ChromaDex Corp. - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
[X]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For
the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017
or
[
] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For
the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-37752
CHROMADEX
CORPORATION
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
Delaware
|
|
26-2940963
|
(State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
10005 Muirlands Blvd. Suite G, Irvine,
California
|
|
92618
|
(Address of
Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code (949) 419-0288
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each class
|
|
Name
of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
Common Stock,
$0.001 par value
|
|
The NASDAQ Capital
Market
|
Indicate by check
mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X
]
Indicate by check
mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No
[X]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post
such files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part
III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [
]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated
filer,” “large accelerated filer,” and
“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [X] Non-accelerated filer [
] (Do not check if smaller reporting
company)
Smaller
reporting company [ ] Emerging growth company [ ]
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financing accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
As of
June 30, 2017, the last business day of the registrant’s most
recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market
value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates
of the registrant was approximately $144.8 million, based on the
closing price of the registrant’s common stock on the NASDAQ
Capital Market on June 30, 2017.
Number
of shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding as of March
8, 2018: 54,836,076.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the Registrant’s proxy statement (the “Proxy
Statement”) to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Regulation 14A in
connection with the registrant’s 2018 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, which will be filed subsequent to the date hereof,
are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form
10‑K. Such
Proxy Statement will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days
following the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended
December 30, 2017.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
||
|
|
15
|
||
|
|
32
|
||
|
|
32
|
||
|
|
32
|
||
|
|
34
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
||
|
|
37
|
||
|
|
39
|
||
|
|
52
|
||
|
|
53
|
||
|
|
91
|
||
|
|
91
|
||
|
|
92
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
||
|
|
93
|
||
|
|
93
|
||
|
|
93
|
||
|
|
93
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
||
|
|
100
|
||
|
|
|
|
PART I
CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) contains
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, which are subject to the safe harbor
created by those sections.
We may,
in some cases, use words such as “anticipate,”
“believe,” “could,” “estimate,”
“expect,” “intend,” “intend,”
“may,” “plan,” “potential,”
“predict,” “project,” “should,”
“will,” “would” or the negative of these
terms, and similar expressions that convey uncertainty of future
events or outcomes to identify these forward-looking statements.
Any statements contained herein that are not statements of
historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements and
are based upon our current expectations, beliefs, estimates and
projections, and various assumptions, many of which, by their
nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond our control. Such
statements, include, but are not limited to, statements contained
in this Form 10-K relating to our business, business strategy,
products and services we may offer in the future, the outcome and
impact of litigation, the timing and results of future regulatory
filings, the timing and results of future clinical trials, our
ability to collect from major customers, sales and marketing
strategy and capital outlook. Forward-looking statements are based
on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business,
the economy and other future conditions. Because forward looking
statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent
uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are
difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from
those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. They are
neither statement of historical fact nor guarantees of assurance of
future performance. We caution you therefore against relying on any
of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward
looking statements include, but are not limited to, a decline in
general economic conditions nationally and internationally;
decreased demand for our products and services; market acceptance of our products;
the ability to protect our intellectual property rights; impact of
any litigation or infringement actions brought against us;
competition from other providers and products; risks in product
development; inability to raise capital to fund continuing
operations; changes in government regulation; the ability to
complete customer transactions and capital raising transactions,
and other factors (including the risks contained in Item 1A of this
Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors”) relating to
our industry, our operations and results of operations and any
businesses that may be acquired by us. Should one or more of these
risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the underlying
assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ
significantly from those anticipated, believed, estimated,
expected, intended or planned.
Factors
or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge
from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of
them, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business
or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may
cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in
any forward-looking statements we may make. Given these
uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements. We cannot guarantee future results,
levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required
by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to and do not intend
to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these
statements to actual results.
Unless
otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, references
to the “Company”, “ChromaDex”,
“we”, “us” and “our” refer to
ChromaDex Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
Company Overview
ChromaDex
is a science-based integrated nutraceutical company devoted to
pioneering technologies that improve the way people age. ChromaDex
engages with and supports many of the world's leading research
institutions and scientists that are diligently working to
understand the full potential of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
("NAD") and its impact on human health.
NAD is
an essential coenzyme and a key regulator of cellular metabolism.
Best known for its role in cellular adenosine triphosphate ("ATP")
production, NAD is now thought to play an important role in healthy
aging. Many cellular functions related to health and healthy aging
are sensitive to levels of locally available NAD and this
represents an active area of research in the field of
NAD.
NAD
levels are not constant, and in humans, NAD levels have been shown
to decline by more than 50% from young adulthood to middle age. NAD
continues to decline as humans grow older. There are other causes
of reduced NAD levels such as over-nutrition, alcohol consumption
and a number of disease states. NAD may also be increased,
including through calorie restriction and exercise. Healthy aging,
mitochondria and NAD continue to be areas of focus in the research
community. In 2017, there were over 150 studies on
NAD.
In 2013, ChromaDex commercialized NIAGEN® nicotinamide
riboside ("NR"), a novel form of vitamin B3. Data from numerous
animal studies, and confirmed in human clinical trials, show that
NR is a highly efficient NAD precursor that significantly raises
NAD levels. NIAGEN is safe for human consumption with no adverse
side effects. NIAGEN® has twice been successfully reviewed
under FDA's new dietary ingredient (“NDI”) notification
program, and has also been successfully notified to the FDA as
generally recognized as safe (“GRAS”). Animal studies
of NIAGEN® have demonstrated a variety of outcomes ranging
from increased NAD levels, increased cellular metabolism and energy
production to improvements in insulin sensitivity. NIAGEN® is
the trade name for our proprietary ingredient NR, and protected by
patents to which we are the exclusive
licensee.
ChromaDex
is the world leader in the emerging NAD space. ChromaDex has over
140 partnerships with leading universities and research
institutions around the world including the National Institutes of
Health, Cornell, Dartmouth, Harvard, Scripps Research Institute and
the Mayo Clinic. Other relationships are currently being
developed.
Our
scientific advisory board is led by Chairman Dr. Roger Kornberg,
Nobel Laureate Stanford Professor, Dr. Charles Brenner, one of the
world’s recognized experts in NAD and inventor of
nicotinamide riboside, Dr. Rudi Tanzi, the co-chair of the
department of neurology at Harvard Medical School and one of the
world’s leading experts in food and nutrition, Dr. Bruce
German, Chairman of food, nutrition and health at the University of
California, Davis, Dr. Robert Beudeker, Vice President of
Innovation, who leads the innovation program for human nutrition
and health at DSM, and Dr. Matthew Roberts, Chief Technical and
Quality Officer at Pharmavite, who has over 25 years of success at
Abbott, Nestle and Nature's Bounty Co.
STRATEGIC SHIFT TO GLOBAL CONSUMER PRODUCT COMPANY
The
acquisition in March 2017 of Healthspan Research LLC, a company
that sold our TRU NIAGEN® product direct to consumers, marked
our strategic shift from an ingredient and testing company to a
global, consumer focused nutraceutical company. ChromaDex made the
strategic decision to commercialize TRU NIAGEN® as a consumer
brand, launching the consumer product in 2017.
In
connection with our strategic decision to grow our global consumer
brand, we have reduced the number of active NIAGEN® ingredient
supply agreements. As expected, our ingredients segment net sales
decreased 34% in 2017, from $16.8 million in 2016 to $11.1 million,
which loss was offset by $5.5 million in net sales of TRU
NIAGEN®.
We
believe the global market size for TRU NIAGEN® is substantial.
According to Orbis Research, Global Anti-Aging Market Research
Report and Forecast 2017-2022, June 19, 2017, over $250 billion was
spent on the business of youth worldwide in 2016 on looking, acting
and feeling younger, which included skin care, cosmetic surgery,
hair restoration, fitness, vitamins and supplements. According to
the same report from Orbis Research, the worldwide anti-aging
market is expected to grow at a compounded average growth rate
("CAGR") of 5.8% through 2021 to about $330 billion.
We
began the international expansion of our TRU NIAGEN® brand
with the launch in Hong Kong and Macau with our strategic partner,
Customer G, in the third quarter of 2017, followed by the launch in
Singapore in the first quarter of 2018. We will continue to focus on
obtaining additional regulatory approvals required to expand our
marketing and distribution of our TRU NIAGEN® brand in new
strategic international markets.
INGREDIENTS AND CORE STANDARDS AND CONTRACT SERVICES BUSINESS
SEGMENTS
Through
our ingredients business segment, we will continue to sell
NIAGEN® in ingredient form to our remaining customers that we
have supply contracts with. We will also continue to develop and
commercialize proprietary ingredients other than
NIAGEN®.
We are
a leading provider of research and quality-control products and
services to the natural products industry. Through our core
standards and contract services segment, customers worldwide in the
dietary supplement, food and beverage, cosmetic and pharmaceutical
industries use our products, which are small quantities of
highly-characterized, research-grade, plant-based materials, to
ensure the quality of their raw materials and finished products. We
have conducted this core standards and contract services business
since 1999.
We
believe there is a growing need at both the manufacturing and
government regulatory levels for reference standards to ensure that
products that contain plants, plant extracts and naturally
occurring compounds distributed to consumers are safe. We further
believe that this need is driven by the perception at the consumer
level regarding a lack of adequate quality controls related to
certain functional food or dietary supplement based products, as
well as increased effort on the part of the Food and Drug
Administration (“FDA”) to assure Good Manufacturing
Practices (“GMP”).
Our
core standards and contract service business segment provides us
with the opportunity to become aware of the results from research
and screening activities performed on thousands of potential
natural product candidates through our relationships with various
universities and research institutions. By selecting the most
promising ingredients leveraged from this market-based screening
model, which is grounded by primary research performed through
leading universities and institutions, followed by selective
investments in further research and development, new proprietary
ingredients can be identified and brought to various markets with a
much lower investment cost and an increased chance of
success. Through our
regulatory consulting operations, we also provide our clients in
the food, supplement and pharmaceutical industries with effective
scientific solutions to manage their potential health and
regulatory risks.
On
January 5, 2017, we opened a 10,000 square foot research and
development laboratory in Longmont, Colorado. The new laboratory
will support the discovery and development of molecules and
compounds that add to our proprietary ingredient portfolio, while
also allowing for the research service offerings.
For the
fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January
2, 2016, our revenues from continuing operations were approximately
$21.2 million, $21.7 million and $17.9 million, respectively. The
following table summarizes the Company’s total sales for each
of the business segments in the last 3 years. Please refer to Item
8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K for additional financial information for each of the
business segments.
Fiscal
Years
|
Ingredients
Segment
|
Consumer
Products
Segment
|
Core
Standards and Contract Services Segment
|
Total
|
2017
|
$11.1
million
|
$5.5
million
|
$4.6
million
|
$21.2
million
|
2016
|
$16.8
million
|
-
|
$4.9
million
|
$21.7
million
|
2015
|
$12.5
million
|
-
|
$5.4
million
|
$17.9
million
|
Company Background
On May
21, 2008, Cody Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation and a public
company, (“Cody”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Cody, CDI
Acquisition, Inc., a California corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Cody (“Acquisition Sub”), and ChromaDex,
Inc. (the “Merger”). Subsequent to the signing of the
Merger Agreement, Cody merged with and into a Delaware corporation.
On June 20, 2008, Cody amended its articles of incorporation to
change its name to ChromaDex Corporation. ChromaDex Corporation was
traded on the Over the Counter market under the symbol "CDXC." On
April 25, 2016, ChromaDex Corporation became listed on the NASDAQ
under the symbol "CDXC."
ChromaDex,
Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of ChromaDex Corporation, was
originally formed as a California corporation on February 19,
2000. On April 23, 2003, ChromaDex Inc. acquired the research
and development group of a competing natural product company, Napro
Biotherapeutics, located in Boulder, Colorado. The assets acquired
in this transaction were placed in a newly-formed, wholly-owned
subsidiary of ChromaDex Inc. named ChromaDex Analytics, Inc., a
Nevada corporation.
On
December 3, 2012, ChromaDex, Inc. acquired Spherix Consulting Inc.,
a scientific and regulatory consulting company located in the
greater Washington D.C. area and Spherix became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of ChromaDex, Inc. On December 31, 2016, Spherix
Consulting, Inc. merged into ChromaDex, Inc. and subsequently was
dissolved. On March 12, 2017, ChromaDex Corporation acquired
Healthspan Research LLC, a consumer product company offering TRU
NIAGEN® branded products. This marked the strategic shift to
become a fully integrated nutraceutical Company. On September 5,
2017, the Company completed the sale of its operating assets that
were used with the Company's quality verification program testing
and analytical chemistry business for food and food related
products to Covance Laboratories Inc.
Business Market
According
to Orbis Research, Global Anti-Aging Market Research Report and
Forecast 2017-2022, June 19, 2017, over $250 billion was spent on
the business of youth worldwide in 2016 on looking, acting and
feeling younger, which included skin care, cosmetic surgery, hair
restoration, fitness, vitamins and supplements. According to the
same report from Orbis Research, the worldwide anti-aging market is
expected to grow at a CAGR of 5.8% through 2021 to about $330
billion. According to the data from Euromonitor International, the
worldwide market for vitamins and supplements was approximately $91
billion in 2016, and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 5.7% to about
$127 billion in 2022.
Business Model
CONSUMER PRODUCTS SEGMENT
Our
business model is to sell TRU NIAGEN® to consumers worldwide.
As a world leader in the emerging NAD space and the science of
aging, we will continue to seek to discover and enhance patented
technology and evolve our branded TRU NIAGEN® products to
improve health by safely raising NAD levels. The TRU NIAGEN®
brand is built on scientific evidence, trust and the direct impact
to our consumers aging better. The best way to be trusted as a
brand is to be trustworthy as a company.
We
intend to capture the worldwide NAD-related healthy aging market by
entering into new international markets. We will utilize our
proprietary ecommerce platforms, and the ecommerce and brick and
mortar platforms of strategic regional and local partners. Our
United States ("U.S.") based business will continue to support our
global operations, including:
●
Corporate
development and strategy
●
Research and
development activities
●
Science
●
Global premium
brand management and brand guidelines
●
Multi-platform
global marketing campaigns and know-how
●
Build and evolve
propriety ecommerce platform and data analytics
●
Global
manufacturing and supply chain operations
We
expect to continue to supply our international operations with
finished products manufactured in the U.S, and to continue to
provide all our marketing materials and know-how to our
international strategic partners.
INGREDIENTS SEGMENT
We will
also continue to identify, acquire, reduce-to-practice, and
commercialize other innovative new proprietary ingredients and
technologies, with an initial industry focus on the dietary
supplement, food, beverage, skin care and pharmaceutical markets.
We have an experienced team that is highly capable of advancing
products through development into commercialization with the
required regulatory approval, safety, toxicology, clinical trials,
supply chain management, manufacturing, and ultimately either
directly selling the products or licensing to third parties. Our
clinical trials will potentially reinforce the health benefits that
may be associated with our proprietary ingredients, improve the
quality or specificity of FDA approved claim we can make with
respect to these health benefits, and lead us toward pharmaceutical
applications for our proprietary ingredients.
CORE STANDARDS AND CONTRACT SERVICES SEGMENT
We have
taken advantage of both supply chain needs and regulatory
requirements such as the GMPs for dietary supplements to build our
core standards and contract services segment. We believe that we
create value throughout the supply chain of the pharmaceutical,
dietary supplements, functional foods and personal care
markets.
In
addition, through regulatory consulting operations, we provide
product regulatory approval and scientific advisory services to our
clients in the food, supplement and pharmaceutical industries with
effective solutions to manage potential health and regulatory
risks.
We will
continue to expand our core standards and contract services
business and, more importantly, capitalize on additional
opportunities in product development and commercialization of
various kinds of intellectual property that we have largely
discovered and acquired through the sales process associated with
this segment.
Overview of our Products and Services
Current
products and services
provided are as follows:
CONSUMER PRODUCTS
●
TRU NIAGEN® branded dietary
supplements. We currently offer our NIAGEN®
nicotinamide riboside through our TRU NIAGEN® finished
bottles. We will continue to build our TRU NIAGEN® as a global
brand and offer TRU NIAGEN® to consumers worldwide. We are
conducting additional clinical trials to validate the health
benefits associated with NIAGEN® and TRU
NIAGEN®.
INGREDIENTS
●
Nicotinamide riboside NIAGEN®. We
will continue to sell NIAGEN® in ingredient form to three
remaining customers that we have supply contracts
with.
●
Pterostilbene pTeroPure®.
Pterostilbene is a polyphenol and a powerful antioxidant that shows
promise in a range of health-related fields. We have exclusive
in-licensed patents and patents pending related to the use of
pterostilbene for a number of these benefits, and have filed
additional patents related to supplementary benefits, such as a
patent jointly filed with University of California at Irvine
related to its effects on non-melanoma skin cancer. We have
successfully conducted a clinical trial, together with the
University of Mississippi, related to its blood pressure lowering
effects.
●
Pterostilbene and caffeine co-crystal
PURENERGY®. We are working to validate the benefits of
the co-crystal ingredient comprised of caffeine and pterostilbene.
The first human study of this ingredient demonstrated that it
delivers 30 percent more caffeine, stays in the blood stream
longer, and is absorbed more slowly than ordinary caffeine. With
this ingredient, formulators of energy products may have the
ability to reduce the total amount of caffeine in their products by
as much as 50% without sacrificing consumers’ expectations
from such products.
●
Anthocyanin AnthOrigin™. We plan
to develop an extraction process to concentrate the anthocyanins in
Suntava® Purple Corn which will be used to produce a
concentrated anthocyanin ingredient. We will utilize the expertise
of a toll manufacturer to produce the commercial ingredient. We
believe there is a ready market for cost-effective concentrated
anthocyanins having application in dietary supplements, sports
nutrition, food and beverage and skin care.
●
Spirulina Extract
Immulina™. IMMULINA™ is a spirulina
extract and the predominant active compounds are Braun-type
lipoproteins which are useful for improving human immune function.
These lipoproteins are present at much greater levels than those
found within commonly used immune enhancing botanicals such as
Echinacea and ginseng.
CORE STANDARDS AND CONTRACT SERVICES
●
Supply of reference standards,
materials & kits. We supply a wide range of
products necessary to conduct quality control of raw materials and
consumer products. Reference standards and materials and the kits
created from them are used for research and quality control in the
dietary supplements, cosmetics, food and beverages, and
pharmaceutical industries.
●
Supply of fine chemicals and
phytochemicals. As demand for new natural products and
phytochemicals increases, we can scale up and supply our core
products in the gram to kilogram scale for companies that require
these products for research and new product
development.
●
Consulting services. We provide a
comprehensive range of consulting services in the areas of
regulatory support, new ingredient or product development, risk
management and litigation support. We provide and offer product
regulatory approval and scientific advisory services.
●
Process development. Developing cost
effective and efficient processes for manufacturing natural
products can be very difficult and time consuming. We assist
customers in creating processes for cost-effective manufacturing of
natural products, using “green chemistry.”
●
Phytochemical
libraries. We intend to
continue investing in the development of natural product based
libraries by continuing to create these libraries internally as
well as through product licensing.
Sales and Marketing Strategy
For our
consumer products segment, we employ a variety of strategies to
drive sales and consumer awareness of TRU NIAGEN®, including
social media and internet advertising, managing websites,
influencers, paid search, distribution of research publications and
press releases.
For our
ingredients segment and core standards and contract services
segment, our strategy is based on a direct, technically-oriented
model. We recruit and hire sales and marketing staff with
appropriate commercial and scientific backgrounds. Our sales staff
performs sales duties by using combinations of telemarketing,
e-mail, tradeshows and customer visits. The inside sales portion of
the organization also has customer service responsibilities. All
sales and marking staff are compensated based on salary and
performance-based bonus. Our regulatory consulting operations,
generates scientific and regulatory consulting revenue from an
existing well-established list of Fortune 1000 customers and
referrals.
USA and Canada:
For our
consumer products segment, we are distributing our TRU NIAGEN®
products direct to consumers through our propriety ecommerce
platform TRUNIAGEN.com, Amazon Prime and Amazon marketplace.
Currently and for the near-term, we do not plan to sell TRU
NIAGEN® to brick and mortar retailers in the US and
Canada.
For our
ingredients segment and core standards and contract services
segment, we intend to
continue to use a direct marketing approach in the U.S. and Canada
to promote our products and services.
International:
For our
consumer products segment, we will be utilizing strategic partners
on a regional or local country basis to expand our distribution of
TRU NIAGEN® products. Our strategic partnerships could include
brick and mortar and/or ecommerce channels. We also are evaluating
strategic joint ventures to rapidly expand our distribution in
regions like Asia. We began our international expansion of TRU
NIAGEN® products with the successful launch in Hong Kong and
Macau with our strategic partner, Customer G, in the third quarter
of 2017, followed by the launch in Singapore in the first quarter
of 2018.
For our
ingredients segment, most of our customers are based currently in
U.S. We are looking to expand into international markets through
our international business partners.
For our
core standards contract services segment, we use international distributors
to market and sell to several foreign countries or markets. The use
of distributors in some international markets has proven to be more
effective than direct sales.
For our
regulatory consulting operations, we engage on consulting projects
for customers all over the world, including Europe, South America,
and Asia. Consulting revenues are generated from an existing
well-established list of Fortune 1000 customers and
referrals.
Government Regulation
Some of
our operations are subject to regulation by various United States
federal agencies and similar state and international agencies,
including the FDA, the Federal Trade Commission
(“FTC”), the Department of Commerce, the Department of
Transportation, the Department of Agriculture and other state and
international agencies. These regulators govern a wide variety of
production activities, from design and development to labeling,
manufacturing, handling, selling and distributing of products. From
time to time, federal, state and international legislation is
enacted that may have the effect of materially increasing the cost
of doing business or limiting or expanding our permissible
activities. We cannot predict whether or when potential legislation
or regulations will be enacted, and, if enacted, the effect of such
legislation, regulation, implementation, or any implemented
regulations or supervisory policies would have on our financial
condition or results of operations. In addition, the outcome of any
litigation, investigations or enforcement actions initiated by
state or federal authorities could result in changes to our
operations being necessary and in increased compliance
costs.
U.S. FDA Regulation
In the
United States dietary supplements and food are subject to FDA
regulations. For example, the FDA’s final rule on GMPs for
dietary supplements published in June 2007 requires companies to
evaluate products for identity, strength, purity and composition.
These regulations in some cases, particularly for new ingredients,
require a notification that must be submitted to the FDA along with
evidence of safety. In addition, depending on the type of product,
whether a dietary supplement, cosmetic, food, or pharmaceutical,
the FDA, under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or (the "FDCA"),
can regulate:
●
product
testing;
●
ingredient
testing;
●
documentation
process, batch records, specifications;
●
product
labeling;
●
product
manufacturing and storage;
●
NDI
status;
●
health claims,
advertising and promotion; and
●
product sales and
distribution.
The
FDCA has been amended several times with respect to dietary
supplements, most notably by the Dietary Supplement Health and
Education Act of 1994 (“DSHEA”). DSHEA established a
new framework for governing the composition and labeling of dietary
supplements. Generally, under DSHEA, dietary ingredients that were
marketed in the United States before October 15, 1994 may be
used in dietary supplements without notifying the FDA. However, and
NDI (a dietary ingredient that was not marketed in the United
States before October 15, 1994) is subject to NDI notification
that must be submitted to the FDA unless the ingredient has
previously been “present in the food supply as an article
used for food” without being “chemically
altered.” An NDI notification must provide the FDA with
evidence of a “history of use or other evidence of
safety” establishing that the use of the dietary ingredient
“will reasonably be expected to be safe.” An NDI
notification must be submitted to the FDA at least 75 days before
the initial marketing of the NDI. There can be no assurance that
the FDA will accept the evidence of safety for any NDIs that we may
want to commercialize, and the FDA’s refusal to accept such
evidence could prevent the marketing of such dietary ingredients.
The FDA is in the process of developing guidance for the industry
that will aim to clarify the FDA’s interpretation of the NDI
notification requirements, and this guidance may raise new and
significant regulatory barriers for NDIs.
For any
new ingredient developed by us to be used in conventional food or
beverage products in the United States, the product either must be
approved by the FDA as a food additive pursuant to a food additive
petition ("FAP") or be generally recognized as safe ("GRAS"). The
FDA does not have to approve a company’s determination that
an ingredient is GRAS. However, a company can notify the FDA of its
determination. There can be no assurance that the FDA will approve
any FAP for any ingredient that we may want to commercialize, or
agree with our determination that an ingredient is GRAS, either of
which could prevent the marketing of such ingredient.
U.S. Advertising Regulations
In
addition to FDA regulations, the FTC regulates the advertising of
dietary supplements, foods, cosmetics, and over-the-counter
("OTC"), drugs. In recent years, the FTC has instituted numerous
enforcement actions against dietary supplement companies for
failure to adequately substantiate claims made in advertising or
for the use of false or misleading advertising claims. These
enforcement actions have often resulted in consent decrees and the
payment of civil penalties, restitution, or both, by the companies
involved. We may be subject to regulation under various state and
local laws that include provisions governing, among other things,
the formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, advertising
and distribution of dietary supplements, foods, cosmetics and OTC
drugs.
In
addition, The National Advertising Division of the Council of
Better Business Bureaus reviews national advertising for
truthfulness and accuracy. The National Advertising Division of the
Council of Better Business Bureaus uses a form of alternative
dispute resolution, working closely with in-house counsel,
marketing executives, research and development departments and
outside consultants to decide whether claims have been
substantiated.
International Regulations
Our
international sales for the consumer products segment and
ingredients segment are subject to foreign government regulations,
which vary substantially from country to country. The time required
to obtain approval by a foreign country may be longer or shorter
than that required for FDA approval, and the requirements may
differ. In addition, the export by us of certain of our products
that have not yet been cleared or approved for domestic
distribution may be subject to FDA export restrictions. We may be
unable to obtain on a timely basis, if at all, any foreign
government or United States export approvals necessary for the
marketing of our products abroad.
Regulation
in Europe is exercised primarily through the European Union, which
regulates the combined market of each of its member states. Other
countries, such as Switzerland, have voluntarily adopted laws and
regulations that mirror those of the European Union with respect to
dietary ingredients.
Major Customers
Major
customers who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s
total sales from continuing operations were as
follows:
|
Years
Ended
|
||
Major
Customers
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
G - Related Party
|
19.4%
|
*
|
*
|
Customer
D
|
10.2%
|
11.0%
|
*
|
Customer
C
|
*
|
23.9%
|
*
|
Customer
B
|
*
|
*
|
13.6%
|
|
|
|
|
*
Represents less than 10%.
|
|
|
|
Generally,
we do not depend upon a single customer, or a few customers, and
the loss of any one or more would not have a material adverse
effect on the Company. However, due to the volume of consumer
products and ingredients we are selling in relation to the overall
Company’s sales, we do expect that a few of our customers at
times may account for more than 10% of the Company’s
sales.
Competitive Business Conditions
For our
consumer products segment, we are in direct competition with some
of our former and current ingredients segment customers that use
NIAGEN® in the products. We will face reduced competition in
the near term as we have reduced the number of NIAGEN®
ingredient supply agreements to three as of March
2018.
For our
ingredients segment, we face little direct competition as the
ingredients we offer, such as NIAGEN® and pTeroPure® are
backed by intellectual properties exclusively licensed to us. We,
however, face strong indirect competition from other ingredient
suppliers who may supply alternative ingredients that may have
similar characteristics compared to the ingredients we offer. Below
is a list of some of the competitors for our ingredients
segment.
Ingredients Business Segment Competitors
●
Royal DSM (the
Netherlands)
●
Glanbia plc
(Ireland)
●
BASF
(Germany)
●
Lonza Group Ltd
(Switzerland)
●
Sabinsa Corporation
(India/USA)
For the
core standards and contract services segment, we face competition
within the standardization and quality testing niche of the natural
products market. Below is a current list of certain competitors.
These competitors have already developed reference standards or
contract services or are currently taking steps to develop
botanical standards or contract services. Of the competitors
listed, some currently sell fine chemicals, which, by default, are
sometimes used as reference standards, and others are closely
aligned with our market niche to reduce any barriers to entry if
these companies wish to compete.
Core Standards and Contract Services Segment
Competitors
●
Sigma-Aldrich
(USA)
●
Phytolab
(Germany)
●
US Pharmacopoeia
(USA)
●
Extrasynthese
(France)
For
regulatory consulting operations, there are numerous competitors,
including some that are much larger companies with more resources.
The success in winning and retaining clients is heavily dependent
on the efforts and reputation of our consultants. We believe the
barriers to entry areas of our consulting expertise are
low.
Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises, Concessions, Royalty
Agreements or Labor Contracts, Including Duration
We
currently protect our intellectual property through patents,
trademarks, designs and copyrights on our products and services.
Our business strategy is to use the intellectual property harnessed
from our core standards and contract services segment as the basis
for providing new proprietary ingredients to our customers. Our
strategy is to develop these proprietary ingredients on our own as
well as to license our intellectual property to companies who will
commercialize it. We anticipate that the net result will be a
long-term flow of intellectual property milestone and royalty
payments to us.
The
following table sets forth our existing patents and those to which
we have licensed rights:
Patent Number
|
Title
|
Filing Date
|
Issued Date
|
Expires
|
Licensor
|
6,852,342
|
Compounds
for altering food intake in humans
|
3/26/2002
|
2/8/2005
|
2/12/2022
|
Co-owned
by Avoca, Inc. and ChromaDex
|
7,205,284
|
Potent
immunostimulants from microalgae
|
7/10/2001
|
4/17/2007
|
3/9/2022
|
Licensed
from University of Mississippi
|
7,776,326
|
Methods
and compositions for treating neuropathies
|
6/3/2005
|
8/17/2010
|
6/3/2025
|
Licensed
from Washington University
|
7,846,452
|
Potent
immunostimulatory extracts from microalgae
|
7/28/2005
|
10/7/2010
|
7/28/2025
|
Licensed
from University of Mississippi
|
8,106,184
|
Nicotinyl
Riboside Compositions and Methods of Use
|
11/17/2006
|
1/31/2012
|
11/17/2026
|
Licensed
from Cornell University
|
8,114,626
|
Yeast
strain and method for using the same to produce Nicotinamide
Riboside
|
3/26/2009
|
2/14/2012
|
3/26/2029
|
Licensed
from Dartmouth College
|
8,133,917
|
Pterostilbene
as an agonist for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
alpha isoform
|
10/25/2010
|
3/13/2012
|
10/25/2030
|
Licensed
from the University of Mississippi and U.S. Department of
Agriculture
|
8,197,807
|
Nicotinamide
Riboside Kinase compositions and Methods for using the
same
|
11/20/2007
|
6/12/2012
|
11/20/2027
|
Licensed
from Dartmouth College
|
8,227,510
|
Combine
use of pterostilbene and quercetin to produce cancer treatment
medicaments
|
7/19/2005
|
7/24/2012
|
7/19/2025
|
Licensed
from Green Molecular S.L.
|
8,252,845
|
Pterostilbene
as an agonist for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
alpha isoform
|
2/1/2012
|
8/28/2012
|
2/1/2032
|
Licensed
from the University of Mississippi and U.S. Department of
Agriculture
|
8,318,807
|
Pterostilbene
Caffeine Co-Crystal Forms
|
7/30/2010
|
11/27/2012
|
7/30/2030
|
Licensed
from Laurus Labs Private Limited
|
8,383,086
|
Nicotinamide
Riboside Kinase compositions and Methods for using the
same
|
4/12/2012
|
2/26/2013
|
4/12/2032
|
Licensed
from Dartmouth College
|
8,399,712
|
Pterostilbene
cocrystals
|
7/30/2010
|
3/19/2013
|
7/30/2020
|
Licensed
from Laurus Labs Private Limited
|
8,524,782
|
Key
intermediate for the preparation of Stilbenes, solid forms of
Pterostilbene, and methods for making the same
|
6/1/2009
|
9/3/2013
|
6/1/2029
|
Licensed
from Laurus Labs Private Limited
|
8,809,400
|
Method
to Ameliorate Oxidative Stress and Improve Working Memory Via
Pterostilbene Administration
|
6/10/2008
|
8/19/2014
|
6/10/2028
|
Licensed
from the University of Mississippi and U.S. Department of
Agriculture
|
8,841,350
|
Method
for treating non-melanoma skin cancer by inducing
UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase activity using
pterostilbene
|
5/8/2012
|
9/22/2014
|
5/8/2032
|
Co-owned
by ChromaDex and University of California
|
8,945,653
|
Extracted
whole kernels and improved processed and processable corn produced
thereby
|
5/23/2011
|
2/3/2015
|
5/23/2031
|
Licensed
from Suntava, LLC
|
9,028,887
|
Method
improve spatial memory via pterostilbene
administration
|
5/22/2014
|
5/12/2015
|
5/22/2034
|
Licensed
from the University of Mississippi and U.S. Department of
Agriculture
|
9,439,875
|
Anxiolytic
effect of pterostilbene
|
5/11/2011
|
9/13/2016
|
5/11/2031
|
Licensed
from the University of Mississippi and U.S. Department of
Agriculture
|
Manufacturing
We
currently utilize third-party manufacturers to produce and supply
the dietary supplements, ingredients, products, and services.
Following the receipt of products or product components from
third-party manufacturers, we currently inspect products, as
needed. We expect to reserve the right to inspect and ensure
conformance of each product and product component to our
specifications. We will also consider manufacturing certain
products or product components internally, if our capacity permits,
when demand or quality requirements make it appropriate to do
so.
We
intend to work with manufacturing companies that can meet the
standards imposed by the FDA, the International Organization for
Standardization and the quality standards that we will require for
our own internal policies and procedures. We expect to monitor and
manage supplier performance through a corrective action program
developed by us. We believe these manufacturing relationships can
minimize our capital investment, help control costs, and allow us
to compete with larger volume manufacturers of dietary supplements,
phytochemicals and ingredients.
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials
For all
three business segments, we believe that we have identified
reliable sources and suppliers of ingredients, chemicals,
phytochemicals and reference materials that will provide products
in compliance with our guidelines.
Research and Development
We have
completed the first human clinical trial on our proprietary
ingredient NR and the results demonstrated that a single dose of NR
resulted in statistically significant increases in the co-enzyme
NAD+ in healthy human volunteers. In addition, NR was also found to
be safe as no adverse events were observed. In 2015, NR was recognized by the
FDA as a “New Dietary Ingredient.” NR was also
“Generally Recognized as Safe” by an independent panel
of expert toxicologists and in August 2016, the FDA issued a GRAS
No Objection Letter.
We are
currently completing a second human clinical trial on NR which
evaluated the effect of repeated doses of NIAGEN® on NAD+
metabolite concentrations in blood, urine and muscle in healthy
adults. This study evaluated the impacts of three dose levels of
NIAGEN® compared to a placebo. One quarter of subjects
received the low dose of NIAGEN® (100 mg), one quarter
received the moderate dose of NIAGEN® (300 mg), one quarter
received the higher dose of NIAGEN® (1,000 mg) and one quarter
received the placebo. Preliminary results show that NAD levels rose
in response to the dose of NIAGEN® and the elevated blood NAD
levels were sustained throughout the 8-week treatment
period.
We have
also been working closely with the National Institute of Health
under a collaborative agreement on a therapeutic indication for NR
as a treatment of Cockayne Syndrome, a rare pediatric orphan
disease.
Through
our research and development laboratory in Longmont, Colorado, we
intend to manufacture at a process scale for products that we are
planning to take to market as well as explore cost saving processes
for existing products.
We plan
to utilize our expertise in natural products to license and develop
new intellectual property that can be sold to clients in our target
industries.
Research
and development costs for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2017,
December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 were approximately $4.0
million, $2.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Please refer
to Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for research and development costs for
each of the business segments for the last three fiscal
years.
Environmental Compliance
We will
incur significant expense in complying with GMPs and safe handling
and disposal of materials used in our research and manufacturing
activities. We do not anticipate incurring additional material
expense to comply with federal, state and local environmental laws
and regulations.
Working Capital
The
Company’s working capital at the end of years 2017 and 2016
was approximately $7.4 million and $7.8 million, respectively. The
Company measures working capital by adding trade receivables and
inventories, and subtracting accounts payable. Most of the working
capital is consumed by our consumer products segment and
ingredients segment as the operations require a large amount of
inventory to be on hand. As the consumer products segment and
ingredients segment grow, more working capital will likely be
needed to support the operations.
Backlog Orders
For our
consumer products segment where we ship products internationally to
a distributor, we may have a backlog from time to time as the
production of TRU NIAGEN® finished bottles require up to three
months lead time by our third-party contract manufacturers. As of
December 30, 2017, we did not have any backlog orders from the
distributor as all orders received have been shipped. For products
that are directly shipped to consumers, we have minimal backlog
orders as we carry inventory on hand to ship upon the receipt of
order.
For our
ingredients segment, we also have minimal backlog orders as we
carry inventory on hand for most of the products we offer and we
ship upon the receipt of customer’s order.
For our
core standards and contract services segment, we normally have a
small backlog of orders for reference standards. These orders
amount to approximately $25,000 or less. Because we list over 1,800
phytochemicals and 400 botanical reference materials in our
catalog, we may not always have the items in stock at the time of
customers’ orders. These backlog orders are normally
fulfilled within 2 to 3 months.
Facilities
For
information on our facilities, see “Properties” in Item
2 of this Form 10-K.
Employees
As of
December 30, 2017, ChromaDex (including Healthspan Research LLC and
ChromaDex Analytics, Inc.) had 74 employees, 71 of whom were
full-time and three of whom were part-time. We consider our
relationships with our employees to be satisfactory. None of our
employees is covered by a collective bargaining
agreement.
Financial Information about Geographic Areas
Please
refer to Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for financial information about
geographic areas.
Available Information
Our Internet website address is www.chromadex.com. We
make available free of charge on our website our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current
Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or
furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practical
after we file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities
and Exchange Commission, or SEC. This information is also available
in print to any shareholder who requests it, with any such requests
addressed to ChromaDex Corporation, 10005 Muirlands Blvd. Ste G,
Irvine, CA 92618. Certain of these documents may also be obtained
by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an
Internet website that contains reports, and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC
at www.sec.gov. We
also make available free of charge on our website our Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics, and the Charters of our Audit
Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and
Compensation Committee of our Board of
Directors.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
Current investors and potential investors should consider carefully
the risks and uncertainties described below together with all other
information contained in this Form 10-K before making investment
decisions with respect to our common stock. If any of the following
risks occurs, our business, financial condition, results of
operations and our future growth prospects would be materially and
adversely affected. Under these circumstances, the trading price
and value of our common stock could decline, resulting in a loss of
all or part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties
described in this Form 10-K are not the only ones facing our
Company. Additional risks and uncertainties of which we are not
presently aware, or that we currently consider immaterial, may also
affect our business operations.
Risks Related to our Company and our Business
We have a history of operating losses, may need additional
financing to meet our future long-term capital requirements and may
be unable to raise sufficient capital on favorable terms or at
all.
We have
a history of losses and may continue to incur operating and net
losses for the foreseeable future. We incurred net losses of
approximately $11.4 million, $2.9 million and $2.8 million for the
years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2,
2016, respectively. As of December 30, 2017, our accumulated
deficit was approximately $56.6 million. We have not achieved
profitability on an annual basis. We may not be able to reach a
level of revenue to continue to achieve and sustain profitability.
If our revenues grow slower than anticipated, or if operating
expenses exceed expectations, then we may not be able to achieve
and sustain profitability in the near future or at all, which may
depress our stock price.
As of
December 30, 2017, our cash and cash equivalents totaled
approximately $45.4 million. While we anticipate that our current
cash, cash equivalents and cash to be generated from operations
will be sufficient to meet our projected operating plans into 2019,
we may require additional funds, either through additional equity
or debt financings or collaborative agreements or from other
sources. We have no commitments to obtain such additional
financing, and we may not be able to obtain any such additional
financing on terms favorable to us, or at all. If adequate
financing is not available, the Company will further delay,
postpone or terminate product and service expansion and curtail
certain selling, general and administrative operations. The
inability to raise additional financing may have a material adverse
effect on the future performance of the Company.
Our capital requirements will depend on many factors.
Our
capital requirements will depend on many factors,
including:
●
the
revenues generated by sales of our products;
●
the
costs associated with expanding our sales and marketing efforts,
including efforts to hire independent agents and sales
representatives and obtain required regulatory approvals and
clearances;
●
the
expenses we incur in developing and commercializing our products,
including the cost of obtaining and maintaining regulatory
approvals; and
●
unanticipated
general and administrative expenses, including expenses involved
with our ongoing litigation with Elysium.
Because
of these factors, we may seek to raise additional capital prior to
March 2019 both to meet our projected operating plans after March
2019 and to fund our longer term strategic objectives. Additional
capital may come from public and private equity or debt offerings,
borrowings under lines of credit or other sources. These additional
funds may not be available on favorable terms, or at all. There can
be no assurance we will be successful in raising these additional
funds. Furthermore, if we issue equity or debt securities to raise
additional funds, our existing stockholders may experience dilution
and the new equity or debt securities we issue may have rights,
preferences and privileges senior to those of our existing
stockholders. In addition, if we raise additional funds through
collaboration, licensing or other similar arrangements, it may be
necessary to relinquish valuable rights to our products or
proprietary technologies, or grant licenses on terms that are not
favorable to us. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms, we
may not be able to develop or enhance our products, obtain the
required regulatory clearances or approvals, execute our business
plan, take advantage of future opportunities, or respond to
competitive pressures or unanticipated customer requirements. Any
of these events could adversely affect our ability to achieve our
development and commercialization goals, which could have a
material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
We are currently engaged in substantial and complex litigation with
Elysium Health, Inc. and Elysium Health LLC
(“Elysium”), the outcome of which could materially harm
our business and financial results.
We are currently engaged in litigation with Elysium, a customer
that represented 19% of our net sales for the year
ended December 31, 2016. Elysium has made no purchases
from us since August 9, 2016. The litigation includes multiple
complaints and counterclaims by us and Elysium in venues in
California and New York, as well as a petition by Elysium with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for inter partes review of one
patent to which we are the exclusive licensee. For further details
on this litigation, please refer to Part I, Item 3 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
The litigation is substantial and complex, and it has and
could continue to cause us to incur significant costs, as well as
distract our management over an extended period. The litigation may
substantially disrupt our business and we cannot assure you that we
will be able to resolve the litigation on terms favorable to us.
If we are unsuccessful in resolving
the litigation on favorable terms to us, we may be forced to pay
compensatory and punitive damages and restitution for any royalty
payments that we received from Elysium, which payments could
materially harm our business, or be subject to other remedies,
including injunctive relief. Further, if we are unsuccessful in
resolving the Patent Claim on favorable terms, or if the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office invalidates the patent subject to the
inter partes review, we may lose the competitive advantage that is
provided by the subject intellectual property rights, which would
have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition,
Elysium has not paid us approximately $2.7 million for previous
purchase orders. We may not collect the full amount owed to us by
Elysium, and as a result, we may have to write off a large portion
of that amount as uncollectible expense. We cannot predict the
outcome of our litigation with Elysium, which could have any of the
results described above or other results that could materially harm
our business.
Interruptions in our relationships or declines in our business with
major customers could materially ham our business and financial
results.
Two of our customers accounted for approximately 30% of our sales
during the year ended December 30, 2017. Any interruption in our
relationship or decline in our business with these customers or
other customers upon whom we become highly dependent could cause
harm to our business. Factors that could influence our relationship
with our customers upon whom we may become highly dependent
include:
●
our
ability to maintain our products at prices that are competitive
with those of our competitors;
●
our
ability to maintain quality levels for our products sufficient to
meet the expectations of our customers;
●
our
ability to produce, ship and deliver a sufficient quantity of our
products in a timely manner to meet the needs of our
customers;
●
our
ability to continue to develop and launch new products that our
customers feel meet their needs and requirements, with respect to
cost, timeliness, features, performance and other
factors;
●
our
ability to provide timely, responsive and accurate customer support
to our customers; and
●
the
ability of our customers to effectively deliver, market and
increase sales of their own products based on ours.
In an effort to promote and better market our consumer products, we
have made a strategic decision to not ship NIAGEN® to certain
ingredient segment customers, which could potentially harm our
overall sales.
By
developing and selling TRU NIAGEN®, our own consumer standalone
NIAGEN® supplement product, we are in direct competition with
some of our current ingredients segment customers that use
NIAGEN® in the products that are sold to consumers. In an
effort to promote and better market our consumer product, we have
made a strategic decision not to ship NIAGEN® to certain
ingredients segment customers, which will have a negative effect on
our ingredient segment sales. For example, sales for our
ingredients segment for the year ended December 30, 2017 decreased
34% compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. Additionally, as
our own consumer product becomes more prominent and widely adopted
by consumers, the competition with our consumer product could
potentially further harm the sales of our ingredients segment
business, and our sales of NIAGEN® for our ingredients segment
may further decrease. The sales of our consumer product may not
outweigh the decrease in sales of our ingredients segment, which
would lead to an overall decrease in our sales. Sales for our
ingredients segment represented approximately 53% of the
Company’s revenue for 2017, and sales of NIAGEN®
accounted for approximately 70% of our ingredient segment’s
total sales in 2017, or 37% of our overall revenue, so any harm to
our NIAGEN® ingredient sales, if not compensated for by sales
of our consumer product, may materially and negatively affect our
business.
Our future success largely depends on sales of our TRU
NIAGEN®
product.
In
connection with our strategic shift from an ingredient and testing
company to a consumer focused company, we expect to generate a
significant percentage of our future revenue from sales of our TRU
NIAGEN® product. As a result, the market acceptance of TRU
NIAGEN® is critical to our continued success, and if we are
unable to expand market acceptance of TRU NIAGEN®, our
business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and
growth prospects would be adversely affected.
Decline in the state of the global
economy and financial market conditions could adversely affect our
ability to conduct business and our results of
operations.
Global
economic and financial market conditions, including disruptions in
the credit markets and the impact of the global economic
deterioration may materially impact our customers and other parties
with whom we do business. These conditions could negatively affect
our future sales of our ingredient lines as many consumers consider
the purchase of nutritional products discretionary. Decline in
general economic and financial market conditions could materially
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Specifically, the impact of these volatile and negative conditions
may include decreased demand for our products and services, a
decrease in our ability to accurately forecast future product
trends and demand, and a negative impact on our ability to timely
collect receivables from our customers. The foregoing economic
conditions may lead to increased levels of bankruptcies,
restructurings and liquidations for our customers, scaling back of
research and development expenditures, delays in planned projects
and shifts in business strategies for many of our customers. Such
events could, in turn, adversely affect our business through loss
of sales.
We may need to increase the size of our organization, and we can
provide no assurance that we will successfully expand operations or
manage growth effectively.
Our
significant increase in the scope and the scale of our product
launches, including the hiring of additional personnel, has
resulted in significantly higher operating expenses. As a result,
we anticipate that our operating expenses will continue to
increase. Expansion of our operations may also cause a significant
demand on our management, finances and other resources. Our ability
to manage the anticipated future growth, should it occur, will
depend upon a significant expansion of our accounting and other
internal management systems and the implementation and subsequent
improvement of a variety of systems, procedures and controls. There
can be no assurance that significant problems in these areas will
not occur. Any failure to expand these areas and implement and
improve such systems, procedures and controls in an efficient
manner at a pace consistent with our business could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. There can be no assurance that our attempts to expand
our marketing, sales, manufacturing and customer support efforts
will be successful or will result in additional sales or
profitability in any future period. As a result of the expansion of
our operations and the anticipated increase in our operating
expenses, as well as the difficulty in forecasting revenue levels,
we expect to continue to experience significant fluctuations in our
results of operations.
Changes in our business strategy, including entering the consumer
product market, or restructuring of our businesses may increase our
costs or otherwise affect the profitability of our
businesses.
As
changes in our business environment occur we may adjust our
business strategies to meet these changes or we may otherwise
decide to restructure our operations or businesses or assets. In
addition, external events including changing technology, changing
consumer patterns and changes in macroeconomic conditions may
impair the value of our assets. When these changes or events occur,
we may incur costs to change our business strategy and may need to
write down the value of assets. In any of these events, our costs
may increase, we may have significant charges associated with the
write-down of assets or returns on new investments may be lower
than prior to the change in strategy or restructuring. For example,
if we are not successful in developing our consumer product
business, our sales may decrease and our costs may
increase.
The success of our consumer product and ingredient business
is linked to the size and growth rate of the vitamin, mineral and
dietary supplement market and an adverse change in the size or
growth rate of that market could have a material adverse effect on
us.
An
adverse change in the size or growth rate of the vitamin, mineral
and dietary supplement market could have a material adverse effect
on our business. Underlying market conditions are subject to change
based on economic conditions, consumer preferences and other
factors that are beyond our control, including media attention and
scientific research, which may be positive or
negative.
Our future growth and profitability of our consumer product
business will depend in large part upon the effectiveness and
efficiency of our marketing efforts and our ability to select
effective markets and media in which to advertise.
Our consumer products business success depends on our ability to
attract and retain customers, which significantly depends on our
marketing practices. Our future growth and profitability will
depend in large part upon the effectiveness and efficiency of our
marketing efforts, including our ability to:
●
create greater awareness of our brand;
●
identify the most effective and efficient levels of spending in
each market, media and specific media vehicle;
●
determine the appropriate creative messages and media mix for
advertising, marketing and promotional expenditures;
●
effectively manage marketing costs (including creative and media)
to maintain acceptable customer acquisition costs;
●
acquire cost-effective television advertising;
●
select the most effective markets, media and specific media
vehicles in which to advertise; and
●
convert consumer inquiries into actual orders.
Unfavorable publicity or consumer perception of our products and
any similar products distributed by other companies could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
We
believe the nutritional supplement market is highly dependent upon
consumer perception regarding the safety, efficacy and quality of
nutritional supplements generally, as well as of products
distributed specifically by us. Consumer perception of our products
can be significantly influenced by scientific research or findings,
regulatory investigations, litigation, national media attention and
other publicity regarding the consumption of nutritional
supplements. We cannot assure you that future scientific research,
findings, regulatory proceedings, litigation, media attention or
other favorable research findings or publicity will be favorable to
the nutritional supplement market or any product, or consistent
with earlier publicity. Future research reports, findings,
regulatory proceedings, litigation, media attention or other
publicity that are perceived as less favorable than, or that
question, such earlier research reports, findings or publicity
could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products
and consequently on our business, results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.
Our
dependence upon consumer perceptions means that adverse scientific
research reports, findings, regulatory proceedings, litigation,
media attention or other publicity, if accurate or with merit,
could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products, the
availability and pricing of our ingredients, and our business,
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Further,
adverse public reports or other media attention regarding the
safety, efficacy and quality of nutritional supplements in general,
or our products specifically, or associating the consumption of
nutritional supplements with illness, could have such a material
adverse effect. Any such adverse public reports or other
media attention could arise even if the adverse effects associated
with such products resulted from consumers’ failure to
consume such products appropriately or as directed and the content
of such public reports and other media attention may be beyond our
control.
We may incur material product
liability claims, which could increase our costs and adversely
affect our reputation, revenues and operating
income.
As a
consumer product and ingredient supplier we market and manufacture
products designed for human and animal consumption, we are subject
to product liability claims if the use of our products is alleged
to have resulted in injury. Our products consist of vitamins,
minerals, herbs and other ingredients that are classified as foods,
dietary supplements, or natural health products, and, in most
cases, are not necessarily subject to pre-market regulatory
approval in the United States. Some of our products contain
innovative ingredients that do not have long histories of human
consumption. Previously unknown adverse reactions resulting from
human consumption of these ingredients could occur. In addition,
the products we sell are produced by third-party manufacturers. As
a marketer of products manufactured by third parties, we also may
be liable for various product liability claims for products we do
not manufacture. We may, in the future, be subject to various
product liability claims, including, among others, that our
products include inadequate instructions for use or inadequate
warnings concerning possible side effects and interactions with
other substances. A product liability claim against us could result
in increased costs and could adversely affect our reputation with
our customers, which, in turn, could have a materially adverse
effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows.
We acquire a significant amount of
key ingredients for our products from foreign suppliers, and may be
negatively affected by the risks associated with international
trade and importation issues.
We
acquire a significant amount of key ingredients for a number of our
products from suppliers outside of the United States, particularly
India and China. Accordingly, the acquisition of these
ingredients is subject to the risks generally associated with
importing raw materials, including, among other factors, delays in
shipments, changes in economic and political conditions, quality
assurance, nonconformity to specifications or laws and regulations,
tariffs, trade disputes and foreign currency fluctuations. While we
have a supplier certification program and audit and inspect our
suppliers’ facilities as necessary both in the United States
and internationally, we cannot assure you that raw materials
received from suppliers outside of the United States will conform
to all specifications, laws and regulations. There have
in the past been quality and safety issues in our industry with
certain items imported from overseas. We may incur
additional expenses and experience shipment delays due to
preventative measures adopted by the Indian and U.S. governments,
our suppliers and our company.
The insurance industry has become
more selective in offering some types of coverage and we may not be
able to obtain insurance coverage in the
future.
The
insurance industry has become more selective in offering some types
of insurance, such as product liability, product recall, property
and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. Our
current insurance program is consistent with both our past level of
coverage and our risk management policies. However, we cannot
assure you that we will be able to obtain comparable insurance
coverage on favorable terms, or at all, in the
future. Certain of our customers as well as prospective
customers require that we maintain minimum levels of coverage for
our products. Lack of coverage or coverage below these minimum
required levels could cause these customers to materially change
business terms or to cease doing business with us
entirely.
If we experience product recalls, we may incur significant and
unexpected costs, and our business reputation could be adversely
affected.
We may be exposed to product recalls and adverse public relations
if our products are alleged to be mislabeled or cause injury or
illness, or if we are alleged to have violated governmental
regulations. A product recall could result in substantial and
unexpected expenditures, which would reduce operating profit and
cash flow. In addition, a product recall may require significant
management attention. Product recalls may hurt the value of our
brands and lead to decreased demand for our products. Product
recalls also may lead to increased scrutiny by federal, state or
international regulatory agencies of our operations and increased
litigation and could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows.
We depend on key personnel, the
loss of any of which could negatively affect our
business.
We
depend greatly on Frank L. Jaksch Jr., Robert N. Fried, Kevin M.
Farr, Mark J. Friedman and Troy A. Rhonemus, who are our Chief
Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, General Counsel and Executive Vice President,
respectively. We also depend greatly on other key employees,
including key scientific and marketing personnel. In general, only
highly qualified and trained scientists have the necessary skills
to develop our products and provide our services. Only marketing
personnel with specific experience and knowledge in health care are
able to effectively market our products. In addition,
some of our manufacturing, quality control, safety and compliance,
information technology, sales and e-commerce related positions are
highly technical as well. We face intense competition for these
professionals from our competitors, customers, marketing partners
and other companies throughout the industries in which we
compete. Our success will depend, in part, upon our ability to
attract and retain additional skilled personnel, which will require
substantial additional funds. There can be no assurance that we
will be able to find and attract additional qualified employees or
retain any such personnel. Our inability to hire qualified
personnel, the loss of services of our key personnel, or the loss
of services of executive officers or key employees that may be
hired in the future may have a material and adverse effect on our
business.
Our operating results may fluctuate significantly as a result of a
variety of factors, many of which are outside of our
control.
We are
subject to the following factors, among others, that may negatively
affect our operating results:
●
the
announcement or introduction of new products by our
competitors;
●
our
ability to upgrade and develop our systems and infrastructure to
accommodate growth;
●
the
decision by significant customers to reduce purchases;
●
disputes and
litigation with competitors;
●
our
ability to attract and retain key personnel in a timely and
cost-effective manner;
●
technical
difficulties;
●
the
amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures
relating to the expansion of our business, operations and
infrastructure;
●
regulation by
federal, state or local governments; and
●
general economic
conditions as well as economic conditions specific to the
healthcare industry.
As a
result of our limited operating history and the nature of the
markets in which we compete, it is extremely difficult for us to
make accurate forecasts. We have based our current and future
expense levels largely on our investment plans and estimates of
future events although certain of our expense levels are, to a
large extent, fixed. Assuming our products reach the market, we may
be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for
any unexpected revenue shortfall. Accordingly, any significant
shortfall in revenues relative to our planned expenditures would
have an immediate adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition. Further, as a strategic
response to changes in the competitive environment, we may from
time to time make certain pricing, service or marketing decisions
that could have a material and adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition. Due to the foregoing
factors, our revenues and operating results are and will remain
difficult to forecast.
We face significant competition, including changes in
pricing.
The
markets for our products and services are both competitive and
price sensitive. Many of our competitors have significant
financial, operations, sales and marketing resources and experience
in research and development. Competitors could develop new
technologies that compete with our products and services or even
render our products obsolete. If a competitor develops superior
technology or cost-effective alternatives to our products and
services, our business could be seriously harmed.
The
markets for some of our products are also subject to specific
competitive risks because these markets are highly price
competitive. Our competitors have competed in the past by lowering
prices on certain products. If they do so again, we may be forced
to respond by lowering our prices. This would reduce sales revenues
and increase losses. Failure to anticipate and respond to price
competition may also impact sales and aggravate
losses.
We
believe that customers in our markets display a significant amount
of loyalty to their supplier of a particular product. To the extent
we are not the first to develop, offer and/or supply new products,
customers may buy from our competitors or make materials
themselves, causing our competitive position to
suffer.
Many of our competitors are larger and have greater financial and
other resources than we do.
Our
products compete and will compete with other similar products
produced by our competitors. These competitive products could be
marketed by well-established, successful companies that possess
greater financial, marketing, distributional, personnel and other
resources than we possess. Using these resources, these companies
can implement extensive advertising and promotional campaigns, both
generally and in response to specific marketing efforts by
competitors, and enter into new markets more rapidly to introduce
new products. In certain instances, competitors with greater
financial resources also may be able to enter a market in direct
competition with us, offering attractive marketing tools to
encourage the sale of products that compete with our products or
present cost features that consumers may find
attractive.
We may never develop any additional products to
commercialize.
We have
invested a substantial amount of our time and resources in
developing various new products. Commercialization of these
products will require additional development, clinical evaluation,
regulatory approval, significant marketing efforts and substantial
additional investment before they can provide us with any revenue.
Despite our efforts, these products may not become commercially
successful products for a number of reasons, including but not
limited to:
●
we
may not be able to obtain regulatory approvals for our products, or
the approved indication may be narrower than we seek;
●
our
products may not prove to be safe and effective in clinical
trials;
●
we
may experience delays in our development program;
●
any
products that are approved may not be accepted in the
marketplace;
●
we
may not have adequate financial or other resources to complete the
development or to commence the commercialization of our products or
will not have adequate financial or other resources to achieve
significant commercialization of our products;
●
we
may not be able to manufacture any of our products in commercial
quantities or at an acceptable cost;
●
rapid
technological change may make our products obsolete;
●
we
may be unable to effectively protect our intellectual property
rights or we may become subject to claims that our activities have
infringed the intellectual property rights of others;
and
●
we
may be unable to obtain or defend patent rights for our
products.
We may not be able to partner with others for technological
capabilities and new products and services.
Our
ability to remain competitive may depend, in part, on our ability
to continue to seek partners that can offer technological
improvements and improve existing products and services that are
offered to our customers. We are committed to attempting to keep
pace with technological change, to stay abreast of technology
changes and to look for partners that will develop new products and
services for our customer base. We cannot assure prospective
investors that we will be successful in finding partners or be able
to continue to incorporate new developments in technology, to
improve existing products and services, or to develop successful
new products and services, nor can we be certain that newly
developed products and services will perform satisfactorily or be
widely accepted in the marketplace or that the costs involved in
these efforts will not be substantial.
If we fail to maintain adequate quality standards for our products
and services, our business may be adversely affected and our
reputation harmed.
Dietary
supplement, nutraceutical, food and beverage, functional food,
analytical laboratories, pharmaceutical and cosmetic customers are
often subject to rigorous quality standards to obtain and maintain
regulatory approval of their products and the manufacturing
processes that generate them. A failure to maintain, or, in some
instances, upgrade our quality standards to meet our
customers’ needs, could cause damage to our reputation and
potentially substantial sales losses.
Our ability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary
technology through patents and other means is uncertain and may be
inadequate, which would have a material and adverse effect on
us.
Our
success depends significantly on our ability to protect our
proprietary rights to the technologies used in our products. We
rely on patent protection, as well as a combination of copyright,
trade secret and trademark laws and nondisclosure, confidentiality
and other contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary
technology, including our licensed technology. However, these legal
means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect
our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage.
For example, our pending United States and foreign patent
applications may not issue as patents in a form that will be
advantageous to us or may issue and be subsequently successfully
challenged by others and invalidated. In addition, our pending
patent applications include claims to material aspects of our
products and procedures that are not currently protected by issued
patents. Both the patent application process and the process of
managing patent disputes can be time consuming and expensive.
Competitors may be able to design around our patents or develop
products which provide outcomes which are comparable or even
superior to ours. Steps that we have taken to protect our
intellectual property and proprietary technology, including
entering into confidentiality agreements and intellectual property
assignment agreements with some of our officers, employees,
consultants and advisors, may not provide us with meaningful
protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary information
in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or other breaches of
the agreements. Furthermore, the laws of foreign countries may not
protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do
the laws of the United States.
In the
event a competitor infringes our licensed or pending patent or
other intellectual property rights, enforcing those rights may be
costly, uncertain, difficult and time consuming. Even if
successful, litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights
or to defend our patents against challenge could be expensive and
time consuming and could divert our management’s attention.
As further described in Part I, Item 3 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, we are currently involved in patent litigation, as
Elysium is claiming that we misused certain patent rights, and has
filed a petition with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for
inter partes review of two patents to which we are the exclusive
licensee. The U.S. Patent Trial and
Appeal Board denied institution of an inter partes review for one
patent, but granted institution on an inter partes review as to
certain claims for the other patent. If we are unsuccessful
in resolving the patent misuse claim on favorable terms, or if the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office invalidates the patent still
subject to the inter partes review, we may lose the competitive
advantage that is provided by the subject intellectual property
rights, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We may not have sufficient resources to enforce our intellectual
property rights or to defend our patents rights against a
challenge. The failure to obtain patents and/or protect our
intellectual property rights could have a material and adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our patents and licenses may be subject to challenge on validity
grounds, and our patent applications may be rejected.
We rely
on our patents, patent applications, licenses and other
intellectual property rights to give us a competitive advantage.
Whether a patent is valid, or whether a patent application should
be granted, is a complex matter of science and law, and therefore
we cannot be certain that, if challenged, our patents, patent
applications and/or other intellectual property rights would be
upheld. If one or more of those patents, patent applications,
licenses and other intellectual property rights are invalidated,
rejected or found unenforceable, that could reduce or eliminate any
competitive advantage we might otherwise have had. For example, as
further described in Part I, Item 3 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K, we are currently involved in patent litigation, as Elysium is
claiming that we misused certain patent rights, and has filed a
petition with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for inter partes
review of two patents to which we are the exclusive licensee.
The U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board
denied institution of an inter partes review for one patent, but
granted institution on an inter partes review as to certain claims
for the other patent. If we are unsuccessful in resolving
the patent misuse claim on favorable terms, or if the U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office invalidates the patent subject to the inter
partes review, we may lose the competitive advantage that is
provided by the subject intellectual property rights, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business.
We may become subject to claims of infringement or misappropriation
of the intellectual property rights of others, which could prohibit
us from developing our products, require us to obtain licenses from
third parties or to develop non-infringing alternatives and subject
us to substantial monetary damages.
Third
parties could, in the future, assert infringement or
misappropriation claims against us with respect to products we
develop. Whether a product infringes a patent or misappropriates
other intellectual property involves complex legal and factual
issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. Therefore,
we cannot be certain that we have not infringed the intellectual
property rights of others. There may be third-party patents or
patent applications with claims to materials, formulations, methods
of manufacture or methods for use related to the use or manufacture
of our products, and our potential competitors may assert that some
aspect of our product infringes their patents. Because patent
applications may take years to issue, there also may be
applications now pending of which we are unaware that may later
result in issued patents upon which our products could infringe.
There also may be existing patents or pending patent applications
of which we are unaware upon which our products may inadvertently
infringe.
Any
infringement or misappropriation claim could cause us to incur
significant costs, place significant strain on our financial
resources, divert management’s attention from our business
and harm our reputation. If the relevant patents in such claim were
upheld as valid and enforceable and we were found to infringe them,
we could be prohibited from manufacturing or selling any product
that is found to infringe unless we could obtain licenses to use
the technology covered by the patent or are able to design around
the patent. We may be unable to obtain such a license on terms
acceptable to us, if at all, and we may not be able to redesign our
products to avoid infringement, which could materially impact our
revenue. A court could also order us to pay compensatory damages
for such infringement, plus prejudgment interest and could, in
addition, treble the compensatory damages and award attorney fees.
These damages could be substantial and could harm our reputation,
business, financial condition and operating results. A court also
could enter orders that temporarily, preliminarily or permanently
enjoin us and our customers from making, using, or selling
products, and could enter an order mandating that we undertake
certain remedial activities. Depending on the nature of the relief
ordered by the court, we could become liable for additional damages
to third parties.
The prosecution and enforcement of patents licensed to us by third
parties are not within our control. Without these technologies, our
products may not be successful and our business would be harmed if
the patents were infringed on or misappropriated without action by
such third parties.
We have
obtained licenses from third parties for patents and patent
application rights related to the products we are developing,
allowing us to use intellectual property rights owned by or
licensed to these third parties. We do not control the maintenance,
prosecution, enforcement or strategy for many of these patents or
patent application rights and as such are dependent in part on the
owners of the intellectual property rights to maintain their
viability. If any third party licensor is unable to successfully
maintain, prosecute or enforce the licensed patents and/or patent
application rights related to our products, we may become subject
to infringement or misappropriate claims or lose our competitive
advantage. Without access to these technologies or suitable
design-around or alternative technology options, our ability to
conduct our business could be impaired significantly. As further
described in Part I, Item 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
Elysium has filed a petition with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office for inter partes review of two patents to which we are the
exclusive licensee. The U.S. Patent
Trial and Appeal Board denied institution of an inter partes review
for one patent, but granted institution on an inter partes review
as to certain claims for the other patent. Pursuant to the
exclusive license agreement with the Trustees of Dartmouth College
(“Dartmouth”), Dartmouth controls all future
preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of the patent
subject to such inter partes review.
We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we, our
employees, or our independent contractors have wrongfully used or
disclosed alleged trade secrets of others.
Some of
our employees were previously employed at other dietary supplement,
nutraceutical, food and beverage, functional food, analytical
laboratories, pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies. We may also
hire additional employees who are currently employed at other such
companies, including our competitors. Additionally, consultants or
other independent agents with which we may contract may be or have
been in a contractual arrangement with one or more of our
competitors. We may be subject to claims that these employees or
independent contractors have used or disclosed such other
party’s trade secrets or other proprietary information.
Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if
we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation
could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to our
management. If we fail to defend such claims, in addition to paying
monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights
or personnel. A loss of key personnel or their work product could
hamper or prevent our ability to market existing or new products,
which could severely harm our business.
Litigation may harm our business.
Substantial,
complex or extended litigation could cause us to incur significant
costs and distract our management. For example, lawsuits by
employees, stockholders, collaborators, distributors, customers,
competitors or others could be very costly and substantially
disrupt our business. Disputes from time to time with such
companies, organizations or individuals are not uncommon, and we
cannot assure you that we will always be able to resolve such
disputes or on terms favorable to us. As further described in Part
I, Item 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are currently
involved in substantial and complex litigation with Elysium.
Unexpected results could cause us to have financial exposure in
these matters in excess of recorded reserves and insurance
coverage, requiring us to provide additional reserves to address
these liabilities, therefore impacting profits.
Our sales and results of operations for our core standards and
contract services segment depend on our customers’ research
and development efforts and their ability to obtain funding for
these efforts.
Our
core standards and contract services segment customers include
researchers at pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, chemical
and related companies, academic institutions, government
laboratories and private foundations. Fluctuations in the research
and development budgets of these researchers and their
organizations could have a significant effect on the demand for our
products. Our customers determine their research and development
budgets based on several factors, including the need to develop new
products, the availability of governmental and other funding,
competition and the general availability of resources. As we
continue to expand our international operations, we expect research
and development spending levels in markets outside of the United
States will become increasingly important to us.
Research
and development budgets fluctuate due to changes in available
resources, spending priorities, general economic conditions,
institutional and governmental budgetary limitations and mergers of
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Our business could be
harmed by any significant decrease in life science and high
technology research and development expenditures by our customers.
In particular, a small portion of our sales has been to researchers
whose funding is dependent on grants from government agencies such
as the United States National Institute of Health, the National
Science Foundation, the National Cancer Institute and similar
agencies or organizations. Government funding of research and
development is subject to the political process, which is often
unpredictable. Other departments, such as Homeland Security or
Defense, or general efforts to reduce the United States federal
budget deficit could be viewed by the government as a higher
priority. Any shift away from funding of life science and high
technology research and development or delays surrounding the
approval of governmental budget proposals may cause our customers
to delay or forego purchases of our products and services, which
could seriously damage our business.
Some of
our customers receive funds from approved grants at a particular
time of year, many times set by government budget cycles. In the
past, such grants have been frozen for extended periods or have
otherwise become unavailable to various institutions without
notice. The timing of the receipt of grant funds may affect the
timing of purchase decisions by our customers and, as a result,
cause fluctuations in our sales and operating results.
Demand for our products and services are subject to the commercial
success of our customers’ products, which may vary for
reasons outside our control.
Even if
we are successful in securing utilization of our products in a
customer’s manufacturing process, sales of many of our
products and services remain dependent on the timing and volume of
the customer’s production, over which we have no control. The
demand for our products depends on regulatory approvals and
frequently depends on the commercial success of the
customer’s supported product. Regulatory processes are
complex, lengthy, expensive, and can often take years to
complete.
We may bear financial risk if we under-price our contracts or
overrun cost estimates.
In
cases where our contracts are structured as fixed price or
fee-for-service with a cap, we bear the financial risk if we
initially under-price our contracts or otherwise overrun our cost
estimates. Such underpricing or significant cost overruns could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We rely on single or a limited number of third-party suppliers for
the raw materials required to produce our products.
Our
dependence on a limited number of third-party suppliers or on a
single supplier, and the challenges we may face in obtaining
adequate supplies of raw materials, involve several risks,
including limited control over pricing, availability, quality and
delivery schedules. We cannot be certain that our current suppliers
will continue to provide us with the quantities of these raw
materials that we require or satisfy our anticipated specifications
and quality requirements. Any supply interruption in limited or
sole sourced raw materials could materially harm our ability to
manufacture our products until a new source of supply, if any,
could be identified and qualified. Although we believe there are
other suppliers of these raw materials, we may be unable to find a
sufficient alternative supply channel in a reasonable time or on
commercially reasonable terms. Any performance failure on the part
of our suppliers could delay the development and commercialization
of our products, or interrupt production of then existing products
that are already marketed, which would have a material adverse
effect on our business.
We may not
be successful in acquiring complementary businesses or products on
favorable terms.
As part of our business strategy, we intend to consider
acquisitions of similar or complementary businesses or products. No
assurance can be given that we will be successful in identifying
attractive acquisition candidates or completing acquisitions on
favorable terms. In addition, any future acquisitions will be
accompanied by the risks commonly associated with acquisitions.
These risks include potential exposure to unknown liabilities of
acquired companies or to acquisition costs and expenses, the
difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and personnel
of the acquired companies, the potential disruption to the business
of the combined company and potential diversion of our management's
time and attention, the impairment of relationships with and the
possible loss of key employees and clients as a result of the
changes in management, the incurrence of amortization expenses and
write-downs and dilution to the shareholders of the combined
company if the acquisition is made for stock of the combined
company. In addition, successful completion of an acquisition may
depend on consents from third parties, including regulatory
authorities and private parties, which consents are beyond our
control. There can be no assurance that products, technologies or
businesses of acquired companies will be effectively assimilated
into the business or product offerings of the combined company or
will have a positive effect on the combined company's revenues or
earnings. Further, the combined company may incur significant
expense to complete acquisitions and to support the acquired
products and businesses. Any such acquisitions may be funded with
cash, debt or equity, which could have the effect of diluting or
otherwise adversely affecting the holdings or the rights of our
existing stockholders.
If we experience a significant disruption in our information
technology systems or if we fail to implement new systems and
software successfully, our business could be adversely
affected.
We
depend on information systems throughout our company to control our
manufacturing processes, process orders, manage inventory, process
and bill shipments and collect cash from our customers, respond to
customer inquiries, contribute to our overall internal control
processes, maintain records of our property, plant and equipment,
and record and pay amounts due vendors and other creditors. If we
were to experience a prolonged disruption in our information
systems that involve interactions with customers and suppliers, it
could result in the loss of sales and customers and/or increased
costs, which could adversely affect our overall business
operation.
Our cash flows and capital resources may be
insufficient to make required payments on future
indebtedness.
On
November 4, 2016, we entered into entered into a business financing
agreement (the “Financing Agreement”) with Western
Alliance Bank (“Western Alliance”), to establish a
formula based revolving credit line pursuant to which the Company
may borrow an aggregate principal amount of up to $5,000,000,
subject to the terms and conditions of the Financing Agreement. The
interest rate will be calculated at a floating rate per month equal
to (a) the greater of (i) 3.50% per year or (ii) the Prime Rate
published in the Money Rates section of the Western Edition of The
Wall Street Journal, or such other rate of interest publicly
announced by Lender as its Prime Rate, plus (b) 2.50 percentage
points. Any borrowings, interest or other fees or obligations that
the Company owes Western Alliance pursuant to the Financing
Agreement (the “Obligations”) will be become due and
payable on November 4, 2018.
As of
December 30, 2017, and March 14, 2018, we did not have any
indebtedness under the Financing Agreement. However, we may incur
indebtedness in the future and such indebtedness could have
important consequences to you. For example, it could:
●
make
it difficult for us to satisfy our other debt
obligations;
●
make
us more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry
conditions;
●
limit our
ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate
requirements;
●
expose us to
interest rate fluctuations because the interest rate on the debt
under the Financing Agreement is variable;
●
require us to
dedicate a portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on
our debt, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow for
operations and other purposes;
●
limit our
flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our
business and the industry in which we operate; and
●
place us at a
competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that may have
proportionately less debt and greater financial
resources.
In
addition, our ability to make payments or refinance our obligations
depends on our successful financial and operating performance, cash
flows and capital resources, which in turn depend upon prevailing
economic conditions and certain financial, business and other
factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors
include, among others:
●
economic and
demand factors affecting our industry;
●
pricing
pressures;
●
increased
operating costs;
●
competitive
conditions; and
●
other operating
difficulties.
If our
cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt
service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital
expenditures, sell material assets or operations, obtain additional
capital or restructure our debt. In the event that we are required
to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt
service and other obligations, the value realized on such assets or
operations will depend on market conditions and the availability of
buyers. Accordingly, any such sale may not, among other things, be
for a sufficient dollar amount. Our obligations pursuant to the
Financing Agreement are secured by a security interest in all of
our assets, exclusive of intellectual property. The foregoing
encumbrances may limit our ability to dispose of material assets or
operations. We also may not be able to restructure our indebtedness
on favorable economic terms, if at all.
We may
incur additional indebtedness in the future. Our incurrence of
additional indebtedness would intensify the risks described
above.
The Financing Agreement contains various covenants limiting
the discretion of our management in operating our
business.
The
Financing Agreement contains various restrictive covenants that
limit our management's discretion in operating our business. These
instruments limit our ability to, among other things:
●
incur additional
debt;
●
grant liens on
assets;
●
make
investments, including capital expenditures;
●
sell
or acquire assets outside the ordinary course of business;
and
●
make
fundamental business changes.
If we
fail to comply with the restrictions in the Financing Agreement, a
default may allow the creditors under the relevant instruments to
accelerate the related debt and to exercise their remedies under
these agreements, which will typically include the right to declare
the principal amount of that debt, together with accrued and unpaid
interest and other related amounts, immediately due and payable, to
exercise any remedies the creditors may have to foreclose on assets
that are subject to liens securing that debt and to terminate any
commitments they had made to supply further funds.
If we are unable to maintain sales, marketing and distribution
capabilities or maintain arrangements with third parties to sell,
market and distribute our products, our business may be
harmed.
To
achieve commercial success for our products, we must sell our
product lines and/or technologies at favorable prices. In addition
to being expensive, maintaining such a sales force is
time-consuming. Qualified direct sales personnel with experience in
the natural products industry are in high demand, and there can be
no assurance that we will be able to hire or retain an effective
direct sales team. Similarly, qualified independent sales
representatives both within and outside the United States are in
high demand, and we may not be able to build an effective network
for the distribution of our product through such representatives.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into
contracts with representatives on terms acceptable to us.
Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to
build an alternate distribution framework should we attempt to do
so.
We may
also need to contract with third parties in order to market our
products. To the extent that we enter into arrangements with third
parties to perform marketing and distribution services, our product
revenue could be lower and our costs higher than if we directly
marketed our products. Furthermore, to the extent that we enter
into co-promotion or other marketing and sales arrangements with
other companies, any revenue received will depend on the skills and
efforts of others, and we do not know whether these efforts will be
successful. If we are unable to establish and maintain adequate
sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, independently or
with others, we will not be able to generate product revenue, and
may not become profitable.
Risks Related to Regulatory Approval of Our Products and Other
Government Regulations
We are subject to regulation by various federal, state and foreign
agencies that require us to comply with a wide variety of
regulations, including those regarding the manufacture of products,
advertising and product label claims, the distribution of our
products and environmental matters. Failure to comply with these
regulations could subject us to fines, penalties and additional
costs.
Some of
our operations are subject to regulation by various United States
federal agencies and similar state and international agencies,
including the Department of Commerce, the FDA, the FTC, the
Department of Transportation and the Department of Agriculture.
These regulations govern a wide variety of product activities, from
design and development to labeling, manufacturing, handling, sales
and distribution of products. If we fail to comply with any of
these regulations, we may be subject to fines or penalties, have to
recall products and/or cease their manufacture and distribution,
which would increase our costs and reduce our sales.
We are
also subject to various federal, state, local and international
laws and regulations that govern the handling, transportation,
manufacture, use and sale of substances that are or could be
classified as toxic or hazardous substances. Some risk of
environmental damage is inherent in our operations and the products
we manufacture, sell, or distribute. Any failure by us to comply
with the applicable government regulations could also result in
product recalls or impositions of fines and restrictions on our
ability to carry on with or expand in a portion or possibly all of
our operations. If we fail to comply with any or all of these
regulations, we may be subject to fines or penalties, have to
recall products and/or cease their manufacture and distribution,
which would increase our costs and reduce our sales.
Government regulations of our customer’s business are
extensive and are constantly changing. Changes in these regulations
can significantly affect customer demand for our products and
services.
The
process by which our customers’ industries are regulated is
controlled by government agencies and depending on the market
segment can be very expensive, time consuming, and uncertain.
Changes in regulations or the enforcement practices of current
regulations could have a negative impact on our customers and, in
turn, our business. At this time, it is unknown how the FDA will
interpret and to what extent it will enforce GMPs, regulations that
will likely affect many of our customers. These uncertainties may
have a material impact on our results of operations, as lack of
enforcement or an interpretation of the regulations that lessens
the burden of compliance for the dietary supplement marketplace may
cause a reduced demand for our products and services.
Changes in government regulation or in practices relating to the
pharmaceutical, dietary supplement, food and cosmetic industry
could decrease the need for the services we provide.
Governmental
agencies throughout the world, including in the United States,
strictly regulate the pharmaceutical, dietary supplement, food and
cosmetic industries. Our business involves helping pharmaceutical
and biotechnology companies navigate the regulatory drug approval
process. Changes in regulation, such as a relaxation in regulatory
requirements or the introduction of simplified drug approval
procedures, or an increase in regulatory requirements that we have
difficulty satisfying or that make our services less competitive,
could eliminate or substantially reduce the demand for our
services. Also, if the government makes efforts to contain drug
costs and pharmaceutical and biotechnology company profits from new
drugs, our customers may spend less, or reduce their spending on
research and development. If health insurers were to change their
practices with respect to reimbursements for pharmaceutical
products, our customers may spend less, or reduce their spending on
research and development.
If we should in the future become required to obtain regulatory
approval to market and sell our goods we will not be able to
generate any revenues until such approval is received.
The
pharmaceutical industry is subject to stringent regulation by a
wide range of authorities. While we believe that, given our present
business, we are not currently required to obtain regulatory
approval to market our goods because, among other things, we do not
(i) produce or market any clinical devices or other products, or
(ii) sell any medical products or services to the customer, we
cannot predict whether regulatory clearance will be required in the
future and, if so, whether such clearance will at such time be
obtained for any products that we are developing or may attempt to
develop. Should such regulatory approval in the future be required,
our goods may be suspended or may not be able to be marketed and
sold in the United States until we have completed the regulatory
clearance process as and if implemented by the FDA. Satisfaction of
regulatory requirements typically takes many years, is dependent
upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product or service and
would require the expenditure of substantial
resources.
If
regulatory clearance of a good that we propose to propose to market
and sell is granted, this clearance may be limited to those
particular states and conditions for which the good is demonstrated
to be safe and effective, which would limit our ability to generate
revenue. We cannot ensure that any good that we develop will meet
all of the applicable regulatory requirements needed to receive
marketing clearance. Failure to obtain regulatory approval will
prevent commercialization of our goods where such clearance is
necessary. There can be no assurance that we will obtain regulatory
approval of our proposed goods that may require it.
Risks Related to the Securities Markets and Ownership of our Equity
Securities
The market price of our common stock may be volatile and adversely
affected by several factors.
The
market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly in
response to various factors and events, including, but not limited
to:
●
our ability to
integrate operations, technology, products and
services;
●
our ability to
execute our business plan;
●
our operating
results are below expectations;
●
our issuance of
additional securities, including debt or equity or a combination
thereof,;
●
announcements of
technological innovations or new products by us or our
competitors;
●
acceptance of and
demand for our products by consumers;
●
media coverage
regarding our industry or us;
●
litigation;
●
disputes with or
our inability to collect from significant customers;
●
loss of any
strategic relationship;
●
industry
developments, including, without limitation, changes in healthcare
policies or practices;
●
economic and other
external factors;
●
reductions in
purchases from our large customers;
●
period-to-period
fluctuations in our financial results; and
●
whether an active
trading market in our common stock develops and is
maintained.
In
addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced
significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the
operating performance of particular companies. These market
fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market
price of our common stock.
Our shares of common stock may be thinly traded, so you may be
unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all.
We
cannot predict the extent to which an active public market for our
common stock will develop or be sustained. This situation may be
attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are
a small company that is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock
brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment
community who generate or influence sales volume, and that even if
we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk
averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as
ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such
time as we have become more seasoned and viable. As a consequence,
there may be periods of several days or weeks when trading activity
in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned
issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that
will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect
on share price. We cannot assure you that a broader or more active
public trading market for our common stock will develop or be
sustained, or that current trading levels will be sustained or not
diminish.
We have not paid cash dividends in the past and do not expect to
pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any return on
investment may be limited to the value of our common
stock.
We have
never paid cash dividends on our capital stock and do not
anticipate paying cash dividends on our capital stock in the
foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on our capital stock
will depend on our earnings, financial condition and other business
and economic factors affecting us at such time as the board of
directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends, our
common stock may be less valuable because a return on your
investment will only occur if the common stock price
appreciates.
The recently passed comprehensive tax reform bill could adversely
affect our business and financial condition.
On
December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law new legislation
that significantly revises the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. The newly enacted federal income tax law, among
other things, contains significant changes to corporate taxation,
including reduction of the corporate tax rate from a top marginal
rate of 35% to a flat rate of 21%, limitation of the tax deduction
for interest expense to 30% of adjusted earnings (except for
certain small businesses), limitation of the deduction for net
operating losses to 80% of current year taxable income and
elimination of net operating loss carrybacks, one time taxation of
offshore earnings at reduced rates regardless of whether they are
repatriated, elimination of U.S. tax on foreign earnings (subject
to certain important exceptions), immediate deductions for certain
new investments instead of deductions for depreciation expense over
time, and modifying or repealing many business deductions and
credits (including reducing the business tax credit for certain
clinical testing expenses incurred in the testing of certain drugs
for rare diseases or conditions). Notwithstanding the
reduction in the corporate income tax rate, the overall impact of
the new federal tax law is uncertain and our business and financial
condition could be adversely affected. In addition, it is
unknown if and to what extent various states will conform to the
newly enacted federal tax law. The impact of this tax reform
on holders of our common stock is likewise uncertain and could be
adverse. We urge our stockholders to consult with their legal
and tax advisors with respect to this legislation and the potential
tax consequences of investing in or holding our common
stock.
Stockholders may experience significant dilution if future equity
offerings are used to fund operations or acquire complementary
businesses.
If
future operations or acquisitions are financed through the issuance
of additional equity securities, stockholders could experience
significant dilution. Securities issued in connection with future
financing activities or potential acquisitions may have rights and
preferences senior to the rights and preferences of our common
stock. In addition, the issuance of shares of our common stock upon
the exercise of outstanding options or warrants may result in
dilution to our stockholders.
We may become involved in securities class action litigation that
could divert management’s attention and harm our
business.
The
stock market in general, and the stocks of early stage companies in
particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations.
These fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to
the operating performance of the companies involved. If these
fluctuations occur in the future, the market price of our shares
could fall regardless of our operating performance. In the past,
following periods of volatility in the market price of a particular
company’s securities, securities class action litigation has
often been brought against that company. If the market price or
volume of our shares suffers extreme fluctuations, then we may
become involved in this type of litigation, which would be
expensive and divert management’s attention and resources
from managing our business.
As a
public company, we may also from time to time make forward-looking
statements about future operating results and provide some
financial guidance to the public markets. Projections may not be
made in a timely manner or we might fail to reach expected
performance levels and could materially affect the price of our
shares. Any failure to meet published forward-looking statements
that adversely affect the stock price could result in losses to
investors, stockholder lawsuits or other litigation, sanctions or
restrictions issued by the SEC.
We have a significant number of outstanding options and warrants,
and future sales of these shares could adversely affect the market
price of our common stock.
As of
December 30, 2017, we had outstanding options exercisable for an
aggregate of 6,534,167 shares of common stock at a weighted
average exercise price of $3.59 per share and outstanding warrants
exercisable for an aggregate of 470,444 shares of common stock at a
weighted average exercise price of $4.15 per share. The holders may
sell many of these shares in the public markets from time to time,
without limitations on the timing, amount or method of sale. As and
when our stock price rises, if at all, more outstanding options and
warrants will be in-the-money and the holders may exercise their
options and warrants and sell a large number of shares. This could
cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
None.
As of
December 30, 2017, we lease approximately 15,000 square feet of
office space in Irvine, California with 2 years remaining on the
lease, approximately 10,000 square feet of space for research and
development laboratory in Longmont, Colorado with 7 years remaining
on the lease, approximately 4,500 square feet of office space in
Los Angeles, California with 4 years remaining on the lease and
approximately 2,300 square feet of office space in Rockville,
Maryland with 3 years remaining on the lease. The below table
illustrates the use of each property by our business
segments.
Business
Segment
|
Property
Used
|
Ingredients
|
All
properties
|
Consumer
Products
|
All
properties
|
Core
Standards and Contract Services
|
Irvine,
CA, Longmont, CO and Rockville, MD
|
We also
rent an apartment with approximately 1,000 square feet in Foothill
Ranch, California, and an apartment with less than 1,100 square
feet in Longmont, Colorado. We use the apartments to accommodate
our traveling employees to each of our California and Colorado
locations. We do not own any real estate. For the year ended
December 30, 2017, our total annual rental expense was
approximately $729,000.
On December 29, 2016, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a complaint (the
“Complaint”) in the United States District Court for
the Central District of California, naming Elysium Health, Inc.
(together with Elysium Health, LLC, “Elysium”) as
defendant. Among other allegations, ChromaDex, Inc. alleged in the
Complaint that (i) Elysium breached the Supply Agreement, dated
June 26, 2014, by and between ChromaDex, Inc. and Elysium (the
“pTeroPure® Supply Agreement”), by failing to make
payments to ChromaDex, Inc. for purchases of pTeroPure®
pursuant to the pTeroPure® Supply Agreement, (ii) Elysium
breached the Supply Agreement, dated February 3, 2014, by and
between ChromaDex, Inc. and Elysium, as amended (the
“NIAGEN® Supply Agreement”), by failing to make
payments to ChromaDex, Inc. for purchases of NIAGEN® pursuant
to the NIAGEN® Supply Agreement, (iii) Elysium breached the
Trademark License and Royalty Agreement, dated February 3, 2014, by
and between ChromaDex, Inc. and Elysium (the “License
Agreement”), by failing to make payments to ChromaDex, Inc.
for royalties due pursuant to the License Agreement and (iv)
certain officers of Elysium made false promises and representations
to induce ChromaDex, Inc. into providing large supplies of
pTeroPure® and NIAGEN® to Elysium pursuant to the
pTeroPure® Supply Agreement and NIAGEN® Supply Agreement.
ChromaDex, Inc. is seeking punitive damages, money damages and
interest.
On January 25, 2017, Elysium filed an answer and counterclaims (the
“Counterclaim”) in response to the Complaint. Among
other allegations, Elysium alleges in the Counterclaim that (i)
ChromaDex, Inc. breached the NIAGEN® Supply Agreement by not
issuing certain refunds or credits to Elysium and for violating
certain confidential information provisions, (ii) ChromaDex, Inc.
breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
pursuant to the NIAGEN® Supply Agreement, (iii) ChromaDex,
Inc. breached certain confidential provisions of the
pTeroPure® Supply Agreement, (iv) ChromaDex, Inc. fraudulently
induced Elysium into entering into the License Agreement (the
“Fraud Claim”), (v) ChromaDex, Inc.’s conduct
constitutes misuse of its patent rights (the “Patent
Claim”) and (vi) ChromaDex, Inc. has engaged in unlawful or
unfair competition under California state law (the “Unfair
Competition Claim”). Elysium is seeking damages for
ChromaDex, Inc.’s alleged breaches of the NIAGEN® Supply
Agreement and pTeroPure® Supply Agreement, and compensatory
damages, punitive damages and/or rescission of the License
Agreement and restitution of any royalty payments conveyed by
Elysium pursuant to the License Agreement, and a declaratory
judgment that ChromaDex, Inc. has engaged in patent
misuse.
On February 15, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. filed an amended complaint.
In the amended complaint, ChromaDex, Inc. re-alleges the claims in
the Complaint, and also alleges that Elysium willfully and
maliciously misappropriated ChromaDex, Inc.’s trade secrets.
On February 15, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. also filed a motion to
dismiss the Fraud Claim, the Patent Claim and the Unfair
Competition Claim. On March 1, 2017, Elysium filed a motion to
dismiss ChromaDex, Inc.'s fraud and trade secret misappropriation
causes of action. On March 6, 2017, Elysium filed a first amended
counterclaim. On March 20, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. moved to dismiss
Elysium's amended fraud, declaratory judgment of patent misuse and
the Unfair Competition Claim. On May 10, 2017, the court ruled on
the motions to dismiss, denying ChromaDex, Inc.’s motion as
to Elysium’s fraud and declaratory judgment claims and
granting ChromaDex, Inc.’s motion with prejudice as to
Elysium’s Unfair Competition Claim. With respect to
Elysium’s motion, the court granted the motion with prejudice
as to ChromaDex, Inc.’s fraud claim and granted with leave to
amend the motion as to ChromaDex, Inc.’s trade secret
misappropriation claims. On May 24, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. answered
the first amended counterclaim and asserted several affirmative
defenses. Also on May 24, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a second
amended complaint, amending the trade secret misappropriation
claims and addressing Elysium’s declaratory judgment of
patent misuse counterclaim. On June 7, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. filed
a third amended complaint dismissing the trade secret
misappropriation claims and asserting two breach of contract claims
for Elysium’s failure to pay for the product delivered. On
June 16, 2017, Elysium answered the third amended complaint. On
August 14, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. moved for judgment on the
pleadings as to Elysium’s declaratory judgment of patent
misuse counterclaim. On September 26, 2017, the court denied
ChromaDex’s motion without prejudice and directed Elysium to
file an amended counterclaim if it intended to maintain its
declaratory judgment counterclaim. On October 11, 2017, Elysium
filed a second amended counterclaim, re-alleging the claims in the
first amended counterclaim and adding a claim for unjust enrichment
and restitution of the royalties Elysium paid to ChromaDex, Inc.
pursuant to the License Agreement. On October 25, 2017, ChromaDex,
Inc. filed a motion to dismiss the declaratory judgment of patent
misuse and unjust enrichment claims and/or strike allegations in
the unjust enrichment claim contained in the second amended
counterclaim. On November 28, 2017, the court denied the motion.
ChromaDex, Inc. answered the second amended counterclaim on
December 12, 2017. The parties are currently in
discovery.
On July 17, 2017, Elysium filed petitions with the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office for inter partes review of U.S. Patent No.
8,197,807 (the “’807 Patent”) and 8,383,086 (the
“’086 Patent”), patents to which ChromaDex, Inc.
is the exclusive licensee. The U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board
(“PTAB”) denied institution of an inter partes review
for the ’807 Patent on January 18, 2018. For the ’086
patent, on January 29, 2018 the PTAB granted institution of an
inter partes review as to claims 1, 3, 4, and 5 and denied
institution as to claim 2.
On September 27, 2017, Elysium Health Inc. ("Elysium Health") filed
a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York, against ChromaDex, Inc. (the “SDNY
Complaint”). Elysium Health alleges in the SDNY Complaint
that ChromaDex, Inc. made false and misleading statements in a
citizen petition to the Food and Drug Administration it filed on or
about August 18, 2017. Among other allegations, Elysium Health
avers that the citizen petition made Elysium Health’s product
appear dangerous, while casting ChromaDex, Inc.’s own product
as safe. The SDNY Complaint asserts four claims for relief: (i)
false advertising under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a);
(ii) trade libel; (iii) deceptive business practices under New York
General Business Law § 349; and (iv) tortious interference
with prospective economic relations. ChromaDex, Inc. denies the
claims in the SDNY Complaint and intends to defend against them
vigorously. On October 26, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. moved to
dismiss the SDNY Complaint on the grounds that, inter alia, its statements in the
citizen petition are immune from liability under the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine, the
litigation privilege, and New York’s Anti-SLAPP statute, and
that the SDNY Complaint failed to state a claim. Elysium Health
opposed the motion on November 2, 2017. ChromaDex, Inc. filed its
reply on November 9, 2017. The motion is currently
pending.
On
October 26, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a complaint in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York against
Elysium Health (the “ChromaDex SDNY Complaint”).
ChromaDex alleges that Elysium Health made material false and
misleading statements to consumers in the promotion, marketing, and
sale of its health supplement product, Basis, and asserts five
claims for relief: (i) false advertising under the Lanham Act, 15
U.S.C. §1125(a); (ii) unfair competition under 15 U.S.C.
§ 1125(a); (iii) deceptive practices under New York General
Business Law § 349; (iv) deceptive practices under New York
General Business Law § 350; and (v) tortious interference with
prospective economic advantage. On November 16, 2017, Elysium
Health moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. ChromaDex,
Inc. opposed the motion on November 30, 2017 and Elysium Health
filed a reply on December 7, 2017. On November 3, 2017, the Court
consolidated the SDNY Complaint and the ChromaDex SDNY Complaint
actions under the caption In re
Elysium Health-ChromaDex Litigation, 17-cv-7394, and stayed
discovery in the consolidated action pending a Court-ordered
mediation. The mediation was unsuccessful and the motion is
currently pending.
The
Company is unable to predict the outcome of these matters and, at
this time, cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of
loss with respect to the legal proceedings discussed herein. As of
December 31, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. did not accrue a potential loss
for the Counterclaim or the SDNY Complaint because ChromaDex, Inc.
believes that the allegations are without merit and thus it is not
probable that a liability has been incurred.
From time to time we are involved in legal proceedings arising in
the ordinary course of our business. We believe that there is no
other litigation pending that is likely to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our financial condition
or results of operations.
Not
applicable.
PART II
Item
5.
|
Since
April 25, 2016, our common stock has been traded on The NASDAQ
Capital Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol
“CDXC.” From November 10, 2014 to April 22, 2016, our
common stock had been traded on the top tier of the OTC Markets
Group, Inc. (the “OTCQX”) under the symbol
“CDXC.”
On
April 13, 2016, the Company effected a 1-for-3 reverse stock split.
All information presented herein has been retrospectively adjusted
to reflect the reverse stock split as if it took place as of the
earliest period presented. An additional 1,632 shares were issued
to round up fractional shares as a result of the reverse stock
split.
The
following table sets forth the range of high and low sale prices of
our common stock for each of the periods indicated as reported by
NASDAQ and OTCQX. Closing sale prices were used for the period when
our common stock was traded on NASDAQ and closing bid quotations
were used for the period when our common stock was traded on OTCQX.
These prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up,
mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual
transactions.
Fiscal Year Ending December 30,
2017
|
||
Quarter Ended
|
High
|
Low
|
December 30,
2017
|
$6.96
|
$3.88
|
September 30,
2017
|
$4.71
|
$2.91
|
July 1,
2017
|
$3.96
|
$2.26
|
April 1,
2017
|
$3.67
|
$2.50
|
Fiscal Year Ending December 31,
2016
|
||
Quarter Ended
|
High
|
Low
|
December 31,
2016
|
$3.31
|
$2.31
|
October 1,
2016
|
$4.39
|
$2.88
|
July 2,
2016
|
$5.76
|
$2.84
|
April 2,
2016
|
$4.77
|
$3.60
|
On
March 8, 2018, the closing sale price was $5.16.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation
Plans
Information
about our equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by
reference to Item 12 of Part III of this Annual
Report.
Performance Graph
The performance graph below compares the annual percentage change
in the cumulative total return on our common stock with the
NASDAQ Capital Market Composite Index and the S&P Small Cap 600
Health Care Index. The chart shows the value as of December 30,
2017, of $100 invested on December 29, 2012. The stock price
performance below is not necessarily indicative of future
performance.
The
performance graph below is not “soliciting material,”
shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC and shall not
be incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof
and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such
filing, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific
reference in such filing.
|
12/29/12
|
12/28/13
|
1/3/15
|
1/2/16
|
12/31/16
|
12/30/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChromaDex Corporation
|
100.00
|
288.03
|
162.02
|
219.62
|
198.62
|
352.84
|
NASDAQ Composite
|
100.00
|
141.58
|
162.13
|
173.35
|
187.34
|
242.49
|
S&P Small Cap 600 Health Care Index
|
100.00
|
135.35
|
152.67
|
165.19
|
159.35
|
211.40
|
Holders of Our Common Stock
As of
March 8, 2018, we had approximately 58 registered holders of record
of our common stock.
Dividend Policy
We have
not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock during
either of the two most recent fiscal years and have no current
intention to pay any cash dividends. Our ability to pay cash
dividends is governed by applicable provisions of Delaware law and
is subject to the discretion of our Board of
Directors.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Other
than as previously disclosed in our past Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, the Company did not have any
sales of unregistered securities for the period covered by this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item
6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The
annual financial information set forth below has been derived from
our audited consolidated financial statements. The information
should be read together with, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” the
consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in
this Form 10-K and in our SEC filings. The selected financial data in this
section are not intended to replace our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes. Our historical results are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the
future and results of interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results for the entire year.
-37-
|
Years Ended
|
||||
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales,
net
|
$21,201,482
|
$21,664,648
|
$17,884,886
|
$11,861,099
|
$7,438,857
|
Cost
of sales
|
10,724,177
|
11,274,114
|
10,350,281
|
6,855,690
|
3,926,765
|
Gross profit
|
10,477,305
|
10,390,534
|
7,534,605
|
5,005,409
|
3,512,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
and marketing
|
4,459,224
|
1,558,213
|
1,507,868
|
1,482,784
|
1,627,795
|
Research
and development
|
4,007,381
|
2,522,768
|
891,601
|
513,671
|
134,040
|
General
and administrative
|
17,641,889
|
9,214,763
|
7,201,231
|
7,648,773
|
4,747,561
|
Loss
from investment in affiliate
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
45,829
|
44,961
|
Other
|
745,773
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Operating expenses
|
26,854,267
|
13,295,744
|
9,600,700
|
9,691,057
|
6,554,357
|
Operating loss
|
(16,376,962)
|
(2,905,210)
|
(2,066,095)
|
(4,685,648)
|
(3,042,265)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net
|
(152,784)
|
(333,286)
|
(566,917)
|
(123,976)
|
(4,006)
|
Loss
on debt extinguishment
|
-
|
(313,099)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Nonoperating expenses
|
(152,784)
|
(646,385)
|
(566,917)
|
(123,976)
|
(4,006)
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
(16,529,746)
|
(3,551,595)
|
(2,633,012)
|
(4,809,624)
|
(3,046,271)
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
-
|
-
|
(4,527)
|
-
|
-
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
(16,529,746)
|
(3,551,595)
|
(2,637,539)
|
(4,809,624)
|
(3,046,271)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
(315,140)
|
623,410
|
(133,528)
|
(578,561)
|
(1,373,254)
|
Gain
on sale of discontinued operations
|
5,467,268
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
|
5,152,128
|
623,410
|
(133,528)
|
(578,561)
|
(1,373,254)
|
Net loss
|
$(11,377,618)
|
$(2,928,185)
|
$(2,771,067)
|
$(5,388,185)
|
$(4,419,525)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
$(0.37)
|
$(0.10)
|
$(0.07)
|
$(0.14)
|
$(0.09)
|
Earnings
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
$0.11
|
$0.02
|
$(0.01)
|
$(0.01)
|
$(0.04)
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
$(0.26)
|
$(0.08)
|
$(0.08)
|
$(0.15)
|
$(0.13)
|
Basic
and diluted weighted average
|
|
|
|
|
|
common
shares outstanding
|
44,598,879
|
37,294,321
|
35,877,341
|
35,486,460
|
33,329,148
|
|
At The End of Year
|
||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
$45,388,848
|
$1,642,429
|
$5,549,672
|
$3,964,750
|
$2,261,336
|
Working capital
(1)
|
7,415,742
|
7,786,372
|
4,400,432
|
2,189,442
|
1,602,008
|
Total
assets
|
62,723,600
|
19,752,068
|
18,749,209
|
11,516,847
|
8,986,892
|
Long term
debt
|
-
|
-
|
3,345,335
|
1,977,113
|
-
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
$53,833,668
|
$9,974,358
|
$5,274,674
|
$3,998,391
|
$5,665,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Trade receivables plus inventories less accounts
payable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
||||
Consolidated Cash Flow Data
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in
operating activities
|
$(9,804,178)
|
$(2,936,596)
|
$(2,111,138)
|
$(2,580,406)
|
$(3,906,011)
|
Net cash provided
by (used in) investing activities
|
4,601,926
|
(1,724,922)
|
(647,731)
|
1,590,275
|
998,651
|
Net cash provided
by financing activities
|
$48,948,671
|
$754,275
|
$4,343,791
|
$2,693,545
|
$4,648,696
|
You should read the following discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operation together with “Selected
Financial Data,” the consolidated financial statements and
the related notes included elsewhere this Form 10-K. This
discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks
and uncertainties. When reviewing the discussion below, you should
keep in mind the substantial risks and uncertainties that impact
our business. In particular, we encourage you to review the risks
and uncertainties described in “Risk Factors” in Part
I, Item 1A in this Form 10-K. These risks and uncertainties could
cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in
forward-looking statements contained in this report or implied by
past results and trends.
Overview
ChromaDex
Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries, ChromaDex, Inc.,
Healthspan Research, LLC and ChromaDex Analytics, Inc.
(collectively, the “Company” or, in the first person as
“we” “us” and “our”) are an
integrated, global nutraceutical company devoted to improving the
way people age. The Company's scientists partner with leading
universities and research institutions worldwide to uncover the
full potential of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide ("NAD") and
identify and develop novel, science-based ingredients. ChromaDex's
flagship ingredient, NIAGEN® nicotinamide riboside, sold
directly to consumers as TRU NIAGEN®, is backed with clinical
and scientific research, as well as intellectual property
protection. The Company also has a core standards and contract
services segment, which focuses on natural product fine chemicals
(known as “phytochemicals”), chemistry services, and
regulatory consulting.
The
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations are based on the ChromaDex financial statements, which
have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. The preparation of these financial
statements requires making estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, as well as the reported revenues, if any, and expenses
during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate such
estimates and judgments, including those described in greater
detail below. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
As of
December 30, 2017, the cash and cash equivalents totaled
approximately $45.4 million. The Company anticipates that its
current cash, cash equivalents and cash to be generated from
operations will be sufficient to meet its projected operating plans
through at least March 16, 2019. The Company may, however, seek
additional capital prior to March 16, 2019, both to meet its
projected operating plans after March 16, 2019 and/or to fund its
longer term strategic objectives.
Additional
capital may come from public and/or private stock or debt
offerings, borrowings under lines of credit or other sources. These
additional funds may not be available on favorable terms, or at
all. Further, if we issue equity or debt securities to
raise additional funds, our existing stockholders may experience
dilution and the new equity or debt securities we issue may have
rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our existing
stockholders. In addition, if we raise additional funds through
collaboration, licensing or other similar arrangements, it may be
necessary to relinquish valuable rights to our products or
proprietary technologies, or to grant licenses on terms that are
not favorable to us. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms,
we may not be able to develop or enhance our products, obtain the
required regulatory clearances or approvals, achieve long term
strategic objectives, take advantage of future opportunities, or
respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated customer
requirements. Any of these events could adversely affect our
ability to achieve our development and commercialization goals,
which could have a material and adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Some of
our operations are subject to regulation by various state and
federal agencies. Dietary supplements are subject to FDA, FTC and
U.S. Department of Agriculture regulations relating to composition,
labeling and advertising claims. These regulations may in some
cases, particularly with respect to those applicable to new
ingredients, require a notification that must be submitted to the
FDA along with evidence of safety. There are similar regulations
related to food additives.
Results of Operations
Our
losses per basic and diluted share were $0.26, $0.08 and $0.08 for
the twelve-month periods ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016
and January 2, 2016, respectively. Over the next two years, we plan
to continue to increase marketing, research and development efforts
for our flagship ingredient, NIAGEN® nicotinamide riboside,
and our consumer branded product TRU
NIAGEN®.
|
Twelve months
ending
|
||
|
Dec.
30, 2017
|
Dec. 31,
2016
|
Jan. 2,
2016
|
Sales
|
$21,201,482
|
$21,664,648
|
$17,884,886
|
Cost of
sales
|
10,724,177
|
11,274,114
|
10,350,281
|
Gross
profit
|
10,477,305
|
10,390,534
|
7,534,605
|
Operating
expenses -Sales and marketing
|
4,459,224
|
1,558,213
|
1,507,868
|
-Research
and development
|
4,007,381
|
2,522,768
|
891,601
|
-General
and administrative
|
17,641,889
|
9,214,763
|
7,201,231
|
-Other
|
745,773
|
-
|
-
|
Nonoperating
-Interest expense,
net
|
(152,784)
|
(333,286)
|
(566,917)
|
-Loss
on debt extinguishment
|
-
|
(313,099)
|
-
|
Provision for
income taxes
|
-
|
-
|
(4,527)
|
Loss from
continuing operations
|
(16,529,746)
|
(3,551,595)
|
(2,637,539)
|
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations, net
|
5,152,128
|
623,410
|
(133,528)
|
Net
loss
|
$(11,377,618)
|
$(2,928,185)
|
$(2,771,067)
|
Year Ended December 30, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31,
2016
Net Sales. Net sales consist of gross sales less discounts
and returns.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
|
December 30, 2017
|
December
31, 2016
|
Change
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
Ingredients
|
$11,153,000
|
$16,775,000
|
-34%
|
Consumer
Products
|
5,465,000
|
-
|
-
|
Core
standards and contract services
|
4,583,000
|
4,890,000
|
-6%
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
$21,201,000
|
$21,665,000
|
-2%
|
●
The decrease in
sales for the ingredients segment is mainly due to decreased sales
of NIAGEN®. The Company made a strategic decision to
transition from an ingredient and testing company to a consumer
driven nutraceutical company. This has resulted in a shift in our
sales away from resellers of NIAGEN® to our TRU NIAGEN®
branded consumer product.
●
With the
acquisition of Healthspan Research LLC in March 2017, the Company
began selling consumer products that contain the Company's branded
NIAGEN® ingredient. Segregation of the financial results for
the consumer products segment coincides with the Company's
strategic shift towards the consumer products. The Company expects
the sales for consumer products segment to grow over the next
twelve months.
●
The decrease in
sales for the core standards and contract services segment is
primarily due to decreased sales of analytical reference
standards.
Cost of Sales. Costs of sales include raw materials, labor,
overhead, and delivery costs.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
|||
|
December 30, 2017
|
December
31, 2016
|
||
|
Amount
|
%
of
net
sales
|
Amount
|
%
of
net
sales
|
Cost of sales:
|
|
|
|
|
Ingredients
|
$5,492,000
|
49%
|
$7,920,000
|
47%
|
Consumer
Products
|
2,189,000
|
40%
|
-
|
-
|
Core
standards and contract services
|
3,043,000
|
66%
|
3,354,000
|
69%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
$10,724,000
|
51%
|
$11,274,000
|
52%
|
The
cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, decreased
1%.
●
The cost of sales,
as a percentage of net sales, for the ingredients segment increased
2%. This increase as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to
a write-off of our NIAGEN® related inventory of approximately
$183,000 in 2017.
●
The cost of sales,
as a percentage of net sales for the core standards and contract
services segment, decreased 3%. We were able to lower our reference
standards purchasing costs by diversifying our
sources.
Gross Profit. Gross profit is net sales less the cost of
sales and is affected by a number of factors including product mix,
competitive pricing and costs of products and
services.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
|
December 30, 2017
|
December
31, 2016
|
Change
|
Gross profit:
|
|
|
|
Ingredients
|
$5,661,000
|
$8,855,000
|
-36%
|
Consumer
Products
|
3,276,000
|
-
|
-
|
Core
standards and contract services
|
1,540,000
|
1,536,000
|
0%
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
$10,477,000
|
$10,391,000
|
1%
|
●
The decreased gross
profit for the ingredients segment is due to the decreased sales of
NIAGEN®. The Company made a strategic decision to transition
from an ingredient and testing company to a consumer driven
nutraceutical company. This has resulted in a shift in our sales
away from resellers of NIAGEN® to our TRU NIAGEN® branded
consumer product.
●
The consumer
products segment posted gross profit of $3.3 million for the year
ending in December 30, 2017. The Company expects the sales and
gross profit for consumer products segment to grow over the next
twelve months.
●
The gross profit
for the core standards and contract services segment remained the
same as the decrease in sales was offset by improved
profitability.
Operating Expenses – Sales and Marketing. Sales and
Marketing Expenses consist of salaries, advertising and marketing
expenses.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
|
December 30, 2017
|
December
31, 2016
|
Change
|
Sales and marketing expenses:
|
|
|
|
Ingredients
|
$1,280,000
|
$1,197,000
|
7%
|
Consumer
Products
|
2,673,000
|
-
|
-
|
Core
standards and contract services
|
506,000
|
361,000
|
40%
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales and marketing
expenses
|
$4,459,000
|
$1,558,000
|
186%
|
●
For the ingredients
segment, the increase is largely due to increased marketing efforts
to raise consumer awareness for our line of proprietary
ingredients.
●
For the consumer
products segment, we have increased staffing as well as direct
marketing expenses associated with social media and other customer
awareness and acquisition programs. We will continue to expand both
staffing as well as increase other marketing expense as we invest
in building out our own global branded consumer product
business.
●
For the core
standards and contract services segment, the increase is mainly due
to our increased marketing efforts.
Operating Expenses – Research and Development.
Research and Development Expenses consist of clinical trials and
process development expenses.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
|
December 30, 2017
|
December
31, 2016
|
Change
|
Research and development expenses:
|
|
|
|
Ingredients
|
$2,903,000
|
$2,488,000
|
17%
|
Consumer
Products
|
1,104,000
|
-
|
-
|
Core
standards and contract services
|
-
|
35,000
|
-100%
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development
expenses
|
$4,007,000
|
$2,523,000
|
59%
|
●
In 2017, we began
allocating the research and development expenses related to our
NIAGEN® branded ingredient to the ingredients and consumer
products segment, proportional to revenues recorded. Previously,
these expenses were recorded all in the ingredients segment.
Overall, we increased our research and development efforts compared
to 2016 and we plan to continue to increase research and
development efforts for our flagship ingredient, NIAGEN®
nicotinamide riboside.
●
For the core
standards and contract services segment, we explored processes to
develop certain compounds at a larger scale during the year ended
December 31, 2016.
Operating Expenses – General and Administrative.
General and Administrative Expenses consist of general company
administration, IT, accounting and executive management
expenses.
|
Twelve months
ending
|
||
|
December
30, 2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
$17,642,000
|
$9,215,000
|
91%
|
|
|
|
|
The
following expenses contributed to the increase in general and
administrative expenses in 2017:
●
An increase in
legal expenses. Our legal expenses increased to approximately $5.1
million in 2017 compared to approximately $1.3 million in 2016. The
ongoing litigation with Elysium and our increased efforts to file
and maintain patents related to the proprietary ingredient
technologies were the main reasons for the increase in legal
expenses.
●
An increase in
share-based compensation. Our share-based compensation expense for
2017 increased to approximately $4.6 million compared to
approximately $1.2 million for 2016.
●
Severance payments
related our former Chief Financial Officer, Thomas Varvaro. The
Company made an accrual of $0.6 million for future payments to be
made over the next two years.
●
An
increase of approximately
$0.4 million in expenses associated with information and
technology. We invested in additional staff and as well as external
consulting in developing and maintaining our Ecommerce platform,
which we use to sell our branded consumer product TRU
NIAGEN®.
Operating Expenses – Other. Other expense consists of
loss from an ongoing litigation.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
|
December 30, 2017
|
December
31, 2016
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
$746,000
|
$-
|
-
|
●
In relation to the
ongoing litigation, the Company incurred a write-off of
approximately $746,000 in gross trade receivable from Elysium
related to royalties billed as part of the existing Trademark
License and Royalty Agreement.
Nonoperating – Interest Expense, net. Interest
expense, net consists of interest on loan payable and capital
leases offset by interest income.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
|
December 30, 2017
|
December
31, 2016
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
$153,000
|
$333,000
|
-54%
|
●
The decrease in
interest expense was mainly due to the term loan from Hercules
Technology II, L.P. which the Company drew down an initial $2.5
million on September 29, 2014 and a second $2.5 million on June 18,
2015. The Company fully repaid the loan on June 14,
2016.
Depreciation and Amortization. For the twelve-month period
ended December 30, 2017, we recorded approximately $0.5 million in
depreciation compared to approximately $0.3 million for the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2016. We depreciate our
assets on a straight-line basis, based on the estimated useful
lives of the respective assets. We amortize intangible assets using
a straight-line method, generally over 10 years. For licensed
patent rights, the useful lives are 10 years or the remaining term
of the patents underlying licensing rights, whichever is shorter.
The useful lives of subsequent milestone payments that are
capitalized are the remaining useful life of the initial licensing
payment that was capitalized. In the twelve-month period ended
December 30, 2017, we recorded amortization on intangible assets of
approximately $0.2 million compared to approximately $0.1 million
for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2016.
Income Taxes. At December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016,
the Company maintained a full valuation allowance against the
entire deferred income tax balance which resulted in an effective
tax rate of 0% for each of 2017 and 2016.
Net cash used in operating activities. Net cash used in
operating activities for the twelve-month period ended December 30,
2017 was approximately $9.8 million as compared to approximately
$2.9 million for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2016.
Along with the net loss, a decrease in accounts payable was the
largest use of cash during the twelve-month period ended December
30, 2017. Net cash used in operating activities for the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2016 largely reflects
increase in trade receivables along with the net loss.
We
expect our operating cash flows to fluctuate significantly in
future periods as a result of fluctuations in our operating
results, shipment timetables, accounts receivable collections,
inventory management, and the timing of our payments, among other
factors.
Net cash used in investing activities. Net cash provided by
investing activities was approximately $4.6 million for the
twelve-month period ended December 30, 2017, compared to
approximately $1.7 million used in for the twelve-month period
ended December 31, 2016. Net cash provided by investing activities
for the twelve-month period ended December 30, 2017 mainly
consisted of proceeds from disposal of assets, offset by purchases
of leasehold improvements and equipment and intangible assets. Net
cash used in investing activities for the twelve-month period ended
December 31, 2016 mainly consisted of purchases of leasehold
improvements and equipment and intangible assets.
Net cash provided by financing activities. Net cash provided
by financing activities was approximately $48.9 million for the
twelve-month period ended December 30, 2017, compared to
approximately $0.8 million for the twelve-month period ended
December 31, 2016. Net cash provided by financing activities for
2017 mainly consisted of proceeds from issuances of our common
stock and exercise of stock options, offset by principal payments
on capital leases. Net cash provided by financing activities for
2016 mainly consisted of proceeds from issuances of our common
stock and warrants through a private offering to our existing
stockholders and exercise of stock options, offset by principal
payments on loan payable and capital leases.
Trade Receivables. As of December 30, 2017, we had
approximately $5.3 million in trade receivables as compared to
approximately $5.9 million as of December 31, 2016.
Inventories. As of December 30, 2017, we had approximately
$5.8 million in inventory, compared to approximately $7.9 million
as of December 31, 2016. As of December 30, 2017, our inventory
consisted of approximately $4.2 million of bulk ingredients,
approximately $0.7 million of consumer products and approximately
$0.9 million of phytochemical reference standards. Bulk
ingredients are proprietary compounds sold to customers in larger
quantities, typically in kilograms. These ingredients are
used by our customers in the dietary supplement, food and beverage,
animal health, cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries to
manufacture their final products. Consumer products inventory
consists of TRU NIAGEN® branded finished bottles of dietary
supplement products that contain NIAGEN® ingredient and
related work-in-process inventory. Phytochemical reference
standards are small quantities of plan-based compounds typically
used to research an array of potential attributes or for quality
control purposes. The Company currently lists over 1,800
phytochemicals and 400 botanical reference materials in our catalog
and holds a lot of these as inventory in small quantities, mostly
in grams and milligrams.
Our
normal operating cycle for reference standards is currently longer
than one year. Due to the large number of different items we carry,
certain groups of these reference standards have a sales frequency
that is slower than others and varies greatly year to year. In
addition, for certain reference standards, the cost saving is
advantageous when purchased in larger quantities and we have taken
advantage of such opportunities when available. Such factors have
resulted in an operating cycle to be more than one year on average.
The Company gains competitive advantage through the broad offering
of reference standards and it is critical for the Company to
continue to expand its library of reference standards it offers for
the growth of business. Nevertheless, the Company has recently made
changes in its reference standards inventory purchasing practice,
which the management believes will result in an improved turnover
rate and shorter operating cycle without impacting our competitive
advantage.
The
Company regularly reviews inventories on hand and reduces the
carrying value for slow-moving and obsolete inventory, inventory
not meeting quality standards and inventory subject to expiration.
The reduction of the carrying value for slow-moving and obsolete
inventory is based on current estimates of future product demand,
market conditions and related management judgment. Any significant
unanticipated changes in future product demand or market conditions
that vary from current expectations could have an impact on the
value of inventories.
We
strive to optimize our supply chain as we constantly search for
better and more reliable sources and suppliers of bulk ingredients
and phytochemical reference standards. By doing so, we believe we
can lower the costs of our inventory, which we can then pass along
the savings to our customers. In addition, we are working with our
suppliers and partners to develop more efficient manufacturing
methods of the raw materials, in an effort to lower the costs of
our inventory.
Accounts Payable. As of December 30, 2017, we had $3.7
million in accounts payable compared to approximately $6.0 million
as of December 31, 2016.
Advances from Customers. As of December 30, 2017, we had
approximately $0.4 million in advances from customers compared to
approximately $0.4 million as of December 31, 2016. These advances
are for large-scale consulting projects, contract services and
contract research projects where we require a deposit before
beginning work.
Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended January 2,
2016
Net Sales. Net sales consist of gross sales less discounts
and returns.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
|
December 31, 2016
|
January
2, 2016
|
Change
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
Ingredients
|
$16,775,000
|
$12,542,000
|
34%
|
Core
standards and contract services
|
4,890,000
|
5,343,000
|
-8%
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
$21,665,000
|
$17,885,000
|
21%
|
●
The increase in
sales for the ingredients segment is due to increased sales of
NIAGEN® and PTEROPURE®.
●
The decrease in
sales for the core standards and contract services segment is
primarily due to decreased sales from our regulatory consulting
operations. For regulatory consulting operations, we put a further
emphasis on intercompany work supporting our ingredients
segment.
Cost of Sales. Costs of sales include raw materials, labor,
overhead, and delivery costs.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
|||
|
December 31, 2016
|
January
2, 2016
|
||
|
Amount
|
%
of
net
sales
|
Amount
|
%
of
net
sales
|
Cost of sales:
|
|
|
|
|
Ingredients
|
$7,920,000
|
47%
|
$6,664,000
|
53%
|
Core
standards and contract services
|
3,354,000
|
69%
|
3,686,000
|
69%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
$11,274,000
|
52%
|
$10,350,000
|
58%
|
The
cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, decreased
6%.
●
The decrease in
cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, for the ingredients
segment is largely due to price reductions from our suppliers
through increased purchase volumes.
●
The cost of sales,
as a percentage of net sales for the core standards and contract
services segment remained the same at 69%.
Gross Profit. Gross profit is net sales less the cost of
sales and is affected by a number of factors including product mix,
competitive pricing and costs of products and
services.
|
Twelve months
ending
|
||
|
December
31, 2016
|
January 2,
2016
|
Change
|
Gross
profit:
|
|
|
|
Ingredients
|
$8,855,000
|
$5,878,000
|
51%
|
Core
standards and contract services
|
1,536,000
|
1,657,000
|
-7%
|
|
|
|
|
Total
gross profit
|
$10,391,000
|
$7,535,000
|
38%
|
|
|
|
|
●
The gross profit
for the ingredients segment increased due to the increased sales of
the ingredient portfolio we offer, coupled with lower prices from
our suppliers due to increased purchase volumes.
●
The decreased gross
profit for the core standards and contract services segment is
largely due to decreased sales from our regulatory consulting
operations, which put a greater focus on intercompany work
supporting our ingredients segment.
Operating Expenses – Sales and Marketing. Sales and
Marketing Expenses consist of salaries, advertising and marketing
expenses.
|
Twelve months
ending
|
||
|
December
31, 2016
|
January 2,
2016
|
Change
|
Sales
and marketing expenses:
|
|
|
|
Ingredients
|
$1,197,000
|
$1,112,000
|
8%
|
Core
standards and contract services
|
361,000
|
396,000
|
-9%
|
|
|
|
|
Total
sales and marketing expenses
|
$1,558,000
|
$1,508,000
|
3%
|
|
|
|
|
●
For the ingredients
segment, the increase is largely due to increased marketing efforts
to raise the consumer awareness for our line of proprietary
ingredients.
●
For the core
standards and contract services segment, the decrease is largely
due to making certain operational changes as certain personnel who
were previously assigned to the sales and marketing group were
moved to an administrative group.
Operating Expenses – Research and Development.
Research and Development Expenses consist of clinical trials and
process development expenses.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
|
December 31, 2016
|
January
2, 2016
|
Change
|
Research and development expenses:
|
|
|
|
Ingredients
|
$2,488,000
|
$892,000
|
179%
|
Core
standards and contract services
|
35,000
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development
expenses
|
$2,523,000
|
$892,000
|
183%
|
●
For the ingredients
segment, we increased our research and development efforts with a
focus on NIAGEN®.
●
For the core
standards and contract services segment, the expense is mainly
associated with exploring processes to develop certain compounds at
a larger scale.
Operating Expenses – General and Administrative.
General and Administrative Expenses consist of general company
administration, IT, accounting and executive management
expenses.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
|
December 31, 2016
|
January
2, 2016
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative
|
$9,215,000
|
$7,201,000
|
28%
|
●
One of the factors
that contributed to the increase in general and administrative
expenses was an increase in bad debt expense. Our bad debt expense
for 2016 increased to approximately $0.9 million compared to $0.4
million for 2015. In December 2016, we recorded an allowance of
$0.5 million for a certain doubtful account against bad debt
expenses.
●
Another factor that
contributed to the increase was an increase in patent maintenance
expense. Our patent maintenance expense for 2016 increased to
approximately $0.7 million compared to approximately $0.4 million
for 2015.
●
Another factor that
contributed to the increase was an increase of approximately $0.5
million in expenses associated with administrative staff. We made
certain operational changes as certain personnel who were
previously assigned to our sales and marketing group were moved to
an administrative group in 2016.
●
Another factor that
contributed to the increase in general and administrative expense
was an increase in royalties we pay to patent holders as the sales
for licensed products increased in 2016. For 2016, royalty expense
increased to approximately $0.7 million, compared to approximately
$0.5 million for 2015.
●
Also, there were
one-time expenses of approximately $0.1 million associated with the
initial listing of the Company’s stock on the NASDAQ Capital
Market in 2016.
●
These increases in
expenses were offset by the decrease in share-based compensation
expense. For 2016, our share-based compensation expense decreased
to approximately $1.2 million compared to approximately $2.0
million for 2015.
Nonoperating – Interest Expense, net. Interest expense
consists of interest on loan payable and capital leases offset by
interest income.
|
Twelve months
ending
|
||
|
December
31, 2016
|
January 2,
2016
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net
|
$333,000
|
$567,000
|
-41%
|
|
|
|
|
●
The decrease in
interest expense was mainly related to the Term Loan Agreement
dated September 29, 2014, between the Company and Hercules
Technology II, L.P, which the Company drew down an initial $2.5
million on September 29, 2014 and a second $2.5 million on June 18,
2015. The Company fully repaid the loan on June 14,
2016.
Depreciation and Amortization. For the twelve-month period
ended December 31, 2016, we recorded approximately $0.3 million in
depreciation compared to approximately $0.3 million for the
twelve-month period ended January 2, 2016. We depreciate our assets
on a straight-line basis, based on the estimated useful lives of
the respective assets. We amortize intangible assets using a
straight-line method, generally over 10 years. For licensed patent
rights, the useful lives are 10 years or the remaining term of the
patents underlying licensing rights, whichever is shorter. The
useful lives of subsequent milestone payments that are capitalized
are the remaining useful life of the initial licensing payment that
was capitalized. In the twelve-month period ended December 31,
2016, we recorded amortization on intangible assets of
approximately $88,000 compared to approximately $45,000 for the
twelve-month period ended January 2, 2016.
Income Taxes. At December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, the
Company maintained a full valuation allowance against the entire
deferred income tax balance which resulted in an effective tax rate
of 0% for 2016 and 0.2% for 2015.
Net cash used in operating activities. Net cash used in
operating activities for the twelve-month period ended December 31,
2016 was approximately $2.9 million as compared to approximately
$2.1 million for the twelve-month period ended January 2, 2016.
Along with the net loss, an increase in trade receivables were the
largest uses of cash during the twelve-month period ended December
31, 2016. Net cash used in operating activities for the
twelve-month period ended January 2, 2016 largely reflects increase
in inventories, trade receivables along with the net loss, as
well.
We
expect our operating cash flows to fluctuate significantly in
future periods as a result of fluctuations in our operating
results, shipment timetables, accounts receivable collections,
inventory management, and the timing of our payments, among other
factors.
Net cash used in investing activities. Net cash used in
investing activities was approximately $1.7 million for the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2016, compared to
approximately $0.6 million for the twelve-month period ended
January 2, 2016. Net cash used in investing activities for the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2016 mainly consisted of
purchases of leasehold improvements and equipment and intangible
assets. Net cash used in investing activities for the twelve-month
period ended January 2, 2016 also consisted of purchases of
leasehold improvements and equipment and intangible
assets.
Net cash provided by financing activities. Net cash provided
by financing activities was approximately $0.8 million for the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2016, compared to
approximately $4.3 million for the twelve-month period ended
January 2, 2016. Net cash provided by financing activities for 2016
mainly consisted of proceeds from issuances of our common stock and
warrants through a private offering to our existing stockholders
and exercise of stock options, offset by principal payments on loan
payable and capital leases. Net cash provided by financing
activities for 2015 consisted of proceeds from loan payable and
issuances of our common stock and warrants through a private
offering to our existing stockholders.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the
twelve-month periods ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and
January 2, 2016, the Company has incurred losses from continuing
operations of approximately $16.5 million, $3.6 million and $2.6
million, respectively. Net cash used in operating activities for
the twelve-month periods ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016
and January 2, 2016 was approximately $9.8 million, $2.9 million
and $2.1 million, respectively. The losses and the uses of cash are
primarily due to expenses associated with the development and
expansion of our operations. These operations have been financed
through capital contributions, the issuance of common stock and
warrants through private placements, and the issuance of
debt.
Our
Board of Directors periodically reviews our capital requirements in
light of our proposed business plan. Our future capital
requirements will remain dependent upon a variety of factors,
including cash flow from operations, the ability to increase sales,
increasing our gross profits from current levels, reducing sales
and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales, continued
development of customer relationships, and our ability to market
our new products successfully. However, based on our results from
operations, we may determine that we need additional financing to
implement our business plan. Additional financing may come from
public and private equity or debt offerings, borrowings under lines
of credit or other sources. These additional funds may not be
available on favorable terms, or at all. There can be no assurance
we will be successful in raising these additional funds. Without
adequate financing we may have to further delay or terminate
product or service expansion plans. Any inability to raise
additional financing would have a material adverse effect on
us.
As of
December 30, 2017, the cash and cash equivalents totaled
approximately $45.4 million. The Company anticipates that its
current cash, cash equivalents and cash to be generated from
operations will be sufficient to meet its projected operating plans
through at least March 16, 2019. The Company may, however, seek
additional capital prior to March 16, 2019, both to meet its
projected operating plans after March 16, 2019 and/or to fund its
longer term strategic objectives.
Dividend Policy
We have
not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We
presently intend to retain earnings for use in our operations and
to finance our business. Any change in our dividend policy is
within the discretion of our board of directors and will depend,
among other things, on our earnings, debt service and capital
requirements, restrictions in financing agreements, if any,
business conditions, legal restrictions and other factors that our
board of directors deems relevant.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
During
the fiscal years ended December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we
had no off-balance sheet arrangements other than ordinary operating
leases as disclosed in the accompanying financial
statements.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The
following table summarizes our contractual obligations and other
commitments as of December 30, 2017:
|
Payments due by period
|
|||||
|
Total
|
2018
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
leases
|
$576,000
|
$236,000
|
$196,000
|
$126,000
|
$18,000
|
$-
|
Operating
leases
|
2,093,000
|
601,000
|
590,000
|
424,000
|
340,000
|
138,000
|
Purchase
obligations
|
3,571,000
|
3,489,000
|
82,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$6,240,000
|
$4,326,000
|
$868,000
|
$550,000
|
$358,000
|
$138,000
|
Capital leases. We lease equipment under capitalized lease
obligations with a term of typically 4 or 5 years. We make monthly
instalment payments for these leases.
Operating leases. We lease our office and research
facilities in California, Colorado and Maryland under operating
lease agreements that expire at various dates from September 2018
through February 2024. We make monthly payments on these
leases.
Purchase obligations. We enter into purchase obligations
with various vendors for goods and services that we need for our
operations. The purchase obligations for goods and services include
inventory, research and development, and laboratory
supplies.
Critical Accounting Policies
The
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations are based on our financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires
us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosures. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate these estimates,
including those related to the valuation of share-based payments.
We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
We
believe that of our significant accounting policies, which are
described in Note 2 of the Financial Statements, set forth in Item
8, the following accounting policies involve the greatest degree of
judgment and complexity. Accordingly, these are the policies we
believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and
evaluating our consolidated financial condition and results of
operations.
Revenue recognition: The Company recognizes sales and the
related cost of sales at the time the merchandise is shipped to
customers or service is performed, when each of the following
conditions have been met: an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred, there is a fixed price, and collectability is reasonably
assured. Discounts, returns and allowances related to sales,
including an estimated reserve for returns and allowances, are
recorded as reduction of revenue.
Shipping
and handling fees billed to customers and the cost of shipping and
handling fees billed to customers are included in Net sales.
Shipping and handling fees not billed to customers are recognized
as cost of sales.
Taxes
collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities
are excluded from revenue, which is presented on a net basis in the
statement of operations.
In May
2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts
with Customers: Topic 606 (ASU 2014-09), to supersede nearly all
existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles ("GAAP"). The core principle of ASU 2014-09
is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are
transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or
services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this
core principle and, in doing so, it is possible more judgment and
estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process
than required under existing U.S. GAAP including identifying
performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of
variable consideration to include in the transaction price and
allocating the transaction price to each separate performance
obligation. ASU 2014-09 is effective for us in our first quarter of
fiscal 2018 using either of two methods: (i) retrospective to each
prior reporting period presented with the option to elect certain
practical expedients as defined within ASU 2014-09; or (ii)
retrospective with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU
2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application and providing
certain additional disclosures as defined per ASU
2014-09.
The
Company will adopt ASU 2014-09, effective the first day of our
fiscal year 2018, using the modified retrospective transition
method. Under this method, the Company could elect to apply the
cumulative effect method to either all contracts as of the date of
initial application or only to contracts that are not complete as
of that date. The Company elected to apply the modified
retrospective method to contracts that are not complete as of
December 31, 2017. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 to
have a material impact on our financial statements.
Inventories: Inventories are comprised of raw materials,
work-in-process and finished goods. They are stated at the lower of
cost, determined by the first-in, first-out method, or market. The
inventory on the balance sheet is reflected net of valuation
allowances. Labor and overhead has been added to inventory that was
manufactured or characterized by the Company.
The
Company regularly reviews inventories on hand and reduces the
carrying value for slow-moving and obsolete inventory, inventory
not meeting quality standards and inventory subject to expiration.
The reduction of the carrying value for slow-moving and obsolete
inventory is based on current estimates of future product demand,
market conditions and related management judgment. Any significant
unanticipated changes in future product demand or market conditions
that vary from current expectations could have an impact on the
value of inventories.
Share-based compensation: Under the Company's 2017 Equity
Incentive Plan, as amended, the Board of Directors may grant
restricted stock or stock options to employees and non-employees.
For employees, share-based compensation cost is recorded for all
option grants and awards of non-vested stock based on the grant
date fair value of the award, and is recognized over the period the
employee is required to provide services for the award. For
non-employees, share-based compensation cost is recorded for all
option grants and awards of non-vested stock and is remeasured over
the vesting term as earned. The expense is recognized over the
period the non-employee is required to provide services for the
award.
The
Company recognizes compensation expense over the requisite service
period using the straight-line method for option grants without
performance conditions. For stock options that have both service
and performance conditions, the Company recognizes compensation
expense using the graded attribution method. Compensation expense
for stock options with performance conditions is recognized only
for those awards expected to vest.
From
time to time, the Company awards shares of its common stock to
non-employees for services provided or to be provided. The fair
value of the awards are measured either based on the fair market
value of stock at the date of grant or the value of the services
provided, based on which is more reliably measurable. Since these
stock awards are fully vested and non-forfeitable, upon issuance
the measurement date for the award is usually reached on the date
of the award.
Interest Rate Risk
We may
become exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates
in connection with our credit facility with Western Alliance. As of
December 30, 2017, we did not have an outstanding loan payable
balance, however, we established a formula based revolving credit
line with Western Alliance Bank, pursuant to which we may borrow an
aggregate principal amount of up to $5,000,000, subject to certain
terms and conditions. If we decide to borrow from this credit line,
the interest rate will be calculated at a floating rate per month
equal to the greater of 3.50% per year or the Prime Rate published
in the Money Rates section of the Western Edition of The Wall
Street Journal, or such other rate of interest publicly announced
by Lender as its Prime Rate, plus 2.50 percentage points, plus an
additional 5.00 percentage points during any period that an event
of default has occurred and is continuing. If the Prime Rate rises,
we will incur more interest expenses. Any borrowing, interest or
other fees or obligations that we owe Western Alliance will become
due and payable on November 4, 2018.
Our
capital lease obligations bear interest at a fixed rate and
therefore have no exposure to changes in interest
rates.
The
Company’s cash consists of short term, highly liquid
investments in money market funds managed by banks. Due to the
short-term duration of our investment portfolio and the relatively
low risk profile of our investments, a sudden change in interest
rates would not have a material effect on either the fair market
value of our portfolio, our operating results or our cash
flows.
Foreign Currency Risk
All of
our long-lived assets are located within the United States and we
do not hold any foreign currency denominated financial instruments.
Our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars and we
collect in U.S. dollars.
Effects of Inflation
We do
not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our results
of operations or financial condition during the periods
presented.
Item
8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary
Data
|
The
financial statements are set forth in the pages listed
below.
|
Page
|
54
|
|
56
|
|
57
|
|
58
|
|
59
|
|
60
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
ChromaDex Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
ChromaDex Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”)
as of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 30 2017, and the
related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial
statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the Company as of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 30, 2017, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the
Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December
30, 2017, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) in 2013 and our report dated March 15,
2018, expressed an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public
accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S.
federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those
risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
Marcum
llp
/s/ Marcum LLP
We have
served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.
New
York, NY
March
15, 2018
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
To the
Shareholders and Board of Directors of
ChromaDex
Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have
audited ChromaDex Corporation's (the “Company”)
internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2017,
based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 30, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission.
We have
also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets as of
December 30, 2017 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the
years then ended of the Company and our report dated March 15,
2018 expressed an
unqualified opinion on
those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The
Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying “Management Annual Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting”. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a
public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required
to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with
the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness
exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our
audit also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of the inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/
Marcum LLP
Marcum
llp
New
York, NY
March
15, 2018
ChromaDex
Corporation and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
December
30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
Cash
|
$45,388,848
|
$1,642,429
|
Trade receivables,
net of allowance of $0.7 million and $1.1 million,
repectively;
|
|
|
Receivables from
Related Party: $1.0 million and $0, respectively
|
5,337,868
|
5,852,030
|
Inventories
|
5,796,281
|
7,912,630
|
Prepaid expenses
and other assets
|
655,321
|
311,539
|
Current assets held
for sale
|
-
|
18,315
|
Total
current assets
|
57,178,318
|
15,736,943
|
|
|
|
Leasehold
Improvements and Equipment, net
|
2,871,886
|
1,778,171
|
Deposits
|
271,631
|
377,532
|
Receivable held at
escrow
|
750,358
|
-
|
Intangible assets,
net
|
1,651,407
|
486,226
|
Long-term
investment, related party
|
-
|
20,318
|
Noncurrent assets
held for sale
|
-
|
1,352,878
|
Total
assets
|
$62,723,600
|
$19,752,068
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$3,718,407
|
$5,978,288
|
Accrued
expenses
|
3,645,355
|
2,170,172
|
Current maturities
of capital lease obligations
|
195,533
|
255,461
|
Customer deposits
and other
|
314,335
|
389,010
|
Deferred rent,
current
|
114,304
|
76,219
|
Due to
officer
|
100,000
|
-
|
Total
current liabilities
|
8,087,934
|
8,869,150
|
|
|
|
Capital lease
obligations, less current maturities
|
310,089
|
343,589
|
Deferred rent, less
current
|
491,909
|
380,205
|
Noncurrent
liabilities held for sale
|
-
|
184,766
|
Total
liabilities
|
8,889,932
|
9,777,710
|
|
|
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
Equity
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001
par value; authorized 150,000,000 shares;
|
|
|
issued
and outstanding 2017 54,696,741 shares and 2016 37,544,531
shares
|
54,697
|
37,545
|
Additional paid-in
capital
|
110,380,163
|
55,160,387
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(56,601,192)
|
(45,223,574)
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
53,833,668
|
9,974,358
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$62,723,600
|
$19,752,068
|
|
|
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
ChromaDex
Corporation and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
Years
Ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Sales,
net
|
$21,201,482
|
$21,664,648
|
$17,884,886
|
Cost of
sales
|
10,724,177
|
11,274,114
|
10,350,281
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
10,477,305
|
10,390,534
|
7,534,605
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
Sales and
marketing
|
4,459,224
|
1,558,213
|
1,507,868
|
Research and
development
|
4,007,381
|
2,522,768
|
891,601
|
General and
administrative
|
17,641,889
|
9,214,763
|
7,201,231
|
Other
|
745,773
|
-
|
-
|
Operating
expenses
|
26,854,267
|
13,295,744
|
9,600,700
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss
|
(16,376,962)
|
(2,905,210)
|
(2,066,095)
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating income
(expense):
|
|
|
|
Interest expense,
net
|
(152,784)
|
(333,286)
|
(566,917)
|
Loss on debt
extinguishment
|
-
|
(313,099)
|
-
|
Nonoperating
expenses
|
(152,784)
|
(646,385)
|
(566,917)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income
taxes
|
(16,529,746)
|
(3,551,595)
|
(2,633,012)
|
Provision for
income taxes
|
-
|
-
|
(4,527)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(16,529,746)
|
(3,551,595)
|
(2,637,539)
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations
|
(315,140)
|
623,410
|
(133,528)
|
Gain on sale of
discontinued operations
|
5,467,268
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net
|
5,152,128
|
623,410
|
(133,528)
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(11,377,618)
|
$(2,928,185)
|
$(2,771,067)
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
$(0.37)
|
$(0.10)
|
$(0.07)
|
Earnings
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
$0.11
|
$0.02
|
$(0.01)
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
loss per common share
|
$(0.26)
|
$(0.08)
|
$(0.08)
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
weighted average common shares outstanding
|
44,598,879
|
37,294,321
|
35,877,341
|
|
|
|
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
ChromaDex
Corporation and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
Ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2,
2016
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
|
Accumulated
|
Stockholders'
|
|
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Paid-in
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 3,
2015
|
35,090,352
|
35,090
|
43,487,623
|
(39,524,322)
|
3,998,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common
stock, net of
|
|
|
|
|
|
offering
costs of $25,000
|
533,334
|
534
|
1,974,359
|
-
|
1,974,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock
options
|
40,236
|
40
|
94,806
|
-
|
94,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested restricted
stock
|
228,000
|
228
|
(228)
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based
compensation
|
111,667
|
112
|
1,977,499
|
-
|
1,977,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,771,067)
|
(2,771,067)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 2,
2016
|
36,003,589
|
36,004
|
47,534,059
|
(42,295,389)
|
5,274,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 for 3 reverse
stock split, isssuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
due to
fractional shares round up
|
1,632
|
2
|
(2)
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common
stock, net of
|
|
|
|
|
|
offering
costs of $33,000
|
1,245,227
|
1,245
|
5,716,230
|
-
|
5,717,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock
options
|
280,086
|
280
|
716,332
|
-
|
716,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested restricted
stock
|
13,997
|
14
|
(14)
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based
compensation
|
-
|
-
|
1,193,782
|
-
|
1,193,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,928,185)
|
(2,928,185)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2016
|
37,544,531
|
$37,545
|
$55,160,387
|
$(45,223,574)
|
$9,974,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common
stock, net of
|
|
|
|
|
|
offering
costs of $1,420,000
|
15,592,788
|
15,593
|
47,578,626
|
-
|
47,594,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock
options
|
884,754
|
885
|
3,037,075
|
-
|
3,037,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested restricted
stock
|
674,668
|
674
|
(674)
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based
compensation
|
|
|
4,604,749
|
-
|
4,604,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(11,377,618)
|
(11,377,618)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 30, 2017
|
54,696,741
|
$54,697
|
$110,380,163
|
$(56,601,192)
|
$53,833,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChromaDex
Corporation and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
Years
Ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(11,377,618)
|
$(2,928,185)
|
$(2,771,067)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
of leasehold improvements and equipment
|
509,933
|
331,734
|
285,536
|
Amortization
of intangibles
|
206,208
|
87,826
|
45,014
|
Share-based
compensation expense
|
4,604,749
|
1,193,782
|
1,977,611
|
Allowance
for doubtful trade receivables
|
(411,475)
|
713,122
|
329,844
|
Gain from disposal of assets
|
(5,467,268)
|
-
|
-
|
Loss
from disposal of equipment
|
4,649
|
7,114
|
19,643
|
Loss
from impairment of intangibles
|
-
|
-
|
19,495
|
Loss
on debt extinguishment
|
-
|
313,099
|
-
|
Non-cash
financing costs
|
120,759
|
110,161
|
188,442
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
937,093
|
(4,114,561)
|
(873,726)
|
Inventories
|
2,177,263
|
240,851
|
(4,439,458)
|
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
(296,312)
|
(133,855)
|
(82,124)
|
Accounts
payable
|
(2,363,653)
|
(245,670)
|
2,772,350
|
Accrued
expenses
|
1,471,976
|
867,307
|
449,180
|
Customer
deposits and other
|
(67,855)
|
117,008
|
37,567
|
Deferred
rent
|
179,873
|
503,671
|
(69,445)
|
Due
to officer
|
(32,500)
|
-
|
-
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(9,804,178)
|
(2,936,596)
|
(2,111,138)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from disposal of assets, net of transaction costs
|
5,953,390
|
-
|
-
|
Purchases
of leasehold improvements and equipment
|
(1,167,506)
|
(1,504,922)
|
(525,231)
|
Purchases
of intangible assets
|
(183,958)
|
(220,000)
|
(122,500)
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
4,601,926
|
(1,724,922)
|
(647,731)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
|
46,594,216
|
5,717,474
|
1,974,893
|
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
3,037,960
|
716,612
|
94,846
|
Proceeds
from loan payable
|
-
|
-
|
2,500,000
|
Payment
of debt issuance costs
|
(75,178)
|
(176,836)
|
(15,000)
|
Principal
payment on loan payable
|
-
|
(5,000,000)
|
-
|
Cash
paid for debt extinguishment costs
|
-
|
(281,092)
|
-
|
Principal
payments on capital leases
|
(608,327)
|
(221,883)
|
(210,948)
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
48,948,671
|
754,275
|
4,343,791
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase
(decrease) in cash
|
43,746,419
|
(3,907,243)
|
1,584,922
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Beginning of
Year
|
1,642,429
|
5,549,672
|
3,964,750
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Ending of
Year
|
$45,388,848
|
$1,642,429
|
$5,549,672
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
Cash
payments for interest
|
$57,024
|
$261,738
|
$427,591
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Schedule of Noncash Investing Activity
|
|
|
|
Noncash
consideration transferred for the acquisition of Healthspan
Research LLC
|
$1,187,430
|
$-
|
$-
|
Capital
lease obligation incurred for the purchase of
equipment
|
$514,899
|
$156,655
|
$303,933
|
Receivable
from disposal of assets held at escrow
|
$750,000
|
$-
|
$-
|
Inventory
supplied to Healthspan Research, LLC for equity interest, at
cost
|
$-
|
$20,318
|
$-
|
Retirement
of fully depreciated equipment - cost
|
$57,424
|
$90,803
|
$121,213
|
Retirement
of fully depreciated equipment - accumulated
depreciation
|
$(57,424)
|
$(90,803)
|
$(121,213)
|
|
|
|
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
Nature of business: ChromaDex Corporation and its wholly
owned subsidiaries, ChromaDex, Inc., Healthspan Research, LLC and
ChromaDex Analytics, Inc. (collectively, the “Company”
or, in the first person as “we” “us” and
“our”) are an integrated, global nutraceutical company
devoted to improving the way people age. The Company's scientists
partner with leading universities and research institutions
worldwide to uncover the full potential of NAD and identify and
develop novel, science-based ingredients. Its flagship ingredient,
NIAGEN® nicotinamide riboside, sold directly to consumers as
TRU NIAGEN®, is backed with clinical and scientific research,
as well as intellectual property protection. The Company also has
core standards and contract services segment, which focuses on
natural product fine chemicals (known as
“phytochemicals”), chemistry services, and regulatory
consulting.
Liquidity: The Company has incurred a loss from continuing
operations of approximately $16.5 million and a net loss of
approximately $11.4 million for the year ended December 30, 2017,
and net losses of approximately $2.9 million and $2.8 million for
the years ended December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016,
respectively. As of December 30, 2017, the cash and cash
equivalents totaled approximately $45.4 million.
The
Company anticipates that its current cash, cash equivalents and
cash to be generated from operations will be sufficient to meet its
projected operating plans through at least March 16, 2019. The
Company may, however, seek additional capital prior to March 16,
2019, both to meet its projected operating plans after March 16,
2019 and/or to fund its longer term strategic
objectives.
Note
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies
|
Significant
accounting policies are as follows:
Basis of presentation: The financial statements and
accompanying notes have been prepared on a consolidated basis and
reflect the consolidated financial position of the Company and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated from these financial
statements. The Company's fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 ended on
the Saturday closest to December 31.
Change in Fiscal Year: On January 25, 2018, the Board of
Directors of ChromaDex Corporation approved a resolution to change
the Company’s fiscal year from a 52/53-week fiscal year that
ends on the Saturday closest to December 31 to a calendar year. As
such, the Company’s 2018 fiscal year will be extended from
December 29, 2018 to December 31, 2018, with subsequent fiscal
years beginning on January 1 and ending on December 31 of each
year. Effective fiscal year 2018, the Company’s quarterly
results will be for the periods ending March 31, June 30, September
30 and December 31.
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements Fiscal 2017: In January
2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-01,
Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a
Business. The ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business
with the objective of adding guidance to assist companies and other
reporting organizations with evaluating whether transactions should
be accounted for as acquisitions of assets or businesses. The
Company early adopted the amendments in this ASU effective as of
January 1, 2017. On March 12, 2017, the Company acquired all the
outstanding equity interests of Healthspan Research, LLC
("Healthspan") pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement
by and among (i) Robert Fried, Jeffrey Allen and Dr. Charles
Brenner (the “Sellers”) and (ii) ChromaDex Corporation.
Under ASU 2017-01, this transaction was treated as an acquisition
of assets, rather than a business.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock
Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based
Payment Accounting to simplify the accounting for stock
compensation. It focuses on income tax accounting, award
classification, estimating forfeitures, and cash flow presentation.
The Company adopted the amendments in this ASU effective as of
January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a
material effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
In July
2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330) -
Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which requires that
inventories, other than those accounted for under
Last-In-First-Out, will be reported at the lower of cost or net
realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling
price less costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The
Company adopted the amendments in this ASU effective as of January
1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2015-11 did not have a material effect
on our consolidated financial statements.
Use of accounting estimates: The preparation of financial
statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Revenue recognition: The Company recognizes sales and the
related cost of sales at the time the merchandise is shipped to
customers or service is performed, when each of the following
conditions have been met: an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred, there is a fixed price, and collectability is reasonably
assured. Discounts, returns and allowances related to sales,
including an estimated reserve for the returns and allowances, are
recorded as reduction of revenue.
Shipping
and handling fees billed to customers and the cost of shipping and
handling fees billed to customers are included in net sales.
Shipping and handling fees billed to customers and the cost of
shipping and handling fees billed to customers for the years ending
December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 are as
follows:
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
Shipping and
handling fees billed
|
$137,000
|
$110,000
|
$113,000
|
Cost of shipping
and handling fees billed
|
$185,000
|
$108,000
|
$112,000
|
Shipping
and handling fees not billed to customers are recognized as cost of
sales.
Taxes
collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities
are excluded from revenue, which is presented on a net basis in the
statement of operations.
Cash concentration: The Company maintains its cash in one
bank.
Trade accounts receivable, net: Trade accounts receivable
are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for
doubtful receivables based on monthly and quarterly reviews of all
outstanding amounts. Management determines the allowance for
doubtful accounts by identifying troubled accounts and by using
historical experience applied to an aging of accounts. The
allowance amounts for the periods ended December 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016 are as follows:
|
2017
|
2016
|
Allowances Related
to
|
|
|
Customer
C
|
$500,000
|
$800,000
|
Customer
E
|
-
|
198,000
|
Other
Allowances
|
169,000
|
83,000
|
|
$669,000
|
$1,081,000
|
Trade
accounts receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible.
Recoveries of trade accounts receivable previously written off are
recorded when received.
Credit risk: Financial instruments that potentially subject
us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and
cash equivalents and trade receivables. For cash and cash
equivalents, the Company has them either in a form of bank deposits
or highly liquid debt instruments in investment-grade pursuant to
the Company's investment policy. Accounts at each institution are
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to
$250,000. As of December 30, 2017, we held a total deposit of
approximately $45.4 million with one institution which exceeded the
FDIC limit. We, however, believe we have very little credit risk
exposure for our cash and cash equivalents. Our trade receivables
are derived from sales to our customers. We assess credit risk of
our customers through quantitative and qualitative analysis. From
this analysis, we establish credit limits and manage the risk
exposure. We, however, incur credit losses due to bankruptcy or
other failure of the customer to pay.
Inventories: Inventories are comprised of primarily finished
goods. They are stated at the lower of cost, determined by the
first-in, first-out method, or net realizable value. The inventory
on the balance sheet is recorded net of valuation allowances. Labor
and overhead has been added to inventory that was manufactured or
characterized by the Company. The amounts of major classes of
inventory for the periods ended December 30, 2017 and December 31,
2016 are as follows:
|
2017
|
2016
|
Bulk
ingredients
|
$4,159,000
|
$7,044,000
|
Reference
standards
|
1,027,000
|
1,033,000
|
Consumer Products -
Finished Goods
|
503,000
|
-
|
Consumer Products -
Work in Process
|
249,000
|
-
|
|
5,938,000
|
8,077,000
|
Less valuation
allowance
|
142,000
|
164,000
|
|
$5,796,000
|
$7,913,000
|
Our
normal operating cycle for reference standards is currently longer
than one year. The Company regularly reviews inventories on hand
and reduces the carrying value for slow-moving and obsolete
inventory, inventory not meeting quality standards and inventory
subject to expiration. The reduction of the carrying value for
slow-moving and obsolete inventory is based on current estimates of
future product demand, market conditions and related management
judgment. Any significant unanticipated changes in future product
demand or market conditions that vary from current expectations
could have an impact on the value of inventories.
Intangible assets: Intangible assets include licensing
rights and are accounted for based on the fair value of
consideration given or the fair value of the net assets acquired,
whichever is more reliable. Intangible assets with finite useful
lives are amortized using the straight-line method over a period of
10 years, or, for licensed patent rights, the remaining term
of the patents underlying licensing rights (considered to be the
remaining useful life of the license), whichever is shorter. The
useful lives of subsequent milestone payments that are capitalized
are the remaining useful life of the initial licensing payment that
was capitalized.
Leasehold improvements and equipment, net: Leasehold
improvements and equipment are carried at cost and depreciated on
the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated useful
life of each asset or lease term. Leasehold improvements and
equipment are comprised of leasehold improvements, laboratory
equipment, furniture and fixtures, and computer equipment.
Depreciation on equipment under capital lease is included with
depreciation on owned assets. Maintenance and repairs are charged
to operating expenses as they are incurred. Improvements and
betterments, which extend the lives of the assets, are
capitalized.
Long-lived
assets are reviewed for impairment on a periodic basis and when
changes in circumstances indicate the possibility that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets are grouped at the
lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely
independent of the cash flows of other assets. If the forecast of
undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of
the assets, an impairment charge would be recognized to reduce the
carrying value of the assets to fair value. If a possible
impairment is identified, the asset group’s fair value is
measured relying primarily on a discounted cash flow
methodology.
Customer deposits and other: Customer deposits and other
represent cash received from customers in advance of product
shipment or delivery of services.
Income taxes:
Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred
tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred
liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences.
Temporary differences are the differences between the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax
assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of
management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws
and rates on the date of enactment.
The
Company has not recorded a reserve for any tax positions for which
the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is
uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. The Company
files tax returns in all appropriate jurisdictions, which include a
federal tax return and various state tax returns. Open tax years
for these jurisdictions are 2014 to 2017, which statutes expire in
2018 to 2021, respectively. When and if applicable, potential
interest and penalty costs are accrued as incurred, with expenses
recognized in general and administrative expenses in the statements
of operations. As of December 30, 2017, the Company has no
liability for unrecognized tax benefits.
Research and development costs: Research and development
costs consist of direct and indirect costs associated with the
development of the Company’s technologies. These costs are
expensed as incurred.
Advertising: The Company expenses the production costs of
advertising the first time the advertising takes place.
Advertising expense for the periods ended December 30, 2017,
December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 were approximately
$1,914,000, $58,000 and $104,000, respectively.
Share-based compensation: The Company has an Equity
Incentive Plan under which the Board of Directors may grant
restricted stock or stock options to employees and non-employees.
For employees, share-based compensation cost is recorded for all
option grants and awards of non-vested stock based on the grant
date fair value of the award, and is recognized over the period the
employee is required to provide services for the award. For
non-employees, share-based compensation cost is recorded for all
option grants and awards of non-vested stock and is remeasured over
the vesting term as earned. The expense is recognized over the
period the non-employee is required to provide services for the
award.
The
fair value of the Company’s stock options is estimated at the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes based option valuation model.
The volatility assumption is based on the historical volatility of
the Company's common stock. The dividend yield assumption is based
on the Company’s history and expectation of future dividend
payouts on the common stock. The risk-free interest rate is based
on the implied yield available on U.S. treasury zero-coupon issues
with an equivalent remaining term. For the expected term, the
Company uses SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 simplified
method since most of the options granted were “plain
vanilla” options with following characteristics: (i) the
share options are granted at the market price on the grant date;
(ii) exercisability is conditional on performing service through
the vesting date on most options; (iii) if an employee terminates
service prior to vesting, the employee would forfeit the share
options; (iv) if an employee terminates service after vesting, the
employee would have 30 to 90 days to exercise the share options;
and (v) the share options are nontransferable and
nonhedgeable.
Market
conditions that affect vesting of stock options are considered in
the grant-date fair value. The issues surrounding the valuation for
such awards can be complex and consideration needs to be given for
how the market condition should be incorporated into the valuation
of the award. The Company considers using other valuation
techniques, such as Monte Carlo simulations based on a lattice
approach, to value awards with market conditions.
The
Company recognizes compensation expense over the requisite service
period using the straight-line method for option grants without
performance conditions. For stock options that have both service
and performance conditions, the Company recognizes compensation
expense using the graded attribution method. Compensation expense
for stock options with performance conditions is recognized only
for those awards expected to vest.
Effective
January 1, 2017, the Company made an election to recognize
forfeitures when they occur as a result of the adoption of ASU
2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718):
Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting to simplify
the accounting for stock compensation.
From
time to time, the Company awards shares of its common stock to
non-employees for services provided or to be provided. The fair
value of the awards are measured either based on the fair market
value of stock at the date of grant or the value of the services
provided, based on which is more reliably measureable. Since these
stock awards are fully vested and non-forfeitable, upon issuance
the measurement date for the award is usually reached on the date
of the award.
Fair Value Measurement: The Company follows the provisions
of the accounting standard which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and enhances fair value
measurement disclosure. Under these provisions, fair value is
defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”)
in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date.
The
standard establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair
value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the
use on unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable
inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability
developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of
the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the
Company’s assumptions about the assumptions market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed
based on the best information available in the circumstances. The
hierarchy is described below:
Level
1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible
at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value
hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1
inputs.
Level
2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active
markets, but corroborated by market data.
Level
3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is
available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to
Level 3 inputs.
Financial instruments: The estimated fair value of financial
instruments has been determined based on the Company’s
assessment of available market information and appropriate
valuation methodologies. The fair value of the Company’s
financial instruments that are included in current assets and
current liabilities approximates their carrying value due to their
short-term nature.
The
carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for capital lease
obligations are present values of the obligations, excluding the
interest portion.
Recent accounting standards: In May 2014, the FASB issued
Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts
with Customers: Topic 606 (ASU 2014-09), to supersede nearly all
existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles ("GAAP"). The core principle of ASU 2014-09
is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are
transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or
services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this
core principle and, in doing so, it is possible more judgment and
estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process
than required under existing U.S. GAAP including identifying
performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of
variable consideration to include in the transaction price and
allocating the transaction price to each separate performance
obligation. ASU 2014-09 is effective for us in our first quarter of
fiscal 2018 using either of two methods: (i) retrospective to each
prior reporting period presented with the option to elect certain
practical expedients as defined within ASU 2014-09; or (ii)
retrospective with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU
2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application and providing
certain additional disclosures as defined per ASU
2014-09.
The
Company will adopt ASU 2014-09, effective the first day of our
fiscal year 2018, using the modified retrospective transition
method. Under this method, the Company could elect to apply the
cumulative effect method to either all contracts as of the date of
initial application or only to contracts that are not complete as
of that date. The Company elected to apply the modified
retrospective method to contracts that are not complete as of the
first day of our fiscal year 2018. In 2017, approximately $19.7
million of the Company's total revenue of $21.2 million, or 93% of
the total revenue, was as a result of shipping physical goods to
the customers. For such revenue streams which we ship physical
goods, we believe that there will be a minimal impact compared to
our current accounting policies as the duration of the contract
term is short and it ends when control of the goods transfers to
the customer. We also have a revenue stream which we provide
regulatory consulting services to our clients. In 2017, our revenue
from this stream was approximately $0.7 million, or 3% of the total
revenue. For some of these services, we are currently recognizing
revenue based on achievements of milestones as prescribed in the
contracts with the customers. ASU 2014-09 states that an entity
should recognize revenue over time by measuring the progress toward
complete satisfaction of the performance obligation. This revenue
stream will be impacted by the adoption of ASU
2014-09.
We have
begun the implementation process of adopting ASU 2014-09 and we do
not believe there are any significant implementation matters that
have not yet been addressed. We do not expect the adoption of ASU
2014-09 to have a material impact on our financial
statements.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU
2016-02 requires that a lessee recognize the assets and liabilities
that arise from operating leases. A lessee should recognize in the
statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments
(the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its
right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For leases
with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an
accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to
recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. In transition,
lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at
the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified
retrospective approach. Public business entities should apply the
amendments in ASU 2016-02 for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
Early application is permitted for all public business entities and
all nonpublic business entities upon issuance. We are currently
evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our
consolidated financial statements.
Note
3.
|
Loss
Per Share Applicable to Common Stockholders
|
The
following table sets forth the computations of loss per share
amounts applicable to common stockholders for the years ended
December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2,
2016.
|
Years
Ended
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(11,377,618)
|
$(2,928,185)
|
$(2,771,067)
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
loss per common share
|
$(0.26)
|
$(0.08)
|
$(0.08)
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
weighted average common shares outstanding (1):
|
44,598,879
|
37,294,321
|
35,877,341
|
|
|
|
|
Potentially
dilutive securities (2):
|
|
|
|
Stock
options
|
6,534,167
|
5,210,334
|
5,244,918
|
Warrants
|
470,444
|
470,444
|
423,007
|
Convertible
debt
|
-
|
-
|
257,798
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Includes approximately 0.5 million, 0.4 million and 0.4 million
nonvested restricted stock
|
|
||
for
the years 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are
participating securities that feature
|
|
||
voting
and dividend rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
Excluded from the computation of loss per share as their impact is
antidilutive.
|
|
|
Note
4.
|
Intangible
Assets
|
Intangible
assets consisted of the
following:
|
2017
|
2016
|
Weighted
Average
Total
Amortization
Period
|
|
|
|
|
Healthspan Research
LLC Acquisition (See Note 9)
|
$1,346,000
|
$-
|
10
years
|
License agreements
and other
|
1,494,000
|
1,469,000
|
9
years
|
Less accumulated
depreciation
|
(1,189,000)
|
(983,000)
|
|
|
$1,651,000
|
$486,000
|
|
Amortization expenses
on amortizable intangible assets included in the consolidated
statement of operations for the years ended December 30, 2017,
December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 were approximately $206,000,
$88,000 and $45,000, respectively.
Estimated
aggregate amortization expense for each of the next five
years is as follows:
Years ending
December:
|
|
2018
|
$233,000
|
2019
|
233,000
|
2020
|
228,000
|
2021
|
209,000
|
2022
|
171,000
|
Thereafter
|
577,000
|
|
$1,651,000
|
|
|
Note
5.
|
Leasehold
Improvements and Equipment, Net
|
Leasehold
improvements and equipment, net of assets held for
sale, consisted of the following:
|
2017
|
2016
|
Useful
Life
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory
equipment
|
$1,869,000
|
$1,142,000
|
10 years
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
1,699,000
|
1,332,000
|
Lesser of
lease term or
estimated useful
life
|
Computer
equipment
|
511,000
|
400,000
|
3 to 5 years
|
Furniture and
fixtures
|
90,000
|
41,000
|
7 years
|
Office
equipment
|
18,000
|
10,000
|
10 years
|
Construction in
progress
|
131,000
|
170,000
|
|
|
4,318,000
|
3,095,000
|
|
Less accumulated
depreciation
|
1,446,000
|
1,317,000
|
|
|
$2,872,000
|
$1,778,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
expenses on leasehold improvements and equipment included in the
consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December
30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 were approximately
$510,000, $332,000 and $286,000, respectively.
The
Company leases equipment under capitalized lease obligations with a
total cost of approximately $871,000 and $1,214,000 and accumulated
amortization of $126,000 and $277,000 as of December 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016, respectively.
Note
6.
|
Capitalized
Lease Obligations
|
Minimum
future lease payments
under capital leases as of December 30, 2017, are as
follows:
Year ending
December:
|
|
2018
|
$236,000
|
2019
|
196,000
|
2020
|
126,000
|
2021
|
18,000
|
Total minimum lease
payments
|
576,000
|
Less amount
representing interest at a rate of approximately 9.8% per
year
|
70,000
|
Present value of
net minimum lease payments
|
506,000
|
Less current
portion
|
196,000
|
Long-term
obligations under capital leases
|
$310,000
|
Interest
expenses related to capital leases were approximately $57,000,
$48,000 and $62,000 for the years ended December 30, 2017, December
31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, respectively.
Note
7.
|
Line
of Credit
|
On
November 4, 2016, the Company entered into a business financing
agreement (“Financing Agreement”) with Western Alliance
Bank (“Western Alliance”), in order to establish a
formula based revolving credit line pursuant to which the Company
may borrow an aggregate principal amount of up to $5,000,000,
subject to the terms and conditions of the Financing Agreement. As
of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company did not
have any outstanding loan payable from this line of credit
arrangement.
The
interest rate will be calculated at a floating rate per month equal
to (a) the greater of (i) 3.50% per year or (ii) the Prime Rate
published in the Money Rates section of the Western Edition of The
Wall Street Journal, or such other rate of interest publicly
announced by Lender as its Prime Rate, plus (b) 2.50 percentage
points, plus an additional 5.00 percentage points during any period
that an event of default has occurred and is continuing. The
Company’s obligations under the Financing Agreement are
secured by a security interest in substantially all of the
Company’s current and future personal property assets,
including intellectual property. Any borrowings, interest or other
fees or obligations that the Company owes Western Alliance pursuant
to the Financing Agreement will be become due and payable on
November 4, 2018.
Debt Issuance Costs
The
Company incurred debt issuance costs of approximately $252,000 in
connection with this line of credit arrangement and had an
unamortized balance of approximately $115,000 as of December 30,
2017. For the line of credit arrangement, the Company has elected a
policy to keep the debt issuance costs as an asset, regardless of
whether an amount is drawn. The remaining unamortized deferred
asset will be amortized over the remaining life of the line of
credit arrangement.
Note
8.
|
Income
Taxes
|
The
provision for income tax consists of following:
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
Current
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
State
|
-
|
-
|
4,527
|
Deferred (net of
valuation allowance)
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
State
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Income tax
provision
|
$-
|
$-
|
$4,527
|
|
|
|
|
At
December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company maintained a
full valuation allowance against the entire deferred income tax
balance which resulted in an effective tax rates of 0%, 0% and 0.2%
for years 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. At December 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016, we recorded a valuation allowance of $12.9
million and $15.5 million, respectively. The valuation allowance
decreased by $2.6 million during 2017.
A
reconciliation of income taxes computed at the
statutory Federal income tax rate to income taxes as reflected in
the financial statements is summarized as follows:
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax
expense at statutory rate
|
(34.0)%
|
(34.0)%
|
(34.0)%
|
State income tax,
net of federal benefit
|
(5.3)%
|
(5.3)%
|
(5.1)%
|
Permanent
differences
|
7.6%
|
8.4%
|
5.7%
|
Change in tax
rates
|
0%
|
(0.3)%
|
0.7%
|
Changes of state
net operating losses
|
1.3%
|
1.8%
|
17.4%
|
Change in stock
options and restricted stock
|
(1.3)%
|
11.8%
|
0.0%
|
Change in valuation
allowance
|
(23.1)%
|
16.4%
|
13.7%
|
Remeasurement of
deferred taxes asset / liability
|
53.4%
|
-
|
-
|
Other
|
1.4%
|
1.2%
|
1.8%
|
Effective tax
rate
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
0.2%
|
On
December 22, 2017, new legislation was signed into law, informally
titled the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which included, among other
things, a provision to reduce the federal corporate income tax rate
to 21%. Under ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, the enactment
of the Tax Act also requires companies, to recognize the effects of
changes in tax laws and rates on deferred tax assets and
liabilities and the retroactive effects of changes in tax laws in
the period in which the new legislation is enacted. There is no
further change to its assertion on maintaining a full valuation
allowance against its U.S. deferred tax assets. The Company’s
gross deferred tax assets have been revalued from 34% to 21% with a
corresponding offset to the valuation allowance and any potential
other taxes arising due to the Tax Act will result in reductions to
its net operating loss carryforward and valuation allowance.
Deferred tax assets of approximately $19.1 million have been
revalued to approximately $13.0 million with a corresponding
decrease to the Company’s valuation allowance. Upon
completion of our 2017 U.S. income tax return in 2018 we may
identify additional remeasurement adjustments to our recorded
deferred tax liabilities and the one-time transition tax. We will
continue to assess our provision for income taxes as future
guidance is issued, but do not currently anticipate significant
revisions will be necessary. Any such revisions will be treated in
accordance with the measurement period guidance outlined in Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 118.
The
deferred income tax
assets and liabilities consisted of the following components as of
December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
|
2017
|
2016
|
Deferred tax
assets:
|
|
|
Net operating loss
carryforward
|
$9,963,000
|
$11,023,000
|
Capital loss
carryforward
|
-
|
811,000
|
Stock options and
restricted stock
|
1,873,000
|
2,694,000
|
Inventory
reserve
|
143,000
|
195,000
|
Allowance for
doubtful accounts
|
183,000
|
425,000
|
Accrued
expenses
|
674,000
|
487,000
|
Deferred
revenue
|
19,000
|
13,000
|
Intangibles
|
27,000
|
29,000
|
Deferred
rent
|
166,000
|
252,000
|
|
13,048,000
|
15,929,000
|
Less valuation
allowance
|
(12,904,000)
|
(15,530,000)
|
|
144,000
|
399,000
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax
liabilities:
|
|
|
Leasehold
improvements and equipment
|
(9,000)
|
(282,000)
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
(135,000)
|
(117,000)
|
|
(144,000)
|
(399,000)
|
|
|
|
|
$-
|
$-
|
The
Company has tax net operating loss carryforwards for federal and
state income tax purposes of approximately $40.0 million and $29.6
million, respectively which begin to expire in the year ending
December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Under
the Internal Revenue Code, certain ownership changes may subject
the Company to annual limitations on the utilization of its net
operating loss carryforward. The Company has determined that the
stock issued in the year of 2017 did not create a change in control
under the Internal Revenue Code Section 382. The Company will
continue to analyze the potential impact of any additional
transactions undertaken upon the utilization of the net operating
losses on a go forward basis.
The
Company is currently not under examination by the Internal Revenue
Service or any other jurisdictions for any tax years. The Company
has not identified any uncertain tax positions requiring a reserve
as of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Note
9.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Asset acquisition
On
March 12, 2017, the Company acquired all of the outstanding equity
interests of Healthspan from Robert Fried, Jeffrey Allen and Dr.
Charles Brenner (the "Sellers"). Robert Fried is a member of the
Board of Directors ("Board") of the Company, a position he has held
since July 2015.
Upon
the closing of, and as consideration for, the acquisition, the
Company issued an aggregate of 367,648 shares of the
Company’s common stock to the Sellers. The fair value of
these shares was approximately $1.0 million based on the closing
price of $2.72 per share on March 12, 2017. Also on March 12, 2017,
the Company appointed Robert Fried as President and Chief Strategy
Officer, effective immediately. Mr. Fried continues to serve as a
member of the Board, but resigned as a member of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee of the Board.
Healthspan was formed in August 2015 to offer and sell finished
bottle product TRU NIAGEN® directly to consumers through
internet-based selling platforms. TRU NIAGEN® is currently the
Company's leading product. Prior to the acquisition, the Company
has supplied certain amount of NIAGEN® to Healthspan as a raw
material inventory in exchange for a 4% equity interest in
Healthspan. An additional 5% equity interest was received for
granting certain exclusive rights to resell NIAGEN® prior to
the total acquisition on March 12, 2017.
This
transaction was accounted for as an acquisition of assets. An
intangible asset of approximately $1.35 million was recorded as a
result of this acquisition, which is the difference of
consideration transferred and the net amount of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed.
(A) Consideration transferred
|
|
|
(B) Net amount of assets and liabilities
|
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
Assets acquired
|
Fair
value
|
Common
Stock
|
$1,000,000
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$19,000
|
Transaction
costs
|
178,000
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
11,000
|
Previously
held equity interest
|
20,000
|
|
Inventory
|
61,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,198,000
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
Due
to officer
|
(132,000)
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
(74,000)
|
|
|
|
Credit
card payable
|
(30,000)
|
|
|
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
(3,000)
|
Consumer product business model,
|
|
|
|
|
intangible asset (A) -(B)
|
$1,346,000
|
|
Net assets
|
$(148,000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
acquired intangible asset is considered to have a useful life of 10
years. The expense is amortized using the straight-line method over
the useful life and the Company recognized an amortization expense
of approximately $109,000 for the year ended December 30,
2017.
In cancellation of a loan owed by Healthspan to Mr. Fried prior to
the acquisition, the Company repaid $32,500 to Mr. Fried on March
13, 2017 and also repaid $100,000 on March 9, 2018. No interest was
paid for the $100,000 repaid on March 9, 2018.
Sale of consumer products,
related party
During
July 2017, the Company entered into an exclusivity agreement (the
"Customer G Agreement") with Customer G, whereby the Company agreed
to exclusively sell its TRU NIAGEN® dietary supplement product
to Customer G in certain territories in Asia. During the year ended
December 30, 2017, the Company sold approximately $4.1 million of
TRU NIAGEN® dietary supplement product pursuant to the
Customer G Agreement. As of December 30, 2017, the trade receivable
from Customer G was approximately $1.0 million.
Li Ka
Shing, who beneficially owns more than 10% of the Company's common
stock, beneficially owns approximately 30% of Entity A and Entity A
beneficially owns approximately 75% of Customer G. In accordance
with the Company's Related-Person Transactions Policy, the Audit
Committee of the Company's Board of Directors ratified the terms of
sales agreement with Customer G.
Note
10.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
On
September 5, 2017, the Company completed the sale of its operating
assets that were used with the Company's quality verification
program testing and analytical chemistry business for food and food
related products (the "Lab Business") to Covance Laboratories Inc.
("Covance"). In consideration of the Lab Business sale, the Company
received $6.75 million from Covance and additional cash
consideration of $0.8 million is currently held in escrow to
satisfy any potential indemnification claims by Covance. The
Company was also eligible to receive an additional earnout payment
from Covance in an amount equal to up to $1.0 million, tied to 2017
revenue of the Lab Business. However, 2017 revenue of the Lab
Business came up short of the required threshold and this
contingent consideration was not earned.
The
Company recorded a gain of approximately $5.5 million from the
disposal.
(A) Consideration received
|
|
|
|
(C) Carrying value of the Lab Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Assets disposed
|
Carrying
value
|
Cash
payment
|
$6,750,000
|
|
|
Leasehold
improvements and equipment, net
|
$1,427,000
|
Cash
payment held in escrow (1)
|
750,000
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
11,000
|
Additional
earnout payment
|
-
|
|
|
Deposits
|
20,000
|
|
$7,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
disposed
|
|
(B) Selling costs
|
|
|
|
Deferred
revenue
|
(7,000)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Deferred
rent
|
(215,000)
|
Legal
|
$428,000
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
consulting
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
118,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
$796,000
|
|
|
Net assets
|
$1,236,000
|
Gain from disposal (A) - (B) - (C)
|
$5,468,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) $750,000 is expected to be held in escrow until March 2019 to
satisfy any indemnification claims.
|
The
sale of the Lab Business qualifies as a discontinued operation as
the sale represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a
major effect on operations and financial results.
The
results of operations from the discontinued operations for the
years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2,
2016 are as follows:
Statements
of Operations - Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
Years
Ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2,
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
$2,820,631
|
$5,146,438
|
$4,129,254
|
Cost of
sales
|
2,478,827
|
3,615,840
|
3,182,851
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
341,804
|
1,530,598
|
946,403
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
Sales and
marketing
|
482,134
|
692,376
|
818,920
|
General and
administrative
|
150,171
|
178,446
|
215,220
|
Operating
expenses
|
632,305
|
870,822
|
1,034,140
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
(290,501)
|
659,776
|
(87,737)
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating income
(expense):
|
|
|
|
Interest expense,
net
|
(24,639)
|
(36,366)
|
(45,791)
|
Nonoperating
expenses
|
(24,639)
|
(36,366)
|
(45,791)
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
$(315,140)
|
$623,410
|
$(133,528)
|
The
assets and liabilities that are classified as held for sale as of
December 31, 2016 are as follows:
|
Dec.
31, 2016
|
Current assets held
for sale
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
$18,315
|
|
|
Leasehold
Improvements and Equipment, net
|
1,333,203
|
Deposits
|
19,675
|
|
|
Total assets held
for sale
|
1,371,193
|
|
|
Deferred
rent
|
184,766
|
|
|
Total liabilities
held for sale
|
$184,766
|
Depreciation,
capital expenditures and significant noncash investing activities
of the discontinued operations for the years ended December 30,
2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 are as
follows:
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
$169,250
|
$254,755
|
$234,010
|
Purchase of
leasehod improvements and equipment
|
$111,232
|
$313,842
|
$190,632
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing
activity
|
|
|
|
Capital
lease obligation incurred for the purchase of
equipment
|
$-
|
$156,655
|
$303,933
|
Retirement
of fully depreciated equipment - cost
|
$55,947
|
$76,050
|
$119,888
|
Retirement
of fully depreciated equipment - accumulated
depreciation
|
$(55,947)
|
$(76,050)
|
$(119,888)
|
Note
11.
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
11A. Employee Share-Based
Compensation
Stock Option Plans
At the
discretion of the Company’s compensation committee (the
“Compensation Committee”), and with the approval of the
Company’s board of directors (the “Board of
Directors”), the Company may grant options to purchase the
Company’s common stock to certain individuals from time to
time. Management and the Compensation Committee determine the terms
of awards which include the exercise price, vesting conditions and
expiration dates at the time of grant. Expiration dates for stock
options are not to exceed 10 years from their date of
issuance.
On June
20, 2017, the stockholders of the Company approved the ChromaDex
Corporation 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2017 Plan"). The 2017
Plan is intended to be the successor to the ChromaDex Corporation
Second Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2007
Plan"). Under the 2017 Plan, the Company is authorized to issue
stock options that total no more than the sum of (i) 3,000,000 new
shares, (ii) approximately 384,000 unallocated shares remaining
available for the grant of new awards under the 2007 Plan, and
(iii) any returned shares from the 2007 Plan or the 2017 Plan, such
as forfeited, cancelled, or expired shares.
Under
both 2007 Plan and 2017 Plan, the total number of shares the
Company may grant, excluding returned shares, was approximately
10.8 million shares. The remaining amount available for issuance
under the 2017 Plan totaled approximately 1.4 million shares at
December 30, 2017.
General Vesting Conditions
The
stock option awards generally vest ratably over a three to
four-year period following grant date after a passage of time.
However, some stock option awards are market or performance based
and vest based on certain triggering events established by the
Compensation Committee, subject to approval by the Board of
Directors.
The
fair value of the Company’s stock options that are not market
based was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
based option valuation model. The table below outlines the weighted
average assumptions for options granted to employees during the
years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2,
2016.
Year Ended
December
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
Expected
term
|
6
years
|
6
years
|
6
years
|
Volatility
|
72%
|
73%
|
76%
|
Dividend
Yield
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
Risk-free
rate
|
2%
|
1%
|
2%
|
1)
Service Period Based Stock Options
The
majority of options granted by the Company are comprised of service based options
granted to employees. These options vest ratably over a defined
period following grant date after a passage of a service
period.
The
following table summarizes service period based
stock options activity:
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
||
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Number
of
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Fair
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
|
Value
|
Value
|
Outstanding at
January 3, 2015
|
4,241,386
|
$3.39
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
Granted
|
730,562
|
3.66
|
10.00
|
$2.28
|
|
Options
Classification from Employee
to
Non-Employee
|
(514,024)
|
2.79
|
7.78
|
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
(40,236)
|
2.37
|
|
|
$58,000
|
Options
Forfeited
|
(103,425)
|
3.93
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
January 2, 2016
|
4,314,263
|
$3.50
|
6.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
Granted
|
742,485
|
3.91
|
10.00
|
$2.49
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
(238,423)
|
2.67
|
|
|
$502,000
|
Options
Expired
|
(183,334)
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
Options
Forfeited
|
(353,840)
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2016
|
4,281,151
|
$3.52
|
6.36
|
|
$1,352,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
Granted
|
1,110,404
|
3.25
|
10.00
|
$2.07
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
(863,712)
|
2.42
|
|
|
$2,455,000
|
Options
Expired
|
(3,334)
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
Options
Forfeited
|
(73,483)
|
3.88
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 30, 2017
|
4,451,026
|
$4.45
|
5.76
|
|
$10,740,000*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at
December 30, 2017
|
2,937,613
|
$3.54
|
5.18
|
|
$7,230,000*
|
*The
aggregate intrinsic
values in the table above are based on the Company’s closing
stock price of $5.88 on the last day of business for the year ended
December 30, 2017.
2)
Performance Based Stock Options
The
Company also grants stock option awards that are performance based
and vest based on the achievement of certain criteria established
from time to time by the Compensation Committee. If these
performance criteria are not met, the compensation expenses are not
recognized and the expenses that have been recognized will be
reversed.
The
following table summarizes performance based stock options
activity:
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
||
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Number
of
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Fair
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
|
Value
|
Value
|
Outstanding at
January 3, 2015
|
66,668
|
$1.89
|
8.08
|
|
|
Options
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
January 2, 2016
|
66,668
|
$1.89
|
7.08
|
|
|
Options
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2016
|
66,668
|
$1.89
|
6.08
|
|
|
Options
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 30, 2017
|
66,668
|
$1.89
|
5.08
|
|
$266,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at
December 30, 2017
|
66,668
|
$1.89
|
5.08
|
|
$266,000
|
The
aggregate intrinsic value in the table above are, based on the
Company’s closing stock price of $5.88 on the last day of
business for the period ended December 30, 2017.
3)
Market Based Stock Options
The
Company also grants stock option awards that are market based which
have vesting conditions associated with a service condition as well
as performance of the Company's stock price. The following table
summarizes market based stock options activity:
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
||
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Number
of
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Fair
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
|
Value
|
Value
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2016
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
|
|
Options
Granted
|
1,000,000
|
4.24
|
10.00
|
$3.04
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 30, 2017
|
1,000,000
|
$4.24
|
9.24
|
|
$1,640,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at
December 30, 2017
|
55,556
|
$4.24
|
9.24
|
|
$91,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
aggregate intrinsic value in the table above are, based on the
Company’s closing stock price of $5.88 on the last day of
business for the period ended December 30, 2017.
The
fair value of 1,000,000 options granted during the period ended
December 30, 2017 was measured using Monte Carlo simulations based
on a lattice approach with following assumptions:
|
Volatility:
|
67%
|
|
|
Contractual
Term:
|
10
years
|
|
|
Risk
Free Rate:
|
2.4%
|
|
|
Cost
of Equity:
|
15.7%
|
|
For the
contractual term, we are using 10 years as this is not a "plain
vanilla" option. SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 simplified
method for estimating the expected term can be only used if the
option is a "plain vanilla" option.
As of
December 30, 2017, there was approximately $5.7 million of total
unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested share-based
compensation arrangements granted under the plans for employee
stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2.5 years.
Restricted Stock Awards
Restricted
stock awards granted by the Company to employees have vesting
conditions that are unique to each award.
The
following table summarizes activity of restricted stock awards granted to
employees:
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
Award-Date
|
|
Shares
|
Fair
Value
|
Unvested shares at
January 3, 2015
|
530,007
|
$3.54
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
(173,336)
|
4.23
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Unvested shares at
January 2, 2016
|
356,671
|
$3.21
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
(6,668)
|
4.23
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Unvested shares at
December 31, 2016
|
350,003
|
$3.20
|
Granted
|
500,000
|
5.08
|
Vested
|
(666,668)
|
4.60
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Unvested shares at
December 30, 2017
|
183,335
|
$3.25
|
|
|
|
Expected to Vest as
of December 30, 2017
|
183,335
|
$3.25
|
During
the year ended December 30, 2017, the Company granted 500,000
shares of restricted stock award to the Company's President and
Chief Operating Officer Robert Fried, which vested during the year
ended December 30, 2017. The expense for vested restricted stock
was approximately $2.5 million and was recognized during the year
ended December 30, 2017.
During
the year ended December 30, 2017, the Company's former Chief
Financial Officer, Thomas Varvaro resigned and received immediate
vesting of his unvested restricted stock of 166,668 shares. The
expense for the vested restricted stock was approximately $525,000
and was recognized prior to the fiscal year 2015.
During
the years ended December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, several
members of the Board resigned from the Board and received immediate
vesting of their unvested restricted stock of 6,668 shares and
173,336 shares, respectively. The expense for the vested restricted
stock was approximately $761,000 and was recognized all during the
fiscal year ended January 3, 2015.
Employee Option and Restricted Stock
Compensation
The
Company recognized share-based compensation expense of
approximately $4.4 million, $1.1 million and $1.5 million in
general and administrative expenses in the statement of operations
for the years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and
January 2, 2016, respectively.
11B.
|
Non-Employee
Share-Based Compensation
|
Stock Option Plan
The
following table summarizes activity of stock options granted to
non-employees:
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
|
Number
of
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
|
Value
|
Outstanding at
January 3, 2015
|
350,158
|
$4.05
|
5.46
|
|
Options
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Options
Classification from Employee
to
Non-Employee
|
514,024
|
2.79
|
7.78
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Options
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Outstanding at
January 2, 2016
|
864,182
|
$3.31
|
6.04
|
|
Options
Granted
|
40,000
|
2.85
|
10.00
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
(41,667)
|
1.92
|
|
$98,000
|
Options
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2016
|
862,515
|
$3.35
|
5.23
|
|
Options
Granted
|
175,000
|
4.89
|
10.00
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
(21,042)
|
3.88
|
|
$24,000
|
Options
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 30, 2017
|
1,016,473
|
$3.61
|
5.16
|
$2,361,000*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at
December 30, 2017
|
824,806
|
$3.35
|
4.15
|
$2,088,000*
|
The
aggregate intrinsic values in the table above are, based on the
Company’s closing stock price of $5.88 on the last day of
business for the year ended December 30, 2017.
The
fair value of the Company’s stock options was estimated at
the date of grant using the Black-Scholes based option valuation
model. The table below outlines the weighted average assumptions
for options granted to non-employees during the years ended
December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Year Ended
December
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
Contractual
term
|
6 years
|
5 years
|
N/A
|
Volatility
|
69%
|
73%
|
N/A
|
Dividend
yield
|
0%
|
0%
|
N/A
|
Risk-free
rate
|
2%
|
2%
|
N/A
|
As of
December 30, 2017, there was approximately $651,000 of total
unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested share-based
compensation arrangements granted under the plans for non-employee
stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2.4 years.
Stock and Restricted Stock
Awards
Restricted
stock awards granted by the Company to non-employees generally
feature time vesting service conditions, specified in the
respective service agreements. Restricted stock awards issued to
non-employees are accounted for at current fair value through the
vesting period. The following table summarizes activity of
restricted stock awards issued to non-employees:
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
Shares
|
Fair
Value
|
Unvested shares at
January 3, 2015
|
25,333
|
$2.70
|
Granted
|
46,668
|
2.58
|
Vested
|
(54,668)
|
3.63
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Unvested shares at
January 2, 2016
|
17,333
|
$3.66
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
(7,333)
|
3.79
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Unvested shares at
December 31, 2016
|
10,000
|
$3.31
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
(8,000)
|
3.63
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Unvested shares
expected to vest at December 30, 2017
|
2,000
|
$5.88
|
As of
December 30, 2017, there was approximately $12,000 of total
unrecognized compensation expense related to the restricted stock
award to a non-employee. That cost is expected to be recognized
over a period of 2 months as of December 30, 2017.
The
Company did not award any stock grants to non-employees in 2017 and
2016. For the year ended January 2, 2016, the Company awarded
116,668 shares of the Company’s common stock to non-employees
and recognized expenses of $361,000.
Non-Employee Option, Stock and Restricted Stock Awards
For
non-employee share-based compensation, the Company recognized
share-based compensation expense of approximately $171,000, $61,000
and $435,000 in general and administrative expenses in the
statement of operations for the years ended December 30, 2017,
December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, respectively.
Note
12.
|
Stock
Issuance
|
Fiscal year 2017
On
April 26, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement with certain purchasers named therein, pursuant to which
the Company agreed to sell and issue up to $25.0 million of its
common stock at a purchase price of $2.60 per share in three
tranches of approximately $3.5 million, $16.4 million and $5.1
million, respectively. All three tranches closed during the year
ended December 30, 2017, whereby approximately 9.6 million shares
were issued for proceeds of $23.7 million, net of offering
costs.
On
November 3, 2017 the Company entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement for the sale of approximately $23.0 million of its common
stock in a private placement, in return for which the purchasers
received approximately 5.6 million shares at a per share price of
$4.10. The private placement closed during the year ended December
30, 2017 and the Company received proceeds of $22.9 million, net of
offering costs.
Fiscal year 2016
On
March 11, 2016, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement (the "March 2016 SPA") to raise $500,000 in a registered
direct offering. Pursuant to the March 2016 SPA, the Company sold a
total of 128,205 Units at a purchase price of $3.90 per Unit, with
each Unit consisting of one share of the Company’s common
stock and a warrant to purchase one half of a share of common stock
(64,103 total) with an exercise price of $4.80 and a term of 3
years. The estimated fair value of the warrant was approximately
$108,000 and the warrant was determined to be classified as equity.
The fair value was estimated at the date of issuance using the
Black-Scholes based valuation model. The table below outlines the
assumptions for the warrant issued.
|
March 11,
2016
|
Fair value of
common stock
|
$4.41
|
Contractual
term
|
3.0 years
|
Volatility
|
60%
|
Risk-free
rate
|
1.16%
|
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
On June
3, 2016, the Company entered into securities purchase agreements to
raise $5,250,000 in a registered direct offering, pursuant to
which, the Company sold a total of 1,117,022 shares of the
Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $4.70 per
share.
Fiscal year 2015
In
Fiscal Year 2015, the Company entered into securities purchase
agreements with certain existing stockholders to raise $2,000,000
in a registered direct offering. Pursuant to those securities
purchase agreements, the Company sold a total of 200,000 Units at a
purchase price of $10.00 per Unit, with each Unit consisting of
2.667 shares of the Company’s common stock and a warrant to
purchase 1.333 shares of common stock (266,667 total) with an
exercise price of $4.50 and a term of 3 years. The aggregate
estimated fair value of the warrants was approximately $489,000 and
these warrants were determined to be classified as equity. The fair
value was estimated at the date of issuance using the Black-Scholes
based valuation model. The table below outlines the assumptions for
the warrants issued.
|
November 9,
2015
|
Fair value of
common stock
|
$4.41
|
Contractual
term
|
3.0 years
|
Volatility
|
62%
|
Risk-free
rate
|
1.27%
|
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Note
13.
|
Warrants
|
The
following table summarizes activity of warrants at December 30,
2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 and changes during the
years then ended:
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
|
Number
of
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
|
Value
|
Outstanding and
exercisable at January 3, 2015
|
156,341
|
3.21
|
4.43
|
|
Warrants
Issued
|
266,667
|
4.50
|
|
|
Warrants
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Warrants
Expired
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Outstanding and
exercisable at January 2, 2016
|
423,008
|
4.02
|
3.07
|
|
Warrants
Issued
|
64,103
|
4.80
|
|
|
Warrants Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Warrants Expired
|
(16,667)
|
3.30
|
|
|
Outstanding and
exercisable at December 31, 2016
|
470,444
|
4.15
|
2.17
|
|
Warrants Issued
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Warrants Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Warrants
Expired
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
Outstanding and
exercisable at December 30, 2017
|
470,444
|
$4.15
|
1.17
|
$814,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
aggregate intrinsic values in the table above are based on the
Company’s closing stock price of $5.88 on the last day of
business for the year ended December 30, 2017.
The
fair values of warrants issued were estimated at the date of
issuance using the Black-Scholes based valuation model. The table
below outlines the weighted average assumptions for the warrants
issued during the years ended December 31, 2016 and January 2,
2016.
|
2016
|
2015
|
Fair value of
common stock
|
$4.41
|
$4.41
|
Contractual
term
|
3.0 years
|
3.0 years
|
Volatility
|
60%
|
62%
|
Risk-free
rate
|
1.16%
|
1.27%
|
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
0%
|
Note
14.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Lease
The
Company leases its office and research facilities in California,
Colorado and Maryland under operating lease agreements that expire
at various dates from September 2018 through February 2024. Monthly
lease payments range from $1,500 per month to $24,000 per month,
and minimum lease payments escalate during the terms of the leases.
Generally accepted accounting principles require total minimum
lease payments to be recognized as rent expense on a straight-line
basis over the term of the lease. The excess of such expense over
amounts required to be paid under the lease agreement is carried as
a liability on the Company’s consolidated balance
sheet.
Minimum
future rental payments under all of the leases as of December 30,
2017 are as follows:
Fiscal years
ending:
|
|
2018
|
$601,000
|
2019
|
590,000
|
2020
|
424,000
|
2021
|
340,000
|
2022
|
138,000
|
Thereafter
|
167,000
|
|
$2,260,000
|
Rent
expense was approximately $729,000, $606,000 and $536,000 for the
years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2,
2016, respectively.
As of
December 30, 2017, deferred rent from these operating lease
agreements increased to $492,000 compared to $380,000 as of
December 31, 2016. On July 6, 2017, the Company entered into a
lease for an office space located in Los Angeles, California.
Pursuant to the term of the lease, the landlord provided tenant
improvements for approximately $122,000. The landlord provided
lease incentive (a) has been recorded as leasehold improvement
asset and is amortized over the lease term which is through
September 2021; and (b) has been recorded as deferred rent and is
amortized as reductions to lease expense over the lease
term.
Subsequent
to the year ended December 30, 2017, the Company entered into a
lease amendment to lease additional office space located in Los
Angeles, California through October 2021. Pursuant to the lease,
the Company will make additional monthly lease payments ranging
from approximately $9,000 to $11,000, as the payments escalate
during the term of the lease.
Purchase obligations
The
Company enters into purchase obligations with various vendors for
goods and services that we need for our operations. The purchase
obligations for goods and services include inventory, research and
development, and laboratory supplies. Minimum future payments under
purchase obligations as of December 30, 2017 are as
follows:
Fiscal years
ending:
|
|
2018
|
$3,489,000
|
2019
|
82,000
|
|
$3,571,000
|
Royalty
The
Company has 11 licensing agreements with leading research
universities and other patent holders, pursuant to which the
Company acquired patents related to certain products the Company
offers to its customers. These agreements afford for future royalty
payments based on contractual minimums and expire at various dates
from December 31, 2019 through an estimated year of 2037. Yearly
minimum royalty payments including license maintenance fees range
from $10,000 per year to $83,000 per year, however, these minimum
payments escalate each year with a maximum of $200,000 per year. In
addition, the Company is required to pay a range of 2% to 8% of
sales related to the licensed products under these agreements.
Total royalty expenses including license maintenance fees from
continuing operations for the years ended December 30, 2017,
December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 were approximately $992,000,
$773,000 and $583,000, respectively under these agreements. Minimum
royalties including license maintenance fees for the next five
years are as follows:
Fiscal years
ending:
|
|
2018
|
$446,000
|
2019
|
612,000
|
2020
|
467,000
|
2021
|
485,000
|
2022
|
450,000
|
|
$2,460,000
|
|
|
Legal proceedings
On December 29, 2016, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a complaint (the
“Complaint”) in the United States District Court for
the Central District of California, naming Elysium Health, Inc.
(together with Elysium Health, LLC, “Elysium”) as
defendant. Among other allegations, ChromaDex, Inc. alleged in the
Complaint that (i) Elysium breached the Supply Agreement, dated
June 26, 2014, by and between ChromaDex, Inc. and Elysium (the
“pTeroPure® Supply Agreement”), by failing to make
payments to ChromaDex, Inc. for purchases of pTeroPure®
pursuant to the pTeroPure® Supply Agreement, (ii) Elysium
breached the Supply Agreement, dated February 3, 2014, by and
between ChromaDex, Inc. and Elysium, as amended (the
“NIAGEN® Supply Agreement”), by failing to make
payments to ChromaDex, Inc. for purchases of NIAGEN® pursuant
to the NIAGEN® Supply Agreement, (iii) Elysium breached the
Trademark License and Royalty Agreement, dated February 3, 2014, by
and between ChromaDex, Inc. and Elysium (the “License
Agreement”), by failing to make payments to ChromaDex, Inc.
for royalties due pursuant to the License Agreement and (iv)
certain officers of Elysium made false promises and representations
to induce ChromaDex, Inc. into providing large supplies of
pTeroPure® and NIAGEN® to Elysium pursuant to the
pTeroPure® Supply Agreement and NIAGEN® Supply Agreement.
ChromaDex, Inc. is seeking punitive damages, money damages and
interest.
On January 25, 2017, Elysium filed an answer and counterclaims (the
“Counterclaim”) in response to the Complaint. Among
other allegations, Elysium alleges in the Counterclaim that (i)
ChromaDex, Inc. breached the NIAGEN® Supply Agreement by not
issuing certain refunds or credits to Elysium and for violating
certain confidential information provisions, (ii) ChromaDex, Inc.
breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
pursuant to the NIAGEN® Supply Agreement, (iii) ChromaDex,
Inc. breached certain confidential provisions of the
pTeroPure® Supply Agreement, (iv) ChromaDex, Inc. fraudulently
induced Elysium into entering into the License Agreement (the
“Fraud Claim”), (v) ChromaDex, Inc.’s conduct
constitutes misuse of its patent rights (the “Patent
Claim”) and (vi) ChromaDex, Inc. has engaged in unlawful or
unfair competition under California state law (the “Unfair
Competition Claim”). Elysium is seeking damages for
ChromaDex, Inc.’s alleged breaches of the NIAGEN® Supply
Agreement and pTeroPure® Supply Agreement, and compensatory
damages, punitive damages and/or rescission of the License
Agreement and restitution of any royalty payments conveyed by
Elysium pursuant to the License Agreement, and a declaratory
judgment that ChromaDex, Inc. has engaged in patent
misuse.
On February 15, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. filed an amended complaint.
In the amended complaint, ChromaDex, Inc. re-alleges the claims in
the Complaint, and also alleges that Elysium willfully and
maliciously misappropriated ChromaDex, Inc.’s trade secrets.
On February 15, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. also filed a motion to
dismiss the Fraud Claim, the Patent Claim and the Unfair
Competition Claim. On March 1, 2017, Elysium filed a motion to
dismiss ChromaDex, Inc.'s fraud and trade secret misappropriation
causes of action. On March 6, 2017, Elysium filed a first amended
counterclaim. On March 20, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. moved to dismiss
Elysium's amended fraud, declaratory judgment of patent misuse and
the Unfair Competition Claim. On May 10, 2017, the court ruled on
the motions to dismiss, denying ChromaDex, Inc.’s motion as
to Elysium’s fraud and declaratory judgment claims and
granting ChromaDex, Inc.’s motion with prejudice as to
Elysium’s Unfair Competition Claim. With respect to
Elysium’s motion, the court granted the motion with prejudice
as to ChromaDex, Inc.’s fraud claim and granted with leave to
amend the motion as to ChromaDex, Inc.’s trade secret
misappropriation claims. On May 24, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. answered
the first amended counterclaim and asserted several affirmative
defenses. Also on May 24, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a second
amended complaint, amending the trade secret misappropriation
claims and addressing Elysium’s declaratory judgment of
patent misuse counterclaim. On June 7, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. filed
a third amended complaint dismissing the trade secret
misappropriation claims and asserting two breach of contract claims
for Elysium’s failure to pay for the product delivered. On
June 16, 2017, Elysium answered the third amended complaint. On
August 14, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. moved for judgment on the
pleadings as to Elysium’s declaratory judgment of patent
misuse counterclaim. On September 26, 2017, the court denied
ChromaDex’s motion without prejudice and directed Elysium to
file an amended counterclaim if it intended to maintain its
declaratory judgment counterclaim. On October 11, 2017, Elysium
filed a second amended counterclaim, re-alleging the claims in the
first amended counterclaim and adding a claim for unjust enrichment
and restitution of the royalties Elysium paid to ChromaDex, Inc.
pursuant to the License Agreement. On October 25, 2017, ChromaDex,
Inc. filed a motion to dismiss the declaratory judgment of patent
misuse and unjust enrichment claims and/or strike allegations in
the unjust enrichment claim contained in the second amended
counterclaim. On November 28, 2017, the court denied the motion.
ChromaDex, Inc. answered the second amended counterclaim on
December 12, 2017. The parties are currently in
discovery.
On July 17, 2017, Elysium filed petitions with the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office for inter partes review of U.S. Patent No.
8,197,807 (the “’807 Patent”) and 8,383,086 (the
“’086 Patent”), patents to which ChromaDex, Inc.
is the exclusive licensee. The U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board
(“PTAB”) denied institution of an inter partes review
for the ’807 Patent on January 18, 2018. For the ’086
patent, on January 29, 2018 the PTAB granted institution of an
inter partes review as to claims 1, 3, 4, and 5 and denied
institution as to claim 2.
On September 27, 2017, Elysium Health Inc. ("Elysium Health") filed
a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York, against ChromaDex, Inc. (the “SDNY
Complaint”). Elysium Health alleges in the SDNY Complaint
that ChromaDex, Inc. made false and misleading statements in a
citizen petition to the Food and Drug Administration it filed on or
about August 18, 2017. Among other allegations, Elysium Health
avers that the citizen petition made Elysium Health’s product
appear dangerous, while casting ChromaDex, Inc.’s own product
as safe. The SDNY Complaint asserts four claims for relief: (i)
false advertising under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a);
(ii) trade libel; (iii) deceptive business practices under New York
General Business Law § 349; and (iv) tortious interference
with prospective economic relations. ChromaDex, Inc. denies the
claims in the SDNY Complaint and intends to defend against them
vigorously. On October 26, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. moved to
dismiss the SDNY Complaint on the grounds that, inter alia, its statements in the
citizen petition are immune from liability under the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine, the
litigation privilege, and New York’s Anti-SLAPP statute, and
that the SDNY Complaint failed to state a claim. Elysium Health
opposed the motion on November 2, 2017. ChromaDex, Inc. filed its
reply on November 9, 2017. The motion is currently
pending.
On
October 26, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a complaint in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York against
Elysium Health (the “ChromaDex SDNY Complaint”).
ChromaDex alleges that Elysium Health made material false and
misleading statements to consumers in the promotion, marketing, and
sale of its health supplement product, Basis, and asserts five
claims for relief: (i) false advertising under the Lanham Act, 15
U.S.C. §1125(a); (ii) unfair competition under 15 U.S.C.
§ 1125(a); (iii) deceptive practices under New York General
Business Law § 349; (iv) deceptive practices under New York
General Business Law § 350; and (v) tortious interference with
prospective economic advantage. On November 16, 2017, Elysium
Health moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. ChromaDex,
Inc. opposed the motion on November 30, 2017 and Elysium Health
filed a reply on December 7, 2017. On November 3, 2017, the Court
consolidated the SDNY Complaint and the ChromaDex SDNY Complaint
actions under the caption In re
Elysium Health-ChromaDex Litigation, 17-cv-7394, and stayed
discovery in the consolidated action pending a Court-ordered
mediation. The mediation was unsuccessful and the motion is
currently pending.
The
Company is unable to predict the outcome of these matters and, at
this time, cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of
loss with respect to the legal proceedings discussed herein. As of
December 31, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. did not accrue a potential loss
for the Counterclaim or the SDNY Complaint because ChromaDex, Inc.
believes that the allegations are without merit and thus it is not
probable that a liability has been incurred.
From time to time we are involved in legal proceedings arising in
the ordinary course of our business. We believe that there is no
other litigation pending that is likely to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our financial condition
or results of operations.
Severance payments to named executive
officers
As of
December 30, 2017, the Company has four named executive officers,
Frank Jaksch, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, Robert Fried, President
and Chief Operating Officer, Kevin Farr, Chief Financial Officer
and Troy Rhonemus, Executive Vice President. Upon termination, Mr.
Jaksch, Mr. Fried, Mr. Farr and Mr. Rhonemus will receive severance
payments per the terms of the respective employment agreements
entered with the Company. The key terms of the employment
agreements, including the severance terms are as
follows:
Employment Agreement with Frank L. Jaksch Jr.
On
April 19, 2010, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement (the “Jaksch Agreement”) with
Frank L. Jaksch Jr. The Jaksch Agreement automatically renews
unless terminated in accordance with its terms. On January 2, 2014,
the Board approved raising the annual base salary of Mr. Jaksch to
$275,000 per year and the annual cash bonus target up to 50% of his
base salary. On March 14, 2016, the Board increased the base salary
of Mr. Jaksch to $320,000. On April 25, 2016, Mr. Jaksch’s
base salary increased to $370,000 as the Company’s common
stock was listed on Nasdaq Stock Market.
The
severance terms provide that in the event Mr. Jaksch’s
employment with the Company is terminated voluntarily, he will be
entitled to any accrued but unpaid base salary, any stock vested
through the date of his termination and a pro-rated portion of 50%
of his salary for the bonus. In addition, if Mr. Jaksch leaves
the Company for “Good Reason”, (as defined in Jaksch
Agreement), he will also be entitled to severance equal to 50% of
his salary, and he will be deemed to have been employed for the
entirety of such year. Severance will then consist of 16 weeks of
paid salary, unless Mr. Jaksch signs a release, in which case
he will receive compensation up to 12 months paid
salary.
In the
event the Company terminates Mr. Jaksch’s employment
“without Cause” (as defined in the Jaksch Agreement),
Mr. Jaksch will be entitled to severance in the form of any stock
vested through the date of his termination and continuation of his
base salary for a period of eight weeks, or, if Mr. Jaksch enters
into a standard separation agreement, Mr. Jaksch will receive
continuation of base salary and health benefits, together with
applicable fringe benefits until 24 months from the date of
termination (the “Severance Period”), and he will
receive a bonus of 50% of his base salary as well as the full
vesting of any otherwise unvested stock awards.
Employment Agreement with Robert Fried
On
March 12, 2017, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement
(the "Fried Agreement") with Robert Fried. Mr. Fried is entitled to
receive certain severance payments per the terms of the Fried
Agreement. The key terms of the Fried Agreement, including the
severance terms are as follows:
Mr.
Fried is entitled to: (i) an annual base salary of $300,000; (ii)
an annual cash bonus equal to (a) 1% of net direct-to-consumer
sales of products with nicotinamide riboside as a lead ingredient
by the Company plus (b) 2% of direct to consumer net sales of
products with nicotinamide riboside as a lead ingredient for the
portion of such sales that exceeded prior year sales plus (c) 1% of
the gross profit derived from nicotinamide riboside ingredient
sales to dietary supplement producers; (iii) an option to purchase
up to 500,000 shares of Common Stock under the 2007 Plan, subject
to monthly vesting over a three-year period, which option grant Mr.
Fried received on March 12, 2017; and (iv) 166,667 shares of
restricted Common Stock, which vested on December 20, 2017 in
connection with an amendment to the Fried Agreement (the "Fried
Amendment") by and between the Company and Mr. Fried, dated
December 20, 2017. In addition, Mr. Fried received 333,333 shares
of restricted stock on December 20, 2017, which were immediately
vested in connection with the Fried Amendment.
Subject
to Mr. Fried’s continuous service through such date, Mr.
Fried is also eligible to receive up to 500,000 shares of
fully-vested restricted Common Stock that will be granted upon the
achievement of certain performance goals. The Fried Amendment also
provides that Mr. Fried will be granted these shares of
performance-based restricted Common Stock immediately prior to the
consummation of a change in control of the Company, subject to Mr.
Fried's continuous service through such change in
control.
Any
unvested options or shares of restricted stock will vest in full
upon (a) a change in control of the Company, (b) Mr. Fried’s
death, (c) Mr. Fried’s disability, (d) termination by the
Company of Mr. Fried’s employment without cause or (e) Mr.
Fried’s resignation for good reason, subject in each case to
Mr. Fried’s continuous service as an employee or consultant
of the Company or any of its subsidiaries though such
event.
The
severance terms of the Fried Agreement provide that if (i) Mr.
Fried’s employment is terminated by the Company without
cause, for death or disability, or Mr. Fried resigns for good
reason, or (ii) (a) a change in control of the Company occurs and
(b) within one month prior to the date of such change in control or
twelve months after the date of such change in control Mr.
Fried’s employment is terminated by the Company other than
for cause, then, subject to executing a release, Mr. Fried will
receive (w) continuation of his base salary for 12 months, (x)
health care continuation coverage payments premiums for 12 months,
(y) a prorated annual cash bonus earned for the fiscal year in
which such termination or resignation occurs, and (z) an extended
exercise period for his options.
Employment Agreement with Kevin Farr
On
October 5, 2017, the Company entered into an Employee Agreement
(the "Farr Agreement") with Kevin M. Farr who was appointed by the
Board to serve as Chief Financial Officer, principal accounting
officer and principal financial officer. Mr. Farr is entitled to
receive certain severance payments per the terms of the Farr
Agreement. The key terms of the Farr Agreement, including the
severance terms are as follows:
Mr.
Farr is entitled to: (i) an annual base salary of $300,000 and (ii)
a discretionary annual bonus based on the achievement of certain
performance goals to be determined by the Board. Pursuant to the
Farr Agreement, Mr. Farr also received an option to purchase up to
1,000,000 shares of ChromaDex common stock under the ChromaDex 2017
Equity Incentive Plan, subject to monthly vesting over a three-year
period, with an exercise price equal to $4.24 per share. Any
unvested options will vest in full (a) upon a change of control of
the Company, subject to Mr. Farr’s continuous service through
such change of control, (b) on the date (the “Price Threshold
Date”) that the unweighted average closing price of the
Company’s common stock as quoted on the Nasdaq Capital Market
(or such similar established stock exchange) over the previous 20
trading days (including the date such calculation is measured)
first equals or exceeds $10.00 per share, subject to Mr.
Farr’s continuous service through such Price Threshold Date,
or (c) if Mr. Farr is terminated by the Company without cause or if
Mr. Farr resigns for good reason within 90 days prior to such
change of control or Price Threshold Date.
If Mr.
Farr’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause
or Mr. Farr resigns for good reason, then, subject to executing a
release, Mr. Farr will receive (i) continuation of his base salary
for 12 months, (ii) COBRA premiums for 12 months, (iii) a prorated
annual cash bonus, based on the good faith determination of the
Board of the actual results and period of employment during the
year of such termination, (iv) accelerated vesting of time-based
equity that would have otherwise become vested by the one year
anniversary of such termination date and (v) an extended exercise
period for his options.
Employment Agreement with Troy A. Rhonemus
On
March 6, 2014, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement
(the “Rhonemus Agreement”) with Mr. Troy Rhonemus
pursuant to which Mr. Rhonemus was appointed to serve as the Chief
Operating Officer of the Company. On March 17, 2015, the Board
increased the base salary to $190,000. The Rhonemus Agreement
provides for an annual cash bonus (based on performance targets) of
up to 30% of his base salary. On March 14, 2016, the Board
increased the base salary of Mr. Rhonemus to $210,000. On April 25,
2016, Mr. Rhonemus’ base salary increased to $235,000 as the
Company’s common stock was listed on Nasdaq Stock Market. On
February 1, 2018, the Compensation Committee increased the base
salary of Mr. Rhonemus to $250,000.
In the
event of a termination, Mr. Rhonemus will be entitled to any
accrued but unpaid base salary and any accrued but unpaid welfare
and retirement benefits up to the termination date. In addition, if
Mr. Rhonemus leaves the Company for “Good Reason” (as
defined in the Rhonemus Agreement), he will also be entitled to
severance equal to two weeks of base salary for each full year of
service to a maximum of eight weeks of the base
salary.
In the
event the Company terminates Mr. Rhonemus’ employment without
"Cause,” (as defined in the Rhonemus Agreement) Mr. Rhonemus
will be entitled to severance equal to two weeks of base salary for
each full year of service to a maximum of eight weeks of the base
salary, or, if Mr. Rhonemus enters into a standard separation
agreement, Mr. Rhonemus will receive continuation of base salary
and health benefits, together with applicable fringe benefits as
provided until the expiration of the term or renewal term then in
effect, however, that in the case of medical and dental insurance,
until the expiration of 12 months from the date of
termination.
Note
15.
|
Business
Segmentation and Geographical Distribution
|
Since
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company has made operational
changes to merge its scientific and regulatory consulting segment
into core standards and contract services segment. Additionally,
with the acquisition of Healthspan in March 2017, the Company began
selling consumer products that contain the Company's branded
NIAGEN® ingredient. The Company made operational changes and
began segregating its financial results for consumer products
operations.
As a
result, the Company has the following three reportable
segments:
●
Ingredients segment
develops and commercializes proprietary-based ingredient
technologies and supplies these ingredients to consumers in
finished products or as raw materials to the manufacturers of
consumer products in various industries including the nutritional
supplement, food and beverage and animal health
industries.
●
Consumer products
segment provides directly to consumers as well as to distributors
finished dietary supplement products that contain the Company's
proprietary ingredients.
●
Core standards and
contract services segment includes (i) supply of phytochemical
reference standards, (ii) scientific and regulatory consulting and
(iii) other research and development services.
On
September 5, 2017, the Company completed the sale of the Lab
Business which was a part of the core standards and contract
services segment. The discontinued operations related to the Lab
Business are not included in following statement of operations for
business segments.
The
“Corporate and other” classification includes corporate
items not allocated by the Company to each reportable segment.
Further, there are no intersegment sales that require elimination.
The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on
reviewing gross margin by reportable segment.
Year
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 30,
2017
|
Ingredients
|
Consumer
Products
|
Core
Standards and Contract Services
|
Corporate
|
|
|
segment
|
segment
|
segment
|
and
other
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
$11,153,371
|
$5,464,843
|
$4,583,268
|
$-
|
$21,201,482
|
Cost of
sales
|
5,491,920
|
2,189,597
|
3,042,660
|
-
|
10,724,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
5,661,451
|
3,275,246
|
1,540,608
|
-
|
10,477,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and
marketing
|
1,280,004
|
2,672,810
|
506,410
|
-
|
4,459,224
|
Research and
development
|
2,903,249
|
1,104,132
|
|
|
4,007,381
|
General and
administrative
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
17,641,889
|
17,641,889
|
Other
|
745,773
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
745,773
|
Operating
expenses
|
4,929,026
|
3,776,942
|
506,410
|
17,641,889
|
26,854,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
$732,425
|
$(501,696)
|
$1,034,198
|
$(17,641,889)
|
$(16,376,962)
|
Year
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
Ingredients
|
Consumer
Products
|
Core
Standards and Contract Services
|
Corporate
|
|
|
segment
|
segment
|
segment
|
and
other
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
$16,774,641
|
$-
|
$4,890,007
|
$-
|
$21,664,648
|
Cost of
sales
|
7,920,516
|
-
|
3,353,598
|
-
|
11,274,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
8,854,125
|
-
|
1,536,409
|
-
|
10,390,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and
marketing
|
1,196,711
|
-
|
361,502
|
-
|
1,558,213
|
Research and
development
|
2,487,978
|
-
|
34,790
|
-
|
2,522,768
|
General and
administrative
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
9,214,763
|
9,214,763
|
Operating
expenses
|
3,684,689
|
-
|
396,292
|
9,214,763
|
13,295,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
$5,169,436
|
$-
|
$1,140,117
|
$(9,214,763)
|
$(2,905,210)
|
Year
ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2,
2016
|
Ingredients
|
Consumer
Products
|
Core
Standards and Contract Services
|
Corporate
|
|
|
segment
|
segment
|
segment
|
and
other
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
$12,542,314
|
$-
|
$5,342,572
|
$-
|
$17,884,886
|
Cost of
sales
|
6,664,164
|
-
|
3,686,117
|
-
|
10,350,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
5,878,150
|
-
|
1,656,455
|
-
|
7,534,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and
marketing
|
1,111,993
|
-
|
395,875
|
-
|
1,507,868
|
Research and
development
|
891,601
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
891,601
|
General and
administrative
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7,201,231
|
7,201,231
|
Operating
expenses
|
2,003,594
|
-
|
395,875
|
7,201,231
|
9,600,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
$3,874,556
|
$-
|
$1,260,580
|
$(7,201,231)
|
$(2,066,095)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 30,
2017
|
Ingredients
|
Consumer
Products
|
Core
Standards and Contract Services
|
Corporate
|
|
|
segment
|
segment
|
segment
|
and
other
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
$9,742,400
|
$3,398,800
|
$2,558,801
|
$47,023,599
|
$62,723,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
2016
|
Ingredients
|
Consumer
Products
|
Core
Standards and Contract Services
|
Corporate
|
|
|
segment
|
segment
|
segment
|
and
other
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
$13,257,289
|
$-
|
$2,547,427
|
$3,947,352
|
$19,752,068
|
Revenues
from international sources for the ingredients segment approximated
$0.4 million, $0.5 million and $0.3 million for the years ended
December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016,
respectively. Revenues from international sources for the consumer
products segment approximated $4.2 million for the year ended
December 30, 2017. Revenues from international sources for the core
standards and contract services segment from continuing operations
approximated $1.0 million, $1.6 million and $1.8 million for the
years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and January 2,
2016, respectively. International sources which the Company
generates revenue from include Europe, North America, South
America, Asia, and Oceania.
The
Company’s long-lived assets are located within the United
States.
Disclosure of major
customers
Major
customers who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s
total sales from continuing operations were as
follows:
|
Years
Ended
|
||
Major
Customers
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
Customer G -
Related Party
|
19.4%
|
*
|
*
|
Customer
D
|
10.2%
|
11.0%
|
*
|
Customer C
(1)
|
*
|
23.9%
|
*
|
Customer
B
|
*
|
*
|
13.6%
|
|
|
|
|
* Represents less
than 10%.
|
|
|
|
(1) There is
ongoing litigation with Customer C
|
|
|
|
Major
customers who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s
total trade receivables were as follows:
|
Percentage of
the Company's
Total Trade
Receivables
|
|
Major
Customers
|
At
December 30, 2017
|
At
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Customer G -
Related Party
|
18.1%
|
*
|
Customer
D
|
13.4%
|
10.2%
|
Customer C
(1)
|
41.8%
|
45.8%
|
|
|
|
* Represents less
than 10%.
|
|
|
(1) There is
ongoing litigation with Customer C
|
|
|
Disclosure
of major vendors
Major
vendors who accounted for more than 10% of the Company's total
accounts payable were as follows:
|
Percentage of
the Company's
Total Accounts
Payable
|
|
Major
Vendors
|
At
December 30, 2017
|
At
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Vendor
A
|
*
|
39.5%
|
Vendor
B
|
*
|
20.8%
|
Vendor
C
|
14.5%
|
*
|
Vendor
D
|
10.4%
|
*
|
Vendor
E
|
10.3%
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Represents less
than 10%.
|
|
|
Note
16.
|
Other
Expense
|
Loss from an ongoing litigation,
Elysium
During the year ended December 30, 2017, the Company incurred a
write-off of approximately $746,000 in gross trade receivable from
Elysium related to royalties, due to inherent uncertainty about
collecting all damages sought by the Company, as well as the
Company’s decision to not seek damages for any unpaid royalty
payments under the License Agreement in connection with the defense
of Elysium’s claims for patent misuse and unjust enrichment.
As a result of this write-off and after further analysis, the
Company made an adjustment to the total allowance amount from
($800,000) to ($500,000).
Note
17.
|
Quarterly
Financial Information (unaudited)
|
|
Three Months
Ended
|
|||
|
April 1,
2017
|
July
1, 2017
|
September 30,
2017
|
December 30,
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales,
net
|
$3,367,647
|
$4,218,310
|
$6,084,690
|
$7,530,836
|
Cost of
sales
|
1,749,911
|
2,109,109
|
3,169,321
|
3,695,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
1,617,736
|
2,109,201
|
2,915,369
|
3,834,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
3,390,625
|
4,758,708
|
6,092,153
|
12,612,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss
|
(1,772,889)
|
(2,649,507)
|
(3,176,784)
|
(8,777,783)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating
expenses
|
(28,349)
|
(35,894)
|
(44,508)
|
(44,033)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(1,801,238)
|
(2,685,401)
|
(3,221,292)
|
(8,821,816)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations
|
(127,517)
|
(78,723)
|
5,358,369
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$(1,928,755)
|
$(2,764,124)
|
$2,137,077
|
$(8,821,816)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings
(loss) per common share
|
$(0.05)
|
$(0.07)
|
$0.05
|
$(0.17)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
(loss) per common share
|
$(0.05)
|
$(0.07)
|
$0.04
|
$(0.17)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
38,030,688
|
42,121,150
|
47,065,009
|
51,178,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
38,030,688
|
42,121,150
|
47,556,697
|
51,178,664
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|||
|
April 2,
2016
|
July
2, 2016
|
October 1,
2016
|
December 31,
2016
|
Sales,
net
|
$5,852,109
|
$7,422,470
|
$3,937,286
|
$4,452,783
|
Cost of
sales
|
3,008,391
|
3,748,684
|
2,074,325
|
2,442,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
2,843,718
|
3,673,786
|
1,862,961
|
2,010,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
2,811,652
|
3,514,974
|
2,787,123
|
4,181,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
32,066
|
158,812
|
(924,162)
|
(2,171,926)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating
expenses
|
(177,350)
|
(448,416)
|
(2,260)
|
(18,360)
|
Provision for
income taxes
|
(10,740)
|
4,087
|
3,153
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(156,024)
|
(285,517)
|
(923,269)
|
(2,186,786)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations
|
411,649
|
202,850
|
(31,121)
|
40,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$255,625
|
$(82,667)
|
$(954,390)
|
$(2,146,753)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings
(loss) per common share
|
$0.01
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.03)
|
$(0.06)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
(loss) per common share
|
$0.01
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.03)
|
$(0.06)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
36,414,041
|
36,990,032
|
37,868,672
|
37,904,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
37,472,579
|
36,990,032
|
37,868,672
|
37,904,534
|
Note
18.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
Subsequent
to the year ended December 30, 2017, the Board granted a total of
470,000 stock options at an exercise price of $5.85 per share and
500,000 stock options at an exercise price $5.65 per share to the
Company's executive officers.
Item
9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
None.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our
management, with the participation of our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer carried out an evaluation
of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as
of December 30, 2017. Pursuant to Rule13a−15(e) promulgated
by the Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the “Exchange Act”) “disclosure
controls and procedures” means controls and other procedures
that are designed to insure that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file with the Commission is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.
“Disclosure controls and procedures” include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to insure that
information that we are required to disclose in the reports we file
with the Commission is accumulated and communicated to our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Based on their evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December
30, 2017.
Inherent Limitations on Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
The
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures is subject
to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations,
judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood
of future events, the soundness of our systems, the possibility of
human error, and the risk of fraud. Moreover, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the
risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions and the risk that the degree of compliance with policies
or procedures may deteriorate over time. Because of these
limitations, there can be no assurance that any system of
disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived,
will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud or in making
all material information known in a timely manner to the
appropriate levels of management.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
were no change in internal controls over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a−15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act)
that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that have materially
affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal
control over financial reporting.
Management Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control
over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of consolidated financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Our internal control over financial reporting include
those policies and procedures that:
(i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
our assets;
(ii)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of our management and
directors; and
(iii)
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated
financial statements.
Our
management, including the undersigned principal executive officer
and principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of December 30,
2017. In conducting its assessment, our management used the
criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework in 2013. Based on this
assessment, our management concluded that, as of December 30,
2017, our internal control over financial reporting was effective
based on those criteria.
Inherent Limitations on Internal Control
Internal
control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance
of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent
limitations, including the possibility of human error and
circumvention by collusion or overriding of control. Accordingly,
even an effective internal control system may not prevent or detect
material misstatements on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the
risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, our internal control over
financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving their objectives.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting
Firm
The
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting has
been audited by Marcum LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report in Item 8 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which expresses an unqualified
opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 30, 2017.
None.
PART III
Information
required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement
under the headings “Management and Corporate
Governance,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance,” and is incorporated herein by
reference.
The
information required by this item regarding executive compensation
is incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the
sections titled “Executive Compensation” in the Proxy
Statement.
Item
12.
|
The
information required by this item regarding security ownership of
certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by
reference to the information set forth in the section titled
“Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management” in the Proxy Statement.
The
information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the
section titled “Executive Compensation” in the Proxy
Statement.
The
information required by this item regarding certain relationships
and related transactions and director independence is incorporated
by reference to the information set forth in the sections titled
“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and
“Management and Corporate Governance – Director
Independence,” respectively, in the Proxy
Statement.
The
information required by this item regarding principal accountant
fees and services is incorporated by reference to the information
set forth in the section titled “Audit Fees” in the
Proxy Statement.
PART IV
(a)(1) Financial Statements
Reference
is made to Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All
schedules have been omitted because they are not required or
because the required information is given in the Financial
Statements or Notes thereto set forth under Part II, Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
(a)(3) List of Exhibits
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 21, 2008, among Cody, CDI
Acquisition, Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc. as amended on June 10, 2008
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on June 24, 2008)
|
|
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 21, 2017, by and among
Covance Laboratories Inc., ChromaDex, Inc., ChromaDex Analytics,
Inc., and ChromaDex Corporation (incorporated by reference from,
and filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November 9,
2017)*(2)
|
|
|
Amendment
to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2017, by and
among Covance Laboratories Inc., ChromaDex, Inc., ChromaDex
Analytics, Inc., and ChromaDex Corporation (incorporated by
reference from, and filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November
9, 2017)
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of ChromaDex Corporation,
a Delaware corporation❖
|
|
|
Certificate
of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of ChromaDex
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (incorporated by reference
from, and filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 12,
2016)
|
|
|
Bylaws
of ChromaDex Corporation, a Delaware corporation (incorporated by
reference from, and filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 24,
2008)
|
|
|
Amendment
to Bylaws of ChromaDex Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on July 19, 2016)
|
|
|
Form of
Stock Certificate representing shares of ChromaDex Corporation
Common Stock (incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit
4.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with
the Commission on April 3, 2009)
|
|
|
Investor’s
Rights Agreement, effective as of December 31, 2005, by and between
The University of Mississippi Research Foundation and ChromaDex
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on June 24, 2008)
|
|
|
Tag-Along
Agreement effective as of December 31, 2005, by and among the
Company, Frank Louis Jaksch, Snr. & Maria Jaksch, Trustees of
the Jaksch Family Trust, Margery Germain, Lauren Germain, Emily
Germain, Lucie Germain, Frank Louis Jaksch, Jr., and the University
of Mississippi Research Foundation (incorporated by reference from,
and filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 24, 2008)
|
|
|
Form of
Stock Certificate representing shares of ChromaDex Corporation
Common Stock (New design effective as of January 1, 2016,
incorporated as by reference from and filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
Commission on March 17, 2016)
|
|
|
Second
Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan effective March 13,
2007, as amended May 20, 2010 (incorporated by reference from, and
filed as Appendix B to the Company’s Current Definitive Proxy
Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Commission on May 4,
2010)(1)+
|
|
|
Form of
Stock Option Agreement under the ChromaDex, Inc. Second Amended and
Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference
from, and filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 24,
2008)(1)+
|
|
|
Form of
Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement under the ChromaDex, Inc. 2007
Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from, and filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Commission on June 24, 2008)(1)+
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement dated April 19, 2010, by and
between Frank L. Jaksch, Jr. and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by
reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 22,
2010)(1)+
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement dated April 19, 2010, by and
between Thomas C. Varvaro and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by
reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 22,
2010)(1)+
|
|
|
Transition
and Separation Agreement, dated December 15, 2017, by and between
ChromaDex Corporation and Thomas C. Varvaro (incorporated by
reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December
21, 2017)+
|
|
|
Standard
Industrial/Commercial Multi-Tenant Lease – Net dated December
19, 2006, by and between ChromaDex, Inc. and SCIF Portfolio II, LLC
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on June 24, 2008)
|
|
|
First
Amendment to Standard Industrial/Commercial Multi-Tenant Lease,
made as of July 18, 2008, between SCIF Portfolio II, LLC
(“Lessor”) and ChromaDex, Inc. (“Lessee”)
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on July 23, 2008)
|
|
|
Second
Amendment to Standard Industrial/Commercial Multi-Tenant Lease,
made as of May 7, 2013, between SCIF Portfolio II, LLC
(“Lessor”) and ChromaDex, Inc. (“Lessee”)
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on May 7, 2013)
|
|
|
Licensing
Agreement Nutraceutical Standards effective as of December 31, 1999
between the University of Mississippi Research Foundation and
ChromaDex (incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit
10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Commission on June 24, 2008)
|
|
|
Equity
Based License Agreement dated October 25, 2001, by and between the
Company and Bayer Innovation, as amended as of October 30, 2003
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on June 24, 2008)
|
|
|
Stock
Redemption Agreement, dated June 18, 2008 between ChromaDex, Inc.
and Bayer Innovation GmbH (formerly named Bayer Innovation
Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH) (incorporated by reference from, and
filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 24, 2008)
|
|
|
License
Agreement, dated March 25, 2010 between the University of
Mississippi and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference from,
and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q filed with the Commission on May 18, 2010)*
|
|
|
First
Amendment to License Agreement, made as of June 3, 2011 between the
University of Mississippi and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by
reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August
11, 2011)*
|
|
|
Restated
and Amended License Agreement, effective as of June 3, 2015 between
the University of Mississippi and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by
reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August
13, 2015)*
|
|
|
License
Agreement, dated July 5, 2011 between ChromaDex, Inc. and Cornell
University (incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
with the Commission on November 10, 2011)*
|
|
|
Exclusive
License Agreement, dated September 8, 2011 between the Regents of
the University of California and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by
reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November
10, 2011)*
|
|
|
First
Amendment to the License Agreement, effective as of September 5,
2014 between the Regents of the University of California and
ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference from, and filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on November 6, 2014)*
|
|
|
Second
Amendment to the License Agreement, effective as of December 31,
2015, between the Regents of the University of California and
ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference from, and filed as
Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on November 10, 2016)*
|
|
|
Exclusive
License Agreement, dated July 13, 2012 between Dartmouth College
and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference from, and filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on November 10, 2016)
|
|
|
Exclusive
License Agreement, dated March 7, 2013 between Washington
University and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference from, and
filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November 10,
2016)
|
|
|
Amendment
#1 to Exclusive License Agreement, effective as of December 15,
2015, between Washington University and ChromaDex, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Commission on November 10, 2016)
|
|
|
NIAGEN®
Supply Agreement, dated July 9, 2013, by and between ChromaDex,
Inc. and Thorne Research, Inc. (incorporated by reference from, and
filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the Commission on July 12, 2013)
|
|
|
Addendum
to the Nicotinamide Riboside Supply Agreement, dated July 24, 2015,
by and between ChromaDex, Inc. and Thorne Research, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Commission on November 10, 2016)*
|
|
|
Second
Addendum to the Nicotinamide Riboside Supply Agreement, dated
September 14, 2016, by and between ChromaDex, Inc. and Thorne
Research, Inc. (incorporated by reference from, and filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed with the Commission on November 10, 2016)*
|
|
|
License
Agreement, made as of August 1, 2013, between Green Molecular S.L.,
Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference from, and filed
as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q filed with the Commission on November 10, 2016)
|
|
|
NIAGEN®
Supply Agreement by and between ChromaDex, Inc. and 5Linx
Enterprises, Inc. effective as of January 3, 2014 (incorporated by
reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 8,
2014)*
|
|
|
Purenergy
Supply Agreement by and between ChromaDex, Inc. and 5Linx
Enterprises, Inc. effective as of January 3, 2014 (incorporated by
reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 8,
2014)*
|
|
|
Addendum
to NIAGEN® Supply Agreement, effective as of June 26, 2014,
between 5Linx Enterprises, Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated
by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 12,
2016)
|
|
|
First
Amendment to NIAGEN® Supply Agreement, effective as of March
31, 2015, between 5Linx Enterprises, Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Commission on May 12, 2016)*
|
|
|
Second
Amendment to NIAGEN® Supply Agreement, effective as of March
3, 2016, between 5Linx Enterprises, Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Commission on May 12, 2016)*
|
|
|
Employment
Agreement by and between ChromaDex Corp. and Troy Rhonemus dated
March 6, 2014 (incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Commission on March 10, 2014)+
|
|
|
Exclusive
License Agreement, effective as of May 16, 2014 between Dartmouth
College and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference from, and
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 12,
2014)*
|
|
|
First
Amendment to Exclusive License Agreement, effective as of June 13,
2016, between Dartmouth College and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated
by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Commission on November 10, 2016)*
|
|
|
Loan
and Security Agreement by and between ChromaDex Corporation and
Hercules Technology II, L.P., as Lender and Hercules Technology
Growth Capital, Inc., as agent dated September 29, 2014
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the
Company’s Annual report on Form 10-K filed with the
Commission on March 19, 2015)
|
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Loan and Security Agreement by and between ChromaDex
Corporation and Hercules Technology II, L.P., as Lender and
Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc., as agent dated June 17,
2015 (incorporated by reference from and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on June 19, 2015)
|
|
|
License
Agreement, effective as of October 15, 2014 between University of
Mississippi and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference from,
and filed as Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s Annual report on
Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 19,
2015)*
|
|
|
First
Amendment to Exclusive License Agreement, effective as of July 6,
2015, between University of Mississippi and ChromaDex, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the
Company’s Quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Commission on November 10, 2016)
|
|
|
Exclusive
License and Supply Agreement, effective as of May 12, 2015 between
Suntava, Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference from,
and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 13,
2015)*
|
|
|
Exclusive
Supply Agreement, effective as of August 27, 2015 between
Healthspan Research, LLC and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by
reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November
12, 2015)*
|
|
|
Limited
Liability Company Agreement, effective as of August 27, 2015
between Healthspan Research LLC and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated
by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November
12, 2015)*
|
|
|
Interest
Purchase Agreement, effective as of August 27, 2015 between
Healthspan Research LLC and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by
reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November
12, 2015)*
|
|
|
Second
Addendum to Supply Agreement, effective as of January 28, 2016,
between Nectar7 LLC and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference
from, and filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November 10,
2016)*
|
|
|
Form of
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 11, 2016, between
an existing stockholder and ChromaDex Corporation (incorporated by
reference from and filed as Exhibit 10.01 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 11,
2016)
|
|
|
Form of
Warrant under the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of March
11, 2016, between an existing stockholder and ChromaDex Corporation
(incorporated by reference from and filed as Exhibit 10.02 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on March 11, 2016)
|
|
|
Lease
Agreement, made as of April 14, 2016, by and between Longmont
Diagonal Investments LLC and ChromaDex Analytics, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on April 20, 2016)
|
|
|
Supply
Agreement, effective as of February 3, 2014, between Elysium
Health, Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference from,
and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 12,
2016)*
|
|
|
Supply
Agreement, effective as of June 26, 2014, between Elysium Health,
Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference from, and filed
as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q filed with the Commission on May 12, 2016)*
|
|
|
Amendment
to Supply Agreement, effective as of February 19, 2016, between
Elysium Health, Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference
from, and filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 12,
2016)*
|
|
|
Form of
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2016, between an
existing stockholder and ChromaDex Corporation (incorporated by
reference from and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 6,
2016)
|
|
|
Business
Financing Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2016, between Western
Alliance Bank and ChromaDex Corporation (incorporated by reference
to, and filed as Exhibit 10.60 to the Registrant’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 16,
2017)
|
|
|
First
Business Financing Modification Agreement, dated as of February 16,
2017, between Western Alliance Bank and ChromaDex Corporation
(incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.61 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
Commission on March 16, 2017)
|
|
|
Second
Business Financing Modification Agreement, dated as of March 12,
2017, between Western Alliance Bank and ChromaDex Corporation
(incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.62 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
Commission on March 16, 2017)
|
|
|
Third
Business Financing Modification Agreement, dated as of April 19,
2017, between Western Alliance Bank and ChromaDex Corporation
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Commission on August 10, 2017)
|
|
|
Fourth
Business Financing Modification Agreement, dated as of July 13,
2017, between Western Alliance Bank and ChromaDex Corporation
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Commission on August 10, 2017)
|
|
|
Fifth
Business Financing Modification Agreement, dated as of August 21,
2017, by and among Western Alliance Bank, ChromaDex Corporation,
ChromaDex, Inc., ChromaDex Analytics, Inc. and Healthspan Research,
LLC (incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Commission on November 9, 2017)
|
|
|
Form of
Indemnity Agreement, between ChromaDex Corporation and each of its
existing directors and executive officers. (incorporated by
reference from and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December
16, 2016)+
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy
(incorporated by reference from, and filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Commission on August 10, 2017)+
|
|
|
Membership
Interest Purchase Agreement effective as of March 12, 2017, by and
among Robert Fried, Charles Brenner, Jeffrey Allen and the
Registrant (incorporated by reference from and filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Commission on May 11, 2017)
|
|
|
Executive
Employment Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2017, between Robert
Fried and ChromaDex Corporation (incorporated by reference to, and
filed as Exhibit 10.65 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 16,
2017)+
|
|
|
Amendment
to Executive Employment Agreement, dated December 20, 2017, by and
between ChromaDex Corporation and Robert Fried (incorporated by
reference from and filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 21,
2017)+
|
|
|
Form of
Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Robert Fried (incorporated by
reference from and filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11,
2017)+
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated April 26, 2017, by and among the Company
and the Purchasers (incorporated by reference from and filed as
Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Commission on April 27, 2017)
|
|
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated April 29, 2017, by and among the Company
and the Purchasers (incorporated by reference from and filed as
Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Commission on May 2, 2017)
|
|
|
First
Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement, dated May 24, 2017, by
and among the Company and the Purchasers (incorporated by reference
from and filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 25, 2017)
|
|
|
ChromaDex
Corporation 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended
❖+
|
|
|
License
Agreement dated June 9, 2017, by and between ChromaPharma, Inc. and
the Scripps Research Institute (incorporated by reference from and
filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q filed with the Commission on August 10, 2017)*
|
|
|
Research
Funding Agreement dated June 9, 2017, by and between ChromaPharma,
Inc. and the Scripps Research Institute (incorporated by reference
from and filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 10,
2017)*
|
|
|
Executive
Employment Agreement, dated October 5, 2017, by and between Kevin
M. Farr and ChromaDex Corporation (incorporated by reference from
and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the Commission on October 10, 2017)+
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated November 3, 2017, by and among the Company
and the Purchasers (incorporated by reference from and filed as
Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Commission on November 6, 2017)
|
|
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated November 3, 2017, by and among the Company
and the Purchasers (incorporated by reference from and filed as
Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Commission on November 6, 2017)
|
|
|
Executive
Employment Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2018, by and between
Mark Friedman and ChromaDex Corporation❖+
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
of ChromaDex Corporation❖
|
|
|
Consent
of Marcum, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm❖
|
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to §240.13a-14 or
§240.15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended❖
|
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to §240.13a-14 or
§240.15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended❖
|
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002)❖
|
_________
❖
|
Filed
herewith.
|
(1)
|
Plan and related
Forms were assumed by ChromaDex Corporation pursuant to Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 21, 2008, among ChromaDex
Corporation (formerly Cody Resources, Inc.), CDI Acquisition, Inc.
and ChromaDex, Inc.
|
(2)
|
Schedules have been
omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. ChromaDex
Corporation undertakes to furnish supplemental copies of any of the
omitted schedules upon request by the Securities and Exchange
Commission; provided, however, that ChromaDex Corporation may
request confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for any schedule so
furnished.
|
+
|
Indicates
management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement.
|
*
|
This Exhibit has
been granted confidential treatment and has been filed separately
with the Commission. The confidential portions of this Exhibit have
been omitted and are marked by an asterisk.
|
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized, on the 15th day of March 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
CHROMADEX
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
FRANK L. JAKSCH JR.
|
|
|
Frank
L. Jaksch Jr.
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints Frank L. Jaksch
Jr. and Kevin Farr, and each of them, his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments
(including post-effective amendments) to this report, and to file
the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith,
as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them, or their or his
substitutes or substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
FRANK L. JAKSCH JR.
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Director
|
|
March
15, 2018
|
Frank
L. Jaksch Jr.
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
KEVIN FARR
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
March
15, 2018
|
Kevin
Farr
|
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
ROBERT FRIED
|
|
President,
Chief Operating Officer and Director
|
|
March
15, 2018
|
Robert
Fried
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
STEPHEN ALLEN
|
|
Chairman
of the Board and Director
|
|
March
15, 2018
|
Stephen
Allen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
STEPHEN BLOCK
|
|
Director
|
|
March
15, 2018
|
Stephen
Block
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
JEFF BAXTER
|
|
Director
|
|
March
15, 2018
|
Jeff
Baxter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
KURT GUSTAFSON
|
|
Director
|
|
March
15, 2018
|
Kurt
Gustafson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
STEVEN RUBIN
|
|
Director
|
|
March
15, 2018
|
Steven
Rubin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
TONY LAU
|
|
Director
|
|
March
15, 2018
|
Tony
Lau
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
March
15, 2018
|
Wendy
Yu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-100-