ChromaDex Corp. - Annual Report: 2019 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
[X]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
or
[
] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For
the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-37752
CHROMADEX
CORPORATION
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
Delaware
|
|
26-2940963
|
(State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
10900 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 600, Los
Angeles, California
|
|
90024
|
(Address of
Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code (310) 388-6706
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
|
Trading Symbol
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
|
CDXC
|
The Nasdaq Capital Market
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check
mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X
]
Indicate by check
mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No
[X]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such
files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated
filer,” “large accelerated filer,” and
“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer [ ]
Accelerated filer [X]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]
Smaller
reporting company [X] Emerging growth
company [ ]
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financing accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
As of
June 30, 2019, the last business day of the registrant’s most
recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market
value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates
of the registrant was approximately $190.4 million, based on the
closing price of the registrant’s common stock on the NASDAQ
Capital Market on June 30, 2019.
Number
of shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding as of March
3, 2020: 59,787,897.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the Registrant’s proxy statement (the “Proxy
Statement”) to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”)
pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the
registrant’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will
be filed subsequent to the date hereof, are incorporated by
reference into Part III of this Form 10‑K. Such Proxy
Statement will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days
following the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended
December 31, 2019.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) contains
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, which are subject to the safe harbor
created by those sections.
We may,
in some cases, use words such as “anticipate,”
“believe,” “could,” “estimate,”
“expect,” “intend,” “may,”
“plan,” “potential,” “predict,”
“project,” “should,” “will,”
“would” or the negative of these terms, and similar
expressions that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes to
identify these forward-looking statements. Any statements contained
herein that are not statements of historical facts may be deemed to
be forward-looking statements and are based upon our current
expectations, beliefs, estimates and projections, and various
assumptions, many of which, by their nature, are inherently
uncertain and beyond our control. Such statements, include, but are
not limited to, statements contained in this Form 10-K relating to
our business, business strategy, products and services we may offer
in the future, the outcome and impact of litigation, the timing and
results of future regulatory filings, the timing and results of
future clinical trials, our ability to collect from major
customers, sales and marketing strategy and capital outlook.
Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations
and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other
future conditions. Because forward looking statements relate to the
future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and
changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual
results may differ materially from those contemplated by the
forward-looking statements. They are neither statement of
historical fact nor guarantees of assurance of future performance.
We caution you therefore against relying on any of these
forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those in the forward
looking statements include, but are not limited to, a decline in
general economic conditions nationally and internationally;
decreased demand for our products and services; market acceptance of our products;
the ability to protect our intellectual property rights; impact of
any litigation or infringement actions brought against us;
competition from other providers and products; risks in product
development; inability to raise capital to fund continuing
operations; changes in government regulation; the ability to
complete customer transactions and capital raising transactions,
and other factors (including the risks contained in Item 1A of this
Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors”) relating to
our industry, our operations and results of operations and any
businesses that may be acquired by us. Should one or more of these
risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the underlying
assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ
significantly from those anticipated, believed, estimated,
expected, intended or planned.
Factors
or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge
from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of
them, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business
or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may
cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in
any forward-looking statements we may make. Given these
uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements. We cannot guarantee future results,
levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required
by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to and do not intend
to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these
statements to actual results.
Item
1.
Business
Unless
otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, references
to the “Company”, “ChromaDex”,
“we”, “us” and “our” refer to
ChromaDex Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
Company Overview
ChromaDex
is a science-based integrated nutraceutical company devoted to
improving the way people age. ChromaDex scientists partner with
leading universities and research institutions worldwide to
discover, develop and create solutions to deliver the full
potential of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide ("NAD") and its
impact on human health.
NAD is
an essential coenzyme and a key regulator of cellular metabolism.
Best known for its role in cellular energy production, NAD is now
thought to play an important role in healthy aging. Many cellular
functions related to health and healthy aging are sensitive to
levels of locally available NAD and this represents an active area
of research in the field of NAD.
NAD
levels are not constant, and in humans, NAD levels have been shown
to decline by more than 50% from young adulthood to middle age. NAD
continues to decline as humans grow older. There are other causes
of reduced NAD levels such as over-nutrition, alcohol consumption
and a number of disease states. NAD may also be increased,
including through calorie restriction and exercise. Healthy aging,
mitochondria and NAD continue to be areas of focus in the research
community. As of 2019, there were over 250 published human clinical
studies on NAD. The areas of study include Alzheimer’s
disease, Parkinson’s disease, neuropathy and heart
failure.
In
2013, ChromaDex commercialized NIAGEN® nicotinamide riboside
("NR"), a novel form of vitamin B3. Data from numerous animal
studies, and confirmed in human clinical trials, show that NR is a
highly efficient NAD precursor that significantly raises NAD
levels. NIAGEN® is safe for human consumption. NIAGEN®
has twice been successfully reviewed under FDA's new dietary
ingredient (“NDI”) notification program, has been
successfully notified to the FDA as generally recognized as safe
(“GRAS”), and has been approved by Health Canada, the
European Commission and the Therapeutic Goods Administration of
Australia. Animal studies of NIAGEN® have demonstrated a
variety of outcomes ranging from increased NAD levels, increased
cellular metabolism and energy production to improvements in
insulin sensitivity. NIAGEN® is the trade name for our
proprietary ingredient NR, and is protected by patents to which we
are the exclusive licensee.
ChromaDex
is the world leader in the emerging NAD space. ChromaDex has
approximately 190 partnerships with leading universities and
research institutions around the world including the National
Institutes of Health, Cornell, Dartmouth, Harvard, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, University of Cambridge and the Mayo
Clinic. Other relationships are currently being
developed.
Our
scientific advisory board is led by Chairman Dr. Roger Kornberg,
Nobel Laureate Stanford Professor, Dr. Charles Brenner, one of the
world’s recognized experts in NAD and inventor of
nicotinamide riboside, Dr. Rudi Tanzi, the co-chair of the
department of neurology at Harvard Medical School and one of the
world’s leading experts in food and nutrition, Sir John
Walker, Nobel Laureate and Emeritus Director, MRC Mitochondrial
Biology Unit in the University of Cambridge, England, Dr. Bruce
German, Chairman of food, nutrition and health at the University of
California, Davis, Dr. Brunie Felding, Associate Professor,
Department of Molecular Medicine at Scripps Research Institute,
California Campus and Dr. Robert Beudeker, Vice President of
Innovation, who leads the innovation program for human nutrition
and health at DSM.
STRATEGIC SHIFT TO GLOBAL CONSUMER PRODUCT COMPANY
The
acquisition of Healthspan Research LLC, a company that sold our TRU
NIAGEN® branded product direct to consumers, marked our
strategic shift from an ingredient and testing company to a global,
science-based integrated nutraceutical company. ChromaDex made the
strategic decision to commercialize TRU NIAGEN® as a consumer
brand for the product containing NIAGEN® ingredient, launching
in 2017.
In
connection with our strategic decision to grow our global consumer
brand, we have reduced the number of NIAGEN® resellers to just
a few. As expected, our ingredients segment net sales decreased 28%
in 2019, from $8.6 million in 2018 to $6.2 million. However, our
net sales of TRU NIAGEN® increased by $17.6 million, from
$18.5 million in 2018 to $36.1 million in 2019, to more than offset
the decrease in net sales of our ingredients segment.
We
began the international expansion of our TRU NIAGEN® brand
with the launch in Hong Kong and Macau with our strategic partner,
A.S. Watson Group, in 2017, followed by the launch in Singapore in
2018. In 2018, we also launched TRU NIAGEN® in New Zealand
with retail partner Matakana Superfoods and in Canada by making it
available at www.truniagen.ca and to healthcare practitioners at
Fullscript Canada after receiving regulatory approval for sale from
Health Canada.
We are currently selling cross border in China on
Tmall, and on Amazon in the United Kingdom, Canada and Japan. In
2019, we received a positive opinion from the European Food Safety
Authority on NR as a novel food ingredient for use in food
supplement and approval from the Australian Therapeutic Goods
Association for use in listed complementary medicines. We will
continue to focus on obtaining additional regulatory approvals
required to expand our marketing and distribution of our TRU
NIAGEN® brand in new strategic international
markets.
INGREDIENTS AND ANALYTICAL REFERENCE STANDARDS AND SERVICES
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Through
our ingredients business segment, we will continue to sell
NIAGEN® in ingredient form to our strategic partners,
including Nestec Ltd. (“Nestlé”), a global leader
pioneering quality science-based nutritional health solutions. In
2018, we entered into a supply agreement with Nestlé, pursuant
to which Nestlé will be our exclusive customer for
NIAGEN® for human use in the (i) medical nutritional and (ii)
functional food and beverage categories in certain territories. As
consideration for the rights granted to Nestlé, we received an
upfront fee of $4 million. Following the launch of the products in
certain territories, Nestlé will additionally pay us a
one-time fee for a potential total aggregate payment of $6
million.
We are
a leading provider of research and quality-control products and
services to the natural products industry. Through our analytical
reference standards and services segment, customers worldwide in
the dietary supplement, food and beverage, cosmetic and
pharmaceutical industries use our products, which are small
quantities of highly-characterized, research-grade, plant-based
materials, to ensure the quality of their raw materials and
finished products. We have conducted this analytical reference
standards and services business since 1999.
For the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, our
revenues were approximately $46.3 million and $31.6 million,
respectively. The following table summarizes the Company’s
total sales for each of the business segments in the last two
years. Please refer to Item 8 Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
additional financial information for each of the business
segments.
Fiscal
Years
|
Consumer
Products
Segment
|
Ingredients
Segment
|
Analytical
Reference
Standards
and
Services
Segment
|
Total
|
2019
|
$36.1
million
|
$6.2
million
|
$4.0
million
|
$46.3
million
|
2018
|
$18.5
million
|
$8.6
million
|
$4.5
million
|
$31.6
million
|
Company Background
On May
21, 2008, Cody Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation and a public
company, (“Cody”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Cody, CDI
Acquisition, Inc., a California corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Cody (“Acquisition Sub”), and ChromaDex,
Inc. (the “Merger”). Subsequent to the signing of the
Merger Agreement, Cody merged with and into a Delaware corporation.
On June 20, 2008, Cody amended its articles of incorporation to
change its name to ChromaDex Corporation. ChromaDex Corporation was
traded on the Over the Counter market under the symbol "CDXC." On
April 25, 2016, ChromaDex Corporation became listed on the NASDAQ
Capital Market under the symbol "CDXC."
ChromaDex,
Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of ChromaDex Corporation, was
originally formed as a California corporation on February 19,
2000.
On
March 12, 2017, ChromaDex Corporation acquired Healthspan Research
LLC, a consumer product company offering TRU NIAGEN® branded
products. This marked the strategic shift to become a global,
science-based integrated nutraceutical company. On September 5,
2017, the Company completed the sale of its operating assets that
were used with the Company's quality verification program testing
and analytical chemistry business for food and food related
products to Covance Laboratories Inc.
Business Market
According
to the data from Global Wellness Institute, the global wellness
industry market was approximately $4.2 trillion in 2017. Personal
care, beauty and anti-aging market was approximately $1.1 trillion,
healthy eating, nutrition and weight loss was approximately $702
billion and traditional and complementary medicine market was
approximately $360 billion.
According
to the data from Grand View Research, the global dietary
supplements market size was estimated at $123 billion in 2019, and
is expected to grow at a CAGR of 8.2% to about $232 billion by
2027.
Business Model
CONSUMER PRODUCTS SEGMENT
Our
business model is to sell TRU NIAGEN® to consumers worldwide.
As a world leader in the emerging NAD space and the science of
aging, we will continue to seek to discover and enhance patented
technology and evolve our TRU NIAGEN® products to improve
health by safely raising NAD levels. The TRU NIAGEN® brand is
built on scientific evidence, trust and the direct impact to our
consumers of aging better.
We
intend to expand to the worldwide NAD-related healthy aging market
by entering into new international markets. We will continue to
focus on obtaining additional regulatory approvals required to
expand our marketing and distribution of our TRU NIAGEN®
products in new international markets. We will utilize our
proprietary ecommerce platforms, and the ecommerce and brick and
mortar platforms of strategic regional and local partners. Our
United States ("U.S.") based business will continue to support our
global operations, including:
➢
Corporate
development and strategy
➢
Research and
development activities
➢
Science
➢
Global premium
brand management and brand guidelines
➢
Multi-platform
global marketing campaigns and know-how
➢
Build and evolve
propriety ecommerce platform and data analytics
➢
Global
manufacturing and supply chain operations
We
expect to continue to supply our international operations with
finished products manufactured in the U.S, and to continue to
provide all our marketing materials and know-how to our
international strategic partners.
INGREDIENTS SEGMENT
We will
continue to sell NIAGEN® in ingredient form to our strategic
partners. In addition, we will also continue to identify, acquire
and commercialize other innovative new proprietary ingredients and
technologies. We have an experienced team that is capable of
advancing products through development into commercialization with
the required regulatory approval, safety, toxicology, clinical
trials, supply chain management, manufacturing, and ultimately
either directly selling the products or licensing to third
parties.
ANALYTICAL REFERENCE STANDARDS AND SERVICES SEGMENT
We have
taken advantage of both supply chain needs and regulatory
requirements to build our analytical reference standards and
services segment. We believe that we create value throughout the
supply chain of the dietary supplements, functional foods and
personal care markets. We will capitalize on additional
opportunities in product development and commercialization of
various kinds of intellectual property that we have largely
discovered and acquired through the sales process associated with
this segment.
Overview of our Products and Services
Current
products and services
provided are as follows:
CONSUMER PRODUCTS
●
TRU NIAGEN® branded dietary
supplements. We currently offer our NIAGEN®
nicotinamide riboside through our TRU NIAGEN® finished
bottles. We will continue to build our TRU NIAGEN® as a global
brand and offer TRU NIAGEN® to consumers worldwide. We are
conducting additional clinical trials to further validate the
health benefits associated with NIAGEN® and TRU
NIAGEN®.
INGREDIENTS
●
Nicotinamide riboside NIAGEN®. We
will continue to develop and sell NIAGEN® in ingredient form
to strategic partners.
●
Spirulina Extract
Immulina™. IMMULINA™ is a spirulina
extract and the predominant active compounds are Braun-type
lipoproteins which are useful for improving human immune function.
These lipoproteins are present at much greater levels than those
found within commonly used immune enhancing botanicals such as
Echinacea and ginseng.
ANALYTICAL REFERENCE STANDARDS AND SERVICES
●
Supply of reference standards and fine
chemicals. We supply a wide range of products necessary to
conduct quality control of raw materials and consumer products.
Reference standards and fine chemicals are used for research and
quality control in the dietary supplements, cosmetics, food and
beverages, and pharmaceutical industries.
Sales and Marketing Strategy
For our
consumer products segment, we employ a variety of strategies to
drive sales and consumer awareness of TRU NIAGEN®, including
social media and internet advertising, managing websites,
influencers, paid spokespersons and talent, events and tradeshows,
e-mail, paid search, distribution of research publications and
press releases. We also have a customer care department that
handles day-to-day communications with our end customers addressing
any needs or concerns related to our TRU NIAGEN®
product.
For our
ingredients segment and analytical reference standards and services
segment, our strategy is based on a direct, technically-oriented
model. We recruit and hire sales and marketing staff with
appropriate commercial and scientific backgrounds.
USA:
For our
consumer products segment, we are distributing our TRU NIAGEN®
products direct to consumers through our propriety ecommerce
platform TRUNIAGEN.com, Amazon and other established internet
marketplaces. We also have specialty retailers and direct
healthcare practitioners who are authorized resellers of TRU
NIAGEN® in the U.S.
For our
ingredients segment and analytical reference standards and services
segment, we intend to
continue to use a direct marketing approach in the U.S. to promote
our products and services.
International:
For our
consumer products segment, we utilize strategic partners on a
regional or local country basis to expand our distribution of TRU
NIAGEN® products. Our strategic partnerships include brick and
mortar and/or ecommerce channels. We also are evaluating strategic
joint ventures to rapidly expand our distribution in Asia. We began
our international expansion of TRU NIAGEN® products with the
successful launch in Hong Kong and Macau with our strategic
partner, A.S. Watson Group in 2017, followed by the launch in
Singapore in 2018. In 2018, we also launched TRU NIAGEN® in
New Zealand with retail partner Matakana Superfoods and in Canada
by making it available at www.truniagen.ca and to healthcare
practitioners at Fullscript Canada after receiving regulatory
approval for sale from Health Canada. We are currently selling
cross border in China on Tmall, and on Amazon in the United
Kingdom, Canada and Japan. In 2019, we received a positive opinion
from the European Food Safety Authority on NR as a novel food
ingredient for use in food supplement and approval from the
Australian Therapeutic Goods Association for use in listed
complementary medicines. We will continue to focus on obtaining
additional regulatory approvals required to expand our marketing
and distribution of our TRU NIAGEN® brand in new strategic
international markets.
For our
ingredients segment, most of our customers are based currently in
the U.S.
For our
analytical reference standards and services segment outside of the
U.S., we use
international distributors to market and sell to several foreign
countries or markets. The use of distributors in some international
markets has proven to be more effective than direct
sales.
Government Regulation
Some of
our operations are subject to regulation by various United States
federal agencies and similar state and international agencies,
including the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), the
Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the Department of
Commerce, the Department of Transportation, the Department of
Agriculture and other state and international agencies. These
regulators govern a wide variety of production activities, from
design and development to labeling, manufacturing, handling,
selling and distributing of products. From time to time, federal,
state and international legislation is enacted that may have the
effect of materially increasing the cost of doing business or
limiting or expanding our permissible activities. We cannot predict
whether or when potential legislation or regulations will be
enacted, and, if enacted, the effect of such legislation,
regulation, implementation, or any implemented regulations or
supervisory policies would have on our financial condition or
results of operations. In addition, the outcome of any litigation,
investigations or enforcement actions initiated by state or federal
authorities could result in changes to our operations being
necessary and in increased compliance costs.
U.S. FDA Regulation
In the
United States dietary supplements and food are subject to FDA
regulations. For example, the FDA’s final rule on Good
Manufacturing Practices (“GMPs”) for dietary
supplements published in June 2007 requires companies to evaluate
products for identity, strength, purity and composition. These
regulations, in some cases, particularly for new ingredients,
require a notification that must be submitted to the FDA along with
evidence of safety. In addition, depending on the type of product,
whether a dietary supplement, cosmetic, food, or pharmaceutical,
the FDA, under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the "FDCA"), can
regulate:
●
product
testing;
●
ingredient
testing;
●
documentation
process, batch records, specifications;
●
product
labeling;
●
product
manufacturing and storage;
●
NDI
status;
●
health claims,
advertising and promotion; and
●
product sales and
distribution.
The
FDCA has been amended several times with respect to dietary
supplements, most notably by the Dietary Supplement Health and
Education Act of 1994 (“DSHEA”). DSHEA established a
new framework for governing the composition and labeling of dietary
supplements. Generally, under DSHEA, dietary ingredients that were
marketed in the United States before October 15, 1994, may be
used in dietary supplements without notifying the FDA. However, an
NDI (a dietary ingredient that was not marketed in the United
States before October 15, 1994) is subject to NDI notification
that must be submitted to the FDA unless the ingredient has
previously been “present in the food supply as an article
used for food” without being “chemically
altered.” An NDI notification must provide the FDA with
evidence of a “history of use or other evidence of
safety” establishing that the use of the dietary ingredient
“will reasonably be expected to be safe.” An NDI
notification must be submitted to the FDA at least 75 days before
the initial marketing of the NDI. There can be no assurance that
the FDA will accept the evidence of safety for any NDIs that we may
want to commercialize, and the FDA’s refusal to accept such
evidence could prevent the marketing of such dietary ingredients.
The FDA is in the process of developing guidance for the industry
that will aim to clarify the FDA’s interpretation of the NDI
notification requirements, and this guidance may raise new and
significant regulatory barriers for NDIs.
For any
new ingredient developed by us to be used in conventional food or
beverage products in the United States, the product either must be
approved by the FDA as a food additive pursuant to a food additive
petition ("FAP") or be generally recognized as safe ("GRAS"). The
FDA does not have to approve a company’s determination that
an ingredient is GRAS. However, a company can notify the FDA of its
determination. There can be no assurance that the FDA will approve
any FAP for any ingredient that we may want to commercialize, or
agree with our determination that an ingredient is GRAS, either of
which could prevent the marketing of such ingredient.
U.S. Advertising Regulations
In
addition to FDA regulations, the FTC regulates the advertising of
dietary supplements, foods, cosmetics, and over-the-counter
("OTC"), drugs. In recent years, the FTC has instituted numerous
enforcement actions against dietary supplement companies for
failure to adequately substantiate claims made in advertising or
for the use of false or misleading advertising claims. These
enforcement actions have often resulted in consent decrees and the
payment of civil penalties, restitution, or both, by the companies
involved. We may be subject to regulation under various state and
local laws that include provisions governing, among other things,
the formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, advertising
and distribution of dietary supplements, foods, cosmetics and OTC
drugs.
In
addition, The National Advertising Division of the Council of
Better Business Bureaus reviews national advertising for
truthfulness and accuracy. The National Advertising Division of the
Council of Better Business Bureaus uses a form of alternative
dispute resolution, working closely with in-house counsel,
marketing executives, research and development departments and
outside consultants to decide whether claims have been
substantiated.
International Regulations
Our
international sales for the consumer products segment and
ingredients segment are subject to foreign government regulations,
which vary substantially from country to country. The time required
to obtain approval by a foreign country may be longer or shorter
than that required for FDA approval, and the requirements may
differ. We may be unable to obtain on a timely basis, if at all,
any foreign government approvals necessary for the marketing of our
products abroad.
Regulation
in Europe is exercised primarily through the European Union, which
regulates the combined market of each of its member states. Other
countries, such as Switzerland, have voluntarily adopted laws and
regulations that mirror those of the European Union with respect to
dietary ingredients.
Major Customers
Major
customers who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s
total sales were as follows:
|
Years
Ended
|
|
Major
Customers
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
A.S.
Watson Group - Related Party
|
15.8%
|
*
|
Life
Extension
|
*
|
10.0%
|
|
|
|
*
Represents less than 10%.
|
|
|
Generally,
we do not depend upon a single customer, or a few customers, and
the loss of any one or more would not have a material adverse
effect on the Company. However, due to the volume of consumer
products and ingredients we are selling in relation to the overall
Company’s sales, we do expect that at times one or more of
our customers may account for more than 10% of the Company’s
sales.
Competitive Business Conditions
For our
consumer products segment, we are in direct competition with
Elysium Health who offers a similar product to our TRU
NIAGEN®. There are also a few resellers of NIAGEN® as
consumer products that are our customers. We believe these
resellers are focused on specific channels that we believe are
complementary to our business.
For our
ingredients segment, we face little direct competition as the
ingredients we offer are backed by intellectual property
exclusively licensed to us. We, however, face strong indirect
competition from other ingredient suppliers who may supply
alternative ingredients that may have similar characteristics to
ingredients we offer. Below is a list of some of the competitors
for our ingredients segment.
Ingredients Business Segment Competitors
●
Royal DSM (the
Netherlands)
●
Glanbia plc
(Ireland)
●
BASF
(Germany)
●
Lonza Group Ltd
(Switzerland)
●
Sabinsa Corporation
(India/USA)
For our
consumer products segment, we employ a variety of strategies to
drive sales and consumer awareness of TRU NIAGEN®, including
social media and internet advertising, managing websites,
influencers, paid spokespersons and talent, events and tradeshows,
e-mail, paid search, distribution of research publications and
press releases. We also have a customer care department that
handles day-to-day communications with our end customers addressing
any needs or concerns related to our TRU NIAGEN®
product.
Analytical Reference Standards and Services Segment
Competitors
●
Sigma-Aldrich
(USA)
●
Phytolab
(Germany)
●
US Pharmacopoeia
(USA)
●
Extrasynthese
(France)
Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises, Concessions, Royalty
Agreements or Labor Contracts, Including Duration
We
currently protect our intellectual property through patents,
trademarks, designs and copyrights on our products and services.
Our business strategy is to use the intellectual property harnessed
from our analytical reference standards and services segment as the
basis for providing new proprietary ingredients to our customers.
Our strategy is to develop these proprietary ingredients on our own
as well as to license our intellectual property to companies who
will commercialize it. We anticipate that the net result will be a
long-term flow of intellectual property milestone and royalty
payments to us.
The
following table sets forth our existing patents and those to which
we have licensed rights:
Patent Number
|
Title
|
Filing Date
|
Issued Date
|
Expires
|
Licensor
|
7,205,284
|
Potent
immunostimulants from microalgae
|
7/10/2001
|
4/17/2007
|
3/9/2022
|
Licensed
from University of Mississippi
|
7,776,326
|
Methods
and compositions for treating neuropathies
|
6/3/2005
|
8/17/2010
|
6/3/2025
|
Licensed
from Washington University
|
7,846,452
|
Potent
immunostimulatory extracts from microalgae
|
7/28/2005
|
10/7/2010
|
7/28/2025
|
Licensed
from University of Mississippi
|
8,106,184
|
Nicotinyl
Riboside Compositions and Methods of Use
|
11/17/2006
|
1/31/2012
|
11/17/2026
|
Licensed
from Cornell University
|
8,114,626
|
Yeast
strain and method for using the same to produce Nicotinamide
Riboside
|
3/26/2009
|
2/14/2012
|
3/26/2029
|
Licensed
from Dartmouth College
|
8,133,917
|
Pterostilbene
as an agonist for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
alpha isoform
|
10/25/2010
|
3/13/2012
|
10/25/2030
|
Licensed
from the University of Mississippi and U.S. Department of
Agriculture
|
8,197,807
|
Nicotinamide
Riboside Kinase compositions and Methods for using the
same
|
11/20/2007
|
6/12/2012
|
11/20/2027
|
Licensed
from Dartmouth College
|
8,252,845
|
Pterostilbene
as an agonist for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
alpha isoform
|
2/1/2012
|
8/28/2012
|
2/1/2032
|
Licensed
from the University of Mississippi and U.S. Department of
Agriculture
|
8,318,807
|
Pterostilbene
Caffeine Co-Crystal Forms
|
7/30/2010
|
11/27/2012
|
7/30/2030
|
Licensed
from Laurus Labs Private Limited
|
8,383,086
|
Nicotinamide
Riboside Kinase compositions and Methods for using the
same
|
4/12/2012
|
2/26/2013
|
4/12/2032
|
Licensed
from Dartmouth College
|
8,399,712
|
Pterostilbene
cocrystals
|
7/30/2010
|
3/19/2013
|
7/30/2020
|
Licensed
from Laurus Labs Private Limited
|
8,524,782
|
Key
intermediate for the preparation of Stilbenes, solid forms of
Pterostilbene, and methods for making the same
|
6/1/2009
|
9/3/2013
|
6/1/2029
|
Licensed
from Laurus Labs Private Limited
|
8,809,400
|
Method
to Ameliorate Oxidative Stress and Improve Working Memory Via
Pterostilbene Administration
|
6/10/2008
|
8/19/2014
|
6/10/2028
|
Licensed
from the University of Mississippi and U.S. Department of
Agriculture
|
8,841,350
|
Method
for treating non-melanoma skin cancer by inducing
UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase activity using
pterostilbene
|
5/8/2012
|
9/22/2014
|
5/8/2032
|
Co-owned
by ChromaDex and University of California
|
8,889,126
|
Methods
and compositions for treating neuropathies
|
5/28/2010
|
11/18/2014
|
5/28/2030
|
Licensed
from Washington University
|
9,000,147
|
Nicotyl
riboside compositions and methods of use
|
1/17/2012
|
4/7/2015
|
1/17/2032
|
Licensed
from Cornell University
|
9,028,887
|
Method
improve spatial memory via pterostilbene
administration
|
5/22/2014
|
5/12/2015
|
5/22/2034
|
Licensed
from the University of Mississippi and U.S. Department of
Agriculture
|
9,295,688
|
Methods
and compositions for treating neuropathies
|
10/10/2014
|
3/29/2016
|
10/10/2034
|
Licensed
from Washington University
|
9,321,797
|
Nicotyl
riboside compositions and methods of use
|
11/17/2014
|
4/26/2016
|
11/17/2034
|
Licensed
from Cornell University
|
9,439,875
|
Anxiolytic
effect of pterostilbene
|
5/11/2011
|
9/13/2016
|
5/11/2031
|
Licensed
from the University of Mississippi and U.S. Department of
Agriculture
|
9,975,915
|
Nicotinamide
riboside kinase compositions and methods for using the
same
|
4/12/2012
|
2/26/2013
|
4/12/2032
|
Licensed
from Dartmouth College
|
10,000,520
|
B-vitamin
and amino acid conjugates ofnicotinoyl ribosides and reduced
nicotinoyl ribosides, derivatives thereof, and methods of
preparation thereof
|
3/16/2017
|
6/19/2018
|
3/16/2037
|
Co-owned
by ChromaDex and The Queen’s University of
Belfast
|
Manufacturing
We
currently utilize third-party manufacturers to produce and supply
dietary supplement, ingredients, products, and services. Following
the receipt of products or product components from third-party
manufacturers, we inspect and ensure conformance of each product
and product component to our specifications. We will also consider
manufacturing certain products or product components internally, if
our capacity permits, when demand or quality requirements make it
appropriate to do so.
We
intend to work with manufacturing companies that can meet the
standards imposed by the FDA, the International Organization for
Standardization and the quality standards that we will require for
our own internal policies and procedures. We expect to monitor and
manage supplier performance through a corrective action program
developed by us. We believe these manufacturing relationships can
minimize our capital investment, help control costs, and allow us
to compete with larger volume manufacturers of dietary supplements,
phytochemicals and ingredients.
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials
For all
three business segments, and subject to the risks related to our
Company and our Business recited below, we believe that we have
identified reliable sources and suppliers of ingredients,
chemicals, phytochemicals and reference materials that will provide
products in compliance with our guidelines.
Research and Development
We have
completed the first human clinical trial on our proprietary
ingredient NIAGEN® and the results demonstrated that a single
dose of NR resulted in statistically significant increases in the
co-enzyme NAD+ in healthy human volunteers. In addition, no adverse
events were observed. In 2015, NIAGEN® was
recognized by the FDA as a “New Dietary Ingredient.”
NIAGEN® was also “Generally Recognized as Safe” by
an independent panel of expert toxicologists and in August 2016,
the FDA issued a GRAS No Objection Letter.
In
2018, we completed a second human clinical trial on NR which
evaluated the effect of repeated doses of NIAGEN® on NAD+
metabolite concentrations in blood, urine and muscle in healthy
adults. This study evaluated the impacts of three dose levels of
NIAGEN® compared to a placebo. One quarter of subjects
received the low dose of NIAGEN® (100 mg), one quarter
received the moderate dose of NIAGEN® (300 mg), one quarter
received the higher dose of NIAGEN® (1,000 mg) and one quarter
received the placebo. The results showed that NAD levels rose in
response to the dose of NIAGEN® and the elevated blood NAD
levels were sustained throughout the eight-week treatment
period.
Through
our research and development laboratory in Longmont, Colorado, we
intend to manufacture at a process scale for products that we are
planning to take to market as well as explore cost saving processes
for existing products.
Research
and development costs for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019,
and December 31, 2018, were approximately $4.4 million and $5.5
million, respectively.
Environmental Compliance
We will
incur significant expense in complying with GMPs and safe handling
and disposal of materials used in our research and manufacturing
activities. We do not anticipate incurring additional material
expense to comply with federal, state and local environmental laws
and regulations.
Working Capital
The
Company’s working capital at the end of years 2019 and 2018
was approximately $4.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively. The
Company measures working capital by adding trade receivables and
inventories, and subtracting accounts payable. Most of the working
capital is consumed by our consumer products segment and
ingredients segment as the operations require a large amount of
inventory to be on hand. As the consumer products segment and
ingredients segment grow, more working capital will likely be
needed to support the operations.
Backlog Orders
For our
consumer products segment where we ship products internationally to
distributors, we may have a backlog from time to time as the
production of TRU NIAGEN® finished bottles require up to three
months lead time by our third-party contract manufacturers. As of
December 31, 2019 we had approximately $1.3 million backlog orders
from the distributors that have not been shipped. For products that
are directly shipped to consumers, we have minimal backlog orders
as we carry inventory on hand to ship upon the receipt of
order.
For our
ingredients segment, we also have minimal backlog orders as we
carry inventory on hand for most of the products we offer and we
ship upon the receipt of customer’s order.
For our
analytical reference standards and services segment, we normally
have a small backlog of orders for reference standards. These
orders amount to approximately $25,000 or less. Because we list
over 1,500 phytochemicals and 300 botanical reference materials in
our catalog, we may not always have the items in stock at the time
of customers’ orders. These backlog orders are normally
fulfilled within 2 to 3 months.
Facilities
For
information on our facilities, see “Properties” in Item
2 of this Form 10-K.
Employees
As of
December 31, 2019, ChromaDex (including Healthspan Research LLC and
ChromaDex Analytics, Inc.) had approximately 110 employees, all of
whom were full-time. We consider our relationships with our
employees to be satisfactory. None of our employees is covered by a
collective bargaining agreement.
Financial Information about Geographic Areas
Please
refer to Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for financial information about
geographic areas.
Available Information
Our Internet website address is www.chromadex.com. Information
found on, or accessible through, our website is not a part of, and
is not incorporated into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make
available free of charge on our website our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current
Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or
furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practical
after we file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities
and Exchange Commission. This information is also available in
print to any stockholder who requests it, with any such requests
addressed to ChromaDex Corporation, 10900 Wilshire Blvd. Ste 600,
Los Angeles, CA 90024. Certain of these documents may also be
obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also
maintains an Internet website that contains reports, and other
information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC
at www.sec.gov. We
also make available free of charge on our website our Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics, and the Charters of our Audit
Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and
Compensation Committee of our Board of
Directors.
Item
1A.
Risk Factors
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
Current investors and potential investors should consider carefully
the risks and uncertainties described below together with all other
information contained in this Form 10-K before making investment
decisions with respect to our common stock. If any of the following
risks occurs, our business, financial condition, results of
operations and our future growth prospects would be materially and
adversely affected. Under these circumstances, the trading price
and value of our common stock could decline, resulting in a loss of
all or part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties
described in this Form 10-K are not the only ones facing our
Company. Additional risks and uncertainties of which we are not
presently aware, or that we currently consider immaterial, may also
affect our business operations.
Risks Related to our Company and our Business
We have a history of operating losses, may need additional
financing to meet our future long-term capital requirements and may
be unable to raise sufficient capital on favorable terms or at
all.
We have
a history of losses and may continue to incur operating and net
losses for the foreseeable future. We incurred net losses of
approximately $32.1 million and $33.3 million for the years ended
December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. As of
December 31, 2019, our accumulated deficit was approximately $121.9
million. We have not achieved profitability on an annual basis. We
may not be able to reach a level of revenue to continue to achieve
and sustain profitability. If our revenues grow slower than
anticipated, or if operating expenses exceed expectations, then we
may not be able to achieve and sustain profitability in the near
future or at all, which may depress our stock price.
As of
December 31, 2019, our cash and cash equivalents totaled
approximately $18.8 million. While we anticipate that our current
cash, cash equivalents and cash to be generated from operations
will be sufficient to meet our projected operating plans through at
least the next twelve months, we may require additional funds,
either through additional equity or debt financings or
collaborative agreements or from other sources. We have no
commitments to obtain such additional financing, and we may not be
able to obtain any such additional financing on terms favorable to
us, or at all. If adequate financing is not available, the Company
will further delay, postpone or terminate product and service
expansion and curtail certain selling, general and administrative
operations. The inability to raise additional financing may have a
material adverse effect on the future performance of the
Company.
Our capital requirements will depend on many factors.
Our
capital requirements will depend on many factors,
including:
●
the
revenues generated by sales of our products;
●
the
costs associated with expanding our sales and marketing efforts,
including efforts to hire independent agents and sales
representatives and obtain required regulatory approvals and
clearances;
●
the
expenses we incur in developing and commercializing our products,
including the cost of obtaining and maintaining regulatory
approvals; and
●
unanticipated
general and administrative expenses, including expenses involved
with our ongoing litigation with Elysium.
Because
of these factors, we may seek to raise additional capital within
the next twelve months both to meet our projected operating plans
after the next twelve months and to fund our longer term strategic
objectives. Additional capital may come from public and private
equity or debt offerings, borrowings under lines of credit or other
sources. These additional funds may not be available on favorable
terms, or at all. There can be no assurance we will be successful
in raising these additional funds. Furthermore, if we issue equity
or debt securities to raise additional funds, our existing
stockholders may experience dilution and the new equity or debt
securities we issue may have rights, preferences and privileges
senior to those of our existing stockholders. In addition, if we
raise additional funds through collaboration, licensing or other
similar arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish valuable
rights to our products or proprietary technologies, or grant
licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we cannot raise
funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to develop or enhance
our products, obtain the required regulatory clearances or
approvals, execute our business plan, take advantage of future
opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated
customer requirements. Any of these events could adversely affect
our ability to achieve our development and commercialization goals,
which could have a material and adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
We are currently engaged in substantial and complex litigation with
Elysium Health, Inc. and Elysium Health LLC ("Elysium"), the
outcome of which could materially harm our business and financial
results.
We are currently engaged in litigation with Elysium, a customer
that represented 19% of our net sales for the year ended December
31, 2016. Elysium has made no purchases from us since August 9,
2016. The litigation includes multiple complaints and counterclaims
by us and Elysium in venues in California and New York, as well as
a patent infringement complaint filed by the Company and Trustees
of Dartmouth College. For further details on this litigation,
please refer to Part I, Item 3 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
The litigation is substantial and complex, and it has caused and
could continue to cause us to incur significant costs, as well as
distract our management over an extended period. The litigation may
substantially disrupt our business and we cannot assure you that we
will be able to resolve the litigation on terms favorable to us. If
we are unsuccessful in resolving the litigation on favorable terms
to us, we may be forced to pay compensatory and punitive damages
and restitution for any royalty payments that we received from
Elysium, which payments could materially harm our business, or be
subject to other remedies, including injunctive relief. In
addition, Elysium has not paid us approximately $2.7 million for
previous purchase orders. We may not collect the full amount owed
to us by Elysium, and as a result, we wrote off the full amount as
uncollectible expense. We cannot predict the outcome of our
litigation with Elysium, which could have any of the results
described above or other results that could materially adversely
affect our business.
Interruptions in our relationships or declines in our business with
major customers could materially harm our business and financial
results.
One of our customers accounted for approximately 16% of our sales
during the year ended December 31, 2019. Any interruption in our
relationship or decline in our business with this customer or other
customers upon whom we become highly dependent could cause harm to
our business. Factors that could influence our relationship with
our customers upon whom we may become highly dependent
include:
●
our
ability to maintain our products at prices that are competitive
with those of our competitors;
●
our
ability to maintain quality levels for our products sufficient to
meet the expectations of our customers;
●
our
ability to produce, ship and deliver a sufficient quantity of our
products in a timely manner to meet the needs of our
customers;
●
our
ability to continue to develop and launch new products that our
customers feel meet their needs and requirements, with respect to
cost, timeliness, features, performance and other
factors;
●
our
ability to provide timely, responsive and accurate customer support
to our customers; and
●
the
ability of our customers to effectively deliver, market and
increase sales of their own products based on ours.
Our financial condition and results of operations for fiscal 2020
may be adversely affected by the recent COVID-19
outbreak.
Our
financial condition and results of operations for fiscal year 2020
may be adversely affected by the recent COVID-19 (also known as
coronavirus) outbreak. The ongoing coronavirus outbreak emanating
from China at the beginning of 2020 has resulted in increased
travel restrictions and extended shutdowns of certain businesses in
the region. A significant portion of our sales are to customers in
Asia and we also have suppliers in Asia. In 2019, approximately 16%
of our revenue was attributed to sales in the Asia region.
Consequently, we are susceptible to factors adversely affecting
this region. The effects could include restrictions on our ability
to travel to support our customers or suppliers located in Asia,
disruptions in our ability to distribute our products in the Asia
region, and/or temporary closures of the facilities of our
customers or suppliers. Disruption to the operations of our
customers or suppliers would likely impact our sales and operating
results. The extent to which the coronavirus impacts our results
will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and
cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge
concerning the severity of the coronavirus and the actions to
contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among
others.
Our future success largely depends on sales of our TRU
NIAGEN®
product.
In
connection with our strategic shift from an ingredient and testing
company to a consumer focused company, we expect to generate a
significant percentage of our future revenue from sales of our TRU
NIAGEN® product. As a result, the market acceptance of TRU
NIAGEN® is critical to our continued success, and if we are
unable to expand market acceptance of TRU NIAGEN®, our
business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and
growth prospects would be materially adversely
affected.
Decline in the state of the global
economy and financial market conditions could adversely affect our
ability to conduct business and our results of
operations.
Global
economic and financial market conditions, including disruptions in
the credit markets and the impact of the global economic
deterioration may materially impact our customers and other parties
with whom we do business. These conditions could negatively affect
our future sales of our ingredient lines as many consumers consider
the purchase of nutritional products discretionary. Decline in
general economic and financial market conditions could materially
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Specifically, the impact of these volatile and negative conditions
may include decreased demand for our products and services, a
decrease in our ability to accurately forecast future product
trends and demand, and a negative impact on our ability to timely
collect receivables from our customers. The foregoing economic
conditions may lead to increased levels of bankruptcies,
restructurings and liquidations for our customers, scaling back of
research and development expenditures, delays in planned projects
and shifts in business strategies for many of our customers. Such
events could, in turn, adversely affect our business through loss
of sales.
We may need to increase the size of our organization, and we can
provide no assurance that we will successfully expand operations or
manage growth effectively.
Our
significant increase in the scope and the scale of our product
launches, including the hiring of additional personnel, has
resulted in significantly higher operating expenses. As a result,
we anticipate that our operating expenses will continue to
increase. Expansion of our operations may also cause a significant
demand on our management, finances and other resources. Our ability
to manage the anticipated future growth, should it occur, will
depend upon a significant expansion of our accounting and other
internal management systems and the implementation and subsequent
improvement of a variety of systems, procedures and controls. There
can be no assurance that significant problems in these areas will
not occur. Any failure to expand these areas and implement and
improve such systems, procedures and controls in an efficient
manner at a pace consistent with our business could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. There can be no assurance that our attempts to expand
our marketing, sales, manufacturing and customer support efforts
will be successful or will result in additional sales or
profitability in any future period. As a result of the expansion of
our operations and the anticipated increase in our operating
expenses, as well as the difficulty in forecasting revenue levels,
we expect to continue to experience significant fluctuations in our
results of operations.
Changes in our business strategy, including entering the consumer
product market, or restructuring of our businesses may increase our
costs or otherwise affect the profitability of our
businesses.
As
changes in our business environment occur we may adjust our
business strategies to meet these changes or we may otherwise
decide to restructure our operations or businesses or assets. In
addition, external events including changing technology, changing
consumer patterns and changes in macroeconomic conditions may
impair the value of our assets. When these changes or events occur,
we may incur costs to change our business strategy and may need to
write down the value of assets. In any of these events, our costs
may increase, we may have significant charges associated with the
write-down of assets or returns on new investments may be lower
than prior to the change in strategy or restructuring. For example,
if we are not successful in developing our consumer product
business, our sales may decrease and our costs may
increase.
The success of our consumer product and ingredient business is
linked to the size and growth rate of the vitamin, mineral and
dietary supplement market and an adverse change in the size or
growth rate of that market could have a material adverse effect on
us.
An
adverse change in the size or growth rate of the vitamin, mineral
and dietary supplement market could have a material adverse effect
on our business. Underlying market conditions are subject to change
based on economic conditions, consumer preferences and other
factors that are beyond our control, including media attention and
scientific research, which may be positive or
negative.
The future growth and profitability of our consumer product
business will depend in large part upon the effectiveness and
efficiency of our marketing efforts and our ability to select
effective markets and media in which to market and
advertise.
Our consumer products business success depends on our ability to
attract and retain customers, which significantly depends on our
marketing practices. Our future growth and profitability will
depend in large part upon the effectiveness and efficiency of our
marketing efforts, including our ability to:
●
create greater awareness of our brand;
●
identify the most effective and efficient levels of spending in
each market, media and specific media vehicle;
●
determine the appropriate creative messages and media mix for
advertising, marketing and promotional expenditures;
●
effectively manage marketing costs (including creative and media)
to maintain acceptable customer acquisition costs;
●
acquire cost-effective television advertising;
●
select the most effective markets, media and specific media
vehicles in which to market and advertise; and
●
convert consumer inquiries into actual orders.
Unfavorable publicity or consumer perception of our products and
any similar products distributed by other companies could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
We
believe the nutritional supplement market is highly dependent upon
consumer perception regarding the safety, efficacy and quality of
nutritional supplements generally, as well as of products
distributed specifically by us. Consumer perception of our products
can be significantly influenced by scientific research or findings,
regulatory investigations, litigation, national media attention and
other publicity regarding the consumption of nutritional
supplements. We cannot assure you that future scientific research,
findings, regulatory proceedings, litigation, media attention or
other favorable research findings or publicity will be favorable to
the nutritional supplement market or any product, or consistent
with earlier publicity. Future research reports, findings,
regulatory proceedings, litigation, media attention or other
publicity that are perceived as less favorable than, or that
question, such earlier research reports, findings or publicity
could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products
and consequently on our business, results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.
Our
dependence upon consumer perceptions means that adverse scientific
research reports, findings, regulatory proceedings, litigation,
media attention or other publicity, if accurate or with merit,
could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products, the
availability and pricing of our ingredients, and our business,
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Further,
adverse public reports or other media attention regarding the
safety, efficacy and quality of nutritional supplements in general,
or our products specifically, or associating the consumption of
nutritional supplements with illness, could have such a material
adverse effect. Any such adverse public reports or other
media attention could arise even if the adverse effects associated
with such products resulted from consumers’ failure to
consume such products appropriately or as directed and the content
of such public reports and other media attention may be beyond our
control.
We may incur material product
liability claims, which could increase our costs and adversely
affect our reputation, revenues and operating
income.
As a
consumer product and ingredient supplier we market and manufacture
products designed for human and animal consumption, we are subject
to product liability claims if the use of our products is alleged
to have resulted in injury. Our products consist of vitamins,
minerals, herbs and other ingredients that are classified as food
ingredients, dietary supplements, or natural health products, and,
in most cases, are not necessarily subject to pre-market regulatory
approval in the United States. Some of our products contain
innovative ingredients that do not have long histories of human
consumption. Previously unknown adverse reactions resulting from
human consumption of these ingredients could occur. In addition,
the products we sell are produced by third-party manufacturers. As
a marketer of products manufactured by third parties, we also may
be liable for various product liability claims for products we do
not manufacture. We may, in the future, be subject to various
product liability claims, including, among others, that our
products include inadequate instructions for use or inadequate
warnings concerning possible side effects and interactions with
other substances. A product liability claim against us could result
in increased costs and could adversely affect our reputation with
our customers, which, in turn, could have a materially adverse
effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows.
We acquire ingredients for our
products from foreign suppliers, and may be negatively affected by
the risks associated with international trade and importation
issues.
We
acquire ingredients for a number of our products from suppliers
outside of the United States. Accordingly, the
acquisition of these ingredients is subject to the risks generally
associated with importing raw materials, including, among other
factors, delays in shipments, changes in economic and political
conditions, quality assurance, health epidemics affecting the
region of such suppliers (including the coronavirus), nonconformity
to specifications or laws and regulations, tariffs, trade disputes
and foreign currency fluctuations. While we
have a supplier certification program and audit and inspect our
suppliers’ facilities as necessary both in the United States
and internationally, we cannot assure you that raw materials
received from suppliers outside of the United States will conform
to all specifications, laws and regulations. There have
in the past been quality and safety issues in our industry with
certain items imported from overseas. We may incur
additional expenses and experience shipment delays due to
preventative measures adopted by the U.S. governments, our
suppliers and our company.
The insurance industry has become
more selective in offering some types of coverage and we may not be
able to obtain insurance coverage in the
future.
The
insurance industry has become more selective in offering some types
of insurance, such as product liability, product recall, property
and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. Our
current insurance program is consistent with both our past level of
coverage and our risk management policies. However, we cannot
assure you that we will be able to obtain comparable insurance
coverage on favorable terms, or at all, in the
future. Certain of our customers as well as prospective
customers require that we maintain minimum levels of coverage for
our products. Lack of coverage or coverage below these minimum
required levels could cause these customers to materially change
business terms or to cease doing business with us
entirely.
If we experience product recalls, we may incur significant and
unexpected costs, and our business reputation could be adversely
affected.
We may be exposed to product recalls and adverse public relations
if our products are alleged to be mislabeled or to cause injury or
illness, or if we are alleged to have violated governmental
regulations. A product recall could result in substantial and
unexpected expenditures, which would reduce operating profit and
cash flow. In addition, a product recall may require significant
management attention. Product recalls may hurt the value of our
brands and lead to decreased demand for our products. Product
recalls also may lead to increased scrutiny by federal, state or
international regulatory agencies of our operations and increased
litigation and could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows.
We depend on key personnel, the
loss of any of which could negatively affect our
business.
We
depend greatly on Frank L. Jaksch Jr., Robert N. Fried, Kevin M.
Farr, and Mark J. Friedman, who are our Executive Chairman of the
Board, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General
Counsel, respectively. We also depend greatly on other key
employees, including key scientific and marketing personnel. In
general, only highly qualified and trained scientists have the
necessary skills to develop our products and provide our services.
Only marketing personnel with specific experience and knowledge in
health care are able to effectively market our
products. In addition, some of our manufacturing,
quality control, safety and compliance, information technology,
sales and e-commerce related positions are highly technical as
well. We face intense competition for these professionals from our
competitors, customers, marketing partners and other companies
throughout the
industries in which we compete. Our success will depend, in part,
upon our ability to attract and retain additional skilled
personnel, which will require substantial additional funds. There
can be no assurance that we will be able to find and attract
additional qualified employees or retain any such personnel. Our
inability to hire qualified personnel, the loss of services of our
key personnel, or the loss of services of executive officers or key
employees that may be hired in the future may have a material and
adverse effect on our business.
Our operating results may fluctuate significantly as a result of a
variety of factors, many of which are outside of our
control.
We are
subject to the following factors, among others, that may negatively
affect our operating results:
●
the
announcement or introduction of new products by our
competitors;
●
our
ability to upgrade and develop our systems and infrastructure to
accommodate growth;
●
the
decision by significant customers to reduce purchases;
●
disputes
and litigation with competitors;
●
our
ability to attract and retain key personnel in a timely and
cost-effective manner;
●
technical
difficulties;
●
the
amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures
relating to the expansion of our business, operations and
infrastructure;
●
regulation
by federal, state or local governments; and
●
general
economic conditions as well as economic conditions specific to the
healthcare industry.
As a
result of our limited operating history and the nature of the
markets in which we compete, it is extremely difficult for us to
make accurate forecasts. We have based our current and future
expense levels largely on our investment plans and estimates of
future events although certain of our expense levels are, to a
large extent, fixed. Assuming our products reach the market, we may
be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for
any unexpected revenue shortfall. Accordingly, any significant
shortfall in revenues relative to our planned expenditures would
have an immediate adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition. Further, as a strategic
response to changes in the competitive environment, we may from
time to time make certain pricing, service or marketing decisions
that could have a material and adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition. Due to the foregoing
factors, our revenues and operating results are and will remain
difficult to forecast.
We face significant competition, including changes in
pricing.
The
markets for our products and services are both competitive and
price sensitive. Many of our competitors have significant
financial, operations, sales and marketing resources and experience
in research and development. Competitors could develop new
technologies that compete with our products and services or even
render our products obsolete. If a competitor develops superior
technology or cost-effective alternatives to our products and
services, our business could be seriously harmed.
The
markets for some of our products are also subject to specific
competitive risks because these markets are highly price
competitive. Our competitors have competed in the past by lowering
prices on certain products. If they do so again, we may be forced
to respond by lowering our prices. This would reduce sales revenues
and increase losses. Failure to anticipate and respond to price
competition may also impact sales and aggravate
losses.
We
believe that customers in our markets display a significant amount
of loyalty to their supplier of a particular product. To the extent
we are not the first to develop, offer and/or supply new products,
customers may buy from our competitors or make materials
themselves, causing our competitive position to
suffer.
Many of our competitors are larger and have greater financial and
other resources than we do.
Our
products compete and will compete with other similar products
produced by our competitors. These competitive products could be
marketed by well-established, successful companies that possess
greater financial, marketing, distributional, personnel and other
resources than we possess. Using these resources, these companies
can implement extensive advertising and promotional campaigns, both
generally and in response to specific marketing efforts by
competitors, and enter into new markets more rapidly to introduce
new products. In certain instances, competitors with greater
financial resources also may be able to enter a market in direct
competition with us, offering attractive marketing tools to
encourage the sale of products that compete with our products or
present cost features that consumers may find
attractive.
We may never develop any additional products to
commercialize.
We have
invested a substantial amount of our time and resources in
developing various new products. Commercialization of these
products will require additional development, clinical evaluation,
regulatory approval, significant marketing efforts and substantial
additional investment before they can provide us with any revenue.
Despite our efforts, these products may not become commercially
successful products for a number of reasons, including but not
limited to:
●
we may
not be able to obtain regulatory approvals for our products, or the
approved indication may be narrower than we seek;
●
our
products may not prove to be safe and effective in clinical
trials;
●
we may
experience delays in our development program;
●
any
products that are approved may not be accepted in the
marketplace;
●
we may
not have adequate financial or other resources to complete the
development or to commence the commercialization of our products or
will not have adequate financial or other resources to achieve
significant commercialization of our products;
●
we may
not be able to manufacture any of our products in commercial
quantities or at an acceptable cost;
●
rapid
technological change may make our products obsolete;
●
we may
be unable to effectively protect our intellectual property rights
or we may become subject to claims that our activities have
infringed the intellectual property rights of others;
and
●
we may
be unable to obtain or defend patent rights for our
products.
In
addition, we may never achieve technical feasibility under the
supply agreement with Nestec Ltd., and therefore Nestec Ltd. may
never commercialize a product using NIAGEN®.
We may not be able to partner with others for technological
capabilities and new products and services.
Our
ability to remain competitive may depend, in part, on our ability
to continue to seek partners that can offer technological
improvements and improve existing products and services that are
offered to our customers. We are committed to attempting to keep
pace with technological change, to stay abreast of technology
changes and to look for partners that will develop new products and
services for our customer base. We cannot assure prospective
investors that we will be successful in finding partners or be able
to continue to incorporate new developments in technology, to
improve existing products and services, or to develop successful
new products and services, nor can we be certain that newly
developed products and services will perform satisfactorily or be
widely accepted in the marketplace or that the costs involved in
these efforts will not be substantial.
If we fail to maintain adequate quality standards for our products
and services, our business may be adversely affected and our
reputation harmed.
Dietary
supplement, nutraceutical, food and beverage, functional food,
analytical laboratories, pharmaceutical and cosmetic customers are
often subject to rigorous quality standards to obtain and maintain
regulatory approval of their products and the manufacturing
processes that generate them. A failure to maintain, or, in some
instances, upgrade our quality standards to meet our
customers’ needs, could cause damage to our reputation and
potentially substantial sales losses.
Our ability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary
technology through patents and other means is uncertain and may be
inadequate, which would have a material and adverse effect on
us.
Our
success depends significantly on our ability to protect our
proprietary rights to the technologies used in our products. We
rely on patent protection, as well as a combination of copyright,
trade secret and trademark laws and nondisclosure, confidentiality
and other contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary
technology, including our licensed technology. However, these legal
means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect
our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage.
For example, our pending United States and foreign patent
applications may not issue as patents in a form that will be
advantageous to us or may issue and be subsequently successfully
challenged by others and invalidated. In addition, our pending
patent applications include claims to material aspects of our
products and procedures that are not currently protected by issued
patents. Both the patent application process and the process of
managing patent disputes can be time consuming and expensive.
Competitors may be able to design around our patents or develop
products which provide outcomes which are comparable or even
superior to ours. Steps that we have taken to protect our
intellectual property and proprietary technology, including
entering into confidentiality agreements and intellectual property
assignment agreements with some of our officers, employees,
consultants and advisors, may not provide us with meaningful
protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary information
in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or other breaches of
the agreements. Furthermore, the laws of foreign countries may not
protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do
the laws of the United States.
In the
event a competitor infringes our licensed or pending patent or
other intellectual property rights, enforcing those rights may be
costly, uncertain, difficult and time consuming. Even if
successful, litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights
or to defend our patents against challenge could be expensive and
time consuming and could divert our management’s attention.
We may not have sufficient resources to enforce our intellectual
property rights or to defend our patents rights against a
challenge. The failure to obtain patents and/or protect our
intellectual property rights could have a material and adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our patents and licenses may be subject to challenge on validity
grounds, and our patent applications may be rejected.
We rely
on our patents, patent applications, licenses and other
intellectual property rights to give us a competitive advantage.
Whether a patent is valid, or whether a patent application should
be granted, is a complex matter of science and law, and therefore
we cannot be certain that, if challenged, our patents, patent
applications and/or other intellectual property rights would be
upheld. If one or more of those patents, patent applications,
licenses and other intellectual property rights are invalidated,
rejected or found unenforceable, that could reduce or eliminate any
competitive advantage we might otherwise have had.
We may become subject to claims of infringement or misappropriation
of the intellectual property rights of others, which could prohibit
us from developing our products, require us to obtain licenses from
third parties or to develop non-infringing alternatives and subject
us to substantial monetary damages.
Third
parties could, in the future, assert infringement or
misappropriation claims against us with respect to products we
develop. Whether a product infringes a patent or misappropriates
other intellectual property involves complex legal and factual
issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. Therefore,
we cannot be certain that we have not infringed the intellectual
property rights of others. There may be third-party patents or
patent applications with claims to materials, formulations, methods
of manufacture or methods for use related to the use or manufacture
of our products, and our potential competitors may assert that some
aspect of our product infringes their patents. Because patent
applications may take years to issue, there also may be
applications now pending of which we are unaware that may later
result in issued patents upon which our products could infringe.
There also may be existing patents or pending patent applications
of which we are unaware upon which our products may inadvertently
infringe.
Any
infringement or misappropriation claim could cause us to incur
significant costs, place significant strain on our financial
resources, divert management’s attention from our business
and harm our reputation. If the relevant patents in such claim were
upheld as valid and enforceable and we were found to infringe them,
we could be prohibited from manufacturing or selling any product
that is found to infringe unless we could obtain licenses to use
the technology covered by the patent or are able to design around
the patent. We may be unable to obtain such a license on terms
acceptable to us, if at all, and we may not be able to redesign our
products to avoid infringement, which could materially impact our
revenue. A court could also order us to pay compensatory damages
for such infringement, plus prejudgment interest and could, in
addition, treble the compensatory damages and award attorney fees.
These damages could be substantial and could harm our reputation,
business, financial condition and operating results. A court also
could enter orders that temporarily, preliminarily or permanently
enjoin us and our customers from making, using, or selling
products, and could enter an order mandating that we undertake
certain remedial activities. Depending on the nature of the relief
ordered by the court, we could become liable for additional damages
to third parties.
The prosecution and enforcement of patents licensed to us by third
parties are not within our control. Without these technologies, our
products may not be successful and our business would be harmed if
the patents were infringed on or misappropriated without action by
such third parties.
We have
obtained licenses from third parties for patents and patent
application rights related to the products we are developing,
allowing us to use intellectual property rights owned by or
licensed to these third parties. We do not control the maintenance,
prosecution, enforcement or strategy for many of these patents or
patent application rights and as such are dependent in part on the
owners of the intellectual property rights to maintain their
viability. If any third party licensor is unable to successfully
maintain, prosecute or enforce the licensed patents and/or patent
application rights related to our products, we may become subject
to infringement or misappropriate claims or lose our competitive
advantage. Without access to these technologies or suitable
design-around or alternative technology options, our ability to
conduct our business could be impaired significantly.
We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we, our
employees, or our independent contractors have wrongfully used or
disclosed alleged trade secrets of others.
Some of
our employees were previously employed at other dietary supplement,
nutraceutical, food and beverage, functional food, analytical
laboratories, pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies. We may also
hire additional employees who are currently employed at other such
companies, including our competitors. Additionally, consultants or
other independent agents with which we may contract may be or have
been in a contractual arrangement with one or more of our
competitors. We may be subject to claims that these employees or
independent contractors have used or disclosed such other
party’s trade secrets or other proprietary information.
Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if
we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation
could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to our
management. If we fail to defend such claims, in addition to paying
monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights
or personnel. A loss of key personnel or their work product could
hamper or prevent our ability to market existing or new products,
which could severely harm our business.
Litigation may harm our business.
Substantial,
complex or extended litigation could cause us to incur significant
costs and distract our management. For example, lawsuits by
employees, stockholders, collaborators, distributors, customers,
competitors or others could be very costly and substantially
disrupt our business. Disputes from time to time with such
companies, organizations or individuals are not uncommon, and we
cannot assure you that we will always be able to resolve such
disputes or on terms favorable to us. As further described in Part
I, Item 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are currently
involved in substantial and complex litigation with Elysium.
Unexpected results could cause us to have financial exposure in
these matters in excess of recorded reserves and insurance
coverage, requiring us to provide additional reserves to address
these liabilities, therefore impacting profits.
Our sales and results of operations for our analytical reference
standards and services segment depend on our customers’
research and development efforts and their ability to obtain
funding for these efforts.
Our
analytical reference standards and services segment customers
include researchers at pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies,
chemical and related companies, academic institutions, government
laboratories and private foundations. Fluctuations in the research
and development budgets of these researchers and their
organizations could have a significant effect on the demand for our
products. Our customers determine their research and development
budgets based on several factors, including the need to develop new
products, the availability of governmental and other funding,
competition and the general availability of resources. As we
continue to expand our international operations, we expect research
and development spending levels in markets outside of the United
States will become increasingly important to us.
Research
and development budgets fluctuate due to changes in available
resources, spending priorities, general economic conditions,
institutional and governmental budgetary limitations and mergers of
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Our business could be
harmed by any significant decrease in life science and high
technology research and development expenditures by our customers.
In particular, a small portion of our sales has been to researchers
whose funding is dependent on grants from government agencies such
as the United States National Institute of Health, the National
Science Foundation, the National Cancer Institute and similar
agencies or organizations. Government funding of research and
development is subject to the political process, which is often
unpredictable. Other departments, such as Homeland Security or
Defense, or general efforts to reduce the United States federal
budget deficit could be viewed by the government as a higher
priority. Any shift away from funding of life science and high
technology research and development or delays surrounding the
approval of governmental budget proposals may cause our customers
to delay or forego purchases of our products and services, which
could seriously damage our business.
Some of
our customers receive funds from approved grants at a particular
time of year, many times set by government budget cycles. In the
past, such grants have been frozen for extended periods or have
otherwise become unavailable to various institutions without
notice. The timing of the receipt of grant funds may affect the
timing of purchase decisions by our customers and, as a result,
cause fluctuations in our sales and operating results.
Demand for our products and services are subject to the commercial
success of our customers’ products, which may vary for
reasons outside our control.
Even if
we are successful in securing utilization of our products in a
customer’s manufacturing process, sales of many of our
products and services remain dependent on the timing and volume of
the customer’s production, over which we have no control. The
demand for our products depends on regulatory approvals and
frequently depends on the commercial success of the
customer’s supported product. Regulatory processes are
complex, lengthy, expensive, and can often take years to
complete.
We may bear financial risk if we under-price our contracts or
overrun cost estimates.
In
cases where our contracts are structured as fixed price or
fee-for-service with a cap, we bear the financial risk if we
initially under-price our contracts or otherwise overrun our cost
estimates. Such underpricing or significant cost overruns could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We rely on single or a limited number of third-party suppliers for
the raw materials required to produce our products.
Our
dependence on a limited number of third-party suppliers or on a
single supplier, and the challenges we may face in obtaining
adequate supplies of raw materials, involve several risks,
including limited control over pricing, availability, health
epidemics affecting the region of such suppliers (including the
coronavirus), quality and delivery schedules. We cannot be certain
that our current suppliers will continue to provide us with the
quantities of these raw materials that we require or satisfy our
anticipated specifications and quality requirements. Any supply
interruption in limited or sole sourced raw materials could
materially harm our ability to manufacture our products until a new
source of supply, if any, could be identified and qualified.
Although we believe there are other suppliers of these raw
materials, we may be unable to find a sufficient alternative supply
channel in a reasonable time or on commercially reasonable terms.
Any performance failure on the part of our suppliers could delay
the development and commercialization of our products, or interrupt
production of then existing products that are already marketed,
which would have a material adverse effect on our
business.
We may not
be successful in acquiring complementary businesses or products on
favorable terms.
As part of our business strategy, we intend to consider
acquisitions of similar or complementary businesses or products. No
assurance can be given that we will be successful in identifying
attractive acquisition candidates or completing acquisitions on
favorable terms. In addition, any future acquisitions will be
accompanied by the risks commonly associated with acquisitions.
These risks include potential exposure to unknown liabilities of
acquired companies or to acquisition costs and expenses, the
difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and personnel
of the acquired companies, the potential disruption to the business
of the combined company and potential diversion of our management's
time and attention, the impairment of relationships with and the
possible loss of key employees and clients as a result of the
changes in management, the incurrence of amortization expenses and
write-downs and dilution to the shareholders of the combined
company if the acquisition is made for stock of the combined
company. In addition, successful completion of an acquisition may
depend on consents from third parties, including regulatory
authorities and private parties, which consents are beyond our
control. There can be no assurance that products, technologies or
businesses of acquired companies will be effectively assimilated
into the business or product offerings of the combined company or
will have a positive effect on the combined company's revenues or
earnings. Further, the combined company may incur significant
expense to complete acquisitions and to support the acquired
products and businesses. Any such acquisitions may be funded with
cash, debt or equity, which could have the effect of diluting or
otherwise adversely affecting the holdings or the rights of our
existing stockholders.
If we experience a significant disruption in our information
technology systems or if we fail to implement new systems and
software successfully, our business could be adversely
affected.
We
depend on information systems throughout our company to control our
manufacturing processes, process orders, manage inventory, process
and bill shipments and collect cash from our customers, respond to
customer inquiries, contribute to our overall internal control
processes, maintain records of our property, plant and equipment,
and record and pay amounts due vendors and other creditors. If we
were to experience a prolonged disruption in our information
systems that involve interactions with customers and suppliers, it
could result in the loss of sales and customers and/or increased
costs, which could adversely affect our overall business
operation.
If we are unable to maintain sales, marketing and distribution
capabilities or maintain arrangements with third parties to sell,
market and distribute our products, our business may be
harmed.
To
achieve commercial success for our products, we must sell our
product lines and/or technologies at favorable prices. In addition
to being expensive, maintaining such a sales force is
time-consuming. Qualified direct sales personnel with experience in
the natural products industry are in high demand, and there can be
no assurance that we will be able to hire or retain an effective
direct sales team. Similarly, qualified independent sales
representatives both within and outside the United States are in
high demand, and we may not be able to build an effective network
for the distribution of our product through such representatives.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into
contracts with representatives on terms acceptable to us.
Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to
build an alternate distribution framework should we attempt to do
so.
We may
also need to contract with third parties in order to market our
products. To the extent that we enter into arrangements with third
parties to perform marketing and distribution services, our product
revenue could be lower and our costs higher than if we directly
marketed our products. Furthermore, to the extent that we enter
into co-promotion or other marketing and sales arrangements with
other companies, any revenue received will depend on the skills and
efforts of others, and we do not know whether these efforts will be
successful. If we are unable to establish and maintain adequate
sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, independently or
with others, we will not be able to generate product revenue, and
may not become profitable.
Our business could be negatively impacted by cyber security
threats.
In the
ordinary course of our business, we use our data centers and our
networks to store and access our proprietary business information.
We face various cyber security threats, including cyber security
attacks to our information technology infrastructure and attempts
by others to gain access to our proprietary or sensitive
information. Information security risks have significantly
increased in recent years in part due to the proliferation of new
technologies and the increased sophistication and activities of
organized crime, hackers, data and related privacy breaches,
terrorists and other external parties, including foreign private
parties and state actors. The procedures and controls we use to
monitor these threats and mitigate our exposure may not be
sufficient to prevent cyber security incidents. The result of these
incidents could include disrupted operations, lost opportunities,
misstated financial data, liability for stolen assets or
information, theft of our intellectual property, loss of data and
other personally identifiable information, increased costs arising
from the implementation of additional security protective measures,
litigation and reputational damage. Any remedial costs or other
liabilities related to cyber security incidents may not be fully
insured or indemnified by other means.
Compliance with global privacy and data security requirements could
result in additional costs and liabilities to us or inhibit our
ability to collect and, if applicable, process data globally, and
the failure to comply with such requirements could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
The
regulatory framework for the collection, use, safeguarding,
sharing, transfer and other processing of information worldwide is
rapidly evolving and is likely to remain uncertain for the
foreseeable future. For example, the European Union’s General
Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) imposes strict
obligations on the processing of personal data, including, without
limitation, personal health data, and the free movement of such
data. The GDPR applies to any company established in the European
Union as well as any company outside the European Union that
processes personal data in connection with the offering of goods or
services to individuals in the European Union or the monitoring of
their behavior. The GDPR provides data protection obligations for
processors and controllers of personal data, including, for
example, obligations relating to: processing health and other
sensitive data; obtaining consent of individuals; providing notice
to individuals regarding data processing activities; respondingto
data subject requests; taking certain measures when engaging
third-party processors; notifying data subjects and regulators of
data breaches; implementing safeguards to protect the security and
confidentiality of personal data; and transferring personal data to
countries outside the European Union, including the U.S. The GDPR
imposes fines for breaches of data protection requirements and
provides other remedies for parties who suffer harm as a result of
a data breach. The GDPR and other changes in laws or regulations
associated with the enhanced protection of certain types of
sensitive data, such as healthcare data or other personal
information from our clinical trials, could require us to change
our business practices or lead to government enforcement actions,
private litigation or significant penalties against us and could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
or results of operations.
Additionally,
California recently enacted legislation that has been dubbed the
first “GDPR-like” law in the U.S. Known as the
California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”), it
creates new individual privacy rights for consumers (as that word
is broadly defined in the law) and places increased privacy and
security obligations on entities handling personal data of
consumers. The CCPA, which went into effect on January 1, 2020,
requires covered companies to provide new disclosures to California
consumers, and provides such consumers new ways to opt-out of
certain sales of personal information. The CCPA provides for
penalties for violations, as well as other remedies for parties who
suffer harm as a result of a data breach, which may increase data
breach litigation. The CCPA may increase our compliance costs and
potential liability.
We are subject to financial and operating covenants in our business
financing agreement with Western Alliance Bank (the “Credit
Agreement”) and any failure to comply with such covenants, or
obtain waivers in the event of non-compliance, could limit our
borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement, resulting in our
being unable to borrow under the Credit Agreement and materially
adversely impact our liquidity. In addition, our operations may not
provide sufficient cash to meet the repayment obligations of debt
incurred under the Credit Agreement.
The
Credit Agreement contains affirmative and restrictive covenants,
including covenants regarding delivery of financial statements,
maintenance of inventory, payment of taxes, maintenance of
insurance, dispositions of property, business combinations or
acquisitions and incurrence of additional indebtedness, among other
customary covenants, in each case subject to limited
exceptions.
There
can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the
financial and other covenants in the Credit Agreement. Our failure
to comply with these covenants could cause us to be unable to
borrow under the Credit Agreement and may constitute an event of
default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the
acceleration of the maturity of any indebtedness then outstanding
under the Credit Agreement, which would require us to pay all
amounts then outstanding. If we are unable to repay those amounts,
Western Alliance Bank could proceed against the collateral granted
to them to secure that debt, which would seriously harm our
business. Such an event could materially adversely affect our
financial condition and liquidity. Additionally, such events of
non-compliance could impact the terms of any additional borrowings
and/or any credit renewal terms. Any failure to comply with such
covenants may be a disclosable event and may be perceived
negatively. Such perception could adversely affect the market price
for our common stock and our ability to obtain financing in the
future.
Risks Related to Regulatory Approval of Our Products and Other
Government Regulations
We are subject to regulation by various federal, state and foreign
agencies that require us to comply with a wide variety of
regulations, including those regarding the manufacture of products,
advertising and product label claims, the distribution of our
products and environmental matters. Failure to comply with these
regulations could subject us to fines, penalties and additional
costs.
Some of
our operations are subject to regulation by various United States
federal agencies and similar state and international agencies,
including the Department of Commerce, the FDA, the FTC, the
Department of Transportation and the Department of Agriculture.
These regulations govern a wide variety of product activities, from
design and development to labeling, manufacturing, handling, sales
and distribution of products. If we fail to comply with any of
these regulations, we may be subject to fines or penalties, have to
recall products and/or cease their manufacture and distribution,
which would increase our costs and reduce our sales.
We are
also subject to various federal, state, local and international
laws and regulations that govern the handling, transportation,
manufacture, use and sale of substances that are or could be
classified as toxic or hazardous substances. Some risk of
environmental damage is inherent in our operations and the products
we manufacture, sell, or distribute. Any failure by us to comply
with the applicable government regulations could also result in
product recalls or impositions of fines and restrictions on our
ability to carry on with or expand in a portion or possibly all of
our operations. If we fail to comply with any or all of these
regulations, we may be subject to fines or penalties, have to
recall products and/or cease their manufacture and distribution,
which would increase our costs and reduce our sales.
Government regulations of our customer’s business are
extensive and are constantly changing. Changes in these regulations
can significantly affect customer demand for our products and
services.
The
process by which our customers’ industries are regulated is
controlled by government agencies and depending on the market
segment can be very expensive, time consuming, and uncertain.
Changes in regulations or the enforcement practices of current
regulations could have a negative impact on our customers and, in
turn, our business. At this time, it is unknown how the FDA will
interpret and to what extent it will enforce GMPs, regulations that
will likely affect many of our customers. These uncertainties may
have a material impact on our results of operations, as lack of
enforcement or an interpretation of the regulations that lessens
the burden of compliance for the dietary supplement marketplace may
cause a reduced demand for our products and services.
Changes in government regulation or in practices relating to the
pharmaceutical, dietary supplement, food and cosmetic industry
could decrease the need for the services we provide.
Governmental
agencies throughout the world, including in the United States,
strictly regulate the pharmaceutical, dietary supplement, food and
cosmetic industries. Our business involves helping pharmaceutical
and biotechnology companies navigate the regulatory drug approval
process. Changes in regulation, such as a relaxation in regulatory
requirements or the introduction of simplified drug approval
procedures, or an increase in regulatory requirements that we have
difficulty satisfying or that make our services less competitive,
could eliminate or substantially reduce the demand for our
services. Also, if the government makes efforts to contain drug
costs and pharmaceutical and biotechnology company profits from new
drugs, our customers may spend less, or reduce their spending on
research and development. If health insurers were to change their
practices with respect to reimbursements for pharmaceutical
products, our customers may spend less, or reduce their spending on
research and development.
If we should in the future become required to obtain regulatory
approval to market and sell our goods we will not be able to
generate any revenues until such approval is received.
The
pharmaceutical industry is subject to stringent regulation by a
wide range of authorities. While we believe that, given our present
business, we are not currently required to obtain regulatory
approval to market our goods because, among other things, we do not
(i) produce or market any clinical devices or other products, or
(ii) sell any medical products or services to the customer, we
cannot predict whether regulatory clearance will be required in the
future and, if so, whether such clearance will at such time be
obtained for any products that we are developing or may attempt to
develop. Should such regulatory approval in the future be required,
our goods may be suspended or may not be able to be marketed and
sold in the United States until we have completed the regulatory
clearance process as and if implemented by the FDA. Satisfaction of
regulatory requirements typically takes many years, is dependent
upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product or service and
would require the expenditure of substantial
resources.
If
regulatory clearance of a good that we propose to propose to market
and sell is granted, this clearance may be limited to those
particular states and conditions for which the good is demonstrated
to be safe and effective, which would limit our ability to generate
revenue. We cannot ensure that any good that we develop will meet
all of the applicable regulatory requirements needed to receive
marketing clearance. Failure to obtain regulatory approval will
prevent commercialization of our goods where such clearance is
necessary. There can be no assurance that we will obtain regulatory
approval of our proposed goods that may require it.
Risks Related to the Securities Markets and Ownership of our Equity
Securities
The market price of our common stock may be volatile and adversely
affected by several factors.
The
market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly in
response to various factors and events, including, but not limited
to:
●
our ability to
integrate operations, technology, products and
services;
●
our ability to
execute our business plan;
●
our operating
results are below expectations;
●
our issuance of
additional securities, including debt or equity or a combination
thereof,;
●
announcements of
technological innovations or new products by us or our
competitors;
●
acceptance of and
demand for our products by consumers;
●
media coverage
regarding our industry or us;
●
litigation;
●
disputes with or
our inability to collect from significant customers;
●
loss of any
strategic relationship;
●
industry
developments, including, without limitation, changes in healthcare
policies or practices;
●
economic and other
external factors;
●
reductions in
purchases from our large customers;
●
period-to-period
fluctuations in our financial results; and
●
whether an active
trading market in our common stock develops and is
maintained.
In
addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced
significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the
operating performance of particular companies. These market
fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market
price of our common stock.
Our shares of common stock may be thinly traded, so you may be
unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all.
We
cannot predict the extent to which an active public market for our
common stock will develop or be sustained. This situation may be
attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are
a small company that is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock
brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment
community who generate or influence sales volume, and that even if
we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk
averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as
ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such
time as we have become more seasoned and viable. As a consequence,
there may be periods of several days or weeks when trading activity
in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned
issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that
will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect
on share price. We cannot assure you that a broader or more active
public trading market for our common stock will develop or be
sustained, or that current trading levels will be sustained or not
diminish.
We have not paid cash dividends in the past and do not expect to
pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any return on
investment may be limited to the value of our common
stock.
We have
never paid cash dividends on our capital stock and do not
anticipate paying cash dividends on our capital stock in the
foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on our capital stock
will depend on our earnings, financial condition and other business
and economic factors affecting us at such time as the board of
directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends, our
common stock may be less valuable because a return on your
investment will only occur if the common stock price
appreciates.
Changes in tax laws or regulations that are applied adversely to us
or our customers may have a material adverse effect on our
business, cash flow, financial condition or results of
operations.
New
income, sales, use or other tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations
or ordinances could be enacted at any time, which could adversely
affect our business operations and financial performance. Further,
existing tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could
be interpreted, changed, modified or applied adversely to us. For
example, legislation enacted in 2017 informally titled the Tax Cuts
and Jobs Act enacted many significant changes to the U.S. tax laws.
Future guidance from the Internal Revenue Service and other tax
authorities with respect to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act may affect
us, and certain aspects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act could be
repealed or modified in future legislation. In addition, it is
uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act or any newly enacted federal tax legislation.
Changes in corporate tax rates, the realization of net deferred tax
assets relating to our operations, the taxation of foreign
earnings, and the deductibility of expenses under the Tax Cuts and
Jobs Act or future reform legislation could have a material impact
on the value of our deferred tax assets, could result in
significant one-time charges, and could increase our future U.S.
tax expense.
Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain
other tax attributes may be limited.
Our
federal net operating losses (“NOL”s) generated in
taxable years ending prior to 2018 could expire unused. Under the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, federal NOLs incurred in taxable years
ending after December 31, 2017, may be carried forward
indefinitely, but the deductibility of federal NOLs generated in
tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, is limited. It is
uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. In addition, under Sections 382 and 383
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and corresponding
provisions of state law, if a corporation undergoes an
“ownership change,” which is generally defined as a
greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over a
three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its
pre-change NOL carryforwards, or NOLs, and other pre-change tax
attributes (such as research tax credits) to offset its post-change
income or taxes may be limited. We may experience ownership changes
in the future as a result of subsequent shifts in our stock
ownership some of which may be outside of our control. As a result,
if we earn net taxable income, our ability to use our pre-ownership
change NOL carryforwards to offset U.S. federal taxable income may
be subject to limitations, which could potentially result in
increased future tax liability to us. In addition, at the state
level, there may be periods during which the use of NOLs is
suspended or otherwise limited, which could accelerate or
permanently increase state taxes owed.
Stockholders may experience significant dilution if future equity
offerings are used to fund operations or acquire complementary
businesses.
If
future operations or acquisitions are financed through the issuance
of additional equity securities, stockholders could experience
significant dilution. Securities issued in connection with future
financing activities or potential acquisitions may have rights and
preferences senior to the rights and preferences of our common
stock. In addition, the issuance of shares of our common stock upon
the exercise of outstanding options or warrants may result in
dilution to our stockholders.
We may become involved in securities class action litigation that
could divert management’s attention and harm our
business.
The
stock market in general, and the stocks of early stage companies in
particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations.
These fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to
the operating performance of the companies involved. If these
fluctuations occur in the future, the market price of our shares
could fall regardless of our operating performance. In the past,
following periods of volatility in the market price of a particular
company’s securities, securities class action litigation has
often been brought against that company. If the market price or
volume of our shares suffers extreme fluctuations, then we may
become involved in this type of litigation, which would be
expensive and divert management’s attention and resources
from managing our business.
As a
public company, we may also from time to time make forward-looking
statements about future operating results and provide some
financial guidance to the public markets. Projections may not be
made in a timely manner or we might fail to reach expected
performance levels and could materially affect the price of our
shares. Any failure to meet published forward-looking statements
that adversely affect the stock price could result in losses to
investors, stockholder lawsuits or other litigation, sanctions or
restrictions issued by the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
We have a significant number of outstanding options. Future sales
of these shares could adversely affect the market price of our
common stock.
As of
December 31, 2019, we had outstanding options for an aggregate
of approximately 10.6 million shares of common stock at a
weighted average exercise price of $3.89 per share. The holders may
sell many of these shares in the public markets from time to time,
without limitations on the timing, amount or method of sale. As and
when our stock price rises, if at all, more outstanding options
will be in-the-money and the holders may exercise their options and
sell a large number of shares. This could cause the market price of
our common stock to decline.
Our amended and restated bylaws, as amended (our
“Bylaws”) provide that the Court of Chancery of the
State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for certain disputes
between us and our stockholders, which could limit our
stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum
for disputes with us or our directors, officers or
employees.
Our Bylaws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of
Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any
derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf,
(ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary
duty owed by any of our directors or officers to our company or our
stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against our
company arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General
Corporation Law or our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation or Bylaws, or (iv) any action asserting a claim
against our company governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This
choice of forum provision does not apply to suits brought to
enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Exchange Act, or any other claim for which the
federal courts have exclusive
jurisdiction.
This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s
ability to bring certain claims in a judicial forum that it finds
favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers,
other employees or stockholders, which may discourage lawsuits with
respect to such claims, although our stockholders will not be
deemed to have waived our compliance with federal securities laws
and the rules and regulations thereunder. If a court were to find
this choice of forum provision to be inapplicable or unenforceable
in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with
resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely
affect our business and financial condition.
Item
1B.
Unresolved Staff
Comments
None.
Item
2.
Properties
As of
December 31, 2019, we lease (i) approximately 10,000 square feet of
office space in Los Angeles, California with two years remaining on
the lease, (ii) approximately 15,000 square feet of office space in
Irvine, California with five months remaining on the lease, and
(iii) approximately 10,000 square feet of space for research and
development laboratory in Longmont, Colorado with four years
remaining on the lease. The below table illustrates the use of each
property by our business segments.
Business
Segment
|
Property
Used
|
Consumer
Products
|
All
properties
|
Ingredients
|
All
properties
|
Analytical
Reference Standards and Services
|
Irvine,
CA and Longmont, CO
|
We do
not own any real estate. For the year ended December 31, 2019, our
total annual rental expense was approximately $979,000.
Item
3.
Legal
Proceedings
(A) California Action
On December 29, 2016, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a complaint in the
United States District Court for the Central District of
California, naming Elysium Health, Inc. (together with Elysium
Health, LLC, “Elysium”) as defendant (the
“Complaint”). On January 25, 2017, Elysium filed an
answer and counterclaims in response to the Complaint (together
with the Complaint, the “California Action”). Over the
course of the California Action, the parties have each filed
amended pleadings several times and have each engaged in several
rounds of motions to dismiss and one round of motion for judgment
on the pleadings with respect to various claims. Most recently, on
November 27, 2018, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a fifth amended complaint
that added an individual, Mark Morris, as a defendant. Elysium and
Morris (“the Defendants”) moved to dismiss on December
21, 2018. The court denied Defendants’ motion on February 4,
2019. Defendants filed their answer to ChromaDex, Inc.'s fifth
amended complaint on February 19, 2019. ChromaDex, Inc. filed an
answer to Elysium’s restated counterclaims on March 5, 2019.
Discovery closed on August 9, 2019.
On August 16, 2019, the parties filed motions for partial summary
judgment as to certain claims and counterclaims. The parties filed
opposition briefs on August 28, 2019, and reply briefs on September
4, 2019. On October 9, 2019, among other things, the court vacated
the previously scheduled trial date, ordered supplemental briefing
with respect to certain issues related to summary judgment. Elysium
filed its opening supplemental brief on October 30, 2019, ChromaDex
filed its opening supplemental brief on November 18, 2019, and
Elysium filed a reply brief on November 27, 2019, and the court
heard argument on January 13, 2020. On January 16, 2020, the court
granted both parties’ motions for summary judgment in part
and denied both in part. On ChromaDex’s motion, the court
granted summary judgment in favor of ChromaDex on Elysium’s
counterclaims for (i) breach of contract related to manufacturing
NIAGEN® according to the defined standard, selling NIAGEN and
ingredients that are substantially similar to pterostilbene to
other customers, distributing the NIAGEN® product
specifications, and failing to provide information concerning the
quality and identity of NIAGEN®, and (ii) breach of the
implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The court denied
summary judgment on Elysium’s counterclaims for (i)
fraudulent inducement of the Trademark License and Royalty
Agreement, dated February 3, 2014, by and between ChromaDex, Inc.
and Elysium (the “License Agreement”), (ii) patent
misuse, and (iii) unjust enrichment. On Elysium’s motion, the
court granted summary judgment in favor of Elysium on
ChromaDex’s claim for damages related to $110,000 in avoided
costs arising from documents that Elysium used in violation of the
Supply Agreement, dated February 3, 2014, by and between ChromaDex,
Inc. and Elysium, as amended (the “NIAGEN® Supply
Agreement”). The court denied summary judgment on
Elysium’s counterclaim for breach of contract related to
certain refunds or credits to Elysium. The court also denied
summary judgment on ChromaDex’s breach of contract claim
against Morris and claims for disgorgement of $8.3 million in
Elysium’s resale profits, $600,000 for a price discount
received by Elysium, and $684,781 in Morris’s
compensation.
Following the court’s January 16, 2020 order, the claims that
ChromaDex, Inc. presently asserts in the California Action, among
other allegations, are that (i) Elysium breached the Supply
Agreement, dated June 26, 2014, by and between ChromaDex, Inc. and
Elysium (the “pTeroPure® Supply Agreement”), by
failing to make payments to ChromaDex, Inc. for purchases of
pTeroPure® and by improper disclosure of confidential
ChromaDex, Inc. information pursuant to the pTeroPure® Supply
Agreement, (ii) Elysium breached the NIAGEN® Supply Agreement,
by failing to make payments to ChromaDex, Inc. for purchases of
NIAGEN®, (iii) Defendants willfully and maliciously
misappropriated ChromaDex, Inc. trade secrets concerning its
ingredient sales business under both the California Uniform Trade
Secrets Act and the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, (iv) Morris
breached two confidentiality agreements he signed by improperly
stealing confidential ChromaDex, Inc. documents and information,
(v) Morris breached his fiduciary duty to ChromaDex, Inc. by lying
to and competing with ChromaDex, Inc. while still employed there,
and (vi) Elysium aided and abetted Morris’s breach of
fiduciary duty. ChromaDex, Inc. is seeking damages and interest for
Elysium’s alleged breaches of the NIAGEN® Supply
Agreement and pTeroPure® Supply Agreement and Morris’s
alleged breaches of his confidentiality agreements, compensatory
damages and interest, punitive damages, injunctive relief, and
attorney’s fees for Defendants’ alleged willful and
malicious misappropriation of ChromaDex, Inc.’s trade
secrets, and compensatory damages and interest, disgorgement of all
benefits received, and punitive damages for Morris’s alleged
breach of his fiduciary duty and Elysium’s aiding and
abetting of that alleged breach.
The claims that Elysium presently alleges in the California Action
are that (i) ChromaDex, Inc. breached the NIAGEN® Supply
Agreement by not issuing certain refunds or credits to Elysium,
(ii) ChromaDex, Inc. fraudulently induced Elysium into entering
into the License Agreement, (iv) ChromaDex, Inc.’s conduct
constitutes misuse of its patent rights, and (v) ChromaDex, Inc.
was unjustly enriched by the royalties Elysium paid pursuant to the
License Agreement. Elysium is seeking damages for ChromaDex,
Inc.’s alleged breaches of the NIAGEN® Supply Agreement,
and compensatory damages, punitive damages, and/or rescission of
the License Agreement and restitution of any royalty payments
conveyed by Elysium pursuant to the License Agreement, and a
declaratory judgment that ChromaDex, Inc. has engaged in patent
misuse.
On January 17, 2020, Elysium moved to substitute its counsel. The
same day, the court ordered hearing on that motion for January 21,
2020, and granted Elysium’s motion at the hearing. On January
23, 2020, the court issued a scheduling order that, among other
things, set trial on the remaining claims to begin on May 12,
2020.
(B) Patent Office Proceedings
On July 17, 2017, Elysium filed petitions with the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office for inter
partes review of U.S.
Patents 8,197,807 (the “’807 Patent”) and
8,383,086 (the “’086 Patent”), patents to which
ChromaDex, Inc. is the exclusive licensee. The Patent Trial and
Appeal Board (“PTAB”) denied institution of
the inter
partes review for the
’807 Patent on January 18, 2018. On January 29, 2018, the
PTAB granted institution of the inter
partes review as to claims
1 and 3-5 and denied institution as to claim 2 of the ’086
Patent. Based upon a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, and solely
on a procedural basis, the PTAB was required to include claim 2 in
the trial of the inter
partes review. The matter
was heard on October 2, 2018. The PTAB issued its written decision
on January 16, 2019, upholding claim 2 of the ’086 Patent
which relates to the use of isolated NR in a pharmaceutical
composition as valid. Elysium is now prevented from raising
invalidity arguments against the ’086 Patent in the ongoing
patent litigation in Delaware that it brought or could have brought
before the PTAB in its inter
partes review. Elysium
appealed the PTAB’s decision with respect to claim 2 on March
6, 2019. A cross-appeal with respect to claims 1 and 3–5 was
filed on March 20, 2019. Elysium filed its opening brief on June
17, 2019. Dartmouth moved to voluntarily dismiss its cross-appeal
on August 14, 2019. The motion was granted on August 18, 2019.
Dartmouth’s response brief was filed on August 28, 2019.
Elysium’s reply brief was filed on October 9,
2019. Oral
argument on Elysium’s appeal was heard on March 5, 2020. On
March 6, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s decision, rejecting Elysium's
attempt to invalidate claim 2 of the '086 patent.
(C) Southern District of New York Action
On September 27, 2017, Elysium Health Inc. ("Elysium Health") filed
a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York, against ChromaDex, Inc. (the “Elysium
SDNY Complaint”). Elysium Health alleges in the Elysium SDNY
Complaint that ChromaDex, Inc. made false and misleading statements
in a citizen petition to the Food and Drug Administration it filed
on or about August 18, 2017. Among other allegations, Elysium
Health avers that the citizen petition made Elysium Health’s
product appear dangerous, while casting ChromaDex, Inc.’s own
product as safe. The Elysium SDNY Complaint asserts four claims for
relief: (i) false advertising under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.
§ 1125(a); (ii) trade libel; (iii) deceptive business
practices under New York General Business Law § 349; and (iv)
tortious interference with prospective economic relations.
ChromaDex, Inc. denies the claims in the Elysium SDNY Complaint and
intends to defend against them vigorously. On October 26, 2017,
ChromaDex, Inc. moved to dismiss the Elysium SDNY Complaint on the
grounds that, inter alia, its statements in the citizen petition
are immune from liability under the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine, the
litigation privilege, and New York’s Anti-SLAPP statute, and
that the Elysium SDNY Complaint failed to state a claim. Elysium
Health opposed the motion on November 2, 2017. ChromaDex, Inc.
filed its reply on November 9, 2017.
On October 26, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a complaint in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
against Elysium Health (the “ChromaDex SDNY
Complaint”). ChromaDex, Inc. alleges that Elysium Health made
material false and misleading statements to consumers in the
promotion, marketing, and sale of its health supplement product,
Basis, and asserts five claims for relief: (i) false advertising
under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1125(a); (ii) unfair
competition under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); (iii) deceptive
practices under New York General Business Law § 349; (iv)
deceptive practices under New York General Business Law § 350;
and (v) tortious interference with prospective economic advantage.
On November 16, 2017, Elysium Health moved to dismiss for failure
to state a claim. ChromaDex, Inc. opposed the motion on November
30, 2017 and Elysium Health filed a reply on December 7,
2017.
On November 3, 2017, the Court consolidated the Elysium SDNY
Complaint and the ChromaDex SDNY Complaint actions under the
caption In re Elysium Health-ChromaDex Litigation, 17-cv-7394, and
stayed discovery in the consolidated action pending a Court-ordered
mediation. The mediation was unsuccessful. On September 27, 2018,
the Court issued a combined ruling on both parties’ motions
to dismiss. For ChromaDex’s motion to dismiss, the Court
converted the part of the motion on the issue of whether the
citizen petition is immune under the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine into
a motion for summary judgment, and requested supplemental evidence
from both parties, which were submitted on October 29, 2018. The
Court otherwise denied the motion to dismiss. On January 3, 2019,
the Court granted ChromaDex, Inc.’s motion for summary
judgment under the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine and dismissed all
claims in the Elysium SDNY Complaint. Elysium moved for
reconsideration on January 17, 2019. The Court denied
Elysium’s motion for reconsideration on February 6, 2019, and
issued an amended final order granting ChromaDex, Inc.’s
motion for summary judgment as on February 7, 2019.
The Court granted in part and denied in part Elysium’s motion
to dismiss, sustaining three grounds for ChromaDex’s Lanham
Act claims while dismissing two others, sustaining the claim under
New York General Business Law § 349, and dismissing the claims
under New York General Business Law § 350 and for tortious
interference. Elysium filed an answer and counterclaims on October
10, 2018, alleging claims for (i) false advertising under the
Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1125(a); (ii) unfair competition under
15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); and (iii) deceptive practices under New
York General Business Law § 349. ChromaDex answered
Elysium’s counterclaims on November 2, 2018.
ChromaDex, Inc. filed an amended complaint on March 27, 2019,
adding new claims against Elysium Health for false advertising and
unfair competition under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
On April 10, 2019, Elysium Health answered the amended complaint
and filed amended counterclaims, also adding new claims against
ChromaDex, Inc. for false advertising and unfair competition under
the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). On July 1, 2019, Elysium
Health filed further amended counterclaims, adding new claims under
the Copyright Act §§ 106 & 501. On February 9, 2020,
ChromaDex, Inc. filed a motion for leave to amend its complaint to
add additional claims against Elysium Health for false advertising
and unfair competition. On February 10, 2020, Elysium Health filed
a motion for leave to amend its counterclaims to identify allegedly
false and misleading statements in ChromaDex’s advertising.
Those motions remain pending and the parties are currently in
discovery.
The Company is unable to predict the outcome of these matters and,
at this time, cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range
of loss with respect to the legal proceedings discussed herein. As
of December 31, 2019, ChromaDex, Inc. did not accrue a potential
loss for the California Action or the Elysium SDNY Complaint
because ChromaDex, Inc. believes that the allegations are without
merit and thus it is not probable that a liability has been
incurred.
(D) Delaware – Patent Infringement Action
On September 17, 2018, ChromaDex, Inc. and Trustees of Dartmouth
College filed a patent infringement complaint in the United States
District Court for the District of Delaware against Elysium Health,
Inc. The complaint alleges that Elysium’s BASIS® dietary
supplement violates U.S. Patents 8,197,807 (the “’807
Patent”) and 8,383,086 (the “’086 Patent”)
that comprise compositions containing isolated nicotinamide
riboside held by Dartmouth and licensed exclusively to ChromaDex,
Inc. On October 23, 2018, Elysium filed an answer to the complaint.
The answer asserts various affirmative defenses and denies that
Plaintiffs are entitled to any relief.
On November 7, 2018, Elysium filed a motion to stay the patent
infringement proceedings pending resolution of (1)
the inter
partes review of the
’807 Patent and the ’086 Patent before the Patent Trial
and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) and (2) the outcome of the
litigation in the California Action. ChromaDex, Inc. filed an
opposition brief on November 21, 2018 detailing the issues with
Elysium’s motion to stay. In particular, ChromaDex, Inc.
argued that given claim 2 of the ’086 Patent was only
included in the PTAB’s inter
partes review for
procedural reasons the PTAB was unlikely to invalidate claim 2 and
therefore litigation in Delaware would continue regardless. In
addition, ChromaDex, Inc. argued that the litigation in the
California Action is unlikely to have a significant effect on the
ongoing patent litigation. After the PTAB released its written
decision upholding claim 2 of the ’086 Patent, proving right
ChromaDex, Inc.’s prediction, ChromaDex, Inc. informed the
Delaware court of the PTAB’s decision on January 17, 2019. On
June 19, 2019, the Delaware court granted in part and denied in
part Elysium’s motion, ordering that the case was stayed
pending the resolution of Elysium’s patent misuse
counterclaim in the California Action.
On November 1, 2019, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a motion to lift the
stay due to changed circumstances in the California Action, among
other reasons. Briefing on the motion was completed on November 22,
2019. On January 6, 2020, the Delaware court issued an oral order
instructing the parties to submit a joint status report after the
January 13, 2020 motions hearing in the California Action. The
joint status report was submitted on January 30, 2020. On February
4, 2020, the Delaware court issued an order granting ChromaDex,
Inc.’s motion to lift the stay and setting a scheduling
conference for March 10, 2020.
Legal proceedings – Utah Lanham Act Action
On March 6, 2019, Novex Biotech LLC (“Novex”) filed an
action in the Third Judicial District Court County of Salt Lake,
State of Utah against ChromaDex, Inc. and 10 fictional defendants.
The complaint alleges that Novex markets a dietary supplement,
Oxydrene Elite, that competes with ChromaDex’s product, TRU
NIAGEN. The complaint further alleges that ChromaDex, Inc. has
violated the Lanham Act by making false or misleading claims for
TRU NIAGEN. Novex is seeking an injunction and damages for the
competitive harm it alleges to have suffered.
ChromaDex, Inc. timely removed the action to federal court in the
District of Utah. ChromaDex answered the complaint and also filed
counterclaims against Novex under the Lanham Act and California
state law. ChromaDex’s counterclaims allege that Novex has
falsely advertised its product called Oxydrene. Novex moved to
dismiss the counterclaims and ChromaDex has opposed this motion.
Discovery in the case is ongoing and no hearing has been set for
Novex’s motion to dismiss.
The Company is unable to predict the outcome of this matter and, at
this time, cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of
loss with respect to the legal proceedings discussed herein. As of
December 31, 2019, ChromaDex, Inc. did not accrue a potential loss
for the Utah Lanham Act action because ChromaDex, Inc. believes
that the allegations are without merit and thus it is not probable
that a liability has been incurred.
From time to time we are involved in legal proceedings arising in
the ordinary course of our business. We believe that there is no
other litigation pending that is likely to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our financial condition
or results of operations.
Item
4.
Mine Safety
Disclosures
Not
applicable.
PART II
Item
5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Since
April 25, 2016, our common stock has been traded on The Nasdaq
Capital Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol
“CDXC.” On March 3, 2020, the closing sale price was
$3.60.
Holders of Our Common Stock
As of
March 3, 2020, we had approximately 51 registered holders of record
of our common stock.
Dividend Policy
We have
not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock during
either of the two most recent fiscal years and have no current
intention to pay any cash dividends. Our ability to pay cash
dividends is governed by applicable provisions of Delaware law and
is subject to the discretion of our Board of
Directors.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Other than as previously disclosed in our past Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, the Company did not have
any sales of unregistered securities for the period covered by this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item
6.
Selected Financial Data
Not
Applicable.
Item
7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operation together with “Selected
Financial Data,” the consolidated financial statements and
the related notes included elsewhere this Form 10-K. This
discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks
and uncertainties. When reviewing the discussion below, you should
keep in mind the substantial risks and uncertainties that impact
our business. In particular, we encourage you to review the risks
and uncertainties described in “Risk Factors” in Part
I, Item 1A in this Form 10-K. These risks and uncertainties could
cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in
forward-looking statements contained in this report or implied by
past results and trends.
Overview
ChromaDex
Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries, ChromaDex, Inc.,
Healthspan Research, LLC, ChromaDex Analytics, Inc. and ChromaDex
Asia Limited (collectively, the “Company”
“ChromaDex” or, in the first person as “we”
“us” and “our”) are a science-based
integrated nutraceutical company devoted to improving the way
people age. ChromaDex scientists partner with leading universities
and research institutions worldwide to discover, develop and create
solutions to deliver the full potential of nicotinamide adenine
dinucleotide ("NAD") and its impact on human health. Our flagship
ingredient, NIAGEN® nicotinamide riboside, a precursor to NAD
sold directly to consumers as TRU NIAGEN®, is backed with
clinical and scientific research, as well as intellectual property
protection. The Company also has analytical reference standards and
services segment, which focuses on natural product fine chemicals
(known as “phytochemicals”) and related chemistry
services.
The
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations are based on the ChromaDex financial statements, which
have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. The preparation of these financial
statements requires making estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, as well as the reported revenues, if any, and expenses
during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate such
estimates and judgments, including those described in greater
detail below. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
As of
December 31, 2019, cash and cash equivalents totaled approximately
$18.8 million. The Company anticipates that its current cash, cash
equivalents and cash to be generated from operations will be
sufficient to meet its projected operating plans through at least
the next twelve months from the issuance date of this report. The
Company may, however, seek additional capital in the next twelve
months, both to meet its projected operating plans after the next
twelve months and/or to fund its longer term strategic
objectives.
Additional
capital may come from public and/or private stock or debt
offerings, borrowings under lines of credit or other sources. These
additional funds may not be available on favorable terms, or at
all. Further, if we issue equity or debt securities to
raise additional funds, our existing stockholders may experience
dilution and the new equity or debt securities we issue may have
rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our existing
stockholders. In addition, if we raise additional funds through
collaboration, licensing or other similar arrangements, it may be
necessary to relinquish valuable rights to our products or
proprietary technologies, or to grant licenses on terms that are
not favorable to us. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms,
we may not be able to develop or enhance our products, obtain the
required regulatory clearances or approvals, achieve long term
strategic objectives, take advantage of future opportunities, or
respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated customer
requirements. Any of these events could adversely affect our
ability to achieve our development and commercialization goals,
which could have a material and adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Some of
our operations are subject to regulation by various state and
federal agencies. Dietary supplements are subject to FDA, FTC and
U.S. Department of Agriculture regulations relating to composition,
labeling and advertising claims. These regulations may in some
cases, particularly with respect to those applicable to new
ingredients, require a notification that must be submitted to the
FDA along with evidence of safety. There are similar regulations
related to food additives.
Results of Operations
Our
losses per basic and diluted share were $0.56 and $0.61 for the
twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018,
respectively. Over the next two years, we plan to continue to
increase marketing, research and development efforts for our
flagship ingredient, NIAGEN® nicotinamide riboside, and our
consumer branded product TRU NIAGEN®.
(In
thousands)
|
Twelve months
ending
|
|
|
Dec.
31, 2019
|
Dec.
31, 2018
|
Sales
|
$46,291
|
$31,557
|
Cost of
sales
|
20,522
|
15,502
|
Gross
profit
|
25,769
|
16,055
|
Operating
expenses -Sales and marketing
|
18,216
|
16,537
|
-Research
and development
|
4,420
|
5,478
|
-General
and administrative
|
34,308
|
27,137
|
-Other
|
125
|
75
|
Nonoperating
-Interest expense, net
|
(847)
|
(79)
|
-Other
|
-
|
(65)
|
Net
loss
|
$(32,147)
|
$(33,316)
|
Net Sales. Net sales consist of gross sales less discounts
and returns.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
(In
thousands)
|
December 31, 2019
|
December
31, 2018
|
Change
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Products
|
$36,075
|
$18,451
|
96%
|
Ingredients
|
6,196
|
8,565
|
-28%
|
Analytical
reference standards and services
|
4,020
|
4,541
|
-11%
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
$46,291
|
$31,557
|
47%
|
●
The Company's TRU
NIAGEN® sales for consumer products segment increased after
the Company's strategic shift towards consumer products in 2017.
The Company expects the sales for the consumer products segment to
continue to grow over the next twelve months.
●
The decrease in
sales for the ingredients segment is largely due to the
Company’s focus on expanding consumer products business. The
Company made a strategic decision in 2017 to transition from an
ingredient company to a consumer driven nutraceutical company that
has resulted in a shift in our sales away from
ingredients.
●
The decrease in
sales for the analytical reference standards and services segment
is primarily due to decreased sales of analytical reference
standards.
Cost of Sales. Costs of sales include raw materials, labor,
overhead, and delivery costs.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
|||
(In
thousands)
|
December 31, 2019
|
December
31, 2018
|
||
|
Amount
|
%
of
net
sales
|
Amount
|
%
of
net
sales
|
Cost of sales:
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Products
|
$14,550
|
40%
|
$7,222
|
39%
|
Ingredients
|
2,980
|
48%
|
4,831
|
56%
|
Analytical
reference standards and services
|
2,992
|
74%
|
3,449
|
76%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
$20,522
|
44%
|
$15,502
|
49%
|
The
cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, decreased
5%.
●
The cost of sales,
as a percentage of net sales, for the consumer products segment
increased 1%. Compared to the other segments, the consumer products
segment experienced better margins due to the positive impact of
TRU NIAGEN® consumer product sales.
●
The cost of sales,
as a percentage of net sales, for the ingredients segment decreased
8%. The ingredient segment recorded higher margins compared to the
last year as we focus on fewer ingredients with higher profit
margins. Also, in 2018, we had an inventory write off of
approximately $442,000.
●
The cost of sales,
as a percentage of net sales for the analytical reference standards
and services segment decreased 2%. In 2019, we focused on sale of
reference standards and services with higher profit
margins.
Gross Profit. Gross profit is net sales less the cost of
sales and is affected by a number of factors including product mix,
competitive pricing and costs of products and
services.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
(In
thousands)
|
December 31, 2019
|
December
31, 2018
|
Change
|
Gross profit:
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Products
|
$21,525
|
$11,229
|
92%
|
Ingredients
|
3,216
|
3,734
|
-14%
|
Analytical
reference standards and services
|
1,028
|
1,092
|
-6%
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
$25,769
|
$16,055
|
61%
|
●
The consumer
products segment posted gross profit of $21.5 million in 2019. The
Company expects the sales and gross profit for consumer products
segment to continue to grow over the next twelve
months.
●
The decreased gross
profit for the ingredients segment was largely due to a decrease in
sales as the Company transitions from an ingredient company to a
consumer driven nutraceutical company.
●
The decreased gross
profit for the analytical reference standards and services segment
is largely due to the decreased sales.
Operating Expenses – Sales and Marketing. Sales and
Marketing Expenses consist of salaries, advertising and marketing
expenses.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
(In
thousands)
|
December 31, 2019
|
December
31, 2018
|
Change
|
Sales and marketing expenses:
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Products
|
$17,343
|
$15,063
|
15%
|
Ingredients
|
245
|
727
|
-66%
|
Analytical
reference standards and services
|
628
|
747
|
-16%
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales and marketing
expenses
|
$18,216
|
$16,537
|
10%
|
●
For the consumer
products segment, the Company has increased staffing as well as
direct marketing expenses associated with social media and other
customer awareness and acquisition programs. The Company plans to
continue to invest in building out our own global branded consumer
product business.
●
For the ingredients
segment, the decrease in 2019 is largely due to decreased marketing
efforts as the Company shifts towards consumer
products.
●
For the analytical
reference standards and services segment, the decrease is mainly
due to decreased sales and marketing efforts.
Operating Expenses – Research and Development.
Research and Development Expenses consist of clinical trials and
process development expenses.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
(In
thousands)
|
December 31, 2019
|
December
31, 2018
|
Change
|
Research and development expenses:
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Products
|
$3,699
|
$3,852
|
-4%
|
Ingredients
|
721
|
1,626
|
-56%
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and development
expenses
|
$4,420
|
$5,478
|
-19%
|
●
In 2017, we began
allocating the research and development expenses related to our
NIAGEN® branded ingredient to the consumer products and
ingredients segment, based on revenues recorded. Overall, we
decreased our research and development efforts as we evaluate and
realign the priorities of our ongoing research and development
efforts of our flagship ingredient, NIAGEN® nicotinamide
riboside.
Operating Expenses – General and Administrative.
General and Administrative Expenses consist of general company
administration, IT, accounting and executive management
expenses.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
(In
thousands)
|
December 31, 2019
|
December
31, 2018
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative
|
$34,308
|
$27,137
|
26%
|
The
following expenses contributed to the increase in general and
administrative expenses in 2019:
●
An increase in bad
debt expense. Our bad debt expense increased to approximately $2.2
million in 2019 compared to an insignificant amount in 2018. This
is due to recording a write off $2.2 million related to trade
receivable from Elysium Health by increasing the allowance from
$0.5 million to the entire trade receivable balance of $2.7
million. We placed a reserve for the entire outstanding balance as
it was no longer deemed collectible.
●
An increase in
legal expenses. Our legal expenses increased to approximately $11.3
million in 2019 compared to approximately $9.8 million in 2018. The
ongoing litigation with Elysium and our increased efforts to file
and maintain patents related to the proprietary ingredient
technologies were the main reasons for the increase in legal
expenses.
●
An increase in
royalties we pay to patent holders. Our royalty expense increased
to approximately $2.6 million in 2019, compared to approximately
$1.6 million in 2018. The increases are due to increased sales for
licensed products in 2019.
Nonoperating – Interest Expense, net. Interest
expense, net consists of interest earned from bank deposit accounts
less interest expenses from convertible notes, the line of credit
arrangement and finance leases.
|
Twelve
months ending
|
||
(In
thousands)
|
December 31, 2019
|
December
31, 2018
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
$847
|
$79
|
972%
|
●
In 2019, the
Company recorded debt discounts of approximately $0.8 million in
connection with the issuance of convertible promissory notes in the
aggregate principal amount of $10.0 million to Winsave Resources
Limited and Pioneer Step Holdings Limited. The debt discounts have
been amortized as interest expense using the effective interest
method.
Depreciation and Amortization. For the twelve-month period
ended December 31, 2019, we recorded approximately $0.8 million in
depreciation compared to approximately $0.6 million for the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2018. We depreciate our
assets on a straight-line basis, based on the estimated useful
lives of the respective assets. We amortize intangible assets using
a straight-line method, generally over 10 years. For licensed
patent rights, the useful lives are 10 years or the remaining term
of the patents underlying licensing rights, whichever is shorter.
The useful lives of subsequent milestone payments that are
capitalized are the remaining useful life of the initial licensing
payment that was capitalized. In the twelve-month period ended
December 31, 2019, we recorded amortization on intangible assets of
approximately $0.2 million compared to approximately $0.2 million
for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2018.
Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation
allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely
than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will
not be realized. At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the
Company maintained a full valuation allowance against the entire
deferred income tax balance which resulted in an effective tax rate
of 0% for each of 2019 and 2018. As defined in ASC 740,
Income Taxes, future
realization of the tax benefit will depend on the existence of
sufficient taxable income, including the expectation of continued
future taxable income.
Net cash used in operating activities. Net cash used in
operating activities for the twelve-month period ended December 31,
2019 was approximately $20.4 million as compared to approximately
$20.9 million for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2018.
Along with the net loss, an increase inventories was the largest
use of cash during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2019.
Net cash used in operating activities for the twelve-month period
ended December 31, 2018 also largely reflects an increase in
inventories along with the net loss.
We
expect our operating cash flows to fluctuate significantly in
future periods as a result of fluctuations in our operating
results, shipment timetables, accounts receivable collections,
inventory management, and the timing of our payments, among other
factors.
Net cash used in investing activities. Net cash used in
investing activities was approximately $0.2 million for the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2019, compared to
approximately $1.8 million for the twelve-month period ended
December 31, 2018. Net cash used in investing activities for the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2018, mainly consisted of
purchases of leasehold improvements and equipment, offset by
proceeds from disposal of assets held at escrow. Net cash used in
investing activities for the twelve-month period ended December 31,
2018, mainly consisted of purchases of leasehold improvements and
equipment and intangible assets, as well as a long-term related
party investment.
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities. Net
cash provided by financing activities was approximately $16.9
million for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2019,
compared to approximately $90,000 used for the twelve-month period
ended December 31, 2018. Net cash provided by financing activities
for 2019 mainly consisted of proceeds from issuances of our common
stock, sale of convertible notes and exercise of stock options,
offset by principal payments on finance leases. Net cash used in
financing activities for 2018 primarily consisted of repurchase of
common stock and principal payments on finance leases, partially
offset by proceeds from exercise of stock options.
Trade Receivables. As of December 31, 2019, we had
approximately $2.2 million in trade receivables as compared to
approximately $4.4 million as of December 31, 2018.
Inventories. As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately
$11.5 million in inventory, compared to approximately $8.2 million
as of December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2019, our inventory
consisted of approximately $9.5 million of consumer products,
approximately $1.4 million of bulk ingredients and approximately
$0.6 million of phytochemical reference standards. Consumer
products inventory consists of TRU NIAGEN® branded finished
bottles of dietary supplement products and related work-in-process
inventory. Bulk ingredients are proprietary compounds sold to
customers in larger quantities, typically in kilograms. These
ingredients are used by our customers in the dietary supplement,
food and beverage, animal health, cosmetic and pharmaceutical
industries to manufacture their final products. Phytochemical
reference standards are small quantities of plan-based compounds
typically used to research an array of potential attributes or for
quality control purposes. The Company currently lists over
1,500 phytochemicals and 300 botanical reference materials in our
catalog and holds a lot of these as inventory in small quantities,
mostly in grams and milligrams.
Our
normal operating cycle for reference standards is currently longer
than one year. Due to the large number of different items we carry,
certain groups of these reference standards have a sales frequency
that is slower than others and varies greatly year to year. In
addition, for certain reference standards, the cost saving is
advantageous when purchased in larger quantities and we have taken
advantage of such opportunities when available. Such factors have
resulted in an operating cycle to be more than one year on average.
The Company gains competitive advantage through the broad offering
of reference standards and it is critical for the Company to
continue to expand its library of reference standards it offers for
the growth of business. Nevertheless, the Company has made changes
in its reference standards inventory purchasing practice, which the
management believes will result in an improved turnover rate and
shorter operating cycle without impacting our competitive
advantage.
The
Company regularly reviews inventories on hand and reduces the
carrying value for slow-moving and obsolete inventory, inventory
not meeting quality standards and inventory subject to expiration.
The reduction of the carrying value for slow-moving and obsolete
inventory is based on current estimates of future product demand,
market conditions and related management judgment. Any significant
unanticipated changes in future product demand or market conditions
that vary from current expectations could have an impact on the
value of inventories.
We
strive to optimize our supply chain as we constantly search for
better and more reliable sources and suppliers. By doing so, we
believe we can lower the costs of our inventory and yield higher
gross profit. In addition, we are working with our suppliers and
partners to develop more efficient manufacturing methods, in an
effort to lower the costs of our inventory.
Accounts Payable. As of December 31, 2019, we had $9.6
million in accounts payable compared to approximately $9.5 million
as of December 31, 2018.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
For the
twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2019, and December 31,
2018, the Company has incurred losses from operations of
approximately $31.3 million and $33.2 million, respectively. Net
cash used in operating activities for the twelve-month periods
ended December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, was approximately
$20.4 million and $20.9 million, respectively. The losses and the
uses of cash are primarily due to expenses associated with the
development and expansion of our operations. These operations have
been financed through capital contributions, primarily through the
issuance of common stock in private placements.
Our
Board of Directors periodically reviews our capital requirements in
light of our proposed business plan. Our future capital
requirements will remain dependent upon a variety of factors,
including cash flow from operations, the ability to increase sales,
increasing our gross profits from current levels, reducing sales
and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales, continued
development of customer relationships, and our ability to market
our new products successfully. However, based on our results from
operations, we may determine that we need additional financing to
implement our business plan. Additional financing may come from
public and private equity or debt offerings, borrowings under lines
of credit or other sources. These additional funds may not be
available on favorable terms, or at all. There can be no assurance
we will be successful in raising these additional funds. Without
adequate financing we may have to further delay or terminate
product or service expansion plans. Any inability to raise
additional financing would have a material adverse effect on
us.
As of
December 31, 2019, the cash and cash equivalents totaled
approximately $18.8 million. The Company anticipates that its
current cash, cash equivalents and cash to be generated from
operations will be sufficient to meet its projected operating plans
through at least the next twelve months from the issuance date of
this report. The Company may, however, seek additional capital
within the next twelve months, both to meet its projected operating
plans after the next twelve months and/or to fund its longer term
strategic objectives.
Dividend Policy
We have
not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We
presently intend to retain earnings for use in our operations and
to finance our business. Any change in our dividend policy is
within the discretion of our board of directors and will depend,
among other things, on our earnings, debt service and capital
requirements, restrictions in financing agreements, if any,
business conditions, legal restrictions and other factors that our
board of directors deems relevant.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
During
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we
had no material off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The
following table summarizes our contractual obligations and other
commitments as of December 31, 2019:
|
Payments due by period
|
|||||
(In
thousands)
|
Total
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
leases
|
$1,610
|
$690
|
$614
|
$138
|
$143
|
$25
|
Finance
leases
|
290
|
272
|
18
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Purchase
obligations
|
11,520
|
11,520
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$13,420
|
$12,482
|
$632
|
$138
|
$143
|
$25
|
Operating leases. We lease our offices and research
facilities in California and Colorado under operating lease
agreements that expire at October 2021 and February 2024,
respectively. We make monthly payments on these
leases.
Finance leases. We lease equipment and computer software
under finance lease obligations with a term of typically two to
four years. We make monthly installment payments for these
leases.
Purchase obligations. We enter into purchase obligations
with various vendors for goods and services that we need for our
operations. The purchase obligations for goods and services include
inventory, advertising, research and development, and laboratory
supplies.
Critical Accounting Policies
The
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations are based on our financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires
us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosures. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate these estimates,
including those related to the valuation of share-based payments.
We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
Our
significant accounting policies are described in Note 3 of the
Financial Statements, set forth in Item 8 of this Form
10-K.
Item
7A.
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Not
applicable
Item
8.
Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data
The
financial statements are set forth in the pages listed
below.
|
Page
|
F-1
|
|
F-3
|
|
F-4
|
|
F-5
|
|
F-6
|
|
F-7
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
ChromaDex Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
ChromaDex Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”)
as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each
of the two years in the period ended December 31 2019, and the
related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial
statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the Company as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the
Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2019, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) in 2013 and our report dated March 10,
2020, expressed an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
Change in Accounting Principle
As
discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the
Company has changed its method of accounting for leases in 2019 due
to the adoption of the guidance in ASC Topic 842, Leases
(“Topic 842”).
Basis for Opinion
These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public
accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S.
federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those
risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
/s/ Marcum LLP
Marcum
llp
We have
served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.
New
York, NY
March
10, 2020
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
To the
Shareholders and Board of Directors of
ChromaDex
Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have
audited ChromaDex Corporation's (the “Company”)
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,
based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission.
We have
also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity,
and cash flows and the related notes for each of the two years in
the period ended December 31, 2019 of the Company, and our report
dated March 10, 2020 expressed an
unqualified opinion on
those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The
Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying “Management Annual Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting”. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a
public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required
to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with
the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness
exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our
audit also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of the inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/
Marcum LLP
Marcum
llp
New
York, NY
March
10, 2020
ChromaDex Corporation and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
Dec.
31, 2018
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
Cash,
including restricted cash of $0.2 million and $0.2 million,
respectively
|
$18,812
|
$22,616
|
Trade
receivables, net of allowances of $2.8 million and $0.5 million,
respectively;
|
|
|
Receivables
from Related Party: $0.8 million and $0.7 million,
respectively
|
2,175
|
4,359
|
Contract
assets
|
-
|
56
|
Receivable
held at escrow, net of allowance of $0.1 million
|
-
|
677
|
Inventories
|
11,535
|
8,249
|
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
996
|
577
|
Total current assets
|
33,518
|
36,534
|
|
|
|
Leasehold
Improvements and Equipment, net
|
3,765
|
3,585
|
Intangible
Assets, net
|
1,311
|
1,547
|
Right
of Use Assets
|
891
|
-
|
Other
Long-term Assets
|
762
|
566
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$40,247
|
$42,232
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$9,626
|
$9,548
|
Accrued
expenses
|
4,415
|
4,444
|
Current
maturities of operating lease obligations
|
595
|
-
|
Current
maturities of finance lease obligations
|
258
|
173
|
Contract
liabilities and customer deposits
|
169
|
275
|
Total current liabilities
|
15,063
|
14,440
|
|
|
|
Deferred
Revenue
|
3,873
|
-
|
Operating
Lease Obligations, Less Current Maturities
|
848
|
-
|
Finance
Lease Obligations, Less Current Maturities
|
18
|
137
|
Deferred
Rent
|
-
|
477
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
19,802
|
15,054
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
Equity
|
|
|
Common
stock, $.001 par value; authorized 150,000 shares;
|
|
|
issued
and outstanding December 31, 2019 59,562 shares and
|
|
|
December
31, 2018 55,089 shares
|
60
|
55
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
142,285
|
116,876
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(121,900)
|
(89,753)
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
20,445
|
27,178
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$40,247
|
$42,232
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ChromaDex Corporation and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
Sales,
net
|
$46,291
|
$31,557
|
Cost
of sales
|
20,522
|
15,502
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
25,769
|
16,055
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
Sales
and marketing
|
18,216
|
16,537
|
Research
and development
|
4,420
|
5,478
|
General
and administrative
|
34,308
|
27,137
|
Other
|
125
|
75
|
Operating expenses
|
57,069
|
49,227
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
(31,300)
|
(33,172)
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating
expense:
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net
|
(847)
|
(79)
|
Other
|
-
|
(65)
|
Nonoperating expenses
|
(847)
|
(144)
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
(32,147)
|
(33,316)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share:
|
$(0.56)
|
$(0.61)
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
57,056
|
55,006
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ChromaDex Corporation and
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
|
Accumulated
|
Stockholders'
|
|
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Paid-in
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 30, 2017
|
54,697
|
$55
|
$110,380
|
$(56,601)
|
$53,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
to retained earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
cumulative
effect of initially applying ASC 606
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
164
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
of stock options
|
132
|
-
|
529
|
-
|
529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase
of common stock
|
(75)
|
-
|
(404)
|
-
|
(404)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
restricted stock
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based
compensation
|
333
|
-
|
6,371
|
-
|
6,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(33,316)
|
(33,316)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2018
|
55,089
|
$55
|
$116,876
|
$(89,753)
|
$27,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock, net of offering costs of $0.2 million
|
1,568
|
2
|
6,770
|
-
|
6,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock for conversion of debt and accrued
interest
|
2,267
|
2
|
10,121
|
|
10,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
discount to covertible notes
|
-
|
-
|
282
|
-
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
of stock options
|
427
|
1
|
1,064
|
-
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
of of warrants
|
44
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based
compensation
|
167
|
-
|
7,172
|
-
|
7,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(32,147)
|
(32,147)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2019
|
59,562
|
$60
|
$142,285
|
$(121,900)
|
$20,445
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ChromaDex Corporation and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(32,147)
|
$(33,316)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
of leasehold improvements and equipment
|
762
|
607
|
Amortization
of intangibles
|
246
|
235
|
Amortization
of right of use assets
|
515
|
-
|
Share-based
compensation
|
7,172
|
6,371
|
Allowance
for doubtful trade receivables
|
2,228
|
(132)
|
Loss
from disposal of equipment
|
7
|
1
|
Amortization
of convertible notes issuance costs and discount
|
846
|
-
|
Non-cash
financing costs
|
134
|
70
|
Other
Non-cash expense
|
-
|
65
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
(44)
|
1,111
|
Contract
assets
|
56
|
-
|
Inventories
|
(3,286)
|
(2,453)
|
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
(247)
|
65
|
Accounts
payable
|
78
|
5,829
|
Accrued
expenses
|
103
|
668
|
Deferred
revenue
|
3,873
|
-
|
Customer
deposits and other
|
(106)
|
69
|
Payments
on operating leases
|
(629)
|
-
|
Deferred
rent
|
-
|
2
|
Due
to officer
|
-
|
(100)
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(20,439)
|
(20,908)
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities
|
|
|
Proceeds
from disposal of assets held at escrow
|
553
|
-
|
Purchases
of leasehold improvements and equipment
|
(743)
|
(1,321)
|
Purchases
of intangible assets
|
(10)
|
(131)
|
Investment
in other long-term assets
|
(49)
|
(323)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(249)
|
(1,775)
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock, net
|
6,772
|
-
|
Proceeds
from sale of convertible notes
|
10,000
|
-
|
Payment
of convertible notes issuance costs
|
(565)
|
-
|
Payment
of debt issuance costs
|
(113)
|
(19)
|
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
1,066
|
529
|
Repurchase
of common stock
|
-
|
(404)
|
Principal
payments on finance leases
|
(276)
|
(196)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
16,884
|
(90)
|
|
|
|
Net
decrease in cash
|
(3,804)
|
(22,773)
|
|
|
|
Cash
Beginning of Year, including restricted cash of $0.2 million for
2019
|
22,616
|
45,389
|
|
|
|
Cash
Ending of Year, including restricted cash of $0.2 million for both
2019 and 2018
|
$18,812
|
$22,616
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
Cash
payments for interest on finance leases
|
$33
|
$41
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Schedule of Noncash Operating Activity
|
|
|
Adjustment
to retained earnings - cumulative effect of initially applying ASC
606
|
$-
|
$164
|
Finance
lease obligation incurred on licensing fees
|
$99
|
$-
|
Right
of use assets transferred
|
$62
|
$-
|
Operating
lease obligation transferred
|
$65
|
$-
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Schedule of Noncash Investing Activity
|
|
|
Finance
lease obligation incurred for purchase of software
|
$143
|
$-
|
Operating
lease obligation incurred for tenant improvement credit
received
|
$64
|
$-
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Schedule of Noncash Financing Activity
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock for conversion of debt and accrued
interest
|
$10,123
|
$-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note
1.
Nature of Business
ChromaDex
Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries, ChromaDex, Inc.,
Healthspan Research, LLC, ChromaDex Analytics, Inc. and ChromaDex
Asia Limited (collectively, the “Company” or, in the
first person as “we” “us” and
“our”) are a science-based integrated nutraceutical
company devoted to improving the way people age. The Company's
scientists partner with leading universities and research
institutions worldwide to discover, develop and create solutions to
deliver the full potential of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and
its impact on human health. Its flagship ingredient, NIAGEN®
nicotinamide riboside, sold directly to consumers as TRU
NIAGEN®, is backed with clinical and scientific research, as
well as intellectual property protection. The Company also has
analytical reference standards and services segment, which focuses
on natural product fine chemicals (known as
“phytochemicals”) and related chemistry
services.
Note
2.
Liquidity
The
Company has incurred a net loss of approximately $32.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2019, and net loss of approximately
$33.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December
31, 2019, cash and cash equivalents totaled approximately $18.8
million, which includes restricted cash of approximately $0.2
million.
The
Company anticipates that its current cash, cash equivalents and
cash to be generated from operations will be sufficient to meet its
projected operating plans through at least the next twelve months
from the issuance date of this report. The Company may, however,
seek additional capital within the next twelve months, both to meet
its projected operating plans within the next twelve months and/or
to fund its longer term strategic objectives.
Note
3.
Significant Accounting Policies
Significant
accounting policies are as follows:
Basis of presentation: The financial statements and
accompanying notes have been prepared on a consolidated basis and
reflect the consolidated financial position of the Company and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated from these financial
statements. The Company's fiscal year ends on December
31.
Adopted Accounting Standards in Fiscal 2019:
Effective
the first day of fiscal year 2019, the Company adopted Accounting
Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic
842). ASU 2016-02 requires that a lessee recognize the assets and
liabilities that arise from operating leases. A lessee should
recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to
make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset
representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease
term. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 applying the modified
retrospective approach. For leases with a term of 12 months or
less, the Company made an accounting policy election by class of
underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease
liabilities. The Company’s leased assets and corresponding
liabilities exclude non-lease components.
Within
the opening balances for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2019,
the Company recognized right of use assets of approximately $1.5
million and corresponding operating lease obligations liabilities
of approximately $2.1 million which includes approximately $0.6
million deferred rent liability the Company previously recognized
as of December 31, 2018. The Company determines if an arrangement
is a lease at inception and classifies it as finance or operating.
Leased assets and corresponding liabilities are recognized based on
the present value of the lease payments over the lease term
utilizing an estimated borrowing rate for a secured loan with a
maturity corresponding to the remaining lease term. Leases
primarily consist of real property and laboratory
equipment.
Effective
the first day of fiscal year 2019, the Company adopted ASU No.
2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities
from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part
I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round
Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for
Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic
Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling
Interests with a Scope Exception. Among others, Part I of ASU
2017-11 allows companies to exclude a down round feature when
determining whether a financial instrument (or embedded conversion
feature) is considered indexed to the entity’s own stock. As
a result, financial instruments (or embedded conversion features)
with down round features may no longer be required to be accounted
for as derivative liabilities. A company recognizes the value of a
down round feature only when it is triggered and the strike price
has been adjusted downward.
Use of accounting estimates: The preparation of financial
statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Revenue recognition: The Company recognizes sales and the
related cost of sales when the performance obligations are
satisfied. The performance obligations are typically satisfied upon
shipment of physical goods or as the services are performed over
time. In addition to the satisfaction of the performance
obligations, the following conditions are required for revenue
recognition: an arrangement exists, there is a fixed price, and
collectability is reasonably assured. Discounts, returns and
allowances related to sales, including an estimated reserve for the
returns and allowances, are recorded as reduction of
revenue.
The
Company accounts for shipping and handling activities performed as
cost of sales under a fulfillment cost and any fee received for
shipping and handling as part of the transaction price and
recognize revenue when control of the good transfers. Shipping and
handling fees billed to customers included in net sales for the
years ending December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are as
follows:
(In
thousands)
|
2019
|
2018
|
Shipping and
handling fees billed
|
$360
|
$287
|
Taxes
collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities
are excluded from revenue, which is presented on a net basis in the
statement of operations.
Restricted cash: The Company classifies cash as restricted
if the withdrawal or its usage is restricted for more than three
months. In connection with a lease amendment entered on November 9,
2018 to lease additional office space located in Los Angeles,
California through October 2021, the Company delivered a letter of
credit issued by a bank to the landlord in the amount of $0.2
million. The issuing bank required a collateral for the letter of
credit and the Company made a deposit covering the letter of credit
amount with the issuing bank. The letter of credit expires on
October 18, 2020.
Trade accounts receivable, net: Trade accounts receivable
are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for
doubtful receivables based on monthly and quarterly reviews of all
outstanding amounts. Management determines the allowance for
doubtful accounts by identifying troubled accounts and by using
historical experience applied to an aging of accounts. The
allowance amounts for the periods ended December 31, 2019 and
December 31, 2018 are as follows:
(In
thousands)
|
2019
|
2018
|
Allowances Related
to
|
|
|
Elysium
Health
|
$2,733
|
$500
|
Other
Allowances
|
31
|
37
|
|
$2,764
|
$537
|
Trade
accounts receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible.
Recoveries of trade accounts receivable previously written off are
recorded when received.
Credit risk: Financial instruments that potentially subject
us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and
cash equivalents and trade receivables. For cash and cash
equivalents, the Company has them either in a form of bank deposits
or highly liquid debt instruments in investment-grade pursuant to
the Company's investment policy. Accounts at each institution are
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to
$250,000. As of December 31, 2019, we held a total deposit of
approximately $10.8 million with one institution and $7.7 million
with another institution which exceeded the FDIC limit. We,
however, believe we have very little credit risk exposure for our
cash and cash equivalents. Our trade receivables are derived from
sales to our customers. We assess credit risk of our customers
through quantitative and qualitative analysis. From this analysis,
we establish credit limits and manage the risk exposure. We,
however, incur credit losses due to bankruptcy or other failure of
the customer to pay.
Inventories: Inventories are comprised of work in process
and finished goods. They are stated at the lower of cost,
determined by the first-in, first-out method, or net realizable
value. The inventory on the balance sheet is recorded net of
valuation allowances. Labor and overhead has been added to
inventory that was manufactured or characterized by the
Company.
Our
normal operating cycle for reference standards is currently longer
than one year. The Company regularly reviews inventories on hand
and reduces the carrying value for slow-moving and obsolete
inventory, inventory not meeting quality standards and inventory
subject to expiration. The reduction of the carrying value for
slow-moving and obsolete inventory is based on current estimates of
future product demand, market conditions and related management
judgment. Any significant unanticipated changes in future product
demand or market conditions that vary from current expectations
could have an impact on the value of inventories.
Intangible assets: Intangible assets include licensing
rights and are accounted for based on the fair value of
consideration given or the fair value of the net assets acquired,
whichever is more reliable. Intangible assets with finite useful
lives are amortized using the straight-line method over a period of
10 years, or, for licensed patent rights, the remaining term
of the patents underlying licensing rights (considered to be the
remaining useful life of the license), whichever is shorter. The
useful lives of subsequent milestone payments that are capitalized
are the remaining useful life of the initial licensing payment that
was capitalized.
Leasehold improvements and equipment, net: Leasehold
improvements and equipment are carried at cost and depreciated on
the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated useful
life of each asset or lease term. Leasehold improvements and
equipment are comprised of leasehold improvements, laboratory
equipment, furniture and fixtures, and computer equipment.
Depreciation on equipment under finance lease is included with
depreciation on owned assets. Maintenance and repairs are charged
to operating expenses as they are incurred. Improvements and
betterments, which extend the lives of the assets, are
capitalized.
Long-lived
assets are reviewed for impairment on a periodic basis and when
changes in circumstances indicate the possibility that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets are grouped at the
lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely
independent of the cash flows of other assets. If the forecast of
undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of
the assets, an impairment charge would be recognized to reduce the
carrying value of the assets to fair value. If a possible
impairment is identified, the asset group’s fair value is
measured relying primarily on a discounted cash flow
methodology.
Customer deposits: Customer deposits represent cash received
from customers in advance of product shipment or delivery of
services.
Income taxes:
Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred
tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred
liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences.
Temporary differences are the differences between the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax
assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of
management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws
and rates on the date of enactment.
The
Company has not recorded a reserve for any tax positions for which
the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is
uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. The Company
files tax returns in all appropriate jurisdictions, which include a
U.S. federal tax return and various state tax returns. Open tax
years for these jurisdictions are 2016 to 2019, which statutes
expire in 2020 to 2023, respectively. When and if applicable,
potential interest and penalty costs are accrued as incurred, with
expenses recognized in general and administrative expenses in the
statements of operations. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has
no liability for unrecognized tax benefits.
Research and development costs: Research and development
costs consist of direct and indirect costs associated with the
development of the Company’s technologies. These costs are
expensed as incurred.
Advertising: The Company expenses the production costs of
advertising the first time the advertising takes place.
Advertising expense for the periods ended December 31, 2019 and
December 31, 2018 were approximately $6,689,000 and $8,764,000,
respectively.
Share-based compensation: The Company has an Equity
Incentive Plan under which the Board of Directors may grant
restricted stock or stock options to employees and non-employees.
Effective October 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2018-07, by
which the accounting for share-based payments to non-employees and
employees is substantially aligned. The ASU supersedes Subtopic
505-50, Equity - Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. Consistent
with the accounting requirement for employee share-based payment
awards, non-employee share-based payment awards now within the
scope of Topic 718 are measured at grant-date fair value of the
equity instruments that the Company is obligated to issue when the
good has been delivered or the service has been rendered and any
other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the
instruments have been satisfied. There was no cumulative effect of
the adoption of this standard.
Share-based
compensation cost is recorded for all option grants and awards of
non-vested stock based on the grant date fair value of the award,
and is recognized over the service period required for the award.
Prior to October 1, 2018, share-based compensation cost for
non-employees was remeasured over the vesting term as
earned.
The
fair value of the Company’s stock options is estimated at the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes based option valuation model.
The volatility assumption is based on the historical volatility of
the Company's common stock. The dividend yield assumption is based
on the Company’s history and expectation of future dividend
payouts on the common stock. The risk-free interest rate is based
on the implied yield available on U.S. treasury zero-coupon issues
with an equivalent remaining term. For the expected term, the
Company uses SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 simplified
method for “plain vanilla” options with following
characteristics: (i) the share options are granted at the market
price on the grant date; (ii) exercisability is conditional on
performing service through the vesting date on most options; (iii)
if an employee terminates service prior to vesting, the employee
would forfeit the share options; (iv) if an employee terminates
service after vesting, the employee would have 30 to 90 days to
exercise the share options; and (v) the share options are
nontransferable and nonhedgeable.
Market
conditions that affect vesting of stock options are considered in
the grant-date fair value. The issues surrounding the valuation for
such awards can be complex and consideration needs to be given for
how the market condition should be incorporated into the valuation
of the award. The Company considers using other valuation
techniques, such as Monte Carlo simulations based on a lattice
approach, to value awards with market conditions.
The
Company recognizes compensation expense over the requisite service
period using the straight-line method for option grants without
performance conditions. For stock options that have both service
and performance conditions, the Company recognizes compensation
expense using the graded attribution method. Compensation expense
for stock options with performance conditions is recognized only
for those awards expected to vest. The Company recognizes
forfeitures when they occur.
From
time to time, the Company awards shares of its common stock to
non-employees for services provided or to be provided. The fair
value of the awards are measured either based on the fair market
value of stock at the date of grant or the value of the services
provided, based on which is more reliably measurable. Since these
stock awards are fully vested and non-forfeitable, upon issuance
the measurement date for the award is usually reached on the date
of the award.
Fair Value Measurement: The Company follows the provisions
of the accounting standard which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and enhances fair value
measurement disclosure. Under these provisions, fair value is
defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”)
in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date.
The
standard establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair
value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the
use on unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable
inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability
developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of
the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the
Company’s assumptions about the assumptions market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed
based on the best information available in the circumstances. The
hierarchy is described below:
Level
1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible
at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value
hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1
inputs.
Level
2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active
markets, but corroborated by market data.
Level
3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is
available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to
Level 3 inputs.
Financial instruments: The estimated fair value of financial
instruments has been determined based on the Company’s
assessment of available market information and appropriate
valuation methodologies. The fair value of the Company’s
financial instruments that are included in current assets and
current liabilities approximates their carrying value due to their
short-term nature.
The
carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for capital lease
obligations are present values of the obligations, excluding the
interest portion.
Recent accounting standards: In June 2016, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2016-13, Financial
Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of
Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The standard’s main
goal is to improve financial reporting by requiring earlier
recognition of credit losses on financing receivables and other
financial assets in scope. The new guidance represents significant
changes to accounting for credit losses: (i) full lifetime expected
credit losses will be recognized upon initial recognition of an
asset in scope; (ii) the current incurred loss impairment model
that recognizes losses when a probable threshold is met will be
replaced with the expected credit loss impairment method without
recognition threshold; and (iii) the expected credit losses
estimate will be based upon historical information, current
conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. ASU 2016-13
introduces two distinctive credit loss impairment models: (i) CECL
impairment model (Subtopic 326-20) applicable to financial assets
measured at amortized cost; and (ii) available-for-sale debt
securities impairment model (Subtopic 326-30). ASU 2016-13 is
effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal
years. Public entities that qualify as a smaller reporting company
can elect to defer compliance effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2022. We are currently evaluating the impact of
our pending adoption of ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial
statements.
Note
4.
Loss Per Share Applicable to Common Stockholders
The
following table sets forth the computations of loss per share
amounts applicable to common stockholders for the years ended
December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
|
Years Ended
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(32,147)
|
$(33,316)
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
$(0.56)
|
$(0.61)
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
(1):
|
57,056
|
55,006
|
|
|
|
Potentially
dilutive securities (2):
|
|
|
Stock
options
|
10,551
|
9,089
|
Warrants
|
-
|
204
|
|
|
|
(1)
Includes approximately 0.2 million shares of restricted stock for
each of the years 2019 and 2018, which are participating securities
that feature voting and dividend rights.
(2)
Excluded from the computation of loss per share as their impact is
antidilutive.
Note
5.
Inventory
The
amounts of major classes of inventory for the periods ended
December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are as
follows:
(In
thousands)
|
2019
|
2018
|
Bulk
ingredients
|
$1,364
|
$2,254
|
Reference
standards
|
635
|
751
|
Consumer Products -
Finished Goods
|
4,877
|
2,450
|
Consumer Products -
Work in Process
|
4,659
|
2,794
|
|
$11,535
|
$8,249
|
Note
6.
Intangible Assets
Intangible
assets consisted of the
following:
(In
thousands)
|
2019
|
2018
|
Weighted
Average
Total
Amortization
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthspan Research
LLC Acquisition
|
$1,346
|
$1,346
|
10
years
|
|
License agreements
and other
|
1,635
|
1,625
|
9
years
|
|
Less accumulated
depreciation
|
(1,670)
|
(1,424)
|
|
|
|
$1,311
|
$1,547
|
|
Amortization expenses
on amortizable intangible assets included in the consolidated
statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and
December 31, 2018 were approximately $246,000 and $235,000,
respectively.
Estimated
aggregate amortization expense for each of the next five
years is as follows:
(In
thousands)
Years ending
December:
|
|
2020
|
$242
|
2021
|
223
|
2022
|
186
|
2023
|
157
|
2024
|
153
|
Thereafter
|
350
|
|
$1,311
|
Note
7.
Leasehold Improvements and Equipment, Net
Leasehold
improvements and equipment consisted of the
following:
(In
thousands)
|
2019
|
2018
|
Useful
Life
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory
equipment
|
$2,859
|
$2,755
|
10
years
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
2,320
|
2,127
|
Lesser of lease
term or estimated useful life
|
Computer
equipment
|
1,104
|
604
|
3 to 5
years
|
Furniture and
fixtures
|
201
|
143
|
7 to 10
years
|
Construction in
progress
|
71
|
7
|
|
|
6,555
|
5,636
|
|
Less accumulated
depreciation
|
2,790
|
2,051
|
|
|
$3,765
|
$3,585
|
|
Depreciation
expenses on leasehold improvements and equipment included in the
consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December
31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were approximately $0.8 million and
$0.6 million, respectively.
Note
8.
Leases
Operating Leases
As of
December 31, 2019, the Company had operating lease assets in right
of use assets of approximately $0.9 million and corresponding
operating lease liabilities of approximately $1.4 million. For the
year ended December 31, 2019, the following were expenses incurred
in connection with operating leases:
(In
thousands)
|
For the Year Ended Dec. 31, 2019
|
Operating
leases
|
|
Operating
lease expense
|
$663
|
Variable
lease expense
|
246
|
Operating
lease expense
|
909
|
Short-term
lease rent expense
|
70
|
Total
expense
|
$979
|
|
At Dec. 31, 2019
|
Weighted-average
remaining lease term (years) – operating leases
|
1.9
|
Weighted-average
discount rate – operating leases
|
8.0%
|
Minimum
future lease payments under operating leases as of December 31,
2019 are as follows:
(In
thousands)
|
|
Year
Ending December 31, 2020
|
$690
|
Year
Ending December 31, 2021
|
614
|
Year
Ending December 31, 2022
|
138
|
Year
Ending December 31, 2023
|
143
|
Year
Ending December 31, 2024
|
25
|
Total
|
1,610
|
Less
present value discount
|
167
|
Operating
lease liabilities
|
1,443
|
Less
current portion
|
595
|
Long-term
obligations under operating leases
|
$848
|
Finance Leases
As of
December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had finance
lease assets in equipment assets of approximately $0.7 million and
$0.7 million, respectively and corresponding finance lease
liabilities of approximately $0.3 million and $0.3 million,
respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and December
31, 2018, following were expenses incurred in connection with
finance leases:
|
For the Year Ended Dec. 31, 2019
|
For the Year Ended Dec. 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
Finance
leases
|
|
|
Amortization
of equipment assets
|
$83
|
$87
|
Interest
on lease liabilities
|
33
|
41
|
Total
expenses
|
$116
|
$128
|
|
|
|
|
At Dec. 31, 2019
|
Weighted-average
remaining lease term (years) – finance leases
|
0.9
|
Weighted-average
discount rate – finance leases
|
8.9%
|
Minimum
future lease payments under finance leases as of December 31, 2019
are as follows:
(In
thousands)
|
|
Year
Ending December 31, 2020
|
$272
|
Year
Ending December 31, 2021
|
18
|
Total
|
290
|
Less
present value discount
|
14
|
Finance
lease liabilities
|
276
|
Less
current portion
|
258
|
Long-term
obligations under finance leases
|
$18
|
Note
9.
Line of Credit
On
November 12, 2019, the Company entered into a business financing
agreement with Western Alliance Bank (the “Credit
Agreement”), in order to establish a formula based revolving
credit line pursuant to which the Company may borrow an aggregate
principal amount of up to $7.0 million, subject to the terms and
conditions of the Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2019, the
Company did not have any outstanding loan payable from this line of
credit arrangement.
The
interest rate as of December 31, 2019 was 6.25%. The interest rate
is calculated at a floating rate per month equal to (a) the greater
of (i) 4.75% per year or (ii) the Prime Rate published by The Wall
Street Journal, plus (b) 1.50 percentage points, plus an additional
5.00 percentage points during any period that an event of default
has occurred and is continuing. The Company’s obligations
under the Credit Agreement are secured by a security interest in
substantially all of the Company’s current and future
personal property assets, including intellectual property. Any
borrowings, interest or other fees or obligations that the Company
owes will become due and payable on November 12, 2021.
The
Credit Agreement includes quick ratio and minimum liquidity
financial covenants. The Company is also subject to a number of
affirmative and restrictive covenants, including covenants
regarding delivery of financial statements, maintenance of
inventory, payment of taxes, maintenance of insurance, dispositions
of property, business combinations or acquisitions and incurrence
of additional indebtedness, among other customary
covenants.
Debt Issuance Costs
The
Company incurred debt issuance costs of approximately $0.1 million
in connection with this line of credit arrangement and had an
unamortized balance of approximately $0.1 million as of December
31, 2019. For the line of credit arrangement, the Company elected a
policy to keep the debt issuance costs as an asset, regardless of
whether an amount is drawn. The remaining unamortized deferred
asset will be amortized over the remaining life of the line of
credit arrangement.
Note
10.
Deferred Revenue
In
December 2018, the Company entered into a supply agreement with
Nestec Ltd. (“Nestlé”), pursuant to which
Nestlé is the exclusive customer for NIAGEN® for human
use in the (i) medical nutritional and (ii) functional food and
beverage categories in certain territories. As consideration for
the rights granted to Nestlé, the Company received an upfront
fee of $4.0 million in January 2019. The Company determined that
the $4.0 million upfront fee is treated as advance payment for
future goods or services and to utilize the output method to
recognize the upfront fee as revenue as the product is delivered to
Nestlé. In utilizing the output method, the Company estimated
total delivery volume to Nestlé over the course of the supply
agreement.
Revenue
recognized from deferred revenue was as follows:
|
Year
ending
|
At
|
At
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Dec.
31, 2019
|
Dec.
31, 2018
|
Dec.
31, 2019
|
Dec.
31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
recognized from deferred revenue
|
$127
|
$-
|
|
|
Deferred
Revenue Balance
|
|
|
$3,873
|
$-
|
Note
11.
Income Taxes
At
December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company maintained a
full valuation allowance against the entire deferred income tax
balance which resulted in an effective tax rates of 0% for both
years 2019 and 2018. At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we
recorded a valuation allowance of $30.3 million and $21.9 million,
respectively. The valuation allowance increased by $8.4 million
during 2019.
A
reconciliation of income taxes computed at the
statutory federal income tax rate to income taxes as reflected in
the financial statements is summarized as follows:
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax
expense at statutory rate
|
(21.0)%
|
(21.0)%
|
State income tax,
net of federal benefit
|
(6.4)%
|
(6.6)%
|
Permanent
differences
|
1.1%
|
1.1%
|
Changes of state
net operating losses
|
0.3%
|
(0.5)%
|
Change in stock
options and restricted stock
|
(0.2)%
|
0.0%
|
Change in valuation
allowance
|
26.2%
|
27.1%
|
Other
|
0.0%
|
(0.1)%
|
Effective tax
rate
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
The
deferred income tax
assets and liabilities consisted of the following components as of
December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
(In
thousands)
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax
assets:
|
|
|
Net operating loss
carryforward
|
$24,233
|
$17,957
|
Stock options and
restricted stock
|
3,988
|
2,654
|
Interest
expense
|
278
|
-
|
Inventory
reserve
|
353
|
222
|
Allowance for
doubtful accounts
|
758
|
168
|
Accrued
expenses
|
689
|
831
|
Deferred
revenue
|
-
|
19
|
Leasehold
improvements and equipment
|
14
|
4
|
Intangibles
|
66
|
46
|
Operating
leases
|
152
|
168
|
|
30,531
|
22,069
|
Less valuation
allowance
|
(30,313)
|
(21,932)
|
|
218
|
137
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax
liabilities:
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
(218)
|
(137)
|
|
(218)
|
(137)
|
|
|
|
|
$-
|
$-
|
As of
December 31, 2019, the Company has tax net operating loss
carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of
approximately $91.4 million and $79.4 million, respectively which
begin to expire in the year ending December 31, 2023 and 2022,
respectively. The federal net operating loss carryforward of $51.4
million from 2019 and 2018 can be carried forward indefinitely but
is limited to 80% of taxable income.
Under
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
“Code”), certain ownership changes may subject the
Company to annual limitations on the utilization of its net
operating loss carryforwards. The Company has determined that the
stock issued in the year of 2019 did not create a change in control
under the Section 382 of the Code. The Company will continue to
analyze the potential impact of any additional transactions
undertaken upon the utilization of the net operating losses on a go
forward basis.
The Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act created new Section 951A, which set forth a new
set of tax rules affecting U.S. shareholders of controlled foreign
corporations (“CFCs”). Section 951A defined a new
category of income, global intangible low-taxed income
(“GILTI”), which must be included on the U.S.
shareholder’s tax return as it is earned, regardless of when
it is distributed (similar to subpart F income). This provision is
effective for CFC tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. The
Company has prepared the GILTI calculation for 2019 an there is no
U.S. tax on GILTI for 2019 due to a loss.
The
Company is currently not under examination by the Internal Revenue
Service or any other jurisdictions for any tax years for income
taxes. The Company has not identified any material uncertain tax
positions requiring a reserve as of December 31, 2019 and December
31, 2018.
Note
12.
Related Party Transactions
Sale of consumer products
|
Net sales
Year ended
Dec. 31, 2019
|
Net sales
Year ended
Dec. 31, 2018
|
Trade receivable at
Dec. 31, 2019
|
Trade receivable at
Dec. 31, 2018
|
A.S. Watson Group
|
$7.3 million
|
$2.9 million
|
$0.8 million
|
$0.7 million
|
Horizon Ventures
|
-
|
$0.4 million
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$7.3 million
|
$3.3 million
|
$0.8 million
|
$0.7 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
*A.S.
Watson Group and Horizon Ventures are related parties through
common ownership of an enterprise that beneficially owns more than
10% of the common stock of the Company.
Note
13.
Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities
Our
contract assets consist of unbilled amounts typically resulting
from sales under contracts when the cost-to-cost method of revenue
recognition is utilized and revenue recognized exceeds the amount
billed to the customer. Our contract liabilities consist of advance
payments and billings in excess of costs incurred and deferred
revenue.
Net
contract assets (liabilities) consisted of the
following:
(In
thousands)
|
Dec.
31,
2018
|
Reductions
(1)
|
Additions
(2)
|
Transferred
(3)
|
Dec.
31,
2019
|
Contract
Assets
|
$56
|
$(301)
|
$331
|
$(86)
|
$-
|
Contract
Liabilities - Open Projects (4)
|
101
|
(218)
|
272
|
(155)
|
-
|
Contract
Liabilities - Other Customer Deposits (5)
|
174
|
(131)
|
126
|
-
|
169
|
Net
Contract Assets (Liabilities)
|
$(219)
|
$48
|
$(67)
|
$69
|
$(169)
|
(1)
For contract assets, the amount represents amount billed to the
customer. For
contract liabilities, the amount represents reductions for revenue
recognized.
(2)
For contract assets, the amount represents revenue recognized
during the period using the cost-to-cost method.
For contract liabilities, the amount represents advance payments
received during the period.
(3)
Effective November 1, 2019, the Company completed a spinoff of a
regulatory consulting business unit, Spherix
Consulting Group, Inc. ("Spherix"). The Company assigned to Spherix
all existing consulting contracts and
transferred related contract assets and liabilities.
(4)
Contract liablities from ongoing consulting projects.
(5)
Other customer deposts include payments received for orders not
fulfilled and other advance payments.
For the
years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we recognized
revenues of approximately $143,000 and $95,000 related to our
adjusted contract liabilities at the beginning of the fiscal year
2019 and 2018, respectively.
Note
14.
Share-Based Compensation
Stock Option Plans
At the
discretion of the Company’s board of directors (the
“Board of Directors”) or compensation committee of the
Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”), the
Company may grant options to purchase the Company’s common
stock to certain individuals from time to time. Management and the
Board or Compensation Committee determine the terms of awards which
include the exercise price, vesting conditions and expiration dates
at the time of grant. Expiration dates for stock options are not to
exceed 10 years from their date of issuance.
On June
20, 2017, the stockholders of the Company approved the ChromaDex
Corporation 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2017 Plan"). The
Company's Board of Directors amended the 2017 Plan in January 2018
and the stockholders of the Company approved an amendment to the
2017 plan on June 22, 2018. The 2017 Plan is the successor to the
ChromaDex Corporation Second Amended and Restated 2007 Equity
Incentive Plan (the "2007 Plan"). As of December 31, 2019, under
the 2017 Plan, the Company is authorized to issue stock options
that total no more than the sum of (i) 9,000,000 new shares, (ii)
approximately 384,000 unallocated shares remaining available for
the grant of new awards under the 2007 Plan, (iii) any returning
shares from the 2007 Plan or the 2017 Plan, such as forfeited,
cancelled, or expired shares and (iv) 500,000 shares pursuant to an
inducement award. The remaining number of shares available for
issuance under the 2017 Plan totaled approximately 2.9 million
shares at December 31, 2019.
General Vesting Conditions
The
stock option awards generally vest ratably over a three to
four-year period following grant date after a passage of time.
However, some stock option awards are market or performance based
and vest based on certain triggering events established by the
Compensation Committee, subject to approval by the Board of
Directors.
The
fair value of the Company’s stock options that are not market
or performance based was estimated at the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes based option valuation model. The table below
outlines the weighted average assumptions for options granted
during the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31,
2018.
Year Ended
December
|
2019
|
2018
|
Expected
term
|
6
years
|
6
years
|
Volatility
|
67%
|
69%
|
Dividend
Yield
|
0%
|
0%
|
Risk-free
rate
|
2%
|
3%
|
1)
Service Period Based Stock Options
The
majority of options granted by the Company are comprised of service based
options. These options vest ratably over a defined period following
grant date after a passage of a service period.
The
following table summarizes service period based
stock options activity (in thousands except per share data and
remaining contractual term):
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
||
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Number
of
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Fair
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
|
Value
|
Value
|
Outstanding at
December 30, 2017
|
5,467
|
$3.49
|
6.41
|
|
$13,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
Granted
|
3,071
|
4.29
|
10.00
|
$2.74
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
(131)
|
4.02
|
|
|
$109
|
Options
Expired
|
(245)
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
Options
Forfeited
|
(139)
|
4.21
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2018
|
8,023
|
$3.75
|
7.11
|
|
$2,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
Granted
|
2,603
|
4.03
|
10.00
|
$2.46
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
(402)
|
2.54
|
|
|
$389
|
Options
Expired
|
(3)
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
Options
Forfeited
|
(712)
|
3.89
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2019
|
9,509
|
$3.86
|
6.90
|
|
$6,315*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at
December 31, 2019
|
5,822
|
$3.75
|
5.60
|
|
$4,725*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*The
aggregate intrinsic
values in the table above are based on the Company’s closing
stock price of $4.31 on the last day of business for the year ended
December 31, 2019.
2)
Performance Based Stock Options
The
Company also grants stock option awards that are performance based
and vest based on the achievement of certain criteria established
from time to time by the Compensation Committee. If these
performance criteria are not met, the compensation expenses are not
recognized and the expenses that have been recognized will be
reversed.
The
following table summarizes performance based stock options activity
(in thousands except per share data and remaining contractual
term):
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
||
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Number
of
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Fair
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
|
Value
|
Value
|
Outstanding at
December 30, 2017
|
67
|
$1.89
|
5.08
|
|
|
Options
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2018
|
67
|
$1.89
|
4.08
|
|
|
Options
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
(25)
|
1.89
|
|
$69
|
|
Options
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2019
|
42
|
$1.89
|
3.08
|
|
$101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at
December 31, 2019
|
42
|
$1.89
|
3.08
|
|
$101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
aggregate intrinsic value in the table above are, based on the
Company’s closing stock price of $4.31 on the last day of
business for the period ended December 31, 2019.
3)
Market Based Stock Options
The
Company also grants stock option awards that are market based which
have vesting conditions associated with a service condition as well
as performance of the Company's stock price. The following table
summarizes market based stock options activity (in thousands except
per share data and remaining contractual term):
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
||
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Number
of
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Fair
|
Intrinsic
|
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
|
Value
|
Value
|
Outstanding at
December 30, 2017
|
1,000
|
$4.24
|
9.76
|
|
|
Options
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2018
|
1,000
|
$4.24
|
8.76
|
|
|
Options
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2019
|
1,000
|
$4.24
|
7.76
|
|
$70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at
December 31, 2019
|
722
|
$4.24
|
7.76
|
|
$51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
aggregate intrinsic value in the table above are, based on the
Company’s closing stock price of $4.31 on the last day of
business for the period ended December 31, 2019.
Total Remaining Unamortized Compensation for Stock
Options
As of
December 31, 2019, there was approximately $8.2 million of total
unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested share-based
compensation arrangements granted under the plans for stock
options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 1.7 years.
Restricted Stock Awards
Restricted
stock awards granted by the Company to employees have vesting
conditions that are unique to each award.
The
following table summarizes activity of restricted stock awards granted
(in thousands except per share fair value):
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
Shares
|
Fair
Value
|
Unvested shares at
December 30, 2017
|
185
|
$3.28
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
(2)
|
5.28
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Unvested shares at
December 31, 2018
|
183
|
$3.25
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Unvested shares at
December 31, 2019
|
183
|
$3.25
|
|
|
|
Expected to Vest as
of December 31, 2019
|
183
|
$3.25
|
|
|
|
Performance Stock Awards
During
the fiscal year 2019 and 2018, the Compensation Committee approved
grants of 166,666 shares and 333,334 shares, respectively, of
fully-vested restricted stock to Robert Fried, the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer. The shares were granted pursuant to his
employment agreement, which provided for the stock grants upon the
achievement of certain performance goals. The expense recognized
for the fiscal year 2019 and 2018 for the awarded shares were
approximately $0.7 million and $1.3 million,
respectively.
Share-based Compensation
Share-based
compensation expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and
December 31, 2018 were as follows:
|
Year
ending
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
Dec. 31, 2019
|
Dec.
31, 2018
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
$107
|
$85
|
Sales
and marketing
|
731
|
346
|
Research
and development
|
529
|
353
|
General
and administrative
|
5,805
|
5,587
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$7,172
|
$6,371
|
Note
15.
Stock Issuance and Conversion of Convertible Notes
Stock Issuance
On
August 13, 2019, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement with certain purchasers, pursuant to which the Company
agreed to sell and issue an aggregate of $7.0 million of the
Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $4.465 per
share (the “Financing”). On August 15, 2019, the
Company closed the Financing and issued approximately 1.6 million
shares of its Common Stock. The Company received proceeds of $6.8
million, net of offering costs.
Conversion of Convertible Notes
On May
17, 2019, the Company closed a financing transaction and issued
convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”) in the
aggregate principal amount of $10.0 million to Winsave Resources
Limited and Pioneer Step Holdings Limited. The maturity date of the
Notes was originally July 1, 2019 and was subsequently extended to
August 15, 2019. The Notes accrued interest at a rate of 5.0% per
annum for a total of approximately $123,000 through the maturity
date. On the maturity date, the Notes automatically converted into
approximately 2.3 million shares of the Company’s common
stock at a price of $4.465 per share.
Summary of Convertible Notes
Description
|
Modified
Conversion
Price
*
|
Original
Conversion
Price
|
Extended
Maturity
Date
|
Original
Maturity
Date
|
Amount
(In
thousands)
|
Principal
|
$4.465
|
$4.590
|
August
15, 2019
|
July
1, 2019
|
$10,000
|
Interest
at a rate of 5.0% per annum
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
Total
Amount Converted for 2.3 million shares
|
$10,123
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
Discount - Issuance costs
|
565
|
||||
Debt
Discount - Down round feature
|
282
|
||||
Total
Debt Discount recognized as Interest Expense
|
$847
|
* The conversion price has a down round feature. The original
conversion price of $4.59 was lowered to $4.465 due to the
Financing.
Debt Issuance Costs
In
connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company incurred
issuance costs of approximately $565,000. The issuance costs were
recorded as a debt discount and were amortized as interest expense
using the effective interest method over the original term of 45
days.
Down Round Feature
The Notes had adjustments which meet the definition of a
down round feature per ASU 2017-11. Pursuant to the terms of the
Notes, the conversion price per share was adjusted downward from
$4.59 to $4.465 as the Company closed the Financing on the Maturity
Date. As allowed under ASU 2017-11, the Company excluded such down
round feature when determining whether the instrument is indexed to
the entity’s own stock and did not bifurcate the down round
feature from the loan host.
In
accordance with ASU 2017-11, the Company recognized the value of
the triggered down round as a beneficial conversion discount to
earnings. The Note purchasers obtained approximately additional
62,000 shares of the Company’s common stock due to the down
round feature with an incremental intrinsic value of approximately
$282,000. This amount was initially recognized as debt discount and
was amortized as interest expense.
Along
with the issuance cost of the Notes, the Company recorded a total
of approximately $0.8 million as interest expense in amortization
of debt discounts during the year ended December 31,
2019.
Debt Modification
On June
30, 2019, the Company and the Purchasers entered into an Omnibus
Amendment to the Purchase Agreement and the Notes to (i) remove the
restriction on the Company issuing common stock during the a
certain restricted period and (ii) amend the Notes to extend the
maturity date by 45 days from July 1, 2019 to August 15, 2019. The
amendment to extend the maturity date for another 45 days to August
15, 2019 was recognized as a modification of the
Notes.
Note
16.
Warrants
The
following table summarizes activity of warrants at December 31,
2019 and December 31, 2018 and changes during the years then ended
(in thousands except per share data and remaining contractual
term):
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Number
of
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
|
Outstanding and
exercisable at December 30, 2017
|
470
|
$4.15
|
2.17
|
Warrants
Issued
|
-
|
-
|
|
Warrants
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
Warrants
Expired
|
(266)
|
4.50
|
|
Outstanding and
exercisable at December 31, 2018
|
204
|
3.69
|
0.57
|
Warrants
Issued
|
-
|
-
|
|
Warrants
Exercised
|
(140)
|
3.19
|
|
Warrants
Expired
|
(64)
|
4.80
|
|
Outstanding and
exercisable at December 31, 2019
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
Note
17.
Commitments and Contingencies
Purchase obligations
The
Company enters into purchase obligations with various vendors for
goods and services that we need for our operations. The purchase
obligations for goods and services include inventory, research and
development, and laboratory supplies. Minimum future payments under
purchase obligations as of December 31, 2019 are as
follows:
(In
thousands)
Fiscal year
ending:
|
|
2020
|
$11,520
|
|
$11,520
|
Royalty
The
Company has nine licensing agreements with leading research
universities and other patent holders, pursuant to which the
Company acquired patents related to certain products the Company
offers to its customers. These agreements afford for royalty
payments based on contractual minimums and expire at various dates
from December 31, 2019 through an estimated year of 2037. Yearly
minimum royalty payments including license maintenance fees range
from $10,000 per year to $100,000 per year, however, these minimum
payments escalate each year with a maximum of $150,000 per year. In
addition, the Company is required to pay a range of 2% to 5% of
sales related to the licensed products under these agreements.
Total royalty expenses including license maintenance fees for the
years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were
approximately $2.7 million and $1.7 million, respectively under
these agreements. Minimum royalties including license maintenance
fees for the next five years are as follows:
(In
thousands)
Fiscal years
ending:
|
|
2020
|
$342
|
2021
|
360
|
2022
|
361
|
2023
|
363
|
2024
|
364
|
|
$1,790
|
Operating lease guarantee
Effective
November 1, 2019, the Company completed a spinoff of a regulatory
consulting business unit, Spherix Consulting Group, Inc.
(“Spherix”). As part of the spinoff transaction, the
Company’s existing lease in Maryland was assigned from the
Company to Spherix, whom assumed all rights, title, obligations,
and interests in the lease. The Company remained a guarantor on the
lease. The term on the lease expires in April 2021. Future minimum
lease payments are approximately $46,000 in 2020 and $16,000 in
2021. If Spherix becomes insolvent, the Company may be obligated to
pay these amounts. Based on the financial health of Spherix as of
the transaction date, the Company does not believe it is probable
it will have to make any performance on this
guarantee.
Legal proceedings
- Elysium Health, LLC
(A) California Action
On December 29, 2016, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a complaint in the
United States District Court for the Central District of
California, naming Elysium Health, Inc. (together with Elysium
Health, LLC, “Elysium”) as defendant (the
“Complaint”). On January 25, 2017, Elysium filed an
answer and counterclaims in response to the Complaint (together
with the Complaint, the “California Action”). Over the
course of the California Action, the parties have each filed
amended pleadings several times and have each engaged in several
rounds of motions to dismiss and one round of motion for judgment
on the pleadings with respect to various claims. Most recently, on
November 27, 2018, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a fifth amended complaint
that added an individual, Mark Morris, as a defendant. Elysium and
Morris (“the Defendants”) moved to dismiss on December
21, 2018. The court denied Defendants’ motion on February 4,
2019. Defendants filed their answer to ChromaDex, Inc.'s fifth
amended complaint on February 19, 2019. ChromaDex, Inc. filed an
answer to Elysium’s restated counterclaims on March 5, 2019.
Discovery closed on August 9, 2019.
On August 16, 2019, the parties filed motions for partial summary
judgment as to certain claims and counterclaims. The parties filed
opposition briefs on August 28, 2019, and reply briefs on September
4, 2019. On October 9, 2019, among other things, the court vacated
the previously scheduled trial date, ordered supplemental briefing
with respect to certain issues related to summary judgment. Elysium
filed its opening supplemental brief on October 30, 2019, ChromaDex
filed its opening supplemental brief on November 18, 2019, and
Elysium filed a reply brief on November 27, 2019, and the court
heard argument on January 13, 2020. On January 16, 2020, the court
granted both parties’ motions for summary judgment in part
and denied both in part. On ChromaDex’s motion, the court
granted summary judgment in favor of ChromaDex on Elysium’s
counterclaims for (i) breach of contract related to manufacturing
NIAGEN® according to the defined standard, selling NIAGEN and
ingredients that are substantially similar to pterostilbene to
other customers, distributing the NIAGEN® product
specifications, and failing to provide information concerning the
quality and identity of NIAGEN®, and (ii) breach of the
implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The court denied
summary judgment on Elysium’s counterclaims for (i)
fraudulent inducement of the Trademark License and Royalty
Agreement, dated February 3, 2014, by and between ChromaDex, Inc.
and Elysium (the “License Agreement”), (ii) patent
misuse, and (iii) unjust enrichment. On Elysium’s motion, the
court granted summary judgment in favor of Elysium on
ChromaDex’s claim for damages related to $110,000 in avoided
costs arising from documents that Elysium used in violation of the
Supply Agreement, dated February 3, 2014, by and between ChromaDex,
Inc. and Elysium, as amended (the “NIAGEN® Supply
Agreement”). The court denied summary judgment on
Elysium’s counterclaim for breach of contract related to
certain refunds or credits to Elysium. The court also denied
summary judgment on ChromaDex’s breach of contract claim
against Morris and claims for disgorgement of $8.3 million in
Elysium’s resale profits, $600,000 for a price discount
received by Elysium, and $684,781 in Morris’s
compensation.
Following the court’s January 16, 2020 order, the claims that
ChromaDex, Inc. presently asserts in the California Action, among
other allegations, are that (i) Elysium breached the Supply
Agreement, dated June 26, 2014, by and between ChromaDex, Inc. and
Elysium (the “pTeroPure® Supply Agreement”), by
failing to make payments to ChromaDex, Inc. for purchases of
pTeroPure® and by improper disclosure of confidential
ChromaDex, Inc. information pursuant to the pTeroPure® Supply
Agreement, (ii) Elysium breached the NIAGEN® Supply Agreement,
by failing to make payments to ChromaDex, Inc. for purchases of
NIAGEN®, (iii) Defendants willfully and maliciously
misappropriated ChromaDex, Inc. trade secrets concerning its
ingredient sales business under both the California Uniform Trade
Secrets Act and the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, (iv) Morris
breached two confidentiality agreements he signed by improperly
stealing confidential ChromaDex, Inc. documents and information,
(v) Morris breached his fiduciary duty to ChromaDex, Inc. by lying
to and competing with ChromaDex, Inc. while still employed there,
and (vi) Elysium aided and abetted Morris’s breach of
fiduciary duty. ChromaDex, Inc. is seeking damages and interest for
Elysium’s alleged breaches of the NIAGEN® Supply
Agreement and pTeroPure® Supply Agreement and Morris’s
alleged breaches of his confidentiality agreements, compensatory
damages and interest, punitive damages, injunctive relief, and
attorney’s fees for Defendants’ alleged willful and
malicious misappropriation of ChromaDex, Inc.’s trade
secrets, and compensatory damages and interest, disgorgement of all
benefits received, and punitive damages for Morris’s alleged
breach of his fiduciary duty and Elysium’s aiding and
abetting of that alleged breach.
The claims that Elysium presently alleges in the California Action
are that (i) ChromaDex, Inc. breached the NIAGEN® Supply
Agreement by not issuing certain refunds or credits to Elysium,
(ii) ChromaDex, Inc. fraudulently induced Elysium into entering
into the License Agreement, (iv) ChromaDex, Inc.’s conduct
constitutes misuse of its patent rights, and (v) ChromaDex, Inc.
was unjustly enriched by the royalties Elysium paid pursuant to the
License Agreement. Elysium is seeking damages for ChromaDex,
Inc.’s alleged breaches of the NIAGEN® Supply Agreement,
and compensatory damages, punitive damages, and/or rescission of
the License Agreement and restitution of any royalty payments
conveyed by Elysium pursuant to the License Agreement, and a
declaratory judgment that ChromaDex, Inc. has engaged in patent
misuse.
On January 17, 2020, Elysium moved to substitute its counsel. The
same day, the court ordered hearing on that motion for January 21,
2020, and granted Elysium’s motion at the hearing. On January
23, 2020, the court issued a scheduling order that, among other
things, set trial on the remaining claims to begin on May 12,
2020.
(B) Patent Office Proceedings
On July 17, 2017, Elysium filed petitions with the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office for inter
partes review of U.S.
Patents 8,197,807 (the “’807 Patent”) and
8,383,086 (the “’086 Patent”), patents to which
ChromaDex, Inc. is the exclusive licensee. The Patent Trial and
Appeal Board (“PTAB”) denied institution of
the inter
partes review for the
’807 Patent on January 18, 2018. On January 29, 2018, the
PTAB granted institution of the inter
partes review as to claims
1 and 3-5 and denied institution as to claim 2 of the ’086
Patent. Based upon a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, and solely
on a procedural basis, the PTAB was required to include claim 2 in
the trial of the inter
partes review. The matter
was heard on October 2, 2018. The PTAB issued its written decision
on January 16, 2019, upholding claim 2 of the ’086 Patent
which relates to the use of isolated NR in a pharmaceutical
composition as valid. Elysium is now prevented from raising
invalidity arguments against the ’086 Patent in the ongoing
patent litigation in Delaware that it brought or could have brought
before the PTAB in its inter
partes review. Elysium
appealed the PTAB’s decision with respect to claim 2 on March
6, 2019. A cross-appeal with respect to claims 1 and 3–5 was
filed on March 20, 2019. Elysium filed its opening brief on June
17, 2019. Dartmouth moved to voluntarily dismiss its cross-appeal
on August 14, 2019. The motion was granted on August 18, 2019.
Dartmouth’s response brief was filed on August 28, 2019.
Elysium’s reply brief was filed on October 9, 2019.
Oral
argument on Elysium’s appeal was heard on March 5, 2020. On
March 6, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s decision, rejecting Elysium's
attempt to invalidate claim 2 of the '086 patent.
(C) Southern District of New York Action
On September 27, 2017, Elysium Health Inc. ("Elysium Health") filed
a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York, against ChromaDex, Inc. (the “Elysium
SDNY Complaint”). Elysium Health alleges in the Elysium SDNY
Complaint that ChromaDex, Inc. made false and misleading statements
in a citizen petition to the Food and Drug Administration it filed
on or about August 18, 2017. Among other allegations, Elysium
Health avers that the citizen petition made Elysium Health’s
product appear dangerous, while casting ChromaDex, Inc.’s own
product as safe. The Elysium SDNY Complaint asserts four claims for
relief: (i) false advertising under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.
§ 1125(a); (ii) trade libel; (iii) deceptive business
practices under New York General Business Law § 349; and (iv)
tortious interference with prospective economic relations.
ChromaDex, Inc. denies the claims in the Elysium SDNY Complaint and
intends to defend against them vigorously. On October 26, 2017,
ChromaDex, Inc. moved to dismiss the Elysium SDNY Complaint on the
grounds that, inter alia, its statements in the citizen petition
are immune from liability under the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine, the
litigation privilege, and New York’s Anti-SLAPP statute, and
that the Elysium SDNY Complaint failed to state a claim. Elysium
Health opposed the motion on November 2, 2017. ChromaDex, Inc.
filed its reply on November 9, 2017.
On October 26, 2017, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a complaint in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
against Elysium Health (the “ChromaDex SDNY
Complaint”). ChromaDex, Inc. alleges that Elysium Health made
material false and misleading statements to consumers in the
promotion, marketing, and sale of its health supplement product,
Basis, and asserts five claims for relief: (i) false advertising
under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1125(a); (ii) unfair
competition under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); (iii) deceptive
practices under New York General Business Law § 349; (iv)
deceptive practices under New York General Business Law § 350;
and (v) tortious interference with prospective economic advantage.
On November 16, 2017, Elysium Health moved to dismiss for failure
to state a claim. ChromaDex, Inc. opposed the motion on November
30, 2017 and Elysium Health filed a reply on December 7,
2017.
On November 3, 2017, the Court consolidated the Elysium SDNY
Complaint and the ChromaDex SDNY Complaint actions under the
caption In re Elysium Health-ChromaDex Litigation, 17-cv-7394, and
stayed discovery in the consolidated action pending a Court-ordered
mediation. The mediation was unsuccessful. On September 27, 2018,
the Court issued a combined ruling on both parties’ motions
to dismiss. For ChromaDex’s motion to dismiss, the Court
converted the part of the motion on the issue of whether the
citizen petition is immune under the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine into
a motion for summary judgment, and requested supplemental evidence
from both parties, which were submitted on October 29, 2018. The
Court otherwise denied the motion to dismiss. On January 3, 2019,
the Court granted ChromaDex, Inc.’s motion for summary
judgment under the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine and dismissed all
claims in the Elysium SDNY Complaint. Elysium moved for
reconsideration on January 17, 2019. The Court denied
Elysium’s motion for reconsideration on February 6, 2019, and
issued an amended final order granting ChromaDex, Inc.’s
motion for summary judgment as on February 7, 2019.
The Court granted in part and denied in part Elysium’s motion
to dismiss, sustaining three grounds for ChromaDex’s Lanham
Act claims while dismissing two others, sustaining the claim under
New York General Business Law § 349, and dismissing the claims
under New York General Business Law § 350 and for tortious
interference. Elysium filed an answer and counterclaims on October
10, 2018, alleging claims for (i) false advertising under the
Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1125(a); (ii) unfair competition under
15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); and (iii) deceptive practices under New
York General Business Law § 349. ChromaDex answered
Elysium’s counterclaims on November 2, 2018.
ChromaDex, Inc. filed an amended complaint on March 27, 2019,
adding new claims against Elysium Health for false advertising and
unfair competition under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
On April 10, 2019, Elysium Health answered the amended complaint
and filed amended counterclaims, also adding new claims against
ChromaDex, Inc. for false advertising and unfair competition under
the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). On July 1, 2019, Elysium
Health filed further amended counterclaims, adding new claims under
the Copyright Act §§ 106 & 501. On February 9, 2020,
ChromaDex, Inc. filed a motion for leave to amend its complaint to
add additional claims against Elysium Health for false advertising
and unfair competition. On February 10, 2020, Elysium Health filed
a motion for leave to amend its counterclaims to identify allegedly
false and misleading statements in ChromaDex’s advertising.
Those motions remain pending and the parties are currently in
discovery.
The Company is unable to predict the outcome of these matters and,
at this time, cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range
of loss with respect to the legal proceedings discussed herein. As
of December 31, 2019, ChromaDex, Inc. did not accrue a potential
loss for the California Action or the Elysium SDNY Complaint
because ChromaDex, Inc. believes that the allegations are without
merit and thus it is not probable that a liability has been
incurred.
(D) Delaware – Patent Infringement Action
On September 17, 2018, ChromaDex, Inc. and Trustees of Dartmouth
College filed a patent infringement complaint in the United States
District Court for the District of Delaware against Elysium Health,
Inc. The complaint alleges that Elysium’s BASIS® dietary
supplement violates U.S. Patents 8,197,807 (the “’807
Patent”) and 8,383,086 (the “’086 Patent”)
that comprise compositions containing isolated nicotinamide
riboside held by Dartmouth and licensed exclusively to ChromaDex,
Inc. On October 23, 2018, Elysium filed an answer to the complaint.
The answer asserts various affirmative defenses and denies that
Plaintiffs are entitled to any relief.
On November 7, 2018, Elysium filed a motion to stay the patent
infringement proceedings pending resolution of (1)
the inter
partes review of the
’807 Patent and the ’086 Patent before the Patent Trial
and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) and (2) the outcome of the
litigation in the California Action. ChromaDex, Inc. filed an
opposition brief on November 21, 2018 detailing the issues with
Elysium’s motion to stay. In particular, ChromaDex, Inc.
argued that given claim 2 of the ’086 Patent was only
included in the PTAB’s inter
partes review for
procedural reasons the PTAB was unlikely to invalidate claim 2 and
therefore litigation in Delaware would continue regardless. In
addition, ChromaDex, Inc. argued that the litigation in the
California Action is unlikely to have a significant effect on the
ongoing patent litigation. After the PTAB released its written
decision upholding claim 2 of the ’086 Patent, proving right
ChromaDex, Inc.’s prediction, ChromaDex, Inc. informed the
Delaware court of the PTAB’s decision on January 17, 2019. On
June 19, 2019, the Delaware court granted in part and denied in
part Elysium’s motion, ordering that the case was stayed
pending the resolution of Elysium’s patent misuse
counterclaim in the California Action.
On November 1, 2019, ChromaDex, Inc. filed a motion to lift the
stay due to changed circumstances in the California Action, among
other reasons. Briefing on the motion was completed on November 22,
2019. On January 6, 2020, the Delaware court issued an oral order
instructing the parties to submit a joint status report after the
January 13, 2020 motions hearing in the California Action. The
joint status report was submitted on January 30, 2020. On February
4, 2020, the Delaware court issued an order granting ChromaDex,
Inc.’s motion to lift the stay and setting a scheduling
conference for March 10, 2020.
Legal proceedings – Utah Lanham Act Action
On March 6, 2019, Novex Biotech LLC (“Novex”) filed an
action in the Third Judicial District Court County of Salt Lake,
State of Utah against ChromaDex, Inc. and 10 fictional defendants.
The complaint alleges that Novex markets a dietary supplement,
Oxydrene Elite, that competes with ChromaDex’s product, TRU
NIAGEN. The complaint further alleges that ChromaDex, Inc. has
violated the Lanham Act by making false or misleading claims for
TRU NIAGEN. Novex is seeking an injunction and damages for the
competitive harm it alleges to have suffered.
ChromaDex, Inc. timely removed the action to federal court in the
District of Utah. ChromaDex answered the complaint and also filed
counterclaims against Novex under the Lanham Act and California
state law. ChromaDex’s counterclaims allege that Novex has
falsely advertised its product called Oxydrene. Novex moved to
dismiss the counterclaims and ChromaDex has opposed this motion.
Discovery in the case is ongoing and no hearing has been set for
Novex’s motion to dismiss.
The Company is unable to predict the outcome of this matter and, at
this time, cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of
loss with respect to the legal proceedings discussed herein. As of
December 31, 2019, ChromaDex, Inc. did not accrue a potential loss
for the Utah Lanham Act action because ChromaDex, Inc. believes
that the allegations are without merit and thus it is not probable
that a liability has been incurred.
From time to time we are involved in legal proceedings arising in
the ordinary course of our business. We believe that there is no
other litigation pending that is likely to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our financial condition
or results of operations.
Note
18.
Business Segmentation and Geographical Distribution
The
Company has the following three reportable segments for the years
ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
●
Consumer
products segment: provides finished dietary supplement products
that contain the Company's proprietary ingredients directly to
consumers as well as to distributors.
●
Ingredients
segment: develops and commercializes proprietary-based ingredient
technologies and supplies these ingredients as raw materials to the
manufacturers of consumer products in various industries including
the nutritional supplement, food, beverage and animal health
industries.
●
Analytical
reference standards and services segment: includes (i) supply of
phytochemical reference standards, (ii) scientific and regulatory
consulting and (iii) other research and development
services.
Effective
November 1, 2019, the Company completed a spinoff of Spherix, a
regulatory consulting business unit. The net sales generated by
Spherix for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018
were approximately $694,000 and $597,000,
respectively.
The
“Corporate and other” classification includes corporate
items not allocated by the Company to each reportable segment.
Further, there are no intersegment sales that require elimination.
The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on
reviewing gross margin by reportable segment. The discontinued
operations are not included in following statement of operations
for business segments.
Year
ended
|
Consumer
|
|
Analytical
Reference
|
|
|
December
31, 2019
|
Products
|
Ingredients
|
Standards
and
|
Corporate
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
segment
|
segment
|
Services
segment
|
and
other
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
$36,075
|
$6,196
|
$4,020
|
$-
|
$46,291
|
Cost
of sales
|
14,550
|
2,980
|
2,992
|
-
|
20,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
21,525
|
3,216
|
1,028
|
-
|
25,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
and marketing
|
17,343
|
245
|
628
|
-
|
18,216
|
Research
and development
|
3,699
|
721
|
-
|
-
|
4,420
|
General
and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
34,308
|
34,308
|
Other
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
125
|
125
|
Operating expenses
|
21,042
|
966
|
628
|
34,433
|
57,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
$483
|
$2,250
|
$400
|
$(34,433)
|
$(31,300)
|
Year
ended
|
Consumer
|
|
Analytical
Reference
|
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
Products
|
Ingredients
|
Standards
and
|
Corporate
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
segment
|
segment
|
Services
segment
|
and
other
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
$18,451
|
$8,565
|
$4,541
|
$-
|
$31,557
|
Cost
of sales
|
7,222
|
4,831
|
3,449
|
-
|
15,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
11,229
|
3,734
|
1,092
|
-
|
16,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
and marketing
|
15,063
|
727
|
747
|
-
|
16,537
|
Research
and development
|
3,852
|
1,626
|
-
|
-
|
5,478
|
General
and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
27,137
|
27,137
|
Other
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
75
|
75
|
Operating expenses
|
18,915
|
2,353
|
747
|
27,212
|
49,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
$(7,686)
|
$1,381
|
$345
|
$(27,212)
|
$(33,172)
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Analytical
Reference
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2019
|
Products
|
Ingredients
|
Standards
and
|
Corporate
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
segment
|
segment
|
Services
segment
|
and
other
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
$12,137
|
$2,135
|
$918
|
$25,057
|
$40,247
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Analytical
Reference
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2018
|
Products
|
Ingredients
|
Standards
and
|
Corporate
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
segment
|
segment
|
Services
segment
|
and
other
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
$7,407
|
$5,412
|
$1,213
|
$28,200
|
$42,232
|
Disaggregation of revenue
We
disaggregate our revenue from contracts with customers by type of
goods or services for each of our segments, as we believe it best
depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of our
revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. See
details in the tables below.
Year
Ended December 31, 2019
(In
thousands)
|
Consumer
Products
Segment
|
Ingredients
Segment
|
Analytical
Reference Standards
and
Services
Segment
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRU
NIAGEN®, Consumer Product
|
$36,075
|
$-
|
$-
|
$36,075
|
NIAGEN®
Ingredient
|
-
|
4,879
|
-
|
4,879
|
Subtotal
NIAGEN Related
|
$36,075
|
$4,879
|
$-
|
$40,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Ingredients
|
-
|
1,317
|
-
|
1,317
|
Reference
Standards
|
-
|
-
|
3,064
|
3,064
|
Consulting
and Other
|
-
|
-
|
956
|
956
|
Subtotal
Other Goods and Services
|
$-
|
$1,317
|
$4,020
|
$5,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Net Sales
|
$36,075
|
$6,196
|
$4,020
|
$46,291
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2018
(In
thousands)
|
Consumer
Products
Segment
|
Ingredients
Segment
|
Analytical
Reference Standards
and
Services
Segment
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRU
NIAGEN®, Consumer Product
|
$18,451
|
$-
|
$-
|
$18,451
|
NIAGEN®
Ingredient
|
-
|
5,169
|
-
|
5,169
|
Subtotal
NIAGEN Related
|
$18,451
|
$5,169
|
$-
|
$23,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Ingredients
|
-
|
3,396
|
-
|
3,396
|
Reference
Standards
|
-
|
-
|
3,455
|
3,455
|
Consulting
and Other
|
-
|
-
|
1,086
|
1,086
|
Subtotal
Other Goods and Services
|
$-
|
$3,396
|
$4,541
|
$7,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Net Sales
|
$18,451
|
$8,565
|
$4,541
|
$31,557
|
Revenues from international sources
Revenues from International Sources
|
Year ended
Dec. 31, 2019
|
Year ended
Dec. 31, 2018
|
Consumer Products Segment
|
$10.8 million
|
$4.2 million
|
Ingredients Segment
|
$0.6 million
|
$0.6 million
|
Analytical Reference Standards and Services Segment
|
$1.8 million
|
$1.7 million
|
Total
|
$13.2 million
|
$6.5 million
|
*International
sources include Europe, North America, South America, Asia and
Oceania.
Long-lived assets
The
Company’s long-lived assets are located within the United
States.
Disclosure of major customers
Major
customers who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s
total sales were as follows:
|
Years
Ended
|
|
Major
Customers
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
A.S.
Watson Group - Related Party
|
15.8%
|
*
|
Life
Extension
|
*
|
10.0%
|
|
|
|
*
Represents less than 10%.
|
|
|
Major
customers who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s
total trade receivables were as follows:
|
Percentage
of the Company's Total Trade Receivables
|
|
Major
Customers
|
At
December 31, 2019
|
At
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
A.S.
Watson Group - Related Party
|
39.0%
|
15.9%
|
Life
Extension
|
27.4%
|
*
|
Elysium
Health (1)
|
*
|
51.2%
|
|
|
|
*
Represents less than 10%.
|
|
|
|
|
(1) There is ongoing litigation with Elysium Health.
Disclosure of major vendors
Major
vendors who accounted for more than 10% of the Company's total
accounts payable were as follows:
|
Percentage
of the Company's Total Accounts Payable
|
|
Major
Vendors
|
At
December 31, 2019
|
At
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
Vendor
A
|
43.1%
|
36.8%
|
Vendor
E
|
*
|
13.2%
|
|
|
|
*
Represents less than 10%.
|
|
|
Note
19.
Subsequent Events
Subsequent
to the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into a
separation agreement with Lisa Bratkovich, the Company’s
former Chief Marketing Officer. Pursuant to the terms of the
agreement, Ms. Bratkovich will receive (a) continuation of her base
salary for 12 months for a total of approximately $350,000, (b)
accelerated vesting of approximately 94,000 stock options that
would have otherwise become vested by the one-year anniversary of
the termination date and a period of three years after the
termination date to exercise any vested stock options and (c)
payment of COBRA group health insurance premiums for up to 12
months.
Item
9.
Changes in and Disagreements
with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
None.
Item
9A.
Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our
management, with the participation of our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer carried out an evaluation
of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as
of December 31, 2019. Pursuant to Rule13a−15(e) promulgated
by the Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the “Exchange Act”) “disclosure
controls and procedures” means controls and other procedures
that are designed to insure that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file with the Commission is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.
“Disclosure controls and procedures” include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to insure that
information that we are required to disclose in the reports we file
with the Commission is accumulated and communicated to our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Based on their evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December
31, 2019.
Inherent Limitations on Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
The
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures is subject
to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations,
judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood
of future events, the soundness of our systems, the possibility of
human error, and the risk of fraud. Moreover, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the
risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions and the risk that the degree of compliance with policies
or procedures may deteriorate over time. Because of these
limitations, there can be no assurance that any system of
disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived,
will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud or in making
all material information known in a timely manner to the
appropriate levels of management.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
were no change in internal controls over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a−15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act)
that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that have materially
affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal
control over financial reporting.
Management Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control
over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of consolidated financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Our internal control over financial reporting include
those policies and procedures that:
(i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
our assets;
(ii)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of our management and
directors; and
(iii)
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated
financial statements.
Our
management, including the undersigned principal executive officer
and principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2019. In conducting its assessment, our management used the
criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework in 2013. Based on this
assessment, our management concluded that, as of December 31,
2019, our internal control over financial reporting was effective
based on those criteria.
Inherent Limitations on Internal Control
Internal
control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance
of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent
limitations, including the possibility of human error and
circumvention by collusion or overriding of control. Accordingly,
even an effective internal control system may not prevent or detect
material misstatements on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the
risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, our internal control over
financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving their objectives.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting
Firm
The
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting has
been audited by Marcum LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report in Item 8 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which expresses an unqualified
opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2019.
Item
9B.
Other Information
None.
PART III
Item
10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information
required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement and
is incorporated herein by reference.
We have
adopted a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the
“Ethics Code”) that applies to all officers, directors
and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal
financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or
persons performing similar functions. The Ethics Code is available
on our website at www.chromadex.com. If we make any substantive
amendments to the Ethics Code or grant any waiver from a provision
of the Ethics Code to any executive officer or director, we will
promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver on our
website or in a Current Report on Form 8-K.
Item
11.
Executive Compensation
Information
required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement and
is incorporated herein by reference.
Item
12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
Information
required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement and
is incorporated herein by reference.
Item
13.
Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions, and
Director Independence
Information
required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement and
is incorporated herein by reference.
Item
14.
Principal Accounting Fees and
Services
Information
required by this item will be contained in the Proxy Statement and
is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
Item
15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement
Schedules
(a)(1) Financial Statements
Reference
is made to Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All
schedules have been omitted because they are not required or
because the required information is given in the Financial
Statements or Notes thereto set forth under Part II, Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(a)(3) List of
Exhibits
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 21, 2008, among Cody, CDI
Acquisition, Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc. as amended on June 10, 2008
(incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-140056)
filed with the Commission on June 24, 2008) (1)
|
|
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 21, 2017, by and among
Covance Laboratories Inc., ChromaDex, Inc., ChromaDex Analytics,
Inc., and ChromaDex Corporation (incorporated by reference to, and
filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on
November 9, 2017)*(2)
|
|
|
Amendment
to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2017, by and
among Covance Laboratories Inc., ChromaDex, Inc., ChromaDex
Analytics, Inc., and ChromaDex Corporation (incorporated by
reference to, and filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-37752) filed with the
Commission on November 9, 2017)
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37752)
filed with the Commission on March 15, 2018)
|
|
|
Certificate
of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-53290)
filed with the Commission on April 12, 2016)
|
|
Bylaws
of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to, and filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
(File No. 333-140056) filed with the Commission on June 24,
2008)
|
|
|
Amendment
to Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to, and
filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on
Form 8-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on July 19,
2016)
|
|
|
|
Form of
Stock Certificate representing shares of the Registrant’s
Common Stock (incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit
4.1 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No.
000-53290) filed with the Commission on April 3, 2009)
|
|
|
Investor’s
Rights Agreement, effective as of December 31, 2005, by and between
The University of Mississippi Research Foundation and ChromaDex
(incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 333-140056)
filed with the Commission on June 24, 2008)
|
|
|
Tag-Along
Agreement effective as of December 31, 2005, by and among the
Registrant, Frank Louis Jaksch, Snr. & Maria Jaksch, Trustees
of the Jaksch Family Trust, Margery Germain, Lauren Germain, Emily
Germain, Lucie Germain, Frank Louis Jaksch, Jr., and the University
of Mississippi Research Foundation (incorporated by reference to,
and filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report
on Form 8-K (File No. 333-140056) filed with the Commission on June
24, 2008)
|
|
|
Form of
Stock Certificate representing shares of the Registrant’s
Common Stock effective as of January 1, 2016 (incorporated by
reference to, and filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the
Commission on March 17, 2016)
|
|
|
Form of
Stock Certificate representing shares of the Registrant’s
Common Stock effective as of December 10, 2018 (incorporated by
reference to, and filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the
Commission on March 7, 2019)
|
|
Description
of Common Stock of the Registrant❖
|
|
|
Second
Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan effective March 13,
2007, as amended May 20, 2010 (incorporated by reference to, and
filed as Appendix B to the Registrant’s Current Definitive
Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (File No. 000-53290) filed with the
Commission on May 4, 2010)(1)+
|
|
|
Form of
Stock Option Agreement under the ChromaDex, Inc. Second Amended and
Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to,
and filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report
on Form 8-K (File No. 333-140056) filed with the Commission on June
24, 2008)(1)+
|
|
|
Form of
Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement under the ChromaDex, Inc. 2007
Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to, and filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
(File No. 333-140056) filed with the Commission on June 24,
2008)(1)+
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement dated April 19, 2010, by and
between Frank L. Jaksch, Jr. and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 22,
2010)(1)+
|
|
|
Amendment,
dated June 22, 2018, to the Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement, by and between Frank L. Jaksch Jr. and ChromaDex, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37752) filed
with the Commission on June 28, 2018)+
|
|
|
License
Agreement, dated March 25, 2010 between the University of
Mississippi and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to, and
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q (File No. 000-53290) filed with the Commission on May 18,
2010)*
|
|
|
First
Amendment to License Agreement, made as of June 3, 2011 between the
University of Mississippi and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-53290) filed with the
Commission on August 11, 2011)*
|
|
|
Restated
and Amended License Agreement, effective as of June 3, 2015 between
the University of Mississippi and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-53290) filed with the
Commission on August 13, 2015)*
|
|
|
License
Agreement, dated July 5, 2011 between ChromaDex, Inc. and Cornell
University (incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.1
to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No.
000-53290) filed with the Commission on November 10,
2011)*
|
|
|
Exclusive
License Agreement, dated September 8, 2011 between the Regents of
the University of California and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-53290) filed with the
Commission on November 10, 2011)*
|
|
|
First
Amendment to the License Agreement, effective as of September 5,
2014 between the Regents of the University of California and
ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File
No. 000-53290) filed with the Commission on November 6,
2014)*
|
|
|
Second
Amendment to the License Agreement, effective as of December 31,
2015, between the Regents of the University of California and
ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit
10.8 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File
No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on November 10,
2016)*
|
|
|
Exclusive
License Agreement, dated July 13, 2012 between Dartmouth College
and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to, and filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on November 10,
2016)
|
|
|
Exclusive
License Agreement, dated March 7, 2013 between Washington
University and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to, and
filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on
November 10, 2016)
|
|
|
Amendment
#1 to Exclusive License Agreement, effective as of December 15,
2015, between Washington University and ChromaDex, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No.
001-37752) filed with the Commission on November 10,
2016)
|
|
|
License
Agreement, made as of August 1, 2013, between Green Molecular S.L.,
Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to, and filed
as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on November 10,
2016)
|
|
|
Exclusive
License Agreement, effective as of May 16, 2014 between Dartmouth
College and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to, and
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q (File No. 000-53290) filed with the Commission on August
12, 2014)*
|
|
|
First
Amendment to Exclusive License Agreement, effective as of June 13,
2016, between Dartmouth College and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated
by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No.
001-37752) filed with the Commission on November 10,
2016)*
|
|
|
License
Agreement, effective as of October 15, 2014 between University of
Mississippi and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to, and
filed as Exhibit 10.40 to the Registrant’s Annual report on
Form 10-K (File No. 000-53290) filed with the Commission on March
19, 2015)*
|
|
|
First
Amendment to Exclusive License Agreement, effective as of July 6,
2015, between University of Mississippi and ChromaDex, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No.
001-37752) filed with the Commission on November 10,
2016)
|
|
|
Lease
Agreement, made as of April 14, 2016, by and between Longmont
Diagonal Investments LLC and ChromaDex Analytics, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-53290)
filed with the Commission on April 20, 2016)
|
|
|
Supply
Agreement, effective as of February 3, 2014, between Elysium
Health, Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to, and
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on May 12,
2016)*
|
|
|
Supply
Agreement, effective as of June 26, 2014, between Elysium Health,
Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to, and filed
as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on May 12,
2016)*
|
|
|
Amendment
to Supply Agreement, effective as of February 19, 2016, between
Elysium Health, Inc. and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to, and filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission
on May 12, 2016)*
|
|
|
Form of
Indemnity Agreement, between the Registrant and each of its
existing directors and executive officers. (incorporated by
reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the
Commission on December 16, 2016)+
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy
(incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No.
001-37752) filed with the Commission on August 9,
2018)+
|
|
|
Membership
Interest Purchase Agreement effective as of March 12, 2017, by and
among Robert Fried, Charles Brenner, Jeffrey Allen and the
Registrant (incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.1
to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No.
001-37752) filed with the Commission on May 11, 2017)
|
|
|
Form of
Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Robert Fried (incorporated by
reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-37752) filed with the
Commission on May 11, 2017)+
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated June 22, 2018,
by and between Robert Fried and the Registrant (incorporated by
reference to, and filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission
on June 28, 2018)+
|
|
|
ChromaDex
Corporation 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and Form of
Option Grant Notice, Form of Option Agreement, Form of Restricted
Stock Award Grant Notice, Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement,
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Grant Notice and Form of
Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement thereunder (incorporated by
reference to, and filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission
on June 28, 2018)+
|
|
|
Lease,
dated July 6, 2017, by and between 10900 WILSHIRE L.L.C and
ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit
10.50 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No.
001-37752) filed with the Commission on March 7, 2019)
|
|
|
First
Amendment to Lease, dated February 7, 2018, by and between 10900
WILSHIRE L.L.C and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to,
and filed as Exhibit 10.51 to the Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on March
7, 2019)
|
|
|
Second
Amendment to Lease, dated June 30, 2018, by and between 10900
WILSHIRE L.L.C and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to,
and filed as Exhibit 10.52 to the Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on March
7, 2019)
|
|
|
Third
Amendment to Lease, dated November 9, 2018, by and between 10900
WILSHIRE L.L.C and ChromaDex, Inc. (incorporated by reference to,
and filed as Exhibit 10.53 to the Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on March
7, 2019)
|
|
|
Executive
Employment Agreement, dated October 5, 2017, by and between Kevin
M. Farr and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to and filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K
(File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on October 10,
2017)+
|
|
|
Executive
Employment Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2018, by and between
Mark Friedman and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to and
filed as Exhibit 10.72 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on March 15,
2018)+
|
|
|
Executive
Employment Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2018, by and between Lisa
Bratkovich and the Registrant (incorporated by reference to, and
filed as Exhibit 10.58 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on March 7,
2019)+
|
|
|
Employment
Offer Letter, dated as of October 31, 2018, by ChromaDex, Inc. and
accepted by Matthew Roberts (incorporated by reference to, and
filed as Exhibit 10.61 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission on March 7,
2019)+
|
|
|
Supply
Agreement, dated December 19, 2018, by and between ChromaDex, Inc.
and Nestec Ltd. (incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit
10.62 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No.
001-37752) filed with the Commission on March 7,
2019)*
|
|
|
Note
Purchase Agreement, dated May 9, 2019, by and among ChromaDex
Corporation and Winsave Resource Limited and Pioneer Step Holdings
Limited (incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 99.1 to
the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No.
001-37752) filed with the Commission on May 10, 2019)
|
|
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated May 9, 2019, by and among ChromaDex
Corporation and Winsave Resource Limited and Pioneer Step Holdings
Limited (incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to
the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No.
001-37752) filed with the Commission on May 10, 2019)
|
|
|
Omnibus
Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement and Convertible Promissory
Notes, dated June 30, 2019, by and among ChromaDex Corporation and
Winsave Resource Limited and Pioneer Step Holdings Limited
(incorporated by reference to, and filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37752)
filed with the Commission on July 1, 2019)
|
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated August 13, 2019, by and among ChromaDex
Corporation and the purchasers therein (incorporated by reference
to, and filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission
on August 14, 2019)
|
|
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated August 15, 2019, by and among ChromaDex
Corporation and the purchasers therein (incorporated by reference
to, and filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-37752) filed with the Commission
on August 15, 2019)
|
|
Business
Financing Agreement, dated November 12, 2019, by and between
ChromaDex Corporation and Western Alliance
Bank❖
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
of ChromaDex Corporation❖
|
|
|
Consent
of Marcum, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm❖
|
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to §240.13a-14 or
§240.15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended❖
|
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to §240.13a-14 or
§240.15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended❖
|
|
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002)❖
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL
Instance Document
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
_________
❖
Filed
herewith.
(1)
Plan and related
Forms were assumed by ChromaDex Corporation pursuant to Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 21, 2008, among ChromaDex
Corporation (formerly Cody Resources, Inc.), CDI Acquisition, Inc.
and ChromaDex, Inc.
(2)
Schedules have been
omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. ChromaDex
Corporation undertakes to furnishsupplemental copies of any of the
omitted schedules upon request by the Securities and Exchange
Commission; provided,however, that ChromaDex Corporation may
request confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for any schedule so
furnished.
+
Indicates
management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement.
*
This Exhibit has
been granted confidential treatment and has been filed separately
with the Commission. The confidential portions of this Exhibit have
been omitted and are marked by an asterisk.
Item
16.
Form 10-K
Summary
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized, on the 10th day of March 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
CHROMADEX
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
ROBERT FRIED
|
|
|
Robert
Fried
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints Robert Fried and
Kevin Farr, and each of them, his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments
(including post-effective amendments) to this report, and to file
the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith,
as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them, or their or his
substitutes or substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
ROBERT FRIED
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Director
|
|
March
10, 2020
|
Robert
Fried
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
KEVIN FARR
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
March
10, 2020
|
Kevin
Farr
|
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
FRANK L. JAKSCH JR.
|
|
Executive
Chairman of the Board and Director
|
|
March
10, 2020
|
Frank
L. Jaksch Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
STEPHEN BLOCK
|
|
Director
|
|
March
10, 2020
|
Stephen
Block
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
JEFF BAXTER
|
|
Director
|
|
March
10, 2020
|
Jeff
Baxter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
KURT GUSTAFSON
|
|
Director
|
|
March
10, 2020
|
Kurt
Gustafson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
STEVEN RUBIN
|
|
Director
|
|
March
10, 2020
|
Steven
Rubin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
TONY LAU
|
|
Director
|
|
March
10, 2020
|
Tony
Lau
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
WENDY YU
|
|
Director
|
|
March
10, 2020
|
Wendy
Yu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-53-