Annual Statements Open main menu
  1. Annual Statements
  2. » Companies
  3. » CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC.
  4. » Quarter Report: 2015 September (Form 10-Q)

CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC. - Quarter Report: 2015 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from              to             .
Commission File Number: 1-8944
CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Ohio
 
34-1464672
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
200 Public Square, Cleveland, Ohio
 
44114-2315
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (216) 694-5700
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES  x                                         NO  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES  x                                         NO  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer  x             Accelerated filer  o    Non-accelerated filer   o    Smaller reporting company  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES  o                                         NO  x
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common shares, par value $0.125 per share, was 153,422,672 as of October 26, 2015.


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Page Number
 
 
 
 
 
 
DEFINITIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
Financial Statements
 
 
 
 
 
Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
 
 
 
 
Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
 
 
 
 
Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
 
 
 
 
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 
 
Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
 
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
 
 
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
 
 
 
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
 
 
 
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
 
 
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
 
 
 
Item 6.
Exhibits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Signatures
 
 
 
 
 
 

Table of Contents


DEFINITIONS
The following abbreviations or acronyms are used in the text. References in this report to the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “Cliffs” are to Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. and subsidiaries, collectively. References to “A$” or “AUD” refer to Australian currency, “C$” or "CAD" to Canadian currency and “$” to United States currency.
Abbreviation or acronym
 
Term
ABL Facility
 
Syndicated Facility Agreement by and among Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Australian Security Trustee, the Lenders that are parties hereto, Cliffs Natural Resources Inc., as Parent and a Borrower, and the Subsidiaries of Parent party hereto, as Borrowers dated as of March 30, 2015
ArcelorMittal
 
ArcelorMittal (as the parent company of ArcelorMittal Mines Canada, ArcelorMittal USA and ArcelorMittal Dofasco, as well as, many other subsidiaries)
ASC
 
Accounting Standards Codification
ASU
 
Accounting Standards Updates
BAML
 
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Bloom Lake
 
The Bloom Lake Iron Ore Mine Limited Partnership
Bloom Lake Group
 
Bloom Lake General Partner Limited and certain of its affiliates, including Cliffs Quebec Iron Mining ULC
Canadian Entities
 
Bloom Lake Group, Wabush Group and certain other wholly-owned Canadian subsidiaries
CCAA
 
Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada)
CEO
 
Chief Executive Officer
CFR
 
Cost and freight
Chromite Project
 
Cliffs Chromite Ontario Inc.
CLCC
 
Cliffs Logan County Coal LLC
CODM
 
Chief Operating Decision Maker
Dodd-Frank Act
 
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
DR-pellets
 
Direct Reduction pellets
EAF
 
Electric Arc Furnace
EBITDA
 
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
Empire
 
Empire Iron Mining Partnership
Essar Algoma
 
Essar Steel Algoma Inc.
Exchange Act
 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
FASB
 
Financial Accounting Standards Board
Fe
 
Iron
FERC
 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FMSH Act
 
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
GAAP
 
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
Hibbing
 
Hibbing Taconite Company
Koolyanobbing
 
Collective term for the operating deposits at Koolyanobbing, Mount Jackson and Windarling
LIBOR
 
London Interbank Offered Rate
LTVSMC
 
LTV Steel Mining Company
MISO
 
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
MMBtu
 
Million British Thermal Units
Monitor
 
FTI Consulting Canada Inc.
Moody's
 
Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a subsidiary of Moody's Corporation, and its successors
MSHA
 
U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration
Northshore
 
Northshore Mining Company
Oak Grove
 
Oak Grove Resources, LLC
OCI
 
Other comprehensive income (loss)
OPEB
 
Other postretirement employment benefits
Pinnacle
 
Pinnacle Mining Company, LLC
Preferred Share
 
7.00 percent Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Class A, without par value
S&P
 
Standard & Poor's Rating Services, a division of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC, a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and its successors
SEC
 
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SSR
 
System Support Resource
Securities Act
 
Securities Act of 1933
Substitute Rating Agency
 
A "nationally recognized statistical rating organization" within the meaning of Section 3(a)(62) of the Exchange Act, selected by us (as certified by a certificate of officers confirming the decision of our Board of Directors) as a replacement agency of Moody's or S&P, or both of them, as the case may be
Tilden
 
Tilden Mining Company
TSR
 
Total Shareholder Return
United Taconite
 
United Taconite LLC

1
Table of Contents


U.S.
 
United States of America
USW
 
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Wabush
 
Wabush Mines Joint Venture
Wabush Group
 
Wabush Iron Co. Limited and Wabush Resources Inc., and certain of its affiliates, including Wabush Mines (an unincorporated joint venture of Wabush Iron Co. Limited and Wabush Resources Inc.), Arnaud Railway Company and Wabush Lake Railway Company
2012 Equity Plan
 
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. 2012 Incentive Equity Plan
2012 Amended Equity Plan
 
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Incentive Equity Plan
2015 Equity Plan
 
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. 2015 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan

2
Table of Contents


PART I
Item 1.
Financial Statements
Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
(In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
REVENUES FROM PRODUCT SALES AND SERVICES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product
$
542.5

 
$
901.9

 
$
1,399.9

 
$
2,161.7

Freight and venture partners' cost reimbursements
50.7

 
77.8

 
137.4

 
181.2


593.2

 
979.7

 
1,537.3

 
2,342.9

COST OF GOODS SOLD AND OPERATING EXPENSES
(538.1
)
 
(723.5
)
 
(1,344.1
)
 
(1,713.2
)
SALES MARGIN
55.1

 
256.2

 
193.2

 
629.7

OTHER OPERATING INCOME (EXPENSE)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(22.4
)
 
(49.7
)
 
(82.2
)
 
(131.1
)
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
—

 
(377.0
)
 
(3.3
)
 
(378.6
)
Miscellaneous - net
(3.5
)
 
27.7

 
19.1

 
15.7

 
(25.9
)
 
(399.0
)
 
(66.4
)
 
(494.0
)
OPERATING INCOME (EXPENSE)
29.2

 
(142.8
)
 
126.8

 
135.7

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense, net
(61.7
)
 
(45.8
)
 
(168.2
)
 
(128.3
)
Gain on extinguishment of debt
79.2

 
—

 
392.9

 
—

Other non-operating income (expense)
(0.1
)
 
7.7

 
(3.0
)
 
10.1

 
17.4

 
(38.1
)
 
221.7

 
(118.2
)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY LOSS FROM VENTURES
46.6

 
(180.9
)
 
348.5

 
17.5

INCOME TAX BENEFIT (EXPENSE)
3.4

 
(84.1
)
 
(169.9
)
 
(121.3
)
EQUITY LOSS FROM VENTURES, NET OF TAX
(0.1
)
 
(9.2
)
 
(0.1
)
 
(9.8
)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
49.9

 
(274.2
)
 
178.5

 
(113.6
)
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX
(43.9
)
 
(6,613.0
)
 
(869.0
)
 
(6,829.8
)
NET INCOME (LOSS)
6.0

 
(6,887.2
)
 
(690.5
)
 
(6,943.4
)
LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
4.6

 
1,007.6

 
1.5

 
1,004.4

(Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 - No loss related to Discontinued Operations, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 - Loss of $7.7 million related to Discontinued Operations, Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 - Loss of $1,010.1 million and $1,026.8 million, respectively, related to Discontinued Operations)
 
 
 
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CLIFFS SHAREHOLDERS
$
10.6

 
$
(5,879.6
)
 
$
(689.0
)
 
$
(5,939.0
)
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
(25.6
)
 
(12.8
)
 
(38.4
)
 
(38.4
)
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CLIFFS COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
$
(15.0
)
 
$
(5,892.4
)
 
$
(727.4
)
 
$
(5,977.4
)
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CLIFFS SHAREHOLDERS - BASIC
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
0.19

 
$
(1.89
)
 
$
0.87

 
$
(1.14
)
Discontinued operations
(0.29
)
 
(36.60
)
 
(5.62
)
 
(37.91
)
 
$
(0.10
)
 
$
(38.49
)
 
$
(4.75
)
 
$
(39.05
)
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CLIFFS SHAREHOLDERS - DILUTED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
0.19

 
$
(1.89
)
 
$
0.87

 
$
(1.14
)
Discontinued operations
(0.29
)
 
(36.60
)
 
(5.62
)
 
(37.91
)
 
$
(0.10
)
 
$
(38.49
)
 
$
(4.75
)
 
$
(39.05
)
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES (IN THOUSANDS)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
153,237

 
153,108

 
153,213

 
153,085

Diluted
153,237

 
153,108

 
153,213

 
153,085

CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER DEPOSITARY SHARE
$
0.88

 
$
0.44

 
$
1.32

 
$
1.32

CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE
$
—

 
$
0.15

 
$
—

 
$
0.45

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3
Table of Contents


Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Comprehensive Income
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
(In Millions)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CLIFFS SHAREHOLDERS
$
10.6

 
$
(5,879.6
)
 
$
(689.0
)
 
$
(5,939.0
)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in pension and other post-retirement benefits, net of tax
6.6

 
11.6

 
36.0

 
18.2

Unrealized net gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax
0.1

 
(5.8
)
 
1.6

 
(5.6
)
Unrealized net gain (loss) on foreign currency translation
(11.4
)
 
(65.9
)
 
157.1

 
(5.7
)
Unrealized net gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments, net of tax
9.2

 
(20.6
)
 
16.7

 
6.2

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
4.5

 
(80.7
)
 
211.4

 
13.1

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (INCOME) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
(0.7
)
 
(0.5
)
 
9.3

 
(1.6
)
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CLIFFS SHAREHOLDERS
$
14.4

 
$
(5,960.8
)
 
$
(468.3
)
 
$
(5,927.5
)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4
Table of Contents


Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
(In Millions)
 
September 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
ASSETS
 
 
 
CURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
270.2

 
$
271.3

Accounts receivable, net
53.4

 
122.7

Inventories
351.7

 
260.1

Supplies and other inventories
118.0

 
118.6

Income tax receivable
3.1

 
217.6

Short-term assets of discontinued operations
141.4

 
330.6

Other current assets
138.1

 
128.0

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
1,075.9

 
1,448.9

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
1,052.6

 
1,070.5

OTHER ASSETS
 
 
 
Long-term assets of discontinued operations
—

 
400.1

Other non-current assets
143.0

 
244.5

TOTAL OTHER ASSETS
143.0

 
644.6

TOTAL ASSETS
$
2,271.5

 
$
3,164.0

(continued)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5
Table of Contents


Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. and Subsidiaries - (Continued)
 
(In Millions)
 
September 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
LIABILITIES
 
 
 
CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
102.3

 
$
166.1

Accrued expenses
149.8

 
201.7

Short-term liabilities of discontinued operations
182.2

 
400.6

Other current liabilities
235.6

 
190.2

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
669.9

 
958.6

PENSION AND POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT LIABILITIES
209.1

 
259.7

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MINE CLOSURE OBLIGATIONS
211.9

 
165.6

LONG-TERM DEBT
2,721.6

 
2,843.3

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
—

 
436.1

OTHER LIABILITIES
218.5

 
235.0

TOTAL LIABILITIES
4,031.0

 
4,898.3

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (SEE NOTE 20)

 

EQUITY
 
 
 
CLIFFS SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
 
 
 
Preferred Stock - no par value
 
 
 
Class A - 3,000,000 shares authorized
 
 
 
7% Series A Mandatory Convertible, Class A, no par value and $1,000 per share liquidation preference
 
 
 
Issued and Outstanding - 731,223 shares (2014 - 731,223 shares)
731.3

 
731.3

Class B - 4,000,000 shares authorized
 
 
 
Common Shares - par value $0.125 per share
 
 
 
Authorized - 400,000,000 shares (2014 - 400,000,000 shares);
 
 
 
Issued - 159,546,224 shares (2014 - 159,546,224 shares);
 
 
 
Outstanding - 153,404,664 shares (2014 - 153,246,754 shares)
19.8

 
19.8

Capital in excess of par value of shares
2,307.6

 
2,309.8

Retained deficit
(4,688.1
)
 
(3,960.7
)
Cost of 6,141,560 common shares in treasury (2014 - 6,299,470 shares)
(277.5
)
 
(285.7
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(25.1
)
 
(245.8
)
TOTAL CLIFFS SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
(1,932.0
)
 
(1,431.3
)
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST (DEFICIT)
172.5

 
(303.0
)
TOTAL DEFICIT
(1,759.5
)
 
(1,734.3
)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND DEFICIT
$
2,271.5

 
$
3,164.0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6
Table of Contents


Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
(In Millions)
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(690.5
)
 
$
(6,943.4
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
99.1

 
430.4

Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
76.6

 
7,773.1

Deferred income taxes
160.0

 
(1,080.7
)
Gain on extinguishment of debt
(392.9
)
 
—

Loss on deconsolidation, net of cash deconsolidated
654.8

 
—

Other
52.7

 
(22.6
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Receivables and other assets
293.1

 
98.9

Product inventories
(76.2
)
 
(129.2
)
Payables, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
(236.2
)
 
(22.5
)
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
(59.5
)
 
104.0

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
(57.9
)
 
(233.2
)
Other investing activities
0.7

 
25.3

Net cash used by investing activities
(57.2
)
 
(207.9
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Proceeds from first lien notes offering
503.5

 
—

Debt issuance costs
(33.6
)
 
(2.1
)
Repurchase of debt
(225.9
)
 
—

Borrowings under credit facilities
309.8

 
918.5

Repayment under credit facilities
(309.8
)
 
(705.1
)
Repayment of equipment loans
(36.9
)
 
(15.7
)
Distributions of partnership equity
(31.7
)
 
—

Common stock dividends
—

 
(69.5
)
Preferred stock dividends
(38.4
)
 
(38.4
)
Other financing activities
(38.8
)
 
(70.3
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
98.2

 
17.4

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH
(2.2
)
 
(5.0
)
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(20.7
)
 
(91.5
)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
290.9

 
335.5

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
$
270.2

 
$
244.0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
See NOTE 17 - CASH FLOW INFORMATION.

7
Table of Contents


Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with SEC rules and regulations and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly, the financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows for the periods presented. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Management bases its estimates on various assumptions and historical experience, which are believed to be reasonable; however, due to the inherent nature of estimates, actual results may differ significantly due to changed conditions or assumptions. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015 or any other future period. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
As more fully described in NOTE 14 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, in January 2015, we announced that the Bloom Lake Group commenced restructuring proceedings in Montreal, Quebec under the CCAA. At that time, we had recently suspended Bloom Lake operations and for several months had been exploring options to sell certain of our Canadian assets, among other initiatives. Effective January 27, 2015, following the CCAA filing of the Bloom Lake Group, we deconsolidated the Bloom Lake Group and certain other wholly-owned subsidiaries comprising substantially all of our Canadian operations. Additionally, on May 20, 2015, the Wabush Group commenced restructuring proceedings in Montreal, Quebec under the CCAA which resulted in the deconsolidation of the remaining Wabush Group entities that were not previously deconsolidated. The Wabush Group was no longer generating revenues and was not able to meet its obligations as they came due. As a result of this action, the CCAA protections granted to the Bloom Lake Group were extended to include the Wabush Group to facilitate the reorganization of each of their businesses and operations. Financial results prior to the respective deconsolidations of the Bloom Lake and Wabush Groups and subsequent expenses directly associated with the Canadian Entities are included in our financial statements and classified within discontinued operations.
Additionally, as we continue to re-focus our strategy on strengthening our U.S. Iron Ore operations, management determined that our North American Coal operating segment as of the period ended March 31, 2015 met the criteria to be classified as held for sale under ASC 205 - Presentation of Financial Statements. As such, all current and historical North American Coal operating segment results are included in our financial statements and classified within discontinued operations.
We now report our results from continuing operations in two reportable segments: U.S. Iron Ore and Asia Pacific Iron Ore.

8
Table of Contents


Basis of Consolidation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, including the following operations as of September 30, 2015:
Name
 
Location
 
Ownership Interest
 
Operation
 
Status of Operations
Northshore
 
Minnesota
 
100.0%
 
Iron Ore
 
Active
United Taconite
 
Minnesota
 
100.0%
 
Iron Ore
 
Active
Tilden
 
Michigan
 
85.0%
 
Iron Ore
 
Active
Empire
 
Michigan
 
79.0%
 
Iron Ore
 
Active
Koolyanobbing
 
Western Australia
 
100.0%
 
Iron Ore
 
Active
Pinnacle
 
West Virginia
 
100.0%
 
Coal
 
Active - Held for Sale
Oak Grove
 
Alabama
 
100.0%
 
Coal
 
Active - Held for Sale
Wabush1
 
Newfoundland and Labrador/ Quebec, Canada
 
100.0%
 
Iron Ore
 
Permanent closure
Bloom Lake1
 
Quebec, Canada
 
82.8%
 
Iron Ore
 
Care-and-maintenance
1 As of January 27, 2015 and May 20, 2015, we deconsolidated substantially all of our Canadian operations following the CCAA filing. See NOTE 14 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS for further information.
Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated upon consolidation.
Equity Method Investments
Investments in unconsolidated ventures that we have the ability to exercise significant influence over, but not control, are accounted for under the equity method. The following table presents the detail of our investments in unconsolidated ventures and where those investments are classified in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(In Millions)
Investment
 
Classification
 
Accounting
Method
 
Interest
Percentage
 
September 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Hibbing
 
Other non-current assets
 
Equity Method
 
23%
 
$
2.1

 
$
3.1

Other
 
Other non-current assets
 
Equity Method
 
Various
 
1.1

 
1.0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
3.2

 
$
4.1


9
Table of Contents


Foreign Currency
Our financial statements are prepared with the U.S. dollar as the reporting currency. The functional currency of our Australian subsidiaries is the Australian dollar. The functional currency of all other international subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. The financial statements of international subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate at each balance sheet date for assets and liabilities and a weighted average exchange rate for each period for revenues, expenses, gains and losses. Where the local currency is the functional currency, translation adjustments are recorded as Accumulated other comprehensive loss. Income taxes generally are not provided for foreign currency translation adjustments. To the extent that monetary assets and liabilities, inclusive of intercompany notes, are recorded in a currency other than the functional currency, these amounts are remeasured each reporting period, with the resulting gain or loss being recorded in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations. Transaction gains and losses resulting from remeasurement of short-term intercompany loans are included in Miscellaneous - net in our Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, net gains of $2.4 million and $15.2 million, respectively, related to the impact of transaction gains and losses resulting from remeasurement. Of these amounts, for the three months ended September 30, 2015, gains of $0.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, gains of $11.1 million and $2.0 million, respectively, resulted from remeasurement of short-term intercompany loans and cash and cash equivalents. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, net gains of $25.8 million and $8.4 million, respectively, related to the impact of transaction gains and losses resulting from remeasurement. Of these transaction gains and losses, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, gains of $17.7 million and $9.6 million, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, gains of $4.7 million and $4.5 million, respectively, resulted from remeasurement of short-term intercompany loans and cash and cash equivalents.
Significant Accounting Policies
A detailed description of our significant accounting policies can be found in the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. The significant accounting policies requiring updates have been included within the disclosures below.
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
According to our global hedge policy, the policy allows for hedging not more than 75 percent, but not less than 40 percent for up to 12 months and not less than 10 percent for up to 15 months, of forecasted net currency exposures that are probable to occur. Full hedge compliance under the policy has been waived through December 31, 2015. The waiver was a result of the evaluation of the potential risk of being over hedged and the uncertainty of the 2015 currency exposures. During 2015, we have not entered into any new foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge our foreign currency exposure and we do not expect to enter into any during the remainder of 2015. In the future, we may enter into additional hedging instruments as needed in order to further hedge our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Issued and Not Effective
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which specifies that an entity should measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The new standard does not apply to inventory that is measured using LIFO; therefore, it is not applicable to our U.S. Iron Ore inventory values, but does apply to our Asia Pacific Iron Ore inventories which are valued using the average cost method. The update is effective for financial statement periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments in ASU 2015-11 should be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. We do not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to have an impact on our financial statements and related disclosures.    
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. This ASU requires retrospective adoption and will be effective for us beginning in our first quarter of 2016. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect this adoption to have an impact on our Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations or Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows.  The impact of the adoption of the guidance will result in reclassification of the unamortized debt issuance costs on the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position, which were $40.1 million and $25.6 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

10
Table of Contents


In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenues from Contracts with Customers. The new revenue guidance broadly replaces the revenue guidance provided throughout the Codification.  The core principle of the revenue guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.  The new revenue guidance also requires the capitalization of certain contract acquisition costs.  Reporting entities must prepare new disclosures providing qualitative and quantitative information on the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.  New disclosures also include qualitative and quantitative information on significant judgments, changes in judgments, and contract acquisition assets. At issuance, ASU 2014-09 was effective starting in 2017 for calendar-year public entities, and interim periods within that year. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date, which defers the adoption of ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. We are still evaluating the impact of the updated guidance on the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position, Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations or Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows.
NOTE 2 - SEGMENT REPORTING
Our continuing operations are organized and managed according to product category and geographic location: U.S. Iron Ore and Asia Pacific Iron Ore. The U.S. Iron Ore segment is comprised of our interests in five U.S. mines that provide iron ore to the integrated steel industry. The Asia Pacific Iron Ore segment is located in Western Australia and provides iron ore to the seaborne market for Asian steel producers. There were no intersegment product revenues in the first nine months of 2015 or 2014.
We have historically evaluated segment performance based on sales margin, defined as revenues less cost of goods sold, and operating expenses identifiable to each segment. Additionally, beginning in the third quarter of 2014, concurrent with the change in control on July 29, 2014, management began to evaluate segment performance based on EBITDA, defined as net income (loss) before interest, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, and Adjusted EBITDA, defined as EBITDA excluding certain items such as impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets, impacts of discontinued operations, extinguishment of debt, severance and contractor termination costs, foreign currency remeasurement, and intersegment corporate allocations of selling, general and administrative costs. Management uses and believes that investors benefit from referring to these measures in evaluating operating and financial results, as well as in planning, forecasting and analyzing future periods as these financial measures approximate the cash flows associated with the operational earnings.

11
Table of Contents


The following tables present a summary of our reportable segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, including a reconciliation of segment sales margin to Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Equity Loss from Ventures and a reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:
 
(In Millions)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Revenues from product sales and services:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Iron Ore
$
471.0

 
79
%
 
$
767.4

 
78
%
 
$
1,152.5

 
75
%
 
$
1,643.3

 
70
%
Asia Pacific Iron Ore
122.2

 
21
%
 
212.3

 
22
%
 
384.8

 
25
%
 
699.6

 
30
%
Total revenues from product sales and services
$
593.2

 
100
%
 
$
979.7

 
100
%
 
$
1,537.3

 
100
%
 
$
2,342.9

 
100
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales margin:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Iron Ore
$
48.7

 
 
 
$
219.5

 
 
 
$
177.7

 
 
 
$
461.7

 
 
Asia Pacific Iron Ore
6.4

 
 
 
9.1

 
 
 
15.5

 
 
 
111.4

 
 
Eliminations with discontinued operations
—

 
 
 
27.6

 
 
 
—

 
 
 
56.6

 
 
Sales margin
55.1

 
 
 
256.2

 
 
 
193.2

 
 
 
629.7

 
 
Other operating expense
(25.9
)
 
 
 
(399.0
)
 
 
 
(66.4
)
 
 
 
(494.0
)
 
 
Other income (expense)
17.4

 
 
 
(38.1
)
 
 
 
221.7

 
 
 
(118.2
)
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity loss from ventures
$
46.6

 
 
 
$
(180.9
)
 
 
 
$
348.5

 
 
 
$
17.5

 
 

12
Table of Contents


 
(In Millions)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Net Income (Loss)
$
6.0

 
$
(6,887.2
)
 
$
(690.5
)
 
$
(6,943.4
)
Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense, net
(62.3
)
 
(47.4
)
 
(170.7
)
 
(134.9
)
Income tax benefit (expense)
4.8

 
921.4

 
(167.3
)
 
1,012.3

Depreciation, depletion and amortization
(35.6
)
 
(144.0
)
 
(99.1
)
 
(430.4
)
EBITDA
$
99.1

 
$
(7,617.2
)
 
$
(253.4
)
 
$
(7,390.4
)
Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
$
—


$
(377.0
)

$
(3.3
)

$
(378.6
)
Impact of discontinued operations
(44.8
)
 
(7,543.0
)
 
(865.9
)
 
(7,737.1
)
Gain on extinguishment of debt
79.2

 
—

 
392.9

 
—

Severance and contractor termination costs
2.2

 
(2.6
)
 
(9.3
)
 
(19.3
)
Foreign exchange remeasurement
2.4

 
25.8

 
15.2

 
8.4

Adjusted EBITDA
$
60.1

 
$
279.6

 
$
217.0

 
$
736.2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EBITDA:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Iron Ore
$
69.2

 
$
241.9

 
$
239.6

 
$
538.2

Asia Pacific Iron Ore
11.1

 
(302.2
)
 
38.7

 
(150.8
)
Other
18.8

 
(7,556.9
)
 
(531.7
)
 
(7,777.8
)
Total EBITDA
$
99.1

 
$
(7,617.2
)
 
$
(253.4
)
 
$
(7,390.4
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Iron Ore
$
72.3

 
$
249.5

 
$
254.6

 
$
559.1

Asia Pacific Iron Ore
9.7

 
49.7

 
32.8

 
225.5

Other
(21.9
)
 
(19.6
)
 
(70.4
)
 
(48.4
)
Total Adjusted EBITDA
$
60.1

 
$
279.6

 
$
217.0

 
$
736.2

 
(In Millions)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Iron Ore
$
27.9

 
$
25.9

 
$
71.6

 
$
81.2

Asia Pacific Iron Ore
6.1

 
42.2

 
19.1

 
123.6

Other
1.6

 
2.0

 
5.2

 
5.9

Total depreciation, depletion and amortization
$
35.6

 
$
70.1

 
$
95.9

 
$
210.7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital additions1:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Iron Ore
$
15.0

 
$
8.5

 
$
35.8

 
$
37.4

Asia Pacific Iron Ore
0.3

 
3.1

 
4.8

 
8.3

Other
2.4

 
0.5

 
6.0

 
3.3

Total capital additions
$
17.7

 
$
12.1

 
$
46.6

 
$
49.0

                                         
1    Includes capital lease additions and non-cash accruals. Refer to NOTE 17 - CASH FLOW INFORMATION.

13
Table of Contents


A summary of assets by segment is as follows:
 
(In Millions)
 
September 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Assets:
 
 
 
U.S. Iron Ore
$
1,498.3

 
$
1,464.9

Asia Pacific Iron Ore
210.5

 
274.6

Other
26.3

 
147.0

Total segment assets
1,735.1

 
1,886.5

Corporate
395.0

 
546.8

Assets of Discontinued Operations
141.4

 
730.7

Total assets
$
2,271.5

 
$
3,164.0

NOTE 3 - INVENTORIES
The following table presents the detail of our Inventories in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Segment
Finished Goods
 
Work-in Process
 
Total Inventory
 
Finished Goods
 
Work-in
Process
 
Total
Inventory
U.S. Iron Ore
$
260.3

 
$
23.3

 
$
283.6

 
$
132.1

 
$
13.5

 
$
145.6

Asia Pacific Iron Ore
18.5

 
49.6

 
68.1

 
26.4

 
88.1

 
114.5

Total
$
278.8

 
$
72.9

 
$
351.7

 
$
158.5

 
$
101.6

 
$
260.1

Asia Pacific Iron Ore had long-term work-in-process stockpiles of $12.0 million classified as Other non-current assets in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position at September 30, 2015. There were no long-term work-in-process stockpiles as of December 31, 2014.
NOTE 4 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The following table indicates the value of each of the major classes of our consolidated depreciable assets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
September 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Land rights and mineral rights
$
500.6

 
$
500.5

Office and information technology
68.5

 
73.7

Buildings
60.1

 
59.8

Mining equipment
583.8

 
585.1

Processing equipment
514.4

 
510.2

Electric power facilities
46.4

 
46.8

Land improvements
24.8

 
24.7

Other
99.8

 
55.0

Construction in-progress
34.5

 
14.4

 
1,932.9

 
1,870.2

Allowance for depreciation and depletion
(880.3
)
 
(799.7
)
 
$
1,052.6

 
$
1,070.5


14
Table of Contents


We recorded depreciation and depletion expense related to our continuing operations of $34.6 million and $92.8 million in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. This compares with depreciation and depletion expense related to our continuing operations of $67.7 million and $203.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.
NOTE 5 - DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
The following represents a summary of our long-term debt as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
($ in Millions)
 
September 30, 2015
 
Debt Instrument
 
Type
 
Annual Effective Interest Rate
 
Final Maturity
 
Total Face Amount
 
Total Debt
 
$700 Million 4.875% 2021 Senior Notes
 
Fixed
 
4.89%
 
2021
 
$
412.5

 
$
412.3

(1)
$1.3 Billion Senior Notes:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$500 Million 4.80% 2020 Senior Notes
 
Fixed
 
4.83%
 
2020
 
306.7

 
306.3

(2)
$800 Million 6.25% 2040 Senior Notes
 
Fixed
 
6.34%
 
2040
 
492.8

 
487.0

(3)
$400 Million 5.90% 2020 Senior Notes
 
Fixed
 
5.98%
 
2020
 
290.8

 
289.9

(4)
$500 Million 3.95% 2018 Senior Notes
 
Fixed
 
6.36%
 
2018
 
311.2

 
309.9

(5)
$540 Million 8.25% 2020 First Lien Notes
 
Fixed
 
9.97%
 
2020
 
540.0

 
506.4

(6)
$544.2 Million 7.75% 2020 Second Lien Notes
 
Fixed
 
15.55%
 
2020
 
544.2

 
407.4

(7)
$550 Million ABL Facility:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ABL Facility
 
Variable
 
N/A
 
2020
 
550.0

 
—

(8)
Fair Value Adjustment to Interest Rate Hedge
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2.4

 
Long-term debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
3,448.2

 
$
2,721.6

 
($ in Millions)
 
December 31, 2014
 
Debt Instrument
 
Type
 
Annual Effective Interest Rate
 
Final Maturity
 
Total Face Amount
 
Total Debt
 
$700 Million 4.875% 2021 Senior Notes
 
Fixed
 
4.88%
 
2021
 
$
690.0

 
$
689.5

(1)
$1.3 Billion Senior Notes:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$500 Million 4.80% 2020 Senior Notes
 
Fixed
 
4.83%
 
2020
 
490.0

 
489.4

(2)
$800 Million 6.25% 2040 Senior Notes
 
Fixed
 
6.34%
 
2040
 
800.0

 
790.5

(3)
$400 Million 5.90% 2020 Senior Notes
 
Fixed
 
5.98%
 
2020
 
395.0

 
393.7

(4)
$500 Million 3.95% 2018 Senior Notes
 
Fixed
 
5.17%
 
2018
 
480.0

 
477.4

(5)
$1.125 Billion Credit Facility:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revolving Credit Agreement
 
Variable
 
2.94%
 
2017
 
1,125.0

 
—

(9)
Fair Value Adjustment to Interest Rate Hedge
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2.8

 
Long-term debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
3,980.0

 
$
2,843.3

 
(1)
During the third quarter of 2015, we purchased $10.7 million of outstanding 4.875 percent senior notes that were trading at 50.0 percent of par which resulted in a gain on extinguishment of $5.3 million. In addition, during the first quarter of 2015, we purchased $58.3 million of outstanding 4.875 percent senior notes that were trading at 52.0 percent of par, which resulted in a gain on extinguishment of $20.0 million. Also during the first quarter, on March 27, 2015, we exchanged as part of a tender offer $208.5 million of the 4.875 percent senior notes for $170.3 million of the 7.75 percent second lien notes at a discount of $46.0 million based on an imputed interest rate of 15.55 percent, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of $83.1 million, net of amounts expensed for unamortized original issue discount and deferred origination fees.

15
Table of Contents


As of September 30, 2015, the $700.0 million 4.875 percent senior notes were recorded at a par value of $412.5 million less unamortized discounts of $0.2 million, based on an imputed interest rate of 4.89 percent. As of December 31, 2014, the $700.0 million 4.875 percent senior notes were recorded at a par value of $690.0 million less unamortized discounts of $0.5 million based on an imputed interest rate of 4.88 percent.
(2)
During the third quarter of 2015, we purchased $1.8 million of outstanding 4.80 percent senior notes that were trading at 50.0 percent of par, which resulted in a gain on extinguishment of $0.9 million. In addition, during the first quarter of 2015, we purchased $43.8 million of outstanding 4.80 percent senior notes that were trading at 54.3 percent of par, which resulted in a gain on extinguishment of $15.6 million. Also during the first quarter, on March 27, 2015, we exchanged as part of a tender offer $137.8 million of the 4.80 percent senior notes for $112.9 million of the 7.75 percent second lien notes at a discount of $30.5 million based on an imputed interest rate of 15.55 percent, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of $54.6 million, net of amounts expensed for unamortized original issue discount and deferred origination fees.
As of September 30, 2015, the $500.0 million 4.80 percent senior notes were recorded at a par value of $306.7 million less unamortized discounts of $0.4 million, based on an imputed interest rate of 4.83 percent. As of December 31, 2014, the $500.0 million 4.80 percent senior notes were recorded at a par value of $490.0 million less unamortized discounts of $0.6 million based on an imputed interest rate of 4.83 percent.
(3)
During the first quarter of 2015, we purchased $45.9 million of outstanding 6.25 percent senior notes that were trading at 52.5 percent of par, which resulted in a gain on extinguishment of $15.0 million. Also during the first quarter, on March 27, 2015, we exchanged as part of a tender offer $261.3 million of the 6.25 percent senior notes for $203.5 million of the 7.75 percent second lien notes at a discount of $55.0 million based on an imputed interest rate of 15.55 percent, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of $107.3 million, net of amounts expensed for unamortized original issue discount and deferred origination fees.
As of September 30, 2015, the $800 million 6.25 percent senior notes were recorded at a par value of $492.8 million less unamortized discounts of $5.8 million, based on an imputed interest rate of 6.34 percent. As of December 31, 2014, the $800 million 6.25 percent senior notes were recorded at a par value of $800.0 million less unamortized discounts of $9.5 million based on an imputed interest rate of 6.34 percent.
(4)
During the third quarter of 2015, we purchased $36.0 million of outstanding 5.90 percent senior notes that were trading at 50.0 percent of par, which resulted in a gain on extinguishment of $18.0 million. In addition, during the first quarter of 2015, we purchased $1.3 million of outstanding 5.90 percent senior notes that were trading at 58.0 percent of par, which resulted in a gain on extinguishment of $0.3 million. Also during the first quarter, on March 27, 2015, we exchanged as part of a tender offer $67.0 million of the 5.90 percent senior notes for $57.5 million of the 7.75 percent second lien notes at a discount of $15.5 million based on an imputed interest rate of 15.55 percent, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of $24.5 million, net of amounts expensed for unamortized original issue discount and deferred origination fees.
As of September 30, 2015, the $400.0 million 5.90 percent senior notes were recorded at a par value of $290.8 million less unamortized discounts of $0.9 million, based on an imputed interest rate of 5.98 percent. As of December 31, 2014, the $400.0 million 5.90 percent senior notes were recorded at a par value of $395.0 million less unamortized discounts of $1.3 million based on an imputed interest rate of 5.98 percent.
(5)
During the third quarter, on August 28, 2015, we purchased for cash as part of a tender offer, $124.8 million of the 3.95 percent senior notes for $68.6 million, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of $54.9 million, net of amounts expensed for reacquisition costs, unamortized original issue discount and deferred origination fees. In addition, during the first quarter of 2015, we purchased $44.0 million of outstanding 3.95 percent senior notes that were trading at 77.5 percent of par, which resulted in a gain on the extinguishment of debt of $7.1 million.
As of September 30, 2015, the $500.0 million 3.95 percent senior notes were recorded at a par value of $311.2 million less unamortized discounts of $1.3 million, based on an imputed interest rate of 6.36 percent. As of December 31, 2014, the $500.0 million 3.95 percent senior notes were recorded at a par value of $480.0 million less unamortized discounts of $2.6 million based on an imputed interest rate of 5.17 percent.
(6)
As of September 30, 2015, the $540.0 million 8.25 percent first lien notes were recorded at a par value of $540.0 million less unamortized discounts of $33.6 million, based on an imputed interest rate of 9.97 percent.

16
Table of Contents


(7)
As of September 30, 2015, the $544.2 million 7.75 percent second lien notes were recorded at a par value of $544.2 million less unamortized discounts of $136.8 million, based on an imputed interest rate of 15.55 percent. See NOTE 6 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS for further discussion of unamortized discount as a result of the exchange offers.
(8)
As of September 30, 2015, no loans were drawn under the ABL Facility and we had total availability of $442.9 million as a result of borrowing base limitations. As of September 30, 2015, the principal amount of letter of credit obligations totaled $187.3 million, thereby further reducing available borrowing capacity on our ABL Facility to $255.6 million.
(9)
As of December 31, 2014, we had no revolving loans drawn under the revolving credit agreement which had $1.125 billion availability. As of December 31, 2014, the principal amount of letter of credit obligations totaled $149.5 million, thereby reducing available borrowing capacity on the revolving credit agreement to $975.5 million.
Revolving Credit Facility
As of March 30, 2015, we eliminated the revolving credit agreement which was last amended on January 22, 2015 (Amendment No. 6). The revolving credit agreement was replaced with our ABL Facility.
As of December 31, 2014, we were in compliance with all applicable financial covenants related to the revolving credit agreement.
ABL Facility
On March 30, 2015, we entered into a new senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility with various financial institutions. The ABL Facility will mature upon the earlier of March 30, 2020 or 60 days prior to the maturity of the New First Lien Notes (as defined below) and certain other material debt, and provides for up to $550.0 million in borrowings, comprised of (i) a $450.0 million U.S. tranche, including a $250.0 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit and a $100.0 million sublimit for U.S. swingline loans, and (ii) a $100.0 million Australian tranche, including a $50.0 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit and a $20.0 million sublimit for Australian swingline loans. Availability under both the U.S. tranche and Australian tranche of the ABL Facility is limited to an eligible U.S. borrowing base and Australian borrowing base, as applicable, determined by applying customary advance rates to eligible accounts receivable, inventory and certain mobile equipment.
The ABL Facility and certain bank products and hedge obligations are guaranteed by us and certain of our existing wholly-owned U.S. and Australian subsidiaries and are required to be guaranteed by certain of our future U.S. and Australian subsidiaries; provided, however, that the obligations of any U.S. entity will not be guaranteed by any Australian entity. Amounts outstanding under the ABL Facility will be secured by (i) a first-priority security interest in the ABL Collateral (as defined herein), including, in the case of the Australian tranche only, ABL Collateral owned by a borrower or guarantor that is organized under the laws of Australia, and (ii) a third-priority security interest in the Notes Collateral (as defined herein). The priority of the security interests in the ABL Collateral and the Notes Collateral of the lenders under the ABL Facility and the holders of the First Lien Notes are set forth in intercreditor provisions contained in an ABL intercreditor agreement.
The ABL Collateral generally consists of the following assets: accounts receivable and other rights to payment, inventory, as-extracted collateral, investment property, certain general intangibles and commercial tort claims, certain mobile equipment, commodities accounts, deposit accounts, securities accounts and other related assets and proceeds and products of each of the foregoing.
Borrowings under the ABL Facility bear interest, at our option, at a base rate, an Australian base rate or, if certain conditions are met, a LIBOR rate, in each case plus an applicable margin. The base rate is equal to the greater of the federal funds rate plus ½ of 1 percent, the LIBOR rate based on a one-month interest period plus 1 percent and the floating rate announced by BAML as its “prime rate.” The Australian base rate is equal to the LIBOR rate as of 11:00 a.m. on the first business day of each month for a one-month period. The LIBOR rate is a per annum fixed rate equal to LIBOR with respect to the applicable interest period and amount of LIBOR rate loan requested.
The ABL Facility contains customary representations and warranties and affirmative and negative covenants including, among others, covenants regarding the maintenance of certain financial ratios if certain conditions are triggered, covenants relating to financial reporting, covenants relating to the payment of dividends on, or purchase or redemption of our capital stock, covenants relating to the incurrence or prepayment of certain debt, covenants relating to the incurrence of liens or encumbrances, compliance with laws, transactions with affiliates, mergers and sales of all or substantially all of our assets and limitations on changes in the nature of our business.

17
Table of Contents


The ABL Facility provides for customary events of default, including, among other things, the event of nonpayment of principal, interest, fees, or other amounts, a representation or warranty proving to have been materially incorrect when made, failure to perform or observe certain covenants within a specified period of time, a cross-default to certain material indebtedness, the bankruptcy or insolvency of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, monetary judgment defaults of a specified amount, invalidity of any loan documentation, a change of control of the Company, and ERISA defaults resulting in liability of a specified amount. In the event of a default by us (beyond any applicable grace or cure period, if any), the administrative agent may and, at the direction of the requisite number of lenders, shall declare all amounts owing under the ABL Facility immediately due and payable, terminate such lenders’ commitments to make loans under the ABL Facility and/or exercise any and all remedies and other rights under the ABL Facility. For certain defaults related to insolvency and receivership, the commitments of the lenders will be automatically terminated and all outstanding loans and other amounts will become immediately due and payable.
As of September 30, 2015, we were in compliance with the ABL Facility liquidity requirements and, therefore, the springing financial covenant requiring a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 was not applicable.
$540 Million 8.25 percent 2020 Senior Secured First Lien Notes - 2015 Offering

On March 30, 2015, we entered into an indenture among the Company, the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee and notes collateral agent, relating to our issuance of $540 million aggregate principal amount of 8.25 percent Senior First Lien Notes due 2020 (the "First Lien Notes"). The First Lien Notes were sold on March 30, 2015 in a private transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
The First Lien Notes bear interest at a rate of 8.25 percent per annum. Interest on the First Liens Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 31 and September 30 of each year, commencing on September 30, 2015. The First Lien Notes mature on March 31, 2020 and are secured senior obligations of the Company.
The First Lien Notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by substantially all of our material U.S. subsidiaries and are secured (subject in each case to certain exceptions and permitted liens) by (i) a first-priority lien on substantially all of our U.S. assets, other than the ABL Collateral (the "Notes Collateral"), and (ii) a second-priority lien on the U.S. ABL Collateral, which is junior to a first-priority lien for the benefit of the lenders under the ABL Facility. The First Lien Notes and guarantees are general senior obligations of the Company and the applicable guarantor; are effectively senior to all of our unsecured indebtedness, to the extent of the value of the collateral; together with other obligations secured equally and ratably with the First Lien Notes, are effectively (i) senior to our existing and future ABL obligations, to the extent and value of the Notes Collateral and (ii) senior to our obligations under the Second Lien Notes, to the extent and value of the collateral; are effectively subordinated to (i) our existing and future ABL obligations, to the extent and value of the ABL Collateral, and (ii) any existing or future indebtedness that is secured by liens on assets that do not constitute a part of the collateral, to the extent of the value of such assets; will rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness, and any guarantees thereof; will rank equally in priority as to the Notes Collateral with any future debt secured equally and ratably with the First Lien Notes incurred after March 30, 2015; rank senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness; and structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries that do not guarantee the First Lien Notes. The relative priority of the liens securing our First Lien Notes obligations and Second Lien Notes obligations compared to the liens securing our obligations under the ABL Facility and certain other matters relating to the administration of security interests are set forth in intercreditor agreements.
The terms of the First Lien Notes are governed by the First Lien Notes indenture. The First Lien Notes indenture contains customary covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur secured indebtedness, create liens on principal property and the capital stock or debt of a subsidiary that owns a principal property, use proceeds of dispositions of collateral, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, merge or consolidate with another company, and transfer or sell all or substantially all of our assets. Upon the occurrence of a “change of control triggering event,” as defined in the indenture, we are required to offer to repurchase the First Lien Notes at 101 percent of the aggregate principal amount thereof, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the repurchase date.
We may redeem any of the First Lien Notes beginning on March 31, 2018. The initial redemption price is 108.25 percent of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date. The redemption price will decline after 2018 and will be 100 percent of their principal amount, plus accrued interest, beginning on June 30, 2019. We may also redeem some or all of the First Lien Notes at any time and from time to time prior to March 31, 2018 at a price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount thereof plus a “make-whole” premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date. In addition, at any time and from time to time on or prior to March 31, 2018, we may redeem in the aggregate up to 35 percent of the original aggregate principal amount of the First Lien Notes (calculated after giving effect to any issuance of additional First Lien Notes) with the net

18
Table of Contents


cash proceeds of certain equity offerings, at a redemption price of 108.25 percent, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date, so long as at least 65 percent of the original aggregate principal amount of the First Lien Notes (calculated after giving effect to any issuance of additional First Lien Notes) issued under the First Lien Notes indenture remain outstanding after each such redemption.
The First Lien Notes indenture contains customary events of default, including failure to make required payments, failure to comply with certain agreements or covenants, failure to pay or acceleration of certain other indebtedness, certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency, and failure to pay certain judgments. An event of default under the First Lien indenture will allow either the trustee or the holders of at least 25 percent in aggregate principal amount of the then-outstanding First Lien Notes issued under such indenture to accelerate, or in certain cases, will automatically cause the acceleration of the amounts due under the First Lien Notes.
$544 Million 7.75 percent Senior Secured Second Lien Notes - 2015 Offering
On March 30, 2015, we also entered into an indenture among the Company, the guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee and notes collateral agent, relating to our issuance of $544.2 million aggregate principal amount of 7.75 percent second lien senior secured notes due 2020 (the "Second Lien Notes"). The Second Lien Notes were issued on March 30, 2015 in exchange offers for certain of our existing senior notes.
The Second Lien Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.75 percent per annum. Interest on the Second Lien Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 31 and September 30 of each year, commencing on September 30, 2015. The Second Lien Notes mature on March 31, 2020 and are secured senior obligations of the Company.
The Second Lien Notes have substantially similar terms to those of the First Lien Notes except with respect to their priority security interest in the collateral. The Second Lien Notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by substantially all of our material U.S. subsidiaries and are secured (subject in each case to certain exceptions and permitted liens) by (i) a second-priority lien (junior to the First Lien Notes) on substantially all of our U.S. assets, other than the ABL Collateral, and (ii) a third-priority lien (junior to the ABL Facility and the First Lien Notes) on the U.S. ABL Collateral.
The Company may redeem any of the Second Lien Notes beginning on March 31, 2017. The initial redemption price is 103.875 percent of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date. The redemption price will decline each year after March 31, 2017 and will be 100 percent of their principal amount, plus accrued interest, beginning on March 31, 2019. The Company may also redeem some or all of the Second Lien Notes at any time and from time to time prior to March 31, 2017 at a price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount thereof plus a “make-whole” premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date. In addition, at any time and from time to time on or prior to March 31, 2017, the Company may redeem in the aggregate up to 35 percent of the original aggregate principal amount of the Second Lien Notes (calculated after giving effect to any issuance of additional Second Lien Notes) with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings, at a redemption price of 107.75 percent, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date, so long as at least 65 percent of the original aggregate principal amount of the Second Lien Notes (calculated after giving effect to any issuance of additional Second Lien Notes) issued under the Second Lien Notes Indenture remain outstanding after each such redemption.    
Letters of Credit
We issued standby letters of credit with certain financial institutions in order to support business obligations including, but not limited to, workers compensation and environmental obligations. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, these letter of credit obligations totaled $187.3 million and $149.5 million, respectively.

19
Table of Contents


Debt Maturities
The following represents a summary of our maturities of debt instruments, excluding borrowings on the ABL Facility, based on the principal amounts outstanding at September 30, 2015:
 
(In Millions)
 
Maturities of Debt
2015 (October 1 - December 31)
$
—

2016
—

2017
—

2018
311.2

2019
—

2020
1,681.7

2021 and thereafter
905.3

Total maturities of debt
$
2,898.2

NOTE 6 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following represents the assets and liabilities of the Company measured at fair value at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
September 30, 2015
Description
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
$
80.0

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
80.0

Derivative assets
—

 
—

 
10.4

 
10.4

Total
$
80.0

 
$
—

 
$
10.4

 
$
90.4

Liabilities:

 

 

 

Derivative liabilities
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
0.8

 
$
0.8

Total
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
0.8

 
$
0.8


20
Table of Contents


 
(In Millions)
 
December 31, 2014
Description
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical
Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative assets
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
63.2

 
$
63.2

Available-for-sale marketable securities
4.3

 
—

 
—

 
4.3

Total
$
4.3

 
$
—

 
$
63.2

 
$
67.5

Liabilities:

 

 

 

Derivative liabilities
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
9.5

 
$
9.5

Foreign exchange contracts
—

 
31.5

 
—

 
31.5

Total
$
—

 
$
31.5

 
$
9.5

 
$
41.0

Financial assets classified in Level 1 at September 30, 2015 includes money market funds. Financial assets classified in Level 1 at December 31, 2014 include available-for-sale marketable securities. The valuation of these instruments is based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in active markets.
The valuation of financial assets and liabilities classified in Level 2 is determined using a market approach based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or other inputs that are observable. Level 2 securities primarily include derivative financial instruments valued using financial models that use as their basis readily observable market parameters. At December 31, 2014, such derivative financial instruments included our existing foreign currency exchange contracts. The fair value of the foreign currency exchange contracts is based on forward market prices and represents the estimated amount we would receive or pay to terminate these agreements at the reporting date, taking into account creditworthiness, nonperformance risk and liquidity risks associated with current market conditions.
The derivative financial assets classified within Level 3 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 primarily relate to a freestanding derivative instrument related to certain supply agreements with one of our U.S. Iron Ore customers. The agreements include provisions for supplemental revenue or refunds based on the customer’s annual steel pricing at the time the product is consumed in the customer’s blast furnaces. We account for this provision as a derivative instrument at the time of sale and adjust this provision to fair value as an adjustment to Product revenues each reporting period until the product is consumed and the amounts are settled. The fair value of the instrument is determined using a market approach based on an estimate of the annual realized price of hot-rolled steel at the steelmaker’s facilities, and takes into consideration current market conditions and nonperformance risk.
The Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities also consisted of derivatives related to certain provisional pricing arrangements with our U.S. Iron Ore and Asia Pacific Iron Ore customers at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. These provisional pricing arrangements specify provisional price calculations, where the pricing mechanisms generally are based on market pricing, with the final revenue rate to be based on market inputs at a specified point in time in the future, per the terms of the supply agreements. The difference between the estimated final revenue at the date of sale and the estimated final revenue rate is characterized as a derivative and is required to be accounted for separately once the revenue has been recognized. The derivative instrument is adjusted to fair value through Product revenues each reporting period based upon current market data and forward-looking estimates provided by management until the final revenue rate is determined.
The following table illustrates information about quantitative inputs and assumptions for the derivative assets and derivative liabilities categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy:

21
Table of Contents


Qualitative/Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
 
 
(In Millions)
Fair Value at September 30, 2015
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Valuation Technique
 
Unobservable Input
 
Range or Point Estimate per ton
(Weighted Average)
 
Provisional Pricing Arrangements
 
$
0.6

 
Other current assets
 
Market Approach
 
Management's
Estimate of 62% Fe
 
$56
 
$
0.8

 
Other current liabilities
 
 
 
Customer Supply Agreement
 
$
9.8

 
Other current assets
 
Market Approach
 
Hot-Rolled Steel Estimate
 
$470 - $515 ($489)
The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the reporting entity’s provisional pricing arrangements is management’s estimate of 62 percent Fe fines spot price based upon current market data, including historical seasonality and forward-looking estimates determined by management. Significant increases or decreases in this input would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement, respectively.
The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the reporting entity’s customer supply agreement is the future hot-rolled steel price that is estimated based on projections provided by the customer, current market data, analysts' projections and forward-looking estimates determined by management. Significant increases or decreases in this input would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement, respectively.
We recognize any transfers between levels as of the beginning of the reporting period. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 or 2014. The following tables represent a reconciliation of the changes in fair value of financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.
 
(In Millions)
 
Derivative Assets (Level 3)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Beginning balance
$
7.7

 
$
33.0

 
$
63.2

 
$
57.7

Total gains (losses)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Included in earnings
15.0

 
62.6

 
28.1

 
124.6

Settlements
(12.3
)
 
(41.1
)
 
(80.9
)
 
(127.8
)
Transfers into Level 3
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Transfers out of Level 3
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Ending balance - September 30
$
10.4

 
$
54.5

 
$
10.4

 
$
54.5

Total gains for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains on assets still held at the reporting date
$
12.2

 
$
62.6

 
$
22.7

 
$
124.6


22
Table of Contents


 
(In Millions)
 
Derivative Liabilities (Level 3)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Beginning balance
$
(8.0
)
 
$
(20.2
)
 
$
(9.5
)
 
$
(1.0
)
Total gains (losses)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Included in earnings
(13.7
)
 
2.3

 
(45.4
)
 
(17.9
)
Settlements
20.9

 
—

 
54.1

 
1.0

Transfers into Level 3
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Transfers out of Level 3
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Ending balance - September 30
$
(0.8
)
 
$
(17.9
)
 
$
(0.8
)
 
$
(17.9
)
Total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized losses on liabilities still held at the reporting date
$
(0.5
)
 
$
2.3

 
$
(0.8
)
 
$
(17.9
)
Gains and losses included in earnings are reported in Product revenues in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.
The carrying amount for certain financial instruments (e.g., Accounts receivable, net, Accounts payable and Accrued expenses) approximates fair value and, therefore, has been excluded from the table below. A summary of the carrying amount and fair value of other financial instruments at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were as follows:
 
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
Classification
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair Value
Long-term debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior Notes—$700 million
Level 1
 
$
412.3

 
$
115.4

 
$
689.5

 
$
367.3

Senior Notes—$1.3 billion
Level 1
 
793.3

 
242.4

 
1,279.9

 
704.0

Senior Notes—$400 million
Level 1
 
289.9

 
99.6

 
393.7

 
228.1

Senior Notes—$500 million
Level 1
 
309.9

 
162.6

 
477.4

 
312.0

Senior First Lien Notes —$540 million
Level 1
 
506.4

 
477.9

 
—

 
—

Senior Second Lien Notes —$544.2 million
Level 1
 
407.4

 
217.7

 
—

 
—

ABL Facility
Level 2
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Fair value adjustment to interest rate hedge
Level 2
 
2.4

 
2.4

 
2.8

 
2.8

Total long-term debt
 
 
$
2,721.6

 
$
1,318.0

 
$
2,843.3

 
$
1,614.2

The fair value of long-term debt was determined using quoted market prices based upon current borrowing rates. The asset based revolving credit facility is variable rate interest and approximates fair value. See NOTE 5 - DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES for further information.

23
Table of Contents


Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
The following tables present information about the financial and non-financial assets and liabilities that were measured on a fair value basis at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. There were no financial and non-financial assets and liabilities that were measured on a non-recurring fair value basis at September 30, 2015. The tables also indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques used to determine such fair value.
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
March 31, 2015
Description
 
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical Assets/
Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
 
Total Gains
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$544.2 Million 7.75% 2020 Second Lien Notes
 
$
—

 
$
397.2

 
$
—

 
$
397.2

 
$
269.5

 
 
$
—

 
$
397.2

 
$
—

 
$
397.2

 
$
269.5

The $544.2 million 7.75 percent Second Lien Notes issued in the exchange offers were recorded as an extinguishment of debt as the change in debt terms was considered substantial. As such, the newly issued Second Lien Senior Notes were recorded at fair value at the issuance date. In order to determine the fair value of the Second Lien Senior Notes on the date of the exchange, we utilized the median bid ask spread obtained from various investment banks for the exchange date. The bid ask spread is indicative of the fair value of the notes on the exchange date. The 27.0 percent discount equated to a discount of $147.0 million on the issue value of $544.2 million, or an estimated fair value of $397.2 million.
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
December 31, 2014
Description
 
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical Assets/
Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
 
Total Losses
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill impairment -
Asia Pacific Iron Ore reporting unit
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
73.5

Other long-lived assets -
Property, plant and equipment
    and Mineral rights:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asia Pacific Iron Ore reporting unit
 
—

 
—

 
72.4

 
72.4

 
526.5

Other reporting units
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
11.3

Other long-lived assets -
Intangibles and other long-term assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asia Pacific Iron Ore reporting unit
 
—

 
—

 
7.0

 
7.0

 
24.2

Investment in ventures
impairment - Global Exploration
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
9.2

 
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
79.4

 
$
79.4

 
$
644.7

Financial Assets
During the third quarter of 2014, an impairment charge of $9.2 million to investment in ventures was recorded within our Global Exploration operating segment as a decision was made to abandon the investment during the period.

24
Table of Contents


Non-Financial Assets
During the third and fourth quarter of 2014, we identified factors that indicated the carrying values of the asset groups in the chart above may not be recoverable primarily due to long-term price forecasts as part of management’s long-range planning process. Updated estimates of long-term prices for all products, specifically the Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot price were lower than prior estimates. This especially affects the Asia Pacific Iron Ore business segment because their contracts correlate heavily to world market spot pricing, which were updated based upon current market conditions, macro-economic factors influencing the balance of supply and demand for our products and expectations for future cost and capital expenditure requirements. Additionally, our CEO, Lourenco Goncalves, was appointed by the Board of Directors in early August 2014 and was subsequently identified as the CODM in accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting. Our CODM views Asia Pacific Iron Ore as a non-core asset and has communicated plans to evaluate the business unit for a change in strategy including possible divestiture. These factors, among other considerations utilized in the individual impairment assessments, indicate that the carrying value of the respective asset groups in the chart above and Asia Pacific Iron Ore goodwill may not be recoverable.
During the third quarter of 2014, a goodwill impairment charge of $73.5 million was recorded for our Asia Pacific Iron Ore reporting units within our Asia Pacific Iron Ore operating segment. Based on our review of the fair value hierarchy, the inputs used in these fair value measurements were considered Level 3 inputs.
We also recorded impairment charges to property, plant and equipment, mineral rights, intangible assets and other long-term assets during the second half of 2014 related to our Asia Pacific Iron Ore operating segment, along with impairments charged to reporting units within our Other reportable segments. A detailed break out of the impairment charges is shown in the chart above. The recorded impairment charges reduce the related assets to their estimated fair value as we determined that the future cash flows associated with these operations were not sufficient to support the recoverability of the carrying value of these assets. Fair value was determined based on management's best estimate within a range of fair values, which is considered a Level 3 input, and resulted in an asset impairment charge of $562.0 million. The Level 3 inputs used to determine fair value included models developed and market inputs obtained by management which provided a range of fair value estimates of property, plant and equipment. Management’s models include internally developed long-term future cash flow estimates, capital expenditure and cost estimates, market inputs to determine long-term pricing assumptions, discount rates, and foreign exchange rates.
NOTE 7 - PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
The following are the components of defined benefit pension and OPEB expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
Defined Benefit Pension Expense
 
(In Millions)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Service cost
$
3.1

 
$
4.7

 
$
15.7

 
$
18.2

Interest cost
9.0

 
9.6

 
27.9

 
29.8

Expected return on plan assets
(14.5
)
 
(14.1
)
 
(44.4
)
 
(43.1
)
Amortization:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prior service costs
0.5

 
0.7

 
1.7

 
1.9

Net actuarial loss
4.5

 
3.3

 
15.3

 
10.4

    Curtailments/settlements
(0.1
)
 
$
1.7

 
0.2

 
2.9

Net periodic benefit cost to continuing operations
$
2.5

 
$
5.9

 
$
16.4

 
$
20.1


25
Table of Contents


Other Postretirement Benefits Expense
 
(In Millions)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Service cost
$
(1.6
)
 
$
(1.9
)
 
$
1.4

 
$
1.4

Interest cost
2.1

 
2.2

 
8.6

 
9.0

Expected return on plan assets
(4.5
)
 
(4.2
)
 
(13.7
)
 
(12.8
)
Amortization:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prior service costs
0.6

 
0.6

 
(1.2
)
 
(1.2
)
Net actuarial loss
1.1

 
1.0

 
4.2

 
3.5

Net periodic benefit cost to continuing operations
$
(2.3
)
 
$
(2.3
)
 
$
(0.7
)
 
$
(0.1
)
We made pension contributions of $23.9 million and $34.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared to pension contributions of $31.8 million and $41.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. OPEB contributions are typically made on an annual basis in the first quarter of each year, but due to plan funding requirements being met, no OPEB contributions were required or made for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014.
NOTE 8 - STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
Employees’ Plans
The 2015 Equity Plan was approved by our Board of Directors on March 26, 2015 and by our shareholders on May 19, 2015. The 2015 Equity Plan replaced the 2012 Amended Equity Plan. The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2015 Equity Plan is 12.9 million common shares. No additional grants were issued from the 2012 Amended Equity Plan after the date of approval of the 2015 Equity Plan; however, all awards previously granted under the 2012 Amended Equity Plan and the 2012 Equity Plan will continue in full force and effect in accordance with the terms of outstanding awards.
During the third quarter of 2015, the Compensation and Organization Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") approved grants under the 2015 Equity Plan of 1.5 million restricted share units to certain officers and employees with a grant date of September 10, 2015. The restricted share units granted under this award are subject to continued employment through the vesting date of December 15, 2017.
During the first quarter of 2015, the Committee approved grants under the 2012 Amended Equity Plan to certain officers and employees for the 2015 to 2017 performance period. Shares granted under the awards consisted of 0.9 million performance shares, 0.9 million restricted share units and 0.4 million stock options.
The outstanding performance share or unit grants vest over a period of three years and are intended to be paid out in common shares or cash in certain circumstances. Performance is measured on the basis of relative TSR for the period and measured against the constituents of the S&P Metals and Mining ETF Index on the last day of trading of the relevant performance period. The final payouts for the outstanding performance period grants will vary from zero to 200 percent of the original grant depending on whether and to what extent the Company achieves certain objectives and performance goals as established by the Committee.
The restricted share units that were granted during the first quarter of 2015 are subject to continued employment, are retention based, will vest in equal thirds on each of December 31, 2015, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017, and are payable in common shares or cash in certain circumstances at a time determined by the Committee at its discretion.
The stock options that were granted during the first quarter of 2015 vest on December 31, 2017, subject to continued employment through the vesting date, are exercisable at a strike price of $7.70 after the vesting date and expire on January 12, 2025.

26
Table of Contents


Determination of Fair Value
The fair value of each performance share grant is estimated on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation to forecast relative TSR performance. A correlation matrix of historic and projected stock prices was developed for both the Company and our predetermined peer group of mining and metals companies. The fair value assumes that performance goals will be achieved.
The expected term of the grant represents the time from the grant date to the end of the service period for each of the three plan-year agreements. We estimate the volatility of our common shares and that of the peer group of mining and metals companies using daily price intervals for all companies. The risk-free interest rate is the rate at the grant date on zero-coupon government bonds, with a term commensurate with the remaining life of the performance period.
The following assumptions were utilized to estimate the fair value for the first quarter of 2015 performance share grants:
Grant Date
 
Grant Date Market Price
 
Average Expected Term (Years)
 
Expected Volatility
 
Risk-Free Interest Rate
 
Dividend Yield
 
Fair Value
 
Fair Value (Percent of Grant Date Market Price)
January 12, 2015
 
$
7.70

 
2.97
 
58.3%
 
0.91%
 
—%
 
$
11.56

 
150.13%
February 9, 2015
 
$
6.57

 
2.89
 
58.3%
 
0.87%
 
—%
 
$
9.86

 
150.13%
The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes valuation model. The expected term of the option grant is determined using the simplified method. We estimate the volatility of our common shares using historical stock prices with consistent frequency over the most recent historical period equal to the option’s expected term. The risk-free interest rate is the rate at the grant date on zero-coupon government bonds, with a term commensurate with the expected term.
The following assumptions were utilized to estimate the fair value for the first quarter of 2015 stock option grants:
    
Grant Date
 
Grant Date Market Price
 
Average Expected Term (Years)
 
Expected Volatility
 
Risk-Free Interest Rate
 
Dividend Yield
 
Fair Value
January 12, 2015
 
$
7.70

 
6.47
 
75.3%
 
1.60%
 
—%
 
$
5.23

The fair value of the restricted share units is determined based on the closing price of our common shares on the grant date. The restricted share units granted under the 2015 Equity Plan vest over 27 months. The restricted share units granted under either the 2012 Equity Plan or the 2012 Amended Equity Plan generally vest over a period of three years.
NOTE 9 - INCOME TAXES
Our 2015 estimated annual effective tax rate before discrete items is approximately 2.1 percent. The annual effective tax rate differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 35 percent primarily due to deductions for percentage depletion in excess of cost depletion related to U.S. operations and the reversal of valuation allowances related to the utilization of net operating losses. A comparable annual effective tax rate has not been provided for the nine months ended 2014 as our loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 exceeded the anticipated ordinary loss for the full year and, therefore, our tax expense recorded was calculated using actual year-to-date amounts rather than an estimated annual effective tax rate.
There were discrete items booked in the first nine months of 2015 of approximately $162.6 million. These adjustments relate primarily to the placement of a valuation allowance against U.S. deferred tax assets that were recognized in prior years. There were discrete items booked in the first nine months of 2014 of approximately $35.0 million. These items were largely related to the recording of valuation allowances against existing deferred tax assets as a result of the determination that they would no longer be realizable, the repeal of the Australian Minerals Resources Rent Tax and the finalization of certain domestic and foreign tax returns.

27
Table of Contents


NOTE 10 - LEASE OBLIGATIONS
We lease certain mining, production and other equipment under operating and capital leases. The leases are for varying lengths, generally at market interest rates and contain purchase and/or renewal options at the end of the terms. Our operating lease expense related to continuing operations was $3.2 million and $9.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, compared with $4.4 million and $13.9 million for the same respective periods in 2014.
Future minimum payments under capital leases and non-cancellable operating leases at September 30, 2015 are as follows:
 
(In Millions)
 
Capital Leases
 
Operating Leases
2015 (October 1 - December 31)
$
5.9

 
$
2.6

2016
23.2

 
7.6

2017
21.3

 
7.0

2018
17.2

 
6.4

2019
9.5

 
4.8

2020 and thereafter
17.5

 
9.9

Total minimum lease payments
$
94.6

 
$
38.3

Amounts representing interest
19.5

 
 
Present value of net minimum lease payments
$
75.1

(1) 
 
                                         
(1) 
The total is comprised of $16.9 million and $58.2 million classified as Other current liabilities and Other liabilities, respectively, in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position at September 30, 2015.
NOTE 11 - ENVIRONMENTAL AND MINE CLOSURE OBLIGATIONS
We had environmental and mine closure liabilities of $215.3 million and $170.8 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The following is a summary of the obligations as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
September 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Environmental
$
4.3

 
$
5.5

Mine closure
 
 
 
LTVSMC
23.9

 
22.9

Operating mines:
 
 
 
U.S. Iron Ore
171.5

 
120.9

Asia Pacific Iron Ore
15.6

 
21.5

Total mine closure
211.0

 
165.3

Total environmental and mine closure obligations
215.3

 
170.8

Less current portion
3.4

 
5.2

Long term environmental and mine closure obligations
$
211.9

 
$
165.6

Mine Closure
The accrued closure obligation for our active mining operations provides for contractual and legal obligations associated with the eventual closure of the mining operations. The accretion of the liability and amortization of the related asset is recognized over the estimated mine lives for each location.

28
Table of Contents


The following represents a rollforward of our asset retirement obligation liability related to our active mining locations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and for the year ended December 31, 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
September 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014 (1)
Asset retirement obligation at beginning of period
$
142.4

 
$
177.6

Accretion expense
4.5

 
5.7

Exchange rate changes
(1.7
)
 
(2.4
)
Revision in estimated cash flows
41.9

 
(38.5
)
Asset retirement obligation at end of period
$
187.1

 
$
142.4


(1) Represents a 12-month rollforward of our asset retirement obligation at December 31, 2014.
The revision in the asset retirement costs recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 relates primarily to revisions of the timing of the estimated cash flows associated with required storm water management systems expected to be implemented subsequent to the closure of one of our U.S. Iron Ore mines.
NOTE 12 - GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Goodwill
The following table summarizes changes in the carrying amount of goodwill allocated by operating segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014 (1)
 
U.S. Iron Ore
 
Asia Pacific
Iron Ore
 
Total
 
U.S. Iron Ore
 
Asia Pacific Iron Ore
 
Total
Beginning Balance
$
2.0

 
$
—

 
$
2.0

 
$
2.0

 
$
72.5

 
$
74.5

Impairment
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(73.5
)
 
(73.5
)
Impact of foreign currency translation
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1.0

 
1.0

Ending Balance
$
2.0

 
$
—

 
$
2.0

 
$
2.0

 
$
—

 
$
2.0

Accumulated goodwill impairment loss
$
—

 
$
(73.5
)
 
$
(73.5
)
 
$
—

 
$
(73.5
)
 
$
(73.5
)
(1) Represents a 12-month rollforward of our goodwill at December 31, 2014.

29
Table of Contents


Other Intangible Assets and Liabilities
The following table is a summary of intangible assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
 
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
Classification
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
Definite-lived intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Permits
Other non-current assets
 
$
78.2

 
$
(19.3
)
 
$
58.9

 
$
79.2

 
$
(16.5
)
 
$
62.7

Total intangible assets
 
 
$
78.2

 
$
(19.3
)
 
$
58.9

 
$
79.2

 
$
(16.5
)
 
$
62.7

Below-market sales contracts
Other current liabilities
 
$
(23.0
)
 
$
—

 
$
(23.0
)
 
$
(23.0
)
 
$
—

 
$
(23.0
)
Below-market sales contracts
Other liabilities
 
(205.9
)
 
198.1

 
(7.8
)
 
(205.9
)
 
182.8

 
(23.1
)
Total below-market sales contracts
 
 
$
(228.9
)
 
$
198.1

 
$
(30.8
)
 
$
(228.9
)
 
$
182.8

 
$
(46.1
)
Amortization expense relating to intangible assets was $0.9 million and $3.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and is recognized in Cost of goods sold and operating expenses in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations. Amortization expense relating to intangible assets was $2.3 million and $6.9 million for the comparable periods in 2014. The estimated amortization expense relating to intangible assets for the remainder of this year and each of the five succeeding years is as follows:

(In Millions)

Amount
Year Ending December 31,

2015 (remaining three months)
$
0.9

2016
3.7

2017
4.2

2018
4.1

2019
3.0

2020
2.5

Total
$
18.4

The below-market sales contract is classified as a liability and recognized over the term of the underlying contract, which has a remaining life of approximately one year and expires December 31, 2016. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recognized $7.7 million and $15.4 million, respectively, in Product revenues related to the below-market sales contracts. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recognized $7.7 million and $15.4 million, respectively, in Product revenues related to the below-market sales contracts. The following amounts are estimated to be recognized in Product revenues for the remainder of this year and the succeeding fiscal year:
 
(In Millions)
 
Year Ending December 31,
2015 (remaining three months)
$
7.7

2016
23.1

Total
$
30.8


30
Table of Contents


NOTE 13 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The following table presents the fair value of our derivative instruments and the classification of each in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
Derivative Assets
 
Derivative Liabilities
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Derivative Instrument
Balance Sheet Location
 
Fair
Value
 
Balance
Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign Exchange Contracts
 
 
$
—

 
 
 
$
—

 
 
 
$
—

 
Other current liabilities
 
$
21.6

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815
 
 
$
—

 
 
 
$
—

 
 
 
$
—

 
 
 
$
21.6

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign Exchange Contracts
 
 
$
—

 
 
 
$
—

 
 
 
$
—

 
Other current liabilities
 
$
9.9

Customer Supply Agreement
Other current assets
 
9.8

 
Other current assets
 
63.2

 
 
 
—

 
 
 
—

Provisional Pricing Arrangements
Other current assets
 
0.6

 
 
 
—

 
Other current liabilities
 
0.8

 
Other current liabilities
 
9.5

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815
 
 
$
10.4

 
 
 
$
63.2

 
 
 
$
0.8

 
 
 
$
19.4

Total derivatives
 
 
$
10.4

 
 
 
$
63.2

 
 
 
$
0.8

 
 
 
$
41.0

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
Cash Flow Hedges
Australian Dollar Foreign Exchange Contracts
We are subject to changes in foreign currency exchange rates as a result of our operations in Australia. With respect to Australia, foreign exchange risk arises from our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates because the functional currency of our Asia Pacific operations is the Australian dollar. Our Asia Pacific operations receive funds in U.S. currency for their iron ore sales.
We were using foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge our foreign currency exposure for a portion of our U.S. dollar sales receipts in our Australian functional currency entities. For our Australian operations, U.S. dollars are converted to Australian dollars at the currency exchange rate in effect during the period the transaction occurred. The primary objective for the use of these instruments was to reduce exposure to changes in currency exchange rates and to protect against undue adverse movement in these exchange rates. These instruments qualify for hedge accounting treatment and are tested for effectiveness at inception and at least once each reporting period. If and when any of our hedge contracts are determined not to be highly effective as hedges, the underlying hedged transaction is no longer likely to occur, or the derivative is terminated, hedge accounting is discontinued. Due to the uncertainty of 2015 hedge exposures, we have suspended entering into new foreign exchange rate contracts. As discussed in NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, we have waived compliance with our current derivative financial instruments and hedging activities policy through December 31, 2015.
As of September 30, 2015, we had no outstanding Australian foreign currency exchange contracts in the form of forward contracts for which we elected hedge accounting. Our one remaining outstanding Australian foreign exchange

31
Table of Contents


rate contract matured in September 2015. This compares with outstanding Australian foreign currency exchange contracts with a notional amount of $220.0 million as of December 31, 2014.
Changes in fair value of highly effective hedges are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position. Any ineffectiveness is recognized immediately in income. As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, there was no material ineffectiveness recorded for foreign exchange contracts that were classified as cash flow hedges. However, certain Australian hedge contracts were de-designated during the first quarter of 2015 and no longer qualified for hedge accounting treatment. All of these de-designated hedges were settled and were no longer outstanding by March 31, 2015. The de-designated hedges are discussed within the Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments section of this footnote. Amounts recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss are reclassified into earnings in the same period the forecasted transactions affect earnings. No amounts remain in Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the designated Australian hedge contracts as the last designated and outstanding Australian foreign exchange rate contract matured in September 2015.
The following summarizes the effect of our derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments, net of tax in Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
(In Millions)
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on Derivatives
 
Location of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from Accumulated OCI into Earnings
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Earnings
(Effective Portion)
 
(Effective Portion)
 
(Effective Portion)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
Australian Dollar Foreign
Exchange Contracts
   (hedge designation)
$
0.1

 
$
(12.6
)
 
Product revenues
 
$
(0.1
)
 
$
1.6

Australian Dollar Foreign
Exchange Contracts
(prior to de-designation)
—

 
—

 
Product revenues
 
(4.3
)
 
—

Canadian Dollar Foreign Exchange Contracts
   (hedge designation)
—

 
(7.4
)
 
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
 
—

 
(1.0
)
Total
$
0.1

 
$
(20.0
)
 
 
 
$
(4.4
)
 
$
0.6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
Australian Dollar Foreign
Exchange Contracts
(hedge designation)
$
(2.0
)
 
$
(3.4
)
 
Product revenues
 
$
(7.4
)
 
$
(11.2
)
Australian Dollar Foreign
Exchange Contracts
 (prior to de-designation)
(4.5
)
 
—

 
Product revenues
 
(11.1
)
 
—

Canadian Dollar Foreign Exchange Contracts
    (hedge designation)
—

 
(9.2
)
 
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
 
—

 
(7.1
)
Canadian Dollar Foreign Exchange Contracts
(prior to de-designation)
—

 
—

 
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
 
—

 
(0.5
)
 
$
(6.5
)
 
$
(12.6
)
 
 
 
$
(18.5
)
 
$
(18.8
)

32
Table of Contents


Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign Exchange Contracts
During the first quarter of 2015, in connection with our refinancing initiatives, we discontinued hedge accounting and early-settled certain of our Australian foreign currency exchange contracts associated with Asia Pacific Iron Ore operations. Subsequent to de-designation, no further foreign currency exchange rate contracts were entered into for the Asia Pacific Iron Ore operations. The amounts that were previously recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss prior to de-designation and remaining in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of de-designation will be reclassified to earnings and a corresponding realized loss will be recognized when the forecasted cash flow occurs. The hedges were de-designated and early-settled at the end of the first quarter of 2015. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, we reclassified losses of $2.1 million and $11.8 million from Accumulated other comprehensive loss and recorded the amounts as Product revenues in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations upon the occurrence of the forecasted cash flows associated with each de-designated and early-settled contract. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, prior to the de-designation of the Asia Pacific Iron Ore hedges at the end of the first quarter of 2015, we reclassified losses of $6.3 million from Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to contracts that matured during the year, and recorded the amounts as Product revenues in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations. As of September 30, 2015, losses of $0.4 million (net of tax) remain in Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the effective cash flow hedge contracts prior to de-designation and early-settlement. We estimate the remaining losses of $0.4 million (net of tax) will be reclassified to Product revenues during the remainder of 2015 upon the occurrence of the related forecasted cash flows.
During the fourth quarter of 2014, we discontinued hedge accounting for Canadian foreign currency exchange contracts for all outstanding contracts associated with Bloom Lake operations as projected future cash flows were no longer considered probable or reasonably possible, but we continued to hold these instruments as economic hedges to manage currency risk. Our parent company held the Canadian foreign currency exchange contracts and the contracts were unaffected by Bloom Lake General Partner Limited and certain of its affiliates filing under the CCAA on January 27, 2015. Subsequent to de-designation, no further foreign currency exchange contracts were entered into for the Bloom Lake operations. As of September 30, 2015 no de-designated foreign exchange rate contracts remained outstanding. All outstanding Canadian de-designated foreign exchange rate contracts settled by the end of September 2015. As of December 31, 2014, the de-designated outstanding foreign exchange rate contracts had notional amounts of $183.0 million in the form of forward contracts.
The amounts that were previously recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss prior to de-designation and remaining in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2014 were reclassified to earnings upon the de-designation of the hedges as the hedges would not be effective prospectively due to the projected future cash flows associated with the hedges no longer being considered probable or reasonably possible. We reclassified losses of $7.3 million from Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to contracts that had not matured during the year, and recorded the amounts as Cost of goods sold and operating expenses in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations. A corresponding realized gain or loss is recognized in each period until settlement of the related economic hedge during 2015. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the change in fair value of these de-designated foreign currency exchange contracts resulted in net losses of $1.1 million and net losses of $3.6 million, respectively.
We previously discontinued hedge accounting for Canadian foreign currency exchange contracts for all outstanding contracts associated with the Wabush operation and the Ferroalloys operating segment as projected future cash flows were no longer considered probable, but we continued to hold these instruments as economic hedges to manage currency risk. Subsequent to de-designation, no further foreign currency exchange contracts were entered into for the Wabush operation or the Ferroalloys operating segment. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were no outstanding de-designated foreign currency exchange rate contracts as all remaining de-designated foreign exchange contracts matured during the second quarter of 2014.

33
Table of Contents


Prior to the maturation of the contracts and as a result of discontinued hedge accounting, the instruments were prospectively adjusted to fair value each reporting period through Cost of goods sold and operating expenses in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the change in fair value of our de-designated foreign currency exchange contracts resulted in net losses of $3.3 million. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, there were no changes in fair value of our de-designated foreign exchange contracts as all the remaining contracts had matured during the second quarter of 2014. The amounts that were previously recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss prior to de-designation were reclassified to earnings and a corresponding realized gain or loss was recognized when the forecasted cash flow occurred. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we reclassified losses of $0.5 million from Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to contracts that matured during the period, and recorded the amounts as Cost of goods sold and operating expenses in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, there were no amounts reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to contracts that matured during the period as all the remaining contracts had matured during the second quarter of 2014 and as of the period ended June 30, 2014, no gains or losses remained in Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the effective cash flow hedge contracts prior to de-designation.
Fair Value Hedges
Interest Rate Hedges
Our fixed-to-variable interest rate swap derivative instruments, with a notional amount of $250.0 million, were de-designated and settled during August 2014. Prior to settlement, the derivatives were designated and qualified as fair value hedges. The objective of the hedges was to offset changes in the fair value of our debt instruments associated with fluctuations in the benchmark LIBOR interest rate as part of our risk management strategy.
Prior to de-designation and settlement, when the interest rate swap derivative instruments were designated and qualified as fair-value hedges, the gain or loss on the hedge instrument as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk were recognized in net income. We included the gain or loss on the derivative instrument and the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item in Other non-operating income (expense). The net gains recognized in Other non-operating income (expense) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
Customer Supply Agreements
Most of our U.S. Iron Ore long-term supply agreements are comprised of a base price with annual price adjustment factors. The base price is the primary component of the purchase price for each contract. The indexed price adjustment factors are integral to the iron ore supply contracts and vary based on the agreement, but typically include adjustments based upon changes in the Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot price and/or international pellet prices and changes in specified Producer Price Indices, including those for industrial commodities, energy and steel. The pricing adjustments generally operate in the same manner, with each factor typically comprising a portion of the price adjustment, although the weighting of each factor varies based upon the specific terms of each agreement. In most cases, these adjustment factors have not been finalized at the time our product is sold. In these cases, we historically have estimated the adjustment factors at each reporting period based upon the best third-party information available. The estimates are then adjusted to actual when the information has been finalized. The price adjustment factors have been evaluated to determine if they contain embedded derivatives. The price adjustment factors share the same economic characteristics and risks as the host contract and are integral to the host contract as inflation adjustments; accordingly, they have not been separately valued as derivative instruments. Certain of our term supply agreements contain price collars, which typically limit the percentage increase or decrease in prices for our products during any given year.
A certain supply agreement with one U.S. Iron Ore customer provides for supplemental revenue or refunds to the customer based on the customer’s average annual steel pricing at the time the product is consumed in the customer’s blast furnace. The supplemental pricing is characterized as a freestanding derivative and is required to be accounted for separately once the product is shipped. The derivative instrument, which is finalized based on a future price, is adjusted to fair value as a revenue adjustment each reporting period until the pellets are consumed and the amounts are settled.
We recognized $11.6 million and $22.1 million as Product revenues in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, related to the supplemental payments. This compares with Product revenues of $62.6 million and $124.6 million for the comparable periods in 2014. Derivative assets, representing the fair value of the pricing factors, were $9.8 million and $63.2 million in the September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position, respectively.

34
Table of Contents


Provisional Pricing Arrangements
Certain of our U.S. Iron Ore and Asia Pacific Iron Ore customer supply agreements specify provisional price calculations, where the pricing mechanisms generally are based on market pricing, with the final revenue rate to be based on market inputs at a specified period in time in the future, per the terms of the supply agreements. U.S. Iron Ore sales revenue is primarily recognized when cash is received.  For U.S. Iron Ore sales, the difference between the provisionally agreed-upon price and the estimated final revenue rate is characterized as a freestanding derivative and must be accounted for separately once the provisional revenue has been recognized.  Asia Pacific Iron Ore sales revenue is initially recorded at the provisionally agreed-upon price with the pricing provision embedded in the receivable.  The pricing provision is an embedded derivative that must be bifurcated and accounted for separately from the receivable.  Subsequently, the derivative instruments for both U.S. Iron Ore and Asia Pacific Iron Ore are adjusted to fair value through Product revenues each reporting period based upon current market data and forward-looking estimates provided by management until the final revenue rate is determined. At September 30, 2015, we recorded $0.6 million as Other current assets related to our estimate of the final revenue rate with our Asia Pacific Iron Ore customers. At December 31, 2014, we recorded no Other current assets related to our estimate of the final revenue rate with any of our customers. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we recorded $0.8 million and $9.5 million, respectively, as Other current liabilities in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position related to our estimate of the final revenue rate with our U.S. Iron Ore and Asia Pacific Iron Ore customers. These amounts represent the difference between the provisional price agreed upon with our customers based on the supply agreement terms and our estimate of the final revenue rate based on the price calculations established in the supply agreements. As a result, we recognized a net $7.6 million increase and a net $0.2 million decrease in Product revenues in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 related to these arrangements. This compares with a net $2.3 million increase and a net $17.9 million decrease in Product revenues for the comparable periods in 2014.
The following summarizes the effect of our derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
(In Millions)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivative
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Foreign Exchange Contracts
Other non-operating income (expense) (1)
$
(1.1
)
 
$
—

 
$
(3.6
)
 
$
(3.3
)
Foreign Exchange Contracts
Product revenues
(2.1
)
 
—

 
(11.8
)
 
—

Commodity Contracts
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
—

 
—

 
(3.4
)
 
—

Customer Supply Agreement
Product revenues
11.6

 
62.6

 
22.1

 
124.6

Provisional Pricing Arrangements
Product revenues
7.6

 
2.3

 
(0.2
)
 
(17.9
)
 
 
$
16.0

 
$
64.9

 
$
3.1

 
$
103.4

                                                                     
(1)  
At September 30, 2014, the location of the Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative for Foreign Exchange Contracts was Cost of goods sold and operating expenses.
Refer to NOTE 6 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS for additional information.
NOTE 14 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The information below sets forth selected financial information related to operating results of our businesses classified as discontinued operations. While the reclassification of revenues and expenses related to discontinued operations from prior periods have no impact upon previously reported net income, the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations present the revenues and expenses that were reclassified from the specified line items to discontinued operations and the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position present

35
Table of Contents


the assets and liabilities that were reclassified from the specified line items to assets and liabilities of discontinued operations.
The chart below provides an asset group breakout for each financial statement line impacted by discontinued operations.
(In Millions)
 
 
 
 
Canadian Operations
 
 
 
 
 
North American Coal
 
Eastern Canadian Iron Ore
Other
Total Canadian Operations
 
Total of Discontinued Operations
Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations
Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax
QTD
September 30, 2015
$
(29.8
)
 
$
(14.1
)
$
—

$
(14.1
)
 
$
(43.9
)
Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax
QTD
September 30, 2014
$
(579.7
)
 
$
(5,782.5
)
$
(250.8
)
$
(6,033.3
)
 
$
(6,613.0
)
Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax
YTD
September 30, 2015
$
(137.0
)
 
$
(731.9
)
$
(0.1
)
$
(732.0
)
 
$
(869.0
)
Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax
YTD
September 30, 2014
$
(643.6
)
 
$
(5,930.4
)
$
(255.8
)
$
(6,186.2
)
 
$
(6,829.8
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position
Short-term assets of discontinued operations
As of
September 30, 2015
$
141.4

 
$
—

$
—

$
—

 
$
141.4

Long-term assets of discontinued operations
As of
September 30, 2015
$
—

 
$
—

$
—

$
—

 
$
—

Short-term liabilities of discontinued operations
As of
September 30, 2015
$
182.2

 
$
—

$
—

$
—

 
$
182.2

Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations
As of
September 30, 2015
$
—

 
$
—

$
—

$
—

 
$
—

Short-term assets of discontinued operations
As of
December 31, 2014
$
143.8

 
$
183.5

$
3.3

$
186.8

 
$
330.6

Long-term assets of discontinued operations
As of
December 31, 2014
$
130.4

 
$
256.0

$
13.7

$
269.7

 
$
400.1

Short-term liabilities of discontinued operations
As of
December 31, 2014
$
81.3

 
$
316.3

$
3.0

$
319.3

 
$
400.6

Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations
As of
December 31, 2014
$
125.9

 
$
304.6

$
5.6

$
310.2

 
$
436.1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-Cash Operating and Investing Activities
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
YTD
September 30, 2015
$
3.2

 
$
—

$
—

$
—

 
$
3.2

Purchase of property, plant and equipment
YTD
September 30, 2015
$
13.1

 
$
—

$
—

$
—

 
$
13.1

Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
YTD
September 30, 2015
$
73.4

 
$
—

$
—

$
—

 
$
73.4

Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
YTD
September 30, 2014
$
92.1

 
$
126.4

$
0.3

$
126.7

 
$
218.8

Purchase of property, plant and equipment
YTD
September 30, 2014
$
25.8

 
$
160.9

$
—

$
160.9

 
$
186.7

Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
YTD
September 30, 2014
$
—

 
$
6,307.3

$
259.5

$
6,566.8

 
$
6,566.8


36
Table of Contents


North American Coal Operations
Background
As we continue to refine our strategy to one that focuses on strengthening our U.S. Iron Ore operations, management determined as of March 31, 2015 that our North American Coal operating segment met the criteria to be classified as held for sale under ASC 205 - Presentation of Financial Statements and continues to meet the criteria as of September 30, 2015. As such, all current and historical North American Coal operating segment results are included in our financial statement and classified within discontinued operations. Consistent with our strategy to extract maximum value from our current assets, we plan to sell the North American Coal assets within the next twelve months. In the first quarter of 2015, as part of the held for sale classification assigned to North American Coal, an impairment of $73.4 million was recorded. The impairment charge was to reduce the assets to their estimated fair value which was determined based on potential sales scenarios. No further impairment was recorded in the second or third quarters of 2015.
Loss on Discontinued Operations
Our planned sale of the Oak Grove and Pinnacle mine assets represents a strategic shift in our business. For this reason, our previously reported North American Coal operating segment results for all periods, prior to the March 31, 2015 held for sale determination, are classified as discontinued operations. This includes our CLCC assets, which were sold during the fourth quarter of 2014.
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Loss from Discontinued Operations
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Revenues from product sales and services
 
$
78.8

 
$
170.5

 
$
338.1

 
$
515.8

Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
 
(102.9
)
 
(194.7
)
 
(377.2
)
 
(641.2
)
Sales margin
 
(24.1
)
 
(24.2
)
 
(39.1
)
 
(125.4
)
Other operating expense
 
(7.4
)
 
(5.6
)
 
(25.7
)
 
(15.2
)
Other expense
 
(0.4
)
 
(0.9
)
 
(1.4
)
 
(1.8
)
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes
 
(31.9
)
 
(30.7
)
 
(66.2
)
 
(142.4
)
Impairment of long-lived assets
 
—

 
(827.8
)
 
(73.4
)
 
(827.8
)
Income tax benefit
 
2.1

 
278.8

 
2.6

 
326.6

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
$
(29.8
)
 
$
(579.7
)
 
$
(137.0
)
 
$
(643.6
)

37
Table of Contents


Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
The following table presents information about the impairment charge on non-financial assets that was measured on a fair value basis at March 31, 2015 for the North American Coal operations. There were no financial and non-financial assets and liabilities that were measured on a non-recurring fair value basis at September 30, 2015 for the North American Coal operations. The table also indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques used to determine such fair value.
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
March 31, 2015
Description
 
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical Assets/
Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
 
Total Losses
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other long-lived assets - Property, plant and equipment and Mineral rights: North American Coal operating unit
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
20.4

 
$
20.4

 
$
73.4

 
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
20.4

 
$
20.4

 
$
73.4

In the first quarter of 2015, as part of the held for sale classification assigned to North American Coal, an impairment charge of $73.4 million was recorded. The impairment charge was to reduce the assets to their estimated fair value which was determined based on potential sales scenarios. We determined the fair value and recoverability of our North American Coal operating segment by comparing the estimated fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities to the estimated sales price of the operating segment held for sale. No further impairment was recorded in the second or third quarter of 2015.
Recorded Assets and Liabilities
 
 
(In Millions)
Assets and Liabilities of Discontinued Operations
 
September 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Accounts receivable, net
 
$
35.8

 
$
44.8

Inventories
 
21.4

 
50.3

Supplies and other inventories
 
28.0

 
28.2

Other current assets
 
24.1

 
20.5

Property, plant and equipment, net
 
31.3

 
94.7

Other non-current assets
 
0.8

 
35.7

Total assets of discontinued operations
 
$
141.4

 
$
274.2

 
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable
 
$
18.6

 
$
22.4

Accrued liabilities
 
16.6

 
27.9

Other current liabilities
 
19.7

 
31.0

Pension and postemployment benefit liabilities1
 
59.5

 
55.8

Environmental and mine closure obligations
 
35.4

 
33.9

Other liabilities
 
32.4

 
36.2

Total liabilities of discontinued operations
 
$
182.2

 
$
207.2

1 This does not include a liability of approximately $330 million, which is the most recent estimate of Pinnacle and Oak Grove’s combined share of the underfunded liability under the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan.

38
Table of Contents


Income Taxes
We have recognized a tax benefit of $2.1 million and $2.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, in Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax, related to a loss on our North American Coal investments. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recognized a tax benefit of $278.8 million and $326.6 million, respectively, in Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax. This benefit is primarily the result of the impairment of long-lived assets in the third quarter of 2014.
Canadian Operations
Background
On November 30, 2013, we suspended indefinitely our Chromite Project in Northern Ontario. The Chromite Project remained suspended throughout 2014 and until final sale in 2015. Our Wabush Scully iron ore mine in Newfoundland and Labrador was idled by the end of the first quarter of 2014 and subsequently began to commence permanent closure in the fourth quarter of 2014. During 2014, we also limited exploration spending on the Labrador Trough South property in Québec. In November 2014, we announced that we were pursuing exit options for our Eastern Canadian Iron Ore operations. In December 2014, iron ore production at the Bloom Lake mine was suspended and the Bloom Lake mine was placed in "care-and-maintenance" mode. Together, the suspension of exploration efforts, shutdown of the Wabush Scully mine and the cessation of operations at our Bloom Lake mine represent a complete curtailment of our Canadian operations.
On January 27, 2015, we announced that the Bloom Lake Group commenced restructuring proceedings (the "Bloom Filing") under the CCAA with the Québec Superior Court (Commercial Division) in Montreal (the “Court”). At that time, the Bloom Lake Group was no longer generating revenues and was not able to meet its obligations as they came due. The Bloom Filing addressed the Bloom Lake Group's immediate liquidity issues and permits the Bloom Lake Group to preserve and protect its assets for the benefit of all stakeholders while restructuring and sale options are explored. As part of the CCAA process, the Court approved the appointment of a Monitor and certain other financial advisors.
Additionally, on May 20, 2015, we announced that the Wabush Group commenced restructuring proceedings (the "Wabush Filing") in the Court under the CCAA. As a result of this action, the CCAA protections granted to the Bloom Lake Group were extended to include the Wabush Group to facilitate the reorganization of each of their businesses and operations. The Wabush Group was no longer generating revenues and was not able to meet its obligations as they came due. The inclusion of the Wabush Group in the existing Bloom Filing will facilitate a more comprehensive restructuring and sale process of both the Bloom Lake Group and the Wabush Group which collectively include mine, port and rail assets and will lead to a more effective and streamlined exit from Eastern Canada. The Wabush Filing will also mitigate various legacy related long-term liabilities associated with the Wabush Group. As part of the Wabush Filing, the Court approved the appointment of a Monitor and certain other financial advisors. The Monitor of the Wabush Group is also the Monitor of the Bloom Lake Group.
As a result of the Bloom Filing on January 27, 2015, we no longer have a controlling interest in the Bloom Lake Group. For that reason, we deconsolidated the Bloom Lake Group and certain other wholly-owned subsidiaries effective January 27, 2015, which resulted in a pretax impairment loss on deconsolidation and other charges, totaling $818.7 million that was recorded in the first quarter of 2015. The pretax loss on deconsolidation includes the derecognition of the carrying amounts of the Bloom Lake Group and certain other wholly-owned subsidiaries assets, liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive loss and the recording of our remaining interests at fair value.
As a result of the Wabush Filing, we deconsolidated certain Wabush Group wholly-owned subsidiaries effective May 20, 2015. The certain wholly-owned subsidiaries that were deconsolidated effective May 20, 2015 are Wabush Group entities that were not deconsolidated as part of the deconsolidation effective January 27, 2015 as discussed previously in this section. This deconsolidation, effective May 20, 2015, resulted in a pretax gain on deconsolidation and other charges, totaling $134.7 million. The pretax gain on deconsolidation includes the derecognition of the carrying amounts of these certain deconsolidated Wabush Group wholly-owned subsidiaries' assets, liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive loss and the adjustment of our remaining interests in the Canadian Entities to fair value.
Subsequent to each of the deconsolidations discussed above, we utilized the cost method to account for our investment in the Bloom Lake Group, Wabush Group and certain other wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the "Canadian Entities"), which has been reflected as zero in our Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position as of September 30, 2015 based on the estimated fair value of the Canadian Entities' net assets. Loans to and accounts receivable from the Canadian Entities are recorded at an estimated fair value of $84.5 million classified as Other current assets in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position as of September 30, 2015.

39
Table of Contents


Loss on Discontinued Operations
Our Canadian exit represents a strategic shift in our business. For this reason, our previously reported Eastern Canadian Iron Ore and Ferroalloys operating segment results for all periods prior to the respective deconsolidations as well as costs to exit are classified as discontinued operations.
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Loss from Discontinued Operations
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Revenues from product sales and services
 
$
—

 
$
148.0

 
$
11.3

 
$
480.3

Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
 
—

 
(224.7
)
 
(11.1
)
 
(645.2
)
Eliminations with continuing operations
 
—

 
(27.6
)
 
—

 
(56.6
)
Sales margin
 
—

 
(104.3
)
 
0.2

 
(221.5
)
Other operating expense
 
—

 
(87.4
)
 
(33.8
)
 
(200.4
)
Other expense
 
—

 
(1.5
)
 
(1.0
)
 
(4.5
)
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes
 
—

 
(193.2
)
 
(34.6
)
 
(426.4
)
Loss from deconsolidation
 
(13.4
)
 
—

 
(697.4
)
 
—

Impairment of long-lived assets
 
—

 
(6,566.8
)
 
—

 
(6,566.8
)
Income tax benefit (expense)
 
(0.7
)
 
726.7

 
—

 
807.0

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
$
(14.1
)
 
$
(6,033.3
)
 
$
(732.0
)
 
$
(6,186.2
)
Canadian Entities loss from deconsolidation totaled $13.4 million and $697.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and included the following:
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
2015
 
2015
Investment impairment on deconsolidation1
 
$
(13.9
)
 
$
(494.3
)
Contingent liabilities
 
0.5

 
(203.1
)
Total loss from deconsolidation
 
$
(13.4
)
 
$
(697.4
)
 
 
 
 
 
1 Includes the adjustment to fair value of our remaining interest in the Canadian Entities.
As a result of the deconsolidation we recorded accrued expenses for the estimated probable loss related to claims that may be asserted against us, primarily under guarantees of certain debt arrangements and leases for a loss on deconsolidation of $203.1 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
Investments in the Canadian Entities
Cliffs continues to indirectly own a majority of the interest in the Canadian Entities but has deconsolidated those entities because Cliffs no longer has a controlling interest as a result of the Bloom Filing and the Wabush Filing. At the respective date of deconsolidation, January 27, 2015 or May 20, 2015 and subsequently at each reporting period, we adjusted our investment in the Canadian Entities to fair value with a corresponding charge to Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax. As the estimated amount of the Canadian Entities' liabilities exceeded the estimated fair value of the assets available for distribution to its creditors, the fair value of Cliffs’ equity investment is approximately zero.
Amounts Receivable from the Canadian Entities
Prior to the deconsolidations, various Cliffs wholly-owned entities made loans to the Canadian Entities for the purpose of funding its operations and had accounts receivable generated in the ordinary course of business. The loans, corresponding interest and the accounts receivable were considered intercompany transactions and eliminated in our consolidated financial statements. Since the deconsolidations, the loans, associated interest and accounts receivable are considered related party transactions and have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements at their

40
Table of Contents


estimated fair value of $84.5 million classified as Other current assets in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position at September 30, 2015.
Contingent Liabilities
Certain liabilities consisting primarily of equipment loans and environmental obligations of the Canadian Entities were secured through corporate guarantees and standby letters of credit. As of September 30, 2015, we have liabilities of $105.5 million and $37.4 million, respectively, in our consolidated results, classified as Other current liabilities and Other liabilities in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position.
Contingencies
The recorded expenses include an accrual for the estimated probable loss related to claims that may be asserted against us, primarily under guarantees of certain debt arrangements and leases. The beneficiaries of those guarantees may seek damages or other related relief as a result of our exit from Canada. Our probable loss estimate is based on the expectation that claims will be asserted against us and negotiated settlements will be reached, and not on any determination that it is probable we would be found liable were these claims to be litigated. Given the early stage of our exit, the Bloom Filing on January 27, 2015 and the Wabush Filing on May 20, 2015, our estimates involve significant judgment. Our estimates are based on currently available information, an assessment of the validity of certain claims and estimated payments by the Canadian Entities. We are not able to reasonably estimate a range of possible losses in excess of the accrual because there are significant factual and legal issues to be resolved. We believe that it is reasonably possible that future changes to our estimates of loss and the ultimate amount paid on these claims could be material to our results of operations in future periods. Any such losses would be reported in discontinued operations.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
The following table presents information about the financial assets and liabilities that were measured on a fair value basis at September 30, 2015 for the Canadian Operations. The table also indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques used to determine such fair value.
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
September 30, 2015
Description
 
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical Assets/
Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
 
Total Losses
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans to and accounts receivables from the Canadian Entities
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
84.5

 
$
84.5

 
$
494.3

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent liabilities
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
142.4

 
$
142.4

 
$
203.1

We determined the fair value and recoverability of our Canadian investments by comparing the estimated fair value of the remaining underlying assets of the Canadian Entities to remaining estimated liabilities. We recorded the contingent liabilities at book value which best approximated fair value.
Outstanding liabilities include accounts payable and other liabilities, forward commitments, unsubordinated related party payables, lease liabilities and other potential claims. Potential claims include an accrual for the estimated probable loss related to claims that may be asserted against the Bloom Lake Group and Wabush Group under certain contracts. Claimants may seek damages or other related relief as a result of the Canadian Entities' exit from Canada. Based on our estimates, the fair value of liabilities exceeds the fair value of assets.
To assess the fair value and recoverability of the amounts receivable from the Canadian Entities, we estimated the fair value of the underlying net assets of the Canadian Entities available for distribution to their creditors in relation to the estimated creditor claims and the priority of those claims.
Our estimates involve significant judgment and are based on currently available information, an assessment of the validity of certain claims and estimated payments made by the Canadian Entities. Our ultimate recovery is subject

41
Table of Contents


to the final liquidation value of the Canadian Entities. Further, the final liquidation value and ultimate recovery of the creditors of the Canadian Entities, including Cliffs Natural Resources and various subsidiaries, may impact our estimates of contingent liability exposure described previously.
Recorded Assets and Liabilities
 
 
(In Millions)
Assets and Liabilities of Discontinued Operations
 
December 31,
2014
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
19.7

Accounts receivable, net
 
37.9

Inventories
 
16.3

Supplies and other inventories
 
48.5

Income tax receivable
 
20.1

Other current assets
 
44.3

Property, plant and equipment, net
 
249.8

Other non-current assets
 
19.9

Total Assets
 
$
456.5

 
 
 
Accounts payable
 
$
83.6

Accrued expenses
 
200.0

Other current liabilities
 
35.7

Pension and postemployment benefit liabilities
 
79.8

Environmental and mine closure obligations
 
56.5

Other liabilities
 
173.9

Total Liabilities
 
$
629.5

DIP Financing
In connection with the Wabush Filing on May 20, 2015, the Court approved an agreement to provide a debtor-in-possession credit facility (the "DIP financing") to the Wabush Group, which provides for borrowings under the facility up to $10.0 million. As of September 30, 2015, there was $4.9 million drawn and outstanding under the DIP financing funded by Wabush Iron Co. Limited’s parent company, Cliffs Mining Company. The DIP financing is secured by a court-ordered charge over the assets of the Wabush Group.
Income Taxes
We recognized a tax expense of $0.7 million for three months ended September 30, 2015 in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax. We recognized no tax benefit or expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recognized a tax benefit of $726.7 million and $807.0 million, respectively, in Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax. This benefit was the result of the impairment of long-lived assets in the third quarter of 2014 offset by the placement of a valuation allowance against the Canadian operations net deferred tax assets. Canadian deferred tax assets relating to both historical and current year net operating losses were included in our equity investment in the Canadian Subsidiaries that has been reduced to zero.

42
Table of Contents


NOTE 15 - CAPITAL STOCK
Dividends
On February 11, 2014, May 13, 2014, September 8, 2014 and November 19, 2014, our Board of Directors declared the quarterly cash dividend of $17.50 per Preferred Share, which is equivalent to approximately $0.44 per depositary share. The cash dividend was paid on May 1, 2014, August 1, 2014, November 3, 2014, and February 2, 2015 to our Preferred Shareholders of record as of the close of business on April 15, 2014, July 15, 2014, October 15, 2014 and January 15, 2015, respectively. On March 27, 2015 and July 1, 2015 our Board of Directors declared the quarterly cash dividend of $17.50 per Preferred Share, which is equivalent to approximately $0.44 per depositary share. The cash dividend was paid on May 1, 2015 and August 3, 2015 to our shareholders of record as of the close of business on April 15, 2015 and July 15, 2015, respectively. Additionally, on September 10, 2015, our Board of Directors declared the quarterly cash dividend of $17.50 per Preferred Share, which is equivalent to approximately $0.44 per depositary share. This cash dividend of $12.8 million will be paid on November 2, 2015, to our Preferred Shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 15, 2015.
On January 26, 2015, we announced that our Board of Directors had decided to eliminate the quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share on our common shares. The decision was applicable to the first quarter of 2015 and all subsequent quarters. The elimination of the common share dividend provides us with additional free cash flow of approximately $92 million annually, which we intend to use for further debt reduction.
During 2014, a cash dividend of $0.15 per share was paid on March 3, 2014, June 3, 2014, September 2, 2014 and December 1, 2014 to our common shareholders of record as of close of business on February 21, 2014, May 23, 2014, August 15, 2014 and November 15, 2014, respectively.

43
Table of Contents


NOTE 16 - SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
The following table reflects the changes in shareholders' equity (deficit) attributable to both Cliffs and the noncontrolling interests primarily related to Bloom Lake, Tilden and Empire of which Cliffs owns 82.8 percent, 85 percent and 79 percent, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
Cliffs
Shareholders’
Equity (Deficit)
 
Noncontrolling
Interest (Deficit)
 
Total Equity (Deficit)
December 31, 2014
$
(1,431.3
)
 
$
(303.0
)
 
$
(1,734.3
)
Comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
(689.0
)
 
(1.5
)
 
(690.5
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
220.7

 
(9.3
)
 
211.4

Total comprehensive loss
(468.3
)
 
(10.8
)
 
(479.1
)
Effect of deconsolidation
—

 
528.2

 
528.2

Stock and other incentive plans
6.0

 
—

 
6.0

Preferred share dividends
(38.4
)
 
—

 
(38.4
)
Distributions of partnership equity
—

 
(40.7
)
 
(40.7
)
Undistributed losses to noncontrolling interest
—

 
(1.2
)
 
(1.2
)
September 30, 2015
$
(1,932.0
)
 
$
172.5

 
$
(1,759.5
)
 
(In Millions)
 
Cliffs
Shareholders’
Equity (Deficit)
 
Noncontrolling
Interest (Deficit)
 
Total Equity (Deficit)
December 31, 2013
$
6,069.5

 
$
814.8

 
$
6,884.3

Comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss
(5,939.0
)
 
(1,004.4
)
 
(6,943.4
)
Other comprehensive income
11.5

 
1.6

 
13.1

Total comprehensive loss
(5,927.5
)
 
(1,002.8
)
 
(6,930.3
)
Stock and other incentive plans
(3.4
)
 
—

 
(3.4
)
Common and preferred share dividends
(107.9
)
 
—

 
(107.9
)
Undistributed losses to noncontrolling interest
—

 
(20.0
)
 
(20.0
)
September 30, 2014
$
30.7

 
$
(208.0
)
 
$
(177.3
)

44
Table of Contents


The following table reflects the changes in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to Cliffs shareholders’ equity for September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
Changes in Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits, net of tax
 
Unrealized Net Gain (Loss) on Securities, net of tax
 
Unrealized Net Gain (Loss) on Foreign Currency Translation
 
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Financial Instruments, net of tax
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance December 31, 2014
$
(291.1
)
 
$
(1.0
)
 
$
64.4

 
$
(18.1
)
 
$
(245.8
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
9.3

 
2.8

 
(14.7
)
 
(7.1
)
 
(9.7
)
Net loss (gain) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
30.3

 
(2.0
)
 
182.7

 
6.3

 
217.3

Balance March 31, 2015
$
(251.5
)
 
$
(0.2
)
 
$
232.4

 
$
(18.9
)
 
$
(38.2
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
1.3

 
1.0

 
1.2

 
0.5

 
4.0

Net loss (gain) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(1.6
)
 
(0.9
)
 
—

 
7.8

 
5.3

Balance June 30, 2015
$
(251.8
)
 
$
(0.1
)
 
$
233.6

 
$
(10.6
)
 
$
(28.9
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(0.7
)
 
0.1

 
(11.4
)
 
4.8

 
(7.2
)
Net loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
6.6

 
—

 
—

 
4.4

 
11.0

Balance September 30, 2015
$
(245.9
)
 
$
—

 
$
222.2

 
$
(1.4
)
 
$
(25.1
)

45
Table of Contents


 
(In Millions)
 
Changes in Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits, net of tax
 
Unrealized Net Gain (Loss) on Securities, net of tax
 
Unrealized Net Gain (Loss) on Foreign Currency Translation
 
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Financial Instruments, net of tax
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance December 31, 2013
$
(204.9
)
 
$
6.2

 
$
106.7

 
$
(20.9
)
 
$
(112.9
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(0.4
)
 
3.8

 
40.5

 
(2.3
)
 
41.6

Net loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
3.3

 
0.1

 
—

 
12.8

 
16.2

Balance March 31, 2014
$
(202.0
)
 
$
10.1

 
$
147.2

 
$
(10.4
)
 
$
(55.1
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(1.4
)
 
(2.4
)
 
19.7

 
9.7

 
25.6

Net loss (gain) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
4.0

 
(1.3
)
 
—

 
6.6

 
9.3

Balance June 30, 2014
$
(199.4
)
 
$
6.4

 
$
166.9

 
$
5.9

 
$
(20.2
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
3.5

 
1.3

 
(65.9
)
 
(20.0
)
 
(81.1
)
Net loss (gain) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
7.6

 
(7.1
)
 
—

 
(0.6
)
 
(0.1
)
Balance September 30, 2014
$
(188.3
)
 
$
0.6

 
$
101.0

 
$
(14.7
)
 
$
(101.4
)

46
Table of Contents


The following table reflects the details about Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components related to Cliffs shareholders’ equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015:
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components
 
Amount of (Gain)/Loss Reclassified into Income
 
Affected Line Item in the Statement of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
Amortization of pension and postretirement benefit liability:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prior service costs (1)
 
$
1.1

 
$
1.3

 
$
0.5

 
$
0.7

 
 
Net actuarial loss (1)
 
5.6

 
4.3

 
19.5

 
13.9

 
 
Settlements/curtailments (1)
 
(0.1
)
 
1.7

 
0.2

 
2.9

 
 
Effect of deconsolidation (2)
 
—

 
—

 
15.1

 
—

 
Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax
 
 
6.6

 
7.3

 
35.3

 
17.5

 
Total before taxes
 
 
—

 
1.6

 
—

 
(1.3
)
 
Income tax benefit (expense)
 
 
$
6.6

 
$
8.9

 
$
35.3

 
$
16.2

 
Net of taxes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sale of marketable securities
 
$
—

 
$
(9.7
)
 
$
—

 
$
(11.4
)
 
Other non-operating income (expense)
Impairment
 
—

 
(0.3
)
 
(3.2
)
 
(0.3
)
 
Other non-operating income (expense)
 
 
—

 
(10.0
)
 
(3.2
)
 
(11.7
)
 
Total before taxes
 
 
—

 
2.9

 
0.3

 
3.4

 
Income tax benefit (expense)
 
 
$
—

 
$
(7.1
)
 
$
(2.9
)
 
$
(8.3
)
 
Net of taxes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign currency translation:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effect of deconsolidation (3)
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
182.7

 
$
—

 
Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax
 
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
Income tax benefit (expense)
 
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
182.7

 
$
—

 
Net of taxes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Australian dollar foreign exchange contracts
 
$
6.3

 
$
(1.6
)
 
$
26.4

 
$
16.7

 
Product revenues
Canadian dollar foreign exchange contracts
 
—

 
1.5

 
—

 
11.4

 
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
 
 
6.3

 
(0.1
)
 
26.4

 
28.1

 
Total before taxes
 
 
(1.9
)
 
(0.5
)
 
(7.9
)
 
(9.3
)
 
Income tax benefit (expense)
 
 
$
4.4

 
$
(0.6
)
 
$
18.5

 
$
18.8

 
Net of taxes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Reclassifications for the Period
 
$
11.0

 
$
1.2

 
$
233.6

 
$
26.7

 
 
                                         
(1) 
These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. See NOTE 7 - PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS for further information.
(2) 
Represents Canadian postretirement benefit liabilities that were deconsolidated. See NOTE 14 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS for further information.
(3) 
Represents Canadian accumulated currency translation adjustments that were deconsolidated. See NOTE 14 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS for further information.

47
Table of Contents


NOTE 17 - CASH FLOW INFORMATION
A reconciliation of capital additions to cash paid for capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:
 
(In Millions)
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
Capital additions (1)
$
69.0

 
$
186.0

Cash paid for capital expenditures
57.9

 
233.2

Difference
$
11.1

 
$
(47.2
)
Non-cash accruals
$
10.4

 
$
(57.1
)
Capital leases
0.7

 
9.9

Total
$
11.1

 
$
(47.2
)
                                   
(1) 
Includes capital additions of $46.6 million and $22.4 million related to continuing operations and discontinued operations, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Includes capital additions of $49.0 million and $137.0 million related to continuing operations and discontinued operations, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
Non-Cash Financing Activities - Declared Dividends
On September 10, 2015, our Board of Directors declared the quarterly cash dividend on our Preferred Shares of $17.50 per share, which is equivalent to approximately $0.44 per depositary share, each representing 1/40th of a share of Series A preferred stock. The cash dividend of $12.8 million will be paid on November 2, 2015 to our preferred shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 15, 2015.
NOTE 18 - RELATED PARTIES
Three of our five U.S. iron ore mines are owned with various joint venture partners that are integrated steel producers or their subsidiaries. We are the manager of each of the mines we co-own and rely on our joint venture partners to make their required capital contributions and to pay for their share of the iron ore pellets that we produce. The joint venture partners are also our customers. The following is a summary of the mine ownership of these iron ore mines at September 30, 2015:
Mine
 
Cliffs Natural Resources
 
ArcelorMittal
 
U.S. Steel Corporation
 
Empire
 
79.0
%
 
21.0
%
 
—

 
Tilden
 
85.0
%
 
—

 
15.0
%
 
Hibbing
 
23.0
%
 
62.3
%
 
14.7
%
 
ArcelorMittal has a unilateral right to put its interest in the Empire mine to us, but has not exercised this right to date. Furthermore, as part of the 2014 Extension Agreement that was entered into among ArcelorMittal and the Company, which amended certain terms of the Restated Empire Iron Mining Partnership Agreement, certain minimum distributions of the partners’ equity amounts are required to be made on a quarterly basis beginning in the first quarter of 2015 and will continue through the first quarter of 2017.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recorded distributions of $9.0 million and $40.7 million, respectively, to ArcelorMittal under this agreement of which $31.7 million was paid as of September 30, 2015.

48
Table of Contents


Product revenues from related parties were as follows:
 
(In Millions)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Product revenues from related parties
$
208.0

 
$
285.2

 
$
468.0

 
$
625.4

Total product revenues
542.5

 
901.9

 
1,399.9

 
2,161.7

Related party product revenue as a percent of total product revenue
38.3
%
 
31.6
%
 
33.4
%
 
28.9
%
Amounts due from related parties recorded in Accounts receivable, net and Other current assets, including trade accounts receivable, a customer supply agreement and provisional pricing arrangements, were $12.2 million and $127.6 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Amounts due to related parties recorded in Accounts payable and Other current liabilities, including provisional pricing arrangements, were $10.9 million at September 30, 2015 and amounts including provisional pricing arrangements and liabilities to related parties were $11.8 million at December 31, 2014.
NOTE 19 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table summarizes the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
 
(In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
$
49.9

 
$
(274.2
)
 
$
178.5

 
$
(113.6
)
Loss (Income) from Continuing Operations Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest
4.6

 
(2.5
)
 
(6.2
)
 
(22.4
)
Net Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Attributable to Cliffs Shareholders
$
54.5

 
$
(276.7
)
 
$
172.3

 
$
(136.0
)
Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax
(43.9
)
 
(5,602.9
)
 
(861.3
)
 
(5,803.0
)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Cliffs Shareholders
$
10.6

 
$
(5,879.6
)
 
$
(689.0
)
 
$
(5,939.0
)
Preferred Stock Dividends
(25.6
)
 
(12.8
)
 
(38.4
)
 
(38.4
)
Net Loss Attributable to Cliffs Common Shareholders
$
(15.0
)
 
$
(5,892.4
)
 
$
(727.4
)
 
$
(5,977.4
)
Weighted Average Number of Shares:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
153.2

 
153.1

 
153.2

 
153.1

Depositary Shares
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Employee Stock Plans
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Diluted
153.2

 
153.1

 
153.2

 
153.1

Earnings (Loss) per Common Share Attributable to
Cliffs Common Shareholders - Basic:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
0.19

 
$
(1.89
)
 
$
0.87

 
$
(1.14
)
Discontinued operations
(0.29
)
 
(36.60
)
 
(5.62
)
 
(37.91
)
 
$
(0.10
)
 
$
(38.49
)
 
$
(4.75
)
 
$
(39.05
)
Earnings (Loss) per Common Share Attributable to
Cliffs Common Shareholders - Diluted:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
0.19

 
$
(1.89
)
 
$
0.87

 
$
(1.14
)
Discontinued operations
(0.29
)
 
(36.60
)
 
(5.62
)
 
(37.91
)
 
$
(0.10
)
 
$
(38.49
)
 
$
(4.75
)
 
$
(39.05
)
The three and nine months ended 2015 and 2014 has been calculated to properly reflect the breakout of noncontrolling interest between continuing and discontinued operations during the respective periods. The diluted

49
Table of Contents


earnings per share calculation excludes 25.2 million depositary shares that were anti-dilutive for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. Additionally, the diluted earnings per share calculation excludes 0.1 million shares and 0.2 million shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, and 0.5 million shares and 0.9 million shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, related to equity plan awards that would have been anti-dilutive.
NOTE 20 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Contingencies
Litigation
We are currently a party to various claims and legal proceedings incidental to our operations. If management believes that a loss arising from these matters is probable and can reasonably be estimated, we record the amount of the loss, or the minimum estimated liability when the loss is estimated using a range, and no point within the range is more probable than another. As additional information becomes available, any potential liability related to these matters is assessed and the estimates are revised, if necessary. Based on currently available information, management believes that the ultimate outcome of these matters, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings could occur. An unfavorable ruling could include monetary damages, additional funding requirements or an injunction. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material impact on the financial position and results of operations of the period in which the ruling occurs, or future periods. However, we believe that any pending litigation will not result in a material liability in relation to our consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 21 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
We have evaluated subsequent events through the date of financial issuance.

50
Table of Contents


Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is designed to provide a reader of our financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of management on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and other factors that may affect our future results. We believe it is important to read our MD&A in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as well as other publicly available information.
Overview
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. is a leading mining and natural resources company in the United States. We are a major supplier of iron ore pellets to the North American steel industry from the five iron ore mines we currently operate located in Michigan and Minnesota. We also operate the Koolyanobbing iron ore mining complex in Western Australia. Additionally, we produce low-volatile metallurgical coal in the U.S. from our mines located in Alabama and West Virginia. Driven by the core values of safety, social, environmental and capital stewardship, our employees endeavor to provide all stakeholders operating and financial transparency.
The key driver of our business is demand for steelmaking raw materials from U.S. steelmakers. In the first nine months of 2015, the U.S. produced approximately 61 million metric tons of crude steel, or about 5 percent of total global crude steel production. This represents a 9 percent decrease in U.S. crude steel production when compared to the same period in 2014. U.S. total steel capacity utilization was about 73 percent in the first nine months of 2015, which is an approximate 6 percent decrease from the same period in 2014. Additionally, in the first nine months of 2015, China produced approximately 609 million metric tons of crude steel, or approximately 50 percent of total global crude steel production. These figures represent a 2 percent decrease in Chinese crude steel production when compared to the same period in 2014. Through the first nine months of 2015, global crude steel production decreased about 2 percent compared to the same period in 2014.
Throughout the third quarter of 2015, conditions in both the domestic and global steel industries continued to deteriorate as steel mills' utilization rates have not improved, crude steel production has trended downward and prices have weakened. We continue to expect the remainder of this year to be challenging for the steel industry as it contends with slowing growth, overcapacity and increased competition.
In China, we believe growth in steel production will be zero to negative. Despite this, major iron ore producers in Australia and Brazil continue to expand supply to the Chinese market with low-cost iron ore, which has driven the seaborne price to multi-year lows. The global price of iron ore has also been driven by mining cost deflation and a sharp fall in Australian and Brazilian currencies versus the U.S. dollar. As such, we expect seaborne iron ore prices will continue to face downward price pressure unless there are vast structural changes to the supply and demand picture, including increased global demand or significant iron ore capacity cuts. This has not only adversely impacted iron ore producers, but also the global steel industry. We consider that very low cost iron ore pricing has facilitated inexpensive steel exported out of China and into the U.S. market.
The Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot price decreased 39.1 percent to an average price of $55 per ton for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the third quarter of 2014. In comparison, the year to date Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot pricing also has decreased 43.8 percent to an average price of $59 per ton during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. These large decreases in Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot price were driven by insufficient growth in Chinese demand to absorb the additional seaborne supply. The spot price volatility impacts our realized revenue rates, particularly in our Asia Pacific Iron Ore business segment because its contracts correlate heavily to world market spot pricing.
In our core U.S. market, we expect industry demand will be supported by a strong automotive sector and improving housing market; however, this support has been partially offset by the continued weakening of the oil and gas sector as well as de-stocking of inventories. The U.S. steel industry is also facing pressure from surging imports as the strength of the U.S. dollar has increased. Management is pleased that major domestic steel producers have filed trade cases and have sought countervailable penalties against what we believe to be unfairly traded imports. We are not pleased with the market response thus far, but believe the situation will gain more traction as preliminary determinations are made by the U.S. Department of Commerce. The preliminary determination is expected from the U.S. Department of Commerce in 2016.
As a result of our long-term contracts, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 when compared to the comparable prior year period, our U.S. Iron Ore revenues experienced a realized revenue rate decrease of 24.0 percent and 22.5 percent, respectively, versus the much higher decreases in Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot price.

51
Table of Contents


Additionally, the first quarter sales tons for U.S. Iron Ore in both 2015 and 2014 include a substantial amount of carry over tonnage from prior year nominations which are priced based on prior year price formulas.
The metallurgical coal market continues to be in an oversupplied position due to continued supply from Australian producers and inconsistent demand for imported coal in China. Australian producers, benefiting from a devaluated local currency, are very competitive in European and South American markets. Reductions in global coal supply over the last 12 months have yet to correct the oversupplied position of the market. The quarterly benchmark price for premium low-volatile hard coking coal between Australian metallurgical coal suppliers and Japanese and Korean consumers decreased 22.5 percent to a third quarter average of $93 per metric ton in 2015 versus the 2014 third quarter average of $120 per metric ton. In comparison, the year-to-date quarterly benchmark average price for premium low-volatile hard coking coal decreased 16.6 percent to $107 per metric ton during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 when compared to the same period in 2014.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, our consolidated revenues were $593.2 million and $1,537.3 million, respectively. There was net income from continuing operations per diluted share of $0.19 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and net income from continuing operations per diluted share of $0.87 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. This compares with consolidated revenues of $979.7 million and $2,342.9 million, respectively, and with net loss from continuing operations per diluted share of $1.89 and $1.14, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2014. Net income from continuing operations in the three months ended September 30, 2015 was positively impacted by a $79.2 million gain on extinguishment of debt. Additionally, results for the three months ended September 30, 2015 were impacted favorably by the decrease in income tax expense of $87.5 million primarily related to unfavorable events in the third quarter of 2014 including the repeal of the Australian Mineral Resources Rent Tax and the placement of a valuation allowance against current year Australian losses. This favorable impact was offset by lower sales margin which decreased by $201.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015 when compared to the same period of 2014 primarily driven by lower market pricing for our products and decreased sales volume partially offset by cost cutting measures and favorable foreign exchange rates. Net income from continuing operations in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was positively impacted by a $392.9 million gain on extinguishment of debt. This was offset by lower sales margin which decreased by $436.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 when compared to the same period of 2014 primarily driven by lower market pricing for our products and decreased sales volume partially offset by cost cutting measures and favorable foreign exchange rates. Additionally, results for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were impacted negatively by the increase in income tax expense of $48.6 million primarily due to the net increase in the valuation allowance on U.S. deferred tax assets, partially offset by the utilization of net operating losses. Net income in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was impacted primarily by $303.5 million of long-lived asset impairment and $73.5 million of goodwill impairment, recorded in the third quarter of 2014.
Strategy
The Company is Focused on our Core U.S. Iron Ore Business
We continue the strategic shift to become a company fully focused on our U.S. Iron Ore business. We are the market-leading iron ore producer in the U.S., supplying differentiated iron ore pellets under long-term contracts, some of which begin to expire in the end of 2016, to the largest North America steel producers. Cliffs has the unique advantage of being a low cost producer of iron ore pellets in the U.S. market. Pricing structures contained in and the long-term supply provided by our existing contracts, along with our low-cost operating profile, positions U.S. Iron Ore as our most stable business. We expect to continue to strengthen our U.S. Iron Ore cost operating profile through continuous operational improvements and disciplined capital allocation policies. Strategically, we continue to develop various entry options for the EAF market. As the EAF steel market continues to grow and evolve in the U.S., there is a potential for iron ore to serve this market through DR-pellets. Near term, we are focused on trial runs under actual operating conditions to confirm what we have already demonstrated in smaller batch trials of DR-pellets. As a market leader in value-added iron ore pellets, we believe this will open up a new opportunity for us to diversify our product mix and add new customers to our U.S. Iron Ore business beyond the traditional blast furnace clientele.
Reviewing All Other Businesses for Either Optimization, Divestiture or Shutdown
We commenced restructuring proceedings for our Eastern Canadian Iron Ore businesses under the CCAA in the first quarter of 2015. During the second quarter of 2015, the CCAA protection granted to the Bloom Lake Group was extended to include the Wabush Group to facilitate the reorganization of each of their businesses and operations. For more information regarding the status of our divestiture of our Eastern Canadian Iron Ore business, see NOTE 14 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS for further information. As an extension of our re-focused U.S. Iron Ore strategy, we continue to consider further divestitures of the Asia Pacific Iron Ore and North American Coal businesses. We believe

52
Table of Contents


the assets from these non-core segments have value and will only consummate a transaction where we believe the consideration fairly and adequately represents such value. Asia Pacific Iron Ore is a well-recognized and reliable supplier to steelmakers in Asia. As we consider selling this business, we will continue to operate Asia Pacific Iron Ore with very low total capital expenditures for the remaining life of mine. We are exploring the sale of the remaining North American Coal assets and committed to ensuring an acceptable value can be realized. Management determined as of March 31, 2015 that our North American Coal operating segment met the criteria to be classified as held for sale under ASC 205 - Presentation of Financial Statements and continues to meet the criteria as of September 30, 2015. We are focused on limiting capital expenditures while continuing to meet environmental, safety and permission to operate requirements.
Maintaining Discipline on Costs and Capital Spending and Improving our Financial Flexibility
We believe our ability to execute our strategy is dependent on our financial position, balance sheet strength and financial flexibility to manage through current demand for our products and volatility in commodity prices. We have developed a highly disciplined financial and capital expenditure plan with a focus on improving our cost profile and increasing long-term profitability. We resized and streamlined our organization and support functions to better fit our new strategic direction. Our capital allocation plan is focused on strengthening our core U.S. Iron Ore operations to promote greater free cash flow generation.
Recent Developments
On July 29, 2015, we issued a lay-off notice to the employees of United Taconite, the United Steelworkers and state and local government agencies, that we intended to temporarily idle our production at the United Taconite mine as a result of an unexpected reduction in iron ore pellet nominations from our customers during the second quarter. We completed the idling of the United Taconite operation by the end of August. Operations could return to normal if recently filed and forthcoming trade cases were to result in increased pellet nominations from our customers.  Conversely, if increased iron ore pellet demand does not materialize during this period, the idled state of production could be for an extended period of time.  This temporary idling resulted in reductions in force at the United Taconite mine.
Our labor agreements with the USW at our Tilden, Empire, Hibbing and United Taconite mines were scheduled to expire at 12:01 a.m. on October 1, 2015. Prior to the expiration of these agreements, we agreed with the USW to extend them for thirty (30) days (until 12:01 am on October 31, 2015). Thereafter, either party may terminate the agreements by providing the other party with 168 hours (i.e., seven days) notice. We continue to bargain with the USW in good faith with the expectation that we will be able to reach a mutually acceptable long-term extension of our agreements. At this time, we do not anticipate any type of labor disruption as the USW has committed to “continue working under the current terms and conditions of employment until a tentative agreement is reached.”
On October 6, 2015, we announced that, effective October 5, 2015, we terminated our Pellet Sale and Purchase Agreement with Essar Algoma. Our decision was made as a result of Essar Algoma's multiple and material breaches under the agreement. While the agreement has been terminated, we remain open to discussing supplying Essar Algoma with pellets on commercially reasonable terms consistent with a just-in-time iron ore supply arrangement.
On October 29, 2015, we announced that, while the effort to sell the North American Coal mines continues, we are adjusting our operating plans to maximize cash flow while still being able to meet customer demands. The adjusted operating plans include the elimination of capital expenditures, labor and operating costs associated with future mine development, and are focused on mining and selling coal from the longwall panels already developed.

53
Table of Contents


Business Segments
Our Company’s primary continuing operations are organized and managed according to product category and geographic location: U.S. Iron Ore and Asia Pacific Iron Ore. As of March 31, 2015, management determined that our North American Coal operating segment met the criteria to be classified as held for sale under ASC 205 - Presentation of Financial Statements. As such, all current and historical North American Coal operating segment results are included in our financial statements and classified within discontinued operations. Additionally, as a result of the CCAA filing of the Bloom Lake Group on January 27, 2015 and the Wabush Group on May 20, 2015, we no longer have a controlling interest over the Bloom Lake Group and certain other wholly owned subsidiaries, and we no longer have a controlling interest over the Wabush Group. The Bloom Lake Group, Wabush Group and certain of each of their wholly owned subsidiaries were previously reported as Eastern Canadian Iron Ore and Other reportable segments. As such, we deconsolidated the Bloom Lake Group and certain other wholly-owned subsidiaries as of January 27, 2015. Additionally, as a result of the Wabush Filing on May 20, 2015, we deconsolidated certain Wabush Group wholly-owned subsidiaries effective May 20, 2015. The wholly-owned subsidiaries deconsolidated effective May 20, 2015 are Wabush Group entities that were not deconsolidated as part of the deconsolidation effective January 27, 2015. Financial results prior to the respective deconsolidations of the Bloom Lake and Wabush Groups and subsequent expenses directly associated with the Canadian Entities are included in our financial statements and classified within discontinued operations.
Results of Operations – Consolidated
2015 Compared to 2014
The following is a summary of our consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
Variance
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
2015
 
2014
 
Variance
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
Revenues from product sales and services
$
593.2

 
$
979.7

 
$
(386.5
)
 
$
1,537.3

 
$
2,342.9

 
$
(805.6
)
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
(538.1
)
 
(723.5
)
 
185.4

 
(1,344.1
)
 
(1,713.2
)
 
369.1

Sales margin
$
55.1

 
$
256.2

 
$
(201.1
)
 
$
193.2

 
$
629.7

 
$
(436.5
)
Sales margin %
9.3
%
 
26.2
%
 
(16.9
)%
 
12.6
%
 
26.9
%
 
(14.3
)%
Revenues from Product Sales and Services
Sales revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased $386.5 million and $805.6 million, respectively, or 39.5 percent and 34.4 percent, respectively, from the comparable periods in 2014. The decrease in sales revenue during the third quarter and the first nine months of 2015 compared to the same periods in 2014 was primarily attributable to the decrease in market pricing for our products including a reduction in the full-year estimate of one customer's hot band steel pricing, together these impacted revenues by $221.8 million and $642.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.
Changes in world market pricing impact our revenues each year. Iron ore revenues decreased $221.8 million in the third quarter of 2015 compared to the prior-year period primarily due to the decrease in the Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot price, which declined 39.1 percent to an average price of $55 per ton in the third quarter of 2015, and a decrease in the full-year estimate of hot band steel pricing. The decrease in our realized revenue rates during the third quarter of 2015 compared to the third quarter of 2014 was 24.0 percent and 43.5 percent for our U.S. Iron Ore and Asia Pacific Iron Ore operations, respectively. Additionally, there was a decrease in revenues period-over-period as a result of lower iron ore sales volumes of 1,397 thousand tons or $135.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015.

54
Table of Contents


During the first nine months of 2015, iron ore revenues decreased $642.5 million compared to the prior-year period and were impacted primarily by the decrease in the Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot price, which declined 43.8 percent to an average price of $59 per ton in the first nine months of 2015 and the decrease in the full-year estimate of hot band steel pricing. The decrease in our realized revenue rates during the first nine months of 2015 compared to the first nine months of 2014 was 22.5 percent and 48.3 percent for our U.S. Iron Ore and Asia Pacific Iron Ore operations, respectively. Additionally, there was a decrease in revenues period-over-period as a result of lower iron ore sales volumes of 1,137 thousand tons or $120.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
Refer to “Results of Operations – Segment Information” for additional information regarding the specific factors that impacted revenue during the period.
Cost of Goods Sold and Operating Expenses
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 were $538.1 million and $1,344.1 million, respectively, which represented a decrease of $185.4 million and $369.1 million, or 25.6 percent and 21.5 percent, respectively, from the comparable prior-year periods.
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2015 decreased as operational efficiencies and cost cutting efforts across each of our business units has reduced costs for the three months ended September 30, 2015 by $91.3 million. Also, as a result of favorable foreign exchange rates in the third quarter versus the comparable period in 2014, we realized lower costs of $34.3 million for our Asia Pacific Iron Ore segment. Additionally, there was a decrease in costs period-over-period as a result of lower iron ore sales volumes of $93.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. These decreases in cost were partially offset by idle costs of $33.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 due to the temporary idle of our United Taconite mine which began in the first week of August 2015, the temporary idle of the Empire mine which began on June 26, 2015 and one idled production line at our Northshore mine during 2015.
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased as operational efficiencies and cost cutting efforts across each of our business units has reduced costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 by $261.2 million. Also, as a result of favorable foreign exchange rates in the first nine months of 2015 versus the comparable period in 2014, we realized lower costs of $74.9 million for our Asia Pacific Iron Ore segment. Additionally, there was a decrease in costs period-over-period as a result of lower iron ore sales volumes of $77.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. These decreases in cost were partially offset by incrementally higher idle costs of $31.4 million due to the temporary idle of our United Taconite mine which began in the first week of August 2015, the temporary idle of the Empire mine which began on June 26, 2015 and one idled production line at our Northshore mine during 2015.
Refer to “Results of Operations – Segment Information” for additional information regarding the specific factors that impacted our operating results during the period.
Other Operating Income (Expense)
The following is a summary of other operating income (expense) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
Variance
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
2015
 
2014
 
Variance
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
Selling, general and administrative expenses
$
(22.4
)
 
$
(49.7
)
 
$
27.3

 
$
(82.2
)
 
$
(131.1
)
 
$
48.9

Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
—

 
(377.0
)
 
377.0

 
(3.3
)
 
(378.6
)
 
375.3

Miscellaneous - net
(3.5
)
 
27.7

 
(31.2
)
 
19.1

 
15.7

 
3.4

 
$
(25.9
)
 
$
(399.0
)
 
$
373.1

 
$
(66.4
)
 
$
(494.0
)
 
$
427.6

Selling, general and administrative expenses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $27.3 million and $48.9 million over the comparable periods in 2014. There were lower severance costs

55
Table of Contents


of $1.7 million and $11.7 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 versus the comparable periods in 2014. As a result of the reduction of the workforce, we have reduced employment costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 by $19.4 million and $27.0 million, respectively. Also, the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 were impacted favorably by $5.5 million and $9.7 million, respectively, due to a reduction in outside service spending. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $73.5 million related to our Asia Pacific Iron Ore reporting unit. Additionally, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded other long-lived asset impairment charges of $303.5 million and $305.1 million, respectively, related to our Asia Pacific Iron Ore reporting unit and reporting units within our Other reportable segments.
The following is a summary of Miscellaneous - net for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
Variance
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
2015
 
2014
 
Variance
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
Foreign exchange remeasurement
$
2.4

 
$
25.8

 
$
(23.4
)
 
$
15.2

 
$
8.4

 
$
6.8

Insurance recoveries
—

 
—

 
—

 
7.6

 
—

 
7.6

Management and royalty fees
0.9

 
2.1

 
(1.2
)
 
4.0

 
7.3

 
(3.3
)
Other
(6.8
)
 
(0.2
)
 
(6.6
)
 
(7.7
)
 
—

 
(7.7
)
 
$
(3.5
)
 
$
27.7

 
$
(31.2
)
 
$
19.1

 
$
15.7

 
$
3.4

For the three months ended September 30, 2015 there was an unfavorable incremental impact of $23.4 million due to the change in foreign exchange re-measurement driven primarily by lower Australian bank account balances that are denominated in U.S. dollars. Additionally, the unfavorable variance was impacted by the change in foreign exchange re-measurement on short-term intercompany notes, and certain monetary financial assets and liabilities, which are denominated in something other than the functional currency of the entity.
The nine months ended September 30, 2015 was impacted favorably by $7.6 million of insurance recoveries related to the clean-up of the Pointe Noire oil spill that occurred in September 2013. Additionally, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 there was a favorable incremental impact of $6.8 million due to the change in foreign exchange re-measurement on short-term intercompany notes, Australian bank accounts that are denominated in U.S. dollars and certain monetary financial assets and liabilities, which are denominated in something other than the functional currency of the entity. These favorable impacts were partially offset by bad debt expense of $7.1 million that was recorded in the third quarter of 2015 related to one customer.
Other Income (Expense)
The following is a summary of other income (expense) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
Variance
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
2015
 
2014
 
Variance
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
Interest expense, net
$
(61.7
)
 
$
(45.8
)
 
$
(15.9
)
 
$
(168.2
)
 
$
(128.3
)
 
$
(39.9
)
Gain on extinguishment of debt
79.2

 
—

 
79.2

 
392.9

 
—

 
392.9

Other non-operating income (expense)
(0.1
)
 
7.7

 
(7.8
)
 
(3.0
)
 
10.1

 
(13.1
)
 
$
17.4

 
$
(38.1
)
 
$
55.5

 
$
221.7

 
$
(118.2
)
 
$
339.9


56
Table of Contents


The increase in gain on extinguishment of debt during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the comparable prior-year period is a result of the corporate debt restructuring and debt repurchases of senior notes trading at a discount, as discussed in NOTE 5 - DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES.
Interest expense was unfavorably impacted by $31.4 million and $62.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, as we entered into new credit arrangements during the first quarter of 2015, as discussed in NOTE 5 - DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES. The unfavorable impact was offset partially by reduced interest expense of $12.2 million and $23.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, due to the extinguishment of certain Senior Notes and the revolving credit agreement during the first quarter of 2015, as discussed in NOTE 5 - DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES. Additionally, other non-operating income during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 included a $7.7 million gain on the sale of marketable securities.
    Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate is impacted by permanent items, such as depletion and the relative mix of income we earn in various foreign jurisdictions with tax rates that differ from the U.S. statutory rate. It also is affected by discrete items that may occur in any given period, but are not consistent from period to period. The following represents a summary of our tax provision and corresponding effective rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
Variance
 
2015
 
2014
 
Variance
Income tax benefit (expense)
$
3.4

 
$
(84.1
)
 
$
87.5

 
$
(169.9
)
 
$
(121.3
)
 
$
(48.6
)
Effective tax rate
(7.3
)%
 
(46.5
)%
 
39.2
%
 
48.8
%
 
693.1
%
 
(644.3
)%
A reconciliation of the statutory rate to the effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 is included below. A comparable rate reconciliation for nine months ended 2014 is not provided as our loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 exceeded the anticipated ordinary loss for the full year and, therefore, our tax expense recorded was calculated using actual year-to-date amounts rather than an estimated annual effective tax rate:
 
(In Millions)
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2015
Tax at U.S. statutory rate of 35 percent
$
121.9

 
35.0
 %
Increases/(Decreases) due to:
 
 
 
Percentage depletion
(35.6
)
 
(10.2
)
Impact of foreign operations
1.5

 
0.4

Income not subject to tax
(4.2
)
 
(1.2
)
Valuation allowance reversal on net operating loss utilization
(76.7
)
 
(22.0
)
Other items - net
0.4

 
0.1

Provision for income tax and effective income tax rate before discrete items
7.3

 
2.1

Discrete Items:
 
 
 
Prior year adjustments made in current year
3.8

 
1.1

Valuation allowance on prior year deferred tax assets
158.5

 
45.5

Tax uncertainties
0.3

 
0.1

Provision for income tax benefit and effective income tax rate including discrete items
$
169.9

 
48.8
 %
Our tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was an expense of $169.9 million and a 48.8 percent effective tax rate compared with an expense of $121.3 million for the comparable prior-year period. The increase in the expense from the prior-year period is due primarily to a decrease of favorable permanent items; most notably, the decrease in tax benefit from interest income not subject to tax.

57
Table of Contents


Discrete items for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 resulted in an expense of approximately $162.6 million. These adjustments relate primarily to the placement of a valuation allowance against U.S. deferred tax assets that were recognized in prior years. Discrete items for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 related primarily to the recording of valuation allowances against existing deferred tax assets as a result of the determination that they would no longer be realizable, the repeal of the Australian Minerals Resources Rent Tax and the finalization of certain domestic and foreign tax returns.
Our 2015 estimated annual effective tax rate before discrete items is 2.1 percent. This estimated annual effective tax rate differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 35 percent primarily due to deductions for percentage depletion in excess of cost depletion related to U.S. operations and foreign taxes and benefits derived from operations outside the U.S., which are taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35 percent and the reversal of valuation allowances due to the utilization of net operating losses. A comparable annual effective tax rate has not been provided for the nine months ended 2014 as our loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 exceeded the anticipated ordinary loss for the full year and, therefore, our tax expense recorded was calculated using actual year-to-date amounts rather than an estimated annual effective tax rate.
Noncontrolling Interest
Noncontrolling interest primarily is comprised of our consolidated, but less-than-wholly owned subsidiary at our Empire mining venture and through the CCAA filing on January 27, 2015, the Bloom Lake operations. The net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest of the Empire mining venture was $4.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and the net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest of the Empire mining venture was $6.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. This is compared to net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest of $2.7 million and $22.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. There was no net income or loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest related to Bloom Lake for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest related to Bloom Lake was $1,010.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest related to Bloom Lake was $7.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest of $1,026.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

58
Table of Contents


Results of Operations – Segment Information
    We have historically evaluated segment performance based on sales margin, defined as revenues less cost of goods sold, and operating expenses identifiable to each segment. Additionally, beginning in the third quarter of 2014, concurrent with the change in control on July 29, 2014, management began to evaluate segment performance based on EBITDA, defined as net income (loss) before interest, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, and Adjusted EBITDA, defined as EBITDA excluding certain items such as impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets, impacts of discontinued operations, extinguishment of debt, severance and contractor termination costs, foreign currency remeasurement, and intersegment corporate allocations of selling, general and administrative costs. Management uses and believes that investors benefit from referring to these measures in evaluating operating and financial results, as well as in planning, forecasting and analyzing future periods as these financial measures approximate the cash flows associated with the operational earnings.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Net Income (Loss)
$
6.0

 
$
(6,887.2
)
 
$
(690.5
)
 
$
(6,943.4
)
Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense, net
(62.3
)
 
(47.4
)
 
(170.7
)
 
(134.9
)
Income tax benefit (expense)
4.8

 
921.4

 
(167.3
)
 
1,012.3

Depreciation, depletion and amortization
(35.6
)
 
(144.0
)
 
(99.1
)
 
(430.4
)
EBITDA
$
99.1

 
$
(7,617.2
)
 
$
(253.4
)
 
$
(7,390.4
)
Less:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets
$
—


$
(377.0
)

$
(3.3
)

$
(378.6
)
Impact of discontinued operations
(44.8
)
 
(7,543.0
)
 
(865.9
)
 
(7,737.1
)
Gain on extinguishment of debt
79.2

 
—

 
392.9

 
—

Severance and contractor termination costs
2.2

 
(2.6
)
 
(9.3
)
 
(19.3
)
Foreign exchange remeasurement
2.4

 
25.8

 
15.2

 
8.4

Adjusted EBITDA
$
60.1

 
$
279.6

 
$
217.0

 
$
736.2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EBITDA:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Iron Ore
$
69.2

 
$
241.9

 
$
239.6

 
$
538.2

Asia Pacific Iron Ore
11.1

 
(302.2
)
 
38.7

 
(150.8
)
Other
18.8

 
(7,556.9
)
 
(531.7
)
 
(7,777.8
)
Total EBITDA
$
99.1

 
$
(7,617.2
)
 
$
(253.4
)
 
$
(7,390.4
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted EBITDA:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Iron Ore
$
72.3

 
$
249.5

 
$
254.6

 
$
559.1

Asia Pacific Iron Ore
9.7

 
49.7

 
32.8

 
225.5

Other
(21.9
)
 
(19.6
)
 
(70.4
)
 
(48.4
)
Total Adjusted EBITDA
$
60.1

 
$
279.6

 
$
217.0

 
$
736.2

EBITDA for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased by $7,716.3 million and $7,137.0 million, respectively, on a consolidated basis from the comparable period in 2014. The period-over-period change was driven primarily by the items detailed above in the Adjusted EBITDA calculation. Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $219.5 million and $519.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, from the comparable periods in 2014. The decrease was primarily attributable to the lower consolidated sales margin. See further detail below for additional information regarding the specific factors that impacted each reportable segments' sales margin during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

59
Table of Contents


2015 Compared to 2014
U.S. Iron Ore
The following is a summary of U.S. Iron Ore results for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
 
 
Changes due to:
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Revenue
and cost rate
 
Sales volume
 
Idle cost/production volume variance
 
Freight and reimburse-ment
 
Total change
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues from product sales and services
 
$
471.0

 
$
767.4

 
$
(135.6
)
 
$
(125.6
)
 
$
—

 
$
(35.2
)
 
$
(296.4
)
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
 
(422.3
)
 
(547.9
)
 
39.9

 
83.6

 
(33.1
)
 
35.2

 
125.6

Sales margin
 
$
48.7

 
$
219.5

 
$
(95.7
)
 
$
(42.0
)
 
$
(33.1
)
 
$
—

 
$
(170.8
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Per Ton Information
 
2015
 
2014
 
Difference
 
Percent change
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized product revenue rate1
 
$
76.52

 
$
100.70

 
$
(24.18
)
 
(24.0
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash production cost
 
48.99

 
58.38

 
(9.39
)
 
(16.1
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-production cash cost
 
13.85

 
6.49

 
7.36

 
113.4
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses rate1 (excluding DDA)
 
62.84

 
64.87

 
(2.03
)
 
(3.1
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation, depletion & amortization
 
4.98

 
3.78

 
1.20

 
31.7
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total cost of goods sold and operating expenses rate
 
67.82

 
68.65

 
(0.83
)
 
(1.2
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales margin
 
$
8.70

 
$
32.05

 
$
(23.35
)
 
(72.9
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales tons2  (In thousands)
 
5,600

 
6,848

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Production tons2 (In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
5,716

 
7,794

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cliffs’ share of total
 
4,099

 
5,814

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 Excludes revenues and expenses related to domestic freight, which are offsetting and have no impact on sales margin. Revenues also exclude venture partner cost reimbursements.
2 Tons are long tons (2,240 pounds).
Sales margin for U.S. Iron Ore was $48.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared with sales margin of $219.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The decline compared to the prior-year period is attributable to a decrease in revenue of $296.4 million partially offset by lower cost of goods sold and operating expenses of $125.6 million. Sales margin per ton decreased 72.9 percent to $8.70 in the third quarter of 2015 compared to the third quarter of 2014.
Revenue decreased by $261.2 million, excluding the decrease of $35.2 million of freight and reimbursements from the prior-year period, predominantly due to:
•
The average year-to-date realized product revenue rate declined by $24.18 per ton or 24.0 percent to $76.52 per ton in third quarter of 2015, which resulted in a decrease of $135.6 million. This decline is a result of:
◦
Realized revenue rates impacted negatively by $8 per ton primarily as a result of one major customer contract with a pricing mechanism affected by a reduction in the full-year estimate of their hot band steel pricing;

60
Table of Contents


◦
Changes in customer pricing negatively affected the realized revenue rate by $8 per ton driven primarily by the reduction in Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot price and other indices used in the contracts; and
◦
Realized revenue rates impacted negatively by $7 per ton related to one customer contract with a reduced average selling price due to a change in the pricing mechanism as prescribed in the current contract which shifted the contract from a fixed rate to a rate impacted by the Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot price, as well as other market rates.
•
Lower sales volumes of 1,248 thousand tons or $125.6 million due to:
◦
A lower nomination in 2015 from one customer consistent with their contract, reduced demand from a customer due to the idling of its mill throughout third quarter 2015, the expiration of a contract with one customer at the end of 2014 and fewer export sales.
◦
These decreases were partially offset by higher sales to one customer in the third quarter of 2015 due to a spot contract with the customer that began in the fourth quarter of 2014, along with an increased 2015 nomination from one other customer consistent with their contract.
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses in the third quarter of 2015 decreased $90.4 million, excluding the decrease of $35.2 million of freight and reimbursements from the same period in the prior-year period, predominantly as a result of:
•
Decreased sales volumes as discussed above that decreased costs by $83.6 million compared to the prior-year period; and
•
Lower costs in the third quarter of 2015 in comparison to the prior-year period primarily driven by the reduction in salaried workforce headcount and reduced maintenance and repair costs based on cost reduction initiatives and condition based monitoring along with year-over-year reduction in energy rates.
•
Partially offset by increased idle costs of $33.1 million due to the idle of United Taconite mine which began in the first week of August 2015, the idle of the Empire mine which began on June 26, 2015 and one idled production line at our Northshore mine during the third quarter of 2015.

61
Table of Contents


The following is a summary of U.S. Iron Ore results for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
 
 
Changes due to:
 
 
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
Revenue
and cost rate
 
Sales volume
 
Idle cost/production volume variance
 
Freight and reimburse-ment
 
Total change
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues from product sales and services
 
$
1,152.5

 
$
1,643.3

 
$
(299.7
)
 
$
(128.3
)
 
$
—

 
$
(62.8
)
 
$
(490.8
)
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
 
(974.8
)
 
(1,181.6
)
 
91.8

 
83.6

 
(31.4
)
 
62.8

 
206.8

Sales margin
 
$
177.7

 
$
461.7

 
$
(207.9
)
 
$
(44.7
)
 
$
(31.4
)
 
$
—

 
$
(284.0
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
 

 

 

 
 
Per Ton Information
 
2015
 
2014
 
Difference
 
Percent change
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized product revenue rate1
 
$
80.85

 
$
104.27

 
$
(23.42
)
 
(22.5
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash production cost
 
57.25

 
65.63

 
(8.38
)
 
(12.8
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-production cash cost
 
4.11

 
(0.08
)
 
4.19

 
(5,237.5
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses rate1 (excluding DDA)
 
61.36

 
65.55

 
(4.19
)
 
(6.4
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation, depletion & amortization
 
5.60

 
5.79

 
(0.19
)
 
(3.3
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total cost of goods sold and operating expenses rate
 
66.96

 
71.34

 
(4.38
)
 
(6.1
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales margin
 
$
13.89

 
$
32.93

 
$
(19.04
)
 
(57.8
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales tons2  (In thousands)
 
12,791

 
14,022

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Production tons2 (In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
20,019

 
21,528

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cliffs’ share of total
 
14,978

 
16,256

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 Excludes revenues and expenses related to domestic freight, which are offsetting and have no impact on sales margin. Revenues also exclude venture partner cost reimbursements.
2 Tons are long tons (2,240 pounds).
Sales margin for U.S. Iron Ore was $177.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared with sales margin of $461.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decline compared to the prior-year period is attributable to a decrease in revenue of $490.8 million partially offset by lower cost of goods sold and operating expenses of $206.8 million. Sales margin per ton decreased 57.8 percent to $13.89 in the first nine months of 2015 compared to the first nine months of 2014.
Revenue decreased by $428.0 million, excluding the decrease of $62.8 million of freight and reimbursements from the prior-year period, predominantly due to:
•
The average year-to-date realized product revenue rate declined by $23.42 per ton or 22.5 percent to $80.85 per ton in first nine months of 2015, which resulted in a decrease of $299.7 million. This decline is a result of:
◦
Changes in customer pricing negatively affected the realized revenue rate by $8 per ton driven primarily by the reduction in Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot price as well as other indices referenced in their contracts;
◦
Realized revenue rates impacted negatively by $7 per ton primarily as a result of one major customer contract with a pricing mechanism affected by a reduction in the full-year estimate of their hot band steel pricing; and

62
Table of Contents


◦
Realized revenue rates impacted negatively by $7 per ton related to one major customer contract with a reduced average selling price due to a change in the pricing mechanism based on the current contract plus the impact and timing of carryover tons.
•
Lower sales volumes of 1,231 thousand tons or $128.3 million due to:
◦
A lower nomination in 2015 from one customer, reduced demand from a customer due to the idling of its mill beginning in March 2015 and the expiration of a contract with one customer at the end of 2014 along with fewer export sales.
◦
These decreases were partially offset by higher sales to one customer throughout 2015 due to a contract with the customer that began in the fourth quarter of 2014, along with an increased 2015 nomination from one other customer consistent with their contract.
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses in the first nine months of 2015 decreased $144.0 million, excluding the decrease of $62.8 million of freight and reimbursements from the same period in the prior-year, predominantly as a result of:
•
Lower costs in the first nine months of 2015 in comparison to the prior-year period primarily driven by the reduction in salaried workforce headcount, along with reduced maintenance and repair costs based on cost reduction initiatives and condition based monitoring and year-over-year reduction in energy rates; and
•
Decreased sales volumes as discussed above that decreased costs by $83.6 million compared to the prior-year period.
•
Partially offset by increased idle costs of $31.4 million due to the idle of United Taconite mine which began in the first week of August 2015, the idle of the Empire mine which began on June 26, 2015 and one idled production line at our Northshore mine during 2015.
Production
Cliffs' share of production in its U.S. Iron Ore segment decreased by 29.5 percent in the third quarter of 2015 when compared to the same period in 2014. Empire mine had a decrease in production of 751 thousand tons related to the idling of Empire production that began on June 26, 2015 and continued throughout the third quarter of 2015. United Taconite mine had a decrease in production of 688 thousand tons due to the idling of United Taconite mine that began the first week of August 2015. There was a decrease in production at Northshore of 397 thousand tons primarily due to running a three furnace operation in the third quarter of 2015 versus a four furnace operation in the third quarter of 2014 and timing of certain maintenance activities.
Cliffs' share of production in its U.S. Iron Ore segment decreased by 7.9 percent in the first nine months of 2015 when compared to the same period in 2014. Empire mine had a decrease in production of 777 thousand tons related to the idling of Empire that began on June 26, 2015 and continued throughout the third quarter of 2015. Empire mine is expected to be back on line by the end of October 2015. United Taconite mine had a decrease in production of 547 thousand tons during the first nine months of 2015 compared to same period in 2014, primarily due to the idling of United Taconite mine that began the first week of August 2015. There was a decrease in production of 294 thousand tons at the Northshore mine during the first nine months of 2015, as we ran a three furnace operation during the first nine months of 2015 compared to 2014 when we ran a two furnace operation for the majority of the first quarter and then started up one idled furnace in February and the other in March. The one furnace currently idled at the Northshore pellet plant was idled in January 2015 and is expected to remain idled throughout 2015.

63
Table of Contents


Asia Pacific Iron Ore
The following is a summary of Asia Pacific Iron Ore results for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
 
 
Change due to:
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Revenue
and cost rate
 
Sales volume
 
Exchange rate
 
Freight and reimburse-ment
 
Total change
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues from product sales and services
 
$
122.2

 
$
212.3

 
$
(86.2
)
 
$
(10.0
)
 
$
(2.0
)
 
$
8.1

 
$
(90.1
)
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
 
(115.8
)
 
(203.2
)
 
51.4

 
9.8

 
34.3

 
(8.1
)
 
87.4

Sales margin
 
$
6.4

 
$
9.1

 
$
(34.8
)
 
$
(0.2
)
 
$
32.3

 
$
—

 
$
(2.7
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Per Ton Information
 
2015
 
2014
 
Difference
 
Percent change
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized product revenue rate1
 
$
39.00

 
$
69.04

 
$
(30.04
)
 
(43.5
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash production cost
 
26.87

 
52.58

 
(25.71
)
 
(48.9
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-production cash cost
 
7.85

 
(0.22
)
 
8.07

 
(3,668.2
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses rate (excluding DDA)1
 
34.72

 
52.36

 
(17.64
)
 
(33.7
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation, depletion & amortization
 
2.08

 
13.72

 
(11.64
)
 
(84.8
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total cost of goods sold and operating expenses rate
 
36.80

 
66.08

 
(29.28
)
 
(44.3
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales margin
 
$
2.20

 
$
2.96

 
$
(0.76
)
 
(25.7
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales tons2 (In thousands)
 
2,926

 
3,075

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Production tons2 (In thousands)
 
2,928

 
2,789

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 We began selling a portion of our product on a CFR basis in 2014. As such, the information above excludes revenues and expenses related to domestic freight, which are offsetting and have no impact on sales margin.
2 Metric tons (2,205 pounds).
Sales margin for Asia Pacific Iron Ore decreased to $6.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared with $9.1 million for the same period in 2014 and sales margin per ton decreased 25.7 percent to $2.20 per ton in the third quarter of 2015 compared to the third quarter of 2014 primarily as a result of decreased pricing as discussed below.
    Revenue decreased $98.2 million in the third quarter of 2015 over the prior-year period, excluding the increase of $8.1 million of freight and reimbursements, primarily as a result of:
•
An overall decrease to the average realized revenue rate, which resulted in a decrease of $86.2 million, primarily as a result of a decrease in the Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot price to a quarterly average of $55 per ton from $90 per ton in the prior-year period; and
•
Lower sales volume of 2.9 million tons during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared with 3.1 million tons during the prior-year period due to prior-year timing of shipments, mainly an October 2014 port maintenance requiring the acceleration of one vessel shipment, resulting in a decrease in revenue of $10.0 million.
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2015 decreased $95.5 million, excluding the increases of $8.1 million of freight and reimbursements, compared to the same period in 2014 primarily as a result of:

64
Table of Contents


•
A reduction in depreciation, amortization and depletion expense of $36.1 million primarily due to the long-lived asset impairments taken during the second half of 2014 and reduced mining costs of $24.8 million mainly due to decreased mining volumes and lower headcount;
•
Favorable foreign exchange rate variances of $34.3 million or $12 per ton; and
•
Lower sales volumes, as discussed above, that resulted in decreased costs of $9.8 million compared to the same period in the prior year.
The following is a summary of Asia Pacific Iron Ore results for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
 
(In Millions)
 
 
 
 
Change due to:
 
 
 
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
Revenue
and cost rate
 
Sales volume
 
Exchange rate
 
Freight and reimburse-ment
 
Total change
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues from product sales and services
 
$
384.8

 
$
699.6

 
$
(342.8
)
 
$
7.8

 
$
1.3

 
$
18.9

 
$
(314.8
)
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses
 
(369.3
)
 
(588.2
)
 
169.4

 
(6.5
)
 
74.9

 
(18.9
)
 
218.9

Sales margin
 
$
15.5

 
$
111.4

 
$
(173.4
)
 
$
1.3

 
$
76.2

 
$
—

 
$
(95.9
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Per Ton Information
 
2015
 
2014
 
Difference
 
Percent change
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized product revenue rate1
 
$
42.01

 
$
81.20

 
$
(39.19
)
 
(48.3
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash production cost
 
32.62

 
51.59

 
(18.97
)
 
(36.8
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-production cash cost
 
5.42

 
2.33

 
3.09

 
132.6
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of goods sold and operating expenses rate (excluding DDA)1
 
38.04

 
53.92

 
(15.88
)
 
(29.5
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation, depletion & amortization
 
2.19

 
14.35

 
(12.16
)
 
(84.7
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total cost of goods sold and operating expenses rate
 
40.23

 
68.27

 
(28.04
)
 
(41.1
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales margin
 
$
1.78

 
$
12.93

 
$
(11.15
)
 
(86.2
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sales tons2 (In thousands)
 
8,710

 
8,616

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Production tons2 (In thousands)
 
8,655

 
8,310

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 We began selling a portion of our product on a CFR basis in 2014. As such, the information above excludes revenues and expenses related to domestic freight, which are offsetting and have no impact on sales margin.
2 Metric tons (2,205 pounds).
Sales margin for Asia Pacific Iron Ore decreased to $15.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared with $111.4 million for the same period in 2014 and sales margin per ton decreased 86.2 percent to $1.78 per ton in the first nine months of 2015 compared to the first nine months of 2014 primarily as a result of decreased pricing as discussed below.
    Revenue decreased $333.7 million in the first nine months of 2015 over the prior-year period, excluding the increase of $18.9 million of freight and reimbursements, primarily as a result of:
•
An overall decrease to the average realized revenue rate, which resulted in a decrease of $342.8 million, primarily as a result of a decrease in the Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot price to a full-year average of $59 per ton from $104 per ton in the prior-year period; and
•
Partially offset by the higher sales volume of 8.7 million tons during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared with 8.6 million tons during the prior-year period resulting in an increase in revenue of $7.8 million. The increase in sales volume was primarily due to more consistent rail deliveries, a more ratable full-year delivery schedule and consistently larger vessel loadings.

65
Table of Contents


Cost of goods sold and operating expenses in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased $237.8 million, excluding the increases of $18.9 million of freight and reimbursements, compared to the same period in 2014 primarily as a result of:
•
A reduction in depreciation, amortization and depletion expense of $104.5 million primarily due to the long-lived asset impairments taken during the second half of 2014 and reduced mining costs of $62.6 million mainly due to decreased mining and hauling volumes and increases in productivity related to maintenance, hauling and train loading, and lower headcount; and
•
Favorable foreign exchange rate variances of $74.9 million or $9 per ton.
•
These decreases were offset partially by higher sales volumes, as discussed above, that resulted in increased costs of $6.5 million compared to the same period in the prior year.
Production
Production at Asia Pacific Iron Ore during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 remained consistent when compared to the same periods in 2014 with a slight increase of 139 thousand production tons and 345 thousand production tons or 5.0 percent and 4.2 percent, respectively. The increase in production tons compared to the prior-year periods is mainly attributable to increased rail capacity.
Liquidity, Cash Flows and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash generated from our operating and financing activities. Our capital allocation process is focused on prioritizing all potential uses of future cash flows. We are focused on the preservation of liquidity in our business through the maximization of cash generation of our operations as well as reductions of any discretionary operating expenses, capital investment and selling, general and administrative expenses. These efforts are critical in light of the continued weakened market conditions as we continue to face the challenges and uncertainties arising from the reduced demand for our products and volatility in commodity prices. If demand for our products and pricing deteriorates further for a continued period of time we would have reduced financial flexibility in the future.
Based on current mine plans and subject to future iron ore and coal prices and supply and demand, we expect our budgeted capital expenditures, preferred dividends and other cash requirements during the next 12 months to exceed our estimated operating cash flows. Although we expect our cash flows from operating activities to be exceeded by our capital expenditures, dividends and required financing obligations during the next 12 months, we maintain adequate liquidity through the cash on our balance sheet and the availability provided by our ABL Facility to fund our normal business operations. Based on current market conditions, we expect to be able to fund our requirements for at least the next 12 months.
Refer to “Outlook” for additional guidance regarding expected future results, including projections on pricing, sales volume and production.
The following discussion summarizes the significant activities impacting our cash flows during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 as well as known expected impacts to our future cash flows over the next 12 months. Refer to the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows for additional information.
Operating Activities
Net cash used by operating activities was $59.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $104.0 million for the same period in 2014. The decrease in operating cash flows in the first nine months of 2015 was primarily due to lower operating results previously discussed.
In our core U.S. market, we continue to expect the remainder of this year to be a challenging one for the steel industry as it contends with slowing growth, overcapacity and increased competition. Throughout the first nine months of 2015, conditions in both the domestic and global steel industries have continued to deteriorate as steel mills' utilization rates have not improved, crude steel production has trended downward and prices have weakened. The U.S. steel industry is also facing pressure from surging imports as the strength of the U.S. dollar has increased. Management is pleased that major domestic steel producers have filed trade cases and sought countervailable penalties against what we believe to be unfairly traded imports. We are not pleased with the market response thus far, but believe the situation will gain more traction as preliminary determinations are made by the U.S. Department of Commerce. In China, we believe growth in steel production will be zero to negative. Despite this, major iron ore producers in Australia and Brazil continue to expand supply to the Chinese market with low-cost iron ore, which has driven the seaborne price to multi-year lows. The global price of iron ore has also been driven by mining cost deflation and a sharp fall in Australian and

66
Table of Contents


Brazilian currencies versus the U.S. dollar. As such, we expect seaborne iron ore prices will continue to face downward price pressure unless there are vast structural changes to the supply/demand picture, including increased global demand or significant iron ore capacity cuts. This has not only adversely impacted iron ore producers, but also the global steel industry. We consider that very low cost iron ore pricing has facilitated inexpensive steel exported out of China and into the U.S. market.
We believe we have sufficient capital resources to support our operations and other financial obligations through cash generated from operations, our financing arrangements and our efficient tax structure that allows us to repatriate cash from our foreign operations, if necessary. Our U.S. cash and cash equivalents balance at September 30, 2015 was $235.8 million, or approximately 87.3 percent of our consolidated total cash and cash equivalents balance of $270.2 million. Furthermore, historically we have been able to raise additional capital through private financings and public debt and equity offerings, the bulk of which, to date, have been U.S.-based.
Investing Activities
Net cash used by investing activities was $57.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared with $207.9 million for the comparable period in 2014.
We spent approximately $58 million and $194 million globally on expenditures related to sustaining capital during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Sustaining capital spend includes infrastructure, mobile equipment, environmental, safety, fixed equipment, product quality and health.
Additionally, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we had capital expenditures at Bloom Lake mine related to expansion projects of $35.5 million.
In alignment with our strategy to focus on allocating capital among key priorities related to liquidity management and business investment, we anticipate total cash used for full-year 2015 capital expenditures to be $85 million to $95 million, including North American Coal and assumes no additional asset divestitures.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities in the first nine months of 2015 was $98.2 million, compared to $17.4 million for the comparable period in 2014. Net cash provided by financing activities included the issuance of First Lien Notes, which resulted in proceeds of $503.5 million which were offset partially by the repurchase of senior notes of $225.9 million and debt issuance costs of $33.6 million. Net cash provided by financing activities in the first nine months of 2014 included $213.4 million of net borrowings under the former revolving credit and uncommitted facilities.
Offsetting net cash provided by financing activities in the first nine months of 2015 and 2014 were dividend distributions of $38.4 million and $107.9 million, respectively. On September 10, 2015, our Board of Directors declared the quarterly cash dividend on our Preferred Shares of $17.50 per share, which is equivalent to approximately $0.44 per depositary share, each representing 1/40th of a Preferred Share. The cash dividend of $12.8 million will be paid on November 2, 2015 to our preferred shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 15, 2015. The last cash dividend is anticipated to be paid to preferred shareholders on February 1, 2016, however, the determination to pay this dividend is solely in the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on business conditions, our financial condition, earnings and liquidity and other factors at the time. Our Preferred Shares will convert automatically to common shares on the mandatory conversion date, which is also on February 1, 2016. Additionally, net cash used by financing activities included the repayment of Canadian equipment loans of $36.9 million and $15.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We anticipate that the remaining balance of the Canadian equipment loans that were guaranteed by the Company of approximately $106 million will be re-paid within the next 12 months. We also had distributions of partnership equity of $31.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and we anticipate approximately $40 million in partnership equity will be distributed within the next 12 months.

67
Table of Contents


Capital Resources
We expect to fund our business obligations from available cash, operations and existing borrowing arrangements. We also may pursue other funding strategies in the capital and/or bond markets to strengthen our liquidity. The following represents a summary of key liquidity measures as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
 
(In Millions)
 
September 30,
2015
 
December 31,
2014
Cash and cash equivalents
$
270.2

 
$
271.3

Available revolving credit facility1
$
—

 
$
1,125.0

Revolving loans drawn
—

 
—

Available borrowing base on ABL Facility2
442.9

 
—

ABL Facility loans drawn
—

 
—

Letter of credit obligations and other commitments
(187.3
)
 
(149.5
)
Borrowing capacity available
$
255.6

 
$
975.5

 
 
 
 
1 On March 30, 2015, we eliminated our revolving credit facility and replaced it with the ABL Facility.
2 The ABL Facility has a maximum borrowing base of $550 million, determined by applying customary advance rates to eligible accounts receivable, inventory and certain mobile equipment.
Our primary sources of funding are the cash on hand, which totaled $270.2 million as of September 30, 2015, cash generated by our business and availability under the ABL Facility. The combination of cash and availability under the ABL Facility gives us approximately $525.8 million in liquidity entering the fourth quarter of 2015, which is expected to be used to fund operations, letter of credit obligations, sustaining capital expenditures and other cash commitments for at least the next 12 months. Based on anticipated cash used from financing activities, letters of credit obligations will decrease by approximately $70 million in the next 12 months.
As of September 30, 2015, we were in compliance with the ABL Facility liquidity requirements and, therefore, the springing financial covenant requiring a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 was not applicable. We believe that the cash on hand and the ABL Facility provide us sufficient liquidity to support our operating, investing and financing activities. We have the capability to issue new secured notes subordinated to the First Lien Notes and additional Second Lien Notes subject to compliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio under our ABL Facility. Available capacity of these secured notes could be limited by market conditions. If demand for our products and pricing deteriorates further and persists for a continued period of time, we believe our ability to maintain the required Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 would be difficult.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, we are a party to certain arrangements that are not reflected on our Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position. These arrangements include minimum "take or pay" purchase commitments, such as minimum electric power demand charges, minimum coal, diesel and natural gas purchase commitments, minimum railroad transportation commitments and minimum port facility usage commitments; financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, such as bank letters of credit and bank guarantees; and operating leases, which primarily relate to equipment and office space.
Market Risks
We are subject to a variety of risks, including those caused by changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We have established policies and procedures to manage such risks; however, certain risks are beyond our control.
Pricing Risks
Commodity Price Risk
Our consolidated revenues include the sale of iron ore pellets, iron ore lump and iron ore fines. Our financial results can vary significantly as a result of fluctuations in the market prices of iron ore. Revenues included within Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax can vary significantly as a result of fluctuations in the market price of metallurgical

68
Table of Contents


coal. World market prices for these commodities have fluctuated historically and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control. The world market price that most commonly is utilized in our iron ore sales contracts is the Platts 62 percent Fe fines spot rate pricing, which can fluctuate widely due to numerous factors, such as global economic growth or contraction, change in demand for steel or changes in availability of supply.
Provisional Pricing Arrangements
Certain of our U.S. Iron Ore and Asia Pacific Iron Ore customer supply agreements specify provisional price calculations, where the pricing mechanisms generally are based on market pricing, with the final revenue rate to be based on market inputs at a specified point in time in the future, per the terms of the supply agreements. The difference between the provisionally agreed-upon price and the estimated final revenue rate is characterized as a derivative and is required to be accounted for separately once the revenue has been recognized. The derivative instrument is adjusted to fair value through Product revenues each reporting period based upon current market data and forward-looking estimates provided by management until the final revenue rate is determined.
At September 30, 2015, we have recorded $0.6 million as derivative assets included in Other current assets and $0.8 million as derivative liabilities included in Other current liabilities in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Position related to our estimate of final revenue rate with our U.S. Iron Ore and Asia Pacific Iron Ore customers. These amounts represent the difference between the provisional price agreed upon with our customers based on the supply agreement terms and our estimate of the final sales rate based on the price calculations established in the supply agreements. As a result, we recognized a net $7.6 million increase and a net $0.2 million decrease in Product revenues in the Statements of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 related to these arrangements.
Customer Supply Agreements
A certain supply agreement with one U.S. Iron Ore customer provides for supplemental revenue or refunds based on the customer’s average annual steel pricing at the time the product is consumed in the customer’s blast furnace. The supplemental pricing is characterized as a freestanding derivative, which is finalized based on a future price, and is adjusted to fair value as a revenue adjustment each reporting period until the pellets are consumed and the amounts are settled. The fair value of the instrument is determined using an income approach based on an estimate of the annual realized price of hot-rolled steel at the steelmaker’s facilities.
At September 30, 2015, we had a derivative asset of $9.8 million, representing the fair value of the pricing factors, based upon the amount of unconsumed tons and an estimated average hot-band steel price related to the period in which the tons are expected to be consumed in the customer’s blast furnace at each respective steelmaking facility, subject to final pricing at a future date. This compares with a derivative asset of $63.2 million as of December 31, 2014. We estimate that a $75 change in the average hot-band steel price realized from the September 30, 2015 estimated price recorded would cause the fair value of the derivative instrument to increase or decrease by approximately $38.7 million, thereby impacting our consolidated revenues by the same amount.
We have not entered into any hedging programs to mitigate the risk of adverse price fluctuations; however certain of our term supply agreements contain price collars, which typically limit the percentage increase or decrease in prices for our products during any given year.
Volatile Energy and Fuel Costs
The volatile cost of energy is an important issue affecting our production costs, primarily in relation to our iron ore operations. Our consolidated U.S. Iron Ore mining ventures consumed approximately 13.3 million MMBtu’s of natural gas at an average delivered price of $3.77 per MMBtu inclusive of the natural gas hedge impact or $3.55 per MMBtu net of the natural gas hedge impact during the first nine months of 2015. Additionally, our consolidated U.S. Iron Ore mining ventures consumed approximately 18.1 million gallons of diesel fuel at an average delivered price of $2.04 per gallon inclusive of the diesel fuel hedge impact or $1.96 per gallon net of the diesel fuel hedge impact during the first nine months of 2015. The hedging of natural gas and diesel is further discussed later in this section. Consumption of diesel fuel by our Asia Pacific operations was approximately 7.8 million gallons at an average delivered price of $2.83 per gallon for the same period.
In the ordinary course of business, there may also be increases in prices relative to electrical costs at our U.S. mine sites. Specifically, our Tilden and Empire mines in Michigan have entered into large curtailable special contracts with Wisconsin Electric Power Company. Charges under those special contracts are subject to a power supply cost recovery mechanism that is based on variations in the utility's actual fuel and purchase power expenses.

69
Table of Contents


Our strategy to address increasing energy rates includes improving efficiency in energy usage, identifying alternative providers and utilizing the lowest cost alternative fuels. A pilot energy hedging program was implemented in order to manage the price risk of diesel and natural gas at our U.S. Iron Ore mines. This pilot program began in January 2015 and concluded during April 2015. Based on the results of this pilot program, a more structured hedging program is being evaluated and may be implemented in the future. We will continue to monitor relevant energy markets for risk mitigation opportunities and may make additional forward purchases or employ other hedging instruments in the future as warranted and deemed appropriate by management. Assuming we do not enter into further hedging activity in the near term, a 10 percent change in natural gas and diesel fuel prices would result in a change of approximately $2.5 million in our annual fuel and energy cost based on expected consumption for the remainder of 2015.
Valuation of Other Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment upon the occurrence of events or changes in circumstances that would indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Such indicators may include, among others: a significant decline in expected future cash flows; a sustained, significant decline in market pricing; a significant adverse change in legal or environmental factors or in the business climate; changes in estimates of our recoverable reserves; unanticipated competition; and slower growth or production rates. Any adverse change in these factors could have a significant impact on the recoverability of our long-lived assets and could have a material impact on our consolidated statements of operations and statement of financial position.
A comparison of each asset group's carrying value to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets, including cost of disposition, is used to determine if an asset is recoverable. Projected future cash flows reflect management's best estimates of economic and market conditions over the projected period, including growth rates in revenues and costs, estimates of future expected changes in operating margins and capital expenditures. If the carrying value of the asset group is higher than its undiscounted future cash flows, the asset group is measured at fair value and the difference is recorded as a reduction to the long-lived assets. We estimate fair value using a market approach, an income approach or a cost approach.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We are subject to changes in foreign currency exchange rates as a result of our operations in Australia, which could impact our financial condition. With respect to Australia, foreign exchange risk arises from our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates because our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, but the functional currency of our Asia Pacific operations is the Australian dollar. Our Asia Pacific operations receive funds in U.S. currency for their iron ore sales and incur costs in Australian currency.
At September 30, 2015, we had no outstanding Australian foreign exchange rate contracts for which we elected hedge accounting. Our last outstanding Australian foreign exchange rate contract held as a cash flow hedge matured in September 2015. Due to the uncertainty of 2015 hedge exposures, we have suspended entering into new foreign exchange rate contracts. As discussed in NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, we have waived compliance with our current derivative financial instruments and hedging activities policy through December 31, 2015. In the future, we may enter into additional hedging instruments as needed in order to further hedge our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Refer to NOTE 13 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES for further information.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest payable on our senior notes is at fixed rates. Interest payable under our ABL Facility is at a variable rate based upon the base rate plus the base rate margin depending on the excess availability. As of September 30, 2015, we had no amounts drawn on the ABL Facility.
The interest rate payable on the $500.0 million senior notes due in 2018 may be subject to adjustments from time to time if either Moody's or S&P or, in either case, any Substitute Rating Agency thereof downgrades (or subsequently upgrades) the debt rating assigned to the notes. In no event shall (1) the interest rate for the notes be reduced to below the interest rate payable on the notes on the date of the initial issuance of notes or (2) the total increase in the interest rate on the notes exceed 2.00 percent above the interest rate payable on the notes on the date of the initial issuance of notes. Throughout 2014, the interest rate payable on the $500.0 million senior notes due in 2018 was increased from 3.95 percent ultimately to 5.70 percent based on Substitute Rating Agency downgrades throughout the year. During the first quarter of 2015, subsequent to a downgrade, the interest rate was further increased to 5.95 percent. This maximum rate increase of 2.00 percent has resulted in an additional interest expense of $6.2 million per annum based upon the $311.2 million principal balance outstanding as of September 30, 2015.

70
Table of Contents


Supply Concentration Risks
Many of our mines are dependent on one source each of electric power and natural gas. A significant interruption or change in service or rates from our energy suppliers could impact materially our production costs, margins and profitability.
Outlook
We provide full-year expected revenues-per-ton ranges based on different assumptions of seaborne iron ore prices. We indicated that each different pricing assumption holds all other assumptions constant, including customer mix, as well as industrial commodity prices, freight rates, energy prices, production input costs and/or hot-band steel prices (all factors contained in certain of our supply agreements).
The table below provides certain Platts IODEX averages for the remaining three months of 2015 and the corresponding full-year realization for the U.S. Iron Ore and Asia Pacific Iron Ore segments. The estimates consider actual Platts IODEX rates and our revenue realizations for the first nine months of 2015. We previously furnished 2015 pricing expectations on July 29, 2015. Due primarily to improved customer mix partially offset by decreased hot-band steel price assumptions, we have increased our revenues-per-ton expectations for U.S. Iron Ore. At a fourth-quarter Platts IODEX assumption of $55 - $60 per ton, the full-year expected range of realizations has increased to $80 - $85 per ton from the previous expectation of $75 - $80 per ton.
Expectations of revenue realizations for Asia Pacific Iron Ore have not changed significantly since the end of the second quarter. We noted that over the past year, Asia Pacific Iron Ore price realizations have ranged between a $15 and $20 per ton discount to the average Platts IODEX price on a quarterly basis.
2015 Full-Year Realized Revenues-Per-Ton Range Summary
Oct. - Dec. Platts IODEX (1)
 
U.S. Iron Ore (2)
 
Asia Pacific Iron Ore (3)
$30
 
$75 - $80
 
$35 - $40
$35
 
$75 - $80
 
$35 - $40
$40
 
$75 - $80
 
$35 - $40
$45
 
$75 - $80
 
$35 - $40
$50
 
$75 - $80
 
$40 - $45
$55
 
$80 - $85
 
$40 - $45
$60
 
$80 - $85
 
$40 - $45
$65
 
$80 - $85
 
$40 - $45
$70
 
$80 - $85
 
$40 - $45
$75
 
$80 - $85
 
$45 - $50
$80
 
$80 - $85
 
$45 - $50
(1)
The Platts IODEX is the benchmark assessment based on a standard specification of iron ore fines with 62% iron content (C.F.R. China).
(2)
U.S. Iron Ore tons are reported in long tons of pellets.
(3)
Asia Pacific Iron Ore tons are reported in metric tons of lump and fines, F.O.B. the port.
U.S. Iron Ore Outlook (Long Tons)
For 2015, we are lowering our full-year sales volume expectation by 1.5 million tons to 17.5 million tons of iron ore pellets, primarily reflecting the termination of the Essar Algoma Pellet Sale and Purchase Agreement in October. We base this outlook on current nominations and, due to this contract termination, have excluded all previously nominated sales to this customer from our forecast.
We are maintaining our previous cash production cost per ton3 expectation of $55 - $60 and the previous cash cost of goods sold per ton3 expectation of $60 - $65. The cash cost of goods sold per ton3 expectation includes expected idle costs.

71
Table of Contents


We remain in active negotiations with the United Steelworkers and are committed to reaching a fair and equitable agreement. The current contract has been extended by mutual agreement of both parties. The contract extension covers approximately 2,200 USW-represented workers at our Empire and Tilden mines in Michigan, and our United Taconite and Hibbing Taconite mines in Minnesota.
We anticipate depreciation, depletion and amortization to be approximately $6 per ton for full-year 2015.
Asia Pacific Iron Ore Outlook (Metric Tons, F.O.B. the port)
We are increasing our full-year 2015 Asia Pacific Iron Ore expected sales and production volumes to approximately 11.5 million tons from our previous expectation of 11 million tons. The product mix is expected to contain 50 percent lump and 50 percent fines.
Based on a fourth-quarter average exchange rate of $0.70 U.S. Dollar to Australian Dollar, we are maintaining our full-year 2015 Asia Pacific Iron Ore cash production cost per ton3 expectation of $30 - $35. Our cash cost of goods sold per ton3 expectation of $35 - $40 is also maintained.
We anticipate depreciation, depletion and amortization to be approximately $2 per ton for full-year 2015.
The following table provides a summary of our 2015 guidance for our two continuing business segments:
 
 
2015 Outlook Summary
 
 
U.S. Iron Ore (A)
Asia Pacific
Iron Ore (B)
Sales volume (million tons)
17.5
 
11.5
 
Production volume (million tons)
*
 
11.5
 
Cash production cost per ton3
$55 - $60
 
$30 - $35
 
Cash cost of goods sold per ton3
$60 - $65
 
$35 - $40
 
DD&A per ton
$6
 
$2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(A)
U.S. Iron Ore tons are reported in long tons of pellets.
(B)
Asia Pacific Iron Ore tons are reported in metric tons of lumps and fines.
*
Subject to fourth-quarter and 2016 pellet demand and customer nominations.
SG&A Expenses and Other Expectations
We are lowering our full-year 2015 SG&A expenses expectation to $110 million, from our previous expectation of $120 million. The reduction is primarily driven by reduced headcount and external services spend.
We expect full-year 2015 interest expense to be approximately $235 million, of which approximately $205 million is cash interest. Consolidated full-year 2015 depreciation, depletion and amortization is expected to be approximately $135 million.
Capital Budget Update
We are lowering our full-year 2015 capital expenditures budget to the range of $85 - $95 million, from our previous expectation of $100 - $125 million. The spending range includes outflows related to North American Coal and assumes no additional asset divestitures. The reduction is driven by spending discipline exhibited across the business.

72
Table of Contents


Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains statements that constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws. As a general matter, forward-looking statements relate to anticipated trends and expectations rather than historical matters. Forward-looking statements are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to Cliffs’ operations and business environment that are difficult to predict and may be beyond our control. Such uncertainties and factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this report, and we undertake no ongoing obligation, other than that imposed by law, to update these statements. Uncertainties and risk factors that could affect Cliffs’ future performance and cause results to differ from the forward-looking statements in this report include, but are not limited to:
•
trends affecting our financial condition, results of operations or future prospects, particularly the continued volatility of iron ore and coal prices;
•
availability of capital and our ability to maintain adequate liquidity;
•
uncertainty or weaknesses in global economic conditions, including downward pressure on prices caused by oversupply or imported products, reduced market demand and any change to the economic growth rate in China;
•
our ability to reach agreement with our iron ore customers regarding any modifications to sales contract provisions, renewals or new arrangements;
•
our ability to maintain appropriate relations with unions and employees and enter into or renew collective bargaining agreements on satisfactory terms;
•
the impact of our customers reducing their steel production or using other methods to produce steel;
•
our ability to successfully execute an exit option for our Canadian Entities that minimizes the cash outflows and associated liabilities of such entities, including the CCAA process;
•
our ability to successfully identify and consummate any strategic investments and complete planned divestitures, including with respect to our North American Coal operating segment;
•
our ability to successfully diversify our product mix and add new customers beyond our traditional blast furnace clientele;
•
the outcome of any contractual disputes with our customers, joint venture partners or significant energy, material or service providers or any other litigation or arbitration;
•
the ability of our customers and joint venture partners to meet their obligations to us on a timely basis or at all;
•
the impact of price-adjustment factors on our sales contracts;
•
changes in sales volume or mix;
•
our actual levels of capital spending;
•
our actual economic iron ore and coal reserves or reductions in current mineral estimates, including whether any mineralized material qualifies as a reserve;
•
events or circumstances that could impair or adversely impact the viability of a mine and the carrying value of associated assets, as well as any resulting impairment charges;
•
the results of prefeasibility and feasibility studies in relation to projects;
•
impacts of existing and increasing governmental regulation and related costs and liabilities, including failure to receive or maintain required operating and environmental permits, approvals, modifications or other authorization of, or from, any governmental or regulatory entity and costs related to implementing improvements to ensure compliance with regulatory changes;
•
our ability to cost-effectively achieve planned production rates or levels;
•
uncertainties associated with natural disasters, weather conditions, unanticipated geological conditions, supply or price of energy, equipment failures and other unexpected events;
•
adverse changes in currency values, currency exchange rates, interest rates and tax laws;
•
risks related to international operations;
•
availability of capital equipment and component parts;
•
the potential existence of significant deficiencies or material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting;
•
problems or uncertainties with productivity, tons mined, transportation, mine-closure obligations, environmental liabilities, employee-benefit costs and other risks of the mining industry; and
•
the risk factors identified in Part I - Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

73
Table of Contents


For additional factors affecting the business of Cliffs, refer to Part II - Item 1A - Risk Factors. You are urged to carefully consider these risk factors.
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Information regarding our Market Risk is presented under the caption Market Risks, which is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 and in the Management's Discussion and Analysis section of this report.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based solely on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. See "Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting" and "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

74
Table of Contents


PART II
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
Essar Litigation. The Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company, Northshore Mining Company and Cliffs Mining Company (collectively, the "Cliffs Plaintiffs") filed a complaint against Essar in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, on January 12, 2015, asserting that Essar breached the Pellet Sale and Purchase Agreement (the "Pellet Agreement") by, among other things, failing to take delivery of and pay for its nominated ore in 2014, failing to make certain payments under a true up provision, and disclosing confidential information. The complaint also seeks a declaration that Essar is not entitled to receive certain credit payments under the terms of the Pellet Agreement. The Cliffs Plaintiffs seek damages in excess of $90 million. Essar filed an Answer and Counterclaim on February 11, 2015, seeking damages in excess of $160 million for various alleged breaches of the Pellet Agreement, including failure to deliver ore, overcharging for certain deliveries, failure to pay certain credit payments and disclosing confidential information. The parties started the discovery process but no discovery cutoff has been set. The parties agreed to attempt mediation of the claims. Two hearings took place on March 7 and March 21, 2015. The mediations were unsuccessful. The Cliffs Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on July 31, 2015, which was granted in part on October 8, 2015. With respect to Cliffs' claim that Essar had breached by failing to take its 2014 nomination, the Court found that Essar had breached and had failed to take between 500,000 and 700,000 tons of its 2014 nomination. The summary judgment ruling also dismissed Essar’s counterclaim that Cliffs had overcharged Essar by improperly measuring moisture levels. With respect to this claim, the Court found that there was "no basis" for Essar's claim that Cliffs had breached the contract. On October 5, 2015, Cliffs terminated the Pellet Agreement because of Essar’s continual breach of the Pellet Agreement. On October 6, 2015, Essar filed motions for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. Essar withdrew both motions on October 15, 2015, before any order was entered on either motion. A jury trial is set for December 7, 2015.
Maritime Asbestos Litigation. The Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company and/or The Cleveland-Cliffs Steamship Company were named defendants in 489 actions brought from 1986 to date by former seamen claiming damages for various illnesses allegedly suffered as the result of exposure to airborne asbestos fibers while serving as crew members aboard the vessels previously owned or managed by our entities until the mid-1980s. All of these actions have been consolidated into multidistrict proceedings in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, along with approximately 30,000 other cases from various jurisdictions that were filed against other defendants. Through a series of court orders, the docket has been reduced to approximately 3,500 active cases. The number of active cases in which we are a named defendant has been reduced to 37 through a series of motions, with some cases being dismissed without prejudice. We have entered into a settlement agreement with respect to these remaining 37 cases and this settlement amount is not material to Cliffs.
Michigan Electricity Matters. On February 19, 2015, in connection with various proceedings before FERC with respect to certain cost allocations for continued operation of the Presque Isle Power Plant in Marquette, Michigan, FERC issued an order directing MISO to submit a revised methodology for allocating SSR costs that identified the load serving entities that require the operation of SSR units at the power plant for reliability purposes.  On September 17, 2015, FERC issued an order conditionally approving MISO’s revised allocation methodology, with some adjustments and clarifications and ordered MISO to submit another compliance filing within 30 days of the order. FERC has deferred its decision on the issue of retroactive refunds until after it has approved MISO’s allocation methodology in full. Should FERC award SSR costs based on the revised cost allocation methodology applied retroactively, we estimate that the potential liability to our Empire and Tilden mines is approximately $13.5 million.  We, however, continue to challenge the imposition of any SSR costs before FERC and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Putative Class Action Lawsuits. In May 2014, alleged purchasers of our common shares filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio against us and certain current and former officers and directors of the Company. The action is captioned Department of the Treasury of the State of New Jersey and Its Division of Investment v. Cliffs Natural Resources Inc., et al., No. 1:14-CV-1031. The action asserts violations of the federal securities laws based on alleged false or misleading statements or omissions during the period of March 14, 2012 to March 26, 2013, regarding operations at our Bloom Lake mine in Québec, Canada, and the impact of those operations on our finances and outlook, including sustainability of the dividend, and that the alleged misstatements caused our common shares to trade at artificially inflated prices. The lawsuit seeks class certification and an award of monetary damages to the putative class in an unspecified amount, along with costs of suit and attorneys’ fees. The parties attempted unsuccessfully to mediate this dispute in September 2015. Discovery remains stayed pending a ruling on the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The lawsuit has been referred to our insurance carriers.
In June 2014, an alleged purchaser of the depositary shares issued by Cliffs in a public offering in February 2013 filed a putative class action, which is captioned Rosenberg v. Cliffs Natural Resources Inc., et al., and after a round of

75
Table of Contents


removal and remand motions, is now pending in Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, No. CV-14-828140. The suit asserts claims against us, certain current and former officers and directors of the Company, and several underwriters of the offering, alleging disclosure violations in the registration statement regarding operations at our Bloom Lake mine and the impact of those operations on our finances and outlook. This action seeks class certification and monetary relief in an unspecified amount, along with costs of suit and attorneys’ fees. The parties successfully mediated this dispute and reached a settlement agreement in principle, subject to a court approval process. This lawsuit had been referred to our insurance carriers and the settlement is not material to the Company.
Southern Natural Gas Lawsuit.  On July 23, 2014, Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama (Case No. 68-CV-2014-900533.00) against the Company and others.  The suit seeks to prevent coal mining activity underneath a gas pipeline at our Oak Grove property and to require defendants to pay the costs associated with relocating that pipeline.  The suit asserts claims for declaratory judgment, permanent injunctive relief and nuisance.  The Circuit Court denied our motion to dismiss the complaint and we subsequently filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Alabama Supreme Court requesting that it direct the Circuit Court to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, which motion was denied. We also filed a Joinder of Additional Parties, including Kinder Morgan, Inc., and a Counterclaim, asserting breach or repudiation of easement agreements, interference with business relations, and slander of title. The parties' respective motions for summary judgment were denied by the Circuit Court in June, 2015, including plaintiff's motion to enjoin mining. Discovery is ongoing. Trial is scheduled for October 2016. Plaintiff's plans to move the pipeline before mining are underway and such move is expected to be completed by April 2016.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes a detailed discussion of our risk factors. The information presented below amends, updates and should be read in conjunction with the risk factors and information disclosed in that Form 10-K and in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015.
We may be unable to obtain and renew permits necessary for our operations or be required to provide additional financial assurance, which could reduce our production, cash flows, profitability and available liquidity. We also could face significant permit and approval requirements that could delay our commencement or continuation of existing or new production operations which, in turn, could affect materially our cash flows, profitability and available liquidity.
Prior to commencement of mining, we must submit to and obtain approval from the appropriate regulatory authority of plans showing where and how mining and reclamation operations are to occur. These plans must include information such as the location of mining areas, stockpiles, surface waters, haul roads, tailings basins and drainage from mining operations. All requirements imposed by any such authority, may be costly and time-consuming and may delay commencement or continuation of exploration or production operations.
Mining companies must obtain numerous permits that impose strict conditions on various environmental and safety matters in connection with coal and iron ore mining. These include permits issued by various federal, state and provincial agencies and regulatory bodies. The permitting rules are complex and may change over time, making our ability to comply with the applicable requirements more difficult or impractical and costly, possibly precluding the continuance of ongoing operations or the development of future mining operations. Interpretations of rules may also change over time and may lead to requirements, such as additional financial assurance, making it more costly to comply. The public, including special interest groups and individuals, have certain rights under various statutes to comment upon, submit objections to, and otherwise engage in the permitting process, including bringing citizens’ lawsuits to challenge such permits or mining activities. Accordingly, required permits may not be issued or renewed in a timely fashion (or at all), or permits issued or renewed may be conditioned in a manner that may restrict our ability to efficiently conduct our mining activities. Such inefficiencies could reduce our production, cash flows, profitability and available liquidity.
 

76
Table of Contents


Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table presents information with respect to repurchases by the Company of our common shares during the periods indicated.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period
 
Total Number of Shares
(or Units) Purchased
 
Average Price Paid per Share
(or Unit)
 
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)
 
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
July 1 - 31, 2015
 
—

 
$
—

 
—
 
$
200,000,000

August 1 - 31, 2015
 
—

 
$
—

 
—
 
$
200,000,000

September 1 - 30, 2015
 
—

 
$
—

 
—
 
$
200,000,000

 
 
—

 
$
—

 
—
 
$
200,000,000

                                         
(1) 
On August 25, 2014, the Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase plan pursuant to which we may buy back our outstanding common shares in the open market or in private negotiated transactions up to a maximum of $200 million dollars. No shares have been purchased through September 30, 2015. The authorization is active until December 31, 2015.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
We are committed to protecting the occupational health and well-being of each of our employees. Safety is one of our Company’s core values and we strive to ensure that safe production is the first priority for all employees. Our internal objective is to achieve zero injuries and incidents across the Company by focusing on proactively identifying needed prevention activities, establishing standards and evaluating performance to mitigate any potential loss to people, equipment, production and the environment. We have implemented intensive employee training that is geared toward maintaining a high level of awareness and knowledge of safety and health issues in the work environment through the development and coordination of requisite information, skills and attitudes. We believe that through these policies our Company has developed an effective safety management system.
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, each operator of a coal or other mine is required to include certain mine safety results within its periodic reports filed with the SEC. As required by the reporting requirements included in §1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K, the required mine safety results regarding certain mining safety and health matters for each of our mine locations that are covered under the scope of the Dodd-Frank Act are included in Exhibit 95 of Item 6. Exhibits of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 6.
Exhibits
(a)
List of Exhibits — Refer to Exhibit Index on pg. 79.

77
Table of Contents


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Timothy K. Flanagan
 
 
 
 
 
Name:
 
Timothy K. Flanagan
 
 
 
 
 
Title:
 
Vice President, Corporate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Date:
October 29, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 

78
Table of Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX
All documents referenced below have been filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by Cliffs Natural Resources Inc., file number 1-09844, unless otherwise indicated.
Exhibit
Number
 
Exhibit
10.1
 
*Form of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. 2015 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Memorandum (Vesting on December 15, 2017) and Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (filed herewith)
10.2
 
*Form of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. 2015 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan Cash Retention Award Memorandum (Vesting on February 28, 2017) and Cash Retention Award Agreement (filed herewith)
31.1
 
Certification Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed and dated by Lourenco Goncalves as of October 29, 2015 (filed herewith)
31.2
 
Certification Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed and dated by P. Kelly Tompkins as of October 29, 2015 (filed herewith)
32.1
 
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed and dated by Lourenco Goncalves, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc., as of October 29, 2015 (filed herewith)
32.2
 
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed and dated by P. Kelly Tompkins, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc., as of October 29, 2015 (filed herewith)
95
 
Mine Safety Disclosures (filed herewith)
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
* Indicates management contract or other compensatory arrangement.

79