rate for one, two, three, six or (if consented to by the lenders) twelve-month, interest periods chosen by the Company, in each case plus an applicable margin percentage. The Company will pay certain recurring fees with respect to the ABL Facility, including fees on the unused commitments of the lenders.The ABL Facility contains customary affirmative covenants, negative covenants and events of default as more particularly described in the ABL Credit Agreement. The ABL Facility will require compliance with a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of 1:1 if the amount of availability under the ABL Facility falls below a specified dollar amount or percentage of the borrowing base.
21
There were no outstanding balances under the ABL as of June 30, 2017. Borrowings under the ABL Facility will be used, and are expected to be used, for capital expenditures, permitted acquisitions, working capital and general corporate purposes of the Company. As of June 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants and the Company had reserved $9,545 of the ABL facility for the issuance of letters of credit. As of June 30, 2017, funds totaling $65,455 were available for borrowing under the ABL facility.
Convertible Subordinated Notes
On April 6, 2015, the Company issued $36,750 principal amount of convertible subordinated notes with a six-year maturity bearing interest at 2.5% and a conversion price of $29.70 per share (the “Convertible Subordinated Notes”) to certain of the Del Monte entities as partial consideration in the Del Monte acquisition. The holders of the Convertible Subordinated Notes may, in certain instances beginning one year after issuance, redeem the Convertible Subordinated Notes for cash or shares of the Company’s common stock. Moreover, the Company may pay the outstanding principal amount due and owing under the Convertible Subordinated Notes at maturity in either cash or shares of the Company’s common stock. Interest is payable annually in cash with the first interest payment due on April 6, 2016. The Convertible Subordinated Notes, which are subordinate to the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ senior debt, are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock by the holders at any time at a conversion price of $29.70.
Liquidity
We believe our capital expenditures, excluding cash paid for acquisitions, for fiscal 2017 will be approximately $11,000. The significant decrease in projected capital expenditures in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016 is the result of the completion of the renovation and expansion of our new Bronx, NY and Las Vegas, NV distribution facilities. Recurring capital expenditures will be financed with cash generated from operations and borrowings under our ABL Facility. Our planned capital projects will provide both new and expanded facilities and improvements to our technology that we believe will produce increased efficiency and the capacity to continue to support the growth of our customer base. Future investments and acquisitions will be financed through either internally generated cash flow, borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities in place at the time of the potential investment or acquisition or through the issuance of equity or debt securities, including, but not limited to, longer-term, fixed-rate debt securities and shares of our common stock.
On June 27, 2016, the Company acquired substantially all the assets of MT Food, a specialty food distributor based out of Chicago, IL. The aggregate cash purchase price for the transaction at acquisition date was $21,000, exclusive of an additional $500 payable eighteen months after the closing date and an earn-out of $500, paid during the second quarter of fiscal 2017. The final aggregate purchase price will be subject to the impact of a customary net working capital true-up. The acquisition was paid for with cash on hand and drawdown of our delayed draw term loan facility.
On April 26, 2017, the Company repaid its New Markets Tax Credit Loan in full, inclusive of accrued interest outstanding, for $11,009, of which, $8,070 was paid in cash and $2,939 was paid from the associated sinking fund.
Net cash provided by operations was $21,676 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017, an increase of $18,375 from the $3,301 provided by operations for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016. The primary reasons for the increase in net cash provided by operations was cash generated by working capital changes, partially offset by decreased cash generated through net income. The increase in cash provided by changes in working capital was primarily due to increases in cash provided by accounts payable changes and prepaid expenses and other current assets changes of $28,462 and $16,103, respectively, partially offset by an increase in cash used in accounts receivable changes and inventory changes of $6,137 and $10,413, respectively. During the first twenty-six weeks of fiscal 2017 net income increased by $9,494. The primary cause for this increase in net income was a decrease in interest expense of $17,510 as a result of our debt refinancing on June 22, 2016.
Net cash used in investing activities was $6,370 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017, a decrease of $1,664 from the net cash used in investing activities of $8,034 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016. The decrease in net cash used was primarily due to lower capital expenditures.
Net used in financing activities was $11,263 for the twenty-six weeks ended June 30, 2017, a decrease of $61,525 from the $50,262 provided by financing activities for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016. This decrease was primarily due to the cash generated by our debt refinancing on June 22, 2016 offset by net payments of $93,382 on our revolving credit facility in the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2016 and the repayment of the New Markets Tax credit Loan in the second quarter of 2017.
Seasonality
Excluding our direct-to-consumer business, we generally do not experience any material seasonality. However, our sales and operating results may vary from quarter to quarter due to factors such as changes in our operating expenses, management’s
22
ability to execute our operating and growth strategies, personnel changes, demand for our products, supply shortages, weather patterns and general economic conditions.
Our direct-to-consumer business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, with direct-to-consumer center-of-the-plate protein sales typically higher during the holiday season in our fourth quarter; accordingly, a disproportionate amount of operating cash flows from this portion of our business is generated by our direct-to-consumer business in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year. Despite a significant portion of these sales occurring in the fourth quarter, there are operating expenses, principally advertising and promotional expenses, throughout the year.
Inflation
Our profitability is dependent on, among other things, our ability to anticipate and react to changes in the costs of key operating resources, including food and other raw materials, labor, energy and other supplies and services. Substantial increases in costs and expenses could impact our operating results to the extent that such increases cannot be passed along to our customers. The impact of inflation and deflation on food, labor, energy and occupancy costs can significantly affect the profitability of our operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2017, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires it to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The SEC has defined critical accounting policies as those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require its most difficult, complex or subjective judgments or estimates. Based on this definition, we believe our critical accounting policies include the following: (i) determining the allowance for doubtful accounts, (ii) inventory valuation, with regard to determining the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory, (iii) valuing goodwill and intangible assets, (iv) vendor rebates and other promotional incentives, (v) self-insurance reserves, (vi) accounting for income taxes and (vii) contingent earn-out liabilities. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates as compared to our critical accounting policies and estimates described in the Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2017.
23
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
As of June 30, 2017, we had $290.0 million of indebtedness outstanding under the Senior Secured Term Loan and $1.4 million outstanding under a software financing agreement that bore interest at variable rates. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would decrease our after tax earnings by approximately $1.7 million per annum, holding other variables constant.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. The evaluation included certain internal control areas in which we have made and are continuing to make changes to improve and enhance controls. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal period that may have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
24
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising out of the ordinary conduct of our business. Although we cannot assure the outcome, management presently believes that the result of such legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements, and no material amounts have been accrued in our consolidated financial statements with respect to these matters.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There has been no material changes with respect to the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2017.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Total Number of Shares Repurchased(1) | Average Price Paid Per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |||||||||
April 1, 2017 to April 28, 2017 | 4,538 | $ | 13.55 | — | — | |||||||
April 29, 2017 to May 25, 2017 | 1,044 | $ | 13.70 | — | — | |||||||
May 26, 2017 to June 30, 2017 | 218 | $ | 15.20 | — | — | |||||||
Total | 5,800 | $ | 13.64 | — | — |
(1) | During the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2017, we withheld 5,800 shares to satisfy tax withholding requirements upon the vesting of restricted shares of our common stock awarded to our officers and key employees. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
25
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. | Description | ||
31.1 | |||
31.2 | |||
32.1 | |||
32.2 | |||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | ||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | ||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | ||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | ||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | ||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on August 9, 2017.
THE CHEFS’ WAREHOUSE, INC. | |||
(Registrant) | |||
August 9, 2017 | /s/ John D. Austin | ||
Date | John D. Austin | ||
Chief Financial Officer | |||
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal | |||
Accounting Officer) | |||
26