CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2008 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
_______________________________
FORM 10 - Q
_______________________________
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934.
For the quarterly period ended March
31, 2008
000-30379
(Commission File
Number)
Chembio Diagnostics,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
|
88-0425691
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification
Number)
|
3661 Horseblock
Road
Medford, New York 11763
(Address of principal executive
offices including zip code)
(631) 924-1135
(Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code)
(Former Name or Former Address, if
Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes X No
_____
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”,
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [
]
Accelerated filer [
]
Non-accelerated filer [
]
Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ____
No X
As of May
12, 2008, the Registrant had 60,537,534 shares outstanding of its $.01 par value
common stock.
Quarterly Report on FORM 10-Q For The
Period Ended
March 31, 2008
Table of Contents
Chembio Diagnostics,
Inc.
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
Part I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
|
||
|
Item
1. Financial Statements:
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2008 (unaudited) and December 31,
2007.
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007.
|
F-3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007.
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
F-5
to F-11
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4T. Controls and Procedures
|
9
|
|
|
|
Part
II. OTHER INFORMATION:
|
||
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
10
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
EXHIBITS
|
|
F - 1
PART I
Item 1. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
AS
OF
|
||||||||
- ASSETS
-
|
||||||||
March 31,
2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||
(UNAUDITED)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ |
1,764,735
|
$ |
2,827,369
|
||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $26,052 and $10,045
for 2008 and 2007, respectively
|
952,894
|
946,340
|
||||||
Inventories
|
1,505,451
|
1,453,850
|
||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
315,325
|
243,748
|
||||||
TOTAL CURRENT
ASSETS
|
4,538,405
|
5,471,307
|
||||||
FIXED ASSETS, net of
accumulated depreciation
|
932,750
|
829,332
|
||||||
OTHER
ASSETS:
|
||||||||
License
agreements, net of current portion
|
1,115,754
|
255,948
|
||||||
Deposits
and other assets
|
28,410
|
28,410
|
||||||
$ |
6,615,319
|
$ |
6,584,997
|
|||||
- LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY -
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
$ |
1,991,946
|
$ |
2,175,791
|
||||
Deferred
research and development revenue
|
30,833
|
43,334
|
||||||
Current
portion of license fee payable
|
375,000
|
-
|
||||||
Current
portion of obligations under capital leases
|
18,650
|
23,458
|
||||||
TOTAL CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
2,416,429
|
2,242,583
|
||||||
OTHER
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Obligations
under capital leases - net of current portion
|
75,131
|
79,588
|
||||||
License
fee payable - net of current portion
|
500,000
|
-
|
||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
2,991,560
|
2,322,171
|
||||||
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY:
|
||||||||
Common
stock - $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized 60,537,534 shares
issued and outstanding as of 2008 and 2007
|
605,375
|
605,375
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
39,162,263
|
39,003,148
|
||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(36,143,879 | ) | (35,345,697 | ) | ||||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
3,623,759
|
4,262,826
|
||||||
$ |
6,615,319
|
$ |
6,584,997
|
|||||
See accompanying
notes
|
F - 2
CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
||||||||
FOR THE THREE-MONTHS
ENDED
|
||||||||
(UNAUDITED)
|
||||||||
March 31,
2008
|
March
31, 2007
|
|||||||
REVENUES:
|
||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ |
2,237,971
|
$ |
2,025,322
|
||||
Research
grant income
|
126,757
|
12,998
|
||||||
TOTAL
REVENUES
|
2,364,728
|
2,038,320
|
||||||
Cost
of sales
|
1,302,806
|
1,378,501
|
||||||
GROSS
PROFIT
|
1,061,922
|
659,819
|
||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
|
||||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
626,336
|
318,730
|
||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
1,247,154
|
1,252,226
|
||||||
1,873,490
|
1,570,956
|
|||||||
LOSS FROM
OPERATIONS
|
(811,568 | ) | (911,137 | ) | ||||
OTHER INCOME
(EXPENSES):
|
||||||||
Other
income
|
-
|
133,008
|
||||||
Interest
income
|
18,979
|
52,321
|
||||||
Interest
expense
|
(5,593 | ) | (2,997 | ) | ||||
13,386
|
182,332
|
|||||||
LOSS BEFORE INCOME
TAXES
|
(798,182 | ) | (728,805 | ) | ||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
NET LOSS
|
(798,182 | ) | (728,805 | ) | ||||
Dividends
payable in stock to preferred stockholders
|
-
|
353,979
|
||||||
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO
COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
|
$ | (798,182 | ) | $ | (1,082,784 | ) | ||
Basic and diluted loss per
share
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
Weighted average number of
shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
60,537,534
|
11,717,079
|
||||||
See accompanying
notes
|
F - 3
CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED
|
||||||||
(UNAUDITED)
|
||||||||
March 31,
2008
|
March
31, 2007
|
|||||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Cash
received from customers
|
$ |
2,358,174
|
$ |
2,336,931
|
||||
Cash
paid to suppliers and employees
|
(3,245,657 | ) | (2,796,292 | ) | ||||
Interest
received
|
18,979
|
52,321
|
||||||
Interest
paid
|
(5,593 | ) | (2,997 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
(874,097 | ) | (410,037 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Acquisition
of fixed assets
|
(179,272 | ) | (22,415 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
(179,272 | ) | (22,415 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of warrants
|
-
|
31,000
|
||||||
Payment
of accrued interest
|
-
|
(30,000 | ) | |||||
Payment
of capital lease obligation
|
(9,265 | ) | (10,269 | ) | ||||
Net cash utilized by financing
activities
|
(9,265 | ) | (9,269 | ) | ||||
NET (DECREASE) IN
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(1,062,634 | ) | (441,721 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents - beginning of the period
|
2,827,369
|
4,290,386
|
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents - end
of the period
|
$ |
1,764,735
|
$ |
3,848,665
|
||||
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME TO
NET CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (798,182 | ) | $ | (728,805 | ) | ||
Adjustments:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
75,854
|
67,503
|
||||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
16,000
|
10,987
|
||||||
Common
stock, options and warrants issued as compensation
|
174,090
|
16,408
|
||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(22,554 | ) |
287,624
|
|||||
Inventories
|
(51,601 | ) | (192,191 | ) | ||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(86,552 | ) |
9,510
|
|||||
Other
assets and deposits
|
(859,806 | ) |
11,896
|
|||||
License
fee payable
|
875,000
|
-
|
||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
(12,501 | ) |
-
|
|||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(183,845 | ) |
107,031
|
|||||
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
$ | (874,097 | ) | $ | (410,037 | ) | ||
Supplemental disclosures for
non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
Value
of warrants issued allocated to additional paid-in capital
|
-
|
20,000
|
||||||
Accreted
dividend to preferred stock
|
-
|
353,979
|
||||||
Value
of Common stock issued as payment of dividend
|
-
|
262,053
|
||||||
Value
of Preferred stock converted to common stock
|
-
|
20,925
|
||||||
See accompanying
notes
|
F - 4
CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
MARCH 31,
2008
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE1—DESCRIPTION OF
BUSINESS:
Chembio
Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company” or “Chembio”) and its subsidiaries develop,
manufacture, and market rapid diagnostic tests that detect infectious diseases.
The Company’s main products presently commercially available are three rapid
tests for the detection of HIV antibodies in whole blood, serum and plasma
samples, two of which were approved by the FDA in 2006; the third is sold for
export only. The Company also has a rapid test for Chagas disease (a
parasitic disease endemic in Latin America) as well as a line of rapid tests for
veterinary tuberculosis, the first one of which is USDA
approved. The Company’s products are sold to medical
laboratories and hospitals, governmental and public health entities,
non-governmental organizations, medical professionals and retail establishments.
Chembio’s products are sold under the Company’s STAT PAK® or SURE CHECK ®
registered trademarks or under the private labels of its marketing partners,
such as is the case with the Clearview® label owned by Inverness Medical
Innovations, Inc., which is the Company’s exclusive marketing partner for its
rapid HIV test products in the United States. The preceding products
employ lateral flow technologies that are proprietary and/or licensed to the
Company. All of the Company’s future products are based on its
patented Dual Path Platform (DPP™), which is a unique point of care platform
that has certain advantages over lateral flow technology. The Company
has a number of products under development that employ the DPP™.
NOTE2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
(a)
|
Basis of
Presentation:
|
The
consolidated interim financial information as of March 31, 2008 and for the
three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 have been prepared
without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America,
have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although
we believe that the disclosures made are adequate to provide for fair
presentation. The interim financial information should be read in
conjunction with the Financial Statements and the notes thereto, included in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007, previously filed with the SEC.
In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (which include normal recurring
adjustments) necessary to present a fair statement of consolidated financial
position as of March 31, 2008, and consolidated results of operations, and cash
flows for the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, as applicable,
have been made. The interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative
of the operating results for the full fiscal year or any future
periods.
(b)
|
Inventories:
|
Inventory consists of the following at:
March 31,
2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||
Raw
Materials
|
$ |
612,498
|
$ |
705,873
|
||||
Work in
Process
|
390,935
|
234,077
|
||||||
Finished
Goods
|
502,018
|
513,900
|
||||||
$ |
1,505,451
|
$ |
1,453,850
|
F - 5
CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
MARCH 31,
2008
(UNAUDITED)
(c)
|
Earnings Per
Share
|
The
following weighted average number of shares was used for the computation of
basic and diluted loss per share:
For the three months
ended
|
||||||||
March 31,
2008
|
March
31, 2007
|
|||||||
Basic
|
60,537,534
|
11,717,079
|
||||||
Diluted
|
60,537,534
|
11,717,079
|
Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common
stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution from the exercise
or conversion of other securities into Common Stock, but only if dilutive.
Diluted loss per share for the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
is the same as basic loss per share, since the effects of the calculation were
anti-dilutive due to the fact that the Company incurred losses for all periods
presented. The following securities, presented on a common share equivalent
basis, have been excluded from the per share computations:
For the three months
ended
|
||||||||
March 31,
2008
|
March
31, 2007
|
|||||||
1999 Plan Stock
Options
|
2,291,269
|
1,621,750
|
||||||
Other Stock
Options
|
124,625
|
124,625
|
||||||
Warrants
|
19,487,099
|
23,114,990
|
||||||
Convertible Preferred
Stock
|
-
|
17,574,184
|
(d)
|
Employee Stock Option
Plan:
|
Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company’s Plan is accounted for in accordance with the
recognition and measurement provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards Share-Based Payment ("FAS 123(R)"), which replaces FAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes Accounting Principles
Board Opinion ("APB") No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and
related interpretations. FAS 123(R) requires compensation costs related to
share-based payment transactions, including employee stock options, to be
recognized in the financial statements. In addition, the Company adheres to the
guidance set forth within SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 ("SAB
107"), which provides the Staff's views regarding the interaction between SFAS
No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides interpretations
with respect to the valuation of share-based payments for public
companies.
As a
result of the adoption of FAS 123(R), the Company's results for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 include share-based compensation expense
totaling $159,000 and $16,000, respectively. Such amounts have been
included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations within cost of
goods sold ($19,000 and none, respectively), research and development ($59,000
and $1,000, respectively) and selling, general and administrative expenses
($81,000 and $15,000, respectively). No income tax benefit has been
recognized in the income statement for share-based compensation arrangements due
to the history of operating losses.
Stock
option compensation expense in the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and
2007 represent the estimated fair value of options outstanding which are
being amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting period of
the entire award.
The
weighted average estimated fair value of stock options granted in the three
month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $.42 and $.52 per share,
respectively. The fair value of options at the date of grant was
estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expected volatility
is based upon historical volatility of our stock and other contributing factors.
The expected term is determined using the simplified method as permitted by SAB
107, as the Company has no history of employee exercise of options
to-date.
F - 6
CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
MARCH 31,
2008
(UNAUDITED)
The
assumptions made in calculating the fair values of options are as
follows:
For the three months
ended
|
||||
March 31,
2008
|
March
31, 2007
|
|||
Expected term (in
years)
|
1 to
4
|
5
|
||
Expected
volatility
|
109.33%
|
104.80%
|
||
Expected dividend
yield
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
||
Risk-free interest
rate
|
1.91 to
2.46%
|
4.50%
|
The
Company granted 534,000 options under the Plan during the three months ended
March 31, 2008 at exercise prices ranging from $.15 to $0.22 per
share. On February 15, 2008 the Compensation Committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors approved the reduction of the exercise price to
$.48 of all employee options where the exercise price was greater than $.48 per
share (an aggregate of 1,846,500 options) . The expense related to
this modification in the first quarter of 2008 was $18,000.
The
following table provides stock option activity for the three months ended March
31, 2008:
Stock
Options
|
Number
of Shares
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price per Share
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|||||||||
Outstanding at December 31,
2007
|
2,201,500
|
$ |
0.64
|
3.52
years
|
$ |
-
|
|||||||
Impact of re-price
(for accounting purposes treated as a cancelation and
re-issue):
|
|||||||||||||
effect
as if cancelled
|
(1,846,500 | ) | $ |
0.64
|
|||||||||
effect
as if re-issiued
|
1,846,500
|
$ |
0.48
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
534,000
|
$ |
0.22
|
||||||||||
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Forfeited/expired
|
(255,000 | ) | $ |
0.73
|
|||||||||
Outstanding at March 31,
2008
|
2,480,500
|
$ |
0.54
|
3.71
years
|
$ |
-
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Exercisable at March 31,
2008
|
1,836,500
|
$ |
0.42
|
3.55
years
|
$ |
-
|
As of
March 31, 2008, there was $150,000 of net unrecognized compensation cost related
to stock options that had not vested, which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of approximately 1.33 years. The total fair
value of stock options vested during the three-month periods ended March 31,
2008 and 2007, was approximately $139,000 and $186,000,
respectively.
(e)
|
Geographic
Information:
|
SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” establishes
standards for the way that business enterprises report information about
operating segments in financial statements and requires that those enterprises
report selected information. It also establishes standards for related
disclosures about product and services, geographic areas, and major
customers.
F - 7
CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
MARCH 31,
2008
(UNAUDITED)
The
Company produces only one group of similar products known collectively as “rapid
medical tests”. As per the provisions of SFAS 131, management believes that it
operates in a single business segment. Net sales by geographic area are as
follows:
For the three months
ended
|
||||||||
March 31,
2008
|
March
31, 2007
|
|||||||
Africa (excluding
Nigeria)
|
$ |
437,060
|
$ |
166,124
|
||||
Nigeria
|
849,702
|
202,500
|
||||||
Asia
|
101,009
|
41,213
|
||||||
Europe
|
43,940
|
27,011
|
||||||
Middle
East
|
100,841
|
118,959
|
||||||
North
America
|
635,765
|
1,460,925
|
||||||
South
America
|
69,654
|
8,590
|
||||||
$ |
2,237,971
|
$ |
2,025,322
|
(f)
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities consist of:
March 31,
2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||
Accounts payable –
suppliers
|
$ |
670,552
|
$ |
726,174
|
||||
Accrued
commissions
|
34,857
|
14,251
|
||||||
Accrued royalties /
licenses
|
752,421
|
852,119
|
||||||
Accrued
payroll
|
146,568
|
279,598
|
||||||
Accrued
vacation
|
133,250
|
155,480
|
||||||
Accrued legal and
accounting
|
135,865
|
10,000
|
||||||
Accrued expenses –
other
|
118,433
|
138,169
|
||||||
TOTAL
|
$ |
1,991,946
|
$ |
2,175,791
|
(g)
|
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements affecting the
Company
|
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements,
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value
measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a
fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. SFAS
No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and all interim periods within those fiscal years. In February 2008, the FASB
released FASB Staff Position (FSP FAS 157-2 – Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157) which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis (at least annually), to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and
interim periods within those fiscal years. The implementation of SFAS
No. 157 for financial assets and liabilities, effective January 1,
2008, did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position and
results of operations. The Company is currently evaluating the impact
of adoption of this statement on its non-financial assets and liabilities in
which is expected to be determined by the first quarter of fiscal
2009.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159
permits entities to choose to measure, on an item-by-item basis, specified
financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value
option has been elected are required to be reported in earnings at each
reporting date. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007, the provisions of which are required to be applied
prospectively. The Company adopted this Statement as of January 1,
2008 and has elected not to apply the fair value option to any of its financial
instruments.
F - 8
CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
MARCH 31,
2008
(UNAUDITED)
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141 (revised
2007), Business Combinations, which replaces SFAS No 141. The statement retains
the purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, but requires a number of
changes, including changes in the way assets and liabilities are recognized in
the purchase accounting. It also changes the recognition of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, requires the capitalization of
in-process research and development at fair value, and requires the expensing of
acquisition-related costs as incurred. SFAS No. 141R is effective
for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December
15, 2008.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an Amendment of ARB No.
51.” SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards
pertaining to ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the
parent, the amount of net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest, and the
valuation of any retained noncontrolling equity investment when a subsidiary is
deconsolidated. This statement also establishes disclosure
requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the
parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15,
2008. The adoption of SFAS 160 is not currently expected to have a
material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
In March
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No.
161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” The new standard is intended to improve
financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by
requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their
effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash
flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application
encouraged. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS. No.
161 on its financial statements.
(h)
|
License
Agreement
|
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company entered into a sublicense
agreement (see Note 3) for which it has recorded an asset of
$1,000,000. This asset is being amortized over an estimated
beneficial life of ten years. The current portion of this
amortization is $100,000 and is reflected in current assets. The
unamortized balance as of March 31, 2008 is $875,000 and is reflected in other
assets along with other unamortized long-term license fees of
$240,754.
NOTE3—LICENSE FEE
PAYABLE:
In
February 2008, the Company entered into a sublicense agreement (the “Agreement”)
with Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. and Bio-Rad Pasteur (collectively,
“Bio-Rad”). Bio-Rad is the exclusive licensee of Institute Pasteur of
Paris, France, for HIV-2 patents. Pursuant to the terms of the
Agreement, Bio-Rad sublicensed to the Company patents related to the use of
HIV-2. In exchange for the use of the patents, the Agreement provides
that the Company will pay Bio-Rad a $1,000,000 sublicense fee, $500,000 payable
during 2008, of which $125,000 has been paid and $500,000 payable in
2009. The Company will also pay Bio-Rad a royalty on net sales in the
United States and Canada of rapid test immunoassay tests sold under the
Company’s name (a) for simultaneously detecting “HIV type 1 + HIV type 2”
antibodies and/or antigens; (b) being operated with the Company’s Point of Care
Rapid Test Platform; and (c) allowing visual and automated signal reading and
interpretation through a single test unit format. The Company will be
manufacturing products under the sublicense agreement immediately, but it does
not currently have any sales that are subject to the royalty. The Agreement will
continue until the expiration of the last-to-expire of the sublicensed patents,
unless otherwise terminated at an earlier date by the Company or Bio-Rad, and is
being amortized over 10 years.
F - 9
CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
MARCH 31,
2008
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE4—COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES:
(a)
|
Economic
Dependency:
|
The
Company had sales to three customers in excess of 10% of total sales in the
three months ended March 31, 2008. Sales to these customers
approximated $782,000, $541,000 and $272,000, respectively. This
represents approximately 71% of net sales. Accounts receivable as of March 31,
2008 from these customers approximated $258,000, $317,000 and none,
respectively.
The
Company had sales to three customers in excess of 10% of total sales in the
three months ended March 31, 2007. Sales to these customers
approximated $1,004,000, $345,000 and $286,000, respectively. This
represents approximately 81% of net sales. Accounts receivable as of March 31,
2007 from these customers approximated $432,000, $278,000 and $286,000,
respectively.
The
Company had purchases from one vendor in excess of 10% of total purchases for
the three months ended March 31, 2008. Purchases from this vendor
approximated $118,000. Accounts payable as of March 31, 2008 to this
vendor approximated $10,000.
The
Company had purchases from one vendor in excess of 10% of total purchases for
the three months ended March 31, 2007. Purchases from this vendor
approximated $147,000. Accounts payable as of March 31, 2007 to this
vendor approximated $51,000.
(b)
|
Governmental
Regulation:
|
All of
the Company’s existing and proposed diagnostic products are regulated by the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, certain state
and local agencies, and/or comparable regulatory bodies in other
countries. Most aspects of development, production, and marketing,
including product testing, authorizations to market, labeling, promotion,
manufacturing, and record keeping are subject to review. After
marketing approval has been granted, Chembio must continue to comply with
governmental regulations. Failure to comply with these regulations
can result in significant penalties.
(c)
|
Nigeria
Algorithm:
|
During
the first quarter we were informed that our designation in Nigeria as one of the
screening tests has changed to that of the confirmatory test as this country
moves from a parallel to a serial testing algorithm (a testing algorithm is a
protocol defining how selected tests are used. In a parallel
algorithm two tests are used simultaneously, while in a serial algorithm a
screen test is performed first and if positive a second confirmatory test is
run) by the end of 2008. Consequently, after shipment of outstanding
orders, we expect our sales to Nigeria to decrease in the balance of
2008.
(d)
|
Voluntary Component
Recall
|
In April
2008, we initiated a voluntary recall of two lots of Control kits used with our
HIV 1-2 Stat Pak® Assay distributed by Inverness under its Clearview® brand.
Control kits are to be used in order to verify the operator’s ability to
properly perform the test and to interpret the results. These kits are supplied
directly to Inverness by our vendor in accordance with our specifications and
instructions. In the case of these two lots of Control kits, although
they met our specifications, they were at the lower limit of such
specifications, and this produced some issues with the interpretation of the
control kit results by certain customers. Chembio has provided the kit supplier
with a more clearly defined specification and has reviewed copies of revised
manufacturing and testing procedures to ensure implementation of the new
specification. Based upon these new specifications, packaged HIV Rapid Test
Control Packs containing the new HIV Controls were ready for customer
distribution. We have classified this recall as Class III recall “a situation in
which there is little chance that using or being exposed to the device will
cause health problems”. We have taken a reserve for potential
costs related to this recall of $40,000.
F - 10
CHEMBIO DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
MARCH 31,
2008
(UNAUDITED)
(e)
|
DPP™
Agreements:
|
a.
|
Bio-Manguinhos:
|
On
January 29th 2008 we signed three new technology transfer, supply and license
agreements with the Bio-Manguinhos unit of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation of Brazil
for products we are completing development of on DPP™. Two
products being developed will be used in screening programs funded by Brazil’s
Ministry of Health for the control and eradication of Leishmaniasis and
Leptospirosis, respectively, which are both blood-borne infectious diseases that
are endemic to Brazil. A third test being developed is for the
confirmation of HIV-1 in patients who have tested positive with a screening
test. Under these agreements once the three products are approved for
sale in Brazil, which we anticipated to be well before year end 2008, Chembio
will receive approximately $500,000 in royalty payments, and will also begin to
receive purchase orders during the succeeding 12 month period of at least
approximately $2 million based upon the aggregate minimum purchase amounts under
these agreements. We expect these initial DPP™ product revenues to occur this
year. Thereafter, following this 12 month period the agreement allows
for production of the products to be transferred to Brazil, subject to certain
royalty payments. These agreements are similar to Chembio’s 2004 agreement with
this Bio-Manguinhos for one of our rapid HIV tests.
b.
|
Bio-Rad:
|
On April
16, 2008 we announced a new development agreement with Bio-Rad Laboratories,
Inc., one of the world’s leading in vitro diagnostic and life science
companies. The agreement with Bio-Rad is for the development of a new
multiplex product that would be developed on DPP™ and which would be marketed
exclusively by Bio-Rad under a limited DPP™ license from Chembio.
F - 11
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Overview
This
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes. Our discussion
and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon
our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosure of any contingent liabilities at the financial statement date and
reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an
on-going basis we review our estimates and assumptions. Our estimates were based
on our historical experience and other assumptions that we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results are likely to differ from
those estimates under different assumptions or conditions, but we do not believe
such differences will materially affect our financial position or results of
operations. Our critical accounting policies, the policies we believe are most
important to the presentation of our financial statements and require the most
difficult, subjective and complex judgments, are outlined below in ‘‘Critical
Accounting Policies,’’ and have not changed significantly from December 31,
2007.
In
addition, certain statements made in this report may constitute “forward-looking
statements”. These forward-looking statements involve known or
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual
results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different
from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements. Specifically, 1) our ability to obtain necessary
regulatory approvals for our products; and 2) our ability to increase revenues
and operating income, is dependent upon our ability to develop and sell our
products, general economic conditions, and other factors. You can identify
forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “could”, “will,”
“should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,”
“predicts,” “potential,” “continues” or the negative of these terms or other
comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected-in
the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future
results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.
Except as
may be required by applicable law, we do not undertake or intend to update or
revise our forward-looking statements, and we assume no obligation to update any
forward-looking statements contained in this report as a result of new
information or future events or developments. Thus, you should not
assume that our silence over time means that actual events are bearing out as
expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. You should
carefully review and consider the various disclosures we make in this report and
our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that attempt
to advise interested parties of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that
may affect our business.
The
following management discussion and analysis relates to the business of the
Company and its subsidiaries, which develop, manufacture, and market rapid
diagnostic tests that detect infectious diseases. The Company’s main products
presently commercially available are three rapid tests for the detection of HIV
antibodies in whole blood, serum and plasma samples, two of which were approved
by the FDA in 2006; the third is sold for export only. The Company
also has a rapid test for Chagas disease (a parasitic disease endemic in Latin
America) as well as a line of rapid tests for tuberculosis, including tests for
tuberculosis in animals which is USDA approved. The Company’s
products are sold to medical laboratories and hospitals, governmental and public
health entities, non-governmental organizations, medical professionals and
retail establishments. Chembio’s products are sold either under the Company’s
STAT-PAK® or SURE CHECK® registered trademarks or under the private labels of
its marketing partners, such as is the case with the Clearview® label owned by
Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc., (“Inverness”) which is the Company’s
exclusive marketing partner for its rapid HIV test products in the United
States. The preceding products employ lateral flow technologies that
are proprietary and/or licensed to the Company. All of the Company’s
future products are based on its patented Dual Path Platform (DPP™), which is a
unique point of care platform that has certain advantages over lateral flow
technology. The Company has a number of products under development
that employ the DPP™.
Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates
We
believe that there are several accounting policies that are critical to
understanding our historical and future performance, as these policies affect
the reported amounts of revenue and the more significant areas involving
management’s judgments and estimates. These significant accounting policies
relate to revenue recognition, research and development costs, valuation of
inventory, valuation of long-lived assets, accounting for complex financial
instruments and income taxes. For a summary of our significant accounting
policies, which have not changed from December 31, 2007, see our
annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, which was
filed with the SEC on March 12, 2008.
1
Recent Events
On
December 19, 2007 (the “Closing Date”) amendments to the governing documents for
the Company’s Series A, Series B and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
(collectively, the “Preferred Stock”) and for certain warrants and options
(collectively, the “Non-Employee Warrants”) not including options or warrants
issued to employees or directors in their capacity as such (these actions
collectively, the “Plan”) were approved by the Company and the requisite
percentages of the holders of the Preferred Stock and of the Non-Employee
Warrants. Subsequent to these amendments, among other matters, all the
Preferred Stock and certain of the Non-Employee Warrants were converted to
shares of the Company’s common stock. A description of the terms of
the Plan is included in Note 1 of our annual report on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended December 31, 2007 which was filed with the SEC on March 12,
2008.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2008 AS COMPARED WITH THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2007
Revenues:
Selected Product
Categories:
|
For the three months
ended
|
|||||||||||||||
March 31,
2008
|
March 31,
2007
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||||
HIV
|
$ |
1,920,986
|
$ |
1,811,365
|
$ |
109,621
|
6.05 | % | ||||||||
TB
|
95,155
|
27,300
|
67,855
|
248.55 | % | |||||||||||
Other
|
221,830
|
186,657
|
35,173
|
18.84 | % | |||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
2,237,971
|
2,025,322
|
212,649
|
10.50 | % | |||||||||||
Research grant
income
|
126,757
|
12,998
|
113,759
|
875.20 | % | |||||||||||
Total
Revenues
|
$ |
2,364,728
|
$ |
2,038,320
|
$ |
326,408
|
16.01 | % |
Revenues
for our HIV tests during the three months ended March 31, 2008 increased by
approximately $110,000 over the same period in 2007. This was
primarily attributable to increased sales in Africa, due to increased testing in
this region, and sales to our distributor in the United States, partially offset
by no sales to Mexico in 2008. Sales to Mexico in the first quarter
of 2007 were approximately $1,090,000. Sales of our Tuberculosis
products increased by $68,000 in the three month period ended March 31, 2008
over the same period in 2007. The increase in grant and development
income was due to revenue generated from grant and feasibility studies for our
patented DPP™ technology. Sales to Africa (see Note 2(e) of the
financial statements) were primarily from Nigeria of approximately
$850,000. During the first quarter we were informed that our
designation in Nigeria as one of the screening tests has changed to that of the
confirmatory test as this country moves from a parallel to a serial testing
algorithm (a testing algorithm is a protocol defining how selected tests are
used. In a parallel algorithm two tests are used simultaneously,
while in a serial algorithm a screen test is performed first and if positive a
second confirmatory test is run) by the end of 2008. Consequently,
after shipment of outstanding orders, we expect our sales to Nigeria to decrease
in 2008. Sales to Inverness of our HIV products were approximately
$541,000.
Gross
Margin:
Gross Margin related
to
|
For the three months
ended
|
|||||||||||||||
Net Product
Sales:
|
March 31,
2008
|
March 31,
2007
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
||||||||||||
Gross Margin per Statement of
Operations
|
$ |
1,061,922
|
$ |
659,819
|
$ |
402,103
|
60.94 | % | ||||||||
Less: Research grant
income
|
126,757
|
12,998
|
113,759
|
875.20 | % | |||||||||||
Gross Margin from Net Product
Sales
|
$ |
935,165
|
$ |
646,821
|
$ |
288,344
|
44.58 | % | ||||||||
Gross Margin
%
|
41.79 | % | 31.94 | % |
The
increase in our gross margin resulted primarily from increased average unit
selling prices on product sold to Inverness, our U.S. distributor. In
addition a reserve for potential costs related to a voluntary recall of a
component lowered the gross margin in the 2008 period by approximately $40,000
or 1.7% of net sales.
2
Research and
Development:
This
category includes costs incurred for regulatory approvals, product evaluations
and registrations.
Selected expense
lines:
|
For the three months
ended
|
|||||||||||||||
March 31,
2008
|
March 31,
2007
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||||
Clinical &
Regulatory Affairs:
|
||||||||||||||||
Wages and related
costs
|
$ |
66,836
|
$ |
46,922
|
$ |
19,914
|
42.44 | % | ||||||||
Consulting
|
6,435
|
11,273
|
(4,838 | ) | -42.92 | % | ||||||||||
Clinical
Trials
|
74,180
|
1,500
|
72,680
|
4845.33 | % | |||||||||||
Other
|
21,241
|
1,397
|
19,844
|
1420.47 | % | |||||||||||
Total
Regulatory
|
$ |
168,692
|
$ |
61,092
|
$ |
107,600
|
176.13 | % | ||||||||
R&D Other than
Regulatory:
|
||||||||||||||||
Wages and related
costs
|
$ |
276,180
|
$ |
194,966
|
81,214
|
41.66 | % | |||||||||
Consulting
|
5,000
|
10,084
|
(5,084 | ) | -50.42 | % | ||||||||||
Share-based
compensation
|
53,224
|
708
|
52,516
|
7417.51 | % | |||||||||||
Materials and
supplies
|
90,644
|
24,767
|
65,877
|
265.99 | % | |||||||||||
Other
|
32,596
|
27,113
|
5,483
|
20.22 | % | |||||||||||
Total other than
Regulatory
|
$ |
457,644
|
$ |
257,638
|
$ |
200,006
|
77.63 | % | ||||||||
Total Research and
Development
|
$ |
626,336
|
$ |
318,730
|
$ |
307,606
|
96.51 | % |
Expenses
for Clinical & Regulatory Affairs for the three months ended March 31, 2008
increased by $107,600 as compared to the same period in 2007. This was primarily
due to consulting and clinical trail expenses related to an amendment of our PMA
claims to include the 12 -17 year old age group as well as oral fluid studies
performed with our FDA-approved (for blood matrices) HIV 1/2 STAT-PAK™ and our
prototype DPP™ HIV product.
Expenses
other than Clinical & Regulatory Affairs increased by approximately $200,000
in the three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared with the same period in
2007. These increases were primarily related to an increase in the
work related to feasibility studies for our DPP™ platform and to work related to
grant income received, both resulting in an increase in our personnel and
material costs. In addition the $52,500 cost of share-based
compensation related to the value of common stock and employee stock options
issued to employees also contributed to the increase.
Subject
to cash availability, the Company currently plans to continue to increase its
spending on research and development in 2008 because it believes such spending
will result in the deployment of new and innovative products that are based on
the newly patented DPP™ technology.
The
Company has several Research & Development and Regulatory projects
underway. Some highlights include:
Research & Development - Dual
Path Platform (DPP™)
During
the year to date we have made significant progress in implementing our strategy
for the deployment of our Dual Path Platform (DPP™) technology. DPP™
is our patented point of care (“POC”) platform which, when combined with our
experience in product development and manufacturing, is creating multiple long
term revenue opportunities across many potential POC testing
applications.
On
January 29th 2008 we signed three new technology transfer, supply and license
agreements with the Bio-Manguinhos unit of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation of Brazil
for products we are completing development of on DPP™. Our DPP™
test platform was selected because of the high sensitivity and specificity of
prototypes evaluated by Bio-Manguinhos and because of the unique multiplexing
capabilities of DPP™. Two of the products being developed will be
used in screening programs funded by Brazil’s Ministry of Health for the control
and eradication of Leishmaniasis and Leptospirosis, respectively, which are both
blood-borne infectious diseases that are endemic to Brazil. A third
test being developed is for the confirmation of HIV-1 in patients who have
tested positive with a screening test. Bio-Manguinhos, also known as the
Immunobiological Technology Institute, is the largest producer of vaccines and
kits for diagnosis of infectious and parasitic diseases in Latin
America. Bio-Manguinhos is affiliated with the Brazilian Ministry of
Health. The DPP™ POC screening tests will complement the current Bio-Manguinhos
national program, which currently only uses laboratory-based technologies. The
HIV-1 confirmatory test will allow for the simultaneous binding and uniform
delivery of samples to multiple HIV-1 antigens printed in the detection zone,
providing results equivalent to Western blot in a simple POC format that
provides results within 20 minutes rather than hours. We expect that
commercial sales will begin during the second half of 2008 upon completing
development of each of the tests and regulatory approval in
Brazil.
3
On April
16 we announced a new development agreement with Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., one
of the world’s leading in vitro diagnostic and life science
companies. The agreement with Bio-Rad is for the development of a new
multiplex product that would be developed on DPP™ and which would be marketed
exclusively by Bio-Rad under a limited DPP™ license from
Chembio. We believe that this collaboration will enable us to
capitalize on some of the unique capabilities of DPP.
Our
collaboration with Pall Corporation, initially reported during 2007, is
proceeding well. In December we announced the completion of the feasibility
studies that had been funded by Pall Corporation in connection with an OEM
multiplex product opportunity. During the first quarter the parties
agreed that Chembio would perform additional studies that were funded by Pall
and which we completed satisfactorily in April. We are
currently discussing additional studies that will be necessary to determine
product configuration and design. Thereupon we would finalize a
product development, license and manufacturing agreement with Pall.
We have
also made substantial progress in incorporating other technologies into our DPP™
products such as fluorescence and reader technologies. These
technologies, which are patented or patent-pending, will provide performance
features that we believe will enhance our future product offerings to our
customers. We believe that POC testing will increasingly incorporate
reader and information technologies that can cost-effectively improve the
reproducibility of results, remove subjectivity from the interpretation of
results, allow for the documentation and dissemination of results without
additional steps being required by the clinician, and enable improved
levels of detection. Our recent studies have shown that DPP™ is
particularly useful in the deployment of these
technologies. Specifically, we have seen that the improved membrane
clearance that results from the independent application of the sample to the
test zone on our DPP™ provides markedly reduced background and improved
clearance, which essentially means that readers can more effectively detect and
quantify results. This was most recently evident in our ongoing HIV
studies (see below) where we compared our prototype DPP™ HIV rapid test with
certain FDA PMA approved products.
We have
several other collaborations that we are pursuing for additional OEM products
with which our select customers desire to capitalize on market opportunities
they have identified. Our OEM customers have specialized knowledge
and marketing expertise in their selected markets. There can be no
assurance that any of these projects, including those with Bio-Manguinhos, Pall
and Bio-Rad, will result in completed products or that such products, if
successfully completed, will be successfully
commercialized. Nevertheless, the depth and breadth of new product
opportunities that we have with DPP are the most the Company has ever
had.
We are
also developing DPP™ products under Chembio brands that would address
significant global market opportunities in POC testing that we have
identified. These products include but are not limited to our oral
fluid HIV test and our combination screen and confirm POC syphilis test being
developed pursuant to a Cooperative Research & Development Agreement in
collaboration with the United States Centers for Disease
Control. During the first quarter we conducted studies with
prototypes of each of these products that produced very encouraging results, as
discussed below.
Progress on DPP™ HIV Oral Fluid Test
– We believe that there is an unmet need for an oral fluid HIV
test that can better address market requirements than currently available
products. This test should be capable of testing on all blood
matrices as well (finger stick whole blood, venous whole blood, serum and
plasma). We have developed a prototype of such a test using our DPP™
technology together with other proprietary materials and components. During this
past quarter we made progress in finalizing the design features for this
product. We are completing a pre-clinical study on known HIV positive
patients that we believe will allow us to initiate clinical trials in support of
a FDA PMA approval. We think that this product, if successfully
commercialized, will help to ensure our long term position in the global rapid
HIV test market. During the second quarter we plan to finalize the design of
this product (See RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND CHEMBIO’S PLAN OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
NEXT TWELVE MONTHS).
4
Progress on DPP™ Syphilis Screen and
Confirm Multiplex Test –
Background: According to
recent data presented at the March 2008 National STD Prevention Conference, the
preliminary 2007 syphilis data from CDC show that the national rate of primary
and secondary syphilis (the most infectious stages of the disease), increased
12% between 2006 and 2007. According to the 2005 Market Monitor Report,
approximately 32 million syphilis tests were performed in the U.S.,
approximately 40% of which are done in public health and other non-hospital
clinical settings. Globally, there are about 12 million new Syphilis
cases each year as estimated by the World Health
Organization. Current POC rapid screening tests, none of which are
marketed in the U.S., are unable to distinguish between current and past
infection. The only confirmatory tests used in the United States, such as RPR
and VDRL, cannot use whole blood, thereby limiting their ability to be used in a
POC setting where the use of a finger stick blood would be more
appropriate.
Opportunity: Chembio has
completed development of a prototype of a new syphilis test that would permit
separate detection of both treponemal and non-treponemal antibodies within the
same POC device, that would use a single whole blood sample, and that would
provide results in a hand-held reader within 20 minutes, thereby providing the
clinician with definitive disease state information at the POC. The
immediacy of the confirmed test result while the patient is still at the
location would mean the patient could be provided treatment at the POC, greatly
reducing the number of patients not being treated because they don’t return for
their test results. Patent-pending materials provided by CDC,
combined with Chembio’s patented DPP technology and other proprietary
technologies, are being used to develop this screen and confirm
product.
Recent Results: Our most
recent data show that the DPP Syphilis Combo test can achieve a high level of
performance (sensitivity and specificity) compared to the reference tests.
Additional work is required to optimize the performance of the DPP test. Chembio
believes that development will be completed and the product validated within six
months.
Regulatory
We are
conductng a study that when completed will provide us with the data set required
for submission to the FDA in order to amend the age range that can be tested
with our two FDA-approved rapid HIV tests from 18 years old and above
to 13 years old and above. This will enhance the marketability of
these products in the United States at least. This study and associated
submission will be a supplement to our Pre-Marketing Approval (PMA), which we
plan to submit as soon as practical. Although we anticipate we will
receive approval of this PMA amendment this year, there is no assurance that the
FDA will approve these additional claims based upon our submission.
We
continue to make progress on getting our products CE marked. Last August we
received certification under ISO (International Organization for
Standardization) 13.485: 2003, the quality system that is most recognized
throughout the European Community for medical device products seeking a CE
marking. We then engaged a European Notified Body in connection with our plans
to obtain a CE marking for these products. Materials required for the study were
shipped to the regulatory agency in Europe last month and evaluations of both
products are supposed to be completed during the second quarter. Based upon this
timetable we will submit the Technical File to our Notified Body late 2Q08 –
early 3Q08. The technical file review is anticipated to be completed well before
the end of the third quarter. We would therefore anticipate receiving CE marking
during the fourth quarter.
In April
2008, we initiated a voluntary recall of two lots of Control kits used with our
HIV 1-2 Stat Pak® Assay distributed by Inverness under its Clearview® brand.
Control kits are to be used in order to verify the operator’s ability to
properly perform the test and to interpret the results. These kits are supplied
directly to Inverness by our vendor in accordance with our specifications and
instructions. In the case of these two lots of Control kits, although
they met our specifications, they were at the lower limit of such
specifications, and this produced some issues with the interpretation of the
control kit results by certain customers. Chembio has provided the kit supplier
with a more clearly defined specification and has reviewed copies of revised
manufacturing and testing procedures to ensure implementation of the new
specification. Based upon these new specifications, packaged HIV Rapid Test
Control Packs containing the new HIV Controls were ready for customer
distribution. We have classified this recall as Class III recall “a situation in
which there is little chance that using or being exposed to the device will
cause health problems”.
5
Selling, General and
Administrative Expense:
Selected expense
lines:
|
For the three months
ended
|
|||||||||||||||
March 31,
2008
|
March 31,
2007
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||||
Wages and related
costs
|
$ |
345,785
|
$ |
382,177
|
$ | (36,392 | ) | -9.52 | % | |||||||
Consulting
|
44,316
|
34,199
|
10,117
|
29.58 | % | |||||||||||
Commissons, License and
Royalties
|
256,204
|
207,009
|
49,195
|
23.76 | % | |||||||||||
Share-based
compensation
|
72,151
|
456
|
71,695
|
15722.59 | % | |||||||||||
Marketing
Materials
|
8,902
|
17,510
|
(8,608 | ) | -49.16 | % | ||||||||||
Investor
Relations
|
59,080
|
47,827
|
11,253
|
23.53 | % | |||||||||||
Legal, Accounting and Sox 404
compliance
|
259,424
|
248,140
|
11,284
|
4.55 | % | |||||||||||
Travel, Entertainment and
shows
|
20,367
|
37,329
|
(16,962 | ) | -45.44 | % | ||||||||||
Bad Debt
Allowance
|
6,062
|
10,725
|
(4,663 | ) | -43.48 | % | ||||||||||
Other
|
174,863
|
266,854
|
(91,991 | ) | -34.47 | % | ||||||||||
Total S, G
&A
|
$ |
1,247,154
|
$ |
1,252,226
|
$ | (5,072 | ) | -0.41 | % |
Selling,
general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008
remained level as compared with the same period in 2007. Increases in
commission, license and royalty expenses as well as expenses related to the
issuance of options to employees contributed to this increase. These
increases were offset by reductions in wages and related expenses, travel and
entertainment costs as well as other expenses. Our periodic review of
our allowance for doubtful accounts resulted in an increase of the allowance in
the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Other Income and
Expense:
Other Income and
Expense
|
For the three months
ended
|
|||||||||||||||
March 31,
2008
|
March 31,
2007
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||||
Other income
(expense)
|
$ |
-
|
$ |
133,008
|
$ | (133,008 | ) | -100.00 | % | |||||||
Interest
income
|
18,979
|
52,321
|
(33,342 | ) | -63.73 | % | ||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(5,593 | ) | (2,997 | ) | (2,596 | ) | 86.62 | % | ||||||||
Total Other Income and
Expense
|
$ |
13,386
|
$ |
182,332
|
$ | (168,946 | ) | -92.66 | % |
The
Company received $133,000 in 2007, net of expenses, from New York State related
to a program for qualified emerging technology companies, resulting in the
decrease in other income. Interest income for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 decreased due to a decrease in funds available to
invest. The addition of capital leases at the end of 2007 resulted in
the increase in interest expense in 2008 over 2007.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES
For the three months
ended
|
||||||||||||||||
March 31,
2008
|
March 31,
2007
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||||
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
$ | (874,097 | ) | $ | (410,037 | ) | $ | (464,060 | ) | 113.18 | % | |||||
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
(179,272 | ) | (22,415 | ) | (156,857 | ) | 699.79 | % | ||||||||
Net cash utilized by financing
activities
|
(9,265 | ) | (9,269 | ) |
4
|
-0.04 | % | |||||||||
NET (DECREASE) IN
CASH
|
$ | (1,062,634 | ) | $ | (441,721 | ) | $ | (620,913 | ) | 140.57 | % |
The
Company had a decrease in cash for the three months ended March 31, 2008 that
exceeded the amount of the decrease in cash for the same period in 2007. The
excess of the decrease during the 2008 period is primarily attributable to
greater amounts of cash used in operations and for the purchase of fixed
assets.
6
The
Company had a working capital surplus of approximately $2,122,000 at March 31,
2008 and a working capital surplus of approximately $3,229,000 at December 31,
2007. The Company believes its resources are sufficient to fund its
needs through the end of 2008 and into early 2009, although its liquidity and
cash requirements will depend on several factors. These factors include (1) the
level of revenue growth; (2) the extent, if any, to which that revenue growth
improves operating cash flows; (3) the Company’s expenditures for research and
development, facilities, marketing, regulatory approvals, and other expenditures
it may determine to make; (4) the Company’s investment in capital equipment and
the extent to which this investment improves cash flow through operating
efficiencies and (5) the Company’s ability to obtain development and license
fees from OEM partners.
The
following table lists the future payments required on the Company’s debt and
certain other contractual obligations as of March 31, 2008:
OBLIGATIONS
|
Total
|
Less
than
|
1-3
Years
|
4-5
Years
|
Greater
than
|
|||||||||||||||
1 Year
|
5 Years
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Capital Leases
(1)
|
$ |
124,093
|
$ |
30,316
|
$ |
85,716
|
$ |
8,061
|
$ |
-
|
||||||||||
Operating
Leases
|
138,840
|
128,160
|
10,680
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Other Long Term
Obligations(2)
|
1,533,333
|
732,500
|
740,833
|
30,000
|
30,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
Obligations
|
$ |
1,796,266
|
$ |
890,976
|
$ |
837,229
|
$ |
38,061
|
$ |
30,000
|
|
(1)
|
This
represents capital leases used to purchase capital equipment. (Obligations
inclusive of interest).
|
|
(2)
|
This
represents contractual obligations for fixed cost licenses and employment
contracts.
|
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND CHEMBIO’S
PLAN OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NEXT TWELVE MONTHS
Chembio’s
business is now divided into two distinct business components: The first
component is our base of growing revenues derived from the rapid tests that we
developed using lateral flow technologies; this primarily consists of our rapid
HIV tests, but also includes our currently marketed rapid tests for veterinary
and human tuberculosis, and for Chagas Disease. Almost all of our
product revenue growth has been from our rapid HIV tests, although in the first
quarter we also had revenue growth from our niche line of veterinary
tuberculosis tests. Our improving gross margins are primarily
attributable to the incremental sales resulting from the introduction one year
ago in the United States market of our FDA-approved rapid HIV
tests. We believe that the demand for rapid HIV tests will increase
in the United States as well as globally, and we believe we are well positioned
as one of the only FDA PMA approved US-based manufacturers of tests, to
participate in this growth. Market conditions for rapid HIV tests
being used in developing countries with high rates of HIV prevalence, have
become increasingly competitive. Programs such as the United States President’s
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the Global Fund vest decisions for
product selection with the host governments, and this often results in
selections of products that are produced under different standards and/or that
have different costs of manufacturing, regulatory compliance, and/or
intellectual property. A significant portion of our sales since 2005
have come from these programs which is a risk we are endeavoring to mitigate
through our other business development activities. Additional markets for our
HIV tests will become available as we receive our CE mark, and this also may
help to mitigate this risk. In any case we are pursuing strategies to
outsource at least some of our manufacturing in order to more effectively
participate in these markets. If we can continue to grow our
revenues, we should also continue to realize economies of scale in our current
facility as we did in 2007 and the year to date, thereby further improving our
gross margins. We continue implementing a series of process and
efficiency projects that have also improved margins.
The
second business component now is our DPP™ business, a business which we
established last year after we received our patent covering this technology.
Within this second component we have an OEM business strategy and an emerging
Chembio branded product line that is being developed. We have made significant
progress in implementing our strategy for the deployment of our Dual Path
Platform technology, both OEM and branded, and we believe this business will
drive long term growth at Chembio.
Under the
new agreements we signed with Bio-Manguinhos (see Research & Development),
once the three products under these agreements are approved for sale in Brazil,
which we anticipate well before year end 2008, Chembio will receive
approximately $500,000 in royalty payments, and will also begin to receive
purchase orders during the succeeding 12-month period of at least approximately
$2 million based upon the aggregate minimum purchase amounts under these
agreements. We expect these initial DPP™ product revenues to occur this
year. Thereafter, following this 12 month period the agreement allows
for production of the products to be transferred to Brazil, subject to certain
royalty payments. These agreements are similar to Chembio’s 2004 agreement with
the same entity (Bio-Manguinhos) for one of our rapid HIV tests.
7
On April
16, 2008 we announced a new funded development agreement with Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Inc., one of the world’s leading in-vitro diagnostic and life
science companies. The agreement with Bio-Rad is for the development
of a new multiplex product that would be developed at Chembio on DPP and which
would be marketed exclusively by Bio-Rad. Once we reach certain
milestones under this agreement, we anticipate being able to provide additional
information concerning this collaboration with Bio-Rad. We are
currently discussing with Pall Corporation additional studies that are necessary
to determine product configuration and design. Upon successful
completion of those studies, we would finalize a product development,
license and manufacturing agreement with Pall. We have several other OEM product
opportunities under discussion. There can be no assurance that any of
these projects will result in completed products or that such products, if
successfully completed, will be successfully commercialized.
As
discussed above (see Research & Development) we have made significant
progress in the development of two Chembio branded products (DPP HIV Oral Fluid
and DPP Syphilis Screen & Confirm), and we have identified other products
for which we believe there is a significant market opportunity and unmet
need. We anticipate that the pre-clinical studies
for our DPP™ HIV test will be completed shortly and that we will be able to move
forward on clinical studies in support of an FDA Pre-Marketing Approval
application during the balance of the year, and to determine the best means of
bringing this product to the US and global market. We believe that
there are several attractive alternatives available. We also believe
there will be significant interest for the marketing of our combination Syphilis
Screen and Confirm test. We are focused on commercializing this
product and identifying potential marketing strategies for it, both in the US
and globally. We believe that both of these products may be able to
contribute meaningful revenues to Chembio in 2009. Sales of our USDA
approved products for veterinary tuberculosis have grown and if this growth
continues it will provide a source of meaningful cash flow.
We
believe that we can achieve profitable operating results based upon a sales
level of approximately $3-$4 million per quarter, depending on product mix,
efficiencies and other factors, including the extent to which we invest in
product development. Until we are able to consistently attain such
level of sales and profitability, our strategy is to realize development income
and license income in connection with our DPP business strategy in order to fund
operating losses. Notwithstanding some of the risks and uncertainties
mentioned above our current order backlog is at a record level and the depth and
breadth of opportunities we have as a result of our DPP™ technology has never
been greater. At the end of the first quarter we took certain steps
to lower certain overhead costs, which together with our product development
efforts, we anticipate will improve cash flow, subject to and partially offset
by the anticipated increased research and development expenditures, in part to
support funded development contracts, but also in order to maximize our ability
to complete products and conclude more agreements related to our DPP™
technology, such as our agreements with Bio Rad, Bio-Manguinhos, Pall
Corporation and our syphilis and HIV DPP™ product. If necessary, with
these future revenue opportunities in place, we believe our ability to raise
additional capital from strategic or other investors, if necessary, will be
improved. There can be no assurance of our attaining such sales
levels, profitability, development and license income, or capital, or of
completing such products or agreements.
8
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
and Procedures
(a) Management's
Quarterly Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. The
Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate
system of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f)). Under the supervision and with the participation of
our senior management, consisting of our chief executive officer and our chief
financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
as of the end of the period covered by this report (the "Evaluation
Date"). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including
our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that as of
the Evaluation Date our disclosure controls and procedures are effective such
that the information relating to us required to be disclosed in our Securities
and Exchange Commission ("SEC") reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii)
is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Our
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States. Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be
effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives. In evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting, our management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework. This quarterly
report does not include an attestation report of our registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our
registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's
report in this quarterly report.
(b) Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes
in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last
fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially
affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over
financial reporting.
9
PART II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
6. EXHIBITS.
Number
|
Description
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation, as amended. (3)
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws. (1)
|
4.1
|
Second
Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of the Relative Rights and
Preferences of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Registrant.
(11)
|
4.2
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated as of May 5, 2004, by and among the Registrant and
the Purchasers listed therein. (2)
|
4.3
|
Lock-Up
Agreement, dated as of May 5, 2004, by and among the Registrant and the
shareholders of the Registrant listed therein. (2)
|
4.4
|
Amended
Form of Common Stock Warrant issued pursuant to the May 4, 2004 Stock and
Warrant Purchase Agreement. (11)
|
4.5
|
Form
of $0.90 Warrant issued to Mark L. Baum pursuant to the Consulting
Agreement dated as of May 5, 2004 between the Registrant and Mark L. Baum.
(2)
|
4.6
|
Form
of $0.60 Warrant issued to Mark L. Baum pursuant to the Consulting
Agreement dated as of May 5, 2004 between the Registrant and Mark L. Baum.
(2)
|
4.7
|
Second
Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights,
and Limitations of Series B 9% Convertible Preferred Stock of the
Registrant. (11)
|
4.8
|
Form
of Common Stock Warrant issued pursuant to the January 26, 2005 Securities
Purchase Agreement. (9)
|
4.9
|
Amended
Form of Common Stock Warrant issued pursuant to the January 26, 2005
Securities Purchase Agreement. (11)
|
4.10
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2005, by and among the
Registrant and the purchasers listed therein. (9)
|
4.11
|
Form
of Warrant, dated June 29, 2006, issued pursuant to Company and purchasers
of the Company’s Secured Debentures. (4)
|
4.12
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated June 29, 2006. (4)
|
4.13
|
Second
Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and
Limitations of Series C 7% Convertible Preferred Stock of the Registrant.
(11)
|
4.14
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2006, by and among the
Registrant and the Purchasers listed therein. (6)
|
4.15
|
Form
of Common Stock Warrant issued pursuant to the Securities Purchase
Agreements dated September 29, 2006 (6).
|
4.16
|
Amended
Form of Common Stock Warrant issued pursuant to the Securities Purchase
Agreements dated October 5, 2006. (11)
|
4.17
|
Amended
Form of Common Stock Warrant issued to Placement Agents pursuant to the
October 5, 2005 Securities Purchase Agreement. (11)
|
4.18
|
Form
of Employee Option Agreement. (11)
|
4.19
|
Amended
Form of Warrant used for Consultant Services, and in connection with the
Company’s 2004 merger. (11)
|
4.20
|
1999
Equity Incentive Plan (13)
|
10.1
|
Employment
Agreement dated June 15, 2006 with Lawrence A. Siebert.
(5)
|
10.2
|
Employment
Agreement dated April 23, 2007 with Javan Esfandiari.
(12)
|
10.3
|
Series
A Convertible Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Stock
and Warrant Purchase Agreement”), dated as of May 5, 2004, by and among
the Registrant and the purchasers listed therein. (2)
|
10.4
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”), dated as of
January 26, 2005, by and among the Registrant and the purchasers listed
therein. (9)
|
10.5
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 28, 2005 by
and among the Registrant and the purchasers listed therein.
(10)
|
10.6
|
Equity
Exchange Agreement, dated as of January 28, 2005, by and between the
Registrant and Kurzman Partners, LP. (10)
|
10.7
|
Security
Purchase Agreement, dated June 29, 2006, among the Company and purchasers
of the Company’s Secured Debentures. (4)
|
10.8
|
Form
of Secured Debenture, dated June 29, 2006. (4)
|
10.9
|
Security
Agreement, dated June 29, 2006, among the Company, Chembio Diagnostic
Systems, Inc., and purchasers of the Company’s Secured Debentures.
(4)
|
10.10
|
Subsidiary
Guarantee, dated June 29, 2006, made by Chembio Diagnostic Systems, Inc.,
in favor of Purchasers of the Company’s Secured Debentures.
(4)
|
10.11
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”), dated as of
September 29, 2006, by and among the Registrant and the Purchasers listed
therein. (6)
|
10.12
|
Letter
of Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreements dated as of September 29,
2006 by and among the Registrant and the Purchasers listed therein.
(6)
|
10.13
|
HIV
Barrel License, Marketing and Distribution Agreement, dated as of
September 29, 2006, by and among the Registrant, Inverness and StatSure.
(6)
|
10.14
|
HIV
Cassette License, Marketing and Distribution Agreement, dated as of
September 29, 2006, between the Registrant and Inverness.
(6)
|
10.15
|
Non-Exclusive
License, Marketing and Distribution Agreement, dated as of September 29,
2006, between the Registrant and Inverness. (6)
|
10.16
|
Joint
HIV Barrel Product Commercialization Agreement, dated as of September 29,
2006, between the Registrant and StatSure. (6)
|
10.17
|
Settlement
Agreement, dated September 29, 2006, between the Registrant and StatSure.
(6)
|
10.18
|
Contract
for Transfer of Technology and Materials with Bio-Manguinhos.
(7)
|
10.19
|
License
and Supply Agreement dated as of August 30, 2002 by and between Chembio
Diagnostic Systems Inc. and Adaltis Inc. (8)
|
31.1
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
10
(1)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form SB-2 filed
with the Commission on August 23, 1999 and the Registrant's Forms 8-K
filed on May 14, 2004, December 20, 2007 and April 18,
2008.
|
(2)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on May 14, 2004.
|
(3)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-KSB filed with
the Commission on March 31, 2005.
|
(4)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on July 3, 2006.
|
(5)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on June 21, 2006.
|
(6)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on October 5, 2006.
|
(7)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form SB-2/A
filed with the Commission on August 4,
2004.
|
(8)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form SB-2 filed
with the Commission on June 7,
2004.
|
(9)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on January 31, 2005.
|
(10)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form SB-2 filed
with the Commission on March 28,
2005.
|
(11)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-KSB filed with
the Commission on March 12, 2008.
|
(12)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with
the Commission on May 3, 2007.
|
(13)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule
14A filed with the Commission on May 11,
2005.
|
11
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Chembio
Diagnostics, Inc.
Date:
|
May
12, 2008
|
By:
/s/ Lawrence A. Siebert
|
|
|
Lawrence
A. Siebert
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
May
12, 2008
|
By:
/s / Richard J. Larkin
|
|
|
Richard
J. Larkin
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
12