Clearday, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2011 April (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended April 2, 2011
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-21074
SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in our charter)
Delaware | 77-0158076 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
460 Ward Drive,
Santa Barbara, California 93111-2356
(Address of principal executive offices & zip code)
Santa Barbara, California 93111-2356
(Address of principal executive offices & zip code)
(805) 690-4500
(Registrants telephone number including area code)
(Registrants telephone number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o | Accelerated Filer o | Non-Accelerated Filer o | Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o or No þ
We had 33,023,687 shares of our common stock outstanding as of the close of business on May 1,
2011.
SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
Three Months Ended April 2, 2011
1 | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 |
i
Table of Contents
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. We claim the protection of the safe harbor contained in the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 for these forward looking statements. Our forward-looking statements relate to
future events or our future performance and include, but are not limited to, statements concerning
our business strategy, future commercial revenues, market growth, capital requirements, new product
introductions, expansion plans and the adequacy of our funding. Other statements contained in this
Report that are not historical facts are also forward-looking statements. We have tried, wherever
possible, to identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, could,
should, expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates and other
comparable terminology.
We caution investors that any forward-looking statements presented in this Report, or that we
may make orally or in writing from time to time, are based on the beliefs of, assumptions made by,
and information currently available to, us. Such statements are based on assumptions and the
actual outcome will be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties and factors that
are beyond our control or ability to predict. Although we believe that our assumptions are
reasonable, they are not guarantees of future performance and some will inevitably prove to be
incorrect. As a result, our actual future results can be expected to differ from our expectations,
and those differences may be material. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past
forward-looking statements, which are based on known results and trends at the time they are made,
to anticipate future results or trends.
Some of the risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements
include the following:
| limited cash and a history of losses; |
| the current worldwide recession; |
| our need to raise additional capital for our business; |
| limited number of potential customers; |
| rapidly advancing technology in our target markets; |
| our need to overcome additional technical challenges necessary to develop and commercialize HTS wire; |
| the impact of competitive products, technologies and pricing; |
| limited number of suppliers for some of our components; |
| no significant backlog from quarter to quarter; |
| fluctuations in sales and product demand from quarter to quarter can be significant; |
| our proprietary rights, while important to our business, are difficult and costly to protect; |
| manufacturing capacity constraints and difficulties; and |
| cost and uncertainty from compliance with environmental regulations. |
For further discussion of these and other factors see, Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for 2010.
This Report and all subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us
or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary
statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release
publicly any revisions to our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after
the date of this Report.
1
Table of Contents
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements. |
SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
April 2, 2011 | April 3, 2010 | |||||||
Net revenues: |
||||||||
Commercial product revenues |
$ | 1,603,000 | $ | 2,334,000 | ||||
Government and other contract revenues |
17,000 | 1,081,000 | ||||||
Total net revenues |
1,620,000 | 3,415,000 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||
Cost of commercial product revenues |
1,669,000 | 2,386,000 | ||||||
Cost of government and other contract revenue |
15,000 | 774,000 | ||||||
Research and development |
1,988,000 | 1,010,000 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
1,656,000 | 1,783,000 | ||||||
Total costs and expenses |
5,328,000 | 5,953,000 | ||||||
Loss from operations |
(3,708,000 | ) | (2,538,000 | ) | ||||
Other Income and Expense |
||||||||
Adjustments to fair value of derivatives |
| 42,000 | ||||||
Interest income |
2,000 | 1,000 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(7,000 | ) | (7,000 | ) | ||||
Net loss |
$ | (3,713,000 | ) | $ | (2,502,000 | ) | ||
Basic and diluted loss per common share |
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | ||
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding |
30,219,318 | 21,808,816 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
April 2, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (See Note) | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 16,112,000 | $ | 6,069,000 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
579,000 | 108,000 | ||||||
Inventory, net |
1,954,000 | 2,230,000 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
224,000 | 344,000 | ||||||
Total Current Assets |
18,869,000 | 8,751,000 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$22,129,000 and $21,948,000, respectively |
1,719,000 | 1,334,000 | ||||||
Patents, licenses and purchased technology, net of accumulated amortization
of $2,277,000 and $2,494,000, respectively |
1,517,000 | 2,274,000 | ||||||
Other assets |
208,000 | 210,000 | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 22,313,000 | $ | 12,569,000 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 1,162,000 | $ | 548,000 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
825,000 | 517,000 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
23,000 | 31,000 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
2,010,000 | 1,096,000 | ||||||
Other long term liabilities |
601,000 | 577,000 | ||||||
Total Liabilities |
2,611,000 | 1,673,000 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies-Notes 6 and 7 |
||||||||
Stockholders Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized,
611,523 shares issued and outstanding |
1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized,
33,023,687 and 27,217,408 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
33,000 | 28,000 | ||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
261,014,000 | 248,500,000 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(241,346,000 | ) | (237,633,000 | ) | ||||
Total Stockholders Equity |
19,702,000 | 10,896,000 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
$ | 22,313,000 | $ | 12,569,000 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
Note December 31, 2010 balances were derived from audited financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
April 2, 2011 | April 3, 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (3,713,000 | ) | $ | (2,502,000 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for
operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
211,000 | 258,000 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
395,000 | 234,000 | ||||||
Write-off of intangibles |
770,000 | | ||||||
Provision for excess and obsolete inventories |
| 90,000 | ||||||
Fair value of derivatives |
| (42,000 | ) | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(471,000 | ) | (280,000 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
277,000 | 289,000 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
120,000 | 185,000 | ||||||
Patents and licenses |
(42,000 | ) | (66,000 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
2,000 | 9,000 | ||||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
405,000 | 648,000 | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(2,046,000 | ) | (1,177,000 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(35,000 | ) | (80,000 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(35,000 | ) | (80,000 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Repurchase of common shares for withholding obligations |
(278,000 | ) | (573,000 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from the sale of common stock |
12,402,000 | | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
12,124,000 | (573,000 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
10,043,000 | (1,830,000 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
6,069,000 | 10,365,000 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 16,112,000 | $ | 8,535,000 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. General
Superconductor Technologies Inc. (together with our subsidiaries, we or us) was
incorporated in Delaware on May 11, 1987. We maintain our headquarters in Santa Barbara,
California. We develop and produce high temperature superconducting (HTS) materials and associated
technologies. We have generated more than 100 patents and patent applications as well as proprietary trade secrets and
manufacturing expertise, providing interference elimination and network enhancement solutions to
the commercial wireless industry. In addition, we are now leveraging our key enabling
technologies, including radio frequency filtering, HTS materials and cryogenics, to pursue emerging
opportunities in the electrical grid and in equipment platforms that utilize electrical circuits.
From 1987 to 1997, we were engaged primarily in research and development and generated
revenues primarily from government research contracts. Since then, we have provided solutions for
wireless infrastructure in the telecommunications industry. Our commercial product offerings are
divided into the following three areas: SuperLink® (high-temperature superconducting filters),
AmpLink® (high performance, ground-mounted amplifiers) and SuperPlex (high performance
multiplexers). In addition, we have strategic initiatives for an HTS wire platform, RF filters and
cryocoolers.
For the three months ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, commercial revenues accounted for
99% and 68%, respectively, of our net revenues.
Our research and development contracts are used as a source of funds for our commercial
technology development. We continue to be involved as either contractor or subcontractor on a
number of contracts with the U.S. government. For the three months ended April 2, 2011 and April
3, 2010, government related contracts accounted for 1% and 32%, respectively, of our net revenues.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial information furnished herein has been prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and reflects all adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which in the opinion of management, are necessary
for a fair statement of the results of operations for the periods presented.
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the condensed consolidated
financial statements. This quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our
Form 10-K for 2010, The results of operations for the three months ended April 2, 2011 are not
necessarily indicative of the results for all of 2011.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
For the three months ended April 2, 2011, we incurred a net loss $3.7 million and negative
cash flows from operations of $2.0 million. For all of 2010, we incurred a net loss of $12.0
million and had negative cash flows from operations of $9.4 million.
At April 2, 2011, we had $16.1 million in cash and cash equivalents. We believe our cash
resources, together with our line of credit will be sufficient to fund our planned operations for
the next twelve months. We believe the key factors to our liquidity will be our ability to
successfully use our expertise and our technology to generate revenues in various ways, including
commercial operations, government contracts, joint ventures and licenses. Because of the
uncertainty of these factors, we may need to raise funds to meet our working capital needs. If we
require additional financing, we cannot assure you that additional financing will be available on
acceptable terms or at all. If we issue additional equity securities to raise funds, the ownership
percentage of our existing stockholders would be reduced. New investors may demand rights,
preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of common stock. If we cannot raise
any needed funds, we might be forced to make further substantial reductions in our operating
expenses, which could adversely affect our ability to implement our current business plan and
ultimately our viability as a company.
Our condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from this uncertainty. Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
assuming that we will continue as a going concern.
5
Table of Contents
Principles of Consolidation
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Superconductor
Technologies Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have
been eliminated from the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of
three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with what we believe to be quality
financial institutions and from time to time exceed FDIC limits. Historically, we have not
experienced any losses due to such concentration of credit risk.
Accounts Receivable
We sell predominantly to entities in the wireless communications industry and to
entities of the U.S. government. We grant uncollateralized credit to our customers. We perform
usual and customary credit evaluations of our customers before granting credit. Trade accounts
receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for
doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing
accounts receivable. We determine the allowance based on historical write-off experience. Past
due balances are reviewed for collectibility. Accounts balances are charged off against the
allowance when we deem it is probable the receivable will not be recovered. We do not have any off
-balance sheet credit exposure related to our customers.
Revenue Recognition
Commercial revenues are principally derived from the sale of our SuperLink, AmpLink and
SuperPlex family of products and are recognized once all of the following conditions have been met:
a) an authorized purchase order has been received in writing, b) customers credit worthiness has
been established, c) shipment of the product has occurred, d) title has transferred, and e) if
stipulated by the contract, customer acceptance has occurred and all significant vendor
obligations, if any, have been satisfied.
Contract revenues are principally generated under research and development contracts.
Contract revenues are recognized utilizing the percentage-of-completion method measured by the
relationship of costs incurred to total estimated contract costs. If the current contract estimate
were to indicate a loss, utilizing the funded amount of the contract, a provision would be made for
the total anticipated loss. Revenues from research related activities are derived primarily from
contracts with agencies of the U.S. Government. Credit risk related to accounts receivable arising
from such contracts is considered minimal. These contracts include cost-plus, fixed price and cost
sharing arrangements and are generally short-term in nature.
All payments to us for work performed on contracts with agencies of the U.S. Government are
subject to adjustment upon audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. Contract audits through
2003 are closed. Based on historical experience and review of current projects in process, we
believe that the audits will not have a significant effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs
Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are included in net commercial product
revenues. Shipping and handling fees associated with freight are generally included in cost of
commercial product revenues.
Warranties
We offer warranties generally ranging from one to five years, depending on the product and
negotiated terms of purchase agreements with our customers. Such warranties require us to repair
or replace defective product returned to us during such warranty period at no cost to the customer.
An estimate by us for warranty related costs is recorded by us at the time of sale based on our
actual historical product return rates and expected repair costs. Such costs have been within our
expectations.
Guarantees
In connection with the sales and manufacturing of our commercial products, we indemnify,
without limit or term, our customers and contract manufacturers against all claims, suits, demands,
damages, liabilities, expenses, judgments, settlements and penalties arising from actual or alleged
infringement or misappropriation of any intellectual property relating to our products or other
claims arising from our products. We cannot reasonably develop an estimate of the maximum potential
amount of payments that might be made under our guarantees because of the uncertainty as to whether
a claim might arise and how much it might total. Historically, we have not incurred any expenses
related to these guarantees.
6
Table of Contents
Research and Development Costs
Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred and include salary,
facility, depreciation and material expenses. Research and development costs are charged to
research and development expense. Research and development costs incurred solely in connection with
research and development contracts are charged to government and other contract expense.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with costs primarily determined using
standard costs, which approximate actual costs utilizing the first-in, first-out method. We review
inventory quantities on hand and on order and record, on a quarterly basis, a provision for excess
and obsolete inventory and/or vendor cancellation charges related to purchase commitments. If the
results of the review determine that a write-down is necessary, we recognize a loss in the period
in which the loss is identified, whether or not the inventory is retained. Our inventory reserves
establish a new cost basis for inventory and are not reversed until we sell or dispose of the
related inventory. Such provisions are established based on historical usage, adjusted for known
changes in demands for such products, or the estimated forecast of product demand and production
requirements. Costs associated with idle capacity are charged to expense immediately.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Equipment is depreciated using the straight-line
method over their estimated useful lives ranging from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements
and assets financed under capital leases are amortized over the shorter of their useful lives or
the lease term. Furniture and fixtures are depreciated over seven years. Expenditures for
additions and major improvements are capitalized. Expenditures for minor tooling, repairs and
maintenance and minor improvements are charged to expense as incurred. When property or equipment
is retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from
the accounts. Gains or losses from retirements and disposals are recorded in selling, general and
administration expenses.
Patents, Licenses and Purchased Technology
Patents and licenses are recorded at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method
over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or approximately seventeen years. Purchased
technology acquired through the acquisition of Conductus, Inc. in 2002 was recorded at our
estimated fair value and was amortized using the straight-line method over seven years ending in
2009.
Long-Lived Assets
The realizability of long-lived assets is evaluated periodically as events or circumstances
indicate a possible inability to recover the carrying amount. Long-lived assets that will no
longer be used in business are written off in the period identified since they will no longer
generate any positive cash flows for us. Long-lived assets that will continue to be used by us are
periodically evaluated for recoverability. Such evaluation is based on various analyses, including
cash flow and profitability projections. The analyses necessarily involve significant management
judgment. In the event the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than net book value of the
assets, the carrying value of the assets is written down to its estimated fair value. We tested
our long lived assets for recoverability during 2010 and did not believe that there was any
impairment.
While we believe the expected cash flows from these long-lived assets, including intangible
assets, exceed the carrying amounts, materially different assumptions regarding future performance
and discount rates could result in future impairment losses. In particular, if we no longer believe
we will achieve our long-term projected sales or operating expenses, we may conclude, in connection
with any future impairment tests, that the estimated fair value of our long-lived assets, including
intangible assets, is less than the book value and recognize an impairment charge. Any impairment
charge would adversely affect our earnings.
Other Investments
From time to time we may pursue joint ventures with other entities to commercialize our
technology. In 2007, we formed a joint venture with Hunchun BaoLi Communication Co. Ltd. to
manufacture and sell our SuperLink interference elimination solution in China. We use the equity
method of accounting for our 45 percent joint venture interest. The joint venture agreement called
for our joint venture partner to supply the capital and local expertise, and for us to provide a
license of certain technology and supply key parts for manufacturing. Since 2007, we have been
conducting lab and field trials in the existing China 2G market using our TD-SCDMA and SuperLink
solutions. Although those activities continue, the parties have not completed their contributions
to the joint venture, including most of the funding and our license, within the two year period
specified by the agreement and Chinese law. The future of the joint venture, including any
commencement of manufacturing and the transfer of our processes, will depend on product demand in
China, completion of funding by our joint
venture partner, as well as a number of other conditions, including certain critical approvals from
the Chinese and U.S. governments. There continues to be no assurance that these conditions will be
met and even if these conditions are met and the approvals received, the results from our joint
venture will be subject to a number of significant risks associated with international operations
and new ventures, some of which are set forth in our public filings, including in particular the
Risk Factors included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2010. We incurred no
expenses in the quarter ended April 2, 2011 or in the full year 2010 as a result of this joint
venture.
7
Table of Contents
Loss Contingencies
In the normal course of our business we are subject to claims and litigation, including
allegations of patent infringement. Liabilities relating to these claims are recorded when it is
determined that a loss is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The
costs of our defense in such matters are expensed as incurred. Insurance proceeds recoverable are
recorded when deemed probable.
Income Taxes
We recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax
rates in effect in the years the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax benefit
(expense) results from the change in net deferred tax assets or deferred tax liabilities. A
valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some or all deferred tax
assets will not be realized. The guidance further clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes and sets a consistent framework to determine the appropriate level of tax reserve to
maintain for uncertain tax positions. This interpretation uses a two-step approach wherein a tax
benefit is recognized if a position is more-likely-than-not to be sustained. The amount of the
benefit is then measured to be the highest tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be
realized and sets out disclosure requirements to enhance transparency of our tax reserves. The
adoption of this guidance has not had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements as
we concluded our tax positions are highly certain of being settled at 100% of the benefit
claimed. Guidance is also provided on the accounting for the related interest and
penalties, financial statement and disclosure. We are currently not under examination by any taxing
authority nor have we been notified of an impending examination. The oldest tax year that remains
open to possible evaluation and interpretation of our tax position is 1996.
As of December 31, 2010, we had net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state income
tax purposes of approximately $303.1 million and $191.9 million, respectively, which expire in the
years 2011 through 2030. However, during 2010 we concluded that under the Internal Revenue Code
change of control limitations, a maximum of $81.9 million and $55.0 million, respectively, would be
available for reduction of taxable income and reduced both the deferred tax asset and valuation
allowance accordingly. Due to the uncertainty surrounding their realization, we recorded a full
valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets. Accordingly, no deferred tax asset has
been recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Marketing Costs
All costs related to marketing and advertising our products are charged to expense
as incurred or at the time the advertising takes place. Advertising costs were not material in each
of the quarters ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010.
Net Loss Per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available to
common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding in each year.
Potential common shares are not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share because their
effect is anti-dilutive.
Stock-based Compensation
We grant both restricted stock awards and stock options to our key employees, directors and
consultants. There were no grants in the quarter ended April 3, 2010. For the quarter ended April
2, 2011 the weighted average fair value of options was estimated at the date of the grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following are the significant weighted average assumptions
used for estimating the fair value under our stock option plans:
Three months ended | ||||
April 2, 2011 | ||||
Expected life in years |
4.0 | |||
Risk free interest rate |
1.52 | % | ||
Expected volatility |
111 | % | ||
Dividend yield |
0 | % |
8
Table of Contents
The expected life was based on the contractual term of the options and expected employee
exercise behavior. Typically, options to our employees have a 2 to 4 year vesting term and a 10
year contractual term. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues
with a remaining term equal to the expected option life assumed at the grant date. The future
volatility is based on our 4 year historical volatility. We used an expected dividend yield of 0%
because we have never paid a dividend and do not anticipate paying dividends. We assumed a 10%
forfeiture rate based on our historical stock option cancellation rates over the last 4 years.
The stock-based compensation expense for our restricted stock awards is measured at fair value
on the date of grant based on the number of shares expected to vest and the quoted market price of
our common stock. We also assumed a 10% forfeiture rate for our restricted stock awards based on
our historical cancellation rates over the last 4 years.
The following table presents details of total stock-based compensation expense that is
included in each functional line item on our condensed consolidated statements of operations:
Three months ended | ||||||||
April 2, 2011 | April 3, 2010 | |||||||
Cost of Revenue |
$ | 4,000 | $ | 5,000 | ||||
Research and development |
114,000 | 56,000 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
277,000 | 173,000 | ||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 395,000 | $ | 234,000 | ||||
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting periods. The significant estimates in the preparation of the financial statements
relate to the assessment of the carrying amount of accounts receivable, inventory, fixed assets,
intangibles, estimated provisions for warranty costs, contract revenues, income taxes and
disclosures related to litigation. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such
differences may be material to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We have estimated the fair value amounts of our financial instruments using the available
market information and valuation methodologies considered appropriate. We determined the book value
of our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid expenses and other
current assets, lines of credit and other current liabilities as of
April 2, 2011 approximate fair
value.
Comprehensive Income
We have no items of other comprehensive income in any period and consequently have
not included a Statement of Comprehensive Income.
Segment Information
We operate in a single business segment, the research, development, manufacture and
marketing of high performance products used in cellular base stations to maximize the performance
of wireless telecommunications networks by improving the quality of uplink signals from mobile
wireless devices. We currently derive net commercial product revenues primarily from the sales of
our SuperLink, AmpLink and SuperPlex products. We currently sell most of our products directly to
wireless network operators in the United States. Net revenues derived principally from government
research and development contracts are presented separately on the condensed consolidated statement
of operations for all periods presented.
Certain Risks and Uncertainties
Our long-term prospects are dependent upon the continued and increased market acceptance for
the products.
We currently sell most of our products directly to wireless network operators in the United
States and our product sales have historically been concentrated in a small number of customers. At
April 2, 2011, we had two customers that represented 84% and 10% of total net revenues and 96% of
accounts receivable. In 2010, these two customers represented 58% and 12% of total net revenues and
31% of accounts receivable. The loss of or reduction in sales, or the inability to collect
outstanding
accounts receivable, from any of these customers could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
9
Table of Contents
We currently rely on a limited number of suppliers for key components of our products. The
loss of any of these suppliers could have material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In connection with the sales of our commercial products, we indemnify, without limit or term,
our customers against all claims, suits, demands, damages, liabilities, expenses, judgments,
settlements and penalties arising from actual or alleged infringement or misappropriation of any
intellectual property relating to our products or other claims arising from our products. We cannot
reasonably develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of payments that might be made under
our indemnity obligations because of the uncertainty as to whether a claim might arise and how much
it might total.
3. Short Term Borrowings
We have a line of credit with a bank. There was no amount outstanding under this borrowing
facility at April 2, 2011. The line of credit expires in July 2011 and is structured as a sale of
accounts receivable. The agreement provides for the sale of up to $3.0 million of eligible accounts
receivable, with advances to us totaling 80% of the receivables sold. Any advances bear interest
at the banks prime rate (4.0% at April 2, 2011) plus 2.50% subject to a minimum monthly charge.
Advances (if any) under the agreement are collateralized by all our assets. Under the terms of the
agreement, we continue to service the sold receivables and are subject to recourse provisions.
The agreement contains representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and
events of default customary for financings of this type. The failure to comply with these
provisions, or the occurrence of any one of the events of default, would prevent any further
borrowings and would generally require the repayment of any outstanding borrowings. Such
representations, warranties and events of default include (a) non-payment of debt and interest
thereunder, (b) non-compliance with terms of the agreement covenants, (c) insolvency or bankruptcy,
(d) material adverse change, (e) merger or consolidation where our stockholders do not hold a
majority of the voting rights of the surviving entity, (f) transactions outside the normal course
of business, or (g) payment of dividends. At April 2, 2011 we were in compliance with all
covenants.
4. Stockholders Equity
The following is a summary of stockholders equity transactions for the three months ended April 2, 2011:
Convertible | Capital in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Excess of | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Par Value | Deficit | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
611,523 | $ | 1,000 | 27,217,408 | $ | 28,000 | $ | 248,500,000 | $ | (237,633,000 | ) | $ | 10,896,000 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock, net |
5,443,000 | 5,000 | 12,397,000 | 12,402,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock to
satisfy tax withholding obligations |
(170,653 | ) | | (278,000 | ) | (278,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of awards and stock based
compensation |
533,932 | | 395,000 | 395,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
(3,713,000 | ) | (3,713,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at April 2, 2011 |
611,523 | $ | 1,000 | 33,023,687 | $ | 33,000 | $ | 261,014,000 | $ | (241,346,000 | ) | $ | 19,702,000 | |||||||||||||||
Equity Offering
In a registered direct offering completed in February 2011 we raised proceeds of $12.4
million, net of offering costs of $933,000, from the sale of 5,443,000 shares of common stock at
$2.45 per share based on a negotiated discount to market.
Stock Options
At April 2, 2011, we had three equity award option plans, the 1998 and 1999 Stock Option Plans
and the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (collectively, the Stock Option Plans) although we can only
grant new options under the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan. Under the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan,
stock awards may be made to our directors, key employees, consultants, and non-employee directors
and may consist of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, performance
awards, and performance share awards. Stock options must be granted at prices no less than the
market value on the date of grant. There were no stock option exercises during the three months
ended April 2, 2011 or during the three months ended April 3, 2010.
10
Table of Contents
The impact to the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the quarter ended April
2, 2011 on net loss was $171,000 and $0.01 on basic and diluted loss per common share and for the
quarter ended April 3, 2010 the impact was
$129,000 and $0.01 on basic and diluted loss per common share. No stock compensation cost was
capitalized during either period. The total compensation cost related to nonvested awards not yet
recognized was $1.5 million and the weighted-average period over which the cost is expected to be
recognized was 1.5 years at April 2, 2011.
The following is a summary of stock option transactions under our stock option plans at
April 2, 2011:
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||
Average | Number of | Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Exercise | Options | Exercise | |||||||||||||||||
Shares | Price Per Share | Price | Exercisable | Price | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December
31, 2010 |
1,083,366 | $ | 1.43 $79.38 | $ | 6.43 | 830,552 | $ | 7.57 | ||||||||||||
Granted |
618,932 | 1.58 2.86 | 1.81 | |||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Canceled |
(2,270 | ) | 51.56 79.38 | 67.12 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at April 2, 2011 |
1,700,028 | $ | 1.43 $74.50 | $ | 4.67 | 842,625 | $ | 7.36 | ||||||||||||
The outstanding options expire on various dates through the end of January 2021. The
weighted-average contractual term of options outstanding is 7.6 years and the weighted-average
contractual term of stock options currently exercisable is 5.7 years. The exercise prices for these
options range from $1.43 to $74.50 per share, for an aggregate exercise price of approximately $7.9
million. At April 2, 2011, outstanding options covering 858,000 shares, with an intrinsic value of
$1.0 million, had an exercise price less than the current market value and 20,400 of these shares,
with an intrinsic value of $19,000 were exercisable.
Restricted Stock Awards
The grant date fair value of each share of our restricted stock awards is equal to the fair
value of our common stock at the grant date. Shares of restricted stock under awards all have
service conditions and vest over one to four years. Some of our grants also have performance
conditions. The following is a summary of our restricted stock award transactions at April 2, 2011:
Weighted | ||||||||
Number of | Average Grant | |||||||
Shares | Date Fair Value | |||||||
Balance nonvested at December 31, 2010 |
720,723 | $ | 1.84 | |||||
Granted |
533,932 | 1.58 | ||||||
Vested |
(390,612 | ) | 1.05 | |||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||
Balance nonvested at April 2, 2011 |
864,043 | $ | 2.04 | |||||
For the majority of restricted stock awards granted, the number of shares
issued on the date the restricted stock awards vest is net of the minimum statutory withholding
requirements that we pay in cash to the appropriate taxing authorities on behalf of our employees.
During the three months ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, we withheld 170,653 shares and
181,982 shares, respectively, to satisfy $278,000 and $573,000, respectively, of employees tax
obligations.
The impact to the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended
April 2, 2011 was $224,000 and $0.01 on basic and diluted loss per common share and for the quarter
ended April 3, 2010 the impact was $105,000 and $0.01 on basic and diluted loss per common share.
No stock compensation cost was capitalized during the period. The total compensation cost related
to nonvested awards not yet recognized was $1.0 million and the weighted-average period over which
the cost is expected to be recognized was 10 months.
Warrants
The following is a summary of outstanding warrants at April 2, 2011:
Common Shares | ||||||||||||||||
Currently | Price per | |||||||||||||||
Total | Exercisable | Share | Expiration Date | |||||||||||||
Warrants related to April 2004 financing |
10,000 | 10,000 | $ | 18.50 | April 28, 2011 | * |
* | The terms of these warrants contain net exercise provisions, under which holders can elect to receive common stock equal to the difference between the exercise price and the sale price for common shares on the exercise date or the date immediately preceding the exercise date instead of paying the exercise price in cash. |
11
Table of Contents
5. Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding.
Since their impact would be anti-dilutive, our loss per common share does not include the
effect of the assumed exercise or vesting of the following shares:
April 2, 2011 | April 3, 2010 | |||||||
Outstanding stock options |
1,700,028 | 980,295 | ||||||
Unvested restricted stock awards |
864,043 | 567,999 | ||||||
Outstanding warrants |
10,000 | 618,237 | ||||||
Total |
2,574,071 | 2,166,531 | ||||||
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases
We lease our offices and production facilities under a non-cancelable operating lease that
expires in November 2016. This lease contains escalation clauses for increases in annual renewal
options and requires us to pay utilities, insurance, taxes and other operating expenses.
For the three months ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, rent expense was $277,000 and
$286,000, respectively.
Patents and Licenses
We have entered into various licensing agreements requiring royalty payments ranging from
0.13% to 2.5% of specified product sales. Certain of these agreements contain provisions for the
payment of guaranteed or minimum royalty amounts. In the event that we fail to pay minimum annual
royalties, these licenses may automatically become non-exclusive or be terminated. These royalty
obligations terminate at various times from 2011 to 2020. For the three months ended April 2, 2011
and April 3, 2010, royalty expense totaled $43,000 and $46,000, respectively. Under the terms of
certain royalty agreements, royalty payments made may be subject to audit. There have been no
audits to date and we do not expect future audit adjustments to be significant.
The minimum lease payments under operating leases and license obligations are as
follows:
Years ending December 31, | Licenses | Operating Leases | ||||||
Remainder of 2011 |
$ | 25,000 | $ | 979,000 | ||||
2012 |
25,000 | 1,336,000 | ||||||
2013 |
25,000 | 1,368,000 | ||||||
2014 |
30,000 | 1,408,000 | ||||||
2015 |
45,000 | 1,448,000 | ||||||
Thereafter |
135,000 | 1,364,000 | ||||||
Total payments |
$ | 285,000 | $ | 7,903,000 | ||||
During the three months ended April 2, 2011, we decided to use certain of our own
technologies and as a result we voluntarily terminated a patent license we had with a third party
along with certain other intangible assets. As a result, capitalized cost of $0.8 million was
expensed during the quarter and a $1.35 million license obligation was terminated. The above table
reflects that termination.
7. Contractual Guarantees and Indemnities
During our normal course of business, we make certain contractual guarantees and indemnities
pursuant to which we may be required to make future payments under specific circumstances. We have
not recorded any liability for these contractual guarantees and indemnities in the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements.
12
Table of Contents
Warranties
We establish reserves for future product warranty costs that are expected to be incurred
pursuant to specific warranty provisions with our customers. Our warranty reserves are established
at the time of sale and updated throughout the warranty period based upon numerous factors
including historical warranty return rates and expenses over various warranty periods.
Intellectual Property Indemnities
We indemnify certain customers and our contract manufacturers against liability arising from
third-party claims of intellectual property rights infringement related to our products. These
indemnities appear in development and supply agreements with our customers as well as manufacturing
service agreements with our contract manufacturers, are not limited in amount or duration and
generally survive the expiration of the contract. Given that the amount of potential liabilities
related to such indemnities cannot be determined until an infringement claim has been made, we are
unable to determine the maximum amount of losses that we could incur related to such
indemnifications.
Director and Officer Indemnities and Contractual Guarantees
We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers
which require us to indemnify such individuals to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.
Our indemnification obligations under such agreements are not limited in amount or duration.
Certain costs incurred in connection with such indemnities may be recovered under certain
circumstances under various insurance policies. Given that the amount of any potential liabilities
related to such indemnities cannot be determined until a lawsuit has been filed against a director
or executive officer, we are unable to determine the maximum amount of losses that we could incur
relating to such indemnities. Historically, any amounts payable pursuant to such director and
officer indemnities have not had a material negative effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operations.
We have also entered into severance and change in control agreements with certain of our
executives. These agreements provide for the payment of specific compensation benefits to such
executives upon the termination of their employment with us.
General Contractual Indemnities/Products Liability
During the normal course of business, we enter into contracts with customers where we agree to
indemnify the other party for personal injury or property damage caused by our products. Our
indemnification obligations under such agreements are not generally limited in amount or duration.
Given that the amount of any potential liabilities related to such indemnities cannot be determined
until a lawsuit has been filed, we are unable to determine the maximum amount of losses that we
could incur relating to such indemnities. Historically, any amounts payable pursuant to such
indemnities have not had a material negative effect our business, financial condition or results of
operations. We maintain general and product liability insurance as well as errors and omissions
insurance which may provide a source of recovery to us in the event of an indemnification claim.
8. Details of Certain Financial Statement Components and Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow
Information and Non-Cash Activities
Balance Sheet Data:
April 2, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Accounts receivable: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable-trade |
$ | 576,000 | $ | 36,000 | ||||
U.S. government accounts receivable-billed |
5,000 | 74,000 | ||||||
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts |
(2,000 | ) | (2,000 | ) | ||||
$ | 579,000 | $ | 108,000 | |||||
April 2, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Inventories: |
||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 1,408,000 | $ | 1,499,000 | ||||
Work-in-process |
569,000 | 511,000 | ||||||
Finished goods |
1,070,000 | 1,316,000 | ||||||
Less inventory reserve |
(1,093,000 | ) | (1,096,000 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,954,000 | $ | 2,230,000 | |||||
13
Table of Contents
April 2, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Property and Equipment: |
||||||||
Equipment |
$ | 16,642,000 | $ | 16,092,000 | ||||
Leasehold improvements |
6,802,000 | 6,786,000 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
404,000 | 404,000 | ||||||
23,848,000 | 23,282,000 | |||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(22,129,000 | ) | (21,948,000 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,719,000 | $ | 1,334,000 | |||||
Depreciation expense amounted to $182,000 and $234,000 for the three month periods ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010,
respectively.
April 2, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Patents and Licenses: |
||||||||
Patents pending |
$ | 633,000 | $ | 1,110,000 | ||||
Patents issued |
1,455,000 | 1,382,000 | ||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(571,000 | ) | (554,000 | ) | ||||
Net patents issued |
884,000 | 828,000 | ||||||
Licenses Pending |
| 7,000 | ||||||
Licenses Issued |
| 563,000 | ||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
| (234,000 | ) | |||||
Net licenses |
| 329,000 | ||||||
Purchased technology |
1,706,000 | 1,706,000 | ||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(1,706,000 | ) | (1,706,000 | ) | ||||
Net purchased technology |
| | ||||||
$ | 1,517,000 | $ | 2,274,000 | |||||
Amortization expense related to these items totaled $29,000 and $24,000, for the three month periods ended April 2, 2011 and April
3, 2010, respectively. Amortization expenses are expected to total $58,000 for the remainder of 2011 and $76,000 in each of 2012
and 2013.
April 2, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Accrued Expenses and Other Long Term
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Salaries Payable |
$ | 214,000 | $ | 116,000 | ||||
Compensated Absences |
314,000 | 246,000 | ||||||
Compensation related |
92,000 | 27,000 | ||||||
Warranty reserve |
299,000 | 289,000 | ||||||
Deferred rent |
399,000 | 391,000 | ||||||
Other |
131,000 | 56,000 | ||||||
1,449,000 | 1,125,000 | |||||||
Less current portion |
(848,000 | ) | (548,000 | ) | ||||
Long term portion |
$ | 601,000 | $ | 577,000 | ||||
For the three months ended, | ||||||||
April 2, 2011 | April 3, 2010 | |||||||
Warranty Reserve Activity: |
||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 289,000 | $ | 255,000 | ||||
Additions |
13,000 | 42,000 | ||||||
Deductions |
(3,000 | ) | (6,000 | ) | ||||
Ending balance |
$ | 299,000 | $ | 291,000 | ||||
9.
Subsequent Events
We
evaluated subsequent events through the date the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements were issued. Pursuant to
the requirements of ASC 855, Subsequent Events, we have
included all accounting and disclosure requirements related to
subsequent events in our condensed consolidated financial statements.
14
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
General
We are a leading company in high temperature superconductor (HTS) materials and related
technologies. HTS materials have the unique ability to conduct various signals or energy (e.g.
electrical current or radio frequency (RF) signals) with little or no resistance when cooled to
critical temperatures. Electric currents that flow through conventional conductors encounter
resistance that requires power to overcome and generates heat. HTS materials can substantially
improve the performance characteristics of electrical systems, reducing power loss, lowering heat
generation and decreasing electrical noise. Circuits designed to remove interference inherent in
some RF signals can also be made from HTS materials. Commercial use of HTS materials requires a
number of cutting edge technologies, including development of HTS materials, specialized
manufacturing expertise to create uniform thin layers of these materials, expert designs of
circuits optimized for HTS materials, and technologies to maintain an extremely low temperature
environment for HTS applications (although the critical temperatures for HTS are high compared
with traditional superconductors, but they are still extremely cold by other standards).
Strategic Initiatives
In addition to our ongoing design, manufacture, and sale of high performance infrastructure
products for wireless voice and data applications described below, we have created several unique
capabilities and HTS manufacturing system that we are seeking to strategically deploy. The
capabilities relate to a new wire platform, RF filters and cryocoolers:
| Wire Platform. Following a review of our technical capabilities and core competencies, we determined that extending our HTS materials production into a new wire platform for power applications offers an attractive strategic business opportunity. Our second generation (2G) HTS wire product development is focused on large markets where the advantages of HTS wire are recognized by the industry. Our initial product roadmap targets three important applications: |
| Superconducting High Power Transmission Cables: HTS advanced power transmission cable transmits five to twenty times the electrical power of traditional copper or aluminum cables with much improved efficiency. |
| Superconducting Fault Current Limiters (SFCL): SFCLs act like powerful surge protectors, preventing harmful faults from taking down costly substation equipment. SFCLs enable the energy efficient connections of distributed power sources to the grid, fast reliable grid protection, and utilize smart grid design criteria. |
| Superconducting Wind Turbine Generators: Superconducting wind turbines allow utilities to add more power per tower by significantly reducing turbine size and weight and improving power generation efficiency. |
While substantial technical challenges and business challenges remain before we have a commercially successful product introduction, we recently announced that we successfully produced 2G HTS wire samples that meet requirements specified by customers for HTS AC power cable, SFCLs and HTS wind turbine applications. We also announced high-magnetic-field test results for our 2G HTS wire. In an ongoing collaborative research and development agreement with Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), we and LANL produced a 2G HTS wire sample that demonstrates exceptional in-field critical current values. This current-carrying capability in high magnetic field demonstrates the effectiveness of our HTS fabrication process at producing 2G HTS wire for demanding applications such as superconducting fault current limiters and high-power wind turbine generators. |
| RF Filters. Conventional RF filters are fabricated primarily from aluminum blocks with hollow cavities, resonators, and tuning elements incorporated to make a frequency specific filter. Our filter structures resemble a circuit on a semiconductor using a circuit that is etched into HTS materials that are deposited on a wafer. Our unique and innovative circuits allow us to utilize the characteristics of the HTS materials for this application. We have also developed unique tuning methods that allow us to produce a frequency specific filter. |
| Cryocoolers. HTS circuits need to be cooled to the critical temperature that enables the superconducting properties of the materials to be utilized. To meet this need, we developed a unique cryocooler that can efficiently and reliably cool the circuit to the critical temperature (77 degrees Kelvin). As a result, our wireless products are maintenance free and reliable enough to be deployed for many years. |
15
Table of Contents
Our HTS Manufacturing System
We consider our unique manufacturing systems to be significant to our business plan and
competitive positioning, especially for our wire platform initiative. We have developed a
proprietary Reactive Co-Evaporation and Cyclical Deposition Reaction (RCE-CDR), or simply RCE,
deposition technique that allows us to precisely control growth rates, the relative proportions of
metals and the chamber temperature. The process further allows us to precisely control and make the
refinements necessary for a high-yield, high-output manufacturing. After extensive evaluation of a
number of HTS compounds that include one or more of these HTS elements we chose yttrium barium
copper oxide (YBCO) as the compound with the best properties for the applications we were pursuing.
Utilizing this tightly controlled process and revolutionary RCE deposition method we increased
production yield of our YBCO wafers to over 95%. In addition, because we can control the factors
that determine the structure of the HTS crystal being grown, we are able to make innovative changes
to the crystal to optimize its performance for various applications.
Our Proprietary Technology
We are focused on research and development to maintain our technological edge. As of April 2,
2011, we had 23 employees in our research and development division; 6 of our employees have
Ph.D.s, and 6 others hold advanced degrees in physics, materials science, electrical engineering
and other fields. Our development efforts over the last 23 years have yielded an extensive patent
portfolio as well as critical trade secrets, unpatented technology and proprietary knowledge. We
enter into confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with our employees, suppliers and
consultants to protect our proprietary information. As of April 2, 2011, we held 63 U.S. patents
in addition to 14 issued foreign patents, 8 U.S. patent applications pending and 30 foreign
applications patents pending.
We are currently focusing our development efforts on superconducting power applications. As
discussed above, we are adapting our unique HTS materials deposition techniques to deliver energy
efficient, cost-effective and high performance 2G HTS wire technology for next generation power
applications. We have identified several large initial target markets for our 2G HTS wire
including energy (wind turbines, smart grid) and industrial (motors, generators) applications. To
accelerate development and manufacturing processes for our 2G HTS wire, we are partnering with HTS
industry leaders such as the United States National Labs and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).
In August 2009, we renewed our two year Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with Los
Alamos National Laboratory. These technological interchanges will help us meet the technical
challenges and performance metrics for both high performance and cost effective 2G HTS wire.
Our development efforts (including those described above under Strategic Initiatives) can take
a significant number of years to commercialize, and we must overcome significant technical barriers
and deal with other significant risks, some of which are set out in our public filings, including
in particular the Risk Factors included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2010.
Our Wireless Business
Our current revenue comes from the design, manufacture, and sale of high performance
infrastructure products for wireless voice and data applications. We have three current product
lines, all of which relate to wireless base stations:
| SuperLink, a highly compact and reliable receiver front-end HTS wireless filter system to eliminate out-of-band interference for wireless base stations, combining filters with a proprietary cryogenic cooler and a cooled low-noise amplifier. |
| AmpLink, a ground-mounted unit for wireless base stations that includes a high-performance amplifier and up to six dual duplexers. |
| SuperPlex, a high-performance multiplexer that provides extremely low insertion loss and excellent cross-band isolation designed to eliminate the need for additional base station antennas and reduce infrastructure costs. |
16
Table of Contents
We sell most of our current commercial products to a small number of wireless carriers in the
United States, including Alltel, AT&T Mobility, Sprint Nextel, T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless.
Verizon Wireless and AT&T Mobility each accounted for more than 10% of our commercial revenues in
the three months ended April 2, 2011 and for all of 2010. We are seeking to expand our customer
base by selling directly to other wireless network operators and manufacturers of base station
equipment, including internationally. Demand for wireless communications equipment fluctuates
dramatically and unpredictably. The wireless communications infrastructure equipment market is
extremely competitive and is characterized by rapid technological change, new product development,
product obsolescence, evolving industry standards and price erosion over the life of a product. We
face constant pressures to reduce prices. Consequently, we expect the average selling prices of our
products will continue decreasing over time. We expect these trends to continue and may cause
significant fluctuations in our quarterly and annual revenues. Our commercial operations are
subject to a number of significant risks, some of which are set out in our public filings,
including in particular the Risk Factors included in Item 1A of this Report.
Other Investments
From time to time we may pursue business relationships with other entities to commercialize
our technology. In 2007, we formed a joint venture with Hunchun BaoLi Communication Co. Ltd. to
manufacture and sell our SuperLink interference elimination solution in China. We use the equity
method of accounting for our 45 percent joint venture interest. The joint venture agreement called
for our joint venture partner to supply the capital and local expertise, and for us to provide a
license of certain technology and supply key parts for manufacturing. Since 2007, we have been
conducting lab and field trials in the existing China wireless market using our TD-SCDMA and
SuperLink solutions. Although those activities continue, the parties have not completed their
contributions to the joint venture, including most of the funding and our license, within the two
year period specified by the agreement and Chinese law. The future of the joint venture, including
any commencement of manufacturing and the transfer of our processes, will depend on product demand
in China, completion of funding by our joint venture partner, as well as a number of other
conditions, including certain critical approvals from the Chinese and U.S. governments. There
continues to be no assurance that these conditions will be met and even if these conditions are met
and the approvals received, the results from our joint venture will be subject to a number of
significant risks associated with international operations and new ventures, some of which are set
forth in our public filings, including in particular the Risk Factors included in Item 1A of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2010.
Licenses
From time to time we grant licenses for our technology to other companies. Specifically, we
have granted licenses to, among others, (1) Bruker for Nuclear Magnetic Resonance application, (2)
General Dynamics for government applications and (3) Star Cryoelectronics for Superconducting
Quantum Interference Device applications.
Government Contracts
We generate revenues from government contracts. We typically own the intellectual property
developed under these contracts, and grant the U.S. government a royalty-free, non-exclusive and
nontransferable license to use it. As a result, our government contracts can not only generate a
profit for us, but we can also make additional money through exploiting of the resulting technology
in our commercial operations as well as government products, or through licenses or joint ventures.
Contracts with the U.S. government contain provisions, and are subject to laws and regulations,
that give the government rights and remedies not typically found in commercial contracts, including
rights that allow the government to:
| terminate existing contracts for convenience, which affords the U.S. government the right to terminate the contract in whole or in part any time it wants for any reason or no reason, as well as for default; |
| reduce or modify contracts or subcontracts, if its requirements or budgetary constraints change; |
| cancel or reduce multi-year contracts and related orders, if funds for contract performance for any subsequent year become unavailable; |
| adjust reimbursable contract costs and fees on the basis of audits completed by its agencies through exercise of its oversight rights; and |
| control or prohibit the export of products. |
Compensation in the event of a termination, if any, is limited to compensation for work
completed at the time of termination. In the event of termination for convenience, we may receive a
certain allowance for profit on the work performed.
17
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Quarter Ended April 2, 2011 compared to the Quarter Ended April 3, 2010
Net revenues decreased by $1.8 million, or 53%, to $1.6 million in the first quarter of 2011
from $3.4 million in the first quarter of 2010. Net revenues consist primarily of commercial
product revenues and government contract revenues.
Net commercial product revenues decreased by $0.7 million, or 31%, to $1.6 million in the
first quarter of 2011 from $2.3 million in the first quarter of 2010. The decrease is the result
of lower sales volume for our SuperLink products. The average sales prices for our products were
unchanged. Our three largest customers accounted for 99% of our total net commercial product
revenues in the first quarter of both 2010 and 2011. These customers generally purchase products
through non-binding commitments with minimal lead-times. We also continue to experience challenges
to revenue growth in the commercial wireless market. Consequently, our commercial product revenues
can fluctuate dramatically from quarter to quarter based on changes in our customers capital
spending patterns, and revenues may continue to be impacted by such challenges.
Government contract and other revenues decreased over $1.0 million from $1.1 million in the
first quarter of 2010 to $17,000 in the first quarter of 2011. This decrease is attributable to
the completion of a major contract in 2010 and our current use of our relatively fixed engineering
resources for research and development.
Cost of commercial product revenues includes all direct costs, manufacturing overhead and
provision for excess and obsolete inventories. The cost of commercial product revenues decreased
to $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to $2.4 million for the first quarter of
2010, a decrease of $0.7 million or 30%. The lower costs resulted principally from lower
production as a result of lower sales. We had no additional expense provision for obsolete
inventories in the first quarter of 2011 compared to $90,000 in the first quarter of 2010.
Our cost of commercial sales includes both variable and fixed cost components. The variable
component consists primarily of materials, assembly and test labor, overhead, which includes
equipment and facility depreciation, transportation costs and warranty costs. The fixed component
includes test equipment and facility depreciation, purchasing and procurement expenses and quality
assurance costs. Given the fixed nature of such costs, the absorption of our production overhead
costs into inventory decreases and the amount of production overhead variances expensed to cost of
sales increases as production volumes decline since we have fewer units to absorb our overhead
costs against. Conversely, the absorption of our production overhead costs into inventory
increases and the amount of production overhead variances expensed to cost of sales decreases as
production volumes increase since we have more units to absorb our overhead costs against. As a
result, our gross profit margins generally decrease as revenue and production volumes decline due
to lower sales volume and higher amounts of production overhead variances expensed to cost of
sales; and our gross profit margins generally increase as our revenue and production volumes
increase due to higher sales volume and lower amounts of production overhead variances expensed to
cost of sales.
The following is an analysis of our commercial product gross profit and margins:
For the quarters ended | ||||||||||||||||
April 2, 2011 | April 3, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net commercial product sales |
$ | 1,603 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,334 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Total cost of commercial
product sales |
1,669 | 104.1 | % | 2,386 | 102.2 | % | ||||||||||
Gross loss |
$ | (66 | ) | (4.1 | %) | $ | (52 | ) | (2.2 | %) | ||||||
We had a gross loss of $66,000 in the first quarter of 2011 from the sale of our commercial
products compared to a gross loss of $52,000 in the first quarter of 2010. We experienced a gross
loss in the first quarters of 2011 and 2010 because the level of commercial sales was insufficient
to cover our fixed manufacturing overhead costs. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand
and provide an allowance for excess and obsolete inventory based on numerous factors including
sales backlog, historical inventory usage, forecasted product demand and production requirements
for the next twelve months. Gross margin in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010 was not impacted by
the sale of previously written-off inventory.
Cost of government and other contract revenues totaled $15,000 in the first quarter of 2011
compared to $774,000 in the first quarter of 2010. Because these contracts are generally priced on
a cost plus basis, increases in revenue generally result in increases in associated costs. As a
percentage of government and other contract revenues, these costs increased to 88%
in the first quarter of 2011 compared to 72% in the first quarter of 2010 because of the very
low level of sales in the current quarter.
18
Table of Contents
Research and development expenses relate principally to development of new products, including
our wireless commercial products, HTS wire products and other products related to our expertise.
We also incur design expenses associated with reducing the cost and improving the manufacturability
of our existing products. Total expenses totaled $2.0 million in the first quarter of 2011
compared to $1.0 million in the same quarter of the prior year. In April 2011 we decided to use
certain of our own technologies and as a result we voluntarily terminated a patent license we had
with a third party along with certain other intangible assets. As a result, capitalized cost of
$0.8 million was expensed during the quarter. The remaining $0.2 million increase is due to our
relatively fixed engineering resources which vary inversely with the amount of those resources
allocated to our government and other contract activities.
Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $1.7 million in the first quarter of
2011, compared to $1.8 million in the first quarter of the prior year. The reduction was primarily
from lower sales expenses.
Other expense included the adjustment of the fair value of 608,237 warrants that were
exercisable for common stock in 2010. The warrants expired in August 2010, so there were no such
charges in the first quarter of 2011.
Interest income increased in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of 2010
because of our higher cash balance.
Interest expense of $7,000 for both the first quarter of 2011 and 2010 was the result of our
line of credit with a bank.
We had a net loss of $3.7 million for the quarter ended April 2, 2011, compared to a net loss
of $2.5 million in the same period last year.
The net loss available to common stockholders totaled $0.12 per common share in the first
quarter of 2011, compared to a net loss of $0.11 per common share in the same period last year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow Analysis
As of April 2, 2011, we had working capital of $16.9 million, including $16.1 million in cash
and cash equivalents, compared to working capital of $7.7 million at December 31, 2010, which
included $6.1 million in cash and cash equivalents. We currently invest our excess cash in
short-term, investment-grade, money-market instruments with maturities of three months or less.
Cash and cash equivalents increased by $10 million from $6.1 million at December 31, 2010 to
$16.1 million at April 2, 2011. Cash was provided by financing activities offset principally by
uses in operations.
Cash used in operations totaled $2.0 million in the first quarter of 2011. We used $2.3
million to fund the cash portion of our net loss. We also used cash to fund a $0.5 million
increase in accounts receivable and patents, offset by cash provided by a $0.8 million decrease in
inventory and prepaid expenses and other assets, as well as an increase in accounts payable and
accrued expenses.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $35,000 in the first quarter of 2011 compared to
$80,000 in the first quarter of last year. In the both quarters the cash was used to purchase
property and equipment.
We used $278,000 in financing activities in the first quarter of 2011 to repurchase common
shares from our employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations that arose upon the vesting of
restricted stock awards.
Financing Activities
We have historically financed our operations through a combination of cash on hand, cash
provided from operations, equipment lease financings, available borrowings under bank lines of
credit and both private and public equity offerings.
Net cash provided by financing activities in the first quarter of 2011 totaled $12.4 million,
net of $933,000 in expenses, from the registered direct sale of 5.4 million shares of common stock
at $2.45 per share in February 2011. During the quarter we also used $278,000 to repurchase common
shares from our employees to satisfy withholding taxes due upon the vesting of their restricted
stock awards.
We have a line of credit with a bank. There was no amount outstanding under this borrowing
facility at April 2, 2011. The line of credit expires in July 2011 and is structured as a sale of
accounts receivable. The agreement provides for the sale of up to $3.0 million of eligible accounts
receivable, with advances to us totaling 80% of the receivables sold. Advances bear interest at
the banks prime rate (4.0% at April 2, 2011) plus 2.50% subject to a minimum monthly charge.
Advances (if any)
under the agreement are collateralized by all our assets. Under the terms of the agreement, we
continue to service the sold receivables and are subject to recourse provisions.
19
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
We have not had any material changes outside of the ordinary course of business in our
contractual obligations as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2010.
Capital Expenditures
We plan to invest approximately $2.2 million in fixed assets during the remainder of 2011.
Future Liquidity
For the quarter ended April 2, 2011, we incurred a net loss of $3.7 million and had negative
cash flows from operations of $2.0 million. In the full 2010 year, we incurred a net loss of $12.0
million and had negative cash flows from operations of $9.4 million. Our independent registered
public accounting firm has included in their audit reports for 2010 and 2009 an explanatory
paragraph expressing doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
At April 2, 2011, we had $16.1 million in cash and cash equivalents. We believe our
cash resources, together with our line of credit will be sufficient to fund our business for the
next twelve months. We believe the key factors to our liquidity will be our ability to
successfully use our expertise and our technology to generate revenues in various ways, including
commercial operations, government contracts, joint ventures and licenses. These factors leave
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Because of the uncertainty of
these factors, we may need to raise funds to meet our working capital needs. If we require
additional financing, we cannot assure you that additional financing will be available on
acceptable terms or at all. If we issue additional equity securities to raise funds, the ownership
percentage of our existing stockholders would be reduced. New investors may demand rights,
preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of common stock. If we cannot raise
any needed funds, we might be forced to make further substantial reductions in our operating
expenses, which could adversely affect our ability to implement our current business plan and
ultimately our viability as a company.
Net Operating Loss Carryforward
As of December 31, 2010, we had net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state income
tax purposes of approximately $303.1 million and $191.9 million, respectively, which expire in the
years 2011 through 2030. However, during 2010 we concluded that under the Internal Revenue Code
change of control limitations, a maximum of $81.9 million and $55.0 million, respectively, would be
available for reduction of taxable income and reduced both the deferred tax asset and valuation
allowance accordingly. Due to the uncertainty surrounding their realization, we recorded a full
valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets. Accordingly, no deferred tax asset has
been recorded in the accompanying balance sheets.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our historical financial condition and results of operations
are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial
statements in conformity with those principles requires us to make estimates of certain items and
judgments as to certain future events including for example those related to bad debts,
inventories, recovery of long-lived assets (including intangible assets), income taxes, warranty
obligations, and contingencies. These determinations, even though inherently subjective and
subject to change, affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses,
and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. While we believe that our estimates
are based on reasonable assumptions and judgments at the time they are made, some of our
assumptions, estimates and judgments will inevitably prove to be incorrect. As a result, actual
outcomes will likely differ from our accruals, and those differencespositive or negativecould
be material. Some of our accruals are subject to adjustment, as we believe appropriate, based on
revised estimates and reconciliation to the actual results when available.
In addition, we identified certain critical accounting policies which affect certain of our
more significant estimates and assumptions used in preparing our consolidated financial statements
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2010. We have not made any material changes to these
policies.
Backlog
Our commercial backlog consists of accepted product purchase orders with scheduled delivery dates
during the next twelve months. We had commercial backlog of $72,000 at April 2, 2011, compared to
$342,000 at December 31, 2010.
20
Table of Contents
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
We do not believe that there was a material change in our exposure to market risk at April 2,
2011 compared with our market risk exposure on December 31, 2010. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Market Risk in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for 2010.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures. |
We have established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). As of the end of the period
covered by this report we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including the our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective.
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter
ended April 2, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal
controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control
system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are
resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.
Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings. |
From time to time, we are party to various lawsuits, claims and other legal proceedings that
arise in the ordinary course of our business. Excluding ordinary, routine litigation incidental to
our business, we are not currently a party to any legal proceedings that we believe would
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operation or cash flow.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors. |
A description of the risk factors associated with our business is contained in Item 1A, Risk
Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 21, 2011. We are not aware of any material changes to those risk factors.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
The following table summarizes repurchases of our stock in the quarter ended April 2, 2011:
Total Number of Shares | Average Price Paid Per | |||||||
Period | Purchased | Share | ||||||
January 129, 2011 |
166,988 | (1) | $ | 1.60 | ||||
January 30February 26, 2011 |
3,665 | (1) | $ | 2.82 | ||||
February 27April 2, 2011 |
| $ | | |||||
Total |
170,653 | $ | 1.63 | |||||
(1) | Shares surrendered to us by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations that arose upon the vesting of restricted stock awards. These repurchases were not made pursuant to publicly announced plans or programs. |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
None.
Item 4. | Removed and Reserved. |
None.
21
Table of Contents
Item 5. | Other Information. |
None.
Item 6. | Exhibits. |
Number | Description of Document | |||
31.1 | Statement of CEO Pursuant to 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
|||
31.2 | Statement of CFO Pursuant to 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
|||
32.1 | Statement of CEO Pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
|||
32.2 | Statement of CFO Pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
* | Filed herewith. |
22
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES INC. |
||||
Dated: May 9, 2011 | /s/ William J. Buchanan | |||
William J. Buchanan | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
/s/ Jeffrey A. Quiram | ||||
Jeffrey A. Quiram | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
23