CHEMED CORP - Quarter Report: 2019 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
☒ Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2019
☐ Transition Report Pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File Number: 1-8351
CHEMED CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
31-0791746
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
|
255 E. Fifth Street, Suite 2600, Cincinnati, Ohio
|
45202
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip code)
|
(513) 762-6690
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
|
☒
|
No
|
☐
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule
405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Yes
|
☒
|
No
|
☐
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large accelerated filer
|
☒
|
Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☐
|
|
Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended the extended transition period for
complying with a new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13 (a) of the Exchange Act ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
|
☐
|
No
|
☒
|
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
|
Trading Symbol |
Name of each exchange on |
Amount
|
Date
|
which registered |
||||
Capital Stock $1 Par Value
|
CHE |
New York Stock Exchange |
15,940,201 Shares
|
March 31, 2019
|
-1-
CHEMED CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Index |
||||
Page No.
|
||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: | ||||
Item 1. Financial Statements | ||||
3
|
||||
4
|
||||
5
|
||||
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity - | ||||
Three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 | 6 |
|||
7
|
||||
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
22
|
|||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
34
|
|||
34
|
||||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | ||||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
34
|
|||
Item 1A. Risk Factors |
34
|
|||
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
35
|
|||
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
35
|
|||
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures |
35
|
|||
Item 5. Other Information |
35
|
|||
Item 6. Exhibits |
36
|
|||
EX – 31.1
|
||||
EX – 31.2
|
||||
EX – 31.3
|
||||
EX – 32.1
|
||||
EX – 32.2
|
||||
EX – 32.3
|
||||
EX – 101.INS
|
||||
EX – 101.SCH
|
||||
EX – 101.CAL
|
||||
EX – 101.DEF
|
||||
EX – 101.LAB
|
||||
EX – 101.PRE
|
-2-
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||||||||
Item 1. Financial Statements
|
||||||||
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
|
||||||||
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
||||||||
March 31, 2019
|
December 31, 2018
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current assets
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
8,768
|
$
|
4,831
|
||||
Accounts receivable
|
119,575
|
119,504
|
||||||
Inventories
|
6,315
|
5,705
|
||||||
Prepaid income taxes
|
5,349
|
10,646
|
||||||
Prepaid expenses
|
19,148
|
19,154
|
||||||
Total current assets
|
159,155
|
159,840
|
||||||
Investments of deferred compensation plans
|
70,632
|
65,624
|
||||||
Properties and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $254,499 (2018 - $248,370)
|
164,629
|
162,033
|
||||||
Lease right of use assets less accumulated amoritzation of $5,450
|
87,811
|
-
|
||||||
Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization of $33,803 (2018 - $33,284)
|
67,868
|
68,253
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
510,598
|
510,570
|
||||||
Other assets
|
9,138
|
9,209
|
||||||
Total Assets
|
$
|
1,069,831
|
$
|
975,529
|
||||
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Current liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$
|
39,737
|
$
|
50,150
|
||||
Income taxes
|
3,922
|
-
|
||||||
Accrued insurance
|
48,477
|
46,095
|
||||||
Accrued compensation
|
52,526
|
63,329
|
||||||
Accrued legal
|
8,163
|
1,857
|
||||||
Short-term lease liability
|
30,699
|
-
|
||||||
Other current liabilities
|
33,576
|
30,239
|
||||||
Total current liabilities
|
217,100
|
191,670
|
||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
18,108
|
21,598
|
||||||
Long-term debt
|
100,000
|
89,200
|
||||||
Deferred compensation liabilities
|
70,934
|
64,616
|
||||||
Long-term lease liability
|
67,960
|
-
|
||||||
Other liabilities
|
7,719
|
17,111
|
||||||
Total Liabilities
|
481,821
|
384,195
|
||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Capital stock - authorized 80,000,000 shares $1 par; issued 35,520,908 shares (2018 - 35,311,418 shares)
|
35,521
|
35,311
|
||||||
Paid-in capital
|
803,701
|
774,358
|
||||||
Retained earnings
|
1,265,485
|
1,225,617
|
||||||
Treasury stock - 19,661,407 shares (2018 - 19,438,358)
|
(1,519,077
|
)
|
(1,446,296
|
)
|
||||
Deferred compensation payable in Company stock
|
2,380
|
2,344
|
||||||
Total Stockholders' Equity
|
588,010
|
591,334
|
||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
$
|
1,069,831
|
$
|
975,529
|
||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
|
-3-
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
|
||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||
Service revenues and sales
|
$
|
462,034
|
$
|
439,176
|
||||
Cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation)
|
321,951
|
304,536
|
||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
74,029
|
69,000
|
||||||
Depreciation
|
9,710
|
9,267
|
||||||
Amortization
|
519
|
27
|
||||||
Other operating expenses/(income)
|
6,353
|
(51
|
)
|
|||||
Total costs and expenses
|
412,562
|
382,779
|
||||||
Income from operations
|
49,472
|
56,397
|
||||||
Interest expense
|
(1,124
|
)
|
(1,207
|
)
|
||||
Other income - net
|
2,439
|
1,018
|
||||||
Income before income taxes
|
50,787
|
56,208
|
||||||
Income taxes
|
(6,120
|
)
|
(11,212
|
)
|
||||
Net income
|
$
|
44,667
|
$
|
44,996
|
||||
Earnings Per Share:
|
||||||||
Net income
|
$
|
2.80
|
$
|
2.79
|
||||
Average number of shares outstanding
|
15,954
|
16,100
|
||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
||||||||
Net income
|
$
|
2.70
|
$
|
2.66
|
||||
Average number of shares outstanding
|
16,525
|
16,887
|
||||||
Cash Dividends Per Share
|
$
|
0.30
|
$
|
0.28
|
||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
|
-4-
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
|
||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
|
||||||||
Net income
|
$
|
44,667
|
$
|
44,996
|
||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
|
||||||||
by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
10,229
|
9,294
|
||||||
Litigation settlement
|
6,000
|
-
|
||||||
Stock option expense
|
4,089
|
3,653
|
||||||
Benefit for deferred income taxes
|
(3,489
|
)
|
(2,807
|
)
|
||||
Noncash long-term incentive compensation
|
1,119
|
1,721
|
||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
76
|
128
|
||||||
Amortization of restricted stock awards
|
-
|
291
|
||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
(Increase)/decrease in accounts receivable
|
(81
|
)
|
1,591
|
|||||
(Increase)/decrease in inventories
|
(610
|
)
|
60
|
|||||
Decrease in prepaid expenses
|
6
|
1,045
|
||||||
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable and other current liabilities
|
348
|
(7,911
|
)
|
|||||
Change in current income taxes
|
9,219
|
13,642
|
||||||
Increase in other assets
|
(5,006
|
)
|
(4,263
|
)
|
||||
Increase in other liabilities
|
6,459
|
3,758
|
||||||
Other sources/(uses)
|
559
|
(5
|
)
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
73,585
|
65,193
|
||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
|
||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
(13,866
|
)
|
(12,648
|
)
|
||||
Business combinations
|
-
|
(1,450
|
)
|
|||||
Other (uses)/sources
|
(68
|
)
|
181
|
|||||
Net cash used by investing activities
|
(13,934
|
)
|
(13,917
|
)
|
||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
|
||||||||
Proceeds from revolving line of credit
|
125,100
|
134,300
|
||||||
Payments on revolving line of credit
|
(114,300
|
)
|
(90,500
|
)
|
||||
Purchases of treasury stock
|
(49,250
|
)
|
(81,125
|
)
|
||||
Change in cash overdrafts payable
|
(13,303
|
)
|
(6,671
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
11,827
|
8,923
|
||||||
Capital stock surrendered to pay taxes on stock-based compensation
|
(11,170
|
)
|
(6,377
|
)
|
||||
Dividends paid
|
(4,799
|
)
|
(4,533
|
)
|
||||
Payments on other long-term debt
|
-
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|||||
Other sources/(uses)
|
181
|
(228
|
)
|
|||||
Net cash used by financing activities
|
(55,714
|
)
|
(48,711
|
)
|
||||
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
3,937
|
2,565
|
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
4,831
|
11,121
|
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
8,768
|
$
|
13,686
|
||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
|
-5-
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
|
Payable in
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Stock-
|
Company
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
at Cost
|
Stock
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
35,311
|
774,358
|
1,225,617
|
(1,446,296
|
)
|
2,344
|
591,334
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
-
|
-
|
44,667
|
-
|
-
|
44,667
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid ($0.30 per share)
|
-
|
-
|
(4,799
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(4,799
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Stock awards and exercise of stock options
|
210
|
29,152
|
-
|
(23,495
|
)
|
-
|
5,867
|
|||||||||||||||||
Purchases of treasury stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(49,250
|
)
|
-
|
(49,250
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
|
-
|
191
|
-
|
(36
|
)
|
36
|
191
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2019
|
$
|
35,521
|
$
|
803,701
|
$
|
1,265,485
|
$
|
(1,519,077
|
)
|
$
|
2,380
|
$
|
588,010
|
|||||||||||
Deferred
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
|
Payable in
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Stock-
|
Company
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
at Cost
|
Stock
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
34,732
|
695,797
|
1,038,955
|
(1,231,332
|
)
|
2,202
|
540,354
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
-
|
-
|
44,996
|
-
|
-
|
44,996
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid ($0.28 per share)
|
-
|
-
|
(4,533
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(4,533
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Stock awards and exercise of stock options
|
153
|
17,410
|
-
|
(9,352
|
)
|
-
|
8,211
|
|||||||||||||||||
Purchases of treasury stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(81,125
|
)
|
-
|
(81,125
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
|
-
|
(216
|
)
|
(728
|
)
|
(34
|
)
|
34
|
(944
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2018
|
$
|
34,885
|
$
|
712,991
|
$
|
1,078,690
|
$
|
(1,321,843
|
)
|
$
|
2,236
|
$
|
506,959
|
|||||||||||
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of these statements.
|
-6-
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
1. Basis of Presentation
As used herein, the terms "We," "Company" and "Chemed" refer to Chemed Corporation or Chemed
Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Chemed in accordance
with Rule 10-01 of SEC Regulation S-X. Consequently, we have omitted certain disclosures required under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The December 31, 2018 balance sheet
data were derived from audited financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP. However, in our opinion, the financial statements presented herein contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary to state fairly our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. These financial statements are prepared on the same basis as and should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related
notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.
LEASE ACCOUNTING
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2016-02 Leases” which
introduced a lessee model that brings most leases on to the balance sheets and updates lessor accounting to align with changes in the lessee model and the revenue recognition standard. This standard is also referred to as Accountings Standards
Codification No.842 (“ASC 842”). We adopted ASC 842 effective January 1, 2019, using the optional transition method requiring leases existing at, or entered into after, January 1, 2019 to be recognized and measured. The transition method
selected does not require adjustments to prior period amounts, which continue to be reflected in accordance with historical accounting. In addition, we elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within
the new standard which among other things, allowed us to carry forward the historical lease classification.
Chemed and each of its operating subsidiaries are service companies. As such, real estate leases
comprise the largest lease obligation (and conversely, right of use asset) in our lease portfolio. VITAS has leased office space, as well as space for inpatient units (“IPUs”) and/or contract beds within hospitals. Roto-Rooter mainly has leased
office space.
Roto-Rooter purchases equipment and leases it to certain of its independent contractors. We analyzed
these leases in accordance with ASC 842 and determined they are operating leases. As a result, Roto-Rooter will continue to capitalize the equipment underlying these leases, depreciate the equipment and recognize rental income.
Adoption of the new standard resulted in right of use assets and lease liabilities of $87.8 million
and $98.7 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2019. In determining the liability, we used our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the time of adoption, since the rate implicit in the leases cannot be readily
determined. At January 1, 2019, the weighted average rate was 3.47%. The standard did not materially impact our consolidated net income or cash flows. We did not book a cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of the standard.
CLOUD COMPUTING
On January 1, 2019, we early adopted ASU No. 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs
Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract”. This ASU aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing
implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal use software. We adopted the ASU on a prospective basis.
As of March 31, 2019, we have two cloud computing arrangements that are service contracts.
Roto-Rooter is implementing a system to assist in technician dispatch and VITAS is implementing a new human resources system. We have capitalized approximately $2.6 million related to implementation of this project which is included in prepaid
assets in the accompanying balance sheets. There has been no amortization expense associated with the asset as the software has not yet been placed in service. We anticipate amortizing the assets over the original term of the arrangements plus
renewal options that are reasonably certain of being exercised.
NON-EMPLOYEE STOCK COMPENSATION
In June 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2018-07 – Compensation – Stock
Compensation”. The ASU expands the scope of current guidance to include all share-based payment arrangements related to the acquisition of goods and services from both non-employees and employees. The guidance in the ASU is effective for the
Company in all fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Adoption of this standard had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
-7-
CASH FLOW CLASSIFICATION
In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2016-15 – Cash Flow
Classification” which amends guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The primary purpose of ASU 2016-15 was to reduce diversity in practice related to eight specific cash flow issues.
The guidance in this ASU was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. We adopted this ASU as of January 1, 2018. There was no material effect to our statements of cash flow.
INCOME TAXES
Our effective income tax rate was 12.1% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to 19.9% during the
first quarter of 2018. Excess tax benefit on stock options reduced our income tax expenses by $6.7 million and $3.8 million, respectively for the quarters ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS
Included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets are $2.1 million and $3.2 million of
capitalized property and equipment which were not paid for as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. These amounts have been excluded from capital expenditures in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow. There are
no material non-cash amounts included in interest expense for any period presented.
2. Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts
with Customers.” The standard and subsequent amendments are theoretically intended to develop a common revenue standard for removing inconsistencies and weaknesses, improve comparability, provide for more useful information to users through
improved disclosure requirements and simplify the preparation of financial statements. The standard is also referred to as Accounting Standards Codification No. 606 (“ASC 606”). We adopted ASC 606 effective January 1, 2018. The required
disclosures of ASC 606 and impact of adoption are discussed below for each of our operating subsidiaries.
VITAS
Service revenue for VITAS is reported at the amount that reflects the ultimate consideration we
expect to receive in exchange for providing patient care. These amounts are due from third-party payors, primarily commercial health insurers and government programs (Medicare and Medicaid), and includes variable consideration for revenue
adjustments due to settlements of audits and reviews, as well as certain hospice-specific revenue capitations. Amounts are generally billed monthly or subsequent to patient discharge. Subsequent changes in the transaction price initially
recognized are not significant.
Hospice services are provided on a daily basis and the type of service provided is determined based
on a physician’s determination of each patient’s specific needs on that given day. Reimbursement rates for hospice services are on a per diem
basis regardless of the type of service provided or the payor. Reimbursement rates from government programs are established by the appropriate governmental agency and are standard across all hospice providers. Reimbursement rates from health
insurers are negotiated with each payor and generally structured to closely mirror the Medicare reimbursement model. The types of hospice services provided and associated reimbursement model for each are as follows:
Routine Home Care
occurs when a patient receives hospice care in their home, including a nursing home setting. The routine home care rate is paid for each day that a patient is in a hospice program and is not receiving one of the other categories of hospice
care. For Medicare patients, the routine home care rate reflects a two-tiered rate, with a higher rate for the first 60 days of a hospice patient’s care and a lower rate for days 61 and after. In addition, there is a Service Intensity Add-on
payment which covers direct home care visits conducted by a registered nurse or social worker in the last seven days of a hospice patient’s life, reimbursed up to four hours per day in fifteen minute increments at the continuous home care rate.
General Inpatient Care
occurs when a patient requires services in a controlled setting for a short period of time for pain control or symptom management which cannot be managed in other settings. General inpatient care services must be provided in a Medicare or
Medicaid certified hospital or long-term care facility or at a freestanding inpatient hospice facility with the required registered nurse staffing.
Continuous Home Care
is provided to patients while at home, including a nursing home setting, during periods of crisis when intensive monitoring and care, primarily nursing care, is required in order to achieve palliation or management of acute medical symptoms.
Continuous home care requires a minimum of 8 hours of care within a 24-hour day, which begins at midnight. The care must be predominantly nursing care provided by either a registered nurse or licensed nurse practitioner. While the published
Medicare continuous home care rates are daily rates, Medicare pays for continuous home care in fifteen minute increments. This fifteen minute rate is calculated by dividing the daily rate by 96.
-8-
Respite Care
permits a hospice patient to receive services on an inpatient basis for a short period of time in order to provide relief for the patient’s family or other caregivers from the demands of caring for the patient. A hospice can receive payment for
respite care for a given patient for up to five consecutive days at a time, after which respite care is reimbursed at the routine home care rate.
Each level of care represents a separate promise under the contract of care and is provided
independently for each patient contingent upon the patient’s specific medical needs as determined by a physician. However, the clinical criteria used to determine a patient’s level of care is consistent across all patients, given that, each
patient is subject to the same payor rules and regulations. As a result, we have concluded that each level of care is capable of being distinct and is distinct in the context of the contract. Furthermore, we have determined that each level of
care represents a stand ready service provided as a series of either days or hours of patient care. We believe that the performance obligations for each level of care meet criteria to be satisfied over time. VITAS recognizes revenue based on
the service output. VITAS believes this to be the most faithful depiction of the transfer of control of services as the patient simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by our performance. Revenue is recognized on a daily or
hourly basis for each patient in accordance with the reimbursement model for each type of service. VITAS’ performance obligations relate to contracts with an expected duration of less than one year. Therefore, VITAS has elected to apply the
optional exception provided in ASC 606 and is not required to disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied at the end of the reporting period. The
unsatisfied or partially satisfied performance obligations referred to above relate to bereavement services provided to patients’ families for at least 12 months after discharge.
Care is provided to patients regardless of their ability to pay. Patients who meet our criteria for
charity care are provided care without charge. There is no revenue or associated accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated financial statements related to charity care. The cost of providing charity care during the quarters ended
March 31, 2019 and 2018 was $2.1 million, in each quarter. The cost of charity care is included in cost of services provided and goods sold and is calculated by taking the ratio of charity care days to total days of care and multiplying by the
total cost of care.
Generally, patients who are covered by third-party payors are responsible for related deductibles and
coinsurance which vary in amount. VITAS also provides service to patients without a reimbursement source and may offer those patients discounts from standard charges. VITAS estimates the transaction price for patients with deductibles and
coinsurance, along with those uninsured patients, based on historical experience and current conditions. The estimate of any contractual adjustments, discounts or implicit price concessions reduces the amount of revenue initially recognized.
Subsequent changes to the estimate of the transaction price are recorded as adjustments to patient service revenue in the period of change. Subsequent changes that are determined to be the result of an adverse change in the patients’ ability to
pay (i.e. change in credit risk) are recorded as bad debt expense. VITAS has no material adjustments related to subsequent changes in the estimate of the transaction price or subsequent changes as the result of an adverse change in the patient’s
ability to pay for any period reported.
Laws and regulations concerning government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, are complex and
subject to varying interpretation. Compliance with such laws and regulations may be subject to future government review and interpretation. Additionally, the contracts we have with commercial health insurance payors provide for retroactive
audit and review of claims. Settlement with third party payors for retroactive adjustments due to audits, reviews or investigations are considered variable consideration and are included in the determination of the estimated transaction price
for providing patient care. The variable consideration is estimated based on the terms of the payment agreement, existing correspondence from the payor and our historical settlement activity. These estimates are adjusted in future periods, as
new information becomes available.
We are subject to certain limitations on Medicare payments for services which are considered variable
consideration, as follows:
Inpatient Cap. If
the number of inpatient care days any hospice program provides to Medicare beneficiaries exceeds 20% of the total days of hospice care such program provided to all Medicare patients for an annual period beginning September 28, the days in excess
of the 20% figure may be reimbursed only at the routine homecare rate. None of VITAS’ hospice programs exceeded the payment limits on inpatient services during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.
-9-
Medicare Cap. We
are also subject to a Medicare annual per-beneficiary cap (“Medicare cap”). Compliance with the Medicare cap is measured in one of two ways based on a provider election. The “streamlined” method compares total Medicare payments received under a
Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by that Medicare provider number with the product of the per-beneficiary cap amount and the number of
Medicare beneficiaries electing hospice care for the first time from that hospice program or programs from September 28 through September 27 of the following year. At March 31, 2019, all our programs except one are using the “streamlined”
method.
The “proportional” method compares the total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number with respect to
services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by the Medicare provider number between September 28 and September 27 of the following year with the product of the per beneficiary cap amount and a
pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries receiving hospice services from that program during the same period. The pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries is calculated based on the ratio of days the beneficiary received hospice services
during the measurement period to the total number of days the beneficiary received hospice services.
We actively monitor each of our hospice programs, by provider number, as to their specific admission, discharge rate and
median length of stay data in an attempt to determine whether revenues are likely to exceed the annual per-beneficiary Medicare cap. Should we determine that revenues for a program are likely to exceed the Medicare cap based on projected trends,
we attempt to institute corrective actions, which include changes to the patient mix and increased patient admissions. However, should we project our corrective action will not prevent that program from exceeding its Medicare cap, we estimate
revenue recognized during the government fiscal year that will require repayment to the Federal government under the Medicare cap and record an adjustment to revenue of an amount equal to a ratable portion of our best estimate for the year.
In 2013, the U.S.
government implemented automatic budget reductions of 2.0% for all government payees, including hospice benefits paid under the Medicare program. In 2015, CMS determined that the Medicare cap should be calculated “as if” sequestration did not
occur. As a result of this decision, VITAS has received notification from our third-party intermediary that an additional $4.1 million is owed for Medicare cap
in three programs arising during the 2013 through 2017 measurement periods. The amounts are automatically deducted from our semi-monthly PIP payments. We do not believe that CMS is authorized under the sequestration authority or the statutory
methodology for establishing the Medicare cap to the amounts they have withheld and intend to withhold under their current “as if” methodology. We have appealed CMS’s methodology change.
During the quarter
ended March 31, 2019, we recorded $3.4 million in net Medicare cap revenue reduction related to three programs for the 2019 government fiscal year. During the
quarter ended March 31, 2018, we reversed $1.8 million of the $2.4 million Medicare cap revenue reduction recognized in the fourth quarter of 2017 due to improved metrics in VITAS programs.
For VITAS’ patients in the nursing home setting in which Medicaid pays the nursing home room and
board, VITAS serves as a pass-through between Medicaid and the nursing home. We are responsible for paying the nursing home for that patient’s room and board. Medicaid reimburses us for 95% of the amount we have paid. This results in a 5% net
expense for VITAS related to nursing home room and board. This transaction creates a performance obligation in that VITAS is facilitating room and board being delivered to our patient. As a result, the 5% net expense is recognized as a
contra-revenue account under ASC 606 in the accompanying financial statements.
-10-
The composition of patient care service revenue by payor and level of care for the quarter ended
March 31, 2019 is as follows (in thousands):
Medicare
|
Medicaid
|
Commercial
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Routine home care
|
$
|
241,700
|
$
|
11,673
|
$
|
5,474
|
$
|
258,847
|
||||||||
Continuous care
|
28,973
|
1,787
|
1,484
|
32,244
|
||||||||||||
Inpatient care
|
18,989
|
2,148
|
1,433
|
22,570
|
||||||||||||
$
|
289,662
|
$
|
15,608
|
$
|
8,391
|
$
|
313,661
|
|||||||||
All other revenue - self-pay, respite care, etc.
|
2,010
|
|||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
$
|
315,671
|
||||||||||||||
Medicare cap adjustment
|
(3,400
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Implicit price concessions
|
(2,948
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Room and board, net
|
(2,542
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net revenue
|
$
|
306,781
|
The composition of patient care service revenue by payor and level of care for the quarter ended
March 31, 2018 is as follows (in thousands):
Medicare
|
Medicaid
|
Commercial
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Routine home care
|
$
|
224,021
|
$
|
11,280
|
$
|
5,730
|
$
|
241,031
|
||||||||
Continuous care
|
27,632
|
1,603
|
1,531
|
30,766
|
||||||||||||
Inpatient care
|
18,857
|
2,048
|
1,203
|
22,108
|
||||||||||||
$
|
270,510
|
$
|
14,931
|
$
|
8,464
|
$
|
293,905
|
|||||||||
All other revenue - self-pay, respite care, etc.
|
1,741
|
|||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
$
|
295,646
|
||||||||||||||
Medicare cap adjustment
|
1,818
|
|||||||||||||||
Implicit price concessions
|
(2,833
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Room and board, net
|
(2,618
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net revenue
|
$
|
292,013
|
Roto-Rooter
Roto-Rooter provides plumbing, drain cleaning, water restoration and other related services to
both residential and commercial customers primarily in the United States. Services are provided through a network of company-owned branches, independent contractors and franchisees. Service revenue for Roto-Rooter is reported at the amount that
reflects the ultimate consideration we expect to receive in exchange for providing services.
Roto-Rooter owns and operates branches focusing mainly on large population centers in the United
States. Roto-Rooter’s primary lines of business in company-owned branches consist of plumbing, sewer and drain cleaning, excavation and water restoration. For purposes of ASC 606 analysis, plumbing, sewer and drain cleaning, and excavation have
been combined into one portfolio and are referred to as “short-term core services”. Water restoration is analyzed as a separate portfolio. The following describes the key characteristics of these portfolios:
Short-term Core
Services are plumbing, drain and sewer cleaning and excavation services. These services are provided to both commercial and residential customers. The duration of services provided in this category range from a few hours to a few
days. There are no significant warranty costs or on-going obligations to the customer once a service has been completed. For residential customers, payment is received at the time of job completion before the Roto-Rooter technician leaves the
residence. Commercial customers may be granted credit subject to internally designated authority limits and credit check guidelines. If credit is granted, payment terms are 30 days or less.
Each job in this category is a distinct service with a distinct performance obligation to the customer. Revenue is
recognized at the completion of each job. Variable consideration consists of pre-invoice discounts and post-invoice discounts. Pre-invoice discounts are given in the form of coupons or price concessions. Post-invoice discounts consist of credit
memos generally granted to resolve customer service issues. Variable consideration is estimated based on historical activity and recorded at the time service is completed.
-11-
Water Restoration
Services involve the remediation of water and humidity after a flood. These services are provided to both commercial and residential customers. The duration of services provided in this category generally ranges from 3 to 5 days.
There are no significant warranties or on-going obligations to the customer once service has been completed. The majority of these services are paid by the customer’s insurance company. Variable consideration relates primarily to allowances
taken by insurance companies upon payment. Variable consideration is estimated based on historical activity and recorded at the time service is completed.
For both short-term core services and water restoration services, Roto-Rooter satisfies its
performance obligation at a point in time. The services provided generally involve fixing plumbing, drainage or flood-related issues at the customer’s property. At the time service is complete, the customer acknowledges its obligation to pay
for service and its satisfaction with the service performed. This provides evidence that the customer has accepted the service and Roto-Rooter is now entitled to payment. As such, Roto-Rooter recognizes revenue for these services upon
completion of the job and receipt of customer acknowledgement. Roto-Rooter’s performance obligations for short-term core services and water restoration services relate to contracts with an expected duration of less than a year. Therefore,
Roto-Rooter has elected to apply the optional exception provided in ASC 606 and is not required to disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied at the
end of the reporting period. Roto-Rooter does not have significant unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied performance obligations at the time of initial revenue recognition for short-term core or water restoration services.
Roto-Rooter owns the rights to certain territories and contracts with independent third-parties
to operate the territory under Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks. The contract is for a specified term but cancellable by either party without penalty with 90 days’ advance notice. Under the terms of these arrangements, Roto-Rooter provides
certain back office support and advertising along with a limited license to use Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks. The independent contractor is responsible for all day-to-day management of the business including staffing decisions and pricing
of services provided. All performance obligations of Roto-Rooter cease at the termination of the arrangement.
Independent contractors pay Roto-Rooter a standard fee calculated as a percentage of their weekly
labor sales. The primary value for the independent contractors under these arrangements is the right to use Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks. Roto-Rooter recognizes revenue from independent contractors over-time (weekly) as the independent
contractor’s labor sales are completed. Payment from independent contractors is also received on a weekly basis. The use of Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks and advertising provides immediate value to the independent contractor as a result
of Roto-Rooter’s nationally recognized brand. Therefore, over-time recognition provides the most faithful depiction of the transfer of services as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided. There is no significant
variable consideration related to these arrangements.
Roto-Rooter has licensed the rights to operate under Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks in other
territories to franchisees. The contract is for a 10 year term but cancellable by Roto-Rooter for cause with 60 day advance notice without penalty. The franchisee may cancel the contract for any reason with 60 days advance notice without
penalty. Under the terms of the contract, Roto-Rooter provides national advertising and consultation on various aspects of operating a Roto-Rooter business along with the right to use Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks. The franchisee is
responsible for all day- to-day management of the business including staffing decisions, pricing of services provided and local advertising spend and placement. All performance obligations of Roto-Rooter cease at the termination of the
arrangement.
Franchisees pay Roto-Rooter a standard monthly fee based on the population within the franchise
territory. The standard fee is revised on a yearly basis based on changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers. The primary value for the franchisees under this arrangement is the right to use Roto-Rooter’s registered
trademarks. Roto-Rooter recognizes revenue from franchisees over-time (monthly). Payment from franchisees is also received on a monthly basis. The use of Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks and advertising provides immediate value to the
franchisees as a result of Roto-Rooter’s nationally recognized brand. Therefore, over-time recognition provides the most faithful depiction of the transfer of services as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided.
There is no significant variable consideration related to these arrangements.
-12-
The composition of disaggregated revenue is as follows (in thousands):
March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||
Short-term core service jobs
|
$
|
111,059
|
$
|
104,086
|
||||
Water restoration
|
27,652
|
27,737
|
||||||
Contractor revenue
|
14,009
|
12,365
|
||||||
Franchise fees
|
1,621
|
1,592
|
||||||
All other
|
3,008
|
3,320
|
||||||
Subtotal
|
$
|
157,349
|
$
|
149,100
|
||||
Implicit price concessions and credit memos
|
(2,096
|
)
|
(1,937
|
)
|
||||
Net revenue
|
$
|
155,253
|
$
|
147,163
|
Initial Adoption of ASC 606
The Company utilized the modified retrospective method of adoption for all contracts. The Company
has consistently applied the accounting policies to all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. Sales tax collected from customers at Roto-Rooter is excluded from revenue under ASC 606 and prior revenue standards.
3. Segments
Service revenues and sales by business segment are shown in Footnote 2. After-tax earnings by business
segment are as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
2018 |
|||||||
After-tax Income/(Loss)
|
||||||||
VITAS
|
$
|
29,288
|
$
|
32,015
|
||||
Roto-Rooter
|
22,986
|
22,938
|
||||||
Total
|
52,274
|
54,953
|
||||||
Corporate
|
(7,607
|
)
|
(9,957
|
)
|
||||
Net income
|
$
|
44,667
|
$
|
44,996
|
We report corporate administrative expenses and unallocated investing and financing income and
expense not directly related to either segment as “Corporate”.
4. Earnings per Share
Earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed using the weighted average number of shares of capital stock
outstanding. Earnings and diluted earnings per share are computed as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Net Income
|
||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
Income
|
Shares
|
Earnings per
Share
|
|||||||||
2019
|
||||||||||||
Earnings
|
$
|
44,667
|
15,954
|
$
|
2.80
|
|||||||
Dilutive stock options
|
-
|
494
|
||||||||||
Nonvested stock awards
|
-
|
77
|
||||||||||
Diluted earnings
|
$
|
44,667
|
16,525
|
$
|
2.70
|
|||||||
2018
|
||||||||||||
Earnings
|
$
|
44,996
|
16,100
|
$
|
2.79
|
|||||||
Dilutive stock options
|
-
|
680
|
||||||||||
Nonvested stock awards
|
-
|
107
|
||||||||||
Diluted earnings
|
$
|
44,996
|
16,887
|
$
|
2.66
|
-13-
For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, there were 246,000 and 328,000,
respectively, stock options were excluded in the computation of dilutive earnings per share because they would have been anti-dilutive.
5. Long-Term Debt and Lines of Credit
On June 20, 2018, we replaced our existing credit agreement with the Fourth Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement (“2018 Credit Agreement”). Terms of the 2018 Credit Agreement consist of a five-year, $450 million revolving credit facility and a $150 million
expansion feature, which may consist of term loans or additional revolving commitments. The interest rate at the inception of the agreement is LIBOR plus 100 basis points. The 2018 Credit Agreement has a floating interest rate that is
generally LIBOR plus a tiered additional rate which varies based on our current leverage ratio. The amount outstanding as of March 31, 2019 is $100.0 million.
Debt issuance costs associated with the prior credit agreement were not written off as the lenders
and their relative percentages participation in the facility did not change. With respect to the 2018 Credit Agreement, deferred financing costs were $1.0 million.
The 2018 Credit Agreement contains the following quarterly financial covenants:
Description
|
Requirement
|
|
Leverage Ratio (Consolidated Indebtedness/Consolidated Adj. EBITDA)
|
< 3.50 to 1.00
|
|
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (Consolidated Free Cash Flow/Consolidated Fixed Charges)
|
> 1.50 to 1.00
|
We are in compliance with all debt covenants as of March 31, 2019. We have issued $36.3 million in standby letters of
credit as of March 31, 2019. mainly for insurance purposes. Issued letters of credit reduce our available credit under the 2018 Credit Agreement. As of March 31, 2019, we have approximately $313.7 million of unused lines of credit available and
eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility.
6. Other Operating Expenses/(Income)
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
|
2018 |
||||||
Litigation settlement
|
$
|
6,000
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Loss/(income) on disposal of fixed assets
|
353
|
(51
|
)
|
|||||
Total other operating expenses/(income)
|
$
|
6,353
|
$
|
(51
|
)
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company recorded $6.0 million for a potential legal settlement, which
includes the settlement amount, estimated employment taxes and other litigation costs. See footnote 11 for further discussion.
7. Other Income – Net
Other income -- net comprises the following (in thousands):
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
|
2018 |
||||||
Market value adjustment on assets held in
|
||||||||
deferred compensation trust
|
$
|
2,338
|
$
|
860
|
||||
Interest income
|
101
|
158
|
||||||
Total other income - net
|
$
|
2,439
|
$
|
1,018
|
-14-
8. Leases
Chemed and each of its operating subsidiaries are service companies. As such, real estate leases comprise the largest
lease obligation (and conversely, right of use asset) in our lease portfolio. VITAS has leased office space, as well as space for IPUs and/or contract beds within hospitals. Roto-Rooter has leased office space. Our leases have remaining terms
of under 1 year to 10 years, some of which include options to extend the lease for up to 5 years, and some of which include options to terminate the lease within 1 year.
We made a policy election to exclude leases with a lease term less than 12 months from being recorded on the balance
sheet. We adopted the practical expedient related to the combining of lease and non-lease components, which allows us to account for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease component.
Adoption of the new standard resulted in right of use assets and lease liabilities of approximately $87.8 million and
$98.7 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2019. In determining the liability, we used our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the time of adoption, since the rate implicit in the leases cannot be readily
determined. At January 1, 2019, the weighted average rate was 3.47%. The standard did not materially impact our consolidated net income or cash flows. We did not book a cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of the standard.
We do not currently have any finance leases, all lease information disclosed is related to operating leases.
The components of balance sheet information related to leases were as follows:
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||
2019
|
||||
Assets
|
||||
Operating lease assets
|
$
|
87,811
|
||
Liabilities
|
||||
Current operating leases
|
30,699
|
|||
Noncurrent operating leases
|
67,960
|
|||
Total operating lease liabilities
|
$
|
98,659
|
The components of lease expense were as follows:
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||
2019
|
||||
Lease Expense (a)
|
||||
Operating lease expense
|
$
|
11,537
|
||
Sublease income
|
(6
|
)
|
||
Net lease expense
|
$
|
11,531
|
(a)
|
Includes short-term leases and variable lease costs,
which are immaterial. Included in both cost of services provided and goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses.
|
The components of cash flow information related to leases were as follows:
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||
2019
|
||||
Cash paid for amounts included in
the measurement of lease liabilities
|
||||
Operating cash flows from leases
|
$
|
9,987
|
||
Leased assets obtained in exchange
for new operating lease liabilities
|
$
|
3,213
|
-15-
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term
|
||
Operating leases
|
4.21
|
years
|
Weighted Average Discount Rate
|
||
Operating leases
|
3.47
|
%
|
Maturity of Operating Lease Liabilities (in thousands)
|
||||
2019
|
$
|
33,836
|
||
2020
|
26,044
|
|||
2021
|
18,914
|
|||
2022
|
12,479
|
|||
2023
|
7,262
|
|||
Thereafter
|
11,039
|
|||
Total lease payments
|
$
|
109,574
|
||
Less: interest
|
(7,915
|
)
|
||
Less: future lease obligations not yet commenced
|
(3,000
|
)
|
||
Total liability recognized on the balance sheet
|
$
|
98,659
|
The following is a summary of future minimum rental payments to be received under operating leases that have initial noncancelable terms in
excess of one year at December 31, 2018:
Maturity of Operating Lease Liabilities (in thousands)
|
||||
2019
|
$
|
26,791
|
||
2020
|
24,152
|
|||
2021
|
19,669
|
|||
2022
|
13,851
|
|||
2023
|
8,179
|
|||
Thereafter
|
10,974
|
|||
Total lease payments
|
$
|
103,616
|
For leases commencing prior to 2019, minimum rental payments exclude payments to landlords for real estate taxes and
common area maintenance. Operating lease payments include $2.3 million related to extended lease terms that are reasonably certain of being exercised and exclude $3.0 million lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced.
9. Stock-Based Compensation Plans
On February 22, 2019, the Compensation/Incentive Committee of the Board of Directors (“CIC”) granted
6,864 Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”) contingent upon the achievement of certain total shareholder return (“TSR”) targets as compared to the TSR of a group of peer companies for the three-year period ending December 31, 2021, the date at which
such awards vest. The cumulative compensation cost of the TSR-based PSU award to be recorded over the three year service period is $3.0 million.
On February 22, 2019, the CIC also granted 6,864 PSUs contingent upon the achievement of certain
earnings per share (“EPS”) targets for the three-year period ending December 31, 2021. At the end of each reporting period, the Company estimates the number of shares that it believes will ultimately be earned and records the corresponding
expense over the service period of the award. We currently estimate the cumulative compensation cost of the EPS-based PSUs to be recorded over the three year service period is $2.2 million.
-16-
10. Retirement Plans
All of the Company’s plans that provide retirement and similar benefits are defined contribution
plans. These expenses include the impact of market gains and losses on assets held in deferred compensation plans and are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. Expenses for the Company’s retirement and profit-sharing plans,
excess benefit plans and other similar plans are as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended March 31,
|
|||||||
2019
|
|
2018 |
|||||
$
|
6,914
|
$
|
5,166
|
11. Legal and Regulatory Matters
The VITAS segment of the Company’s business operates in a heavily-regulated industry. As a result,
the Company is subjected to inquiries and investigations by various government agencies, as well as to lawsuits, including qui tam actions.
The following sections describe the various ongoing material lawsuits and investigations of which the Company is currently aware. It is not possible at this time for us to estimate either the timing or outcome of any of those matters, or whether
any potential loss, or range of potential losses, is probable or reasonably estimable.
Regulatory Matters and Litigation
The Company and certain current and former directors and officers were named as defendants in a case
captioned In re Chemed Corp. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (CJB) (D. Del.), which was consolidated on February 2,
2015.
As stated in prior disclosures, Lead Plaintiff Michael Kvint filed a Corrected Amended Complaint in
this matter on May 30, 2017. The Kvint Complaint asserted a single claim for breach of the fiduciary duties of good faith, loyalty, due care and candor and sought, on behalf of the Company: (a) compensatory, restitutionary and exemplary damages
in an unspecified amount, together with interest thereon; (b) attorneys’ fees and expenses; and (c) implementation of unspecified policies and procedures meant to prevent future instances of alleged wrongdoing. On September 13, 2017, the Court
entered an order dismissing with prejudice the claims against defendants Timothy S. O’Toole and Joel F. Gemunder and setting a schedule for the remaining Defendants to file a motion to dismiss the Corrected Amended Complaint. The remaining
Defendants subsequently did so. On February 26, 2019, Magistrate Judge Burke issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted with prejudice, and that the matter be dismissed as to all Defendants. On
March 14, 2019, the Court adopted the Report, granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss with prejudice, and dismissed this matter as to all Defendants. The deadline for Plaintiff to file a timely notice of appeal was April 15, 2019. No such notice
was filed. Consequently, this matter is now concluded. As the Company has previously disclosed, the legal fees and costs associated with defending against this lawsuit are presently being paid by insurance. For additional procedural history of
this litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings
On October 30, 2017, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) to
resolve civil litigation under the False Claims Act brought by the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) on behalf of the OIG and various relators concerning VITAS, filed in the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Missouri (the
“2013 Action”). The Company denied any violation of law and agreed to settlement without admission of wrongdoing.
In connection with the settlement VITAS and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a corporate
integrity agreement (“CIA”) on October 30, 2017. The CIA formalizes various aspects of VITAS’ already existing Compliance Program and contains requirements designed to document compliance with federal healthcare program requirements. It has a
term of five years during which it imposes monitoring, reporting, certification, oversight, screening and training obligations, certain of which had previously been implemented by VITAS. It also requires VITAS to engage an Independent Review
Organization to perform audit and review functions and to prepare reports regarding compliance with federal healthcare programs. In the event of breach of the CIA, VITAS could become liable for payment of stipulated penalties or could be
excluded from participation in federal healthcare programs.
Under the Settlement Agreement, the United States agreed to release the Company, VITAS, and its
hospice operation subsidiaries from any civil or administrative monetary liability relating to any patients’ disputed terminal medical prognosis of six months or less; a lack of medical necessity for billed Continuous Home Care, General Inpatient
Care, or Respite Care levels of hospice care; or that the claims for those levels of hospice care were not eligible for payment for any other reason. The OIG agreed, conditioned on the Company’s full payment and in consideration of VITAS’
obligations under the CIA, to release its permissive exclusion rights and refrain from instituting any administrative action seeking to exclude the Company, VITAS, and its affiliates from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal
healthcare programs in this regard.
-17-
Under the Settlement Agreement, the Company paid $75 million plus interest, plus certain attorney
fees and expenses of qui tam relators. The Company made these payments during the fourth quarter of 2017. The Company previously recorded a $90 million loss reserve ($55.8 million after-tax) related to the Settlement Agreement, and associated
costs in the second quarter of 2017. During the fourth quarter of 2017, approximately $5.5 million ($3.4 million after-tax) recorded as part of the $90 million was reversed as relator attorney' fees were less than originally estimated
Jordan Seper (“Seper”), a Registered Nurse at VITAS’ Inland Empire program from May 12, 2014 to March
21, 2015, filed a lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court on September 26, 2016. She alleged VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA (“VITAS CA”) (1) failed to provide minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failed to provide overtime for all hours worked;
(3) failed to provide a second meal period; (4) failed to provide rest breaks; (5) failed to indemnify for necessary expenditures; (6) failed to timely pay wages due at time of separation; and (7) engaged in unfair business practices. Seper
seeks a state-wide class action of current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITAS in California within the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit. She seeks court determination that this action may be maintained as a class
action for the entire California class and subclasses, designation as class representative, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, damages (including wages for regular or overtime hours allegedly worked but not paid, premium payments for missed
meal or rest periods, and unreimbursed expenses), all applicable penalties associated with each claim, pre and post-judgment interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Seper served VITAS CA with the lawsuit, Jordan A. Seper on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA, a business
entity unknown; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number BC 642857 on October 13, 2016 (“Jordan Seper case”).
On November 14, 2016, the Parties filed a Stipulation to transfer the venue of the lawsuit from San
Francisco to Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Superior Court Complex Division accepted transfer of the case on December 6, 2016 and stayed the case. On December 16, 2016, VITAS CA filed its Answer and served written discovery on Seper.
Jiwann Chhina (“Chhina”), hired by VITAS as a Home Health Aide on February 5, 2002, is currently a
Licensed Vocational Nurse for VITAS’ San Diego program. On September 27, 2016, Chhina filed a lawsuit in San Diego Superior Court, alleging (1) failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failure to provide overtime for all hours
worked; (3) failure to pay wages for all hours at the regular rate; (4) failure to provide meal periods; (5) failure to provide rest breaks; (6) failure to provide complete and accurate wage statements; (7) failure to pay for all reimbursement
expenses; (8) unfair business practices; and (9) violation of the California Private Attorneys General Act. Chhina seeks to pursue these claims in the form of a state-wide class action of current and former non-exempt employees employed with
VITAS in California within the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit. He seeks court determination that this action may be maintained as a class action for the entire California class and subclasses, designation as class representative,
declaratory relief, injunctive relief, damages (including wages for regular or overtime hours allegedly worked but not paid, premium payments for missed meal or rest period, and unreimbursed expenses), all applicable penalties associated with
each claim, pre-judgment interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Chhina served VITAS CA with the lawsuit, Jiwan Chhina v. VITAS Health Services of
California, Inc., a California corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation dba VITAS Healthcare Inc.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive;
San Diego Superior Court Case Number 37-2015-00033978-CU-OE-CTL on November 3, 2016 (“Jiwann Chhina case”). On December 1, 2016, VITAS CA filed its Answer and served written discovery on Chhina.
On May 19, 2017, Chere Phillips (a Home Health Aide in Sacramento) and Lady Moore (a former Social
Worker in Sacramento) filed a lawsuit against VITAS CA in Sacramento County Superior Court, alleging claims for (1) failure to pay all wages due; (2) failure to authorize and permit rest periods; (3) failure to provide off-duty meal periods; (4)
failure to furnish accurate wage statements; (5) unreimbursed business expenses; (6) waiting time penalties; (7) violations of unfair competition law; and (8) violation of the Private Attorneys General Act. The case is captioned: Chere Phillips and Lady Moore v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2017-0021-2755.
Plaintiffs sought to pursue these claims in the form of a state-wide class action of current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITAS CA in California within the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit. Plaintiffs served VITAS
with the lawsuit on June 5, 2017. VITAS CA timely answered the Complaint generally denying the Plaintiffs’ allegations. The Court has stayed all class discovery in this case pending resolution of mediation in the Jordan Seper and Jiwann Chhina
cases.
-18-
There are currently three other lawsuits against VITAS pending in the superior courts of other
California counties that contain claims and class periods that substantially overlap with Phillips’ and Moore’s claims: the Jordan Seper and Jiwann Chhina cases, and Williams v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, filed on May 22, 2017 in Alameda County Superior Court, RG 17853886.
Jazzina Williams’ (a Home Health Aide in Sacramento) lawsuit alleges claims for (1) failure to pay
all wages due; (2) failure to authorize and permit rest periods; (3) failure to provide off-duty meal periods; (4) failure to furnish accurate wage statements; (5) unreimbursed business expenses; (6) waiting time penalties; and (7) violations of
the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). Williams seeks to pursue these claims both individually and as a representative action under the PAGA on behalf of current and former California non-exempt employees. Plaintiff served VITAS with the
lawsuit on May 31, 2017. VITAS CA timely answered the Complaint generally denying Plaintiff’s allegations. Williams is pursing discovery of her individual claim and has agreed to a stay of class discovery pending possible resolution through
ongoing mediation in the Jordan Seper and Jiwann Chhina cases. Defendant filed and served each of Plaintiffs Williams, Phillips, and Moore with a Notice of Related Cases on July 19, 2017.
The Seper
and Chhina cases were consolidated in Los Angeles County Superior Court; Chhina was dismissed as a separate action and joined with Seper in the filing of amended
complaint on August 28, 2018, in which both Chhina and Seper were identified as named plaintiffs. The parties engaged in a mediation process beginning in October 2018 and concluded with an agreement in March 2019. The agreement is in the process of incorporation into a
long-form agreement to be presented to the court for preliminary approval, notice to class members, and eventual final approval and payment. The settlement amount, subject to court approval is $5.75 million plus employment taxes. The definition
of the class to participate in the settlement is intended to cover claims raised in the consolidated Seper/Chhina matter, claims raised in Phillips and Moore, as well as any class claims in Williams.
Alfred Lax (“Lax”), a current employee of Roto-Rooter Services Company (“RRSC”), was hired in the
RRSC’s Menlo Park branch in 2007. On November 30, 2018, Lax filed a class action lawsuit in Santa Clara County Superior Court alleging (1) failure to provide or compensate for required rest breaks; (2) failure to properly pay for all hours
worked; (3) failure to provide accurate wage statements; (4) failure to reimburse for work-related expenses; and (5) unfair business practices. Lax has stated these claims as a representative of a class defined as all service technicians
employed by RRSC in California during the four years preceding the filing of the complaint. He seeks a determination that the action may proceed and be maintained as a class action and for compensatory and statutory damages (premium payments for
missed rest periods, uncompensated rest periods, wages for time allegedly not paid such as travel time, repair time, and vehicle maintenance time, and unreimbursed expenses), penalties and restitutions, pre- and post-judgement interest and
attorneys’ fees and costs. The lawsuit, Alfred Lax, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Roto-Rooter Services Company, and
Does 1 through 50 inclusive; Santa Clara County Superior Court Case Number 18CV338652, was received by RRSC on December 11, 2018 and RRSC timely filed its answer denying the claims.
The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss for any of
these lawsuits at this time, with the exception of Seper/Chhina, Phillips and Moore and the class claims in Williams
The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in each of the above lawsuits.
Regardless of the outcome of any of the preceding matters, dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, diversion of management time, and related publicity.
Although the Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.
12. Concentration of Risk
During the quarter VITAS had pharmacy services agreements with one service provider to provide
specified pharmacy services for VITAS and its hospice patients. VITAS made purchases from this provider of $7.3 and $8.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Purchases from this provider represent more than
85% of all pharmacy services used by VITAS during each period presented.
-19-
13. Cash Overdrafts and Cash Equivalents
There are $473,000 in cash overdrafts payable included in accounts payable at March 31, 2019
(December 31, 2018 - $13.8 million).
From time to time throughout the year, we invest excess cash in money market funds with major
commercial banks. We closely monitor the creditworthiness of the institutions with which we invest our overnight funds. The amount invested was not material for each balance sheet date presented.
14. Financial Instruments
FASB’s authoritative guidance on fair value measurements defines a hierarchy which prioritizes the
inputs in fair value measurements. Level 1 measurements are measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 measurements use significant other observable inputs. Level 3 measurements are
measurements using significant unobservable inputs which require a company to develop its own assumptions. In recording the fair value of assets and liabilities, companies must use the most reliable measurement available.
The following shows the carrying value, fair value and the hierarchy for our financial instruments as
of March 31, 2019 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measure
|
||||||||||||||||
Carrying Value
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|||||||||||||
Mutual fund investments of deferred
|
||||||||||||||||
compensation plans held in trust
|
$
|
70,632
|
$
|
70,632
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||
Total debt
|
100,000
|
-
|
100,000
|
-
|
The following shows the carrying value, fair value and the hierarchy for our financial instruments as
of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measure
|
||||||||||||||||
Carrying Value
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|||||||||||||
Mutual fund investments of deferred
|
||||||||||||||||
compensation plans held in trust
|
$
|
65,624
|
$
|
65,624
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||
Total debt
|
89,200
|
-
|
89,200
|
-
|
For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, the carrying amount is a
reasonable estimate of fair value because of the liquidity and short-term nature of these instruments. As further described in Footnote 5, our outstanding long-term debt and current portion of long-term debt have floating interest rates that are
reset at short-term intervals, generally 30 or 60 days. The interest rate we pay also includes an additional amount based on our current leverage ratio. As such, we believe our borrowings reflect significant nonperformance risks, mainly credit
risk. Based on these factors, we believe the fair value of our long-term debt and current portion of long-term debt approximate the carrying value.
-20-
15. Capital Stock Repurchase Plan Transactions
We repurchased the following capital stock for the three ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
|
2018 |
||||||
Total cost of repurchased shares (in thousands)
|
$
|
49,250
|
$
|
81,125
|
||||
Shares repurchased
|
150,000
|
300,000
|
||||||
Weighted average price per share
|
$
|
328.33
|
$
|
270.42
|
In February 2019, the
Board of Directors authorized an additional $150.0 million for stock repurchase under Chemed’s existing share repurchase program. We currently have $147.4 million
of authorization remaining under this share repurchase plan.
16. Recent Accounting Standards
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2017-4 – Intangibles – Goodwill
and Other”. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the FASB eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The guidance in the ASU is effective for the Company in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early
adoption is permitted. We anticipate adoption of this standard will have no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
17. Acquisitions
During the first three months of 2019, we did not complete any business combinations within our
Roto-Rooter or VITAS segment.
During 2018, we completed four business combinations of former franchisees within the Roto-Rooter
segment for $42.2 million in cash to increase our market penetration. The VITAS segment completed one business combination in Florida for $11.0 million to increase our market penetration.
Shown below is movement in Goodwill (in thousands):
VITAS
|
Roto-Rooter
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
$
|
333,331
|
$
|
177,239
|
$
|
510,570
|
||||||
Foreign currency adjustments
|
-
|
28
|
28
|
|||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2019
|
$
|
333,331
|
$
|
177,267
|
$
|
510,598
|
-21-
Executive Summary
We operate through our two wholly-owned subsidiaries, VITAS Healthcare Corporation and Roto-Rooter Group, Inc. VITAS
focuses on hospice care that helps make terminally ill patients’ final days as comfortable as possible. Through its teams of doctors, nurses, home health aides, social workers, clergy and volunteers, VITAS provides direct medical services to
patients, as well as spiritual and emotional counseling to both patients and their families. Roto-Rooter’s services are focused on providing plumbing, drain cleaning, water restoration and other related services to both residential and
commercial customers. Through its network of company-owned branches, independent contractors and franchisees, Roto-Rooter offers plumbing and drain cleaning service to over 90% of the U.S. population.
The following is a summary of the key operating results (in thousands except per share amounts):
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
|
2018 |
||||||
Service revenues and sales
|
$
|
462,034
|
$
|
439,176
|
||||
Net income
|
$
|
44,667
|
$
|
44,996
|
||||
Diluted EPS
|
$
|
2.70
|
$
|
2.66
|
||||
Adjusted net income
|
$
|
48,175
|
$
|
45,851
|
||||
Adjusted diluted EPS
|
$
|
2.92
|
$
|
2.72
|
||||
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
74,798
|
$
|
72,767
|
||||
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of revenue
|
16.2
|
%
|
16.6
|
%
|
Adjusted net income, adjusted diluted EPS, earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”),
Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of revenue are not measures derived in accordance with US GAAP. We provide non-GAAP measures to help readers evaluate our operating results and to compare our operating performance with that of
similar companies that have different capital structures. Our non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable measures presented in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures is
presented on pages 31-32.
For the three months ended March 31, 2019, the increase in consolidated service revenues and sales was driven by a 5.5%
increase at Roto-Rooter and a 5.1% increase at VITAS. The increase in service revenues at Roto-Rooter was driven by an increase in plumbing, drain cleaning, excavation and contractors. Water restoration was flat between quarters. The increase
in service revenues at VITAS is comprised primarily of a 0.6% geographically weighted average Medicare reimbursement rate increase, a 6.6% increase in days of care, offset by $3.4 million in Medicare cap revenue reduction. This growth is
partially offset by a combination of acuity mix shift, fluctuations in net room and board and contractual adjustments that negatively impacted revenue growth 0.4% when compared to the prior-year period. The first quarter of 2018 included a
reversal of prior Medicare cap expense of $1.8 million. See page 33 for additional VITAS operating metrics.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2016-02 Leases” which introduced a lessee model
that brings most leases on to the balance sheets and updates lessor accounting to align with changes in the lessee model and the revenue recognition standard. This standard is also referred to as Accountings Standards Codification No.842 (“ASC
842”). We adopted ASC 842 effective January 1, 2019, using the optional transition method requiring leases existing at, or entered into after, January 1, 2019 to be recognized and measured. The transition method selected does not require
adjustments to prior period amounts, which continue to be reflected in accordance with historical accounting. In addition, we elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard which
among other things, allowed us to carry forward the historical lease classification.
Chemed and each of its operating subsidiaries are service companies. As such, real estate leases comprise the largest
lease obligation (and conversely, right of use asset) in our lease portfolio. VITAS has leased office space, as well as space for inpatient units (“IPUs”) and/or contract beds within hospitals. Roto-Rooter mainly has leased office space.
Roto-Rooter purchases equipment and leases it to certain of its independent contractors. We analyzed these leases in
accordance with ASC 842 and determined they are operating leases. As a result, Roto-Rooter will continue to capitalize the equipment underlying these leases, depreciate the equipment and recognize rental income.
-22-
Adoption of the new standard resulted in right of use assets and lease liabilities of $87.8 million and $98.7 million,
respectively, as of March 31, 2019. In determining the liability, we used our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the time of adoption, since the rate implicit in the leases cannot be readily determined. At January
1, 2019, the weighted average rate was 3.47%. The standard did not materially impact our consolidated net income or cash flows. We did not book a cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of the standard.
VITAS expects its full-year 2019 revenue growth, prior to Medicare cap, to be in the range of 5.5% to 6.0%. Admissions
are estimated to expand approximately 3.0% to 4.0% and Average Daily Census in 2019 is estimated to expand 4.0% to 5.0%. Adjusted EBITDA margin, prior to Medicare cap, is estimated to be 15.9%. We are currently estimating $10.0 million for
Medicare Cap billing limitations for the full-year 2019. Roto-Rooter expects to achieve full-year 2019 revenue growth of 9.0% to 10.0%. The revenue estimate is based upon increased job pricing of approximately 2.0%, continued growth in core
plumbing and drain cleaning services as well as continued but slowing revenue growth in water restoration services. Adjusted EBITDA margin for 2019 is estimated at 23.7%. We anticipate that our operating income and cash flows will be sufficient
to operate our businesses and meet any commitments for the foreseeable future.
Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Material changes in the balance sheet accounts from December 31, 2018 to March 31, 2019 include the following:
•
|
An $87.8 million increase in lease right of use assets due to the adoption of ASC 842.
|
•
|
A $10.4 million decrease in accounts payable due to timing of payments.
|
•
|
A $10.8 decrease in accrued compensation due to the payments of cash bonuses in the first quarter of 2019 accrued in 2018.
|
•
|
A $6.3 million increase in accrued legal primarily due to a $6.0 million litigation settlement at VITAS.
|
•
|
A $30.7 million and $68.0 million increase in short-term and long-term lease liability, respectively, due to the adoption of ASC
842.
|
•
|
A $10.8 million increase in long-term debt due mainly as a result of stock repurchases.
|
•
|
A $72.8 million increase in treasury stock due mainly to stock repurchases.
|
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $8.4 million from March 31, 2018 to March 31, 2019. Significant
changes in our accounts receivable balances are typically driven by the timing of payments received from the Federal government at our VITAS subsidiary. We typically receive a payment in excess of $40.0 million from the Federal government from
hospice services every other Friday. The timing of period end will have a significant impact on the accounts receivable at VITAS. These changes generally normalize over a two year period, as cash flow variations in one year are offset in the
following year.
Management continually evaluates cash utilization alternatives, including share repurchase, debt repurchase,
acquisitions and increased dividends to determine the most beneficial use of available capital resources.
On June 20, 2018, we replaced our existing credit agreement with the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“2018
Credit Agreement”). Terms of the 2018 Credit Agreement consist of a five-year, $450 million revolving credit facility and a $150 million expansion feature, which may
consist of term loans or additional revolving commitments. The revolving credit facility has a five-year maturity with principal payments due at maturity. The interest rate at the inception of the agreement is LIBOR plus 100 basis points. The
2018 Credit Agreement has a floating interest rate that is generally LIBOR plus a tiered additional rate which varies based on our current leverage ratio.
We have issued $36.3 million in standby letters of credit as of March 31, 2019, mainly for insurance purposes. Issued
letters of credit reduce our available credit under the revolving credit agreement. As of March 31, 2019, we have approximately $313.7 million of unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility.
Management believes its liquidity and sources of capital are satisfactory for the Company’s needs in the foreseeable future.
Commitments and Contingencies
Collectively, the terms of our credit agreements require us to meet various financial covenants, to be tested
quarterly. We are in compliance with all financial and other debt covenants as of March 31, 2019 and anticipate remaining in compliance throughout the foreseeable future.
The VITAS segment of the Company’s business operates in a heavily-regulated industry. As a result, the Company is
subjected to inquiries and investigations by various government agencies, as well as to lawsuits, including qui tam actions. The following
sections describe the various ongoing material lawsuits and investigations of which the Company is currently aware. Other than as described below, it is not possible at this time for us to estimate either the timing or outcome of any of those
matters, or whether any potential loss, or range of potential losses, is probable or reasonably estimable.
-23-
The Company and certain current and former directors and officers were named as defendants in a case captioned In re Chemed Corp. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (CJB) (D. Del.), which was consolidated on February 2, 2015.
As stated in prior disclosures, Lead Plaintiff Michael Kvint filed a Corrected Amended Complaint in this matter on May
30, 2017. The Kvint Complaint asserted a single claim for breach of the fiduciary duties of good faith, loyalty, due care and candor and sought, on behalf of the Company: (a) compensatory, restitutionary and exemplary damages in an unspecified
amount, together with interest thereon; (b) attorneys’ fees and expenses; and (c) implementation of unspecified policies and procedures meant to prevent future instances of alleged wrongdoing. On September 13, 2017, the Court entered an order
dismissing with prejudice the claims against defendants Timothy S. O’Toole and Joel F. Gemunder and setting a schedule for the remaining Defendants to file a motion to dismiss the Corrected Amended Complaint. The remaining Defendants
subsequently did so. On February 26, 2019, Magistrate Judge Burke issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted with prejudice, and that the matter be dismissed as to all Defendants. On March 14,
2019, the Court adopted the Report, granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss with prejudice, and dismissed this matter as to all Defendants. The deadline for Plaintiff to file a timely notice of appeal was April 15, 2019. No such notice was
filed. Consequently, this matter is now concluded. As the Company has previously disclosed, the legal fees and costs associated with defending against this lawsuit are presently being paid by insurance. For additional procedural history of
this litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings
On October 30, 2017, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) to resolve civil
litigation under the False Claims Act brought by the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) on behalf of the OIG and various relators concerning VITAS, filed in the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Missouri (the “2013
Action”). The Company denied any violation of law and agreed to settlement without admission of wrongdoing.
In connection with the settlement VITAS and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a corporate integrity agreement
(“CIA”) on October 30, 2017. The CIA formalizes various aspects of VITAS’ already existing Compliance Program and contains requirements designed to document compliance with federal healthcare program requirements. It has a term of five years
during which it imposes monitoring, reporting, certification, oversight, screening and training obligations, certain of which had previously been implemented by VITAS. It also requires VITAS to engage an Independent Review Organization to
perform audit and review functions and to prepare reports regarding compliance with federal healthcare programs. In the event of breach of the CIA, VITAS could become liable for payment of stipulated penalties or could be excluded from
participation in federal healthcare programs.
Under the Settlement Agreement, the United States agreed to release the Company, VITAS, and its hospice operation
subsidiaries from any civil or administrative monetary liability relating to any patients’ disputed terminal medical prognosis of six months or less; a lack of medical necessity for billed Continuous Home Care, General Inpatient Care, or Respite
Care levels of hospice care; or that the claims for those levels of hospice care were not eligible for payment for any other reason. The OIG agreed, conditioned on the Company’s full payment and in consideration of VITAS’ obligations under the
CIA, to release its permissive exclusion rights and refrain from instituting any administrative action seeking to exclude the Company, VITAS, and its affiliates from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal healthcare programs in
this regard.
Under the Settlement Agreement, the Company paid $75 million plus interest, plus certain attorney fees and expenses of
qui tam relators. The Company made these payments during the fourth quarter of 2017. The Company previously recorded a $90 million loss reserve ($55.8 million after-tax) related to the Settlement Agreement, and associated costs in the second
quarter of 2017. During the fourth quarter of 2017, approximately $5.5 million ($3.4 million after-tax) recorded as part of the $90 million was reversed as relator attorney' fees were less than originally estimated
Jordan Seper (“Seper”), a Registered Nurse at VITAS’ Inland Empire program from May 12, 2014 to March 21, 2015, filed a
lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court on September 26, 2016. She alleged VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA (“VITAS CA”) (1) failed to provide minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failed to provide overtime for all hours worked; (3) failed to
provide a second meal period; (4) failed to provide rest breaks; (5) failed to indemnify for necessary expenditures; (6) failed to timely pay wages due at time of separation; and (7) engaged in unfair business practices. Seper seeks a state-wide
class action of current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITAS in California within the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit. She seeks court determination that this action may be maintained as a class action for the
entire California class and subclasses, designation as class representative, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, damages (including wages for regular or overtime hours allegedly worked but not paid, premium payments for missed meal or rest
periods, and unreimbursed expenses), all applicable penalties associated with each claim, pre and post-judgment interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Seper served VITAS CA with the lawsuit, Jordan A. Seper on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA, a business entity unknown; and
DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number BC 642857 on October 13, 2016 (“Jordan Seper case”).
-24-
On November 14, 2016, the Parties filed a Stipulation to transfer the venue of the lawsuit from San Francisco to Los
Angeles. The Los Angeles Superior Court Complex Division accepted transfer of the case on December 6, 2016 and stayed the case. On December 16, 2016, VITAS CA filed its Answer and served written discovery on Seper.
Jiwann Chhina (“Chhina”), hired by VITAS as a Home Health Aide on February 5, 2002, is currently a Licensed Vocational
Nurse for VITAS’ San Diego program. On September 27, 2016, Chhina filed a lawsuit in San Diego Superior Court, alleging (1) failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failure to provide overtime for all hours worked; (3) failure to
pay wages for all hours at the regular rate; (4) failure to provide meal periods; (5) failure to provide rest breaks; (6) failure to provide complete and accurate wage statements; (7) failure to pay for all reimbursement expenses; (8) unfair
business practices; and (9) violation of the California Private Attorneys General Act. Chhina seeks to pursue these claims in the form of a state-wide class action of current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITAS in California
within the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit. He seeks court determination that this action may be maintained as a class action for the entire California class and subclasses, designation as class representative, declaratory relief,
injunctive relief, damages (including wages for regular or overtime hours allegedly worked but not paid, premium payments for missed meal or rest period, and unreimbursed expenses), all applicable penalties associated with each claim,
pre-judgment interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Chhina served VITAS CA with the lawsuit, Jiwan Chhina v. VITAS Health Services of California,
Inc., a California corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation dba VITAS Healthcare Inc.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; San Diego
Superior Court Case Number 37-2015-00033978-CU-OE-CTL on November 3, 2016 (“Jiwann Chhina case”). On December 1, 2016, VITAS CA filed its Answer and served written discovery on Chhina.
On May 19, 2017, Chere Phillips (a Home Health Aide in Sacramento) and Lady Moore (a former Social Worker in Sacramento)
filed a lawsuit against VITAS CA in Sacramento County Superior Court, alleging claims for (1) failure to pay all wages due; (2) failure to authorize and permit rest periods; (3) failure to provide off-duty meal periods; (4) failure to furnish
accurate wage statements; (5) unreimbursed business expenses; (6) waiting time penalties; (7) violations of unfair competition law; and (8) violation of the Private Attorneys General Act. The case is captioned: Chere Phillips and Lady Moore v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2017-0021-2755. Plaintiffs sought to pursue
these claims in the form of a state-wide class action of current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITAS CA in California within the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit. Plaintiffs served VITAS with the lawsuit on June 5,
2017. VITAS CA timely answered the Complaint generally denying the Plaintiffs’ allegations. The Court has stayed all class discovery in this case pending resolution of mediation in the Jordan Seper and Jiwann Chhina cases.
There are currently three other lawsuits against VITAS pending in the superior courts of other California counties that
contain claims and class periods that substantially overlap with Phillips’ and Moore’s claims: the Jordan Seper and Jiwann Chhina cases, and Williams
v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, filed on May 22, 2017 in Alameda County Superior Court, RG 17853886.
Jazzina Williams’ (a Home Health Aide in Sacramento) lawsuit alleges claims for (1) failure to pay all wages due; (2)
failure to authorize and permit rest periods; (3) failure to provide off-duty meal periods; (4) failure to furnish accurate wage statements; (5) unreimbursed business expenses; (6) waiting time penalties; and (7) violations of the Private
Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). Williams seeks to pursue these claims both individually and as a representative action under the PAGA on behalf of current and former California non-exempt employees. Plaintiff served VITAS with the lawsuit on
May 31, 2017. VITAS CA timely answered the Complaint generally denying Plaintiff’s allegations. Williams is pursing discovery of her individual claim and has agreed to a stay of class discovery pending possible resolution through ongoing
mediation in the Jordan Seper and Jiwann Chhina cases. Defendant filed and served each of Plaintiffs Williams, Phillips, and Moore with a Notice of Related Cases on July 19, 2017.
The Seper and Chhina cases were consolidated in Los Angeles County Superior Court; Chhina was dismissed as a separate action and joined with Seper in the filing of amended complaint on August
28, 2018, in which both Chhina and Seper
were identified as named plaintiffs. The parties engaged in a mediation process beginning in October 2018 and concluded with an agreement in March 2019. The agreement is in the process of incorporation into a long-form agreement to be presented
to the court for preliminary approval, notice to class members, and eventual final approval and payment. The settlement amount, subject to court approval is $5.75 million plus employment taxes. The definition of the class to participate in the
settlement is intended to cover claims raised in the consolidated Seper/Chhina matter, claims raised in Phillips and Moore, as well as any class claims in Williams.
-25-
Alfred Lax (“Lax”), a current employee of Roto-Rooter Services Company (“RRSC”), was hired in the RRSC’s Menlo Park
branch in 2007. On November 30, 2018, Lax filed a class action lawsuit in Santa Clara County Superior Court alleging (1) failure to provide or compensate for required rest breaks; (2) failure to properly pay for all hours worked; (3) failure to
provide accurate wage statements; (4) failure to reimburse for work-related expenses; and (5) unfair business practices. Lax has stated these claims as a representative of a class defined as all service technicians employed by RRSC in California
during the four years preceding the filing of the complaint. He seeks a determination that the action may proceed and be maintained as a class action and for compensatory and statutory damages (premium payments for missed rest periods,
uncompensated rest periods, wages for time allegedly not paid such as travel time, repair time, and vehicle maintenance time, and unreimbursed expenses), penalties and restitutions, pre- and post-judgement interest and attorneys’ fees and costs.
The lawsuit, Alfred Lax, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Roto-Rooter Services Company, and Does 1 through 50 inclusive;
Santa Clara County Superior Court Case Number 18CV338652, was received by RRSC on December 11, 2018 and RRSC timely filed its answer denying the claims.
The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss for any of these lawsuits at
this time, with the exception of Seper/Chhina, Phillips and Moore, and the class claims in Williams.
The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in each of the above lawsuits. Regardless of the
outcome of any of the preceding matters, dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, diversion of management time, and related publicity. Although the
Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Results of Operations
Three months ended March 31, 2019 versus
2018 - Consolidated Results
Our service revenues and sales for the first quarter of 2019 increased 5.2% versus services and sales revenues for the
first quarter of 2018. Of this increase, a $14.8 million increase was attributable to VITAS and $8.1 million increase was attributable to Roto-Rooter. The following chart shows the components of revenue by operating segment (in thousands):
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||
VITAS
|
||||||||
Routine homecare
|
$
|
258,847
|
$
|
241,031
|
||||
Continuous care
|
32,244
|
30,766
|
||||||
General inpatient
|
22,570
|
22,108
|
||||||
Other
|
2,010
|
1,741
|
||||||
Medicare cap adjustment
|
(3,400
|
)
|
1,818
|
|||||
Room and board - net
|
(2,542
|
)
|
(2,618
|
)
|
||||
Implicit price concessions
|
(2,948
|
)
|
(2,833
|
)
|
||||
Roto-Rooter
|
||||||||
Drain cleaning - short term core
|
44,142
|
41,330
|
||||||
Plumbing - short term core
|
32,055
|
30,810
|
||||||
Subtotal
|
76,197
|
72,140
|
||||||
Excavation - short term core
|
34,285
|
31,321
|
||||||
Water restoration
|
27,652
|
27,737
|
||||||
Contractor operations
|
14,009
|
12,365
|
||||||
Outside franchisee fees
|
1,621
|
1,592
|
||||||
Other - short term core
|
577
|
625
|
||||||
Other
|
3,008
|
3,320
|
||||||
Implicit price concessions
|
(2,096
|
)
|
(1,937
|
)
|
||||
Total
|
$
|
462,034
|
$
|
439,176
|
Days of care at VITAS during the quarter ended March 31 were as follows:
Days of Care
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
||||
2019
|
2018
|
Percent
|
|||
Routine homecare
|
1,577,969
|
1,476,918
|
6.8
|
||
Continuous care
|
43,923
|
43,197
|
1.7
|
||
General inpatient
|
29,150
|
28,720
|
1.5
|
||
Total days of care
|
1,651,042
|
1,548,835
|
6.6
|
-26-
The remaining increase in VITAS’ revenues for the first quarter of 2019 versus the first quarter of 2018 was primarily
comprised of a geographically weighted average Medicare reimbursement rate increase of approximately 0.6% offset by $3.4 million in Medicare cap revenue reductions compared to Medicare cap reversal of $1.8 million in 2018. This growth is
partially offset by the combination of acuity mix shift, fluctuations in net room and board and contractual adjustments that negatively impacted revenue growth 0.4% when compared to the prior-year period. Over 90% of VITAS’ service revenues for
the period were from Medicare and Medicaid.
The increase in plumbing revenues for the first quarter of 2019 versus 2018 is attributable to a 5.5% increase in price
and service mix shift offset by a 1.5% decrease in job count. The increase in excavation revenues for the first quarter of 2019 versus 2018 is attributable to a 16.3% increase in price and service mix shift offset by a 6.8% decrease in job
count. Drain cleaning revenues for the first quarter of 2019 versus 2018 reflect a 5.0% increase in price and service mix shift and a 1.8% increase in job count. Water restoration revenue for the first quarter of 2019 versus 2018 was
essentially flat. Contractor operations increased 13.3% mainly due to their expansion into water restoration.
The consolidated gross margin was
30.3% in the first quarter of 2019 as compared with 30.7% in the first quarter of 2018. On a segment basis, VITAS’ gross margin was 21.9% in the first quarter of 2019 as compared with 22.1%, in the first quarter of 2018. The Roto-Rooter
segment’s gross margin was 47.0% for the first quarter of 2019 compared with 47.5% in the first quarter of 2018.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) comprise (in thousands):
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||
SG&A expenses before long-term incentive compensation and the impact of
|
||||||||
market value adjustments related to deferred compensation trusts
|
$
|
70,203
|
$
|
66,220
|
||||
Impact of market value adjustments related to assets held in deferred
|
||||||||
compensation trusts
|
2,338
|
860
|
||||||
Long-term incentive compensation
|
1,488
|
1,920
|
||||||
Total SG&A expenses
|
$
|
74,029
|
$
|
69,000
|
Other operating expenses increased $6.4 million from the first quarter of 2018 primarily as a result of a $6.0 million
litigation settlement at VITAS recorded in the first quarter of 2019.
Other income - net comprise (in thousands):
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
|
2018 |
||||||
Market value adjustment on assets held in
|
||||||||
deferred compensation trusts
|
$
|
2,338
|
$
|
860
|
||||
Interest income
|
101
|
158
|
||||||
Total other income - net
|
$
|
2,439
|
$
|
1,018
|
Our effective tax rate reconciliation is as follows:
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||
Income tax provision calculated at the statutory federal rate
|
$
|
10,665
|
$
|
11,804
|
||||
Stock compensation tax benefits
|
(6,732
|
)
|
(3,798
|
)
|
||||
State and local income taxes
|
1,128
|
2,325
|
||||||
Other--net
|
1,059
|
881
|
||||||
Income tax provision
|
$
|
6,120
|
$
|
11,212
|
||||
Effective tax rate
|
12.1
|
%
|
19.9
|
%
|
-27-
Net income for both periods included the following after-tax items/adjustments that (reduced) or increased after-tax
earnings (in thousands):
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||
VITAS
|
||||||||
Litigation settlement
|
$
|
(4,476
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
|||
Non cash ASC 842 expenses
|
(489
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment
|
(387
|
)
|
(263
|
)
|
||||
Roto-Rooter
|
||||||||
Amortization of acquired and cancelled franchise agreements
|
(324
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Non cash ASC 842 expenses
|
(40
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Corporate
|
||||||||
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation
|
6,732
|
3,798
|
||||||
Stock option expense
|
(3,327
|
)
|
(2,891
|
)
|
||||
Long-term incentive compensation
|
(1,230
|
)
|
(1,499
|
)
|
||||
Non cash ASC 842 benefit
|
124
|
-
|
||||||
Acquisition expenses
|
(91
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
(3,508
|
)
|
$
|
(855
|
)
|
Three months ended March 31, 2019 versus
2018 - Segment Results
Net income/(loss) for the first quarter of 2019 versus the first quarter of 2018 by segment (in thousands):
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
|
2018 |
||||||
VITAS
|
$
|
29,288
|
$
|
32,015
|
||||
Roto-Rooter
|
22,986
|
22,938
|
||||||
Corporate
|
(7,607
|
)
|
(9,957
|
)
|
||||
$
|
44,667
|
$
|
44,996
|
VITAS’ after-tax earnings were positively impacted in 2019 compared to 2018 due to higher revenue offset by the impact
of a litigation settlement of approximately $6.0 million ($4.5 million after-tax). After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue at VITAS in the first quarter of 2019 was 9.5% as compared to 11.0% in the first quarter of 2018.
Roto-Rooter’s net income was positively impacted in 2019 compared to 2018 primarily by higher revenue. After-tax
earnings as a percent of revenue at Roto-Rooter in the first quarter of 2019 was 14.8% as compared to 15.6% in the first quarter of 2018.
After-tax Corporate expenses for 2019 decreased 23.6% when compared to 2018 due mainly to a $2.9 million increase in tax
benefit related to the adoption of ASU 2016-09.
-28-
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
|
||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2019
|
||||||||||||||||
(in thousands)(unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Chemed |
|||||||||||||||
VITAS
|
|
Roto-Rooter
|
|
Corporate |
|
Consolidated |
||||||||||
2019 (a)
|
||||||||||||||||
Service revenues and sales
|
$
|
306,781
|
$
|
155,253
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
462,034
|
||||||||
Cost of services provided and goods sold
|
239,743
|
82,208
|
-
|
321,951
|
||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
21,536
|
39,601
|
12,892
|
74,029
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
4,708
|
4,963
|
39
|
9,710
|
||||||||||||
Amortization
|
18
|
501
|
-
|
519
|
||||||||||||
Other operating income
|
6,354
|
(1
|
)
|
-
|
6,353
|
|||||||||||
Total costs and expenses
|
272,359
|
127,272
|
12,931
|
412,562
|
||||||||||||
Income/(loss) from operations
|
34,422
|
27,981
|
(12,931
|
)
|
49,472
|
|||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(47
|
)
|
(95
|
)
|
(982
|
)
|
(1,124
|
)
|
||||||||
Intercompany interest income/(expense)
|
4,394
|
2,195
|
(6,589
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Other income—net
|
88
|
14
|
2,337
|
2,439
|
||||||||||||
Income/(expense) before income taxes
|
38,857
|
30,095
|
(18,165
|
)
|
50,787
|
|||||||||||
Income taxes
|
(9,569
|
)
|
(7,109
|
)
|
10,558
|
(6,120
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net income/(loss)
|
$
|
29,288
|
$
|
22,986
|
$
|
(7,607
|
)
|
$
|
44,667
|
|||||||
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Chemed |
|||||||||||||||
VITAS
|
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
Corporate |
|
Consolidated |
||||||||||
Pretax benefit/(cost):
|
||||||||||||||||
Litigation settlement
|
$
|
(6,000
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(6,000
|
)
|
||||||
Stock option expense
|
-
|
-
|
(4,089
|
)
|
(4,089
|
)
|
||||||||||
Long-term incentive compensation
|
-
|
-
|
(1,488
|
)
|
(1,488
|
)
|
||||||||||
Non cash ASC 842 (expenses)/benefit
|
(656
|
)
|
(55
|
)
|
163
|
(548
|
)
|
|||||||||
Medicare cap sequestration
|
(515
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(515
|
)
|
||||||||||
Amortization of acquired and cancelled franchise agreements
|
-
|
(441
|
)
|
-
|
(441
|
)
|
||||||||||
Acquisition expenses
|
-
|
-
|
(120
|
)
|
(120
|
)
|
||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
(7,171
|
)
|
$
|
(496
|
)
|
$
|
(5,534
|
)
|
$
|
(13,201
|
)
|
||||
|
Chemed |
|||||||||||||||
VITAS
|
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
Corporate |
|
Consolidated |
||||||||||
After-tax benefit/(cost):
|
||||||||||||||||
Litigation settlement
|
$
|
(4,476
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(4,476
|
)
|
||||||
Stock option expense
|
-
|
-
|
(3,327
|
)
|
(3,327
|
)
|
||||||||||
Long-term incentive compensation
|
-
|
-
|
(1,230
|
)
|
(1,230
|
)
|
||||||||||
Non cash ASC 842 (expenses)/benefit
|
(489
|
)
|
(40
|
)
|
124
|
(405
|
)
|
|||||||||
Medicare cap sequestration
|
(387
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(387
|
)
|
||||||||||
Amortization of acquired and cancelled franchise agreements
|
-
|
(324
|
)
|
-
|
(324
|
)
|
||||||||||
Acquisition expenses
|
-
|
-
|
(91
|
)
|
(91
|
)
|
||||||||||
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation
|
-
|
-
|
6,732
|
6,732
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
(5,352
|
)
|
$
|
(364
|
)
|
$
|
2,208
|
$
|
(3,508
|
)
|
-29-
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
|
||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018
|
||||||||||||||||
(in thousands)(unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Chemed |
|||||||||||||||
VITAS
|
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
Corporate |
|
Consolidated |
||||||||||
2018 (a)
|
||||||||||||||||
Service revenues and sales
|
$
|
292,013
|
$
|
147,163
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
439,176
|
||||||||
Cost of services provided and goods sold
|
227,256
|
77,280
|
-
|
304,536
|
||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
20,510
|
36,098
|
12,392
|
69,000
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
4,797
|
4,443
|
27
|
9,267
|
||||||||||||
Amortization
|
-
|
27
|
-
|
27
|
||||||||||||
Other operating expenses
|
(18
|
)
|
(33
|
)
|
-
|
(51
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total costs and expenses
|
252,545
|
117,815
|
12,419
|
382,779
|
||||||||||||
Income/(loss) from operations
|
39,468
|
29,348
|
(12,419
|
)
|
56,397
|
|||||||||||
Interest expense
|
(52
|
)
|
(91
|
)
|
(1,064
|
)
|
(1,207
|
)
|
||||||||
Intercompany interest income/(expense)
|
3,095
|
1,677
|
(4,772
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Other income—net
|
142
|
16
|
860
|
1,018
|
||||||||||||
Income/(expense) before income taxes
|
42,653
|
30,950
|
(17,395
|
)
|
56,208
|
|||||||||||
Income taxes
|
(10,638
|
)
|
(8,012
|
)
|
7,438
|
(11,212
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net income/(loss)
|
$
|
32,015
|
$
|
22,938
|
$
|
(9,957
|
)
|
$
|
44,996
|
|||||||
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Chemed |
|||||||||||||||
VITAS
|
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
Corporate |
|
Consolidated |
||||||||||
Pretax benefit/(cost):
|
||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(3,653
|
)
|
$
|
(3,653
|
)
|
||||||
Long-term incentive compensation
|
-
|
-
|
(1,920
|
)
|
(1,920
|
)
|
||||||||||
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment
|
(352
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(352
|
)
|
||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
(352
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(5,573
|
)
|
$
|
(5,925
|
)
|
|||||
|
Chemed |
|||||||||||||||
VITAS
|
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
Corporate |
|
Consolidated |
||||||||||
After-tax benefit/(cost):
|
||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(2,891
|
)
|
$
|
(2,891
|
)
|
||||||
Long-term incentive compensation
|
-
|
-
|
(1,499
|
)
|
(1,499
|
)
|
||||||||||
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment
|
(263
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(263
|
)
|
||||||||||
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation
|
-
|
-
|
3,798
|
3,798
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
(263
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(592
|
)
|
$
|
(855
|
)
|
-30-
Unaudited Consolidating Summary and Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
|
||||||||||||||||
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
|
||||||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
|
Chemed |
||||||||||||||
For the three months ended March 31, 2019
|
|
VITAS |
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
Corporate |
|
Consolidated |
||||||||
Net income/(loss)
|
$
|
29,288
|
$
|
22,986
|
$
|
(7,607
|
)
|
$
|
44,667
|
|||||||
Add/(deduct):
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
47
|
95
|
982
|
1,124
|
||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
9,569
|
7,109
|
(10,558
|
)
|
6,120
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation
|
4,708
|
4,963
|
39
|
9,710
|
||||||||||||
Amortization
|
18
|
501
|
-
|
519
|
||||||||||||
EBITDA
|
43,630
|
35,654
|
(17,144
|
)
|
62,140
|
|||||||||||
Add/(deduct):
|
||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest expense/(income)
|
(4,394
|
)
|
(2,195
|
)
|
6,589
|
-
|
||||||||||
Interest income
|
(88
|
)
|
(14
|
)
|
-
|
(102
|
)
|
|||||||||
Litigation settlement
|
6,000
|
-
|
-
|
6,000
|
||||||||||||
Non cash ASC 842 expenses/(benefit)
|
656
|
55
|
(163
|
)
|
548
|
|||||||||||
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment
|
515
|
-
|
-
|
515
|
||||||||||||
Acquisition Expenses
|
-
|
-
|
120
|
120
|
||||||||||||
Stock option expense
|
-
|
-
|
4,089
|
4,089
|
||||||||||||
Long-term incentive compensation
|
-
|
-
|
1,488
|
1,488
|
||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
46,319
|
$
|
33,500
|
$
|
(5,021
|
)
|
$
|
74,798
|
|||||||
|
Chemed |
|||||||||||||||
For the three months ended March 31, 2018
|
|
VITAS |
|
Roto-Rooter |
|
Corporate |
|
Consolidated |
||||||||
Net income/(loss)
|
$
|
32,015
|
$
|
22,938
|
$
|
(9,957
|
)
|
$
|
44,996
|
|||||||
Add/(deduct):
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
52
|
91
|
1,064
|
1,207
|
||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
10,638
|
8,012
|
(7,438
|
)
|
11,212
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation
|
4,797
|
4,443
|
27
|
9,267
|
||||||||||||
Amortization
|
-
|
27
|
-
|
27
|
||||||||||||
EBITDA
|
47,502
|
35,511
|
(16,304
|
)
|
66,709
|
|||||||||||
Add/(deduct):
|
||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest expense/(income)
|
(3,095
|
)
|
(1,677
|
)
|
4,772
|
-
|
||||||||||
Interest income
|
(142
|
)
|
(16
|
)
|
-
|
(158
|
)
|
|||||||||
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment
|
352
|
-
|
-
|
352
|
||||||||||||
Amortization of stock awards
|
70
|
65
|
156
|
291
|
||||||||||||
Stock option expense
|
-
|
-
|
3,653
|
3,653
|
||||||||||||
Long-term incentive compensation
|
-
|
-
|
1,920
|
1,920
|
||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA
|
$
|
44,687
|
$
|
33,883
|
$
|
(5,803
|
)
|
$
|
72,767
|
-31-
RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME
|
||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data)(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2019
|
2018
|
|||||||
Net income as reported
|
$
|
44,667
|
$
|
44,996
|
||||
Add/(deduct) pre-tax cost of:
|
||||||||
Litigation settlement
|
6,000
|
-
|
||||||
Stock option expense
|
4,089
|
3,653
|
||||||
Long-term incentive compensation
|
1,488
|
1,920
|
||||||
Non cash ASC 842 expenses
|
548
|
-
|
||||||
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment
|
515
|
352
|
||||||
Amortization of acquired and cancelled franchise agreements
|
441
|
-
|
||||||
Acquisition expenses
|
120
|
-
|
||||||
Add/(deduct) tax impacts:
|
||||||||
Tax impact of the above pre-tax adjustments (1)
|
(2,961
|
)
|
(1,272
|
)
|
||||
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation
|
(6,732
|
)
|
(3,798
|
)
|
||||
Adjusted net income
|
$
|
48,175
|
$
|
45,851
|
||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share As Reported
|
||||||||
Net income
|
$
|
2.70
|
$
|
2.66
|
||||
Average number of shares outstanding
|
16,525
|
16,887
|
||||||
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
||||||||
Adjusted net income
|
$
|
2.92
|
$
|
2.72
|
||||
Adjusted average number of shares outstanding
|
16,525
|
16,887
|
||||||
(1) The tax impact of pre-tax adjustments was calculated using the effective tax rate of the operating unit for which each adjustment
is associated.
|
-32-
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
|
||||||||
OPERATING STATISTICS FOR VITAS SEGMENT
|
||||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
OPERATING STATISTICS
|
2019
|
2018
|
||||||
Net revenue ($000)
|
||||||||
Homecare
|
$
|
258,847
|
$
|
241,031
|
||||
Inpatient
|
22,570
|
22,108
|
||||||
Continuous care
|
32,244
|
30,766
|
||||||
Other
|
2,010
|
1,741
|
||||||
Subtotal
|
$
|
315,671
|
$
|
295,646
|
||||
Room and board, net
|
(2,542
|
)
|
(2,618
|
)
|
||||
Contractual allowances
|
(2,948
|
)
|
(2,833
|
)
|
||||
Medicare cap allowance
|
(3,400
|
)
|
1,818
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
306,781
|
$
|
292,013
|
||||
Net revenue as a percent of total before Medicare cap allowances
|
||||||||
Homecare
|
82.0
|
%
|
81.5
|
%
|
||||
Inpatient
|
7.1
|
7.5
|
||||||
Continuous care
|
10.2
|
10.4
|
||||||
Other
|
0.7
|
0.6
|
||||||
Subtotal
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
||||||
Room and board, net
|
(0.9
|
)
|
(0.9
|
)
|
||||
Contractual allowances
|
(1.0
|
)
|
(0.9
|
)
|
||||
Medicare cap allowance
|
(0.9
|
)
|
0.6
|
|||||
Total
|
97.2
|
%
|
98.8
|
%
|
||||
Average daily census (days)
|
||||||||
Homecare
|
14,243
|
13,162
|
||||||
Nursing home
|
3,254
|
3,215
|
||||||
Routine homecare
|
17,497
|
16,377
|
||||||
Inpatient
|
360
|
352
|
||||||
Continuous care
|
488
|
480
|
||||||
Total
|
18,345
|
17,209
|
||||||
Total Admissions
|
17,758
|
18,279
|
||||||
Total Discharges
|
17,339
|
17,558
|
||||||
Average length of stay (days)
|
91.3
|
87.9
|
||||||
Median length of stay (days)
|
15.0
|
15.0
|
||||||
ADC by major diagnosis
|
||||||||
Cerebro
|
35.6
|
%
|
36.2
|
%
|
||||
Neurological
|
19.9
|
18.5
|
||||||
Cancer
|
13.1
|
13.9
|
||||||
Cardio
|
16.9
|
16.4
|
||||||
Respiratory
|
8.2
|
8.2
|
||||||
Other
|
6.3
|
6.8
|
||||||
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
||||
Admissions by major diagnosis
|
||||||||
Cerebro
|
20.7
|
22.6
|
%
|
|||||
Neurological
|
12.8
|
11.4
|
||||||
Cancer
|
28.0
|
28.0
|
||||||
Cardio
|
16.3
|
15.5
|
||||||
Respiratory
|
12.0
|
11.7
|
||||||
Other
|
10.2
|
10.8
|
||||||
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
||||
Direct patient care margins
|
||||||||
Routine homecare
|
52.7
|
%
|
52.1
|
%
|
||||
Inpatient
|
6.5
|
7.5
|
||||||
Continuous care
|
18.2
|
17.7
|
||||||
Homecare margin drivers (dollars per patient day)
|
||||||||
Labor costs
|
$
|
59.42
|
$
|
58.63
|
||||
Combined drug, HME and medical supplies
|
13.08
|
14.47
|
||||||
Inpatient margin drivers (dollars per patient day)
|
||||||||
Labor costs
|
$
|
364.62
|
$
|
362.75
|
||||
Continuous care margin drivers (dollars per patient day)
|
||||||||
Labor costs
|
$
|
582.54
|
$
|
567.51
|
||||
Estimated uncollectible accounts as a percent of revenues
|
1.0
|
%
|
1.0
|
%
|
||||
Accounts receivable -- Days of revenue outstanding- excluding unapplied Medicare payments
|
34.9
|
32.6
|
||||||
Accounts receivable -- Days of revenue outstanding- including unapplied Medicare payments
|
23.3
|
22.6
|
-33-
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Certain statements contained in this report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “believe”, “expect”, “hope”, “anticipate”, “plan” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. These forward-looking
statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and involve various known and unknown risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other factors, which could cause Chemed’s actual results to differ from those expressed in such
forward-looking statements. Variances in any or all of the risks, uncertainties, contingencies, and other factors from our assumptions could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements and trends. In
addition, our ability to deal with the unknown outcomes of these events, many of which are beyond our control, may affect the reliability of projections and other financial matters. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements
are subject to inherent risk and there are no assurances that the matters contained in such statements will be achieved. Chemed does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of a new information, future events or otherwise.
The Company’s primary market risk exposure relates to interest rate risk exposure through its variable interest line of
credit. At March 31, 2019, the Company had $100.0 million of variable rate debt outstanding. For each $10 million dollars borrowed under the credit facility, an increase or decrease of 100 basis points (1% point), increases or decreases the
Company’s annual interest expense by $100,000.
The Company continually evaluates this interest rate exposure and periodically weighs the cost versus the benefit of
fixing the variable interest rates through a variety of hedging techniques.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of our President and Chief Executive Officer and with the
participation of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and the Vice President and Controller, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report. Based on that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Vice President and Controller have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as
of the end of the period covered by this report. Except as discussed below, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
In the first quarter of 2019, we implemented a new lease accounting system and process in response to the adoption of
ASC 842, effective January 1, 2019. These implementations resulted in changes to components of our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
For information regarding the Company’s legal proceedings, see note 11, Legal and Regulatory Matters, under Part I, Item I
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
-34-
Item 2(c). Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table shows the activity related to our share repurchase program for the first three months of 2019:
Total Number
|
Weighted Average
|
Cumulative Shares
|
Dollar Amount
|
|||||||||||||
of Shares
|
Price Paid Per
|
Repurchased Under
|
Remaining Under
|
|||||||||||||
Repurchased
|
Share
|
the Program
|
The Program
|
|||||||||||||
February 2011
Program
|
||||||||||||||||
January 1 through January 31, 2019
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
8,376,864
|
$
|
46,649,495
|
||||||||||
February 1 through February 28, 2019
|
91,893
|
327.84
|
8,468,757
|
166,522,918
|
||||||||||||
March 1 through March 31, 2019
|
58,107
|
329.10
|
8,526,864
|
$
|
147,399,943
|
|||||||||||
First Quarter Total
|
150,000
|
$
|
328.33
|
On February 22, 2019 our Board of Directors authorized an additional $150 million under the February 2011 Repurchase Program.
None.
None.
None.
-35-
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
|
32.3
|
||
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Chemed Corporation
|
|||||
(Registrant)
|
|||||
Dated:
|
May 2, 2019
|
By:
|
/s/ Kevin J. McNamara
|
||
Kevin J. McNamara
|
|||||
(President and Chief Executive Officer)
|
|||||
Dated:
|
May 2, 2019
|
By:
|
/s/ David P. Williams
|
||
David P. Williams
|
|||||
(Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)
|
|||||
Dated:
|
May 2, 2019
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael D. Witzeman
|
||
Michael D. Witzeman
|
|||||
(Vice President and Controller)
|
-1-