Clearfield, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2006 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
Commission
File Number 0-16106
APA
Enterprises, Inc.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota
|
41-1347235
|
|||
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
2950
N.E. 84th
Lane, Blaine, Minnesota 55449
(Address
of principal executive offices and zip code)
(763)
784-4995
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirement
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x
|
No
¨
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, and
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the
Exchange Act).
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated
filer x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
¨
|
No
x
|
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Class:
|
Outstanding
at August 2, 2006
|
|||
Common
stock, par value $.01
|
11,872,331
|
APA
ENTERPRISES, INC.
FORM
10-Q
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
3
|
|
3
|
|
3
|
|
4
|
|
5
|
|
10
|
|
15
|
|
15
|
|
16
|
|
16
|
|
16
|
|
17
|
|
17
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
APA
ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
June
30,
|
March
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2006
|
||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
8,143,946
|
$
|
8,947,777
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts of $75,529
at June
30, 2006 and $77,831 at March 31, 2006
|
2,104,804
|
1,892,483
|
|||||
Inventories
|
2,073,806
|
1,836,843
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
171,492
|
299,425
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
12,494,048
|
12,976,528
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
2,644,810
|
2,623,412
|
|||||
Other
assets:
|
|||||||
Bond
reserve funds
|
339,154
|
343,241
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
3,422,511
|
3,422,511
|
|||||
Other
|
249,621
|
227,879
|
|||||
4,011,286
|
3,993,631
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
19,150,144
|
$
|
19,593,571
|
|||
Liabilities
and shareholders’ equity
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
$
|
1,256,678
|
$
|
1,342,481
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
1,350,776
|
1,353,828
|
|||||
Accrued
compensation
|
620,869
|
815,046
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses
|
150,442
|
211,840
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
3,378,765
|
3,723,195
|
|||||
Long-term
debt, net of current maturities
|
14,796
|
18,480
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
288,634
|
272,454
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
3,682,195
|
4,014,129
|
|||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Undesignated
shares, 4,999,500 authorized shares; no shares issued and
outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value; 500 authorized shares; no shares issued
and
outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 authorized shares; 11,872,331
shares
issued and outstanding at June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006
|
118,723
|
118,723
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
51,987,991
|
51,968,366
|
|||||
Accumulated
foreign currency translation
|
(21,253
|
)
|
(2,153
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(36,617,512
|
)
|
(36,505,494
|
)
|
|||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
15,467,949
|
15,579,442
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$
|
19,150,144
|
$
|
19,593,571
|
SEE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
APA
ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
June
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
5,025,917
|
$
|
3,512,563
|
|||
Cost
of sales
|
3,695,930
|
2,787,453
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
1,329,987
|
725,110
|
|||||
Operating
expenses
|
|||||||
Research
and development
|
153,787
|
323,598
|
|||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
1,713,003
|
1,470,408
|
|||||
Gain
on disposal of asset
|
(345,000
|
)
|
(109,935
|
)
|
|||
1,521,790
|
1,684,071
|
||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(191,803
|
)
|
(958,961
|
)
|
|||
Other
income
|
119,379
|
91,787
|
|||||
Other
expense
|
(20,614
|
)
|
(22,882
|
)
|
|||
98,765
|
68,905
|
||||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
(93,038
|
)
|
(890,056
|
)
|
|||
Income
taxes
|
18,980
|
950
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(112,018
|
)
|
$
|
(891,006
|
)
|
|
Net
loss per share:
|
|||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
$ |
(0.01
|
)
|
$ |
(0.08
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
11,872,331
|
11,872,331
|
SEE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
APA
ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
June
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
Flow from operating activities
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(112,018
|
)
|
$
|
(891,006
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
154,416
|
269,847
|
|||||
Deferred
taxes
|
16,180
|
-
|
|||||
Gain
on sale of assets
|
(345,000
|
)
|
(109,935
|
)
|
|||
Stock
based compensation
|
19,625
|
3,199
|
|||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
(19,100
|
)
|
1,342
|
||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
(212,321
|
)
|
(2,923
|
)
|
|||
Inventories
|
(236,963
|
)
|
(110,977
|
)
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
24,655
|
44,130
|
|||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(258,627
|
)
|
161,503
|
||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(969,153
|
)
|
(634,820
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flow from investing activities
|
|||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(175,814
|
)
|
(121,259
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of assets
|
345,000
|
1,500
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
169,186
|
(119,759
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flow from financing activities
|
|||||||
Repayment
of long-term debt
|
(89,487
|
)
|
(96,624
|
)
|
|||
Decrease
in bond reserve funds
|
85,623
|
89,600
|
|||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(3,864
|
)
|
(7,024
|
)
|
|||
Decrease
in cash and cash equivalents
|
(803,831
|
)
|
(761,603
|
)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
8,947,777
|
10,813,492
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
8,143,946
|
$
|
10,051,889
|
SEE
ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
1. Basis of Presentation
The
accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required
by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
for
complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006.
In
the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain
reclassifications of previously reported amounts have been made to conform
that
presentation to the current period presentation.
In
preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, management is
required to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and related revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results could differ from the estimates used by
management.
Note
2. Net Loss Per Share
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss
per
share:
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
June
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Numerator
for basic and diluted net loss per share
|
$
|
(112,018
|
)
|
$
|
(891,066
|
)
|
|
Denominator
for basic and diluted net loss per share - weighted average shares
outstanding
|
11,872,331
|
11,872,331
|
|||||
Basic
and diluted net loss per share
|
$ |
(0.01
|
)
|
$ |
(0.08
|
)
|
Common
stock options and warrants to purchase 613,980 and 633,940 shares of common
stock with a weighted average exercise price of $2.85 and $6.35 were outstanding
at June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, but were excluded from calculating
diluted net loss per share because they were antidilutive.
Note
3. Segment Reporting
The
Company has identified two reportable segments based on its internal
organizational structure, management of operations, and performance evaluation.
These segments are (1) Optronics and (2) Cables and Networks
(APACN). Optronics’
revenue is generated in the design, manufacture and marketing of ultraviolet
(UV) detection and measurement devices and optical components. Cables &
Networks’ revenue is derived primarily from standard and custom fiber optic
cable assemblies, copper cable assemblies, value added fiber optics frames,
panels and modules. Expenses are allocated between the two segments based
on
detailed information contained in invoices. In addition, overhead costs,
including management’s time and other expenses, are allocated to each segment as
appropriate.
Segment
detail is summarized as follows (unaudited, in thousands):
Optronics
|
Cables
& Networks
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||
Three
months ended June 30, 2006
|
|||||||||||||
External
sales
|
$
|
51
|
$
|
4,975
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
5,026
|
|||||
Gross
profit (loss)
|
(102
|
)
|
1,432
|
-
|
1,330
|
||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
(362
|
)
|
170
|
-
|
(192
|
)
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
87
|
67
|
-
|
154
|
|||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
175
|
1
|
-
|
176
|
|||||||||
Assets
|
18,855
|
8,000
|
(7,705
|
)
|
19,150
|
||||||||
Three
months ended June 30, 2005
|
|||||||||||||
External
sales
|
$
|
103
|
$
|
3,508
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
$
|
3,513
|
||||
Gross
profit (loss)
|
(186
|
)
|
912
|
(1
|
)
|
725
|
|||||||
Operating
loss
|
(891
|
)
|
(68
|
)
|
-
|
(959
|
)
|
||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
210
|
60
|
-
|
270
|
|||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
87
|
34
|
-
|
121
|
|||||||||
Assets
|
21,149
|
7,341
|
(7,358
|
)
|
21,132
|
Note
4. Sale of Land
In
June
2005 the Company sold approximately 2 acres of its land in Aberdeen, South
Dakota to the Aberdeen Development Corporation (ADC) in exchange for the
retirement of its remaining $120,000 debt on its loan with ADC. The land
was
granted to APA in conjunction with building a facility in Aberdeen and was
part
of a single parcel of approximately 12 acres on which the Company constructed
and operates its manufacturing facility. The Company recognized a gain of
approximately $109,000 on the sale of the land in the first quarter of fiscal
2006.
Note
5. Closing of Aberdeen Facility
The
Company ceased all of its operations in Aberdeen during the later part of
fiscal
year 2006 as a part of its consolidation of manufacturing operations. The
Company owned facility, located approximately on a 10-acre parcel, is designated
for lease or sale after sub-division of the land in approximately two 5-acre
parcels. The Company does not have a formal plan for leasing or selling the
facility and thus the building remains classified as property, plant and
equipment as of June 30, 2006. The company plans to retain the 5-acre vacant
land for potential future use. The facility, built using proceeds from a
South
Dakota assisted bond, currently has a long-term debt balance of approximately
$850,000, after adjusting the proceeds from the reserve funds.
Note
6. Sale of Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition (MOCVD) Operation
In
March
2006 the Company sold certain equipment and related intellectual property
related to its MOCVD operations to an unrelated party for a total consideration
of $1.9 million in cash and a license back of the technology within a specified
field of use. The asset purchase agreement includes an additional consulting
agreement for up to $100,000 over the course of one year. The Company recorded
a
gain of approximately $1.2 million on the sale in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2006. The Company does not track discrete financial information for these
assets, therefore this has not been presented as a discontinued operation.
Note
7. Stock Based Compensation
Effective
April 1, 2006, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based
Payment,”
(SFAS
123(R)) which requires an entity to reflect on its income statement, instead
of
pro forma disclosures in its financial footnotes, the cost of employee services
received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date
fair value of the award. Statement 123(R) supersedes the Company’s previous
accounting under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees,” for periods beginning in fiscal 2007.
The
Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method,
which requires the application of the accounting standard as of April 1,
2006,
the first day of the Company’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2007. The Company’s
condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months
ended
June 30, 2006 reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R). In accordance with the modified
prospective transition method, the Company’s consolidated financial statements
for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include,
the
impact of SFAS 123(R). As required by SFAS 123(R), the following pro forma
table
illustrates the effect on net loss as if the fair-value-based approach of
SFAS
No. 123 (R) had been applied during the three months ended June 30, 2005:
Three
Months Ended
|
||||
June
30, 2005
|
||||
Net
loss to common shareholders - as reported
|
$
|
(891,006
|
)
|
|
Less:
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under
fair
value based method for all awards, net of related tax
effects
|
(31,565
|
)
|
||
Net
loss - pro forma
|
$
|
(922,571
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted net loss per common share - as reported
|
$ |
(0.08
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted net loss per common share - pro forma
|
$ |
(0.08
|
)
|
SFAS
123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment
awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the
portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as
expense over the requisite service periods in the Company’s Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The Company recorded $19,625 of related compensation
expense for the three month period ended June 30, 2006. This expense is included
in selling, general and administrative expense. There was no tax benefit
from
recording this non-cash expense. The compensation expense had impacted both
basic and diluted loss per share by $0.01 for the three months ended June
30,
2006. As of June 30, 2006, $117,630 of total unrecognized compensation expense
related to non-vested awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of approximately 3.62 years.
The
Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton (“Black-Scholes”) option-pricing model as
a method for determining the estimated fair value for employee stock awards.
This is the same option-pricing model used in prior years to calculate pro
forma
compensation expense under SFAS 123 footnote disclosures. Compensation expense
for employee stock awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
vesting period of the award. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) also requires certain
changes to the accounting for income taxes and the method used in determining
diluted shares, as well as additional disclosure related to the cash flow
effects resulting from share-based compensation. The relevant interpretive
guidance of Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 was applied in connection with
its
implementation and adoption of SFAS 123(R).
Stock
Option Plans
We
have
adopted a 1997 Stock Compensation Plan, a Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee
Directors, and a 2007 Stock Compensation Plan pending approval of our
shareholders (the Plans), pursuant to which we may grant stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares, and other stock
and
cash awards to eligible participants. We have also granted stock options
outside
of the Plans in limited situations. Under the Plans, an aggregate of
approximately 486,020 shares of our Company’s common stock remained available
for issuance at June 30, 2006. In general, the stock options we have issued
under the Plans vest over a period of five years and expire six years from
the
date of grant. New shares are issued under existing registration statements
upon
exercise. The 1997 Stock Compensation Plan expires on March 4, 2007, which
means
that we cannot grant new awards after that time. All outstanding incentives,
granted under the 1997 Plan will remain in effect until satisfied or
terminated.
Options
transaction under these plans during the three months ended June 30, 2006
are
summarized as follows:
Number of
shares
|
Weighted
average exercise price
|
||||||
Outstanding
at March 31, 2006
|
276,470
|
$
|
2.80
|
||||
Granted
|
25,000
|
1.33
|
|||||
Canceled
|
(37,490
|
)
|
2.87
|
||||
Outstanding
at June 30, 2006
|
263,980
|
2.65
|
The
following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable
stock options at June 30, 2006:
Options
outstanding
|
|||||||||||||
Range
of exercise
prices
|
Number outstanding
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual
life
|
Weighted
average exercise
price
|
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
|
|||||||||
$1.30-$2.91
|
228,980
|
4.29
years
|
$
|
1.88
|
$
|
430,482
|
|||||||
5.53-8.90
|
35,000
|
0.65
years
|
7.70
|
269,500
|
|||||||||
263,980
|
3.81
years
|
2.65
|
$
|
699,982
|
Options
exercisable
|
|||||||||||||
Range
of exercise
prices
|
Number
outstanding
|
Weighted
average remaining
contractual
life
|
Weighted
average exercise
price
|
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
|
|||||||||
$1.30-$2.91
|
67,820
|
3.21
years
|
$
|
2.21
|
$
|
149,882
|
|||||||
5.53-8.90
|
|
31,250
|
0.60
years
|
7.55
|
235,938
|
||||||||
99,070
|
2.39
years
|
3.89
|
$
|
385,820
|
The
Company estimates the fair value of stock option awards based on the following
assumptions:
Three
Months Ended June
30, 2006
|
||||
Expected
volatility
|
64
|
%
|
||
Expected
life (in years)
|
5
years
|
|||
Expected
dividends
|
0
|
%
|
||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
4.95
|
%
|
The
weighted average fair value of options granted during the three months ended
June 30, 2006 was $0.78. The Company’s approach to estimating expected
volatility on its stock awards granted during the quarter considers both
the
historical volatility in the trading market for its common stock and a look
back
period equal to the expected life of the grants. Expected volatility is one
of
several assumptions in the Black-Scholes model used by the Company to make
an
estimate of the fair value of options granted under the Company’s stock plans.
The Company believes this approach results in a better estimate of expected
volatility.
In
estimating the expected term, both exercise behavior and post-vesting
termination behavior were included in the analysis, as well as consideration
of
outstanding options. The risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes
option valuation model is the historical yield on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon
issues with equivalent remaining terms. The Company does not pay any cash
dividends on the Company’s common stock and does not anticipate paying any cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, an expected dividend yield
of
zero is used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model.
Note
8. Major Customer Concentration
As
of
June 30, 2006, one customer comprised approximately 13% of total sales for
the
first quarter ended June 30, 2006 and one customer accounted for 13% of accounts
receivable as of the quarter end. No one customer provided greater than 10%
of
sales for the same period of the prior fiscal year.
Note
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Electronic
Instrumentation and Technology, Inc. ("EIT") filed suit against APA on May
25,
2005 (see information in Part II, Item I of this Report.) The suit alleged
that
APA had committed various fraudulent acts in conjunction with preliminary
business discussions between EIT and APA which preceded APA's introduction
of
its Profiler M product. APA denied EIT's claims of wrongful conduct and
the case went to trial in December 2005. The jury found in favor of EIT on
one
claim and awarded EIT $35,000. EIT filed certain post-trial motions, all
of
which were denied by the court. EIT did not appeal the verdict and this matter
is concluded.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Statements
in this Report about future sales prospects and other matters to occur in
the
future are forward looking statements and are subject to uncertainties due
to
many factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include,
but
are not limited to, the continued development of our products, acceptance
of
those products by potential customers, our ability to sell such products
at a
profitable price, and our ability to fund our operations. For further discussion
regarding these factors, see “Factors That May Influence Future
Results.”
OVERVIEW
APA
Enterprises, Inc., (formerly known as APA Optics, Inc.) consists of the
Optronics group and the Cables & Networks group (APACN or Cables &
Networks). Optronics is active in the development, design, manufacture and
marketing of ultraviolet (UV) measurement instruments for consumers and
industrial customers, and gallium nitride (GaN) based transistors for power
amplifiers and other commercial applications. APACN designs, manufactures
and
markets a variety of fiber optic and copper components for the data
communication and telecommunication industries. Both groups also source
components and devices from third parties for direct and value-added sales
to
our customers in all these technology areas.
APACN
focuses on custom-engineered products for telecommunications customers,
primarily related to cabling management requirements of the Fiber-to-the-Home
(“FTTH”) marketplace and in designing and terminating custom cable assemblies
for commercial and industrial original equipment manufacturers (“OEM’s”). To
date, APACN has been able to successfully establish itself as a value-added
supplier to its target market of independent telephone companies and cable
television operators as well as OEM’s who value a high level of engineering
services as part of their procurement process. APACN has expanded its product
offerings and broadened its customer base since its inception three years
ago.
APACN
also invested in expanding its sales and engineering expenditures by 32%
during
fiscal 2006 to increase its potential revenues during fiscal year 2007 and
beyond. APACN is already realizing the impact of these efforts in terms of
increased sales, particularly during the last two quarters of the fiscal
year
2006 and first quarter of fiscal year 2007. The increase in revenues is due
to
additional customers and product acceptance, mainly in the Fiber-to-the-Premise
market, as well as an increase in revenue generated from a new supply agreement
to an existing customer serving the test equipment market.
Optronics
discontinued the fiber optic product line in March 2006.
In
fiscal
year 2006 we sold our MOCVD facility, certain equipment and intellectual
property related to our research and development work surrounding gallium
nitride based heterojunction field effect transistors. The sale to an unrelated
third party for consideration including $1.9 million in cash enables us to
focus
our R&D efforts on power amplifiers built using GaN technology by using
commercially available parts, rather than building our own transistors. This
is
expected to decrease our operating costs and shorten our time to market for
power amplifiers. The Company also sold certain intellectual capitalized
assets
for $345,000 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2007.
Plastic
and metal models of the consumer Personal UV Monitor (PUVM) offered by Optronics
continue in production, and the focus remains on marketing and sales. We
have
also developed an attractive new clip-on hybrid plastic/metal model that
can be
manufactured to our quality standards by the supplier and have received the
first group of production units for sampling and initial sales. We have also
developed a new product called the SunUVStationTM.
This
product, which is similar in size to an outdoor temperature gauge, measures
the
UV Index and is targeted to consumers and institutions for use in backyards,
patios, swimming pool areas, and other public places where people need to
be
reminded about UV intensity. Final assembly and packaging of this product
is
being performed in our APA facility in India and the production line there
is
now being qualified. The SunUVStationTM
complements the PUVM and retailers are interested in offering both. We have
already started to ship samples of both the SunUVStationTM
and the
PUVM to retail channels.
Optronics’
4-band Profiler
M
radiometer, which serves the printing and coating industries that use UV
curing,
is in production. This instrument measures the intensity and distribution
of
four UV bands to help set up and monitor the curing process. Two domestic
distributors offer the product, and discussions and evaluation tests with
additional domestic and international distributors are underway. We are in
the
process of establishing sales channels through equipment and supplies
manufacturers in addition to general distributors. Optronics is exhibiting
the
Profiler
M
in
selected trade shows with encouraging results. The Redtech show in April
2006
provided more than 75 leads. Additionally, several UV printing system
manufacturers showed interest in introducing and/or marketing the Profiler
M
to their
respective customers.
Our
wholly owned subsidiary, APA Optronics, Pvt. Ltd, India (APA India), established
in fiscal year 2005, is now operational. The subsidiary, with its prime focus
on
low cost manufacturing of our products and components, has already started
supplying samples for our Gallium Nitride and fiber optic products with
expectations for products to be sold in the near future. Additionally, APA
India
is supporting manufacture of various components for APA Cables & Networks.
The subsidiary is also providing software development for our Profiler
M
product.
Phase II of the software for the Profiler has now been completed. The subsidiary
provides marketing and sales support for our products both in the U.S. and
India. In particular, they have now started the marketing of patch cords
and
associated equipment for fiber optic communications. The subsidiary, currently
located in a leased facility, is in the process of constructing a larger
facility in India to accommodate its future requirements. The new facility
is
expected to be completed in calendar year 2006.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 VS. THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2005
Consolidated
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006 increased $1,513,354, or
43%,
to $5,025,917 from $3,512,563 in 2005.
Revenues
at Cables & Networks were $4,975,074, compared to $3,508,388 reported in the
same quarter a year ago, an increase of 42%. The overall increase in revenue
reflects continued growth in new customers and product acceptance in both
the
broadband and OEM markets. Sales for the current quarter to broadband service
providers and commercial data networks were approximately $3,709,000 versus
$2,585,000 in the prior year quarter. The increase was primarily due to higher
revenues from customers in the Fiber-to-the-Premise market. Sales to OEM’s were
approximately $1,266,000 versus $923,000 in the year ago period. The increase
is
due to additional orders provided under a supply contract to a customer serving
the test equipment market. We expect that future sales of Cables & Networks
products will continue to account for a substantial portion of our revenue.
With
the introduction of a broader product offering in both segments, coupled
with
the expansion of the sales team into additional markets, we anticipate that
future revenues at Cables & Networks will be comparable with the revenue of
the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
Gross
revenues at Optronics decreased 50% to $50,843 from $102,898 in the same
quarter
a year ago mainly due to the termination of manufacturing activities in
Aberdeen, South Dakota. Gross revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2005
reflect $98,723 of sales to Cables & Networks for subcontracted labor.
Optronics did not provide any subcontract labor to Cables & Networks in the
quarter ended June 30, 2006.
GROSS
PROFIT AND COST OF SALES
Cables
& Networks’ gross profit increased $520,269, or 57%, to $1,432,209 from
$911,940. The increase in gross profit was mainly due to an increase in revenue
without an increase in the corresponding fixed costs, as well as the continual
pursuit of component and labor cost reductions. Specifically, gross profit
as a
percent of revenue was 29% in the current quarter as compared to 26% in the
same
quarter last year
Gross
cost of sales (before inter-company eliminations) at Optronics decreased
$135,320, or 47%, to $153,065 from $288,385. Gross cost of sales for first
quarter of fiscal year 2006 reflects $97,380 related to cost of sales to
Cables
& Networks for subcontracted labor. Optronics did not provide any
subcontract labor to Cables & Networks in the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
These costs are eliminated as intercompany cost of sales in the consolidated
financials in each quarter. Cost of sales expenses for the current period
for
all Optronics product lines consists of approximately $50,000 in personnel
costs, $33,000 in depreciation and $70,000 in materials, overhead and other
product expenses. This compares to prior year personnel expenses of
approximately $138,000, depreciation of $67,000, and materials, allocated
overhead and other expenses of $83,000. The reduced product development expenses
within the GaN area also contributed to the decreased cost of sales.
We
anticipate comparable gross margins for Cables & Networks and cost of sales
for Optronics for the upcoming quarter.
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
Research
and development expenses consist of the research and development expense
at
Optronics. There have been no significant research and development expenses
at
Cables & Networks. Expenses decreased $169,811 to $153,787, from $323,598 in
the prior year period. The change reflects a decrease in personnel, facility
and
depreciation costs due to the sale of its MOCVD operations.
SELLING,
GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE
Consolidated
selling, general, and administrative (S, G, & A) expenses increased
$242,595, or 16%, to $1,713,003 from $1,470,408 in 2005.
S,
G,
& A expenses at Cables & Networks increased $282,344, or 29%, to
$1,261,892 from $979,548. The majority of the increase is attributable to
additional sales personnel and related selling costs as a part of our plan
to
grow our revenue and customer base. We expect upcoming quarter expenses to
remain at levels seen in the first quarter.
S,
G,
& A expenses at Optronics decreased $41,092, or 8%, to $451,111 from
$492,203. The decrease is due largely to the expensing of warrants in the
prior
quarter which were fully amortized as of March 31, 2006.
GAIN
ON DISPOSAL OF ASSETS
Gain
on
disposal of assets were entirely within the Optronics division. Gain on disposal
of assets increased $235,065 to $345,000 from $109,935 in the prior year.
Gains
for fiscal year 2007 represent the sale of patents. Gains for fiscal year
2006
were primarily from the exchange of land for the forgiveness of
debt.
INCOME
(LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
Consolidated
losses from operations decreased $767,158, or 80%, to $191,803 from $958,961
in
2005.
The
income from operations at Cables & Networks was $170,317 versus loss of
$67,608 in the fiscal 2006 quarter. The
increased income in the quarter was mainly due to increased revenues, offset
by
higher selling expenses absorbed as part of Cables & Networks’ planned
investment in revenue growth.
The
loss
from operations at Optronics decreased $529,233, or 59%, to $362,120, from
a
loss of $891,353 in the year ago period. The decrease in the loss is mainly
due
to the gain of $345,000 realized due to the sale of two patents and the
termination of MOCVD related activities. We expect to incur losses at Optronics
until we realize significant revenues from the sales of our PUVM and GaN
related
products.
OTHER
INCOME AND EXPENSE
Consolidated
other income and expense increased $29,860 to $98,765 from $68,905 in 2005.
Other
expense at Cables & Networks increased $24,773 due to an increase in
interest expense, primarily due to a higher interest rate in the current
period.
Other
income at Optronics increased $53,453 to $230,824. This resulted from an
increase in interest income due to a higher rate of interest earned on
investments over the quarter ending June 30, 2005. Other expense decreased
$1,180 to $20,418, from $21,598 in the period ending June 30, 2005.
NET
LOSS
Consolidated
net loss for the quarter decreased $778,988, or 87%, to $112,018, or $.01
cents
per share, from $891,006, or $.08 cents per share in the year ago
period.
Cables
& Networks had a net profit of $40,696 in the quarter, compared to a loss of
$155,176 in the year ago quarter. The increased profitability was due mainly
to
increased revenues.
Optronics
recorded a net loss of $152,714, a decrease of $583,116 from a loss of $735,830
from the same period of fiscal 2006. The decrease in the loss is mainly due
to
the gain of $345,000 realized due to the sale of two patents and the termination
of MOCVD related activities. Achieving profitability in the future will strongly
depend upon Optronics’ ability to successfully manufacture and market
gallium-nitride products.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The
Company’s cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of money market funds,
U.S. Government instruments and other government instruments with original
maturities of less than three months.
Cash
used
in operating activities was $969,153 for the three month period ended June
30,
2006 compared to $634,820 used in the same period in fiscal 2006. The increase
in the cash used in the current period reflects the impact of working capital
changes from the prior year in the amount of $774,989. This is primarily
attributable to increase in APACN’s accounts receivable and inventory associated
with its growth in revenues.
We
realized net cash increase of $169,186 in investing activities for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $119,759 used in the same period of
the
preceding fiscal year. The net realized cash due to investing activities
in the
current year includes sale of capital assets in the amount of $345,000
offsetting capital expenditures in the amount of $175,814. The Company sold
$1,500 worth of capital assets and had capital expenditures of $121,259 in
the
comparable quarter of the previous year. We anticipate approximately $300,000
to
$500,000 in capital expenditures in fiscal 2007, including the building of
a new
facility in India.
Net
cash
used in financing activities for the three months ended June 30, 2006 totaled
$3,864. We used $89,487 for reduction of debt and generated $85,623 from
the
reduction of bond reserve funds. During the same period in fiscal 2006 we
used
$7,024 in financing activities, of which $96,624 was used for the scheduled
reduction of debt and $89,600 was generated from the reduction of bond reserve
funds.
We
believe we have sufficient funds for operations for at least the next twelve
months.
Our
contractual obligations and commitments are summarized in the table below
(in
000’s):
Total
|
Less
than 1 Year
|
1-3
years
|
4-5
years
|
After
5 years
|
||||||||||||
Long-term
debt (1)
|
$
|
1,272
|
$
|
1,257
|
$
|
15
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Leases
|
2,124
|
223
|
679
|
506
|
716
|
|||||||||||
Total
Contractual Cash Obligations
|
$
|
3,396
|
$
|
1,480
|
$
|
694
|
$
|
506
|
$
|
716
|
(1)
Includes fixed interest from 0.62 to 10.60%
APPLICATION
OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In
preparing our consolidated financial statements, we make estimates, assumptions
and judgments that can have a significant impact on our revenues, loss from
operations and net loss, as well as on the value of certain assets and
liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. We believe that there are
several
accounting policies that are critical to an understanding of our historical
and
future performance, as these policies affect the reported amounts of revenues,
expenses and significant estimates and judgments applied by management. While
there are a number of accounting policies, methods and estimates affecting
our
consolidated financial statements, areas that are particularly significant
include:
·
|
Stock
Option Accounting;
|
·
|
Accounting
for income taxes; and
|
·
|
Valuation
and evaluating impairment of long-lived assets and
goodwill
|
Stock
Option Accounting
In
December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
123—revised 2004 (“SFAS 123R”), “Share-Based Payment,” which replaces Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“SFAS 123”) and supersedes APB
Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS 123R requires
the measurement of all share-based payments to employees, including grants
of
employee stock options, using a fair-value based method and the recording
of
such expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. In March 2005,
the
SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”), “Share-Based Payment,”
which provides interpretive guidance related to the interaction between SFAS
123R and certain SEC rules and regulations, as well as provides the SEC staff’s
views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements.
We
adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method, which
requires the application of the accounting standard as of April 1, 2006,
the
first day of our fiscal year 2007. Our unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2006 reflect
the impact of SFAS 123R. The compensation expense had impacted both basic
and
diluted loss per share by $0.01 for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
The
Company recorded $19,625 of related compensation expense for the three month
period ended June 30, 2006. In accordance with the modified prospective
transition method, our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
for
prior periods have not been restated, and do not include, the impact of
compensation expense calculated under SFAS 123R.
Accounting
for Income Taxes
As
part
of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are
required to estimate our income tax liability in each of the jurisdictions
in
which we do business. This process involves estimating our actual current
tax
expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing
treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result
in
deferred tax assets and liabilities. We must then assess the likelihood that
these deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and,
to
the extent we believe that recovery is not more likely than not or unknown,
we
must establish a valuation allowance.
Significant
management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes,
our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded
against our deferred tax assets. At March 31, 2006, we recorded a full
valuation allowance of $13,390,433 against our deferred tax assets, due to
uncertainties related to our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets,
consisting principally of certain net operating losses carried forward. The
valuation allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income by jurisdiction
and the period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. The
Company has U.S. net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards of approximately
$33,782,000 which expire in fiscal years 2007 to 2026. To
date
the Company has not completed a section 382 analysis. If certain ownership
changes occurred under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, there may
be
further limitations on the usage of the net operating loss carry
forwards.
Realization
of the NOL carryforwards and other deferred tax temporary differences are
contingent on future taxable earnings. The deferred tax asset was reviewed
for
expected utilization using a “more likely than not” approach by assessing the
available positive and negative evidence surrounding its recoverability.
We
will
continue to assess and evaluate strategies that will enable the deferred
tax
asset, or portion thereof, to be utilized, and will reduce the valuation
allowance appropriately at such time when it is determined that the “more likely
than not” approach is satisfied.
Valuation
and evaluating impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill
Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets
acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but reviewed for impairment at the fiscal
year end or whenever conditions exist that indicate an impairment could exist.
The
Company evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets in accordance
with
SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”
SFAS 144 requires recognition of impairment of long-lived assets in the
event that events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred
and
when the net book value of such assets exceeds the future undiscounted cash
flows attributed to such assets. We assess the impairment of long-lived assets
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value
may
not be recoverable. No impairment of long-lived assets has occurred in fiscal
2007 through the three months ended June 30, 2006.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK.
Our
exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to
our
investment portfolio. We invest in short-term securities of high credit issuers
with maturities ranging from overnight up to 24 months. The average maturity
of
the portfolio does not exceed 12 months. The portfolio includes only marketable
securities with active secondary or resale markets to ensure liquidity. We
have
no investments denominated in foreign country currencies and, therefore,
our
investments are not subject to foreign exchange risk.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a)
|
Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures.
The Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have
concluded that as of the end of the fiscal period covered by this
report
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 13a-14(c)) were effective.
|
(b)
|
Changes
in internal controls.
There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial
reporting during the fiscal period covered by this report that
materially
affected, or are likely to materially affect, the Company’s control over
financial reporting.
|
PART
II
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Electronic
Instrumentation and Technology, Inc. ("EIT") filed suit against APA on May
25,
2005 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Case
Number 1:05 CV 571 (the "EIT litigation"), alleging that APA had committed
fraud
by knowing concealment, fraud in making contract, fraud by intentional
misrepresentation, misappropriation of trade secrets, tortious interference
with
prospective economic advantage, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract,
unfair competition, and inequitable conduct in conjunction with preliminary
business discussions between EIT and APA which preceded APA's introduction
of
the Profiler M. APA filed an Answer on July 28, 2005, which denied EIT's
claims of wrongful conduct.
The
EIT
litigation was tried to a jury on December 28, 2005. The District Court
dismissed, as a matter of law, six of EIT's nine causes of action either
before
or during the trial. Three of EIT's causes of action were submitted to the
jury for determination. The jury found in favor of APA on EIT's claim for
fraud in making contract and misappropriation of trade secrets. The jury
found
in favor of EIT on its breach of contract claim and awarded EIT $35,000.
EIT has
filed certain post-trial motions, all of which were denied by the court.
EIT did
not appeal the verdict and this matter is concluded.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
FACTORS
THAT MAY INFLUENCE FUTURE RESULTS
The
statements contained in this Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical
are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933
and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, without
limitations, statements regarding the Company’s expectations, hopes, beliefs,
anticipations, commitments, intentions and strategies regarding the future.
Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements contained
in “Item 1. Business” and “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended March 31, 2006. Actual results could differ from those projected
in any forward-looking statements for the reasons, among others, detailed
below.
We believe that many of the risks detailed here are part of doing business
in
the industry in which we compete and will likely be present in all periods
reported. The fact that certain risks are characteristic to the industry
does
not lessen the significance of the risk. The forward-looking statements are
made
as of the date of this Report as Form 10-Q and we assume no obligation to
update
the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results
could
differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements.
Manufacturing
and Operations
We
are dependent upon skilled employees; if we lose the services of our key
personnel our ability to execute our operating plan, and our operating results,
may suffer.
Our
future performance depends in part upon the continued service and contributions
of key management, engineering, sales and marketing personnel, many of whom
would be difficult to replace quickly. If we lose any of these key personnel,
our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially
adversely affected or delay the development or marketing of existing or future
products. Competition for these personnel is intense and we may not be able
to
retain or attract such personnel. Our success will depend in part upon our
ability to attract and retain additional personnel with the highly specialized
expertise necessary to generate revenue and to engineer, design and support
our
products and services. We have recently lost two management level advanced
degree employees. Currently, these responsibilities have been absorbed by
existing employees.
Markets
and Market Conditions
Our
profitability can be adversely affected due to increased raw material
costs
Our
manufacturing costs may be impacted by un-anticipated increase in raw material
costs during the time span between the cost quotes and actual procurement
of raw
materials. The impact can be significant for purchase orders requiring multiple
scheduled deliveries. Whereas we may be able to approach some of the customers
for costs adjustments, there is no assurance that we would be successful
in
obtaining these adjustments, resulting in decreased profitability and/or
losses.
Our
inventory of raw material and supplies may incur significant obsolescence
Our
market demands rapid turn around from receipt of purchase orders to shipping
of
the products. We maintain significant inventory of raw materials and supplies
to
meet this demand resulting in risk of inventory obsolescence. Whereas we
anticipate and make provisions for a reasonable fraction of inventory
obsolescence, a significant higher level of obsolescence can adversely impact
our profitability.
Our
Customers
Our
sales could be negatively impacted if one or more of our key customers
substantially reduce orders for our products.
If
we
lose a significant customer, our sales and gross margins would be negatively
impacted. In addition, the loss of sales may require us to record impairment,
restructuring charges or exit a particular business or product line. As of
June
30, 2006, one customer comprised approximately 13% of total sales for the
first
quarter ended June 30, 2006 and one customer accounted for 13% of accounts
receivable as of the quarter end. No one customer provided greater than 10%
of
sales for the same period of the prior fiscal year.
ITEMS
2 THROUGH 5. NOT APPLICABLE
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit
31.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of
2002
Exhibit
32.1 - Certification required of Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of
2002
Signatures
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
APA
ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
||
8/10/06
|
/s/
Anil K. Jain
|
|
Date
|
Anil
K. Jain
|
|
President,
|
||
Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive
and
Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
18