CleanTech Biofuels, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2014 November (Form 10-Q)

clth_10q.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _______TO _________

Commission file number 333-145939

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	33-0754902
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

7386 Pershing Ave., University City, Missouri	63130
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(Registrant's telephone number): (314) 802-8670

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of November 3, 2014, 85,888,413 shares of the Company's common stock were outstanding.

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I	Financial Information

Item 1	Consolidated Financial Statements	3

	Consolidated Balance Sheets – September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013	3

	Consolidated Statements of Operations - Three and Nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and Inception to September 30, 2014	4

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) – September 30, 2014	5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and Inception to September 30, 2014	6

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7

Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17

Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	24

Item 4T	Controls and Procedures	24

PART II	Other Information

Item 1	Legal Proceedings	25

Item 1A	Risk Factors	25

Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	25

Item 3	Defaults upon Senior Securities	25

Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	25

Item 5	Other Information	25

Item 6	Exhibits	25

Signatures		27

Index to Exhibits		28

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.

(formerly Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	(unaudited)			(audited)
	September 30,			December 31,
	2014			2013
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	27,729		$	403
Prepaids and other current assets		38,879			41,451
		66,608			41,854

Property and equipment, net		-			-

Non-Current Assets:
Technology license		1,569,250			1,569,250
Patents		600,000			600,000
Total Assets	$	2,235,858		$	2,211,104

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	387,288		$	398,651
Accrued interest		516,478			380,817
Accrued payroll and professional fees		1,043,461			960,293
Notes payable		2,876,947			2,666,948
Total Current Liabilities		4,824,174			4,406,709

Notes Payable - Long-Term		-			100,000

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 authorized shares; no shares
issued or outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 240,000,000 authorized shares;
85,371,647 and 78,546,647 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		85,372			78,547
Additional paid-in capital		7,024,089			6,781,286
Notes receivable - restricted common stock		(138,146	)		(151,951	)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(9,559,631	)		(9,003,487	)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		(2,588,316	)		(2,295,605	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	$	2,235,858		$	2,211,104

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.

(formerly Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)

												July 14, 2004
	Three months ended					Nine months ended						(inception) to
	September 30,					September 30,						September 30,
	2014		2013			2014			2013			2014
General and administrative	$	102,081	$	99,600		$	333,638		$	291,186		$	4,409,254
Professional fees		21,080		23,275			77,361			79,398			1,604,348
Research and development		-		-			-			-			1,337,847
Operating Loss		123,161		122,875			410,999			370,584			7,351,449

Other expense (income):
Interest expense		50,444		46,594			146,340			132,272			2,209,667
Amortization of technology license		-		-			-			-			35,000
Deposit forfeiture		-		-			-			-			(25,000	)
Other income		-		-			-			-			(82,000	)
Interest income		3,002		(2,033	)		(1,195	)		(6,001	)		(63,833	)
		53,446		44,561			145,145			126,271			2,073,834

Income tax benefit		-		-			-			-			-

Net loss applicable to common stockholders	$	176,607	$	167,436		$	556,144		$	496,855		$	9,425,283


Basic and diluted net loss per common share		**		**		$	0.01		$	0.01		$	0.16
Weighted average common shares outstanding		85,221,647		73,153,314			82,637,758			72,708,869			59,176,105

** - less than $0.01

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.

(formerly Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY(DEFICIT) (unaudited)

							Additional			Notes Rec -			July 14, 2004
	Common Stock						Paid-in			restricted			(inception) to
	Shares			Amount			Capital			common stock			Sept 30, 2014
Balances at December 31, 2013		78,546,647		$	78,547		$	6,781,286		$	(151,951	)	$	(9,003,487	)

Interest on Notes Receivable		-			-			-			(6,249	)		-
Issuance of restricted shares to consultant in Jan. at $0.012/share		500,000			500			5,500			-			-
Issuance of restricted shares to investors in 2014 at $0.10/share		2,225,000			2,225			220,275			-			-
Issuance of restricted shares to certain board members and an
employee in April at $0.008 per share		4,250,000			4,250			29,750			-			-
Expiration of Note Receivable in Sep-14 at $0.10 per share		(150,000	)		(150	)		(14,850	)		20,054
Stock-based compensation		-			-			2,128			-			-
Net loss		-			-			-			-			(556,144	)
Balances at September 30, 2014		85,371,647		$	85,372		$	7,024,089		$	(138,146	)	$	(9,559,631	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.

(formerly Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

							July 14, 2004
	Nine months ended						(inception) to
	September 30,						September 30,
Operating Activities	2014			2013			2014
Net loss applicable to common stockholders	$	(556,144	)	$	(496,855	)	$	(9,425,283	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss applicable to common
stockholders to net cash used by operating activities:
Items that did not use (provide) cash:
Common stock issued for organizational costs		-			-			100
Depreciation		-			-			68,356
Amortization		-			-			35,000
Interest income		(1,195	)		(6,001	)		(36,446	)
Amortization of discounts (interest expense) and
other financing charges		-			-			1,284,106
Share-based compensation expense		2,128			5,644			802,510
Issuance of restricted common stock		40,000			-			103,000
Write-off of technology license		-			-			790,545
Fair value of RAM warrant settlement		-			-			125,027
Changes in operating assets and liabilities that provided
(used) cash, net:
Prepaids and other current assets		(2,091	)		(2,000	)		(10,291	)
Technology license		-			-			(132,500	)
Accounts payable		(11,363	)		(24,917	)		392,004
Other assets and other liabilities		145,660			131,564			862,041
Accrued liabilities		83,168			53,328			1,043,461
Net cash used by operating activities		(299,837	)		(339,237	)		(4,098,370	)

Cash Flows Provided (Used) by Investing Activities
Acquisition of patent, net		-			-			(150,000	)
Merger of Biomass North America Licensing, Inc., net		-			-			(20,000	)
Acquisition of HFTA technology, net		-			-			-
Expenditures for equipment		-			-			(54,237	)
Net cash used by investing activities		-			-			(224,237	)

Cash Flows Provided (Used) by Financing Activities
Advances - related parties		4,663			99			(28,588	)
Payments on capital lease, including interest		-			-			(13,903	)
Series A Convertible Debentures, including interest		-			-			1,424,900
Issuance of Note Payable		-			-			100,000
Issuance of Convertible Notes Payable		100,000			200,000			3,050,722
Payments on Note Payable		-			-			(636,295	)
Sale of common stock		222,500			100,000			453,500
Net cash provided by financing activities		327,163			300,099			4,350,336
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		27,326			(39,138	)		27,729
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		403			58,181			-
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	27,729		$	19,043		$	27,729

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.

(formerly Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS cont'd (unaudited)

					July 14, 2004
	Nine months ended				(inception) to
	September 30,				September 30,
	2014		2013		2014
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	681	$	708	$	25,315

Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and
financing activities:
Promissory notes receivable related to Series A Convertible Debentures	$	-	$	-	$	450,000
Capital lease related to the purchase of equipment	$	-	$	-	$	14,119
Common stock issued for organizational costs	$	-	$	-	$	100
Common stock issued to consultants, directors and former employee	$	40,000	$	-	$	103,000
Common stock issued for promissory notes	$	-	$	-	$	133,596
Common stock issued for Convertible notes converted	$	-	$	-	$	435,980
Common stock issued for Debentures converted	$	-	$	-	$	1,498,887
Common stock and note payable issued for acquistion of Biomass	$	-	$	-	$	1,569,250
Common stock issued for HFTA	$	-	$	-	$	693,045

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Note 1 – Organization and Business

Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), was incorporated in Delaware on December 20, 1996. Effective August 2, 2007, the Company changed its name to CleanTech Biofuels, Inc.

On March 27, 2007, the Company acquired SRS Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“SRS Energy”), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization. In accordance with the merger agreement, SRS Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, merged with and into SRS Energy. The merger was consummated on May 31, 2007 and resulted in SRS Energy becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. As a result of the merger, the stockholders of SRS Energy surrendered all of their issued and outstanding common stock and received shares of the Company’s common stock, $.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”). The former parent of SRS Energy, Supercritical Recovery Systems, Inc., immediately prior to the merger, distributed 78.8% of its 96% ownership in SRS Energy to its shareholders on a pro rata basis. For accounting purposes, because the Company had been a public shell company prior to the merger, the merger was treated as an acquisition of the Company and a recapitalization of SRS Energy.

The Company is a development stage company that has been engaged in technology development and pre-operational activities since its formation. The Company is currently seeking outside sources of funding to design and build a commercial biomass recovery plant to provide biomass feedstock for customer evaluation and trial purchases. Initially, the biomass feedstock output will be sold or provided to electric utilities, power and steam producers, and biofuel and chemical research firms for evaluation. In addition to research and development, the Company is also working towards licensing and/or developing potential commercial projects. These projects plan to focus on cleaning and separating municipal solid waste (also referred to as MSW) into its component parts in order to obtain: (i) a homogenous feedstock of cellulosic biomass for producing energy and other chemical products and (ii) recyclable products (metals, plastics, aluminum).

The Company has no operating history as a producer of biomass or energy sources and has not constructed any plants to date. We have no revenues and will be required to raise additional capital in order to execute our business plan and commercialize our products. Our current cash is not sufficient to fund our current operations. Our liabilities are substantially greater than our current available funds and current assets. Although we continue to seek additional financing through the sale of additional equity, various government funding opportunities and/or possibly through strategic alliances with larger energy or waste management companies, we have not had recent success securing meaningful amounts of financing. The Company will require substantial additional financing to implement its business plan and it may be unable to obtain the capital required to do so. If we are not able to immediately and successfully raise additional capital and/or achieve profitability or positive cash flow, we may not be able to continue operations.

The accompanying unaudited, consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Articles 8 and 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2014. For further information, refer to the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 21, 2014.

Note 2 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s ability to continue as a Going Concern.” This ASU provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements and requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. This new guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. We are currently assessing the impact the guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities (Topic 915) - Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation.” This ASU removes the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. This new guidance is effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014 and interim periods within those years. Early application is permitted.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” This ASU will supersede most of the existing revenue recognition requirements in U.S. GAAP and will require entities to recognize revenue at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring goods or services to a customer. The new standard also specifies new accounting for costs associated with obtaining or fulfilling contracts with customers and expands the required disclosures related to revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers. This new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period and can be adopted either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption, with early application not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact the pronouncement will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures and will apply this ASU upon commencement of revenues.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant, and Equipment - Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity”, which amends the definition of a discontinued operation by raising the threshold for a disposal to qualify as discontinued operations. This ASU will also require entities to provide additional disclosures about discontinued operations as well as disposal transactions that do not meet the discontinued operations criteria. This new guidance is effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014 and interim periods within those years. Beginning in 2015, we will apply the new guidance, as applicable, to future disposals of components or classifications as held for sale.

There were various other accounting standards updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or were applicable to specific industries, and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 3 – Mergers/Acquisitions

On September 15, 2008, the Company consummated the acquisition of Biomass North America Licensing, Inc. (“Biomass”) pursuant to a merger between Biomass and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (with Biomass as the surviving subsidiary of the Company) in accordance with an Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between the Company and Biomass. By virtue of the merger, the Company acquired a license agreement pursuant to which the Company holds a license in the United States and Canada to use patented technology licensed from Biomass North America, LLC, the former parent of Biomass (the “Licensor”), to clean and separate MSW (the “Biomass Recovery Process”). In July 2010, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued US patent number 7,745,208 for this process (the “BRP Patent”).

Upon consummation of the merger, the Company paid $20,000 in cash and issued a promissory note in the original principal amount of $80,000 bearing interest at an annual rate of 6% to a shareholder of the Licensor. This note has been paid in full. Additionally, the Company issued to the four shareholders of the Licensor a total of 1,895,000 shares of Common Stock and deposited an additional 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock into an escrow account (collectively, the “Shares”). The Shares were issued as part of the merger consideration received by the shareholders of the Licensor. In accordance with a November 2013 amendment, the Company has an exclusive license in the United States and Canada to use the Biomass Recovery Process and includes no performance requirements on the Company; the license agreement is for a term of 21 years from the date of the amendment or the life of any patent issued for the Biomass Recovery Process, including any amendments, modifications or extensions; the license requires that the Company pay a royalty in the amount of $2.00 per ton of MSW used in the Biomass Recovery Process to the Licensor; and the Company released the 4,000,000 shares of common stock to the Licensor previously held in escrow since the merger. The Company has recorded a long-term asset of approximately $1.6 million which it will begin to amortize upon utilizing the license in our operations.

Note 4 – Patent

The Company owns US Patent No. 6,306,248 (the “PSC Patent”), which is the underlying technology upon which the BRP Patent is based. The Company acquired the PSC Patent on October 22, 2008 pursuant to a Patent Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) with World Waste Technologies, Inc. (“WWT”). As part of the acquisition of the PSC Patent, we also became the licensor of such technology under the existing license agreement between Bio-Products International, Inc, the licensee (“Bio-Products”) and WWT. The Company has paid WWT $600,000 and issued warrants to purchase 1,800,000 shares of Common Stock at $0.10 per share and 500,000 shares of Common Stock at $0.11 per share. WWT assigned all of its rights, title and interest in the note, warrants, security agreement and purchase agreement to Vertex Energy, Inc. (“Vertex”) as a result of a merger in March 2009. The warrants had an exercisable term of five years which expired on October 22, 2014. The cost of the PSC Patent acquisition of $600,000 is recorded as a long-term asset on the Balance Sheet.

On September 1, 2010, the Company issued a promissory note to CMS Acquisition, LLC (“CMS”) in the amount of $100,000 and bearing interest at 6.0% per annum. The note is secured with a security interest in the PSC Patent. In connection with the financing, the Company issued a warrant to CMS to purchase 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a price of $0.05 per share. The warrant was exercisable at any time for five years from the date of issuance or re-issuance. The note was originally to mature on February 28, 2011. The Company and CMS have entered into various amendments extending the due date, the most recent of which was March 21, 2014, which extended the due date to March 1, 2015. As consideration in these amendments, the Company has: (i) paid $25,000 in February 2011 towards accrued interest to date and principal on the Note (ii) increased the interest rate to 10% as of May 15, 2011, (iii) re-dated the original warrants to March 21, 2014 and (iv) issued new warrants for 300,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.05 and exercisable at any time until March 21, 2019.

Note 5 - Technology Licenses

Biomass North America Licensing, Inc.

We own an exclusive license in the United States and Canada to use the Biomass Recovery Process (See Note 3 – Mergers/Acquisitions). We have recorded a long-term asset of approximately $1.6 million for the value of this license ($1.52 million when we acquired the license on September 15, 2008 and another $48,000 when we released the shares from escrow in November 2013 as described previously in Note 3). Amortization of this asset will begin upon commencement of the use of the Biomass Recovery Process.

In accordance with a November 2013 amendment, the Company has an exclusive license in the United States and Canada to use the Biomass Recovery Process and includes no performance requirements on the Company; the license agreement is for a term of 21 years from the date of the amendment or the life of any patent issued for the Biomass Recovery Process, including any amendments, modifications or extensions; the license requires that the Company pay a royalty in the amount of $2.00 per ton of MSW used in the Biomass Recovery Process to the Licensor.

Bio-Products International, Inc.

As disclosed in Note 4 - Patent, the Company acquired the PSC Patent in 2008 and as a result, became the licensor to Bio-Products for the PSC Patent pursuant to a Master License Agreement dated as of August 18, 2003 (the “PSC License Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the PSC License Agreement, Bio-Products (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Clean Earth Solutions, Inc., “CES”) is the exclusive licensee of the PSC Patent and has the right to sublicense the technology that is part of the PSC Patent (but not the BRP Patent) to any party. In addition, we are entitled to be paid 5% of any revenue derived by Bio-Products from the use of the technology and 40% of any sublicensing fees paid to Bio-Products for the use of the technology. The Master License Agreement is for a term of 20 years that commenced on August 18, 2003. On September 22, 2010, the Company sent a Notice of Breach to Bio-Products, which included removing the exclusivity of the license. We received a response from Bio-Products on November 5, 2010 disputing our claims. In February 2011, we became aware that Bio-Products effected a transfer of the license in violation of the PSC License Agreement. As a result, on March 21, 2011, we sent a notice of termination to Bio-Products and the transferee terminating the License Agreement. In June 2011, Steve Vande Vegte, a shareholder in CES, filed a lawsuit against various parties, including the Company. The only Cause of Action against the Company is for Declaratory Relief seeking to avoid our March 2011 termination of the license to which Mr. Vande Vegte is not a party. On August 5, 2011, the Company filed a demurrer requesting that the court dismiss the case on the grounds that Mr. Vande Vegte lacks standing to pursue a claim concerning the license and that the claim raised in the complaint is not ripe. The court granted our demurrer to dismiss Cleantech from this lawsuit on December 8, 2011.

All intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or other changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment charge is recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its implied fair value.

Note 6 – Debt

	September 30,			December 31,
	2014			2013

Convertible Notes Payable (2009 Offering), which are made up of various individual notes with an aggregate face value of $254,738 due in one year from date of note, interest at 6.0%	$	254,738		$	254,738

Convertible Notes Payable (11/10 Offering), which are made up of various individual notes with an aggregate face value of $1,861,003 and $1,851,004, as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, due in one year from date of note, interest at 6.0%		1,861,003			1,851,004

CMS Acquisition, LLC Note Payable, with a face value of $77,696 due on March 1, 2015, interest at 6.0% thru May 15,2011; 10.0% thereafter		77,696			77,696

Convertible Notes Payable (5/12 Offering), which is made up of various individual notes with a face value of $583,510 due in 18 months from date of note, interest at 6.0%		583,510			583,510

Convertible Notes Payable (2/14 Offering), which is made up of one note with a face value of $100,000 due in 18 months from date of note, interest at 6.0%		100,000			-
Total debt		2,876,947			2,766,948
Current maturities		(2,876,947	)		(2,666,948	)
Long-term portion, less current maturities	$	-		$	100,000

Convertible Notes Payable

Since September 2008, the Company has conducted five offerings of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant, and one offering of a convertible note (with no warrant), having the terms set forth below:

Offering	Note Interest Rate			Note Conversion Price		Warrant Exercise Price		Term	Closed or Open
2008 Offering		6.0	%	$	0.25	$	0.45	One-year	Closed
2009 Offering		6.0	%	$	0.08	$	0.30	One-year	Closed
6/10 Offering		12.0	%	$	0.08	$	0.30	One-year	Closed
11/10 Offering		6.0	%	$	0.06	$	0.30	One-year	Closed
5/12 Offering		6.0	%	$	0.10	$	0.35	18 months	Closed
2/14 Offering		6.0	%	$	0.10		n/a	18 months	Open

Each note holder retains the option of a cash repayment of the note plus interest, or the note can be converted at any time during the term of the note or prior to the closing of any Qualifying Equity Financing (minimum capital received of $5 million), into shares of Common Stock at the conversion price noted above. All notes have been recorded as debt (notes payable) in the financial statements, net of discounts for the conversion and warrant features (except for the 11/10, 5/12, and 2/14 Offerings which carried no discounts). See Subsequent Events footnote for further disclosure regarding our notes.

2008 Offering - During September 2008, the Company commenced an offering of units and raised a total of $642,000 of investment proceeds through March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2010, all of these notes had either been converted to shares of our common stock or exchanged into our 2009 Offering (resulting in new notes with a total face value of $539,829, which included the original principal and interest through the date of exchange).

2009 Offering - During April 2009, the Company commenced an offering of units and raised a total of $1,198,500 of investment proceeds through August 2010. One note was converted to shares of Common Stock in 2009 and one note was converted to shares of Common Stock in 2010. Beginning in March 2011, certain notes were exchanged into our 11/10 Offering. As a result, as of September 30, 2014, we had $254,738 face value of notes outstanding, which includes the exchanged notes from our 2008 Offering. All of these notes have matured. We will work with the remaining note holders to either: repay the notes, refinance to our 11/10 Offering or convert the notes to shares of Common Stock.

6/10 Offering - During June 2010, the Company commenced an offering of units and raised a total of $75,000 of investment proceeds in one note. Upon maturity in June 2011, this note was exchanged into our 11/10 Offering. As a result, the balance due on this offering is $-0-.

11/10 Offering - During November 2010, the Company commenced an offering of units and raised a total of $451,713 of investment proceeds. Three notes were converted to shares of Common Stock in 2011 and four notes were converted to shares of Common Stock in 2012. As of September 30, 2014, we had $1,861,003 face value of notes outstanding, which includes the exchanged notes from our 2009 Offering. As of September 30, 2014, approximately $1.7 million of these notes matured. We plan to work with each remaining note holder to exchange, convert or repay these notes.

5/12 Offering - During May 2012, the Company commenced an offering of units and, as of September 30, 2014, had raised a total of $583,510 of investment proceeds. As of September 30, 2014, approximately $380,000 of these notes matured. We plan to work with each remaining note holder to exchange, convert or repay these notes.

2/14 Offering - During February 2014, the Company commenced an offering of units and, as of September 30, 2014, had raised a total of $100,000 of investment proceeds.

CMS Acquisition, LLC Note Payable - In September 2010, the Company issued a note in the amount of $100,000 (interest at 6.0% per annum through May 15, 2011 and 10.0% thereafter, and secured by a security interest in the PSC Patent) and issued warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.05 per share. The note is due the earlier of: (i) March 1, 2015 pursuant to an amendment on March 21, 2014 or (ii) the date on which $500,000 or more in the aggregate is raised by the Company in future offerings. The warrants are exercisable at any time for five years from the date of issuance or reissuance. The value of these warrants was recorded as a contra-balance amount discount with the note and was fully amortized (interest expense) as of February 28, 2011 (the original due date). As consideration in various amendments, the Company has: (i) paid $25,000 in February 2011 towards accrued interest to date and principal on the Note (ii) increased the interest rate to 10% as of May 15, 2011, (iii) re-dated the original warrants to March 21, 2014 and (iv) issued new warrants for 300,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.05 and exercisable at any time until March 21, 2019.

The discounts on all notes payable have been amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of each note. All discounts were fully amortized and expensed as of June 30, 2011. The following is a summary of warrants issued and outstanding as of the dates below, at the exercise price and the amount of shares of Common Stock (these warrants have not been exercised or converted to shares of Common Stock).

	Exercise		As of September 30,		As of December 31,
Warrants issued to:	Price		2014		2013
Noteholders, 11/10 Offering	$	0.30		929,736		1,628,126
Noteholders, 5/12 Offering	$	0.35		952,885		1,667,170
Investors in Subscription Agreements (a)	$	0.15		9,855,000		6,180,000
CMS Acquistion LLC	$	0.05		2,300,000		2,150,000
Vertex Energy, Inc. (b)	$	0.11		1,800,000		1,800,000
Vertex Energy, Inc. (b)	$	0.10		500,000		500,000
				16,337,621		13,925,296

(a) Warrants issued to investors under these Subscription Agreements can be exercised within one or three years, depending on the Agreement. One-year warrants total 7,605,000 shares and three-year warrants total 2,250,000 shares.

(b) These warrants expired on October 22, 2014.

Note 7 - Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

In August 2013, the Company commenced an offering of units, under a Subscription Agreement, at a purchase price of $1,000 per unit (Equity Offering 8/13). Each unit consists of: (i) 10,000 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued restricted Common Stock and (ii) warrants to purchase 30,000 additional shares of Common Stock for a one or three year period from the date of issuance of the units at an initial exercise price of $0.15 per share. As of September 30, 2014, the Company issued 4,285,000 restricted shares (at $0.10 per share) of our Common Stock in exchange for $428,500 in investment in this offering.

In November 2013, the Company released 4,000,000 shares (at $0.012 per share) from escrow in accordance with the amended technology license previously disclosed.

In January 2014, the Company issued 500,000 restricted shares (at $0.012 per share) of our Common Stock per the consulting agreement with GWS Environmental Consultants. GWS has certain expertise and contacts in the collection, recycling, transfer, and disposal of MSW and will provide the Company consulting for a three-year period regarding these items.

In April 2014, the Board approved a grant to certain Board members and management for an aggregate of 4,250,000 shares of restricted common stock (at $0.008 per share). The Board granted these awards in recognition of the efforts of the recipients towards the furtherance and implementation of the Company’s strategic plan and to induce the recipients to continue those efforts on behalf of the Company. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined such grants were in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

In September 2014, a note receivable from a former director matured and was not paid. The note was originally issued in September 2009 to purchase shares of our common stock. As a result, 150,000 shares of restricted common stock, issued at $0.10 per share were forfeited and cancelled.

Net Loss per share – The Company calculates basic loss per share (“EPS”) and diluted EPS. EPS is computed as net loss divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS would reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options, warrants and other convertible securities. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had options, warrants and other convertible securities to purchase an aggregate of approximately 77 million and 71 million shares of our common stock, respectively, that were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share as their effects would have been anti-dilutive. Therefore, the Company only presents basic loss per share on the statement of operations.

Note 8 - Related Party Transactions

The Company has entered into stock purchase agreements with its executive officers and certain members of the Board of Directors (“Board”). The executive officers and directors issued notes to the Company in exchange for their stock purchases. These notes and accumulated interest are recorded as notes receivable in Stockholders’ Deficit.

In September 2013, the Company hired, on a part-time basis, a Chief Technology Officer (CTO) and a VP-Business Development (VP-BD). These individuals maintain their engineering firm Fenton Engineering International (FEI) on a full-time basis and receive no salary in their part-time positions but are eligible for grants of stock options. We have used and continue to use their services. As of September 30, 2014, all amounts have been paid to FEI except for approximately $51,000.

Two members of our current Board, James Russell and David Bransby are parties in investments made in our convertible note offerings. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the aggregate amount of these investments, including interest, is approximately $549,000 and $426,000, respectively.

The Company had engaged the law firm of Sauerwein, Simon and Hein (“SSH”) related to various issues including our reverse merger, our SB-2 registration statement, litigation matters and general business activity. A member of our Board is a partner of SSH. We no longer use SSH as legal counsel. As of September 30, 2014, all amounts have been paid to SSH except for approximately $90,000.

Beginning in 2009, the Company has provided advances to two employees – Ed Hennessey and Mike Kime. Mr. Kime resigned from his positions with the Company effective June 21, 2010. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the aggregate balances of advances totaled approximately $29,000 and $33,000, respectively. The balances are included in Prepaids and Other Current Assets on the Balance Sheet.

Note 9 – Share-based Payments

The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards including stock options and restricted stock issued to employees, directors and consultants and is measured at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. The Company has no awards with market or performance conditions.

In March 2007, the Company assumed and adopted the 2007 Stock Option Plan (“Stock Plan”) for its employees, directors and consultants, which includes an equity compensation plan for non-employee directors pursuant to which stock options and shares of restricted stock may be granted. The Company currently has reserved a maximum of 14,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued for stock options or restricted shares awarded under the Stock Plan.

In March 2013, the Company granted options under the Stock Plan to purchase an aggregate of 750,000 shares of Common Stock to an employee in which one-third vested immediately and the remaining options vest ratably in August 2013 and August 2014, with an exercise price of $0.02. As of September 30, 2014, none of these options were cancelled or expired and all shares of these options were vested.

In September 2013, the Company granted options under the Stock Plan to purchase an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock to two part-time employees (newly hired CTO and VP–BD) in which one-third will vest ratably beginning in September 2014, with an exercise price of $0.10. As of September 30, 2014, none of these options were cancelled or expired and 333,334 shares of these options were vested.

The following table provides a summary of the Company's share-based expense:

	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	Sept 30, 2014		Sept 30, 2013		Sept 30, 2014		Sept 30, 2013
Pre-tax compensation expense:
Stock options	$	503	$	1,580	$	2,128	$	5,644
Warrants		-		-		-		-
Total expense		503		1,580		2,128		5,644
Tax benefit, net		-		-		-		-
After-tax compensation expense	$	503	$	1,580	$	2,128	$	5,644

The potential tax benefit realizable for the anticipated tax deductions of the exercise of share-based payment arrangements totaled approximately $312,000 and $311,000 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. However, due to the uncertainty that the tax benefits will be realized, these potential benefits were not recognized currently. As of September 30, 2014, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to all current share-based payment arrangements.

A summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information is set forth in the following table:

	Shares Under Option		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Aggregate intrinsic value
Options outstanding at December 31, 2013		11,947,000	$	0.10		(1	)

Granted		-
Exercised		-
Forfeited		-
Options outstanding at September 30, 2014		11,947,000	$	0.10		(1	)

Options exercisable at September 30, 2014		11,280,333	$	0.10		(1	)

Unvested Options at September 30, 2014		666,667	$	0.10		(1	)

(1) The weighted-average exercise price at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 for all outstanding and exercisable options was greater than the fair value of the Company's common stock on that date, resulting in an aggregate intrinsic value of $-0-.

The following table summarizes information about the Company's issuances of restricted stock under the Stock Plan:

	Restricted Shares Issued			Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance as of December 31, 2013		1,470,000		$	0.09

Granted		-
Exercised		-
Forfeited		(150,000	)		0.10
Balance as of September 30, 2014		1,320,000		$	0.08

Restricted stock vested at September 30, 2014		1,320,000		$	0.08

Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

Lease – The Company leases approximately 1,800 square feet of office space for use as our corporate office, located at 7386 Pershing Ave. in St. Louis, Missouri. The original lease term expired and can be extended for two year periods at expiring terms and conditions (current term ends December 2014). Our monthly rent under the lease is $1,800 plus the cost of utilities.

Contingencies

The Company currently has no open litigation and/or claims.

Note 11 – Subsequent Events

In August 2013, the Company commenced an offering of units, under a Subscription Agreement, at a purchase price of $1,000 per unit (Equity Offering 8/13). Each unit consists of: (i) 10,000 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued restricted Common Stock and (ii) warrants to purchase 30,000 additional shares of Common Stock for a one or three year period from the date of issuance of the units at an initial exercise price of $0.15 per share. As of November 3, 2014, the Company has issued 4,285,000 restricted shares of our Common Stock in exchange for $428,500 in investment in this offering.

In February 2014, the Company commenced a convertible note payable offering (our 2/14 Offering). As of November 3, 2014, the Company has raised $100,000 of investment proceeds.

In October 2014, we entered into a nonbinding Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with various parties (combined, the “Parties”) which memorializes the Parties’ intent for Cleantech to develop and operate a Municipal Solid Waste transfer station and biomass recovery plant on land in Jersey City, NJ not owned by Cleantech. All Parties agree to work towards Definitive Agreements, as soon as reasonably practicable, including but not limited to: an escrow agreement whereby CleanTech would fund engineering and legal expenses incurred during the permitting application process, an option agreement providing CleanTech the right to purchase the permit applicant, a lease agreement for a period of not less than 20 years, including two 5 year options to extend the term of the lease to 30 years, and non-compete agreements from the parties. This MOU will terminate upon the earlier of: (i) execution of the Definitive Agreements, (ii) mutual agreement between the Parties, and (iii) 5 PM (EST) on June 29, 2015.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

From time to time, we make written or oral statements that are “forward-looking,” including statements contained in this report and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in our reports to stockholders. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, provide a safe harbor for such forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included herein regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, future revenues, projected costs, prospects, plans, objectives and other future events and circumstances are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,” “would,” “should” and similar expressions or negative expressions of these terms. Such statements are only predictions and, accordingly, are subject to substantial risks, uncertainties and assumptions.

Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We caution you that any forward-looking statement reflects only our belief at the time the statement is made. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee our future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Refer to our Risk Factors section of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on March 21, 2014, for a full description of factors we believe could cause actual results or events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. These factors include:

	●	our ability to raise additional capital on favorable terms,
	●	our ability to continue operating and to implement our business plan;
	●	the commercial viability of our technologies,
	●	our ability to maintain and enforce our exclusive rights to our technologies,
	●	the demand for and production costs of various energy products made from our biomass,
	●	competition from other alternative energy technologies, and
	●	other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our filings with the SEC.

Although we believe the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it is not possible to foresee or identify all factors that could have a material and negative impact on our future performance. The forward-looking statements in this report are made on the basis of management’s assumptions and analyses as of the time the statements are made, in light of their experience and perception of historical conditions, expected future developments and other factors believed to be appropriate under the circumstances.

Company Overview

The following discussion of our Company Overview, Recent Developments and Plan of Operation should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes to the financial statements included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that relate to future events or our future financial performance. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity or performance to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity or performance. These risks and other factors include, among others, those listed under “Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information.”

We are a development stage company focused on being a provider of: (i) cellulosic biomass derived from municipal solid waste, also known as MSW, as a feedstock for producing energy and other chemical products and (ii) recyclables (metals, plastics, glass) from the MSW. We are the exclusive licensee in the United States and Canada of patented technology, which we refer to as our Biomass Recovery Process that cleans and separates MSW and generates a clean, homogeneous biomass feedstock that we believe can be converted into various energy products. Our license permits us to use the biomass we derive from MSW to produce all energy products. In addition, we own the patent for a pressurized steam classification technology originally developed by the University of Alabama Huntsville that we refer to as our PSC technology. The PSC technology is the underlying technology upon which the Biomass Recovery Process is based. Prior to March 2011, we had licensed the PSC technology to Bio-Products International, Inc. (“Bio-Products”). However, pursuant to a settlement agreement with Bio-Products in March 2009, we had the right to use the Biomass Recovery Process technology worldwide, for any product that we desired and with no royalty due to Bio-Products. We terminated the license to Bio-Products in March 2011.

We are a Delaware corporation. We were originally incorporated in 1996 as Long Road Entertainment, Inc., and were formed to operate as a holding company for businesses in the theater, motion picture and entertainment industries. We ceased conducting that business in 2005 and were dormant until the fall of 2006, at which time our founder and then controlling stockholder decided to pursue the sale of the company. In anticipation of that sale, we changed our name to Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc.

On March 27, 2007, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization in which we agreed to acquire SRS Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation that at that time was seeking to commercialize various technologies for the processing of waste materials into usable products. We consummated the merger on May 31, 2007 resulting in SRS Energy becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary. Effective August 2, 2007, we changed our name to CleanTech Biofuels, Inc.

We have no operating history as a producer of biomass feedstocks or any energy products and have not constructed any operating plants to date. We have not earned any revenues to date and our current capital and other existing resources are not sufficient to fund the implementation of our business plan or our required working capital. We will require substantial additional capital to implement our business plan and we may be unable to immediately obtain the capital required to continue operating.

Recent Developments

In October 2014, we entered into a nonbinding Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with various parties (combined, the “Parties”) which memorializes the Parties’ intent for Cleantech to develop and operate a MSW transfer station and biomass recovery plant on land in Jersey City, NJ not owned by Cleantech. All Parties agree to work towards Definitive Agreements, as soon as reasonably practicable, including but not limited to: an escrow agreement whereby CleanTech would fund engineering and legal expenses incurred during the permitting application process, an option agreement providing CleanTech the right to purchase the permit applicant, a lease agreement for a period of not less than 20 years, including two 5 year options to extend the term of the lease to 30 years, and non-compete agreements from the parties. This MOU will terminate upon the earlier of: (i) execution of the Definitive Agreements, (ii) mutual agreement between the Parties, and (iii) 5 PM (EST) on June 29, 2015.

In January 2014, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with GWS Environmental Consultants. GWS has certain expertise and contacts in the collection, recycling, transfer, and disposal of MSW and will provide the Company consulting for a three-year period regarding these items.

In February 2013, the Company and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to work cooperatively in the development of joint waste-to-energy and micro-grid projects. In September 2013, SAIC has changed its’ name to Leidos Holdings, Inc. (Leidos). We plan to establish systems consisting of the Company’s Biomass Recovery Process and Leidos-sponsored alternative energy systems that use the Company’s biomass to produce electricity and steam or biofuels that use Leidos’ micro-grid technologies. Leidos provides engineering services, project management and design, and experience in waste to energy technologies, building combined heat and power facilities, and environmental assessments and permitting.

In August 2013, the Company commenced an offering of units, under a Subscription Agreement, at a purchase price of $1,000 per unit (Equity Offering 8/13). Each unit consists of: (i) 10,000 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued restricted common stock, par value $0.001 (“Common Stock”) and (ii) warrants to purchase 30,000 additional shares of Common Stock for a one or three year period from the date of issuance of the units at an initial exercise price of $0.15 per share. As of November 3, 2014, the Company has issued 4,285,000 restricted shares of our Common Stock in exchange for $428,500 in investment in this offering.

All of the promissory notes in our 2009 Offering and certain notes in our 11/10 and 5/12 Offerings are now due. As of November 3, 2014, approximately $2.8 million is currently due, including interest. We will work with each remaining note holder to exchange, or convert, these promissory notes. There can be no assurance that we will reach agreements with any or all of these note holders and we may be required to repay such amounts.

In November 2013, the Company entered into an Amended Technology License and Joint Development Agreement with its’ licensor, Biomass North America LLC (the “Amended Agreement”). Under the terms of the Amended Agreement, the Company retains the exclusive license to the licensed technology in the United States and Canada, while eliminating any performance requirements for a commercial development. The term is for 21 years or the date of expiration of the last of the technology patents, including any extensions, modifications or amendments. Additionally, the royalty to be paid by the Company to the licensor will be $2.00 per ton of MSW with no royalty due if the MSW is used for research and development. The 4,000,000 shares previously held in escrow were released to the licensor and the Company recorded a $48,000 addition to our Technology License asset related to these shares.

Plan of Operation

Our focus is to secure sufficient capital to fund our current working capital requirements and the construction of a commercial plant as described further in this section. We currently do not have sufficient capital to continue to fund our proposed operations, and are relying on the minimal assets on hand to fund our limited operations and corporate existence. All of our on-going and proposed developments/projects require a significant amount of capital that we currently do not have. While we continue to aggressively pursue outside sources of funding, we have not had recent success securing meaningful amounts of financing. As a result, we can provide no assurance that we will secure any source of funding in the immediate time frame required and the failure to do so will likely result in an inability to continue operations.

Our company was initially conceived as a fully-integrated producer of cellulosic ethanol from MSW. Based on our investigation and acquisition of new technologies and research and development of our existing technologies in 2008, we re-focused our business to the commercialization of our Biomass Recovery Process technology for cleaning and separating MSW into its component parts and initiated a plan to consolidate the ownership and/or rights to use intellectual property around this technology. The technology is currently in commercial use in Coffs Harbor, Australia by an operator not affiliated with the Company (the “Third-Party Operator”). As a result, we believe this technology is ready for commercial implementation in the United States and elsewhere. In furtherance of our new focus, we are currently seeking an outside source of financing to design and build a commercial biomass recovery plant to provide biomass feedstock for customer evaluation and trial purchases. Initially, the biomass feedstock output is expected to be sold or provided to electric utilities, power and steam producers, and biofuel research firms for evaluation. In addition to seeking a source of funding for plant development, the Company is also working towards licensing and/or developing potential commercial projects as they present themselves. All of our developments plan to focus on cleaning and separating MSW into its component parts in order to obtain: (i) a homogenous feedstock of cellulosic biomass for producing energy and other chemical products and (ii) recyclable products (metals, plastics).

Biomass Feedstock Production

The Company plans to design and build a commercial biomass recovery plant to provide biomass feedstock for customer evaluation and trial purchases. Initially, the biomass feedstock output is expected to be sold or provided to electric utilities, power and steam producers, and biofuel and chemical research firms for evaluation. In addition to research and development, the Company is also working towards licensing and/or developing potential commercial projects.

We are also seeking to develop a plant in a major metropolitan area. We are working to develop one or more locations where waste collected would be processed using our technology and the biomass produced used to create heat and/or power.

In addition to the developments we are currently contemplating, other development opportunities are presented to us and we evaluate those potential developments. Upon operating a plant and after refining our know-how with respect to implementation of the technology, we intend to seek to partner with waste haulers, landfill owners and municipalities to implement the technology across the United States and internationally.

The further development of commercial plants and/or implementation of the licensing of our technology described above will require significant additional capital, which we currently do not have. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to raise this additional capital. While we anticipate that financing for the commercial biomass recovery plant and these other potential projects could also be provided in part via tax exempt bond financing or through the use of loan guarantees from local, state and federal authorities, we have not secured any such financing and there can be no assurance that we will be able to secure any such financing.

Bio-Fuel and Bio-Chemical Joint Testing/Research

After we are able to process MSW into biomass through our potential future biomass recovery plant and/or in future commercial vessels, we plan to enter into joint research agreements with companies looking to process biomass in their system(s) for various types of energy and chemical production. We anticipate that this testing and research will provide possible revenue streams, projects and additional opportunities for use of our biomass.

In February 2012, we entered into a Confidentiality Agreement and Material Transfer Agreement with Sweetwater Energy, Inc. (“Sweetwater”), a renewable energy company with patent-pending technology to produce sugars from several types of biomass for use in the biofuel, biochemical and bioplastics markets. We agreed and coordinated with the Third-Party Operator in Australia to ship 10 pounds of biomass produced at the Third-Party Operator’s facility to the Sweetwater lab for testing. The shipment arrived in May 2012 and Sweetwater has completed their initial testing. In June 2011, we entered into a Confidential Disclosure and Sampling Agreement with Novozymes North America, Inc., a developer of industrial enzymes, microorganisms, and biopharmaceutical ingredients for conversion into a variety of energy and chemical products. In July 2011, we supplied a sample of our biomass product for testing in their enzymatic hydrolysis process. Some initial testing was completed during the 3rd Quarter of 2011. We expect further testing to occur for both of these companies and for possible additional companies upon securing the requisite financing to build a biomass recovery plant to process MSW.

New Technologies; Commercializing Existing Technologies

Because of what we believe to be our unique ability to produce a clean, homogenous biomass feedstock, we are frequently presented with the opportunity to partner with or acquire new technologies. In addition to developing our current technologies, we intend to continue to add technologies to our suite of solutions that complement our core operations. We believe that our current technologies and aspects of those in development will enable us to eventually expand our business to use organic material from other waste streams such as municipal bio-solids from waste water facilities and animal waste for fuel production.

To commercialize our technology, we intend to:

●	construct and operate a commercial plant that: (i) processes MSW into cellulosic biomass for conversion into energy or chemical products and (ii) separates recyclables (metals, plastics, glass) for single-stream recycling;

●	identify and partner with landfill owners, waste haulers and municipalities to identify locations suitable for our technology; and

●	pursue additional opportunities to implement our technology in commercial settings at transfer stations and landfills in our licensed territories.

Our ability to implement this strategy will depend on our ability to raise significant amounts of additional capital and to hire appropriate managers and staff. Our success will also depend on a variety of market forces and other developments beyond our control.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the amounts of expenses and changes in our consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:

	Three months ended September 30,
	2014		2013			Change
General and administrative	$	102,081	$	99,600		$	2,481
Professional fees		21,080		23,275			(2,195	)
Operating loss		123,161		122,875			286

Other expense (income):
Interest expense		50,444		46,594			3,850
Interest income		3,002		(2,033	)		5,035

Net Loss	$	176,607	$	167,436		$	9,171

Interest Expense – The increase in 2014 is due primarily to issuing an additional convertible note in 2014.

Interest Income – A note receivable to purchase shares of our common stock, originally issued in September 2009, matured in September 2014 and was not paid. As a result, the accrued interest income of approximately $5,000 and the note were written-off and the shares were forfeited and cancelled.

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2014			2013			Change
General and administrative	$	333,638		$	291,186		$	42,452
Professional fees		77,361			79,398			(2,037	)
Operating loss		410,999			370,584			40,415

Other expense (income):
Interest expense		146,340			132,272			14,068
Interest income		(1,195	)		(6,001	)		4,806

Net Loss	$	556,144		$	496,855		$	59,289

General and Administrative – The increase in 2014 is due to the share value for shares of common stock issued to certain board members and management in the second quarter of 2014 and increased travel expenses.

Interest Expense – The increase in 2014 is due to issuing additional convertible notes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As a development-stage company, we have no revenues and will be required to raise additional capital in order to execute our business plan and commercialize our products. Beginning in September 2008 and as of November 3, 2014, we raised an aggregate of: (i) approximately $3.15 million in separate offerings of units comprised of a convertible note and warrants and (ii) $428,500 in an equity offering of Common Stock. We are continuing to explore opportunities to raise cash through the issuance of these units and other financing opportunities. As of November 3, 2014, our current cash and other assets are not sufficient to fund our operations. As of September 30, 2014, we had a significant working capital deficit. Our liabilities are substantially greater than our current assets. Our only significant assets are our intellectual property rights, which are intangible and not readily convertible into liquid assets.

We are attempting to identify one or more potential sources of additional financing, such as through the sale of additional equity, various government funding opportunities and/or possibly through strategic alliances with larger energy or waste management companies. The Company will continue to explore and evaluate financing alternatives and/or other transactions, including potentially retaining a financial advisor. However, we may not be successful in securing additional financing. If we are not able to obtain additional financing in the immediate future, we will be required to delay our development until such financing becomes available. Further, even assuming that we secure additional funds, we may never achieve profitability or positive cash flow. If we are not able to timely and successfully raise additional capital and/or achieve profitability or positive cash flow, we will not have sufficient capital resources to implement our business plan or to continue our operations.

Debt

Convertible Notes Payable

Offering	Note Interest Rate			Note Conversion Price		Warrant Exercise Price		Term	Closed or Open
2008 Offering		6.0	%	$	0.25	$	0.45	One-year	Closed
2009 Offering		6.0	%	$	0.08	$	0.30	One-year	Closed
6/10 Offering		12.0	%	$	0.08	$	0.30	One-year	Closed
11/10 Offering		6.0	%	$	0.06	$	0.30	One-year	Closed
5/12 Offering		6.0	%	$	0.10	$	0.35	18 months	Closed
2/14 Offering		6.0	%	$	0.10		n/a	18 months	Open

Each note holder retains the option of cash repayment of the note plus interest, or can convert the note at any time during the term of the note or prior to the closing of any Qualifying Equity Financing (minimum capital received of $5 million) into shares of Common Stock at the conversion price noted above. All notes have been recorded as debt (notes payable) in the financial statements, net of discounts for the conversion and warrant features (except for the 11/10, 5/12, and 2/14 Offerings which carried no discounts). The discounts have been amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of each note and were fully amortized as of December 31, 2011.

2009 Offering - During April 2009, the Company commenced an offering of units and raised a total of $1,198,500 of investment proceeds through August 2010. One note was converted to shares of Common Stock in 2009 and one note was converted to shares of Common Stock in 2010. Beginning in March 2011, certain notes were exchanged into our 11/10 Offering. As a result, as of September 30, 2014, we had $254,738 face value of notes outstanding, which includes the exchanged notes from our 2008 Offering. All of these notes have matured. We will work with the remaining noteholders to either: repay the notes, refinance to our 11/10 Offering or convert the notes to shares of Common Stock.

2/14 Offering - During February 2014, the Company commenced an offering of units and, as of September 30, 2014, had raised a total of $100,000 of investment proceeds and have $100,000 face value of notes outstanding.

CMS Acquisition, LLC Note Payable

In September 2010, the Company issued a note in the amount of $100,000 (interest at 6.0% per annum through May 15, 2011 and 10.0% thereafter and secured by a security interest in the PSC Patent) and issued warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.05 per share. The note is due the earlier of: (i) March 1, 2015 (extended from February 28, 2011 through various amendments) or (ii) the date on which $500,000 or more in the aggregate is raised by the Company in future offerings. The warrants are exercisable at any time for five years from the date of issuance or reissuance. The value of these warrants has been recorded as a contra-balance amount discount with the note and was amortized (interest expense) through the original due date of February 28, 2011. As consideration in these amendments, the Company has: (i) paid $25,000 in February 2011 towards accrued interest to date and principal on the Note (ii) increased the interest rate to 10% as of May 15, 2011, (iii) re-dated the original warrants to March 21, 2014 and (iv) issued new warrants for 300,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.05 and exercisable at any time until March 21, 2019. As of September 30, 2014, $77,696 face value of this note is outstanding.

Summary of Cash Flow Activity

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2014			2013
Net cash used by operating activities	$	(299,837	)	$	(339,237	)
Net cash used by investing activities		-			-
Net cash provided by financing activities		327,163			300,099

Net cash used by operating activities

During the nine months ended September, 2014 and 2013, cash used by operating activities was impacted primarily by increases in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities.

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to the issuance of a note payable for investment and the sale of common stock for investments. Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily due to the issuance of a notes payable for investment.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

In the table below, we set forth our obligations as of September 30, 2014. Some of the figures we include in this table are based on our estimates and assumptions about these obligations, including their durations, anticipated actions by third parties and other factors. The obligations we may pay in future periods may vary from those reflected in this table because of estimates or actions of third parties as disclosed in the notes to the table.

	Payments due by Period
	Total		Less than 1 year		1 to 3 years		4 to 5 years		More than 5 years
Convertible Notes (1)	$	3,286,000	$	3,286,000	$	-	$	-	$	-
CMS Acquisition Note (2)		105,000		105,000		-		-		-
Operating Lease (3)		5,000		5,000		-		-		-
Total contractual obligations	$	3,396,000	$	3,396,000	$	-	$	-	$	-

(1) Amount represents value of principal amount of notes and estimates for interest. These notes are with various individuals, carry one-year or 18-month terms and are convertible into shares of Common Stock at the noteholders option. The first of these notes matured in April 2010. We are working with the noteholders to refinance their notes, convert their notes into shares of Common Stock or repay the notes.

(2) Amount represents value of principal amount of note and interest and is secured by a security interest in the PSC Patent. This note is due March 1, 2015.

(3) The lease for our office space through December 2014.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Certain accounting issues require management estimates and judgments for the preparation of financial statements. Our management periodically evaluates the estimates and judgments made. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates as a result of different assumptions or conditions.

We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments relating to long-lived assets, convertible notes and warrants, fair-value measurement, share-based compensation and income tax matters have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements. Therefore, we consider these to be our critical accounting estimates. Our critical accounting policies and estimates are more fully described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2014. Our critical accounting policies and estimate assumptions have not changed during the three months ended September 30, 2014.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Not applicable.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures – We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Security and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will necessarily prevent all fraud and material error. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the objectives outlined above. Based on their most recent evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective at that reasonable assurance level at September 30, 2014. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, including, but not limited to having two full-time employees (chief executive officer and chief financial officer), and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – During the three months ended September 30, 2014, there were no material changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings - None

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. These cautionary statements are to be used as a reference in connection with any forward-looking statements. The factors, risks and uncertainties identified in these cautionary statements are in addition to those contained in any other cautionary statements, written or oral, which may be made or otherwise addressed in connection with a forward-looking statement or contained in any of our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In August 2013, the Company commenced an offering of units, under a Subscription Agreement, at a purchase price of $1,000 per unit (Equity Offering 8/13). Each unit consists of: (i) 10,000 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued restricted Common Stock and (ii) warrants to purchase 30,000 additional shares of Common Stock for a one or three year period from the date of issuance of the units at an initial exercise price of $0.15 per share. As of September 30, 2014, the Company raised a total of $428,500 of investment proceeds. The issuance of units and the issuance of Common Stock were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), pursuant to Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act (“Rule 506”) and/or Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

During February 2014 (2/14 Offering), the Company commenced an offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note. As of September 30, 2014, the Company raised a total of $100,000 of investment proceeds. Each convertible promissory note carries an 18-month term and a 6% interest rate. In addition, each note can be converted into shares of the Company’s Common Stock, at $0.10 per share at the holder’s option. The issuance of units and the issuance of Common Stock upon conversion of notes were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, pursuant to Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act (“Rule 506”) and/or Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Certain promissory notes in our offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant, commenced in April 2009 (2009 Offering, 11/10 Offering, and 5/12 Offering) are due. As of September 30, 2014, approximately $2.8 million (including approximately $463,000 of accrued interest) was due and payable. We plan to work with each remaining note holder to exchange, or convert, these promissory notes. There can be no assurance that we will reach agreements with any or all of these note holders and we may be required to repay such amounts.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures – Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information - None

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this Report.

EXHIBIT NO.		DESCRIPTION

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

32.1		Certification (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of Chief Executive Officer.

32.2		Certification (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of Principal Financial Officer.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.

November 5, 2014	By:	/s/ Edward P. Hennessey, Jr.
		Edward P. Hennessey, Jr.
		Chief Executive Officer

November 5, 2014	By:	/s/ Thomas Jennewein
		Thomas Jennewein
		Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT NO.		DESCRIPTION

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.

32.1		Certification (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of Chief Executive Officer.

32.2		Certification (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of Principal Financial Officer.